Image Credits:Brian Heater / TechCrunch Apple will announce a new smart home hub on Tuesday called the HomeView, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman.
Over the past couple of years, we’ve seen There have been multiple reports that Apple was working on a new smart home product, but now it seems the product has a name and a launch date. Gurman described the HomeView as a Siri-powered device with a display and an A18 chip, allowing customers to control their other smart home devices.
The HomeView will reportedly be available in two models — one designed for countertops and the other to be mounted on walls.
This would be Apple’s most serious bet on the smart home to date, after it failed to get much traction for its HomeKit software framework or its HomePod smart speaker.
Gurman reports that on Tuesday, Apple will also be unveiling updated versions of two other home devices, namely the Apple TV set-top box and the HomePod mini. Earlier this week, he said that Apple plans to announce a partnership with LG to create a smart lock, a thermostat, and a doorbell.
Tesla's (TSLA +2.05%) 486,532 vehicle deliveries in the third quarter exceeded Wall Street estimates, and the market responded positively. Still, the same thing happened with the big deliveries "beat" in the second quarter, only for second-quarter earnings to disappoint on the margin front. As such, the key metric to monitor in Tesla's upcoming earnings report is its gross margin. Here are the factors working for and against it.
The cleanest number to follow is Tesla's automotive gross margin excluding regulatory credits. The credits are variable and can't be treated as a run-rate item. The first chart below shows the sequential decline from Q1 to Q2. It was a disappointing result and raised concerns that Tesla's profit margins were in a structural decline, particularly concerning at a time when its free cash flow is negative.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
65/100
Today's Change
(
2.05
%) $
7.70
Current Price
$
382.70
Management discussed margin performance on the earnings call with analysts and in its Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. CFO Vaibhav Taneja discussed commodity price increases and rising subvention costs as interest rates have risen this year. Subvention costs are the costs of providing promotional financing for buyers, in other words, discounts.
In addition, in the SEC filing, Tesla noted: "Average cost per unit was relatively consistent due to unfavorable sales mix and a negative impact from the weakening of the United States dollar when compared to foreign currencies year over year," in the first six months. A "consistent" cost per unit is actually disappointing, considering Tesla sold 16% more vehicles in the first half of 2026 than in 2025, and unit costs should drop with increased deliveries/production.
Putting these facts together, it's understandable that investors are concerned with what Tesla's gross margin might be in the third quarter.
Data source: Tesla presentations. Chart by author.
Positive factors for Tesla's gross margin There are three factors potentially working in Tesla's favor and three working against it. On the plus side:
Tesla delivered slightly more vehicles in the third quarter than in the second (486,532 vs. 480,126), which, in theory, should lead to a lower cost per unit. Tesla delivered significantly fewer "other models" in the third quarter than in the second quarter (8,295 to 12,364), and these lower-volume models (including the S, X, Cybertruck, and Semi) are likely to be lower-margin. It's possible that the subvention costs (discounting) that hit margins in the second quarter were due to Tesla's aggressive inventory reduction. The chart below shows a large drop in days of supply in inventory between the first and second quarters, and a much more moderate drop between the second and third quarters. It's possible Tesla wasn't so aggressive in discounting in the third quarter.
Est = estimate. Data source: Tesla presentations. Chart and Q3 2026 estimate by author.
Three factors working against Tesla's margins On the other side of the argument:
Interest rates have risen throughout the year, so the cost of subvention was likely to be higher in the third quarter, all things being equal. It's unclear what was in the inventory Tesla cleared in the third quarter. If it were older, less valuable models, then it may have had to aggressively discount them and erode margins in the process. Pricing could be an issue, as Tesla may well be selling relatively more in geographies where it competes with price-competitive Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, rather than in the U.S.
Image source: Tesla.
What to expect in Tesla's report The primary question is whether gross margin will increase sequentially. However, the secondary question is whether any of the numbers that might cause it to fall reflect a larger trend? In other words, if gross margin declines again, is it a sign that Tesla's margins are structurally declining?
The first question will drive the market's reaction to the results, and the second will guide the long-term. My guess would be a slight decline, but long-term gross margins will improve as production scales up for the Y and 3, with the added value of Tesla's self-driving shining through as the robotaxi rollout expands significantly next year.
Amazon jedná o akvizici startupu zaměřeného na AI, Decartu, za 7 miliard USD, uvedl deník The Wall Street Journal. Dohoda zatím není potvrzena a jednání mohou ztroskotat.
Amazon is in talks to acquire Decart, a fast-growing artificial intelligence (AI) company. According to the WSJ, Amazon is planning to buy the company in a $7 billion deal, marking a big jump from its last funding round in May, which valued it at $4 billion.
Neither side has confirmed the deal, and according to the WSJ, talks could still fall apart or another suitor can come up.
The company has been growing fast, helped by the adequate capital from top venture capital firms like Sequoia Capital, Benchmark, Radical Ventures, Zeev Ventures, Nvidia, and Toyota Ventures.
Decart is creating software that makes it easier for developers to switch between different AI chips, a capability that has become more popular this year. It is also known for models that generate interactive video and simulated environments as one interacts with them. These models are known as Lucy and Oasis.
The potential acquisition comes a few months after Amazon Web Services gave Decart an early access to its Tranium chip. It was highly impressed by the founders, according to the WSJ.
The report comes at a time when Amazon is aiming to become a major player in various areas in the AI space. It is one of the biggest shareholders in Anthropic, a company that will launch an IPO at a $2 trillion valuation.
It has also built Tranium, its chips that it hopes will be bigger competitors to those made by Nvidia. Most importantly, Amazon is becoming a major infrastructure provider for companies in the AI industry. It is in the process of spending $220 billion in capital expenditure this year.
The report also comes at a time when large companies are scooping promising AI startups. As we reported earlier, Nvidia is in talks to acquire Reflection AI, a company that makes open-source AI models. If the deal goes through, it will be the biggest one it has executed. It recently announced a plan to acquire Hugging Face for $13 billion.
SpaceX recently acquired Cursor for $60 billion. Meta Platforms also made a bid for Manus, before abandoning it amid regulatory concerns. AMD recently acquired World Labs for $8.2 billion, while Stripe acquired OpenRouter for $7.2 billion.
AMD (AMD -2.03%) has had an incredible 2026. After notable surges earlier this year and another spike that kicked off in early September, the stock is up by more than 180% year to date.
However, 2026 is more than three-fourths over, and investors are starting to turn their gazes to 2027. I think history has a lot to say about what AMD investors can expect in 2027. Spoiler: It isn't good.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
It's hard to deliver great performances two years in a row After almost tripling its market cap so far this year, AMD is now nearly a trillion-dollar company. If it were to triple again, it would be worth about $3 trillion, and rank as the fifth-largest company in the world (assuming the other megacaps' values stay flat). However, I don't think that will happen.
If you look at AMD as a whole, and consider valuation, stock price movement, and business results, there's one item that stands out: valuation. AMD's valuation has flat-out gotten out of control for the growth it's delivering. Its forward price-to-earnings ratio has climbed to over 85. That ranks it among the most expensive stocks in the market, and far more expensive than its chipmaking peers.
AMD PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.
Take industry leader Nvidia (NVDA -0.52%), for example: It trades at just 26 times forward earnings. Broadcom (AVGO +0.39%), which makes custom AI chips, trades at 32 times forward earnings.
In each of their most recent quarters, the revenues of those chipmakers have grown faster than AMD's.
NVDA Revenue (Quarterly YOY Growth) data by YCharts. YOY = year over year.
So, why is the market awarding AMD such a major premium? I think it reflects that investors want something different from Nvidia. Nvidia has dominated the AI conversation and the data center accelerator space for a long time, and there was a bit of investment fatigue with the stock. Investors were looking for alternatives and found AMD. This helped spark a major rally through 2026 that left the stock incredibly expensive.
I'm not saying AMD stock will crash in 2027. However, I think there could be some declines toward the end of the year as investors take profits and reposition themselves into stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, which are delivering better growth in the same chip industry at far cheaper valuations. It will take a long time for AMD's business to grow into its current lofty valuation, which will hurt future returns.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
95/100
Today's Change
(
-2.03
%) $
-12.58
Current Price
$
608.10
The stock is rallying on use, not on new deals Perhaps one of the biggest fallacies driving AMD's stock upward has been the correlation between usage and success.
In 2025, AMD announced several deals with AI hyperscalers to provide them with hardware. It then did just as expected, and delivered computing units to OpenAI and Meta Platforms. Those processors are now being deployed, and are seeing major popularity as compute sources for products like Meta Muse. However, all that growth had already been accounted for in AMD's valuation before 2026 kicked off. The recent rally in the stock was driven by investors looking at the actual usage of AMD's chips, but it doesn't make a ton of sense for a stock to benefit twice from the same sales deals.
The chipmaker could ink more such deals, but the value of those may have been baked into the stock already at this point. This could cause AMD's stock to struggle in 2027, and I think history is pretty clear on what usually happens to a stock when it enters the year highly valued: It either tumbles to a reasonable valuation or stays flat as the business grows into its valuation. Neither option would be great for shareholders, which is why I think investors should find a different AI stock to invest in for 2027.
Keithen Drury has positions in Broadcom, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Meta Platforms, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Proti společnosti Hyliion Holdings (HYLN) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným klamavým informacím a obchodování insiderů ze strany vedení v období od 12. května do 23. června 2026.
NEW YORK, Oct. 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hyliion Holdings Corp. (NYSE: HYLN) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Hyliion securities between May 12, 2026 and June 23, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/cases/hyliion-holdings-corp-hyln-class_action_lawsuit.
Hyliion Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
(1) in order to cause rapid price appreciation in Hyliion stock, Defendants announced a deal with an entity that was very recently formed and does not appear to have any actual business operations;(2) Thomas Healy, the Company's Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Jon Panzer, the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO), timed the announcement and the foregoing price appreciation to insider trading; and(3) as a result, defendants' statements about Hyliion's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
What's Next for Hyliion Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/cases/hyliion-holdings-corp-hyln-class_action_lawsuit. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Hyliion you have until October 27, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Hyliion Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Hyliion Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Proti společnosti AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným zavádějícím informacím o financování, konkurenceschopnosti a pomalém přijímání služeb uživateli v USA a Japonsku; lhůta pro podání návrhu na jmenování hlavního žalobce je 13. listopadu 2026.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (NASDAQ: ASTS) between March 4, 2025 and July 15, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important November 13, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased AST SpaceMobile securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the AST SpaceMobile class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/ast-spacemobile-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 13, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) AST SpaceMobile's increasing capital requirements were likely to increase AST SpaceMobile's debt load and share dilution with greater frequency and at greater scale than defendants had signaled to investors; (2) accordingly, defendants had overstated the sufficiency of AST SpaceMobile's capital and liquidity position to achieve AST SpaceMobile's strategic and business goals; (3) defendants likewise overstated the durability of AST SpaceMobile's competitive position in the satellite D2C market; (4) even following the EchoStar Transaction, defendants continued overstating AST SpaceMobile's competitive position in the satellite D2C market; (5) AST SpaceMobile was experiencing slow user adoption in the U.S. and Japan; (6) the foregoing was likely to have a significant negative impact on AST SpaceMobile's business and financial prospects; and (7) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the AST SpaceMobile class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/ast-spacemobile-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/318381
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Investice 10 000 USD do společnosti USA Rare Earth by za rok klesla zhruba o 47 % na 5 300 USD, protože cena akcie se propadla přibližně z 26 USD na 14 USD.
October 2025 was arguably the best month for U.S. rare-earth stocks. Indeed, both of the top two rare-earth miners in the U.S. -- MP Materials (MP +0.00%) and USA Rare Earth (USAR -0.55%) -- were on an absolute tear, with both stocks up over 45% from the start of the month to Oct. 14, 2025. The geopolitical climate looked favorable to rare-earth companies, China was tightening its grip on critical minerals, and the White House appared dead-set on building a domestic rare-earth supply chain.
What could go wrong, right?
Fast-forward to today, and rare-earth stocks have not delivered on the sky-high expectations investors have had for them. Both MP Materials and USA Rare Earth are down year over year as I write this, as is the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX +0.64%).
Although all three are in the red, USA Rare Earth has taken the biggest hit. In fact, an investment in USA Rare Earth last October would have been cut in half.
Image source: Getty Images.
A $10,000 investment in USA Rare Earth would be worth this much today On Oct. 6, 2025, the closing price for USA Rare Earth was about $26. Today, one year later, USA Rare Earth is trading for about $14 a share as I write this. Put differently, a $10,000 in USA Rare Earth stock would be worth about $5,300 today, a loss of roughly 47%.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
50/100
Today's Change
(
-0.55
%) $
-0.07
Current Price
$
12.56
What happened? Well, USA Rare Earth was riding a wave of investor enthusiasm last October. The Department of Defense had recently invested $400 million in MP Materials, and China was tightening restrictions around rare-earth exports. True, the former bit helped its rival more than itself, but news of Washington's broad support of the rare-earth industry lifted both companies on Wall Street.
At the same time, USA Rare Earth had just appointed Barbara Humpton, former CEO of Siemens USA, as its new CEO last September. Humpton revealed that the company was in talks with the White House, which fueled speculation that USA Rare Earth would receive federal support next.
Things were looking good. Then, things started going south.
In late October, the U.S. and China reached a trade truce that paused China's newest rare-earth export restrictions. All of a sudden, much of the urgency that had shaped USA Rare Earth's bull case had lost its tension.
Meanwhile, investors were waking up to just how much USA Rare Earth would need to turn its mine-to-magnet ambitions into a thriving business. Indeed, this was especially clear in January 2026, when USA Rare Earth raised $1.5 billion by selling around 70 million new shares.
Is USA Rare Earth worth a large investment today? I wouldn't put a big investment into USA Rare Earth today. Mining is an expensive business, and even with federal support in its back pocket, USA Rare Earth has a long way to go before it will produce rare-earth magnets. In the meantime, plenty of factors could derail its ambitions or limit its growth, not the least of which is the enormous amount of capital required to build mines and magnet factories.
At this point, most investors would probably be better off with a rare-earth exchange-traded fund (ETF) that holds shares of multiple companies rather than investing directly in USA Rare Earth.
Rare-earth elements are crucial components for modern technologies, including defense systems. After decades of aggressive state subsidies and price undercutting, China controls 70% of rare-earth element extraction and 90% of processing, according to research from The Motley Fool.
USA Rare Earth (USAR -0.55%) is one of the companies looking to break China's dominance by establishing a fully integrated, Western-based "mine-to-magnet" supply chain independent of China.
Building an end-to-end industrial network from scratch is a big undertaking, and USA Rare Earth has made some massive investments in the last year, including a $2.8 billion acquisition of Brazilian miner Serra Verde and another $1.2 billion investment in its South Carolina facility to process rare earths. Here's which investment matters more, and the role each plays in USA Rare Earth's mine-to-magnet strategy.
Image source: Getty Images.
USA Rare Earth is investing massively as it builds its domestic "mine-to-magnet" business On Sept. 4, USA Rare Earth completed its $2.8 billion acquisition of Brazilian miner Serra Verde Group. The acquisition makes USA Rare Earth the only producer of scale for all four magnetic and heavy rare-earth elements outside Asia and gives it immediate access to the upstream feedstock it needs to produce permanent magnets.
But that is only half of the equation. USA Rare Earth aims to be fully integrated across the value chain, including extraction, separation, alloying, and magnet manufacturing.
The company currently operates a facility in Stillwater, Oklahoma, where it manufactures sintered NdFeB permanent magnets that combine light rare-earth elements (neodymium and praseodymium) and heavy rare-earth elements (dysprosium and terbium) with iron and boron.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
50/100
Today's Change
(
-0.55
%) $
-0.07
Current Price
$
12.56
In addition to its Oklahoma facility, USA Rare Earth broke ground on Sept. 9 on a $1.2 billion, 800,000-square-foot facility in Blacksburg, South Carolina. Once it becomes operational, the facility will aim to produce 6,400 metric tons of magnets and 5,000 metric tons of alloy annually. It will be a crucial part of management's larger goal of 10,000 metric tons per annum of domestic magnet capacity by 2029.
Which investment matters more for USA Rare Earth? Western nations urgently need to diversify their supply of rare-earth elements and permanent magnets used in many modern technologies, and USA Rare Earth will play a key role in helping them do so. The U.S. government has already committed $1.6 billion to help the company scale up, underscoring the urgency of securing these crucial materials.
As for its investments, the $2.8 billion Serra Verde acquisition is crucial to helping USA Rare Earth secure the much-needed feedstock for permanent magnets. Without it, the company would have to wait years for its Round Top project to come online.
Looking ahead, USA Rare Earth will have its hands full integrating Serra Verde, scaling its manufacturing capabilities, and developing its Round Top project. If it succeeds, USA Rare Earth could become a top domestic producer of these important permanent magnets, but investors should brace for volatility along the way.
Centrus Energy's (LEU +0.25%) stock closed at a 52-week high of $464.25 per share on Oct. 16, 2025. Today, it trades at about $143. Let's see why this nuclear energy stock shed 69% of its value -- and if its growing backlog makes it a contrarian investment today.
What does Centrus do? Centrus is one of the few U.S. companies licensed to sell low-enriched uranium (LEU), the most commonly used fuel in commercial nuclear reactors. It's also the only public U.S. company that produces high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) for next-gen nuclear reactors.
Image source: Getty Images.
Centrus originally enriched its own LEU on a commercial scale, but it shut down its aging plants 13 years ago when it became cheaper to import and resell LEU from overseas to U.S. utilities. But over the past few years, the sanctions against Russia and the U.S. drive toward energy independence prompted Centrus to restart its domestic enrichment strategy.
Centrus began producing HALEU in the U.S. three years ago and aims to restart its LEU enrichment operations in Ohio by the end of the decade. By the end of the second quarter of 2026, its total backlog of LEU and HALEU orders had swelled to $4.5 billion. That's equivalent to 9.5 times its projected revenue for 2026.
Today's Change
(
0.25
%) $
0.35
Current Price
$
142.44
Why did Centrus' stock pull back? Centrus might initially seem a no-brainer play on the resurgent nuclear market, which is benefiting from new decarbonization initiatives and the growth of the cloud and AI markets.
But from 2025 to 2028, analysts expect Centrus' revenue to decline from $449 million to $443 million, while its net income slides from $78 million to $50 million.
Centrus' backlog is robust, but it won't convert most of those orders into revenue until the late 2020s and the 2030s. The U.S. will also fully ban Russian uranium imports by 2028, before Centrus can fully restart its domestic enrichment operations at a commercial scale. Those delays and supply constraints will likely throttle its near-term revenue growth.
At the same time, Centrus must increase its capex to accelerate its domestic enrichment plans. That pressure will squeeze its near-term earnings, while rising interest rates will make it more expensive to issue fresh debt. All of those challenges caused its stock to pull back, but it still looks expensive at 50 times next year's earnings.
Centrus' stock should eventually recover after it completes its capital-intensive transformation, but it doesn't look like a bargain yet. Investors who want to profit from the nuclear market's growth should probably stick with safer and more diversified stocks instead.
Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Nová peněženka otevřela na Hyperliquid dlouhou pozici s 3× pákou v hodnotě 24,42 milionu STRK a za méně než den vykázala nerealizovaný zisk 1,056 milionu USD.
Kripto piyasasında yeni oluşturulan bir cüzdan, Starknet (STRK) işlemiyle dikkat çekti. Cüzdan sahibi, dün 24,42 milyon STRK için 3x kaldıraçlı long pozisyon açtı. Yaklaşık 2,9 milyon dolar değerindeki işlem, kısa sürede 1 milyon doların üzerinde gerçekleşmemiş kâra ulaştı.
Zincir üstü verileri paylaşan Lookonchain’e göre pozisyonun kârı 1,056 milyon dolar seviyesinde. Ancak bu tutar henüz kesinleşmiş kazanç değil; işlem açık kaldığı sürece STRK fiyatına bağlı olarak değişebilir.
STRK İşleminde 1 Milyon Doları Nasıl Kazandı? Paylaşılan işlem verilerine göre cüzdan, Hyperliquid üzerinde STRK için 3x kaldıraçlı long pozisyon açtı. İşlemde toplam 24,42 milyon STRK bulunuyor ve pozisyonun güncel değeri yaklaşık 2,91 milyon dolar.
Pozisyonun giriş fiyatı 0,07603 dolar olarak görünürken Starknet fiyatı 0,11929 dolara yükseldi. Token fiyatındaki bu hareket, kaldıraçlı pozisyondaki kârı da büyüttü.
Ekrandaki verilere göre işlem şu anda yaklaşık 1.056.440 dolar gerçekleşmemiş kâr taşıyor. Böylece yeni cüzdan, bir günden kısa sürede 1 milyon doları aşan bir kâra ulaşmış oldu.
