Market Signal Briefing

The request follows a separate House probe launched last week by Rep. Ro Khanna, widening the congressional scrutiny around the Trump-linked firm.

Journalist

Posted: February 15, 2026

Midnight [NIGHT] faced rejection at $0.56 a week ago, falling to a low of $0.47. However, as the broader crypto market rebounded, NIGHT’s downside spiral reversed. 

As a result, Midnight successfully held the $0.5 support level and climbed to a local high of $0.58. In fact, at press time,  NIGHT traded at $0.56, up 12.35% on the daily charts. 

Over the same period, its market capitalisation reached $1 billion before falling to $941 million, indicating strong bullish momentum.

Midnight defends key levels As the broader market signalled recovery, NIGHT buyers increased accumulation, which boosted the altcoin’s attempted rebound. 

Since then, Buy Volume to Price Pressure rose to 51 as of writing, while the sell pressure to the market dropped to 23. This implies that, although sellers were active, buyers outpaced them and drove prices higher in the short term. 

Source: TradingView

Additionally, Buyer Dominance increased to 93 million, while seller volume dominance declined to 36 million. This left the market with a positive Net pressure of 57 million, a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation. 

Higher demand in the spot market has often accelerated upside momentum, leading to higher prices.

Derivatives are even more optimistic Interestingly, as NIGHT began to recover from the recent slip, investors rushed into the futures market to secure strategic positions.

According to CoinGlass data, Open Interest (OI) rose 18.45% to $38.14 million while the Derivatives Volume climbed 45.9% to $66.05 million, at press time.

Source: CoinGlass

Usually, when OI and volume rise in tandem, it suggests increased participation and capital inflows into both short and long positions. Meanwhile, the altcoin’s Long Short Ratio rose to 1.11, with traders on Binance dominating the market with an average ratio of 1.

When the ratio exceeds 1, it suggests that most participants were bullish and positioned themselves to await further gains.

Can NIGHT’s momentum hold? Midnight rebounded as fresh demand returned across the market. Buyers entered the market, building on the momentum generated by the recent announcement of Google’s and Telegram’s partnership and mainnet launch by late March.

For that reason, the altcoin’s Stochastic RSI climbed to 88, at the time of writing, reaching overbought territory. Likewise, its Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) rose to 0.09, further supporting the trend’s strength.

Source: TradingView

When these momentum indicators reach elevated levels, they signal strong momentum, with buyers having the upper hand in the market.

Therefore, if demand for NIGHT holds, the uptrend will persist and target the $0.62 resistance level. On the other hand, since sellers remain active, if they flip the power dynamics, the altcoin will breach the $0.5 support again.

Final Summary Midnight successfully held the $0.5 support level, rising to a high of $0.58 before retracing to $0.56.  A flip in sentiment across the crypto market incentivized buyers to step in and accumulate NIGHT.

21h05 ▪ 4 min read ▪ by Evans S.

Summarize this article with:

For years, bitcoin has been sold as an escape route. A rare asset, outside central banks, supposed to shine when the rest trembles. Except that in 2026, the soundtrack changes: at the slightest twitch in tech, bitcoin coughs too. And that is more than a market detail. It is an open identity crisis.

In brief Bitcoin slips from the “digital gold” narrative towards a growth asset, increasingly following tech stocks. While ETH attracts aggressive treasury strategies, BlackRock pushes tokenization at the heart of DeFi via Uniswap. At the same time, Polymarket battles in court, indicating crypto is normalizing… while hitting the regulatory wall. When bitcoin sticks to stocks: the “digital gold” put to the test The most disturbing observation is not that BTC falls. It’s with whom it falls. Short-term behavior resembles more that of a growth stock than a safe haven like gold.

Why now? Because institutionalization has changed the mechanics. ETFs, desks, “risk-on/risk-off” strategies have placed bitcoin in the same baskets as the rest. When managers reduce exposure to risky assets, bitcoin often ends up in the same bag as tech stocks, even if its narrative says otherwise.

And the current trigger is almost ironic: uncertainties about AI’s impact on software. Software stocks are shaken, bitcoin follows the movement, as if it also wore a “growth” badge. In this setting, gold and silver can go their own way… while bitcoin remains stuck to investors’ mental Nasdaq.

Ether in treasury mode: a bet that doesn’t blink This shift in narrative is not limited to bitcoin. On Ethereum, another phenomenon is emerging: companies treat ETH as a strategic reserve, with a treasury logic… and a tolerance for chaos.

BitMine Immersion Technologies is a brutal illustration. In the middle of a correction, the company added 40,613 ETH, bringing its holdings to about 4.326 million ETH. We’re talking about a gigantic stock, showing massive latent losses at current prices. And despite that, they double down.

The implicit message is simple: “we don’t trade, we accumulate.” Tom Lee defends a strategy focused on the long term, even if it means enduring drawdowns that hurt the books on paper. It’s not romantic, it’s accounting. And that is precisely what makes the movement credible in the eyes of some investors.

But it also sends a signal to the market: if players accept latent losses of this magnitude to “hold,” then the debate is no longer just technological. It becomes financial, almost sociological: who has the stomach to survive volatility, and who has only a narrative without endurance?

BlackRock on Uniswap, Polymarket in court: crypto normalizes… while fighting This is where the story gets interesting: while bitcoin behaves like a stock, Wall Street begins to play directly on the DeFi stage. BlackRock has made its tokenized Treasury bond fund, BUIDL, tradable via UniswapX, with access reserved for “whitelisted” actors via Securitize, in a very institutional framework.

The symbol matters as much as the plumbing: a giant of traditional markets pushes an on-chain Treasury product, and in the same move, also buys UNI (amount undisclosed). This is not just tokenization. It is an attempt to install institutional rails at the heart of a protocol born to bypass rails.

And while some build bridges, others prepare for the regulatory shock. Polymarket has taken federal court action against the state of Massachusetts, challenging the idea that a state can restrict its event contracts, arguing that jurisdiction lies with the federal framework (CFTC) rather than a local mosaic. 

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Evans S.

Fascinated by Bitcoin since 2017, Evariste has continuously researched the subject. While his initial interest was in trading, he now actively seeks to understand all advances centered on cryptocurrencies. As an editor, he strives to consistently deliver high-quality work that reflects the state of the sector as a whole.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Online chatter is intensifying around a striking idea: autonomous AI agents may be gravitating toward bitcoin as their preferred rail for cyber sovereignty and permissionless finance, potentially reshaping market dynamics between humans and machines.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Senators Warren and Kim want answers. The two lawmakers fired off a letter demanding the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States review a reported $500 million UAE stake in World Liberty Financial, the crypto firm tied to Donald Trump.

The request piles onto growing congressional heat around the financial company. Representative Ro Khanna launched his own probe last week, and now more lawmakers are jumping in. Warren’s office didn’t mince words about the potential risks, calling the UAE investment a possible threat to national security. Kim’s team echoed those concerns, saying foreign money in politically connected American firms deserves serious scrutiny. The senators argue that critical financial institutions can’t be influenced by foreign entities without proper oversight.

World Liberty Financial stayed quiet. No comment yet.

