Market Signal Briefing

Ethereum (ETH) continues to out-earn Solana (SOL) on network fees despite an extended period of ultra-low per-transaction costs, underscoring a widening split in how the two leading smart contract blockchains monetize activity. As of Wednesday ET, Ethereum posted roughly $8.07 million in 24-hour fees versus Solana’s $5.03 million—about a 60% gap that analysts increasingly read as a proxy for where high-value settlement is taking place, not which chain processes the most transactions.

The divergence is more pronounced over longer windows. Over the past seven days, Ethereum generated about $63.68 million in fees compared with Solana’s $35.83 million. Over 30 days, Ethereum collected approximately $327.16 million—around 67% more than Solana’s $196.01 million. Market observers say the 30-day figure matters most because it filters out one-off spikes and better reflects structural demand for block space and settlement services.

A key takeaway from the latest data is what appears, at first glance, to be a paradox: Ethereum’s total fee revenue has remained resilient even as average transaction fees have, at times, approached near-zero levels. The pattern does not necessarily indicate that Ethereum has become “free,” but rather that fee formation is shifting toward aggregated value flows—especially those routed via layer-2 networks and institutional-grade activity—where the economic weight concentrates at the settlement layer. In this model, revenue is less about ‘profit per individual transaction’ and more about ‘total value being finalized’ on the network and its scaling stack.

Industry participants point to stablecoins and real-world assets (RWA) as the core catalyst behind Ethereum’s revenue durability. Circle’s (Circle) roadmap for Arc L1 and its broader USDC expansion strategy are being interpreted as more than an infrastructure upgrade; they are viewed as a bid to reshape where onchain financial activity—payments, treasury and balance-sheet operations, and FX settlement—ultimately clears. Those activities generate swap, lending, and settlement fees that, in aggregate, accrue to the networks where finality and composability are most trusted.

Ethereum and its layer-2 ecosystem remain central venues for issuing and settling tokenized financial products tied to RWAs. Market examples frequently cited include tokenized Treasury exposure and yield-bearing stable assets such as USYC, which tend to cluster where institutional liquidity and established DeFi plumbing are deepest. The implication is that ‘transaction quality’—large, compliant, balance-sheet-relevant flows—can sustain material fee generation even when retail-facing base fees compress.

Solana, by contrast, is executing a ‘high-volume’ playbook. With average fees commonly cited in the $0.001 to $0.017 range, Solana has optimized for gaming, high-frequency trading, and meme-coin speculation—categories that can explode in activity when marginal costs are negligible. The network is routinely described as absorbing hundreds of millions of transactions weekly, but the trade-off is structural: ‘revenue per transaction’ is low, meaning Solana must process vastly more activity to match Ethereum’s fee totals. Over the last 30 days, Solana’s fee revenue remained about 40% below Ethereum’s, reinforcing the view that it has captured user scale faster than it has captured high-margin financial settlement.

Notably, both networks have shown signs of stabilizing fee dynamics compared with prior cycles. Recent daily fee change rates around -0.52% for Ethereum and -0.4% for Solana point to lower volatility than the boom-and-bust patterns associated with earlier DeFi and NFT-driven periods. Some analysts interpret this as evidence that onchain revenue is gradually becoming less dependent on purely speculative bursts and more tied to repeatable financial use cases.

The expanding RWA segment may sharpen the role differentiation further. Tokenized bonds, commodities, and asset-backed instruments typically attract larger, longer-duration capital that moves infrequently—but in size—often producing higher total fees when it does rebalance or settle. Ethereum is widely viewed as better positioned for these ‘low-frequency, high-value’ flows, while Solana’s strengths are clearest in ‘high-frequency, low-value’ activity such as micropayments and real-time trading.

Solana’s roadmap could widen the performance gap on throughput and responsiveness if upgrades such as Alpenglow (aimed at ultra-fast finality) and Firedancer (a high-performance client) deliver as expected. Even so, the network’s core monetization question remains whether fee revenue can scale proportionally with transaction growth, or whether the economic structure continues to cap upside without a greater share of institutional settlement and RWA-driven activity.

Heading into the close of the first quarter of 2026, the fee “race” is increasingly being framed as two distinct business models rather than a single leaderboard. Ethereum is defending its position as a ‘financial layer’ that captures higher-value settlement, while Solana is consolidating a ‘traffic layer’ advantage that maximizes usability and transaction count. The current ~60% fee gap is therefore being treated less as a transient metric and more as a signal of where capital prefers to reside and clear.

Two catalysts will likely determine whether that gap narrows. First is how Circle’s Arc initiative and the next phase of stablecoin expansion redistribute ‘settlement revenue’ across base layers and layer-2 ecosystems. Second is whether Solana can absorb more RWA issuance and institutional flows to escape a persistently low-margin fee structure. For now, the market’s takeaway is blunt: the chain that “wins” is not necessarily the one that processes the most transactions—it is the one that settles the most expensive ones.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

🔎 Market Interpretation

Fees signal “where value settles,” not raw traffic: Ethereum continues to generate materially higher total fees than Solana despite periods of near-zero average transaction fees, implying higher-value settlement and block-space demand on Ethereum’s stack.

Current fee spread remains meaningful across timeframes: ETH leads SOL by roughly ~60% over 24 hours ($8.07M vs $5.03M), by a similar magnitude over 7 days ($63.68M vs $35.83M), and by ~67% over 30 days ($327.16M vs $196.01M). The 30-day view is treated as the most structurally informative.

“Low fees” on Ethereum don’t equal “low revenue”: The apparent paradox is explained by aggregation—economic weight concentrates at the settlement layer (often via L2 batching and institutional flows), so total fees can stay resilient even when per-tx fees compress.

Stablecoins + RWA are the durability engine: Expansion around USDC and Circle’s Arc L1 roadmap is interpreted as a push to anchor payments, treasury operations, and FX settlement where composability and finality are most trusted—supporting fee generation through swaps, lending, and settlement activity.

Two business models are emerging: Ethereum is framed as a “financial layer” (low-frequency, high-value settlement) and Solana as a “traffic layer” (high-frequency, low-value activity). The “winner” is increasingly defined by the costliness of settled transactions, not transaction count.

Fee volatility is moderating: Recent daily fee change rates (ETH ~-0.52%, SOL ~-0.4%) suggest a shift away from boom-bust speculation cycles toward more repeatable financial use cases.

💡 Strategic Points

Investors/analysts: Use rolling 30-day fee totals as a proxy for structural demand and monetization strength; short-term spikes can mislead when “meme/airdrop/NFT bursts” fade.

Ethereum thesis reinforcement: Growth in stablecoin settlement, RWA issuance (e.g., tokenized Treasuries, yield-bearing stable assets like USYC), and institutional liquidity pipelines can sustain fee revenue even with low base fees.

Solana monetization challenge: With typical fees cited at $0.001–$0.017, SOL needs outsized throughput to match ETH’s fee totals; closing the gap likely requires capturing more institutional settlement and RWA-driven flows, not just more transactions.

Playbook differentiation:

ETH: Prioritize trust, composability, and settlement assurances for large, compliant flows (treasury ops, collateral movement, RWA rebalancing).

SOL: Leverage ultra-low fees for consumer-scale apps (gaming, real-time trading, micropayments), while building pathways to higher-value activity.

Catalyst #1 — Circle/USDC distribution: Where Arc + USDC expansion routes payments/treasury settlement could shift fee capture between L1s and L2s; watch for where final settlement concentrates.

Catalyst #2 — Solana upgrades: If Alpenglow (faster finality) and Firedancer (high-performance client) deliver, SOL may widen the UX/throughput edge—yet the key question remains whether revenue scales with usage without changing the fee/value mix.

Practical monitoring set: Track (1) stablecoin supply and transfer volume by chain, (2) RWA TVL/issuance venues, (3) L2 batch/settlement patterns, and (4) fee composition by app category (DEX, lending, payments, NFT/meme).

📘 Glossary

Network fees: Payments users make to have transactions processed/confirmed; often reflect demand for block space and settlement.

Per-transaction fee: The average cost of a single transaction; can fall even while total fees rise if usage/value aggregates elsewhere.

Total fee revenue: Sum of all fees collected over a period (24h/7d/30d); used as a monetization proxy.

Settlement layer: The base chain (and its verified finality) where value is ultimately finalized, even if activity originates on L2s or app-specific layers.