Starknet Fiyatı Düşerse Ne Olur? Pozisyonun büyüklüğü kadar tasfiye seviyesi de dikkat çekiyor. İşlem ekranında STRK long pozisyonu için tasfiye fiyatı 0,064481 dolar olarak gösteriliyor.
3x kaldıraç, STRK yükseldiğinde getiriyi artırırken fiyat ters yönde hareket ettiğinde zararı da büyütebilir. Tasfiye fiyatına yaklaşılması halinde pozisyon zorunlu olarak kapatılma riskiyle karşılaşır.
Burada önemli ayrım, 1 milyon doları aşan tutarın gerçekleşmiş kâr değil, açık pozisyondaki kazanç olması. Cüzdan sahibi pozisyonu kapatmadığı sürece fiyat hareketleri bu tutarı değiştirebilir.
STRK işlemi, kısa sürede büyük kazanç sağlayan kaldıraçlı pozisyonların ne kadar hızlı büyüyebildiğini gösteriyor. Ancak pozisyonun açık kalması, mevcut kârın korunacağını garanti etmiyor.
Bu içerik genel piyasa verilerine dayanır ve yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Kendi araştırmanızı yapmanızı öneririz.
Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
Singapurský měnový úřad (MAS) zařadil Hyperliquid na seznam upozornění pro investory, protože decentralizovaná struktura platformy podle regulátora spadá mimo jeho dohled. Provozovatel platformy, Hyperliquid Labs, potvrdil, že je registrován v Singapuru a nemá licenci MAS.
Singapore has built a reputation as one of the friendlier places on earth for digital assets. That friendliness, it turns out, has limits.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has voiced serious concerns about decentralized crypto products. It is paying particular attention to highly leveraged perpetual futures platforms, and it has now named one of the biggest of them.
On June 26, 2026, MAS added Hyperliquid to its Investor Alert List. The platform is operated by Hyperliquid Labs, which is registered in Singapore.
What MAS actually flagged MAS uses its Investor Alert List to flag entities to the public. Hyperliquid landed there because of its decentralized structure, which the regulator considers to sit outside its oversight.
The regulator also pointed out that Hyperliquid is not regulated in any major jurisdiction.
Hyperliquid Labs has confirmed it is registered in Singapore. It has also stated that it is not licensed by MAS.
Advertisement
Why perpetual futures are the pressure point Perpetual futures, or “perps,” are derivatives that let traders bet on an asset’s price without ever holding it. Unlike traditional futures, they have no expiry date, so positions can stay open indefinitely.
Consumer advocates have described leveraged perps platforms as “the most dangerous product in crypto.”
MAS has been careful to draw a line here. It distinguishes the institutional perpetual futures offered on SGX, Singapore’s exchange, from what Hyperliquid offers. The regulator’s message is that the product type alone is not the issue. Who is trading it, under what rules, and with what protections is what counts.
MAS has also stressed that crypto trading carries high risks for the general public.
The “techno-anarchism” problem A Bloomberg opinion piece captured the broader mood among regulators. It described growing apprehension about the “techno-anarchism” of recent crypto products.
The Hyperliquid case shows how awkward this gets in practice. A company is registered in Singapore, yet the product it is associated with operates in a way MAS says falls beyond its reach.
Singapore’s balancing act MAS continues to champion tokenization and institutional activity in the sector while focusing on curbing the risks that come from retail speculation.
Singapore’s framework requires digital token service providers serving overseas clients to obtain a license. Approvals under the 2025 regulations have been limited.
MAS Managing Director Chia Der Jiun has emphasized trust and risk management in recent remarks. He has highlighted the intersection of AI and digital asset trading as an area needing attention.
What this means for traders and platforms The most immediate effect is reputational. An investor alert from a respected regulator is not a ban, but it is the kind of label that compliance teams, banks and institutional partners tend to notice.
The research findings suggest MAS’s stance could signal a more cautious posture among global regulators. If so, similar decentralized perps platforms may face increased scrutiny elsewhere.
By separating SGX’s institutional perps from Hyperliquid’s offerings, MAS is effectively endorsing one model of leveraged trading while warning against another.
Disclosure: This article was edited by John Chen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Společnost Strategy Inc. drží 848 000 BTC v hodnotě 70,48 miliardy USD a podle Michaela Saylora se připravuje na další nákup prostřednictvím alternativních zdrojů financování.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Michael Saylor is back in action ahead of the new trading week in financial markets. On October 11, 2026, the head of Strategy Inc. posted a fresh treasury chart featuring 117 purchase dots and his favorite phrase: "There's always room for more orange."
The company officially controls 848,000 BTC worth a staggering $70.48 billion, accounting for 4.04% of all Bitcoin in existence. But the most interesting part remained behind the scenes: the post appeared just as the treasury was restructuring its financing strategy ahead of another purchase.
You Might Also Like
HOT Stories
The reason is that during the week of October 5–9, Saylor's main fundraising instrument, STRC preferred shares, fell below their $100 par value and remained stuck in the $99.43–$99.66 range.
There’s always room for more orange. https://t.co/hndZf0Acp7
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) October 11, 2026 At that point, the company's strict internal algorithm kicked in. When the security trades below par, the system automatically activates the "Buyback Zone."
Issuing new shares to purchase cryptocurrency is prohibited. Instead, the company must spend money buying back its own discounted securities to support their price. The result for the week through this channel was exactly 0.00 BTC.
Where Saylor gets the money to buy BitcoinSaylor does not say there is always room for more Bitcoin for no reason. The message is clear: a technical pause in one instrument will not stop the entire buying machine. The treasury has already learned to work around its own restrictions by relying on other credit lines, with the overall system totaling $12.69 billion.
While STRC was on the defensive, another class of securities, STRF, traded firmly above par at $103.98 and served as a source of liquidity. The latest targeted purchase of 334 BTC at $85,838 per coin demonstrated this clearly: the company has money even without STRC.
You Might Also Like
The average purchase price across the company's entire portfolio currently stands at $75,436 per Bitcoin. With the current price above $83,000, Saylor is sitting on a solid profit. The market values the company's net assets at a slight discount, with mNAV Basic at 0.92x, but forced share buybacks offset this.
Saylor's latest post signals that alternative channels are operational, funds have been accumulated, and the company is theoretically fully prepared for the next wave of purchases.
Liquid Network obnovila provoz, ale výběry L-BTC za BTC zůstávají pozastavené, dokud rezerva nebude plně krýt všechny L-BTC v oběhu a nebudou dokončeny bezpečnostní kontroly.
The Liquid Network is running again, but nobody can cash out. Peg-outs, the process of turning Liquid Bitcoin (L-BTC) back into real Bitcoin, remain suspended while the sidechain’s reserve sits about 603 BTC short, according to The Defiant.
Liquid says redemptions will not return until the reserve fully backs every L-BTC in circulation and its security reviews are complete.
How a software bug drained the reserve The trouble began on September 6, 2026. A bug in Elements, the software that powers Liquid, allowed someone to create and redeem L-BTC without authorization.
Approximately 3,996 to 4,000 BTC left the federation reserve. That haul was valued at around $320 million at the time.
The federation reserve had held roughly 4,205 BTC before the exploit. At the worst point of the crisis, it was down to just 197 BTC.
White-hat actors returned roughly 3,400 BTC by September 7, about a day after the drain.
That recovery still left between 598 and 603 BTC unreturned. Around mid-September, the reserve was reportedly covering about 86% of outstanding L-BTC supply.
The signing keys held by federation members were not compromised. Neither was SideSwap’s Peg-out Authorization Key.
What is working and what is not Liquid restarted normal block production and user transactions on September 10, 2026. People can send and receive L-BTC inside the network again.
As of October 11, 2026, peg-outs remain on hold. Liquid has tied a restart to several conditions.
Full restoration of 1:1 BTC backing for L-BTC Upgrades to the Elements software Completed security audits Changes to key management, notably a move to cold storage Blockstream CEO Adam Back has assured stakeholders that the 1:1 peg will ultimately be covered. No specific date for resuming redemptions appears in the available reporting.
Other assets issued on Liquid escaped the damage. USDT and tokenized real-world assets on the network were not disrupted and have returned to normal operations.
Background: what a federated sidechain actually is Liquid is a Bitcoin sidechain managed by Blockstream. Users lock BTC with a federation, a group of members who jointly control the reserve through multisig. In return, they receive L-BTC, which is meant to be redeemable one-for-one for the Bitcoin held in that reserve.
The arrangement is called a two-way peg. Bitcoin goes in, L-BTC comes out, and the reverse should work just as smoothly.
That design depends on two things holding firm: the integrity of the multisig reserve and the reliability of the software enforcing the peg. In September, the second one failed.
What this means for L-BTC holders and the sidechain model For anyone holding L-BTC, the immediate issue is liquidity. A token that cannot be redeemed for its underlying asset behaves differently from one that can, even if the issuer promises full repayment.
The 86% coverage figure frames the risk. Most of the backing is there, but the gap is real, and closing it depends on the shortfall being filled through means the reporting does not specify.
Liquid’s insistence on full backing before reopening redemptions is the cautious path. Restarting peg-outs at 86% coverage could invite a rush for the exits, leaving the last redeemers with nothing to claim.
The planned move toward cold storage also signals a shift in operational priorities.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
BTC traded close to $83,000 on October 11, experiencing significant swings during the previous week after falling back from above $87,000. Although Bitcoin has rebounded from lows near $80,000, analysts continue to highlight considerable resistance ahead.
Sell Walls Emerge, Restraining Price GrowthCrypto trader BATMAN stated on October 10 that Bitcoin is facing over $35 million in sell orders situated between $85,000 and $89,000. He marked $85,000 as the first major barrier for the cryptocurrency, noting that buyers would need to absorb this volume for any sustained move higher.
BATMAN pointed to $85,000 as the primary obstacle, citing the large cluster of sell orders above current levels and warning that these needed to be broken down before further gains.
A sell wall forms when several large limit sell orders accumulate above the current price, presenting pronounced resistance in the market. However, such orders may be canceled or shifted, so the presence of $35 million in sell orders does not guarantee that the entire amount will come to market.
Bitcoin has repeatedly struggled to build momentum above $85,000. Research firm QCP Capital, known for its institutional market analysis, earlier identified $87,400 as a key breakout level, suggesting that a decisive move above it could set the stage for an advance toward $90,000.
Mini dictionary: QCP Capital, a Singapore-based digital asset trading and research firm that provides market analysis and manages institutional flows in cryptocurrencies.
Price LevelSell Orders/ResistanceBreakout Target$85,000First major sell wallNone$87,000-$89,000$35 million in clustered orders$90,000 if brokenGlassnode Flags Weak Trading ActivityGlassnode, a leading blockchain analytics provider, issued a report on October 7 underlining concerns with Bitcoin’s current price structure. The firm observed that trading volumes have been notably low despite the latest price rebound, indicating insufficient new capital entering the market.
The analysis also detected renewed selling activity just above $85,000, along with substantial buying near $81,000. Together, these levels suggest Bitcoin is caught within a defined trading range, with sellers at the top and buyers stepping in at the lower end.
Glassnode noted unusually weak spot volumes during the rally, as well as heavy selling on moves above $85,000, signaling limited conviction among buyers.
Institutional flows have also displayed inconsistency. On October 8, U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds saw outflows totaling about $244 million, reflecting heightened caution or profit-taking by fund investors.
Given the current resistance and subdued demand, breaking through the upper range may remain challenging until institutional buying or spot demand increases meaningfully.
XRP Ledger může 23. října 2026 aktivovat balíček oprav fixCleanup3_4_0, pokud podpora ze strany validátorů zůstane nad 80 %. V současnosti jej podporuje 26 z 32 validátorů.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
The XRP Ledger eyes crucial fixes and improvements over the next few days. According to XRPScan data, fixCleanup3_4_0 began its two-week activation window on October 5, 2026, with the earliest activation date being 9:34 AM UTC on October 23, 2026.
Validator support for the fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment must stay above 80% for it to launch. If it slips to 80% or lower even once, the amendment is rejected and the 14-day timer starts over.
This fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment is a collection of fixes for Single Asset Vaults, the Lending Protocol, Automated Market Makers, the permissioned DEX, trust lines, NFTs, MPTs, Escrow, Sponsorship, transaction signing, and permission delegation.
HOT Stories
You Might Also Like
FixCleanup3_4_0, which bundles amendment-gated fixes, was shipped in Version 3.4.0 of xrpld, the reference server implementation of the XRP Ledger protocol, and entered voting on September 17, 2026. The amendment has 81.25% consensus, with 26 out of 32 validators having voted for it.
The Permission Delegation and Batch amendments went live as a key milestone in the past week. The fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment is essential for Permission Delegation, as until it is enabled, users would not be able to delegate the PaymentBurn granular permission. Before the fix, a delegate with the PaymentBurn granular permission could also mint new fungible tokens (trust line tokens or MPTs) in certain circumstances. Other granular permissions are unaffected.
Wide-ranging protocol fixes anticipatedThis fixCleanup3_4_0 amendment is a collection of fixes: it excludes deleted domain offers from the Permissioned DEX invariant, so replacing an offer in one domain with an offer in another no longer triggers a violation.
You Might Also Like
The fix prevents 'AMMClawback' from silently recovering zero when integer MPT rounding floors the amount, instead of burning the holder's LP tokens for nothing, and allows AMMClawback to bypass the owner-reserve check when it must auto-create the paired asset holding, so a compliance clawback is not blocked or vetoed by reserve requirements.
The fix rejects fake-XRP NFT offer amounts, exempts an IOU issuer from their own global freeze when creating an NFToken offer denominated in their own currency, and tightens permissioned DEX domain checks. It also recycles the escrow owner reserve in EscrowCancel and EscrowFinish, so returning IOUs to an owner at the reserve boundary no longer fails. It adds precision and rounding fixes across VaultDeposit, VaultWithdraw, and VaultClawback, so a vault's tracked total assets, available assets, and share supply stay consistent.
The fix refines freeze, authorization, credential, and destination handling for Single Asset Vaults and the Lending Protocol; for example, exempting loan defaults from asset freeze, refusing pseudo-accounts where they cannot participate, and validating permissioned-domain withdrawal destinations and rejecting 'PaymentBurn' payments that cross a zero balance.
Michael Moritz backed Google, PayPal, and Stripe, and Charlie Munger credited one specific trait for his success over smarter rivals. His single question about Amazon stops experienced investors cold and exposes the habit that quietly destroys most portfolios.
Sir Michael Moritz spent about 38 years at Sequoia Capital, where he backed companies like Google, YouTube, PayPal and Stripe. He has a simple explanation for why most investors fall short. On a new episode of Richer, Wiser, Happier from The Investor’s Podcast Network, Michael Moritz said: “Most investors are congenitally incapable of doing nothing. They just have to do something.”
In his view, the urge to act is the problem. Investors trim or sell for reasons that have little to do with a company’s future prospects, such as a scary headline, a round-number price or a gain that feels too big to leave on the table. Each trade feels productive in the moment. Over decades, all that activity cuts short the compounding that actually builds wealth.
Why Charlie Munger Singled Out Moritz’s Temperament The host said that when he asked Charlie Munger which investors were worth interviewing, Munger named one person: Moritz. Munger gave the credit to temperament over intellect. In the host’s account, Munger said Moritz “was not the leading intellectual, but temperamentally he was able to hang on to everything he did better than all his brighter partners.” Moritz said he was “incredibly flattered” that Munger would remember him that way.
Amazon Question That Stops Investors Cold The core of Moritz’s argument is Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN | AMZN Price Prediction). Michael Moritz asked: “In the 30 years or so that Amazon has traded as a public company, how many days has that stock traded at an all-time high? That question always stops people in their tracks.”
The question lands because an all-time high feels like a ceiling. When a stock has never been higher, it looks extended, and selling feels wise. For a business that keeps compounding, though, new highs are routine. Each record gets exceeded as the business grows. Every one of those highs was a moment when selling felt reasonable and later proved costly.
The last decade shows how this plays out. Amazon closed at $262.43 on October 9, up 531.6% from an adjusted $41.55 ten years earlier. The five-year return is much smaller, a gain of 59.6% since October 2021, and that stretch tested anyone holding through the declines. This is the kind of stretch where Michael Moritz says most people lose their nerve: “There is nothing that beats the compounding power of a well-positioned company. But most people are unable to recognize that and capitulate, give up, are frightened.” Those investors, he added, look back years later full of regret.
What Amazon Owners Are Being Asked to Hold Through Now Amazon is testing that discipline again. Management committed to about $200 billion in 2026 capital spending on AI infrastructure, custom chips, robotics and Amazon Leo satellites, and trailing free cash flow has turned negative at -$7.6 billion. To an impatient shareholder, that alone looks like a reason to sell.
The operating results tell a different story. In its second-quarter release filed with the SEC, Amazon reported revenue of $200.61 billion, up 19.6%, and operating income of $27.46 billion, up 43%. AWS revenue rose 37% to $42.23 billion, and the AWS backlog reached $496 billion. CEO Andy Jassy said AWS could “very possibly be a trillion dollar annual revenue business for us in time.” Management also said data centers keep earning for “30-plus years” once they are running. That long return rewards patient owners and punishes those who sell during the build-out.
How Long-Term Owners Can Apply Moritz’s Discipline Moritz’s framework acts as a filter. Before selling, ask whether the reason has to do with the company’s future or only with its price chart. For Amazon, the business questions are whether results match third-quarter guidance of $197.0 billion to $202.0 billion in net sales and $22.5 billion to $26.5 billion in operating income, and whether the capex cycle turns into the free cash flow management has promised. By Moritz’s logic, a new all-time high tells you nothing about either one.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Starknet's native token $STRK surged over 100% on the week after the Ethereum Layer 2 announced it is actively considering a move to become an independent Layer 1 blockchain, with a 2027 quantum-resistance target.
@Starknet's native token $STRK has surged more than 107% over the past week, making it one of the standout performers in the crypto market. The catalyst: a statement from the @Starknet team saying it is actively weighing a transition from an Ethereum Layer 2 network into a fully independent Layer 1 blockchain.
The Announcement That Moved Markets The announcement came on October 8, 2026, when Starknet said on its official account: The statement was enough to send $STRK to its highest level in nine months.
It is worth noting that no final decision has been made.
What It Could Mean for the Broader L2 Ecosystem The market reaction has been striking enough to raise a broader question: could other @Ethereum L2 projects follow suit? The momentum around $STRK suggests investor appetite for L2 networks that signal a path toward greater protocol independence.
Traders should also keep an eye on near-term supply dynamics. Whether strong trading volumes can absorb that additional supply will be a key test of whether the rally has real staying power.
Sources:
STRK Token Outperforms Bitcoin to Hit 9-Month High, Yahoo Finance
STRK rallies as Starknet weighs a move from Ethereum layer 2 to its own layer 1, Crypto Briefing
STRK Price Rises as Starknet Targets Quantum-Resistant L1 by 2027, Crypto Times
Evernorth očekává zahájení obchodování na burze Nasdaq pod tickerem XRPN; drží přibližně 473 milionů XRP a před náklady získala zhruba 300 milionů USD v hotovosti.
XRP price hovered near $1.40 on Sunday, with a potential bullish move in focus before Evernorth’s expected Nasdaq debut.
Bitcoin traded above $83,000, while Ethereum price held near $2,500 and cryptocurrency market capitalization totaled $2.81 trillion. Evernorth expects its shares to start trading Monday under XRPN, following an earlier administrative delay.
XRPN Set to Bring Evernorth’s XRP Treasury to Public Markets The XRP treasury company Evernorth expects to begin Nasdaq trading Monday, October 12, under the ticker XRPN. The company confirmed its merger with Armada Acquisition Corp. II closed on October 9.
Evernorth reported holdings of approximately 473 million XRP and roughly $300 million in gross cash proceeds before transaction expenses. The listing offers investors exposure to XRP through company shares available in brokerage accounts.
🚨 TOMORROW IS A HUGE DAY FOR AS $XRP HITS THE NASDAQ!
Evernorth will officially begin trading on the Nasdaq under $XRPN, bringing a massive treasury of 473 MILLION $XRP and $300 MILLION in cash to public markets!
The largest publicly traded XRP treasury is arriving on Wall Street. Institutional adoption is accelerating! 🔥
— ALLINCRYPTO (@RealAllinCrypto) October 11, 2026
Chief executive Asheesh Birla said Evernorth plans to fund infrastructure and applications supporting wider XRP use. The company also aims to increase XRP holdings per share through its treasury strategies.
Its investors include Ripple, SBI Group, Pantera Capital, Kraken and GSR, which participated in the financing. Evernorth expects to ring Nasdaq’s closing bell on October 14.
