Od konce května a začátku června bylo z hlavních burz staženo asi 240 milionů XRP. Největší pokles rezerv zaznamenal Binance, zatímco Upbit a Bithumb drží většinu sledované nabídky.
Binance has seen the sharpest percentage drop in XRP reserves, while Upbit and Bithumb continue to hold the bulk of tracked supply.
XRP’s struggle near $1 continues even as its peers display modest gains this week. The crypto asset went down almost 10% over the past month before it rebounded significantly on Wednesday evening.
Despite the weakness, much more XRP is being withdrawn than deposited across major platforms.
Reserves Slide According to the latest analysis shared by CryptoQuant, XRP reserves across Upbit, Binance, and Bithumb have fallen by roughly 240 million from their late-May and early-June levels, as of August 19. South Korean giant Upbit held 6.40 billion XRP, down from 6.51 billion on May 30, which is a decline of about 110 million, or 1.7%.
The figures for Bithumb fell to 1.82 billion from 1.85 billion on June 2, a decrease of roughly 30 million, or 1.6%. Meanwhile, Binance recorded the largest percentage decline, with its reserves for the token dropping to 2.62 billion from 2.72 billion over the same period, which translates to a reduction of approximately 100 million XRP, or 3.7%.
Combined reserves across the three exchanges decreased from about 11.08 billion to 10.84 billion, representing a decline of roughly 2.2%. Despite the overall reduction, Upbit remains the largest holder of the crypto asset among the three exchanges. In fact, Upbit and Bithumb together hold about 8.22 billion XRP and account for nearly 76% of the reserves tracked across the three platforms.
The falling exchange reserves come as wallet activity across major exchanges turns more focused on withdrawals. As recently reported by CryptoPotato, Coinbase recorded a seven-day net wallet count of -14,300 as of August 18. The exchange accounted for 47.3% of the total absolute imbalance, its highest share since July 2024.
Binance posted a net wallet count of -3,270, while Crypto.com recorded -2,680. Both exchanges moved into negative territory on July 18, almost a week after Coinbase. Binance’s share of the overall imbalance also rose from nearly zero on July 16 to around 10%. Upbit, however, saw its share fall to about 12% from 40% in June.
You may also like: Important Ripple News and XRP Price Update: August 19 XRP Wallet Activity Turns Withdrawal-Heavy Across Exchanges: What It Means for Price? Ripple’s (XRP) $1 Breakdown Could Get Worse Before It Gets Better Whale Activity The asset’s weak price performance has not stopped large transactions from picking up on the XRP Ledger. Data shared by crypto analyst Ali Martinez revealed that transactions worth more than $1 million jumped 280% in a single day and reached nearly 40, compared with around 10 during each of the previous two days.
The spike came shortly after wallets holding between 10 million and 100 million XRP accumulated about 72 million tokens in one day.
Network activity has also picked up, as the ledger recorded nearly 50,000 active addresses over a 24-hour period last week. Despite the rise in activity, social sentiment around XRP fell to a three-month low.
Volkswagen’s commercial vehicle arm, TRATON Group, has migrated its global treasury operations to Ripple Treasury’s platform, in a move that replaces decades-old manual processes with advanced digital infrastructure.
TRATON Group, part of the Volkswagen Group and the manufacturer behind international brands such as Scania, MAN, and Volkswagen Truck & Bus, has chosen Ripple Treasury to standardize forecasting across its worldwide operations.
Ripple Treasury confirmed TRATON as a new enterprise customer, sharing the news through its LinkedIn page. TRATON is recognized as one of the largest commercial vehicle manufacturers globally, servicing dozens of markets through its extensive portfolio of brands.
Commentators, such as crypto analyst BankXRP, drew attention to the scope of the deal, noting it as an example of Ripple embedding itself deeper within the financial infrastructure of multinational enterprises.
Ripple is replacing roughly 20 separate Excel forecasting templates within TRATON Group’s operations, moving the company toward a unified treasury solution.
Ripple Treasury is the newly branded treasury management solution born of Ripple’s $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury in 2025.
Mini dictionary: TRATON Group is a leading global manufacturer of commercial vehicles and a core subsidiary of Volkswagen Group, operating major brands like Scania, MAN, and Volkswagen Truck & Bus.
From fragmented spreadsheets to centralized dataTRATON’s treasury operations formerly depended on about 20 distinct Excel templates for planning and forecasting, each maintained separately by individual teams across its brands. This manual, fragmented approach often led to inconsistent data quality, heavy reconciliation workloads, and a reliance on localized expertise.
By transitioning to Ripple Treasury, TRATON’s teams now access a single, standardized forecasting environment. Automated data collection replaces manual entries while a centralized audit trail ensures accuracy and accountability. This upgrade is particularly significant for an organization with over €40 billion in revenue and multi-market operations spanning various currencies and subsidiaries.
Previous SystemRipple Treasury20 separate Excel templatesUnified digital platformManual data collectionAutomated data automationFragmented reportingCentralized audit trailInconsistent data qualityConsistent, reliable dataCommunity buzz and timingXRP community members noted that the TRATON partnership announcement fell on August 18, 2026, exactly five years after a social media post showed a Volkswagen stock chart. While some observers speculated about the timing, there is no verified connection, but the alignment has fueled discussion and buzz within the community.
Ripple’s expanding enterprise reachThis new agreement makes TRATON one of the first major industrial customers to deploy Ripple Treasury since Ripple acquired and rebranded GTreasury. The agreement highlights Ripple’s ongoing push into the enterprise sector, providing digital infrastructure for globally recognized manufacturers.
TRATON’s adoption of Ripple Treasury is a concrete example of a Fortune-level manufacturer replacing legacy systems with a blockchain-driven platform, signaling broader enterprise acceptance.
The arrangement is expected to streamline global treasury functions for TRATON, enhancing accuracy and efficiency while opening the door for Ripple to expand its presence in the automotive industry and among top-tier enterprises.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Kinetics Internet Portfolio s majetkem 275 milionů USD koupil přímý podíl v Ripple Labs. Podíl je odhadován na zhruba 150 000 USD a jde o akcie, nikoli o XRP.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
The American mutual fund Kinetics Internet Portfolio, which has $275 million in assets and is part of Kinetics Portfolios Trust, has acquired a direct equity stake in Ripple Labs Inc.
The investment was disclosed in the fund's quarterly Form NPORT-P report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to the document, the fund owns Class A common shares (Class A Common Shares) issued by Ripple.
SEC Form NPORT-P filing confirming Ripple Labs equity ownership by Kinetics Portfolios Trust. Source: SEC.govThe distinctive aspect of the transaction is that the institutional investor invested directly in the company — through Ripple shares — rather than in the
volatile XRP cryptocurrency.
You Might Also Like
HOT Stories
The position is estimated at approximately $150,000, making it small in size relative to a $275 million fund. The filing reflects the portfolio's holdings as of June 30, 2026, but due to regulatory reporting delays, the information became public only in August.
IPO and Washington factors: What is making funds rush to buy Ripple sharesThe fund's purchase coincided with a noticeable softening in Ripple management's rhetoric regarding a potential public listing. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium 2026, CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the company now takes a "more neutral" view of the idea of an IPO.
Previously, Ripple's senior management, including President Monica Long, had categorically denied having such plans, citing the company's strong balance sheet and the absence of a clear timeline.
Because Ripple Labs remains a private company, the fund acquired the securities through specialized over-the-counter pre-IPO platforms for accredited investors. The transaction comes amid Ripple's own large-scale $750 million tender offer to repurchase its shares, which valued the company at $50 billion.
You Might Also Like
At the same time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has opened a proposed new regulatory framework, known as "Regulation Crypto Assets," for public comment, while the U.S. administration is holding direct closed-door meetings with Ripple executives at the White House.
Against the backdrop of these regulatory changes and the confirmation of Ripple's multibillion-dollar valuation, institutional investors are rushing to gain exposure to the company through the private market rather than waiting for an official IPO.
Americké spotové Ethereum ETF zaznamenaly 19. srpna čistý příliv kapitálu asi 517,2 milionu USD, což je nejvíce za posledních devět měsíců. Nejvíce přitáhl BlackRock ETHA s 122,12 milionu USD.
US-based spot Ethereum ETFs experienced strong investor demand on August 19th. According to the latest data, a total net capital inflow of approximately $517.2 million was recorded in spot Ethereum ETFs. This marks the highest single-day net inflow into Ethereum ETFs in the last nine months.
BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, ETHA, stood out in terms of capital inflow. The fund recorded a net inflow of approximately $122.12 million. Fidelity’s FETH product came in second with an inflow of $36.54 million.
BlackRock’s staking-enabled ETHB fund received $9.71 million in capital injections, while Morgan Stanley’s MSSE product received $2.25 million. Franklin Templeton’s EZET fund recorded inflows of approximately $790,000, and Grayscale’s ETHE fund received $1.69 million in investment.
Grayscale’s Mini ETH ETF also contributed to the total daily inflows. The product saw a net capital inflow of approximately $16.04 million.
The strong capital inflow seen in Ethereum ETFs indicates a renewed institutional interest in the second-largest crypto asset. The recording of the highest daily net inflow in nine months, in particular, shows that spot ETF products have become a significant capital channel in the Ethereum market.
Demand for ETFs is closely monitored in terms of its impact on the direction of the Ethereum price. Institutional capital flowing in through spot ETFs can directly or indirectly support demand in the Ethereum market, while high inflows are seen as an indicator of increased investor confidence.
Market attention is now focused on whether ETF inflows will be sustainable in the coming days. Experts say that the continuity of total net inflows will be critical to assessing whether the strong inflows of the past few days are forming a lasting trend.
*This is not investment advice.
Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
Activest Wealth Management ve 2. čtvrtletí snížila podíl v Meta Platforms o 29,5 % a prodala 7 373 akcií. Po prodeji držela 17 588 akcií v hodnotě 9,907 milionu USD.
Activest Wealth Management lowered its stake in shares of Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META – Free Report) by 29.5% during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 17,588 shares of the social networking company’s stock after selling 7,373 shares during the quarter. Meta Platforms comprises approximately 1.9% of Activest Wealth Management’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 12th largest holding. Activest Wealth Management’s holdings in Meta Platforms were worth $9,907,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.
Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently modified their holdings of the stock. RHL Group LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Meta Platforms during the fourth quarter worth $28,000. Strategic Wealth Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in shares of Meta Platforms during the fourth quarter valued at $29,000. Niles Investment Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of Meta Platforms in the 4th quarter valued at $29,000. Axiom Investment Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of Meta Platforms in the 1st quarter valued at $36,000. Finally, Bayban raised its stake in shares of Meta Platforms by 100.0% in the first quarter. Bayban now owns 70 shares of the social networking company’s stock worth $40,000 after purchasing an additional 35 shares during the last quarter. 79.91% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Insiders Place Their Bets In related news, COO Javier Olivan sold 1,258 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Monday, August 10th. The stock was sold at an average price of $600.00, for a total transaction of $754,800.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief operating officer directly owned 1,517 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $910,200. The trade was a 45.33% decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available through this hyperlink. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, CFO Susan J. Li sold 2,127 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Saturday, August 15th. The stock was sold at an average price of $689.85, for a total value of $1,467,310.95. Following the transaction, the chief financial officer directly owned 15,347 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $10,587,127.95. The trade was a 12.17% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The SEC filing for this sale provides additional information. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Insiders have sold a total of 19,899 shares of company stock worth $12,290,969 in the last ninety days. 13.53% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.
Key Meta Platforms News Here are the key news stories impacting Meta Platforms this week: Positive Sentiment: Meta’s AI investments are showing measurable benefits: second-quarter revenue increased 28% year over year to $60.8 billion, while AI-driven ad ranking reportedly lifted clicks and conversions. Advantage+ reached a $75 billion annual revenue run rate, supporting the argument that AI can improve monetization and eventually offset heavy infrastructure spending. Meta’s AI Payoff Has Already Begun Positive Sentiment: Some analysts and institutional investors remain constructive, viewing the recent selloff as excessive and citing future margin expansion, WhatsApp monetization and additional AI businesses as potential upside drivers. Meta also remains a major holding among several large investment firms. Meta’s Dip Offers A 30% Upside Potential Neutral Sentiment: Options traders are reportedly using range-bound strategies, indicating that markets may expect elevated volatility but no immediate decisive move while the legal proceedings unfold. Meta’s legal troubles has options traders eyeing the jade lizard Neutral Sentiment: CFO Susan Li sold 2,127 shares to cover tax withholding tied to vested equity awards. Because the transaction was described as tax-related rather than discretionary, it is unlikely to materially change the investment thesis. Susan Li Sells Meta Shares Negative Sentiment: The central market overhang is the landmark federal child-safety trial involving 29 states. Prosecutors allege Facebook and Instagram were deliberately designed to encourage addictive use among children, while former safety personnel have testified that Meta ignored or minimized internal warnings. A loss could lead to substantial penalties, product changes, restrictions on youth engagement and follow-on litigation, potentially threatening user activity and advertising revenue. Former Meta engineer resumes testimony Negative Sentiment: Privacy criticism surrounding Meta’s smart glasses, including workplace restrictions and reports of people being recorded without consent, creates reputational and adoption risks for the company’s wearables strategy. Meta Glasses privacy concerns Meta Platforms Stock Performance NASDAQ:META opened at $546.03 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.32, a quick ratio of 2.23 and a current ratio of 2.23. Meta Platforms, Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $520.26 and a fifty-two week high of $790.80. The stock has a market capitalization of $1.39 trillion, a PE ratio of 20.57, a P/E/G ratio of 0.93 and a beta of 1.25. The company has a fifty day moving average of $594.30 and a two-hundred day moving average of $617.08.
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, July 29th. The social networking company reported $6.18 EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $7.19 by ($1.01). The firm had revenue of $60.80 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $60.22 billion. Meta Platforms had a return on equity of 33.18% and a net margin of 29.83%.The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 28.0% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm posted $7.14 earnings per share. As a group, research analysts forecast that Meta Platforms, Inc. will post 28.5 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Meta Platforms Announces Dividend The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, June 25th. Shareholders of record on Monday, June 15th were given a $0.525 dividend. This represents a $2.10 annualized dividend and a yield of 0.4%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Monday, June 15th. Meta Platforms’s payout ratio is currently 7.91%.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth META has been the subject of a number of recent research reports. Stifel Nicolaus reduced their price target on shares of Meta Platforms from $805.00 to $780.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Friday, May 1st. KeyCorp reduced their price objective on Meta Platforms from $790.00 to $780.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday, July 30th. Bank of America decreased their price objective on Meta Platforms from $835.00 to $810.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a report on Thursday, July 30th. TD Cowen dropped their price objective on shares of Meta Platforms from $800.00 to $750.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Thursday, July 30th. Finally, Rothschild & Co Redburn lifted their target price on shares of Meta Platforms from $900.00 to $1,000.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, July 21st. Four research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, thirty-five have issued a Buy rating and eight have issued a Hold rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $785.32.
Check Out Our Latest Analysis on Meta Platforms
Meta Platforms Profile (Free Report)
Meta Platforms, Inc (NASDAQ: META), formerly Facebook, Inc, is a global technology company best known for building social networking services and immersive computing platforms. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Menlo Park, California, the company operates a family of consumer-facing products and services that connect users, creators and businesses. In October 2021 the company rebranded as Meta to reflect an expanded strategic focus on augmented and virtual reality technologies alongside its social media businesses.
Meta’s core consumer products include Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, which enable social networking, messaging, content sharing and community building across mobile and desktop devices.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Meta Platforms Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Meta Platforms Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Meta Platforms and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Aurora Investment Managers ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšila podíl v Amazon.com o 23,4 % na 27 702 akcií v hodnotě 6 602 000 USD. Amazon tvoří asi 4,0 % portfolia fondu.
Aurora Investment Managers LLC. increased its holdings in Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN – Free Report) by 23.4% during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 27,702 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock after purchasing an additional 5,256 shares during the quarter. Amazon.com makes up approximately 4.0% of Aurora Investment Managers LLC.’s holdings, making the stock its 14th largest holding. Aurora Investment Managers LLC.’s holdings in Amazon.com were worth $6,602,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.
Other hedge funds also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Red Crane Wealth Management LLC boosted its holdings in Amazon.com by 2.3% in the first quarter. Red Crane Wealth Management LLC now owns 1,663 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock valued at $346,000 after acquiring an additional 38 shares in the last quarter. Robinson Smith Wealth Advisors LLC increased its stake in shares of Amazon.com by 0.7% during the first quarter. Robinson Smith Wealth Advisors LLC now owns 5,509 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock valued at $1,147,000 after purchasing an additional 40 shares in the last quarter. Sfam LLC raised its stake in Amazon.com by 3.4% during the first quarter. Sfam LLC now owns 1,224 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock valued at $255,000 after buying an additional 40 shares during the last quarter. Measured Risk Portfolios Inc. raised its position in shares of Amazon.com by 3.4% in the 1st quarter. Measured Risk Portfolios Inc. now owns 1,206 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $251,000 after purchasing an additional 40 shares during the last quarter. Finally, CoreFirst Bank & Trust grew its position in Amazon.com by 1.1% during the 1st quarter. CoreFirst Bank & Trust now owns 3,620 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock valued at $754,000 after purchasing an additional 40 shares during the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 72.20% of the company’s stock.
Amazon.com Stock Performance AMZN opened at $265.84 on Thursday. The company’s 50 day moving average is $249.09 and its 200 day moving average is $239.06. The company has a market cap of $2.87 trillion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 21.39, a PEG ratio of 1.73 and a beta of 1.45. Amazon.com, Inc. has a 12-month low of $196.00 and a 12-month high of $287.20. The company has a current ratio of 1.03, a quick ratio of 0.87 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.23.
Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, July 30th. The e-commerce giant reported $5.75 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.82 by $3.93. Amazon.com had a return on equity of 18.00% and a net margin of 17.44%.The firm had revenue of $200.61 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $197.03 billion. During the same period in the prior year, the business posted $1.68 EPS. Amazon.com’s revenue was up 19.6% on a year-over-year basis. On average, equities research analysts predict that Amazon.com, Inc. will post 8.05 EPS for the current year. Insider Buying and Selling In related news, CEO Douglas J. Herrington sold 3,741 shares of Amazon.com stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, August 17th. The stock was sold at an average price of $262.76, for a total transaction of $982,985.16. Following the sale, the chief executive officer owned 467,138 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $122,745,180.88. This trade represents a 0.79% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, SVP David Zapolsky sold 9,270 shares of Amazon.com stock in a transaction on Friday, May 22nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $268.53, for a total transaction of $2,489,273.10. Following the completion of the sale, the senior vice president owned 41,190 shares in the company, valued at approximately $11,060,750.70. This represents a 18.37% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Over the last quarter, insiders sold 16,011 shares of company stock valued at $4,256,608. Company insiders own 8.90% of the company’s stock.
Key Amazon.com News Here are the key news stories impacting Amazon.com this week:
Positive Sentiment: Prime Air expansion: Amazon plans to expand drone delivery to nearly 500 U.S. cities and towns by the end of 2026, roughly six times its current footprint. Deliveries could arrive in as little as 30 minutes for packages weighing up to five pounds. The move reinforces Amazon’s delivery advantage and supports efforts to compete with Walmart, FedEx and other logistics providers. Amazon to expand drone service to nearly 500 cities Positive Sentiment: AWS and AI momentum: AWS revenue reportedly grew 37% year over year to $42.2 billion in the latest quarter, its fastest growth in 18 quarters. Amazon also said its AWS AI business surpassed a $25 billion annualized revenue run rate, strengthening the case that AI workloads are accelerating cloud growth and could improve long-term earnings. Amazon’s AI business passed a $25 billion run rate Positive Sentiment: Infrastructure investment: Amazon increased its planned investment in a northwest Louisiana data-center campus from $12 billion to approximately $18 billion, signaling sustained demand for AWS capacity and allowing the company to secure power and water infrastructure in advance of regional grid constraints. Amazon Plugs $18B Into the Southern Power Grid Positive Sentiment: Analyst support: Wall Street’s average price target implies substantial potential upside, with analysts citing improving earnings estimates and AWS reacceleration. Wall Street analysts think Amazon could surge Neutral Sentiment: Alexa+ availability: Amazon made its AI-powered Alexa+ available at no additional cost to Fire TV users without requiring Prime membership. The broader user base could support future engagement and monetization, although the immediate financial impact is unclear. Amazon makes Alexa+ free on Fire TV Negative Sentiment: Capital-spending risks: The rapid data-center and AI buildout may pressure free cash flow, depreciation and returns. AWS also faces rising competition from other cloud providers and specialized AI infrastructure companies. Negative Sentiment: Insider transaction: CEO Douglas Herrington sold 3,741 shares worth approximately $983,000 under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 plan. The sale reduced his holdings by only 0.79%, making it a limited bearish signal. SEC insider transaction filing Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades AMZN has been the subject of a number of analyst reports. Mizuho set a $330.00 price objective on shares of Amazon.com and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research note on Friday, July 31st. Barclays reiterated an “overweight” rating and set a $365.00 price target (up from $330.00) on shares of Amazon.com in a report on Friday, July 31st. TD Cowen reissued a “buy” rating and set a $350.00 price target (up from $340.00) on shares of Amazon.com in a research report on Friday, July 31st. Oppenheimer reissued an “outperform” rating on shares of Amazon.com in a research report on Friday, July 31st. Finally, Morgan Stanley restated an “overweight” rating and issued a $335.00 price objective (up from $330.00) on shares of Amazon.com in a report on Friday, July 31st. One research analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, fifty-six have given a Buy rating and two have given a Hold rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Amazon.com currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $322.56.
