A hacker operating a widespread “task scam” scheme has lost approximately 60 Bitcoins, valued at around $4.8 million, as a result of the recent Ledger hardware wallet hack. The stolen amount highlights both the scale and reach of the security breach affecting the crypto hardware wallet sector.
Scammer among major victims in hardware wallet exploitChainalysis, a blockchain analytics company, reported that the scam operator initially transferred illicitly acquired Bitcoin into three separate Ledger wallets on September 22. On October 9, these funds were consolidated and sent to a wallet previously linked to stolen assets.
Despite the significant loss to the scammer, there is currently no indication that the original victims of his scheme have recovered their funds.
Task scams often involve building trust with small payouts before pressuring individuals to deposit additional money under false pretenses such as a “negative balance.”
How task scams target individualsThe accused operator organized fake jobs and paid participants to carry out fabricated sales and reviews. After a period of building trust, victims were informed of an alleged negative balance and were persuaded to deposit their own money to receive promised payouts.
In 2024, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) described similar fraudulent schemes where small online tasks create the illusion of legitimate employment. The FTC estimated that about 20,000 reports concerning task scams had been filed in the first half of 2024, with overall job scam losses surpassing $220 million.
Tampered Ledger devices and method of attackAccording to a statement from Ledger, the perpetrators purchased genuine hardware wallet devices, implanted malicious components within them, and then reintroduced the tampered products into Southeast Asian distributor channels. These modifications enabled the collection of 24-word recovery phrases during device setup, giving attackers remote access to affected wallets.
Ledger maintains that its systems remain secure and has instructed authorized sellers to cease displaying devices openly, supplying them only at the time of purchase.
Mini dictionary: Ledger is a French company specializing in cryptocurrency hardware wallets, widely used for the self-custody of digital assets.
Damage assessment and expanding industry responseWhile Ledger has not provided an official loss total, Bitquery, a blockchain analytics firm, estimated that around $102 million was stolen from 324 wallets spread across six blockchains: TRON, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, and Polygon. This figure increased from a prior estimate of $86 million.
Bitquery identified CryptoBilis, a hardware wallet reseller operating in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines, as an origin point for the affected devices. Stolen funds showed coordinated movement, including $10 million in USDT that Tether subsequently froze. Further portions of the assets were traced through protocols such as Tornado Cash and THORChain.
BlockchainEstimated Stolen FundsNotable ActionsBitcoin~$60 millionLinked to task scammer lossEthereumn/aFunds moved via mixersTRONn/aIncluded in total loss countSolanan/aPart of affected walletsBNB Chainn/aPart of affected walletsPolygonn/aPart of affected walletsMini dictionary: Tornado Cash and THORChain are decentralized protocols that enable the mixing or swapping of cryptocurrencies, often used to obfuscate the origin and movement of digital assets.
Growing industry concerns and countermeasuresThe Ledger incident has intensified concerns regarding cryptocurrency security and the vulnerability of hardware wallet supply chains. TRM Labs reported 207 crypto attacks during the first half of 2026, with $972 million in losses. Notably, while infrastructure and operational breaches made up 15% of attacks, they accounted for 76% of overall losses.
Although the recent Ledger theft has captured industry attention, researchers have not identified a significant impact on overall cryptocurrency market prices.
Chainalysis observed that despite several high-profile thefts, on-chain economic activity decreased only 1.6% during a period when the broader crypto market capitalization dropped by about half, though these statistics predate the Ledger hack.
In response to ongoing threats, hardware wallet manufacturers and resellers are adjusting their security policies. Trezor, a leading hardware wallet provider, announced the termination of some reseller authorizations effective January 1, 2027. OneKey, another wallet producer, ended its relationship with CryptoBilis. Industry sources indicate that these measures aim to address supply chain weaknesses but restoring full trust in self-custody solutions remains a challenge.
Roční realizovaná volatilita Bitcoinu podle společnosti Grayscale klesla na 43 % z 81 % před pěti lety a nyní se pohybuje v rozmezí volatility akcií z indexu S&P 500.
Bitcoin’s one-year volatility has fallen to 43%, a level that now sits within the range of S&P 500 stocks, according to a new Grayscale report.
The comparison could help ease concerns among traditional investors, as inflation data keeps markets on edge.
What Volatility Means for BitcoinVolatility measures how much an asset’s price moves over time. Realized volatility, the measure Grayscale uses, tracks actual price swings over the past year.
Grayscale’s analysis puts Bitcoin’s current level in context. Its one-year realized volatility stood at 43%, down from 81% five years ago and below the 64% ten-year average.
Bitcoin’s $BTC volatility has declined over the past decade as the asset has matured, with deeper liquidity, institutional participation, and regulation.
Over the past year, Bitcoin’s realized volatility fell to 43%, down from 81% five years ago, placing it within the range of… pic.twitter.com/DYT6eNsTZa
— Grayscale (@Grayscale) October 15, 2026 The report also places that figure alongside stocks. Bitcoin’s volatility over the past year fell within the range of S&P 500 components. It was lower than the volatility of 19% of the index’s stocks. Even so, it remains above most individual names, and Grayscale says it no longer sits in a separate risk category.
The firm links the decline to market maturation. Deeper liquidity, institutional participation, and regulated access through spot ETFs have smoothed out extreme swings.
Perception is the report’s central message: Bitcoin’s reputation for high volatility may deter traditional investors.
Can Bitcoin Be Managed Like a Large-Cap Stock Today?Grayscale says the comparison matters for investors who already handle volatile positions. Position sizing, a standard tool in equity portfolios, can apply to Bitcoin too.
The latest price action shows why the debate matters. Bitcoin briefly fell near $80,000 after September CPI came in at 3.7% year over year, above the 3.6% expected.
Traders feared the Federal Reserve could keep rates high or raise them further. Still, BeInCrypto data shows Bitcoin recovering to about $82,285, up 0.81% over 24 hours and 1% over the week.
Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance. Source: BeInCryptoGrayscale adds a caution, however. One year of data cannot reveal how Bitcoin behaves across full market cycles, so the report invites a measured view.
For investors used to volatile large-cap stocks, Bitcoin’s swings may look less intimidating than history suggests.
ETF navázané na XRP zaznamenaly za 13 týdnů čistý příliv ve výši 1,8 miliardy USD, přesto XRP za posledních 24 hodin kleslo o 4,5 % na rozpětí 1,30 až 1,35 USD.
Ripple Labs, a blockchain payments company recognized for its fast, low-cost cross-border payment solutions, has seen its native token, XRP, attract significant institutional interest on Wall Street. Over the past thirteen weeks, XRP-powered exchange-traded funds (ETFs) accumulated a cumulative net inflow of $1.8 billion, according to data from analytics firm SoSoValue.
Institutional ETF demand led by Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, and CanaryETF trading data reflected a steady, sustained appetite for XRP among institutional investors. The three leading funds—Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, and Canary Capital—have driven this positive momentum during a 13-week streak of net inflows.
Bitwise’s XRP-linked ETF remains the market leader, having attracted $688.48 million in inflows to date. Franklin Templeton’s XRPZ fund follows, racking up $396.59 million, while Canary Capital’s XRPC product has drawn $325.47 million. All three ETFs maintain competitive fee ranges between 0.16% and 0.29%.
ETF ProviderCumulative InflowFee RangeBitwise$688.48 million0.16% – 0.29%Franklin Templeton$396.59 million0.16% – 0.29%Canary Capital$325.47 million0.16% – 0.29%A single-day inflow of $740,410 into XRP-linked ETFs was recorded yesterday, even as the overall crypto market faced downward pressure. This ended a three-day stretch without new investments during regular business days.
ETF momentum fails to boost XRP priceDespite persistent institutional interest, XRP’s price performance has not mirrored the ETF inflows. At the time of writing, XRP has fallen 4.5% in the last 24 hours and trades within a tight range of $1.30 to $1.35, according to CoinGecko.
This week, Evernorth debuted a $476 million fund on NASDAQ that incorporates XRP exposure. Market analysts have cited this new fund as a potential catalyst for improved sentiment if it delivers strong returns, potentially influencing the broader perception of XRP in traditional markets.
However, large holders—often referred to as crypto whales—remain cautious. Data suggest these influential market participants have recently reduced their XRP holdings, signaling skepticism about an imminent rally. The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF), a technical indicator that assesses buying and selling pressure, showed negative readings between -0.07 and -0.21 on various timeframes, indicating selling sentiment persists.
Mini dictionary: Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) is a technical analysis indicator that measures the volume-weighted accumulation and distribution of a security over a specific period, providing signals on buying or selling pressure in the market.
XRP ETFs continue to attract hundreds of millions of dollars from institutional investors, yet this robust demand has yet to trigger a sustained price increase for the underlying token on the spot market.
Market observers are watching to see if changing macroeconomic or geopolitical factors may eventually translate investor enthusiasm for XRP ETFs into upward price movement on crypto exchanges.
XRP traders who bet on higher prices are mostly losing money right now. Data from Hyperliquid perpetual futures trackers shows that up to 96.1% of XRP long positions were opened above where the token currently trades.
A post on X flagged the same pattern, noting that most net-long XRP positions were entered above the current price.
A volatile few days for XRP Between October 13 and 15, 2026, XRP traded in a range of approximately $1.28 to $1.50. It then settled somewhere around $1.30 to $1.34.
As of October 15, the token’s 24-hour range ran from $1.28 to $1.39.
There is one notable exception. A large long position worth approximately $47 million was opened at around $1.13, and it has stayed profitable through the recent turbulence.
Derivatives data paints a mixed picture On OKX, XRP open interest fell by approximately 29.7% between September 22 and October 14. The count dropped from 150.4 million contracts to 105.7 million.
Yet the traders who remain are leaning heavily bullish. The long/short account ratio reached 3.6:1 by October 14, meaning 360 accounts were long for every 100 short. That reading was the highest since mid-August 2026.
The coin-margined long-position share among top traders climbed to 84.2% by October 14, up 4.8 percentage points. Coin-margined contracts use XRP itself as collateral rather than a stablecoin. That setup amplifies exposure, because a falling price hits both the position and the collateral backing it.
Why the positioning matters With up to 96.1% of Hyperliquid long entries above spot, further declines could trigger liquidations. Each forced sale adds selling pressure, which can push prices lower and threaten the next batch of positions. The 3.6:1 long/short ratio suggests there is plenty of long exposure available to unwind if things go wrong.
Broader market context suggests continued inflows into XRP exchange-traded funds and declining exchange reserves, which hints at ongoing demand outside the leveraged futures market.
XRP’s recent low sat around $1.28, and a break below that zone could test how much margin these accounts actually have. Accounts with deeper pockets and better entries, like the $47 million position opened near $1.13, have more room to ride out swings that would wipe out smaller players.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Ripple integroval dolarový stablecoin RLUSD do systému Cross River Bank, což fintechovým společnostem umožní nepřetržité vypořádání a převody mezi tradičními sítěmi a blockchainem prostřednictvím jediného API.
Ripple has joined forces with Cross River Bank to integrate RLUSD, its U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, into the bank’s core operating system. This partnership aims to enhance institutional payment options by embedding blockchain-based RLUSD settlements into existing banking infrastructure.
Stablecoin integration targets seamless paymentsCross River Bank, a U.S.-based financial institution known for providing banking services to fintech companies, announced the RLUSD integration on October 15. The move will allow businesses to settle payments at any time and transfer funds between traditional payment networks and blockchain environments.
RLUSD is set to become accessible through Cross River’s proprietary Core Operating System. Transactions will gain support for the XRP Ledger, Ripple’s public blockchain protocol that enables high-speed, low-cost payments.
Businesses and fintech firms will be able to connect to RLUSD using a single API, eliminating the need to build their own blockchain infrastructure. This streamlines access to digital dollar payments for companies handling cross-border or real-time transactions.
Ripple emphasized in its public statement that RLUSD payments are now being integrated into the banking systems fintechs already rely on for their operations. The company also highlighted the benefit of 24/7 settlements and improved flexibility for intraday payment cycles.
RLUSD payments are now being embedded within the banking infrastructure fintech companies use daily, offering round-the-clock settlement and expanded flexibility for intraday payments.
According to Ripple, this integration will allow companies to handle treasury flows, cross-border transactions, and various payment networks without the complexity of multiple providers.
Broader payment capabilities for fintechsCombining RLUSD with Cross River’s established infrastructure introduces a new layer of interoperability for payment networks. Issuers and acquirers can handle intraday settlements more flexibly, leveraging both blockchain and conventional channels.
The new integration makes it possible to move funds between RLUSD and traditional U.S. dollars, supporting transfers by ways such as Automated Clearing House (ACH), wire transfers, and real-time payments—all through one banking and API platform.
This approach allows fintech companies to rapidly add stablecoin payment options to their services without building out new systems from scratch, helping them streamline operations for domestic and cross-border payments.
Adam Goller, Head of Fintech Banking at Cross River, noted that the integration will reduce reliance on multiple partners and simplify cross-border money movement.
Markus Infanger, Senior Vice President at RippleX, underlined the importance of bringing stablecoin solutions directly into banking frameworks, rather than treating them as siloed financial products.
RLUSD and the importance of the XRP LedgerRLUSD is Ripple’s stablecoin, each unit backed by cash, U.S. Treasury bills, and other liquid assets to guarantee a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar. Ripple maintains regular third-party attestations of these reserves.
The integration utilizes the XRP Ledger, a decentralized public blockchain that supports rapid and continuous transaction processing. On average, transactions on the XRPL finalize in three to five seconds and can be executed at any time of day.
By linking RLUSD to established banking platforms via the XRP Ledger, the partnership aims to make blockchain-based settlements accessible to businesses already using conventional financial tools. This could be particularly useful for fintech firms engaged in cross-border trade, merchant payments, and complex treasury operations.
Mini dictionary: Cross River Bank is a U.S. commercial bank specializing in real-time, API-based banking solutions for fintech companies. The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is a public and decentralized blockchain platform designed for fast, low-fee digital asset transfer and settlement.
Building on prior stablecoin initiativesCross River previously launched a stablecoin payments service in November 2025, tying digital currencies into its real-time banking system to link traditional and blockchain-based transactions.
This original platform was designed to support network settlement, merchant payouts, on- and off-ramp functionalities, and streamlined treasury management. RLUSD’s addition expands the suite of payment options available to companies operating on Cross River’s network.
Recent figures from Cross River’s latest announcement indicate RLUSD’s market cap has surpassed $2.5 billion, with over $1 billion in RLUSD issued on the XRP Ledger. This points to a growing role for RLUSD in institutional payments and settlements.
MetricRLUSD TotalIssued on XRPLMarket Capitalization$2.5 billion$1 billionThe impact of this integration will depend on the rate at which fintechs and payment networks adopt it. Currently, the service is active in only a limited set of U.S. states, so national coverage has yet to be achieved.
The expansion of RLUSD within Cross River’s core payment infrastructure aims to make blockchain settlement more accessible and efficient for a wide array of fintech partners, but actual adoption will reveal its long-term significance.
Companies already using Cross River’s banking solutions may gain a streamlined route to stablecoin settlements, reducing complexity and potentially improving settlement speed and flexibility.
Ethereum a jeho sítě L2 za 90 dní vypořádaly stablecoinové převody v hodnotě 16,75 bilionů USD, což představuje 77 % objemu napříč všemi sítěmi. Base z toho tvořila 8,5 bilionu USD.
Stablecoins can live on almost any blockchain. Over the past 90 days, most of their volume still flowed through one family of networks.
According to a report from Ethereum Institutional dated October 15, 2026, $16.75 trillion in stablecoin transfer volume settled on Ethereum mainnet and its layer-2 networks between July 15 and October 12, 2026. That works out to 77% of the $21.55 trillion in stablecoin transfers recorded across all networks over the same stretch.
The data comes from Token Terminal.
Where the money actually moved
The most interesting detail sits inside the total, in the breakdown by network.
Ethereum mainnet settled $7.1 trillion in stablecoin transfers during the period. Base, the layer-2 network, settled $8.5 trillion. Optimism handled $0.8 trillion, and a collection of other Ethereum layer-2s accounted for the remaining $0.35 trillion.
Base alone accounted for more than half of the Ethereum ecosystem’s $16.75 trillion total. The report places that result within a broader mid-2026 pattern: users and capital drifting toward lower-cost layer-2 networks, with Base capturing larger slices of the stablecoin transfer market.
Not exactly your morning coffee
Ethereum Institutional says the volume is driven mainly by large institutional transfers and DeFi-related flows. That includes flash loans and liquidity provision, not pure payment activity.
The report also notes that no new protocol launches or issuer-specific announcements occurred during the period. The volumes reflect ongoing trends rather than a sudden change in market structure.
Why the share matters more than the size
A 77% share of transfer volume signals that Ethereum’s ecosystem remains the default venue for serious stablecoin flows. The remaining 23% of volume, spread across other networks, represents a meaningful amount of activity. Ethereum’s lead is substantial. It is not a monopoly.
