Coinbase spouští futures, perpetuals a kryptoměnové opce pro profesionální investory ve Spojeném království. Nabídka přes Coinbase International Exchange zahrnuje více než 170 kontraktů a může podpořit aktivitu kolem Etherea.
Coinbase has announced the launch of futures, perpetuals, and crypto options for professional investors in the United Kingdom. This expansion is facilitated through the Coinbase International Exchange and is geared towards professional clients rather than the general retail market. The offering includes over 170 contracts covering various asset classes, with specific options for crypto limited to calls, puts, and multi-leg strategies. This move comes after Coinbase received regulatory authorization in the UK to offer investment services and derivatives, indicating a strategic push to enhance its presence in the UK derivatives market.
Advertisement
The launch is expected to influence market dynamics, with potential implications for Ethereum pricing. The introduction of derivatives could indicate increased market activity and demand, especially in the Ethereum segment, which might affect its future price trajectory. Current market activity reflects low probability estimates for Ethereum reaching notable price points by the end of 2026, suggesting cautious market sentiment despite this development.
Key Takeaways Coinbase’s new offering appears consistent with increased activity and demand in the UK derivatives market, potentially impacting Ethereum. Current market pricing suggests a cautious outlook on Ethereum reaching higher price thresholds by the end of 2026. The launch reflects Coinbase’s strategic expansion under UK regulatory oversight, covering a wide range of asset contracts. What to Watch Market participants will monitor how this expansion affects Ethereum pricing and overall market liquidity in the derivatives segment. Key developments include potential regulatory impacts as the UK’s cryptoasset regime evolves by October 2027. Observers should also watch for any shifts in institutional interest or volume that could indicate broader market reactions to Coinbase’s enhanced offerings.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31, 2026 1.4% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.5% — — View market → December 31, 2026 2.7% — — View market → December 31, 2026 4% — — View market → December 31, 2026 4.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 11% — — View market → January 1 2027 12% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.1% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 3.8% — — View market → January 1 2027 6.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 42.6% — — View market → January 1 2027 7.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 2.9% — — View market → January 1 2027 39.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 21% — — View market → January 1 2027 17.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 85% — — View market → January 1 2027 54.5% — — View market →
Coinbase spouští v UK obchodování s futures, perpetuals a opcemi pro profesionální investory. Nabídne přes 170 kontraktů napříč kryptem, akciemi, komoditami a FX.
Coinbase on Tuesday said it is expanding derivatives access to professional investors in the UK. This represents another milestone for the crypto exchange amid its Everything Exchange strategy, following the rollout of 24/5 US stock trading to all users in the UK. COIN stock rebounds in premarket hours in Tuesday.
Coinbase Rolls Out Crypto Derivatives Trading in the UK Crypto exchange Coinbase is launching futures, perpetuals and options in the UK, rolling out access to professional investors over the coming months.
Eligible investors can trade over 170 contracts across crypto, stocks, commodities and forex. Among these, perpetual contracts support 24/7 trading with up to 50x leverage, while dated futures offer up to 20x leverage.
Also, crypto options support calls, puts, and multi-leg strategies. These services are exclusively available to qualified investors classified as professional clients.
The derivatives launch in the UK comes after Coinbase secured MiFID license from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) last month. The license enabled the crypto exchange to offer derivative contract trading to UK investors.
“This launch is part of our global commitment to build a unified, borderless, and fully transparent derivatives ecosystem. It gives professional traders the tools to navigate any market,” said Coinbase UK arm CEO Keith Grose.
As CoinGape reported recently, Coinbase launched 24/5 stock trading to all users in the UK. It enabled eligible UK investors to buy, sell, and hold US stocks alongside crypto and fiat in the same app.
COIN Stock Price Sees Slight Rebound Coinbase stock (COIN) is up 0.40% during the premarket trading hours on Tuesday. COIN stock closed 3.20% lower at $148.68 on Monday, as the broader US stock market fell on Iran’s refusal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Coinbase stock outlook revealed the price remains below the 20-day EMA and the 50-day EMA at $162. Also, the short-term momentum is favoring bears, with potential drop continuing unless buying pressure rises.
The derivatives trading expansion in the UK continues Coinbase’s push to diversify beyond pure crypto trading volume into a multi-asset platform.
Meanwhile, Bitcoin has also recorded a slight rebound after dropping more than 2% over the past 24 hours. The price is currently trading at $64,134, with a massive 45% bounce in trading volume.
Prediction markets show 26% odds for Bitcoin to dip below $60,000 in August, with Wednesday’s CPI inflation data as the major event to watch this week.
Genuit Group udržel celoroční výhled, i když první pololetí zůstalo slabé kvůli utlumené poptávce ve stavebnictví a vyšším cenám polymerů. Tržby vzrostly o 3 % a upravený provozní zisk klesl jen o 1,6 % na 43,9 milionu GBP.
Genuit Group LON: GEN said first-half trading remained challenging amid subdued construction demand, higher polymer costs and uncertainty linked to the Middle East conflict, but maintained its full-year expectations after reported revenue rose 3% and underlying operating profit declined only modestly.
Chief Executive Officer Joe Vorih said the company had responded with “balanced cost and price action,” simplification initiatives and continued investment in growth areas including ventilation, water management and lower-carbon products. He said the group expects its simplification programme to generate more than £4 million in annualised savings, primarily from 2027 onward.
Get Genuit Group alerts:
First-half results and cash generation Chief Financial Officer Tim Pullen reported revenue growth of 3% on a reported basis, supported by acquisitions completed in 2025. On a like-for-like basis, revenue declined about 5%, though this improved from an approximately 8% decline reported in the four months to April.
Underlying operating profit was £43.9 million, down 1.6% from the prior year, while EBIT margin declined by around 70 basis points. Pullen said gross margins remained resilient, reflecting cost control and price management, although results were affected by a lag between polymer cost inflation in March and April and price increases that took effect in May.
Water represented about 70% of group revenue, while climate represented just under 30%. Housebuilding accounted for roughly one-third of revenue, with repair, maintenance and improvement representing nearly another third. Non-housing markets, including commercial, civil engineering and infrastructure, contributed about 27% of revenue. International operations represented around 10% of revenue. Cash conversion exceeded 70% in the first half, in line with normal seasonal phasing, and the company remains on track for more than 90% cash conversion for the full year. Net debt was about £190 million, resulting in leverage of 1.6 times, within Genuit’s targeted range of one to two times. The interim dividend was held at 4.2 pence per share.
Climate division affected by Adey issues Climate division revenue rose 2.4% on a reported basis but fell 8% on a like-for-like basis. Pullen said ventilation had been among the group’s stronger markets, helped by commercial demand, particularly from schools, and residential demand linked to addressing damp and mould in social housing.
That performance was offset by weaker demand in heating-related repair, maintenance and improvement activity. Genuit’s Adey business, which supplies water treatment and filtration products associated with heating systems, faced lower renovation and refurbishment activity during the period.
Adey also incurred two specific first-half issues: a £1.5 million slow-moving stock provision and a supplier issue with an approximately £0.8 million impact, including lost sales and remediation costs. Pullen said both matters had been root-caused and were not expected to recur in the second half.
Vorih said Adey remains a quality, high-market-share business and has products relevant to both boilers and heat pumps. He said hydronic systems require cleaning and protection regardless of the heat source.
Genuit also highlighted progress at Monodraught, the ventilation business acquired in 2025. Orders in the 11 months following the acquisition were up 24% compared with the equivalent pre-acquisition period, according to Vorih. The company has developed an interface box that connects Monodraught hybrid ventilation systems with Nuaire mechanical ventilation equipment, creating a combined offering for schools and other commercial buildings.
The product went on sale in June, with production shipments expected in September. The company received its first orders in July, totaling more than £1 million across two projects.
Water business, Davidson integration and stormwater opportunity Water division revenue increased about 4% on a reported basis and declined approximately 3% on a like-for-like basis. Genuit cited subdued residential demand and delays in civil engineering and infrastructure projects, which it attributed to weaker business confidence.
However, Manthorpe, Genuit’s Italian business and its Irish operations all grew year over year during the first half. Pullen said the Middle East operation, which experienced direct revenue loss when conflict escalated in March and April, had returned “pretty much” to normal by June.
The water business was particularly exposed to polymer inflation. Pullen said virgin polymer grades had experienced cost increases ranging from 10% to more than 30%, while recycled material costs had risen less sharply. Genuit spent about £80 million on polymers last year, including roughly £50 million on virgin polymer and £30 million on recycled material.
The company introduced double-digit price increases across around 60% of the business. Pullen said costs had stabilized at elevated levels, but the situation remained volatile and could require further management if inflation or deflation emerged.
Genuit is also accelerating the integration of the Davidson acquisition. Two of Davidson’s three sites will be closed and their operations consolidated into larger Genuit facilities by the end of 2026, with no loss of capacity expected. The action is a major contributor to the anticipated £4 million-plus annualised cost savings from 2027.
Vorih pointed to growing opportunity in stormwater management under the AMP8 water investment cycle. The group’s active quote bank in this area rose to £9 million from £2 million a year earlier. Genuit has begun delivering projects, including an order for Yorkshire Water, though Vorih said the opportunity would have a more material impact in 2027.
Regulation and outlook Management said regulatory and sustainability drivers were moving closer. Vorih highlighted the Future Homes Standard, which requires new housing permits to comply from March 2027, followed by the expiry of the main grace period a year later. He said some larger housebuilders have already begun adopting relevant solutions, including underfloor heating.
Genuit estimates that its revenue opportunity per home could rise from approximately £800 to £1,200 for conventional plastic plumbing to between two and three times that amount, and potentially as much as five times in configurations using products such as underfloor heating, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery, filtration and wastewater heat recovery.
The group also cited school rebuilding standards, Awaab’s Law, water-sector investment and increasing demand for Environmental Product Declarations. More than 60% of Genuit revenue is now covered by such declarations, according to Vorih, and the company aims to exceed 80% coverage.
Looking ahead, Genuit expects market conditions to remain difficult through the rest of 2026. However, it expects second-half margins to benefit from the full impact of pricing actions, the absence of the Adey operational issues and productivity gains. Management confirmed that full-year expectations remain unchanged.
About Genuit Group (LON:GEN)Genuit Group plc is the UK's largest provider of sustainable water, climate and ventilation products for the built environment. Genuit's solutions allow customers to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change and meet evolving sustainability regulations and targets. The Group is divided into three Business Units, each of which addresses specific challenges in the built environment: - Climate Management Solutions - Addressing the drivers for low carbon heating and cooling, and clean and healthy air ventilation.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Should You Invest $1,000 in Genuit Group Right Now?Before you consider Genuit Group, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Genuit Group wasn't on the list.
While Genuit Group currently has a Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Discover the 10 Best High-Yield Dividend Stocks for 2026 and secure reliable income in uncertain markets. Download the report now to identify top dividend payers and avoid common yield traps.
Resources Investor Relations Journalists Agencies Client Login Send a Release
News Products Contact Hamburger menu Send a Release
DUBLIN, Ohio,, Aug. 11, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Cardinal Health (NYSE: CAH) announced today that its Board of Directors approved its quarterly dividend of $0.5158 per share, out of the Company's capital surplus. The dividend will be payable on October 15, 2026 to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 1, 2026.
About Cardinal Health
Cardinal Health is a distributor of pharmaceuticals and specialty products; a global manufacturer and distributor of medical and laboratory products; a supplier of home-health and direct-to-patient products and services; an operator of nuclear pharmacies and manufacturing facilities; and a provider of performance and data solutions. Our company's customer-centric focus drives continuous improvement and leads to innovative solutions that improve people's lives every day. Learn more about Cardinal Health at cardinalhealth.com and in our Newsroom.
Contacts
Media: Erich Timmerman, [email protected] and 614.757.8231
Investors: David Frost, [email protected] and 614.757.7852
Cardinal Health ve 4. čtvrtletí zvýšil tržby o 6 % na 63,7 miliardy USD a upravený zisk na akcii o 40 % na 2,91 USD. Pro fiskální rok 2027 očekává růst upraveného EPS o 13 % až 15 % na 12,40 až 12,60 USD.
Fourth quarter revenue increased 6% to $63.7 billion Fourth quarter GAAP1 diluted EPS increased 70% to $1.70 Excluding a one-time positive impact of $0.31 from the recognition of the IEEPA tariff refund, fourth quarter non-GAAP diluted EPS increased 25% to $2.60, with reported fourth quarter non-GAAP diluted EPS increasing 40% to $2.91 For fiscal year 2026, excluding the IEEPA tariff refund recognition, non-GAAP diluted EPS increased 33% to $10.95, with reported non-GAAP diluted EPS increasing 37% to $11.26 Fiscal year 2026 operating cash flow $5.2 billion and adjusted free cash flow $5.0 billion Incremental $350 million share repurchase completed, bringing fiscal year 2026 repurchase total to $1.4 billion, with $5.0 billion incremental repurchase authorization approved by board of directors Cardinal Health provides fiscal year 2027 non-GAAP EPS guidance2 of 13% to 15% growth3 ($12.40 to $12.60), above the Company's long-term EPS guidance , /PRNewswire/ -- Cardinal Health (NYSE: CAH) today reported fourth quarter fiscal year 2026 revenues of $63.7 billion, an increase of 6% from the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025. Fourth quarter GAAP operating earnings increased 70% to $729 million and GAAP diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased 70% to $1.70.
Fourth quarter non-GAAP operating earnings increased 30% to $935 million. Non-GAAP diluted EPS increased 40% to $2.91, reflecting the increase in non-GAAP earnings, including the recognition of a one-time net operating profit impact of IEEPA tariff refunds of $100 million in the GMPD segment, a lower non-GAAP effective tax rate, and a lower share count, partially offset by an increase in interest and other expense.
Fiscal year 2026 revenues were $254.2 billion, a 14% increase from fiscal year 2025. GAAP operating earnings were $2.6 billion and GAAP diluted EPS was $7.23. Non-GAAP operating earnings increased 30% to $3.6 billion, driven by segment profit increases across all five operating segments. Non-GAAP diluted EPS increased 37% to $11.26 for the year, reflecting the increase in non-GAAP operating earnings across the business, including the recognition of a one-time net operating profit impact of IEEPA tariff refunds of $100 million in the GMPD segment, a lower non-GAAP effective tax rate, and a lower share count following in-year share repurchases, partially offset by an increase in interest and other expense.
"Fiscal 2026 was a standout year for Cardinal Health and I am pleased with our strong fourth quarter results," said Jason Hollar, CEO of Cardinal Health. "The broad-based operational strength for the year, with all five of our operating segments growing profit double-digits, even before recognition of IEEPA tariff recoveries in GMPD, reflects the disciplined execution of our strategy and our investments for growth. We enter Fiscal 2027 with momentum and confidence in our ability to deliver continued shareholder value creation."
Q4 and full year FY26 summary
Q4 FY26
Q4 FY25
Y/Y
FY26
FY25
Y/Y
Revenue
$63.7 billion
$60.2 billion
6 %
$254.2 billion
$222.6 billion
14 %
Operating earnings
$729 million
$428 million
70 %
$2.6 billion
$2.3 billion
15 %
Non-GAAP operating earnings
$935 million
$719 million
30 %
$3.6 billion
$2.8 billion
30 %
Net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
$398 million
$239 million
67 %
$1.7 billion
$1.6 billion
10 %
Non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
$682 million
$501 million
36 %
$2.7 billion
$2.0 billion
34 %
Effective Tax Rate
27.9 %
36.9 %
21.6 %
25.3 %
Non-GAAP Effective Tax Rate
22.5 %
26.3 %
19.0 %
23.3 %
Diluted EPS attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
$1.70
$1.00
70 %
$7.23
$6.45
12 %
Non-GAAP diluted EPS attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
$2.91
$2.08
40 %
$11.26
$8.24
37 %
Segment results
Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions segment
Q4 FY26
Q4 FY25
Y/Y
FY26
FY25
Y/Y
Revenue
$58.8 billion
$55.4 billion
6 %
$234.8 billion
$204.6 billion
15 %
Segment profit
$645 million
$535 million
21 %
$2.8 billion
$2.3 billion
23 %
Fourth quarter revenue for the Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions segment increased 6% to $58.8 billion, driven by brand and specialty pharmaceutical sales growth from existing customers.
Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions segment profit increased 21% to $645 million in the fourth quarter, primarily driven by contributions from brand and specialty products and positive generics program performance.
Global Medical Products and Distribution segment
Q4 FY26
Q4 FY25
Y/Y
FY26
FY25
Y/Y
Revenue
$3.1 billion
$3.2 billion
(2) %
$12.7 billion
$12.6 billion
1 %
Segment profit
$150 million
$70 million
N.M.
$258 million
$135 million
91 %
Fourth quarter revenue for the Global Medical Products and Distribution segment decreased 2% from the prior year to $3.1 billion. This decrease was primarily driven by lower distribution volumes and the recognition of the expected IEEPA tariff refund repayment to customers, partially offset by Cardinal Health brand growth.
Global Medical Products and Distribution segment profit increased to $150 million in the fourth quarter, primarily driven by IEEPA tariff refunds.
Other4
Q4 FY26
Q4 FY25
Y/Y
FY26
FY25
Y/Y
Revenue
$1.7 billion
$1.6 billion
7 %
$6.8 billion
$5.4 billion
26 %
Segment profit
$183 million
$160 million
14 %
$707 million
$516 million
37 %
Fourth quarter revenue for Other increased 7% to $1.7 billion, driven by growth across the three operating segments: Nuclear and Precision Health Solutions, OptiFreight Logistics, and at-Home Solutions.
Other segment profit increased 14% to $183 million in the fourth quarter, driven by growth in OptiFreight Logistics and at-Home Solutions.
Fiscal year 2027 outlook2
The company released its fiscal year 2027 outlook for non-GAAP diluted EPS of +13% to +15% growth3 ($12.40 to $12.60).
Non-GAAP earnings per share
$12.40 to $12.60
Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions segment:
Revenue
3% to 5% growth
Segment profit
8% to 11% growth
Global Medical Products and Distribution segment:
Revenue
2% to 4% growth
Segment profit
$200 million to $220 million
Other (NPHS, at-Home Solutions, OptiFreight Logistics):
Revenue
11% to 13% growth
Segment profit
15% to 18% growth
Interest and other
$240 million to $290 million
Non-GAAP effective tax rate
19.0% to 20.0%
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
~233 million
Share repurchases
~$1 billion
Capital Expenditures
~$700 million
Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow
$3.5 billion to $4.0 billion
Financial guidance for fiscal year 2027 reflects the estimated impact of the Company's recently completed tuck-in acquisition of Strive Medical and the announced tuck-in acquisition of the Diabetes Health business of AdaptHealth.
Recent highlights
Cardinal Health recently completed an additional $350 million accelerated share repurchase program, bringing year-to-date share repurchases in fiscal year 2026 to $1.4 billion. Cardinal Health Board of Directors approved a $5.0 billion increase to the share repurchase program, bringing the total share repurchase authorization to $6.4 billion as of August 2026 Cardinal Health announces simplification of credit facilities with new $4.0 billion revolving credit facility replacing three historic facilities Cardinal Health announces long-term renewal of wholesaler distribution contract with Kroger New distribution center in Indianapolis set to open in 2027 featuring advanced robotics and automation, adding capacity and enabling operational flexibility Cardinal Health Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.5158 per share, payable on October 15, 2026, to shareholders of record on October 1, 2026 Webcast
Cardinal Health will host a webcast today at 8:30 a.m. ET to discuss fourth quarter and full year results. To access the webcast and corresponding slide presentation, go to the Investor Relations page at ir.cardinalhealth.com. No access code is required.
Presentation slides and a webcast replay will be available on the Investor Relations page for 12 months.
About Cardinal Health
Cardinal Health is a distributor of pharmaceuticals and specialty products; a global manufacturer and distributor of medical and laboratory products; a supplier of home-health and direct-to-patient products and services; an operator of nuclear pharmacies and manufacturing facilities; and a provider of performance and data solutions. Our company's customer-centric focus drives continuous improvement and leads to innovative solutions that improve people's lives every day. Learn more about Cardinal Health at cardinalhealth.com and in our Newsroom.
Contacts
Media: Erich Timmerman, [email protected] and 614.757.8231
Investors: David Frost, [email protected] and 614.757.7852
1GAAP refers to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This news release includes GAAP financial measures as well as non-GAAP financial measures, which are financial measures not calculated in accordance with GAAP. See "Use of Non-GAAP Measures" following the attached schedules for definitions of the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this news release and see the attached schedules for reconciliations of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measures and their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
2The company does not provide forward-looking guidance on a GAAP basis as certain financial information, the probable significance of which cannot be determined, is not available and cannot be reasonably estimated. See "Use of Non-GAAP Measures" following the attached schedules for additional explanation.
3Growth rates for fiscal year 2027 guidance based upon adjusted fiscal year 2026 results which exclude the fiscal year 2026 benefit from IEEPA tariff refund.
4Other includes the following three operating segments: Nuclear and Precision Health Solutions (NPHS), at-Home Solutions and OptiFreight Logistics, which are not significant enough individually to require reportable segment disclosure.
Cardinal Health uses its website as a channel of distribution for material company information. Important information, including news releases, financial information, earnings and analyst presentations, and information about upcoming presentations and events is routinely posted and accessible on the Investor Relations page at ir.cardinalhealth.com. In addition, the website allows investors and other interested persons to sign up automatically to receive email alerts when the company posts news releases, SEC filings and certain other information on its website.
Cautions Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This release contains forward-looking statements addressing expectations, prospects, estimates and other matters that are dependent upon future events or developments. These statements may be identified by words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "will," "should," "could," "would," "project," "continue," "likely," and similar expressions, and include statements reflecting future results or guidance, statements of outlook and various accruals and estimates. These matters are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied. These risks and uncertainties include our ability to manage uncertainties associated with the pricing of branded pharmaceuticals including those arising from proposed or final regulatory changes, the risk that we may fail to achieve our strategic objectives, including the ongoing integration and operation of recently acquired entities and the continued execution of the GMPD Improvement Plan initiatives and ; risks and uncertainties related to tariffs, including the risk that we may not be able to offset increased costs; competitive pressures in Cardinal Health's various lines of business, including the risk that customers may reduce purchases made under their contracts with us or terminate or not renew their contracts, whether due to price increases or otherwise; risks associated with litigation matters, including Department of Justice investigations focused on potential violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act; the risk that events outside of our control, such as weather or geopolitical events, including the recent conflict with Iran, may impact costs for our products or may cause supply delays or shortages or manufacturing delays that impact our cost and ability to fulfill customer demand; and the performance of our generics program, including the amount or rate of generic deflation and our ability to offset generic deflation and maintain other financial and strategic benefits through our generic sourcing venture or other components of our generics programs. Cardinal Health is subject to additional risks and uncertainties described in Cardinal Health's Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8K reports and exhibits to those reports. This release reflects management's views as of August 11, 2026. Except to the extent required by applicable law, Cardinal Health undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are aspirational and not guarantees or promises that goals, targets or projections will be met, and no assurance can be given that any commitment, expectation, initiative or plan in this report can or will be achieved or completed. Cardinal Health provides definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures and their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures at ir.cardinalhealth.com.
Schedule 1
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Earnings (Unaudited)
Fourth Quarter
Fiscal Year
(in millions, except per common share amounts)
2026
2025
% Change
2026
2025
% Change
Revenue
$ 63,672
$ 60,159
6 %
$ 254,248
$ 222,578
14 %
Cost of products sold
61,112
57,957
5 %
244,474
214,410
14 %
Gross margin
2,560
2,202
16 %
9,774
8,168
20 %
Operating expenses:
Distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses
1,625
1,484
10 %
6,132
5,382
14 %
Restructuring and employee severance
40
27
106
88
Amortization and other acquisition-related costs
121
133
469
464
Acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs
44
106
287
126
Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net 1
4
33
177
18
Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net
(3)
(9)
(10)
(185)
Operating earnings
729
428
70 %
2,613
2,275
15 %
Other (income)/expense, net
(26)
(30)
(31)
(41)
Interest expense, net
79
74
7 %
348
215
62 %
Impairment of equity interest in Outcomes
122
—
122
—
Earnings before income taxes
554
384
44 %
2,174
2,101
3 %
Provision for income taxes 2
154
141
9 %
469
532
(12) %
Net earnings
400
243
65 %
1,705
1,569
9 %
Less: Net (earnings)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(2)
(4)
9
(8)
Net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
$ 398
$ 239
67 %
$ 1,714
$ 1,561
10 %
Earnings per common share attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.:
Basic
$ 1.70
$ 1.01
68 %
$ 7.27
$ 6.48
12 %
Diluted
1.70
1.00
70 %
7.23
6.45
12 %
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic
234
239
236
241
Diluted
235
240
237
242
1 Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposals of assets, net includes pre-tax goodwill impairment charges of $184 million related to the Navista & ION reporting unit within the Pharma segment recorded in fiscal year ended 2026.
2 Provision for income taxes includes the tax effects relating to the cumulative goodwill impairment charges. For fiscal 2026, the net tax benefits related to the goodwill impairment charges was $23 million.
Schedule 2
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in millions)
June 30, 2026
June 30, 2025
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and equivalents
$ 4,856
$ 3,874
Trade receivables, net
13,815
13,242
Inventories, net
17,297
16,831
Prepaid expenses and other
2,764
2,414
Assets held for sale
21
12
Total current assets
38,753
36,373
Property and equipment, net
3,031
2,858
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
13,631
12,177
Other assets
1,884
1,714
Total assets
$ 57,299
$ 53,122
Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$ 38,283
$ 34,713
Current portion of long-term obligations and other short-term borrowings
1,882
550
Other accrued liabilities
3,739
3,634
Total current liabilities
43,904
38,897
Long-term obligations, less current portion
7,004
7,977
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities
9,115
8,882
Total shareholders' deficit
(2,724)
(2,634)
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit
$ 57,299
$ 53,122
Schedule 3
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Fourth Quarter
Fiscal Year
(in millions)
2026
2025
2026
2025
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings
$ 400
$ 243
$ 1,705
1,569
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
241
209
956
790
Impairments and (gain)/loss on sale of other investments, net
1
1
21
3
Impairment of equity interest in Outcomes
122
—
122
—
Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net
4
33
177
18
Share-based compensation
58
153
367
244
Provision for/(benefit from) deferred income taxes
91
243
91
243
Provision for bad debts
27
12
74
53
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures:
Increase in trade receivables
(193)
(466)
(408)
(833)
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
697
(607)
(488)
(1,816)
Increase in accounts payable
450
1,778
3,463
2,732
Repurchases of liability-classified Specialty Alliance Units
(18)
(19)
(45)
(19)
Other accrued liabilities and operating items, net
(188)
(60)
(861)
(587)
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,692
1,520
5,174
2,397
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
(24)
(1,395)
(1,991)
(5,250)
Additions to property and equipment
(264)
(232)
(649)
(547)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
—
—
31
3
Proceeds from investments
14
8
41
15
Proceeds from net investment hedge terminations
(6)
—
(13)
2
Proceeds from short-term investment in time deposit
—
—
—
200
Other investing items, net
(1)
(12)
(3)
(16)
Net cash used in investing activities
(281)
(1,631)
(2,584)
(5,593)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term obligations, net of issuance costs
(1)
800
990
3,669
Reduction of long-term obligations
(16)
(11)
(653)
(445)
Payments to noncontrolling interests, net
(3)
(5)
(11)
(12)
Net tax proceeds from share-based compensation
—
(1)
(79)
(13)
Dividends on common shares
(120)
(120)
(491)
(494)
Purchase of treasury shares
(350)
—
(1,358)
(765)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
(490)
663
(1,602)
1,940
Effect of exchange rates changes on cash and equivalents
(2)
(4)
(6)
(3)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and equivalents
919
548
982
(1,259)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
3,937
3,326
3,874
5,133
Cash and equivalents at end of period
$ 4,856
$ 3,874
$ 4,856
$ 3,874
Schedule 4
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Segment Information (Unaudited)
Fourth Quarter
Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions
Global Medical Products and Distribution
Other
(in millions)
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Revenue
Amount
$ 58,848
$ 55,372
$ 3,128
$ 3,199
$ 1,721
$ 1,609
Growth rate
6 %
— %
(2) %
3 %
7 %
37 %
Segment profit
Amount
$ 645
$ 535
$ 150
$ 70
$ 183
$ 160
Growth rate
21 %
11 %
N.M.
49 %
14 %
44 %
Segment profit margin
1.10 %
0.97 %
4.80 %
2.19 %
10.63 %
9.94 %
Fiscal Year
Pharmaceutical and Specialty Solutions
Global Medical Products and Distribution
Other
(in millions)
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Revenue
Amount
$ 234,833
$ 204,644
$ 12,719
$ 12,636
$ 6,792
$ 5,382
Growth rate
15 %
(3) %
1 %
2 %
26 %
19 %
Segment profit
Amount
$ 2,783
$ 2,258
$ 258
$ 135
$ 707
$ 516
Growth rate
23 %
12 %
91 %
47 %
37 %
22 %
Segment profit margin
1.19 %
1.10 %
2.03 %
1.07 %
10.41 %
9.59 %
The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.
Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net
—
—
33
33
9
—
24
0.10
Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net
—
—
(9)
(9)
(2)
—
(7)
(0.03)
Non-GAAP
$ 2,203
17 %
$ 1,484
16 %
$ 719
19 %
$ 676
$ 178
$ 3
$ 501
11 %
26.3 %
$ 2.08
13 %
1 For more information on these measures, refer to the Use of Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions schedules.
2 Distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses.
3 Attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
4 For fiscal 2026, we recognized a pre-tax impairment charge of $122 million related to our equity method investment in Outcomes due to an observed reduction in the estimated fair value of the business, which is included in impairment of equity interest in Outcomes in the consolidated statements of earnings. The net tax benefit related to this charge was $3 million and is included in the annual effective tax rate.
The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.
We generally apply varying tax rates depending on the item's nature and tax jurisdiction where it is incurred.
Schedule 5
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
GAAP / Non-GAAP Reconciliation1 (Unaudited)
Net
(Earnings)/
Loss
Gross
Operating
Earnings
Provision
Attributable
Net
Diluted
Margin
SG&A2
Earnings
Before
for
to Non-
Earnings3
Effective
EPS 3
Gross
Growth
Growth
Operating
Growth
Income
Income
Controlling
Net
Growth
Tax
Diluted
Growth
(in millions, except per common share amounts)
Margin
Rate
SG&A 2
Rate
Earnings
Rate
Taxes
Taxes
Interests
Earnings3
Rate
Rate
EPS 3
Rate
Fiscal Year 2026
GAAP
$ 9,774
20 %
$ 6,132
14 %
$ 2,613
15 %
$ 2,174
$ 469
$ 9
$ 1,714
10 %
21.6 %
$ 7.23
12 %
State opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years
Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net
—
—
18
18
5
—
13
0.05
Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net
—
—
(185)
(185)
(54)
—
(131)
(0.54)
Non-GAAP
$ 8,168
10 %
$ 5,382
8 %
$ 2,786
15 %
$ 2,612
$ 609
$ (8)
$ 1,995
7 %
23.3 %
$ 8.24
9 %
Fiscal Year 2024
GAAP
$ 7,414
8 %
$ 5,000
4 %
$ 1,243
65 %
$ 1,201
$ 348
$ (1)
$ 852
N.M.
28.9 %
$ 3.45
N.M.
Shareholder cooperation agreement costs
—
(1)
1
1
—
—
1
—
Restructuring and employee severance
—
—
175
175
41
—
134
0.54
Amortization and other acquisition-related costs
—
—
284
284
74
—
210
0.85
Impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net 5
—
—
634
634
47
—
587
2.38
Litigation (recoveries)/charges, net
—
—
78
78
5
—
73
0.30
Non-GAAP
$ 7,414
8 %
$ 5,000
4 %
$ 2,414
16 %
$ 2,372
$ 515
$ (1)
$ 1,856
21 %
21.7 %
$ 7.53
29 %
1 For more information on these measures, refer to the Use of Non-GAAP Measures and Definitions schedules.
2 Distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses.
3 Attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.
4 For fiscal 2026, we recognized a pre-tax impairment charge of $122 million related to our equity method investment in Outcomes due to an observed reduction in the estimated fair value of the business, which is included in impairment of equity interest in Outcomes in the consolidated statements of earnings. The net tax benefit related to this charge was $3 million and is included in the annual effective tax rate.