CFIUS hasn’t said if it’ll launch a formal review either. The committee typically keeps its cards close to the chest during initial assessments, but this case is getting too much attention to ignore. Sources familiar with the process say CFIUS reviews can take months and often result in major changes to deals or outright blocks. The committee blocked Chinese acquisitions worth billions in recent years, and UAE investments aren’t immune from similar treatment.

The UAE’s financial ties with World Liberty Financial are part of bigger economic relationships between the countries. But Trump’s connection makes everything more complicated. Lawmakers are already nervous about foreign influence over political figures, and this $500 million investment hits that nerve directly. Warren has spent years going after foreign acquisitions in sensitive sectors, and she’s not backing down now.

“We need stringent review mechanisms,” Warren said in a statement. Her office pointed to critical infrastructure protection as a key concern.

Kim’s pushing the same message. He thinks even potential risks need thorough investigation to protect U.S. sovereignty. The New Jersey senator has been vocal about accountability in foreign investment deals since joining the Banking Committee last year.

Nobody knows what happens next. CFIUS must decide if it wants to dig deeper into the UAE investment and how far that review might go. The decision will shape World Liberty Financial’s future and set the tone for similar deals down the road. See also: Lise goes public and shakes up.

World Liberty Financial’s stakeholders are watching closely. The firm’s potential foreign ties are under intense scrutiny, but company officials aren’t talking. That silence leaves investors and lawmakers with more questions than answers about the firm’s strategic direction and foreign partnerships.

Market watchers want clarity fast. World Liberty Financial’s stock dropped 3.5% on February 13 when news of the congressional pressure broke. Investors are clearly spooked by the uncertainty around a potential CFIUS review. The company’s stock has been volatile since the UAE investment news first surfaced, with trading volumes spiking as institutional investors reassess their positions.

And this isn’t happening in a vacuum. The House Financial Services Committee held hearings on February 10 about national security risks from foreign investments. Senator Marco Rubio jumped into the conversation February 12, warning about threats from foreign money in sensitive sectors. The timing isn’t coincidental – lawmakers are clearly coordinating their response to what they see as a growing problem.

The UAE’s investment strategy is getting fresh attention too. Financial analysts note the country’s expanding presence in U.S. markets, particularly in tech and finance. Some see it as smart diversification, others worry about strategic intentions. The $500 million stake in World Liberty Financial fits a pattern of UAE investments in American companies with high-profile connections.

CFIUS has blocked similar deals before. Chinese firms faced major obstacles trying to buy American companies during the Trump and Biden administrations. The committee forced modifications to countless other transactions, often requiring foreign investors to divest stakes or accept operational restrictions. World Liberty Financial could face the same treatment if CFIUS decides the UAE investment poses security risks. For more details, see Russia Eyes Stablecoin Creation as Western.

Financial markets are jittery about the whole situation. Crypto-related stocks have been particularly volatile as investors try to gauge regulatory appetite for foreign investment in the sector. World Liberty Financial’s situation could set precedents for how CFIUS handles crypto firms with foreign backing and political connections.

The company still hasn’t disclosed details about the UAE investment or its strategic plans. That lack of transparency frustrates lawmakers who want to understand the firm’s intentions and foreign relationships. Warren’s office specifically called out the need for more disclosure in their CFIUS request.

For now, everyone’s waiting. CFIUS hasn’t announced a timeline for its decision, leaving stakeholders in limbo. The committee’s choice will likely influence how foreign investors approach politically sensitive American companies going forward. Until then, World Liberty Financial’s future remains unclear, and the UAE’s $500 million investment hangs in the balance.

The UAE has dramatically increased its U.S. investment activity over the past five years, with sovereign wealth funds like Mubadala and ADIA deploying over $15 billion annually in American markets. Recent deals include major stakes in fintech startups and energy infrastructure projects, making the World Liberty Financial investment part of a broader strategic push into sensitive American sectors.

Congressional sources indicate Warren and Kim’s letter represents just the opening salvo in what could become a sustained campaign. House Speaker Mike Johnson’s office has reportedly been briefed on the situation, and multiple committee chairs are considering joint hearings on foreign crypto investments. The coordinated response suggests lawmakers view this as a test case for how aggressively they’ll police foreign money in politically connected American firms.

Post Views: 1

Litecoin has closed the daily session on a bullish note, signaling renewed short-term momentum as price presses against a key resistance level. With $57 now acting as the immediate barrier, a decisive breakout and sustained hold above this zone could open the door for the next leg higher, potentially accelerating upside toward the mid-$60s.

Bullish Daily Close Signals Early Strength Providing a daily technical outlook on Litecoin, crypto analyst CryptoWzrd noted that LTC closed the session with a bullish daily candle, largely mirroring Bitcoin’s upward movement. The positive close signals improving short-term momentum, but the expert cautioned that broader continuation will require confirmation from additional market factors, particularly the LTCBTC pair.

Related Reading: Litecoin Structure Intact, But $63 Remains The Line Bulls Must Defend

Although Litecoin printed a constructive candle, LTCBTC closed indecisively, reflecting hesitation in Litecoin’s relative strength against Bitcoin. Sustained upside for LTC will likely depend on a shift toward clear bullish sentiment in LTCBTC, as that would confirm capital rotation and stronger underlying demand.

Source: Chart from CryptoWzrd on X From a structural perspective, CrytoWzrd emphasized that one more strong bullish daily candle from the current level is needed to validate a breakout above the daily lower-high trendline. If such confirmation occurs, Litecoin could transition into a more established bullish phase, with the $68 resistance level emerging as the next key upside target above the $56 zone. A stable and sustained move beyond resistance would further strengthen the case for trend continuation.

Until that higher-timeframe breakout is confirmed, the analyst plans to focus on lower-timeframe setups, particularly over the weekend. His approach remains tactical, looking for quick scalp opportunities while waiting for a more mature chart structure before engaging in larger directional trades.

$57: Litecoin Intraday Decision Zone The analyst went on to explain that Litecoin’s intraday structure is currently pressing against the key $57 resistance zone, a level that now acts as a short-term decision point for price. A clean and sustained hold above this area would signal strength and open the path toward $64, with the potential for further extension if momentum accelerates.

Related Reading: Litecoin 2M Bollinger Band Width Hits New Lows, CMT-Certified Analyst Reveals What It Means

He emphasized that simply wicking above resistance will not be enough. What’s needed is a stable bullish structure, ideally supported by rising volume and constructive follow-through, before considering a long position. Such confirmation would indicate that buyers are in control rather than the move being a temporary liquidity sweep.

At the same time, he noted that Bitcoin’s direction will likely dictate whether this breakout gains traction. Litecoin continues to follow broader market sentiment, meaning BTC’s strength could act as a catalyst for further gains. Until a mature and well-defined intraday structure forms, patience remains essential before engaging the next trade.

LTC trading at $55 on the 1D chart | Source: LTCUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com

TLDR: Three major exchanges show unswept XRP lows: KuCoin at $1.08, Bitfinex at $1.00, and Binance perp at $0.77.  Historical mean-reversion data suggests 45% average pullback could target the $0.75 to $0.65 support zone.  Seven exchange lows already swept including Poloniex, Gemini, Coinbase, Bitstamp, and Binance spot pairs.  Two scenario paths emerge: rapid liquidity sweep with violent reversal or slow bleed to targets before bounce. XRP price action has captured attention from technical analysts who point to specific exchange liquidity levels yet to be tested.

