Market Signal Briefing

Tether's new stablecoin aims to transform liquidity and bridge the gap between crypto and traditional finance.

Key Takeaways Stablecoins are transitioning from niche crypto experiments to core financial infrastructure. Tether is launching USAT, a new stablecoin aimed at enhancing liquidity for US users. The future of finance may see tokenized deposits and transactions moving through stablecoins. Tether is evolving into a technology company focused on societal empowerment. USDT is expected to gain reciprocity as legislation evolves. Tether is a pivotal player in the crypto ecosystem, bridging traditional finance and crypto. Interoperability between traditional finance and crypto is being enhanced through strategic partnerships. Financial institutions are beginning to recognize the necessity of stablecoin solutions. Tether’s user base of over 536 million highlights its impact on financial inclusion. Tether’s technology development reflects a long-term vision, with recognition coming after years of groundwork. Banks have opportunities to innovate by adopting advanced technologies like blockchain. The maturity of US Treasuries is vital for stablecoin stability. Institutions need experienced professionals to avoid past mistakes in stablecoin development. A knowledge gap about stablecoins exists between smaller banks and multinational institutions. Stablecoin adoption is inevitable as banks recognize consumer demand for faster, cheaper transactions. Guest intro Paolo Ardoino serves as Chief Executive Officer of Tether, the largest stablecoin by market capitalization with USDT in $187 billion circulation globally. He previously served as Chief Technology Officer at Tether starting in 2017, co-leading the strategy that grew its market cap to $83 billion and solidified its position as a global stablecoin leader. Ardoino also continues as Chief Technology Officer of Bitfinex.

The evolution of stablecoins Stablecoins are becoming essential to the financial system, moving beyond niche status. “Stablecoins are no longer a niche crypto experiment they’re becoming core financial infrastructure today we have 536,000,000 users.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether is launching USAT to provide liquidity access for US users. “A lot of folks that have really wanted to enter the tether ecosystem from the US have been looking for a vehicle to do that and that’s what USAT provides.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of finance will likely involve tokenized deposits and stablecoin transactions. “Eventually you’re just gonna see basically stable coin sandwiches built deposits will be tokenized everything will be moving through stables.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s shift from a stablecoin provider to a technology company reflects its broader vision. “It’s not a stablecoin company tether it’s the stable company so a company that build technology to empower society to remain stable.” – Paolo Ardoino USDT is anticipated to receive reciprocity as legislation changes. “I’m very confident that usdt will receive reciprocity.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s role in the crypto ecosystem Tether is positioned as a key player in the crypto ecosystem, bridging traditional finance and crypto. “I mean you know tether is the most important player in the ecosystem and what we’re doing is building an on ramp to the us capital markets to that system.” – Paolo Ardoino Partnerships and interoperability are facilitating the merger of traditional finance and crypto. “We’re working to make usat interoperable with usdt via a variety of mechanisms whether that be through anchorage or issuer or through pools and exchanges.” – Paolo Ardoino Institutions are recognizing the need for stablecoin solutions as the financial landscape evolves. “As these institutions start to flesh out what this brave new world is gonna look like for them is help them to understand the technology and how it benefits their customers.” – Paolo Ardoino Financial inclusion and Tether’s impact Tether has achieved significant financial inclusion with over 536 million users globally. “Today we have 536,000,000 users across the world so that is the biggest financial inclusion success story in the history of humanity.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s technology was developed over eleven years before gaining widespread recognition. “We built the technology and we sit on it for eleven years before seeing the world recognizing it.” – Paolo Ardoino Banks have a unique opportunity to adopt advanced technology and innovate their products. “I think now the difference is that banks actually can adopt this technology and they can build new amazing products they can have twenty four seven trading they can have in instant settlements at the speed of light.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoin stability and banking opportunities The maturity of US Treasuries is crucial for the stability of stablecoins. “Having us treasuries is not necessarily the holy grail it’s also the maturity you need to have a short term maturity so that you want your treasury to be resilient to the changes also that could be from like interest rates environment.” – Paolo Ardoino New institutions must hire experienced professionals to avoid repeating past mistakes in stablecoin development. “I think it will be important for new institution… to hire people that have long term experience in stablecoins to make sure that they don’t redo the mistakes.” – Paolo Ardoino There is a significant knowledge gap about stablecoins among smaller banks compared to multinational institutions. “If you start going down the the totem pole in terms of just market scale and you’re talking to regionals or super regionals or even communities, I think the knowledge gap begins to widen.” – Paolo Ardoino The inevitability of stablecoin adoption Stablecoin adoption is inevitable as banks recognize consumer demand for faster and cheaper money movement. “I think they’ll slowly start to recognize their consumers are gonna have a demand for these products as well everyone wants to be able to move money at will whenever they want at a very cost effective manner and so you know it’s adoption is inevitable.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins enable 24/7 trading and settlement, enhancing global trade and banking operations. “From an interbank settlement perspective… they can settle over the weekends… it unlocks a lot of wide variety of different manners in which they can engage with the US.” – Paolo Ardoino Technology and societal impact The same underserved populations that struggle with traditional banking also lack access to AI services. “The very same people that cannot afford to have a bank account because they cannot pay 150 per year to make keep a bank account open are the same ones as you said that will not have the ability to purchase a subscription for a prominent ai platform.” – Paolo Ardoino The disparity in access to AI services could lead to significant societal instability. “How society can remain stable if we have the other side of the world so half of the population population of the world they will not become as intelligent so that is a huge risk to the stability of the world and to stability of society.” – Paolo Ardoino Decentralized energy solutions in Africa Decentralized energy solutions are essential for remote villages in Africa due to the lack of centralized infrastructure. “We cannot have centralized energy in africa because you cannot in these these villages are very far apart one way the other you cannot have long distance lines and a nuclear plant.” – Paolo Ardoino Decentralized energy kiosks are providing essential services to over a million users in Africa. “We have 800 kiosks now and 1,000,000 users paying to get these batteries and for them it’s a lifeline.” – Paolo Ardoino Technology should be built to be resilient and distributed, focusing on positive societal impact rather than profit. “We are not actually optimizing for yet another buck we are optimizing for positive impact on society.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of stablecoin integration The integration of stablecoins into the US financial system will be a blend of retail and traditional finance. “I think that Americans will pick up on the idea and concept of stablecoin integration from a retail level… I envision a world in which you’re gonna have access to a stablecoin wallet through your banking UX.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins can improve payroll efficiency and remittance processes for low-wage workers. “With stables… they can pay it almost on a daily basis and that’s a huge unlock for folks especially for folks that are engaged in remittances.” – Paolo Ardoino Predictions for stablecoin adoption and technology Stablecoin adoption will become extremely widespread in the US, blending crypto with traditional finance. “I strongly believe at the end of the day stablecoin adoption will be extremely widespread here domestically and I think that it’ll kind of blend this world of crypto into the traditional financial world in a way that’s you know really positive and leads to tremendous success for both retailers merchants banks and customers alike.” – Paolo Ardoino The user experience in crypto needs to improve for broader adoption, focusing on simplicity for consumers. “One of the main issues that I still see in the industry is user experience… most of the people in the world they don’t have time to understand crypto… they just want a dollar.” – Paolo Ardoino User experience and technology design User experience in technology should be designed to address real needs and problems of users. “The way we build technologies is it needs to be respectful of the actual needs and problems to the people that’s how that are always approached it and and be be helpful and and care about their their struggles and their frictions.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether Gold was created at the right moment, leading to its adoption despite initial skepticism. “USDT tether gold was born in thousand twenty for the first two three years it was like everyone was telling me oh why why you know we have much better products… so why people should care about gold the gold is not moving.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s strategic investments and market dynamics In the event of a black swan occurrence, society will revert to gold before adopting Bitcoin. “If a black black swan event happens in the next few years the world will go back to gold not yet to bitcoin.” – Paolo Ardoino Bitcoin is superior to gold, but we must acknowledge the current limitations of Bitcoin’s market cap. “I believe bitcoin is superior to gold by far but we cannot put our head under the sand we need to look at the type the moment in which we live.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s investment in gold serves as a hedge against economic instability rather than for speculative purposes. “We didn’t invest in gold to speculate on gold we invested in gold as a hedge against the craziness that was happening.” – Paolo Ardoino Tether’s gold position and compliance standards Tether’s gold position is significantly more profitable than many traditional trades. “The big short as a trade i think that you know made 1,000,000,000 in profits that short our gold position is probably 10 times that.” – Paolo Ardoino USAT is compliant because it is one-to-one backed and offers transparency, making it a trusted digital dollar. “The compliance standards are fairly simple right one to one back having the transparency… it’s the first unix compliant product out there it can be used as collateral in trading.” – Paolo Ardoino The future of product integration and compliance The long-term prospects for integration of these products in the marketplace are extremely positive. “I think that long term the prospects for just matriculation throughout the marketplace are are extremely positive and we’re gonna drive those things forward.” – Paolo Ardoino The writing will be on the wall that these products are here to stay, especially under the new compliance standard. “I think that the writing will be on the wall and it’ll be very clear that you know these products are here to stay especially under this new compliance standard.” – Paolo Ardoino Regulatory clarity and future technological coexistence Clear rules for the crypto ecosystem are essential for long-term adoption. “Clear rules of the road for the entire ecosystem is very healthy for long term adoption.” – Paolo Ardoino In ten years, we will see a coexistence of humans, robots, and AI agents, but stability in society is crucial for this to happen. “I think in ten years we are going to see a coexistence of humans robots and a trillion of ai agents… technology is the bond to keep society united stable.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins as a connecting tissue in future technology In ten years, stablecoins will play a crucial role in connecting various technologies and devices. “I believe in ten years we’re going to see our products doing exactly that be supporting people in their day to day lives… we’re going to see stablecoins to connect to be the connecting tissue between a robot, a self driving car, a person, a smart fridge, an intelligent light bulb.” – Paolo Ardoino Stablecoins can transfer both value and information in a single transaction. “The beauty of stablecoins is that we just scratched the surface onto their potential… it can transfer everything; it can create incredible constructs that can be used not only by humans but also by the machines.” – Paolo Ardoino

