Market Signal Briefing

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Gold’s sudden reversal is beginning to influence how some market watchers see Bitcoin’s next move. In a market note shared on X, verified analyst Joao Wedson noted that the relationship between the two assets is unfolding in line with a sequence he outlined earlier this year wheregold peaks first, volatility erupts, Bitcoin reacts sharply afterward, and only later does liquidity begin to rotate back into Bitcoin.

Gold’s Euphoria Peak Was The Warning Sign Retail and Institutional enthusiasm reached a massive peak when gold reached an all-time high of $5,589 per ounce in late January. However, crypto analyst Joao Wedson flagged the move at the time as a buy climax consisting of a sharp, high-volume price spike caused by peak euphoria. 

The chart attached to the post by Joao Wedson demonstrates that moment precisely, marking a BC near gold’s top before a violent drop, then a later test in early March that failed to produce a lasting breakout above the January peak.

As of today, Sunday, March 22, 2026, gold is trading at $4,493 per ounce, which is a decline of roughly $150 (about -3.23%) from yesterday’s rate of $4,643. On March 19, gold was trading as low as $4,551, a drop of roughly 18.5% in less than two months, with the sell-off stretching to seven consecutive sessions, the worst week of price action since 1983.

Gold Buy Climax. Source: @joao_wedson On X

How Does This Affect Bitcoin? Bitcoin has largely underperformed compared to gold this year, but both assets have been coordinating during periods of declines. The upper half of Wedson’s chart draws a direct line from gold’s reversal into Bitcoin’s own decline. His point is not that both assets move tick for tick during crashes, but that Bitcoin often reacts more abruptly during the late stages of gold’s weakness.

Bitcoin is now trading at $68,582. Chart: TradingView Bitcoin does not lead during gold’s distribution phase, but it reacts to it and reacts violently. The speed of Bitcoin’s price movements means that the final stages of gold’s current decline, which may not yet be complete, carry outsized risk for the leading cryptocurrency.

According to the analyst, the real opportunity for a Bitcoin rally begins only when gold’s distribution phase is close to ending and capital starts rotating back into risk assets like Bitcoin. However, that process would not be a quick handoff. In his view, the transition may take months, and the full effect might not become obvious until late 2026.

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $68,796, down by 2.6% in the past 24 hours. However, recent price action shows Bitcoin beginning to outperform gold, with the BTC/Gold pair on TradingView rising by 3.68% in the past 24 hours.

BITCOIN/GOLD. Source: TradingView

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Bitcoin and most altcoins experienced a decline in value following recent geopolitical developments, with Bitcoin facing rejection at $71,000. 

Summary

Bitcoin and altcoins see sharp declines, while SIREN surges 90% in 24 hours. Ethereum, XRP, and Solana follow Bitcoin’s downward trend, losing significant value. The crypto market cap drops $200B as macroeconomic factors weigh heavily on prices. The broader cryptocurrency market, including Ethereum, XRP, and other major tokens, followed Bitcoin’s downward trend. Meanwhile, one altcoin, SIREN, managed to defy the market slump with a significant surge.

Bitcoin’s price faced significant volatility this week, with a high of $76,000 on Monday after it broke above $74,000. However, its upward momentum was short-lived, and the price quickly returned to $74,000 by Wednesday. 

Volatility spiked ahead of and after the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, with Bitcoin falling by $3,000 before the event. After the Federal Reserve decided to leave interest rates unchanged, Bitcoin briefly bounced back to $72,000. 

However, hawkish comments from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell regarding no rate reductions in 2026 led to another drop, with Bitcoin reaching a three-week low of around $68,000. Despite efforts to recover, the cryptocurrency is still struggling to regain stability.

Altcoins follow Bitcoin’s decline Ethereum has experienced a decline of over $300 since its peak of $2,400, dropping below $2,100. XRP also saw a sharp drop, rejected at $1.60, and now struggles below $1.40. Other prominent altcoins like Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Dogecoin (DOGE), Binance Coin (BNB), and Chainlink (LINK) are all down by 2-4% in the past 24 hours.

One of the worst performers in this market downturn has been HYPE, which lost almost 5% of its value and now trades around $38. ZEC (Zcash) also experienced a significant drop, shedding 7% of its value. Other altcoins such as AAVE, DOT, and SUI are down by 3-4%.

Crypto market overview | Source: Crypto Bubbles SIREN defies the market slump While the majority of the crypto market faced losses, SIREN, an AI-focused cryptocurrency operating on the BNB chain, saw a remarkable surge. The token skyrocketed by 90% in the past 24 hours, reaching a new all-time high of over $1.70. 

SIREN’s performance stands in contrast to the broader market slump, making it one of the standout performers during this period of market uncertainty.

Moreover, the total cryptocurrency market cap has taken a hit, shedding nearly $200 billion since Wednesday morning. As of the latest data, the total market cap stands at $2.43 trillion. This decline is a direct result of the drop in Bitcoin and altcoin prices, which have been influenced by both macroeconomic factors and market sentiment following the FOMC meeting.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Solana forms a cup and handle pattern while momentum stabilizes, with both charts pointing to a possible larger breakout.

Solana is showing two separate bullish chart structures, with one pointing to a possible cup and handle breakout above $500 and the other showing momentum pressure starting to ease inside a descending channel. Together, the charts suggest Solana may be building a longer term base, although neither setup has confirmed a breakout yet.

Solana Cup and Handle Chart Points to Possible $500 Breakout TargetA chart shared by Javon Marks shows Solana forming a long term cup and handle pattern on the weekly timeframe, with a projected breakout target above $500. The setup marks a rounded base that developed after Solana’s 2021 2022 decline, followed by a handle formation that appears to be taking shape during the recent pullback.

Solana Cup and Handle Pattern: Source: Javon Marks

In technical analysis, a cup and handle pattern is often viewed as a continuation structure. Here, the chart suggests Solana may be consolidating before a larger upward move. The handle sits in a descending channel, while the earlier high near the rim of the cup acts as the key breakout zone.

For now, the bullish target remains conditional. Solana still needs to break above the handle resistance and reclaim the cup rim with strong momentum before the pattern can confirm. Until then, the chart presents a bullish long term structure, but not a completed breakout.

