Market Signal Briefing

Amid ongoing crypto market uncertainty, one on-chain metric indicates Chainlink (LINK), Cardano (ADA) and Ethereum (ETH) could all be significantly undervalued.

The digital asset analytics firm Santiment says all three assets are flashing negative percentages for their 30-day Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratios.

The MVRV is the ratio of a crypto asset’s market capitalization relative to its realized capitalization, or the value of all the coins at the price they were bought.

When the MVRV value drops below zero, it indicates that the asset is oversold, as traders who bought it at a certain time frame are witnessing losses.

Explains Santiment,

“The lower a coin’s 30-day MVRV is, the less risk there is in opening or adding on to your position.

A coin having a negative percentage means average traders you’re competing with are down money, and there is an opportunity to enter while profits are below the normal “zero-sum game” level. The more negative, the more safe it is for you to buy.

A coin having a positive percentage means average traders you’re competing with are up money, and there is increased risk to enter while profits are above the normal “zero-sum game” level. The more positive, the more dangerous it is for you to buy.”

Chainlink’s 30-day MVRV percentage is -9.5%, Cardano’s is -7.9% and Ethereum’s is -7.6%.

XRP is also flashing an “undervalued” ratio at -5.7%, while Bitcoin (BTC) clocks in at “mildly undervalued,” with a score of -3.7%, according to the analytics firm.

The BMNR stock price retreated by over 1.18% on Monday as the recent crypto market crash continued and as BitMine continued its Ethereum accumulation.

Summary

The BMNR stock price retreated on Monday as the crypto market crash continued. Ethereum price has formed several bearish chart patterns pointing to more downside   Technical analysis suggests that the stock has more downside to go in the near term. BitMine stock was trading at $28.35, down by over 82% from its 2025 high. Its crash has wiped out billions of dollars in value as the market capitalization dropped from over $18 billion to the current $12.8 billion.

BitMine, the company Tom Lee runs, announced that it continued accumulating Ethereum (ETH) toward its goal of owning 5% of the market capitalization. It now holds 4.243 million coins and is on track to hit the 6 million target this year. It also owns 193 Bitcoin (BTC) in Eightco Holdings, shares worth $19 million, and a recent investment in Beast Industries.

🧵
BitMine provided its latest holdings update for January 26th, 2026:

$12.8 billion in total crypto + "moonshots":
– 4,243,338 ETH at $2,839 (@coinbase)
– 193 Bitcoin (BTC)
– $200 mllion stake in Beast Industries @MrBeast
– $19 million stake in Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: $ORBS)…

— Bitmine (NYSE-BMNR) $ETH (@BitMNR) January 26, 2026 BitMine, unlike Michael Saylor’s Strategy, has no debt and has over $682 million in cash and short-term investments. Most importantly, it has started staking its Ethereum holdings, a move that will generate over $500 million in annual revenue as long as the staking yield remains above 2.5%.

The main risk the BitMine stock faces is that Ethereum price continues to drop and has formed a risky pattern pointing to more downside in the near term. The chart below shows ETH price has formed a bearish flag pattern and has remained below all the moving averages and the Supertrend indicator.

These patterns, along with ongoing ETH ETF outflows, suggest the coin will continue falling, potentially to the key support level at $2,500. 

ETH price chart | Source: crypto.news  The ongoing Ethereum price crash will affect the value of its holdings in the near term. However, the only benefit is that Tom Lee believes the long-term ETH forecast is bullish and that it will hit $7,500. If this view is accurate, it means that the falling dollar cost averaging will be beneficial for the company in the long term.

BMNR stock price technical analysis  The daily timeframe chart shows that the BMNR stock price has remained under pressure in the past few months. It formed a symmetrical triangle pattern and has now moved below its lower side and the 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement level.

BMNR stock chart | Source: crypto.news The stock remains below the 50-day and 100-day Exponential Moving Averages. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the stock continues to fall, with the next key support level to watch being the psychological $20 level.

Bitcoin's January rally has lost traction, with the leading cryptocurrency retracing more than 10% from its mid-month peak as institutional demand softens and exchange-traded fund (ETF) flows turn decisively negative.

Lawrence Jengar Jan 26, 2026 18:07

BNB Chain's Good Vibes Only hackathon enters build phase with 60+ AI projects competing for $2,000 prizes. Winners announced January 29.

BNB Chain's Good Vibes Only hackathon attracted over 60 project submissions in just four days, with the build phase now officially underway as of January 26. Winners will be announced January 29, with each receiving $2,000 and a demo slot on BNB Chain's official livestream.

The eight-day online hackathon, which launched January 22, focuses on AI-powered applications built on the BNB Chain ecosystem. Community voting accounts for 50% of final scores, pushing participants to build in public through daily GitHub updates and demo videos shared on X with the #VibingOnBNB hashtag.

Ctrl + Shift Challenge Drops January 28Organizers will announce a surprise feature requirement just 24 hours before the deadline. Successful implementation earns a 20% scoring bonus, though participation remains optional. The challenge tests adaptability—a nod to real-world development conditions where requirements shift mid-project.

What's Being BuiltThe qualified projects span practical trading tools to experimental AI applications. Notable entries include TradeCat, an open-source signal hub for verifiable trading data, and a BSC meme market-making tool addressing the chain's liquidity gaps for speculative tokens.

Other projects lean creative: a dream interpretation app combining Freud, Jung, and traditional Chinese dream analysis; a mood-based meal recommendation system; and a Twitter bot capable of reverse image searches and automated responses.

A funding analysis platform tracking real-time net inflows into BNB Alpha and Fourmeme tokens could prove useful for traders monitoring memecoin activity on the chain.

Market ContextThe hackathon arrives during a busy period for BNB. Grayscale filed an S-1 for a BNB ETF with the SEC on January 24, while European provider Virtune launched a BNB exchange-traded product on January 22. BNB traded at $872.98 on January 26, down 0.87% over 24 hours with a market cap of $118.76 billion.

