Market Signal Briefing

Cardano Sets February Target for USDCx Stablecoin Launch to Boost Liquidity Prefer us on Google

Cardano blockchain network have scheduled the launch of the Circle-related USDCx stablecoin for the end of February.The launch aims to address Cardano’s long-running stablecoin liquidity gap, with under $40 million in stablecoin supply.The move follows a broader push to reduce the blockchain network’s isolation via LayerZero interoperability.The Cardano blockchain ecosystem will integrate USDCx, a variant of Circle’s USDC stablecoin, by the end of February.

On February 15, Philip DiSaro, CEO of the smart contract development firm Anastasia Labs, confirmed that “USDCx” will go live on the network before the end of the month.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Cardano Targets Stablecoin Deficit With Upcoming USDCx DebutUSDCx is a dollar-denominated stablecoin backed 1:1 by USDC held through Circle’s xReserve infrastructure. Circle is the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization.

According to DiSaro, USDCx will function identically to native USDC for retail users, allowing for seamless transactions across decentralized applications.

However, he noted that the asset differs slightly in its redemption mechanics compared to USDC.

“USDCx is functionally identical to native USDC for retail users. The literal only difference in functionality is that USDC can be redeemed directly for USD in a bank account through Circle EXCLUSIVELY by institutional partners of Circle. That means this is not possible and doesn’t matter to retail users, or even DeFi power users because they are not able to do this with USDC either,” DiSaro stated.

Still, DiSaro emphasized that the new stablecoin retains full USDC utility for the broader Cardano ecosystem.

“USDCx is not scuffed USDC; it has all of the functionality that USDC has for retail. You can bridge USDCx to any CCTP enabled chain in a single transaction, which would be the same amount of transactions if we had native USDC. Anything that you can pay for with USDC in a transaction, you can pay for with USDCx in a transaction,” DiSaro explained.

Nonetheless, market observers have noted that the launch represents a critical infrastructure upgrade for Cardano.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Notably, the Charles Hoskinson-led blockchain has historically struggled to attract the deep, stablecoin liquidity seen on rival chains such as Ethereum and Solana.

Data from DeFiLlama shows it hosts less than $40 million in stablecoin supply, compared with the billions held on rivals such as Ethereum.

Previous attempts to bootstrap stablecoin liquidity on Cardano have largely failed to gain traction, leaving the network at a competitive disadvantage in the decentralized finance sector.

So, this move is designed to address the network’s long-standing liquidity fragmentation and bolster its decentralized finance capabilities.

Meanwhile, the initiative arrives as Cardano attempts to shed its reputation for isolation through an integration with LayerZero. This interoperability protocol facilitates communication between separate blockchains.

By leveraging LayerZero, Cardano applications can theoretically interact trustlessly with more than 50 other networks, including Ethereum and Solana.

However, investors have yet to react positively to these structural changes.

BeInCrypto’s data shows that the network’s native ADA token has declined more than 25% over the past month to a 2-year low of $0.24. It has recovered to $0.28 as of press time.

This price performance reflects the broader crypto market downtrend and skepticism about the chain’s ability to capture market share in an increasingly crowded crypto economy.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

TLDR: Table of Contents

TLDR:Role Overview and Multi-Chain FocusStrategic Purpose and Talent InvestmentGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks The blockchain engineer role integrates Ethereum, Polygon, Hyperledger, and Canton.  Multi-chain strategy balances public liquidity with enterprise-grade compliance.  Role focuses on interoperability, secure APIs, and internal orchestration layers.  Compensation reaches $150,000, reflecting strategic blockchain talent investment. Morgan Stanley is building a multi-chain blockchain infrastructure integrating Ethereum, Polygon, Hyperledger, and Canton, with engineers earning up to $150,000. 

Globally, top banks like ICBC ($6.7T assets) and JPMorgan Chase ($4T) are driving trading and investment growth. This highlights institutional focus on secure, real-time financial data and advanced blockchain solutions.

Role Overview and Multi-Chain Focus In their post, Morgan Stanley noted that the blockchain engineer will lead projects integrating at least four blockchains. Ethereum offers a public ecosystem with deep liquidity and extensive developer tools. 

Polygon complements Ethereum by providing lower fees and faster transactions while maintaining compatibility with Ethereum standards.

Hyperledger supports permissioned networks, channel-level privacy, and customizable consensus, making it suitable for internal banking workflows and consortium-based settlement systems. 

Morgan Stanley is exploring integration with at least four blockchains — Hyperledger, Polygon, Canton, and Ethereum — according to a job ad for a blockchain software engineer pic.twitter.com/iAvNU1hKIP

— Frank Chaparro (@fintechfrank) February 14, 2026

Canton emphasizes privacy-preserving synchronization across networks, designed for regulated financial markets.

The combination indicates Morgan Stanley is targeting a hybrid approach. Public networks may handle secondary market activity and broader liquidity access. 

Permissioned networks focus on issuance, compliance, and confidential processing. Engineers in this role will manage the integration across these systems to ensure consistent performance and interoperability.

This structure allows different layers of the platform to operate according to business needs. Developers will need to design abstraction layers, secure API gateways, and key management frameworks. 

This ensures governance, observability, and DevOps controls remain uniform across networks.

Strategic Purpose and Talent Investment Morgan Stanley’s posting highlights the institution’s intent to build multi-chain capabilities while reducing reliance on any single blockchain. 

Ethereum and Polygon provide market access, while Hyperledger and Canton satisfy privacy and regulatory requirements.

By combining public and permissioned systems, the bank maintains flexibility for evolving regulatory landscapes. Banks are increasingly adopting hybrid systems to balance compliance with liquidity opportunities.

The posting lists compensation up to $150,000 per year, reflecting the strategic value of this role. The position signals that Morgan Stanley is not experimenting but actively investing in blockchain infrastructure. 

Candidates are expected to deliver integration solutions that connect public networks with enterprise-grade permissioned systems.

Internal orchestration and platform-agnostic engineering will allow Morgan Stanley to select networks based on product requirements. Engineers will ensure secure transaction processing, consistent governance, and operational transparency. 

This aligns the bank with global trends toward tokenized assets and programmable financial infrastructure.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Brad Garlinghouse got the call. The Ripple CEO landed a spot on a brand-new cryptocurrency regulatory advisory panel, and XRP traders didn’t waste time reacting to the news.

The Financial Stability Board announced Garlinghouse’s appointment on February 15, 2026, pretty much catching the crypto world off guard. XRP’s price jumped 12% within hours, hitting levels not seen since early January. Trading volume exploded past $2 billion in 24 hours, with retail investors and institutional players both piling in. The panel aims to craft future regulatory frameworks for digital assets across G20 countries, and having Ripple’s CEO at the table sends a clear signal about where things might be heading. Garlinghouse brings serious experience navigating messy regulatory waters, something that’s become crucial as governments worldwide scramble to figure out how to handle crypto.

Markets love regulatory clarity. Always have.

The Financial Stability Board coordinates financial policies for the world’s biggest economies, so when they decide to get serious about crypto regulation, people pay attention. Garlinghouse’s inclusion suggests the board wants industry insiders helping shape the rules, not just government bureaucrats making decisions from the outside. “We need regulations that support innovation while protecting consumers,” Garlinghouse said at a fintech conference in London last week, before his panel appointment was announced. His comments pretty much sum up what most crypto executives want – clear rules that don’t kill innovation.

Ripple’s been fighting the SEC since December 2020 over whether XRP counts as a security. That lawsuit’s still hanging over the company like a dark cloud.

But Garlinghouse’s new role might help. Having a seat at the regulatory table could influence how future cases get handled, though legal experts say it won’t directly impact the ongoing SEC battle. Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s chief legal officer, keeps pushing forward with the company’s defense strategy while this regulatory appointment adds another layer to Ripple’s government relations efforts.

The timing’s pretty interesting too. On February 10, the European Central Bank dropped a report calling for comprehensive digital asset regulations, and now five days later Garlinghouse gets tapped for this advisory role. Coincidence? Probably not.

Panel meetings start next month. No agenda yet. For more details, see XRP Surges as Solana and PEPE.

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao backed the move on February 17, saying increased regulatory dialogue benefits everyone in crypto. When the world’s biggest exchange boss supports more government involvement, that tells you how much the industry’s attitude has shifted. Five years ago, most crypto companies wanted regulators to stay away. Now they’re actively seeking engagement, recognizing that clear rules might actually help business grow faster than the current uncertainty.