Drake has never been shy about betting big, but on the eve of Super Bowl LX, the global music star took it up another notch by placing a $1 million wager on the New England Patriots—despite the majority of betting markets lining up against them.

Kyle Samani Slams Hyperliquid Days After Leaving MulticoinSamani steps back from Multicoin as wallets linked to the firm accumulate Hyperliquid’s HYPE.Public criticism of Hyperliquid fuels speculation over internal thesis disagreements.Debate highlights growing ideological split between decentralization and high-performance crypto infrastructure.Kyle Samani stepped down from Multicoin Capital on February 5, 2026, after nearly a decade as co-founder. Today, he is publicly criticizing Hyperliquid (HYPE) as on-chain data shows Multicoin purchased over $40 million in HYPE tokens.

The close timing has fueled speculation that internal conflicts over investment strategy prompted the departure of one of the most notable Solana advocates in the crypto industry.

Multicoin, Hyperliquid, and Kyle Samani: Coincidence or Clash?Samani’s departure announcement on February 5 marked a significant shift for Multicoin Capital, a leading force in institutional crypto investment.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Despite his departure, Samani stated he would remain engaged in cryptocurrency, especially within the Solana ecosystem.

1/ I will remain in my role as Chairman of Forward Industries.

As part of the redemption request that I intend to submit to Multicoin’s Master Fund for March 31, 2026, I will request an in-kind redemption in FWDI shares and warrants rather than in USD, pending Multicoin’s…

— Kyle Samani (@KyleSamani) February 4, 2026 The announcement came only days after MLM analysts flagged wallets believed to be linked to Multicoin accumulating large amounts of Hyperliquid’s HYPE token in late January.

They highlighted purchases totalling tens of millions of dollars. Additional analysis suggests that substantial ETH flows were rotated into HYPE over several days via intermediary wallets.

Looks like wallets linked to Multicoin Capital are rotating a large amount of ETH into HYPE.

Since January 22, wallets sent 87.1K ETH ($220M) to a Multicoin-linked Galaxy Digital deposit address. On January 23, one day after the first deposit, a Multicoin-linked wallet started… https://t.co/LrJyoCTQ3m

— MLM (@mlmabc) February 4, 2026 Notably, no official confirmation has linked the trades directly to Multicoin’s internal strategy decisions.

Today, February 8, just three days after his formal exit, Samani is criticizing Hyperliquid on social media, making his position unmistakably clear.

“Hyperliquid is, in most respects, everything wrong with crypto. The founder literally fled his home country to build Openly, which facilitates crime and terror. Closed source Permissioned,” wrote Samani in a post.

This strong criticism stands in direct contrast to Multicoin’s high-profile investment in HYPE tokens. As a result, observers wondered if Samani’s views clashed with the firm’s recent decisions, helping drive his exit.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Solana Investment Philosophy Versus HYPE StrategyMulticoin Capital earned its reputation as a vocal backer of Solana. In September 2025, the firm led a $1.65 billion private investment into Forward Industries, working with Jump Crypto and Galaxy Digital to create what they called “the world’s leading Solana treasury company.”

Samani was named Chairman of Forward Industries’ Board, underlining his importance to Multicoin’s Solana focus.

The Solana investment strategy centered on transparent yields through staking, DeFi protocols, and capital efficiency. Multicoin highlighted Solana’s infrastructure as offering better economics than Bitcoin treasury models, citing native yields of 8.05% as of September 2025.

The firm also released research on Solana projects like Jito, which by March 2025 powered over 94% of all Solana stake via custom block production technology.

Hyperliquid, meanwhile, represents a contrasting approach. The platform is a decentralized perpetual futures exchange with its own blockchain.

It is popular for high leverage and low fees, but faces criticism for its centralized validator system, closed-source code, and regulatory risks. These features appear to oppose the principles Samani promoted at Multicoin.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Tensions between strategies became more evident as analysts speculated about internal dynamics.

“Does this mean that they couldn’t buy HYPE as long as Kyle was running the fund, which is why his leaving coincides with Multicoin buying a lot of HYPE?” wrote one user.

Kyle Samani did not immediately respond to BeInCrypto’s request for comment.

Supporters Defend Hyperliquid as Samani’s Exit Sparks Ideological DebateSome investors and traders pushed back strongly against Samani’s criticism. They argue that Hyperliquid represents a return to crypto’s original principles rather than a departure from them.

Hyperliquid is in most respects everything wrong with crypto

> Rejected VC capital
> Democratized MMing via HLP
> Enriched community via largest token airdrop ever ($9B)
> Instead of pocketing some or all of the $960M revenue HL has made, put them all into buybacks of said token https://t.co/XVk2NEDeyG

— steven.hl (@stevenyuntcap) February 8, 2026 Hyperliquid’s decision to direct revenue toward token buybacks and community incentives reflects a model designed to more closely align users and infrastructure than many venture-backed projects.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The divide highlights a deeper ideological split emerging within crypto markets. On one side are investors who prioritize transparency, decentralization, and community ownership as defining principles.

On the other hand, there are those who champion performance, liquidity depth, and institutional-grade infrastructure, even when those systems require trade-offs in governance or architecture.

If you're wondering who the marginal buyer will be at $20 billion, remember that

– HL is faster than Solana

– Has a better UX than Drift

– Its present value of future MEV is in the trillions

Hyperliquid is the culmination of all of Multicoin Capital's thought leadership. And…

— Kunal G (@kunalgoel) November 29, 2024 Samani’s departure itself has not been formally tied to any specific investment decision. Neither Multicoin nor Samani has publicly stated that Hyperliquid or portfolio positioning played any role in the transition.