BNB Chain also announced a partnership for an Intelligent Privacy Pool on January 26, signaling continued infrastructure development alongside the developer-focused hackathon.

What Happens NextParticipants must share GitHub repositories and maintain public build logs through January 28. The Ctrl + Shift challenge announcement drops that day via BNB Chain's X account and Discord. Final judging combines community votes with sponsor evaluations, with winners revealed during the January 29 livestream.

Projects listed remain early-stage MVPs without audits—BNB Chain explicitly warns users against connecting wallets or interacting with any submissions on-chain.

Image source: Shutterstock

bnb chain hackathon web3 development ai crypto bsc

Tallinn introduces major storage optimizations, reinforcing Tezos’ ability to scale without compromising decentralization.

Tezos has successfully activated its Tallinn protocol upgrade following a decentralized, on-chain governance process involving bakers and community members.

Developed by Nomadic Labs, Trilitech, and Functori, the 20th upgrade shortens block times, strengthens network security by expanding validator participation, and introduces an address indexing system that considerably reduces storage costs for developers.

As noted by the team, the 20th upgrade reduces layer 1 block times to six seconds, improves finality, and strengthens security through universal validator attestations using BLS signatures.

“Adapting to market demand 20 times over 7 years without network disruptions, and in a fully decentralized way, is undeniable proof of Tezos’ reliability and future-proof design,” said Yann Régis-Gianas, Head of Engineering at Nomadic Labs, which contributed to the upgrade alongside Trilitech and Functori.

The Tallinn upgrade introduces major performance and efficiency gains for the Tezos blockchain.

In addition to faster block production, the update adds an Address Indexing Registry that can reduce application storage requirements by up to 100x, lowering costs and increasing throughput for enterprise apps, NFT platforms, and large ledgers built with Michelson.

“Based on inputs from Tezos builders, our development team is excited to be able to offer such drastic improvements for enterprise-scale apps, large NFT ledgers, and other setups storing many addresses,” said Yann Régis-Gianas, Head of Engineering at Nomadic Labs.

Activated through Tezos’ on-chain governance process, Tallinn enhances both scalability and decentralization without network disruption.

The upgrade also strengthens Tezos’ role as a settlement layer for Etherlink, its EVM-compatible layer 2, which now benefits from L1 finality in two blocks, or 12 seconds.

Colombia’s second-largest private pension and severance fund manager, AFP Protección, plans to launch an investment fund with exposure to Bitcoin.

The plan was confirmed by Juan David Correa, president of Protección SA, in an interview with local outlet Valora Analitik. Correa said access to the product will be limited and offered only through a personalized advisory process that evaluates each client’s risk profile. 

Only investors who meet defined criteria will be able to allocate a portion of their portfolios to Bitcoin.

Correa framed the initiative around diversification rather than a change in core investment strategy. 

“The most important element is diversification,” he said, adding that eligible clients will be able to assign a percentage of their portfolios to exposure to this type of asset if they choose.

Protección’s move follows a similar step by Skandia Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones y Cesantías, which introduced Bitcoin exposure in one of its portfolios in September. With this launch, Protección became the second major pension fund administrator in Colombia to offer clients access to Bitcoin-linked investments.

Bitcoin as an additional investment option for Colombia The company said the new product does not alter how the majority of pension savings are managed. Fixed income instruments, equities and other traditional assets will continue to form the foundation of both mandatory and voluntary pension portfolios.

The Bitcoin-linked fund is positioned as an additional option for qualified investors seeking broader portfolio construction rather than a replacement for existing allocations.

Founded in 1991, AFP Protección manages more than 220 trillion Colombian pesos, or about $55 billion, in assets. The firm serves more than 8.5 million clients across mandatory pension plans, voluntary pension products and severance savings accounts. 

The broader mandatory pension fund market in Colombia reached 527.3 trillion pesos as of November 2025, with close to half of those assets invested outside the country.

The announcement comes as Colombia tightens oversight of the digital asset sector. Earlier this month, the national tax authority, DIAN, introduced a mandatory reporting framework for crypto service providers. The rules require exchanges, custodians and intermediaries to collect and submit user and transaction data.

The framework aligns Colombia with the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, enabling automatic exchange of crypto-related tax information with other jurisdictions. 

Service providers must report identifying information and transaction details for reportable users and comply with due diligence and valuation standards or face penalties, per local reports. 

Micah Zimmerman

Micah first discovered Bitcoin in 2018 but remained a skeptic on the sidelines for too long. Since 2021, he has covered crypto and business and now works as a news reporter for Bitcoin Magazine, based in North Carolina.

Bitcoin Price Weekly Outlook What a disastrous weekly close for Bitcoin, that about sums it up. After tapping $98,000 resistance the week prior, the bitcoin price just went straight down last week to close near the lows at $86,588. The bulls have been corralled back into their pens and will need a lot of help to break out once again. The bears will look to continue their momentum into this week to break down the $84,000 support level once and for all, and take the price down to the low $70,000 area. Bulls must defend $84,000 like never before to avoid a breakdown this week.

Key Support and Resistance Levels Now The bears are back in town. $87,000 support has been lost, and $84,000 may not hold another test. If the bears can manage to get a daily close or two below $84,000, the price should accelerate down to the $72,000 to $68,000 support zone. We likely see a bounce from down there, but if it eventually gives wa,y we will look to the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level at $58,000.

After grinding above several resistance levels recently, the bulls are back where they started. Bulls must reclaim $88,000 first and foremost. From there, they will look to get above $91,400, then $94,000 once again. $98,000 has proven itself as strong resistance above here. In the unlikely event the bulls can push above $98,000, it should be a slow go up to $103,500.

Outlook For This Week This week is make-or-break for the bulls. Failure to defend $84,000 this week will likely send the price down to new lows. There is a large slate of big companies reporting earnings this week, so if the results are very strong, it could help buoy the bitcoin price to sustain major support levels. Although correlations to stocks have been weak lately, there are no guarantees that bitcoin will benefit from any upward market movement. Odds are in the bears’ favor for a breakdown this week.