5 For fiscal 2026 and 2024, impairments and (gain)/loss on disposals of assets, net includes pre-tax goodwill impairment charges of $184 million related to the Navista & ION reporting unit within the Pharma segment and $675 million related to the GMPD segment, respectively. For fiscal 2026 and 2024 the net tax benefit related to these charges was $23 million and $58 million, respectively, and were included in the annual effective tax rates. The portion of the goodwill impairment charge within the Navista & ION reporting unit attributable to noncontrolling interests was $23 million for fiscal 2026.
The sum of the components and certain computations may reflect rounding adjustments.
We generally apply varying tax rates depending on the item's nature and tax jurisdiction where it is incurred.
Distribution, Selling, General and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses, excluding Acquisitions
Consolidated
Fourth Quarter
Fiscal Year
(in millions)
2026
2025
% Change
2026
2025
% Change
SG&A expenses
$ 1,625
$ 1,484
10 %
$ 6,132
$ 5,382
14 %
Less: Recent acquisitions1
198
157
26 %
767
254
N.M.
SG&A expenses, excluding recent acquisitions
$ 1,427
$ 1,327
8 %
$ 5,365
$ 5,128
5 %
1Recent acquisitions include Integrated Oncology Network (December 2024), GI Alliance (January 2025), Advanced Diabetes Supply Group (April 2025), Urology America (May 2025), and Solaris Health (November 2025).
Cardinal Health, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Use of Non-GAAP Measures
This earnings release contains financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").
In addition to analyzing our business based on financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP, we use these non-GAAP financial measures internally to evaluate our performance, engage in financial and operational planning, and determine incentive compensation because we believe that these measures provide additional perspective on and, in some circumstances are more closely correlated to, the performance of our underlying, ongoing business. We provide these non-GAAP financial measures to investors as supplemental metrics to assist readers in assessing the effects of items and events on our financial and operating results on a year-over-year basis and in comparing our performance to that of our competitors. However, the non-GAAP financial measures that we use may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, similarly titled measures used by other companies. The non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by us should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations to those financial statements set forth below should be carefully evaluated.
Exclusions from Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Management believes it is useful to exclude the following items from the non-GAAP measures presented in this report for its own and for investors' assessment of the business for the reasons identified below:
LIFO charges and credits are excluded because the factors that drive last-in first-out ("LIFO") inventory charges or credits, such as pharmaceutical manufacturer price appreciation or deflation and year-end inventory levels (which can be meaningfully influenced by customer buying behavior immediately preceding our fiscal year-end), are largely out of our control and cannot be accurately predicted. The exclusion of LIFO charges and credits from non-GAAP metrics facilitates comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results and to our peer group companies' financial results. We did not recognize any LIFO charges or credits during the periods presented. State opioid assessments related to prior fiscal years is the portion of state assessments for prescription opioid medications that were sold or distributed in periods prior to the period in which the expense is incurred. This portion is excluded from non-GAAP financial measures because it is retrospectively applied to sales in prior fiscal years and inclusion would obscure analysis of the current fiscal year results of our underlying, ongoing business. Additionally, while states' laws may require us to make payments on an ongoing basis, the portion of the assessment related to sales in prior periods are contemplated to be one-time, nonrecurring items. Income from state opioid assessments related to prior fiscal years represents reversals of accruals due to changes in estimates or when the underlying assessments were invalidated by a court or reimbursed by manufacturers. Shareholder cooperation agreement costs includes costs such as legal, consulting, and other expenses incurred in relation to the agreement (the "Cooperation Agreement") entered into among Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P. (together, "Elliott"), and Cardinal Health. These include costs incurred to negotiate and finalize the Cooperation Agreement and costs incurred by the Business Review Committee of the Board of Directors, formed under this Cooperation Agreement, tasked with undertaking a comprehensive review of our strategy, portfolio, capital allocation framework, and operations. We have excluded these costs from our non-GAAP metrics because they do not occur in or reflect the ordinary course of our ongoing business operations and may obscure analysis of trends and financial performance. The Cooperation Agreement expired in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Restructuring and employee severance costs are excluded because they are not part of the ongoing operations of our underlying business and include, but are not limited to, costs related to divestitures, closing and consolidating facilities, changing the way we manufacture or distribute our products, moving manufacturing of a product to another location, changes in production or business process outsourcing or insourcing, employee severance, and realigning operations. Amortization and other acquisition-related costs, which include transaction costs, integration costs, and changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations, are excluded because they are not part of the ongoing operations of our underlying business and to facilitate comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results and to our peer group companies' financial results. Additionally, costs for amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and amortization as a result of basis differences in equity method investments are non-cash amounts, which are variable in amount and frequency and are significantly impacted by the timing and size of acquisitions, so their exclusion facilitates comparison of historical, current, and forecasted financial results. We also exclude other acquisition-related costs, which are directly related to an acquisition but do not meet the criteria to be recognized on the acquired entity's initial balance sheet as part of the purchase price allocation. These costs are also significantly impacted by the timing, complexity, and size of acquisitions. Acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs are incurred in connection with contingent cash payments or the issuance of share-based payment awards, which include service requirements, as a part of certain physician practice acquisitions. These costs include fair value adjustments for liability-classified awards. These costs are excluded because they are unrelated to the underlying operating results of our business and to facilitate comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results and to our peer group companies' financial results. In addition, the magnitude of these expenses is significantly impacted by the timing and size of the acquisitions of physician practices. Impairments and gain or loss on disposal of assets, net are excluded because they do not occur in or reflect the ordinary course of our ongoing business operations and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount, and in the case of impairments, are non-cash amounts, so their exclusion facilitates comparison of historical, current, and forecasted financial results. Litigation recoveries or charges, net are excluded because they often relate to events that may have occurred in prior or multiple periods, do not occur in or reflect the ordinary course of our business, and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount. Impairment of equity interest in Outcomes was incurred in connection with the observed reduction in the estimated fair value of the Outcomes business, of which we hold a 16 percent equity interest. We exclude this impairment from non-GAAP results as impairments of unconsolidated equity investments of this magnitude do not occur in the normal course of our ongoing business operations. This impairment is similar in nature to a gain or loss on the divestiture of a majority interest, which we also exclude from non-GAAP results, including the gain recognized on our initial divestiture of the Outcomes business in fiscal 2024. The exclusion of this impairment from non-GAAP financial measures facilitates comparison of our current financial results to our historical financial results. The tax effect for each of the items listed above is determined using the tax rate and other tax attributes applicable to the item and the jurisdiction(s) in which the item is recorded. The gross, tax, and net impact of each item are presented with our GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations.
Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow: We provide this non-GAAP financial measure as a supplemental metric to assist readers in assessing the effects of items and events on our cash flow on a year-over-year basis and in comparing our performance to that of our peer group companies. In calculating this non-GAAP metric, certain items are excluded from net cash provided by operating activities because they relate to significant and unusual or non-recurring events and are inherently unpredictable in timing and amount. We believe adjusted free cash flow is important to management and useful to investors as a supplemental measure as it indicates the cash flow available for working capital needs, debt repayments, dividend payments, share repurchases, strategic acquisitions, or other strategic uses of cash. A reconciliation of our GAAP financial results to Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow is provided in Schedule 6 of the financial statement tables included with this release.
Forward Looking Non-GAAP Measures
In this document, the Company presents certain forward-looking non-GAAP metrics. The Company does not provide outlook on a GAAP basis because the items that the Company excludes from GAAP to calculate the comparable non-GAAP measure can be dependent on future events that are less capable of being controlled or reliably predicted by management and are not part of the Company's routine operating activities. Additionally, management does not forecast many of the excluded items for internal use and therefore cannot create or rely on outlook done on a GAAP basis.
The occurrence, timing and amount of any of the items excluded from GAAP to calculate non-GAAP could significantly impact the Company's fiscal 2026 GAAP results. Over the past five fiscal years, the excluded items have impacted the Company's EPS from $1.79 to $8.44, which includes a $6.97 change related to the goodwill impairment we recognized in fiscal 2022.
Definitions
Growth rate calculation: growth rates in this report are determined by dividing the difference between current-period results and prior-period results by prior-period results.
Interest and Other, net: other (income)/expense, net plus interest expense, net.
Segment Profit: segment revenue minus (segment cost of products sold and segment distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses).
Segment Profit margin: segment profit divided by segment revenue.
Non-GAAP distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses or Non-GAAP SG&A: distribution, selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years and shareholder cooperation agreement costs.
Non-GAAP operating earnings: operating earnings excluding (1) LIFO charges/(credits), (2) state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, (3) shareholder cooperation agreement costs, (4) restructuring and employee severance, (5) amortization and other acquisition-related costs, (6) acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs, (7) impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net, and (8) litigation (recoveries)/charges, net.
Non-GAAP earnings before income taxes: earnings before income taxes excluding (1) LIFO charges/(credits), (2) state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, (3) shareholder cooperation agreement costs, (4) restructuring and employee severance, (5) amortization and other acquisition-related costs, (6) acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs, (7) impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net, (8) litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and (9) impairment of equity interest in Outcomes.
Non-GAAP net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests: net earnings attributable to non-controlling interests excluding (1) LIFO charges/(credits), (2) state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, (3) shareholder cooperation agreement costs, (4) restructuring and employee severance, (5) amortization and other acquisition-related costs, (6) acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs, (7) impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net, (8) litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and (9) impairment of equity interest in Outcomes, each net of tax.
Non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.: net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. excluding (1) LIFO charges/(credits), (2) state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, (3) shareholder cooperation agreement costs, (4) restructuring and employee severance, (5) amortization and other acquisition-related costs, (6) acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs, (7) impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net, (8) litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and (9) impairment of equity interest in Outcomes, each net of tax.
Non-GAAP effective tax rate: provision for income taxes adjusted for the tax impacts of (1) LIFO charges/(credits), (2) state opioid assessment related to prior fiscal years, (3) shareholder cooperation agreement costs, (4) restructuring and employee severance, (5) amortization and other acquisition-related costs, (6) acquisition-related cash and share-based compensation costs, (7) impairments and (gain)/loss on disposal of assets, net, (8) litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, and (9) impairment of equity interest in Outcomes, divided by (earnings before income taxes adjusted for the items above).
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc.: non-GAAP net earnings attributable to Cardinal Health, Inc. divided by diluted weighted-average shares outstanding.
Non-GAAP adjusted free cash flow: net cash provided by operating activities plus repurchases of liability-classified Specialty Alliance Units, less payments related to additions to property and equipment, excluding settlement payments and receipts related to matters included in litigation (recoveries)/charges, net, as defined above, or other significant and unusual or non-recurring cash payments or receipts.
Robinhood má už 13 samostatných byznysových linií s anualizovanými tržbami nad 100 milionů USD, což snižuje závislost na kryptu. Ve 2. čtvrtletí tržby vzrostly o 32 % na rekordních 1,3 miliardy USD.
Robinhood Markets (HOOD +1.32%) stock has fallen about 12% over the past year, even as the company continues to grow revenue and earnings at high rates.
The second-quarter earnings results revealed one important signal for investors: Robinhood is moving away from its dependency on crypto-based trading toward a more diversified financial services platform. The implications could be significant for patient shareholders.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Robinhood is not dependent on crypto trading Revenue grew 32% year over year in the quarter, reaching a record $1.3 billion. It also posted a 48% year-over-year increase in earnings, with a healthy adjusted operating profit margin of 57%. Management is investing efficiently in new products, as evidenced by robust earnings growth despite a 33% year-over-year increase in operating expenses.
Robinhood has long been seen as a trading app, and volatility in financial markets can negatively impact transaction-based revenue. Crypto trading volume fell 38% year over year to $100 million in the quarter, reflecting the recent decline in top cryptocurrencies.
Despite lower crypto volume, Robinhood's transaction-based revenue still rose 44%, driven by increases in equities, options, and event contracts. Notably, other revenues grew 54% year over year to $143 million, driven by Trump Account service revenue and a 17% increase in Robinhood Gold subscribers, which hit a record 4.84 million.
Today's Change
(
1.32
%) $
1.23
Current Price
$
94.52
What does diversifying revenue mean for the stock? Management disclosed there are now 13 separate business lines generating at least $100 million in annualized revenue. This is up from 11 in the fourth quarter of 2025, with recent additions including the Robinhood Legend trading application and the credit card business.
Expanding beyond trading products has been Robinhood's goal all along. Roughly $84 trillion in wealth is expected to be transferred to heirs over the next 20 years, according to Cerruli Associates. Robinhood is expanding to new products to become a full-service money management business to capture its share of that opportunity. The business rationale is simple: The more assets on the platform, the more revenue it can earn over the long term.
Net deposits grew 28% year over year to $22 billion, with total platform assets reaching $369 billion. Banking deposits have already exceeded $3 billion since the service's initial rollout in the second half of 2025. Retirement assets also grew 82% year over year to over $34 billion in the quarter. These are customers who are clearly not just interested in trading crypto but in making Robinhood the permanent base for their savings.
Robinhood has been labeled a high-growth trading platform, and the success of its new event contracts business fuels that narrative. But the steady growth in deposits, banking, and retirement assets shows Robinhood is more than just a trading app.
Much of the company's recent expansion is reflected in the stock price, which trades at an expensive 38 times forward earnings estimates, indicating high growth expectations. But the momentum it is seeing as it expands its revenue streams seems to at least justify that premium valuation.
Stellar and the XRP Ledger, two prominent blockchain networks with intertwined histories, have taken a significant step toward interoperability through a new initiative introduced by Xora Finance. With this move, native XLM can now be settled directly on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), signaling the possibility of closer collaboration between these networks after years of developing separately.
Xora Finance bridges Stellar and XRPLXora Finance, a neobank operating within the XRP ecosystem, has enabled the settlement of Stellar’s XLM token on the XRPL. This development allows holders of XLM to transact and settle their assets within the XRPL environment, offering greater flexibility and access to XRPL-based liquidity and financial applications.
Stellar and XRP Ledger were initially conceived to provide faster, more user-friendly financial infrastructure in the blockchain sector. Despite their shared beginnings, the networks split in 2014 and have since evolved distinctly in terms of technology, native assets, and communities. The integration by Xora Finance seeks to reconnect these two ecosystems, potentially paving the way for further technical collaborations.
For XLM holders, this opens up opportunities beyond merely expanding the range of blockchains where XLM can be used. The ability to settle native XLM through XRPL introduces new settlement options and could enhance the asset’s interaction with applications operating on the XRPL.
Implications for blockchain interoperabilityTraditionally, blockchains have behaved as isolated ecosystems, with moving assets between chains often requiring complex bridges, wrapped tokens, or added infrastructure. Direct connections between major networks represent a shift toward reducing these boundaries and enabling seamless asset transfers across platforms.
The collaboration is notable given the shared background of Stellar and XRPL, both of which originated from early efforts to create next-generation financial infrastructure on the blockchain. The renewed connection, facilitated by Xora Finance, highlights a potential convergence between what were historically competing platforms.
If Xora Finance continues to expand this functionality, XLM users could benefit from simplified access to XRPL’s settlement features. This could also set an example of how previously isolated networks can leverage each other’s strengths for mutual benefit.
As direct links like XLM settlement on XRPL become possible, the industry may move beyond isolated platforms and toward a more integrated blockchain financial environment.
The latest development suggests that the future of blockchain may be less about competition among networks and more about creating a seamless user experience across interoperable technologies.
While enabling XLM settlement on XRPL may appear incremental, it indicates a growing trend toward collaboration and technical compatibility within the crypto sector.
Mini dictionary: Xora Finance, a digital neobank focusing on the XRP Ledger ecosystem, provides financial services designed for blockchain-based transactions and is actively engaged in blockchain interoperability solutions.
NetworkNative TokenYear LaunchedNow Interoperable WithStellarXLM2014XRP LedgerXRP LedgerXRP2012Stellar (via Xora Finance)Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Payments platform Decta has integrated USDC into its internal treasury operations to settle company funds internationally through OpenPayd, without adding stablecoins to its customer-facing payment services.
Summary
Decta will use USDC to settle its own funds internationally through OpenPayd’s infrastructure. OpenPayd will convert Decta’s company funds into USDC through its OTC services for operational settlements. The integration is limited to Decta’s treasury operations and will not introduce stablecoins into customer-facing payment flows. Decta previously explored issuing a euro-pegged stablecoin under MiCA with France-based Next Generation. Decta said Tuesday that company funds will be transferred into OpenPayd’s regulated infrastructure, where they can be converted into Circle’s USDC through the financial infrastructure provider’s over-the-counter services before being used for international operational settlements.
The arrangement is limited to Decta’s own money rather than funds handled for merchants or other clients, keeping the stablecoin component behind the company’s existing payments business.
Lux Thiagarajah, chief commercial officer at OpenPayd, told crypto media that the integration represents a proprietary treasury use case and does not introduce USDC into Decta’s customer payment flows.
Using this setup, Decta can move its own funds between international entities, convert fiat into USDC when required and use the stablecoin for settlement through OpenPayd’s infrastructure. The company said the arrangement will support liquidity management while simplifying transfers across its operations.
Decta uses USDC for internal treasury settlements Decta CEO Scott Dawson said the company is using technology to make its financial operations faster, simpler and more resilient while retaining its existing controls and regulatory requirements.
Rather than allowing customers to pay merchants in stablecoins, Decta is using USDC as an operational settlement asset between parts of its business. Thiagarajah said OpenPayd handles the conversion through its OTC capabilities after Decta transfers its funds into the provider’s regulated infrastructure.
The distinction separates the arrangement from consumer-facing stablecoin payment products because Decta’s clients do not directly interact with USDC as part of the transaction process.
Decta, founded in London in 2015, provides payment processing, acquiring, card issuance, banking infrastructure and related services to businesses. According to the company’s announcement, it operates across 32 countries and serves hundreds of companies.
Its website describes the group as an end-to-end payments infrastructure provider covering acquiring, issuing and processing, with services including payment acquiring, BIN sponsorship, white-label card issuing, issuer and acquirer processing and digital banking infrastructure.
The USDC arrangement adds a blockchain-based settlement rail to Decta’s internal financial operations without requiring the company to change the payment products offered to its customers.
OpenPayd brings regulated USDC conversion into the process OpenPayd’s role in the arrangement follows the company’s expansion of its regulated digital asset services in Europe.
In June 2026, OpenPayd received MiCA authorization, which allows the London-founded financial infrastructure provider to offer regulated crypto services across the European Economic Area under a single authorization.
The approval covers fiat-to-stablecoin conversions, custody, wallet infrastructure and stablecoin transfers across supported blockchain networks, according to OpenPayd. The company secured the authorization shortly before the European Union’s MiCA transition period ended on July 1.
OpenPayd was founded in London in 2018 and connects traditional fiat payment infrastructure with digital assets. Its client base includes Kraken, eToro, OKX and institutional crypto liquidity provider B2C2, according to the Decta announcement.
Its USDC infrastructure was developed before the MiCA approval. Back in 2025, OpenPayd partnered with Circle to allow clients to convert between fiat currencies and USDC while managing both forms of money through the company’s financial infrastructure.
At the time, the companies said the integration was designed for uses including payments, treasury management and digital asset services. OpenPayd said it processed more than €130 billion annually when the partnership was announced.
The company has since built stablecoin functions that allow businesses to receive, hold, convert and send digital dollars alongside fiat balances. OpenPayd said in February that its infrastructure could also be embedded into existing treasury and payment workflows while supporting cross-border settlement.
Stablecoins are entering corporate treasury workflows Decta is not the only company testing stablecoins primarily as a treasury tool rather than as a consumer payment method.
In July, Hyundai Motor’s U.S. and Mexican operations completed a $20,000 cross-border treasury transfer using USDT on Avalanche, with the transaction settling in about seven minutes, as previously covered by crypto.news.
Tether said Hyundai Motor America converted dollars into USDT and transferred the tokens to Hyundai Motor Mexico, where the stablecoin was converted back into dollars. Hyundai Card designed the remittance structure while Axiym supplied settlement infrastructure, and the companies kept their existing compliance, accounting and treasury controls in place during the test.
The Hyundai pilot also followed a separate integration between Circle and treasury software provider Kyriba. According to the companies, Kyriba’s corporate clients can manage USDC balances alongside cash positions and use the stablecoin for eligible cross-border and intercompany transactions while retaining existing treasury approval procedures.
Business use of stablecoins has also extended into liquidity management. Bitso Business said in July that stablecoin transaction volume on its platform had increased 81% year over year during the first half of 2026, attributing the increase to demand for real-time settlement, treasury management and cross-border liquidity services. More than 60% of its newly onboarded business clients during the period were financial institutions, including banks and licensed payment providers, the company said.
Decta’s implementation differs from some of those pilots because the company is integrating USDC into an active internal treasury process through an external regulated infrastructure provider rather than announcing a customer stablecoin product.
Decta has previously explored a MiCA stablecoin The treasury integration follows Decta’s earlier work involving regulated stablecoins in Europe.
In August 2024, Decta Limited and France-based Next Generation said they were exploring the issuance of a euro-pegged stablecoin under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, subject to receiving the necessary regulatory approval.
MiCA introduced specific requirements for stablecoin issuers and crypto service providers across the European Union, while authorization in one member state can allow eligible firms to passport their services across the bloc. The regulatory transition for crypto-asset service providers ended on July 1, 2026.
USDC has remained available within the regulated European market because Circle obtained the required authorization for the stablecoin, while several platforms restricted non-compliant assets as the MiCA transition ended.
For its latest implementation, however, Decta is not issuing a stablecoin or offering one to customers. Its funds are instead sent to OpenPayd, converted into USDC through OpenPayd’s OTC infrastructure and used for Decta’s own international operational settlements before the company continues managing its customer payment services separately.
Essential Utilities ve 2Q 2026 vykázala GAAP EPS 0,37 USD, meziročně mírně pod 0,38 USD, a upravený EPS 0,38 USD na akcii. Společnost zároveň potvrdila cíl růstu EPS o 5 % až 7 % ročně.
Essential Utilities (NYSE:WTRG) reported second-quarter 2026 GAAP earnings of $0.37 per share, compared with $0.38 per share in the prior-year quarter, as higher regulatory recoveries and water volumes were offset by lower gas volumes, increased operating expenses, depreciation and interest costs.
Excluding approximately $0.01 per share of merger-related expenses, the company reported adjusted non-GAAP earnings of $0.38 per share. Chairman and CEO Chris Franklin said Essential remains confident it can achieve its target of 5% to 7% annual earnings-per-share growth, using 2024 adjusted earnings of $1.97 per share as the baseline.
Quarterly Earnings Drivers Chief Financial Officer Dan Schuller said earnings benefited from a $0.06-per-share increase in regulatory recoveries and surcharges, a $0.02 increase from higher water volumes, and a $0.01 benefit from water customer growth. The customer growth reflected both acquisitions and organic expansion, he said.
Those gains were partly offset by $0.02 per share of higher operating expenses, a $0.02 impact from lower gas volumes, and $0.06 of other costs. The latter category included $0.03 from increased depreciation and $0.03 from higher interest expense and lower allowance for funds used during construction, or AFUDC.
Operating and maintenance expenses rose about $5.1 million, or 3.5%, from a year earlier. Schuller attributed the increase primarily to higher employee-related costs, including merit increases and medical claims, along with greater water and wastewater production costs and expenses associated with newly acquired customers.
The increase was partly offset by lower insurance expense due largely to an insurance recovery, reduced gas-segment bad debt expense, and lower customer-assistance surcharge costs. Excluding merger-related costs, operating and maintenance expenses increased 2.6%, which Schuller said was in line with the company’s historical norms.
American Water Merger Advances Franklin said Essential has received regulatory approvals for its planned merger with American Water in Kentucky, Ohio and Virginia. The company continues to expect the transaction to close during the first quarter of 2027.
Proceedings are continuing in the remaining jurisdictions. Essential has reached a settlement in principle in Texas, while public input hearings in New Jersey are scheduled for August. Testimony was filed in North Carolina at the end of the prior week, and the Illinois matter is before an administrative law judge with a statutory process scheduled to conclude by November.
In Pennsylvania, the companies remain in negotiations with parties while evidentiary hearings are underway. Franklin said the administrative law judge’s timing in issuing a recommendation could affect the closing schedule, but he characterized the current first-quarter 2027 expectation as “comfortable” based on known timelines.
“Things have gone largely according to plan,” Franklin said, while noting that regulatory approvals involve negotiations with different stakeholders across multiple states.
Essential is also conducting integration planning with American Water. Franklin said employee collaboration between the companies has exceeded his expectations and that the combined organization is intended to begin operating as a “world-class organization” immediately following closing.
Infrastructure Spending and Regulatory Pipeline Essential invested $662 million in regulated water and natural gas infrastructure during the first half of 2026 and remains on track to spend a record $1.7 billion for the full year. Franklin said the investments are intended to improve service, reliability, safety and regulatory compliance.
The company finalized rate cases or surcharges representing $56.6 million in annualized revenue during 2026 through the second quarter, with about 78% coming from water and wastewater operations. Its water and wastewater segment has five rate cases and one surcharge proceeding pending, representing roughly $79.7 million in requested annualized increases.
Essential’s Pennsylvania natural gas subsidiary has a base rate case pending that seeks $163.2 million in additional annual revenue. The company plans to file its next Aqua Pennsylvania water rate case around year-end.
Franklin said Essential delayed the Aqua Pennsylvania filing amid several ongoing regulatory matters, including the merger proceeding and the Peoples Natural Gas rate case. He described the anticipated water filing as largely driven by capital investment and said the company expects to follow its usual process while considering positions raised by Pennsylvania’s Governor’s Office on energy affordability.
Schuller said approximately 55% of Essential’s Pennsylvania capital spending for 2026 is eligible for recovery through the distribution system improvement charge, or DSIC. Franklin said the company will continue advocating to expand the DSIC mechanism to cover additional capital items.
Acquisitions, Dividend and Outlook Essential completed the acquisition of Integra Water LLC for $4.9 million, adding approximately 1,100 customers in Texas. The company also has signed agreements to acquire small systems in Pennsylvania, Texas, North Carolina, Virginia and New Jersey.
Including those signed agreements, Essential expects to add about 200,000 customers for a combined purchase price of approximately $282 million. That figure includes the DELCORA transaction, whose progress remains stalled by a federal bankruptcy court stay related to the City of Chester’s bankruptcy.
Franklin said the DELCORA agreement remains fully enforceable and assumable by American Water, and Essential does not expect the proposed merger to negatively affect its pursuit of the transaction. The company’s potential municipal water and wastewater acquisition pipeline stands at approximately 400,000 customers.
Separately, Essential’s board approved a 5.25% increase in its quarterly cash dividend. The dividend is payable Sept. 1, 2026, to shareholders of record as of Aug. 11, 2026.
Looking ahead, Schuller said Essential expects its effective tax rate to remain in the low single digits for the full year, generally below 5%. He also said a previously disclosed one-time item remains expected later in 2026 and should benefit earnings. The company has experienced higher fuel costs across its fleet and equipment base amid developments in the Middle East, which Schuller said have been incorporated into current results.
About Essential Utilities (NYSE:WTRG) Essential Utilities, Inc, formerly known as Aqua America, is a publicly traded water and natural gas utility holding company. Through its regulated water and wastewater subsidiaries, the company provides essential water services to residential, commercial and industrial customers. In addition, Essential Utilities delivers natural gas distribution services in Pennsylvania through its Peoples Gas subsidiary, offering integrated utility solutions under a unified corporate framework.
The company traces its roots to the Philadelphia Suburban Water Company, founded in 1886 to serve growing communities outside Philadelphia.
Goldman Sachs Asset Management vidí další vítěze AI v optických a vláknových firmách, protože úzké hrdlo se přesouvá z čipů na propojení datových center. Zmiňuje Lumentum a Coherent.
Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s Sung Cho, co-head of public technology investing, argues the AI trade is rotating away from the graphics processor cycle toward companies wiring AI together, specifically optical and fiber equipment makers. His picks: Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE | LITE Price Prediction) and Coherent (NYSE:COHR).
Cho’s case starts with a shift in workload mix. “One of the most important trends that we’re seeing in the market today is the shift from AI training, driving most of the compute, to AI inference, driving most of the compute,” he said. “Underneath that architecture is a completely different set of architecture, a completely different set of chips, optical equipment. And so the leadership is going to evolve and change as this transition happens.”
Why Connectivity Is the New Constraint The physical footprint changes with inference. “As you go into inference, you need a lot more data centers that are closer to the customers that they’re serving. As a result, we’re just going to have to connect a lot of data centers,” Cho said. Inside those buildings, the wiring becomes the ceiling. “What’s happening is that compute speeds, the processor speeds are no longer the bottleneck. What the bottleneck is, is actually the ability to be able to have chip to chip communication, server to server communication. And right now, a lot of those connections are happening via copper. And that’s going to be replaced by optical as well,” he added.
The supply-side setup gives the trade duration. “One of the unique aspects of optical is that it’s extremely hard to bring new capacity online. And so the demand for optical and fiber is moving at an accelerating rate as a result of this transition. But the ability for the industry to bring capacity online is going to be somewhat limited and keep that duration of that trade,” Cho said. A semiconductor ETF is up 80% year to date but down 20% from its 52-week highs, while memory stocks tripled over the last couple of years despite similar bottleneck labels.
Lumentum: Margin Expansion Backing the Story Lumentum’s fiscal Q3 2026 report, filed May 5, 2026, validated the thesis. Revenue reached $808.4 million, up 90.1% year over year, with non-GAAP EPS of $2.37 and non-GAAP operating margin expanding 700 basis points sequentially to 32.2%. CEO Michael Hurlston flagged optical circuit switches with backlog above $400 million and co-packaged optics with an incremental multi-hundred-million-dollar order deliverable in first half calendar 2027 booked. Details are in the company’s 8-K filing. Shares closed at $813.51 on August 10, up 120.71% year to date and 599.67% over one year.
Coherent: Scaling Capacity to Meet AI Demand Coherent, now an S&P 500 constituent, posted Q3 FY2026 revenue of $1.81 billion, up 20.5% year over year, with Datacenter & Communications contributing $1.36 billion, up 40.6% YoY and now 75% of total revenue. Non-GAAP EPS was $1.41, with non-GAAP operating margin at 20.3%. CEO Jim Anderson said Coherent is on track to double internal InP output by year-end 2026 and more than double again by 2027. NVIDIA’s $2 billion investment anchors a partnership around laser and optical networking gear, with new engines such as CPO/NPO, optical circuit switches, and multi-rail solutions adding $20+ billion in incremental serviceable addressable market by calendar 2030. Shares finished at $325.15, up 76.17% year to date.
What to Watch Next Sell-side positioning tracks Cho’s thesis. Lumentum carries 5 strong buy and 16 buy ratings with an analyst target of $1,125.93, while Coherent shows 4 strong buys and 13 buys against a $394.62 target. Reddit sentiment for LITE swung to very bullish score of 82 on August 4. Monitor InP capacity ramps, CPO order flow into calendar 2027, and whether hyperscaler capex holds through the inference build-out Cho describes.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
KuCoin přidal tokenizované akcie Ondo do KuCoin Alpha a zpřístupnil tak vybraným uživatelům tokenizované akcie i ETF přes běžné rozhraní burzy. Mezi prvními jsou SPYon, NVDAon, MUon, SNDKon a CRCLon.
, /PRNewswire/ -- KuCoin, a leading global crypto platform built on trust, today announced the integration of Ondo tokenized assets, marketed as "Ondo tokenized stocks," into KuCoin Alpha. The integration provides eligible users across the KuCoin ecosystem with a streamlined way to access tokenized stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) through the familiar KuCoin interface.
Through KuCoin Alpha, users can access supported Ondo tokenized stocks using funds held in their KuCoin accounts and trade them without navigating separate wallets or external onchain applications. By simplifying the user journey, the integration creates a more intuitive entry point to TradFi-linked onchain products while retaining the efficiency and flexibility enabled by blockchain-based infrastructure. The initial selection spans broad-market ETFs and leading companies across technology, semiconductors and digital finance, including widely followed products such as SPYon, NVDAon, MUon, SNDKon, and CRCLon.
The launch builds on the earlier integration of Ondo tokenized stocks into KuCoin Web3 Wallet. Together, the two integrations provide complementary pathways across the KuCoin ecosystem: an exchange-app experience through KuCoin Alpha and a self-custodial experience through KuCoin Web3 Wallet. This gives users greater flexibility in how they discover, access, and manage TradFi-linked onchain assets.