Crypto analyst EGRAG CRYPTO highlighted several key price points across major trading platforms that could serve as downside targets.

The analysis combines historical mean-reversion patterns with unfilled liquidity zones on exchange charts. Market participants now watch whether these levels will be reached before any reversal occurs.

Untapped Exchange Lows and Mean-Reversion Data

Three major exchange price levels remain unswept according to EGRAG CRYPTO’s recent analysis. KuCoin’s XRP/USDT pair shows a low of $1.08 that has not been taken yet.

Bitfinex recorded an XRP/USD low at $1.00 that also remains untouched. Binance perpetual futures for XRP/USD marked a wick down to $0.77 without a subsequent test.

The analyst contrasted these with already-swept levels across multiple platforms. Poloniex, Gemini, Coinbase, Bitstamp, TradingView, and Binance spot all saw their respective lows tested in recent price action.

#XRP – The Wick Map + Max Pain Setup (Read This Twice):

💡Market makers don’t “predict” , they engineer pain.

✅#XRP already swept most exchange lows Except: ▫️#KuCoin (XRP/USDT): $1.08 🔻Not Taken Yet ▫️Bitfinex (XRP/USD): $1.00🔻Not Taken Yet ▫️Binance Perp (XRP/USD):… pic.twitter.com/MjguiUlCAp

— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) February 14, 2026

Poloniex XRP/USDT touched $2.26 while the USD pair hit $2.17 during previous drawdowns. Gemini reached $2.10, Coinbase dropped to $1.77, and Bitstamp found support at $1.58 before bouncing.

Historical mean-reversion patterns from the Super Guppy indicator add context to potential downside projections. Cycle 1 showed approximately 50% retracement from local highs during previous corrections.

Cycle 2 demonstrated around 40% pullback before finding support and reversing. The average of these two cycles suggests roughly 45% mean reversion could occur.

Based on this historical data, the analyst projects a potential final sweep into the $0.75 to $0.65 range. This zone aligns with macro green uptrend support visible on longer-term charts.

The level also represents where remaining liquidity completion would occur across exchanges. An ascending triangle pattern on higher timeframes would remain structurally valid even with a move to this area.

Two Scenario Paths and Technical Structure The analysis presents two distinct paths forward for XRP price development. The first scenario involves a rapid liquidity sweep followed by an immediate violent reclaim of higher levels.

This pattern typically generates the fastest reversals when market sentiment reaches maximum pain. Such moves often catch traders off guard after capitulation moments.

The alternative path involves a slower price bleed toward the $0.75 to $0.65 zone over an extended period. After tagging these levels and completing the liquidity sweep, a reversal would then commence.

Both scenarios ultimately lead to the same technical outcome despite different timeframes and volatility profiles.

EGRAG CRYPTO emphasized viewing this as structural price action rather than emotional market behavior. The analyst noted that Binance printed the most aggressive downward wick visible on current charts.

The commentary stressed that tolerance for potential moves to $0.75 to $0.65 separates long-term holders from short-term participants.

The analyst disclosed maintaining a long-term position untouched while actively trading the macro range. Dollar-cost averaging continues for core holdings alongside cash reserves held for optimal entry timing.

This approach separates strategic accumulation from tactical trading within the broader price structure.

Turning around its business in Europe will be a big win, but what it could learn from a Chinese rival might be even more valuable.

For investors, the automotive industry probably seems like a game of whack-a-mole with icons such as Ford Motor Company (F +1.95%) and General Motors (GM +1.28%) constantly reacting to the new issue to pop up. One of the more challenging problems to pop up at Ford was its operations and business in Europe. Europe, an important global automotive market, has an obstacle course of challenges laid out for Ford, but the latter may have a trick up its sleeve to help turn business around – and investors are missing the best part.

How did this happen? It's been nearly a perfect storm of negative developments for Ford in Europe. The company's business had been under pressure for years, passenger vehicle demand has been weak, electric vehicle (EV) adoption has accelerated more slowly than anticipated, and new competition from highly affordable and advanced Chinese EV makers threatens market share and profitability.

Ford's profitability in Europe has been an up-and-down roller coaster, with previous significant restructuring returning its operations to profitability in late 2020, only to be followed by more bumpy quarters. To make matters worse, Ford canceled popular models such as the Fiesta, Focus, and Mondeo, all while battling high labor, energy, and warranty costs. Thankfully for investors, Ford has a plan to rebuild its business in Europe, and there's also another reason for optimism.

Today's Change

(

1.95

%) $

0.27

Current Price

$

14.12

The turnaround plan Ford essentially has a three-prong strategy to tackle its challenges in Europe. First, the company will focus on the gem of its European business, its Ford Pro commercial vehicle division, which is a higher-margin business than Ford's traditional business division, Ford Blue. The second part of the plan involves Ford significantly refreshing its passenger vehicle lineup with distinct designs and multiple options between hybrids, full-electric vehicles, and gasoline counterparts. Lastly, as always, Ford is aiming to improve scale and cost efficiencies through its operational footprint.

Those strategies will be key to turning around Ford's European business, but there's a big potential development that many investors have overlooked. While some may be quick to joke that Ford's key to beating Chinese competition won't be to produce vehicles for them in Europe, it actually might be.

Take it from Steve Greenfield, Automotive Ventures general partner: "The most important thing is sharing intellectual property," said Greenfield, according to Automotive News. "As the Chinese did to us 20 years ago over in China, we need to figure out how they're building cars faster and cheaper. And if we can make sure that intellectual property gets shared back to our legacy automakers, they're actually going to be more healthy as a result."

Image source: Ford Motor Company.

That's what makes Ford's recent discussions with China's Geely about a partnership in Europe so interesting. Essentially, Ford could produce vehicles for Geely using its excess production capacity in the country, which enables Geely to avoid importing vehicles with expensive tariffs, and in return, discussions are focused on shared vehicle technology, including autonomous driving.

Investors can look at Volkswagen Group's tie-up with Chinese EV maker Xpeng, which is enabling VW to develop vehicles up to 30% faster and 40% cheaper than the German automaker's MEB platform, thanks to the established competitive advantages from Xpeng.

What it all means Chinese automakers are expanding rapidly around the globe, and currently offer some of the most advanced and most affordable EVs on the market. Detroit autos, such as Ford, need to catch up, and they may need to learn some new tricks of the trade from their competitors. While Ford's turnaround in Europe won't be driven by its potential partnership with Geely, its long-term business is at stake. For savvy investors, these potential partnerships with Chinese EV makers are must-follow developments.

Centuri Holdings delivers utility infrastructure services across North America, supporting modernization for electric and gas providers.

On February 13, 2026, ACK Asset Management LLC disclosed it fully exited its position in Centuri Holdings (CTRI 0.51%), selling 1,375,000 shares in a transaction estimated at $29.11 million.

