People use DBS automated teller machines (ATMs) in Singapore March 31, 2022. REUTERS/Caroline Chia Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
SummaryCompaniesQ4 net profit at S$2.26 bln vs S$2.55 bln estimateNet interest margin declined to 1.93% in Q4Wealth AUM hits new high of S$488 billion in Q4Announces higher 66 cent final ordinary dividendROE at 13.5% in Q4 vs 15.8% a year agoSINGAPORE, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Singapore's biggest bank DBS Group (DBSM.SI), opens new tab on Monday maintained expectation that net profit this year will dip slightly from 2025's, after posting a 10% drop in fourth-quarter earnings that was weighed down by a lower net interest margin.
DBS, which is also Southeast Asia's largest bank by assets, said October-December net profit dropped to S$2.26 billion ($1.78 billion) from S$2.52 billion a year earlier.
The Week in Breakingviews newsletter offers insights and ideas from Reuters' global financial commentary team. Sign up here.
That missed the mean estimate of nearly S$2.55 billion from two analysts, according to LSEG data.
For the period, overall group net interest margin, a key profitability gauge, stood at 1.93% as compared to 2.15% the previous year, with net interest income impacted by lower domestic rates. Return on equity declined to 13.5% from 15.8% a year ago.
The lender's wealth segment's assets under management meanwhile grew 19% in constant-currency terms to a new high of S$488 billion in the fourth quarter.
In slides accompanying the results, CEO Tan Su Shan said group net interest income in 2026 is expected to be "slightly below 2025 levels", assuming a Singapore overnight rate average (SORA) of around 1.25%, two Federal Reserve rate cuts and a stronger Singapore dollar.
Net profit for the year is similarly expected to come in lower than in 2025, Tan added.
According to the bank's financial statement, provisions for bad loans jumped 81% to S$415 million in the fourth quarter, mainly due to real-estate exposure, while DBS wrote back S$206 million in general allowances, including amounts previously set aside for that exposure.
The bank declared an ordinary dividend of S$0.66 per share and a capital return dividend of S$0.15 per share for the fourth quarter.
DBS is the first Singapore lender to start this earnings season. Smaller peers United Overseas Bank (UOBH.SI), opens new tab and Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp (OCBC.SI), opens new tab are due to announce their results on February 24 and 25, respectively.
($1 = 1.2707 Singapore dollars)
Reporting by Rae Wee and Yantoultra Ngui; Editing by Cynthia Osterman, Mark Porter and Stephen Coates
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Yantoultra Ngui is the Southeast Asia Deals Correspondent of Reuters in Singapore, covering M&A and capital market activities in a region that is fast emerging as one of the world’s biggest economies. He previously was a reporter at Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ). Notably, he was part of WSJ's team that covered the financial scandal at Malaysian state fund 1MDB, and that won SOPA Excellence in Breaking News award for the coverage of the assassination of Kim Jong Nam, the half-brother of North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un, in Malaysia in 2018. Yantoultra graduated with an MBA in Finance from Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) in 2010.
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 17:481mo ago
PFSI Investors Have Opportunity to Join PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. Fraud Investigation with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (“PennyMac” or “the Company”) (NYSE: PFSI) for violations of the securities laws.
The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. PennyMac filed a Form 8-K with the SEC on January 29, 2026, announcing its Q4 and full-year 2025 financial results. According to the Company, its "servicing segment pretax income was $37.3 million, down from $157.4 million in the prior quarter and $87.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024," and "retax income excluding valuation-related items was $47.8 million, down 70 percent from the prior quarter driven primarily by increased realization of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) cash flows as lower mortgage rates drove higher prepayment activity." Based on this news, shares of PennyMac fell by 33.3% on the next day.
If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.
We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].
The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
The cloud computing colossus is spending like mad to win the artificial intelligence (AI) race.
Shares of Amazon.com (AMZN 5.49%) tumbled 12% this past week, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, after the e-commerce titan forecast a staggering $200 billion in capital expenditures for 2026.
Image source: Amazon.
Sales and profits are growing nicely Amazon's fourth-quarter results weren't the problem.
Revenue jumped 14% to $213 billion, while operating income leaped 18% to $25 billion. The gains were driven by broad-based growth across Amazon's retail, advertising, and cloud businesses.
Today's Change
(
-5.49
%) $
-12.22
Current Price
$
210.47
Yet capex is set to grow even faster Here's the statement from Amazon CEO Andy Jassy that spooked investors (emphasis added):
With such strong demand for our existing offerings and seminal opportunities like AI, chips, robotics, and low earth orbit satellites, we expect to invest about $200 billion in capital expenditures across Amazon in 2026.
The first part of what Jassy said is just fine. Amazon is enjoying booming demand for its artificial intelligence (AI) services, custom-designed semiconductor chips used by its cloud computing customers, warehouse automation tools, and its forthcoming space-based internet offerings.
However, Wall Street had expected Amazon to spend about $150 billion on its promising expansion initiatives. The extra $50 billion or so was a wee bit more than many investors were comfortable with, so they decided to sell their shares.
Joe Tenebruso has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:101mo ago
Worried About Amazon's AI Spending? 9 Words From Andy Jassy That Should Ease Your Mind
Amazon offers AI customers access to AI chips and other key products and services.
Though investors have been bullish on artificial intelligence (AI) stocks over the past few years, in recent times, they've started to worry about one thing in particular: spending. The concern is that cloud companies may build out too much capacity -- and then be left with this extra infrastructure, and the costs it involves, if demand falters.
This risk, along with the high valuations of many growth stocks, has periodically weighed on AI stocks. We saw a pullback amid these concerns back in November, for example. So, it's not too surprising that last week, when Amazon (AMZN 5.49%) announced its plan for $200 billion in 2026 capital spending, in part to address AI demand, the stock immediately slipped in pre-market trading.
But if you're worried about Amazon's AI spending, consider the following nine words from chief executive officer Andy Jassy. They should ease your mind -- and even encourage you to get in on Amazon shares.
Image source: Getty Images.
How Amazon fits into the AI story First, let's take a quick look at how Amazon fits into the AI story. You may know the company best for its e-commerce business, but Amazon also is present in the world of cloud computing. In fact, Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the global leader in this industry. Customers come to AWS for a variety of services, but AI has driven growth in recent times.
AWS offers AI customers everything they need for their projects: from its in-house-developed chips that appeal to cost-conscious customers to high-end chips from market leader Nvidia. AWS also sells access to a fully managed service, Amazon Bedrock, that allows customers to adapt popular large language models to their needs.
All of this has driven tremendous growth at AWS. In the recent quarter, Amazon reported a $142 billion annual revenue run rate for AWS as the unit's revenue soared 24%. That's the strongest growth rate in 13 quarters.
Today's Change
(
-5.49
%) $
-12.22
Current Price
$
210.47
Jassy's reassuring words Now, let's consider Jassy's words. "Customers really want AWS for core and AI workloads," he said during the company's earnings call.
The fact that customers are turning to AWS for both non-AI and AI projects suggests that even if AI demand slips, Amazon could still generate growth through non-AI projects. This should ease your mind if you worry about a slowdown in AI growth.
On top of this, Jassy said that as the company adds new capacity, it's monetizing it immediately. All of this should reassure investors as Amazon begins this new wave of spending, as it shows that the company isn't entirely dependent on AI demand -- and is quickly delivering returns on its investments.
All of this makes Amazon a great stock to own, whether the AI boom stalls or continues to gather momentum.
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:201mo ago
Oil drops more than 1% as concerns about possible US-Iran conflict ease
A drone view of a pump jack and drilling rig south of Midland, Texas, U.S. June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Eli Hartman Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
SINGAPORE, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Oil prices dropped more than 1% at Monday's open as concerns about a possible conflict in the Middle East between the U.S. and Iran eased after both countries finished a round of talks on Friday.
Brent crude futures fell 89 cents, or 1.31%, to $67.16 a barrel by 2309 GMT.
The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $62.76 a barrel, down 79 cents, or 1.24%.
Iran's top diplomat said on Friday that nuclear talks with the U.S. mediated by Oman were off to a “good start” and set to continue, in remarks that could help allay concern that failure to reach a deal might nudge the Middle East closer to war.
Reporting by Florence Tan; Editing by Jamie Freed
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:221mo ago
NUAI Announcement: If You Have Suffered Losses in New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: NUAI), You Are Encouraged to Contact The Rosen Law Firm About Your Rights
WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ: NUAI) resulting from allegations that New Era Energy & Digital may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
SO WHAT: If you purchased New Era Energy & Digital securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=49293 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On December 12, 2025, Investing.com published an article entitled “New Era Energy & Digital stock falls after Fuzzy Panda short report.” The article stated that New Era Energy & Digital stock “tumbled” after “short seller Fuzzy Panda Research released a scathing report targeting the company.” Further, the article stated that Fuzzy Panda’s short report, “titled ‘NUAI: Serial Penny Stock CEO Combined Bad Gas Assets, Paid Stock Promo, Renamed Co & Added ’AI’,’ alleges that the company spent 2.5 times more on stock promotions than on operating its oil and gas wells. Fuzzy Panda claims CEO E. Will Gray II has a history of running penny stock companies “into the ground” over approximately 20 years.”
On this news, New Era Energy & Digital’s stock fell 6.9% on December 12, 2025.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:221mo ago
Small-Cap vs. Mega-Cap: Is IWO or MGK the Better Buy Right Now?
IWO charges a higher expense ratio but offers a slightly greater dividend yield than MGK. MGK has delivered stronger five-year growth and shallower drawdowns, while IWO brings broader diversification across small-cap growth stocks.
Memory chips are becoming the new bottleneck in AI development.
For the last three years, discussions around artificial intelligence (AI) chips have mainly revolved around Nvidia (NVDA +7.87%). Nvidia's Hopper, Blackwell, and upcoming Rubin graphics processing unit (GPU) architectures serve as a core hardware foundation on which generative AI applications are designed.
But over the last several months, another semiconductor stock has come into focus. Let's dig into why Wall Street's new favorite AI chip stock is Micron Technology (MU +3.17%), and explore why the company could be following in Nvidia's footsteps.
Image source: Micron Technology.
What does Micron do? There are several layers to the AI chip value chain. GPUs from Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices are general-purpose, versatile pieces of hardware. They are capable of processing large datasets at high speeds, making AI application development more efficient.
On the other hand, Broadcom specializes in custom application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Custom silicon is currently leveraged by hyperscalers such as Alphabet and Meta Platforms for specific workloads across deep learning or specialized inference needs.
According to Bloomberg Intelligence, the total addressable market (TAM) for AI accelerators is expected to grow at a 16% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) through 2033, reaching a size of $604 billion. These trends serve as a powerful secular tailwind for Micron.
As AI workloads scale and become more complex, an adjacent pocket of the chip realm that expands alongside GPUs and ASICs is memory and storage. Micron is a dominant player in high-bandwidth memory (HBM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), and NAND chips.
In 2025, Micron's TAM was estimated to be just $35 billion. However, the company's management is forecasting the memory market to grow to $100 billion by 2028.
The subtle takeaway here is that demand for memory chips is accelerating at a much faster pace than the GPU market -- suggesting that Micron's chip solutions are poised for explosive growth in the coming years.
Today's Change
(
3.17
%) $
12.13
Current Price
$
395.02
Why is memory so expensive right now? The primary reason memory and storage chips have become so expensive is due to rising capital expenditure (capex) budgets from the hyperscalers. Just this year alone, big tech is expected to spend more than $500 billion on AI infrastructure.
These spending patterns have fueled massive shortages in HBM solutions specifically. Industry research from TrendForce suggests that prices for DRAM and NAND chips could soar by as much as 60% and 38%, respectively, in the first quarter alone.
Is Micron stock a buy? Over the last year, shares of Micron have gone parabolic, rising 348%. Given that level of momentum, some may think it's too late to buy the newest chip darling. Smart investors understand that looking at a stock price in isolation reveals little when it comes to valuation, though.
MU PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.
Currently, Micron trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 12. As the chart above illustrates, Micron trades at a steep discount compared to other leaders in the AI chip market.
Given the strong tailwinds fueling a multi-year supercycle for HBM chips, in combination with an attractive valuation profile, I see Micron stock as a no-brainer.
While it may not experience a run-up like Nvidia's, I do think Micron's critical role in the memory market parallels that of Nvidia's early days in the AI revolution. For this reason, I think Micron could reasonably be seen as a "new Nvidia."
Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Micron Technology, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:311mo ago
ITGR DEADLINE TOMORROW: ROSEN, A LONGSTANDING LAW FIRM, Encourages Integer Holdings Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important February 9 Deadline in Securities Class Action - ITGR
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 8, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) between July 25, 2024 and October 22, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important February 9, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Integer common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Integer class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=49170 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 9, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Integer materially overstated its competitive position within the growing electrophysiology ("EP") manufacturing market; (2) despite Integer's claims of strong visibility into customer demand, Integer was experiencing a sustained deterioration in sales relating to two of its EP devices; (3) in turn, Integer mischaracterized its EP devices as a long-term growth driver for its cardio and vascular ("C&V") segment; (4) as a result of the above, defendants' positive statements about Integer's business, and operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Integer class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=49170 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/283007
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Contact Us
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 18:461mo ago
Rosen Law Firm Encourages Lakeland Industries, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - LAKE
Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Lakeland Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: LAKE) resulting from allegations that Lakeland may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.
So What: If you purchased Lakeland securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.
What to do next: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50020 https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=39889 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
What is this about: On December 9, 2025, Lakeland Industries issued a press release entitled "Lakeland Fire + Safety Reports Fiscal Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results." In this press release, Lakeland announced that it was withdrawing its previously issued financial guidance for the 2026 fiscal year and that it would "not be providing financial guidance going forward."
On this news, Lakeland stock fell 38.97% on December 10, 2025.
Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.
2026-02-09 00:021mo ago
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
Fangzhou Wins Tencent Health ‘AI-Powered Future Award' as MaaS Platform Drives AI Chronic Care
SHANGHAI, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fangzhou Inc. (“Fangzhou” or the “Company”) (HKEX: 06086), a leader in AI-driven Internet healthcare solutions, has won the “AI-Powered Future Award” at a high-level industry forum hosted by Tencent Health, underscoring its pioneering efforts in the field of “AI + Chronic Disease Services” and its strong leadership in the digital transformation of the healthcare sector.
The award was presented at the “T-Inspire CIO Private Forum,” organized by Tencent Health to convene senior executives and technology leaders from across the life sciences, pharmaceutical manufacturing and healthcare technology sectors.
Fangzhou Wins Tencent Health “AI-Powered Future Award”
As one of China’s leading “AI-enabled chronic care” platforms, Fangzhou has positioned technology as a core growth driver. In 2025, the Company completed a strategic upgrade of its H2H (Hospital-to-Home) model into an “AI + H2H” smart healthcare ecosystem. The model is built on long-term, trust-based doctor–patient relationships, which the company views as a key differentiator in chronic disease management.
Alongside this upgrade, Fangzhou has expanded its MaaS (Medicine as a Service) framework, integrating its solid foundation of patient trust with robust service delivery capabilities, translating “patient-centric care” into actionable, closed-loop, and scalable chronic disease management solutions. By doing so, Fangzhou is spearheading the industry’s transition from traditional pharmaceutical distribution to an intelligent healthcare service system. This shift marks a qualitative leap for chronic disease care — evolving from a reactive, one-way response model into a proactive, interactive, and collaborative partnership between patients and healthcare providers.
The Company’s collaboration with Tencent Health has played a central role in this process. Fangzhou contributes deep domain knowledge and real-world insights from chronic care scenarios, while Tencent provides cloud computing, data and AI infrastructure. Together, the partners have established a closed loop from technology validation to large-scale deployment, offering a replicable blueprint for intelligent chronic care service.
Fangzhou said its AI-driven model has helped overcome traditional constraints of time and geography in healthcare delivery, expanding post-hospital care coverage while improving service efficiency through algorithm-driven workflows. These capabilities have supported sustained growth in user engagement and platform activity, reflecting strong user retention and long-term service value.
The award comes against the backdrop of the Company’s improved financial performance. The company recently issued a positive profit alert with forecasted 2025 revenue of RMB 3.5 billion to RMB 3.55 billion, representing ~30% year-on-year growth, highlighting the strong performance of its chronic care model.
Looking ahead, Fangzhou will continue to strengthen its MaaS system, deepen AI integration across chronic disease services, and broaden access to professional, technology-enabled care while reinforcing its position as a key player in the country’s healthcare digitization drive.
About Fangzhou Inc.
Fangzhou Inc. (HKEX: 06086) is China’s leading online chronic disease management platform, serving 52.8 million registered users and 229,000 physicians (as of June 30, 2025). The Company specializes in delivering tailored medical care and AI-enabled precision medicine solutions. For more information, visit https://investors.jianke.com.
Media Contact
For further inquiries or interviews, please reach out to:
Xingwei Zhao Associate Director of Public Relations Email: [email protected]
Disclaimer: This press release contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/87935ce9-eea5-456f-bb01-a06951749c93
2026-02-08 23:011mo ago
2026-02-08 17:001mo ago
Bitcoin vs Gold – Cathie Wood thinks THIS is why institutions are betting on both!
For months, investors have debated whether Bitcoin [BTC] or gold is the better store of value. Even now, the debate is showing no sign of fading. Especially given the significant volatility across both price charts.
From a price perspective, Bitcoin has begun to recover somewhat after recent bouts of depreciation though.
At press time, BTC was trading at $70,681, up 3.03% in the last 24 hours. This may be a sign that investors are once again buying the dip, keeping the “digital gold” narrative alive.
On the other hand, gold has also exhibited strength, with its price rising by 2.03% to $4,966.26 per ounce, nearing the $5,000-mark. This appeared to be indicative of strong demand for traditional safe-haven assets.
That’s not all though as the Bitcoin vs gold debate is being reshaped by AI and institutional adoption too.
ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood on Bitcoin vs Gold According to Cathie Wood of ARK Invest, “agentic commerce,” where AI systems transact autonomously, is turning blockchains like Bitcoin, Ethereum [ETH], and Solana [SOL] into core financial infrastructure.
As a result, investors are increasingly focusing on these leading networks, with Bitcoin now viewed as a central part of modern portfolios rather than just a speculative asset.
Expressing the same, Wood added,
“Bitcoin is leading the way. It is the most secure of all the crypto.”
Factors causing Bitcoin’s decline While rising Japanese interest rates, tighter U.S liquidity, and portfolio rebalancing are pressuring crypto markets, they reflect Bitcoin’s growing role in global finance rather than its decline.
In fact, the exec went on to say that the current volatility is largely driven by shifting global capital flows.
