Finex logo
Finex Intelligence

Market Signal Briefing

Wire-ready dashboard awaiting your first source connection.

Last news saved at Mar 30, 13:54 1mo ago Cron last ran Mar 30, 13:54 1mo ago Awaiting first source
Switch language
91,488 Stories ingested Auto-fetched market intel nonstop.
0 Distinct tickers Add sources to start tracking symbols
Trending sources Waiting for fresh intel
Hot tickers Surfacing from current coverage
Details Saved Published Title Source Tickers
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:43 1mo ago
Gold Resource Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 stocknewsapi
GORO
DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Gold Resource Corporation (NYSE American: GORO) (the “Company”) is pleased to announce its full-year operational results from its Don David Gold Mine (“DDGM”) near Oaxaca, Mexico, and a corporate update on its other activities. “We are pleased to report a successful operational turnaround during 2025 that culminated in a strong fourth quarter finish and over $25 million in cash and equivalents on the balance sheet,” said Allen Palmiere, President and CEO. “Obviously, fa.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:43 1mo ago
Nvidia Launches AI for Hospital Operating Rooms stocknewsapi
NVDA
By PYMNTS  |  March 18, 2026

 | 

Robots are coming to hospitals, but they are not there to replace surgeons. Instead, they observe, coordinate and carry loads, tasks that consume large amounts of clinical staff time and require far less judgment than the work surgeons spend years training to perform.

That distinction is central to Nvidia’s latest push into healthcare. The company this week released what it describes as the first open platform built specifically for healthcare robotics, a stack of datasets, simulation tools and vision-language-action models designed to train artificial intelligence systems on surgical environments and deploy them in real clinical workflows.

In a company release, Nvidia said Johnson & Johnson MedTech, CMR Surgical, PeritasAI and Proximie are among the first adopters building on the platform.

The use cases fall into two categories. One is AI that watches surgery and surfaces information to clinicians in real time. The other is AI that handles the coordination work that fills a hospital’s hours between procedures.

That focus reflects a broader shift in how automation is entering healthcare. As outlined by Forbes, hospitals are turning to robotics to manage repetitive, coordination-heavy tasks as staffing shortages and cost pressures intensify.

The workforce pressure behind that shift is well-documented. The World Health Organization projects a global shortfall of 10 million health workers by 2030, while U.S. hospitals report operating below capacity due to staffing constraints. Those dynamics are making hospital administrators more willing to deploy automation in parts of the workflow that were previously considered too complex or too sensitive.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

Second Set of Eyes The most closely watched application is intraoperative assistance, where AI systems analyze live surgical video and surface real-time insights without directly controlling instruments.

Proximie is building in this direction, using Nvidia’s synthetic data tools to train models that combine still operating room images with live video. The goal is to identify anatomy, track procedural progress and provide contextual guidance to surgeons as procedures unfold.

We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

The underlying infrastructure is designed to address a long-standing bottleneck in robotics: access to training data. Nvidia’s Open-H dataset includes 776 hours of surgical video collected from 35 organizations across multiple robotic systems and procedures. By pooling data across the ecosystem, developers can train models that generalize across environments rather than learning from narrow, proprietary datasets.

Simulation extends that capability further. Nvidia’s Cosmos-H models generate synthetic surgical data, allowing developers to test edge cases and rare scenarios without relying solely on real-world footage. The approach compresses development timelines and reduces iteration costs, enabling faster progress toward deployment.

The line Nvidia and its partners are drawing is deliberate. AI that observes and informs operates within a different regulatory and risk framework than AI that acts. Most current deployments focus on assistance, not autonomy, positioning these systems as a second set of eyes rather than a replacement for surgical expertise.

Logistics Work The second category is less visible but potentially more immediate in its impact. Hospitals run on coordination: moving patients, tracking instruments, managing sterilization cycles and allocating equipment across departments. These tasks are high-volume, time-sensitive and largely handled by human staff.

PeritasAI is targeting this layer, training systems to manage instrument handling, sterile field coordination and operating room logistics. These are areas where automation can be deployed with lower clinical risk and faster return on investment.

The economic case is straightforward. Administrative and coordination tasks consume a significant share of hospital labor but do not require specialized clinical training. Automating them can free up staff time, improve throughput and reduce delays across the system.

For device makers, simulation introduces another advantage. Johnson & Johnson MedTech is using Nvidia’s platform to generate training data for its MONARCH system, reducing reliance on physical testing. In simulation, hundreds of scenarios can be run in minutes rather than days, accelerating development cycles for systems that would otherwise require extensive real-world validation.

For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:45 1mo ago
RARE DEADLINE ALERT: ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - RARE stocknewsapi
RARE
NEW YORK, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (NASDAQ: RARE) between August 3, 2023 and December 26, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important April 6, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Ultragenyx common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Ultragenyx class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52472 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 6, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants provided investors with material information concerning Ultragenyx’s expected results for its Phase III Orbit and Cosmic Studies, which tested setrusumab (UX 143) in patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta (“OI”). Defendants’ statements included, among other things, confidence in setrusumab’s ability to ultimately trigger a decrease in the OI patients’ annualized fracture rate, alongside confidence in the study designs to demonstrate such ability and reduce testing variability that could interfere with such a result.

The lawsuit claims that defendants provided these overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while simultaneously disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of setrusumab’s potential, as well as the true risk inherent in the study protocols put forth; notably, that while setrusumab does increase material bone density, this increase does not correlate to a decrease in annualized fracture rates or otherwise, that the Phase III Orbit and Cosmic studies were much less likely to be able to demonstrate such a link than management claimed. The lawsuit claims that such statements absent these material facts caused Ultragenyx shareholders to purchase Ultragenyx securities at artificially inflated prices. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Ultragenyx class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52472 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:45 1mo ago
Huntsman Marks Grand Opening of Operational Unit Expansion in Petfurdo, Hungary stocknewsapi
HUN
, /PRNewswire/ -- Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) today celebrated the grand opening of its expanded Performance Products manufacturing facility in Petfurdo, Hungary, where operations were initiated at the beginning of this year. The successful completion of this investment increases Huntsman's global capacity providing greater flexibility, and innovative technologies for the polyurethane, coatings, metalworking and electronics industries.

One of the world's leading amine catalyst producers with over 50 years of experience in urethane chemicals, Huntsman has seen demand for its JEFFCAT® amine catalysts continue to grow across the globe. These specialty amines are used in everyday applications such as automobile seats, mattresses and energy‑efficient insulation for buildings. Huntsman's latest product portfolio supports industry efforts to save energy, lower emissions and reduce odors in consumer products.

"This new capacity builds on our long‑standing investments in Performance Products and strengthens our ability to support customers in fast‑growing and evolving markets," said Jan Buberl, President, Huntsman Performance Products. "The expansion unit enhances our manufacturing flexibility, enables next‑generation products and reflects our continued focus on sustainability, operational excellence and long‑term value creation. As demand grows for cleaner, more efficient solutions, this investment positions us to respond with speed, innovation and reliability."

The project, supported by an investment grant from the Hungarian government, reflects the community's confidence in Huntsman and our shared commitment to future growth. Government officials joined the celebration to mark this investment in the region's long‑term success.

"We greatly appreciate the support of the Hungarian government and value the strong partnership that helped bring this project to completion," Buberl added. "We look forward to continuing our collaboration as we advance economic development and manufacturing excellence in Hungary."

JEFFCAT® is a registered trademark of Huntsman Corporation or an affiliate thereof in one or more, but not all, countries.

About Huntsman:
Huntsman Corporation is a publicly traded global manufacturer and marketer of diversified chemical products with 2025 revenues of approximately $6 billion from our continuing operations. Our chemical products number in the thousands and are sold worldwide to manufacturers serving a broad and diverse range of consumer and industrial end markets. We operate more than 55 manufacturing, R&D and operations facilities in approximately 25 countries and employ approximately 6,000 associates within our continuing operations. For more information about Huntsman, please visit the company's website at www.huntsman.com.

Social Media:
X: http://www.x.com/Huntsman_Corp
Facebook: www.facebook.com/huntsmancorp
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/huntsman

Forward-Looking Statements:
Certain information in this release constitutes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on management's current beliefs and expectations. The forward-looking statements in this release are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances and involve risks and uncertainties that may affect the company's operations, markets, products, services, prices and other factors as discussed under the caption "Risk Factors" in the Huntsman companies' filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Significant risks and uncertainties may relate to, but are not limited to, volatile global economic conditions, cyclical and volatile product markets, disruptions in production at manufacturing facilities, reorganization or restructuring of Huntsman's operations, including any delay of, or other negative developments affecting the ability to implement cost reductions, timing of proposed transactions, and manufacturing optimization improvements in Huntsman businesses and realize anticipated cost savings, and other financial, economic, competitive, environmental, political, legal, regulatory and technological factors. The company assumes no obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by applicable laws.

SOURCE Huntsman Corporation
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:45 1mo ago
Energy Transfer: Strong Yield Backed By Growth, Not Harvesting stocknewsapi
ET
HomeStock IdeasLong IdeasEnergy Analysis

SummaryEnergy Transfer is in a multi-year growth phase, balancing scale, stability, and long-term demand visibility with ongoing capex-driven expansion.ET offers an attractive 7%+ yield, strong dividend coverage, and guided 3-5% annual distribution growth, supported by robust fee-based cash flows.Valuation is not deeply discounted but remains reasonable, with consensus forecasting 28% EPS growth in 2026 and low double-digit total return potential.Execution risk from simultaneous large projects and leverage discipline temper a Strong Buy, but current fundamentals and visible growth support a Buy rating. Zhanna Hapanovich/iStock via Getty Images

Energy Transfer (ET) today is a business that has achieved scale and stability, secured long-term demand visibility, and is going through a multi-year growth execution phase. But it has not yet transformed into a purer cash

3.53K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:46 1mo ago
Acquihires, often used by Big Tech, are a 'red flag,' DOJ antitrust head says stocknewsapi
NVDA
A GroqNode rack is installed by a member of the Groq team at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, U.S., March, 2023. Groq Inc./Amanda Dalton/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

CompaniesMarch 18 (Reuters) - Companies’ efforts to sidestep U.S. antitrust scrutiny through tactics such as “acquihires” - a strategy some Big ​Tech firms use to snap up talent at artificial ‌intelligence startups - are a “red flag,” the top U.S. antitrust enforcer told Reuters on Wednesday.

Acquihires, where the world's biggest technology firms pay ​large sums in deals with promising startups to ​take their technology and talent, but stop short of ⁠formally acquiring the target, are increasingly being viewed by antitrust regulators ​as an attempt to evade merger rules. In one ​recent example, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab in December agreed to license chip technology from startup Groq and hire its CEO, without buying the company.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

When companies make acquisitions, ​they hand over information about a proposed transaction to ​federal antitrust enforcers. "Acquihires" allow companies to essentially absorb other firms without ‌going ⁠through that formal merger review process.

"When I see conduct that appears aimed to circumvent that process, as a litigator, as an enforcer, that's more of a red flag to ​me than if ​you had ⁠just participated and complied" with the review process, said Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed ​Assefi.

He said companies should be willing to engage ​in ⁠the merger review process. That way, the DOJ can quickly understand and address any concerns, or, if the deal has ⁠no ​competitive issues, end its review early ​and let the deal close, he said.

Assefi declined to discuss ongoing matters ​or particular companies.

Reporting by Jody Godoy; editing by David Gaffen

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Jody Godoy reports on tech policy and antitrust enforcement, including how regulators are responding to the rise of AI. Reach her at [email protected]
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:48 1mo ago
ROSEN, NATIONAL INVESTOR RIGHTS LAWYERS, Encourages PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - PFSI stocknewsapi
PFSI
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (NYSE: PFSI) resulting from allegations that PennyMac may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased PennyMac securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51887 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On January 29, 2026, PennyMac filed a Current Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K announcing PennyMac's fourth quarter and full-year 2025 financial results. The report stated that PennyMac's "servicing segment pretax income was $37.3 million, down from $157.4 million in the prior quarter and $87.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024," as well as "[retax income excluding valuation-related items was $47.8 million, down 70 percent from the prior quarter driven primarily by increased realization of mortgage servicing rights (MSR) cash flows as lower mortgage rates drove higher prepayment activity."

On this news, PennyMac's stock price fell $49.78 per share, or 33.3%, to close at $99.92 per share on January 30, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289108

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:48 1mo ago
GO Stockholder Alert: Shareholder Rights Law Firm Robbins LLP Reminds Investors of the Class Action Lawsuit Against Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. stocknewsapi
GO
, /PRNewswire/ -- Robbins LLP reminds stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: GO) securities between August 5, 2025 and March 4, 2026. Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. operates as a retailer of consumables and fresh products sold through independently operated stores in the United States.

For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003.

The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) Misled Investors Regarding its Financial and Operational Growth

According to the complaint, during the class period, defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) the Company had "expanded too quickly" into new stores; (2) the Company's purportedly strong financial and operational growth was being artificially supported by excessive rapid store expansion; (3) as a result, the Company was unable to achieve the sustainable growth required to meet its previously set guidance; (4) the Company's Restructuring Plan would require further Optimization to achieve its operational goals, including significant store closures and asset write-downs; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Plaintiff alleges that on March 4, 2026, Grocery Outlet announced disappointing results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2025, revealing the Company's full year financial results, which missed guidance on nearly every major financial metric. On this news, Grocery Outlet's stock price fell $2.45, or 27.9%, to close at $6.34 per share on March 5, 2026.

What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. Shareholders who wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the class must submit their papers to the court by May 15, 2026. The lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses. 

About Robbins LLP: A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002. 

To be notified if a class action against Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

SOURCE Robbins LLP
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:48 1mo ago
ALIT Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Alight, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit stocknewsapi
ALIT
, /PRNewswire/ -- 

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Alight, Inc. (NYSE: ALIT) between November 12, 2024 and February 18, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 15, 2026.

So what: If you purchased Alight common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Alight class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=54542 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 15, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose facts concerning the true state of Alight's growth potential and financial stability; notably, that Alight was not truly equipped to execute on its claimed potential and could not maintain its promised dividend as a result. Rather, Alight would require significantly higher compensation and incentive expenses to achieve the projections put forth by management. Throughout the class period, defendants announced disappointing results, reduced projections, and multiple goodwill impairments all while remaining confident in their ability to execute, drive growth, and continue to provide a dividend to their shareholders. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Alight class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=54542 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:48 1mo ago
WTPI: From Defensive Income To Volatility Alpha Engine stocknewsapi
WTPI
HomeETFs and Funds AnalysisETF Analysis

SummaryWisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund ETF (WTPI) is upgraded to Strong Buy, reflecting its superior performance and systematic, transparent option strategy.WTPI's twice-monthly, fully covered put-writing on the S&P 500, backed by T-bills, delivers robust income and downside protection with minimal manager discretion.WTPI has outperformed both JEPI and the S&P 500 during market consolidation and corrections, with rare underperformance only in sharp, rapid rallies or crashes.Current market conditions—moderate growth, intermittent volatility, and meaningful interest rates—favor WTPI's premium harvesting strategy for the remainder of 2026. Artur Didyk/iStock via Getty Images

In June last year, I had found the WisdomTree Equity Premium Income Fund ETF (WTPI) a Buy because of some unique offerings that stood out within the option based income strategy ETFs. The

3.53K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:48 1mo ago
URNM: Strong Government And Private Push For Nuclear Revival stocknewsapi
URNM
729 Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:49 1mo ago
ROSEN, NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS, Encourages Oracle Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - ORCL stocknewsapi
ORCL
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) between June 12, 2025, and December 16, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 6, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Oracle common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Oracle class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51135 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 6, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Oracle's AI infrastructure strategy would result in massive increases in capital expenditures ("CapEx") without equivalent, near-term growth in revenue; (2) Oracle's substantially increased spending created serious risks involving Oracle's debt and credit rating, free cash flow, and ability to fund its projects, among other concerns; and (3) as a result, defendants' representations about Oracle's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Oracle class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51135 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289083

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:49 1mo ago
US oil exports seen rising as WTI discount to Brent hits widest in 11 years stocknewsapi
BNO DBO GUSH IEO OIH OIL PXJ UCO USO XOP
A drone view of a pump jack and drilling rig south of Midland, Texas, U.S. June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Eli Hartman/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryU.S.-Israeli war on Iran disrupts Middle East oil supplyBrent gains outpace WTI due to Mideast infrastructure attacksUS to release172 million barrels to tame prices, pressuring WTIHOUSTON/New York, March 18 (Reuters) - The discount for U.S. crude futures versus Brent on Wednesday hit ​the widest in 11 years, as attacks on Middle Eastern oil infrastructure drove the global benchmark higher while rising supply ‌in the U.S. set the stage for a jump in oil exports.

The U.S-Israeli war on Iran has thrown global oil markets into turmoil, driving crude and fuel prices to multi-year highs as a key trade route has mostly closed and some energy output in the Middle East is shut. The surge in Brent relative to U.S. crude ​futures creates an arbitrage opportunity for traders looking to fetch a profit by moving oil to higher-priced markets.

The Reuters Power Up newsletter provides everything you need to know about the global energy industry. Sign up here.

U.S. West Texas ​Intermediate crude traded at as much as a $12.05 a barrel discount to Brent during the session on Wednesday, ⁠its largest since March 2015.

Even with freight prices for an Aframax carrying up to 700,000 barrels of crude from the U.S. Gulf ​Coast to Europe jumping to about $6 million on Wednesday from $4.36 million before the war, the arbitrage remains open because the WTI/Brent spread is wide enough ​to offset the cost of freight, according to Georgios Sakellariou, chartering analyst at Signal Maritime.

"Today we saw more crude cargoes getting picked up from the U.S. Gulf Coast for loading in March to the start of April because of the widening WTI/Brent spread," Sakellariou said, adding that they expect more ballast vessels will ​head to the U.S. in the coming days to load crude for Europe.

BRENT'S GAINS OUTPACE WTIBrent surged by 3.8% on Wednesday after ​Iran threatened to hit Gulf energy targets and Iran's huge South Pars gas field was struck in an attack. WTI rose by 0.1%.

"Brent is ripping on South ‌Pars; I ⁠think infrastructure attacks will be the main driver of more Brent rallies rather than anything else, and that tends to be reflected in Brent over WTI," said Neil Crosby, Sparta Commodities analyst.

The U.S.-Israeli on Iran and Tehran's attacks on Gulf neighbors have disrupted oil and natural gas exports from the Middle East and forced production stoppages.

"WTI looks extremely cheap in our arbs now and will go nicely to Europe," Crosby ​said. "Prices today suggest the flow should ​be maxed," he said, adding ⁠that U.S. crude loadings for export will likely rise in the next few weeks, given the current WTI/Brent spread.

Weighing on WTI, countries in the International Energy Agency agreed to release 400 million barrels of crude from ​reserves in an effort to tame prices, with the U.S. set to release 172 million barrels ​from the SPR, and ⁠that is putting pressure on WTI, said Rohit Rathod, a senior analyst at Vortexa.

Meanwhile, U.S. crude stocks at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery and pricing point for West Texas Intermediate crude futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange, rose last week to 27.52 million barrels, their highest since August ⁠2024, the ​Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday. This build in Cushing inventory along with the ​SPR release is suppressing WTI, a trader said.

Growing demand to export crude from the U.S., which boosts freight prices, could close the arbitrage window as the shipping economics ​become unworkable, capping how much crude leaves the U.S.

Reporting by Georgina McCartney in Houston and Siddharth Cavale in New York; Editing by David Gregorio

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:50 1mo ago
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Barclays PLC Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - BCS stocknewsapi
BCS
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Barclays PLC (NYSE: BCS) resulting from allegations that Barclays may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Barclays securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=23523 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On February 27, 2026, Reuters published an article entitled "Wall Street hit by UK mortgage lender collapse, raising fears of more credit 'cockroaches.'" The article stated that lenders were "rocked by the implosion of little-known UK mortgage provider Market Financial Solutions Ltd ["MFS"], fuelling concerns about wider losses among banks and reviving warnings of more "cockroaches" in the booming private credit industry." It further stated that another publication "reported Barclays has a 600 million pound ($809.70 million) exposure to MFS."

On this news, Barclays American Depositary Shares ("ADS") fell 3.99% on February 27, 2026, and 2.3% on March 2, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289086

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:51 1mo ago
ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages Hub Group, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation - HUBG stocknewsapi
HUBG
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Hub Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HUBG) resulting from allegations that Hub Group may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Hub Group securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52777 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On February 5, 2026, after market hours, Hub Group filed a Current Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K announcing preliminary financial results for the full year and fourth quarter ended December 31, 2025. The report stated that "[i]n connection with the preparation of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company identified an error that resulted in the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable in the first nine months of 2025." As a result of the error, Hub Group "plans to restate its financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2025."

On this news, Hub Group's stock price fell $9.37 per share, or 18.3%, to close at $41.96 per share on February 6, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289087

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:51 1mo ago
Mr. Market Refused To Reward Jabil For Stellar Progress, But You Should stocknewsapi
JBL
36.8K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:52 1mo ago
Nation Gold Completes 100% Acquisition of the Bonito Gold-Silver Project in New Mexico and Concurrent Non-Brokered Private Placement stocknewsapi
NATNF
Project Highlights

Acquisition of a 100% interest in the Bonito Gold-Silver Project in New MexicoPrevious operators (Pioneer Metals and Placer Dome) have invested approximately US$10 million in exploration work, including 3,000 metres across 75 drill holes of historical shallow drilling (1985-1989)(1)Potential near-surface gold-silver system with no modern drilling since 1990. Gold-silver breccia pipes sitting above a potential copper-molybdenum porphyry system remains completely untested at depth below 120 metresNew Mexico: Mining-friendly state, a leading jurisdiction in the United States with proven endowment of precious and base metal deposits and operating mines, and a long history of mineral exploration and developmentNearby infrastructure with paved and forest service road access from the town of RuidosoAs of a March 2025 Executive Order, gold and silver are now considered strategic minerals by the federal government of the United StatesVancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - Nation Gold Corp. (CSE: NATN) (OTCQB: NATNF) (the "Company" or "Nation") is pleased to announce that, further to its news release dated February 4, 2026, the Company has completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Bonito gold-silver project (the "Bonito Project") in the Nogal-Bonito Mining District of New Mexico, USA through its wholly-owned subsidiary Nation Gold US Corp. ("Nation Gold US") pursuant to the terms of the mineral property purchase and sale agreement dated February 3, 2026 (the "Purchase Agreement") with Cannon Bridge Capital Corp. ("Cannon Bridge"), Stream Metals LLC, Nation Gold US and an arm's length individual.

