Market Signal Briefing

The recent movement of two legendary “physical Bitcoins” worth more than $120 million has sparked intense discussion across the crypto community. On-chain analysts reported that two 1,000 BTC Casascius coins were transferred after remaining dormant on the Bitcoin blockchain for over 13 years, reigniting interest in one of crypto’s most iconic collectibles.

These funds originated from Casascius coins, early physical Bitcoin tokens created between 2011 and 2013 by Mike Caldwell. Designed to make Bitcoin tangible, these gold-plated brass coins and bars contained embedded private keys hidden beneath tamper-evident holographic stickers. To access the BTC stored inside, the owner must physically peel off the hologram, permanently altering the collectible and revealing the private key required to move the funds.

Casascius coins quickly became popular in Bitcoin’s early days, offering a way to conduct face-to-face crypto transactions. However, production ended in November 2013 after the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) determined that selling pre-funded physical Bitcoins qualified as money transmission, requiring regulatory compliance.

The recent transaction also prompted commentary from former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès. While clarifying that he did not own the massive 1,000 BTC gold bars, Karpelès revealed that he once held numerous smaller denomination Casascius coins during Mt. Gox’s peak. According to him, 25 BTC and 1 BTC physical coins were distributed to employees as performance bonuses.

When these coins were originally minted, a 25 BTC Casascius coin ranged in value from roughly $100 to $25,000, depending on Bitcoin’s market price at the time. Today, with Bitcoin trading near historic highs, a single 25 BTC coin is worth approximately $1.5 million, excluding the significant collector’s premium attached to unpeeled, pristine examples.

It remains unclear how many former Mt. Gox employees held onto their physical Bitcoins without redeeming them. As Bitcoin adoption continues to grow, these rare Casascius coins represent both a piece of crypto history and a multimillion-dollar asset class, blending blockchain technology with tangible collectibles.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Coinbase's recent actions led to a significant freeze in market momentum. Despite initial panic, the market is expected to recover. Elizabeth Warren's proposed amendments undermine the bill's purpose.

Key Takeaways Coinbase’s recent actions led to a significant freeze in market momentum. Despite initial panic, the market is expected to recover. Elizabeth Warren’s proposed amendments undermine the bill’s purpose. Failure of recent legislation affected stock prices but did not change their fundamental conditions. The legislation represents a major shift in capital markets, akin to the Howey test. The narrative that stablecoins will cause massive deposit outflows is not supported by evidence. Capping credit card interest rates could lead to revenue losses and canceled cards for high-risk customers. Legislation on stablecoin interest rates could result in a bullish market pause. A steepened yield curve indicates low short-term rates while long-term rates remain high. The housing market is facing unprecedented high costs for homes and capital. The proposed cap on interest rates is seen as a strategic move to influence the banking industry’s stance on stablecoin yields. The current economic conditions are creating challenges for potential homebuyers. Guest intro Michael Anderson is co-founder and partner at Framework Ventures, a leading crypto-native venture capital firm. He previously served as a product manager at Snapchat and Dropbox, where he helped build their monetization platforms, and co-founded Hashletes, a digital collectible startup with official NFL licensing that was successfully sold. Framework Ventures was among the first to focus exclusively on the DeFi ecosystem, making early investments in multi-billion dollar projects like Chainlink, Aave, Synthetix, and The Graph.

The freeze in market momentum caused by Coinbase The recent actions by Coinbase and Brian Armstrong caused a significant freeze in market momentum.

— Michael Anderson

Coinbase’s withdrawal of support led to a halt in market action and movement. The market experienced a temporary panic but is expected to recover. Brian Armstrong and Coinbase came out and said we do not support this we’re pulling our support that led kind of a total freeze in terms of you know action and momentum and movement.

— Michael Anderson

The market’s resilience is highlighted despite challenges from major players. Understanding the broader market conditions is crucial following Coinbase’s announcement. This situation exemplifies the influence major crypto platforms have on market dynamics. The freeze in momentum underscores the interconnectedness of market players. The impact of Elizabeth Warren’s amendments The amendments proposed by Elizabeth Warren negate the entire purpose of the bill.

— Michael Anderson

Warren’s amendments are extensive and undermine the bill’s objectives. The proposed changes highlight the complexities of legislative processes. The number of amendments that like you could see on the page from Warren was like an entire page of amendments which all of them put together negates the entire purpose of the bill.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the specific amendments is key to grasping their impact. The legislative intent is challenged by the volume of proposed changes. This situation reflects the contentious nature of financial legislation. The amendments illustrate the political challenges in passing financial reforms. The failure of legislation and its effects on stock prices The recent failure of legislation has impacted stock prices but hasn’t materially changed their conditions.

— Michael Anderson

Stock prices were affected by the legislative failure, though their conditions remained stable. The relationship between legislative actions and market performance is complex. I think really what that’s being labeled as is you know the failure of this act to get through at least on this pass has not materially changed the condition of their stock prices but it has impacted them.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the specific legislation is crucial for assessing its market impact. The legislative failure highlights the resilience of certain market sectors. This situation underscores the importance of legislative success for market confidence. The market’s response to legislative actions reflects broader economic sentiments. Landmark legislation and the Howey test This legislation is landmark and represents the biggest change in capital markets since the introduction of the Howey test.

— Michael Anderson

The proposed legislation is compared to the historical significance of the Howey test. This change introduces a new asset class to capital markets. This is landmark legislation for US capital markets it’s probably the biggest change in terms of adding a new asset class since you know the Howey test with securities.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the Howey test’s impact is key to appreciating this legislation. The potential for transformative change in capital markets is significant. This legislation exemplifies the evolving nature of financial regulations. The introduction of a new asset class highlights the dynamic nature of capital markets. Stablecoins and banking industry narratives The narrative that stablecoins will cause a massive outflow of deposits from the banking system is not supported by reality.

— Michael Anderson

The banking industry’s concerns about stablecoins are challenged by current evidence. Stablecoin yields are not causing significant deposit outflows from banks. I do think that it’s not just coincidental that the proposal to cap interest rates on credit cards happens at the exact same time that it seems like the banking industry is pushing to ensure that stablecoin yields are not possible… you still haven’t seen deposits leave the banking industry.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the relationship between stablecoin yields and banking deposits is crucial. This insight challenges prevalent narratives within the banking industry. The stability of banking deposits despite stablecoin growth is noteworthy. The narrative reflects broader tensions between traditional finance and digital assets. Consequences of capping credit card interest rates Capping credit card interest rates could lead to significant revenue losses for banks and result in canceled credit cards for high-risk customers.

— Michael Anderson

Proposed interest rate caps could negatively impact bank revenues. High-risk customers may face credit card cancellations due to capped rates. If you were to take Chase and say the 26 to 29% interest rate that you know Chase charges its customers is capped at 10%, revenue goes precipitously down… customers will end up finding out that their credit cards are canceled because they are in a risky band.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding interest rate impacts is key to assessing legislative consequences. The potential for revenue losses highlights the challenges of interest rate caps. This situation reflects broader debates on consumer protection and financial stability. The impact on high-risk customers underscores the complexities of financial regulation. Legislation and its impact on market dynamics Legislation around stablecoin interest rates could lead to a bullish market pause.

