Market Signal Briefing

S&P 500 Remains Strong as Bitcoin Slides to a 1-Year LowUS equities advanced toward record highs, driven by strong earnings, AI stocks, and improving market breadth.Bitcoin fell below $65,000, hitting a one-year low as capital rotated away from crypto toward profit-backed assets.The divergence highlights a clear risk split, with investors favoring earnings visibility over liquidity-driven trades.US equities rebounded as the S&P 500 climbed to $6,976, before correcting. Earlier in the week, the benchmark index closed just shy of its prior record before briefly moving higher in subsequent trading, while risk appetite in equities contrasted sharply with continued weakness across crypto markets.

At the same time, Bitcoin continued to underperform, with selling pressure accelerating as broader capital flows favored traditional risk assets. The divergence has become more pronounced in recent sessions, reinforcing the growing split between equity and crypto sentiment.

S&P 500 Year-to-Date ChartSponsored

Sponsored

AI Stocks and Small Caps Drive Equity MomentumThe latest leg higher in the S&P 500 was led by large-cap technology and semiconductor stocks, as investors rotated back into AI-linked names after a brief pause driven by valuation concerns. 

Alphabet rose to a new record, Amazon advanced ahead of earnings, and chipmakers posted broad-based gains as demand expectations firmed.

Beneath the surface, market breadth also improved. Small-cap stocks outpaced megacaps, with the Russell 2000 gaining around 3% year-to-date. 

That relative strength is often interpreted as a signal of confidence in domestic growth and has added support to broader stock market predictions that point to continued upside as long as earnings momentum holds.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Earnings, Not Valuations, Now Anchor the RallyCorporate results remain the central driver of the market’s advance. Analysts now expect S&P 500 companies to deliver close to 11% earnings growth for the December quarter, up sharply from estimates earlier in January. 

More than 80% of reporting firms have exceeded expectations so far, according to FactSet data cited by market strategists.

Recent research suggests earnings growth has accounted for roughly 84% of total S&P 500 returns in the current cycle, marking a shift away from multiple expansion as the primary engine of gains. This transition has softened concerns around an AI-driven bubble, as profits and cash flow increasingly justify higher prices.

GS: S&P 500 year/year EPS growth is tracking at +11%, 4ppt above the +7% rate that consensus expected at the start of earnings season. pic.twitter.com/9DC2qkAbgJ

— Mike Zaccardi, CFA, CMT 🍖 (@MikeZaccardi) January 31, 2026 Macro Backdrop Keeps Risk Appetite IntactThe broader macro environment has so far supported equity risk-taking. US GDP growth remains near 3.3%, inflation trends are relatively contained, and productivity indicators have improved. Even political disruptions, including a federal government shutdown that delayed key data releases, failed to dent market confidence materially.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Major US indices posted solid gains alongside the S&P 500, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising more than 1% YTD. But the Nasdaq Composite dropped roughly 2.6%. 

Dow Jones Year-To-Date ChartInvestors now look ahead to upcoming economic data and the Federal Reserve’s next policy signals for confirmation that financial conditions will remain supportive.

Bitcoin Weakness Highlights Cross-Market DivergenceWhile equities pushed higher, crypto markets moved in the opposite direction. Bitcoin price dropped below $65,000, marking its lowest level in roughly a year and extending a broader downtrend that has weighed on digital assets. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

The decline has come amid fading momentum, reduced speculative appetite, and capital rotation toward equities offering visible earnings growth.

The contrasting performance reflects a growing divergence between traditional risk assets and crypto, at least in the near term. 

While both markets can benefit from liquidity-driven rallies, current conditions favor assets tied more directly to corporate profits.

Bitcoin 7-Day Price Chart. Source: CoincodexOutlookThe S&P 500’s move to new highs reflects a rally increasingly grounded in earnings delivery rather than expanding valuations. AI investment, small-cap strength, and resilient macro data continue to support the upside case, even as record levels invite selective caution.

Bitcoin’s slide to a one-year low highlights where risk appetite is thinning, but for now, equity markets remain firmly in control of the broader risk narrative.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Delays to highly anticipated crypto legislation contributed to XRP’s retreat as hopes for the Market Structure Bill passing in Q1 faded.

Thursday’s sell-off reaffirmed a near-term bearish trend reversal. Nevertheless, the medium-term outlook remains cautiously bullish. Expectations that the Senate will eventually pass crypto-friendly legislation and increased utility remain crucial to XRP’s longer-term price trajectory.

Below, I will explore the key drivers behind recent price trends, the medium-term (4-8 weeks) outlook, and the technical levels traders should watch.

US Labor Market Data Impacts Sentiment On February 5, US initial jobless claims and JOLTs job openings signaled a marked weakening in labor market conditions, weighing on risk appetite. Jobless claims increased from 209k (week ending January 24) to 231k (week ending January 31). More significantly, JOLTs job openings tumbled from 6.928 million in November to 6.524 million in December, while quit rates rose to 3.204 million (November: 3.193 million).

Rising jobless claims clashed with a slump in job openings, suggesting higher unemployment. Quit rates underscored waning confidence among US workers, another negative metric for the labor market and the US economy. Typically, rising unemployment impacts wage growth and consumer confidence, curbing consumer spending. A pullback in spending would weigh on the US economy, given that private consumption accounts for roughly 65% of GDP.