What this means for investors and builders
The Base figure complicates the story in an interesting way. Value captured by layer-2 networks does not necessarily flow back to Ethereum mainnet in proportion to the activity. A trillion dollars moving on Base generates fees on Base first.
For builders, stablecoin users appear to care about cost, and they are willing to leave mainnet to save on fees while staying inside the Ethereum ecosystem. Applications that ignore layer-2 networks may be missing where a large share of the activity now happens.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Komunita Starknetu hlasuje v nezávazném průzkumu o přechodu na samostatnou síť Layer 1 odolnou vůči kvantovým hrozbám. Token STRK zůstane zachován a mosty s Ethereem mají zůstat otevřené.
The Starknet community has begun voting to determine whether to explore a transition to a self-contained, quantum threat-resistant Layer 1 structure. The vote, which opened today and will last seven days, is non-binding.
At the heart of the proposal is the argument that a portion of Starknet’s security is tied to Ethereum’s infrastructure and update schedule. Specifically, the Ethereum bridge and data accessibility scheme are described as dependencies that Starknet cannot change on its own.
In contrast, it is argued that Starknet’s hash-based STARK proofs and computational structure provide an advantage in post-quantum security research. The standalone network option aims to bring more of this research directly under Starknet’s control.
The community announcement stated that regardless of which path is chosen, the existing token will remain STRK and no new tokens will be issued. It was also stated that the bridges from Ethereum to Starknet will remain open.
A “yes” vote won’t mean the network will immediately separate from Ethereum. First, research will begin, followed by detailed proposals and new votes. A “no” vote would mean that post-quantum security work will continue within the existing Layer 2 structure.
The chart shows the recent increase in STRK price.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
American Tower má 27. října 2026 zveřejnit výsledky; analytici očekávají EPS ve výši 2,84 USD a tržby 2,77 miliardy USD, což představuje meziroční nárůst o 2,16 %, respektive o 2,06 %.
American Tower (AMT - Free Report) closed at $181.36 in the latest trading session, marking a +1.09% move from the prior day. The stock's performance was ahead of the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.33%. Meanwhile, the Dow experienced a rise of 1.08%, and the technology-dominated Nasdaq saw an increase of 0.08%.
The wireless communications infrastructure company's stock has climbed by 1.71% in the past month, exceeding the Finance sector's loss of 3.99% and the S&P 500's gain of 1.41%.
Analysts and investors alike will be keeping a close eye on the performance of American Tower in its upcoming earnings disclosure. The company's earnings report is set to go public on October 27, 2026. The company is predicted to post an EPS of $2.84, indicating a 2.16% growth compared to the equivalent quarter last year. Alongside, our most recent consensus estimate is anticipating revenue of $2.77 billion, indicating a 2.06% upward movement from the same quarter last year.
Looking at the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates suggest analysts are expecting earnings of $11.11 per share and revenue of $11.04 billion. These totals would mark changes of +3.25% and +3.68%, respectively, from last year.
Investors should also note any recent changes to analyst estimates for American Tower. These revisions typically reflect the latest short-term business trends, which can change frequently. As a result, upbeat changes in estimates indicate analysts' favorable outlook on the business health and profitability.
Our research demonstrates that these adjustments in estimates directly associate with imminent stock price performance. Investors can capitalize on this by using the Zacks Rank. This model considers these estimate changes and provides a simple, actionable rating system.
The Zacks Rank system ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell). It has a remarkable, outside-audited track record of success, with #1 stocks delivering an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed an unchanged state. At present, American Tower boasts a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy).
Looking at its valuation, American Tower is holding a Forward P/E ratio of 16.16. This signifies a premium in comparison to the average Forward P/E of 11.44 for its industry.
Meanwhile, AMT's PEG ratio is currently 2.8. This metric is used similarly to the famous P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also takes into account the stock's expected earnings growth rate. REIT and Equity Trust - Other stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 2.05 based on yesterday's closing prices.
The REIT and Equity Trust - Other industry is part of the Finance sector. With its current Zacks Industry Rank of 85, this industry ranks in the top 35% of all industries, numbering over 250.
The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our individual industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Be sure to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and many more, on Zacks.com.
Vitalik Buterin uvedl, že Ethereum dokáže fungovat bez jeho přímého zapojení díky decentralizovanému vedení ze strany komunity. AI by podle něj mohla urychlit ambiciózní plán Lean Ethereum.
Most founders spend their careers making themselves indispensable. Vitalik Buterin keeps making the case that Ethereum should be able to run without him.
The Ethereum co-founder has again stressed that the protocol can progress without his direct involvement, as more community members take on responsibility for its core values. He made the point most recently at the Network State Conference 2026 in Singapore on October 9. It is a theme he has returned to repeatedly this year.
What Buterin said in Singapore
Buterin used the Singapore stage to describe a shift toward a widely distributed leadership model across the Ethereum community.
He also linked that shift to technology. Buterin said AI could speed up the “Lean Ethereum” roadmap, a planned overhaul meant to make the protocol more efficient.
Lean Ethereum is not a minor patch. The proposal aims to replace significant core components of the protocol, which makes it one of the more ambitious engineering projects in the ecosystem.
A smaller Ethereum Foundation, by design
In May, he said the Ethereum Foundation (EF) should become smaller and concentrate on a narrow set of core properties.
Those properties are censorship resistance, open source development, privacy and security. Everything else, in his framing, is fair game for other ecosystem participants to pick up.
Buterin also said at the time that his own personal influence would diminish.
He has described the EF as just one node among thousands in the Ethereum ecosystem.
The walkaway test
Buterin has a name for the standard he wants Ethereum to meet: the “walkaway test.” The idea is that the protocol should keep functioning through external contributions, even if any single team or person stopped showing up.
He emphasized Ethereum’s ability to pass that test at the 4th Hong Kong Web3 Festival on April 20, 2026.
Recent discussions in the community have also put weight on external support from key players across the ecosystem.
Not a new idea for Buterin
Back in 2021, at the “AskVitalikBA” conference, Buterin made the same basic point in plainer terms.
“Ethereum will exist with or without Vitalik Buterin.”
Concerns about how the EF would restructure as community involvement grew were already visible around that time.
What has changed is the specificity. In 2021, the idea was a philosophical statement. In 2026, it comes with a defined list of EF priorities, a named test, and a technical roadmap that Buterin thinks AI could accelerate.
What this means for Ethereum’s stakeholders
Buterin is actively trying to remove himself from that equation. If the walkaway test holds up in practice, Ethereum’s long-term story rests more on the depth of its contributor base than on any one name.
A smaller EF also changes the competitive dynamics inside the ecosystem. Work the foundation chooses not to do creates openings for other teams, companies and research groups.
The things to watch are concrete. One is how quickly the EF follows through on narrowing its focus to censorship resistance, open source, privacy and security. Another is which outside players step in to take on work the foundation sheds. A third is whether Lean Ethereum’s milestones actually arrive sooner, as Buterin suggests AI might allow.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
The world's largest meme token by market capitalization, Dogecoin has continued to face a steady price downturn since the new month began.
Amid this prolonged market volatility, the meme token has continued to witness increased sell pressure from traders who have begun to trade with caution.
Did this whale just sell?As of October 15, onchain monitoring firm Whale Alert showcased data revealing that it had spotted a Dogecoin whale transferring 300 million DOGE to the world's largest crypto exchange by volume, Binance.
HOT Stories
According to the data, the transfer happened in a single transaction worth about $24.1 million as DOGE was trading at around $0.0803 at the time.
You Might Also Like
While the transfer comes amid the ongoing October crypto market downturn, it has drawn attention from market participants who are watching closely to observe the behavior of traders, especially large holders.
Considering the timing of the transfer, the move has been perceived as a potential sell attempt, as it is commonly believed that tokens are often dumped on crypto exchanges like Binance to be sold.
Dogecoin price outlookIt is noteworthy that transactions like this alone do not typically confirm that a whale or the sender intends to sell the tokens.
As such, it is quite uncertain whether the move would have a potential impact on the price movement of Dogecoin, as it may be neither a bearish nor a bullish move.
Regardless, the transfer tends to briefly increase the amount of DOGE tokens available for sale on the exchange, which does not paint a positive outlook for DOGE's price.
Proti společnosti Hyliion Holdings byla podána hromadná žaloba jménem akcionářů kvůli údajným zavádějícím informacím o partnerství s VFG a obchodních příležitostech v datových centrech.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Hyliion Holdings Corp. (NYSE American: HYLN) between May 12, 2026 and June 23, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important October 27, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Hyliion common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Hyliion class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/hyliion-holdings-corp/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than October 27, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or omitted material facts concerning the credibility of its announced commercial pipeline, notably, the basis for management's confidence in its VFG Holdings ("VFG") partnership and the extent of Hyliion's evaluation of VFG's operational capabilities, financial resources, and ability to perform before announcing the "new data center partnership" as a significant commercial opportunity. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Hyliion class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/hyliion-holdings-corp/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/319279
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence?
Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Společnost Fortinet má 28. října 2026 zveřejnit zisk ve výši 0,86 USD na akcii a tržby ve výši 2,06 mld. USD, což představuje meziroční nárůst o 16,22 %, respektive o 19,58 %.
In the latest trading session, Fortinet (FTNT - Free Report) closed at $181.91, marking a -1.16% move from the previous day. The stock's performance was behind the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.33%. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 1.08%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, added 0.08%.
The network security company's stock has climbed by 7.15% in the past month, exceeding the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 1.62% and the S&P 500's gain of 1.41%.
The upcoming earnings release of Fortinet will be of great interest to investors. The company's earnings report is expected on October 28, 2026. On that day, Fortinet is projected to report earnings of $0.86 per share, which would represent year-over-year growth of 16.22%. Meanwhile, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenue is projecting net sales of $2.06 billion, up 19.58% from the year-ago period.
For the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $3.45 per share and revenue of $8.12 billion, which would represent changes of +25% and +19.4%, respectively, from the prior year.
Investors should also pay attention to any latest changes in analyst estimates for Fortinet. These recent revisions tend to reflect the evolving nature of short-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability.
Research indicates that these estimate revisions are directly correlated with near-term share price momentum. To utilize this, we have created the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model that integrates these estimate changes and provides a functional rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, running from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), holds an admirable track record of superior performance, independently audited, with #1 stocks contributing an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Within the past 30 days, our consensus EPS projection has moved 0.77% higher. Fortinet is currently a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
Looking at its valuation, Fortinet is holding a Forward P/E ratio of 53.4. Its industry sports an average Forward P/E of 53.96, so one might conclude that Fortinet is trading at a discount comparatively.
Investors should also note that FTNT has a PEG ratio of 3.09 right now. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. As the market closed yesterday, the Security industry was having an average PEG ratio of 3.11.
The Security industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 170, positioning it in the bottom 31% of all 250+ industries.
The Zacks Industry Rank is ordered from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
You can find more information on all of these metrics, and much more, on Zacks.com.
In the latest close session, Dell Technologies (DELL - Free Report) was down 6.8% at $473.39. This change lagged the S&P 500's 0.33% gain on the day. Meanwhile, the Dow experienced a rise of 1.08%, and the technology-dominated Nasdaq saw an increase of 0.08%.
The computer and technology services provider's stock has dropped by 9.83% in the past month, falling short of the Computer and Technology sector's gain of 1.62% and the S&P 500's gain of 1.41%.
Market participants will be closely following the financial results of Dell Technologies in its upcoming release. In that report, analysts expect Dell Technologies to post earnings of $6.63 per share. This would mark year-over-year growth of 155.98%. Our most recent consensus estimate is calling for quarterly revenue of $50.63 billion, up 87.47% from the year-ago period.
In terms of the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates predict earnings of $26.09 per share and a revenue of $195.68 billion, indicating changes of +153.3% and +72.35%, respectively, from the former year.
It is also important to note the recent changes to analyst estimates for Dell Technologies. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. Therefore, positive revisions in estimates convey analysts' confidence in the business performance and profit potential.
Our research reveals that these estimate alterations are directly linked with the stock price performance in the near future. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), possesses a remarkable history of outdoing, externally audited, with #1 stocks returning an average annual gain of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 0.13% higher. Dell Technologies is holding a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy) right now.
Looking at its valuation, Dell Technologies is holding a Forward P/E ratio of 19.47. Its industry sports an average Forward P/E of 19.47, so one might conclude that Dell Technologies is trading at no noticeable deviation comparatively.
One should further note that DELL currently holds a PEG ratio of 0.51. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. Computer - Micro Computers stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 1.58 based on yesterday's closing prices.
The Computer - Micro Computers industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 16, positioning it in the top 7% of all 250+ industries.
The strength of our individual industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, which is calculated based on the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within these groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Make sure to utilize Zacks.com to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and more, in the coming trading sessions.
Visa zahájila komerční využívání USDC k téměř okamžitému předfinancování přeshraničních výplat prostřednictvím Visa Direct; prvním partnerem je Inyo Global.
Visa moved its stablecoin payment capabilities from pilot programs into commercial production on October 15, 2026, letting businesses prefund cross-border payouts through Visa Direct using USDC in near real time. Payments infrastructure provider Inyo Global is the first enabler of the offering, according to Visa’s announcement.
The shift takes Visa’s stablecoin strategy from testing into live commercial operations, giving money transmitters, fintechs, banks and payment businesses a new way to fund international payouts outside traditional banking funding windows. It also marks the first time Visa has moved a stablecoin product into live commercial use on the Visa Direct rail.
From Pilot to Production Visa introduced two stablecoin pilot programs through Visa Direct in 2025: a prefunding pilot and a payout pilot. The prefunding test explored letting clients supply USDC to back their own Visa Direct activity, while the payout test explored settling funds to recipients on stablecoin rails. Both demonstrated how the assets could support cross-border funding, liquidity management and global money movement.
Those pilots now move into real-world commercial operations, with Inyo Global integrating the prefunding capability into its platform as the first enabler. Through a single connection, Inyo’s platform lets businesses onboard users, manage fraud and compliance, accept payments, and send domestic and international payouts across more than 180 countries, powered by Visa Direct. Clients can now prefund those payouts with USDC around the clock instead of relying only on traditional funding windows.
What Visa’s Stablecoin Payments Actually Do The new capability targets the way businesses fund cross-border payouts. Rather than waiting for traditional banking funding windows, an Inyo client can move USDC to prefund a Visa Direct payout in near real time, then settle in local currency on the receiving end. Visa frames this as a liquidity and money-movement tool for payment businesses, not a consumer product.
“The next chapter for stablecoins is adoption,” said Vira Platonova, Global Head of Visa Direct, adding that years of partner pilots are now translating into live implementations. Visa’s earlier stablecoin work includes adding settlement partners to its Visa Direct stablecoin network and connecting onchain lending to stablecoin card financing.
What It Means for Stablecoin Adoption The production launch is a step in Visa’s broader push to make stablecoins usable in everyday payment infrastructure, moving the assets from experimental pilots toward a standard way to fund cross-border payouts. Inyo Global co-founder Robson Dantas said the integration gives money transmitters and fintechs “a new way to fund their payouts, one that is available around the clock” through the same Inyo APIs they already use.
Visa said it is working with clients and partners to bring stablecoin-enabled capabilities to additional money-movement use cases around the world, signaling that more enablers beyond Inyo Global are likely to follow. The rollout gives the stablecoin sector a concrete production use case from a major payment network, a sign that dollar-backed tokens are shifting from speculation toward operational settlement infrastructure. The announcement does not state how much volume is expected to move through the new channel or when additional partners will go live.
Frequently Asked Questions What did Visa announce about stablecoins? Visa moved its Visa Direct stablecoin capabilities from pilot to commercial production on October 15, 2026, with payments infrastructure provider Inyo Global as the first enabler.
What can businesses do with Visa’s stablecoin payments? They can prefund cross-border payouts through Visa Direct using USDC in near real time, instead of relying only on traditional banking funding windows.
Who is Inyo Global? Inyo Global is a payments infrastructure provider serving money transmitters, fintechs, banks and payment businesses; its platform handles onboarding, fraud and compliance, and payouts across more than 180 countries.
Does this change how consumers pay? The announcement focuses on business-to-business money movement for companies that run cross-border payouts through Visa Direct, and does not introduce a consumer-facing product.
Will more partners join? Visa said it is working with clients and partners to bring stablecoin-enabled capabilities to more use cases, but did not name additional enablers or a timeline.
AUTHOR
Blockchain analyst specializing in the regulatory impact of government policies on the crypto industry. Known for his thorough research and clear, engaging writing, Emmanuel provides insightful analysis on the latest trends, market shifts, and emerging crypto innovations. His work aims to educate and inform both novice and experienced readers, offering expert perspectives on the fast-evolving world of digital assets. With a passion for staying ahead of the curve, Ogwu is a trusted voice in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space.
