Market Signal Briefing

The crypto markets were deeply affected by U.S. President Donald Trump’s comments over the weekend. On Saturday, the 21st of March, Bitcoin [BTC] plunged below the $68k level after spending nearly two weeks above it.

As a result, the altcoin market also faced losses. Select altcoins showed notable relative strength against the market, and World Liberty Financial [WLFI] was one of them. In the past 24 hours, it has gained 2% in value while BTC dropped by 3.22%.

Is it time to buy WLFI? Source: WLFI/USDT on TradingView Maybe day traders can look into it, but not for long-term investors. The price action on the 1-day chart was severely bearish despite the past three days’ gains. The $0.095-$0.10 support, which WLFI has traded above since February, was breached on Thursday, the 19th of March.

At the time of writing, this supply zone was being retested as resistance. Like WLFI’s price action, the volume indicators were unanimously bearish. The OBV and the A/D maintained their downtrend to show that selling pressure remained prevalent.

The CMF was below -0.05 to suggest capital outflows were dominant. The demand was fleeting and simply not enough to reverse the downtrend in play.

What can WLFI traders expect next week? Source: WLFI/USDT on TradingView The World Liberty Financial token reached the 23.6% extension level at $0.0885 on Friday, the 20th of March. The RSI on the H4 chart recovered to neutral 50 and is poised to fall lower alongside the price.

The importance of the $0.095-$0.10 supply zone has already been highlighted. Traders can be prepared for a rejection from this area and a bearish continuation.

Bitcoin was trading at a key support and could see a price bounce back above $70k. This can give altcoins some short-term strength and can spur WLFI to climb above $0.10.

Traders should remember the bearish swing structure of the altcoin. A break of $0.107 is needed to flip the H4 structure bullishly. Until then, traders and investors can maintain a bearish bias.

Final Summary World Liberty Financial token saw some short-term gains, but the longer-term trend was bearish. The $0.095-$0.10 is a key supply zone, and $0.107 needs to be breached to flip the price structure bullishly. 

The first months of 2026 have pushed Ethereum into a period of deep reflection — not just about price or upgrades, but about the network's fundamental identity and long-term direction.

For years, Ethereum's growth strategy centered on invisibility. The idea was simple: institutions, neobanks, and developers would build on top of it, quietly onboarding millions of users who would never need to understand wallets or gas fees. Layer-2 networks helped drive that vision forward by processing transactions off-chain and settling them back onto the main blockchain, dramatically reducing costs and improving speed.

But Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin challenged that optimism early this year with a pointed warning to the ecosystem: many Layer-2 designs are drifting away from Ethereum's core principles. Centralized components, fragmented environments, and inconsistent security models risk undermining the decentralization and neutrality that make Ethereum valuable in the first place. Analysts at 21shares predict that 2026 will trigger significant Layer-2 consolidation, favoring networks that stay aligned with Ethereum's foundational values.

Beyond scaling, quantum computing has moved from theoretical threat to active concern. The Ethereum Foundation has begun prioritizing post-quantum cryptography research, integrating security initiatives like LeanVM into near-term development plans rather than treating them as distant problems.

Leadership changes at the foundation, including the unexpected departure of co-executive director Tomasz Stańczak, suggest a broader internal realignment is underway as the organization recalibrates its priorities.

Perhaps most ambitiously, Buterin has positioned Ethereum as a potential trust layer for decentralized artificial intelligence — enabling verifiable AI outputs, autonomous agent coordination, and machine-to-machine economic activity without centralized oversight.

The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade will serve as a critical test of whether Ethereum can address these converging pressures and cement its role as a secure, scalable foundation for the next generation of digital infrastructure.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

XRP's current market structure raises a critical question among crypto investors: could the token actually fall below the psychologically significant $1 mark? While it remains a possibility rather than a certainty, the bearish signals are hard to ignore.

From a technical standpoint, XRP continues trading in a prolonged downtrend, repeatedly forming lower highs and struggling to hold above key moving averages. The 50-day EMA has consistently acted as dynamic resistance, keeping bullish momentum in check and reinforcing seller control over price action.

One of the more telling developments is XRP's reliance on a short-term ascending trendline for support. Should that trendline break convincingly, the structure shifts from a weak consolidation phase into a full downtrend continuation. At that point, lower support zones come into play, and the $1 level moves from an abstract concern to a realistic target.

Markets rarely treat round numbers as guaranteed support floors. If selling pressure intensifies, liquidity thins out, and broader market sentiment turns more negative — particularly if Bitcoin continues declining — XRP could face significant downside. A sub-$1 scenario becomes considerably more plausible under those combined conditions.

That said, context is everything. The $1 zone carries both psychological and historical weight for XRP, making it a level where strong buyer interest is likely to emerge. On-chain metrics and sustained network usage also provide a foundational layer of demand that could slow or absorb downward pressure before a breakdown becomes critical.

XRP is not in free fall. It sits in a fragile, pressure-tested structure that could resolve in either direction. A sustained break below current support levels would meaningfully increase the probability of a move toward $1, but that outcome likely requires both technical deterioration and broader macroeconomic weakness occurring simultaneously.

The $1 level isn't inevitable — but it's not off the table either.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iran's power plants if the Strait of Hormuz isn't cleared for shipping traffic.

Nvidia (NVDA 3.17%) is at a unique point in history. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers, Nvidia has transformed into a new company since 2023, and each year, the same trend happens with the stock.

At the start of the year, Nvidia tells investors about all the growth it's going to generate and how high AI demand is. Every year, the market doubts Nvidia, then the growth comes, and in the second half of the year, the stock soars.

I see that same trend starting this year, and fortunately for investors, the market hasn't caught on quite yet. This disconnect creates a huge opportunity to buy the stock now and profit from history. Investors shouldn't delay, as the stock could easily start its rally at any time.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Nvidia's growth usually starts around its Q1 earnings release Starting in 2023, you have to remember that the consensus was that the economy was heading into a recession in late 2022 and early 2023. As a result, optimism was not high. Furthermore, the market was coming off a cryptocurrency crash, which created an inventory excess for Nvidia, causing its earnings to plummet.

