Market Signal Briefing

PHILADELPHIA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Comcast Corporation will host a conference call with the financial community to discuss financial results for the first quarter on Thursday, April 23, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Comcast will issue a press release reporting its results earlier that morning. The conference call will be broadcast live on Comcast's Investor Relations website at www.cmcsa.com. A replay of the call will be available starting at 11:30 a.m. ET on Thursday, April 23, 2026, on th.

When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?

Let's take a look at what these Wall Street heavyweights have to say about TSMC (TSM - Free Report) before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage.

TSMC currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.22, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 18 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.22 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 18 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 15 are Strong Buy and two are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 83.3% and 11.1% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for TSM

Check price target & stock forecast for TSMC here>>>

The ABR suggests buying TSMC, but making an investment decision solely on the basis of this information might not be a good idea. According to several studies, brokerage recommendations have little to no success guiding investors to choose stocks with the most potential for price appreciation.

Are you wondering why? The vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover often results in a strong positive bias of their analysts in rating it. Our research shows that for every "Strong Sell" recommendation, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

Zacks Rank, our proprietary stock rating tool with an impressive externally audited track record, categorizes stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), and is an effective indicator of a stock's price performance in the near future. Therefore, using the ABR to validate the Zacks Rank could be an efficient way of making a profitable investment decision.

ABR Should Not Be Confused With Zacks RankIn spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.

The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.

In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.

In addition, the different Zacks Rank grades are applied proportionately to all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide current-year earnings estimates. In other words, this tool always maintains a balance among its five ranks.

There is also a key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank when it comes to freshness. When you look at the ABR, it may not be up-to-date. Nonetheless, since brokerage analysts constantly revise their earnings estimates to reflect changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in predicting future stock prices.

Is TSM Worth Investing In?In terms of earnings estimate revisions for TSMC, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 1.9% over the past month to $14.38.

Analysts' growing optimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to soar in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) for TSMC. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, the Buy-equivalent ABR for TSMC may serve as a useful guide for investors.

Investors often turn to recommendations made by Wall Street analysts before making a Buy, Sell, or Hold decision about a stock. While media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm employed (or sell-side) analysts often affect a stock's price, do they really matter?

Let's take a look at what these Wall Street heavyweights have to say about Brinker International (EAT - Free Report) before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage.

Brinker International currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.56, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 24 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.56 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 24 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 16 are Strong Buy and two are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 66.7% and 8.3% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for EAT

Check price target & stock forecast for Brinker International here>>>

The ABR suggests buying Brinker International, but making an investment decision solely on the basis of this information might not be a good idea. According to several studies, brokerage recommendations have little to no success guiding investors to choose stocks with the most potential for price appreciation.

Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near-term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.

ABR Should Not Be Confused With Zacks RankIn spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.

Broker recommendations are the sole basis for calculating the ABR, which is typically displayed in decimals (such as 1.28). The Zacks Rank, on the other hand, is a quantitative model designed to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.

On the other hand, earnings estimate revisions are at the core of the Zacks Rank. And empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.

Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.

Is EAT a Good Investment?Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for Brinker International, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 0.1% over the past month to $10.68.

Analysts' growing optimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to soar in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for Brinker International. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, the Buy-equivalent ABR for Brinker International may serve as a useful guide for investors.

The recommendations of Wall Street analysts are often relied on by investors when deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock. Media reports about these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts changing their ratings often affect a stock's price. Do they really matter, though?

Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about Hamilton Insurance (HG - Free Report) .

Hamilton Insurance currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.88, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by eight brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.88 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the eight recommendations that derive the current ABR, four are Strong Buy and one is Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 50% and 12.5% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for HG

Check price target & stock forecast for Hamilton Insurance here>>>

While the ABR calls for buying Hamilton Insurance, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.

Do you wonder why? As a result of the vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover, their analysts tend to rate it with a strong positive bias. According to our research, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations for every "Strong Sell" recommendation.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

Zacks Rank, our proprietary stock rating tool with an impressive externally audited track record, categorizes stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), and is an effective indicator of a stock's price performance in the near future. Therefore, using the ABR to validate the Zacks Rank could be an efficient way of making a profitable investment decision.

Zacks Rank Should Not Be Confused With ABRAlthough both Zacks Rank and ABR are displayed in a range of 1--5, they are different measures altogether.

Broker recommendations are the sole basis for calculating the ABR, which is typically displayed in decimals (such as 1.28). The Zacks Rank, on the other hand, is a quantitative model designed to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.

On the other hand, earnings estimate revisions are at the core of the Zacks Rank. And empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.

Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.

Is HG Worth Investing In?Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for Hamilton Insurance, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has declined 11.4% over the past month to $3.42.

Analysts' growing pessimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates lower, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to plunge in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for Hamilton Insurance. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, it could be wise to take the Buy-equivalent ABR for Hamilton Insurance with a grain of salt.

The recommendations of Wall Street analysts are often relied on by investors when deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock. Media reports about these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts changing their ratings often affect a stock's price. Do they really matter, though?

Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about Nvidia (NVDA - Free Report) .

Nvidia currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.18, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 50 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.18 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 50 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 45 are Strong Buy and three are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 90% and 6% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for NVDA

Check price target & stock forecast for Nvidia here>>>

While the ABR calls for buying Nvidia, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.

Are you wondering why? The vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover often results in a strong positive bias of their analysts in rating it. Our research shows that for every "Strong Sell" recommendation, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations.

In other words, their interests aren't always aligned with retail investors, rarely indicating where the price of a stock could actually be heading. Therefore, the best use of this information could be validating your own research or an indicator that has proven to be highly successful in predicting a stock's price movement.

Zacks Rank, our proprietary stock rating tool with an impressive externally audited track record, categorizes stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), and is an effective indicator of a stock's price performance in the near future. Therefore, using the ABR to validate the Zacks Rank could be an efficient way of making a profitable investment decision.

ABR Should Not Be Confused With Zacks RankAlthough both Zacks Rank and ABR are displayed in a range of 1--5, they are different measures altogether.

The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

Analysts employed by brokerage firms have been and continue to be overly optimistic with their recommendations. Since the ratings issued by these analysts are more favorable than their research would support because of the vested interest of their employers, they mislead investors far more often than they guide.

In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.

In addition, the different Zacks Rank grades are applied proportionately to all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide current-year earnings estimates. In other words, this tool always maintains a balance among its five ranks.

There is also a key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank when it comes to freshness. When you look at the ABR, it may not be up-to-date. Nonetheless, since brokerage analysts constantly revise their earnings estimates to reflect changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in predicting future stock prices.

Should You Invest in NVDA?In terms of earnings estimate revisions for Nvidia, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 7% over the past month to $7.82.

Analysts' growing optimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to soar in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) for Nvidia. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, the Buy-equivalent ABR for Nvidia may serve as a useful guide for investors.

Target Hospitality (TH - Free Report) reported $89.78 million in revenue for the quarter ended December 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 7.3%. EPS of -$0.15 for the same period compares to $0.12 a year ago.

The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $85.2 million, representing a surprise of +5.37%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of -45.21%, with the consensus EPS estimate being -$0.10.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately.

Here is how Target Hospitality performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Revenue- Hospitality & Facilities Services - South: $33.9 million compared to the $34.34 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of -7.7% year over year.Revenue- All Other: $2.51 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $2.95 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -22.9%.Revenue- Workforce Hospitality Solutions (WHS): $39.71 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $35.65 million.Revenue- Government: $13.66 million versus $12.7 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -68.7% change.Adjusted Gross Profit- Government: $5.4 million compared to the $5.7 million average estimate based on two analysts.Adjusted Gross Profit- Workforce Hospitality Solutions (WHS): $9.1 million compared to the $2.32 million average estimate based on two analysts.Adjusted Gross Profit- Hospitality & Facilities Services - South: $8.45 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $9.82 million.View all Key Company Metrics for Target Hospitality here>>>

Shares of Target Hospitality have returned +8.1% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.2% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV - Free Report) reported $0.88 million in revenue for the quarter ended December 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 390%. EPS of -$0.46 for the same period compares to -$0.23 a year ago.

The reported revenue represents a surprise of +16.51% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.76 million. With the consensus EPS estimate being -$0.49, the EPS surprise was +6.75%.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately.