The expansion reflects the next stage in the development of onchain finance. Following the global adoption of stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets are emerging as another important asset category supported by blockchain infrastructure. Scaling this market will require more than asset issuance alone. It will also depend on trusted access infrastructure that connects products, liquidity and users through intuitive and widely accessible interfaces.
As traditional financial products increasingly move onchain, crypto platforms are evolving beyond venues for individual asset listings to become an important infrastructure for global onchain markets. By extending Ondo stocks across both its exchange-app and self-custodial environments, KuCoin is building a unified access layer for crypto-native assets, tokenized real-world assets and other TradFi-linked onchain products.
The integration marks another step in KuCoin's strategy to build trusted infrastructure that connects traditional finance with the expanding onchain economy while making emerging financial products accessible through experiences users already understand.
About KuCoin
Founded in 2017, KuCoin is a leading global crypto platform built on trust and security, serving over 45 million users across 200+ countries and regions. Known for its reliability and user-first approach, the platform combines advanced technology, deep liquidity, and strong security safeguards to deliver a seamless trading experience. KuCoin provides access to 1,500+ digital assets through a broad product suite and remains committed to building transparent, compliant, and user-centric digital asset infrastructure for the future of finance, backed by SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and ISO/IEC 27701:2019 Certifications. In recent years, we have built a strong global compliance foundation, marked by key milestones including AUSTRAC registration in Australia, a MiCA license in Europe, and regulatory progress in other markets.
Learn more at www.kucoin.com.
Disclaimer
The information is for corporate PR purposes only and does not constitute endorsement or investment advice.
Na síti Ravencoin byla zneužita kritická konsenzuální chyba, která umožnila přijetí neplatných bloků. Hrozí i přeuspořádání zhruba tří dnů historie transakcí, pokud převládne alternativní řetězec.
Ravencoin ağında kritik bir konsensüs açığının istismar edildiği açıklandı. Geçersiz blokların kabul edilmesine yol açan güvenlik sorunu sonrası 2Miners ve RavenMiner farklı bir zincir üzerinde madencilik yaparken, baskın zincirin değişmesi halinde yaklaşık üç günlük işlemin yeniden düzenlenmesi riski bulunuyor.
Ravencoin’in resmi açıklamasına göre ağdaki ilk bilinen geçersiz blok, 7 Ağustos’ta 4.487.776 blok yüksekliğinde ortaya çıktı. Güvenlik açığı, savunmasız düğümlerin normalde kabul etmemesi gereken blokları geçerli olarak işlemesine neden oldu.
Sorunun ardından ağdaki bazı madencilik havuzları farklı bir zincir üzerinde çalışmaya başladı. Bu gelişme, Ravencoin’in mevcut zincir yapısının yeniden düzenlenmesi ihtimalini gündeme getirdi.
Ravencoin Ağındaki Açık Ne Anlama Geliyor? Buradaki konsensüs açığı, blockchain ağındaki bilgisayarların hangi blokların geçerli olduğu konusunda aynı kuralları uygulamasını etkileyen bir güvenlik sorunu anlamına geliyor.
Ravencoin açıklamasına göre açık istismar edildikten sonra bazı düğümler geçersiz blokları kabul etti. İlk bilinen geçersiz blok da 4.487.776 numaralı blok oldu.
Blockchain’de her blok bir önceki bloğa bağlandığı için böyle bir hata yalnızca tek bir işlemi değil, zincirin devamındaki işlemlerin geçerliliğini de etkileyebilir.
Ravencoin Network Notice
A critical consensus vulnerability has been demonstrated and exploited on the Ravencoin network.
The issue caused invalid blocks to be accepted by vulnerable nodes. The first known invalid block appeared at height 4,487,776 on 2026-08-07 15:44:01 UTC.…
Ravencoin’de 3 Günlük Reorg Riski Neden Oluştu? Sorunun ardından 2Miners ve RavenMiner, istismar edilen zinciri dışarıda bırakan farklı bir zinciri kazdıklarını duyurdu.
Burada devreye reorg, yani blockchain yeniden organizasyonu giriyor. Reorg, ağdaki madencilerin veya doğrulayıcıların farklı bir zinciri baskın hale getirmesiyle mevcut zincirin bir bölümünün değiştirilmesi anlamına geliyor.
Eğer 2Miners ve RavenMiner’ın oluşturduğu zincir ağda baskın hale gelirse, Ravencoin’de yaklaşık üç günlük zincir geçmişinin yeniden düzenlenmesi gerekebilir.
Bu durumda bazı işlemler eski zincirde kalabilir ve yeniden geçerli hale gelmeleri garanti olmayabilir.
Borsalara RVN İçin Kritik Uyarı Ravencoin ekibi, ağ durumu kesinleşene kadar borsalara RVN yatırma ve çekme işlemlerini geçici olarak durdurmalarını tavsiye etti.
Açıklamaya göre 4.487.775 numaralı bloktan sonra onaylanan işlemler riskli kabul edilmeli. Bazı işlemler yeniden işlem havuzuna dönebilir ve tekrar madencilik yapılabilir, ancak bunun gerçekleşeceği garanti edilmiyor.
Bu nedenle borsaların geri alınmış yatırma veya çekme işlemlerinin otomatik olarak yeniden ortaya çıkacağını ya da tekrar onaylanacağını varsaymaması gerekiyor.
Ravencoin Kullanıcıları Şimdilik Ne Yapmalı? Ravencoin’in açıklaması, ağ tamamen istikrara kavuşana kadar kullanıcıların yeni onayları kesin kabul etmemesi gerektiğine işaret ediyor.
Özellikle RVN yatırma ve çekme işlemlerinde yaşanabilecek zincir değişiklikleri nedeniyle mevcut onayların daha sonra geçersiz hale gelme ihtimali bulunuyor.
Şimdilik asıl belirleyici gelişme, hangi zincirin ağda baskın hale geleceği olacak.
Ravencoin’deki güvenlik açığının etkisi de bu sürecin sonucuna bağlı. Eğer yeni zincir baskın hale gelirse yaklaşık üç günlük bir reorg yaşanabilir; mevcut zincir korunursa olası etkilerin kapsamı daha sınırlı kalabilir.
Kısacası Ravencoin ağında kritik bir güvenlik sorunu yaşanıyor ve 4.487.775 numaralı bloktan sonraki işlemler henüz tamamen güvenli kabul edilmiyor. Borsalar ve kullanıcılar için en önemli konu ise ağın hangi zincir üzerinde istikrar kazanacağı.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Energy Transfer zvýšila dividendu už 19 čtvrtletí po sobě a výnos akcie činí 6,7 %. Firma zároveň zvedla výhled upraveného EBITDA pro rok 2026 na 18,8 až 19,1 miliardy USD.
Recently, there's been a flurry of positive dividend activity in the midstream energy sector with both well-known and lesser-heralded pipeline firms boosting payouts.
Energy Transfer (ET +2.29%) is one of the guests at the midstream dividend increase party. Following a July distribution increase of nearly 1%, Energy Transfer's consecutive streak of boosted payouts now spans an impressive 19 quarters, or nearly five years for those keeping score at home. Typically, Energy Transfer delivers gentle upside nudges to its dividend, and investors love the consistency.
Energy Transfer continues raising its dividend and investors should expect that trend to continue. Image source: Getty Images.
Plus, those modest increases add up over time. The stock yields 6.7% and, by some estimates, if its current trajectory of dividend increases continues, the dividend could nearly double over the next decade. That'd be music to the ears of long-term investors. Fortunately, this pipeline stock has the fundamentals to keep good dividend times coming.
Stars aligning for dividend growth Not only did Energy Transfer announce a dividend increase in July, but it also followed that up with a second-quarter earnings report and updated 2026 guidance confirming the distribution is on solid ground and poised for long-term growth.
In the June quarter, Energy Transfer's distributable cash flow (DCF), one of the bedrocks of pipeline operators' dividends, climbed to $2.59 billion from $1.96 billion a year earlier. The midstream company's DCF could continue to improve in the current quarter and beyond, driven by the revised 2026 guidance. Energy Transfer told investors it now expects 2026 full-year adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) of $18.8 billion to $19.1 billion, up from a prior forecast of $18.2 billion to $18.6 billion.
Regardless of sector, if there's anything that investors should demand of dividend-paying companies, it's rising earnings and cash flow. Those are telltale signs that current dividend obligations can be met and that payouts can grow over the long term.
Today's Change
(
2.29
%) $
0.46
Current Price
$
20.59
Longer-ranging support for the distribution doesn't end there. Energy Transfer is a diverse midstream operator with exposure to natural gas liquids (NGLs) and oil transportation as well as midstream gathering. That diversity matters for multiple reasons. First, management sounded optimistic about improving finances across its various segments. Second, in just a year, NGL projects went from out of fashion to being in high demand, indicating that Energy Transfer's related investments could pay dividends (pun intended).
AI angles Investors seeking artificial intelligence (AI) "derivative" exposure while balancing low-yielding, growth-heavy portfolios with income-generating assets should look to the midstream sector, including Energy Transfer.
All those high-priced data centers need power, but it can take years for traditional utilities to obtain all the permits required to deliver grid power to data centers. Guess which companies are adept at transporting energy? Pipeline operators such as Energy Transfer.
On the company's second-quarter earnings conference call, co-CEO Thomas Long said customers are expressing interest in upping their commitments for Energy Transfer's services that deliver energy to data centers and nearby power facilities. He also mentioned "advanced negotiations" with customers in six states to provide additional natural gas volumes.
Imagine capturing steady dividends while participating in the AI trade. With Energy Transfer, that's a reality, not a dream.
Atlassian vzrostl od dubnového 52týdenního minima 56 USD o 166 % a CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes řekl, že firma plánuje zpětný odkup akcií za 250 milionů USD. Tržby ve 4. čtvrtletí stouply o 28 % na 1,77 miliardy USD.
Most software stocks have plummeted during the past 12 months, as investors worry artificial intelligence (AI) will deal a blow to the software-as-a-service (SaaS) business model. The concerns are twofold:
If AI reduces the global workforce, SaaS companies that charge their customers on a per-user basis will suffer a sharp reduction in their revenue. AI programming tools like OpenAI's Codex and Anthropic's Claude Code technically make it easy to build replica software tools, which could render legacy SaaS providers obsolete. But during the past two quarters, Atlassian (TEAM +1.88%) has blown those concerns out of the water, and its stock has rocketed higher by 166% from its April 52-week low of $56. In fact, the story is now so positive that Chief Executive Officer Mike Cannon-Brookes just said the company plans to buy $250 million worth of Atlassian shares on the open market. Here's why investors might want to follow that lead.
Image source: Getty Images.
AI is proving to be a huge tailwind for Atlassian Atlassian's flagship products include Jira, which helps technical and non-technical teams manage their projects, and Confluence, which can serve as a digital town square for any organization, where employees can share important information and discuss work. In 2024, the company launched an AI platform called Rovo, which enhances Jira and Confluence with a host of powerful new features.
Rovo is incredibly versatile. It can serve as a coding assistant to rapidly help software developers resolve tickets in Jira, and it also powers a holistic search function that can rapidly locate information from across the entire organization, even if it's stored outside of an Atlassian product. Tech giant Cisco says it built AI agents with Rovo to automate reporting workflows, which has made some processes a whopping 40 times faster.
AI works best when it has context, because it can draw conclusions faster while keeping token costs at a minimum. Organizations run so much internal data and so many workflows through Atlassian's ecosystem that it's the ideal place to extract the most value from AI. In fact, the company says AI agents grounded in the Atlassian ecosystem produce 44% more accurate answers while consuming 48% fewer tokens, or units of data.
Atlassian has a treasure trove of data from more than 350,000 enterprise customers, so it knows exactly how they work and what problems they need to solve. This gives Rovo a huge head start over generic AI assistants, which lack that important contextual information -- and it's showing up in Atlassian's financial results, because the annual recurring revenue (ARR) it earns from Rovo adopters is growing twice as fast as the ARR from non-Rovo customers.
Soaring revenue and profits Atlassian generated $1.77 billion in revenue during the fourth quarter, which blew away Wall Street's average forecast of $1.66 billion. It also represented year-over-year growth of 28%, quelling concern that AI would be a drag on the company's sales -- in fact, it appears the exact opposite is true.
Atlassian's revenue could increase even faster, but it's prioritizing its bottom line by carefully managing costs. Its total operating expenses increased by just 11.8% during the fourth quarter, and since revenue grew significantly faster, this resulted in a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) profit of $139.1 million. That was a big swing from the $23.9 million net loss in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted (non-GAAP) basis, which excludes one-off and noncash expenses like stock-based compensation, Atlassian generated a profit of $473.1 million in the fourth quarter, up by a whopping 83% from the year-ago period. It took the company's overall fiscal 2026 adjusted profit to $1.53 billion, up 56%.
The fact that Atlassian is growing quickly and profitably suggests investors were probably mistaken to assume the company would immediately succumb to the AI revolution.
Despite its recent gains, Atlassian stock is still attractively valued Although Atlassian stock is up 166% from its April low point (as of Aug. 10), it's still trading at a very attractive price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 5.9, which is a steep discount to its three-year average of 10.2.
That suggests Atlassian stock would have to climb by more than 70% to match its average P/S ratio, which certainly is possible if the company continues to execute at a high level.
Today's Change
(
1.88
%) $
2.80
Current Price
$
151.87
I want to end with this thought: Replicating software tools like Jira and Confluence might be easy with AI-assisted programming products like Claude Code, but that is only a small part of the challenge. It takes infrastructure, security, and constant technical support to deploy enterprise software successfully, which can be extremely expensive. The economics typically only work at scale, which is why I predict it will be more affordable for businesses to continue paying Atlassian for the complete package instead.
Then there is reputational risk. When businesses build their own software, they also have to accept full responsibility if they suffer a cyber breach that results in stolen data. This can be devastating to the trust they have built with their customers, which is another reason using third-party vendors like Atlassian makes a lot more sense.
Simply put, I expect Atlassian to thrive for the foreseeable future.
Komunita SushiSwap navrhla restrukturalizaci tokenomiky SUSHI a vytvoření strategické rezervy z týdenních nákupů SUSHI. Zbytek příjmů protokolu má jít na Sushi Ops.
The SushiSwap community has released a "SUSHI Token Economic Restructuring" proposal. Key measures outlined in the proposal include: building a strategic reserve via weekly SUSHI purchases; allocating remaining protocol revenue to Sushi Ops to support growth and operations; and transferring part of the protocol’s deployed liquidity to active trading markets on Robinhood Chain, starting with the ETH–USDG trading pair.
Relevant content
Whale 0x2d59 buys 50,000 $ETH ($93.6M) in 2 hours, stakes it after 40,000 $ETH purchase last week
Whale 0x2d59, who bought 40,000 $ETH ($76.66M) a week ago, bought another 50,000 $ETH ($93.6M) 2 hours ago and staked it.
21 minutes ago
Goldman Sachs expects July CPI to come in slightly lower than expected, though the rebound in oil prices will prevent markets from fully easing.
Goldman Sachs' economic team forecasts July's core CPI will rise 0.19% month-over-month, slightly below the market consensus of 0.2%, with a year-over-year growth rate of 2.47%—also lower than the consensus expectation of 2.5%. For nominal CPI, Goldman projects a mere 0.05% month-over-month increase, below the market forecast of 0.1%, mainly reflecting the impact of earlier energy price declines. However, inflation risks have not fully dissipated. The bank notes its core CPI forecast corresponds to a 0.26% month-over-month rise in July’s core PCE, with components like portfolio management likely driving a larger gain. Looking ahead to the coming months, Goldman expects core CPI monthly gains to hover around 0.2%, housing inflation will continue to cool, the contribution of tariff-related price hikes will fall, and the pressure from jet fuel prices that previously lifted airfares will ease. July’s U.S. CPI is set to release at 20:30 Beijing time on August 12, with markets awaiting the data to chart the next move for U.S. Treasury yields and tech stock rotation. Ahead of the release, the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield returned to near 4.70%, while oil prices climbed back above $87. Goldman warns that if oil market disruptions and price rises persist longer than expected, inflation risks will tilt to the upside.
21 minutes ago
SK Hynix will resume investment in its NAND flash memory production line in Dalian, China, with production capacity expected to increase by 50%.
According to South Korean media Maeil Economic Daily, Solidigm, the NAND flash subsidiary of SK Hynix, plans to resume construction of the second phase of its NAND flash production base in Dalian, China. Equipment installation is expected to begin in November this year, with formal production set to launch in the first half of next year. The Dalian Phase II project had been stalled for a long time due to factors including the sluggish NAND market, inventory adjustments, and U.S. restrictions on semiconductor equipment exports to China. Driven by the expansion of AI data centers, demand for enterprise-grade solid-state drives (eSSDs) has grown, prompting SK Hynix to resume investment to expand NAND production capacity. The current monthly production capacity of Dalian Phase I is approximately 100,000 wafers; upon completion of Phase II, an additional monthly capacity of around 50,000 wafers is expected, boosting overall production capacity by about 50%. SK Hynix plans to adopt a "dual-track production" strategy: manufacturing mature-process NAND at its Dalian facility, while concentrating high-end NAND production at its M17 plant in Cheongju, South Korea.
21 minutes ago
Alameda Wallet has earned approximately $2.83 million in profits from staking SOL over five years, pushing its holdings value to $15.27 million.
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a wallet linked to Alameda Research’s bankruptcy proceedings has un-staked 201,740 SOL after nearly five years of staking, with the holdings now valued at around $15.27 million. FTX and Alameda-related addresses have previously seen repeated SOL un-staking and transfer activities, and the market has been closely tracking their asset disposal progress. Data indicates the position initially held 164,380 SOL, earning approximately 37,360 SOL in staking rewards over the period. The position’s current value stands at roughly $2.83 million. Calculated based on the initial investment, the SOL stake was worth about $352,000, and its value has now surged to approximately $15.27 million.
21 minutes ago
Binance will add GLMR, ICX, MOVR, RARE, and SOPH to its monitoring tag list
According to official announcements, Binance will add "Monitoring Tags" to Moonbeam (GLMR), ICON (ICX), Moonriver (MOVR), SuperRare (RARE), and Sophon (SOPH) starting August 11, 2026. The exchange stated that tokens with these tags carry higher volatility and risk compared to other listed tokens, adding that it will closely monitor these projects and conduct regular reviews. Tagged tokens face the risk of failing to meet Binance’s listing standards and potentially being delisted in the future. Binance noted that factors including the project team’s level of commitment, quality of development activities, trading volume and liquidity, network and smart contract security, community communication, changes in token supply, and presence of any misconduct will serve as the basis for subsequent evaluations. This adjustment will not affect other services related to the aforementioned tokens.
21 minutes ago
WTI原油日内涨幅扩大至2.5%
According to Bitget's market data, WTI crude oil rose 2.5% intraday to hit $84.21 per barrel. Brent crude oil broke through the $90 per barrel threshold, with an intraday gain of 2.4%.
Solana (SOL) vzrostla téměř o 7 % z 72,49 USD na 77,36 USD a ukončila pětitýdenní pokles. Na síti se mezitím řeší návrhy SIMD-0550 a SIMD-0553, které mohou změnit tokenomiku.
Solana (SOL) staged a significant recovery, gaining nearly 7% from its August 7 low of $72.49 and peaking at $77.36 on August 10. This rally pushed SOL above the top of a descending channel that had capped its price since early July, highlighting renewed buying interest after weeks of decline.
Technical indicators signal momentum shiftOn the 4-hour chart, SOL reclaimed the $74.30 level before breaking above channel resistance close to $75. The breakout was marked by a notable rise in transaction volume and a positive bull-bear power reading of 1.23, indicating buyers have outpaced sellers in the short term.
The Supertrend indicator, a tool used by traders to identify support and resistance, flipped bullish and now offers dynamic support at $75.02. As long as SOL remains above this price, its shorter-term outlook stays positive.
Market analyst Dami-Defi drew attention to this technical breakout, stating that SOL had ended a five-week decline. Despite this improvement, SOL continues to trade well below its May local high near $97 and its January peak above $145.
Market observer Dami-Defi highlighted that SOL’s recent move ended a five-week downtrend, but the token remains far below its previous 2026 highs.
Governance proposals target tokenomicsTwo major governance initiatives are now under review on the Solana network, with potential implications for SOL’s supply and transaction dynamics. The first, referred to as SIMD-0550, proposes accelerating Solana’s annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%, hastening the path to its target long-term inflation level. The second, SIMD-0553, would introduce resource-weighted transaction fees, possibly raising daily SOL token burns from the current 650 tokens to between 7,500 and 9,000 tokens.
The validator voting period for these proposals runs until August 18, and their adoption could fundamentally alter Solana’s economic structure if approved by the network’s consensus participants.
Mini dictionary: SIMD-0550/SIMD-0553, Solana governance proposals focused on supply reduction and transaction fee adjustment, respectively, each requiring validator approval for implementation.
On the institutional front, BlackRock, one of the world’s largest asset managers, has developed a fund system that allows recording ownership across several public blockchains, including Solana. Additionally, Western Union’s USDPT stablecoin now operates on Solana, facilitated through Anchorage Digital Bank and available in 37 jurisdictions as of May.
Key price levels and market outlookShort squeeze areas have been identified between $78 and $80, where liquidation of aggressive short positions could fuel additional upside if current support holds. The next significant resistance zone lies in the $82 to $84 range, while immediate liquidation clusters are centered from $77.80 to $78.20.
Crypto strategist Michaël van de Poppe underscored the importance of the support zone, noting that SOL has established a higher low versus Bitcoin—often interpreted as a bullish signal—and expressed expectations for potential moves toward $100 to $120 if momentum continues to build.
According to Michaël van de Poppe, SOL is holding a key support level and may accelerate toward $120 if strength persists.
Technical analyst Rod points to Fibonacci extension targets at $176.02 and $210.34 for longer-term gains, should SOL sustain a breakout and consolidation above the $90 to $100 area.
LevelRecent HighsNext ResistancesPotential Targets$72.49August 7 low$77.80–$78.20$80, $82–$84, $90–$100, $176.02, $210.34$97May high––$145January high––The Awesome Oscillator on the daily time frame is currently negative but improving, suggesting that selling momentum has weakened. A daily close above the Ichimoku cloud, now near $76.93, would boost the case for an advance toward $80 to $84.
Looking ahead, Solana’s upcoming upgrade, known as Alpenglow, seeks to decrease transaction finality times from 12.8 seconds to between 100 and 150 milliseconds. This enhancement is scheduled for phased rollout from August through October.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Tencent Music Entertainment Group oznámila za 2. čtvrtletí výnosy 8,93 mld. RMB, meziročně o 5,8 % více. Čistý zisk připadá na akcionáře vzrostl na 2,47 mld. RMB.
, /PRNewswire/ -- Tencent Music Entertainment Group ("TME," or the "Company") (NYSE: TME and HKEX: 1698), the leading all-in-one music and audio entertainment platform in China, today announced its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026.
Second Quarter 2026 Financial Highlights
Total revenues were RMB8.93 billion (US$1.32 billion), representing a 5.8% year-over-year increase, primarily due to strong growth in revenues from music related services[1]. Revenues from music related services[1] were RMB7.61 billion (US$1.12 billion), representing 11.0% year-over-year growth, driven by solid growth in revenues from marketing and consumption services[2], such as offline performance related services, as well as revenues from membership services[3]. Revenues from membership services[3] were RMB4.79 billion (US$706 million), representing 8.1% year-over-year growth. On an IFRS basis: Net profit attributable to equity holders of the Company was RMB2.47 billion (US$364 million), compared with RMB2.41 billion in the same period of 2025. Diluted earnings per ADS was RMB1.57 (US$0.23), compared with RMB1.55 in the same period of 2025. On a non-IFRS basis: Adjusted EBITDA[4] was RMB3.25 billion (US$480 million), representing 5.2% year-over-year growth. Non-IFRS net profit attributable to equity holders of the Company[4] was RMB2.69 billion (US$396 million), representing 4.4% year-over-year growth. Non-IFRS diluted earnings per ADS was RMB1.70 (US$0.25), up from RMB1.66 in the same period of 2025. Total cash, cash equivalents, term deposits and short-term investments as of June 30, 2026 were RMB44.22 billion (US$6.52 billion). In the second quarter of 2026, the Company repurchased 43.5 million ADSs with cash for an aggregate consideration of approximately US$400.0 million. Mr. Cussion Pang, Executive Chairman of TME, commented, "Our second-quarter results reflect the continued strength of our content-and-platform strategy. Concerts, merchandise, and other IP-driven experiences drove another quarter of solid growth in our marketing and consumption services, underscoring our ability to unlock greater value from premium music IP. Our expansion into digital audio through the integration of Ximalaya broadened our reach and enriched our ecosystem. As the industry evolves, we continue to champion copyright protection, foster a healthy ecosystem, and safeguard the value of creative work."
Mr. Ross Liang, CEO of TME, continued, "Amid a rapidly evolving market, we remain steadfast in building an ecosystem where our users can discover, connect, and be inspired through music and audio experiences. Our focus on differentiated content and a vibrant community continues to deepen engagement with our core users, and SVIP membership continues to grow. The addition of Ximalaya is an exciting milestone that will allow us to deliver an even richer audio experience and serve our users more effectively. Together, we are shaping the future of music and audio entertainment and unlocking long-term growth."
Second Quarter 2026 Operational Highlights
Products & Services – Elevated the music experience through continuous product innovation, ecosystem integration, and thoughtful AI application, to expand user reach and deepen engagement.
Enhanced the user experience through a more seamless discovery-to-playback journey, introducing vertical swipe-based discovery, video feeds, and expanded freemium access to drive higher daily time spent per user. Expanded distribution and user acquisition through deeper integration with the broader Tencent ecosystem. We strengthened music content distribution through Weixin Video Accounts and improved click-through and conversion to our apps. We also collaborated with Weixin Pay to drive traffic to our lightweight apps, such as Bodian Music and Kugou Concept, which cater to users seeking a simpler music experience. Harnessed AI agents to make music discovery more intuitive and personalized. We recently integrated with Weixin XiaoWei, and are pleased that by tapping into Weixin's massive user base, more users can discover songs, generate playlists, stream music with easy commands and instantly share favorite tracks with friends. Within QQ Music and Kugou Music, our upgraded AI agents now act as personal DJs, creating personalized playlists in real time that match what users want to hear in the moment. IP-Centric Content Ecosystem – Deepened strategic partnerships, strengthened proprietary IP capabilities, and expanded presence in digital audio to reinforce long-term IP value.
Expanded strategic partnerships beyond traditional music licensing to unlock greater value. 1) Deepened our partnerships with Dream Music Group, securing first-release for its top artists while expanding into new areas of collaborations including content co-creation, physical offerings, and offline experiences. 2) To enrich how users experience music beyond audio, we partnered with Huace Film & TV, RUYI FILM, and Zhejiang Satellite TV to bring original soundtracks and popular music variety shows to our platform, creating a more immersive connection between music and visual entertainment. Advanced our proprietary content creation capabilities and deepened artist development efforts to support growth of IP-driven experiences. 1) Produced hit releases for leading artists and major IPs, including Zhou Shen's Blaze into Bloom, Liu Yuning's Borrow a Little Light from Ordinary Days, and the theme song for the hit animated film All Wishes Come True!. 2) Following rapper Zhou Yan's (GAI) successful EVOLUTION tour in Asia, we elevated his latest tour, REAL G, to stadium scale. We also supported renowned actor and singer Steven Zhang's first-ever arena tour, New Journey. 3) Made a strategic investment in THE BLACK LABEL to help artists deepen connection with Chinese audiences. The addition of Ximalaya strengthened our position as a leading music and audio ecosystem. Its extensive content library broadened our user reach and enriched our SVIP offering. Meanwhile, we have begun the backend integration journey, laying the foundation for operational efficiency gains over time. Holistic IP Value Creation – Extended the value of premium IPs beyond streaming through digital and physical experiences, deepening fan engagement and driving diversified growth.
Continued to enhance our SVIP offering with differentiated IP-driven benefits, driving growth in user scale, engagement, and consumption of premium ancillary experiences. New benefits, including digital albums and tailored gift packages for artists and groups such as RENJUN, Lay Zhang, aespa, and RIIZE[5], deepened fan engagement. Expanded music IP into more immersive offline experiences, contributing to strong growth in concert-related revenue. 1) Hosted three fan meetings in Macau, China for SM Entertainment's trainee group, SMTR25, attracting tens of thousands of attendees and generating strong merchandise sales. 2) Building on last year's success, we scaled up our proprietary international IP event, TIMA, expanding to a much larger venue to welcome more fans amid growing enthusiasm. Extended the value of music IP through end-to-end IP merchandise development and distribution. Physical releases from KUN, Chen Chusheng, Eazin Poe, and Zhou Shen were met with strong demand, highlighting fans' growing appetite for premium music collectibles. Second Quarter 2026 Financial Review
Total revenues increased by RMB491 million, or 5.8%, to RMB8.93 billion (US$1.32 billion) from RMB8.44 billion in the same period of 2025. The revenue generated from Ximalaya was RMB407 million (US$60 million)[6].
Revenues from music related services increased by 11.0% to RMB7.61 billion (US$1.12 billion), compared with RMB6.85 billion in the same period of 2025. The increase was driven by solid growth in revenues from marketing and consumption services, such as offline performance related services, as well as revenues from membership services. Revenues from membership services were RMB4.79 billion (US$706 million), representing 8.1% year-over-year growth, compared with RMB4.43 billion in the same period of 2025. The consolidation of Ximalaya contributed to the increase of our membership revenues. Additionally, our SVIP membership continued to expand and contributed to our membership revenue growth. Revenues from offline performances related services achieved robust year-over-year growth as we successfully staged several concerts for our strategically collaborated artists. Revenues from social entertainment services and others decreased by 16.4% to RMB1.33 billion (US$196 million) from RMB1.59 billion in the same period of 2025. Cost of revenues increased by 6.2% year-over-year to RMB4.98 billion (US$735 million), mainly due to increased costs related to offline performances, and higher long-form audio content costs due to expansion of content library. Meanwhile, revenue sharing fees decreased, resulting from declines in both revenue sharing ratio and revenues from social entertainment services.
Gross margin was 44.2%, compared with 44.4% in the same period of 2025. The consolidation of Ximalaya had a positive impact to our gross margin of this quarter.
Total operating expenses increased by 12.0% year-over-year to RMB1.30 billion (US$191 million). Operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased to 14.5% from 13.7% in the same period of 2025. The increase was primarily due to the consolidation of Ximalaya, including the amortization of intangible assets arising from the acquisition.
On an IFRS basis, net profit and net profit attributable to equity holders of the Company for the second quarter of 2026 were RMB2.55 billion (US$376 million) and RMB2.47 billion (US$364 million), respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per American Depositary Shares ("ADS") for the second quarter of 2026 were RMB1.58 (US$0.23) and RMB1.57 (US$0.23), respectively. The Company had weighted averages of 1.56 billion basic and 1.58 billion diluted ADSs outstanding, respectively. Each ADS represents two of the Company's Class A ordinary shares.
On a non-IFRS basis, adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2026 were RMB3.25 billion (US$480 million). Non-IFRS net profit was RMB2.78 billion (US$410 million) and non-IFRS net profit attributable to equity holders of the Company was RMB2.69 billion (US$396 million). Non-IFRS basic and diluted earnings per ADS were RMB1.72 (US$0.25) and RMB1.70 (US$0.25), respectively. Please refer to the section in this press release titled "Non-IFRS Financial Measures" for details.
As of June 30, 2026, the combined balance of the Company's cash, cash equivalents, term deposits and short-term investments amounted to RMB44.22 billion (US$6.52 billion), compared with RMB41.00 billion as of March 31, 2026.
Share Repurchase Program
Under our previously announced share repurchase programs, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, we repurchased a total of 43.5 million ADSs in the open market with cash for an aggregate consideration of approximately US$400.0 million at an average price of US$9.2 per ADS.
Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG")
We continued to enhance tailored music experiences for users of all ages. This quarter, we enhanced Youth Mode across our core products and introduced a curated, age-appropriate content library for younger users to safely discover and enjoy music.
Exchange Rate
This announcement contains translations of certain RMB amounts into U.S. dollars ("USD") at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. Unless otherwise stated, all translations from RMB to USD were made at the rate of RMB6.7851 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate in effect on June 30, 2026, in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board. The Company makes no representation that the RMB or USD amounts referred could be converted into USD or RMB, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all. For analytical presentation, all percentages are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in this earnings release.
