Market Signal Briefing

Binance (CRYPTO: BNB) founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao said Thursday that while Peter Schiff understands the problems with fiat money, he is too “stubborn” to accept Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) as the solution.

CZ On Viral ‘Trick’In an X post, CZ discussed his debate with Schiff at the Binance Blockchain Week and his viral stunt challenging the Bitcoin critic to prove the authenticity of a gold bar.

“I thought that trick may work. Bitcoin made it easy,” CZ said.

CZ added that while Schiff understands the issues with modern monetary systems, he views Bitcoin primarily as a speculative asset.

“Peter is so close,” the former Binance CEO said. “He hasn't used Bitcoin enough. He is a gentleman though.”

CZ Says Schiff Almost There, But ‘Stubborn’CZ described Schiff as “stubborn” when asked whether he could finally convince the longtime skeptic to accept Bitcoin’s potential.

“But we are actually friends now. Small win,” CZ said.

Schiff’s DefenceMeanwhile, Schiff replied to critics who claimed that he lost the debate convincingly, stating, “You just hear what you want to hear. Confirmation bias.”

See Also: Can DOGE & SHIB Still Hit $10? One Can — Here’s The Simple Answer Why

Bitcoin Vs. GoldThe keenly-awaited debate saw CZ challenge Schiff to authenticate a gold bar on stage, a task Schiff admitted he couldn’t perform without equipment.

CZ said this was done to highlight the trust required in traditional assets like gold, compared to the instant verification offered by Bitcoin’s ledger.

While Schiff acknowledged Bitcoin’s transparency, he said that this alone does not make it money, emphasizing gold’s real-world demand in manufacturing, electronics and other sectors.

Price Action: At the time of writing, BTC was exchanging hands at $92,619.99, up 1.27% in the last 24 hours, according to data from Benzinga Pro. Spot gold was trading at $4,207.05 per ounce, down 0.% over the last 24 hours

Read Next: 

If You’re Expecting A Bitcoin Bear Market In 2026, You Have It Wrong, Grayscale Says – Benzinga
Photo Courtesy: bitz100 on Shutterstock.com

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

TLDR

Table of Contents

TLDRExpansion into Telegram Ecosystem and Cocoon AI NetworkCocoon AI and Blockchain Development PlansCapital Deployment and Recent MovesGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks

AlphaTON Capital filed for a $420.69 million shelf registration with the SEC to fund growth in the TON ecosystem.
The firm plans to invest in Telegram’s Cocoon AI network and increase its acquisitions within the TON ecosystem.
AlphaTON CEO Brittany Kaiser highlights the flexibility provided by the shelf registration for business growth.
The firm deployed Nvidia B200 GPUs to Cocoon AI to generate a new revenue stream.
AlphaTON is also focused on acquisitions, including a deal for 60% of GAMEE and plans for a TON Mastercard launch.

AlphaTON Capital Corp, a Nasdaq-listed firm, filed a $420.69 million shelf registration with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Thursday. The filing marks a shift for the firm, which was previously constrained by the SEC’s “baby shelf rules.” This funding will support AlphaTON’s expansion into the TON token market and Telegram’s Cocoon AI network.

Expansion into Telegram Ecosystem and Cocoon AI Network
Announced by the GlobeNewswire, AlphaTON aims to use the funds to grow its investments in the Telegram ecosystem. This includes enhancing its stake in TON tokens and participating in Telegram’s recently launched Cocoon AI network. The firm also intends to increase its acquisitions within the Open Network (TON) ecosystem, focusing on companies in blockchain-enabled services, content distribution, and payments.

Brittany Kaiser, CEO of AlphaTON, stated, “Exiting the SEC’s ‘baby-shelf’ limitations on raising capital marks an important milestone.” She further emphasized that this funding will give AlphaTON the flexibility to move quickly on business opportunities. The firm sees its growth as a crucial step in providing infrastructure for decentralized AI.

Cocoon AI and Blockchain Development Plans
Cocoon AI, Telegram’s decentralized platform for AI computing, has just launched and is already gaining attention. The platform rewards users with Toncoin for renting out their GPUs to process queries. AlphaTON recently deployed Nvidia B200 GPUs to Cocoon AI, which is expected to generate a new revenue stream.

The Open Network blockchain, used by Telegram’s mini apps, has seen increasing adoption. AlphaTON, with its strong backing, is positioning itself to be a leading infrastructure provider for AI-based decentralized services. The TON blockchain is popular for its integration with Telegram Messenger, which helps fuel user engagement and app growth.

Capital Deployment and Recent Moves
In addition to the shelf registration, AlphaTON plans to use the capital to build its TON token treasury. This funding will support the company’s broader strategy, including acquisitions of companies within the TON ecosystem. The firm’s recent investments reflect its focus on growing its business and making strategic acquisitions.

AlphaTON also amended its deal to acquire 60% of mobile gaming platform GAMEE. The firm is set to invest up to $4 million in GMEE and Watcoin tokens in the open market. Another key initiative is the upcoming launch of a co-branded TON Mastercard in partnership with PagoPay and ALT5 Sigma.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bitcoin has climbed back above $93,000 after enduring days of intense selling pressure, heightened volatility, and widespread market uncertainty. The recovery marks a significant shift in sentiment, but according to a new report from CryptoQuant, one signal stands out as the primary driver behind the rebound: institutional capital is quietly flowing back into the market.

The analysis highlights a key metric— the Coinbase Premium Index, long regarded as a reliable proxy for US institutional demand. Throughout November’s steep correction, the premium plunged deep into negative territory, revealing a stark imbalance: US spot buyers were far weaker than their offshore counterparts.

During this phase, as Bitcoin slid below $90,000, the sharp drop in the premium reflected clear risk-off positioning among US-regulated investors, many of whom stepped back or took profits amid rising macro uncertainty.

Now, with Bitcoin recovering key levels, the data shows early signs of renewed accumulation from US-based institutions. This subtle but meaningful shift suggests that the most conservative segment of the market—professional and regulated capital—may be positioning again after the correction. If this trend continues, the rebound above $93K could evolve into a much broader shift in market structure.

Institutional Catalysts Drive Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Higher
According to the CryptoQuant report, the narrative has shifted decisively. The Coinbase Premium Index has climbed back into positive territory, signaling renewed accumulation from US-based institutional and regulated investors. This shift coincides with a wave of major developments reshaping the global investment landscape.

Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Index | Source: CryptoQuant
Most notably, Charles Schwab, a $12 trillion asset manager, announced plans to offer Bitcoin and Ethereum trading in early 2026. This follows Vanguard’s market-moving reversal that opened access to spot crypto ETFs for more than 50 million conservative investors. These firms are not speculative players—they are the backbone of American retirement wealth.

At the same time, a powerful but less publicized catalyst is emerging overseas: Japan is moving toward formal approval of Bitcoin ETFs. Given the size of Japanese investment trusts, pension-linked products, and retail participation, early adoption could inject $3–10 billion of fresh demand. While no single region drives Bitcoin’s valuation alone, combined flows from the US, Europe, and Japan could easily deliver a mid-single-digit percentage uplift to BTC in the early phases of this expansion.

