Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 2 premium feeds.
Last news saved atJan 26, 05:0410m agoCron last ranJan 26, 05:0410m ago2
sources live
Switch language
60,432Stories ingested
Auto-fetched market intel nonstop. 292Distinct tickers
Symbols referenced across the feed stockne...Trending sourcesstocknewsapi • cryptonewsHot tickers
BTCXRPETHSOLMSFTSHIB
Surfacing from current coverage
Details
Saved
Published
Title
Source
Tickers
2026-01-18 03:298d ago
2026-01-17 22:258d ago
ROSEN, HIGHLY REGARDED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Smart Digital Group Ltd. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - SDM
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - January 17, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Smart Digital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: SDM) between May 5, 2025 and September 26, 2025 at 9:34 AM EST. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 16, 2026.
SO WHAT: If you purchased SDM securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the SDM class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50638 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 16, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: Smart Digital describes itself as a company that provides digital marketing services. According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Smart Digital was the subject of a market manipulation and fraudulent promotion scheme involving social-media based misinformation and impersonators posing as financial professionals; (2) insiders and/or affiliates used and/or intended to use offshore or nominee accounts to facilitate the coordinated dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign; (3) Smart Digital's public statements and risk disclosures omitted any mention of realized risk of fraudulent trading or market manipulation used to drive Smart Digital's stock price; (4) as a result, Smart Digital securities were at unique risk of a sustained suspension in trading by either or both of the SEC and NASDAQ; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Smart Digital's business, operations and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the SDM class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50638 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/280737
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Contact Us
2026-01-18 03:298d ago
2026-01-17 22:278d ago
ROSEN, REGARDED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - SLM
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - January 17, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds persons who invested in securities of SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (NASDAQ: SLM) between July 25, 2025 and August 14, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important February 17, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased SLM securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the SLM class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=49601 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 17, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) SLM was experiencing a significant increase in early stage delinquencies; (2) accordingly, defendants overstated the effectiveness of SLM's loss mitigation and/or loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of SLM's private education loan ("PEL") delinquency rates; and (3) as a result, defendants' public statements made a materially false and misleading impression regarding SLM's business, operations, and prospects at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the SLM class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=49601 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/280738
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Contact Us
2026-01-18 02:298d ago
2026-01-17 20:058d ago
IonQ Stock Prediction: Here's Where the Quantum Computing Play Will Be in 1 Year
Quantum computing companies have been some of the hottest stocks in the market in recent years.
IonQ (IONQ +6.81%) is one of a handful of companies looking to commercialize quantum computers, the next iteration of the traditional computer. While computers are built on the foundation of bits, the smallest unit of digital information, quantum computers are built on qubits, which are in a state of superposition and can therefore process data and search for solutions simultaneously, rather than sequentially.
Quantum computing is an industry still in the early stages, but investors have seen enough progress that they want to bet on it early. If companies like IonQ commercialize quantum computers, they could be first movers in a massive new industry with unlimited potential.
Image source: Getty Images.
IonQ has certainly made progress this year. The company has generated more than $68 million in revenue through the first three quarters of 2025 and is guiding for as much as $110 million on the year. That's solid growth, and not every quantum company can say that.
IonQ also set a world record for 2-qubit gate performance, a measure of accuracy and speed for quantum systems. The company achieved a 99.99% 2-qubit gate fidelity rate on one of its systems. That means the system can reach solutions faster, has fewer errors per operation, and requires less energy than its competitors.
Here's where IonQ is likely to be in a year.
Improving quantum systems and increasing revenue According to an investor presentation, IonQ is focused on rolling out a 256-qubit system in 2026. The Tempo quantum computing system, which the company introduced last year, had 100 qubits. While the number of qubits isn't everything, the more that run effectively in a gate-based model, the more powerful the system becomes. IonQ's goal between 2027 and 2030 is to build systems with anywhere from 10,000 to 2 million qubits.
Today's Change
(
6.81
%) $
3.24
Current Price
$
50.80
IonQ is also looking to sell more of its current systems and ramp up efforts for commercialization. At the end of December, the company announced a strategic partnership with the Korea Institute of Science and Technology that will ultimately see the company deliver its Tempo 100-qubit system to the organization.
Wall Street analysts, on average, also believe IonQ will be able to significantly increase revenue to $189 million in 2026, according to data from Visible Alpha. Ultimately, I think the company will continue to make progress on its quantum systems and continue to increase revenue, although I still think we are far from commercialization.
Investors should proceed cautiously with the stock, given that the company already trades at a market cap of over $17 billion. I'd keep positions smaller and more speculative at this point.
Despite some troubling developments, it's essential to continue seeking good long-term investment opportunities.
People who have read my market predictions in the past have likely already clicked away -- they know that I've been wrong many times before.
That's OK. Author Morgan Housel said it best in his book The Psychology of Money: "We should use past surprises as an admission that we have no idea what might happen next."
Image source: Getty Images.
In a real sense, I have no idea what will happen in 2026. Making bold, confident market predictions for the year is consequently challenging. Therefore, take these predictions with a grain of salt.
However, several economic developments have caught my attention. And if current trends continue, they could have big implications for the coming year.
So, while one shouldn't take these as prophecy, allow me to share my four market predictions for 2026.
1. Gemini will upset the AI apple cart OpenAI's ChatGPT kicked off the artificial intelligence (AI) trend that has unlocked hundreds of billions of dollars in new infrastructure spending. At one point, the popular chatbot had a virtual monopoly. But Alphabet's (GOOG 0.80%)(GOOGL 0.83%) Gemini is suddenly skyrocketing.
According to analytics firm Similarweb, Gemini's market share jumped from 5% to 18% in 2025. Meanwhile, ChatGPT's market share plunged from 87% to 68%. For a single year, this is a major change, and the trend could be accelerating.
Today's Change
(
-0.80
%) $
-2.65
Current Price
$
330.51
Newer data shows that Gemini may now have an over 21% market share, more than doubling from six months ago. The difference-maker may be Gemini 3, which launched in November to strong reviews. The growth curve could continue in the right direction as well, considering Apple just picked Gemini to power Siri.
This shift from ChatGPT to Gemini could really upset the AI apple cart. OpenAI is reportedly looking to go public, and some believe its valuation could reach $1 trillion. The motivation may be money -- investment bank HSBC estimates that it needs over $200 billion to fulfill its growth plans.
If Gemini becomes the new king of chatbots, OpenAI could struggle to win over investors, potentially leading to a funding shortfall. The AI trend will undoubtedly continue in 2026. But a shift away from OpenAI leading the charge could have a ripple effect throughout the space, as planned spending deals fall through.
2. The market will have a correction (or crash) If my first prediction is correct, then my second prediction is virtually guaranteed. Many investors fear an AI bubble in the stock market, whether that's actually true or not. The point is, fearful investors would immediately flee if it looked like the bubble was finally popping.
However, I'm not being bold by predicting a stock market correction in 2026. A correction is a drop of at least 10%. On average, this happens once every one or two years. In other words, it's quite normal, as the chart of the S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.06%) shows.
^SPX data by YCharts
The last market correction happened in early 2025. If history is any guide, investors should expect another one in the second half of 2026.
3. The power bottleneck will provide opportunities I've mentioned that a correction could start if OpenAI loses steam. After all, the stock market is soaring in large part thanks to the incredible growth in AI and correlated infrastructure spending. However, there's another factor that could slow the AI trend in 2026: the power bottleneck.
In short, the electricity demand from AI infrastructure is increasing much faster than it can be generated. This imbalance in supply and demand is manifesting in higher electricity prices. It's an issue being addressed directly by the Trump administration, which is saying that Microsoft needs to ensure the higher costs aren't passed on to consumers.
The bottleneck with electricity creates some interesting opportunities, in my opinion. It takes years to bring new capacity online. But AI needs power now. Therefore, I believe the opportunity lies with businesses that can help power companies do more with what they already have.
One example of this is Itron (ITRI 0.86%). This company deploys smart meters at the edge of the power grid, enabling power companies to monitor demand in real time. Itron's customers will likely value these products and services more and more because they help maximize the existing grid while waiting for new capacity to come online.
Today's Change
(
-0.86
%) $
-0.87
Current Price
$
100.04
Another example of this could be Tesla (TSLA 0.16%). CEO Elon Musk recently pointed out that power plants could meet much more demand if the demand were evenly distributed throughout a 24-hour day. But it's not; there are peaks and troughs. However, demand could be smoothed out with batteries, such as Tesla's Megapack.
Itron and Tesla are two businesses that I believe can benefit from a bottleneck in electricity, but there could be others as well.
4. The market will end higher by Dec. 31 Finally, I don't want my prediction of a stock market correction to sound like doom and gloom. In investing, it feels smart to be a pessimist, but it pays to be an optimist. The S&P 500 goes up most years. And it tends to recover quickly from drawdowns.
Just consider 2025. At one point, the S&P 500 was down almost 19% from the start of the year. But it finished up 16%, which is an above-average year overall.
Therefore, I think investors are likely to experience a painful hiccup at some point this year. But I believe the outlook remains solid. There are many things to celebrate, including strong infrastructure spending, lower inflation and mortgage rates, and more.
In conclusion, there are trends in the AI space that could contribute to a drop in stocks this year -- those are among my predictions. But I also predict that 2026 will be a good year for a handful of stocks and, most likely, for the market as a whole. Therefore, I intend to continue investing this year through the ups and downs.
Tesla's 11% gain in 2025 came up short of the overall market.
Tesla (TSLA 0.16%) finished 2025 with another winning performance, albeit at a more muted pace. The electric-vehicle (EV) stock was up 11% last year. But over the past decade, as of Jan. 15, it's up a jaw-dropping 3,130%, which helps to explain its massive market cap of $1.4 trillion. This is one of the most valuable companies in the world.
The shares aren't cheap at all, unsurprisingly. Investors who want to own the business must be comfortable paying a price-to-earnings ratio of 292. That's a sky-high valuation that makes it clear that the market has huge expectations about what the future holds.
It's important that the company makes progress in critical areas. Here's are two things Tesla needs to prove in 2026.
Image source: Tesla.
1. Progress with robotaxis is key Tesla is a story stock, thanks to its founder and CEO, Elon Musk. He continues to convince the market that the company will look dramatically different in the future from how it does today. The belief is that Tesla will conquer full self-driving technology and bring its robotaxi service to the masses.
Last year, the business finally took the first step toward this mission when it launched in Austin, Texas, in a very limited capacity. In 2026, Tesla needs to enter new cities and grow adoption, while expanding Cybercab production.
Investors are probably concerned about Nvidia's recent revelation at CES 2026 in Las Vegas that it's working on Alpamayo, its ecosystem of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to support autonomous driving tech. Selling this platform to other carmakers to use could ultimately limit Tesla's ultimate growth potential.
Tesla will be better served by simply focusing on what it can control, and that means further developing its own software. However, progress will depend on having external factors, such as regulations and consumer perception, work to its benefit as well. Tesla will need to take a big step forward in this area in 2026.
Today's Change
(
-0.16
%) $
-0.71
Current Price
$
437.86
2. Focus on the core business Tesla's valuation reflects where the market's focus is, which is the company's autonomous-driving technology ambitions. However, if you view the business with clear eyes today, it's obvious that Tesla is still a manufacturer of EVs. These operations have pumped the brakes, as automotive deliveries slipped 9% year over year in 2025. Margin has also come down.
On the macro front, higher interest rates make new cars more expensive. The expiration of the EV tax credit doesn't help. And when it comes to competition, Tesla has never had to deal with such a crowded market. Getting the core business on better footing, with top-line growth and margin improvements, is what shareholders want to see in 2026.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:098d ago
Backlash after Trump threatens tariffs over Greenland purchase
Donald Trump has sparked backlash after saying he will impose tariffs on eight European countries - including the UK - until the US is allowed to purchase Greenland.
The US president said 10% tariffs would come into effect on 1 February for Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland.
The rate would then climb to 25% on 1 June if no deal was in place for "the complete and total purchase of Greenland" by the United States, Mr Trump wrote in a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform on Saturday.
Trump threatens tariffs over Greenland - as it happened
Image: Pics: Reuters The US president seems to have acted on his previous warning that he would impose tariffs on countries that do not go along with his plan to acquire the Danish territory.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Mr Trump was "completely wrong" for applying tariffs on allies who are "pursuing the collective security of NATO allies", adding that he will be "pursuing" this with the US administration.
French President Emmanuel Macron called the threat of tariffs "unacceptable" and said if implemented Europe would respond in a coordinated manner.
The European Union called an emergency meeting of ambassadors from the 27-member countries for Sunday following Mr Trump's announcement.
'Extraordinary' move by Trump over Greenland
The US president indicated the tariffs were a retaliation after European countries sent military personnel to Greenland in a show of support for the territory.
He wrote: "These countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable."
So far France has sent as many as 15 personnel to the Danish territory, Germany has sent 13 and the UK has sent one military officer.
Spotify This content is provided by Spotify, which may be using cookies and other technologies. To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies. You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spotify cookies or to allow those cookies just once. You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options. Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spotify cookies. To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spotify cookies for this session only.
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈
'Hands off' Greenland protests
The tariffs were announced the same day thousands of people marched through Copenhagen in support of Greenland in the face of threats from Mr Trump.
Demonstrators brandished Danish and Greenlandic flags and signs with slogans including "Make America Smart Again" and "Hands off" as they marched on Saturday afternoon.
Other rallies were planned in Nuuk, the Greenlandic capital, and elsewhere in the Danish kingdom.
Image: Marches in Copenhagen for the 'Hands Off Greenland' protest. Pic: Reuters. "This is important for the whole world," Danish protester Elise Riechie said, as she held Danish and Greenlandic flags.
"There are many small countries. None of them are for sale."
The protests come as a bipartisan US congressional delegation sought to reassure Denmark and Greenland of their support.
Image: Protesters gathered in City Hall Square Copenhagen, Denmark. Pic: Reuters.
Image: Pic: Reuters. Delegation leader senator Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, said he wanted to de-escalate the situation and the US had respect for Denmark and NATO "for all we've done together".
"I hope that the people of the Kingdom of Denmark do not abandon their faith in the American people," Mr Coons said in Copenhagen.
Image: Mr Trump has said Russia and China also have plans to acquire Greenland. Pic: Reuters. Mr Trump has repeatedly argued the US needs to take over Greenland because Russia and China had their own designs on the self-governing territory.
The president's comments stood in stark contrast to Mr Coons's remarks on Saturday.
Read more from Sky News:
Why Venezuela's Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump
Blair 'honoured' to be part of Trump's efforts to rebuild Gaza
Image: Democratic senator Chris Coons said he had respect for Denmark and NATO. Pic: AP "There are no current security threats to Greenland," Mr Coons said.
The White House has not ruled out taking Greenland - which has vast untapped reserves of critical minerals - by force.
"There is almost no better ally to the United States than Denmark," Mr Coons said. "If we do things that cause Danes to question whether we can be counted on as a NATO ally, why would any other country seek to be our ally or believe in our representations?"
Earlier this week, the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland met with US vice president JD Vance and secretary of state Marco Rubio in Washington.
That meeting resulted in an agreement to set up a working group, despite Denmark and the White House offering diverging views on its purpose.
Denmark said this week it was increasing its military presence in Greenland in co-operation with allies.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:208d ago
5 Durable Stocks to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever
These five companies have sound businesses and can form a strong foundation for your diversified investment portfolio.
Investing in the stock market is an excellent way to build sustainable long-term wealth. However, with thousands of stocks to choose from, selecting the right ones to invest in can feel overwhelming.
For investors getting started, look for companies with solid business models that exhibit steady growth over time. You want companies with strong competitive moats and robust balance sheets that enable them to navigate different environments, along with a management team that takes a disciplined approach to capital management.
Companies that meet these criteria tend to be more durable across various economic environments and can provide a strong foundation for your diversified investment portfolio. If this sounds appealing to you, and you have $5,000 available to invest today, here are five durable stocks to consider buying right now.
Image source: Getty Images.
Berkshire Hathaway is a cash-rich business with steady revenue Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A +0.28%)(BRK.B +0.14%) CEO Warren Buffett stepped down at the end of 2025 after an illustrious career as an investor and CEO of the conglomerate. Buffett leaves behind both a legacy and a heavyweight cash-producing conglomerate with private businesses in insurance, utilities, manufacturing, transportation, and retail.
Today's Change
(
0.14
%) $
0.67
Current Price
$
493.29
The company's massive insurance operations include GEICO, General Re, and Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance. This is a key component of the company's steady cash generation and a source of funds to invest in bonds and stocks.