Gold Is Testing Its 200-Day SMA—These 3 Mining Stocks Are the PlayRoyal Gold NASDAQ: RGLD said it has expanded its portfolio, repaid debt and delivered record financial results following its 2025 acquisitions of Sandstorm and Horizon, while maintaining its focus on precious-metals royalties and streams rather than mine operations.
During a virtual non-deal roadshow, Alistair Baker, Royal Gold’s senior vice president of investor relations and business development, described the company as a high-margin business designed to generate cash flow from precious metals without direct exposure to mining operating costs.
Get Royal Gold alerts:
The Best Way to Invest in Gold Is...Baker said the Sandstorm and Horizon transactions added scale, diversification and growth to Royal Gold’s portfolio. He said the company has subsequently simplified certain aspects of those acquisitions, including collapsing intercompany arrangements, selling roughly $200 million in non-core equity positions and restructuring more complex arrangements involving Bear Creek and Relief Canyon.
Portfolio additions and financial performance
Royal Gold added two major streams during 2025, according to Baker: a $1 billion gold stream on First Quantum’s Kansanshi operation in Zambia and a $200 million investment connected to the Warintza gold-copper development project in Ecuador.
BHP Stock: The Under-the-Radar Growth Story in CommoditiesThe company also cited positive operating and development updates across its portfolio. Baker said Glencore began mining the Alumbrera pit at the MARA project in Argentina six months ahead of schedule after approval of its RIGI application. Royal Gold also received its first delivery under the Platreef stream agreement, while development at Hod Maden was about 25% complete, he said.
Baker said Royal Gold recorded revenue, cash flow and earnings records during the first quarter, followed by record operating cash flow in the second quarter. Since completing the Sandstorm and Horizon transactions, the company has repaid $1 billion of debt and repurchased and canceled about $30 million of shares, he said.
The company also increased its dividend for the 25th consecutive year and extended portfolio reserve life by about 25% to 18 years, Baker said.
Royal Gold expects the midpoint of its guidance to be about 30% above the prior year’s level.
Over five years, the company expects the midpoint of guidance to be about 17% above the current year’s level.
Baker said growth is expected to come from multiple assets rather than relying on a single operation.
Royalty model and diversification
Baker emphasized that Royal Gold does not operate mines and therefore does not directly bear mining labor, energy, consumables or capital-cost inflation. He said the company’s trailing 12-month EBITDA margin was about 83%, while cash general and administrative expense represented about 3% of revenue.
Royal Gold has 39 employees and a market capitalization of approximately $20 billion, Baker said. The company’s portfolio includes more than 360 assets, including 80 revenue-producing properties, about 30 development-stage assets and more than 250 exploration or evaluation-stage properties.
Nine of Royal Gold’s top 10 assets are already producing revenue, according to Baker. The company’s counterparties include large mining operators, with First Quantum, Glencore and Rio Tinto among the companies recently added to its operator list.
Baker said the portfolio is primarily gold-focused, with additional exposure to silver and copper, and is weighted toward North America and other mining-friendly jurisdictions. He identified Canada, the U.S., certain parts of South America and Australia as jurisdictions where Royal Gold expects to continue seeking opportunities.
Development pipeline and Hod Maden position
Royal Gold expects contributions from several development projects over the coming years, including Robertson at the Cortez complex in 2027, with Hod Maden, Great Bear and Warintza expected later in the decade. Baker identified MARA and Fourmile as longer-term contributors expected beyond the beginning of the next decade.
At Khoemacau, Baker said an expansion is expected to increase Royal Gold’s silver deliveries by about 35% once it reaches full production, which he said was likely in the 2028-2029 period.
Addressing Hod Maden, Baker said Royal Gold reduced its direct equity interest in the project to 15% from about 30% and received an equivalent value in royalty exposure for the reduced stake. He said the company ultimately wants to eliminate its direct equity ownership in the project because that structure is not central to Royal Gold’s business model.
Baker said the project’s development plan, production outlook and timeline had not changed following the ownership restructuring, although the new operator, Lidya, was reviewing capital costs and execution plans. Royal Gold had already funded $70 million of its capital contribution and had about $65 million remaining, he said.
Capital allocation and valuation
Royal Gold added a $600 million uncommitted accordion feature to its revolving credit facility, which Baker said could provide up to $2 billion of liquidity if fully utilized. The board also authorized a share-repurchase program of up to $500 million.
As of June 30, the company had $400 million outstanding under its revolving credit facility, Baker said. He said Royal Gold subsequently made an additional $75 million payment and expected to make another $100 million payment, with a goal of reducing the balance to zero during the quarter. He estimated the facility’s cost at about 6% or slightly less.
Baker said Royal Gold believes its shares trade at a net asset value discount to larger royalty and streaming peers and near the low end of price-to-cash-flow multiples among both larger and smaller peers. He attributed part of that disconnect to the market’s focus on integration risks from the 2025 acquisitions, despite what he described as strong financial results and debt repayment.
He said the company expects its financial performance, debt reduction, dividend growth, share repurchases and progress at development projects such as Platreef and Robertson to serve as potential catalysts for a valuation re-rating.
About Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD)Royal Gold, Inc is a precious metals streaming and royalty company headquartered in Denver, Colorado. Rather than operating mines directly, the company finances mining projects and acquires interests that provide rights to purchase a portion of the metals produced from those operations or to receive royalty payments based on mine revenue.
Royal Gold's portfolio is primarily focused on gold, with additional exposure to silver, copper and other metals. Its interests include streaming agreements and royalties associated with projects such as Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic and Mount Milligan in British Columbia, Canada.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Royal Gold Right Now?Before you consider Royal Gold, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Royal Gold wasn't on the list.
While Royal Gold currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
With the proliferation of data centers and electric vehicles, the electric grid will only get more strained. Download this report to learn how energy stocks can play a role in your portfolio as the global demand for energy continues to grow.
Get This Free Report
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Spotové ETF navázané na Zcash zaznamenaly 14. října první denní čistý příliv od 22. září ve výši 3,68 milionu USD. Týdenní toky však zůstávají záporné.
Spot Zcash ETFs recorded their first daily net inflow since September 22, taking in $3.68 million on October 14, but weekly flows remain negative.
Spot Zcash ($ZEC) exchange-traded funds have recorded their first daily net inflow since September 22, a possible sign that investor demand for the privacy coin is returning after a weak stretch.
On October 14, the products took in $3.68 million, according to a Tokenpost report carried by Pluang. The same report said Zcash ETFs were the larger of two inflow stories that day, ahead of XRP funds, which drew $740,400. It also put Zcash ETF net assets at $645 million, with $179 million in cumulative inflows.
Weekly flows still negativeThe inflow is not large enough to turn the week positive. The funds would need strong sessions on Thursday and Friday to avoid a third consecutive week of net outflows.
The market backdrop has been uneven. Invezz reported on October 14 that ZEC was trading around $1,264 after gains on Tuesday and Wednesday, but that persistent withdrawals from Grayscale's Zcash fund were still weighing on demand. A later KuCoin market note said ZEC fell below $1,115 on Thursday, with macro pressure outweighing the isolated ETF inflow.
Background on the Zcash ETFThe main product is Grayscale's The Zcash ETF (ticker ZCSH). According to a Grayscale filing with the SEC, the fund launched on NYSE Arca on August 25, 2026, and its assets under management passed $500 million by September 8. The same filing said ZCSH was the only exchange-traded product offering spot exposure to ZEC at the time. It also noted that an investment in the fund is not a direct investment in ZEC.
ZCSH converted from the Grayscale Zcash Trust, which had traded over the counter. Its prospectus shows the trust historically traded at large premiums and discounts to the value of its holdings, a gap that the ETF structure is designed to narrow through share creation and redemption.
For now, a single day of inflows after weeks of weakness is a modest data point. Whether it marks a shift in sentiment will depend on flows over the coming sessions and on broader market conditions.
Sources
Pluang/Tokenpost: U.S. XRP and Zcash ETFs see $4.42M net inflows on Oct 14SEC filing: The Zcash ETF (ZCSH) press release, Form 8-KInvezz: Zcash jumps 6% in two days despite fresh Grayscale outflows
Fortitude Mining Holdings u Zcash překonala hash rate 5,0 GSol/s. Objednávka 9 000 těžebních zařízení Bitmain má zvýšit kapacitu o 145 % na přibližně 12,8 GSol/s.
Fortitude Mining Holdings has pushed its Zcash hashrate past 5.0 GSol/s, a milestone the company reached as of October 15, 2026.
The goal is ambitious: Fortitude wants to cement its position as the largest vertically integrated Zcash mining platform.
The jump came quickly. Earlier in October, the company’s hashrate sat at approximately 4.7 GSol/s.
What 5 GSol/s actually means Zcash runs on an algorithm called Equihash, so its hashrate is measured in “solutions per second” rather than the hashes per second Bitcoin miners talk about. A GSol/s is one billion of those solutions every second.
Fortitude’s slice of the Zcash pie is already substantial. In the first half of 2026, the company mined 72,696 ZEC, which works out to roughly 28% of network production over that period.
The operation runs across seven US sites with over 60 MW of power capacity under contract.
The Bitmain shopping spree In July 2026, the company placed an order for 9,000 Bitmain Antminer Z15 Pro miners. The price tag was about $31.5 million.
Those machines are expected to add 7.56 GSol/s to Fortitude’s fleet. The company projects that the order will lift capacity by 145%, taking its total to approximately 12.8 GSol/s.
In October 2026, Fortitude signed a letter of intent with Bitmain covering up to $100 million in next-generation mining equipment.
The commitment is non-binding. The planned $20 million refundable deposit for that deal is set to be paid in ZEC, rather than dollars.
The Hut 8 connection and the road to TUDE Fortitude is led by CEO Jaime Leverton, who previously ran Hut 8.
The company is preparing for a listing under the proposed ticker TUDE.
Alongside the listing preparation, Fortitude has been upsizing its credit facility and gearing up for acquisitions.
What this means for Zcash and investors A single operator producing around 28% of network output in the first half of the year is meaningful, and planned expansion could push that share higher if competitors do not keep pace.
The July order is expected to deliver a 145% capacity increase. Delivery timing, installation, and power availability all have to line up for those projections to become reality.
The Bitmain letter of intent carries even more uncertainty. Up to $100 million is a headline-friendly number, but a non-binding agreement can shrink, shift, or disappear before money changes hands.
The items to watch from here: whether the Z15 Pro fleet comes online and lifts hashrate toward the approximately 12.8 GSol/s target, whether the Bitmain letter of intent converts into a binding order, and how the TUDE listing and any acquisitions reshape the company’s balance sheet.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Spoluzakladatel Zcash Eli Ben-Sasson označil cenu 2 000 USD za ZEC za samozřejmou a v dlouhodobém horizontu očekává 5 000 USD. ZEC za 24 hodin klesl o 10,23 % na 1 098 USD.
Zcash cofounder Eli Ben-Sasson renewed his optimistic outlook for the ZEC token, suggesting in a recent X post that a $2,000 price target is a “no-brainer” and projecting a potential climb to $5,000 over the long term. Ben-Sasson’s remarks addressed possible scenarios for ZEC in 2026.
Zcash recent price actionZcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency designed to provide anonymous transactions, surged to $1,696 on September 26, reaching its highest point in months after a sustained rally. However, the price has since lost momentum. As of the latest data, ZEC traded at $1,098, reflecting a decline of 10.23% over the past 24 hours. The broader crypto market experienced widespread selling following new inflation data that spurred concerns about potential Federal Reserve interest rate hikes this month.
To reach Ben-Sasson’s $2,000 target, ZEC would need to increase by more than 82% from its current price. The path forward may prove challenging if current market headwinds persist.
Technical levels and market sentimentThe recent pullback pushed Zcash below its daily MA 50, a moving average that had previously supported price increases during August 2026. Regaining this technical level could encourage bullish traders to drive the price higher and test resistance in the $1,300 to $1,400 range, with further upside toward $1,700 and potentially $2,000 if momentum continues.
Zcash needs to reclaim key technical support before bulls can attempt a rally toward $1,700 and $2,000.
Santiment analytics reported that ZEC gained approximately 48% between September 15 and September 26, 2026. However, by October 14, the token had lost nearly all those gains.
During this period, open interest in ZEC peaked at 1.60 million coins. By October 14, open interest had fallen by 2.5% compared to mid-September. Social volume also dropped significantly, with a high of 671 ZEC mentions during the rally, falling to just 50 on October 14, marking the quietest day since September 2. Despite the declining attention and reduced leverage, ZEC rose past $1,650 during the rally.
DateZEC PriceOpen InterestSocial MentionsSep 15, 2026~$1,1461.60 million ZEC–Sep 26, 2026$1,696 (peak)–671Oct 14, 2026~$1,0982.5% below Sep 1550 (quietest since Sep 2)Upgrade and market outlookA mainnet decision on the Zcash NU7 upgrade is expected on October 20, 2026. Despite this upcoming event, social dominance statistics for ZEC are at their lowest since early September, indicating subdued interest from the online community.
Eli Ben-Sasson’s bullish forecast keeps a spotlight on ZEC, though the market awaits further catalyst events and technical confirmation to support a renewed rally.
Mini dictionary: NU7 upgrade, the next major protocol update for Zcash, aims to implement technical improvements to enhance privacy, efficiency, and network functionality. Each upgrade on the Zcash network is designated “Network Upgrade” followed by a sequential number. NU7 is scheduled for a mainnet activation decision in October 2026.
Online metrics show declining social buzz around Zcash, even during rapid price movement, as open interest also recedes since last month’s peak.
ZEC klesl z maxima 1 650 USD dosaženého 26. září na zhruba 1 145 USD k 14. říjnu, tedy o přibližně 30 %. O spuštění upgradu NU7 na mainnetu se rozhodne 20. října.
Zcash price prediction just got trickier. ZEC surged roughly 48% between September 15 and September 26, then surrendered nearly all those gains by October 14. Now, with the NU7 upgrade’s mainnet decision scheduled for October 20, attention has faded just as the next catalyst approaches.
ZEC’s Rally Lost Steam After SeptemberZEC’s daily closing price peaked at $1,650 on September 26. By October 14, it had fallen around 30% from that high, closing at $1,145 only about 3% above its September 15 starting point.
That’s a dramatic round trip. The rally looked impressive on the way up, but the latest figures show how little of that move remained. Anyone treating the September surge as a durable breakout has a tougher chart to defend now.
Open Interest and Social Buzz Peaked Earlier$ZEC ran about 48% from Sep 15 to Sep 26 and had handed back nearly all of it by Oct 14. Santiment data shows open interest in coins peaked first on Sep 17, then social volume on Sep 18, and finally the daily price close on Sep 26. The $1,145 close on Oct 14 sat about 3% above… pic.twitter.com/Ub3oxmfBRv
— Santiment Intelligence (@SantimentData) October 15, 2026 Santiment data shows open interest in coins peaked first, reaching 1.60 million ZEC on September 17. Social volume followed on September 18, topping out at 671 mentions. Price didn’t reach its closing high until September 26.
In other words, leverage and online attention peaked before the market did. ZEC continued climbing even as both measures had moved past their highs. By October 14, open interest was 2.5% below its September 15 level, while social volume had dropped to just 50 mentions, the quietest reading since September 2.
NU7 Decision Arrives as Attention FadesThe upcoming Zcash NU7 mainnet decision is now the next date to watch. It lands on October 20, with social volume at its lowest point since early September.
That doesn’t automatically mean a rebound is coming. Nor does weak attention prove another decline is inevitable. The immediate question is whether the upgrade decision changes market interest after ZEC gave back almost the entire rally.
For now, the Zcash price prediction hinges on whether the NU7 decision can revive attention and price momentum or whether September’s surge remains a short-lived move that failed to hold.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Zcash Names spustil předběžný přístup k názvům pro stíněné platby, které nahrazují dlouhé adresy uživatelskými jmény a zachovávají soukromí odesílatele, příjemce i převáděné částky.
People can send shielded Zcash using names such as alice instead of copying long addresses or scanning QR codes, bringing private peer-to-peer payments closer to the experience of payment apps.
HOUSTON, Oct. 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Zcash Names opens Early Access today, giving people who reserved names the first opportunity to register them and use names such as alice instead of long Zcash addresses.
A Zcash name makes sending private digital money more like sending money to a username in a payment app. A sender can enter a name in their Zcash wallet instead of copying a long address or scanning a QR code.
Payments use Zcash's shielded system, allowing the name to be shared publicly while keeping the sender, receiver, and amount hidden from public view on the blockchain.
Zcash Names is intended to close one of the usability gaps between cryptocurrency and payment apps while allowing peer-to-peer payments without a financial intermediary.
Fourteen wallets, explorers, and other apps, including Cake, Edge, Noir, and Zingo, integrated Zcash Names during earlier beta releases. A name can be used across participating apps rather than being tied to one wallet. An SDK is available to support integrations, and an explorer lets people resolve names to addresses and view the history of a name.
Early Access and Registration
Early Access begins October 15, 2026, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern for people who reserved a name.
Reservations cost 0.005 ZEC and provide access to the registration queue. Reservations can be made until the queue closes.