XRP holders are obviously excited about Garlinghouse’s appointment, but some analysts warn against getting too optimistic too quickly. The advisory panel can only make recommendations – actual policy changes take months or years to implement. JP Morgan released a report on February 16 suggesting that positive regulatory developments could strengthen Ripple’s banking partnerships, but cautioned that concrete results remain far off.

Ripple’s San Francisco headquarters has been buzzing with activity since the announcement. The company’s been expanding its global footprint despite legal challenges, with major financial institutions continuing to use its cross-border payment technology. Over 300 banks and payment providers currently work with Ripple in some capacity, a number that keeps growing even as the SEC case drags on.

The International Monetary Fund weighed in too, releasing a statement on February 15 about the importance of regulatory clarity for digital currency innovation. That same day as Garlinghouse’s appointment – again, probably not a coincidence. Global financial institutions seem to be coordinating their crypto messaging more than ever before.

Market volatility remains high though. XRP’s 12% surge looks impressive, but the token’s still down 40% from its 2021 highs. Crypto traders know that regulatory news can move prices fast in both directions, and what goes up can come down just as quickly if the panel’s eventual recommendations disappoint. See also: XRP Surges Past Resistance as Filecoin.

Garlinghouse didn’t respond to requests for comment about his new role. Ripple’s communications team also stayed quiet beyond confirming the appointment.

The crypto industry’s watching closely as this advisory panel takes shape. Other members haven’t been announced yet, but expect more big names from major exchanges and blockchain companies to get tapped. The Financial Stability Board wants diverse perspectives, which means traditional finance executives will likely join crypto natives like Garlinghouse around the table.

XRP’s trading patterns show institutional money flowing in alongside retail investors. Large wallet addresses have been accumulating tokens since the panel news broke, suggesting sophisticated players see regulatory engagement as bullish for Ripple’s long-term prospects. Whether that optimism proves justified depends on what actually comes out of those panel meetings starting next month.

The panel represents the Financial Stability Board’s most ambitious attempt yet to create unified crypto standards across major economies. Previous regulatory efforts have been fragmented, with countries like Japan embracing digital assets while others imposed strict restrictions. Mark Carney, the FSB’s former chair, had warned in 2019 that inconsistent crypto policies could create systemic risks for global finance.

Central banks from the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan have already committed resources to the advisory process. Federal Reserve officials met with FSB representatives three times in January alone, according to meeting minutes released last week. The European Securities and Markets Authority also assigned two senior regulators to work directly with the panel, signaling how seriously European policymakers are taking these discussions.

Post Views: 1

Active address cost basis now serves as critical resistance zone amid ongoing consolidation phase

Data sovereignty has become a primary concern in the 2026 digital economy. From centralized leaks to unauthorized metadata tracking, users have witnessed the risks of exposing sensitive information on public ledgers. While blockchain offers transparency, it often does so at the cost of confidentiality. As the market matures, there is a growing demand for systems that verify computations without revealing the underlying private data.

Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) was engineered to address this specific challenge. It is a Layer-1 blockchain designed to validate mathematical tasks through advanced cryptography, ensuring that private data remains hidden from the network. By moving from a “trust-based” model to a “mathematical proof” model, ZKP provides a functional infrastructure for secure AI and enterprise-grade data management.

What is Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP)? Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) is a privacy-centric Layer-1 blockchain built to enable verifiable computation while maintaining absolute data confidentiality. The network utilizes zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs to prove the validity of a transaction or task without exposing the inputs used. This architecture supports high-performance workloads, including secure AI model training and private data analytics.

Unlike projects that rely on initial funding to begin development, ZKP follows a “build-first” strategy. The founding team invested $100 million of their own capital to complete the core network, proof systems, and hardware integrations before initiating any public distribution. This self-funded approach significantly reduces execution risk and demonstrates long-term commitment. With only 4 days remaining in Stage 2, the project is currently transitioning toward its next operational phase.

Core Technical Pillars: Privacy-First Layer-1: A dedicated blockchain for secure, verifiable computation. Advanced Cryptography: Utilizing mathematical proofs to validate results without data exposure. Hardware Integration: Native compatibility with specialized processing units. AI & Enterprise Utility: Scalable infrastructure for confidential data workloads. ZKP Presale Auction: Stage 2 Technical Update Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) utilizes a structured Initial Coin Auction (ICA) to distribute tokens transparently. This model avoids the pitfalls of fixed pricing, allowing for organic price discovery based on real-time market participation. To date, the auction has raised approximately $1.86 million, reflecting steady growth as it approaches a critical supply adjustment.

Stage 2 is currently active and ends in 4 days. Analysts monitoring the network’s liquidity and participation rates suggest that if current momentum continues, the total presale funding could theoretically scale toward $1.7 billion as institutional awareness grows throughout 2026.

Operational Mechanics of the Auction: Daily Release Cycles: Tokens are distributed in fixed 24-hour intervals. Market-Driven Pricing: The daily price is determined by the total contribution versus the fixed daily share. Anti-Whale Protection: Limits on individual contributions ensure a decentralized holder base. Supply Compression: Upcoming stages involve a reduction in daily token availability, increasing scarcity. Current Presale Metrics (February 2026): Category Technical Details Current Phase STAGE 2 : ROUND 4 Total Raised to Date $1.86M Reference Price (Previous Day) $0.00007 USD Roadmap Day 78 / 450 Today’s Daily Allocation 190M ZKP Next Stage Daily Allocation 180M ZKP

Proof Pods: Hardware-Backed Network Verification Proof Pods represent the physical utility layer of the ZKP ecosystem. These specialized hardware units are designed to perform the cryptographic “heavy lifting” for the network, generating proofs and validating workloads in exchange for protocol rewards. The team has allocated $17 million for the manufacturing and global logistics of these units, ensuring the network is supported by tangible infrastructure.

Functional Roles of Proof Pods: Off-Chain Proving: Executing complex math tasks locally to keep the main chain fast. Decentralized Security: Distributing verification power across global participants. Measurable Output: Linking rewards directly to computational work performed. Plug-and-Play Integration: Allowing users to contribute to network security with minimal technical overhead.

By anchoring digital rewards to physical hardware performance, ZKP creates a robust “Validity Engine.” This hardware layer provides a level of technical maturity that distinguishes the project from purely speculative software platforms.

The Bottom Line Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP) enters the 2026 market as a fully-built Layer-1 protocol with significant capital and hardware backing. With a $100 million pre-launch investment, $1.86 million raised in current auctions, and a $17 million hardware rollout, the project prioritizes technical readiness over marketing hype.

The structured auction model, combined with the imminent transition from Stage 2 (ending in 4 days), offers a transparent entry for those seeking infrastructure with built-in scarcity. For participants focused on the intersection of AI, privacy, and real-world hardware utility, ZKP represents one of the most technologically complete frameworks in the current blockchain cycle.

Find Out More About Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP):

Website: https://zkp.com/ Presale: https://buy.zkp.com/ X: https://x.com/ZKPofficial Telegram: https://t.me/ZKPofficial This article contains information about a cryptocurrency presale. Crypto Economy is not associated with the project. As with any initiative within the crypto ecosystem, we encourage users to do their own research before participating, carefully considering both the potential and the risks involved. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

The price of Bitcoin once again crossed the $70,000 mark on Saturday, following a significant drop earlier this month. This resurgence was fueled by weaker-than-expected U.S. inflation data that revived risk appetite in the markets. The recovery comes after a period marked by billions in losses and persistent signs of investor anxiety.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin was trading around $70,215, up about 2% over the past 24 hours, with a daily volume close to $43 billion. Market data shows this movement places Bitcoin’s price just below its seven-day high of $70,434 and pushes its global market capitalization above $1.4 trillion.

The latest upward movement followed the January Consumer Price Index report, which showed an annual inflation rate of 2.4%, slightly below the forecast of 2.5%. This softer statistic bolstered expectations that the Federal Reserve might start cutting rates sooner than anticipated, a shift that generally benefits high-risk assets like cryptocurrencies.

Prediction markets reflected this change in sentiment. Traders on Kalshi increased the implied probabilities of a rate cut in April to 23%, while prices on Polymarket also rose over the week.

Bitcoin Price Analysis and Related Stocks

Bitcoin’s price rebound over the weekend also impacted cryptocurrency-related stocks. On Friday, Coinbase (COIN) surged 18% and Strategy (MSTR) rose 10% as investors returned to digital assets.