What makes Berkshire compelling right now is its massive $381 billion stockpile of cash and short-term investments, which it can deploy in the event of a stock market downturn. While Buffett won't be calling the shots, he leaves a legacy and a sound business that can continue to thrive for years to come.
Visa's high-margin business scales with global payments Visa (V +0.17%) sits at the center of a global payments network without taking any credit risk. The company earns fees on every transaction while its banking partners manage the potentially risky credit card loans. As a result, Visa operates a high-margin business that enjoys a steady stream of revenue across economic cycles.
What makes it compelling is its massive customer and merchant base worldwide, which creates strong network effects at scale. The company sees growth during economic expansions and provides some resilience to inflation, as it earns a small fee on every transaction, enabling it to scale revenue amid rising prices. As electronic and cross-border payments grow, Visa is a durable company well-positioned to capitalize on this growth.
Chubb generates consistent revenue through sound insurance underwriting Chubb (CB 0.11%) operates a massive property and casualty business that spans the globe. The company has built expertise across a wide range of insurable risks and has done an excellent job of pricing these risks and generating consistent profits from its insurance underwriting operations. As a result, the company has delivered consistent returns and grown its dividend payments for 32 consecutive years.
Today's Change
(
-0.11
%) $
-0.34
Current Price
$
300.77
Its insurance coverage spans commercial, specialty, and personal lines, helping it diversify its risks and avoid reliance on any single source of insurance for income. Not only that, but insurers tend to have pricing power, which allows them to raise prices during periods of inflation.
In addition, the company has a $166 billion investment portfolio primarily invested in U.S. Treasuries, corporate debt, and international bonds, which provides it with further upside during periods of elevated interest rates.
S&P Global is vital to financial markets and has a significant market share S&P Global (SPGI +0.17%) is a key player in global financial markets, providing credit ratings that assess the creditworthiness of corporations, governments, and structured financial products. These ratings influence borrowing costs and capital requirements, with banks relying on them to price and manage credit exposure. Meanwhile, insurers, asset managers, and institutional investors use them to measure risk, allocate capital, and meet regulatory standards.
What gives S&P Global's business stability is its position in the credit rating industry and the difficulty of breaking into it. It takes decades to build a reputation and gain the trust of major financial institutions, and regulations create high barriers to entry. As a result, S&P Global has a dominant 50% market share of the U.S. credit ratings market. As global debt issuance continues to rise, S&P Global is positioned to capitalize on this growth.
BlackRock's business scales as asset prices rise BlackRock (BLK +0.56%) is the world's largest asset manager with over $13.5 trillion in assets under management. The company has built a massive platform through its diverse product offerings, including its growing lineup of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) under the iShares brand.
Today's Change
(
0.56
%) $
6.52
Current Price
$
1163.17
The company has been a key driver of passive investing growth through its ETF products, which enable retail and institutional investors to gain targeted exposure to specific industries, sectors, themes, or other asset classes. The company continues to see inflows into its products, while rising global asset prices are helping boost its assets under management over time. With a steady stream of fees that grow with its asset base, BlackRock is another durable stock to add to your portfolio today.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:408d ago
If You'd Invested $100 In Netflix 10 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
Netflix is one of the most innovative businesses that the world has seen.
Netflix (NFLX 0.06%) is a true pioneer in the internet age. It successfully disrupted the cable TV market, becoming the dominant player in the streaming industry. And investors who have been along for the ride have been rewarded with tremendous returns.
If you invested $100 in Netflix shares 10 years ago, here's how much you'd have today.
Image source: Netflix.
Investors have loved watching Netflix's rise Netflix's stock performance deserves a standing ovation. Over the past decade, the streaming stock has skyrocketed 721% (as of Jan. 15). A hypothetical $100 starting sum would be worth $821 today.
This is what investors get when a company consistently posts strong financial results. Netflix is projected to report $45.1 billion in revenue and $13.3 billion in operating income in 2025, according to analysts. These figures would be 16% and 28% higher, respectively, than what was registered the year before.
Today's Change
(
-0.06
%) $
-0.05
Current Price
$
88.00
Press the pause button Investors who missed the boat might be wondering if it's not too late to get on the Netflix bandwagon. The business is operating at a high level as it finds success in advertising and live events, in addition to its prowess at curating popular content.
But the stock's current valuation does not present an attractive entry point. Unless the price-to-earnings ratio of 37.3 comes down substantially, it's best to continue watching Netflix from the sidelines right now.
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Nextpower has many positives to offer investors, but there's one notable negative to consider as well.
Nextpower (NXT 2.32%) stock has risen 131% over the past year. That said, the stock is currently down more than 11% from its 52-week high. With the stock having slipped below $100 per share, is it time to buy this solar power business? There are good reasons to jump aboard, and one notable reason to stay on the sidelines.
What does Nextpower do? Nextpower provides products and services to the renewable power industry. The technology that underpins its business enables solar panels to track the sun's movement. This is very valuable to customers because it increases the amount of electricity solar panels generate, thereby boosting returns on investment.
Image source: Getty Images.
Roughly 90% of the revenue on the company's income statement is tied to its solar-tracking technology. While highly focused, this isn't inherently a bad thing. Notably, the company's backlog of work stood at roughly $5 billion at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2026. With projected fiscal 2026 revenue of roughly $3.5 billion, it appears the company has more than a year of work lined up. Most of that work is going to come from its core solar tracking technology.
There's even more positive news if you look at the company's balance sheet. At the end of the fiscal second quarter of 2026, Nextpower had no long-term debt and a cash balance of roughly $845 million. To say that it is in a good financial position would be an understatement. It is operating on a rock-solid foundation.
Meanwhile, the stock's valuation doesn't seem outlandish. Nextpower's price-to-sales ratio is 3.9, below its five-year average of 4.4. Its price-to-earnings ratio is 23, below its five-year average of 26. For reference, the average P/E for the S&P 500 index (^GSPC 0.06%) is 28. For a company with a solid pipeline of work ahead of it, and no debt, Nextpower seems fairly reasonably priced.
The big risk is Nextpower's growth plan Between fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2030, Nextpower expects to grow its revenue from $3.4 billion to $5.2 billion. That's an interesting opportunity for investors, but there's one small issue to consider before you buy into what appears to be a fairly low-risk growth stock.
Nextpower's overall sales are projected to grow by more than 50%. However, the sun-tracking business is expected to grow its revenue by only 20% between 2026 and 2030. The rest of the growth is going to be driven by what are largely new businesses.
Today's Change
(
-2.32
%) $
-2.29
Current Price
$
96.36
The new businesses are adjacent to the company's current product and service offerings. Management isn't taking on excessive risk by entering entirely new markets. However, the plan is for the new businesses to drive growth, pushing the sun-tracking technology from roughly 90% of the top line to just around 70% by fiscal 2030. Execution will be vital to monitor as Nextpower looks to broaden its business. Wall Street is likely to be displeased if it falls short of its growth goals, and success in new businesses will be the main driver of growth over the next few years.
Not a bad risk/reward balance Nextpower has the financial strength to withstand some business missteps. So the risk here may not be quite as big as it seems. However, conservative investors need to recognize how heavily the company is relying on its new business lines to support its long-term growth projections. Even though the company is operating a financially strong and profitable business, conservative investors might want to stay on the sidelines. Those willing to make the leap of faith, meanwhile, should pay very close attention to how well the company executes its growth plans.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is one of the best-performing ETFs, but the tech concentration is an issue. Is sticking with the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) better?
Whether you've spent the past few years invested in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO 0.08%) or the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ 0.08%), you've probably been pretty happy with the results.
The latter has delivered especially impressive returns given its heavy tech overweight, but the S&P 500 hasn't been too far behind. Even though it's supposed to be broadly diversified, the S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.06%) has roughly 35% of its portfolio dedicated to tech stocks, much of it in the "Magnificent Seven" names. That makes it kind of a tech-lite index.
Regardless of which you'd choose, there's some danger in being so heavily exposed to just a narrow group of stocks. In a comparison between these two ultra-popular funds, deciding exactly how much tech exposure you want in your portfolio will be a major factor.
Image source: Getty Images.
What is in these two ETFs? We probably don't need to spend a whole lot of time on this since most investors are probably intimately familiar with both. The Vanguard fund targets the S&P 500. The Invesco fund targets the Nasdaq-100.
While the latter is often described as a tech ETF, it isn't (even though it has a significant tilt in that direction). Right now, about 64% of the fund is in tech with another 18% in consumer discretionary, which includes Amazon and Tesla. It's not a pure tech ETF, but it's not far from it.
Today's Change
(
-0.08
%) $
-0.52
Current Price
$
621.26
And that becomes the ultimate factor in deciding between these two funds. Do you want a tech-heavy ETF or something that's a little more broadly spaced out across the entire economy?
Risk and concentration need to be considered If you just look at historical returns, it's easy to see that the Invesco QQQ Trust has been the clear winner. It's returned an average of 20.8% per year over the past decade compared to a 15.9% average for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.
But those numbers alone discount the level of risk taken to achieve that.
Looking at the standard deviation of historical returns over that time frame, the QQQ Trust has been about 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. That turns a clear absolute performance winner into only a marginal risk-adjusted performance winner.
Today's Change
(
-0.08
%) $
-0.53
Current Price
$
636.09
That's fine when there's a big bull market in tech stocks. If the market begins to rotate away from tech, that could turn the QQQ Trust not just into a laggard, but a high-risk laggard.
Plus, by choosing the QQQ Trust over the S&P 500 ETF, you're really making a bet that tech will continue to outperform. In the early stages of 2026, that hasn't been the case.
Which ETF is the better buy? There's no question that the Invesco QQQ Trust has been an elite performer for years. But at this point, I think the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is the better buy.
The market is showing signs of broadening out beyond the tech sector, and that gives the S&P 500 ETF a distinct advantage. If concerns about a slowing economy or a cooling labor market continue to play out, investors may soon shift to defense and away from expensive tech stocks.
Over the long term, a more diversified S&P 500 ETF is the better play.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:158d ago
If You'd Invested $500 in Nvidia Stock 10 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
Nvidia has delivered life-changing returns for long-term shareholders.
Nvidia (NVDA 0.44%) has changed the world, but it didn't get its start as a company focused on artificial intelligence (AI) processors. A decade ago, the AI hardware leader actually generated the vast majority of its revenue from graphics processing units (GPUs) designed for high-end video game performance.
The processing approach used with the company's gaming GPUs wound up offering big advantages for cloud computing, and these advantages became even more pronounced when it came to the training of advanced AI models. Nvidia's processors are the foundation-level hardware pushing the AI revolution forward, and surging demand for its hardware has translated into soaring sales and earnings. It's also made patient investors very wealthy.
Image source: Getty Images.
Nvidia stock has delivered a success story for the ages Over the last decade, Nvidia stock has posted a total return of roughly 26,080%. That means that a $500 investment in the company made 10 years ago would now be worth nearly $131,000. Meanwhile, the stock has delivered a total return of 1,290% over the last year -- good enough to turn a $500 investment into roughly $7,000.
Today's Change
(
-0.44
%) $
-0.82
Current Price
$
186.23
With a market capitalization of approximately $4.55 trillion, Nvidia stands as the world's most valuable company -- and strong demand for AI semiconductors could help it hold on to the crown. Predicting a decade ago that the company would go on to be the biggest player in the AI revolution and the world's largest business would have been virtually impossible, but the stock has delivered life-changing returns for long-term shareholders.
Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:178d ago
S&P 500 Comparison: How Invesco's Equal-Weighted RSP Compares to Vanguard's VOO
Explore how differing sector weights and portfolio structures shape the risk and income profiles of these two S&P 500 ETFs.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO 0.08%) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP 0.26%) both track the S&P 500, yet their approaches differ.
While VOO tracks the traditional market-cap-weighted index, amplifying exposure to the largest names, RSP gives every constituent equal footing. This comparison unpacks how those structural choices affect cost, returns, risk, and portfolio composition.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricVOORSPIssuerVanguardInvescoExpense ratio0.03%0.20%1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09)16.88%11.10%Dividend yield1.13%1.64%Beta (5Y monthly)1.001.00AUM$839 billion$76 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
RSP costs more to own each year than VOO but pays out a slightly higher dividend yield, which could appeal to investors seeking a bit more income from their ETF holding.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricVOORSPMax drawdown (5 y)-24.53%-21.39%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,842$1,517What's insideRSP holds all S&P 500 names, but by giving each company equal weight, it significantly reduces exposure to mega-cap tech stocks. Its sector allocation is more balanced, with technology making up 16% of the fund, industrials at 15%, and financial services at 14%. Each of its holdings represents less than 0.3% of assets, limiting single-stock risk.
VOO holds the same stocks but mirrors the S&P 500’s market-cap weighting, resulting in technology accounting for 35% of assets. Its top positions include Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, with each exceeding 6% of the portfolio.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsBoth RSP and VOO track the S&P 500, but they use different methodologies. With VOO, larger companies make up larger portions of the portfolio. RSP, on the other hand, gives each stock the same weighting regardless of the company's size.
Although both funds hold the same stocks, VOO is the higher-risk, higher-reward investment. Its top three stocks make up just over 20% of the entire portfolio, while RSP's top three holdings account for less than 1% of the fund.
This heavy tilt toward a handful of individual stocks can make VOO more lucrative when those particular companies are thriving, but if they falter, this ETF could also be hit harder. Case in point: VOO has outperformed RSP in both 12-month and five-year total returns, but it's also experienced a steeper max drawdown -- indicating more significant volatility.
Where you choose to invest will depend on your goals and risk tolerance. Those seeking a more stable investment that's less prone to price swings may prefer RSP's equal-weighted approach, while those willing to take on slightly more risk for the chance to earn higher returns may opt for VOO.
GlossaryETF (Exchange-traded fund): A fund that trades on stock exchanges, holding a basket of underlying securities.
Expense ratio: The annual fee a fund charges investors, expressed as a percentage of assets invested.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock divided by its current share price.
Market-cap-weighted index: Index where each company’s weight is based on its total market value, favoring larger companies.
Equal weight: Index or fund approach giving each constituent the same portfolio weight, regardless of company size.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared with the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM (Assets under management): The total market value of all assets a fund or manager oversees.
Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in value over a specific period, showing worst-case loss.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends and distributions, assuming they are reinvested.
Sector allocation: How a fund’s assets are distributed across different industries, such as technology or financials.
Concentration risk: Risk that performance is overly dependent on a small number of holdings or sectors.
Single-stock risk: Risk that poor performance of one company significantly impacts a portfolio’s overall return.
Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-01-18 01:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:248d ago
DIA vs. VUG: Is Dow Stability or Big Tech Growth the Better Choice for Investors?
VUG offers much broader diversification and a larger assets under management (AUM) base, while DIA focuses on just thirty blue-chip stocks DIA comes with a higher expense ratio but delivers a notably higher dividend yield than VUG VUG's tech-heavy portfolio has outperformed DIA over the past five years, but with greater drawdowns during market stress CEO says this is worth 18 Nvidias. Will this make the world's first trillionaire?
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:428d ago
Stellar Launches Community Fund v7.0 to Boost Ecosystem Growth
Launch of Community Fund v7.0 with structured fund distribution.Aims to align resources with development milestones.Focus on ensuring projects reach testnet and mainnet stages. Stellar Development Foundation announced the launch of the Stellar Community Fund v7.0, introducing milestone-based funding to boost ecosystem growth as reported by PANews on January 17th.
By optimizing fund distribution, this upgrade aims to enhance project execution speed, aligning development progress with funding, potentially strengthening Stellar’s native token, XLM, within its network.
Stellar’s Fund Disbursement Model The new fund disbursement model includes lower initial grants with increased payouts during advanced stages. This approach aims to better match development progress, with a focus on ensuring projects reach necessary milestones such as testnet readiness and mainnet launch validation. The fund, operational for over six years, now moves towards incentivizing performance through more targeted financial support.
The community has responded positively to the new fund structure, emphasized by references to “Faster Paths to Funding” on official channels. No direct quotes from key figures like Jed McCaleb or Denelle Dixon have emerged, but the community sentiment is focused on driving more innovative projects. While official statements echo enthusiasm, there’s no specific reaction from external governmental or institutional bodies observed at this stage.
“SCF v7.0 accelerates growth, adds tracks (Integrate, Open, RFP), unified submissions, referrals, Instawards, and post-launch support up to $300K for high-performers.” – Anke Liu, Stellar Development Foundation Stellar’s XLM Token Sees Market Uptick Amid Fund Changes Did you know? The Stellar network has been operational for over six years, focusing on financial inclusion and technological improvements.