Non-IFRS Financial Measures
The Company uses non-IFRS financial measures for the period, including non-IFRS net profit, adjusted EBITDA(inc.SBC) and adjusted EBITDA, in evaluating its operating results and for financial and operational decision-making purposes. TME believes that non-IFRS financial measures help identify underlying trends in the Company's business that could otherwise be distorted by the effect of certain expenses that the Company includes in its profit for the period. TME believes that non-IFRS financial measures for the period provide useful information about its results of operations, enhances the overall understanding of its past performance and future prospects and allows for greater visibility with respect to key metrics used by its management in its financial and operational decision-making.
Non-IFRS financial measures for the period should not be considered in isolation or construed as an alternative to operating profit, net profit for the period or any other measure of performance or as an indicator of its operating performance. Investors are encouraged to review non-IFRS financial measures for the period and the reconciliation to its most directly comparable IFRS measure. Non-IFRS financial measures for the period presented here may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. Other companies may calculate similarly titled measures differently, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures to the Company's data. TME encourages investors and others to review its financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure.
Adjusted EBITDA(inc.SBC) for the period represents net profit for the period excluding income tax expense, finance cost, share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures, other gains/losses, interest income, depreciation of property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets, and amortization of intangible assets.
Adjusted EBITDA for the period represents net profit for the period excluding income tax expense, finance cost, share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures, other gains/losses, interest income, depreciation of property, plant and equipment and right-of-use assets, amortization of intangible assets, and share-based compensation expenses.
Non-IFRS net profit for the period represents profit for the period excluding amortization of intangible and other assets arising from business acquisitions or combinations, share-based compensation expenses, net losses/gains from investments and related income tax effects.
Please see the "Unaudited Non-IFRS Financial Measures" included in this press release for a full reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA(inc.SBC), adjusted EBITDA and non-IFRS net profit for the period to its net profit for the period.
[1] Starting from the first quarter of 2026, "online music services" has been renamed to "music related services" to better reflect the nature of our businesses, including long-form audio. Such change does not affect the amounts of our historical revenue or its accounting treatment.
[2] As part of music related services, marketing and consumption services primarily consist of advertising, offline performance related services and artist-related merchandise sales.
[3] As part of music related services, membership services primarily consist of membership fees paid for membership benefits and privileges, including access to music and audio content, and other benefits and privileges within music related services.
[4] See the sections entitled "Non-IFRS Financial Measures" and "Unaudited Non-IFRS Financial Measures" for more information about the non-IFRS measures referred to within this announcement.
[5] Names grouped by artists and bands, sorted in alphabetical order by family names.
[6] On May 18, 2026, the Company completed the acquisition of Ximalaya. Its financial results from the acquisition date have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the second quarter of 2026
About Tencent Music Entertainment
Tencent Music Entertainment Group (NYSE: TME and HKEX: 1698) is the leading all-in-one music and audio entertainment platform in China, operating the country's highly popular and innovative music and audio apps: QQ Music, Kugou Music, Kuwo Music, WeSing and Ximalaya. TME's mission is to create endless possibilities with music and technology. Powered by its content-and-platform dual-engine strategy, TME's expansive offerings extend the value of IP beyond online streaming into offline concerts, artist merchandise, and other IP-centric experiences. TME continuously innovates to deliver a seamless experience where users can discover, listen, sing, watch, perform, and connect across diverse scenarios, while unlocking the enduring value of music and audio IP. For more information, please visit ir.tencentmusic.com.
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and a number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "target," "aim," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "potential," "continue," "is/are likely to" or other similar expressions. Further information regarding these and other risks, uncertainties or factors is included in the Company's filings with the SEC and the HKEX. All information provided in this press release is as of the date of this press release, and the Company does not undertake any duty to update such information, except as required under applicable law.
Investor Relations Contact
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
[email protected]
+86 (755) 8601-3388 ext. 885034
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2025
2026
2025
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
(in millions, except per share data)
(in millions, except per share data)
Revenues
Music related services*
6,854
7,605
1,121
12,658
14,119
2,081
Social entertainment services and others
1,588
1,328
196
3,140
2,709
399
8,442
8,933
1,317
15,798
16,828
2,480
Cost of revenues
(4,693)
(4,984)
(735)
(8,807)
(9,333)
(1,376)
Gross profit
3,749
3,949
582
6,991
7,495
1,105
Selling and marketing expenses
(216)
(236)
(35)
(415)
(507)
(75)
General and administrative expenses
(940)
(1,059)
(156)
(1,884)
(1,999)
(295)
Total operating expenses
(1,156)
(1,295)
(191)
(2,299)
(2,506)
(369)
Interest income
254
229
34
551
475
70
Other gains, net
131
152
22
2,571
218
32
Operating profit
2,978
3,035
447
7,814
5,682
837
Share of net profit of investments accounted
for using equity method
16
37
5
39
30
4
Finance cost
(12)
(5)
(1)
(37)
(51)
(8)
Profit before income tax
2,982
3,067
452
7,816
5,661
834
Income tax expense
(515)
(514)
(76)
(961)
(971)
(143)
Profit for the period
2,467
2,553
376
6,855
4,690
691
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company
2,409
2,471
364
6,700
4,562
672
Non-controlling interests
58
82
12
155
128
19
Earnings per share for Class A and Class B
ordinary shares
Basic
0.79
0.79
0.12
2.19
1.47
0.22
Diluted
0.78
0.78
0.12
2.16
1.46
0.21
Earnings per ADS (2 Class A shares equal to 1 ADS)
Basic
1.57
1.58
0.23
4.38
2.94
0.43
Diluted
1.55
1.57
0.23
4.32
2.91
0.43
Shares used in earnings per Class A and Class B
ordinary share computation:
Basic
3,059,783,073
3,128,328,814
3,128,328,814
3,057,167,291
3,104,964,331
3,104,964,331
Diluted
3,102,937,547
3,151,215,721
3,151,215,721
3,098,531,942
3,132,392,396
3,132,392,396
ADS used in earnings per ADS computation
Basic
1,529,891,537
1,564,164,407
1,564,164,407
1,528,583,645
1,552,482,166
1,552,482,166
Diluted
1,551,468,773
1,575,607,860
1,575,607,860
1,549,265,971
1,566,196,198
1,566,196,198
* Starting from the first quarter of 2026, "online music services" has been renamed to "music related services" to better reflect the nature of our businesses, including long-form
audio. Such change does not affect the amounts of our historical revenue or its accounting treatment.
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
REVENUES FROM MUSIC RELATED SERVICES
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2025
2026
2025
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
(in millions)
(in millions)
Revenues from music related services
Membership services*
4,434
4,792
706
8,718
9,360
1,379
Marketing and consumption services**
2,420
2,813
415
3,940
4,759
701
6,854
7,605
1,121
12,658
14,119
2,081
*As part of music related services, membership services primarily consist of membership fees paid for membership benefits and privileges, including access to music and audio content, and
other benefits and privileges within music related services.
**As part of music related services, marketing and consumption services primarily consist of advertising, offline performance related services and artist-related merchandise sales.
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
UNAUDITED NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2025
2026
2025
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
(in millions, except per share data)
(in millions, except per share data)
Profit for the period
2,467
2,553
376
6,855
4,690
691
Adjustments:
Income tax expense
515
514
76
961
971
143
Finance cost
12
5
1
37
51
8
Share of net profit of investments accounted for
using equity method
(16)
(37)
(5)
(39)
(30)
(4)
Operating profit
2,978
3,035
447
7,814
5,682
837
Other gains, net
(131)
(152)
(22)
(2,571)
(218)
(32)
Interest income
(254)
(229)
(34)
(551)
(475)
(70)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and
right-of-use assets
40
45
7
78
80
12
Amortisation of intangible assets
314
379
56
589
677
100
Adjusted EBITDA(inc. SBC)
2,947
3,078
454
5,359
5,746
847
Share-based compensation
147
176
26
297
339
50
Adjusted EBITDA
3,094
3,254
480
5,656
6,085
897
Profit for the period
2,467
2,553
376
6,855
4,690
691
Adjustments:
Amortization of intangible and other assets arising from
business acquisitions or combinations*
89
157
23
194
246
36
Share-based compensation
147
176
26
308
339
50
Gains from investments**
(2)
(28)
(4)
(2,377)
(30)
(4)
Income tax effects***
(61)
(77)
(11)
(114)
(131)
(19)
Non-IFRS Net Profit
2,640
2,781
410
4,866
5,114
754
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the Company
2,574
2,686
396
4,698
4,959
731
Non-controlling interests
66
95
14
168
155
23
Earnings per share for Class A and Class B
ordinary shares
Basic
0.84
0.86
0.13
1.54
1.60
0.24
Diluted
0.83
0.85
0.13
1.52
1.58
0.23
Earnings per ADS (2 Class A shares equal to 1 ADS)
Basic
1.68
1.72
0.25
3.07
3.19
0.47
Diluted
1.66
1.70
0.25
3.03
3.17
0.47
Shares used in earnings per Class A and Class B
ordinary share computation:
Basic
3,059,783,073
3,128,328,814
3,128,328,814
3,057,167,291
3,104,964,331
3,104,964,331
Diluted
3,102,937,547
3,151,215,721
3,151,215,721
3,098,531,942
3,132,392,396
3,132,392,396
ADS used in earnings per ADS computation
Basic
1,529,891,537
1,564,164,407
1,564,164,407
1,528,583,645
1,552,482,166
1,552,482,166
Diluted
1,551,468,773
1,575,607,860
1,575,607,860
1,549,265,971
1,566,196,198
1,566,196,198
* Represents the amortization of identifiable assets, including intangible assets such as domain name, trademark, copyrights, supplier resources, corporate customer relationships and non-compete
agreement etc., and fair value adjustment on music content (i.e., signed contracts obtained for the rights to access to the music contents for which the amount was amortized over the contract
period), resulting from business acquisitions or combination.
** Including the net gains/losses on deemed disposals/disposals of investments, fair value changes arising from investments, impairment provision of investments, other expenses in relation to
equity transactions of investments and the fair value changes of consideration liabilities related to the acquisition of Ximalaya.
*** Represents the income tax effects of Non-IFRS adjustments.
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As at December 31, 2025
As at June 30, 2026
RMB
RMB
US$
Audited
Unaudited
Unaudited
(in millions)
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
1,201
1,540
227
Land use rights
2,290
2,254
332
Right-of-use assets
287
322
47
Intangible assets
2,899
5,895
869
Goodwill
20,521
29,757
4,386
Investments accounted for using equity method
1,659
2,691
397
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income
26,231
19,147
2,822
Other investments
303
934
138
Prepayments, deposits and other assets
365
445
66
Deferred tax assets
498
633
93
Term deposits
13,810
13,640
2,010
70,064
77,258
11,386
Current assets
Inventories
41
98
14
Accounts receivable
3,903
4,184
617
Prepayments, deposits and other assets
4,183
4,745
699
Other investments
83
72
11
Short-term investments
-
123
18
Term deposits
15,763
6,761
996
Restricted Cash
15
8
1
Cash and cash equivalents
8,470
23,698
3,493
32,458
39,689
5,849
Total assets
102,522
116,947
17,236
EQUITY
Equity attributable to equity holders of the Company
Share capital
2
2
0
Additional paid-in capital
29,919
34,933
5,148
Shares held for share award schemes
(801)
(870)
(128)
Treasury shares
(664)
(3,389)
(499)
Other reserves
22,450
16,478
2,429
Retained earnings
29,381
31,118
4,586
80,287
78,272
11,536
Non-controlling interests
2,763
2,801
413
Total equity
83,050
81,073
11,949
LIABILITIES
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
-
7,142
1,053
Notes payables
3,497
3,390
500
Other payables and other liabilities
379
468
69
Deferred tax liabilities
504
1,462
215
Lease liabilities
200
218
32
Deferred revenue
303
447
66
4,883
13,127
1,935
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
6,284
6,716
990
Other payables and other liabilities
3,558
4,451
656
Borrowings
-
5,997
884
Current tax liabilities
1,092
999
147
Lease liabilities
116
137
20
Deferred revenue
3,539
4,447
655
14,589
22,747
3,352
Total liabilities
19,472
35,874
5,287
Total equity and liabilities
102,522
116,947
17,236
TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended June 30
Six Months Ended June 30
2025
2026
2025
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
Unaudited
(in millions)
(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,638
2,864
422
4,157
5,196
766
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities
(633)
(3,718)
(548)
(3,854)
2,932
432
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
(2,056)
6,262
923
(2,512)
7,273
1,072
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
(1,051)
5,408
797
(2,209)
15,401
2,270
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period
Binance přidala do Monitoring Tagu 5 altcoinů: GLMR, ICX, MOVR, RARE a SOPH. Štítek neznamená okamžitý delist, ale zvyšuje riziko vyřazení. Podle oznámení z 11. srpna 2026 jde o Moonbeam (GLMR), ICON (ICX), Moonriver (MOVR), SuperRare (RARE) a Sophon (SOPH).
Binance, yaptığı son incelemelerin ardından 5 altcoin’i Monitoring Tag listesine ekledi. Moonbeam (GLMR), ICON (ICX), Moonriver (MOVR), SuperRare (RARE) ve Sophon (SOPH) için getirilen etiket, bu tokenların diğer listelenen varlıklara kıyasla daha yüksek volatilite ve risk taşıdığını gösteriyor.
Binance’in açıklamasına göre Monitoring Tag taşıyan tokenlar, borsanın listeleme kriterlerini karşılamaya devam edip etmedikleri açısından düzenli olarak inceleniyor. Bu nedenle söz konusu altcoinler için ilerleyen dönemde delist edilme riski bulunuyor.
Binance’in 11 Ağustos 2026 tarihli duyurusuna göre Monitoring Tag kapsamına alınan tokenlar şöyle:
Moonbeam (GLMR) ICON (ICX) Moonriver (MOVR) SuperRare (RARE) Sophon (SOPH) Binance, söz konusu etiketlerin duyurunun ardından güncelleneceğini açıkladı.
Monitoring Tag, doğrudan bir delist kararı anlamına gelmiyor. Ancak bu etiketi taşıyan projeler, Binance’in listeleme kriterleri açısından daha yakından takip ediliyor.
Monitoring Tag Ne Anlama Geliyor? Binance, Monitoring Tag uygulamasını yüksek volatilite ve diğer tokenlara kıyasla daha yüksek risk taşıyan varlıkları yakından izlemek için kullanıyor.
Borsaya göre bu tokenlar düzenli proje incelemelerine tabi tutuluyor. Yapılan değerlendirmelerin sonucunda Monitoring Tag bir tokendan kaldırılabileceği gibi başka projelere de eklenebiliyor.
Ancak kriterleri karşılamayan projeler için delist süreci de gündeme gelebiliyor.
Bu nedenle etiketi alan 5 altcoinin yatırımcıları açısından asıl dikkat edilmesi gereken nokta, Binance’in bundan sonraki incelemeleri olacak.
Binance Altcoinleri Hangi Kriterlere Göre İnceliyor? Binance, Monitoring Tag değerlendirmelerinde birden fazla faktörü dikkate alıyor.
Bunlar arasında projenin ekip bağlılığı, geliştirme faaliyetlerinin seviyesi ve kalitesi, işlem hacmi ve likidite bulunuyor.
Borsa ayrıca ağın saldırılara karşı güvenliğini, ağ ve akıllı sözleşme istikrarını, projenin kamuoyuyla iletişimini ve Binance’in dönemsel bilgi taleplerine verilen yanıtları da değerlendiriyor.
Bunun yanında token arzında maddi veya gerekçesiz artışlar, token ekonomisindeki değişiklikler ve etik dışı veya dolandırıcılık niteliğindeki davranışlara ilişkin kanıtlar da inceleme kapsamında yer alıyor.
Bu 5 Altcoin Delist Edilecek mi? Şu aşamada böyle bir karar bulunmuyor.
Binance’in Monitoring Tag uygulaması, doğrudan delist anlamına gelmiyor. Ancak borsa açıkça bu etiketi taşıyan tokenların listeleme kriterlerini artık karşılamama ve platformdan çıkarılma riski taşıdığını belirtiyor.
Dolayısıyla GLMR, ICX, MOVR, RARE ve SOPH için bundan sonraki dönem kritik olacak.
Binance’in yapacağı periyodik incelemeler sonucunda etiket kaldırılabilir veya tokenlar için daha ileri bir işlem uygulanabilir.
Binance’teki Diğer Hizmetler Etkilenecek mi? Binance, Monitoring Tag’in eklenmesinin söz konusu tokenlarla bağlantılı diğer hizmetleri etkilemeyeceğini açıkladı.
Dolayısıyla bugün itibarıyla duyuru, bu varlıkların Binance’teki tüm ürünlerinin durdurulduğu anlamına gelmiyor.
Ancak yatırımcıların özellikle delist riskini göz önünde bulundurarak Binance’in ilerleyen dönemde yayımlayacağı proje incelemelerini takip etmesi gerekiyor.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Zlato vzrostlo na 4 400 USD za unci a dostalo se na dvouměsíční maximum. Podporuje ho silná poptávka čínských investorů a nákupy rezerv Čínské lidové banky.
Gold rose to 4,400 USD per ounce on Tuesday, reaching a two-month high. Demand for the precious metal is growing rapidly, even amid heightened inflation risks and expectations of higher interest rates driven by elevated oil prices.
Chinese institutional investors continue to build positions in gold as a defensive asset amid heightened volatility in other markets. China’s gold-backed ETFs are recording their longest run of inflows in months.
The People’s Bank of China is also supporting the market. In July, the regulator increased its gold reserves by approximately 20 tonnes, following an increase of around 15 tonnes in June – the largest monthly addition since October 2023.
At the same time, uncertainty persists around a potential US–Iran agreement that could end the conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Investors are also awaiting key US inflation data this week, which could shift expectations for future Federal Reserve policy.
Technical analysis
On the H4 XAU/USD chart, the market formed a consolidation range around the 4,341 USD level and, following an upside breakout, moved higher to 4,435 USD. A consolidation range is now forming below this level. A move lower towards 4,370 USD is expected next, with a possible extension to 4,340 USD. A further rise towards 4,575 USD is anticipated as the local upside target. The MACD indicator signals the early stages of bearish momentum, with its signal line above the centre line at recent highs and beginning to turn downwards.
On the H1 chart, the market broke above the 4,371 USD level and moved higher to 4,435 USD, followed by a correction to test 4,371 USD from above. A broad consolidation range is forming around 4,371 USD. A move higher towards 4,460 USD is expected, followed by a decline to 4,371 USD. The Stochastic oscillator confirms this scenario, with its signal line below 50 and pointing downwards towards 20, indicating increasing short-term downside pressure.
ConclusionGold has rallied to a two-month high, driven by robust demand from Chinese institutional investors and the People’s Bank of China’s continued reserve accumulation. Despite rising inflation risks and expectations of higher interest rates, the metal’s appeal as a defensive asset has strengthened amid market volatility. Uncertainty over a potential US–Iran agreement and the outlook for the Strait of Hormuz, along with upcoming US inflation data, continues to keep markets on edge. Technically, gold may see a short-term pullback towards 4,340–4,370 USD before potentially resuming its uptrend towards 4,575 USD. The metal’s near-term direction will depend on geopolitical developments and US monetary policy expectations.
Starwood Property Trust (NYSE:STWD) reported second-quarter distributable earnings of $152 million, or $0.40 per share, as the company continued to work through non-accrual loans and real estate-owned assets while increasing investment activity and extending its debt maturities.
Chief Financial Officer Rina Paniry said results continued to reflect the earnings impact of non-accrual and REO assets, as well as elevated cash balances. The company reported no new non-accrual loans, no new five-rated loans and no new REO assets during the quarter or year to date.
“As our new non-accrual and REO loans have slowed, we have gained momentum in resolutions,” Paniry said.
Asset Resolutions and Reserve Position Starwood Property Trust ended the quarter with approximately $1.9 billion of non-accrual and REO assets on a distributable-earnings basis, excluding $706 million of reserves already reflected in book value. The reserve total included $485 million of CECL reserves and $221 million of REO reserves.
The company expects to resolve roughly $800 million, or 40%, of its current non-accrual and REO balance by the end of 2026, subject to market conditions. It is under contract or in discussions to sell three REO properties and multiple units in a New York City residential project. Those transactions are expected to generate $148 million in cash proceeds and resolve $195 million of assets on a distributable-earnings basis during the third quarter.
Paniry said the anticipated sales are expected to produce an approximately $47 million realized loss in third-quarter distributable earnings. One asset was repriced following higher interest rates, creating a $12 million difference from its GAAP mark. Absent that adjustment, she said the company’s GAAP reserves aligned with expected sale prices.
President Jeff DiModica said three multifamily loans were downgraded to four-risk ratings during the quarter: a $73 million property in Phoenix, a $63 million property in Clearwater, Florida, and a $74 million property in Mesa, Arizona. He attributed the downgrades to higher forward rates and pressure on near-term cash flow in some Sun Belt multifamily markets following elevated supply.
Subsequent to quarter-end, two office loans repaid at par for a combined $171 million, reducing U.S. office exposure to 7.6% of assets and global office exposure to 8.9%, both company lows, according to DiModica.
Investment Activity and Segment Results The company deployed $2.5 billion across its businesses during the second quarter and another $1.7 billion in July, bringing year-to-date investment activity to $6.7 billion. DiModica said the company was on pace for a record year of investment activity and expected the third quarter to be its strongest commercial-lending origination quarter.
Commercial and residential lending generated distributable earnings of $186 million, or $0.49 per share. In commercial lending, Starwood originated $1.4 billion and funded more than $1 billion, including preexisting commitments. Following $447 million of repayments, the funded loan portfolio reached a record $17.3 billion.
Infrastructure lending committed $441 million during the quarter, with the portfolio ending at $3.1 billion after comparable repayment activity. DiModica said 92% of the infrastructure portfolio was internally rated one or two, while 97% of loans had public or private Moody’s ratings.
The property segment contributed $34 million, or $0.09 per share, of distributable earnings. At Woodstar, the company’s Florida affordable-multifamily portfolio, Starwood began implementing authorized 8.4% HUD rent increases on July 1. The company expects the earnings benefit to begin appearing in third-quarter results.
Starwood also expects to refinance $416 million of Woodstar debt maturing within six months. Paniry said the company anticipates an approximately $140 million financing upsize, of which Starwood’s share would be about $110 million for reinvestment.
In net lease, distributable earnings rose to $0.05 per share from $0.03 in the prior quarter. The company acquired $179 million of properties during the quarter at a blended 7.39% capitalization rate. The portfolio totaled $2.7 billion across 527 properties in 44 states, with 100% occupancy, zero defaults and a weighted average lease term of 16.8 years.
Capital Markets and Liquidity Starwood completed $2.1 billion of corporate debt transactions in the second quarter, including $1.1 billion of unsecured senior notes and a $275 million increase to its Term Loan B. It also repriced an existing $696 million term loan to SOFR plus 200 basis points.
After quarter-end, the company repaid $400 million of July 2026 notes and prepaid $500 million of January 2027 notes. DiModica said Starwood has no further corporate debt maturities until July 2027 and has extended weighted average corporate debt maturities to approximately three years.
The company had $1.2 billion of current liquidity at quarter-end and a debt-to-undepreciated-equity ratio of 2.74 times. Its unencumbered asset pool totaled $6.9 billion against $4.5 billion of unsecured debt.
Paniry said the early redemption of the January 2027 notes will produce a $6.3 million third-quarter loss on extinguishment of debt because of the termination of an associated interest-rate hedge. However, she said replacing the prior obligation with new 5.875% notes is expected to save more than $15 million over the next five years.
Dividend, Buybacks and Outlook Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Barry Sternlicht acknowledged that the company is not currently earning enough to cover its dividend, but said management remains confident that resolving underperforming assets and redeploying capital into new investments can restore earnings power.
“We’re pretty confident in our ability to get back to the earnings power that we’ll need to drive the dividend and restore our coverage of dividend,” Sternlicht said.
He said the company is not considering a dividend-policy change at present, though it would revisit that position if conditions materially changed. Starwood repurchased $30 million of stock year to date under its $400 million authorization, and management indicated it could become more active in repurchases.
Looking ahead, Sternlicht said Starwood plans to discuss a new business line during its next quarterly update and continues to evaluate acquisition and sector-consolidation opportunities.
About Starwood Property Trust (NYSE:STWD) Starwood Property Trust (NYSE: STWD) is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that specializes in originating, acquiring and managing commercial mortgage loans and other real estate-related investments. The company’s portfolio spans a variety of asset classes, including senior mortgages, mezzanine debt, preferred equity and direct equity investments in commercial properties. By focusing on both debt and equity capital solutions, Starwood Property Trust seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for its shareholders through a combination of current income and capital appreciation.
Operating primarily in the United States, Starwood Property Trust deploys capital across a broad range of property types, such as multifamily residential, office, retail, hotel and industrial.
Tesla stahuje v USA 20 349 vozů kvůli příliš jasným potkávacím světlům, která mohou zhoršovat viditelnost protijedoucích řidičů a zvyšovat riziko nehody. Týká se to vybraných Model 3 a Model Y.
A Tesla logo is pictured on a car in the rain in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., May 5, 2021. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesTesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab is recalling 20,349 vehicles in the U.S. over low-beam headlights that may be excessively bright, potentially reducing visibility for oncoming drivers and raising crash risk, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Tuesday.
Here are further details:
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
The recall affects certain Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, NHTSA said.
A remedy is yet to be finalized, according to the auto safety regulator.
The recall comes as Tesla faces continuing regulatory scrutiny over vehicle safety.
In July, NHTSA said it had opened a preliminary investigation into about 1.2 million Tesla vehicles over reports of suspension failures that could lead to a loss of steering control.
Reporting by Ananya Palyekar in Bengaluru; Editing by Rashmi Aich
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Google AI Overviews pletou firmy s konkurencí a mohou jim škodit na reputaci i tržbách. Někteří majitelé malých podniků říkají, že se proti chybným shrnutím těžko brání.
Getty Images; Alyssa Powell/BI Help! An AI overview says my business is terrible They worked tirelessly to build their company's reputation. Then came Google's new AI summary.
Getty Images; Alyssa Powell/BI
By You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.
2026-08-11T08:22:01.237Z
Read in app
Damian Mansell was stunned to see what Google was saying about his nascent business. When he searched for reviews of The Plastics Shed — the online building-plastics supplier he incorporated at the start of 2025 — the platform's AI overview said customer feedback was "overwhelmingly negative." It listed complaints about delayed deliveries, lying staff, and damaged products. While the company had some positive feedback, the summary said, its poor customer service was a "significant recurring issue." The good news: The reviews weren't actually about Mansell's company. They appeared to be for competitors and companies that sold actual plastic sheds. The bad news: He had no idea what to do about it.
Mansell, who lives in the UK, says. "I can see how that happens, but why should it happen with Google?" Mansell, who lives in the UK. "I mean, obviously, the forefront of AI technology."
To make matters worse, Mansell was paying Google about £700 a month to advertise, while the summaries warned people away. Following advice he found on online forums, he repeatedly submitted feedback to Google that the abstract was wrong. After a couple of weeks, it started to improve. AI has been an invaluable tool for him to build out his business, so he doesn't want to malign the tech in general, but he wishes there were more accountability when things go awry.
"AI gives the common man the knowledge, but it can also ruin the common man," he says.
Google's AI Overviews are rapidly becoming consumers' first impression of businesses. Instead of scanning reviews and websites, many users see a single synopsis that purports to blend information from across the internet into a comprehensive digest. When those summaries are inaccurate, misleading, or jumbled, business owners say they can cause serious reputational damage and financial losses, and there's often little recourse.
Mansell still wonders how much business the issue cost him. He's tried to get Google to refund some of his ad dollars, but he hasn't had any luck, despite his best efforts.
"I'm like a dog with a bone," he says. "But I met my match with Google."
Internet search has changed drastically in the last few years: Instead of a list of links, Google often provides a single response that's supposed to summarize the constellation of online information. These overviews look right and sound confident, but they draw on a litany of sources with varying levels of reliability. They can even spit out information that is flat-out wrong. (Like recommending people make glue pizza.) Misinformation on the internet isn't new, but the clean, concise, AI-concocted package is.
"With the traditional search engine, the user sees multiple things. So if one of them has something wrong, chances are something else would counterbalance it," says Chirag Shah, a professor at the University of Washington's Information School. That's now gone, and with AI overviews, you're getting "The Answer," which may or may not be correct.
I look at the AI overview, I wouldn't call me.For business owners, the consequences can be more than a mild annoyance or temporary confusion. These AI summaries are becoming their digital storefronts. Across the internet, you can find entrepreneurs and managers grumbling that AI summaries mix them up with other companies, surface complaints that are directed at someone else, or dole out false facts.
Earlier this year, Betty Whitney started noticing that Google's overviews were conflating her company — NW Select Property Management in Idaho — with similarly named businesses. The top panel seemed to be merging her firm with one in the region that closed years ago and mixing her reviews up with property managers in other states.
"If I'm a customer, and I'm looking for a property management company, and I look at the AI overview, I wouldn't call me," she says.
Whitney has spent months trying to amend the situation. Like Mansell, she's used Google's feedback mechanism to give overviews a "thumbs down" when they're wrong, and she's made some adjustments to her website to try to feed the AI crawlers more accurate data. After bringing her problem to a Google support forum, she got in touch with a third-party SEO expert who was able to help her out — sort of. The overview has gotten better, but it still periodically reverts to the mistake-filled version.
Three years after relocating, Philippa Main, a real estate agent in Northern Virginia, still can't completely convince Google that she's no longer in Florida. When she searches her name, most of the information that comes up about her is correct, but then there's a line that confidently states that she's been "servicing the Tampa Bay area since 2014," even though it sits right above her Virginia address. Main's tried everything she could think of to get it adjusted, combing the internet to try to find where the AI is drawing from, emailing Google, and asking friends to report the issue.
"There's so much competition in my industry that if any single thing seems off, someone's just going to call the next person on the list," she says. It's especially frustrating for small businesses, because "we're just trying to do everything that we can to compete with these massive companies who actually do have direct lines to Google or their representatives," she says. "Google just doesn't seem to care."
In a statement, a Google spokesperson told me that its search-related AI experiences are "rooted in our quality ranking systems and are designed to present a range of perspectives" from all over the internet. "AI Overviews are responsive to people's specific queries; for example, if someone specifically searches for complaints about a business, the generated response will likely show relevant information from sources across the web," they said.
It's no secret that AI is not always a bastion of truth — almost everyone who's used the technology has experienced a response from it that's highly off-base at some point. As the New York Times wrote in April, Google processes over five trillion searches a year, and even if its overviews are right nine times out of 10, that still means half a trillion wrongs. Google acknowledges that while the overwhelming majority of its overviews are accurate, there can be cases where they miss context or misinterpret content. A Google spokesperson said the study the Times cited has "serious holes."
Google's summaries synthesize information from many places — a big source is, obviously, the company website, but it also gobbles up Reddit posts, 10-year-old blogs, and Yelp reviews. The platform provides links that are supposed to back up its claims, but those links don't always support the output. AI has also been known to hallucinate, meaning it invents plausible-sounding things from thin air.
"There's so much room for error," says Lily Ray, an SEO and AI search consultant and the founder of Algorythmic, a consultancy.
The overviews are delivered with such assurance that people don't realize they're looking at an extracted or generated answer that may be incomplete or incorrect. Instead of clicking on five links to compare information or just spending a few minutes confirming, they skim the automated summary and call it a day. The AI says this roofing company's reviews are terrible? Onto the next one! Rarely do people dig in to check if it's pulling complaints for a business in another state.
There's so much room for error.Search industry professionals say this is a new frontier for businesses. They no longer have to focus so heavily on search rankings but must instead manage the AI's interpretation of their reputations. It's not about chasing clicks —it's about making sure AI knows you exist and is nice and correct about you. Ray says it's the "biggest change to search" she's seen in her 16-year career.
This brave new world presents all sorts of nuances and complications. Google likes to cite Reddit a lot, which "can go awry very fast," Ray says. Reddit has a lot of good information, but it can also be a little wild. The same goes for YouTube comments, which the AI also seems to like. Some brands suffer from an information void: there's not a lot of content out there about them, so AI tries to fill in the gaps or comes up with bad answers. Or, they've got a name problem where they're too close to another entity, and the model can't tell who's who. There may be bad actors who intentionally leave false or negative information about businesses online for AI summaries to pick up. Even simple facts, such as store hours or phone numbers, require a concerted effort across the entire internet to keep straight. "There's so much maintenance work that has to go into keeping a brand's content and information accurate and up to date," Ray says.
