Market Signal Briefing

Spain’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Bit2Me, recorded €5.3 billion (approximately $6.24 billion) in trading volume in 2025, marking an eightfold increase since 2023. The surge reflects the company’s strategic transition from a retail-focused crypto platform to a key provider of blockchain infrastructure for banks, financial institutions, and law enforcement agencies.

Bit2Me’s business-to-business (B2B) revenue has grown significantly, rising from 18% of total revenue in 2023 to 27% in 2025. One of its fastest-growing segments is crypto-backed loans, which climbed 672% year-over-year. According to CFO Pablo Casadio, the crypto industry is entering a new phase centered on financial infrastructure, and Bit2Me is positioning itself to capitalize on that shift.

Backed by major institutions including Bankinter, Unicaja, Cecabank, Telefónica, and Tether, the exchange generated $25 million in revenue last year. A major contributor was its API solution, which enables banks and institutions to outsource cryptocurrency trading, custody, and compliance operations. Cecabank has already integrated Bit2Me’s infrastructure to deliver digital asset services to regional banks, complementing a liquidity partnership involving BBVA’s Turkish subsidiary, Garanti BBVA Kripto.

Bit2Me became the first Spanish crypto exchange to secure an EU Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license, investing 3,000 hours and €2.5 million in regulatory compliance. Although this temporarily pushed EBITDA into negative territory, the license has strengthened its credibility and supports expansion plans into Portugal, Italy, France, and Germany. The company is also evaluating opportunities in the U.S. and Middle East markets.

In addition, Bit2Me serves as a crypto liquidation partner for the Spanish government, converting seized digital assets into euros. In 2025, it processed €1.5 million in confiscated cryptocurrency in collaboration with Interpol, Europol, and Spanish police, using Chainalysis for blockchain traceability. This direct liquidation model mirrors the U.S. Marshals Service’s arrangement with Coinbase, further solidifying Bit2Me’s role in regulated crypto infrastructure.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Dogecoin has pushed a cycle-style positioning metric to a level never seen before in its history, and the chart’s context suggests the market has only been in comparable territory twice, both times near major cycle lows.
Alphractal founder and CEO Joao Wedson said DOGE has now crossed a key threshold in his “Number of Days Spent at a Profit” indicator.

“For the first time, Dogecoin has accumulated more than 1,100 days in the past where the price was higher than today’s level,” Wedson wrote on X alongside the chart. “The Number of Days Spent at a Profit measures how many historical days traded above the current price, reflecting market memory and the aggregated positioning of holders over time. The higher the value, the longer the historical period that was traded at levels above the current price.”

Dogecoin: Number of days spent at a profit | Source: X @joao_wedson The indicator is straightforward: it counts how many prior days in DOGE’s trading history printed prices above the current level. A higher reading implies today’s price sits below a larger share of Dogecoin’s historical “tape,” which can be interpreted as an expanded footprint of prior trading levels above spot—what Wedson calls “market memory.”

What This Could Mean For Dogecoin The chart adds an important historical tell. Before this latest surge toward the 1,100+ day milestone, Dogecoin only moved above the 800-day level twice. Those two instances occurred around the March 2020 bottom and the October 2023 bottom, according to the chart and Wedson’s framing.

In both historical cases, the move above 800 days coincided with a major turning point that was followed by parabolic runs in subsequent months. From the March 2020 low to the November 2021 peak, DOGE rallied from about $0.0011 to its all-time high near $0.76, a gain of more than 65,000%. From the October 2023 low to December 2024, DOGE rose roughly 750%, climbing from about $0.0569 to $0.4846.

Wedson emphasized that this is not a signal about an intraday swing but a longer-horizon condition. “This is a structural cycle metric, not just a short-term move,” he said—positioning the new 1,100+ day milestone as a regime-level datapoint about where today’s price sits versus Dogecoin’s historical distribution.

The open question from here is whether this unprecedented reading will behave like prior extremes, where elevated “days above current price” aligned with cycle lows, or whether the market’s current structure breaks that historical rhyme.

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09705.

DOGE closed the week above the Oct. 10 low, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com

Grant Cardone, the renowned sales guru and real estate mogul, has just confirmed that he has gone “full steam ahead” into the crypto market. During a recent podcast interview, Cardone revealed that he has developed a hybrid model that uses discounts obtained from real estate acquisitions to purchase crypto assets, setting an initial accumulation goal of 10,000 BTC.

This innovative proposal seeks to combine the cash flow from physical properties with the parabolic growth potential of digital assets, creating a “protective shield” against inflation. Cardone argues that owning Bitcoin alone is insufficient without a business behind it to generate interest; therefore, he uses his real estate rental income to finance his digital exposure without compromising the stability of his traditional portfolio.

The market will closely observe whether this model succeeds in attracting more institutional investors, considering that 80% of his current partners had never traded cryptocurrencies before. Analysts will monitor the progress of his ambitious accumulation target, as the entrepreneur plans to expand his goal to 50,000 BTC over a seven-to-ten-year investment horizon.

Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GBiPA7e0YA

Disclaimer: Crypto Economy Flash News is compiled from official and public sources verified by our editorial team. Its purpose is to provide quick information on relevant events within the crypto and blockchain ecosystem. This information does not constitute financial advice or investment recommendations. We always recommend verifying the official channels of each project before making related decisions.

Step Finance and SolanaFloor Shut Down After Devastating Hack Prefer us on Google

Step Finance, SolanaFloor, and Remora Markets are shutting down after a major treasury hack.The breach drained millions in SOL and collapsed the STEP token, leaving no recovery path.Both platforms were early pillars of Solana’s DeFi infrastructure and media ecosystem.Step Finance and SolanaFloor, two early Solana ecosystem platforms, have announced they are shutting down operations effective immediately after the treasury hack that hit Step Finance at the end of January.

Step Finance said it explored financing and acquisition options after the breach but could not secure a viable path forward. 

Today we are announcing that Step Finance, SolanaFloor, and Remora Markets will be winding down all operations.

Following the hack at the end of January we explored every possible path forward, including financing and acquisition opportunities.

Unfortunately, we were unable to…

— Step☀️ (@StepFinance_) February 23, 2026 A Tragic End to Solana’s Early Ecosystem PlatformsThe shutdown also includes Remora Markets, another Step-linked platform. 

Step said it is working on a buyback for STEP holders using a pre-incident snapshot and a redemption process for Remora rToken holders, adding that Remora tokens remain backed 1:1.

Step Finances’ STEP Token Flatlined After the Recent Hack. Source: CoinGeckoMeanwhile, SolanaFloor said it will stop publishing new content but keep its existing website, videos, and newsletters online as an archive. 

The media outlet said it tried to continue operating after the events affecting its parent company, Step Finance, but could not find a sustainable route.

Today we are announcing that SolanaFloor will be winding down operations, effective immediately.

Since its founding, SolanaFloor has worked to document and contextualize the growth of the Solana ecosystem.

What began as a small X account grew into one of the most widely read…

— SolanaFloor (@SolanaFloor) February 23, 2026 The closures follow a major hack disclosed in late January that drained Step Finance’s treasury and triggered a sharp loss of confidence. 

The attack reportedly compromised devices linked to executives, giving attackers access to treasury wallets and leading to a multimillion-dollar loss in SOL.

That breach was a fatal blow because Step Finance depended on treasury resources to support operations and ecosystem expansion. 

After the hack, STEP token value collapsed, and the company faced mounting pressure to stabilize finances while maintaining multiple products.

Earlier today several of our treasury wallets were compromised by a sophisticated actor during APAC hours. This was an attack facilitated through a well known attack vector.

Immediate remediation steps have been taken, and we are working closely with top security professionals.…

— Step☀️ (@StepFinance_) January 31, 2026 Step Finance was one of Solana’s original DeFi infrastructure names. It built a widely used portfolio dashboard that helped users track wallets, yield positions, LPs, and broader on-chain activity across Solana in one place. 

For many users during Solana’s growth years, Step served as a core utility layer.

SolanaFloor played a different but equally important role. It became one of the most visible Solana-focused media and analytics platforms, covering ecosystem launches, market trends, NFTs, DeFi, and project updates. 

Together, the shutdowns mark the loss of two long-standing Solana brands.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Breaking Signal·Market Impact: Medium

Pippin surged 16.99% to $0.7276, leading daily gainers and extending a mid-cap rebound, according to CoinGecko data. Bitcoin Cash paced the losers with a 10.11% slide to $487.13 as some larger caps lagged. Broader moves were mixed, with Arbitrum, Pi Network, POL, and Morpho edging higher while Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, Cosmos Hub, and WLFI declined.

Top Gainers pippin (PIPPIN) jumped 16.99% to $0.7276. The move lifted its market cap to $728.38M, putting it squarely in mid-cap territory. It was the day’s strongest advance among tracked names. Liquidity-sensitive names often see outsized swings when buyers crowd into narrower order books.

Arbitrum (ARB) added 4.09% to $0.0933. Arbitrum is an Ethereum Layer 2 rollup network whose ARB token governs the ecosystem’s treasury and grants. No specific news has been tied to the move. Its market cap sits at $543.23M.

Pi Network (PI) advanced 3.31% to $0.1628. The project centers on a mobile-first approach to onboarding users via an app-centric community. With a $1.50B market cap, PI was the largest of the day’s gainers by capitalization. The token’s daily climb contrasted with weakness in several higher-cap decliners.

POL (ex-MATIC) (POL) climbed 2.98% to $0.1057. POL is the upgraded token for Polygon, replacing MATIC as part of the network’s rebrand and technical migration. Traders pointed to broader altcoin rotation. The token’s market cap stood at $1.12B after the move.

Morpho (MORPHO) gained 2.77% to $1.57. Morpho is a DeFi lending protocol focused on improving capital efficiency by matching lenders and borrowers on top of existing pools. The token’s market cap reached $561.40M. MORPHO’s single-digit rise kept it in line with other mid-cap advances on the session.

Top Losers Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fell 10.11% to $487.13. The Bitcoin fork emphasizes larger blocks and lower fees for peer-to-peer payments, but its price often exhibits high beta during risk-off stretches. Its market cap is $9.74B, the largest among today’s movers. The drop was the steepest in the group.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) slipped 5.99% to $26.00. HYPE is the token associated with the Hyperliquid derivatives venue. The coin’s market cap is $6.20B. Exchange-linked tokens can swing with changes in leverage conditions, trading volumes, and fee accrual expectations.

Pump.fun (PUMP) decreased 4.40% to $0.001810. PUMP is tied to the Pump.fun launch platform, which has become a prominent venue for rapid token creation. Its market cap registered at $1.07B. The pullback placed PUMP among the session’s sharper decliners.