Slow growth in China and easing inflation fears have been weakening gold’s momentum, potentially redirecting capital towards Bitcoin. Thanks to the same, this asset class might now be entering a new transition phase beyond competition with AI stocks.
Importantly though, the relationship between Bitcoin and gold is also evolving.
Gold and Bitcoin seem to go hand in hand Gold remains the trusted hedge in times of crisis and uncertainty, while Bitcoin is emerging as its digital counterpart, offering similar protection along with greater growth potential and programmability.
Remarking on the same, Wood noted,
“We wouldn’t be surprised if gold continued to come down to Bitcoin’s benefit.”
She added,
“Gold precedes a big move in Bitcoin”
Her statement implied that gold’s price action can act as a leading signal for Bitcoin’s next major move. In fact, according to Wood’s analysis, institutions are increasingly pairing both assets, gold for stability and safety, and Bitcoin for innovation and upside.
Together, they form a powerful hedge, shifting the question from “gold or Bitcoin” to “how much of each?”
Are Bitcoin market dynamics concerning? At the time of writing, Bitcoin’s long-term outlook looked strong. However, short-term signals seemed mixed.
On-chain data from Glassnode underlined a decline in active users – A sign of weak retail participation.
Source: Glassnode
At the same time, Bitcoin’s market dominance climbed to around 59%, indicating that investors may be moving away from risky altcoins and back into Bitcoin.Finally, Wood again reiterated that Bitcoin’s traditional four-year cycle of sharp rallies and deep crashes is now breaking. This statement came on the back of her words on CNBC when she claimed that the prevailing downturn may be the mildest in its history.
Final Thoughts Institutional adoption is reducing extreme volatility and reshaping Bitcoin’s long-term market structure. Global pressures such as rising Japanese rates and tighter U.S. liquidity reflect Bitcoin’s growing role in global finance.
2026-02-08 23:011mo ago
2026-02-08 17:151mo ago
Address poisoning attacks continue to plague the Ethereum ecosystem
Address poisoning attacks have become a persistent issue on Ethereum, and ironically, they have contributed to the recent record-breaking daily transaction counts.
According to ScamSniffer, there has already been a victim of address poisoning this year, and that loss cost $12.25 million. It happened in January when the victim copied the wrong address from their transaction history, not noticing until it was too late.
A similar story emerged in December when one user lost a whopping $50 million in the same way. That makes it two victims across two months with a total loss of $62 million.
According to a ScamSniffer’s January report, signature phishing also went up, with a total of $6.27M stolen across 4,741 victims in January. The two cases involved a user losing $3.02M and another losing $1.08M and accounted for 65% of all phishing losses.
Why address poisoning attacks have become rampant in recent months Address poisoning is a kind of scam that depends heavily on social engineering, where attackers monitor the target’s transaction histories, create lookalike addresses, and then send tiny amounts of ETH, called dust transactions, effectively poisoning the target’s history.
What follows is a waiting game until the victim makes a mistake. The most important part of the whole operation, the dust transactions, were too expensive on Ethereum, so those address poisoning attacks were never as common before now.
However, in late 2025, Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade came through, and it improved scalability while reducing the transaction fees, causing gas costs to drop sharply. The upgrade has done many great things for the ecosystem, but it also made these low-value dust transactions economically viable for bad actors at scale for the first time.
Address poisoning contributes to daily transaction record on Ethereum As earlier stated, address poisoning attacks depend heavily on dust transactions that the attackers send to poison the target’s history.
These dust transactions are a prerequisite to the attack itself and are often numerous, and they are set like traps. But not all of them catch prey. Nevertheless, these dust transfers count as real transactions on-chain, and they have been inflating Ethereum’s metrics.
Ethereum daily transaction chart. Source: Etherscan After the Fusaka upgrade, the network saw massive surges in activity that lasted into 2026. Daily transactions hit all-time highs, and active/new addresses spiked dramatically.
However, analysts and researchers have pointed out that a substantial portion of the surge is linked to mass address poisoning campaigns rather than organic adoption or usage.
The fact that the ETH price barely had a bullish reaction to all these new records further justifies talk of artificial inflation. However, the Ethereum maxis are not nitpicking over where the traffic is coming from.
They have celebrated the new records, and the Fusaka upgrade has been widely hailed as a great implementation. Never mind that low-value spam transactions dominated the records or that many of the new active addresses received such qualification because they received tiny stablecoin transfers as their first activity.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:001mo ago
Tom Lee's BitMine Adds Another $42 Million in Ethereum Despite Crypto Winter
Tom Lee’s BitMine Adds Another $42 Million in Ethereum Despite Crypto WinterBitMine, the largest corporate ETH holder, has defied the onset of "Crypto Winter" by purchasing an additional $42 million in Ethereum.The firm's chair Tom Lee defends the volatility as a standard cycle feature and maintains that "Ethereum is the future of finance."To offset the valuation drag, the company is diversifying its accumulation strategy with massive Ethereum staking yields.BitMine, the largest corporate holder of Ethereum, has capitalized on the digital asset’s recent price volatility to expand its treasury holdings.
On February 7, blockchain analysis platform Lookonchain reported the transaction, citing data from Arkham Intelligence. The firm acquired approximately 20,000 ETH for a total capital outlay of $41.98 million.
Sponsored
Sponsored
BitMine Chair Defends Aggressive Buying Amid CrashNotably, this latest tranche moves the firm significantly closer to its long-term objective of controlling 5% of Ethereum’s total circulating supply. Data from Strategic ETH Reserve shows it has achieved over 70% of that goal with its 4.29 million ETH holdings.
Meanwhile, BitMine’s latest ETH purchase comes at a moment of extreme market fragility.
Ethereum prices have collapsed roughly 31% over the past 30 days, trading around $2,117 as of press time. Over the past week, the asset traded for as low as $1,824, its lowest level since May 2025.
Still, BitMine remain committed to the crypto token, with the firm’s chairman Tom Lee arguing that “Ethereum is the future of finance.”
Consequently, Lee has dismissed concerns regarding the firm’s deepening unrealized losses.
Sponsored
Sponsored
In a recent statement, Lee argued that the current volatility is “a feature, not a bug.” According to him, Ethereum has weathered drawdowns of 60% or worse on seven occasions since 2018.
So, despite the “Crypto Winter” optics exacerbated by the nomination of Kevin Warsh to the Federal Reserve and geopolitical tensions following the Greenland incident, the Ethereum network’s fundamental usage remains robust.
Moreover, BitMine has been evolving beyond a simple “buy-and-hold” treasury strategy.
To outperform the cycle and mitigate the drag of falling spot prices, the company is pivoting toward what it describes as “accretive acquisitions” and high-risk capital deployment.
This includes publicized “moonshot” allocations into smaller-cap tokens like Orbs and investments in media outlets like Mr Beast.
Additionally, BitMine continues to leverage its massive stack for yield, staking nearly 3 million ETH.
These efforts are designed to offset the heavy pressure of a macro environment that has turned sharply risk-off.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:001mo ago
Bitcoin's road to recovery – Odds on price hitting $83K in the short-term are
Bitcoin’s price has been holding steady around $68k-$70k since dipping to $60k, following which it surged by 13%.
What’s even more bullish, however, according to liquidations heatmap data, is that a breakout above $80,500 could trigger $5.7 billion in short liquidations – Marking an important milestone in its price action.
Source: CoinGlass
While the cryptocurrency is still well away from its ATHs from 2025, this 13% bounceback can be seen as evidence of resilience. However, the market’s fragility does raise some questions too.
Is something big building for Bitcoin?
Will Bitcoin miners re-enter the market if prices stabilize? Bitcoin’s mining difficulty adjustment on 08 February 2026, was the largest negative change since China’s 2021 mining ban. Historically, negative adjustments signal a retreat of miners, driven by plummeting profitability.
Source: X
And yet, a drop in difficulty also means that mining becomes easier and cheaper, inviting the possibility of miners returning if Bitcoin’s price stabilizes. Hence, the real question is – Can the price hold steady above the $60k-range, and what could support Bitcoin in maintaining this level?
Whale’s $106.7M BTC withdrawal signals bullish market sentiment A move tracked by on-chain analysts at Lookonchain caught attention on 08 February. A whale withdrew 1,546 BTC, valued at $106.7M, from Binance. This massive transaction wasn’t a quick sell-off either. Instead, it indicated long-term confidence.
Source: Lookonchain
Whales typically don’t move such huge sums to cold storage if they anticipate further declines. Instead, it pointed to the belief that Bitcoin’s bottom had been tested and that a bullish shift could be on the horizon. Was this the moment the market had been waiting for though?
Search interest hits 12-month high!
Source: Google Trends
After Bitcoin’s drop from $81,500 to $60,000, Google Trends saw a spike in searches, with the same hitting a 12-month high. This surge in interest raised questions about whether it marked a turning point or if it was an overreaction. It also implied that many traders are still on the fence about what to expect from the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
Break $83k or drop to $49k? Bitcoin’s rally has recovered by over $10,000 since its low and now, it is at a critical crossroads. The $83k-level looms as the next major resistance level that Bitcoin must break.
Source: TradingView
A break above these $80k levels could trigger massive short liquidations, sparking a potential rally.
On the other hand, failure to break this level could push Bitcoin back to the $49k-$53k range. This range is where it found support in 2024. Whales may be betting on a breakout, but whether the market follows this momentum remains uncertain right now.
Final Thoughts Bitcoin’s recovery above $60k demonstrates resilience, but its path forward hinges on breaking the critical resistance at $83k.
Both whale activity and market sentiment hinted at a potential bullish reversal.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:011mo ago
CoinShares Says Quantum Computers Need 100,000x More Power to Crack Bitcoin
CoinShares just dropped a bombshell. The digital asset manager claims quantum computers would need to get 100,000 times more powerful before they could actually break Bitcoin’s security.
That’s a pretty massive leap in computing power we’re talking about here. The report came out today and basically says all the worry about quantum computers destroying Bitcoin is way overblown. Marcus Swanepoel, who runs CoinShares, thinks it’ll take at least a decade before quantum tech gets scary enough to threaten Bitcoin. And even then, only about 10,200 BTC would actually be at risk – that’s basically nothing compared to the 19 million Bitcoin floating around out there.
Quantum computing sounds terrifying. But it’s not there yet.
The whole quantum threat thing has been buzzing around crypto circles for months now. People keep asking if these super-fast quantum machines will crack Bitcoin’s encryption and send everything crashing down. CoinShares did the math and found that current quantum computers can’t even come close to breaking Bitcoin’s cryptographic shields. The computational power gap is just too huge right now.
Bitcoin’s security relies on mathematical problems that regular computers can’t solve in any reasonable timeframe. We’re talking about calculations that would take classical computers longer than the age of the universe to crack. Quantum computers work differently – they can theoretically process certain types of calculations much faster. But “theoretically” is the key word here.
Industry folks are split on this. Some think the quantum threat is total nonsense, while others want everyone to start panicking and building quantum-resistant systems right now. The truth probably sits somewhere in the middle, and CoinShares seems to be taking that balanced approach.
IBM’s throwing a quantum conference on February 15th where they’ll talk about all this stuff. Their Quantum Experience program has been letting researchers play around with actual quantum processors, but these machines are still pretty weak compared to what you’d need to threaten Bitcoin. Professor Scott Aaronson from MIT’s Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems said current quantum machines don’t have the qubit stability needed to crack Bitcoin’s cryptography.
So what’s the real timeline here? CoinShares thinks we’re looking at ten years minimum before quantum computers get powerful enough to pose a real threat. That matches up with what most quantum researchers are saying about the pace of development in this field.
The European Union is pouring €1 billion into quantum research through something called the Quantum Flagship initiative. Started in 2018, it’s supposed to run for ten years and speed up quantum development across Europe. But Dr. Thomas Monz from the University of Innsbruck, who works on the project, warns that turning theoretical breakthroughs into actual working systems takes way longer than people expect.
Meanwhile, NIST in the US is already working on quantum-resistant encryption standards. They think new standards might be ready by the late 2020s, which would give industries time to prepare. That’s smart planning, even if the threat isn’t immediate.
The crypto community isn’t sitting around waiting either. Developers are already researching quantum-resistant algorithms that could protect Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies if quantum computers do eventually get powerful enough. It’s basically an insurance policy for the future.
But here’s the thing – no quantum computer exists today that can challenge Bitcoin’s security. Not even close. The machines researchers are building now are impressive for scientific purposes, but they’re nowhere near the scale needed to break modern encryption. The cost and complexity barriers are massive.
CoinShares didn’t say exactly what they might do if quantum computers do become a real threat. They’re probably keeping their cards close to their chest on that one. But the report makes it clear they think the crypto industry has plenty of time to adapt and build better defenses.
The quantum computing field moves fast, but not that fast. Building stable quantum systems with enough qubits to threaten Bitcoin is an engineering challenge that could take decades to solve. And by then, Bitcoin’s encryption will probably have evolved too.
Right now, quantum computers are more science experiment than existential threat. The 100,000x power increase CoinShares talks about isn’t happening anytime soon.
China has committed $15 billion to quantum computing research over the next five years, while Google’s quantum team achieved “quantum supremacy” in 2019 with their 53-qubit Sycamore processor. However, cryptography experts note that breaking Bitcoin would require millions of stable qubits working together flawlessly.
The Bitcoin network processes about 300,000 transactions daily, each protected by the same cryptographic methods CoinShares analyzed. Major exchanges like Coinbase and Binance have started forming quantum advisory committees to monitor developments, though most conclude the risk remains theoretical for now.
XRP surprised this weekend with a sudden surge of +2,860 % on its spot flows in barely eight hours. This historic peak, occurring in a quiet market, reignites speculation about a possible cycle change. While some see it as a simple technical rebound, others detect a precursor signal. In any case, this volatility spike breaks the stupor that had surrounded crypto for several weeks.
In brief XRP recorded a record increase of +2,860 % on its spot flows in only eight hours. This peak occurred in an overall subdued market, rekindling speculation about a possible cycle change. The volume explosion is linked to a technical rebound, with XRP exiting an extreme oversold zone. Despite this spectacular surge, fundamentals remain fragile with a continued volume decline on the XRP Ledger. A record inflow on XRP spot flows In the past hours, XRP recorded a spectacular surge in its spot flows, with a +2,860 % increase in just eight hours, an absolute record for this asset, while the crypto is still below $2.
This statistic is interpreted as a sign of a marked return of risk appetite in an still quiet market. Such a movement stands out by both its brutality and timing, occurring while the entire crypto market remained lethargic.
In this context, the observed surge in XRP resembles a volatility spike breaking with the slow erosion of recent weeks. However, despite its intensity, this signal remains too isolated to be considered the start of a true cycle reversal.
According to available data, this renewed activity appears mainly linked to a specific technical setup: XRP had just exited an extreme oversold zone, often seen as conducive to a rebound.
Several factors converge to explain this sudden reactivation of spot flows :
An extremely oversold technical level was reached, attracting traders looking for a quick rebound ; The sudden volume acceleration triggered a domino effect in spot markets ; The weekend’s low liquidity context amplified movements, allowing a moderate volume to have an outsized impact on price ; The absence of new fundamental data at the time of the peak supports the idea of a purely technical reaction rather than one motivated by project or network developments. These elements converge to the hypothesis of a mainly speculative impulse, supported by temporarily favorable market conditions.
Ambiguous technical signals While the spot flow peak indicates a short-term surge of interest, XRP network fundamentals do not seem to follow the same dynamic.
Indeed, the on-chain data remain mixed. The payment volume on the XRP Ledger continues to decline, suggesting that the current activity is more a result of speculative moves than increased adoption of the XRP infrastructure. This contrast between the surge in market flows and the drop in network usage is a signal to consider to avoid overly optimistic interpretations.
Another element to consider is the timing of this surge. The peak occurred over the weekend, a generally less liquid period and thus more vulnerable to sharp moves. This setup makes any premature projection risky, especially in the absence of confirmation at the open of weekday markets.
The sudden peak in spot flows alone is not enough to confirm a lasting reversal. Despite this surge in activity, the XRP price remains dependent on weak fundamentals and an uncertain market. Only a sustained recovery in volumes and usage can validate a real trend change.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Luc Jose A.
Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019. Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:071mo ago
Bitcoin News: Market Veteran Peter Brandt Says BTC Dips Are Normal—When to Expect a Rebound
The current BTC pullback has sparked fresh debate across the market, yet veteran market participant Peter Brandt argues that the move is less alarming than it appears. Instead of signaling a structural breakdown, he suggests the decline mirrors patterns observed throughout Bitcoin’s history.
After several days of weakness, BTC has formed a series of lower highs and lower lows, a pattern often associated with sustained selling pressure. Even so, Brandt noted that this type of action is common during broader market cycles and should not automatically be viewed as the start of a prolonged downturn.
Brandt Says Current Bitcoin Dip Fits Historical Cycle Patterns In a recent post on X, Brandt explained that the latest slide resembles what he describes as “campaign selling” rather than retail panic. In these phases, larger market participants gradually reduce exposure, creating steady pressure instead of sharp, chaotic drops.
As a result, prices tend to drift lower in a controlled structure. According to Brandt, this process often flushes out overleveraged positions and short-term holders before long-term participants begin rebuilding positions. Historically, similar setups have been followed by reaccumulation periods. Once that stage completes, Bitcoin has frequently transitioned into renewed upward momentum.
Despite the uncertainty, longer-term projections remain focused on historical templates. In previous cycles, Bitcoin experienced multiple corrections of significant magnitude before continuing its primary trend.
Sentiment Mixed as Analysts Watch Key $65,000 Zone Broader sentiment remains divided as volatility persists. Some observers caution that tighter liquidity or macro pressures could drag BTC toward deeper support levels. For instance, Michael Burry recently suggested Bitcoin could face additional pressure below $58,000, a view that has added to near-term caution.
Meanwhile, market analyst Ted Pillows pointed to a large liquidity cluster between $65,000 and $70,000, calling it a critical area to monitor. If buyers step in around this band, Bitcoin could stabilize and attempt a rebound. Conversely, failure to hold these levels may invite further downside.
Diversification in Emerging Ecosystems: Minotaurus (MTAUR) While the primary market faces volatility, some participants are focusing on emerging projects like Minotaurus (MTAUR). The project is attracting attention due to its focus on the blockchain-integrated gaming sector, a niche that often shows independent momentum during broader market corrections.
MTAUR powers the Minotaurus ecosystem, a Binance Smart Chain (BNB Chain) based platform. The token allows users to interact with in-game mechanics, customize avatars, and access incentives within its gaming environment. Currently priced at 0.00012659 USDT, the token serves as the functional medium of exchange for the platform’s mobile gaming offerings.