Michael King, the founder and CEO of iPullRank, a digital marketing agency, tells me he focuses on citation accuracy and on gaining some influence over AI outputs. "The way these systems work is they're basically doing a bunch of searches in the background, and then they're feeding content to the large language model," King says. Businesses need to create more "surface area" — meaning publishing more content and targeting more keywords — to help AI find the right answer. He encourages clients to position themselves as the experts on their own brands.
"You've got to think of it as more like a reputation management campaign than your classic SEO campaign," King says. "It's just far more multidimensional."
Ben Fisher does this for a living and still runs into problems. He noticed that Google's AI summary was warning that his company — Steady Demand, a SEO and social media consultancy for small businesses — was a scam. After doing some digging, he realized it was referring to an old Reddit thread about a similarly named app and had to take some time out to "train" Google to know the difference.
"The big problem is there's nobody to contact. The other big problem is you search once, and you're done," Fisher says. Large language models don't produce the same results every time, even for the same questions, so people don't realize one result might not match the next month, week, or minute. "It's still a situation where you should be monitoring things on a regular basis," he says. "Otherwise, you're just not going to know why you're not getting calls."
This is a difficult issue to tackle from a technological, entrepreneurial, and regulatory point of view. LLMs are improving, but they're never going to be perfect. Business owners can do their best to keep an eye on how they're showing up in search results, but they've also got 9,000 other things to do.
Reasonable minds — and different countries and legal systems — can disagree about how responsible Google should be when the robot screws up. In Canada, a musician has filed a $1.5 million lawsuit against Google claiming that its AI summary falsely identified him as a sex offender. A court in Germany recently made a preliminary ruling that Google is liable for false statements made in its AI overviews. A Google spokesperson said that the German case focuses on "specific and narrow errors," not the way overviews display content, and that the company disagrees with the ruling and plans to appeal. Shah says that in the US, we have "very little consumer protection" for these types of issues.
"I don't think lawmakers even fully understand the technology enough and the implications to be able to do anything," he says.
In the meantime, business owners are left white-knuckling it, hoping that the mysterious technology at the heart of those AI summaries looks kindly upon them. That's the case with Mansell, who's proud to say that Google's overview of the Plastics Shed is now "fantastic", just like many of his actual reviews.
"It does worry me with regard to what can be said about you without any recourse," he says.
Despite his frustrations with the summary and failed attempts to get a refund, Mansell still pays to advertise with Google — otherwise, people don't click through to his website. "I just gave up," he says. "It was just an absolute pointless exercise."
Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy.
Business Insider's Discourse stories provide perspectives on the day's most pressing issues, informed by analysis, reporting, and expertise.
Google AI Small Business More Discourse Most popular
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Business Insider tells the stories you want to know about the world of business, technology, and finance
Emily Stewart You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.
Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent on Business Insider’s Discourse team. She focuses on consumerism, culture, and the economy, among other topics. Some of her biggest stories have explored Red Lobster’s demise, middle-class shoplifting, convenience stores’ struggles, the rise of illicit drugs as work performance-enhancers, and generational finance trends, including Gen Z’s love for AmEx and the impending avalanche of baby boomers’ stuff. She also writes regularly about sports betting, the alcohol industry, work, millennials, and economic trends. Emily appears regularly on nationally syndicated radio shows and podcasts, including Marketplace, The Weekend Dive, and Today, Explained. She has guest hosted C-SPAN’s “After Words” and moderated multiple panels on economic policy and workplace dynamics.Before joining Business Insider, Emily was at Vox, where she covered business and the economy and wrote a newsletter, “The Big Squeeze,” about how people experience the forces of the economy and capitalism day to day. Prior to that, she worked at TheStreet.
Intel Foundry ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšil výnosy o 31 % na 5,8 miliardy USD, ale stále prodělal 2,1 miliardy USD. Většina výnosů dál pochází z výroby pro vlastní divize Intelu.
Intel (INTC -4.06%) posted its fastest revenue growth in nearly 15 years last month, with second-quarter revenue rising 25% year over year to $16.1 billion. But the unit the company's whole transformation is staked on, Intel Foundry, is still deep in the red. The chipmaking arm lost $2.1 billion in the quarter on $5.8 billion of revenue.
The loss, I'd argue, is where the progress lives. A year ago, the foundry lost $3.2 billion on $4.4 billion of revenue -- about 72 cents lost for every dollar the unit brought in. This quarter it lost about 36 cents per dollar. The loss per dollar of revenue halved in a year.
Intel has told investors the foundry should stop losing money in 2027, and the growth stock (up more than 160% in 2026 as of this writing) is priced as if that arrival is on schedule. So how much revenue does the foundry need before the losses stop?
Image source: Intel.
A smaller loss on more revenue The trend is now three quarters deep and pointed one direction. Intel Foundry's revenue climbed from $4.4 billion in the year-ago quarter to $5.4 billion in the first quarter of 2026 and $5.8 billion in the second. Its operating loss, meanwhile, narrowed from $3.2 billion to $2.4 billion and then $2.1 billion. And the second quarter's 31% year-over-year revenue growth was itself an acceleration, up from 16% in the first quarter.
The company's explanation is about the factories themselves. Production on Intel 18A, the company's newest widely deployed manufacturing process, came in about 25% above Intel's internal target and rose more than 50% from the first quarter. Better yields and faster cycle times are bringing down wafer costs, and Intel says the foundry has cut the cost of its main Panther Lake chip by roughly 50% so far this year.
Clearly, the factories are getting cheaper to run.
Intel's biggest customer is Intel But external customers supplied just $293 million of the foundry's $5.8 billion in quarterly revenue. The rest (roughly 19 of every 20 dollars) came from building chips for Intel's own product groups.
Of course, that internal demand is no small thing. Intel's data center and AI segment grew revenue 59% year over year last quarter, and the company says it is supply constrained, with data center customers demanding more chips than Intel can produce.
And chief financial officer David Zinsner said in the company's published earnings call remarks that customers "continue to signal a strong and sustainable spending environment." After all, a foundry filled by its owner's orders beats an empty one.
But internal revenue can only prove the factories work. It can't prove the business does.
Intel still hasn't announced a major outside customer for its leading-edge processes -- security specialist Fortinet, which in July became the foundry's first named customer under CEO Lip-Bu Tan, is buying chips built on an older process. Until other companies' chips fill these factories at scale, the foundry rises and falls with Intel's own product cycle.
Today's Change
(
-4.06
%) $
-4.13
Current Price
$
97.52
Break-even has a date Intel's stated target is foundry break-even in 2027. Zinsner said last year that getting there requires only a few billion dollars of additional external revenue. That's a small number against the unit's $23 billion annual revenue pace, and a large one against the roughly $1.2 billion annual pace external customers supply today.
The bridge is supposed to be Intel 14A, the next manufacturing process, which is being prepared for risk production -- early trial manufacturing -- in 2027 with high-volume output committed for 2028. Meaningful outside volume, in other words, likely arrives near the deadline, not ahead of it. And the spending comes first: Intel says it is substantially increasing its investments to support the demand it sees. On Monday, the company announced a $15 billion common stock offering to help fund the build-out without adding new debt.
To me, the external revenue line is the one to watch, and the arithmetic hasn't changed: outside customers pay Intel about $1.2 billion a year, and break-even needs a few billion more.
The loss math is improving at a pace that, I think, makes 2027 believable. The stock is another matter. At about $98 as of this writing, shares trade near 60 times next year's expected earnings -- a rich valuation by any standard, and a price that assumes the foundry bet has already been won.
The foundry is doing what Intel said it would, a quarter at a time. At this price, the stock needs it to keep doing exactly that for two more years.
HUYA ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšila čisté výnosy o 11 % na 1 739,3 mil. RMB a poprvé po roce vykázala čistý zisk 1,6 mil. RMB. Výnosy z herních služeb, reklamy a dalších aktivit vyskočily o 54,1 %.
, /PRNewswire/ -- HUYA Inc. ("Huya" or the "Company") (NYSE: HUYA), a leading game-related entertainment and services provider, today announced its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026.
Second Quarter 2026 Highlights
Total net revenues increased by 11.0% to RMB1,739.3 million (US$256.3 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB1,567.1 million for the same period of 2025. Game-related services, advertising and other revenues increased by 54.1% to RMB637.9 million (US$94.0 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB413.9 million for the same period of 2025. Operating loss narrowed to RMB7.0 million (US$1.0 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB23.7 million for the same period of 2025. Non-GAAP1 operating income was RMB16.2 million (US$2.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB0.4 million for the same period of 2025. Net income attributable to HUYA Inc. was RMB1.6 million (US$0.2 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with a net loss attributable to HUYA Inc. of RMB5.5 million for the same period of 2025. Non-GAAP net income attributable to HUYA Inc. was RMB36.4 million (US$5.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB47.5 million for the same period of 2025. Mr. Junhong Huang, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Huya, commented, "Huya's strategic transformation gained further traction in the second quarter of 2026. Total net revenues reached RMB1.74 billion, up 11.0% year-over-year, while game-related services, advertising, and other revenues increased 54.1% year-over-year to RMB637.9 million and represented 36.7% of total net revenues."
"Goose Goose Duck mobile re-entered the Top 5 on the Apple App Store free games chart in the Chinese mainland at the end of July, further validating Huya's content-led game publishing model. Game publishing remains a strategic priority for Huya and our pipeline is robust, with The Legend of Swordman: Reunion and Xiao Xiao Qi Yu both progressing toward launch. Goose Goose Duck mobile's strong performance demonstrates how Huya's content ecosystem and integrated marketing capabilities can drive user acquisition, engagement and monetization, reinforcing our confidence in the long-term potential of this business," Mr. Huang concluded.
Mr. Raymond Peng Lei, Chief Financial Officer of Huya, added, "We continue to see financial improvement at the operating level, supported by ongoing growth in game-related services, advertising and other revenues. We are pleased to announce that our board of directors has approved an increase in the total authorized amount of our 2026 Share Repurchase Program from US$50 million to US$100 million, reflecting our confidence in Huya's business outlook and our commitment to enhancing long-term shareholder value."
Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
Total net revenues increased by 11.0% to RMB1,739.3 million (US$256.3 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB1,567.1 million for the same period of 2025.
Live streaming revenues were RMB1,101.5 million (US$162.3 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB1,153.2 million for the same period of 2025, primarily reflecting the live streaming industry's current environment.
Game-related services, advertising and other revenues increased by 54.1% to RMB637.9 million (US$94.0 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB413.9 million for the same period of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher revenues from in-game item sales and advertising, as well as the contribution from the commercialization of Goose Goose Duck mobile.
Cost of revenues increased by 9.6% to RMB1,484.3 million (US$218.8 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB1,354.8 million for the same period of 2025, generally in line with the increase in revenues, primarily due to increased revenue sharing fees and costs of in-game virtual items. Revenue sharing fees and content costs, a key component of cost of revenues, increased by 3.2% year-over-year to RMB1,214.7 million (US$179.0 million) for the second quarter of 2026.
Gross profit increased by 20.1% to RMB255.0 million (US$37.6 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB212.3 million for the same period of 2025. Gross margin was 14.7% for the second quarter of 2026, compared with 13.5% for the same period of 2025.
Research and development expenses decreased by 1.4% to RMB120.4 million (US$17.8 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB122.2 million for the same period of 2025.
Sales and marketing expenses increased by 57.7% to RMB91.0 million (US$13.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB57.7 million for the same period of 2025, primarily due to continued marketing and promotional efforts related to Goose Goose Duck mobile.
General and administrative expenses decreased by 8.4% to RMB58.4 million (US$8.6 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB63.7 million for the same period of 2025, primarily due to decreased professional service fees.
Other income was RMB7.8 million (US$1.2 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB7.6 million for the same period of 2025.
Operating loss narrowed to RMB7.0 million (US$1.0 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB23.7 million for the same period of 2025.
Non-GAAP operating income was RMB16.2 million (US$2.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB0.4 million for the same period of 2025.
Interest income decreased by 56.6% to RMB25.7 million (US$3.8 million) for the second quarter of 2026, from RMB59.1 million for the same period of 2025, primarily due to a decrease in the average deposit balance as a result of special cash dividends and lower interest rates.
Net income attributable to HUYA Inc. was RMB1.6 million (US$0.2 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with a net loss attributable to HUYA Inc. of RMB5.5 million for the same period of 2025.
Non-GAAP net income attributable to HUYA Inc. was RMB36.4 million (US$5.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB47.5 million for the same period of 2025.
Basic and diluted net income per American depositary share ("ADS") were each RMB0.01 (US$0.00) for the second quarter of 2026. Basic and diluted net loss per ADS were each RMB0.02 for the second quarter of 2025. Each ADS represents one Class A ordinary share of the Company.
Non-GAAP basic and diluted net income per ADS were each RMB0.16 (US$0.02) for the second quarter of 2026. Non-GAAP basic and diluted net income per ADS were each RMB0.21 for the second quarter of 2025.
As of June 30, 2026, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, short-term deposits and long-term deposits of RMB3,213.1 million (US$473.5 million), compared with RMB3,455.1 million as of March 31, 2026.
Share Repurchase Program
On August 7, 2026, the Company's board of directors authorized an increase of US$50 million to the authorized repurchase amount under the Company's existing share repurchase program originally adopted on March 18, 2026 (the "2026 Share Repurchase Program"). Following such increase, the total authorized repurchase amount under the 2026 Share Repurchase Program is US$100 million. As of June 30, 2026, the Company had repurchased 3.2 million ADSs under the 2026 Share Repurchase Program for an aggregate consideration of US$7.6 million.
Earnings Webinar
The Company's management will host a Tencent Meeting Webinar at 6:00 a.m. U.S. Eastern Time on August 11, 2026 (6:00 p.m. Beijing/Hong Kong time on August 11, 2026), to review and discuss the Company's business and financial performance.
For participants who wish to join the webinar, please complete the online registration in advance using the links provided below. Upon registration, participants will receive an email with webinar access information, including meeting ID, meeting link, dial-in numbers, and a unique attendee ID to join the webinar.
Participant Online Registration:
A live webcast of the webinar will be accessible at https://ir.huya.com, and a replay of the webcast will be available following the session.
1 The Company's non-GAAP financial measures exclude share-based compensation expenses, amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions, and impairment loss of investments, to the extent applicable. For more information, please refer to the section titled "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" and the table captioned "HUYA Inc. Unaudited Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Results" at the end of this press release.
2 For the purpose of this announcement only, Chinese Mainland excludes the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, and Taiwan.
About HUYA Inc.
HUYA Inc. is a leading game-related entertainment and services provider. Huya delivers dynamic live streaming and video content and a rich array of services spanning games, e-sports, and other interactive entertainment genres to a large, highly engaged community of game enthusiasts. Huya has cultivated a robust entertainment ecosystem powered by AI and other advanced technologies, serving users and partners across the gaming universe, including game companies, e-sports tournament organizers, broadcasters and talent agencies. Leveraging this strong foundation, Huya has also expanded into innovative game-related services, such as game distribution, in-game item sales, advertising and more. Huya continues to extend its footprint in China and abroad, meeting the evolving needs of gamers, content creators, and industry partners worldwide.
For more information, please visit: https://ir.huya.com.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial information is prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"), except that the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity, consolidated statements of cash flows, and the detailed notes have not been presented. Huya uses non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP operating loss, non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to HUYA Inc., non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders, non-GAAP basic and diluted net income (loss) per ordinary share, and non-GAAP basic and diluted net income (loss) per ADS, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP gross profit is gross profit excluding share-based compensation expenses allocated in cost of revenues. Non-GAAP operating loss is operating loss excluding share-based compensation expenses and amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions. Non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to HUYA Inc. is net income (loss) attributable to HUYA Inc. excluding share-based compensation expenses, impairment loss of investments, and amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions, net of income taxes, to the extent applicable. Non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders is net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders excluding share-based compensation expenses, impairment loss of investments, and amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions, net of income taxes, to the extent applicable. Non-GAAP basic and diluted net income (loss) per ordinary share and per ADS is non-GAAP net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and ADS used in the calculation of non-GAAP basic and diluted net income (loss) per ordinary share and per ADS. The Company believes that separate analysis and exclusion of the impact of (i) share-based compensation expenses, (ii) impairment loss of investments, and (iii) amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions (net of income taxes), add clarity to the constituent parts of its performance. The Company reviews these non-GAAP financial measures together with GAAP financial measures to obtain a better understanding of its operating performance. It uses the non-GAAP financial measures for planning, forecasting and measuring results against the forecast. The Company believes that non-GAAP financial measures represent useful supplemental information for investors and analysts to assess its operating performance without the effect of (i) share-based compensation expenses, and (ii) amortization of intangible assets from business acquisitions, which have been and will continue to be significant recurring expenses in its business, and (iii) impairment loss of investments. However, the use of non-GAAP financial measures has material limitations as an analytical tool. One of the limitations of using non-GAAP financial measures is that they do not include all items that impact the Company's net income (loss) for the period. In addition, because non-GAAP financial measures are not measured in the same manner by all companies, they may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies. In light of the foregoing limitations, you should not consider a non-GAAP financial measure in isolation from or as an alternative to the financial measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For more information on these non-GAAP financial measures, please see the table captioned "HUYA Inc. Unaudited Reconciliations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Results" at the end of this announcement.
Exchange Rate Information
This announcement contains translations of certain RMB amounts into U.S. dollars at a specified rate solely for the convenience of the reader. Unless otherwise noted, all translations from RMB to U.S. dollars are made at a rate of RMB6.7851 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate in effect on June 30, 2026, in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board. The Company makes no representation that the Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts referred to in this announcement could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.
Safe Harbor Statement
This announcement contains forward-looking statements. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "will," "expects," "anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates" and similar statements. Among other things, the quotations from management in this announcement, as well as Huya's strategic and operational plans, contain forward-looking statements. Huya may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its periodic reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), in its annual report to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about Huya's beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: Huya's goals and strategies; Huya's future business development, results of operations and financial condition; the expected growth of the live streaming industry and the game industry in Chinese mainland and internationally; Huya's expectation regarding demand for and market acceptance of its products and services; Huya's ability to retain and grow its user reach, broadcasters, talent agencies, business partners for game-related services and advertisers; Huya's ability to expand its product and service offerings; competition in the live streaming industry and game industry; Huya's efforts in complying with applicable data privacy and security regulations; fluctuations in general economic and business conditions in China; the economy in China and elsewhere generally; any regulatory developments in laws, regulations, rules, policies or guidelines applicable to Huya; and assumptions underlying or related to any of the foregoing. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in Huya's filings with the SEC. All information provided in this press release and in the attachments is as of the date of this press release, and Huya does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law.
For investor and media inquiries, please contact:
In China:
HUYA Inc.
Investor Relations
Tel: +86-20-2290-7829
E-mail: [email protected]
Piacente Financial Communications
Jenny Cai
Tel: +86-10-6508-0677
E-mail: [email protected]
HUYA INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All amounts in thousands, except share, ADS, per share data and per ADS data)
As of December 31,
As of June 30,
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
692,663
322,165
47,481
Restricted cash
12,031
29,671
4,373
Short-term deposits
3,125,760
2,130,908
314,057
Accounts receivable, net
238,569
407,019
59,987
Prepaid assets and amounts due from related
parties, net
290,747
280,388
41,324
Prepayments and other current assets, net
547,078
434,027
63,967
Total current assets
4,906,848
3,604,178
531,189
Non-current assets
Long-term deposits
-
760,000
112,010
Investments
296,165
344,617
50,790
Goodwill
453,498
439,439
64,765
Property and equipment, net
604,368
682,612
100,605
Intangible assets, net
127,633
106,309
15,668
Right-of-use assets, net
304,017
302,376
44,565
Prepayments and other non-current assets
8,843
19,045
2,807
Total non-current assets
1,794,524
2,654,398
391,210
Total assets
6,701,372
6,258,576
922,399
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
237,903
355,796
52,438
Advances from customers and deferred revenue
228,167
199,916
29,464
Income taxes payable
61,479
46,604
6,869
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities
1,032,437
832,984
122,764
Amounts due to related parties
150,166
123,954
18,269
Lease liabilities due within one year
18,982
11,651
1,717
Total current liabilities
1,729,134
1,570,905
231,521
Non-current liabilities
Lease liabilities
1,766
11,263
1,660
Deferred tax liabilities
18,932
16,766
2,471
Deferred revenue
31,824
37,480
5,524
Total non-current liabilities
52,522
65,509
9,655
Total liabilities
1,781,656
1,636,414
241,176
HUYA INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
(All amounts in thousands, except share, ADS, per share data and per ADS data)
As of December 31,
As of June 30,
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
Shareholders' equity
Class A ordinary shares (US$0.0001 par value;
750,000,000 shares authorized as of December
31, 2025 and June 30, 2026, respectively;
73,146,779 and 77,979,576 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and June
30, 2026, respectively)
54
58
9
Class B ordinary shares (US$0.0001 par value;
200,000,000 shares authorized as of December
31, 2025 and June 30, 2026, respectively;
150,386,517 and 150,386,517 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and June
30, 2026, respectively)
98
98
14
Treasury shares
(128,056)
(108,917)
(16,052)
Additional paid-in capital
6,466,101
6,230,982
918,333
Statutory reserves
122,429
122,429
18,044
Accumulated deficit
(2,219,365)
(2,233,576)
(329,188)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
678,455
611,088
90,063
Total shareholders' equity
4,919,716
4,622,162
681,223
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
6,701,372
6,258,576
922,399
*
For the avoidance of doubt, the total outstanding ordinary shares include 5,655,480 Class A ordinary shares beneficially owned by participants of HUYA Inc.'s share incentive plans.
HUYA INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(All amounts in thousands, except share, ADS, per share data and per ADS data)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2025
March 31,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2025
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Net revenues
Live streaming
1,153,232
1,100,993
1,101,472
162,337
2,291,383
2,202,465
324,603
Game-related services, advertising and others
413,857
627,393
637,863
94,009
784,291
1,265,256
186,476
Total net revenues
1,567,089
1,728,386
1,739,335
256,346
3,075,674
3,467,721
511,079
Cost of revenues(1)
(1,354,771)
(1,475,234)
(1,484,342)
(218,765)
(2,674,873)
(2,959,576)
(436,188)
Gross profit
212,318
253,152
254,993
37,581
400,801
508,145
74,891
Operating expenses(1)
Research and development expenses
(122,156)
(131,709)
(120,447)
(17,752)
(251,681)
(252,156)
(37,163)
Sales and marketing expenses
(57,699)
(88,067)
(90,988)
(13,410)
(118,394)
(179,055)
(26,389)
General and administrative expenses
(63,743)
(65,092)
(58,420)
(8,610)
(125,188)
(123,512)
(18,203)
Total operating expenses
(243,598)
(284,868)
(269,855)
(39,772)
(495,263)
(554,723)
(81,755)
Other income, net
7,577
2,927
7,847
1,157
11,111
10,774
1,588
Operating loss
(23,703)
(28,789)
(7,015)
(1,034)
(83,351)
(35,804)
(5,276)
Interest income
59,074
30,327
25,664
3,782
123,990
55,991
8,252
Impairment loss of investments
(30,000)
-
(12,475)
(1,839)
(30,000)
(12,475)
(1,839)
Foreign currency exchange losses, net
(2,112)
(1,703)
(2,782)
(410)
(2,528)
(4,485)
(661)
Income (loss) before income tax expenses
3,259
(165)
3,392
499
8,111
3,227
476
Income tax expenses
(7,388)
(2,631)
(1,817)
(268)
(10,636)
(4,448)
(656)
(Loss) income before (loss) income in equity
method investments, net of income taxes
(4,129)
(2,796)
1,575
231
(2,525)
(1,221)
(180)
(Loss) income in equity method investments,
net of income taxes
(1,362)
(1,271)
49
7
(2,039)
(1,222)
(180)
Net (loss) income attributable to HUYA Inc.
(5,491)
(4,067)
1,624
238
(4,564)
(2,443)
(360)
Net (loss) income attributable to ordinary
shareholders
(5,491)
(4,067)
1,624
238
(4,564)
(2,443)
(360)
HUYA INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(All amounts in thousands, except share, ADS, per share data and per ADS data)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2025
March 31,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2025
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Net (loss) income per ordinary share
—Basic
(0.02)
(0.02)
0.01
0.00
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.00)
—Diluted
(0.02)
(0.02)
0.01
0.00
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.00)
Net (loss) income per ADS*
—Basic
(0.02)
(0.02)
0.01
0.00
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.00)
—Diluted
(0.02)
(0.02)
0.01
0.00
(0.02)
(0.01)
(0.00)
Weighted average number of ADS used in
calculating net (loss) income per ADS
—Basic
227,675,862
229,705,246
229,420,912
229,420,912
228,554,238
229,562,293
229,562,293
—Diluted
227,675,862
229,705,246
232,687,370
232,687,370
228,554,238
229,562,293
229,562,293
**
Each ADS represents one Class A ordinary share.
(1)
Share-based compensation was allocated in cost of revenues and operating expenses as follows:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2025
March 31,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2025
June 30,
2026
June 30,
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Cost of revenues
3,707
2,435
1,563
230
7,090
3,998
589
Research and development expenses
6,563
4,437
4,025
593
12,876
8,462
1,247
Sales and marketing expenses
394
211
180
27
714
391
58
General and administrative expenses
7,385
13,512
12,191
1,797
15,433
25,703
3,788
HUYA INC.
UNAUDITED RECONCILIATIONS OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP RESULTS
(All amounts in thousands, except share, ADS, per share data and per ADS data)
Broadcom stále čeká ve fiskálním roce 2027 tržby z AI čipů přes 100 miliard USD. Růst táhne jen šest klíčových zákazníků, mezi nimi Google, Meta Platforms, Anthropic a OpenAI.
When Broadcom (AVGO -1.25%) reported fiscal second-quarter results in early June, CEO Hock Tan repeated the biggest number in the company's story. Broadcom, he told analysts on the earnings call, still expects fiscal 2027 AI semiconductor revenue "in excess of $100 billion." For perspective, the company's total revenue over the past 12 months (enterprise software included) was about $75 billion.
The growth behind that target isn't in doubt. Artificial intelligence (AI) semiconductor revenue reached $10.8 billion in the fiscal second quarter of 2026 (the period ended May 3, 2026), up 143% year over year.
What's less settled is who all that money comes from. Tan says six core custom-chip customers drive the business, and to me, that customer count is the number worth studying before paying today's price for the stock.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
A $100 billion promise Broadcom's fiscal Q2 was a record almost everywhere you look. Total revenue rose 48% year over year to $22.2 billion. Semiconductor solutions revenue climbed 79% to $15.0 billion, while infrastructure software revenue grew 9% to $7.2 billion. And free cash flow came in at $10.3 billion, or 46% of revenue.
The AI line is doing the pulling, and it's speeding up. A year earlier, quarterly AI semiconductor revenue was about $4.4 billion. In fiscal Q2 it hit a record $10.8 billion.
"The momentum continues and in Q3 we expect semiconductor revenue from AI to grow over 200 percent year-over-year to $16.0 billion," Tan said in the company's earnings release.
Chain those three periods together and you get an AI business that is accelerating, not settling down. Against that trajectory, a fiscal 2027 target bigger than the whole company's current annual revenue starts to sound less like a stretch and more like arithmetic.
Six buyers, most of the money Tan said on the June call that Broadcom has six core custom-chip customers, and Alphabet's Google unit, Meta Platforms, Anthropic, and OpenAI are among them. In December, Tan said Anthropic alone had placed a $10 billion order for AI chips.
A $100 billion-plus target spread across six core buyers works out to an average of more than $16 billion apiece in fiscal 2027.
And the list isn't broadening. Tan said the two core customers he doesn't name have placed purchase orders totaling $6 billion so far, with shipments starting late this year and accelerating into 2027.
That is the scale problem in one number: $6 billion would be a meaningful order book for almost any chipmaker, and it's about 6% of the fiscal 2027 target.
What could slow it down? Worth being clear about what management has and hasn't said here: Tan hasn't laid out a scenario where the forecast breaks. The concentration concern is my own, not one he raised.
But custom AI chips are capital projects. The six customers funding Broadcom's growth are all spending against the same AI build-out, on roughly the same clock. If even two of them paused their orders at the same time (because computing demand disappointed, or because a budget cycle turned), there's no long tail of smaller buyers underneath to absorb the hit.
A pause wouldn't even need to be dramatic. Tan himself noted on the call that the bookings coming in aren't for immediate delivery, and that customers still have other pieces to put in place before those chips can be delivered. A single delayed project could push billions of dollars of revenue into a later year.
Of course, some of the business doesn't ride that cycle. Infrastructure software, at $7.2 billion a quarter and growing 9%, is the steady piece of the company. And commitments from customers this large will likely take years to play out either way.
Today's Change
(
-1.25
%) $
-5.36
Current Price
$
422.40
Priced for the ramp At about $428 as of this writing, Broadcom trades at about 22 times the roughly $19.50 per share analysts expect the company to earn in fiscal 2027. Its price-to-earnings ratio on trailing GAAP earnings is about 71. The market, in other words, has moved on to next year's earnings -- the ramp Tan is promising is already baked into the price.
That's arguably a reasonable trade. After all, Broadcom has beaten its own AI forecasts repeatedly, and the fiscal Q3 outlook calls for the fastest AI growth yet.
But a $2 trillion valuation carried by six budgets is a different risk from a $2 trillion valuation carried by thousands of customers. The business is executing about as well as anything in the AI build-out. The customer list it depends on is short, and that is the risk I'd weigh most at this price.
Suncor Energy oznámila rekordní čtvrtletní peněžní tok z provozní činnosti ve výši C$5,3 miliardy a zvýší měsíční odkup akcií na C$500 milionů. Čistý dluh klesl na C$4,5 miliardy.
Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU) said its second-quarter results reflected the completion of major maintenance work and record cash generation, despite unusually severe weather that reduced mining productivity in the Fort McMurray region.
President and Chief Executive Officer Rich Kruger said record rainfall and snow melt during the quarter, with precipitation 50% above the 10-year average and the highest in more than 30 years, affected mining operations. The company estimated the weather reduced second-quarter production by 50,000 to 60,000 barrels per day.
Upstream production averaged 761,000 barrels per day in the quarter. However, Kruger said operations had returned to expected rates by late in the second quarter, with preliminary July production of about 870,000 barrels per day, which would represent Suncor’s second-highest July output on record.
Weather response and maintenance execution Management said it is incorporating lessons from the weather event into mine planning and operations. Measures include 48- and 72-hour weather outlooks, ore stockpiles in vulnerable areas, pre-securing materials and equipment such as gravel and graders, and using drones to monitor mine conditions in real time.
Peter Zebedee, executive vice president of upstream, said the company has also advanced its autonomous-haulage “mud mode” software. He said slippage events have fallen 80% from the initial version of the system.
Suncor completed a major Firebag turnaround involving its Plants 93 and 94, which together process roughly two-thirds of Firebag’s 250,000-barrel-per-day capacity. The company completed the work in 44 days at a cost of C$118 million, compared with 58 days and C$150 million for a similar turnaround in 2022.
Kruger said the turnaround’s production impact was 60,000 barrels per day in the second quarter, 25,000 barrels per day better than the company had planned. The work also extended the next planned turnaround cycle for the two plants to five years from four years historically.
At Base Plant, the U2 Coker turnaround was completed in 46 days, compared with 60 days in 2021, at a cost of C$203 million, down from C$225 million for the prior event. Commerce City refinery maintenance took 50 days, compared with 74 days in 2021.
The company said it remains on track to reduce annual turnaround capital by C$400 million, a target it raised on March 31. Suncor had originally targeted C$250 million in annual reductions over three years and said it reached that objective in two years.
Refining and sales set second-quarter records Upgrader utilization was 93% during the quarter following completion of Base Plant spring maintenance. Year-to-date utilization reached 94%, which Kruger described as a first-half record.
Refining throughput was 471,000 barrels per day, Suncor’s second-highest second-quarter level, while network utilization was 92% on its rerated 511,000-barrel-per-day capacity. Montreal and Edmonton, its two largest refineries, processed 151,000 and 161,000 barrels per day, respectively, with combined utilization of 99%.
Product sales reached a second-quarter record of 655,000 barrels per day, marking Suncor’s eighth consecutive quarter with sales exceeding 600,000 barrels per day. Jet fuel sales were a record 51,000 barrels per day as the company adjusted its product slate to capture global market value.