Sometimes, leadership changes at venture firms often stem from long-term strategic shifts, personal decisions, or fund-structure considerations that may not be visible externally.

Still, the timing has proven difficult for markets to ignore. In crypto, an industry where narratives travel quickly, the combination of on-chain transparency and social media speculation often fills gaps left by limited official disclosures.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price Performance. Source: TradingView Meanwhile, the HYPE token is nurturing a recovery, with a higher low on the 4-hour timeframe, suggesting a trend reversal if buyer momentum sustains.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Journalist

Posted: February 9, 2026

Cardano [ADA] was in the news recently when it was reported that the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) will support ADA Futures products starting Monday, 09 February.  Alongside Cardano, Chainlink [LINK], and Stellar [XLM] would also be part of the CME’s crypto products.

The news came at a time when the crypto market was in turmoil. In fact, Bitcoin [BTC] has shed nearly 30% since 15 January, while Cardano has posted losses of 34% since then.

The bulls managed to defend the major support level at $0.267, for now. Can the CME news sustain this bounce?

Long-term trend does not favor Cardano buyers

Source: ADA/USDT on TradingView

The weekly structure was firmly bearish, and has been since October. The loss of the $0.53 support zone, which had been important in the first half of 2025, was a huge blow. At the time of writing, another key support at $0.246 had been tested.

A recent AMBCrypto report had noted that the $0.22-$0.27 area has served as a long-term Cardano demand zone since late 2022. The weekly timeframe saw a wick to $0.22 in the first week of June 2023, marking the lows bulls do not want to see invalidated.

Forecasting the next play – Will the short-term bounce continue or fizzle out?

Source: ADA/USDT on TradingView

The bullish divergence between the RSI and the price has nearly finished playing out. The 78.6% retracement level at $0.287 is likely to be tested briefly before ADA resumes its longer-term downtrend.

Traders’ call to action – Sell? It is feasible to go short upon a retest of $0.287, targeting $0.22, with invalidation above the local high at $0.305. For long-term investors, there is no hurry to buy at the market bottom. Especially since it can take weeks and months to form.

Traders should be aware of the possibility of a liquidity hunt beyond $0.3, especially if Bitcoin climbs past $74k to push towards $80k. In this scenario, the $0.33-$0.35 supply zone should be the ceiling of the rally.

Final Thoughts Cardano has a long-term bearish bias, and the short-term bullish momentum divergence has nearly finished playing out. Fibonacci retracement levels presented a short trade setup targeting the $0.22 lows. Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Akashnath S is a Senior Journalist and Technical Analysis expert at AMBCrypto. He specializes in dissecting price action, identifying key market trends through advanced chart patterns, and forecasting both short-term and long-term asset trajectories. His distinct analytical method is grounded in his academic training as a Chemical Engineer. This background provides him with a systematic, process-oriented approach to market data, enabling him to analyze the complex dynamics of financial markets with precision and objectivity. Having actively covered the cryptocurrency space since the landmark 2017 market cycle, Akashnath possesses years of experience navigating both bull and bear markets. This seasoned perspective is critical to his insightful reporting on market volatility and evolution. As an active market participant, Akashnath enhances his analysis with crucial, hands-on experience. This practical application of his technical skills ensures his insights are not merely theoretical, but are also relevant and actionable for an audience looking to understand and navigate trading opportunities. He is dedicated to educating readers on the nuances of technical analysis, empowering them with the knowledge to make more informed financial decisions.

TLDR: Canton Network processes $350 billion in daily repo transactions across over 600 validator nodes globally  DTCC tokenizing U.S. Treasuries on Canton with SEC approval, targeting MVP launch in first half of 2026  JPMorgan’s Kinexys announced plans to issue JPM Coin deposit token natively on Canton Network in January  Platform carries over $6 trillion in tokenized real-world assets with privacy features for regulated firms
Canton Network has emerged as a major institutional blockchain infrastructure, processing $350 billion in daily repo transactions.

The Layer 1 blockchain carries over $6 trillion in tokenized real-world assets across more than 600 validator nodes.

Major financial institutions, including JPMorgan, DTCC, Goldman Sachs, and Franklin Templeton, have deployed production systems on the network.

The platform handles over 700,000 daily transactions while maintaining privacy requirements for regulated financial institutions.

Privacy-First Architecture for Regulated Finance Canton Network operates as a Layer 1 blockchain designed specifically for financial institutions moving real-world assets on-chain.

Digital Asset built the platform around privacy between counterparties, rapid settlement, and native compliance features.

Traditional public blockchains display every transaction to all network participants, creating legal obstacles for banks required to maintain client confidentiality.

Delphi Digital noted that “$350 billion a day settles on a blockchain many people have never heard of.” The network solves privacy challenges through DAML smart contracts that embed access and authorization rules directly into assets and transactions.

Two firms can complete trades without exposing details to outside parties. Regulators maintain necessary access while other network participants cannot view unrelated activity.

Settlement happens atomically, eliminating the multi-day clearing processes common on traditional financial rails. Both sides of trades execute simultaneously, removing windows where one party has delivered while the other has not.

According to the analysis, “there is no window where one party has delivered, and the other hasn’t,” eliminating risk categories in repo markets where hundreds of billions move daily.

The platform enables different financial applications to interact natively across the network. A tokenized treasury on one platform can serve as collateral on another platform within a single transaction.

Cross-application settlement between regulated institutions occurs without central intermediaries, a capability not previously demonstrated at this scale.

Production Deployments from Major Institutions Daily repo volumes reached $350 billion in recent months, up from $280 billion in August 2025. Broadridge operates its entire Distributed Ledger Repo platform on the network as the first major live deployment. Banks and institutions use repo markets to borrow short-term against Treasury collateral.

DTCC is tokenizing U.S. Treasury securities on Canton Network, backed by SEC No-Action Letter approval. The project targets an MVP release in the first half of 2026 with broader rollout planned for later that year.

DTCC joined the Canton Foundation as co-chair alongside Euroclear. As observers emphasized, this is “not a test. Not a pilot.”

Franklin Templeton expanded its tokenized fund platform to the network, joining Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, and Deutsche Börse.

JPMorgan’s blockchain unit Kinexys announced plans to issue JPM Coin, its USD deposit token, natively on Canton Network in January.

Fireblocks subsequently integrated the platform and became a Super Validator, providing regulated custody for institutional clients.

The validator network includes HexTrust and Tharimmune, the first NASDAQ-listed company operating as a super validator. These regulated firms run production systems processing real transactions under regulatory oversight.

The network lacks public block explorers, reflecting its institutional focus. As noted, “Canton was not built for retail. It was built for the firms that move your money.”

Journalist

Posted: February 8, 2026

The last few weeks have seenn crypto markets fall across the board. This has left many analysts and market participants wondering what may be the cause. While the crash might just be the product of a normal bear market, speculations have continue to pile up.

Recent allegations by Jim Cramer on CNBC’s Squawk Box have triggered market attention too.

What did Jim Cramer say? After Bitcoin‘s price fell below the realized price of $79.1k, it was termed as a rare “Black Swan” event. However, Jim Cramer looked at the move to $60k with optimism. On an episode of CNBC Live’s Squawk Box, Jim Cramer said that the U.S government is now buying Bitcoin. According to the analyst,

“I heard at $60k he’s gonna fill the Bitcoin Reserve you better cover.”

For its part, the crypto community did not take the rumour mongering seriously, with some labeling Cramer as a joker.

Some even claimed that he might be confusing Strategic Reserve and Strategic Holdings. Given the absence of established rules for the Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, the latter might just be more plausible.

Here, it’s worth pointing out that Cramer’s assertion also lacks on-chain backing. Needless to say though, the statement led to many looking at the market differently.

A hike in market confidence? For instance, the odds of a potential rate cut for the 18 March FOMC meeting rose by 5%. As per data from CME Group, the probability climbed from 18% to 23.2% during the weekend.