What happenedAccording to an SEC filing dated February 13, 2026, ACK Asset Management LLC sold its entire stake of 1,375,000 Centuri Holdings shares during the fourth quarter. As a result, the quarter-end value for the position declined by $29.11 million, and the fund now reports no Centuri shares among its holdings.

What else to knowTop holdings after the filing:NYSE:MTRN: $59.03 million (7.5% of AUM)NYSE:GVA: $57.67 million (7.3% of AUM)NYSE:WMS: $56.48 million (7.1% of AUM)NYSE:ATS: $50.84 million (6.4% of AUM)NYSE:CNM: $46.77 million (5.9% of AUM)As of February 12, 2026, Centuri shares were priced at $31.11, up 45.9% over one year and well outperforming the S&P 500 by 33.0 percentage points.Company overview

MetricValuePrice (as of market close 2026-02-12)$31.11Market Capitalization$3.14 billionRevenue (TTM)$2.84 billionNet Income (TTM)$2.51 millionCompany snapshotCenturi Holdings offers utility infrastructure services, including gas and electric utility maintenance, replacement, repair, and installation across North America.The company focuses on modernization and expansion of energy infrastructure for utility providers.It serves electric, gas, and combination utility companies, with additional exposure to end markets such as renewable energy, data centers, and telecommunications.Centuri Holdings, Inc. is a leading utility infrastructure services provider with a diversified portfolio across gas and electric segments in the U.S. and Canada. The company leverages its scale and longstanding industry relationships to secure recurring service contracts from major utility operators. Its strategic focus on infrastructure modernization and critical utility support positions it as a key partner in the evolving North American energy landscape.

What this transaction means for investorsIn November, Centuri posted record quarterly revenue of $850 million, up 18.1% year over year, and shares have been doing well, making this move all the more interesting. Under the hood, base revenue, which strips out storm work, climbed 25%, and base gross profit increased 28%. Adjusted EBITDA came in at $75.2 million, while adjusted diluted EPS improved to $0.19 from $0.06 a year ago. More importantly, the company secured $815 million in quarterly bookings, driving a 1.8x book-to-bill through the first three quarters and lifting backlog to a record $5.9 billion.

Shares are up 45.9% over the past year, and within a portfolio concentrated in industrial and materials names like Materion, Granite Construction, and Advanced Drainage Systems, this was a clear infrastructure bet.

For long-term investors, the tension is valuation versus visibility. Backlog growth suggests durable demand tied to utility modernization, but leverage and margin discipline might determine whether that demand translates into sustained shareholder returns.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Drainage Systems and Materion. The Motley Fool recommends ATS Corp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 14, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Ramaco Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: METC) between July 31, 2025 and October 23, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important March 31, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Ramaco securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Ramaco class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52081 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 31, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had not commenced any significant mining activity at the Brook Mine after groundbreaking; (2) no active work was taking place at the Brook Mine; (3) as a result, Ramaco overstated development progress at the Brook Mine; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Ramaco's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Ramaco class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52081 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/283873

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

NEW YORK, Feb. 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE: PFSI) resulting from allegations that PennyMac may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased PennyMac securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51887 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On January 29, 2026, PennyMac filed a Current Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K announcing PennyMac’s fourth quarter and full-year 2025 financial results. The report stated that PennyMac’s “servicing segment pretax income was $37.3 million, down from $157.4 million in the prior quarter and $87.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024,” as well as “[retax income excluding valuation-related items was $47.8 million, down 70 percent from the prior quarter driven primarily by increased realization of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) cash flows as lower mortgage rates drove higher prepayment activity.”

On this news, PennyMac’s stock price fell $49.78 per share, or 33.3%, to close at $99.92 per share on January 30, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com

Making AI data centers perform better is more difficult. The new frontier is the tech that interconnects thousands of processor chips.

Most investors would probably agree that artificial intelligence (AI) stocks remain the market's best bet for growth. But there's also no denying that leading AI stock Nvidia (NVDA 2.21%) has lost a bit of its shine, while the AI infrastructure arena's getting a bit crowded.

What's the next big thing in AI? It's arguably the improvement of data center interconnectivity equipment. See, one of the industry's biggest bottlenecks right now is connecting all the racks and racks of processors within an AI data center into a single neural network. It requires ultra-fast technology.

A company called Astera Labs (ALAB +2.01%) quietly supplies it.

Image source: Getty Images.

Next-generation AI data center technology It's not the only name in the business, to be clear. For instance, Astera competes with much bigger Broadcom (AVGO 1.81%). What this $30 billion company lacks in size, however, it more than makes up for in agility, creativity, and ingenuity.

Case in point: Astera's Scorpio smart "fabric" switches. These are the market's first PCIe 6 fabric switch, purpose-built for scaling up existing artificial intelligence data centers. They're unique in that they're software-defined, making them flexible enough to interconnect a wide range of GPUs to other GPUs, but also accelerating their connections to SSDs, network interface cards, and other components found within a data center rack. It can also connect older and newer components.

It's not just hardware, though. Astera provides complete data center management systems, by also offering the software that makes the most of a data center's physical tech. Its COnnectivity System Management and Optimization Software -- or COSMOS, for short -- allows operators to monitor the performance of every link between two pieces of hardware. It can even predict when a physical component's failure is likely, and reroute data flow around this hardware as needed.

The real proof of Astera Labs' potential, however, is in its past, present, and future results. The company reported full-year revenue growth of $852.5 million for 2025, up 115% year over year. That's a tough act to follow, but the company's still doing pretty well. It's calling for top-line growth in the ballpark of $290 million, up 83% from a year earlier. Analysts, meanwhile, expect revenue growth of nearly 29% for the entirety of 2026.

Today's Change

(

2.01

%) $

2.54

Current Price

$

129.12

It's all, of course, a testament to the ever-growing demand for artificial intelligence data center interconnectivity solutions ... a business Mordor Intelligence expects to grow by nearly 15% per year through 2032, when it will be worth more than $40 billion.

That figure may understate the true potential of high-performance switching solutions like Astera's, though. Dell'Oro Group says the number could be closer to $100 billion. As Dell'Oro Group VP Sameh Boujelbene explained in a statement: "To meet this explosive demand for compute, we can no longer rely solely on scale-out networks to provide GPU-to-GPU connectivity across racks. This shift is driving the rise of scale-up fabrics that tightly couple GPUs and memory within a shared high-bandwidth environment, enabling the distributed reasoning."

If that sounds a lot like the scale-up solutions Astera Labs offers, that's because it is.

Opportunity knocks Do know that this stock ebbs and flows rather wildly; that's just the nature of the beast for any outfit this closely tethered to the AI revolution. In fact, it stumbled following the recent release of its fourth-quarter earnings, even though earnings topped analysts' estimates. Guidance wasn't exactly shabby either.

For investors who can keep the bigger picture in mind, however, these setbacks are great long-term buying opportunities.

The insurance technology company has been impressing the market.

Lemonade (LMND +2.60%) is finally getting some market love, and its stock has doubled over the past year. The artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning-driven insurance platform is gaining new customers and demonstrating accelerating growth, and it's getting closer to net profitability.

It's scheduled to provide its fourth-quarter earnings update on Feb. 19. Is now the time to buy?

Image source: Getty Images.