Dave Oldreive, executive vice president of downstream, said export capabilities built over several years helped drive sales. Through Burrard and Montreal, Suncor exported 56 cargoes during the first half, nearly matching the 58 cargoes it shipped during all of 2025.
Oldreive said the company increased its West Coast export capacity from three to four cargoes per month last year to five cargoes per month in early 2026, reaching six cargoes in May. In Montreal, Suncor developed a zero-cost logistics option to export jet fuel, enabling it to export 22,000 barrels per day in the second quarter. The company said it now has capacity to export about 25,000 barrels per day of jet fuel from Montreal if market conditions support it.
Cash flow, balance sheet and shareholder returns Chief Financial Officer Troy Little said adjusted funds from operations totaled C$5.3 billion, nearly double the prior-year level and equal to Suncor’s all-time quarterly record set in the second quarter of 2022. Adjusted funds from operations per share were C$4.52, nearly 20% above the comparable 2022 quarter, despite average WTI prices being about C$15 per barrel lower, according to Little.
Downstream adjusted funds from operations reached a record C$2.3 billion. Little said the company reported 89% margin capture, but said that excluding the impact of higher renewable volume obligation pricing, margin capture would have been 99%.
Net debt ended the quarter at C$4.5 billion, down 75% from the start of the decade. Suncor returned C$1.8 billion to shareholders during the quarter, including C$1.1 billion in share repurchases and C$706 million in dividends.
The company said it will raise its share repurchase program to C$500 million per month, or C$1.5 billion per quarter, beginning this week. That follows increases from C$275 million per month at the start of 2026 to C$350 million per month in April.
Little said Suncor intends to provide predictable shareholder returns through the commodity cycle while retaining flexibility for material changes in market conditions. He added that management continues to evaluate both dividends and buybacks to meet the preferences of different shareholders.
Second-half outlook and growth optionality Management maintained its upstream guidance and said it expects a stronger second half as major maintenance concludes. The company has one major upstream event remaining in the third quarter, a planned Syncrude coke outage expected to begin Aug. 20 and last 50 days. Downstream maintenance is also scheduled at Montreal and Edmonton.
Kruger said Suncor continues to prepare for potential future growth from its resource base, including work such as seismic activity and delineation drilling. However, he said the company has not shifted to an accelerated growth strategy and will remain disciplined in capital allocation.
Management also said it sees improved policy discussions in Canada following a non-binding memorandum of understanding between five oil sands companies and federal and provincial governments. Kruger said there is still substantial work required to convert those ambitions into definitive agreements and that Suncor’s outlook is not materially different from six months ago.
About Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU) Suncor Energy Inc is a Canadian integrated energy company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta. The company’s operations span the full oil and gas value chain, with principal activities in oil sands development and production, conventional exploration and production, refining, distribution and retail marketing of petroleum products. Suncor supplies crude, synthetic crude and refined fuels as well as related products and services to commercial and consumer markets.
Upstream, Suncor is a major developer and operator of oil sands projects in Alberta, using both mining and in situ technologies to produce bitumen and synthetic crude.
CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW – Get Free Report) announced that its Board of Directors has approved a share buyback plan on Monday, August 10th, RTT News reports. The company plans to buyback $500.00 million in outstanding shares. This buyback authorization permits the real estate investment trust to buy up to 15.7% of its shares through open market purchases. Shares buyback plans are typically a sign that the company’s management believes its stock is undervalued.
CoreCivic Stock Up 2.4% CXW stock opened at $33.06 on Tuesday. The stock’s 50 day simple moving average is $29.46 and its 200 day simple moving average is $23.02. CoreCivic has a fifty-two week low of $15.73 and a fifty-two week high of $34.86. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.86, a quick ratio of 1.32 and a current ratio of 1.32. The company has a market cap of $3.27 billion, a P/E ratio of 26.45 and a beta of 0.58.
Analysts Set New Price Targets A number of analysts have weighed in on CXW shares. Wall Street Zen upgraded CoreCivic from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Monday. Northland Securities set a $40.00 price objective on CoreCivic in a research note on Friday, June 26th. Benchmark upped their target price on CoreCivic from $41.00 to $45.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday. Noble Financial reaffirmed an “outperform” rating on shares of CoreCivic in a research note on Monday. Finally, Weiss Ratings upgraded CoreCivic from a “hold (c+)” rating to a “buy (b-)” rating in a report on Wednesday, July 1st. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating, According to MarketBeat.com, the company currently has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $37.00.
Get Our Latest Stock Report on CoreCivic
CoreCivic Company Profile Get Free Report)
CoreCivic, Inc (NYSE: CXW) is a real estate investment trust specializing in the ownership, management and operation of private correctional and detention facilities in the United States. The company enters into contracts with federal, state and local government agencies to house inmates and detainees in facilities that it owns or operates on a concession basis. In addition to traditional prison operations, CoreCivic provides specialized services such as community-based reentry programs, electronic monitoring and rehabilitation initiatives aimed at reducing recidivism.
CoreCivic’s portfolio encompasses a mix of adult correctional facilities, immigration detention centers, residential reentry centers and other community-based programs.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than CoreCivic SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for CoreCivic Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for CoreCivic and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEQuantum-Si (QSI) to Release Quarterly Earnings on Thursday
The Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD – Get Free Report) saw unusually large options trading on Monday. Investors purchased 70,402 call options on the company. This represents an increase of approximately 27% compared to the average volume of 55,491 call options.
Key Headlines Impacting Trade Desk Here are the key news stories impacting Trade Desk this week:
Positive Sentiment: Unusual options activity provided a limited bullish signal: traders purchased 70,402 call options, 27% above typical daily call volume. However, this does not necessarily indicate a change in the company’s fundamentals. Neutral Sentiment: CEO Jeffrey Green has continued buying shares, including approximately 6 million shares over the past six months. Investors are weighing that insider confidence against the stock’s steep decline and weaker business outlook. The Trade Desk Stock Opinions on Earnings Miss and Guidance Cut Negative Sentiment: The latest earnings report and third-quarter guidance disappointed investors. Revenue was reported at approximately $715.1 million, up only about 3% year over year, while the outlook pointed to further deceleration. The results raised concerns about weakening demand and limited near-term growth in programmatic advertising. Why The Trade Desk Shares Are Plunging Today Negative Sentiment: Analysts responded by cutting ratings and price targets. BNP Paribas Exane downgraded TTD to “underperform” with a $10 target, while DA Davidson lowered its target to $16 and maintained a “neutral” rating. Robert W. Baird, Evercore, BMO Capital Markets, and RBC also reduced their ratings or outlooks. Additional target cuts included $14 from Cantor Fitzgerald and $12 from Rosenblatt Securities. Why Is The Trade Desk Stock Falling on Monday? Negative Sentiment: The selloff has been more severe than declines among some advertising technology peers, suggesting investors view The Trade Desk’s earnings execution and growth profile as company-specific weaknesses rather than simply an industry-wide problem. Trade Desk Stock Is Falling Today Negative Sentiment: Institutional positioning also appears cautious, with more funds reducing holdings than adding shares in the latest quarter. This reinforces pressure on TTD as investors reassess its valuation and competitive moat. Trade Desk Stock Performance NASDAQ:TTD opened at $13.39 on Tuesday. The firm’s fifty day moving average is $18.62 and its 200-day moving average is $22.55. Trade Desk has a 52 week low of $12.83 and a 52 week high of $56.77. The firm has a market cap of $6.29 billion, a P/E ratio of 15.94, a P/E/G ratio of 0.67 and a beta of 1.04.
Analysts Set New Price Targets TTD has been the subject of a number of recent analyst reports. Wedbush set a $21.00 price objective on Trade Desk and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a research report on Friday, May 8th. Needham & Company LLC dropped their price target on shares of Trade Desk from $25.00 to $19.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Friday. HSBC lowered shares of Trade Desk from a “hold” rating to a “reduce” rating and set a $10.00 target price on the stock. in a report on Monday. Evercore cut Trade Desk from an “outperform” rating to an “in-line” rating and set a $13.00 price target for the company. in a report on Friday. Finally, KeyCorp downgraded shares of Trade Desk from an “overweight” rating to a “sector weight” rating in a research note on Friday, May 8th. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating, twenty-six have assigned a Hold rating and nine have assigned a Sell rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Trade Desk has a consensus rating of “Reduce” and an average target price of $19.33.
View Our Latest Stock Report on TTD
Insider Transactions at Trade Desk In other Trade Desk news, Director Samantha Jacobson sold 53,681 shares of the stock in a transaction on Thursday, May 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $21.14, for a total value of $1,134,816.34. Following the completion of the sale, the director owned 13,099 shares in the company, valued at $276,912.86. This trade represents a 80.38% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available through this link. Company insiders own 11.41% of the company’s stock.
Institutional Trading of Trade Desk Hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the stock. Brighton Jones LLC increased its stake in Trade Desk by 3.8% in the fourth quarter. Brighton Jones LLC now owns 4,586 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $539,000 after purchasing an additional 169 shares in the last quarter. Bison Wealth LLC boosted its holdings in Trade Desk by 24.3% during the fourth quarter. Bison Wealth LLC now owns 2,480 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $291,000 after purchasing an additional 485 shares during the last quarter. Woodline Partners LP boosted its stake in shares of Trade Desk by 75.5% in the 1st quarter. Woodline Partners LP now owns 5,275 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $289,000 after buying an additional 2,269 shares during the last quarter. Cerity Partners LLC grew its stake in Trade Desk by 46.6% in the 2nd quarter. Cerity Partners LLC now owns 59,785 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $4,304,000 after purchasing an additional 19,015 shares during the period. Finally, AXA S.A. increased its holdings in Trade Desk by 14.7% during the second quarter. AXA S.A. now owns 42,819 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $3,083,000 after buying an additional 5,487 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 67.77% of the company’s stock.
Trade Desk Company Profile (Get Free Report)
The Trade Desk, Inc (NASDAQ: TTD) is a technology company that provides a demand-side platform (DSP) for programmatic digital advertising. Its platform enables advertisers, agencies and other buyers to plan, purchase and measure ad inventory across digital channels, including display, video, mobile, audio, native and connected TV. By centralizing real‑time bidding, audience targeting and inventory access, the company aims to help clients optimize media spend and reach audiences at scale across publishers and ad exchanges.
Founded in 2009 by Jeff Green and Dave Pickles, The Trade Desk grew from a focus on programmatic display into a global ad‑tech provider.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Trade Desk SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for Trade Desk Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Trade Desk and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Cardinal Health, Inc. (NYSE:CAH) will release its fourth quarter earnings report before the opening bell on Tuesday, Aug. 11.
Analysts expect the Dublin, Ohio-based company to report quarterly earnings of $2.42 per share, up from $2.08 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Cardinal Health’s quarterly revenue is $65.11 billion. It reported $60.16 billion last year, according to Benzinga Pro.
On July 20, Cardinal Health announced plans to acquire the diabetes health business of Adapthealth and, in its entirety, Strive Medical for $360 million in cash.
Shares of Cardinal Health rose 0.3% to close at $237.18 on Monday.
Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.
Let’s have a look at how Benzinga’s most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.
Mizuho analyst Steven Valiquette maintained an Outperform rating and increased the price target from $235 to $240 on July 23, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 56%. UBS analyst Kevin Caliendo maintained a Buy rating and raised the price target from $260 to $274 on July 20, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 71%. TD Cowen analyst Charles Rhyee maintained a Buy rating and raised the price target from $255 to $275 on July 9, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 71%. B of A Securities analyst Allen Lutz maintained the stock with a Buy rating and raised the price target from $240 to $260 on July 2, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 55%. JP Morgan analyst Lisa Gill maintained the stock with a Neutral rating and cut the price target from $243 to $215 on May 4, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 56% Considering buying CAH stock? Here’s what analysts think:
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
ZoomInfo přesouvá své zaměření na enterprise zákazníky, přidává nové cenové balíčky a AI kredity a zároveň snižuje náklady. Ve 2. čtvrtletí vykázala volný peněžní tok 107 milionů USD, meziročně o 7 % více.
3 High-Yield Banks for Investors to Buy on the DipZoomInfo Technologies NASDAQ: ZI is prioritizing enterprise customers, expanding consumption-based pricing and restructuring parts of its business as it seeks a return to durable growth, Chief Financial Officer Graham O'Brien said at the KeyBanc Capital Markets Technology Leadership Forum.
O'Brien described ZoomInfo as a provider of data and software for business-to-business go-to-market professionals, including sales representatives and revenue operations teams. The company’s data asset includes more than 100 million companies and more than 500 million professionals, he said, along with billions of signals that are surfaced through artificial intelligence to help customers identify potential buyers and determine when and how to engage them.
Get ZoomInfo Technologies alerts:
Quarterly Results and Enterprise Momentum New York Community Bank stock plummets amid real estate risksO'Brien said ZoomInfo’s second-quarter results were generally above expectations, highlighting $107 million of unlevered free cash flow, up 7% year over year. He also pointed to year-over-year margin improvement after the company restructured its business and reduced its cost base during the quarter.
The CFO said ZoomInfo recorded one of its strongest quarters for new business involving customers spending at least $100,000 annually. The company attributed that performance to its focus on a dedicated enterprise account executive organization.
Banking and trucking: Is the economy rolling toward troubles?ZoomInfo began segmenting its sales organization roughly two years ago, according to O'Brien. The change involved accepting longer sales cycles, building buying committees within prospective customers and pursuing higher-value initial contracts that can later expand.
“You’re starting to see that,” O'Brien said of the strategy. “I think it started really catching, getting traction there about a year ago, but this was hit at full speed in Q2.”
The company has also increased specialization by industry, he said, assigning sales personnel more narrowly to verticals such as financial services or manufacturing rather than having them sell across several sectors.
AI, Data and New Pricing Plans O'Brien said ZoomInfo Copilot, the company’s AI product, has been in the market for more than two years and has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in annual contract value. Going forward, he said the company aims to increase consumption of both its data credits and AI credits through its own platform and through external integrations, including application programming interfaces and connections to platforms such as Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini.
ZoomInfo is moving toward a hybrid consumption model that can support customers using its products through software seats as well as customers using the company as a data and context layer for internally built applications.
The company’s Go-To-Market Studio gained traction in the second quarter after beginning its market rollout near the end of the first quarter, O'Brien said. ZoomInfo plans to introduce new pricing and packaging for new business at the end of the current quarter, followed by customer migrations later in the year and into 2027.
Under the new approach, customers will be able to access Studio, Copilot and ZoomInfo Marketing through a unified interface and apply purchased credits across a broader set of applications, O'Brien said. He added that the migration will not be mandatory, as some customers prefer seat-based pricing or specific products while others favor consumption models.
O'Brien pushed back on concerns that AI tools could diminish the company’s data advantage. He said most of ZoomInfo’s data is proprietary and argued that the ability to combine third-party data with customers’ first-party data creates an important context layer for AI-powered go-to-market activity.
Downmarket Pullback and Software Market Pressures ZoomInfo is intentionally reducing its emphasis on the downmarket segment, which represented 24% of the total business, O'Brien said. The company removed a substantial amount of downmarket sales resources in the second quarter and expects the segment to become closer to 20% of the business over the longer term.
Rather than relying on the segment as a major revenue contributor, ZoomInfo plans to pursue a more product-led approach with lower customer commitments and potentially lower price points, which O'Brien said could improve retention. He said downmarket customers remain valuable contributors to the company’s proprietary data asset.
Outside of software, ZoomInfo’s upmarket customers are performing well, O'Brien said. Software represents about 30% of the company’s total annual contract value, down from 40% at its peak five years ago. Gross retention among non-software upmarket customers has improved year over year, he said.
Software customers, however, have faced growing budget pressure. O'Brien said ZoomInfo began seeing more “build versus buy” discussions at the end of the first quarter, contributing to delayed purchases and downsells, particularly in the lower half of the upmarket segment. He said the environment has worsened as venture-backed and private-equity-backed software companies confront growth, profitability and financing challenges.
“I don’t expect software to get better anytime soon here,” O'Brien said.
Cash Flow, Capital Allocation and Margins O'Brien said free cash flow per share is an important measure of ZoomInfo’s operating economics. He said the company generated $1.20 in adjusted free cash flow per share last year and expects to exit the current year at a run rate of $1.25 per share.
He described ZoomInfo as a business with a $1.2 billion revenue run rate, approximately $740 million in annualized adjusted expenses after the restructuring, and annual debt service of between $55 million and $60 million.
In the second quarter, ZoomInfo broadened its capital-allocation approach beyond share repurchases to include debt repurchases, as some of its debt was trading at a significant discount to par. O'Brien said the company has no clear preference among debt repurchases, equity repurchases and reinvestment, adding that management believes it has the operating investments needed to support its product roadmap.
ZoomInfo’s adjusted gross margin is about 87%, O'Brien said. He said the company would be comfortable with the measure declining toward 85% if greater AI consumption produces higher gross profit, and added that cost discipline could help offset some margin pressure elsewhere in the business.
About ZoomInfo Technologies (NASDAQ:ZI)ZoomInfo Technologies Inc is a cloud-based software company specializing in business-to-business (B2B) intelligence and go-to-market solutions. Its platform aggregates firmographic, demographic, technographic and intent data to help sales, marketing and recruiting professionals identify, engage and close on high-value prospects. Subscribers gain access to a proprietary database of company and contact information, enabling targeted outreach and data enrichment across various workflows.
Founded in 2007 and headquartered in Vancouver, Washington, ZoomInfo has expanded its capabilities through both internal development and strategic acquisitions.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Should You Invest $1,000 in ZoomInfo Technologies Right Now?Before you consider ZoomInfo Technologies, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and ZoomInfo Technologies wasn't on the list.
While ZoomInfo Technologies currently has a Reduce rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI boom is creating opportunities across semiconductors, cloud computing, enterprise software, infrastructure, cybersecurity, and automation.
Inside this report, you’ll find 10 companies positioned to benefit as artificial intelligence moves from hype to real-world deployment and becomes a core growth driver for corporate America.
Zoetis se během pondělního obchodování propadl na nové 52týdenní minimum poté, co Piper Sandler snížila cílovou cenu z 90 USD na 80 USD a ponechala neutrální rating. Akcie se dotkly 71,45 USD.
Zoetis Inc. (NYSE:ZTS – Get Free Report)’s stock price hit a new 52-week low during mid-day trading on Monday after Piper Sandler lowered their price target on the stock from $90.00 to $80.00. Piper Sandler currently has a neutral rating on the stock. Zoetis traded as low as $71.45 and last traded at $71.8680, with a volume of 1784145 shares traded. The stock had previously closed at $72.66.
Several other equities analysts have also recently weighed in on the stock. William Blair reiterated a “market perform” rating on shares of Zoetis in a research note on Thursday, August 6th. UBS Group cut their target price on shares of Zoetis from $85.00 to $80.00 and set a “neutral” rating for the company in a research report on Friday. Weiss Ratings cut shares of Zoetis from a “sell (d+)” rating to a “sell (d)” rating in a report on Friday, June 12th. Citigroup decreased their price target on shares of Zoetis from $145.00 to $112.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research report on Monday, May 18th. Finally, TD Cowen dropped their price target on shares of Zoetis from $150.00 to $104.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Tuesday, June 30th. Seven analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating, nine have issued a Hold rating and one has given a Sell rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Zoetis presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus price target of $110.92.
View Our Latest Research Report on Zoetis
Insider Activity at Zoetis In other news, Director Frank A. Damelio purchased 6,650 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Wednesday, May 13th. The stock was acquired at an average cost of $75.39 per share, for a total transaction of $501,343.50. Following the completion of the transaction, the director directly owned 21,458 shares in the company, valued at $1,617,718.62. This trade represents a 44.91% increase in their position. The acquisition was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available through the SEC website. Also, Director Paul Bisaro acquired 2,000 shares of Zoetis stock in a transaction dated Wednesday, May 13th. The stock was purchased at an average cost of $75.88 per share, with a total value of $151,760.00. Following the completion of the purchase, the director owned 27,862 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $2,114,168.56. This represents a 7.73% increase in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this purchase is available in the SEC filing. Corporate insiders own 0.22% of the company’s stock.
Key Zoetis News Here are the key news stories impacting Zoetis this week:
Positive Sentiment: Zoetis exceeded second-quarter earnings expectations, reporting adjusted EPS of $1.87 versus the $1.85 consensus estimate. Its full-year 2026 EPS guidance of $6.15–$6.25 also provides an earnings framework for investors. Zoetis Earnings Call Reveals Growth Amid Headwinds Positive Sentiment: JPMorgan lowered its Zoetis price target to $115, but the target remains substantially above the stock’s recent trading level, suggesting the firm still sees potential upside. JPMorgan Chase Cuts Zoetis Price Target Neutral Sentiment: Piper Sandler cut its target from $90 to $80 and moved to a neutral rating. Although the revised target implies approximately 7% upside, the downgrade signals reduced conviction in Zoetis’s near-term performance. Piper Sandler Lowers Zoetis Price Target Neutral Sentiment: Market commentary is focused on whether Wall Street remains bullish or bearish, with the debate centered on Zoetis’s valuation, growth outlook and ability to overcome industry headwinds. Zoetis Stock: Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish? Negative Sentiment: Second-quarter revenue of $2.47 billion fell short of the $2.50 billion consensus and declined slightly year over year. Coverage also highlights competitive pressures and cautious guidance, weighing on expectations for renewed growth. ZTS Q2 Deep Dive Negative Sentiment: Zoetis is undergoing a finance leadership transition, with the incoming CFO also taking on COO responsibilities. Investors may view the expanded role as a sign of an effort to improve execution during a challenging period. Boards Expand CFO Mandates Negative Sentiment: Recent analyses ask what went wrong after Zoetis was previously viewed as a high-quality growth company, while an investment-manager letter noted underperformance relative to its benchmark. This reinforces concerns about slowing momentum and investor confidence. Zoetis Looked Like a Winner: What Went Wrong? Institutional Inflows and Outflows Several hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of ZTS. J. Stern & Co. LLP boosted its stake in shares of Zoetis by 12,431.2% in the fourth quarter. J. Stern & Co. LLP now owns 24,069,492 shares of the company’s stock worth $3,028,423,000 after acquiring an additional 23,877,416 shares during the period. Norges Bank purchased a new stake in shares of Zoetis during the fourth quarter worth about $734,425,000. Vanguard Group Inc. raised its stake in Zoetis by 12.9% during the 4th quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 47,780,974 shares of the company’s stock valued at $6,011,802,000 after purchasing an additional 5,474,210 shares during the period. Flossbach Von Storch SE bought a new stake in Zoetis during the 2nd quarter valued at approximately $302,601,000. Finally, BlackRock Inc. lifted its holdings in Zoetis by 10.8% in the 2nd quarter. BlackRock Inc. now owns 39,430,181 shares of the company’s stock worth $2,833,453,000 after purchasing an additional 3,845,869 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors own 92.80% of the company’s stock.
Zoetis Trading Up 2.7% The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.87, a quick ratio of 1.84 and a current ratio of 3.08. The company has a market capitalization of $31.28 billion, a PE ratio of 12.29, a PEG ratio of 1.21 and a beta of 0.73. The stock has a fifty day moving average of $76.60 and a 200 day moving average of $100.24.
Zoetis (NYSE:ZTS – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, August 6th. The company reported $1.87 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.85 by $0.02. Zoetis had a net margin of 27.49% and a return on equity of 74.89%. The business had revenue of $2.47 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $2.50 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the company earned $1.76 EPS. The business’s quarterly revenue was down .2% compared to the same quarter last year. Zoetis has set its FY 2026 guidance at 6.150-6.250 EPS. As a group, sell-side analysts predict that Zoetis Inc. will post 6.43 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Zoetis Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 1st. Stockholders of record on Monday, July 20th will be issued a dividend of $0.53 per share. This represents a $2.12 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 2.8%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, July 20th. Zoetis’s dividend payout ratio is 34.93%.
About Zoetis (Get Free Report)
Zoetis Inc (NYSE: ZTS) is a global animal health company that develops, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of products and services for companion animals and livestock. The company’s offerings include pharmaceuticals, vaccines and biologics, parasiticides and anti-infectives, as well as diagnostic instruments, consumables and laboratory testing services. Zoetis serves the veterinary community, livestock producers and other animal-health customers with products designed to prevent, detect and treat disease and to support animal productivity and welfare.
Zoetis traces its roots to the animal health business of Pfizer and became an independent, publicly traded company following a 2013 separation and initial public offering.
Featured Articles Five stocks we like better than Zoetis SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for Zoetis Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Zoetis and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEWestwater Resources Sees Unusually High Options Volume (NASDAQ:WWR)
NEXT HEADLINE »Dai Nippon Printing (OTCMKTS:DNPLY) Shares Gap Up on Better-Than-Expected Earnings
Toyota svolává v USA 508 354 vozů kvůli závadě displeje přístrojového štítu, která může zvyšovat riziko nehody. Týká se to některých modelů Camry Hybrid z let 2025–2026.
A man walks past the Toyota logo during a launch event in Mumbai, India, January 20, 2026. REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesAug 11 (Reuters) - Toyota (7203.T), opens new tab is recalling 508,354 vehicles in the U.S. as an instrument cluster that fails to display critical safety information increases the risk of a crash or injury, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Tuesday.
Here are some details:
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
The recall includes certain 2025-2026 Camry Hybrid vehicles.
A failure in the instrument cluster display during vehicle startup may deactivate the hazard lights, turn signals, seat belt warning system, and smart key reminder, the auto safety regulator said.
Dealers will update the display software, free of charge, the NHTSA added.
Preetika Parashuraman in Bengaluru; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Murielle Baker - Senior Communications Manager
Peter Beck - Founder, Chairman, President & CEO
Adam Spice - CFO & Treasurer
Conference Call Participants
Andres Sheppard-Slinger - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division
Jeff Van Rhee - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division
Trevor Walsh - Citizens JMP Securities, LLC, Research Division
Xin Yu - Deutsche Bank AG, Research Division
Jan-Frans Engelbrecht - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division
Erik Rasmussen - Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, Research Division
Benjamin Johnson - Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division
Kristine Liwag - Morgan Stanley, Research Division
Ryan Koontz - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division
Gautam Khanna - TD Cowen, Research Division
Edward Morgan - BTIG, LLC, Research Division
Michael Leshock - KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Research Division
Sujeeva De Silva - ROTH Capital Partners, LLC, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Rocket Lab Corporation Q2 Earnings Call. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions].
I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Murielle Baker.
Murielle Baker
Senior Communications Manager
Hello, and welcome to today's conference call to discuss Rocket Lab's Second Quarter 2026 financial results, business highlights and other updates. Before we begin the call, I'd like to remind you that our remarks may contain forward-looking statements that relate to the future performance of the company, and these statements are intended to qualify for the safe harbor protection from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
Any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and factors that could influence our results are highlighted in today's press release and others are contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such statements are based upon
Dynatrace uvedla, že AI workloady zvyšují poptávku po observabilitě a že zákazníci s AI využívají platformu asi 1,5× více než ne-AI kohorty. Společnost zároveň hlásí 41% organický růst nového ARR v 1. čtvrtletí.
Datadog Soars, Dynatrace Slumps: Gap Widens in AI Agent StocksDynatrace NYSE: DT CEO Rick McConnell said the observability market is entering a new phase as artificial intelligence workloads increase the need for monitoring, analysis and automation across enterprise technology environments.
Speaking at the KeyBank Technology Leadership Forum, McConnell said AI is not affecting all software categories equally, but he views observability as an “AI winner” because AI workloads require more oversight rather than less. Traditional observability has focused on business resilience, including whether software is running and meeting expected requirements. AI observability adds questions around whether an AI system’s outputs are accurate and based on the right information, he said.
Get Dynatrace alerts:
AI Raises the Importance of End-to-End Observability 3 Stocks Flashing Rare Buy Signals After the Market's Wildest MonthMcConnell said application performance management, or APM, is particularly relevant for AI observability because tracing is important for use cases such as large-language-model evaluation and experimentation. However, he said organizations also need a broader, integrated platform that combines traces, metrics, logs, real-user data and security-related information.
“The way to have confidence in your answers is by having the collection of all these domains using all data types,” McConnell said. He argued that enterprises can no longer effectively rely on separate vendors for APM, infrastructure monitoring, user monitoring, security and log management.
DTE’s Stargate Deal Turns Power Into ProfitsAccording to McConnell, integrated data can support increasingly automated operations. He described a process in which the Dynatrace platform identifies an incident, analyzes the cause, determines a triage plan and uses agents to execute actions. Organizations may choose to retain human review before agents act, he said.
McConnell added that the eventual goal is autonomous operations, particularly as AI agents are increasingly used to write code and enterprises manage a growing number of applications and infrastructure components.
Company Cites ARR, Log and Customer Acquisition Momentum McConnell characterized Dynatrace’s first-quarter performance as strong across the business. He said the company reported 41% organic net-new annual recurring revenue, or ARR, growth, exceeding the high end of its guidance across metrics.
While he cautioned that the company does not expect to deliver more than 40% net-new ARR growth every quarter, McConnell said the quarter supported Dynatrace’s outlook for ARR reacceleration. He described fiscal 2026 as a year focused on stabilizing ARR growth and fiscal 2027 as a year aimed at reaccelerating it.
McConnell identified three themes behind the quarter’s results:
Growing demand associated with AI workloads and AI-generated code. Rapid growth in log-management consumption. A record increase in new-logo ARR, which rose more than 160% year over year. On logs, McConnell said Dynatrace had previously targeted $100 million in log consumption during fiscal 2026. The company reached that level a few quarters ago and has since surpassed $200 million in log consumption, meaning consumption doubled within two quarters.
He said customers are often considering Dynatrace for existing, rather than new, logging workloads. Cost is a major driver, according to McConnell, who said enterprises have raised concerns over rapidly rising log costs. He also cited Dynatrace’s Bindplane acquisition, which he said enables inbound log filtering and can reduce the volume of logs that must be ingested and stored.
Platform Subscription Model Supports Broader Adoption McConnell said Dynatrace’s Platform Subscription, or DPS, has helped customers adopt the platform more broadly. Under the model, customers make an overall spending commitment and draw down that commitment based on their changing use of Dynatrace capabilities, rather than purchasing separate product-specific stock-keeping units.
DPS now represents 75% of Dynatrace ARR and is used by more than two-thirds of customers, McConnell said. He said the model can be particularly useful for customers whose usage varies by season, such as e-commerce companies that may need more observability during November and December.
As three-year DPS agreements come up for renewal, the company expects customer contract commitments to increasingly reflect consumption growth. McConnell said platform consumption continues to grow by more than 20%, compared with the company’s indicated 17% ARR growth inclusive of the Bindplane acquisition. He said the renewal cycle could support improved net revenue retention, particularly in the second half of the year.
Early AI Adoption Producing Higher Consumption McConnell said AI deployment remains in the “early innings,” but Dynatrace is already observing AI workloads for more than 1,000 customers. The company has deployed Dynatrace agents for actions such as automatic remediation and triage at more than 800 customers, he said.
Customers using Dynatrace for AI-related workloads are consuming the platform at a rate roughly 1.5 times that of non-AI cohorts, McConnell said, partly because AI systems generate substantial telemetry data.
He said Dynatrace sees several potential AI-related monetization avenues, including increased platform consumption, AI-observability capabilities and charges associated with agent actions. However, McConnell said the company has not incorporated those incremental monetization layers into its guidance because it is still unclear how quickly they will develop.
McConnell estimated that AI observability represents a $10 billion incremental category within an approximately $80 billion overall observability market, adding that the AI-observability segment is growing at an estimated 40% to 50% rate.
About Dynatrace (NYSE:DT)Dynatrace is a global software intelligence company specializing in application performance management (APM), cloud infrastructure monitoring, and digital experience management. Its flagship offering, the Dynatrace Software Intelligence Platform, leverages artificial intelligence to provide real-time observability across distributed environments, including on-premises data centers, private clouds, public clouds and hybrid deployments. Organizations rely on Dynatrace to detect anomalies, troubleshoot performance issues and optimize end-user experiences through automated root-cause analysis powered by the company's engine, Davis.
The Dynatrace platform comprises modules for full-stack application monitoring, digital experience monitoring, infrastructure monitoring and business analytics.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Should You Invest $1,000 in Dynatrace Right Now?Before you consider Dynatrace, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Dynatrace wasn't on the list.