The broader takeaway is unmistakable: Bitcoin is transitioning from a niche risk asset into a globally standardized investment product. The return of a positive Coinbase Premium may be the market’s earliest confirmation that institutions—especially the most conservative ones—are positioning ahead of 2026.

Weekly Structure Shows Early Signs of Recovery
Bitcoin’s weekly chart shows a decisive rebound, with price pushing back above $93,000 after weeks of aggressive selling pressure. The recent wick down toward the green 100-week moving average (100W MA) marked a key moment: buyers stepped in precisely at long-term dynamic support, preventing a deeper breakdown toward the $80,000–$82,000 region.

This reaction confirms that long-term holders and institutional buyers are protecting this level, aligning with the recent return of positive signals from the Coinbase Premium Index.

BTC Holding Key Weekly Support | Source: BTCUSDT chart on TradingView
Despite the rebound, the chart still shows Bitcoin facing overhead resistance. The 50-week MA sits just above the price, creating a supply zone between $97,000 and $102,000. This has historically acted as a trend-determining range; reclaiming it would shift momentum decisively back to the bulls. Until then, the market remains in a mid-cycle consolidation.

Volume behavior also supports the recovery narrative. The huge sell-volume spikes seen in November marked capitulation-like behavior, which often precedes trend reversals. The recent green weekly candle forming on rising buy volume suggests that demand is returning, aligning with improving liquidity conditions on major US and global exchanges.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter!
For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.

Sebastian's journey into the world of crypto began four years ago, driven by a fascination with the potential of blockchain technology to revolutionize financial systems. His initial exploration focused on understanding the intricacies of various crypto projects, particularly those focused on building innovative financial solutions. Through countless hours of research and learning, Sebastian developed a deep understanding of the underlying technologies, market dynamics, and potential applications of cryptocurrencies.
As his knowledge grew, Sebastian felt compelled to share his insights with others. He began actively contributing to online discussions on platforms like X and LinkedIn, focusing on fintech and crypto-related content. His goal was to expose valuable trends and insights to a wider audience, fostering a deeper understanding of the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. Sebastian's contributions quickly gained recognition, and he became a trusted voice in the online crypto community.
To further enhance his expertise, Sebastian pursued a UC Berkeley Fintech: Frameworks, Applications, and Strategies certification. This rigorous program equipped him with valuable skills and knowledge regarding Financial Technology, bridging the gap between traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi). The certification deepened his understanding of the broader financial landscape and its intersection with blockchain technology.
Sebastian's passion for finance and writing is evident in his work. He enjoys delving into financial research, analyzing market trends, and exploring the latest developments in the crypto space. In his spare time, Sebastian can often be found immersed in charts, studying 10-K forms, or engaging in thought-provoking discussions about the future of finance.
Sebastian's journey as a crypto analyst and investor has been marked by a relentless pursuit of knowledge and a dedication to sharing his insights. His ability to navigate the complex world of crypto, combined with his passion for financial research and communication, makes him a valuable asset to the industry. As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, Sebastian remains at the forefront, providing valuable insights and contributing to the growth of this revolutionary technology.

The Base-Solana bridge has officially gone live on mainnet, according to an announcement shared via Base’s official X page. It marks a major step forward in cross-chain interoperability between Base and Solana. 

With the bridge in place, users can enjoy seamless, bidirectional asset transfers from Solana to Base, and vice versa, without needing to rely on centralized exchanges or third-party intermediaries.

What’s the Base—Solana bridge?
According to Base’s official X page, the Base-Solana bridge, which makes it easy for anyone to move assets across both ecosystems, is secured by Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), via a bespoke cross-chain oracle, alongside Coinbase. 

Coinbase and Chainlink CCIP are node operators, each independently verifying all messages in a bid to ensure all token transfers between Base and Solana are safe and reliable.

The rollout is happening on multiple apps, including Zora, AerodromeFi, Virtuals, Flaunch, and RelayProtocol, and is available for anyone to use.

Users will also be able to trade and use Solana assets on Base natively, and this covers not only standard tokens like  $SOL, but also memecoins like $CHILLHOUSE, $TRENCHER, and many more. 

The move is ultimately designed to unlock unified liquidity pools across both ecosystems, allowing users to trade, deploy, and interact with assets from either chain in a single environment.

Base’s official announcement aligns with its core vision of being a “bridge rather than island” and an “everything economy,” where “every asset, across every network, [is] available at any time.” 

On the other side of the bridge, the Solana network has become the first chain to get connected via this infrastructure, though there are plans in the pipeline for expansions to other networks like Avalanche and Polygon. 

“By leveraging Chainlink CCIP as the cross-chain infrastructure securing the Base-Solana Bridge, Base enables developers to build the most secure cross-chain applications and move the industry toward a reliable interoperability standard that is adopted by the largest financial institutions in the world,” said Johann Eid, Chief Business Officer at Chainlink Labs. “This is how onchain finance scales to securely support global markets and the hundreds of trillions in value they represent.” 

Base chain facilitated JPMorgan bridge with DeFi
Given its lofty goal of being the “everything economy,” the recent moves have been on brand for Base. It just announced the bridge between Solana and Base, but weeks before that, it played a big role in helping JPMorgan Chase & Co. begin the rollout of its JPM Coin deposit token. 

The token, which enables institutional clients to settle transactions instantly and 24/7, marks a major expansion of traditional banking into public blockchain infrastructure and is based on the Base network. 

The token named the JPM Coin represents dollar deposits held at the bank, allowing clients to send and receive funds on Base. 

Unlike traditional stablecoins, JPM Coin can pay holders interest, which makes it an attractive alternative for institutions, including crypto trading firms that use stablecoins for collateral or liquidity management. 

By hosting both the JPM Coin and DeFi-native services, Base has the combo of supporting regulated banking tokens and permissionless financial applications, a synergy that creates a unified infrastructure under which TradFi and DeFi can coexist.

The alignment also shows that more banks are increasingly experimenting with blockchain to facilitate faster, cheaper, and more accessible payments beyond traditional business hours.

Get $50 free to trade crypto when you sign up to Bybit now

Key takeaways:

Falling DEX volumes, muted ETP flows and macro uncertainty are pressuring SOL prices and limiting appetite for bullish positions.

New spot ETFs for rival altcoins increase competition, though expected government stimulus could reignite demand for Solana.

Solana’s native token SOL (SOL) dropped 6% after getting rejected at $147 on Thursday. Investors became more risk-averse following the release of weak US job market data and soft consumer sentiment. 

Traders worry it may take longer than expected for SOL to revisit the $200 mark, especially after leverage traders were wiped out in October and November, while Solana network activity continues to decline.

Total Value Locked on Solana (left) vs. 7-day DEX volumes, USD. Source: DefiLlamaSolana’s total value locked (TVL) fell to $10.8 billion from $13.3 billion two months earlier. Several of the ecosystem’s top projects, including Kamino, Jupiter, Jito and Drift, saw deposit declines of 20% or more. Adding to the pressure, trading activity on Solana decentralized exchanges (DEX) also dropped sharply.

Even so, Solana kept its position as the second-largest network by TVL. Ethereum, however, remained dominant with $73.2 billion in deposits. Its layer-2 ecosystem—featuring Base, Arbitrum and Polygon—continues to attract meaningful capital. Ethereum’s Fusaka upgrade on Wednesday improved scalability and wallet management, reducing incentives for users to migrate funds to competing networks such as Solana.