Usually, such growth is illustrative of confidence among traders and investors. This is because they can borrow more to pour into risk-on assets for lower interest pay. The result is bullish for Bitcoin and the rest of crypto.

Source: CME Group

However, the figures were still very low, suggesting that a rate cut decision remains difficult. In the past, when they went through, the probability was in the 80th percentile or more.

That brings us to the big question – Do these allegations lend more weight to the significance of BTC’s $60K-level?

Any key levels to watch? Bitcoin’s price charts revealed an aggressive bounce after hitting $60,000. The importance of the zone was proven by the association with the U.S government buying price at a psychological level.

Moreover, this order-block zone initiated the rally that saw BTC hit a high of $126k in 2025. Also, it was the nearest bullish liquidity swing.

Source: BTC/USD on TradingView

However, the RSI divergence indicator indicated that bear pressure was still present. This increased the likelihood of breaking below this zone.

On the contrary, the Bitcoin Mayer Multiple hit a value of 0.6. This implied that BTC was undervalued, and a bounce could be on the cards. This finding seemed to be perfectly aligned with expectations of upside from the world’s largest crypto.

Source: CryptoQuant

While it did not affirm a price bottom, it hinted that the risk approach might be changing as the markets absorbs fear.

Such episodes happened during bear markets’ bottoms in December 2018, March 2020, and November 2022. Each time, a strong rebound followed suit.

Final Thoughts Jim Cramer believes that the U.S government bought Bitcoin at $60,000. Bitcoin seems to be trading above a reversal point as the crypto market absorbed panic over the last few weeks. 

18h05 ▪ 4 min read ▪ by Fenelon L.

Summarize this article with:

Bitcoin tries to catch its breath after a spectacular plunge. Fallen to 59,930 dollars, the king of cryptos is trying today a difficult return around 70,000 $. However, is this recovery sustainable or is it just a respite before the next shock?

In brief Bitcoin trades at $70,854 on February 8, 2026, after a dizzying 37% drop from its highs. Moving averages and MACD show decidedly bearish signals across all time frames. US Bitcoin ETFs show signs of stabilization with $330.7M inflows on Friday, led by BlackRock. Bitcoin tries to restart after a major correction The bitcoin price is currently oscillating within a narrow range between $68,443 and $70,976. This volatility hides a harsh reality: the asset has just suffered a 37% collapse at the beginning of the year. Liquidations exceeding one billion dollars fueled this bearish spiral. Institutional investors massively reduced their positions, creating a gaping void in demand.

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: Bitstamp The technical analysis leaves little room for optimism. All moving averages, whether simple or exponential, point downwards. The daily chart draws a succession of lower highs and lows. The MACD remains firmly anchored in the red.

BTC/USD 4-hour chart. Source: Bitstamp The only positive point: the hourly chart shows ascending lows between $67,313 and $71,673, suggesting that some opportunistic buyers are returning.

The key resistance is at $71,673. A clear break above this level could open the way to $74,000, or even $79,000. However, the opposite is just as likely. Failure to stay above $68,000 would bring the price back towards the $60,000 support. Traders watch every move with the nervousness of those who have already burned their fingers.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs offer a valuable indicator of institutional sentiment. Last Friday, they recorded $330.7 million inflows after three days of net outflows totaling $1.25 billion. 

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust led the way with $231.6 million. However, this lull does not dispel the worries. On Thursday, the same ETF had set a record with $10 billion in trading volume, accompanied by a 13% drop.

The market shifts into a structural bearish phase CryptoQuant sounded the alarm in early February. The break of the 365-day moving average, observed recently for the first time since March 2022, officially marks the entry into a prolonged bear market. 

Since this break about 83 days ago, Bitcoin has fallen 23%. This drop is faster and more violent than the one observed during the 2022 bear phase.

On-chain indicators confirm this gloomy diagnosis. CryptoQuant’s “Bull Market” index shows zero. The growth of stablecoin supply is negative, revealing a contraction in available liquidity. 

Coinbase premium remains in the red, a sign that American investors no longer actively support prices. Trading volumes collapse. No inverse capitulation signal appears on the horizon.

The macroeconomic context doesn’t help. High interest rates maintained by the Federal Reserve weigh on all risky assets. Bitcoin no longer enjoys its status as a decoupled asset from traditional markets. Institutions that had massively accumulated in 2025 have stopped buying. Some are even selling. This institutional disaffection amplifies the bearish pressure.

Bitcoin is at a critical turning point. Bulls bet on a decisive break of $75,000 to reverse the trend. Bears consider this rebound just a flash before a return to $60,000. Are we witnessing the beginnings of a prolonged bear market?

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Fenelon L.

Passionné par le Bitcoin, j'aime explorer les méandres de la blockchain et des cryptos et je partage mes découvertes avec la communauté. Mon rêve est de vivre dans un monde où la vie privée et la liberté financière sont garanties pour tous, et je crois fermement que Bitcoin est l'outil qui peut rendre cela possible.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Despite London's cooling luxury market, crypto leader Stani Kulechov snaps up a £22 million mansion.

Stani Kulechov, founder of decentralized finance protocol Aave, has purchased a five-story Victorian mansion in London for around £22 million (worth approximately $30 million).

This is one of the city’s priciest residential deals over the past year, according to Bloomberg.

Kulechov’s London Buy The property is located in the upscale Notting Hill area, which was acquired in November at roughly £2 million below its initial asking price, shortly before the UK’s autumn budget. The transaction stood out against a cooling luxury housing market, which has been weighed down by higher stamp duties and policy changes introduced under the Labour government, including the rollback of tax advantages for wealthy foreign residents.

Data from property research firm LonRes revealed that sales of homes priced above £5 million slowed significantly toward the end of last year. It remains unclear whether any digital assets were used in the purchase.

Kulechov founded Aave in 2017 under its original name, ETHLend, which was later rebranded as Aave. In 2023, the company behind Aave briefly adopted the Avara umbrella brand to manage multiple Web3 initiatives. Aave has grown into one of the largest DeFi lending platforms. Beyond lending, Kulechov has been involved in several crypto initiatives, including the GHO stablecoin and consumer-facing blockchain products. He had also publicly expressed support for the UK as a potential hub for crypto innovation.

Brand Overhaul The purchase comes as Aave Labs is narrowing its focus to its core lending business. Earlier this month, the company said it would shut down the Avara umbrella brand, which previously grouped several Web3 projects, including the Family crypto wallet and the Lens decentralized social platform.

Under the change, all products will operate solely under the Aave Labs name, including the Aave mobile app, Aave Pro, and Aave Kit. The company said that the main objective behind the move is to simplify its brand and concentrate resources on growing the Aave protocol and expanding its user base.

You may also like: These Popular Altcoins Lost the Most in the Last 24 Hours: What You Need to Know Report: Aave Power Struggle Triggers $500M Market Cap Slide Ripple Notches Major Regulatory Victory From the UK’s FCA: Details The decision also follows ongoing questions around control within the DeFi ecosystem. The Aave DAO, governed by AAVE token holders, manages the protocol’s smart contracts and on-chain revenue, while Aave Labs controls the official website, branding, and other off-chain assets.

Tensions emerged last year after the company made changes to the official interface that redirected certain fees away from the DAO treasury. A community proposal to take control of Aave Labs’ intellectual property later failed, though discussions around revenue sharing and branding continue.

Tags:

It was a rough week for crypto.

Crowd favorites Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] both slipped, posting weekly losses of around 10% and 13%. However, while the majors struggled, not every coin moved in the same direction.

Grab your coffee, and here’s a look at the biggest winners and losers in crypto this week.

A volatile week for Memecore [M] Memecore [M] had a choppy week, with wide price swings rather than a clean trend. After slipping to a weekly low near $1.28, the token made its way back up, going up about 23% to around $1.58. That bounce pushed prices close to the $1.9 zone before sellers stepped back in.