Here is how Serve Robotics Inc. performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Daily Active Robots: 547 versus 400 estimated by two analysts on average.Revenue- Software services: $0.23 million versus $0.16 million estimated by three analysts on average.Revenue- Fleet services: $0.65 million versus $0.59 million estimated by three analysts on average.View all Key Company Metrics for Serve Robotics Inc. here>>>

Shares of Serve Robotics Inc. have returned -6.3% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.2% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

Investors often turn to recommendations made by Wall Street analysts before making a Buy, Sell, or Hold decision about a stock. While media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm employed (or sell-side) analysts often affect a stock's price, do they really matter?

Before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage, let's see what these Wall Street heavyweights think about DraftKings (DKNG - Free Report) .

DraftKings currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.49, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 34 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.49 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 34 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 25 are Strong Buy and three are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 73.5% and 8.8% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for DKNG

Check price target & stock forecast for DraftKings here>>>

While the ABR calls for buying DraftKings, it may not be wise to make an investment decision solely based on this information. Several studies have shown limited to no success of brokerage recommendations in guiding investors to pick stocks with the best price increase potential.

Are you wondering why? The vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover often results in a strong positive bias of their analysts in rating it. Our research shows that for every "Strong Sell" recommendation, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near-term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.

Zacks Rank Should Not Be Confused With ABRIn spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.

Broker recommendations are the sole basis for calculating the ABR, which is typically displayed in decimals (such as 1.28). The Zacks Rank, on the other hand, is a quantitative model designed to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

It has been and continues to be the case that analysts employed by brokerage firms are overly optimistic with their recommendations. Because of their employers' vested interests, these analysts issue more favorable ratings than their research would support, misguiding investors far more often than helping them.

In contrast, the Zacks Rank is driven by earnings estimate revisions. And near-term stock price movements are strongly correlated with trends in earnings estimate revisions, according to empirical research.

In addition, the different Zacks Rank grades are applied proportionately to all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide current-year earnings estimates. In other words, this tool always maintains a balance among its five ranks.

There is also a key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank when it comes to freshness. When you look at the ABR, it may not be up-to-date. Nonetheless, since brokerage analysts constantly revise their earnings estimates to reflect changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in predicting future stock prices.

Is DKNG Worth Investing In?Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for DraftKings, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has declined 51.5% over the past month to $0.82.

Analysts' growing pessimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates lower, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to plunge in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) for DraftKings. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

Therefore, it could be wise to take the Buy-equivalent ABR for DraftKings with a grain of salt.

Key Takeaways Franco-Nevada reported Q4 adjusted EPS of $1.85, topping estimates, as revenues surged 86% y/y to $597M.FNV sold 127,959 gold equivalent ounces from Precious Metal assets in Q4, up 34% y/y.Franco-Nevada expects 510-570K GEOs in 2026, aided by Cote Gold, Porcupine, Valentine Gold and mine ramp-ups. Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV - Free Report) reported adjusted earnings of $1.85 per share in fourth-quarter 2025, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.68. The bottom line increased 95% year over year.

Franco-Nevada’s EBITDA Margin Rises Y/YFNV generated revenues of $597 million in the reported quarter, marking a year-over-year surge of 86.1%. The upside was driven by record gold and silver prices, and strong production from Antamina and South Arturo. In the December-end quarter, 90% of revenues were sourced from Precious Metal assets (71% gold, 17% silver and 2% platinum group metals).

Franco-Nevada sold 127,959 Gold Equivalent Ounces  (GEOs) from Precious Metal assets in the reported quarter, up 34% from the prior-year quarter.

In the reported quarter, adjusted EBITDA rose 95.1% year over year to $541 million. The adjusted EBITDA margin was 90.6% in the quarter under review compared with 86.4% in the prior-year quarter.

FNV’s Q4 Financial PositionAt the end of 2025, Franco-Nevada had $0.67 billion in cash in hand, down from $1.45 billion as of the end of 2024. It recorded an operating cash flow of record $1.49 billion in 2025, up from $0.83 billion in 2024.

The company is debt-free and uses its free cash flow to expand the portfolio and pay out dividends.

Franco-Nevada’s 2025 ResultsFNV reported adjusted earnings per share of $5.58 in 2025 compared with $3.21 in the prior year. The company’s 2025 earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5.31.

Revenues surged 64% year over year to a record $1.82 billion. The metric surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.67 billion.

FNV’s 2026 GuidanceFranco-Nevada expects total GEOs between 510,000 and 570,000 for 2026, indicating a 4% increase at the mid-point from the 2025 reported figure. The upside will be driven by the first full year of contribution from Cote Gold, Porcupine and Valentine Gold. The continued ramp-up of Salares Norte and Greenstone, along with recent acquisitions, will also aid growth.

Franco-Nevada Stock’s Price PerformanceThe company’s shares have soared 81.7% in the past year compared with the industry’s growth of 139.2%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Performance of Mining-Gold Stocks in Q4Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM - Free Report) reported adjusted earnings of $2.69 per share for the fourth quarter of 2025, up from $1.26 in the year-ago quarter. Agnico Eagle Mines’s bottom line topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.56.

Agnico Eagle Mines generated revenues of $3.56 billion, surging 60.3% year over year. The top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.24 billion.

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC - Free Report) reported adjusted earnings of 67 cents per share for the fourth quarter of 2025, up from 20 cents in the year-ago quarter. Kinross Gold’s bottom line topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 55 cents.

Kinross Gold generated revenues of $2.02 billion, up 42.9% year over year. The top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.87 billion.

Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD - Free Report) reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.92 in the fourth quarter of 2025, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.68. Royal Gold’s bottom line increased 18% year over year.

Royal Gold generated record revenues of $375 million, soaring 85% year over year. Stream revenues were $265 million in the December-end quarter, up year over year from $125 million. Royalty revenues were $111 million, growing 42.2% year over year.

Key Takeaways DLTR is expected to report weaker revenues but stronger earnings growth in the upcoming quarterly release.Dollar Tree benefits from multi-price expansion, store optimization and market share gains across categories.DLTR faces tariff-related cost pressures and macro uncertainty, affecting lower-income consumers. Dollar Tree, Inc. (DLTR - Free Report) is likely to register a decline in its top line when it reports fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results on March 16, before market open. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $5.5 billion, indicating a drop of 33.8% from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure.

The consensus estimate for earnings is pegged at $2.53 per share, indicating an increase of 19.9% from the year-ago period’s reported figure. The consensus mark has moved up by a penny in the past seven days.

For fiscal 2025, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $19.4 billion, indicating a decline of 37% from the prior-year quarter’s actual. The consensus estimate for earnings is pegged at $5.73 per share, indicating an increase of 12.4% from the year-ago period’s reported figure. The consensus mark has moved up by a penny in the past seven days.

DLTR has a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 29.1%, on average. In the last reported quarter, the Chesapeake, VA-based company’s earnings surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 11%.

Trends to Watch Before Dollar Tree’s Q4 ReleaseDLTR entered the fiscal fourth quarter with solid operating momentum. The company is expected to have witnessed strong performance, driven by sales growth across categories and market share gains. Dollar Tree has made significant progress over the years in optimizing its store portfolio through store openings, renovations, re-banners and closings. The expanded multi-price assortment, continued strength from higher-income customers and a healthy balance between traffic and ticket continue to support comps growth.

Strong performance from store conversions, openings, improved distribution center flow and the early traction of the Uber Eats partnership should have provided incremental support to fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 revenues.

On the last reported quarter’s earnings call, management is encouraged by the robust trends on value proposition and multi-price efforts. It is confident of its ability to mitigate the tough environment and accomplish profitability goals for the fiscal year.

For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the company projects net sales of $5.4-$5.5 billion, supported by expected comparable-store sales growth of 4-6%. Adjusted EPS is anticipated to be $2.40-$2.60. The fiscal fourth quarter is the company’s highest cash-generating quarter, owing to generally higher sales levels.

For fiscal 2025, the company projects net sales of $19.35-$19.45 billion, supported by comps growth of 5-5.5%. Adjusted EPS is projected to be $5.60-$5.80. Our model predicts comps growth of 5.1% for the fourth quarter and 5.3% for fiscal 2025.

However, Dollar Tree’s fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results are expected to reflect the environment of uncertainty that management emphasized on the latest earnings call. Despite strong discretionary and consumable spending in the fiscal third quarter, management has taken a cautious stance, given the volatile macroeconomic backdrop and rising financial pressures on lower-income consumers, who continue to face elevated living costs across categories.