According to CoinMarketCap, Stellar’s native token, XLM, currently trades at $0.24, with a market cap of approximately $7.62 billion. The market has witnessed a 4.34% gain over the past 24 hours amidst a 3.43% increase over seven days. Trading volume in the last 24 hours stood at $123.76 million, reflecting a 16.40% decrease in activity. Over the last 90 days, XLM’s value has declined by 26.41%.
Stellar(XLM), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 20:37 UTC on January 17, 2026. Source: CoinMarketCap Insights from the Coincu research team suggest that the new funding structure may significantly impact the pace of financial inclusion projects on the Stellar network. By aligning funding with deliverables, the fund positions developers to contribute to key technological improvements that may further integrate Stellar into broader financial markets. While regulatory responses remain static, the fund’s evolution indicates a trend toward more targeted cryptocurrency development.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Rate this post
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 17:308d ago
Cryptoquant: Bitcoin Demand Conditions Improve Slightly, Bear Market Still Intact
Bitcoin's recent price rebound aligns with historical bear market rally behavior, according to a new insights report published by Cryptoquant and its analysts at cryptoquant.com. Cryptoquant Says Bitcoin Demand Has Not Recovered Materially This week, Cryptoquant researchers note that bitcoin has climbed roughly 21% since Nov.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 17:308d ago
XRP Wave C Push On The Way: What Could Send Price Below $2?
XRP’s price action is trading just above $2, but technical analysis of mid-term charts shows a more complex corrective structure for what comes next.
According to a technical analysis shared by CasiTrades on X, XRP may still have one more bullish push ahead before the structure turns lower. The chart showing the analysis outlines a developing Elliott Wave sequence that could first lift XRP’s price higher, then open the door to a breakdown if support levels fail.
B Wave Dips Hint At Coming Wave C Surge Technical analysis of XRP’s price action on the 1-hour candlestick timeframe chart by CasiTrade proposes an interesting outlook that shows XRP might end up correcting below $2 in the coming days. This correction, however, will only play out after XRP finishes a Wave C move that takes its price above $2.2.
The wave C, in turn, is expected to play out after the recent pullback to $2.03 in the past 48 hours. According to CasiTrades, XRP’s recent pullback unfolded as a deeper B wave than initially expected. Instead of forming a tight consolidation, price traced out a full ABC move and fell into the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement around $2.09. This depth, however, does not invalidate the structure. Such a move is consistent with a B wave in the Elliott Wave theory.
This retracement coincides with clustered Fibonacci levels and prior intraday support, and the next possible move from here is the next leg higher within the larger Wave 2 structure.
Now that the B wave is likely in place, the attention is towards the anticipated C wave push. CasiTrades identifies the golden retracement near $2.26 as the primary upside target, with a possible extension into the $2.28 region where the golden pocket and the 1.236 extension converge. The chart highlights this zone as a dense resistance area, reinforced by prior reaction highs and overlapping Fibonacci projections.
XRPUSD currently trading at $2.06. Chart: TradingView This C wave is expected to subdivide into five smaller waves. If this plays out as expected, XRP’s price action should feel bullish through its clean subwave development. However, the way price behaves as it approaches and reacts to the $2.26 to $2.28 band will be critical for confirming the broader outlook and if a correction is next.
XRP Price Chart. Source: @CasiTrades on X
A Post-C Rejection Could Drag XRP To $1.65 The current focus is on a possible push higher, but there’s still a downside risk after the C wave is complete. The analyst expects a rejection that could become the beginning of a larger Wave 3 move to the downside after XRP reaches the projected levels around $2.26 to $2.28.
If that rejection materializes cleanly, XRP could begin a sustained move lower, with the macro support region around $1.65 coming back into focus. Confirmation of this bearish path, however, depends on how the C subwaves form and whether price delivers a decisive rejection.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 17:348d ago
Ripple and UC Berkeley Launch UDAX Accelerator to Scale XRP Ledger Startups
TLDR:Pilot Program Delivers Tangible Results for Participating StartupsStartups Report Strong Growth in Key Performance MetricsProgram Strengthens Technical and Strategic Foundations Nine startups completed the inaugural UDAX pilot, reporting 67% average product maturity increase over six weeks. WaveTip migrated to XRPL Mainnet during the program while X-Card onboarded $1.5 million in inventory partnerships. CRX Digital Assets grew tokenized volume from $39 million to $58 million using Ripple’s global payments network. Participating teams achieved 92% average growth in fundraising confidence through mentorship and VC connections. Ripple has partnered with the University of California, Berkeley to establish the University Digital Asset Xcelerator (UDAX) program.
The initiative aims to transform academic blockchain innovations into enterprise-ready solutions built on the XRP Ledger.
Nine startups completed the inaugural six-week pilot cohort in fall 2025, receiving technical mentorship and venture capital connections.
Pilot Program Delivers Tangible Results for Participating Startups The UDAX – UC Berkeley pilot brought together nine teams working across diverse sectors including tokenized capital markets, decentralized insurance, and creator economy platforms.
Ripple engineers collaborated with UC Berkeley faculty and industry experts to guide founders through intensive development and fundraising preparation.
The program concluded with a demo day at Ripple’s San Francisco headquarters, attended by XRPL developers, company leadership, and representatives from 13 venture capital firms.
Several teams achieved significant milestones during the accelerator. WaveTip successfully migrated its Twitch streamer tipping platform to the XRPL Mainnet and launched on the Chrome Web Store.
X-Card onboarded over $1.5 million in inventory while establishing partnerships with merchant communities serving thousands of collectors.
These outcomes demonstrated the program’s ability to accelerate product development and market entry.
Ripple announced the program through its official social media channels, highlighting the initiative’s focus on scaling enterprise solutions using XRP.
Introducing the University Digital Asset Xcelerator (UDAX). 🎓@UCBerkeley and Ripple's University Blockchain Research Initiative launched a pilot program to accelerate the transition from academic innovation to institutional XRP utility: https://t.co/KMyVjPvXT2
The UDAX – UC…
— Ripple (@Ripple) January 16, 2026
The announcement emphasized the program’s role in connecting founders with Ripple’s engineering team and global venture capitalists.
This direct access to technical resources proved instrumental for participating startups.
Startups Report Strong Growth in Key Performance Metrics BlockBima tripled its active user base while building automated climate-risk microinsurance for vulnerable communities.
The team credited the program’s fundraising mentorship, particularly guidance from Andrea Barrica, as their most valuable takeaway.
Participating teams reported an average 67% increase in product maturity and 92% growth in fundraising confidence by the program’s conclusion.
CRX Digital Assets refined its strategy for exporting Brazilian credit offerings to international markets through Ripple’s global payments network.
The company increased its tokenized volume from $39 million to $58 million during the accelerator.
Meanwhile, Blockroll launched stablecoin-backed virtual cards for African freelancers, leveraging RLUSD momentum to enable global financial access.
Blockroll CEO Sadiq Isiaka explained the platform’s strategic direction for African markets. He noted that RLUSD enables the company to offer institutionally accepted stablecoins that streamline remittance settlements from the United States to Sub-Saharan Africa.
The integration unlocks financial access use cases including stablecoin-backed debit cards with global functionality and wealth-building opportunities through stablecoin yields and tokenized U.S. stocks.
Program Strengthens Technical and Strategic Foundations Additional cohort participants achieved notable progress across various domains. Spout finalized a complex equity tokenization model and secured multiple venture capital meetings through one-on-one mentorship sessions.
EXFIL doubled its active user base and established over 50 strategic relationships while refining its real-time blockchain threat intelligence platform for investors.
Mintara Labs validated its go-to-market strategy for crypto-bank insurance products, generating revenue and underwriting initial deposits during the six-week period.
WellArrive refined its vision into a strategic dual-sided marketplace model, addressing data fragmentation issues for researchers and users while developing a robust go-to-market strategy.
The program represents Ripple’s continued commitment to its University Blockchain Research Initiative, which connects academic research with practical blockchain applications.
Future cohorts will build on the pilot’s success, supporting founders developing solutions for the Internet of Value through technical expertise and entrepreneurial resources from leading research institutions.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:008d ago
Bitcoin Demand Is Picking Up, But The Bear Market Still Holds
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
The price of Bitcoin took the crypto community by surprise when it broke the resistance level around $94,000 over the past week. This has sparked questions on whether this was just a mere bear market rally or the bull run is back on track. Here’s what CryptoQuant, which called the bear market earlier, has to say about the latest Bitcoin price rally.
BTC Still In Bear Market Despite Improving Conditions: CryptoQuant On Friday, January 16, blockchain analytics firm CryptoQuant revealed in its latest report that the Bitcoin demand conditions are becoming less negative following the recent rally above $97,000. This on-chain observation comes a few weeks after the firm said the BTC apparent demand — at the time — was pointing to the start of a bear market.
The confirmation of the bear market came after the price of Bitcoin fell below the 365-day moving average — a level that has historically determined bull and bear phases. However, the premier cryptocurrency has been on an upward trajectory since breaking beneath this level, up by approximately 21% since late November 2025.
Source: CryptoQuant In its research report, CryptoQuant noted that while the price of BTX is approaching the 365-day moving average, it has yet to reclaim the technical level, which currently lies around $101,000. The analytics firm further mentioned acts as a “regime boundary” during bear markets — as seen in past cycles, triggering price rejections before renewed downside.
In addition to the technical hurdles, CryptoQuant noted that while the Bitcoin demand conditions have improved “at the margin”, they still signal market weakness. “US spot indicators such as the Coinbase Premium briefly turned positive, while U.S. ETFs merely paused net selling after offloading ~54K BTC in November, rather than showing sustained accumulation,” the firm added.
CryptoQuant also highlighted that on-chain spot demand continues to decline, with apparent demand down by about 67,000 BTC over the past 30 days. Meanwhile, the Bitcoin spot exchange-traded fund inflows have broadly remained below levels often correlated with durable bullish market recoveries.
At the same time, the rising BTC exchange inflows do not spread optimism but rather increase downside risk. Data from CryptoQuant shows that transfers to centralized exchanges climbed to a 7-day average of approximately 39,000 BTC, the highest level since late November. According to the firm, this is a tell-tale sign of increasing sell-side pressure after relief rallies.
Going by this, it appears that while the market conditions are somewhat improving favorably for price, Bitcoin is still in the bear cycle that started less than two months ago.
Bitcoin Price At A Glance As of this writing, the price of BTC stands at around $95,200, reflecting no significant movement in the past 24 hours.
The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView Featured image from iStock, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:008d ago
$31M ZEC whale inflows: Is Zcash ready to break $439?
Zcash [ZEC] has experienced a period of structural weakness over the past week following leadership challenges. Over this time, Zcash has dropped from a local high of $528 to a low of $400, reflecting strong bearish pressure.
At the time of writing, ZEC traded at $402, after slightly declining by 1.21% on the daily charts. Interestingly, this period of market weakness created a perfect buying window for whales.
Zcash whale adds $13M in ZEC After ZEC dropped to a low of $361 a week ago, whale activity collapsed alongside it. Thus, whales pulled capital, reduced exposure, and started selling.
At press time, the Whale Hunter Indicator on TradingView showed a 10.24% downside pressure on ZEC from whales as they started rising.
Shortly after, large entities rushed back into the market and attempted to defend higher levels. As such, the whale momentum index rebounded from 416 to 529, suggesting a whale comeback in the market.
Source: TradingView
Amid this shift, on-chain monitors observed one major whale purchase. According to Onchain Lens, a newly created wallet withdrew 76,661 ZEC, worth $31.65 million, from Binance.
Such a massive accumulation during a period of market conviction showed whales jumping to accumulate ZEC at a discount.
Furthermore, exchange activities further echoed this rising whale demand in the market. According to CoinGlass, Zcash’s Spot Netflow has been negative for five consecutive days, suggesting increased dip-buying.
Source: CoinGlass
At press time, Spot Netflow was -$4.35 million, reflecting higher outflows, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.
Thus, investors defied the market trend and bought ZEC in silence, which explains the recovery from the $361 dip earlier in the week. Often, increased accumulation accelerates upward momentum, a prelude to higher prices.
Can whale buys help struggling ZEC? In past instances, Zcash gained significantly when whales increased demand but slipped whenever they sold.
This time, however, recent whale purchases have not boosted ZEC’s price. Instead, the altcoin fell from $411 to a low of $411, highlighting ongoing structural weakness.
Source: TradingView
In fact, the altcoin’s Stochastic RSI made a bearish crossover and dropped to 41, at press time, edging into the bearish zone.
At the same time, ZEC slipped below its short-term moving averages, the 20- and 50-day EMAs further validating bearish pressure.
Such market conditions leave Zcash in a risky position for more losses despite whale accumulation. Thus, if the current trend persists, ZEC will breach the $400 support level, heading towards $392.
Conversely, if whale accumulation translates positively, it could boost the altcoin’s upside momentum and potentially flip EMA50 at $439.
Final Thoughts Zcash whale wallet purchased 76,661 ZEC tokens worth $31.65 million. ZEC continues to face bearish pressure and risks a dip back below $400.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:018d ago
Solana Price Faces Crash Risk Despite 8 Million New Investors
Solana Price Faces Crash Risk Despite 8 Million New InvestorsSolana added over 8 million new addresses, signaling rapid network adoption growth.Legacy holders’ selling pressure is outweighing fresh demand from new investors.Ascending wedge pattern signals potential 9.5% correction toward $129.Solana price continues to trend higher overall, but near-term risks are building. SOL has formed an ascending wedge since the start of the month, a pattern that often precedes a pullback.
Despite strong investor participation, the setup suggests a potential dip that could undermine recent bullish efforts.
Solana Holders Counter Each OtherOn-chain activity shows strong network growth. Since the beginning of the month, the number of addresses conducting transactions on Solana has surged sharply. At its peak, more than 8 million new addresses joined the network within a single 24-hour period.
Sponsored
Sponsored
This increase signals substantial demand for SOL. New addresses typically bring fresh capital, boosting liquidity and network usage. Such growth reflects Solana’s expanding ecosystem appeal, driven by DeFi activity, memecoins, and high-throughput applications attracting new participants.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
Solana New Addresses. Source: GlassnodeDespite rising network adoption, macro momentum tells a different story. Exchange position change data indicates existing holders are exerting a stronger influence on price action. Buying pressure from long-term participants has weakened, offsetting the impact of new capital inflows.
As buying momentum fades, selling pressure is beginning to dominate. This shift suggests that established SOL holders are reducing exposure or preparing to sell. When legacy supply outweighs new demand, price weakness often follows, increasing the probability of a breakdown from the current structure.
Solana Exchange Position Change. Source: GlassnodeSOL Price Is Looking at a CorrectionSolana price trades near $144 at the time of writing, moving within an ascending wedge formed over recent days. This bearish continuation pattern projects a potential 9.5% decline, placing the downside target near $129 if the structure resolves lower.
The projected drop aligns with weakening momentum indicators. A confirmed breakdown would likely push SOL toward $136 initially. Losing that support would expose the $130 level, where buyers may attempt to stabilize the price amid broader market caution.
Solana Price Analysis. Source: TradingViewStill, the bearish scenario is not guaranteed. If investor sentiment improves and selling pressure eases, SOL could rebound from the wedge’s lower trend line. A move above $146 would signal renewed strength. Further upside could carry Solana toward $151, invalidating the bearish outlook.
Disclaimer
In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:058d ago
XRP Funding Rates Turn Negative as ETF Vaults Hold Over 800 Million Tokens
TLDR: XRP funding rate stands at -0.00323 with both 30-day and 50-day moving averages trending sharply downward currently. Negative funding spikes historically mark local bottoms and precede relief rallies rather than sustained selling pressure. Over 800 million XRP tokens now locked in ETF vaults, approaching the 1 billion milestone mark in coming period. Short-heavy positioning creates favorable conditions as probability of upside movement exceeds downside breakdown risk. XRP funding rates have turned negative, signaling short-heavy positioning in the derivatives market.
This structure historically precedes relief rallies rather than continued downside pressure. Market analysts now view the current setup as constructive for potential upward movement in the near term.
Funding Rate Patterns Point to Compressed Market Structure The funding rate for XRP currently stands at approximately -0.00323, with both the 30-day and 50-day simple moving averages trending downward.
This configuration indicates that short positions dominate the leveraged trading landscape. When funding rates spike positively and form sharp peaks, prices typically move sideways or pull back sharply.
The increasing cost of maintaining long positions raises the probability of a long squeeze during these periods.
Source: Cryptoquant
These positive spikes have functioned as warnings of market overheating rather than signals for trend continuation.