Solana DEX volumes reached $19.2 billion in the seven days ending Nov. 30, a 40% drop from the $32 billion recorded four weeks earlier. With reduced onchain activity, investors fear weaker demand for SOL, creating a potential feedback loop as traders leave the Solana ecosystem in search of better opportunities. The newly launched layer-1 blockchain, Monad, for example, posted $1.2 billion in DEX volumes during its first week.

Layoffs and tighter consumer credit add pressure to SOL sentimentSOL traders also reacted to a report from Global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, citing 71,321 corporate layoffs in November, a level seen only twice since 2008. Further uncertainty arose from the consumer financing sector after multiple US State Attorneys General offices requested details from “Buy Now, Pay Later” providers regarding consumers’ ability to repay those loans.

A PayPal survey showed that half of shoppers plan to take personal loans during the holiday season, raising concerns about tightening credit conditions.

SOL perpetual futures annualized funding rate. Source: laevitas.chDemand for bullish leverage in SOL futures remains very low, with the annualized funding rate at 4%, below the neutral 6% mark. Part of this weak conviction stems from the lack of inflows into Solana exchange-traded products. According to a Dec. 1 CoinShares report, Bitcoin, Ethereum and XRP ETPs saw a combined $1.06 billion in inflows over the same period. 

Weekly crypto exchange-traded product flows, USD million. Source: CoinSharesOther altcoins, such as XRP (XRP), Litecoin (LTC) and Dogecoin (DOGE), recently had their spot ETFs approved in the US, creating new competition for institutional flows. Several other Solana competitors are expected to receive spot ETF approvals in the coming months.

The bearish momentum has also reduced the odds of listed companies issuing new shares to grow their SOL reserves. Forward Industries (FWDI US), for instance, holds 6.91 million SOL, which are currently trading below its initial investment, according to CoinGecko data. Issuing shares at prices that imply a SOL cost below their reserve level would dilute existing shareholders’ claim on those holdings.

SOL’s path back to $200 depends heavily on reduced macroeconomic uncertainty, but SOL bears might be taken by surprise as traders expect governments to adopt stimulus measures, which could provide the catalyst needed for a broader altcoin rally.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.

Domo, Inc. (DOMO) Q3 2026 Earnings Call December 4, 2025 5:00 PM EST

Company Participants

Cory Edwards
Joshua James - Founder, CEO & Director
Tod Crane - Chief Financial Officer
Daren Thayne - CTO & Executive VP of Product

Conference Call Participants

James Wood - TD Cowen, Research Division
Brett Huff - Stephens Inc., Research Division
Kincaid LaCorte
Eric Martinuzzi - Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC, Research Division
Lucky Schreiner - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Greetings, and welcome to the Domo Q3 Fiscal Year 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Cory Edwards, Vice President of Corporate Communications. Thank you, Cory. You may begin.

Cory Edwards

Good afternoon. On the call today, we are joined by Josh James, our Founder and CEO; and Tod Crane, our Chief Financial Officer. I'll begin with our safe harbor statement. Our press release was issued after the market close and is available on the Investor Relations section of our website.

Please note that today's call contains forward-looking statements about our business as defined under federal securities laws. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to, statements and projections about our future financial performance, growth prospects, cash position, sales efforts, technology developments, new business opportunities, transactions and initiatives the potential impact of artificial intelligence and macroeconomic factors on our business.

For a detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, please refer to our public filings, including today's press release, our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q, all available on the SEC website. These documents outline important risk factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements.

We will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures during

Recommended For You

Shareholders do not need to take any action at this time

Louisville, CO, Dec. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- CEA Industries Inc. (Nasdaq: BNC) (“BNC” or the “Company”), which manages the world’s largest corporate treasury of BNB, today issued the following statement regarding its commitment to the BNB token, and its ongoing work to strengthen its Board of Directors and sharpen its operations.

The Company acknowledges recent shareholder communications by YZILabs Management Ltd. (“YZi”), including most recently a press release issued on December 3, 2025. Contrary to the statements in that press release, the Company remains committed to becoming the world’s largest BNB treasury company.

Since the July PIPE investment, BNC has never considered an alternative token for the Company’s digital asset treasury (“DAT”) strategy, nor launched competitive DAT ventures. As of December 4, 2025, the Company holds 515,554 BNB tokens, equaling a market value of approximately $464.6 million at a price of $901.27 per BNB as of 4 PM EST, as reported on the Company’s BNB Treasury Dashboard released on its updated website earlier this month.

YZi’s press release comes two days after YZi filed a Preliminary Consent Statement, which proposes to expand and reconstitute the Board. The Company’s current Board is made up of a majority of independent directors, in compliance with Nasdaq rules, and is composed of directors with the knowledge and experience to effectively oversee the Company to deliver shareholder value. Following an extensive months-long search process, the Company has recently strengthened the Board by appointing as independent directors Annemarie Tierney and Carly E. Howard, both of whom are experienced board members who bring with them a litany of relevant digital asset legal and regulatory experience, as well as significant public company corporate governance knowledge.

The Company appreciates shareholder input, and always welcomes feedback and constructive ideas for improvement. In particular, the Company values its relationship with YZi as a significant shareholder and strategic partner, and appreciates its increased engagement. The Company is committed to engaging in constructive discussions on the topics raised with YZi, as well as with other shareholders and partners, all with the aim of building long-term shareholder value. To that end, the Company’s Board has reached out to YZi directly to create an open line of dialogue regarding YZi’s concerns and potential solutions, to review the concerns raised by YZi, and to take action where necessary to protect shareholder interests.

Shareholders do not need to take any action at this time.

About CEA Industries Inc.

CEA Industries Inc. (Nasdaq: BNC) is a growth-oriented company that has focused on building category-leading businesses in consumer markets, including building and managing the world’s largest corporate treasury of BNB.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” The statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. This press release specifically contains forward-looking statements regarding BNC’s expectations or beliefs regarding (i) the Company’s position as the largest BNB treasury in the world; (ii) the long-term growth and adoption of the BNB ecosystem; (iii) BNC’s role in advancing BNB’s global adoption; (iv) the growth of interest from institutional partners and investors worldwide; (v) BNC being the most trusted and strategically positioned digital asset treasury; (vi) BNC’s ability to scale its holdings and introduce innovative structures, which result in lasting value to stockholders and (vii) updates and expansion of the dashboard. BNC wishes to caution readers that these forward-looking statements may be affected by the risks and uncertainties in BNC’s business as well as other important factors may have affected and could in the future affect BNC’s actual results and could cause BNC’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of BNC. In evaluating these forward-looking statements, readers should consider various risk factors, which include, but are not limited to, BNC’s ability to keep pace with new technology and changing market needs; BNC’s ability to finance its current business and proposed future business, including the ability to finance the continued acquisition of BNB; the competitive environment of BNC’s business; and the future value and adoption of BNB. Actual future performance outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous conditions and risks, many of which are beyond BNC’s control. In addition, these forward-looking statements and the information in this press release is qualified in its entirety by cautionary statements and risk factor disclosures contained in BNC’s filings with the SEC, including BNC’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2025, and Form 10-KT filed with the SEC on July 25, 2025, each as may be amended or supplemented from time to time. Copies of BNC’s filings with the SEC are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov . BNC undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this press release, except as required by law.