High expectations Lemonade is just over a decade old, and it's already becoming a major player in insurance, facing off against centuries-old competition. It has an edge in its digital platform with interconnected parts, and the large legacy insurance giants are trying to keep up.

It's attracting customers at a rapid pace, hooking them into lower-priced products as they start out with rentals and home ownership, with the strategy to cross-sell products as this clientele ages. That puts it at a disadvantage in the short term, but sets it up for long-term success, and the strategy is already working.

Another element of that model that has been a sore point is that as a young company with less data, the company's algorithms have been in a training stage. The company's loss ratio, which measures how much it pays out as claims, has been high for an insurance company. However, the machine learning edge is kicking in as Lemonade adds more data to the system, and the loss ratio has started a serious decline. It was 67% in the 2025 third quarter for the trailing 12 months, a full 10 percentage points lower than the previous year.

Management is guiding for in-force premium, its favored top-line metric, to increase 29% year over year in the fourth quarter, with a 48% increase in revenue. It's also expecting adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to be a $14.5 million loss, an improvement from a $24 million loss the previous year, and it's expecting to become profitable on an adjusted EBITDA basis by the end of this year.

Today's Change

(

2.60

%) $

1.61

Current Price

$

63.57

A premium stock price At the current price, Lemonade stock has started to become expensive again. It trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 9. That premium could be justified considering Lemonade's high growth and long-term opportunity, but it doesn't give the company a lot of room for error.

Lemonade stock has started to slide over the past few weeks as insiders have been selling and the market is recognizing the hefty price tag heading closer to earnings. That gives it some room to bounce back if all goes right in the report. However, it could slide a lot more if the company misses on analyst expectations, guidance for 2026, or anything else the market doesn't like.

If you have a long time horizon and some risk tolerance, the best time to buy is now, earnings report or not. Don't buy it expecting the growth stock to jump after earnings, although if it does, you'll already be in a great position.

NEW YORK, Feb. 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Klarna Group plc (NYSE: KLAR) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and related prospectus (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with Klarna’s September 2025 initial public offering (the “IPO”), of the important February 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action first filed by the Firm.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Klarna securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Klarna class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=48971 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 20, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, the Registration Statement contained false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Defendants materially understated the risk that Klarna’s loss reserves would materially go up within a few months of the IPO, which they either knew of or should have known of given the risk profile of many individuals agreeing to Klarna’s buy now, pay later (“BNPL”) loans; and (2); as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Klarna class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=48971 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This digital banking platform targets U.S. mass market consumers with mobile-first, fee-free services and strategic bank partnerships.

On February 13, 2026, Ranger Investment Management disclosed a new position in Chime Financial (CHYM +1.81%), acquiring 591,255 shares in a trade estimated at $14.88 million.

What happenedAccording to the SEC filing dated February 13, 2026, Ranger Investment Management, L.P. initiated a new position in Chime Financial by acquiring 591,255 shares. The quarter-end value of this position stood at $14.88 million.

What else to knowThis was a new position for the fund, with the stake accounting for 1.02% of 13F reportable assets under management as of December 31, 2025.Top holdings after the filing:NASDAQ:PEGA: $54.40 million (3.7% of AUM)NASDAQ:LGND: $51.05 million (3.5% of AUM)NASDAQ:ADMA: $41.97 million (2.9% of AUM)NYSE:AGX: $36.62 million (2.5% of AUM)NYSE:EE: $34.24 million (2.3% of AUM)As of February 13, 2026, shares of Chime Financial were priced at $19.69, down about 27% from their $27 offering price in June.

Company OverviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close 2026-02-13)$19.69Market Capitalization$7.4 billionRevenue (TTM)$2.1 billionNet Income (TTM)($984.8 million)Company SnapshotChime offers mobile-first, fee-free banking services including checking, savings, early paycheck access, and overdraft protection.The company generates revenue primarily through interchange fees collected via partnerships with FDIC-insured banks.It targets U.S. consumers earning under $100,000 per year, focusing on the mass market segment.Chime Financial, Inc. operates a digital banking platform focused on accessible, low-cost financial services. The company leverages a technology-driven approach and strategic bank partnerships to streamline operations and reduce costs. Its competitive edge lies in its mobile-first strategy and commitment to eliminating traditional banking fees for its core customer base.

What this transaction means for investorsDigital banking scale rarely comes cheaply, and with Chime shares trading 27% below their $27 IPO price, the question has shifted from hype to durability.

The fintech generated $544 million in third-quarter revenue, up 29% year over year, with gross profit of $474 million and an 87% gross margin. Active members climbed 21% to 9.1 million, while adjusted EBITDA turned positive at $29 million, a 5% margin and a 9-point year over year improvement. Management now expects full-year revenue of up to $2.173 billion and adjusted EBITDA of as much as $118 million. Meanwhile, net losses persist under GAAP, but operating leverage is emerging.

At 1% of assets, this position is modest relative to larger bets in software and biotech such as Pegasystems and Ligand, but it’s still notable. Ultimately, long-term investors should focus on interchange resilience, member monetization through products like MyPay and OIT, and whether margin expansion keeps pace with scale. If execution continues, today’s discount could look less like a warning and more like an entry point.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Adma Biologics. The Motley Fool recommends Excelerate Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Expense ratios, diversification, and risk profiles set these mining ETFs apart—see how these factors shape their roles in a portfolio.

The Global X - Silver Miners ETF (SIL +5.15%) and the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX +5.76%) both offer concentrated mining exposure, but SIL is silver-centric with a higher recent return and drawdown, while GDX is gold-focused, lower cost, and more diversified.

Both SIL and GDX give investors targeted access to mining companies, but their approaches diverge by metal and portfolio construction. This comparison unpacks how their cost, performance, risk, and underlying holdings shape their appeal for those considering a precious metals allocation.

Snapshot (Cost & Size)MetricSILGDXIssuerGlobal XVanEckExpense ratio0.65%0.51%1-yr return (as of 2026-02-06)167.2%136.8%Dividend yield1.0%0.6%Beta0.710.55AUM$6.2 billion$30.5 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The one-year return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

GDX is more affordable with a 0.51% expense ratio compared to SIL’s 0.65%, and while SIL offers a slightly higher dividend yield, the difference is modest at 1.0% versus 0.6%.

Performance & Risk ComparisonMetricSILGDXMax drawdown (5 y)(55.63%)(46.52%)Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,169$2,765What's InsideGDX exclusively tracks companies in the global gold mining industry, spreading its assets across 55 holdings. Its largest positions include Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM +5.64%) at 9.25%, Newmont Corp (NEM +6.50%) at 8.88%, and Barrick Mining Corp (B +5.68%) at 6.79%. GDX’s 19.7-year track record and $30.5 billion in assets under management point to deep liquidity and an established presence in the gold mining space.

