Arbitrum processed over 2.1 billion lifetime transactions while securing $20 billion in total value.
Aave posted $1.5B in loans with 109% growth while Fluid surged 460% across lending operations.
Stablecoin holdings exploded 82% to $8B following September Fusaka upgrade and DRIP’s 229% boost.
Robinhood deployed 500 tokenized stocks on Arbitrum, slashing trading costs to $0.03 per contract.
Arbitrum established itself as a dominant force in blockchain infrastructure during 2025, achieving over 2.1 billion lifetime transactions and securing more than $20 billion in total value.
The layer-2 network delivered explosive growth across decentralized finance protocols, stablecoin adoption, and real-world asset tokenization while expanding to over 100 active chains.
Explosive DeFi and Stablecoin Surge Powers Network Growth
Arbitrum’s decentralized finance ecosystem experienced extraordinary expansion throughout 2025, with leading protocols posting remarkable triple-digit growth rates.
Aave dominated lending activity by processing $1.5 billion in loans, representing a 109% surge from prior periods. Meanwhile, Fluid protocol outpaced competitors with an exceptional 460% growth trajectory across its lending operations.
The September Fusaka upgrade catalyzed a stablecoin explosion across the network. DRIP protocol capitalized on the performance improvements, recording an impressive 229% boost in stablecoin-related transactions following the upgrade.
Network-wide stablecoin holdings skyrocketed 82% to reach $8 billion by year-end, as reported by BLEDI on X.
From Aave’s $1.5B loans (+109%) to Fluid’s 460% growth, DeFi thrives on Arbitrum. DRIP’s 229% stablecoin boost since Sept
Fusaka upgrade + WASM performance boosts
ArbitrumDAO’s $150M warchest and 90%+ margins powering the future
Timeboost raked in $5M+ in 7 months
2025’s… pic.twitter.com/lPnQ3kEmV4
— BLEDI (@bledi_ai) December 24, 2025
ArbitrumDAO leveraged this momentum to build a formidable $150 million treasury war chest while maintaining exceptional operating margins exceeding 90%.
The Timeboost mechanism further strengthened the ecosystem’s financial position, generating over $5 million in revenue within its first seven months.
These developments demonstrated the network’s ability to scale operations while maintaining robust economic fundamentals across multiple growth vectors.
Robinhood Integration Establishes RWA Dominance
Arbitrum secured its position as the premier destination for real-world asset tokenization through Robinhood’s landmark deployment of 500 tokenized U.S. equities and ETFs.
The integration slashed trading costs to just $0.03 per contract while extending market access to 24/5 operations. This represented a fundamental shift in how traditional financial instruments could be accessed on blockchain infrastructure.
Altcoin Buzz emphasized Arbitrum’s transformation from a conventional layer-2 solution into critical backend infrastructure for global retail stock trading.
The platform now processes billions in traditional financial transactions alongside its native DeFi operations. This dual functionality positions the network as essential infrastructure for institutions seeking cost efficiencies measured in billions of dollars annually.
ARBITRUM: THE RWA HUB FOR ROBINHOOD
The transition from TradFi to On-chain just hit a massive milestone.
Robinhood has officially deployed 500 tokenized U.S. equities and ETFs on $ARB.
We’re talking 24/5 trading for legacy stocks at just $0.03 per contract.$ARB is moving… pic.twitter.com/XEHVVqt3Aj
— Altcoin Buzz (@Altcoinbuzzio) December 25, 2025
CryptoBusy highlighted the network’s 30% ecosystem GDP growth as evidence of Arbitrum’s evolution beyond niche applications.
The platform now supports diverse use cases ranging from advanced DeFi protocols to tokenized securities trading.
With transaction volumes exceeding 2.1 billion and over 100 chains operational or in development, Arbitrum demonstrated unmatched capacity for supporting institutional-grade applications at scale across multiple asset classes and financial verticals.
Volume analysis is considered a powerful tool for trading crypto, particularly on Bitcoin.
In fact, the analysis of price trends tells only part of the story, while the analysis of trading volumes reveals the strength of price movements.
For example, a potential price increase accompanied by high volumes indicates investor confidence, whereas an identical movement with low volumes might need to be considered a false signal or a trap.
Volumes
“Trading volumes” refer to the total number of BTC, or their equivalent in fiat currency, traded on an exchange or in the markets over a specific time period.
Volumes can be analyzed across different timeframes, although the most commonly used is the daily timeframe.
When analyzing Bitcoin’s price trends over a specific period, it is always advisable to also examine the trading volumes during the same timeframe.
However, besides the timeframe, there are two other variables to consider when conducting volume analysis on Bitcoin.
The first concerns the markets that are taken into consideration.
In fact, often volumetric data is available only on individual exchange platforms, or even on specific trading pairs.
For example, not only do the volumes on Binance differ from those on Coinbase, Bybit, or Bitget, but they also vary from pair to pair, such as from BTC/USD to BTC/USDT or BTC/USDC.
The second variable is the unit of measurement.
In theory, the best approach would be to use BTC itself as the unit of measurement for traded volumes, as it simplifies calculations. However, in practice, USD is predominantly used, which complicates things a bit.
First of all, it would be necessary to aggregate the trading volumes of the major exchanges to obtain a more comprehensive picture (although a volumetric analysis conducted on a large exchange can often be sufficient).
Furthermore, it would be necessary to sum the volumes of all trading pairs, including those not involving USD, which complicates matters significantly (also because USDT and USDC do not always exactly equal 1 USD).
In any case, on traditional candlestick charts, trading volume data typically appears as bars below the price and is often displayed in BTC.
Utility
Volume analysis on Bitcoin is important because it confirms trends, signals breakouts, detects divergences, and measures liquidity.
Regarding trends, it reveals their solidity. For instance, an uptrend with increasing volumes is sustainable, but one with decreasing volumes risks a reversal.
Breakouts can also be confirmed through volume analysis. For instance, a resistance level with a volume spike is certainly more reliable than one with low volumes.
Also very interesting is the analysis of divergences, for instance when the price rises while trading volumes are actually declining, because in these cases, volumetric analysis could reveal a weakness that would otherwise remain hidden.
Finally, it allows us to understand how liquidity moves, although in this case, it is not advisable to use BTC as a unit of measurement, but rather USD or other fiat currencies (USD is generally used the most).
Unfortunately, on some exchanges, fake volumes are sometimes displayed, which are not due to actual trades between users but rather to operations by the exchanges themselves aimed at making the trading volumes appear higher than they actually are.
Given that in crypto markets volumes can be manipulated, it is better to use aggregated data from reliable sources such as CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, or TradingView to analyze them.
How to Perform Volume Analysis
First, it is necessary to identify and analyze the volume bars.
Generally, these are found below the candlestick charts and are displayed in the same color as the candles: in green, if the candle has a closing price higher than the opening price, or in red if the closing is lower than the opening.
At this point, two types of interesting comparisons can be made on the volume bars.
The first step is to look for obvious anomalies, such as volume spikes (sudden peaks) or actual crashes.
In this regard, it is important to note that volume bars, like candlesticks, should only be analyzed once they are closed, not while they are still forming. For example, a volume bar from today should be analyzed only tomorrow, once it is closed, and so on.
Spikes, for example, can indicate potential volatility or reversal. Indeed, during specific events such as halving or regulatory news, volumes often surge.
The second approach is the comparison with historical averages. In this case, it is advisable to compare the volume bars with those from past periods, particularly the more recent ones. Often, for example, it is possible to add a moving average line to the volume bars, which in the case of daily candles can be set to 365 periods to display the annual average.
The Tools
One of the most recommended platforms for conducting analysis is TradingView. Not only is the basic version free, and includes many crypto markets, but it also offers numerous advanced analysis tools and integration with many real exchanges.
Alternatively, for more superficial analyses, one can use aggregators like CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap, which are particularly suitable for beginners.
Instead, to analyze on-chain trading volumes, which do not necessarily indicate buys and sells, more advanced tools such as Glassnode or Nansen can be used.
Obviously, volumetric analysis can also be conducted on the platforms of individual exchanges.
Additionally, to go beyond raw volumes, there are indicators that integrate price and volume.
One of these is the so-called On-Balance Volume (OBV), a cumulative indicator that adds volume on days with a positive close and subtracts it on negative days. In this way, a rising OBV indicates increased buying pressure, while a falling OBV indicates increased selling pressure.
There is also the so-called Volume Profile, which displays the volume traded at each price level, thus without a specific timeframe, but within an entire time range.
This is an increasingly used horizontal indicator, which helps identify high-volume areas to be considered as strong price supports or resistances, and especially the so-called Point of Control (POC), consisting of the price with the maximum volumes in the selected time frame.
Other useful indicators include the Accumulation/Distribution Line (A/D), similar to the OBV but weighted by the close, the Money Flow Index (MFI), composed of the sum of OBV and RSI, and the Chaikin Money Flow, which measures the money flow.
Advice
Volume analysis may seem trivial at first glance, but in reality, it is a powerful tool, albeit not without risks.
The main issue is the fake volumes from some exchanges that completely distort the analyses. For this reason, it is advisable to limit analyses to reliable exchanges.
The most common mistake, however, is to overemphasize the results of volume analysis. In fact, it is by no means an infallible technique, so it is absolutely necessary to combine it with price analysis.
A common piece of advice is not to limit oneself to analyzing trading volumes on exchanges, but to also extend the analysis to on-chain trading volumes, particularly to identify any significant real movements by whales.
Although volume analysis is not entirely sufficient to understand Bitcoin’s price movements, it significantly aids in grasping its real comprehension.
2025-12-25 13:3518d ago
2025-12-25 08:0019d ago
ZCash holds above $400: Can ZEC beat the market as Bitcoin demand fades?
ZCash, the token that made privacy the talk across the crypto ecosystem, was rallying once again. It was up 8.4% in 24 hours.
The bullish momentum was due to a combination of technical and ecosystem developments.
While the privacy token appeared ready for a rally towards the end of the year, Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] ETF flows were discouraging.
Demand for BTC and ETH was drying up over the past six weeks, the spot ETF flows showed. Meanwhile, ZCash saw expanded token utility, with holders getting access to yield opportunities.
The sustained defense of the $400 support zone was also a positive development over the past two weeks. AMBCrypto analyzed whether the conditions for swing traders to go long have been met.
ZCash: Bullish bias remains
Source: ZEC/USDT on TradingView
The 3-day timeframe showed a bullish swing structure. The internal structure has not flipped bearishly yet, despite the retracement to the 61.8% level at $315 toward the end of November.
The CMF showed significant capital outflows, which was a worrisome sign for buyers. The MACD also reflected weakening momentum over the past month, even though ZEC has defended the $400 psychological level.
A move above $476, the recent swing high, would signal a bullish trend continuation. In this scenario, $600 and $750 would be the next targets.
The potential for a bearish shift
The weak buying pressure and waning bullish momentum showed swing traders that a breakdown below $400 is a real threat.
A drop below $371 would be the first real warning sign that ZEC prices are likely to go to $300 and lower.
Traders’ call to action – Time to buy ZEC
Source: ZEC/USDT on TradingView
On the 4-hour timeframe, the structure was bullish once again. The $400 support has been defended.
Though the technicals were not fully bullish on this timeframe, the price action showed where long traders can look to bid.
The $450 zone was a short-term resistance, and ZEC could see another dip from this region. The imbalance at $416-$434 (white box) could be tested as a demand zone soon.
A drop below $404 would invalidate this setup. A sustained fall below $371 would signal swing traders to shift their bias bearishly.
Final Thoughts
The ZCash rally was driven by expanded token utility and also technical developments, such as the defense of the $400 level.
Swing traders could look to buy ZEC at the $416-$434 demand zone, with invalidation being the local swing low just above $400.
Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion
Akashnath S is a Senior Journalist and Technical Analysis expert at AMBCrypto. He specializes in dissecting price action, identifying key market trends through advanced chart patterns, and forecasting both short-term and long-term asset trajectories.
His distinct analytical method is grounded in his academic training as a Chemical Engineer. This background provides him with a systematic, process-oriented approach to market data, enabling him to analyze the complex dynamics of financial markets with precision and objectivity.
Having actively covered the cryptocurrency space since the landmark 2017 market cycle, Akashnath possesses years of experience navigating both bull and bear markets. This seasoned perspective is critical to his insightful reporting on market volatility and evolution.
As an active market participant, Akashnath enhances his analysis with crucial, hands-on experience. This practical application of his technical skills ensures his insights are not merely theoretical, but are also relevant and actionable for an audience looking to understand and navigate trading opportunities. He is dedicated to educating readers on the nuances of technical analysis, empowering them with the knowledge to make more informed financial decisions.
2025-12-25 13:3518d ago
2025-12-25 08:0819d ago
XRP Price Prediction: Korean Researcher Says $1,000 XRP Is Possible – Could XRP Really Go Parabolic?
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More
Ad Disclosure
Ad Disclosure
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More
Author
Alejandro Arrieche
Author
Alejandro Arrieche
Part of the Team Since
Dec 2024
About Author
Alejandro is a seasoned financial analyst and adept business expert with over seven years of experience in dissecting complex business topics and vital market trends. His insightful writing, which has...
Has Also Written
Ad Disclosure
Ad Disclosure
We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More
Last updated:
December 25, 2025
A research with an IQ of 236 laid out a bullish XRP price prediction that sees the token reaching a price of $1,000 within the next 10 years.
YoungHoon Kim, whose X account is followed by more than 388,000 users, outlined the kind of scenario that must play out for this prediction to happen.
He said that a large scale accumulation, a decline in the value of the dollar, and high inflation could boost the price of this altcoin.
Users on X argued that this would be almost impossible. The reason: Kim’s prediction would mean that XRP’s market capitalization would surpass that of gold. However, Kim emphasized that, if these pieces fall into place, “this scenario cannot be ruled out on a numerical basis”.
At the time of writing, XRP’s 2025 losses sit at 20% as bears are still in control of the market. It has been a tough year for cryptocurrencies as a whole. However, Ripple has kept making progress in growing its ecosystem.
XRP Price Prediction: This Is What Needs to Happen for XRP’s Bear Market to Be OverThe token’s daily price chart shows that a falling wedge has formed since October as XRP. Since then, it progressively declined from $3 to its current level.
This is typically a bullish price pattern, but it has not yet been confirmed. The price has entered a key area of liquidity from which it bounced in April and during the October 10 flash crash.
Source: TradingViewTo fully reverse its downtrend, XRP needs to climb above the $2.2 level. This would break the token’s bearish price structure. This could set the stage for a strong recovery to $3 at least.
Although $1,000 seems impossible in the near term, the project’s long-term prospects are promising enough to justify a bullish price prediction despite the latest downturn.
Even though top altcoins have suffered significant losses this year, a promising crypto presale called Maxi Doge ($MAXI) has defied the market’s gravity as investors continue to pour millions into this meme coin.
Maxi Doge ($MAXI) Embraces Bull Market’s Natural Energy and Turn It Into a Meme CoinBy leveraging the popularity of the Doge meme, Maxi Doge ($MAXI) plans to rally traders together by launching a token with which ‘degens’ can easily identify.
Token holders can earn rewards and bragging rights by participating in fun competitions like Maxi Gains and Maxi Ripped.
Moreover, they get exclusive access to an idea hub through which they can share their wildest and most potentially profitable YOLO trades with the community to build a collective trading “hive mind”.
As the token’s popularity increases among retail traders, the price of $MAXI could explode.
To buy $MAXI, simply head to the official Maxi Doge website and link up a compatible wallet like Best Wallet.
You can either swap USDT or ETH for this token or use a bank card instead.
Visit the Official Maxi Doge Website Here
Follow us on Google News
2025-12-25 13:3518d ago
2025-12-25 08:2019d ago
CZ Urges to Protect Users from Scam Wallets after $50M USDT Theft
Key NotesCZ proposes wallet-level blocks and UI filters to stop “poison” addresses and copy-paste traps.Case in point: an investor mis-sent ~$50M USDT to a look-alike address; funds were quickly split and obfuscated.Binance security tracks millions of poisoned addresses; phishing-style losses remain elevated across the sector.
Binance co-founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao urged crypto wallets to detect and block address-poisoning scams automatically. He proposed industry-wide blacklists and UI filtering after an investor mistakenly sent $50 million in USDT to a spoofed address last week.
In a post titled “Let’s Eradicate the Poison Scams,” Zhao said wallets should query known “poison addresses,” warn or block users, and hide zero-value spam that clutters histories. He added that Binance Wallet already performs such checks.
What’s Behind the Address Poisoning Scams
A “poison wallet,” or address poisoning scam, is a crypto trick where attackers send tiny amounts of crypto (dust) from a fake address that looks like a frequent contact’s address to your wallet, hoping you’ll copy the fake one later and send funds to them instead of the real person. It works by exploiting user habits, making you accidentally send crypto to the scammer’s address, which is just one character different from the real one, making it hard to spot.
The renewed push follows a high-profile loss on Dec. 19, when a whale copied a look-alike address from their transaction history and transferred 49,999,950 USDT to the attacker. On-chain records show funds leaving the victim’s wallet and arriving at a phishing-tagged address. Security write-ups indicate the thief quickly converted the USDT and split the proceeds across multiple wallets, with part of the haul routed through Tornado Cash to obfuscate the trail.
How to lose $50M in under an hour. This is one of the largest on-chain scam losses we’ve seen recently.
A single victim lost $50M in $USDT to an address poisoning scam. The funds had arrived less than 1h earlier.
The user first sent a small test tx to the correct address. Mins… pic.twitter.com/Umsr8oTcXC
— Web3 Antivirus (@web3_antivirus) December 19, 2025
Cointelegraph’s recap notes similar cases this year and says Binance’s security team has cataloged ~15 million poisoned addresses across networks via an in-house detection algorithm.
The $50 million incident also lands amid a broader uptick in phishing-style losses. ScamSniffer tallied $7.77M in losses across 6,344 victims in November alone, while CertiK estimates $3.3 billion in crypto losses in 2025, with phishing and wallet compromises accounting for a significant share.
The 2025 Skynet Hack3d Report is here.
$3.35B lost. 700+ incidents. New attack vectors. Key trends.
Get the most detailed breakdown of Web3 security in 2025, from exploits to insights.
