Market Signal Briefing

Several smaller-cap tokens posted starkly different price-and-volume patterns over the past week, underscoring how quickly liquidity can rotate in a risk-on market. Ontology (ONT) and DaoMaker (DAO) stood out for what traders often regard as a more credible rally—price gains reinforced by sharp increases in trading activity—while GIZA showed signs of capitulation-like selling as volume rose into a steep drawdown.

The snapshot comes from a cross-analysis of seven-day performance and volume changes, a common way to distinguish a move driven by fresh demand from one sustained mainly by thin order books. In market terms, a price rise alongside rising volume is typically read as confirmation of 'real buying', whereas rising prices on falling volume can hint at 'buyer fatigue'. Conversely, falling prices paired with higher volume often signal escalating 'forced selling' or stop-loss activity, while declines in both price and volume tend to reflect waning attention and a cooling market.

'Real buying' signals: price up, volume up

Ontology (ONT) surged 52.66% on the week as trading volume jumped 3,463.94%, a combination that suggests the move was supported by broad participation rather than a brief technical bounce. DaoMaker (DAO) rose 28.75% with volume up 1,151.69%, also pointing to renewed spot demand. Huma Finance (HUMA) posted a more modest 11.06% increase, accompanied by a 49.37% rise in volume, indicating steadier accumulation rather than a sudden spike.

'Buyer fatigue' signals: price up, volume down

A second group advanced in price despite shrinking volume, a pattern that can emerge when early buyers push prices higher but follow-through demand fades. Magma (MAGMA) gained 27% while volume slipped 7%. Phala (PHA) climbed 18% with volume down 32%, and Akash Network (AKT) rose 12% as volume dropped 47%. In such setups, prices can remain elevated briefly, but the lack of reinforcing liquidity increases the odds of a near-term local top forming if incremental buyers hesitate.

'Capitulation pressure' signals: price down, volume up

GIZA posted the most dramatic dislocation, falling 52% even as volume increased 5%, a configuration often associated with accelerated liquidation and stop-loss selling. Berachain (BERA) declined 23% with volume up 1%, and Somnia (SOMI) fell 12% as volume rose 12%. When volume expands into a sell-off, it can indicate that sellers are becoming more urgent—raising the probability of additional volatility until the market finds a clearing price where demand stabilizes.

'Cooling' signals: price down, volume down

Tokens that fell alongside contracting volume signaled a different kind of weakness—less panic, but also less interest. Arai (AA) dropped 56% with volume down 15%. FreysaAI (FAI) slid 34% while volume decreased 23%, and Resolv (RESOLV) fell 26% with volume down 16%. This pattern often reflects a market drifting into a lower-activity range, where rebounds may struggle to gain traction without a clear catalyst or renewed liquidity inflow.

Accumulation watch: longer-running names

Among tokens categorized as being in an extended accumulation phase, Super Trust (SUT), tracked since Nov. 19, fell 15% over the week with volume down 2%, suggesting a subdued, wait-and-see posture from traders. Sophon (SOPH), tracked since Dec. 24, was down 1% with volume lower by 19%, pointing to limited demand refresh. Animecoin (ANIME), also tracked since Dec. 24, declined 8% while volume rose 47%, a mix sometimes interpreted as bargain-hunting interest emerging even as price remains under pressure.

New accumulation candidates

In the newly tracked group, WAX (WAXP) was up 2% but saw volume plunge 87%, implying the move may lack breadth. DaoMaker (DAO), on its second day in the accumulation watch, combined a 27% weekly rise with a 1,157% jump in volume—a standout confirmation of aggressive participation. ZetaChain (ZETA), on its third day, fell 3% with volume down 72%, reflecting early-stage inactivity rather than a decisive trend.

Overall, the week’s divergences highlight how 'liquidity'—not just price—often determines whether a breakout holds or fades. While price-and-volume analysis cannot predict outcomes on its own, the mix of confirmed rallies in ONT and DAO alongside heavy selling signals in GIZA illustrates a market where rotation is rapid, attention is selective, and short-term momentum can shift abruptly as participation expands or dries up.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

NYDIG says Strategy’s rapidly expanding STRC issuance has become a meaningful new source of incremental bitcoin demand, but argues the structure is being widely misunderstood. In a March 20 research note, the firm said the preferred-stock complex around Strategy and similar vehicles such as Strive’s SATA should be viewed less as traditional corporate credit and more as a managed, bitcoin-backed liability system whose viability depends on capital markets access and investor confidence.

That distinction matters because Strategy’s latest bitcoin buying has increasingly been financed through preferred equity rather than through the instruments most investors traditionally associate with the company. According to NYDIG, Strategy issued roughly $1.2 billion of STRC over the past week alone, lifting total STRC outstanding to just over $5 billion. Combined with another $5 billion of preferred equity, the company’s total preferred stack now exceeds $10 billion and has overtaken convertible debt in its capital structure.

NYDIG’s central point is that STRC and SATA are “not well understood through the lens of traditional credit or equity.” Instead, the firm wrote, “they are best viewed as actively managed, capital markets–dependent liability structures backed by a reserve asset, bitcoin.” That framing runs through the entire note.

The report argues these securities differ materially from conventional debt. They sit junior to debt but senior to common equity, are unsecured, and come with variable, fully discretionary dividends and limited governance rights. Most importantly, NYDIG says issuers are actively trying to keep them trading near par, usually around $100, through signaling, dividend management and periodic adjustments to dividend rates.

In NYDIG’s view, that means the real constraint is not operating cash flow. “These instruments are not funded by operating cash flow, nor are they designed to be serviced through corporate earnings,” the firm wrote. “Instead, they function as capital markets vehicles in which preferred securities are the core funding product, and the corporate balance sheet, anchored by bitcoin holdings, is constructed to support ongoing issuance.” In that setup, traditional metrics like EBIT-to-interest coverage are not the right tool for judging sustainability.

The note also pushes back on the idea that a bitcoin decline would automatically force liquidations across the structure. Strategy’s debt, NYDIG says, is generally unsecured and carries limited financial covenants unless explicitly specified. Default is “primarily triggered by payment failure or bankruptcy, not mark-to-market declines in asset values,” and that logic extends in important ways to the preferred layer as well. There are no hard triggers tied directly to bitcoin price moves or coverage ratios, even if preferred holders remain more exposed to management discretion and subordination risk.

That leads to the “flywheel” at the center of the report. When preferreds like STRC and SATA trade near par, issuers can raise capital efficiently. That capital is then used to buy bitcoin, expanding the asset base and, in NYDIG’s telling, strengthening balance sheet support. If common equity also trades above NAV, stock issuance becomes accretive on a bitcoin-per-share basis, reinforcing the cycle.