This movement occurred even as Coinbase continues to navigate a challenging earnings environment, including a $666.7 million loss in the fourth quarter of 2025 due to a decline in trading revenue.

Strategy, meanwhile, remains closely tied to Bitcoin’s volatility, while reaffirming its long-term approach to its treasury. The company revealed a new purchase of over 1,100 BTC this week and reported a significant quarterly loss, primarily due to valuation declines on its holdings, highlighting the balance sheet risks associated with its aggressive positioning. Related coverage: Bitcoin falls below ,000 despite attempts.

The past few months have been tough for Bitcoin’s price, which plummeted from its October high above $120,000 to the $60,000 range after a prolonged decline. The sell-off intensified in early February when BTC fell below the key psychological threshold of $70,000.

Research firm K33 suggested that the dive to $60,000 might have marked a “local bottom,” indicating capitulation conditions in volume, funding rates, options positioning, and ETF flows.

However, the rally has not erased the deeper concern that lingers in the background. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index remains stuck in the “extreme fear” zone, levels last associated with the 2022 bear market and the collapse of major industry players.

No comments yet from major financial institutions.

On February 15, 2026, Kraken, another cryptocurrency exchange platform, reported a significant increase in transaction volume, reaching $6 billion in 24 hours. This rise reflects renewed interest in digital assets following Bitcoin’s stabilization above $70,000. This follows earlier reporting on Bitcoin and XRP Rally While APEMARS.

Meanwhile, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao highlighted that this Bitcoin recovery could encourage other institutional investors to return to the market. He mentioned at a press conference that investor confidence seems to be strengthening despite recent turmoil.

Last Wednesday, Grayscale announced an addition of $500 million in Bitcoin to its flagship fund, the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC). Analysts interpreted this decision as a sign of confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term resilience, despite recent fluctuations.

On February 14, 2026, Fidelity Digital Assets revealed a 15% increase in institutional client interest in Bitcoin, signaling renewed confidence in the cryptocurrency market. This trend was observed following the recent price stabilization.

On the same day, Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest fund announced it had strengthened its position in Bitcoin, adding 2,000 BTC to its portfolio. Wood stated that these purchases reflect a reinforced conviction in Bitcoin’s growth potential, despite recent price fluctuations.

Additionally, on February 13, the Gemini exchange platform recorded a 20% increase in the number of new accounts opened. The Winklevoss brothers, founders of Gemini, attributed this phenomenon to renewed interest in Bitcoin, as investors seek to capitalize on the market’s recovery.

Post Views: 4

Trump’s World Liberty Financial Faces New Probe Over $500 Million Investment From UAE Prefer us on Google

Senators Elizabeth Warren and Andy Kim have requested Treasury Department to investigate a $500 million UAE-backed investment in Trump’s World Liberty Financial.The lawmakers warned that the deal could expose sensitive data of US officials and cause significant national security concerns.The senators have set a March 5 deadline for the Treasury to determine if the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States will review the transaction.Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Andy Kim challenged Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to investigate a $500 million foreign entry into President Donald Trump’s family cryptocurrency business, World Liberty Financial.

In a letter dispatched to the Treasury, the lawmakers flagged a purchase that transferred a 49% equity stake in the project to a United Arab Emirates-backed vehicle just 96 hours before Trump took the oath of office.

US Lawmakers Demand Treasury Probe into WLFIWarren and Kim demanded that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) determine whether this capital injection into WLFI threatens national security.

Sponsored

Sponsored

“Given the speed at which the deal reportedly closed—which ‘granted swift paydays to entities affiliated with the Trumps’—it is
important to know whether Trump officials gave UAE-backed investors special treatment,” the lawmakers wrote.

The senators focused their inquiry on the specific origins of the funds. Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser, reportedly steered the investment.

This transaction placed two executives from his artificial intelligence firm, G42, directly onto the World Liberty Financial five-member board.

The senators argue that this arrangement grants a foreign entity operational control over a company explicitly tied to the sitting president.

Warren and Kim highlighted the geopolitical risks associated with G42. They noted that US intelligence officials previously scrutinized the firm for allegedly supplying surveillance technology to the Chinese military.

“U.S.intelligence has long warned that G42 may have provided technology to assist China’s military, and G42’s current CEO reportedly worked with Chinese engineers to develop a messaging app disguised as a surveillance tool,” the lawmakers stated.

Lawmakers contend that G42’s involvement creates a direct channel for foreign influence within the president’s private financial interests.

The letter also emphasized the risks to data privacy. The senators warned that foreign investors could now access sensitive financial metadata.

They stressed that wallet addresses, device identifiers, and geolocation logs of high-level US officials using the platform could be routed directly to foreign intelligence services through the project’s backend.

Bessent now faces a strict March 5 deadline to explain how the Treasury will handle the conflict. The inquiry forces the secretary to decide whether to launch a probe into a deal that enriches his boss.

Notably, this is not the first time Warren has criticized Trump’s crypto deals with the UAE. Last year, BeInCrypto reported that the lawmaker raised concerns about national security and corruption following reports about the president’s dealings with the Middle Eastern country.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

TLDR: Dogecoin recorded the highest trading volume among all memecoins during the recent rally phase.  Memecoins outperformed Bitcoin significantly before entering correction while BTC remained stable.  Historical cycles show Dogecoin surged 95x and 310x in past rallies with third cycle developing.  The memecoin index tracks twelve tokens showing aggressive capital rotation into speculative assets.
Dogecoin spearheaded a speculative rally that pushed memecoins ahead of Bitcoin and other altcoins in recent days.

Trading volume for the leading memecoin exceeded all other tokens in its category. The surge reflects a clear shift toward higher-risk assets as market participants chase amplified returns.

Memecoins as a group delivered significant gains compared to Bitcoin’s steadier performance. The rally entered a correction phase over the weekend while Bitcoin maintained relative stability.

Trading Volume Surge Reflects Speculative Capital Shift Dogecoin emerged as the standout performer among memecoins with the highest number of trades recorded. Market analytics platform Alphractal noted the exceptional trading activity in a weekend post.

The platform tracks a memecoin index composed of twelve tokens, including Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, Pepe, Dogwifhat, Floki, and Bonk. The index also monitors Ordinals, 1000SATS, Book of Meme, Meme, ConstitutionDAO, and Neiro.

Memecoins jump before BTC. But end Sunday in correction.

Over the past few days, memecoins have significantly outperformed BTC and other altcoins.

What stood out the most was Dogecoin, where the number of trades surpassed all others in its category.

The memecoins index,… pic.twitter.com/sLsmw4lv9r

— Alphractal (@Alphractal) February 15, 2026

The index showed clear outperformance against Bitcoin during the recent trading sessions. This performance gap illustrates how capital rotates aggressively into speculative assets during risk-on market phases.

Traders typically abandon conservative positions in favor of memecoins when seeking higher percentage gains.

Alphractal’s analysis highlighted that memecoins significantly outperformed Bitcoin and other altcoins over several days.

The rotation pattern matches behavior seen during previous speculative episodes in cryptocurrency markets. Retail investors often drive these movements as momentum builds around lower-priced tokens.

However, the memecoin rally showed signs of exhaustion as Sunday trading progressed. Memecoins started correcting while Bitcoin held steady at its current price levels. The divergence suggests profit-taking among traders who capitalized on the recent price spike.

Historical Patterns Suggest Extended Rally Potential Market analyst Bitcoinsensus examined Dogecoin’s historical price cycles in recent commentary on the token. The analysis compared the current market environment to two previous bull cycles. During the first cycle, Dogecoin experienced a roughly 95-fold surge from consolidation levels.

$DOGE Market Cycle Breakdown 📊🔴🟡

If this cycle plays out like previous ones, #Dogecoin may have room to push toward the $5 zone.

🔹 First cycle: ~95x surge
🔹 Second cycle: ~310x rally
🔹 Third cycle: currently developing…

In past cycles, $DOGE has thrived during strong… pic.twitter.com/2dSxbMJ6aI

— Bitcoinsensus (@Bitcoinsensus) February 15, 2026

The second cycle proved more explosive with a rally approaching 310 times the starting price. The third cycle remains in development without a clear peak forming yet.

Bitcoinsensus suggested Dogecoin could potentially reach the five-dollar zone if current patterns mirror past cycles.

Historical data shows Dogecoin performs best during strong risk-on environments across cryptocurrency markets. These rallies typically emerge after extended consolidation periods where the token trades sideways.