Notably, XRP slid from $1.3620 to a low of $1.1220 after the release of the labor market reports.

XRPUSD – 5 Minute Chart – 060226 While concerns about the US economy triggered the sell-off, Amazon.com’s spending plans added to the selling momentum. The company announced plans to spend $200 billion on CAPEX in 2026, topping a consensus of $146 billion.

AI-related spending has been a market focal point, given ongoing concerns about returns on investment. High spending offers no guarantee of returns, particularly as investors must wait years, not months, to see any benefits in a dynamic backdrop.

AI developments have added a layer of uncertainty about the longer-term, leaving markets to question the sizable CAPEX announcement. Notably, Amazon.com plunged 11.2% in after-hours trading in reaction to the news. Ahead of the announcement, AMZN closed the February 5 session down 4.42%.

Earlier this week, XRP price action underscored sensitivity to AI-related headlines, exposing the token to corporate America.

US Senate Eyes Q2 Market Structure Bill Vote While US economic indicators and AI-related headlines influenced near-term trends, crypto-related legislative developments remain key to XRP’s medium- to long-term price outlook.

On February 5, Senator Cynthia Lummis stated that a Senate vote on the Market Structure Bill was now slated for spring 2026. The banking community’s push to block Stablecoin yields over concerns about losing deposits and the crypto community’s requirement for yields stalled the Market Structure Bill in January, weighing on XRP.

Stablecoin yields are likely to be significantly higher than US bank deposit rates. Banks have argued that stablecoin yields could result in an exodus of deposits from TradFi to DeFi. Depositors are key to US banks’ profitability. Typically, US banks pay depositors low interest but charge significantly higher lending interest rates, driving net interest margins and profits.

For context, the US Senate Banking Committee postponed its January 15 markup vote after Coinbase (COIN) withdrew its support for the Banking Committee’s draft text for the Market Structure Bill. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong cited several reasons for withdrawing its support, including concerns that the Banking Committee’s text would kill rewards on stablecoins and allow banks to ban their competition.

XRP rallied from a December 31 low of $1.8103 to a January 6 high of $2.4151 after the Banking Committee announced its markup date. However, delays to the Banking Committee’s markup have contributed to XRP’s plunge to sub-$1.15 levels.

Despite the delays, analysts expect the banking and crypto communities to reach an agreement on stablecoin yields, supporting the bullish medium-term outlook for XRP.

XRPUSD – Daily Chart – 060226 – Market Structure Bill Effect XRP Price Forecast: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Targets The extended sell-off supported the negative short-term outlook (1-4 weeks), with a target price of $1.0.

However, resilient demand for XRP-spot ETFs, hopes for multiple Fed rate cuts, expectations that the Market Structure Bill will progress, and increased XRP utility continue to support the bullish medium- to long-term price projections:

Medium-term (4-8 weeks): $2.5. Longer-term (8-12 weeks): $3.0. Key Downside Risks to the Bullish Medium-Term Outlook Several events could challenge the constructive bias. These include:

A hawkish Bank of Japan, with a higher neutral interest rate (potentially 1.5%-2.5%). Multiple BoJ rate hikes could narrow US-Japan rate differentials and trigger a yen carry trade unwind, as seen in mid-2024. A yen carry trade unwind would validate the bearish trend reversal. Weak US economic data and rising US recession risks. Delays and/or partisan opposition to the Market Structure Bill. Extended periods of XRP-spot ETF net outflows. These factors would weigh on XRP demand, pushing XRP toward $1.0 and affirming the bearish short-term outlook.

Technical Analysis: Levels to Watch XRP tumbled 19.59% on Thursday, February 5, following the previous day’s 4.27% loss, closing at $1.2140. The token came under heavier selling pressure than the broader crypto market cap, which dropped 12.69%.

The extended sell-off left XRP trading well below its 50-day and 200-day EMAs, indicating bearish momentum. However, several favorable fundamentals continue to offset bearish technicals, supporting a bullish medium-term outlook.

Key technical levels to watch include:

Support levels: $1.0 and then $0.7773. 50-day EMA resistance: $1.8718. 200-day EMA resistance: $2.2164. Resistance levels: $1.50, $2.0, $2.5, and $3.0. On the daily chart, a breakout above $1.50 would bring the 50-day EMA and $2.0 into play. A sustained move through the 50-day EMA and $2.0 would signal a near-term bullish trend reversal. A bullish trend reversal would enable the bulls to target $2.2. A break above $2.2 would pave the way toward the 200-day EMA.

Significantly, a sustained move through the EMAs would reaffirm the bullish medium-term price targets.

A volatile trading session on February 5 offered a clear example of how quickly narratives can diverge in the crypto market. While most large-cap assets moved lower amid regulatory uncertainty and heavy liquidations, Hyperliquid’s HYPE has posted a 6.2% gain following news of its integration with Ripple’s ecosystem.

At the same time, XRP extended its decline by 10%, weighed down by broader market pressure rather than project-specific developments. The contrast underlined how selective optimism can emerge even during a broad sell-off, especially when tied to infrastructure upgrades or ecosystem expansion.