Source: TradingView

At the time of writing, M was trading near $1.57, giving up part of those gains and closing the latest session down roughly 15% on the day. Despite the pullback, the recovery from the lows showed buyers were active at cheaper levels.

With pace looking slow for now (with price settling around the middle of its recent range and indicators like RSI close to 50), neither side is fully in control yet.

MYX Finance [MYX] holds while the market finds its feet MYX Finance [MYX] had a steadier week compared to its peers, managing to stay on the front foot while markets bounced back. The token climbed from around $5.40 earlier in the week to about $6.44 at press time – A gain of roughly 18% from the local lows. Prices briefly tested the $6.8-$7.0 zone before cooling off.

But importantly, MYX managed to hold above the $6.5 area for most of the week.

Daily performance was modest, with the latest session closing up about 1.4%. Strength indicators remained healthy, so all’s stable on the MYX front… for now.

Midnight [NIGHT] fights back after a rough slide Midnight [NIGHT] had a mixed week, with a short-lived recovery after a steady drop. The token fell to a weekly low near $0.046 before buyers stepped in, pushing prices up to around $0.054-$0.055. That move caused a rebound of roughly 17% from the lows.

However, the momentum didn’t fully stick.

At press time, NIGHT was trading near $0.0537, with the latest session closing down about 2.2% on the day. The price spent much of the week moving sideways after the bounce. Strength remained fairly balanced, with RSI at around 47. While NIGHT appears to be stabilizing, there seems to be a lack of confident direction.

Weekly losers Binance [BNB] takes a big fall Binance [BNB] had a rough week, with sellers firmly in control for most of the move. The token dropped from the $760-$770 region to a weekly low near $600; a decline of roughly 15% at its worst.

The fall happened during a clear rise in trading volume during the decline.

Source: TradingView

At press time, BNB was trading around $643, well below last week’s levels. The price spent the latter part of the week moving sideways, so sell pressure has calmed but the belief hasn’t returned.

RSI was near 26, showing BNB remains deeply oversold, while DMI indicated that the downside control remains firmly intact.

Monero [XMR] slipped lower with persistent sell pressure Monero [XMR] took a tough beating in the last few days, staying under pressure with little room for a rebound. The token slid 20% from the $400 region to a weekly low near $290. A small bounce followed, but it lacked strength.

At press time, XMR was trading around $325.7, down about 1.1% on the day. There was weak pace, with RSI near 33. While XMR looked to be stabilizing, the fall appeared to have dashed traders’ faith in the privacy coin.

The ZCash [ZEC] downtrend continues Zcash [ZEC] had another weak week! The token fell from the $290-$300 range to a weekly low close to $200, a drop of just over 30% at its worst. Buyers did step in near those lows, helping ZEC recover slightly.

At press time, ZEC was trading around $234, down about 2.7% on the day. Still, the rebound lacked follow-through, and prices struggled to move meaningfully higher. RSI was near 32, and money flow also stayed negative.

Wrapping up… Some tokens tried their best, some face-planted, and others just stood there pretending nothing happened. If there’s one takeaway, it’s that the market is still moody, selective, and absolutely not taking instructions from anyone.

As always, this isn’t a shopping list. DYOR, double-check the numbers, and don’t let one green candle persuade you as quickly as it can fall.

Same time next week. Bring snacks.

Final Thoughts Bitcoin and Ethereum’s double-digit weekly losses set the tone, but selective buying kept some of the market alive. Confidence and belief is driving crypto right now.

In brief Pudgy Penguins is hosting a pop-up Valentine's Day event in New York City this week. The crypto-native brand is selling a plush bouquet at the event, with an online offering already sold out. The Pudgy Penguins team plans to expand the V-Day event internationally next year. The Pudgy Penguins team is helping fans celebrate Valentine’s Day in the real world with Pudgy Petals, a three-day immersive pop-up event in New York City that highlights gifting and connection via its colorful characters.

Running February 12-14, the activation invites guests into the love story of Polly and Pengu (aka Pax), core characters in the Pudgy Penguins universe. The team told Decrypt that the brand—which has expanded from NFTs to games, real-world toys, and beyond—is using Valentine’s Day as a cultural entry point to continue to translate its internet-native IP into a broader brand.

At the center of the pop-up is the Pudgy Penguins Plush Bouquet ($49.99), an alternative to traditional flowers. The bouquet features plush characters and soft textures designed to last well beyond the holiday. An online drop of the bouquet has already sold out, but it will also be available at the pop-up.

Pengu and Polly are taking over NYC this Valentine's Day!

Join us at our Pudgy Petals pop-up store from February 12-14 for a celebration of our Valentine's Day collection, love, and all things Pudgy. pic.twitter.com/EJUszK6jwb

— Pudgy Penguins (@pudgypenguins) February 6, 2026

“The Plushie Bouquet marks our first Valentine’s Day expression,” Pudgy Penguins Director of Business Development Steve Starobinsky told Decrypt. “The item is intentionally positioned as a long-lasting symbol of companionship designed to be kept and revisited rather than discarded after a few days like traditional flowers or candy. This item embodies our aim of creating new rituals of affection rooted in meaning rather than tradition.”

The event includes on-site bouquet customization with flash tattoos, free aura readings, and couples photo booths. There will also be pink and blue matcha drinks and treats outside the space.

The Pudgy Penguins Valentine's Plush Bouquet. Image: Pudgy PenguinsThe programming will shift slightly each day. Thursday, February 12, aligns with both New York Fashion Week and the New York Toy Fair, tapping into a creative crowd already circulating downtown Manhattan. Friday, February 13, is branded as Polly’s Galentine’s, with a focus on friendship and groups. And Saturday, February 14, centers on couples and classic Valentine’s moments, leaning fully into the holiday vibe.

“Every detail of the pop-up is intentionally designed to encourage guests to linger, participate, document the experience, and share it socially,” Starobinsky said. “The space will be inviting and joyful, for all those who join the fun.”

Beyond the Valentine’s theme, Pudgy Petals represents a broader brand evolution. Pudgy Penguins, which began as an internet-native phenomenon and NFT project, is continuing its shift into physical retail and experiential spaces that require no familiarity with crypto. The pop-up prioritizes emotional storytelling and accessibility, rather than technology.

“We are a four-quadrant brand appealing to adults and kids, women and men, with categories such as toys, gifting, lifestyle, and experiential retail drawing people in,” Starobinsky added.

The timing of the activation is equally strategic, with Starobinsky noting that the overlap with those other NYC events puts “Pudgy Penguins at the intersection of fashion, toys, pop culture, and retail innovation.” And it won’t be the last V-Day event, he said.

“Pudgy Petals is not a one-time activation,” Starobinsky added. “We are going to expand this pop-up globally in 2027, leveraging it to launch more product capsules for this holiday.”

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

The cryptocurrency community has unleashed a torrent of mockery and defiance against the Financial Times following the publication of a scathing opinion piece declaring that Bitcoin is effectively worthless.

The article, penned by FT columnist Jemima Kelly and titled "Bitcoin is still about $70,000 too high," argues that the leading cryptocurrency is destined to hit zero. 

Kelly compares Bitcoin holders to the protagonist of the French film La Haine, a man falling from a skyscraper who comforts himself on the way down by repeating "so far, so good," before inevitably splattering on the ground.

HOT Stories

The 'bottom signal'For veteran market participants, mainstream media declaring Bitcoin "dead" is often interpreted as a contrarian indicator that the bottom is in.

"NOW we can confidently say Bitcoin's bottom has been reached. When outdated, incompetent, arrogant media start posting...is when Bitcoin starts flying," a user wrote on X. 

You Might Also Like

The sentiment was echoed by other industry commentators. "The FT calling Bitcoin dead? Very bullish," he stated. 

Other reactions were more visceral, targeting the Financial Times' declining influence and relevance in the digital age.