As a result, Nvidia entered 2023 on a relatively grim outlook, but all of that changed in Q1 when it told investors about huge AI demand.

NVDA data by YCharts

Unfortunately, I don't have the price of forward earnings data dating back to 2023, but I do have it for 2024. That year, the same thing happened. Investors assumed Nvidia's growth wouldn't live up to the hype, so the stock traded at low expectations for a few months. Then, it rocketed higher throughout the rest of the year.

NVDA data by YCharts

2025 was a bit unique because of the tariff sell-off in April, but as soon as the market figured out that Nvidia would be fine, it rallied around the stock.

NVDA data by YCharts

At the start of 2026, I see a similar setup for Nvidia, so far. The stock is relatively flat and trades for 22 times forward earnings, about the same price tag it trades around at this point of the year. There are also other concerns surrounding Nvidia, like the longevity of heightened AI spending and geopolitical issues like the Iran war.

NVDA data by YCharts

However, this is no different than the setup in 2025, and I think that Nvidia's stock will rocket higher throughout the rest of the year once investors realize that Nvidia's growth is unaffected by many things investors are concerned about.

Nvidia has a massive demand for its new computing hardware Nvidia is thriving on heightened AI capital expenditures. With the big four planning on spending around $650 billion this year, it bodes well for Nvidia's stock.

But 2026 isn't expected to be the last year of this. Most of the giant data center projects the AI hyperscalers have announced over the past few years are just starting construction and will take years to progress to the point where they are buying Nvidia chips. This delay extends Nvidia's growth far beyond just 2026.

Today's Change

(

-3.17

%) $

-5.66

Current Price

$

172.90

Furthermore, Nvidia dropped the bombshell during its 2026 GTC event that it expects $1 trillion in sales for its Blackwell and Rubin GPU systems through 2027. Last year, this figure was $500 billion, so it's clear that the company is seeing massive orders. As this projection becomes a reality, I think the market will rally around Nvidia's stock and send it higher, much like it has over the past few years.

Nvidia's stock has a predictable pattern: It comes in cheaply valued to start the year, proves it deserves a premium valuation, and then the stock soars. I think 2026 will be a repeat of that same pattern, and because the stock hasn't soared yet, it's one of the best AI stocks to buy right now.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP reminds investors that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Hansink v. ChowChow Cloud International Holdings Limited, et.al, Case 1:26-cv-02063, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired ChowChow Cloud International Holdings Limited ("CHOW" or the "Company") (NYSE American: CHOW) securities between September 16, 2025 and December 10, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period").

Plaintiff pursues claims against CHOW, Yee Kar Wing, Hui Wai Ming, Wong Chung Wai, Assentsure PAC, and US Tiger Securities, Inc., as well as unidentified John Does 1-100, (the "Defendants"), under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.

Investors are hereby notified that they have until May 12, 2026 to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff in this action.

You may obtain a copy of the complaint and submit your contact information on our website. Or you may call our New York office directly: 1-212-545-4774.

ChowChow Cloud International Holdings Limited is a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with operations conducted by indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Sereno Cloud Solutions HK Limited in Hong Kong, a special administrative region of the People's Republic of China. The Company's operations are conducted in the Asia-Pacific region with a strong presence in Hong Kong and Singapore. The Company is purportedly  a pioneer in providing one-stop cloud solutions that support companies across the IT industry value chain throughout their entire cloud transformation journey from consulting, deployment, and migration to cloud environmental building and management.

Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and the true nature of the trading activity in the securities. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (i) CHOW was the subject of a market manipulation and fraudulent promotion scheme involving social-media based misinformation and impersonators posing as financial professionals; (ii) CHOW's public statements and risk disclosures omitted any mention of the realized risk of fraudulent trading or market manipulation used to drive the Company's stock price; (iii) that, as a result, CHOW securities were at unique risk of a sustained suspension in trading by NYSE American and severe volatility-induced decline; (iv) that the sole underwriter on the Initial Public Offering ("IPO"), Tiger Securities, had been fined and censured by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") in April 2025 for failing to have a reasonable system in place to identify potentially suspicious deposits of low-priced securities; and (v) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On December 10, 2025, the pump-and-dump scheme was revealed with catastrophic losses to investors. At approximately 11:05 AM EST, a surge of sell orders and volume of approximately 360,000 caused the price of CHOW ordinary shares to plummet from $11.95 per share to $10.59 per share in a span of mere minutes. At 11:07 AM EST, NYSE American halted CHOW ordinary shares from trading due to volatility. The halt remained in effect until 12.37 PM EST when the stock reopened for trading at the price of approximately $1.00 per share. NYSE American halted CHOW ordinary shares for a second time from 3:44 PM EST until 3:49 PM EST,  before ultimately closing at $1.83 per share, a single day loss of 84.3%.

On the next day, December 11, 2025, the Company issued a press release, stating that "the Company had become aware of unusual trading activity in its ordinary shares on the [NYSE American] on December 10 and December 11, 2025." CHOW also stated that it "made inquiries and has been unable to determine whether corrective actions are appropriate at this time." The Company then announced, "that there has been no material development in its business and affairs not previously disclosed or, to its knowledge, any other reason to account for the unusual market action."

Shares of CHOW have been trending lower after the end of the class period and now trade below $0.50 per share.

Why Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP?

This illustrious firm, founded in 1888, is steadfast in their pursuit of justice for investors who have suffered financial harm due to these misrepresented statements. The law firm brings to the fore over 125 years of legal expertise in securities litigation and has a proven track record of protecting the rights of investors.

We encourage all investors who have been affected or have information that will assist in our investigation, to contact Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP.