Market mood: Bearish – The bulls showed some strength in the prior week for a slight advantage, but the bears took full control last week, driving the price right back down to the lows.

The next few weeks The weekly chart was looking for a bounce recently, and it got one. The price action this past week, however, has put in a strong indication that this bounce may be over and new lows may be on the horizon as the price closed below the 100-week SMA. The MACD oscillator is firmly in bearish territory, and while it looked like it may see a bullish cross last week, the bears came out in force and prevented that bullish cross from taking place. The relative strength index has crossed back down below the 13 SMA and sits in a bearish posture once again.

Terminology Guide Bulls/Bullish: Buyers or investors expecting the price to go higher.

Bears/Bearish: Sellers or investors expecting the price to go lower.

Support or support level: A level at which the price should hold for the asset, at least initially. The more touches on support, the weaker it gets and the more likely it is to fail to hold the price.

Resistance or resistance level: Opposite of support.  The level that is likely to reject the price, at least initially. The more touches at resistance, the weaker it gets and the more likely it is to fail to hold back the price.

SMA: Simple Moving Average. Average price based on closing prices over the specified period. In the case of RSI, it is the average strength index value over the specified period.

Oscillators: Technical indicators that vary over time, but typically remain within a band between set levels. Thus, they oscillate between a low level (typically representing oversold conditions) and a high level (typically representing overbought conditions). E.G., Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence-Divergence (MACD).

RSI Oscillator: The Relative Strength Index is a momentum oscillator that moves between 0 and 100. It measures the speed of the price and changes in the speed of the price movements. When RSI is over 70, it is considered to be overbought. When RSI is below 30, it is considered to be oversold.

MACD Oscillator: Moving Average Convergence-Divergence is a momentum oscillator that subtracts the difference between 2 moving averages to indicate trend as well as momentum.

Fibonacci Retracements and Extensions: Ratios based on what is known as the golden ratio, a universal ratio pertaining to growth and decay cycles in nature. The golden ratio is based on the constants Phi (1.618) and phi (0.618).

XRP’s upside now depends heavily on BTC’s performance & macro backdrop: a tentative bottom call or huge reversal?

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: January 26, 2026 │ 5:22 PM GMT

Created by Gabor Kovacs from DailyCoin

Cilinix, the host of a daily XRP-focused market update channel, says the token may have carved out a “local bottom” after a bearish weekend, arguing that the latest drop was both anticipated and, so far, relatively orderly. Speaking at the start of the new trading week, Cilinix framed the move as part of a broader phase of crypto weakness rather than the start of a deeper XRP-specific collapse.

Custom Indicator Flashes Local Bottom As XRP Holds Key Support On the chart, the analyst highlighted a series of green arrows from a proprietary “mean reversion” indicator, noting that “historically, those are actually a decent sign of a local bottom.” While he cautioned that the signal “doesn’t always work” and rarely marks a full trend reversal, recent instances have aligned with short-term lows.

XRP’s price action around the latest support zone is central to his thesis. The analyst argued that XRP is now “establishing support… around these lows we created” and said he does not currently see a strong case for that level to fail. He expects price to trade in a relatively tight band, describing a likely range between roughly $1.82 and $1.92 in the near term, with the possibility of a push toward a previously flagged target zone around $1.98–$2.00 if conditions calm.

The outlook is constrained less by XRP’s chart and more by the broader crypto tape. The analyst reiterated that “crypto markets specifically have been quite weak… over the course of the last three months” and noted he doesn’t see “a lot of leverage coming into XRP right now.”

On the macro side, he pointed to equities and the volatility index (VIX) to argue that, while there is clear “unrest in the markets,” the backdrop does not yet point to a “severe crash.” Equities opened lower but “rallied higher straight away” and the VIX, though elevated, is “not extremely elevated” which he reads as consistent with risk but not outright panic.

Bitcoin remains the decisive variable. The analyst described BTC as “looking pretty good… good enough to find local bottom but… not good enough yet to expect a move to the upside.” Given XRP coin’s super-tight correlation with Bitcoin (BTC), this supports his base case of sideways consolidation rather than an immediate breakout.

For investors, the message is cautious but not overtly bearish: short-term downside appears limited if current support holds, but a sustained move into and beyond the $1.98–$2.00 zone likely depends on both macro stability and a stronger bid returning to Bitcoin and the wider crypto complex — conditions he describes as possible, but far from guaranteed.

Dig into DailyCoin’s top crypto news today:
SwapNet Base Hack Drains $16.8M, Circle Criticized Over USDC Freeze
Ripple’s Quiet Power Play In Hong Kong: Part Of CZ’s ‘Super-Cycle’?

People Also Ask: Is the analyst calling a long-term bottom for XRP?

No. He is specifically talking about a potential “local bottom,” not a full-bull trend reversal.

What price levels is he watching now?

He cites a working range around $1.82–$1.92, with a medium-term target zone near $1.98–$2.00 if fundamentals stay stable.

How important is Bitcoin to this XRP view?

Very. The analyst stresses XRP’s close correlation with Bitcoin and says BTC must strengthen before expecting a major XRP rally.

Does he expect another sharp crash soon?

Based on current equity & volatility, he does not see a reason to expect a “severe crash” at this time, but flags macro risk as a key wild card.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Key NotesBlackRock's proposed ETF would actively manage Bitcoin holdings by writing call options to generate premium income for investors.The filing signals a shift from viewing Bitcoin purely as a passive store of value toward yield-generating investment products.Investors could earn monthly income but may face capped returns if Bitcoin prices surge dramatically while options are active. Global investment firm BlackRock has filed an S-1 application form with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch an iShares Bitcoin BTC $87 633 24h volatility: 0.2% Market cap: $1.75 T Vol. 24h: $59.39 B Premium Income ETF.