XRP Price Eyes $1.50 as MACD Signals Early Momentum Recovery The XRP price traded at $1.4160 on October 11, with its latest four-hour candle down 0.66%. The XRP price remained above the $1.40 support after recovering from the sharp decline recorded earlier this week.
The price of XRP faced initial resistance at $1.45, where a sustained four-hour close above that level could support further gains. A successful breakout would bring $1.50 into focus, matching another resistance level marked in the source
If XRP price reclaimed $1.50 and maintained momentum, the next potential target would be the previous trading region near $1.60.
Source: XRP/USDT 4-hour chart: TradingView The MACD line stood at -0.0089, above its -0.0146 signal line, while the histogram remained positive at 0.0057. The Chaikin Money Flow measured 0.03, slightly above zero, suggesting modest accumulation during the indicator’s 20-period window.
On the downside, a sustained move below $1.40 would weaken the recovery and expose the recent lows.
XRP ETFs See No Net Inflows as Trading Hits $26.33 Million The five XRP spot ETFs reported zero net flows on October 9, according to SoSoValue data. Total net assets stood at $1.57 billion, equivalent to 1.80% of XRP’s market capitalization.
Source: Sosovalue data Trading volume totaled $26.33 million, while net inflows since launch stood at $1.80 billion. Bitwise led with $581.33 million in assets, followed by Franklin’s $413.96 million and Canary’s $339.78 million.
XRP Options Volume Surges as Derivatives Activity Picks Up The XRP derivatives market experienced more trading, with a volume of 3.71% to $1.51 billion. There was a 0.37% decline in open interest to $3.08 billion with only a little less exposure in open positions of the derivatives.
Source: Coinglass data There was a significant rise in options trading, with options volume up 302.85% to $6.90 million. The available interest increased 2.35%. to 66.04 million, and this is on top of the substantial growth in volume of options.
Studie AFFIRM fáze 3 ukázala, že podkožně podávaný přípravek SKYRIZI dosáhl po 12 týdnech významně vyšší míry klinické remise a endoskopické odpovědi u pacientů s Crohnovou nemocí než placebo.
New Phase 3 AFFIRM data show higher rates of clinical and endoscopic response in Crohn's disease patients treated with subcutaneous SKYRIZI versus placebo across all efficacy endpoints and observed subgroups New open-label extension analyses demonstrate sustained endoscopic outcomes over time with SKYRIZI, even in patients with complex disease characteristics and prior treatment exposure In real-world studies, patients with advanced Crohn's disease achieved disease control with RINVOQ, highlighting its potential benefit for difficult-to-treat patients The breadth of scientific abstracts and oral presentations at the American College of Gastroenterology 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting demonstrates AbbVie's pursuit to address the complexities of inflammatory bowel disease care , /PRNewswire/ -- AbbVie today announced the presentation of 22 scientific abstracts from its market-leading inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) portfolio at the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 2026 Annual Scientific Meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, Oct. 9-14. Data presented will include newly unveiled AFFIRM results showing efficacy for SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa) in advanced therapy-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) patients, open-label extension analyses demonstrating long-term outcomes with SKYRIZI in difficult-to-treat IBD and growing real-world evidence supporting RINVOQ® (upadacitinib) in advanced CD.
"People living with IBD want treatments that meaningfully reduce the burden of their disease," said Ryan DeMasi, M.D., vice president, global medical affairs, immunology, AbbVie. "Our presence at ACG reflects AbbVie's drive, as a leader in IBD, to provide what matters most to patients — therapies that perform over time and against the most complicated drivers of disease."
The ACG conference agenda is available here. Select AbbVie oral and poster presentations are highlighted below:
Clinical Remission and Endoscopic Outcomes With Subcutaneous SKYRIZI
Title
Description
Session Details
Efficacy and Safety of
Risankizumab
Subcutaneous Induction and
Maintenance in Patients
With Moderately to Severely
Active Crohn's Disease:
Results From the Phase 3
AFFIRM Study
Results from the Phase 3 AFFIRM trial
showed subcutaneous risankizumab
achieved significantly higher rates of clinical
remission and endoscopic response versus
placebo at Week 12, with rates of all
endpoints remaining numerically higher
through Week 24 among clinical
responders.
Tuesday,
October 13
2:15 PM – 2:25 PM CDT
Oral Presentation 37
Comparative Efficacy of
Subcutaneous
Risankizumab Versus
Guselkumab as Induction
Therapy in Patients With
Moderately to Severely
Active Crohn's Disease: An
Anchored Matching-Adjusted
Indirect Comparison
New indirect comparative analyses showed
subcutaneous risankizumab achieved
significantly higher rates of endoscopic
response versus guselkumab during
induction in patients with moderately to
severely active Crohn's disease.
Tuesday,
October 13
10:30 AM – 4:00 PM CDT
Poster P5748
Multiyear Endoscopic Healing With SKYRIZI in Patients With Complex Disease Characteristics and Prior Treatment Exposure
Title
Description
Session Details
Efficacy of Risankizumab by
Crohn's Disease Location:
Results From 144 Weeks of
the FORTIFY Open-Label
Extension Study
New analyses from the Phase 3 FORTIFY
open-label extension study demonstrated
sustained clinical and endoscopic outcomes
with risankizumab through 144 weeks of
treatment across ileal, colonic and
ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Clinical and
endoscopic remission rates were generally
maintained or improved over time across
disease locations.
Sunday,
October 11
3:30 PM – 7:00 PM CDT
Poster P1061
Risankizumab for Fistulizing
Crohn's Disease: Post Hoc
Analysis of Up to 5 Years of
Treatment From the
FORTIFY Open-Label
Extension
Data from the Phase 3 FORTIFY open-
label extension study showed that 74.5% of
patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease
achieved no draining fistulas after five years
of treatment with risankizumab.
Sunday,
October 11
3:30 PM – 7:00 PM CDT
Poster P1058
Efficacy of Risankizumab by
Crohn's Disease Location
Through 148 Weeks of
Treatment: Results from the
SEQUENCE Open-Label
Extension Study
New analyses from the ongoing
SEQUENCE study demonstrated durable
clinical and endoscopic efficacy with
risankizumab through nearly three years of
treatment in patients with moderately to
severely active Crohn's disease following
anti-TNF failure. Endoscopic outcomes
among patients with ileal disease continued
to improve over time and became
comparable to outcomes observed across
other disease locations by Week 148.
Sunday,
October 11
3:30 PM – 7:00 PM CDT
Poster P1060
Sustained Clinical and
Endoscopic Improvements
With up to 3 Years of
Risankizumab Maintenance
Treatment in Patients With
Moderate to Severe
Ulcerative Colitis Regardless
of the Number of Prior
Advanced Therapy
Exposures
New analyses from the ongoing
COMMAND open-label extension study
demonstrated sustained clinical and
endoscopic improvements with
risankizumab through three years of
treatment in patients with moderately to
severely active ulcerative colitis. Benefits
were observed regardless of prior
advanced therapy exposure, including
among patients with experience across
multiple advanced therapies.
Tuesday,
October 13
10:30 AM – 4:00 PM CDT
Poster P5727
Remission and Endoscopic Response with RINVOQ for Advanced and Difficult-to-Treat Crohn's Disease
Title
Description
Session Details
Real-World Outcomes of
Upadacitinib in Fistulizing
and Stricturing Crohn's
Disease Among Patients in
the Veterans Affairs Health
System
Real-world data from the Veterans Affairs
health system showed that 93.3% of
patients with fistulizing disease and 76.9%
of patients with stricturing disease who
remained on treatment achieved clinical
remission and corticosteroid-free remission
with upadacitinib.
Monday, October 12
10:30 AM – 4:15 PM CDT
Poster P3482
Real-World Outcomes of
Upadacitinib in Isolated Ileal
Crohn's Disease Among
Patients in the Department
of Defense Healthcare
System
New real-world data from the Department of
Defense healthcare system demonstrated
clinical and endoscopic outcomes with
upadacitinib in patients with isolated ileal
Crohn's disease. At six months, 57% of
patients achieved clinical remission, 58%
achieved endoscopic response and 53.6%
achieved endoscopic remission.
Tuesday, October 13
2:35 PM – 2:45 PM CDT
Oral Presentation 39
About SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa)
SKYRIZI is an interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor that blocks IL-23 by selectively binding to its p19 subunit. IL-23, a cytokine involved in inflammatory processes, is thought to be linked to a number of chronic immune-mediated diseases.i SKYRIZI is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease.i
On April 27, 2026, AbbVie announced submission of an application to the FDA seeking approval of SKYRIZI® for subcutaneous induction for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active CD.
SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa) U.S. Uses and Important Safety Informationi
SKYRIZI is a prescription medicine used to treat:
moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults and children 6 years of age and older who may benefit from taking injections or pills (systemic therapy) or treatment using ultraviolet or UV light (phototherapy). active psoriatic arthritis in adults and children 6 years of age and older. moderate to severe Crohn's disease in adults. moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in adults. IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
What is the most important information I should know about SKYRIZI® (risankizumab-rzaa)?
SKYRIZI is a prescription medicine that may cause serious side effects, including:
Serious allergic reactions:
Stop using SKYRIZI and get emergency medical help right away if you get any of the following symptoms of a serious allergic reaction: fainting, dizziness, feeling lightheaded
(low blood pressure) swelling of your face, eyelids, lips,
mouth, tongue, or throat trouble breathing or throat tightness chest tightness skin rash, hives itching Infections:
SKYRIZI may lower the ability of your immune system to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections. Your healthcare provider should check you for infections and tuberculosis (TB) before starting treatment with SKYRIZI and may treat you for TB before you begin treatment with SKYRIZI if you have a history of TB or have active TB. Your healthcare provider should watch you closely for signs and symptoms of TB during and after treatment with SKYRIZI.
Tell your healthcare provider right away if you have an infection or have symptoms of an infection, including: fever, sweats, or chills cough shortness of breath blood in your mucus
(phlegm) muscle aches warm, red, or painful
skin or sores on your
body different from
your psoriasis weight loss diarrhea or stomach
pain burning when you
urinate or urinating
more often than normal Do not use SKYRIZI if you are allergic to risankizumab-rzaa or any of the ingredients in SKYRIZI. See the Medication Guide or Consumer Brief Summary for a complete list of ingredients.
Before using SKYRIZI, tell your healthcare provider about all of your medical conditions,
including if you:
have any of the conditions or symptoms listed in the section "What is the most important information I should know about SKYRIZI?" have an infection that does not go away or that keeps coming back. have TB or have been in close contact with someone with TB. have recently received or are scheduled to receive an immunization (vaccine). Medications that interact with the immune system may increase your risk of getting an infection after receiving live vaccines. You should avoid receiving live vaccines right before, during, or right after treatment with SKYRIZI. Tell your healthcare provider that you are taking SKYRIZI before receiving a vaccine. are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. It is not known if SKYRIZI can harm your unborn baby. are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. It is not known if SKYRIZI passes into your breast milk. become pregnant while taking SKYRIZI. You are encouraged to enroll in the Pregnancy Registry, which is used to collect information about the health of you and your baby. Talk to your healthcare provider or call 1-877-302-2161 to enroll in this registry. Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements.
What are the possible side effects of SKYRIZI?
SKYRIZI may cause serious side effects. See "What is the most important information I should know about SKYRIZI?"
Liver problems may happen while being treated for Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis: A person with Crohn's disease who received SKYRIZI through a vein in the arm developed changes in liver blood tests with a rash that led to hospitalization. Your healthcare provider will do blood tests to check your liver before, during, and at least up to 12 weeks of treatment, and may stop treatment with SKYRIZI if you develop liver problems. Tell your healthcare provider right away if you notice any of the following symptoms: unexplained rash, nausea, vomiting, stomach (abdominal) pain, tiredness (fatigue), loss of appetite, yellowing of the skin and eyes (jaundice), and dark urine.
The most common side effects of SKYRIZI in people treated for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis include: upper respiratory infections, headache, joint pain, stomach (abdominal) pain, injection site reactions, low red blood cells (anemia), fever, back pain, urinary tract infection, and rash.
The most common side effects of SKYRIZI in people treated for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis include: upper respiratory infections, headache, feeling tired, injection site reactions, and fungal skin infections.
These are not all the possible side effects of SKYRIZI. Call your doctor for medical advice about side effects.
Use SKYRIZI exactly as your healthcare provider tells you to use it.
SKYRIZI (risankizumab-rzaa) is available in a 150 mg/mL prefilled syringe and pen, a 55 mg/0.37 mL prefilled syringe, a 600 mg/10 mL vial for intravenous infusion, and a 180 mg/1.2 mL or 360 mg/2.4 mL single-dose prefilled cartridge with on-body injector.
Please click here for the Full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide.
About RINVOQ® (upadacitinib)
Discovered and developed by AbbVie scientists, RINVOQ is a JAK inhibitor that is being studied in several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Based on enzymatic and cellular assays, RINVOQ demonstrated greater inhibitory potency for JAK-1 vs JAK-2, JAK-3 and TYK-2. The relevance of inhibition of specific JAK enzymes to therapeutic effectiveness and safety is not currently known.
Upadacitinib is being studied in Phase 3 clinical trials for alopecia areata, hidradenitis suppurativa, Takayasu arteritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and vitiligo. The use of upadacitinib for these diseases is not FDA approved, and its safety and efficacy have not been established for these diseases.
RINVOQ® (upadacitinib) U.S. Uses and Important Safety Informationii
RINVOQ is a prescription medicine used to treat:
Adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when 1 or more medicines called tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers have been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. Adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. Adults with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. Adults with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) with objective signs of inflammation when a TNF blocker medicine has been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. Adults with giant cell arteritis (GCA). Adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used and did not work well or could not be tolerated, or after taking a different injection or pill (systemic therapy) when your healthcare provider does not recommend TNF blockers. Adults with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used and did not work well or could not be tolerated, or after taking a different injection or pill (systemic therapy) when your healthcare provider does not recommend TNF blockers. It is not known if RINVOQ is safe and effective in children with ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn's disease.
Adults and children 12 years of age and older with moderate to severe eczema (atopic dermatitis [AD]) that did not respond to previous treatment and their eczema is not well controlled with other pills or injections, including biologic medicines, or the use of other pills or injections is not recommended. It is not known if RINVOQ is safe and effective in children under 12 years of age with atopic dermatitis.
It is not known if RINVOQ LQ is safe and effective in children with atopic dermatitis.
RINVOQ/RINVOQ LQ is a prescription medicine used to treat:
Children 2 years of age and older with active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. Children 2 to less than 18 years of age with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when 1 or more medicines called TNF blockers have been used, and did not work well or could not be tolerated. It is not known if RINVOQ/RINVOQ LQ is safe and effective in children under 2 years of age with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis or psoriatic arthritis.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR RINVOQ/RINVOQ LQ (upadacitinib)
What is the most important information I should know about RINVOQ<*>?
RINVOQ may cause serious side effects, including:
Serious infections. RINVOQ can lower your ability to fight infections. Serious infections have happened while taking RINVOQ, including tuberculosis (TB) and infections caused by bacteria, fungi, or viruses that can spread throughout the body. Some people have died from these infections. Your healthcare provider (HCP) should test you for TB before starting RINVOQ and check you closely for signs and symptoms of TB during treatment with RINVOQ. You should not start taking RINVOQ if you have any kind of infection unless your HCP tells you it is okay. If you get a serious infection, your HCP may stop your treatment until your infection is controlled. You may be at higher risk of developing shingles (herpes zoster). Increased risk of death in people 50 years and older who have at least 1 heart disease (cardiovascular) risk factor. Cancer and immune system problems. RINVOQ may increase your risk of certain cancers. Lymphoma and other cancers, including skin cancers, can happen. Current or past smokers are at higher risk of certain cancers, including lymphoma and lung cancer. Follow your HCP's advice about having your skin checked for skin cancer during treatment with RINVOQ. Limit the amount of time you spend in sunlight. Wear protective clothing when you are in the sun and use sunscreen. Increased risk of major cardiovascular (CV) events, such as heart attack, stroke, or death, in people 50 years and older who have at least 1 heart disease (CV) risk factor, especially if you are a current or past smoker. Blood clots. Blood clots in the veins of the legs or lungs and arteries can happen with RINVOQ. This may be life-threatening and cause death. Blood clots in the veins of the legs and lungs have happened more often in people who are 50 years and older and with at least 1 heart disease (CV) risk factor. Allergic reactions. Symptoms such as rash (hives), trouble breathing, feeling faint or dizzy, or swelling of your lips, tongue, or throat, that may mean you are having an allergic reaction have been seen in people taking RINVOQ. Some of these reactions were serious. If any of these symptoms occur during treatment with RINVOQ, stop taking RINVOQ and get emergency medical help right away. Tears in the stomach or intestines. This happens most often in people who take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or corticosteroids. Get medical help right away if you get stomach-area pain, fever, chills, nausea, or vomiting. Low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) in people with diabetes. If you have diabetes, your HCP may tell you to check your blood sugar (glucose) more often during treatment with RINVOQ. Call your HCP if you have any problems with low blood sugar. Changes in certain laboratory tests. Your HCP should do blood tests before you start taking RINVOQ and while you take it. Your HCP may stop your RINVOQ treatment for a period of time if needed because of changes in these blood test results. Do not take RINVOQ if you are allergic to upadacitinib or any of the ingredients in RINVOQ. See the Medication Guide or Consumer Brief Summary for a complete list of ingredients.
What should I tell my HCP BEFORE starting RINVOQ?
Tell your HCP if you:
Are being treated for an infection, have an infection that won't go away or keeps coming back, or have symptoms of an infection, such as: Fever, sweating, or
chills
Shortness of breath
Warm, red, or
painful skin or
sores on your body Muscle aches
Feeling tired
Blood in phlegm
Diarrhea or
stomach pain Cough
Weight loss
Burning when
urinating or
urinating more
often than normal Have TB or have been in close contact with someone with TB. Are a current or past smoker. Have had a heart attack, other heart problems, or stroke. Have or have had any type of cancer, hepatitis B or C, shingles (herpes zoster), blood clots in the veins of your legs or lungs, diverticulitis (inflammation in parts of the large intestine), or ulcers in your stomach or intestines. Have other medical conditions, including liver problems, diabetes, low blood cell counts, chronic lung disease, HIV, or a weak immune system. Live, have lived, or have traveled to parts of the country, such as the Ohio and Mississippi River valleys and the Southwest, that increase your risk of getting certain kinds of fungal infections. If you are unsure if you've been to these types of areas, ask your HCP. Have recently received or are scheduled to receive a vaccine. People who take RINVOQ should not receive live vaccines. Are pregnant or plan to become pregnant. Based on animal studies, RINVOQ may harm your unborn baby. Your HCP will check whether or not you are pregnant before you start RINVOQ. You should use effective birth control (contraception) to avoid becoming pregnant during treatment with RINVOQ and for 4 weeks after your last dose. There is a pregnancy surveillance program for RINVOQ. The purpose of the program is to collect information about the health of you and your baby. If you become pregnant while taking RINVOQ, you are encouraged to report the pregnancy by calling 1-800-633-9110. Are breastfeeding or plan to breastfeed. RINVOQ may pass into your breast milk. Do not breastfeed during treatment with RINVOQ and for 6 days after your last dose. Tell your HCP about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements. RINVOQ and other medicines may affect each other, causing side effects.
Especially tell your HCP if you take:
Medicines for fungal or bacterial infections Rifampicin or phenytoin Medicines that affect your immune system If you are not sure if you are taking any of these medicines, ask your HCP or pharmacist.
What should I avoid while taking RINVOQ?
Avoid food or drink containing grapefruit during treatment with RINVOQ as it may increase the risk of side effects.
What should I do or tell my HCP AFTER starting RINVOQ?
Tell your HCP right away if you have any symptoms of an infection. RINVOQ can make you more likely to get infections or make any infections you have worse. Get emergency help right away if you have any symptoms of a heart attack or stroke while taking RINVOQ, including: Discomfort in the center of your chest that lasts for more than a few minutes or that goes away and comes back Severe tightness, pain, pressure, or heaviness in your chest, throat, neck, or jaw Pain or discomfort in your arms, back, neck, jaw, or stomach Shortness of breath with or without chest discomfort Breaking out in a cold sweat Nausea or vomiting Feeling lightheaded Weakness in one part or on one side of your body Slurred speech Tell your HCP right away if you have any signs or symptoms of blood clots during treatment with RINVOQ, including: Swelling Pain or tenderness in one or
both legs Sudden unexplained chest or
upper back pain Shortness of breath or difficulty
breathing Tell your HCP right away if you have a fever or stomach-area pain that does not go away, and a change in your bowel habits. What are other possible side effects of RINVOQ?