Layer-2 (L2): Scaling networks that execute transactions off the main chain and post compressed proofs/data back to the base layer, often concentrating final fee capture at settlement.

Stablecoins: Crypto tokens pegged to fiat (e.g., USD) used for payments, trading, and treasury operations; major driver of onchain economic activity.

RWA (Real-World Assets): Tokenized representations of offchain assets (Treasuries, bonds, commodities) that tend to be larger and compliance-sensitive.

Composability: Ability for onchain apps/protocols to interoperate seamlessly, enabling complex financial workflows.

Finality: Assurance that a transaction is irreversible after confirmation—critical for institutional settlement.

Throughput: How many transactions a network can process per unit time; often central to “traffic layer” strategies.

Firedancer: A high-performance Solana validator client under development aimed at improving performance and resilience.

Alpenglow: A proposed Solana upgrade focused on achieving ultra-fast finality and improved responsiveness.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Chainlink [LINK] has traded within a thin range of $8.5 and $9.9, with $9.9 as upper resistance over the past week. In fact, as of this writing, LINK traded at $9.2 after rising slightly by 1.23% on the daily charts.

However, the altcoin’s trading volume plunged 32% to $649 million, reflecting reduced market participation. Amid this market slowdown, whales have taken the opportunity to reposition themselves, awaiting the next move. 

Chainlink whale moves 1.62 million LINK worth $14.8 million With LINK stuck around $9.2, whales have placed a significant amount of orders around this price level. Spot Average Order Size data from CryptoQuant showed big whale orders of around $9.2 for five out of the past seven days. 

Source: CryptoQuant The increased pile-up around here suggested whale participation, either selling or buying LINK. Lookonchain observed one such whale activity. 

According to the on-chain monitor, a whale created 10 new wallets and withdrew 1.62 million LINK, worth $14.8 million. The whale deposited these tokens into Flowdesk-related deposit addresses. 

However, the monitor reported that these tokens were not recently bought, but the whale was likely reorganizing wallets. Typically, whale reorganization has a negative impact, since it’s neither a selling nor a buying event. 

Besides this whale, other large entities have been recently accumulating, especially when looking at the Exchange Supply Ratio. The ESR has declined for two consecutive months, dropping to January lows, and stood at 0.127 at press time. 

Source: CryptoQuant Usually, a low ESR suggests that most tokens have flowed outside the exchanges, while inflows have declined. Traditionally, such market setups have reduced supply, thereby increasing scarcity, a prelude to higher prices.

Breakout in sight, but risk remains Chainlink showed moderate bullish momentum as the altcoin hovered around $9. The Bulls v. Bears indicator showed that buyers have greater determination to defend higher highs than sellers.

As a result, the altcoin’s Stochastic RSI jumped from 26 to 44 over the past two days, reflecting strong buyer momentum in the market. Often, such market conditions have preceded significant gains, especially when sustained.

Source: Tradingview Therefore, if demand holds while whales stay away from sell-side activity, LINK is likely to finally break out, reclaim $9.9, and flip $10. To achieve this bullish move, bulls need to push the Stoch RSI above 50.

However, sellers, especially retail ones, have remained active, which has held Stochastic RSI back. At the same time, Exchange Netflow also turned positive, rising to 101k, validating this seller’s presence.

Source: Cryptoquant Thus, if sellers remain active, we could see extended sideways movement, with $8.5 as support and $9.9 as immediate resistance.

Final Summary A Chainlink whale created 10 new wallets and withdrew 1.62 million LINK, worth $14.8 million. LINK remained stuck within a tight range, trading between $8.5 and $9.2. 

Bitcoin Depot has named the former CEO of payments giant MoneyGram as its new boss amid mounting regulatory pressure from US states over crypto ATM’s use in scams and money laundering. 

The company said on Tuesday that Scott Buchanan had immediately stepped down as CEO, a role he served in for less than three months after starting on Jan. 1. It added in a regulatory filing that his resignation “was not due [to] a disagreement.”

Bitcoin Depot appointed Alex Holmes, who was already a board member, as CEO and chair. He has held various executive roles, including finance chief and CEO, over a 16-year period at MoneyGram, where he focused on regulatory compliance.

“As I step into the role, my priorities are operational stability, regulatory progress, and accelerating the Company’s evolution into a more diversified fintech platform,” Holmes said in a statement.

Alex Holmes speaking on stage at a fintech conference in 2022. Source: YouTubeThe leadership shake-up comes as Bitcoin Depot has faced legal and regulatory challenges in multiple US states, as crypto ATM operators come under increased scrutiny over the kiosks’ use in scams and money laundering.

Bitcoin Depot said its founder and former CEO, Brandon Mintz, would also transition from executive chair to a non-executive member of the board and would work as an adviser to Holmes.

Multiple US states take action against Bitcoin DepotBitcoin Depot most recently faced state action in Connecticut, whose banking regulator suspended its state money transmission license and issued a temporary cease-and-desist order earlier this month.

The order alleged multiple violations of the state money transmission laws, including excessive fees and incomplete refunds to scam victims.

Bitcoin Depot has also faced action from at least four additional states since early 2025, with Massachusetts’ attorney general suing Bitcoin Depot in early February for allegedly overcharging consumers, knowingly facilitating scams and refusing to issue refunds. 

The company paid $1.9 million to Maine's Consumer Credit Protection Bureau in January to compensate consumers for fraudulent transactions, and Missouri’s attorney general opened an investigation into Bitcoin Depot and four other crypto ATM operators in December over concerns of deceptive fees and use by bad actors.

Iowa also sued Bitcoin Depot and CoinFlip in February 2025 over alleged failures that allowed scammers to transfer millions of dollars through their kiosks.

Bitcoin Depot had lowered its 2026 outlook in its 2025 results released earlier this month, estimating its revenues would be down 30% to 40% due to a “dynamic regulatory environment.”

Shares in Bitcoin Depot (BTM) ended trading on Wednesday down 6.6% to $2.62, but saw a 4.7% bump after the bell to $2.74.

The stock is down 71% so far this year and has fallen more than 94% from its closing all-time high of $45.36 in mid-June.

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum — BIP-360 co-author

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Bitcoin miners entered 2026 facing mounting cost pressure and a rapid shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, according to a new Coinshares report released on Wednesday.

AI Boom Reshapes Bitcoin Mining Sector, Coinshares Report Shows According to the latest bitcoin mining analysis, Q4 2025 marked one of the toughest periods for miners since the April 2024 halving, as bitcoin’s price slid from about $124,500 in October to roughly $86,000 by late December. At the same time, network hashrate remained near record levels, squeezing profitability. The weighted average cash cost to produce one bitcoin climbed to nearly $80,000, leaving many operators near breakeven.

Hashprice, a key revenue metric, dropped to roughly $36 to $38 per petahash per second (PH/s) per day in Q4, then fell further to around $29 in early 2026. Those conditions triggered signs of miner capitulation, including three consecutive negative difficulty adjustments for the first time since July 2022.

Source: Coinshares report on mining. “The weighted average cash cost to produce one bitcoin among publicly listed miners rose to approximately US$79,995 in Q4 2025,” Butterfill said in the report on Wednesday. James Butterfill, head of research at Coinshares, stated the environment reflects “one of the most challenging periods” for miners since the last halving, driven by a combination of price pressure and rising network competition.

Against that backdrop, the industry is increasingly turning toward AI and high-performance computing (HPC) as an alternative revenue stream. Coinshares said publicly listed miners have announced more than $70 billion in AI and HPC-related contracts, with some firms expected to generate up to 70% of revenue from AI by the end of 2026.

The shift reflects a basic economic trade-off: AI infrastructure offers more stable returns than bitcoin mining under current conditions. Still, the transition is uneven. Some companies are aggressively repositioning as data center operators, while others continue prioritizing mining or adopting hybrid strategies.

Source: Coinshares report on mining. Meanwhile, the Bitcoin network itself remains resilient despite recent volatility. Hashrate peaked above 1 zettahash per second in 2025 before pulling back and stabilizing near 1,020 exahash per second. Coinshares expects long-term growth to continue, projecting hashrate could reach 1.8 zettahash by the end of 2026 and 2 zettahash by early 2027.

Geographically, the United States, China and Russia still dominate global mining, accounting for about 68% of total hashrate, while countries like Paraguay and Ethiopia are gaining ground.