HYPE's price trends to the downside on the daily chart after recording some gains. Source: HYPEUSD on Tradingview HYPE Rallies After Ripple Integration Hyperliquid’s price moved higher, up 4.23%, after confirmation that the platform had integrated Ripple’s technology stack, a step aimed at improving interoperability and settlement efficiency.

Market participants appeared to interpret the move as a practical enhancement rather than a speculative announcement, helping HYPE outperform a largely bearish market.

The rally came despite worsening sentiment across the sector. Bitcoin traded near $71,000 after a sharp pullback, and total crypto market capitalization fell more than 6% on the day. Against that backdrop, HYPE’s gains stood out as traders rotated into assets linked to near-term network developments rather than macro-driven trades.

While trading volumes in HYPE increased following the announcement, the move remained relatively contained, suggesting measured positioning rather than a surge of speculative leverage.

XRP Slips as Market Weakness Dominates XRP, by contrast, declined alongside other major altcoins. The token fell close to 11% over 24 hours, tracking losses in Ethereum, Solana, and BNB as risk appetite faded.

The drop occurred even as Ripple-related developments supported other parts of the ecosystem, underscoring how broader market conditions continue to outweigh individual catalysts for large-cap tokens.

The sell-off was amplified by derivatives activity. Falling open interest and a rise in forced liquidations across centralized exchanges added to downside momentum, particularly for assets with high leverage exposure. XRP’s move appeared more sentiment-driven than fundamental, reflecting the day’s defensive tone.

Broader Market Context Remains Fragile The divergence between HYPE and XRP played out as investors reacted to stalled discussions around a US crypto market structure bill and ongoing debates over stablecoin regulation. These issues contributed to a spike in volatility and more than $800 million in liquidations, mostly from long positions.

Meanwhile, institutional positioning continued to shift. Grayscale’s recent decision to remove Cardano from its CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF in favor of BNB reinforced the focus on liquidity and market depth, a theme that continues to shape capital flows.

Hyperliquid’s rally indicates that targeted integrations continue to attract interest, despite weakness in the wider crypto market. Its durability, however, will depend on genuine adoption rather than sentiment alone.

Cover image from ChatGPT, HYPEUSD chart on Tradingview

Crypto market sentiment has slumped to its lowest level in over three and a half years amid Bitcoin falling by double-digit percentage points to a low of around $60,000.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell to a score of 9 out of 100 on Friday, indicating “extreme fear” in the market and hitting its lowest point since June 2022, when sentiment and the market fell in the wake of the collapse of the Terra blockchain a month earlier.

The index has been at a low for the last fortnight as Bitcoin (BTC) has tanked 38% from its 2026 high of $97,000 in just three weeks, wiping out all gains for the past sixteen months. 

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index hit a score of 9 out of 100 on Friday as Bitcoin continued to slide. Source: Alternative.meBitcoin falls to $60,000 on Coinbase Bitcoin fell to its lowest level since October 2024 at a little over $60,000 on Coinbase in early trading on Friday morning, according to TradingView.

It is currently trading at just over $64,000 after dumping 13% over the past 24 hours and losing over $10,000 in its largest daily loss since mid-2022.

Bitcoin has now collapsed below the 200-week exponential moving average, a long-term trend indicator, which has only previously happened in the depths of a bear market. It is currently 50% down from its all-time high of $126,000 in early October. 

Over the past 24 hours, more than 588,000 traders were liquidated for $2.7 billion, 85% of them were leveraged longs predominantly in Bitcoin, according to CoinGlass.

BTC falls below 200w EMA to bear market lows. Source: TradingViewTech stock slump and Fed caution behind the crashJeff Ko, chief analyst at CoinEx Research, told Cointelegraph that Bitcoin’s more than 20% drawdown in a week comes alongside a selloff in US tech stocks “where stretched valuations and lingering concerns around an artificial intelligence-driven bubble have long been highlighted by the market.”

“Even Amazon suffered a double-digit decline overnight following a mixed earnings release,” he added. “Investors are increasingly reassessing Bitcoin's failure to function as a safe haven compared to gold.”

LVRG Research director Nick Ruck said Bitcoin’s fall and a broader market decline comes amid “heightened risk aversion” triggered by “softer US job market signals, including rising unemployment claims that raise doubts about sustained economic strength and potential Fed caution on aggressive rate cuts.”

Magazine: DAT panic dumps 73,000 ETH, India’s crypto tax stays: Asia Express

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Ethereum price extended its decline below $2,000 and $1,950. ETH is now attempting to recover from $1,750 but faces many hurdles near $2,200.

Ethereum failed to stay above $2,000 and started a fresh decline. The price is trading below $2,000 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. There is a major bearish trend line forming with resistance at $2,200 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken). The pair could start a fresh decline if it stays below the $2,200 zone. Ethereum Price Dips Over 15% Ethereum price failed to remain stable above $2,200 and extended losses, like Bitcoin. ETH price traded below $2,000 to enter a bearish zone.

The bears even pushed the price below $1,880. A low was formed at $1,744 and the price is now attempting to recover. There was a move above $1,850. The price surpassed the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $2,341 swing high to the $1,744 low.

Ethereum price is now trading below $2,000 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. If the bulls remain in action above $1,800, the price could attempt another increase. Immediate resistance is seen near the $1,950 level. The first key resistance is near the $2,050 level and the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $2,341 swing high to the $1,744 low.