Project Utility and Early Incentives Minotaurus aims to combine blockchain technology with casual gaming mechanics. The project has structured its ecosystem to prioritize utility, offering features such as referral incentives and specific vesting periods that provide additional tokens to participants.
Additionally, the project is conducting a 100,000 USDT giveaway to encourage community engagement. With over 3 million USDT secured in its initial phases, the project is positioning itself as a utility-oriented alternative for those looking to diversify beyond large-cap assets like Bitcoin during periods of high volatility.
For more information
official website.
The information presented in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Crypto Economy is not affiliated with the project. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile and can involve significant risks. We recommend that you conduct your own analysis.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:071mo ago
Falcon Finance (FF) 2026–2032 Price Prediction: Why This DeFi Token Could Outperform the Market?
Market Outlook 2026–2032: Falcon Finance faces a volatile but promising trajectory, with forecasts ranging from near‑zero lows to multi‑dollar highs. Key Drivers: Adoption trends, liquidity growth, and investor sentiment remain the most influential factors. Analysts emphasize that FF’s ability to sustain momentum depends on broader DeFi utility. Investor Takeaway: The six‑year window is pivotal, offering both high‑risk volatility and opportunities for long‑term consolidation. For investors, FF represents a speculative yet potentially rewarding asset.
Falcon Finance has emerged as one of the more ambitious entrants in the decentralized finance landscape, positioning itself as a protocol designed to streamline lending, yield optimization, and cross‑chain liquidity flows. Built with a focus on automation and capital efficiency, the project aims to reduce the complexity typically associated with DeFi participation, offering users a simplified gateway into strategies that traditionally require advanced technical knowledge. Its architecture emphasizes modularity and interoperability, allowing the protocol to evolve alongside broader market trends and integrate new financial primitives as the ecosystem matures.
The Role of the Falcon Token At the center of this framework is the FF token, a utility asset that powers governance, incentivizes liquidity, and supports the protocol’s reward mechanisms. The token’s role extends beyond simple transactional use; it functions as a core component of the system’s economic alignment, ensuring that participants who contribute to network growth and stability are directly rewarded. As adoption increases and more value circulates through the protocol, the token’s relevance within the ecosystem becomes increasingly tied to real usage rather than speculative interest alone.
Positioning Falcon Finance Within the Next Market Cycle These fundamentals set the stage for a deeper examination of Falcon Finance’s long‑term valuation prospects. With the crypto market entering a new cycle defined by institutional participation, regulatory clarity, and expanding DeFi utility, the period from 2026 to 2032 represents a critical window for assessing the project’s potential trajectory. This price prediction analysis explores how technological development, market sentiment, token utility, and macroeconomic conditions could shape Falcon Finance’s performance over the next several years, offering a structured outlook for investors and analysts tracking its evolution.
2026: Early Cycle Signals and Market Setup The 2026 outlook for Falcon Finance presents a wide yet compelling trading range, with CoinCodex projecting that FF could fluctuate between $0.05344 and $0.2132 throughout the year. This channel supports an estimated average annual price of $0.08133, a level that implies a potential 178.40% return on investment if market conditions align with historical volatility patterns.
Additional forecasts introduce an even broader performance spectrum, suggesting that FF could climb as high as $0.5523 during a strong upward trend. However, analysts also caution that a loss of momentum could push the token toward $0.001189, underscoring the volatility that often accompanies developing ecosystems.
Youtubers Prediction for FF
Crypto With James, the popular YouTube Channel, shared a video reviewing Falcon Finance and discussing the token’s potential to reach $1 some time in 2026.
2027: Shifting Momentum and Utility Expansion
According to CoinDataFlow’s latest experimental simulation, their model suggests that Falcon Finance could decline by ‑27.66%, reaching approximately $0.055254 even under favorable conditions. Throughout the year, FF is expected to fluctuate within a range of $0.055254 to $0.018935, highlighting the token’s sensitivity to liquidity cycles and broader DeFi market dynamics.
Other analyses widen the potential trading spectrum considerably, estimating that FF could fall to $0.0004448 in a bearish scenario or climb to $0.4563 if momentum strengthens. This broad range reflects the uncertainty surrounding emerging DeFi assets and the challenges of forecasting performance in rapidly evolving ecosystems.
2028: Adoption Trends and Network Strengthening By 2028, analysts from DigitalCoinPrice anticipate that Falcon Finance will begin the year at $0.0983 and trade near $0.18, a level considered significantly higher compared to the previous year’s performance. This projection represents a notable and acceptable jump for FF, signaling growing confidence in the token’s utility and market presence.
Further estimates expand the trading outlook, with FF expected to move within a wide range between $0.001212 and $0.7619 throughout 2028. Under a bullish scenario, the token could reach a closing price of $0.3664, which underscores the potential for significant upside if momentum holds.
2029: Liquidity Growth and Ecosystem Maturity
In 2029, Falcon Finance is projected to trade within a channel ranging from $0.07520 to $0.1304, resulting in an average annualized price of approximately $0.09930. This level suggests a potential return on investment of 68.95%, reflecting moderate growth compared to earlier cycles. The forecast highlights how FF could benefit from steady adoption and improved liquidity.
Other experts point to a much wider spectrum of possible outcomes, with FF potentially surging to $1.09 in a strong bullish trend or dropping to $0.0002367 if momentum fades. The expected closing price of $0.6829 for 2029 suggests that holding the asset during favorable conditions could prove rewarding. This dual outlook underscores both the upside potential and downside risk that define FF’s trajectory.
2030: Long‑Term Catalysts Begin to Converge By 2030, experimental simulations suggest that Falcon Finance could experience a substantial rise in value, with projections indicating a potential increase of 258.71%. Under the most favorable conditions, FF may reach $0.276077, while the broader forecast places its trading range between $0.276077 and $0.060339 throughout the year. This outlook highlights the possibility of strong upward momentum.
Crypto Analysts expand the potential trading spectrum considerably, estimating that FF could fall to $0.0006957 in a bearish environment or climb as high as $1.42 during a strong bullish trend. Market sentiment models project an average trading price of $1.09 for 2030, underscoring the potential for significant appreciation if adoption and liquidity continue to strengthen.
2031: Stabilization Phase and Value Consolidation
Analysts project that Falcon Finance could cross the $0.38 threshold, supported by technical analysis and broader market sentiment. Forecasts suggest that FF may trade within a minimum of $0.34 and a maximum of $0.43 during the year, reflecting a relatively narrow but stable band compared to prior cycles. This range indicates a potential consolidation phase.
Complementary simulations provide an alternative outlook, estimating that FF’s price could grow by 128.77% under ideal conditions, potentially reaching $0.176069. However, the token is also expected to fluctuate between $0.176069 and $0.073774 throughout 2031, underscoring the volatility that remains inherent in emerging digital assets.
2032: Strategic Outlook for the Next Market Era Based on the latest experimental simulations, Falcon Finance could experience a remarkable surge in 2032, with projections indicating a potential rise of 356.17%. Under the most optimistic scenario, FF may reach $0.351085, while the broader forecast places its trading range between $0.351085 and $0.108226 throughout the year. This outlook highlights the possibility of sustained growth.
Further technical analysis anticipates that by the beginning of 2032, the price of FF will reach $0.35, with expectations that it will maintain this level by year’s end. Additional forecasts suggest that FF could also trade up to $0.29, reinforcing the view that the period from 2026 to 2032 represents a critical window for the token’s expansion.
Conclusion Falcon Finance’s trajectory from 2026 to 2032 highlights both volatility and opportunity, with forecasts ranging from sharp declines to significant surges. Analysts emphasize adoption, liquidity, and sentiment as key drivers. This period represents a decisive window where FF could consolidate value, expand utility, and establish long‑term relevance in DeFi markets.
The Price Predictions published in this article are based on estimates made by industry professionals; they are not investment recommendations, and it should be understood that these predictions may not occur as described.
The content of this article should only be taken as a guide, and you should always carry out your own analysis before making any investment.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:131mo ago
Risks Rise for Bitcoin, Gold, and Silver as Goldman Sachs Warns $80 Billion in Stock Selling
Risks Rise for Bitcoin, Gold, and Silver as Goldman Sachs Warns $80 Billion in Stock SellingGoldman flags CTA-driven selling that could unload $80 billion in equities within weeks.Thinning liquidity and short-gamma positioning risk amplifying volatility across markets.Bitcoin, gold, and silver face spillover risks as equity deleveraging accelerates.Global markets may be entering a new phase of volatility after Goldman Sachs warned that systematic funds could offload tens of billions of dollars in equities in the coming weeks.
This wave of selling could ripple into Bitcoin, gold, and silver as liquidity conditions deteriorate.
Sponsored
Goldman Warns CTA Selling Could Accelerate as Liquidity ThinsAccording to Goldman’s trading desk, trend-following funds known as Commodity Trading Advisers (CTAs) have already triggered sell signals in the S&P 500. What’s more, they are expected to remain net sellers in the near term, regardless of whether markets stabilize or continue falling.
STOCK SELL-OFF NOT OVER, GOLDMAN TRADERS SAY
Goldman Sachs warns that US stocks could face more selling this week, driven by trend-following funds known as CTAs, which have already hit sell triggers in the S&P 500.
The bank estimates CTAs could dump up to $33 billion this week…
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) February 8, 2026 The bank estimates that roughly $33 billion in equities could be sold within a week if markets weaken further.
More significantly, Goldman’s models suggest that as much as $80 billion in additional systematic selling could be triggered over the next month if the S&P 500 continues to decline or breaches key technical levels.
Market conditions are already fragile. Goldman analysts noted that liquidity has deteriorated and options positioning has shifted in ways that may amplify price swings.
When dealers are positioned “short gamma,” they are often forced to sell into falling markets and buy into rising ones, intensifying volatility and accelerating intraday moves.
Sponsored
The Short Gamma flip below 6,900 is the real story here. It’s why every 1% dip feels like 3%. When the dealers are forced to seLL into a faLLing market to hedge their b00ks, fundamentals like 'record earnings' don't maTTer. We’re in a 'GaMMa Trap' until we can reclaim 7,000 and…
— ur-trading (@urtrading) February 8, 2026 Goldman also highlighted those other systematic strategies—including risk-parity and volatility-control funds—still have room to reduce exposure if volatility continues to rise. That means selling pressure may not be limited to CTAs alone.
Investor sentiment is also showing signs of strain. Goldman’s internal Panic Index recently approached levels associated with extreme stress.
Goldman Sachs Panic Index. Source: Goldman SachsMeanwhile, retail investors, after a year of aggressively buying dips, are beginning to show fatigue. Recent flows indicate net selling rather than buying.
Sponsored
Although Goldman’s analysis focused primarily on equities, the implications extend beyond stock markets.
Historically, large, flow-driven equity sell-offs and tightening liquidity conditions have increased volatility across macro-sensitive assets, including crypto.
Bitcoin, which has increasingly traded in line with broader risk sentiment during periods of liquidity stress, could face renewed volatility if forced selling in equities accelerates.
Crypto-linked equities and retail-favored speculative trades have already shown sensitivity to recent market swings, suggesting positioning remains fragile.
Sponsored
At the same time, turbulence in equities can trigger complex cross-asset flows. While risk-off conditions can pressure commodities, precious metals such as gold and silver can also attract safe-haven demand during periods of heightened uncertainty, leading to sharp moves in either direction depending on broader liquidity trends and the dollar’s strength.
Gold, Bitcoin, and Silver Price Performances. Source: TradingViewIn the meantime, the key variable remains liquidity. With systematic funds deleveraging, volatility rising, and seasonal market weakness approaching, markets may remain unstable in the weeks ahead.
This coming week we will get more selloff in equities, systematic equity players have been deleveraging into Friday.
— 𝗡𝗲𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰 (@Negentropic_) February 8, 2026 If Goldman’s projections materialize, the coming month could test equities, with a spillover effect on Bitcoin and precious metals.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:161mo ago
Bitcoin bears could sleepwalk into a $8.65 billion trap as options max pain expiry nears $90,000
Bitcoin’s next big options gravity well sits on Mar. 27 (260327), and the reason is simple: this is where the market has parked a thick stack of conditional bets that will need to be unwound, rolled forward, or paid out as the clock runs down.
The Mar. 27 expiry carries about $8.65B in notional OI and flags $90,000 as max pain, a rough reference point for where, in aggregate, option holders would feel the most pain at settlement.
The broader options complex is enormous, with total BTC options open interest around $31.99B across exchanges, led by Deribit at roughly $25.56B, with the rest split across CME, OKX, Binance, and Bybit.
Chart showing Bitcoin options open interest from Feb.1 to Feb. 5, 2026 (Source: CoinGlass)That concentration can shape how price behaves on the way there, particularly when liquidity thins and hedging flows start to matter more than anyone wants to admit.
Options can often sound like some kind of private language of institutional traders, which is convenient right up until they start influencing spot price. Our goal here is to translate a crowded derivatives calendar into something legible: where the bets are concentrated, how that concentration can change behavior in spot markets, and why March 27 stands out.
March 27 and the shape of the betsOn Mar. 27 (260327), data shows more calls than puts, roughly 69.85K calls versus 53.25K puts, with puts carrying far more market value than calls in that moment.
Chart showing the open interest for Bitcoin options on Deribit by expiry on Feb. 6, 2026 (Source: CoinGlass)That combination might look strange and even contradictory, until you translate it into everyday incentives.
Calls can be plentiful because they offer defined-risk upside exposure that feels emotionally painless to hold, while puts can be more expensive because downside protection is often bought closer to where it actually hurts, and it tends to get repriced more aggressively when the market is nervous.
The volume data adds a second clue about what was happening at the margin. For the same Mar. 27 expiry, CoinGlass data shows puts around 17.98K versus calls around 10.46K in trading volume, again with puts carrying the heavier market value.
Chart showing the trading volume for Bitcoin options on Deribit by expiry on Feb. 6, 2026 (Source: CoinGlass)That tells us the flow that day leans more toward paying for protection than chasing upside, even while the outstanding inventory still looks call-heavy on count.
Now place that against spot and the broader pile.
March can feel far away in calendar terms, especially when the market is this volatile, but in options terms, it's close enough to exert gravity once nearer expiries finish shuffling positions forward.
When one date holds several billion in notional, it becomes a focal point for rolling, hedging, and all of the other quiet mechanical work market makers do to stay roughly neutral as customers buy and sell convexity. While this doesn't guarantee a particular price, it does increase the odds of price behaving as if there are invisible grooves in the road, because in a derivatives-heavy market, hedging flows can add friction in some ranges and remove it in others.
That brings us to max pain. It's a bookkeeping-style calculation across strikes, not a law of nature and not a trading signal with a motor attached.
It can be a useful reference in the way a median can be useful, as a single marker that tells you something about the distribution, but it's blunt, and blunt tools are almost never the ones moving price.
What tends to matter more is where positions are crowded by strike, because crowding changes how much hedging needs to happen when spot moves. CoinGlass data shows a put/call ratio around 0.44, one more hint that the distribution is lopsided rather than smooth, and lopsided is the whole point because it's how a date stops being a calendar fact and becomes a market event.
There's a simple, non-trader way to hold all of this without turning it into fortune-telling.
As March approaches, crowded strikes can behave like zones where price movement feels oddly damped, then oddly jumpy, because the hedging response is not steady.
If Bitcoin wanders into a heavily populated region, the market’s automatic risk management can reinforce a range, and if Bitcoin moves hard enough to escape it, those same mechanics can flip into something that amplifies momentum instead of resisting it.
What's gamma doing while everyone argues about max painIf options talk has a single word that scares off otherwise capable people, it's gamma, which is unfortunate because the idea is straightforward when you keep it tied to consequences rather than algebra.
Options have deltas, meaning their value changes with price, and gamma describes how quickly that sensitivity changes as price moves.
Dealers who sit on the other side of customer trades often hedge to reduce directional risk, and the practical version is that hedging can turn them into automatic buyers on dips and sellers on rallies near crowded strikes. This is one of the clearest explanations for why price can look magnetized to certain regions.
The reason this matters for a large expiry like Mar. 27 is that hedging intensity isn't constant through time.
As expiry approaches, near-the-money options tend to become more sensitive, and that can make hedging adjustments more frequent and more meaningful in size. That's where the idea of pinning comes from, the observation that price can spend suspiciously long periods hovering near certain strikes as hedgers lean against small moves.
It's often just a risk-control habit showing up in the tape, and it becomes easier to notice when open interest is large and concentrated.
CryptoSlate has covered similar episodes as the options market has matured, emphasizing that expiry effects are most visible when positioning is heavy and clustered, also noting that the calm can disappear after settlement as hedging pressure resets and new positions get rebuilt.
More traditional market reporting often treats max pain as a reference point while focusing attention on how expiry, positioning, and volatility interact.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
The key is that the mechanism itself isn't mystical. A large options stack creates a second layer of trading activity that reacts to spot moves, and sometimes that reactive layer is large enough to be felt by everyone, including people who never touch derivatives.
Options greeks charts, with their stepped shapes, are a visual reminder that sensitivity changes in regimes rather than smoothly. They suggest exposure is concentrated around specific strike regions, so the hedging response can change character as spot crosses those zones.
That's why a single headline number like max pain is usually less informative than a sense of where open interest is thickest, because the thick zones are where hedging flows are most likely to show up as real buying or selling, regardless of what the settlement meme says.
February reshuffles, June anchors, March decidesMar. 27 is the main event in your snapshot, but the supporting beats matter because they help explain how the March setup can change before it arrives.
The same max pain view shows a meaningful late-February expiry, Feb. 27 (260227), at about $6.14B notional with max pain around $85,000.
It also shows notable size further out, including a high concentration at late June (Jun 26, 260626), which serves as a reminder that positioning is not only about the next few weeks, it is also about the market’s longer-dated posture.
February matters because it's close enough to force real decisions.
Traders who don't want positions to expire often roll them, and rolling isn't just a calendar action, it's a change in where exposure sits.
If February positions get rolled into March, the March pile grows heavier, and the gravity well can deepen. If February positions are closed or shifted to different strikes, March can look less crowded than it does today, and the options map will change in a way that has nothing to do with headlines and everything to do with inventory management.
Either way, February is a likely moment for hedges to be adjusted and for the strike distribution to be reshaped, which is why it deserves attention even in a March-focused story.
June matters for a different reason. Far-dated size tends to decay more slowly and can function like an anchor for risk limits, which can affect how aggressively desks manage near-dated risk in March.