Solana chart signals base building as momentum begins to turnA chart shared by James Easton shows Solana trading inside a descending channel after a broader recovery, while momentum indicators below the price chart suggest bearish pressure may be easing. The setup combines a rounded base structure with a consolidation phase, which often appears when an asset pauses before its next larger move.

Solana Descending Channel and Momentum Structure: Source: James Easton

Moreover, the chart’s lower panel shows momentum cycles that previously turned higher after deep negative readings. That matters because the latest setup appears to be approaching a similar zone, which may suggest selling pressure is weakening even though the broader channel still caps the price structure.

For now, the chart does not show a confirmed breakout. Instead, it shows a market still consolidating within resistance boundaries while momentum tries to stabilize. Therefore, the structure supports a cautiously bullish view over the longer term, but Solana still needs to break out of the channel before that outlook strengthens.

ENRICH your inbox with our best storiesDon’t miss out and join our newsletter to get the latest,
well-curated news from the crypto world!

Analyst, covering cryptocurrency markets, policy, and regulation. With over seven years of experience in business and marketing development, she has spent the past two years specializing in digital assets.

Read more about

Latest Solana (SOL) News Today

Bitcoin traded at $68,351 on March 22, 2026, with a market cap of around $1.36 trillion and a 24-hour volume of $20.6 billion, as price action oscillated between $68,211 and $70,978. The broader technical posture remained neutral overall, though underlying indicators and moving averages (MAs) suggested increasing downside pressure beneath the surface.

Ripple’s (XRP) price has recently slipped after a failed recovery attempt, with high-volume selling pushing the token back toward a key support level of $1.40. The token has struggled with a broader corrective phase since its peak in mid-2025, with rallies consistently failing to build momentum.

Summary

XRP’s price drops to $1.40, facing a broader corrective phase since mid-2025. Retail investors continue to support XRP, while institutional interest remains cautious. XRP’s price action depends on upcoming regulatory developments and macroeconomic conditions. XRP’s price is currently $1.40, experiencing a 3% decline over the past 24 hours. The cryptocurrency’s market cap stands at approximately $86 billion. 

Despite some short-term attempts at recovery, XRP remains trapped in a larger corrective phase. The latest pullback comes after a brief rebound in mid-March, which failed to surpass the $1.60 mark.

XRP’s price struggles are compounded by macroeconomic factors, with the Federal Reserve’s recent policy stance influencing broader market sentiment. This has led to a cautious trading environment for many cryptocurrencies, including XRP. While the asset’s technical structure shows some resilience, traders are closely monitoring whether XRP can stabilize or continue to fall within its established range.

Retail adoption and institutional caution While institutional interest in XRP remains cautious, the cryptocurrency continues to see strong support from retail investors. According to crypto analyst Egrag Crypto, XRP is currently in the retest phase of a macro ascending triangle, and the pullback in price is seen as confirmation rather than weakness. Egrag highlights a bullish long-term view, with potential price targets for XRP reaching $8, $17, and $27, provided the trendline holds.

XRP price chart | Source: Egrag Crypto/X Retail demand is becoming a key driver of XRP’s growth, with blockchain data showing a strong retail presence. Analysts are optimistic about the asset’s future potential, especially as macroeconomic factors and regulatory clarity evolve. However, skepticism remains within institutional circles, reflecting the more conservative approach from major investors.

XRP’s exchange activity signals resilience Despite recent price declines, XRP continues to show resilience, with activity on top crypto exchanges, particularly Binance, signaling sustained demand. Data from CryptoQuant shows a modest shortage of XRP reserves on Binance, dropping to $2.79 billion as of March 22. 

This suggests that traders are either holding onto their XRP or buying more, rather than selling off their holdings. XRP’s performance on exchanges indicates that the asset has not lost its appeal to investors, even amid the broader market downturn. 

Moreover, XRP’s price action will likely depend on upcoming regulatory developments and broader market conditions. Analyst X Finance Bull points out that various catalysts, including the potential passage of the CLARITY Act and growing institutional interest, could provide upward momentum for XRP. However, the asset’s performance will continue to be shaped by both retail sentiment and institutional caution, creating a complex market dynamic moving forward.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Bitcoin (BTC) markets turned risk-off as a surge in energy prices and escalating Middle East tensions raised fresh concerns about miner profitability, while U.S. regulators unveiled new guidance for crypto-related market activity. The combination of macro uncertainty, geopolitical headlines, and growing demand for downside protection in derivatives has added to short-term volatility across digital assets.

The immediate pressure point is mining. With power costs rising alongside energy benchmarks amid heightened regional instability, Bitcoin miners are facing a tighter margin environment. Analysts warn that if large operators are forced to sell treasury holdings to finance operations—particularly during periods of weaker fee revenue—BTC could face additional ‘sell-side pressure’ in spot markets. Miner-driven distribution has historically been a significant variable during stress periods, as operational expenditures are largely denominated in fiat, while revenues are primarily in BTC.

Geopolitics added another catalyst. BTC briefly fell after President Trump’s remarks tied to the Strait of Hormuz, where he warned of severe consequences if the passage was not reopened within 48 hours. The strait is a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments, and any perceived disruption risk can quickly ripple into energy prices, inflation expectations, and broader risk assets—crypto included.

Derivatives positioning suggests investors are increasingly focused on protection rather than upside exposure. VanEck said the Bitcoin options market is showing a distinctly defensive stance, with demand for downside hedges pushing put option premiums to record levels. Elevated put pricing typically reflects either rising fear of near-term drawdowns or institutional hedging activity, and it can coincide with higher implied volatility and more abrupt spot moves as dealers adjust hedges.

Beyond markets, U.S. regulators advanced the framework for crypto-linked financial activity. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) published detailed guidance for a pilot program allowing futures commission merchants (FCMs) to accept crypto as collateral. The guidelines outline capital requirements, compliance expectations, and reporting obligations—an incremental step that could expand the operational pathways for regulated intermediaries, while also raising the bar for risk controls.