The breakout phase then attracts speculative capital as momentum traders enter positions.

The current market structure displays similarities to setup conditions observed before previous major rallies. Technical patterns and trading behavior show familiar characteristics from earlier cycles.

Market participants remain divided on whether historical performance will repeat given evolving market dynamics and regulatory landscapes.

3 mins mins

Stańczak steps down; Aue becomes Ethereum Foundation co‑executive directorTomasz Stańczak will step down as co‑executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, with Bastian Aue taking over. The change centers on continuity of operations rather than a shift in protocol control.

The transition was presented as planned and timed for the end of February, with Stańczak citing a return to hands‑on building and noting improvements in decision‑making speed, transparency, external communications, L1/L2 clarity, and global builder hubs, according to the Ethereum Foundation blog (https://blog.ethereum.org/en/2026/02/13/tomasz-update).

Aue is stepping in to assume the role following Stańczak’s departure, as reported by LiveBitcoinNews (https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/ethereum-foundation-shakes-up-leadership-team/).

Why it matters for governance, roadmap clarity, and ecosystem stabilityOrderly leadership changes reduce governance overhang and help preserve execution continuity across research, grants, and community coordination. Clear handoffs also mitigate uncertainty for contributors and counterparties.

Emphasis on transparency, delineated L1/L2 responsibilities, and more outward‑facing engagement can lower coordination costs. That, in turn, supports clearer messaging around roadmap milestones and responsibilities.

The Ethereum Foundation does not unilaterally control protocol upgrades. Core changes emerge from multi‑stakeholder processes; leadership continuity mainly affects convening power, funding stewardship, and communications cadence.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

In the near term, builders should expect grant programs and workstreams to continue under existing leads. Transitions typically adjust sign‑offs and communications pacing rather than underlying funding scopes.

Validator operations and client teams are unlikely to see immediate effects. Protocol parameters are determined via EIPs and client releases, not by organizational titles.

As Aue assumes co‑executive duties, expect steady external communications and clearer handoffs. Process refinements, if any, would likely target response times and cross‑L1/L2 coordination.

Stakeholder reactions and what continues unchangedVitalik, Aya, and Danny Ryan signal support and continuityIn coverage by crypto/ethereum-foundation-gets-new-leadership-as-co-executive-director-tomasz/?utm_source=openai” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener”>Sherwood News, reporting highlighted stakeholder signals of support and continuity around the transition (https://sherwood.news/crypto/ethereum-foundation-gets-new-leadership-as-co-executive-director-tomasz/).

“There is no one more ready to take on this role than Bastian,” said Aya Miyaguchi, President of the Ethereum Foundation, emphasizing steady leadership during the handover.

EF priorities: transparency, L1/L2 relationships, external engagement, builder hubsCommentary around the transition has emphasized stronger external engagement, including exploration of AI, according to MEXC News (https://www.mexc.co/news/717136). Leadership messaging has also stressed transparency, clearer L1/L2 relationships, and support for global builder hubs.

At the time of this writing, broader market context remained mixed; Coinbase Global (COIN) last traded near the mid‑$160s, based on data from Nasdaq. Such moves underscore ongoing volatility independent of EF leadership changes.

FAQ about Ethereum Foundation leadership changeWho is Bastian Aue and what relevant experience does he bring to the EF leadership role?Aue is a long‑time EF operator endorsed by leadership and researchers for judgment, organizational knowledge, and alignment with Ethereum’s mission and culture.

How will this transition affect Ethereum’s roadmap, including L1/L2 scaling priorities and AI initiatives?Roadmap governance remains multi‑stakeholder. Messaging suggests continuity: transparency, L1/L2 clarity, external engagement, and selective AI exploration without near‑term protocol changes.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

2 Marijuana Stocks To Give Investors The Advantage To Making A Profit

2 minute read Top Marijuana Stock Picks Heading Into The Week Even with legal cannabis growing in acceptance, it is still a highly volatile market. This means that most publicly traded cannabis companies exhibit unpredictable trading patterns. Now, all sectors of the stock market face volatility; it’s just that the cannabis sector sees a significant portion of it. However, volatility has not stopped investors from making a profit.

As well as people finding the top marijuana stocks to buy. At this time, the focus is on long-term investing. Especially with all the reform and regulatory changes happening in 2026. The future is where many see their big return, as 2026 is another pivotal time for legal operators. Even global markets like Europe and Canada are going through their own changes. This lets investors know there is something going on where they may need to adjust their trading strategy.

A big part of trading pot stocks and making a profit is being able to make changes when the market shifts. 2026 is setting up to be a crucial time for legal cannabis as reform in the USA is shaking things up. Still, there is a lot of opportunity if you can plan correctly and execute your trading at the right time, whether you are buying or selling. Below are a couple of marijuana stocks to watch that could help your portfolio become more profitable.

Top Marijuana Stocks For Investors 2026 GrowGeneration Corp. (OTC:GRWG) Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HYFM) GrowGeneration Corp. GrowGeneration Corp., through its subsidiaries, owns and operates retail hydroponic and organic gardening stores in the United States. It operates through two segments, Cultivation and Gardening, and Storage Solutions.

In more current news, the company recently hosted an art exhibit. This exhibit took place at the Indoor Ag-Con 2026 Conference, back on February 11–12, 2026.

[Read More] Marijuana Stocks to Watch as 2026 Trading Momentum Builds

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes hydroponics equipment and supplies for controlled environment agriculture (CEA) in the United States and Canada.

The company has yet to release any new updates, and it’s been over 3 months since that time. However, back in November, the company reported its Q3 2025 earnings.

[Read More] 2 Top Marijuana Stocks For Investors Now

Comparison of Third Quarter vs. Prior Year Period: Net sales decreased to $29.4 million compared to $44.0 million. Gross Profit Margin decreased to 11.6% of net sales compared to 19.4%. Adjusted Gross Profit Margin(1) decreased to 18.8% of net sales compared to 24.3%. SG&A expense and Adjusted SG&A(1) expense decreased by 6.8% and 7.4%, respectively. Net loss increased to $16.4 million compared to $13.1 million. Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $(4.4) million compared to less than $0.1 million. Cash used in operating activities and Free Cash Flow(1) improved $4.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively. MAPH Enterprises, LLC | (305) 414-0128 | 1501 Venera Ave, Coral Gables, FL 33146 | [email protected]

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

The S&P 500 stands as the ultimate benchmark for investors, a yardstick against which portfolios are measured. Warren Buffett has championed this view for decades, urging everyday investors to stick with it. In his 2016 Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letter, he stated, “Over the years, I’ve often been asked for investment advice. My regular recommendation has been a low-cost S&P 500 index fund.” The logic is straightforward: If you can’t beat the market, just buy the market.

Yet, in 2026, one ETF is shattering that narrative, delivering returns that dwarf the benchmark. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSEARCA:IWM) is up 6.8% year-to-date while the S&P 500 has slipped 0.1%. Over the past year, the iShares’ ETF edge has endured with a 17.6% gain, outpacing the S&P 500’s 14.9% advance. 

Remarkably, the ETF achieves this without the S&P’s heavy tilt toward megacaps like Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Instead, it taps into small-cap dynamism, proving that overlooked segments can lead when conditions shift.

Small Caps’ Pandemic-Era Struggles Small-cap stocks have lagged the broader market since 2020, weighed down by a perfect storm of challenges. The pandemic hit these companies hardest. J.P. Morgan Asset Management says small caps carry higher debt loads — often 1.5 times that of large caps — making them more exposed to economic shocks.

Inflation, fueled by expansive government stimulus, added fuel to the fire. As prices spiked, small businesses faced squeezed margins without the pricing power of giants. Then came the Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate hikes, pushing interest rates to 40-year highs. Small caps — reliant on floating-rate debt for growth — saw borrowing costs soar, stifling expansion. Wellington Management notes that these firms are more economically sensitive, underperforming in late-cycle environments with elevated leverage. 

The Russell 2000 Index — the iShares ETF’s benchmark — returned just 2.2% annually from 2020 through 2024, versus the S&P 500’s 15.1% average. This prolonged slump left small caps trading at a 20% valuation discount to large caps by late 2024.

Rate Relief Ignites a Small-Cap Rally The tide began turning in 2025 as inflation cooled and rate cuts materialized. The central bank slashed rates three times that year, lowering the federal funds rate to 3.50%-3.75%. This easing alleviated pressure on small businesses, unlocking access to cheaper capital for hiring and investment, and small-cap earnings rebounded sharply.