While not yet approved, the new ETF product would consist primarily of Bitcoin, with shares of iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and cash premiums. According to the S-1 filing, it would function as a yield-bearing product whose performance will be based on the price of Bitcoin “while providing premium income through an actively managed strategy of writing (selling) call options on IBIT shares.”

BlackRock just dropped the official S-1 for it's upcoming iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF.. no fee or ticker yet. The strategy is to "track performance of the price of bitcoin while providing premium income through an actively managed strategy of writing (selling) call options… pic.twitter.com/CZDahm4mNj

— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) January 26, 2026

The Bitcoin Income Strategy The S-1 document, a preliminary filing, is dated Jan. 23 with no clear timeline for approval. Typically, SEC approvals for S-1 documents can take months due to the necessity for issuance and potential rule changes in support of the filing. If approved, however, the new ETF would trade on the NASDAQ exchange under an as-yet-to-be-named ticker. A space on the form where the firm could have indicated a preferred or requested ticker was left blank.

While similar products exist in the form of the Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF, launched in April 2025, and the YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF, which launched in April 2024, BlackRock’s represents the largest to date and signals a greater shift away from the tradfi view of Bitcoin as a passive store of value.

These ETFs are actively managed by institutional traders who monitor markets in real-time. Investors’ funds are held in Bitcoin itself and, in BlackRock’s case, also in shares of its Bitcoin Spot ETF product. Fund managers are able to write call options against these holdings which, under optimal circumstances, results in cash premiums from selling these options.

This allows investors to treat Bitcoin as both a store of value and a yield-bearing asset that provides monthly income. This could serve as a bulwark against cryptocurrency volatility, but it also means investors could see income capped if Bitcoin skyrockets while direct holders benefit.

Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

Bitcoin ETF News, Cryptocurrency News, News

Tristan is a technology journalist and editorial leader with 8 years of experience covering science, deep tech, finance, politics, and business. Before joining Coinspeaker, he wrote for Cointelegraph and TNW.

Tristan Greene on X

The crypto market’s sustained downturn since mid-October has had a major impact on Bitcoin-buying firms such as Tokyo-listed Metaplanet.

Metaplanet reported a staggering impairment loss of 104.6 billion yen — about $680 million at current exchange rates — from its Bitcoin stockpile.

Paper Losses With Bitcoin hovering around $88,365 on Monday, a majority of digital asset treasuries faced unrealized losses.

In a Monday notice, Metaplanet reported an impairment loss of about $680–$700 million. This accounting loss, the company noted, is booked as a non-operating expense and does not affect cash flows or business fundamentals. Metaplanet’s BTC yield, defined as the growth in Bitcoin holdings per share, jumped 568% over the year, despite share dilution.

Metaplanet owned roughly 35,102 BTC, worth over $3.08 billion, by the end of 2025.

Advertisement  

With the BTC-linked impairment, the company expects a consolidated ordinary loss of $633 million and a consolidated net loss of $491 million. That leaves Metaplanet on course to book a deep annual loss for the fiscal year ended December 2025, despite stronger underlying operating performance, with final full‑year results set for release on Feb. 16.

Metaplanet Remains Optimistic About Its Future Despite the losses, Metaplanet revised its full-year 2025 forecasts upward,  thanks to its expanding Bitcoin Income Generation business, which mainly employs derivatives and options strategies on the apex crypto.

Revenue is now projected at 8.9 billion yen, up 31% from the earlier forecast of 6.8 billion yen, while operating income is expected to rise 34% from 4.7 billion yen to 6.3 billion yen. The company also attributed the growth to diversified funding sources, including the issuance of its Class B perpetual preferred equity, MERCURY, and the creation of a $500 million credit facility.

Moreover, Metaplanet stressed that its Bitcoin strategy, including acquisition and income generation, remains on track.

“While short-term accounting volatility is inherent to our business model, our medium-to-long-term BTC accumulation and capital strategy remain on track,” the company postulated in the statement.

Bitcoin traders will parse Federal Reserve guidance on Jan. 28 for signals on real yields, the dollar, and dollar-liquidity plumbing. Those channels can move spot prices even if the policy-rate corridor is unchanged.

The Fed’s calendar shows the Federal Open Market Committee meeting runs Jan. 27–28, with the press conference on Jan. 28.

Traders often watch the 2 p.m. ET statement and 2:30 p.m. ET chair’s press conference as two catalysts; Kiplinger’s economic calendar lists them separately.

The practical baseline into the decision is the target range set in the most recent Dec. 10, 2025 implementation note.

That note instructed the New York Fed’s trading desk to maintain the federal funds rate in a 3.50% to 3.75% corridor and set interest on reserve balances at 3.65%, effective Dec. 11, 2025.

In mid-January, the effective federal funds rate printed at 3.64% on both Jan. 16 and Jan. 22, placing the market’s short-rate anchor near the middle of the corridor going into FOMC week, according to FRED’s EFFR series.

Even with a hold, Bitcoin’s macro sensitivity can route through repricing of the expected path.

Term rates, real yields, and dollar funding conditions can move on tone, projections, and press conference answers.

That “path beats the decision” framework is consistent with the Fed’s December meeting.

The minutes describe meaningful internal disagreement around the December decision and document market sensitivity to communications about the expected policy path, alongside discussion of tighter money-market conditions, low ON RRP usage and greater spread sensitivity to reserve levels.

What to watch beyond the rate decisionFor crypto desks framing the week as a risk map rather than a binary rate bet, a working hierarchy starts with real yields.

After that comes broad dollar strength, then liquidity plumbing that can amplify a macro surprise.

The 10-year Treasury inflation-indexed yield (DFII10) stood at 1.95% on Jan. 22.

The level matters because higher real yields tend to tighten financial conditions for long-duration risk.

Lower real yields tend to ease them, even when the policy corridor is unchanged.

The cross-check after the statement and press conference is whether DFII10 moves directionally in the sessions that follow.

An FOMC hold can still reprice the real-rate term structure if the chair’s answers pull expectations toward “higher for longer” or toward earlier easing.