Common side effects include upper respiratory tract infections (common cold, sinus infections), shingles (herpes zoster), herpes simplex virus infections (including cold sores), bronchitis, nausea, cough, fever, acne, headache, swelling of the feet and hands (peripheral edema), increased blood levels of creatine phosphokinase, allergic reactions, inflammation of hair follicles, stomach-area (abdominal) pain, increased weight, flu, tiredness, lower number of certain types of white blood cells (neutropenia, lymphopenia, leukopenia), muscle pain, flu-like illness, rash, increased blood cholesterol levels, increased liver enzyme levels, pneumonia, low number of red blood cells (anemia), and infection of the stomach and intestine (gastroenteritis).
A separation or tear to the lining of the back part of the eye (retinal detachment) has happened in people with atopic dermatitis treated with RINVOQ. Call your HCP right away if you have any sudden changes in your vision during treatment with RINVOQ.
Some people taking RINVOQ may see medicine residue (a whole tablet or tablet pieces) in their stool. If this happens, call your HCP.
These are not all the possible side effects of RINVOQ.
How should I take RINVOQ/RINVOQ LQ?
RINVOQ is taken once a day with or without food. Do not split, crush, or chew the tablet. Take RINVOQ exactly as your HCP tells you to use it. RINVOQ is available in 15 mg, 30 mg, and 45 mg extended-release tablets. RINVOQ LQ is taken twice a day with or without food. RINVOQ LQ is available in a 1 mg/mL oral solution. RINVOQ LQ is not the same as RINVOQ tablets. Do not switch between RINVOQ LQ and RINVOQ tablets unless the change has been made by your HCP.
<*>Unless otherwise stated, "RINVOQ" in the IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION refers to RINVOQ and RINVOQ LQ.
This is the most important information to know about RINVOQ. For more information, talk to your HCP.
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
If you are having difficulty paying for your medicine, AbbVie may be able to help. Visit AbbVie.com/PatientAccessSupport to learn more.
Please click here for the Full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide.
About AbbVie in Immunology
AbbVie is relentless in our pursuit to redefine the standard of care for patients living with immune-mediated conditions, with the goal of helping them live a life free from the limitations of their disease. For nearly 30 years, AbbVie has led and helped shape the field of immunology through groundbreaking science and trusted medicines. Building on deep expertise across gastroenterology, rheumatology and dermatology, and other areas of high unmet need, we continue to invest in a broad and differentiated pipeline – spanning innovative modalities, novel mechanisms of action and next-generation approaches designed to conquer the complex biology underlying immune-mediated disease.
Today, more than 1 million patients worldwide are treated with AbbVie's immunology medicines, approved in more than 175 countries across 20+ immune-mediated diseases that impact adult and pediatric populations. As we work to strengthen our legacy and drive the next wave of innovation, we remain focused on delivering meaningful progress for patients and expanding access to our medicines. For more information, please visit www.abbvie.com/immunology.
About AbbVie
AbbVie's mission is to discover and deliver innovative medicines and solutions that solve serious health issues today and address the medical challenges of tomorrow. We strive to have a remarkable impact on people's lives across several key therapeutic areas including immunology, neuroscience and oncology – and products and services in our Allergan Aesthetics portfolio. For more information about AbbVie, please visit us at www.abbvie.com. Follow @abbvie on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and YouTube.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some statements in this news release are, or may be considered, forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "project" and similar expressions and uses of future or conditional verbs, generally identify forward-looking statements. AbbVie cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, challenges to intellectual property, competition from other products, difficulties inherent in the research and development process, adverse litigation or government action, changes to laws and regulations applicable to our industry, the impact of global macroeconomic factors, such as economic downturns or uncertainty, international conflict, trade disputes and tariffs, and other uncertainties and risks associated with global business operations. Additional information about the economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors that may affect AbbVie's operations is set forth in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," of AbbVie's 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as updated by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in other documents that AbbVie subsequently files with the Securities and Exchange Commission that update, supplement or supersede such information. AbbVie undertakes no obligation, and specifically declines, to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements as a result of subsequent events or developments, except as required by law.
i SKYRIZI [Package Insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc.
ii RINVOQ [Package Insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie Inc.
Palantir (PLTR +5.17%) has been an incredible stock to own over the past few years. It has become one of the most prominent AI companies in the country, and a host of companies and government agencies make use of its services. It has grown its sales at an incredible pace over the past few years, and its stock has soared as a result.
However, there's one overarching question: Has Palantir's stock gotten ahead of itself? I think history offers a pretty strong indication about the answer, and it's not one that Palantir shareholders will be happy to hear.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Competition is rising Palantir made a name for itself by offering its customers a fairly easy plug-and-play AI software. Essentially, clients can easily deploy Palantir's AI-powered analytics tool to mine their internal data for useful insights. The early iterations of its software were intended for government use, but eventually, the company found its way into the commercial marketplace. The combination of government and commercial AI has been a powerful one for Palantir, but it isn't the only game in town anymore.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
89/100
Today's Change
(
5.17
%) $
10.27
Current Price
$
209.05
Rising stars like Anthropic and OpenAI also have great AI products that companies can use, and these products could become more popular than Palantir's, which could result in its growth slowing.
Wall Street analysts are already projecting just that. The consensus view is that Palantir will report that it grew by 84% in Q3, and that it will further slow to 75% in Q4, compared to 93% in Q2. Next year, the projected growth rate declines to 50%.
If that happens, the stock could be in trouble, as there is a ton of hoped-for growth already baked into the stock. However, Wall Street has been consistently wrong on its Palantir projections, as its growth rate has continued to accelerate quarter after quarter, even though the company's own projections also indicated it would slow.
PLTR Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts.
Yet as more companies become comfortable deploying AI tools from giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, this may pose a sizable headwind for Palantir, since most of its platforms' capabilities can be recreated for far less than it charges for a subscription.
That wouldn't be great for the stock, and history has nearly countless examples of innovators that started as disruptors before being disrupted themselves. The main problem for Palantir's stock is that it's priced like the company has no competition.
Palantir's stock is pricey From a price-to-sales ratio standpoint, Palantir is very expensive at 81.
PLTR PS Ratio data by YCharts
Generally speaking, software stocks are considered expensive when they trade above 20 or 30 times sales, let alone triple or quadruple that level. For comparison, AI lab Anthropic is expected to go public with a market cap of about $2 trillion sometime in November. Back in July, Anthropic told investors that its annual run rate would be about $65 billion. If the market were willing to put a P/S valuation of 81 on Anthropic, that would give it an IPO market cap of $5.3 trillion.
As a group, companies that reach such high price-to-sales multiples have a terrible track record of long-term share price performance in the years that follow, as there is a lot of anticipated growth already priced into the stock. Even if Palantir can continue growing rapidly, its stock will spend a lot of time absorbing that growth while trading sideways to bring its valuation down to a more reasonable level. Or, it could be disrupted by one of the growing AI labs such as Anthropic or OpenAI, in which case the market could respond by selling it off. As a result, I think investors can expect lackluster returns from Palantir through 2028.
Na ověřeném účtu Coldcard na síti X se objevil phishingový odkaz; firma vyšetřuje prolomení účtu. S útokem na uživatele Coldcard souvisí krádež bitcoinů v hodnotě nejméně 100 milionů USD ze 7 300 peněženek.
Coldcard, a company specializing in Bitcoin-only hardware wallets, reported that a phishing link appeared on its official X account on Sunday. The incident raised concerns given Coldcard’s longtime emphasis on security, including its use of offline two-factor authentication and tightly controlled account access procedures since 2017.
Account breach under investigationColdcard stated that it is currently investigating how the phishing link was posted from its verified X account. The post has now been removed. While the investigation is ongoing, the company emphasized that its only official website remains coldcard.com and warned users not to visit or engage with any other links that may appear to be from the company.
In response to the breach, Coldcard has reached out to X support and is conducting a comprehensive review of all account access records. The company has committed to sharing any further verified updates as they become available.
Users should avoid interacting with unauthorized links, and Coldcard’s only official online presence is at their website. The company is in contact with X and is auditing account access to ensure enhanced security.
The apparent compromise of a high-profile account with advanced authentication measures highlighted the ongoing vulnerability even among security-focused entities within the cryptocurrency sector. Coldcard reiterated that user vigilance is essential, particularly as cyber threats become increasingly sophisticated.
Impact of July exploits and market responseJuly 2026 became the second-worst month for cryptocurrency thefts this year, primarily due to a significant exploit targeting Coldcard users. According to data from DefiLlama, hackers made off with $247.4 million in digital assets during the month, behind only the $644 million stolen in April.
Galaxy Digital reported that the Coldcard-related attack accounted for the largest share, with at least $100 million in Bitcoin stolen from 7,300 wallets across three confirmed waves of attack. The company has also pointed to a suspected fourth wave of activity that could increase total losses to approximately $130 million.
DefiLlama’s hack tracker estimated the amount tied specifically to the Coldcard exploit at $115 million. The discrepancy in reported totals reflects ongoing efforts by security firms and blockchain analytics groups to precisely determine the scope of the theft.
The recurring losses underscore the persistent risk of phishing and account breaches, even for companies prioritizing robust security measures. As investigations continue, Coldcard pledged transparency with its community and ongoing audits to prevent further incidents.
Meme token market trends and risk monitoringAmid heightened security concerns, experts have noted the importance of carefully monitoring both technical transactions and market trends, especially as meme tokens attract massive attention. In the meme token market, an internet trend can transform into millions of dollars of interest within days. According to data shared by Fomo App, a trade involving “Niu Lai”—which turned an initial $99 investment into approximately $370,000, stands out as a striking example of this activity. In this market, tracking not only prices but also the timing and token choices of investors is crucial. Fomo App brings token discovery and trading together on a single platform, featuring social feeds, investor rankings, and trade notifications. Discover Fomo App to follow the world of meme tokens alongside investor activity.
The ongoing investigation and recent losses have spurred renewed calls for heightened awareness among crypto investors and service providers alike.
Spot Chainlink ETFs pulled in a record $9.48 million on October 9, their single best inflow day ever, pushing collective holdings to 2.35% of the total LINK supply.
Record Single-Day Inflow for Spot LINK ETFsSpot @Chainlink ETFs logged their biggest single day of investor inflows on record on October 9, absorbing $9.48 million in fresh capital.
That rapid jump in a single session underlines the growing appetite among institutional investors for regulated exposure to $LINK.
ETFs Now Hold 2.35% of LINK's Total SupplyThe record inflow adds to a broader trend of steady accumulation by spot ETF products since they launched. Collectively, the funds now hold 2.35% of $LINK's entire circulating supply, according to @BSCNews.
The context matters too.
That fixed cap means continued ETF accumulation steadily tightens the available float, a dynamic that institutional flow watchers have begun to flag.
The October 9 inflow stands as the clearest single-day signal yet that demand for regulated $LINK exposure is picking up pace, even as broader crypto markets remain unsettled.
Sources:
CryptoTicker: Chainlink Fund Inflow Analysis, October 2026
CoinGape: First Chainlink ETF Sees $41M in Inflows on Launch
CoinMarketCap: Chainlink (LINK) Price and Supply Data
Velký investor po 34% poklesu v posledních dnech během dvou dnů nakoupil Zcash za 32 mil. USD a zdvojnásobil svou držbu na 54 400 ZEC v hodnotě 66,75 mil. USD.
A whale investor has doubled Zcash holdings in the past two days to $66.75M. According to Arkham data, the large investor (address t1ZLg) bought $21.8M and $10.2M ZEC across Binance and Kraken, respectively, over the weekend.
This effectively doubled the investor’s ZEC holdings from 24K to 54.4K (worth $66.75M) in two days. On-chain data revealed that the address began aggressive ZEC accumulation in mid-September.
Source: Arkham The whale activity slowed for a while around 22nd-26th September but picked up aggressively at the end of the month. The activity slowdown coincided with the ZEC price peak near $1700.
But the whale’s subsequent steady bids throughout October showed he was grabbing the ZEC’s discounted window as the price dropped by 34% in the past few days. This raises the question: Is there broader whale bidding to trigger ZEC price recovery?
Zcash: Are other whales also buying the ZEC dip? Surprisingly, most whales were not bullish on ZEC, at least as of press time. According to CryptoQuant, the recent pullback was attracting ‘normal’ spot order sizes (grey bubble maps).
Source: CryptoQuant In most cases, big whale orders (denoted by green bubble maps) tend to coincide with easing pullbacks or triggering strong rebounds. This happened in March, August, and September.
However, during the recent pullback, the indicator didn’t flag many big whale orders. As such, this could reduce the chances of a strong rebound or ZEC defending the $1000 support level.
A similar picture was painted across the Futures market. According to Nansen, whale interest dropped by 14% in the past seven days across Hyperliquid’s derivatives market. However, smart money traders were up 134%.
This indicates that some sophisticated players still view the recent discount window as a buying opportunity, like the whale that bought ZEC across Binance and Kraken.
Source: Nansen But the Net Position Change was not green to underscore an overall bullish leaning. In other words, broader whale positioning was still somewhat cautious across the spot and derivatives market.
Spot ZEC ETF extends weekly outflows And this cautious positioning is understandable ahead of this week’s U.S. inflation data (CPI), which could trigger another macro volatility and increase liquidation risks.
In fact, even institutional investors have been in a risk-off mode since late September, as illustrated by two consecutive weeks of outflows from U.S. ZEC ETFs ($124M net outflows).
Source: SoSo Value As such, the $1,100 and $1000 support levels could be retested or cracked if the bearish pressure deepens in the coming days.
Overall, the recent 34% pullback seems like a great buying opportunity. However, the upcoming macro volatility still has whales and institutional investors on edge.
Source: ZEC/USDT, TradingView Final Summary Zcash whale doubled its ZEC holdings to $66.75M after buying the recent dip Broader whale activity was weak, and spot ZEC ETF outflows hit $123M amid macro uncertainty
Proti společnosti The Ensign Group (ENSG) byla podána hromadná žaloba investorů kvůli údajnému porušení federálních zákonů o cenných papírech v období od 10. února 2022 do 18. června 2026.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against The Ensign Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENSG) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Ensign securities between February 10, 2022 and June 18, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/the-ensign-group-inc-ensg-class_action_lawsuit.
Ensign Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
Ensign's business model depends on the systematic and widespread neglect of elderly people who live in its facilities, including those with needs for high levels of care; Ensign's abuse and neglect includes not giving residents enough food, medical attention, or even basic toiletries as well as failing to respond to residents in clear distress, which has resulted in resident deaths; Ensign uses self-reporting measures as a way to cover up that it systematically neglects patients; Ensign defrauds Medicaid and Medicare by taking federal funds to help patients who need high levels of care, and then neglecting those same patients; Ensign falsifies the number of hours that Certified Nursing Assistants spend with residents; Ensign engages in an illegal scheme to rent the licenses of Administrators who are not generally present at, nor actually managing, its facilities; Ensign materially understated the reputational and litigation exposure that comes with a dangerous, abhorrent, and illegal business model; and as a result, defendants' statements about Ensign's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.What's Next for Ensign Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/the-ensign-group-inc-ensg-class_action_lawsuit, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Ensign you have until December 7, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Ensign Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Ensign Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/318431
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
AppLovin čelí hromadné žalobě kvůli údajnému zkreslování informací o vývoji AI; po zveřejnění tržeb ve výši 1,92 mld. USD akcie 6. srpna 2026 klesly o 19,66 %.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In AppLovin To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in AppLovin between February 12, 2026 and August 5, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against AppLovin Corporation ("AppLovin" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: APP) and reminds investors of the November 16, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the generative AI video creative feature for the Company's AppLovin Ads platform was subject to significant development delays, making its release on the Company's timeline unlikely; (2) Defendants overstated the constancy with which AppLovin was improving its AI models; (3) for these reasons, among others, AppLovin had significantly overstated the benefits and reliability of the purportedly "virtuous cycle" and "compounding" value proposition that its AI models provided to customers and to the Company; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The truth began to emerge on July 13, 2026, when a Bank of America Securities analyst published a note reporting softer-than-expected e-commerce ad growth for the month of June, raising concerns over the rollout of AppLovin Ads to all advertisers. Bank of America Securities' review of publicly available e-commerce data showed "AppLovin's eCommerce footprint expanded at a slower pace in June", and the analyst concluded that the AppLovin Ads [general availability ("GA")] rollout enjoyed only a "muted . . . start." Accordingly, based on a "slower initial GA ramp", Bank of America Securities lowered its expectations of AppLovin's annual revenue.
Following publication of the note, AppLovin's stock price fell $64.13 per share, or 12.65%, to close at $442.85 per share on July 13, 2026.
Then, on August 5, 2026, AppLovin issued a press release announcing its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, and held a conference call to discuss the same. Among other items, AppLovin reported revenue of $1.92 billion, below consensus estimates of $1.94 billion. Defendants attributed their quarterly performance to their "pace of meaningful model improvement", which was "lighter than normal during the quarter." Defendants also revealed that their generative AI video tool was "still [a] work in progress."
On this news, AppLovin's stock price fell $82.13 per share, or 19.66%, to close at $335.67 per share on August 6, 2026.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding AppLovin's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the AppLovin class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/APP or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the AppLovin Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the AppLovin securities fraud lawsuit about?
The lawsuit alleges AppLovin misled investors about its AI technology, including development delays, the pace of AI model improvements, and the benefits and reliability of its AI-driven advertising platform.
Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired AppLovin Corporation (NASDAQ: APP) securities between February 12, 2026 and August 5, 2026 may be eligible if they suffered losses.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?
A lead plaintiff represents the proposed class during the litigation. Eligible investors must file a motion with the court by November 16, 2026. Investors may participate without serving as lead plaintiff.
Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased AppLovin securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/318333
Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
SushiSwap nasadil token $HYPE od Hyperliquid na Robinhood Chain prostřednictvím LayerZero. Aktivum je na této síti poprvé dostupné k obchodování a poskytování likvidity.
SushiSwap has deployed Hyperliquid's $HYPE token on Robinhood Chain for the first time, using LayerZero for cross-chain bridging as part of its broader multichain expansion strategy.
SushiSwap Bridges $HYPE to Robinhood Chain via LayerZero@SushiSwap has deployed @HyperliquidX's $HYPE token on @RobinhoodCrypto Chain, marking the first time the asset has been available for trading on the network. The integration was made possible through @LayerZero_Core, which serves as the cross-chain bridging layer connecting $HYPE to the growing Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The partnership with @LayerZero_Core allows users to buy, trade, provide liquidity, and launch tokens using $HYPE directly on the chain. The move adds a notable DeFi-native asset to a network that has quickly become one of the more closely watched Layer 2 launches of 2026.
What Is Robinhood Chain? Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum L2 for tokenized stocks and real-world assets, built on Arbitrum Orbit. It launched a public testnet on February 10, 2026, and went live on mainnet on July 1, 2026. Tokens that track stocks like NVDA and AAPL trade 24/7 on-chain as Stock Tokens, settle in seconds, and plug directly into DeFi.
SushiSwap's presence on the chain is already well established. All new token launches on Robinhood Chain via RevShare now route exclusively to SushiSwap V3. The addition of $HYPE signals that $SUSHI intends to go further, bringing established DeFi-native assets onto the platform rather than limiting its role to new token issuance.
The launch forms part of SushiSwap's broader multichain strategy , and the team is expected to bring additional assets to Robinhood Chain in the coming months. For $HYPE, the listing represents its first footprint on the L2, opening up a new venue for traders and liquidity providers who are active on the network.
The LayerZero ecosystem includes DeFi projects such as SushiSwap, and these projects use LayerZero to overcome multichain challenges such as liquidity fragmentation. That infrastructure is central to this integration, enabling $HYPE to move across chains without requiring a new native deployment from scratch.
Sources:
TokenPost: SushiSwap Launches HYPE Trading and Liquidity on Robinhood Chain
Coinfomania: $HYPE Goes Live on Robinhood Chain
Dwellir: What Is Robinhood Chain?
Uniswap has surpassed $6 billion in cumulative protocol fees, with nearly $147 million generated in the past 30 days alone, underscoring its dominance as the leading decentralized exchange.
@Uniswap has crossed a significant milestone, surpassing $6 billion in cumulative protocol fees. According to on-chain data, the decentralized exchange has now generated $6.07 billion in total fees since its launch, cementing its position as the dominant force in decentralized trading.
Fee Surge Fuelled by Multi-Chain Expansion The milestone has been driven in large part by a sharp rise in recent activity. $UNI generated close to $147 million in fees over the past 30 days alone, reflecting a period of sustained trading momentum across the protocol.
Much of that surge can be tied to Uniswap's expanding multi-chain footprint. More recently, Robinhood Chain has become a notable driver of volume.