T. Rowe Price reports that after three years of declines, Russell 2000 earnings grew 12% in late 2025, outpacing large-cap growth for the first time since 2021. From an April low, small caps surged into January 2026, with improved profitability in sectors like industrials and financials.

Looking ahead, the Fed seems hesitant on cutting rates at its next meeting, but economists project two to three more cuts this year, potentially dropping rates to 2.75% to 3.00%, and boosting small caps further. Lower borrowing costs could amplify their inherent agility, driving outsized gains as domestic-focused firms capitalize on U.S. recovery.

A Low-Cost Bet on Small-Caps iShares Russell 2000 ETF provides straightforward exposure to this resurgence by tracking the Russell 2000 Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of about 2,000 U.S. small-cap stocks. These range from $8 million to as much as $39 billion in market value — which strains the “small-cap” moniker — but span sectors like industrials (19%), financials (17%), and healthcare (17%). 

Unlike the tech-heavy S&P 500, iShares’ top holdings — such as Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) and Credo Technology Group (NASDAQ:CRDO) — tilt toward diversified growth plays, with no single stock exceeding 1% of assets.

The ETF manages $76.2 billion in assets under management (AUM), making it one of the largest small-cap vehicles. Liquidity is robust, with average daily volume topping 30 million shares. Its expense ratio of 0.19% keeps costs low, and combined with quarterly rebalancing, positions the iShares ETF as an accessible tool for capturing small-cap upside without active management fees.

Key Takeaway Historically, small-cap stocks have outperformed large caps over long horizons, delivering a 2% to 3% annual premium since 1926 — except during adverse conditions like sky-high interest rates that crimp their debt-fueled growth. With rates normalizing and AI spending facing investor scrutiny for diminishing returns, the environment favors small caps’ innovation edge. 

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF offers a simple, affordable way to harness this shift, beyond just “buying the market” strategies in the years ahead.

NEW YORK, Feb. 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces that it is investigating potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of GSI Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: GSIT) resulting from allegations that GSI Technology may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased GSI Technology securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52527 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On February 3, 2026, a post was issued on Stockwits in which it stated that “GSI is almost certainly hiding that their chip did not run Gemma-3 at all, only the pre-generation RAG phase. APU lack the MAC units required for matrix multiplication, which is critical for AI workloads.”

On this news, GSI Technology’s stock price fell $1.08 per share, or 14.2%, to close at $6.52 per share on February 4, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com

It's an easy way to quickly own 150-plus companies growing at a solid clip.

If you're like me, you would love a portfolio chock-full of terrific growth stocks. But achieving that is easier said than done, because you'll need some time and skill to study the universe of stocks, deciding which ones have the most promise and when you should buy -- and/or sell -- them.

Thus, it can be smart to stick with one or two great growth exchange-traded funds (ETFs). (An ETF is a fund that trades like a stock, making it easy to get in and out of.) Here's a look at one of my favorites -- the Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG 0.47%)

Image source: Getty Images.

The table below shows how it has performed, and offers comparative numbers for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO +0.06%):

Time Period

Vanguard Growth ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Past 5 years

12.81%

13.82%

Past 10 years

18.55%

16.09%

Past 15 years

15.40%

13.77%

Data source: Morningstar as of Feb. 9, 2026.

Why you might invest in the Vanguard Growth ETF Here are some reasons I love this ETF:

It sports a solid performance record. Its expense ratio (annual fee) is just 0.04%, so you'll fork over only $0.40 annually for each $1,000 you have invested in the fund. It's full of large, established companies, including the "Magnificent Seven."

Today's Change

(

-0.47

%) $

-2.17

Current Price

$

457.98

Here are the ETF's recent top 10 holdings:

Stock

Percent of ETF

Nvidia

12.73%

Apple

11.88%

Microsoft

10.63%

Alphabet Class A

5.39%

Amazon

4.58%

Alphabet Class C

4.27%

Meta Platforms

4.26%

Broadcom

4.04%

Tesla

3.77%

Eli Lilly

2.72%

Data source: Morningstar as of Dec. 31, 2025.

Why you might not invest in the Vanguard Growth ETF Of course, the ETF is not for everyone, and you might think twice if:

You're worried about an imminent market meltdown -- because during such pullbacks, growth stocks often fall harder than their counterparts. You don't love very concentrated funds. This ETF recently held about 64% of its assets in just its top 10 holdings. (It recently held 151 different stocks.) Indeed, about 35% of its assets were in just its top three holdings! This is a plus, of course, if you're exceptionally bullish on the future of companies such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. You'd like some dividend income. This ETF's recent yield was just 0.42%, even less than the S&P 500's recent 1.1%. So take a closer look, weigh the fund's pros and cons, and see what you think. Remember that there are plenty of other promising ETFs out there, too.

Selena Maranjian has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, Vanguard Growth ETF, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

In recent weeks, Nvidia's generally high-flying stock lost some momentum.

Investors looking for an artificial intelligence (AI) winner over the past few years knew they could turn to Nvidia (NVDA 2.21%). As the leading designer of AI chips, the company has delivered soaring revenue every quarter, high profitability on sales, and a very clear and consistent message: Demand from AI customers has been surging, at times ever surpassing supply.

All of this has helped Nvidia's stock price to skyrocket. Over the past five years, it's climbed 1,100%. But, in recent times, investors haven't been as quick to rush into AI stocks as they were in the past. In November, they worried about the high valuations of these players and the possibility of an AI bubble forming. And though comments from companies across the industry about strong AI demand have offered reason for optimism, any negative news has weighed heavily on Nvidia and other AI stocks.

In fact, some of the negative sentiment recently pushed Nvidia stock to do something it hasn't done in a year. And history is very clear about what happens next.

Image source: Getty Images.

The news that hurt Nvidia So, first, let's quickly note the news that's hurt Nvidia stock over the past few weeks. As mentioned, general worries about an AI bubble have remained in the background, spurring concern that the AI revenue opportunity may fall short of expectations. Investors have kept an eye on investment trends as sustained investment is a key part of the AI growth story.

And that brings me to the news that hurt Nvidia a few weeks ago. The Wall Street Journal reported that Nvidia's plan to invest as much as $100 billion in AI lab OpenAI had stalled. Though Nvidia chief Jensen Huang denied any troubles or change of plans, Nvidia stock still stumbled on the news. OpenAI, as a major innovator in the space, is an important client for Nvidia, so any possibility of a rift worried investors.

Now, let's consider the move that Nvidia's stock made in recent days. The shares reached their lowest valuation in relation to forward earnings estimates in almost a year.

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts

And history shows that every time over the past three years that Nvidia's valuation significantly dropped, the stock quickly went on to gain.

NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts

What may happen next So, history is very clear about what generally happens next: Nvidia stock won't remain cheap for long as investors pile in, leading the stock to rebound and advance.

But before you start cheering, it's important to note a couple of things. First of all, history isn't always right. It offers us a picture of common patterns and trends, but this doesn't mean these will repeat themselves 100% of the time. Second, it's important to note that the general environment for AI stocks, as well as the economic environment today, is different than the one a year or two ago. Investors have become a bit more cautious, and that could slow the pace of gains moving forward.

Today's Change

(

-2.21

%) $

-4.13

Current Price

$

182.81

Does this mean you should avoid Nvidia stock? I say just the opposite. Today's dip in valuation represents a fantastic buying opportunity. Nvidia's leadership in the chip market, along with its extensive portfolio of related products and services, makes it a central player in the AI story. Even if AI customers buy some chips from other providers or, in some cases, design their own, most major players rely on Nvidia chips as the backbone of their AI systems.

And Nvidia's commitment to innovation should keep this going as ambitious AI customers aim to work with the very best and latest products available. Nvidia has promised to update its chips annually, and as part of this, the company plans to release its Rubin platform later this year. This represents a big revenue driver ahead if the last big releases are any guide. Blackwell and Blackwell Ultra each met with soaring demand.

Meanwhile, the long-term AI story hasn't changed, with analysts predicting a trillion-dollar market a few years from now. And Nvidia is set to benefit from this.

All of this means that even if Nvidia stock doesn't follow the historical trend and quickly rebound, it's still well-positioned to soar over time -- and that makes it a bargain buy on the dip today.

This quantum stock may be more hype than substance.