A second input is the nominal broad U.S. dollar index (DTWEXBGS), a Board of Governors series carried by FRED that tracks broad dollar strength against a basket.

In practice, a firmer broad dollar often aligns with tighter global liquidity conditions for dollar-priced risk.

A softer dollar can ease those conditions, so the post-event read-through is whether DTWEXBGS confirms or offsets the move in real yields after the event window.

The less-discussed layer is liquidity plumbing, where Treasury cash management and money-market facility usage can change the marginal availability of reserves that support risk taking.

The Treasury General Account (WTREGEN) most recently stood near $869 billion on a week-average basis (week ending Jan. 21).

That level matters because a TGA rebuild can drain reserves at the margin as cash moves from the banking system to the Treasury’s account at the Fed.

The rest of the triangle is reserve balances (WRESBAL), total Fed assets (WALCL) and overnight reverse repo usage (RRPONTSYD).

Each is published through FRED and the Fed’s H.4.1 release hub, including WRESBAL, WALCL and RRPONTSYD.

RRPONTSYD is defined by FRED as an aggregated daily amount of overnight reverse repurchase transactions.

That definition is relevant because shifts in where cash is parked across money markets can change sensitivity to policy surprises.

The Dec. 2025 minutes provide context for why these plumbing variables can matter around an FOMC, referencing tighter money-market conditions, low ON RRP usage and spread sensitivity to reserve levels.

EventTime (ET)Why it matters for BTC riskSourceFOMC statement2:00 p.m., Jan. 28Immediate repricing of forward path via rates, real yields and USDKiplinger calendarPowell press conference2:30 p.m., Jan. 28Second volatility window if answers shift “path” expectationsKiplinger calendarFOMC meeting datesJan. 27–28Sets the schedule for the statement and press conferenceFed calendarThree “hold” scenarios for Jan. 28With that hierarchy, three “hold” scenarios frame the Jan. 28 tape without requiring a forecast of the rate decision itself.

The corridor is already defined at 3.50% to 3.75%.

A dovish hold is one where the committee maintains the corridor while communications pull the expected path toward earlier or deeper easing. That setup would most often be validated by real yields moving down from current levels and the broad dollar softening in subsequent sessions.A neutral hold is one where messaging stresses data dependence and flexibility. That can leave Bitcoin’s direction more dependent on positioning and volatility dynamics around the 2:00 and 2:30 windows rather than sustained moves in DFII10 or DTWEXBGS.A hawkish hold is one where the corridor stays in place while the forward path reprices toward tighter conditions. That setup would often be accompanied by higher real yields and a firmer broad dollar.It becomes more market-sensitive if reserve conditions are already tight or if Treasury cash balances are rebuilding.

Some desks also plan for a “hawkish cut” pattern, where a cut is delivered but communication keeps financial conditions restrictive.

The actionable point for Bitcoin remains the same: whether DFII10 and the broad dollar move in the direction consistent with easier or tighter conditions after the decision window.

For an example of how “hawkish cut” dynamics have played out in crypto market coverage, see CryptoSlate’s prior reporting on a hawkish cut setup.

A practical way to separate noise from a repricing is to compare realized post-event movement with an options-implied yardstick for a 24-hour Bitcoin window.

One commonly used convention is to convert Volmex-style event expectations (Bitcoin and Ethereum volatility metrics) to 24-hour ranges. We can convert implied volatility to a daily move by dividing by the square root of 365 calendar days.

Applied to FOMC week, that template can be run twice, from 2:00 p.m. ET to 2:00 p.m. ET the next day and from 2:30 p.m. ET to 2:30 p.m. ET the next day.

The goal is to test whether the statement or the press conference drove any outsized move.

For traders seeking context beyond the event day, a past study of 2025 post-FOMC seven-day returns placed outcomes in a range from about +6.9% to -8.0%.

Meeting-to-meeting results vary and depend on the macro backdrop. However, that history is better treated as a distribution of outcomes than a playbook.

The Fed’s minutes emphasize how shifts in communication and forward-path expectations can dominate the decision itself.

Post-meeting checks over the next 24–72 hoursAfter the Jan. 28 event window, the next 24 to 72 hours of monitoring tends to be mechanical.

The first check is whether DFII10 holds its post-meeting direction, since it printed 1.95% on Jan. 22 and can shift quickly if real yields reprice with the forward path.The second is whether DTWEXBGS trends in the same direction as real yields, because cross-asset trades often need confirmation from both rates and FX to persist.The third is whether liquidity measures reinforce or offset the macro impulse, using TGA levels, reserve balances, Fed balance sheet data, and daily ON RRP aggregates.These all feed the same reserve-sensitivity channel discussed in the Dec. 2025 minutes.

VariableLatest datapoint in packPost-FOMC read-through for BTCSourcePolicy corridor3.50% to 3.75%Sets the “hold” baseline; path and tone still reprice term ratesFed implementation noteEFFR3.64% (Jan. 16 and Jan. 22)Anchors front-end funding conditions into the meetingFRED10-year real yield (DFII10)1.95% (Jan. 22)Direction can dominate BTC reaction even on a holdFREDTGA (WTREGEN)$869B (week ended Jan. 21)TGA rebuild can drain reserves at the marginFREDBroad USD (DTWEXBGS)Series definition for broad dollar strengthConfirmation layer for global liquidity conditionsFREDThe week’s setup leaves Bitcoin exposed less to the corridor print itself than to whether the Fed’s communication shifts the forward path enough to move real yields and the dollar.

Then, traders will watch whether liquidity plumbing reinforces the move through reserve sensitivity.

For related CryptoSlate context on policy-driven liquidity narratives, see coverage of quantitative tightening and Fed-linked volatility.