Source: ETHUSD on TradingView.com The next major resistance is near the $2,200 level. There is also a major bearish trend line forming with resistance at $2,200 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD. A clear move above the $2,200 resistance might send the price toward the $2,350 resistance. An upside break above the $2,350 region might call for more gains in the coming days. In the stated case, Ether could rise toward the $2,550 resistance zone or even $2,665 in the near term.

More Losses In ETH? If Ethereum fails to clear the $2,050 resistance, it could start a fresh decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $1,850 level. The first major support sits near the $1,800 zone.

A clear move below the $1,800 support might push the price toward the $1,750 support. Any more losses might send the price toward the $1,720 region. The main support could be $1,680.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for ETH/USD is gaining momentum in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSI – The RSI for ETH/USD is now below the 50 zone.

Major Support Level – $1,850

Major Resistance Level – $2,200

Bitcoin surges back above $65,000 after $700 million wipeout in Asia whipsawBTC fell as much as 4.8% to around $60,033 during late U.S. hours, before snapping back to as high as $65,926. Feb 6, 2026, 3:17 a.m.

Bitcoin rebounded sharply in Asia on Friday after a fresh wave of selling briefly pushed the token toward $60,000, extending a brutal drawdown that has now taken the world’s largest cryptocurrency more than 50% below its October peak.

BTC fell as much as 4.8% to around $60,033 during late U.S. hours, before snapping back to as high as $65,926. The move followed Thursday’s 13% slide, bitcoin’s steepest one-day drop since November 2022, when the collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX triggered a marketwide panic.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW

The bounce came as liquidations surged again, clearing out leveraged positions that had built up during the week’s decline.

Roughly $700 million in crypto bets were wiped out over the past four hours, according to liquidation tracker CoinGlass, including about $530 million in long positions and $170 million in shorts. That mix suggests traders were first crushed on the way down, then caught leaning the wrong way on the rebound.

The move also appears to have drawn in spot buyers, with $60,000 acting as a psychological line that traders have been watching for weeks.

Damien Loh, chief investment officer at Ericsenz Capital, said the rebound points to “strong support” around that level, but warned sentiment remains fragile given the broader market backdrop.

Altcoins mirrored bitcoin’s whipsaw. Solana at one point fell as much as 14% before erasing those losses entirely within hours, shows how quickly risk appetite is flipping as liquidity thins and forced selling takes over.

The broader crypto market has been shaky since a series of liquidations in October rattled confidence, and the latest drawdown has been amplified by turbulence in global markets, where investors have been dumping speculative assets.

Bitcoin’s weakness is now spilling into crypto-linked balance sheets. Strategy, the company led by Michael Saylor, reported a $12.4 billion fourth-quarter net loss on Thursday, driven by mark-to-market declines in its bitcoin holdings.

Even with Friday’s bounce, traders say the market still looks like one being pushed around by leverage rather than conviction.

Bitcoin 'volatility fear gauge' hits FTX-blowup peak as prices crater to nearly $60,000Bitcoin's volatility gauge, the BVIV, spiked to nearly 100%, its highest level since the 2022 FTX collapse. Feb 6, 2026, 3:27 a.m.

Bitcoin's Wall Street-like fear gauge has spiked to its highest level since the collapse of the FTX exchange in 2022, signaling intense market panic as prices plummeted to nearly $60,000.

Volmex's bitcoin volatility index (BVIV), which represents the annualized expected price turbulence over four weeks, jumped to nearly 100% from 56% on Thursday.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW

The index serves as a crypto equivalent to Cboe's VIX, the so-called fear/panic gauge, which indicates the 30-day implied volatility of the S&P 500 and rises during market panics as traders bid up options prices to hedge against declines in the index.

The BVIV does the same more often than not, rising during market panics as observed on Thursday.

"A wave of panic swept through crypto markets this week, correlated to a sharp risk-off move across various asset classes. Bitcoin’s 30-day implied volatility, as measured by the BVIV Index, surged from just over 40 to 95 in a matter of days, levels not seen since the infamous collapse of FTX at the end of 2022," Cole Kennelly, founder and CEO of Volmex Labs, told CoinDesk in a Telegram chat.

Implied volatility is influenced by demand for options, or derivative contracts that help traders make asymmetrical gains from uptrends in the underlying asset and hedge downside risks. Call options are used to bet on the upside, while put options are typically bought as insurance against price drops.

On Thursday, traders scrambled to buy Deribit-listed options, especially puts, as bitcoin's price tanked from $70,000 to nearly $60,000. The top five most traded options of the past 24 hours are all puts at strikes ranging from $70,000 to $20,000, according to data source Deribit Metrics. The $20,000 put represents a bet that prices will fall below that level.

"Volatility markets reacted sharply to last night's price drop. Front-end volatility surged as dealers adjusted for gamma [near-term risks]. Short-dated vols led the surge, showing higher demand for protection, while longer-dated vols lagged, keeping the volatility curve steeply inverted," Jimmy Yang, co-founder of institutional liquidity provider Orbit Markets, told CoinDesk.