User Bram Kanstein mocked the publication's inability to grasp the asset class, sarcastically cheering them on: "Fading the most profound technological discovery of your industry, well done!!"

Others expressed disbelief that such hardline skepticism still exists in 2026, writing, "I can't believe people still write things like this."

Both IEI and MUB are top ETFs for bond market exposure. But MUB's tax exemptions may be of strong interest for investors.

Offering exposure to the fixed-income market, the iShares National Muni Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:MUB) and iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF (NASDAQ:IEI) both have a strong portfolio of government bonds. This comparison highlights how each fund stacks up on cost, yield, performance, and risk.

Snapshot (cost & size)MetricMUBIEIIssueriSharesISharesExpense ratio0.05%0.15%1-yr return (as of Feb. 7, 2026)0.59%2.61%Dividend yield3.13%3.51%Beta0.250.15AUM$42.61 billion$17.89 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

IEI has a higher annual fee but delivers a modestly higher yield and one-year return than MUB. But because MUB holds over 70 times more assets in its portfolio, it’s a broader investment with a higher AUM.

Performance & risk comparisonMetricMUBIEIMax drawdown (5 y)-11.88%-13.89%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$916$898What's insideIEI holds 87 positions focused exclusively on U.S. Treasury bonds that mature in three to seven years, providing pure government exposure with minimal credit risk. The fund is nearly two decades old and holds AA-rated bonds, the second-best rating.

MUB spreads its assets across more than 6,000 investment-grade municipal bonds, with most of its holdings in bonds issued by state and local governments, unlike IEI, which focuses more on federally issued bonds. Interest earned from this ETF is exempt from U.S. income tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investorsOver the last 12 months and throughout its existence, IEI’s price has performed better and with lower risk, with 100% of its holdings being federally-backed bonds. However, one can’t ignore MUB’s tax exemptions.

While AMT taxes generally apply to high-income investors, not having to pay income tax on interest means investors do not have to pay the IRS on the interest they earn. However, the ETF is not exempt from state taxes, so investors should check with their local state to see how taxes apply.

Another potential advantage for MUB is that, by design, it should be more volatile because it holds no federal bonds and consists of lower-rated assets than IEI.

This comes with risk, as lower ratings increase the likelihood of default by bond issuers. But if investors are willing to take on the risk, the increased volatility and tax exemptions may make MUB an option to consider.

NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired BellRing securities between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BRBR.

BellRing Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose materially adverse facts. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that:
      (1)   the Defendants failed to disclose to investors that its strong sales results did not reflect increased end-consumer demands or brand momentum;
      (2)   rather, customers accumulated excess inventory as a safeguard against product shortages that had previously constrained BellRing’s supply;
      (3)   once customers gained confidence that product shortages were a thing of the past, they promptly reduced their inventory by selling through existing products and cutting back on new orders; and
      (4)   following the destocking, the Company admitted that competitive pressures were materially weakening demand.

What's Next for BellRing Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BRBR. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in BellRing you have until March 23, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to BellRing Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for BellRing Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 8, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of American Depositary Shares ("ADS") of Mereo BioPharma Group plc (NASDAQ: MREO) between June 5, 2023, and December 26, 2025. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 6, 2026 in the securities class action first filed by the Firm.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Mereo BioPharma Group securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Mereo BioPharma Group class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52452 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 6, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of the Phase 3 ORBIT and COSMIC programs; neither of which hit its primary endpoints of reducing annualized clinical fracture rate compared to the placebo or bisphosphonate control groups, respectively. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Mereo BioPharma Group class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52452 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/283128

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired F5 securities between October 28, 2024 and October 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/FFIV.

F5 Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
      (1)   Defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of F5’s security capabilities;
      (2)   F5 was not, in fact, equipped to safely secure data for its clients because the Company was, at all relevant times, experiencing a significant security breach (the “Security Breach”) affecting key product offerings;
      (3)   The revelation of the Security Breach would significantly impair F5’s ability to capitalize on opportunities in the security market; and
      (4)   As a result of the omission of these material facts, shareholders purchased F5 securities at artificially inflated prices.

What's Next for F5 Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/FFIV. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in F5 you have until February 17, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to F5 Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for F5 Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (NASDAQ: RARE) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Ultragenyx securities between August 3, 2023 and December 26, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/RARE.

Ultragenyx Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
      (1)   defendants created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to the effects of setrusumab on patients with variable types of Osteogenesis Imperfecta (“OI”), while also minimizing risk that patients in Ultragenyx’ Phase III Orbit study would fail to achieve a statistically significant reduction in annualized fracture rate (“AFR”), such that the second interim analysis could be performed and presented to the investing public; and
      (2)   in truth, Ultragenyx’ optimism in the Phase III Orbit study’s results and interim analysis benchmark were misplaced because Ultragenyx failed to convey the risk associated with basing such threshold figures on Phase II results that had no placebo control group for appropriate comparison and thus had not ruled out that the reduction in AFR from that study could merely be triggered by an increased standard of care and the placebo effect of being provided a novel treatment.

What's Next for Ultragenyx Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/RARE. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Ultragenyx you have until April 6, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Ultragenyx Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Ultragenyx Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Feb. 08, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against China Liberal Education Holdings Ltd. (OTCMKTS: CLEUF) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired China Liberal securities between January 22, 2025 and January 30, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CLEUF.

China Liberal Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:

(1) In January 2025, individuals impersonating investment advisors on social media platforms fraudulently induced investors to purchase shares of China Liberal stock, artificially inflating (“pumping”) the price of China Liberal shares; 
(2) On January 30, 2025, the price of China Liberal stock abruptly collapsed, causing many investors to lose nearly all of the funds they had invested as a result of the scheme; 
(3) Although several individuals responsible for the coordinated pump‑and‑dump scheme are now being prosecuted by the United States Department of Justice, there is evidence indicating that executives at China Liberal may have known of, participated in, or acted with severe recklessness regarding the fraudulent conduct; and 
(4) As a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

What's Next for China Liberal Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CLEUF. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in China Liberal you have until March 31, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to China Liberal Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for China Liberal Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

SoundHound AI is taking the restaurant world by storm, but further growth may be much more difficult.

There's no shortage of artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, from AI-powered defense systems to agentic AI platforms and more.

One of the most unique AI pure plays, though, is SoundHound AI (SOUN +16.94%), which is developing a voice AI platform that fuses large language model (LLM) AI and audio recognition technology into a customer service AI agent barely distinguishable from a human (at least, that's the idea).

It's a worthy goal, but there are some big hurdles standing in SoundHound's way. So big, in fact, that you may want to forget SoundHound AI and opt instead for a colossus AI stock that truly owns its data. Here's why.

Image source: Getty Images.

SoundHound's opportunity If you've ever interacted with a prerecorded voice menu system, you know how frustrating automated customer service interactions can be. They leave most of us just pressing the buttons we hope will get us to a real person. In other words, SoundHound has identified a real need for a system that can actually understand what a caller wants and provide answers in natural-sounding, conversational speech.

One of the challenges SoundHound's AI system seems to have successfully overcome is recognizing voices when there's lots of background noise. As a result, restaurants like White Castle have deployed its systems to speed up drive-thru ordering. SoundHound claims its restaurant voice ordering platform is 32% more accurate than human employees, provides 85% faster service times, and offers cost savings of $58,000 per location per year. The company has parlayed this restaurant technology into phone ordering for Five Guys and Red Lobster.

But to really jump-start its growth, SoundHound needs to expand beyond restaurant ordering into customer service lines of all types. The company's Amelia 7 AI customer service agent has already been picked up by some companies, largely in the insurance and financial sectors, but there's obviously a huge untapped market for similar AI agents from businesses of all types.

Image source: Getty Images.

Outside the niche The problem for SoundHound is that none of the individual technologies it's using are new or unique. AI voice assistants like Apple's Siri, voice recognition software, and LLM-powered AI chatbots are everywhere and consistently improving in quality. To succeed, SoundHound will have to hope that another company with an edge in one of these areas doesn't offer a competing product, because it doesn't have much of a moat.