The presence of meaningful longer-dated positioning suggests the market is warehousing views about where Bitcoin could be by early summer. That kind of positioning doesn't dictate day-to-day price, but it can influence the tone of the market around March, including how quickly hedges are rolled forward and how much risk dealers are willing to wear.
So the practical takeaway is that the headline numbers aren't the story on their own.
The $8.65B notional on Mar. 27 and the $90,000 max pain marker tell you there's a crowded event on the calendar, but the mechanism worth watching is where the crowd is standing by strike and how hedging pressure behaves as time shrinks.
The path to March runs through February, when positions can be reshuffled, and it stretches toward June, where longer-dated size can shape how the market carries risk.
None of this replaces macro, flows, or fundamentals, and it doesn't need to. It's a layer of explanation for why Bitcoin can look oddly well-behaved.
When the options stack is this large, you can often see the outlines of the next pressure point in advance, as long as you treat max pain as a rough signpost and focus instead on the crowding that can make price feel sticky in one moment and surprisingly slippery in the next.
Mentioned in this articlePosted in
2026-02-08 22:001mo ago
2026-02-08 16:301mo ago
Strategy's Boss Hints at New Bitcoin Accumulation as Unrealized Loss Tops $3.4 Billion
On Sunday, Strategy founder Michael Saylor hinted in a recent X post that his company has likely added to its bitcoin holdings. “Orange Dots Matter,” Saylor said, even as his firm's current bitcoin position sits below its cost basis.
W Token (Wormhole) Gains Momentum as Cross-Chain Infrastructure Becomes the Backbone of Web3As the digital asset market matures, investor attention is increasingly shifting away from short-lived hype cycles and toward foundational infrastructure projects. Among the standout names driving this transition is W Token — the native token of the Wormhole protocol, now available with a 20% bonus - one of the most prominent cross-chain interoperability networks in the blockchain ecosystem.
With multichain applications becoming the new standard, Wormhole is positioning itself at the center of Web3 connectivity.
Powering the Multichain FutureBlockchain ecosystems no longer operate in isolation. Today's decentralized applications are built across Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Avalanche, and numerous emerging networks. The ability to move assets and data seamlessly between these chains is becoming essential — not optional.
Wormhole provides that critical infrastructure.
By enabling secure cross-chain messaging and asset transfers, Wormhole connects dozens of networks and supports a rapidly expanding ecosystem of DeFi platforms, NFT projects, gaming applications, and institutional blockchain initiatives.
As adoption grows, so does the strategic relevance of W Token within the ecosystem.
The Role of W TokenW Token is more than a tradable digital asset — it plays a functional role in the protocol:
• Governance participation in ecosystem decisions
• Staking mechanisms supporting network security
• Incentivization for ecosystem contributors
• Alignment between protocol growth and token holders
As cross-chain activity increases, demand for infrastructure solutions like Wormhole may expand — strengthening the long-term narrative around utility-driven tokens.
Infrastructure Is Where Long-Term Value Is BuiltHistorically, infrastructure layers tend to capture sustained value as markets scale. Just as cloud providers became foundational to Web2, interoperability protocols may serve as core pillars of Web3.
Wormhole has already established itself as a key interoperability provider, facilitating billions in cross-chain volume and forming partnerships across multiple blockchain ecosystems. As developers continue building multichain applications, demand for reliable interoperability could accelerate.
For investors seeking exposure to the structural growth of blockchain technology — rather than isolated applications — infrastructure tokens like W Token present a differentiated thesis.
Why Market Attention Is IncreasingSeveral factors are driving renewed interest in Wormhole and W Token:
1. Rapid expansion of multichain applications
2. Growing institutional focus on interoperability solutions
3. Increasing developer adoption
4. Strengthened ecosystem governance through token participation
As the broader crypto market regains momentum, infrastructure assets are increasingly viewed as foundational plays on long-term industry expansion.
A Strategic Consideration for Forward-Looking InvestorsW Token represents exposure to one of the most critical narratives in blockchain: interoperability. As capital flows back into digital assets, investors are reassessing projects with real utility, established integrations, and scalable technology.
For those evaluating opportunities in the evolving Web3 economy, W Token stands out as a protocol-level asset aligned with the multichain future.
Ready to invest? Purchase W tokens here and receive a 20% bonus from Coinpaper when paying with Solana.
2026-02-08 21:001mo ago
2026-02-08 14:161mo ago
Bitcoin Crashes Below Key Support as Bear Market Deepens
Bitcoin crashed hard. The crypto market’s seeing its worst stretch in months as selling pressure mounts and key technical levels get smashed. Market watchers can’t ignore what’s happening anymore.
CryptoQuant dropped a bombshell report on February 7 that pretty much confirms what traders feared. Bitcoin broke below its 365-day moving average, which is basically the line in the sand between bull and bear territory. The firm’s Bull Score Index collapsed to zero from 80, marking a dramatic shift in sentiment. That massive liquidation event on October 10 wiped out $19 billion and started this whole mess. Bitcoin was sitting pretty at $110,000 back then, but now it’s trading under $68,000. The 23% slide since November 12 tells the whole story – this isn’t just a dip anymore.
Things look pretty grim.
The technical picture got even worse when Bitcoin fell below the Traders’ On-chain Realized Price, a level that used to act as solid support during the bull run. Now traders are eyeing the $70,000 to $60,000 zone as the next place where buyers might show up. But there’s no guarantee they will. The last time Bitcoin broke this 365-day moving average was back in March 2022, and that didn’t end well for anyone holding crypto.
Demand basically disappeared. The Coinbase Bitcoin Price Premium turned negative, which means U.S. buyers aren’t stepping up like they used to. American ETFs that had gobbled up over 46,000 BTC are now dumping coins, selling off around 15,000 BTC recently. That’s created a demand gap of more than 50,000 BTC, and nobody’s filling it.
Spot demand growth crashed 93%.
The numbers don’t lie – annual demand shriveled from 1.1 million BTC down to just 77,000. That kind of drop usually means the party’s over for this cycle. Bitcoin’s price action reflects what happens when buyers disappear and sellers take control. Market participants who got in during the bull run are probably questioning their timing right about now.
Tether’s market cap growth went negative for the first time since October 2023, dropping $133 million. The stablecoin had peaked at $15.9 billion back in late October 2025, but now it’s shrinking. When Tether’s market cap contracts, it usually signals that people are cashing out of crypto entirely rather than just switching between coins. That’s not a good sign for Bitcoin or any other digital asset.
Binance reported trading volumes dropped 40% since November 2025. The world’s biggest crypto exchange seeing that kind of decline means retail traders and institutions alike are stepping back. Volume is the lifeblood of any market, and when it dries up, prices tend to fall harder and faster.
JPMorgan analysts said on February 3 that this looks just like early 2022 all over again. They pointed out that institutional buyers aren’t showing up to support prices like they did during previous dips. Without those big players stepping in, there’s nothing to stop the bleeding. The bank’s crypto team has been pretty bearish lately, and the price action seems to prove them right.
Grayscale cut its Bitcoin holdings by 10% over the past month, according to their February 5 announcement. The digital asset management firm cited risk management as the reason, but it’s really just another sign that even the crypto-focused institutions are getting nervous. When Grayscale starts selling, it usually means they see more downside ahead.
Ethereum dropped below $5,000 for the first time since mid-2025. The second-biggest crypto following Bitcoin down shows this isn’t just about one coin – the whole market’s in trouble. Altcoins typically get hit even harder than Bitcoin during bear markets, so Ethereum holders are feeling the pain too.
The SEC postponed decisions on several Bitcoin ETF applications on February 6. Regulatory uncertainty always makes crypto markets more volatile, and the timing couldn’t be worse. Investors were hoping for some positive news to help turn sentiment around, but instead they got more delays and question marks.
Michael Novogratz warned investors on February 4 to brace for “prolonged volatility.” The Galaxy Digital CEO compared current conditions to previous down cycles and basically told people to buckle up. When someone who’s made billions in crypto starts sounding cautious, it’s probably time to listen.
Kraken saw user activity drop 35% compared to November 2025 levels. Another major exchange reporting declining engagement confirms that retail interest is fading fast. The exchange’s spokesperson talked about “strategic patience,” which is Wall Street speak for “wait and see if things get worse.”
CoinShares reported $150 million in outflows from crypto investment products over the past week. That’s four straight weeks of money leaving the space, with Bitcoin products getting hit hardest at $90 million in withdrawals. Professional money managers are clearly telling their clients to reduce crypto exposure.
MicroStrategy stopped buying Bitcoin in December 2025, CEO Michael Saylor confirmed on February 6. The company that became famous for loading up on Bitcoin during every dip is now sitting on the sidelines. Saylor called it a “wait-and-see approach,” but it signals even the biggest Bitcoin bulls are having second thoughts about current prices.
The Federal Reserve’s hawkish stance on interest rates compounds Bitcoin’s troubles. Chair Jerome Powell’s February 8 comments about maintaining higher rates longer sent risk assets tumbling further. When traditional markets struggle, crypto typically gets hit twice as hard since institutional portfolios dump speculative holdings first.
Mining operations face mounting pressure as profitability margins shrink below sustainable levels. Marathon Digital and Riot Platforms both reported negative cash flows in January, forcing some smaller miners to shut down completely. Hash rate dropped 12% since December as older mining rigs became unprofitable, creating additional selling pressure from miners liquidating Bitcoin reserves to cover operational costs.
Post Views: 1
2026-02-08 21:001mo ago
2026-02-08 14:401mo ago
Paolo Ardoino: Stablecoins are core financial infrastructure, Tether's USAT enhances liquidity for US users, and the inevitability of stablecoin adoption | The Wolf Of All Streets
Tether's new stablecoin aims to transform liquidity and bridge the gap between crypto and traditional finance.
Key Takeaways Stablecoins are transitioning from niche crypto experiments to core financial infrastructure. Tether is launching USAT, a new stablecoin aimed at enhancing liquidity for US users. The future of finance may see tokenized deposits and transactions moving through stablecoins. Tether is evolving into a technology company focused on societal empowerment. USDT is expected to gain reciprocity as legislation evolves. Tether is a pivotal player in the crypto ecosystem, bridging traditional finance and crypto. Interoperability between traditional finance and crypto is being enhanced through strategic partnerships. Financial institutions are beginning to recognize the necessity of stablecoin solutions. Tether’s user base of over 536 million highlights its impact on financial inclusion. Tether’s technology development reflects a long-term vision, with recognition coming after years of groundwork. Banks have opportunities to innovate by adopting advanced technologies like blockchain. The maturity of US Treasuries is vital for stablecoin stability. Institutions need experienced professionals to avoid past mistakes in stablecoin development. A knowledge gap about stablecoins exists between smaller banks and multinational institutions. Stablecoin adoption is inevitable as banks recognize consumer demand for faster, cheaper transactions. Guest intro Paolo Ardoino serves as Chief Executive Officer of Tether, the largest stablecoin by market capitalization with USDT in $187 billion circulation globally. He previously served as Chief Technology Officer at Tether starting in 2017, co-leading the strategy that grew its market cap to $83 billion and solidified its position as a global stablecoin leader. Ardoino also continues as Chief Technology Officer of Bitfinex.
The evolution of stablecoins Stablecoins are becoming essential to the financial system, moving beyond niche status. “Stablecoins are no longer a niche crypto experiment they’re becoming core financial infrastructure today we have 536,000,000 users.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether is launching USAT to provide liquidity access for US users. “A lot of folks that have really wanted to enter the tether ecosystem from the US have been looking for a vehicle to do that and that’s what USAT provides.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of finance will likely involve tokenized deposits and stablecoin transactions. “Eventually you’re just gonna see basically stable coin sandwiches built deposits will be tokenized everything will be moving through stables.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s shift from a stablecoin provider to a technology company reflects its broader vision. “It’s not a stablecoin company tether it’s the stable company so a company that build technology to empower society to remain stable.” – Paolo Ardoino USDT is anticipated to receive reciprocity as legislation changes. “I’m very confident that usdt will receive reciprocity.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s role in the crypto ecosystem Tether is positioned as a key player in the crypto ecosystem, bridging traditional finance and crypto. “I mean you know tether is the most important player in the ecosystem and what we’re doing is building an on ramp to the us capital markets to that system.” – Paolo Ardoino Partnerships and interoperability are facilitating the merger of traditional finance and crypto. “We’re working to make usat interoperable with usdt via a variety of mechanisms whether that be through anchorage or issuer or through pools and exchanges.” – Paolo Ardoino Institutions are recognizing the need for stablecoin solutions as the financial landscape evolves. “As these institutions start to flesh out what this brave new world is gonna look like for them is help them to understand the technology and how it benefits their customers.” – Paolo Ardoino Financial inclusion and Tether’s impact Tether has achieved significant financial inclusion with over 536 million users globally. “Today we have 536,000,000 users across the world so that is the biggest financial inclusion success story in the history of humanity.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s technology was developed over eleven years before gaining widespread recognition. “We built the technology and we sit on it for eleven years before seeing the world recognizing it.” – Paolo Ardoino Banks have a unique opportunity to adopt advanced technology and innovate their products. “I think now the difference is that banks actually can adopt this technology and they can build new amazing products they can have twenty four seven trading they can have in instant settlements at the speed of light.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoin stability and banking opportunities The maturity of US Treasuries is crucial for the stability of stablecoins. “Having us treasuries is not necessarily the holy grail it’s also the maturity you need to have a short term maturity so that you want your treasury to be resilient to the changes also that could be from like interest rates environment.” – Paolo Ardoino New institutions must hire experienced professionals to avoid repeating past mistakes in stablecoin development. “I think it will be important for new institution… to hire people that have long term experience in stablecoins to make sure that they don’t redo the mistakes.” – Paolo Ardoino There is a significant knowledge gap about stablecoins among smaller banks compared to multinational institutions. “If you start going down the the totem pole in terms of just market scale and you’re talking to regionals or super regionals or even communities, I think the knowledge gap begins to widen.” – Paolo Ardoino The inevitability of stablecoin adoption Stablecoin adoption is inevitable as banks recognize consumer demand for faster and cheaper money movement. “I think they’ll slowly start to recognize their consumers are gonna have a demand for these products as well everyone wants to be able to move money at will whenever they want at a very cost effective manner and so you know it’s adoption is inevitable.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins enable 24/7 trading and settlement, enhancing global trade and banking operations. “From an interbank settlement perspective… they can settle over the weekends… it unlocks a lot of wide variety of different manners in which they can engage with the US.” – Paolo Ardoino Technology and societal impact The same underserved populations that struggle with traditional banking also lack access to AI services. “The very same people that cannot afford to have a bank account because they cannot pay 150 per year to make keep a bank account open are the same ones as you said that will not have the ability to purchase a subscription for a prominent ai platform.” – Paolo Ardoino The disparity in access to AI services could lead to significant societal instability. “How society can remain stable if we have the other side of the world so half of the population population of the world they will not become as intelligent so that is a huge risk to the stability of the world and to stability of society.” – Paolo Ardoino Decentralized energy solutions in Africa Decentralized energy solutions are essential for remote villages in Africa due to the lack of centralized infrastructure. “We cannot have centralized energy in africa because you cannot in these these villages are very far apart one way the other you cannot have long distance lines and a nuclear plant.” – Paolo Ardoino Decentralized energy kiosks are providing essential services to over a million users in Africa. “We have 800 kiosks now and 1,000,000 users paying to get these batteries and for them it’s a lifeline.” – Paolo Ardoino Technology should be built to be resilient and distributed, focusing on positive societal impact rather than profit. “We are not actually optimizing for yet another buck we are optimizing for positive impact on society.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of stablecoin integration The integration of stablecoins into the US financial system will be a blend of retail and traditional finance. “I think that Americans will pick up on the idea and concept of stablecoin integration from a retail level… I envision a world in which you’re gonna have access to a stablecoin wallet through your banking UX.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins can improve payroll efficiency and remittance processes for low-wage workers. “With stables… they can pay it almost on a daily basis and that’s a huge unlock for folks especially for folks that are engaged in remittances.” – Paolo Ardoino Predictions for stablecoin adoption and technology Stablecoin adoption will become extremely widespread in the US, blending crypto with traditional finance. “I strongly believe at the end of the day stablecoin adoption will be extremely widespread here domestically and I think that it’ll kind of blend this world of crypto into the traditional financial world in a way that’s you know really positive and leads to tremendous success for both retailers merchants banks and customers alike.” – Paolo Ardoino The user experience in crypto needs to improve for broader adoption, focusing on simplicity for consumers. “One of the main issues that I still see in the industry is user experience… most of the people in the world they don’t have time to understand crypto… they just want a dollar.” – Paolo Ardoino User experience and technology design User experience in technology should be designed to address real needs and problems of users. “The way we build technologies is it needs to be respectful of the actual needs and problems to the people that’s how that are always approached it and and be be helpful and and care about their their struggles and their frictions.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether Gold was created at the right moment, leading to its adoption despite initial skepticism. “USDT tether gold was born in thousand twenty for the first two three years it was like everyone was telling me oh why why you know we have much better products… so why people should care about gold the gold is not moving.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s strategic investments and market dynamics In the event of a black swan occurrence, society will revert to gold before adopting Bitcoin. “If a black black swan event happens in the next few years the world will go back to gold not yet to bitcoin.” – Paolo Ardoino Bitcoin is superior to gold, but we must acknowledge the current limitations of Bitcoin’s market cap. “I believe bitcoin is superior to gold by far but we cannot put our head under the sand we need to look at the type the moment in which we live.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s investment in gold serves as a hedge against economic instability rather than for speculative purposes. “We didn’t invest in gold to speculate on gold we invested in gold as a hedge against the craziness that was happening.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s gold position and compliance standards Tether’s gold position is significantly more profitable than many traditional trades. “The big short as a trade i think that you know made 1,000,000,000 in profits that short our gold position is probably 10 times that.” – Paolo Ardoino USAT is compliant because it is one-to-one backed and offers transparency, making it a trusted digital dollar. “The compliance standards are fairly simple right one to one back having the transparency… it’s the first unix compliant product out there it can be used as collateral in trading.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of product integration and compliance The long-term prospects for integration of these products in the marketplace are extremely positive. “I think that long term the prospects for just matriculation throughout the marketplace are are extremely positive and we’re gonna drive those things forward.” – Paolo Ardoino The writing will be on the wall that these products are here to stay, especially under the new compliance standard. “I think that the writing will be on the wall and it’ll be very clear that you know these products are here to stay especially under this new compliance standard.” – Paolo Ardoino Regulatory clarity and future technological coexistence Clear rules for the crypto ecosystem are essential for long-term adoption. “Clear rules of the road for the entire ecosystem is very healthy for long term adoption.” – Paolo Ardoino In ten years, we will see a coexistence of humans, robots, and AI agents, but stability in society is crucial for this to happen. “I think in ten years we are going to see a coexistence of humans robots and a trillion of ai agents… technology is the bond to keep society united stable.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins as a connecting tissue in future technology In ten years, stablecoins will play a crucial role in connecting various technologies and devices. “I believe in ten years we’re going to see our products doing exactly that be supporting people in their day to day lives… we’re going to see stablecoins to connect to be the connecting tissue between a robot, a self driving car, a person, a smart fridge, an intelligent light bulb.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins can transfer both value and information in a single transaction. “The beauty of stablecoins is that we just scratched the surface onto their potential… it can transfer everything; it can create incredible constructs that can be used not only by humans but also by the machines.” – Paolo Ardoino
Aptos [APT] has been under sustained selling pressure for a while now, with the price consistently trending lower on the chart.