— Michael Anderson

Proposed legislation may create a temporary pause in bullish market trends. The strategic nature of interest rate caps is highlighted in this context. I think it’s pretty savvy if the overall intention… if that is the intention of basically pulling the banking industry back from stable coin yield and saying fine we’ll cap interest rates then we’ll see what it does… paradoxically this may be a bullish pause.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the legislative environment is crucial for market predictions. The potential for a bullish pause reflects the complexities of financial markets. This insight underscores the interplay between regulation and market dynamics. The strategic implications of legislative actions are significant for market participants. Understanding the steepened yield curve A steepened yield curve indicates low short-term rates while long-term rates remain high.

— Michael Anderson

The steepened yield curve reflects current interest rate dynamics. Short-term rates are expected to decrease while long-term rates stay elevated. I think generally what we expect is that rates will get cut and there will become this thing called you know like a steepened yield curve where the rates are really low at the short end but at the long end they’re still high.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding yield curves is key to grasping economic conditions. The steepened curve highlights the complexities of interest rate policies. This explanation reflects broader economic discussions on monetary policy. The yield curve’s shape provides insights into future economic trends. Challenges in the current housing market The current housing market is characterized by unprecedented high costs for both homes and capital.

— Michael Anderson

Homebuyers face dual pressures from high home prices and capital costs. The economic conditions are creating significant challenges for potential buyers. The cost of capital’s you know effectively never been higher but also the cost to buy the house has never been higher.

— Michael Anderson

Understanding the economic factors affecting the housing market is crucial. The unprecedented costs highlight the challenges of current market conditions. This insight reflects broader economic trends impacting the housing sector. The dual pressures on homebuyers underscore the complexities of the housing market.

MicroStrategy, now operating as Strategy, has reaffirmed that it can fully cover its $6 billion debt even if Bitcoin (BTC) plunges 88% to $8,000. The company currently holds approximately $49.3 billion in Bitcoin at an average reference price of $69,000 per BTC, positioning itself as one of the largest corporate Bitcoin holders. According to management, even in a severe downturn, its BTC reserves would match its net debt at $8,000, allowing it to meet obligations without forced liquidation.

The company emphasized that its staggered convertible note maturities extending through 2032 provide flexibility. CEO Phong Le noted that a hypothetical 90% Bitcoin price crash would likely unfold over years, giving Strategy time to refinance debt, issue equity, or restructure liabilities if necessary. At $8,000, the firm’s equity would effectively drop to zero, but assets would still equal liabilities, keeping the company technically solvent.

However, risks intensify if Bitcoin falls below that threshold. Around $7,000, loan-to-value ratios on secured Bitcoin-backed loans could breach covenant limits, triggering margin calls or collateral demands. In a weak liquidity environment, Strategy might be forced to sell Bitcoin, potentially accelerating broader crypto market declines.

At $6,000, insolvency risks increase as total liabilities would exceed asset value. Unsecured bondholders could face losses, and equity would resemble a highly speculative option on Bitcoin recovery. Further declines toward $5,000 could lead to forced liquidation by secured lenders, restructuring, or even bankruptcy.

Ultimately, the $8,000 Bitcoin price level is not a definitive survival line. The speed of BTC price declines, debt structure, and overall market liquidity will determine whether Strategy can withstand extreme crypto market volatility. As a major institutional Bitcoin holder, any stress event involving Strategy could significantly impact the broader cryptocurrency market, including ETFs, miners, and leveraged investors.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Journalist

Posted: February 16, 2026

ZCash [ZEC] rebounded from a key long-term support level at $187.9. In a recent report, AMBCrypto explored how the long-term bias of ZEC might not be as bearish as feared.

The weekly swing structure has held, and there was hope.

A recovery might not be imminent. With Bitcoin’s [BTC] bearish woes, ZEC might enter a deeper consolidation and fall below $187 in the coming weeks.

But, for now, the short-term momentum was bullish. According to CoinMarketCap, ZCash has rallied 9.88% in the past 24 hours with a 25% increase in daily trading volume.

The $300 resistance has been overcome, but the main threats overhead were at $365-$460.

What to expect from the ZEC price action this week Earlier, the importance of the $365-$450 supply zone was explained using the 1-day chart. Zooming into the lower timeframe price charts only reinforced this view.

Source: ZEC/USDT on TradingView

Using the H4 bearish impulse move to $184 and its Fibonacci retracement levels, we can see why $320 and $357 are key local resistances. To the south, there were imbalances in this timeframe at $300, $260, and $240.

The OBV has made new highs for the month of February, but the RSI and Stochastic RSI showed overbought conditions. This indicated a potential correction ahead.

The upcoming price dip might not extend as deep as $240. This was because of the $300 level, which was a local resistance that the price rocketed past and left behind an imbalance, or fair value gap, in the process.

ZEC will likely respect this and continue higher, although a few hours of consolidation could ensue.

Another compelling reason why ZEC will likely run higher before correcting was seen in the liquidation map. The $342 and $360 regions had considerable cumulative short liquidation leverage.

Since price is attracted to liquidity, a move higher seemed more likely in the coming days than a drop below $300.

At the same time, traders shouldn’t FOMO into long positions. Bitcoin tested the $70k resistance in recent hours and could see rejection over the next 24 hours. If it does, it can drag ZEC lower.

Final Summary The ZEC bulls have reclaimed the $300 former local resistance as support, at least for now. If Bitcoin does not see strong selling pressure in the near term, a ZEC move to $360 is more likely than a breakdown below $300. Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Ripple is positioning XRP as the core engine of its global financial infrastructure ambitions, with CEO Brad Garlinghouse signaling a path toward trillion-dollar status driven by institutional adoption, liquidity expansion, and ecosystem-wide integration.

Journalist

Posted: February 16, 2026

While the wider crypto market has been moving cautiously this February, a major on-chain transaction has suddenly grabbed attention.

According to Onchain Lens, a long-time crypto holder from the 2010–2011 era, often called a “Bitcoin OG,” has transferred 261,024 ETH, worth about $543 million, to Binance [BNB].

For more than ten years, this investor had kept their assets untouched through every major market rise and crash.

Sending such a large amount to the world’s biggest exchange often signals a possible plan to sell, which could affect the market.

However, the whale still holds over 808,000 ETH, valued at around $1.66 billion. This suggests they are not leaving crypto completely. Instead, they may simply be securing profits or adjusting their strategy.

Ethereum’s price action at the time of transfer The timing of this $543 million transfer is significant. When the early investor moved their funds to Binance, Ethereum [ETH] was trading at $2,089.30 and had risen slightly by 0.89% in the past 24 hours.

This small rise gave some short-term relief to retail traders. However, the bigger picture is still weak. Over the past month, ETH has fallen by 37%, showing that the market is still in a strong downtrend.

When a large investor sends such a huge amount to an exchange during a small price bounce, it often means they are planning to sell while prices are temporarily higher.

A similar pattern appeared in December, when TradingView’s Whale Hunter Indicator showed big investors selling during small dips of 3% to 8%, which stopped prices from going higher.