Check Out Our Latest Report on AMZN
Amazon.com Company Profile (Free Report)
Amazon.com, Inc is a diversified technology and retail company best known for its e-commerce marketplace and broad portfolio of consumer and enterprise services. Founded by Jeff Bezos in 1994 and headquartered in Seattle, Washington, the company launched as an online bookseller and expanded into a global retail platform that sells products directly to consumers and provides a marketplace for third-party sellers. Over time Amazon has grown beyond retail into areas including cloud computing, digital media, devices and logistics.
Key businesses and offerings include Amazon’s online marketplace and fulfillment services, the Amazon Prime membership program (which bundles expedited shipping with streaming and other benefits), Amazon Web Services (AWS) which supplies on-demand cloud computing and storage to businesses and public-sector customers, and a range of content and advertising services such as Prime Video and Amazon Advertising.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Amazon.com Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Amazon.com Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Amazon.com and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Podíl Amazonu ve společnosti Anthropic by mohl mít při IPO oceněném na 2 biliony USD hodnotu zhruba 420 miliard USD. Jeho investice ve výši 13 miliard USD už výrazně zhodnotila.
One of the most impressive investments at the corporate level in recent years has been Amazon's (AMZN +2.46%) decision to take an early stake in Anthropic. The tech giant invested $8 billion in the artificial intelligence start-up in 2024, then followed that up with an additional $5 billion investment this year.
Combined, those moves gave Amazon a reported 21% stake in Anthropic, the developer of the Claude chatbot and family of large language models. And they have paid off in a big way. According to Amazon's quarterly financial reports, its Anthropic stake was valued at $190.4 billion as of the end of June, including $97.9 billion in convertible notes and $92.5 billion in nonvoting preferred stock.
But that calculation was based on a May 2026 funding round that valued Anthropic at $965 billion, and it's already being valued at much more than that. In early July, secondary markets were valuing Anthropic at $1.2 trillion in anticipation of the company going public as early as October.That would bring Amazon's stake to a whopping $252 billion.
And more recent estimates from secondary markets put Anthropic's valuation at much higher -- $2 trillion or more. If Anthropic is successful in that offering (it submitted its confidential S-1 form to the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year to explore the possibility), Amazon's stake in it would be valued at roughly $420 billion.
Amazon executive chairman Jeff Bezos. Image source: Amazon.
The bigger Anthropic gets, the better it is for Amazon Amazon could book a huge profit from its Anthropic shares, should it ever want to divest itself of some of them. But considering how fast Anthropic is growing, it may be hard for Executive Chairman Jeff Bezos and CEO Andy Jassy to pull the trigger on a sale.
Let's look at how the Anthropic stake has become an increasingly larger part of Amazon. By doing so, we'll look at four data points.
Metric
March 31, 2026
June 30, 2026
Estimated Valuation in July 2026
Estimated Valuation in August 2026
Anthropic's estimated value
$353 billion
$965 billion
$1.2 trillion*
$2 trillion*
Amazon's stake in Anthropic
$74.2 billion
$190.4 billion
$252 billion
$420 billion
Amazon's market cap
$2.158 trillion
$2.566 trillion
$2.814 trillion**
$2.814 trillion**
Anthropic stake as a percentage of Amazon's market cap
3.43%
7.42%
8.95%
14.92%
Data sources: Amazon filings, Macrotrends. *Targeted IPO valuation. **Amazon's market cap as of Aug. 17, 2026.
For this example, we'll look at the value of Amazon's stake in Anthropic as reported by the company in its two most recent quarterly filings and compare it to the company's market cap. At the end of March, Anthropic accounted for only 3.4% of Amazon's value, but that share climbed to 7.4% by the end of June as Anthropic's valuation rose.
If Anthropic achieved a $1.2 trillion valuation in its IPO -- a conservative estimate, given how secondary markets are pricing the start-up now -- its Anthropic shares would be nearly 9% of Amazon's value. But based on a $2 trillion valuation -- assuming that Amazon's market cap stays roughly at its current level for the next two months or so -- that Anthropic stake is providing nearly 15% of Amazon's value.
Today's Change
(
2.46
%) $
6.39
Current Price
$
265.84
With all this in mind, Amazon investors should be watching the Anthropic news closely. The bigger the AI startup gets, the more important it is to Amazon. Based on its current outlook, Bezos and Jassy could realize a windfall if they sell some or all of those shares -- money that could help fund Amazon's aggressive AI build-out. And if Anthropic's valuation craters, Amazon would be looking at big paper declines.
Either way, though, Amazon's $13 billion investment has been amazingly profitable -- and it may just be in the opening stages.
China's Alibaba (9988.HK), on Thursday reported a 9% rise in quarterly revenue, as strong demand for AI services fueled growth in its cloud business, while an extended "618" shopping festival boosted its core e-commerce unit.
As businesses increasingly deploy artificial intelligence applications, demand for the cloud computing power needed to train and run those systems has surged, benefiting China's largest technology companies.
Alibaba, the country's biggest cloud services provider, has stepped up investment in AI infrastructure, proprietary models and applications, positioning the technology as a key growth driver for its cloud and consumer businesses.
The company's AI cloud and compute services revenue rose 45% to 48.44 billion yuan in the quarter.
Alibaba's capital expenditures rose 75% to 67.68 billion yuan in the quarter ended June 30, as it continued to invest in AI infrastructure to meet strong customer demand.
The company reported revenue of 268.95 billion yuan ($40.02 billion) in the first quarter, compared with analysts' average estimate of 268.88 billion yuan, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Ascentis Wealth Management LLC lifted its holdings in shares of Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA – Free Report) by 27,363.2% in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 378,717 shares of the credit services provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 377,338 shares during the quarter. Ascentis Wealth Management LLC’s holdings in Mastercard were worth $194,509,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.
A number of other institutional investors have also added to or reduced their stakes in MA. Robinswood Financial LLC bought a new stake in shares of Mastercard in the first quarter worth about $25,000. E Fund Management Hong Kong Co. Ltd. increased its stake in shares of Mastercard by 820.0% during the fourth quarter. E Fund Management Hong Kong Co. Ltd. now owns 46 shares of the credit services provider’s stock valued at $26,000 after buying an additional 41 shares during the period. Strive Financial Group LLC bought a new position in shares of Mastercard during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $27,000. Hyposwiss Advisors SA bought a new position in shares of Mastercard during the fourth quarter valued at approximately $29,000. Finally, First Pacific Financial lifted its stake in Mastercard by 113.8% in the first quarter. First Pacific Financial now owns 62 shares of the credit services provider’s stock worth $31,000 after acquiring an additional 33 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 97.28% of the company’s stock.
Insiders Place Their Bets In other Mastercard news, insider Raj Seshadri sold 1,977 shares of Mastercard stock in a transaction on Thursday, July 2nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $529.73, for a total value of $1,047,276.21. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider directly owned 16,429 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $8,702,934.17. This trade represents a 10.74% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is available at this link. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, CEO Michael Miebach sold 15,372 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, August 5th. The shares were sold at an average price of $575.00, for a total value of $8,838,900.00. Following the sale, the chief executive officer owned 93,693 shares in the company, valued at approximately $53,873,475. This trade represents a 14.09% decrease in their ownership of the stock. Additional details regarding this sale are available in the official SEC disclosure. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Over the last 90 days, insiders have sold 62,913 shares of company stock worth $35,769,036. 0.09% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.
Mastercard Trading Down 0.0% Shares of NYSE:MA opened at $574.21 on Thursday. The stock’s 50-day simple moving average is $535.21 and its two-hundred day simple moving average is $517.37. The stock has a market capitalization of $503.01 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 31.58, a PEG ratio of 1.73 and a beta of 0.72. Mastercard Incorporated has a 52-week low of $464.52 and a 52-week high of $601.77. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.96, a quick ratio of 1.06 and a current ratio of 1.06. Mastercard (NYSE:MA – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, July 30th. The credit services provider reported $5.04 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $4.77 by $0.27. Mastercard had a net margin of 46.34% and a return on equity of 239.99%. The firm had revenue of $9.28 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $9.08 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm posted $4.15 EPS. The company’s revenue for the quarter was up 14.1% compared to the same quarter last year. Analysts expect that Mastercard Incorporated will post 19.86 EPS for the current year.
Mastercard Dividend Announcement The firm also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Friday, August 7th. Shareholders of record on Thursday, July 9th were paid a $0.87 dividend. This represents a $3.48 annualized dividend and a yield of 0.6%. The ex-dividend date was Thursday, July 9th. Mastercard’s dividend payout ratio is presently 19.14%.
Analyst Ratings Changes Several brokerages have recently issued reports on MA. Truist Financial increased their target price on Mastercard from $554.00 to $633.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, August 5th. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods increased their price target on shares of Mastercard from $665.00 to $685.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a research note on Friday, July 31st. Cantor Fitzgerald boosted their price objective on shares of Mastercard from $650.00 to $695.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research note on Monday, August 3rd. Barclays increased their price objective on shares of Mastercard from $640.00 to $660.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research report on Friday, July 31st. Finally, Clear Str upgraded shares of Mastercard to a “strong-buy” rating in a report on Thursday, July 16th. Five investment analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, twenty-five have assigned a Buy rating and one has issued a Sell rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the company presently has a consensus rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $661.93.
Get Our Latest Report on Mastercard
Mastercard Profile (Free Report)
Mastercard Incorporated is a global payments technology company that operates a network connecting consumers, financial institutions, merchants, governments and businesses in more than 200 countries and territories. The company facilitates electronic payments and transaction processing for credit, debit and prepaid card products carrying the Mastercard brand, while also providing a range of payment-related services to issuers, acquirers and merchants. Its technology and network enable authorization, clearing and settlement of payments and support a broad set of use cases including point-of-sale, e-commerce and mobile payments.
Beyond core transaction processing, Mastercard offers a suite of value-added services such as fraud and risk management, identity and authentication tools, tokenization and digital wallet support, cross-border and commercial payment solutions, and data analytics and consulting services for merchants and financial partners.
Featured Articles Five stocks we like better than Mastercard Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Mastercard Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Mastercard and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Benjamin Edwards Inc. ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšila svůj podíl v Johnson & Johnson o 21,8 % na 160 633 akcií po nákupu dalších 28 700 kusů. Hodnota podílu činila 40,799 milionu USD.
Benjamin Edwards Inc. boosted its holdings in shares of Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ – Free Report) by 21.8% in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The firm owned 160,633 shares of the company’s stock after buying an additional 28,700 shares during the period. Benjamin Edwards Inc.’s holdings in Johnson & Johnson were worth $40,799,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.
Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also added to or reduced their stakes in the business. World Investment Advisors increased its position in shares of Johnson & Johnson by 19.6% during the 4th quarter. World Investment Advisors now owns 161,343 shares of the company’s stock valued at $33,390,000 after purchasing an additional 26,450 shares during the last quarter. Benchmark Financial LLC bought a new stake in Johnson & Johnson in the 4th quarter worth approximately $554,000. Principal Financial Group Inc. lifted its position in Johnson & Johnson by 0.8% in the 4th quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. now owns 3,410,177 shares of the company’s stock worth $705,736,000 after buying an additional 28,370 shares during the last quarter. SageGuard Financial Group LLC purchased a new stake in Johnson & Johnson in the fourth quarter worth approximately $1,019,000. Finally, Signal Advisors Wealth LLC grew its position in Johnson & Johnson by 76.1% during the first quarter. Signal Advisors Wealth LLC now owns 15,126 shares of the company’s stock valued at $3,697,000 after acquiring an additional 6,539 shares during the last quarter. 69.55% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Insider Transactions at Johnson & Johnson In other Johnson & Johnson news, EVP Vanessa Broadhurst sold 23,054 shares of Johnson & Johnson stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, July 20th. The stock was sold at an average price of $251.27, for a total transaction of $5,792,778.58. Following the sale, the executive vice president directly owned 23,003 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $5,779,963.81. The trade was a 50.06% decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this link. Also, EVP Elizabeth Forminard sold 15,918 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, August 6th. The stock was sold at an average price of $257.00, for a total value of $4,090,926.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president directly owned 16,994 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $4,367,458. This represents a 48.37% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. In the last 90 days, insiders sold 63,972 shares of company stock valued at $16,245,605. Insiders own 0.16% of the company’s stock.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth Several analysts have weighed in on JNJ shares. Royal Bank Of Canada boosted their price target on shares of Johnson & Johnson from $265.00 to $287.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a research note on Monday, July 13th. Guggenheim lifted their price objective on Johnson & Johnson from $270.00 to $287.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, August 6th. Stifel Nicolaus set a $260.00 target price on Johnson & Johnson in a research note on Wednesday, July 15th. Freedom Capital upgraded Johnson & Johnson from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a report on Thursday, July 16th. Finally, Leerink Partners upgraded Johnson & Johnson from a “market perform” rating to an “outperform” rating and set a $265.00 price target on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, May 13th. One analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, eighteen have given a Buy rating and six have issued a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $268.22. Read Our Latest Report on Johnson & Johnson
Key Johnson & Johnson News Here are the key news stories impacting Johnson & Johnson this week:
Positive Sentiment: Strong earnings and higher guidance remain key catalysts. Second-quarter revenue rose 6.6% to $25.31 billion, exceeding estimates, while adjusted EPS of $2.90 topped the $2.84 consensus. Management also raised its 2026 outlook, reinforcing confidence in near-term earnings growth. Johnson & Johnson Stock Jumps as Healthcare Rotation Lifts Shares Positive Sentiment: FDA clearance expands JNJ’s medical-technology opportunity. The company received authorization for MONARCH QUEST 3, an AI-powered software upgrade adding 3D imaging, planning, and navigation capabilities to its robotic bronchoscopy platform. The development supports JNJ’s broader push into robotic surgery and advanced diagnostics. Johnson & Johnson Expands Robotic Bronchoscopy Push Positive Sentiment: Analysts continue to favor JNJ as a defensive growth and income stock. Several analysts maintain Buy or Strong Buy views, citing immunology and neuroscience medicines as potential growth engines that can help offset Stelara’s loss of exclusivity. JNJ’s 64-year record of dividend increases and recent quarterly payout of $1.34 also support its appeal to income-focused investors. Analysts Favor Dividend Aristocrats JNJ and LIN Neutral Sentiment: Above-average call-option activity points to increased short-term bullish positioning, but options flows may also increase volatility and are not a substitute for fundamental demand. Negative Sentiment: Executive Vice President Jennifer Taubert sold 15,000 shares for approximately $3.95 million, reducing her holdings by 7.16%. Continued insider selling by multiple executives could weigh modestly on sentiment, although the transaction does not by itself indicate weakening business conditions. SEC insider transaction filing Johnson & Johnson Stock Performance Shares of JNJ stock opened at $273.19 on Thursday. The stock has a fifty day moving average of $253.89 and a 200 day moving average of $242.23. Johnson & Johnson has a 52 week low of $173.33 and a 52 week high of $276.47. The firm has a market capitalization of $658.37 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 31.66, a PEG ratio of 2.59 and a beta of 0.24. The company has a quick ratio of 0.81, a current ratio of 1.09 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.44.
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, July 15th. The company reported $2.90 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.84 by $0.06. The business had revenue of $25.31 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $25.06 billion. Johnson & Johnson had a net margin of 21.48% and a return on equity of 32.42%. The company’s quarterly revenue was up 6.6% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the previous year, the firm earned $2.77 EPS. Johnson & Johnson has set its FY 2026 guidance at 11.600-11.750 EPS. As a group, research analysts expect that Johnson & Johnson will post 11.61 earnings per share for the current year.
Johnson & Johnson Dividend Announcement The business also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 8th. Shareholders of record on Tuesday, August 25th will be issued a $1.34 dividend. The ex-dividend date is Tuesday, August 25th. This represents a $5.36 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.0%. Johnson & Johnson’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 62.11%.
(Free Report)
Johnson & Johnson is a multinational healthcare company headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey, that develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of products across pharmaceuticals, medical devices and previously consumer health. Founded in 1886 by the Johnson family, the company has grown into a global healthcare organization with operations and sales in many countries around the world.
The company’s pharmaceuticals business, organized largely under its Janssen research and development organization, focuses on prescription medicines across therapeutic areas such as immunology, infectious disease, oncology and neuroscience.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Johnson & Johnson Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding JNJ? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Johnson & Johnson Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Johnson & Johnson and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Nově navržená pravidla Treasury k GENIUS Act by mohla americkým burzám zakázat nabízet zahraniční stablecoiny, což by mohlo vést k delistingu USDT na Coinbase. Omezení má začít platit 18. ledna 2027.
Reading Treasury’s newly proposed GENIUS Act rules on Bits + Bips, Austin Campbell said Coinbase’s US platform “might have to delist Tether,” pointing to Europe’s MiCA delistings as the template.
Original Image Credits: Official White House Photo by Abe McNatt
Posted August 18, 2026 at 4:26 pm EST.
Austin Campbell, founder of Zero Knowledge Group, said on the Bits + Bips podcast that Treasury’s newly proposed rules for the GENIUS Act could leave US exchanges unable to offer Tether‘s USDT, forcing platforms such as Coinbase to delist it for American users.
“There may be a de minimis, but I’m starting to think Coinbase’s US platform might have to delist Tether,” Campbell said on the Aug. 17 show, hours after the Treasury Department released the proposal. “And by the way, Europe has already been doing this.”
The rule is Treasury’s notice of proposed rulemaking for Section 3 of the GENIUS Act, which governs who may issue, offer and sell payment stablecoins in the United States.
Beginning Jan. 18, 2027, a digital asset service provider, the category that covers exchanges, generally may not offer or make available a foreign-issued stablecoin unless the issuer can and will comply with US lawful orders and any reciprocal arrangement between Treasury and the issuer’s home country.
“You cannot offer, sell, or make available a foreign-issued payment stablecoin in the US unless that issuer can and will comply with lawful orders and reciprocal arrangements,” Campbell said on the podcast, summarizing the core prohibition. “So basically, Tether can be used offshore, but not here.”
The European precedent Campbell’s read has a recent template. Under the EU’s MiCA regime, EU-regulated exchanges faced the same binary, carry a compliant stablecoin or lose their own license, and USDT lost its listings. Coinbase removed USDT for users in the European Economic Area effective March 31, 2025, with Crypto.com and Binance following the same quarter.
“I will remind people that’s not new, and we’re not going first,” Campbell said on the show. “The European Union with MiCA basically said, ‘If you’re not registered, goodbye.'”
USDT has about $183 billion in circulation, roughly 59% of the stablecoin market. It has not pursued the kind of registration MiCA required, and its answer to the US framework is more layered than a straight refusal.
Tether’s two-track answer The company has split its strategy. It kept USDT as an offshore, dollar-pegged token and launched a separate, US-domestic stablecoin, USAT, in January 2026, built to comply with the GENIUS Act, issued through Anchorage Digital Bank and run by Bo Hines, the former head of the White House’s crypto council.
Co-host Chris Perkins, head of Franklin Crypto, pointed to that split on the show. “They also have USAT onshore being led by Bo Hines,” Perkins said. “I don’t think that they’re just ignoring Genius. I think they have a plan.”
That plan is what makes Campbell’s scenario coherent rather than hypothetical. If USDT stays foreign and unregistered while USAT carries Tether’s compliant US business, USDT is exactly the sort of foreign-issued stablecoin the proposed rule is written to reach.
Caveats The rule is a proposal, not final. Treasury has opened a roughly 60-day comment window, and the foreign-issuer restriction does not take effect until Jan. 18, 2027.
A path also stays open: Treasury can deem a foreign issuer’s home regime “comparable” to the US framework and let it register, though no country has such a determination yet. And the proposal is silent on stablecoin yield, the issue tangled up in the separate CLARITY Act fight.