A major factor weighing on the company’s performance is likely to have been the timing of tariff impacts. Tariff-related pressures have been leading to higher costs and remain concerning. The company’s fiscal 2025 outlook assumed unchanged tariff levels in the near term. However, gross margin expansion is expected to have been offset by higher tariff expenses, increased markdowns and elevated shrink levels.

Our model predicts gross profit to increase 12.1% for the fourth quarter and 11.9% for fiscal 2025. The gross margin is expected to expand 100 bps and 50 bps year over year, respectively, for the fourth quarter and fiscal 2025.

Dollar Tree has been witnessing higher selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for a while, driven by elevated depreciation expenses from store investments, increased store payroll from pricing initiatives and higher wages, and general liability claims. We expect adjusted SG&A expenses to increase 17% for the fourth quarter and 15.4% for fiscal 2025.

Dollar Tree’s Zacks Model FindingsOur proven model conclusively predicts an earnings beat for Dollar Tree this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat, which is exactly the case here. You can uncover the best stocks before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.

Dollar Tree currently has an Earnings ESP of +2.38% and a Zacks Rank of 3.

DLTR’s Stock Price & Valuation PictureFrom a valuation perspective, Dollar Tree shares present an attractive opportunity, trading at a discount relative to historical and industry benchmarks. With a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 17.23X, below the five-year median of 18X and the Retail-Discount Stores industry’s average of 33.34X, the company’s shares offer compelling value for investors seeking exposure to the sector.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Recent market movements show that Dollar Tree’s shares have declined 10% in the past three months against the industry’s 10.7% growth.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Other Stocks With the Favorable CombinationHere are some companies, which, according to our model, have the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat this season:

Five Below, Inc. (FIVE - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +0.63% and currently sports a Zacks Rank of 1. FIVE is likely to register top and bottom-line increases when it reports fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for its quarterly revenues is pegged at $1.71 million, indicating a 22.9% rise from the figure reported in the prior-year quarter. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

The consensus estimate for Five Below’s earnings is pegged at $3.99 per share, implying a 14.7% increase from the year-ago quarter. FIVE delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 62.1%, on average.

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +6.45% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present. The consensus estimate for Ulta Beauty’s fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 earnings is pegged at $7.99 per share, implying a decline of 5.6% from the year-ago quarter’s actual.

For Ulta Beauty’s quarterly revenues, the consensus mark is pegged at $3.83 billion, which indicates an increase of 9.9% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure. ULTA delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 15.7%, on average.

Dollar General (DG - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +5.38% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $10.8 billion, implying 4.7% growth from the year-ago quarter’s actual.

The consensus estimate for Dollar General earnings is pegged at $1.61 per share, implying a 4.2% decline from the year-ago quarter’s reported number. DG delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 22.9%, on average.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD - Free Report) , alias AB InBev, is pushing into the Beyond Beer category, which is emerging as a meaningful growth lever as the company adapts to evolving consumer preferences. Traditionally known for its global beer portfolio, the brewer is expanding into adjacent categories, such as ready-to-drink (RTD) cocktails, hard seltzers and flavored alcoholic beverages to capture demand beyond traditional beer consumption. According to the company’s recent update, the Beyond Beer portfolio gained strong momentum, with revenues rising 23% in 2025, supported by brands such as Cutwater, Nutrl and Mike’s Hard Lemonade.

The expansion reflects AB InBev’s broader strategy of participating across more drinking occasions and consumer segments. Demand for convenient, flavored and lower-alcohol beverages has been growing globally, particularly among younger consumers. By strengthening its Beyond Beer lineup, the company aims to capture this shift while complementing its core beer offerings. The strategy also aligns with AB InBev’s premiumization focus, as many RTD and spirit-based products command higher price points and can enhance the overall revenue mix.

Beyond Beer products are also helping the brewer maintain portfolio relevance in markets where beer consumption growth has moderated. Strong performances from brands like Cutwater and Mike’s Hard Lemonade contributed to portfolio momentum, while innovations in spirits-based RTDs further expanded the company’s presence in fast-growing beverage segments.

However, the category still represents a smaller portion of AB InBev’s overall business compared with its core beer operations. Sustaining growth will require continued innovation, strong brand investment and effective distribution through the company’s global network.

Overall, AB InBev’s Beyond Beer push appears to be more than a diversification experiment. With double-digit revenue growth and rising consumer interest in alternative alcoholic beverages, the segment is shaping up as a promising complementary growth driver, alongside the brewer’s traditional beer portfolio.

BUD’s Zacks Rank & Share Price PerformanceShares of this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) company have rallied 14.8% in the past three months, outperforming both the industry and the broader Consumer Staples sector’s rallies of 5.7% and 6.3%, respectively. The stock has also outpaced the S&P 500’s decline of 0.5% in the same period.

BUD Stock's 3-Month Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Is BUD a Value Play Stock?AB InBev currently trades at a forward 12-month P/E ratio of 16.87X, which is higher than the industry average of 15.17X and below the sector average of 17.35X. This valuation positions the stock at a premium relative to its industry peers, suggesting that investors may be pricing in stronger growth prospects, brand strength or operational efficiency compared with competitors.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Stocks to ConsiderKeurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP - Free Report) is a prominent integrated brand owner, manufacturer, and distributor of beverages across the United States, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Keurig’s 2026 sales and earnings suggests growth of 57.5% and 5.9%, respectively, from the year-ago reported figures. KDP delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 3.1%, on average.

Carlsberg (CABGY - Free Report) is a brewing company and has operations in Northern and Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and Asia. The company currently carries a Zacks Rank of 2.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Carlsberg’s 2026 sales and earnings indicates growth of 34.9% and 17.8%, respectively, from the year-ago reported numbers.

Heineken (HEINY - Free Report) is engaged in producing and distributing beverages, including beer, cider, soft drinks, and other beverages. The company currently has a Zacks Rank of 2.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Heineken’s 2026 sales implies a decline of 6.3% from the previous year’s reported number, while the consensus mark for EPS suggests growth of 18.2%.

Aave Oracle Glitch Causes $27M Liquidations: CAPO Misconfiguration Confirmed

Tim Hakki

Web 3 Journalist

Tim Hakki

Part of the Team Since

Feb 2024

About Author

A journalist and copywriter with a decade's experience across music, video games, finance and tech.

Has Also Written

Fact Checked by

CryptoNews Editorial Team

Author

CryptoNews Editorial Team

Part of the Team Since

Sep 2018

About Author

The CryptoNews editorial team is composed of seasoned writers specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. Their expertise ensures comprehensive, accurate, and insightful content for...

Has Also Written

Last updated: 

5 minutes ago

A misconfigured Oracle system in Aave triggered $27 million in forced liquidations on March 10, undervaluing wrapped staked Ether by 2.85% against its actual market rate.

According to the post-mortem by Chaos Labs, the CAPO oracle error caused Aave V3 Ethereum Core and Prime instances to apply an exchange rate of roughly 1.1939 wstETH-per-ETH when the live onchain rate was approximately 1.228, enough of a gap to push 34 high-leverage E-Mode positions below their liquidation thresholds automatically.

It resulted in the liquidation of 10,938 wstETH. The protocol says it incurred no bad debt and is moving to compensate all affected users.

The Damage: 34 Users, $27M in Liquidations, and 499 ETH in Bot ProfitsThe oracle glitch liquidated 34 users, with the total volume reaching $27 million in wstETH positions.

Liquidation bots moved quickly, capturing 499 ETH in bonuses, approximately $1.2 million, by executing against positions that should not have been eligible for liquidation at that moment.

Aave founder and CEO Stani Kulechov confirmed in a Wednesday post that the protocol generated no bad debt from the incident.

1/ stETH CAPO Misconfiguration

Today, a misconfiguration on Aave's CAPO oracle caused wstETH E-Mode liquidations, resulting in a loss of 345 ETH.

No bad debt was incurred, and all affected users will be fully reimbursed.

More below.

— Omer Goldberg (@omeragoldberg) March 10, 2026 Of the 499 ETH that went to liquidators, Aave recaptured 141 ETH ($285,000) through BuilderNet refunds and an additional 13 ETH in liquidation fees.

Those recovered funds will flow directly to affected users as compensation, with DAO treasury funds covering any remaining shortfall up to the full 345 ETH identified as the excess liquidation windfall.

Lido contributors confirmed the event had no connection to wstETH or the Lido staking protocol itself; the issue originated entirely within Aave’s oracle configuration layer.