Technical signs still look weak Meanwhile, the technical indicators also point to caution.

The RSI remains low, suggesting that sellers are still in control, and the MACD has shown small positive signs, with short green bars appearing.

Source: Trading View

However, both lines are still below normal levels, meaning the recovery is weak and not yet a real trend change.

Big investors are also becoming more careful. On 13th February, Ethereum ETFs saw a small inflow of $10.2 million.

But on the 11 and 12th of February, they recorded much larger outflows totaling $242.2 million, according to Farside Investors.

Traders are losing confidence Another worrying sign is the steady fall in Open Interest (OI) in Ethereum derivatives. Since August 2025, OI has been declining, meaning fewer traders are keeping open positions.

Source: Coinglass

Simply put, traders are not just losing money; they are losing interest. When Open Interest falls along with prices, it usually means people are closing their trades and leaving the market instead of buying more.

Overall, the massive whale transfer, weak market signals, and falling confidence suggest Ethereum remains fragile, with investors closely watching for the next major move.

Final Summary Despite the massive transfers, the whale is still holding a large amount of Ethereum, suggesting a strategy, not panic. Technical indicators like RSI and MACD continue to warn that sellers are still in control.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Bitcoin might crash toward $45,225 soon. Market analyst Ali Martinez dropped this bomb on X, pointing to the Cumulative Value – Days Destroyed indicator that’s been nailing Bitcoin cycle bottoms since 2012 with scary accuracy.

The CVDD metric digs into how long-term Bitcoin holders behave when they finally move their coins. Coin Days Destroyed tracks Bitcoin sitting untouched in wallets – the longer it sits, the more “coin days” pile up. When holders finally spend these old coins, it destroys those accumulated days. CVDD takes this data and builds a model around the historical value of destroyed coin days, creating what many consider the most reliable floor for Bitcoin prices. Martinez has been tracking this indicator for years, watching it call major bottoms with precision that makes traditional analysts jealous.

CVDD nailed every major low.

The 2015 bear market saw Bitcoin collapse, but CVDD caught the exact bottom. Same story in 2018 when crypto winter froze everything solid – CVDD marked the precise moment to buy. And when 2022’s brutal selloff crushed dreams and portfolios, CVDD again pinpointed the turning point. Martinez’s analysis shows Bitcoin either touches this line or briefly dips below before rockets launch toward new highs.

Right now, Bitcoin’s trading around $70,000 after a decent 2% bounce. But that CVDD line sits way down at $45,225, creating a massive gap that’s got traders nervous. The distance between current prices and this historical safety net tells a story about market health. When Bitcoin trades far above CVDD, it often means the party might end soon. When it gets close, smart money usually starts backing up the truck.

Things get interesting fast.

Martinez’s February 14th warning came with charts showing how Bitcoin behaves around CVDD levels. The data’s pretty clear – every time Bitcoin approached this line, it marked the end of major selloffs and the start of new bull runs. Traders who bought near CVDD levels in previous cycles made fortunes. But getting there often meant watching portfolios bleed for months.

Institutional players aren’t sleeping on this metric either. Reports from hedge fund circles suggest big money’s watching CVDD like hawks, ready to pounce if Bitcoin drops toward $45,225. These funds have teams of quants who’ve backtested CVDD’s performance across multiple cycles. The results convinced them it’s worth betting serious money on.

Trading volumes tell their own story. February 2026 data from major exchanges shows futures activity picking up as traders position for potential volatility. Binance and Coinbase both reported increased options trading around the $45,000-$50,000 strike prices. Smart money’s hedging bets, preparing for either a crash toward CVDD or a continued rally above $70,000. For more details, see MicroStrategy Says It Can Handle Bitcoin.

Crypto strategist Michael van de Poppe threw some cold water on blind CVDD faith during his February 14th analysis. He said macroeconomic factors could override historical patterns this time. Van de Poppe’s been around long enough to remember when traditional metrics failed during unprecedented market conditions. But even he admits CVDD’s track record makes it hard to ignore completely.

Grayscale Investments has teams monitoring Bitcoin’s relationship with CVDD levels daily. Sources close to the firm say they’re ready to adjust their Bitcoin Trust strategy if prices approach the $45,225 mark. Grayscale manages billions in crypto assets, so their moves could amplify any price action near CVDD levels.

The math behind CVDD gets complex, but the concept stays simple. Long-term holders eventually sell, and when they do, it creates measurable data points. CVDD captures this behavior and turns it into actionable price targets. Bitcoin’s entire 15-year history shows respect for these levels, making CVDD one of the few indicators that actually works in crypto’s wild west market.

Current market sentiment remains mixed despite Bitcoin’s recent gains. Some traders see the gap between $70,000 and $45,225 as a buying opportunity if prices drop. Others worry that such a massive correction would destroy confidence and trigger even deeper selling. The crypto community’s split between bulls expecting new highs and bears preparing for CVDD tests.

Technical analysts beyond Martinez have started incorporating CVDD into their frameworks. The indicator’s simplicity appeals to traders tired of complex oscillators that fail during extreme market moves. CVDD just tracks real holder behavior – when they sell, when they hold, and what price levels matter most.

Recent whale activity adds another layer to the CVDD story. On-chain data shows large holders accumulating Bitcoin around current levels, but these same whales have historically been sellers when prices approach cycle tops. Their behavior near CVDD levels has been consistent – they buy aggressively when Bitcoin trades close to this metric. See also: Bitcoin falls below ,000 despite attempts.

Market makers on major exchanges are already adjusting their algorithms to account for potential CVDD tests. These firms use sophisticated models that incorporate historical support levels, and $45,225 has become a key input in their risk management systems. If Bitcoin starts dropping toward this level, automated buying could create significant support.

But markets don’t always follow scripts. Bitcoin’s volatility means a drop to $45,225 could happen fast, catching even prepared traders off guard. The crypto market’s 24/7 nature amplifies moves, turning gradual corrections into violent crashes overnight.

Martinez’s latest update on February 15th emphasized watching for any signs of Bitcoin edging toward the CVDD mark. Trading desks across major financial centers have CVDD levels programmed into their alert systems, ready to act when Bitcoin approaches this critical zone.

The $45,225 level represents more than just technical support – it’s become a psychological benchmark for the entire crypto industry.

MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor has referenced CVDD analysis in recent Bitcoin acquisition decisions, with the company’s $42 billion Bitcoin treasury creating additional support around key technical levels.

BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF prospectus mentions monitoring “realized value metrics” that include CVDD-style calculations. The asset manager’s $10 trillion in global assets could provide massive liquidity if Bitcoin approaches the $45,225 zone, potentially creating a floor effect that amplifies the indicator’s historical reliability.

Post Views: 13

Prefer us on Google

Whales accumulated 220 million ADA during recent price weakness.Rising Mean Coin Age signals long-term holders resisting distribution.Holding $0.271 support could open path toward $0.354.Cardano has shown early signs of stabilization after weeks of pressure. The ADA price is attempting a bounce from recent lows. Market data suggests the recovery is being supported by two key investor groups.