That puts SoundHound on a bit of a time crunch to develop a cross-industry agentic voice AI that's roughly as capable as a human operator. That means it must understand what the customer wants, reliably provide accurate information and solutions, and above all, not take too long to generate a response. That's pretty easy for restaurant ordering, which involves a set list of menu items. It's pretty difficult for a generic help line where there are any number of possible issues a customer might bring up.

And where is SoundHound going to get customer interaction data to train its AI? It seems unlikely that even millions of restaurant order transcripts could adequately train an agentic AI on how to address, say, a question about why a car engine is making a funny noise.

That potential lack of AI training data seems like a big long-term problem for SoundHound. It probably can't afford to pay a third party for LLM access, since it's already unprofitable and cash-flow-negative, and has been relying on costly acquisitions for growth. The company's share count has more than doubled over the last three years as it has diluted existing shares to raise capital.

Today's Change

(

16.94

%) $

1.25

Current Price

$

8.60

All that makes me very wary of SoundHound's long-term prospects. Luckily, there is a stock you can buy that actually does own all the AI data it needs, and then some.

Alexa, what stock should I buy? Yep, that company is Amazon (AMZN 5.49%). The e-commerce titan was a pioneer in the voice assistant space with its Alexa chatbot. The company also has plenty of AI experience, continually integrating AI features into its Amazon Web Services cloud platform.

Last year, Amazon debuted the AI-enhanced Alexa+. In doing so, it also changed its privacy policy, forcing all users to allow their conversations with Alexa to be uploaded to the cloud for analysis and potential AI training. In Amazon's defense, it would be practically impossible to offer an AI-powered voice assistant without allowing user queries to be processed in the cloud, given AI's massive data usage requirements.

Image source: Amazon.

That means that Amazon now owns a vast trove of AI voice assistant training data, which -- according to some users -- has already made Alexa+ able to respond more quickly and accurately to queries. In other words, Amazon already owns an agentic voice AI, the means to train it on all manner of queries, voice recognition software, a cloud platform on which those queries can be processed, and a boatload of cash at its disposal to pursue whatever opportunities it wants.

True, Amazon hasn't indicated any plans to get into the AI chatbot business anytime soon, but it could easily do so at pretty much any time using already-developed resources it has at the ready. That should strike fear into the heart of any SoundHound investor.

This is one of many companies that are seeing a rebirth with the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence.

Plenty of investors recently have piled into AI stocks without having much sense of the companies in which they're investing. What's particularly surprising about the AI revolution is that for the most part, you haven't yet seen new companies really emerge as the leaders of this new advance in technology. Instead, many of the same companies that powered past technological advances, such as the internet and even the personal computer, have stepped up to the plate to take their swing at the AI opportunity.

During the month of February, the Voyager Portfolio is investigating some of the most popular companies in the market to figure out what's behind their success. The technology industry is full of stories of founders getting off the ground in the most unusual of ways, but the story that Micron Technology (MU +3.17%) has followed is even more interesting than most. This first article in my three-part series on Micron will look more closely at how this maker of vital memory chips for AI hardware got to where it is today.

Image source: Getty Images.

Open wide Micron began its existence in the basement of a dental office in Boise, Idaho in 1978. The goal of its four co-founders was to make Micron into a successful semiconductor chip design business, and in a testament to the needs of the time, its first contract was to design a memory chip that would have a capacity of 64 kilobits. Micron proved successful with that task, and by 1981, it had built an entirely new semiconductor chip fabrication plant in Boise. Its 64K dynamic random access memory (DRAM) made it into some of the most popular computing equipment of the early PC era, including the Commodore 64 home computer.

Like many chipmakers, Micron spent the following years looking to make its chips smaller and more powerful. The company cracked the 1-megabit threshold in 1987, and its products quickly made their way into PCs and graphics cards. Micron also ventured into other types of memory, including video random access memory (RAM) and fast static RAM in 1988. Subsequent increases in capacity paved the way for more complex operating systems like Microsoft (MSFT +1.90%) Windows to take their place as staples in the PC industry.

Paving the way for AI Many of the advances that have directly helped Micron become an industry leader in AI have been decades in the making. Double-data-rate and quad-data-rate architectures in 1999 and 2000 increased memory bandwidth. Pseudo-static RAM had lower power needs that helped make smartphones possible, while high-density server memory modules addressed the needs of data-intensive operations. NAND flash memory enabled chips to retain data even without constant power, and the evolution of solid-state drives helped to give users more choices in balancing the need for high-capacity data storage solutions against the ability to gain access to that data as quickly as possible.

Today's Change

(

3.17

%) $

12.13

Current Price

$

395.02

At this point, Micron has 60,000 patents to its name. That intellectual property is proving to be a valuable asset as the company moves forward in supplying the needs of AI hyperscalers and other customers. Moreover, Micron has expanded far beyond its Boise roots, with global manufacturing facilities that give the business worldwide scope.

Riding the waves of the memory-chip cycle From its story of success, it might seem as though Micron's journey from humble start-up to global behemoth went quite smoothly. However, the path that Micron took was a lot choppier than its timeline might suggest. Navigating the inevitable ups and downs in demand for its memory chips was a necessary skill in finding long-term success. As you'll read in the next article in this three-part series on Micron, it took considerable tenacity to make the company into the budding AI leader it is today.

Plenty of high-yield pipeline stocks grab more attention than Kinetik Holdings, but investors may want to examine this mid-cap name.

Within the energy patch, the midstream space, including pipeline operators, is hallowed ground for investors seeking above-average dividend yields. Those outsize payouts are rewards for investing in a slow-growth, toll-road-like industry with steady cash flows.

Dividends and predictability are attractive features, but they don't provide complete protection against downside. Take the case of Kinetik Holdings (KNTK +3.72%). This mid-cap pipeline company, which focuses on the energy commodities-rich Permian Basin, shed about 36% of its value over the 12 months ended Thursday, Feb. 5.

This pipeline stock tumbled last year, but it could be a buy for long-term investors. Image source: Getty Images.

Look now because the stock is on the mend, surging 14% over the past month. Time will tell just how sustainable that rally is, but some signs point to Kinetik as a credible consideration for buy-and-hold strategies for risk-tolerant investors.

Kinetik is delivering the dividend goods As of Feb. 5, Kinetik sports a dividend yield of 7.85%. Obviously, that's eye-catching, but more important than yield is payout growth. This Texas-based midstream company delivered on that front a couple of weeks ago, announcing a 4% increase in its quarterly payout to $0.81 a share.

The company has been paying dividends since 2021, and there have been some increases along the way, indicating that management prioritizes shareholder rewards. Undoubtedly, there are long payout-increase streaks across the commodities complex, but Kinetik is trending in the right direction regarding dividend consistency.

This pipeline operator may be positioned for durable, long-term increases in its dividend payment, particularly if it meets or beats expectations for improved earnings this year and in 2027, and as new projects come online.

Today's Change

(

3.72

%) $

1.49

Current Price

$

41.50

One of those projects is the ECCC pipeline, which could yield results as early as the second quarter. If Kinetik executes there and if natural gas liquids (NGL) volumes prove sturdy, those could be catalysts for dividend growth and accretive to the long-term thesis.

Kinetik offers value and other benefits Given Kinetik's weakness over the past year, investors are right to ponder if this is a value trap. Thirty-six percent declines have a way of giving off value trap vibes, but this energy stock doesn't appear to be a dubious value name. Instead, it has the makings of a legitimate value play, as it trades at a discount to peers.

The dividend and value may be among the reasons why some professional market participants are nibbling at this stock. Another one might be chatter on Wall Street that Kinetik is a viable takeover target for larger pipeline entities looking to increase their NGL and Permian Basin footprints.