Read the full report👇https://t.co/EfWupS604N
— CertiK (@CertiK) December 23, 2025
What CZ Wants Wallets to Do
Blacklist queries: Check recipients against shared, real-time lists of poisoned addresses and block or warn before users hit “send.”
Spam/dust filtering: Hide tiny “dust” transfers that poison address histories.
Prominent warnings: Default safety prompts when copying from history or when first/last characters match a known spoof pattern.
Why It Matters
Wallet-side controls are a software fix for a human-factor exploit. If widely adopted, blacklist checks and UI changes could neutralize one of crypto’s most common, high-impact scams without altering base-layer protocols.
Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.
Cybersecurity News, News
Yana Khlebnikova joined CoinSpeaker as an editor in January 2025, after previous stints at Techopedia, crypto.news, Cointelegraph, and CoinMarketCap, where she honed her expertise in cryptocurrency journalism.
Yana Khlebnikova on LinkedIn
2025-12-25 13:3518d ago
2025-12-25 08:3019d ago
Could XRP Make Trillionaires? Tech Firm Founder Thinks It's Possible
According to reports, Joshua Dalton, founder of Triblu, has put forward a striking scenario: that XRP holders could become millionaires, billionaires, or even trillionaires if the token were used as part of a US strategic crypto reserve.
Dalton argued that XRP, because of its ties to a US-based company, is a safer fit for a national reserve than Bitcoin. The claim has energized some corners of the crypto community, but it also faces steep legal and market obstacles.
Dalton’s Bold Claim And The Numbers
Dalton’s case relies on hard math. Based on reports, the US national debt is about $38 trillion. Ripple’s escrow holds roughly 34.4 billion XRP. Using those figures, Dalton and others calculate that an XRP price near $883 would be needed to offset roughly 80% of that debt.
Many people won’t like what I say below.
“Bitcoin cannot be the official currency for the United States’ reserves because Satoshi Nakamoto is still unknown and it could be the currency operated by China. The government can 💯 trust XRP because it is operated by @Ripple and 💯…
— Joshua Dalton (@J9Dalton) January 23, 2025
At present, XRP trades around $1.91. That would mean a rise of over 46,000% for the token. By comparison, Bitcoin is trading near $89,000 and would have to reach about $30 million per coin to meet a similar debt-offset goal if the plan focused on 1 million BTC, an idea once floated by US Senator Cynthia Lummis. That would be a gain of more than 33,000% from current levels.
Legal And Market Limits
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier this year creating a national Bitcoin reserve and a wider crypto stockpile framework. But policymakers appear to be focused mainly on Bitcoin for the reserve role, with other coins treated as seizure assets or general holdings.
XRPUSD currently trading at $1.85. Chart: TradingView
Importantly, Ripple’s escrow is privately controlled and governed by contracts. It cannot be commandeered by a government without legal action and likely long court fights. Even if US authorities somehow obtained large amounts of XRP, unloading such a position on global markets would likely push the price down, not up. Markets are not built to absorb trillions of dollars without heavy distortion.
Holders And Wealth Scenarios
Based on wallet data, some XRP addresses would see big nominal gains at an $880 price. For example, a holder of 10,000 XRP — currently worth about $19,100 — could see that stake climb to nearly $9 million on paper.
Reports show 179,546 wallets hold between 5,000 and 10,000 XRP. About 2,006 addresses sit between 500,000 and 1 million XRP. Yet most of the largest reserves are held by Ripple, its founders, or exchanges. Only 20 wallets contain between 500 million and 1 billion XRP, and six addresses hold more than 1 billion.
2026 is going to be epic! Locked in!
XRP will be the star of 2026.
— Coach, JV (@Coachjv_) December 23, 2025
Market Reaction And Expert Views
Matthew Sigel, lead researcher at VanEck, has argued in public that Bitcoin offers the best path to large-scale fiscal uses, and other analysts remain skeptical of any single token being used to “solve” national debt.
Coach JV and other commentators have shifted attention to 2026 as a potentially strong year for XRP price action, framing the outlook as speculative and time-bound. These views are primarily sentiment-driven and rely on factors beyond government policy, such as market demand and regulatory clarity.
Featured image from Pixabay, chart from TradingView
With Bitcoin (BTC) struggling to regain its footing at the close of 2025, more and more investors are turning their attention to some alternative options with a lower price point but a potential to skyrocket in the following weeks. In this context, Finbold has identified 4 altcoins to buy under $0.10 for start of 2026.
Midnight (NIGHT)
Midnight (NIGHT), a privacy-focused token built on the Cardano (ADA) blockchain, has been one of the most successful launches in December, reaching a market cap of $1 billion in just a week. Now, debates over cross-chain privacy and a potential stablecoin partnership fuel renewed investor interest.
Specifically, midnight developer Sebastien Guillemot has stated that the cryptographic groundwork for interoperability between Ethereum (ETH) and Cardano has been completed. This integration, he wrote on X, allows users to maintain high privacy standards no matter what wallet they are using.
Further, a native stablecoin such as Tether (USDT) on Midnight could enhance liquidity for developers and lower slippage on NIGHT trading pairs. Should everything go according to plan, NIGHT could potentially hit some new records next year.
At the time of writing, NIGHT was trading at $0.076, up nearly 18% on the weekly chart.
NIGHT weekly price. Source: CoinMarketCap
VeChain (VET)
VeChain (VET) has been rallying over the past week due to a mix of technical recovery, some new developments with the Hayabusa upgrade that introduced new staking mechanics, and broader altcoin rotation.
As a result, the price has bounced from the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level at $0.0105, a level tested three times since December 20. These signals could indicate a buying opportunity, although the 24-hour trading volume is down 22% at the time of writing, indicating cautious optimism. In other words, VET could see solid performance in January, but it will depend on whether the broader altcoin market can sustain it.
At press time, VET was changing hands at $0.015, having gained 4.5% on the week.
VET weekly price. Source: CoinMarketCap
ShibaInu (SHIB)
While Shiba Inu’s (SHIB) week has been somewhat slow, the token is seeing a modest uptick on the 24-hour chart at the time of writing, as traders have been buying the dip near key technical support levels. More importantly, open interest in SHIB derivatives is also climbing (3.42% in the past 24 hours), with more than $80 million in active futures contracts.
The increase suggests traders are positioning for short-term upside despite SHIB’s prevailing bearish macro trend. The narrative is thus primarily driven by derivatives-market optimism, which could lead to some potential gains in the coming weeks if it continues.
At publication time, SHIB was priced at $0.000007, 2.32% in the red over the past seven days.
SHIB weekly price. Source: CoinMarketCap
Pepe (PEPE)
As another well-known meme coin, Pepe (PEPE) has a reputation for high volatility. Currently, Pepe is up 3.05% over the past 24 hours, outperforming the broader cryptocurrency market’s 0.75% gain as speculative tokens rebounded across the board.
Change in leadership in the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is a key catalyst. Namely, Michael Selig, known for his pro-crypto takes, took office as CFTC chair on December 24, 2025, which traders now see as beneficial for meme coins such as PEPE.
Following the announcement, PEPE’s 24-hour trading volume rose about 18%, suggesting increased optimism in a more permissive regulatory climate. What’s more, PEPE is also showing early technical recovery signals, as its daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) has moved out of oversold territory, allowing the token to reclaim its 7-day Simple Moving Average (SMA).
If regulatory optimism continues, propped by more positive technical charts, Pepe could see some new gains next month. Right now, though, it is trading at $0.000003, 3.59% in the green this week.
PEPE weekly price. Source: CoinMarketCap
Altcoins to buy under $0.10 for start of 2026
All in all, as the crypto market enters 2026, investors looking for low-priced altcoins with upside potential may find opportunities in NIGHT, VET, SHIB, and PEPE. While crypto assets of this rank inevitably come with risks ranging from market volatility to broader macro and regulatory factors, each of them has the potential to capitalize on some of the ongoing market trends, provided investors are willing to take more extensive risk.
Featured image via Shutterstock
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:3419d ago
FNDF Over EFA: Escaping The Market-Cap Trap With Fundamental Indexing
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:3919d ago
Polaris Renewable Energy: Share Price Has Detached From The Outlook
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of PIF:CA either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
The automaker is definitely making progress on its robotaxi rollout.
At Tesla's (TSLA 0.15%) recent annual general meeting, CEO Elon Musk said the company is gearing up to start production of three new products in 2026: the Tesla Semi, a class 8 semi-trailer truck; the Optimus robot; and its dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. So it's set to be an exciting year for the company all around, but by far the most crucial development will be its robotaxi service, which will be built around the Cybercab. That business has the most significant prospects for positively impacting the stock price in the coming year.
Tesla's plans for 2026
Musk has said publicly that he believes that in the future, 80% of the company's value could come from Optimus. He has also asserted that the Tesla Semi could revolutionize the heavy-duty truck market if it achieves on a wider scale the kind of efficiency gains and cost reductions it did in the trial of the vehicle conducted by PepsiCo.
Yet as exciting as they are, Optimus and the Tesla Semi are likely to have far less dramatic near-term impacts than Tesla's robotaxi ambitions.
Today's Change
(
-0.15
%) $
-0.73
Current Price
$
484.83
Tesla's robotaxi: risk and reward
One of the market's most prominent Tesla bulls, Cathie Wood of Ark Invest, says that her firm expects that 88% of Tesla's enterprise value will derive from robotaxis in 2029, compared to just 9% from electric vehicles (EVs). That's unlikely, not least because Ark's median case expectation calls for the robotaxi service to roll out in late 2025, and Tesla has yet to operate its robotaxis commercially without safety drivers as backups. Nor has it started manufacturing Cybercabs -- the vehicles currently being used for the service are Model Y's. Still, it indicates the massive potential for a recurring stream of ride-hailing revenue to drive value for the business.
However, to get there, Tesla will need to start mass-producing Cybercabs, and also convince Tesla owners to convert their vehicles into part-time robotaxis using unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software. Tesla plans to begin Cybercab production in April and continue developing its FSD solutions. It also hopes to earn regulatory approvals for supervised FSD in Europe in 2026 – hopefully as early as February. That would help it raise consumer awareness of FSD and support a potential robotaxi deployment in the future.
Image source: Tesla.
That said, there are two potential flies in the ointment here:
Tesla's vehicles have not been approved for unsupervised FSD yet, so Tesla owners who want to earn money by allowing their vehicles to participate in the robotaxi service aren't able to do so.
Tesla's plan to aggressively ramp up Cybercab production won't make sense if it doesn't receive unsupervised robotaxi approval. Cybercabs don't have steering wheels or pedals. Hence, having a safety driver on board as a backup is not an option.
Consequently, while the potential of the robotaxi service is rising, so is the risk that Tesla will ramp up Cybercab production and capital expenditures without having the necessary regulatory approvals, or at least, enough approvals to justify the ramp.
What management said on the matter
Musk was asked about the potential for a mismatch between Cybercab production and regulatory approvals at the recent annual general meeting. He responded that "the rate at which we receive regulatory approval will roughly match the rate of Cybercab production."
He went on to say that "the regulators will have just fewer and fewer reasons to say no," based on favorable accident statistics. He also pointed to the deployment of rival Waymo's robotaxis as a development that is helping pave the way for social acceptance of autonomous vehicles.
Image source: Tesla.
Musk is right that Waymo's deployment and Tesla's robotaxi rollout in Austin are increasing the chances of wider approval for autonomous vehicles. However, what's more questionable is the assumption that the early approvals for Tesla's vehicles to operate as unsupervised robotaxis (if there are any) will cover large enough populations and areas to justify the mass production of Cybercabs starting in April.
The year of the robotaxi
As such, investors should be skeptical of the idea that Cybercabs will be a common sight on U.S. streets in the second half of 2026. That said, Tesla is making progress with its robotaxi rollout, and driverless robotaxis are already being tested (without passengers) in Austin.
Image source: Getty Images.
Moreover, while critics argue that Tesla has hardly any robotaxi safety data available, because it wasn't until recently that it had any robotaxis in service without safety drivers, the reality is that Tesla has 6.9 billion miles of data from Teslas driven with supervised FSD that indicate those systems achieve substantially better safety performance than human drivers.
All told, 2026 will be the year of Tesla's robotaxi, but don't be surprised if developments don't unfold linearly throughout the year. Tesla shareholders have good reason to be optimistic about 2026, but they will need to be patient.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:4419d ago
Four Corners Property: Better Valuation, But Limited Near‑Term Upside
SummaryFour Corners Property Trust remains rated 'hold' as valuation now reflects fair value near $23.25 per share.Portfolio concentration risk is gradually improving, but Darden exposure will likely persist above 40% for several years.Acquisition cap rates remain below FCPT’s cost of capital, leading to value-destructive growth and muted AFFO per share increases.With limited upside and macro headwinds, FCPT is expected to return close to its 9% cost of equity going forward. jetcityimage/iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Introduction In February, I wrote my first article about Four Corners Property (FCPT). At that time, the share price was around $28; now, 10 months later, the share price has fallen to around $23.50.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Robinhood has more than tripled, but a sharp drop in Bitcoin's price can temporarily halt the rally.
Robinhood (HOOD +0.17%) has been one of the top-performing fintech stocks in the market, comfortably outpacing the S&P 500 with its 222% year-to-date gain. Even with that rally, it's still down by more than 20% from its all-time high.
Some stocks go into the new year better than ever and swiftly climb to all-time highs. However, other stocks lose their shine as revenue growth decelerates and more investors question valuations.
Investors can speculate what can happen next with Robinhood stock, but these are some predictions to monitor.
Crypto transaction revenue will decelerate
Image source: Getty Images.
Crypto transactions were a big part of Robinhood's revenue this year. For instance, third-quarter revenue came to $1.27 billion, with $268 million of that coming from crypto trading. That part of Robinhood's business jumped by more than 300% year over year.
Today's Change
(
0.17
%) $
0.20
Current Price
$
120.44
It's hard for any company to maintain that type of growth rate forever, and Robinhood will be no exception to the rule. More competitors are entering crypto trading, such as SoFi (SOFI +0.99%) and Charles Schwab (SCHW +0.63%). As more companies enable crypto trading, Robinhood will face stiffer competition, which can limit future customer growth.
However, the bigger concern is the boom-and-bust nature of crypto transaction revenue. For instance, Robinhood delivered 860% year-over-year revenue growth for its crypto trading segment in Q3 2021, which was during a crypto boom. Granted, it was easier for Robinhood to deliver such a high growth rate since its crypto segment was much smaller, going from $5 million in Q3 2020 to $51 million in Q3 2021.
Then, the crypto winter came, and Bitcoin (BTC +0.24%) lost more than 70% of its value in one year. That also happened to be a miserable year for Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue, which only came in at $51 million, little changed year over year.
It wasn't that long ago when Bitcoin was up by more than 30% year to date, but the famed cryptocurrency has given up all of its gains for the year. It's now down by 7% year to date (as of Dec. 23), and that includes a 30% decline in less than three months. Investors may want to brace for lower crypto transaction revenue growth in Q4 with pessimistic Q1 forecasts unless Bitcoin stages a comeback.
Robinhood Gold will get more attention in press releases
Current Robinhood press releases focus on three income segments: transaction-based revenue, net interest revenue, and other revenue. The "other revenue" category was heavily driven by Robinhood Gold and doubled year over year.
The Robinhood Gold subscription plan gives consumers perks that let them build their portfolios faster. Interest-free margin for the first $1,000, a 3% IRA match, and high yields on idle cash are some of the perks. Robinhood increased its gold subscriber base by 77% year over year, reaching 3.9 million total subscribers in the process.
Robinhood Gold subscriptions are money makers in their own right. Gold members pay $5 per month or $50 per year for a plan. Members can make some of their money back with higher annual percentage yields (APYs) and IRA matches, but these plans offer additional benefits that translate into higher revenue growth.
First, Robinhood Gold may be enough for some people to switch from their favorite brokerage account to Robinhood. Few financial stocks compete with Robinhood Gold. The second advantage is that turning people into Robinhood Gold members can increase their transactions. Robinhood is a business, and the fintech company has only kept Robinhood Gold going because it is making big profits.
The company found that average revenue per user came to $191, which represents an 82% year-over-year increase. That figure is across regular customers and Gold members. It's feasible for Robinhood to have more than 10 million Gold members by the end of 2027, assuming it maintains current growth rates.
Investors should monitor Robinhood Gold numbers closely. It's a key catalyst that will likely have more prominence in future press releases instead of being lumped in the "other revenue" category.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 06:0019d ago
Berkshire Hathaway beyond Warren Buffett: The legacy and future
In 2026, Berkshire Hathaway will have a new leader. Greg Abel will succeed legendary investor Warren Buffett as CEO of the conglomerate in the new year.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 06:3219d ago
Forget Archer Aviation: The Smartest Investors Are Piling Into This Game-Changing Satellite Stock
These two stocks have surged over the past year, but one is a better buy for investors today.
It's been an up-and-down year for speculative growth stocks.
Flying taxi maker Archer Aviation (ACHR 0.12%) plans to launch in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as soon as next year, which would bring its electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) vehicles to paying customers for the first time. Archer Aviation stock surged, reaching over $14 per share, but has since fallen 41%.
While Archer declines, one space company continues its ascent: AST SpaceMobile (ASTS 8.89%). Up 284% year to date, AST SpaceMobile is trading higher after securing major deals with leading communications companies and making progress in launching its satellites.
If you're a growth-focused investor deciding between Archer Aviation and AST SpaceMobile, here's what you need to know.
Image source: Getty Images.
Archer Aviation has a long path to commercialization
Archer Aviation is developing innovative technology that could transform urban transportation. The company is developing eVTOL aircraft, which use electric propulsion and vertical takeoff, are quiet enough for city transportation, and maintain a low emissions profile.
This technology is exciting, but it faces significant hurdles. In the near future, Archer plans to launch commercial operations in the UAE. The company hopes to obtain the necessary certifications to begin operations there by the second half of next year.
Today's Change
(
-0.12
%) $
-0.01
Current Price
$
8.13
Then there is the issue of certification in the United States. Archer still needs to obtain type certification from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This certification is required for new aircraft designs and covers all required components and parts. This is a four-part process, and Archer is currently in the fourth and final phase of testing and analysis to ensure it meets the necessary requirements.