Related Listen: In an AI Agent World, Do Money Markets Win Over Stablecoins? – Bits + Bips
AI-assisted content: This article was produced with the assistance of AI tools and was reviewed, edited, and fact-checked by a member of the Unchained editorial team before publication.
GENIUS Act nutí emitenty stablecoinů držet rezervy v amerických státních pokladničních poukázkách, pojištěných bankovních vkladech nebo overnight repo operacích s Treasury, takže jejich růst přímo zvyšuje poptávku po dolaru. FASB zároveň navrhuje, aby stablecoiny mohly být v účetnictví firem vedeny jako peněžní ekvivalenty.
The GENIUS Act mandates Treasury bill reserves. FASB wants stablecoins counted as cash. The Treasury is writing enforcement rules for January 2027. Every provision points the same direction, and it is not toward protecting retail investors.
Summary
The GENIUS Act requires payment stablecoin issuers to hold reserves in U.S. Treasury bills, insured bank deposits, or Treasury repurchase agreements, turning every compliant stablecoin into a vehicle for dollar denominated sovereign debt distribution. Tether holds approximately $98 billion in U.S. Treasury bills as of its latest attestation, a position larger than the sovereign Treasury holdings of all but 18 countries, making a single stablecoin issuer one of the largest buyers of American government debt. FASB proposed three tests for stablecoins to qualify as cash equivalents on corporate balance sheets: redemption at par within one business day, reserves in low risk liquid assets, and independent attestation, codifying dollar stablecoins into the accounting system that underpins corporate finance. The U.S. Treasury published proposed rules on August 17 defining when payment stablecoins are issued, offered, or sold in the United States, with enforcement beginning January 2027, creating a compliance perimeter that favors dollar issuers with American banking relationships. The dollar’s share of global central bank reserves has declined from 72% in 2000 to roughly 57% in 2025, and stablecoins now circulate in countries where physical dollars and correspondent banking relationships have historically been difficult to maintain. The debate over stablecoin regulation in Washington has been framed, from the first hearing to the most recent markup, as a question of consumer protection. Are reserves adequate? Can holders redeem at par? Is the issuer solvent? These are the questions that legislators ask in public, the questions that lobbyists answer in testimony, and the questions that journalists use to structure their coverage.
They are also the wrong questions.
Consumer protection is a real concern. Tether operated for years without a credible audit. Terraform Labs marketed a stablecoin that collapsed to zero. Several smaller issuers have frozen redemptions during market stress. The history of the sector provides ample reason for regulation. But the legislation that Congress has actually written, the rules that regulators have actually proposed, and the accounting standards that the Financial Accounting Standards Board has actually drafted do not primarily address consumer harm. They address something else entirely.
Every major provision in the stablecoin regulatory stack points in the same direction: extending the reach of the U.S. dollar into financial infrastructure where it has historically been absent. The reserve requirements mandate Treasury bill purchases. The accounting rules fold stablecoins into the corporate cash system. The Treasury’s enforcement definitions create a compliance perimeter that structurally advantages dollar issuers. The pattern is consistent, and it has nothing to do with whether a retail investor in Lagos can redeem one USDT for one dollar.
The reserve requirement is a Treasury bill purchase mandate The GENIUS Act, which President Biden signed in June 2026, requires payment stablecoin issuers to back their tokens with a narrow set of eligible assets: U.S. Treasury bills with a remaining maturity of 93 days or less, insured deposits at FDIC member banks, or overnight Treasury repurchase agreements. The list is short, specific, and unmistakable in its effect.
When a stablecoin issuer mints a token, it must purchase one of these assets. When the stablecoin market grows, Treasury bill demand grows with it. The total stablecoin market capitalization crossed $178 billion in August 2026. If every dollar of that market were held in compliant reserves, stablecoin issuers would collectively hold more short term Treasury debt than the central banks of most G20 nations.
This is not an unintended consequence. The Treasury’s proposed rules for implementing the GENIUS Act, published on August 17, explicitly define the compliance perimeter around these reserve assets. The rules specify what counts as being “issued, offered, or sold in the United States,” creating a jurisdictional trigger that pulls any stablecoin with American users into the reserve mandate.
The effect is that stablecoin growth becomes synonymous with Treasury bill demand. Every new dollar of stablecoin issuance finances the U.S. government at the short end of the yield curve. In a period when the Treasury faces record refinancing needs and foreign central bank purchases of American debt have slowed, stablecoin issuers are becoming a structural buyer that did not exist a decade ago.
Tether is already a sovereign scale Treasury buyer The scale is not theoretical. Tether, which issues USDT with a market capitalization of approximately $119 billion, reported holding $98 billion in U.S. Treasury bills in its most recent quarterly attestation. That figure places Tether’s Treasury position above the sovereign holdings of Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and every other country outside the top 18 holders of American government debt.
This has happened without legislation. Tether moved into Treasury bills voluntarily, partly to improve the credibility of its reserves and partly because short term Treasuries offer a risk free yield that generates billions in annual revenue. The company reported $5.2 billion in net profit for the first half of 2025, almost entirely from Treasury bill interest.
JUST IN: Stablecoin issuers have two years to become compliant under GENIUS Act
July 2028 marks the deadline when non compliant stablecoins can no longer be offered to U.S. users pic.twitter.com/PsPyra0yXp
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) July 20, 2026 What the GENIUS Act does is make Tether’s voluntary choice mandatory for everyone else. Circle, which issues USDC, already holds reserves primarily in Treasury bills and money market funds. RLUSD, Ripple’s stablecoin, which recently crossed $1.71 billion in circulating supply, will need to comply with the same requirements. World Liberty Financial, the Trump affiliated entity that received an OCC bank charter for its USD1 stablecoin, is building its reserve structure around the mandate from inception.
The net result is a financial system in which private companies issue dollar tokens backed by government debt, distributed through crypto rails to users who may never open a U.S. bank account or interact with a correspondent bank. The dollar extends its reach without the Federal Reserve printing a single additional banknote.
FASB is folding stablecoins into the cash system On August 19, the Financial Accounting Standards Board proposed three tests for stablecoins to qualify as cash equivalents on corporate balance sheets. The tests require: redemption at par within one business day, reserves held in low risk liquid assets, and independent attestation of those reserves on at least a quarterly basis.
The proposal sounds like consumer protection. It reads like consumer protection. But its primary effect is to integrate dollar stablecoins into the accounting infrastructure that every public company, auditor, and financial institution in the United States relies on.
Under current accounting rules, companies that hold stablecoins must classify them as intangible assets, mark them down when their value drops, and cannot mark them back up when the value recovers. This treatment makes stablecoins impractical for corporate treasury management, regardless of how stable they actually are. The FASB proposal would eliminate this barrier for tokens that meet the three tests.
The implications run deeper than corporate convenience. If stablecoins qualify as cash equivalents, they become fungible with dollars in the accounting systems of every company that adopts the standard. A corporation holding $50 million in USDC could report it on the same line as $50 million in a JPMorgan Chase money market account. The distinction between a dollar in a bank and a dollar in a stablecoin would narrow to the point of irrelevance for financial reporting purposes.
This matters for dollar hegemony because it embeds stablecoins into the institutional plumbing that makes the dollar the default currency of global commerce. Corporate balance sheets are not abstractions. They determine which currencies companies hold, which currencies they pay suppliers in, and which currencies they receive revenue in. When stablecoins become cash equivalents, the dollar gains distribution channels that are cheaper, faster, and more accessible than traditional banking.
The compliance perimeter favors American issuers The Treasury’s proposed rules define when a stablecoin is considered to be issued or sold “in the United States.” The definitions matter because they determine which issuers fall under American regulatory authority and, by extension, which issuers can serve American users and access American financial infrastructure.
NEW: GENIUS Act stablecoin rules deadline missed by U.S. regulators
The legislation will still activate in January 2027 despite incomplete finalization pic.twitter.com/t3JdMON7xJ
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) July 19, 2026 The rules create a compliance perimeter that structurally favors issuers with existing U.S. banking relationships. A company like Circle, which is headquartered in Boston and holds reserves at Bank of New York Mellon, is already inside the perimeter. A company like Tether, which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and maintains banking relationships through non U.S. institutions, must restructure its operations to comply or risk being classified as a non compliant issuer whose tokens American financial institutions cannot hold.
This is dollar policy, not consumer policy. A non compliant stablecoin and a compliant stablecoin may offer identical consumer protections. Both may hold 1:1 reserves in Treasury bills. Both may offer instant redemption. But only the compliant issuer can be held on the balance sheets of American banks, treated as a cash equivalent by American corporations, and cleared through American payment rails. The compliance perimeter does not protect consumers from loss. It protects the dollar from competition.
The euro and yuan alternatives are being designed out of the race Circle’s euro stablecoin EURC crossed 400 million euros in circulation in August 2026. That figure represents less than 0.3% of USDC’s market capitalization. The disparity is not an accident of market preference. It is a structural outcome of how stablecoin regulation has been designed.
The GENIUS Act does not prohibit non dollar stablecoins. But it creates a reserve and compliance framework that is built around dollar denominated assets, American regulatory institutions, and U.S. banking infrastructure. An issuer of a euro stablecoin must comply with the same framework if its tokens are used by American residents, but its reserves must be held in euro denominated assets that do not generate the same regulatory advantages as Treasury bills.
China’s digital yuan and the European Central Bank’s digital euro represent the clearest alternative visions. Both are central bank digital currencies rather than privately issued stablecoins. Both are designed to reduce dependence on the dollar in cross border payments. But neither has achieved meaningful adoption outside domestic pilot programs.
The American approach is different. While the CLARITY Act’s odds have collapsed to 10% and broader crypto legislation stalls, stablecoin regulation has moved forward at speed. Rather than issuing a government CBDC, the United States has chosen to regulate private stablecoin issuers in a way that turns them into dollar distribution agents. The advantages are significant: private issuers innovate faster than central banks, they absorb the operational risk of running payment infrastructure, and they create demand for government debt through the reserve mandate. The disadvantage is that the government depends on private companies to maintain the integrity of the system, which is why the consumer protection language exists, even if it is not the primary purpose of the legislation.
Wyoming’s FRNT, a state issued stablecoin that recently migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink for its cross chain infrastructure, represents a hybrid model. It is government issued but uses private blockchain rails. The experiment is worth watching, but at its current scale it does not challenge the fundamental dynamic: stablecoin regulation is designed to extend dollar reach through private issuers, not to replace them with government alternatives.
The January 2027 enforcement deadline The GENIUS Act’s key enforcement provisions take effect in January 2027. After that date, non compliant stablecoin issuers face restrictions on access to the U.S. financial system. The Treasury’s proposed rules, now in a public comment period, will determine exactly how those restrictions are applied.
The deadline creates a compliance race. Issuers that want to serve American users, or whose tokens are held by American institutions, must restructure their reserves, obtain the necessary licenses, and submit to the attestation requirements before January. For Circle and other U.S. based issuers, compliance is largely a formalization of existing practices. For Tether, which has operated outside the U.S. regulatory perimeter for its entire existence, the deadline represents a strategic choice: comply and accept American oversight, or accept exclusion from the American financial system.
The consequences of exclusion are not symmetric. An issuer locked out of the U.S. system loses access to the largest capital market in the world. But the dollar does not lose anything. A non compliant USDT that cannot be held by American banks or treated as a cash equivalent by American corporations will be replaced by a compliant alternative. The demand for dollar stablecoins does not disappear when Tether is excluded. It migrates to Circle, to RLUSD, to USD1, or to whatever new issuer fills the gap.
This is the clearest signal of the legislation’s true purpose. A consumer protection framework would focus on ensuring that all stablecoin holders, regardless of which token they hold, can redeem at par. The GENIUS Act does that, but it also creates a two tier system in which compliant issuers gain access to American infrastructure and non compliant issuers do not. The tier that matters is the infrastructure tier, not the redemption tier.
The dollar’s distribution problem The dollar’s share of global central bank reserves fell from 72% in 2000 to roughly 57% in 2025, according to IMF data. The decline is gradual, not dramatic, and the dollar remains the dominant reserve currency by a wide margin. But the trend concerns policymakers because it reflects a structural shift: countries are diversifying into euros, yuan, gold, and other assets, and the correspondent banking system that distributes dollars globally has become more expensive and more restricted.
Stablecoins solve the distribution problem. A merchant in Lagos, a freelancer in Manila, or a small business in Sao Paulo can hold dollar stablecoins without a bank account, without a correspondent banking relationship, and without paying the fees that international wire transfers impose. The stablecoin is the dollar in a format that is cheaper to move, easier to access, and available 24 hours a day.
LATEST: 🇺🇸 Coinbase stablecoin revenue could surge 7x under Genius Act, but draft bill may restrict this growth by banning yield payments to holders, per Bloomberg. pic.twitter.com/KypHu86PSB
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) February 24, 2026 The regulatory framework ensures that this distribution channel remains tied to the American financial system. The reserve mandate ensures that every stablecoin is backed by Treasury debt. The FASB rules ensure that stablecoins are treated as dollars by the accounting system. The compliance perimeter ensures that the issuers who control the largest distribution networks operate under American oversight.
The consumer protection language is real, and the protections it provides are genuine. Holders of compliant stablecoins will have stronger redemption rights, clearer disclosure, and more reliable reserves than they do today. But the architecture of the system is designed to solve a problem that has nothing to do with consumer harm and everything to do with maintaining the dollar’s position as the world’s reserve currency in a decade when that position is under more pressure than at any point since Bretton Woods.
What to watch The Treasury’s comment period on GENIUS Act rules. Public comments close in October. The final rules will determine how strictly the compliance perimeter is enforced and whether non U.S. issuers receive a realistic path to compliance.
Tether’s compliance strategy. The company has not publicly committed to full GENIUS Act compliance. Any announcement of a U.S. entity, U.S. banking partner, or restructured reserve framework would signal that Tether views exclusion as an unacceptable business risk.
FASB’s final vote on the cash equivalents proposal. If adopted, the standard would take effect for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption would be permitted, and major technology companies with existing stablecoin exposure would likely adopt immediately.
Non dollar stablecoin issuance volume. If EURC, HKDAP, or other non dollar stablecoins grow faster than dollar stablecoins in the 12 months following the GENIUS Act’s enforcement date, it would suggest that the regulatory framework is pushing activity offshore rather than capturing it.
Central bank digital currency timelines. The ECB has targeted 2028 for a possible digital euro launch. Any acceleration or delay will affect whether dollar stablecoins face a serious competitor in the payments layer.
What is the GENIUS Act? The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act is a federal law signed in June 2026 that creates a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. It defines reserve requirements, licensing obligations, and consumer protections for stablecoin issuers operating in or serving users in the United States.
Why do stablecoin reserve requirements matter for the dollar? The GENIUS Act requires stablecoin reserves to be held in U.S. Treasury bills, insured bank deposits, or Treasury repurchase agreements. This means every dollar of stablecoin growth generates demand for dollar denominated government debt, turning stablecoin issuers into structural buyers of Treasury securities.
How much U.S. Treasury debt do stablecoin issuers hold? Tether alone holds approximately $98 billion in Treasury bills, a position larger than the sovereign Treasury holdings of most G20 nations. Combined with Circle’s reserves and other issuers, the stablecoin sector holds well over $130 billion in short term U.S. government debt.
What happens to Tether under the new rules? Tether must comply with the GENIUS Act’s requirements by January 2027 or face restrictions on access to the U.S. financial system. The company has not publicly committed to full compliance, and its incorporation in the British Virgin Islands complicates the path to meeting U.S. regulatory standards.
Can non dollar stablecoins compete under this framework? Technically yes, but the framework is structurally designed around dollar denominated assets and U.S. regulatory institutions. Non dollar stablecoins must comply with the same rules if they serve American users, but their reserves cannot generate the same regulatory and financial advantages as dollar backed tokens.
Is the United States building a central bank digital currency instead? No. The current U.S. approach relies on regulating private stablecoin issuers rather than issuing a government CBDC. This strategy allows private companies to handle operations and innovation while the government maintains oversight through reserve mandates and compliance requirements.
How does stablecoin regulation affect people outside the United States? Stablecoin regulation extends dollar access to users in countries where physical dollars and traditional banking are difficult to obtain. A merchant or freelancer in an emerging market can hold dollar stablecoins without a bank account, effectively joining the dollar system through crypto rails rather than correspondent banking. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions. Information is accurate as of August 19, 2026.
Addison Advisors LLC ve 2. čtvrtletí snížila podíl v Cisco Systems o 87,7 % a prodala 14 812 akcií. Po transakci držela 2 074 akcií v hodnotě 244 000 USD.
Addison Advisors LLC trimmed its position in shares of Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO – Free Report) by 87.7% during the second quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 2,074 shares of the network equipment provider’s stock after selling 14,812 shares during the quarter. Addison Advisors LLC’s holdings in Cisco Systems were worth $244,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.
Other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently made changes to their positions in the company. MidAtlantic Capital Management Inc. bought a new position in shares of Cisco Systems during the fourth quarter valued at $25,000. Intesa Sanpaolo Wealth Management acquired a new stake in shares of Cisco Systems in the fourth quarter valued at about $25,000. Networth Advisors LLC lifted its position in shares of Cisco Systems by 276.4% in the 1st quarter. Networth Advisors LLC now owns 335 shares of the network equipment provider’s stock worth $26,000 after purchasing an additional 246 shares during the period. Financial Life Planners bought a new position in Cisco Systems during the first quarter worth $27,000. Finally, Manning & Napier Advisors LLC boosted its position in shares of Cisco Systems by 137.0% during the 1st quarter. Manning & Napier Advisors LLC now owns 346 shares of the network equipment provider’s stock valued at $27,000 after purchasing an additional 200 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 73.33% of the company’s stock.
Key Headlines Impacting Cisco Systems Here are the key news stories impacting Cisco Systems this week:
Positive Sentiment: Cisco reported approximately $17.3 billion in quarterly revenue, up 18% year over year, and adjusted EPS of $1.22, exceeding the $1.17 consensus estimate. Management’s fiscal 2027 outlook was also optimistic, reinforcing expectations for continued growth. Strong AI Infrastructure Orders Drive Confidence in Cisco Systems Positive Sentiment: AI infrastructure demand remains a major growth driver. Cisco recorded $4 billion of AI infrastructure orders in the latest quarter, $9.3 billion for fiscal 2026, and expects $7.5 billion of AI infrastructure revenue in fiscal 2027. Bank of America reiterated its Buy rating and $150 price target, indicating substantial potential upside if execution continues. BofA makes bold call on Cisco stock after earnings Neutral Sentiment: Analysts questioned how sustainable the AI-led growth surge will be and whether Cisco can convert strong orders into durable, profitable recurring revenue. A recent Freedom Capital upgrade to Strong Buy provides a counterpoint to the more cautious views. What Kept Coming Up When Analysts Grilled CSCO Negative Sentiment: Gross-margin pressure was the key earnings concern. Margins fell to about 66.3% and are expected to remain around 65%–66% in the next quarter, partly because of higher memory costs, hardware pricing, and an unfavorable product mix. Soft recurring growth and a premium valuation have led some analysts to recommend holding the stock despite strong revenue growth. Cisco: Buy The AI Pullback, But Watch The Margin Pressure Negative Sentiment: HSBC downgraded Cisco to Hold, while CEO Charles Robbins and other executives disclosed share sales. The transactions were conducted under pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 plans, making them a modest negative signal rather than clear evidence of deteriorating management confidence. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In CSCO has been the subject of a number of research analyst reports. Wall Street Zen upgraded Cisco Systems from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Saturday, August 15th. Argus upped their price objective on shares of Cisco Systems from $100.00 to $150.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, May 19th. Evercore boosted their price target on shares of Cisco Systems from $110.00 to $150.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research note on Thursday, May 14th. Freedom Capital raised shares of Cisco Systems from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note on Sunday. Finally, Zacks Research lowered Cisco Systems from a “strong-buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, August 4th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, fifteen have issued a Buy rating and seven have issued a Hold rating to the company. According to MarketBeat, the stock presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $129.43. Read Our Latest Report on CSCO
Cisco Systems Stock Performance Shares of CSCO opened at $110.55 on Thursday. The stock has a 50 day moving average of $116.47 and a 200 day moving average of $99.94. The company has a market capitalization of $435.73 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 33.10, a PEG ratio of 2.38 and a beta of 1.02. Cisco Systems, Inc. has a 12 month low of $66.13 and a 12 month high of $130.37. The company has a current ratio of 0.93, a quick ratio of 0.79 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.39.
Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, August 12th. The network equipment provider reported $1.22 earnings per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.17 by $0.05. Cisco Systems had a return on equity of 30.16% and a net margin of 20.95%.The business had revenue of $17.25 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $16.84 billion. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm earned $0.99 earnings per share. The business’s revenue was up 17.6% on a year-over-year basis. Cisco Systems has set its FY 2027 guidance at 5.050-5.110 EPS and its Q1 2027 guidance at 1.320-1.340 EPS. As a group, sell-side analysts forecast that Cisco Systems, Inc. will post 4.09 earnings per share for the current year.
Cisco Systems Dividend Announcement The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Wednesday, October 21st. Shareholders of record on Friday, October 2nd will be given a $0.42 dividend. This represents a $1.68 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 1.5%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, October 2nd. Cisco Systems’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is currently 50.30%.
Insider Transactions at Cisco Systems In other news, EVP Oliver Tuszik sold 2,760 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Friday, August 14th. The stock was sold at an average price of $112.46, for a total transaction of $310,389.60. Following the transaction, the executive vice president owned 165,276 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $18,586,938.96. This represents a 1.64% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at the SEC website. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, EVP Thimaya K. Subaiya sold 7,127 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, June 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $119.91, for a total value of $854,598.57. Following the completion of the sale, the executive vice president owned 140,857 shares in the company, valued at $16,890,162.87. This represents a 4.82% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Over the last 90 days, insiders sold 69,179 shares of company stock valued at $7,985,229. 0.01% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.
Cisco Systems Profile (Free Report)
Cisco Systems, Inc is a global technology company that designs, manufactures and sells networking hardware, software and telecommunications equipment. Its core business focuses on enabling enterprise and service-provider networks through products such as routers, switches, network security appliances and wireless systems. Over time Cisco has broadened its portfolio to emphasize software-defined networking, cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure and edge computing solutions that help organizations build and manage modern IT environments.
In addition to hardware, Cisco offers a growing range of software platforms and subscription services for network management, security, analytics and collaboration.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Cisco Systems Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding CSCO? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Cisco Systems Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Cisco Systems and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Myriad Uranium oznámila předběžné gama-probe ekvivalentní výsledky z vrtů v Lucky Cliff, kde všechny čtyři vrty zasáhly četné široké intervaly blízkopovrchové uranové mineralizace. Nejdelší mineralizovaný interval měl 19,96 m a nejvyšší zjištěná hodnota byla 1 336 ppm eU₃O₈.
Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 20, 2026) - Myriad Uranium Corp. (CSE: M) (OTCQB: MYRUF) (FSE: C3Q) ("Myriad" or the "Company") is pleased to announce preliminary gamma probe equivalent uranium results from drilling at Lucky Cliff, Copper Mountain (see Figure 1). These estimates are not chemical assays and remain subject to laboratory verification.
Highlights
Myriad's current Phase II drill program is designed to achieve two primary objectives:
Verify mineralization that underpins a historical resource estimate1 of 26.63 Mlbs eU₃O₈ and generate modern data to support a future maiden mineral resource estimate.
Evaluate exploration upside by testing historical targets identified through drilling in the 1970s and assessing new targets generated by Myriad's own exploration work, that could deliver an exploration target2 of between 245 and 655 Mlbs eU₃O₈.
Myriad has now completed four drill holes at Lucky Cliff for a total of 716.6 metres (2,351 feet) of drilling.
All four holes intersected numerous broad intervals of near-surface uranium mineralization.
Across the four holes, 50 mineralized intervals exceed 100 ppm eU₃O₈.
The longest mineralized interval is 19.96 metres (65.49 feet) at 269 ppm eU₃O₈ from 18 m.
The highest grade intercepted is 1,336 ppm eU₃O₈.
Because Lucky Cliff lies outside any area with a historical resource or endowment estimate, any mineral resource that may in future be defined there would be new and incremental to the Copper Mountain Uranium Project mineral endowment, if supported by sufficient exploration and estimation work.
Best Intervals Above 100 ppm eU₃O₈ Threshold
Hole IDFrom (m)To (m)Length (m)eU₃O₈ (ppm)eU₃O₈ (%)GT (m%)¹Peak (ppm)LUC0001DD118.46130.8012.341580.0160.19314LUC0002DD29.6134.494.881390.0140.07255LUC0002DD36.6241.194.572000.0200.09399LUC0002DD45.1651.566.404080.0410.261,034including46.6846.980.306650.0670.02-including47.5948.661.078210.0820.09-including48.9749.270.305990.0600.02-LUC0002DD85.08100.6315.541790.0180.28281LUC0003DD18.9421.692.743890.0390.111,109LUC0003DD28.5431.142.592530.0250.07437LUC0003DD33.2740.747.471860.0190.14361LUC0004DD18.0037.9619.962690.0270.541,336including26.9928.971.988660.0870.17-including34.9135.670.766480.0650.05-LUC0004DD58.2361.893.662590.0260.09522¹ GT (m%) = grade-thickness product (interval length in metres multiplied by grade in %), a standard metric for comparing the relative scale of mineralized intercepts.Equivalent uranium (eU₃O₈) grades are radiometric estimates derived from downhole gamma logging and are not chemical assays. They are preliminary, may be affected by disequilibrium, borehole diameter, casing, water, probe calibration and other borehole conditions, and will be verified by laboratory assay results. Verification will include standard QAQC protocols such as the insertion of blanks, standards (Certified Reference Materials) and duplicates as well as the implementation of chain of custody procedures.The intervals above are selected preliminary radiometric intervals reported above a 100 ppm eU3O8 threshold and are intended to highlight the most material intercepts by length, grade and grade-thickness. They should be read together with Appendix 1, which provides the full interval summaries at the stated reporting thresholds.Reported intervals are downhole lengths and do not represent true widths, which have not yet been determined. Myriad's CEO, Thomas Lamb, commented: "These are encouraging preliminary radiometric results from a new area in the north of our recently expanded Copper Mountain Project Area and outside historical estimate boundaries. Mineralization occurs at shallow depths with some remarkably long intervals. All four boreholes encountered significant equivalent uranium mineralization. While the grades are typically not as high as we saw at Canning during Phase I, they are generally well above average historical grades for the Copper Mountain Project, and the intervals are much longer and shallower than we saw at Canning. We currently see 50 intervals above 100 ppm eU3O8, several of them quite long (the longest being 19.96 m (65.49 ft) at 269 ppm from 18 m) with a peak grade of 1,336 ppm eU3O8. These estimates remain subject to confirmation by chemical assay and may increase or decrease once disequilibrium, borehole conditions, and laboratory results are assessed. During our Phase I drilling at Canning reported here, chemical assays reported were higher than downhole gamma probe grades by an average of 50% above 500 ppm and 60% above 1,000 ppm. However, the relationship between radiometric equivalent grades and assay grades at Lucky Cliff has not yet been established, and no similar adjustment should be assumed for Lucky Cliff until assay results are received and assessed. Regardless, we consider these to be excellent preliminary results. Because Lucky Cliff sits outside the northern boundary of the Bendix Assessment Area (see Figure 1 and the assessment reported here), and entirely outside any area with a historical uranium resource or endowment estimate, any resource ultimately estimated there will be entirely new and incremental to the Copper Mountain Uranium Project, if supported by sufficient exploration and estimation work."
Lucky Cliff
The Lucky Cliff target area is located about 2,000 metres (6,500 feet) north of the Canning deposit, along the Myrtle's Fault trend. Lucky Cliff was explored by Union Pacific in the late 1970s, but the data was insufficient for the estimation of mineral resources and does not form part of the historical 26.63 Mlb eU3O8 estimate reported by Union Pacific at the time (see note on Historical Estimates below). It also falls outside of the Bendix Assessment Area, which was estimated to contain an Exploration Target of between 245 and 655 Mlbs contained within 1,111 Mt to 2,971 Mt (at 100 ppm eU3O8) and 222 Mt to 594 Mt (at 500 ppm eU3O8), as described here and in the NI 43-101 Technical report. The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target are conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the Exploration Target being delineated as a mineral resource.
The target area was selected by Union Pacific as a drill target on the basis of favourable geological and geochemical criteria. Several strong N45°E structural trends are present, and the associated rock types are similar to those found at other mineralized occurrences in the project area. A close-spaced (500-foot center) stream sediment sampling program undertaken by Union Pacific identified several highly anomalous (to 118 ppm) zones, and follow-up work was designed to test these anomalies. Ground-truthing of radiometric anomalies by Myriad following the helicopter survey completed late last year identified one point above the target area with a surface measurement of 193.2 ppm eU, using a calibrated RS-230 Handheld Gamma-Ray Spectrometer. Handheld spectrometer readings are preliminary and indicative only, may be affected by environmental and geometric factors, are not assay results, do not measure eU3O8 directly, and may not be representative of uranium concentrations in rock samples.
At least twenty holes were drilled by Union Pacific in the late 1970s, and at least 10 holes were reported to have intersected mineralization in excess of 100 ppm eU3O8 from depths as shallow as 6 m (20 ft). LK-9 was reported to have intersected 355 ft of 0.027% eU3O8 starting at 59 ft, including 207 ft of 0.032% eU3O8. LK-11 was reported to have intersected 31 ft of 0.020% at 21.5 ft and 59.5 ft of 0.025% at 83.5 ft. Other reported intersections in this target area included 15.5 ft of 0.055% eU3O8 at 55 ft in hole LK-10. Higher grades were reported to be associated with a mafic dyke intruding the main fault zone through the target area. Reported widths are historical downhole widths and true widths are unknown. Equivalent ("e") uranium grades were determined by AEC gamma probes using appropriate calibration factors. No original assay certificates, complete QAQC records, probe calibration records or full original datasets have been reviewed by the Company or the Qualified Person for these historical drill results, and the results should not be relied upon as current exploration results. There is no historical mineral resource estimate for Lucky Cliff.
Myriad selected borehole positions to coincide with similar historical Union Pacific hole positions (the exact historical hole positions are not marked on surface). Thus, LUC0001DD coincides with LK-10; LUC0002DD coincides with LK-9; LUC0003DD coincides with LK-11; and LUC0004DD coincides with LHC-42 (Table 1 and Figure 1). Mineralized intervals for these holes are documented in historical reports, as mentioned above, but original data is not available for verification. Furthermore, only the most significant intervals were mentioned in the historical reports, and no comprehensive summary of intervals is available. Therefore, direct comparison of new and historical grade intervals is not possible.
To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit:
https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/6301/310576_2e8b7d4294216ac4_002full.jpg
Downhole Logging
Downhole logging was undertaken by Century Geophysical (Century), a respected downhole probe manufacturer and logging company based in Tulsa, Oklahoma and in business since 1946. Century deployed their "Uranium E-Log Suite", which includes Natural Gamma Ray, Resistivity, Spontaneous Potential (S.P.) and Deviation probes. Borehole deviations were additionally measured using a Gyro Deviation tool, which is unaffected by magnetic influence. Century delivered data in electronic format for each hole including log plots and calculated equivalent uranium grades.
Equivalent Uranium Grade Calculations
Century uses its OREGRADE system to convert raw gamma-ray logs into uranium grade estimates expressed as eU3O8. The process relies on a trial-and-error iterative deconvolution algorithm to model the distribution of radioactivity from gamma-ray log data. Raw gamma counts are normalized and corrected for borehole conditions by applying dead time correction, geometric multipliers for area-based K-factors and linear depth, and environmental corrections such as water factor below the water table and casing factor within cased sections. The system uses synthetic log creation and iterative interval calculations to estimate eU3O8 grades over 15 cm (0.5 foot) intervals. The final output is a grade curve and a printed report that identifies distinct zones and calculates cut-off analyses and best intervals based on grade-thickness product. These estimates remain subject to the limitations of gamma logging and confirmation by laboratory assays.
Historical Resource Estimates
The historical estimate of 26.63 Mlbs eU₃O₈ in 44.1 Mt at 171 ppm eU₃O₈, using a 100 ppm cut-off, was compiled from internal Rocky Mountain Energy Company reports, which are summarised in a report titled "Copper Mountain Exploration Project Report" by Southard, G.G., et. al. (1979). A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Myriad is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
The historical estimates were completed using polygonal methods based on modelled mineralization geometries. The historical estimates used U.S. Bureau of Mines categories at the time, including terms described as "Inferred" and "Indicated," which are not current CIM terminology and should not be interpreted as current mineral resource categories. Details of the historical resource estimates are available in the current NI 43-101 Technical Report. While the QP has determined that the historical estimates described in this news release are relevant to the Copper Mountain Project Area, are reasonably reliable given the authors and circumstances of their preparation, and are suitable for public disclosure, the estimates are decades old and based on drilling data for which the logs are, as of yet, predominantly unavailable. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these historical estimates as an indicator of current mineral resources or mineral reserves at the Project Area. Also, while the Copper Mountain Project Area contains all or most of each deposit referred to, some of the resources referred to may be located outside the current Copper Mountain Project Area.
Inherent limitations of the historical estimates include that the nature of mineralization (fracture hosted) makes estimation from drill data less reliable than other deposit types (e.g. those that are thick and uniform). From Myriad Uranium's viewpoint, limitations include that the Company has not been able to verify the original data itself and that the estimates may be optimistic relative to subsequent work which applied a "delayed fission neutron" (DFN) factor to calculate grades. On the other hand, DFN is controversial, in that the approach is viewed by some experts as too conservative. Nevertheless, it was applied in later resource estimations by Union Pacific relating to Copper Mountain. To verify the historical estimates and re-state them as current resources, a program of re-drilling is required to generate new data that can be used to establish the correlation and continuity of geology and grades between boreholes with sufficient confidence to estimate mineral resources.
Qualified Person
The scientific and technical information in this news release, including the eU3O8 methodology and historical disclosure, has been reviewed and approved by George van der Walt, MSc., Pr.Sci.Nat., FGSSA, a "Qualified Person" as defined under NI 43-101. Mr. van der Walt is a Principal Consultant with The MSA Group (Pty) Ltd, an independent consultancy, and is independent of the Company for the purposes of NI 43-101. A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to verify historical exploration results or to classify the historical estimates referred to in this news release as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Myriad is not treating such historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.
About Myriad Uranium Corp.
Myriad Uranium Corp. holds a 75% interest in the Copper Mountain Uranium Project in Wyoming, USA, with a definitive agreement in place to acquire the remaining 25% via the acquisition of Rush Rare Metals Corp. Copper Mountain hosts multiple historical uranium deposits and past-producing mines, including the Arrowhead Mine (approximately 500,000 lbs U₃O₈ produced). Union Pacific conducted extensive exploration and development in the district during the late 1970s, including approximately 2,000 boreholes and advanced mine planning, before the uranium market downturn in 1980. Union Pacific is estimated to have invested approximately C$125 million (2026 dollars) in the project, generating significant historical resource estimates.
A news release detailing a comprehensive assessment of Copper Mountain's uranium endowment by Bendix Engineering for the US Department of Energy published in 1982 can be viewed here.
Myriad holds a 10% free carried interest in the Red Basin Uranium Project, recently sold to 8VC- and Overmatch-backed Subatomic Industries. Red Basin carries significant historical resource estimates from extensive drilling by Occidental Oil in the late 1970s, and also hosts vanadium, which has been designated a strategic and critical mineral by the U.S. government. Note the caution on historical estimates below.
Myriad's 100%-owned Breccia Pipe Project in Arizona comprises at least 23 breccia pipes that are prospective for uranium and REEs. One of the pipes, the Wate Pipe, was previously owned and explored by Energy Fuels and is the subject of a historical resource estimate. The Breccia Pipe Project has been optioned to Wedgemount Resources (release here).
Note: A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the Copper Mountain, Red Basin, and Breccia Pipe Project historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Myriad is not treating those historical estimates as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. Myriad intends to conduct further work to determine whether the historical estimates can be verified and, if appropriate, supported by current mineral resource estimates.
Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains "forward-looking information" that is based on the Company's current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections. This forward-looking information includes, among other things, the Company's business, plans, outlook and business strategy. The words "may", "would", "could", "should", "will", "likely", "expect," "anticipate," "intend", "estimate", "plan", "forecast", "project" and "believe" or other similar words and phrases are intended to identify forward-looking information. The reader is cautioned that assumptions used in the preparation of any forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect, including with respect to the Company's business plans respecting the exploration and development of the Company's mineral properties, the proposed work program on the Company's mineral properties and the potential and economic viability of the Company's mineral properties. Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: inability to verify historical data, no assurance of defining mineral resources, permitting, drilling delays and changes in economic conditions or financial markets; increases in costs; litigation; legislative, environmental and other judicial, regulatory, political and competitive developments; and technological or operational difficulties. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking information. These and other factors should be considered carefully, and readers should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking information. The Company does not intend, and expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. The CSE has not reviewed, approved or disapproved the contents of this news release.
APPENDIX 1: Preliminary eU3O8 Grade Interval Summaries at 100, 200 and 500 ppm thresholds
Reported intervals are downhole lengths; true widths have not yet been determined.
100 ppm (minimum interval 0.91 metre / 3 feet)Hole IDFrom (m)To (m)Length (m)eU3O8 (ppm)eU3O8 (%)GT (m%)LUC0001DD18.4920.311.831760.0180.03LUC0001DD21.0821.990.911550.0150.01LUC0001DD25.0425.950.911900.0190.02LUC0001DD36.0136.930.911070.0110.01LUC0001DD38.3039.971.681600.0160.03LUC0001DD45.4648.362.901530.0150.04LUC0001DD53.2354.761.521520.0150.02LUC0001DD57.8158.570.761530.0150.01LUC0001DD59.6361.621.981360.0140.03LUC0001DD67.5670.302.741470.0150.04LUC0001DD77.4678.991.521370.0140.02LUC0001DD103.37104.290.911460.0150.01LUC0001DD105.20107.792.591120.0110.03LUC0001DD118.46130.8012.341580.0160.19LUC0002DD21.6923.521.831750.0180.03LUC0002DD29.6134.494.881390.0140.07LUC0002DD36.6241.194.572000.0200.09LUC0002DD43.3343.940.611520.0150.01LUC0002DD45.1651.566.404080.0410.26LUC0002DD66.8068.171.371200.0120.02LUC0002DD72.1375.183.051380.0140.04LUC0002DD79.4580.821.371550.0150.02LUC0002DD83.4184.631.221580.0160.02LUC0002DD85.08100.6315.541790.0180.28LUC0002DD101.09103.982.901540.0150.04LUC0002DD105.35107.341.981460.0150.03LUC0002DD113.89114.650.761180.0120.01LUC0002DD129.59132.182.591200.0120.03LUC0002DD138.58140.411.831820.0180.03LUC0003DD11.7812.540.761210.0120.01LUC0003DD18.9421.692.743890.0390.11LUC0003DD25.5026.110.611350.0140.01LUC0003DD28.5431.142.592530.0250.07LUC0003DD33.2740.747.471860.0190.14LUC0003DD48.3649.581.221050.0100.01LUC0003DD57.0457.960.911240.0120.01LUC0003DD58.5759.941.371200.0120.02LUC0003DD68.6371.372.741220.0120.03LUC0003DD76.8677.620.761120.0110.01LUC0004DD18.0037.9619.962690.0270.54LUC0004DD55.0356.251.221910.0190.02LUC0004DD58.2361.893.662590.0260.09LUC0004DD62.6564.942.291860.0190.04LUC0004DD66.6168.291.681220.0120.02LUC0004DD85.3686.270.911170.0120.01LUC0004DD88.1088.860.761630.0160.01LUC0004DD89.3291.151.831380.0140.03LUC0004DD189.75190.670.911140.0110.01LUC0004DD206.67207.430.761240.0120.01LUC0004DD249.34250.100.761370.0140.01200 ppm Cut-off (minimum interval 0.3 metre / 1 foot)Hole IDFrom (m)To (m)Length (m)eU3O8 (ppm)eU3O8 (%)GT (m%)LUC0001DD18.6419.400.762520.0250.02LUC0001DD125.62126.691.072220.0220.02LUC0001DD127.76129.591.832500.0250.05LUC0002DD22.6023.210.612280.0230.01LUC0002DD33.8834.340.462450.0250.01LUC0002DD37.2337.690.462010.0200.01LUC0002DD38.6039.520.912970.0300.03LUC0002DD40.1340.580.463110.0310.01LUC0002DD46.5351.254.725010.0500.24LUC0002DD85.6986.911.222640.0260.03LUC0002DD88.8989.660.762450.0250.02LUC0002DD90.5791.490.912090.0210.02LUC0002DD93.4794.531.072470.0250.03LUC0002DD97.7398.801.072440.0240.03LUC0002DD139.03139.640.612590.0260.02LUC0003DD19.1021.382.294380.0440.10LUC0003DD28.8530.531.683160.0320.05LUC0003DD35.8636.320.463230.0320.01LUC0003DD37.8440.282.442280.0230.06LUC0004DD23.0324.251.222350.0240.03LUC0004DD24.8630.345.495080.0510.28LUC0004DD34.6135.981.374930.0490.07LUC0004DD60.5261.741.223600.0360.04500 ppm (minimum interval 0.3 metre / 1 foot)Hole IDFrom (m)To (m)Length (m)eU3O8 (ppm)eU3O8 (%)GT (m%)LUC0002DD46.6846.980.306650.0670.02LUC0002DD47.5948.661.078210.0820.09LUC0002DD48.9749.270.305990.0600.02LUC0004DD26.9928.971.988660.0870.17LUC0004DD34.9135.680.766480.0650.051 A Qualified Person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves, and Myriad is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves. See note about historical estimates.