On its own, takeover speculation isn't a reason to buy a stock, because the rumors may prove unfounded. Still, if a transaction materializes, it could be icing on the cake for Kinetik investors. In the meantime, they can enjoy the prospect of improved execution and, of course, the dividend.

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS +20.19%) wants to lead the development of quantum computing with a unique, dual-platform approach. The month of January included several steps to accomplish that goal.

Yet rather than sending shares higher, D-Wave stock lost 18.9% last month, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. That makes it a good time to take another look at the investing thesis.

Image source: Getty Images.

Game-changing potential Quantum computing could be a powerful game changer in many areas. It possesses enormous, transformative potential across industries such as pharmaceuticals, materials science, finance, and cybersecurity by tackling problems that classical computers cannot solve. 2025 was a somewhat breakthrough year as quantum sensing technology advanced beyond foundational research. The emphasis has shifted to production and deployment with quantum computing processing.

Companies are taking varied approaches, leaving investors to decide which, if any, quantum computing stocks to include in their portfolios. D-Wave was primarily known for its leading quantum annealing system, which is already commercially available. It's an energy-efficient system designed to help enterprises speed up decision-making, optimize operations, and respond to disruptions.

Last month, however, the company completed what could be a somewhat transformational acquisition. D-Wave brought Quantum Circuits Inc. (QCI) into its fold. That company creates full-stack superconducting gate-model quantum computing systems engineered for commercial scalability. The combination gives D-Wave a balance between its commercial annealing quantum systems and a path to develop gate-model quantum computers at scale for general-purpose, fault-tolerant computing.

Investors should keep eyes wide open D-Wave didn't break the bank with the acquisition. The price to acquire QCI was $550 million, consisting of a combination of $300 million in D-Wave stock and $250 million in cash. That may seem like a big purchase considering D-Wave only generated about $22 million in revenue over the first nine months of 2025. But that revenue more than tripled compared to the prior year period, and D-Wave held a cash balance of $836.2 million as of Sept. 30, 2025.

Today's Change

(

20.19

%) $

3.48

Current Price

$

20.68

Still, there's no guarantee the company will achieve enough success to justify its valuation of over $7 billion, let alone grow from there. Only highly risk-tolerant investors should own the stock at this early stage. Shares are going to be volatile, as evidenced by the 19% drop in January.

It's possible, if not likely, that investors will revalue the company if sales of D-Wave's quantum annealing system don't grow quickly enough, or if development of its gate-model system doesn't advance meaningfully this year. Investors should just be aware of those possibilities if wanting to speculate in the quantum annealing space.

The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:IVV) generates income the straightforward way: it holds the stocks of the 500 largest U.S.

Gold has been on a run over the last year, and these two ETFs have benefited substantially from it.

Both the Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM +5.73%) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU +2.99%) offer exposure to gold, but their strategies and risk profiles diverge sharply. This comparison unpacks their cost, performance, risk, portfolio makeup, and trading characteristics to help investors decide which may better fit their objectives.

Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSGDMIAUIssuerSprottISharesExpense ratio0.50%0.25%1-yr return (as of Feb. 7, 2026)137.07%72.60%Beta0.530.14AUM$718.12 million$78 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

IAU is more affordable with a 0.25% expense ratio compared to SGDM’s 0.50%, but its return over the last 12 months is substantially lower.

Performance & risk comparisonMetricSGDMIAUMax drawdown (5 y)-45.05%N/AGrowth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,735$2,690What's inside The iShares Gold Trust is designed to track the spot price of gold, offering direct exposure to physical bullion. With $78 billion in assets under management and a 21-year history, it serves as a highly liquid, low-cost vehicle for those seeking pure gold price exposure.

The Sprott Gold Miners ETF has a concentrated portfolio of 43 gold mining companies. Its top holdings include North American companies such as Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd. (TSX:AEM.TO), Newmont Corp. (NEM +6.26%), and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (TSX:WPM.TO). Companies with higher revenue growth and lower debt-to-equity (D/E) ratios are given more weight within the portfolio.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investorsWhen investing in ETFs tied to the performance of precious metals, be aware of the heightened volatility that can come with it compared to common stock-based ETFs. Precious metals can be very volatile, especially during times of economic and geopolitical turbulence.

Given that gold is one of the most traded precious metals in the world, its price can fluctuate sharply. As of now, that has benefited investors, as the metal is benefiting from international entities increasingly purchasing it for their reserves, while the U.S. dollar has also weakened. But investors should still be mindful that sudden drops can occur.

Choosing between these two ETFs yields similar results, as both are tied to the performance of gold. SGDM has had better one-year performance, but when looking at price returns over a five-year span, they’re nearly identical. However, if some investors don’t feel comfortable with an ETF that only holds gold, then SGDM may be more suitable.

, /PRNewswire/ --

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLP) resulting from allegations that Simulations Plus may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

So What: If you purchased Simulations Plus securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

What to do next: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=42476 https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=42439or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

What is this about: On July 15, 2025, during market hours, Benzinga published an article entitled "Simulations Plus Sees Weaker Demand Persist, Outlook Softens." The article stated that Simulations Plus shares had declined "following the release of [Simulations Plus'] third-quarter 2025 earnings report." The article stated that Simulations Plus had reported sales of $20.4 million, representing a 10% year-over-year increase, but this fell short of the consensus estimate of $20.9 million." Further, "[t]his miss followed preliminary third-quarter sales figures released in June, which were already lower than expectations at $19 million to $20 million, compared to a consensus of $22.78 million."

On this news, Simulations Plus' stock fell 25.75% on July 15, 2025.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions.  Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

      Laurence Rosen, Esq.
      Phillip Kim, Esq.
      The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
      275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
      New York, NY 10016
      Tel: (212) 686-1060
      Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
      Fax: (212) 202-3827
      [email protected]
      www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

The price of XRP has shown a sheer amount of resilience after a couple of red days for the general crypto market. The altcoin has managed to return to around $1.5 over the weekend, reflecting a nearly 25% jump since reaching its latest local low.

However, this fresh burst of momentum seems to be just that, a short-lived moment of positivity that might not translate to the long-term trajectory. According to the latest on-chain data, the XRP price might still be tilting more towards the bearish side of the market.

Low Funding Rate Signals Reduced Appetite In Derivatives Market In a recent Quicktake post on the CryptoQuant platform, Arab Chain revealed that belief might be increasingly exiting the XRP derivatives market. This on-chain observation is based on changes in the funding rates on Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization.

For context, the “funding rate” metric estimates the periodic fee exchanged between traders in the derivatives market of a particular cryptocurrency. A positive funding rate often signals that the long traders (investors with buy positions) are paying a fee to short traders (investors with sell positions) in the derivatives market, while a low funding rate metric implies that the payment is the other way round.

Source: CryptoQuant As shown in the chart above, the XRP funding rate on Binance has been in a notable decline over the past few days, recently dropping to around -0.028, reflecting its lowest level since April 2025. According to Arab Chain, this shift signals a clear move toward defensive positioning and hedging against further downside.

The on-chain analyst revealed that a deeply negative funding rate shows the level of pessimism in the market, as traders are more willing to pay a premium to hold short positions. This trend is even more damaging, considering the decline seen by the XRP price in the past few weeks.

Arab Chain wrote in the Quicktake post:

Historically, funding rates reaching extreme negative levels often coincide with advanced stages of downtrends, when a large portion of traders are already positioned short.

While low funding rates have sometimes set the stage for temporary rebounds triggered by a return of speculative demand, they often reflect heightened caution and reduced risk appetite in the market. Nevertheless, this funding rate level also suggests that any uptick in sentiment could catalyse “faster-than-expected” price moves.

XRP Price At A Glance As of this writing, the price of XRP stands at around $1.44, reflecting an over 1% decline in the past 24 hours.

The price of XRP on the daily timeframe | Source: XRPUSDT chart on TradingView Featured image from iStock, chart from TradingView