SIL, in contrast, limits its focus to the silver mining sector, with 39 holdings. Its top allocations are Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM +4.82%) at 21.80%, Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS +6.12%) at 11.67%, and Coeur Mining Inc (CDE +7.07%) at 7.88%. While both funds are 100% basic materials, SIL’s heavier weighting in its top names signals a more concentrated portfolio, potentially increasing volatility for investors seeking silver-specific exposure.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What This Means For InvestorsSmart investors know that portfolio diversification is a good idea. Precious metals provide an excellent way to achieve diversification. They have little to no correlation to equity markets. Moreover, they can serve as a hedge against inflation. While the Global X - Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) don’t provide direct exposure to gold and silver prices, they do tend to move in tandem. Here’s what investors need to know.

First off, it’s important to note that the price of gold or silver miners can — and does — deviate from the price of the underlying metal. For example, over the last ten years, GDX has delivered a total return of 435%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) — which tracks the spot price of gold — has advanced by 289%. Both returns are impressive, but GDX has delivered significant outperformance.

The same is not the case with silver. iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has increased by 375% over the last decade, but SIL has increased by 350%. In the case of silver, the fund which tracks the spot price of the metal (SIL) has outperformed the silver miners fund — albeit only slightly.

Investors may also want to consider the diversification of the funds themselves. GDX has 55 holdings, with no stock comprising more than 10% of overall holdings. SIL, on the other hand, has only 39 positions, with Wheaton Precious Metals making up more than 21% of its holdings.

In summary, both GDX and SIL provide diversification for investors. Even though both funds hold shares of mining companies rather than direct precious metals, they still offer a high correlation to the price of gold and silver, respectively. GDX has more holdings, a lower expense ratio, and has outperformed its underlying asset more than SIL. However, SIL offers a higher dividend yield, and silver has outperformed gold in recent years.

DXP Enterprises distributes industrial MRO products and services to a diverse North American client base across critical sectors.

On February 13, 2026, ACK Asset Management LLC disclosed a new position in DXP Enterprises (DXPE +4.31%), acquiring 240,000 shares worth $26.35 million.

What happenedAccording to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated February 13, 2026, ACK Asset Management LLC established a new stake in DXP Enterprises (DXPE +4.31%), acquiring 240,000 shares. The quarter-end value of the position stood at $26.35 million.

What else to knowThis was a new position, representing 3.31% of the fund’s 13F reportable assets under management as of December 31, 2025.Top five holdings after the filing:NYSE: MTRN: $59.03 million (7.5% of AUM)NYSE: GVA: $57.67 million (7.3% of AUM)NYSE: WMS: $56.48 million (7.1% of AUM)NYSE: ATS: $50.84 million (6.4% of AUM)NYSE: CNM: $46.77 million (5.9% of AUM)As of February 12, 2026, shares of DXP Enterprises were priced at $142.41, up 40% over the past year and outperforming the S&P 500 by 27 percentage points.Company overviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close 2026-02-12)$142.41Market Capitalization$2.28 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.96 billionNet Income (TTM)$87.19 millionCompany snapshotDXP Enterprises distributes maintenance, repair, and operating (MRO) products and equipment, with offerings spanning rotating equipment, bearings, power transmission, fluid power, safety products, and custom pump solutions.The company operates a multi-segment business model combining product distribution, integrated supply chain services, and fabrication of custom-engineered pump packages, generating revenue through both direct sales and value-added services.It serves a diversified customer base in the energy, oil and gas, food and beverage, petrochemical, transportation, mining, construction, chemical, municipal, agriculture, and pulp and paper industries across the United States and Canada.DXP Enterprises is a leading North American distributor of industrial MRO products and services, with a strong presence in critical end markets and a focus on technical expertise and integrated solutions. The company's diversified segment structure enables it to capture value through both product sales and a range of services, supporting customers in the industrial and energy sectors. DXP Enterprises' scale, broad product portfolio, and tailored supply chain offerings position it as a strategic partner for industrial and energy sector clients seeking operational efficiency and reliability.

What this transaction means for investorsDXP’s performance is noteworthy both in its stock chart and its earnings report. Shares are up 40% over the past year, and the firm posted $513.7 million in third-quarter sales, up 8.6% year over year, with diluted EPS of $1.31. Adjusted EBITDA reached $56.5 million, or an 11.0% margin, and free cash flow climbed 15.4% to $28.1 million in the quarter

Plus, cash stands at $123.8 million, with total debt of $644.0 million and a net leverage ratio of 2.31 to 1. That balance sheet is supporting ongoing acquisitions, including five completed last year.

At 3.3% of assets, this is a meaningful position compared with other top holdings in infrastructure and industrial names like Granite Construction and Advanced Drainage Systems. Ultimately, long-term investors should watch organic sales per business day and margin durability. If execution continues, scale and acquisition integration could compound earnings well beyond the current cycle.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Drainage Systems, DXP Enterprises, and Materion. The Motley Fool recommends ATS Corp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

MP Materials and USA Rare Earth are solving the same problem. Which one will make investors rich over the long term?

MP Materials (MP +1.29%) and USA Rare Earth (USAR +1.81%) are both after the same goal: to build a supply chain for rare-earth metals and magnets in the U.S. Both companies are still early in the buildout phase, yet which will make you richer will depend on how much risk you're ultimately willing to take.

Image source: Getty Images.

Of the two, MP looks like the less risky option. The company owns and operates the Mountain Pass mine in California, the only active rare-earth metals mine in the U.S. It also operates a magnet factory in Fort Worth, Texas, known as Independence, and it's building a second facility, the "10X Facility," that will lift its total domestic magnet output to an estimated 10,000 metric tons.

Today's Change

(

1.29

%) $

0.74

Current Price

$

58.04

USA Rare Earth is pre-revenue, and it controls the Round Top deposit, one of the largest deposits of heavy rare-earth elements in the U.S. While this site is not operational yet, the company is aiming for commercial production in 2028.

In early 2026, the Trump administration announced a $1.6 billion funding package for USA Rare Earth. Funding from this deal will help the company develop its mine and build its first magnet factory in Oklahoma.

Today's Change

(

1.81

%) $

0.34

Current Price

$

19.43

MP Materials has also been a beneficiary of the Trump administration. Indeed, in July 2025, it received a $400 million investment from the Department of Defense. The deal also included an agreement to buy 100% of the company's future production from its second magnet factory when it's finished.

MP carries a market value in the $11 to $12 billion range, while USA Rare Earth's is between $4 and $5 billion. Both companies are solving a critical problem -- the U.S. is too reliant on China for rare-earth metals and magnets -- but are in different stages of development. MP is actually generating revenue, but USA Rare Earth may offer investors more upside later if it can successfully open its first mine.

That said, both mining stocks are still speculative, and their success relies on continued demand for homegrown permanent magnets. Ultimately, execution will decide which one becomes America's go-to company for permanent magnets.

Hiroshi Mikitani
Founder, Chairman, President & CEO

Hello, everyone. Thank you very much for taking the time out of your busy schedules to join us today. I will be explaining the results of Rakuten Group for the fourth quarter and fiscal year of 2025.

Here is today's agenda. First, I will explain the business performance. Then our CFO, Hirose, will explain the financial results, followed by our Chief AI and Data Officer, Ting, who will provide an update regarding our AI initiatives.