Yearly registration starts at $20 for names of six characters or longer and increases for shorter names, up to $10,000 a year for a single-character name. Permanent registration costs three times the yearly price.
Open registration begins on October 30 or after all reserved participants have had an opportunity to register, whichever comes later.
As of publication, 10,802 names had been added to the waitlist since April. Of those, 973 had paid reservations since August 18.
Another 1,564 names are protected from public registration to reduce impersonation and name squatting. That group includes prominent names already registered through the Ethereum Name Service (ENS).
How Zcash Names Works
Zcash does not support general-purpose smart contracts, so Zcash Names uses Zcash transactions to record who controls a name.
When the Zcash Names registrar accepts a registration or update, it records the name's current state on Zcash, including its associated address, expiration, and a link to the previous state. Wallets use those records to determine who currently controls the name.
The name, the address it resolves to, and the history of registrations, updates, and releases are public. Payments made to a shielded Zcash address can remain shielded.
The registrar processes claims inside a trusted execution environment, a protected computing environment that restricts access to the software and data used in that process.
A Zcash-native naming system was also discussed at TOKEN2049 Singapore 2026. During "The Zcash Moment" on the OKX Main Stage on October 7, Balaji Srinivasan, founder of The Network State, said, “The next step will eventually be something like ZNS, which has all those good properties, but then has various levels of selective revelation with viewing keys." Video of the remarks is available at https://x.com/ZcashNames/status/2107811296129515548.
Logos, current waitlist figures, and more information about the design are available at https://www.zcashnames.com/press.
About Zcash Names
Zcash Names is a naming protocol for shielded Zcash addresses. It lets people use human-readable names in place of long addresses when sending Zcash through supported wallets and apps.
It succeeds ZECpages, the directory James Joseph started in 2020, and draws on ZcashMe, which lets users prove control of a Zcash address, something Zcash does not support natively. In 2026, the naming system moved on-chain.
The protocol is developed by James Joseph, Julian Abraham, and Lana Ivina. Zcash Community Grants has funded development of Zcash Names and a Zcash program at Network School.
For more information, visit: zcashnames.com
Media Contact
James Joseph, CEO/Founder
ZcashMe, Inc.
[email protected]
Disclaimer: This sponsored content is provided by the content provider and does not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. The information is shared for general informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency and mining-related activities carry risks, including the potential loss of capital, and readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and seek professional advice where appropriate. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose.The media platform and publisher assume no responsibility for any losses or claims arising from reliance on this content. GlobeNewswire does not endorse any content on this page.
Legal Disclaimer: This article is provided on an “as-is” basis, without warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. The media platform assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented. Any complaints, claims, or copyright concerns related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fc3afd2a-0899-4e51-8398-6f332ccfd0c0
Interactive Brokers vykázala za čtvrtletí zisk na akcii (EPS) ve výši 0,67 USD, v souladu s očekáváním, a tržby ve výši 1,87 miliardy USD, tedy o 1,86 % nad konsensem.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.67 per share, in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate . This compares to earnings of $0.57 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post earnings of $0.64 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.69, delivering a surprise of +7.81%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times.
Interactive Brokers, which belongs to the Zacks Financial - Investment Bank industry, posted revenues of $1.87 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.86%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.61 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Interactive Brokers shares have added about 30.8% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.8%.
What's Next for Interactive Brokers?While Interactive Brokers has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Interactive Brokers was favorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to outperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $0.71 on $1.94 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $2.70 on $7.34 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Financial - Investment Bank is currently in the top 31% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
Tradeweb Markets (TW - Free Report) , another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on October 29.
This electronic marketplaces operator is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.01 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +16.1%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 0.6% lower over the last 30 days to the current level.
Tradeweb Markets' revenues are expected to be $573.9 million, up 12.8% from the year-ago quarter.
Aave V4 now lets users on Circle’s Arc network borrow dollars against euros without selling the euros first.
The feature lives in a dedicated Forex spoke, where EURC can be posted as collateral to borrow USDC.
How the Forex spoke works Aave V4 went live on Arc around September 16, 2026. It launched with a lineup of assets that includes USDC, EURC, cirBTC, and WETH.
The protocol uses a hub-and-spoke design. On Arc, the hub is called the Core Liquidity Hub. The Forex spoke draws liquidity from that hub, so euro holders can tap the same pool of dollars everyone else uses.
The key detail is risk separation. In the Main spoke, EURC has a 0% collateral factor. Euro deposits there carry no borrowing power at all.
The Forex spoke is where EURC becomes useful collateral. A user who holds euro stablecoins can borrow USDC against them and keep their euro exposure intact.
Isolating this activity in its own spoke means any trouble with EURC collateral stays contained. The Main spoke does not inherit the currency risk.
The numbers so far Data from Aave Tracker and Aavescan as of October 15, 2026, paints a picture of a deep hub and a quiet new route.
The Arc Core hub held approximately $294 million in supplied liquidity. Around $143 million of that was USDC. Borrowing in the Core hub stood at roughly $110 million.
The Forex spoke had about $68,000 supplied and about $32,000 borrowed.
The base borrow rate for the euro stablecoin is around 0.44%.
EURC is capped at 10M in the Forex spoke, a conservative limit set because secondary liquidity for the asset is limited. If liquidations ever need to happen, thin secondary markets can make unwinding positions harder, so a smaller ceiling limits the potential damage.
Why Arc, and why now Arc is Circle’s own network, and Circle issues both USDC and EURC.
The network also comes with an unusual roster of validators. BlackRock, Visa, and Mastercard are among the institutional validators securing Arc.
Aave V4 itself targets stablecoin-native and institutional use cases.
What this means For Aave, the Forex spoke is as much a test of the V4 design as it is a product launch. The hub-and-spoke model is built to let the protocol add specialized markets without exposing the whole system to each new risk.
With roughly $294 million sitting in the Core hub and only about $68,000 supplied in the Forex spoke, there is plenty of room to grow.
The 10M EURC cap is the number to watch. If supply in the Forex spoke starts approaching it, governance will face a decision about whether secondary liquidity has deepened enough to raise the limit.
A base rate around 0.44% for EURC reflects light demand, and any meaningful jump would suggest real usage is picking up.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
IonQ po akvizici společnosti Oxford Ionics dosáhla rekordní hodnoty přesnosti dvouqubitových bran 99,99 % a buduje integrovaný ekosystém kvantových technologií.
IonQ (IONQ +9.32%) CEO Niccolo de Masi has stated that he wants his company to become the Nvidia (NVDA -1.84%) of quantum computing. This means he wants IonQ not just to develop a fault-tolerant quantum computer but to control the entire quantum ecosystem.
While Nvidia is best known for its powerful graphics processing units (GPUs) that are the primary chips used to run artificial intelligence (AI) workloads, the company's dominance stems from its ecosystem. Its CUDA software platform is where most original AI code was written and remains an important moat today. Meanwhile, the development of the company's NVLink interconnect system, which enables multiple GPUs to operate as a single, massive unit, has further widened its moat.
Nvidia also hasn't been afraid to make important acquisitions and incorporate acquired companies' technology into its ecosystem. It did this with Mellanox and networking in 2020, which is one of its fastest-growing businesses today and helps provide the foundation for its complete end-to-end AI factories. Nvidia also smartly "acquired" Groq and its language processing units (LPUs) to boost its inference offering, while scooping up critical AI software layers through additions like SchedMD and Hugging Face.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
IonQ: An aggressive acquirer IonQ has taken a page out of Nvidia's playbook and been very aggressive in making acquisitions across the quantum ecosystem. One of its most important acquisitions was Oxford Ionics in 2025. IonQ was able to incorporate Oxford's Electronic Qubit Control (EQC) technology, which embeds microwave antennas directly into chips, into its own technology. This helped it achieve a record 99.99% two-qubit gate fidelity, while significantly reducing its reliance on complex, bulky control laser arrays to manipulate its trapped ions.
EQC could be one of the key technologies that helps IonQ eventually develop a fault-tolerant quantum computer that can be commercialized. In addition to helping IonQ achieve an industry-leading low error rate, it also provides the company with quantum chips that can be manufactured by traditional foundries. Relying on chips that needed manual laser alignments and custom optical tables would likely never scale.
$34.35+$2.93 (+9.32%)
NYSE · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
However, this technology alone isn't enough; IonQ also needs to connect these EQC chips. This is where its quantum networking acquisitions of Lightsynq and Qubitekk come in. With Qubitekk, it received a robust quantum networking patent portfolio and the hardware needed to build distributed quantum systems and secure optical networks. Lightsynq, meanwhile, gave IonQ high-bandwidth photonic interconnects capable of connecting multiple quantum chips.
IonQ has even taken it a step further than Nvidia by becoming vertically integrated through its acquisition of quantum foundry SkyWater earlier this year. By having its own foundry, IonQ should be able to advance its technology roadmap more quickly and eventually allow it to scale more rapidly. While I wouldn't recommend the average chip company running a foundry business, it has clear advantages for emerging technologies with things like rapid prototyping.
Meanwhile, IonQ's most recently announced acquisition of Elisity pushes it further into the security market. This isn't the company's first acquisition in the space, though. Last year, it acquired ID Quantique, which brought it Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Quantum Random Number Generation (QRNG), and single-photon detectors that are part of a quantum cryptography system designed to protect optical networks from hacking by quantum computers. Elisity, in turn, will give IonQ an enterprise zero-trust technology solution.
By combining the two technologies, IonQ will be able to offer an end-to-end security platform that protects enterprise networks against both current threats and future quantum decryption risks. Given how AI has changed the cybersecurity landscape, putting in place a platform that can guard against future quantum attacks is actually quite ingenious.
In addition to these deals, IonQ has also acquired companies in the areas of quantum sensing, transmission, and software orchestration. It truly is developing a complete quantum ecosystem, which potentially positions it to become the quantum computing leader in the future, much like Nvidia did in the AI space.
With the quantum computing stock down around 60% from its highs, now looks like a good opportunity to bet on this high-risk, high-reward stock that could eventually control the entire quantum ecosystem.
IonQ (IONQ +9.32%) has had a bad 2026. The stock is down by about 20% this year and is off by more than 60% from the all-time high above $84 that it reached at this time last year. However, I think it could be preparing for a rebound, and might blow right past that high next year on its way to $100 per share.
From its current level of less than $40 per share, that would be a rise of more than 150%, which is why I think it is one of the highest-potential stocks in the market now.
Image source: Getty Images.
IonQ has a major catalyst arriving in 2027
We're closer to commercially viable fault-tolerant quantum computing than we've ever been before. While many companies in this industry have been forecasting that viable quantum computing will arrive in 2030, several leaders in the space now see the timeline shortening to 2029, including IonQ. This is a big deal, as the first competitors to deliver on their goals will start to emerge in the near future.
I think IonQ will be one of those, as it has taken the lead with an unusual technology. Instead of using the more common superconducting qubit approach, IonQ is using trapped-ion qubit technology, which yields more accurate results at the cost of slower processing speeds. One of the primary reasons quantum computing isn't ready for widespread commercial use yet is that qubits are incredibly sensitive to outside interference, and as a result, calculations performed on quantum computers frequently yield incorrect results. Reducing their error frequency and developing better error-correction tools are among the central challenges that companies in the space are working on today.
So it makes sense that the companies developing quantum computers that lead in accuracy will see their systems adopted first, which is why I think IonQ has a strong chance of succeeding. In fact, IonQ holds the world record for quantum computing accuracy, with two-qubit gate fidelity of 99.99%.
$34.35+$2.93 (+9.32%)
NYSE · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
Another hurdle that stands between quantum computing and commercial viability is linking enough qubits together in one system to form a stable and accurate computing device with enough processing power to be useful. IonQ expects to start delivering its new 256-qubit system, the Superion 256, early next year, and there are already several preorders for it. If this device delivers on expectations, it could kick off a race by businesses to acquire early-stage quantum computers.
Right now, Wall Street analysts are bullish about IonQ's outlook for next year: The average projection is that its revenue will grow nearly 80%. If the launch is successful, it could blow past that forecast growth rate, which could help lift the stock to new heights.
We'll know a lot more about IonQ's success by this time next year. However, I think its future looks bright enough to warrant taking a small position in the stock and getting portfolio exposure to one of the best quantum computing companies out there.
Independent Bank Corp. ve čtvrtletí končícím v září 2026 vykázala upravený zisk 1,90 USD na akcii a výnosy ve výši 261,95 milionu USD, čímž překonala odhady.
Independent Bank Corp. (INDB - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $1.9 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.84 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.55 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +3.26%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this holding company for Rockland Trust would post earnings of $1.77 per share when it actually produced earnings of $1.7, delivering a surprise of -3.95%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times.
Independent Bank Corp., which belongs to the Zacks Banks - Northeast industry, posted revenues of $261.95 million for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.27%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $243.74 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
Independent Bank Corp. shares have added about 4.1% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.8%.
What's Next for Independent Bank Corp.?While Independent Bank Corp. has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Independent Bank Corp. was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $1.95 on $263.1 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $7.17 on $1.03 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Banks - Northeast is currently in the top 29% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
Chain Bridge Bancorp, Inc. (CBNA - Free Report) , another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026.
This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.71 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +137.5%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 5% higher over the last 30 days to the current level.
Chain Bridge Bancorp, Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $22.38 million, up 70.6% from the year-ago quarter.
Proti společnosti Chemours (CC) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným zavádějícím výhledům; poté, co snížila celoroční výhled upravené EBITDA, její akcie 5. srpna 2026 klesly o 18,63 %.
Did you buy CC securities between February 20, 2026 and August 4, 2026?
Affected CC Investor Summary
Who: The Chemours Company (NYSE: CC)What: Securities fraud class action lawsuit filedClass Period: February 20, 2026 through August 4, 2026Deadline to Seek Lead Plaintiff Status: December 7, 2026Key Lawsuit Allegations: Material misstatements and/or omissions concerning the reliability of the company’s financial guidanceInvestor Action: Contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) for recovery options RADNOR, Pa., Oct. 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com), a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, informs investors that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against The Chemours Company (“Chemours”) (NYSE: CC) on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Chemours securities between February 20, 2026 and August 4, 2026, inclusive. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and is captioned Darcy v. The Chemours Company, No. 1:26-cv-01299 (D. Del.). Investors have until December 7, 2026, to file for lead plaintiff status.
CONTACT KTMC TO DISCUSS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS:
If you purchased or acquired Chemours securities and have lost money on your investment, please provide your information here: https://www.ktmc.com/cc-the-chemours-company-class-action-lawsuit?utm_source=Globe&utm_medium=pressrelease&utm_campaign=cc&mktm=PR
You can also contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. by calling (484) 270-1453 or by email at [email protected]. There is no cost or obligation to speak with an attorney.
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT - COMPLAINT ALLEGATION SUMMARY:
Chemours is an American chemical company that offers a range of industrial and specialty chemical products for markets including, but not limited to, refrigeration and air conditioning. Chemours’s Thermal & Specialized Solutions (“TSS”) segment sells its product OpteonTM, a set of refrigeration chemicals with a “near-zero ozone-depletion footprint.”
The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material facts about the company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Defendants had materially overstated aftermarket demand for their Opteon products; (2) demand for such products was decreasing as a result of Defendants’ overselling Opteon products in the preceding fiscal year; (3) as a result of these undisclosed issues, Defendants’ financial guidance for the 2026 fiscal year was unreliable; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ statements about the company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
WHY DID CHEMOURS’S STOCK DROP?
After the market closed on August 4, 2026, Chemours announced its second quarter 2026 financial results, revealing, among other things, that the company reduced its adjusted EBITDA full year guidance to $775 million to $825 million, down from $800 million to $900 million previously. The company attributed this, and its year-over-year net sales decrease of approximately 1%, to a “4% decrease in volumes.” Specifically, it stated that “[t]he volume decline was primarily driven by lower TSS Opteon™ blends aftermarket refrigerant sales.”
On this news, the price of Chemours stock fell $3.34 per share, or 18.63%, to close at $14.59 per share on August 5, 2026.
WHAT THE CHEMOURS COMPANY INVESTORS CAN DO NOW:
File to be lead plaintiff by December 7, 2026.Contact KTMC for a free case evaluation. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you.Retain counsel of choice or take no action. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS FOR THE CHEMOURS COMPANY INVESTORS:
Chemours investors may, no later than December 7, 2026, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or other counsel, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff is usually the investor or small group of investors who have the largest financial interest and who are also adequate and typical of the proposed class of investors. The lead plaintiff selects counsel to represent the lead plaintiff and the class and these attorneys, if approved by the court, are lead or class counsel. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP encourages Chemours investors to contact the firm for more information.
ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP (KTMC):
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (KTMC) is a leading U.S. plaintiff-side law firm focused on securities-fraud class actions and global investor protection. The firm represents individual investors as well as institutions, such as major pension funds, asset managers, and international investors. KTMC has led some of the largest recoveries in securities litigation and has been recognized by peers and the legal media with numerous accolades, including being recognized in Chambers & Partners USA 2026 as a Band 1 Top Firm in Securities and Class Actions, Legal 500’s Tier 1 Rankings for Securities and M&A Litigation, The National Law Journal’s Plaintiff’s Hot List and Trailblazers in Plaintiffs' Law, BTI Consulting Group’s Honor Roll of Most Feared Law Firms, The Legal Intelligencer’s Class Action Firm of the Year, Lawdragon’s Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers, and Law360’s Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar. The firm operates globally with offices in Pennsylvania and California. KTMC has recovered over $25 billion for our clients and the classes they represent. The complaint in this matter was not filed by KTMC.
CONTACT:
Jonathan Naji, Esq.
(484) 270-1453
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087 [email protected]
May be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Alcoa ve čtvrtletí končícím v září 2026 zvýšila tržby o 23,7 % na 3,7 mld. USD a dosáhla zisku na akcii 1,82 USD oproti ztrátě 0,02 USD na akcii před rokem.
Alcoa (AA - Free Report) reported $3.7 billion in revenue for the quarter ended September 2026, representing a year-over-year increase of 23.7%. EPS of $1.82 for the same period compares to -$0.02 a year ago.
The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.61 billion, representing a surprise of +2.49%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +10.3%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $1.65.
While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.
Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.
Here is how Alcoa performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:
Bauxite production in Tons: 9.30 Mmt versus the two-analyst average estimate of 9.15 Mmt.Alumina production in Tons: 2,467.00 Kmt versus 2,443.54 Kmt estimated by two analysts on average.Aluminum production in Tons: 649.00 Kmt versus the two-analyst average estimate of 629.01 Kmt.Third-party bauxite shipments in Tons: 1,500.00 Mmt versus 1,641.96 Mmt estimated by two analysts on average.Intersegment Alumina Shipments: 1,314.00 Kmt versus 1,180.88 Kmt estimated by two analysts on average.Total aluminum shipments in Tons: 693 thousand compared to the 687.56 thousand average estimate based on two analysts.Total Third-party sales- Alumina (including Bauxite): $680 million versus $695.18 million estimated by two analysts on average.Third-party sales- Bauxite: $85 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $95.8 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -24.8%.Intersegment sales- Aluminum: $5 million compared to the $4.5 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of 0% year over year.Third-party sales- Aluminum: $3.02 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $3.16 billion. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +48.1%.Intersegment sales- Alumina: $542 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $443.88 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +14.4%.Third-party sales- Alumina: $595 million versus $599.38 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -29.3% change.View all Key Company Metrics for Alcoa here>>>
Shares of Alcoa have returned -13.4% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1.4% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
Uniswap, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) platform, is seeing a notable rise in stablecoin trading activity. According to the RWA Foundation, Uniswap recorded $91.1 million in stablecoin trading volume over the last 24 hours, positioning itself at the forefront of stablecoin-driven DEX growth within that period.
Surge in Stablecoin Volume on UniswapThe fresh trading data highlights Uniswap’s central role in decentralized finance as traders rely increasingly on stablecoin pools for seamless swaps between cryptocurrencies and dollar-pegged assets. As liquidity providers and traders seek to minimize volatility, stablecoins continue to serve as a backbone for DEX operations.
The reported increase in volume reflects strong participation but does not automatically signal a parallel rise in protocol revenue or in demand for Uniswap’s native token, UNI. Analysts suggest that a full evaluation of the trend requires monitoring trading activity beyond the 24-hour window to establish whether it marks a sustained shift or just a temporary surge.
Uniswap’s platform, which allows permissionless trading of ERC-20 assets, has become a key venue for stablecoin liquidity. This dynamic is particularly notable amid increased liquidity competition among DEXs and rising demand for efficient swaps.
Mini dictionary: RWA Foundation, a research group focused on real-world assets and decentralized finance analytics.
While stablecoin volumes are climbing, the relationship between this trend and UNI price performance remains indirect. Trading metrics such as spot volume, open interest, and funding rate from derivatives trading are also used by market participants to gauge UNI’s prospects.
UNI Price Action Near $6.89 Sparks Technical DebateTechnical analysis by Crypto With Gopal, a cryptocurrency market analyst, points to a triangle breakout pattern in UNI following a period of price consolidation. The token recently broke past descending resistance, briefly retracing to the $6.89 level—an area seen as pivotal by traders watching for signs of sustained bullish momentum.
Should buyers manage to defend the $6.89 mark and push UNI back towards resistance, the conditions for a further breakout could strengthen, giving the token solid ground for the next major move upward.
However, technical signals can be inconclusive without additional confirmation. A confirmed breakout typically requires not only a price move above resistance but also increased trading volume and sustained buying pressure. Falling below support at $6.89 would counter the bullish scenario and weaken the technical outlook.
The $8 to $9 range now serves as the immediate resistance zone. Clearing this level would improve odds of a move toward analyst-proposed targets in the $14 to $15 range. Failure to hold above former resistance could lead to renewed downside risk for the token.
LevelStatusSignificance$6.89SupportKey breakout zone to hold for bullish setup$8 – $9ResistanceImmediate upside hurdle; breakout could open way to higher targets$14 – $15TargetUpper target proposed by analystOutlook: Technical Tests and Market ParticipationIn the short term, UNI’s setup depends on whether it can remain above $6.89 and move toward $8–$9. A successful defense and recovery would back analyst opinions suggesting a potential bullish trend. If the bullish pattern fails and the token drops below support, the technical case for immediate recovery would weaken.
Broader ecosystem activity, as reflected in stablecoin trading volumes, represents positive engagement for Uniswap but is not in itself a sign of guaranteed price appreciation for UNI. Protocol stakeholders continue to track technical signals and real trading data for clues about near-term direction.
Continued support at $6.89, resistance breakthroughs, and ongoing stablecoin volume will remain key technical factors shaping UNI’s momentum in the current environment.
Avalanche (AVAX) chain fees have climbed from $1,066 on July 30 to a peak of $64,010 on September 24. Here is what is driving the rise and what it means for AVAX.
Avalanche chain revenue has risen sharply since late summer. Daily fees generated by @avax were as low as $1,066 on July 30 and have grown steadily since. The daily figure now sits closer to $10,000 to $20,000, and it reached as high as $64,010 on September 24.
The jump raises a familiar question for $AVAX holders: is a broader recovery in the token finally taking shape?
What is behind the rise in Avalanche feesSeveral factors appear to be feeding into higher on-chain activity. Cryptonomist reported in early September that fees on the Avalanche decentralised exchange Pharaoh CL had jumped more than 1,150% over 30 days, pointing to a pickup in DeFi trading.
Real-world asset (RWA) tokenisation is another theme. According to Crypto Briefing, citing The Defiant, AVAX rose 49.7% over four weeks, outpacing Bitcoin and Ether. The report attributed the move to the Helicon upgrade and $266 million in RWA growth on the network.
Current data is broadly consistent with the fee levels described above. CoinGecko shows Avalanche recorded $10,238 in fees over the past 24 hours. Tron Weekly, citing Chainspect, said the network generated $97,348 in revenue over seven days, the first time it crossed the $95,000 weekly mark.
Is AVAX season finally here?The price has responded, but context matters. CryptoTicker reported AVAX at around $11.09 on October 12, up 7.2% on the day, while Bitcoin, Ether, Solana and XRP were all lower over the week.
Even so, the token remains far below its past highs. AOL noted that on October 10, AVAX traded about 93% below its peak of $144.96. The same piece cautioned that the only mechanical link between institutional fund activity and coin price is transaction fees, which are small relative to billion-dollar market caps.
The scale of revenue is also modest. At $432,400 over 30 days, annualised network earnings would be about $5.2 million, according to Coingabbar, citing Chainspect data. That is small against a market capitalisation of roughly $4.6 billion.
Fee growth from a very low base is a positive sign for usage, but it does not on its own confirm a lasting trend for the token. Traders will be watching whether revenue holds at current levels and whether AVAX can clear resistance near $11.60.
Sources:
Crypto Briefing: Avalanche's AVAX gains 50% in four weeks
Tron Weekly: Avalanche network activity and AVAX price outlook
CoinGecko: Avalanche price and fee data
DeFi Development Corp. zvýšila roční sazbu dividendy u prioritních akcií CHAD z 13 % na 14 %, což při jmenovité hodnotě 10 USD představuje 1,40 USD na akcii.
DeFi Development Corp. just made its preferred stock a little more generous. The Nasdaq-listed Solana treasury company is raising the annual dividend rate on its CHAD preferred shares from 13.00% to 14.00%.
What changed for CHAD holders DeFi Development Corp. (Nasdaq: DFDV) announced the increase on October 15, 2026. The new rate applies to its Variable Rate Series C Perpetual Preferred Stock, which trades under the ticker CHAD.
The higher payout kicks in starting November 2, 2026. Based on the $10.00 stated amount per share, annual dividend income rises to $1.40 per share from $1.30.
The math looks even better for early buyers. CHAD’s initial offering priced at $8.00 per share on September 3, 2026, raising approximately $11 million in gross proceeds. Anyone who bought at that price and still holds is now collecting $1.40 a year on an $8.00 outlay, or 17.5% on cost.
The dividends are cumulative, which means any skipped payments pile up and remain owed to shareholders. Payments are made daily when declared by the board.
The board has also authorized a repurchase program for CHAD shares, with a focus on achieving a $10 par value.
How CHAD fits the Solana treasury playbook CHAD is a perpetual, non-convertible preferred stock. Perpetual means there is no maturity date. Non-convertible means holders cannot swap their shares into common stock, so the dividend is the whole point. The instrument is backed by DeFi Development’s SOL treasury, which the company aims to put to work through strategies including staking.
As of mid-October 2026, the company’s holdings reached approximately 2.586 million SOL and equivalents.
CEO Joseph Onorati framed the higher rate as a way to make CHAD more attractive as an income-generating investment. The strategy ties directly to the treasury: proceeds from future CHAD sales are expected to fund further SOL accumulation.
DeFi Development plans to execute as much as $300 million in additional CHAD share issuances. For context, that would be roughly 27 times the gross proceeds from the September debut.
The pitch to common shareholders is SOL-per-share growth. If preferred investors fund new SOL purchases, common holders own a slice of a bigger treasury without the company issuing more common stock to pay for it.
From real estate to digital credit DeFi Development did not start life as a crypto treasury. The company pivoted from a prior real estate platform to a strategy built around holding Solana.
The variable rate structure allows the board to raise or change the payout as conditions shift. This latest move is the first visible use of that lever.
What this means for investors and the treasury model Because the dividends are cumulative, the obligation does not vanish in a bad quarter. The treasury backing CHAD is denominated in a crypto asset that can swing sharply. A falling SOL price would shrink the asset base while the dividend obligation stays fixed in dollar terms. Preferred holders sit ahead of common shareholders, but they are still exposed to the health of the treasury.
For common shareholders, the question is whether the cost of the preferred funding is worth the SOL it buys. If staking yields and SOL appreciation outpace a 14% dividend over time, the structure grows SOL per share.
The things to track from here are straightforward. Watch where CHAD trades relative to its $10.00 stated amount, how quickly the company taps its issuance capacity, and whether the SOL treasury keeps growing beyond 2.586 million.
Disclosure: This article was edited by John Chen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Solana ve 3. čtvrtletí 2026 zaznamenala rekordní objem tokenizovaných akcií ve výši více než 7,1 miliardy USD. Počet peněženek jejich držitelů překročil 1,2 milionu.
Solana logo, official brand asset from solana.com/branding. Alpenglow is a Solana consensus upgrade.
Solana has achieved a significant milestone, recording its highest ever quarterly volume in tokenized equities, exceeding $7.1 billion in the third quarter of 2026. This development, reported by @SolanaFloor, underscores the platform’s growing influence in the tokenized stock market. The network’s on-chain equities activity reached a record, with official data from September showing about $4.4 billion in volume. Solana’s ecosystem, which includes platforms like Raydium and xStocks, continues to attract a large number of participants, with holder wallets surpassing 1.2 million. The increase in activity is reflective of Solana’s substantial share of the cross-chain tokenized equity market.
Key Takeaways The record Q3 volume on Solana appears consistent with growing interest and confidence in the platform’s tokenized equities market. Market pricing suggests a potential positive impact on Solana’s value, as participants may view the milestone as supportive of price increases. The large volume of tokenized equity activity indicates robust network engagement, suggesting continued growth on Solana. What to Watch Observers will be keen to see if Solana’s increased tokenized equities volume translates into a rise in its native token’s market value. Key developments such as regulatory changes, further ETF approvals, or major partnerships could influence market sentiment and pricing. Additionally, any changes in decentralized exchange volumes or new wallet integrations would likely impact Solana’s market position and perceived value. Market participants will be watching for any indicators that could suggest further upward momentum for Solana’s price in the coming weeks.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h November 1 2026 0.7% 0.0¢ $1K View market → November 1 2026 6.3% +0.7¢ $2K View market → November 1 2026 20% -1¢ $4K View market → November 1 2026 8.8% -0.1¢ $86 View market → November 1 2026 0.4% 0.0¢ $7K View market → November 1 2026 1.2% -0.5¢ $4K View market → November 1 2026 1.9% -0.1¢ — View market → November 1 2026 2.1% -0.1¢ $1K View market → November 1 2026 2.1% -0.7¢ $4K View market → November 1 2026 0.1% 0.0¢ $3K View market → November 1 2026 0.1% 0.0¢ $3K View market → November 1 2026 10% -2.5¢ $2K View market → November 1 2026 0.4% 0.0¢ $3K View market → November 1 2026 2.9% +0.1¢ $8K View market → Updated 6min ago
Spout, a Solana-based protocol that lets investors borrow against tokenized US stocks without paying interest, has raised a $2 million strategic round with backing from Draper Dragon, Anchorage Digital, Flow Traders and Solana Labs, among others. We spoke to Marc Ryan, Spout’s co-founder and CEO, about the two-tier credit system he saw in investment banking, how the protocol pays lenders without charging borrowers, and what has to happen before its private beta opens.
You started your career in investment banking. What did you see there that eventually led to Spout?
I worked at HSBC, including on the Arm IPO. What struck me was a two-tier credit system sitting in plain sight.
On one side of the building, we arranged debt for large companies at rates a retail investor would assume were a typo. On the other, an individual holding a perfectly good portfolio of those same companies’ stock pays around 12% to borrow against it. Same underlying asset, same credit logic, completely different price. The only variable is who you are.
The second thing was how much of the work was simply moving information around. Underwriting is largely the business of assembling facts that already exist, verifying them slowly and charging for the delay. A lot of that collapses if the asset and the information about it sit on the same ledger, and anyone can check both instantly.
Spout came out of holding those two observations side by side.
Margin loans have been around for as long as brokerages have. Why has borrowing against stocks stayed so expensive for individual investors?
Because nobody has had a way to attack it.
Margin interest is not a cost being passed through to you. It is a product. The brokerage borrows cheaply, lends to you at a spread and keeps the difference. That spread is one of the most reliable revenue lines in the business, and no competitor can undercut it without giving up the same revenue themselves. It is also not a number most people shop on. You compare commissions and app design, and you discover the margin rate after you have already moved your account.
So the rate does not fall, because falling requires replacing that income with something else, and there was no something else.
Prime brokerage solves exactly this problem for institutions. It generates revenue from the collateral itself rather than from the borrower, which is why a hedge fund’s financing costs look nothing like yours. Running that at individual scale needs a shared ledger and programmable custody, and until recently neither existed.
That is the real unlock, and it is not tokenization for its own sake. It is the ability to produce income from the collateral, so that you no longer have to produce it from the borrower.
If the borrower pays no interest, where does the lender’s return come from, and what makes it go up or down?
It comes from selling optionality on the collateral, not from the borrower.
When you post stock with us, it would otherwise sit there doing nothing, exactly as it does in a brokerage account. We write covered calls against it, far out of the money, on a weekly cycle. The premium from those calls is what pays the lender. The borrower keeps the stock’s downside and its upside up to the strike, and pays no interest.
The lender has no directional exposure to the stock. They own a stream of option premium, which is why the return is largely indifferent to whether the market goes up or down.
What moves it is the gap between implied and realized volatility. Options on large, liquid US stocks persistently price in more movement than actually occurs. That gap is where the premium comes from, and it exists because of structural demand, not because anyone is making a mistake. Pension funds and institutional allocators buy protection on blue chip holdings as a matter of policy, not because they have a view. Retail investors buy upside calls on a handful of names with enormous enthusiasm. Both are price-insensitive buyers, and someone has to be on the other side of them. When that gap is wide, the lender earns more. When it compresses, the lender earns less. The lender side is split into a senior and a junior tranche.
Selling volatility on blue chip stocks isn’t a new idea. What is different about the way Spout does it?