Cosmos Hub (ATOM) dropped 3.76% to $2.10. ATOM secures the Cosmos Hub, a network focused on interchain interoperability via IBC. The coin’s market cap stood at $1.04B. The move lower arrived alongside weakness in several larger-cap names on the day.

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) eased 3.19% to $0.1096. WLFI is the token of World Liberty Financial. Its market cap came in at $3.03B. The decline was comparatively mild versus deeper drops elsewhere on the laggards board.

Market Outlook Dispersion defined the session: the top gainer rose 16.99% while the biggest loser shed 10.11%. Mid-caps like ARB, PI, POL, and MORPHO advanced between 2.77% and 4.09%, as HYPE, PUMP, ATOM, and WLFI declined between 3.19% and 5.99%.

Into month-end, traders will watch Bitcoin’s range, liquidity conditions, and upcoming macro prints for cues on risk appetite. Any shift in funding, volumes, or cross-chain flows could sway whether today’s rotation persists or reverses.

SourcesCoinGecko

This article was written with AI assistance and reviewed by the The Currency analytics editorial team. Information presented is sourced from publicly available reports. The Currency analytics strives for accuracy but cannot guarantee completeness. This article does not constitute financial advice.

Post Views: 2

TL;DR:

BTC price retraced to $64,111, liquidating approximately $240 million in long positions. Derivatives data shows liquidity asymmetry, with $3.5 billion vulnerable on the upside. Technical indicators like Bollinger Bands suggest an imminent expansion in volatility. The crypto market began the week with high tension as the pioneer cryptocurrency retraced to weekly lows. Despite this momentary weakness, the technical structure indicates that Bitcoin maintains consolidation phase within a three-week range situated between $65,000 and $71,000.

This correction effectively swept liquidity near $64,000, eliminating excess leverage in long positions. However, analysts observe that the price continues to rotate tightly, building pressure for an expansive move due to volatility compression.

Furthermore, funding rates on four-hour charts have turned red, indicating defensive positioning by traders. This scenario is ideal for a “short squeeze,” especially considering that there are over $3.5 billion in short positions that could be liquidated if the price retests $70,000.

Liquidity Magnets and Technical Recovery Projections Currently, there are two critical points of interest for derivatives traders: $63,000 on the downside and $70,000 on the upside. While a brief dip toward $63,000 could clear remaining liquidity, the volume concentrated at the top of the range acts as a more powerful magnet for the price.

Experts such as Christopher Inks point to the formation of a bullish divergence on the daily RSI, coupled with an increase in trading volume. These factors reinforce the thesis that once the sweep of the lows is complete, the asset will seek to reclaim higher levels to challenge historical resistance.

In summary, although Bitcoin maintains consolidation phase, indicators suggest that the sideways stage is nearing its end. The ability of buyers to defend the order block at $63,000 will be decisive in initiating the path toward new yearly highs.

Three Solana-based platforms have announced they are shutting down after a Step Finance hack at the end of January that has been deemed unrecoverable. 

Solana portfolio dashboard and DeFi aggregator Step Finance announced on Monday that it would be winding down operations. The closure also extends to subsidiaries Solana NFT analytics and ecosystem media outlet SolanaFloor, and lending and yield protocol Remora Markets.

“Following the hack at the end of January, we explored every possible path forward, including financing and acquisition opportunities,” it stated, referring to a $27 million security breach of its treasury wallets in January. 

The team said they were “unable to secure a viable outcome,” resulting in the decision to “end all operations effective immediately.” 

The DeFi platform said it is working on a buyback for holders of its native token STEP based on a snapshot prior to the incident. There will also be a redemption process for Remora rToken holders, they said. 

Source: Remora MarketsStep suffers $27 million security breach Step Finance reported a “breach of security for some of our treasury wallets” on Jan. 31 and asked cybersecurity firms to assist with the investigation. 

Blockchain security firm CertiK reported that 261,854 Solana (SOL), worth roughly $27 million at the time, was unstaked and transferred during the incident.

Crypto investor Mike Dudas said he was contacted by Step Finance regarding participation in a bridge round, but requested to see the security post-mortem first and got no response. 

Step Finance co-founder George Harrap said on Tuesday that “Some people have reached out on acquiring various businesses, and we will pursue those if serious and have interest, but we are on a time crunch.”

The platform’s native STEP token tanked 96% in the days following the hack. It slumped a further 36% following the announcement of the closure on Monday and is currently trading at $0.00057, according to CoinGecko. 

STEP hit an all-time high of $10.20 in August 2021.

STEP prices have crashed to virtually zero. Source: CoinGeckoSolana DeFi total value locked tanks 50% The triple closure is another blow to decentralized finance on Solana, which has seen total value on-chain tank 52% since its peak in September. Solana DeFi TVL currently stands at just $6.3 billion, according to DeFiLlama. 

Meanwhile, SOL prices have lost a further 1.8% on the day in a fall to $78, according to CoinGecko. The asset is now 74% down from its January 2025 all-time high of $293, hit during the peak of memecoin mania. 

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

XRP is struggling to hold the $1.40 level as persistent selling pressure continues to weigh on market sentiment. Price action remains fragile, reflecting broader uncertainty across the crypto sector. Bitcoin continues to trade within a range, offering limited directional clarity in the short term. This lack of decisive momentum is filtering through the market, leaving altcoins — including XRP — particularly vulnerable to underperformance in the absence of a strong macro trend.

Recent market activity has also drawn attention to exchange flows. Binance absorbed a massive inflow this week, cementing its status as the premier venue for high-volume transactions. On-chain data shows that more than 31 million XRP were transferred to the exchange in a single day yesterday, a movement that naturally raises questions about potential short-term supply dynamics.

Large inflows to exchanges can sometimes precede selling activity, although they do not guarantee immediate distribution. They may also reflect repositioning, hedging, or internal liquidity management. Still, in a market already facing cautious sentiment, such flows tend to reinforce short-term uncertainty around XRP’s price stability.

On-chain breakdowns show that the recent inflows were largely driven by larger holder cohorts, reinforcing the view that this was not retail-led activity. Addresses holding less than 1,000 XRP accounted for just 6,543 tokens, while the 1,000–10,000 bracket contributed 73,630 XRP. In contrast, the bulk of the movement originated from higher tiers: 10,000–100,000 holders transferred 2,938,809 XRP, the 100,000–1 million cohort moved 14,236,825 XRP, and wallets holding more than 1 million XRP sent 14,494,865 tokens to Binance.

XRP Ledger Exchange Inflow | Source: CryptoQuant This distribution highlights that the overwhelming share of the 31 million XRP inflow came from large participants. At current price levels, the aggregate transfer represents nearly $45 million in potential sell-side liquidity. While exchange inflows do not automatically translate into immediate liquidation, they do increase the amount of readily tradable supply on the order books.

In a market already facing muted momentum and broader uncertainty, such a concentration of large-holder deposits warrants close monitoring. If these flows evolve into sustained distribution, XRP could face renewed downward pressure. Under those conditions, the asset may struggle to stage a meaningful recovery from its ongoing corrective phase in the near term.

XRP Tests Structural Support As Downtrend Persists XRP continues to trade under sustained technical pressure, with the 3-day chart confirming a broader corrective structure that began after the 2025 peak above $3.50. Since that high, price action has formed a sequence of lower highs and lower lows, signaling weakening bullish momentum rather than consolidation. The most recent decline toward the $1.30–$1.40 region places XRP at a critical support zone that previously acted as a launchpad during earlier expansion phases.

XRP consolidates around a key level | Source: XRPUSDT chart on TradingView Technically, XRP is trading below the shorter- and medium-term moving averages, both of which are now sloping downward and acting as dynamic resistance. The longer-term average remains upward sloping but has flattened noticeably, reflecting fading macro momentum. Until price reclaims the $1.80–$2.00 range with strong volume, upside attempts are likely to face supply pressure near these moving averages.

Volume has moderated compared with the impulsive rally phase, suggesting reduced speculative participation. However, recent spikes during sharp selloffs indicate active distribution rather than passive drift.

If the $1.30 support region fails decisively, a deeper retracement toward the $1.10–$1.20 zone becomes plausible. Conversely, stabilization above current levels could open the door to a short-term relief bounce, though broader structure remains fragile.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com 

Ethereum price started a fresh decline below $1,880. ETH is now consolidating losses and might struggle to recover above $1,880 or $1,900.

Ethereum failed to stay above $1,920 and started a fresh decline. The price is trading below $1,900 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. There is a bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1,920 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken). The pair could start a fresh decline if it stays below the $1,900 zone. Ethereum Price Dips Further Ethereum price failed to stay above $1,900 and started a fresh decline, like Bitcoin. ETH price traded below the $1,880 and $1,860 levels to enter a bearish zone.

Finally, the bulls appeared near $1,810. A low was formed at $1,811, and the price started a minor recovery wave. There was a move above the $1,840 level, but the price is still below the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $1,995 swing high to the $1,811 low.

Ethereum price is now trading below $1,880 and the 100-hourly Simple Moving Average. If the bulls remain in action above $1,820, the price could attempt another increase. Immediate resistance is seen near the $1,870 level.

The first key resistance is near the $1,900 level and the 50% Fib retracement level of the downward move from the $1,995 swing high to the $1,811 low. The next major resistance is near the $1,920 level. There is also a bearish trend line forming with resistance at $1,920 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD.

Source: ETHUSD on TradingView.com A clear move above the $1,920 resistance might send the price toward the $1,965 resistance. An upside break above the $1,965 region might call for more gains in the coming days. In the stated case, Ether could rise toward the $2,000 resistance zone or even $2,020 in the near term.

Another Drop In ETH? If Ethereum fails to clear the $1,900 resistance, it could start a fresh decline. Initial support on the downside is near the $1,835 level. The first major support sits near the $1,820 zone.

A clear move below the $1,820 support might push the price toward the $1,780 support. Any more losses might send the price toward the $1,740 region. The main support could be $1,720.

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for ETH/USD is gaining momentum in the bearish zone.

Hourly RSI – The RSI for ETH/USD is now below the 50 zone.

Major Support Level – $1,820

Major Resistance Level – $1,900

Strategy founder Michael Saylor says bitcoin's recent drawdown reflects the normal growing pains of transformative technology, not a broken thesis, and he has the corporate war stories to prove it.