While Dynatrace currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Learn the basics of options trading and how to use them to boost returns and manage risk with this free report from MarketBeat. Click the link below to get your free copy.
Five9, Inc. (NASDAQ:FIVN – Get Free Report)’s share price reached a new 52-week high during mid-day trading on Tuesday after DA Davidson raised their price target on the stock from $22.00 to $28.00. DA Davidson currently has a neutral rating on the stock. Five9 traded as high as $34.58 and last traded at $34.48, with a volume of 3074562 shares. The stock had previously closed at $33.99.
FIVN has been the subject of a number of other reports. Wall Street Zen lowered shares of Five9 from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Saturday. Cantor Fitzgerald raised their price objective on shares of Five9 from $32.00 to $34.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research report on Monday, August 3rd. Truist Financial lifted their target price on shares of Five9 from $23.00 to $35.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday. Rosenblatt Securities upped their target price on shares of Five9 from $29.00 to $32.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Friday. Finally, Needham & Company LLC reissued a “buy” rating and set a $40.00 price target on shares of Five9 in a report on Friday, May 1st. Ten investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and eight have assigned a Hold rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $31.50.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Report on Five9
Insider Buying and Selling In other news, EVP Panos Kozanian sold 5,869 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, June 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $24.81, for a total transaction of $145,609.89. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president owned 161,671 shares in the company, valued at $4,011,057.51. This trade represents a 3.50% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available at the SEC website. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Also, CRO Matthew E. Tuckness sold 8,645 shares of Five9 stock in a transaction dated Thursday, June 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $24.81, for a total value of $214,482.45. Following the completion of the sale, the executive directly owned 281,492 shares in the company, valued at $6,983,816.52. This trade represents a 2.98% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The SEC filing for this sale provides additional information. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Insiders sold a total of 85,820 shares of company stock worth $2,014,057 in the last 90 days. 1.20% of the stock is owned by company insiders.
Key Stories Impacting Five9 Here are the key news stories impacting Five9 this week:
Positive Sentiment: Five9’s quarterly results exceeded expectations, with earnings per share of $0.70 versus the $0.68 consensus and revenue of $312.44 million versus estimates of $306.61 million. Revenue increased 10.3% year over year, while the company issued third-quarter and full-year 2026 earnings guidance. Five9 Trading 14.9% Higher Following Better-Than-Expected Earnings Positive Sentiment: Evercore ISI initiated or reiterated a Buy rating on Five9, adding to the positive analyst sentiment around the company’s momentum and competitive position. Five9 Receives a Buy from Evercore ISI Positive Sentiment: Rosenblatt Securities reaffirmed its Buy rating, reinforcing the view that Five9’s growth prospects remain attractive. Rosenblatt Reaffirms Buy Rating Neutral Sentiment: Several analysts raised their price targets, including targets of $32 and $30, indicating improved estimates but limited additional upside at the current valuation. Five9 Price Target Raised to $32 Five9 Price Target Raised to $30 Negative Sentiment: DA Davidson raised its target from $22 to $28 and Robert W. Baird raised its target from $22 to $30, but both firms maintained Neutral ratings. Their targets remain below the recent share price, signaling caution after the sharp rally. DA Davidson Raises Five9 Price Target Robert W. Baird Raises Five9 Price Target Institutional Trading of Five9 Large investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Vanguard Group Inc. raised its holdings in shares of Five9 by 8.2% during the 4th quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 10,037,395 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $201,250,000 after acquiring an additional 759,237 shares in the last quarter. Van Berkom & Associates Inc. grew its holdings in shares of Five9 by 28.0% in the fourth quarter. Van Berkom & Associates Inc. now owns 3,596,380 shares of the software maker’s stock valued at $72,107,000 after purchasing an additional 787,626 shares in the last quarter. UBS AM A Distinct Business Unit of UBS Asset Management Americas LLC increased its position in Five9 by 10.3% in the third quarter. UBS AM A Distinct Business Unit of UBS Asset Management Americas LLC now owns 2,320,745 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $56,162,000 after purchasing an additional 217,227 shares during the last quarter. Anson Funds Management LP increased its position in Five9 by 35.6% in the first quarter. Anson Funds Management LP now owns 2,086,675 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $31,655,000 after purchasing an additional 547,304 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Geode Capital Management LLC raised its stake in Five9 by 1.9% during the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 1,996,382 shares of the software maker’s stock valued at $40,034,000 after purchasing an additional 37,261 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors own 96.64% of the company’s stock.
Five9 Trading Up 1.4% The company has a quick ratio of 4.51, a current ratio of 4.51 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.89. The stock’s 50 day moving average is $24.10 and its 200-day moving average is $20.03. The company has a market cap of $2.64 billion, a PE ratio of 49.97 and a beta of 1.42.
Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, August 6th. The software maker reported $0.70 EPS for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.68 by $0.02. Five9 had a net margin of 4.94% and a return on equity of 12.87%. The business had revenue of $312.44 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $306.61 million. During the same period last year, the company posted $0.76 EPS. The business’s revenue was up 10.3% on a year-over-year basis. Five9 has set its Q3 2026 guidance at 0.770-0.810 EPS and its FY 2026 guidance at 3.220-3.300 EPS. As a group, sell-side analysts anticipate that Five9, Inc. will post 1.39 EPS for the current year.
Five9 Company Profile (Get Free Report)
Five9, Inc (NASDAQ: FIVN) is a leading provider of cloud-based contact center software designed to help organizations manage customer interactions across voice, email, chat, social media and other digital channels. Its platform offers features such as intelligent routing, analytics, workforce optimization and integrated customer relationship management (CRM) connectors. The company emphasizes AI-driven capabilities, including virtual agents and predictive dialing, to enhance both agent productivity and customer experience.
Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Ramon, California, Five9 completed its initial public offering in February 2014.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Five9 SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for Five9 Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Five9 and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEValaris (NYSE:VAL) Shares Up 7.6% on Analyst Upgrade
NEXT HEADLINE »Everpure (NYSE:P) Stock Price Up 12.6% Following Analyst Upgrade
Talos Energy ve 2. čtvrtletí vykázala rekordní upravené volné cash flow ve výši 232 milionů USD a zvýšila celoroční výhled produkce po překonání výhledu.
Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) reported record adjusted free cash flow in the second quarter of 2026 as production exceeded guidance, while the offshore exploration and production company raised its full-year standalone production outlook and outlined progress on acquisitions, development projects and international expansion.
President and Chief Executive Officer Paul Goodfellow said oil production averaged about 69,000 barrels per day during the quarter, while total production averaged nearly 94,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. Both figures exceeded the company’s guidance expectations. Goodfellow said production optimization efforts, higher operational uptime and continued outperformance from the Cardona well supported the results.
“The second quarter was characterized by solid execution across our base business,” Goodfellow said, adding that Talos had achieved more than two-thirds of its 2026 target under its Optimal Performance Plan during the first half of the year.
Cash Flow, Guidance and Balance Sheet Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Zach Dailey said Talos generated approximately $402 million of adjusted EBITDA and a record approximately $232 million of adjusted free cash flow in the second quarter. The results were driven by production above guidance and crude-oil realizations that were stronger relative to WTI, he said.
The company increased its full-year 2026 standalone guidance to:
64,000 to 68,000 barrels of oil per day 87,000 to 91,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day The updated outlook excludes Talos’ pending Gulf of America bolt-on acquisition and includes the impact of a non-core, gas-weighted shelf divestment that closed early in the third quarter. Dailey said the base business was performing well enough to more than offset the production effect of the divestiture.
For the third quarter, Talos expects oil production of 61,000 to 65,000 barrels per day and total production of 81,000 to 85,000 BOE per day, also excluding the pending bolt-on transaction. The company expects to provide updated guidance after the acquisition closes, which it anticipates will occur later in the third quarter.
Cash on hand rose to about $578 million at the end of the second quarter, while total liquidity reached about $1.2 billion and the leverage ratio declined to 0.5 times, Dailey said.
Talos issued $800 million of 8% senior notes due 2034. The proceeds were used to redeem its $625 million of 9% notes due 2029 and fund a portion of the pending acquisition. The company also secured $150 million in incremental commitments from its bank group, increasing its credit-facility borrowing base to $850 million from $700 million upon the acquisition’s closing.
Dailey said Talos continues to expect pro forma year-end 2027 leverage below one times, in line with its long-term target. The company’s shareholder-return framework remains unchanged, with up to 50% of annual free cash flow targeted for share repurchases. Talos did not repurchase shares during the second quarter because of an acquisition-related corporate blackout period. Since announcing the framework in the second quarter of 2025, the company has returned about $135 million through buybacks and reduced its share count by about 7%.
Gulf of Mexico Operations and Pending Bolt-On Goodfellow highlighted the completion of the Genovesa workover, which returned the well to production ahead of schedule late in the second quarter and performed in line with expectations. During planning, Talos identified additional work that could support future access to a secondary zone, he said.
The company’s drilling and completion program has operated with approximately 50% lower nonproductive time than the Gulf of Mexico basin average year to date, according to Goodfellow.
At Monument, the first development well has been drilled and the operator is moving to the second well. Talos expects production from the project near the end of the year. The company also expects the first Brutus well to spud in the third quarter following rig reactivation activities. Its Daenerys appraisal program has begun, with results from the first appraisal well expected before year-end.
Talos contracted the West Vela rig for 12 months, with options beyond that term. Executive Vice President of Exploration and Development Bill Langin said the company expects to receive the rig around the middle of 2027, depending on the rig’s current operations. He said Talos kept pricing relatively close to previous levels by leveraging its existing relationship with Seadrill. Follow-on activity at Daenerys could be included in the rig program, although the contract is not dependent on that project alone.
On its pending Gulf of America acquisition, Goodfellow said BP elected not to exercise its preferential right. Talos will operate the Coulomb field and become a partner in the Na Kika platform and associated fields. The acquired assets produced approximately 18,000 BOE per day in the second quarter, according to Goodfellow, and are expected to be accretive to Talos’ average oil cut, unit operating expense and EBITDA margin.
Talos is evaluating an operated Coulomb drilling opportunity that could compete for capital in 2027. Goodfellow said the company aims to apply its strategy of pursuing lower-unit-cost, short-cycle tiebacks around acquired infrastructure.
Mexico and Honduras Expansion Talos also discussed its offshore Mexico farm-in and newly established offshore Honduras acreage position. In Mexico’s Block 29, the company and Repsol are the sole partners. The development-led opportunity is anchored by the existing Polok and Chinwol oil discoveries, and Talos is working toward submission of a field development plan to CNOOC and a targeted final investment decision in 2027.
Langin said the Block 29 partners are preparing for a potential exploration well late next year. The company sees the project as a Miocene-sand development opportunity similar to producing intervals on the U.S. side of the Gulf of Mexico. Talos said it has sufficiently high-quality seismic data and does not expect to add to its seismic inventory in the near term.
Goodfellow said the discoveries are entirely within the block, distinguishing the project from Talos’ Zama experience, where unitization resulted from a discovery extending onto a Pemex block.
In Honduras, Talos holds about 4 million acres of deepwater acreage and plans to begin the area’s first 3D seismic program in the second half of 2026. Langin said the company sees four to five exploration plays and expects to obtain an environmental permit to drill by year-end. Once received, the permit would start a two-year clock, giving Talos time to evaluate seismic results and decide whether to drill.
Goodfellow said Talos will continue to prioritize disciplined execution, investment in its base business, balance-sheet strength and shareholder returns while evaluating selective growth opportunities across its offshore portfolio.
About Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) Talos Energy Inc is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company headquartered in Houston, Texas. Founded in 2012 by industry veterans Tim Duncan and Jeremy Rights, the firm completed its initial public offering in 2021 and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol TALO. The company’s core operations focus on the acquisition, exploration, development and production of offshore hydrocarbon reserves, with a primary emphasis on the U.S. Gulf of Mexico basin.
Talos Energy’s asset portfolio spans deepwater and shelf opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico, where it holds interests in several producing fields and exploration blocks.
Celsius Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:CELH – Get Free Report) gapped down before the market opened on Monday after Stephens lowered their price target on the stock from $65.00 to $50.00. The stock had previously closed at $27.77, but opened at $26.31. Stephens currently has an overweight rating on the stock. Celsius shares last traded at $26.20, with a volume of 2,033,049 shares trading hands.
Other analysts have also recently issued research reports about the company. Roth Capital reiterated a “buy” rating and set a $48.00 price objective on shares of Celsius in a research report on Friday. Jefferies Financial Group reissued a “buy” rating on shares of Celsius in a research report on Tuesday, May 19th. Needham & Company LLC dropped their target price on Celsius from $55.00 to $35.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research report on Thursday, August 6th. Citigroup cut their price target on Celsius from $50.00 to $40.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research note on Friday. Finally, Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft reaffirmed a “buy” rating and set a $44.00 price target on shares of Celsius in a research report on Friday, May 8th. Nineteen research analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and six have given a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $50.50.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Report on Celsius
Insiders Place Their Bets In related news, Director Hal Kravitz purchased 8,400 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Friday, May 22nd. The stock was acquired at an average price of $29.73 per share, with a total value of $249,732.00. Following the completion of the acquisition, the director owned 227,158 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $6,753,407.34. This trade represents a 3.84% increase in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, CEO John Fieldly purchased 8,475 shares of Celsius stock in a transaction on Friday, May 22nd. The stock was bought at an average price of $29.36 per share, with a total value of $248,826.00. Following the transaction, the chief executive officer owned 937,540 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $27,526,174.40. This represents a 0.91% increase in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this purchase is available in the SEC filing. 2.33% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.
Celsius News Summary Here are the key news stories impacting Celsius this week:
Positive Sentiment: Stephens maintained an “overweight” rating while lowering its price target to $50, suggesting substantial potential upside if Celsius can stabilize its brands and improve execution. Stephens price target article Positive Sentiment: Alani Nu and Rockstar contributed to 10.6% year-over-year quarterly revenue growth, while Celsius remains viewed as a potential consolidation target for larger beverage companies. The buyout thesis is speculative and has not resulted in a reported offer. Energy drink consolidation article Neutral Sentiment: Celsius announced leadership changes as part of an organizational realignment supporting its “Total Energy Portfolio” strategy. The changes could improve integration and brand management, but investors will look for evidence of better results. Celsius leadership changes Neutral Sentiment: Analyst coverage remains mixed: JPMorgan, Citi, Piper Sandler and Needham lowered their targets, while Maxim downgraded the stock to “hold.” TD Cowen, however, retained a “buy” rating. JPMorgan price target article Negative Sentiment: Second-quarter revenue of $817.9 million missed the $870.1 million consensus estimate, and earnings of $0.36 per share fell short of the $0.41 forecast. Adjusted profitability was pressured even as Alani Nu and Rockstar grew. Celsius Q2 results analysis Negative Sentiment: The core Celsius brand reportedly shifted from 6% growth in the first quarter to a 12% year-over-year revenue decline in the second quarter, raising concerns that newer brands may not fully offset the slowdown. Celsius investigation notice Negative Sentiment: Levi & Korsinsky announced a pending investor investigation focused on Celsius’s disclosures and performance. The announcement is not a finding of wrongdoing, but it adds reputational and legal uncertainty. Investor investigation notice Institutional Inflows and Outflows Hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in the stock. Vanguard Group Inc. raised its stake in Celsius by 4.6% during the 4th quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 18,074,995 shares of the company’s stock worth $826,750,000 after acquiring an additional 802,743 shares during the period. Geode Capital Management LLC boosted its position in shares of Celsius by 8.4% in the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 3,565,409 shares of the company’s stock worth $163,112,000 after purchasing an additional 277,424 shares during the period. Norges Bank purchased a new stake in shares of Celsius in the fourth quarter worth $140,803,000. Massachusetts Financial Services Co. MA purchased a new stake in shares of Celsius in the fourth quarter worth $115,321,000. Finally, Ameriprise Financial Inc. raised its position in shares of Celsius by 20.9% during the 2nd quarter. Ameriprise Financial Inc. now owns 2,470,088 shares of the company’s stock valued at $114,587,000 after purchasing an additional 426,623 shares during the period. 60.95% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.
Celsius Stock Down 2.0% The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.56, a quick ratio of 1.42 and a current ratio of 1.80. The company’s 50-day moving average price is $29.35 and its 200 day moving average price is $36.27. The stock has a market capitalization of $6.89 billion, a P/E ratio of 113.38, a P/E/G ratio of 1.29 and a beta of 0.95.
Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH – Get Free Report) last issued its earnings results on Thursday, August 6th. The company reported $0.36 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.41 by ($0.05). Celsius had a return on equity of 36.52% and a net margin of 4.24%.The firm had revenue of $817.93 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $870.08 million. During the same period in the prior year, the company posted $0.47 EPS. The company’s quarterly revenue was up 10.6% on a year-over-year basis. As a group, equities analysts expect that Celsius Holdings Inc. will post 1.51 earnings per share for the current year.
Celsius Company Profile (Get Free Report)
Celsius Holdings, Inc is an American beverage company known for its line of fitness and energy drinks formulated to support active lifestyles. The company’s flagship product, the Celsius® brand, features beverages enhanced with ingredients such as green tea extract, guarana seed extract and essential vitamins, positioned as a functional alternative to traditional energy drinks. These products are designed to deliver a blend of ingredients that support metabolism and sustained energy without high sugar content or artificial preservatives.
In addition to its core carbonated drink portfolio, Celsius has expanded its offerings to include powder mixes and non-carbonated ready-to-drink variants, catering to consumer preferences around taste, convenience and nutritional needs.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Celsius SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for Celsius Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Celsius and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEBowman Consulting Group Sees Unusually Large Options Volume (NASDAQ:BWMN)
NEXT HEADLINE »Consensus Cloud Solutions (NASDAQ:CCSI) Trading 8.5% Higher After Analyst Upgrade
Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) will release its third quarter earnings report before the opening bell on Tuesday, Aug. 11.
Analysts expect the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based company to report quarterly earnings of 48 cents per share, up from 40 cents per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Aramark’s quarterly revenue is $4.94 billion. It reported $4.63 billion last year, according to Benzinga Pro.
On Aug. 5, Aramark’s board approved a quarterly dividend of 12 cents per share of common stock.
Shares of Aramark fell 0.4% to close at $55.71 on Monday.
Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.
Let’s have a look at how Benzinga’s most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.
Truist Securities analyst Jasper Bibb maintained a Buy rating and increased the price target from $58 to $70 on July 27, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 67%. Oppenheimer analyst Ian Zaffino maintained an Outperform rating and raised the price target from $60 to $65 on June 29, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 68%. Citigroup analyst Leo Carrington maintained a Buy rating and raised the price target from $63 to $70.5 on June 22, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 53%. B of A Securities analyst Gary Bisbee maintained the stock with a Buy rating and raised the price target from $59 to $62 on June 2, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 55%. Morgan Stanley analyst Toni Kaplan maintained the stock with an Equal-Weight rating and boosted the price target from $45 to $50 on May 13, 2026. This analyst has an accuracy rate of 61% Considering buying ARMK stock? Here’s what analysts think:
Photo via Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Mercury Systems (NASDAQ:MRCY – Get Free Report) will likely be posting its Q4 2026 results after the market closes on Tuesday, August 18th. Analysts expect Mercury Systems to announce earnings of $0.3850 per share and revenue of $266.1640 million for the quarter. Investors are encouraged to explore the company’s upcoming Q4 2026 earning summary page for the latest details on the call scheduled for Tuesday, August 18, 2026 at 5:00 PM ET.
Mercury Systems Stock Performance NASDAQ MRCY opened at $108.64 on Tuesday. The firm’s fifty day moving average price is $108.99 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $94.42. Mercury Systems has a 1 year low of $52.68 and a 1 year high of $128.45. The firm has a market capitalization of $6.52 billion, a P/E ratio of -452.67 and a beta of 0.95. The company has a current ratio of 3.19, a quick ratio of 2.15 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.40.
Analyst Ratings Changes A number of brokerages have recently weighed in on MRCY. Wall Street Zen lowered Mercury Systems from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Saturday, July 18th. Zacks Research downgraded shares of Mercury Systems from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, August 4th. Weiss Ratings restated a “sell (d-)” rating on shares of Mercury Systems in a research report on Friday, July 17th. Canaccord Genuity Group raised their target price on shares of Mercury Systems from $102.00 to $106.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, May 7th. Finally, The Goldman Sachs Group boosted their price target on Mercury Systems from $60.00 to $68.00 and gave the stock a “sell” rating in a report on Monday, May 11th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, three have issued a Buy rating, three have issued a Hold rating and two have issued a Sell rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat, the company presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $95.78.
View Our Latest Research Report on Mercury Systems
Insider Transactions at Mercury Systems In other Mercury Systems news, Director Howard L. Lance sold 9,250 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, May 26th. The shares were sold at an average price of $99.76, for a total value of $922,780.00. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink. 1.40% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.
Institutional Investors Weigh In On Mercury Systems Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently modified their holdings of the business. Hsbc Holdings PLC bought a new stake in shares of Mercury Systems in the 4th quarter valued at about $248,000. T. Rowe Price Investment Management Inc. grew its holdings in shares of Mercury Systems by 1.4% during the fourth quarter. T. Rowe Price Investment Management Inc. now owns 1,542,851 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $112,644,000 after buying an additional 21,182 shares during the last quarter. Invesco Ltd. increased its holdings in shares of Mercury Systems by 25.1% in the fourth quarter. Invesco Ltd. now owns 1,910,742 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $139,503,000 after purchasing an additional 383,299 shares during the period. Corient Private Wealth LLC increased its holdings in Mercury Systems by 171.5% in the 4th quarter. Corient Private Wealth LLC now owns 15,622 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $1,145,000 after buying an additional 9,867 shares during the period. Finally, Vident Advisory LLC increased its stake in shares of Mercury Systems by 2.9% in the fourth quarter. Vident Advisory LLC now owns 121,888 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $8,899,000 after acquiring an additional 3,382 shares during the period. 95.99% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Mercury Systems Company Profile (Get Free Report)
Mercury Systems, Inc (NASDAQ: MRCY) is a technology company that designs, manufactures and markets secure processing subsystems for aerospace and defense applications. The company’s products are built to address the stringent security, safety and reliability requirements of mission-critical programs, with a focus on radar, electronic warfare, intelligence and other sensor and processing functions. Mercury’s offerings encompass rugged embedded computing modules, high-performance radio frequency (RF) and microwave components, digital signal processing subsystems and secure networking solutions.
Since its origins in advanced signal processing, Mercury Systems has expanded its capabilities through a combination of internal development and targeted acquisitions.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Mercury Systems SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington
Receive News & Ratings for Mercury Systems Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Mercury Systems and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINEWeekly Research Analysts’ Ratings Updates for Global-e Online (GLBE)
NEXT HEADLINE »XOS (XOSWW) Expected to Release Quarterly Earnings on Thursday
Enterprise Products Partners ve 2. čtvrtletí vykázala rekordní EBITDA 2,8 miliardy USD a EPS 0,84 USD, nad odhady. Firma zároveň nabízí dividendový výnos 5,9 % a 28 let v řadě zvyšuje distribuci.
When it comes to energy investing, integrated oil giants like Chevron and ExxonMobil often steal the spotlight. They are top picks for dividend investors thanks to their impressive dividend growth streaks of 39 and 43 years, respectively.
While these integrated giants have impressive dividend histories, they don't offer the highest yield for income-focused investors. If you're searching for superior yields and stable cash flows, consider midstream powerhouse Enterprise Products Partners (EPD +0.64%). Here's why.
Image source: Getty Images.
Enterprise Products Partners is built for long-term stability While upstream oil drillers are vulnerable to price swings in commodity markets, Enterprise Products Partners serves as a highway system for moving oil and gas across North America. It has a massive infrastructure footprint that includes 50,000 miles of pipelines, 300 million barrels of liquid storage capacity, and 21 deep-water docks.
The business is built for stability. Roughly 80% of its gross operating margin is fee-based, and the company earns fees based on the volume of product moved rather than the spot price of oil and gas. Additionally, about 90% of its long-term contracts have escalation provisions to mitigate the effects of inflation. This business model helps shield it from price volatility, providing stable cash flows.
Today's Change
(
0.64
%) $
0.24
Current Price
$
37.99
In the second quarter, the company delivered stellar results, generating a record $2.8 billion in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), along with earnings per share (EPS) of $0.84, ahead of consensus estimates.
The strong results were boosted by robust global demand for U.S. energy, as total pipeline-equivalent volumes rose 8% to 14.7 million barrels per day (MMBPD), while marine terminal volumes surged 33% to 2.8 MMBPD across its docks. The company is building on its strong position, including several new processing plants in the Permian, a region that has been a massive growth driver for it.
Enterprise boasts an impressive track record of rewarding investors Enterprise Products Partners has an impressive dividend yield of 5.9%, well above Chevron's (3.7%) and ExxonMobil's (2.6%). This dividend is supported by a sound business and its corporate structure as a master limited partnership (MLP).
As a pass-through entity, Enterprise does not pay corporate income tax; instead, it passes profits, losses, and deductions directly to unitholders. While this provides great tax-deferral benefits, investors should note that they will receive a Schedule K-1 at tax time, which can complicate tax filing.
That said, Enterprise Products has an impressive yield and an exceptional track record of raising its distribution for 28 consecutive years, making it a solid dividend stock for investors seeking income from their investment portfolios today.
Offchain Labs uvede Stylus na Arbitrum One a Nova mainnet na Arbitrum Day, což má přinést vyšší výkon, nižší náklady na gas a lepší prostředí pro vývojáře. Zároveň chystá BoLD, Fast Withdrawals a další kroky k vyšší decentralizaci a interoperabilitě.
Tl;dr Your Chain, Your Rules. As Arbitrum sees massive adoption by those building applications, infrastructure, and Orbit Chains, we’re hard at work on a variety of technical updates. These updates ensure that the usability, interoperability, and utility of Arbitrum continues to lead the adoption curve. Outlined below is the roadmap we intend to deliver, making your vision of blockchains a reality.
Your Chain, Your Rules.
As we set our (technical) course for the upcoming year, we at Offchain Labs remain steadfast in one of our core values: Your Chain, Your Rules. We continue to believe that blockchains are building a better internet, one with users and developers at the core. Using Arbitrum technology, builders can create powerful onchain apps and vibrant blockchain ecosystems. Users and institutions can safely steward themselves in a natively digital economy. Communities have the power to self-govern.
With this in mind, we encourage everyone interacting with Arbitrum chains to be visionaries, to stay curious, and to move forward with confidence knowing the tech just works.
The Roadmap
When we launched Arbitrum on August 31, 2021 (Arbitrum Day), we tackled the first major hurdle in blockchain adoption: scalability. Over the past three years, we’ve continued to scale, introduced entirely new capabilities, and created the most technically sound and open blockchain platform available.
As blockchain technology expands its reach across industries and gives rise to new ones, builders and users face the very challenges we’re committed to solving: fundamental usability, driving adoption, offering robust decentralization guarantees to users, and an infrastructure layer that just works.
We’re bridging the gap for builders and users by simplifying interactions with Arbitrum chains, driving wider adoption. Interoperability is at our core, allowing seamless navigation between chains using secure technology. We’re abstracting complex decision-making processes about ‘which stack or chain to use’ and creating the unified system.
It’s simple…Your Chain, Your Rules — giving you the freedom to innovate and build on a foundation you can trust.
DevEx, UX, and Adoption
To drive adoption we need to make building on blockchains more expressive, performant, and accessible for developers. Enter Stylus.
Stylus transcends the constraints of building on Ethereum by allowing developers to program in languages that compile to WebAssembly (WASM), like Rust, C, and C++.
Solidity has an important part of our history and an important part of our future as well; Arbitrum’s support for EVM isn’t going anywhere. At the same time, we must recognize that the number of Solidity developers and the corpus of existing code is far smaller than traditional programming languages. Stylus allows us to be more inclusive and welcome in a growing developer base without compromising the EVM experience for those who love it.
Stylus meets the growing need for performant and secure smart contract languages, while simultaneously expanding the design space for increasingly expressive onchain applications. In addition, Stylus is an efficient execution environment leading directly to gas savings for complex smart contracts. With Stylus, computation and memory costs can be significantly cheaper.
And you don’t have to wait…
If you’ve been around the Arbitrum ecosystem for a while, you know some of the biggest ecosystem launches happen on Arbitrum Day. (Well ok ok technically, Arbitrum Day falls on a holiday weekend in the US this year, so we’ll be observing it a few days late).
Arbitrum Stylus will go live on Arbitrum One and Nova mainnet on Arbitrum Day ushering in a new phase of innovation across the ecosystem and make the developer and user experiences even better. It’s the biggest execution layer upgrade to ever hit our industry.
Decentralization
The core ethos of blockchain technology, which values decentralization and trustlessness, is core to everything we build at Offchain and our future development plans for the Arbitrum technology stack. We are working on a number of near-term and future developments to strengthen foundational infrastructure, ensuring decentralization remains not just a theoretical concept, but a practical reality in the ecosystem:
BoLD (H2 2024): In addition to improved security, BoLD enables safe decentralized validation and moves Arbitrum closer to being a Stage 2 rollup, the final stage in L2 Beat’s stage definitions.Censorship Timeout (H2 2024): Building upon BoLD, Censorship Timeout limits the negative impact to Arbitrum chains from a repeatedly censoring or offline sequencer, potentially due to an attack. This provides stronger guarantees of censorship resistance to Arbitrum chains, and improves user fund access.Decentralized Sequencer (likely 2025): Decentralizing the Arbitrum sequencer is the last step in Arbitrum’s decentralization roadmap. A decentralized sequencer distributes the responsibility of transaction ordering across a broader, decentralized network of participants, reducing the risk of censorship attacks and enhancing reliability.At Offchain, we believe in the core ethos of blockchain tech and build products for decentralized adoption. The features mentioned in this post can be adopted by Arbitrum Orbit chains when available, or the Arbitrum DAO can vote in any or all of these technical upgrades to the chains it governs (Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova).
Interoperability and Horizontal Scaling
The introduction of Arbitrum Orbit ushered in a new era, empowering teams to innovate solutions for their own specific use cases. Arbitrum Orbit allows developers to customize their chains in any way they see fit. Our guiding principle remains: Your Chain, Your Rules. As builders focus on pushing boundaries, we’re committed to implementing significant performance and interop improvements by tackling fundamental engineering challenges. Our long-term strategy combines vertical and horizontal scaling efforts, enabling developers to accomplish more.
To unify the Arbitrum Ecosystem (Arbitrum Orbit, Arbitrum One, Arbitrum Nova, and Ethereum) we’re building towards frictionless interoperability between chains rooted in fast communication. Optimistic rollups offer the lowest cost and greatest flexibility, but their main barrier to horizontal scaling is the confirmation delay introduced by the challenge period. Longer confirmation time means that worst-case cross-chain communication may require days or alternatively placing trust in 3rd-parties.
We’re working on several interop solutions that will reduce these confirmation delays and enable horizontal scaling:
Fast Withdrawals (Q3 2024):The imminent release of Fast Withdrawals will enable AnyTrust chains to bypass the confirmation delay, and settle to their parent chain within minutes. These fast confirmations will enable sibling L2s (or L3s) to communicate quickly with one another, thereby enabling developers to shard workloads and scale horizontally.Chain Clusters(2025): Looking ahead into next year, we plan to further expand the toolbox of developers to horizontally scale Orbit chains with the release of Chain Clusters. By allowing multiple Orbit chains to closely align their ecosystem and infrastructure, Chain Clusters can be used to reduce cross-chain communication time from minutes to near-instant.Performance and Efficiency
From the very beginning, back in 2014, Arbitrum’s design has focused on performance and efficiency. Now, we’re looking to deliver the next iteration of enhancements in compute efficiency and performance with fundamental optimizations to execution.
Multi-client support (H1 2025): Arbitrum Nitro is the node software that powers all Arbitrum-based chains and is built on Geth, a Golang implementation of the execution specification for L1 Ethereum. Since the debut of Arbitrum Nitro back in August 31, 2022, many new Execution Layer (EL) client implementations have launched or improved significantly — all with varying and unique value propositions and optimization targets. As the stability and quality of these alternative clients have improved, Offchain Labs has been working towards readying the Arbitrum stack to support alternative clients.When we evaluate other clients, our main objective is to optimize at-head block production speeds which over time will (1) reduce the hardware cost of existing node operators and (2) pave the way for the safe increase of the speed limit (i.e. target throughput) on Arbitrum chains.