Large holders and long-term investors appear to be stepping in. Their activity is shaping short-term sentiment around the altcoin. As volatility persists across the crypto market, these cohorts may play a decisive role in ADA’s next move.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Cardano Holders Are Seemingly BullishOn-chain data indicates that Cardano whales have been consistently supportive. Addresses holding between 10 million and 100 million ADA have accumulated heavily in recent days. These wallets added more than 220 million ADA, valued at over $61 million at the time of writing.

Such accumulation during price weakness often reflects strategic positioning. Whales likely took advantage of discounted prices. Their buying signals conviction in ADA’s recovery potential.

Large-scale accumulation can also reduce circulating supply, which may support price stability in the near term.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Cardano Whale Holdings. Source: SantimentBeyond whale activity, long-term holders are reinforcing confidence. The Mean Coin Age metric, which tracks the average age of circulating coins, has been steadily increasing. This indicator reflects whether older coins are moving or remaining dormant.

During bear markets, a decline in Mean Coin Age often signals transactions and potential selling. However, the current rise places the metric at a three-month high.

Sponsored

Sponsored

This suggests long-term holders are opting to HODL rather than liquidate positions. Sustained dormancy typically indicates expectations of future ADA price appreciation.

Cardano MCA. Source: SantimentADA Price Breach On The CardsCardano price is trading at $0.278 at the time of writing. The altcoin is attempting to secure the $0.271 level, which aligns with the 23.6% Fibonacci Retracement. Holding this support would strengthen the bullish structure. A confirmed rebound could open the path toward $0.303.

Whale accumulation combined with long-term holder conviction may inject needed stability. If buying pressure continues, ADA could extend gains beyond $0.303.

The next resistance stands near $0.354. A decisive move above that zone could push Cardano toward $0.391, reinforcing recovery momentum.

Cardano Price Analysis. Source: TradingViewHowever, risks remain in volatile market conditions. If ADA fails to breach $0.303, sellers may regain control. Renewed pressure could force the price below the $0.271 support again.

A breakdown would likely expose $0.245 as the next downside target, invalidating the current bullish outlook.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Meanwhile, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s appointment to the CFTC advisory committee and robust demand for XRP-spot ETFs contributed to the recovery.

The rebound from February’s low supports the medium-term outlook. The projection hinges on crypto-related legislative developments, the Fed rate path, XRP utility, and XRP-spot ETF flows.

Below, I will explore the key drivers behind recent price trends, the medium-term (4-8 weeks) outlook, and the technical levels traders should watch.

Garlinghouse Joins CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee On Thursday, February 12, the CFTC announced the members of its Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC). Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse was among the 35 members of the Committee, which included Coinbase (COIN) CEO Brian Armstrong and Chair & CEO of Nasdaq Adena Friedman.

The establishment of the IAC underscored a marked shift in the US crypto regulatory landscape, favoring digital assets. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig stated:

“The IAC’s work will help ensure the CFTC’s decisions reflect market realities so the agency can future-proof its markets and develop clear rules of the road for the Golden Age of American Financial Markets.”

While the CFTC and the SEC support a more crypto-friendly regulatory landscape, the passing of crypto legislation remains key to longer-term adoption. Crucially, President Trump’s pro-crypto agenda paved the way for the shift in the regulatory landscape. A change in government could materially alter the agencies’ positions regarding oversight in the absence of crypto legislation.

Market Structure Bill in the Spotlight Importantly, crypto-friendly legislation would establish a clear statutory framework, regulatory certainty, and a more compelling prospect for crypto adoption. The absence of crypto legislation allowed the SEC, under Gary Gensler, to choose a regulatory stance on digital assets.

Growing optimism that the US Senate will pass the Market Structure Bill has boosted demand for XRP. Reports of a TradFi and DeFi standoff coming to an end have been key to XRP’s recent breakout above $1.5.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, a member of the IAC, expressed optimism over US banks and the DeFi space reaching an agreement, stating:

“Coinbase attended both recent White House meetings, and the crypto industry is aligned. We’re making good progress towards reaching a win-win-win between the White House, banks, and crypto, and we’ll keep advocating for what’s best for crypto users, especially core consumer benefits like rewards.”

XRP remains highly sensitive to crypto-related regulatory developments. In January, the token rallied from a December 31 low of $1.8103 to a January 6 high of $2.4151 after the US Senate Banking Committee announced its markup vote on its draft text for the Market Structure Bill.

However, delays to the Agriculture Committee’s markup vote and the Banking Committee’s postponement of its markup vote triggered a sell-off, sending XRP to a 2026 low of $1.1227.

For context, Coinbase withdrew its support for the US Senate Banking Committee’s draft text for the Market Structure Bill, leading to the Banking Committee postponing its markup vote. Brian Armstrong warned that the draft amendments would kill rewards on stablecoins, allowing banks to ban their competition.

Since then, crypto and banking representatives have attended two sessions at the White House, looking to find common ground on stablecoin rewards.

Crucially, the US Senate passing the Market Structure Bill could kickstart an XRP rally. On July 17, 2025, XRP surged 14.69% after the US House of Representatives passed the Market Structure Bill to the Senate. These price trends highlight the potential upside for XRP should the Market Structure Bill receive bipartisan support.

XRPUSD – Daily Chart – 160226 – Market Structure Bill XRP Price Forecast: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Targets Despite rebounding from February’s low of $1.1227, year-to-date losses support a cautiously bearish short-term outlook (1-4 weeks), with a target price of $1.0.

However, robust demand for XRP-spot ETFs, increased XRP utility, and hopes that the US Senate will pass the Market Structure Bill reinforce the bullish medium- to long-term price projections:

Medium-term (4-8 weeks): $2.5. Longer-term (8-12 weeks): $3.0. Key Downside Risks to the Bullish Medium-Term Outlook Several scenarios could unravel the constructive medium-term bias. These include:

A hawkish Bank of Japan, with a higher neutral interest rate (potentially 1.5%-2.5%). Multiple BoJ rate hikes could narrow US-Japan rate differentials in favor of the yen. Narrowing rate differentials may trigger a yen carry trade unwind, leading to a liquidity crunch, as seen in mid-2024. A yen carry trade unwind would affirm XRP’s short-term bearish structure. For context, the BoJ previously declared a wider neutral rate range of 1%-2.5% but stated it would announce a narrower range at a later date. Fading bets on an H1 2026 Fed rate cut. Delays and/or partisan opposition to the Market Structure Bill. Extended periods of XRP-spot ETF net outflows. These events would weigh on XRP, push the token toward $1.0, and reaffirm the cautiously bearish short-term outlook.

Technical Analysis: Levels to Watch XRP fell 2.25% on February 14, partially reversing the previous day’s 7.23% rally to close at $1.4750. The token tracked the broader crypto market cap, which declined by 1.98%.

While XRP snapped a five-week losing streak in the week ending February 15, the token remained well below its 50-day and 200-day EMAs. The EMA positions signaled a bearish bias. However, the 50-day EMA has flattened, suggesting a potential shift in technicals. Additionally, several positive fundamentals continue to counter bearish technicals, supporting the bullish medium-term outlook.