First, I will provide a summary of the performance and KPIs of fiscal year 2025. First of all, as we announced at the end of last year, Rakuten Mobile's total number of subscribers surpassed our target of 10 million subscribers. I would like to once again express my gratitude to not only our users, but also our partner companies and everyone who has supported us. At the same time, Rakuten Mobile also achieved full year profitability at the EBITDA level of JPY 12.9 billion, a significant year-on-year improvement of JPY 66.7 billion.

Next, I would like to report on our consolidated financial results for fiscal year 2025. Consolidated revenue increased 9.5% year-on-year to JPY 2.5 trillion, marking the 29th consecutive year of revenue growth. In particular, the FinTech segment contributed significantly to this growth, which was up 19% year-on-year. Consolidated non-GAAP operating income increased significantly by JPY 99.2 billion year-on-year to JPY 106.3 billion, thanks to the significant contributions of the FinTech segment and improved losses in the Mobile segment.

February 14, 2026 14:00 ET  | Source: Belo Sun Mining Corp.

TORONTO, Feb. 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Belo Sun Mining Corp. (“Belo Sun” or the “Company”) (TSX: BSX, OTCQB: BSXGF) is pleased to announce that the Federal Regional Court has accepted our appeal to reinstate the Installation License, which was suspended in 2017 for the Company’s Volta Grande Gold Project (the “Project”) located in Pará State, Brazil.

Background

As previously disclosed, the Federal Court of Altamira had recently maintained the suspension of the Installation License, in force since 2017. The Company adopted appropriate legal measures to challenge that decision.

Court of Appeal Decision

On February 13, 2026, Desembargador Federal Flávio Jardim of TRF-1’s 6th Panel granted interim relief, suspending the lower court decision and fully restoring the effectiveness of the Installation License. The ruling authorizes Belo Sun to resume and continue regular installation activities for the Project.

In his ruling, the Court found that the Company had fully complied with the conditions previously imposed by TRF-1, including that: (i) the Indigenous Component Study (“ECI”) had been prepared based on primary data, as required; (ii) prior, free and informed consultation had been conducted in accordance with the Juruna Protocol, with adequate information, internal deliberation and culturally appropriate participation; and (iii) the Juruna (Yudjá) and Arara of the Volta Grande do Xingu communities had participated in all stages of the consultation process, with formal statements of support. The Court found the consultation had been carried out in good faith, in a participatory and transparent manner, consistent with International Labour Organization Convention No. 169.

The Court further held that FUNAI’s subsequent reversal of its earlier position, which had confirmed the sufficiency of the ECI and the regularity of the consultation process, was not supported by any formal administrative procedure as required under applicable regulations. The ruling determined that any new requirements by FUNAI, including any request to expand the scope of the consultation, must be preceded by a formal administrative process with proper technical justification.

Construction Activities

As a result of the ruling, the Installation License is now fully effective and the Company is authorized to proceed with construction and installation activities for the Project.

Next Steps

The respondents to the appeal have been given the opportunity to file a response, and the interlocutory appeal will proceed to review by the 6th Panel of TRF-1. The Company will provide further updates as appropriate.

Clovis Torres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Belo Sun commented: "We welcome this major milestone, which is all the more meaningful given that the project’s suspension in 2017 marked a challenging period for our team and shareholders. Today, we would like to congratulate everyone whose determination and professionalism have made this new phase possible.

We also wish to express our sincere gratitude for the steadfast support we have received over the years from the local communities and Federal, State and Municipal authorities. Their trust and engagement have been essential throughout this journey.

This project will be developed in accordance with best international mining practices to protect the environment, while also applying the highest social standards. Our ambition is clear: to contribute sustainably to the economic development of the region by creating tangible opportunities for local residents and generating long-term positive results.”

About the Company

Belo Sun Mining Corp. is a mineral exploration and development company with gold-focused properties in Brazil. Belo Sun’s primary focus is advancing and expanding its 100% owned Volta Grande Gold Project in Pará State, Brazil. Belo Sun trades on the TSX under the symbol “BSX” and on the OTCQB under the symbol “BSXGF.” For more information about Belo Sun, please visit www.belosun.com. 

For inquiries, please contact Belo Sun Mining Corp, +1 (416) 861-2262 or [email protected].

Caution regarding forward-looking information:

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, without limitation, statements regarding the reinstatement and continued effectiveness of the Installation License; the continuation of installation and construction activities for the Project; the outcome of the review by the 6th Panel of TRF-1; and the advancement of the Volta Grande Project. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information, including, without limitation, risks related to the outcome of the 6th Panel review and the possibility that the interim relief may be reversed; risks related to further legal challenges or regulatory proceedings; risks inherent in the mining industry and risks described in the public disclosure of the Company which is available under the profile of the Company on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the Company's website at www.belosun.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

© Zamrznuti tonovi / Shutterstock.com

Carvana’s wild ride hit a speed bump this week. The online used car retailer dropped 14.98% over the past five trading days, closing at $343.19 on Friday. That’s a steeper decline than the broader market’s 1.29% dip and the Consumer Discretionary sector’s 1.54% slide. Year to date, Carvana (NYSE:CVNA) is down 18.68%, though it’s still up 26% over the past year.

Three storylines explain what’s driving the selloff and what it means for the company’s trajectory.

Insider Selling Raises Eyebrows Carvana’s executive team has been systematically liquidating shares. On February 2, 2026, CFO Mark Jenkins sold 12,058 shares across 21 separate transactions at prices ranging from $393.05 to $418.87. COO Benjamin Huston unloaded 10,628 shares the same day. The day before, eight executives sold at the identical price of $401.11, suggesting coordinated Rule 10b5-1 plan execution.

The pattern extends back months. In December 2025, Chief Product Officer Daniel Gill sold 120,000+ shares at prices between $429 and $476. COO Huston dumped 100,000+ shares during the same period. What’s notable: executives are exercising stock options at $0.0 and immediately selling rather than holding newly vested equity.

There are no open-market purchases in the data, only liquidations of compensation. That’s not a confidence signal. If we zoom back an entire year, we find 55 open market buys, so it’s a little striking that there have been so few recently.

Retail Investors Sound the Alarm Reddit sentiment turned decidedly bearish this week, with activity spiking on February 13. The dominant narrative shifted from valuation concerns to something more serious. On February 11, a post titled “Carvana CVNA Should Delay Earnings Report and Come Clean on Accounting Discrepencies” gained traction with 38 upvotes and 29 comments. By February 13, the conversation escalated to fraud allegations, with a post titled “Carvana $CVNA Fraud Comes To Light” drawing 153 upvotes and 145 comments.

The retail crowd is also positioning for downside. Options traders in r/options were discussing puts on February 11, signaling hedging or outright bearish bets. Sentiment scores dropped from 18 on February 5 to 10-12 by February 13, with the category remaining “Very Bearish” throughout.

Competitive Landscape Deteriorates CarMax Inc (NYSE:KMX), Carvana’s primary competitor, dropped 12.19% this week, nearly matching Carvana’s decline. That’s significant because it suggests sector-wide pressure rather than company-specific issues. CarMax trades at 15x trailing earnings with a $6 billion market cap, while Carvana sits at 78x earnings with a $74.6 billion valuation. The valuation gap matters when both companies face the same headwinds.