With Ethereum price defending the $2,000 support zone around the time of the incident, the liquidation values were amplified by the broader market context for ETH-denominated collateral.

Discover: The best pre-launch crypto sales

Chaos Labs Confirms Aave CAPO Oracle Misconfiguration: Here Is What They FoundChaos Labs, Aave’s external risk management partner, confirmed the incident stemmed from what it described as an onchain configuration misalignment under differing onchain update constraints, not a design flaw in the CAPO system or in the core oracle infrastructure of Aave.

The team emphasized that Chaos Risk Oracles had processed over 1,200 payloads and more than 3,000 parameters across Aave markets without incident prior to March 10.

24-hour liquidations on Aave. Source: Chaos LabsChaos Labs quickly contained the situation: borrow caps on wstETH were reduced immediately, and snapshot parameters were manually realigned to restore oracle accuracy. Kulechov noted in his public statement that the configuration issue had already been remediated by the time the post-mortem was published, and praised the team’s response speed in limiting broader DeFi risk contagion.

The Aave governance post-mortem marks this as the first operational failure in CAPO’s deployment history on Aave V3, despite more than a year of live operation across multiple markets.

What Traders and Aave Users Are Watching NextThe immediate focus is on the full reimbursement timeline. Aave DAO service providers are finalizing compensation for all 34 affected users following the initial 141 ETH refund via BuilderNet, with a formal governance announcement expected shortly.

Beyond compensation, governance teams are conducting a broader review of CAPO parameters across all Aave markets, updating stale snapshots and building out enhanced monitoring to flag rate divergences before they reach liquidation-threshold proximity.

Whether that review produces binding parameter update standards or remains advisory is the governance question to watch.

If the DAO formalizes automated CAPO sync requirements and publishes updated risk oracle documentation, the incident may ultimately strengthen Aave’s operational credibility. If the review stalls at the discussion stage, the reputational cost will compound the financial one.

February’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) came in exactly as expected, offering no new catalyst for Federal Reserve rate cuts. However, fresh geopolitical pressures may complicate the picture going forward.

Bitcoin (BTC) slipped to $69,500 in the minutes after the release, a 1.2% decline over the prior 24 hours, as traders processed data that largely confirmed existing expectations.

Inflation Data Lands In Line With ExpectationsThe US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that CPI climbed 0.3% month-over-month in February and 2.4% on an annual basis. Both figures matched consensus forecasts and held flat from January’s 2.4% reading.

CPI 0.3% MoM, Exp. 0.3%
CPI Core 0.2% MoM, Exp. 0.2%

CPI 2.4% YoY, Exp. 2.4%
CPI Core 2.5% YoY, Exp. 2.5%

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 11, 2026 Core CPI, which strips out food and energy prices, rose 0.2% for the month, down slightly from January’s 0.3% gain. On an annual basis, core inflation held at 2.5%, also in line with forecasts.

US stock index futures were modestly lower across the board following the release. The 10-year Treasury yield ticked up to 4.19%, reflecting measured market repricing rather than a sharp reaction.

*TREASURY 30-YEAR YIELD RISES TO 4.83%, HIGHEST SINCE FEB. 10

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) March 11, 2026 Meanwhile, Bitcoin and gold slipped following the report.

Bitcoin, Gold and 10-Year US Treasuries Price Performance. Source: TradingView The report signals no surprises for the central bank, but markets will still monitor any Fed commentary for indications on interest rates or potential pauses in tightening.

Several Wall Street banks had anticipated steady headline inflation.

February CPI Forecasts From Wall Street Banks. Source: Nick Timiraos on XRate Cut Expectations Remain SubduedMeanwhile, the CME FedWatch data prices a 99.3% probability of no change at the March 18 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, with zero probability of a hike. The Fed’s current target rate sits at 350–375 basis points.

Fed Interest Rate Probabilities. Source: CME FedWatch ToolBefore today’s CPI print, interest rate bettors wagered a 97.4% probability of no change, an outlook that has only gained strength post-data release.

Odds of an April rate cut stood at just 10.9% at the time of the report, down sharply from 21% one month earlier. It therefore means that the in-line inflation print gave markets little reason to revise those expectations upward.

The Fed has maintained a data-dependent stance throughout its current tightening cycle, and February’s numbers provide no fresh urgency for easing.

Oil Prices Add a New VariableWhile February’s figures matched forecasts, they are already being overshadowed by more recent geopolitical developments.

Crude oil prices rose 4.2% to $87 per barrel on the day of the report, driven by escalating tensions tied to the conflict in Iran.

Energy prices feed directly into headline inflation data with a lag. This means that the February CPI reading may not reflect conditions the Fed will be weighing over the coming weeks.

How much weight policymakers place on the oil move versus the trend of moderating core inflation should become clearer after the Fed’s March meeting.

The general expectation is that officials will signal their next steps through updated projections and Chair Jerome Powell’s post-meeting remarks.

Dogecoin price is once again attracting attention across the crypto market as traders look for the next major opportunity in the memecoin sector. After weeks of consolidation and broader market uncertainty, DOGE is showing early signs of renewed interest. But beyond the price action, analysts believe something more significant may be forming.

A technical structure now appearing on Dogecoin’s higher timeframes closely resembles a pattern that historically appeared just before some of DOGE’s biggest rallies. At the same time, Elon Musk’s latest update about the upcoming X Money platform has revived speculation around Dogecoin’s potential role in digital payments.

With technical signals, on-chain activity, and social sentiment beginning to align, traders are now asking one key question: Is Dogecoin quietly preparing for another explosive move?

Analyst Says Dogecoin May Be Repeating a Historic Rally PatternAccording to an analyst, Dogecoin is currently printing what he describes as the “final pattern before a massive surge.” The analyst compared the current chart structure with previous market cycles and found striking similarities between the two setups. In past rallies, Dogecoin spent months consolidating within a tight range before momentum suddenly flipped bullish and triggered a powerful breakout.

The pattern visible on the 3-day DOGE chart suggests that the memecoin may once again be entering the final stage of accumulation. In earlier cycles, similar consolidation structures appeared shortly before Dogecoin experienced explosive price expansions driven by speculative demand and retail participation.

If history repeats, analysts believe Dogecoin price could be approaching another critical breakout phase. However, confirmation will only come if DOGE successfully breaks above key resistance levels.

Elon Musk’s X Money Launch Reignites Dogecoin SpeculationAdding further attention to Dogecoin is Elon Musk’s latest announcement regarding the X platform’s financial ecosystem. Musk recently revealed that early public access for “X Money” will launch next month, marking an important step toward transforming the social media platform into a broader financial and payments network.

Although Dogecoin was not explicitly mentioned in the announcement, Musk’s long-standing support for the memecoin quickly reignited speculation across the crypto community. Musk has repeatedly promoted Dogecoin in the past and has integrated DOGE payments into several businesses. Because of this history, developments connected to Musk or the X ecosystem often influence Dogecoin price sentiment. As a result, the X Money update has once again placed DOGE back into the spotlight among traders and investors.

On-Chain Data Shows Rising Whale ActivityOn-chain data is also revealing interesting activity behind Dogecoin’s current market structure. According to Santiment data, large Dogecoin transactions have increased noticeably over the past several weeks. Whale transaction counts, particularly transfers exceeding $100,000 and $1 million, have recorded multiple spikes throughout late February and early March.

Historically, rising whale transaction activity often appears during accumulation phases, when large investors begin repositioning before potential market moves. Wallet distribution metrics also highlight continued influence from large holders. Addresses holding 100,000 to 1 million DOGE currently control around 5.73% of the total supply, while wallets containing 1 million to 10 million DOGE hold roughly 7.12%.

For traders, such whale activity can sometimes precede periods of increased volatility, particularly when technical setups begin aligning with on-chain accumulation signals.

Dogecoin Price Analysis: Key Levels Traders Are WatchingDogecoin price remains within a prolonged consolidation phase following months of downward pressure. DOGE is currently stabilizing near a key demand zone while a descending resistance structure continues to cap upside momentum.

Key levels traders are watching include:

Support

$0.09 – $0.088 demand zoneResistance

$0.10 breakout level$0.13 major resistanceA confirmed breakout above the descending resistance trendline could signal a shift in momentum. If Dogecoin price manages to reclaim the $0.12 level, analysts believe the next upside targets could appear near $0.20 and $0.25, where previous supply zones exist.

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

BTC experienced minor initial volatility after the numbers went out.