In the last 30 days alone, APT recorded a 39% drawdown. Over a longer timeframe, the losses amounted to 67% from its November high of $3.37 – A sign of its persistent bearish structure.
With new supply scheduled to enter circulation, questions have emerged around APT’s near-term direction and whether inflation-driven pressure could outweigh improving on-chain signals.
Inflation risk moves into focus Aptos is scheduled for a token unlock on 10 February, introducing approximately $12.73 million worth of APT into circulation at press time valuations, according to DeFiLlama.
Here, token inflation refers to a hike in circulating supply due to new token issuance. It is typically used to reward network participants, support development, and incentivize ecosystem growth.
Source: DeFiLlama
The upcoming unlock represents 1.13% of Aptos’s total supply and 1.48% of its circulating supply, underlining its potential market impact. The distribution will be allocated across core contributors, the community, and investors.
Historically, token unlocks have often triggered short-term sell pressure as recipients liquidate newly issued tokens. With community members and investors accounting for over 50% of the unlocked supply, or roughly $6.58 million, downside risk might be elevated.
In an already weak altcoin environment, reflected by a market index reading of 24, additional sell pressure could accelerate price declines.
APT tests critical support as exhaustion hit On the weekly Binance chart, APT was trading at a pivotal technical level. The price had broken below the upper demand zone, previously highlighted as a key support area. At press time, it appeared to be hovering near the $1.00-level.
Failure to hold this support could result in a new all-time low, placing APT among a small group of assets to reach that threshold since the onset of the bear market.
While there is still some downside risk, technical indicators suggested that a rebound is still possible. Despite no confirmation or clear timing on the same.
Source: TradingView
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) entered a zone commonly associated with accumulation, where the probability of a price reversal increases too. It moved into oversold territory, a condition often linked to seller exhaustion and rising buyer interest at discounted levels.
This does not guarantee an immediate rebound though. And, further downside remains possible. However, historically, such conditions increase the likelihood of a corrective bounce.
Finally, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) also hinted at improving momentum.
Liquidity and capital flows remain supportive Despite price weakness, liquidity conditions did exhibit some resilience though. In fact, on-chain data indicated that the Total Value Locked (TVL), a measure of capital committed to the Aptos ecosystem, has continued to rise.
DeFiLlama data also revealed that since 06 February, the TVL has risen by $14.04 million. This implied that investors may be locking assets within the ecosystem, typically pointing to a longer-term view rather than short-term speculation.
Source: CoinGlass
Finally, in the spot market, exchange netflows hinted at steady accumulation. Weekly data revealed consistent outflows from exchanges beginning in early January, with $2.03 million worth of APT withdrawn this week alone.
However, short-term pressure persists. Daily netflow data found approximately $536,000 in net inflows to exchanges – Illustrative of ongoing selling activity.
Final Thoughts A $12.73 million token unlock is expected to increase the circulating supply, raising downside risk. On-chain indicators and capital flows suggested there may be early signs of selective accumulation by buyers.
2026-02-08 21:001mo ago
2026-02-08 15:001mo ago
Rap Star Drake Uses Stake to Wager $1M in Bitcoin on Patriots Despite Super Bowl LX Odds
Drake has never been shy about betting big, but on the eve of Super Bowl LX, the global music star took it up another notch by placing a $1 million wager on the New England Patriots—despite the majority of betting markets lining up against them.
The brutal volatility of bitcoin in February 2026 caused an unexpected wave. While the price collapsed from $81,500 to $60,000 in less than a week, Google searches for this crypto reached their highest level in a year.
In brief Google searches for Bitcoin hit their highest level in 12 months in early February. This rise coincides with a sharp price drop and extreme volatility. Retail investors seem to be coming back, despite an atmosphere of extreme fear. The context remains fragile due to clearly bearish technical and on-chain signals. Google Trends confirms renewed interest during the bitcoin crash Google Trends data do not lie. During the week of February 1, 2026, global interest in Bitcoin surged reaching the maximum score of 100 on Google’s scale. This peak occurred precisely when the crypto was going through one of its most turbulent periods in over a year.
The drop was spectacular. In just five days, Bitcoin fell from $81,500 to about $60,000, a decline of more than 26%. This level had not been seen since October 2024. This extreme volatility acted like a magnet for retail investors curious to understand what caused such a meltdown.
The last comparable peak dates back to November 2025 when Google Trends had recorded a score of 95. At the time, bitcoin had just fallen below the symbolic threshold of $100,000. A pattern emerges: retail investors are more interested in Bitcoin when it falls than when it rises.
Analysts, particularly Bitwise’s Europe head, see this as “a return of retail trading.” Individual investors are looking for low-price buying opportunities despite a climate dominated by fear. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index at 6 out of 100 confirms this mood of “extreme fear.”
Multiple catalysts in a structurally fragile market Several factors combined to create this perfect storm. On February 7, the South Korean platform Bithumb made a monumental technical error by accidentally distributing more than $40 billion worth of bitcoins to its users. This bug triggered local panic and an immediate wave of selling, amplifying the global downward pressure.
At the same time, the crypto market was facing the repercussions of a “multi-asset deleveraging.” The weakness of large US tech stocks forced many investors to liquidate their crypto positions to meet margin calls in other markets. Bitcoin served as the adjustment variable.
The network itself showed signs of stress. The mining difficulty adjustment registered a historic drop of 11.16% on February 7, the largest since 2021. This correction reflects miners’ difficulties, faced with high energy costs and plummeting revenues. A significant portion of computing power was taken offline.
These events align with CryptoQuant’s analysis, which confirms the break of bitcoin’s 365-day moving average, a major technical signal not observed since March 2022. This break marks, according to experts, the formal entry into a prolonged bear market.
In sum, the paradox is striking: while Bitcoin goes through its worst phase in over a year, public attention reaches a peak. Volatility, much more than optimism, remains the true driver of interest in cryptos. This dynamic suggests retail investors react more to fear and perceived opportunities than to long-term conviction.
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Fenelon L.
Passionné par le Bitcoin, j'aime explorer les méandres de la blockchain et des cryptos et je partage mes découvertes avec la communauté. Mon rêve est de vivre dans un monde où la vie privée et la liberté financière sont garanties pour tous, et je crois fermement que Bitcoin est l'outil qui peut rendre cela possible.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2026-02-08 21:001mo ago
2026-02-08 15:121mo ago
Kyle Samani Slams Hyperliquid Days After Leaving Multicoin
Kyle Samani Slams Hyperliquid Days After Leaving MulticoinSamani steps back from Multicoin as wallets linked to the firm accumulate Hyperliquid’s HYPE.Public criticism of Hyperliquid fuels speculation over internal thesis disagreements.Debate highlights growing ideological split between decentralization and high-performance crypto infrastructure.Kyle Samani stepped down from Multicoin Capital on February 5, 2026, after nearly a decade as co-founder. Today, he is publicly criticizing Hyperliquid (HYPE) as on-chain data shows Multicoin purchased over $40 million in HYPE tokens.
The close timing has fueled speculation that internal conflicts over investment strategy prompted the departure of one of the most notable Solana advocates in the crypto industry.
Multicoin, Hyperliquid, and Kyle Samani: Coincidence or Clash?Samani’s departure announcement on February 5 marked a significant shift for Multicoin Capital, a leading force in institutional crypto investment.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Despite his departure, Samani stated he would remain engaged in cryptocurrency, especially within the Solana ecosystem.
1/ I will remain in my role as Chairman of Forward Industries.
As part of the redemption request that I intend to submit to Multicoin’s Master Fund for March 31, 2026, I will request an in-kind redemption in FWDI shares and warrants rather than in USD, pending Multicoin’s…
— Kyle Samani (@KyleSamani) February 4, 2026 The announcement came only days after MLM analysts flagged wallets believed to be linked to Multicoin accumulating large amounts of Hyperliquid’s HYPE token in late January.
They highlighted purchases totalling tens of millions of dollars. Additional analysis suggests that substantial ETH flows were rotated into HYPE over several days via intermediary wallets.
Looks like wallets linked to Multicoin Capital are rotating a large amount of ETH into HYPE.
Since January 22, wallets sent 87.1K ETH ($220M) to a Multicoin-linked Galaxy Digital deposit address. On January 23, one day after the first deposit, a Multicoin-linked wallet started… https://t.co/LrJyoCTQ3m
— MLM (@mlmabc) February 4, 2026 Notably, no official confirmation has linked the trades directly to Multicoin’s internal strategy decisions.
Today, February 8, just three days after his formal exit, Samani is criticizing Hyperliquid on social media, making his position unmistakably clear.
“Hyperliquid is, in most respects, everything wrong with crypto. The founder literally fled his home country to build Openly, which facilitates crime and terror. Closed source Permissioned,” wrote Samani in a post.
This strong criticism stands in direct contrast to Multicoin’s high-profile investment in HYPE tokens. As a result, observers wondered if Samani’s views clashed with the firm’s recent decisions, helping drive his exit.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Solana Investment Philosophy Versus HYPE StrategyMulticoin Capital earned its reputation as a vocal backer of Solana. In September 2025, the firm led a $1.65 billion private investment into Forward Industries, working with Jump Crypto and Galaxy Digital to create what they called “the world’s leading Solana treasury company.”
Samani was named Chairman of Forward Industries’ Board, underlining his importance to Multicoin’s Solana focus.
The Solana investment strategy centered on transparent yields through staking, DeFi protocols, and capital efficiency. Multicoin highlighted Solana’s infrastructure as offering better economics than Bitcoin treasury models, citing native yields of 8.05% as of September 2025.
The firm also released research on Solana projects like Jito, which by March 2025 powered over 94% of all Solana stake via custom block production technology.
Hyperliquid, meanwhile, represents a contrasting approach. The platform is a decentralized perpetual futures exchange with its own blockchain.
It is popular for high leverage and low fees, but faces criticism for its centralized validator system, closed-source code, and regulatory risks. These features appear to oppose the principles Samani promoted at Multicoin.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Tensions between strategies became more evident as analysts speculated about internal dynamics.
“Does this mean that they couldn’t buy HYPE as long as Kyle was running the fund, which is why his leaving coincides with Multicoin buying a lot of HYPE?” wrote one user.
Kyle Samani did not immediately respond to BeInCrypto’s request for comment.
Supporters Defend Hyperliquid as Samani’s Exit Sparks Ideological DebateSome investors and traders pushed back strongly against Samani’s criticism. They argue that Hyperliquid represents a return to crypto’s original principles rather than a departure from them.
Hyperliquid is in most respects everything wrong with crypto
> Rejected VC capital
> Democratized MMing via HLP
> Enriched community via largest token airdrop ever ($9B)
> Instead of pocketing some or all of the $960M revenue HL has made, put them all into buybacks of said token https://t.co/XVk2NEDeyG
— steven.hl (@stevenyuntcap) February 8, 2026 Hyperliquid’s decision to direct revenue toward token buybacks and community incentives reflects a model designed to more closely align users and infrastructure than many venture-backed projects.
Sponsored
Sponsored
The divide highlights a deeper ideological split emerging within crypto markets. On one side are investors who prioritize transparency, decentralization, and community ownership as defining principles.
On the other hand, there are those who champion performance, liquidity depth, and institutional-grade infrastructure, even when those systems require trade-offs in governance or architecture.
If you're wondering who the marginal buyer will be at $20 billion, remember that
– HL is faster than Solana
– Has a better UX than Drift
– Its present value of future MEV is in the trillions
Hyperliquid is the culmination of all of Multicoin Capital's thought leadership. And…
— Kunal G (@kunalgoel) November 29, 2024 Samani’s departure itself has not been formally tied to any specific investment decision. Neither Multicoin nor Samani has publicly stated that Hyperliquid or portfolio positioning played any role in the transition.
Sometimes, leadership changes at venture firms often stem from long-term strategic shifts, personal decisions, or fund-structure considerations that may not be visible externally.
Still, the timing has proven difficult for markets to ignore. In crypto, an industry where narratives travel quickly, the combination of on-chain transparency and social media speculation often fills gaps left by limited official disclosures.
Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Performance. Source: TradingView Meanwhile, the HYPE token is nurturing a recovery, with a higher low on the 4-hour timeframe, suggesting a trend reversal if buyer momentum sustains.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
2026-02-08 21:001mo ago
2026-02-08 15:571mo ago
Ethereum Staking Demand Hits Record Levels as Exit Queue Remains Minimal
TLDR: Staking entry queue reaches 4.05M ETH, exit queue only 38K ETH, showing overwhelming demand. ETH price remains under $2,000 despite record network activity and staking growth. Large holders and ETFs increase selling pressure, adding short-term market volatility. Selective accumulation occurs during dips, supporting medium-term stabilization in ETH supply. Ethereum staking demand is reaching unprecedented levels, with over 4 million ETH waiting to enter while exit orders remain minimal.
This surge reflects strong long-term conviction, structural scarcity, and growing network participation despite recent price declines below $2,000.
Staking and Network Activity Ethereum’s staking queue shows a clear imbalance between entries and exits. The entry queue holds 4.05 million ETH, while exit requests total only 38,000 ETH.
This demonstrates overwhelming demand. Validators choose long-term yield and network alignment over liquidity.
The 70-day wait to stake confirms that protocol limits cannot match current demand. Meanwhile, exit orders clear in hours, showing no panic.
This situation reduces circulating ETH and limits immediate sell pressure. When combined with Ethereum’s burn mechanism, structural scarcity increases.
Therefore, staked ETH effectively leaves the liquid supply, supporting potential upward movement.
Ethereum network usage remains strong. Transfer counts reached 1.1 million on a 14-day average, demonstrating active token movement.
However, network activity alone cannot reverse recent price declines or short-term selling.
Retail participation is declining. Futures open interest dropped from $26.3 billion to $25.4 billion in one day.
As a result, network activity contrasts with weak capital flows, causing temporary price compression despite higher usage.
Large Holders, ETFs, and Price Dynamics Large holders have added to short-term selling pressure. Trend Research sold 170,033 ETH, while Vitalik Buterin and Stani Kulechov sold smaller amounts.
Consequently, supply increased amid weaker market demand. BitMine Immersion Technologies holds 4.28 million ETH, of which 2.9 million is staked.
This generates an estimated $188 million annualized revenue. Therefore, staking reduces liquid supply while maintaining long-term treasury support.
Spot ETH ETFs experienced outflows totaling $80.79 million on February 5, with Fidelity’s FETH accounting for $55.78 million. Consequently, passive selling continues steadily, adding supply pressure without quick reversals.
Derivatives data show liquidation risk between $1,509 and $1,800. Leveraged positions could trigger forced selling if prices drop further.
Meanwhile, selective accumulation occurs as long-term investors buy during dips. ETH may test $1,500–$1,800 if selling persists.
Simultaneously, staking reduces liquid supply, and high network activity provides gradual stabilization. Thus, structural scarcity continues even while short-term volatility remains.
2026-02-08 20:001mo ago
2026-02-08 14:001mo ago
Cardano's relief rally is good news, but here's why it might not last!
Cardano [ADA] was in the news recently when it was reported that the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) will support ADA Futures products starting Monday, 09 February. Alongside Cardano, Chainlink [LINK], and Stellar [XLM] would also be part of the CME’s crypto products.
The news came at a time when the crypto market was in turmoil. In fact, Bitcoin [BTC] has shed nearly 30% since 15 January, while Cardano has posted losses of 34% since then.
The bulls managed to defend the major support level at $0.267, for now. Can the CME news sustain this bounce?
Long-term trend does not favor Cardano buyers
Source: ADA/USDT on TradingView
The weekly structure was firmly bearish, and has been since October. The loss of the $0.53 support zone, which had been important in the first half of 2025, was a huge blow. At the time of writing, another key support at $0.246 had been tested.
A recent AMBCrypto report had noted that the $0.22-$0.27 area has served as a long-term Cardano demand zone since late 2022. The weekly timeframe saw a wick to $0.22 in the first week of June 2023, marking the lows bulls do not want to see invalidated.
Forecasting the next play – Will the short-term bounce continue or fizzle out?
Source: ADA/USDT on TradingView
The bullish divergence between the RSI and the price has nearly finished playing out. The 78.6% retracement level at $0.287 is likely to be tested briefly before ADA resumes its longer-term downtrend.
Traders’ call to action – Sell? It is feasible to go short upon a retest of $0.287, targeting $0.22, with invalidation above the local high at $0.305. For long-term investors, there is no hurry to buy at the market bottom. Especially since it can take weeks and months to form.
Traders should be aware of the possibility of a liquidity hunt beyond $0.3, especially if Bitcoin climbs past $74k to push towards $80k. In this scenario, the $0.33-$0.35 supply zone should be the ceiling of the rally.
Final Thoughts Cardano has a long-term bearish bias, and the short-term bullish momentum divergence has nearly finished playing out. Fibonacci retracement levels presented a short trade setup targeting the $0.22 lows. Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion
Akashnath S is a Senior Journalist and Technical Analysis expert at AMBCrypto. He specializes in dissecting price action, identifying key market trends through advanced chart patterns, and forecasting both short-term and long-term asset trajectories. His distinct analytical method is grounded in his academic training as a Chemical Engineer. This background provides him with a systematic, process-oriented approach to market data, enabling him to analyze the complex dynamics of financial markets with precision and objectivity. Having actively covered the cryptocurrency space since the landmark 2017 market cycle, Akashnath possesses years of experience navigating both bull and bear markets. This seasoned perspective is critical to his insightful reporting on market volatility and evolution. As an active market participant, Akashnath enhances his analysis with crucial, hands-on experience. This practical application of his technical skills ensures his insights are not merely theoretical, but are also relevant and actionable for an audience looking to understand and navigate trading opportunities. He is dedicated to educating readers on the nuances of technical analysis, empowering them with the knowledge to make more informed financial decisions.