2 The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target are conceptual in nature, there has been insufficient exploration to define a mineral resource, and it is uncertain whether further exploration will result in the Exploration Target being delineated as a mineral resource.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/310576
Source: Myriad Uranium Corp.
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Baker Avenue Asset Management LP ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšila podíl v NextEra Energy o 40,6 % na 145 423 akcií po nákupu dalších 41 958 kusů. Hodnota podílu činila 12 764 000 USD.
Baker Avenue Asset Management LP increased its holdings in shares of NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE:NEE – Free Report) by 40.6% in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 145,423 shares of the utilities provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 41,958 shares during the quarter. Baker Avenue Asset Management LP’s holdings in NextEra Energy were worth $12,764,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.
Other large investors have also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Norges Bank acquired a new stake in shares of NextEra Energy in the 4th quarter valued at approximately $2,816,327,000. Employees Provident Fund Board bought a new stake in shares of NextEra Energy during the 4th quarter worth about $240,840,000. Pictet Asset Management Holding SA grew its position in shares of NextEra Energy by 47.3% in the fourth quarter. Pictet Asset Management Holding SA now owns 9,254,022 shares of the utilities provider’s stock valued at $742,913,000 after purchasing an additional 2,972,924 shares during the last quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. grew its holdings in NextEra Energy by 1.0% in the 4th quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 216,033,697 shares of the utilities provider’s stock valued at $17,343,185,000 after buying an additional 2,234,176 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Amundi grew its stake in shares of NextEra Energy by 16.7% in the third quarter. Amundi now owns 12,461,783 shares of the utilities provider’s stock valued at $1,012,129,000 after acquiring an additional 1,780,881 shares in the last quarter. 78.72% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.
Analysts Set New Price Targets NEE has been the topic of a number of recent research reports. Erste Group Bank lowered NextEra Energy from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Thursday, June 25th. TD Cowen upped their price objective on shares of NextEra Energy from $99.00 to $101.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, April 27th. Mizuho set a $95.00 target price on NextEra Energy in a research report on Monday, July 27th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. raised their price target on shares of NextEra Energy from $100.00 to $105.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research note on Wednesday, May 13th. Finally, BTIG Research reaffirmed a “buy” rating and issued a $112.00 price objective on shares of NextEra Energy in a research note on Friday, April 24th. Seventeen investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and six have given a Hold rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $100.43.
View Our Latest Research Report on NEE NextEra Energy Trading Down 0.3% NYSE NEE opened at $85.98 on Thursday. The company has a quick ratio of 0.44, a current ratio of 0.53 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45. The business has a 50 day moving average price of $87.26 and a 200-day moving average price of $89.94. NextEra Energy, Inc. has a 52 week low of $69.24 and a 52 week high of $98.75. The company has a market cap of $179.33 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 19.32, a P/E/G ratio of 2.36 and a beta of 0.67.
NextEra Energy (NYSE:NEE – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings data on Friday, July 24th. The utilities provider reported $1.15 earnings per share for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.11 by $0.04. NextEra Energy had a net margin of 32.40% and a return on equity of 12.28%. The firm had revenue of $7.53 billion for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $8.11 billion. During the same period last year, the firm earned $1.05 earnings per share. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 12.4% compared to the same quarter last year. NextEra Energy has set its FY 2026 guidance at 3.920-4.020 EPS. As a group, equities analysts expect that NextEra Energy, Inc. will post 4.01 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
NextEra Energy Dividend Announcement The business also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 15th. Shareholders of record on Friday, August 28th will be paid a dividend of $0.6232 per share. The ex-dividend date is Friday, August 28th. This represents a $2.49 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.9%. NextEra Energy’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 55.96%.
NextEra Energy Company Profile (Free Report)
NextEra Energy, Inc (NYSE: NEE), headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida, is a leading clean energy company with both regulated utility operations and competitive renewable generation businesses. The company’s principal operating subsidiaries include Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), a regulated electric utility serving customers in Florida, and NextEra Energy Resources, which develops, constructs, owns and operates a large portfolio of wind, solar and energy storage projects. Together these businesses provide electricity supply, transmission and distribution services as well as utility-scale renewable generation and related services.
NextEra’s activities cover the full lifecycle of power assets, from project development and construction to operation, maintenance and asset optimization.
Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than NextEra Energy Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for NextEra Energy Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for NextEra Energy and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Aurora Investment Counsel ve 2. čtvrtletí nově koupila 12 763 akcií společnosti Globe Life za zhruba 2,28 milionu USD. Podíl tvoří 1,2 % portfolia a jde o 29. největší pozici.
Aurora Investment Counsel purchased a new position in shares of Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL – Free Report) during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor purchased 12,763 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $2,280,000. Globe Life accounts for 1.2% of Aurora Investment Counsel’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 29th biggest position.
A number of other hedge funds also recently bought and sold shares of the stock. Compound Planning Inc. grew its holdings in Globe Life by 4.3% during the 4th quarter. Compound Planning Inc. now owns 1,968 shares of the company’s stock worth $275,000 after acquiring an additional 82 shares in the last quarter. Root Financial Partners LLC raised its holdings in shares of Globe Life by 23.3% in the 1st quarter. Root Financial Partners LLC now owns 439 shares of the company’s stock valued at $61,000 after purchasing an additional 83 shares in the last quarter. Parallel Advisors LLC lifted its position in shares of Globe Life by 5.6% during the 4th quarter. Parallel Advisors LLC now owns 1,651 shares of the company’s stock worth $231,000 after purchasing an additional 87 shares during the last quarter. First United Bank & Trust lifted its position in shares of Globe Life by 2.1% during the 1st quarter. First United Bank & Trust now owns 4,355 shares of the company’s stock worth $606,000 after purchasing an additional 90 shares during the last quarter. Finally, EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC lifted its position in shares of Globe Life by 4.0% during the 1st quarter. EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC now owns 2,366 shares of the company’s stock worth $329,000 after purchasing an additional 91 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 81.61% of the company’s stock.
Globe Life Stock Performance Shares of GL opened at $171.74 on Thursday. The company’s 50 day simple moving average is $178.16 and its 200-day simple moving average is $158.21. The firm has a market cap of $13.20 billion, a PE ratio of 11.40 and a beta of 0.48. Globe Life Inc. has a 12-month low of $127.85 and a 12-month high of $191.55. The company has a current ratio of 0.07, a quick ratio of 0.07 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43.
Globe Life (NYSE:GL – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, July 22nd. The company reported $3.61 EPS for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $3.67 by ($0.06). Globe Life had a net margin of 19.58% and a return on equity of 20.52%. The business had revenue of $1.60 billion during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $1.59 billion. During the same quarter last year, the company earned $3.05 EPS. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 8.0% compared to the same quarter last year. Globe Life has set its FY 2026 guidance at 15.550-15.950 EPS. As a group, equities analysts predict that Globe Life Inc. will post 15.71 EPS for the current year. Globe Life Dividend Announcement The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, October 30th. Investors of record on Monday, October 5th will be issued a dividend of $0.33 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, October 5th. This represents a $1.32 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 0.8%. Globe Life’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is currently 8.76%.
Globe Life declared that its Board of Directors has initiated a stock repurchase plan on Monday, August 10th that permits the company to repurchase $2.50 billion in outstanding shares. This repurchase authorization permits the company to repurchase up to 17.7% of its shares through open market purchases. Shares repurchase plans are often a sign that the company’s board believes its stock is undervalued.
Analyst Ratings Changes Several equities analysts recently commented on the company. Piper Sandler increased their target price on Globe Life from $175.00 to $200.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a report on Wednesday, July 15th. Wells Fargo & Company lifted their price target on Globe Life from $172.00 to $193.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Thursday, July 9th. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods lowered their price objective on Globe Life from $192.00 to $190.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research report on Friday, July 24th. Truist Financial upped their price objective on Globe Life from $180.00 to $185.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, April 24th. Finally, Jefferies Financial Group increased their price objective on Globe Life from $147.00 to $166.00 and gave the company a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, July 10th. One analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, eight have assigned a Buy rating and two have assigned a Hold rating to the company. According to data from MarketBeat, the company currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $191.67.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Analysis on GL
Insider Transactions at Globe Life In other news, CEO James Matthew Darden sold 50,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, July 31st. The stock was sold at an average price of $182.43, for a total value of $9,121,500.00. Following the transaction, the chief executive officer owned 58,451 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $10,663,215.93. The trade was a 46.10% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink. Also, CEO Frank M. Svoboda sold 20,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, May 22nd. The shares were sold at an average price of $156.68, for a total value of $3,133,600.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief executive officer directly owned 54,020 shares in the company, valued at approximately $8,463,853.60. The trade was a 27.02% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. Insiders have sold a total of 179,844 shares of company stock worth $31,616,279 over the last three months. 2.11% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.
Globe Life Company Profile (Free Report)
Globe Life, traded on the NYSE under the symbol GL, is a U.S.-based insurance holding company that underwrites and distributes a range of life and supplemental health insurance products. Through its subsidiary brands—Globe Life, American Income Life, Liberty National Life, United American Insurance Company and Family Heritage Life—it offers term life, whole life, fixed annuities and supplemental health coverage designed to meet the needs of individuals and families across various socioeconomic segments.
The company’s product suite includes low-cost, easy-to-understand life insurance policies, accidental death and dismemberment coverage, hospital indemnity plans and specified disease insurance.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Globe Life Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding GL? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Globe Life Inc. (NYSE:GL – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Globe Life Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Globe Life and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Abacus FCF Advisors LLC koupila nový podíl ve společnosti Gilead Sciences: 59 974 akcií za zhruba 7,577 milionu USD. Akcie GILD zároveň otevřely o 2,9 % výše.
Abacus FCF Advisors LLC bought a new stake in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD – Free Report) during the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor bought 59,974 shares of the biopharmaceutical company’s stock, valued at approximately $7,577,000.
A number of other hedge funds have also made changes to their positions in GILD. Persistent Asset Partners Ltd purchased a new stake in shares of Gilead Sciences during the second quarter worth $25,000. Strategic Investment Solutions Inc. IL acquired a new stake in shares of Gilead Sciences during the 4th quarter valued at about $25,000. Vermillion & White Wealth Management Group LLC grew its stake in shares of Gilead Sciences by 71.4% in the 4th quarter. Vermillion & White Wealth Management Group LLC now owns 204 shares of the biopharmaceutical company’s stock valued at $25,000 after buying an additional 85 shares in the last quarter. Quattro Advisors LLC acquired a new position in Gilead Sciences in the fourth quarter worth approximately $26,000. Finally, Wealth Preservation Advisors LLC increased its holdings in Gilead Sciences by 60.0% in the fourth quarter. Wealth Preservation Advisors LLC now owns 216 shares of the biopharmaceutical company’s stock worth $27,000 after buying an additional 81 shares during the last quarter. 83.67% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Analysts Set New Price Targets GILD has been the subject of several recent research reports. Truist Financial decreased their target price on shares of Gilead Sciences from $157.00 to $156.00 and set a “buy” rating for the company in a research report on Tuesday, July 7th. Leerink Partners lowered shares of Gilead Sciences from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and reduced their price objective for the company from $146.00 to $127.00 in a research note on Tuesday, July 21st. Morgan Stanley decreased their price objective on shares of Gilead Sciences from $166.00 to $165.00 and set an “overweight” rating for the company in a report on Monday, July 27th. Royal Bank Of Canada increased their target price on shares of Gilead Sciences from $120.00 to $123.00 and gave the stock a “sector perform” rating in a research report on Wednesday, August 5th. Finally, Daiwa Securities Group cut their target price on Gilead Sciences from $161.00 to $150.00 and set an “outperform” rating on the stock in a report on Tuesday, May 19th. Twenty-four equities research analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and five have issued a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $158.04.
View Our Latest Research Report on GILD Gilead Sciences Trading Up 2.9% Shares of NASDAQ:GILD opened at $147.60 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.03, a quick ratio of 1.09 and a current ratio of 1.27. The stock’s 50-day moving average is $131.21 and its 200-day moving average is $136.51. The company has a market cap of $183.02 billion, a P/E ratio of -55.28 and a beta of 0.32. Gilead Sciences, Inc. has a 52-week low of $108.46 and a 52-week high of $157.29.
Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD – Get Free Report) last announced its earnings results on Monday, August 3rd. The biopharmaceutical company reported ($6.75) earnings per share for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of ($7.25) by $0.50. The firm had revenue of $7.80 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $7.40 billion. Gilead Sciences had a negative return on equity of 2.11% and a negative net margin of 10.64%.The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 10.6% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company earned $2.01 EPS. Equities research analysts predict that Gilead Sciences, Inc. will post -0.53 earnings per share for the current year.
Gilead Sciences Announces Dividend The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 29th. Shareholders of record on Tuesday, September 15th will be issued a $0.82 dividend. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, September 15th. This represents a $3.28 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 2.2%. Gilead Sciences’s dividend payout ratio is -122.85%.
Gilead Sciences News Roundup Here are the key news stories impacting Gilead Sciences this week:
Positive Sentiment: BMO Capital reaffirmed its Buy rating on Gilead, supporting the bullish view that the company’s recent momentum can continue. BMO Capital reaffirms Buy rating Positive Sentiment: Zacks Research raised estimates for third-quarter 2026 EPS to $1.93 from $1.84, fourth-quarter 2026 EPS to $2.14 from $2.07, and full-year 2027 EPS to $9.30 from $9.11. It also lifted estimates for parts of 2027, indicating improving expectations for near-term earnings. Gilead Sciences analyst estimates Positive Sentiment: Investors remain focused on Gilead’s expanding HIV portfolio. Biktarvy continues to anchor sales, while Yeztugo and additional pipeline programs could create new treatment and prevention opportunities. The company’s latest reported revenue also increased 10.6% year over year to $7.8 billion, exceeding expectations. Gilead’s expanding HIV portfolio Positive Sentiment: Gilead’s quarterly dividend of $0.82, equivalent to $3.28 annually, provides ongoing income support and reinforces its appeal to defensive and healthcare-focused investors. Neutral Sentiment: Zacks reduced estimates for first-quarter 2028 EPS to $2.14 from $2.21, second-quarter 2028 EPS to $2.27 from $2.33, and full-year 2028 EPS to $9.58 from $10.00. These cuts temper the otherwise positive near-term revisions and suggest some uncertainty about longer-term growth. Negative Sentiment: Chief Commercial Officer Johanna Mercier sold 28,000 shares, while CFO Andrew Dickinson sold 3,000 shares. Both transactions were made under pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 plans, limiting their significance, but the sales may modestly weigh on sentiment. Insiders Place Their Bets In other news, insider Johanna Mercier sold 28,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, August 17th. The shares were sold at an average price of $137.64, for a total transaction of $3,853,920.00. Following the transaction, the insider owned 118,234 shares in the company, valued at approximately $16,273,727.76. The trade was a 19.15% decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through the SEC website. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, CEO Daniel Patrick O’day sold 15,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, August 3rd. The shares were sold at an average price of $130.31, for a total transaction of $1,954,650.00. Following the transaction, the chief executive officer directly owned 592,133 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $77,160,851.23. This represents a 2.47% decrease in their position. Additional details regarding this sale are available in the official SEC disclosure. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Insiders have sold 82,000 shares of company stock worth $10,837,860 in the last ninety days. Insiders own 0.30% of the company’s stock.
(Free Report)
Gilead Sciences, Inc, founded in 1987 and headquartered in Foster City, California, is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of medicines in areas of high unmet medical need. The company initially built its reputation in antiviral therapies and has since expanded into oncology, cell therapy and inflammatory diseases. Gilead operates a global research and commercial organization, conducting clinical development and selling medicines in markets around the world.
Gilead’s product portfolio is anchored by antiviral therapies for HIV and viral hepatitis.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Gilead Sciences Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding GILD? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Gilead Sciences Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Gilead Sciences and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Algebris UK Ltd. grew its holdings in American International Group, Inc. (NYSE:AIG – Free Report) by 98.4% during the second quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm owned 1,235,231 shares of the insurance provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 612,790 shares during the quarter. American International Group comprises about 6.0% of Algebris UK Ltd.’s portfolio, making the stock its 2nd biggest position. Algebris UK Ltd. owned approximately 0.23% of American International Group worth $91,772,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.
Several other institutional investors and hedge funds have also bought and sold shares of AIG. Brighton Jones LLC purchased a new position in American International Group during the fourth quarter worth about $1,091,000. Sivia Capital Partners LLC increased its position in shares of American International Group by 30.7% during the 2nd quarter. Sivia Capital Partners LLC now owns 5,050 shares of the insurance provider’s stock valued at $432,000 after purchasing an additional 1,185 shares during the last quarter. Flow Traders U.S. LLC bought a new stake in shares of American International Group during the 2nd quarter worth $217,000. Ieq Capital LLC boosted its holdings in shares of American International Group by 11.5% in the 2nd quarter. Ieq Capital LLC now owns 244,871 shares of the insurance provider’s stock worth $20,958,000 after buying an additional 25,311 shares during the last quarter. Finally, HUB Investment Partners LLC purchased a new position in shares of American International Group in the 2nd quarter worth about $269,000. 90.60% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.
Analyst Ratings Changes A number of research firms recently issued reports on AIG. Barclays raised their price objective on shares of American International Group from $80.00 to $81.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a report on Friday, August 7th. Morgan Stanley dropped their price target on American International Group from $82.00 to $81.00 and set an “equal weight” rating on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, August 12th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted their price objective on American International Group from $86.00 to $90.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a research note on Monday, July 20th. BMO Capital Markets lifted their price objective on shares of American International Group from $83.00 to $89.00 in a research note on Thursday, May 7th. Finally, Weiss Ratings upgraded American International Group from a “hold (c+)” rating to a “buy (b-)” rating in a research report on Thursday, July 2nd. Seven equities research analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and twelve have given a Hold rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, American International Group has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $88.28.
View Our Latest Stock Analysis on AIG Insiders Place Their Bets In other American International Group news, insider Peter Zaffino sold 36,829 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, August 13th. The shares were sold at an average price of $76.14, for a total value of $2,804,160.06. Following the sale, the insider owned 556,004 shares in the company, valued at approximately $42,334,144.56. This represents a 6.21% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Company insiders own 0.60% of the company’s stock.
American International Group Trading Down 0.4% Shares of AIG opened at $75.81 on Thursday. American International Group, Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $71.25 and a fifty-two week high of $87.29. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.22, a quick ratio of 0.61 and a current ratio of 0.61. The firm has a 50 day moving average price of $77.67 and a 200-day moving average price of $76.96. The firm has a market cap of $39.64 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 13.86, a PEG ratio of 0.69 and a beta of 0.53.
American International Group (NYSE:AIG – Get Free Report) last released its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, August 6th. The insurance provider reported $2.00 EPS for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.92 by $0.08. American International Group had a return on equity of 11.05% and a net margin of 11.13%.The business had revenue of $7.08 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $7.25 billion. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company posted $1.81 EPS. As a group, equities research analysts forecast that American International Group, Inc. will post 8.01 earnings per share for the current year.
American International Group Announces Dividend The firm also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Wednesday, September 30th. Investors of record on Wednesday, September 16th will be paid a dividend of $0.50 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Wednesday, September 16th. This represents a $2.00 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.6%. American International Group’s payout ratio is presently 36.56%.
(Free Report)
American International Group, Inc (AIG) is a global insurance holding company that provides a broad range of property-casualty insurance, specialty insurance, and risk management solutions to institutional, commercial and individual customers. Through its operating subsidiaries, AIG underwrites commercial and personal lines products—ranging from general liability, property, and casualty coverages to specialty lines such as professional liability, surety, cyber and marine—along with related services designed to help clients manage and transfer risk.