Despite the AI pivot, mining economics remain closely tied to bitcoin’s price. The report noted that a recovery toward $100,000 could lift hashprices and improve margins, while prolonged weakness may force more operators offline. For now, the sector appears to be splitting into two camps: traditional miners and hybrid infrastructure firms balancing bitcoin production with AI-driven workloads.

FAQ 🧭 Why are bitcoin miners struggling in 2026?
Lower bitcoin prices and rising hashrate have compressed margins and pushed costs near breakeven. What is hash price and why does it matter?
Hash price measures miner revenue per unit of computing power and directly impacts profitability. Why are miners moving into AI?
AI infrastructure offers steadier returns compared to mining under current market conditions. Will bitcoin mining recover?
Profitability depends largely on bitcoin’s price, with higher prices expected to improve margins.

Bitcoin’s miner supply picture remains tighter than in past cycles, but not tight enough to call it a true supply shock. New data from Axel Adler Jr.’s latest Bitcoin Morning Brief suggests miners still retain a meaningful over-the-counter reserve even as exchange-directed selling pressure stays elevated.

Bitcoin Miners Flash Mixed Signal Adler’s core argument rests on two separate but related indicators. One tracks the 30-day moving average of BTC inflows from miners to exchanges, which serves as a direct proxy for realized selling pressure entering the market. The other measures the aggregate BTC balance held on OTC addresses associated with miners, offering a view into how much inventory can still be sold outside public order books.

Taken together, the charts point to a market that is absorbing ongoing miner distribution, not one that has suddenly run out of hidden supply. As Adler put it, “For the market this is a mixed signal: the hidden OTC overhang is limited compared to past cycles, but tactical pressure in the market channel has not yet been removed.”

That distinction matters. A low OTC balance can be read as constructive because it implies miners have less sidelined inventory available for large off-exchange deals. But if the coins miners are currently producing are still being routed to exchanges at an elevated pace, immediate market pressure remains intact.

The exchange inflow data is central to that argument. According to Adler, miner exchange inflows rose noticeably after Halving #4 relative to the early post-halving period, and the trend accelerated further from autumn 2025 onward. By 2026, the 30DMA remained in what he described as an elevated regime, indicating that “a significant portion of freshly mined supply is still being directed into the market, and current miner pressure cannot be considered removed.”

Bitcoin Miners All Exchange Inflow 30DMA | Source: Axel Adler Recent weeks have shown some moderation from the latest highs, but Adler does not view that as decisive. “In recent weeks the chart shows a local pullback from recent peaks,” he wrote. “But against the backdrop of strong growth over recent months, this does not yet look like a confirmed downward reversal – rather a pause within a still-elevated exchange inflow regime. To speak of a real reduction in miner pressure, a more sustained decline of the 30DMA from the current elevated zone is needed, not a short oscillation within it.”

The OTC side of the picture is more nuanced. Miner-linked OTC balances currently sit around 152.6K BTC, well below the historical peak near 595K BTC in 2018 and only modestly above the series low of roughly 146.9K BTC recorded in July 2025. By long-term standards, that does leave the OTC reserve compressed.

Bitcoin OTC address cohort balance | Source: Axel Adler Still, Adler explicitly pushes back on the idea that the reserve is effectively gone. “The current level is close to the lower bound of the historical range, but claiming the buffer is ‘almost entirely exhausted’ would be an overstatement: more than 150K BTC is still a significant volume,” he wrote. “In recent months the OTC balance has been oscillating within a relatively narrow range, and in February there was even a noticeable upward spike. This looks more like a regime of low but persisting reserve than a final phase of complete buffer depletion.”

That framing is the key to the piece. The report does not argue that miner supply is abundant. It argues that the supply backdrop has become structurally tighter than in earlier cycles without yet crossing into outright scarcity. Miners have “substantially less OTC inventory than in past cycles,” Adler said, but the reserve “has not disappeared.” Instead, it “no longer looks large enough to create the same hidden supply overhang the market could see previously.”

At press time, BTC traded at $

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Venice Token [VVV] has surged 14.37% to $6.40 as trading volume climbs 26.54% to $23.12M, signaling strong demand expansion across the spot market. 

This expansion shows that price is not drifting upward but rather advancing through strong spot demand. 

As participation increases, the rally reflects conviction instead of low-liquidity spikes. The VVV price increase toward $6.40 highlights alignment between demand and price action. 

However, volume expansion at this stage also suggests that traders are reacting to the breakout rather than anticipating it. 

As a result, this phase often defines whether continuation can hold or begin to fade under pressure.

VVV breaks free as structure shifts upward Price has broken out of the pennant flag, ending the prior compression phase and shifting structure toward expansion. 

The breakout places immediate resistance at $6.68, while a broader target forms near $8.50 if continuation holds. 

Besides, the former consolidation region around $5.14 now acts as a key support base. This transition reflects a shift from indecision into directional control. 

However, price now approaches resistance zones where sellers may respond. As a result, holding above the breakout zone remains critical. 

If price maintains this structure, the breakout could extend, but failure to hold support would quickly weaken the setup.

The MACD structure shows that bullish strength has not fully aligned with price action. 

The indicator has not crossed above the signal line, which limits confirmation of sustained upside pressure. 

Additionally, the histogram has turned negative, reflecting weakening strength after the breakout. 

This divergence highlights a gap between structural expansion and internal strength. However, price continues holding above key levels, suggesting that buyers still defend the move. 

As a result, the current setup reflects early-stage expansion rather than fully confirmed continuation. 

Source: TradingView CVD divergence exposes underlying sell pressure Spot Taker CVD remains sell-dominant over the past 90 days, revealing persistent aggressive selling beneath the rally. 

This structure indicates that market participants continue executing sell orders even as price rises. 

However, price has not declined, which suggests that larger buyers may be absorbing this supply. 

This divergence highlights a key imbalance between visible selling and hidden demand. As a result, the rally depends on continued absorption to sustain upward movement. 

If selling pressure intensifies without matching demand, the structure could weaken. However, as long as price holds, this absorption continues supporting the current trend.

Source: CryptoQuant Open interest rise shows leveraged buildup into VVV breakout Open interest has increased by 18.74% to $43.21M, reflecting growing participation in derivatives markets. 

This rise shows that traders are positioning aggressively as price breaks out of consolidation. However, leveraged positioning introduces volatility, especially near resistance zones. 

As positions build, the market becomes sensitive to rapid price movements in either direction. This setup often leads to sharp expansions once liquidity gets triggered. 

At the same time, rising open interest without strong confirmation from other indicators increases risk. 

If price continues higher, these positions could fuel continuation, but any reversal would quickly unwind these leveraged trades.

Source: CoinGlass
VVV has broken out with strong volume support, which strengthens its bullish structure. However, weakening MACD signals and persistent sell pressure create underlying tension. 

The rally can sustain if buyers continue absorbing supply and hold above $5.14. If that support fails, the breakout would likely weaken quickly under pressure.

Final Summary  VVV surged 14% to $6.40, backed by a 26% jump in Spot Volume. Breakout above the pennant shifted the structure from consolidation to expansion. Open Interest rose 18%, signaling aggressive leveraged positioning. Rising leverage increases the risk of sharp moves, especially near resistance

The US White House has completed its review of the proposal to allow cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC) and private equity exposure in 401(k) retirement plans.

The proposal now awaits formal ruling from the Department of Labor (DOL). A positive ruling would support the flow of $13.9 trillion from defined-contribution plans, such as 401(k), into cryptocurrency investments. 

This development would further reinforce the legitimacy of the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry, possibly driving higher demands and breaking recent price consolidation in favor of a bullish reversal.

Bitcoin inclusion in retirement portfoliosThe clearance from White House comes after an August 2025 executive order asking the DOL to ease restrictions on alternative assets. The latter spans private equity, real estate,  infrastructure, commodities, and cryptocurrencies.

While Bitcoin inclusion in 401(k) plans is already legal under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, a positive review from the DOL would shift the DOL’s crypto stance away from “extreme care.”

By contrast, the former Biden administration warned against integrating cryptocurrency into retirement plans, saying volatility could wipe out entire funds and threaten economic stability.

This stance shifted in May 2025 in line with the Trump administration’s aspirations to make America a global hub for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency.

The move to integrate Bitcoin and crypto into retirement portfolios has elicited divergent reactions within the community. Supporters highlight increased accessibility to high-yield digital assets, with financial gains offsetting inflationary effects on the value of fiat.