2026-02-08 20:001mo ago
2026-02-08 14:321mo ago
Bitcoin ETF flow numbers are fundamentally broken and most traders are missing the specific sign of a crash
On Jan.30, 2026, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $509.7 million in net outflows, which looks like pretty straightforward negative sentiment until you look at the individual tickers and realize a few of them stayed green.
That contradiction aged fast over the next few days. Feb. 2 snapped back with $561.8 million in net inflows, then Feb. 3 flipped to -$272.0 million, and Feb. 4 sank to -$544.9 million. The totals went up and down, but the more useful clue was the same one hiding in plain sight on Jan. 30: the category can look like one trade from a distance, while the money inside it moves in very different rhythms.
By the time Bitcoin slid below $71,000, ETF flows and price finally started to rhyme.
If you're trying to read the ETF flow table like a mood ring, the table will definitely mislead you. The total number you see in the table is a scoreboard, not the play-by-play, and it can easily be dragged around by one large exit even while smaller pockets of demand keep persisting. The green islands in the deep red sea are real, but it's rarely the heroic resistance signal people want it to be.
Why “total flows” lie on the days you care most aboutSecondary-market trading is people swapping ETF shares with each other, while primary-market creations and redemptions are what change the share count. Flow tables almost always aim at the second layer, the net creation or destruction of shares. The SEC’s investor bulletin makes the key distinction very clear: ETF shares trade on an exchange, but supply changes through the creation and redemption process.
That split matters because a day can see crazy volumes and price action and still print zero flows for a given fund if buyers and sellers just match each other in the secondary market. And a day can print a huge outflow because one or a few large holders decide to redeem, even if there's steady buying elsewhere.
This is why dispersion is worth tracking. Instead of staring at the net number, count how many funds are green versus red, then ask how concentrated the red is. On Jan. 30, the numbers were brutal everywhere: IBIT -$528.3 million versus a -$509.7 million total, which means the rest of the complex was slightly positive when you add it up. FBTC's $7.3 million, ARKB's $8.3 million, and BRRR's $3 million inflows were small, but they were still inflows.
At the beginning of February, we saw a much cleaner example of what broad-based demand looks like and what a concentrated exit looks like.
On Feb. 2, net inflows were spread across the leaders, including IBIT's $142.0 million and FBTC's $153.3 million, BITB's $96.5 million, and ARKB's $65.1 million inflows joining in. That's what a category-wide “buy day” looks like in the flow data: more than one desk, more than one platform, and more than one fund.
On Feb. 3, the table turned into a lesson in internal conflict. IBIT was still up $60.0 million, while FBTC printed -$148.7 million and ARKB -$62.5 million, pulling the total to -$272.0 million. The category was net red while the biggest vehicle stayed green, which is the mirror image of Jan. 30’s story. The takeaway here is not that one ticker smart money and the others aren't, but that the ETF market now has different buyer types with different rules, and they don't all hit the button at the same time.
On Feb. 4, the outflows deepened to -$544.9 million, with IBIT -$373.4 million and FBTC -$86.4 million leading the day, plus smaller outflows across other funds. That was the day Bitcoin dipped under $72,000 in a broad risk-off backdrop.
When analyzing the ETF market, it's important not to treat every green print as fresh conviction. A micro-inflow can be real demand, but it can also be allocation drift getting corrected, a model portfolio topping up a sleeve, or a platform with scheduled behavior that doesn't really care what crypto Twitter is doing this week. Big totals are often driven by a much smaller number of actors than people assume, and small prints can be driven by a much larger number of small accounts than the headlines imply.
The real reasons micro-inflows happen, and what February’s slump did to themThe easiest explanation is the least satisfying and the most frequent: one large redemption can dominate the day. Jan. 30 was a single-ticker gravity well, with IBIT’s $528.3 million outflow overwhelming everything else. Feb. 4 did something similar, with IBIT's $373.4 million outflowdoing most of the work.
Next comes distribution behavior. Some funds get embedded in advisor platforms and model portfolios where allocations update on schedules, sometimes monthly, sometimes quarterly, sometimes when a portfolio crosses a risk band. That sort of demand can remain steady even when fast money is de-risking, and it can show up as small greens on days when the total looks ugly.
Then there's internal switching. Investors rotate between products for reasons unrelated to Bitcoin’s fundamentals: fees, familiarity with a particular issuer, operational comfort, or an institution consolidating exposure for reporting simplicity. A switch day can look like there are buyers in one fund and sellers in another, while the true story is that it's the same exposure, just with a different wrapper.
The Feb. 4–5 slump adds one more ingredient that makes dispersion louder: forced deleveraging in the rest of the crypto market. When the market slides quickly and liquidations pick up, desks that need to raise cash sell what they can, and that can include ETF positions.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
That backdrop helps explain why a flow table can look chaotic across tickers even when price action looks like one clean slide into the red. A risk-off day is never just one single decision to sell BTC; it's a pile of different constraints hitting different players at different times.
By Feb. 5, the price drop itself became the headline, with Bitcoin trading around $70,900 after falling below $71,000, and mainstream coverage tying the move to a broader selloff across markets.
So, how do you tell when a green print matters?
A single small inflow on a red-total day is usually weak evidence of anything except the fact that not everyone left at once. It starts to matter when the greens repeat across multiple red-total days, and when the greens broaden across multiple funds, because that tends to mean demand is coming from more than one channel. That is what made Feb. 2 stand out inside this short window.
So when the total is red, ask three questions before you jump to any conclusions.
How concentrated is the outflow, meaning how much of the day is explained by the single biggest red print?
How many funds are green, because broad greens usually mean broader participation rather than one platform doing a scheduled top-up?
And does it repeat, because one day can be calendar effects, routing, or one institution moving size, while repetition is where behavior starts to show?
Jan. 30 taught the core idea with a paradox, and Feb. 3 and Feb. 4 sharpened it. The ETF market is now big enough to hold multiple agendas at once, and the flow table will keep looking contradictory as long as people insist on reading it as one crowd with one opinion.
Mentioned in this articlePosted in
2026-02-08 20:001mo ago
2026-02-08 14:491mo ago
Canton Network: Wall Street's Hidden Blockchain Settles $350 Billion in Daily Repo Trades
TLDR: Canton Network processes $350 billion in daily repo transactions across over 600 validator nodes globally DTCC tokenizing U.S. Treasuries on Canton with SEC approval, targeting MVP launch in first half of 2026 JPMorgan’s Kinexys announced plans to issue JPM Coin deposit token natively on Canton Network in January Platform carries over $6 trillion in tokenized real-world assets with privacy features for regulated firms
Canton Network has emerged as a major institutional blockchain infrastructure, processing $350 billion in daily repo transactions.
The Layer 1 blockchain carries over $6 trillion in tokenized real-world assets across more than 600 validator nodes.
Major financial institutions, including JPMorgan, DTCC, Goldman Sachs, and Franklin Templeton, have deployed production systems on the network.
The platform handles over 700,000 daily transactions while maintaining privacy requirements for regulated financial institutions.
Privacy-First Architecture for Regulated Finance Canton Network operates as a Layer 1 blockchain designed specifically for financial institutions moving real-world assets on-chain.
Digital Asset built the platform around privacy between counterparties, rapid settlement, and native compliance features.
Traditional public blockchains display every transaction to all network participants, creating legal obstacles for banks required to maintain client confidentiality.
Delphi Digital noted that “$350 billion a day settles on a blockchain many people have never heard of.” The network solves privacy challenges through DAML smart contracts that embed access and authorization rules directly into assets and transactions.
Two firms can complete trades without exposing details to outside parties. Regulators maintain necessary access while other network participants cannot view unrelated activity.
Settlement happens atomically, eliminating the multi-day clearing processes common on traditional financial rails. Both sides of trades execute simultaneously, removing windows where one party has delivered while the other has not.
According to the analysis, “there is no window where one party has delivered, and the other hasn’t,” eliminating risk categories in repo markets where hundreds of billions move daily.
The platform enables different financial applications to interact natively across the network. A tokenized treasury on one platform can serve as collateral on another platform within a single transaction.
Cross-application settlement between regulated institutions occurs without central intermediaries, a capability not previously demonstrated at this scale.
Production Deployments from Major Institutions Daily repo volumes reached $350 billion in recent months, up from $280 billion in August 2025. Broadridge operates its entire Distributed Ledger Repo platform on the network as the first major live deployment. Banks and institutions use repo markets to borrow short-term against Treasury collateral.
DTCC is tokenizing U.S. Treasury securities on Canton Network, backed by SEC No-Action Letter approval. The project targets an MVP release in the first half of 2026 with broader rollout planned for later that year.
DTCC joined the Canton Foundation as co-chair alongside Euroclear. As observers emphasized, this is “not a test. Not a pilot.”
Franklin Templeton expanded its tokenized fund platform to the network, joining Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, and Deutsche Börse.
JPMorgan’s blockchain unit Kinexys announced plans to issue JPM Coin, its USD deposit token, natively on Canton Network in January.
Fireblocks subsequently integrated the platform and became a Super Validator, providing regulated custody for institutional clients.
The validator network includes HexTrust and Tharimmune, the first NASDAQ-listed company operating as a super validator. These regulated firms run production systems processing real transactions under regulatory oversight.
The network lacks public block explorers, reflecting its institutional focus. As noted, “Canton was not built for retail. It was built for the firms that move your money.”
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 11:161mo ago
Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Plunges 11% in Biggest Drop Since China Ban
Bitcoin’s mining difficulty crashed 11.16% today. The network just recorded its steepest decline since Chinese authorities banned crypto mining back in 2021, sending shockwaves through mining operations worldwide and raising fresh questions about the system’s stability.
Mining difficulty works as Bitcoin’s automatic balancing mechanism, adjusting every two weeks to keep new blocks coming at steady intervals. When difficulty drops this hard, it means mining gets easier – but it also signals that computing power probably left the network. The last time we saw anything close to this magnitude was during China’s crackdown, when miners scrambled to relocate their operations across the globe. Back then, the network eventually adapted, but not without major disruptions that lasted months.
Things look different now. But not really.
Glassnode’s data shows hash rate – basically the network’s total computing muscle – fell to levels not seen since mid-2025. Some miners clearly shut down their rigs already, probably because costs got too high or profits dried up. When hash rate drops like this, it’s usually bad news for network security, though Bitcoin’s design can handle the fluctuations.
Core Scientific made waves February 6th when the publicly traded mining giant said it’s reviewing its entire operational strategy. The company didn’t mince words about needing to cut energy costs and find alternative power sources. For a major player to admit they’re scrambling, that’s telling.
Bitcoin’s price sits around $42,000 as of February 8th. Traders are watching closely.
Market participants can’t decide if this price level holds or if more network instability triggers selling. Binance reported futures trading jumped 15% compared to last week – people are hedging their bets hard. The uncertainty is real, and it shows in the numbers.
The Bitcoin Mining Council scheduled an emergency meeting for February 20th. Industry heavyweights want to hash out collaborative responses to keep operations viable. Council members represent some of the biggest mining outfits, so their decisions carry weight. What they decide could shape how the entire industry adapts to these swings.
CryptoQuant thinks energy shortages in Kazakhstan and Russia might be driving the difficulty drop. Both regions face brutal winter conditions right now, and power outages have been hitting mining farms. It’s unclear how long these disruptions will last, but they’re definitely impacting global hash rate calculations.
Smaller mining companies are sweating bullets. BitFarms CEO Emiliano Grodzki said February 8th that while big firms might survive these fluctuations, smaller players could get crushed. “The viability question becomes real when you’re operating on thin margins,” Grodzki told reporters. He didn’t specify which operations might shut down, but the concern is obvious.
And the timing couldn’t be worse for some operations. Many mining companies took on debt during Bitcoin’s previous bull run, betting on sustained high prices and stable network conditions. Now they’re facing a double squeeze – lower profitability from difficulty swings and pressure to service those loans.
The next difficulty adjustment in two weeks will tell the real story. If hash rate keeps dropping, we might see another significant decrease. If miners return to the network, difficulty could bounce back up. Nobody knows for sure, which is why futures markets are so active right now.
Mining pools are staying quiet about their strategies. Reached for comment, several major pools didn’t respond to requests about operational changes. The silence probably means they’re still figuring out their next moves.
What’s clear is that this difficulty drop isn’t just a technical hiccup. It reflects real pressures on mining economics – energy costs, regulatory uncertainty, and market volatility all playing their part. The network will adapt eventually, but the adjustment period could be bumpy.
Some analysts think this might actually be healthy for Bitcoin long-term. Weaker mining operations get shaken out, leaving stronger players who can weather these storms. But that’s cold comfort for miners watching their profit margins evaporate.
The February 20th council meeting can’t come soon enough. Industry leaders need to coordinate their response before more hash rate disappears. Without collective action, individual mining companies might make decisions that hurt the broader network’s stability.
Bitcoin trades at $42,000, but that number feels fragile right now.
Historical data shows difficulty adjustments of this magnitude typically trigger cascading effects across the mining ecosystem. During the 2021 China exodus, it took approximately four months for hash rate distribution to stabilize globally, with mining operations relocating from Sichuan and Inner Mongolia to Texas, Kazakhstan, and Nordic countries. The current drop suggests similar displacement patterns, though geopolitical tensions in Eastern Europe add complexity that wasn’t present during the Chinese crackdown.
Energy markets compound the pressure facing miners today. Natural gas prices in Europe remain elevated due to ongoing supply constraints, while Texas grid operators issued conservation warnings for February amid unusual weather patterns. Marathon Digital and Riot Platforms, two major U.S. mining firms, both reported curtailing operations during peak demand periods to avoid penalties from grid operators.
Post Views: 14
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:001mo ago
Bitcoin – Here's why $60K remains the ‘key structural level' for traders
The last few weeks have seenn crypto markets fall across the board. This has left many analysts and market participants wondering what may be the cause. While the crash might just be the product of a normal bear market, speculations have continue to pile up.
Recent allegations by Jim Cramer on CNBC’s Squawk Box have triggered market attention too.
What did Jim Cramer say? After Bitcoin‘s price fell below the realized price of $79.1k, it was termed as a rare “Black Swan” event. However, Jim Cramer looked at the move to $60k with optimism. On an episode of CNBC Live’s Squawk Box, Jim Cramer said that the U.S government is now buying Bitcoin. According to the analyst,
“I heard at $60k he’s gonna fill the Bitcoin Reserve you better cover.”
For its part, the crypto community did not take the rumour mongering seriously, with some labeling Cramer as a joker.
Some even claimed that he might be confusing Strategic Reserve and Strategic Holdings. Given the absence of established rules for the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, the latter might just be more plausible.
Here, it’s worth pointing out that Cramer’s assertion also lacks on-chain backing. Needless to say though, the statement led to many looking at the market differently.
A hike in market confidence? For instance, the odds of a potential rate cut for the 18 March FOMC meeting rose by 5%. As per data from CME Group, the probability climbed from 18% to 23.2% during the weekend.
Usually, such growth is illustrative of confidence among traders and investors. This is because they can borrow more to pour into risk-on assets for lower interest pay. The result is bullish for Bitcoin and the rest of crypto.
Source: CME Group
However, the figures were still very low, suggesting that a rate cut decision remains difficult. In the past, when they went through, the probability was in the 80th percentile or more.
That brings us to the big question – Do these allegations lend more weight to the significance of BTC’s $60K-level?
Any key levels to watch? Bitcoin’s price charts revealed an aggressive bounce after hitting $60,000. The importance of the zone was proven by the association with the U.S government buying price at a psychological level.
Moreover, this order-block zone initiated the rally that saw BTC hit a high of $126k in 2025. Also, it was the nearest bullish liquidity swing.
Source: BTC/USD on TradingView
However, the RSI divergence indicator indicated that bear pressure was still present. This increased the likelihood of breaking below this zone.
On the contrary, the Bitcoin Mayer Multiple hit a value of 0.6. This implied that BTC was undervalued, and a bounce could be on the cards. This finding seemed to be perfectly aligned with expectations of upside from the world’s largest crypto.
Source: CryptoQuant
While it did not affirm a price bottom, it hinted that the risk approach might be changing as the markets absorbs fear.
Such episodes happened during bear markets’ bottoms in December 2018, March 2020, and November 2022. Each time, a strong rebound followed suit.
Final Thoughts Jim Cramer believes that the U.S government bought Bitcoin at $60,000. Bitcoin seems to be trading above a reversal point as the crypto market absorbed panic over the last few weeks.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:011mo ago
Do CME gaps always have to fill? Bitcoin's $60k flush says no
Bitcoin trades every minute of every day, but CME Bitcoin futures stop for the weekend. That mismatch is how a CME gap is born, and why it keeps turning up in the middle of the most stressful weeks.
A CME gap is the blank space on a CME futures chart between Friday’s final traded level and the first traded level when the market reopens Sunday evening (US time). CME futures trade on a weekly schedule with a weekend break, while spot Bitcoin keeps moving. When the first CME print lands far from Friday’s close, the chart draws a jump and leaves an empty zone in between. That zone is the gap.
CryptoSlate’s report on this topic made the key point that the gap is not a mystical force, but a record of time when one market was closed, and the other was still trading. This is not about prophecy. It’s about a calendar mismatch that becomes visible on charts.
This week gave us a clean, real-world demo.
On the continuous CME Bitcoin futures chart, the Friday (Jan. 30) close printed around $84,105, and the first Sunday reopen printed near $77,730, leaving a roughly $6,375 weekend gap. Then the drawdown accelerated.
Bitcoin slid from about $72,999 at the start of Feb. 5 to a low of $62,181 on Coinbase, and then printed near $60,000 early Feb. 6 before rebounding into the mid $60,000s. CME’s 30-minute series shows the same shape, with a low near $60,005 and a rebound toward $66,900.
Even with that kind of volatility, the prior Friday level in the mid $80,000s stayed far overhead. The gap remained open through Feb. 6 because the price never got close enough to revisit it.
That’s a good place to start, because it answers the question most non-traders are really asking when they hear the term “gap.” They're asking why two prices that both say BTC can look like they live in different universes for a moment, and why that mismatch sometimes disappears as the week goes on.
How a gap forms when one Bitcoin market takes the weekend offCME lists cash-settled Bitcoin futures that trade in a near-continuous weekly session: Sunday evening through Friday afternoon, with a daily break, and a hard weekend stop. But spot Bitcoin doesn’t have that off switch, so if a big move hits on Saturday, CME can’t print it in real time. The chart just has no data for that stretch.