The United States Labor Department released the highly anticipated Consumer Price Index numbers for February, the last such data before the upcoming FOMC meeting next week.

Interestingly, experts nailed the actual numbers, with a 0.3% increase for February and a 2.4% rise year-over-year.

The increase for the previous month was slightly higher than the number for January (0.2%). Core CPI, which excludes more volatile sectors like food and energy, rose 0.2%, also matching the forecasts. In contrast, January’s increase was slightly higher MoM (0.3%).

The single-largest component of the regular CPI, shelter, jumped by 0.2% monthly and 3% annually, while rent rose by 0.1%, which is the lowest monthly increase in over five years.

Given the matched expectations, experts now believe the US Federal Reserve will keep the key interest rates unchanged during its next FOMC meeting, scheduled for the following week.

Bitcoin’s price reacted with minor volatility immediately after the Labor Department published the data for February, going from $69,000 to $69,800, where it was stopped and pushed back to around $69,300 as of press time.

It appears that the inflation data does not impact its price moves as much as it used to, as global financial markets are focused on the ongoing war between the US and Israel on one side, and Iran on the other.

You may also like: Months More Bitcoin Consolidation Expected as Long-term Holder Activity Decreases Geopolitics Fail to Break Bitcoin: Analyst Eyes $80K Upside Ahead 29,000 BTC Withdrawn While Futures Shorts Continue to Rise: Data BTCUSD Mar 11. Source: TradingView Tags:

About the author

Jordan got into crypto in 2016 by trading and investing. He began writing about blockchain technology in 2017 and now serves as CryptoPotato's Assistant Editor-in-Chief. He has managed numerous crypto-related projects and is passionate about all things blockchain.

The pool is designed for institutional and public company miners, focusing on compliance and regulated infrastructure. Mar 11, 2026, 1:00 p.m.

Foundry Digital, one of largest Bitcoin mining pools by hashrate, said it plans to introduce a zcash (ZEC) mining pool by next month, expanding beyond BTC and bringing a large institutional operator into the privacy-focused network.

With the new pool, Foundry aims to offer zcash miners a U.S.-based platform designed around compliance checks, reporting standards and operational controls often required by public companies and large firms.

The move addresses what Foundry describes as a gap in Zcash infrastructure. While the cryptocurrency has existed for nearly a decade, much of its mining ecosystem still consists of smaller global pools that often operate outside formal compliance frameworks.

“Zcash has matured into an institutional-grade asset, but the mining infrastructure supporting it hasn’t kept pace,” Foundry CEO Mike Colyer said in a statement shared with CoinDesk.

Betting on privacyThe expansion comes as privacy-focused cryptocurrencies regain attention across the market as new crypto tax reporting rules, with threat of asset seizure, kicked in across the European Union at the turn of the year and as onchain analysis keeps developing, leading to growing demand for financial anonymity.

Zcash, along with other privacy coins including monero (XMR) and dash (DASH) has seen renewed interest that has helped their prices surge. ZEC has seen significant outperformance, up more than 670% in the last 12 month period, compared XMR’s 72% rise in the same period, while DASH is up 51%.

ZEC’s outperformance can likely be attributed to its hybrid privacy model, which makes shielded – completely anonymous – transactions optional with selective disclosure. This means that transactions can be transparent for custody and exchanges, and attracted accumulation from a Winklevoss-backed treasury firm as well as into the Grayscale Zcash Trust.

Foundry’s shift toward zcash also likely reflects broader changes in mining economics. Bitcoin mining profitability has tightened following the 2024 halving, which cut block rewards in half while mining difficulty surged.

Speaking to CoinDesk, Coyler pushed back on the idea the move is primarily a response to lowering bitcoin margins.

“We evaluate opportunities based on where institutional infrastructure is needed, not on bitcoin margins at any given moment,” he said. “Foundry’s bitcoin mining business is strong and remains our core foundation.”

The expansion, Coyler said, was over an identified gap in compliant Zcash infrastructure. “Institutional and public miners who want exposure to zcash have had no US-based, compliant, purpose-built infrastructure to do it through,” he added.

As for whether the move shows a broader multi-chain strategy, Coyler said the company’s focus is “squarely on bitcoin and zcash” for now, though he added that Foundry is “always evaluating opportunities” that align with its mission and the demands of institutional miners.

While the price of bitcoin saw a major rise to near $125,000 late last year, its price has since corrected to now stand at $69,500. That has seen hashprice, a measure of expected value of 1TH/s of hashing power a day, drop from over $60 to $30 per petahash.

As margins shrink, many large mining firms have begun exploring other proof-of-work networks to diversify revenue.

Zcash mining infrastructureZcash launched in 2016 as a privacy-focused cryptocurrency built on zero-knowledge proof technology. The network allows users to send transactions on a public blockchain while keeping key details private. Using a cryptographic method known as zk-SNARKs, Zcash can verify that a transaction is valid without revealing the sender, receiver or amount involved.

Like Bitcoin, the Zcash network relies on proof-of-work mining to secure its blockchain and miners use specialized hardware to solve complex mathematical puzzles to help secure the network. When a miner or mining pool solves one of these puzzles, it adds a new block of transactions to the chain and earns a reward in newly issued ZEC tokens along with transaction fees.

Zcash blocks are produced about every 75 seconds, faster than bitcoin’s blocks which are produced every 10 minutes. Still, both shared a supply cap of 21 million coins. The mining process uses an algorithm called Equihash, which differs from Bitcoin’s SHA-256 and was designed to require large amounts of memory during computation.

Network difficulty, which helps the time between block production remain consistent, means the probability of solving a block alone is low. As a result miners bundle together in what are known as mining pools, in which participants combine computing power and share rewards based on how much work they contribute. Large pools can influence the stability and decentralization of a network because they control significant portions of its total hashrate.

Foundry’s zcash poolFoundry said its zcash pool will include identity verification checks for participants through rigorous know-your-customer and anti-money laundering compliance, transparent payout calculations and reporting tools aimed at institutional users. It'll feature a dedicated support team and its operations will be based in the United States.

The company plans to apply the same operational framework used by its bitcoin pool, which has undergone SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance audits, it said.

Mining rewards will be distributed through transparent Zcash addresses, not shielded ones, the company said. The pool will be paying miners on a Pay Per Last N Shares (PPLNS) model, which Coyler said is “fully auditable” and provides detailed data supporting daily payment reconciliation.

Foundry didn’t disclose the fee for miners, saying only it will offer “competitive pool fee rates.” There will be no minimum hashrate threshold to join the pool, Coyler said, noting that the Zcash mining ecosystem is still emerging.

The company expects demand from miners that already operate in regulated environments such as North America. Many of those firms rely on formal reporting systems and compliance programs to meet corporate governance requirements.

If the zcash pool launches on schedule in 2026, it would mark one of the largest institutional entries into the Zcash mining ecosystem to date. Other major mining pools operating within it include F2Pool, 2Miners, and ViaBTC.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

More For You

CoinDesk Research looks into how Pudgy Penguins disrupts traditional toys market via a phygital model. With 2M+ units sold, they scale via global partnerships and events.

What to know:

Disrupting a Stagnant Market: Pudgy Penguins is utilizing a "Negative CAC" model to challenge the traditional $31.7B licensed toy industry by treating physical merchandise as a profitable user acquisition tool rather than just a final product.More For You

Binance sues Wall Street Journal as newspaper says U.S. Dept. of Justice is investigating Iran transactions

36 minutes ago

The situation adds pressure to Binance, which is already operating under a compliance monitor following its $4.3 billion anti-money laundering and sanctions settlement in 2023.

What to know:

Binance filed a defamation lawsuit against Dow Jones, publisher of the Wall Street Journal, accusing it of falsely claiming the exchange fired staff who raised compliance concerns and mishandled Iran-linked transactions.The WSJ on Wednesday said U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether Iranian networks used the exchange to move funds in violation of American sanctions, though it is unclear if Binance itself is a target.The dispute comes as Binance, already operating under a U.S.-appointed compliance monitor after a 2023 guilty plea on sanctions and anti-money-laundering violations, insists it reported suspicious activity and found no direct transactions with Iranian entities on its platform.

A fresh cluster of on-chain and fund-flow data is feeding a familiar XRP market question: are buyers using the recent weakness to accumulate? New figures highlighted by CryptoQuant contributor Darkfost suggest that Binance withdrawal activity has surged just as spot XRP ETFs continue to absorb capital despite the token’s pullback.