Conversely, sudden negative spikes in funding rates often mark local price bottoms. When the funding rate SMAs break sharply lower, short positions accumulate and market sentiment turns excessively pessimistic.
Strong negative funding has historically triggered short-term relief rallies as prices rebound from these compressed levels.
The absence of excessive optimism in current market conditions creates a favorable environment for upside moves.
Sharp downside movements appear unlikely in the short term given the current positioning. Any pullbacks would more likely represent shallow retracements aimed at liquidity collection rather than sustained selling pressure.
ETF Vault Holdings Approach Milestone as Technical Setup Improves According to ChartNerd, over 800 million XRP tokens are now locked in ETF vaults. The analyst noted that the 1 billion mark no longer seems distant, describing this development as inevitable.
This accumulation in institutional vehicles occurs alongside the technical setup suggested by funding rate data.
The current funding data presents no obstacle to upward price movement for XRP. Instead, the structure appears to be building groundwork for potential advances after a period of market compression.
While no clear signal for a major rally has emerged, the probability of upside movement exceeds that of a downside breakdown.
If funding rates begin turning positive from current levels, the price may respond with upward momentum.
The combination of short-heavy positioning and growing ETF vault holdings creates an interesting dynamic. Leveraged traders have positioned for further declines while institutional accumulation continues.
This divergence between derivatives positioning and spot demand often resolves with short covering as bears exit their positions. The technical framework supports this scenario more than continued weakness at present levels.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:378d ago
Ethereum Derivatives Momentum Surges While Binance Records Heavy Selling Pressure
TLDR: Ethereum derivatives power index climbed to +0.088 on January 16, matching October levels when ETH traded above $4,600 Binance recorded -$440M in net taker volume over two days, signaling potential institutional distribution patterns The October parallel proved bearish as ETH dropped nearly 40% following similar derivative momentum readings Rising momentum combined with negative net volume creates rare configuration historically preceding major price moves Ethereum’s derivatives market shows diverging signals as momentum indicators climb while Binance registers heavy negative net taker volume.
The composite derivatives power index recorded a 30-day change of +0.088 on January 16, matching levels last seen in early October when ETH traded above $4,600.
Market participants now face mounting selling pressure despite improving technical momentum across futures platforms.
Derivatives Momentum Reaches Critical October Levels Binance’s Ethereum futures power index has surged to levels not observed since October 7, when the asset commanded prices exceeding $4,600.
The 30-day change metric, which combines price action with derivatives momentum and liquidity factors, hit +0.088 points this week.
This composite indicator measures trend strength beyond simple price movements by incorporating open interest shifts and volume patterns.
The October parallel carries particular weight for market analysts tracking historical patterns. When the index previously reached 0.083 points in early fall, Ethereum entered a steep correction phase.
The subsequent selloff erased nearly 40% of the asset’s value over the following weeks as buyers exhausted momentum.
Current readings suggest derivatives traders have rebuilt positioning strength despite recent price volatility.
However, the index alone does not confirm directional bias. Additional metrics reveal growing tension between bullish momentum and bearish execution flows across major exchanges.
Heavy Selling Pressure Emerges on Binance Platform Net taker volume on Binance turned sharply negative as January trading progressed, signaling potential distribution by large holders.
On January 15, the platform recorded -257 million USD in net taker volume through market sell orders. The following day maintained negative territory at -183 million USD, extending the pattern of aggressive selling.
These negative readings typically indicate institutional participants opening short positions or closing profitable long exposure.
Large investors often use market orders to execute sizable trades quickly, leaving a clear footprint in net taker data.
The sustained selling over consecutive sessions suggests coordinated activity rather than random liquidations.
Open interest changes remain relatively stable despite the selling pressure, indicating new shorts may be offsetting closed longs.
This dynamic creates a precarious balance where any catalyst could trigger rapid moves in either direction.
Traders monitoring these flows watch for acceleration or reversal signals that might confirm the dominant trend.
The combination of rising derivatives power and negative net volume presents a rare configuration that historically precedes major price moves.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 18:548d ago
Cathie Wood Says Bitcoin Is Emerging as a Key Institutional Portfolio Diversifier
Bitcoin could take on a much larger role in institutional portfolios as investors increasingly look for assets that improve diversification and risk-adjusted returns, according to Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood. In her 2026 market outlook, Wood described bitcoin as a compelling diversification tool due to its historically low correlation with traditional asset classes such as equities, bonds, and gold.
Wood emphasized that bitcoin’s correlation profile makes it stand out among major assets. Using Ark Invest data, she noted that since 2020, bitcoin has shown weaker correlations with stocks, fixed income, and even gold than those assets show with each other. For example, bitcoin’s correlation with the S&P 500 was around 0.28, significantly lower than the roughly 0.79 correlation between the S&P 500 and real estate investment trusts. This dynamic suggests that bitcoin may help reduce overall portfolio volatility while enhancing returns.
According to Wood, bitcoin should be taken seriously by asset allocators seeking higher returns per unit of risk. She argued that its growing adoption, maturing market structure, and unique supply characteristics make it more than just a speculative asset. Wood has long been bullish on bitcoin and continues to project a price target of approximately $1.5 million by 2030, reinforcing her view of its long-term potential.
However, not all institutional strategists share the same outlook. Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood recently reversed his stance on bitcoin, removing a previous 10% allocation from his model portfolio and replacing it with gold. He cited concerns that future advances in quantum computing could eventually pose risks to Bitcoin’s blockchain security, potentially undermining its appeal as a long-term store of value.
Despite this shift, Cathie Wood’s position aligns with a broader trend among major financial institutions. Morgan Stanley’s Global Investment Committee has recommended an “opportunistic” bitcoin allocation of up to 4%, while Bank of America has approved similar guidance for wealth advisors. CF Benchmarks has also highlighted bitcoin’s ability to improve portfolio efficiency through diversification, and Brazil’s largest asset manager, Itaú Asset Management, has endorsed a modest bitcoin allocation as a hedge against currency and market shocks.
As institutional interest continues to evolve, bitcoin’s role in diversified portfolios appears to be gaining momentum.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:008d ago
Why Immutable traders are betting long as IMX tests $0.30
As the crypto market recovers, Immutable [IMX] has drawn fresh attention from traders. At the time of writing, IMX was up 9.50%, trading at $0.293.
This price gain is fueling expectations of further upside, supported by strong market interest. Trading volume surged 65% to $35.48 million, underscoring active participation.
The combination of rising price and volume suggests that both traders and investors are backing IMX’s current trend.
IMX price action and key level to watch AMBCrypto’s technical analysis on the daily chart shows that today’s 9.50% gain in the IMX price has successfully formed a bullish cup-and-handle pattern and is now on the verge of a breakout.
Source: TradingView
Based on the current price action, if IMX’s upside momentum continues and the price breaks above the neckline at the $0.30 level, it could open the door for a further 16% rally toward $0.351 in the coming days.
IMX’s bullish thesis can only be validated if the asset clears the neckline; otherwise, history may repeat, and the price could see a reversal, as it has in the past.
At the same time, the price has already surpassed the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), with IMX hovering above it, at press time. This indicates that the asset is shifting toward a short-term uptrend and is a bullish sign for IMX holders.
However, the momentum indicator Average Directional Index (ADX), which measures trend strength, has reached 21.17, below the key threshold of 25, indicating weak directional momentum.
Are IMX traders turning bullish? Besides the price action, data from the derivatives platform CoinGlass indicates that intraday traders are following the current trend.
According to the IMX Exchange Liquidation Map, traders are heavily favoring long-leveraged positions, which continue to rise compared to short-leveraged positions.
Source: CoinGlass
At press time, $0.276 on the downside and $0.30 on the upside are the two key levels attracting strong trader interest. Data shows that over the past 24 hours, traders have built $384.44K worth of long positions and $305.85K worth of short positions.
These positions and intraday trader bets indicate that short-term market sentiment is quite bullish. However, $0.30 continues to act as a strong resistance level.
Final Thoughts IMX gained 9.50%, positioning itself for a potential 16% rally, though it is currently facing resistance. Despite the bullish outlook, the technical indicator ADX suggests that IMX’s current trend remains weak, as its value is below 25.
Vivaan Acharya is a Crypto-Economist and Journalist at AMBCrypto who brings a rare depth of financial and economic expertise to the world of digital assets. He holds a Master’s in Economics from the prestigious University of Delhi and has over five years of experience analyzing technology and financial markets. His foray into the blockchain space began in 2018, marked by his prescient Master's thesis, "Payments and Stablecoin Integration in Banking," which showcased his early understanding of crypto's potential to disrupt traditional finance. Before specializing in crypto, Vivaan honed his skills in rigorous data and technical chart analysis at a major national financial daily, where he covered corporate earnings and market trends. At AMBCrypto, Vivaan applies this powerful blend of classical economic training and seasoned financial journalism to his work. He is an expert in: 1. Bitcoin and Altcoin Market Analysis 2. Stablecoin Ecosystem Development, and 3 Emerging Crypto Regulations. Known for his clear, no-nonsense approach, Vivaan translates robust research into straightforward, actionable insights. He is dedicated to demystifying the complexities of blockchain finance, empowering readers to confidently navigate the rapidly evolving digital economy.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:008d ago
Ethereum Maintains Structural Strength Despite Resistance Near $3,400
Ethereum continues to show resilience, holding its ground above key support levels even as price faces firm resistance near the $3,400 zone. The ability to sustain strength after recent gains highlights improving market structure, suggesting that buyers remain in control. As long as ETH stays supported above its critical trend levels, the broader upside narrative remains intact despite near-term hesitation.
Daily Bull Market Support Band Holds As Key Reversal Zone Luca, in a recent ETH update shared on X, pointed out that Ethereum’s market structure has strengthened considerably over the past several days. The price has been able to hold above the 1D Bull Market Support Band, a level that has acted as a reliable reversal zone multiple times over the last couple of months. This sustained hold suggests improving market confidence and a reduction in immediate downside risk.
Alongside this structural improvement, ETH successfully reclaimed the 0.618 Fibonacci point of interest around the $3,100 region. This level is often viewed as a critical threshold in corrective phases, and holding above it typically signals that buyers are gaining the upper hand.
Source: Chart from Luca on X Despite the positive developments, Ethereum has not moved higher without hesitation. ETH’s price recently faced rejection near the 0.5 Fibonacci level around $3,400, an outcome Luca noted was largely expected. Historically, this area has acted as a significant decision point, often attracting selling pressure and temporary pullbacks before the market decides on its next direction.
Looking forward, Luca believes the overall outlook remains constructive as long as ETH continues to trade above the 1D Bull Market Support Band and the 0.618 Fibonacci level. Maintaining these supports would keep the path open for renewed upside attempts, even if short-term consolidations occur, and the analyst’s positioning remains unchanged.
ETH Above Daily 200MA, Structure Remains Constructive According to a recent post by Daan Crypto Trades, Ethereum is still advancing gradually while respecting the Daily 200-day moving average against Bitcoin. This type of slow, methodical grind often signals strength beneath the surface, suggesting that buyers remain in control even without aggressive momentum.
The analyst explained that prolonged consolidations and steady climbs like this typically resolve with an acceleration phase. Should ETH break out with stronger upside momentum, it could serve as a trigger for renewed interest across the altcoin market, helping lift sentiment and price action.
However, the structure remains conditional. Holding the Daily 200MA, highlighted in purple, is critical to maintaining this constructive setup. In parallel, Bitcoin must stay above the $94,000 level to maintain the broader low-timeframe bullish structure. As long as these conditions are met, the path of least resistance continues to favor further upside.
ETH trading at $3,294 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com
Skip to the content Home Altcoins News Solana Faces Potential Price Correction Amid Rising Investor Activity
Julie Binoche January 18, 2026
Solana’s price trend remains upward, but concerns over short-term risks are emerging. Since the beginning of January, Solana (SOL) has formed an ascending wedge, a chart pattern that often indicates a possible pullback. Despite an influx of new investors, this setup could challenge recent bullish movements.
Significant on-chain activity highlights Solana’s network expansion. The number of addresses conducting transactions has sharply increased, with more than 8 million new addresses joining in a single day. This surge suggests increased demand for Solana, fueled by its appeal in decentralized finance (DeFi), memecoins, and high-throughput applications.
While network adoption is on the rise, broader market forces paint a different picture. Data on exchange position changes shows that existing holders are playing a more substantial role in influencing SOL’s price. The buying momentum from long-term participants has diminished, counteracting the effects of new capital inflows. As buying pressure weakens, selling pressure is gaining traction, indicating that some established SOL holders might be reducing their holdings or preparing to sell.
Solana’s current trading price is around $144, with the ascending wedge suggesting a potential 9.5% decline. This would place the downside target at approximately $129 if the pattern resolves lower. A confirmed breakdown might initially push SOL to $136, with further risks towards the $130 level if the support fails. This scenario reflects weakening momentum indicators.
However, the bearish outcome is not certain. If investor sentiment improves and selling pressure decreases, Solana could rebound from the lower trend line of the wedge. An upward move beyond $146 could indicate renewed strength, potentially leading Solana to reach $151, thus invalidating the bearish projection.
The increase in new addresses is significant. It reflects Solana’s growing ecosystem, which is attracting new participants. However, the interplay between new demand and the actions of current holders will be a key factor in determining the price direction in the near term.
No immediate comment was available from Solana’s representatives about these developments. As the market evaluates these dynamics, attention will focus on how Solana’s price responds to these pressures.
Post Views: 1
Julie Binoche Julie is a renowned crypto journalist with a passion for uncovering the latest trends in blockchain and cryptocurrency. With over a decade of experience, she has become a trusted voice in the industry, providing insightful analysis and in-depth reporting on groundbreaking developments. Julie's work has been featured in leading publications, solidifying her reputation as a leading expert in the field.
Crypto newsletter Get the latest Crypto & Blockchain News in your inbox.
2026-01-18 00:288d ago
2026-01-17 19:068d ago
Steak ‘n Shake Buys $10M in Bitcoin to Power Its “Bitcoin-to-Burger” Strategy
Steak ‘n Shake has taken a bold step in corporate crypto adoption by purchasing $10 million worth of Bitcoin, significantly expanding its strategy of converting fast-food revenue into a corporate cryptocurrency treasury. The move represents the latest phase of the company’s “Bitcoin-to-Burger” initiative, a financial model that directly channels operational cash flow into digital assets.
Launched in May 2025, the initiative integrates Bitcoin accumulation into Steak ‘n Shake’s daily business operations. By accepting Bitcoin payments and actively marketing to crypto-focused consumers, the 90-year-old restaurant chain aims to modernize its capital structure while attracting a new, tech-savvy demographic. Management has described the approach as a “self-sustaining system,” where improvements in food quality drive higher sales, which in turn fund additional Bitcoin purchases.
According to internal company data, the strategy has delivered measurable results. Steak ‘n Shake reported double-digit same-store sales growth in 2025, outperforming competitors across the fast-food industry. The company attributes this growth largely to its Bitcoin-focused branding and payment strategy, which helped increase customer engagement and overall revenue. Executives have stated that becoming a “Bitcoin company” provided a meaningful boost to the business and enabled further reinvestment into product quality.
Notably, Steak ‘n Shake has committed to a Bitcoin-only philosophy. Despite a recent corporate poll showing that 53% of respondents supported adding Ethereum as a payment option, leadership rejected the idea. The decision underscores a Bitcoin maximalist stance designed to build strong loyalty among a specific, ideologically aligned customer base.
The company’s Bitcoin integration also extends to its workforce. In October 2024, Steak ‘n Shake updated its payroll systems to allow approximately 10,000 employees to receive a portion of their wages in Bitcoin. This move reflects management’s view of Bitcoin as a long-term store of value comparable to traditional fiat currencies.
Founded in 1934, Steak ‘n Shake operates hundreds of locations across the United States and internationally. Its growing Bitcoin treasury positions the chain as a rare outlier in the traditional restaurant industry, attempting to future-proof a legacy brand by tying its long-term financial strategy to the performance of the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 14:158d ago
Trump plans 10% tariffs on European countries over Greenland: What it means for markets.
Trump plans 10% tariffs on European countries over Greenland: What it means for markets.
Site Search
Search Results
Symbols
No results found
All NewsArticlesVideoPodcasts0
Results
No Results Found
Authors
No results found
Sections
No results found
Columns
No results found
HomeEconomy & PoliticsTrump levels latest threat at Europe as Supreme Court decision on his tariffs loomPublished: Jan. 17, 2026 at 2:15 p.m. ET
President Donald Trump said he would slap 10% tariffs on imports from eight European countries beginning next month, as he ramps up a pressure campaign on Denmark to sell Greenland to the U.S.