NYDIG describes it as a reflexive loop in which “capital access funds bitcoin purchases, which strengthens the balance sheet and sustains investor confidence, allowing continued issuance.” But it also stresses that the mechanism is conditional rather than permanent. “As long as preferreds remain anchored near par, equity trades above the NAV, and capital markets stay open, the flywheel drives ongoing bitcoin demand,” the report said.

The reverse is also true. If bitcoin falls, confidence weakens, or preferreds slip below par, issuance becomes harder or uneconomic. That can stall the system without requiring insolvency. NYDIG says the burden of adjustment then shifts toward the preferred layer through dividend deferrals, rate changes or deeper subordination as new claims are added.

The firm even frames STRC through an options lens, saying it resembles being short a put on bitcoin asset coverage, with yield earned in exchange for downside risk if bitcoin weakens and erodes the asset cushion. But unlike a standard option, there is no fixed strike or maturity, and outcomes depend heavily on management decisions.

At press time, BTC traded at $70,885.

BTC must break above the 1.0 Fib level, 1-week chart | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Ripple gets accused of “dumping” XRP on the market to fund operations, but on‑chain data tells a different story.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: March 25, 2026 │ 3:52 AM GMT

Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin

A wealth-focused market expert is pushing back against a fast-spreading claim in the XRP community: that Ripple is “dumping” XRP on the market to fund operations and suppress price.

In a detailed breakdown, Kamilah Stevenson argues that this narrative collapses once you examine who Ripple has been selling to, where those tokens go, and what shows up — or doesn’t — on public exchanges.

Ripple’s XRP Sales: Private Deals, Not Exchange Dumping According to Dr. Kamilah Stevenson, Ripple has not sold XRP directly to any public exchange since 2019.

Sponsored

That point, she stresses, is documented in Ripple’s own quarterly market reports, which are publicly available. Instead, “every single XRP that Ripple has sold has gone directly to institutions, private deals, negotiated agreements, off the open market entirely.”

The video draws a sharp line between speculative trades on exchanges and institutional purchases via private contracts.

These institutional buyers, she says, are acquiring “operational inventory” to build financial infrastructure, not tokens to flip on a price move. Deals are reportedly structured with NDAs, escrow, specific release schedules and long-term terms that are unavailable to retail.

The key rule Kamilah Stevenson offers: XRP’s price is moved by tokens entering or leaving public exchanges. Transfers between private wallets, including institutional wallets, are effectively invisible to price discovery because they never touch the order books where supply and demand meet.

The Math: $40 Billion Sold Versus $4 Billion On Exchanges Ms. Stevenson also cites on-chain data & Ripple disclosures claiming that more than 40 billion XRP have been sold to institutions through private deals over time, while public exchanges have “never held more than 4 billion XRP at any point in time.”

If institutions were dumping those holdings back onto exchanges, she argues, exchange balances “would have exploded” and visible selling pressure would have been unavoidable.

Instead, she contends, roughly 40 billion XRP sit in institutional wallets off-exchange, outside the tradable float.

🚨 BREAKING: Ripple secures a banking license — pushing its valuation to $120B with 40B XRP on its balance sheet at ~$3 per #XRP 💥

That instantly puts Ripple in the league of the world’s largest financial institutions.

If #XRP moves past $6, Ripple’s holdings alone could surge… pic.twitter.com/VBuXGWRPdI

— KingXRP (@MRKingXRP) March 24, 2026 That separation between total supply and available supply, she says, is often missed by retail traders who look only at the headline 100 billion XRP figure.

From her perspective, institutional accumulation is quietly shrinking the liquid float while demand-side infrastructure — aided by gradual regulatory clarity, including ongoing attention on measures like the Clarity Act — continues to develop.

Kamilah Stevenson frames this as a positioning story: institutions accessing XRP via private channels at current price levels, while some long-term holders are shaken out by fear-based narratives.

She also briefly pivots to tax and custody strategy, pointing viewers toward holding XRP and other assets in tax-advantaged structures such as a Roth IRA through a specific platform, arguing that structure will matter if a future “supply squeeze” materializes.

The takeaway is less about cheer-leading XRP and more about mechanics: who controls the float, what shows up on exchanges, and how on-chain and exchange data can be used to test emotionally compelling claims about “dumping” or price suppression.

Dig into DailyCoin’s popular crypto news right now:
Binance Unveils AI Pro Beta to Automate Crypto Trading
Solana Shorts Look Crowded: Is SOL Rebound Priced In?

People Also Ask: Does the video claim Ripple has stopped selling XRP entirely?

Not exactly. Dr. Kamilah Stevenson claims Ripple still sells XRP, but only through private institutional deals since 2019, not directly to public exchanges.

What evidence is cited against the “dumping” narrative?

The host points to Ripple’s quarterly reports, on-chain data on institutional wallets, and the relatively low XRP balances historically held on exchanges versus the 40 billion XRP sold privately.

How does the analyst say XRP’s price is actually affected?

By changes in the amount of XRP held on public exchanges; private wallet transfers, including institutional movements, are described as price-neutral unless they eventually hit exchange order books.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Several teams at the Ethereum Foundation have launched “Post-Quantum Ethereum.” This is a dedicated site for Ethereum’s post-quantum security efforts that consolidates the roadmap, specs, research papers, and EIPs into a single public resource.

The website also includes a 14-question FAQ written by the PQ team, and a 6-part interview series. 

A Three-Phase Transition Before Q-DayThe initiative represents the maturation of over eight years of work, tracing back to early STARK-based signature aggregation research that began in 2018. 

Four teams within the Foundation collaborated on the effort. Progress has already moved well beyond theory. More than 10 client teams are actively building and shipping devnets each week through the PQ Interop process. 

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Today, several teams at the EF are launching https://t.co/L9ZOUoRNNB, a dedicated resource for Ethereum's post-quantum security effort.

What started with early STARK-based signature aggregation research in 2018 has grown into a coordinated, multi-team effort, all open source.…

— Ethereum Foundation (@ethereumfndn) March 24, 2026 The team stressed that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer is not imminent. However, the sheer complexity of upgrading a decentralized global network demands years of planning, development, and verification, making it essential to begin work well before any real risk materializes.

“Ethereum’s approach is grounded in cryptographic agility — the ability to upgrade core primitives without destabilizing the network — and in treating this transition as an opportunity to strengthen the protocol’s security, simplicity, and decentralization,” the team added.

Based on the team’s current assessment, L1 protocol upgrades could wrap up by 2029. Full execution-layer migration would take additional years.

The transition follows three phases: readiness and infrastructure, gradual adoption, and protocol-level consolidation. Besides Ethereum, other networks are also taking steps to address a potential quantum threat.