It is an old trade. Hedge funds and structured product desks have run it for decades, so the novel part is not the premium. The problem has always been the tail. If you sell calls and the stock rips through the strike, you eat it. That is why systematic volatility selling has the reputation it does, and why institutions are wary of the trade even when the expected value is good. They want the premium. They do not want the tail that comes attached to it.
What we do differently is separate the two and give each to the party that wants it. Because the vault has two sides, rather than one fund doing both, the return and the risk can go to different people. The lender receives the premium and carries no directional exposure to the stock. The borrower carries the tail, which costs them the upside above the strike. They are entirely comfortable with that, because they are long the asset anyway and they get a 0% loan in exchange.
Put another way, every borrower on Spout is running a covered call. It is the most widely used options strategy among retail investors, and millions of people already do it voluntarily. The only difference is what they are paid in. Normally you write a covered call and receive cash. Here you write one and receive free financing.
Two parties with opposite appetites: one wants yield without direction, the other wants leverage and already owns the risk. Until you have a permissionless two-sided market, those two have no way to trade with each other. That is what the vault is for, and that is the thing that did not exist before.
Why does this need tokenized stocks? What can you do onchain that a traditional brokerage account can’t?
Almost everything a tokenized stock does today is worse than a brokerage account. You can buy the same share from a broker for free, with better execution and real settlement. Any product whose entire proposition is “the same stock, but onchain” is asking people to accept something worse in exchange for novelty. That is why most of this category has not gone anywhere.
As far as I can tell, the prime brokerage-style borrowing we have built is the first thing you can do with a tokenized equity that beats the offchain version rather than imitating it.
Strictly speaking, the strategy does not require tokenized stocks. What it requires is that the vaults live onchain, because that is what lets liquidity arrive permissionlessly. You need a two-sided market where anyone can be the lender and nobody has to be approved to become one. A brokerage cannot do that. It has to know and onboard every participant.
But it works best with tokenized equities, because they are programmable and borrowing is only one layer of what you can stack on them. Someone can post tokenized stock here, borrow stablecoins at 0% and put those stablecoins to work somewhere else onchain the same afternoon. Try that with shares at a broker. The asset there is inert by design.
Which tokenized equities will borrowers be able to use, and how do you decide which assets to support?
Eleven at launch, deliberately. They span large cap tech, AI, crypto-linked ETFs, pharmaceuticals, energy, gold and financials.
We wanted the initial launch to be targeted. It is also important to note that the volatility gap only behaves predictably in large, liquid, heavily traded names, where there is a deep options market and constant institutional hedging flow. Move down the market cap curve and the options thin out, spreads widen and the gap becomes erratic. You can still write the calls. You just cannot promise anyone a consistent return from doing it. So we could probably support most of the top 200 stocks, but not more than that for now.
The round brings together venture funds, a market maker, a digital asset bank, among others. What do these backers bring beyond capital?
Each of them answers a question we could not answer on our own.
Draper Dragon is the Asia question. We expect Asia to be a large share of our eventual user base, and their entire practice is bridging US technology into Asian markets.
Anchorage Digital is the custody question. They are the first federally chartered digital asset bank in the United States. If you want institutions anywhere near this, custody is the first thing they ask about and the first thing that disqualifies you.
Flow Traders is the market structure question. We write options against real collateral on a weekly cycle, which makes execution quality not a detail but the product itself. Having one of the world’s largest market makers look closely at how we do that is worth more than the check.
We did not take money from anyone whose only contribution was money.
Your angels include Solana Labs co-founders Anatoly Yakovenko and Raj Gokal, and former CFTC chairman Chris Giancarlo. How did those relationships come about?
Both came from the same habit: I talk to a lot of people, and I read what they write.
I had read Chris Giancarlo’s work long before I contacted him. He was writing years ago about financial instruments moving onchain, at a point when most of the industry was busy launching another L2 nobody needed. He was describing what we are building before there was anywhere to build it. He also understands the regulatory terrain from the inside, which matters enormously in this category. I sent him a cold message, and he took the meeting.
With Toly and Raj, we knew we wanted to build on Solana, so we applied to the Solana Incubator and got in. That put us in rooms with people across Solana Labs and the Solana Foundation over a sustained period. What we are building lines up closely with what they have said publicly about what Solana is for: real financial activity at a cost that makes it sensible to do onchain. The relationship grew out of the work rather than out of a pitch.
Spout isn’t on mainnet yet. What has the devnet beta taught you so far, and what needs to happen before the private beta opens?
The most useful thing it has told us is who actually shows up, and there are two distinct people.
The first wants exposure to a stock but also wants their capital to stay liquid. They do not want to choose between owning the position and having money to deploy. They post the stock, take the stablecoins and go do something else with them.
The second is a long-term holder who wants leverage, and for that person the interest rate is the entire decision. Over a few weeks, a 12% margin rate is an annoyance. Over three years, it compounds into a serious share of the return. That person is not really shopping for a loan. They are shopping for more exposure, and the cost of carry determines how much of it they can hold. For them, 0% is not a better deal. It is a different product.
Before the private beta opens, the gate is audited. The protocol holds other people’s equity collateral and writes options against it. There is no version of this where we open it up before the contracts have been through external review.
You describe the longer-term plan as a credit layer that issuers, exchanges and wallets can plug into. What would that look like for a partner in practice?
A white-label margin product that drops into someone else’s interface. An exchange, a wallet or a tokenized equity issuer can offer their own users 0% borrowing against their holdings without building any of the machinery underneath it. The API is built. An SDK and an MCP server are in progress.
The way I think about it, we are a layer, not a destination. The useful property of building this onchain is that other people can build on top of you without asking permission. There are financial instruments and funds that could be constructed on top of a 0% borrow that do not exist yet, and then instruments on top of those. We do not need to imagine all of them. We need to make the layer underneath dependable enough that other people bother.
Spout is not yet live on mainnet. Its beta runs on Solana devnet, and the company says the private beta will open after its smart contracts have completed external audits.
Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz has joined the NEAR Foundation Council, the body that oversees NEAR Protocol's foundation and its biggest decisions, as NEAR Intents tops $33 billion in volume.
Helius CEO @mert has joined the NEAR Foundation Council, the body that oversees the NEAR Protocol foundation and its biggest decisions. He remains at @Helius, which builds Solana ($SOL) infrastructure used by Phantom, Jupiter and Coinbase.
Who sits on the NEAR Foundation Council
Polosukhin said Mumtaz's
Why NEAR Intents is the common threadMumtaz is an early user of NEAR Intents. Mumtaz's own view is that Solana, Zcash ($ZEC) and Bitcoin ($BTC) cannot win alone, and that @NEARProtocol is how they work together.
The appointment comes as NEAR Intents grows. For comparison,
The protocol's design explains the cross-chain pitch.
The seat gives a leading Solana infrastructure operator a formal role in NEAR governance, which suggests growing overlap between two ecosystems often seen as rivals.
SourcesThe Block: Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz joins NEAR Foundation Council
PR Newswire: Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz Joins the NEAR Foundation Council
Bankless: Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz Joins NEAR Foundation Council
When investors think about artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, Nvidia is often at the top of the list. Nvidia has become the world's largest company thanks to its vaunted graphics processing units (GPUs), which are considered indispensable for training and running AI models.
Another side of the coin is Cisco Systems, a blue chip tech company that makes switches, routers, and other equipment that moves information through data centers.
But there's another company that deserves attention: Arista Networks (ANET -5.04%). And while it may not attract the same attention as Nvidia, Arista is becoming a core AI infrastructure play by helping solve one of the biggest challenges facing data centers.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
What does Arista Networks do? AI data centers rely on thousands of graphics processing units (GPUs) working together to train and run complex artificial intelligence models. But all that computing power doesn't mean much if the processors can't communicate quickly enough. Massive amounts of data need to move between chips, servers, and storage systems, and slow connections can create bottlenecks that drag down the entire operation.
Arista's role is to make high-speed Ethernet switches that direct traffic through data centers, ensuring information gets where it needs to go without slowing everything down. Arista also develops networking software, including its Extensible Operating System (EOS), that helps operators manage those connections and keep their networks running efficiently.
As AI models become larger and more demanding, data centers need faster connections to keep those expensive GPUs working -- after all, having the most powerful processors is a waste of money if the underlying infrastructure doesn't allow them to work to capacity. And that's exactly the problem Arista is helping its customers solve.
In June, Arista introduced its 7060XE7 Series, a new generation of Ethernet networking equipment designed for AI infrastructure. The systems support connections running at 1.6 terabits per second, with up to approximately 100 terabits per second of total system bandwidth. Arista also says its support for linear pluggable optics can reduce interconnect power consumption by approximately 60% compared with traditional pluggable optics.
That's an important consideration for data center operators already dealing with enormous electricity demands. Faster networking is valuable, but reducing the power required to move information can also help control operating expenses.
ANET Arista Networks$185.58-$9.84 (-5.04%)
NYSE · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
Arista is expanding its role in AI infrastructure Arista isn't simply selling faster switches. The company is working to make Ethernet a larger part of how AI computing systems communicate.
On Oct. 7, Arista announced a new rack-scale networking architecture developed with technology partners including Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Qualcomm.
Its Etherlink SU-144 design supports connections among up to 144 AI accelerators within a single-hop network, with an architecture that scales across racks to support up to 1,024 accelerators.
The distinction matters because Arista is moving beyond connecting separate servers and data center racks. It's developing technology that allows large groups of AI processors to communicate more closely, using Ethernet as an alternative to proprietary networking systems.
That could give cloud providers greater flexibility when choosing computing equipment and building new AI systems.
Arista stock hasn't disappointed While Nvidia and Cisco may get more attention, Arista stock has outperformed both so far this year, rising 54% versus a 50% jump for Cisco and a 20% gain for Nvidia.
Revenue in the second quarter was $3.03 billion, up 37.7% from a year ago and 12.1% sequentially. Net income was $1.21 billion, up from $888 million a year ago, and diluted earnings per share was $0.95 versus $0.70 in Q2 2025.
ANET data by YCharts
"Customers see networking as the central nervous system for infrastructure from the client to campus to data and AI centers," CEO Jayshree Ullal said.
The company is planning to report its third-quarter earnings on Nov. 3, and has issued guidance for revenue of $3.3 billion and diluted net income between $1.06 and $1.08 per share.
Arista Networks is an AI stock worth owning Nvidia remains a major force in AI computing, and Cisco is a formidable networking competitor. Arista also faces competition from proprietary networking technologies and the risk that major cloud customers will develop their own equipment.
But Arista has a compelling role in the AI build-out. Its equipment addresses a problem that becomes more demanding as companies deploy additional processors -- moving enormous amounts of data quickly, reliably, and without wasting electricity.
Investors don't have to own the company that makes the GPUs to benefit from the expansion of AI infrastructure spending. Arista offers a viable way to participate through the networking equipment that helps put all that computing power to work.
Akcie společnosti MongoDB (MDB) ve sledovaném dni vzrostly o 2,86 % na 366,49 USD za akcii. Analytici pro nadcházející čtvrtletí očekávají zisk na akcii (EPS) ve výši 1,60 USD a tržby 759,79 milionu USD.
In the latest close session, MongoDB (MDB - Free Report) was up +2.86% at $366.49. The stock exceeded the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 0.33% for the day. Elsewhere, the Dow gained 1.08%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq added 0.08%.
Shares of the database platform witnessed a loss of 5.33% over the previous month, trailing the performance of the Computer and Technology sector with its gain of 1.62%, and the S&P 500's gain of 1.41%.
The upcoming earnings release of MongoDB will be of great interest to investors. In that report, analysts expect MongoDB to post earnings of $1.6 per share. This would mark year-over-year growth of 21.21%. Our most recent consensus estimate is calling for quarterly revenue of $759.79 million, up 20.93% from the year-ago period.
For the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $6.5 per share and a revenue of $3.02 billion, representing changes of +30.78% and +22.69%, respectively, from the prior year.
Investors should also take note of any recent adjustments to analyst estimates for MongoDB. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability.
Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To benefit from this, we have developed the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model which takes these estimate changes into account and provides an actionable rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, running from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), holds an admirable track record of superior performance, independently audited, with #1 stocks contributing an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed an unchanged state. MongoDB currently has a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy).
Looking at valuation, MongoDB is presently trading at a Forward P/E ratio of 54.85. For comparison, its industry has an average Forward P/E of 20.42, which means MongoDB is trading at a premium to the group.
It is also worth noting that MDB currently has a PEG ratio of 2.5. The PEG ratio is akin to the commonly utilized P/E ratio, but this measure also incorporates the company's anticipated earnings growth rate. The Internet - Software industry currently had an average PEG ratio of 1.18 as of yesterday's close.
The Internet - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. This group has a Zacks Industry Rank of 83, putting it in the top 34% of all 250+ industries.
The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our individual industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Be sure to use Zacks.com to monitor all these stock-influencing metrics, and more, throughout the forthcoming trading sessions.
Proti společnosti Fluence Energy (FLNC) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným zavádějícím informacím o výrobních kapacitách, objednávkové knize a výhledu tržeb pro fiskální rok 2026.
Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Fluence Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FLNC) between November 24, 2025 and September 16, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important November 30, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
So what: If you purchased Fluence Energy securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
What to do next: To join the Fluence Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/fluence-energy-inc-2026-09/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 30, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Fluence Energy's ability to deliver its backlog and recognize the revenue underlying its fiscal 2026 guidance depended on new contract manufacturing facilities, including facilities that were not completed, not operational, and/or not capable of producing at the volumes the guidance assumed; (2) the corrective measures Fluence Energy had implemented to address production problems at its contract manufacturers were not remediating those problems, which persisted and extended to Fluence Energy's new facilities; (3) as a result, a material portion of the backlog that defendants represented as "securing" or "covering" Fluence Energy's fiscal 2026 revenue guidance were likely to be delivered and recognized in fiscal 2026; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Fluence Energy's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Fluence Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/fluence-energy-inc-2026-09/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
Proti společnosti Papa Johns byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným zavádějícím tvrzením o transformaci. Akcie 6. srpna 2026 po zveřejnění výsledků za 2. čtvrtletí klesly o 17,18 %.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 15, 2026) - Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Papa John's International, Inc. ("Papa Johns" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PZZA) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Papa Johns common stock between August 7, 2025 and August 5, 2026 (the "Class Period").
CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE
If you are an investor in Papa Johns and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us. You may also contact Kaplan Fox by emailing [email protected] or by calling (646) 315-9003.
DEADLINE REMINDER: If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the court no later than November 2, 2026 for an opportunity to be lead plaintiff for the purported class. If you have losses we encourage you to contact us to learn more about the lead plaintiff process. You need not seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that throughout the Class Period defendants disseminated materially false and misleading statements claiming that Papa Johns transformation was working to stabilize and improve the Company's growth while concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Papa Johns' transformation.
On August 6, 2026, according to the complaint, Papa Johns issued its second quarter 2026 financial results, reporting an 8.3% decrease in North American comparable sales, the suspension of its dividend, and a sharp reduction in its 2026 outlook from a 3% decline in North American comparable sales at the midpoint to a 7% annual decline. During the related conference call, CEO Todd Allan Penegor stated that "it's clear that our transformation is taking longer than expected" and "we must execute better and move faster." On this news, Papa Johns' stock price fell $5.11 or 17.18%, to close at $24.64 per share on August 6, 2026, thereby injuring investors.
WHY CONTACT KAPLAN FOX?
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP is a nationally recognized law firm focused on complex litigation, with offices in New York, Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New Jersey. Founded in 1956, the firm has spent more than 50 years prosecuting securities, antitrust, and consumer protection actions in federal and state courts nationwide, recovering more than $10 billion for clients and the classes it has represented.
Kaplan Fox is widely regarded as one of the nation's premier plaintiffs' securities litigation firms and has received recognition from Chambers and Partners, Benchmark Litigation, Super Lawyers, and Lawdragon. Serving as lead or co-lead counsel in many landmark cases, the firm has secured some of the largest recoveries in the history of securities litigation, including a $2.425 billion recovery on behalf of Bank of America shareholders in In re Bank of America—the largest recovery ever obtained for claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act—$800 million recovered for the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and other pension funds in ATRS v. Allianz Global Investors, and a $475 million settlement in In re Merrill Lynch.
For decades, Kaplan Fox has represented public pension funds, institutional investors, businesses, and individuals in high-stakes litigation. Through its successful advocacy and precedent-setting victories, the firm has helped shape important areas of securities and corporate law while advancing accountability and protecting investor interests.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
If you have any questions about this Notice, your rights, or your interests, please contact:
Contacting or submitting information to Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor an obligation on the part of Kaplan Fox to retain you as a client.
Advokátní kancelář Rosen Law Firm vyšetřuje možné nároky akcionářů společnosti J.B. Hunt (JBHT) v souvislosti s údajně zavádějícími informacemi. Společnost ve 3. čtvrtletí očekávala náklady o 25 mil. USD vyšší než ve 2. čtvrtletí.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: JBHT) resulting from allegations that J.B. Hunt may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
SO WHAT: If you purchased J.B. Hunt securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/jb-hunt-transport-services-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On September 16, 2026, CNBC published an article entitled "J.B. Hunt stock plunges 10% after company warns third-quarter earnings will fall." The article further stated that J.B. Hunt's Chief Financial Officer had "said between costs for recruiting, advertising, onboarding, training and sign-on bonuses, the company expects to see about $25 million more in the third quarter compared with the second quarter."