Contact:

Phone: (800) 575-0735 or (212) 545-4774 Email: [email protected] Contact Person: Gregory Stone, Director of Case and Financial Analysis Case Website: Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

SOURCE Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 22, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. (NASDAQ: TCPC) between November 6, 2024, and January 23, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 6, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased BlackRock TCP securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the BlackRock TCP class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52921 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 6, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about BlackRock TCP's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) BlackRock TCP's investments were not being timely and/or appropriately valued; (2) BlackRock TCP's efforts at portfolio restructuring were not effectively resolving challenged credits or improving the quality of the portfolio; (3) as a result, BlackRock TCP's unrealized losses were understated; (4) as a result, BlackRock TCP's net asset value was overstated; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about BlackRock TCP's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the BlackRock TCP class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52921 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289492

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Nvidia (NVDA 3.17%) is the poster child for the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. Its chips are the "brains" that make AI function. However, AI doesn't live in a vacuum. With rising oil and natural gas prices, investors may need to start worrying about the future of AI companies like Nvidia. Here's why.

Why are oil prices on the rise? The geopolitical conflict in the Middle East has resulted in major supply disruptions. The headline-grabbing problem is oil, but natural gas, chemicals, and even fertilizer markets have also been impacted. When supply is constrained in a commodity market, prices tend to rise.

Image source: Getty Images.

At first glance, this shouldn't affect artificial intelligence stocks. To some degree, that's true, as AI use is likely to continue to expand even amid higher energy costs. However, higher costs will ripple through the entire economy. For example, Nvidia can't make its chips without power, and natural gas is used to generate power. It may find its manufacturing costs heading higher as a result. That's just one small example in what is a vast AI ecosystem.

Reliable and affordable power is also a major bottleneck for companies that build and operate the data centers that house AI. As power prices rise, it will likely become more expensive to build and operate AI infrastructure, altering the technology's cost-benefit analysis. That said, costs are likely to rise throughout the economy, as well.

Fertilizer costs have also risen dramatically, and that could lead to food inflation. Consumers are already tightening their budgets, so higher costs for gasoline, electricity, and food could easily push the U.S. economy into a recession. If that spills over to the rest of the world, AI could run into a very big wall.

The AI build-out story could be at risk There are estimates that as much as $700 billion could be spent on the AI build-out in 2026. That's a huge sum of money, but all of that capital investment depends on the belief that there will be a satisfactory return. Large capital investment projects, such as building data centers, constructing factories, and even investing in new technology (such as AI), tend to be cyclical. During a recession, spending on such things often gets delayed or even canceled.

Today's Change

(

-3.17

%) $

-5.66

Current Price

$

172.90

To be sure, the sky isn't falling. Demand for and use of artificial intelligence will continue to grow even in a worst-case scenario. The real issue for investors is that Wall Street has priced in a lot of good news for many leading AI stocks. Nvidia's price-to-earnings ratio is 36x, which is high on an absolute level and well above the S&P 500 (^GSPC 1.51%) index's P/E of 27x. Nvidia's P/E is actually on the low side compared to some other stocks that have been viewed as AI investments, like Silicon Labs (SLAB +0.10%), which sports a P/E of more than 200x based on adjusted 2025 earnings.

Today's Change

(

-5.09

%) $

-0.35

Current Price

$

6.53

There are also many AI companies that haven't yet achieved sustainable profits, such as SoundHound AI (SOUN 5.09%). While the stock has lost two-thirds of its value, investors could continue selling if AI spending starts to slow.

Investment fads always end AI is as important a technology as the internet was at the turn of the century. But, as with the internet, not every company will end up a winner, and even the winners may find that investors won't continue to support lofty valuations forever. It may be too early to say that rising oil prices are going to burst the AI bubble, but AI investors shouldn't ignore the potential for that to happen, given the history of bubbles on Wall Street.

The seal of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seen at their headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2021. Picture taken May 12, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

CompaniesMarch 22 (Reuters) - Electric vehicle startup Faraday Future (FFAI.O), opens new tab said on Sunday ​the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ‌has concluded its investigation into the company with no action against it.

The closure would help ​the California-based company to pursue ​strategic financing and partnerships, after compliance ⁠concerns during the probe made it ​difficult to work with major banks and ​investors, the company said.

Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.

Faraday Future had previously disclosed the investigation related to certain matters involving its 2021 ​PIPE financing and SPAC-related transactions, and ​that the SEC had issued notices to the company ‌and ⁠certain executives.

In March 2022, the SEC subpoenaed some members of Faraday Future's management team as part of a probe into inaccurate ​statements made ​to ⁠its investors after going public the year earlier.

An internal review ​in February 2022 identified certain ​inaccurate ⁠statements, and the company cut the base salaries of then-CEO Carsten Breitfeld and ⁠founder ​Jia Yueting, asking them ​to report to Executive Chairperson Susan Swenson.

Reporting by Angela ​Christy in Bengaluru; Editing by Chris Reese

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

The logo of a Tesla electric vehicle is placed on a car outside a dealership in Drogenbos, Belgium November 25, 2023. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryCompaniesSpaceX, Tesla to build advanced chip factories in Austin, TexasTerafab project involves SpaceX, xAI, and Tesla collaborationMusk says global chip output meets only 3% of his ​companies' future needsLOS ANGELES, March 22 (Reuters) - SpaceX and Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab will ‌build two advanced chip factories at a sprawling facility in Austin, Texas, one to power cars and humanoid robots, and another designed for artificial intelligence data centers in space, CEO ​Elon Musk said on Sunday.

The comments followed Musk’s announcement a day earlier ​of plans to build “Terafab,” an advanced AI chip complex in Austin.

Stay up to date with the latest news, trends and innovations that are driving the global automotive industry with the Reuters Auto File newsletter. Sign up here.

“Terafab ⁠will technically be two fabs, each making only one chip design,” Musk wrote ​in a post on X.

Musk has previously said Tesla would need to build its ​own AI chip plant, but the involvement of SpaceX had not been disclosed. SpaceX, which is preparing for a public listing that could value the company at around $1.75 trillion, recently merged with Musk’s ​social media and artificial intelligence firm xAI.

“We either build the Terafab or we ​don’t have the chips,” Musk said during a presentation in an Austin facility on Saturday, adding ‌current ⁠global chip production would meet only a small fraction of his companies’ future needs.