The #1 barrier to #Bitcoin adoption just crumbled. The Labor Department’s new rule means your employer can finally offer you Bitcoin without fearing a lawsuit. By opening the $13T 401(k) market, the government is making Digital Scarcity a core pillar of the American Dream. This…

— RayDAR.Sol (@RayDARdotSol) March 25, 2026 Critics note that uptake may be lower because retirement firms prioritize stable gains over speculative ones or illiquid investments like private equity.

What happens next?Currently, the DOL maintains a neutral stance on the inclusion of crypto in retirement plans. Once it issues its upcoming ruling, a public commentary period would follow, and thereafter a final ruling.

A positive verdict would provide legal protection to fiduciaries, preventing them from being investigated or sued for including Bitcoin.

Nonetheless, the integration may take some time as retirement firms assess the benefits of such investments and develop the necessary infrastructure to support them.

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Traditional finance and blockchain technology are converging faster than ever, and a new partnership between BitGo and ZKsync is set to accelerate that shift. The two companies are joining forces to deliver a comprehensive, compliance-ready infrastructure that enables banks to bring tokenized deposits onto blockchain rails — without stepping outside existing regulatory boundaries.

At the heart of the collaboration is ZKsync's Prividium, a permissioned and privacy-preserving blockchain network built specifically for regulated entities. Paired with BitGo's industry-trusted institutional custody and wallet services, the combined stack gives financial institutions everything they need to issue, transfer, and settle tokenized deposits securely and efficiently. Rather than building complex onchain systems from scratch, banks can now plug into a ready-made solution designed with their compliance requirements in mind.

Tokenized deposits are quickly gaining traction as a practical alternative to stablecoins for banks exploring blockchain-based payments. The key difference is significant — while stablecoins typically operate outside the traditional banking system, tokenized deposits keep funds firmly within it. This distinction allows institutions to leverage programmable transaction capabilities without triggering changes to the regulatory frameworks they already operate under, making adoption far less disruptive.

ZKsync creator Matter Labs is positioning Prividium as the bridge between public blockchain innovation and the privacy and permissioning demands of institutional finance. CEO Alex Gluchowski described tokenized deposits as the mechanism through which banks can bring money onchain while remaining fully within the regulatory system — a framing that speaks directly to what risk-conscious financial institutions need to hear.

The partnership is already moving beyond the concept phase. Both companies confirmed the joint infrastructure is currently being tested with regulated financial institutions, with a broader production rollout planned for later this year. As more banks look to modernize payment infrastructure, this collaboration signals that blockchain adoption in traditional finance is no longer a question of if — but when.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Bitcoin remains locked in a tight range, leaving traders uncertain about its next major move. With strong resistance overhead and key support still holding below, the market is approaching a decisive moment. Whether BTC breaks out into a new rally or slips into another leg down will largely depend on how it reacts around these critical levels.

A Slips Below Key Zone: Downside Pressure Builds According to Kamile Uray, Bitcoin is currently trading below the key blue box zone, suggesting that downside pressure may persist in the near term. Despite this, the 4-hour chart is beginning to show early signs of a potential recovery structure, with a small inverse head and shoulders (TOBO) forming. If this pattern activates, it could open the door for a move toward the $75,000 level.

Beyond that, there is also the possibility of a larger cup and handle formation developing. A successful push toward $75,000 would help shape this structure, but confirmation would only come with a strong close above that level. If achieved, it could signal continuation to the upside, especially if Bitcoin breaks above the $79,354 level, marking the first higher high on the 4-hour timeframe.

Source: Chart from Kamile Uray on X On the downside, several key support levels, such as $65,666, $62,433, and $60,000, will be closely monitored, as holding above these levels could provide a base for another upward move. However, a daily close below the $62,433–$60,000 range would increase bearish pressure, exposing deeper support levels around $55,230 and $47,256.

Looking at the bigger picture, a move toward $98,200 followed by a daily close above it would confirm a higher high on the daily chart, strengthening the case for a continued uptrend. Caution is advised, however, if the price approaches the $107,000–$109,000 zone, where a potential bearish pattern could emerge. Failure to break above the previous high in that region may trigger another downward phase.

Bitcoin Stuck In Range As Momentum Stalls Bitcoin is currently trading around $70,413, remaining stuck within the same tight range that has held price action in place for weeks. CyrilXBT pointed out that the $72,000–$76,000 zone continues to act as a strong ceiling, with every rally into that area being met by consistent selling pressure. 

On the downside, the macro trendline near $64,000 has held on two separate occasions, providing the only meaningful support structure preventing a broader bearish shift. Still, confidence in a bullish continuation remains limited until Bitcoin can secure a convincing close above $75,000. With the EMA 200 at around $86,380, still far from being relevant at this stage, the market remains in a wait-and-see phase, with traders watching for a decisive move out of the range.

BTC trading at $71,484 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

Ethereum is trading near $2,150, sitting just below the key technical and psychological level of $2,300. Standard deviation models project high volatility, with a potential ceiling at $5,300 and extreme support at $1,150. The broader crypto market shows a similar structure, suggesting an imminent joint resolution for the sector.

Bitcoin finds itself at a critical technical juncture, and price structure — not market sentiment — will likely determine what comes next. After a prolonged correction that pushed the asset well beneath its key moving averages, BTC is now attempting to stabilize, though the broader trend remains bearish. The 50, 100, and 200 EMAs are all sloping downward, each acting as a layer of dynamic resistance above current price levels.

What has shifted, however, is how buyers are responding at local support. For the first time in months, Bitcoin is printing higher lows along a clearly defined rising trendline. This structural change is meaningful — it signals that selling pressure is gradually losing its grip. Rather than continuing to collapse on each dip, price is being absorbed, suggesting accumulation may be quietly underway.

This dynamic is creating a tightening range. Bitcoin is now compressed between rising trendline support from below and the declining EMA cluster above. When price contracts this way, a decisive breakout becomes inevitable — and the direction of that breakout will likely set the tone for the weeks ahead.

A sustained hold above the rising trendline, followed by a clean push through the 50 EMA, would mark a meaningful shift in momentum. It would not immediately confirm a full trend reversal, but it would open the door to testing higher resistance zones and could trigger broader recovery sentiment across the market.

On the flip side, if the trendline fails, the recent higher lows get invalidated. That scenario would likely send Bitcoin back toward lower support levels and extend the existing downtrend.

The setup is clear-cut. Traders and investors should focus on confirmation over assumption — the trendline is the line to watch.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) has launched an institutional-grade Ethereum (ETH) staking platform dubbed 'MAVAN', a move the company says positions it as the world’s largest single Ethereum staker and signals intensifying competition for 'institutional demand' in on-chain yield products.

The U.S.-based blockchain infrastructure firm announced the official rollout of MAVAN—short for 'Made in America Validator Network'—on March 25. As of 5:00 p.m. ET on March 24, BMNR held 3,142,643 ETH, which the company valued at roughly $6.8 billion using a Coinbase-referenced Ethereum price of $2,148. Based on that balance, BMNR said it has become the largest single entity staking Ethereum globally.

BMNR’s accumulation accelerated into the launch. Over the prior week, the firm staked an additional 101,776 ETH, adding more than $219 million in ETH exposure at the same reference price. The company said that if it stakes its full ETH inventory through MAVAN, it expects annual revenue of about $300 million—an estimate that hinges on network-level staking yields, validator performance, fees, and potential changes in Ethereum’s broader staking economics.

The announcement comes as staking shifts from a retail-dominated activity toward a more professionally managed corner of the market. For institutions, staking has increasingly been framed as a way to seek 'native yield' on long-term crypto holdings, but the trade-offs—custody design, slashing risk, operational uptime, and regulatory posture—have pushed demand toward platforms that can offer stronger controls and compliance assurances. BMNR is leaning into that narrative with MAVAN’s U.S.-based validator positioning, emphasizing security and a compliance-forward operating model targeted at large allocators.

Investors backing BMNR include Cathie Wood’s ARK Investment Management and Pantera Capital, providing the company with recognizable institutional endorsements as it scales its staking business. Still, BMNR’s equity remains volatile, underscoring the market’s tendency to treat crypto-linked stocks as high-beta proxies for underlying token prices and sentiment.