The Solana Foundation has deployed post-quantum digital signatures on a Solana testnet. In January, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong also announced the formation of an independent advisory board focused on quantum computing and blockchain security.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

Bitcoin climbed back above $70,000 as easing geopolitical tensions reduced pressure on risk assets. Ethereum led institutional inflows, while gold posted its sharpest decline in decades.

Crypto Rallies as Bitcoin Surges Past $70K While Gold Sees Historic Decline Crypto markets staged a sharp recovery at the start of the week, with bitcoin reclaiming the $70,000 level as easing geopolitical tensions lifted risk sentiment. The move followed a temporary pause in U.S. strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure, which helped cool oil prices and reduce inflation fears.

Wintermute’s latest market outlook noted that bitcoin rose from the low $68,000 range to trade above $70,000, briefly approaching $71,000. The rebound came after a volatile week in which the asset had fallen roughly 3.4%, pressured by rising oil prices and a hawkish Federal Reserve stance.

The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75%, but its outlook remains firm. Most policymakers now expect little to no rate cuts through 2026.

Geopolitics remains the key driver. Last week, disruptions in the Middle East pushed Brent crude above $112, its highest level in years. The spike fueled inflation concerns and weighed on global markets. However, the latest pause in hostilities has eased some of that pressure, with oil prices falling and risk appetite returning.

Ethereum stood out during the turbulence, with investors appearing drawn to ethereum’s staking yield, especially in a high-rate environment. In contrast, bitcoin ETFs saw short-term outflows during last week’s selloff, though overall flows remain stable.

Gold, often seen as a safe haven, moved in the opposite direction. The metal dropped more than 10%, marking its worst weekly performance in over four decades. A stronger U.S. dollar and forced liquidations contributed to the decline.

Wintermute noted that “The macro ceiling has shifted. Trump’s five-day pause temporarily lowers the geopolitical risk premium in oil markets and resets positioning into the March 27 options expiry.”

Looking ahead, the market’s direction will depend on developments in the Middle East. If oil prices stabilize and shipping routes normalize, bitcoin could retest the $74,000 to $76,000 range. However, renewed disruptions may push prices back toward the mid-$60,000 levels.

For now, crypto markets are responding quickly to shifts in global risk sentiment, highlighting their growing sensitivity to macroeconomic and geopolitical events.

FAQ 🌍 Why did Bitcoin rise above $70,000?
Bitcoin gained as geopolitical tensions eased, lowering oil prices and improving overall market sentiment. What role did the Federal Reserve play?
The Fed kept rates unchanged but signaled fewer cuts ahead, which continues to limit strong upside for crypto. Why is Ethereum seeing strong inflows?
Investors are attracted to ethereum’s staking yield, especially in a high-interest-rate environment. How did gold perform during this period?
Gold fell sharply, posting its worst weekly drop since 1983 due to a stronger dollar and market liquidations.

Traders are watching $1.38 support and $1.42 resistance as compression points to a potential move. Mar 25, 2026, 4:41 a.m.

What to know: XRP is trading in a tight range around $1.41, with buyers defending support near $1.38 and sellers capping gains around $1.42.Whale wallets have accumulated roughly 40 million XRP over the past week, signaling interest during this period of consolidation.Traders are watching for a break above $1.42 to target $1.45 to $1.50, while a drop below $1.38 could open downside toward $1.30.XRP is holding near $1.41 after a steady session, but price is stuck in a tight range, with neither buyers nor sellers taking control. The longer it stays compressed between support and resistance, the more likely a sharper move becomes.

News BackgroundXRP traded in line with the broader crypto market, with no major token-specific catalyst driving price action.Whale wallets added roughly 40 million XRP over the past week, suggesting accumulation during consolidation.Market sentiment remains tied to macro conditions, with crypto reacting cautiously to interest rate expectations.Price Action SummaryXRP gained about 0.6%, moving from roughly $1.38 to $1.41Price traded within a tight $1.38–$1.43 rangeRepeated rejection near $1.42 capped upsideBuyers defended dips near $1.38, forming higher lowsTechnical AnalysisXRP is trading in a tightening range, with support near $1.38 and resistance around $1.42.Higher lows suggest buyers are slowly stepping in, but lack of strong follow-through keeps momentum muted.The structure resembles a compression setup, where price coils before a larger move.Volume is slightly elevated but not strong enough yet to confirm a breakout.What traders say is next?Traders are watching a break above $1.42 for a move toward $1.45–$1.50.If $1.38 support fails, downside could extend toward $1.30.For now, XRP remains range-bound, with the next move likely driven by a break on either side of this tightening range.More For You

Riding the crypto boom to become one of the 2025's hottest stocks, HOOD has shed more than 50% of its value since bitcoin topped in early October.

What to know:

Robinhood opened a new $1.5 billion stock buyback program, which adds more than $1.1 billion to what was already in place.The company expects to execute the buyback over about three years starting in the first quarter of 2026, aiming to reduce shares outstanding and potentially boost earnings per share.Top Stories

XRP price started a downside correction from the $1.4650 zone. The price is now consolidating and might aim for more gains if it stays above the $1.40 zone.

XRP price started a fresh increase above the $1.420 zone. The price is now trading above $1.40 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. There is a bullish trend line forming with support at $1.40 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair (data source from Kraken). The pair could continue to move up if it settles above $1.4250. XRP Price Holds Support XRP price started a decent upward move above $1.4120 and $1.4250, like Bitcoin and Ethereum. The price gained pace for a clear move above the $1.450 resistance.

A high was formed at $1.4650 and the price started a downside correction. There was a move below $1.450 and $1.440. The price dipped below the 61.8% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $1.3612 swing low to the $1.4650 high.

However, the bulls were active above $1.3850 and the 76.4% Fib retracement level of the upward move from the $1.3612 swing low to the $1.4650 high. The price is now trading above $1.40 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average.

If there is a fresh upward move, the price might face resistance near the $1.4250 level. The first major resistance is near the $1.440 level, above which the price could rise and test $1.4650.

Source: XRPUSD on TradingView.com A clear move above the $1.4650 resistance might send the price toward the $1.50 resistance. Any more gains might send the price toward the $1.5250 resistance. The next major hurdle for the bulls might be near $1.550.

Another Drop? If XRP fails to clear the $1.4250 resistance zone, it could start a fresh decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $1.40 level. The next major support is near the $1.3850 level.

If there is a downside break and a close below the $1.3850 level, the price might continue to decline toward $1.3780. The next major support sits near the $1.3620 zone, below which the price could continue lower toward $1.350. Any more losses might call for a test of $1.3320.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for XRP/USD is now losing pace in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for XRP/USD is now above the 50 level.

Major Support Levels – $1.4000 and $1.3850.

Major Resistance Levels – $1.4250 and $1.4400.

As Cardano (ADA) retests a key multi-year level that previously led to significant price increases, some analysts point to on-chain and derivative signals suggesting a potential price recovery for the altcoin.