Yang's clients rushed to buy downside protection, fearing the price crash could devastate digital asset treasuries that bought bitcoin at higher levels. These firms could now liquidate at a loss, leading to a deeper slide in bitcoin's price.

"With significant uncertainty still ahead — particularly around the DATs and the risk of further unwind cascades, we've seen a lot of client demand for downside protection," he added.

Bitcoin's price has bounced to over $64,000 at the time of writing, an over 5% recovery from overnight lows, according to CoinDesk data. Yang expects volatility to stabilize.

"Sentiment is deep in extreme fear, but bitcoin's price seems to have found a base near $60K. If price action stabilizes, volatility looks stretched and could quickly pull back," he said.

XRP fundamentals are strengthening as institutional infrastructure expands, unlocking new onchain utility and regulated access that could reshape demand even while price action lags amid broader market pressure. XRP Pulls Back While Hex Trust and Flare Build Institutional Utility Layer XRP fundamentals remain increasingly bullish even as short-term price action stays subdued.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG) between January 17, 2025 and November 13, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Plug Power securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Plug Power class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1011 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had materially overstated the likelihood that funds attributed to the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan would ultimately become available to Plug Power, and/or that Plug Power would ultimately construct the hydrogen production facilities necessary to receive those funds; (2) as such, Plug Power was likely to pivot toward more modest projects with less commercial upside; and (3) as a result, Plug Power's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Plug Power class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=1011 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282970

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) M&A Call February 5, 2026 9:00 AM EST

Company Participants

Graham Sones - Vice President of Investor Relations
Robert McKee - CEO, President & Director
Steven L. Green
John Griggs - Executive VP & CFO

Conference Call Participants

John Mackay - Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division
James Rollyson - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division
Douglas Irwin - Citigroup Inc., Research Division
Elias Jossen - JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Neal Dingmann - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, and welcome to Kodiak Gas Services conference call to discuss the announced acquisition of Distributed Power Solutions. [Operator Instructions]

Please note that this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Graham Sones. Please go ahead.

Graham Sones
Vice President of Investor Relations

Hello, and thank you for joining us. Today, we issued a press release announcing that Kodiak has agreed to acquire Distributed Power Solutions. That press release and an accompanying presentation are posted to the Investor Relations section of our website. A few housekeeping items. The comments made by management during this call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of United States federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements reflect the current views, beliefs and assumptions of Kodiak's management based on information currently available.

Although we believe the expectations referenced in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, various risks, uncertainties and contingencies could cause the company's actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in the statements made by management. Management can give no assurance that such statements or expectations will prove to be correct.

We may also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures and metrics. Please refer to Slide 2 in the presentation posted on our website for additional discussion of

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Feb. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. (“West Red Lake Gold” or “WRLG” or the “Company”) (TSXV: WRLG) (OTCQB: WRLGF) announces the grant of stock options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”) in accordance with the Company’s stock option plan (the “Option Plan”), and its RSU/PSU/DSU Plan (collectively with the Option Plan, the “Plans”).

Officers of the Company were granted an aggregate of 4,839,269 stock options vesting over a three year period with 25% vesting in 3 months from the grant date and 25% vesting on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date at an exercise price of $1.10 and will be exercisable for a 5 year period from the date of grant.

In addition, 2,845,503 RSUs were granted to Officers of the Company and 594,594 DSUs were granted to non-executive Directors. The RSUs will vest over three years in three equal tranches on the first, second and third anniversary of the grant date and DSUs will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.

The grant of Stock Options, RSUs and DSUs is subject to regulatory acceptance of the TSX Venture Exchange.

For further information regarding the Plans, readers are encouraged to review the management information circular (the "Circular") prepared for the Company's annual general meeting of shareholders held on June 10, 2025, which includes a summary of the material terms of the Plans. The Circular is available under the Company's profile on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca) and by visiting the Company's website (www.westredlakegold.com).

ABOUT WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES

West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd. is a gold miner development company that is publicly traded and focused on advancing and developing its flagship Madsen Gold Mine and the associated 47 km2 highly prospective land package in the Red Lake district of Ontario. The highly productive Red Lake Gold District of Northwest Ontario, Canada has yielded over 30 million ounces of gold from high-grade zones and hosts some of the world's richest gold deposits. WRLG also holds the wholly owned Rowan Property in Red Lake, with an expansive property position covering 31 km2 including three past producing gold mines - Rowan, Mount Jamie, and Red Summit.

ON BEHALF OF WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES LTD.

“Shane Williams”

Shane Williams        
President & Chief Executive Officer

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:

Shane Williams

Chief Executive Officer

Tel: (604) 609-6132

Email: [email protected] or visit the Company’s website at https://www.westredlakegold.com

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

For more information on the Company, investors should review the Company’s continuous disclosure filings that are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b7b44ed6-345a-4288-b962-b033b799afb9

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

For the quarter ended December 2025, Unum (UNM - Free Report) reported revenue of $3.23 billion, up 0.2% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $1.92, compared to $2.03 in the year-ago quarter.

The reported revenue represents a surprise of -1.13% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.27 billion. With the consensus EPS estimate being $2.11, the EPS surprise was -9.07%.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.