Nevertheless, short-term technicals remain bearish despite improving fundamentals.

Key technical levels to watch include:

Support levels: $1.0, and then $0.7773. 50-day EMA resistance: $1.7326. 200-day EMA resistance: $2.1436. Resistance levels: $1.5, $2.0, $2.5, and $3.0. On the daily chart, a breakout above $1.50 would bring the 50-day EMA into play. A sustained move through the 50-day EMA would signal a near-term bullish trend reversal. A bullish trend reversal would open the door to testing the 200-day EMA.

A sustained break above the EMAs would affirm a bullish trend reversal and support the medium- to longer-term price targets.

Bitcoin price failed to stay above $70,000 and started another decline. BTC is now trading below $68,800 and might extend losses in the near term.

Bitcoin is slowly moving lower below $69,500 and $69,200. The price is trading near $68,400 and the 100 hourly simple moving average. There was a break below a bullish trend line with support at $69,500 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair (data feed from Kraken). The pair might dip again if it trades below the $68,400 and $68,000 levels. Bitcoin Price Dips Again Bitcoin price failed to remain stable above the $70,000 zone. BTC started a fresh decline and traded below the $69,200 support zone. There was a push below $69,000.

The price dipped below the 38.2% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $65,072 swing low to the $70,935 high. Besides, there was a break below a bullish trend line with support at $69,500 on the hourly chart of the BTC/USD pair.

Bitcoin is now trading near $68,400 and the 100 hourly simple moving average. If the price remains stable above $68,000, it could attempt a fresh increase. Immediate resistance is near the $68,800 level.

Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com The first key resistance is near the $69,500 level. A close above the $69,500 resistance might send the price further higher. In the stated case, the price could rise and test the $70,000 resistance. Any more gains might send the price toward the $70,500 level. The next barrier for the bulls could be $72,000 and $72,500.

More Losses In BTC? If Bitcoin fails to rise above the $69,500 resistance zone, it could start another decline. Immediate support is near the $68,200 level. The first major support is near the $68,000 level or the 50% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $65,072 swing low to the $70,935 high.

The next support is now near the $67,350 zone. Any more losses might send the price toward the $67,350 support in the near term. The main support now sits at $66,500, below which BTC might struggle to recover in the near term.

Technical indicators:

Hourly MACD – The MACD is now gaining pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for BTC/USD is now below the 50 level.

Major Support Levels – $68,000, followed by $66,500.

Major Resistance Levels – $69,500 and $70,000.

TLDR: Fear and Greed Index drops to 8, matching extreme levels seen during 2018, 2020, and 2022 market bottoms Whale accumulation activity increases despite negative sentiment, creating divergence that preceded past rallies Behavioral finance principles show loss aversion and herd behavior drive extended sentiment recovery periods Major investors including MicroStrategy and ARK continue building positions during the extreme fear phase The Fear and Greed Index for cryptocurrency markets has dropped to extreme fear territory, registering a reading of 8 according to recent market data.

This sentiment indicator, which tracks Bitcoin-centered market psychology through multiple metrics, has reached levels historically associated with major market bottoms.

The current reading reflects widespread investor caution and risk aversion across the digital asset space. Meanwhile, on-chain data suggests large holders continue to accumulate positions despite the prevailing negative sentiment.

Historical Patterns Point to Extended Bottom Formation The Crypto Fear & Greed Index provided by Alternative.me combines several market factors to gauge investor sentiment.

These components include price volatility, trading volume, social media activity, Bitcoin dominance, and Google search trends. The index transforms these data points into a single metric that reflects overall market psychology.

Current extreme fear readings mirror conditions seen during previous major market stress events. The 2018 bear market bottom, the March 2020 pandemic crash, and the 2022 FTX collapse all displayed similar sentiment levels.

During each episode, the index fell below 10 as participants prioritized capital preservation over growth opportunities.

Cryptoquant researcher XWIN Research Japan notes that behavioral finance principles explain the current market state. Loss aversion drives investors to reduce exposure after experiencing portfolio declines.

Herd behavior reinforces this pattern as market participants collectively withdraw from risk assets. Consequently, sentiment typically recovers at a slower pace than price movements.

Source: Cryptoquant

The analysis emphasizes that extreme fear does not guarantee immediate market recovery. Historical data shows these conditions often mark the early stages of bottom formation rather than trend reversals.

Market confidence and capital inflows require time to rebuild after significant drawdowns. This suggests the current phase represents a psychological reset period for crypto markets.

Accumulation Activity Emerges Despite Negative Sentiment Trader Kyle Chassé observed on social media that whale accumulation patterns have emerged alongside the extreme fear reading.

He noted that this divergence between sentiment and large holder behavior has preceded major Bitcoin bottoms in previous cycles. The combination of retail fear and institutional buying has historically signaled favorable risk-reward conditions.

Fear & Greed just hit 8 while whales quietly accumulated.

That just so happens to be the exact divergence that has marked every major Bitcoin bottom before.

Some whales are accumulating loudly.

Saylor wants more.

Tom Lee says he'd buy $ETH if it crashed.

ARK bought more… pic.twitter.com/QvR4SnjWOG

— Kyle Chassé 🐸 (@Kylechasse) February 15, 2026

Several prominent market participants have increased their cryptocurrency exposure recently. MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor has publicly stated his intention to acquire additional Bitcoin.

Investment firm ARKd has purchased shares of cryptocurrency-related equities during the recent decline. Analyst Tom Lee indicated he would increase allocations if Ethereum reached specific lower price targets.

These accumulation patterns contrast sharply with the fearful sentiment reflected in the index. Large holders often build positions when retail investors exit the market.

This counter-cyclical behavior has characterized previous market bottoms across multiple asset classes. The current environment displays similar dynamics between different investor cohorts.

Market observers note that extreme sentiment readings alone do not determine timing for recovery. However, the combination of oversold conditions and whale accumulation has historically preceded bull market phases.

The cryptocurrency market remains in a consolidation period as prices stabilize and sentiment gradually improves.

Grayscale has taken another step toward expanding crypto investment products in the US, filing to convert its existing Aave trust into an exchange-traded fund listed on a major stock exchange.

The move matters because it signals renewed institutional interest in altcoins beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, even as the broader crypto market remains under pressure.

What Grayscale Filed and What Changes On Friday, Grayscale submitted a Form S-1 registration statement to the US Securities and Exchange Commission seeking approval to convert its Aave trust into the Grayscale Aave Trust ETF.

If approved, the fund would list on NYSE Arca under the ticker GAVE, charge a 2.5 percent management fee, and rely on Coinbase as both custodian and prime broker.

Unlike strategy-based products, the ETF would hold AAVE tokens directly, offering spot exposure to the decentralized finance protocol.

Context: Why Aave Matters to Institutions Aave is the largest decentralized finance platform by total value locked, with more than $27 billion locked across its markets, according to DefiLlama.

The protocol allows users to lend and borrow crypto across multiple blockchains, while the AAVE token plays a governance role and can be staked to earn yield. That combination of scale, revenue generation, and on-chain utility has made Aave one of the few DeFi protocols institutions consistently track.