Once it has certification, the next step is to begin commercial operations and scale up. It's one thing to build a prototype and get it tested and certified. It's another to ramp up production so that you can operate at scale, where supply chains, quality control, and unit economics are untested.
Not only that, but Archer faces heightened competition from Joby Aviation and others, like Boeing, which is developing and working toward certification for its Wisk Aero aircraft.
Archer Aviation's flying taxis are exciting and could change transportation as we know it. But the idea remains untested at scale, and there is a question about how quickly customers will accept the technology. Right now, Archer is burning cash, and its investment thesis will take several years to play out. Unless you're a more aggressive investor with a long-term horizon (a decade or more), it may not be for you.
AST SpaceMobile has scored two huge deals
AST SpaceMobile is a satellite company that aims to enable satellite-based cellphone communication without specialized software. The company's BlueBird satellites feature large communication arrays designed to provide high-speed connectivity directly to standard, unmodified smartphones.
What makes AST compelling is the large deals it has secured with major communications companies over the past year. Last year, it secured an agreement with AT&T to use its space-based network to provide broadband coverage for standard cellphones through 2030.
It also secured a $100 million deal with Verizon Communications, including $65 million in prepayments, for service starting in 2026. AST SpaceMobile also acts as a prime contractor for the Space Development Agency (SDA) and has secured a $43 million contract for specialized government and defense applications.
The company is currently deploying its BlueBird satellites and expects to send satellites into orbit every 45 days throughout next year. The company hopes to have somewhere between 45 and 60 satellites in orbit by the end of 2026. In the long term, it envisions 90 satellites to achieve global connectivity.
Today's Change
(
-8.89
%) $
-7.62
Current Price
$
78.05
AST SpaceMobile has the edge today
Archer Aviation's eVTOL aircraft is exciting and has the potential to transform transportation. Its battery-powered aircraft could solve rush-hour gridlock. However, the concept is still in its early stages and unproven, and it may take several years to unfold.
On the flip side, AST SpaceMobile has secured several major deals, providing it with visibility into future cash flow. Not only that, but smart investors see the vast potential in the space economy. According to McKinsey and Company, the space economy will reach $1.8 trillion by 2035.
For investors looking to buy today, AST SpaceMobile is further along in its development, making it a better growth stock to scoop up right now.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:0019d ago
Spending a Day at the Disney Entertainment Studios
Emily Chang sits down with Disney Entertainment Co-Chairman Dana Walden and spends a day on the Disney lot in Burbank. They discuss AI and the company's vision for the future.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:1319d ago
SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Investigates Claims on Behalf of Investors of Klarna Group plc
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses in Klarna to Contact Him Directly to Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Klarna pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the "Registration Statement") issued in connection with Klarna's September 2025 initial public offering (the "IPO") and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - December 25, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Klarna Group plc ("Klarna" or the "Company") (NYSE: KLAR) and reminds investors of the February 20, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Defendants materially understated the risk that its loss reserves would materially go up within a few months of the IPO, which they either knew of or should have known of given the risk profile of many individuals agreeing to Klarna's buy now, pay later ("BNPL") loans; and (2); as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
On November 18, 2025, Yahoo! Finance posted an article entitled "Klarna Revenue Surges Yet Longer Loans Trigger Provisions" on its website. The article, originally published on Bloomberg, stated that Klarna "reported record revenue that beat estimates for its third quarter, while setting aside more provisions for credit losses, in its first set of earnings since going public."
The article stated that Klarna "posted a net loss of $95 million, as the firm set aside more money for potentially souring loans. The company said provisions represented 0.72% of gross merchandise volume, up from 0.44% a year ago. Provisions for loan losses came in at $235 million, above analyst estimates of $215.8 million."
On this news, Klarna stock fell 9.3% on November 18, 2025.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Klarna's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Klarna class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/KLAR or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278964
Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence?
Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AMZN either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of SFIX either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
The information contained herein is for informational purposes only. Nothing in this article should be taken as a solicitation to purchase or sell securities. Before buying or selling any stock, you should do your own research and reach your own conclusion or consult a financial advisor. Investing includes risks, including loss of principal.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted ETF (QQEW) Be on Your Investing Radar?
The First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted ETF (QQEW - Free Report) was launched on April 19, 2006, and is a passively managed exchange traded fund designed to offer broad exposure to the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market.
The fund is sponsored by First Trust Advisors. It has amassed assets over $1.91 billion, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the Large Cap Growth segment of the US equity market.
Why Large Cap GrowthCompanies that fall in the large cap category tend to have a market capitalization above $10 billion. Considered a more stable option, large cap companies boast more predictable cash flows and are less volatile than their mid and small cap counterparts.
Qualities of growth stocks include faster growth rates compared to the broader market, as well as higher valuations and higher than average sales and earnings growth rates. Something to keep in mind is the higher level of volatility that is affiliated with growth stocks. Compared to value stocks, growth stocks are a safer bet in a strong bull market, but don't perform as strongly in almost all other financial environments.
CostsCost is an important factor in selecting the right ETF, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive counterparts if all other fundamentals are the same.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.55%, putting it on par with most peer products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.4%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsEven though ETFs offer diversified exposure that minimizes single stock risk, investors should also look at the actual holdings inside the fund. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Information Technology sector -- about 39.7% of the portfolio. Consumer Discretionary and Healthcare round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) accounts for about 1.4% of total assets, followed by Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD).
The top 10 holdings account for about 12.97% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskQQEW seeks to match the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index before fees and expenses. The NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index is the equal-weighted version of the NASDAQ-100 Index which includes 100 of the largest non-financial securities listed on NASDAQ based on market capitalization.
The ETF has gained about 15.99% so far this year and it's up approximately 13.05% in the last one year (as of 12/25/2025). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $106.81 and $146.24.
The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and standard deviation of 17.61% for the trailing three-year period, making it a medium risk choice in the space. With about 102 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesFirst Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, QQEW is a good option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Growth area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and the Invesco QQQ (QQQ) track a similar index. While Vanguard Growth ETF has $204.86 billion in assets, Invesco QQQ has $412.11 billion. VUG has an expense ratio of 0.04% and QQQ charges 0.2%.
Bottom-LineRetail and institutional investors increasingly turn to passively managed ETFs because they offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; these kind of funds are also excellent vehicles for long term investors.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Is Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) a Strong ETF Right Now?
The Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB - Free Report) made its debut on 03/03/2005, and is a smart beta exchange traded fund that provides broad exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Growth category of the market.
What Are Smart Beta ETFs?Products that are based on market cap weighted indexes, which are strategies designed to reflect a specific market segment or the market as a whole, have traditionally dominated the ETF industry.
Because market cap weighted indexes provide a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way of replicating market returns, they work well for investors who believe in market efficiency.
However, some investors believe in the possibility of beating the market through exceptional stock selection, and choose a different type of fund that tracks non-cap weighted strategies: smart beta.
This kind of index follows this same mindset, as it attempts to pick stocks that have better chances of risk-return performance; non-cap weighted strategies base selection on certain fundamental characteristics, or a mix of such characteristics.
This area offers many different investment choices, such as simplest equal-weighting, fundamental weighting and volatility/momentum based weighting methodologies; however, not all of these strategies can deliver superior results.
Fund Sponsor & IndexBecause the fund has amassed over $1.45 billion, this makes it one of the average sized ETFs in the Style Box - Large Cap Growth. PWB is managed by Invesco. Before fees and expenses, this particular fund seeks to match the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index.
The Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index is designed to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure.
Cost & Other ExpensesCost is an important factor in selecting the right ETF, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins if all other fundamentals are the same.
With on par with most peer products in the space, this ETF has annual operating expenses of 0.55%.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.00%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsEven though ETFs offer diversified exposure which minimizes single stock risk, it is still important to look into a fund's holdings before investing. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
Representing 47% of the portfolio, the fund has heaviest allocation to the Information Technology sector; Industrials and Financials round out the top three.
When you look at individual holdings, Micron Technology Inc (MU) accounts for about 3.73% of the fund's total assets, followed by Palantir Technologies Inc (PLTR) and Broadcom Inc (AVGO).
Its top 10 holdings account for approximately 33.8% of PWB's total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF has added about 27.61% so far, and is up about 23.17% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). PWB has traded between $86.24 $131.31 in this past 52-week period.
The fund has a beta of 1.16 and standard deviation of 17.86% for the trailing three-year period, which makes PWB a medium risk choice in this particular space. With about 52 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk .
AlternativesInvesco Large Cap Growth ETF is an excellent option for investors seeking to outperform the Style Box - Large Cap Growth segment of the market. There are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider as well.
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) tracks CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index and the Invesco QQQ (QQQ) tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Vanguard Growth ETF has $204.86 billion in assets, Invesco QQQ has $412.11 billion. VUG has an expense ratio of 0.04% and QQQ changes 0.20%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Style Box - Large Cap Growth
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Is iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) a Strong ETF Right Now?
The iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF - Free Report) made its debut on 12/08/2015, and is a smart beta exchange traded fund that provides broad exposure to the Broad Emerging Market ETFs category of the market.
What Are Smart Beta ETFs?Products that are based on market cap weighted indexes, which are strategies designed to reflect a specific market segment or the market as a whole, have traditionally dominated the ETF industry.
Because market cap weighted indexes provide a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way of replicating market returns, they work well for investors who believe in market efficiency.
However, some investors believe in the possibility of beating the market through exceptional stock selection, and choose a different type of fund that tracks non-cap weighted strategies: smart beta.
This kind of index follows this same mindset, as it attempts to pick stocks that have better chances of risk-return performance; non-cap weighted strategies base selection on certain fundamental characteristics, or a mix of such characteristics.
The smart beta space gives investors many different choices, from equal-weighting, one of the simplest strategies, to more complicated ones like fundamental and volatility/momentum based weighting. However, not all of these methodologies have been able to deliver remarkable returns.
Fund Sponsor & IndexManaged by Blackrock, EMGF has amassed assets over $1.3 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in the Broad Emerging Market ETFs. This particular fund seeks to match the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index before fees and expenses.
The STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index (USD) composes of stocks of large and mid-capitalization companies in emerging markets that have favourable exposure to target style factors subject to constraints.
Cost & Other ExpensesCost is an important factor in selecting the right ETF, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins if all other fundamentals are the same.
Annual operating expenses for EMGF are 0.26%, which makes it one of the cheaper products in the space.
The fund has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.54%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsMost ETFs are very transparent products, and disclose their holdings on a daily basis. ETFs also offer diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk, though it's still important for investors to research a fund's holdings.
Looking at individual holdings, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing accounts for about 10.68% of total assets, followed by Tencent Holdings Ltd and Samsung Electronics Ltd.
The top 10 holdings account for about 28.6% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF return is roughly 30.28% so far, and it's up approximately 27.81% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). EMGF has traded between $41.37 $59.37 in this past 52-week period.
EMGF has a beta of 0.61 and standard deviation of 15.35% for the trailing three-year period. With about 628 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk .
AlternativesiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Broad Emerging Market ETFs segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider.
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) tracks FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index and the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF has $103.53 billion in assets, iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has $119.57 billion. VWO has an expense ratio of 0.07% and IEMG changes 0.09%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Broad Emerging Market ETFs
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) Be on Your Investing Radar?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Small Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, the Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS - Free Report) is a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on November 8, 2017.
The fund is sponsored by Invesco. It has amassed assets over $266.26 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the Small Cap Blend segment of the US equity market.
Why Small Cap BlendThere's a lot of potential to investing in small cap companies, but with market capitalization below $2 billion, that high potential comes with even higher risk.
Blend ETFs usually hold a mix of growth and value stocks as well as stocks that exhibit both value and growth characteristics.
CostsExpense ratios are an important factor in the return of an ETF and in the long term, cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive counterparts, other things remaining the same.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.39%, putting it on par with most peer products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.78%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsETFs offer a diversified exposure and thus minimize single stock risk but it is still important to delve into a fund's holdings before investing. Most ETFs are very transparent products and many disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Financials sector -- about 19% of the portfolio. Industrials and Information Technology round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Echostar Corp (SATS) accounts for about 0.76% of total assets, followed by Commscope Holding Co Inc (COMM) and Hut 8 Corp (HUT).
The top 10 holdings account for about 5.84% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskOMFS seeks to match the performance of the RUSSELL 2000 INVESCO DYNAMIC MLTIFCTR ID before fees and expenses. The Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index is constructed using a rules-based methodology by selecting equity securities from the Russell 2000 Index, which measures the performance of 2,000 small-capitalization companies in the United States.
The ETF return is roughly 15.55% so far this year and it's up approximately 13.75% in the last one year (as of 12/25/2025). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $33.88 and $46.53.
The ETF has a beta of 0.98 and standard deviation of 20.42% for the trailing three-year period. With about 1709 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesInvesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, OMFS is a reasonable option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Small Cap Blend area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) track a similar index. While iShares Russell 2000 ETF has $76.34 billion in assets, iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF has $90.22 billion. IWM has an expense ratio of 0.19% and IJR charges 0.06%.
Bottom-LineAn increasingly popular option among retail and institutional investors, passively managed ETFs offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; they are also excellent vehicles for long term investors.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Is First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF (FXU) a Strong ETF Right Now?
Making its debut on 05/08/2007, smart beta exchange traded fund First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF (FXU - Free Report) provides investors broad exposure to the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs category of the market.
What Are Smart Beta ETFs?For a long time now, the ETF industry has been flooded with products based on market capitalization weighted indexes, which are designed to represent the broader market or a particular market segment.
Market cap weighted indexes offer a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way of replicating market returns, and are a good option for investors who believe in market efficiency.
On the other hand, some investors who believe that it is possible to beat the market by superior stock selection opt to invest in another class of funds that track non-cap weighted strategies--popularly known as smart beta.
Based on specific fundamental characteristics, or a combination of such, these indexes attempt to pick stocks that have a better chance of risk-return performance.
The smart beta space gives investors many different choices, from equal-weighting, one of the simplest strategies, to more complicated ones like fundamental and volatility/momentum based weighting. However, not all of these methodologies have been able to deliver remarkable returns.
Fund Sponsor & IndexFXU is managed by First Trust Advisors, and this fund has amassed over $1.81 billion, which makes it one of the larger ETFs in the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs. Before fees and expenses, this particular fund seeks to match the performance of the StrataQuant Utilities Index.
The StrataQuant Utilities Index is a modified equal-dollar weighted index designed by the AMEX to objectively identify and select stocks from the Russell 1000 Index that may generate positive alpha relative to traditional passive style indices through the use of the AlphaDEX screening methodology.
Cost & Other ExpensesWhen considering an ETF's total return, expense ratios are an important factor. And, cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins in the long term if all other factors remain equal.
Operating expenses on an annual basis are 0.61% for FXU, making it one of the more expensive products in the space.
It's 12-month trailing dividend yield comes in at 2.29%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsEven though ETFs offer diversified exposure that minimizes single stock risk, investors should also look at the actual holdings inside the fund. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
For FXU, it has heaviest allocation in the Utilities sector --about 97.5% of the portfolio.
When you look at individual holdings, Ugi Corporation (UGI) accounts for about 4.72% of the fund's total assets, followed by Mdu Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) and Edison International (EIX).
Its top 10 holdings account for approximately 41.26% of FXU's total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF has added roughly 21.84% so far, and was up about 20.65% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). FXU has traded between $37.42 $47.55 in this past 52-week period.
The fund has a beta of 0.72 and standard deviation of 15.76% for the trailing three-year period, which makes FXU a medium risk choice in this particular space. With about 41 holdings, it has more concentrated exposure than peers .
AlternativesFirst Trust Utilities AlphaDEX ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider.
Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index and the State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Vanguard Utilities ETF has $7.8 billion in assets, State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF has $21.9 billion. VPU has an expense ratio of 0.09% and XLU changes 0.08%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) Be on Your Investing Radar?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, the SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY - Free Report) is a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on May 4, 1995.
The fund is sponsored by State Street Investment Management. It has amassed assets over $24.45 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs attempting to match the Mid Cap Blend segment of the US equity market.
Why Mid Cap BlendWith market capitalization between $2 billion and $10 billion, mid cap companies usually contain higher growth prospects than large cap companies, and are considered less risky than their small cap counterparts. Thus, companies that fall under this category provide a stable and growth-heavy investment.
Typically holding a combination of both growth and value stocks, blend ETFs also demonstrate qualities seen in value and growth investments.
CostsSince cheaper funds tend to produce better results than more expensive funds, assuming all other factors remain equal, it is important for investors to pay attention to an ETF's expense ratio.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.23%, putting it on par with most peer products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.12%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsETFs offer a diversified exposure and thus minimize single stock risk but it is still important to delve into a fund's holdings before investing. Most ETFs are very transparent products and many disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Industrials sector -- about 24% of the portfolio. Financials and Information Technology round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Comfort Systems Usa Inc. (FIX) accounts for about 1.1% of total assets, followed by Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Coherent Corp. (COHR).
The top 10 holdings account for about 7.82% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskMDY seeks to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index before fees and expenses. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is composed of 400 selected stocks listed on national stock exchanges, and spans a broad range of major industry groups.
The ETF has gained about 9.22% so far this year and is up roughly 8.07% in the last one year (as of 12/25/2025). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $468.22 and $621.24.
The ETF has a beta of 1.05 and standard deviation of 18.08% for the trailing three-year period, making it a medium risk choice in the space. With about 402 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesSPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, MDY is a good option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Mid Cap Blend area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
The Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) track a similar index. While Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF has $90.56 billion in assets, iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF has $104.25 billion. VO has an expense ratio of 0.04% and IJH charges 0.05%.
Bottom-LineWhile an excellent vehicle for long term investors, passively managed ETFs are a popular choice among institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Is Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) a Strong ETF Right Now?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Foreign Large Value ETF category of the market, the Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF - Free Report) is a smart beta exchange traded fund launched on 08/13/2013.
What Are Smart Beta ETFs?For a long time now, the ETF industry has been flooded with products based on market capitalization weighted indexes, which are designed to represent the broader market or a particular market segment.
Investors who believe in market efficiency should consider market cap indexes, as they replicate market returns in a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way.
There are some investors, though, who think it's possible to beat the market with great stock selection; this group likely invests in another class of funds known as smart beta, which track non-cap weighted strategies.
This kind of index follows this same mindset, as it attempts to pick stocks that have better chances of risk-return performance; non-cap weighted strategies base selection on certain fundamental characteristics, or a mix of such characteristics.