Here is how Unum performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Benefit Ratio - Unum US Group Life and Accidental Death & Dismemberment: 64.8% compared to the 69.7% average estimate based on four analysts.Benefit Ratio - Colonial Life Segment: 48.3% compared to the 47.9% average estimate based on four analysts.Other Expense Ratio - Unum US Supplemental and Voluntary: 22.6% compared to the 22.5% average estimate based on four analysts.Other Expense Ratio - Unum US Group Life and Accidental Death & Dismemberment: 12.3% versus 12.1% estimated by four analysts on average.Revenue- Other income: $80.1 million versus the six-analyst average estimate of $78.22 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +11.3%.Revenue- Net investment income: $482 million compared to the $493.1 million average estimate based on six analysts. The reported number represents a change of -11.3% year over year.Revenue- Premium Income: $2.69 billion versus $2.7 billion estimated by six analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +2.3% change.Adjusted Operating Revenue- Corporate Segment- Net investment income: $17.9 million compared to the $22.05 million average estimate based on five analysts. The reported number represents a change of +29.7% year over year.Adjusted Operating Revenue- Closed Block Segment- Net Investment Income: $237.6 million compared to the $232.62 million average estimate based on five analysts. The reported number represents a change of -20.1% year over year.Adjusted Operating Revenue- Colonial Life Segment- Net Investment Income: $43.5 million versus the five-analyst average estimate of $44.48 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +3.3%.Adjusted Operating Revenue- Unum International Segment- Net Investment Income: $34.7 million versus $36.94 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +1.2% change.Adjusted Operating Revenue- Unum US Segment- Other Income: $63.4 million compared to the $60.92 million average estimate based on five analysts. The reported number represents a change of +11.2% year over year.View all Key Company Metrics for Unum here>>>

Shares of Unum have returned -1.8% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.5% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell), indicating that it could underperform the broader market in the near term.

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (“Ultragenyx” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: RARE) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between August 3, 2023 and December 26, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before April 6, 2026.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Ultragenyx gave investors a falsely optimistic impression of its understanding of the effects of its drug candidate on patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta ("OI"). The Company’s failures were revealed by the Phase III ORBIT study in which it failed to achieve a statistically significant reduction in annualized fracture rate ("AFR"). Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Ultragenyx, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

Amazon's stock plunged 11% in extended trading on Thursday, dragged lower by market jitters around the company's $200 billion capex plans, the highest spending forecast among the megacap companies.

The forecast is a sharp increase from Amazon's capital expenditures last year, and it was more than $50 billion above analysts' expectations. The company reported spending roughly $131 billion on purchases of property and equipment in 2025, up from about $83 billion in the year prior.

Tech companies have laid out aggressive spending plans on artificial intelligence infrastructure since OpenAI ushered in the modern era of this technology with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, but at the start of 2026, those lavish commitments have only kept growing.

Google parent Alphabet on Wednesday said it would spend up to $185 billion in 2026, while Meta last week said its capital expenditures could nearly double from last year to somewhere between $115 billion to $135 billion in 2026

On a conference call with investors, Wall Street analysts pressed Amazon executives for more clarity around the spending blitz and when it could begin to pay off. CEO Andy Jassy said in prepared remarks at the beginning of the call that he was "confident" that company's cloud unit will see a "strong return on invested capital," though he didn't say when it could materialize.

"Help us, get to that — get to your level of confidence in having a strong long term return on that invested capital," Mark Mahaney, Evercore ISI head of internet research, said to Jassy.

Jassy said the company needs the capital to keep pace with "very high demand" for Amazon's AI compute, which requires more infrastructure such as data centers, chips and networking equipment.

"This isn't some sort of quixotic, top-line grab," Jassy said. "We have confidence that we, that these investments will yield strong returns on invested capital. We've done that with our core AWS business. I think that will very much be true here as well."

Sales at Amazon Web Services grew 24% to $35.6 billion in the most recent period, beating analysts' expectations and marking the cloud unit's "fastest growth in 13 quarters," Jassy said.

AWS could've grown faster if it had more capacity to meet demand, "so we are being incredibly scrappy around that," he said.

The company's cloud unit added almost 4 gigawatts of computing capacity in 2025, and AWS expects to double that power by the end of 2027, Jassy noted.

Barclays analyst Ross Sandler asked Jassy how he sees the AI market evolving from the current landscape, where it remains "a bit top-heavy with a lot of the spend clustering around a few of the AI-native labs."

Jassy said the AI market has become more like a "barbell," with the AI labs on one side and enterprises on the other end, looking to the technology as a "productivity and cost avoidance" tool. The middle is comprised of enterprises that are in various stages of building AI applications, he said.