IBM, Alphabet, and a handful of "pure-play" start-ups are hard at work trying to take quantum computing from the lab to the real world. These companies have made real progress in recent years in this sector, and given the technology's revolutionary promise, investors have piled in.

What sets Quantum Computing apart One of these pure plays, Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT +3.36%), has tried to separate itself from the pack by taking a different approach. While its competition is attempting to build the most powerful quantum computers they can, this company is focusing on what it says are more imminent solutions -- quantum products that can be put to use and drive revenue much faster.

Image source: Getty Images.

These include thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) photonic integrated circuits (PICs) -- basically quantum semiconductors -- as well as software that's designed to support quantum computing systems. The company says that its products are flexible and designed to perform across "high-performance computing, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity."

That's a compelling narrative, but if you ask me, that may be all it is -- a nice story.

Today's Change

(

3.36

%) $

0.28

Current Price

$

8.46

The basic math doesn't add up Before I go any further, here's a look at the company's financials, which tell a different story. The company generated roughly $546,000 in revenue over the last 12 months. That's not much to speak of, especially given that its market capitalization is $1.87 billion.

At the same time, Quantum Computing is spending tens of millions of dollars a year on development, and there's not much to indicate this is going to change anytime soon. The only real bright spot in the company's financials is its $555 million in cash reserves, which gives it a long runway and room to maneuver.

How did it fill its coffers with so much funding, given its minimal revenue? Stock sales.

The company issued more than $840 million in additional common stock over the last 12 months. While it may not need to do so again in the near term, it's clear the company takes no issue with heavily diluting its shareholders.

There are more red flags Aside from the financials, when evaluating a stock, I put a lot of stock in a company's management. I look at not just their ability to execute and show sound financial judgment, but also how they communicate to the public and their shareholders. Quantum Computing's management is fond of making pretty significant claims that they struggle to back up. They also appear to overstate the company's capabilities.

Case in point: The company regularly puts out press releases that imply a more significant commercial relationship than is the case. Most of its contracts up to this point are one-off research grants and prototyping. These are not sustainable, meaningful commercial contracts.

You only need to look at the company's top line to see that. Despite claiming to have real products that can drive near-term revenue, it's getting little to no traction.

The bottom line Is Quantum Computing stock going to zero? I actually think there's a reasonable chance it will. At the very least, I believe it will seriously underperform the market. This is not a stock I would recommend buying.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© IM Imagery / Shutterstock.com

Vertiv Holdings Co (NYSE:VRT) delivered a 20% surge this week, closing at $234.63 on Friday while the S&P 500 slipped 1.29% and the industrial sector gained just 0.57%.

This data center infrastructure provider rocketed higher on three converging storylines that matter far beyond this week’s chart.

Vertiv Has Outperformed Across the Past Year This week’s move extends an already extraordinary run. Vertiv is up 44.82% year-to-date and 115% over the past year. The stock trades at 69x trailing earnings, well above typical industrial valuations, but the forward multiple of 38x tells you the market expects explosive growth ahead. With 80% institutional ownership and an analyst target of $259.11, professional money is clearly betting on continuation.

Storyline One: Institutional Momentum Accelerates The first catalyst driving this week’s move is raw institutional demand. According to FXEmpire analysis published February 13, Vertiv has seen substantial institutional inflows, with the stock climbing 1,360% since February 2023. This isn’t retail speculation. It’s systematic capital allocation by funds that see Vertiv as the purest play on AI data center infrastructure.

The company filed Q4 2025 earnings on Wednesday morning, beating EPS estimates by 5.4% with $1.36 per share. But the real story wasn’t the quarter. It was the order book.

Storyline Two: Record Orders Signal AI CapEx Acceleration Vertiv reported orders growth of 252% year-over-year, pushing backlog to $15.0 billion, up 109% from last year. The book-to-bill ratio hit 2.9x, meaning they’re booking nearly three dollars of future revenue for every dollar they ship today. Morningstar noted this record order book growth indicates an acceleration in AI data center spending, given that over 80% of Vertiv’s revenue comes from data center infrastructure.

CEO Giordano Albertazzi framed it clearly: “Our fourth quarter performance demonstrates Vertiv’s leadership position in an increasingly complex and demanding data center market.” Translation: hyperscalers and enterprises are scrambling to build AI-capable infrastructure, and Vertiv sells the cooling and power systems that keep those chips running.

Storyline Three: 2026 Guidance Raises the Bar The third driver is forward guidance that shocked even bullish analysts. Vertiv projected 2026 revenue of $13.25 to $13.75 billion, representing 27% to 29% organic growth. Adjusted EPS guidance of $5.97 to $6.07 implies 43% growth at the midpoint. The company expects to generate $2.1 to $2.3 billion in adjusted free cash flow, giving management substantial firepower after deploying roughly $1 billion on acquisitions in Q4.

Vertiv soared this week, but the gains were more than justified. We recently recommended Vertiv shares for $170.95 in our $500,000 AI Portfolio. That recommendation is already up 37%. With the AI boom continuing to expand, Vertiv looks like one of the leading stocks that benefits across hyperscaler spending.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© Courtesy of AST SpaceMobile

AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ:ASTS) dropped 19% this week, falling from $101.79 to $82.51 as the space-based cellular broadband company executed a complex capital raise strategy. While the broader market dipped just 1.29% over the same period, ASTS investors faced three major storylines that reshaped the company’s financial structure.

The Bigger Picture on Performance Despite this week’s decline, ASTS holds a 13.6% gain year-to-date and remains up 175% over the past year. The stock hit a 52-week high of $129.89 before this week’s pullback, reflecting the volatility of pre-revenue space infrastructure plays. The company’s $30.6 billion market cap sits on just $18.5 million in trailing twelve-month revenue, pricing in massive expectations for the satellite deployment campaign ahead.

Storyline 1: $1 Billion Convertible Notes Offering On February 12, ASTS announced a $1 billion convertible senior notes offering due 2036 at 2.25% interest. The company expects net proceeds of approximately $983.7 million to fund three strategic priorities: accelerating spectrum deployment, monetizing AI-related technology, and enhancing government space investments. This represents significant capital for a company that burned through $94.4 million in Q3 2025 operating expenses alone.

Reddit’s r/wallstreetbets generated 855 upvotes and 254 comments as traders processed the dilution implications. Sentiment scores plunged to 32 (bearish) in the early morning hours of February 12 before stabilizing to neutral territory later that day.

Storyline 2: $300 Million Debt Buyback Program Concurrent with the new notes offering, ASTS announced plans to repurchase up to $300 million of existing convertible senior notes, targeting its 4.25% notes due 2032 and 2.375% notes due 2032. This debt restructuring refinances higher-cost obligations with the new 2.25% notes, reducing interest expense while extending maturity dates.

Wall Street analysts hold a cautious stance on ASTS, with three Buy ratings, five Hold ratings, and two Strong Sell ratings. The consensus target price of $81.64 sits just below the current trading level, suggesting limited near-term upside despite ambitious satellite deployment plans.

Storyline 3: Major Insider Selling Pressure American Tower Corp (NYSE: AMT), a 10% owner, disposed of 2.29 million shares on December 9, 2025 at $69.75, representing approximately $159.7 million in selling pressure. While this transaction occurred in early December, it established a pattern of institutional profit-taking that likely influenced sentiment heading into this week’s capital raise announcements.

Overall, Nasdaq records show 8 open market buys and 23 sells total across the past year. The most recent activity was buys by Director Keith Larson that were on an automated schedule.

Overall, the company’s path forward hinges on executing its satellite launch campaign targeting 45-60 satellites by end of 2026 and converting over $1 billion in contracted revenue commitments into actual cash flow. With $1.2 billion in cash as of September 30, 2025, ASTS now has the capital cushion to fund operations through the critical deployment phase.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in NBIS over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The information contained herein is for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article should be taken as a solicitation to purchase or sell securities. Before buying or selling any stock, you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion or consult a financial advisor. Investing includes risks, including loss of principal.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© 2024 Getty Images / Getty Images Entertainment via Getty Images

Rivian Automotive Inc (NASDAQ:RIVN | RIVN Price Prediction) gained 19.8% this week, closing at $17.73 on Friday, February 13, 2026. While Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) managed just 1.54% over the same period, Rivian’s surge came despite year-to-date losses of 10.05%.

Three storylines drove this momentum: Rivian’s Q4 earnings that revealed hidden strength, the imminent R2 launch, and software revenue growth reshaping the business model.