TL;DR

BitMine expanded its Ethereum treasury to 4,243,338 ETH, equivalent to $12.3 billion and 3.52% of Ethereum’s circulating supply. The company has 2,009,267 ETH in staking, generating estimated annual revenue of $374 million, and is preparing to launch its MAVAN network in the first quarter of 2026. It also holds 193 BTC, $682 million in cash, and stakes in Beast Industries and Eightco. BitMine Immersion significantly increased its Ethereum treasury, reaching a total of 4,243,338 ETH after acquiring an additional 40,302 ETH over the past week. At current market prices, these holdings are worth around $12.3 billion and represent 3.52% of ETH’s circulating supply, estimated at 120.7 million tokens.

The company continues advancing toward its goal of controlling 5% of the ETH supply, equivalent to approximately 6.04 million tokens. In six months, BitMine has already achieved nearly 70% of that target. With this volume, it stands as the largest Ethereum treasury holder globally, ahead of SharpLink, with around 863,000 ETH, and The Ether Machine, with roughly 496,700 ETH.

BitMine Prepares for MAVAN Launch Of the total ETH held by the company, 2,009,267 tokens are currently staked. That amount grew by 171,264 ETH over the past week and represents roughly half of the total holdings. With a CESR rate of 2.81%, full staking of the portfolio would generate estimated annual revenue of $374 million. The company is working with three providers while advancing the deployment of its own validator network, MAVAN, scheduled for the first quarter of 2026.

In addition to Ethereum, BitMine holds 193 BTC, $682 million in cash, a $200 million stake in Beast Industries, and a $19 million investment in Eightco Holdings. The Beast Industries investment closed in January and is initially recorded at cost within the company’s internal “moonshots” segment.

Top 100 Most-Traded Stocks BitMine shares rank among the most actively traded in the U.S. market. According to Fundstrat data, BMNR recorded an average daily trading volume of $1.2 billion over the past five days, placing it 91st among more than 5,700 U.S.-listed companies.

The company also ranks as the second-largest public crypto treasury firm globally, behind Strategy, which holds over 700,000 BTC. BitMine is backed by institutional investors including ARK Invest, Founders Fund, Pantera, Galaxy Digital, DCG, Kraken, and Bill Miller III, in addition to direct participation from Tom Lee

Metaplanet Inc. shares fell after the company revised its full-year forecast for fiscal 2025, reported a massive $720 million Bitcoin impairment charge, and issued a fiscal 2026 outlook heavily dependent on BTC-linked income.

The Tokyo-listed firm announced it booked a Bitcoin impairment loss of $720 million (¥104.6 billion) following a BTC price decline. It also reported a $155 million (¥22.6 billion) foreign-exchange translation gain from yen depreciation in other comprehensive income. After netting these effects, Metaplanet said the value of its Bitcoin net assets dropped by about $565 million (¥82 billion) for the period. The company held 35,102 Bitcoin as of Dec. 31, 2025.

Metaplanet declined to provide guidance for ordinary income or net income attributable to shareholders, citing Bitcoin price volatility as too unpredictable.

Fiscal 2026 Forecast Bets Big On BTC IncomeMetaplanet projected fiscal 2026 revenue of $110 million (¥16.0 billion), more than double its fiscal 2025 revenue forecast of $61 million (¥8.9 billion). It forecast operating income of $78 million (¥11.4 billion), assuming selling, general, and administrative expenses of about $32 million (¥4.6 billion).

The company expects $107 million (¥15.6 billion) of its $110 million revenue forecast to come from Bitcoin Income Generation operations. It said expanded Bitcoin holdings in fiscal 2025 increase available capital and BTC collateral for Bitcoin-related options, supporting premium income through fiscal 2026.

Metaplanet converts yen to U.S. dollars for operations and Bitcoin purchases. The firm plans to continue separating Bitcoin price effects from foreign-exchange impacts in its disclosures and describes itself as a "Bitcoin Treasury company," publishing daily BTC holdings, unrealized gains/losses, and related metrics on its website.

Metaplanet shares are trading within a broad consolidation pattern after a sharp rally triggered by the company's initial Bitcoin purchases. The weekly chart shows price action within a rising channel, with recent candles compressing into a defined accumulation range, signaling cooling momentum rather than a trend reversal, as higher lows hold above channel support.

Volume expanded during the initial breakout, then faded during sideways action. Recent volume pickup near range lows suggests renewed buyer interest defending support. The volume profile shows heavy trading interest clustered below current price levels, often acting as a cushion during pullbacks.

Technical analysis from X user Enea₿ highlights upside targets at $6.20 (¥900), $13.45 (¥1,954), and $30.50 (¥4,435) over a six-month horizon. These levels align with prior resistance and rising channel extensions but assume Bitcoin recovers toward $115,000 territory, keeping Metaplanet's equity tightly correlated to BTC price action.

As long as price holds within the accumulation box and respects rising channel support, the broader structure remains bullish. A sustained breakout above the range would target the lower levels first, while channel support failure would undermine the setup. For now, the chart shows healthy consolidation within an established uptrend.

Journalist

Posted: January 26, 2026

Axelar [AXL] saw a remarkable 1,200% increase in daily trading volume and had rallied 19.8% on Sunday, the 25th of January.

The recent Bitcoin [BTC] bearish hiccup that sent it below $88k affected the wider market, including AXL’s lower timeframe momentum.

Source: AXL/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-day chart, the structure was bearish after the drop on the 20th of January. That move below $0.066 confirmed a bearish continuation.

During the recent days’ rally up to $0.083, Axelar was unable to close a daily trading session above the key overhead supply zone.

This rejection might be temporary.

The OBV has made new highs, higher even than the mid-December ones. The 1-day RSI has also picked up and looks to stay above the neutral 50 mark.

Traders and investors have reason to be cautiously optimistic about a recovery.

However, for now, the bearish bias must remain in place on the higher timeframes. The moving averages did not see a crossover yet, and the bearish structure remained unbroken.

The bearish argument for AXL

Source: AXL/USDT on TradingView

Based on the recent lower timeframe swing move higher, a set of Fibonacci retracement levels was plotted. At the time of writing, the price threatened to fall below the 78.6% retracement level at $0.072.