"That middle part of the barbell very well may end up being the largest and most durable," Jassy said.

watch now

, /PRNewswire/ -- 

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of CoreWeave, Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV) between March 28, 2025 and December 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important March 13, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

LOGO (PRNewsfoto/THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.) So what: If you purchased CoreWeave securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the CoreWeave class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50571 mailto:or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 13, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) defendants had overstated CoreWeave's ability to meet customer demand for its service; (2) defendants materially understated the scope and severity of the risk that CoreWeave's reliance on a single third-party data center supplier presented for CoreWeave's ability to meet customer demand for its services; (3) the foregoing was reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on CoreWeave's revenue; (4) as a result, CoreWeave's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the CoreWeave class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50571 or mailto:call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

Amtech Systems, Inc. (ASYS) Q1 2026 Earnings Call February 5, 2026 5:00 PM EST

Company Participants

Robert Daigle - President, Chairman & CEO
Mark Weaver - Interim CFO and Principal Accounting & Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Jordan Darrow - Darrow Associates Inc.
George Marema
Gary DiStefano
Craig Irwin - ROTH Capital Partners, LLC, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Amtech Systems Fiscal First Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. Please note that this call is being recorded and simultaneously webcast. I would now like to turn the call over to Jordan Darrow of Darrow Associates, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Jordan Darrow
Darrow Associates Inc.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for the Amtech Systems Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Conference Call and Webcast. With me today on the call are Bob Daigle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Mark Weaver, Interim Chief Financial Officer. After close of market today, Amtech released its financial results for the first quarter of 2026. The earnings release is posted on the company's website at www.amtechsystems.com in the Investors section.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that the safe harbor disclaimer in our public filings cover this call and the webcast. Some of the comments to be made during today's call will contain forward-looking statements and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those contained in our SEC filings, all of which are posted in the Investors section of our corporate website.

The company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of today. These statements are not a guarantee of future performance, and actual results could differ materially from current expectations.

Among the

NEW YORK, Feb. 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Trip.com Group Limited (NASDAQ: TCOM) resulting from allegations that Trip.com Group Limited may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Trip.com Group Limited securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=50668 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On January 14, 2026, Investing.com published an article entitled “Trip.com stock falls after Chinese regulators launch antitrust probe.” The article stated that Trip.com stock fell after “the Chinese travel service provider disclosed it is under investigation by China’s market regulator for potential antitrust violations.”

On this news, Trip.com American Depositary Shares (“ADS”) fell 17% on January 14, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com

, /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Patria Investments Limited ("Patria" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PAX). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.

The investigation concerns whether Patria and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. 

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

On January 26, 2026, Snowcap Research published a short report alleging that Patria "may be overstating performance and masking losses within its flagship private equity and infrastructure funds." 

On this news, Patria's stock price fell $0.78 per share, or 4.55%, to close at $16.37 per share on January 26, 2026.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Danielle Peyton
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]
646-581-9980 ext. 7980

SOURCE Pomerantz LLP

, /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Snowflake Inc. ("Snowflake" or the "Company") (NYSE: SNOW). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.

The investigation concerns whether Snowflake and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. 

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

On February 28, 2024, Snowflake announced its financial results for the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2024, along with financial guidance for the full fiscal year 2025.  During the accompanying earnings call, Snowflake's management discussed changes in customer behavior and the impact of certain product-related developments, which adversely affected the Company's outlook. 

On this news, Snowflake's stock price fell $41.72 per share, or 18.14%, to close at $188.28 per share on February 29, 2024.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.  

CONTACT:
Danielle Peyton
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]
646-581-9980 ext. 7980

SOURCE Pomerantz LLP

, /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Pharming Group N.V. ("Pharming" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PHAR). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980.

The investigation concerns whether Pharming and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. 

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

On February 1, 2026, Pharming issued a press release "announc[ing] that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL) to its supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) for Joenja® (leniolisib), an oral, selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, as a treatment for children aged 4 to 11 years with activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS), a rare primary immunodeficiency."  The press release said that "[t]he FDA raised an issue with the potential for underexposure in lower weight pediatric patients.  As a result, the FDA has requested additional pediatric pharmacokinetic data to reassess the proposed pediatric doses and confirm that children in the lower weight dose groups can achieve exposure levels comparable to the approved adult and adolescent regimen.  The letter also identified an issue with one of the analytical methods used for production batch testing, and the FDA requested additional data and clarification on this point." 

On this news, Pharming's American Depositary Receipt ("ADR") price fell $3.495 per ADR, or 17.07%, to close at $16.975 per ADR on February 2, 2026.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. 

CONTACT:
Danielle Peyton
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]
646-581-9980 ext. 7980

SOURCE Pomerantz LLP

The exercise equipment company's all-important holiday quarter was a bust.

Shares of Peloton Interactive (PTON 27.24%) plunged on Thursday after the exercise bike and treadmill maker's quarterly results fell short of investors' expectations.

By the close of trading, Peloton's stock price was down more than 25%.

Image source: Peloton Interactive.

Sluggish sales Peloton's revenue fell by $17 million to $657 million in its fiscal 2026 second quarter, which ended on Dec. 31. That was $8 million below management's forecast.

Membership price increases contributed to a 7% year-over-year decline in Peloton's paid connected fitness subscriptions to 2.66 million. Sales of the company's new artificial intelligence (AI)-powered -- yet also more expensive -- equipment failed to offset these revenue declines.

Today's Change

(

-27.24

%) $

-1.61

Current Price

$

4.30

Peloton has been relying on price hikes and cost cuts to boost profitability. The company reportedly laid off 11% of its workforce in late January, according to Bloomberg.

Peloton's expense-reduction initiatives helped its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) improve to $81 million, up from $58 million in the year-ago period.

Still, Peloton produced a net loss of $39 million, or $0.09 per share, based on generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Wall Street had expected a loss of just $0.06 per share.