Market Reaction Remains Muted The filing did not trigger a sharp reaction in the AAVE token. According to CoinGecko, AAVE was down 1.6 percent over the past day, trading near $126 at the time of reporting.

The subdued response reflects how ETF filings are increasingly seen as long-term positioning rather than immediate catalysts, especially during periods of softer market sentiment.

Grayscale Joins Bitwise in the Aave ETF Race With this filing, Grayscale becomes the second firm seeking US approval for an Aave-focused ETF, joining Bitwise.

Bitwise filed with the SEC in December to launch the Bitwise AAVE Strategy ETF, part of a broader push that also targeted altcoins such as Uniswap’s UNI and Zcash. Its proposal would allocate up to 60 percent of assets directly to AAVE tokens, with the remainder held in related securities.

Grayscale’s approach differs by aiming for full, direct exposure to AAVE rather than a blended strategy.

Investor Psychology Behind the Push The timing suggests asset managers believe investor appetite for altcoins has not disappeared, only become more selective.

While retail participation has cooled, institutions appear focused on protocols with deep liquidity, long operating histories, and clear on-chain use cases. Aave fits that profile more closely than many smaller DeFi projects.

Global Context Adds Pressure on US Regulators Outside the US, Aave-linked exchange-traded products already exist. 21Shares launched an Aave ETP on Nasdaq Stockholm in November, while Global X introduced a similar product in Germany in early 2023.

These overseas listings add to the pressure on US regulators as American investors seek comparable access through domestic markets.

What Comes Next Approval is far from guaranteed, but Grayscale’s filing reinforces a broader trend. Asset managers are increasingly testing how far the ETF wrapper can be extended into decentralized finance.

If successful, Aave-focused ETFs could open a new channel of capital into DeFi, while also setting precedents for other protocol-based funds.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are volatile and risky. Always conduct your research before making any investment decisions

The small modular reactor (SMR) nuclear energy company is down 70% from its recent peak.

NuScale Power (SMR +2.14%) stock has benefited from positive tailwinds surrounding the nuclear energy industry and taken investors for a roller-coaster ride. Last year, the stock peaked at $57 per share, but since then it has fallen 70%.

NuScale is an early-stage small modular reactor company that will likely continue to experience significant price swings in the coming years as it establishes its business and operating model. For investors considering an investment in the nuclear energy company, here's what to watch for over the next five years.

Today's Change

(

2.14

%) $

0.30

Current Price

$

14.29

NuScale Power has its work cut out for it over the next few years NuScale is in its early stages, and one of the most important things it needs to do is secure firm contract agreements. The company has entered into some high-profile partnerships, but many are non-binding or memoranda of understanding (MOU) that lack firm commitments.

For example, NuScale's RoPower project in Romania aims to deploy six NuScale Power Modules. It is the company's only active major project since its Carbon Free Power Project in Idaho was cancelled in 2023 due to ballooning costs. Shareholders of Romanian nuclear operator Nuclearelectrica (which is a joint owner in RoPower) have approved the Final Investment Decision (FID), on the condition that it would test one 77MW reactor first, then move forward with the final five units if the trial is successful.

The FID is a big step forward for NuScale; however, the facility likely won't be operational until at least July 2033, a pushback from its original 2030 timeline.

The company also has an MOU with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) through its partnership with ENTRA1 Energy. As part of this agreement, NuScale would develop up to 6 gigawatts (GW) of capacity for the TVA. Again, this agreement is non-binding, but it has triggered significant financial liabilities under its Partnership Milestones Agreement (PMA) with ENTRA1. In the third quarter, NuScale took an expense of $495 million related to this.

Image source: Getty Images.

On top of this, NuScale needs to establish a manufacturing supply chain and demonstrate that it can produce its NuScale Power Modules at scale in a factory setting. Building out these facilities will require significant capital, and management has noted that total payments for large projects could exceed billions of dollars before operations begin.

NuScale is a risky, early-stage company NuScale faces competition from up-and-coming companies and more established competitors. Oklo is an upstart company that uses liquid-metal cooling and plans to run on recycled nuclear fuel. Meanwhile, GE Vernova is more established and has its GE Hitachi BWRX-300, which was selected by the TVA for its Clinch River site, and is further along than NuScale's project with the TVA.

NuScale Power has its work cut out for it. It still needs to lock in firm commitments for its technology, and even then, it will take several years before it has commercial operations. While its technology is intriguing and could change the way nuclear power is deployed, it is still years away from operating. For that reason, most investors are best off avoiding the stock for now.

HomeEarnings AnalysisConsumer 

SummaryBoston Pizza remains a compelling 'Buy' with a +25% upside, driven by resilient same-store sales and robust distributable cash growth.BPZZF's royalty model insulates it from restaurant-level margin pressures, relying on gross sales and fixed-price promotions to sustain distributions.Distributable cash rose 5.1% in Q4, with payout ratios healthy when excluding special dividends; same-store sales growth is crucial for ongoing dividend increases.Management is targeting new store openings and promotional initiatives in FY 2026 to offset macro headwinds and maintain momentum. rustycanuck/iStock Editorial via Getty Images

Another quarter in the books, and the market still treats Boston Pizza (BPZZF) as nothing more than a royalty machine.

Since the upgrade to 'Buy,' unitholders have picked up nearly 20% in total returns versus just 6% for

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Freightways Group Limited (FTWYF) Q2 2026 Earnings Call February 15, 2026 4:00 PM EST

Company Participants

Mark Troughear - Chief Executive Officer
Stephan Deschamps - Chief Financial Officer
Aaron Stubbing
Neil Wilson

Conference Call Participants

Andy Bowley - Forsyth Barr Group Ltd., Research Division
Wade Gardiner - Craigs Investment Partners Limited, Research Division
Grant Lowe - Jarden Limited, Research Division
Ian Munro - Ord Minnett Limited, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, and thank you for joining the Freightways Half Year Announcement. We will begin with a presentation by Freightways management team followed by a Q&A session. [Operator Instructions]

Now I'll hand across to the Freightways management team. Over to you, Mark.

Mark Troughear
Chief Executive Officer

Thanks very much, and welcome, everybody, to the Freightways Half Year 2026 Results. Here in the room with me is, as usual, Aaron Stubbing, who heads up Express Package in New Zealand; Stephan Deschamps, CFO; and Neil Wilson, who looks after our Australian businesses and the Information Management division.

First thing we just mentioned is just a terrible weather down the Lower North Island Wellington area, be affecting a lot of people. Certainly, we have people off the roads down in those areas, particularly DX Mail and our Express businesses that are affected by the wind and the weather conditions down there. So we wish them well today. And I think by this afternoon, things are looking a little more positive, and we'll be back on the road down there.

Big thank you also to all of our teams across New Zealand and Australia. Really, every business has put in a pretty meritable performance over the half year. And so ,I'd just like to thank all of those staff and contractors throughout all of those businesses. And a big welcome to the VTFE team as of 2 weeks ago in Melbourne, who joined

Warner Bros Discovery might have to take David Ellison’s barely sweetened offer for the media giant, after all, The Post has learned.