XRP Accumulation In Progress? Darkfost framed the move against a broader altcoin backdrop that still looks selective rather than expansive. “Despite a period of uncertainty that has been quite detrimental to the cryptocurrency market, altcoins are starting to show some early signs of resilience,” he wrote. “Total3, which represents the market capitalization of altcoins excluding Ethereum, is currently consolidating within a range between $640B and $740B, with a performance of around +11% since the beginning of February.”

That matters because his XRP read is not based on a broad-based altcoin revival. It is based on capital concentration. As Darkfost put it, “despite a complicated macroeconomic environment and still limited market liquidity, a portion of capital remains positioned in altcoins.” But with liquidity still constrained and the listed universe of tokens continuing to expand, he argued that “asset selection is becoming increasingly important.”

Within that framework, XRP has started to stand out. A CryptoQuant chart tracking XRP Ledger exchange withdrawal transactions from Binance shows several sharp spikes in recent weeks, with the most notable move exceeding 14,000 transactions on March 6. Those bursts came while XRP’s USD price remained under pressure, a pattern some traders often read as coins leaving exchange inventory rather than moving onto venues for sale.

Darkfost was careful not to overstate the signal, but his interpretation was clear. “At the moment, a few positive signals are emerging around XRP,” he wrote. “The number of XRP withdrawal transactions on Binance has shown several sudden spikes in recent days, including more than 14,000 transactions on March 6. This type of movement may indicate that some investors are accumulating and then choosing to transfer their tokens to private wallets rather than keeping them on the exchange.”

XRP exchange withdrawing transactions on Binance | Source: X @Darkfost_Coc The second leg of the story is ETF demand. Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart said spot XRP products “have actually held up pretty well despite the massive pullback in price” and have taken in roughly $1.4 billion in cumulative inflows since launch. A Bloomberg Intelligence chart shared by Seyffart shows flows rising from about $150 million on Nov. 13, 2025 to $1.44 billion by March 4, 2026, suggesting that allocations continued even as market conditions became less forgiving.

Seyffart also pointed to the limited visibility around who exactly is buying. “Who are these buyers/holders?” he wrote. “Well we only know a small portion of them because the vast majority don’t file 13Fs. But here are the holders as of 12/31/2025.” The Bloomberg Intelligence holder table shows Goldman Sachs Group at the top with $153.8 million in exposure, equal to 83.6 million XRP. Millennium Management follows with $23.1 million and 12.5 million XRP, while smaller positions appear across firms including Citadel Advisors, Jane Street, DRW Securities and others.

Institutional XRP ETF holders | Source: X @JSeyff That combination is what gives the current XRP setup its edge. On one side, there is exchange-withdrawal activity that may point to coins moving off Binance and into private wallets. On the other, there is steady ETF absorption and at least some evidence of institutional exposure building through traditional reporting channels.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.3768.

XRP trades below the 200-week EMA, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Trading activity for Dogecoin has increased dramatically; in recent sessions, total volume has increased by more than 100%. The increase in liquidity raises concerns about whether traders are starting to pay more attention to meme coins, at a time when the larger cryptocurrency market is trying to stabilize following months of pressure.

DOGE aims lowEven with the increase in volume, Dogecoin's price movement is still quite controlled. The asset is currently trading at about $0.092, exhibiting very little movement in relation to the volume of trading activity. The price has slightly declined over the past day, which is indicative of the continuous conflict between buyers trying to start a recovery and sellers keeping control of the overall trend.

DOGE/USDT Chart by TradingViewDogecoin is still technically stuck in a downtrend that started at the end of last year. The price is trading below a number of important moving averages, and the chart structure displays a steady series of lower highs and lower lows. As dynamic resistance, these indicators keep sloping downward, preventing the formation of significant upward momentum.

HOT Stories

Pure volume not enoughThe increase in trading volume is still significant, though. Increased trading activity frequently indicates that traders are starting to get ahead of possible volatility. Despite a weak chart structure, Dogecoin's long-short ratios on the derivatives market are still very bullish, indicating that many traders anticipate a rebound.

You Might Also Like

Price movements can become erratic when the market is dominated by long exposure. Heavily leveraged long positions may be forced to close if the anticipated rally does not happen, which could intensify downward pressure.

Dogecoin is still profiting from being one of the most well-known meme coins on the market. When traders start shifting their capital back into speculative assets, periods of increasing volume frequently occur. 

In the past, meme coins have typically experienced spikes in activity when the market is feeling optimistic again or when Bitcoin has stabilized following a correction.

Dogecoin seems to be going through a transition right now. The price has not yet confirmed a significant change in trend, but the significant increase in volume suggests increasing engagement.  

Cardano price is hovering near $0.25 support as traders watch whether ADA can hold the level while Charles Hoskinson discusses potential buybacks.

Summary

Cardano is still under selling pressure with a continued weak trend and declining derivatives activity. Charles Hoskinson suggested a new funding model where the Cardano treasury invests in ecosystem projects and may use returns for ADA buybacks. The strategy focuses on increasing developer incentives and expanding real-world applications to strengthen the Cardano ecosystem. Cardano (ADA) moved lower on Wednesday as sellers kept pressure on the market. At the time of writing, ADA was trading at $0.2585, down about 2% over the past 24 hours.

During the past week, the token traded between $0.2492 and $0.2828. The range has narrowed as the market cooled after earlier volatility. ADA has lost around 5% over the last seven days, and the longer trend remains weak. Since January, the token is down roughly 20% in 2026 so far.

Market activity has not changed much despite the price decline. Daily trading volume reached $799 million, only 0.22% higher than the previous session.

CoinGlass data shows some cooling in derivatives markets. Open interest slipped 3.57% to $419 million, which often happens when traders close positions during uncertain price action.

Hoskinson hints at ADA buybacks and new funding model In a recent video update, Charles Hoskinson shared new details about how the Cardano ecosystem may be funded in the coming years.

According to Hoskinson, the network has spent years building its core infrastructure. The next step, he said, is to focus more on useful applications and better user experience. Without that shift, strong infrastructure alone will not attract users.

Developers and dApp teams could receive stronger incentives under the proposed model. One idea being discussed involves the Cardano treasury investing in a group of projects across the ecosystem, including DeFi platforms and other applications.

If the plan moves forward, returns from those investments could be used in part to buy ADA from the open market. Hoskinson described this as a possible buyback mechanism that may support the token while also funding ecosystem growth.

The proposal reflects a change in approach. Instead of relying mostly on grants, the treasury may begin making strategic investments designed to increase activity on the network.

Hoskinson has said that 2026 will be an important year for execution, with attention shifting toward real-world utility and stronger dApp ecosystems.

Technical analysis: ADA holds near key support On the charts, Cardano is trading close to the lower Bollinger Band, which often appears when markets face short-term selling pressure.

The overall trend still points downward. Over the past several weeks, the chart has produced lower highs and lower lows, a pattern that usually marks a continuing downtrend.

Cardano daily chart. Credit: crypto.news Price also remains below the Bollinger midline near $0.27, which has acted as resistance during recent attempts to recover.

Volatility has started to contract slightly as the Bollinger Bands move closer together. Periods like this often come before a stronger move once volatility returns.

Momentum indicators remain weak. The relative strength index is hovering near 40–45, a level that suggests sellers still hold the advantage, though the market is not deeply oversold.

For now, $0.25 is the key level to watch. The market has tested this support several times in recent sessions. If it breaks, price could slide toward $0.23 or even $0.22.

On the other hand, buyers would need to push ADA back above $0.27 to improve the short-term outlook. That level aligns with the Bollinger midline and has acted as a barrier during the recent downtrend.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Adam Back, the founder and CEO of Blockstream, has waded into the debate about whether or not Strategy Inc’s Bitcoin model is good for the market. This debate comes as few people believe the massive accumulation of Bitcoin creates potential centralization concerns.

Bitcoin is a free marketHours ago, an X user with the handle @FreedomMemesIRL noted that he was getting frustrated with Michael Saylor and Strategy. 

He posed a rhetorical question as to how he could be buying billions of dollars worth of Bitcoin with no impact on the price of the coin. He also pointed to the fact that Bitcoin was supposed to be widely distributed and not slowly concentrated in one company’s hands. In his assessment, he feels this is wrong.