A lackluster forecast For its fiscal third quarter, Peloton expects its paid connected fitness subscriptions to decline by roughly 8% year-over-year to between 2.650 million to 2.675 million.

Management also guided for revenue to decrease by about 1% to $605 million to $625 million. That was below Wall Street's estimates of $638 million.

Joe Tenebruso has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Peloton Interactive. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV) between October 28, 2024 and October 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important February 17, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased F5 securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the F5 class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=46672 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than February 17, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to F5's projected revenue outlook and anticipated growth while also minimizing risk from seasonality and macroeconomic fluctuations. In truth, F5's optimistic claims, touting its purported best-in-industry security and overall emphasis and confidence in F5's ability to meet and capitalize on the growing security needs for its clientele fell short of reality; F5 was, at the time, the subject of a significant security incident, placing its clientele's security and F5's future prospects at significant risk. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the F5 class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=46672 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/282949

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Q2 2026 Earnings Call February 5, 2026 5:00 PM EST

Company Participants

Martin Lam - Head of Investor Relations
Michael Cannon-Brookes - Co-Founder, CEO & Director
Joe Binz - CFO & Principal Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Robert Oliver - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division
Sanjit Singh - Morgan Stanley, Research Division
Gregg Moskowitz - Mizuho Securities USA LLC, Research Division
Karl Keirstead - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division
Aleksandr Zukin - Wolfe Research, LLC
Ryan MacWilliams - Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Research Division
Jason Celino - KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Research Division
Ittai Kidron - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division
Koji Ikeda - BofA Securities, Research Division
Keith Bachman - BMO Capital Markets Equity Research
Raimo Lenschow - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good afternoon, and thank you for joining Atlassian's earnings conference call for the second quarter of fiscal year 2026. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay on the Investor Relations section of Atlassian's website following this call.

I will now hand the call over to Martin Lam, Atlassian's Head of Investor Relations.

Martin Lam
Head of Investor Relations

Welcome to Atlassian's Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Call. Thank you for joining us today. On the call with me today, we have Atlassian's CEO and Co-Founder, Mike Cannon-Brookes and Chief Financial Officer, Joe Binz.

Earlier today, we published a shareholder letter and press release with our financial results and commentary for our second quarter of fiscal year 2026. The shareholder letter is available on the Investor Relations section of our website, where you will also find our other earnings-related materials, including the earnings press release and supplemental investor data sheet. As always, our shareholder letter contains management's insight and commentary for the quarter.

So during the call today, we'll have

Expense ratios, risk profiles, and fund size set these two gold ETFs apart for investors weighing long-term portfolio fit.

iShares Gold Trust (IAU 2.57%) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD 2.66%) both offer simple access to gold prices, but IAU charges a lower expense ratio, while GLD manages more assets under management (AUM) and has seen less severe historical drawdowns.

Both IAU and GLD are physically backed gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) designed to mirror the price movement of gold bullion, appealing to investors seeking a straightforward way to gain gold exposure without owning the metal itself. This comparison looks at how they stack up on cost, performance, risk, and structure.

Snapshot (cost & size)MetricIAUGLDIssuerISharesSPDRExpense ratio0.25%0.40%1-yr return (as of 2026-02-04)73.1%72.9%Beta0.260.26AUM$80.2 billion$173.3 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

IAU looks more affordable for long-term holders due to its lower expense ratio, while GLD charges a higher fee but commands the largest assets under management (AUM) among gold ETFs.

Performance & risk comparisonMetricIAUGLDMax drawdown (five years)(20.93%)(21.03%)Growth of $1,000 over five years$2,719$2,700What's insideGLD is invested entirely in physical gold, classified under basic materials, and has existed for over 21 years. While holdings data are not detailed, it operates as a pure play on gold bullion, with no sector or company-level tilts, and does not introduce unique quirks or hedges.

IAU also tracks the price of gold through physical holdings and is classified under real estate due to sector mapping conventions, though in practice it behaves as a direct gold proxy. Like GLD, IAU offers no yield and its portfolio is entirely focused on gold bullion, making both funds functionally similar in terms of underlying exposure.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investorsAdmittedly, investors will struggle to find material differences in these funds from just a surface-level comparison. As previously mentioned, both of the funds offer a similar performance over time. Both precious metals ETFs are also similar in terms of time of existence.

Today's Change

(

-2.57

%) $

-2.39

Current Price

$

90.53

GLD is slightly older with a November 2004 inception date. Still, since IAU came into existence in January 2005, BlackRock’s iShares moved quickly to compete with State Street‘s SPDR Gold Shares.

Today's Change

(

-2.66

%) $

-12.09

Current Price

$

441.88

As for significant differences, one that appears meaningful is the expense ratio, with GLD charging 0.40% compared to just 0.25% for IAU.

Indeed, the difference between the expense ratios likely will make little difference in terms of returns, though one may struggle to find a justification to pay an extra 0.15% to hold GLD.

The other major difference, which draws less attention, is assets under management. In that regard, GLD is the clear leader, managing $173.3 billion in assets versus just $80.2 billion for IAU.

Still, both funds have the name recognition and a level of assets under management that should make investors feel comfortable with either fund. Thus, investors are more likely to focus on IAU’s lower expense ratio when comparing the two ETFs.