Fee Switch Adds a New Economic Layer for $UNI Holders Beyond the raw fee figures, a structural shift is underway in how those fees flow.
For a protocol that has quietly processed trillions of dollars in trading volume, the $6 billion fee milestone is less a finishing line than a marker of how deeply embedded @Uniswap has become in on-chain finance.
Sources:
DefiLlama: Uniswap TVL, Fees, Revenue and Volume
CoinLaw: Uniswap Statistics 2026
Crypto Briefing: Uniswap Generates Nearly $23M in Protocol Revenue After Fee Switch Activation
Securitize spustila na Solaně tokeny navázané na 12 amerických akcií, kryté v poměru 1:1. Držitelé mají nárok na podkladový cenný papír, nikoli automaticky na přímý zápis do seznamu akcionářů.
11 October 2026 | 16:57 A token in a wallet can track Apple or Nvidia one-for-one while the company’s official shareholder register carries a different name. Securitize’s new stock tokens place both parts of that arrangement in view.
Key Takeaways Securitize launched tokenized security entitlements for 12 U.S. stocks on Solana. The company says each token is backed 1:1 by an underlying share. Holders own a security entitlement through Securitize Markets. Dividends and applicable voting rights are designed to pass through that structure. Direct registration depends on a later issuer and transfer-agent process. The words behind Securitize’s new stock tokens On October 8, Securitize launched Securitize Stocks, a Solana-based offering tied to 12 U.S. equities, including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Tesla, Amazon and Netflix. Trading begins through the company’s registered broker-dealer platform for eligible users in permitted jurisdictions, with settlement in USDC.
The significant detail sits in the product’s legal description. Securitize Stocks are security entitlements backed one-for-one by the relevant underlying shares. The company’s disclosure says that holders are not registered shareholders of Apple, Nvidia or the other issuers unless they complete a supported conversion process.
That does not reduce the token to a simple price bet. Securitize says the entitlement is structured to preserve the applicable economic benefits of the underlying security, including dividends and, where the share class carries them, voting rights. It does, however, define the route through which those benefits reach the investor.
Layer one
The token in the wallet
The investor controls a blockchain-issued instrument, subject to the product’s transfer, eligibility and compliance terms.
Layer two
The security entitlement
Securitize Markets maintains the legal claim linking the holder to the underlying stock position and its stated rights.
Layer three
The issuer’s share record
The underlying company’s transfer agent does not automatically record the token holder as a shareholder in the investor’s own name.
The entitlement links the wallet to the share A security entitlement is a familiar part of the U.S. securities system. Many conventional investors also hold shares through a broker or custodian instead of appearing directly on a company’s register. Their economic position depends on a recognised claim maintained through that intermediary.
Securitize applies that model to a blockchain token. The token can move through an onchain environment, while the broker-dealer and related market infrastructure maintain the link to the supporting share. The product therefore combines a wallet-based instrument with the legal framework that normally sits behind a brokerage position.
That arrangement gives the holder more than exposure to a price chart, but it also means the investor should read the entitlement terms as closely as the token’s backing claim. A one-for-one reserve answers one question: whether a corresponding share supports the token. It does not answer every question about corporate actions, transfer restrictions or the investor’s status on the issuer’s books.
Dividends and votes travel through the same structure Securitize says its stock tokens carry applicable economic benefits, including dividends and voting rights where the underlying share class provides them. Those benefits pass through the entitlement structure rather than arising from a wallet address appearing directly on an issuer’s shareholder list.
That becomes relevant whenever the underlying company takes an action beyond ordinary trading. Stock splits, cash or stock dividends, tender offers, mergers, delistings and trading halts all require an operational process. The token holder needs to know who receives the corporate-action notice, how instructions are collected, and how the resulting cash, shares or voting rights are delivered.
These are not unusual concerns created by blockchain. They exist across conventional broker-held securities as well. Tokenization adds another record—the token on the blockchain—which makes it easier for buyers to assume that wallet control alone settles every ownership question.
A wallet key controls the token, not the whole system Private-key control and shareholder registration describe different parts of the same investment. A private key can establish control over a token where the product permits wallet transfers. It cannot, on its own, replace the broker-dealer, custodian, clearing arrangements or transfer agent that support the underlying security.
Securitize’s release places those institutions inside the product’s design. Trading remains subject to onboarding, KYC and AML checks, securities laws and jurisdictional eligibility. The offering is therefore built for regulated securities markets, even though the investor-facing position can sit on Solana.
The company also describes future venues connected to the New York Stock Exchange and OKXICE, where wider trading hours and self-custody are among the intended features. Those venues have not launched, and their operation remains subject to regulatory and operational conditions. They should be treated as part of Securitize’s wider plan rather than as features available to every holder today.
Conversion is possible only under specific conditions Securitize calls its design a convertible entitlement token, or CET. The term matters because it describes a possible route from an intermediary-held entitlement to direct ownership recorded on an issuer’s transfer-agent books.
That route requires the underlying company to adopt issuer-sponsored tokenization and make the relevant transfer-agent process available. Until then, the investor holds the security entitlement described in Securitize’s documentation. Buying a token linked to Apple or Tesla does not create an automatic right to demand direct registration immediately.
Two products carrying the same ticker can therefore give their holders very different rights. A token may track a share price through a derivative, represent a certificate backed by stock, provide a security entitlement, or be issued directly by the company as its own share record. The ticker tells readers which company the token references; the legal terms explain what the investor owns.
That is why disclosure has become central to tokenized securities. The developing U.S. debate is increasingly focused on whether a blockchain balance represents direct ownership, a security entitlement or a separate contractual claim, as seen in the discussion around tokenized-stock investor rights and ownership disclosures.
Before buying a tokenized stock, check this The ticker is only the start of the due diligence.
Read the legal description. Confirm whether the token is a direct share, an entitlement, a certificate or a derivative. Identify the institutions behind it. The broker-dealer, custodian and transfer agent determine how the underlying position is maintained. Check corporate-action procedures. Product terms should explain how dividends, votes, mergers and stock splits reach the holder. Confirm conversion rights today. A future pathway to direct registration differs from a currently available conversion process. Review failure and transfer risks. Read the provisions on custody, insolvency, redemption, smart contracts, liquidity and restricted transfers. The token tells only part of the ownership story Securitize’s launch gives tokenized equities a stronger legal structure than a product designed only to mimic a stock price. One-for-one backing and a defined security entitlement can connect an onchain position to dividends, voting rights and established securities-market infrastructure.
The investor’s wallet still represents only one link in that chain. Before treating a tokenized stock as equivalent to a conventional share, buyers should identify the claim behind it, the institutions responsible for honouring it, and whether direct registration is available under the product’s current terms.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal or tax advice. Tokenized securities may involve market, liquidity, custody, counterparty, smart-contract and regulatory risks. Investors should review the applicable product disclosures before investing.
Author
Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem. To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem. His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded significant outflows this month, marking a notable shift in sentiment among crypto investors. Data from Decrypt’s ETF tracker shows these funds faced back-to-back redemptions, including a $484.9 million exit on Wednesday, their steepest daily withdrawal since June.
Bitcoin ETFs reverse course in OctoberDespite a brief recovery with $21.1 million in inflows on Friday, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs finished the first seven trading days of October with a net outflow of $386.3 million. The modest gain failed to compensate for large withdrawals earlier in the week, particularly following Wednesday’s sizable exit and an additional $244.1 million lost on Thursday.
Bitcoin ETFs provide a way for investors to participate in the digital asset market without directly holding cryptocurrencies or managing private wallets. The products mirror the price of Bitcoin and are traded on regular brokerage platforms, attracting both institutional and retail investors since their debut.
October began on a positive note, as the ETFs attracted a combined $292.6 million on the first two days. Another $118.8 million flowed in on October 6. However, these early inflows were overshadowed by the subsequent downturn, erasing previous gains for the month.
ETFOctober Net FlowsLargest Single-Day OutflowCumulative Net InflowsTotal Net AssetsBitcoin-$386.3 million-$484.9 million (Wed.)$57.6 billion$100.6 billionEthereum-$635 million-$201.9 million (Oct. 6)$13.2 billion$14.5 billionSolana-$24.8 million-$3.8 million (Fri.)$137.9 millionNot disclosedETF flows reflect shifting investor sentimentAfter a strong September, the landscape changed abruptly. In mid-September, following the U.S. Senate’s failed cloture vote on the Clarity Act, Bitcoin ETFs experienced a series of outflows. However, they quickly rebounded with nine straight sessions of inflows totaling roughly $3 billion, which returned year-to-date figures into positive territory for 2026.
Flows in and out of crypto ETFs have become a reliable gauge of market sentiment, as they reflect the willingness of investors to take on or shed digital asset exposure through regulated investment vehicles.
However, the reversal so far in October suggests caution and profit-taking may be returning to the market as uncertainty persists around regulatory and macroeconomic developments.
Ethereum and Solana ETFs deepen lossesEthereum ETFs have recorded a more severe downturn. The funds posted a $56.1 million outflow on Friday, extending their loss streak to nine consecutive trading days in October. During this period, cumulative withdrawals reached nearly $700 million, with the largest single-day loss of $201.9 million taking place on October 6. Despite these losses, Ethereum ETFs still hold $14.5 billion in total net assets and have attracted $13.2 billion in net inflows since their introduction.
Solana ETFs also faced negative flows this month, though on a much smaller scale compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Outflows for Solana ETFs totaled $3.8 million on Friday, the fifth straight day of net redemptions. The funds’ only inflow for October, $1.3 million, occurred on October 2. Overall, Solana ETFs have lost $24.8 million so far this month, while cumulative net inflows since launch stand at $137.9 million.
Solana, a blockchain known for its fast transaction speeds and lower fees compared to some other networks, continues to attract investor attention through ETF products, but recent flow data suggests more caution among holders.
Bitcoin ETFs, despite recent negative momentum, remain the largest by net inflow at $57.6 billion since launch and currently manage $100.6 billion in assets.
Mini dictionary: Cloture vote — A cloture vote is a procedure used in the U.S. Senate to end debate on a legislative issue and bring it to a final vote. Reaching cloture usually requires a supermajority, which can be a significant hurdle for passing contentious bills.
Proti společnosti Chemours (NYSE: CC) byla podána hromadná žaloba akcionářů kvůli údajnému nadhodnocení poptávky po produktech Opteon a nespolehlivému výhledu hospodaření na rok 2026.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Chemours Company (NYSE: CC) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Chemours securities between February 20, 2026 and August 4, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/chemours-company-cc-class_action_lawsuit.
Chemours Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that:
Defendants had materially overstated aftermarket demand for their Opteon products; demand for such products was decreasing as a result of Defendants' overselling Opteon products in the preceding fiscal year; as a result of these undisclosed issues, Defendants' financial guidance for the 2026 fiscal year was unreliable; and as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.What's Next for Chemours Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/chemours-company-cc-class_action_lawsuit, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Chemours you have until December 7, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Chemours Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Chemours Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/318448
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Shiba Inu's $SHIB memecoin is closing in on the 1.7 million Ethereum holder milestone, with its real-world holder base likely far larger once multichain addresses on Solana and Shibarium are included.
@Shibtoken's $SHIB memecoin is on the cusp of a significant community milestone. According to @etherscan, the token currently counts 1,698,001 holder addresses on Ethereum, putting it fewer than 2,000 wallets away from the 1.7 million mark.
Steady Growth Through September and October The climb to this level has been methodical rather than explosive. That pace continued into October, with
The steady accumulation is notable because it has come against a backdrop of subdued price action. For many observers, the persistence of wallet growth during quieter price periods is itself a signal of durable community interest.
It is worth noting a caveat on the numbers.
The Multichain Picture Makes 1.7M Look Conservative The Etherscan figure captures only Ethereum-native holdings. When other networks are factored in, $SHIB's true reach is considerably broader.
The token's footprint expanded further still in early October.
Taken together, the Ethereum count approaching 1.7 million is as much a floor as a ceiling. Once Shibarium and @Solana addresses are included, $SHIB's combined holder base already sits well above that figure, illustrating just how far the memecoin's reach now extends beyond its original chain.
Sources:
U.Today: 1,693,365 SHIB On-Chain Holders Reached
CoinTurk: Shiba Inu Surpasses 1.8 Million Holders Across Ethereum and Shibarium
CryptoNews: Shiba Inu Trading Volume Soars 171% After Launch on Solana
Na společnost Fluence Energy (FLNC) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli tvrzením, že zkreslovala svou schopnost dodat nevyřízené zakázky a vykázat tržby, na nichž byl založen její výhled tržeb pro fiskální rok 2026.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Fluence Energy, Inc (NASDAQ: FLNC) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Fluence Energy securities between November 24, 2025 and September 16, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/fluence-energy-inc-flnc-class_action_lawsuit.
Fluence Energy Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
Fluence Energy's ability to deliver its backlog and recognize the revenue underlying its fiscal 2026 guidance depended on new contract manufacturing facilities, including facilities that were not completed, not operational, and/or not capable of producing at the volumes the guidance assumed; the corrective measures Fluence Energy had implemented to address production problems at its contract manufacturers were not remediating those problems, which persisted and extended to Fluence Energy's new facilities; as a result, a material portion of the backlog that defendants represented as "securing" or "covering" Fluence Energy's fiscal 2026 revenue guidance were likely to be delivered and recognized in fiscal 2026; and as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Fluence Energy's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.What's Next for Fluence Energy Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/cases/fluence-energy-inc-flnc-class_action_lawsuit, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Fluence Energy you have until November 30, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Fluence Energy Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Fluence Energy Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com.
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/316668
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Crédit Agricole očekává další mírné zpřísnění měnové politiky MAS, které podpoří SGD; u páru USD/SGD však považuje úroveň 1,27 za silné krátkodobé dno.
USD/SGD Forecast: Crédit Agricole Expects Further MAS Tightening Singapore Dollar support could strengthen as firm growth and rising inflation prompt another modest MAS policy tightening, says Crédit Agricole. Crédit Agricole expects Singapore to tighten monetary policy again on Wednesday, with technology-led growth and rising inflation supporting the case for a stronger currency despite the US Dollar's recent advance.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore's announcement is scheduled for 14 October.
Crédit Agricole's immediate currency outlook is more restrained, however, with 1.27 described as a strong near-term floor for USD/SGD while US interest-rate expectations continue to support the Dollar.
The latest official inflation release put August core inflation at 2.2%, up from 2% in July, with faster increases in services, retail goods and food prices.
Crédit Agricole strategist Eddie Cheung writes: "Singapore macro fundamentals continue to strengthen amid a global tech upcycle and foreign portfolio inflows, while the negatives from trade tensions have been less than expected."
Demand running above the economy's sustainable capacity would make it harder to absorb imported costs without broader price pressures.
Cheung writes: "At its July meeting, the MAS highlighted a projected widening of the positive output gap for 2026 as a whole-a situation we do not think has changed."
Inflation strengthens the case for another adjustment Crédit Agricole also highlights elevated oil prices as a continuing threat to imported costs.
MAS manages the Singapore Dollar against a basket of trading partners' currencies, using a faster appreciation path to restrain import prices and their spread into domestic inflation.
This is exchange-rate tightening, rather than a benchmark interest-rate rise.
Following April's tightening, MAS announced in its July policy decision: "MAS will therefore increase the rate of appreciation of the policy band very slightly."
It left the band's width and centre unchanged.
Cheung expects a similarly measured move: "Therefore, despite consecutive tightening, we think there is still scope for the MAS to tighten "very slightly" in October-the smaller increment introduced at its July meeting. Even if the MAS were to hold, we would expect a hawkish tilt."
US Dollar strength could delay Singapore Dollar gains Cheung writes: "The SGD has been a relative outperformer in Asia and is among the three regional currencies to have appreciated against the USD year-to-date, underpinned by Singapore's strong macro backdrop, foreign portfolio inflows and MAS tightening."
That assessment follows earlier ERUK coverage of the role of capital inflows and monetary policy in Singapore Dollar resilience.
Cheung estimates that the currency is already well into the upper half of the policy band: "MAS tightening should continue to keep the currency supported, with the SGD NEER currently positioned c.1.5% above the midpoint of the +/-2% policy band."
Those band parameters are the bank's estimates, rather than published MAS boundaries.
A firmer MAS stance can support Singapore's trade-weighted currency without ensuring that it rises against a strengthening US Dollar.
Cheung writes: "The greater risk for USD/SGD lies on the USD side, with the DXY rising to its highest level since Q225. We think the DXY could remain buoyed into end-2026 on the Fed rate hike dynamic before easing more substantially in 2027, leaving USD/SGD more rangebound around current levels."
Crédit Agricole's longer-term projection of USD/SGD at 1.25 by December 2027 allows for further Singapore Dollar gains as that US support fades.
The nearer 1.27 level is the bank's market assessment, not an official MAS boundary.
Cheung writes: "For now, 1.27 remains a strong floor, though we think this level could be tested as the USD weakens anew into 2027."
USD/SGD exchange rate FAQ When is the next MAS policy announcement?
The statement is scheduled for 14 October.
Does MAS tightening mean an interest-rate rise?
The expected adjustment is to the Singapore Dollar's appreciation path against a currency basket.
Is 1.27 an official USD/SGD limit?
No. It is Crédit Agricole's near-term market assessment. Its longer-term forecast is 1.25 by December 2027.
UBS očekává, že cena zlata do června 2027 dosáhne 5 200 USD za unci, podpořena nákupy centrálních bank a ETF. V krátkodobém horizontu však hrozí test úrovně 4 000 USD.
Gold Buyers Have Not Disappeared. Futures Investors Have Been Selling Gold's rebound faces a further test from US yields, but UBS and Crédit Agricole expect central-bank demand and fiscal concerns to support prices. The gold price recovery on Friday has steadied the market without removing the interest-rate pressure that UBS believes could drive another retreat towards $4,000 an ounce.
Spot gold closed near $4,195, up 1.2% on the day, as buyers extended Thursday's rebound.
UBS sees a much stronger market by mid-2027, forecasting $5,200 by June 2027, while Crédit Agricole expects a faster recovery over the remainder of this year.
The disagreement concerns the pace of the recovery, with both banks looking beyond the immediate competition from interest-bearing assets to demand from central banks and investors seeking protection against fiscal risks.
UBS strategist Giovanni Staunovo writes: "The gold price has fallen as rising US real yields and a stronger US dollar increase the opportunity cost of holding the metal. As a non-yielding asset, gold typically becomes less attractive when real US yields rise. These macroeconomic headwinds could persist in the near term, leaving prices vulnerable to another test of the USD 4,000/oz level."
For UBS, a more durable recovery depends partly on investors revising their expectations for Federal Reserve policy, reducing the inflation-adjusted return available on competing assets.
Image: Gold price (XAU) in USD over the last three months timeframe. ETF buyers have stayed while futures investors retreated The recent decline has not reflected a uniform withdrawal from gold.
Staunovo writes: "That said, ETF holdings have remained unusually resilient, with steady inflows in recent weeks. The decline in prices appears to have been driven by non-commercial accounts, which have reduced their net-long positions in gold futures and options."
The World Gold Council's September figures show physically backed ETF holdings rising by 67 tonnes despite the fall in prices.
Staunovo writes: "We continue to expect annual central bank purchases of 750-1,000 metric tons, providing an important source of structural support for gold."
That divergence gives UBS evidence for its longer-term view, while also showing why continued buying by one group cannot guarantee a rising market.
Selling through futures can outweigh physical investment flows over shorter periods, especially when changes in yields prompt investors to reduce speculative exposure.
Staunovo noted: "Still, we think gold has proved notably resilient to the sharp rise in yields. Its sensitivity to real rates has weakened, suggesting that structural demand is providing a stronger offset than in previous cycles. Central bank diversification, concerns about rising public debt levels and debt-servicing costs, our expectation of a weaker US dollar over time, and robust Chinese buying should continue to underpin the market. Meanwhile, demand in India should benefit from the upcoming festival season and lower prices."
Crédit Agricole expects more of the recovery this year For December 2026, Crédit Agricole forecasts $5,000 an ounce, $400 above UBS's target for the same date.
The difference places a greater burden on the timing of renewed demand in Crédit Agricole's outlook, with less than three months remaining before that forecast falls due.
Crédit Agricole's earlier case for $5,000 gold acknowledged that an immediate need for Dollars could force some official holders to sell, even as reserve diversification supported longer-term demand.
The bank's latest assessment retains that conditional view of renewed buying: "Central banks still see XAU as a primary tool to reduce their exposure to the USD given the attempts by the US to weaponise the currency. They could thus resume gold purchases especially if the global energy shock continues to fade. Concerns about fiscal dominance over the Fed could return as well, weigh on US real rates and help XAU recover."
That would change the significance of high government borrowing costs for gold.