BMNR’s market capitalization is about $9.5 billion, with shares recently trading around $21.24, far below the stock’s 52-week high of $161. The sharp drawdown highlights the sensitivity of publicly listed crypto infrastructure firms to shifting expectations around token prices, yields, and the durability of revenue models tied to on-chain activity.

Beyond Ethereum, BMNR said it intends to expand MAVAN into other Proof-of-Stake networks, aiming to capture a broader slice of the 'liquidity inflow' moving into staking across multiple ecosystems. The company also said it is pursuing post-quantum technology initiatives, reflecting a growing industry focus on long-horizon security assumptions as quantum computing research advances.

With MAVAN now live, market attention is likely to focus on whether BMNR can sustain validator performance at its new scale, manage concentration and operational risks, and translate headline staking volume into more stable earnings—factors that could ultimately shape how investors price the company’s role in the evolving institutional staking landscape.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

TL;DR:

The resolution of the Ripple case and the CFTC’s classification of XRP as a “digital commodity” eliminate years of legal uncertainty, finally allowing for massive institutional capital entry. The launch of XRP ETF products aims to replicate the success of Bitcoin and Ethereum, facilitating access for regulated investors without the need for direct asset custody management. Analysts point out that the convergence of regulatory clarity and new investment vehicles positions the asset for a move toward $5.5, surpassing its previous all-time high of $3.65. After years of litigation, the regulatory uncertainty for the Ripple ecosystem has seemingly come to an end. With the SEC and CFTC finally aligning on its classification as a digital commodity, XRP is now entering a robust legal framework that is transforming the perception of major investors.

In market terms, the immediate goal is to break through the psychological barrier of $3.65, the asset’s previous all-time high. With strengthening capitalization and rising trading volume, analysts are closely watching the RSI on weekly charts to confirm the sustainability of this bullish trend.

Institutionalization and the Path to $5.5 The introduction of XRP ETFs adds a fundamental layer of liquidity that was previously absent. Much like with Bitcoin and Ethereum, these financial instruments allow institutional capital to flow in a regulated manner, removing technical and legal barriers to entry.

However, despite the optimism, market reality dictates that macroeconomic factors will drive volatility. The path to new highs is unlikely to be linear, potentially featuring consolidation phases and technical pullbacks necessary to flush out excess leverage in the derivatives market.

In summary, XRP has fundamentally changed its market structure; it no longer operates in a regulatory “gray area.” The convergencia between its technological utility and institutional backing positions the token in a state of maturity unprecedented in its history.

Ripple [XRP] is back in the spotlight, and this time the narrative centers on utility. Ripple’s Singapore expansion, its MAS-linked pilot, and the market’s fast reaction pushed XRP into the market’s discourse. Therefore, the question is simple: is this just another headline pop or the start of something more enduring?

Ripple expands its regulated footprint in Singapore Ripple had already secured broader approval from the Monetary Authority of Singapore to expand payment activities under its Major Payment Institution license. That gave the firm more room to offer token-based settlement services and related payment rails in a market that had become central to its Asia-Pacific strategy.

This mattered because Singapore was not handing out credibility for free. Ripple’s local entity gained wider permissions to serve banks, fintechs, and crypto firms using XRP, RLUSD, and similar rails. However, that was more than a licensing update. It pushed Ripple further into a market that still took rules seriously.

Ripple has been in Singapore since 2017, and no other region has grown as quickly for the firm. Singapore wasn’t just a backdrop; it became one of Ripple’s most important proving grounds, a place where the company could advance real utility.

XRP Ledger and RLUSD in cross-border trade flows The bigger shift came through MAS’s BLOOM initiative. Ripple joined the program with Unloq to pilot programmable trade settlement using Unloq’s SC+ infrastructure, Ripple’s technology, the XRP Ledger, and RLUSD.

The pilot targeted one of finance’s toughest challenges: cross‑border trade settlement, which for years has remained slow, fragmented, and painfully inefficient. Under this model, payments were released only after pre-agreed commercial conditions were met, such as shipment verification.

Therefore, this was not another vague blockchain promise. It tested whether digital settlement assets could actually reduce friction and improve trade finance access, especially for SMEs. In particular, that gave XRP’s utility case something it often lacked: a real-world framework with rules attached.

Could Singapore become a real utility catalyst? The market reacted quickly, and it did not do so quietly. XRP’s volume surged from $2.1 billion to $3.6 billion, at press time, while the price recovered from $1.38 to $1.42 as traders responded to the developments.

Source: CoinMarketCap Rising volume alongside climbing prices signaled strong bullish participation Still, attention alone meant nothing.

XRP had seen excitement before, and much of it died fast. Looking ahead, Singapore could become a real utility catalyst, but failure to do so would mean this move would end up as just another temporary spike.

Final Summary Ripple’s Singapore push gave XRP a harder, more credible utility narrative than the market usually gets. The real test now lies in whether regulated pilots turn into sustained transaction demand.

Leading cryptocurrencies were range-bound on Wednesday, while stocks closed higher as investors weighed de-escalation prospects in the Middle East war.

Crypto Market ConsolidatesBitcoin traded sideways between $70,380 and the mid-$71,000s, with trading volume down 13% over the past day.

Ethereum also meandered in the $2,100 region as bullish momentum stalled against strong resistance at $2,200. XRP and Dogecoin also consolidated.

Over $150 million in crypto positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours, with $100 million in short positions alone wiped out,  according to Coinglass data.

Open interest in Bitcoin futures rose a further 2.66% in the last 24 hours, while the majority of retail and whale traders on Binance staying long on the leading cryptocurrency.

"Extreme Fear" prevailed in the market, according to the Crypto Fear & Greed Index.

Top Gainers (24 Hours) 

The global cryptocurrency market capitalization stood at $2.44 trillion, following a slight increase of 0.50% from the previous day.

Stocks Rally On Ceasefire HopesStocks bounced back on Wednesday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 305.43 points, or 0.66%, and closed at 46,429.49. The S&P 500 climbed 0.54% to 6,591.90, while the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite gained 0.77% to close at 21,929.83

Crude prices rose, with West Texas Intermediate futures trading up 1.03% to $91.23 per  barrel as of 9 p.m. EDT.

Accumulation Phase Incoming?Widely followed cryptocurrency analyst and trader Ali Martinez noted that Bitcoin’s % Realized Cap for new investors has plunged to a significant low, adding that “weak hands” have officially exited the market.

Bitcoin Realized Cap is an on-chain metric that values each BTC in circulation at the price it was last moved rather than the market price.

"When the speculative interest supply dries up, we are left with a market composed of high-conviction holders. This historically marks the transition from a cooling period to the next major accumulation phase," Martinez added.

Michaël van de Poppe, another prominent market commentator, also highlighted "capitulation" of short-term holders.

They cited Glassnode’s Short-Term Holder Net Unrealized Profit/Loss metric, noting its alignment with the 2020 COVID crash and the June 2022 Terra Luna collapse.

"Historically, this has proven to be a great time to buy assets, as markets are always higher 12 months after such a capitulation event," Van De Poppe projected.

Photo: KateStock / Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

Global markets ended the session split along unusual lines as a sharp round-trip in oil prices failed to dictate broader risk sentiment, while Bitcoin (BTC) and gold strengthened as preferred hedges amid intensifying Middle East uncertainty.

The whipsaw was triggered after reports that Iran swiftly rejected a 15-point ceasefire proposal presented by the United States, undermining hopes for a rapid de-escalation and pushing crude into extreme intraday volatility. U.S. equities and Treasury bonds, however, largely ‘looked through’ oil’s late rebound, closing according to their own technical and positioning dynamics rather than headline-driven energy moves.

Market attention shifted quickly from an initial ‘risk-on’ reaction—oil down and stocks up in after-hours trading—to renewed concern as Iran’s rhetoric hardened even after fresh reports of strikes near the Bushehr nuclear power facility. Iranian officials reiterated that the timeline for ending the conflict would be decided by Tehran, dampening expectations that diplomacy would quickly cap escalation risks.

Prediction market pricing reflected that skepticism. On Polymarket, the implied probability of a ceasefire before the end of April failed to rise meaningfully despite the U.S. proposal, signaling traders were reluctant to fade the geopolitical premium being priced into energy and volatility markets.