In brief The Terraform wind-down trust accuses Jane Street of trading on non-public information. The complaint centers on liquidity withdrawals during thes May 2022 depeg that led to TerraUSD and FTX’s collapse. The case could test insider liability in crypto markets, Decrypt was told. The Terraform Labs bankruptcy administrator has sued Jane Street, alleging the quantitative trading firm used non-public information to profit at the height of the crypto market’s collapse in 2022.

The lawsuit centers on allegations that Jane Street obtained advance insight into Terraform’s internal liquidity decisions and positioned trades around those moves as TerraUSD began to lose its dollar peg, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal on Monday.

“Jane Street abused market relationships to rig the market in its favor during one of the most consequential events in crypto history,” Terraform Labs court-appointed plan administrator Todd Snyder alleged in a statement to WSJ.

The move follows a lawsuit filed in a U.S. federal court in late December against Jump Trading, which accused the trading firm of unlawfully profiting from and materially contributing to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem.

The accused firm responded by characterizing the suit as a “desperate” attempt to “extract money” despite how “it is well-established that the losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were the result of a multibillion-dollar fraud perpetrated by the management of Terraform Labs,” per the report.

Decrypt has reached out to Jane Street and the Terraform Labs wind-down trust for comment, but has not yet received a response.

“This lawsuit seems to argue that the most important moves do happen in private chats before hitting the blockchain,” Andrew Rossow, public affairs attorney and CEO of AR Media Consulting, told Decrypt.

The case “matters significantly, because the court isn't just judging a trade anymore; it's setting a precedent that ‘privileged access’ in DeFi is a legal liability, and not just a competitive advantage,” Rossow said.

If the allegations are proven, the case could signal a shift toward applying a stricter misappropriation theory in crypto markets.

Under that approach, liability would not depend on a traditional corporate insider relationship. Instead, a market maker could face exposure if it obtained confidential information from a protocol team and used it to trade against the broader market, Rossow explained.

The theory would also broaden the definition of an “insider” in such cases. Private chat groups or informal back channels could be treated as the functional equivalent of a corporate boardroom, meaning insider status could extend to anyone with direct access to a protocol’s crisis communications.

“It suggests that in crypto, an ‘insider’ isn't just an executive; it's anyone with a private line to the ‘war room’ of a protocol during a crisis,” Rossow said.

The legal observer said the case will likely hinge on materiality and source.

Terraform collapsed in May 2022 after its algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD lost its dollar peg, sending its sister token Luna into a near-total wipeout within days. The roughly $40 billion implosion erased billions in investor value and intensified stress across the broader crypto market.

The fallout contributed to a wider industry downturn that led to a string of failures, including the eventual collapse of FTX later that year.

Terraform filed for bankruptcy in January 2024, and a wind-down trust was later established to pursue recoveries for creditors. Founder Do Kwon has since pleaded guilty to criminal charges and is serving a 15-year prison sentence.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

4 mins mins

May 22 victim claims deadline in the UK: unconfirmedReports circulating online claim the UK’s recovery registration for the qian zhimin money laundering case will close on May 22. This purported victim claims deadline in the UK remains unconfirmed.

Authoritative confirmation would ordinarily appear in a UK court order or a prosecutor’s public notice. No such document has been identified in publicly available materials referenced by reputable sources.

Until an official notice is published, any specific date should be treated as provisional and subject to change. Victims should rely on official channels for any binding timelines.

How UK civil recovery under POCA Section 281 worksUnder Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, civil recovery targets property suspected to be the proceeds of unlawful conduct. Section 281 allows third parties to assert claims to recover their property.

According to Thornhill Legal, civil recovery proceedings were filed in September 2024 under Part 5, and victims are given a “reasonable period” to file Section 281 claims. These applications are heard within the civil recovery case rather than the criminal prosecution.

Claimants typically provide identity details, evidence of loss, transaction records, and tracing that links their funds to seized assets. Courts assess credibility, provenance, and competing interests before any distribution.

Investigators have described the scale and complexity of this case as exceptional, reflecting the challenges of cross‑border tracing. “One of the largest and most complex economic crime investigations ever undertaken,” said Will Lyne, Head of Economic & Cybercrime Command.

Criminal proceedings determine guilt, whereas civil recovery focuses on property. The two processes are distinct but may proceed in parallel under UK law.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

Organize identity documents and proof of investment, including contracts, payment records, on‑chain transaction IDs, and correspondence. Prepare a clear chronology linking funds paid to wallets associated with the case.

Preserve original files and certified translations where documents are not in English. Ensure any blockchain analysis, if used, references verifiable transaction hashes and exchange records.

Keep records of intermediaries and custodians who handled transfers. Beware of unofficial portals requesting fees or private keys, as claim intake should align with court‑directed procedures.

What assets have been seized, including the reported 61,000 bitcoins?As reported by Yahoo Finance, authorities have frozen more than 61,000 bitcoins linked to the scheme, and experts warn that proving ownership may be difficult for many victims. As reported by The Independent, the fraud affected over 128,000 people in China between 2014 and 2017.

Where to find notices from CPS, Metropolitan Police, or High CourtFormal directions about claim windows and filing mechanics would be set out in court orders. Procedural notices may be published by the prosecuting authority.

Operational updates, asset‑seizure summaries, or clarifications on evidence may appear in police statements. Priority should be given to documents and notices issued directly by these bodies.

FAQ about Qian Zhimin money laundering caseHow do victims submit a POCA Section 281 claim in the UK and what documents are required?Submit within the civil recovery case directions, following court guidance. Include identity, loss evidence, transaction records, wallet addresses, provenance tracing, and certified translations for non‑English materials.

Can non-UK residents (e.g., victims in China) file claims, and do they need a UK lawyer?Non‑UK victims may file if the court recognizes their interest under POCA. A UK lawyer is not mandatory but can assist with filings, evidence standards, and cross‑border documentation.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The crypto market has started the week under pressure as macroeconomic uncertainty and trade tensions unsettled investors, briefly pushing Bitcoin below $65,000 and driving a surge in online panic signals. The latest decline has closely followed global economic headlines rather than crypto-specific factors.

On Feb. 23, Bitcoin dropped to nearly $64,400 within hours, dragging major altcoins lower and wiping billions from total market value. The move coincided with escalating tariff concerns after U.S. President Donald Trump announced an increase in global import tariffs to 15%, amplifying fears of slower economic growth.

BTC's price trends to the downside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview Fear Spikes as Retail Sentiment on Bitcoin (BTC) Deteriorates Retail sentiment has weakened sharply as prices struggle around $65,000, with fear increasingly visible across market indicators. Online search behavior reflects growing anxiety, as data from Google Trends shows a record surge in searches for “Bitcoin to zero.”

Technical indicators show Bitcoin (BTC) struggling to maintain key support levels amid heightened selling pressure. Spot trading volumes dropped by nearly 59%, limiting liquidity and amplifying price swings. Derivatives markets also reflect caution: open interest fell to $19.5 billion, roughly half of January’s peak.

Price charts indicate further downside if support near $64,000 fails, with $60,000 as the key lower target. The 20-day moving average around $68,278 and the lower Bollinger Band near $64,098 show range-bound pressure, while mild outflows and clustered leveraged longs between $64,090–$64,536 could trigger liquidations.

Macro Shocks Weigh on Crypto Markets Analysts linked the sell-off to a combination of weakening economic indicators and risk-off sentiment. U.S. housing data showed declining pending home sales, while currency markets reacted to expectations of tighter policy from the Bank of Japan, strengthening the yen and prompting global funds to reduce leverage.

Similarly, whale activity added pressure. On-chain data showed large holders moving coins onto exchanges, a signal often associated with selling. Spot trading volumes also dropped significantly, suggesting limited liquidity to absorb sudden moves.

The broader market followed Bitcoin lower. Ethereum fell roughly 5%, while other major tokens posted losses between 3% and 8%. Additional attention came after Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin sold millions of dollars worth of ETH, reinforcing concerns about near-term supply pressure.

Market participants now view the $60,000 level as a key support zone. Analysts warn that a sustained break below it could trigger large liquidations, while recovery above the mid-$60,000 range may stabilize sentiment.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

PERTH, Australia, Feb. 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alkane Resources Limited (ASX: ALK; TSX: ALK; OTCQX: ALKRY) (‘Alkane’ or ‘the Company’) is pleased to announce the latest exploration results and drilling for the underground expansion of existing resources at its Tomingley Gold Operations (Tomingley) in New South Wales.

Program Summary

Exploration drilling at Tomingley has tested a seismic reflector feature beneath the Roswell Deposit and near-mine prospects such as El Paso. Underground drilling at Roswell, outside of grade control, has focused on improving confidence in the Inferred Resources.Roswell underground resources (1.3g/t Au cut-off) are estimated at 5.5Mt grading 2.6g/t Au for an endowment of 476,000 oz Au1. A previous exploration drill hole (RWD061) was extended to 1,392m depth to intersect a seismic reflector identified ~400m below current resources. The drilling identified the east dipping reflector as gold-arsenic enriched hydrothermal breccias and veining.A program of underground drilling at Roswell targeting the Inferred Resources hosted by the Western Monzodiorite domain was completed. Results for this program testing the mid-portion of the domain to a nominal 15m x 20m grid spacing were received from the final 21 drill holes, totalling 4,019m. The program has confirmed multiple high-grade gold zones within the monzodiorite.Exploration drilling of 7 diamond core drill holes at the El Paso prospect and 1 RC drill hole at the Westray prospect. All drilling intersected quartz veining with gold-arsenic mineralisation, hosted in the prospective Mingelo Volcanic stratigraphy. Assay Highlights

Roswell Seismic target (RWD061): 8.7 m grading 1.15g/t Au including 3 m grading 2.78g/t Au;0.3 m grading 11.4g/t Au;2 m grading 5.90g/t Au. Roswell Western Monzodiorite underground drilling: 5.9 m grading 31.0g/t Au including 2.1 m grading 78.4g/t Au (ROSUG657D);17.4 m grading 4.30g/t Au including 2.5 m grading 21.1g/t Au (ROSUG644D);3.5 m grading 16.1g/t Au including 1.2 m grading 45.1g/t Au (ROSUG425D);0.6 m grading 69.2g/t Au (ROSUG656D). El Paso exploration drilling: 17 m grading 4.02g/t Au including 0.5 m grading 77.5g/t Au (EPD020);8 m grading 2.10g/t Au (EPD020). Alkane Managing Director & CEO Nic Earner said: “Our continuing exploration at Tomingley reveals both extensions to our deposits, which remain open at depth and along strike, as well as new areas of mineralisation. This drilling demonstrates the significant resource expansion potential across the mine site, we look forward to revealing this potential, both near mine and regionally around Tomingley.”