When CME reopens, it doesn’t resume trading from the Friday close. It resumes from wherever the market is at the opening hour. If spot is down 8% or up 6% while CME was closed, the first futures trade will reflect that, plus whatever premium or discount futures carry at the reopen. The result is a visible jump, and the empty zone between Friday’s last level and Sunday’s first level becomes the gap.
Graph showing Bitcoin futures on CME from Jan. 15 to Feb. 6, 2026 (Source: TradingView)The important part is what happens next, because the gap existing in the first place is a calendar fact, but the gap getting filled is market behavior.
Think of the gap as a skipped page in a book. Friday ends on a cliffhanger, the weekend writes three chapters somewhere else, and CME comes back with a whole new chapter. The skipped pages are still missing on the CME chart, but the story has already advanced on spot exchanges.
This is also why the gap meme can feel persuasive in weeks like this one. When Bitcoin is calm, the reopen is close to Friday’s close, so there is no dramatic blank space to talk about. When Bitcoin is violent, the blank space is big, and the human brain treats big blank spaces as unfinished business.
Myth vs. reality:
Myth: “CME gaps have to fill.”Reality: Gaps often fill because markets tend to converge once CME liquidity returns, but they do not have to fill on any schedule. In trend weeks, the gap can sit open for a long time.Why gaps often get filled, and why this week shows the limitsA “gap fill” simply means price later trades back through the empty zone, often all the way to the prior CME close. CryptoSlate’s explainer argued that this happens so often because, once CME is live again, there are practical incentives to pull futures and spot back toward each other.
That pull is just a set of boring, repeatable reasons that tend to show up during staffed market hours.
If futures and spot are far apart, there’s money to be made in narrowing the difference. Companies that can access both markets can buy low and sell high, aiming to profit as the spread compresses.
This is a convergence process driven by arbitrage and relative-value positioning rather than a belief that Bitcoin must go up or down. You can understand the intuition without touching the trade, because two linked markets rarely tolerate a huge disagreement for long once liquidity is back, and risk limits are active.
Then there’s the attention effect. Gaps are now widely tracked and shared, which emphasizes their importance during price volatility. When lots of people watch the same level, liquidity tends to gather there. That liquidity can make it easier for the price to revisit the area, especially in choppy markets where mean reversion is already in play.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
CryptoSlate’s previous report backed the claim that gaps fill with numbers from its own study, showing a high fill rate and a tendency for many fills to happen quickly once CME sessions resume. That helps explain why the gap myth survives: it has enough historical reinforcement to feel like a rule, even though it isn’t one.
This is where Feb. 5 and Feb. 6 matter, because they show the boundary case that keeps the story honest.
Bitcoin dropped hard, touched $60,000, and then snapped back, causing over $1 billion in liquidations in just 24 hours.
That is the kind of environment where the CME gap starts mattering less. When the market is dumping and leverage is being forced out, price doesn’t care about a few missing candles in CME’s chart from the week before. It cares about where bids actually exist right now.
Both Coinbase and CME fell into the low $60,000s, then bounced toward the mid $60,000s. So, the old CME Friday close near $84,105 stopped being a magnet for price and started looking more like a distant marker.
This is also why the open gap can be a better explaining tool than predicting one.
In a calm market, fills can happen quickly because the price is already oscillating and liquidity is comfortable revisiting prior levels.
In a stressed market, the open gap is a reminder that the price has moved so far that the old close is simply out of reach in the near term. That’s not a failure of the concept; it’s just the concept doing its job: showing the consequences of a weekend move that never got retraced.
The Feb. 6 coverage of corporate Bitcoin treasuries adds a second layer that makes the story feel bigger than chart culture. CryptoSlate reported that the slide toward $60,000 pushed corporate holders deeper underwater on paper, and it singled out the stress this creates for companies whose equity story is built around Bitcoin exposure.
This gives us a very grounded reason why this drawdown felt different. It didn’t stay contained inside crypto venues, but kept bleeding into balance sheets and public narratives. That isn’t the kind of week where price just returns to a Friday close because a gap exists.
Treat the CME gap as a level traders notice, not a level Bitcoin owes you. Gaps matter most when the market is already mean-reverting, and liquidity is comfortable revisiting old prices.
In liquidation regimes and trend weeks, the gap can stay open because the market is busy dealing with something bigger than chart symmetry.
Mentioned in this articlePosted in
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:051mo ago
Bitcoin starts a fragile rebound after its brutal collapse
Bitcoin tries to catch its breath after a spectacular plunge. Fallen to 59,930 dollars, the king of cryptos is trying today a difficult return around 70,000 $. However, is this recovery sustainable or is it just a respite before the next shock?
In brief Bitcoin trades at $70,854 on February 8, 2026, after a dizzying 37% drop from its highs. Moving averages and MACD show decidedly bearish signals across all time frames. US Bitcoin ETFs show signs of stabilization with $330.7M inflows on Friday, led by BlackRock. Bitcoin tries to restart after a major correction The bitcoin price is currently oscillating within a narrow range between $68,443 and $70,976. This volatility hides a harsh reality: the asset has just suffered a 37% collapse at the beginning of the year. Liquidations exceeding one billion dollars fueled this bearish spiral. Institutional investors massively reduced their positions, creating a gaping void in demand.
BTC/USD daily chart. Source: Bitstamp The technical analysis leaves little room for optimism. All moving averages, whether simple or exponential, point downwards. The daily chart draws a succession of lower highs and lows. The MACD remains firmly anchored in the red.
BTC/USD 4-hour chart. Source: Bitstamp The only positive point: the hourly chart shows ascending lows between $67,313 and $71,673, suggesting that some opportunistic buyers are returning.
The key resistance is at $71,673. A clear break above this level could open the way to $74,000, or even $79,000. However, the opposite is just as likely. Failure to stay above $68,000 would bring the price back towards the $60,000 support. Traders watch every move with the nervousness of those who have already burned their fingers.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs offer a valuable indicator of institutional sentiment. Last Friday, they recorded $330.7 million inflows after three days of net outflows totaling $1.25 billion.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust led the way with $231.6 million. However, this lull does not dispel the worries. On Thursday, the same ETF had set a record with $10 billion in trading volume, accompanied by a 13% drop.
The market shifts into a structural bearish phase CryptoQuant sounded the alarm in early February. The break of the 365-day moving average, observed recently for the first time since March 2022, officially marks the entry into a prolonged bear market.
Since this break about 83 days ago, Bitcoin has fallen 23%. This drop is faster and more violent than the one observed during the 2022 bear phase.
On-chain indicators confirm this gloomy diagnosis. CryptoQuant’s “Bull Market” index shows zero. The growth of stablecoin supply is negative, revealing a contraction in available liquidity.
Coinbase premium remains in the red, a sign that American investors no longer actively support prices. Trading volumes collapse. No inverse capitulation signal appears on the horizon.
The macroeconomic context doesn’t help. High interest rates maintained by the Federal Reserve weigh on all risky assets. Bitcoin no longer enjoys its status as a decoupled asset from traditional markets. Institutions that had massively accumulated in 2025 have stopped buying. Some are even selling. This institutional disaffection amplifies the bearish pressure.
Bitcoin is at a critical turning point. Bulls bet on a decisive break of $75,000 to reverse the trend. Bears consider this rebound just a flash before a return to $60,000. Are we witnessing the beginnings of a prolonged bear market?
Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.
Join the program
A
A
Lien copié
Fenelon L.
Passionné par le Bitcoin, j'aime explorer les méandres de la blockchain et des cryptos et je partage mes découvertes avec la communauté. Mon rêve est de vivre dans un monde où la vie privée et la liberté financière sont garanties pour tous, et je crois fermement que Bitcoin est l'outil qui peut rendre cela possible.
DISCLAIMER
The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:051mo ago
CoinShares says only 10,200 BTC face real quantum risk, pushing back on ‘overblown' estimates
CoinShares said quantum computers would have to become 100,000 times more powerful, which could take a decade of scientific progress, to break Bitcoin.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:141mo ago
Aave Founder Drops £22M on London Mansion as UK Luxury Market Cools
Despite London's cooling luxury market, crypto leader Stani Kulechov snaps up a £22 million mansion.
Stani Kulechov, founder of decentralized finance protocol Aave, has purchased a five-story Victorian mansion in London for around £22 million (worth approximately $30 million).
This is one of the city’s priciest residential deals over the past year, according to Bloomberg.
Kulechov’s London Buy The property is located in the upscale Notting Hill area, which was acquired in November at roughly £2 million below its initial asking price, shortly before the UK’s autumn budget. The transaction stood out against a cooling luxury housing market, which has been weighed down by higher stamp duties and policy changes introduced under the Labour government, including the rollback of tax advantages for wealthy foreign residents.
Data from property research firm LonRes revealed that sales of homes priced above £5 million slowed significantly toward the end of last year. It remains unclear whether any digital assets were used in the purchase.
Kulechov founded Aave in 2017 under its original name, ETHLend, which was later rebranded as Aave. In 2023, the company behind Aave briefly adopted the Avara umbrella brand to manage multiple Web3 initiatives. Aave has grown into one of the largest DeFi lending platforms. Beyond lending, Kulechov has been involved in several crypto initiatives, including the GHO stablecoin and consumer-facing blockchain products. He had also publicly expressed support for the UK as a potential hub for crypto innovation.
Brand Overhaul The purchase comes as Aave Labs is narrowing its focus to its core lending business. Earlier this month, the company said it would shut down the Avara umbrella brand, which previously grouped several Web3 projects, including the Family crypto wallet and the Lens decentralized social platform.
Under the change, all products will operate solely under the Aave Labs name, including the Aave mobile app, Aave Pro, and Aave Kit. The company said that the main objective behind the move is to simplify its brand and concentrate resources on growing the Aave protocol and expanding its user base.
You may also like: These Popular Altcoins Lost the Most in the Last 24 Hours: What You Need to Know Report: Aave Power Struggle Triggers $500M Market Cap Slide Ripple Notches Major Regulatory Victory From the UK’s FCA: Details The decision also follows ongoing questions around control within the DeFi ecosystem. The Aave DAO, governed by AAVE token holders, manages the protocol’s smart contracts and on-chain revenue, while Aave Labs controls the official website, branding, and other off-chain assets.
Tensions emerged last year after the company made changes to the official interface that redirected certain fees away from the DAO treasury. A community proposal to take control of Aave Labs’ intellectual property later failed, though discussions around revenue sharing and branding continue.
Tags:
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:421mo ago
BREAKING: Michael Saylor Hints at Buying More Bitcoin
Michael Saylor sparks excitement with a new "More Orange" teaser on X. Explore Strategy's latest Bitcoin holdings and what these hints mean for the market.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 13:001mo ago
Crypto market's weekly winners and losers – M, MYX, BNB, XMR, and more!
Crowd favorites Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] both slipped, posting weekly losses of around 10% and 13%. However, while the majors struggled, not every coin moved in the same direction.
Grab your coffee, and here’s a look at the biggest winners and losers in crypto this week.
A volatile week for Memecore [M] Memecore [M] had a choppy week, with wide price swings rather than a clean trend. After slipping to a weekly low near $1.28, the token made its way back up, going up about 23% to around $1.58. That bounce pushed prices close to the $1.9 zone before sellers stepped back in.
Source: TradingView
At the time of writing, M was trading near $1.57, giving up part of those gains and closing the latest session down roughly 15% on the day. Despite the pullback, the recovery from the lows showed buyers were active at cheaper levels.
With pace looking slow for now (with price settling around the middle of its recent range and indicators like RSI close to 50), neither side is fully in control yet.
MYX Finance [MYX] holds while the market finds its feet MYX Finance [MYX] had a steadier week compared to its peers, managing to stay on the front foot while markets bounced back. The token climbed from around $5.40 earlier in the week to about $6.44 at press time – A gain of roughly 18% from the local lows. Prices briefly tested the $6.8-$7.0 zone before cooling off.
But importantly, MYX managed to hold above the $6.5 area for most of the week.
Daily performance was modest, with the latest session closing up about 1.4%. Strength indicators remained healthy, so all’s stable on the MYX front… for now.
Midnight [NIGHT] fights back after a rough slide Midnight [NIGHT] had a mixed week, with a short-lived recovery after a steady drop. The token fell to a weekly low near $0.046 before buyers stepped in, pushing prices up to around $0.054-$0.055. That move caused a rebound of roughly 17% from the lows.
However, the momentum didn’t fully stick.
At press time, NIGHT was trading near $0.0537, with the latest session closing down about 2.2% on the day. The price spent much of the week moving sideways after the bounce. Strength remained fairly balanced, with RSI at around 47. While NIGHT appears to be stabilizing, there seems to be a lack of confident direction.
Weekly losers Binance [BNB] takes a big fall Binance [BNB] had a rough week, with sellers firmly in control for most of the move. The token dropped from the $760-$770 region to a weekly low near $600; a decline of roughly 15% at its worst.
The fall happened during a clear rise in trading volume during the decline.
Source: TradingView
At press time, BNB was trading around $643, well below last week’s levels. The price spent the latter part of the week moving sideways, so sell pressure has calmed but the belief hasn’t returned.
RSI was near 26, showing BNB remains deeply oversold, while DMI indicated that the downside control remains firmly intact.
Monero [XMR] slipped lower with persistent sell pressure Monero [XMR] took a tough beating in the last few days, staying under pressure with little room for a rebound. The token slid 20% from the $400 region to a weekly low near $290. A small bounce followed, but it lacked strength.
At press time, XMR was trading around $325.7, down about 1.1% on the day. There was weak pace, with RSI near 33. While XMR looked to be stabilizing, the fall appeared to have dashed traders’ faith in the privacy coin.
The ZCash [ZEC] downtrend continues Zcash [ZEC] had another weak week! The token fell from the $290-$300 range to a weekly low close to $200, a drop of just over 30% at its worst. Buyers did step in near those lows, helping ZEC recover slightly.
At press time, ZEC was trading around $234, down about 2.7% on the day. Still, the rebound lacked follow-through, and prices struggled to move meaningfully higher. RSI was near 32, and money flow also stayed negative.
Wrapping up… Some tokens tried their best, some face-planted, and others just stood there pretending nothing happened. If there’s one takeaway, it’s that the market is still moody, selective, and absolutely not taking instructions from anyone.
As always, this isn’t a shopping list. DYOR, double-check the numbers, and don’t let one green candle persuade you as quickly as it can fall.
Same time next week. Bring snacks.
Final Thoughts Bitcoin and Ethereum’s double-digit weekly losses set the tone, but selective buying kept some of the market alive. Confidence and belief is driving crypto right now.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 13:011mo ago
Bitcoin bulls spot bottoming signs as longtime bears take victory laps
Bitcoin bulls spot bottoming signs as longtime bears take victory lapsThe Financial Times and Peter Schiff were among the no-coiners giving themselves pats on the back as crypto crashed this week. Feb 8, 2026, 6:01 p.m.
With crypto's multi-month downturn accelerating into a freefall last week, bulls were frantically grasping for technical signals, or maybe yarns about the blowup of some leveraged hedge fund, that might signal a final bottom for this bear market.
Perhaps the ultimate sign of a bottom, though, might be the cheers arising from those who have been faithfully bearish on bitcoin BTC$69,614.17 as its price rose from $0 to more than $100,000 over its 16-year lifespan.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Over the years, the Financial Times has surely stood above all traditional publications in its steadfast opposition to bitcoin and crypto. The London paper’s team of truly talented writers has seemingly never wavered from a firm no-coiner stance, and this week was their moment.
"Bitcoin is still about $69,000 too high," was the headline of a Sunday essay by the FT's Jemima Kelly that wonderfully summed up Kelly's and the FT's general stance over the last decade-plus. [The FT subsequently changed the headline to "$70,000 too high" after bitcoin rose overnight].
"Ever since its creation, bitcoin has been on a journey that will end, splattered on the ground," Kelly wrote. "This week has shown us that the supply of 'greater fools' that bitcoin relies on is drying up," she continued. "The fairy tales that have been keeping crypto afloat are turning out to be just that. People are beginning to wake up to the fact that there is no floor in the value of something based on nothing more than thin air."
Earlier in the week, with the price of bitcoin declining below the $76,000 average cost basis of BTC treasury giant Strategy (MSTR), the FT's Craig Coben published, "Strategy's long road to nowhere."
With the stock already down about 80% from its record high of late 2024, Coben in February 2026 declared, "Management has no safe choices — only different paths to destroying shareholder value ... it is hard to see the case for buying into a vehicle that has merely broken even on its investments over five years."
"Like a gigantic mastodon stuck in La Brea tar pits," Coben concluded. "Strategy is flailing for a way out."
Peter Schiff joins inWith gold — despite a good deal of recent volatility — continuing in a major bull cycle, longtime goldbug and bitcoin critic Peter Schiff was feeling his oats as well.
"According to Michael Saylor, bitcoin is the best-performing asset in the world," he wrote on Tuesday. "Yet Strategy invested over $54 billion in bitcoin over the past five years, and as of now the company is down about 3% on that investment. I'm sure the losses over the next five years will be much greater!"
"Bitcoin below $76,000, it's now worth 15 ounces of gold, down 59% from its Nov. 2021 high," Schiff continued. "Bitcoin is in a long-term bear market priced in gold."
Other signs"I refuse to pick bottoms," once said former hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry. "Monkeys spend all their time picking bottoms."
As Hendry noted, it's probably a good idea not to get too cute timing one's buys to headlines like those seen in the FT this week. It's probably fairly safe to say, though, that some sort of bottoming process is underway.
In other news this week that would never appear near tops, it appears that investor interest in Tether is evaporating. With the crypto market still perky late last year, it was reported that the stablecoin issuing giant was in talks to raise $15-$20 billion at as much as a $500 billion valuation.
According to a report in the FT on Tuesday, however, investors appear to be pushing back against that valuation, and capital-raising efforts may only be on the order of about $5 billion.
For its part, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino told the FT that the original reports of a $15-$20 billion capital raise were a "misconception," and that Tether had received plenty of interest at that $500 billion valuation.
Nevertheless, according to the report, investors have privately raised concerns about that lofty valuation. Things are fluid, the report continued, and a crypto rally could quickly change sentiment.
Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 13:221mo ago
Pudgy Penguins Hit New York City With Valentine's Day Pop-Up Event
In brief Pudgy Penguins is hosting a pop-up Valentine's Day event in New York City this week. The crypto-native brand is selling a plush bouquet at the event, with an online offering already sold out. The Pudgy Penguins team plans to expand the V-Day event internationally next year. The Pudgy Penguins team is helping fans celebrate Valentine’s Day in the real world with Pudgy Petals, a three-day immersive pop-up event in New York City that highlights gifting and connection via its colorful characters.