As we reported last week, the firm known as WBD that controls that iconic Warner Bros. studio, HBO Max streaming service and cable properties like CNN and Discovery has been under massive pressure to reopen the entire bidding process and consider a “sweetened” offer from Paramount Skydance.

That, in turn, could upend its nearly sealed, $72 billion deal with Netflix for the studio and streaming service and force it to reconsider the bid by Paramount for all its operations.

Paramount, led by David Ellison, offered a sweetened deal to Warner Bros Discovery. AP Its decision is expected imminently, people close to the matter say. If WBD does reopen the process, it will have less to do with the recent barely enhanced offer by Paramount — where it didn’t increase its all cash $78 billion bid other than agreeing to cover a breakup fee to walk away from Netflix.

More at issue, as previously reported by The Post, is the guarantee of intense regulatory pushback by the antitrust cops in the Trump administration – not just on the deal itself, where Netflix is layering the top streaming service with the No 3 largest in HBO Max, but also scrutiny coming down hard on Netflix itself.

According to one GOP operative with knowledge of the Trump administration position of the Netflix deal: “So far it’s going nowhere with the executive branch.”

The tenor or the regulatory pushback against the Netflix offer — just weeks before WBD shareholders are expected to vote on it — has rattled people inside WBD. Its deal savvy CEO David Zaslav launched the months-long bidding process before settling on Netflix and getting a tremendous boost in WBD’s stock. But in recent days amid the regulatory heat, he’s been looking at a plan-B.

He is said to holding out hope for Paramount – backed by the CEO David Ellison, his mega billionaire father and Oracle co founder Larry Ellison and Redbird Capital – to add a couple more dollars to their $30 a share offer, bringing to total package to above $85 billion and well surpassing anything that Netflix could offer beyond its $27.75 a share, all-cash bid that relies on the uncertain value of selling WBD’s cable properties.

Netflix will have a chance to match any Paramount bid if the deal is reopened by the board this week. But its deal is already heavily reliant on debt and its stock price has tanked during the bidding drama so its appetite to throw money at its $73 billion offer is unclear.

Reps for WBD and Netflix had no immediate comment.

People inside the Ellison camp say as of Sunday night they have received no word from WBD on reopening the process. There is some feeling that WBD is leaking news it might just to protect itself from potential litigation — Paramount has already sued the company stating that it’s ignoring its superior offer because of a friendship between Zaslav and Sarandos.

But such a ploy to merely check the boxes is running into the reality of the regulatory mountain Netflix faces. Any review by DOJ antitrust would take six months and maybe longer now that the agency’s chief Gail Slater resigned amid pressure inside the White House.

Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday.

Thanks for signing up!

If the DOJ rejects the deal and Netflix litigates to get its approval that could take another year of uncertainty.

As reported, the DOJ antitrust is looking at whether Netflix business itself represents a streaming monopoly, giving the company immense pricing power in an increasingly popular mode of entertainment for the US consumer.

Netflix has argued it isn’t close to a monopoly since it has intense competition from social media like YouTube, where millions of Americans including young people enjoy programming. That argument is facing an uphill battle with DOJ antitrust as word go the regulatory hurdles faced by the streaming giant grew more intense in recent days.

Meanwhile, powerful GOP lawmakers worry not just about Netflix’s market power but its power over the culture; during a recent Senate subcommittee hearing on antitrust they lashed out at Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos for pushing woke programming on the American public, that supported progressive causes such as transgenderism, as well as the left-wing political causes supporter by Netflix founder Reed Hastings.

Yet another reason why WBD might just find it easier to take the money from the Ellison and run.

WEC Energy Group is rated hold, with a 41.8% upside tied to executing its $37.5 billion capital plan (2026–2030). WEC projects 7%–8% EPS CAGR, targeting $8 EPS by 2030, driven by rising data center demand and electric segment growth. The capital plan allocates $20.3 billion to electric generation, supporting a 6%–8% electric sales CAGR and potential revenue growth to $11 billion by 2028.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Nidec Corporation (OTC: NJDCY) resulting from allegations that Nidec may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Nidec securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=47559 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On September 3, 2025, after market close, CNBC published an article entitled "Nidec shares plunge 22% as China unit probe finds accounting issues tied to management." The article further stated that shares of Nidec fell "after the company announced a probe into allegations of improper accounting in its group. This marks the largest one-day drop in the Japanese electronics components manufacturer's shares."

On this news, Nidec's American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") fell 22.7% on September 4, 2025.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/284007

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Ardent Health, Inc. (NYSE: ARDT) between July 18, 2024 and November 12, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important March 9, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Ardent Health securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Ardent Health class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50392 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 9, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made misrepresentations regarding Ardent Health's accounts receivable. Defendants publicly reported Ardent Health's accounts receivable on a quarterly basis. They further stated that Ardent Health employed an active monitoring process to determine the collectability of its accounts receivable, and that this process included "detailed reviews of historical collections" as a "primary source of information." Further, defendants represented that Ardent Health considered "trends in federal and state governmental healthcare coverage" and that its "management determines [when an] account is uncollectible, at which time the account is written off." When defendants began to reveal increased claim denials by third-party payors, they downplayed the issue, stating that the increased payor denials were "turning [] more into a slow pay versus not getting paid," and did not write-off the uncollectible accounts. In addition, defendants represented that Ardent Health maintained professional malpractice liability insurance in amounts "sufficient to cover claims arising out of [its] operations[.]" In truth, Ardent Health did not primarily rely on "detailed reviews of historical collections" in determining collectability of accounts receivable nor did "management determine[] [when an] account is uncollectible." Instead, Ardent Health's accounts receivable framework "utilized a 180-day cliff at which time an account became fully reserved." This allowed Ardent Health to report higher amounts of accounts receivable during the Class Period, and delay recognizing losses on uncollectable accounts. And Ardent Health did not even maintain professional malpractice liability insurance in amounts "sufficient to cover claims arising out of [its] operations[.]" In truth, Ardent Health's professional liability reserves were insufficient to cover "significant social inflationary pressure in medical malpractice cases the past several years," which had been an "increasing dynamic year-over-year" in Ardent Health's New Mexico market. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Ardent Health class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50392 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/284002

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

HomeStock IdeasQuick Picks & Lists

SummaryThe London Company Mid Cap portfolio returned 3.2% (3.0% net) during the quarter vs. a 0.2% increase in the Russell Midcap Index.Dollar Tree, Inc. was a top performer after completing the divestiture of the Family Dollar business, removing a long-standing drag on growth.AerCap Holdings shares performed well all year after reporting solid quarterly results as the company owns the largest portfolio of aircraft.Churchill Downs Inc. outperformed on strong results led by growth from its HRM facilities and increasing optimism regarding 2026.Cooper Companies is a global medical device company operating two divisions: CooperVision (contact lenses) and CooperSurgical (women's healthcare products). champc/iStock via Getty Images

The following segment was excerpted from this fund letter.

The London Company Mid Cap portfolio returned 3.2% (3.0% net) during the quarter vs. a 0.2% increase in the Russell Midcap Index. Both stock selection and sector exposure were tailwinds to relative

Oil consolidates in the morning Asian session, but could be weighed by prospects of OPEC+ supply increases.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Paysafe Limited (NYSE: PSFE) between March 4, 2025 and November 12, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 7, 2026.