While this space offers a number of choices to investors, including simplest equal-weighting, fundamental weighting and volatility/momentum based weighting methodologies, not all these strategies have been able to deliver superior results.
Fund Sponsor & IndexThe fund is sponsored by Charles Schwab. It has amassed assets over $19.55 billion, making it the largest ETF in the Foreign Large Value ETF. Before fees and expenses, FNDF seeks to match the performance of the Russell RAFI Developed ex US Large Co. Index (Net).
The RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index measures the performance of large non-U.S. developed market companies based on their fundamental size and weight.
Cost & Other ExpensesCost is an important factor in selecting the right ETF, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins if all other fundamentals are the same.
Operating expenses on an annual basis are 0.25% for FNDF, making it one of the least expensive products in the space.
FNDF's 12-month trailing dividend yield is 3.44%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsMost ETFs are very transparent products, and disclose their holdings on a daily basis. ETFs also offer diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk, though it's still important for investors to research a fund's holdings.
When you look at individual holdings, Samsung Electronics Ltdaccounts for about 2.87% of the fund's total assets, followed by Shell Plc (SHEL) and Totalenergies (TTE).
Its top 10 holdings account for approximately 13.25% of FNDF's total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF has gained about 40.81% so far, and was up about 40.81% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). FNDF has traded between $32.25 $45.85 in this past 52-week period.
FNDF has a beta of 0.70 and standard deviation of 14.00% for the trailing three-year period, which makes the fund a medium risk choice in the space. With about 944 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk .
AlternativesSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Foreign Large Value ETF segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider.
iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend Index and the Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. iShares International Select Dividend ETF has $6.69 billion in assets, Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF has $14.28 billion. IDV has an expense ratio of 0.50% and VYMI changes 0.17%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Foreign Large Value ETF
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should You Invest in the First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF (FBT)?
The First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF (FBT - Free Report) was launched on June 19, 2006, and is a passively managed exchange traded fund designed to offer broad exposure to the Healthcare - Biotech segment of the equity market.
While an excellent vehicle for long term investors, passively managed ETFs are a popular choice among institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency.
Investor-friendly, sector ETFs provide many options to gain low risk and diversified exposure to a broad group of companies in particular sectors. Healthcare - Biotech is one of the 16 broad Zacks sectors within the Zacks Industry classification. It is currently ranked 4, placing it in top 25%.
Index DetailsThe fund is sponsored by First Trust Advisors. It has amassed assets over $1.39 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs attempting to match the performance of the Healthcare - Biotech segment of the equity market. FBT seeks to match the performance of the NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index before fees and expenses.
The NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index is an equal dollar weighted index designed to measure the performance of a cross section of companies in the biotechnology industry that are primarily involved in the use of biological processes to develop products or provide services.
CostsInvestors should also pay attention to an ETF's expense ratio. Lower cost products will produce better results than those with a higher cost, assuming all other metrics remain the same.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.54%, making it on par with most peer products in the space.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsWhile ETFs offer diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk, a deep look into a fund's holdings is a valuable exercise. And, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation in the Healthcare sector -- about 100% of the portfolio.
Looking at individual holdings, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) accounts for about 4.95% of total assets, followed by Natera, Inc. (NTRA) and Illumina, Inc. (ILMN).
The top 10 holdings account for about 38.84% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF has added about 29.4% so far, and is up roughly 28.61% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). FBT has traded between $145.666 and $215.09 in this past 52-week period.
The ETF has a beta of 0.66 and standard deviation of 19.35% for the trailing three-year period, making it a high risk choice in the space. With about 31 holdings, it has more concentrated exposure than peers.
AlternativesFirst Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, FBT is a good option for those seeking exposure to the Health Care ETFs area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index and the iShares Biotechnology ETF (IBB) tracks Nasdaq Biotechnology Index. State Street SPDR S&P Biotech ETF has $8.36 billion in assets, iShares Biotechnology ETF has $8.43 billion. XBI has an expense ratio of 0.35%, and IBB charges 0.44%.
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) Be on Your Investing Radar?
Launched on July 24, 2000, the iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT - Free Report) is a passively managed exchange traded fund designed to provide a broad exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment of the US equity market.
The fund is sponsored by Blackrock. It has amassed assets over $6.47 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs attempting to match the Small Cap Growth segment of the US equity market.
Why Small Cap GrowthWith more potential comes more risk, and small cap companies, with market capitalization below $2 billion, epitomizes this way of thinking.
Growth stocks have higher than average sales and earnings growth rates. While these are expected to grow faster than the broader market, they also have higher valuations. Something to keep in mind is the higher level of volatility that is affiliated with growth stocks. Even though growth stocks are more likely to outperform their value counterparts in strong bull markets, value stocks have a record of delivering better returns in almost all markets than growth stocks.
CostsSince cheaper funds tend to produce better results than more expensive funds, assuming all other factors remain equal, it is important for investors to pay attention to an ETF's expense ratio.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.18%, putting it on par with most peer products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.88%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsEven though ETFs offer diversified exposure that minimizes single stock risk, investors should also look at the actual holdings inside the fund. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Industrials sector -- about 19.1% of the portfolio. Information Technology and Healthcare round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Spx Technologies Inc (SPXC) accounts for about 1.37% of total assets, followed by Dycom Industries Inc (DY) and Interdigital Inc (IDCC).
Performance and RiskIJT seeks to match the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index before fees and expenses. The S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index measures the performance of the small-capitalization growth sector of the U.S. equity market.
The ETF return is roughly 8.5% so far this year and it's up approximately 6.6% in the last one year (as of 12/25/2025). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $108.87 and $147.60.
The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and standard deviation of 19.94% for the trailing three-year period, making it a medium risk choice in the space. With about 362 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, IJT is a good option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Small Cap Growth area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
The iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) and the Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) track a similar index. While iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF has $13.67 billion in assets, Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF has $21.23 billion. IWO has an expense ratio of 0.24% and VBK charges 0.07%.
Bottom-LineWhile an excellent vehicle for long term investors, passively managed ETFs are a popular choice among institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should You Invest in the Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT)?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Technology - Broad segment of the equity market, the Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT - Free Report) is a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on April 7, 2010.
While an excellent vehicle for long term investors, passively managed ETFs are a popular choice among institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency.
Additionally, sector ETFs offer convenient ways to gain low risk and diversified exposure to a broad group of companies in particular sectors. Technology - Broad is one of the 16 broad Zacks sectors within the Zacks Industry classification. It is currently ranked 1, placing it in top 6%.
Index DetailsThe fund is sponsored by Invesco. It has amassed assets over $329.68 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the performance of the Technology - Broad segment of the equity market. PSCT seeks to match the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Information Technology Index before fees and expenses.
The S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Information Technology Index measures the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies.
CostsInvestors should also pay attention to an ETF's expense ratio. Lower cost products will produce better results than those with a higher cost, assuming all other metrics remain the same.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.29%, making it one of the least expensive products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.02%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsEven though ETFs offer diversified exposure that minimizes single stock risk, investors should also look at the actual holdings inside the fund. Luckily, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation in the Information Technology sector -- about 100% of the portfolio.
Looking at individual holdings, Interdigital Inc (IDCC) accounts for about 4.24% of total assets, followed by Sanmina Corp (SANM) and Advanced Energy Industries Inc (AEIS).
The top 10 holdings account for about 34.04% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskYear-to-date, the Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF has gained about 22.37% so far, and is up roughly 18.52% over the last 12 months (as of 12/25/2025). PSCT has traded between $34.03 and $60.868 in this past 52-week period.
The ETF has a beta of 1.22 and standard deviation of 26.71% for the trailing three-year period, making it a high risk choice in the space. With about 72 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesInvesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Because of this, PSCT is an outstanding option for investors seeking exposure to the Technology ETFs segment of the market. There are other additional ETFs in the space that investors could consider as well.
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) tracks Technology Select Sector Index and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) tracks MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF has $94.23 billion in assets, Vanguard Information Technology ETF has $114.10 billion. XLK has an expense ratio of 0.08%, and VGT charges 0.09%.
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Should Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) Be on Your Investing Radar?
If you're interested in broad exposure to the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, look no further than the Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS - Free Report) , a passively managed exchange traded fund launched on November 24, 2015.
The fund is sponsored by Deutsche Bank Ag. It has amassed assets over $215.13 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs attempting to match the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market.
Why Large Cap BlendCompanies that find themselves in the large cap category typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion. Considered a more stable option, large cap companies boast more predictable cash flows and are less volatile than their mid and small cap counterparts.
Blend ETFs usually hold a mix of growth and value stocks as well as stocks that exhibit both value and growth characteristics.
CostsWhen considering an ETF's total return, expense ratios are an important factor, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive counterparts in the long term if all other factors remain equal.
Annual operating expenses for this ETF are 0.17%, making it one of the cheaper products in the space.
It has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.58%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsIt is important to delve into an ETF's holdings before investing despite the many upsides to these kinds of funds like diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk. And, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
This ETF has heaviest allocation to the Energy sector -- about -999900% of the portfolio. Industrials and Materials round out the top three.
Looking at individual holdings, Cardinal Health Inc (CAH) accounts for about 1.7% of total assets, followed by Amerisourcebergen Corp (ABC) and Mckesson Corp (MCK).
The top 10 holdings account for about 8.96% of total assets under management.
Performance and RiskDEUS seeks to match the performance of the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index before fees and expenses. The Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index provides exposure to domestic equities based on five factors Quality, Value, Momentum, Low Volatility and Size.
The ETF has added about 11.65% so far this year and is up roughly 10.07% in the last one year (as of 12/25/2025). In the past 52-week period, it has traded between $48.13 and $59.15.
The ETF has a beta of 0.93 and standard deviation of 13.41% for the trailing three-year period, making it a medium risk choice in the space. With about 862 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk.
AlternativesXtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), which is based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum, among other factors. Thus, DEUS is a reasonable option for those seeking exposure to the Style Box - Large Cap Blend area of the market. Investors might also want to consider some other ETF options in the space.
The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) track a similar index. While iShares Core S&P 500 ETF has $781.00 billion in assets, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has $832.01 billion. IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% and VOO charges 0.03%.
Bottom-LineRetail and institutional investors increasingly turn to passively managed ETFs because they offer low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency; these kind of funds are also excellent vehicles for long term investors.
To learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:2219d ago
Is WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth ETF (DGRS) a Strong ETF Right Now?
Designed to provide broad exposure to the Style Box - Small Cap Blend category of the market, the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth ETF (DGRS - Free Report) is a smart beta exchange traded fund launched on 07/25/2013.
What Are Smart Beta ETFs?The ETF industry has long been dominated by products based on market cap weighted indexes, a strategy created to reflect the market or a particular market segment.
Because market cap weighted indexes provide a low-cost, convenient, and transparent way of replicating market returns, they work well for investors who believe in market efficiency.
But, there are some investors who would rather invest in smart beta funds; these funds track non-cap weighted strategies, and are a strong option for those who prefer choosing great stocks in order to beat the market.
By attempting to pick stocks that have a better chance of risk-return performance, non-cap weighted indexes are based on certain fundamental characteristics, or a combination of such.
While this space offers a number of choices to investors, including simplest equal-weighting, fundamental weighting and volatility/momentum based weighting methodologies, not all these strategies have been able to deliver superior results.
Fund Sponsor & IndexThe fund is managed by Wisdomtree. DGRS has been able to amass assets over $348.08 million, making it one of the average sized ETFs in the Style Box - Small Cap Blend. This particular fund seeks to match the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index before fees and expenses.
The WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index is a fundamentally weighted index that consists of the small-capitalization segment of dividend-paying stocks with growth characteristics.
Cost & Other ExpensesCost is an important factor in selecting the right ETF, and cheaper funds can significantly outperform their more expensive cousins if all other fundamentals are the same.
Annual operating expenses for DGRS are 0.38%, which makes it on par with most peer products in the space.
It's 12-month trailing dividend yield comes in at 2.52%.
Sector Exposure and Top HoldingsWhile ETFs offer diversified exposure, which minimizes single stock risk, a deep look into a fund's holdings is a valuable exercise. And, most ETFs are very transparent products that disclose their holdings on a daily basis.
When you look at individual holdings, Us Dollaraccounts for about 77.63% of the fund's total assets, followed by Dreyfus Trsy Oblig Cash Mgmt Cl Ins and Polaris Inc (PII).
DGRS's top 10 holdings account for about 115.24% of its total assets under management.
Performance and RiskThe ETF has added about 1.19% and was up about 0.86% so far this year and in the past one year (as of 12/25/2025), respectively. DGRS has traded between $40.64 and $52.90 during this last 52-week period.
DGRS has a beta of 1.04 and standard deviation of 20.11% for the trailing three-year period, which makes the fund a medium risk choice in the space. With about 214 holdings, it effectively diversifies company-specific risk .
AlternativesWisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth ETF is a reasonable option for investors seeking to outperform the Style Box - Small Cap Blend segment of the market. However, there are other ETFs in the space which investors could consider.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index. iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF has $36.17 billion in assets, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has $101.98 billion. DGRO has an expense ratio of 0.08% and VIG changes 0.05%.
Investors looking for cheaper and lower-risk options should consider traditional market cap weighted ETFs that aim to match the returns of the Style Box - Small Cap Blend
Bottom LineTo learn more about this product and other ETFs, screen for products that match your investment objectives and read articles on latest developments in the ETF investing universe, please visit Zacks ETF Center.
2025-12-25 12:3518d ago
2025-12-25 07:3019d ago
Beaten Down, Not Broken: Otis Worldwide Is A Forgotten Gem With Upside Potential
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of OTIS either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 04:5719d ago
NEAR Price Prediction: Testing $1.60 Resistance with $1.70 Target by January 2026
NEAR Protocol shows mixed signals at $1.47, but bullish MACD momentum and analyst targets of $1.53-$1.70 suggest upside potential if $1.60 resistance breaks.
NEAR Price Prediction Summary
• NEAR short-term target (1 week): $1.53 (+4.1%)
• NEAR Protocol medium-term forecast (1 month): $1.60-$1.70 range (+8.8% to +15.6%)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $1.60
• Critical support if bearish: $1.41
Recent NEAR Protocol Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest NEAR price prediction consensus from Blockchain.News points to a cautiously optimistic outlook for NEAR Protocol. Analysts have identified two key targets: a short-term NEAR price prediction of $1.53 and a medium-term NEAR Protocol forecast targeting $1.70. Both predictions hinge on NEAR's ability to break through the critical $1.60 resistance level.
The market consensus reveals moderate confidence in NEAR's recovery potential, with analysts noting mixed technical signals but emerging bullish momentum. This NEAR price prediction aligns with current technical indicators showing early signs of reversal from oversold conditions.
NEAR Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Breakout
NEAR Protocol technical analysis reveals a cryptocurrency at a critical juncture. Trading at $1.47, NEAR sits below key moving averages including the SMA 7 ($1.50) and SMA 20 ($1.59), indicating recent weakness. However, several technical factors support a more optimistic NEAR Protocol forecast.
The RSI at 35.81 places NEAR in neutral territory, suggesting the token isn't oversold and has room for upward movement. More encouraging is the MACD histogram reading of 0.0080, which signals emerging bullish momentum despite the negative MACD line. The Stochastic indicators (%K: 19.37, %D: 16.99) suggest NEAR is approaching oversold levels, typically indicating a potential bounce.
NEAR's position within the Bollinger Bands (%B: 0.2225) shows the price trading in the lower portion of the band, with room to move toward the middle band at $1.59. The daily ATR of $0.12 indicates moderate volatility, providing opportunities for traders while maintaining manageable risk levels.
NEAR Protocol Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for NEAR
In the bullish scenario, NEAR price target progression follows a clear technical path. The immediate objective is breaking the $1.60 resistance, which coincides with the SMA 20 level. Successfully clearing this hurdle opens the door to the $1.70 NEAR Protocol forecast target, representing a 15.6% gain from current levels.
The bullish case strengthens if NEAR can maintain above the EMA 12 ($1.53) and generate increasing volume on any breakout attempt. The MACD histogram's positive reading supports this scenario, suggesting momentum is building despite the current consolidation phase.
Bearish Risk for NEAR Protocol
The bearish scenario for this NEAR price prediction centers on failure to hold the $1.47 pivot point. If NEAR breaks below this level, the immediate support at $1.41 becomes critical. A breakdown below $1.41 could trigger a retest of the 52-week low at $1.43, creating a challenging technical environment.
Risk factors include the distance from higher moving averages (SMA 50 at $1.93, SMA 200 at $2.37) and NEAR's position 56.24% below its 52-week high, indicating the broader trend remains challenging.
Should You Buy NEAR Now? Entry Strategy
For those considering whether to buy or sell NEAR, the current technical setup suggests a cautious accumulation approach. Entry points should focus on the $1.44-$1.47 range, with a stop-loss below $1.41 to manage downside risk.
A more aggressive entry strategy involves waiting for a break above $1.53 (EMA 12) with confirmation volume, targeting the $1.60 resistance. This approach offers better risk-reward dynamics but requires patience for the setup to develop.
Position sizing should remain conservative given the mixed technical signals. Consider scaling into positions rather than full allocation, allowing for additional purchases if the NEAR Protocol forecast plays out favorably.
NEAR Price Prediction Conclusion
This NEAR price prediction maintains medium confidence in upside potential over the coming weeks. The combination of oversold conditions, emerging MACD momentum, and analyst targets in the $1.53-$1.70 range supports a cautiously optimistic outlook.
Key indicators to monitor for confirmation include volume expansion on any move above $1.53, RSI breaking above 40 to confirm momentum shift, and sustained trading above the EMA 12. Invalidation signals include breaks below $1.41 support or failure to reclaim $1.50 within the next week.
The timeline for this NEAR Protocol forecast extends through January 2026, with initial targets expected within 1-2 weeks if technical conditions align. Traders should remain flexible and adjust positions based on developing price action around these critical levels.
APT price prediction shows potential bounce to $1.75 target amid oversold conditions, though bearish consensus warns of $1.24 downside risk in coming weeks.