Denmark, which has sovereignty over Greenland, will be hit with the 10% levy on the goods it sells to the U.S. starting Feb. 1, Trump said in a lengthy post on his social-media network. Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland will also face 10% tariffs, Trump wrote, and threatened an even higher levy. He said all those countries would be subject to 25% tariffs on June 1 “until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”
About the Author
Robert Schroeder is the Washington bureau chief for MarketWatch. Follow him on X @mktwrobs.
Joy Wiltermuth is a news editor and senior markets reporter based in New York.
Partner CenterIntraday Data provided by
FACTSET
and subject to
terms of use.
Historical and current end-of-day data provided by
FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 14:308d ago
VUG vs. RSP: How Tech-Heavy Growth Compares to Balanced S&P 500 Diversification
Explore how sector balance, income potential, and risk profiles set these two popular ETFs apart for different investor needs.
The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG 0.02%) tracks the performance of large-cap U.S. growth stocks, dominated by technology. By contrast, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP 0.26%) equally weights all S&P 500 companies, leading to broader sector balance.
This comparison highlights how each fund’s approach affects returns, risk, and income potential, helping investors decide which one is best for their portfolio.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricVUGRSPIssuerVanguardInvescoExpense ratio0.04%0.20%1-yr return (as of Jan. 13, 2026)21.14%13.23%Dividend yield0.41%1.64%Beta (5Y monthly)1.211.00AUM$352 billion$76 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
VUG charges a much lower expense ratio, appealing to investors looking to minimize fees. However, RSP has a clear advantage in terms of income, with its substantially higher dividend yield.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricVUGRSPMax drawdown (5 y)-35.61%-21.39%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,934$1,501What's insideRSP holds 504 stocks, allocating roughly equal weight to each S&P 500 stock. It tilts toward technology (making up 16% of total assets), industrials (15%), and financial services (14%), with all of its top holdings making up less than 0.25% of its portfolio. The fund has a nearly 23-year track record, offering diversified exposure without favoring mega-cap stocks.
By contrast, VUG holds just 160 stocks and packs 51% of its portfolio into technology, 15% into communication services, and 14% into consumer cyclical. Its top three positions -- Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft -- together make up more than 32% of assets, making it far more concentrated in a few large companies.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsVUG and RSP offer distinct approaches that appeal to different types of investors, depending on their goals.
RSP is far more diversified, with over three times as many holdings and a less pronounced tilt toward any one industry. While tech is the most prominent sector in both funds, it makes up just 16% of RSP's portfolio compared to over 50% for VUG.
Also, RSP's top three holdings combined make up less than 1% of its overall portfolio, while VUG's top three holdings comprise nearly one-third of its total assets. VUG's heavy focus on a small number of tech stocks increases its risk substantially compared to RSP, but it also sets it up for more lucrative earnings.
Case in point: VUG has significantly outperformed RSP in both 12-month and five-year total returns. But with a higher beta and deeper max drawdown, it's also experienced more severe price swings in those periods.
In terms of fees and income, each fund has an advantage. RSP's expense ratio is five times higher than VUG's, which adds up for long-term investors. However, RSP also offers a significantly higher dividend yield, which can help recoup some of the money investors are paying in fees.
Where you choose to invest will depend on what you're looking to achieve with an ETF. VUG is more focused on tech-heavy growth with a history of higher returns, but it comes with a greater risk of volatility. RSP is more stable, but its earning potential may be more limited.
GlossaryETF: Exchange-traded fund that holds a basket of assets and trades like a stock on exchanges.
Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its current share price, expressed as a percentage.
Beta: Measure of a fund’s volatility compared with the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of all assets a fund manages.
Max drawdown: Largest peak-to-trough decline in a fund’s value over a specified period.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends and distributions, assuming reinvestment.
Equal weight index: Index where each constituent receives the same weighting, regardless of company size.
Sector concentration: Degree to which a fund’s holdings are focused in a small number of industries or sectors.
Large-cap: Companies with relatively large market values, typically tens or hundreds of billions of dollars.
Growth stocks: Companies expected to grow earnings or revenues faster than the overall market, often reinvesting profits.
Drawdown: Decline from a portfolio’s or fund’s recent peak value to a subsequent low point.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 14:328d ago
203 Billion Reasons Why Microsoft Is a Buy in 2026
Microsoft's OpenAI investment could infuse cash into its business at the right time.
Microsoft (MSFT +0.77%) has been a massive investment success over the past few years. Anybody who has bought Microsoft stock has been the beneficiary of several key trends in the tech industry, primarily cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI). However, Microsoft's AI strategy is a bit different than most of its peers. Instead of building its own generative AI model internally like Alphabet or Meta Platforms, it chose to partner with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT.
While this relationship got a bit messy at times, Microsoft has a significant financial interest in OpenAI's success. I think this could be a top reason to buy Microsoft stock in 2026, as it bolsters the rest of the investment case.
Image source: Getty Images.
Microsoft's stake in OpenAI is worth around $203 billion After a lot of negotiation in determining exactly how much of OpenAI Microsoft owns, the lawyers came to the conclusion that Microsoft owned about a 27% stake in OpenAI. That's a huge chunk, and it could be worth a ton based on OpenAI's latest valuation target. In December, OpenAI was targeting a $750 billion valuation to raise more money to operate the business. If that figure turns out to be accurate, then Microsoft's stake is worth around $203 billion.
That's a huge investment, so seeing OpenAI succeed is a huge point for Microsoft. As a result, it has integrated OpenAI's ChatGPT into its Copilot product lineup, which helps users integrate generative AI features across Office products, as well as other business software Microsoft produces. However, Microsoft isn't betting the house on ChatGPT.
In its Azure AI Factory, it offers multiple generative AI models outside of ChatGPT. Developers can select from alternative models like Grok from xAI, Meta's open language model Llama, Anthropic's Claude, and many others. This neutral strategy of offering many types of models so developers can choose which one fits their needs most has been a great strategy for Microsoft. It's one of the primary reasons why Microsoft's cloud computing division has dramatically outpaced Amazon's and Google's.
In the first quarter of Microsoft's fiscal 2026 (ended Sept. 30), Azure's revenue rose a jaw-dropping 40% year over year. For comparison, Google Cloud, a smaller entity that should be able to grow faster, was up 34% year over year. AWS also had a strong quarter compared to recent results, but its revenue only rose 20%.
Today's Change
(
0.77
%) $
3.50
Current Price
$
460.16
The difference? Amazon and Google are pushing their own solutions while Microsoft offers a wide variety. While this may be more profitable for Google and Amazon in the end, from a revenue growth standpoint, Azure is winning. Furthermore, ChatGPT is still seen as the go-to generative AI model, so Microsoft is seeing a dual benefit by being one of the primary hosts for ChatGPT and being invested in it. But does that translate into Microsoft's stock being a buy?
Microsoft's stock isn't the cheapest around Microsoft trades for about 29 times forward earnings, which is pretty standard for most big tech companies nowadays. With its valuation at the expected level, that means most of its stock performance will likely come from its business growth. For fiscal 2026 (ending June 30), Wall Street analysts expect 16% revenue growth. For fiscal 2027, they expect 15%.
That's a solid growth rate for a big tech company like Microsoft, and I would expect its stock price to rise a similar amount over that time frame. The long-term average performance of the S&P 500 is about 10% per year, so if Microsoft can maintain its valuation and achieve its expected growth rate, it will be a successful investment over the long term.
If OpenAI goes public, it will bolster its investment case even further because now Microsoft has a $203 billion investment that it can convert to cash fairly easily to use for activities like constructing data centers. That could be a huge advantage in the AI arms race, and Microsoft looks like a great stock to buy for 2026 as a result.
Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 14:358d ago
KXI vs. IYK: KXI Has More International Holdings, But IYK Has a Higher Dividend Yield
Explore how portfolio breadth, yield, and sector focus set these two consumer staples ETFs apart for globally minded investors.
The iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK 0.46%) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI 0.14%) both track the consumer staples sector, but KXI includes a broader mix of global holdings, while IYK focuses on U.S. companies, and the two differ on recent performance, yield, and diversification.
Both IYK and KXI target the consumer staples segment, appealing to investors seeking defensive sector exposure. IYK is built around U.S. staples giants, while KXI casts a wider net globally. This comparison highlights how each fund stacks up on cost, risk, and portfolio makeup for those weighing home market focus versus international breadth.
Snapshot (Cost & Size)MetricIYKKXIIssuerISharesISharesExpense ratio0.38%0.39%1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09)6.2%11.2%Dividend yield2.7%2.2%AUM$1.2 billion$908.7 millionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
Costs are nearly identical between the two, with KXI charging just 0.01 percentage points more in annual expenses. IYK’s yield is modestly higher, offering a larger payout for income-focused investors.
Performance & Risk ComparisonMetricIYKKXIMax drawdown (5 y)-15.04%-17.43%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,139$1,136What's InsideKXI holds 96 global equities in the consumer staples sector. Its top positions include Walmart Inc (WMT +0.42%), Costco Wholesale Corp (COST +0.78%), and Philip Morris International Inc (PM +0.61%). The portfolio skews 97% toward consumer defensive names, with a small tilt to consumer cyclicals, and has a fund history stretching more than 19 years.
IYK, by contrast, is concentrated on the U.S. market with 54 holdings. Its largest weights are Procter & Gamble (PG 0.07%), Coca-cola (KO 0.06%), and Philip Morris International Inc. The fund is heavily tilted toward consumer defensive stocks but also has exposure to healthcare and basic materials, reflecting a slightly broader sector mix within U.S. borders.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What This Means For InvestorsiShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) are two of the best-known consumer sector ETFs. Here are the key similarities and differences that investors should know.
To begin, let's examine the similarities. Both funds boast nearly identical expense ratios. IYK has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while KXI's expense ratio is 0.39%. Recent performance between the two funds is also very similar. Over the last five years, IYK has generated a total return of 29%, while KXI has generated a total return of 30%. Lastly, both funds are around the same size. KXI has approximately $900 million in AUM, while IYK has about $1.2 billion.
Turning to differences, fund holdings are one area that separates these funds. IYK holds only 54 stocks, led by iconic U.S. companies like Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble. KXI, on the other hand, holds 96 stocks, including some prominent international consumer stocks like Nestle and Unilever. As for income, IYK boasts the larger dividend yield of 2.7% versus 2.2% for KXI.
In sum, income-oriented investors may favor IYK thanks to its higher dividend yield, along with investors seeking exposure to the U.S. consumer market. Meanwhile, those with a desire for international exposure, or who have less of a need for income, may turn to KXI given its greater international holdings and lower dividend yield.
GlossaryETF: Exchange-traded fund, a basket of securities that trades on an exchange like a stock.
Consumer staples sector: Companies selling essential everyday products, such as food, beverages, and household goods.
Defensive sector: Industry group that tends to be less sensitive to economic cycles, often providing more stable returns.
Diversification: Spreading investments across many holdings to reduce the impact of any single position’s performance.
Expense ratio: Annual fund fee, expressed as a percentage of assets, covering management and operating costs.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends per share divided by the share price, showing income return percentage.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends and distributions, assuming reinvestment.
Beta: Measure of an investment’s volatility relative to the overall market, typically compared with the S&P 500.
Assets under management (AUM): Total market value of all assets that a fund or manager oversees.
Max drawdown: Largest peak-to-trough decline in value over a specific period, showing worst historical loss.
Consumer defensive: Another term for consumer staples; companies providing essential goods that people buy regardless of the economy.
Consumer cyclicals: Companies selling non-essential goods and services whose demand typically rises and falls with the economy.
2026 is shaping up to be a pivotal year for the electric vehicle startup.
Rivian (RIVN 2.26%) is gearing up to launch its next vehicle platform, and the stock price has surged by roughly 36% over the last year in anticipation. Still, the electric vehicle (EV) company's share price is down by roughly 90% from the all-time high it touched in late 2021 -- and big questions remain about the business's potential path to profitability.
Growth in the EV market has slowed substantially since the company held its initial public offering in 2021, and the rise of competition from Chinese manufacturers could seriously dampen Rivian's growth trajectory. Is Rivian stock yesterday's news, or could the EV maker carve out a durable position that translates into big returns for shareholders who buy now?
Image source: Rivian.
Is Rivian's valuation rebound sustainable? In the third quarter, Rivian's revenue grew by 78% year over year to roughly $1.56 billion. It also posted a gross profit of $24 million -- an improvement of $416 million compared to the prior-year period, when it booked a steep gross loss. Rivian has begun to post positive gross margins, which is admittedly a major positive development. On the other hand, those gross margins are still very low -- and it continues to post big net losses.
Its automotive gross profits still came in at negative $130 million. That shrunk its automotive gross loss by $249 million compared to last year's Q3, but its cost of goods sold continues to be higher than its revenue.
The company delivered 13,201 vehicles in the third quarter and announced at the beginning of this month that it had delivered 9,745 vehicles in Q4. The late-year drop-off meant that the company closed out 2025 with fewer deliveries than it posted in either 2023 or 2024, and on a quarterly basis, it has yet to surpass the peak of 15,564 units delivered in the third quarter of 2023.
Today's Change
(
-2.26
%) $
-0.39
Current Price
$
16.68
With the company on the verge of rolling out its R2 SUVs, Rivian will have opportunities to reenergize deliveries and significantly increase its customer base. The R2 models will be significantly cheaper than the company's R1 models. A surge in unit demand should help the company support the expansion of its manufacturing and provide it with some economies-of-scale benefits, but it could still be a while before Rivian is posting positive gross profits on its vehicles.
R2 SUVs are expected to hit the market in the first half of this year with a price of roughly $60,000 for the launch edition. A different R2 configuration with a base price of $45,000 is set to go into production later. Meanwhile, current R1 models have an average selling price of $86,500.
The more affordable R2 options could quickly come to make up a substantial portion of the company's overall sales mix. While the R2s have been designed with efficiencies to help support mass-market pricing, they could actually wind up pushing Rivian's gross margins and operating income margins lower for the foreseeable future.
With EV demand currently looking soft and a significant risk that the rollout of the R2 will lead to sustained margin headwinds that may eventually give way to potential improvements, I wouldn't bet on Rivian's stock comeback right now.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:038d ago
Prediction: This Will Be Alphabet's Stock Price by the End of 2026
The primary factors that were boosting Alphabet's stock price last year are gone.
Alphabet (GOOG 0.80%) (GOOGL 0.80%) was the top-performing "Magnificent Seven" stock of 2025, and also outpaced many other big tech stocks. It had multiple catalysts driving it higher, but some of those won't be applicable in 2026.
What will its stock price be by the end of 2026? Well, I don't think that Alphabet can pull off another 65% run like it did in 2025, but I do think that the stock will beat the market.
Image source: Getty Images.
Lingering issues were resolved Alphabet had a few problems as 2025 began. Many investors were convinced that it was too far behind in the generative AI race and wouldn't be able to catch up to the upstarts that had snagged market share in the early days. However, it proved that premise wrong throughout the year. Gemini emerged as a top large language model and has challenged the leaders in many of the tests used to determine how accurate and useful these models are. Alphabet enters 2026 as one of the leaders in the generative AI realm, and this could boost the company throughout the year as more and more clients choose to build their artificial intelligence features utilizing Gemini. We're still probably a few years out from seeing this investment pay off, but I think it will be a long-term positive.
Today's Change
(
-0.80
%) $
-2.68
Current Price
$
330.10
Another area investors were worried about was the status of Google Search, Alphabet's primary cash cow. In Q3, Google Search was responsible for $56.6 billion of the company's $102.3 billion in total revenues.
At the start of 2025, Google Search was facing two threats: generative AI, and the possibility that the company would have to divest itself of key units such as the Chrome browser and the Android operating system after a federal judge ruled that Alphabet had been violating antitrust laws and behaving as a monopoly. The search business benefits heavily from its integration with Chrome and Android.
The first concern was based on the assumption that generative AI tools would reduce the amount of traffic to Google Search pages as people used options like ChatGPT to answer their questions instead, but that hasn't happened. Instead, the company integrated AI Overviews into its search responses. Those AI-generated summaries have proven popular, and helped Google maintain its dominance in search.
Additionally, Alphabet received positive news from the court: The judge chose to impose lighter penalties on it for its anticompetitiveness violations. No breakup of the company was required. While it had to make some concessions, they were relatively minor, and considering the range of outcomes the company could have faced, matters couldn't have worked out any better.