1 Refer to ALK Announcement dated 15 October 2025 titled ‘NSW Resources and Reserves Statements FY25’.
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

Tomingley Gold Operations (TGO)

Alkane Resources Ltd 100%

Tomingley Gold Mine is an open pit and underground mining development with a 1Mtpa processing facility in operation since 2014. The development is located near the village of Tomingley, approximately 50 kilometres southwest of Dubbo in Central West New South Wales. Tomingley Gold Operations Pty Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of Alkane.

Development at Tomingley has been based on the Wyoming One, Wyoming Three, Caloma, Caloma Two and Roswell gold deposits. To date, mining occurred underground at Wyoming One, Caloma, Caloma Two and Roswell deposits. Roswell stope ore production came on stream in April 2024 (ASX Announcement 22 April 2024) via an approximately 3 km decline from the Wyoming One open cut.

The Tomingley deposits are located within a tightly folded Ordovician volcano-sedimentary sequence that has been altered to a sericite-carbonate-albite-quartz-pyrite-arsenopyrite assemblage, typical of orogenic lode-style gold deposits. Mineralised fluids are interpreted to have been focused by differential strain in and around andesitic volcanics due to the rheological competency contrast between the volcanics and the bounding volcaniclastic sediments. The brittle nature of the volcanics often leads to the development of shear-hosted sheeted quartz vein and breccia deposits within and adjacent to the andesitic bodies. Separately, thin carbonaceous mudstone strata appear to have been a focus for shearing and a chemical trap for gold.

Since underground mining commenced in 2018, extensive underground drilling has been employed to define ore reserves for extraction and maintain exploration to define additional resources. The most recent Reserves and Resources were summarised in the ASX release on 15 October 2025 “NSW Resources and Reserves Statements FY25”.

Roswell

The Roswell underground resources (1.3g/t Au cut-off) are estimated at 5.5Mt grading 2.6g/t Au for 476 oz Au (see table titled TGO Mineral Resources at 30 June 2025). The previously deepest exploration drill hole (RWD061 – ASX announcement 17 November 2022) at Roswell was completed to 1,002m. This hole was recently extended by another 390m with HQ3 diamond core drilling to intersect a seismic reflector identified by the reprocessed 2D seismic survey data in 2024 (see ASX announcement 7 October 2024). This reflector, identified in three 2D seismic traverses, is dipping ~30o to the east with more than a 5km strike length, is interpreted to be a major fault or conduit for the upwelling of gold-arsenic enriched hydrothermal fluids to the Tomingley gold system.

The drill hole intersected several hydrothermal breccias, and quartz veining in a similar orientation to the seismic reflector surrounded by an intense silicification alteration halo hosted in volcaniclastic metasediments. Visible gold was observed in one of the breccias. The reflector zone was also characterised by zones of intense arsenopyrite mineralisation associated with low gold grades, such as 7 metres grading 0.16g/t Au and >0.5% As from 1,176 metres. Footwall to the seismic reflector, the hole intersected the down dip and normal offset extensions to the Western Monzodiorite (MZD) that was also mineralised. In summary, significant gold intercepts from the extension of RWD061 include:

RWD061 8.7 metres grading 1.15g/t Au from 1104.3 metres; incl3 metres grading 2.78g/t Au from 1110 metres; and0.3 metres grading 11.4g/t Au from 1208.9 metres (visible Au); and2 metres grading 5.90g/t Au from 1232 metres (MZD); and1 metre grading 2.44g/t Au from 1291 metres (MZD).    The reflector where intersected by RWD061 is hosted by metasediments. As observed at the Tomingley deposits, higher gold grades and broader intercepts will likely occur where mineralised structures intersect a favourable rheological and chemical host lithologies such as the andesite or monzodiorite at Roswell. Further drilling is planned in the areas above and below RWD061 to test where the conduit structure intersects the Andesite and the MZD. The flexure in the reflector albeit in the metasediments of the Cotton Formation is also a favourable structural setting and is also planned to be tested.

RWD061 – Subvertical meta-sediments with cross-cutting shallow east dipping sheeted quartz-arsenopyrite veins and breccias (7m interval grading 0.16g/t Au and >0.5% As from 1,176 m).

A significant portion of the Roswell underground Inferred Resources (408 kt grading 1.9 g/t Au - ASX Announcement 15 October 2025) is hosted in the Western Monzodiorite domain. A program of intensive underground diamond core drilling targeting the mid-portion of the Western Monzodiorite domain within the Inferred Resources was recently completed. The drilling will improve the confidence of the Mineral Resource Estimation (MRE) and provide a basis for conversion to Ore Reserves.

Results have been received from 21 holes totalling 4,019 metres that are targeting the mid-portion of the monzodiorite domain infilling existing drilling to a nominal 15m x 20m grid spacing for the purpose of converting to an Indicated Resource. The drilling confirmed multiple wide, high-grade gold intercepts within the 30 m thick monzodiorite, particularly along its western margin. Best intercepts include:

ROSUG425D3.5 metres grading 16.1 g/t Au from 155.8 metres;incl1.2 metres grading 45.1 g/t Au from 158.1 metres.  ROSUG576D0.6 metres grading 20.7 g/t Au from 128.3 metres;and12.8 metres grading 1.96 g/t Au from 157 metres;incl1 metres grading 14.0 g/t Au from 157 metres.  ROSUG647D10.1 metres grading 3.81 g/t Au from 110.6 metres.  ROSUG656D3.6 metres grading 7.31 g/t Au from 187 metres;incl1 metres grading 24.6 g/t Au from 189.6 metres;and1.3 metres grading 38.7 g/t Au from 195.6 metres.  ROSUG657D0.5 metres grading 13.5 g/t Au from 151.3 metres;and3.7 metres grading 3.62 g/t Au from 168.7 metres;and5.9 metres grading 31.0 g/t Au from 177.9 metres;incl2.1 metres grading 78.4 g/t Au from 177.9 metres.  

El Paso and Regional Exploration

Recent regional exploration to generate new targets for discovery of gold resources outside of the Tomingley Gold Operations has included 3,341 metres of air-core drilling testing areas of covered bedrock, a high-resolution drone magnetic survey, and rock chip sampling of outcropping areas. Assay results were received from target testing exploration comprising of seven mud rotary pre-collared diamond core drill holes at the El Paso prospect and one RC drill hole at the Westray prospect.

At El Paso, a total of 1,964 metres were completed to test the extent of dacite-associated gold mineralisation such as 32.1m at 1.65g/t Au from 66.9m and 6.1m at 3.03g/t from 120.9m (EPD017 – ASX announcement 14 August 2025), according to the interpretation of a moderately SE-dipping sill. When most of the holes failed to intersect the dacite, the interpretation was reviewed with the data from the new drilling and relogging of earlier holes. The new interpretation has three distinct dacite lavas that strike NNE and dip subvertical to the WNW. One drill hole (EPD024) was also planned to test for an offset to the dacite northwest of a significant northwest striking fault. The drilling did not intersect dacite. Whilst the current drilling orientation was not optimal to test this new interpretation and any future drilling will be now collared from the west, significant gold mineralisation was still intercepted including:

EPD020
  17 metres grading 4.02 g/t Au from 82 metres; incl3.8 metres grading 14.1 g/t Au from 89 metres;
 incl0.5 metres grading 77.5 g/t Au from 92.3 metres;
 and8 metres grading 2.10 g/t Au from 133 metres.
   EPD021
  9.6 metres grading 0.80 g/t Au from 60 metres; incl1 metres grading 4.41 g/t Au from 64 metres.
    EPD022
  2 metres grading 1.18 g/t Au from 97 metres; and
6 metres grading 0.99 g/t Au from 107 metres.
    

Previous air-core and soil sampling identified the Westray prospect as a multipoint Au-As target hosted in the prospective Mingelo Volcanics (ASX announcement 14 August 2025). The prospect had not been previously tested by RC or diamond drilling. One RC drill hole was recently completed to 194m to test the shallow gold mineralisation at depth in fresh rock, intersecting significant results of:

WSRC0011 m grading 2.49 g/t Au from 115 metres;and6 m grading 0.59 g/t Au from 143 metres.   The drill hole intersected a thick package of volcaniclastic metasediments with one thin andesitic volcanic with diffuse peperitic contacts. Approximately 100m of bleaching sericite alteration with varying levels of quartz veining associated with elevated gold and arsenic was intersected from 95m downhole. Further exploration is to focus on identifying a significantly sized (+30m thick) volcanic host that intersects this mineralised structure.

Further Work

Surface exploration drilling at Tomingley mine site has commenced with diamond core drilling to test the underground potential at the Wyoming Three deposit, and the northern extensions of the main andesite host at Caloma.

The recent significant gold results from the underground drilling of the Western Monzodiorite domain has initiated a second phase of drilling that will test the upper and lower portions of the Inferred domain. This program is underway and expected to be completed by Q3 2026.

Near-mine exploration has recommenced with two diamond core drill holes planned to further characterise the mineralisation identified at the Tomingley One and Tomingley Two prospects. A 1,600m deep diamond core drill hole, to test beneath the Peak Hill epithermal gold deposits for the existence of a Cu-Au porphyry beneath the epithermal gold lithocap.

Planned to commence in Q2 2026 are four diamond core drill holes at Glen Isla to test epithermal gold targets generated from an Induced Polarisation (IP) survey completed in 2025. Additional mud rotary diamond core drilling at El Paso is also planned to confirm the updated geological model and to test for extensions to the known mineralisation to inform the exploration target.

TGO Mineral Resources 

 TOMINGLEY GOLD OPERATION MINERAL RESOURCES (as at 30 June 2025)
 MEASUREDINDICATEDINFERREDTOTALTotal Gold
DEPOSITTonnageGradeTonnageGradeTonnageGradeTonnageGrade  (kt)(g/t Au)(kt)(g/t Au)(kt)(g/t Au)(kt)(g/t Au)(koz)Open Pittable Resources (cut off 0.40g/t Au)San Antonio00.05,9301.81,3891.37,3191.7406Sub Total00.05,9301.81,3891.37,3191.7406Underground Resources (cut off 1.3g/t Au)Wyoming One10332.76362.21042.11,7722.5140Wyoming Three462.2242.0201.9902.16Caloma One5982.27952.1171.51,4102.298Caloma Two3682.314992.33622.02,2292.3162Roswell2,6492.924872.64081.955442.6476McLeans    8702.58702.570Sub Total4,6942.75,4412.41,7812.211,9152.5952TOTAL4,6942.711,3712.13,1701.819,2342.21,358 Apparent arithmetic inconsistencies are due to rounding
These Mineral Resources are wholly inclusive of Ore Reserves.