Musk did not give a timeline for the new project. Musk has a track record of announcing highly ambitious projects, though several have faced delays or fallen ​away.

Musk said he was ​grateful to existing ⁠chip suppliers, naming Samsung (005930.KS), opens new tab, TSMC (2330.TW), opens new tab and Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, but said demand from his companies would eventually exceed total global chip output.

Terafab ​will eventually produce one terawatt of computing capacity a year, ​compared with ⁠about half a terawatt currently generated across the United States, Musk said.

He said one chip would be used in Tesla vehicles and Optimus humanoid robots, while the second ⁠would ​be designed for AI satellites in space.

“We need ​a high‑powered chip designed for space that takes into account the harsher environment,” Musk said, adding it ​would need to operate at higher temperatures.

Reporting by Joe Brock; Editing by Chris Reese

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Joe Brock is Reuters' aerospace and defense editor, based in Los Angeles, where he leads a global team of reporters covering airlines, aerospace, weapons manufacturers, and the space industry. Joe has previously worked in Singapore, Johannesburg, Abuja and London as a reporter and bureau chief. He has received several awards for his investigative journalism, including from the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing and The Society of Publishers in Asia.

, /PRNewswire/ --

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: AQST) between June 16, 2025 and January 8, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 4, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

So what: If you purchased Aquestive securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Aquestive class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55756 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 4, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose the true state of Aquestive's New Drug Application ("NDA") for Anaphylm; pertinently, Aquestive concealed or otherwise minimized the significance of the human factors involved in the use and deployment of its sublingual film, such as packaging, use, administration, and labeling. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Aquestive class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55756 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FL / ACCESS Newswire / March 22, 2026 / On this Global World Water Day, observed today across the world, Elektros Inc. first and foremost gives thanks to God and recognizes this meaningful day as a reminder that access to clean water is a God-given gift and a fundamental human right for every single person. We acknowledge the importance of coming together globally to support safe, clean drinking water for all.

Elektros Inc. today announced, in recognition of Global World Water Day being observed worldwide, that the Company is actively exploring a humanitarian initiative aimed at improving access to clean drinking water in Sierra Leone, West Africa, where it is engaged in ongoing lithium-related activities.

Access to clean and safe drinking water remains a critical challenge in many regions of Sierra Leone. Elektros believes that supporting local communities is an essential component of responsible global operations and long-term partnership development.

In addition, the Company recognizes that waterborne illnesses and malaria-related health risks remain a serious concern in affected regions. Contaminated and unsafe water sources can contribute to widespread illness, placing strain on families and local healthcare systems. Elektros believes that improving access to clean, safe drinking water can play a meaningful role in helping protect children, parents, and families from preventable health risks and reduce the burden on hospitals and clinics.

As part of this commitment, Elektros management is currently in discussions regarding the potential shipment of one to three containers of premium bottled water to Sierra Leone in the near future, specifically for the communities and villages in which the Company operates. The Company is evaluating the use of glass-bottled water to preserve purity, freshness, and overall quality during transport and distribution.

"We believe it is important to give back to the communities we work with," said Shlomo Bleier, CEO of Elektros Inc. "Our partners in Sierra Leone are very important to us. Clean water is not a luxury-it is a fundamental human right. We are working diligently to deliver between one and three containers of fresh, clean bottled water to the communities we are engaged with, and we hope this effort will help protect families and children from serious health risks.

We want to begin with the villages we are directly connected to and grow from there. Providing clean water would be a tremendous blessing to these communities, and something we believe can make a meaningful and lasting impact.

The highest level of intelligence is kindness. We strive to lead with that principle, and to be kind-especially to our partners, the people working with us and alongside us in Sierra Leone. Supporting them with access to safe, clean water is something very special to us, and we are committed to making it a reality."

Elektros views this initiative as a first step in a broader commitment to community support and sustainable engagement. The Company is currently evaluating logistics, sourcing, and distribution strategies to ensure the most efficient and impactful delivery possible.

This initiative reflects Elektros' belief that innovation in energy and mobility must be matched by a commitment to humanitarian responsibility and global well-being.

Contact Information:
Website: www.elektros.energy
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 786-477-9003

Forward-Looking Statements:

This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated due to a variety of factors, including logistical, regulatory, and operational considerations.

SOURCE: Elektros Inc.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, is investigating potential violations of the federal securities laws by GoDaddy Inc. (GoDaddy) (NYSE: GDDY) on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired GDDY securities and experienced significant financial losses.

GoDaddy Reports Disappointing Financial Results
On February 24, 2026, GoDaddy reported disappointing fourth quarter 2025 financial results. Addressing the poor results, GoDaddy explained that the company had "introduced a promotional price for .com domains with a 1-year term", but "the shift in term mix, combined with the promotional price, reduced up front bookings and near-term revenue." Additionally, GoDaddy provided 2026 guidance, and stated that the company "anticipate[s] a modest impact on reported revenue growth rates for the year in both Core Platform and A&C segments as the promotional price is allocated to all products included in the initial purchase."

GDDY Stock Drops Over 14%
Following this news, GoDaddy's stock price fell $13.18 per share, or over 14%. 

Investors who purchased GoDaddy (NYSE: GDDY) securities and experienced losses may have legal rights under the federal securities laws.

CONTACT KTMC TO DISCUSS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS
If you are a GoDaddy Inc. (NYSE: GDDY) investor, you are encouraged to contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. at:

(484) 270-1453 [email protected] https://www.ktmc.com/gddy-godaddy-inc-investigation?utm_source=PR_Newswire&utm_medium=pressrelease&utm_campaign=gddy&mktm=PR There is no cost or obligation to speak with an attorney.

ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP (KTMC):
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (KTMC) is a leading U.S. plaintiff-side law firm focused on securities-fraud class actions and global investor protection. The firm represents individual investors as well as institutions, such as major pension funds, asset managers, and international investors. KTMC has led some of the largest recoveries in securities litigation and has been recognized by peers and the legal media with numerous accolades, including The National Law Journal's Plaintiff's Hot List and Trailblazers in Plaintiffs' Law, BTI Consulting Group's Honor Roll of Most Feared Law Firms, The Legal Intelligencer's Class Action Firm of the Year, Lawdragon's Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers, and Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar. The firm operates globally with offices in Pennsylvania and California. KTMC has recovered over $25 billion for our clients and the classes they represent. For more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, please visit www.ktmc.com.

CONTACT:
Jonathan Naji, Esq.
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
(484) 270-1453
[email protected]

May be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

SOURCE Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $OMF--OMF Investors Have Opportunity to Join OneMain Holdings, Inc. Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm.

Beyond Meat (BYND 2.15%) was a Wall Street and Main Street darling a few years ago, as its plant-based meat alternative products sparked a food fad. At one point, it seemed like everyone wanted to try Beyond Meat. Like most fads, demand for plant-based meat alternatives faded. Now big retailers, like Walmart (WMT 1.56%) and Costco (COST 0.29%), appear to be relegating Beyond Meat to the frozen food aisle. It could be a good thing, mostly.

Beyond Meat had its big shot Beyond Meat's sales skyrocketed after it held its initial public offering. But in 2022, the packaged food company hit an inflection point, as its sales began to fall. The once hot products it sold were no longer in demand, as customers tried them and clearly decided they preferred real meat.

Image source: Getty Images.

Wall Street has punished the stock, as the consumer staples start-up has continued to bleed red ink. However, the brand itself still has notable value, as it is basically "the face" of the broader plant-based meat alternative niche. So the push from the meat aisle to the frozen food aisle can be viewed in two ways.

The good and the bad for Beyond Meat The bad news for Beyond Meat is that it had its shot, and consumers voted with their wallets. While Beyond Meat didn't catch on more broadly, some consumers still buy it. The move to the frozen food aisle allows those customers to continue buying Beyond Meat's products. It will likely mean lower, but more reliable revenues for the food maker.

Today's Change

(

-2.15

%) $

-0.02

Current Price

$

0.70

Frozen foods also have a longer shelf life. That means Beyond Meat doesn't have to produce at the same volume, and retailers won't have to throw away as much food due to spoilage. That is a win for both parties.

On that front, it is worth highlighting that Beyond Meat had to delay its fourth-quarter 2025 earnings release. The stated reason was that it required "additional time to complete a review and analysis related to its inventory balances, including amounts recorded for the provision of excess and obsolete inventory." It appears that even Beyond Meat is throwing away unsold inventory.

The big question mark is whether Beyond Meat can leverage the shift into the frozen food aisle into sustainable profitability. So far, sustainably positive earnings have eluded the company.

This is not a sign to buy Beyond Meat Beyond Meat shifting to the frozen food aisle is an interesting development that could help stabilize the business. However, investors need to tread carefully with the money-losing start-up. Most investors should watch from the sidelines until Beyond Meat has proven that living in the frozen food aisle is actually good for its business.

Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Beyond Meat, Costco Wholesale, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Tim logo is seen at its headquarters in Rome, Italy November 22, 2021. REUTERS/Yara Nardi/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

March 22 (Reuters) - Italian majority-state-owned national postal service Poste Italiane (PST.MI), opens new tab said ​on Sunday it was launching ‌a cash and share offer to buy former phone monopoly Telecom Italia (TIM) for ​10.8 billion euros ($12.5 billion).

Poste, which ​is already TIM's largest shareholder, said ⁠it would offer 0.167 euros in ​cash as well as 0.0218 newly ​issued Poste shares for each TIM share tendered - valuing TIM shares at 0.635 euros ​each, or a 9.01% premium to ​Friday's closing price.

Get a daily digest of breaking business news straight to your inbox with the Reuters Business newsletter. Sign up here.

Poste said the takeover, aimed at ‌taking ⁠TIM private, would provide the group with a mobile and fixed-line telecoms network and a leading position ​in cloud ​and data ⁠centre infrastructure.

The combined group would have pro forma revenue ​of 27 billion euros and ​an ⁠operating profit of 5 billion euros with more than 150,000 employees, Poste ⁠said ​in a statement.

($1 = ​0.8643 euros)

Reporting by Angela Christy in Bengaluru and Valentina ​Za in Milan; Editing by Peter Graff

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

On February 17, 2026, Millstreet Capital Management disclosed a new position in Diversified Energy Company (DEC +0.56%), acquiring 1,378,421 shares in the fourth quarter worth $19.96 million.

What happenedAccording to a SEC filing dated February 17, 2026, Millstreet Capital Management established a new stake in Diversified Energy Company during the fourth quarter. The fund acquired 1,378,421 shares, and the quarter-end value of the position was $19.96 million.

What else to knowThis new position represents 4.5% of Millstreet’s 13F reportable assets under management following the filing.Reported holdings after the filing:NYSE:DBD: $388.10 million (88.5% of AUM)NYSE:CPS: $30.60 million (7.0% of AUM)NYSE:DEC: $19.96 million (4.5% of AUM)As of Friday, shares of Diversified Energy Company were priced at $16.20, up 19% over the past year, which is slightly outperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 15% gain in the same period.Company overviewMetricValueRevenue (TTM)$1.61 billionNet Income (TTM)$341.1 millionDividend Yield7%Price (as of Friday)$16.20Company snapshotDiversified Energy Company produces, markets, and transports natural gas, natural gas liquids, crude oil, and condensates, with primary assets in the Appalachian Basin and additional operations in Oklahoma, Texas, and Louisiana.The firm operates as an independent owner and operator of producing wells, generating revenue through the sale of hydrocarbons and associated midstream services.Diversified Energy Company is a leading independent energy producer focused on mature, low-decline natural gas and oil assets across the United States. It is headquartered in Alabama.

What this transaction means for investorsWith nearly 90% of this portfolio concentrated in a single name and just three holdings overall, adding a 4.5% stake in Diversified Energy is not casual diversification. It’s a calculated move toward a cash flow profile that contrasts sharply with traditional growth holdings, and that’s significant in the current landscape.