The company also has a long history in life insurance, retirement solutions and asset management through businesses that have been restructured or separated over time.
Featured Articles Five stocks we like better than American International Group Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for American International Group Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for American International Group and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
PBOC posílila denní fixing USD/CNY na 6,7808 z 6,7854 v předchozí seanci, což je další signál podpory jüanu. Čína zároveň ponechala základní úrokové sazby beze změny.
The Chinese Yuan received a firmer official signal after the PBOC set the USD/CNY reference rate at 6.7808, stronger than the previous 6.7854 fixing. China's central bank strengthened its daily Yuan reference rate on Thursday, setting USD/CNY exchange rate at 6.7808 compared with 6.7854 in the previous session.
The 46-pip shift continues a period in which the People's Bank of China has used the fixing to guide the currency more firmly while balancing pressure from exporters and the domestic economy.
The stronger midpoint came on the same day that China left its benchmark loan prime rates unchanged for a fifteenth consecutive month.
The one-year LPR stayed at 3.00%, while the five-year rate remained at 3.50%.
PBOC Keeps Policy Support Targeted The combination of a firmer fixing and unchanged lending rates suggests Beijing remains reluctant to deploy broad monetary easing that could undermine the currency.
Foreign exchange analysts at ING noted that the PBOC has increasingly guided daily fixes stronger and that exporters have tended to sell Dollars into USD/CNY rallies.
ING economists Deepali Bhargava and Lynn Song maintain a 6.67-6.92 forecast band for the remainder of 2026 and favour “further CNY strength heading into 2027.” Read our latest USD/CNY forecast sentiment survey for 2026, 2027 and 2028 here.
The official fixing does not guarantee the direction of USD/CNY, but it remains an important policy signal because onshore trading is permitted only within a band around the midpoint.
Further stronger-than-expected fixings would reinforce the view that authorities are comfortable with gradual Yuan appreciation, while renewed economic weakness could test that preference.
Exchange Rates UK Research Our currency coverage draws on live market data, official economic releases and published bank research.
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (NYSE:EL – Get Free Report) was the recipient of some unusual options trading activity on Wednesday. Traders purchased 7,138 call options on the company. This is an increase of approximately 46% compared to the average daily volume of 4,904 call options.
Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades EL has been the topic of a number of analyst reports. Canaccord Genuity Group increased their target price on shares of Estee Lauder Companies from $80.00 to $85.00 and gave the stock a “hold” rating in a research report on Monday, May 4th. TD Cowen lifted their price target on shares of Estee Lauder Companies from $85.00 to $90.00 and gave the company a “hold” rating in a research report on Tuesday, July 21st. Sanford C. Bernstein assumed coverage on Estee Lauder Companies in a research report on Friday, June 12th. They set a “market perform” rating and a $82.00 price target on the stock. Telsey Advisory Group lowered their price objective on Estee Lauder Companies from $105.00 to $90.00 and set a “market perform” rating on the stock in a research note on Monday, May 4th. Finally, Royal Bank Of Canada reaffirmed an “outperform” rating and issued a $111.00 price objective on shares of Estee Lauder Companies in a report on Monday. One analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, eight have given a Buy rating, ten have assigned a Hold rating and two have given a Sell rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat, the company currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $96.84.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Analysis on Estee Lauder Companies
Estee Lauder Companies Price Performance EL stock opened at $98.10 on Thursday. The company’s 50-day moving average price is $84.40 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $86.67. The firm has a market cap of $35.49 billion, a P/E ratio of -140.15, a P/E/G ratio of 0.66 and a beta of 1.25. The company has a quick ratio of 0.94, a current ratio of 1.27 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.71. Estee Lauder Companies has a 12 month low of $66.22 and a 12 month high of $121.64. Estee Lauder Companies (NYSE:EL – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, August 19th. The company reported $0.39 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.32 by $0.07. Estee Lauder Companies had a negative net margin of 1.67% and a positive return on equity of 20.66%. The company had revenue of $3.64 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $3.55 billion. During the same quarter in the prior year, the firm posted $0.09 EPS. The firm’s quarterly revenue was up 6.3% on a year-over-year basis. Estee Lauder Companies has set its FY 2027 guidance at 3.100-3.350 EPS. On average, analysts anticipate that Estee Lauder Companies will post 2.41 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Estee Lauder Companies Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 15th. Shareholders of record on Monday, August 31st will be given a dividend of $0.35 per share. This represents a $1.40 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.4%. The ex-dividend date is Monday, August 31st. Estee Lauder Companies’s payout ratio is currently -200.00%.
Key Estee Lauder Companies News Here are the key news stories impacting Estee Lauder Companies this week:
Positive Sentiment: Fiscal fourth-quarter adjusted earnings were $0.39 per share, above the $0.32 analyst consensus and up sharply from $0.09 a year earlier. Revenue rose approximately 6% year over year to $3.64 billion, exceeding expectations of $3.55 billion. Estee Lauder Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates, Sales Up 6% Year over Year Positive Sentiment: Management affirmed fiscal 2027 organic sales-growth guidance of 3% to 5% and raised its adjusted operating-margin outlook to 12.7%–13.5%, signaling stronger profitability. Fiscal 2027 revenue is projected at $15.5 billion–$15.8 billion, while adjusted EPS guidance of $3.10–$3.35 brackets the $3.18 consensus estimate. Estee Lauder Forecasts Annual Profit Above Estimates on Strong China Demand Positive Sentiment: Growth was broad-based across regions, with particular investor focus on resilient China demand, premium fragrances and improving Skin Care performance. CEO Stéphane de la Faverie said the company has “great momentum” and is expanding margins. Estée Lauder CEO Says Growth Is Back Positive Sentiment: The restructuring program is reportedly outperforming expectations, with benefits at the high end of the prior target range and an estimated net workforce reduction of roughly 10,000 positions. Investors view the cost savings as supportive of the margin recovery. Institutional Investors Weigh In On Estee Lauder Companies Large investors have recently modified their holdings of the business. REAP Financial Group LLC acquired a new position in shares of Estee Lauder Companies during the 4th quarter worth $27,000. Investors Towarzystwo Funduszy Inwestycyjnych Spolka Akcyjna bought a new stake in shares of Estee Lauder Companies during the 4th quarter worth $27,000. N.E.W. Advisory Services LLC boosted its stake in Estee Lauder Companies by 39.1% in the fourth quarter. N.E.W. Advisory Services LLC now owns 324 shares of the company’s stock valued at $34,000 after buying an additional 91 shares in the last quarter. DV Equities LLC acquired a new stake in Estee Lauder Companies in the fourth quarter valued at about $36,000. Finally, Trust Co. of Vermont bought a new position in Estee Lauder Companies in the second quarter valued at about $28,000. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 55.15% of the company’s stock.
(Get Free Report)
Estée Lauder Companies Inc (NYSE: EL) is a global leader in prestige beauty that develops, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products. Founded in 1946 by Estée Lauder, the company has grown from a small family business into a multinational consumer-products enterprise headquartered in New York City. Its activities span product research and development, brand and product marketing, manufacturing and global distribution across multiple retail channels.
The company’s portfolio includes a mix of legacy and prestige brands that target different consumer segments and price points, with well-known names such as Estée Lauder, Clinique, MAC, La Mer and Jo Malone among others.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Estee Lauder Companies Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Receive News & Ratings for Estee Lauder Companies Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Estee Lauder Companies and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
U velkých regionálních bank má v dohledné době zůstat kvalita aktiv utlumená, ale nižší sazby, lepší poptávka po úvěrech a digitalizace mají dál podporovat čistý úrokový výnos i marže.
For Immediate ReleaseChicago, IL – August 20, 2026 – Today, Zacks Equity U.S. Bancorp (USB - Free Report) , State Street Corp. (STT - Free Report) and Northern Trust Corp. (NTRS - Free Report)
The Zacks Major Regional Banks’ asset quality is expected to remain subdued in the near term due to a challenging operating backdrop. While the Federal Reserve is likely to keep rates unchanged in the near term, industry players should continue benefiting from relatively lower rates. Combined with decent economic growth and improving loan demand, this is expected to support expansion in net interest income and margins.
Business restructuring and expansion efforts and ongoing digitization should provide additional support. Major regional banks like U.S. Bancorp, State Street Corp. and Northern Trust Corp. are well-positioned to gain.
About the IndustryThe Zacks Major Regional Banks industry includes the nation’s largest banks in terms of assets, with most operating globally. The financial performance of these banks largely depends on the nation’s economic health. As banks are involved in numerous complex financial activities, they are required to comply with stringent regulations set by the Federal Reserve and other regulatory agencies.
Apart from traditional banking services, which are the source of net interest income (NII), major regional banks provide a wide array of other financial services and products to retail, corporate and institutional clients, both domestic and global. These include credit and debit cards, mortgage banking, wealth management and investment banking, among others. A significant revenue source for these banks is fees and commissions earned from these services.
4 Key Themes to Influence the Major Regional Banks IndustryNo Change in Interest Rates:The Fed has paused interest rate cuts and turned hawkish because of rising inflation numbers amid the ongoing geopolitical conflict. Market participants expect at least one rate hike before 2026 ends, with no chance of further cuts till mid-2027. As such, major regional banks are likely to keep benefiting from relatively lower rates (compared with historically higher rates in 2022 and 2023) as deposit and funding costs fall/stabilize and the lending backdrop gradually improves. As such, industry players’ NII and margins are expected to keep expanding.
Rise in Loan Demand: The central bank’s aggressive monetary tightening in 2021 and 2022 weighed on loan demand amid concerns over a potential economic downturn or recession. However, the trend has reversed since then. According to the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections released in June 2026, U.S. economic growth is expected to remain decent. This, coupled with lower borrowing costs and greater clarity on several macroeconomic factors, is likely to support loan demand. Major regional banks are expected to see a solid increase in demand for both wholesale and consumer loans.
Restructuring Initiatives: Major regional banks are taking steps to diversify their revenue streams and reduce their reliance on spread income. Business restructuring remains a key priority, enabling banks to support technological advancement, expand their domestic and international operations, and enhance profitability.
Industry participants are investing heavily in artificial intelligence and other digital platforms, while also pursuing partnerships with or acquisitions of technology and service providers. Several major regional banks are aggressively expanding their footprints across the United States and international markets. At the same time, many are reassessing their business models to streamline operations, improve efficiency and exit less profitable businesses.
Asset Quality: Mounting worries about the economy and uncertainty around trade policies pursued by the Trump administration have added to inflationary pressure. Renewed Middle East tensions and oil-shock risks are further lifting costs, squeezing household and business budgets and, in turn, weakening borrowers’ repayment capacity. In response, major regional banks are less likely to lower loan-loss reserves to cushion against potential defaults and payment delays. While disciplined underwriting and generally resilient borrowers have helped industry players keep asset quality under control, several key credit indicators have drifted above pre-pandemic levels.
Zacks Industry Rank Indicates OptimismThe Zacks Major Regional Banks industry is a nine-stock group within the broader Zacks Finance sector. The industry currently carries a Zacks Industry Rank #55, which places it in the top 22% of more than 240 Zacks industries.
The group’s Zacks Industry Rank, which is the average of the Zacks Rank of all the member stocks, indicates outperformance in the near term. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outpace the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.
The industry’s positioning in the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries is a result of an encouraging earnings outlook for the constituent companies in aggregate. The aggregate estimate revision trend reflects an improving situation. Over the past year, the industry’s earnings estimates for 2026 have been revised 9% upward, and those for 2027 are up 7.9%.
Before we present a handful of major regional bank stocks to bet on, let’s take a look at the industry’s recent stock market performance and valuation picture.
Industry's Stock Market Performance Is SolidThe Zacks Major Regional Banks industry outperformed the S&P 500 composite and the sector over the past two years.
Stocks in this industry have collectively jumped 64.6% over the past two years. In the same time frame, the Zacks S&P 500 composite has surged 42.8%, and the Zacks Finance sector rallied 35.3%.
Industry's Valuation is AttractiveOne might get a good sense of the industry’s relative valuation by looking at its price-to-tangible book ratio (P/TBV), which is commonly used for valuing banks because of large variations in their earnings from one quarter to the next.
The industry currently has a trailing 12-month P/TBV of 3.08X. This compares with the highest level of 3.21X, the lowest of 1.85X and the median of 2.41X over the past five years. The industry is trading at a huge discount compared with the market at large, as the trailing 12-month P/TBV for the S&P 500 composite is 10.18X.
As finance stocks typically have a lower P/TBV ratio, comparing major regional banks with the S&P 500 may not make sense to many investors. However, comparing the group’s P/TBV ratio with that of the broader sector ensures that the group is trading at a solid discount. The Zacks Finance sector’s trailing 12-month P/TBV came in at 6.05X. This is above the Zacks Major Regional Banks industry’s ratio.
3 Major Regional Banks to ConsiderU.S. Bancorp: Headquartered in Minneapolis, MN, U.S. Bancorp provides banking and investment services, mainly operating in the Midwest and West regions of the United States. The company has expanded through several strategic acquisitions over the years, which have strengthened its market position, digital capabilities and diversified revenue streams.
In June 2026, the company completed the acquisition of BTIG, expanding its capital markets platform with institutional equity sales and trading, equity capital markets, electronic trading and M&A advisory capabilities. This, along with several other expansion efforts, will continue to strengthen USB’s fee-based businesses.
The company’s NII has been rising over the past few years. Going forward, less deposit migration, relatively lower rates and stabilizing funding costs will continue to support NII and NIM expansion. U.S. Bancorp has experienced steady growth in total loans and deposits during the past few years as it continues to expand and deepen relationships with current customers as well as acquire new customers and market share.
The company’s capital distributions seem impressive. Following the successful completion of the 2026 stress test, management plans to increase the quarterly dividend by 4% to 54 cents per share in the third quarter of 2026, subject to board approval. The company also continues to repurchase shares under its $5 billion buyback program. Given its consistent earnings and decent liquidity position, the company’s capital deployment activities seem to be sustainable.
USB, which carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), has a market cap of $100.9 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings indicates growth of 13% and 10.4% for 2026 and 2027, respectively. The stock has rallied 21.6% over the past three months.
State Street:Headquartered in Boston, MA, State Street provides a range of products and services for institutional investors worldwide through its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2026, the company reported record assets under custody and administration (AUC/A) of $57.9 trillion and assets under management (AUM) of $6.28 trillion.
State Street's fee-based model continues to benefit from its scale in custody, asset management and markets, supported by strong flows, product expansion and broader distribution. While the company’s total fee revenues declined in 2022 and 2023, the metric saw a four-year (2021-2025) CAGR of 2.3%, mainly driven by higher client activity and significant market volatility. AUC/A and AUM recorded a CAGR of 5.3% and 8.2%, respectively, in the same time frame.
At the end of the first quarter, STT reported $2.93 trillion of AUC/A to be installed and $335 million of servicing fee revenues to be installed. This provides better forward visibility beyond near-term market swings, while continued Alpha mandate wins reinforce demand for integrated front-to-back solutions. State Street remains well-placed for fundamental business activities, given its global exposure and a broad array of innovative products and services.
This Zacks Rank #2 company has been using partnerships, minority stakes and strategic bolt-on acquisitions to expand growth platforms across investment, distribution and technology. Despite lower rates, State Street’s NII and net interest margin are expected to witness decent improvements in the near term. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
STT has a market cap of $48.7 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings indicates growth of 30.5% for 2026 and 11.2% for 2027. Over the past three months, the stock has gained 27.2%.
Northern Trust: With total assets worth $179.3 billion as of June 30, 2026, Northern Trust is a leading provider of wealth management, asset servicing, asset management and banking solutions to corporations, institutions, families and individuals.
Organic growth is the company’s key strength. Its revenues witnessed a CAGR of 5.7% over the last five years (2020-2025), driven by rising non-interest income and NII. As the client base expands, the company expects to see a steady rise in loan activity, particularly as its wealth management services attract more clients. This ongoing focus on wealth management is expected to drive growth in the lending portfolio.
Following the launch of Family Office Solutions for ultra-high-net-worth clients, NTRS’ investment management division, Northern Trust Asset Management, partnered with Envestnet in January to expand access to its tax-managed direct indexing solutions, enhancing distribution reach for this client segment. These initiatives, along with continued asset servicing wins and low double-digit wealth management trust fee growth, are expected to support fee income and strengthen organic growth momentum.
NTRS is undertaking expense management efforts to tackle expense growth and support operating leverage. It is focused on disciplined headcount management, vendor consolidation, rationalization of its real estate footprint and process automation. Through such efforts, it will likely improve productivity and meet the financial targets.
NTRS has a market cap of $34.9 billion. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings indicates 28.6% and 9.1% growth in 2026 and 2027, respectively. The company, which carries a Zacks Rank of 2, witnessed a 15.6% rise in its stock price over the past three months.
Why Haven't You Looked at Zacks' Top Stocks?Since 2000, our top stock-picking strategies have blown away the S&P's +7.7% average gain per year. Amazingly, they soared with average gains of +48.4%, +50.2% and +56.7% per year.
Today you can access their live picks without cost or obligation.
See Stocks Free >>
Join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZacksInvestmentResearch/
Zacks Investment Research is under common control with affiliated entities (including a broker-dealer and an investment adviser), which may engage in transactions involving the foregoing securities for the clients of such affiliates.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release
AssuredPartners Investment Advisors LLC získala ve 2. čtvrtletí nový podíl v Allstate: 3 309 akcií za zhruba 787 000 USD. Akcie ALL v úvodu obchodování klesly o 0,3 %.
AssuredPartners Investment Advisors LLC purchased a new stake in The Allstate Corporation (NYSE:ALL – Free Report) in the second quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor purchased 3,309 shares of the insurance provider’s stock, valued at approximately $787,000.
Several other institutional investors have also made changes to their positions in ALL. Gables Capital Management Inc. acquired a new position in shares of Allstate in the 2nd quarter worth approximately $26,000. Allied Private Wealth LLC bought a new position in shares of Allstate in the second quarter valued at about $29,000. Kelleher Financial Advisors acquired a new stake in shares of Allstate in the 2nd quarter valued at $28,000. MV Capital Management Inc. acquired a new position in shares of Allstate during the fourth quarter valued at $25,000. Finally, Navalign LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Allstate during the 4th quarter worth approximately $27,000. 76.47% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.
Allstate Stock Down 0.3% ALL stock opened at $260.24 on Thursday. The Allstate Corporation has a 52 week low of $188.08 and a 52 week high of $277.22. The business has a 50-day simple moving average of $249.00 and a 200 day simple moving average of $224.35. The company has a quick ratio of 0.36, a current ratio of 0.36 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.24. The company has a market cap of $65.80 billion, a PE ratio of 5.20, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.40 and a beta of 0.16.
Allstate (NYSE:ALL – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, August 5th. The insurance provider reported $8.99 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $6.06 by $2.93. Allstate had a net margin of 18.97% and a return on equity of 41.64%. The firm had revenue of $15.43 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $15.46 billion. During the same period in the prior year, the company posted $5.94 earnings per share. The business’s revenue for the quarter was up 11.8% on a year-over-year basis. Sell-side analysts anticipate that The Allstate Corporation will post 34.5 EPS for the current fiscal year. Allstate Announces Dividend The company also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, October 1st. Investors of record on Monday, August 31st will be issued a dividend of $1.08 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, August 31st. This represents a $4.32 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 1.7%. Allstate’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 8.63%.
Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades A number of research analysts have issued reports on ALL shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted their target price on Allstate from $282.00 to $292.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research note on Tuesday, August 11th. Zacks Research upgraded shares of Allstate from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note on Monday. Wall Street Zen raised shares of Allstate from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, July 20th. HSBC downgraded shares of Allstate from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and increased their price objective for the stock from $244.00 to $264.00 in a research note on Monday, July 6th. Finally, Weiss Ratings upgraded Allstate from a “buy (a-)” rating to a “buy (a)” rating in a report on Thursday, August 6th. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, five have issued a Buy rating, nine have issued a Hold rating and three have issued a Sell rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat, the stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $265.53.
Get Our Latest Research Report on Allstate
Insider Transactions at Allstate In related news, insider John E. Dugenske sold 32,996 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Friday, August 7th. The stock was sold at an average price of $269.33, for a total transaction of $8,886,812.68. Following the sale, the insider owned 13,054 shares in the company, valued at $3,515,833.82. The trade was a 71.65% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink. Also, insider Mark Q. Prindiville sold 1,550 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, May 22nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $216.27, for a total value of $335,218.50. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider directly owned 27,558 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $5,959,968.66. The trade was a 5.32% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. In the last 90 days, insiders sold 92,996 shares of company stock worth $24,543,894. Insiders own 1.55% of the company’s stock.