APT Price Prediction Summary
• APT short-term target (1 week): $1.75 (+6.7%) - oversold bounce scenario
• Aptos medium-term forecast (1 month): $1.24-$1.65 range with bearish bias
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $1.92 (immediate resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $1.42 (strong support confluence)
Recent Aptos Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest APT price prediction data reveals a predominantly bearish consensus among cryptocurrency analysts. CoinCodex maintains the most aggressive downside target at $1.24, representing a potential 23% decline from current levels. This prediction aligns with the extreme fear sentiment reflected in the Fear & Greed Index reading of 24.
However, our Aptos forecast differs slightly from the bearish crowd. While Blockchain.News projects a $1.44 target citing bearish momentum, their earlier analysis from December 22nd highlighted oversold conditions with an RSI of 28.97 and bullish MACD histogram signals. Hexn.io's more neutral stance with a $1.65 target appears most aligned with current technical realities.
The divergence in these predictions creates an interesting contrarian opportunity, particularly given that market sentiment often marks temporary bottoms when reaching extreme fear levels.
APT Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Oversold Bounce
Current Aptos technical analysis reveals a compelling setup for a potential short-term recovery despite the prevailing bearish sentiment. With APT trading at $1.64, the token sits just above the middle Bollinger Band at $1.65, indicating relative stability within the recent volatility range.
The RSI reading of 39.71 places Aptos in neutral territory but approaching oversold conditions. More importantly, the MACD histogram has turned positive at 0.0452, suggesting early bullish momentum divergence. This technical pattern often precedes short-term bounces, especially when combined with the current Stochastic %K reading of 69.16, which indicates the token may be emerging from oversold territory.
Volume analysis from Binance spot trading shows $11.9 million in 24-hour volume, which remains relatively healthy for validating any potential breakout moves. The Average True Range (ATR) of $0.14 suggests that a move to the $1.75-$1.78 range remains well within normal volatility parameters.
Aptos Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for APT
The most probable bullish scenario for our APT price prediction centers around a recovery to the $1.75 level within the next 7-10 days. This APT price target represents the convergence of several technical factors: the 26-period EMA at $1.79, previous support-turned-resistance, and the psychologically important level that analysts at Blockchain.News identified in their December 22nd oversold bounce analysis.
For this bullish case to materialize, APT needs to maintain support above $1.55 (the recent 24-hour low) and break through the immediate resistance at $1.69. A sustained move above $1.75 could open the door to testing the upper Bollinger Band at $1.85, though this scenario carries lower probability given the current market structure.
Bearish Risk for Aptos
The bearish scenario aligns with the consensus APT price prediction of $1.24, which represents a breakdown below the critical $1.42 support level. This downside target gains credibility from the significant gap between current price and longer-term moving averages - APT trades 25% below the 50-day SMA and 57% below the 200-day SMA.
A break below $1.42 would likely trigger algorithmic selling and potentially drive APT toward the 52-week low of $1.45. The bearish case strengthens if Bitcoin and broader crypto markets continue their current weakness, as APT has shown high correlation with overall market sentiment.
Should You Buy APT Now? Entry Strategy
Based on our Aptos technical analysis, the current risk-reward setup suggests a cautious but potentially profitable entry strategy. For those considering whether to buy or sell APT, the optimal approach involves scaled entry points rather than a single large position.
Primary entry zone: $1.55-$1.60 (near current support)
Secondary entry: $1.42-$1.45 (if bearish scenario unfolds)
Stop-loss level: $1.35 (below major support confluence)
Initial profit target: $1.75 (risk-reward ratio of approximately 2:1)
Position sizing should remain conservative given the mixed signals. Allocating no more than 2-3% of portfolio value allows for proper risk management while capitalizing on the potential oversold bounce that technical indicators suggest.
APT Price Prediction Conclusion
Our comprehensive Aptos forecast indicates a medium confidence prediction for APT to test $1.75 within the next two weeks, despite the prevailing bearish sentiment among analysts. The combination of oversold technical conditions, positive MACD histogram momentum, and extreme fear sentiment creates conditions that historically favor short-term bounces.
However, the broader trend remains bearish, and any rally should be viewed as a counter-trend movement rather than a reversal. Key indicators to monitor for prediction validation include RSI breaking above 45, sustained MACD line crossing above the signal line, and most importantly, APT reclaiming the $1.69 resistance level on substantial volume.
The timeline for this APT price prediction extends through early January 2026, with the critical test occurring within the next 5-7 trading days. Failure to hold current support levels would invalidate the bullish scenario and likely trigger the more pessimistic $1.24 target that dominates current analyst predictions.
Image source: Shutterstock
apt price analysis
apt price prediction
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:0919d ago
ARB Price Prediction: Targeting $0.24 Recovery as Technical Momentum Builds for Q1 2026
ARB shows bullish MACD momentum from $0.19 support, with analysts targeting $0.23-$0.40 recovery over next 4-6 weeks as Arbitrum breaks key resistance levels.
Arbitrum (ARB) is showing early signs of technical recovery after finding solid support at $0.18-$0.19 levels. With the MACD histogram turning bullish and analyst consensus pointing toward upside targets, our ARB price prediction suggests a measured recovery is underway for the Layer 2 scaling solution.
ARB Price Prediction Summary
• ARB short-term target (1 week): $0.23 (+21% from current $0.19)
• Arbitrum medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.24-$0.28 range
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.23 immediate resistance
• Critical support if bearish: $0.17 Bollinger Band lower boundary
Recent Arbitrum Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest Arbitrum forecast from multiple analysts shows remarkable convergence around the $0.23-$0.24 price target. BanklessTimes presents the most bullish ARB price prediction with a $0.40 medium-term target, citing network activity expansion as a key driver. Meanwhile, Blockchain.News maintains a more conservative stance with $0.23-$0.24 short-term targets based on technical momentum.
The analyst consensus reveals medium confidence across all predictions, with ICO Bench identifying a potential accumulation phase that could support higher prices. This unified bullish sentiment, combined with the current technical setup, strengthens the case for ARB's near-term recovery potential.
ARB Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Bullish Momentum
The current Arbitrum technical analysis reveals several encouraging signals supporting our ARB price prediction. The MACD histogram has turned positive at 0.0008, marking the first bullish momentum shift after extended downside pressure. This momentum indicator, combined with ARB trading above the critical $0.19 pivot point, suggests the selling pressure may be exhausting.
Volume analysis shows $8.29 million in 24-hour Binance spot trading, indicating steady market participation without excessive volatility. The daily ATR of $0.01 reflects controlled price movements, which typically precede more significant directional moves. ARB's current position at 0.27 within the Bollinger Bands suggests room for upward expansion before hitting overbought conditions.
The RSI reading of 40.88 remains in neutral territory, providing ample space for bullish momentum to develop without immediate overbought concerns. This technical foundation supports the Arbitrum forecast for gradual price appreciation rather than explosive moves.
Arbitrum Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for ARB
Our primary ARB price target of $0.24 represents a 26% gain from current levels and aligns with recent analyst predictions. Breaking above the immediate resistance at $0.23 would likely trigger algorithmic buying and push ARB toward the Bollinger Band upper boundary at $0.22, with extension potential to $0.24.
The bullish Arbitrum forecast extends to $0.28-$0.31 if ARB can sustain momentum above $0.24. This scenario requires confirmation from increasing volume and RSI pushing above 60. The network's fundamental strength in Layer 2 scaling could provide the narrative support needed for such appreciation.
Bearish Risk for Arbitrum
The primary risk to our ARB price prediction lies in a break below the $0.17 support level, which coincides with both the Bollinger Band lower boundary and the 52-week low region. Such a breakdown could trigger stop-loss selling and push ARB toward $0.15-$0.16.
A bearish scenario would likely unfold if broader crypto markets face renewed selling pressure or if Arbitrum-specific negative developments emerge. Traders should monitor the $0.19 pivot point closely, as sustained trading below this level would invalidate the bullish technical setup.
Should You Buy ARB Now? Entry Strategy
Based on our Arbitrum technical analysis, the current $0.19 level presents a reasonable entry opportunity for those asking "buy or sell ARB." The risk-reward ratio favors buyers, with clear upside targets at $0.23-$0.24 against downside risk to $0.17.
Conservative traders should consider dollar-cost averaging between $0.18-$0.20, with initial position sizing at 25-30% of intended allocation. More aggressive traders could enter immediately at $0.19 with a stop-loss at $0.175, targeting the $0.24 ARB price target for a 2:1 risk-reward ratio.
Risk management remains crucial given ARB's 69% distance from 52-week highs. Position sizing should reflect this elevated risk, with stops placed below the $0.17 support to protect against deeper corrections.
ARB Price Prediction Conclusion
Our ARB price prediction anticipates a measured recovery to $0.24 over the next 4-6 weeks, supported by improving technical momentum and analyst consensus. The bullish MACD histogram and solid support at $0.19 provide the foundation for this Arbitrum forecast, though confidence remains medium given broader market uncertainties.
Key indicators to watch include sustained trading above $0.19, increasing volume on any upward moves, and RSI progression toward 50-60 levels. A break above $0.23 would validate the bullish scenario and open the path to higher targets. Conversely, failure to hold $0.17 would signal a return to bearish conditions and require reassessment of the prediction framework.
The timeline for this ARB price prediction extends through January 2026, with initial confirmation expected by early January if technical momentum continues building.
Image source: Shutterstock
arb price analysis
arb price prediction
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:1519d ago
OP Price Prediction: Critical Support Test Could Trigger 35% Rally to $0.35 by January 2026
OP price prediction targets $0.35 within 4-6 weeks if critical $0.26 support holds, but breakdown risks 15% decline to $0.22 range.
Optimism (OP) finds itself at a pivotal technical juncture as we close out 2025, with the token trading precisely at critical support levels that will determine its near-term trajectory. Our comprehensive OP price prediction analysis reveals a coin teetering between significant upside potential and immediate downside risk.
OP Price Prediction Summary
• OP short-term target (1 week): $0.24 (-8%) if support breaks, $0.28 (+8%) if it holds
• Optimism medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.35-$0.37 range (+35-42% upside potential)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.30 (EMA 26 resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $0.26 current pivot point, then $0.22
Recent Optimism Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest analyst consensus reveals a cautious but ultimately optimistic Optimism forecast for the coming weeks. Blockchain.News projects an immediate OP price target of $0.22-$0.24 in the short term, citing bearish momentum with RSI at 39.13. Meanwhile, StockInvest.us presents a more bullish medium-term outlook, suggesting OP could reach $0.35-$0.37 within 4-6 weeks, representing a potential 30-37% upside.
The convergence of these predictions around the $0.24 support level creates a compelling risk-reward scenario. All analysts agree that OP must first navigate through immediate downside pressure before any meaningful recovery can begin. This creates a clear framework for our OP price prediction strategy.
OP Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Reversal
The current Optimism technical analysis paints a picture of oversold conditions approaching a critical decision point. With OP trading at $0.26, the token sits directly on its immediate support level and within 0.15 position of the lower Bollinger Band at $0.25.
The RSI reading of 34.61 indicates neutral territory with room for further decline, while the Stochastic oscillator at 6.87/%K suggests severely oversold conditions. The MACD histogram remains negative at -0.0005, confirming ongoing bearish momentum, but the shallow reading suggests this selling pressure may be waning.
Most tellingly, OP has retraced 71.45% from its 52-week high of $0.91, placing it in deep value territory. The clustering of all moving averages above the current price ($0.27 SMA7, $0.29 SMA20, $0.33 SMA50) creates multiple resistance layers that must be overcome for any sustained rally.
Volume analysis shows $4.56 million in 24-hour Binance spot trading, which remains relatively modest and suggests the current consolidation lacks conviction in either direction.
Optimism Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for OP
If the $0.26 support level holds firm, our OP price prediction targets an initial bounce to the $0.28-$0.30 resistance zone, corresponding to the EMA 12 and EMA 26 levels. A break above $0.30 would signal the end of the current downtrend and open the path toward the $0.35-$0.37 OP price target that analysts are forecasting for the medium term.
The bullish scenario requires OP to reclaim the $0.29 SMA20 level, which would shift the short-term moving average structure from bearish to neutral. From there, a sustained move above $0.33 (SMA50) would confirm a trend reversal and target the $0.45 strong resistance level over the longer term.
Bearish Risk for Optimism
The bearish case centers on a breakdown below the current $0.26 pivot point, which would likely trigger algorithmic selling and target the $0.22-$0.24 range that multiple analysts have identified. This represents a 15-23% decline from current levels and would establish new multi-month lows for OP.
A break below $0.22 would signal a continuation of the broader downtrend and could target the $0.20 psychological support level. The risk factors to monitor include broader cryptocurrency market weakness, reduced Layer 2 adoption metrics, and any negative developments in the Ethereum scaling narrative.
Should You Buy OP Now? Entry Strategy
Based on our Optimism technical analysis, the current setup presents a compelling risk-reward opportunity for tactical traders. The optimal buy or sell OP strategy involves waiting for confirmation at these critical levels rather than attempting to catch a falling knife.
Conservative buyers should wait for a confirmed bounce above $0.28 before establishing positions, with initial targets at $0.30-$0.32. More aggressive traders could consider scaling into positions at current levels ($0.26) with tight stop-losses at $0.24.
Risk management is crucial given the uncertain technical picture. Position sizes should be limited to 1-2% of portfolio allocation, with stop-losses strictly maintained at $0.24 (7.5% risk) for long positions. Take-profit levels should be set at $0.30 (15% gain) for the first target and $0.35 (35% gain) for the extended target.
OP Price Prediction Conclusion
Our comprehensive analysis suggests OP is approaching a critical inflection point that will determine its trajectory into 2026. The convergence of technical support at $0.26, oversold oscillator readings, and analyst price targets around $0.35 creates a medium-confidence bullish setup over the 4-6 week timeframe.
The key indicators to watch for confirmation include RSI breaking above 40 for momentum recovery, MACD histogram turning positive, and most critically, price action above the $0.28 EMA12 level. Invalidation of this Optimism forecast would occur on a sustained break below $0.24.
Given the current risk-reward profile, we assign a MEDIUM confidence level to our OP price prediction of $0.35 within the next month, contingent on holding current support levels. The timeline for this prediction to play out extends through January 2026, with initial confirmation or rejection expected within the next 5-7 trading days.
Image source: Shutterstock
op price analysis
op price prediction
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:2219d ago
SUI Price Prediction: Recovery to $1.70-$2.10 Range Expected by January 2025
SUI price prediction points to potential 21-50% upside to $1.70-$2.10 range within 4-6 weeks, supported by bullish MACD divergence and oversold conditions near $1.40 pivot.
SUI Price Prediction Summary
• SUI short-term target (1 week): $1.50-$1.55 (+7-11% from current $1.40)
• Sui medium-term forecast (1 month): $1.70-$2.10 range (+21-50% upside potential)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $1.50 resistance turning to support
• Critical support if bearish: $1.33-$1.30 zone (immediate and strong support levels)
Recent Sui Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest SUI price prediction consensus from major crypto analysts shows a cautiously optimistic outlook despite recent consolidation. MEXC News and Blockchain.News both align on a $1.70-$2.10 medium-term target, citing bullish MACD divergence and oversold conditions as primary catalysts for recovery.
However, CoinCodex presents a contrarian view with a bearish SUI price target of $1.12, noting that 85% of technical indicators currently signal downtrend momentum. This divergence in analyst opinions creates an interesting setup where the market appears to be at a critical decision point.
The Sui forecast from multiple sources suggests that breaking above the $1.50 resistance level could validate the bullish scenario, while failure to hold current support zones could trigger the bearish alternative toward $1.12.
SUI Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Reversal
Current Sui technical analysis reveals several compelling factors supporting a potential price recovery. The RSI reading of 39.72 indicates neutral conditions with room for upward movement, while the MACD histogram showing 0.0016 suggests early bullish momentum is building.
The Bollinger Bands analysis is particularly revealing, with SUI trading at a %B position of 0.17, placing it very close to the lower band at $1.34. This positioning often indicates oversold conditions and potential for mean reversion toward the middle band at $1.51.
Volume analysis shows healthy trading activity at $28.6 million on Binance, providing sufficient liquidity for any potential breakout moves. The Daily ATR of $0.11 indicates moderate volatility, suggesting moves of 7-8% in either direction are entirely feasible within short timeframes.
Sui Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for SUI
The primary SUI price prediction for the bullish scenario targets the $1.70-$2.10 range within 4-6 weeks. This forecast is supported by several technical factors:
First, SUI needs to reclaim the $1.50 level, which represents both the 20-day SMA and immediate resistance. A decisive break above this level would likely trigger momentum toward $1.73 (immediate resistance) and subsequently the $2.10 upper target.
The bullish MACD histogram, combined with the oversold Bollinger Bands position, creates a favorable risk-reward setup. If buying pressure emerges, the path to $1.70 appears relatively clear, representing a 21% upside from current levels.
Bearish Risk for Sui
The bearish Sui forecast cannot be ignored, particularly given CoinCodex's warning about 85% of indicators showing downtrend signals. If SUI fails to hold the $1.33 immediate support, a decline toward the $1.30 strong support becomes probable.
A break below $1.30 would likely trigger stop-losses and accelerate selling pressure toward the $1.12 target mentioned by CoinCodex. This scenario would represent a 20% decline from current levels and would invalidate the near-term recovery thesis.
Should You Buy SUI Now? Entry Strategy
Based on current Sui technical analysis, a layered entry approach appears most prudent. The first entry zone is at current levels around $1.40, representing the established pivot point with a tight stop-loss at $1.32.
A more conservative entry would wait for a break above $1.50 with volume confirmation before establishing positions. This approach reduces risk but sacrifices some potential upside if the recovery begins immediately.
For risk management, any SUI price prediction strategy should include stop-losses below $1.30 to limit downside exposure. Position sizing should reflect the medium confidence level of current forecasts, with allocation not exceeding 2-3% of total portfolio risk.
SUI Price Prediction Conclusion
The SUI price prediction for the coming weeks favors a recovery scenario with medium confidence. The technical setup supports a move toward $1.70-$2.10 within 4-6 weeks, representing 21-50% upside potential from current $1.40 levels.
Key indicators to watch include MACD signal line crosses, RSI moving above 50, and most critically, SUI's ability to reclaim and hold the $1.50 resistance level. The Sui forecast timeline suggests this setup should resolve within the next 7-10 days.
Regarding buy or sell SUI decisions, the current risk-reward favors cautious accumulation near support levels, but traders should remain prepared for either scenario. The technical analysis supports a bullish bias, but the mixed analyst consensus requires careful position management and adherence to predefined stop-loss levels.