Diversified isn’t aiming for explosive production growth. Instead, it focuses on generating steady cash flow from mature assets, and the latest results support that strategy. The company reported $1.8 billion in full-year revenue, nearly $1 billion in adjusted EBITDA, and around $440 million in free cash flow, all while improving leverage and returning over $185 million to shareholders.

However, the narrative is becoming more intricate. With roughly $2 billion in acquisitions and a new partnership strategy aimed at driving growth, there’s also the introduction of integration risk and a potential reliance on ongoing deal execution. Nevertheless, the bet here certainly seems to signal conviction in ongoing execution.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has closed its investigation into electric vehicle startup Faraday Future, despite SEC staff on the case recommending an enforcement action last year, TechCrunch has learned.

Four sources familiar with the investigation, who were granted anonymity to speak about the government case, told TechCrunch that the SEC informed the company and people involved in the probe about the closure this past week.

The dismissal of the case comes amid a historic drop in enforcement actions by the SEC, which only initiated four cases against publicly-traded companies in its 2025 fiscal year, a recent report shows. The SEC did not respond to an after-hours request for comment.

The investigation into Faraday Future lasted for nearly four years. The SEC was looking at whether the EV startup made “false and misleading statements” when it went public in a 2021 merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), and was also probing whether Faraday Future faked the sales of its first electric vehicles in 2023 — a claim that’s been made by at least three former employee whistleblowers.

The financial regulator sent the startup multiple subpoenas, regulatory filings from Faraday Future show. The SEC also took depositions of multiple former employees and executives in 2024 and 2025, three of the people familiar with the case have told TechCrunch.

In July 2025, Faraday Future revealed the SEC had sent the company and multiple executives — including founder Jia Yueting — letters known as “Wells Notices.” The SEC sends Wells Notices when staff working a case have decided to recommend the agency take enforcement action.

It’s not clear if Faraday Future ever responded to the Wells Notices sent last year. As recently as February, the company disclosed in regulatory filings that it had not. “The Company and executives plan to engage with the SEC to explain why enforcement action is not warranted,” Faraday Future wrote in such a filing last month. A company spokesperson said Sunday that Faraday Future would share more information later Sunday.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026

The Department of Justice also sent Faraday Future requests for information after the SEC opened its investigation in 2022. Faraday Future has referred to this as an “investigation” in regulatory filings; the DOJ has never confirmed if it opened a full probe, and it did not respond to an after-hours request for comment.

It is rare for the SEC to not pursue an enforcement action after sending a Wells Notice. One study done at the Wharton School in 2020 showed that around 85% of targets who receive a Wells Notice wind up in court with the SEC.

The SEC investigated nearly every electric vehicle startup that went public in a SPAC merger over the last six years. In almost all of those cases, the agency reached a settlement with the startups. It dismissed an investigation into Lucid Motors in 2023, and as TechCrunch first reported in February, the SEC ended a probe into bankrupt EV startup Fisker late last year.

Origins of the investigation Faraday Future was founded in California in 2014 by Jia, a businessman who at the time was running a booming tech conglomerate in China known as LeEco. It was one of many new companies trying to become the “next Tesla” or, optimistically, a “Tesla killer.”

Faraday snapped up talent from Tesla, other automakers, and also tech companies like Apple, and at one point employed as many as around 1,400 employees. But things got bumpy quickly. The company turned heads, in both good and bad ways, at the 2016 Consumer Electronics Show, with a flashy concept car and the lofty goal of being as disruptive as the iPhone.

The company revealed its first vehicle the following year: a luxury electric SUV called the FF91. By the end of 2017, though the company was nearly out of cash and had laid off or furloughed hundreds of workers. Jia’s company in China had collapsed, and he self-exiled to California as the government in his home country placed him on a debtor blacklist. (It was at this time that a close business associate to Jeffrey Epstein pitched the sex criminal on investing in Faraday Future, as well as other EV startups, as TechCrunch recently revealed. Epstein never invested.)

Faraday Future was rescued by an investment from major Chinese real estate conglomerate Evergrande. But that relationship fell apart quickly, too, with Evergrande walking away by the end of 2018 and Faraday Future laying off even more employees.

Jia nominally stepped aside as CEO in 2019 and also filed for personal bankruptcy to settle billions of dollars of LeEco debt he had personally guaranteed. But behind the scenes, he was still largely in charge of the company.

This became an issue when Faraday Future went public in 2021 and raised about $1 billion. Members of the newly-appointed public company board believed that Faraday’s executives had misrepresented Jia’s control over the day-to-day operations — especially after a short seller report was published that scrutinized Faraday Future — and formed a special committee to investigate.

That committee hired an outside law firm and a forensic accounting firm, and within the first few months it started reporting its findings directly to the SEC, the three people familiar with the investigation told TechCrunch.

Between January and April 2022, Jia was sidelined as a result of the board’s investigation, a senior VP named Matthias Aydt (who is now co-CEO with Jia) was placed on probation for six months, and another VP named Jerry Wang (who is Jia’s nephew) was suspended. (Wang ultimately resigned after “failure to cooperate with the investigation,” according to company filings, but is now back with Faraday Future.)

The committee’s work also showed that Faraday Future had, in the two years before it went public, survived in part on multi-million-dollar loans made to the company by low-level employees with connections to Jia — known as “related party transactions” in legal parlance.

On March 31, 2022, Faraday Future disclosed that the SEC had opened its investigation. The startup revealed the requests for information from the DOJ in June.

Dodging another bullet Through the rest of 2022, and amid the early stages of the SEC investigation, employees and people close to Jia waged a campaign to regain control of the board and his company. This eventually resulted in death threats against some directors, who ultimately resigned, paving the way for people close to Jia to run the company once more.

Faraday Future finally delivered the first few FF91 SUVs in early 2023. Former employees have sued the company alleging that these were not true sales, and that the company had misled investors. The SEC investigators working the case subpoenaed Faraday Future about issues related to these sales, filings show.