Mr. Mark Bailey, CEO & Director of the Company, stated, "The 100% acquisition of the Bonito Project marks an important milestone for Nation Gold, as we establish our presence with a flagship U.S. asset in the historically productive Nogal-Bonito Mining District of New Mexico. The Bonito Project may potentially host a gold-silver system with significant untested upside, historic underground production and prior exploration by Pioneer Metals and Placer Dome, yet remains largely underexplored at depth and without ever seeing modern drilling or exploration techniques. Nation has the objective of completing its first modern drill program following receipt of the necessary permits. With this transaction complete and the concurrent financing in place, we look forward to advancing exploration planning and working toward our first drill program at Bonito."

As consideration for the acquisition, the Company has paid an aggregate of $200,000 in cash to date with the remaining cash consideration of $100,000 payable on the date that is the later of: (i) Nation Gold US receiving an initial drill permit on the Bonito Project; and (ii) 18 months from the closing date.

The Company will also issue an aggregate of 13,000,000 common shares in the capital of the Company (the "Consideration Shares") to certain nominees of Cannon Bridge at a deemed issue price of $0.20 per Consideration Share once the Company has completed the administrative process to record the claims for the Bonito Project in the name of Nation Gold US. The Consideration Shares will be subject to a statutory four-month hold period from the date of issuance in accordance with applicable securities laws, as well as an extended hold period of up to 18 months from the date of issuance based on the schedule described in the Company's press release dated February 4, 2026 in accordance with the policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange (the "Exchange"). The Company received the approval of the Exchange for the acquisition of the Bonito Project.

Non-Brokered Private Placement

The Company also announces that it has completed its non-brokered private placement (the "Offering") consisting in the issuance of 7,800,000 units (each, a "Unit") at a purchase price of $0.20 per Unit for gross proceeds to the Company of $1,560,000. Each Unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole warrant, a "Warrant"). Each Warrant is exercisable by the holder thereof to purchase one common share of the Company at an exercise price of $0.25 until March 18, 2028.

In connection with the Offering, the Company paid aggregate cash finder's fees of $79,600 and issued an aggregate of 398,000 non-transferable finder warrants (each, a "Finder Warrant") to arm's length finders of the Company in consideration for the finders locating purchasers to participate in the Offering. Each Finder Warrant is exercisable by the holder thereof to purchase one common share of the Company at an exercise price of $0.20 until March 18, 2028.

The Company intends to use the proceeds of the Offering for general working capital purposes.

The securities issued in connection with the Offering are subject to a four-month hold period expiring on July 19, 2026 in accordance with applicable securities laws and the rules of the Exchange.

The securities described herein have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act"), or any state securities laws, and accordingly, may not be offered or sold within the United States except in compliance with the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities requirements or pursuant to exemptions therefrom. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any securities in any jurisdiction.

Sources & References:
(1) Approximately US$10 million has been estimated in project expenditures.

Qualified Person & Disclosure

All scientific and technical information contained in this news release is historical in nature unless otherwise stated. The technical content contained in this news release has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). The scientific and technical information contained in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Mark Bailey, P.Geo., CEO & Director of the Company and a Qualified Person ("QP") as defined under NI 43-101. Mr. Bailey is not independent of the Company. Mr. Bailey has not verified the historical exploration data disclosed in this press release, including the sampling, analytical and test data, as such data is historical and the original data is not readily available.

The Company cautions that mineral exploration is speculative, and there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to unlock value from the Bonito Project or that the Bonito Project will prove economically feasible.

About Nation Gold Corp.

Nation Gold Corp. is an exploration company based in Vancouver, BC. The Company recently acquired a 100% interest in the Bonito Project in the Nogal-Bonito Mining District of New Mexico, USA. The Bonito Project was formerly in production in the late 1800s and has seen limited modern exploration, most recently in the 1980s and 1990s by Pioneer Metals and Placer Dome. The Company is led by a team of mining, exploration and capital markets professionals focused on acquiring potential multi-million-ounce precious metals deposits in Tier 1 mining jurisdictions. The Company also has a 100% interest in the Cattle Creek Project located near Vernon, BC. For further information, please visit the Company's website at www.nationgold.ca.

On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company

Mark Bailey, CEO & Director

Contact Information - For more information, please contact:

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements. Generally forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as "anticipate", "will", "expect", "may", "continue", "could", "estimate", "forecast", "plan", "potential" and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding use of proceeds for the Offering, the potential mineralization on the Bonito Project, the recording of the claims for the Bonito Project in the name of Nation Gold US, the Company's intended drill program on the Bonito Project and the business and anticipated financial performance of the Company. These statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include but are not limited to, risks related to the recording of the claims for the Bonito Project which may delay or impair the ability of the Company to complete its intended work programs; risks inherent in exploration activities; the impact of exploration competition; unexpected geological or hydrological conditions; changes in government regulations and policies, including trade laws and policies; failure to obtain necessary permits and approvals from government authorities; volatility and sensitivity to market prices; volatility and sensitivity to capital market fluctuations; the ability to raise funds through financings; environmental and safety risks including increased regulatory burdens; weather and other natural phenomena; and other exploration, development, operating, financial market and regulatory risks; and general economic conditions. Accordingly, the actual events may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of the date hereof or the dates specifically referenced in this press release, where applicable. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, oral or written, made by itself or on its behalf, unless otherwise required pursuant to applicable laws.

NOT FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES OR FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. WIRE SERVICES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289120

Source: Nation Gold Corp.

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:57 1mo ago
ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Picard Medical, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - PMI stocknewsapi
PMI
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Picard Medical, Inc. (NYSE American: PMI) between September 2, 2025 and October 31, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 13, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Picard Medical securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Picard Medical class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52263 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 13, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about Picard's business, operations, and the true nature of its securities trading throughout the Class Period. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Picard was the subject of a fraudulent stock promotion scheme involving social media-based misinformation and impersonated financial professionals; (2) insiders and/or affiliates used offshore or nominee accounts to facilitate the coordinated dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign; (3) Picard's public statements and risk disclosures omitted any mention of the false rumors and artificial trading activity driving the stock price; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Picard's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

To join the Picard Medical class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=52263 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289093

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:57 1mo ago
Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust Declares Q1 Distribution stocknewsapi
ADLRF
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES.
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS RESTRICTION MAY CONSTITUTE A VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES SECURITIES LAW.

CALGARY, Alberta, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust (“Alaris” or the “Trust”) (TSX: AD.UN) announces that the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) has declared a trust distribution (“Distribution”) of $0.37 per trust unit for the first quarter of 2026, representing $1.48 per unit on an annualized basis. The Distribution is payable on April 15, 2026 to unitholders of record on March 31, 2026.

About Alaris:

The Trust, through its subsidiaries, invests in a diversified group of private businesses ("Private Company Partners") primarily through structured equity. The primary goal of our structured equity investments is to deliver stable and predictable returns to our unitholders through both cash distributions and capital appreciation. This strategy is enhanced by common equity positions, which allow us to generate returns in alignment with the founders of our Private Company Partners.

For further information please contact:
Investor Relations
P: (403) 260-1457
[email protected]

Alaris Equity Partners Income Trust
Suite 250, 333 24th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2S 3E6
www.alarisequitypartners.com
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:59 1mo ago
Cavvy Energy Releases 2025 Q4 and Full Year Financial and Operating Results, 2025 Reserves, and Repays US$27 Million Debt in Q1 2026 stocknewsapi
PTOAF
Not For Distribution to United States News Wire Services or Dissemination in United States

CALGARY, Alberta, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Cavvy Energy Ltd. (“Cavvy” or the “Company”) (TSX:CVVY) is pleased to announce the release of its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial and operating results. The Company produced 23,904 boe/d and generated Net Operating Income1 (“NOI”) of $110.5 million during 2025. The Company produced 23,003 boe/d and generated NOI of $20.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2025 with an exit production rate of 24,569 boe/d.

During the first quarter of 2026, Cavvy repaid US$27.0 million of long-term debt, resulting in an undrawn senior revolving facility (US$22.0 million capacity), senior term loan balance of US$55.3 million, and subordinated loan balance of US$33.6 million at March 31, 2026.

2025 ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS

Generated NOI of $110.5 million ($0.38 per basic and fully diluted share) and Funds Flow from Operations1 of $62.6 million ($0.22 per basic and fully diluted share).Produced 23,904 boe/d (80% natural gas), 14% lower than 2024 primarily reflecting the ongoing voluntary shut-in of dry natural gas tied-in to third-party gas processing facilities, which impacted annual production by 8,700 boe/d in 2025. Processed 122.0 MMcf/d of third-party raw natural gas, an increase of 56.5 MMcf/d (86%) from 2024. This delivered an increase in third-party processing and marketing revenues of 92% to $38.8 million.Reduced Net Debt1 by $26.9 million from 2024 to $170.6 million through repayment of long-term debt and reduction in the non-cash working capital deficit.Reduced operating expenses by $21.0 million (11%) to $164.8 million compared to 2024, primarily due to lower third-party processing costs following the voluntary shut-in of volumes in Central AB along with ongoing cost reductions.Recorded year-end 2025 NI 51-101 2P reserves of 260.5 MMboe (+7% compared to 2024) and 2P PV10 reserve value of $1,505.9 million (+20% compared to 2024) at the Jan. 1, 2026 IC4 price forecast, highlighted by an industry-leading PDP base decline of 5.9% and 2P RLI of 25.8 years.Rebranded to Cavvy Energy Ltd. in May 2025, completing the strategic pivot to affirm our identity as a western Canadian focused energy company.
Q4 2025 HIGHLIGHTS

Generated NOI of $20.8 million ($0.07 per basic and fully diluted share) and Funds Flow from Operations2 of $13.5 million ($0.05 per basic and fully diluted share).Produced 23,003 boe/d (81% natural gas), up 2% from Q4 2024. Restarted 2,770 mcf/d of natural gas production in Northeast BC as AECO pricing rose above break even thresholds.Increased third-party raw gas processing volumes by 83% to 136.6 MMcf/d compared to fourth quarter of 2024. This resulted in a 135% increase in third-party gathering, processing and marketing revenue, or $7.2 million, for the quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.Incurred reclamation and abandonment expenditures of $5.8 million, focused on asset retirement liability reduction in winter-access properties in Northeast BC.Entered into a 12-month structured sulphur pricing agreement for 2026 (the “Sulphur Pricing Agreement”), to partially mitigate the risk of sulphur price volatility while retaining the ability to participate in the spot sulphur market. “Successful execution of our strategy led to strong performance in 2025 and created the foundation for the next phase of Cavvy’s growth” stated Darcy Reding, President and CEO. “Our focus on run-time reliability, operational excellence, third-party processing revenue growth, and debt repayment drove the strong operational and financial performance reflected in our year-end results.

Compared to 2024, we reduced operating expenses by $21.0 million, grew third-party gathering and processing revenues by $18.6 million, and reduced net debt by $26.9 million, in aggregate resulting in over $100 million of net debt reduction since Q1 2022. In conjunction with new exposure to higher sulphur market pricing in 2026, our revenue stream is now more diverse than ever, improving the resiliency and financial flexibility of the Company.

We are successfully positioning Cavvy for sustainable, long-term value creation and look forward to delivering another year of debt reduction and return for our shareholders.”

SUBSEQUENT TO Q4 2025

On January 6, 2026, Cavvy received a cash payment of approximately USD$26.7 million representing the prepayment of a portion of sulphur sales expected over the first half of 2026 at a predefined price in accordance with the terms of the Sulphur Pricing Agreement (the “Prepayment”), which was previously disclosed with our Q3 2025 financial results on November 6, 2025. With proceeds from the Prepayment, Cavvy repaid the full USD$18.1 million outstanding balance of the senior revolving loan in January 2026 and an additional USD$8.9 million of the senior term loan during the first quarter of 2026, resulting in interest expense savings over 2026 and accelerating progress towards the Company’s year-end debt and leverage targets.

Simultaneously, the Company recognized deferred revenue of approximately $36.2 million representing the obligation to deliver sulphur volumes, which will be reduced monthly between January and June 2026 as volumes are delivered.

On March 12, 2026, Cavvy announced the exercise of common share purchase warrants (the “Warrants”) held by 2652862 Alberta Ltd., an affiliate of Erikson National Energy Inc. (“Erikson”), for proceeds of $3.5 million in exchange for the issuance of 5,120,235 common shares.

Selected 2025 Financial and Operating Highlights

($ 000s unless otherwise noted)2025 2024 2023 Production   Natural gas (mcf/d)114,730 139,710 168,821 Condensate (bbl/d)2,320 2,397 2,339 NGLs (bbl/d)2,462 2,082 2,296 Total production (boe/d)(1)23,904 27,763 32,772 Sulphur (mt/d)1,078 1,319 1,306 Third-party volumes processed (mcf/d)(2)122,013 65,475 60,834 Reserves   Net proved plus probable (“2P”) reserves NPV10(3)1,505,907 1,252,170 1,371,735 Proved developed producing (“PDP”) reserves NPV10(3)711,083 621,393 614,072 2P reserve life index (“RLI”, years)25.83 25.08 20.38 Financial   Natural Gas Price ($/mcf)   Realized before Risk Management Contracts(4)
1.74 1.58 2.67 Realized after Risk Management Contracts(4)3.65 3.15 3.67 Benchmark natural gas price1.68 1.45 2.63 Condensate Price ($/bbl)   Realized before Risk Management Contracts(4)85.08 94.48 97.01 Realized after Risk Management Contracts(4)84.59 86.73 95.55 Benchmark condensate price88.54 100.02 102.73 Sulphur Price ($/mt)   Realized sulphur price(5)31.68 13.52 21.86 Benchmark sulphur price USD (Vancouver FOB)285.35 94.04 94.18 Revenue(6)293,838 268,840 374,029 Net Income(3,151)(38,905)8,981 Net (loss) Income $ per share basic(0.01)(0.20)0.06 Net (loss) Income $ per share diluted(0.01)(0.20)0.04 Net operating income(7)110,457 64,608 130,929 Cashflow provided by operating activities36,453 7,132 104,202 Funds flow from operations
62,625 19,115
 85,692 Operating netback ($/boe)(7)12.66 6.35 10.95 Total assets540,136 612,423 638,541 Adjusted working capital (deficit)(7)(19,769)(29,777)(31,830)Net debt(7)(170,617)(197,564)(204,046)Non-current liabilities290,762 326,853 300,261 Capital expenditures(8)23,359 25,697 55,539 (1)  Total production excludes sulphur.
(2)  Third-party volumes processed are raw natural gas volumes reported by activity month.
(3)  Estimated pre-tax net present value of discounted cash flows from reserves using a 10% discount rate.
(4)  Includes physical commodity and financial risk management contracts inclusive of cash flow hedges, together (“Risk Management Contracts”). 
(5)  Realized sulphur price is net of customary deductions such as transportation, marketing and storage fees.
(6)  Revenue is inclusive of petroleum and natural gas revenue, royalties, processing, marketing and other revenue, and realized gains and losses on risk management contracts. 
(7)  Refer to the “Net Operating Income”, “Capital Resources”, “Funds Flow from Operations” and “Working Capital and Capital Strategy” sections of the Company’s MD&A for reference to non-GAAP and other financial measures.
(8)  Excludes reclamation and abandonment activities.
  2025 RESERVES

Deloitte LLP., Cavvy’s independent reserves evaluator, performed National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure of Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) compliant reserves evaluations on the Company's assets at December 31, 2025 and 2024. The following table summarizes those evaluations based on the Deloitte NI 51-101 reserve report using the January 1, 2026 and January 1, 2025 IC4 price forecasts, respectively:

 Year ended December 31Year ended December 31Reserve Volume and Net Present ValueMMboe$000, NPV10(1) 20252024% Change20252024% ChangeReserves Category(2)      Net proved developed producing (PDP) reserves106.6114.9(7)711,084621,39314Net proved (1P) reserves196.2183.27 1,173,560961,49222Net proved plus probable (2P) reserves260.5244.47 1,505,9071,252,17020(1) Estimated pre-tax net present value of discounted cash flows from reserves using a 10% discount rate at evaluator consensus (IC4) year end price forecast.(2) Net reserves reflect working interest share of the asset prior to the deduction of royalties.  Selected 2025 Reserve Highlights

2P Reserve Life Index (“RLI”) increased to 25.8 years from 25.1 years in 2024.2026 forecasted PDP base decline of 5.9%, one of the lowest natural decline rates among peer companies.Lower operating costs allocated to the Company’s producing wells due to offsetting third-party processing revenue and stronger sulphur prices drove the increase in year-end 2025 NPV10.Recategorized certain PDP volumes into PDNP due to the extended well shut-ins in Central AB. Refer to the Company’s Annual Information Form (“AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2025 for more detailed information on Cavvy’s 2025 reserves.

2025 Reserve Reconciliation

 Light & Medium OilConventional GasNatural Gas Liquids ProvedProbableProved + ProbableProvedProbableProved + ProbableProvedProbableProved + Probable MbblMbblMbblMMcfMMcfMMcfMbblMbblMbblOpening Balance---913,127315,0111,228,13831,0468,60739,653Production(2.6)-(2.6)(42,158)-(42,158)(1,708)-(1,708)Technical Revisions2.6-2.6110,43516,122126,5574,9299905,919Extensions---2493027992597Economic Factors---(9,053)(4,273)(13,326)(291)271(20)Closing Balance---972,600326,8901,299,49034,0689,87343,941
Selected Q4 2025 Financial and Operating Highlights

 2025
2024
($ 000s unless otherwise noted)Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Production        Natural gas (mcf/d)111,834 115,467 126,198 105,338 111,787 115,196 157,077 175,356 Condensate (bbl/d)2,065 2,258 2,507 2,454 2,149 2,191 2,472 2,781 NGLs (bbl/d)2,299 2,454 2,524 2,574 1,788 1,726 2,210 2,613 Total production (boe/d)(1)23,003 23,956 26,064 22,584 22,568 23,116 30,861 34,620 Sulphur (mt/d)989 1,120 1,128 1,076 968 1,444 1,376 1,491 Third-party volumes processed (mcf/d)(2)136,579 138,544 121,319 90,926 74,650 72,654 55,688 58,730 Financial        Natural gas price ($/mcf)        Realized before Risk Management Contracts(3)2.41 0.66 1.73 2.24 1.55 0.77 1.14 2.53 Realized after Risk Management Contracts(3)3.60 3.25 3.23 3.58 3.36 3.43 2.71 3.21 Benchmark natural gas price (AECO)2.25 0.62 1.72 2.14 1.46 0.68 1.17 2.48 Condensate price ($/bbl)        Realized before Risk Management Contracts(3)76.62 82.65 84.60 95.15 94.87 92.13 99.96 91.18 Realized after Risk Management Contracts(3)79.75 83.66 85.88 88.29 90.61 84.61 87.75 84.49 Benchmark condensate price (C5 at Edmonton)79.61 86.58 87.71 100.24 98.85 97.10 105.62 98.43 Sulphur price ($/mt)        Realized sulphur price(4)43.22 34.59 32.40 17.00 12.09 8.86 18.43 14.49 Benchmark sulphur price USD (Vancouver FOB)414.47 268.42 271.75 184.42 135.78 97.49 73.82 68.57 Net income (loss)122 (10,086)4,147 2,666 (20,921)7,496 (19,196)(6,284)Net income (loss) $ per share, basic0.00 (0.03)0.01 0.01 (0.08)0.04 (0.12)(0.04)Net income (loss) $ per share, diluted0.00 (0.03)0.01 0.01 (0.08)0.04 (0.12)(0.04)Net operating income(5)20,785 30,631 26,491 32,550 13,720 19,818 7,652 23,418 Cashflow provided by (used in) operating activities7,776 4,466 1,599 22,612 (592)2,260 (1,555)7,049 Funds flow from operations(5)13,518 12,898 14,502 21,707 3,341 8,234 (4,874)12,044 Operating netback ($/boe)(5)9.82 13.90 11.17 16.02 6.61 9.31 2.74 7.44 Total assets540,136 536,274 553,216 571,470 612,423 615,040 585,940 590,531 Adjusted working capital (deficit)(5)
(19,769)(10,631)(20,144)(30,540)(29,777)(42,658)(37,986)(31,671)Net debt(5)(170,617)(163,697)(166,878)(185,438)(197,564)(206,779)(219,204)(209,964)Capital expenditures(6)10,404 4,022 2,391 6,542 5,800 10,002 5,003 4,897 (1) Total production excludes sulphur.
(2) Third-party volumes processed are raw inlet natural gas volumes reported by activity month.
(3) Includes physical commodity and financial risk management contracts inclusive of cash flow hedges, (together “Risk Management Contracts”). The realized natural gas price after Risk Management Contracts shown above is normalized to exclude the impact of the hedge monetization.
(4) Realized sulphur price is net of deductions such as transportation, marketing and storage fees.
(5) Refer to the “Net Operating Income”, “Capital Resources”, “Funds Flow from Operations” and “Working Capital and Capital Strategy” sections of the Company’s MD&A for reference to non-GAAP and other financial measures.
(6) Excludes reclamation and abandonment activities.
 
The Company has filed its AIF for the year ended December 31, 2025, including the 2025 independent oil and natural gas reserves evaluation as required under NI 51-101. Cavvy’s 2025 NI 51-101 Proved Developed Producing (“PDP”) NPV10 value is $711.1 million and Total Proved plus Probable (“2P”) NPV10 value is $1,505.9 million3.

The Company’s AIF, management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) and audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2025 are available at www.cavvyenergy.com and on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

OUTLOOK

The Company’s 2026 guidance is as follows:

 2026 Guidance($ 000s unless otherwise noted)LowHighProduction (boe/d)(1)22,00024,500Sulphur production (mt/d)1,0001,150Net operating income(2)(3)(4)125,000140,000Capital expenditures(5)35,00040,000Total debt (at YE 2026)(6)110,000125,000(1) Production guidance assumes persistence of previously announced shut-ins in Central AB and Northern AB, while production in Northeast BC is assumed to be on production through periods with supporting AECO pricing in 2026(2) Refer to the “Net Operating Income” section of the Company’s MD&A for reference to non-GAAP measures(3) Assumes unhedged average 2026 AECO price of $3.15/GJ, average unhedged 2026 WTI price of US$60.90/bbl and average unhedged 2026 Vancouver FOB Sulphur price of US$237.50/mt(4) Includes the impact of hedge contracts and the 2026 structured Sulphur Pricing Agreement(5) Excludes asset retirement and decommissioning expenditures(6) Assumes USD/CAD exchange rate of 0.7210 
Momentum maintained from key milestones achieved in 2025 including operating cost reduction, third-party processing volume and revenue growth, and sustained risk management initiatives is expected to contribute to strong cash flow and material debt reduction in 2026. These support management’s increasing focus on identifying accretive growth opportunities in 2026, consistent with the Company’s long-term objective to replenish and grow its reserves and production base and enhance its inventory of investment opportunities.