TGO Ore Reserves

 TOMINGLEY GOLD OPERATION ORE RESERVES(as at 30 June 2025) PROVEDPROBABLETOTALTotal GoldDEPOSITTonnageGradeTonnageGradeTonnageGrade  (Kt)(g/t Au)(Kt)(g/t Au)(Kt)(g/t Au)(Koz)Open Pittable Reserves (cut off 0.40g/t Au)    San Antonio00.04,1001.64,1001.6214Stockpiles3141.1003141.111Sub Total3141.14,1001.64,4141.6225Underground Reserves (cut off 1.3g/t Au and 1.6g/t Au for Roswell)  Wyoming One26.41.811.2271.82Caloma One134.71.7337.41.54721.624Caloma Two38.41.5936.21.79751.753Roswell2,3652.32,1092.14,4742.2316Sub Total2,5642.33,3831.95,9482.1396TOTAL2,8782.17,4831.710,3621.9621 Apparent arithmetic inconsistencies are due to rounding

The above tables were published in ASX Announcement dated 15 October 2025 and titled ‘NSW Resources and Reserves Statement FY25’.

Table 1 - TOMINGLEY GOLD OPERATIONS SIGNIFICANT RESULTS ROSWELL - February 2026 (>1.3g/t)Hole IDEasting (MGA)Northing (MGA)RL (m)DipAzimuth (Grid)Total DepthInterval From (m)Interval To (m)Intercept (m)Au(g/t)Ore ZoneROSUG416D6139666390772-144-29292186122.7134.411.72.47 incl      123.4126.12.76.28 and      145.4146.30.91.35 ROSUG425D6139666390771-144-32277188.5119.4120.81.45.31 and      127129.32.31.89 and      134.4136.62.23.35 and      141142.31.31.65 and      155.8159.33.516.1 incl      158.1159.31.245.1 ROSUG566D6139666390772-144-33291194.3130.7137.97.21.54 incl      13213423.16 and      147.9148.915.90 and      170.1171.31.22.40 ROSUG570D6139666390772-144-30282192123124.11.12.78 and      128.9129.70.82.24 and      162.81652.22.20 ROSUG571D6139666390772-144-35282204129.1131.92.82.97 and      140.2142.92.71.68 and      168169.21.23.69 ROSUG575D6139666390771-144-28278179.8155.4156.91.52.10 ROSUG576D6139666390771-144-35278194.7128.3128.90.620.7Westernand      135.1140.75.61.31Monzodioriteincl      135.1136.51.43.55 and      157169.812.81.96 incl      157158114.0 ROSUG580D6139666390771-144-31270191.8122.11230.91.18 and      137.21380.82.02 and      153.5155.92.42.36 ROSUG643D6139666390770-1432244187.6169.21711.84.59 ROSUG644D6139666390770-14214257174118.2135.617.44.30 incl      129.51322.521.1 and      153.1154.31.23.87 ROSUG645D6139666390770-143-1243190.3175.5178.12.65.51 ROSUG646D6139666390770-144-12247183148.9150.71.81.52 and      168176.78.71.30 incl      16816913.78 ROSUG647D6139666390770-14212271150110.2120.310.13.81 incl      112.9116.83.96.30 and      138.6139.20.63.02 ROSUG648D6139666390770-1429277144111.1122.611.52.16 incl      111.11120.97.75 also      113.9115.21.35.76 and      127.1128.71.61.49 and      129.71311.31.54 ROSUG651D6139666390769-143-3253164.814714812.37 ROSUG652D6139656390769-143-4248177No significant intercept (<1.3g/t Au) ROSUG653D6139666390770-144-22241189174178.24.21.45 incl      176.9178.21.33.00 ROSUG656D6139666390770-144-18242203.616116651.48 and      187190.63.67.31 incl      189.6190.6124.6 and      195.6196.91.338.7 incl      195.6196.20.669.2 ROSUG657D6139666390769-144-23254195126.2127.31.11.87 and      151.3151.80.513.5 and      168.7172.43.73.62 and      177.9183.85.931.0 incl      177.91802.178.4 ROSUG658D6139656390769-144-27246224.7148.9149.915.53 and      162.81674.21.78Westernand      175.318610.72.44Monzodioriteincl      184185116.9 and      19519611.48 ROSUG670D614123639076965-10256304.924624822.13 and      256.1261.75.61.32 incl      260.9261.70.83.50 RWD061*6144466390759269-642661392.71104.311138.71.15 incl      1110111332.78 and      1208.91209.20.311.4 and      1232123425.90 and      1291129212.44  True widths are approximately 80% of intercept width. Reported intercepts (>1.3g/t Au) are calculated using a broad lower cut of 1.0g/t Au although grades lower than this may be present internally (internal dilution).

Table 2 - TOMINGLEY GOLD PROJECT SIGNIFICANT GOLD RESULTS – February 2026 (>0.2g/t Au)Hole IDEasting (MGA)Northing (MGA)RL (m)DipAzimuth (Grid)Total DepthInterval From (m)Interval To (m)Intercept (m)Au (g/t)ProspectEPD0186132836387782266-61317309.5190.31921.70.43 and      23523720.38 and      24324630.34 EPD0196133736387704266-63302479No significant results or dacite EPD0206133526387965265-61320204.76666.90.90.24 and      8299174.02 incl      8992.83.814.1 incl      92.392.80.577.5 and      13314182.1El PasoEPD0216132516387864266-61338282.76069.69.60.8 incl      646514.41 and      878920.83 and      11511610.61 and      240.2242.92.70.56 EPD0226132106388044265-60318135.1979921.18 and      10711360.99 incl      108.21101.82.08 EPD0236133096388105265-61323198.77373.70.71.26 EPD0246133476388548265-6127435419720030.28 WSRC0016121586382395265273-6019411511612.49Westrayand      14314960.59  True widths are approximately 50% of intercept width at El Paso and unknown at Westray.

Competent Person

Unless otherwise advised above or in the Announcements referenced, the information in this announcement that relates to exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves is based on information compiled by Mr David Meates, MAIG, (Exploration Manager NSW) who has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Meates consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information and Statements

This announcement contains certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation and may include future-oriented financial information or financial outlook information (collectively Forward-Looking Information). Actual results and outcomes may vary materially from the amounts set out in any Forward-Looking Information. As well, Forward-Looking Information may relate to: future outlook and anticipated events; expectations regarding exploration potential; production capabilities and future financial or operating performance, including AISC, investment returns, margins and share price performance; production and cost guidance and the timing thereof; issuing updated resources and reserves estimate and the timing thereof; the potential of Alkane to meet industry targets, public profile and expectations; and future plans, projections, objectives, estimates and forecasts and the timing related thereto.

Forward-Looking Information is generally identified by the use of words like "will", "create", "enhance", "improve", "potential", "expect", "upside", "growth" and similar expressions and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", or "should", or the negative connotation of such terms, are intended to identify Forward-Looking Information.

Although Alkane believes that the expectations reflected in the Forward-Looking Information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on Forward-Looking Information since no assurance can be provided that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-Looking Information is based on information available at the time those statements are made and/or good faith belief of the officers and directors of Alkane as of that time with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the Forward-Looking Information. Forward-Looking Information involves numerous risks and uncertainties. Such factors include, without limitation: risks relating to changes in the gold and antimony price.

Forward-Looking Information is designed to help readers understand Alkane’s views as of that time with respect to future events and speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by applicable law, Alkane assumes no obligation to update or to publicly announce the results of any change to any forward-looking statement contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect actual results, future events or developments, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting the Forward-looking Information. If Alkane updates any one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that the company will make additional updates with respect to those or other Forward-looking Information. All Forward-Looking Information contained in this announcement is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement.

Disclaimer

Alkane has prepared this announcement based on information available to it. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions or conclusions contained in this announcement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of Alkane, its directors, officers, employees, associates, advisers and agents, nor any other person accepts any liability, including, without limitation, any liability arising from fault or negligence on the part of any of them or any other person, for any loss arising from the use of this announcement or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with it.

This announcement is not an offer, invitation, solicitation, or other recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of any security, and neither this announcement nor anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever.

This document has been authorised for release to the market by Nic Earner, Managing Director and CEO.

ABOUT ALKANE ‐ www.alkres.com ‐ ASX:ALK | TSX: ALK | OTCQX: ALKRY

Alkane (ASX:ALK; TSX:ALK; OTCQX:ALKRY) is an Australia-based gold and antimony producer with a portfolio of three operating mines across Australia and Sweden. The Company has a strong balance sheet and is positioned for further growth.

Alkane’s wholly owned producing assets are the Tomingley open pit and underground gold mine southwest of Dubbo in Central West New South Wales, the Costerfield gold and antimony underground mining operation northeast of Heathcote in Central Victoria, and the Björkdal underground gold mine northwest of Skellefteå in Sweden (approximately 750 km north of Stockholm). Ongoing near-mine regional exploration continues to grow resources at all three operations.

Alkane also owns the very large gold-copper porphyry Boda-Kaiser Project in Central West New South Wales and has outlined an economic development pathway in a Scoping Study. The Company has ongoing exploration within the surrounding Northern Molong Porphyry Project and is confident of further enhancing eastern Australia’s reputation as a significant gold, copper and antimony production region.

CONTACT: NIC EARNER, MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO, ALKANE RESOURCES LTD, TEL +61 8 9227 5677

INVESTORS & MEDIA: NATALIE CHAPMAN, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER, TEL +61 418 642 556

APPENDIX 1

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report – Tomingley Gold Project February 2026
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)

CriteriaJORC Code explanationCommentarySampling techniques• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.Drilling at Roswell Western MZD Inferred Resources as part of mine development underground drilling was NQ2. Exploration diamond core drilling was HQ3.DD sample intervals were defined by site geologists during logging to honour geological boundaries with whole core sampled on intervals defined by the geologist.

RC and AC samples are collected at one metre intervals via a cyclone on the rig. The cyclone is cleaned regularly to minimise any contamination

• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.Sampling and QAQC procedures are carried out using Alkane protocols as per industry best practice.• Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.Core was laid out in suitably labelled core trays. A core marker (core block) was placed at the end of each drilled run (nominally 3m) and labelled with the hole number, down hole depth, length of drill run. Core was aligned and measured by tape, comparing back to this down hole depth consistent with industry standards. Half core is sampled with a Corewise automatic core saw.
RC and AC Drilling – the total sample (~20-30kg) is delivered via cyclone into a large plastic bag which is retained for future use if required. A sub-sample of approximately 1kg is spear sampled from each plastic bag and composited to make a 3 metres sample interval. If strong mineralisation is observed by the site geologist this is sampled as a final 1m interval instead.
Gold was determined by fire assay fusion of a 50g charge with an AAS analytical finish.A multi-element suite was determined using either aqua regia or a multi-acid digest with a ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry or ICP Mass Spectrometry analytical finish..