Cardano Retests Key Macro Support On Tuesday, Cardano dropped 3% to retest a crucial macro support level. The altcoin has been trading between $0.25-$0.30 since the early February market crash, failing to break out of the range’s upper boundary over the past two months.

ADA’s price has retraced to the lower levels of its one-month accumulation zone, hovering between $0.25-$0.27 during recent market volatility. Market observer Ali Martinez pointed out that the cryptocurrency has been retesting a key multi-year level amid this performance.

According to the post, Cardano is retesting the $0.25 area, a major support zone since 2022, in the weekly timeframe. This level marked the bottom of the previous bear market and served as a key area at the start of the latest bull run.

ADA retest key multi-year level. Source: Ali Charts on X As Martinez noted, the last two times ADA traded around and held this level, back in 2023, it bounced 85% and 200%. The first bounce led to a retest of the $0.46 area, while the second drove the price toward the $0.80 level between October 2023 and March 2024.

The analyst also highlighted that ADA recently printed a buy signal, signaling a potential recovery soon. “The TD Sequential indicator has flashed a ‘black 9’ on the weekly chart, suggesting the recent downtrend has exhausted,” he wrote, adding that this setup typically anticipates one to four weeks of expansion.

As a result, ADA could target $0.32-$0.37 by late April if it holds above its current price levels. “We’ve survived the 6-month grind; now we watch for a potential price recovery,” Martinez asserted.

ADA Flashes Bottom Signals Adding to the momentum, analytics firm Santiment has underscored multiple on-chain and derivative signals that could indicate a reversal is nearby for Cardano.

According to the post, Cardano’s average active wallets have experienced a 43% negative return on their investments over the past year, suggesting a price rebound is more likely than usual.

Despite the 71% price decline since September, this extremely negative MVRV value generally indicates that ADA is in an “opportunity” or “buy” zone, Santiment affirmed, further explaining that when average returns are significantly negative, it signals an impending turnaround:

On a zero-sum game, when average returns are severely negative, this is an indication of a looming turnaround with coins always averaging 0% on MVRV’s (average trading returns) across any timeframe. So when other traders are in severe pain, key stakeholders and professional traders are intrigued by this due to the lowered risk of buying or adding on to their positions.

In addition, the firm stated that Cardano’s funding rate on Binance is experiencing the largest imbalance toward shorts since June 2023, suggesting traders are heavily inclined toward further downside.

“Traders are clearly expecting that the #12 market cap will continue to decline in value,” the firm pointed out, noting that “this historically is another bottom signal, as funding rates are always prone to liquidate and send prices in the direction that traders are expecting the least.”

ADA’s performance in the one-week chart. Source: ADAUSDT on TradingView Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com

Two historically contrarian indicators are flashing simultaneously for ADA, with average holders deeply underwater and derivatives traders piling into the most aggressive short positioning in nearly three years.Updated Mar 25, 2026, 5:13 a.m. Published Mar 25, 2026, 5:07 a.m.

The average Cardano holder who bought in the past year is down 43%. The derivatives market is betting it gets worse. But both of those things happening at once have historically meant the opposite.

Santiment data shows ADA's 365-day Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio has fallen to -43%, meaning wallets that have been active on the Cardano network over the past year are sitting on an average loss of 43% on their positions.

The metric is deep in what Santiment labels the "opportunity zone," a band that previous instances in 2023 and late 2024 preceded recoveries as the MVRV mean-reverts toward zero.

MVRV measures average trading returns across a given timeframe, and it always gravitates back toward zero over time. When it's extremely negative, the holders most likely to panic-sell have already sold.

The remaining supply sits in hands that are either committed to holding or have already accepted the loss. That's the kind of positioning that reduces further selling pressure and sets up the conditions for a bounce when any catalyst arrives.

At the same time, Binance's weekly average funding rate for ADA has turned to its most negative reading since June 2023. Funding rates reflect the balance between long and short positioning in perpetual futures. A deeply negative rate means shorts are dominant and paying longs to keep their positions open. In simpler terms, the derivatives market is crowded on the bearish side.

That crowding is what makes it a contrarian signal. When shorts are this concentrated, any positive price movement triggers liquidations that force short sellers to buy back their positions, which pushes the price higher, which triggers more liquidations.

The cascade works in reverse too, but the historical pattern on ADA shows that funding rate extremes of this magnitude have preceded short squeezes more often than they've preceded further declines.

The last time both signals aligned this clearly was mid-2023, when ADA was trading around $0.25 before rallying roughly 300% over the following 18 months. That doesn't mean the same outcome is guaranteed, however, as ADA is down 71% since its September peak, the broader market is dealing with a war, sticky inflation, and no rate cuts in sight, and Cardano's ecosystem metrics haven't produced the kind of usage growth that would justify a fundamental repricing.

But bottom signals aren't about fundamentals. They're about positioning. And the positioning on Cardano right now, with average holders at -43% returns and shorts at a three-year high, is the kind of setup where the next move catches the majority off guard.

ADA was trading at $0.26 on Tuesday, down roughly 7% on the week.

More For You

Traders are watching $1.38 support and $1.42 resistance as compression points to a potential move.

What to know:

XRP is trading in a tight range around $1.41, with buyers defending support near $1.38 and sellers capping gains around $1.42.Whale wallets have accumulated roughly 40 million XRP over the past week, signaling interest during this period of consolidation.Traders are watching for a break above $1.42 to target...

Bitcoin (BTC) price trades near $70,700, flat over the past 24 hours but still holding roughly 10% gains on the month. The 8-hour chart shows an ascending channel that has been building since early February, with multiple breakout attempts that have failed. Possible easing in geopolitical tensions has helped stabilize the price, but underneath, two opposing forces are pulling in different directions.

On one side, retail holders and whales are both moving Bitcoin to exchanges, a pattern that typically precedes selling. On the other hand, the derivatives market has flipped bullish. When spot flows and derivatives positioning diverge this sharply, the resolution tends to be violent. The question is which side gives first. If the spot sellers are right, the 10% monthly rally may have walked straight into a liquidity trap built by leveraged optimism.

Retail and Whales Are Moving to Exchanges in TandemThe on-chain data reveals a coordinated shift toward exchanges across multiple holder cohorts. According to CryptoQuant, the 0.1 to 1 BTC cohort, a proxy for retail participants, nearly doubled its exchange inflows from approximately 394 BTC to 682 BTC over three days. This is not an isolated retail event.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

BTC Retail Exchange Inflows: CryptoQuantThe largest Bitcoin whales followed. The 1,000 to 10,000 BTC cohort moved 444 BTC to exchanges on March 23. By March 24, that figure had surged to 2,788 BTC, a roughly 528% increase in a single day. The 10,000+ BTC holders joined the same day, with 3,000 BTC moved to exchanges.