The RSI has slipped below neutral 50 on the hourly chart, and AXL was trading below the 50-period moving average.

Taken together, it could be the beginning of a bearish spell.

Traders’ call to action- Stay sidelined The huge Open Interest increase and swift weekend gains might not be sustainable. A deep market retracement and some consolidation might be necessary before bulls gather the steam for their next attempt.

This next attempt could be more successful, especially if Bitcoin does not sink far below $84k.

Over the next week or two, AXL traders can wait for a consolidation around $0.065-$0.072 and a gradual recovery to look to buy.

A price drop below $0.065 would be a warning of a bearish continuation.

Final Thoughts The Axelar short-term price action had been bullish over the weekend, but the token experienced a sizeable pullback. The momentum for the coming days could be bearish, and swing traders looking to go long would want to see a positive reaction at $0.072. Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

TL;DR

ETH fell below $3,000 into the $2,900 zone, and whales resumed buying on exchanges and OTC, with one Wintermute desk purchase moved to Lido. Liquid staking topped $43B TVL on Jan. 26 as some whales pledged liquid-staked tokens to borrow and re-buy ETH. World Liberty Fi swapped WBTC for ETH via CowProtocol to 22K+ ETH, while an OG whale borrowed on Aave and carried $779M+ unrealized losses; OI hit $16.28B. Ethereum slipped below $3,000 and into the $2,900 range, and large holders treated the move as a reload point rather than a capitulation signal. Whales are rebuilding ETH exposure around the $2,800 support zone where many accumulated in prior years. Buying showed up on exchanges and through over-the-counter desks, with one wallet sourcing ETH via Wintermute’s OTC desk and then sending the tokens to Lido for liquid staking. That route did not lift open-market pricing, but it did add to staking balances as the market stayed range bound. Holders still lean on staking and lending.

Whales lean on staking loops and DeFi rotations Liquid staking has been expanding again in recent weeks, recovering from local lows, and the sector held more than $43 billion in value locked as of Jan. 26. The dip is being used to compound positions through staking receipts that can be pledged for liquidity. Because ETH is range bound, some whales are looping: they stake or hold liquid-staked tokens, borrow against them, and recycle proceeds into additional ETH purchases. The approach carries liquidation risk if price swings sharply, but the activity suggests users are managing collateral to avoid automatic liquidations in today’s $2,800 zone.

One notable rotation came from World Liberty Fi, whose known wallet has been actively reshuffling DeFi exposure and moving between wrapped assets. World Liberty Fi shifted from WBTC into ETH, signaling that ETH utility inside DeFi can trump Bitcoin wrappers when yields compress. The wallet routed swaps through CowProtocol and ended with more than 22,000 ETH, according to the on-chain footprint described. Those tokens have not been returned to staking so far. The piece notes WBTC balances fell to 125.33K as its DeFi footprint shrank, while WBTC yield on Aave was described as extremely low.

The trader who shorted on Oct. 10 is now stuck in an ETH long, with unrealized losses over $779 million. The OG whale is amplifying exposure with a borrow-and-buy loop built on Aave. A linked wallet withdrew ETH from Binance, deposited it to Aave, and bought more with borrowed funds, betting the $2,800 range holds. Sentiment sat neutral at 40 points and open interest rose to $16.28 billion from $15.78 billion. More than 75% of traders were long and liquidation-prone, while on Hyperliquid only 51% of whales were long as retail activity thinned in January.

Brian Niccol plowed millions of dollars into improving customers' Starbucks experience in his first year at the helm with a focus on barista training, and he isn't done yet.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against CoreWeave, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired CoreWeave securities between March 28, 2025 and December 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CRWV.

CoreWeave Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
      (1)   Defendants had overstated CoreWeave's ability to meet customer demand for its service;
      (2)   Defendants materially understated the scope and severity of the risk that CoreWeave's reliance on a single third-party data center supplier presented for CoreWeave's ability to meet customer demand for its services;
      (3)   the foregoing was reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on the Company's revenue;
      (4)   as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

What's Next for CoreWeave Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/CRWV. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in CoreWeave you have until March 13, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to CoreWeave Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for CoreWeave Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Blue Owl Capital Inc. (NYSE: OWL) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Blue Owl securities between February 6, 2025 and November 16, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/OWL.

Blue Owl Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose to investors:

(1) that Blue Owl was experiencing a meaningful pressure on its asset base from BDC redemptions; 
(2) that, as a result, the Company was facing undisclosed liquidity issues; 
(3) that, as a result, the Company would be likely to limit or halt redemptions of certain BDCs; and 
(4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

What's Next for Blue Owl Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/OWL or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Blue Owl you have until February 2, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Blue Owl Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Blue Owl Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE: ARE) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Alexandria securities between January 27, 2025 and October 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/ARE.

Alexandria Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:

Defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of the Company’s Long Island City (LIC) property;The Company’s claims and confidence regarding the leasing value of the LIC property as a life-science destination were misleading and lacked a reasonable basis, particularly in connection with ARE’s Megacampus™ strategy; andAs a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
What's Next for Alexandria Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/ARE. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Alexandria you have until January 26, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Alexandria Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Alexandria Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized law firm, notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Gauzy Ltd. (“Gauzy” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: GAUZ) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy securities between March 11, 2025 and November 13, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/GAUZ.

Gauzy Case Details

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that:

three of the Company's French subsidiaries lacked the financial means to meet their debts as they became due;as a result, it was substantially likely insolvency proceedings would be commenced;as a result, it was substantially likely a potential default under the Company's existing senior secured debt facilities would be triggered; andas a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. What's Next for Gauzy Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/GAUZ. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Gauzy you have until February 6, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Gauzy Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman for Gauzy Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com.

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace,” said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC. 

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Nathan Miller
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising. 
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. 

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) and Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), and their broker-dealer subsidiaries (together, the “Defendants”). The action alleges that Defendants defrauded investors by placing and executing manipulative trades designed to artificially deflate the price of Quantum Biopharma Ltd. (“Quantum”) (NASDAQ: QNTM) securities.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that sold Quantum securities between January 6, 2021 and October 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/QNTM.