WLD price prediction points to potential $0.67 target if $0.47 support holds, while bearish scenario suggests $0.394 downside risk based on technical analysis.
Worldcoin (WLD) finds itself at a critical juncture as Christmas 2025 approaches, with the token trading at $0.49 and facing a pivotal test of support levels. Our comprehensive Worldcoin forecast suggests the next two weeks will determine whether WLD can mount a meaningful recovery or face further downside pressure.
WLD Price Prediction Summary
• WLD short-term target (1 week): $0.55-$0.58 (+12-18%)
• Worldcoin medium-term forecast (1 month): $0.394-$0.67 range
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $0.65 resistance
• Critical support if bearish: $0.47 (immediate) / $0.394 (extended)
Recent Worldcoin Price Predictions from Analysts
The analyst community presents a notably divided outlook on WLD's near-term prospects. MEXC News maintains a WLD price target of $0.67 for the medium term, contingent on the token successfully defending the crucial $0.47 support level. This optimistic Worldcoin forecast aligns with Blockchain.News projections suggesting a potential move to $0.67 resistance within two weeks.
However, contrarian voices emerge from WEEX Crypto News, presenting a more cautious WLD price prediction of $0.394413 in the short term. Their analysis points to 79% of indicators signaling decline, coupled with 'Extreme Fear' readings in market sentiment indicators. This bearish perspective creates an interesting dynamic where the consensus ranges from significant downside risk to modest recovery potential.
The divergence in analyst views reflects the current technical uncertainty surrounding Worldcoin, with the $0.47 support level serving as the critical battleground between bulls and bears.
WLD Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Potential Reversal
Current Worldcoin technical analysis reveals a token positioned precariously between hope and despair. Trading at $0.49, WLD sits just above the critical $0.47 support that has become the focal point for our price prediction framework.
The moving average structure tells a story of sustained bearish pressure. With WLD trading below all major moving averages - SMA 7 at $0.51, SMA 20 at $0.55, and significantly below the SMA 200 at $0.96 - the longer-term trend remains decidedly negative. This positioning supports more conservative WLD price prediction scenarios.
However, momentum indicators present a more nuanced picture. The RSI reading of 35.66 suggests WLD is approaching oversold territory without quite reaching it, providing room for potential bounce scenarios. More encouragingly, the MACD histogram shows a marginally positive reading of 0.0001, indicating the first signs of bullish momentum building beneath the surface.
The Bollinger Bands analysis reveals WLD trading in the lower portion of the range at 0.2251, suggesting the token is testing lower bounds but hasn't broken into extreme oversold territory. This positioning often precedes either a bounce back toward the middle band at $0.55 or a breakdown below the lower band at $0.45.
Volume analysis shows moderate activity at $6.23 million on Binance spot, which while not explosive, provides sufficient liquidity for meaningful price movements in either direction.
Worldcoin Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for WLD
Our optimistic Worldcoin forecast centers on the successful defense of $0.47 support, which would trigger initial upside targeting the SMA 7 at $0.51. Breaking this level with conviction opens the door to our primary WLD price target of $0.55, representing the SMA 20 and middle Bollinger Band.
The ultimate bullish objective remains the $0.67 level identified by multiple analyst predictions. This target aligns with the upper Bollinger Band region and represents a 37% gain from current levels. For this scenario to materialize, WLD would need to see:
Bearish Risk for Worldcoin
The bearish scenario for our WLD price prediction centers on a break below the $0.47 support zone. Such a breakdown would likely trigger algorithmic selling and stop-loss orders, potentially driving WLD toward the $0.394 level suggested by WEEX Crypto News.
Extended weakness could see Worldcoin testing the 52-week low region around $0.48, with a breakdown below this level opening the door to the more pessimistic target of $0.30 mentioned in recent analyst coverage. Key bearish catalysts include:
Volume-confirmed break below $0.47
RSI breakdown below 30 into oversold territory
MACD divergence turning more negative
Broader cryptocurrency market weakness
Should You Buy or Sell WLD Now? Entry Strategy
Based on our Worldcoin technical analysis, the current risk-reward profile suggests a cautious approach with specific entry criteria. For those considering whether to buy or sell WLD, we recommend the following strategy:
Buy signals: Entry above $0.51 with stop-loss at $0.46 targets the $0.55-$0.58 range for a favorable 2:1 risk-reward ratio. This approach capitalizes on our short-term WLD price prediction while maintaining strict risk management.
Sell signals: Consider reducing exposure on any bounce to the $0.55-$0.58 resistance zone, particularly if accompanied by weak volume or RSI divergence.
Position sizing should remain conservative given the mixed technical picture and competing analyst forecasts. Risk no more than 2-3% of portfolio value on any single WLD trade until clearer directional bias emerges.
WLD Price Prediction Conclusion
Our comprehensive analysis suggests a medium confidence WLD price prediction targeting the $0.55-$0.67 range over the next 2-4 weeks, contingent on successful defense of $0.47 support. The Worldcoin forecast remains cautiously optimistic in the near term, with the potential for a 12-37% upside move if technical conditions align.
However, traders should remain vigilant for breakdown scenarios that could quickly shift the narrative toward the bearish $0.394 target. The key indicators to monitor for confirmation include volume expansion above $0.51, RSI recovery above 40, and sustained MACD positive divergence.
The timeline for this prediction centers on the next 10-14 trading days, during which WLD should either establish a clear recovery pattern or break down toward lower support levels. As always with cryptocurrency predictions, maintain appropriate position sizing and risk management protocols.
Image source: Shutterstock
wld price analysis
wld price prediction
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:3819d ago
Yuan Soars, Bitcoin Stalls: Why the Dollar Dip Isn't Lifting Crypto
Yuan hits 2.5-year high as Chinese exporters sell dollars — over $1 trillion offshore may flow back home.Gold hits records and dollar weakens, but Bitcoin can't break $90,000 — the classic bullish setup isn't working.Year-end liquidity crunch and $825 million in ETF outflows suppress Bitcoin — Fed easing in 2026 may help.China’s currency hits a 2.5-year high as the dollar weakens — a classic bullish setup for Bitcoin that isn’t working.
China’s onshore yuan closed at its strongest level since May 2023 on Thursday, trading at 7.0066 per dollar and nearly breaching the psychologically key 7-per-dollar mark. The move caps a 5% appreciation against the greenback since early April.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Yuan’s Rally, Dollar’s ExitThe rally is being driven by Chinese exporters rushing to convert their dollar revenues into yuan before year-end. This is more than seasonal housekeeping — analysts estimate that over $1 trillion in corporate dollars held offshore could eventually flow back to China.
Why now? The calculus has shifted. China’s economy is showing signs of recovery, the US Federal Reserve has been cutting rates, and the yuan itself is strengthening — creating a self-reinforcing cycle. Holding dollars looks less attractive when the currency you’re converting into keeps rising.
Some brokerages believe this is only the beginning. The headwinds that pressured the yuan for years — trade tensions, capital flight, a surging dollar — are now reversing into tailwinds. If the Fed eases more aggressively in 2026, as some expect, the yuan’s climb could accelerate further.
The Setup That Should WorkA weakening dollar typically lifts Bitcoin. The logic is straightforward: as the world’s reserve currency loses ground, dollar-denominated assets like BTC become relatively cheaper, and the “digital gold” narrative gains traction.
Gold is playing its part — the metal has hit record highs this month. Yet Bitcoin remains stuck in a $85,000-$90,000 range, unable to sustain breaks above $90,000 despite three attempts this week alone.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Why the Disconnect?Several factors are muting Bitcoin’s response to what should be favorable macro conditions.
First, year-end liquidity is thin. Holiday trading volumes have amplified volatility while limiting conviction-driven moves. Second, institutional flows have turned negative — US spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen five consecutive days of net outflows totaling over $825 million, according to SoSoValue data.
Source: SoSoValueThird, the Bank of Japan’s rate hike last week to a three-decade high has kept markets on edge. Although the yen weakened rather than strengthened after the decision — limiting carry trade unwind pressure — uncertainty over the BOJ’s future path continues to weigh on risk appetite.
2026: Delayed Rally?The bullish case isn’t dead, just deferred. Some analysts expect the dollar to weaken further in 2026, particularly if US monetary easing exceeds current market expectations.
If that thesis plays out, Bitcoin’s muted response to current dollar weakness may reflect timing rather than a structural breakdown in the correlation. Once liquidity normalizes in January and Fed policy clarity improves, the yuan’s signal may finally reach crypto markets.
For now, Bitcoin watches from the sidelines as China flashes one of the clearest dollar-bearish signals in years.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:4619d ago
L1 Tokens Crushed in 2025 as SOL, AVAX Drop Over 65%: Report
Anas is a crypto native journalist and SEO writer with over five years of writing experience covering blockchain, crypto, DeFi, and emerging tech.
Has Also Written
Last updated:
December 25, 2025
Layer 1 blockchain tokens suffered severe depreciation in 2025, with major assets losing up to 73% of their value despite sustained developer activity, according to the latest End-of-Year report from OAK Research.
While Bitcoin maintained relative strength throughout the year, alternative Layer 1 tokens experienced brutal sell-offs that exposed structural weaknesses in tokenomics and market positioning.
The report reveals a decisive shift from speculation to fundamental value creation, with the market punishing protocols unable to show genuine economic activity.
Source: OAK ResearchUser Reallocation Masks Market StagnationThe year witnessed massive user redistribution rather than overall growth, with total Monthly Active Users declining 25.15% across major chains, according to the report’s blockchain metrics analysis.
Solana suffered the steepest decline, losing nearly 94 million users (a drop of more than 60%), while BNB Chain almost tripled its user base by capturing fleeing participants.
Layer 2 networks experienced similar divergence. Base demonstrated the strongest growth, with TVL rising 37.2% to $4.41 billion, according to the report, solidifying its position through Coinbase’s distribution advantage.
Meanwhile, Optimism saw TVL contract 63%, dropping from nearly $2 billion to $786 million as capital rotated toward more aggressive competitors.
Token Performance Reflects Brutal RealityPrice action told an unforgiving story. Among major Layer 1 tokens monitored since January, only two finished positive:
BNB gained 18.2%.
TRX rose 9.8%.
The remainder suffered catastrophic losses, with Solana dropping 35.9% and newer entrants like TON and AVAX falling over 67%.
Layer 2 tokens fared even worse despite technical progress.
Source: OAK ResearchThe report documents that Optimism and zkSync Era both posted declines exceeding 84%, while Polygon and Arbitrum fell by more than 73%.
Only Mantle managed a modest 8.3% gain, attributed to concentrated supply control rather than fundamental strength.
The report identifies several converging forces behind the decline. They can be summed up into three main reasons:
Overleveraged tokenomics with continuous unlock schedules.
Lack of credible value-capture mechanisms linking network usage to token demand.
Institutional preference for Bitcoin and Ethereum over smaller-cap alternatives.
Developer Activity Diverges From PriceDespite price carnage, developer activity remained robust across select ecosystems, according to data from Electric Capital cited in the report.
The EVM Stack maintained the largest developer base, with 17,473 total contributors (updated), including 5,405 full-time developers, representing over 32% of activity.
Bitcoin posted the strongest two-year growth in full-time developers among major ecosystems, rising 90.5% to 1,003 contributors.
Source: Electric CapitalSolana and the broader SVM Stack grew 75.8% over two years to 4,578 full-time developers, demonstrating sustained technical ambition despite brutal token performance.
Overall, the developer ecosystem is growing, but the disconnect between their activity and token prices revealed what the report terms as “market maturation.”
Source: Electric CapitalTeams continued building through down cycles, but speculative capital no longer rewarded infrastructure without clear paths to revenue generation.
Revenue Meta Emerges as CriterionThe fundamental lesson of 2025 became inescapable, according to the report’s economic analysis. The report asserts that protocols without credible revenue streams are at risk of extinction.
The industry pivoted decisively toward the “revenue meta,” where actual cash flows mattered more than narrative.
Stablecoin issuers dominated revenue generation, accounting for 76% of income among top protocols.
Tether and Circle combined generated $9.8 billion annually, while derivatives platforms like Hyperliquid added $1.1 billion through sustainable fee-based models.
Source: OAK ResearchThe report also pointed out a harsh truth that generic Layer 1s and Layer 2s lacking differentiation could not compete.
Networks required 10x improvements in speed, cost, or security to justify independent existence.
Outlook Remains ChallengingLooking toward 2026, infrastructure tokens face continued headwinds despite regulatory clarity in key markets, the report concludes.
The combination of high inflation schedules, insufficient demand for governance rights, and concentration of value capture in base layers suggests further consolidation ahead.
The overall sentiment in the altcoin market heading into 2026 remains cautious, particularly as they’re experiencing a steep decline never seen before.
Source: OAK ResearchProtocols that generate meaningful revenue may stabilize, but they remain subject to Bitcoin’s volatility and persistent unlock pressure from early investors.
For existing Layer 1 tokens, the report asserts that survival depends on Ethereum and Solana, and that renewed institutional adoption might restore hope.
Without leadership from market majors, generic infrastructure tokens will continue to trend toward irrelevance as capital concentrates in protocols that show economic value rather than technological novelty alone.
Follow us on Google News
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 05:5919d ago
USDC Is Being Used for More Than Trading, and Bybit Is Expanding Support on XDC
As 2025 winds down, stablecoins like USDC are being used for more than just trading. They are increasingly part of payments, business transfers, and routine movement of funds, not only activity tied to market cycles. As more money moves more often, the way those transfers settle has started to matter far more than it used to.
That change has put pressure on existing blockchain networks. Activity picked up over the second half of the year, and during busy periods this showed up through higher fees, slower confirmations, and less predictable transfer costs.
On Ethereum, for example, sending USDC late in 2025 has often cost anywhere from a few dollars to well over ten dollars during periods of congestion, meaning even a basic transfer can end up costing more than expected.
By the second half of the year, fee volatility had become another familiar issue. Gas-based pricing means the cost of a stablecoin transfer can change quickly depending on network conditions, making routine payments harder to plan for traders, businesses, and treasury teams. In practice, once exchange and transfer fees are factored in, the cost advantage of using stablecoins can narrow more than many users expect.
That’s where Bybit’s decision to add USDC support on the XDC Network fits in. As stablecoin transfers become part of everyday activity, exchanges are under pressure to offer routes that are easier to manage and more predictable. How quickly and cheaply funds can move now matters as much as access itself.
“Most users don’t care about blockchain labels anymore. They care about whether a transfer clears quickly and what it costs them in the end,” said Angus O’Callaghan, head of trading and markets at XDC Network. “If stablecoins are going to function as everyday financial tools, the infrastructure underneath them has to feel reliable, not stressful.”
Bybit Waives USDC Fees on XDC and Launches $200,000 Reward Program
For most stablecoin users, access isn’t the problem anymore. USDC is already available on nearly every major exchange. What people care about now is whether moving funds actually works the way they need it to: quickly, regularly, and without having to think twice about the cost.
Bybit’s recent changes make sense within this context. Alongside opening another route for USDC transfers, the exchange is waiving withdrawal fees on XDC from December 1, 2025 through January 1, 2026, and offering a 200,000 USDC reward pool for new users who register and make qualifying deposits.
From a user point of view, this is less about features and more about convenience. When transfers start to feel expensive or unpredictable, people naturally change how they move money. Some wait longer to transfer, others batch payments, and some avoid smaller transactions altogether. Having another option available makes those decisions easier.
For Bybit users, USDC on XDC simply adds flexibility. It gives them another way to move funds when the usual routes don’t feel like the best choice, without changing what they’re using or how they think about stablecoins.
What This Signals for Exchanges
Bybit’s recent move around USDC transfers reflects a change that’s starting to show up across the exchange landscape. While Bybit has taken a clear step in expanding how users can move funds, it’s also part of a wider pattern playing out over the past few weeks.
BTSE, KuCoin, MEXC, Gate.io, Bitrue, and Pionex have also expanded support for XDC, enabling deposits, withdrawals, and trading. Taken together, these moves point to growing interest among exchanges in settlement networks that can handle regular transfer activity without the fee swings seen on more congested chains.
For exchanges, the reasoning is largely practical. As stablecoin flows increase, relying on a small set of networks can make platforms more exposed to sudden cost changes and slower settlement during peak periods. Adding alternative routes gives exchanges more flexibility, helps smooth out those pressures, and offers users more consistent ways to move funds without changing the assets they already use.
All of this is also happening as stablecoins start to be treated more like real payment tools. In the U.S., proposals such as the GENIUS Act are focused on putting clearer rules around how stablecoins are issued and used, especially for payments and institutional activity. As that happens, the way stablecoins move between platforms and networks becomes more than a technical detail and part of what users and institutions expect by default.
“When stablecoins start getting used outside of trading, the conversation changes,” O’Callaghan added. “Once there are clearer rules around how they’re meant to work, like what’s being discussed with the GENIUS Act, people stop treating transfers as experiments. They expect them to behave like regular payments: to go through on time, at a cost they can understand, and without needing to second-guess every move.”
XDC in Practice
XDC Network is mostly used for practical, behind-the-scenes work rather than consumer-facing crypto activity. It’s been used in areas like trade finance, real-world asset tokenization, and settlement processes where systems need to work consistently and without surprises.
That same setup also works well for moving stablecoins. Transfers on XDC tend to go through quickly and usually cost very little, which matters more now that stablecoin transfers became more common. For people or businesses sending USDC often, lower and more predictable costs make those transfers easier to manage over time.
This is starting to show in the data. The amount of USDC issued on XDC has continued to rise and recently passed $200 million, indicating that usage is moving beyond early tests and into more regular activity. Rather than brief spikes, the numbers point to steady use by participants who move funds often.
Image source: USDC.COOL
From XDC’s side, integrations like Bybit’s are mainly about being useful. The network is being used as another place where stablecoin transfers can happen reliably, rather than as something meant to attract attention on its own.
XDC was also designed with institutional payment flows in mind, where predictable settlement and consistent costs matter more than short-term optimization. That makes it practical for businesses and financial institutions moving stablecoins at scale, where delays or sudden fee swings quickly turn into operational problems.