When both retail and whale cohorts increase exchange inflows simultaneously, after a relatively silent phase between March 20 and March 22, it suggests that selling pressure is building across the entire holder spectrum, not just one segment.

BTC Whale Exchange Inflows: CryptoQuantThe pattern is notable because it is synchronized. Retail and whales rarely move in the same direction at the same time. When they do, the combined flow tends to create meaningful sell-side pressure, particularly if the price fails to hold a key technical level.

Derivatives Stay Bullish, and That Is the RiskWhile spot holders are moving to exchanges, the derivatives market is leaning the opposite way. The total funding rate for Bitcoin flipped from -0.0028 on March 23 to +0.006, a sharp swing into positive territory. Positive funding means long positions are paying short positions to maintain their bets, indicating the market is net long.

Meanwhile, open interest has held relatively flat, dipping marginally from $22.67 billion to $22.55 billion. However, the rise in funding rate even on a flat day shows the bullishness in play.

BTC Open Interest and Funding Rate: SantimentThe divergence between spot and derivatives is the core risk. Spot holders are positioning to sell. Derivatives traders are positioning for a bounce. If the spot selling overwhelms the derivatives optimism and price drops below a key support, the leveraged longs face forced liquidation.

That cascade of long closures would accelerate the move lower, turning derivative bullishness into the very fuel that powers the correction. This is the long liquidation cascade risk that the current setup is quietly building. The only saving grace here is that the open interest (aka leverage) hasn’t risen insanely, yet.

These Bitcoin Price Levels Could Resolve the Tug of WarThe 8-hour chart frames the decision zone, with BTC continuing to move inside a rising channel since late February. Bitcoin price is currently testing the 100-period Exponential Moving Average (EMA), an indicator that gives more weight to recent price data to identify trend direction, at $70,700. The last time BTC cleanly reclaimed this EMA in mid-March, it rallied approximately 8%.

BTC Ascending Channel: TradingViewA similar reclamation above $70,900 would signal near-term strength and a possible push toward $72,800 and eventually $76,000, closer to the channel’s upper boundary. All of this could happen if the Iran-US ceasefire talks advance.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: TradingViewHowever, if the EMA reclamation fails, the downside levels become critical. The 0.5 Fibonacci at $69,300 is the first support. Below that, $67,700 (0.618 Fib) represents a strong floor-like zone. A daily close below $67,700 would confirm that the spot selling pressure has won and open the path toward $65,400 and even $62,600.

Currently, an 8-hour close above $70,900 is what separates a potential channel bounce from a long cascade that the exchange inflow data is warning about.

Skip to content

News Predictions Converter Calculator Podcast Active Currencies: 18,028

Market Cap: $2.509T

Bitcoin Dominance: 56.55%

24h Market Cap Change: $1.00

There has been one significant absence in Ethereum's market.

Updated 11:00 IST March 25, 2026

Ethereum [ETH] may not be as strong as it seems right now. While the price might look momentarily steady, there’s more to this than what meets the eye.

Large players have continued to stay active, but will this pace hold without retail support?

Not enough demand for Ethereum According to a recent report, Ethereum faces weaker demand from U.S investors, even with global activity. The Coinbase Premium Index, which compares ETH prices on Coinbase and Binance, was negative with a value of around -0.0149 at press time.

Source: Cryptoquant Put simply, this means Ethereum [ETH] might be trading cheaper on Coinbase, than on Binance. That means lower buying pressure or a hike in selling in the U.S.

Here, what’s interesting is that this gap has persisted even during a recovery. No matter how brief it may be. A move back towards neutral or positive levels, however, would prove improved sentiment and stronger support from U.S investors.

The whales are here, but retail is not Things get clear when looking at order flow. While U.S demand has been weak, large players have been active in the market.

In fact, CryptoQuant data highlighted consistently elevated average order sizes. So, whale-sized trades have been dominating Ethereum’s spot activity.

Source: Ethereum What’s missing, however, is retail participation. There’s little indication of smaller order flows picking up alongside these larger trades. The market structure has been pretty one-sided.

Such setups may lack staying power.

Steady, but not quite powerful Source: TradingView On the daily chart, Ethereum [ETH] held on above the $2,100-zone. However, it looked shaky at best. Especially since while the RSI was at neutral levels, the MACD was flat. Put simply, its recent push has been losing strength.

Source: Coinalyze Derivatives numbers appeared to be of a similar vein too. Open Interest fell lower from earlier highs – A sign that traders may be stepping back.

At the same time, Funding Rates suggested longs were still dominant… but not aggressively so.

Final Summary Ethereum doesn’t have much U.S demand. Whale activity has been dominant, but lack of retail support makes any upside fragile. Related Articles

Home Ethereum Is Ethereum cheaper in the U.S? Demand is starting to fade and…

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 24, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE) between November 5, 2025 and February 26, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 5, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Eos Energy securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Eos Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18041 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 5, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Eos Energy was unable to achieve the ramp in production and capacity utilization required to achieve its previously set guidance; (2) Eos Energy's battery line downtime was running well above industry norms, the design intent of the line, and internal forecasts; (3) Eos Energy was experiencing delays in the ability for its automated bipolar production to hit quality targets; (4) Eos Energy's inadequate systems and processes prevented it from ensuring reasonably accurate guidance and that its public disclosures were timely, accurate, and complete; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Eos Energy's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Eos Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18041 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289840

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Six top Meta execs are set to receive huge pay increases — excluding CEO Mark Zuckerberg. But that hinges on Meta meeting "exceedingly aggressive" stock prices over five years, Meta said.

March 24, 2026 – TheNewswire - Toronto, ON - Total Metals Corp. (“Total Metals” or the “Company”) (TSX-V: TT) (OTCQB: TTTMF) (FSE: O4N) restates its press release from Monday, March 23, 2026.

Total Metals is pleased to announce the closing of its acquisition of the Menary Gold Project (the “Property”), as previously announced on December 22, 2025 (the “Transaction”).

Menary Gold Project

As previously disclosed in the Company’s press release dated December 22, 2025, the Property consists of 27 mining claims and 1 mining lease comprising an area of 276.5 hectares and is strategically located in the Kenora Mining Division of Ontario.  The Property shares a common southern boundary with the Rainy River claims being acquired by Coeur Mining, Inc. ("Coeur") following its ~US$7 billion acquisition of New Gold Inc.

Property Highlights:

Galbraith "A" Zone Grab Samples: Exceptional high-grade grab samples returning 8,120 g/t Au, 1,885 g/t Au, and 1,400 g/t Au, confirming the presence of bonanza-grade shoots. 

Galbraith "A" Channel Sampling: Continuous channel sampling across the shear structure returned 243.00 g/t Au over 1.0 metre and 45.38 g/t Au over 1.0 metre, demonstrating width continuity of the high-grade zones. 