In parallel, Forbes reported that joint interpretive and regulatory guidance from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the CFTC was submitted to the Federal Register, with publication scheduled for March 23, 2026 and set to take effect immediately upon release. Market participants will be watching closely for how the document delineates oversight boundaries and compliance expectations, particularly for platforms and products that sit at the intersection of securities and commodities regulation.

Internationally, Indian media reported that local police arrested CoinDCX co-founders Sumit Gupta and Neeraj Khandelwal in connection with an alleged fraud case involving a phishing website impersonating CoinDCX. The situation underscores persistent security and brand-spoofing risks facing exchanges and their users, and it may renew scrutiny around consumer protection and enforcement across major emerging markets.

On-chain monitoring also flagged suspicious flows. Analyst Eugene said the attacker behind the Venus Protocol exploit appears to have swapped stolen assets into Ethereum (ETH) and moved the funds, a pattern often associated with attempts to increase liquidity and obfuscate tracing. Such post-exploit movements can become near-term overhangs for affected tokens, depending on market depth and the attacker’s ability to exit positions.

Macro signals remain mixed. PANews cited Bank of America maintaining a medium-term view of a weaker U.S. dollar, noting that while the dollar strengthened against G10 currencies after the Iran conflict escalated, the move was not particularly large. For crypto markets, a softer dollar backdrop can be supportive over longer horizons, but near-term trading continues to be dominated by volatility shocks and geopolitical risk premiums.

Those risks intensified after Iran’s armed forces joint operations command reportedly warned that if its fuel and energy infrastructure is attacked, U.S. energy infrastructure could be designated as a target—raising the specter of broader disruptions to global energy markets. At the same time, Axios reported that the Trump administration has begun initial discussions around potential peace negotiations related to the war with Iran, suggesting diplomatic pathways are being explored even as tensions remain elevated.

For now, Bitcoin’s trajectory is being pulled by competing forces: rising operational stress for miners, defensive derivatives positioning, and a fast-moving geopolitical narrative that directly influences energy prices and system-wide risk appetite. The next phase may hinge on whether volatility cools through diplomacy—or intensifies through further escalation—while regulatory updates in Washington continue to reshape market structure in the background.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

🔎 Market Interpretation

Risk-off pivot: Bitcoin sentiment weakened as energy prices rose and Middle East tensions escalated, pushing investors toward capital preservation and short-dated hedges.

Mining margin squeeze: Higher power costs compress miner profitability, increasing the probability of BTC treasury sales to cover fiat-denominated operating expenses—potentially adding spot sell pressure.

Geopolitical-to-macro transmission: Strait of Hormuz headlines amplify oil disruption risk, which can feed inflation expectations and pressure risk assets (including crypto) through higher discount rates and volatility premiums.

Options market turns defensive: Record-high put premiums signal strong demand for downside protection; this can raise implied volatility and contribute to sharper spot moves due to dealer hedging (gamma effects).

Regulatory structure firms up: CFTC guidance on accepting crypto collateral via an FCM pilot program suggests incremental normalization for regulated intermediaries—paired with stronger capital, compliance, and reporting constraints.

Security and exploit overhangs: India exchange-related arrests and alleged Venus exploit fund movements into ETH highlight persistent operational/security risks that can weigh on affected assets and sector narrative.

Dollar backdrop vs. shock trading: Bank of America’s medium-term weaker-USD view could be constructive for crypto over time, but near-term price action is dominated by geopolitics-driven volatility spikes.

💡 Strategic Points

Monitor miner stress indicators: Track hashprice, mining difficulty, energy benchmarks, and miner reserve/flow data; rising exchange inflows from miner-linked wallets can foreshadow spot pressure.

Read options skew as sentiment: Elevated put premiums and skew imply market participants are paying up for crash protection—useful as a stress gauge even if spot remains range-bound.

Expect volatility around oil/war headlines: Crypto may react as a high-beta risk asset when oil shocks lift inflation fears; position sizing and stop/hedge planning matter more than directional conviction.

Hedging toolkit considerations: Protective puts, put spreads, or collars may be preferred when put IV is expensive; alternatively, reduce leverage and keep dry powder for dislocations.

Regulatory change as a market-structure catalyst: The CFTC collateral pilot could expand institutional workflows, but stricter risk controls may concentrate activity among well-capitalized intermediaries.

Compliance watch: Upcoming SEC/CFTC interpretive guidance (effective upon publication) may alter classification and oversight expectations for hybrid products—review exposure to venues and instruments at the securities/commodities boundary.

Security risk management: Phishing/brand spoofing cases reinforce the need for verified domains, withdrawal allowlists, hardware keys, and cautious link hygiene—especially during high-volatility news cycles.

Exploit-flow vigilance: Large swaps into ETH and subsequent transfers can signal laundering/exit attempts; affected tokens may face episodic sell pressure when liquidity windows open.

📘 Glossary

Risk-off: A market regime where investors reduce exposure to volatile assets and prefer cash, government bonds, or defensive positioning.

Miner profitability / margin: The spread between mining revenue (block subsidy + fees) and costs (primarily electricity, hardware, hosting).

Sell-side pressure: Downward price force created when large holders (e.g., miners) sell assets into the market to raise cash.

Options put premium: The price paid for a put option, which grants the right to sell an asset at a set price; rising premiums often reflect higher fear/volatility.

Downside hedge: A strategy intended to limit losses if the underlying asset declines (e.g., buying puts, constructing put spreads).

Implied volatility (IV): The market’s expectation of future price variability embedded in option prices.

Dealer hedging / gamma effects: Market-makers adjusting spot exposure as price moves to stay hedged; can amplify intraday swings when options positioning is large.

FCM (Futures Commission Merchant): A regulated intermediary that accepts orders and funds to trade futures/derivatives on behalf of clients.

Collateral: Assets posted to secure obligations in trading (e.g., margin for derivatives positions).

Federal Register: The U.S. government’s official journal for publishing agency rules and guidance.

Phishing / brand spoofing: Fraud that impersonates a trusted entity to steal credentials or funds (often via lookalike websites).