Important Additional Information and Where to Find It

The Company intends to file a consent revocation statement on Schedule 14A, an accompanying YELLOW consent revocation card and other relevant documents with the SEC in connection with YZi’s consent solicitation. THE COMPANY’S STOCKHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE COMPANY’S DEFINITIVE CONSENT REVOCATION STATEMENT (INCLUDING ANY AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO), THE ACCOMPANYING YELLOW CONSENT REVOCATION CARD AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Stockholders may obtain free copies of the definitive consent revocation statement, an accompanying YELLOW consent revocation card, any amendments or supplements to the consent revocation statement and other documents that the Company files with the SEC at no charge from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies will also be available at no charge by scrolling to the “SEC Filings” section of the Company’s website at https://ceaindustries.com/investors.html.

Certain Information Regarding Participants in the Solicitation

The Company, its directors (Nicholas J. Etten, Carly E. Howard, Russell Read, Hans Thomas and Annemarie Tierney) and certain of its executive officers (David Namdar, Chief Executive Officer, and Anthony K. McDonald, President and Director) are deemed to be “participants” (as defined in Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in the solicitation of consent revocations from the Company’s stockholders in connection with YZi’s consent solicitation. Information about the names of the Company’s directors and officers, their respective interests in the Company, by security holdings or otherwise, and their respective compensation is set forth in the “Information about our Directors” and “Executive Officers” sections in Part III, Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance of the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-KT for the transition period from January 1, 2025 to April 30, 2025 (the “Form 10-KT”), in Part III, Item 11 – Executive Compensation of the Form 10-KT, in Part III, Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters of the Form 10-KT and in Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 8, 2025, October 7, 2025 and November 28, 2025. Supplemental information regarding the participants’ holdings of the Company’s securities can be found in SEC filings on Statements of Change in Ownership on Form 3 and Form 4. Any subsequent updates following the date hereof to the information regarding the identity of potential participants and their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be set forth in the Company’s consent revocation statement on Schedule 14A and other materials to be filed with the SEC in connection with YZi’s consent solicitation, if and when they become available. These documents will be available at no charge as described above.

CEA Industries Media Inquiries:
Edelman Smithfield
[email protected]

CEA Industries Investor Relations:
[email protected]

Pundits following the company are becoming slightly less optimistic on its future.

On a generally bullish Thursday for the U.S. stock markets, Airbus (EADSY 1.54%) wasn't a popular title. The sprawling European aerospace company took a nearly 2% hit to its share price, on the back of two analyst price target cuts.

Chop, chop
The two prognosticators in question -- Christophe Menard of Deutsche Bank and UBS's Ian Douglas-Pennant -- both labor for Europe-headquartered researchers. On Thursday morning, Menard reduced his Airbus fair value assessment to 222 euros ($259) per share, from his previous 228 euros ($266). Douglas-Pennant cut his to 230 euros ($268) from 240 euros ($280).

Image source: Getty Images.

These lowered expectations don't mean that either analyst is now an Airbus bear, however, as both maintained their existing buy recommendation on the stock.

It wasn't immediately clear why either pundit adjusted their takes on the company. It didn't seem coincidental that the two price target cuts came a day after Airbus cut its full-year 2025 delivery estimate. It's reduced this estimate by 4% to a total of roughly 790 jets for the year, due in no small part to a several manufacturing issues with its A320 airliner.

Today's Change

(

-1.54

%) $

-0.90

Current Price

$

57.40

No serious loss of altitude
It's probable that the two analysts held fast to their buy recommendations because this news from Airbus isn't too alarming.

No one likes a cut in delivery estimates, but there is clear demand for the A320, and it isn't outrageous or unusual for manufacturers of highly sophisticated planes to experience such difficulties. I think the company will work these out, so these latest developments wouldn't scare me away from owning the stock.

Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who acquired Jayud Global Logistics Limited (“Jayud” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:JYD) securities during the period of April 21, 2023 through April 30, 2025, inclusive (“the Class Period”). If you suffered a loss on your Jayud investments, you have until January 20, 2026 to request lead plaintiff appointment. For more information: [CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFE.

By

PYMNTS
 | 
December 4, 2025

 | 

Prediction market Polymarket said Wednesday (Dec. 3) that it has begun rolling out its U.S. app.

The move came nearly four years after the company was shut out of the American market by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and about three months after a no-action letter from the CFTC gave it a regulatory green light to re-enter the market.

“Against all odds. Polymarket’s U.S. app is now being rolled out to those on the waitlist,” the company wrote in a Wednesday post on X. “We’re launching with sports — followed by markets on everything.”

A notice on the company’s U.S. website told those on the waitlist: “Provide your phone number below to secure your spot & be notified when it’s your turn.”

In January 2022, the CFTC fined Polymarket $1.4 million for failing to register with the regulator and ordered the company to both shut down its markets and give full refunds to users.

The company got its regulatory green light to re-enter the American market in September, when the CFTC issued a no-action letter regarding event contracts in response to a request from two entities owned by Polymarket: QCX LLC, a designated contract market, and QC Clearing LLC, a derivatives clearing organization.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

The CFTC’s no-action letter allows event contracts without triggering standard swap data reporting and recordkeeping mandates.

In October, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the owner and operator of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), announced a strategic $2 billion investment in Polymarket.

The deal valued Polymarket at roughly $8 billion pre-investment and granted ICE not only a financial stake but also a central role as the global distributor of Polymarket’s event-driven data. In addition, the two companies will collaborate on a new generation of tokenization initiatives.

In November, Polymarket said it received an approval from the CFTC that positioned the company to return to the U.S. under a fully regulated exchange structure.

“This approval allows us to operate in a way that reflects the maturity and transparency that the U.S. regulatory framework demands,” Polymarket Founder and CEO Shayne Coplan said at the time in a press release. “We’re grateful for the constructive engagement with the CFTC and look forward to continuing to demonstrate leadership as a regulated U.S. exchange.”

Sign up to receive our daily newsletter.

We’re always on the lookout for opportunities to partner with innovators and disruptors.

Learn More

Ethereum has witnessed a recovery surge recently as on-chain data shows the shark-sized investors have been participating in strong buying.

Ethereum Sharks Have Added 450,000 ETH Since Mid-November
According to data from on-chain analytics firm Santiment, the supply of the Ethereum sharks has gone up recently. The indicator of relevance here is the “Supply Distribution,” measuring the total amount of tokens that a given wallet group as a whole is holding right now.

In the context of the current topic, the cohort of focus is the one corresponding to a coin range of 1,000 to 10,000 ETH. At the current exchange rate, the lower bound of the range roughly converts to $3.2 million and the upper one to $32 million. Investors of this large size are popularly known as the sharks. While not as massive as the whales (addresses with more than 10,000 ETH), the sharks are still considered influential entities. This can make their behavior often worth keeping an eye on.

As the chart below, shared by Santiment, suggests, the latest Ethereum shark behavior has been one of accumulation.