In oil, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures fell roughly 6% to 7% from the prior session’s highs before recovering most of the decline by the close. Key intraday catalysts included early reports of Iran rejecting the ceasefire plan, a mid-session spike that briefly pushed WTI to an intraday peak near $90 per barrel, and later headlines that President Trump is expected to visit China on May 14–15—news that some traders interpreted as a potential diplomatic off-ramp, helping stabilize crude before prices swung again on renewed war-related commentary.

U.S. equities finished modestly higher, but the gains were largely concentrated in the initial gap move following the ceasefire headline. Once the regular session began, major indices churned sideways and struggled to clear key technical resistance levels. Small caps outperformed on a relative basis, while the S&P 500 logged its sixth consecutive session with an intraday range of at least 1%, underscoring the market’s fragile footing.

Goldman Sachs’ trading desk said overall volumes were down about 3% versus the prior two weeks, while ETFs accounted for roughly 37% of tape activity—an indication that flows, rather than high-conviction discretionary risk-taking, were dominating price action. The bank noted hedge funds were net buyers concentrated in technology, financials, and consumer discretionary, while long-only managers leaned toward industrials, consumer staples, and healthcare.

Nomura’s Charlie McElligott framed the session as a symptom of broader paralysis. He pointed to ‘macro volatility compression’ turning into career risk, skepticism toward quick conflict resolution, weakening labor indicators, structural labor-market shifts tied to AI adoption, and growing concerns around private credit liquidity—all contributing to what he described as an environment where many investors are effectively unable to trade with confidence.

Treasury markets, meanwhile, decoupled from oil. Yields declined even as crude clawed back losses, with the 30-year yield down about 4 basis points and the 2-year down around 2 basis points, signaling demand for duration as a hedge against both geopolitical risk and growth uncertainty. A weak 5-year auction did little to alter the broader bid for bonds. Inflation expectations, as measured by breakevens, fell on the day.

Rate-cut pricing in the U.S. remained restrained, with markets still reflecting limited conviction in imminent easing and comparatively more sensitivity to upside inflation risks. In contrast, expectations in the U.K. and euro zone tilted slightly more dovish, suggesting investors see a clearer path for policymakers there to support growth if conditions deteriorate.

Crypto and precious metals stood out as the session’s clearest winners. Bitcoin (BTC) climbed to around $72,000 intraday before easing back to close near the $71,000 level. Gold extended a rebound from its 200-day moving average and attempted to push above $4,600 per ounce during the session. Notably, it was the first day since the outbreak of war that Bitcoin underperformed gold on a relative return basis, highlighting that markets were treating ‘hard’ defensive assets with renewed seriousness as geopolitical outcomes looked increasingly binary.

The U.S. dollar started weaker but firmed steadily through the session to finish near the prior day’s highs, reflecting a familiar pattern of initial risk repricing followed by renewed demand for liquidity and reserve currency exposure as headlines worsened.

Adding to the macro tension, U.S. import and export price data came in well above expectations, a result some analysts attributed partly to rising RAM prices. Outside the oil shock, the broader set of real-economy signals continues to look less supportive for equities, reinforcing concerns that earnings and valuations may be vulnerable if growth slows while inflation remains sticky.

Goldman Sachs strategist Shriti Kapa said the MSCI World Index is down roughly 7% since the outbreak of war in the Middle East—a meaningful move, though still limited in a longer historical context. However, she warned that equity valuations are higher than they were ahead of the 2022 energy shock and that the equity risk premium is close to zero. In what she described as a ‘binary’ risk environment, she argued that flexibility matters more than conviction—making ‘cash’ a practical advantage until uncertainty clears and investors can redeploy capital with better visibility.

For now, the session’s cross-asset message was stark: oil remains the volatility engine, but the market’s defensive bid is increasingly showing up in Bitcoin (BTC), gold, and long-duration Treasuries—and the next decisive move will likely depend less on technicals than on whether diplomacy can credibly alter the conflict’s trajectory.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

🔎 Market Interpretation

Cross-asset split: Oil saw extreme intraday swings, but broader risk markets (U.S. equities and Treasuries) did not mechanically follow crude’s late rebound, suggesting positioning/technicals outweighed single-headline energy moves.

Geopolitics as the main volatility vector: Reports Iran rejected a U.S. ceasefire proposal and subsequent escalation rhetoric kept a geopolitical risk premium embedded in energy and volatility pricing.

Defensive assets led: Bitcoin and gold strengthened as “hard” hedges, while long-duration Treasuries rallied (yields down), signaling demand for protection against both conflict escalation and growth uncertainty.

Equity tape looked fragile: Stocks ended modestly higher but churned sideways after the open; the S&P 500 recorded another ≥1% intraday range day, indicating unstable market footing.

Liquidity preference returned: The U.S. dollar dipped early but firmed into the close—consistent with a pattern of initial risk repricing followed by renewed demand for liquidity as headlines deteriorate.

Macro backdrop remains uncomfortable: Hotter-than-expected U.S. import/export prices and falling inflation breakevens reinforced “sticky inflation vs slowing growth” concerns, limiting confidence in near-term rate cuts.

💡 Strategic Points

Expect oil-driven volatility, not oil-led direction: Intraday crude spikes (down ~6–7% then back; peak near ~$90) can amplify volatility without reliably dictating equity/bond closes—risk frameworks should separate “volatility impulse” from “trend signal.”

Hedging is rotating toward hard defensives: The session’s clearest defensive bid appeared in BTC, gold, and duration, implying investors may be diversifying hedges beyond USD-only or oil-only expressions.

Watch prediction markets for regime shifts: Polymarket’s muted rise in ceasefire probability suggests traders are unwilling to fade the geopolitical premium—changes here could precede repricing in oil, vol, and risk assets.

Positioning/flows matter more than conviction: Goldman noted lower volumes and high ETF share (~37%), pointing to flow-led price action—risks of sharp, non-fundamental swings remain elevated.

Rates signal defensive duration demand: Falling 30Y (~-4 bps) and 2Y (~-2 bps) yields despite oil’s recovery indicates Treasuries are being used as a hedge against tail risks and growth downdrafts.

Regional policy divergence: U.S. easing expectations stayed restrained, while U.K./euro zone pricing turned more dovish—relative rates could become a key driver of FX and global equity leadership.

Valuation risk in a binary environment: With MSCI World down ~7% since the war began and equity risk premium near zero (per Goldman), “cash/flexibility” may be strategically valuable until conflict and inflation paths clarify.

Key near-term catalysts to monitor:

Credible diplomatic progress (or lack thereof) that changes the conflict trajectory

Further strikes/headlines around critical infrastructure

Inflation-linked data that shifts rate-cut probability

Market internals: breadth, small-cap relative strength, and repeated wide intraday ranges

📘 Glossary

WTI (West Texas Intermediate): A leading U.S. crude oil benchmark used in futures markets.

Breakeven inflation: The inflation rate implied by the yield difference between nominal Treasuries and inflation-protected securities (TIPS); a market-based inflation expectation proxy.

Duration: A measure of bond price sensitivity to interest-rate changes; “long duration” typically benefits most when yields fall.

Risk-on / risk-off: Shifts in investor preference toward higher-risk assets (stocks, high beta) versus defensive assets (Treasuries, gold, cash).

Technical resistance: A price level where an asset historically struggles to rise above, often influencing trader positioning and momentum.

ETF tape activity: The share of total market trading volume attributable to exchange-traded funds, often associated with systematic or flow-driven moves.

Equity risk premium (ERP): The extra return investors demand for holding equities over risk-free assets; a low/near-zero ERP implies limited compensation for equity risk.

Macro volatility compression: A period where major macro variables (rates, FX, commodities) show reduced realized volatility, which can abruptly reverse during shocks.

Prediction markets (e.g., Polymarket): Markets where prices reflect implied probabilities of real-world events, often used as a sentiment/probability gauge.

TL;DR:

Market Performance: Bittensor (TAO) records a 90% rally this month, significantly outperforming Bitcoin amid a structural capital rotation. Volume Metrics: TAO’s monthly trading volume exceeded $5.7 billion in the first quarter, its highest level to date. Network Activity: This growth is not merely speculative; Bittensor subnets are showing a real increase in AI computation and integration. AI is consolidating as the highest-growth sector in the crypto market. In this regard, Bittensor (TAO) is the leader of this trend, capitalizing on the flow of assets that was previously concentrated in Bitcoin.

$TAO ripped 75%+ in a month.

The Subnets? Moving even harder.