Yields currently make bullion less attractive, but pressure to contain debt-servicing costs could eventually undermine confidence in monetary policy and increase demand for an asset outside the government bond market.
UBS's path depends on a substantial change in the interest-rate outlook from the one investors currently anticipate.
In its latest assessment, Staunovo writes: "Market participants are pricing in a bit more than 75 basis points of Fed rate hikes until the end of 2027. We expect the Fed to hike once more this year and cut rates twice by 25 basis points each in 2027."
Gold price outlook FAQ What is UBS's gold forecast?
UBS expects $5,200 an ounce by June 2027, while warning of another near-term test of $4,000.
Which bank is more bullish for December 2026?
Crédit Agricole's $5,000 target is $400 above UBS's forecast for the same date.
Why can gold fall while ETFs keep buying?
Selling elsewhere in the market and competition from higher real yields can outweigh ETF demand over shorter periods.
XAG/USD Forecast: UBS Recovery View Faces Yield Pressure Silver price rebound faces pressure from speculative selling and higher US real yields, Goldman Sachs warns, as UBS forecasts further gains in 2027. Silver prices rebounded on Friday, but UBS's forecast of $80 an ounce by September 2027 still depends on a substantial recovery from a market that has struggled to turn encouraging industrial indicators into sustained buying.
Spot silver closed near $60.83, up 2.2% on the day.
Robert Quinn, of Goldman Sachs FICC and Equities, writes: "Commitment of Traders encapsulating flows towards the end of September exhibited a large bearish turn in speculative positioning. Specifically, Managed Money, Other, and Non-Reportable net sold a combined $1.6bn from September 22nd - 29th, the largest weekly amount since February. Liquidation ($800mm) and new shorts ($800mm) contributed."
The estimate covers speculative positioning, rather than physical silver sales.
Half the selling closed bullish positions, while half established new bearish bets.
Image: Silver price in US dollars - three month chart Stronger industrial indicators have not overcome financial pressure Quinn's evidence for improving industrial prospects comes from equity-market indicators linked to sectors that use silver.
He writes: "Through early October, barometers for certain structural demand drivers improved. Over September 29th - October 7th, GS's Data Center and Solar equity baskets rose 4.2% and 2.4% respectively. Both maintained positive correlation with Managed Money gross long changes during the past 6 months."
These are equity-market indicators, rather than measurements of silver consumption.
During the same period, the financial conditions facing precious metals moved in the opposite direction.
Quinn writes: "However macroeconomic headwinds also proved formidable. Throughout the same time frame, US real rates edged higher and the Dollar increased (0.8%). Historically, stronger Dollar and real rate environments coincided with Managed Money gross long unwinds."
Higher inflation-adjusted yields increase the attraction of interest-bearing assets relative to silver, while a stronger Dollar raises the metal's cost for buyers using other currencies.
Quinn also identifies weakness in derivatives sentiment: "Thus in the end, the Silver price remained stuck with negative flows arguably persisting. Silver price fell 1.4%. Discretionary sentiment soured; consider normalized 25 delta put-call skew richened to the top 2 year decile. CTA selling also manifested, according to GS Futures Strategists' framework."
The options measure indicates stronger relative demand for downside protection, while Goldman's framework points to selling by systematic futures strategies.
UBS's recovery target faces an investment-demand test UBS's nearer forecast is $70 by December 2026, with further appreciation envisaged during 2027.
UBS has previously argued that higher gold prices and tighter physical conditions could support silver's recovery.
UBS said: "Silver, meanwhile, should benefit from higher gold prices and tighter near-term fundamentals."
More recent CFTC futures data for 6 October show managed-money investors still net long silver, but with that balance edging lower from the preceding week.
These futures-only figures cover a narrower group than Goldman's combined-category estimate.
Goldman sees a possible easing of one obstacle to recovery, rather than confirming that the selling has ended.
Quinn writes: "While acknowledging uncertainty over Middle East developments, note GS FX Research believes one pillar of Silver resistance, namely Dollar upside, could stall. Given stretched positioning on several pairs and recent Fed communication, the team is cautious on near-term Dollar prospects."
Silver price prediction, news FAQ What is UBS's silver forecast?
UBS forecasts $70 an ounce by December 2026 and $80 by September 2027.
Has Goldman Sachs issued an $80 silver target?
No. The $80 forecast belongs to UBS. Goldman's report analyses positioning and market pressures.
Was the $1.6bn selling a prediction?
No. Goldman estimates it occurred across the specified speculative categories during 22-29 September.
Injective [INJ] gained 10% in the early hours of the 10th of October as bullish trading activity picked up.
Perpetual buying pressure and spot exchange outflows supported the outlook, with traders showing renewed interest in the asset.
Alongside those moves, Injective’s updated white paper and ongoing exchange-traded fund (ETF) applications offered potential catalysts.
Are INJ buyers taking the lead? Across exchanges, INJ’s Taker Buy/Sell Ratio reached 1.14 over the preceding four hours. A reading above 1 indicates that taker buying volume exceeded taker selling volume, pointing to stronger aggressive buying.
However, the ratio measures executed trading volume rather than the number of outstanding long and short positions.
Source: CoinGlass The exchange breakdown showed buying accounted for more than half of recorded volume on several major venues. These included Binance, Bybit, Gate, BingX, Bitunix, and Hyperliquid.
Source: CoinGlass That supported the bullish reading across multiple platforms. The next question is how much exposure traders added alongside those purchases.
Is INJ’s rising exposure supporting the rally? INJ’s OI-Weighted Funding Rate stood at a positive 0.0160%, indicating that longs were paying shorts. That reading supported a bullish positioning bias, without establishing that long positions outnumbered shorts.
Meanwhile, Open Interest increased by $34.88 million to $164.24 million over 24 hours, showing a larger pool of outstanding contracts.
Source: CoinGlass Spot exchange flows offered another supportive signal. Cumulative Spot Netflow reached approximately -$1.6 million over five days. At press time on the 11th of October, Spot Netflow stood at -$311,000, the largest net outflow since the 9th.
Source: CoinGlass Negative Netflows meant more INJ left exchanges than entered them. Those withdrawals could suggest holders were moving tokens into custody, potentially reducing readily available exchange supply.
Still, exchange withdrawals alone cannot confirm fresh purchases. Together, the readings supported the bullish outlook while leaving buyers’ intentions partly open.
Can Injective’s developments sustain investor interest? Beyond trading activity, Injective published an updated white paper outlining its finance-focused development plans. Its regulatory work included publication of an INJ white paper under Europe’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).
That process was separate from U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversight, rather than a regulatory channel between the two.
Meanwhile, 21Shares and Canary pursued INJ ETF applications, offering another potential source of investor interest.
Injective CEO Eric Chen had suggested a launch could come before 2027, although that remained his expectation. Overall, these developments could help sustain interest. Further upside would still depend on demand holding beyond the initial rally.
Final Summary INJ gained 10%, while stronger taker buying, positive Funding Rates, and rising Open Interest supported bullish positioning. Exchange outflows and ongoing ETF applications added support, although withdrawals alone did not confirm fresh buying.
Předseda představenstva společnosti Mach Natural Resources William Wallace McMullen nakoupil 34 514 akcií za zhruba 389 000 USD poté, co akcie za předchozích 12 měsíců klesly o 16 %.
William Wallace McMullen, the Chairman of the Board, reported purchasing 34,514 shares of Mach Natural Resources LP (MNR +0.56%) on Sept. 15, 2026, according to a recent SEC Form 4 filing.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
55/100
Today's Change
(
0.56
%) $
0.06
Current Price
$
10.73
Transaction summaryMetricValueTransaction value~$389,000Shares purchased34,514Shares purchased (directly held)22,124Shares purchased (indirectly held)12,390Post-transaction shares (directly held)22,124Post-transaction shares (indirectly held)~74.9 millionPost-transaction value$838.8 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average purchase price ($11.27); post-transaction value based on Sept. 15, 2026 market close ($11.20).
Key questionsWhich entities hold the company's indirect shares?
The majority of the equity is held by BCE Mach Aggregator LLC, which is managed by Bayou City Energy Management LLC, where McMullen serves as Managing Partner.How has the stock performed leading up to this acquisition?
The purchase at $11.27 per share followed a negative 16% return for the stock over the 12 months ending Sept. 15, 2026.What is the current scale of direct versus indirect ownership for the insider?
Direct holdings account for a minimal portion of the position at 22,124 shares, while indirect holdings through affiliated entities total ~74.9 million shares.What is the company's core operational focus?
Mach Natural Resources operates as an independent firm in the upstream energy sector, focusing on the development and production of crude oil and natural gas within the Anadarko Basin.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-09-17)$10.97Market Capitalization$1.80 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.40 billionNet Income (TTM)$243.60 millionCompany SnapshotMach Natural Resources LP operates as an independent upstream oil and gas exploration and production company, generating revenue through the acquisition, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and associated liquids primarily within the Anadarko Basin.The company's business model centers on identifying and acquiring acreage with development potential, executing capital-efficient drilling and completion programs, and monetizing hydrocarbon reserves through sales to major integrated oil companies and independent refiners.The company's primary customers consist of major integrated oil and gas companies, independent refiners, and midstream infrastructure operators that purchase crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids produced from its Anadarko Basin operations.Mach Natural Resources LP is a mid-cap independent exploration and production company with a focused geographic footprint in the Anadarko Basin across Western Oklahoma, Southern Kansas, and the Texas Panhandle. The company generated $1.40 billion in revenue and $243.60 million in net income on a trailing twelve-month (TTM) basis, demonstrating operational profitability in the upstream energy sector. Founded in 2023 and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with 840 employees, Mach pursues a disciplined development strategy targeting conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations within one of North America's most prolific sedimentary basins.
What this transaction means for investorsThere are many reasons an insider may sell shares, some of which have no reflection on their belief in the stock's direction, like having to pay a large personal expense or diversifying their holdings.
There is only one reason an insider, like McMullen, buys shares: they believe the stock price will rise.
By that investor's rule of thumb, McMullen's purchase of Mach shares is inherently bullish. On top of that, studies show that, more often than not, an insider purchase predicts a higher share price 30 days later.
The business has been performing well. Mach has a history of strong cash returns on capital invested and cash distributions. Over the past 5 years, it delivered an industry-leading cash return on capital invested (CROCI), averaging 35%, not only industry-leading, but also in the top 1% of all public companies in the U.S. It has also distributed an industry-leading distribution yield of 15% since 2024 through the first quarter of 2026. Wall Street consensus sees revenue rising to $1.43 bllion in the current fiscal year, a rise of 22%.
McMullen founded Mach Natural Resources and the entity that holds a large portion of its shares, Bayou City Energy Management, in 2015, and has been an energy industry analyst and investor since at least 2008. Clearly, he knows the U.S. oil and gas business very well and certainly has his finger on the pulse of Mach's business. It is bullish that he is a buyer.
McMullen's buying now suggests he expects Mach Natural Resources to deliver strong performance this year. High oil prices benefit U.S. producers like Mach, especially since its costs basically haven't changed -- oil prices are rising due to the Iran war, which doesn't affect U.S. production. That means the stock is worth investigating to see if you want to add it to your portfolio.
Conflux (CFX) vzrostl přibližně o 28 % poté, co Čína oznámila plán na vybudování celostátní blockchainové sítě. Dokument nezmiňuje žádnou změnu omezení obchodování s kryptoměnami.
Following the Chinese government’s announcement of plans to establish a new blockchain network nationwide, Conflux (CFX), a Chinese-linked cryptocurrency project, experienced a sharp rise. The altcoin’s price increased by approximately 28%, and the volatility in trading volume was also noteworthy.
A policy document released on October 9 by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council outlines the goals of establishing a national blockchain network and a nationwide integrated computing power network.
Under the new plan, China aims to more comprehensively integrate blockchain technology into its national digital infrastructure. Data sharing, coordination of computing resources, and the development of the digital economy are among the government’s top priorities.
A document jointly released by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council of China explicitly states that establishing a national blockchain network is among the government’s goals.
The document, published under the title “Views on the Development of New Qualified Productive Forces,” states that the real economy and the digital economy need to be integrated more comprehensively. In this context, it is planned that the state will improve data infrastructure, accelerate digital transformation in the manufacturing sector, and support industrial internet projects.
The document also states that China will advance its “Processing Eastern Data in the West” project, establishing an integrated computing power network that connects data centers and computing resources across the country. The planned national blockchain network is expected to be one of the components of this vast digital infrastructure.
The statement did not mention Bitcoin, Ethereum, or any other cryptocurrency. Nor did it provide any information regarding whether the planned infrastructure would be a permissionless, publicly accessible blockchain with its own token.
Has China Lifted Its Cryptocurrency Ban? Therefore, the decision does not mean that China is changing its current approach to cryptocurrency trading or lifting its cryptocurrency bans. China has long restricted cryptocurrency transactions while supporting the development of permissioned blockchain technologies for government agencies, companies, and industrial applications.
The new network is likely to be used in areas such as sharing public data, digital identity, supply chain tracking, financial reconciliation, and verification of industry data. However, the document does not specify the network’s technical architecture, launch date, budget, or which institution will operate it.
The National Development and Reform Commission of China’s plan for the period 2026-2030 also envisioned the implementation of a “national blockchain network construction project.” The latest document confirms that this goal has been included in China’s economic transformation plan by the country’s top political and administrative institutions.
The Chinese government’s announcement has increased user interest in Conflux (CFX), which is being promoted as a public blockchain compliant with regulations in the country.
Market participants viewed Conflux as one of the projects that could benefit from China’s plan to expand its blockchain infrastructure, resulting in an approximately 28% increase in the CFX price.
According to shared market data, Conflux’s trading volume in the last 24 hours reached approximately $204 million, while its total market capitalization stands at $357 million. The fact that trading volume accounts for approximately 57% of market capitalization indicates significant buying and selling activity for the altcoin.
On the other hand, CFX’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) rose to 63. This value indicates that the upward momentum is strengthening, but shows that the price has not yet reached the overbought region, traditionally considered to be above 70.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and X account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
By You're currently following this author! Click to unsubscribe from email alerts.
Alexandr Wang's wild X feed seemed to lack any rhyme or reason, but the 29-year-old said it helped serve a broader purpose. Bloomberg/Getty Images Alexandr Wang said he had trouble focusing during recent Meta meetings.
On his mind: New memes to post about the company's popular new AI assistant.
"I would just like think of a meme and I'd be like 'Oh God, I have to get this out,'" Wang said in a recent interview with podcaster David Senra, adding that his coworkers were "somewhat surprised" at the buzz his posts were generating.
"It actually made an impact on growth," he said of the posts, "which is kind of hilarious."
Much has been said about Meta's chief AI officer and his chaotic X feed, which the 29-year-old has crammed with occasionally off-color yet invariably eccentric references to Muse, Meta's personal AI assistant that sent the company's stock soaring and redefined the market for AI tools.
In his interview with Senra, though, Wang said that his often spur-of-the-moment posts served a broader goal — to make Meta "cool again."
"Despite having like these incredible pieces of cultural software like Instagram and Facebook, historically, Meta was not cool," he said. "I remembered that the internet rewards risk."
After launching on September 8, Muse shot to the top of Apple's app store 10 days later, surpassing ChatGPT. Meta says Muse can help users research, fill out forms, buy items online, book restaurant reservations, find a dog sitter, and connect with services such as email, calendars, Spotify, Instagram, and OpenTable.
The app marked Meta's first successful breakthrough in AI tech, after its Llama and Spark LLM models failed to find niches already filled by widely used models from OpenAI and Anthropic.
With Muse, Meta found a largely untapped gold mine — though competing AI agents from OpenClaw and Instinct already existed in Silicon Valley circles. Muse, however, had the advantage of coming from a popular company with several billion potential customers already signed up on Instagram and Facebook.
And the internet, weary of staid pronouncements from CEOs who were perhaps once cool but are now entering their 40s (Mark Zuckerberg is 42), welcomed the boundless energy of a young executive newly endowed with power in the AI era.
"It was a lot of fun," Wang said. "There were like a few tweets where I just didn't think that much about it and just said, 'Fuck it, post.'"
Business Insider wants to know, by the way, how you're using personal AI agents. Take our survey below!
Read next
Truman Dickerson You're currently following this author! Click to unsubscribe from email alerts.
Truman Dickerson is the Weekend News Fellow at Business Insider, based in New York City. He covers trending tech and business news. He previously reported for The Boston Globe's Express Desk. He graduated from Boston University, where he served as editor in chief of The Daily Free Press, BU's student-run newspaper.Contact him at [email protected]
Qualcomm se obchoduje za 26násobek očekávaného zisku oproti 15násobku u společnosti Nvidia a 22násobku u společnosti Broadcom, přestože analytici očekávají pomalejší růst tržeb.
Qualcomm (QCOM -0.29%) isn't often mentioned in the same breath as AI leaders like Nvidia (NVDA -0.52%) and Broadcom (AVGO +0.39%). It's one of the world's largest mobile chipmakers. Still, its AI-oriented chips haven't attracted nearly as much attention as Nvidia's data center GPUs or Broadcom's custom AI accelerators for hyperscalers.
Qualcomm's stock has still risen 40% over the past five years, but shares of Nvidia and Broadcom have rallied about 1,000% and 630%, respectively. However, Qualcomm still doesn't look cheap relative to those AI leaders for three simple reasons.
Image source: Getty Images.
1. Its AI strategy has limited growth potential Qualcomm's main AI strategy is to add edge AI (on-device processing) features to its existing chips. The latest versions of its Snapdragon chips -- which power mobile devices, wearables, vehicles, and PCs -- process AI tasks locally instead of relying on cloud-based services.
These edge AI chips are innovative, but they primarily target budget-constrained consumer device manufacturers, which ultimately limits their pricing power and the total addressable market. By comparison, Nvidia and Broadcom produce AI chips for hyperscalers, which are spending hundreds of billions of dollars to expand their cloud-based AI infrastructure.
Qualcomm is trying to expand into the data center market with its Cloud AI 100 and next-gen AI accelerators for inference tasks, but it could struggle to stand out in that crowded market.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
80/100
Today's Change
(
-0.29
%) $
-0.51
Current Price
$
175.50
2. It's growing at a much slower rate than its AI peers From fiscal 2025 (which ended last September) to fiscal 2028, analysts expect Qualcomm's revenue and EPS to grow at CAGRs of 6% and 27%, respectively. That growth trajectory is healthy, but it pales in comparison to its hyperscaler-driven AI peers.
From fiscal 2026 (which ended this January) to fiscal 2029, analysts expect Nvidia's revenue and EPS to both grow at CAGRs of 61%. From fiscal 2025 (which ended last November) to fiscal 2028, they expect Broadcom's revenue and EPS to grow at CAGRs of 62% and 80%, respectively. We should take those estimates with a grain of salt, but they indicate that Qualcomm's focus on edge AI chips will limit its long-term growth.
3. It's still more expensive than Nvidia and Broadcom Qualcomm underperformed Nvidia and Broadcom by a wide margin over the past few years, but it's still fundamentally more expensive relative to its future earnings.
As of this writing, Qualcomm trades at 26 times next year's earnings, while Nvidia and Broadcom trade at 15 and 22 times next year's earnings, respectively. Most investors will look at those multiples and buy Nvidia and Broadcom instead of Qualcomm -- and that trend will likely continue unless Qualcomm makes more progress in the data center market.
Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Broadcom, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Akcie společnosti Freeport-McMoRan se obchodují za poměr P/E 35 oproti pětiletému průměru 22, přestože rostoucí poptávka po mědi podporuje její výhled.
It's a good time to be a copper investor. Copper is needed for data centers, and data centers are proliferating across the U.S. Copper is needed for wind turbines, too, and electric vehicles reportedly use up to four times as much copper as traditional cars. The International Energy Agency (IEA) is estimating that global copper demand will jump some 17%, from 26.7 million tonnes in 2024 to 31.3 million tonnes by 2030.
Could investing in a copper-mining company set you up for life? How about Freeport-McMoRan (FCX +3.58%)? It describes itself as "dedicated to positively contributing to society by supplying the world with copper -- Responsibly, Reliably and Relentlessly." It sports a portfolio of long-lived copper assets around the world. (It also produces gold and molybdenum, but its primary focus is on copper.)
Image source: Getty Images.
Indeed, its portfolio features the Grasberg mine in Indonesia -- the world's second-largest copper mine and largest gold mine. In 2025, Freeport-McMoRan produced 3.4 billion pounds of copper, accounting for about 70% of U.S. refined copper production.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
68/100
Today's Change
(
3.58
%) $
2.55
Current Price
$
73.69
It clearly looks like a great buy, right? Well, maybe not. Its valuation is on the steep side. Its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio was recently 35, well above the five-year average of 22, and its price-to-sales ratio of 4.0 was also well above the five-year average of 2.6. It's smart to buy into healthy and growing companies, but you don't want to do so at a high price.