Quantum Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: 

(1) Defendants repeatedly entered thousands of spoofed sell orders designed to create the false appearance that Quantum’s stock price was declining; 
(2) These manipulative orders were calculated to—and did—deceive or induce investors to sell their shares at artificially depressed prices; 
(3) After driving the market price down, Defendants purchased Quantum shares at these artificially deflated levels, positioning themselves to profit from the scheme; and 
(4) As a result of Defendants’ misconduct, investors, including Plaintiff, were improperly induced into selling their shares at artificially depressed prices.

What's Next for Quantum Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/QNTM or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Quantum you have until February 23, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Quantum Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Quantum Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Bitdeer Technologies Group (NASDAQ: BTDR) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Bitdeer securities between June 6, 2024 and November 10, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BTDR.

Bitdeer Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: 
 (1) Defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while concealing material adverse facts regarding the true state of Bitdeer’s SEALMINER A4 project; (2) Defendants failed to disclose that the SEAL04 chip, projected to achieve a chip-level energy efficiency of 5 J/TH, would not be ready for use in the A4 rigs as represented; and (3) Mass production of the SEAL04 chip was not expected to begin in the second quarter of 2025 as previously indicated.     What's Next for Bitdeer Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/BTDR. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Bitdeer you have until February 2, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Bitdeer Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Bitdeer Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

NEW YORK, Jan. 26, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (NASDAQ: SFM) and certain of its officers.

This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Sprouts securities between June 4, 2025 and October 29, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/SFM.

Sprouts Case Details

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:

Sprouts’ growth potential for fiscal year 2025 was overstated; Defendants assured investors that the Company’s customer base would remain resilient to macroeconomic pressures and that Sprouts would benefit from perceived tailwinds from a more cautious consumer; and Defendants concealed that a more cautious consumer could, in fact, lead to a significant slowdown in sales growth and that the purported tailwinds would be insufficient to offset the slowdown or would fail to materialize entirely.
What's Next for Sprouts Investors?

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/SFM. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Sprouts you have until January 26, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.

No Cost to Sprouts Investors

We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.

Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Sprouts Securities Class Action?

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com

"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.

Contact Info

Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]

Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Bank of Marin (BMRC - Free Report) reported $34.17 million in revenue for the quarter ended December 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 22.1%. EPS of $0.59 for the same period compares to $0.38 a year ago.

The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $33.35 million, representing a surprise of +2.47%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +16.44%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.51.

While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.

As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately.

Here is how Bank of Marin performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Net interest margin (FTE): 3.3% compared to the 3.3% average estimate based on three analysts.Total non-accrual loans: $26.9 million versus $28.83 million estimated by two analysts on average.Average Balance - Total interest-earning assets: $3.69 billion versus $3.62 billion estimated by two analysts on average.Net interest income: $31.18 million versus the three-analyst average estimate of $30.37 million.Total non-interest income: $2.82 million compared to the $2.79 million average estimate based on three analysts.Net Interest Income (FTE): $31.36 million versus $30.59 million estimated by two analysts on average.View all Key Company Metrics for Bank of Marin here>>>

Shares of Bank of Marin have returned -0.6% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.2% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term.

NVIDIA (NVDA)’s share price soared by 73%, in the past nine months, driven by a potent combination of AI-generated demand in data centers and impressive Q3 earnings.

SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA - MAY 30: An exterior view of the NVIDIA headquarters on May 30, 2023 in Santa Clara, California. Chipmaker NVIDIA reached a $1 trillion market cap at the open bell of the NYSE on Tuesday morning. The company is forecasting second quarter sales of $11 billion, 50 percent higher than analyst estimates of $7.15 billion. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Although margins decreased slightly, a notable rise in revenue and a growing P/E multiple signify the market’s trust in its GPU leadership and advancements in the automotive sector. Let’s explore the narrative behind this increase.

The following is an analytical assessment of stock performance divided into significant contributing factors.

NVDA

Trefis

What’s going on here? The stock experienced a 73% increase, spurred by a 43% uptick in revenue and a 26% rise in P/E multiple, despite a 5.1% decrease in net margin. Let’s delve into the factors responsible for these changes.

This Is Why NVIDIA Stock Changed

AI Data Center Growth: Continued strong demand for AI chips led to substantial revenue growth in data centers.Impressive Q3 FY2026 Earnings: Strong financial results were reported in November 2025, showing revenue up 62%, surpassing market forecasts.Growth in Automotive Sector: Expanding collaborations and new AI algorithms for self-driving vehicles enhanced this area.GPU Market Leadership: NVIDIA retained a commanding market share in AI accelerators and discrete GPUs.High Demand for Blackwell/Rubin: Strong demand and sold-out status for the latest generation of AI platforms like Blackwell.Our Current Assessment of NVDA Stock

MORE FOR YOU

Opinion: We currently view NVDA stock as attractive but subject to volatility. Why is this the case? Check out the complete story. Read Buy or Sell NVDA Stock to understand the basis for our current stance.

Risk: A reliable way to assess the risk associated with NVDA is to observe its performance during significant market downturns. It fell approximately 85% during the Global Financial Crisis and nearly 68% during the Dot-Com collapse. The corrections in 2018 and Inflation Shock both witnessed declines exceeding 55%. Even throughout the shorter Covid pandemic, NVDA still retraced about 38%. Strong fundamentals are important, yet during major market disruptions, NVDA has demonstrated it can face severe setbacks.

While NVDA stock may have experienced robust recent increases, investing in a single stock without extensive, thorough analysis can be precarious. The Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, consisting of 30 stocks, has a history of comfortably outpacing its benchmark, which includes all three indices—the S&P 500, S&P mid-cap, and Russell 2000. What accounts for this? Collectively, HQ Portfolio stocks have yielded better returns with reduced risk compared to the benchmark index; providing a smoother investment experience, as illustrated by HQ Portfolio performance metrics.