10 Bittensor Subnets worth watching

↓

1️⃣ Chutes (SN64)

– 400,000+ users, 9.1T tokens processed
– 85% cheaper than AWS
– First-ever $100M Bittensor subnet

2️⃣ Targon (SN4)

– $10.4M projected annual revenue
-… pic.twitter.com/w9HIUVjwrJ

— Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) March 24, 2026 In a positive context, the TAO/BTC pair rose 78%, implying that at least 70% of the capital entering Bittensor comes from direct BTC sales. While Bitcoin struggles to stay near $80,000 with an RSI showing exhaustion, TAO demonstrates unprecedented relative strength.

This rotation does not appear to be a fleeting “hype” phenomenon. Unlike other cycles, the price increase in Bittensor (TAO) is aligned with an uptick in activity across its subnets, which execute distributed AI computing tasks.

Furthermore, data from Token Terminal reinforces this thesis. While Bitcoin volume shows weakness at the close of Q1, institutional and retail interest in decentralized AI infrastructure positions TAO as a growth haven amidst geopolitical uncertainty.

The Role of Subnets in Bittensor Adoption Consequently, the Bittensor ecosystem is proving that real utility can sustain high valuations. Analysts observe that the migration of more than 14,000 BTC from short-term wallets to exchanges is a clear sign of capitulation that directly benefits AI narratives.

Ultimately, TAO’s success could mark the beginning of a new capital flow pattern for the remainder of the year. If the network maintains its level of technical adoption, Bittensor will cease to be a “trendy altcoin” and become the barometer for modern digital infrastructure.

In summary, the combination of solid fundamentals, record trading volume, and Bitcoin’s relative weakness has created the perfect scenario for AI to lead the next financial quarter.

NEW YORK, March 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) between July 23, 2025 and February 3, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important May 4, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Boston Scientific common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Boston Scientific class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55398 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 4, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants made positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Boston Scientific’s U.S. Electrophysiology segment; notably, that management was aware that the segment’s growth rate was unsustainable and that it was approaching an earlier tipping point than the market was anticipating. Due to defendants’ statements of confidence and lofty expectations, investors and analysts were left surprised by Boston Scientific’s net income miss and underwhelming guidance for the first half of fiscal 2026. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Boston Scientific class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55398 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - March 25, 2026) - Couloir Capital is pleased to announce that it has updated its research coverage on Abcourt Mines Inc. (TSXV: ABI) (or "Company"). Couloir Capital's Mining Analyst, Tim Wright, MSc, CFA, crafted a report titled "Sleeping Giant ramp-up gains traction; Glencore deal de-risks balance sheet; maintain BUY.

This year has been a pretty wild ride for the stock market so far. Both Nvidia (NVDA +1.95%) and Alphabet (GOOG +0.14%)(GOOGL +0.14%) are down this year.

Alphabet has tumbled 6.6% this year while Nvidia is down 6.38%.

You might think this looks like a good buying opportunity, and you'd be right. But which dip should you consider buying?

Image source: Getty Images

Spelling it out Alphabet looks like the stronger of the two from where I'm standing. Financially, both companies are doing quite well, but Alphabet is in the stronger position in terms of the broader AI market. It not only threatens Nvidia's hardware dominance but the rising stars of ChatGPT and Claude as well.

Nvidia became the most valuable company in the world by market cap due to its hardware.

All of the major artificial intelligence (AI) software companies use Nvidia's graphics processing unit (GPU) to some degree.

But many companies, namely OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, are looking to move toward custom hardware more in tune with the needs of AI specifically.

Today's Change

(

0.14

%) $

0.39

Current Price

$

289.59

Nvidia is still on the top of the AI hardware heap, but it has a few companies nipping at its heels, namely Broadcom and Advanced Micro Devices.

And Broadcom has partnered with Alphabet to develop the tensor processing unit (TPU), which represents a direct challenge to the GPU in AI deployments.

Not only is Alphabet lessening its own dependence on Nvidia hardware, Anthropic, OpenAI's main rival, is eagerly adopting the TPU. It's looking to bring 1 gigawatt of computing capacity online with TPU chips by the end of 2026 .

It's early, but it seems that the AI hardware is more easily replaced than software. Clearly, Anthropic's Claude runs just as well if not better on a TPU than a GPU. And both Claude and Google's Gemini (an Alphabet entity) have been gaining market share rapidly.

That means Alphabet likely has a wider moat than Nvidia, and it's the one you should consider buying on the current-year dip. It has both a hardware competitor to Nvidia's GPU and a software competitor to OpenAI and Anthropic.

James Hires has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

WuXi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. (WXXWY) Q4 2025 Earnings Call March 25, 2026 8:00 AM EDT

Company Participants

Chris Chen - CEO & Executive Director
Ming Tu - CFO & Executive VP
Lina Fan - Senior VP & Head of Investor Relations

Conference Call Participants

Laurence Tam - Morgan Stanley, Research Division

Presentation

Laurence Tam
Morgan Stanley, Research Division

Good morning, everyone, for those based in China and Hong Kong, and good evening to those -- sorry, good evening to those who are based in China and Hong Kong, and good morning to those who are based in the U.S. Welcome to the 2025 WuXi Bio Earnings Results for 2025. This call will be conducted in English. My name is Laurence Tam, China Healthcare Analyst at Morgan Stanley.

Tonight, we're honored to have the management team of WuXi Bio present to us their 2025 annual results. We have Dr. Chris Chen, who is the CEO of WuXi Bio; Mr. Tu Ming, CFO of WuXi Bio; Dr. Lina Fan, the Head of IR team; and Wallis Wu, also part of the WuXi Bio IR team.

The call will last for 1 hour and 15 minutes. There will be prepared remarks from management followed by a Q&A session. Investors can type their questions into the Zoom Q&A box at the bottom of the window, or you can e-mail me your questions at [email protected].

With that, I will pass it on to Chris to give us an overview of 2025 results.

Chris Chen
CEO & Executive Director

Thank you, Laurence. It's great to give a global investor update for 2025. Yes. I think we believe we have a very unique business model called CRDMO. I think we're benefiting from all 3 exciting modalities of bi- and multispecifics, ADCs and traditional mAbs. So I think this combined exciting business model with all those 3

March 25, 2026 20:58 ET  | Source: Archrock

HOUSTON, March 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Archrock, Inc. (NYSE: AROC) (“Archrock” or the “Company”) today announced that Douglas S. Aron, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, has informed the Company of his intention to retire by the end of 2026 or when a successor is named. The Company has engaged an executive search firm to assist with the identification and evaluation of potential successors.

“Doug has been a valued partner and critical member of our leadership team during a period when Archrock has transformed its business and meaningfully improved its balance sheet and profitability,” said Brad Childers, President and Chief Executive Officer. “We are grateful for his many contributions and are well prepared for the next chapter with a strong leadership team and clear strategy in place,” concluded Childers.

“I want to thank the Board, Brad, and the incredibly talented team across Archrock for their trust, partnership, and commitment over the last eight years,” said Aron. “As I look ahead, I am committed to helping Archrock with a successful transition and I am excited to prioritize time with family. I look forward to continuing to follow Archrock’s future success,” concluded Aron.

About Archrock

Archrock is an energy infrastructure company with a primary focus on midstream natural gas compression and a commitment to helping its customers produce, compress and transport natural gas in a safe and environmentally responsible way. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Archrock is a premier provider of natural gas compression services to customers in the energy industry throughout the U.S. and a leading supplier of aftermarket services to customers that own compression equipment. For more information on how Archrock embodies its purpose, WE POWER A CLEANER AMERICA™, visit www.archrock.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or actions. Forward-looking statements rely on a number of assumptions concerning future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. Archrock expressly disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. A further list and description of risks, uncertainties and other matters can be found in Archrock’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, and as set forth from time to time in Archrock’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings are available online at www.sec.gov and www.archrock.com.

For information, contact:

Megan Repine
VP of Investor Relations
281-836-8360
[email protected]

March 25, 2026 21:00 ET  | Source: Partners Value Split Corp.

TORONTO, March 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Partners Value Split Corp. (the “Company”, TSX: PVS.PR.H, PVS.PR.J, PVS.PR.K, PVS.PR.L, PVS.PR.M, PVS.PR.U, PVS.PR.V) announced today its financial results for the year ended December 31, 2025. All amounts are in the United States dollar ("US dollar").