Drilling techniques• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).Reverse circulation (RC) drilling using 110mm rods 144mm face sampling hammer.Triple tube diamond drilling with PQ3/HQ3 wireline bit producing 83mm diameter (PQ3) and 61.1mm diameter (HQ3) sized orientated core (using a Reflex orientation tool). In areas of deep cover, the collars were emplaced using mud rotary through the cover sequence and not sampled. Underground drilling at Roswell were drilled using NQ2.

Air-core (AC) drilling using 89mm rods and bit to refusal.

Drill sample recovery• Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.DD - core loss was identified by drillers and calculated by geologists when logging. Core was only lost in the saprolite for approximately ≥95% recovery in the oxide material.RC and AC sample quality is assessed by the sampler by visual approximation of sample recovery and if the sample is dry, damp or wet.

• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.Sample quality is qualitatively logged.A high capacity RC rig was used to enable dry samples collected. Drill cyclone is cleaned between rod changes and after each hole to minimise cross-hole contamination.

A high capacity AC rig was used to maximise penetration through the clays to refusal on fresh bedrock. Drill cyclone was cleaned after each hole to minimise cross-hole contamination.

Triple tube coring is used at all times to maximise core recovery for diamond drilling. All NQ2 core was whole sampled to ensure representativity of sampling.

• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.There is no known relationship between sample recovery and grade.Logging• Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.DD - all core was laid out in core trays and geologically logged for characteristics such as lithology, weathering, alteration (type, character and intensity), veining (type, character and intensity) and mineralisation (type, character and volume percentage). A brief geotechnical log was also undertaken collecting parameters such as core recovery, RQD, fracture count, and fracture type and orientation.RC/AC - Each one metre interval is geologically logged for characteristics such as lithology, weathering, alteration (type, character and intensity), veining (type, character and intensity) and mineralisation (type, character and volume percentage).

• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography.Mostly logging was qualitative with visual estimates of the various characteristics. In addition, magnetic susceptibility data (quantitative) was collected as an aid for logging.
All drill holes were geologically logged into Geobank Mobile, followed by validation before importing into Alkane’s central Geobank database.All drill holes were logged by qualified and experienced geologists.

• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.All drill holes were logged in full, except for the mud rotary technique through the cover sequence.Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.HQ core sawn with half core samples submitted for analysis. NQ2 core whole sampled and submitted for analysis.• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.Each one metre interval is spear sampled with 3m composite samples collected in a calico sample bag and forwarded to the laboratory. Where strong mineralisation is observed by the site geologist, instead of compositing, this is individually sampled from the cone splitter on the RC rig as a 1 metre interval into a calico bag and forwarded to the laboratory.Laboratory Preparation – the entire sample (~3kg) is dried and pulverised in an LM5 (or equivalent) to ≥85% passing 75µm. Bulk rejects for all samples are discarded. A pulp sample (±100g) is stored for future reference.

• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.Samples were delivered to ALS Minerals Laboratory, Orange NSW. Crushed with 70% <2mm (ALS code CRU-31), split by riffle splitter (ALS code SPL-21), and pulverised 1000grm to 85% <75um (ALS code PUL-32). Crushers and pulverisers are washed with QAQC tests undertaken (ALS codes CRU-QC, PUL-QC).• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.Internal QAQC system in place to determine accuracy and precision of assays.• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.Entire core sampling was undertaken for NQ2. Non-biased core cutting for HQ using an orientation line marked on the core.Duplicate RC and AC samples are collected for both composite intervals and re-split intervals.

• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.Sample sizes are considered appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.Quality of assay data and laboratory tests• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.All samples were analysed by ALS Minerals.Gold is determined using a 50g charge fused at approximately 1100°C with alkaline fluxes, including lead oxide. The resultant prill is dissolved in aqua regia with gold determined by flame AAS.

Other geochemical elements, DD core and bottom of hole AC samples are digested by near-total mixed acid digest with each element determined by ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry or ICP Mass Spectrometry. RC and AC samples are digested by aqua regia with a ICP Atomic Emission Spectrometry for As, Cu, Fe, Ni, P, Pb only.

• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.Not applicable to this report or deposit as no geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments were used.• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established.Commercially prepared Certified Reference Materials (CRM) are inserted at 1 in 40 samples. CRM’s are not identifiable to the laboratory.Field duplicate samples are inserted at 1 in 40 samples (alternate to CRM’s).

Laboratory QAQC sampling includes insertion of CRM samples, internal duplicates and screen tests. This data is reported for each sample submission.

Failed standards result in re-assaying of portions of the affected sample batches.

Assaying and laboratory procedure techniques are consideredtotal].

Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. Drill data was compiled and collated and reviewed by senior staff. External consultants do not routinely verify data until resource estimation procedures are deemed necessary The use of twinned holes. Twinned holes have not been used for this drilling. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. All drilling data at Tomingley is stored in a “Datashed” Microsoft SQL database.All primary assay data was received from the laboratory as electronic data files which were imported into sampling database with verification procedures in place. QAQC analysis was undertaken for each laboratory report.

Digital copies of Certificates of Analysis (COA) are stored in a central database with regular (daily) backup. Original survey data is stored on site.

Data was also verified on import into mining related software.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data. No assay data was adjusted.Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Underground drill holes were laid out by underground survey. Surface drillholes are laid out using hand-held GPS (accuracy ±2m) then all RC and DD collars are DGPS surveyed accurately (± 0.1m) by trained surveyors on completion.Drill holes were surveyed during drilling to maintain drilling direction. Diamond drill holes are multi-shot at 6m intervals on retrieval of rod string using a multi shot electronic camera.

Specification of the grid system used. GDA94, MGA (Zone 55). Quality and adequacy of topographic control. The area is very flat. A site based digital terrain model was developed from accurate (± 0.1m) survey control by licenced surveyors. Topographic control is considered adequate.Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Infill drilling at the Roswell Western MZD is completed on a pattern of 10m x 15m pattern. At the other targets, the exploration stage is early and data spacing is variable with the focus on identifying new zones of mineralisation. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. The mineralisation domains tested by this drilling is classified as Inferred based on its data distribution and hosted in the same monzodiorite domain. All the new drilling intersected the monzodiorite host and their spacing and distribution will be sufficient to further inform this Inferred resource mineralisation domain.All the other results are early stage, reconnaissance drilling, and as such are spaced to test strike and dip extents of any significant mineralisation.

Whether sample compositing has been applied. DD – diamond core interval samples are based on geological logging, and are simple intervals as described earlier in the table.RC – samples with no visible mineralisation or alteration are composited to 3m with 1m resamples assayed if the composite returned a gold value of >0.2g/t gold. One metre samples override 3m composites in the database.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. At Roswell, much care was given to attempt to intersect mineralisation at an optimal angle but location of drill drives is the major determination of intersection angle. Most holes are 80% of true thickness.At other targets, drilling suggests a broadly sub vertical geometry at most prospects.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. It is not thought that drilling direction will bias assay data.Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. All samples were bagged in tied numbered calico bags, grouped into larger tied polyweave bags and transported to the laboratory in Orange by courier. Sample submission sheets were delivered with the samples and also emailed to the laboratory. All sample submissions were documented via ALS tracking system and all assays were reported via email.Sample pulps were returned to site and were stored for an appropriate length of time (minimum 3 years).

The Company has in place protocols to ensure data security.

Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. The Company does not routinely have external consultants verify exploration data until resource estimation procedures are deemed necessary.    Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)

CriteriaJORC Code explanationCommentaryMineral tenement and land tenure status Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The three Tomingley mining licences are held in the name of Tomingley Gold Operations Pty Ltd (TGO), a wholly owned subsidiary of Alkane Resources Ltd. The Roswell deposit is within ML 1858.All seven exploration licences (EL5675, EL5942, EL6085, EL6319, EL8676, EL8794 and EL9597) in the Tomingley Gold Project are owned 100% by Alkane.

The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. ML1684 and ML 1821 expire on 11 February 2034. ML 1858 expires on 19 July 2044.All exploration licences are in good standing. EL5675 expires on 17 January 2029. EL5942 expires on 3 May 2030. EL6085 expires on 20 May 2030. EL6319 expires on 12 October 2026. EL8676 expires on 27 November 2029. EL8794 expires on 20 September 2030. EL9597 expires on 22 August 2029. There are currently no known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.

Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Only minor work has been completed by previous companies within EL5675, EL5942 and EL6319 covered by this announcement with many previous holes that did not penetrate the cover sequence.Alkane 100% discovered and developed the Tomingley Gold Operations.

Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Mineralisation is associated with quartz veining and alteration focused within sub-volcanic basaltic-andesite sills and adjacent volcaniclastic sediments. The deposits appear to have formed as the result of a rheological contrast between the porphyritic sub-volcanic sills and the surrounding volcaniclastic sediments, with the sills showing brittle fracture and the sediments ductile deformation and have many similarities to well documented orogenic - lode-style gold deposits.Geological nature of the Tomingley and Peak Hill Deposits are well documented elsewhere.

Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: easting and northing of the drill hole collarelevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collardip and azimuth of the holedown hole length and interception depthhole length. See body of announcement. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. All RC and DD drill holes have been reported in this announcement.Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Exploration results reported for uncut gold grades, grades calculated by length weighted average. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. Reported intercepts for exploration drilling are calculated using a broad lower cut of 0.2g/t Au and for Underground Resource drilling at Roswell using a broad lower cut of 1.0g/t Au. Although grades lower than these may be present internally (internal dilution).Short intervals of high grades that have a material impact on overall intersection are reported as separate (included) intervals.

The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. No metal equivalents are reported.Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Reported results include the drilled width and an estimate of true width.At Roswell the true width is approximately 80% of the drilled width. The majority of the exploration drilling is reconnaissance in nature. Down hole lengths are reported – true widths estimated to be 50% of the down hole lengths at El Paso and unknown at the other prospects at this early stage exploration stage.

Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Cross sections and plans showing drilling with 3D geological modelling are included in the body of this announcement for data rich areas. Plans showing geology with drill collars with an appropriate sectional view for the significant results at El Paso prospect are also included.Balanced reporting Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. Comprehensive reporting has been undertaken with all drill holes listed in the included table.Other substantive exploration data Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. No other exploration data is considered meaningful for reporting.Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). See body of announcement. Further underground drilling will be undertaken to improve resource classification from Inferred to Indicated at Roswell. Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. See figures included in the announcement. Photos accompanying this announcement are available at 

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ec242d36-268b-46e3-b0b1-532d44660a80

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3d2014ef-6ddc-49c6-b0f6-70e31fd21c68

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/9691d2b9-f81a-4297-b0fa-0cb848e47824

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/c41fc49d-6d76-4a88-a6be-cb7427380e1c

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e4f5c85b-743c-4197-81b2-7651b78bb12d

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3848bdd0-d46f-4b58-a989-598b864e6fa6

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3c797583-cc39-4102-a979-3c54b62da1ab

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e2bd0394-44c2-4bc0-935e-e60a63603a57

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Plug Power To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Plug Power between January 17, 2025 and November 13, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 23, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Plug Power Inc. ("Plug Power" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PLUG) and reminds investors of the April 3, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (i) Defendants had materially overstated the likelihood that funds attributed to the DOE Loan would ultimately become available to Plug Power, and/or that Plug Power would ultimately construct the hydrogen production facilities necessary to receive those funds; (ii) as such, Plug Power was likely to pivot toward more modest projects with less commercial upside; and (iii) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On October 7, 2025, Plug Power issued a press release and filed a current report on Form 8-K with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announcing that Defendant Andrew Marsh would step down from his role as the Company's Chief Executive Officer, "effective as of the date [Plug Power] files its [2025] Annual Report", and that Sanjay Shrestha would step down from his role as the Company's President, "effective as of October 10, 2025[.]" Plug Power concurrently announced the appointment of Chief Revenue Officer Jose Luis Crespo to both roles. The abrupt departure of two key executives just one month before the expected issuance of Plug Power's financial and operating results for the third quarter plainly did not bode well for the Company.

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.26 per share, or 6.29%, to close at $3.87 per share later that day.

Then, on November 10, 2025, Plug Power issued a press release reporting its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, and filed a quarterly report on Form 10-Q with the SEC that reported the same. That same day, Plug Power held a related conference call to discuss those results. During the call, Defendants announced that they expected to generate more than $275 million in liquidity after signing a nonbinding letter of intent to monetize their electricity rights in New York and one other location in partnership with a major U.S. data center developer, and that "[a]s a result, we have suspended activities under the DOE loan program, allowing us to redeploy capital". This represented a significant pivot for Plug Power. Defendants had not previously discussed the possibility of suspending activities under the DOE Loan and during the Class Period, and, just eight months earlier, had specifically advised analysts that they should "not expect revenue from that segment [i.e., data center power generation] of any size over the next two to three years".

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.09 per share, or 3.39%, to close at $2.53 per share on November 11, 2025.

Then, during market hours on November 13, 2025, The Washington Examiner reported that Plug Power "confirmed . . . that it suspended activities" on "its plans to construct six facilities to produce and liquefy zero or low-carbon hydrogen, putting at risk" the $1.66 billion DOE Loan it closed in January.

On this news, Plug Power's stock price fell $0.48 per share, or 17.58%, over the following two trading sessions, to close at $2.25 per share on November 14, 2025.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Plug Power's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Plug Power Inc. class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/PLUG or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/284958

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

While Salesforce's business performance has been impressive, the stock still might not be cheap enough to make it an obvious buy.

Shares of enterprise software giant Salesforce (CRM 3.78%) have been under pressure early in 2026. And with the company reporting its fourth-quarter and full-year fiscal 2026 results after market close on Wednesday, it may be tempting to buy now and hope for a rebound following what will hopefully be a strong fiscal fourth-quarter update. After all, if results and guidance land ahead of expectations, the stock could rip higher.

But I'm still not buying, and it's not because I'm trying to time the quarter. My issue is longer-term: Salesforce's (1) stock-based compensation is still heavy relative to its growth profile, and (2) AI (artificial intelligence) is changing the software landscape in ways that make it harder to predict durable profit margins and pricing power over the long haul.

Image source: Getty Images.

Hefty stock-based compensation Of course, my reasoning for staying on the sidelines doesn't mean Salesforce's business isn't doing great. It is. In the software-as-a-service company's third quarter of fiscal 2026 (ended Oct. 31, 2025), revenue rose 9% year over year to $10.3 billion, and free cash flow was $2.2 billion, up 22%.

But the stock-based compensation line is the part I can't get past.

In that same quarter, Salesforce reported $805 million of stock-based compensation expense (excluding stock-based compensation tied to restructuring). That is roughly 8% of quarterly revenue. For comparison, Alphabet, a faster-growing tech company, saw its stock-based compensation equal about 6% of revenue in 2025.

Sure, Salesforce can afford it. But shareholders still pay for it one way or another. If the company issues stock to employees, each share represents a slightly smaller claim on the business over time.

That said, the company has been repurchasing its shares to more than offset the dilution from stock-based compensation. In Q3, it returned $4.2 billion to shareholders, including $3.8 billion in share repurchases and $395 million in dividends. This is a decent quarterly sum for a company that has a market capitalization of about $170 billion.

Still, I'd prefer to see Salesforce operate more frugally with its equity, since the company isn't the fast-growing tech company it used to be.

Today's Change

(

-3.78

%) $

-7.00

Current Price

$

178.16

AI is exciting, but it introduces uncertainty Salesforce, of course, is leaning hard into AI. And the company seems to be seeing promising results.

In its most recent earnings call, management specifically called out momentum in its AI-based products. Agentforce, Salesforce's enterprise platform for the creation of AI agents, and Data 360's (the cloud-based data platform powering Agentforce) annual recurring revenue, for example, reached nearly $1.4 billion, up 114% year over year, and the company said it processed more than 3.2 trillion tokens through its large language model (LLM) gateway.

The risk, however, is that AI intensifies competition while simultaneously lowering margins. Even if AI drives more demand, it can also introduce new costs to serve customers. And it can make it easier for larger competitors to use AI to upsell bundled features or narrow product gaps.

That uncertainty would be easier to accept if the stock clearly offered a big margin of safety. But with revenue growth in the high single digits (not the double digits), I want more clarity on what the "steady state" will look like for Salesforce as AI becomes more central to the platform. Sure, the stock doesn't look expensive with its price-to-earnings ratio currently around 24, but it's arguably not cheap enough either -- at least given the uncertain environment.

Of course, by not buying the stock before earnings, I may miss out if the company reports better-than-expected results and management shares impressive guidance. But that's OK with me. I'd rather wait for more clarity or an even lower price before considering buying the stock.

BOCA RATON, Fla., Feb. 23, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ClearThink 1 Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: CTAAU) (the "Company"), a Cayman Islands exempted company, announced today that it priced its initial public offering of 12,500,000 units at $10.00 per unit. The units are expected to be listed on the Nasdaq Global Market ("NASDAQ") and trade under the ticker symbol "CTAAU" beginning on February 24, 2026. Each unit consists of one (1) Class A ordinary share and one (1) right to receive one-fifth (1/5) of one Class A ordinary share. Once the securities comprising the units begin separate trading, the Class A ordinary shares and rights are expected to be listed on NASDAQ under the symbols "CTAA" and "CTAAR", respectively.

D. Boral Capital LLC is acting as sole book-running manager in the offering. The underwriters have been granted a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 units offered by the Company to cover over-allotments, if any. The offering is expected to close on February 25, 2026, subject to customary closing conditions.

A registration statement relating to these securities was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 2026. The offering is being made only by means of a prospectus. Copies of the prospectus may be obtained, when available, from D. Boral Capital LLC, Attn: Syndicate Department, 590 Madison Ave., 39th Floor, New York, New York 10022, by telephone at (212) 970-5150 or by email at [email protected]. Copies of the registration statement can be accessed through the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. is acting as U.S. counsel for the Company and Ogier (Cayman) LLP is acting as Cayman Islands counsel for the Company. Sichenzia Ross Ference Carmel LLP is acting as counsel for the underwriters.

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

About ClearThink 1 Acquisition Corp.

ClearThink 1 Acquisition Corp. is a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. Although the Company is not limited to a particular industry or geographic region for purposes of consummating an initial business combination, it intends to focus on the financial services sector in the United States and other developed countries.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains statements that constitute "forward-looking statements," including with respect to the anticipated use of the net proceeds. No assurance can be given that the net proceeds of the offering will be used as indicated. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous conditions, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including those set forth in the Risk Factors section of the Registration Statement and related prospectus filed in connection with the initial public offering with the SEC. Copies are available on the SEC's website, www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release, except as required by law.

Contact:

Ari Brown

[email protected]

Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The article is for informational purposes only (not a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell stocks). David is not a registered investment adviser. Investors should do their own research or consult a financial adviser to determine what investments are appropriate for their individual situation. This article expresses my opinions, and I cannot guarantee that the information/results will be accurate. Investing in stocks involves risk and could result in losses.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Paysafe To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Paysafe between March 4, 2025 and November 12, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - February 23, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Paysafe Limited ("Paysafe" or the "Company") (NYSE: PSFE) and reminds investors of the April 7, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Paysafe's ecommerce business had significant exposure to a single high risk client; (2) as a result, the Company's credit loss reserves and/or write-offs were understated; (3) Paysafe had an undisclosed issue with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, making its client services difficult to bank; (4) the foregoing issues were likely to have a material negative impact on the Company's revenue growth and overall revenue mix; (5) as a result, Paysafe was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025; and (6) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On November 13, 2025, before the market opened, Paysafe announced third quarter financial results, including revenue of $433.8 million, which missed consensus estimates by $5.8 million, and a net loss of $87.7 million, a steep drop from the prior year period wherein the Company's net loss was only $12.98 million. The Company also slashed full year 2025 expected revenue to $17 million at the midpoint, and adjusted EPS $0.50 at the midpoint.

The Company further revealed that its credit loss expense for the quarter was $13,220 "primarily [as] the result of a specific provision for expected chargebacks related to an individual merchant in the Merchant Solutions segment." The report revealed write-offs of $9,924 "driven by the write off of irrecoverable amounts receivable in the Merchant Solutions segment."

On the same date, the Company held an earnings call during which CEO Bruce Lowthers revealed the Company "had a last-minute client that had to shut down that caused several million-dollar write-down in Q3." Lowthers further revealed the Company is in a market tier with "higher risk MCC [Merchant Category Codes] codes." Lowthers explained "those things sometimes are a little difficult to bank" and "sometimes the banks aren't open to the additional risk" "so, we've had a little bit of challenge with that with some of those MCC codes."