How the Supply Distribution of the ETH sharks has changed over the last few months | Source: Santiment on X
During the November price decline, the Supply Distribution had been going down for the Ethereum sharks, but around the time of the market bottom, its trend began to reverse. Between November 18th and December 2nd, the sharks added a total of 450,000 ETH (worth about $1.4 billion) to their wallets, a massive amount. Alongside this sharp uptick in the metric, ETH went through its price recovery.

The cryptocurrency’s sharp retrace to start December didn’t dissuade these large hands, either, as their supply only continued to rise. This may be one of the factors behind the quick resumption of bullish momentum that the asset has seen. Another bullish factor has been the trend in the Network Growth, another on-chain indicator displayed in the chart. This metric measures the daily number of addresses that are coming online on the Ethereum network for the first time.

A wallet is considered “online” when it participates in transaction activity on the blockchain, so the Network Growth essentially tracks the addresses making their very first transfer.

From the graph, it’s visible that this Ethereum metric has also surged recently, hitting a peak value of 190,000 addresses. Generally, a surge in network activity is usually a positive sign for any rally’s sustainability, as it implies that the network is able to attract fresh attention.

That said, too much attention too fast can actually end up having a negative effect on the cryptocurrency. It now remains to be seen whether the sharks will continue to buy in the near future and if investor FOMO will remain at healthy levels.

ETH Price
At the time of writing, Ethereum is floating around $3,185, up more than 5% over the last seven days.

Looks like the price of the coin has shot up over the last few days | Source: ETHUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, Santiment.net, chart from TradingView.com

Ethereum appears to be defying one of technical analysis’ most widely watched bearish indicators, with the recent 50-day and 200-day moving average death cross failing to trigger the expected downside. For weeks, traders anticipated further weakness as the shorter-term average drifted toward the longer-term trendline. While the cross finally printed, ETH price action has not followed the typical bearish script. Instead, momentum has begun shifting earlier than the indicator could reflect, a pattern often seen in classic death-cross fakeouts.

Historically, Ethereum has produced some of its strongest rally setups following these misleading crosses — not because the signal has predictive value, but because trader positioning becomes heavily skewed. When the majority expects continuation to the downside, even a modest bullish reversal can force rapid repositioning. This imbalance, combined with thin liquidity and modern algorithmic strategies, reduces the reliability of both the death cross and its bullish counterpart, the golden cross. Although these indicators may not forecast price direction with the clarity they once did, they still influence sentiment, trigger liquidations and shape short-term volatility.

At the moment, ETH is retesting the underside of the 50-day EMA, with the Relative Strength Index pushing back into the mid-50s and volume beginning to build. These signs suggest buyers are stepping in earlier than expected, increasing the probability that the bearish signal will be invalidated. If Ethereum manages to break into and hold the key $3,350 to $3,500 resistance zone, the 50-day moving average is likely to turn upward again. Such a shift would erase the death-cross impact and could set off a wave of short covering, liquidation-driven spikes and renewed momentum buying — conditions that often fuel strong upside extensions.

This evolving setup underscores how rapidly market dynamics can neutralize traditional signals, reinforcing the idea that sentiment and positioning now play a larger role in Ethereum’s price trajectory.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

The cryptocurrency market saw strong bullish momentum on December 4, with the total market cap rising to $3.1 trillion. Bitcoin maintained its position above $92,000, while Ethereum stabilized near $3,100. Despite a slight decline in overall trading volume to $143 billion, several altcoins outperformed the broader market. Among the standout movers were Bittensor (TAO), Zcash (ZEC), and Curve DAO Token (CRV), each benefiting from unique catalysts driving fresh investor interest.

Bittensor’s price climbed to $300, marking a 6% increase as the project approaches its first-ever halving event. Similar to Bitcoin’s supply reduction model, the halving will cut daily reward emissions by 50%, tightening token availability. Breaking past the $290 resistance has strengthened bullish sentiment, with traders anticipating that reduced supply could support further upside for TAO, especially if market momentum continues.

Zcash followed with a notable surge, rising 7% in the past 24 hours and trading around $351. The renewed interest in ZEC comes after its recent listing on Bitget—significant news for a privacy-focused cryptocurrency in a climate where many exchanges have steered away from such tokens due to regulatory pressure. The new listing has boosted market confidence and revived attention toward Zcash’s long-standing value proposition in transaction privacy.

Curve DAO Token also saw an uptick, gaining 8% to reach $0.41. CRV’s rise is tied to expanding liquidity and increasing participation in stablecoin pools across the DeFi ecosystem. As traders and institutions place more emphasis on reliable infrastructure over speculative hype, Curve’s role in powering major liquidity pools has helped stabilize activity and strengthen demand for CRV.

With the broader market in a bullish phase, TAO, ZEC, and CRV appear positioned for continued momentum. Key ecosystem developments, exchange listings, and upcoming protocol events are fueling optimism, suggesting these assets could remain strong performers as market conditions evolve.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Grayscale Investments signals that bitcoin's sharp pullback still aligns with bullish market behavior, spotlighting macro shifts and expanding institutional demand that could set the stage for potential new highs in 2026. Grayscale Cites Signs of a Crypto Bottom While Forecasting Next-Year Highs Digital asset manager Grayscale Investments' research team published a report on Dec.

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who acquired Blue Owl Capital (“Blue Owl” or the “Company”) (NYSE:OWL) securities during the period of February 6, 2025 through November 16, 2025, inclusive (“the Class Period”). If you suffered a loss on your Blue Owl investments, you have until February 2, 2026 to request lead plaintiff appointment. For more information: [CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A.

NEW YORK, Dec. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kirby McInerney LLP reminds StubHub Holdings, Inc. (“StubHub” or the “Company”) (NYSE:STUB) investors of the January 23, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a pending federal securities class action.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired StubHub securities, have information, or would like to learn more, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the form below, to discuss your rights or interests.

[CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS]

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased securities pursuant to the registration statement and prospectus (collectively “offering documents”) issued in connection with the Company’s September 2025 initial public offering (“IPO”). The lawsuit alleges that, in connection with its IPO, StubHub failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was experiencing changes in the timing of payments to vendors; (2) those changes had a significant adverse impact on free cash flow, including trailing 12 months free cash flow; (3) as a result, the Company’s free cash flow reports were materially misleading and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, the IPO offering documents were materially misleading.

On November 13, 2025, the Company released its first earnings since its September 2025 IPO, revealing a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million in the third quarter of 2025, a 143% decrease from the Company’s free cash flow in the year ago period, which was positive $10.6 million. On this news, the price of StubHub shares declined by $3.95 per share, or approximately 21.0%, from $18.82 per share on November 13, 2025 to close at $14.87 on November 14, 2025.

By November 24, 2025, StubHub’s stock price had fallen to $12.01, nearly 50% below the IPO price of $23.50 per share.

[CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION]

What Should I Do?

If you purchased or otherwise acquired StubHub securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[WHAT IS A SECURITIES CLASS ACTION?]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts
Kirby McInerney LLP
Lauren Molinaro, Esq.
212-699-1171
https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
[email protected]

The Australian unit of U.S. oil giant Chevron Corp said on Friday that the partners of the Gorgon Joint Venture have made a final investment decision on the A$3 billion ($1.98 billion) Gorgon Stage 3 development off Western Australia's northwest coast.