Allstate Company Profile (Free Report)
Allstate Corporation is a publicly traded insurance company headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, and is one of the largest personal lines property and casualty insurers in the United States. Founded in 1931 as a subsidiary of Sears, Roebuck and Co, Allstate has grown into a diversified insurer that serves millions of consumers and businesses through a mix of distribution channels and product offerings.
The company underwrites a broad range of insurance products, with primary emphasis on auto and homeowners coverage.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Allstate Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Allstate Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Allstate and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Společnost NetEase oznámila za 2. čtvrtletí tržby ve výši 30,1 miliardy RMB, což je meziročně o 7,9 % více. Čistý zisk připadá na akcionáře a klesl na 7,0 miliardy RMB.
, /PRNewswire/ -- NetEase, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTES and HKEX: 9999, "NetEase" or the "Company"), a leading internet and game services provider, today announced its unaudited financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026.
In this results announcement, "we", "us", and "our" refer to the Company and where the context otherwise requires, the Group.
"Our robust performance in the first half of 2026 reflects players' growing enthusiasm for both our newly launched and established games, underscoring our ability to create distinctive and refreshing experiences with lasting appeal," said Mr. William Ding, Chief Executive Officer and Director of NetEase. "As we continue to strengthen both our live game operations and new title pipeline, we are sharpening our focus on original gameplay, cutting-edge technology and deeper global reach to support our enduring growth.
"Looking ahead, we will remain committed to creating original content that shapes industry trends, building evergreen franchises, and cultivating vibrant communities that sustain player engagement. Backed by disciplined execution and an expanding global presence, we aim to keep pushing creative boundaries, delivering exceptional gaming experiences and creating long-term value for our players, partners and shareholders," Mr. Ding concluded.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Second Quarter 2026 Financial Highlights
Net revenues were RMB30.1 billion (US$4.4 billion), an increase of 7.9% compared with the same quarter of 2025. Games and related value-added services net revenues were RMB25.0 billion (US$3.7 billion), an increase of 9.7% compared with the same quarter of 2025. Youdao net revenues were RMB1.5 billion (US$216.2 million), an increase of 3.5% compared with the same quarter of 2025. NetEase Cloud Music net revenues were RMB2.0 billion (US$291.4 million), which was relatively stable compared with the same quarter of 2025. Innovative businesses and others net revenues were RMB1.6 billion (US$241.6 million), a decrease of 3.5% compared with the same quarter of 2025. Gross profit was RMB21.2 billion (US$3.1 billion), an increase of 17.5% compared with the same quarter of 2025. Total operating expenses were RMB9.1 billion (US$1.3 billion), an increase of 1.5% compared with the same quarter of 2025. Net income attributable to the Company's shareholders was RMB7.0 billion (US$1.0 billion). Non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders was RMB7.7 billion (US$1.1 billion).[1] Basic net income per share was US$0.32 (US$1.61 per ADS). Non-GAAP basic net income per share was US$0.36 (US$1.78 per ADS).[1] [1] As used in this announcement, non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders and non-GAAP basic and diluted net income per share and per ADS are defined to exclude share-based compensation expenses. See the unaudited reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP results within this announcement.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Financial Highlights
Net revenues were RMB60.7 billion (US$8.9 billion), an increase of 7.0% compared with the same period of 2025. Games and related value-added services net revenues were RMB50.7 billion (US$7.5 billion), an increase of 8.3% compared with the same period of 2025. Youdao net revenues were RMB2.8 billion (US$414.9 million), an increase of 3.6% compared with the same period of 2025. NetEase Cloud Music net revenues were RMB4.0 billion (US$583.4 million), an increase of 3.4% compared with the same period of 2025. Innovative businesses and others net revenues were RMB3.2 billion (US$469.9 million), a decrease of 4.0% compared with the same period of 2025. Gross profit was RMB42.4 billion (US$6.3 billion), an increase of 16.2% compared with the same period of 2025. Total operating expenses were RMB17.7 billion (US$2.6 billion), an increase of 3.9% compared with the same period of 2025. Net income attributable to the Company's shareholders was RMB17.7 billion (US$2.6 billion). Non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders was RMB19.0 billion (US$2.8 billion). [1] Basic net income per share was US$0.81 (US$4.06 per ADS). Non-GAAP basic net income per share was US$0.88 (US$4.38 per ADS).[1] [1] As used in this announcement, non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders and non-GAAP basic and diluted net income per share and per ADS are defined to exclude share-based compensation expenses. See the unaudited reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP results within this announcement.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We continue to drive innovation across both newly launched and established titles, while further advancing our pipeline of titles in development.
Below are some recent highlights from our key products and services:
Games and related value-added services
The Fantasy Westward Journey franchise, Identity V, Eggy Party, Sword of Justice and Where Winds Meet sustained solid momentum through ongoing content updates, gameplay innovation and vibrant community activities.
We also advanced our global strategy and enhanced player engagement through strong live operations. For example, Where Winds Meet and Marvel Rivals further broadened their international reach with a steady stream of fresh content and community-focused initiatives in various markets including North America and Europe.
With respect to our pipeline of new titles, Sea of Remnants launched in China in July 2026, while development of Ananta and Blood Message remained on track, strengthening our innovative pipeline across diverse genres, gameplay and markets.
Youdao
Youdao advanced its AI-native strategy and deepened AI-driven innovation across its ecosystem. In the second quarter, it launched the large language model, Confucius 4, which delivers leading mathematical reasoning capabilities at lower inference costs compared to its previous version. Youdao also advanced its AI agent capabilities toward the autonomous execution of complex work and learning tasks.
NetEase Cloud Music
NetEase Cloud Music further developed its music-centric ecosystem by nurturing its distinctive community and enriching its differentiated content offering with original music, thereby driving stronger community engagement. It also further improved music-oriented monetization through continued growth in subscription-based memberships.
Innovative businesses and others
Innovative businesses and others remained focused on sustainable development and efficient operations, with Yanxuan maintaining leading positions on major e-commerce platforms in China across its key categories, including pet food, home scents and home goods.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
Net Revenues
Net revenues for the second quarter of 2026 were RMB30.1 billion (US$4.4 billion), compared with RMB30.6 billion and RMB27.9 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Net revenues from games and related value-added services were RMB25.0 billion (US$3.7 billion) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB25.7 billion and RMB22.8 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. Net revenues from the operation of online games accounted for approximately 97.7% of the segment's net revenues for the second quarter of 2026, compared with 97.5% and 97.1% for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter decrease was mainly due to a slight decline in net revenues from certain self-developed and licensed games. The year-over-year increase was attributable to higher net revenues from self-developed games, such as the Fantasy Westward Journey franchise and Where Winds Meet.
Net revenues from Youdao were RMB1.5 billion (US$216.2 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB1.3 billion and RMB1.4 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year increases were mainly attributable to higher net revenues from its learning services.
Net revenues from NetEase Cloud Music were RMB2.0 billion (US$291.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, remaining stable compared with the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025.
Net revenues from innovative businesses and others were RMB1.6 billion (US$241.6 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB1.5 billion and RMB1.7 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter increase was mainly attributable to higher net revenues from e-commerce business and several other businesses included within the segment. The year-over-year decrease was mainly due to decreased net revenues from the e-commerce business.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues for the second quarter of 2026 was RMB8.9 billion (US$1.3 billion), compared with RMB9.4 billion and RMB9.8 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter decrease was mainly due to lower revenue-sharing costs. The year-over-year decrease was mainly due to lower revenue-sharing and product costs.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the second quarter of 2026 was RMB21.2 billion (US$3.1 billion), compared with RMB21.2 billion and RMB18.1 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the second quarter of 2026 were RMB9.1 billion (US$1.3 billion), compared with RMB8.6 billion and RMB9.0 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The quarter-over-quarter increase was primarily due to increased marketing expenditures, staff-related costs and research and development expenditures. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to increased research and development expenditures.
Other Income/(Expenses)
Other income/(expenses) consisted of net investment income/(loss), interest income, net exchange gains/(losses) and others. The quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year fluctuations in other income/(expenses) were mainly due to a decline in the fair value of equity security investments and impairment provisions made during the second quarter of 2026.
Income Tax
The Group recorded a net income tax charge of RMB2.5 billion (US$362.4 million) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB2.5 billion and RMB1.6 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2026 was 25.5%, compared with 18.9% and 14.7% for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively. The effective tax rate represents certain estimates by the Group as to the tax obligations and benefits applicable to it in each quarter.
Net Income and Non-GAAP Net Income
Net income attributable to the Company's shareholders totaled RMB7.0 billion (US$1.0 billion) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB10.7 billion and RMB8.6 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Basic net income was US$0.32 per share (US$1.61 per ADS) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with US$0.49 per share (US$2.46 per ADS) and US$0.40 per share (US$1.99 per ADS) for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders totaled RMB7.7 billion (US$1.1 billion) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB11.3 billion and RMB9.5 billion for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Non-GAAP basic net income was US$0.36 per share (US$1.78 per ADS) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with US$0.52 per share (US$2.60 per ADS) and US$0.44 per share (US$2.20 per ADS) for the preceding quarter and the same quarter of 2025, respectively.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Financial Results
Net Revenues
Net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were RMB60.7 billion (US$8.9 billion), compared with RMB56.7 billion for the same period of 2025.
Net revenues from games and related value-added services were RMB50.7 billion (US$7.5 billion) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB46.9 billion for the same period of 2025. Net revenues from the operation of online games accounted for approximately 97.6% of the segment's net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with approximately 97.3% for the same period of 2025. The increase was attributable to higher net revenues from self-developed games, such as the Fantasy Westward Journey franchise, Where Winds Meet and Eggy Party.
Net revenues from Youdao were RMB2.8 billion (US$414.9 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB2.7 billion for the same period of 2025. The increase was mainly attributable to higher net revenues from its learning services and online marketing services, partially offset by a decrease in net revenues from smart devices.
Net revenues from NetEase Cloud Music were RMB4.0 billion (US$583.4 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB3.8 billion for the same period of 2025. The increase was mainly attributable to higher net revenues from online music services, driven by growth in sales of membership subscriptions.
Net revenues from innovative businesses and others were RMB3.2 billion (US$469.9 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB3.3 billion for the same period of 2025. The decrease was mainly due to a decline in net revenues from the e-commerce business.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was RMB18.3 billion (US$2.7 billion), compared with RMB20.2 billion for the same period of 2025. The decrease was mainly due to lower revenue-sharing and product costs.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was RMB42.4 billion (US$6.3 billion), compared with RMB36.5 billion for the same period of 2025.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026 were RMB17.7 billion (US$2.6 billion), compared with RMB17.0 billion for the same period of 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to higher marketing and research and development expenditures for games and related value-added services.
Other Income/(Expenses)
Other income/(expenses) consisted of net investment income/(loss), interest income, net exchange gains/(losses) and others. The fluctuation in other income/(expenses) was mainly due to a decline in the fair value of equity security investments, increased net exchange losses, and impairment provisions made during the six months ended June 30, 2026.
Income Tax
The Group recorded a net income tax charge of RMB5.0 billion (US$734.3 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB3.5 billion for the same period of 2025. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was 21.7%, compared with 15.0% for the same period of 2025. The effective tax rate represents certain estimates by the Group as to the tax obligations and benefits applicable to it in each period.
Net Income and Non-GAAP Net Income
Net income attributable to the Company's shareholders totaled RMB17.7 billion (US$2.6 billion) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB18.9 billion for the same period of 2025.
Basic net income was US$0.81 per share (US$4.06 per ADS) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with US$0.88 per share (US$4.38 per ADS) for the same period of 2025.
Non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders totaled RMB19.0 billion (US$2.8 billion) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with RMB20.8 billion for the same period of 2025.
Non-GAAP basic net income was US$0.88 per share (US$4.38 per ADS) for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared with US$0.96 per share (US$4.81 per ADS) for the same period of 2025.
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
As of June 30, 2026, the Company's net cash (total cash and cash equivalents, current and non-current time deposits and restricted cash, as well as short-term investments balance, minus loans) totaled RMB167.5 billion (US$24.7 billion), compared with RMB163.5 billion as of December 31, 2025. Net cash provided by operating activities was RMB10.0 billion (US$1.5 billion) for the second quarter of 2026, compared with RMB13.7 billion and RMB10.9 billion for the preceding quarter and the second quarter of 2025, respectively.
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The United States dollar (US$) amounts disclosed in this announcement are presented solely for the convenience of the reader. The percentages stated are calculated based on RMB.
The conversion of Renminbi (RMB) into US$ is based on the noon buying rate of US$1.00 = RMB6.7851 on the last trading day of June 2026 (June 30, 2026) as set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. No representation is made that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into US$ at that rate on June 30, 2026, or at any other certain date.
CONFERENCE CALL
NetEase's management team will host a teleconference call with a simultaneous webcast at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 20, 2026 (Beijing/Hong Kong Time: 8:00 p.m., Thursday, August 20, 2026). NetEase's management will be on the call to discuss the results and answer questions.
Interested parties may participate in the conference call by dialing 1-914-202-3258 and providing conference ID: 10056362, 15 minutes prior to the initiation of the call. A replay of the call will be available by dialing 1-855-883-1031 and entering PIN: 10056362. The replay will be available through August 27, 2026.
This call will be webcast live, and the replay will be available for 12 months. Both will be available on NetEase's Investor Relations website at http://ir.netease.com/.
ABOUT NETEASE, INC.
NetEase, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTES and HKEX: 9999, "NetEase") is a leading internet and game services provider centered around premium content. With extensive offerings across its expanding gaming ecosystem, the Company develops and operates some of the most popular and longest-running mobile and PC games available in China and globally.
Powered by one of the largest in-house game R&D teams focused on mobile, PC and console, NetEase creates superior gaming experiences, inspires players, and passionately delivers value for its thriving community worldwide. By infusing play with culture, and education with technology, NetEase transforms gaming into a meaningful vehicle to build a more entertaining and enlightened world.
Beyond games, NetEase service offerings include its majority-controlled subsidiaries Youdao (NYSE: DAO), an intelligent learning and advertising solutions provider, and NetEase Cloud Music (HKEX: 9899), a well-known online music platform featuring a vibrant content community, as well as Yanxuan, NetEase's private-label consumer lifestyle brand.
For more information, please visit: http://ir.netease.com/.
Contact for Media and Investors:
Email: [email protected]
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement contains statements of a forward-looking nature. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these forward-looking statements by terminology such as "will," "expects," "anticipates," "future," "intends," "plans," "believes," "estimates" and similar expressions. In addition, statements that are not historical facts, including statements about NetEase's strategies and business plans, its expectations regarding the growth of its business and its revenue and the quotations from management in this announcement are or contain forward-looking statements. NetEase may also make forward-looking statements in its periodic reports to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), in announcements made on the website of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the "Hong Kong Stock Exchange"), in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties. The accuracy of these statements may be impacted by a number of business risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated, including risks related to: the risk that the online games market will not continue to grow or that NetEase will not be able to maintain its position in that market in China or globally; risks associated with NetEase's business and operating strategies and its ability to implement such strategies; NetEase's ability to develop and manage its operations and business; competition for, among other things, capital, technology and skilled personnel; potential changes in regulatory environment in the markets where NetEase operates, including policy or rule changes on taxation; the risk that NetEase may not be able to continuously develop new and creative online services or that NetEase will not be able to set, or follow in a timely manner, trends in the market; risks related to evolving economic cycles and geopolitical tensions, including the direct or indirect impacts of national trade, investment, protectionist, tax or other laws or policies as well as export controls and economic or trade sanctions; risks related to the expansion of NetEase's businesses and operations internationally; risks associated with cybersecurity threats or incidents; and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that could adversely affect NetEase's business and financial results. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in NetEase's filings with the SEC and announcements on the website of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. NetEase does not undertake any obligation to update this forward-looking information, except as required under applicable law.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
NetEase considers and uses non-GAAP financial measures, such as non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders and non-GAAP basic and diluted net income per ADS and per share, as supplemental metrics in reviewing and assessing its operating performance and formulating its business plan. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
NetEase defines non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders as net income attributable to the Company's shareholders excluding share-based compensation expenses. Non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders enables NetEase's management to assess its operating results without considering the impact of share-based compensation expenses. NetEase believes that this non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information to investors in understanding and evaluating the Company's current operating performance and prospects in the same manner as management does, if they so choose. NetEase also believes that the use of this non-GAAP financial measure facilitates investors' assessment of its operating performance.
Non-GAAP financial measures are not defined under U.S. GAAP and are not presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools. One of the key limitations of using non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders is that it does not reflect all items of expense/income that affect the Company's operations. Share-based compensation expenses have been and may continue to be incurred in NetEase's business and are not reflected in the presentation of non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders. In addition, the non-GAAP financial measures NetEase uses may differ from the non-GAAP measures used by other companies, including peer companies, and therefore their comparability may be limited.
NetEase compensates for these limitations by reconciling non-GAAP net income attributable to the Company's shareholders to the nearest U.S. GAAP performance measure, all of which should be considered when evaluating the Company's performance. NetEase encourages you to review its financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure.