On this news, J.B. Hunt's shares fell sharply in intraday trading on September 16, 2026.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/319225
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence?
Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
JB Hunt ve čtvrtletí končícím v září 2026 vykázala upravený zisk 1,82 USD na akcii a tržby ve výši 3,68 miliardy USD, čímž překonala konsenzuální odhady.
JB Hunt (JBHT - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $1.82 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.81 per share. This compares to earnings of $1.76 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.
This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +0.55%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this trucking and logistics company would post earnings of $1.71 per share when it actually produced earnings of $1.91, delivering a surprise of +11.7%.
Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times.
JB Hunt, which belongs to the Zacks Transportation - Truck industry, posted revenues of $3.68 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 3.15%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $3.05 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates three times over the last four quarters.
The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.
JB Hunt shares have added about 19.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 12.8%.
What's Next for JB Hunt?While JB Hunt has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?
There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.
Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.
Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for JB Hunt was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $2.11 on $3.65 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $7.34 on $13.7 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.
Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Transportation - Truck is currently in the bottom 35% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
One other stock from the same industry, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings (KNX - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on October 21.
This trucking company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.75 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +134.4%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 1% lower over the last 30 days to the current level.
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings' revenues are expected to be $2.12 billion, up 10.1% from the year-ago quarter.
Semtech zvýšil výhled tržeb pro 3. čtvrtletí fiskálního roku 2027 na 417,5 milionu USD, což představuje meziroční nárůst o 56 %. Do roku 2030 pak cílí na tržby ve výši 3,2 miliardy USD.
Semtech Stock Rallies on Strong Q2 Results and Raised GuidanceSemtech NASDAQ: SMTC raised its fiscal third-quarter 2027 outlook and outlined long-term financial targets through fiscal 2030, citing growth in data center connectivity and LoRa products, higher-margin portfolio mix and a substantially improved balance sheet.
During the company’s analyst day, Semtech said it expects fiscal Q3 2027 revenue of $417.5 million at the midpoint, representing 56% year-over-year growth. The outlook calls for consolidated adjusted gross margin of 59%, or 64% excluding the cellular modules business that Semtech expects to divest, as well as adjusted operating margin of 33% and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $1.14.
Get Semtech alerts:
Semtech’s Explosive Rally May Only Be Getting StartedThe company said it continues to expect regulatory clearances for the cellular modules divestiture and anticipates closing the transaction in its fiscal fourth quarter.
Balance Sheet Transformation
Semtech highlighted progress in reducing leverage and interest expense since fiscal 2024. The company said net cash interest costs were $82 million in fiscal 2024, while free cash flow was negative $123 million. As of the second quarter of fiscal 2027, annual free cash flow was $193 million, according to the presentation.
How Semtech’s Data Center Chips Are Powering the AI BoomNet debt declined to $299 million at the end of Q2 2027 from $1.3 billion at the end of fiscal 2024, while net leverage fell to 1.1 times from 10.5 times. Semtech reported $503 million in debt and $204 million in cash and cash equivalents at the end of the quarter, alongside $357 million of availability under its line of credit.
The company said $100.5 million of debt comes due in fiscal 2028, with no scheduled maturities in fiscal 2029 or fiscal 2030. The remaining $402.5 million is due in fiscal 2031. Semtech expects its net leverage ratio to move below 1 times, with a longer-term maintenance target below zero net leverage.
Data Center and LoRa Drive Portfolio Shift
Semtech said data center and LoRa each represented about 7% of total revenue in fiscal 2024. For fiscal Q3 2027, excluding the cellular modules business, the company expects data center products to account for 40% of revenue and LoRa products to represent 19%.
Data center revenue was $61 million for all of fiscal 2024 and is expected to reach $145 million in fiscal Q3 2027 alone. LoRa revenue also totaled $61 million for fiscal 2024 and is expected to be $68 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2027.
Hong Hou, Semtech’s president and chief executive officer, said the company sees expanding LoRa opportunities across smart buildings, security, drone control, edge AI connectivity and Amazon Sidewalk. He said next-generation LoRa products are intended to offer lower standby current, higher data-transmission rates and software development kits designed to facilitate deployment.
Hou also discussed demand for connectivity solutions in AI infrastructure. He said near-package optics, or NPO, is expected to begin entering volume production near the end of next year, followed by co-packaged optics, or CPO. He described NPO as offering much of the power-saving benefit of CPO while retaining flexibility through an open socket architecture.
Imran Sherazi, senior vice president and general manager of Semtech’s Signal Integrity Products Group, said the company is focused on supplying linear redrivers across formats, including active copper cables, flyover cables and line-card applications. Sherazi said the company increased its share in a cited market from 18% to more than 50% and intends to continue pursuing share gains.
Fiscal 2030 Framework
Semtech expects revenue to reach $3.2 billion in fiscal 2030, implying a 38% compound annual growth rate from fiscal 2026. The fiscal 2026 base excludes $166 million in cellular module revenue associated with the business slated for divestiture.
Data center revenue is expected to compound at a 75% rate to $2.1 billion by fiscal 2030.
LoRa revenue is expected to compound at a 30% rate through fiscal 2030.
Adjusted gross margin is targeted at 70% in fiscal 2030.
Adjusted operating margin is expected to be 48% to 50%.
Free cash flow is expected to equal 35% of revenue.
Adjusted diluted EPS is projected at $12.40 to $13, representing a 64% to 66% compound annual growth rate.
The company said its fiscal 2030 EPS framework assumes a 20% non-GAAP tax rate and 104 million weighted-average diluted shares outstanding.
Investment and Capital Allocation
Semtech said research and development spending increased 27% between fiscal 2025 and the trailing 12 months ended in Q2 2027, while selling, general and administrative expense increased 8% over the same period. The company said it has focused R&D spending on customer-aligned, higher-return projects while maintaining an affordability framework.
Its capital allocation priorities are organic R&D investment, capability-driven acquisitions and balance-sheet strength. Semtech cited its March acquisition of Semtech Photonics Products, also referred to as HieFo, as an example of its approach. The acquisition added domestic indium phosphide manufacturing expertise and expanded the company’s AI connectivity portfolio into photonics, according to the presentation.
Hou said the company’s objective is to pursue high-bandwidth, low-power and low-latency connectivity opportunities while expanding earnings and cash flow through a more differentiated portfolio.
About Semtech (NASDAQ:SMTC)Semtech Corporation is a global semiconductor and technology company that designs and supplies analog and mixed-signal products for communications, industrial, automotive, consumer, and infrastructure applications. Its solutions are used to manage, protect, connect, and transmit data in electronic systems.
The company's portfolio includes signal-integrity products, protection devices, power-management components, optical and high-speed connectivity solutions, and video-processing technologies.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Should You Invest $1,000 in Semtech Right Now?Before you consider Semtech, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Semtech wasn't on the list.
While Semtech currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI wave will soon hit public markets with Anthropic and OpenAI set to go public later this year. However, you don't have to wait to invest. This report shows seven AI stocks that you can buy today while the big model providers get ready to go public.
Get This Free Report
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
CoreWeave (CRWV +5.94%), one of the leading "neoclouds" racing to meet the seemingly endless demand for artificial intelligence (AI) computing power, is once again making headlines. This time, however, it's not for setting another record sales figure or inking a new deal with OpenAI or Anthropic.
Instead, CoreWeave is in the news because its rather large debt load is getting more expensive to insure. In other words, investors are worried the company could default.
On Thursday, the spread on its five-year credit default swaps (CDS) reached a record level. By midday, it stood at 1,038 basis points, up 164% year over year. 1000 basis points is generally considered in "distressed" territory.
What is a credit default swap?A credit default swap (CDS) is basically an insurance contract on a company's debts -- a contract where the buyer pays an ongoing fee (like a premium) in exchange for a payout if the debt goes bad. And just to be clear, you don't actually have to own the company's debt to buy a CDS.
Of course, the riskier the borrower looks, the more that protection costs, reflected in the spread -- the portion of the amount insured that the buyer pays each year. So, a $1,000,000 CDS on CoreWeave debt at today's rate -- 1,038 basis points or 10.38% -- would cost you $103,800 a year.
Why higher borrowing costs could hurt CoreWeaveCoreWeave has borrowed heavily to fund its growth and is now on the hook for roughly $51 billion in debt and lease obligations. That's a lot to carry for a company still losing money. Its net loss reached $626 million last quarter, up from $290 million a year earlier.
The cash picture doesn't look great. Capital spending jumped to $6.4 billion, helping push free cash flow -- cash from operations minus capital spending -- to negative $5.7 billion. Keeping that up requires enormous amounts of outside funding and more debt.
While rising CDS rates don't guarantee a default, they indicate the market is growing less comfortable with the risks of CoreWeave's model. Future borrowing -- or any refinancing of its current obligations -- could become more expensive. And if that happens, if lenders demand a higher and higher rate to provide more capital, the chances of a default go up as its cash flows face even more pressure.
CoreWeave's growth is still impressiveOf course, we need to be clear that CoreWeave is indeed growing like crazy. The company's latest quarter saw it bring in $2.58 billion, more than twice what it made during that same period a year earlier. And the company has an ever-growing backlog that has reached $104 billion in promised revenue.
Image source: Getty Images.
A financial tightrope with little room for errorThat growth is impressive, and it's why investors have been willing to give CoreWeave so much money in the first place. But turning that backlog into revenue will continue to be a challenge that will only get harder if its debt keeps getting more expensive. If it gets too expensive or worse, if lenders refuse to extend more funding, the whole model could fall apart.
In my view, CoreWeave is walking a financial tightrope that leaves too little room for error and relies too heavily on debt. Today's spike in CDS rates shows the market may agree.
Iren (IREN -0.56%), a vertically integrated AI cloud and data center operator transitioning from Bitcoin mining, closed at $30.39, down 0.56%. The stock sank below $27 per share in early trading amid reports of pressure on AI infrastructure funding, following Gartner's warning that weighed on shares. Investors are watching AI cloud growth and capex commentary.
Trading volume reached 104.7 million shares, coming in about 134% above its three-month average of 44.8 million shares. Iren IPO'd in 2021 and has grown 24% since going public.
How the markets moved todayThe S&P 500 (^GSPC +0.33%) closed at 7,744, up 0.33%, while the Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC +0.08%) finished at 26,713, up 0.08%. AI cloud and Bitcoin mining infrastructure peer Core Scientific closed at $14.46, up 6.99%.
What this means for investorsResearch and advisory firm Gartner released a report yesterday that suggested over $3.5 trillion in AI infrastructure investments could be at risk of devaluation by the end of 2030 if AI providers maintain their current level of capital expenditure.
That warning drove shares of neocloud AI infrastructure companies lower, as large capital investments could falter. Iren stock touched a 52-week low based on those fears.
Gartner warned more than 80% of neocloud providers could cease current operations as independent businesses by 2030. Credit-market stress surrounding neocloud company CoreWeave's high-yield bond yields near 15% added pressure across AI infrastructure names.
Iren stock recovered early losses as investors may have realized the company has about half of its GPU capex funded through customer contract prepayments.
The reaction to the Gartner report should be based on a company-specific analysis rather than a sector wide move. That helps explain the stock's recovery today.
Howard Smith has positions in Iren. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Injective má poměr tržeb k plně zředěné valuaci 0,95, před Solanou (0,83) a Arbitrem (0,78). Tržby financují pravidelné měsíční stahování tokenů INJ z oběhu.
Injective is making a numbers driven pitch to crypto investors. Its revenue to fully dilution valuation (FDV) ratio now leads the major blockchain platforms shown in the year 2026 year to date comparison, putting INJ ahead of better known rivals on this particular metric. The catch? A strong ratio can support a valuation argument, but it doesn’t guarantee a rising token price.
Injective Takes the Lead on Revenue to FDVThe chart places Injective at a revenue to FDV ratio of 0.95, ahead of Solana at 0.83 and Arbitrum 0.78. That’s more than 20% above Arbitrum and ahead of Solana.
The gap looks even wider against Ethereum, at 0.11, and both Sui and Avalanche, each shown at 0.08. Injective’s ratio is over eight times Ethereum’s and more than ten times those two networks’ figures.
Those numbers make Injective stand out in this comparison. Revenue relative to fully diluted valuation offers one way to assess how much onchain revenue a network generates against its potential token valuation. Still, one metric can’t tell the whole story about risk or future performance.
Injective now leads all major blockchains by revenue to fully diluted market cap.
→ Ahead of Solana
→ Over 20% ahead of Arbitrum
→ Over 8x Ethereum
→ Over 10x Sui and Avalanche
Revenue / FDV is one of the clearest measures of whether a network’s valuation is backed by real… pic.twitter.com/MLLzOCzqJP
— Injective 🥷 (@injective) October 15, 2026 The Buyback Mechanism Gives INJ Another AngleInjective’s pitch goes beyond the chart. Onchain revenue flows into the INJ Community BuyBack, which permanently removes INJ tokens from circulation every month.
That creates a potential supply reduction mechanism tied to network revenue. But the effect on market price depends on more than token removals alone, the figures provided don’t quantify the buyback’s price impact.
Future Growth Still Has to DeliverInjective expects revenue to accelerate as it onboards new tokenization initiatives and launches additional products in the coming months. If that happens, the revenue story could strengthen.
For now, the Injective revenue to FDV lead is a compelling snapshot, not a guarantee. Investors will need to watch whether new products generate sustained revenue and whether the buyback translates into meaningful token value over time.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX -2.33%) had a major IPO in June. The stock started hot, reached around $200 per share, then crashed to $110. However, it has settled back to just above $150 per share, which is ironically right where it started trading on its opening day. This tells me that the market has settled into a normalized valuation for the stock, but does that mean it's a good investment?
A $2,000 investment may not sound like much now, but it could grow substantially depending on whether SpaceX works out. But could it help you retire early? Maybe. But it won't be as quickly as you want.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
SpaceX is already a massive business
For a $2,000 investment to help you retire early, it needs to provide substantial returns, perhaps growing to $200,000 over a longer investment time frame, such as 15 to 20 years. The problem with SpaceX is the size at which it went public. Because it's a $2 trillion company, if the stock were to 10x, it would be worth $200 trillion. For reference, the global stock market is estimated to be worth over $150 trillion when all companies are combined.
SPCX Space Exploration Technologies$148.62-$3.54 (-2.33%)
NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
There just aren't enough investment dollars to go around to make SpaceX much larger than it already is, so investors need to shift their mindset.
Instead of thinking of SpaceX as a stock that will deliver huge returns, investors need to determine whether SpaceX can beat the S&P 500 moving forward. The S&P 500 averages about a 10% return each year, and beating this is the baseline an individual investor should aim for. Can SpaceX do that? I think so.
A major clue to SpaceX's growth potential is its revenue growth rate. During Q2, it was an impressive 92%. That well eclipses the 10% threshold established above, but SpaceX also has a ton of growth already baked into this stock price, so this growth rate was necessary to uphold expectations.
We'll have to see how SpaceX does over the next few years, but with its involvement in space exploration, artificial intelligence, and satellite internet, I'm confident it can continue to grow its revenue rapidly. These are major growth industries to be in, giving SpaceX a great growth edge.
The biggest holdup with SpaceX stock right now is its profitability. Currently, it isn't profitable, and it may not be for some time. Investors must grapple with this, as it does shift confidence in the investment. But if SpaceX can continue growing its revenue at an above-average pace and become profitable, I don't doubt that SpaceX will beat the market and accelerate your path to retiring, really. However, it may not happen as quickly as you would hope.
Akcie Apple letos vzrostly o 25 %, ale obchodují se za téměř 40násobek zisku za posledních 12 měsíců, což představuje zdaleka nejvyšší poměr ceny k zisku (P/E) mezi velkými technologickými společnostmi.
Apple (AAPL -0.28%) has quietly been one of the better-performing stocks of 2026. It has risen about 25% so far in 2026, easily crushing the S&P 500's (^GSPC +0.33%) 14% rise. But the question is: Is it still a good stock to buy compared to other big tech names?
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Want AI exposure? Apple doesn't have it Part of the reason why Apple's stock has done so well so far this year is its lack of artificial intelligence (AI) exposure. While I personally think this is a bad strategy for Apple over the long term, not every investor does. The company is taking a very measured approach to AI, and in true Apple style, it's once again a late arrival to the party.
Apple has taken its time to launch AI features in its ecosystem, and only recently introduced generative AI to Siri, its virtual assistant. However, the model behind Siri AI isn't anything Apple developed in-house; it uses Google Gemini from Alphabet.
This decision could prove to be brilliant. After all, Apple has hardly spent anything on capital expenditures recently compared to Alphabet.