Former executives and employees were initially deposed by the SEC in 2024, according to the people familiar with the investigation. The SEC sat some of them for longer depositions in the first half of 2025, the people said.

The Wells Notice sent in July 2025 said SEC staff had made “a preliminary determination to recommend that the Commission file an enforcement action against the Company alleging violations of various anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.”

Specifically, the Wells Notice referenced “purported false or misleading statements” made during the SPAC merger process about “related party transactions” and Jia’s “role in the Company.” Jia, his nephew Wang, and two other unnamed employees also received Wells Notices.

Faraday Future is still trying to sell the FF91, but it has also recently changed its business in a few ways. The company is importing more affordable hybrid and electric vans from China. It also appears to be selling re-badged versions of Chinese robots, and turned a publicly-traded biotechnology company into a firm focused on crypto.

Those efforts have not stopped the company’s struggles. On Friday, the company announced it had received a warning from the Nasdaq that its stock price was under the minimum of $1, which could eventually lead to the company being de-listed.

NEW YORK, March 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALDX) resulting from allegations that Aldeyra may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Aldeyra securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=38697 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On March 17 2026, Aldeyra filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K, in which it announced its receipt from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) a Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) regarding its New Drug Application (“NDA”) of reproxalap. The report stated that the “CRL stated that there is “a lack of substantial evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled investigations … that the drug product will have the effect it purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its proposed labeling” and that “the application has failed to demonstrate efficacy in adequate and well controlled studies in the treatment of signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.” The letter also stated that the “inconsistency of study results raises serious concerns about the reliability and meaningfulness of the positive findings” and that the “totality of evidence from the completed clinical trials does not support the effectiveness of the product.””

On this news, Aldeyra’s stock price fell $2.99 per share, or 70.7% to close at $1.24 per share on March 17, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

17.65K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of VOO either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

On February 17, 2026, B Group, Inc. disclosed a new position in Structure Therapeutics (GPCR 3.96%), acquiring 90,000 shares in the fourth quarter.

What happenedB Group disclosed in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated February 17, 2026, that it initiated a new position in Structure Therapeutics (GPCR 3.96%) by purchasing 90,000 shares. The quarter-end value of the stake stood at $6.26 million, reflecting pricing as of December 31, 2025.

What else to knowThis new position made up 4.62% of B Group’s reportable U.S. equity assets as of the December 31, 2025, filing.Top holdings after the filing:NASDAQ:ADMA: $44.83 million (33.2% of AUM)NASDAQ:CLLS: $15.88 million (11.8% of AUM)NASDAQ:PALI: $10.57 million (7.8% of AUM)NASDAQ:TSHA: $9.90 million (7.3% of AUM)NASDAQ:PRAX: $9.80 million (7.3% of AUM)As of Friday, GPCR shares were priced at $48.59, up a staggering 132% over the past year and well outperforming the S&P 500, which is instead up about 15% in the same period.Company overviewMetricValuePrice (as of Friday)$48.59Market Capitalization$3.4 billionNet Income (TTM)($141.2 million)Company snapshotStructure Therapeutics develops oral therapeutics targeting chronic diseases, with lead candidates focused on type-2 diabetes, obesity, pulmonary, and cardiovascular conditions.The firm operates a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical business model, generating value through the advancement of proprietary drug candidates targeting validated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).It targets healthcare providers and patients with unmet medical needs in chronic disease segments such as diabetes, obesity, and pulmonary fibrosis.Structure Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in the development of novel oral small molecule therapeutics for chronic diseases with significant unmet needs. The company leverages proprietary expertise in targeting GPCRs to advance a pipeline of differentiated drug candidates, including GSBR-1290 for type-2 diabetes and obesity, and additional programs for pulmonary and cardiovascular indications. With a focus on innovation in oral therapeutics, Structure Therapeutics aims to address large, underserved patient populations and establish a competitive edge in the biopharmaceutical sector.

What this transaction means for investorsStructure Therapeutics sits right at the center of one of the most crowded and high-stakes markets in biotech: obesity and metabolic disease. The company’s recent data suggests it could have a real shot. Its lead drug candidate delivered weight loss of more than 16% in a mid-stage trial, putting it in striking distance of injectable therapies while offering the convenience of an oral option. That kind of profile is what keeps investors engaged even when the financials look messy.

And that’s somewhat the case here. The company posted a full-year net loss of about $141 million as R&D spending ramped to support late-stage trials, a reminder that this is still a capital-intensive, pre-commercial story. With shares down 28% this year, the recent selloff reflects that reality, but not necessarily a broken thesis. Longer-term, the upside will hinge on clinical execution and not near-term earnings. But volatility will likely play a role regardless.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Adma Biologics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

One of the hardest-hit parts of the market this year has been software stocks. There has been a growing fear among investors that artificial intelligence (AI) will completely disrupt the software-as-a-service (SaaS) industry. As such, there has been pretty indiscriminate selling in the space, with few SaaS stocks spared.

There are three main tenets to the bear case against software stocks. One is simply that AI will result in fewer workers, which will hurt SaaS company revenue, since most price their subscriptions based on the number of users who have access to their platforms. The second is that with AI, those organizations will be more easily able to develop custom software, bypassing third-party vendors. Finally, some see large language model (LLM) developers like Anthropic and OpenAI looking to use AI to bypass the software layer entirely.

Image source: Getty Images.

In my view, all three sound like long shots. SaaS models will likely evolve over time from being more seat-based to consumption-based, which should address the first issue. Meanwhile, it's never been difficult to create front-end software, but most organizations don't want to be responsible for the maintenance and governance hassles, as it's not worth the cost and risk.

Finally, AI likely isn't going to eliminate the software layer but instead increase its importance by helping organizations better apply AI to increase efficiency and drive growth. AI needs structured data, and the software companies that control the data and workflow are of vital importance.

While there will be some SaaS casualties, this will not be the companies that created moats built on top of proprietary data and complex workflows. As such, I think ServiceNow (NOW 2.52%) is one of the best stocks to buy following the SaaS sell-off.