All of these items contributed to the stock being undervalued early in 2025. However, as they were resolved, its valuation rose back to parity with its big tech peers. As a result, the biggest catalyst from 2025 is no longer applicable in 2026.
GOOG PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.
Now, it trades for 30 times forward earnings, which I'd say is a very reasonable price tag in today's environment for big tech. From here, we can expect its stock price moves to be somewhat correlated to its earnings growth.
With that in mind, what might Alphabet's stock price be at the end of 2026?
2026 won't be a repeat of 2025 Alphabet's revenue is expected to increase by about 14% in 2026. That rate is around the bar that all big tech companies have to clear to be attractive investments.
If we assume that it will still trade for 30 times forward earnings at the end of 2026, we'll need to utilize 2027 projections. For 2027, the average estimate among 10 Wall Street analysts covering the stock is that it will generate $12.76 in earnings per share. At 30 times forward earnings, that would give it a share price of about $383 -- about 14% above today's level.
Because that's above the market's average annual return of about 10%, I think Alphabet is an excellent stock to buy now, but if the market rises by more than 10% (as it did in 2025), Alphabet could still underperform despite what most would consider a successful year.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:048d ago
Standard Uranium advances Corvo project with first drilling in 40 years - ICYMI
Standard Uranium Ltd (TSX-V:STND, OTCQB:STTDF, FRA:9SU0) VP exploration Sean Hillacre talked with Proactive about the company's upcoming drill program at the Corvo Project in Saskatchewan’s Eastern Athabasca Basin.
Hillacre outlined plans for the inaugural drill campaign on the project, which will target shallow, basement-hosted high-grade uranium across a 3,000-metre program. The work will involve 8 to 10 drill holes, with a focus on both historical targets and new zones identified through modern geophysics and prospecting.
The Corvo Project is being explored in partnership with Aventis Energy, marking the first drilling activity on the site in over 40 years. The company recently completed a large-scale ground gravity survey, covering over 5,000 stations along 29km of conductive strike, aimed at refining drill targets further. Hillacre noted that infrastructure preparation is already underway.
The program aims to keep costs low with a winter skid approach, projecting expenses of about $1.5 million – considered highly efficient in today’s exploration environment.
Proactive: Welcome back inside our Proactive newsroom, and joining me now is Sean Hillacre. He is the Vice President of Exploration for Standard Uranium. Sean, nice to see you again. Happy New Year.
Sean Hillacre: Happy New Year. Doing great.
Good to hear. I know the company is out with news now about your Corvo Project, and it's one we've talked about in the past, but it really is an intriguing project. So why don't you remind everyone a bit about the project and how this is going to work moving forward?
Sounds good. Corvo is one of our Eastern Athabasca Basin projects in northern Saskatchewan. It sits right on the edge of the current Athabasca Basin margin, so we're targeting shallow, basement-hosted high-grade uranium. We're looking for deposits similar to Eagle Point and Rabbit Lake. We're partnered with Aventis Energy on this project, and we’ll be drilling it for the first time in about 40 years. We picked it up a couple of years ago, and have been doing geophysics to get our drill targets ready. This year, we’re heading up to look for some basement-hosted uranium.
Let's talk about the drill program — you've finalized the plan and you're going to tackle a few different areas, right?
Yes, that’s right. We did prospecting and mapping in 2025 and uncovered some great surface showings. This project is unique because there's rock outcrop at surface. At one historical showing, called Manhattan, we got results up to 8.1% uranium right at surface. It’s never been drilled before, so that'll be a priority target in the first drill program in 2026. We'll also follow up on mineralization from historical drill holes from 1978 and 1979.
Getting on there this time with modern exploration — I know we've talked about how important that is. Using drilling alongside those updated tools really takes it to another level?
Exactly. We’ve been upgrading the geophysics for the past year and a half. We flew new electromagnetic and magnetic surveys early in 2025 and did a gravity survey later in the year — just completed it recently. That was part of the news released yesterday. We covered more than 5,000 gravity stations along 29 km of conductor strike length. This will help refine our drill targets. We're excited to get those results back this week. We’re also ahead of schedule — we’re up there right now pushing in the access road, looking to mobilize at the end of the month.
Lastly, I want to ask you about the Manhattan showing. You mentioned it's never been drilled. Is it that earlier drilling didn’t know it was there, or has modern geophysics just uncovered things they couldn't see before?
Great question. The historical drilling in the late '70s wasn’t near the Manhattan showing. That area was discovered later. The historical holes are along two main northeast-southwest structural corridors, with most drilling along the southernmost conductor. Manhattan is on a different, parallel conductor in the northeast. Some of the older drill holes returned uranium over good thicknesses, so we’ll follow up on those as well as test these new, high-grade surface areas.
Quotes have been lightly for clarity and style
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:088d ago
Ignore FMC Stock: This Agricultural Innovator Is Reaping Rewards From AI and Automation
FMC isn't the agriculture play right now; it's Deere & Co., the company bringing AI and automation to the farm of tomorrow.
Spare a thought for the farmer. It's the millions of them across the world that allow our modern economy to exist. And there are fewer of them doing it today than ever. In the 1700s, roughly 80% of the American population was farmers. Today, they represent less than 2% of the population. Yet they feed a vastly larger population than their historical counterparts.
Modern technology allows farmers to produce enough food collectively to feed nearly all of the 8 billion people around the world. But the agricultural revolution is ongoing. And one of America's oldest companies is leading the way.
Image source: Getty Images.
Tomorrow's tractor, today's fields Deere & Company (DE 0.09%), better known colloquially as John Deere, turns 189 this year, and it's still as much a leader in agriculture as it was back when it was founded in 1837. If there's a machine you need on a farm, from a riding lawn mower to a tractor to a combine harvester, odds are good you can find one branded with the company's iconic prancing stag logo.
More recent additions to the company's offerings include a whole suite of digital tools, including equipment management software and satellite imaging. But the company isn't stopping with the digitization of farming, it's introducing artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous driving as well.
Today's Change
(
-0.09
%) $
-0.44
Current Price
$
514.60
First, let's talk about pesticides and weed control. In the past, farmers had to spray down entire fields with pesticides to kill weeds. It was expensive and put a lot of chemicals into the food supply and the environment. But Deere's new smart sprayers use 36 cameras and machine learning to identify individual weeds and automatically spray them individually.
The result for the 1 million acres this technology was tested on in 2023 was a 50% reduction in water and chemical use, an 87% reduction in the airborne drift of those chemicals, and a 93% reduction in chemical runoff. The farmer saves money on water and pesticides, and there are fewer chemicals in the environment. It's a win-win.
Deere already has an autonomous tractor in field testing, too.
With its 360-degree cameras and sophisticated software, the tractor can recognize and avoid obstacles while being monitored remotely by the farmer, who is freed up to do other important work around the farm.
In the words of Deanna Kovar, Deere's president of Worldwide Ag & Turf for Europe, Asia, and Africa, "All farmers need to do is transport their tractor to the field, get it set, get out of the cab, and use their mobile phone to 'swipe to farm.'"
Deere has always been a juggernaut in the agricultural industry, and on the financial front, it's performing well despite a poor 2025. Over the year, net sales and revenue were down 12%, and net income was down 29%. The decline in income is likely due to the cost of Deere's research and development operations, which have skyrocketed to $2.29 billion or 5.1% of sales over the past four years.
Despite that, the company maintains a net income margin of 11%. It also regularly increases its dividend, which is up by 113% since 2020.
And for Q4 2025, the company saw a considerable uptick in net sales and revenue of 11%, indicating it's picking up some steam going into 2026. And it is still investing heavily in its technological edge. It needs to.
There are slated to be 10 billion people on the planet by 2050, and Deere projects that a 60%-70% increase in agricultural production will be needed to feed them all. This company's machines have been a farmer's best friend for almost 200 years, and I predict they will continue to be.
But more efficient farming is bad news for companies like FMC (FMC 0.58%) that make the chemicals Deere's tractors will ensure farmers use less of.
The farmer's chemist is looking sickly FMC is also a straightforward business. It develops and produces pesticides, fungicides, and other farming chemicals used to protect crops. However, while Deere's latest results showed a potential increase in momentum, FMC's results were disastrous.
Today's Change
(
-0.58
%) $
-0.09
Current Price
$
15.39
For Q3 2025, the company reported a revenue decline of 49% from just over $1 billion to $542 million. Net income went from $66 million in Q3 2024 to a $569 million loss in Q3 2025. Finally, the company's earnings per share fell from $0.52 in Q3 2024 to a loss of $4.52 per share in Q3 2025.
The company's cash-flow guidance is especially grim. At the end of 2024, its free cash flow (FCF) was $614 million. For 2025, it's projecting a FCF loss of $100 million. And this is coming at a time when Deere is just testing out the smart sprayers that can cut pesticide use in half.
Things aren't looking great for FMC, and I don't foresee the company's lot improving anytime soon. I would skip it and look at Deere instead.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:208d ago
ROSEN, TOP RANKED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Bath & Body Works, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - BBWI
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - January 17, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Bath & Body Works, Inc. (NYSE: BBWI) securities between June 4, 2024 and November 19, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 16, 2026.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Bath & Body Works securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Bath & Body Works class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50622 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 16, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, and that defendants failed to disclose that: (1) Bath & Body Works' strategy of pursuing "adjacencies, collaborations and promotions" was not growing the customer base and/or delivering the level of growth in net sales touted; (2) as Bath & Body Works' strategy of "adjacencies, collaborations and promotions" faltered, it relied on brand collaborations "to carry quarters" and obfuscate otherwise weak underlying financial results; (3) as a result, Bath & Body Works was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Bath & Body Works' business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Body & Body Works class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50622 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/280677
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Contact Us
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:248d ago
Here's Why United Parcel Service Stock Is a Buy Before Jan. 27
The next quarterly earnings update could extend the positive trends taking shape.
United Parcel Service (UPS 1.61%) stock is deeply unloved on Wall Street. The share price is down 53% from its 2022 highs, and the dividend yield is a well-above-market 6.1%. Yet the stock has risen nearly 30% over the past three months. Here's a look at what is going on, and why you might want to buy the stock before it next reports earnings on Jan. 27.
What does UPS do? United Parcel Service, commonly referred to as UPS, is one of the largest package delivery companies in the United States. This seems like a fairly simple business in some ways, as you just have to pick up a box and then bring it to another location. However, package delivery is a complex logistical task that requires a huge infrastructure to be done successfully.
Image source: Getty Images.
The company's big brown box delivery trucks, pickup kiosks, and stores are the front-facing piece of the puzzle. Alone, those require huge capital investments to create and maintain. Behind them lies a vast network of distribution and sorting facilities, as well as transportation assets, including both trucks and airplanes. Managing it all is a complex computer system that tracks every individual package the company handles.
UPS' ability to deliver packages reliably and quickly is an achievement of a very high order. It would be extremely challenging to dislodge this industrial giant. In fact, even after years of building its own distribution system, e-commerce giant Amazon (AMZN +0.49%) still relies on UPS and is likely to continue doing so for years to come.
Things are changing at UPS Amazon is actually quite important to the UPS story. Amazon is a high-volume customer for UPS, but the business has low profit margins. That's why UPS has proactively decided to reduce the number of Amazon packages it handles. This is all part of UPS' larger overhaul, an effort that has included exiting low-margin businesses, focusing on higher-margin businesses, and streamlining and modernizing its infrastructure.
Wall Street is clearly concerned about what UPS is doing, given the significant decline in its stock price since 2022. That makes sense, since the turnaround effort has involved spending more money at the same time that it is leading to lower revenue. Quarterly earnings results have been tough reading for a while.
If you dig just a little deeper than the headline numbers, however, there are positive signs of progress. For example, in the second quarter of 2025, the revenue per package in the company's core U.S. market rose 5.5%. That's exactly what you would expect to see based on what UPS is doing.
Today's Change
(
-1.61
%) $
-1.75
Current Price
$
106.87
That result was followed up by a 9.8% increase in revenue per package in the third quarter of 2025. One quarter does not make a trend, but two quarters are very clearly the start of a trend. This is likely why UPS' stock price has been rising over the past three months.
It seems reasonable to expect that the fourth quarter will see another increase in the revenue per package. This would be a clear indication that UPS has navigated the worst of the turnaround effort and is starting to return to growth. If that's the case, further gains in stock prices seem highly likely.
Don't wait too long to buy UPS UPS may not be a good fit for risk-averse investors. The yield is high for reasons, including the fact that the trailing 12-month dividend payout ratio is over 100%. There's a very clear risk that a dividend cut will take place. However, if you're a turnaround investor, it appears that UPS' business has started to turn for the better. The next earnings report could be the confirmation that Wall Street is looking for to kick the price rally into a higher gear.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:308d ago
Eli Lilly, Nvidia team up in a $1B AI innovation lab.
Expense differences and fund scale may impact which gold ETF best fits your portfolio strategy.
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD 0.48%) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM 0.46%) both track the price of gold bullion, but GLDM’s notably lower expense ratio and smaller fund size set it apart from the long-established, much larger GLD.
Both SPDR Gold Shares and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust provide direct gold exposure for investors seeking to track the performance of the metal, minus fund expenses. This comparison looks at their differences in cost, scale, performance, and risk, to help clarify which may better fit a gold allocation.
Snapshot (Cost & Size)MetricGLDGLDMIssuerSPDRSPDRExpense ratio0.40%0.10%1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09)67.0%66.2%Beta0.090.09AUM$151.5 billion$26.4 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
GLDM stands out as the more affordable option, charging just 0.10% per year compared to GLD’s 0.40% expense ratio, which could appeal to cost-conscious investors. Yield is not a consideration here, as neither fund distributes dividends.
Performance & Risk ComparisonMetricGLDGLDMMax drawdown (5 y)-21.03%-20.92%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,396$2,427What's InsideSPDR Gold MiniShares Trust is designed for investors seeking a cost-effective, convenient way to invest in gold. The fund has been available for 7.5 years and is intended to track the price of gold bullion, despite being classified under the Real Estate sector in some listings. There are no reported quirks or special features, and top holdings information is not disclosed, but the portfolio structure closely mirrors gold’s price movements.
SPDR Gold Shares, the original gold ETF, also provides 100% exposure to basic materials, reflecting the price of physical gold. Top holdings are not detailed, but the fund’s large scale and deep liquidity make it a go-to choice for institutional investors or those trading in large volumes. Both funds avoid leverage, derivatives, or ESG overlays, keeping exposures pure and straightforward.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What This Means For InvestorsThere are some ETF comparisons that every investor should know about. I believe that to be the case when it comes to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Here's why.
To start with, it's important to note that precious metals -- and gold in particular -- are often considered a wise addition to most portfolios. Gold, for example, has long been viewed as a central hedge against inflation -- a process characterized by rising prices and a corresponding reduction in the value of money itself. Therefore, it makes sense to own some gold, and financial advisors typically recommend between 5% to 10% allocation to the yellow metal.
So, for investors considering gold, what's the best way to do it? Obviously, someone could purchase physical gold bullion and keep it in a safe place. But, short of that, most investors are happy to simple own gold via through their broker. In that case, ETFs are the way to go. They offer exposure to the price of physical gold, without the hassle of storage and safe keeping. What's more, gold ETFs are liquid, meaning investors can easily convert shares into cash and vice-versa.
Turning to GLD and GLDM, investors should know that these ETFs have virtually identical performance results, dating back over the last five years. GLDM has slightly outperformed GLD, with a total return of 145.8% versus 142.5 for GLD. On a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) basis, GLDM has posted a 19.7% CAGR versus a 19.4% CAGR for GLD. In short, GLDM is a slightly better choice, thanks in large part to its cheaper expense ratio (0.10% vs. 0.40% for GLD). Granted, GLD is the larger ETF, with over $151 billion in assets under management, meaning that investors with concerns over liquidity may still favor GLD. However, with more than $26 billion in AUM itself, GLDM has ample liquidity -- meaning that gold investors who are cost-conscious should strongly consider GLDM over GLD.
GlossaryETF: Exchange-traded fund that trades on stock exchanges and typically tracks an index or asset.
Expense ratio: Annual fund fee, expressed as a percentage of assets, deducted from returns to cover operating costs.
AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of all assets held by the fund.
Gold bullion: Physical gold in bars or ingots, valued primarily by weight and purity, not collectability.
Beta: Measure of an investment’s volatility relative to a benchmark index, often the S&P 500.
Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in an investment’s value over a specific period.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus any income, assuming all payouts are reinvested.
Liquidity: How easily and quickly an asset or fund can be bought or sold without moving its price.
Leverage: Using borrowed money or derivatives to increase exposure, which can amplify gains and losses.