Specific priorities for 2026 are:

Sustain a safe and regulatory compliant business.Capture additional opportunities to grow third-party gathering and processing business value.Minimize facility outages to maximize sales and processing revenue.Reduce long-term debt to improve financial flexibility and position the Company to refinance its 2027 debt maturities.Identify and high-grade both organic and acquisition opportunities to replenish Cavvy’s resource base and increase development upside.
Production
Production guidance of 22,000 to 24,500 boe/d and 1,000 to 1,150 mt/d of sulphur assumes the continued shut-in of uneconomic dry gas production in CAB and Northern AB for the year, accounting for approximately 8,900 boe/d and 300 mt/d of sulphur, along with seasonal production of Northeast BC volumes as natural gas prices allow.

Production guidance also includes a planned six-week major maintenance turnaround at the Caroline Facility scheduled for the third quarter of 2026, and two weeks of unavoidable downtime at the Waterton Facility related to a scheduled maintenance outage on the TC Energy Nova Gas Transmission Ltd. system anticipated for the second quarter of 2026.

Capital Program
Cavvy’s $35 to $40 million capital guidance includes $15 million to $20 million allocated to the scheduled maintenance turnaround at the Caroline Facility in the third quarter of 2026, $9.5 million to capital maintenance including overhauls and long lead procurement for future turnarounds, $3.5 million to facility optimization projects, $5.0 million to ongoing investment in IT and plant control system upgrades, and the remainder for other capital maintenance and corporate expenditures. Capital guidance excludes $8 million of planned expenditure on asset retirement and reclamation activities.

Net Operating Income
Cavvy expects continued growth in third-party processing volumes and revenue at the Caroline and Jumping Pound Facilities. In Q4 2025, the Company entered into a multi-year take-or-pay agreement with an anchor processing customer at the Caroline Facility and has successfully contracted additional third-party volumes at the Jumping Pound Facility resulting from the permanent shutdown of a nearby third-party gas processing facility, which began processing its re-directed raw gas production at the Jumping Pound Facility in January 2026. Additionally, Cavvy continues to re-melt and process third-party sulphur at the Shantz sulphur facility, which further contributes to stable, fee-based revenue streams. This growth of the third-party processing business, hedged 2026 hydrocarbon and sulphur revenue, and continued reliable operation of major gas processing facilities underpins management’s 2026 NOI guidance of $125 to $140 million.

2026 NOI guidance assumes an unhedged Vancouver FOB sulphur price averaging US$250/mt for the first half of 2026 and US$225/mt for the second half of 2026, an average unhedged 2026 AECO price of $3.15/GJ, and an average unhedged 2026 WTI price of US$60.90/bbl.

Recent months have experienced price variances on certain commodities when compared to 2026 guidance assumptions, partially driven by increased demand in other sectors and global trade flow disruptions from the war in the Middle East. Spot sulphur has remained elevated at ~US$498/mt year to date, while AECO natural gas has been unexpectedly weak for the winter season at ~$1.92/GJ year to date. Management is encouraged by the continued strength in the spot sulphur market and expects net sulphur margins to contribute a larger proportion of revenue to 2026 NOI targets than previous years. Recent volatility and uncertainty in the global markets as a result of geo-political instability may continue, and Cavvy will monitor these events to effectively manage risks and opportunities that may arise.

HEDGE POSITION

Cavvy may hedge to mitigate commodity price, interest rate and foreign exchange volatility to protect the cash flow required to fund the Company’s operations, capital requirements and debt service obligations, while maintaining exposure to commodity price upside. Cavvy continues to execute its risk management program governed by its hedge policy and in compliance with the thresholds required by senior lenders.

The Company has 71,140 GJ/d of its remaining 2026 natural gas production hedged at a weighted average fixed price of $3.36/GJ, and 1,528 bbl/d of its remaining 2026 condensate production hedged with a weighted average floor price of $84.81/bbl and a weighted average ceiling price of $91.26/bbl. The Company’s aggregate hedge position for the remainder of 2026 totals 12,765 boe/d, or approximately 55% of the production guidance range. As a result of the Sulphur Pricing Agreement, 1/3 of the Company’s 2026 sulphur sales will be sold at a fixed price of US$225/mt, 1/3 collared with a floor price of US$205/mt and ceiling price of US$250/mt, and the remaining 1/3 sold at Vancouver FOB spot price.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company is hedged in accordance with the requirements of its senior loan agreements. The discounted unrealized gain on the Company’s hedge portfolio was approximately $23 million using the forward strip on March 17, 2026.

The tables below summarize the hedge portfolio as of March 18, 2026:

2026-2027 Hedge Portfolio(1)Q126Q226Q326Q4262026Q127Q227Q327Q4272027AECO Natural Gas Sales          Total Hedged (GJ/d)79,53371,85468,34065,02571,14063,34028,154--22,637Avg Hedge Price (C$/GJ)$3.32$3.34$3.40$3.41$3.36$3.41$3.40--$3.41WTI / C5+Sales          Total Hedged (bbl/d)1,6221,5291,3641,6001,5281,8211,5511,5251,5251,605Avg Collar Cap Price (C$/bbl)$91.69$90.94$91.67$90.80$91.26$90.64$89.43$90.37$90.37$90.22Avg Collar Floor Price (C$/bbl)$84.09$83.83$85.64$85.77$84.81$86.12$85.93$90.37$90.37$88.09Sulphur Sales          1/3 Sales Avg Fixed Price (US$/mt)$225$225$225$225$225-----1/3 Sales Avg Collar Cap Price (US$/mt)$250$250$250$250$250-----Avg Collar Floor Price (US$/mt)$205$205$205$205$205-----Power Purchases          Total Hedged (MW)55555555554141414141Avg Hedge Price (C$/MWh)$71.80$71.80$71.80$71.80$71.80$64.82$64.82$64.82$64.82$64.82  2028 Hedge Portfolio(1)Q128Q228Q328Q4282028Q129Q229Q329Q4292029AECO Natural Gas Sales          Total Hedged (GJ/d)----------Avg Hedge Price (C$/GJ)----------WTI / C5+Sales          Total Hedged (bbl/d)1,3851,350600600982600600600600600Avg Collar Cap Price (C$/bbl)$88.57$86.35$86.17$86.17$87.08$84.67$84.67$84.67$84.67$84.67Avg Collar Floor Price (C$/bbl)$88.57$86.35$86.17$86.17$87.08$84.67$84.67$84.67$84.67$84.67Sulphur Sales          1/3 Sales Avg Hedge Price (US$/mt)----------1/3 Sales Avg Collar Cap Price (US$/mt)----------Avg Collar Floor Price (US$/mt)----------Power Purchases          Total Hedged (MW)1010101010-----Avg Hedge Price (C$/MWh)$61.00$61.00$61.00$61.00$61.00-----(1) Includes forward physical sales contracts and financial derivative contracts as of March 18, 2026
        CONFERENCE CALL DETAILS

A conference call and webcast to discuss the results will be held on Thursday, March 19, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. MDT / 10:30 a.m. EDT. To participate in the webcast or conference call, you are asked to register using one of the links provided below.

To register to participate via webcast please follow this link:

https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/dyppy63o

Alternatively, to register to participate by telephone please follow this link:

https://register-conf.media-server.com/register/BI1d1b24cabc2148cd96c698b0e637fa76

A replay of the webcast will be available two hours after the conclusion of the event and may be accessed using the webcast link above.

ABOUT CAVVY ENERGY        

Cavvy Energy is an integrated Canadian upstream and midstream energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta. Cavvy’s objective is to create long term shareholder value through development, production, processing, and marketing of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and sulphur while providing superior service to the Company’s third-party customers through our strategic, company-owned gathering and processing infrastructure located in western Canada.

Forward-Looking Statements
Certain of the statements contained herein including, without limitation, management plans and assessments of future plans and operations, Cavvy’s outlook, strategy and vision, intentions with respect to future acquisitions, dispositions and other opportunities, including exploration and development activities, Cavvy’s ability to market its assets, plans and timing for development of undeveloped and probable resources, Cavvy’s goals with respect to the environment, relations with Indigenous people and promoting equity, diversity and inclusion, estimated abandonment and reclamation costs, plans regarding hedging, plans regarding the payment of dividends, wells to be drilled, the weighting of commodity expenses, expected production and performance of oil and natural gas properties, results and timing of projects, access to adequate pipeline capacity and third-party infrastructure, growth expectations, supply and demand for oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas, industry conditions, government regulations and regimes, capital expenditures and the nature of capital expenditures and the timing and method of financing thereof, may constitute “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws (collectively “forward-looking statements”). Words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “continue”, “focus”, “endeavor”, “commit”, “shall”, “propose”, “might”, “project”, “predict”, “vision”, “opportunity”, “strategy”, “objective”, “potential”, “forecast”, “estimate”, “goal”, “target”, “growth”, “future”, and similar expressions may be used to identify these forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management's current beliefs and are based on information currently available to management.
Forward-looking statements involve significant risk and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements including, but not limited to, the risks associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production, processing, marketing and transportation, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, imprecision of resources estimates, environmental risks, competition from other producers, incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions, failure to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, delays resulting from or inability to obtain required regulatory approvals, ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and the risk factors outlined under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere herein. The recovery and resources estimate of Cavvy's reserves provided herein are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated resources will be recovered. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on a number of factors and assumptions which have been used to develop such forward-looking statements, but which may prove to be incorrect. Although Cavvy believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements because Cavvy can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. In addition to other factors and assumptions which may be identified in this document, assumptions have been made regarding, among other things: the impact of increasing competition; the general stability of the economic and political environment in which Cavvy operates; the timely receipt of any required regulatory approvals; the ability of Cavvy to obtain and retain qualified staff, equipment and services in a timely and cost efficient manner; the ability of the operator of the projects which Cavvy has an interest in to operate the field in a safe, efficient and effective manner; the ability of Cavvy to obtain financing on acceptable terms; the ability to replace and expand oil and natural gas resources through acquisition, development and exploration; the timing and costs of pipeline, storage and facility construction and expansion and the ability of Cavvy to secure adequate product transportation; future oil and natural gas prices; currency, exchange and interest rates; the regulatory framework regarding royalties, taxes and environmental matters in the jurisdictions in which Cavvy operates; timing and amount of capital expenditures; future sources of funding; production levels; weather conditions; success of exploration and development activities; access to gathering, processing and pipeline systems; advancing technologies; and the ability of Cavvy to successfully market its oil and natural gas products.
Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional information on these and other factors that could affect Cavvy's operations and financial results are included in reports on file with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR+ website (www.sedarplus.ca), and at Cavvy's website (www.Cavvyenergy.com).
Although the forward-looking statements contained herein are based upon what management believes to be reasonable assumptions, management cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and Cavvy assumes no obligation to update or review them to reflect new events or circumstances except as required by applicable securities laws.
Forward-looking statements contained herein concerning the oil and gas industry and Cavvy's general expectations concerning this industry are based on estimates prepared by management using data from publicly available industry sources as well as from reserve reports, market research and industry analysis and on assumptions based on data and knowledge of this industry which Cavvy believes to be reasonable. However, this data is inherently imprecise, although generally indicative of relative market positions, market shares and performance characteristics. While Cavvy is not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented herein, the industry involves risks and uncertainties and is subject to change based on various factors.

Additional Reader Advisories
Barrels of oil equivalent (“boe”) may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of 6 Mcf: 1 boe is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.

Abbreviations

Natural GasLiquidsMcfThousand cubic feetbbl/dBarrels per dayMcf/dThousand cubic feet per dayboe/dBarrels of oil equivalent per dayMMcf/dMillion cubic feet per dayWTIWest Texas IntermediateAECOAlberta benchmark price for natural gasMbblThousand barrelsGJGigajouleMMbblMillion barrelsPower MMboeMillion barrels of oil equivalentMWMegawattC2EthaneMWhMegawatt hourC3PropaneSulphur C4ButanemtMetric tonneC5/C5+Condensate / Pentanemt/dMetric tonne per day  FOBFree on board       Neither the TSX nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release

1 Refer to the “non-GAAP measures” in the Company’s MD&A.
2 Refer to the “non-GAAP measures” in the Company’s MD&A.
3 NPV10 at effective date of Dec. 31, 2025 using Jan. 1, 2026 evaluator consensus (“IC4”) price forecast.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 18:00 1mo ago
Petrus Resources Announces Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2025 Financial, Operating & Reserves Results stocknewsapi
PTRUF
CALGARY, Alberta, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Petrus Resources Ltd. (“Petrus” or the “Company”) (TSX: PRQ) is pleased to report financial and operating results as at and for the three months and year ended December 31, 2025, and to provide 2025 year-end reserves information as evaluated by Insite Petroleum Consultants Ltd. ("Insite"). The Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") and audited consolidated financial statements are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

Q4 2025 HIGHLIGHTS:

Funds flow(2) up 8% – Generated funds flow of $13.5 million(2) in the fourth quarter of 2025, an 8% increase from $12.5 million reported in the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase is due to higher production volumes, increased realized gains from risk management activities, and lower royalty expense, partially offset by lower realized oil and NGL prices.Production up 6% – Production for the fourth quarter of 2025 averaged 9,568 boe/d(1), up 6% from 9,066 boe/d in the fourth quarter of 2024. Oil and condensate(1) production was up 20% along with a 7% increase in NGL production from the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in total liquids production reflects a focus on liquids weighted drilling opportunities and strategic efforts to increase NGL recoveries.Operating expense down 10% – Operating expense averaged $5.33/boe in the fourth quarter of 2025, down 10% from $5.89/boe in the fourth quarter of 2024. The lower operating expense per boe is due to fixed costs being allocated over a larger production base.Net debt(2) down 4% – Net debt was $62.5 million at December 31, 2025, down $2.4 million from September 30, 2025.Commodity prices – Total realized price was $25.74/boe in the fourth quarter of 2025, a decrease of 3% from $26.45/boe in the fourth quarter of 2024. Realized natural gas prices increased by 52% to $2.45/mcf from $1.61/mcf in the fourth quarter of 2024, offset by a 23% decrease in the realized oil price to $72.49/bbl from $93.60/bbl in the fourth quarter of 2024.Capital activity – Capital spending in the fourth quarter of 2025 was $10.2 million, 63% of which was spent on drilling, completing, and tying in new wells in Ferrier, with the balance spent on land acquisitions and facility upgrades.Dividends – Paid a regular monthly dividend of $0.01 per share, totaling $4.0 million, during the fourth quarter of 2025. Shareholders chose to reinvest $2.9 million under the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan, resulting in the issuance of 1.6 million common shares. 2025 ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS:

Funds flow(2) – Petrus generated funds flow of $51.2 million in 2025, up 2% from $50.1 million in 2024. Our annual funds flow was in line with the 2025 budget guidance of $45 million to $55 million.Production – Production for 2025 averaged 9,371 boe/d(1), as compared to 9,382 boe/d in 2024. Our annual average daily production volumes were consistent with the 2025 budget guidance range of 9,000 to 10,000 boe/d.Natural Gas Liquids (NGL) production(1) – NGL production was higher by 16% in 2025, increasing to 1,890 bbl/d compared to 1,623 bbl/d in 2024. This is the result of operational efforts that increased higher value NGL yields by 21%.Commodity prices – Total realized price was $25.58/boe in 2025, a decrease of 6% from $27.24/boe in 2024. Realized natural gas prices increased by 20% to $1.92/mcf in 2025 from $1.60/mcf in 2024, offset by a 13% decrease in realized oil price to $81.89/bbl in 2025 from $94.35/bbl in 2024.Capital expenditures – Total capital expenditures were $49.0 million in 2025, up from $31.8 million in 2024. Drilling, completing, and tying in new wells in Ferrier accounted for 73% of capital, with the balance spent on land acquisitions and facility upgrades.Dividends – Paid a regular monthly dividend of $0.01 per share, totaling $15.5 million, during 2025. Shareholders chose to reinvest $10.9 million under the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan, resulting in the issuance of 7.6 million common shares. 2026 OUTLOOK(3)

Petrus commenced its 2026 capital program in late December 2025 with drilling to continue into March. We are on schedule to start bringing on new production in mid-March.

In February, Petrus completed the acquisition of an oil-weighted Cardium property in the Harmattan area of Central Alberta. This transaction adds long-life assets and approximately 2,000 boe/d(4) of production. The acquisition was financed through a combination of equity and debt.

The previously announced 2026 capital budget includes planned capital investment of $50 million to $60 million, with expected year end net debt(2) of $75 million to $80 million.

The Company expects 2026 average daily production of 11,000 to 12,000 boe/d(1)(5) and annual funds flow(2) of $60 million to $65 million.

For 2026, Petrus has hedged approximately 50% of its forecasted production at an average price of $3.02/mcf for natural gas and CAD$86.76/bbl for oil. This disciplined risk management strategy positions the Company to achieve its guidance targets and maintain financial stability. As always, Petrus is prepared to adapt its capital program in response to market dynamics, remaining focused on delivering sustainable returns to shareholders.

FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR-END 2025 CONFERENCE CALL       

Date and Time: March 19, 2026 9:00 a.m. (Mountain Time)
Please refer to the events page on Petrus' website for conference call details and links: www.petrusresources.com/events

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

The Company's Annual General Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 21, 2026.
For details on the location and timing, please visit the events page on Petrus' website: www.petrusresources.com/events

For further information, please contact:
Ken Gray, P.Eng.
President and Chief Executive Officer
T: (403) 930-0889
E: [email protected]

(1)Disclosure of production on a per boe basis consists of the constituent product types and their respective quantities. Refer to "BOE Presentation" and "Production and Product Type Information" for further details.
(2)Non-GAAP financial measure or non-GAAP ratio. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures".
(3) Refer to "Advisories - Forward-Looking Statements".
(4) Production for the month of January 2026 consisted of approximately 640 bbl/d of crude oil, 4,580 mcf/d of natural gas and 600 bbl/d of NGLs.
(5) At mid-point of 11,500 boe/d, forecast to consist of approximately 2,200 bbl/d of crude oil, 41,400 mcf/d of natural gas and 2,400 bbl/d of NGLs.

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

OPERATIONS Year ended Dec. 31, 2025

Year ended 
 
Dec. 31, 2024Three months ended 
 
Dec. 31, 2025Three months ended 
 
Sept. 30, 2025Three months ended Jun. 30, 2025

Three months ended 
 
Mar. 31, 2025Average Production      Natural gas (mcf/d)36,712 38,149 36,981 38,406 35,738 35,689 Oil and condensate(1) (bbl/d)1,362 1,400 1,475 1,523 1,243 1,202 NGLs (bbl/d)1,890 1,623 1,929 1,892 1,955 1,777 Total (boe/d)(1)9,371 9,382 9,568 9,817 9,155 8,929 Total (boe)(1)3,419,981 3,433,994 880,280 903,165 833,038 803,498 Liquids weighting35%32%36%35%35%33%Realized Prices      Natural gas ($/mcf)1.92 1.60 2.45 0.92 2.11 2.25 Oil and condensate(1) ($/bbl)81.89 94.35 72.49 81.46 83.31 92.73 NGLs ($/bbl)30.61 38.44 25.19 29.49 29.07 39.54 Total realized price ($/boe)25.58 27.24 25.74 21.90 25.77 29.35 Royalty income0.04 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 Royalty expense(2.42)(3.66)(2.30)(1.70)(2.41)(3.36)Net oil and natural gas revenue ($/boe)23.20 23.63 23.47 20.24 23.41 26.05 Operating expense(5.99)(5.93)(5.33)(5.86)(6.10)(6.76)Transportation expense(1.63)(1.55)(1.72)(1.45)(1.73)(1.65)Operating netback(2) ($/boe)15.58 16.15 16.42 12.93 15.58 17.64 Realized gain on financial derivatives2.92 2.02 3.73 4.26 2.31 1.14 Other cash income (expense)0.06 0.34 0.10 0.18 (0.07)0.02 General & administrative expense(1.48)(1.54)(2.49)(1.05)(0.96)(1.41)Cash finance expense(1.79)(1.87)(1.91)(1.80)(1.77)(1.68)Decommissioning expenditures(0.30)(0.52)(0.52)(0.22)(0.27)(0.19)Funds flow & corporate netback(2) ($/boe)14.99 14.58 15.33 14.30 14.82 15.52        FINANCIAL (000s except $ per share)Year ended Dec. 31, 2025

Year ended Dec. 31, 2024

Three months ended Dec. 31, 2025

Three months ended Sept. 30, 2025

Three months ended Jun. 30, 2025

Three months ended Mar. 31, 2025

Oil and natural gas sales87,636 93,721 22,684 19,816 21,506 23,630 Net income (loss)10,566 (1,246)5,951 (2,677)10,380 (3,088)Net income (loss) per share      Basic0.08 (0.01)0.04 (0.02)0.08 (0.02)Fully diluted0.08 (0.01)0.04 (0.02)0.08 (0.02)Funds flow(2)51,229 50,058 13,498 12,916 12,348 12,467 Funds flow per share(2)      Basic0.40 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Fully diluted0.39 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.10 Capital expenditures48,993 31,814 10,244 8,268 13,202 17,279 Acquisitions (dispositions)— — — — — — Weighted average shares outstanding      Basic129,246 124,389 132,265 130,342 128,252 126,043 Fully diluted132,900 124,389 137,119 130,342 130,656 126,043 As at year end      Common shares outstanding      Basic133,442 125,113 133,442 131,582 129,634 127,469 Fully diluted145,762 134,919 145,762 142,774 141,456 138,501 Total assets427,372 420,124 427,372 424,940 433,962 427,955 Non-current liabilities61,556 65,475 61,556 64,586 64,837 68,176 Net debt(2)62,502 60,080 62,502 64,860 67,987 66,009  (1)Disclosure of production on a per boe basis consists of the constituent product types and their respective quantities. Refer to "BOE Presentation" and "Production and Product Type Information" for further details.
(2)Non-GAAP financial measure or non-GAAP ratio. Refer to "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures".

RESERVES

Petrus’ 2025 year-end reserves were evaluated by its independent reserves evaluator, Insite, in accordance with the definitions, standards and procedures contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (“COGE Handbook”) and National Instrument 51-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) as of December 31, 2025 ("2025 Insite Report"). Additional reserve information as required under NI 51-101 will be included in our Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2025, which will be available under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

Petrus has a reserves committee, comprised of a majority of independent board members, that reviews the qualifications and appointment of the independent reserves evaluator. The committee also reviews the procedures for providing information to the evaluators. All booked reserves are based upon annual evaluations by the independent qualified reserve evaluator conducted in accordance with the COGE Handbook and NI 51-101. The evaluations are conducted using all available geological and engineering data. The reserves committee has reviewed the reserves information and approved the 2025 Insite Report.

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s before tax reserves as evaluated by Insite:

As at December 31, 2025Total Company Interest (1)(3)
Reserve CategoryConventional
Natural Gas
(mmcf)
Light and
Medium
Crude Oil
(mbbl)
NGL
(mbbl)
Total
(mboe)
NPV 0%(2)
($000s)
NPV 5%(2)
($000s)
NPV 10%(2)
($000s)
Proved Developed Producing75,646 1,149 5,210 18,966 298,117 232,406 191,512 Proved Developed Non-Producing4,712 50 211 1,046 14,109 10,401 7,969 Proved Undeveloped160,145 4,478 9,733 40,902 532,200 325,912 207,613 Total Proved240,503 5,676 15,154 60,914 844,426 568,719 407,094 Proved + Probable Producing90,315 1,407 6,207 22,666 389,867 280,080 221,127 Total Probable124,897 4,578 7,059 32,453 532,617 307,513 195,983 Total Proved Plus Probable365,400 10,255 22,212 93,367 1,377,044 876,232 603,076  (1)Tables may not add due to rounding.
(2)NPV 0%, NPV 5% and NPV 10% refer to the risked net present value of the future net revenue of the Company's reserves, discounted by 0%, 5% and 10%, respectively
and is presented before tax and based on Insite's pricing assumptions.
(3)Total company interest reserve volumes are presented as the Company's total working interest before the deduction of royalties (but after including any royalty interests of Petrus).

The Company produced 3.4 mmboe during 2025 and ended the year with 19.0 mmboe of Proved Developed Producing ("PDP") reserves (34% oil and liquids).

Petrus ended 2025 with $191.5 million, $407.1 million and $603.1 million of PDP, Total Proved ("TP"), and Proved plus Probable (“P+P”), before-tax reserve value, respectively, discounted at 10%, based on the 2025 Insite Report. In 2025, the Company realized Finding and Development (“F&D”)(1)(2) costs of $9.94/boe for PDP reserves.

Based on the 2025 Insite Report, the Company’s PDP reserve value before-tax, discounted at 10% is $0.92 per share (145,761,860 fully diluted common shares outstanding at December 31, 2025). On the same basis, the Company's P+P before-tax reserve value, discounted at 10% is $3.75 per share.  

(1) Refer to "Oil and Gas Disclosures"
(2) While F&D costs are commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry and have been prepared by management, these terms do not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies and, therefore, should not be used to make such comparisons.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT COST
Future Development Cost ("FDC") reflects Insite's best estimate of what it will cost to bring the P+P undeveloped reserves on production. The following table provides a summary of the Company's FDC as set forth in the 2025 Insite Report:

Future Development Cost ($000s)Total Proved Total Proved + Probable 202644,504 47,854 202770,884 70,884 2028112,203 112,203 2029110,703 216,609 Thereafter91,671 219,632 Total FDC, Undiscounted429,965 667,182 Total FDC, Discounted at 10%334,460 497,095 
PERFORMANCE RATIOS

The following table highlights annual performance ratios for the Company from 2021 to 2025(2):

 December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
December 31, 2023
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2021
Proved Producing          FD&A ($/boe) (1)9.94 12.58 19.67 12.58 15.64 F&D ($/boe) (1)9.94 12.58 19.67 12.70 8.90 Reserve Life Index (yr) (1)5.4 5.24 5.27 5.31 5.41 Reserve Replacement Ratio (1)1.4 0.74 1.15 3.20 0.78 FD&A Recycle Ratio (1)1.6 1.28 1.06 2.91 1.58 Proved Developed          FD&A ($/boe) (1)8.69 12.63 19.34 12.50 14.54 F&D ($/boe) (1)8.69 12.63 19.34 12.61 8.53 Reserve Life Index (yr) (1)5.7 5.33 5.36 5.39 5.50 Reserve Replacement Ratio (1)1.6 0.73 1.17 3.22 0.84 FD&A Recycle Ratio (1)1.6 1.28 1.08 2.93 1.70 Total Proved          FD&A ($/boe) (1)4.06 17.53 14.50 18.24 10.51 F&D ($/boe) (1)4.06 17.53 14.50 33.99 9.24 Reserve Life Index (yr) (1)17.3 14.4 13.85 12.18 15.30 Reserve Replacement Ratio (1)4.7 0.97 2.98 3.79 4.50 FD&A Recycle Ratio (1)3.8 0.92 1.44 2.01 2.35 Future Development Cost (undiscounted) ($000s)429,965 417,381 391,058 313,786 233,684 Total Proved + Probable          FD&A ($/boe) (1)3.84 33.63 14.00 15.66 10.57 F&D ($/boe) (1)3.84 33.63 14.00 36.12 8.36 Reserve Life Index (yr) (1)26.5 21.9 21.62 19.68 23.29 Reserve Replacement Ratio (1)6.9 0.33 3.49 6.63 5.10 FD&A Recycle Ratio (1)4.1 0.48 1.50 2.34 2.33 Future Development Cost (undiscounted) ($000s)667,182 625,179 618,437 519,823 343,489  (1)Refer to "Oil and Gas Disclosures"
(2) While FD&A costs and F&D costs, reserve life index, reserve replacement ratio and FD&A recycle ratio are commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry and have been prepared by management, these terms do not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies and, therefore, should not be used to make such comparisons.

NET ASSET VALUE
The following table shows the Company's Net Asset Value ("NAV"), calculated using the 2025 Insite Report and Insite's December 31, 2025 price forecast. The reader is cautioned that these amounts may not be directly comparable to other companies, as the term "Net Asset Value" does not have a standardized meaning under GAAP or NI 51-101. Management believes that net asset value provides a useful measure to analyze the comparative change in the Company's estimated value on a normalized basis.

As at December 31, 2025 ($000s except per share)

Proved Developed
ProducingTotal ProvedProved + ProbablePresent Value Reserves, before tax (discounted at 10%) (1)191,512 407,094 603,076 Undeveloped Land Value (2)5,377 5,377 5,377 Net Debt (3)(62,502)(62,502)(62,502)Net Asset Value134,387 349,969 545,951 Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding145,762 145,762 145,762 Estimated Net Asset Value per Fully Diluted Share$0.92 $2.40 $3.75  (1)Based on the 2025 Insite Report, using the forecast future prices and costs.
(2)Based on the exploration and evaluation assets as per the Company's December 31, 2025 audited consolidated financial statements.
(3) Non-GAAP financial measure. See "Non-GAAP and Other Financial Measures" .

NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

This press release makes reference to the terms "operating netback" (on an absolute and $/boe basis), "corporate netback" (on an absolute and $/boe basis), "funds flow" (on an absolute, per share (basic and fully diluted) and $/boe basis), and "net debt". These non-GAAP and other financial measures are not recognized measures under GAAP (IFRS) and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP (IFRS). Accordingly, the Company's use of these terms may not be comparable to similarly defined measures presented by other companies. These non-GAAP and other financial measures should not be considered to be more meaningful than GAAP measures, which are determined in accordance with IFRS as indicators of our performance. Management uses these non-GAAP and other financial measures for the reasons set forth below.

Operating Netback

Operating netback is a common non-GAAP financial measure used in the oil and natural gas industry which is a useful supplemental measure to evaluate the specific operating performance by product type at the oil and natural gas lease level. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to operating netback is oil and natural gas sales. Operating netback is calculated as oil and natural gas sales less royalty expenses, operating expenses, and transportation expenses. See below for a reconciliation of operating netback to oil and natural gas sales.

Operating netback ($/boe) is a non-GAAP ratio used in the oil and natural gas industry which is a useful supplemental measure to evaluate the specific operating performance by product type at the oil and natural gas lease level. It is calculated as operating netbacks divided by weighted average daily production on a per boe basis. See below.

Corporate Netback and Funds Flow

Corporate netback or funds flow is a common non-GAAP financial measure used in the oil and natural gas industry which evaluates the Company’s profitability at the corporate level. Corporate netback and funds flow are used interchangeably. Petrus analyzes these measures on an absolute basis and on a per unit (boe) and per share (basic and fully diluted) basis as non-GAAP ratios. Management believes that funds flow and corporate netback provide information to assist a reader in understanding the Company's profitability relative to current commodity prices. They are calculated as the operating netback less general and administrative expense, cash finance expense and decommissioning expenditures, plus or minus other income (expense), and the realized gain (loss) on financial derivatives. See below for a reconciliation of funds flow and corporate netback to oil and natural gas sales.

Corporate netback ($/boe) or funds flow ($/boe) is a non-GAAP ratio used in the oil and natural gas industry which evaluates the Company’s profitability at the corporate level. Management believes that funds flow ($/boe) or corporate netback ($/boe) provide information to assist a reader in understanding the Company's profitability relative to current commodity prices. It is calculated as corporate netbacks or funds flow divided by weighted average daily production on a per boe basis. See below.

Funds flow per share (basic and fully diluted) is comprised of funds flow divided by basic or fully diluted weighted average common shares outstanding.

 Three months ended December 31, 2025

Three months ended December 31, 2024

Year ended December
31, 2025Year ended December
31, 2024 $000s$/boe$000s$/boe$000s$/boe$000s$/boeOil and natural gas sales22,684 25.77 20,446 24.12 87,636 25.62 71,635 27.55 Royalty expense(2,029)(2.30)(2,593)(3.06)(8,275)(2.42)(9,359)(3.60)Net oil and natural gas revenue20,655 23.47 17,853 21.06 79,361 23.20 62,276 23.95 Transportation expense(1,514)(1.72)(1,239)(1.46)(5,588)(1.63)(4,113)(1.58)Operating expense(4,693)(5.33)(5,172)(6.10)(20,492)(5.99)(15,461)(5.95)Operating netback14,448 16.42 11,442 13.50 53,281 15.58 42,702 16.42 Realized gain on financial derivatives3,287 3.73 2,115 2.49 9,971 2.92 4,391 1.69 Cash other income90 0.10 77 0.09 214 0.06 166 0.06 General & administrative expense(2,193)(2.49)(1,209)(1.43)(5,075)(1.48)(3,539)(1.36)Cash finance expense(1,677)(1.91)(1,657)(1.95)(6,124)(1.79)(4,888)(1.88)Decommissioning expenditures(457)(0.52)(103)(0.12)(1,038)(0.30)(1,265)(0.49)Funds flow and corporate netback13,498 15.33 10,665 12.58 51,229 14.99 37,567 14.44   Three months ended December 31, 2025

Three months ended September 30, 2025

Three months ended June 30, 2025

Three months ended March 31, 2025

 $000s$/boe$000s$/boe$000s$/boe$000s$/boeOil and natural gas sales22,684 25.77 19,816 21.94 21,506 25.82 23,630 29.41 Royalty expense(2,029)(2.30)(1,533)(1.70)(2,010)(2.41)(2,703)(3.36)Net oil and natural gas revenue20,655 23.47 18,283 20.24 19,496 23.41 20,927 26.05 Transportation expense(1,514)(1.72)(1,312)(1.45)(1,438)(1.73)(1,324)(1.65)Operating expense(4,693)(5.33)(5,292)(5.86)(5,078)(6.10)(5,429)(6.76)Operating netback14,448 16.42 11,679 12.93 12,980 15.58 14,174 17.64 Realized gain on financial derivatives3,287 3.73 3,849 4.26 1,923 2.31 912 1.14 Other cash income (expense)90 0.10 164 0.18 (57)(0.07)17 0.02 General & administrative expense(2,193)(2.49)(952)(1.05)(797)(0.96)(1,133)(1.41)Cash finance expense(1,677)(1.91)(1,623)(1.80)(1,473)(1.77)(1,351)(1.68)Decommissioning expenditures(457)(0.52)(201)(0.22)(228)(0.27)(152)(0.19)Funds flow and corporate netback13,498 15.33 12,916 14.30 12,348 14.82 12,467 15.52 
Net Debt
Net debt is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated as the sum of long-term debt and working capital (current assets and current liabilities), excluding the current financial derivative contracts and current portion of the lease obligation and decommissioning obligation. Petrus uses net debt as a key indicator of its leverage and strength of its balance sheet. Net debt is reconciled, in the table below, to long-term debt which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

($000s)As at Dec. 31, 2025As at Sept. 30, 2025As at Jun. 30, 2025As at Mar. 31, 2025As at Dec. 31, 2024Long-term debt25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Current assets(22,424)(17,423)(23,466)(15,763)(17,583)Current liabilities54,044 53,865 59,308 59,788 51,268 Current net financial derivatives8,360 5,073 7,993 (1,779)2,632 Current portion of lease obligation(223)(160)(155)(164)(164)Current portion of decommissioning obligation(2,255)(1,495)(693)(1,073)(1,073)Net debt62,502 64,860 67,987 66,009 60,080 
ADVISORIES

Oil and Gas Disclosures
Our oil and gas reserves statement for the year ended December 31, 2025, which includes disclosure of our oil and natural gas reserves and other oil and natural gas information in accordance with NI 51-101, is contained in the Company's Annual Information Form (the "AIF"), which will be filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

It should not be assumed that the present worth of estimated future amounts presented in the tables above represents the fair market value of the reserves. There is no assurance that the forecast prices and costs assumptions will be attained, and variances could be material. The recovery and reserve estimates contained herein are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves will be recovered. Actual reserves may be greater than or less than the estimates provided herein.

This press release contains metrics commonly used in the oil and natural gas industry which have been prepared by management. These terms do not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies, and therefore should not be used to make such comparisons.

Management uses oil and gas metrics for its own performance measurements and to provide shareholders with measures to compare Petrus' operations over time. Readers are cautioned that the information provided by these metrics, or that can be derived from the metrics presented in this press release, should not be relied upon for investment or other purposes.

F&D Costs and FD&A Costs
FD&A cost is defined as capital costs for the time period including change in FDC divided by change in reserves including revisions, and production for that same time period. F&D cost is defined as capital costs for the time period including change in FDC divided by change in reserves including revisions and production for that same time period, excluding acquisitions and dispositions. Both F&D costs and FD&A costs take into account reserves revisions during the year on a per boe basis. The methodology used to calculate F&D costs includes disclosure required to bring the proved undeveloped and probable reserves to production. Annually, changes in forecast FDC occur as a result of Petrus' development, acquisition, and disposition activities, undeveloped reserve revision, and capital cost estimates. These values reflect the independent evaluator's best estimate of the cost to bring the proved and probable undeveloped reserves to production.

Reserve Life Index
Reserve life index is defined as total reserves by category divided by the annualized fourth quarter production.

Reserve Replacement Ratio
The reserve replacement ratio is calculated by dividing the yearly change in reserves net of production by the actual annual production for the year.

FD&A Recycle Ratio
The FD&A recycle ratio is calculated by dividing operating netback by FD&A costs.

Basis of Presentation
Financial data presented above has largely been derived from the Company's financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require publicly accountable enterprises to prepare their financial statements using IFRS. Accounting policies adopted by the Company are set out in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended December 31, 2025. The reporting and the measurement currency is the Canadian dollar. All financial information is expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise stated.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information regarding Petrus set forth in this press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law, that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The use of any of the words "anticipate", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "should", "believe", and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements represent Petrus’ internal projections, estimates, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions, intentions or statements about future events or performance. These statements are only predictions and actual events or results may differ materially. Although Petrus believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievement since such expectations are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors could cause Petrus’ actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, Petrus.

In particular, forward-looking statements included in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: Petrus’ 2026 capital program and the expectations that drilling will continue into March; that new production will start in mid-March; Petrus’ 2026 capital budget and the anticipated allocation thereof, including the planned investment of $50 million to $60 million; Petrus’ expectations regarding year end net debt; Petrus’ expectations regarding 2026 average annual production of 11,000 to 12,000 boe/d; that for 2026, Petrus has hedged approximately 46% of its forecast production; that our disciplined risk management strategy positions the Company to achieve its guidance targets and maintain financial stability; that Petrus is prepared to adapt its capital program in response to market dynamics, remaining focused on delivering sustainable returns to shareholders; and the estimated future development costs to bring our undeveloped reserves on production. In addition, statements relating to "reserves" are deemed to be forward-looking statements, as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future.

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, most of which are beyond the Company's control, including: the risk that (i) the tariffs that are currently in effect on goods exported from or imported into Canada continue in effect for an extended period of time, the tariffs that have been threatened are implemented, that tariffs that are currently suspended are reactivated, the rate or scope of tariffs are increased, or new tariffs are imposed, including on oil and natural gas, (ii) the U.S. and/or Canada imposes any other form of tax, restriction or prohibition on the import or export of products from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas, and (iii) the tariffs imposed or threatened to be imposed by the U.S. on other countries and retaliatory tariffs imposed or threatened to be imposed by other countries on the U.S., will trigger a broader global trade war which could have a material adverse effect on the Canadian, U.S. and global economies, and by extension the Canadian oil and natural gas industry and the Company, including by decreasing demand for (and the price of) oil and natural gas, disrupting supply chains, increasing costs, causing volatility in global financial markets, and limiting access to financing; the impact of general economic conditions; volatility in market prices for crude oil, NGL and natural gas; industry conditions; currency fluctuation; changes in interest rates and inflation rates; imprecision of reserve estimates; liabilities inherent in crude oil and natural gas operations; environmental risks; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions and exploration and development programs; competition; the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management; changes in income tax laws or changes in tax laws and incentive programs relating to the oil and gas industry; hazards such as fire, explosion, blowouts, cratering, and spills, each of which could result in substantial damage to wells, production facilities, other property and the environment or in personal injury and/or increase our costs, decrease our production, or otherwise impede our ability to operate our business; extreme weather events, such as wildfires, floods, drought and extreme cold or warm temperatures, each of which could result in substantial damage to our assets and/or increase our costs, decrease our production, or otherwise impede our ability to operate our business; stock market volatility; ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources; that the amount of dividends that we pay may be reduced or suspended entirely; that we reduce or suspend the repurchase of shares under our NCIB; and the other risks and uncertainties described in our most recently filed Annual Information Form. With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this press release, Petrus has made assumptions regarding: the duration and impact of tariffs that are currently in effect on goods exported from or imported into Canada, and that other than the tariffs that are currently in effect, neither the U.S. nor Canada (i) increases the rate or scope of such tariffs, reenacts tariffs that are currently suspended, or imposes new tariffs, on the import of goods from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas, and/or (ii) imposes any other form of tax, restriction or prohibition on the import or export of products from one country to the other, including on oil and natural gas; the amount of dividends that we will pay; the number of shares that we will repurchase under our NCIB; future commodity prices and royalty regimes; availability of skilled labour; timing and amount of capital expenditures; future exchange rates; the impact of increasing competition; conditions in general economic and financial markets; availability of drilling and related equipment and services; effects of regulation by governmental agencies; the effects of inflation on our costs and profitability; future interest rates; and future operating costs. Management has included the above summary of assumptions and risks related to forward-looking information provided in this press release in order to provide investors with a more complete perspective on Petrus’ future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Petrus’ actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits the Company will derive therefrom. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive.

This press release contains future-oriented financial information and financial outlook information (collectively, "FOFI") about Petrus' prospective results of operations including, without limitation, our 2026 capital budget guidance, our forecast for 2026 year-end net debt, our 2026 funds flow guidance, our 2026 average daily production guidance, and the percentage of our forecast production for 2026 that is hedged, which are subject to the same assumptions, risk factors, limitations, and qualifications as set forth above. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on FOFI. Petrus' actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these FOFI, or if any of them do so, what benefits Petrus will derive therefrom. Petrus has included the FOFI in order to provide readers with a more complete perspective on Petrus' future operations and such information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

These forward-looking statements and FOFI are made as of the date of this press release and the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements and FOFI, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, other than as required by applicable securities laws.

BOE Presentation
The oil and natural gas industry commonly expresses production volumes and reserves on a barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") basis whereby natural gas volumes are converted at the ratio of six thousand cubic feet to one barrel of oil. The intention is to sum oil and natural gas measurement units into one basis for improved measurement of results and comparisons with other industry participants. Petrus uses the 6:1 boe measure which is the approximate energy equivalence of the two commodities at the burner tip. Boe's do not represent an economic value equivalence at the wellhead and therefore may be a misleading measure if used in isolation.

Production and Product Type Information
References to crude oil (or oil), natural gas liquids ("NGLs"), natural gas (or gas) and average daily production in this document refer to the light and medium crude oil, conventional natural gas, and NGLs product types, as applicable, as defined in National Instrument 51-101 ("NI 51-101"), except as noted below.

NI 51-101 includes condensate within the NGLs product type. The Company has disclosed condensate as combined with crude oil and separately from other NGLs since the price of condensate as compared to other NGLs is currently significantly higher and the Company believes that this crude oil and condensate presentation provides a more accurate description of its operations and results therefrom. Crude oil therefore refers to light oil, medium oil, and condensate. NGLs refers to ethane, propane, butane and pentane combined. Natural gas refers to conventional natural gas.

Dividend Advisory
The Company's future dividends, if any, and the level thereof is uncertain. Any decision to pay dividends on the common shares (including the actual amount, the declaration date, the record date and the payment date in connection therewith) will be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and may depend on a variety of factors, including, without limitation the Company's business performance, financial condition, financial requirements, growth plans, expected capital requirements and other conditions existing at such future time including, without limitation, contractual restrictions and satisfaction of the solvency tests imposed on the Company under applicable corporate law. There can be no assurance that the Company will pay dividends in the future.

Abbreviations$000’sthousand dollars$/bbldollars per barrel$/boedollars per barrel of oil equivalent$/GJdollars per gigajoule$/mcfdollars per thousand cubic feetbblbarrel  mbblthousand barrelsbbl/dbarrels per dayboe
barrel of oil equivalent
mboe
thousand barrel of oil equivalent
mmboe
million barrel of oil equivalent
boe/d
barrel of oil equivalent per day
GJ
gigajoule
GJ/d
gigajoules per day
mcf
thousand cubic feet
mcf/d
thousand cubic feet per day
mmcf/d
million cubic feet per day
bcf
billion cubic feet
NGLs
natural gas liquids
WTI
West Texas Intermediate
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 18:00 1mo ago
SMR INVESTOR ALERT: Contact Kirby McInerney LLP About Securities Class Action Lawsuit On Behalf of NuScale Power Corporation Investors stocknewsapi
SMR
NEW YORK, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds NuScale Power Corporation (“NuScale” or the “Company”) (NYSE:SMR) investors of the April 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment in the class action filed on behalf of investors who acquired NuScale Power Corporation securities between May 13, 2025 through November 6, 2025 (“the Class Period”).

Courts do not consider applications filed after the lead plaintiff deadline. The lead plaintiff oversees the litigation on behalf of the class and may influence key decisions, including litigation strategy and settlement. Courts regularly appoint individual investors as lead plaintiffs, not only institutions.

Follow the link below for more information:

[CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS]

What Is The Lawsuit About?

Prior to the start of the class period, NuScale entered into a global commercialization partnership with ENTRA1 Energy LLC (“ENTRA1”). The Company claimed that this critical partnership would allow the Company to take its NuScale Power Modules (“NPM”) technology from development to deployment, enabling NuScale’s NPMs to serve as meaningful, revenue-generating components in power plants.

The lawsuit alleges that (i) ENTRA1 had never built, financed, or operated any significant projects, let alone projects in the highly technical and complicated field of nuclear power generation, during its entire operating history; (ii) NuScale had entrusted its commercialization, distribution, and deployment of its NPM and hundreds of millions of dollars of NuScale capital to an entity that lacked any significant prior experience owning, financing, or operating nuclear energy generation facilities; (iii) the purported experience and qualifications attributed to ENTRA1 by defendants during the class period in fact referred to the purported experience and qualifications of the principals of the Habboush Group, a distinct entity without significant experience in the field of nuclear power generation; and (iv) as a result, NuScale’s commercialization strategy was exposed to material, undisclosed risks of failure, delays, regulatory challenges, or other negative setbacks.

On November 6, 2025, NuScale revealed that the Company’s general and administrative expenses had grown over 3,000% to $519 million during its third fiscal quarter, up from $17 million in the prior year period, due largely to NuScale’s payment of $495 million to ENTRA1 for its TVA agreement. As a result, NuScale’s quarterly net loss rose to $532 million, up from $46 million in the prior year period. On this news, the price of NuScale shares declined by $5.45 per share, or approximately 14.4%, from $37.91 per share on November 5, 2025 to close at $32.46 on November 6, 2025.

The price of NuScale stock continued to fall in subsequent days, dropping to a low of $17 per share by November 21, 2025, more than 70% below the class period high of more than $57 per share.

[CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION]

What Should I Do?

If you purchased or otherwise acquired NuScale securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[LEARN MORE ABOUT THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts
Kirby McInerney LLP
Lauren Molinaro, Esq.
212-699-1171
https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
[email protected]
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 18:00 1mo ago
Future Mineral Closes Second Tranche of Private Placement stocknewsapi
SULMD
March 18, 2026 18:00 ET  | Source: Future Mineral Resources Inc.

TORONTO, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Future Mineral Resources Inc. (“Future Mineral” or the “Company”) (TSX: FMR) is pleased to announce that it has closed a second tranche (the “Second Tranche”) of a previously announced non-brokered private placement financing of up to 15 million common shares at a price of $0.30 per share for gross proceeds of up to $4.5m (the “Offering”). For more information about the Offering and first tranche closing (the “First Tranche”), please see the Company’s press releases dated January 7, 2026, February 2, 2026, and March 13, 2026, each of which is available under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

Pursuant to the Second Tranche, Future Mineral issued 316,667 common shares at a price of $0.30 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $95,000. The securities issued in connection with the Second Tranche are subject to a statutory four month hold period, which expires on July 19, 2026. Completion of the Offering (including the First Tranche and Second Tranche) is subject to receipt of final approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange. No finder’s fees were paid in connection with the Second Tranche. The net proceeds of the Second Tranche are expected to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.

About Future Mineral

Future Mineral is a venture capital company focused on acquiring and advancing brownfield, development-stage and early production-stage mining projects in the Americas and Europe.

Future Mineral Resources Inc.

On behalf of the Board

“Fred Leigh”
Chief Executive Officer

For more information:
On behalf of the Board
“Fred Leigh”, Chief Executive Officer
[email protected]
(416) 861-2267

Cautionary statements

This press release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the First Tranche, Second Tranche, and the Offering, including the Company’s intended use of net proceeds, receipt of final approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange, and other matters related thereto. Generally, forward looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Future Mineral to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward looking information, including but not limited to: receipt of necessary approvals; general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; future mineral prices and market demand; accidents, labour disputes and shortages and other risks of the mining industry. Although Future Mineral has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking information. Future Mineral does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.

THE TSX HAS NOT REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS NEWS RELEASE.
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 18:00 1mo ago
TCOM SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Securities Fraud Lawsuit Filed on Behalf of Trip.com Group Limited Investors – Contact Kirby McInerney LLP by May 11, 2026 stocknewsapi
TCOM
NEW YORK, March 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kirby McInerney LLP reminds investors who purchased Trip.com Group Limited (“Trip.com” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:TCOM) securities to contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests in the securities fraud class action lawsuit at no cost.

If you suffered a loss on your Trip.com investments, you have until May 11, 2026 to request lead plaintiff appointment. Courts do not consider lead plaintiff applications submitted after this deadline. The lead plaintiff oversees the litigation on behalf of the class and may influence key decisions, including litigation strategy and settlement. Courts regularly appoint individual investors as lead plaintiffs, not only institutions.

Follow the link below for more information about the lawsuit:

[CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS]

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased securities during the period of April 30, 2024 through January 13, 2026, inclusive (“the Class Period”). The lawsuit alleges that the Company recklessly understated the regulatory risk facing Trip.com as a result of its monopolistic business activities.

On January 14, 2026, Trip.com disclosed that it had received a notice of investigation regarding China’s Anti-Monopoly Law from China’s State Administration for Market Regulation. On this news, the price of Trip.com shares declined by $12.90 per share, or approximately 17.1%, from $75.68 per share on January 13, 2026 to close at $62.78 on January 14, 2026.

[CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION]

What Should I Do?

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Trip.com securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[HOW CAN I PROTECT MY RIGHTS?]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts
Kirby McInerney LLP
Lauren Molinaro, Esq.
212-699-1171
https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
[email protected]
2026-03-18 22:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 18:00 1mo ago
Tantalus Systems Holding Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results stocknewsapi
TGMPF
Burnaby, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 18, 2026) - Tantalus Systems (TSX: GRID) (OTCQX: TGMPF) ("Tantalus" or the "Company"), a technology company dedicated to helping utilities modernize their distribution grids by harnessing the power of data, is pleased to announce its financial and operating results for the three-month period and year ended December 31, 2025.

All amounts are presented in this news release are in United States dollars ("U.S. dollars"), unless otherwise indicated.

Q4 2025 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Revenue increased by approximately 19% year-over-year to $14.9 million, reflecting a new corporate milestone for revenue generated in a quarter. Revenue from Connected Devices and Infrastructure ("Connected Devices") increased by $1.6 million or 21% and Utility Software Applications and Services ("Software and Services") revenue increased by $0.7 million or approximately 15%. The increases in revenue were a result of adding new customers and continuing to expand deployments with existing accounts. Recurring Revenue1 increased by 38% to $4.1 million and represented 28% of total revenue in the quarter.

Gross Profit1 improved by 27% to $8.3 million from the prior year with contributions from both operating segments. Overall Gross Profit Margin1, on a consolidated basis, increased by 350 basis points to 56% primarily due to the mix of products shipped within the Connected Devices segment and strong contributions from the Software and Services segment.

Income for the period was $179,000 compared to income of $289,000 last year.

The Company delivered positive Adjusted EBITDA1 of approximately $1.3 million, which was effectively in-line with the prior year (December 31, 2024: $1.4 million) as the Company increased headcount and incurred higher operating expenses.

The Company generated positive Cash Flow from Operating Activities of $3.3 million.

At December 31, 2025, Tantalus had available liquidity of $21.1 million compared to $18.0 million as at December 31, 2024. The available liquidity was comprised of a cash balance of $12.6 million and borrowing availability of $8.5 million under its revolving line of credit.2025 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The Company delivered record revenue of $54.1 million, representing 22% growth year-over-year. Revenue from Connected Devices increased by 28% to $35.3 million as a result of higher sales volumes and Software and Services revenue increased by 13% to $18.8 million as a result of higher annual maintenance billings. Recurring Revenue1 increased by 20% to $13.9 million, representing 26% of total revenue for the year.

Annual Recurring Revenue ("ARR")1 grew by approximately 14% year-over-year to $14.5 million as of December 31, 2025 (December 31, 2024: $12.7 million).

Gross Profit1 increased by 23% to $29.6 million while Gross Profit Margin1, on a consolidated basis, remained stable at approximately 55%.

Loss for the year was $992,000, compared to a loss of $2.6 million last year with the improvement arising from revenue and margin growth.

Diluted Loss per Share was $0.02 compared to $0.05 in the prior year period.

The Company delivered record Adjusted EBITDA1 of $3.4 million, representing approximately 156% growth year-over-year (December 31, 2024: $1.3 million). The growth in Adjusted EBITDA reflects operating leverage in the business model as the Company scales revenue.

The Company generated positive Cash Flow from Operating Activities of $4.7 million compared to $2.6 million in the prior year.

"Tantalus is grateful to our team, customers and partners who helped the Company deliver another year of commercial and financial milestones, including record results in revenue, adjusted EBITDA and sales orders," said Peter Londa, President & CEO of Tantalus. "We continue to invest in innovative solutions that deliver cost-effective and low-risk paths to improve our customers' systems and operations. Our vision for data-centric distribution grid modernization and Unified Intelligence is resonating with an expanding number of utilities and positions us to maintain our growth trajectory heading into 2026."

OTHER KEY DEVELOPMENTS

Sales Order Conversion: During Q4 2025, the Company converted $11.0 million in orders from its sales pipeline bringing the total amount in 2025 to a record level of $64.9 million. The results represented approximately 27% growth year-over-year and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x.

Growth of User Community: The Company added 5 new utilities in Q4 2025 and 17 for the full year, demonstrating a continued ability to convert new accounts from its sales pipeline.

TRUSense Gateway™ Progress: As of the date of this news release, 66 utilities submitted orders to trial, pilot and/or deploy the TRUSense Gateway. The adoption of the TRUSense Gateway is being driven by a combination of existing customers seeking to enhance deployments of Tantalus' broader offerings and utilities that are ordering from the Company for the first time to accelerate their grid modernization journeys.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Appointment of New Board Member: On January 26, 2026, the Company announced the appointment of Susanna Zagar to its Board of Directors. Ms. Zagar most recently served as the CEO of the Ontario Energy Board and brings broad industry and governance expertise to the Company.

Completion of CAD$23.0 Million Bought Deal Financing: On February 9, 2026, the Company completed a bought deal offering of 4,299,575 shares at a price of CAD$5.35 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately CAD$23.0 million. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for sales and marketing, strategic growth initiatives, partial repayment of the Company's Term Loan, capital expenditures, research and development, and working capital and general corporate expenses.

Changes in Import Tariffs: On February 20, 2026, the US Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. As a result, on the same day two executive orders were issued, one prospectively suspending the original IEEPA tariffs, and another establishing the continuing suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment for certain imports to the US and the mechanisms for continuing to collect duties on such shipments and the rates of such duties. To the balance sheet date, $2.1 million has been paid in tariffs. There remains uncertainty as to any right of refund of the tariffs and the process required to collect eligible refunds (if any), as well as any contractual obligations to return amounts previously collected from customers.

The Company will hold a conference call and webcast to discuss the financial results on Thursday, March 19, 2026, at 11:00 am Eastern Time.

CONFERENCE CALL

Participant Dial In (Toll Free):
1-844-854-4410Participant International Dial In:1-412-317-5791Participants, please ask to be joined to the Tantalus Systems call.

Webcast URL: https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=upG0Skf1

REPLAY INFORMATION

A conference call and webcast replay will be available until March 26, 2026. To access the conference call replay, please see details below:

U.S./Canada Toll Free: 1-855-669-9658International Toll:  1-412-317-0088 Replay Access Code: 1746245 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Information included in this press release is a summary of results and financial statement excerpts and should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements ("Annual Financial Statements") and related Management's Discussion & Analysis ("MD&A") for the three-month period and year ended December 31, 2025 which can be found on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and is also available on the Company's website at www.tantalus.com.

All comparisons presented in this press release are between the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2025 and the three-month and twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2024, unless otherwise indicated. In addition, all results are reported in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these following consolidated financial statements and can be found on the Company's website at www.tantalus.com or on www.sedarplus.ca.

TANTALUS SYSTEMS HOLDING INC.
Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars except for shares and per share amounts)

Note
Year ended
December
31, 2025

Year ended
December
31, 2024
 

Revenues 17 $ 54,113
$ 44,311
Cost of sales 5, 17
24,519

20,289

29,594

24,022
 

 

 
Expenses

 

 
Sales and marketing 12(d)
10,465

8,601
Research and development 12(d)
6,884

7,003
General and administrative12(d)
10,073

7,928
Depreciation and amortization

1,670

1,752

29,092

25,284
 

 

 
Operating income (loss)

502

(1,262) 

 

 
Other (expenses) earnings

 

 
Foreign exchange gain (loss)

(328)
233
Interest income

95

-
Finance expenses13
(1,165)
(1,587)Unrealized gain on loan modification 10
16

-

(1,382)
(1,354) 

 

 
Loss before income taxes

(880)
(2,616)Income tax expense14
112

12
Loss for the period

(992)
(2,628)Foreign currency translation adjustment

2

(10)Total comprehensive loss for the period
$(989)$(2,638)

 

 
Loss per share (basic and diluted)
$(0.02)$(0.05) 

 

 
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding (basic and diluted)15
51,195,989

48,386,926
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
TANTALUS SYSTEMS HOLDING INC.
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

December 31,

December 31,

Note
2025

2024
Assets10

Current assets

Cash
$12,618
$13,219
Accounts receivable 4
9,870

10,011
Inventory5
7,954

4,832
Prepaid expenses and other assets

2,004

1,829
Total current assets

32,446

29,891
Property and equipment6
1,160

731
Right-of-use assets8
1,462

2,038
Intangible assets 7
4,674

5,443
Goodwill7
3,445

3,445
Total assets
$43,187
$41,548
 

 

 
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 
Current liabilities

 

 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities9$18,453
$15,629
Deferred revenue and deposits

8,209

6,055
Lease liabilities11
746

843
Line of credit10
-

3,679
Term loan - current portion10
1,596

1,535
Total current liabilities

29,004

27,740
Accrued warranty9
525

-
Deferred revenue and deposits

13

103
Lease liabilities

976

1,392
Term loan10
5,167

5,372
Total liabilities

35,685

34,607
Total shareholders' equity

7,502

6,941
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
$43,187
$41,548
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 

 
TANTALUS SYSTEMS HOLDING INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)

Note
Year ended
December 31,
2025

Year ended
December 31,
2024
Cash (used in) provided by

Operating Activities

Loss for the period
$ (992) $ (2,628)Adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to net cash flows:   
  
Unrealized foreign exchange gain (loss)

171

(76) Depreciation of equipment

324

340
Amortization of intangible assets

770

770
Amortization of right-of-use asset

576

642
Share-based compensation 12 (d)
1,188

596
Finance expenses

1,165

1,587
Amortization of deferred financing cost

21

21
Unrealized gain on loan modification

(14)
-
Changes in Non-Cash Operating Working Capital

 

 
Accounts receivable4
141

(2,140) Inventory5
(3,122)
1,803
Prepaid expenses and other assets

(177)
(363) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities9
2,825

1,901
Accrued warranty9
525

-
Deferred revenue and deposits

2,064

1,772
Lease payments for interest

(155)
(202)Interest paid on loans10
(593)
(1,385)Net cash provided by Operating Activities

4,715

2,638
Investing Activities

 

 
Purchase of equipment

(753)
(409) Net Cash used in Investing Activities

(753)
(409)Financing Activities

 

 
Repayment of indebtedness

(4,245)
(4,821) Proceeds from indebtedness10
-

4,000
Change in restricted cash

-

673
Repayment of lease liabilities

(690)
(659) Issuance of common shares from financing

-

7,296
Issuance of common shares - other12 (b)(c)
363

-
Share issuance costs

-

(632)Net Cash (used in) provided by Financing Activities

(4,572)
5,857
Effect of foreign exchange on cash

9

(20)(Decrease) Increase in cash

(601)
8,066
Cash, beginning of period

13,219

5,154
Cash, end of period
$ 12,618
$ 13,219
NON-IFRS AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES

This press release contains certain financial measures that do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. Therefore, these financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Investors are cautioned these measures should not be construed as an alternative to income (loss) or to cash provided by (used in) operating, investing, financing activities, determined in accordance with IFRS, as indicators of our performance.

We provide these additional non-IFRS measures, non-IFRS ratios and supplementary financial measures to assist investors in determining the Company's ability to generate earnings and cash provided by (used in) operating activities.

a) "EBITDA" is comprised of income (loss) adjusted for interest, income tax and depreciation and amortization. Management believes that EBITDA is a useful indicator for investors, and is used by management, in evaluating the operating performance of the Company.

b) "Adjusted EBITDA" is comprised of income (loss) adjusted for interest, income tax, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation, foreign exchange gain (loss) and other income / expenses not attributable to the operations of the Company. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is a useful indicator for investors, and is used by management, in evaluating the operating performance of the Company. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company excluded non-recurring items including restructuring expenses in our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA as these expenses are not representative of ongoing operating performance.

This press release also refers to the following non-IFRS ratios:

c) "Gross Profit" is comprised of revenues less cost of sales. Management believes that Gross Profit is a useful indicator for investors, and is used by management, in evaluating the operating performance of the Company.

d) "Gross Profit Margin" is comprised of Gross Profit expressed as a percentage of the Company's revenues. Management believes that Gross Profit Margin is a useful indicator for investors, and is used by management, in evaluating the operating performance of the Company.

e) "Adjusted EBITDA Margin" is comprised of Adjusted EBITDA expressed as a percentage of the Company's revenues. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA Margin is a useful indicator for investors, and is used by management, in evaluating the operating performance of the Company.

This press release also refers to the following supplementary financial measures:

f) "Recurring Revenue" is comprised of the Company's revenues recognized in a period that are recurring in nature and attributable to its analytics, subscriptions and software as a service ("SaaS") offerings, hosting services, software maintenance and technical support agreement services.

g) "Annual Recurring Revenue" or "ARR" is comprised of the Company's Recurring Revenue as expressed on a forward-looking annualized revenue attributable to its analytics, subscriptions and SaaS offerings, hosting services, software maintenance and technical support services agreements at a point in time.

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Three months
ended
December 31, 2025
Three months
ended
December 31, 2024
Twelve months
ended
December 31, 2025
Twelve months
ended
December 31, 2024
Revenue $ 14,925
$ 12,589
$ 54,113
$ 44,311
Gross Profit
8,347

6,594

29,594

24,022
Gross Profit Margin % 1
56%

52%

55%

54%

 

 

 

 
Adjusted EBITDA 1 $ 1,335
$ 1,436
$ 3,359
$ 1,311
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 1
9%

11%

6%

3%

 

 

 

 
Income (loss) for the period $ 179
$ 289
$ (992) $ (2,628)Income (loss) per share (diluted) $0.00
$0.01
$(0.02)$(0.05)Weighted average shares outstanding:
 

 

 

 
Basic
51,513,774

50,845,942

51,195,989

48,386,926
Diluted
57,968,710

57,363,615

51,195,989

48,386,926
 
  

  

  

  
Cash $ 12,618
$ 13,219
$ 12,618
$ 13,219
GROSS PROFIT1 AND GROSS PROFIT MARGIN1 CALCULATIONS

Three months ended December 31, 2025Connected
Devices

 %
Software and Services

 %
 Total

 %
Revenue$9,340

100.0%
$5,585

100.0%
$14,925

100.0%
Cost of sales
5,773

61.8%

805

14.4%

6,578

44.1%
Gross Profit$3,567

38.2%
$4,780

85.6%
$8,347

55.9%
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Percentage of Total Gross Profit
43%

 

57%

 

100%

 
    

 
  

 
  

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Three months ended December 31, 2024Connected
Devices

%
Software and Services

%
 Total

%
Revenue$7,713

100.0%
$4,876

100.0%
$12,589

100.0%
Cost of sales
4,927

63.9%

1,068

21.9%

5,995

47.6%
Gross Profit$2,786

36.1%
$3,808

78.1%
$6,594

52.4%
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Percentage of Total Gross Profit
42%

 

58%

 

100%

 
GROSS PROFIT1 AND GROSS PROFIT MARGIN1 CALCULATIONS CONTINUED

Twelve months ended December 31, 2025 Connected
Devices

 %
Software and Services

 %
  Total

 %
Revenue$35,289

100.0%
$18,824

100.0%
$54,113

100.0%
Cost of sales
20,298

57.5%

4,221

22.4%

24,519

45.3%
Gross Profit$14,991

42.5%
$14,603

77.6%
$29,594

54.7%
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Percentage of Total Gross Profit
51%

 

49%

 

100%

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
Twelve months ended December 31, 2024 Connected
Devices  %   Software and Services  %   Total   %  Revenue$27,625

100.0%
$16,686

100.0%
$44,311

100.0%
Cost of sales
16,364

59.2%

3,925

23.5%

20,289

45.8%
Gross Profit$11,260

40.8%
$12,761

76.5%
$24,022

54.2%
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Percentage of Total Gross Profit
47%

 

53%

 

100%

 
RECONCILIATION OF INCOME (LOSS) TO ADJUSTED EBITDA1

Three months ended December 31, 2025

Three months ended December 31, 2024

Twelve months ended December 31, 2025

Twelve months ended December 31, 2024
Income (loss) for the period $179
$289
$(992)$(2,628)Finance expense
244

351

1,165

1,587
Interest income
(62)
-

(95)
-
Income tax expense (recovery)
87

(10)
112

12
Depreciation and amortization
423

429

1,670

1,752
EBITDA
871

1,060

1,860

723
Stock-based compensation
387

212

1,188

596
Foreign exchange
76

(61)
328

(233)Restructing cost
-

225

-

225
Unrealized gain on loan modification
-

-

(16)
-
Adjusted EBITDA $1,335
$1,436
$3,359
$1,311
ABOUT TANTALUS SYSTEMS HOLDING INC. (TSX: GRID) (OTCQX: TGMPF)

Tantalus is a technology company dedicated to helping utilities modernize their distribution grids by harnessing the power of data across all their devices and systems deployed throughout the entire distribution grid. We offer a grid modernization platform across multiple levels: intelligent connected devices, communications networks, data management, enterprise applications and analytics. Our solutions provide utilities with the flexibility they need to get the most value from existing infrastructure investments while leveraging advanced capabilities to plan for future requirements. All our technology is grounded in a data-centric approach that is designed to help utilities find the most cost-effective path to grid modernization with the least risk. Ultimately, we deliver Unified Intelligence to utilities of all kinds, so they can leverage data and insights across their entire grid, no matter what devices, systems or vendors they choose to work with. Learn more at https://www.tantalus.com/.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This news release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information is generally identifiable by use of the words "believes", "may", "plans", "will", "anticipates", "intends", "could", "estimates", "expects", "forecasts", "projects" and similar expressions, and the negative of such expressions. Forward-looking information in this news release includes statements such as those relating to the ability of Tantalus' solutions, including the TRUSense Gateway, the Company's growth trajectory, use of proceeds, the Company's plans, objectives, strategy and expectations for its business, results of operations and financial condition, the adoption of the Company's solutions by customers in accordance with the Company's ordinary business practices and terms and the anticipated risks to the business operations of the Company and its customers.

To the extent any forward-looking information in this news release constitutes a "financial outlook" within the meaning of securities laws, such information is being provided because management's estimate of the future financial performance of Tantalus is useful to investors, and readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and that they should not place undue reliance on such information.

In connection with the forward-looking information contained in this news release, Tantalus has made numerous assumptions, regarding, among other things: increasing demand for the Company's solutions in support of utilities' grid modernization efforts, the commercialization and adoption of the TRUSense Gateway, its ability to capitalize on growth opportunities and implement its growth strategy, its ability to retain key personnel, its ability to maintain existing customer relationships and to continue to expand its customers' use of the Company's products and solutions, its ability to acquire new customers, its ability to enhance the Company's offerings to remain at the forefront of its industry, the impact of competition, the successful integration of future acquisitions, the impact of tariffs and any changes to tariffs on the Company's business and financial condition, the ability of the Company to execute on its plans, the absence of material adverse changes in the Company's business, its industry or the global economy and that the risks and uncertainties described under the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's Annual Information Form dated on or about March 18, 2026 will not materialize. While Tantalus considers these assumptions to be reasonable, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies. Additionally, there are known and unknown risk factors which could cause Tantalus' actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information contained herein. A complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties facing Tantalus is disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Information Form dated on or about March 18, 2026, as well as those risk factors included with Tantalus' continuous disclosure filings with Canadian securities regulatory authorities available at www.sedarplus.ca. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the opinions, estimates or assumptions underlying the forward-looking information prove incorrect, actual results or future events might vary materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking information. The opinions, estimates or assumptions referred to above should be considered carefully by prospective investors.

All forward-looking information herein is qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement, and Tantalus disclaims any obligation to revise or update any such forward-looking information or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking information contained herein to reflect future results, events or developments, except as required by law.

1 See definitions for Non-IFRS and Other Financial Measures above.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289034

Source: Tantalus Systems Holding Inc.

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:18 1mo ago
Thena's THE Token Extends Slide After Venus Supply‑Cap Exploit cryptonews
THE
TL;DR:

 THE token has suffered a 44% devaluation, dropping from $0.27 to $0.15 following the supply-cap manipulation on Venus Protocol on March 15.  The attacker extracted $14.9 million in assets (BNB, CAKE, BTCB) after artificially inflating borrowing power by accumulating 14.5 million tokens.  Venus Protocol reports $2.15 million in bad debt, while Thena seeks to incentivize holders with a drastic increase in yields (APR). The recent supply manipulation attack on Venus Protocol caused a crisis of confidence in the DeFi ecosystem, with Thena’s THE token serving as the centerpiece of the exploit. In response, Thena clarified that its smart contracts remain intact; however, the market reaction was overwhelmingly bearish.

Since the incident, THE’s trading volume has decreased by more than 51%. According to technical analysis, the attacker funded the operation with 7,447 ETH directly from Tornado Cash, successfully controlling 84% of the supply cap for the THE lending market on Venus before executing the liquidity drain.

Recovery Strategies and Impact on Venus Protocol In contrast to the THE token, Venus’s governance asset (XVS) showed resilience over the last week, increasing by 12%. This suggests that investors attribute the responsibility to the specific architecture of a single lending market on Venus rather than a systemic failure of both protocols.

For its part, the Thena team activated emergency measures to stem the capital outflow. On Tuesday, March 17, they confirmed that Single Sided Vaults will receive a significant boost in their Annual Percentage Rates (APR), fueled by commissions generated during the peak volatility of the attack.

In summary, the market remains cautious regarding Thena’s ability to restore value after being linked to $2.15 million in bad debt. The effectiveness of the new governance incentives will be decisive in determining whether the token manages to stabilize above $0.15 or if selling pressure will continue to dominate price action.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:19 1mo ago
U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs Extend Winning Streak To Seven Days For First Time In 2026 cryptonews
BTC
Add ZyCrypto News On Google

US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded their first seven-day inflow streak of 2026, attracting roughly $1.2 billion in fresh allocations this week.

The funds saw $199.4 million in net inflows on Tuesday, continuing the recent streak of institutional buying that kicked off earlier in the week and helped lift prices after weeks of sluggish performance.

The inflows were largely driven by a massive $169 million pouring into iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), according to data curated by SoSoValue. Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) followed with $24.4 million in fresh capital, while offerings from ARK Invest & 21Shares and VanEck also posted net inflows, underscoring broad-based investor demand.

With Tuesday’s inflows, spot Bitcoin ETFs have pulled in roughly $1.17 billion over the past seven trading days, extending a powerful wave of investor demand. The funds are now on track for a fourth straight week of net inflows— their longest weekly streak since September—signaling sustained momentum in the market.

The ETF rebound has aligned with a broader surge across crypto investment products, which have pulled in about $2.7 billion over three consecutive weeks, pushing year-to-date inflows to roughly $1.2 billion, as ZyCrypto reported earlier.

Advertisement  

The bullish ETF flows are largely unaffected by the rising tensions in the Middle East around the Strait of Hormuz and soaring oil prices, indicating BTC’s growing role as a geopolitical hedge rather than just a risk asset.

Overall, the BTC ETFs now command $91.83 billion in net assets, with cumulative inflows climbing to $56.14 billion, while daily trading activity surged to around $4.93 billion—a clear sign of intensifying market participation.

Spot Altcoin ETFs Also Post Inflows On Tuesday, spot Ethereum ETFs saw net inflows of $138.3 million, continuing a streak of six straight days of gains. XRP ETFs posted $4.64 million in inflows, marking their first increase since March 4, while Solana ETFs attracted $17.8 million.

Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a 68-page guidance on Tuesday stating that most cryptocurrencies are not considered securities.

This move, seen as a landmark shift for the crypto industry, departs from the previous Gensler-era SEC approach, which aimed to treat certain tokens, including Ripple’s XRP, as securities.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:22 1mo ago
Analyst Sounds Alarm: BTC Dominance Break Could Trigger Massive Altcoin Boom—or Total Collapse cryptonews
BTC
TL;DR

BTC.D has spent six months between 58% and 60%, turning Bitcoin dominance into the market’s main signal for what comes next. A break below 58% would support an ETH/BTC move above 0.0320 and strengthen the case for a genuine altcoin season. A break above 60% could send dominance toward 63% or 64%, signaling continued Bitcoin concentration, weaker ETH/BTC performance, and deeper altcoin stress across the market from here. Bitcoin dominance is turning into crypto’s clearest pressure gauge, and the next break could decide whether altcoins ignite or slide into painful stretch. BTC.D has spent six months boxed between 58% and 60%, a range analyst Ash Crypto described as the corridor controlling the market’s direction. That framing matters because the issue is no longer simple Bitcoin strength. It is whether capital keeps clustering around BTC or starts rotating outward. In this setup, dominance looks less like a background metric and more like the switch that could determine the next phase for Ethereum and smaller tokens.

Two charts. One story.

This is the most important setup in crypto right now.

1) ETH/BTC is printing the same bear trap for the third time.

Break above 0.0320 and ETH starts outperforming Bitcoin.

Break below 0.0280 and new lows follow.

2) BTC Dominance.

BTC.D has been… pic.twitter.com/wyrO0zWsIk

— Ash Crypto (@AshCrypto) March 18, 2026

BTC dominance is becoming the pivot for altcoins The bullish altcoin scenario begins if Bitcoin dominance loses support and money starts rotating out of BTC into Ethereum and the wider market. Ash Crypto argued that a break below 58% would signal that capital is finally leaving Bitcoin for altcoins. For that view to gain confirmation, the ETH/BTC pair would need to break above 0.0320, the level the analyst identified as the start of a genuine altcoin season. That threshold looks close because ETH/BTC was trading around 0.0314, putting the market near a trigger traders are watching.

The bearish alternative is just as forceful because a break above 60% would imply institutions are concentrating on Bitcoin while altcoins continue to lose relative ground. Ash Crypto said such a move could push BTC.D toward 63% or 64%, extending Bitcoin’s market share and driving the ETH/BTC ratio to fresh lows. That warning lands while Bitcoin has been mostly flat over the last 24 hours above $74,000, but Ethereum has shown momentum. ETH is up about 14% over seven days and around 18% across the last 14 and 30 days, giving altcoin bulls reason to stay engaged.

That divergence is why BTC dominance now looks bigger than a chart pattern and more like a market-wide vote on risk appetite. Ethereum has risen 22% year over year while Bitcoin has fallen nearly 11% over the same period. At the same time, ETH’s SuperTrend indicator shifted from “Sell” to “Buy” for the first time since September 2025. Analyst Ali Martinez flagged $2,400 and $2,600 as the next levels to watch. For traders, the conclusion is stark: this dominance range is no longer background noise. It may decide whether altcoins boom or break.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:24 1mo ago
Jerome Powell Says No Rate Cuts Until Inflation Shows Progress, Bitcoin Crashes cryptonews
BTC
Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated that there won’t be rate cuts unless they see progress on inflation. This came as he signaled that bringing inflation down towards their 2% target is their primary focus for this year, especially with the labor market appearing to stabilize. Bitcoin quickly crashed on the back of his remarks, dropping below $71,000.

Jerome Powell Warns About Inflation, Bitcoin Dumps During his FOMC press conference, the Fed chair said there won’t be rate cuts if they don’t see inflation progress toward their 2% target. “The thing that’s really important that we see this year is progress on inflation through a reduction in goods inflation as the one-time effects on prices of tariffs go through the system, go through the economy,” he said.

Jerome Powell also noted that near-term inflation expectations have risen in recent weeks, with the U.S.-Iran war driving up oil prices and putting inflationary pressure on the U.S. economy. He said that these higher energy prices will push up overall inflation in the near term. Meanwhile, the Fed chair admitted that it is too soon to know the full effects of the Middle East tensions.

Bitcoin sharply dropped following the Fed chair’s comments on inflation, dropping below $71,000. TradingView data shows that the leading crypto is currently trading at around $71,350, down over 3% today.

Source: TradingView; Bitcoin daily chart As CoinGape reported, the crypto market had crashed earlier in the day as Israel attacked Iran’s South Pars gas field, sending energy prices rising. However, the market rebounded ahead of Jerome Powell’s speech, with BTC rising as high as $72,000.

Meanwhile, the Fed chair noted that the Fed remains in a difficult situation as it looks to balance both risks of inflation and unemployment. He said that the oil shock could put some downward pressure on employment. However, he chose not to comment on which mandate is likely to take priority, even as the labor market remains at risk with rising inflation.

Most Members Do Not See Rate Hike As Base Jerome Powell said that most FOMC participants do not see a rate hike as the base case for their next move. As CoinGape reported, the latest dot plot from today’s FOMC meeting shows that the current median estimate is still one cut this year.

However, seven participants expect zero cuts this year, a possibility that is becoming more likely due to the U.S.-Iran conflict. The Fed chair noted that the dot plot doesn’t bind officials to their projections, and that officials are likely to make their decisions on a meeting-to-meeting basis.

The Fed is expected to hold rates steady at the April FOMC meeting. CME FedWatch data show a 97% chance of rates remaining unchanged and a 3% chance of a rate hike.

Source: CME FedWatch
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:29 1mo ago
Fold posts $69.6M net loss but doubles down on bitcoin credit card expansion cryptonews
BTC
Fold just finished its debut year as a public company. The report card is… mixed.

The bitcoin-focused financial services firm reported a net loss of $69.6 million for the full year 2025, according to its annual filing released Tuesday. Revenue climbed 34% year-over-year to $31.8 million, but operating losses ballooned from $5.8 million to $27.7 million — nearly a fivefold increase that makes the top-line growth feel like a consolation prize.

The numbers behind the red ink Fold’s adjusted EBITDA loss came in at $17.2 million, translating to an adjusted loss per share of $0.41. For a company trading on Nasdaq under the ticker FFLD, those are numbers that test investor patience.

The gap between the $69.6 million net loss and the $27.7 million operating loss deserves some explaining. A significant chunk — over $9.6 million — came from a one-time charge to retire two outstanding convertible bonds. Think of convertible bonds as IOUs that can morph into company stock. Killing them off costs money upfront but removes future dilution risk for shareholders.

CEO Will Reeves framed the move as strategic housekeeping.

“We closed our first full year as a public company with strong execution against the goals we set coming into 2025. [The bond retirement] simplifies the balance sheet, removes structural overhang, and directs financing solely to the growth of our operating businesses.”

The remaining gap likely reflects non-cash charges common to newly public companies — stock-based compensation, depreciation, and the various accounting gremlins that inflate GAAP losses beyond what the business actually burns through in cash.

On the growth side, Fold added 13,000 new customers during the year, pushing its total to 84,000 verified accounts. Transaction volume hit $960 million, a 46% increase. The company also noted a 3% year-over-year uptick in per-customer transaction volume to $215 million total, suggesting existing users aren’t just sticking around — they’re spending slightly more.

The credit card bet Founded in 2019, Fold built its brand on a simple premise: earn Bitcoin rewards instead of airline miles. The company offers an app for buying, selling, and staking BTC alongside a bitcoin payments card that’s been its flagship product.

Now the firm is pushing into new territory with two recent launches. The Fold Credit Card extends its Bitcoin rewards model beyond debit spending, while Fold For Business targets enterprise customers — a potentially lucrative but crowded market where competitors like BitPay and Strike already operate.

Here’s the thing about the credit card play: it’s expensive. Credit cards require capital reserves, fraud infrastructure, and regulatory compliance that dwarf what a debit card demands. For a company already losing $27.7 million a year on operations, layering on a capital-intensive product line is a bold gamble.

But the logic isn’t crazy. The US credit card market processes roughly $5 trillion annually. Even capturing a sliver of that with a Bitcoin-native rewards proposition could dwarf Fold’s current $960 million transaction volume. The question is whether the company’s balance sheet can survive the scaling period.

What this means for investors Fold sits in an awkward middle ground that’s familiar to growth-stage fintech companies. Revenue is growing at a healthy clip, but losses are growing faster. The 34% revenue increase looks solid until you notice operating losses expanded by 377%.

The convertible bond retirement is genuinely positive for existing shareholders — removing potential dilution signals management is thinking about equity value, not just top-line growth. But the core business still needs to demonstrate a path to profitability before that goodwill translates into share price appreciation.

Watch two things going forward. First, customer acquisition cost relative to lifetime value — 13,000 new accounts is fine, but not if each one costs more to acquire than it generates. Second, the credit card’s early adoption metrics. If Fold can convert its existing 84,000 debit users into credit card holders, the economics improve dramatically since the customer acquisition cost drops to nearly zero.

The competitive landscape is also shifting. With Bitcoin hovering near all-time highs and mainstream financial institutions warming to crypto products, Fold’s window of differentiation may be narrowing. A Bitcoin rewards card felt novel in 2020. In 2025, every neobank has one.

Bottom line: Fold is spending aggressively to build a Bitcoin-native financial ecosystem, and the losses reflect it. Revenue growth is real but not yet sufficient to offset the cost of ambition. The credit card expansion is the right strategic move — if the company can fund it long enough to reach scale.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:40 1mo ago
Ethereum Foundation deploys 3,400 ETH (approximately $7.6M) into Morpho cryptonews
ETH MORPHO
The Ethereum Foundation deployed 3,400 ETH tokens into Morpho in a move that seemed straightforward to some but left others wondering why Aave, the largest Ethereum DeFi protocol negvenever got the nod. 

In a thread posted on X today, March 18, 2025, the Ethereum Foundation announced that they transferred roughly $7.6 million worth of ETH into Morpho’s yield-bearing vaults, with 1,000 ETH specifically allocated to Morpho Vaults V2, the protocol’s latest architecture built around contracts that cannot be upgraded or interfered with by any administrator once deployed.

The move is not an isolated event either. In October 2025, the Foundation had already committed 2,400 ETH and approximately $6 million in stablecoins to Morpho, claiming it was part of a bigger strategy to move away from periodically selling ETH to fund their operations. 

The criteria for the deployment In June 2025, the foundation, through Hsiao-Wei Wang, published a treasury policy to establish a framework it called “Defipunk,” which is a set of requirements that all future on-chain deployments must satisfy before the foundation can deploy into them. 

Some of the requirements include permissionless access, self-custody, open-source licensing, privacy, open development processes, and what the document describes as “maximally trustless core logic.”

The policy was also explicit about licensing, stating that contracts must use a free/libre open-source license (either copyleft, such as AGPL, or permissive, like MIT/Apache). However, source-available licenses like the Business Source License (or BSL) specifically do not qualify. 

Luckily, Morpho Vaults V2 and Morpho Blue V1 both operate under GPL 2.0. 

For immutability, the policy stated that the Foundation would avoid “admin keys with broad powers” and instead favor protocols where “fundamental logic of the protocol is non-upgradeable or governed by a highly-decentralized, time-locked and transparent process.” 

Morpho also clears this requirement as its V2’s core contracts are fully immutable once deployed, with no chances for administrative override of any kind.

The policy also went ahead to name specific patterns in the current DeFi space that it would not support. 

Apparently, the policy would not accept “backdoor shutdown mechanisms or funds extraction functions, excessive reliance on multisigs or MPC, pervasive use of whitelists, centralized and surveilled UIs.” 

It also stated that these patterns “leave both DeFi markets and participants exposed to systemic vulnerabilities.”

Why did the Ethereum Foundation not choose Aave? The Ethereum Foundation did not mention Aave anywhere in its post today or in the June 2025 policy document. However, to the skeptic, it’s hard not to read terminologies about admin keys, backdoor extraction functions, and governance transparency failures without drawing parallels to the crisis that has rocked Aave publicly since December 2025.

Apparently, swap revenue from Aave’s CoW Swap integration was found in a wallet controlled by Aave Labs (instead of the DAO treasury). Marc Zeller, the founder of the Aave Chan Initiative and its most influential governance delegate, put the figure at around $51 million in unapproved fees after publishing an audit of Aave Labs’ historical funding on February 25. 

BGD Labs, the firm responsible for building and maintaining Aave V3, also announced on February 20 that it would not renew its contract after April 1 due to centralization concerns and Aave Labs’ apparent attacks on V3 to promote V4.

The governance crisis reached its climax on March 1, when the “Aave Will Win” funding proposal (requesting up to $42.5 million in stablecoins and 75,000 AAVE tokens) passed a Temp Check with a narrow 52.58% approval. 

Zeller immediately challenged the result, alleging that 233,000 votes from Aave Labs-linked clusters (including 111,000 tokens delegated by co-founder Stani Kulechov) decided the outcome, and that removing those votes would have revealed a clear rejection. 

Two days later, the Aave Chan Initiative announced it was leaving the project entirely. 

What does this mean for Morpho? Morpho is now the only DeFi protocol that the Ethereum Foundation has invested in twice under its current treasury strategy. With a total value locked (TVL) of $5.8 billion, the endorsement comes at a period when Morpho is already starting to build institutional momentum. 

In less than eight months, Coinbase has surpassed $1 billion in Bitcoin-backed loan originations through the protocol. Additionally, Apollo Global Management also agreed to buy up to 90 million MORPHO tokens over four years through its partnership with the Morpho Association.

Nonetheless, the Ethereum Foundation’s policy simply highlights that aside from financial gain, the deployments themselves signal the kind of technical approaches and governance models that the foundation considers sustainable.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:40 1mo ago
XRP, Cardano Drop 5%: How Much Lower Can They Go? cryptonews
ADA XRP
XRP’s $1.2 Breakdown RiskXRP trades trapped between Supertrend resistance at $1.5890 and support near $1.20. 

All four EMAs remain bearishly stacked above price, with the 20 EMA at $1.4285, 50 at $1.5068, 100 at $1.6978, and 200 at $1.9518. Price hasn’t traded above the 200 EMA since October 2025.

Open interest sits at $2.79 billion, dramatically lower than the $10-$11 billion peak during January 2026 euphoria. 

The decline in open interest alongside falling price reflects long-side capitulation and deleveraging, not fresh short conviction.

The long-short ratio on Binance accounts stands at 2.48, with top traders leaning long at 2.78. 

This heavily one-sided positioning in a downtrend typically fuels violent flush moves when longs get squeezed. 

Liquidation data shows longs absorbed $9.02 million in losses versus $648,000 for shorts over 24 hours.

A daily close below $1.43 would likely accelerate selling toward $1.20, the prior swing low. Any recovery that fails to clear the Supertrend at $1.5890 should be treated as noise. Until $1.59 is reclaimed on a daily close, the burden of proof sits with bulls.

Cardano’s $0.22 Floor TestCardano is threatening to break beneath Fibonacci 0.382 support at $0.2773. 

Losing this level with conviction opens the door toward $0.2556, and beyond that, the psychological floor at $0.2206.

All four EMAs stack bearishly, with price trading well below the 100 EMA at $0.3433 and 200 EMA at $0.4434. 

The 20 EMA at $0.2721 is kissing current price. A decisive breakdown below confirms even short-term momentum has rolled over.

Two converging trendlines are compressing price into a tightening wedge. This structure typically resolves with a sharp move in either direction. 

A downside break aligns with the broader bearish bias. A surprise bounce could target the 0.5 Fib at $0.2948 given how coiled the setup looks.

RSI sits at 50.24, with the signal line at 46.43. RSI spiked sharply earlier in the session but has since retreated, suggesting intraday buying pressure failed to hold.

The Fed CatalystThe Federal Reserve held rates at 3.50%-3.75% as expected but raised 2026 inflation expectations to 2.7% from 2.4%. 

Bitcoin fell nearly 4% to $71,600 following the decision. The dot plot continues to show expectations for one 25-basis-point rate cut in 2026 and one more in 2027.

“The implications of developments in the Middle East for the U.S. economy are uncertain,” the Fed said, referencing the Iran war that sent oil prices near $100 per barrel.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:48 1mo ago
“Not a Security”: Shiba Inu Exec Declares Victory as SHIB Gains Key SEC Clarity cryptonews
SHIB
TL;DR SHIB has been identified in SEC-related guidance, shared by Lucie, as a digital commodity rather than a security. The report reportedly reclassified 16 major cryptocurrencies, with Shiba Inu grouped alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP and Dogecoin.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 15:54 1mo ago
USDC Inflows Surge on Ethereum as Strategic Shift Fuels ETH Momentum cryptonews
ETH USDC
TL;DR

USDC on Ethereum expands 10.13% monthly, while USDT stagnates at 1.46%. Ethereum surged 20% as USDC supply accelerated, signaling institutional repositioning. Tether redirects $20M toward Bitcoin Layer 1 infrastructure strategically. Ethereum experiences a pronounced shift in its stablecoin liquidity composition, with USDC capturing massive inflows while USDT stagnates. Over the past month, USDC on-chain expanded 10.13% compared to merely 1.46% growth for USDT, a gap nearly ten times larger pointing toward deliberate capital repositioning.

Ethereum surged 20% during the same period, a gain correlating directly with accelerating USDC supply. Synchronization between flows and price suggests something deeper than temporary rotation: large actors are reconfiguring how they deploy liquidity across the network.

🤑 BREAKING: According to our on-chain data, the 100 richest USD Coin wallets (on Ethereum) are now collectively holding $32.71B worth of $USDC. The top 6 alone now hold just over a quarter (25.6%) of the entire supply. pic.twitter.com/9JRA4gV0DU

— Santiment (@santimentfeed) March 17, 2026

The top one hundred USDC wallets on Ethereum control $32.71 billion, while the six largest wallets alone capture 25.6% of total supply. USDC now exceeds 32% market share on Ethereum, displacing USDT below 50%. USDC market capitalization jumped roughly 30%, reaching all-time highs above $80 billion since Circle’s IPO in late Q2 2025. Circle stock (CRCL) surged 120% over the past thirty days, reflecting market validation of expansion narratives.

Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade lifted transaction volume 36% year-end. Total value staked reached all-time highs of 38 million ETH, with 3% growth. Real-World Assets (RWA) on-chain increased 6% during the same window. Those fundamental metrics reinforce argument that Ethereum experiences structural change, not fleeting speculative movement.

Tether Redirects Capital Strategically Toward Bitcoin Layer 1 Infrastructure Over thirty days, Tether deployed roughly $20 million into Bitcoin Layer 1 infrastructure, a deliberate maneuver strengthening Bitcoin’s role as settlement layer. Reallocation reveals deliberate decision: Tether concentrates on Bitcoin while opening space for Circle to dominate USDC supply on Ethereum.

Circle owns direct incentives expanding USDC while Tether constructs Bitcoin positioning. USDC flows now feed directly into Ethereum on-chain activity, creating reinforcement cycle where improved liquidity attracts additional users and traders.

Ethereum finished 2025 down 29% while transaction volume climbed 36%, creating opportunity for patient arbitrage where HODLers maintaining positions through weakness now harvest gains. Accelerating USDC flows represent institutional and wholesale activity confirming Ethereum developed sufficient functional value to justify repricing.

The correlation between USDC expansion and ETH price appreciation suggests large players have shifted conviction. As on-chain activity improves and stablecoin liquidity concentrates around USDC, Ethereum positions itself for sustained appreciation driven by genuine demand rather than sentiment cycles.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:06 1mo ago
Kaspa Explodes Higher as Hard Fork Frenzy Sparks Breakout Showdown cryptonews
KAS
TL;DR:

Derivatives Surge: Kaspa’s Open Interest (OI) jumped from $9.89 million to $13.64 million in just 48 hours, reflecting a massive influx of fresh capital. Technological Catalyst: The network is preparing for a Hard Fork on May 5, which will introduce “vProgs” and programmable smart contracts to its architecture. Resistance Levels: The price is looking to consolidate above the 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), located near $0.050, to confirm a trend reversal. The crypto-asset market reacted to recent network updates, and this Wednesday, Kaspa is exploding with a 20% daily rally. This reaction is not an isolated event; it responds to a combination of bullish technical indicators and a very solid narrative.

🚀 Kaspa Hard Fork Alert: The blockDAG is leveling up! 🚀

Mark your calendars for May 5th, because Kaspa is undergoing a massive upgrade!

This hard fork introduces some game-changing features, including:

• vProgs: Opening the door for Programmable Money and a new era of… pic.twitter.com/XfosndNnUp

— Banana (@hereisbanana) March 17, 2026 Technically speaking, the jump in Open Interest to $13.64 million confirms that this was not a simple position shuffle, but rather a wave of new bullish bets. Funding rates reveal that traders are paying premiums to maintain their long positions, injecting volatile momentum into the price of KAS in the short term.

The May Hard Fork: The Engine of Bullish Sentiment May 5 is the date marked on the calendar for this speculative frenzy. The ecosystem is preparing its next update, which will allow for the deployment of programmable money and decentralized applications (dApps). This evolution transforms Kaspa from an efficient blockDAG architecture into a direct competitor in the high-performance ecosystem sector.

Consequently, the price chart shows an attempted breakout from a long-term descending wedge pattern. If the asset clears the $0.05 barrier, the next targets are set at the $0.062 and $0.074 resistance levels. However, there is a risk that the market has already “bought the rumor,” which could lead to a correction if the $0.030 support level is lost.

In summary, Kaspa is at a turning point where smart contract technology and institutional appetite for derivatives will decide whether this breakout marks the start of a new bullish trend or a trap for euphoric buyers.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:09 1mo ago
Institutional Inflows Into Bitcoin and Crypto ETFs Soar to $1,060,000,000 in One Week: CoinShares cryptonews
BTC
Investments continue to pour into crypto exchange-traded products amid the war in the Middle East, according to the digital asset manager Coinshares.

Inflows of digital asset investment products hit $1.06 billion last week, marking the third consecutive week of inflows. 

Coinshares says the amount of funds that go to crypto products during a disruptive geopolitical event reinforces digital assets, particularly Bitcoin (BTC), as a relative safe haven compared with other asset classes. 

Since the crisis in Iran started, the total assets under management (AUM) in digital asset exchange-traded products grew by $140 billion, representing an increase of 9.4%.

Investors allocated $793 million for Bitcoin, which accounts for 75% of the inflows. They also funneled $315 million to Ethereum (ETH). XRP saw outflows for the second week in a row, totalling $76 million.

The US is behind $1.02 billion, or 96%, of the inflows, followed by Canada and Switzerland, which saw inflows of $19.4 million and $10.4 million, respectively. 

Hong Kong recorded inflows of $23.1 million, the largest since August 2025, while Germany witnessed outflows of $17.1 million, its first weekly outflow in 2026.

The sustained inflows in crypto investment products come as Bitcoin and Ethereum rally. From trading below $66,000 on March 9th, Bitcoin soared to over $76,000. Ethereum also climbed to nearly $2,400 from less than $2,000 last week. 

BTC is now trading at $70,696 while ETH is changing hands for $2,173.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:11 1mo ago
Why the US-Iran conflict sent traders to Hyperliquid — and pushed HYPE into crypto's top 10 cryptonews
HYPE
Hyperliquid’s HYPE token moved into the top 10 crypto assets by market capitalization, beating Cardano's ADA amid a 1,700-fold rise in trading volume tied to oil volatility during the US-Iran conflict.

Notably, Bitcoin benefited significantly from the broader bid for crypto during the conflict, but HYPE gained a second channel as traders used Hyperliquid's platform to express views on oil around the clock, including on weekends when conventional futures venues were closed.

From March 1 to March 18, HYPE’s market value rose from about $8.16 billion to $10.66 billion, a gain of about 30.7%, according to CryptoSlate's data. Over the same stretch, the token climbed from No. 13 to No. 10 in the site’s rankings.

The move built on momentum already forming across decentralized perpetual futures markets. Hyperliquid had been gaining significant market share as traders shifted more derivatives activity on-chain and as the venue expanded its reach beyond crypto-native speculation.

The US-Iran conflict accelerated that trend by giving traders a reason to use crypto rails for real-time exposure to oil-linked volatility.

That gave HYPE a different profile from many large-cap tokens, as traders no longer priced the token solely as exposure to a fast-growing crypto venue. Instead, they were also pricing in a platform that became a live venue for macro hedging while legacy markets were offline.

Oil volatility pushes flow on-chainThe latest conflict began after US-Israeli strikes on Iran on Feb. 28, setting off a rise in oil prices and a scramble across markets to reprice supply risk.

Since then, Brent crude has settled above $100 a barrel, while analysts have tracked the possibility of further gains if shipping routes or regional energy infrastructure are disrupted.

Hyperliquid became one of the places where that view showed up in volume, as trading in oil-linked perpetual contracts on the platform expanded quickly as the war developed.

Data from Flowscan showed that cumulative oil-futures volume on Hyperliquid rose from about $339 million on Feb. 28 to more than $10 billion as of press time.

Bitwise research analyst Danny Nelson explained that the high Hyperliquid volume was a sign that traders were using the on-chain venue to hedge a commodity that still sits at the center of the global economy.

According to him, oil had been about 2.5 times more volatile during the war than in the two weeks before the conflict and pointed to the gap that forms when traditional futures venues close for the weekend while headlines continue to move.

Hyperliquid's Oil Futures (Source: Danny Nelson/X)He added:

“Wartime forces markets to adapt. Sometimes you don’t realize you need a solution until it stares you in the face. I think that’s what’s happening here with weekend hedging. Hyperliquid’s weekend oil sessions have grown 1,700x in just a month.”

Notably, Hyperliquid had confirmed the trend, saying that real-world asset trading on the venue repeatedly set records, surpassing $1.3 billion in open interest and $1.4 billion in weekend volume.

The company said the platform had become a venue for 24/7 price discovery in oil, metals, and equity indexes when standard markets were shut.

Despite this, the scale still remained small compared with legacy energy markets. Nelson noted that traditional futures venues handle about $18.5 billion in WTI contracts on an average trading day, or roughly 35 times Hyperliquid’s best weekend oil session.

Even so, the pace of Hyperliquid's growth drew attention because it suggested a market segment was being built during live geopolitical stress rather than through a slower cycle of product launches and user incentives.

Revenue structure helps explain HYPE’s rallyHYPE rose alongside that activity because Hyperliquid’s structure links platform revenue more directly to token demand than many crypto networks do.

According to Hyperliquid’s documentation, trading fees are directed to an Assistance Fund, which uses them to buy HYPE on the open market.

Tokens held in the fund are burned, reducing supply over time. Users who stake HYPE also receive fee discounts on the platform. The result is a model that allows traders to view the token more like an exchange-linked asset whose value can rise with trading volume.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

That framework became more relevant as war-driven oil trading pushed volume higher. In simple terms, more trading produced more fees, and more fees increased the amount of HYPE bought back and removed from circulation. The market had a revenue-based reason to reprice the token.

DefiLlama data showed Hyperliquid generated about $182.5 billion in perpetual futures volume over 30 days, $42.69 billion over seven days, and $6.76 billion over 24 hours.

Hyperliquid Key Metrics (Source: DeFiLlama)The platform also posted about $45.4 million in 30-day earnings, which implied roughly $554 million on an annualized basis if activity held near that level.

Considering this, Arthur Hayes, founder of BitMEX, described Hyperliquid as the largest revenue-generating crypto project outside stablecoins.

He said 97% of that revenue was being used to buy back HYPE from the market, a design he argued gave the token a stronger link to platform cash flow than many other crypto assets. According to him, Hyperliquid could continue to take derivative volume from centralized exchanges while adding new products to expand revenue.

Some of that product expansion is already underway through HIP-3, Hyperliquid’s framework for permissionless perpetual listings, which has allowed the trading of real-world assets. The trading platform is also looking to enable prediction markets and options-style derivatives as part of its array of features.

The combination of these developments, he argued, would bolster HYPE's potential to reach $150 by August next year.

A war trade becomes a market-structure testMeanwhile, the next question is whether that wartime flow turns into a standing category of demand.

The continued use of Hyperliquid for oil-linked and metals-related contracts after tensions cool would support the case that 24/7 macro trading on crypto rails can hold a larger share of activity.

However, a retreat in those volumes, once energy prices settle, would weaken the revenue assumptions that helped drive HYPE higher this month.

Meanwhile, there are also near-term risks. Token unlocks remain on the calendar, including an April 6 unlock that traders will monitor for supply pressure. At the same time, questions remain after research into Hyperliquid’s October 2025 stress event raised concerns about how the platform managed a large liquidation and the use of auto-deleveraging.

Even with those issues, the move into the top tier of crypto assets reflected a clear sequence. The US-Iran war lifted oil volatility. Oil volatility drove demand for markets that stayed open around the clock.

Hyperliquid captured part of that demand through on-chain perpetuals, and HYPE benefited because the platform’s fee structure feeds directly into token buybacks and burns.

Mentioned in this articlePosted in
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:11 1mo ago
Fed Rate Cut: Bitcoin Price Drops 5% as Federal Reserve Keeps Rates Unchanged cryptonews
BTC
Bitcoin price has fallen below $71,000 on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve left its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 3.5% to 3.75%, prompting renewed pressure across risk assets. The digital asset was down more than 5% on the day as traders reacted to a policy stance that kept borrowing costs elevated and offered little support for expectations of faster easing.

The Federal Open Market Committee voted 11-1 to hold rates steady at the end of its March meeting. Federal Reserve Governor Stephen Miran dissented and supported a 25-basis-point cut, but the broader committee remained focused on inflation that continues to run above target and a labor market that is showing slower job growth. In its policy statement, the Fed said uncertainty around the economic outlook remained elevated and referred to developments in the Middle East as a factor clouding the outlook.

Bitcoin’s decline came as investors adjusted to a policy path that still points to limited rate cuts. The central bank maintained projections for one quarter-point reduction in 2026 and one in 2027, while seven policymakers projected no cuts in 2026. The median federal funds rate projection for the end of 2026 remained at 3.4%, and the longer-run rate estimate was revised to 3.1%.

Fed Keeps Policy Tight as Inflation Stays Above TargetThe Fed’s decision was widely expected, but market attention turned to Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks after the announcement. Powell said the committee is trying to balance downside risks to the labor market with upside risks to inflation, especially as oil prices rise during the conflict involving Iran. Brent crude has climbed to about $108 a barrel, while U.S. gasoline prices have risen to $3.80 per gallon, according to the details provided during the coverage of the meeting.

Powell also addressed questions about the duration of inflation pressures. “I think we have to be humble about knowing how long it will take for tariffs to go all the way through the economy,” he said, adding that earlier inflation shocks lasted longer than expected. On the broader economy, Powell said, “The U.S. economy has really been just doing pretty well through a lot of significant challenges over the past few years.”

The central bank’s stance kept pressure on markets that are sensitive to liquidity conditions. Bitcoin has often benefited from lower rates and easier financial conditions, but the latest Fed guidance reinforced a higher-for-longer environment. That backdrop supports yields on cash and government debt, limiting near-term support for non-yielding assets such as bitcoin.

Jerome Powell Addresses Leadership QuestionsReporters also pressed Powell on his future as chair, with his term set to end on May 15. Powell said he would remain in place if a successor is not confirmed in time. “I had no intention of stepping down until the investigation is well and truly over,” he said, according to the remarks cited from the press conference. 

He also told reporters, “I’m not going to have any more to say on those issues, by the way,” when questions continued about his leadership.

The comments came as President Donald Trump has intensified criticism of Powell in recent months and named Kevin Warsh as his nominee to succeed him. Trump has repeatedly called for lower interest rates and urged the Fed to move more aggressively. At the same time, the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation tied to renovation cost overruns at the Fed’s headquarters, a matter Powell has rejected as politically motivated.

Bitcoin Reacts to “higher for longer” OutlookBitcoin’s drop reflected the market’s response to a policy stance that still points to restrictive financial conditions. Barron’s reported that Bitcoin fell 3.9% to about $71,678 after the Fed decision, while Ethereum and XRP also declined. 

That pullback followed a recent attempt by BTC to stabilize above resistance in the $74,500 to $76,600 area.

Source: X

From a chart perspective, the current move leaves traders watching whether Bitcoin can defend the higher-low structure built above the mid-$65,000 zone. A move back toward resistance would keep the $76,000 to $80,000 area in view, while failure to hold support would weaken the current recovery setup. According to crypto analyst Michael Van de Poppe, this BTC price trend  is  a short-term risk-off shift tied to the Fed and the rise in oil prices.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:15 1mo ago
Shopify's USDC Integration Shows How Platforms Could Pick Stablecoin Favorites cryptonews
USDC
Merchant friction and user confusion are two big barriers holding retail stablecoins back.

Or is it user friction and merchant confusion?

Regardless, the success of stablecoins as a payment mechanism across eCommerce is increasingly coming from platforms that are embedding crypto into mainstream commerce, all without asking anyone to care that it’s crypto.

Shopify, for example, is integrating the stablecoin USD Coin (USDC) directly into its core payments stack, allowing merchants to accept digital dollars at checkout without adding new providers or changing their workflows. The feature is embedded inside Shopify Payments, meaning merchants can turn it on alongside credit cards and other existing payment options.

A shopper can select USDC at checkout, pay from a crypto wallet, and complete the purchase much like any other transaction. On the back end, merchants can choose whether to receive funds in traditional fiat payouts or settle in USDC on-chain.

So far, the USDC stablecoin is the only token supported. Plans for future USDT (Tether) support were announced this month. But the Shopify checkout experience does allow for USDC settlement across EVM networks, including Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and Polygon.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

And the infrastructure supporting Shopify’s stablecoin payment functionality reflects a broader push toward production-grade blockchain commerce. Shopify is working with Stripe and Coinbase to enable wallet connectivity and transaction processing. Settlement occurs on Base, a Layer 2 network designed also by Coinbase to lower costs and improve transaction speed.

More here: Mastercard Moves to Normalize Crypto Inside Its Payments Ecosystem 

Shopify Made Stablecoins Invisible; That’s the Point

We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

For merchants selling internationally, payments often involve currency conversions, intermediary banks, delays and fees that erode margins. Stablecoins offer a different pathway: a shared digital dollar that can move globally without relying on traditional correspondent banking networks.

The broader implication is that stablecoins are being positioned less as an alternative payment rail and more as a native feature of digital commerce platforms. For merchants, it introduces optionality without requiring operational overhaul. For consumers, it brings crypto spending into a familiar interface. By embedding USDC into its primary payments product, Shopify is effectively normalizing crypto-denominated transactions for a global merchant base.

For the payments ecosystem at large, the development signals a shift toward hybrid models where fiat and blockchain-based settlement coexist inside the same checkout experience.

See also: Aon May Have Found Stablecoins’ First Serious Office Job

The Shopify integration designed to reduce checkout friction. A shopper can select USDC at checkout, pay from a crypto wallet, and complete the purchase much like any other transaction. On the back end, merchants can choose whether to receive funds in traditional fiat payouts or settle in USDC on-chain.

For merchants, the operational model remains familiar. USDC can be activated in settings, and businesses can continue receiving bank deposits as they do today. Those that opt into on-chain payouts can instead receive USDC directly into a crypto wallet, potentially accelerating settlement times and reducing cross-border complexity.

The move also extends into incentives. Shopify updated its USDC rewards terms in March, outlining how merchants and users may earn or receive benefits tied to holding or transacting in USDC. The updated framework covers eligibility, wallet requirements and conditions governing the use of rewards.

Still, findings in “Waiting for Certainty: Why Most CFOs Are Holding Back on Crypto and Stablecoins,” the latest installment of the PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive series, The 2026 Certainty Project, reveal that among the middle market firms surveyed that were using stablecoins and cryptocurrencies, bank-integrated solutions were the most popular.

Of the CFOs using stablecoins, just 8% did so through a payments or treasury FinTech, and 5% did so via self-custody wallets, per the report.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:19 1mo ago
Bitcoin sinks below $71,000, stocks close at session lows, as 2026 rate cut hopes fade further cryptonews
BTC
Bitcoin sinks below $71,000, stocks close at session lows, as 2026 Fed rate cut hopes fade furtherFed chair Jerome Powell said rising energy prices are feeding into the inflation outlook, but "nobody knows" yet how lasting the impact will be.Updated Mar 18, 2026, 8:21 p.m. Published Mar 18, 2026, 8:19 p.m.

Bitcoin BTC$70,954.25 slipped below $71,000 on Wednesday as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell flagged rising oil prices amid the war in Iran as a new inflation risk.

The Fed held interest rates steady as expected, but during his post-meeting press conference, Powell acknowledged that the recent surge in energy prices is already feeding into the central bank’s outlook.

"The oil shock for sure shows up" in higher inflation projections, he said, while cautioning that "nobody knows" yet how persistent the impact will be.

Policymakers raised their 2026 inflation forecast to 2.7% from 2.4%, underscoring concerns that price pressures could remain elevated longer than anticipated.

Despite that, Powell dismissed comparisons to a 1970s-style stagflation, even as the central bank faces growing tension between slowing growth and sticky inflation.

"That’s not the case right now," he said, noting that unemployment remains near long-run norms while inflation is only modestly above target. "I would reserve the term stagflation for a much more serious set of circumstances."

"What we have is some tension between the goals, and we’re trying to manage our way through it," he added.

Cautious marketsAlready under pressure prior to the Fed news on poor February inflation data and no sign the war in Iran is letting up, markets fell further late in the session.

Bitcoin (BTC) price on Wednesday after FOMC (CoinDesk)Bitcoin BTC$70,954.25 late Wednesday afternoon had pulled all the way back to $70,900, down almost 5% over the past 24 hours. Ether (ETH) was sporting a 6.5% decline.

The S&P 500 and Nasdaq closed at the day's lows, down 1.4% and 1.5%, respectively. Gold extended its decline below $4,850 an ounce, now 3.1% lower on the day at its weakest price in more than a month.

Digital asset-related stocks remained sharply lower, following crypto prices. Strategy (MSTR), the largest corporate BTC holder, and Bitmine (BMNR), the leading Ethereum treasury firm, were 5%-6% lower. Investment firm Galaxy (GLXY) declined almost 7%, while crypto exchange Gemini (GEMI) tumbled 15% to about its lowest level since it went public last year.

More For You

Federal Reserve holds policy steady as Iran war adds to growth and inflation concerns

2 hours ago

Bitcoin remained sharply lower for the session following the expected decision by the U.S. central bank.

What to know:

As expected, the Federal Reserve left its benchmark fed funds rate range unchanged at 3.50%-3.75%.Bitcoin remained sharply lower on the session, trading at $71,600.Chairman Jerome Powell's post-meeting press conference begins at 2:30 PM ET.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:19 1mo ago
Can Solana (SOL) Reach $115 If Key Support Holds? cryptonews
SOL
TL;DR

SOL was trading around $93, and the bullish setup depends on strong demand below $90 continuing to absorb supply rather than breaking down. Glassnode URPD data showed roughly 76 million SOL accumulated between $82.6 and $85.55, creating a dense local support zone worth over $6 billion. Analysts see a path toward $100 and potentially $115, but only if recent accumulation holds and bullish momentum avoids another sharp reversal from here. Solana is trying to turn a fragile rebound into something more decisive, and the market’s focus has narrowed to one support zone that now carries the entire bullish case. SOL is trading around $90 at the time, with buyers attempting to stabilize price after months of uneven spot performance. The argument for upside is simple but highly conditional: if support below $90 keeps absorbing supply, bulls may have a clear path toward retesting $100 and potentially stretching to $115. That setup has turned one local price floor into the market’s key battlefield.

Solana $SOL is breaking out with little resistance ahead!

On-chain data reveals a robust demand floor established between $85.55 and $82.60, where 76 million tokens were transacted. This 38-day accumulation phase has effectively exhausted sell-side liquidity.

With no… pic.twitter.com/hsQUO4H5uh

— Ali Charts (@alicharts) March 17, 2026

Support below $90 is now doing the heavy lifting What gives that view technical weight is the concentration of heavy accumulation just beneath current price, which is now acting like a shock absorber for further selling. The analysis cited by Ali Charts relies on Glassnode’s URPD data, which maps where tokens last moved on-chain. Between $82.6 and $85.55, roughly 76 million SOL changed hands, representing more than $6 billion in accumulated value. That cluster suggests a dense ownership base in the lower range, reinforcing the idea that demand has been strongest exactly where bulls most need it.