We have already begun testing and evaluating performance and benchmarks for several clients including Paradigm’s newly released Reth 1.0, Erigon 3.0, and Nethermind with the goal of delivering a production-ready multi-client implementation in 2025 and streamlining the process of adding additional clients down the road. Although our current analysis suggests that some alternative clients are still behind Geth in a few performance benchmarks, we believe that it’s prudent to ready the path for Arbitrum adoption as these clients further optimize.
Adaptive Pricing (H1 2025): On current EVM chains, gas limits are set to prevent nodes from over-consuming the most scarce computational resource. This means that the gas limit for a chain is always a worst-case assessment, designed to protect against a transaction load that uses a node’s most constrained resource.In contrast with a worst-case approach, Adaptive Pricing considers the actual resources being used and dynamically sets the gas limit accordingly. With Adaptive Pricing, the chain will only raise fees and throttle down resource consumption when a particular resource is approaching its actual limit, as opposed to a hypothetical maximum of what resources a different transaction might have used.
Adaptive Pricing will further enable scaling by allowing smart contracts to more efficiently use the full resources made available by nodes, and operate much closer to the true gas limit. Overall performance will increase without increasing the capacity of the network’s nodes. Adaptive Pricing also improves resilience versus extreme traffic patterns (e.g. inscriptions), where usage patterns change radically, but temporarily, by dynamically lowering gas limits only when necessary.
Zero-knowledge proofs
Offchain is committed to scaling Ethereum with the best possible technology stack. By constantly working at the limits of available technology, we can identify improvements to deliver into our scaling solutions. While today it’s clear that from the perspectives of stability, maturity, cost, and security, Arbitrum Nitro is the best stack to scale Ethereum, our research team has identified several paths where we can incorporate productive uses of zero knowledge (ZK).
In his 2023 medium post as well as recent talks at EthCC and SBC, our Chief Scientist Ed Felten presented a hybrid construction for how ZK can be integrated into Arbitrum chains. One particular area of active research studying ZK:
ZK+Optimistic Hybrid Proving: In the Arbitrum rollup and dispute resolution protocol, ZK proofs could eventually be used to instantly confirm assertions, acting as an optional and fast path to confirmation on the parent chain. Optimistic proving could still be used if ZK proofs are not provided. This enables users and developers on Arbitrum chains to access very fast native interoperability on an as-needed basis.Always Looking Ahead
At Offchain we are committed to creating solutions before problems arise. The monumental efforts to build three products ready for deployment this year — Stylus, BoLD, and Timeboost (click to learn more) — are proof points of Offchain Labs our research team is leading from the front. These innovations will make blockchains more accessible and support core values of decentralization.
Our deep bench of researchers, engineers, product managers, partnerships, marketers, and operations professionals push the boundaries of what can be done in this space. We build our products for you to innovate with the assumption that your infrastructure just works.
There is a lot more on the roadmap, but we wanted to share some of the mountains you’ll start to see moving in the near term.
Arbitrum Orbit od spuštění v roce 2023 překročil 30 řetězců na mainnetu a má přes 200 milionů USD bridged TVL. Offchain Labs chystá další vylepšení v oblasti customizace, decentralizace a interoperability.
Unlock blockchain potential with the Universe of Chains
Blockchain technology has been rapidly evolving, bringing incredible opportunities for growth and innovation. However, as the space expands, developers and users are seeking ways to make blockchain technology more accessible, secure, and decentralized.
Arbitrum Orbit’s technology stack is an essential piece in blockchain scaling. Developers can create and customize their chains without getting bogged down in technical complexity, reducing the work they need to do to get to where they want to go. Users reap the benefits of faster, more cost-efficient transactions compared to using Ethereum.
At Offchain, we know that there are various types of onchain applications that developers want to build and that there is never a one-size-fits-all solution for enabling these applications and the innovation teams are striving for. Using Orbit, we have adopted the mantra of Your Chain, Your Rules to ensure chain developers can adapt and evolve their applications based on their unique needs and innovate in a way that works for them.
This means that regardless of whether developers are building a large-scale application or designing a dedicated ecosystem, Orbit will provide the developer with more ownership and customizability over the chain. This will include increased speed, custom gas tokens, governance tools, various validation strategies, novel ways to deal with MEV, smart contracts in new languages, and more. Each Orbit team will have the power to decentralize and grow however it wishes.
With all of this in mind, we want to share a little more about Arbitrum Orbit’s current state, our vision for its future, and what this means for current and prospective teams using Orbit chains.
Phase one, *rapid expansion*
Since its launch in 2023, Arbitrum Orbit has sparked an explosion in innovation across Ethereum. Pioneering blockchain developers quickly recognized the opportunity to build new, performant, and feature-rich rollups, resulting in industry-defining app chains and onchain ecosystems. As of October 1st, 2024, the Orbit ecosystem has seen over 30 chains reach mainnet, with over $200 million in TVL bridged.
The Orbit ecosystem contains the full breadth of blockchain applications and use cases such as gaming, DeFi, Consumer, DePin, RWAs, and more.
Applications that have built a solid user base and product are now evolving and require more bespoke designs and systems to serve their growing needs. This is what Orbit is designed to do. With Orbit, developers can aggregate their services into a single chain instead of dealing with the complexity of deploying across multiple blockchains. This allowed them to build faster, more scalable, and interoperable applications.
Phase two, the *evolution*
Following the explosion comes the evolutionary phase of the Orbit ecosystem, and we are looking to improve in a handful of areas over the coming months.
Customizability
Orbit chains are designed so that it is possible to choose the exact technology stack you would like to use. This means we want to provide more customizable offerings for Orbit chain users. Some exciting developments that we are working on include:
Expanding gas token offerings,Having the option to deploy a bridged form of USDC through EVM blockchains, with the possibility of having native issuance in the future andAccess to the new transaction ordering policy that Offchain developed, Timeboost.Decentralization
At the heart of what makes blockchain transformative is decentralization. BoLD, which stands for Bounded Liquidity Delay Protocol, will be an upgrade to the Arbitrum dispute protocol. It will enable anyone to validate the state of the chain and propose state roots to L1 Ethereum, making one great stride towards enhancing permissionless and decentralized validation and improving the security of withdrawals to L1 Ethereum.
As part of BoLD, a novel feature called Censorship Timeout will be enabled that improves the censorship resistance properties for Arbitrum Orbit chains — particularly L3s. Censorship Timeout introduces a way for the force inclusion window to be lowered following repeated or sustained sequencer censorship or downtime. Arbitrum Orbit chains get this benefit for free by adopting to use BoLD. Read more about this feature in this document.
DevEx
We want blockchain developers to be able to design and build highly customizable applications that meet their ever-changing needs. For this reason, we’re looking to offer flexible tools and a customizable tech stack to enable them to create more specialized and innovative solutions.
Alongside improvements to the Orbit Admin UI (user interface) and the Orbit SDK (software development kit), the Stylus SDK is another central area of focus for us at Offchain Labs.
Stylus enhances smart contract development on Arbitrum by allowing developers to write contracts in any language that compiles to WebAssembly, such as Rust, C, and C++. This flexibility lets developers use familiar, efficient, and secure programming languages while also allowing them to access tooling and libraries belonging to new languages supported by Stylus, unlocking new possibilities.
Native interoperability
As the universe of chains develops, native interoperability becomes essential. An important aspect of Orbit is its interconnectivity, which enables networks and services to flow effortlessly.
To help ensure that this becomes a seamless reality, we’re working on multiple interoperability solutions, including:
Layer leap: This feature will allow users to move funds directly from Ethereum to an L3 Orbit chain in one transaction. This helps with interoperability by reducing the number of transactions and overhead required from the end user when using app chains on L3s.Fast withdrawals: These will be available for Arbitrum AnyTrust chains. They will enable Orbit chains to reach fast finality and process transactions in as little as 15 minutes instead of the initial 7-day challenge period. This will be achieved through a committee that must unanimously approve the transaction. Fast withdrawals will help with interoperability because it reduces the time it takes to transfer assets between Orbit chains, making cross-chain interactions a tad more seamless.Chain mesh: Previously chain clusters. We are working on a native solution for Arbitrum chains to allow trustless, faster communication and settlement times. This innovative approach will enable Orbit chains to work together more efficiently, optimizing the use of resources and enhancing security.Performance
In addition to allowing developers to write code in additional programming languages, Stylus is designed to optimize performance by introducing a co-equal virtual machine completely interoperable with the EVM that is designed to execute WASM instead of EVM bytecode. WASM languages such as Rust can provide significantly better performance and efficiency for computationally intensive applications. This makes it possible to do previously unfeasible operations, such as various types of on-chain proof verification.
We are also looking to invest in alternative client implementations to scale Arbitrum Orbit chains vertically, bringing further customizations to Orbit chains and allowing further modularity.
Looking ahead
We envision that the future of Orbit chains will resemble closely connected constellations or meta-structures that bring together multiple blockchain networks into a cohesive, interconnected ecosystem. Arbitrum technology will connect these constellations and ensure they remain highly interoperable while serving a specific community or function.
With this roadmap, Arbitrum Orbit is well-positioned to lead the next phase of blockchain innovation, empowering developers, users, and ecosystems to thrive in an ever-evolving, decentralized world.
Victory Capital dosáhla nového 52týdenního maxima poté, co JPMorgan zvýšila cílovou cenu na 101 USD. Akcie během obchodování vystoupaly až na 110,37 USD.
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:VCTR – Get Free Report)’s stock price reached a new 52-week high during trading on Monday after JPMorgan Chase & Co. raised their price target on the stock from $87.00 to $101.00. JPMorgan Chase & Co. currently has a neutral rating on the stock. Victory Capital traded as high as $110.37 and last traded at $110.65, with a volume of 20430 shares trading hands. The stock had previously closed at $108.16.
A number of other equities analysts also recently issued reports on VCTR. Barclays upped their price target on Victory Capital from $95.00 to $112.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a research report on Friday. Zacks Research raised Victory Capital from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Friday, July 10th. Wall Street Zen upgraded Victory Capital from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Saturday, May 16th. The Goldman Sachs Group restated a “neutral” rating and set a $100.00 target price on shares of Victory Capital in a research note on Friday. Finally, Royal Bank Of Canada upped their target price on Victory Capital from $107.00 to $118.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research report on Friday. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, four have given a Buy rating and four have given a Hold rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Victory Capital presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $98.29.
Check Out Our Latest Research Report on VCTR
Key Victory Capital News Here are the key news stories impacting Victory Capital this week:
Positive Sentiment: Strong earnings and growth profile support the stock. Victory Capital recently reported adjusted earnings of $2.21 per share, well above the $1.79 consensus estimate, while revenue of $435.36 million also exceeded expectations. Zacks cited above-average financial growth as a reason growth investors may consider the shares. Here is Why Growth Investors Should Buy Victory Capital Now Positive Sentiment: Momentum remains strong. VCTR reached a new 52-week high, reflecting continued investor confidence after its earnings outperformance. The stock is trading substantially above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling strong recent price momentum. Victory Capital Hit a 52 Week High Neutral Sentiment: Insider share dispositions were tied to tax withholding, not discretionary selling. Victory Capital executives, including its CEO, CFO and ETF chief, had shares withheld or disposed of following the vesting of performance-based restricted stock. The transactions totaled sizable amounts, but the filings indicate they were administrative and non-discretionary rather than a direct signal that management expects the stock to decline. Victory Capital ETF Chief Share Vesting Negative Sentiment: Valuation may limit further gains. GuruFocus estimated VCTR’s GF Value at $97.67, below its recent market price near $111.44, suggesting the stock may be moderately overvalued after its rally. Investors may therefore demand continued earnings growth to justify the premium valuation. Victory Capital Valuation Review Institutional Inflows and Outflows A number of hedge funds have recently bought and sold shares of the stock. Amundi acquired a new position in shares of Victory Capital in the 4th quarter valued at $192,735,000. Bank of New York Mellon Corp acquired a new stake in Victory Capital during the 2nd quarter worth about $42,035,000. FIL Ltd acquired a new stake in Victory Capital during the 4th quarter worth about $26,813,000. Invesco Ltd. grew its stake in Victory Capital by 163.6% during the 3rd quarter. Invesco Ltd. now owns 431,912 shares of the company’s stock valued at $27,971,000 after purchasing an additional 268,061 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Voloridge Investment Management LLC grew its stake in Victory Capital by 747.2% during the 3rd quarter. Voloridge Investment Management LLC now owns 299,862 shares of the company’s stock valued at $19,419,000 after purchasing an additional 264,468 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 87.71% of the company’s stock.
Victory Capital Stock Up 3.0% The business has a fifty day moving average price of $92.36 and a two-hundred day moving average price of $80.32. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.41, a current ratio of 1.29 and a quick ratio of 1.29. The firm has a market capitalization of $6.97 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 20.49, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.26 and a beta of 1.08.
Victory Capital (NASDAQ:VCTR – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, August 5th. The company reported $2.21 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.79 by $0.42. Victory Capital had a return on equity of 24.17% and a net margin of 29.57%.The firm had revenue of $435.36 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $386.09 million. On average, equities analysts expect that Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. will post 7.38 earnings per share for the current year.
Victory Capital Announces Dividend The firm also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, September 25th. Investors of record on Thursday, September 10th will be issued a $0.50 dividend. This represents a $2.00 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.8%. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, September 10th. Victory Capital’s dividend payout ratio is 36.76%.
About Victory Capital (Get Free Report)
Victory Capital (NASDAQ:VCTR) is a global investment management firm that provides a broad range of strategies across equities, fixed income, multi-asset and alternative investments. Serving institutional, intermediary and retail clients, the company delivers tailored solutions through active, research-driven portfolio management. Its product lineup includes traditional mutual funds, separately managed accounts, sub-advisory services and specialized strategies such as ESG-focused and municipal bond portfolios.
Founded in 1988, Victory Capital has expanded its capabilities via both organic growth and strategic acquisitions, integrating experienced investment teams to enhance its offerings in areas like smart beta, global equity and fixed income.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Victory Capital SoundHound AI Sends a Loud Signal After Its Q2 Earnings Beat 3 Dividend Champion Utilities for a Market That Can’t Sit Still These 3 Most-Upgraded Stocks Have Almost Nothing to Do With AI First Solar’s Profit Engine Faces a New Policy Test in Washington Receive News & Ratings for Victory Capital Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Victory Capital and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
« PREVIOUS HEADLINELifeStance Health Group (NASDAQ:LFST) Sets New 1-Year High After Analyst Upgrade
NEXT HEADLINE »National Energy Services Reunited (NASDAQ:NESR) Sets New 52-Week High on Better-Than-Expected Earnings
V přiloženém textu nejsou žádné výsledky ani konkrétní novinky, jen úvod a právní upozornění k hovoru o výsledcích Hims & Hers Health za 2. čtvrtletí 2026.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) Q2 2026 Earnings Call August 10, 2026 5:00 PM EDT
Company Participants
William Newby - Senior Director of Investor Relations
Andrew Dudum - Co-Founder, Chairman & CEO
Mohamed ElShenawy - Chief Technology Officer
Yemi Okupe - Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Maria Ripps - Canaccord Genuity Corp., Research Division
Ryan MacDonald - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division
Mark Stephen Mahaney - Evercore ISI Institutional Equities, Research Division
Craig Hettenbach - Morgan Stanley, Research Division
Eric Percher - Nephron Research LLC
Glen Santangelo - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Hims & Hers Health Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the conference over to Bill Newby, Director of Investor Relations. Bill, please go ahead.
William Newby
Senior Director of Investor Relations
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Hims & Hers Health Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. On the call with me today is Andrew Dudum, our Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer; Yemi Okupe, our Chief Financial Officer; and Mo ElShenawy, our Chief Technology Officer. Before I hand it over to Andrew, I need to remind you of legal safe harbor and cautionary declarations.
Certain statements and projections of future results made in this presentation constitute forward-looking statements that are based on, among other things, our current market, competitors and regulatory expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary materially. We take no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement after this call, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions or otherwise.
The risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements are described in our earnings release and SEC filings. Please see our recent
Hexcel ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšil tržby o 8 % a provozní zisková marže vzrostla o 280 bazických bodů na 13,9 %. Firma zároveň zvýšila výhled tržeb i EPS na rok 2026.
SummaryHexcel Corporation demonstrates accelerating operating leverage, with Q2 sales up 8% and adjusted operating margin expanding 280 bps to 13.9%.HXL raises 2026 sales and EPS guidance, reflecting broadening commercial aerospace demand, particularly from Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 programs.Incremental margin reached 49% in Q2, and management targets mid-30% longer-term, as capacity is restored to meet rising demand.I downgrade from strong buy to buy, with a new price target of $125.31 (21% upside), as near-term upside moderates but multi-year margin and cash flow growth remain compelling.Looking for more investing ideas like this one? Get them exclusively at The Aerospace Forum. Learn More » Alvin Man/iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Hexcel Corporation (HXL), a leading provider of composite materials for the aerospace and defense industry, reported second-quarter 2026 results that confirmed the commercial aerospace recovery is finally translating into higher utilization, margins, and cash flow. High
24.45K Followers
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Samsung SDI ukončí společný podnik s GM v Indianě a odkoupí jeho 49,99% podíl kvůli slabší poptávce po elektromobilech. Závod má nově sloužit také pro baterie pro ESS.
The GM logo is displayed at the new location of the General Motors Headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., January 12, 2026. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
CompaniesAug 11 (Reuters) - South Korean battery maker Samsung SDI (006400.KS), opens new tab said on Tuesday it will end its joint venture agreement with General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab in Indiana and acquire the U.S. firm's 49.99% stake, citing weaker-than-expected electric vehicle demand.
Here are some details:
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Samsung SDI said in a regulatory filing that it plans to use the wholly owned unit - SDI-GM Synergy Cells Holdings - to respond to market demand for batteries across various applications, including energy storage systems (ESS) and EVs.
The company said its existing investment plan would change following the shift to a wholly owned unit, but specific investment plans had not yet been finalised. The company said it would make further disclosures in accordance with regulatory requirements.
"The ownership change was made in consideration of market changes since the joint venture was announced – including the slower-than-expected growth of EV demand. The two partners have now decided to seek other forms of cooperation other than the joint venture," Samsung SDI said in a statement.
Separately, Samsung SDI said it has signed an agreement with GM to jointly develop next-generation prismatic batteries for potential future EV applications.
Reuters had reported earlier this year that construction at the plant had slowed amid weak demand for EVs.
GM and other automakers pulled back on EV manufacturing following the loss of a $7,500 federal tax credit last September. While automakers continue to build and sell EVs, they have lowered factory output to match demand.
The joint venture was announced two years ago and was initially expected to have an annual production capacity of 27 gigawatt hours, with an aim to start mass production in 2027.
In March, GM and LG Energy Solution also announced a decision to transform another EV battery plant in Tennessee to make batteries for ESS.
Reporting by Anusha Shah in Bengaluru; Joyce Lee and Heekyong Yang in Seoul; Editing by Rashmi Aich, Sonia Cheema and Ed Davies
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
ČEZ za první pololetí zvýšil čistý zisk o 10 % na 18,1 mld. Kč a znovu navýšil celoroční výhled EBITDA na 109 až 114 mld. Kč, přičemž očištěný čistý zisk očekává na úrovni 31 až 35 mld. Kč.
Energetické skupině ČEZ klesly v letošním prvním pololetí provozní výnosy meziročně o pět procent na 159,7 miliardy korun, provozní zisk před odpisy (EBITDA) byl nižší dokonce o 20 procent a dosáhl rovných 59 miliard. Čistý zisk ale vzrostl o 10 procent na 18,1 mld. Kč, což je mj. dáno ukončením daně neočekávaných zisků, tzv. windfall tax. Čistý zisk očištěný, relevantní pro návrh dividendy, dosáhl 17,8 mld. Kč, což je meziročně o sedm procent více.
Společnost zároveň - stejně jako při květnovém reportování výsledků za první kvartál - opět navýšila svůj celoroční výhled, a to jednak díky zlepšení hospodaření segmentu Distribuce, vyššímu objemu výroby jaderných elektráren a růstu realizačních cen výroby v důsledku krize v Perském zálivu vedoucí k růstu tržních cen energetických komodit. Nově tak ČEZ očekává, že ukazatel EBITDA dosáhne 109 až 114 mld. Kč a čistý zisk očištěný bude na úrovni 31 až 35 mld. Kč.
Podle šéfa skupiny a předsedy představenstva Daniele Beneše to je důsledkem stabilního a bezpečného provozu našich výrobních zdrojů, zkrácení odstávek na jaderných elektrárnách a zlepšení výhledu segmentu Distribuce.
„Stabilitu a spolehlivost výrobních zdrojů i distribučních sítí chceme udržet i do budoucna. Tomu odpovídá růst investic. Celkem investice dosáhly 30 mld. Kč, což znamená meziročně 30procentní navýšení,“ dodal Beneš. Mezi hlavní investice skupiny aktuálně patří bezemisní zdroje, modernizace a posílení distribučních sítí a přípravy strategických energetických projektů.
Zdroj: ČEZ
Nyní ale ještě podrobněji k číslům hospodaření za první pololetí. Výroba elektřiny meziročně vzrostla o jedno procento na 26,1 TWh, a to především díky silnému druhému čtvrtletí, kdy vlivem situace na trzích vzrostla výroba v klasických elektrárnách. U výroby z jádra navíc došlo k menšímu poklesu, než se původně očekávalo, protože se podařilo zkrátit plánované odstávky v elektrárnách.
Distribuce elektřiny v distribučním území ČEZ Distribuce meziročně vzrostla o tři procenta na 17,8 TWh, klimaticky. Distribuce plynu na území skupiny GasNet byla vyšší dokonce o osm procent (36,8 TWh). Třemi procenty se projevilo chladnější počasí a zbývajících pět procent je důsledkem akvizice společnosti Gas Distribution, vysvětlil ČEZ v tiskové zprávě.
K založení nové dceřiné společnosti ČEZ Energy, kam se přesunou zákaznické segmenty skupiny, ČEZ uvedl, že aktuálně se připravuje oceňování jednotlivých dceřiných společností (znalecké posudky), analýzy pro rozhodnutí o finálním perimetru společností zahrnutých do ČEZ Energy a připravuje se optimalizace kapitálové struktury společností zákaznického segmentu.
„Převody firem zákaznických segmentů Skupiny ČEZ do ČEZ Energy proběhnou nejpozději do konce I. čtvrtletí 2027,“ uvedla společnost s tím, že představenstvo rozhodne, jaké společnosti zákaznického segmentu budou převedeny do ČEZ Energy a v jaké formě, rozsahu a s jakým načasováním k převodu dojde. Představenstvo taktéž rozhodne, v jakém rozsahu bude do ČEZ Energy převeden finanční dluh ze společnosti ČEZ, a. s.
Rocket Lab ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšil tržby o 62 % na 234,1 milionu USD a backlog o 137 % na 2,36 miliardy USD, přesto akcie po výsledcích klesly až o 7 % v after-hours obchodování. Důvodem je slábnoucí jistota, že raketa Neutron stihne start do konce roku.
Rocket Lab NASDAQ:RKLB delivered record revenue and backlog in the second quarter, yet its shares fell after earnings as investors focused on execution.
Revenue rose 62% to $234.1 million, while backlog jumped 137% to $2.36 billion. The company guided for third-quarter revenue of $250 million to $265 million, above Wall Street expectations.
Shares nevertheless fell as much as 7% in extended trading after management said the window for launching Neutron before year-end was narrowing.
Demand remains one of the strongest parts of Rocket Lab’s story.
Chief executive Peter Beck said the company had already entered into more than $1 billion of new launch and space-systems contracts in the third quarter.
Rocket Lab also ended Q2 with more than 90 launches in backlog, including US Space Force work.
Neutron is attracting customers before its first flight. Rocket Lab announced on Monday that Kepler Communications had booked a dedicated Neutron mission for no earlier than 2028.
Citizens analyst Trevor Walsh had argued before earnings that supplier checks showed healthy demand across the launch industry.
TipRanks reported that Walsh viewed Neutron as approaching a “key inflection point” and said successful execution could “raise the floor valuation” of Rocket Lab by removing a major uncertainty.
Rocket Lab still expects to deliver Neutron to its launch pad in the fourth quarter, but the maiden flight timetable has become less certain.
Beck said the “window for an end-of-year launch is narrowing.” CFO Adam Spice said the company would “hopefully” launch within the same period.
For investors, that distinction matters. Neutron is central to Rocket Lab’s attempt to move beyond the smaller Electron vehicle and compete for larger commercial, civil and national-security missions.
Walsh’s earlier thesis highlights the stakes. A successful first flight and consistent launch cadence could materially reduce execution risk. By the same logic, every delay keeps that risk alive.
Rocket Lab is prioritising reliability over hitting a calendar date, but the stock market is less forgiving when a company’s valuation already assumes years of rapid expansion.
Neutron timing was not the only reason for caution.
Rocket Lab remains unprofitable, posting a Q2 net loss of $49.3 million, or 8 cents a share. Free cash flow was negative $110.1 million, while its operating loss reached $57.5 million.
Third-quarter revenue guidance was strong, but management forecast GAAP gross margins of 29% to 31%, below the 37.6% analysts expected. Rocket Lab said a greater mix of lower-margin satellite platforms would weigh on profitability.
Analysts called the quarter solid and highlighted the stronger revenue outlook, but concluded that investors were likely “hoping for more”.
Rocket Lab is growing quickly and its backlog shows customers want what it is building, but investors still need is proof that those contracts can become reliable launches, stronger margins and eventually sustainable cash generation.
ČEZ za 2. čtvrtletí zvýšil tržby na 74,8 mld. Kč a očištěný čistý zisk na 4,3 mld. Kč. Zároveň zvýšil letošní výhled EBITDA i očištěného čistého zisku.
Pozn.: Čistý zisk a zisk na akcii jsou očištěné o mimořádné nehotovostní vlivy
ČEZ zvýšil letošní výhled EBITDA, resp. očištěného čistého zisku z intervalu 107 – 112 mld. Kč, resp. 30 – 34 mld. Kč na 109 – 114 mld. Kč, resp. 31 – 35 mld. Kč.
Jan Raška, analytik, Fio banka, a.s.
Související odkazy ČEZ: odhady hospodaření za 2Q 2026 Pražská burza na začátku týdne posiluje, začíná výplata dividendy ČEZ ČEZ: BM Pekao zvyšuje cílovou cenu ze 676 Kč na 1 380 Kč při novém doporučení „Hold“ ČEZ: Trigon Dom Maklerski zvyšuje cílovou cenu na 1 308,9 Kč a potvrzuje doporučení „Hold“ ČEZ bude se státem a Rolls-Royce SMR rozvíjet lokality pro výstavbu malých modulárních reaktorů
GCT Semiconductor vykázala ve 2. čtvrtletí tržby ve výši 1 mil. USD, meziročně o 18 % méně, protože se posunuly harmonogramy zákaznických implementací. Čistá ztráta se prohloubila na 20,4 mil. USD.
GCT Semiconductor NYSE: GCTS reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $1 million, down 18% from $1.2 million a year earlier, as the company continued its transition from 5G chipset development to commercialization. Management said customer deployment schedules shifted during the quarter, but it maintained that engagement and long-term demand for its technology remain intact.
Chief Executive Officer John Schlaefer said the company’s commercialization pipeline has broadened across three areas: terrestrial broadband, satellite and non-terrestrial connectivity, and industrial IoT and specialized networking applications. He said the company is seeking to reduce its dependence on any individual customer deployment by pursuing opportunities across multiple end markets.
Get GCT Semiconductor alerts:
“The primary variable today is deployment timing rather than customer interest,” Schlaefer said, adding that customer production schedules may shift as certification activities are completed and deployment plans are finalized.
Chipset Shipments Rise Sequentially GCT shipped more than 5,100 5G chipsets during the second quarter, a sequential increase of about 71% from the first quarter. Schlaefer said the shipments went primarily to four customers across four applications: fixed wireless access, aviation, mobile hotspots and push-to-talk phones.
During the question-and-answer session, Schlaefer said customer program delays were meaningful enough that the company had expected “significantly higher revenue” in the quarter. He attributed the timing changes to customers’ corporate restructuring and refocusing efforts in some cases, as well as external factors affecting launch schedules in others. He said the affected programs remain active and viable, with expected activity later in the year.
For the second half of 2026, GCT expects chipset shipments to exceed first-half levels, both in the quantity of chips shipped and the number of customers receiving them. However, management declined to provide specific shipment forecasts through the first quarter of 2027, citing variability in customer ramp schedules.
Focus on Broadband and Satellite Opportunities Schlaefer said the company sees the largest near-term revenue potential in terrestrial broadband and satellite and non-terrestrial connectivity, where it has been working on fixed wireless access and satellite programs for some time. He said these segments have substantial activity that has not yet ramped.
IoT and specialized networking represent the broadest set of potential applications, according to Schlaefer, including industrial, positioning, aviation and defense-related uses. He noted that average selling prices in IoT could be lower than in the fixed wireless and satellite markets.
After the quarter ended, GCT signed a customer in the unmanned aerial vehicle market, with potential consumer and defense applications. Schlaefer said the company’s technology can support control and telemetry functions. The customer has not yet announced its product, and GCT did not disclose its name due to confidentiality provisions.
Management also said it expects to disclose the identity of a satellite communications provider once that partner provides approval. Schlaefer said that could occur in the fourth quarter or the first quarter, depending on the customer’s launch plans.
Loss Widens on Warrant Liability Revaluation Second-quarter cost of net revenues rose 49% to $1.2 million from $800,000 a year earlier, largely due to higher unit volumes. The company reported a negative gross margin for the period, which Chief Financial Officer Edmond Cheng said was not representative of management’s expectations for future profitability. Cheng said margins are expected to improve as 5G product sales become a more significant portion of revenue.
Research and development expense fell to $3.3 million from $3.5 million, reflecting completion of a 5G chip design project and lower professional-services and stock-based compensation costs, partly offset by higher payroll-related expenses. Sales and marketing expense was $1 million, compared with $1.1 million a year earlier. General and administrative expense declined to $2.8 million from $3.4 million, primarily due to a lower loss related to changes in the allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable. Net loss widened to $20.4 million from $13.5 million in the prior-year quarter. Cheng said the latest result included a $12.3 million loss from changes in the fair value of common-stock warrant liabilities, driven by increases in the company’s common stock price and the market price of its publicly traded warrants.
Beginning this quarter, GCT is introducing adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental metric. Adjusted EBITDA loss improved slightly to $6.6 million from $6.7 million a year earlier. Cheng said the metric is intended to provide a view of operating performance excluding significant non-cash fair-value adjustments tied to warrant liabilities.
Liquidity and Production Capacity GCT ended the quarter with $30.2 million in cash and cash equivalents, along with $1.1 million of net accounts receivable and $1.5 million of net inventory. The company said it has secured wafer-production capacity for the remainder of 2026 and through the first quarter of 2027 in anticipation of expected chip demand.
Schlaefer said the wafer commitments are important in a tight foundry environment, but added that the company believes its capacity is appropriately sized. Because the wafers can support multiple product SKUs, he said a delay in customer ramps would not create a perishable inventory issue and the company could slow future purchases if needed.
Cheng said second-quarter cash burn was elevated by roughly $7 million to $7.5 million because the company prepaid supply-chain costs through year-end. Looking ahead, he said GCT anticipates quarterly cash burn of approximately $9 million to $9.5 million amid tight supply conditions, compared with an estimated $8 million to $8.5 million per quarter absent those conditions.
The company also amended its at-the-market equity program during the quarter, increasing maximum aggregate gross proceeds available under the program to $120 million from $75 million. The total share registration capacity remains $200 million.
About GCT Semiconductor (NYSE:GCTS)GCT Semiconductor Holding, Inc, operates as a fabless semiconductor company, designs, develops, and markets integrated circuits for the wireless semiconductor industry. The company provides RF and modem chipsets based on 4G LTE technology, including 4G LTE, 4.5G LTE Advanced, and 4.75G LTE Advanced-Pro. It also develops and sells cellular IoT chipsets for low-speed mobile networks such as eMTC/NB-IOT/Sigfox, and other network protocols; and 5G solutions. Its products and solutions are used in smartphones, tablets, hotspots, CPEs, USB dongles, routers, and M2M applications.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Should You Invest $1,000 in GCT Semiconductor Right Now?Before you consider GCT Semiconductor, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and GCT Semiconductor wasn't on the list.
While GCT Semiconductor currently has a Hold rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Click the link to see MarketBeat's list of seven stocks and why their long-term outlooks are very promising.