Wagg Zone Drilling: Diamond drill hole MIN-11-18 intersected 16.99 g/t Au over 6.3 metres (core length), identifying a new, previously unknown mineralized zone at depth. 

Strategic Location: The Menary Property is located approximately 65 km northwest of Fort Frances and borders the land package of the Rainy River Mine. The recent acquisition of New Gold by Coeur Mining for an estimated $7 billion validates the district as a premier North American mining jurisdiction. 

Transaction Details

Pursuant to the Option Agreement, the Destroismaisons granted the Company an exclusive right to acquire a 100% interest in the Property, subject to an existing NSR (as defined below), by making aggregate payments of $1,010,000 in cash and issuing $1,010,000 in common shares in the capital of the Company (each, a “Share”) over a four-year period.

The consideration is structured as follows: (i) $210,000 in cash and $210,000 in Shares within five days of TSXV acceptance (the “First Payment”); and (ii) $200,000 in cash and $200,000 in Shares on each of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the Acceptance. Share issuances will be priced based on the prior 20-day volume weighted average price of the Shares trading on the TSXV, with $0.35 per share being the minimum share price and an aggregate maximum of 2,885,714 being issued. Upon completion of all payments and Share issuances, the Company will have earned a 100% interest in the Property, subject to the net smelter royalty of four and a half percent (4.5%) payable to Western Troy Capital Corp. (as to 3%) and William McNerney (as to 1.5%) (the “NSR”).

The Transaction was arm’s length. The First Payment, consisting of a cash payment of $210,000 and the issuance of 507,678 common shares at a deemed price of $0.41365 per share, was made on Tuesday, March 24, 2026.  The shares are subject to a standard four month and one day hold period, as required by National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus Exemptions and are not subject to any additional escrow or resale restrictions

Qualified Person

Robert Penczak, M.Sc., P.Geo (Ontario), Vice President of Exploration for the Company and a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information used in this news release.

About Total Metals Corp.

Total Metals Corp. is focused on its 100% owned Electrolode Project covering over 3,300 contiguous hectares in northwestern Ontario. The Electrolode Project is targeting high-potential critical mineral plus gold resources and targets in three favorable geologic trends, located near major mines in the Red Lake Gold camp and is strategically located between Kinross Gold’s Great Bear Project and First Mining Gold’s Springpole Project. The Electrolode Project is fully permitted for exploration drilling and hosts 10 historic mineralized zones with significant expansion potential plus new, untested targets ready for further exploration. Total Metals also owns 100% of the High Lake and West Hawk Lake Project covering 958 hectares in two gold properties located along the Trans-Canada Highway straddling the Manitoba / Ontario border. The Purex Zone on the High Lake property has significant exploration potential and will be the primary target for initial exploration and potential future mining activities. The West Hawk Lake property is comprised of a single mineral lease, located within southeastern Manitoba.

www.totalmetalscorp.com

Cautionary Statements

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in its policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy of this release.

Tyler Thorburn

President and Chief Executive Officer

[email protected]

(416) 873-7662

Forward-Looking Information

This press release includes “forward-looking information” that is subject to assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Statements in this news release which are not purely historical are forward looking.  Although the Company believes that any forward-looking statements in this news release are reasonable, there can be no assurance that any such forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate. The Company cautions readers that all forward-looking statements, are based on assumptions none of which can be assured and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements represent management’s best judgment based on information currently available. Readers are advised to rely on their own evaluation of such risks and uncertainties and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements and information contained in this news release are made as of the date hereof and no undertaking is given to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless so required by applicable securities laws or the TSX-V. The forward-looking statements or information contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

 

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 24, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE) between December 1, 2023 and December 9, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 24, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Lakeland securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Lakeland class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50020 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 24, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Lakeland was experiencing significant, sustained issues with its Pacific Helmets and Jolly businesses, including, inter alia, shipping-related delays, production issues, and slower than expected rollout of new products; (2) accordingly, defendants overstated the anticipated and actual positive impact of these businesses on Lakeland's financial results, as well as the overall strength and quality of Pacific Helmets' and Jolly's respective operations; (3) Lakeland's business and financial results were significantly deteriorating because of, inter alia, tariff-related headwinds and timing, certification delays, and material flow issues in its acquired businesses; (4) accordingly, defendants overstated the strength of their tariff mitigation measures and "small, strategic, and quick" ("SSQ") M&A strategy; (5) as a result of all the foregoing issues, defendants' financial guidance was unreliable; and (6) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Lakeland class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50020 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289704

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

795 Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in OBDC over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

The stock market sometimes punishes both deserving and undeserving companies during periods of uncertainty, creating buying opportunities for long-term investors willing to sift through the beaten-down stocks to find the high-quality companies that have been oversold.

Year to date, shares of financial data and ratings specialist Moody's (MCO 3.01%) and swimming pool supplier Pool Corp (POOL 0.98%) are down sharply, falling 16% and 11%, respectively. But a closer look at the fundamentals of both businesses suggests these pullbacks might be an overreaction. Both companies operate incredibly durable models, generate substantial cash flow, and have a long history of returning capital to shareholders through consistently growing dividends.

For income-focused investors looking to buy the dip, here is why these two oversold dividend stocks are worth a closer look today.

Image source: Getty Images.

Moody's Despite the stock's recent 16% slide, Moody's underlying business is performing exceptionally well. The company's fourth-quarter revenue for 2025 rose 13% year over year to $1.89 billion. And profitability grew even faster. Moody's reported non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings per share of $3.64 for the period, up from $2.62 in the year-ago quarter.

A major driver of this top-line momentum was its "Moody's Investors Service" segment, where revenue climbed 17% year over year. A robust corporate finance environment and record-high fourth-quarter issuance in infrastructure finance helped fuel the segment's strength. And the company's analytics segment -- which generates recurring subscription revenue -- also contributed, growing 9% year over year.

"Our 2025 results demonstrate the tremendous demand for Moody's solutions and our ability to execute with precision and speed," management noted in the company's fourth-quarter earnings release.

Today's Change

(

-3.01

%) $

-13.26

Current Price

$

427.81

Additionally, Moody's recently raised its dividend by 10%, lifting its quarterly payout to $1.03 per share. This marked the company's 17th consecutive year of dividend increases.

While the stock's dividend yield of about 0.9% as of this writing might not look particularly appealing to investors seeking income, the safety and growth trajectory of the payout are compelling. Moody's boasts a highly conservative payout ratio of about 29%. This means the financial giant retains plenty of capital to reinvest in its business while still having ample room to support future dividend hikes.

Following the recent sell-off, Moody's trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of about 31. While that still represents a premium, it is a reasonable price tag for a high-margin compounder that just delivered 20% growth in adjusted earnings per share for the full year.