Moore Threads Technology Co , dubbed by analysts as "China's Nvidia", is expected to make a strong market debut in Shanghai on Friday, on bets that the U.S.-blacklisted startup will benefit from Beijing's drive to boost domestic chip manufacturing.

Genius Sports Limited (GENI) Analyst/Investor Day December 3, 2025 9:00 AM EST

Company Participants

Brandon Bukstel - Investor Relations Manager
Mark Locke - Co-Founder, CEO & Director
Matt Fleckenstein
Steven Bornstein - President of North America
Jack Davison - Chief Commercial Officer
Josh Linforth - Managing Director of Media & Engagement
Gena Walton
Bryan Castellani - Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Roger Goodell
Sam Bloom
Erick Estrada
Ryan Sigdahl - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division
Jed Kelly - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division
Michael Cahill - Crispin Capital Management, LLC
Barry Jonas - Truist Securities, Inc., Research Division
Bernard McTernan - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division
Jordan Bender - Citizens JMP Securities, LLC, Research Division
Michael Hickey - The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division
Jason Bazinet - Citigroup Inc., Research Division

Conversation

Operator

Please welcome to the stage, Investor Relations Manager, Brandon Bukstel.

Brandon Bukstel
Investor Relations Manager

Okay. Good morning, everyone. It's great to have you with us today. Before we begin, I just want to very quickly discuss a few housekeeping items. First, I just want to point out the location of the restrooms, which is just through this door in the back to my left. Second, in case of an emergency, fire exits will be through the main entrance behind you or through the exits here near the restrooms. Third, I know a few of you have asked for the Wi-Fi. We're going to be using the Genius Sports Wi-Fi and the password is intelligent sports. Now for the event itself, we expect this will be about 3 hours in length, including two 10-minute breaks in between. At the end of the presentation, we'll have time for Q&A, so we ask that you just save any questions for the end.

And lastly, today's presentation will include certain non-GAAP measures, and you can find the definitions and reconciliations in the Investor

Recommended For You

Spot gold fell. The latest U.S. jobs data did little to sway expectations of a Fed rate cut next week, the ANZ Research said.

WTI oil prices were heading for weekly gains of close to 2% in early trading on Friday, supported by an expected Federal Reserve interest rate cut, escalating U.S.-Venezuela tensions and stalled peace talks in Moscow.

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESS Newswire / December 4, 2025 / Klondike Gold Corp. (TSXV:KG)(FRA:LBDP)(OTCQB:KDKGF) ("Klondike Gold" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the results of its annual general meeting of shareholders held today, December 4, 2025. The Company elected five directors to its board, namely Peter Tallman, Gordon Keep, John Pallot, Steven Brunelle and Anne Labelle.

The shareholders approved all other matters as proposed, including the appointment of Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants as auditors of the Company, and the approval of the Company's stock option plan.

ABOUT KLONDIKE GOLD CORP.
Klondike Gold is a Vancouver based gold exploration company advancing its 100%-owned Klondike District Gold Project located at Dawson City, Yukon, one of the top mining jurisdictions in the world. The Klondike District Gold Project targets gold associated with district scale orogenic faults along the 55-km length of the famous Klondike Goldfields placer district. Multi-km gold mineralization has been identified at both the Lone Star Zone and Stander Zone, among other targets. The Company has identified a Mineral Resource Estimate of 469,000 Indicated and 112,000 Inferred gold ounces1, a milestone first for the Klondike District. The Company is focused on exploration and development of its 727 square km property accessible by scheduled airline and government-maintained roads located on the outskirts of Dawson City, Yukon, within the Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in First Nation traditional territory.

1The Mineral Resource Estimate for the Klondike District Property was prepared by Marc Jutras, P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc., an independent Qualified Person in accordance with the requirements of NI 43-101. The technical report supporting the Mineral Resource Estimate entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Klondike District Gold Project, Yukon Territory, Canada" has been filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca effective November 10, 2022. Refer to news release of December 16, 2022.

ON BEHALF OF KLONDIKE GOLD CORP.

"Peter Tallman"

Peter Tallman
President and CEO

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Telephone: (604) 609-6136
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.klondikegoldcorp.com

SOURCE: Klondike Gold Corp.

December 04, 2025 8:32 PM EST | Source: CAT Strategic Metals Corporation
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - December 4, 2025) - CAT Strategic Metals Corporation (CSE: CAT) (OTC Pink: CATTF) (FSE: 8CHA) ("CAT" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the closing of its previously announced rights offering on November 24, 2025. The Company received 46,802,243 subscriptions for units pursuant to the basic subscription privilege and an additional 14,958,000 subscriptions pursuant to the additional subscription privilege (the "Offering"). As such, a total of 61,760,243 units (the "Units") were purchased for gross proceeds of $463,201.82. The net proceeds of the Offering will be used towards exploration expenditures at its Burntland Project and for working capital and general corporate purposes.

Each Unit consists of one common share (a "Common Share") and one Common Share purchase warrant (a "Warrant"). Each Warrant is exercisable into one Common Share at a price of $0.05 per share until 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on November 21, 2030. The Warrants are currently listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange under the trading symbol "CAT.WT".

To the knowledge of the Company, after reasonable inquiry, no director, officer or insider of the Company purchased any Units. To the knowledge of the Company, after reasonable inquiry, no person became a new shareholder holding more than 10% of the Common Shares upon closing of the Offering.

Following the closing of the Offering, the Company will have 339,553,654 Common Shares issued and outstanding, before exercise of the Warrants.

This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities within the United States, and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States, or to or for the account or benefit of any person in the United States or any "U.S. person" (as defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended), unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, or pursuant to an exemption from such registration requirements.

About CAT Strategic Metals Corporation (CAT)

CAT Strategic Metals' corporate strategy, as reflected in its overall Mission Statement, is to source, identify, acquire and advance property interests located in mineral districts proven to have world-class potential, primarily lithium, copper, gold, silver and tellurium. In addition to the Gold Jackpot strategic metals property located NE of Elko, Nevada, CAT also controls the Burntland Project located northeast of St. Quentin in the Restigouche County, New Brunswick, Canada, directed at the exploration and development of several Skarn-hosted copper-silver, gold targets. CAT's shares trade on the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE) under the trading symbol "CAT", and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol "8CHA".

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD

Robert Rosner
Chairman, President & CEO

Further information regarding the Company can be found on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca, by visiting the Company's website www.catstrategic.com or by contacting the Company directly at (604) 674-3145 or by e-mail at [email protected]. Neither Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. All statements herein, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking information. Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, statements regarding: the intended use of proceeds and CAT's ability to continue as a going concern and execute its current business objectives. Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions and estimates, including, without limitation, assumptions regarding the general stability of the economic and political environment in which CAT operates; the Corporation's ability to obtain all required approvals and consents, including CSE acceptance of the listing of the rights and the warrants; investor interest and participation in the Rights Offering; CAT's ability to access capital on acceptable terms; the Corporation's future growth potential and operating performance; and that general business and economic conditions will not change materially adversely. Although the Corporation considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to management, they may prove to be incorrect. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: the potential that the Rights Offering will not be completed on the terms described herein or at all; the Corporation's inability to obtain required regulatory approvals; fluctuations in general market conditions and the trading price of the common shares; dilution resulting from the Rights Offering or other future financings; the Corporation's ability to continue as a going concern; operating and financial risks inherent in the mineral exploration and resource development industries; the availability of financing; political and regulatory risks; changes in laws or regulations; and other factors beyond the control of CAT.

Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties that could affect the Corporation's operations and financial results can be found in CAT's filings with Canadian securities regulators, available under the Corporation's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained in this news release is made as of the date hereof, and CAT disclaims any obligation to update or revise such information, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR FOR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/277012

Price Prediction

Technical Analysis

Vanguard

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Content Writer

Harvey Hunter

Content Writer

Harvey Hunter

About Author

Harvey Hunter is a Content Writer at Cryptonews.com. With a background in Computer Science, IT, and Mathematics, he seamlessly transitioned from tech geek to crypto journalist.

Has Also Written

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Last updated: 

December 4, 2025

The new week has brought a major development for Solana, with growing interest from traditional finance helping fuel bullish Solana price predictions.

Vanguard, one of the world’s largest asset managers with over $11 trillion under management, has reversed its crypto ban.

Clients can now access crypto-related ETFs and mutual funds through the platform, marking a major shift in mainstream adoption.

🚨NEWS: Vanguard, the world’s 2nd largest asset manager with about $11T in AUM, has made @Solana ETFs available across its platform, opening access to roughly 50 million clients. pic.twitter.com/T45y5EMGLz

— SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) December 2, 2025
Even a small share of that capital would translate into explosive growth, and Solana is a standout beneficiary as the proven institutional play of choice.

The altcoin saw a 22-day inflow streak during crypto’s second-worst month of the year as TradFi markets chose to buy the dip on Solana over other ETF offerings.

U.S. Spot SOL ETF Daily Inflows. Source: SoSoValue.And with the fresh exposure, Solana ETFs are once again catching a bid from investors, with $46.7 million in inflows the day of the announcement.

Solana Price Predictions: Could Vanguard Fuel a $1000 MoveThis fresh touch point for inflows arrives as Solana flashes its strongest bottom signal yet with a double bottom pattern forming along a historic support trendline.

The $120 level has marked local bottoms throughout the bullish phase of the market cycle, and it appears to act as a launchpad yet again as momentum indicators flip bullish.

SOL USD 1-day chart, double bottom fuels descending triangle. Source: TradingView.The RSI is testing the neutral line after being trapped in oversold conditions for the past 2 months while the RSI builds a lead above the signal line. Both suggest that buyers are taking control of the prevailing trend.

With a decisive break above the double bottom neckline at $144, the fully realised structure eyes a push to $210.

This would trigger a retest of a wider year-long descending triangle pattern, creating a potential breakout scenario eyeing much higher targets around $500, a 250% gain.

With anticipated U.S. interest rate cuts in December set to stimulate risk sentiment across investment markets, Vanguard exposure could fuel a larger 600% move to $ 1,000 for SOL.

SUBBD: An Early Play With Fundamentals Just as StrongWith market conditions shaping up for an explosive year-end, capital is rotating into the next high-upside contender, and increasingly, SUBBD ($SUBBD).

The project is redefining the $85 billion subscriber economy by giving creators true ownership and fans genuine access through an AI-powered content platform.

Never miss a sale again.

As a top creator, your audience is global. It's just not possible to cater to everyone – you can't be online 24/7 🫠

That's where your personal AI Assistant comes in, to handle requests and secure payments. Sleep peacefully knowing you're making money… pic.twitter.com/ju9VjLBmea

— SUBBD (@SUBBDofficial) March 26, 2025
By cutting out the middlemen, $SUBDD puts control back in the hands of those who create real value.

Creators can monetize directly, while fans gain access to exclusive content, early releases, and meaningful interactions through token-gated perks.

The concept is already gaining traction. $SUBBD nears $1.4 million in presale, as investors back the shift toward a decentralized creator economy.

With SUBBD, both sides of the community win — creators earn more, and fans get closer while embracing the decentralization use cases crypto was built for.

Visit the Official SUBBD Website Here

Follow us on Google News

The year is 2075. The judge does not ask for a deed. She asks for a transaction ID.

The landlord’s lawyer queues up a Bitcoin transaction from fifteen years earlier that moved a token representing the property.

The tenant’s lawyer concedes the transaction exists, yet claims the signature was obtained under duress.

Everyone in the courtroom accepts what the chain records, but no one agrees on what the record means.

That scene captures a question that is moving from thought experiment to institutional design problem: at what point does a monetary network stop being treated mainly as money and start functioning as a default record of who owned what, and when?

For now, courts still lean on familiar tools.Chain of title for land runs through registries, index books, PDF databases, and sworn testimonies. Corporate ownership flows through transfer agents, company ledgers, and filings with agencies. Contracts live in filing cabinets, cloud folders, and email threads.

These systems rest on people and offices, not consensus algorithms, and they work until they do not.

Fire, war, regime change, data loss, and quiet fraud all create gaps. According to the World Bank, billions of people lack formal proof of land rights, which leaves them exposed when authorities or rivals dispute an unwritten history.

According to Transparency International, corruption involving public records remains common in many states, including basic acts such as inserting or deleting entries in registries.

Legal systems are built to cope with such fragility, through doctrines on evidence, presumptions, and appeals, yet every workaround carries cost and delay.

Bitcoin’s pitch: an evidence trail that doesn’t depend on institutions staying honestBitcoin introduced an alternative way to preserve a history of events, one that does not assume a single office or country will remain honest or functional.

Every roughly ten minutes, miners assemble a block of transactions, compete to prove work on a hash puzzle, and broadcast the winning block to a network of nodes.

Each block commits to the previous one through a hash link, so the longest chain of valid work becomes an ordered list of events that is very hard to rewrite without repeating that work.

The result is a timechain: a public, replicated log where each entry has a position, a timestamp window, and an economic cost to alter. Per the original Bitcoin white paper, proof-of-work turns the chain into a record of “what happened when” that any node can verify. Even if some nodes shut down or some jurisdictions ban miners, other nodes can preserve the ledger and its ordering.

Inside that ledger, Bitcoin’s unspent transaction output model, or UTXO set, defines who can move which coins. Every transaction consumes old outputs and creates new ones. Ownership of a coin, in protocol terms, means the ability to produce a valid signature that spends a given output under its locking script. That graph of spending forms a perfect chain of title for satoshis, from coinbase transactions to the present.

That same structure can be used to mark other claims. Colored coins, inscriptions, and various token layers embed references to external rights inside Bitcoin transactions.

A satoshi can come to stand for a share in a company, a document hash, or a pointer to a land parcel held in a separate database. The timechain then becomes a permanent index of when those markers moved between keys, whether or not any court noticed at the time.

Bitcoin, however, only guarantees certain things. It shows that, at a particular block height, a set of digital signatures passed verification under known rules. It shows that the network accepted it as valid and that later blocks were built on that acceptance.

It does not know who held the hardware wallet. It does not know whether a person signed freely, signed under duress, lost a key, or used malware.

Courts care about that gap. Legal ownership rests on identity, capacity, intent, and consent. When judges admit a PDF contract or a bank ledger, they do not treat those records as automatic proof of rightful ownership. They treat them as evidence that can be challenged with testimony, other records, and context. A Bitcoin entry fits that pattern. It is part of the story, not the whole story.