As a long-term advocate of Bitcoin, Adam Back proposed a simple solution to the complaints, which is to "buy more" if the situation proves inconvenient. The early Bitcoin pioneer attested to the fact that Bitcoin operates on a "free market" that allows anyone to gain exposure with no restrictions.

Before the launch of spot Bitcoin ETF products, retail investors largely controlled the supply, with more intense volatility on record. With institutions now buying, concerns around market manipulation are beginning to rise.

Bitcoin scarcity at playA few days ago, the total Bitcoin mined topped 20,000,000 units out of the total of 21,000,000 BTC. This feat comes despite the occasional shift in mining difficulty and the gradual pivot to the AI industry by miners.

You Might Also Like

With accumulation growing, a massive liquidity crunch is currently building for Bitcoin, one that proponents believe would help uplift the price of the asset in the mid- to long term.

As of writing time, the price of Bitcoin was trading for $69,386, down 1.5% in the past 24 hours. The coin has continued to trade in a range-bound motion amid macroeconomic instability.

Brera Holdings announced a rebrand to Solmate Infrastructure and plans to build a UAE-focused Solana infrastructure. It announced a reverse stock split to align with institutional investor preferences. Solmate Infrastructure, which operates as Nasdaq-listed Brera Holdings, has reinforced its commitment to the Solana ecosystem by announcing a plan to build a Solana hub in the UAE that aims to expand blockchain infrastructure and attract institutional participation in the region’s growing digital asset sector.

As per the official release, which also includes a corporate rebranding, the company is aligning its name and structure, as it includes a formal change in its legal entity name from Brera Holdings PLC to Solmate Infrastructure PLC.

Which reflects the company’s transformation to a Solana-based digital infrastructure model. In addition, the company will revise its constitutional documents to reflect its importance in digital asset infrastructure and treasury strategy. 

Further, Marco Santori, Solmate CEO, added, “By focusing our capital and corporate identity on Solana, we are positioning ourselves to be a central player in the region’s rapidly expanding digital economy. This is not just a name change, it is the evolution of a specialized infrastructure firm built for the future of capital markets.”

Also, the company launched a reverse stock split to bring its shares into a more normal trading range that institutional investors demand. The move is also mainly to increase operational flexibility.

The company also proposed a 10-for-1 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares, anticipated to take effect shortly after the shareholder meeting scheduled for April 7, 2026. Where every 10 Class A and Class B ordinary shares with a nominal value of $0.05 will be consolidated into one share with a nominal value of $0.50. Where the reverse split will apply equally to all shareholders and will not change their overall ownership percentage, except for minor adjustments.

Meanwhile, Solana traded at $85.50, a 1.86% down in the last 24 hours,  while the daily trading volume fell by over 2%, the altcoin remained around 1.5% lower on the weekly chart.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ripple Plans BC Payments Acquisition to Expand in Australia  

Writer with roots in journalism and international relations, actively exploring blockchain and crypto, with curiosity for the field and a passion for simplifying complex ideas.

Stellar (XLM), down 1.6% from Tuesday, joined Hedera (HBAR) as an underperformer.

Bitcoin traded near $69,000 on March 11, 2026, hovering inside a tight consolidation band after failing to hold a push toward the $71,600 area. Across the one-hour, four-hour and daily charts, price action remained largely range-bound as oscillators and moving averages collectively pointed to a neutral technical outlook.

TORRANCE, Calif., March 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Navitas Semiconductor (Nasdaq: NVTS), an industry leader in next-generation GaNFast™ gallium nitride (GaN) and GeneSiC™ silicon carbide (SiC) power semiconductors, today announced the launch of two new packages: top-side cooled QDPAK and a low-profile TO-247-4L with asymmetrical leads in its 5th generation GeneSiC™ technology platform. The latest 1200 V SiC MOSFET products set a new industry benchmark for power density and ruggedness.

5th generation Trench-Assisted Planar (TAP) technology
This technology delivers 35% improvements in RDS,ON × QGD figure of merit (FoM), and about 25% improvement in QGD / QGS ratio. When coupled with stable high threshold voltage, VGS,TH, of >3 V, this technology ensures immunity against parasitic turn-on, providing a robust and predictable switching performance.

Top-side cooled (TSC) QDPAK
The QDPAK package is designed to overcome the thermal limitations of conventional PCB cooling by enabling heat dissipation directly through the top of the package to the heatsink. This optimized thermal path significantly improves heat dissipation efficiency and enables smaller system footprints. The package also minimizes parasitic inductance, supporting cleaner switching and higher efficiency at high frequencies. In addition, the QDPAK platform supports larger die sizes and higher current capability, facilitating the ultra-low RDS(ON) values for high-power applications, while its compact surface-mount profile enables scalable high-volume automated assembly.

Compact footprint: Features a 15 mm x 21 mm area with an ultra-low height of only 2.3 mm.Enhanced creepage: Optimized with a groove in the package mold compound that extends creepage to 5 mm without trading off the area of the exposed top-side thermal pad.High-voltage integration: Supports up to 1000 VRMS applications with an epoxy molding compound (EMC) featuring a Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) of >600.Thermal integration: Designed for easier system-level thermal integration via top-side cooling. Low-profile TO-247-4-LP
The low-profile TO-247-4-LP through-hole package variant is an optimized package for power electronics systems where vertical clearance is limited, such as high-density AI power racks. By minimizing the height of the package on the PCBA, this package enables higher power density when compared with systems made with a standard TO-247-4 package.

Density optimized: Provides a reduced vertical footprint on the PCBA to support compact form-factor requirements where conventional TO-247-4 package height is a constraint.Manufacturing precision: Optimized with asymmetrical leads (thin leads for gate and Kelvin-source) to improve PCBA manufacturing tolerances.AI Data Center ready: Specifically targeted at applications like AI data center power supplies, where form-factor and maximum allowable height are critical. “Our customers are pushing the boundaries of what is possible in AI data center and energy infrastructure applications," said Paul Wheeler, VP & GM of the SiC business unit at Navitas. "The introduction of top-side cooled QDPAK, and low-profile TO-247-4-LP packages is a direct response to the need for 'more power in less space'”.

A white paper on the Trench-Assisted Planar technology is available for free download from the Navitas website.

Part NumberPackageVDS (V)RDS,ON (mΩ)G5R06MT12QPQDPAK12006.5G5R12MT12QPQDPAK120012G5R06MT12LKTO-247-4-LP12006.5G5R12MT12LKTO-247-4-LP120012
For further information, please visit –

Navitas GeneSiC MOSFETs: https://navitassemi.com/genesic-mosfets-products/5th Generation Trench-Assisted Planar (TAP) SiC MOSFET technology: https://navitassemi.com/navitas-unveils-5th-generation-sic-trench-assisted-planar-tap-technology/ To request samples, please contact a Navitas representative or write to [email protected].

*Navitas uses the term ‘AEC-Plus’ to indicate parts exceeding AEC-Q101 and JEDEC standards for reliability testing based on Navitas test results.

About Navitas
Navitas Semiconductor (Nasdaq: NVTS) is a next-generation power semiconductor leader in gallium nitride (GaN) and IC integrated devices, and high-voltage silicon carbide (SiC) technology, driving innovation across AI data centers, energy and grid infrastructure, performance computing, and industrial electrification. With more than 30 years of combined expertise in wide bandgap technologies, GaNFast™ power ICs integrate GaN power, drive, control, sensing, and protection, delivering faster power delivery, higher system density, and greater efficiency. GeneSiC™ high-voltage SiC devices leverage patented trench-assisted planar technology to provide industry-leading voltage capability, efficiency, and reliability for medium-voltage grid and infrastructure applications. Navitas has over 300 patents issued or pending and is the world’s first semiconductor company to be CarbonNeutral®-certified.