I would be careful about investing in the company at recent levels. The more overvalued a stock is, the less likely it is to set you up for life.
You might instead add it to your watch list, waiting for a pullback -- because it does seem like demand for copper is growing, and copper specialists should profit from that. Or maybe start a small position in it if you're really bullish on it. (There are other copper-related companies to learn about and consider.)
Consider copper-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs), too -- such as the Global X Copper Miners ETF, which encompasses 40 companies, including Freeport-McMoRan.
Selena Maranjian has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
FuelCell Energy ve 3. fiskálním čtvrtletí 2026 vykázala čistou ztrátu 45,3 mil. USD a zaúčtovala náklad ve výši 17 mil. USD v souvislosti se smlouvou CEPA se společností Fit Energy.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In FuelCell To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in FuelCell between June 24, 2026 and September 1, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 11, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against FuelCell Energy, Inc. ("FuelCell" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: FCEL) and reminds investors of the November 10, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) that the Company's manufacturing capacity was inadequate to generate the production rate required under the CEPA; (2) that, as a result, the Company's annualized production rate for deliveries under the CEPA with Fit Energy was slower than expected; (3) that, as a result, the Company was incurring higher product costs and manufacturing overhead expenses; (4) that, as a result of the slower production rate, the Company was reasonably likely to incur charges in connection with the CEPA; (5) that the foregoing was a known trend affecting the Company's profitability; and (6) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
On September 2, 2026, before the market opened, FuelCell reported its fiscal third quarter 2026 financial results, reporting a net loss of $45.3 million. According to the Company's press release, this reflected "a higher gross loss than the prior year period," which was caused by "product costs and manufacturing overhead that currently exceed the contractual pricing established under the CEPA with Fit Energy." Further, FuelCell reported that the annualized production rate was "below the production volume at which we expect our cost structure to align with market-based pricing for orders of this scale," and as a result, the Company recorded a $17 million charge to "reflect the impact of contractual pricing provisions associated with specific inventory and firm purchase commitments" arising from Phase 0 of the CEPA.
On this news, FuelCell shares fell $2.68, or 15.69%, to close at $14.40 per share on September 2, 2026, thereby injuring investors.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding FuelCell's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the FuelCell Energy class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/FCEL or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the FuelCell Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the FuelCell securities fraud lawsuit about?
The lawsuit alleges FuelCell Energy misled investors about its manufacturing capacity, production rates, costs, and financial risks associated with its CEPA with Fit Energy.
Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ: FCEL) securities between June 24, 2026 and September 1, 2026 may be eligible if they suffered losses.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?
A lead plaintiff represents the proposed class during the litigation. Eligible investors must file a motion with the court by November 10, 2026. Investors may participate without serving as lead plaintiff.
Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased FuelCell securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/318350
Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Tržby Applied Materials z prodeje zařízení vzrostly v první polovině roku 2026 jen o 1,0 %, zatímco u Lam Research o 23,3 %, u KLA o 12,6 % a u ASML o 13,3 %.
Global chip equipment spending is surging toward $144 billion, yet one of the industry's biggest names is growing at a fraction of its rivals' pace, putting its long-term position in the market under serious pressure.
Worldwide wafer fabrication equipment spending is projected to increase 23.1% to $143.9 billion in 2026, following a record $116.9 billion in 2025 Applied Materials’ global equipment market share declined from 20.0% in 2024 to 17.9% in 2025, while Lam Research, KLA and ASML gained share Applied Materials’ equipment revenue increased only 1.0% during the first half of 2026, compared with double-digit growth at its three major competitors, raising questions about its ability to recover market share Applied Materials Faces a Market Share Challenge The global semiconductor equipment industry is experiencing another major expansion, supported by artificial intelligence infrastructure investment, high-bandwidth memory, advanced logic manufacturing and increasingly complex semiconductor architectures. Worldwide wafer fabrication equipment (WFE) sales are projected to increase 23.1% to $143.9 billion in 2026, following a record $116.9 billion in 2025. The forecast reflects continued investment in the manufacturing technologies required to support the next generation of semiconductor devices.
However, the expansion is not benefiting every equipment manufacturer equally. Applied Materials (AMAT | AMAT Price Prediction), historically one of the industry’s largest and most diversified suppliers, has experienced a significant deterioration in its global market share. Its competitors, including Lam Research (LRCX), KLA (KLAC) and ASML (ASML), have demonstrated substantially stronger revenue growth during the latest first-half comparisons.
According to proprietary data from The Information Network, Applied Materials’ global WFE market share declined from 20.0% in 2024 to 17.9% in 2025, representing a loss of 2.1 percentage points. During the same period, Lam Research increased its share from 9.1% to 11.2%, KLA advanced from 7.9% to 8.2%, and ASML recovered from 22.4% to 23.0%.
The concern for investors is that Applied Materials’ equipment revenue increased only 1.0% during the first half of 2026 compared with the corresponding period in 2025. This contrasts sharply with the growth recorded by its major competitors and raises questions about whether Applied Materials can participate proportionately in the industry’s projected expansion.
The distinction is particularly important because the five largest semiconductor equipment manufacturers collectively account for a substantial majority of global WFE revenue. Their combined revenue is projected to increase from approximately $83.2 billion in 2025 to $113.6 billion in 2026, representing growth of approximately 36.5%. This is considerably faster than the projected 23.1% expansion of the worldwide market, suggesting that the industry’s largest suppliers could collectively increase their market share.
For Applied Materials, however, the question is whether its own revenue performance will improve sufficiently to participate in that shift.
A Continuing Shift in Semiconductor Equipment Market Share Applied Materials’ market share deterioration is not an isolated development. Its global WFE market share reached 22.2% in 2016, declined to 18.1% in 2019, and subsequently recovered to approximately 20.0% in 2022. That recovery has not been sustained, with its share falling to 17.9% in 2025.
The recent decline is particularly significant because the semiconductor equipment market has benefited from increased investment in advanced logic, memory and packaging technologies. Applied Materials participates in many of these markets through deposition, materials engineering, ion implantation and other process technologies. Nevertheless, its overall market share performance indicates that its revenue growth has not consistently matched the industry’s expansion.
According to Table 1, Applied Materials’ global WFE market share remained approximately stable between 2023 and 2024 before declining sharply in 2025. Lam Research experienced the opposite trajectory, increasing from 8.5% in 2023 to 11.2% in 2025. KLA also gained share, while ASML recovered in 2025 after declining in 2024. The 2026 projections illustrate the market share recovery that would be possible if the manufacturers achieve their respective full-year revenue forecasts.
Table 1. Global Semiconductor Equipment Market Share, 2023–2026 Company 2023 2024 2025 2026 Forecast Applied Materials (AMAT) 19.9% 20.0% 17.9% 20.4% Lam Research (LRCX) 8.5% 9.1% 11.2% 13.2% KLA (KLAC) 7.4% 7.9% 8.2% 8.3% ASML (ASML) 24.2% 22.4% 23.0% 25.2% Source: The Information Network. Historical market shares through 2025; 2026 projections calculated from supplied company revenue growth forecasts and worldwide WFE growth of 23.1%. The projected improvement in Applied Materials’ market share from 17.9% in 2025 to 20.4% in 2026 would require a substantial acceleration in its equipment revenue growth. Its full-year revenue projection assumes approximately 40% growth, a sharp contrast with the 1.0% increase recorded during the first half of 2026.
This difference between projected annual growth and actual first-half performance is central to evaluating the company’s outlook. The market share forecast demonstrates what Applied Materials could achieve under a strong recovery scenario, but its recent revenue performance provides limited evidence that such an acceleration is already underway.
The forecasts also indicate that the largest equipment manufacturers could capture a greater proportion of worldwide spending. However, these projections depend on the companies achieving their respective revenue targets and on maintaining consistent definitions between reported equipment revenue and the global WFE market.
First-Half 2026 Revenue Growth Reinforces the Competitive Divergence The competitive differences become more apparent when examining semiconductor equipment revenue growth during the first halves of 2025 and 2026.
Applied Materials’ equipment revenue increased 8.7% during the first half of 2025 compared with the corresponding period in 2024. However, its full-year 2025 equipment revenue increased only approximately 2%, coinciding with its 2.1-percentage-point market share decline.
During the first half of 2026, Applied Materials’ equipment revenue growth slowed further to just 1.0%. In contrast, Lam Research, KLA and ASML continued to report substantially stronger growth.
According to Table 2, Lam Research’s equipment revenue increased 23.3% during the first half of 2026, compared with 12.6% for KLA and 13.3% for ASML. The three manufacturers averaged 16.4% growth, substantially exceeding Applied Materials’ performance.
Table 2. Semiconductor Equipment Revenue Growth, First-Half Comparisons Company 1H 2025 vs. 1H 2024 1H 2026 vs. 1H 2025 Applied Materials (AMAT) +8.7% +1.0% Lam Research (LRCX) +41.8% +23.3% KLA (KLAC) +30.7% +12.6% ASML (ASML) +30.1% +13.3% Competitor Average +34.2% +16.4% Source: The Information Network. Competitor average represents the unweighted average of Lam Research, KLA and ASML Although revenue growth slowed across all four manufacturers, Applied Materials’ performance remained substantially weaker than that of its competitors. Its first-half 2026 growth was only a small fraction of the increases recorded by Lam Research, KLA and ASML.
This divergence raises questions about the assumptions underlying the company’s projected full-year recovery. If Applied Materials is to increase its equipment revenue approximately 40% in 2026, its second-half performance would need to accelerate dramatically from the first-half growth rate.
That acceleration is mathematically possible, particularly if equipment shipments and customer investments are heavily weighted toward the latter part of the year. However, investors should distinguish between a forecast that assumes strong second-half growth and evidence that such growth is materializing.
The company’s recent market share deterioration also illustrates the consequences of falling behind the overall industry. Applied Materials lost 2.1 percentage points of global WFE share in 2025 despite reporting positive equipment revenue growth. If its 2026 performance remains below the projected 23.1% expansion of worldwide WFE spending, further market share erosion would follow.
Why Lam Research, KLA and ASML Are Better Positioned The semiconductor equipment market is undergoing a structural transition as chipmakers adopt gate-all-around transistors, advanced DRAM architectures, higher-layer-count 3D NAND and increasingly sophisticated packaging technologies. These developments increase the importance of specific manufacturing processes, creating opportunities for suppliers with strong positions in those categories.
Lam Research benefits from growing etch and deposition requirements in advanced memory and logic manufacturing. Increasing NAND layer counts, more demanding DRAM structures and new transistor architectures require sophisticated processing technologies. Lam’s global WFE market share increased from 8.5% in 2023 to 11.2% in 2025, demonstrating its ability to capture a larger portion of equipment spending. Its first-half 2026 revenue growth of 23.3% also provides evidence of continued competitive momentum.
KLA benefits from the increasing importance of semiconductor inspection, metrology and process control. Advanced manufacturing requires tighter process tolerances and more sophisticated defect detection to maintain acceptable yields. KLA’s global market share increased from 5.9% in 2018 to 8.2% in 2025, reflecting the growing importance of these capabilities. Its competitive position becomes increasingly valuable as semiconductor structures become more difficult to manufacture.
ASML occupies a different position through its dominance in extreme ultraviolet lithography. The transition toward advanced logic nodes increases demand for sophisticated lithography systems, supporting ASML’s long-term growth. Its global WFE market share increased from 15.5% in 2015 to 23.0% in 2025, although annual results fluctuate with equipment delivery schedules and customer investment.
Applied Materials also participates in many of the technologies driving equipment demand. Its deposition, materials engineering and other process technologies remain essential to semiconductor manufacturing, while advanced packaging provides additional opportunities. Nevertheless, the company’s recent revenue performance suggests that these opportunities have not yet translated into growth comparable to that of its principal competitors.
For investors, the distinction between participation in growing markets and capturing a larger share of those markets remains critical. Companies with strong positions in the most rapidly expanding manufacturing processes may benefit disproportionately from the current equipment investment cycle.
China’s Domestic Equipment Expansion Adds Competitive Pressure Applied Materials also faces growing competition from Chinese semiconductor equipment manufacturers, which are expanding their presence in deposition, etch, cleaning and other manufacturing processes.
According to The Information Network, six leading Chinese equipment manufacturers recorded average first-half 2026 revenue growth of 35.6%, compared with 11.4% for seven major non-Chinese manufacturers. These figures represent unweighted company averages rather than aggregate market growth rates, but they illustrate the momentum of China’s domestic equipment industry.
Piotech recorded first-half revenue growth of 49.1%, followed by Hwatsing at 35.6%, ACM Research at 35.2%, AMEC at 34.9%, Skyverse at 34.0% and NAURA at 24.9%. Their expansion reflects continued investment in domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities and efforts to increase the use of locally manufactured equipment.
However, Chinese manufacturers still account for less than 10% of worldwide semiconductor equipment revenue. Their rapid growth therefore cannot independently explain major market share shifts among the industry’s largest international suppliers. Those changes also reflect differences in technology exposure, product demand and the distribution of capital spending across manufacturing processes.
For Applied Materials, the competitive challenge comes from both directions. Chinese suppliers are expanding their participation in domestic equipment spending, while established international manufacturers continue to benefit from strong positions in critical advanced manufacturing technologies.
Investor Takeaway The semiconductor equipment industry remains one of the principal beneficiaries of artificial intelligence infrastructure investment, advanced memory manufacturing and continued semiconductor technology development. With worldwide WFE revenue projected to increase 23.1% to $143.9 billion in 2026, the industry offers substantial opportunities for manufacturers capable of capturing incremental capital spending. However, The Information Network’s historical data demonstrate that Applied Materials has struggled to maintain its competitive position. Its global market share declined from 20.0% in 2024 to 17.9% in 2025, while Lam Research, KLA and ASML all gained share during that year.
The first-half 2026 revenue comparisons raise additional concerns. Applied Materials’ equipment revenue increased just 1.0%, compared with 23.3% for Lam Research, 12.6% for KLA and 13.3% for ASML. Although the full-year projections indicate that Applied Materials could recover market share to approximately 20.4% if its equipment revenue increases 40%, achieving that outcome would require a substantial acceleration during the remainder of 2026. The discrepancy between actual first-half performance and the projected full-year recovery is therefore a critical issue for investors evaluating the company’s competitive position.
For investors, the semiconductor equipment industry’s expansion remains attractive, but company selection is increasingly important. Lam Research’s recent market share gains and revenue growth make it particularly well positioned, while KLA’s process control capabilities and ASML’s lithography leadership provide important competitive advantages. Applied Materials remains an important industry supplier, but its investment case increasingly depends on demonstrating that its broad technology portfolio can generate revenue growth comparable to the overall market. Until that improvement becomes evident, the possibility of further market share erosion remains an important consideration in evaluating the stock.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Rocket Lab zvýšil ve 2. čtvrtletí 2026 tržby meziročně o 62 % na rekordních 235 milionů USD; klíčovým rizikem zůstává možné zpoždění prvního letu rakety Neutron.
Rocket Lab (RKLB -0.28%) has quickly become one of the more interesting names in the space race. With several growth drivers ahead, the company has many reasons to deliver huge upside. Below are three catalysts that could send the stock sharply higher by the end of 2027, along with the one risk that could hold it back.
Image source: Getty Images.
Rocket Lab is becoming a serious defense player One of the more interesting parts of the Rocket Lab investment case is its growing exposure to defense spending around space. For example, the company has already secured more than $1.3 billion of Space Development Agency awards to build and operate military satellite constellations.
The company is also developing satellites with internally manufactured components. That vertical integration, which means Rocket Lab builds many of its own parts rather than relying on outside suppliers, could be an edge. Rather than simply selling launches, it can offer governments a complete package covering satellites, payloads, and space infrastructure.
Plus, the company's Haste platform gives it exposure to hypersonic missile testing and research, while the new Ghost launch system is expected to begin operations from Alaska in 2027. With that, it is participating in several of the biggest themes in defense all at once: missile defense, satellite networks, and space infrastructure for national security.
But while defense is turning into a key growth driver, the company has an even bigger catalyst in the pipeline.
The Neutron could open a much larger market Rocket Lab's most exciting potential catalyst is still the Neutron, its reusable medium-lift rocket. Electron, the company's small-lift rocket, established the business as a credible launch provider, but the Neutron could move the company into a much larger and potentially more lucrative market. On top of that, it could even open doors to national security missions and launch major satellite constellations.
Management is already seeing demand even before the Neutron's launch. For example, the company has secured several commitments, including a major 2026 agreement covering five Neutron launches. And it signed a $397 million Space Force contract under which it will provide both spacecraft and launch services.
That said, a successful Neutron program wouldn't simply add another rocket to the lineup. Instead, it could allow the company to secure larger contracts. And it isn't the only thing working in Rocket Lab's favor right now.
The existing business keeps getting stronger Even before the Neutron takes flight, the company has been performing strongly. In the second quarter of 2026, revenue reached a record $235 million, up 62% year over year, while its backlog reached a record $2.4 billion. On top of that, it secured more than $1 billion of additional contracts across launch and space systems around the start of the third quarter.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
79/100
Today's Change
(
-0.28
%) $
-0.19
Current Price
$
68.21
Launches of the Electron also continue to ramp up. For example, the Japanese company Synspective's September mission was its 96th overall Electron launch and 17th mission of 2026.
That's a third reason to be optimistic about Rocket Lab in 2027, and it provides a cushion in case the Neutron runs into problems. However, that cushion doesn't erase the single biggest risk to the investment case.
Neutron's first flight could still be at risk The biggest obstacle is execution around the Neutron. Rocket Lab was previously eyeing a 2026 debut, but by August, the company was targeting delivery of the rocket to the launchpad in the fourth quarter rather than committing to a first flight. As a result, that could signal a potential delay.
Still, that doesn't change the long-term thesis. In fact, the company has already proved that customers are willing to commit to the Neutron even before its first launch. But a successful first launch, followed by reliable operations and a consistent launch cadence, would be crucial for the stock to outperform in 2027.
That tension, between a core business that's firing on all cylinders and a rocket program still finding its footing, is exactly what investors need to weigh.
Is the stock a buy right now? The case for owning the stock is only getting stronger. Expanding defense contracts, a growing launch business, and the Neutron's first flight give the company several paths to growth. That said, the catch is that execution around Neutron still matters. Looking ahead, if Rocket Lab delivers on its ambitious road map, shares could realistically climb toward twice their current value by 2027.
Peter Beck has a bold plan to turn Rocket Lab into a self-launching tier-1 space power, but reaching the price target that would prove him right requires several high-stakes moves to land perfectly.
Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB | RKLB Price Prediction) has built a track record of building and flying rockets. Now its founder and CEO, Peter Beck, wants a much bigger role. When he announced the Iridium Communications (NASDAQ:IRDM) acquisition, Beck said the deal sets up Rocket Lab as “a self-launching, tier-1 space power that will deliver critical communications capability to millions of users worldwide.” Iridium stockholders approved the deal in September.
The stock has fallen behind the business. Shares are down 2.22% year to date at $68.21, even though Q2 revenue rose 62% to a record. Several things need to go right for Rocket Lab to reach $125 per share in 2027.
Wall Street Already Sees 56% Upside The average analyst target is $106.57, which implies 56% upside. Ratings stand at 4 Strong Buy, 12 Buy, 4 Hold and zero Sell. Rocket Lab has exceeded revenue estimates in each of the last 4 quarters. Q2 EPS of -$0.08 missed the -$0.0767 estimate, but that figure included $8.58M in acquisition costs. Backlog reached $2.36B, up 137%, and Q3 revenue guidance is $250M-$265M.
Here’s What It Takes to Reach $125 Rocket Lab isn’t profitable yet, so price-to-sales is the better metric. Shares trade at 56.7x trailing sales. At $125, that multiple would rise to roughly 104x. That’s a big premium, but it is close to the 93x investors pay for SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX). SpaceX posted $7.81B in Q2 revenue, and $648M of that came from launch services. Launch alone is a large market.
How Rocket Lab might reach $125.
Neutron’s debut: Neutron is Rocket Lab’s reusable medium-lift rocket, and its starting price of $50 million to $55 million puts it head-to-head with Falcon 9. CNBC reported that management expects boosters to fly 10 to 20 times each. Beck put it bluntly: “Neutron demand is just not a concern.” Defense spending: The FY2027 budget includes $17.9 billion for Golden Dome. Rocket Lab already holds an $816M Space Development Agency contract and a $397M Flatellite award. Iridium: Iridium generated more than $870 million in annual revenue, and the deal is expected to close in mid-2027. Margin gains: Non-GAAP gross margin rose to 41.5% from 36.9%. The adjusted EBITDA loss shrank to $8.8M from $27.6M. The Neutron launch can change the dynamic and make Rocket Lab a viable challenger to SpaceX. With the cost per launch expected to fall from around $130 million to $50 million as volume ramps higher, it would make Rocket Lab a profitable alternative to its rival.