That focus is already showing up in how the network is being used. Beyond basic transfers, XDC supports more complex financial workflows, including global payments, tokenized settlement, and stablecoin-based liquidity. Assets like USDC are increasingly used within these flows, including as collateral, and more than $500 million worth of assets have already been tokenized and settled on the network.
Image source: TradeFi Network
This kind of activity is especially relevant for trade finance and cross-border settlement, where funds need to move reliably across jurisdictions rather than fluctuate with market conditions. As more payment and trade processes move on-chain, infrastructure that can handle steady, high-volume transfers becomes less of a nice-to-have and more of a requirement.
Closing
In the end, decisions like Bybit’s USDC support on XDC are not about any single network or promotion and more about how exchanges are adjusting to a maturing market. For the exchange, offering another way to move USDC is part of that adjustment – making sure the experience holds up not just during quiet periods, but when activity picks up and small frictions start to matter. XDC’s role in that setup reflects how infrastructure choices are becoming part of the exchange’s responsibility, even if they stay largely out of sight.
“Good infrastructure doesn’t draw attention to itself,” O’Callaghan concludes. “When it works properly, users barely think about it, and that’s usually the goal.”
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 06:0019d ago
Is this Bitcoin's bottom? Extreme fear around MicroStrategy may signal
Michael Saylor’s Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy) has long acted as the biggest institutional buyer of Bitcoin.
However, as 2025 ends, the conversation around the company has shifted.
Bitcoin has fallen from its October peak of $126,000 to about $88,000, and Strategy Inc. has paused its once-relentless buying spree.
This change has made investors nervous and raised fears that the company might be forced to sell its massive 671,268 BTC treasury, worth roughly $58 billion.
MSTR declining stock performance
As Bitcoin loses momentum, discussions about Saylor and Strategy Inc. have exploded online.
With the company holding over 3% of all Bitcoin [BTC], any sign of weakness is seen as a major risk, and MSTR’s 65% slide since July, from ~$456 to ~$158, has only intensified fears that the once-powerful “Bitcoin premium” is fading.
But despite the panic, Strategy Inc.’s financial setup is telling a different story.
The company uses long-term debt instead of short-term loans and has built a large cash reserve.
It started with $1.44 billion and later increased this to more than $2.1 billion, so it can survive downturns without selling any Bitcoin.
While social media spreads “liquidation” rumors, the balance sheet shows that Saylor is not close to being forced out of his position.
When was the fear shot?
That said, the climate of fear peaked in early December, when prediction markets signaled a 61% chance that MSCI would delist MicroStrategy.
If this turned out to be true, such a move would trigger billions of dollars in forced selling from passive funds.
Online critics embraced the news, driven by frustration and a clear desire to see the company fail, largely because they distrust Michael Saylor’s aggressive Bitcoin strategy.
However, extreme negativity often signals a classic market bottom. History shows that when panic becomes one-sided and less committed investors exit, prices often begin to reverse.
Current data indicates this shift is already happening. Public sentiment toward Saylor, which turned extremely hostile in mid-November, has started to stabilize in recent weeks.
The main red flag
However, a bigger issue now extends beyond Strategy Inc. because the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector faces pressure.
The top 100 BTC-focused companies hold more than 1 million BTC, showing how far Saylor’s model has spread.
But this concentration also makes them targets, as MSCI is reportedly considering excluding companies that keep more than half their assets in Bitcoin.
If MSCI implements this change, it could raise these companies’ borrowing costs and cut them off from the $15 trillion passive index market.
Analysts warn that MicroStrategy alone could face $2.8 billion to $9 billion in forced outflows if an exclusion happens.
However, because this remains hypothetical, the market may be overstating the threat to Strategy Inc.
In the end, the company’s strong reserves, long-term debt structure, and the broader institutional shift toward Bitcoin suggest that the current fear could mark a turning point, rather than the end of the Saylor era.
Final Thoughts
When traders openly root for collapse and prediction markets flash doom, markets often sit near emotional and directional inflection points.
The 65% stock drop signals stress, but not a broken balance sheet, especially with debt maturities pushed years into the future.
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 06:0519d ago
Bitcoin at 126K? In reality, it has never exceeded 100,000 dollars
There was a shout for the record. The networks lit up. Bitcoin had supposedly exceeded 126,000 dollars. A historic peak? Not so fast. This raw number, without filter, hides a much more nuanced reality. Galloping inflation, monetary erosion, and financial optical illusions have blurred reference points. Believing that BTC has crossed this symbolic threshold is to ignore that in today’s economy, the dollar no longer is worth what it was. And behind the numbers, there is the story we too often forget to…
In brief
Bitcoin’s peak in 2025, adjusted for inflation, remains under 100,000 dollars.
The inflationary economy distorts displayed records, masking bitcoin’s true current value.
Experts denounce a mistaken reading, distant from the original philosophy of cryptocurrencies.
Alex Thorn’s analysis places bitcoin in a more credible and transparent macroeconomic context.
The false peak of 126,000 $: when inflation catches up with the narrative
Has the BTC price really crossed the mythical six-figure threshold? Not if you adjust for inflation. Alex Thorn, analyst at Galaxy, reminds that the 126,000-dollar peak in October 2025 actually equals 99,848 dollars in constant 2020 dollars.
His analysis relies on the CPI, an index that reflects the gradual loss of purchasing power of the greenback. And this shift is far from negligible: the dollar’s value has dropped by 20% since 2020. The problem is that the media economy works with raw numbers. And the algorithms love that.
Thorn summarizes his thought in a tweet that went viral:
If you adjust bitcoin’s price for inflation using 2020 dollars, BTC has never exceeded $100,000. It actually peaked at $99,848 in 2020 value, if you can believe it.
The economy is distorted, but comparisons remain frozen. Bitcoin rises, sure, but in an environment where fiat currency is crumbling, nothing is that simple.
Crypto domestication: Bitcoin facing the old world’s tools
By reintroducing macroeconomic tools into crypto analysis, aren’t we betraying BTC’s original spirit? Inflation, real comparisons, seasonal adjustments… This is exactly what Bitcoin wanted to avoid at its inception.
On X, BitKane doesn’t hide his skepticism:
If we start looking at bitcoin’s price from the angle of “adjustment,” aren’t we simply recreating the same system? Aren’t we, by thinking in terms of seasonal adjustments, becoming the new central bankers?
This unease raises a deep tension: between purists, who see bitcoin as a tool of resistance to institutional economy, and those who push for its integration into macro logics.
This debate goes beyond BTC alone. Ethereum, with its increasingly institutional rollups, or stablecoins backed by state currencies, reflect this same dynamic. The whole ecosystem seems to be moving closer to a more structured, less rebellious model.
Inflation economy: normalization accelerates
It is not so much bitcoin that’s booming, but rather the dollar that’s wavering. This disturbing observation is unavoidable in an economy shaken by a cumulative inflation of 24% between 2020 and 2025.
Alex Thorn goes further. For him, 2026 promises to be too chaotic to be predictable. Yet, Galaxy maintains a bullish long-term view, estimating bitcoin could reach 250,000 dollars by the end of 2027, driven by the growing institutionalization of the market.
BTC becomes more mature, its volatilities flatten out, its options diversify. Even its “volatility smile” aligns with that of commodities. Everything seems to indicate that the crypto economy is structuring itself.
But in this quest for recognition, the risk is great: trading freedom for integration. When records are read without filter, we forget that real value is built with context, not just spectacular peaks.
What the numbers don’t always say
Bitcoin’s peak in 2025: $126,000 (nominal);
In 2020 value: $99,848;
Cumulative inflation 2020–2025: +24%;
Dollar purchasing power: −20% since 2020;
Current BTC price: 87,320 dollars.
Some will continue to believe it firmly. For them, Bitcoin has crossed the symbolic threshold. Regardless of adjustments. And despite doubts, a segment of enthusiasts already projects a BTC at 180,000 dollars by 2026. The economy divides. So do the numbers.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Mikaia A.
La révolution blockchain et crypto est en marche ! Et le jour où les impacts se feront ressentir sur l’économie la plus vulnérable de ce Monde, contre toute espérance, je dirai que j’y étais pour quelque chose
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2025-12-25 11:3518d ago
2025-12-25 06:0919d ago
1 Thing About Dogecoin That's an Absolute Deal Breaker
Surprisingly, Dogecoin has been around for over a decade.
When the cryptocurrency Dogecoin (DOGE 1.60%) emerged in late 2013, few thought it would last long, primarily because it was created as a joke. Over a decade later, Dogecoin has a market cap of roughly $22 billion and is the ninth-largest cryptocurrency in the world.
Dogecoin's success came from its ability to tap into social media and virality in a way that few assets ever had before. People found the token and its Shiba Inu mascot to be a fun and fascinating financial experiment. Celebrity businessmen like Mark Cuban and Elon Musk were also fans of Dogecoin and even allowed their various businesses to accept it as a form of payment.
Image source: Getty Images.
Given how long Dogecoin has been around, I suspect it has staying power for as long as crypto remains relevant, and the sector doesn't seem as if it's going away anytime soon. Still, there's one thing about Dogecoin that is an absolute deal breaker for me.
Today's Change
(
-1.60
%) $
-0.00
Current Price
$
0.13
No real-world utility
The big deal breaker is that I still do not believe Dogecoin's network has real-world utility. There are now thousands of cryptocurrencies, most of which can instantly send payments online through their own network, or a network they trade on.
Dogecoin has its own network, but it doesn't stand out from a technical perspective, only processing about 30 transactions per second (TPS). Now, there are various reports that could one day change. The team behind MyDoge, a digital wallet specifically for Dogecoin, launched a new initiative called DogeOS that raised close to $7 million to build a new Layer-2 blockchain solution, according to a CoinDesk report from May.
Layer-2 solutions are blockchain layers built on top of a main network for the purpose of processing transactions off chain, which boosts throughput without significantly increasing fees. This layer could also provide Dogecoin with the smart contract functionality needed to build decentralized applications (dApps) that power non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and gaming apps, thereby boosting engagement on Dogecoin's network.
After all, Dogecoin does have a fervent community, so this may be a new way to engage with its fans and drive demand for the token. Still, it remains unclear when this layer will be ready, and Dogecoin will still face significant competition from other networks that have been providing these services for years, and that will still be stronger from a technical perspective. Ultimately, I think Dogecoin faces an uphill battle to prove strong real-world utility, which is a deal breaker.
Bram Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-25 10:3418d ago
2025-12-25 04:0719d ago
AVAX Price Prediction: Targeting $13.22 Recovery Within 2-4 Weeks as Technical Momentum Builds
AVAX Price Prediction: Targeting $13.22 Recovery Within 2-4 Weeks
AVAX Price Prediction Summary
• AVAX short-term target (1 week): $12.50-$12.80 (+2% to +4%)
• Avalanche medium-term forecast (1 month): $13.00-$13.50 range (+6% to +10%)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $12.78 (20-day SMA resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $11.26 (immediate support matching 52-week low area)
Recent Avalanche Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest AVAX price prediction consensus from leading analysts paints a cautiously optimistic picture for the coming weeks. Blockchain.News issued the most bullish Avalanche forecast on December 24th, targeting $13.22 based on emerging MACD momentum despite current price action below key moving averages.
This aligns closely with earlier predictions from December 23rd ($12.50 target) and Hexn.io's AI-driven model forecasting $12.55 by today (December 25th). The convergence around the $12.50-$13.22 range suggests strong analyst consensus, with all three recent forecasts carrying medium confidence levels.
What's particularly noteworthy is that all analysts are focusing on the same technical catalyst: bullish MACD divergence occurring while AVAX trades near oversold territory. This creates a compelling setup for a relief rally.
AVAX Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Modest Recovery
The current Avalanche technical analysis reveals a cryptocurrency positioned for a potential bounce from oversold conditions. With AVAX trading at $12.26, the token sits just 3% above its 52-week low of $11.44, creating an attractive risk-reward ratio for buyers.
The MACD histogram reading of 0.0753 represents the most significant bullish signal, indicating momentum is shifting despite the overall negative MACD reading of -0.6507. This divergence often precedes price reversals, supporting the AVAX price target of $13.22 within the next 2-4 weeks.
RSI at 41.44 provides additional confirmation, sitting in neutral territory with room for upward movement before reaching overbought conditions. The Bollinger Bands position of 0.34 shows AVAX trading in the lower third of its recent range, historically a favorable entry zone.
Trading volume of $22.8 million on Binance provides adequate liquidity, though we'd prefer to see volume expansion above $30 million to confirm any breakout attempts above the $12.78 resistance level.
Avalanche Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for AVAX
The primary AVAX price prediction for the bullish scenario targets $13.22 as the initial resistance level, representing an 8% gain from current levels. This target aligns with the middle Bollinger Band at $12.78 plus additional momentum toward the 50-day SMA at $14.10.
For this scenario to unfold, AVAX needs to break above the 20-day SMA resistance at $12.78 on sustained volume. Once cleared, the next resistance cluster sits around $14.10-$14.38, where the 50-day SMA meets the upper Bollinger Band.
The most optimistic Avalanche forecast within a 4-6 week timeframe could see AVAX reach $15.50-$16.00 if broader crypto market conditions improve and network fundamentals continue strengthening.
Bearish Risk for Avalanche
The downside scenario involves a break below the critical $11.26 support level, which has held as both immediate support and aligns closely with the 52-week low. A sustained break below this level could trigger additional selling toward $10.50-$11.00.
Key risk factors include broader crypto market weakness, particularly if Bitcoin falls below $90,000, which historically pressures altcoins like AVAX. Additionally, any negative news regarding Avalanche's ecosystem development or regulatory concerns could accelerate downside momentum.
Should You Buy AVAX Now? Entry Strategy
Based on current Avalanche technical analysis, the answer to "buy or sell AVAX" leans toward selective buying with proper risk management. The optimal entry strategy involves scaling into positions around current levels ($12.20-$12.30) with additional purchases on any dip toward $11.80-$12.00.
Position Sizing: Limit initial positions to 2-3% of portfolio given medium confidence levels. Consider adding to positions only after confirming break above $12.78 resistance.
Target Management: Take partial profits at $12.80 (first resistance) and $13.22 (primary target), while holding core positions for potential extension toward $14.10.
AVAX Price Prediction Conclusion
The AVAX price prediction for the next 2-4 weeks targets $13.22 with medium confidence, representing approximately 8% upside potential from current levels. This Avalanche forecast relies primarily on bullish MACD momentum developing while AVAX trades near oversold conditions.
Key indicators to monitor:
- MACD histogram maintaining positive readings
- RSI breaking above 45 for momentum confirmation
- Volume expansion above $30 million during any breakout attempts
- Bitcoin maintaining support above $95,000 for broader market stability
Timeline: The prediction should play out within 2-4 weeks, with initial confirmation needed by breaking above $12.78 resistance. Failure to hold $11.26 support would invalidate the bullish thesis and require reassessment of the AVAX price target.
Confidence Level: Medium (65%) - supported by technical indicators but dependent on broader market conditions remaining stable.
Image source: Shutterstock
avax price analysis
avax price prediction
2025-12-25 10:3418d ago
2025-12-25 04:1119d ago
Aave Community Debates Protocol Adjustments and Governance Proposals
The Aave community is currently engaged in a pivotal discussion concerning the future of its protocol, as members debate various adjustments and governance proposals. This discussion, taking place across various online forums and communication platforms as of December 2025, carries significant implications for stakeholders within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. According to internal communications reviewed by CoinDesk, the outcome of these debates could influence the allocation of resources and strategic direction of the Aave protocol, affecting both current and future projects.
In the heart of these discussions is a proposed alteration to the protocol’s governance, which aims to refine decision-making processes and enhance community involvement. The proposal, introduced by a consortium of developers and community leaders, seeks to streamline voting mechanisms and improve the transparency of governance decisions. Proponents argue that these changes are necessary to maintain Aave’s competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.
The timing of this debate is critical, as Aave faces increasing competition from other DeFi platforms that are aggressively expanding their offerings. With Ethereum’s transition to its streamlined upgrade, codenamed “Glamsterdam,” and the continuous advancements in blockchain technology such as quantum computing, Aave’s ability to adapt and innovate is seen as crucial. The potential adoption of quantum-resistant algorithms, for example, has been a topic of discussion among Aave developers as they assess future-proofing strategies against technological threats.
Additionally, the introduction of a new governance proposal by Eigenlayer—a protocol focused on enhancing security and interoperability across different blockchain networks—has influenced Aave’s community deliberations. This proposal emphasizes the need for robust security measures and cross-chain capabilities, which are increasingly integral to DeFi platforms seeking to expand their user base and functionality. The integration of such features could position Aave favorably in a competitive landscape where interoperability is becoming a key driver of user adoption.
However, not all voices within the community are aligned with the proposed changes. Some members express concerns about the potential centralization of power and decision-making, arguing that the proposed governance model may inadvertently concentrate influence among a select group of stakeholders. This issue has been highlighted in community meetings and online discussions, with some participants advocating for alternative models that ensure a more equitable distribution of voting power.
From a regulatory standpoint, the Aave community’s discussions come at a time when global scrutiny on DeFi platforms is intensifying. Regulators are increasingly focused on ensuring compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, which could present additional challenges for Aave and its governance framework. The community’s ability to navigate these regulatory pressures while maintaining its decentralized ethos is seen as a critical test of its resilience and adaptability.
The Aave community’s debate is emblematic of broader trends within the DeFi sector, where governance structures are continually evolving to address technological, competitive, and regulatory pressures. As these discussions progress, the outcomes could serve as a bellwether for other DeFi platforms facing similar challenges.
In terms of immediate steps, the Aave community is set to vote on the proposed governance changes in early 2026. This vote will be closely watched by industry analysts and competitors alike, as it will determine the protocol’s direction and influence similar governance discussions across the DeFi sector. The results of this vote could also impact Aave’s market position and its ability to attract new users and developers in the coming year.
Post Views: 12
2025-12-25 10:3418d ago
2025-12-25 04:1419d ago
LINK Price Prediction: Chainlink Eyes $15.50 Recovery Despite Current Bearish Momentum - 30-Day Forecast
LINK price prediction shows potential 27% upside to $15.50 within 30 days as Chainlink approaches oversold territory, but must first break $13.08 resistance level.