Rivian Q4 Earnings: Profitability Emerging Through the Noise Rivian’s February 11 earnings were immediately cheered by the market. Revenue of $1.29 billion beat estimates by $13 million, and automotive revenue plunged 45% year-over-year to $839 million. The culprit? A $270 million drop in regulatory credit sales and collapsing demand after the federal EV tax credit expired on September 30, 2025.

But the profitability story improved dramatically. Rivian posted $120 million in Q4 gross profit and $144 million for the full year, a $1.3 billion improvement from 2024’s losses. Cost of goods sold per vehicle improved by more than $7,200 year-over-year. CEO RJ Scaringe framed it clearly: “In 2025 we focused on execution as we laid the foundation for dramatically scaling our business.”

The company beat EPS estimates, posting an adjusted loss of $0.53 versus the $0.67 expected loss. With $6.08 billion in cash and equivalents, Rivian has runway to reach the R2 launch without immediate financing pressure.

R2 Launch: Q2 2026 Timeline Solidifies The R2 SUV, Rivian’s answer to Tesla’s Model Y, is on track for first customer deliveries in Q2 2026. Manufacturing validation builds were completed in mid-January 2026, and Scaringe noted “early strong reviews of the R2 pre-production builds.” Additional product details will be revealed on March 12, 2026.

The company guides for 62,000 to 67,000 deliveries in 2026, up from 2025’s 42,247 units. R2 represents Rivian’s first mass-market vehicle, priced to compete directly where Tesla dominates. The 1.1 million square foot manufacturing expansion at the Normal facility is complete, positioning Rivian to scale production rapidly once R2 ramps.

Software Revenue Surge: The Volkswagen Effect The most overlooked storyline is software and services revenue, which exploded 109% year-over-year to $447 million in Q4. This growth came primarily from the Volkswagen Group joint venture, where Rivian provides vehicle electrical architecture and software development services.

While automotive revenue collapsed, software revenue grew sequentially from $416 million in Q3 to $447 million in Q4, cushioning the blow from vehicle sales. This segment now represents over a third of total revenue and carries significantly higher margins than vehicle manufacturing. If Rivian can maintain this trajectory while ramping R2 production, the business model starts to look less like a traditional automaker and more like a hybrid technology platform.

The week’s 19.8% gain suggests investors are looking past near-term delivery headwinds and focusing on structural improvements: unit economics turning positive, R2 on schedule, and a software business becoming material. With 2026 guidance calling for negative $2.1 billion to $1.8 billion adjusted EBITDA, profitability remains distant. But the trajectory is bending in the right direction, and the R2 launch could be the inflection point that determines whether Rivian survives the EV shakeout.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Ardent Health, Inc. (NYSE: ARDT) securities between July 18, 2024 and November 12, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until Monday, March 9, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Ardent Health class action lawsuit.  Captioned Postiwala v. Ardent Health, Inc., No. 26-cv-00022 (M.D. Tenn.), the Ardent Health class action lawsuit charges Ardent Health as well as certain of Ardent Health's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Ardent Health class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-ardent-health-inc-class-action-lawsuit-ardt.html 

You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected].

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Ardent Health owns and operates a network of hospitals and clinics that provide a range of healthcare services.

The Ardent Health class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Ardent Health did not primarily rely on "detailed reviews of historical collections" in determining collectability of accounts receivable nor did "management determine[] [when an] account is uncollectible"; (ii) Ardent Health's accounts receivable framework "utilized a 180-day cliff at which time an account became fully reserved," which allowed Ardent Health to report higher amounts of accounts receivable during the Class Period, and delay recognizing losses on uncollectable accounts; (iii) consequently, Ardent Health's reported financial position was materially false and misleading; (iv) Ardent Health did not maintain professional malpractice liability insurance in amounts "sufficient to cover claims arising out of [its] operations"; and (v) Ardent Health's professional liability reserves were insufficient to cover "significant social inflationary pressure in medical malpractice cases the past several years," which had been an "increasing dynamic year-over-year" in Ardent Health's New Mexico market.

The Ardent Health class action lawsuit further alleges that on November 12, 2025, Ardent Health revealed a $43 million decrease in third quarter 2025 revenue, which resulted from revised determinations of accounts receivable collectability after Ardent Health transitioned to a new revenue accounting system and from purported "recently completed hindsight evaluations of historical collection trends."  Ardent Health also allegedly announced a cut to 2025 EBITDA guidance of $57.5 million at the midpoint, or about 9.6%, from $575 million – $615 million to $530 million – $555 million because of "persistent industry-wide cost pressures," including "payer denials."  In addition, the complaint alleges Ardent Health recorded a $54 million increase in professional liability reserves "with respect to recent settlements and ongoing litigation arising from a limited set of claims between 2019 and 2022 in New Mexico" as well as "consideration of broader industry trends, including social inflationary pressures."  On this news, the price of Ardent Health stock fell nearly 34%, according to the Ardent Health class action lawsuit.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Ardent Health securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Ardent Health class action lawsuit.  A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class.  A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Ardent Health investor class action lawsuit.  The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Ardent Health shareholder class action lawsuit.  An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Ardent Health class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation.  Our Firm ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report, recovering more than $916 million for investors in 2025.  This marks our fourth #1 ranking in the past five years.  And in those five years alone, Robbins Geller recovered $8.4 billion for investors – $3.4 billion more than any other law firm.  With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig.  Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
J.C. Sanchez
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
800-449-4900
[email protected] 

SOURCE Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) between October 28, 2024 and October 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important February 17, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased F5 securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the F5 class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=46672 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 17, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to F5's projected revenue outlook and anticipated growth while also minimizing risk from seasonality and macroeconomic fluctuations. In truth, F5's optimistic claims, touting its purported best-in-industry security and overall emphasis and confidence in F5's ability to meet and capitalize on the growing security needs for its clientele fell short of reality; F5 was, at the time, the subject of a significant security incident, placing its clientele's security and F5's future prospects at significant risk. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the F5 class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=46672 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/283920

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

The current economic run may be premature, with consumer behavior not fully supporting the growth. Stimulating financial markets does not necessarily lead to increased household consumption. High market euphoria could lead to corrections in the near term.

Key Takeaways The current economic run may be premature, with consumer behavior not fully supporting the growth. Stimulating financial markets does not necessarily lead to increased household consumption. High market euphoria could lead to corrections in the near term. Risk appetite indicators suggest increased market volatility. There’s a notable sector rotation occurring, with some sectors thriving while big tech lags. The market setup resembles past conditions that were challenging for big tech. Large cap tech’s increased capital expenditures may negatively impact cash flow. High yield credit spreads are low, indicating a market rotation rather than a collapse. Divergence in earnings growth between large tech and smaller sectors suggests a need for investment strategy adjustments. The Russell index’s recent performance contrasts with large cap tech’s stagnation. Financing costs from capital expenditures in large tech could hurt cash flow. Market sentiment is at a high, with potential corrections looming. Guest intro Tyler Neville is a Partner at Corriente Advisors, a macro thematic hedge fund based in Fort Worth, Texas that focuses on bitcoin and crypto investments. Previously, he spent a decade as a buy-side equity and derivatives trader at multiple hedge funds and Franklin Templeton, and served as Senior Editor at Blockworks covering the convergence of macro finance and crypto markets. His background spanning traditional finance, digital assets, and macro analysis positions him to discuss market rotations, Fed policy constraints, and bitcoin’s role in the current investment landscape.

The current economic landscape and consumer behavior The current economic run may be premature given the state of the consumer.

— Tyler Neville

I do think we’re still yet to see that the economy really catch gear so I’m a little nervous this run at hot is maybe ahead of its skis a bit.

— Tyler Neville

Stimulating financial markets does not equate to stimulating real household consumption. When we stimulate main street, main street doesn’t own financial assets so you can stimulate the financial markets you can stimulate real household consumption in main street and those are two different things.

— Tyler Neville

Understanding the disconnect between financial markets and consumer spending is crucial. The economic recovery might not be as robust as current market trends suggest. Consumer behavior trends are critical in assessing the sustainability of economic growth. Current indicators suggest caution in interpreting economic recovery signals. Market euphoria and potential corrections Current market euphoria may lead to corrections in the near term. Bullish sentiment rose to the highest since November 2024 while bearish and neutral sentiment fell… in two of those instances markets experienced a correction within three months.