Even so, Bitcoin is already being used in formal disputes.United States cases involving Silk Road, ransomware, theft, and exchange failures have relied on blockchain analysis to trace funds and to prove that certain payments occurred, with judges accepting block explorers and expert testimony as a way to ground facts about transfers — see Silk Road seizure, Colonial Pipeline ransom recovery, and Bitfinex arrests & recovery.

According to the Law Library of Congress, courts and lawmakers in several jurisdictions, including Vermont and Arizona, have granted blockchain records (not only Bitcoin) a presumption of authenticity or legal recognition for some purposes.

Further, the Supreme People’s Court of China has authorized internet courts to accept blockchain entries as evidence when parties can show how the data was stored and verified.

A short timeline of turning a blockchain entry from curiosity into courtroom material already exists.

YearJurisdictionEvent2013United StatesFederal court in SEC v. Shavers recognizes Bitcoin as money for purposes of securities fraud analysis.2016VermontState law gives blockchain records status as self-authenticating business records under evidence rules (12 V.S.A. §1913).2017ArizonaState law recognizes smart contracts and blockchain signatures for enforceable contracts (HB 2417 / A.R.S. §44-7061).2018ChinaSupreme People’s Court states that internet courts may accept blockchain data as evidence.2020sMultipleCriminal and civil cases reference Bitcoin transactions to prove payment, trace proceeds, and anchor document hashes (e.g., U.S. v. Gratkowski).Each entry, on its own, is modest.

Together, they show a pattern in which courts treat blockchains as a trustworthy factual substrate for digital events, then embed that substrate within older doctrines.

Bitcoin was built as a way to move value without trust in a bank, yet in practice, it also operates as a way to anchor facts without trust in a clerk.

From timestamped proof to default registryThe question is when that anchoring crosses a threshold from a rare exhibit to a default record. The shift is less about ideology and more about convenience and cost.

A judge reaches for a standard source when it is easier to access and harder to argue with than the alternative.

For locally recorded assets inside a stable jurisdiction, that will remain the land office or corporate registry for a long time. For cross-border claims, long time horizons and fragile states, the calculus looks different.

Imagine a real estate portfolio spanning five countries, where registries vary in quality and political risk.

A fund can maintain its own internal ledger and sign periodic snapshots, yet it still faces disputes over which version of that ledger should prevail in court.

If, instead, it embeds hashes of its ownership tree into Bitcoin every quarter, any shareholder, regulator, or counterparty can verify that a particular position existed at a specific block height. A future litigant might argue about how to interpret that snapshot, yet they cannot say that it never existed.

Something similar already happens for documents. According to public documentation from OpenTimestamps and related projects, users can include file hashes in a Bitcoin transaction and later prove that the files were created before a given block.

Human rights groups and journalists have used related methods, such as the Starling Lab framework, to timestamp photos and reports, thereby creating a resilient trail when traditional archives are censored or confiscated.

In those cases, Bitcoin acts as a neutral notary that no single regime can silence.

Moving from timestamp to title is a larger leap.Property law involves competing claims, public notice, and state-backed enforcement. Even if every deed in a country were mirrored on Bitcoin, courts would still need a rule for conflicts between the chain and the paper registry.

A legislature could state that the on-chain token is legally controlling, that it is only evidence alongside the official roll, or that it has no effect at all. Until a jurisdiction writes these rules in detail, Bitcoin-based titles will remain in a gray zone.

There are, however, environments where that gray zone becomes an advantage.

In a failed state where the land office burned or where officials routinely overwrite past records, parties may prefer any external anchor that a foreign court will take seriously.

If a regional arbitration panel or an international tribunal begins to treat old Bitcoin entries as the cleanest account of who controlled which claims at which dates, that practice could pull local courts along over time.

The ledger becomes the default not because someone declared it so, but because nothing else is more durable or more widely checkable.

That is also true inside corporations. Many firms already push internal logs to append-only storage so that auditors can see when orders changed, who approved transfers, and how inventory moved.

Anchoring periodic Merkle roots of those logs to Bitcoin raises the bar: it forces any would-be fraudster to fight the entire history of the chain if they want to hide edits after the fact.

Regulators who grow comfortable reading those anchors will face pressure to treat them as baseline evidence in enforcement actions.

A global evidence ledger would not serve everyone equally.Long-term savers, whistleblowers, and dissidents gain from a record that survives regime changes and server failures. Tax authorities gain from the ability to reconstruct years of transactions from a shared public database. Authoritarian governments gain from new tools to monitor flows and identify networks that treat pseudonymous records as a thin cover. Privacy advocates, defense lawyers, and citizens who want the option to move on from past mistakes face a ledger that never forgets.

Legal systems will have to confront a deeper challenge as they lean on infrastructure they do not control.

A judge can order a registrar to correct a wrongful entry or expunge a file. No court can order miners and nodes worldwide to delete a block.

Remedies will need to act at the edges: ordering a bank to treat a specific output as tainted, ordering a company to reverse a token transfer on a side ledger, granting damages rather than rewriting the past.

Jurisdictions will diverge in how much weight they give the same transaction ID. One court may treat it as conclusive proof of ownership at a date. Another may treat it as a single data point that can be overcome by testimony of theft or coercion.

Forks and bugs expose another layer of fragility.Bitcoin’s history already includes rare moments when the community stepped in to change what the chain “really” was.

In 2010, an integer overflow bug created an invalid amount of new coins, and developers released a patch that led nodes to reorganize the chain and forget those outputs.

In 2013, a database glitch caused a temporary split that nodes later healed by agreeing on which side to follow (see BIP-50 post-mortem).

According to developer mailing list archives, these events were treated as emergency responses, not routine governance, yet they show that immutability is both code and social coordination.

Future forks could be more contentious. The 2017 split that created Bitcoin Cash showed how communities can diverge over block size and treat different chains as the real continuation of a project.

For most users, market prices and protocol support settled the matter.

For courts, the question is more subtle: which chain holds the authoritative record for a tokenized share or deed that was originally anchored before the split.

Legislatures may need to define how to pick an authoritative chain for evidence purposes, possibly by reference to hash rate, node count, or named software clients.

Lawyers will adapt by hedging.Parties who treat Bitcoin as an evidence anchor can mirror the identical hashes onto other public chains or trusted timestamping services, keep notarized paper copies, and write contracts that specify which chain controls in case of a split.

Judges can accept blockchain entries while still requiring corroboration. Nothing requires a binary choice between on-chain and off-chain records.

The turning point, when Bitcoin functions less as a curiosity and more as infrastructure that courts quietly rely on, will not arrive with a single statute or landmark case.

It will arrive when line judges, registrars, and in-house counsel find that checking the timechain for a transaction or a document hash has become routine, that overturning that record is more complex than living with it, and that litigants expect those checks as part of due diligence.

Back in the courtroom, the eviction case ends with a written opinion that cites the transaction ID as proof that a digital claim moved at a particular block height, then spends far more pages working through whether that move reflected valid consent under local law.

The judge does not need to declare Bitcoin the world’s archive. By citing it without ceremony, the court treats the chain as one more institutional record in a world where many records have drifted out of human hands, into a ledger that keeps track of who claimed what and when.