Running February 12-14, the activation invites guests into the love story of Polly and Pengu (aka Pax), core characters in the Pudgy Penguins universe. The team told Decrypt that the brand—which has expanded from NFTs to games, real-world toys, and beyond—is using Valentine’s Day as a cultural entry point to continue to translate its internet-native IP into a broader brand.
At the center of the pop-up is the Pudgy Penguins Plush Bouquet ($49.99), an alternative to traditional flowers. The bouquet features plush characters and soft textures designed to last well beyond the holiday. An online drop of the bouquet has already sold out, but it will also be available at the pop-up.
Pengu and Polly are taking over NYC this Valentine's Day!
Join us at our Pudgy Petals pop-up store from February 12-14 for a celebration of our Valentine's Day collection, love, and all things Pudgy. pic.twitter.com/EJUszK6jwb
— Pudgy Penguins (@pudgypenguins) February 6, 2026
“The Plushie Bouquet marks our first Valentine’s Day expression,” Pudgy Penguins Director of Business Development Steve Starobinsky told Decrypt. “The item is intentionally positioned as a long-lasting symbol of companionship designed to be kept and revisited rather than discarded after a few days like traditional flowers or candy. This item embodies our aim of creating new rituals of affection rooted in meaning rather than tradition.”
The event includes on-site bouquet customization with flash tattoos, free aura readings, and couples photo booths. There will also be pink and blue matcha drinks and treats outside the space.
The Pudgy Penguins Valentine's Plush Bouquet. Image: Pudgy PenguinsThe programming will shift slightly each day. Thursday, February 12, aligns with both New York Fashion Week and the New York Toy Fair, tapping into a creative crowd already circulating downtown Manhattan. Friday, February 13, is branded as Polly’s Galentine’s, with a focus on friendship and groups. And Saturday, February 14, centers on couples and classic Valentine’s moments, leaning fully into the holiday vibe.
“Every detail of the pop-up is intentionally designed to encourage guests to linger, participate, document the experience, and share it socially,” Starobinsky said. “The space will be inviting and joyful, for all those who join the fun.”
Beyond the Valentine’s theme, Pudgy Petals represents a broader brand evolution. Pudgy Penguins, which began as an internet-native phenomenon and NFT project, is continuing its shift into physical retail and experiential spaces that require no familiarity with crypto. The pop-up prioritizes emotional storytelling and accessibility, rather than technology.
“We are a four-quadrant brand appealing to adults and kids, women and men, with categories such as toys, gifting, lifestyle, and experiential retail drawing people in,” Starobinsky added.
The timing of the activation is equally strategic, with Starobinsky noting that the overlap with those other NYC events puts “Pudgy Penguins at the intersection of fashion, toys, pop culture, and retail innovation.” And it won’t be the last V-Day event, he said.
“Pudgy Petals is not a one-time activation,” Starobinsky added. “We are going to expand this pop-up globally in 2027, leveraging it to launch more product capsules for this holiday.”
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 13:341mo ago
BTC Tests $70K Resistance: Could Bulls Rally to $75K or Drop Toward $65K?
The cryptocurrency community has unleashed a torrent of mockery and defiance against the Financial Times following the publication of a scathing opinion piece declaring that Bitcoin is effectively worthless.
The article, penned by FT columnist Jemima Kelly and titled "Bitcoin is still about $70,000 too high," argues that the leading cryptocurrency is destined to hit zero.
Kelly compares Bitcoin holders to the protagonist of the French film La Haine, a man falling from a skyscraper who comforts himself on the way down by repeating "so far, so good," before inevitably splattering on the ground.
HOT Stories
The 'bottom signal'For veteran market participants, mainstream media declaring Bitcoin "dead" is often interpreted as a contrarian indicator that the bottom is in.
"NOW we can confidently say Bitcoin's bottom has been reached. When outdated, incompetent, arrogant media start posting...is when Bitcoin starts flying," a user wrote on X.
You Might Also Like
The sentiment was echoed by other industry commentators. "The FT calling Bitcoin dead? Very bullish," he stated.
Other reactions were more visceral, targeting the Financial Times' declining influence and relevance in the digital age.
User Bram Kanstein mocked the publication's inability to grasp the asset class, sarcastically cheering them on: "Fading the most profound technological discovery of your industry, well done!!"
Others expressed disbelief that such hardline skepticism still exists in 2026, writing, "I can't believe people still write things like this."
2026-02-08 19:001mo ago
2026-02-08 13:561mo ago
Bitmine Strategically Boosts ETH Holdings During Market Stress and Volatility
TLDR: Bitmine added 42,000 ETH in one week, reflecting sustained accumulation during heightened market volatility The latest 20,000 ETH purchase occurred near market lows, signaling strategic timing rather than reactive buying Staking remains central to Bitmine’s model, with projected annual rewards tied to validator expansion plans Bitmine equity trades below NAV despite rising ETH holdings and improving Ethereum network activity. Bitmine Ethereum accumulation has gained attention as the firm increased exposure during a broader crypto market downturn.
The move reflects a disciplined strategy centered on long-term fundamentals, staking income, and balance sheet growth rather than short-term price action.
Bitmine Ethereum Accumulation Confirms Sustained Buying and Strategic Timing Bitmine Ethereum accumulation accelerated during a period of sharp selling across digital asset markets. On-chain data showed the firm acquired 20,000 ETH from a Kraken hot wallet during heightened volatility.
The purchase, valued at approximately $41.98 million, occurred without public statements or coordinated messaging. Market participants identified the transfer after wallet activity was shared on X.
According to Lookonchain data cited in those posts, the transaction took place within hours of the broader market downturn. The timing suggested planned accumulation rather than reactive buying.
Over the same week, Bitmine added roughly 42,000 ETH in total. Holdings now approach 4.17 million ETH, reflecting consistent balance sheet expansion.
Charts shared across social platforms showed steady increases in ETH balances. There were no visible distribution patterns or abrupt reductions in holdings.
Liquidity during the period remained thin, with forced sellers present across major venues. Such conditions often allow long-term participants to accumulate supplies efficiently.
Bitmine’s approach aligned with historical institutional behavior during prior market drawdowns. Accumulation occurred quietly while sentiment remained cautious.
The absence of hedging activity reinforced the view that ETH was treated as a strategic reserve asset. Price volatility appeared secondary to position sizing.
Staking Strategy and Valuation Context Shape Bitmine Positioning Bitmine Ethereum accumulation is closely linked to its staking-focused operating model. The firm emphasizes yield generation to reduce idle asset risk during price weakness.
Chairman Tom Lee stated that stakeholder income could reach $374 million annually. This projection depends on full deployment of the Made in America Validator Network in 2026.
Staked ETH provides recurring revenue regardless of short-term price movement. Validator participation also supports Ethereum network security and decentralization.
Ethereum network metrics continue to show resilience. Daily transactions recently reached 2.5 million, while active addresses climbed to one million.
Lee referred to the recent pullback as an attractive entry point during remarks shared on X. He cited growing validator participation and steady network usage.
Bitmine’s equity valuation presents an additional layer. Shares recently traded near $20.44, below the reported NAV per share of $21.25.
This places the stock at approximately 0.96 times MNAV. The discount suggests the market values Bitmine’s ETH holdings below spot value.
ETH rebounded to around $2,123, gaining nearly three percent intraday. However, Bitmine’s equity closed slightly lower, reflecting ongoing caution.
As volatility stabilizes, balance sheet growth, stakeholder income, and network fundamentals remain central to Bitmine’s positioning.
2026-02-08 18:001mo ago
2026-02-08 11:521mo ago
Does MUB's Tax Exemptions Give It the Edge Over IEI?
Both IEI and MUB are top ETFs for bond market exposure. But MUB's tax exemptions may be of strong interest for investors.
Offering exposure to the fixed-income market, the iShares National Muni Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:MUB) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:IEI) both have a strong portfolio of government bonds. This comparison highlights how each fund stacks up on cost, yield, performance, and risk.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricMUBIEIIssueriSharesISharesExpense ratio0.05%0.15%1-yr return (as of Feb. 7, 2026)0.59%2.61%Dividend yield3.13%3.51%Beta0.250.15AUM$42.61 billion$17.89 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
IEI has a higher annual fee but delivers a modestly higher yield and one-year return than MUB. But because MUB holds over 70 times more assets in its portfolio, it’s a broader investment with a higher AUM.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricMUBIEIMax drawdown (5 y)-11.88%-13.89%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$916$898What's insideIEI holds 87 positions focused exclusively on U.S. Treasury bonds that mature in three to seven years, providing pure government exposure with minimal credit risk. The fund is nearly two decades old and holds AA-rated bonds, the second-best rating.
MUB spreads its assets across more than 6,000 investment-grade municipal bonds, with most of its holdings in bonds issued by state and local governments, unlike IEI, which focuses more on federally issued bonds. Interest earned from this ETF is exempt from U.S. income tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsOver the last 12 months and throughout its existence, IEI’s price has performed better and with lower risk, with 100% of its holdings being federally-backed bonds. However, one can’t ignore MUB’s tax exemptions.
While AMT taxes generally apply to high-income investors, not having to pay income tax on interest means investors do not have to pay the IRS on the interest they earn. However, the ETF is not exempt from state taxes, so investors should check with their local state to see how taxes apply.
Another potential advantage for MUB is that, by design, it should be more volatile because it holds no federal bonds and consists of lower-rated assets than IEI.
This comes with risk, as lower ratings increase the likelihood of default by bond issuers. But if investors are willing to take on the risk, the increased volatility and tax exemptions may make MUB an option to consider.
2026-02-08 18:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:001mo ago
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Bath & Body Works, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm
NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Bath & Body Works, Inc. (NYSE: BBWI) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Bath & Body securities between June 4, 2024 and November 19, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BBWI.
Bath & Body Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose to investors:
(1) the Company's strategy of pursuing "adjacencies, collaborations and promotions" was not growing the customer base and/or delivering the level of growth in net sales touted;
(2) as the Company's strategy of "adjacencies, collaborations and promotions" faltered, the Company relied on brand collaborations "to carry quarters" and obfuscate otherwise weak underlying financial results;
(3) as a result, the Company was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance; and
(4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
What's Next for Bath & Body Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BBWI. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Bath & Body you have until March 13, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Bath & Body Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Bath & Body Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
2026-02-08 18:001mo ago
2026-02-08 12:001mo ago
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges BellRing Brands, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm
NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired BellRing securities between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BRBR.
BellRing Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose materially adverse facts. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that:
(1) the Defendants failed to disclose to investors that its strong sales results did not reflect increased end-consumer demands or brand momentum;
(2) rather, customers accumulated excess inventory as a safeguard against product shortages that had previously constrained BellRing’s supply;
(3) once customers gained confidence that product shortages were a thing of the past, they promptly reduced their inventory by selling through existing products and cutting back on new orders; and
(4) following the destocking, the Company admitted that competitive pressures were materially weakening demand.
What's Next for BellRing Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BRBR. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in BellRing you have until March 23, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to BellRing Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for BellRing Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
In the mid-2010s, Wall Street became smitten with finding the next iPhone supplier.
Skyworks Solutions Inc. (SWKS)… Cirrus Logic Inc. (CRUS)… Universal Display Corp. (OLED)…
These companies often saw their shares jump double-digits when a tech blog or analyst note reported that Apple Inc. (AAPL) had picked them as a supplier.
Yet, Apple was often a terrible customer. The smartphone maker famously demanded low prices and high quality, making it almost impossible for physical hardware makers to turn a profit. The charts of many iPhone supplier stocks ended up looking like Mount Everest.
Here’s an early-2010s one from semiconductor supplier Cirrus Logic…
Instead, the big winners of the iPhone revolution turned out to be those providing experiences on top of these smartphone systems. Ride-hailing firm Uber Technologies Inc. (UBER), former TikTok owner ByteDance, and mobile advertising company AppLovin Corp. (APP) are now worth more than even the largest iPhone suppliers.
A similar scenario is now playing out in artificial intelligence.
Last week, we saw a massive selloff in AI’s “infrastructure” companies. Chipmakers… data center developers… power utilities…
These suppliers to OpenAI dropped double digits on fears about how much money they were sinking into a profitless industry.
InvestorPlace Senior Analyst Louis Navellier believes this is only a warning sign.
In a new presentation, he warns that February 25 could be the date when the market faces a sharp AI Dislocation. Expectations are simply too sky-high among these “Stage 1” companies building out the physical side of artificial intelligence.
Most investors will either panic-sell or buy the dip in precisely the wrong names… just as they did with iPhone suppliers in years before.
Fortunately, Louis believes that a small group of companies still offers ~500% upside thanks to being on the “Stage 2” end of the AI Revolution.
You can sign up for the presentation here.
In the meantime, I’d like to take two top stocks and illustrate why experience-focused AI companies will become critical, and why now is a great time for long-term investors to start buying the dip in some of these select names.
Let’s jump in…
The AI Legal Expert In 2009, Google added legal document search to its Google Scholar search engine.
Many feared it would replace LexisNexis and Westlaw – the two dominant legal research platforms of the day. Google monopolized other search fields. Why not law as well?
But that never happened. You see, legal research doesn’t just require speed. It also needs evaluations, notes, secondary analysis, and other information that doesn’t show up in court briefs and rulings. Law firms additionally require airtight accuracy – something that no large language model (LLM) can guarantee.
That’s why Thomson Reuters Corp. (TRI) should eventually dig out of the 60% selloff that began in the middle of last year. The Westlaw owner has spent the past several decades creating the best-in-class legal research portal, and virtually every important court ruling (especially from appellate courts) is collected, researched, and vetted for significance. Much of the legwork is now done by AI, of course, but humans still check the final product.
In addition, Thomson Reuters has meticulously curated its other brands. The company sold its position in the London Stock Exchange in 2024 and used the cash to buy AI-focused acquisitions, including Additive (AI-powered tax document processing) and SafeSend (“last mile” automation of tax returns). The company also acquired Casetext in 2023, an early adopter of AI-powered legal research (now called CoCounsel). Growth is therefore expected to remain in the upper single digits, while net profits should rise twice as quickly.
Now, it’s certainly possible for AI companies to muscle in on Thomson Reuters’ businesses. After all, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is 100 times larger and could still crush the smaller firm by outspending it.
But doing so would mean hiring an entire team of salespeople, legal experts, and customer service agents to sell a Westlaw competitor… not to mention the work of annotating briefings, taking customer phone calls, and making database changes when errors are discovered. That would quickly become an enormous distraction for any tech firm.
Outfits like OpenAI and Anthropic are even less likely to compete with Thomson Reuters. These AI startups are racing to build the next generation of LLMs… and getting bogged down with creating a Westlaw competitor is a surefire way to fall behind.
Instead, these LLM firms are more likely to sell their AI product to Thomson Reuters and let the legacy firm handle the experience of using AI for legal research.
So, even though it might take a while for sentiment to improve, shares of TRI should eventually recover. According to my models, it has a 105% upside from here – an excellent investment for any long-term buyer.
The AI Provider to the Fortune 500 ServiceNow Inc. (NOW) has spent the past two decades building out a platform that reduces complexity in IT and business processes. The company was an early adopter of AI technologies and quickly expanded from its core IT service management (ITSM) business into customer service, talent development, sourcing, order management, and more.
Today, ServiceNow’s platform is used by more than 85% of Fortune 500 companies, and the company boasts a sky-high 98% customer retention rate. The software firm is also growing like wildfire. Revenue rose 21% in 2025, and analysts expect another 20% growth this year. Earnings per share are on track to surge 49%.
There are two keys to ServiceNow’s success.
Modular System. ServiceNow’s platform makes it easy to cross-sell additional services. If an existing customer wants to add a human resources management system, it’s a phone call away. Furthermore, each additional product a customer uses increases the amount of data ServiceNow has about the company, making the system even more powerful. Roughly 75% of customers use multiple ServiceNow products. Artificial Intelligence. The second “secret sauce” ofServiceNow is the high quality of its AI systems. The company’s data analytics product is reportedly even better than those offered by AI darling Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR), and its development team has worked quickly to make dedicated AI agents for specific tasks, such as customer service and IT. The plain fact is that ServiceNow should continue to grow because future AI projects will need structure. No matter how advanced OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s systems become, these chatbots need a platform to ingest data, come to conclusions, and do so in a repeatable way.
In other words, ServiceNow controls the experience that companies have in working with large language models.
The company is also valued at a tiny fraction of high-flying rival Palantir. In fact, ServiceNow could triple its share price and still be cheaper on virtually every valuation metric.
And so, I see the recent selloff as an opportunity to buy ServiceNow. Investors might be panicking about some software stocks for the right reasons… but concerns about ServiceNow are clearly overblown.
What GPT-5 and 5G Have in Common 5G technologies were an incredible leap forward when they were launched in 2019. The mobile data network used high frequencies, multiple bandwidths, and a more efficient network core that regularly transferred 500 megabits per second of data – more than enough to watch a high-definition movie on smartphones.
If 4G was a two-lane road of data, then 5G is a 12-lane interstate on a quiet weekend.
Interestingly, the biggest 5G winners were not the infrastructure companies that allowed 5G technologies to exist. Shares of AT&T Inc. (T) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) have fallen since 2019.
Instead, the greatest success stories were firms like Netflix Inc. (NFLX), TikTok, and Apple – the companies that stream videos and provid the smartphones that display this entertainment. Every $10,000 invested in Netflix in 2019 was worth $35,000 by 2025.
Similarly, OpenAI’s GPT-5 represents a generational leap ahead in AI technologies. GPT-5 and its close rivals are now good enough to perform research… write code… and look a little like the 5G leap forward.
And much like 5G, the winners are increasingly looking like the “Stage 2” companies that come after the infrastructure gets built.
That’s why last week’s selloff of all AI-related companies was totally unwarranted. Many of these are “Stage 2” specialists that use AI themselves to provide a better product. And crucially, these companies provide the human-AI hybrid that guarantees accuracy in the way that pure AI models cannot.
That’s why my colleague Louis Navellier just released his brand-new AI Dislocation broadcast.
In this free presentation, Louis explains why a whole new cohort of AI stocks could succeed current “Stage 1” winners. It’s a group of firms that will dominate in a world where AI experience matters more than raw computing power.
To learn more about these under-the-radar “Stage 2” AI stocks, click here.
Until next week,
Thomas Yeung, CFA
Market Analyst, InvestorPlace
Thomas Yeung is a market analyst and portfolio manager of the Omnia Portfolio, the highest-tier subscription at InvestorPlace. He is the former editor of Tom Yeung’s Profit & Protection, a free e-letter about investing to profit in good times and protecting gains during the bad.