— Tyler Neville

High bullish sentiment often precedes market corrections, posing risks for investors. The risk appetite indicator is at historically high levels, suggesting increased market volatility. Goldman’s risk appetite indicator has accelerated to the 90 percentile reading… at these levels small pullbacks tend to be more frequent and outsized equity returns are rare.

— Tyler Neville

Investors should be wary of high risk appetite levels, which often precede volatility. Market sentiment can be a precursor to corrections, highlighting the need for strategic caution. Understanding the implications of market sentiment is essential for anticipating future corrections. Sector rotation and big tech’s performance The market is experiencing a rotation where certain sectors are thriving while big tech is lagging. You start getting these effects that are market wide versus like you said there’s beneath the surface sectors popping off left and right.

— Tyler Neville

The current market setup resembles last year’s conditions, which could indicate potential headwinds for big tech. It feels like deja vu because early twenty twenty five I was pounding the drum… these names are are kind of fully loaded and you have headwinds.

— Tyler Neville

Sector performance varies, with some sectors outperforming big tech. Investors should consider sector rotation when making investment decisions. Big tech’s lagging performance could signal broader market trends. Understanding sector dynamics is crucial for strategic investment planning. Large cap tech and capital expenditures The next leg up in the market may be down, given the current performance of large cap tech and the Russell. You have the Russell up like eight days in a row or something like that… it doesn’t look like big tech wants to do anything and so the next step might be down.

— Tyler Neville

Increased capital expenditures in large cap tech are likely to hurt cash flow due to rising financing costs. The big difference is they weren’t doing crazy capex spend as as crazy as it is now and I think the financing costs of all that is probably going to hurt cash flow a little bit.

— Tyler Neville

Large cap tech’s financial strategies could impact their future cash flow. Investors should be aware of the implications of capital expenditures on cash flow. The Russell index’s performance contrasts with large cap tech’s stagnation. Understanding the relationship between capital expenditures and cash flow is critical for assessing large cap tech’s future. High yield credit spreads and market rotation High yield credit spreads are currently at a historically low level, indicating a rotation rather than an impending business collapse. You can see the high yield credit spreads currently that’s at the top left corner are at 308 basis points which is kind of wild in a in a recession… it’s just within spitting distance on high of complete lows… it’s not saying the things are gonna be out of business there’s it’s not gonna be an implosion etcetera it’s this is a rotation.

— Tyler Neville

Low credit spreads suggest a market rotation, not a collapse. Investors should understand the significance of credit spreads in economic cycles. The current market conditions indicate a nuanced understanding of economic indicators. Credit spreads provide insight into market health and business stability. Understanding credit spreads is essential for assessing market rotations. Current credit spreads offer a different narrative than a looming business collapse. Earnings growth and investment strategies The divergence in earnings growth between large tech companies and smaller sectors indicates a need for investors to adjust their exposure. The earnings rise in in large companies… those jaws have to close if if if they wanna do well.

— Tyler Neville

Earnings growth divergence suggests a need for strategic investment adjustments. Investors should consider adjusting their exposure based on earnings growth trends. Understanding earnings growth dynamics is crucial for investment strategy. The relationship between earnings growth and investment strategies can influence market decisions. Investors should be aware of how earnings growth impacts sector performance. Adapting investment strategies to earnings growth trends is essential for success. Market sentiment and potential risks Market sentiment is at a high, with potential corrections looming. High sentiment levels often precede market corrections, posing risks for investors. Understanding market sentiment is crucial for anticipating future risks. Investors should be cautious of high sentiment levels, which can signal impending corrections. Market sentiment can be a precursor to volatility, highlighting the need for strategic caution. The implications of market sentiment on future corrections are significant. High sentiment levels suggest a need for strategic investment planning. Investors should consider sentiment trends when making investment decisions. Financing costs and cash flow in large tech Financing costs from capital expenditures in large tech could hurt cash flow. Rising financing costs are likely to impact large cap tech’s future cash flow. Investors should be aware of the relationship between financing costs and cash flow. Understanding financing costs is critical for assessing large cap tech’s financial health. The impact of financing costs on cash flow is significant for large cap tech. Investors should consider financing costs when evaluating large cap tech’s future. The relationship between capital expenditures and financing costs is crucial for strategic planning. Understanding the financial strategies of large cap tech is essential for investment decisions.

Here's what happened to the Ripple ETFs in the past week.

It was three months ago when the wait was finally over for the XRP Army as the first spot exchange-traded fund tracking the performance of their favorite asset in the US launched.

The initial trading days were more than impressive, and a few more funds joined the Ripple fleet. However, the past week showed a rather worrying trend reversal.

XRP ETFs’ Demand Slows Canary Capital’s XRPC set a debut-day trading volume record in 2025 on its November 13 launch and remains the market leader despite the launch of four additional funds. It now holds more than $410 million in cumulative net inflows, followed by Bitwise’s XRP ($360 million) and Franklin Templeton’s XRPZ ($328 million).

The products went for over a month without a single red day in terms of net flows, and quickly surpassed the $1 billion mark. However, the green streak broke on January 7, and there were a few more painful days since then, including January 20, and the worst – January 29.

Nevertheless, most full trading weeks ended in the green, with total net inflows stabilizing above $1.20 billion. The past week, though, showed little interest despite three days being in the green. The net inflows were $6.31 million on Monday, $3.26 million on Tuesday, and $4.5 million on Friday, shows data from SoSoValue.

Thursday was a red day, with a net withdrawal of $6.42 million, while Wednesday’s trading volume was absent, with $0.00 in flows. Although the week ended slightly in the green ($7.65 million), the total number and individual daily performance clearly show a declining demand.

XRP ETF Flows. Source: SoSoValue But XRP Price Rockets Despite the lack of interest in the ETFs, the underlying asset’s price went through some intense volatility, especially during the weekend. The token recovered from last week’s plunge to $1.11 but was rejected at $1.55 and spent most of the past several days sitting around $1.40.

You may also like: XRP Set for Breakout? Analyst Flags Bullish Channel Ripple (XRP) During Crypto Winters: Here’s What You Need to Know XRP Holders Realize Major Losses as Price Decline Triggers Panic Selling The bulls went on the offensive in the past 48 hours, pushing the cryptocurrency to a multi-week peak of just over $1.65 earlier today. Nevertheless, XRP was rejected once again there and now sits around $1.55 once more.

Despite the retracement, XRP’s market cap remains well above $90 billion, placing it north of BNB for the battle for the fourth place in terms of that metric.

Tags:

Bonk breakout collides with heavy short positioning, setting up a potential volatility squeeze.

Charles Hoskinson argues that Bitcoin is overdue for reinvention, describing it as “2009 technology” despite billions of dollars in research and development across the broader blockchain sector.

Speaking at Consensus 2026, Hoskinson said that post-quantum upgrades represent an opportunity for Bitcoin to innovate rather than ignore advances achieved by competing networks.

Data from competing blockchains supports Hoskinson’s assertion. Since 2020, Solana has processed more than 103 billion transactions and handled 5.37 million in the past hour alone.

Moreover, Solana has achieved a real-time throughput of 1,492 transactions per second, with a theoretical ceiling of 65,000 tx/s. The 785 validators and a Nakamoto Coefficient of 19 reflect significant decentralization, while chain revenue and a low transaction fee of $0.006 indicate efficient, scalable financial operations.

Ethereum, launched in 2015, has processed 3.24 billion transactions and sustained 23.16 transactions per second (tx/s) over the past hour, with finality at approximately 12 minutes and 48 seconds. The nearly one million validators secure $74.14 billion in staked value, demonstrating strong economic security and extensive developer engagement across 411 repositories.

Advertisement  

By contrast, Bitcoin’s performance is deliberately conservative. With roughly 1.3 billion total transactions, its real-time throughput is at 10.18 tx/s, and block times average just over five minutes, achieving economic finality in about an hour.

That said, the Nakamoto Coefficient of three reveals concentrated mining influence, while its 128 miners and 901 EH/s hashrate provide unparalleled network security. However, development activity does not align with the throughput-focused expansion observed on other blockchains, despite a solid presence, with 1,922 developers across 22 repositories.

Meanwhile, Cardano currently processes 250 transactions per second, while the upcoming Hydra upgrade aims to increase throughput to potentially one million TPS, positioning it competitively against both Ethereum and Solana.

Hoskinson contends that the market must expand beyond finance, suggesting that services such as Tinder should be deployed on the blockchain. In his view, crypto’s next rally will be driven not just by money, but by gaming and mainstream applications that catalyze broader adoption.