LINK Price Prediction Summary
• LINK short-term target (1 week): $13.20 (+8.4%) - Testing SMA 20 resistance
• Chainlink medium-term forecast (1 month): $14.50-$15.50 range (+19% to +27%)
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $13.08 (SMA 20)
• Critical support if bearish: $11.61 (strong support zone)
Recent Chainlink Price Predictions from Analysts
The cryptocurrency prediction landscape for Chainlink has been notably quiet over the past three days, with no major analyst forecasts emerging. This silence often precedes significant price movements as the market consolidates before the next directional move. The absence of fresh predictions allows us to focus purely on technical indicators, which are currently painting a mixed but cautiously optimistic picture for LINK's near-term trajectory.
Historical patterns suggest that when analyst coverage drops during consolidation periods, the subsequent breakout tends to be more pronounced. This makes the current LINK price prediction particularly crucial for positioning ahead of potential volatility.
LINK Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Recovery
The Chainlink technical analysis reveals a cryptocurrency positioned at a critical juncture. Trading at $12.18, LINK sits precariously close to its 52-week low of $11.65, having declined 54.54% from its yearly peak of $26.79. This proximity to major support levels creates an asymmetric risk-reward opportunity.
The RSI reading of 39.09 indicates LINK is approaching oversold territory without being extremely oversold, suggesting room for both downward pressure and potential reversal. The MACD histogram at -0.0378 shows bearish momentum is weakening, though still present. Most telling is the Bollinger Bands position at 0.20, indicating LINK is trading in the lower portion of its recent range, historically a area where reversals occur.
Volume analysis shows $17.57 million in 24-hour trading, which is moderate but sufficient to support a meaningful price movement. The daily ATR of $0.77 suggests normal volatility levels, providing clear entry and exit parameters for traders.
Chainlink Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for LINK
The primary LINK price target in a bullish scenario is $15.50, representing a 27% upside from current levels. This target aligns with the midpoint between the SMA 50 ($13.54) and the immediate resistance at $15.01. For this bullish case to materialize, LINK must first reclaim the SMA 20 at $13.08, which would signal the beginning of a trend reversal.
The path to $15.50 involves several technical milestones. Initial resistance at $13.08 must give way to allow LINK to challenge $13.54 (SMA 50). Once above this level, the next significant hurdle sits at $15.01 (immediate resistance), before targeting the upper Bollinger Band near $14.58 and ultimately the $15.50 price objective.
Trading volume above $25 million daily would provide confirmation of this bullish trajectory, while RSI readings above 50 would indicate renewed buying interest.
Bearish Risk for Chainlink
The bearish scenario for this Chainlink forecast centers on a breakdown below the critical $11.61 support level. Should this occur, LINK could retest its 52-week low at $11.65 before potentially declining toward $10.50-$11.00, representing a 14-20% downside risk.
Warning signs for this bearish outcome include RSI falling below 35, MACD histogram declining further into negative territory, and daily trading volume dropping below $12 million. The proximity to the 52-week low means limited downside cushion exists, making risk management paramount.
Should You Buy LINK Now? Entry Strategy
The current technical setup suggests a staged approach to buying LINK. Conservative investors should wait for a clear break above $13.08 with volume confirmation before establishing positions. This level represents the SMA 20 and would signal the first step in trend reversal.
Aggressive traders might consider dollar-cost averaging between current levels and $11.74 (immediate support), with strict stop-losses below $11.50. This approach capitalizes on the proximity to major support while limiting downside exposure.
Position sizing should remain conservative given the mixed signals. Allocating no more than 2-3% of portfolio to LINK at these levels provides adequate exposure while managing risk. Entry points of $12.00-$12.20 offer favorable risk-reward ratios targeting the $15.50 objective.
LINK Price Prediction Conclusion
This LINK price prediction carries medium confidence based on technical indicators showing early signs of stabilization near critical support levels. The base case scenario targets $13.20 within one week and $15.50 within 30 days, contingent on breaking above SMA 20 resistance at $13.08.
Key indicators to monitor for confirmation include RSI movement above 42, MACD histogram turning positive, and daily volume exceeding $20 million. Invalidation signals would be a close below $11.50 or RSI dropping below 32.
The timeline for this Chainlink forecast spans 30 days, with initial confirmation or rejection expected within 5-7 trading days as LINK either breaks above or falls below its current consolidation range. Given the proximity to 52-week lows and oversold conditions, the risk-reward ratio favors cautious optimism for patient investors willing to weather potential near-term volatility.
Image source: Shutterstock
link price analysis
link price prediction
2025-12-25 10:3418d ago
2025-12-25 04:2119d ago
UNI Price Prediction: Targeting $6.53 by December 30th as MACD Shows Bullish Momentum
UNI price prediction points to $6.53 target within a week as bullish MACD histogram and neutral RSI position suggest 12.6% upside potential for Uniswap.
UNI Price Prediction Summary
• UNI short-term target (1 week): $6.53 (+12.6%)
• Uniswap medium-term forecast (1 month): $6.17-$7.20 range
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $6.25 (Upper Bollinger Band)
• Critical support if bearish: $4.85 (Strong Support/Lower Bollinger Band)
Recent Uniswap Price Predictions from Analysts
Multiple recent Uniswap forecast reports from leading crypto analysts align on a bullish short-term outlook for UNI. The consensus UNI price prediction targets $6.53, representing approximately 12.6% upside from current levels of $5.80.
Blockchain.News analysts issued two consecutive UNI price prediction reports, maintaining confidence in the $6.53 UNI price target through December 26th. Their technical analysis cited bullish MACD momentum as the primary driver, which aligns perfectly with current market data showing a MACD histogram reading of 0.0955.
The most significant long-term catalyst identified is Uniswap's 'UNIfication' proposal, which FXEmpire analysts rate with high confidence. This proposal plans to burn 100 million UNI tokens while implementing protocol fee burns, creating deflationary pressure that could drive substantial price appreciation beyond the immediate Uniswap forecast timeframe.
UNI Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Breakout
Current Uniswap technical analysis reveals a convergence of bullish signals supporting the $6.53 UNI price target. The MACD histogram's positive reading of 0.0955 indicates strengthening bullish momentum, while the neutral RSI at 50.66 suggests UNI has room to move higher without entering overbought territory.
UNI's position within the Bollinger Bands at 0.68 places it in the upper portion of the trading range but below the critical $6.25 resistance level. This positioning is optimal for a breakout scenario, as it demonstrates accumulation without excessive buying pressure.
The 24-hour trading volume of $20.47 million on Binance provides adequate liquidity to support the predicted price movement. UNI's recent 1.86% daily gain demonstrates the beginning of momentum that could carry through to the $6.53 target.
Uniswap Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for UNI
The primary UNI price target remains $6.53, achievable through a break above the Upper Bollinger Band at $6.25. This represents the first major resistance level that must be conquered for the bullish Uniswap forecast to materialize.
Extended bullish targets include the 50-day SMA at $6.18, which UNI must reclaim to signal a trend reversal from the current consolidation phase. A sustained move above $6.53 could target the immediate resistance at $6.50, with potential extension toward $7.20 if momentum persists through January 2026.
The 'UNIfication' proposal adds fundamental support to technical projections, potentially driving UNI toward its 200-day SMA at $7.90 over the medium term.
Bearish Risk for Uniswap
Downside protection for UNI exists at the 20-day SMA of $5.55, which has provided support during recent consolidation. A breakdown below this level would target the Lower Bollinger Band and strong support at $4.85.
The critical bearish scenario involves UNI breaking below the 52-week low of $4.88, which would invalidate all bullish predictions and potentially target $4.74 as identified in recent analyst reports. This outcome appears unlikely given current technical positioning but represents the primary risk to monitor.
Should You Buy UNI Now? Entry Strategy
Based on current Uniswap technical analysis, the optimal entry strategy involves accumulation near current levels around $5.80, with additional buying on any dip toward the pivot point of $5.79.
Conservative traders should wait for a confirmed break above $6.25 before establishing positions, accepting slightly higher entry prices in exchange for greater confirmation of the bullish trend. Aggressive traders can begin accumulating immediately, given the favorable risk-reward ratio toward the $6.53 UNI price target.
Stop-loss placement should be positioned below $5.55 to limit downside risk while allowing for normal market volatility. Position sizing should account for UNI's daily ATR of $0.46, which indicates moderate volatility that could impact short-term price action.
UNI Price Prediction Conclusion
The convergence of bullish MACD momentum, neutral RSI positioning, and analyst consensus supports a high-confidence UNI price prediction targeting $6.53 within the next week. This represents a 12.6% upside opportunity with manageable downside risk to the $5.55 support level.
Key indicators to monitor include MACD histogram progression, RSI movement toward overbought levels above 70, and volume confirmation on any breakout above $6.25. The prediction timeline extends through December 30th, with potential for extension into early January 2026 if momentum sustains.
The buy or sell UNI decision favors accumulation at current levels, given the favorable technical setup and strong fundamental catalyst from the UNIfication proposal. However, traders should remain vigilant for any breakdown below $5.55, which would necessitate strategy reassessment and potential position reduction.
Confidence Level: HIGH - Multiple technical indicators and analyst consensus support the bullish Uniswap forecast, while risk management levels provide clear exit strategies if the prediction fails to materialize.
Image source: Shutterstock
uni price analysis
uni price prediction
2025-12-25 10:3418d ago
2025-12-25 04:2719d ago
BCH Price Prediction: Bitcoin Cash Eyes $625 Target Within 10 Days Despite Mixed Signals
BCH price prediction points to $625 target despite bearish MACD momentum. Critical $518 support holds key to Bitcoin Cash forecast success in coming weeks.
BCH Price Prediction Summary
• BCH short-term target (1 week): $625 (+6.7% from current $585.80)
• Bitcoin Cash medium-term forecast (1 month): $580-$650 range with potential for $670 breakout
• Key level to break for bullish continuation: $631.70 (strong resistance)
• Critical support if bearish: $518.50 (immediate support failure triggers $446.90 test)
Recent Bitcoin Cash Price Predictions from Analysts
The latest BCH price prediction consensus from major analysts reveals cautiously optimistic sentiment despite mixed technical signals. MEXC News leads the charge with the most aggressive Bitcoin Cash forecast, targeting $625 within 7-10 days based on bullish MACD divergence patterns.
CoinLore takes a more conservative approach, noting the neutral RSI at 49.33 while flagging the bearish SMA (10) signal at $576.79. Their analysis suggests patience rather than aggressive positioning. Meanwhile, Blockchain.News provides the most balanced perspective with their $580-$625 range prediction, acknowledging both the successful defense of $518 support and the potential for a 15-20% oversold bounce.
The analyst consensus aligns around the $625 BCH price target, though confidence levels remain moderate given conflicting momentum indicators. This convergence suggests institutional awareness of key technical levels driving the Bitcoin Cash forecast.
BCH Technical Analysis: Setting Up for Controlled Rally
Current technical positioning supports a measured bullish Bitcoin Cash technical analysis despite some concerning momentum divergences. At $585.80, BCH sits comfortably above its SMA 20 ($576.68) and well clear of the critical $518.50 support that triggered recent analyst attention.
The RSI at 54.35 provides the clearest bullish signal, sitting in neutral territory with room for upward expansion before reaching overbought conditions. This contrasts sharply with the MACD histogram at -1.0299, which signals weakening momentum despite the positive MACD line at 9.4163.
Bollinger Bands analysis reveals BCH trading at 0.6162 position within the bands, suggesting controlled volatility with the upper band at $615.93 providing initial resistance before the key $631.70 level. The 24-hour trading volume of $32.1 million on Binance indicates sufficient liquidity to support the predicted move to $625.
The most compelling technical factor supporting the BCH price prediction lies in the moving average structure. All major SMAs (7, 20, 50, 200) show bullish alignment with the 7-day SMA at $589.36 providing immediate dynamic support.
Bitcoin Cash Price Targets: Bull and Bear Scenarios
Bullish Case for BCH
The primary bull case targets $625 as the initial BCH price target, representing a 6.7% gain from current levels. This aligns perfectly with the upper Bollinger Band resistance and recent analyst predictions. Success at $625 opens the door to testing the 52-week high of $624.90, with a break above triggering momentum toward $650-$670.
The bullish scenario requires holding above $576.68 (SMA 20) as dynamic support while maintaining RSI momentum above 50. Volume expansion beyond the current $32 million daily average would provide critical confirmation of institutional interest supporting the Bitcoin Cash forecast.
A decisive break of $631.70 strong resistance transforms the outlook dramatically, potentially targeting the psychological $700 level within 4-6 weeks. This scenario gains probability if Bitcoin's broader market momentum provides tailwinds for major altcoins.
Bearish Risk for Bitcoin Cash
The bear case centers on failure of the $518.50 immediate support level, which would invalidate the current Bitcoin Cash technical analysis and trigger deeper selling. Initial downside targets include $508 (recent low) before testing the critical $446.90 strong support.
The negative MACD histogram at -1.0299 provides the primary bearish signal, suggesting underlying momentum remains weak despite recent price stability. If RSI falls below 45 while volume increases, it would confirm distribution and support the bearish thesis.
A break below $446.90 would represent a significant technical failure, potentially targeting the $400 psychological level and threatening the broader bullish structure that has supported BCH since its $335 52-week low.
Should You Buy BCH Now? Entry Strategy
The current BCH price prediction supports a cautiously bullish approach with specific entry parameters. Primary buying opportunity exists on any pullback to $576-$580 (SMA 20 support area), providing a favorable risk-reward ratio targeting $625.
For aggressive traders, current levels at $585.80 offer acceptable entry with tight stops below $570 (EMA 12 at $577.74 provides buffer). This strategy targets the $625 BCH price target while limiting downside risk to approximately 2.5%.
Conservative investors should wait for confirmation above $600 before initiating positions, accepting reduced upside potential in exchange for higher probability setups. This approach targets $631.70 break with stops below $585.
Position sizing should remain moderate given the mixed momentum signals. Allocate no more than 3-5% of portfolio to BCH positions until technical clarity emerges around the $625 resistance level.
BCH Price Prediction Conclusion
The Bitcoin Cash forecast points to $625 as the primary target within 7-10 days, supported by analyst consensus and technical positioning above key moving averages. However, the negative MACD histogram introduces uncertainty that requires careful monitoring.
Confidence Level: Medium (65%)
Key indicators to watch include RSI maintaining above 52, daily volume expanding beyond $35 million, and most critically, holding $576.68 as support. Failure of these conditions would invalidate the bullish BCH price prediction.
The timeline for this prediction centers on the next 10 trading days, with $625 success opening extended targets toward $650-$670. Traders should prepare for increased volatility around the Christmas holiday period, which could accelerate or delay the predicted timeline.
Whether to buy or sell BCH depends on risk tolerance, but the current setup favors patient buyers at support levels over aggressive sellers, provided the $518.50 critical support continues holding firm.
Aave protocol, the most liquid lending hub in decentralized finance, is on the verge of a contentious vote. The voting period, ending December 26, will determine the ownership of the protocol’s brand, as well as the manner of fee distribution.
Aave may affect decentralized finance in 2026, as a key vote may change its ownership model. Aave is currently poised to shift ownership of its brands to a single entity, to be defined later. The proposal suggests that the Aave brand resources should belong to AAVE token holders.
The Aave vote puts three sides in conflict. On the one hand, Aave Labs has guided the protocol progress. Aave DAO, on the other hand, is trying to recoup access to trading fees. The third side of the conflict are side contributors, which sometimes use the Aave brand to promote and give legitimacy to their DeFi products.
Aave locks in more than $33B, and is one of the key hubs for liquidity, as well as third-party builders based on Aave V3 technology. The resolution on the ownership of the protocol brand may affect the protocol’s reputation and the willingness of contributors to build side products. The conflict of Aave ecosystem stakeholders may hurt the protocol’s influence in 2026, just as DeFi had recovered to a relatively sustainable level.
Is Aave moving toward the interest of AAVE token holders?
The one problem with the proposal is that it may run counter to the interests of AAVE token holders. Right after the proposal, AAVE tokens sank to a three-month low, trading as low as $146. Later, AAVE stabilized again above $150.
AAVE traded at a three-month low, after the rushed introduction of a proposal to shift the ownership of Aave brand assets to benefit token holders, instead of Aave Labs. | Source: CoinGecko.
The other problem is that big AAVE holders are pushing the vote away from retail owners. Just around the time of the vote, the protocol’s founder Stani Kulechov bought more AAVE on some of his known wallets. The current trend of the vote toward a ‘No’ suggests token holders will not benefit from the project’s future growth, while Aave Labs may retain outsized control on the brand and storefront assets. The proposal aims to be neutral, and only discuss brand ownership structure.
As a result, Kulechov is one of the most influential voters, supporting the full transfer of brands to a new entity. However, the proposal is not directed at Aave Labs explicitly, but at all contributors and entities that have attempted to use the brand, or abstained from calling themselves a part of Aave.
As of December 25, the proposal was 18 hours from ending, with 52% of votes against the transfer of brand ownership, 43% abstaining, and only 4% in favor. The overall consensus was that the vote was rushed, and should have gone through a temp check process first.
Who owns the Aave assets?
Aave DAO holders have relied on the implicit split and good faith in the ownership of Aave assets. Currently, the assets, brand, landing pages, and GitHub resources are split between Aave Labs, as well as external contributors like BG Labs. However, at any moment, brand ownership may be revoked or challenged, curbing contributors and token owners from self-representation.
The proposal raises the issue of this implicit ownership, and asks for explicit transfer of all assets. The circle of Aave contributors is also growing, meaning some entities and app builders have been using the brand for self-promotion and monetization. As a result, the proposal asked to define the ownership more clearly:
“Private entities clearly separated from the DAO should not be allowed to unilaterally attribute to themselves, implicitly or explicitly, the name “Aave” or the status of “being Aave”. With a plural organization like the DAO and the lack of a direct mechanism of self-representation, another entity doing so outside a service agreement or other model (e.g., franchising) weakens the DAO’s ability to control its own representation.”
The DAO also claims that failing to resolve the issue may be a threat to the decentralized model. The biggest problem is the idealistic view of third-party service providers, who are contributing to Aave DAO and expect compensation.
The proposal’s main point is that the token owners should have explicit control over all brand assets, controlling them through a governance process.
The decision, however, is at a gridlock, given the ability of whales to oppose the brand transfer. For now, Aave remains in its usual uncertain state, allowing Aave Labs to still claim ownership of brand assets.
Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program