Pool Corp Unlike Moody's, Pool Corp is navigating a much more challenging macroeconomic environment. The wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies is working through cyclical headwinds, as high interest rates and cautious consumer spending continue to weigh on new pool construction.

This pressure showed up in the company's fourth-quarter results for 2025. Pool Corp's revenue declined roughly 1% year over year to $982.2 million. And earnings per share fell 13% to $0.85, down from $0.98 in the year-ago quarter.

Today's Change

(

-0.98

%) $

-2.02

Current Price

$

203.24

But there is a silver lining.

The core of Pool Corp's business relies on non-discretionary maintenance products. Because the existing installed base of pools requires constant upkeep regardless of the economic environment, this creates a floor for the company's cash flow. Management noted in the fourth-quarter earnings release that sales of these non-discretionary items remained "steady throughout the year."

Further, the company observed improving sales trends for discretionary products during the second half of 2025.

Further, even in a cyclically depressed environment, Pool Corp's dividend is highly secure. The company maintains a payout ratio of roughly 45%. And the business continues to prioritize returning capital to shareholders. Last spring, Pool Corp boosted its quarterly dividend by 4% to $1.25 per share, extending its streak of consecutive annual dividend increases to 15 years.

Today, the stock offers a dividend yield of approximately 2.4% as of this writing. And with shares down 11% this year, the stock trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 19. Given that this multiple is based on earnings currently suppressed by a cyclical downturn, the valuation looks quite attractive. Once the macroeconomic picture brightens and demand for new pool construction rebounds, Pool Corp is well positioned to see its earnings-per-share growth reaccelerate.

I believe that both Moody's and Pool Corp represent high-quality businesses that are simply facing temporary stock price weakness. Moody's offers investors a chance to buy a thriving financial data powerhouse at a more reasonable valuation, and Pool Corp provides a compelling turnaround play with a respectable 2.5% yield.

While both stocks have their risks, including the disruptive nature of AI and its potential impact on Moody's business, as well as the possibility of a lull in pool construction lasting longer than expected, I think buying the dip on these two proven dividend growers will likely prove to be a smart move over the long haul.

Microsoft (MSFT 2.68%) has probably been the most consistently dominant tech company of the last 50 years.

However, in the AI era, which Microsoft helped spark with its OpenAI partnership, Microsoft suddenly finds itself on the outside looking in.

In less than five months, Microsoft stock has fallen by nearly a third, even as the tech giant has continued to deliver strong results. The Windows-maker has gotten swept up in broader concerns about the AI threat on enterprise software, as virtually the entire software sector has fallen from Anthropic's rollout of new disruptive agents. There have also been anecdotal reports about companies replacing traditional enterprise software programs with custom tools created with AI, often known as vibecoding.

Microsoft now trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 23 based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) earnings, which is cheaper than it was at its low point during the 2022 bear market, and about the cheapest it's been in ten years.

Microsoft's recent results have also been impressive. In its fiscal second quarter, revenue jumped 17% to $81.3 billion, and adjusted net income rose 23% to $30.9 billion, or $4.14 per share.

Trading at a discount to the S&P 500 and growing 20%, is Microsoft a bargain? One Wall Street analyst thinks so.

Image source: Microsoft.

Is Microsoft going to $500? Bank of America reinstated coverage on Microsoft with a buy rating and a price target of $500, implying 34% upside.

The analyst noted that Microsoft is in a unique position among tech companies as it is able to capitalize on AI both as an infrastructure company through its Azure cloud computing service and as a software application provider with products like Office 365.

In an ideal outcome in the AI evolution, those two businesses support each other as customers rely on Azure to provide the AI compute and infrastructure it needs, while they use Microsoft software programs to perform daily tasks and AI workflows. BofA analyst Tal Liani went on to say that Microsoft is "at the center of the AI supercycle" and will be "a primary beneficiary of AI monetization."

That note wasn't enough to lift Microsoft stock as it came out on the same day that Anthropic is roiling the software sector, but the argument is worth a closer look from investors.

Today's Change

(

-2.68

%) $

-10.26

Current Price

$

372.74

The downside looks limited While Microsoft is likely to soar if Liani is correct that it's at the center of the AI supercycle, it's also worth considering the downside in the stock at this point, with Microsoft already down 33%.

Microsoft is in a much different position from pure-play enterprise software companies like Salesforce and ServiceNow, as it's diversified across multiple businesses, including, in addition to software and Azure, Windows, gaming with Xbox and Activision Blizzard, LinkedIn, ads through Bing and news, devices like the Surface tablet, as well as other products. It also has a stake in OpenAI, valued at $135 billion at the end of October and likely worth more now.

With the 33% sell-off, investors seem to be pricing in the decline of its software business, which is far from a given. Microsoft reports results in three business segments. Its largest by revenue is Productivity and Business Processes at $34.1 billion, which is mostly made up of its cloud software applications. However, its fastest-growing is intelligent cloud, which was up 29% in its most recent quarter to $32.9 billion. Its smallest segment is the More Personal Computing, which brought in $14.3 billion in the quarter.

Productivity and Business Processes still make up more than half of its operating income, but that should change as its cloud unit grows.

Overall, the numbers show that Microsoft's cloud software business is significant, but it makes up less than 40% of the company's revenue. Currently, the stock is priced as if software is on the verge of a decline when it grew 17% in the most recent quarter.

Based on that, the strong growth in cloud and its valuation, Microsoft looks like a buy. It may take a while for the AI disruption narrative to change, but Microsoft is in a better position than any other software company to recover the recent losses.

20.94K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in BNED over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 24, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) between July 23, 2025 and February 3, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 4, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Boston Scientific common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Boston Scientific class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55398 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 4, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants made positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Boston Scientific's U.S. Electrophysiology segment; notably, that management was aware that the segment's growth rate was unsustainable and that it was approaching an earlier tipping point than the market was anticipating. Due to defendants' statements of confidence and lofty expectations, investors and analysts were left surprised by Boston Scientific's net income miss and underwhelming guidance for the first half of fiscal 2026. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Boston Scientific class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55398 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289829

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 24, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE: PFSI) resulting from allegations that PennyMac may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased PennyMac securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51887 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On January 29, 2026, PennyMac filed a Current Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K announcing PennyMac's fourth quarter and full-year 2025 financial results. The report stated that PennyMac's "servicing segment pretax income was $37.3 million, down from $157.4 million in the prior quarter and $87.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024," as well as "[retax income excluding valuation-related items was $47.8 million, down 70 percent from the prior quarter driven primarily by increased realization of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) cash flows as lower mortgage rates drove higher prepayment activity."