Today's Change

(

-2.52

%) $

-2.85

Current Price

$

110.42

An AI winner ServiceNow is tightly ingrained within its customers' workflows, linking an organization's data between information technology, human resources, and customer service. It is an important system of record built on security permissions, custom business logic, and audit trails.

Meanwhile, the company has leaned into AI to drive growth. Its Now Assist generative AI suite of solutions has seen its annual contract value rise to $600 million at the end of last quarter, with it projected to hit $1 billion by the end of this year. This is helping propel the company's overall 20%-plus revenue growth.

At the same time, ServiceNow is looking to become a leader in agentic AI orchestration with its AI Control Tower. It also recently acquired AI cybersecurity companies Armis and Veza to strengthen its position around rights permissions and asset visibility, which will become increasingly important in an agentic AI world. With agentic AI in its early innings, this has the potential to be the company's next big growth driver.

With its stock down 25% on the year, now is the time to scoop up the shares of a beaten-down SaaS company that looks poised to be an AI winner.

, /PRNewswire/ --

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (NYSE: APO) between May 10, 2021 and February 21, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 1, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action first filed by the Firm.

So what: If you purchased Apollo Global securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Apollo Global class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1323 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 1, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants Marc Rowan and Leon Black, among other leadership figures at Apollo Global, frequently communicated with Jeffrey Epstein in the 2010s regarding Apollo Global's business; (2) as a result, Apollo Global's assertion that Apollo Global had never done business with Jeffrey Epstein was untrue; (3) because of the entanglement between Apollo Global's leaders and Jeffrey Epstein, the harm to Apollo Global's reputation was more than a mere possibility; and (4) as a result, defendants' statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. 

To join the Apollo Global class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1323 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:
     Laurence Rosen, Esq.
     Phillip Kim, Esq.
     The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
     275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
     New York, NY  10016
     Tel: (212) 686-1060
     Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
     Fax: (212) 202-3827
     [email protected]
     www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

SAN DIEGO, March 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW) Class A common stock between June 27, 2023 and the close of market on February 28, 2024 (4:00 p.m. EST), both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until April 27, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Snowflake class action lawsuit. Captioned Patel v. Snowflake Inc., No. 26-cv-01613 (N.D. Cal.), the Snowflake class action lawsuit charges Snowflake as well as certain of Snowflake’s former top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Snowflake class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-snowflake-class-action-lawsuit-snow.html

You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected].

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Snowflake provides a cloud-based data platform for various organizations.

The Snowflake class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) product efficiency gains, Iceberg Tables, and tiered storage pricing were expected to have a material negative impact on consumption and revenues; and (ii) the headwinds caused by product efficiency gains, Iceberg Tables, and tiered storage pricing put Snowflake’s ability to reach $10 billion in revenue and product revenue in 2029 in doubt.

The Snowflake class action lawsuit further alleges that on February 28, 2024, Snowflake announced its financial results for the quarter ended January 31, 2024 and full fiscal year 2024, disclosing that Snowflake was forecasting increased revenue headwinds associated with product efficiency gains, tiered storage pricing, and the expectation that some of Snowflake’s customers will leverage Iceberg Tables for their storage. On this news, the price of Snowflake Class A common stock fell more than 18%, according to the complaint.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Snowflake Class A common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Snowflake class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Snowflake investor class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Snowflake shareholder class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Snowflake class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation. Our Firm ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report, recovering more than $916 million for investors in 2025. This marks our fourth #1 ranking in the past five years. And in those five years alone, Robbins Geller recovered $8.4 billion for investors – $3.4 billion more than any other law firm. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. 
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:
        Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
        J.C. Sanchez
        655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
        800-449-4900
        [email protected]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, is investigating potential violations of the federal securities laws by Freshpet, Inc. (Freshpet) (NASDAQ: FRPT) on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired FRPT securities and experienced significant financial losses.

Freshpet's Dog Food Advertising Found Misleading
On March 17, 2026, following a Fast-Track SWIFT challenge brought by The Farmer's Dog, the BBB National Programs' National Advertising Division ("NAD") found that certain of Freshpet's dog food advertisements were misleading. Specifically, the NAD determined that Freshpet's video advertisements, including statements and images implying that their dog food is made "the same way you make healthy food for people," convey a message that Freshpet's dog food is human grade. Accordingly, the NAD recommended that Freshpet discontinue such claims and modify the advertisements.

FRPT Stock Drops Over 10%
Following this news, the price of Freshpet's stock declined $7.95 per share, or nearly 11%, from a close of $75.37 per share on March 16, 2026, to close at $67.42 per share on March 17, 2026. 

Investors who purchased Freshpet (NASDAQ: FRPT) securities and experienced losses may have legal rights under the federal securities laws.

CONTACT KTMC TO DISCUSS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS
If you are a Freshpet, Inc. (NASDAQ: FRPT) investor, you are encouraged to contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. at:

(484) 270-1453 [email protected] https://www.ktmc.com/frpt-freshpet-inc-investigation?utm_source=PR_Newswire&utm_medium=pressrelease&utm_campaign=frpt&mktm=PR There is no cost or obligation to speak with an attorney.

ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP (KTMC):
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (KTMC) is a leading U.S. plaintiff-side law firm focused on securities-fraud class actions and global investor protection. The firm represents individual investors as well as institutions, such as major pension funds, asset managers, and international investors. KTMC has led some of the largest recoveries in securities litigation and has been recognized by peers and the legal media with numerous accolades, including The National Law Journal's Plaintiff's Hot List and Trailblazers in Plaintiffs' Law, BTI Consulting Group's Honor Roll of Most Feared Law Firms, The Legal Intelligencer's Class Action Firm of the Year, Lawdragon's Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers, and Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar. The firm operates globally with offices in Pennsylvania and California. KTMC has recovered over $25 billion for our clients and the classes they represent. For more information about Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, please visit www.ktmc.com.

CONTACT:
Jonathan Naji, Esq.
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
(484) 270-1453
[email protected]

May be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

SOURCE Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP