Market Signal Briefing

Looking ahead, XRP’s trajectory could be shaped as much by continued institutional adoption on the XRPL as by market sentiment.

Summary

XRP has broken out of a descending trendline within a falling wedge pattern on the 4-hour chart—a bullish reversal signal. Tokenized assets and stablecoins on XRPL have surpassed $1 billion, signaling its transition from a crypto-native network to institutional-grade financial infrastructure. XRPL’s scalability, low costs, and quantum-resistant security are attracting financial institutions to the platform. XRP (XRP) hit a monthly low of $1.81, down from $2.39 on Jan. 6 and nearly 48.4% below its July all-time high, amid broader market pressures including U.S. tariff tensions, potential government shutdown concerns, delays to the crypto market structure bill, and expectations of hawkish Fed policy.

Despite this, signs of institutional support remain steady: stablecoin holdings on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) have risen $100 million this month to $407 million, XRP ETFs have netted $67.8 million in inflows, and exchange outflows indicate investors are moving XRP to private wallets.

Technically, XRP has broken out of a descending trendline within a falling wedge pattern on the 4-hour chart—a bullish reversal signal. If momentum holds, XRP could rally toward $2.23, with potential to revisit the January high of $2.39, though a drop below the $1.80 support level would invalidate this outlook.

Meanwhile, adoption of the XRP Ledger is hitting key milestones. On-chain tokenized assets and stablecoins on XRPL have surpassed $1 billion, signaling its transition from a crypto-native network to institutional-grade financial infrastructure.

Growth has been led by Ripple’s fully backed stablecoin RLUSD, now listed on Binance, alongside expanding tokenized funds, U.S. Treasuries, and credit products.

XRPL now hosts over $150 million in tokenized U.S. Treasury debt, a 2,900% increase from a year ago, highlighting the network’s growing role in real-world asset tokenization.

While still a small share of the broader tokenized Treasury market, XRPL’s scalability, low costs, and quantum-resistant security are attracting financial institutions to the platform.

Together, these trends suggest that while XRP’s price remains volatile, the underlying Ledger adoption and institutional activity provide potential long-term support for the cryptocurrency.

3 mins mins

Key Points:

Coinbase integrates Solana blockchain for trading in USA and Brazil.Increased liquidity and user engagement anticipated in Solana’s ecosystem.Despite price rise, SOL shows negative performance trends over 60- and 90-day periods. Coinbase has completed its integration with the Solana blockchain, allowing users in the U.S. and Brazil to trade millions of Solana tokens via the Jupiter Exchange within the app.

This integration deepens Coinbase’s support for DeFi access globally and enhances liquidity in the Solana ecosystem, although no major market reaction has been observed yet.

Coinbase Expands Solana Support to Users in Two Major Markets Coinbase’s integration with the Solana blockchain marks a notable extension of its platform capabilities by allowing the trading of Solana tokens through Jupiter Exchange. This move is aligned with Coinbase’s ongoing efforts to increase accessibility and user interaction with emerging blockchain technologies. Users in the U.S. and Brazil can now bypass conventional listing processes for certain tokens, thereby streamlining their participation in decentralized finance markets.

Market impact includes increased liquidity in the Solana ecosystem. By supporting these trades without geographic restrictions in regions like the United States (excluding New York) and Brazil, the platform encourages greater engagement with Solana’s network. Enhanced liquidity with Jupiter Exchange facilitates more efficient and varied token trading on the Coinbase platform. Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, stated, “millions of Base and Solana tokens can now be traded on Coinbase without waiting for a listing.”

Solana’s Liquidity Surge: Impact and Industry Reactions Did you know? The Solana blockchain reported a 300% annual growth in DEX volume, reflecting significant token innovation acceleration ahead of Coinbase’s latest integration.

As of January 26, 2026, Solana (SOL) is priced at $123.50 with a market cap of $69.90 billion, indicating a 1.13% price rise in 24 hours. Despite a 134.54% increase in trading volume, Solana’s 60- and 90-day performance shows negative trends at -13.01% and -38.37%, respectively. Data sourced from CoinMarketCap illuminates SOL’s fluctuating performance in recent months.

Solana(SOL), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 17:38 UTC on January 26, 2026. Source: CoinMarketCap Coincu research highlights potential benefits of this integration, underscoring more efficient token trading and user engagement. Regulatory outcomes remain uncertain, but technological advancements in blockchain interoperability are anticipated to further reshape the ecosystem. This integration could serve as a benchmark for other exchanges eyeing blockchain scalability enhancements.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

Representation of Tether stablecoin cryptocurrency in this illustration taken September 10, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

LONDON, Jan 26 (Reuters) - Tether, issuer of the world's largest stablecoin, added about 27 metric tons of gold to its fund exposure in the fourth quarter of 2025, it said on Monday, broadly unchanged from its third-quarter purchases estimated by analysts at 26 tons.

Gold's 18% rise year-to-date on top of 64% growth in 2025 has seen it break through key psychological resistance levels at $3,000 per ounce in March, $4,000 in October and $5,000 on Monday due to strong investment, central-bank and retail demand amid mounting global tensions.

Sign up here.

As spot gold prices have rallied, the crypto company has become a significant source of gold demand due to the high speed of purchases it has reported for reserves backing the Tether USDT stablecoin, a digital dollar with $187 billion worth of tokens in circulation, and the Tether XAUT gold token, worth $2.7 billion.

Each Tether-issued dollar token is intended to represent one U.S. dollar held in reserve. When a user provides Tether with a dollar, the company issues one USDT and holds assets of equivalent value, such as the U.S. Treasury bills. Those reserves are meant to ensure that USDT can be redeemed for dollars if need be. Tether XAUT stablecoin is fully backed by gold.

"We are operating at a scale that now places the Tether Gold Investment Fund alongside sovereign gold holders, and that carries real responsibility," said Paolo Ardoino, Tether CEO, in Tether's statement.

For comparison, Poland's central bank, the most active buyer among central banks reporting their purchases, raised its total reserves by 35 tons in the fourth quarter to 550 tons.

Tether did not say how much gold it held stored in Switzerland for the two products in total.

For the Tether gold token, XAUT, accounting for 60% of the global gold-backed stablecoin supply, Tether held 16.2 tons of gold to back it up as of the end of December.

Its third-quarter audit of reserves for Tether dollar stablecoin, USDT, the latest publicly available, showed stocks of gold worth $12.9 billion as of the end of September, which would be equal to about 104 tons of gold at the market price at that time.

The reserves backing Tether USDT were dominated by the U.S. Treasuries with gold representing only 7% as of the end-September.

Reporting by Polina Devitt; Editing by Nia Williams

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

This follows VanEck’s prior BNB proposal and signals accelerating institutional push into altcoins amid clearer U.S. regs.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: January 26, 2026 │ 5:42 PM GMT

Grayscale is widening its ETF ambitions beyond bitcoin and ether, filing paperwork with US regulators to launch products tied to Binance’s BNB and the NEAR Protocol token.

Sponsored

In separate moves flagged across recent disclosures, the asset manager filed an S-1 registration statement for a BNB ETF with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and also submitted an S-1 to convert its Grayscale Near Trust into a spot NEAR ETF.

Here’s What Grayscale Is Trying To Do The BNB filing would put Grayscale alongside VanEck, which has also sought to bring a spot BNB ETF to market. The BNB product, if approved, would give US investors regulated exposure to a token closely associated with Binance’s ecosystem.

For NEAR, Grayscale’s approach is more familiar: converting an existing trust wrapper into an ETF structure. Coverage of the filing noted NEAR’s price ticked up by more than 3% even as the broader crypto market was under pressure, though moves around single-asset filings can be noisy and short-lived.

Why This Matters In The Broader ETF Race These filings underscore how quickly the “crypto ETF” label is expanding from the first wave of spot bitcoin and spot ether products into a long tail of altcoins. For issuers, the logic is straightforward: meet demand for diversified or thematic exposure, and capture fees while distribution channels remain hungry for new listings.

Guess who just filed to launch a spot ETF for $NEAR protocol, Grayscale has taken the huge step

The aim is to bring the token to mainstream investors

Honestly if this happens, it will definitely revolutionize NEAR’s entire ecosystem pic.twitter.com/uav0LFCPWg

— Fury (@FuryMetaa) January 24, 2026 Still, the jump from BTC and ETH into assets like BNB and NEAR brings different questions to the fore, including liquidity under stress, concentration of ecosystem risk, and how regulators view the underlying markets. Grayscale’s BNB effort also lands in a space where the token’s identity is tightly interwoven with a single, dominant exchange brand.

What ETF Fans Should Look Out For Next The filings themselves don’t set an approval timeline. The immediate tell will be whether the SEC engages quickly on structure and disclosures, and whether other issuers pile in with copycat applications.

For crypto investors, the significance is less about a single listing and more about direction: the ETF pipeline is moving down the risk curve. If these products advance, they could open fresh inflow channels for select large-cap altcoins—but they also raise the odds that regulatory, market-structure, or issuer-specific setbacks hit prices with little warning.

Stay in the loop with DailyCoin’s hottest crypto news today:
Tezos Activates Tallinn Upgrade, Slashing Block Time to 6 Seconds
Dollar Drops, Yen Surges: Investors Seek Alternatives to Fiat

People Also Ask: What did Grayscale just file for?

Grayscale submitted Form S-1 to the SEC on January 23, 2026, to launch a spot ETF tracking BNB (Binance Coin). The Grayscale BNB Trust would hold actual BNB tokens and aim to mirror its price performance.

Why is this a big deal for BNB?

It opens U.S. institutional and retail access to BNB via traditional brokerage accounts. As BNB ranks among top assets by market cap, an approved ETF could boost liquidity & legitimacy following BTC/ETH spot ETF success.

What’s next for the BNB ETF?

SEC review process begins—could take months with potential 19b-4/ S-1 approvals. If greenlit, shares trade on Nasdaq in blocks of 10,000. Watch for public comments, amendments, or competing filings.

Any risks or hurdles?

Regulatory delays, SEC scrutiny on Binance ties, market volatility, or competition from other issuers. Approval isn’t guaranteed—past alt-ETFs faced push-back on multiple occasions.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

In brief MEXC and ether.fi have teamed up to launch a crypto credit card that can be used at more than 150 million Visa merchants around the world. The card offers customers up to 4% cashback on purchases, plus perks including travel discounts and conference passes. The MEXC x ether.fi card is “objectively a much better product for people,” ether.fi CEO Mike Silagadze said. MEXC and ether.fi have teamed up to launch a new crypto-powered credit card that aims to give users a seamless way of spending their digital assets worldwide.

The MEXC x ether.fi card is fully compatible with Apple Pay and Google Pay, and can be used at more than 150 million Visa merchants globally. Customers can earn up to 4% cashback on their purchases, plus exclusive perks including discounted travel, conference passes and savings of up to 65% on luxury hotels.

“We have the ability to provide more rewards for users,” ether.fi CEO Mike Silagadze said in a recent interview, adding that the card gives users the ability to either spend or borrow against their crypto.

"It could be a really easy way to on-ramp onto the U.S. dollar and use that as savings and spending assets in their local economy—or if you're already based in the U.S., a higher rewards financial product," Silagadze explained.

Ether.fi and MEXCSilagadze has described ether.fi as a "DeFi bank" designed to offer a full end-to-end alternative to traditional financial institutions, built atop self-custodial crypto rails. Founded in 2018, crypto exchange MEXC claims to have more than 40 million users worldwide, with a goal of making digital assets simple and accessible.

“What excites me is when I see people using ether.fi as an alternative to their banks,” Silagadze said. He added that the MEXC x ether.fi card “ultimately puts a lot more power in the hands of users,” offering more competitive benefits for consumers than old-fashioned providers—as well as the freedom to spend and borrow against crypto.

“It’s really just objectively a much better product for people,” he added.

MEXC and ether.fi have introduced exclusive offers for new users of the card. Those who successfully complete a first deposit of more than 100 USDT are eligible to receive a 15 USDT airdrop—and during January, up to 15% cashback for food and dining purchases.

In order to incentivize current card holders to spread the word, a referral program offers a 10 USDT reward for every person they onboard, in addition to 1% cashback on the purchases they subsequently make.

New customers can obtain a MEXC x ether.fi virtual card by completing advanced Know Your Customer verification, filling out an application form, and topping up their ether.fi account via bank transfers or non-custodial wallets.

The product is now available in more than 60 countries globally—spanning Asia, Europe and South America.

Competitive conversion rates and a slick user interface have been top priorities for MEXC and ether.fi in their push to appeal to crypto newcomers, as well as those who already use digital assets.

For years, fiat has been the main option for consumers doing their supermarket shop, or making big-ticket purchases online. MEXC and ether.fi are on a mission to change that—and give crypto far greater levels of utility in daily life, Silagadze said, noting that the crypto market is “evolving toward much more real-world use cases of crypto in people's day-to-day lives."

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Ethereum remains under pressure in a key support zone, teetering between a potential rebound and further decline. While bullish patterns like the cup-and-handle and ascending triangle are shaping up, confirmation is required before any decisive move.

Last Defense Zone: $2,274–$2,104 And The Libra Reversal Setup Kamile Uray shared that Ethereum is currently trying to hold above the critical support zone between $2,775 and $2,623. This area has become a key battleground for bulls and bears, with buyers attempting to defend it to prevent further downside. If this support continues to hold, ETH could regain short-term stability and make another attempt to move higher.

On the upside, a sustained bounce from this zone could allow Ethereum to revisit the pink box resistance around the $3,445 level. A clean breakout above this resistance would activate bullish structures such as a cup-and-handle or an ascending triangle, signaling growing bullish momentum and opening the path toward the $3,894 level. However, this becomes possible if ETH manages to close above the $3,661 peak, confirming the formation of the first major high.

Source: Chart from Kamile Uray on X The $3,894 level carries technical significance, as it represents the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement of the most recent downward wave. A decisive close above this level would suggest continuation of the recovery. Failure to hold above it, however, could trigger renewed selling pressure and lead to another corrective move lower.

On the downside, if Ethereum loses the $2,623 support, a deeper decline toward the pink box zone between $2,274 and $2,104 would become likely. This area is notable for the potential formation of a bullish Libra pattern. Should reversal confirmation emerge from this zone, ETH could attempt another recovery phase, with the broader objective of retesting its previous highs.

Waiting For Confirmation: ETH’s Next Move Depends On Price Action Ethereum is currently following the trajectory outlined by Crypto Candy in a recent update on X. As predicted, the asset dipped into the lower support range between $2,600 and $2,700 and is now attempting to stage a recovery from the zone. Should this upward momentum persist, the immediate objective for bulls is a return to the $3,070 level.

However, for Ethereum to firmly re-enter bullish territory and shift the broader market structure, it must close decisively above the $3,070 threshold. This level serves as the primary gateway for any sustained recovery beyond the current relief rally. Until that breakout occurs, the prevailing market bias remains firmly bearish, as the failure to reclaim and hold above $3,070 suggests that the path of least resistance is still to the downside, with lower price points remaining the primary expectation for the short term.

ETH trading at $2,885 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Pexels, chart from Tradingview.com

-

DENTON, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:SBH) (the “Company”), the leader in professional hair color, announced today that it will host a conference call and webcast on February 9, 2026, at 7:30 a.m. Central Time, to discuss its first quarter financial results.

A copy of the press release announcing the first quarter financial results is expected to be made available on February 9, 2026, before the U.S. financial markets open on the Company's website sallybeautyholdings.com/investor-relations. During the conference call, the Company may discuss and answer one or more questions concerning business and financial matters and trends affecting the Company. The Company’s responses to these questions, as well as other matters discussed during the conference call, may contain or constitute material information that has not been previously disclosed.

A live webcast of the conference call can be accessed through the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at sallybeautyholdings.com/investor-relations/events-and-presentations/events-calendar, or through our third-party host at SBH Q1 Earnings Webcast. Participants should join the webcast ten minutes prior to the start of the conference call.

To join the conference call, participants can pre-register to receive a dial-in number and unique PIN using the following link: Pre-register SBH Q1 Earnings Call. Pre-registration can be completed at any time up to and following the call start time.

For those unable to listen to the live conference call, a replay will be available on the Company’s investor relations website after 10:00 a.m. Central Time on February 9, 2026, through February 9, 2027.

About Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: SBH), as the leader in professional hair color, sells and distributes professional beauty supplies globally through its Sally Beauty and Beauty Systems Group businesses. Sally Beauty stores offer up to 7,000 products for hair color, hair care, nails, and skin care through proprietary brands such as Ion®, Bondbar®, Strawberry Leopard®, Generic Value Products®, Inspired by Nature® and Silk Elements® as well as professional lines such as Wella®, Clairol®, OPI®, L’Oreal®, Wahl® and Babyliss Pro®. Beauty Systems Group stores, branded as Cosmo Prof® or Armstrong McCall® stores, along with its outside sales consultants, sell up to 8,000 professionally branded products including Paul Mitchell®, Wella®, Matrix®, Schwarzkopf®, Kenra®, Goldwell®, Joico®, Amika® and Moroccanoil®, intended for use in salons and for resale by salons to retail consumers. For more information about Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc., please visit sallybeautyholdings.com.

More News From Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.

Back to Newsroom

1. Issuer Details

2. Reason for Notification 
An acquisition or disposal of voting rights

3. Details of person subject to the notification obligation 

Name 
BlackRock, Inc.

4. Details of the shareholder 

Full name of shareholder(s) if different from the person(s) subject to the notification obligation, above 

5. Date on which the threshold was crossed or reached

6. Date on which Issuer notified 

7. Total positions of person(s) subject to the notification obligation 

8. Notified details of the resulting situation on the date on which the threshold was crossed or reached

8A. Voting rights attached to shares 

8B1. Financial Instruments according to (DTR5.3.1R.(1) (a))

8B2. Financial Instruments with similar economic effect according to (DTR5.3.1R.(1) (b)) 

9. Information in relation to the person subject to the notification obligation
2. Full chain of controlled undertakings through which the voting rights and/or the financial instruments are effectively held starting with the ultimate controlling natural person or legal entities (please add additional rows as necessary)

Ultimate controlling person Name of controlled undertaking % of voting rights if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold % of voting rights through financial instruments if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold Total of both if it equals or is higher than the notifiable threshold BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock International Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BR Jersey International Holdings L.P.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock (Singapore) Holdco Pte. Ltd.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock HK Holdco Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Lux Finco S.a.r.l.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Japan Holdings GK   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 1)BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 2)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 2)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 2)Trident Merger, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 2)BlackRock Investment Management, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock International Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BR Jersey International Holdings L.P.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Holdco 3, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Cayman 1 LP   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Cayman West Bay Finco Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Cayman West Bay IV Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Group Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 3)BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock International Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BR Jersey International Holdings L.P.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Australia Holdco Pty. Ltd.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 4)BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Holdco 4, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Holdco 6, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Delaware Holdings Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 5)BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Holdco 4, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Holdco 6, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Delaware Holdings Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 6)BlackRock Fund Advisors   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 7)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 7)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 7)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 7)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock International Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Canada Holdings ULC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 8)BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Capital Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 9)BlackRock Advisors, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Holdco 2, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock International Holdings, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BR Jersey International Holdings L.P.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Holdco 3, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Cayman 1 LP   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Cayman West Bay Finco Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Cayman West Bay IV Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Group Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 10)BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)BlackRock Saturn Subco, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)BlackRock Finance, Inc.   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)Trident Merger, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)BlackRock Investment Management, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)Amethyst Intermediate, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)Aperio Holdings, LLC   BlackRock, Inc. (Chain 11)Aperio Group, LLC   10. In case of proxy voting

11. Additional Information

12. Date of Completion 

13. Place Of Completion 

12 Throgmorton Avenue, London, EC2N 2DL, U.K.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against DeFi Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: DEFT) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired DeFi Technologies securities between May 12, 2025 and November 14, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/DEFT.

DeFi Technologies Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
      (1)   DeFi Technologies was facing delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which at all relevant times was a key revenue driver for DeFi Technologies;
      (2)   DeFi Technologies had understated the extent of competition it faced from other digital asset treasury (“DAT”) companies and the extent to which that competition would negatively impact its ability to execute its DeFi arbitrage strategy;
      (3)   as a result of the foregoing issues, DeFi Technologies was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for the fiscal year 2025;
      (4)   accordingly, defendants had downplayed the true scope and severity of the negative impact that the foregoing issues were having on DeFi Technologies’ business and financial results; and
      (5)   as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

What's Next for DeFi Technologies Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/DEFT. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in DeFi Technologies you have until January 30, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to DeFi Technologies Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for DeFi Technologies Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Integer securities between July 25, 2024 and October 22, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/ITGR.

Integer Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose that:

Integer materially overstated its competitive position within the growing EP manufacturing market;despite Integer’s claims of strong visibility into customer demand, the Company was experiencing a sustained deterioration in sales relating to two of its EP devices;in turn, Integer mischaracterized its EP devices as a long-term growth driver for the Company’s C&V segment;as a result of the above, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. What's Next for Integer Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/ITGR. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Integer you have until February 9, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Integer Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Integer Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Coupang, Inc. (NYSE: CPNG) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Coupang securities between May 7, 2025 and December 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CPNG.

Coupang Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:

(1) Coupang had inadequate cybersecurity protocols that allowed a former employee to access sensitive customer information for nearly six months without being detected; 
(2) this subjected Coupang to a materially heightened risk of regulatory and legal scrutiny;
(3) When defendants became aware that Coupang had been subjected to this data breach, they did not report it in a current report filing (to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)) in compliance with applicable reporting rules; and
(4) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

What's Next for Coupang Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CPNG. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Coupang you have until February 17, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Coupang Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Coupang Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Charming Medical Ltd. (NASDAQ: MCTA) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Charming securities between October 10, 2025 and November 12, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/MCTA.

Charming Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that:
(1)   Charming was the subject of a fraudulent stock promotion scheme involving social media based misinformation and impersonated financial professionals;
(2)   insiders and/or affiliates used offshore or nominee accounts to facilitate the coordinated dumping of shares during a price inflation campaign;
(3)   Charming’s public statements and risk disclosures omitted any mention of the false rumors and artificial trading activity driving the stock price; and
(4)   as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis in fact.

What's Next for Charming Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/MCTA. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Charming you have until February 17, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Charming Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Charming Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Vistagen Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: VTGN) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Vistagen securities between April 1, 2024 and December 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/VTGN.

Vistagen Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that the Defendants:
      (1)   provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors regarding the development and prospects of fasedienol, despite the fact that the Company’s Phase 3 PALISADE‑3 trial of the investigational pherine candidate for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder was beset by materially adverse facts;
      (2)   disseminated false and misleading information and/or concealed material adverse data concerning the PALISADE‑3 study’s design, execution, and clinical results; and
      (3)   as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

What's Next for Vistagen Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/VTGN. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Vistagen you have until March 16, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Vistagen Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Vistagen Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired BellRing securities between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/BRBR.

BellRing Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose materially adverse facts. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that:

(1)    the Defendants failed to disclose to investors that its strong sales results did not reflect increased end-consumer demands or brand momentum;

(2)   rather, customers accumulated excess inventory as a safeguard against product shortages that had previously constrained BellRing's supply;

(3)   once customers gained confidence that product shortages were a thing of the past, they promptly reduced their inventory by selling through existing products and cutting back on new orders; and

(4)   following the destocking, the Company admitted that competitive pressures were materially weakening demand.

What's Next for BellRing Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/BRBR. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in BellRing you have until March 23, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to BellRing Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for BellRing Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

SOURCE Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Michael Burry, the investor made famous by his bet against the U.S. housing market ahead of the financial crisis, disclosed that he has been buying shares of one-time meme darling GameStop.

"I own GME. I have been buying recently. I expect I am buying at what may soon be 1x tangible book value / 1x net asset value," Burry said in a Substack post published Monday. "And getting a young Ryan Cohen investing and deploying the company's capital and cash flows. Perhaps for the next 50 years."

Shares of GameStop surged nearly 7% Monday after the news.

Burry, who recently closed his hedge fund Scion Asset Management, said his investment is a long-term value play rather than a wager on renewed meme-stock speculation. GameStop was in the center of a meme-stock frenzy that erupted roughly five years ago, when retail traders coordinating on online forums drove the shares to extraordinary heights and forced massive short-covering by hedge funds.

"I am not counting on a short squeeze to realize long-term value," he wrote. "I believe in Ryan, I like the setup, the governance, the strategy as I see it. I am willing to hold long-term, and I am excited to see where this goes. I am fifteen years his senior, but not too old to be patient."

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

Key Takeaways IonQ hit its #AQ 64 milestone early and reached 99.99% two-qubit gate fidelity on the Tempo platform.IONQ plans a 256-qubit system using Oxford Ionics' EQC architecture to improve scalability and unit economics.IonQ is expanding beyond hardware via acquisitions and partnerships into defense, biotech and global markets. IonQ’s (IONQ - Free Report) 2026 outlook is shaped by two major growth engines - the commercialization of next-generation quantum computing systems and the expansion of a full-stack quantum platform that broadens its addressable market.

In the last-reported third-quarter 2025, the company delivered its #AQ 64 milestone on the Tempo platform three months ahead of schedule and achieved a record-breaking 99.99% two-qubit gate fidelity. This level of performance materially lowers error-correction requirements, accelerating the path toward larger, more practical quantum systems.

In 2026, IonQ plans to integrate Oxford Ionics’ Electronic Qubit Control (EQC) architecture into a 256-qubit system, leveraging semiconductor-based manufacturing to improve scalability, reliability and unit economics. These advances support IonQ’s competitive differentiation and support the translation of technical breakthroughs into commercial adoption across high-value sectors such as materials science, pharmaceuticals through hybrid quantum-AI workflows and energy optimization.

Complementing this hardware momentum is IonQ’s evolution into a full-stack quantum platform spanning computing, networking, sensing and cybersecurity. Acquisitions such as Vector Atomic and ID Quantique, alongside the launch of IonQ Federal, expand the company’s reach into defense, allied governments and critical infrastructure markets. Strategic partnerships in Europe and Asia and biotech-focused collaborations extend IonQ’s relevance beyond pure computing, enabling multi-year, solutions-oriented revenue opportunities.

Together, these two growth pillars position IonQ to convert technological leadership into sustained commercial traction in 2026.

Peer DiscussionD-Wave Quantum (QBTS - Free Report) : It continues to position itself distinctly within the quantum computing peer group by focusing on quantum annealing rather than universal gate-based systems.

Recently, D-Wavehighlighted improving commercial traction through customer usage of its Advantage systems and cloud-based quantum services, particularly for optimization problems. However, QBTS remains technologically differentiated from gate-based peers, limiting its addressable use cases. While revenue momentum has improved versus prior years, execution risk persists as annealing systems face competitive pressure from advancing classical and gate-based quantum approaches.

Rigetti Computing (RGTI - Free Report) : It remains a key gate-based quantum peer but is still in a rebuild and execution phase. The company has emphasized improvements in qubit fidelity, modular architectures and Fab-1 manufacturing capabilities, while continuing to secure government and research contracts.

Despite these efforts, Rigetti’s systems are earlier-generation compared with leading peers, and revenue visibility remains constrained. Near-term progress hinges on the successful delivery of roadmap milestones and cost discipline, as investors balance RGTI’s long-term technical potential against near-term commercialization challenges.

Key Takeaways Shell is weighing a sale of some or all Vaca Muerta assets, sounding out buyers with no decision.The Neuquen basin holdings could be worth billions, but valuation is unclear amid undeveloped acreage.Under CEO Wael Sawan, Shell is streamlining its portfolio, following exits like the recent Argentina LNG exit. Shell plc (SHEL - Free Report) is considering a potential sale of some or all of its assets in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale play. The company has reportedly approached potential buyers in recent weeks to assess market interest, though no final decision has been made.

The assets, located in Argentina’s Neuquen basin, could be highly valued, running into billions of dollars. However, an exact valuation remains uncertain due to a mix of undeveloped acreage and fluctuating commodity prices.

A Possible Exit From a High-Profile Shale PlayA full divestment would represent a surprising move, as Shell was one of the earliest international oil majors to back the Vaca Muerta formation. Interest in the region has been growing as concerns mount that other major shale basins, including the Permian in the United States, may be nearing peak production.

The potential sale would also follow Shell’s recent decision to exit the Argentina LNG project after state-owned YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF - Free Report) reduced the project’s planned capacity. Together, these moves point to a broader reassessment of the company’s exposure to Argentina.

YPF is one of the primary players in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta, which earmarked a $3.3 billion investment in the premier shale play, providing a significant boost to the Argentinian energy sector. The company intended to raise its oil production from Vaca Muerta to nearly 200,000 barrels per day by the end of 2025 and it also exports a significant portion of its production volume, boosting its earnings capability.

Shell’s Footprint in ArgentinaShell entered the Vaca Muerta shale play in 2012 and has steadily expanded its presence. The company currently holds four majority-owned and operated license blocks, along with minority stakes in three additional blocks operated by YPF. According to Shell’s latest annual report, production from Argentina totaled around 15.6 million barrels in 2024.

Any decision to sell would mark a major shift in Shell’s long-standing involvement in one of South America’s most promising energy regions.

Portfolio Streamlining Under New LeadershipSince Wael Sawan took over as CEO in 2023, Shell has accelerated efforts to streamline its portfolio and improve performance. The company has been selling assets following the underwhelming returns from earlier bets on a rapid transition from oil to renewable energy.

Recently, the company planned to exit Syria’s al-Omar oilfield and is exploring sale options for its stake in LNG Canada. A potential Vaca Muerta divestment would align with this broader strategy.

Why Vaca Muerta Remains AttractiveDespite Shell’s review, Vaca Muerta continues to draw strong interest from producers seeking new growth opportunities. Only about 8% of the formation has been developed, compared with the heavily drilled Permian basin. According to U.S. government estimates, Vaca Muerta holds the world’s second-largest shale gas and fourth-largest shale oil resources.

Earlier this month, Continental Resources acquired minority stakes in four Vaca Muerta blocks, calling the region one of the most compelling shale plays in the world.

Cost Challenges and Competitive EconomicsThe shale play has seen rapid production growth, but several challenges remain. Declining oil prices, higher production costs and transportation bottlenecks have the potential to slow future development. According to Chevron Corporation (CVX - Free Report) , drilling costs in Vaca Muerta are 35% higher than in the Permian basin. Even so, Shell’s assets in the region are believed to break even at Brent oil prices below $50 per barrel, making them competitive compared to many global shale plays.

Chevron also maintains a steady presence in Argentina’s Vaca Muerta shale and eyes it as an increasingly vital part of its global portfolio. Chevron has played a major role in the progress of Vaca Muerta, applying its U.S. shale expertise, especially from the Permian Basin, to boost efficiency and well performance.

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - January 26, 2026) - West Point Gold Corp. (TSXV: WPG) (OTCQB: WPGCF) (FSE: LRA0) ("West Point Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce that it has increased the size of its previously announced "commercially reasonable efforts" private placement from aggregate gross proceeds of up to C$20,000,090 to up to C$25,000,030 including up to 22,727,300 common shares (the "Shares") at an issue price of C$1.10 per Share (the "Offering"), with SCP Resource Finance LP ("SCP" or "Lead Agent") acting as Lead Agent for the Company, on behalf of a syndicate of agents (collectively with SCP, the "Agents").

The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for exploration at the Gold Chain Project in Arizona, USA and for general corporate and working capital purposes.

As consideration for its services, the Agents will receive a cash commission of 5% of the gross proceeds of the Offering, provided that Shares sold to purchasers on the Company President's List will be subject to a reduced cash commission of 2%. The Agents may elect to receive up to 50% of their cash commission in Shares at the issue price. In addition, the Agents will receive broker warrants in an amount equal to 5% of Shares sold, provided that no broker warrants will be issued for any Shares sold to purchasers on the President's List. Each broker warrant issued will be exercisable to purchase one Share at the Issue Price for a period of two years from the closing date of the Offering.

The closing date of the Offering is scheduled to be on or about February 17, 2026, or such other date or dates as the Company and the Lead Agent may agree. The Offering remains subject to the approval of the TSX Venture Exchange and applicable securities regulatory authorities. Certain officers and directors of the Company may participate in the Offering. Any securities issued under the Offering will be subject to a statutory hold period of four months and one day from the date of issuance.

This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of any of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful, including any of the securities in the United States of America. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for account or benefit of, U.S. Persons (as defined in Regulation S under the 1933 Act) unless registered under the 1933 Act and applicable state securities laws, or an exemption from such registration requirements is available.

About West Point Gold Corp.
West Point Gold is an exploration and development company focused on unlocking value across four strategically located projects along the prolific Walker Lane Trend in Nevada and Arizona, USA, providing shareholders with exposure to multiple discovery opportunities across one of North America's most productive gold regions. The Company's near-term priority is advancing its flagship Gold Chain Project in Arizona.

For further information regarding this press release, please contact:
Aaron Paterson, Corporate Communications Manager
Phone: +1 (778) 358-6173
Email: [email protected]

Stay Connected with Us:
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/west-point-gold
X (Twitter): atwestpointgoldUS
Facebook: facebook.com/Westpointgold/
Website: westpointgold.com/

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS:
Certain statements contained in this press release constitute forward-looking information. These statements relate to future events or future performance and the proposed Offering. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company's private placement, future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. The use of any of the words "could", "intend", "expect", "believe", "will", "projected", "estimated" and similar expressions and statements relating to matters that are not historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking information and are based on the Company's current belief or assumptions as to the outcome and timing of such future events including, among others, assumptions about future prices of gold, silver, and other metal prices, currency exchange rates and interest rates, favourable operating conditions, political stability, obtaining government approvals and financing on time, obtaining renewals for existing licenses and permits and obtaining required licenses and permits, labour stability, stability in market conditions, availability of equipment, availability of drill rigs, and anticipated costs and expenditures. The Company cautions that all forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and that actual performance may be affected by a number of material factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. Such factors include, among other things: risks and uncertainties relating to the Company's ability to complete any payments or expenditures required under the Company's various option agreements for its projects; and other risks and uncertainties relating to the actual results of current exploration activities, the uncertainties related to resources estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections in relation to production, costs and expenses; risks relating to grade and continuity of mineral deposits; the uncertainties involved in interpreting drill results and other exploration data; the potential for delays in exploration or development activities; uncertainty related to the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits; the possibility that future exploration, development or mining results may vary from those expected; statements about expected results of operations, royalties, cash flows, financial position may not be consistent with the Company's expectations due to accidents, equipment breakdowns, title and permitting matters, labour disputes or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in operations, fluctuating metal prices, unanticipated costs and expenses, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future and regulatory restrictions, including environmental regulatory restrictions. The possibility that future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with adjacent properties and the Company's expectations; operational risks and hazards inherent with the business of mining (including environmental accidents and hazards, industrial accidents, equipment breakdown, unusual or unexpected geological or structural formations, cave-ins, flooding and severe weather); metal price fluctuations; environmental and regulatory requirements; availability of permits, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves; the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision; the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results; fluctuating gold prices; possibility of equipment breakdowns and delays, exploration cost overruns, availability of capital and financing, general economic, political risks, market or business conditions, regulatory changes, timeliness of government or regulatory approvals and other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the filings on SEDAR+ made by the Company with securities regulators. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this corporate press release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable securities legislation.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR
FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/281640

Source: West Point Gold Corp.

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ:META, XETRA:FB2A, SIX:FB) is set to report its fourth quarter earnings on Wednesday, with Bank of America analysts expecting a modest beat compared to Street expectations while warning that 2026 expense guidance will be the central focus for investors.

The analysts maintained their ‘Buy’ rating and $810 price target, arguing that current valuations already reflect major AI and infrastructure investment.

“Checks suggest potential upside driven by healthy macro, usage growth, & AI targeting,” the analyst wrote.

They expect Q4 revenue of $59.2 billion and EPS of $8.27, compared with Street expectations of $58.3 billion and $8.20. “Data suggests potential Q4 expense discipline, with Q4 job postings down 16% quarter-over-quarter (versus Street 3% quarter-over-quarter),” they noted.

They also highlighted that “set up is aided by growing concerns on 2026 expense guide, risk is a larger-than-expected investment cycle.”

For first-quarter guidance, the analysts forecast revenue between $50 billion and $52.5 billion and full-year 2026 expenses of $153 billion to $160 billion, above Street expectations.

They added that the expense outlook could come in lower if revenue growth weakens, while the upper end of the range would give Meta room to invest more heavily in AI capacity.

For CapEx, they expect guidance in the range of $109 billion to $114 billion, compared to the consensus of $110 billion.

The analysts said that investors have been increasingly focused on Meta’s expected expense growth for 2026, and they believe a guide showing roughly 30% growth would be viewed positively, while a rate at or above 35% could be a negative surprise.

They also noted that upbeat updates on the NT Avocado rollout, new AI video tools, and sustained revenue momentum could help offset concerns. However, they cautioned that if Meta signals a longer or more aggressive investment cycle, pushing both expenses and capital spending higher, analysts may revise 2027 forecasts downward.

On valuation, the analysts wrote that Meta is trading below its historical forward earnings multiple, with current pricing roughly in line with the broader market and below the company’s long-term premium.

“If expense guide is close to expectations, we see potential for AI sentiment & valuation multiple to expand as Street anticipates launch of LLM & new AI products (e.g. Meta Business AI, agents, Vibes expansion),” they wrote.

Shares of Meta traded up 2.3% at about $674 in the early afternoon on Monday, up 2% in the last year.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Bitmine disclosed a fresh increase in its Ethereum holdings during the final week of January. The update adds to a series of recent disclosures tied to large Ethereum positions held by institutions and corporate entities.

Bitmine Expands Ethereum Treasury to $12.8 Billion According to a recent press release, digital asset company Bitmine, which Tom Lee chairs, increased its exposure to Ethereum after buying 40,302 ETH last week. The firm said it had $12.8 billion in combined cryptocurrency and cash holdings as of January 25.

This announcement comes just a week after BitMine announced that it acquired 35,268 ETH. It now holds 4.2 million ETH, alongside 193 Bitcoin, and has $682 million in cash on hand. The company’s ETH holdings account for roughly 3.52% of total circulation. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that its total staked ETH stands at just over 2 million. 

The company also revealed its strategic equity aside from digital assets. It has a $200 million interest in Beast Industries and $19 million set aside for moonshot investments. CoinGape had reported BitMine’s $200 million investment in MrBeast’s company, which Tom Lee explained was part of plans to boost ETH’s mainstream adoption. 

“BitMine has staked more ETH than other entities in the world,” Tom Lee said. “At scale (when BitMine’s ETH is fully staked by MAVAN and its staking partners), the ETH staking fee is $374 million annually (using 2.81% CESR), or greater than $1 million per day.”

BMNR Stock Slips as Whale Ethereum Accumulation Continues However, despite the magnitude of the purchases, the stock of Bitmine declined after the announcement. Data from Yahoo Finance shows that the company’s stock, BMNR, is trading around $28.52. The crypto stock is down amid the decline in the crypto market, led by Bitcoin and Ethereum. 

Source: Yahoo Finance; BMNR Daily Chart Ethereum remains under selling pressure after a failure to defend the key $3,000 support. The asset is priced at $2,900 and has decreased 0.68% in the past day. However, it is down 7.79% on the week and has lost 0.89% in the last month.

Amid the decline, there has been a notable increase in Ethereum whales’ accumulation. In an X post, Onchain Lens revealed that a new wallet purchased 61,000 ETH, valued at $171.15 million, from Binance. Another whale bought 20,000 ETH from Wintermute. The second whale currently owns 100,130 ETH, which is valued at $283.79 million.

As CoinGape reported earlier, the institutional shifts in the market were not limited to Bitmine. World Liberty Financial offloaded over $8 million in Wrapped Bitcoin for 2,868.4 ETH, at an average price of $2,813. The transaction was among the larger cryptocurrency movements in the market in the last few months.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Some coins are trying to return to the green zone, according to CoinStats.

ETH chart by CoinStatsETH/USDThe price of Ethereum (ETH) has gone up by 0.36% over the past day.

Image by TradingViewOn the hourly chart, the rate of ETH is testing the local resistance at the $2,934 level. If its breakout happens, the upward move may continue to the vital $3,000 zone.

Image by TradingViewOn the longer time frame, the price of the main altcoin is rising after a false breakout of the support at $2,791. However, the volume remains low, which means traders are unlikely to see sharp moves soon. 

You Might Also Like

All in all, consolidation in the area of $2,900-$3,000 is the most likely scenario over the next few days.

Image by TradingViewFrom the midterm point of view, the situation is similar as none of the sides is dominating. In this regard, traders are unlikely to witness sharp ups or down soon.

Ethereum is trading at $2,940 at press time.

One thing we rarely think about is how bad weather can affect Bitcoin's security, but it happens fairly regularly. Snow can legitimately pose a risk to Bitcoin miners who secure the blockchain.

The snow shows up on the weather map first, a fat smear of color stretching across state lines. Then it turns into the stuff you actually feel: power lines dancing in the wind, crews on standby, households trying to keep the heat on.

Somewhere behind that very normal human scene is a different kind of appliance: rows of Bitcoin miners that do one job when electricity is cheap and plentiful, then sometimes stop on purpose when the grid is under stress.

That is the backdrop for two things that happened close together and are easy to misread if you only look at the headline numbers: a sharp shift at the largest Bitcoin mining pool in the US, Foundry, and a broad dip in network hashrate that showed up in the charts.

The hashrate dip everyone seesIf you follow mining data day to day, you probably saw the same thing: hashrate suddenly printing lower, with a big red percentage next to it.

BitInfoCharts, a chart many people screenshot and share, showed a notable 24-hour drop in its daily estimate at the time of writing. That is where the “nearly 10%” chatter comes from, and the swing can print even larger depending on the exact moment you check.

Bitcoin hashrate drip (Source: Bitinfocharts)The first thing to keep in mind is that “hashrate” on these dashboards is rarely a direct reading of machines. It is an estimate inferred from blocks found over a period of time.

That sounds academic until you remember how Bitcoin works. Blocks come in bursts and then dry spells, even when nothing changes in the real world.

Providers like Blockchain.com have long noted that short windows can be noisy for exactly that reason, and using a 7 or 14-day average is often less sensationalist.

So a one-day drop is a clue. It is not a conviction.

Bitcoin 7-day average hashrate (Blockchain.com)When the dip is real, you usually see it somewhere else too. Block times stretch out, difficulty estimates roll over, and the mempool can start to feel tighter if demand is there.

In fact, on the day in question, mempool data did show slower block production, with average block time prints around the 11-minute range in a snapshot view on mempool.space.

Still, that kind of reading does not prove a specific percentage drop on its own. But it does rhyme with a period where a chunk of mining capacity is actually offline, not just shuffled between pools.

The storm, the grid, and the part people forgetNow we add the human part back in: the US is heading into a major winter system.

Reporting from AP described a massive storm setup with widespread impacts and large numbers of customers losing power in some regions.

When storms like that hit, the grid becomes the story, not Bitcoin. It is easy to see miners as bystanders.

In the US, they are often wired into the plot.

A growing slice of industrial-scale mining in places like Texas behaves like an interruptible load. Miners sign agreements; they can curtail quickly, they can earn credits, and the grid operator has a lever to pull when demand spikes.

You can see this concept described in government language too. The US EIA has discussed large loads, including crypto mining, participating in voluntary curtailment arrangements with ERCOT.

On the corporate side, the speed is not hypothetical.

CleanSpark has described curtailing hundreds of megawatts across multiple sites within minutes in response to a TVA request, as covered by DataCenterDynamics.

That is the kind of capability that can show up on a chart as a cliff, because it is a cliff.

This is why a big storm and a sudden hashrate dip can be related, even if you never see a miner in a snowbank.

Weather drives demand. Demand stresses the grid. Miners either lose power or choose to sell power back to the grid.

The network feels it as fewer hashes per second.

There is another layer too: grid operators often telegraph the stress windows.

Coverage from Axios flagged the strain risk across systems like ERCOT and PJM during the storm period.

Local reporting has also pointed to emergency measures and backup generation being considered, including reporting from the HoustonChronicle on steps taken around extreme cold.

This is where we need to ground the narrative without overselling it. Storms create the conditions for curtailment and outages.

Curtailment and outages can create a real hashrate drawdown. The drawdown can show up as slower blocks and a dip in daily hashrate estimates.

Foundry, and why this one pool mattersFoundry is a lightning rod in mining discourse because it is big, US-linked, and coordinates a meaningful chunk of block production.

Depending on the lookback window, Foundry’s block share often sits in the high 20s to low 30s. The Hashrate Index currently has it around 22% over the past 3 days, down from 30% over the month.

Bitcoin mining pools (Source: Hashrate Index)When Foundry shows a sharp move, it starts conversations that go way beyond Foundry.

During the recent cold snap, reporting from TheMinerMag, described Foundry’s hashrate falling from roughly 340 EH/s at a peak to around 242 EH/s, a drop of around 30%.

It also cited Luxor dropping, with more than 110 EH/s taken offline across those two pools.

As of press time, Foundry's 3-day average market share has fallen to 21.95% with its hashrate at just 185.9 EH/s.

Top Bitcoin mining pools (Source: TheHashrateIndex)The reason this matters is that Foundry can function as a proxy for US mining behavior.

If a lot of US-based capacity is clustered in the same weather system, connected to the same power market logic, and coordinated through a few major pools, a storm does not just knock on one door.

It knocks on the same hallway.

The risk that mattersThis is where we get out of the day-to-day churn and into something we can hold onto.

The mining system has two kinds of concentration that matter during stress: geographic concentration and coordination concentration.

Geographic concentration means a bunch of machines sit under the same sky, exposed to the same cold front, the same ice, the same grid-operator notices.

Coordination concentration means a lot of those machines point at the same pool, so the public dashboard moves in a way that feels like a single organism.

When both are true, weather becomes a trigger for a sudden and visible hashrate shock.

Even if the wider network does not lose 30%, the public sees a big pool wobble, and that has its own consequences.

The technical consequences are straightforward. If miners truly go offline, blocks slow until difficulty adjusts.

The economic consequences depend on demand. If blocks slow and the mempool is busy, fees rise.

If blocks slow and the mempool is quiet, the fee impact is muted.

Right now, the “busy mempool” part is not guaranteed.

Recommended fee levels have been sitting low at times on mempool.space, so you can frame fee impact as conditional, tied to whether demand spikes during a supply shock.

The narrative consequence is bigger. Every time a big US-linked pool moves sharply, people start asking questions about resilience, decentralization, and who really steers block production.

Miner behavior when the lights flickerThere is another reason storms matter to mining: they intersect with a quieter story about miner balance sheets and survival.

If a miner curtails for a few hours or a day, revenue drops, and fixed costs keep ticking. Management has to decide what to do.

Some miners will monetize power markets, some will sell Bitcoin, and some will do both, and those choices show up downstream.

Riot’s updates are a useful example of how active treasury management has become.

Riot disclosed selling 1,818 BTC in December 2025 for $161.6 million in net proceeds, according to the company’s own release at Riot.

CleanSpark also reported sales activity in its own updates, with industry coverage summarizing those figures, including Blockspace.

This matters because a storm-driven curtailment window can become a cash-flow event.

If miners can earn credits by turning off, they have a cushion. If they cannot, they may lean harder on treasury sales.

We all understand what happens when the income clock pauses, but the bills do not.

The macro layer, why this keeps coming backStorms are episodic. The system design is ongoing.

Mining has been moving toward regions where power is plentiful, flexible, and market-based. That often means being closer to grids that can ask for curtailment when demand spikes.

That is part of why US mining has become both influential and exposed.

Commentary from mining analytics shops has also highlighted winter energy dynamics and curtailment as a recurring driver behind hashrate weakness, as discussed by HashrateIndex.

JPMorgan’s view points to the other side of the coin: when hashrate falls, profitability for the remaining miners can improve.

That creates a perverse incentive loop where some miners benefit from others being forced offline.

Then you have longer-range forecasts that put more weight on the supply side: more hashrate coming online over time, more competition for megawatts, and more pressure on margins.

Hashlabs, for example, has modeled a wide range of end-2026 hashrate outcomes, with estimates in the 1.7 ZH/s neighborhood depending on assumptions.

Storms punch harder in a tight-margin environment.

When miners have room, they absorb downtime. When they are squeezed, every curtailment window is a financial decision.

So is the storm related to the hashrate drop?Here is the honest version: yes, it could be.

You can build a credible case without pretending you have a meter on every ASIC in America.

A strong linkage looks like this: storm warnings intensify, grid operators brace, outages spread, miners curtail or lose power, network block times drift up, difficulty expectations tick down, daily hashrate estimates print lower, and big pools with US exposure show a visible drop.

We have several of those elements: storm severity and outages from AP, grid-stress framing from Axios, and curtailment capability and incentives from the EIA and DataCenterDynamics.

We also have Foundry’s drawdown during cold conditions.

What we should avoid is treating the loudest 24-hour number as the whole story.

Daily hashrate charts are useful. They are also jumpy, and that caveat is documented by Blockchain.com.

How this impacts everyday holdersThe real theme is the idea that a network people call unstoppable is still plugged into the same messy world as everyone else.

Bitcoin runs on math, and it also runs on electricity. Electricity runs on weather, politics, and infrastructure that can fail.

When a storm barrels toward the US, families stock up on batteries, utilities position trucks, and miners decide whether to keep hashing or cash in their flexibility.

In the middle of all that, the blockchain keeps moving, sometimes a little slower, and the charts twitch like a seismograph.

Foundry’s shift is part of that picture. It is a reminder that mining coordination has gravity, that big pools reflect big concentrations of power, and that extreme weather can turn that concentration into a sudden shock you can see from your phone.

The broader hashrate dip is the other half. It is the network-level pulse check, and it raises a question readers can understand even if they never cared about hashrate before:

How fragile is this system when the weather gets weird?

During the Jan 2026 winter storm, Foundry’s share of the network slipped slightly while the 7‑day smoothed hashrate showed a local dip (~951 EH/s). Difficulty edged lower through the window, and the theoretical block time, calculated from hashrate and difficulty, briefly spiked above 14 minutes.Where this goes nextThe forward-looking takeaway is simple: extreme weather is becoming a recurring stress test for US mining, and US mining has become a stress test for Bitcoin’s visible decentralization story.

If miners keep leaning into grid programs, expect more short-lived cliffs during heat waves and freezes.

If hashrate keeps trending upward over the long run, the cliffs may get sharper when margins are tight. That is where treasury behavior starts to matter, as shown by Riot and others.

The next storm will be a systems story, not just a weather story.

That is what makes this interesting, even when the hashrate line bounces back a day later.

Mentioned in this article

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

According to Cardano blockchain explorer Cexplorer, the largest Cardano address holds 1.93 billion ADA.

Cexplorer shares a screenshot of the top 10 addresses by ADA balance. Sitting in the first spot is an ADA wallet with a balance of 1.93 billion ADA.

The whale's first activity dates back to five years, five months ago on Aug. 18, 2020. This comes about three years after Cardano's launch, which was created in September 2017. The ADA price ranged between $0.0869 and $0.0184 around the time of the whale's first activity.

HOT Stories

The Cardano price later rose the following year to reach an all-time high of $3.10 on Sept. 2, 2021.

The ADA price subsequently retreated with the whale's staying power put to test, albeit it remained resilient.

According to Cexplorer data, the Cardano top address was last active about 27 days ago, showing inactivity so far this year.

Cardano whales ("leviathans") account for 9.7% of supply According to Cexplorer data, Cardano whales, which hold between one million and five million ADA hold 3.73 billion, about 9.7%  of the circulating supply.

You Might Also Like

"Humpbacks" which, according to Cexplorer's classification, hold between 5 million and 20 million ADA, control a total of 2.97 billion ADA or 7.7% of the supply.

"Leviathans" are the biggest Cardano holders and might consist of crypto exchanges owning 20 million ADA and above. The total ADA held by this category is 17.52 billion, or 45.6% of the circulating supply.

Cardano newsIn recent news, Cyber Hornet has filed for an S&P Crypto 10 ETF, which could be the first S&P-linked spot basket and includes Cardano.

FluidTokens is entering the final phase for the Bitcoin Cardano bridge. In a tweet, FluidTokens revealed that its Bifrost GitHub documentation is being written and added to its repos. It highlighted that the final stretch of development has arrived, with Bitcoin liquidity about to be unlocked on Cardano.

ARK has filed for ARK CoinDesk 20 Crypto ETF. Cardano (ADA) is part of the application, along with BTC, XRP, ETH, SOL and others. The crypto ETF is expected to trade on NYSE, now pending regulatory approval.

RIVER is a newly emerging token that turned into one of the day’s biggest winners. Despite the all-time highs, the token came with warnings of significant insider holdings. 

RIVER is one of the recent new runners, rising to an all-time high of $87.73. The token broke out in the past few weeks, showing an unusual risk appetite for a relatively new asset. RIVER has entered a period of rapid token unlocks and may also face selling pressure in the coming weeks. 

RIVER remains volatile, later falling below $80, reversing the trend just hours after climbing to its record. The rapid expansion and volatility led to more interest in the project and its potential risks. 

The token was launched toward the end of 2025 by River, Inc., a new DeFi protocol with a native stablecoin. Until the recent rally, River was a relatively small protocol with $161M in liquidity. As Cryptopolitan reported, River attracted $8M in funding from TRON DAO.

River’s native stablecoin, SatUSD, had a supply of around $158M with multi-chain presence. 

RIVER flagged for significant insider holdings RIVER is a multi-chain token with representation on BNB Chain, Ethereum, and Base. All chain holdings have a different composition, based on Bubblemaps data. On Base, over 88% of the supply is not distributed and is held on a single address. 

On Ethereum and BNB Chain, RIVER is held in connected wallet clusters, suggesting potential insider accumulation. RIVER pumped due to a relatively small outstanding supply of 19.6M tokens, with a total supply of $100M. 

The token’s trading is highly concentrated on Bitget, where market makers can boost liquidity and encourage more active trading. Additionally, RIVER had a derivative market on Binance, where the price liquidated short positions close to $90. 

Recently, open interest on RIVER reached a peak above $214M, signaling increased interest in speculative bets. More than 64% of all positions were short, leading to the rapid short squeeze in the past days. However, most of the available positions were closed or liquidated, leading to a price slide. 

Traders fear RIVER crash  RIVER is setting expectations of crashing to near-zero, similar to other newly launched tokens. On BNB Chain, the top holder carries over 69.3% of the supply, based on decentralized on-chain data. 

The token has been mentioned by top influencers, including Arthur Hayes, but it is still considered at risk for insider selling. The token is represented on decentralized markets, including PancakeSwap and Uniswap. 

The asset is also extremely volatile, as only one liquidity provider ensures over 59% of the liquidity in the PancakeSwap pair. 

 The top two whale traders have already extracted close to $2M from the decentralized market, selling into strength while RIVER rallied. The presence of whales and influential traders is opening RIVER to even greater risks. 

The token has been around for a few months, accumulating over 25K reported holders. However, some of the smaller wallets may be connected to a smaller number of real holders. 

RIVER continues to be promoted as potentially breaking out above $90 or even to $100, but analysts remain skeptical, especially under the worsening crypto market sentiment.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Neither bulls nor bears are controlling the situation on the market at the beginning of the week, according to CoinStats.

Top coins by CoinStatsBTC/USDThe price of Bitcoin (BTC) has fallen by 0.19% since yesterday.

Image by TradingViewThe rate of BTC is near the local resistance at $88,389. If the daily bar closes above that mark, the upward move is likely to continue to the $89,000 zone soon.

Image by TradingViewOn the longer time frame, the price of the main crypto is going up after a bounce back from the support at $86,363. 

You Might Also Like

If the bar closes far from that mark, traders may witness an ongoing upward move to the $90,000 zone for the rest of the week.

Image by TradingViewFrom the midterm point of view, the situation is unclear as the rate of BTC is far from key support and resistance levels. Thus, the volume has dropped, confirming the absence of buyers and sellers' energy. In this case, sideways trading in the range of $86,000-$90,000 is the most likely scenario until the end of the month.

Bitcoin is trading at $88,184 at press time.