If consumers are tightening spending on vehicles, both Carvana and CarMax feel it. The difference is Carvana’s valuation leaves no room for error, while CarMax trades like a mature retailer navigating a tough environment.

This enterprise software provider delivers cloud-based AI solutions for customer engagement, compliance, and financial crime prevention.

On February 13, 2026, Black Creek Investment Management Inc. disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold 271,072 shares of NICE (NICE 2.02%) in the fourth quarter, an estimated $32.75 million transaction based on quarterly average pricing.

What happenedAccording to a SEC filing dated February 13, 2026, Black Creek Investment Management Inc. reduced its stake in NICE (NICE 2.02%) by 271,072 shares in the final quarter of 2025. The estimated value of shares sold was $32.75 million, based on the quarter’s average unadjusted closing price. The fund’s position in NICE dropped to 584,209 shares, with the quarter-end valuation falling by $57.79 million due to both trading activity and market price movement.

What else to knowThis was a sale; NICE now represents 3.28% of Black Creek’s 13F AUM.Top five fund holdings after the filing:NYSE:ELAN: $250.32 million (12.4% of AUM)NYSE:BAH: $211.34 million (10.5% of AUM)NASDAQ:PSMT: $201.01 million (10.0% of AUM)NASDAQ:PYPL: $187.56 million (9.3% of AUM)NYSE:FCN: $183.17 million (9.1% of AUM)As of February 12, 2026, NICE shares were priced at $105.69, down 38.5% over the past year and underperforming the S&P 500 by 51.42 percentage points.Company overviewMetricValueRevenue (TTM)$2.88 billionNet Income (TTM)$561.06 millionPrice (as of market close February 12, 2026)$105.69One-Year Price Change(38.52%)Company snapshotNICE provides cloud-based AI-driven platforms for digital business solutions, including CXone for contact centers, Enlighten AI for customer experience automation, and financial crime compliance solutions.It offers cloud-based platforms, software licensing, and services to enterprise and public sector clients.The company serves global enterprises, government agencies, and financial institutions seeking advanced customer engagement, compliance, and analytics solutions.This enterprise software provider delivers cloud-native platforms and AI-powered solutions for customer experience, compliance, and financial crime prevention. With a global footprint and a diversified product suite, NICE leverages advanced analytics and automation to address complex enterprise needs. Its strategic focus on scalable cloud offerings and AI-driven innovation underpins its competitive position in the enterprise software market.

What this transaction means for investorsTrimming a cloud software name after a brutal 38.5% one-year drop might signal a shift in risk appetite more than a verdict on the business itself.

NICE recently delivered third-quarter revenue of $732 million, up 6% year over year, with cloud revenue climbing 13% to $562.9 million. GAAP operating income rose 14% to $160.8 million and diluted EPS jumped 23% to $2.29. Meanwhile, AI ARR accelerated 49% year over year. Management even raised full-year non-GAAP revenue guidance to a midpoint near $2.94 billion.

Yet the position now sits at just 3.28% of assets, far smaller than core holdings like Elanco, Booz Allen, and PriceSmart. This portfolio leans into steadier cash generators and value-tilted names. NICE, despite its improving margins and net cash position of $455.9 million, remains exposed to enterprise IT budgets and competitive AI spending cycles.

Long-term investors should separate price pain from operating progress. If cloud growth and AI monetization continue compounding, today’s multiple may look different in hindsight. But portfolio concentration tells you where true conviction lives.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Booz Allen Hamilton, FTI Consulting, Nice, and PayPal. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2027 $42.50 calls on PayPal and short March 2026 $65 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

FTI Consulting provides business advisory services worldwide, specializing in transformation, risk mitigation, and dispute resolution.

On February 13, 2026, Black Creek Investment Management Inc. disclosed it bought 402,008 shares of FTI Consulting (FCN +1.13%), an estimated $66.27 million trade based on quarterly average pricing.

What happenedAccording to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated February 13, 2026, Black Creek Investment Management Inc. increased its position in FTI Consulting by 402,008 shares during the fourth quarter. The estimated transaction value was $66.27 million, calculated using average unadjusted closing prices for the period. The fund’s quarter-end value in the stock rose by $74.83 million, reflecting both trading activity and market price changes.

What else to knowBlack Creek’s increased stake brings its FTI Consulting position to 9.09% of 13F reportable AUM.Top five holdings after the filing:NYSE:ELAN: $250.32 million (12.4% of AUM)NYSE:BAH: $211.34 million (10.5% of AUM)NASDAQ:PSMT: $201.01 million (10.0% of AUM)NASDAQ:PYPL: $187.56 million (9.3% of AUM)NYSE:FCN: $183.17 million (9.1% of AUM)As of February 12, 2026, FTI Consulting shares were priced at $160.91; the stock fell 16.1% over the past year, underperforming the S&P 500 by 29.04 percentage points.Company overviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close February 12, 2026)$160.91Market capitalization$5.31 billionRevenue (TTM)$3.69 billionNet income (TTM)$266.05 millionCompany snapshotFTI Consulting offers business advisory services across five segments, including corporate finance and restructuring, forensic and litigation consulting, economic consulting, technology, and strategic communications.The company generates revenue by providing specialized consulting solutions to manage change, mitigate risk, and resolve disputes for organizations globally.It serves a diversified client base spanning industries such as aerospace, financial services, healthcare, energy, real estate, and the public sector.FTI Consulting is a leading global provider of business advisory services, with a strong presence across multiple industries. The company leverages deep sector expertise and multidisciplinary teams to address complex business challenges, driving value for clients through transformation, risk mitigation, and dispute resolution. Its diversified service portfolio and global reach underpin its competitive position in the consulting services sector.

What this transaction means for investorsIn October, FTI Consulting posted record third-quarter revenue of $956.2 million, up 3% year over year, and record diluted EPS of $2.60, up 41%. The firm’s corporate finance and forensic segments both delivered double-digit revenue growth, while adjusted EBITDA margin expanded to 13.7%. Management also raised full-year 2025 EPS guidance to $7.62 to $8.12, with adjusted EPS projected as high as $8.70.

That backdrop matters. This is a firm with diversified exposure across restructuring, litigation, and strategic communications, not a single product tech bet. Within the portfolio, the position now represents 9.1% of reportable AUM, placing it alongside core holdings such as ELAN, BAH, and FCN itself in the top tier of conviction ideas.

Long-term investors should focus less on the past 12-month price chart and more on earnings durability. Consulting demand tied to restructuring and regulatory complexity rarely disappears. When profits hit records and shares retreat, that tension can create opportunity.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Booz Allen Hamilton, FTI Consulting, and PayPal. The Motley Fool recommends Nutrien and recommends the following options: long January 2027 $42.50 calls on PayPal and short March 2026 $65 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

NEW YORK, Feb. 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG) between January 17, 2025 and November 13, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important April 3, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Plug Power securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Plug Power class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1011 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had materially overstated the likelihood that funds attributed to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Loan would ultimately become available to Plug Power, and/or that Plug Power would ultimately construct the hydrogen production facilities necessary to receive those funds; (2) as such, Plug Power was likely to pivot toward more modest projects with less commercial upside; and (3) as a result, Plug Power’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Plug Power class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1011 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com