On-chain flows: Observable blockchain transactions used to infer wallet behavior, exchange inflows/outflows, and potential risk events.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Bitcoin maintains a prolonged negative correlation with the S&P 500, marking its longest decoupling phase since 2020. Earlier, in October, BTC reversed sharply, dropping from around $30,000 while equities continued climbing toward 5,000.

In fact, this divergence followed a major liquidation event, where roughly 70,000 BTC in Open Interest was wiped out in a single session, resetting positioning back to April 2025 levels.

Source: Darkfost/ X Since then, Bitcoin [BTC] has continued trending downward under geopolitical pressure and tightening liquidity conditions. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 held its structure for months before recently rolling over from its highs.

As this shift unfolds, sentiment across both markets now converges into extreme fear levels.

In turn, this alignment indicates that even after being separate for a long time, the overall economic conditions are starting to come together again, hinting at a possible shift towards a shared cautious approach in both crypto and traditional markets.

Macro pressure drives synchronized extreme fear across crypto and equities The simultaneous drop in both sentiment gauges points to a broader macro reset, not isolated weakness in either market. The S&P 500 Fear and Greed Index has fallen to 16 as equities retreat from roughly $7,500.

Source: Joao Wedson/ X At the same time, Bitcoin’s reading has dropped further to around 12, while BTC pulls back from above $100,000. In fact, this alignment is rare, as crypto and equities usually price fear at different stages.

Source: Joao Wedson/ X Earlier, Bitcoin showed relative resilience.

As Nic Puckrin, Co-Founder of Coin Bureau, told AMBCrypto via email,

Bitcoin had risen about 8% during geopolitical stress even as equities declined.

However, that divergence is now fading. As both markets converge into extreme fear, investors appear to be de-risking broadly, which signals tightening liquidity and macro conditions beginning to dominate price behavior across both asset classes simultaneously.

From leverage flush to flow-driven Bitcoin price action Bitcoin’s open interest expansion into October explains the earlier divergence from equities, as leverage rose toward $45 billion while price approached $120,000.

However, this structure relied on aggressive derivatives exposure.

In fact, the 10–11 October liquidation erased roughly 70,000 BTC, driving Open Interest down toward $30 billion and resetting market risk capacity.

Source: CryptoQuant As this unwind unfolded, the price dropped toward $90,000, showing how much demand had been leverage-driven rather than spot-based.

Meanwhile, Open Interest sat at $21.8 billion at press time, which reflects more defensive positioning. This shift implies the market has transitioned from speculative expansion to capital preservation.

At the same time, lower leverage reduces cascade risk, yet it also weakens trend strength. As a result, price becomes more sensitive to real inflows, meaning any sustained move now requires genuine capital, not leverage-driven momentum.

Final Summary Bitcoin [BTC] and the S&P 500 convergence into extreme fear signals macro-driven risk-off as liquidity tightens across both markets. Bitcoin deleveraging weakens momentum while the S&P 500 rolls over, which shifts both markets toward dependence on real capital flows.

Resolv Labs moved Sunday to reassure users after an exploit hit the issuance mechanics of its USR stablecoin, knocking the token off its dollar peg and prompting decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols with exposure to move quickly to contain any fallout.

Cointelegraph reported earlier Sunday that an attacker exploited USR’s minting mechanics, creating tens of millions of unbacked tokens and dumping them through DeFi pools, which broke the stablecoin’s peg and prompted Resolv to pause protocol functions as it assessed the damage.

The token dropped as low as $0.14 (86% below its intended $1 price) after the exploit before rebounding to $0.42 at the time of writing, according to data from CoinGecko.

In a recent statement on X, the Resolv team said that the collateral pool “remains fully intact,” and that the problem appears “isolated to USR issuance mechanics.” Containment and impact assessment remain ongoing.

Onchain data from Arkham, corroborated by Web3 security firm Cyvers, showed that the attacker had converted most of the minted USR into Ether (ETH), selling part of the haul for about 11,400 ETH (around $24 million). Independent analysts also noted that the remaining 36.74 million USR was “still being continuously dumped.”

USR dropped 86% off its peg. Source. CoinGeckoMichael Pearl, vice president GTM and strategy at Cyvers, told Cointelegraph that since the supply had inflated faster than the market could absorb and the token had immediately depegged, the value of the remaining tokens was significantly impaired.

DeFi protocols move to contain falloutDecentralized finance (DeFi) protocols with exposure to Resolv raced to clarify their positions. Liquid staking provider Lido said that Lido Earn user funds were safe. Morpho cofounder Merlin Egalite emphasized that the lending protocol’s own contracts were unaffected and that only certain vaults had exposure, and Aave’s founder, Stani Kulechov, said that the platform had no direct USR exposure and that Resolv was repaying its outstanding debt.

The X account “yieldsandmore” pointed to potential losses in Resolv’s junior RLP tranche, highlighting possible knock-on effects for yield platforms such as Stream and yoUSD that used RLP as collateral. 

Pearl told Cointelegraph that, based on available data, the exposure appeared to be “relatively concentrated” in lending markets and leverage loops “rather than system-wide,” and primarily in protocols that integrated USR, wstUSR, or RLP into lending, leverage or yield strategies.

He said that several protocols, such as Euler, Venus, Lista and Fluid, had taken precautionary actions such as pausing markets or isolating vaults, while others had declared no exposure at all. “It is more accurate to describe the risk as concentrated with localized spillover, rather than widespread contagion,” he said.

Ledger chief technical officer Charles Guillemet also assessed the fallout on X, stating that, due to the relatively small size of USR, “this is not a Terra Luna-type event.”

Questions around limitations of security auditsResolv’s smart contracts have undergone multiple audits since 2024, but Pearl said that, while audits were “necessary,” they were also “inherently static and scoped.” Real-time, artificial intelligence-powered monitoring to “continuously analyze protocol activity” was needed, he argued, to detect anomalies as they emerge.

For stablecoin systems specifically, he said that meant monitoring mint and burn flows against expected behavior in real time, continuously validating supply against reserves and backing assets, and detecting anomalies in oracle inputs, pricing and liquidity conditions. 