So What: If you purchased Paysafe securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 7, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Paysafe's ecommerce business had significant exposure to a single high risk client; (2) as a result, Paysafe's credit loss reserves and/or write-offs were understated; (3) Paysafe had an undisclosed issue with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, making its client services difficult to bank; (4) the foregoing issues were likely to have a material negative impact on Paysafe's revenue growth and overall revenue mix; (5) as a result, Paysafe was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025; and (6) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Paysafe's  business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50622or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

      Laurence Rosen, Esq.
      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
      275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 686-1060
      Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      [email protected]
      www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

Apple stock has posted respectable gains on the market over the past six months, but its supplier partner has been a better investment.

Shares of tech giant Apple (AAPL 2.27%) have clocked respectable gains of 11.6% on the market in the past six months, outpacing the 5.8% jump in the S&P 500 index over the same period.

The "Magnificent Seven" stock benefits from the robust demand for its latest iPhone offering. Strong iPhone sales helped Apple's revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 rise by 16% from the year-ago period to almost $144 billion, while adjusted earnings per share increased by 19%.

Apple could continue to outperform the broader market in the future thanks to the growing adoption of generative AI smartphones, as well as the strong performance of its high-margin services business. However, there may be a better way to capitalize on the AI smartphone market's growth: Apple supplier Cirrus Logic (CRUS +1.81%).

Let's see why that may be the case.

Image source: Getty Images.

Cirrus Logic is cheaper than Apple and is growing at a steady pace Cirrus Logic stock has jumped 33% in the past six months, almost double the gains clocked by Apple stock over this period. It is worth noting that Apple is Cirrus' largest customer, accounting for 94% of the latter's revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 (which ended on Dec. 27, 2025).

Today's Change

(

1.81

%) $

2.58

Current Price

$

144.63

Cirrus supplies audio codecs, haptics, power management, and camera controller chips for smartphones. The chip company's reliance on Apple is turning out to be a catalyst for the stock. Shares of Cirrus jumped over 8% following the release of its latest quarterly results on Feb. 3.

Investors cheered the company's better-than-expected results, as Cirrus' revenue exceeded the higher end of its guidance due to "stronger-than-anticipated demand for components shipping into smartphones and a favorable mix of end devices." Cirrus' revenue increased by 4.4% year over year, while the stronger product mix led to an 18% jump in earnings to $2.97 per share.

The company is poised to end the current fiscal year with a 20% increase in earnings to $9.05 per share, exceeding the 16% average growth that S&P 500 companies are estimated to clock. What's more, Cirrus is trading at 19 times earnings right now. That's a discount to the S&P 500's average earnings multiple of 25.

What's more, Cirrus stock is significantly cheaper than Apple's as well, which trades at nearly 35 times earnings. Given that Cirrus can be considered a proxy for Apple due to its near-total reliance on the latter for its revenue, and its earnings growth was almost in line with the tech giant in the previous quarter, it is a better value play.

Apple's solid prospects should rub off positively on Cirrus stock Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities pointed out last year that Apple's iPhone shipments in the current fiscal year could land well ahead of Wall Street's estimate of 230 million units. The tech giant could end up shipping as many as 250 million iPhone units in fiscal 2026, primarily because around 315 million iPhones haven't been upgraded in the past four years.

However, the large number of users in the upgrade window suggests Apple could exceed Ives' 250 million estimate. That's probably why analysts have become bullish about Cirrus' growth prospects.

Data by YCharts.

The uptick in Cirrus' growth could lead the market to reward it with a higher earnings multiple, paving the way for more upside. That's why it would be a good idea to buy this tech stock right now.

The largest inland and offshore barge operator in the U.S. had some of its shares sold by its Vice President recently.

On Feb. 4, 2026, Ronald A. Dragg, Vice President and Controller at Kirby Corporation (KEX +2.80%), directly sold 5,429 shares in an open-market transaction valued at approximately $662,338, according to an SEC Form 4 filing.

Transaction summaryMetricValueShares sold (direct)5,429Transaction value~$662,338Post-transaction shares (direct)10,399Post-transaction value (direct ownership)~$1,263,583Transaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($122.00); post-transaction value based on Feb. 4, 2026 market close ($122.00).

Key questionsWhat proportion of Ronald Dragg's direct holdings did this transaction represent?
This sale represented 34.30% of Dragg's direct shareholdings at the time, a notably larger proportion than the 14.64% median per trade during the most recent period.Was this transaction executed as a routine open-market sale or linked to derivative activity?
The disposition stemmed from the exercise of 2,787 stock options with an immediate sale of 5,429 shares.Company overviewMetricValueMarket capitalization6.77 billionRevenue (TTM)$3.36 billionNet income (TTM)$354.57 million1-year price change17.77%Note: 1-year price change calculated using Feb. 14, 2026 as the reference date.

Company snapshotKirby Corporation is a leading U.S. provider of marine transportation and specialized distribution services, operating one of the largest fleets of tank barges and towboats in the country. It transports materials such as petrochemicals, agricultural chemicals, various industrial oils, and refined petroleum products.

What this transaction means for investorsTwo weeks ago, Kirby reported strong Q4 FY2025 earnings, exceeding earnings per share (EPS) estimates of $1.62 and posting $1.68, the best in a quarter. The company also closed out FY2025 with another strong year of results, as it has continuously throughout the years. The stock has seen five consecutive years of annual growth and is already up 12.5% this year (as of Feb. 14, 2026).

Kirby operates in an industry that may be unfamiliar to everyday consumers but is relied upon heavily in the energy and industrial sectors, as the country’s largest tech, petroleum, cargo shipping, and automobile companies rely on its transportation services to receive and send bulk inventory and waste.

It’s America’s largest operator of tank barges, which are non-operated shipping vessels that are attached to a boat that either pushes or pulls them. Barges typically remain in inland waters, and Kirby often uses the Mississippi River system to transport items.

If investors want a unique type of investment opportunity in an industry that remains essential among industrial conglomerates, then Kirby is a viable option.

Adé Hennis has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

-

NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq. and the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) are investigating the proposed sale of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (NasdaqGS: GLDD) to Saltchuk Resources, Inc. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, shareholders of Great Lakes will receive $17.00 in cash for each share of Great Lakes that they own. KSF is seeking to determine whether this consideration and the process that led to it are adequate, or whether the consideration undervalues the Company.

If you believe that this transaction undervalues the Company and/or if you would like to discuss your legal rights regarding the proposed sale, you may, without obligation or cost to you, e-mail or call KSF Managing Partner Lewis S. Kahn ([email protected]) toll free at any time at 855-768-1857, or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-gldd/ to learn more.

Please note that the transaction is structured as a tender offer, such that time may be of the essence.

To learn more about KSF, whose partners include the Former Louisiana Attorney General, visit www.ksfcounsel.com.

CONNECT WITH US: Facebook || Instagram || YouTube || TikTok || LinkedIn

More News From Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

Back to Newsroom