Income available for distribution for the year ended December 31, 2025, was $94 million compared to $85 million in the prior year. The increase in income was primarily due to the increase in the dividend rate by Brookfield Corporation (“BN”, NYSE/TSX: BN) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (“BAM”, NYSE/TSX: BAM). Net comprehensive income of $1.3 billion decreased compared to the prior year primarily due to lower unrealized mark-to-market gains on BN and BAM shares.

As at December 31, 2025, the market prices of a BN and BAM share were $45.89 and $52.39, respectively. As at March 25, 2026, the market prices of a BN and BAM share were $39.91 and $43.69, respectively.

Net asset value per unit consists of one preferred share and one capital share. The net asset value per unit is posted monthly on our website at www.partnersvaluesplit.com.

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the years ended December 31
(Thousands of US dollars, except per unit amounts)  2025   2024 Income    Dividend income $93,203  $83,728 Other investment income  1,537   1,265    94,740   84,993 Expenses    Management fees  (17)  (18)Administrative and other  (372)  (352)   (389)  (370)Income available for distribution  94,351   84,623 Distributions paid on senior preferred shares and debentures  (34,308)  (31,011)Income available for distribution to junior preferred and capital shares  60,043   53,612 Change in realized and unrealized value of investments  1,338,434   2,491,751 Amortization of share issuance costs  (3,928)  (3,211)Foreign exchange gain (loss)  (45,499)  72,344 Net comprehensive income $1,349,050  $2,614,496 Comprehensive income per unit1 $25.44  $53.64 
1 The weighted average number of units outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2025, was 53.0 million (December 31, 2024 – 48.7 million). Quarterly distribution rate per senior preferred shareLocal currency20252024   –  Class AA, Series 10CAD0.29380.2938   –  Class AA, Series 12CAD0.27500.2750   –  Class AA, Series 13CAD0.27810.2781   –  Class AA, Series 14CAD0.34380.3438   –  Class AA, Series 15CAD0.3219N/A   –  Class AA, Series 16USD0.3375N/A   –  Class AA, Series 17USD0.3281N/A 
As at December 31, 2025, the Company owned 179 million Class A Limited Voting shares of BN, and 25 million Class A Limited Voting Shares of BAM, which together generate cash flow through dividend payments that fund quarterly fixed cumulative preferential dividends for the holders of the Company’s preferred shares and provide the holders of the Company's capital shares the opportunity to participate in any capital appreciation of the Brookfield shares.

Brookfield Corporation is a leading global investment firm focused on building long-term wealth for institutions and individuals around the world. BN has three core businesses: alternative asset management, wealth solutions, and its operating businesses which are in renewable power, infrastructure, business and industrial services, and real estate. BN is publicly traded in New York and Toronto (NYSE: BN, TSX: BN). The Company’s investment in BN represents approximately an 8% interest in BN.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a leading global alternative asset manager, headquartered in New York, with over $1 trillion of assets under management across renewable power and transition, infrastructure, private equity, real estate, and credit. BAM invests client capital for the long-term with a focus on real assets and essential service businesses that form the backbone of the global economy. BAM offers a range of alternative investment products to investors around the world — including public and private pension plans, endowments and foundations, sovereign wealth funds, financial institutions, insurance companies and private wealth investors. BAM draws on Brookfield’s heritage as an owner and operator to invest for value and generate strong returns for its clients, across economic cycles. BAM is publicly traded in New York and Toronto (NYSE: BAM, TSX: BAM). The Company’s investment in BAM represents approximately a 2% interest in BAM.

For further information, contact Investor Relations at (416) 359-8534.

Notice to Readers

The Company is not making any offer or invitation of any kind by communication of this news release and under no circumstance is it to be construed as a prospectus or an advertisement.

This news release contains “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian provincial securities laws and any applicable Canadian securities regulations (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future results, events or conditions, and include, but are not limited to, statements which reflect management’s current estimates, beliefs and assumptions regarding the operations, business, financial condition, expected financial results, performance, prospects, opportunities, priorities, targets, goals, ongoing objectives, strategies, capital management and outlook of the Company, as well as the outlook for North American and international economies for the current fiscal year and subsequent periods, and which are in turn based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. The estimates, beliefs and assumptions of the Company are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies regarding future events and as such, are subject to change. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “foresee”, “could”, “estimate”, “goal”, “intend”, “plan”, “seek”, “strive”, “will”, “may” and “should” and similar expressions. In particular, forward-looking statements contained in this news release includes statements with regard to the generation of cumulative preferential dividends for the holders of the Company’s preferred shares and potential participation by the holders of the Company’s capital shares in the capital appreciation of Brookfield Shares.

Although the Company believes that such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable estimates, beliefs and assumptions, actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forward‐looking statements and information include, but are not limited to: the financial performance of Brookfield Corporation, the impact or unanticipated impact of general economic, political and market factors; the behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest and foreign exchanges rates and heightened inflationary pressures; limitations on the liquidity of our investments; global equity and capital markets and the availability of equity and debt financing and refinancing within these markets; strategic actions including acquisitions and dispositions; changes in accounting policies and methods used to report financial condition (including uncertainties associated with critical accounting assumptions and estimates); the effect of applying future accounting changes; business competition; operational and reputational risks; technological change; changes in government regulation and legislation; changes in tax laws; risks associated with the use of financial leverage; catastrophic events, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and epidemics/pandemics; the possible impact of international conflicts and other developments including terrorist acts and cyberterrorism; failure of our information and technology systems; developments in artificial intelligence; and other risks and factors detailed from time to time in the Company’s documents filed with the securities regulators in Canada.

We caution that the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive and other factors could also adversely affect future results. Readers are urged to consider these risks, as well as other uncertainties, factors and assumptions carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which are based only on information available to us as of the date of this news release and such other date specified herein. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, that may be as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Past performance is not indicative nor a guarantee of future results. There can be no assurance that comparable results will be achieved in the future, that future investments will be similar to historic investments discussed herein, that targeted returns, or growth objectives will be met or investment objectives will be achieved (because of economic conditions, the availability of appropriate opportunities or otherwise).

Shares of Braze (BRZE +20.87%) spiked on Wednesday after the artificial intelligence (AI)-powered customer engagement platform reported solid growth metrics.

Image source: Getty Images.

AI-driven expansion Braze helps marketers deploy AI models and agents to better connect with their clients and deliver more personalized experiences. Demand for these AI services is booming.

Braze's revenue jumped 28% year over year to $205 million in its fiscal 2026 fourth quarter, which ended on Jan. 31. The gains were fueled by new business wins and upsells to existing customers.

Today's Change

(

20.87

%) $

3.76

Current Price

$

21.78

Braze's customer count expanded by 14% to 2,609. And those with annual recurring revenue (ARR) of at least $500,000 climbed 35% to 333.

"The world's largest and most sophisticated brands are choosing Braze as a foundational partner to drive their AI transformation during this period of intense disruption and opportunity," CEO Bill Magnuson said.

Braze's adjusted operating income, in turn, soared 83% to $14.5 million.

Healthy sales momentum Management expects the company's revenue to grow to between $884 million and $889 million in fiscal 2027, up from $738 million in fiscal 2026. Braze also projects adjusted operating income of $69 million to $73 million, up from $28.5 million.

Recently expanded partnerships with data analytics leader Snowflake, e-commerce giant Shopify, and digital ad platform The Trade Desk should help to fuel Braze's growth.

"We begin this fiscal year with strong commercial momentum and the fastest pace of new product delivery in our history," Magnuson said.

Joe Tenebruso has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Braze, Shopify, Snowflake, and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 25, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNO) between March 26, 2025 through November 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 5, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Soleno common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Soleno class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43959 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 5, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Soleno Phase 3 clinical trial program for diazoxide choline extended-release tablets ("DCCR") had systematically downplayed, misrepresented, and/or concealed significant evidence of safety concerns potentially related to the administration of DCCR, including issues related to excess fluid retention in clinical trial participants; (2) as a result, the administration of DCCR to treat hyperphagia in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome ("PWS") posed materially greater safety risks than disclosed by Soleno or its executives; and (3) as a result, DCCR had materially lower commercial viability and undisclosed risks related to the likelihood of significant and widespread adverse events after its commercial launch, including risks related to patient discontinuation rates, lower patient adoption, prescriber reluctance, adverse regulatory action, and potential reputational and legal fallout. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Soleno class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43959 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289963

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us