Security firm Pashov, which audited Resolv’s staking module in July 2025, told Cointelegraph that Resolv’s design was “good,” and that the root cause was “not the design so much as the private key compromise,” which was likely an operational security flaw. “We have to understand how that happens,” he said.

Cointelegraph reached out to Resolv Labs for comment but had not received a response by publication.

AI Eye: IronClaw rivals OpenClaw, Olas launches bots for Polymarket

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In BlackRock TCP To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in BlackRock TCP between November 6, 2024 and January 23, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. ("BlackRock TCP" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: TCPC) and reminds investors of the April 6, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company's investments were not being timely and/or appropriately valued; (2) the Company's efforts at portfolio restructuring were not effectively resolving challenged credits or improving the quality of the portfolio; (3) as a result, the Company's unrealized losses were understated; (4) as a result, the Company's NAV was overstated; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On February 27, 2025, before the market opened, the Company issued a press release announcing financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2024. The press release disclosed that the Company's portfolio had significantly weakened during the 2024 fiscal year. Specifically, the press release revealed the number of portfolio companies on non-accrual status had more than doubled, and as a result, debt investments on non-accrual status at cost increased by 289% (from 3.7% to 14.4% of the portfolio). Moreover, the press release revealed that the Company's net asset value ("NAV") had fallen 22.44% year over year to $9.23 per share. Total losses, both realized and unrealized, were revealed to have ballooned to $194,895,042 for the fiscal year, a 186% increase year over year, in large part due to a newly added $72.3 million net unrealized loss within the fourth quarter. Despite this, the press release alleged the NAV of the Company was accurate at $9.23 per share, and that "the vast majority of [the Company's] portfolio continued to perform well," and the Company was "working closely with [its] borrowers and sponsors to resolve the portfolio issues."

On this news, the Company's stock price fell $0.90, or 9.64%, to close at $8.44 per share on February 27, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.

On January 23, 2026, after market hours, BlackRock TCP disclosed certain fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results, including that the Company's NAV per share as of December 31, 2025 was in fact in the range of $7.05 to $7.09, 19% less than reported the prior quarter and 23.4% less than reported the prior year.

On this news, BlackRock TCP's stock price fell $0.76, or 12.97%, to close at $5.10 per share on January 26, 2026, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding BlackRock TCP's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the BlackRock TCP class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/TCPC or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Eos Energy To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Eos Energy between November 5, 2025 and February 26, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. ("Eos Energy" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: EOSE) and reminds investors of the May 5, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company was unable to achieve the ramp in production and capacity utilization required to achieve its previously set guidance; (2) the Company's battery line downtime was running well above industry norms, the design intent of the line, and internal forecasts; (3) the Company was experiencing delays in the ability for its automated bipolar production to hit quality targets; (4) the Company's inadequate systems and processes prevented it from ensuring reasonably accurate guidance and that its public disclosures were timely, accurate, and complete; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On February 26, 2026, Eos Energy announced fourth quarter and full year 2025 results, reporting, among other things, full year 2025 revenue of $114.2 million, falling far short of the Company's previously issued guidance of $150 to $160 million. Management attributed these results to, in part, that "battery line downtime ran well above industry norms" and "the ability for the automated bipolar production to hit quality targets took longer than expected." The Company further disclosed it had "uncovered inefficiencies that result in longer end-to-end production times."

On this news, Eos Energy's stock price fell $4.39, or 39.4%, to close at $6.74 per share on February 26, 2026, thereby injuring investors.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Eos Energy's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Eos Energy Enterprises class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/EOSE or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

14.81K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 22, 2026) - Homerun Resources Inc. (TSXV: HMR) (OTCQB: HMRFF) ("Homerun" or the "Company") announces that Homerun's CEO, Brian Leeners, will participate in the upcoming Water Tower Research Fireside Chat Series taking place on March 24, 2026 at 3:00 PM EST.

The Fireside Chat will be hosted by Dmitry Silverstyn, Managing Director at Water Tower Research and topics to be discussed will include:

The importance of consolidating the Santa Maria Eterna silica sand district.The significance of independent validation of the suitability of HMRFF's silica resource for antimony-free solar glass production.The implications of the successful UCD Bench trials for silicon carbide and fused silica glass production.How all of the above fit into HMRFF's progress toward a bankable feasibility study and solar glass manufacturing.The latest developments in offtake agreements and strategic partnerships.The outlook and milestones to consider in 2026.REGISTRATION
This event is open access for all investors to participate. Interested parties can register for the event through Water Tower Research at:

EVENT REGISTRATION

Homerun will also be participating in the Water Tower Research Insights Conference on April 14-15, 2026. This virtual event provides direct access to management teams and deeper insights into innovative companies across WTR's nine sectors through fireside chat conversations and curated post-event engagement. Click the save the date link below for additional details.

SAVE THE DATE

About Homerun (www.homerunresources.com / www.homerunenergy.com)
Homerun is building the silica-powered backbone of the energy transition across four focused verticals: Silica, Solar, Energy Storage, and Energy Solutions. Anchored by a unique high-purity low-iron silica resource in Bahia, Brazil, Homerun transforms raw silica into essential products and technologies that accelerate clean power adoption and deliver durable shareholder value.

⁠Silica: Secure supply and processing of high-purity low-iron silica for mission-critical applications, enabling premium solar glass and advanced energy materials.Solar: Development of Latin America's first dedicated 1,000 tonne per day high-efficiency solar glass plant and the commercialization of antimony-free solar glass designed for next-generation photovoltaic performance.Energy Storage: Advancement of long-duration, silica-based thermal storage systems and related technologies to decarbonize industrial heat and unlock grid flexibility.⁠Energy Solutions: AI-enabled energy management, control systems, and turnkey electrification solutions that reduce costs and optimize renewable generation for commercial and industrial customers.With disciplined execution, strategic partnerships, and an unwavering commitment to best-in-class ESG practices, Homerun is focused on converting milestones into markets-creating a scalable, vertically integrated platform for clean energy manufacturing in the Americas.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of
Homerun Resources Inc.

"Brian Leeners"

FOR THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE
The information contained herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements relate to information that is based on assumptions of management, forecasts of future results, and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. Any statements that express predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking statements".