The bullish case also rests on the claim that Solana has already passed through a 38-day accumulation phase that exhausted sellers and left the next resistance band thinner than the support beneath it. In that framing, the route toward $100 is less crowded than the zone below $90, which is why some traders believe a break higher could accelerate quickly. Even so, the setup is not free of doubt. The article also notes skepticism from market participants who argue that strong bullish confidence in recent months has repeatedly been followed by sharp reversals.

That tension is why the move toward $115 is being treated less as a prediction and more as a conditional path that depends on buyers defending support and reclaiming momentum fast enough. The first task is not $115 itself, but a sustained push through $100 that converts resistance into a fresh support shelf. If that level holds, the market could begin treating higher prices as structurally justified rather than merely reactive. If support below $90 fails, however, the thesis weakens sharply and the upside case starts to unravel before it fully forms, for now in a market still short on unquestioned conviction overall.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:26 1mo ago
Crypto market sheds $100 billion as bitcoin price drops 5% amid Fed caution cryptonews
BTC
The sell-off extended beyond crypto as investors reassessed the macro outlook following the Fed's latest guidance.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:30 1mo ago
Bitcoin Monthly Timeframe Signals A Potential Market Shift cryptonews
BTC
Bitcoin is starting to show intriguing signals on the monthly time frame, with long-term data hinting at a potential shift in market structure. While short-term price action often captures attention, it is the higher-time-frame trends that typically define the broader market direction, and those signals are now starting to align in a way that looks increasingly significant.

What The Monthly Candles Reveal About Market Direction The latest price action of Bitcoin suggests that the monthly low may already be in, with time-based statistics pointing to a strong probability of higher prices ahead. Market analyst Lennaert Snyder highlighted on X that, based on the past 10 years of BTC data, approximately 97.7% of monthly highs and lows are formed within the first 15 days of the month, suggesting the recent low is likely to hold for the rest of the month.

Snyder noted that around 80.7% of months go on to print a new P2 (Point 2) after the 17th day, based on the timing. These time-based statistics suggest that there is a higher chance that the BTC price will experience upward momentum this month.

How Market Structure Holds While Timing Models Shift Bitcoin is showing a subtle shift in behavior as price has broken away from the established 14th pattern for the first time in the past 7 months, causing the market algorithms to shift over time. A crypto trader known as Killa on X claimed that it was possible to capitalize on all 5 occurrences of this setup during that period.

However, the current deviation represents only a single pivot from a time-based price structure, which on its own is not enough to invalidate the larger thesis. This simply alters how the price reacts around that specific pivot rather than changing the overall trend structure of the market.

Source: Chart from Killa on X Killa emphasized that in this case, pivot helps identify periods where directional volatility is likely to increase, and this consistent pattern over the past 7 months has produced 5 high-quality opportunities. It is important to distinguish between time-based pivots and price structure. While pivots can fail or lose reliability over time, the underlying structural price behavior will ultimately remain a driver of the market direction.

Looking ahead, attention is shifting to macro catalysts as the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting is approaching, and much of the narrative has already been priced in. Institutional players are already positioning ahead of the event. Currently, the price has pushed higher into it, and the recent Consumer Price Index (CPI) data did not produce a local up, leaving open the possibility that the upcoming FOMC decision could act as the next inflection point.

BTC trading at $73,940 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:30 1mo ago
XRP Price Prediction: Goldman Sachs Quietly Built a $154 Million XRP ETF Position — Why Is the Price Still Stuck? cryptonews
XRP
Altcoin News

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Ahmed Balaha

Author

Ahmed Balaha

Part of the Team Since

Aug 2025

About Author

Ahmed Balaha is a journalist and copywriter based in Georgia with a growing focus on blockchain technology, DeFi, AI, privacy, digital assets, and fintech innovation.

Has Also Written

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Last updated: 

1 minute ago

Goldman Sachs has quietly built a $154 million position in spot XRP ETF shares fueling bullish price prediction.

Bloomberg data confirmed it. The top 30 holders of spot XRP ETFs controlled roughly $211 million by end of 2025. Goldman accounts for the lion’s share of that.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst James Seyffart broke down the numbers on Tuesday. Institutional conviction is clearly there.

🚨 BREAKING: GOLDMAN SACHS EMERGES AS TOP XRP ETF HOLDER!

Wall Street giant @GoldmanSachs now the biggest disclosed holder of spot $XRP ETFs with $153M exposure according to fresh 13F filings.

Analysts report a wave of institutional “super fans” piling in as XRP ETFs hold… pic.twitter.com/WUBcy427TR

— BSCN (@BSCNews) March 10, 2026 But the price is not reflecting it yet. XRP is trading at $1.29, stuck in a tight descending channel and struggling to reclaim $1.50. Volatility is contracting hard.

XRP Price Prediction: Can XRP Price Break $1.50 Resistance Now?XRP broke above $1.50, tapped $1.61, got rejected, and pulled back to sit right on top of the breakout level.

This retest is everything.

Source: XRPUSD / TradingViewThe symmetrical triangle breakout from last week stays intact as long as $1.50 holds. The repeated cup formations along the bottom trendline throughout the consolidation show genuine demand underneath. Buyers have defended this zone multiple times.

The path from here is clean. Hold $1.50 on this retest and price builds another push toward $1.61, then $1.90, then $2.20 above that. Fail to hold it and price slides back inside the triangle. The bearish path toward $1.30 and $1.12 becomes the active scenario.

The $1.61 rejection was sharp. Real supply is sitting there. The next attempt needs more momentum behind it than the first touch to clear it properly.

But the overall structure is still bullish. Weeks of accumulation, a clean triangle breakout, a retest of the breakout level, all while holding above $1.50 for the first time since mid-February.

Setup is intact. The next few candles decide it.

Maxi Doge Targets Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key LevelsXRP is backed by Goldman Sachs and built for institutional money. That stability comes with a trade-off. Moving a $70 billion asset requires billions in fresh inflow just to needle the price.

Traders hunting velocity are rotating into something different.

Maxi Doge has raised $4,684,851.94 in its presale. Current price is $0.0002809. The pitch is simple and loud. A 240-lb gym-bro canine juggernaut built around the 1000x leverage mentality. Bold branding, holder-only trading competitions, and a Maxi Fund treasury designed to sustain liquidity after launch.

Early Pepe buyers know exactly what this entry point represents. Maximum spread between presale valuation and public listing price is where life-changing returns get made.

The market is bored of sideways consolidation. $MAXI is positioning itself as the antidote.

Are you lifting heavy or holding bags?

Visit the Official Maxi Doge Website Here
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:34 1mo ago
After 9 Months of Planning, Venus Protocol Hacker Loses $4.7M in Stunning Reversal cryptonews
XVS
TL;DR

Venus attacker lost $4.7M on-chain despite orchestrating a sophisticated nine-month accumulation. Venus accumulated $2.1M in bad debt after collateral liquidations in thin markets. Protocol ignored oracle manipulation warnings from 2023 audit, enabling exploit. BlockSec audit revealed far more complex reality than initial reports about Sunday’s Venus Protocol attack: the hacker did not profit but instead lost roughly $4.7 million in on-chain operations. While media outlets reported a $3.7 million theft, deeper analysis showed both the protocol and attacker ended up losing capital, with Venus accumulating $2.1 million in unrecoverable bad debt after collateral liquidations in thin liquidity markets.

The hacker accumulated Thena’s THE token over nine months, funding purchases through Tornado Cash to obscure traceability. Once substantial quantities accumulated, the attacker exceeded Venus’ permitted THE supply cap, manipulated the value of THE used as collateral, and borrowed assets worth nearly $15 million against inflated guarantees.

254 bots, 8,048 liquidation txs, still $2.15M in bad debt. The attacker lost ~$4.7M on-chain. Both sides lost money.

— BlockSec Phalcon (@Phalcon_xyz) March 18, 2026

However, when automated liquidators began selling THE in response, value collapsed. The attacker invested $9.92 million but retained only $5.2 million after all liquidations, generating net on-chain loss of $4.7 million.

BlockSec suggests genuine profits likely came from off-chain positions, possibly centralized exchange accounts where massive THE selling triggered short bets. One security researcher reported $15,000 in gains shorting THE while tracking the exploit. Exterior operations explain how the hacker obtained profitability despite on-chain loss, suggesting more sophisticated coordination than initially assumed.

Venus Accumulates Troubling History Years After Launch Venus Protocol, the largest lending platform on BNB Chain with $1.45 billion in total value locked, has faced a disturbing series of attacks and exploits since launching in 2020. The attack vector used in the recent exploit—oracle manipulation—was identified in a 2023 Code4rena audit but dismissed as “having no negative side effects,” an analytical error allowing vulnerability to persist for years.

In 2021, volatility of native token XVS drove $200 million in liquidations and $90 million in bad debt. When LUNA collapsed in 2022, Venus accrued $14 million in bad debt when a Chainlink price feed for LUNA bottomed out. One year later, an undetected oracle manipulation attack generated $900,000 in debt. In 2023, the protocol braced for $150 million in BNB liquidation derived from earlier BNB bridge hack.

In recent September, an alleged $27 million attack turned out to be a user falling for phishing scam. After Venus paused operations, the user’s position faced liquidation to recover stolen funds. Pattern emerges where Venus repeatedly experiences stress while successive attacks expose layers of fragility. 

As DeFi platforms mature, Venus must strengthen risk governance and security auditing to prevent future exploits converting user gains into systemic losses. The recurring nature of Venus exploits raises questions about whether the protocol can maintain user confidence and capital preservation given its deteriorating security record.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:38 1mo ago
Brandt Spotlights 'Ugly' Bitcoin Pattern cryptonews
BTC
Veteran trader and classical chartist Peter Brandt has urged Bitcoin maximalists to stop exhibiting dogmatic behavior. 

In his latest market commentary, Brandt noted that there are two heavily conflicting technical setups for Bitcoin (BTC), pointing out an "ugly" flag pattern that could spell trouble, alongside a more optimistic "horn" formation.

Brandt has come up with both bullish and bearish scenarios to remind the market that professional trading requires flexibility.

HOT Stories

"Cryptocultists"Brandt didn't hold back his criticism of the cryptocurrency community's one-directional bullishness.

"I am well aware that you cryptocultists cannot stand the idea of traders being flexible and not totally dogmatic like you," Brandt stated on X.

He has stressed that seasoned traders do not marry a single narrative; instead, they analyze the charts as they develop and prepare for multiple potential outcomes.

Two setups When it comes to Bitcoin's current price action, Brandt noted that the asset is "set up for me in two ways."

Comment on Bitcoin
I am well aware that you cryptocultists cannot stand the idea of traders being flexible and not totally dogmatic like you, but Bitcoin is set up for me in two ways.
The horn is constructive
The flag is ugly
Take your pick
Opinions are a dime a dozen $BTC pic.twitter.com/ORFbiI5yo3

— Peter Brandt (@PeterLBrandt) March 18, 2026 On the bullish side of the ledger, Brandt pointed to a pattern he described as a "constructive" horn.

Based on the charts provided in his analysis, this structure resembles a rounding bottom or a broad, upward-curving base following a period of downward price action. 

A "horn" bottom can indicate that selling pressure has been exhausted/ If this pattern plays out, it could serve as a launchpad for a sustained bullish reversal.

Conversely, Brandt drew attention to a second, far more pessimistic pattern.

You Might Also Like

Looking at the alternative chart, Bitcoin appears to be consolidating in an upward-sloping channel immediately following a sharp drop. In technical analysis, this is known as a "bear flag," which is known as a notorious continuation pattern. If Bitcoin fails to break out to the upside and instead falls through the bottom support line of this flag, it typically triggers another aggressive leg down.

"Opinons are a dime a dozen"Ultimately, Brandt declined to guarantee which way the market will break, leaving the interpretation up to individual traders.

"Take your pick," he concluded. "Opinions are a dime a dozen." The overarching message is clear: in a market currently battling sticky inflation, cautious Federal Reserve policy, and shifting technicals, flexibility and risk management are far more valuable than rigid devotion to a single price target.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:39 1mo ago
Bitcoin Price Fights For $70,000 As Federal Reserve Holds Rates cryptonews
BTC
The Federal Reserve on Wednesday kept its benchmark interest rate steady, maintaining the federal funds target range at 3.50% to 3.75%. Bitcoin price is fighting to hold $70,000 amid a complex backdrop of elevated inflation, slowing job growth, and war in the Middle East. 

The decision marked the second consecutive FOMC meeting with no change in borrowing costs and followed a pause that began after three rate cuts last year.

Bitcoin price responded to the announcement with a drop in trading, changing hands around $70,500, down 3.6% over the previous 24 hours, according to Bitcoin Magazine Pro. The cryptocurrency had flirted with $76,000 last week, reaching its highest level in over a month, but has since retraced as investors weighed inflation data and global uncertainties.

Voting members of the Federal Open Market Committee were split for a sixth consecutive policy meeting. Eleven supported holding rates steady, while Fed Governor Stephen Miran dissented, advocating a 25-basis-point cut. 

In its statement, the FOMC noted that “inflation remains somewhat elevated” and that job gains have remained low, even as the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.4% in February. The Fed emphasized a data-dependent approach to future adjustments, signaling that any decision will rely on incoming economic information.

The backdrop for the Fed’s policy deliberations included the ongoing war involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran, which has pushed energy prices higher. On Wednesday, Bitcoin price fell in tandem with U.S. stocks following reports that Israel struck the South Pars gas field in Iran.

“Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated,” the FOMC said. “The implications of developments in the Middle East for the U.S. economy are uncertain.”

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell discussed the implications of rising energy prices at a press conference. 

He said, “Near term measures of inflation expectations have risen in recent weeks, likely reflecting the substantial rise in oil prices caused by the supply disruptions in the Middle East.” 

He added that it is “too soon to know” the full economic impact of the conflict and that policymakers would continue to monitor data closely.

Bitcoin price reacts to tariffs, rate expectations Powell also highlighted the influence of tariffs on consumer prices, noting that “some big chunk of that, between a half and three-quarters, is actually tariffs.” 

He described the current federal funds rate range as within neutral territory and emphasized the importance of central bank independence. 

“Independence is what allows us to do our jobs, and stable prices is half of our mandate, it’s one of our two mandates – maximum employment being the other,” he said.

Bitcoin price markets have historically been sensitive to interest rate expectations, as lower rates tend to make cryptocurrencies more attractive relative to traditional assets. 

Analysts suggest that the combination of higher energy costs, persistent inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty has prompted investors to reduce exposure to riskier assets, including Bitcoin.

Oil prices continued to climb Wednesday, with Brent crude rising 3.8% to $107.38 per barrel following the attack on the South Pars field. 

Despite the recent pullback, Bitcoin price remains above $70,000 for now and has recorded gains of 1.6% over the past week. Traders are watching closely for any signs from Powell or the Fed that could influence future monetary policy.

Powell’s term as Fed Chair will conclude in May, with former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh expected to succeed him if confirmed. Powell’s future on the Board of Governors remains undecided. 

He said, “I have no intention of leaving the board until the investigation is well and truly over, with transparency and finality.”

At the time of writing, the bitcoin price is slightly above $71,000.

Micah Zimmerman

Micah first discovered Bitcoin in 2018 but remained a skeptic on the sidelines for too long. Since 2021, he has covered crypto and business and now works as a news reporter for Bitcoin Magazine, based in North Carolina.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:45 1mo ago
The $93 Floor: Why SOL's Latest Breakout Could Trigger a Massive Short Squeeze cryptonews
SOL
SOL spent weeks pinned between $80 and $87, with tightening Bollinger Bands signaling that a sharp move was coming either way.

Solana’s SOL token jumped past a key technical resistance level at about $93, turning what analysts called a “39-day distribution zone” into a structural floor.

The move has brought two price targets into focus, one being an initial level near $103 and a secondary one near $113.

Breakout Above $93 Shifts Sentiment In a March 18 post on X, chartist Ali Martinez wrote that SOL’s return above the $93 level had turned a zone previously dominated by sellers into a potential base for further gains.

According to him, the setup has put a short squeeze in motion, meaning those who had bet on lower prices could be forced to buy back their positions, with the price moving against them, which could potentially speed up the rally.

“Solana just reclaimed $93.14, flipping a 39-day distribution zone into a structural floor,” Martinez explained. “If this level holds, a bull rally could happen much faster than people think.”

The breakout fits with other technical signals on longer timeframes, including a recurring pattern on Solana’s weekly chart of back-to-back candles with long lower wicks highlighted by analyst WebTrend.

According to them, the pattern has previously come before major rallies, with the first being in 2023, where it led to a 1,604% gain, and the second occurrence happening in 2025, leading to a 142% move upwards.

Fellow market watcher Bluntz also pointed to a completed accumulation phase following the daily breakout, suggesting that if the prices stay above the mid-$90 range, it could confirm a broader trend reversal.

You may also like: Bitcoin to $16 Trillion? ARK Says BTC Could Eat 70% of the Entire Crypto Market ETH, XRP, and Meme Coins Shine as Retail Sentiment Reacts to Short-Term Catalysts Ethereum and Solana ETFs Record Historic Trading Volumes in Early 2026 Although SOL indeed broke through $93 earlier today to tap $95, it has lost some traction since then and now sits below $90. It has jumped by 7% monthly, but it was still down nearly 25% over the last year. It remains more than 67% below its all-time high of nearly $293, reached about a year ago.

Improving Market Structure, But Confirmation Still in Progress The current setup is coming off the back of a period of compressed volatility, with Solana previously trading between $80 and $87 as tightening Bollinger Bands pointed to an imminent breakout. At the time, analysts couldn’t decide on the asset’s next direction, with some predicting a move higher and others, like DrBullZeus, claiming SOL could even drop to the $50 level.

Traders could look at ETF data for further context, with figures from SoSoValue showing that as of March 17, there had been almost $1 billion in net inflows into Solana-linked spot products. Furthermore, daily inflows have turned positive again after a brief period of negative movement earlier in the month.

Tags:
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 16:48 1mo ago
Bitcoin Bull Run Delayed? Top Critic Says $80K Is the True Trigger cryptonews
BTC
TL;DR

Bitcoin trades near $70,808 after a 4.87% drop in the last 24 hours, reflecting short-term pressure despite a broader upward structure. Analyst Charles Edwards states that a sustained move above $80,000 is needed to confirm a full bull run. His model focuses on institutional cost bases, suggesting that once BTC breaks this level, large investors move into profit, reducing sell pressure and supporting stronger upward continuation.
Bitcoin trades around $70,808 following a 4.87% decline over the past 24 hours, showing continued volatility across the crypto market. Despite this pullback, broader indicators still point to a constructive trend as institutional positioning plays a growing role in defining price direction.

Bitcoin Bull Run Trigger Level Explained According to Charles Edwards, the $80,000 level represents a structural threshold rather than a simple psychological barrier. His analysis is based on the Institutional Closed Basis indicator, which estimates the average acquisition price of Bitcoin held by large funds and public companies.

Clear $80s and the bull market is back pic.twitter.com/XyAB1QpqSl

— Charles Edwards (@caprioleio) March 18, 2026

This metric shows that the upper band, near $81,487, acts as a key zone where most institutional players shift into profit. As long as Bitcoin remains below that range, a portion of large holders stays near breakeven or at a slight loss, which can limit aggressive buying behavior.

A sustained breakout above $80,000 would change market dynamics. Once institutions enter profit territory, sell pressure may decline while demand strengthens. Historically, this transition has marked the shift from accumulation phases to expansion periods in previous cycles.

Institutional Positioning And Market Structure Outlook Even with the recent decline, Bitcoin continues to show resilience compared to earlier stages of past cycles. Institutional participation has expanded, particularly after the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States, introducing consistent capital inflows.

Edwards highlights that clearing the $80,000 level could open the door to a price discovery phase, where previous resistance zones lose relevance. In this environment, liquidity can accelerate upward movements as fewer sellers remain at higher levels.

He also maintains a long-term perspective on potential risks linked to quantum computing. While still debated, Edwards suggests that advancements in this field could challenge current cryptographic systems by 2028, making ongoing network development important.

Bitcoin remains below the key threshold, but the broader structure indicates that momentum is still present. A move above $80,000 could quickly shift sentiment and reinforce the conditions needed for a more sustained upward trend.
2026-03-18 21:03 1mo ago
2026-03-18 17:00 1mo ago
Algorand Foundation Cuts 25% of Staff as Crypto Industry Layoffs Grow cryptonews
ALGO
In brief The Algorand Foundation laid off 25% of its staff due to the downturn in crypto markets. The foundation remains focused on the network, which saw nearly a 5% growth in transactions last quarter compared to Q3. The layoffs follow other recent announcements from firms like OP Labs, PIP Labs, Block, and Gemini. The organization behind the layer-1 network Algorand has laid off 25% of its staff as a result of crypto’s continued slide and macroeconomic uncertainty. 

Details about how many individuals were affected were not shared. A representative for the foundation did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment. 

“These employees have been best-in-class contributors to this ecosystem and to the Foundation, and this was an incredibly tough decision,” the organization posted on X. 

“We believe that we now have a more sustainable alignment of Algorand Foundation resources with the protocol’s long-term business, technology, and ecosystem priorities,” it added.

Today, the Algorand Foundation made the difficult decision to reduce our workforce by 25%. This decision was not taken lightly and is in response to the uncertain global macro environment as well as the broader downturn in crypto markets.

These employees have been best-in-class…

— Algorand Foundation (@AlgoFoundation) March 18, 2026

The proof-of-stake network was designed by Turing Award-winning cryptography expert Silvio Micali and launched in 2019, but it has struggled to maintain prominence in the crypto world while its native token—ALGO—trades nearly 98% off its 2019 all-time high of $3.56. 

Recently changing hands at $0.09, the token last traded above $1.00 in January 2022, according to data from CoinGecko. 

Nevertheless, the foundation is still “fully focused on our mission of financial empowerment and the continued development and growth of the Algorand protocol, network, and ecosystem,” its announcement says. 

The network’s Q4 transparency report indicates quarterly transaction growth of 4.7% while real-world asset (RWA) values jumped to $109 million on the blockchain, a jump of 2.9%. 

Current data from RWA.xyz, a real-world asset analytics platform, currently ranks the network 19th overall among blockchains in terms of RWA values, at $83 million—about 190x below the value of RWAs on Ethereum. 

The firm’s layoff decision adds to a string of recent headcount reductions in the crypto industry. Last week, OP Labs—the team behind Ethereum layer-2 network Optimism—announced it was letting go 20 employees in a bid to narrow its focus. A day later, PIP Labs, the team behind Story Protocol, announced it had parted with 10% of its workforce. 

Those decisions followed a larger cut from publicly traded crypto exchange Gemini, which laid off around 25% of its staff as it embraced efficiency gains from artificial intelligence. The firm later parted with three executives as well. And Jack Dorsey’s payments firm Block laid off 4,000 employees in February, though it’s unclear how many of those were focused on the firm’s various Bitcoin initiatives.

Despite the layoffs, the Algorand Foundation’s website still maintains two job postings for roles in community management and business development.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.