Navitas Semiconductor, GaNFast, GaNSense, GaNSafe, GeneSiC, and the Navitas logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Navitas Semiconductor Limited or affiliates. All other brands, product names and marks are or may be trademarks or registered trademarks used to identify products or services of their respective owners.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are attempts to predict or indicate future events or trends or similar statements that are not a reflection of historical fact. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “we expect,” or “are expected to be,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are made based on estimates and forecasts of financial and performance metrics, projections of market opportunity and market share and current indications of customer interest, all of which are based on various assumptions, whether or not identified in this press release. All such statements are based on current expectations of the management of Navitas and are not predictions of actual future performance. Forward-looking statements are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to serve as, and must not be relied on by any investor as, a guarantee, an assurance, a prediction or a definitive statement of fact or probability. Actual events and circumstances are difficult or impossible to predict and will differ from assumptions and expectations. Many actual events and circumstances that affect performance are beyond the control of Navitas, and forward-looking statements are subject to a number of uncertainties. Our business is subject to certain risks that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, or the value of our securities. . For Navitas, these and other risk factors are discussed in the Risk Factors section of our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, as updated in the Risk Factors section of our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and in other documents we file with the SEC. If any of these risks, as discussed in more detail in our SEC reports, materialize or if our assumptions underlying forward-looking statements prove to be incorrect, actual results could differ materially from the results implied by these forward-looking statements. Examples of some of these risk factors include:

Risks Related to High-Power Markets: We intend to focus on AI data centers, performance computing, energy and grid infrastructure, and industrial electrification, and de-emphasize mobile and consumer products. We may not successfully execute our strategic transition to these new markets and customer applications, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. This strategic realignment entails significant operational, technical, and market risks. Our success in these markets depends on factors including our ability to (i) develop and scale semiconductor solutions that meet demanding power, efficiency, and performance requirements of our customers; (ii) compete against established incumbents with substantial R&D and manufacturing resources; (iii) anticipate rapidly evolving customer needs and technological standards in these high-power and high-performance segments; and (iv) secure design wins and long-term supply agreements in new and unfamiliar market segments.Market Acceptance and Addressable Market Uncertainty: The demand for our products, and our customers’ products, in new or emerging markets is difficult to forecast, as customer preferences may not be fully known and can evolve rapidly. Further, demand for our products depends on the acceptance of underlying new and developing system architectures. For example, our predictions for the use of GaN- and SiC-based products in 800V AI data center power applications depend on assumptions regarding the acceptance and growth of 800V systems themselves.Unpredictable Competitive Dynamics and Industry Conditions: To the extent our products reshape or create new market landscapes, the competitive environment may evolve in unexpected ways. For example, new competitors may emerge, or traditional competitors with established R&D and manufacturing resources, and long-standing customer relationships, may choose to offer competitive GaN or high-voltage SiC solutions. In addition, the semiconductor sector is known for cyclical volatility. This inherent unpredictability is amplified in new and emerging markets, where demand can swing sharply due to macroeconomic events, supply chain shocks, regulatory changes, or technology cycles.Other Risk Factors: Other risk factors include Navitas’ ability to diversify its customer base and develop relationships in new markets or regions; the possibility that the expected growth of our business will not be realized, or will not be realized within expected time periods, due to the above factors as well as others; Navitas’ ability to scale its technology into new markets and applications; the effects of competition on Navitas’ business, including actions of competitors with an established presence and resources in markets we hope to penetrate or by competitors to take market share in the markets we are deprioritizing; the level of demand in our customers’ end markets and our customers’ ability to predict such demand, both generally and with respect to successive generations of products or technology; Navitas’ ability to attract, train and retain key qualified personnel; changes in government trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and the regulation of cross-border investments, particularly involving the United States and China; other regulatory developments in the United States, China and other countries; the impact of events such as epidemics and pandemics in locations where our products are manufactured and sold; and Navitas’ ability to protect its intellectual property rights. Contact Information
Navitas Semiconductor
Vipin Bothra, VP Solution Marketing and Partnerships
[email protected]

Investor Contacts
Leanne Sievers | Brett Perry
Shelton Group
[email protected]

A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/dee05536-da56-418b-9462-05df1fceb632

Navitas Adds Top-Side Cooled QDPAK and Low-Profile TO-247-4L to its Package Line-Up in the Latest 5t... QDPAK and Low-profile TO247 in the latest GeneSiC™ 5th Generation Trench-Assisted Planar SiC MOSFET ...

March 11, 2026 08:30 ET  | Source: VisionWave Holdings, Inc.

News Summary

VisionWave Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: VWAV) announced the completion of Phase One of its strategic transaction with SaverOne 2014 Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVRE), establishing VisionWave’s 19.99% ownership stake in SaverOne under the company’s previously announced definitive agreement dated January 26, 2026, and advances the path toward potential 51% ownership

WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif., March 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- VisionWave Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: VWAV) today announced the completion of Phase One of its previously announced strategic transaction with SaverOne 2014 Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVRE). The Phase One closing occurred on March 5, 2026, establishing VisionWave’s initial ownership position of approximately 19.99% in SaverOne pursuant to the companies’ definitive agreement announced January 26, 2026. The agreement provides a framework for potential additional phases that may increase VisionWave’s ownership in SaverOne to approximately 51%, subject to the achievement of technology integration and commercialization milestones.

The Phase One closing activates the RF sensing layer of VisionWave’s developing multi-domain sensing architecture, which integrates advanced sensing technologies, artificial intelligence infrastructure, computational acceleration and autonomous systems.

Key Highlights

Phase One closing completed March 5, 2026VisionWave acquired 19.99% ownership in SaverOneTransaction governed by January 26, 2026 definitive agreementFramework provides path toward potential 51% ownershipIntegration supports VisionWave’s AI-driven autonomous defense platform Technology Demonstrations

SaverOne’s RF sensing technology has been demonstrated in real-world environments illustrating the ability to detect wireless signal activity and identify pedestrian presence in conditions including limited visibility and non-line-of-sight scenarios.

Video demonstrations of the technology can be viewed here:

RF Detection Demonstration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60bMQYA9hkQ

Technology Overview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4tmkFhxGU0

Detection Demonstration

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haiv5zlXeeY

These demonstrations illustrate how RF sensing technologies may complement conventional optical sensing systems by providing detection capabilities based on wireless signal analysis.

Activating the RF Sensing Layer of VisionWave’s Platform

Completion of Phase One represents an expansion of VisionWave’s sensing architecture and marks the activation of the RF sensing layer within the Company’s multi-domain sensing platform.

VisionWave’s architecture integrates multiple sensing modalities including:

RF detection technologiesautonomous aerial and ground systemsartificial intelligence processing infrastructurehigh-performance computational acceleration The platform is designed to support advanced situational awareness capabilities across complex operational environments.

RF Sensing and the Electromagnetic Environment

Modern security and defense environments increasingly involve complex electromagnetic signal activity generated by wireless devices, drones, sensors and communication systems. RF-based sensing technologies analyze these signal environments and identify electronic emissions that may indicate the presence of devices, vehicles or aerial platforms. VisionWave intends to evaluate how RF detection capabilities may complement its broader sensing initiatives including counter-drone detection technologies and autonomous systems platforms.

Growing Demand for Advanced Sensing Platforms

Governments and infrastructure operators worldwide are increasing investment in advanced sensing and situational awareness technologies designed to detect emerging threats and support autonomous systems. Platforms integrating multiple sensing modalities—including RF detection, autonomous system sensors and AI-driven analytics—are becoming an important component of next-generation defense and security architectures.

Transaction Structure

The SaverOne transaction is structured in three phases pursuant to the definitive agreement announced January 26, 2026.

Phase One – Completed March 5, 2026.

VisionWave acquired approximately 19.99% of SaverOne.

Phase Two – Integration Milestone.

Phase Three – Commercial Deployment Milestone.

Potential increase in VisionWave’s ownership to approximately 51%.

Management Commentary

Douglas Davis, Interim Executive Chairman, VisionWave

“The completion of Phase One represents an important milestone in VisionWave’s strategy to build an integrated sensing and autonomy technology platform. Integrating RF sensing technologies with autonomous systems and artificial intelligence infrastructure expands the platform’s ability to support advanced situational awareness capabilities.”

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the completion of Phase One of the SaverOne transaction, the potential for additional phases and increased ownership to approximately 51%, technology integration milestones, activation and expansion of the RF sensing layer, future demonstrations or commercialization of RF-enhanced solutions, and the Company’s strategic initiatives. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. Forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as "believe," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "expect," "should," "would," "plan," "project," "forecast," "predict," and similar expressions, or by statements that events or trends "may," "will," or "could" occur. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied, including but not limited to risks related to the achievement of future integration and commercialization milestones, satisfaction of closing conditions for subsequent phases, regulatory approvals (including Nasdaq and Israeli regulatory requirements), potential delays or failures in technology integration, geopolitical tensions in Israel and the surrounding region, integration challenges, market acceptance of RF-based sensing in defense applications, competition in advanced sensing technologies, and other risks described in the Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this press release and in the Company's SEC filings. VisionWave undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

Contacts:

VWAV - Investor Contact: [email protected]

Website: https://www.vwav.inc