On this news, Paysafe's stock price fell $2.80, or 27.6%, to close at $7.36 per share on November 13, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Paysafe's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Paysafe Limited class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/PSFE or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/284956

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

, /PRNewswire/ -- PPL Corporation (NYSE: PPL) today announced it has priced its public offering of 20,000,000 Equity Units. Each Equity Unit will be issued in a stated amount of $50 ($1,000,000,000 aggregate stated amount) and will initially be in the form of a Corporate Unit consisting of a contract to purchase PPL Corporation common stock in the future, a 1/40 undivided beneficial ownership interest in PPL Capital Funding Inc.'s 4.02% Remarketable Senior Notes due 2034 having a principal amount of $1,000 and a 1/40 undivided beneficial ownership interest in PPL Capital Funding Inc.'s 4.02% Remarketable Senior Notes due 2039 having a principal amount of $1,000. Each of the Remarketable Senior Notes is subject to remarketing, subject to certain conditions and during certain periods. The offering is expected to close on February 26, 2026, subject to customary closing conditions.

PPL Corporation intends to apply to list the corporate units on The New York Stock Exchange and expects trading to commence within 30 days of the date of initial issuance (subject to listing approval).

Total distributions on the Corporate Units will be at the rate of 7.00% per year, consisting of interest payments on the Remarketable Senior Notes due 2034, interest payments on the Remarketable Senior Notes due 2039 and contract adjustment payments under the related stock purchase contracts. Under the purchase contracts, holders are required to purchase a variable number of shares of PPL Corporation common stock no later than February 15, 2029. The reference price for the purchase contracts is $37.2606 per share, which is approximately equal to the closing price of PPL Corporation common stock on The New York Stock Exchange on February 23, 2026. The minimum settlement rate under the purchase contracts is 1.0735 shares of PPL Corporation common stock, which is approximately equal to the $50 stated amount per Equity Unit divided by the threshold appreciation price of $46.5766 per share, which represents a premium of approximately 25.00% over the reference price. The maximum settlement rate under the purchase contracts is 1.3419 shares of PPL Corporation common stock, which is approximately equal to the $50 stated amount per Equity Unit divided by the reference price. Each of the settlement rates is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. 

PPL Corporation has granted the underwriters an option to purchase within the 13-day period beginning on, and including, the initial issuance date of the Equity Units up to 3,000,000 additional Corporate Units (an additional $150,000,000 aggregate stated amount), solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments.

PPL Corporation expects to use the net proceeds from this offering, which are expected to be approximately $981 million (or approximately $1,128 million if the over-allotment option is exercised in full), after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions but before deducting estimated offering expenses, to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, BofA Securities, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and RBC Capital Markets, LLC will be joint book-running managers for the offering.

The offering is being made under an effective shelf registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy the securities described herein, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities law of any such jurisdiction. Any offers of the securities will be made exclusively by means of a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus. Copies of these documents may be obtained from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Attention: c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, or email: [email protected] and [email protected]; BofA Securities at NC1-022-02-25, 201 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28255-0001 Attn: Prospectus Department, or by email at [email protected]; Morgan Stanley Prospectus Department at Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attn: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014, by telephone at (866) 718-1649 or by email at [email protected]; or RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Attn: Equity Capital Markets, 200 Vesey Street, 8th floor, New York, New York 10281, by telephone at 877-822-4089 or by email at [email protected].

About PPL
PPL Corporation (NYSE: PPL), based in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a leading U.S. energy company focused on providing electricity and natural gas safely, reliably and affordably to more than 3.6 million customers in the U.S. PPL's high-performing, award-winning utilities are addressing energy challenges head-on by building smarter, more resilient and more dynamic power grids and advancing sustainable energy solutions.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release, including without limitation terms and phrases that include "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "estimate," "expect," "continue," "should," "could," "may," "plan," "project," "predict," "will," "potential," "forecast," "target," "guidance," "outlook," or other similar terminology, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although PPL Corporation believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the statements. The following are among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: weather conditions affecting customer energy usage and operating costs; strategic acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures or similar transactions and our ability to consummate these business transactions, integrate the acquired entities or realize expected benefits from them; the outcome of rate cases or other cost recovery, revenue or regulatory proceedings, which may address structures or mechanisms regarding data centers and other large-load customers; catastrophic events such as epidemic or pandemic health events, wildfires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes and other extreme weather-related events (including events potentially caused or exacerbated by climate change) and their effect on financial markets, economic conditions and our businesses; market demand for energy in our service territories including uncertainties related to projected rapid growth in electricity demand driven primarily by data centers and other large-load customers and the related requirement for substantial new generation and transmission investment, which may create capital access, revenue recovery and customer affordability risks; the direct or indirect effects on PPL Corporation or its subsidiaries or business systems of cyber-based intrusion or the threat of cyberattacks; development, adoption and use of artificial intelligence by us, our customers and our third-party vendors; volatility in or the impact of other changes on financial markets, commodity prices and economic conditions, including inflation; the effect of any business or industry restructuring; the profitability and liquidity of PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries; new accounting requirements or new interpretations or applications of existing requirements; operating performance of our facilities; the length of scheduled and unscheduled outages at our generating plants; environmental conditions and requirements and the related costs of compliance; system conditions and operating costs; development of new projects, markets and technologies; performance of new ventures; any impact of severe weather on our business; receipt of necessary government permits, approvals, rate relief and regulatory cost recovery; capital market conditions and decisions regarding capital structure; the impact of state, federal or foreign investigations applicable to PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries; the outcome of litigation against PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries; PPL Corporation's stock price performance; the market prices of equity securities and the impact on pension income and resultant cash funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans; the securities and credit ratings of PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries; political, regulatory or economic conditions in jurisdictions where PPL Corporation or its subsidiaries conduct business, including any potential effects of threatened or actual cyberattack, terrorism or war or other hostilities; new state, federal or foreign legislation, including new tax legislation; and the commitments and liabilities of PPL Corporation and its subsidiaries. Any such forward-looking statements should be considered in light of such important factors and in conjunction with factors and other matters discussed in PPL Corporation's Form 10-K and other reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Note to Editors: Visit our media website at www.pplnewsroom.com for additional news about PPL Corporation.

Contacts:

For news media: Ryan Hill, 610-774-4033
For financial analysts: Andy Ludwig, 610-774-3389

SOURCE PPL Services Corporation

Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR - Free Report) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.31 per share versus the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.42. This compares to a loss of $0.76 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +26.89%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post a loss of $0.7 per share when it actually produced a loss of $1.17, delivering a surprise of -67.14%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates just once.

Vir Biotechnology, which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Biomedical and Genetics industry, posted revenues of $64.07 million for the quarter ended December 2025, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 243.23%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $12.37 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters.

The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.

Vir Biotechnology shares have added about 25.4% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 0.9%.

What's Next for Vir Biotechnology?While Vir Biotechnology has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?

There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.

Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.

Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Vir Biotechnology was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is -$0.60 on $2.41 million in revenues for the coming quarter and -$2.94 on $13.28 million in revenues for the current fiscal year.

Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Medical - Biomedical and Genetics is currently in the top 37% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.

One other stock from the same industry, Caribou Biosciences, Inc. (CRBU - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended December 2025.

This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.33 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +15.4%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.

Caribou Biosciences, Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $2.53 million, up 21.4% from the year-ago quarter.

Brighthouse Financial (BHF - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $3.93 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5.19 per share. This compares to earnings of $5.88 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -24.31%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this annuity and life insurance company would post earnings of $5.09 per share when it actually produced earnings of $4.54, delivering a surprise of -10.81%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has not been able to surpass consensus EPS estimates.

Brighthouse Financial, which belongs to the Zacks Insurance - Life Insurance industry, posted revenues of $2.17 billion for the quarter ended December 2025, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 2.71%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $2.27 billion. The company has not been able to beat consensus revenue estimates over the last four quarters.

The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.

Brighthouse Financial shares have lost about 1.3% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 0.9%.

What's Next for Brighthouse Financial?While Brighthouse Financial has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?

There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.

Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.

Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Brighthouse Financial was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $5.04 on $2.25 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $20.56 on $8.97 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.

Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Insurance - Life Insurance is currently in the top 29% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.

One other stock from the same industry, Citizens (CIA - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended December 2025.

This insurance company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.08 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +14.3%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.

Citizens' revenues are expected to be $67.89 million, up 0.4% from the year-ago quarter.

Helix Energy (HLX - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.16 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of a loss of $0.02 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.13 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +900.00%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this offshore oil and gas services contractor would post earnings of $0.15 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.15, delivering no surprise.

Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times.

Helix Energy, which belongs to the Zacks Oil and Gas - Field Services industry, posted revenues of $334.16 million for the quarter ended December 2025, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 12.28%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $355.13 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters.

The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.

Helix Energy shares have added about 42.6% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 0.9%.

What's Next for Helix Energy?While Helix Energy has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?

There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.

Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.

Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Helix Energy was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is -$0.04 on $258.73 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $0.38 on $1.32 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.

Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Oil and Gas - Field Services is currently in the top 31% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.

One other stock from the same industry, Tetra Technologies (TTI - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended December 2025. The results are expected to be released on February 25.

This oil and gas services company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.03 per share in its upcoming report, which represents no change from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.

Tetra Technologies' revenues are expected to be $142.4 million, up 5.9% from the year-ago quarter.

Diversified Healthcare (DHC - Free Report) came out with quarterly funds from operations (FFO) of $0.09 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.12 per share. This compares to FFO of $0.02 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarterly report represents an FFO surprise of -25.00%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this residential care real estate investment trust would post FFO of $0.08 per share when it actually produced FFO of $0.04, delivering a surprise of -50%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus FFO estimates just once.

Diversified Healthcare, which belongs to the Zacks REIT and Equity Trust - Other industry, posted revenues of $379.57 million for the quarter ended December 2025, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.53%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $379.62 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters.

The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future FFO expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.

Diversified Healthcare shares have added about 28.7% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 0.9%.

What's Next for Diversified Healthcare?While Diversified Healthcare has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?

There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's FFO outlook. Not only does this include current consensus FFO expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.

Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of estimate revisions.

Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Diversified Healthcare was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus FFO estimate is $0.14 on $395.44 million in revenues for the coming quarter and $0.57 on $1.61 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year.

Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, REIT and Equity Trust - Other is currently in the bottom 35% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.

Another stock from the same industry, RLJ Lodging (RLJ - Free Report) , has yet to report results for the quarter ended December 2025. The results are expected to be released on February 26.

This hotel real estate investment trust is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.28 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -15.2%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.

RLJ Lodging's revenues are expected to be $323.02 million, down 2.1% from the year-ago quarter.