Derivatives: Financial contracts whose value is based on an underlying asset, index, or rate, such as futures or options.
ESG overlays: Environmental, social, and governance screens or rules applied to include or exclude certain investments.
Tracking: How closely a fund’s performance matches the performance of its target index or underlying asset.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 15:538d ago
1 Top Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist Before the Nasdaq Soars Higher in 2026
This beaten-down tech stock could see a solid turnaround in its fortunes in the new year.
The stock market is off to a decent start in the new year. The S&P 500 index is up 1.5% in the first two weeks of 2026, and there is a good chance that the benchmark index will continue to head higher as the year progresses.
Goldman Sachs' analysts expect U.S. stocks to rise for the fourth straight year, driven by a resilient economy, robust artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure spending, and potential rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. The investment bank's strategists expect a 12% appreciation in the S&P 500 in 2026. Tech stocks are likely to play a central role once again in driving the stock market rally this year on the back of continued growth in AI spending.
The investment bank estimates that large hyperscalers increased their capital spending by 70% last year. The good part is that these hyperscalers are expected to bump up their capital spending at healthy double-digit rates in 2026. This probably explains why investors continue to remain bullish about the tech sector. The Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector index has already gained 3% in 2026, outperforming the S&P 500 so far.
It won't be surprising to see tech stocks deliver bigger gains than the S&P 500 for the rest of 2026, just like they have done in the past year. That's why it would be a good time to take a closer look at one such tech stock -- Arm Holdings (ARM +0.64%) -- that can capitalize on the broader market's rally and deliver handsome gains to investors.
Image source: Getty Images.
Arm Holdings' solid growth could help the stock regain its mojo Arm Holdings has been under pressure in recent months despite posting impressive growth in revenue and earnings. Shares of the British technology company fell substantially in December 2025, driven by concerns about its expensive valuation and its ability to capitalize on the AI semiconductor boom.
Today's Change
(
0.64
%) $
0.67
Current Price
$
105.78
It is worth noting that shares trade down 40% since hitting a 52-week high in late October 2025. However, a closer look at Arm's performance and prospects will make it clear that its pullback could be an opportunity for investors looking to add a growth stock to their portfolios.
Arm is known for designing and licensing chip architectures. It doesn't manufacture any chips of its own but designs the blueprints for processors that power several applications. The company gets its revenue from sales of licenses, as well as a royalty on the sale of each chip designed using its intellectual property (IP).
Arm's IP is used to design chips that power smartphones, cars, data centers, and other consumer electronics devices. In fact, almost all smartphone processors are designed using Arm's architecture. Additionally, the company has been gaining share in fast-growing areas such as networking and cloud computing.
Its share of the cloud computing market has increased by 11 percentage points in three years, sitting at 20% at the end of fiscal 2025 (which ended in March last year). Looking ahead, Arm could continue to gain more share in the lucrative data center market as major hyperscalers have been designing custom chips using the company's IP.
Moreover, the company's latest AI-focused architecture, Armv9, commands a higher royalty than the previous architecture. This explains why the company's royalty from the data center business doubled year over year in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 (which ended on Sept. 30, 2025). Its overall revenue jumped by an impressive 34% from the year-ago period, while earnings increased by 30%.
Arm's earnings are likely to grow at a healthy pace, and they may even outpace consensus expectations.
Data by YCharts.
Analysts expect solid upside from the stock in the coming year Even though Arm stock has pulled back significantly in recent months, it trades at an expensive 138 times trailing earnings. However, the forward earnings multiple of 47 is way more reasonable, and points toward a significant acceleration that's expected in the company's bottom line.
Given that Arm's earnings growth is likely to accelerate as the Armv9 architecture contributes more toward its royalty revenue, the stock's forward earnings multiple seems justifiable. Additionally, analysts are upbeat about Arm stock's trajectory in the coming year. Its median price target of $180, as per 41 analysts covering the stock, points toward potential gains of 67% from current levels.
Arm could indeed deliver such gains by virtue of its ability to outpace Wall Street's growth expectations, making it a top growth stock to buy right now before it steps on the gas.
You can't talk about the AI revolution without discussing the surging demand for power it has created. In particular, nuclear energy has come back into focus. There's a two-part reason why now is a great time to buy stock in power generation company Vistra (VST 7.54%), and it has to do with two tech giants.
Today's Change
(
-7.54
%) $
-13.58
Current Price
$
166.60
Tech companies love nuclear Last week, Vistra announced that Meta Platforms (META 0.04%) had entered a 20-year power purchase agreement involving three Vistra-owned nuclear plants. This isn't just lip service from Meta leader Mark Zuckerberg; this is a real investment that'll have a positive ripple effect for energy investors.
Image source: Getty Images.
More than a year ago, Nvidia (NVDA 0.29%) CEO Jensen Huang made comments about how nuclear would be necessary and a "wonderful way forward." The energy demand is so immense that Huang also discussed how all forms of energy will be needed. This is even better news for Vistra investors, as the company owns and operates nuclear, natural gas, coal, and solar generation facilities as well as battery energy storage facilities.
Vistra's ability to rise to the occasion through dispatchable generation -- which can be ramped up and down quickly to meet real-time needs -- means the company is capable of serving the needs of data centers. Electricity demand is heating up quickly. It's expected that 12% of U.S. electricity consumption will be from data centers by 2028. That's a threefold increase from just 2023.
Vistra's future looks bright Vistra's stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio just shy of 18 and an enterprise value-to-EBITDA ratio of 15. Not only do I believe Vistra is fairly priced right now, but I would anticipate strong growth from Vistra in the next few years. The company revised guidance upward in its early November earnings report. As a bonus, Vistra has also rewarded shareholders with quarterly dividends since 2019, though it yields under 1% right now. For investors wanting to find a way to get on the energy wave through a proven entity, Vistra is worth a look.
Catie Hogan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Silver, gold, copper, and other metals hit all-time highs throughout the week. David McAlvany has a price target of $8,000 an ounce in gold for the next three years.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 16:158d ago
Should You Buy Lucid Stock While It's at $10 a Share?
Lucid's stock price continues to decline, even after the company gave the stock more room to fall.
Lucid Group (LCID +0.70%) has made massive capital investments into its business over the past several years. The result is an award-winning high-end vehicle lineup with industry-leading battery technology. What is still lacking is scale. Here's why only the most aggressive investors should consider buying Lucid stock while it trades below $11 a share.
What does Lucid do? Lucid is an auto manufacturer. More specifically, it makes high-end electric vehicles (EVs). Right now, however, that distinction isn't the most important one. The key is that building and selling cars of any kind requires massive supporting infrastructure.
Image source: Getty Images.
Lucid is still in start-up mode, building out the manufacturing and sales platform it needs to compete with already established industry giants. The capital investment requirements are substantial, with the company openly telling investors in the third quarter of 2025 that it only had enough cash to fund its business through the first half of 2027. That was pitched as a positive, but for all but the most aggressive investors, it should probably be a warning sign.
The glass-half-empty view is that Lucid is a money-losing business, with only six quarters of cash remaining on its balance sheet. What happens if it can't find new investors to provide it with the capital it needs to keep building its business? The answer is not a positive one, which is likely why the stock has been in a steady downward trajectory for several years.
Today's Change
(
0.70
%) $
0.07
Current Price
$
10.12
The stock price isn't what it seems Lucid's stock price currently sits just a touch above $10 per share. However, investors need to take that price with a grain of salt. That's because in late August 2025, Lucid enacted a 1-for-10 reverse stock split. A reverse split doesn't change the percentage of a company a shareholder owns, but it does have the effect of increasing the stock price.
Normally, companies enact reverse stock splits because their stock price has fallen so low that they are at risk of being delisted from a stock exchange. If you do the math here, Lucid would be below $1 per share if it hadn't made the reverse stock split. That's the level at which stocks typically risk being delisted.
Being delisted makes it significantly more challenging for a company to access the capital markets for new cash. However, a low stock price is also a headwind, which helps explain the company's preemptive decision to do a reverse stock split.
Data by YCharts.
There's just one small problem: The business remains the same, and investors are concerned about Lucid's ability to generate a sustainable profit. The stock has dropped another 49% since the stock split took place on Aug. 29 last year. Wall Street is very clearly saying it thinks Lucid's future is murky at best.
One significant problem is that competition in the EV space is intense today, with every major automaker competing in the product niche, in addition to a few successful pure-play EV makers. Lucid is making important business progress, but the 18,378 vehicles it produced in the fourth quarter of 2025, despite being up 104% year over year, is still just a drop in the bucket compared to its larger peers. The company is nowhere close to being a major competitor in an industry where scale is vitally important.
Most investors should avoid Lucid It is normally a bad sign when a company effects a reverse stock split. Given the ongoing losses, limited capital, and modest size of Lucid's business, most investors should probably view its reverse stock split and subsequent stock price declines as a warning. Only the most aggressive investors should consider owning Lucid, and even then, a great deal of caution should be exercised.
Nvidia, Amazon, and Dutch Bros are top growth stocks to invest in now.
If you've got $1,000 available to start investing that isn't needed for monthly bills, to pay down short-term debt, or to bolster an emergency fund, buying some solid growth stocks across sectors can be a good place to start building a portfolio.
Let's look at three growth stocks to buy right now.
Image source: Getty Images.
1. Nvidia If you're looking for a way to play the artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure boom, Nvidia (NVDA 0.29%) is still a great choice. The company's graphics processing units (GPUs) are the main chips used to power AI workloads, and through its networking portfolio, it now offers customers end-to-end solutions for their AI data center needs.
While Nvidia is beginning to see more competition from AI ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits), its GPUs still hold distinct advantages. ASICs are custom chips that are hardwired for specific tasks and are less adaptable to a rapidly evolving tech landscape. ASICs also tend to require longer development cycles and often necessitate significant code redesigns from one generation to the next.
Today's Change
(
-0.29
%) $
-0.54
Current Price
$
186.51
Nvidia's CUDA software platform, on the other hand, has years of AI libraries and tools built on top of it to optimize the performance of its chips, especially for training large language models (LLMs). Meanwhile, its proprietary NVLink interconnect system can help its chips function as a single, powerful unit, further enhancing their performance.
While Nvidia ultimately won't be able to maintain its absolutely massive market share forever, it will still get more than its fair share of the AI infrastructure spending pie, making it a top growth stock to invest in.
2. Amazon Amazon (AMZN +0.49%) is a great combination of consumer goods and tech growth stock rolled into one. The company is seeing solid retail revenue growth, but more importantly, its investments in AI and robotics have led to strong operating leverage, with e-commerce profitability surges. This could be seen last quarter, when its North American segment's operating income jumped 28% year over year on an 11% increase in revenue.
Today's Change
(
0.49
%) $
1.18
Current Price
$
239.36
On top of that, the company sees revenue growth in its cloud computing unit, Amazon Web Services (AWS), beginning to accelerate. Demand for data center computing power and AI services is soaring, and Amazon is spending aggressively to meet growing demand. It's still ramping up its huge Project Rainier data center, which it built for Anthropic using its own custom AI chips, and it recently agreed to a seven-year, $38 billion deal with OpenAI to supply it with compute power using Nvidia GPUs.
Between accelerating cloud revenue growth and strong e-commerce operating leverage, Amazon is well-positioned for 2026 and beyond, making it a top stock to buy today.
3. Dutch Bros One of the top growth stocks in the consumer space is Dutch Bros (BROS +1.65%). The coffee shop operator offers a strong combination of same-store sales drivers and expansion opportunities that make it one of the most attractive growth stories in the market today.
The company is seeing robust comparable-store growth, led by the introduction of mobile ordering, increased brand awareness marketing, and new drink introductions. Meanwhile, the company has a big opportunity in front of it, as it rolls out hot food items to approximately 75% of its locations that can support this initiative. In early tests, pilot stores saw a 4% lift in sales from these hot items. Given that rival Starbucks gets around 20% of its sales from food, this is a large opportunity.
Today's Change
(
1.65
%) $
1.01
Current Price
$
62.15
At the same time, Dutch Bros has a huge expansion runway still in front of it. At the end of last quarter, it had fewer than 1,100 locations, with a goal of reaching 2,029 stores by 2029. Longer term, it thinks it can support as many as 7,000 locations in the U.S.
Its shops tend to be small, with no indoor seating and primarily served through drive-thru windows, giving it quick payback times on its investment spending. Importantly, this allows its new store expansion to be fully funded through its free cash flow, lessening the risk of this powerful growth story.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 16:308d ago
SCHG vs. VUG: Here's How to Decide on the Right Growth ETF for Your Portfolio
Explore how portfolio breadth and sector exposure set these two low-cost growth ETFs apart for investors seeking diversification.
The Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG 0.10%) and the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG 0.25%) both aim to provide exposure to the growth segment of large-cap U.S. stocks, tracking slightly different indexes with heavy technology tilts.
This analysis compares the two on cost, performance, risk, and portfolio makeup to help investors decide which may better fit their needs.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricVUGSCHGIssuerVanguardSchwabExpense ratio0.04%0.04%1-yr return (as of Jan. 15, 2026)20.19%17.88%Dividend yield0.41%0.36%AUM$352 billion$53 billionBeta (5Y monthly)1.211.17Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
Both ETFs are equally affordable on fees, charging a 0.04% expense ratio. With nearly identical dividend yields as well, neither stands out in terms of cost or payout.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricVUGSCHGMax drawdown (5 y)-35.61%-34.59%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,929$2,036What's insideSCHG holds 198 companies, offering exposure to U.S. large-cap growth. Its portfolio is comprised of 45% technology stocks, 16% communication services, and 13% consumer cyclical, with top positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft.
VUG, by contrast, holds 160 stocks with an even heavier tilt toward technology at 51%, followed by communication services and consumer cyclical. Its largest holdings mirror SCHG, but each stock makes up a slightly larger portion of the portfolio. Neither fund introduces leverage, currency hedging, or ESG screens.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsSCHG and VUG both capture the large-cap growth segment of the market, but they differ in their scope and diversification.
VUG is slightly narrower in focus, with fewer holdings and a stronger tilt toward tech stocks. The two funds share the same top three stocks, but they make up 32% of VUG's portfolio compared to 29% for SCHG. While it's a subtle difference, it can result in slightly different returns if those top holdings over- or underperform going forward.
VUG's heavier tech allocation can also lead to greater volatility. It's experienced marginally steeper drawdowns over the last five years, and its slightly higher beta also suggests more significant price fluctuations.
The two funds offer the same expense ratio and close to the same dividend yield, so investors won't notice much of a difference in fees and payout. The primary difference between them, then, is their slightly different risk profiles.
Investors looking for increased exposure to tech may prefer VUG's narrower portfolio, while those seeking greater diversification and marginally more stability may opt for SCHG.
GlossaryETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): A fund holding a basket of securities, traded on an exchange like a stock.
Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock divided by its current share price.
Growth fund: A fund focusing on companies expected to grow earnings faster than the overall market.
Large-cap: Refers to companies with large market values, typically tens or hundreds of billions of dollars.
Index: A rules-based list of securities used to track or measure a segment of the market.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends and distributions, assuming reinvestment.
1-year return: Total return generated by an investment over the most recent 12-month period.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared with the overall market, often the S&P 500.
Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in an investment’s value over a specified period.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of all assets managed within a fund.
Sector weight: The percentage of a fund’s assets invested in a particular industry or sector.
Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Vanguard Index Funds - Vanguard Growth ETF. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 16:458d ago
3 Magnificent Vanguard ETFs to Stock Up On Right Now if a Recession Is Coming in 2026
The right ETF can help protect your portfolio regardless of what happens with the market.
Stock prices continue to soar as we head into 2026, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average hitting new all-time highs earlier this week.
However, many investors are still on edge about what may be coming, with 80% of Americans at least somewhat concerned about a looming recession, according to a December 2025 survey from financial association MDRT.
It's wise to continue investing, even if a market downturn is on the horizon. Stocks could still have further to climb, and by continuing to buy consistently, you can capitalize on those returns. That said, investing in strong, stable exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can also help protect your portfolio if stocks tumble. And there are three powerful Vanguard funds that could be especially smart buys right now.
1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO 0.08%) is one of the largest and most popular ETFs out there. It tracks the S&P 500, containing just over 500 large-cap stocks from the nation's largest and strongest companies.
The S&P 500 itself has a decades-long track record of weathering even the most severe recessions, crashes, and bear markets. Not only has it survived these pullbacks, but it's gone on to earn positive total returns over time.