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289439

Source: Homerun Resources Inc.

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© Andrew Angelov / Shutterstock.com

A 14% yield sounds like a solution to almost every income investor’s problem. For retirees bridging the gap between Social Security and living expenses, for dividend reinvestors compounding monthly checks, and for anyone frustrated by the 4% returns on savings accounts, Trinity Capital (NASDAQ:TRIN) looks like the answer. But the title says “roller coaster” for a reason, and understanding why requires looking past the yield.

An image representing the growth and financial aspects of Business Development Companies (BDCs) within a professional office environment. What Trinity Capital Actually Does Trinity Capital is a Business Development Company, which is a type of regulated investment vehicle that lends to companies too small or risky for traditional bank financing. Trinity’s specific niche is venture lending: providing debt capital to growth-stage, often venture-backed companies that need equipment financing, working capital, or expansion loans. These borrowers pay high interest rates because they carry real credit risk, and Trinity passes most of that income to shareholders as dividends.

The return engine is straightforward. About 85% of the portfolio is in first-lien loans, with 82.9% of debt carrying floating rates. When rates were high, that floating-rate exposure was a significant tailwind. The effective yield on average debt investments ran at 15.2% in Q4 2025, down from 16.4% a year earlier, a direct consequence of the Fed cutting rates by 75 basis points from September 2025 to the current 3.75%. Yield compression is the core rate risk here, and it is ongoing.

Does the Income Actually Hold Up? For income investors, the most important question is whether the dividend is covered. Trinity’s answer has been consistent: net investment income covered the dividend at 102% in both Q4 and Q1 2025. The company also carries a meaningful cushion, with $68.7 million ($0.84 per share) in undistributed earnings spillover as of December 31, 2025. That buffer can absorb short-term stress without forcing a dividend cut.

The transition to monthly payments starting January 2026 was well-received in income communities — a Reddit post in r/dividendinvesting titled “Trinity Capital makes the move to Monthly Dividend Payments” drew significant engagement from income-focused investors. At the current share price of $14.64, the $0.17 monthly dividend annualizes to roughly a 14% forward yield, making the cadence change more than cosmetic: it puts cash in investors’ hands more frequently and reinforces the income thesis.

The Tradeoffs Income Investors Need to Understand The first tradeoff is credit risk that is genuinely different from most income vehicles. Venture-backed borrowers are not blue-chip companies. Trinity recorded $64.3 million in net realized losses for full-year 2025, and watch-list investments climbed to 5.3% of the portfolio in Q2 2025, up from 3.0%. Realized losses are a normal cost of venture lending, but they do erode NAV over time if not offset by new originations and appreciation.

The second tradeoff is share dilution. Trinity funds growth partly by issuing new equity through its ATM program. The basic weighted average share count grew from 59.4 million to 77.0 million year-over-year in Q4 2025, which is why NII per share stayed flat even as total NII grew. Investors in a growing BDC are constantly sharing the income pie with new shareholders.

The third tradeoff is price volatility that defies the “stable income” narrative. The 52-week range spans from $10.90 to $16.82, a swing of more than 50% from trough to peak. Shares are up about 8.6% over the past year but have moved sharply in both directions during that period. Investors collecting a 14% yield while watching principal fluctuate 20-30% need to be emotionally and financially prepared for that reality.

Trinity Capital carries characteristics that income investors should weigh carefully: venture credit risk, meaningful price swings, and a yield that reflects those risks. The 14% yield in venture lending comes with a different risk profile than traditional fixed-income instruments.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Beyond Meat To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Beyond Meat between February 27, 2025 and November 11, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Beyond Meat, Inc. ("Beyond Meat" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BYND) and reminds investors of the March 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the book value of certain of Beyond Meat's long-lived assets exceeded their fair value, making it highly likely that the Company would be required to record a material, non-cash impairment charge; (2) the foregoing was likely to impair Beyond Meat's ability to timely file its periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); and (3) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On November 3, 2025, during pre-market hours, Beyond Meat issued a press release announcing that it would delay reporting its financial results for Q3 2025, citing the need for additional time to complete its impairment review.

On this news, Beyond Meat's stock price fell $0.265 per share, or 16.01%, to close at $1.39 per share on November 3, 2025.

On November 10, 2025, during post-market hours, Beyond Meat issued a press release announcing its financial results for Q3 2025. Among other results, Beyond Meat reported that its loss from operations for the quarter was $112.3 million, which included "$77.4 million in non-cash impairment charges related to certain of the Company's long-lived assets." (Emphasis added.)

On this news, Beyond Meat's stock price fell $0.12 per share, or 8.96%, to close at $1.22 per share on November 11, 2025.

Then, on November 11, 2025, during post-market hours, Beyond Meat hosted a conference call with investors and analysts to discuss its financial results for Q3 2025. During the call, the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Defendant Lubi Kutua disclosed, in relevant part, that "[t]he total impairment amount of $77.4 million was . . . allocated to PP&E, operating lease ROU assets and prepaid lease costs on our balance sheet."

On this news, Beyond Meat's stock price fell an additional $0.105 per share, or 8.61%, to close at $1.115 per share on November 12, 2025.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Beyond Meat's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Beyond Meat class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/BYND or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Inovio To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Inovio between October 10, 2023 and December 26, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Inovio" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: INO) and reminds investors of the April 7, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) manufacturing for Inovio's CELLECTRA device was deficient; (2) accordingly, Inovio was unlikely to submit the INO-3107 BLA to the FDA by the second half of 2024; (3) Inovio had insufficient information to justify the INO-3107 BLA's eligibility for FDA accelerated approval or priority review; (4) accordingly, INO-3107's overall regulatory and commercial prospects were overstated; and (5) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On December 29, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") announced it had accepted Inovio's Biologics License Application ("BLA") for INO-3107, a treatment for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, on a standard review timeline. Inovio filed its BLA under the accelerated approval pathway, but the FDA stated that the Company did not submit adequate information to justify eligibility for accelerated approval. Inovio also announced it does not currently plan to seek approval under the standard review timeline, and will request a meeting with the FDA to discuss how it may still pursue accelerated approval.

On this news, Inovio's stock price fell $0.56 per share, or 24.45%, to close at $1.73 per share on December 29, 2025.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Inovio's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Inovio Pharmaceuticals class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/INO or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Navan To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Navan pursuant to and/or traceable to the Company's Registration Statement and Prospectus (collectively, the "Offering Documents") issued in connection with the Company's IPO, on or about October 30, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Navan, Inc. ("Navan" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: NAVN) and reminds investors of the April 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: the Offering Documents used to effectuate Navan's IPO were false and misleading and omitted to state that, at the time of the offering, the Company had increased its "sales and marketing" expenses.

As the truth about the Company's business reached the market, the value of its shares declined dramatically, causing Navan investors to suffer significant damages. By the commencement of the action, Navan's shares traded as low as $9.01 per share, representing a decline of over 60% from the Offering Price.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Navan's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Navan class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/NAVN or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Plug Power To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Plug Power between January 17, 2025 and November 13, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Plug Power Inc. ("Plug Power" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PLUG) and reminds investors of the April 3, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (i) Defendants had materially overstated the likelihood that funds attributed to the DOE Loan would ultimately become available to Plug Power, and/or that Plug Power would ultimately construct the hydrogen production facilities necessary to receive those funds; (ii) as such, Plug Power was likely to pivot toward more modest projects with less commercial upside; and (iii) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On October 7, 2025, Plug Power issued a press release and filed a current report on Form 8-K with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announcing that Defendant Andrew Marsh would step down from his role as the Company's Chief Executive Officer, "effective as of the date [Plug Power] files its [2025] Annual Report", and that Sanjay Shrestha would step down from his role as the Company's President, "effective as of October 10, 2025[.]" Plug Power concurrently announced the appointment of Chief Revenue Officer Jose Luis Crespo to both roles. The abrupt departure of two key executives just one month before the expected issuance of Plug Power's financial and operating results for the third quarter plainly did not bode well for the Company.

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.26 per share, or 6.29%, to close at $3.87 per share later that day.

Then, on November 10, 2025, Plug Power issued a press release reporting its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, and filed a quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC that reported the same. That same day, Plug Power held a related conference call to discuss those results. During the call, Defendants announced that they expected to generate more than $275 million in liquidity after signing a nonbinding letter of intent to monetize their electricity rights in New York and one other location in partnership with a major U.S. data center developer, and that "[a]s a result, we have suspended activities under the DOE loan program, allowing us to redeploy capital". This represented a significant pivot for Plug Power. Defendants had not previously discussed the possibility of suspending activities under the DOE Loan and during the Class Period, and, just eight months earlier, had specifically advised analysts that they should "not expect revenue from that segment [i.e., data center power generation] of any size over the next two to three years".

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.09 per share, or 3.39%, to close at $2.53 per share on November 11, 2025.

Then, during market hours on November 13, 2025, The Washington Examiner reported that Plug Power "confirmed . . . that it suspended activities" on "its plans to construct six facilities to produce and liquefy zero or low-carbon hydrogen, putting at risk" the $1.66 billion DOE Loan it closed in January.

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.48 per share, or 17.58%, over the following two trading sessions, to close at $2.25 per share on November 14, 2025.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Plug Power's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Plug Power class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/PLUG or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Kyndryl To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Kyndryl between August 1, 2024 and February 9, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. ("Kyndryl" or the "Company") (NYSE: KD) and reminds investors of the April 13, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Kyndryl's financial statements issued during the Class Period were materially misstated; (2) Kyndryl lacked adequate internal controls and at times materially understated issues with its internal controls; (3) as a result, Kyndryl would be unable to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2025; and (4) as a result, defendants' statements about Kyndryl's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times.

On February 9, 2026, Kyndryl disclosed in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that its Audit Committee is reviewing the Company's cash management practices, related disclosures (including regarding the drivers of the Company's adjusted free cash flow metric), and the efficacy of its internal control over financial reporting following the Company's receipt of voluntary document requests from the SEC's Division of Enforcement.

Kyndryl further disclosed that it expects to report material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting for multiple reporting periods. The Company also stated that its previously issued assessment of internal control over financial reporting and its independent auditor's opinion included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 should no longer be relied upon.

In addition, Kyndryl announced the immediate departures of its Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and filed a Form NT 10-Q indicating that it would delay the filing of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Following these disclosures, Kyndryl's stock price declined approximately 50% on February 9, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. 

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Kyndryl's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Kyndryl class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/KD or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

14.35K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 22, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: DRVN) between May 9, 2023 and February 24, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 8, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Driven Brands common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Driven Brands class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18662 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 8, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose Driven Brands' financial condition and the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting through a series of inaccurate financial reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") from May 9, 2023, to November 5, 2025. Among many other errors, Driven Brands' balance sheets contained an unreconciled cash balance originating in 2023 which resulted in revenue and cash being overstated in 2023 and 2024, and operating expenses being understated over the same period. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Driven Brands class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18662 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289407

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 22, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers Class A common stock of Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) between June 27, 2023 and the close of the market on February 28, 2024 (4:00 p.m. ET), inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 27, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Snowflake Class A common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Snowflake class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=22950 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 27, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants repeatedly made positive statements about the state of its business, including positive statements about customer usage of, and new developments for, its products. At the same time, defendants failed to disclose that: (1) product efficiency gains, Iceberg Tables and tiered storage pricing were expected to have a material negative impact on consumption and revenues, and (2) as a result, defendants' positive statements about consumption patterns, revenues, and demand for Snowflake products lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Snowflake class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=22950 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289412

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Realty Income's (O 2.70%) pandemic bounce ended when the market experienced one of the most profound interest rate shocks in history. Even though it recovered some of its lost value over the last couple of years, it has pulled back now that the prospects for further interest rate cuts have dimmed.

However, instead of selling the stock, now may be the time to stay the course in the monthly dividend company. Here's why.

Image source: Getty Images.

Realty Income's current state Realty Income owns more than 15,500 single-tenant, net leased properties. Investors tend to like such arrangements, as tenants cover the insurance, maintenance, and tax expenses, giving the company a steady revenue stream.

Moreover, it tends to attract blue chip clients such as Dollar General, Wynn Resorts, and Tractor Supply, providing for a stable client base. Clients like these also keep its occupancy level at almost 99%. Also, interest rates did not stop it from making nearly $6.3 billion in additional property investments in 2025, and it is hitting the accelerator this year.

Additionally, Realty Income seems to be getting favorable loan terms. In 2025, the company issued convertible senior notes with rates ranging from 3.375% to 5.125%, showing that low-cost capital continues to fund its expansion.

Today's Change

(

-2.70

%) $

-1.69

Current Price

$

60.95

Realty Income by the numbers Not surprisingly, that led to $5.75 billion in revenue in 2025, a 9% yearly increase. Although interest costs rose by almost 12%, Realty Income largely held the line on rising costs and expenses. Hence, the $1.06 billion in net income attributable to the company was 23% higher than year-ago levels.

Still, because it is a real estate investment trust (REIT), funds from operations (FFO) income is arguably the more critical metric. FFO income does not deduct charges like depreciation and amortization, providing a clearer picture of the cash it generates. In Realty Income's case, that came to $3.89 billion in 2025, or $4.25 per diluted share.

Admittedly, that would probably be higher if interest rates were lower. Still, it is enough for the monthly dividend company to cover its nearly $3.25 per share in annual payouts. That yields a 5.1% cash return at current prices, far above the S&P 500's (^GSPC 1.51%) 1.2% average dividend yield.

Furthermore, Realty Income is not as expensive as it appears. Its 54 P/E ratio may appear pricey. Nonetheless, when measured against FFO income, its price-to-FFO ratio is only about 15, making the REIT look like a bargain that many investors have missed.

Stick with Realty Income Despite interest rates remaining steady, investors should continue investing in Realty Income.

Admittedly, Realty Income would probably earn higher profits with lower interest rates. However, the company has a steady client base and can easily bankroll its dividend and grow its portfolio under current business conditions.

By staying in the stock, investors earn a generous return on the payout and, at least from an FFO income perspective, can buy more shares at a low valuation. Thus, if share prices pull back further, investors should treat it as a buying opportunity and collect dividends while they wait for the stock price to recover.

8.17K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

36.82K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

The energy sector can be volatile. We've seen that in the past year. Crude oil prices slumped last year before going hyperbolic in 2026 due to the war with Iran.

However, despite energy price volatility, the sector can still be a great place to generate reliable dividend income. Here are three top energy dividend stocks to buy for durable income in 2026 and beyond.

Image source: Getty Images.

Brookfield Renewable Brookfield Renewable (BEPC 4.21%)(BEP 3.26%) has been a very reliable dividend stock since its public market listing in 2011. The leading global renewable energy producer has increased its dividend by at least 5% each year since going public. The payout currently yields nearly 4%, several times more than the S&P 500's 1.2% dividend yield.

The top renewable energy dividend stock expects to increase its high-yielding payout by 5% to 9% annually over the long term. Several factors support that view. Brookfield Renewable generates stable and growing cash flow. It has contracted 90% of its capacity under long-term, fixed-rate power purchase agreements, the bulk of which link rates to inflation (70% of its revenues). Brookfield is also investing heavily to continue expanding its portfolio to support surging demand for renewable energy. The company expects to grow its funds from operations per share by more than 10% annually through at least 2031, easily supporting its dividend growth plan.

Today's Change

(

-4.21

%) $

-1.70

Current Price

$

38.67

ExxonMobil ExxonMobil (XOM +0.95%) is one of the world's best dividend payers. The global oil and gas giant paid $17.2 billion in dividends last year, the second most among S&P 500 members. Meanwhile, Exxon has increased its dividend for an oil sector-leading 43 consecutive years.

ExxonMobil has weathered the ups and downs of the oil sector better than anyone else over the years. That's due to its large-scale operations and integrated business model. Its scale advantages lower costs while its integration enables it to maximize every molecule of oil and gas it produces. Exxon also has a fortress balance sheet, giving it the flexibility to continue investing during periods of lower oil prices.

Today's Change

(

0.95

%) $

1.51

Current Price

$

159.67

The oil giant recently raised its 2030 plan. It now anticipates producing an additional $25 billion in annual earnings and $35 billion in cash flow by 2030, at constant oil prices and margins relative to 2024 levels. Exxon expects to achieve this robust earnings growth by continuing its strategy of investing heavily in its advantaged resource portfolio (its lowest-cost, highest-margin assets). The company also plans to continue leveraging its scale advantages to deliver meaningful structural cost savings. Exxon's strategy positions it to deliver $145 billion of cumulative surplus cash over the next five years at $65 oil, supporting its ability to continue growing its dividend, which currently yields over 2.5%.

Enterprise Products Partners Enterprise Products Partners (EPD +0.31%) has been a very reliable income investment over the decades. The master limited partnership (MLP) has increased its distribution for 27 straight years. The energy midstream company currently offers a monster yield of 5.9%.

Today's Change

(

0.31

%) $

0.12

Current Price

$

37.56

The MLP generates very stable cash flows to support its high-yielding distribution. Long-term, fee-based contracts and government-regulated rate structures underpin the bulk of its assets. Enterprise Products Partners produced enough stable cash flow to cover its lofty distribution by a comfortable 1.7 times last year. It also has the best balance sheet in the energy midstream sector. That provides it with the financial flexibility to continue investing in growing its operations.

Enterprise Products Partners completed $6 billion of expansion projects in the second half of last year, which will boost its cash flow this year. Meanwhile, it has another $4.8 billion of expansions it expects to complete over the next two years. These growth projects will give the MLP more fuel to continue increasing its high-yielding payout.

Reliable dividend income in 2026 and beyond Brookfield Renewable, ExxonMobil, and Enterprise Products Partners pay some of the most bankable dividends in the energy sector. They have reliably delivered dividend increases over the years, and this trend should continue. That makes them ideal dividend stocks to buy this year for durable dividend income.

Matt DiLallo has positions in Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Renewable Partners, and Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Renewable, Brookfield Renewable Partners, and Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.