AAPL Capital Expenditures (TTM) data by YCharts
Alphabet has spent hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and will continue to do so. Apple has spent practically nothing, and although it will need to pay to use Gemini, the cost of that over the next decade may not eclipse what Alphabet spent in a year on AI computing capacity. As a result, Apple may have a winning strategy here.
Furthermore, Apple may be developing a suite of AI products that it will offer on a monthly subscription basis. This would create a new revenue stream for Apple if users find the products worth paying for.
Once again, Apple would likely use someone else's AI model, so its operating costs would be only marginally higher than those of funding massive data centers itself. However, because Apple cannot control the capabilities of another firm's AI model, it may not be able to get exactly what it wants from AI.
AAPL Apple$342.00-$0.96 (-0.28%)
NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
We'll see how Apple adopts AI, but because it isn't spending big to build it out, investors have fallen in love with the stock again. While their enthusiasm for it isn't necessarily misguided, it has caused Apple stock to swell to a premium valuation.
The question is, does it deserve it?
Apple's stock isn't cheap From a price-to-earnings ratio standpoint, Apple is by far the most expensive big tech stock, trading at nearly 40 times trailing earnings.
AAPL PE Ratio data by YCharts.
This is approaching some of the highest levels it has traded at in the past few years, which should raise a red flag for investors. If Apple gets too expensive, it could spend a few years trading sideways because its future growth has been priced in. In that case, it would be a less desirable stock to own.
Apple's fiscal 2027 has already started, which means when next fiscal year's results are used to price the stock, you're using 2028 projections. From a 2028 standpoint, Apple is still valued at a fairly expensive 31 times earnings.
AAPL PE Ratio (Forward 1y) data by YCharts.
This means that if Apple's stock price doesn't move from now until October 2028 and the company's results are in line with analysts' expectations, it would trade for about 31.5 times earnings. That's about where I'd expect an average big tech stock to trade, which means Apple has about two years' worth of growth priced into its stock.
That doesn't bode well for its medium-term returns, which makes it a stock to steer clear of. While I understand that Apple has become a popular pick because it hasn't spent much on AI, I think this trend has been overblown. Investors would be better off looking into AI investments with cheaper valuations compared to Apple.
Some companies learn the hard way that tussling with organized labor often isn't a winning proposition, and when those disagreements are lengthy and public, nobody wins. But there are plenty of losers, including the company itself, its workers, and shareholders.
It looks as if Boeing (BA +2.20%) got that memo because earlier this month, the aerospace and defense Goliath averted a strike with 17,000 engineers and technical workers. For many of the largest industrial companies by market cap, of which Boeing is one, engineers and technical staffers are among the most essential personnel, so keeping them happy is a good idea.
Boeing stock has been grounded, but it could take flight again. Image source: Getty Images.
Boeing may have accomplished that objective as the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace came away saying it notched some wins it previously thought "were completely out of reach." Still, Boeing shares are off 11.3% over the past month, extending a bear market in which the stock is down 26.7% from its 52-week high. Those are ominous statistics, but I see opportunity in this decline.
Boeing's a battlefield, but it has positives Undoubtedly, Boeing has its warts. On the commercial aircraft side of the equation, which has been a thorn in the stock's side for multiple years, Boeing previously warned that supply chain issues could present production snags in its 737. Compounding the issue, an autopilot software "glitch" prompted a Sept. 28 sell-off in the shares.
Still, the defense side of the Boeing coin is appealing. The U.S. Navy recently chose Boeing over rival Northrop Grumman to deliver (likely in the 2030s) the sixth generation of carrier-based fighter jets. For fans of avionics and movies, the plane that will eventually replace the vaunted F-18 Super Hornet. This is an important, potentially lucrative contract for prospective Boeing investors to consider because, as just one example, F-18s were among the jets that flew more than 14,000 "sorties" (military speak for flight missions) during the USS Abraham Lincoln's recently concluded deployment.
That contract win came after the Air Force chose Boeing to develop the F-47, the plane that will replace the F-15. Arguably, there's an element of prestige in that contract win that Boeing's share price isn't reflecting because, in air-to-air combat, also known as dogfighting, the F-15 is undefeated.
$188.73+$4.07 (+2.20%)
NYSE · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
Just my two cents, but I believe Boeing deserves some credit for a contract win to develop the replacement for what some experts believe is the greatest fighter jet ever built. That credit should be accentuated at a time when Uncle Sam is boosting defense spending with an eye toward cementing U.S. air dominance for years to come.
Maybe a revolutionary idea Boeing is 110 years old, so calling it "old" is accurate, while labeling it "revolutionary" may seem like a stretch. But another reason this stock piques my interest is its credible ties to an emerging "modern-day industrial revolution," which some analysts believe is being ushered in by aerospace and defense companies.
In fact, Barclays analyst Anthony Valentini recently mentioned Boeing as a potential winner in an industrial revolution scenario.
Investors need not worship at the altar of everything analysts say. Still, there may be comfort in knowing Boeing has made some revolutionary inroads and is supported by government contract victories.
You're currently following this author!
Click to unsubscribe from email alerts.
Netflix is replacing content chief Bela Bajaria with former Disney TV executive Peter Rice.
Gonzalo Marroquin/Getty Images for Netflix; Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images; Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images
Netflix has hired a new content chief after a stock slump and struggles to grow its viewership.
Peter Rice, a former Fox and Disney executive, will oversee Netflix's movies and shows starting on October 26, the company announced on Thursday.
Rice will replace Bela Bajaria, who's leaving the company after almost a decade, Netflix said. Bajaria took the top content job in 2023 and memorably described the ideal Netflix show as a "gourmet cheeseburger."
The exec shake-up came a day after the streaming giant laid off about 1,000 employees on Wednesday, its biggest round of layoffs in four years.
Netflix has had a tough year. Shares are down nearly 40% in the past 12 months as investors increasingly worry about slower viewership growth and the company's long-term direction. Netflix's attempt to buy Warner Bros. — which was ultimately stymied by Paramount — soured the Wall Street narrative about the company's future.
Rice was previously the head of Disney's TV arm, where he ran Hulu and networks like ABC, Disney Channel, and FX. He was fired from the Mouse House in 2022 by former Disney CEO Bob Chapek.
Bajaria "led enormous changes at Netflix," co-CEO Ted Sarandos said in a statement, crediting her for helping the streamer broaden its content mix to live events and sports.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Read next
Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know
Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know
Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know
Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know
James Faris
You're currently following this author!
Click to unsubscribe from email alerts.
James Faris is a media correspondent in New York City.He covers the business of media & entertainment, specifically the streaming, TV, and AI strategies of Hollywood giants like Disney, Skydance (Paramount-WBD), and Netflix. He previously wrote about the stock market, the economy, and real estate.James joined Business Insider after graduating magna cum laude from James Madison University.Email James at [email protected] and follow him on LinkedIn.
FinCEN udělil Bank of America pokutu ve výši 1,2 mld. USD za úmyslné porušení pravidel proti praní peněz. Banka ve 3. čtvrtletí zaúčtovala stejnou regulatorní sankci.
SAN DIEGO, Oct. 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential claims on behalf of current, long-term shareholders of Bank of America Corporation (NYSE: BAC) against certain of its officers and directors for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty.
What Should Bank of America Shareholders Do?
If you have held Bank of America shares before December 2024, and continue to hold shares, you may have standing to seek corporate governance reforms at Bank of America, including improvements to internal controls, regulatory compliance, and executive oversight.
To learn more, visit: https://www.johnsonfistel.com/investigations/bank-of-america-corp/
You may also contact Johnson Fistel, PLLP at [email protected] or (619) 814-4471. There is no cost or obligation to you.
Investigation Background
On October 13, 2026, the U.S. Treasury Department announced that its Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had assessed a $1.2 billion penalty against Bank of America, N.A., a subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation. According to Treasury, the bank admitted that it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act by failing to maintain an adequate anti-money-laundering program, conduct required due diligence for foreign correspondent accounts, and file suspicious activity reports. The enforcement action addressed failures involving priority national-security risks, including Chinese money-laundering networks and illicit finance along the southwest border.
The coordinated action included a $750 million civil penalty imposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which is credited against FinCEN’s $1.2 billion penalty. The OCC found that the bank’s transaction monitoring system failed to properly monitor trillions of dollars in transactions, resulting in numerous late suspicious activity reports involving billions of dollars. The OCC further stated that significant compliance deficiencies persisted after a December 2024 cease-and-desist order.
On October 14, 2026, Bank of America reported that its third-quarter results included a $1.2 billion regulatory settlement charge, reducing diluted earnings per share by $0.17. The company reported quarterly net income of $6.9 billion, compared with $8.3 billion in the third quarter of 2025.
Johnson Fistel is investigating whether certain officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with oversight of the company’s Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money-laundering compliance programs, and whether shareholders may pursue remedies on the company’s behalf.
About Johnson Fistel, PLLP | Top Law Firm, Securities Fraud, Investor Rights
Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm with offices in California, New York, Georgia, Idaho, and Colorado. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits. The firm also represents foreign investors who have purchased securities on U.S. exchanges.
Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Johnson Fistel, PLLP has paid for the dissemination of this promotional communication, and Frank J. Johnson is the attorney responsible for its content.
Contacts
Johnson Fistel, PLLP
501 W. Broadway, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
James Baker | (619) 814-4471 [email protected]
https://www.johnsonfistel.com/
, /PRNewswire/ -- Dow (NYSE: DOW) has declared a dividend of 35 cents per share, payable December 11, 2026, to shareholders of record on November 30, 2026.
This marks the 461st consecutive dividend paid by the Company or its affiliates since 1912.
About Dow
Dow (NYSE: DOW) is one of the world's leading materials science companies, serving customers in high-growth markets such as packaging, infrastructure, mobility and consumer applications. Our global breadth, asset integration and scale, customer-focused innovation and leading business positions enable us to achieve profitable growth and help deliver a sustainable future. We operate manufacturing sites in 29 countries and employed approximately 34,600 people as of year-end 2025. Dow delivered sales of approximately $40 billion in 2025. References to Dow or the Company mean Dow Inc. and its subsidiaries. Learn more about us at www.dow.com.
Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements often address expected future business and financial performance, financial condition, and other matters, and often contain words or phrases such as "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "opportunity," "outlook," "plan," "project," "seek," "should," "strategy," "target," "will," "will be," "will continue," "will likely result," "would" and similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words or phrases.
Forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that are beyond Dow's control, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements and speak only as of the date the statements were made. These factors include, but are not limited to: sales of Dow's products; Dow's expenses, future revenues and profitability; any supply chain, operational or other disruptions, sanctions, export restrictions, or increased economic uncertainty related to the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East; capital requirements and need for and availability of financing; unexpected barriers in the development of technology, including with respect to Dow's contemplated capital and operating projects; Dow's ability to realize its commitment to carbon neutrality on the contemplated timeframe, including the completion and success of its integrated ethylene cracker and derivatives facility in Alberta, Canada; size of the markets for Dow's products and services and ability to compete in such markets; Dow's ability to develop and market new products and optimally manage product life cycles; the rate and degree of market acceptance of Dow's products; significant litigation and environmental matters and related contingencies and unexpected expenses; the success of competing technologies that are or may become available; the ability to protect Dow's intellectual property in the United States and abroad; Dow's ability to realize expected benefits from Transform to Outperform on the contemplated timeframe; developments related to contemplated restructuring activities and proposed divestitures or acquisitions such as workforce reduction, manufacturing facility and/or asset closure and related exit and disposal activities, and the benefits and costs associated with each of the foregoing; fluctuations in energy and raw material prices; management of process safety and product stewardship; changes in relationships with Dow's significant customers and suppliers; changes in public sentiment and political leadership; increased concerns about plastics in the environment and lack of a circular economy for plastics at scale; changes in consumer preferences and demand; changes in laws and regulations, political conditions, tariffs and trade policies, or industry development; global economic and capital markets conditions, such as inflation, market uncertainty, interest and currency exchange rates, and equity and commodity prices; business, logistics and supply disruptions; security threats, such as acts of sabotage, terrorism or war, including the ongoing conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East; weather events and natural disasters; disruptions in Dow's information technology networks and systems, including the impact of cyberattacks; risks related to Dow's separation from DowDuPont Inc. such as Dow's obligation to indemnify DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and/or Corteva, Inc. for certain liabilities; and any global and regional economic impacts of a pandemic or other public health-related risks and events on Dow's business.
Where, in any forward-looking statement, an expectation or belief as to future results or events is expressed, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of management and expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. A detailed discussion of principal risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section titled "Risk Factors" contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the Company's subsequent reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These are not the only risks and uncertainties that Dow faces. There may be other risks and uncertainties that Dow is unable to identify at this time or that Dow does not currently expect to have a material impact on its business. If any of those risks or uncertainties develops into an actual event, it could have a material adverse effect on Dow's business. Dow Inc. and The Dow Chemical Company and its consolidated subsidiaries assume no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by securities and other applicable laws.
®™ Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow
Společnost Micron ve fiskálním roce 2026 zvýšila tržby o 256 % na 133,2 miliardy USD; výhled tržeb na 1. čtvrtletí fiskálního roku 2027 činí 60 až 63 miliard USD.
Micron Technology (MU +1.87%) just closed out one of the strangest, most extraordinary fiscal years a chipmaker has ever posted. Revenue in its fiscal 2026 hit $133.2 billion, up 256% from the year before, earnings soared almost tenfold from $7.59 per share to $74.33 per share, and the company went from an afterthought in most portfolios to a roughly $1.1 trillion megacap in the space of about 18 months.
I feel like I've spent the entire year checking this ticker, only to see the stock post consistently breathtaking gains. Before getting into what $2,000 invested in it today might look like in 2029, it's worth understanding exactly what this company is up to. Let's get into what's driving these numbers that large, because it isn't hype. It's a genuine, physical shortage of the memory chips that AI data centers need in growing amounts.
MU Micron Technology$931.24+$17.11 (+1.87%)
NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
What Micron actually reported this fall Micron's fiscal fourth-quarter results showed revenue of $54.23 billion, up 31% sequentially and 379% year over year. That marked the company's sixth consecutive quarterly revenue record. Non-GAAP earnings per share came in at $33.42, up from $3.03 in the prior-year period, and for the fiscal year, gross margin expanded to 81.1%, a 40-percentage-point jump from fiscal 2025. DRAM revenue alone topped $100 billion for the year, with fourth-quarter DRAM sales up 343% from a year earlier. Management is guiding for first-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue to land between $60 billion and $63 billion, meaning it expects the boom to keep accelerating.
Image source: Getty Images.
This fall, the headline product news centers on HBM4, the latest-generation high-bandwidth memory that sits directly inside AI accelerators. Micron announced what it's calling the industry's first custom HBM4E implementation, developed specifically for Nvidia's (NVDA -1.84%) next-generation GPUs and NVLink Fusion platforms. The deal between them locks Micron into Nvidia's roadmap rather than leaving it to compete for generic orders. This is super bullish for Micron and a strong reason the stock has experienced gains of nearly 400% over the last year.
NVDA Nvidia$217.23-$4.07 (-1.84%)
NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/15/26
CEO Sanjay Mehrotra described a strong multiyear roadmap for future HBM products, and the company is simultaneously racing to build foundry capacity to keep up: It's pushing construction of a second fab in Idaho and broke ground on its first New York fab in January, part of a manufacturing build-out now backed by more than $6 billion in CHIPS Act funding.
Something to think about The memory chip business has always been brutally cyclical, and most of Micron's current numbers reflect price growth more than volume growth. DRAM and NAND contract prices have surged dramatically this year as Samsung, SK Hynix (SKHY -0.98%), and Micron -- the three largest players in the space by far -- all redirected production capacity toward high-margin HBM instead of ordinary memory, creating a supply squeeze that's pushed prices for all types of memory to levels this industry has never sustained for long.
All three are constructing new fab capacity, but that isn't expected to meaningfully ease the squeeze until 2027 or later. Historically, when that kind of production boost eventually arrives, supply catches up to demand and generally surpasses it, at which point prices fall hard. Whether this cycle breaks that pattern because the new demand driven by the AI trend is structurally different is the real question behind any 2029 prediction.
Math to consider Micron trades at around $950 a share today, down from an all-time high of $1,213 reached in June. In a bull case, I'd assume AI-driven memory demand stays structurally elevated through 2029, with revenue growing to around $190 billion and the market still willing to pay close to 8 times sales given Micron's locked-in HBM relationships. That implies a market cap near $1.5 trillion and a share price around $1,330, pushing that original $2,000 to roughly $2,690.
In a more conservative, historically grounded case, new supply from Micron's own expanding foundry operation and those of its competitors eventually catches up to demand sometime around 2028, memory prices normalize, and the company's revenue settles back closer to $100 billion with the multiple compressing to a more typical cyclical semiconductor level of around 5 times sales. That implies a market cap near $500 billion and a share price closer to $440, which would leave that initial $2,000 investment worth roughly $890.