Key risks: Neutron’s maiden year-end launch window is narrowing, and Rocket Lab raised $1.53B by selling stock in the first half of 2026, which dilutes existing shareholders.
Shares Topped $125 Within the Past Year Reaching $125 requires an 83% gain. The stock has already traded above that level: its 52-week range runs from $37.57 to $151, a swing of about 302%. With a beta of 2.938, Rocket Lab is likely to move far more than the overall market. Over five years, shares have gained 363.7%.
$125 Is a Stretch, but Within Reach Hitting $125 would take an 83% gain in 2027. Analysts already see 56% upside, the backlog keeps hitting records, and Neutron could start competing directly with SpaceX. Execution risk is real. Still, returns at this level are unlikely every year, and this is the model for how Rocket Lab could deliver outsized returns in 2027.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Kryptoprojekty během příštích 30 dnů odemknou tokeny v hodnotě zhruba 1,139 miliardy USD. Pump během 24 hodin uvolní tokeny v hodnotě 38,17 milionu USD, což odpovídá 1,49 % jeho tržní kapitalizace.
$291.61 million in token unlocks are scheduled over the next seven days. Aptos has released just 41.18% of its tracked supply. Pump faces a $38.17 million near-term unlock, equivalent to 1.49% of its market cap. Historical post-unlock returns show sharply different outcomes across tokens. Crypto projects are scheduled to unlock approximately $1.139 billion in tokens over the next 30 days, with several concentrated release dates creating potential tests for market liquidity.
DefiLlama data captured on October 11 shows $291.61 million scheduled over the coming week across a universe of 370 tracked protocols.
The aggregate figure provides a measure of upcoming supply, but individual projects face substantially different exposure. Aptos has a relatively small near-term unlock against its market capitalization but a large proportion of supply still restricted. Pump faces a considerably larger immediate release, while Solana has already unlocked nearly 90% of its tracked allocation.
Those differences make project-level analysis more useful than the monthly total.
Pump’s Near-Term Unlock Is Four Times Larger Than Aptos’s Pump (PUMP) has approximately $38.17 million in tokens scheduled to unlock within 24 hours, according to the supplied DefiLlama snapshot.
Against its reported market capitalization of $2.568 billion, the release represents approximately 1.49% of market value.
Aptos (APT) faces a $9.48 million cliff unlock, equivalent to approximately 1.30% of its $730.98 million market capitalization.
The absolute difference is substantial, but the relative market-cap exposure is much closer.
Supply Analysis
Upcoming Token Unlock Exposure
Token / Next 24h
Unlock / Market Cap
PUMP
$38.17M unlock
MCap $2.568B
1.49%
APT
$9.48M unlock
MCap $730.98M
1.30%
SOL
$4.22M unlock
MCap $64.44B
0.0065%
TIA
$248,431 unlock
MCap $577.04M
0.043%
Source: DefiLlama, October 11, 2026. Ratios compare next 24-hour unlock values with reported market capitalizations, not trading liquidity.
Calculations use the prices, market capitalizations and unlock amounts shown in the October 11 DefiLlama screenshots. Ratios are rounded.
The comparison is particularly revealing for Solana. Its scheduled release is worth millions of dollars, but the amount is extremely small relative to its reported market capitalization.
Pump and Aptos present more concentrated near-term supply events.
Market capitalization is not the same as available trading liquidity, however. A token can have a large valuation and relatively shallow order books, making the relationship between unlock size and actual trading volume important.
Aptos Has a Longer-Term Dilution Problem to Monitor Aptos has released 41.18% of its tracked supply, compared with 52.63% for Pump and 89.94% for Solana.
That leaves 58.82% of the tracked Aptos allocation not yet unlocked under DefiLlama’s methodology.
The percentage is significant for long-term valuation because future releases can increase the amount of supply available to trade.
It does not mean all remaining tokens will enter circulation this year, nor does it establish that their recipients will sell.
Aptos also has a scheduled cliff event, which differs from a linear vesting programme. Cliff releases make a specified allocation available at once, while linear vesting distributes tokens over a period.
For APT, the relevant research questions are therefore not limited to the next $9.48 million event. Investors also need to examine the remaining vesting schedule, recipient categories and the frequency of future releases.
The supplied screenshots do not identify the beneficiaries of the upcoming Aptos allocation, so attributing it to insiders, investors or ecosystem incentives would be speculative.
How Much Trading Activity Is Needed to Absorb an Unlock? One useful measure is the ratio between the value of an upcoming release and the token’s average daily spot trading volume.
Unlock-to-volume ratio = Unlock value ÷ Average daily spot trading volume × 100 For example, a $10 million unlock against $100 million in daily spot volume produces a 10% ratio.
The same release against $20 million in daily volume produces a 50% ratio, suggesting a larger potential liquidity challenge.
These are illustrative calculations, not observed trading figures for Aptos or Pump.
The metric also has limitations. Reported volume does not represent guaranteed buy-side liquidity, and a large proportion of trading may be concentrated on a small number of exchanges.
Order-book depth, spreads and exchange inflows provide additional information about whether new supply is reaching the market.
A practical assessment should therefore combine unlock-to-volume exposure with the size of the release relative to market capitalization and the identity of the recipients.
Previous Unlocks Produced Both Gains and Losses Historical performance in the DefiLlama snapshot complicates the assumption that token releases consistently precede price declines.
The platform’s seven-day post-unlock analysis shows:
Historical Performance
Seven-Day Returns After Unlocks
Token
7D Price Change
Solana (SOL)
▲ 80.24%
peaq (PEAQ)
▲ 16.65%
Pump (PUMP)
▲ 11.80%
Celestia (TIA)
▲ 5.55%
Canton (CC)
▼ 4.17%
Aptos (APT)
▼ 6.87%
Source: DefiLlama, October 11, 2026. Historical seven-day returns are not adjusted for broader market movements and do not establish causation.
These returns describe price performance during the periods tracked by DefiLlama. They are not isolated measurements of the unlocks’ effects.
Solana’s particularly large gain, for instance, cannot be attributed to a token release without controlling for broader market movements and project-specific developments.
The data is more useful as evidence of dispersion: the direction and magnitude of post-unlock returns vary considerably.
The Calendar Contains Two Large Supply Clusters The daily unlock chart from TokenomistAI identifies a peak above $100 million in late October and another near $95 million around the beginning of November.
These clusters deserve closer examination because several projects may release tokens within the same period.
An aggregate daily total cannot reveal whether the exposure is concentrated in one large-cap token or distributed among smaller projects.
The next analytical step is to identify which protocols account for those peaks and compare their scheduled releases against spot trading volumes.
The October 11 snapshot establishes the scale and timing of the upcoming supply events. It does not provide sufficient evidence to forecast their price impact.
For the immediate week, Pump and Aptos warrant separate treatment: Pump because of the size of its near-term release, and Aptos because a majority of its tracked supply remains locked.
Alexander Zdravkov is a crypto journalist and market analyst specializing in digital assets, blockchain technology, and the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency market. He entered the industry more than four years ago, drawn to the speed of innovation in crypto and the potential of blockchain-based financial systems to reshape traditional markets. His work focuses on understanding the forces behind crypto market movements, from Bitcoin and altcoin cycles to institutional adoption, regulation, exchange-traded products, stablecoins, DeFi, and emerging blockchain ecosystems. Rather than simply following price action, Alexander looks at liquidity, investor positioning, market structure, and macroeconomic conditions to identify developing trends and explain what they could mean for digital assets. With a degree in International Relations, he brings a broader perspective to cryptocurrency coverage by connecting developments in the sector with monetary policy, geopolitics, regulation, and global capital flows. This allows him to examine crypto not as an isolated market, but as an increasingly interconnected part of the global financial system. Over the course of more than five years in financial journalism, Alexander has written over 5,000 articles covering cryptocurrencies, blockchain, traditional markets, and the global economy. His reporting spans Bitcoin, Ethereum and altcoins, DeFi protocols, institutional crypto adoption, regulation, market infrastructure, security incidents, and major developments shaping the wider digital asset industry. His approach is centered on giving readers context behind the numbers and headlines, explaining not only what is happening in crypto markets, but why it matters and what could come next.
EQT těží z rekordní poptávky po plynu díky akvizici společnosti Blackline Midstream, rozšíření plynovodu Mountain Valley Pipeline a dlouhodobým smlouvám na dodávky do datových center.
SummaryEQT Corporation, the largest U.S. natural gas producer, is well-positioned for growth amid record demand and robust infrastructure.EQT's vertical integration, contiguous land holdings, and economies of scale drive operational efficiency and competitive advantage.Key catalysts include the Blackline Midstream acquisition, Mountain Valley Pipeline expansions, and long-term data center supply contracts.I recommend a BUY rating, citing strong project economics, resilient demand outlook, and disciplined, contract-backed growth strategy.Suphanat Khumsap/iStock via Getty Images
EQT Corporation (EQT) is the largest natural gas producer in the United States. Its extraction operations are focused almost entirely on the Appalachian Basin, although 49% of its production is sold outside this region, primarily in the Gulf
32 Followers
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Bloom Energy ve 2. čtvrtletí meziročně zvýšila tržby z produktů zhruba o 215 % na 935 milionů USD a provozní ztrátu ve výši 3,5 milionu USD změnila na provozní zisk 182 milionů USD.
Up over 200% since last October, and over 1,400% over the last five years, Bloom Energy (BE +2.81%) has been on an absolute tear. And it's not hard to see why. Bloom has become one of the most important energy companies to the tech industry, mainly because it has something AI companies desperately need: power, and fast.
Bloom's solid oxide fuel cells -- Bloom boxes, as they're sometimes called -- can generate electricity directly at data centers, which allows developers to sidestep the years-long wait for a connection to the grid. This "time to power" advantage has catapulted Bloom from a relatively obscure clean-energy upstart into one of Wall Street's hottest energy stocks.
With such an enormous run behind it, however, the uncomfortable question emerges: Have Bloom's best market days come and gone, or is there still upside ahead?
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
80/100
Today's Change
(
2.81
%) $
7.68
Current Price
$
280.50
How Bloom cemented its dominance in 2026 As mentioned, Bloom sells solid oxide fuel cells for on-site power generation. The company earns most of its revenue from selling and installing these systems, with maintenance providing a smaller stream of revenue.
Sales of Bloom's energy systems have been spectacular, and its second-quarter numbers show just how quickly demand has spiked. Product revenue in Q2 hit $935 million, up roughly 215% year over year, and total revenue surpassed $1 billion for the first time in company history.
Better yet, Bloom's operating expenses did not rise as drastically as revenue. In Q2 2025, for example, Bloom generated about $401 million in revenue while spending roughly $111 million on operating expenses. This year, Bloom generated more than $1 billion while operating expenses rose to about $173 million. That helped Bloom swing from a $3.5 million operating loss a year ago to a $182 million profit last quarter.
One slight wrinkle is that about 73% of Bloom's second-quarter revenue came from a single buyer. That's concerning because it means a large portion of Bloom's recent growth depended on one buyer rather than a broad mix. That doesn't take away from what was an otherwise outstanding quarter, but it could make Bloom's growth less durable if that customer's orders slow down.
Image source: Bloom Energy.
Bloom has several projects in its back pocket, including partnerships with Equinix, Oracle, Nebius, and Brookfield Asset Management. But perhaps the most interesting is its relationship with miTAC Computing, which manufactures servers for AI workloads.
Bloom plans to deploy a "microgrid" at miTAC's manufacturing campus in Fremont, California. Bloom hasn't disclosed the project's size, but what fascinates me is the customer: miTAC isn't a data center. It basically makes equipment for data centers. This suggests that Bloom is trying to expand beyond data centers to encompass the broader AI-related supply chain, which could significantly broaden its market opportunity.
I don't think it's too late to buy Bloom Energy stock. At the same time, if you're buying Bloom with the expectation that immense growth will come from data centers, you might be late to that particular story.
However, it doesn't mean that Bloom's momentum has hardened into stasis. Indeed, if the miTAC relationship tells us anything, it's that Bloom is already looking for ways to expand beyond data centers. Bloom investors may not see the same 15-fold gain the stock has seen over the last five years. But I think the stock still has a competitive edge and the potential to beat the market over the long term.
UBS očekává, že kurz USD/MXN bude v září 2027 na úrovni 17,20, zatímco Crédit Agricole očekává 18,75; jejich výhledy pro mexické peso jsou tak protichůdné.
Mexican Peso Outlook UBS and Crédit Agricole Split Over 2027 Direction The Mexican Peso could strengthen or surrender ground against the US Dollar in 2027, with UBS and Crédit Agricole taking opposing currency views. UBS and Crédit Agricole expect the Mexican Peso to move in opposite directions over the coming year, setting markedly different forecasts for the same September 2027 horizon.
UBS projects USD/MXN at 17.20, against Crédit Agricole's 18.75.
The comparison captures a disagreement over the Peso's direction, with the exchange rate close to 18 in both banks' recent forecast documents.
Against that approximate reference, UBS's projection implies roughly 4.7% Peso appreciation, while Crédit Agricole's points to a decline of around 4%.
UBS retains its recovery view after a near-term setback UBS's optimism survives a recent reassessment of the Dollar's strength.
As Exchange Rates UK reported in our coverage of UBS's revised Peso outlook, the bank raised its nearer-term USD/MXN projection while retaining its September 2027 recovery target.
That earlier analysis argued that the Peso could continue to attract investors seeking interest income, even with a smaller advantage over US rates.
UBS said: "Despite the narrower US-Mexico rate differential, the global backdrop remains supportive for carry strategies given still benign financial conditions."
Investors funding Peso holdings in another currency must weigh the interest earned against both their financing costs and the risk of exchange-rate losses.
Mexico's central-bank overnight policy rate stands at 6.50%.
A weaker Peso can offset part or all of the additional interest income, particularly if US yields also rise and narrow Mexico's relative appeal.
UBS's earlier assessment identified a sharp US slowdown and disputes over the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement as risks to the currency.
Those risks expose a tension in the Peso's relationship with its northern neighbour: a strong US economy can support Mexican activity, while higher US interest rates can make Dollar assets harder to compete with.
Crédit Agricole expects a less favourable outcome Crédit Agricole's higher USD/MXN target fits a more selective approach to emerging-market currencies.
In earlier coverage of its Latin American currency outlook, the bank distinguished potential gains elsewhere in emerging markets from a weaker assessment of the Mexican and Colombian Pesos.
The bank said: "We do not expect a full-fledged appreciation of EM FX vs the USD."
Its latest forecast leaves the Mexican Peso weaker by September 2027 even though the bank expects the Dollar to lose ground against some other currencies over that period.
The banks also differ on Mexico's economic prospects.
UBS forecasts 2% growth in 2027, against Crédit Agricole's 1.2%, giving the Swiss bank a stronger domestic growth outlook alongside its more favourable currency projection.
USD/MXN exchange rate FAQ Will the Mexican Peso rise or fall vs the US Dollar in 2027?
The banks disagree. UBS expects appreciation by September 2027, while Crédit Agricole expects depreciation.
What are their USD/MXN targets?
For September 2027, UBS forecasts 17.20 and Crédit Agricole forecasts 18.75.
Does a lower USD/MXN mean a stronger Peso?
Yes. Each US Dollar would buy fewer Mexican Pesos.
Proti společnosti Duolingo (DUOL) byla podána hromadná žaloba kvůli údajným zkreslením informací o její strategii monetizace a růstu; týká se investorů, kteří nakoupili akcie mezi 2. květnem 2025 a 26. únorem 2026.
Did you buy DUOL Class A common stock between May 2, 2025 and February 26, 2026?
Affected DUOL Investor Summary
Who: Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL) What: Securities fraud class action lawsuit filed Class Period: May 2, 2025 through February 26, 2026 Deadline to Seek Lead Plaintiff Status: December 7, 2026 Key Lawsuit Allegations: Material misstatements and/or omissions concerning the company's monetization and growth strategies Investor Action: Contact Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com) for recovery options , /PRNewswire/ -- Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP (www.ktmc.com), a nationally recognized securities litigation law firm, informs investors that a securities fraud class action lawsuit has been filed against Duolingo, Inc. (Duolingo) (NASDAQ: DUOL) on behalf of those who purchased or acquired Duolingo Class A common stock between May 2, 2025 and February 26, 2026, inclusive. The lawsuit is filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and is captioned City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System v. Duolingo, Inc., No. 26-cv-02197 (W.D. Pa.). Investors have until December 7, 2026, to file for lead plaintiff status.
CONTACT KESSLER TOPAZ TO DISCUSS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS:
If you purchased or acquired Duolingo Class A common stock and have lost money on your investment, please provide your information here: https://www.ktmc.com/duol-duolingo-inc-class-action-lawsuit?utm_source=PR_Newswire&utm_medium=pressrelease&utm_campaign=duol&mktm=PR
You can also contact attorney Jonathan Naji, Esq. by calling (484) 270-1453 or by email at [email protected]. There is no cost or obligation to speak with an attorney.
DUOLINGO, INC. CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT - COMPLAINT ALLEGATION SUMMARY:
The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material facts about the company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose that: (1) daily active user ("DAU") growth rates were being leveraged against deliberately added user friction in the form of significant increases in ad volume, subscription tier upsells, and worsened product quality, and Duolingo understood that any amount of user friction would cause users to leave the app and, ultimately, negatively impact DAU growth rates; (2) Duolingo's rigorous A/B testing demonstrated to the company that increased friction in the free user experience, including its monetization push and rapidly generated low-quality AI content, was having negative impacts on DAU growth rates; (3) Duolingo's quickly generated AI content was worsening the quality of Duolingo's product offerings, negatively impacting the user experience and user trends, and threatening the sustainability of the company's financial performance; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about the company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Why did Duolingo's Stock Drop?
On November 5, 2025, Duolingo reported its third quarter financial results, revealing a decline in DAU growth to 36%, down from 49% in the first quarter. Duolingo also revealed that the company would reverse course on its monetization push and instead focus on user growth going forward. On this news, Duolingo's stock price fell 25%, to close at $193.74 on November 6, 2025.
Then, on January 12, 2026, Duolingo announced that its CFO had resigned. Duolingo also provided limited preliminary fourth quarter operating metrics, showing DAU growth of only 30%. On this news, Duolingo's stock price fell another 8.5%, to close at $161.74 on January 12, 2026.
Finally, after the market closed on February 26, 2026, Duolingo announced its fourth quarter financial results, confirming the slowed DAU growth and revealing that the "small financial impact" from its strategic shift was anything but. Specifically, Duolingo revealed that its 2026 DAU growth would come in at a meager 20% and be accompanied by lower bookings and less profitability. On this news, Duolingo's stock price fell 14%, to close at $101 on February 27, 2026.
WHAT DUOLINGO, INC. INVESTORS CAN DO NOW:
File to be lead plaintiff by December 7, 2026. Contact Kessler Topaz for a free case evaluation. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Retain counsel of choice or take no action. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS FOR DUOLINGO, INC. INVESTORS:
Duolingo investors have the opportunity to lead the lawsuit. Such investors may, no later than December 7, 2026, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or other counsel, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. A lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff is usually the investor or small group of investors who have the largest financial interest and who are also adequate and typical of the proposed class of investors. The lead plaintiff selects counsel to represent the lead plaintiff and the class and these attorneys, if approved by the court, are lead or class counsel. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP encourages Duolingo investors to contact the firm for more information.
ABOUT KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP:
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP is a leading U.S. plaintiff-side law firm focused on securities-fraud class actions and global investor protection. The firm represents individual investors as well as institutions, such as major pension funds, asset managers, and international investors. Kessler Topaz has led some of the largest recoveries in securities litigation and has been recognized by peers and the legal media with numerous accolades, including being recognized in Chambers & Partners USA 2026 as a Band 1 Top Firm in Securities and Class Actions, Legal 500's Tier 1 Rankings for Securities and M&A Litigation, The National Law Journal's Plaintiff's Hot List and Trailblazers in Plaintiffs' Law, BTI Consulting Group's Honor Roll of Most Feared Law Firms, The Legal Intelligencer's Class Action Firm of the Year, Lawdragon's Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers, and Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar. The firm operates globally with offices in Pennsylvania and California. Kessler Topaz has recovered over $25 billion for our clients and the classes they represent. The complaint in this matter was not filed by Kessler Topaz.
CONTACT:
Jonathan Naji, Esq.
(484) 270-1453
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
[email protected]
May be considered attorney advertising in certain jurisdictions. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.