Today's Change
(
-0.08
%) $
-0.53
Current Price
$
636.09
If you're concerned about market volatility, an S&P 500 ETF can be a fantastic addition to your portfolio. With a long-term outlook, you're incredibly likely to see positive gains. In fact, over the last 82 years, every single one of the S&P 500's 10-year periods has ended in positive total returns, according to analysis from investment firm Capital Group.
While there are never any guarantees in the stock market, investing in an S&P 500 ETF and holding it for at least a decade can significantly limit the impact of volatility.
2. Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF One potential downside of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is its growing tilt toward the tech industry. Tech stocks are growing at staggering rates, and because the S&P 500 only includes large companies, an increasing number of stocks within the index are from the tech sector.
That's not necessarily a bad thing, especially considering that large companies, in general, are more likely to pull through periods of market turbulence. But if you're looking to limit your exposure to tech giants, the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI 0.06%) could be a smart alternative.
Today's Change
(
-0.06
%) $
-0.20
Current Price
$
341.85
This ETF aims to cover the entire U.S. equity market, with a whopping 3,527 stocks across all market segments. From small-cap to mega-cap and everything in between, this fund covers stocks of all sizes from all industries.
Increased diversification can further limit risk, especially when the market is shaky, and this ETF is about as diversified as you can get.
3. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF Dividend stocks pay a portion of their profits back to shareholders in the form of a dividend, and a dividend ETF is a collection of those stocks bundled together into a single investment.
The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG +0.22%) focuses on companies with a history of increasing their dividend payouts year after year. For investors concerned about a market downturn taking a toll on their portfolios, a dividend ETF can help generate passive income in addition to any investment returns.
Today's Change
(
0.22
%) $
0.50
Current Price
$
225.64
This fund pays quarterly dividends, and its most recent payout was around $0.88 per share. That may not sound like much, but if you're investing consistently and accumulating shares over time, you can build a passive income source worth thousands of dollars per year.
Reinvesting those dividends can also help grow your passive income stream faster. The more you reinvest, the more shares you'll own, and the more you'll earn in dividends. Over time, that can create a snowball effect, exponentially increasing your dividend income.
No matter what lies ahead for the market, continuing to invest consistently can help build long-term wealth. By investing in quality ETFs with a track record of surviving volatility, you can rest easier knowing your portfolio is as protected as possible.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 16:568d ago
VXUS Delivers International Exposure at a Lower Cost Than ACWX
Expense ratios, sector tilts, and portfolio breadth set these two international ETFs apart for globally minded investors.
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS +0.05%) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF (ACWX 0.06%) both offer broad non-U.S. equity exposure, but VXUS is significantly cheaper, holds far more stocks, and tilts less toward financials and technology than ACWX.
Both funds aim to deliver diversified access to international equities, targeting developed and emerging markets outside the United States. This comparison explores how their costs, holdings, sector tilts, and recent performance may matter for investors seeking global diversification.
Snapshot (Cost & Size)MetricVXUSACWXIssuerVanguardISharesExpense ratio0.05%0.32%1-yr return (as of 2026-01-09)33.7%34.2%Dividend yield3.1%2.7%Beta0.790.79AUM$124.7 billion$8.4 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
VXUS is considerably more affordable with an expense ratio of 0.05%, while ACWX charges 0.32%. VXUS also provides a higher dividend yield at 3.1% compared to ACWX’s 2.7% payout.
Performance & Risk ComparisonMetricVXUSACWXMax drawdown (5 y)-29.43%-30.06%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,256$1,267What's InsideACWX tracks large- and mid-cap companies outside the U.S. and currently holds 1,751 stocks. ACWX has a fund age of 17.8 years. It is most heavily weighted toward financial services (25%), technology (15%), and industrials (15%). Its top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Tencent Holdings Ltd, and Asml Holding Nv, collectively making up a notable share of assets.
VXUS, by contrast, is broader, holding 8,602 stocks across developed and emerging markets, and currently leans heavily into cash and others (53%), with smaller slices in industrials and technology. Its largest positions—Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Tencent Holdings Ltd, and ASML Holding NV—mirror ACWX’s, but make up a smaller portion of the portfolio, resulting in less concentration risk. Neither fund employs leverage, hedging, or ESG screens.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What This Means For InvestorsThe U.S. stock market is the largest and most influential around. However, investors would do well to remember that it is not all the world has to offer. There are many dynamic foreign-based companies listed on stock markets outside of the U.S. worth considering. For those who are looking to gain international exposure, there are plenty of ETFs to choose from, including Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF (ACWX). Here's what investors should know about them.
First, let's cover the funds' similarities. Both VXUS and ACWX overlap in terms of top holdings, including ASML, Tencent, and TSM. In addition, both share a similar performance history. Over the last five years, VXUS has generated a total return of 48.3%, while ACWX has generated a total return of 46.4%. Similarly, the max drawdown for each fund is nearly identical at approximately -30%. Finally, both funds have a beta of 0.79 -- indicating they are somewhat less volatile compared to the S&P 500.
Turning to differences, VXUS comes out ahead on several key factors. For one, its expense ratio is 0.05%, which is very attractive. ACWX, by contrast, has an expense ratio of 0.32%, which is far closer to the industry average. As for yield, VXUS is once again superior, with a dividend yield of 3.1%, which bests ACWX's 2.7% dividend yield.
In sum, VXUS appears to be a cut above ACWX at this point. Its lower fees and higher dividend yield along with nearly identical performance, mean VXUS appears to be the preferable choice for investors seeking international exposure.
GlossaryETF: Exchange-traded fund that holds a basket of securities and trades on an exchange like a stock.
Expense ratio: Annual fund operating costs expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average assets.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund divided by its current share price, shown as a percentage.
Beta: Measure of a fund’s volatility compared with a benchmark index, usually the S&P 500.
AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of all assets held in the fund.
Max drawdown: The largest peak-to-trough decline in a fund’s value over a specific period.
Total return: Investment performance including price changes plus all dividends and distributions, assuming reinvestment.
Sector allocation: How a fund’s holdings are distributed across different industries, such as technology or financials.
Emerging markets: Economies in the process of rapid growth and industrialization, generally riskier than developed markets.
Developed markets: Economies with mature financial systems, higher incomes, and stable regulatory environments.
Concentration risk: Risk that poor performance of a few large holdings significantly hurts the fund’s overall returns.
Hedging: Using financial strategies to reduce or offset potential losses from market movements.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 17:058d ago
The Best High-Yield Stocks to Buy With $500 Right Now
Don't get lured in by an outsized yield that won't last; focus on companies that are reliable dividend payers.
I'm a dividend investor, and I know what it feels like to explore stocks offering a double-digit yield. You want to believe it is a diamond in the rough that will pay you 10%-plus dividends forever. Those situations do occur, but not very often. Whether you have $500 or $5,000 to invest in dividend stocks right now, you need to make sure you focus on reliable dividend payers.
Image source: Getty Images.
REITs: A great sector to examine for income Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are designed to pass income on to investors in a tax-efficient manner. They avoid corporate-level taxation if they pay out at least 90% of their taxable income as dividends. The offset is that shareholders have to report the dividends as if they were earned income (taxes can be completely avoided by owning a REIT in a Roth IRA). Generally speaking, REITs pay attractive dividends and have relatively large dividend yields.
If you are trying to live off the income your portfolio generates, REITs should be in the mix. However, just like non-REITs, you have to be careful about which companies you buy. Some REITs have impressive dividend histories, while others have volatile dividend histories. Some REIT business models, by design, pay variable dividends.
The king of the REIT dividend stocks If dividend consistency is your top priority, there is one REIT that stands above all others: Federal Realty (FRT +1.84%). It has increased its dividend annually for 58 consecutive years, which makes it a Dividend King. That is the longest dividend streak in the REIT sector, and Federal Realty is the only REIT to have achieved Dividend King status.
Federal Realty achieved this goal by focusing on quality over quantity. It owns roughly 100 strip malls and mixed-use assets. They tend to be located near large population centers that have high concentrations of wealth. Furthermore, Federal Realty is an active portfolio manager, continually making capital investments to enhance the value of its properties. It is also willing to sell assets that have reached their full potential, so it can buy new properties that need a little love.
Today's Change
(
1.84
%) $
1.87
Current Price
$
103.67
Federal Realty's dividend yield is 4.4% today. That is roughly 4 times higher than the 1.1% yield of the S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.06%) index and above the 3.9% REIT average. For most dividend investors, Federal Realty will be a solid portfolio holding, with $500 netting you around four shares of this reliable dividend stock.
Be careful what you reach for For some investors, however, 4.4% will feel like a low number when you can buy a REIT like AGNC Investment (AGNC +2.14%) with a 12.5% yield. That yield is highly attractive, and the mortgage REIT is well respected. However, it is not a reliable dividend payer. The graph below highlights the problem.
Data by YCharts.
If you need to use the dividends you collect to supplement your Social Security checks, you would have been sorely disappointed with AGNC Investment. Not only has the dividend been volatile, but it has also trended steadily lower for over a decade. And the stock price has followed the dividend lower. Less income and less capital are not what most dividend investors have in mind when they buy a high-yield stock. I know for a fact that this isn't my goal.
Focus on reliable dividend stocks Federal Realty is the cream of the crop when it comes to dividend-paying REITs. But it is hardly the only reliable dividend payer in the REIT sector. For example, Realty Income (O +1.14%) has increased its dividend annually for 30 years and has a 5.4% yield.
Today's Change
(
1.14
%) $
0.69
Current Price
$
61.41
The company owns single-tenant properties using a net lease approach, which means the tenant is responsible for most property-level costs. Realty Income is the industry giant, with a portfolio of more than 15,500 properties spread across the United States and Europe. Although it is primarily concentrated in retail assets, the company also owns industrial properties and a diverse collection of unique assets, including data centers and casinos.
Moreover, it is branching out into lending and asset management for institutional investors, as well. A $500 investment will allow you to buy eight shares of this monthly paid dividend stock.
Buy these two REITs or keep digging Federal Realty and Realty Income are foundational investments for dividend lovers. However, they aren't the only reliable dividend stocks you'll find in the REIT sector. They are just two very good examples of what you can find if you dig into the sector.
AGNC Investment, meanwhile, is an example of the type of dividend-paying REIT that you need to be wary of. The company meets its goal of producing attractive total returns, but that goal assumes dividend reinvestment. That means you can't use the dividend, which is highly volatile, to pay for living expenses.
Make sure you put all the pieces of the puzzle together before you buy a dividend stock. Dividend yield alone isn't enough information for you to make a final investment decision.
Whether Meta stock is a buy or not depends on this one thing.
2025 was the year Meta Platforms (META 0.04%) made its intentions clear. The company spent aggressively on artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, doubled down on open-source models through Llama, and reshaped its organization to prioritize speed and execution. Investors largely accepted the strategy, even as margins came under pressure.
Going into 2026, the question is no longer whether Meta is serious about AI. The real question now is whether Meta can convert ambition into results.
Image source: Getty Images.
What the market already knows Much of Meta's AI narrative is well known. Investors understand that the company has committed tens of billions of dollars to compute and data centers. They know Meta is taking a different path from competitors by pushing Llama as an open-source foundation rather than a closed, monetized product. They've also seen management reorganize AI teams under Superintelligence Labs to speed up execution.
None of this is controversial.
What remains uncertain is whether these moves translate into durable economic gains or merely higher costs with more extended payback periods. That uncertainty is what makes 2026 an important year for the company.
The bull case: Reasons to own the stock The bullish argument for Meta going into 2026 rests on execution, not hype.
First, AI has the potential to materially improve Meta's core advertising business. Better targeting, smarter ranking, and more effective creative tools not only boost engagement but also improve return on ad spend. If Meta's AI systems continue to make ads more efficient, revenue growth can accelerate without a proportional increase in ad load. Arguably, the use of AI has already contributed toward Meta's solid 26% growth in revenue in the first nine months of 2025.
Second, Llama gives Meta a strategic advantage that doesn't show up neatly on income statements. By positioning Llama as open infrastructure, Meta pulls developers and enterprises into its ecosystem while pushing deployment costs outward. If Llama becomes a default layer for AI development, Meta benefits indirectly through better products, faster innovation, and ecosystem gravity.
Third, Meta's scale remains unmatched. With billions of users across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, the company can deploy AI features, gather feedback, and iterate faster than almost any competitor. If Meta's restructured AI organization delivers on speed, that feedback loop becomes a powerful compounding advantage.
If these pieces come together, Meta's long-term earnings power could improve further from here.
The risk case: What could go wrong While there are potential upsides, the downside risks aren't remote either. Meta doesn't need to fail for the stock to disappoint. It only needs to execute slower than investors expect.
The most obvious risk is that AI spending stays elevated longer than anticipated. Building and running large-scale models is expensive, and the payoff may arrive later than the market hopes. If margins remain under pressure without clear signs of operating leverage, sentiment could sour quickly.
There's also risk in Meta's open-source strategy. Llama's success depends on sustained developer adoption. If closed models continue to outperform open ones in terms of convenience or performance, developers may drift back toward proprietary ecosystems, thereby weakening Meta's influence. To this end, some of the leading AI models are from closed models, such as ChatGPT, Grok, and Anthropic.
Finally, regulatory and macro risks haven't disappeared. Advertising budgets remain cyclical, and regulatory scrutiny around AI and data usage could introduce new constraints.
The real question for 2026 Whether Meta is a buy going into 2026 comes down to a single issue: Can Meta turn AI essentially from a cost center into a profit amplifier?
Investors should watch for specific signals:
Evidence that AI-driven ad improvements are lifting monetization efficiency. Faster rollout of AI features across Meta's apps. Signs of operating leverage reemerging, even as AI investment continues. Stability within Meta's AI organization, with fewer restructurings and a more precise execution rhythm. These indicators matter far more than flashy model releases or benchmark scores.
Today's Change
(
-0.04
%) $
-0.26
Current Price
$
620.54
Meta stock going into 2026 isn't a bet on AI hype. It's a bet on execution.
For long-term investors comfortable with near-term volatility, Meta can make sense as a conditional buy, provided they believe the company can convert its scale, infrastructure, and ecosystem into tangible returns over the next few years.
For others who need clearer margin expansion or faster payback, it could be better to wait on the sidelines for clearer signs.
Either way, it's a stock to follow closely in 2026.
2026-01-17 23:288d ago
2026-01-17 17:458d ago
Why Ford Investors Might Have to Say Goodbye to Its Special Dividend
Investors can bank on Ford's traditional dividend for income, but its highly valuable supplemental dividend could be at risk in the near term.
Dividend stocks are a great tool for investors to build long-term wealth in the market. Reinvesting these dividends uses the power of compounding to help generate even more wealth over time. Ford Motor Company's (F 1.52%) dividend is lauded for its yield that currently tops 4%, as well as the company's consistent supplemental dividends it often dishes out as a bonus payment to investors.
Let's take a look at a recent example of why these supplemental dividends are powerful and why they could be in danger in the near term.
Remember Rivian? A great example of how lucrative these supplemental dividend payments can be happened in 2023. Originally, Ford had invested in young start-up electric vehicle maker Rivian, with plans for the two to collaborate on a shared platform.
Image source: Ford Motor Company.
Later on, the plans were eventually scrapped, and each automaker went its own way. When Ford sold its investment stake in Rivian, it drove a significant boost in the company's cash flow, which it distributed through its dividend. Remember that Ford aims to return 40% to 50% of its free cash flow to investors via the dividend. That scenario led to Ford dishing out a significant $0.65 per share special dividend in 2023, on top of its regular quarterly dividend payment of $0.15 per share.
In more recent years, Ford's annual supplemental dividend has been roughly one extra quarterly payment, give or take a few pennies. It's a nice boost on top of an already highly valuable dividend yield. Unfortunately, due to some unforeseen circumstances, Ford's supplemental dividend could be on the chopping block this year.
Today's Change
(
-1.52
%) $
-0.21
Current Price
$
13.60
What's going on? Ford is dealing with a couple of outside factors weighing on its financials. In fact, Ford previously noted that while its underlying business was performing at the high end of previous guidance, it was incurring a $1 billion net tariff headwind as well as an additional $1 billion headwind between 2025 and 2026 from the Novelis supplier fire.
Ultimately, while Ford has dished out a supplemental dividend three years running, the company's slowing cash flows will likely end that streak. In fact, Ford recently announced a massive pivot away from EVs that will cost the company a $19.5 billion charge with $5.5 billion in cash incurred over the next two years.
Dividend stocks historically outperform non-dividend-paying stocks, and income investors can still find immense value in Ford's traditional 4.2% dividend yield, but don't count on supplemental dividends in the near term.
Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.