On this news, PennyMac's stock price fell $49.78 per share, or 33.3%, to close at $99.92 per share on January 30, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289757

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

If you're looking for tech stocks that could go parabolic, you're going to want to find stocks in emerging fields, that also have big potential growth. Let's look at two stocks that aren't household names that fit that bill.

1. IonQ

Today's Change

(

-1.24

%) $

-0.41

Current Price

$

32.70

Quantum computing has the potential to be the next big technological breakthrough after artificial intelligence (AI), and one company that is positioning itself to be a leader in this field is IonQ (IONQ 1.24%). What differentiates IonQ from the competition is that its technology has proven to be one of the most accurate, with it achieving 99.99% two-qubit gate fidelity (accuracy). Accuracy is one of the biggest hurdles in quantum computing, and its trapped ion technology, which uses more stable atoms as qubits, and electronic quantum core (EQC) technology, which uses microwave electronics integrated directly into its chips, have helped separate it from the pack.

At the same time, the company is trying to control the entire quantum ecosystem. Over the years, it has made acquisitions to acquire technology and talent in the areas of quantum sensing, networking, and transmission. More recently, it agreed to acquire quantum foundry SkyWater Technology, which will allow it to more tightly integrate its designs into the manufacturing process, make prototypes more quickly, and be able to scale its chips more easily.

It's a high-risk, high-reward stock, but it has huge potential given its early leadership in quantum computing.

Image source: Getty Images.

2. SoundHound AI

Today's Change

(

-7.69

%) $

-0.53

Current Price

$

6.36

SoundHound AI (SOUN 7.69%) has already been seeing hypergrowth, but its biggest opportunity may still be ahead. At its heart, SoundHound is an AI voice company that combines "speech-to-meaning" and "deep meaning understanding" technology to help AI assistants understand intent and interact with people more naturally. The company has made major inroads in the automotive and restaurant industries with this technology.

However, its acquisition of Amelia, a leader in virtual agents in such fields as healthcare, financial services, and retail, has set it on a new path. The company has combined its AI voice technology with Amelia's virtual agents to create a voice-first agentic AI platform. SoundHound has been rolling out this new technology with its new Amelia 7 platform update, which gives it a big opportunity to become a leader in agentic AI customer service. This is a huge potential market, and if its voice AI tech proves to be a key differentiator when it comes to AI agents, then the company will continue to see robust revenue growth moving forward.

Like IonQ, SoundHound is a high-risk, high-reward stock that has the potential to go parabolic.

Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends IonQ, SkyWater Technology, and SoundHound AI. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

New stock option program could pay some executives hundreds of millions of dollars if they reach aggressive growth targets.

Dogecoin is back at a technical level that historically favored accumulation, with the memecoin testing long-term support as weekly momentum cools. The setup, laid out by Cryptoinsightuk’s Will Taylor, points to a potential 300% move if DOGE can once again trade the upper end of its multi-year range.

Will The Dogecoin Price Explode By 300%? Taylor’s thesis is built almost entirely on structure. On the weekly DOGE/USDT chart he shared, Dogecoin was sitting near $0.09006, pressed into the lower boundary of a broad pennant formation that has contained price action for years. The same chart marked a projected move to roughly $0.27304, labeled as a 302.43% upside swing from current levels.

“DOGE is technically at such an interesting level again,” Taylor wrote on X. “Weekly RSI looks compressed as downside momentum slows. We are revisiting a previous area of accumulation / support AND at the bottom of a wider range (Bull Pennant). We are also at the area of most trading volume, can often be a reversal area.”

Dogecoin pennant formation, weekly chart | Source: X @Cryptoinsightuk That combination is the core of the bullish case. In Taylor’s view, Dogecoin is not just drifting into support in price terms; it is also returning to the heaviest historical trading zone on the volume profile, a region where buyers and sellers previously did the most business.

For technical traders, that kind of confluence matters. A prior accumulation band, a long-term rising support line and a high-volume node clustered in the same area can strengthen the argument that downside is becoming less efficient.

The weekly RSI reading is also central to his call. Taylor did not attach a numeric target for the indicator, but the chart shows RSI compressed near the lower end of its recent range, with the momentum curve flattening after a long decline. His reading is that selling pressure is slowing rather than accelerating, which makes the current zone more interesting for spot accumulation than for momentum shorts.

“If you accumulate and only play the range itself you’re looking at 300% to the upside,” he said. “The technical argument would be it breaks out positively too. I am going to have a few stabs at doge here I think. Great for a spot buy technically though imo.”

Taylor also posted a DOGE/gold chart via X. On that weekly pair, Dogecoin appears to be revisiting a marked support zone after a long drawdown, while RSI again looks subdued and close to oversold territory. Relative-strength charts like DOGE/gold do not guarantee a reversal in USD terms, but they can reinforce the idea that the asset is approaching an area where its underperformance may be getting stretched.

DOGE/Gold bottom signal | Source: X @Cryptoinsightuk At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09346.

DOGE hovers above key support, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

TL;DR:

Market Cap Impact: The meme coin sector reached a $33.4 billion market cap before selling pressure cooled down prices. Geopolitical Context: The pause in tensions between the U.S. and Iran briefly eased market anxiety, boosting risk assets. Critical Technical Levels: Dogecoin is struggling to maintain support at $0.092, while Shiba Inu closely watches the $0.000006 threshold. A highly volatile session took place this Tuesday in the digital asset market, marked by a retreat in memecoins. Iconic tokens such as Pepe, Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu gave back the gains achieved during a brief rally. This adjustment occurs in a context where the total crypto market capitalization stands at $2.43 trillion.

During the session, Pepe’s trading volume surged by 93%, reaching $454.59 million. Meanwhile, Bitcoin remained above $71,000, acting as an anchor for the sector as high-speculation altcoins sought to consolidate their supports following the rally fueled by the geopolitical truce announced by the Trump administration.

Before retreating to the $0.0932 zone, Dogecoin led part of the movement, rising 4.44% to reach $0.0942. Technical analysts identify a possible inverse head-and-shoulders pattern, suggesting a medium-term trend reversal if it manages to break through the $0.0955 resistance.

Technical Analysis of Shiba Inu and Pepe Coin Thanks to an increase in its token burn rate, Shiba Inu remained resilient, reducing circulating supply and allowing the price to stay above $0.00000613. However, the lack of sustained macroeconomic momentum has limited the bulls’ ability to test levels above $0.00000650.

As for Pepe, the asset showed signs of massive buyer participation before stabilizing at $0.00000349. Despite the initial enthusiasm, a “risk-off” sentiment seems to have partially returned, forcing these assets to seek liquidity at lower levels to avoid a major capitulation.

In summary, the current cooling of the meme sector reflects natural profit-taking following relief in international tensions, leaving investors waiting for clearer signals from Bitcoin to resume the bullish path.