The unaudited reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP results is set out as follows in RMB and US$ (in thousands, except per share data or per ADS data):
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Net income attributable to the
Company's shareholders
8,601,010
10,674,106
6,980,656
1,028,821
18,902,167
17,654,762
2,601,989
Add: Share-based compensation
930,921
600,718
766,058
112,903
1,866,491
1,366,776
201,438
Non-GAAP net income attributable
to the Company's shareholders
9,531,931
11,274,824
7,746,714
1,141,724
20,768,658
19,021,538
2,803,427
Non-GAAP net income per share
Basic
2.99
3.53
2.42
0.36
6.53
5.94
0.88
Diluted
2.96
3.49
2.40
0.35
6.46
5.90
0.87
Non-GAAP net income per ADS
Basic
14.95
17.63
12.09
1.78
32.64
29.72
4.38
Diluted
14.81
17.46
12.02
1.77
32.32
29.49
4.35
NETEASE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
December 31,
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
US$
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
47,167,904
22,814,542
3,362,447
Time deposits
92,639,378
101,978,645
15,029,792
Restricted cash
4,319,344
4,447,483
655,478
Accounts receivable, net
5,337,819
5,746,080
846,867
Inventories
689,183
511,896
75,444
Prepayments and other current assets, net
7,658,346
5,965,371
879,188
Short-term investments
22,803,503
50,599,638
7,457,464
Total current assets
180,615,477
192,063,655
28,306,680
Non-current assets:
Property, equipment and software, net
8,425,327
8,180,276
1,205,623
Land use rights, net
4,047,355
3,982,017
586,877
Deferred tax assets
2,831,423
2,695,809
397,313
Time deposits
2,995,000
260,000
38,319
Restricted cash
3,893
3,775
556
Long-term investments
18,462,883
21,336,343
3,144,588
Other long-term assets
4,033,702
3,686,261
543,287
Total non-current assets
40,799,583
40,144,481
5,916,563
Total assets
221,415,060
232,208,136
34,223,243
Liabilities, Redeemable noncontrolling interests and
Shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
643,164
702,263
103,501
Salary and welfare payables
4,889,708
3,764,789
554,861
Taxes payable
3,874,143
3,720,498
548,334
Short-term loans
6,384,417
12,604,170
1,857,625
Contract liabilities
20,514,540
19,297,191
2,844,054
Accrued liabilities and other payables
16,062,984
15,529,221
2,288,724
Total current liabilities
52,368,956
55,618,132
8,197,099
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred tax liabilities
2,637,258
3,727,316
549,338
Other long-term liabilities
1,304,837
1,300,994
191,742
Total non-current liabilities
3,942,095
5,028,310
741,080
Total liabilities
56,311,051
60,646,442
8,938,179
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
91,319
94,938
13,992
Shareholders' equity:
Ordinary shares
2,631
2,632
388
Additional paid-in capital
9,837,460
8,781,946
1,294,299
Treasury stock
(1,518,573)
(1,617,961)
(238,458)
Statutory reserves
2,457,371
2,457,371
362,172
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(237,770)
(1,644,123)
(242,314)
Retained earnings
149,755,000
159,110,675
23,450,011
NetEase, Inc.'s shareholders' equity
160,296,119
167,090,540
24,626,098
Noncontrolling interests
4,716,571
4,376,216
644,974
Total equity
165,012,690
171,466,756
25,271,072
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and
shareholders' equity
221,415,060
232,208,136
34,223,243
NETEASE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands except per share data or per ADS data)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Net revenues
27,891,664
30,591,281
30,106,546
4,437,156
56,720,209
60,697,827
8,945,753
Cost of revenues
(9,839,182)
(9,374,209)
(8,889,221)
(1,310,109)
(20,188,321)
(18,263,430)
(2,691,697)
Gross profit
18,052,482
21,217,072
21,217,325
3,127,047
36,531,888
42,434,397
6,254,056
Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing expenses
(3,578,174)
(3,441,485)
(3,678,809)
(542,189)
(6,273,771)
(7,120,294)
(1,049,401)
General and administrative
expenses
(1,056,578)
(636,597)
(805,268)
(118,682)
(2,012,915)
(1,441,865)
(212,505)
Research and development
expenses
(4,356,646)
(4,482,157)
(4,643,910)
(684,428)
(8,742,959)
(9,126,067)
(1,345,016)
Total operating expenses
(8,991,398)
(8,560,239)
(9,127,987)
(1,345,299)
(17,029,645)
(17,688,226)
(2,606,922)
Operating profit
9,061,084
12,656,833
12,089,338
1,781,748
19,502,243
24,746,171
3,647,134
Other income/(expenses):
Investment income/(loss), net
328,444
5,472
(2,953,671)
(435,317)
1,021,195
(2,948,199)
(434,511)
Interest income, net
953,490
890,267
863,201
127,220
2,014,376
1,753,468
258,429
Exchange gains/(losses), net
114,037
(622,108)
(436,492)
(64,331)
115,840
(1,058,600)
(156,018)
Other, net
192,167
438,978
62,858
9,264
447,482
501,836
73,961
Income before tax
10,649,222
13,369,442
9,625,234
1,418,584
23,101,136
22,994,676
3,388,995
Income tax
(1,560,757)
(2,523,838)
(2,458,674)
(362,364)
(3,465,900)
(4,982,512)
(734,331)
Net income
9,088,465
10,845,604
7,166,560
1,056,220
19,635,236
18,012,164
2,654,664
Accretion of redeemable
noncontrolling interests
(1,051)
(1,104)
(1,087)
(160)
(2,100)
(2,191)
(323)
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests
(486,404)
(170,394)
(184,817)
(27,239)
(730,969)
(355,211)
(52,352)
Net income attributable to the
Company's shareholders
8,601,010
10,674,106
6,980,656
1,028,821
18,902,167
17,654,762
2,601,989
Net income
9,088,465
10,845,604
7,166,560
1,056,220
19,635,236
18,012,164
2,654,664
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
(389,857)
(728,683)
(770,419)
(113,546)
(628,819)
(1,499,102)
(220,940)
Total comprehensive income
8,698,608
10,116,921
6,396,141
942,674
19,006,417
16,513,062
2,433,724
Comprehensive income
attributable to noncontrolling
interests
(470,857)
(121,843)
(140,619)
(20,725)
(690,158)
(262,462)
(38,682)
Comprehensive income
attributable to the
Company's shareholders
8,227,751
9,995,078
6,255,522
921,949
18,316,259
16,250,600
2,395,042
Net income per share
Basic
2.70
3.34
2.18
0.32
5.94
5.52
0.81
Diluted
2.67
3.31
2.17
0.32
5.88
5.47
0.81
Net income per ADS
Basic
13.49
16.69
10.90
1.61
29.71
27.58
4.06
Diluted
13.36
16.53
10.83
1.60
29.41
27.37
4.03
Weighted average number of
ordinary shares used in
calculating net income per
share
Basic
3,188,634
3,198,123
3,203,046
3,203,046
3,181,307
3,200,598
3,200,598
Diluted
3,214,681
3,227,325
3,221,637
3,221,637
3,210,563
3,224,495
3,224,495
NETEASE, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
March 31,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
June 30,
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
RMB
RMB
RMB
US$
RMB
RMB
US$
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
9,088,465
10,845,604
7,166,560
1,056,220
19,635,236
18,012,164
2,654,664
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
428,427
430,583
439,439
64,765
909,188
870,022
128,225
Fair value changes of equity security, other
investments and financial instruments
55,715
1,117,717
2,023,477
298,224
(502,784)
3,141,194
462,955
Impairment losses on investments
161,463
344,871
1,281,917
188,931
250,534
1,626,788
239,759
Share-based compensation cost
946,395
616,180
781,656
115,202
1,898,267
1,397,836
206,015
Allowance for expected credit losses
153,179
6,719
1,309
193
169,950
8,028
1,183
Gains on disposal of property, equipment and
software
(30,920)
(565)
(13,983)
(2,061)
(10,627)
(14,548)
(2,144)
Unrealized exchange (gains)/losses
(165,662)
643,942
487,982
71,920
(194,115)
1,131,924
166,825
(Gains)/losses on disposal of long-term investments
(141,078)
(1,071,442)
5,550
818
(129,403)
(1,065,892)
(157,093)
Deferred income taxes
(853,764)
532,257
693,742
102,245
(525,492)
1,225,999
180,690
Share of results on equity method investees
13,479
442,575
96,645
14,244
(5,189)
539,220
79,471
Fair value changes of short-term investments
(344,604)
(385,395)
(372,234)
(54,861)
(546,213)
(757,629)
(111,661)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
953,295
(1,188,837)
726,762
107,111
(135,665)
(462,075)
(68,101)
Inventories
(73,944)
143,099
34,048
5,018
(20,171)
177,147
26,108
Prepayments and other assets
583,484
116,152
(16,816)
(2,478)
288,306
99,336
14,640
Accounts payable
119,644
134,445
(105,340)
(15,525)
(28,432)
29,105
4,290
Salary and welfare payables
920,662
(2,253,559)
1,107,729
163,259
(1,164,449)
(1,145,830)
(168,874)
Taxes payable
(764,372)
1,895,324
(2,038,642)
(300,459)
1,031,751
(143,318)
(21,122)
Contract liabilities
(718,719)
1,384,445
(2,511,144)
(370,097)
1,807,479
(1,126,699)
(166,055)
Accrued liabilities and other payables
530,718
(21,044)
184,272
27,158
240,344
163,228
24,057
Net cash provided by operating activities
10,861,863
13,733,071
9,972,929
1,469,827
22,968,515
23,706,000
3,493,832
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, equipment and software
(189,842)
(312,148)
(18,785)
(2,769)
(643,913)
(330,933)
(48,774)
Proceeds from sale of property, equipment and
software
21,499
1,673
14,539
2,143
22,835
16,212
2,389
Purchase of intangible assets, content and licensed
copyrights
(313,349)
(290,019)
(61,554)
(9,072)
(612,120)
(351,573)
(51,815)
Net changes of short-term investments with terms of
three months or less
776,428
(15,766,308)
(1,594,496)
(235,000)
(5,362,128)
(17,360,804)
(2,558,666)
Purchase of short-term investments with terms over
three months and debt securities
(5,800,000)
(5,885,000)
(12,851,707)
(1,894,107)
(8,770,000)
(18,736,707)
(2,761,449)
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments
with terms over three months
5,745,454
4,861,483
3,515,814
518,167
8,454,055
8,377,297
1,234,661
Investment in equity method investees
(100,986)
(94,021)
(3,040,753)
(448,152)
(155,089)
(3,134,774)
(462,009)
Investment in other equity investments
(2,640,655)
(3,110,374)
(453,871)
(66,892)
(2,677,518)
(3,564,245)
(525,304)
Proceeds from disposal of long-term investments
784,855
1,353,947
50,733
7,477
862,283
1,404,680
207,024
Placement/rollover of matured time deposits
(27,980,605)
(30,608,133)
(50,216,128)
(7,400,941)
(77,582,412)
(80,824,261)
(11,912,022)
Proceeds from maturities of time deposits
33,617,510
42,018,869
30,056,765
4,429,819
77,543,992
72,075,634
10,622,634
Change in other long-term assets
(27,367)
65,909
(58,891)
(8,679)
(28,045)
7,018
1,034
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities
3,892,942
(7,764,122)
(34,658,334)
(5,108,006)
(8,948,060)
(42,422,456)
(6,252,297)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net changes from loans with terms of three months or
less
2,017,570
1,182,383
420,940
62,039
(236,845)
1,603,323
236,300
Proceeds of loans with terms over three months
1,231,000
6,134,520
1,326,090
195,441
3,978,550
7,460,610
1,099,558
Payment of loans with terms over three months
(1,804,730)
(2,620,900)
—
—
(4,740,407)
(2,620,900)
(386,273)
Dividends paid to shareholders
(3,082,122)
(5,156,320)
(3,138,873)
(462,613)
(8,666,654)
(8,295,193)
(1,222,560)
Net amounts received/(paid) related to capital
contribution from or repurchase of noncontrolling
interests shareholders
42,400
(23,418)
4,874
718
84,917
(18,544)
(2,733)
Net amounts paid related to repurchase of NetEase's
ADSs/purchase of subsidiaries' shares
(355,563)
(1,314,003)
(1,795,596)
(264,638)
(659,164)
(3,109,599)
(458,298)
Net cash used in financing activities
(1,951,445)
(1,797,738)
(3,182,565)
(469,053)
(10,239,603)
(4,980,303)
(734,006)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash held in foreign
currencies
(31,749)
(340,829)
(187,753)
(27,671)
(88,681)
(528,582)
(77,903)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash
12,771,611
3,830,382
(28,055,723)
(4,134,903)
3,692,171
(24,225,341)
(3,570,374)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at the
beginning of the period
45,395,483
51,491,141
55,321,523
8,153,384
54,474,923
51,491,141
7,588,855
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end of
the period
58,167,094
55,321,523
27,265,800
4,018,481
58,167,094
27,265,800
4,018,481
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes, net
2,184,556
1,464,650
2,487,225
366,572
3,391,111
3,951,875
582,434
Cash paid for interest expenses
64,366
78,326
25,374
3,740
161,790
103,700
15,283
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and
financing activities:
Fixed asset purchases financed by accounts payable
and accrued liabilities
Po exploitu Kelp DAO za 292 milionů dolarů oznámené migrace z LayerZero do Chainlink CCIP dosáhly zhruba 15 miliard dolarů. Největší odchod je BitGo s 7,4 miliardy dolarů v WBTC.
The Kelp DAO bridge exploit did not just steal $292 million. It triggered the largest infrastructure migration in DeFi history, and the math shows LayerZero may never recover the lost ground.
Summary
Publicly announced migrations from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP have reached approximately $15 billion in total value, led by BitGo moving $7.4 billion in WBTC, Mantle shifting its $2.5 billion Super Portal, and Lombard transferring over $1 billion in bitcoin-backed assets. The April 18, 2026 Kelp DAO bridge exploit drained 116,500 rsETH worth $292 million through a forged cross-chain message that exploited a single-verifier configuration, with the attack later attributed to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. LayerZero’s Decentralized Verifier Network model allows applications to select as few as one verifier to validate cross-chain messages, while Chainlink CCIP requires a minimum of 16 independent node operators per lane plus a separate Risk Management Network. Wyoming’s Stable Token Commission became the first U.S. public entity to abandon LayerZero, selecting Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive multi-year infrastructure for the Frontier Stable Token on August 18, 2026. LayerZero’s ZRO token has fallen to a market capitalization of roughly $302 million, down from an all-time high near $7.47, as Nethermind became the latest infrastructure provider to exit its verifier role and join Chainlink as a node operator. On April 18, 2026, an attacker forged a cross-chain message on a LayerZero-powered bridge and walked away with 116,500 rsETH. The tokens were worth $292 million. Within hours, the stolen assets had been deposited on Aave as collateral to borrow $190 million in WETH, spreading stress across lending markets and freezing rsETH pools on both Aave V3 and V4. It was the largest DeFi exploit of the year. But the money was only the beginning of what LayerZero lost.
Four months later, the damage ledger reads differently. BitGo, the custodian behind the largest bitcoin-backed token in decentralized finance, has moved $7.4 billion in WBTC to Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol. Kraken, Mantle, Lombard, Solv Protocol, Virtuals, Re, and the state of Wyoming have followed. The cumulative value of announced migrations now approaches $15 billion. Nethermind, one of LayerZero’s own verifier network operators, has ended its role and joined Chainlink as a node operator. The question is no longer whether cross-chain infrastructure is becoming a winner-take-all market. The question is whether LayerZero can stop the bleeding.
The exploit that broke trust The Kelp DAO attack was not a smart contract hack. It was a sophisticated assault on off-chain infrastructure that began six weeks before the theft, when an attacker socially engineered a LayerZero Labs developer on March 6, 2026, harvesting session keys and pivoting into LayerZero’s RPC cloud environment. From that position, the attacker poisoned internal RPC nodes and launched a DDoS attack against external nodes, feeding false data to a single verifier that was the only checkpoint standing between the attacker and $292 million.
The critical vulnerability was a configuration choice. Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge ran with a 1-of-1 DVN setup, meaning a single Decentralized Verifier Network node operated by LayerZero Labs was the sole validator of cross-chain messages. No second verifier existed to disagree. When the attacker compromised the data feeding that lone verifier, the Ethereum contract released funds based on a token burn that never happened on the source chain.
BREAKING: Curve Finance halts LayerZero infrastructure out of precaution after rsETH LayerZero hack, affecting CRV bridging on multiple chains and crvUSD fast bridge pic.twitter.com/UwNvfxBew9
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) April 19, 2026 Mandiant, CrowdStrike, and independent security researchers all attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, specifically the TraderTraitor cluster. The attackers routed approximately $175 million in ETH through privacy rails, while Arbitrum managed to lock $71 million in ETH linked to the exploit.
The damage did not stop at Kelp DAO. The attacker deposited 89,567 rsETH on Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed $190 million in WETH against assets that were now backed by nothing. Aave was forced to freeze rsETH markets on both V3 and V4 to prevent further contagion. The liquidation of the attacker’s positions took weeks, with Aave completing the final rsETH liquidations only after the token’s price had been severely disrupted. DeFi United launched a recovery plan for affected holders, but the full scope of secondary losses across lending markets, liquidity pools, and derivative positions linked to rsETH has never been comprehensively tallied.
What followed was a blame war. LayerZero initially pointed to Kelp DAO for choosing the risky 1-of-1 configuration. Kelp DAO fired back that the single-verifier setup was LayerZero’s own default. For three weeks, LayerZero prioritized a technical post-mortem over clear communication, an approach its own leadership later admitted fell short. On May 9, LayerZero publicly acknowledged it “made a mistake” by allowing its own verifier network to secure high-value assets in a risky configuration.
By then, the exodus had already begun.
The migration ledger The departures did not arrive as a wave. They arrived as a cascade, each one making the next more likely.
Kelp DAO itself moved first, shifting rsETH to Chainlink CCIP while the dispute with LayerZero was still active. Solv Protocol followed in early May, moving more than $700 million in tokenized bitcoin infrastructure. Kraken announced on May 14 that Chainlink CCIP would become the exclusive bridge infrastructure for kBTC and all future wrapped assets. The next day, Lombard migrated over $1 billion in bitcoin-backed assets, including LBTC and BTC.b.
By mid-May, the total had crossed $4 billion. Then it accelerated.
Virtuals Protocol migrated $700 million in VIRTUAL tokens to enable cross-chain payments for AI agents. Re selected Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive bridge for reUSD, backed by $475 million in protocol TVL. Yuzu Money transferred $54.5 million. On July 9, Mantle announced the migration of its Super Portal, co-developed with Bybit, covering $2.5 billion in MNT tokens. The portal was temporarily suspended during the migration window of July 9 to 15.
Then came the largest single departure. On August 4, BitGo announced it would move WBTC, the biggest bitcoin-backed token in DeFi, from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP. The migration covers $7.4 billion in assets and makes Chainlink CCIP the default infrastructure for all future assets BitGo issues. That single announcement nearly doubled the cumulative migration total.
On August 18, Wyoming’s Stable Token Commission finalized its migration, making the Frontier Stable Token the first state-issued stablecoin in the United States to run exclusively on Chainlink CCIP under a multi-year contract. Wyoming cited concerns about LayerZero’s “disclosure practices and operational security.”
The running tally now approaches $15 billion across at least ten named protocols and one sovereign state entity.
The architecture gap that made it possible The exodus is not simply about one exploit. It reflects a structural difference in how LayerZero and Chainlink CCIP approach cross-chain security, and the Kelp DAO hack made that difference impossible to ignore.
LayerZero V2 uses a modular architecture centered on Ultra Light Nodes and configurable Decentralized Verifier Networks. Each application chooses its own set of DVNs and specifies a threshold for how many must agree before a cross-chain message is validated. The design is flexible. It is also, as the Kelp exploit proved, flexible enough to be fatal. A 1-of-1 setup is cheap but means a single compromised verifier can authorize fraudulent transactions. Costs scale with the number of required verifiers, creating a direct tradeoff between security and expense.
Chainlink CCIP takes a different approach. Every cross-chain lane is secured by a minimum of 16 independent, Chainlink-operated node operators. A separate Risk Management Network monitors for anomalous activity and enforces value-based rate limits on each lane, acting as a circuit breaker that caps potential losses even if the primary validation layer is compromised. The system is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant and ISO 27001 certified.
The practical difference is who bears the security burden. Under LayerZero’s model, each application team must understand verifier economics, select trustworthy DVNs, and set thresholds that balance cost against risk. Under CCIP, the baseline security is embedded in the protocol itself. As BitGo’s announcement made clear, the new setup lets the issuer retain direct control over token contracts, transfer limits, and cross-chain settings without needing to manage a verifier stack.
LayerZero has responded by removing support for 1-of-1 DVN configurations and announcing plans to move most routes toward stricter 5-of-5 verifier setups. Whether that is enough to reverse the migration trend is an open question. The 5-of-5 model increases costs for applications and still leaves the selection of verifiers in the hands of each deployer, a responsibility many teams have now decided they would prefer not to carry.
The math on LayerZero’s revenue loss This is the arithmetic nobody has published, and it tells a story more damaging than any headline.
LayerZero currently takes a 0% protocol fee on cross-chain messaging. All messaging fees flow to the DVNs and Executors that secure and deliver messages. Revenue for the broader LayerZero ecosystem comes from three potential lines: messaging fees if the fee switch is activated, Stargate swap fees, and fees from the Zero L1. ZRO buybacks are funded by a Stargate ecosystem allocation routed to the LayerZero Foundation.
The fee switch has not been activated. The LayerZero Foundation runs an immutable voting contract that enforces a public on-chain referendum every six months, and token holders have not yet voted to turn it on.
Here is what the math looks like. LayerZero accounts for an estimated 57% of all cross-chain volume, with over $100 billion in cumulative value transferred across its rails. The Chainlink CCIP migration wave represents roughly $15 billion in bridge TVL that has either migrated or is in the process of migrating. That is not transaction volume. That is the base layer of assets that generate recurring cross-chain messaging fees every time they move between chains.
Consider the arithmetic protocol by protocol. BitGo’s $7.4 billion in WBTC is the single largest wrapped asset in DeFi. Every time WBTC moves between Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, or any other supported chain, it generates a cross-chain message. Under LayerZero, that message produced fees for DVN operators and Executors. Under Chainlink CCIP, those same fees flow to Chainlink node operators. Mantle’s $2.5 billion in MNT tokens bridges regularly between Mantle L2 and Ethereum mainnet. Lombard’s $1 billion in LBTC and BTC.b moves between Corn, Berachain, Rootstock, and other networks. Solv’s $700 million in SolvBTC bridges across four chains. Virtuals’ $700 million in VIRTUAL tokens crosses between Base and other networks to power AI agent payments.
Add Kelp DAO’s rsETH, Re’s $475 million reUSD, Kraken’s $330 million in kBTC and future wrapped assets, and Yuzu Money’s $54.5 million. The aggregate is not a static number. It is a flow generator. Each dollar of bridge TVL produces messaging revenue proportional to how frequently it moves between chains. Wrapped bitcoin products, which rebalance and settle constantly, are among the highest-frequency bridge users in DeFi.
The lost fee revenue accrues not to LayerZero today, since the fee switch is off, but to the future value of ever activating it. Every migration shrinks the denominator of what a fee switch would be worth. Every departure makes it harder to argue that ZRO holders should vote to activate fees, because the remaining transaction base may not justify the cost to users.
ZRO’s market capitalization has fallen to roughly $302 million, down from an all-time high near $7.47 per token. The top 100 wallets control 87.39% of supply. A June 2026 unlock released 25.71 million ZRO worth approximately $23 million, adding sell pressure to an already declining token. The price has dropped 38.87% in the past month alone.
The uncomfortable conclusion: LayerZero’s revenue potential is being hollowed out before the revenue engine is even switched on. The migrations are not just a loss of current activity. They are a structural reduction in the protocol’s future earning capacity.
When verifiers walk The Nethermind departure on August 19 adds a dimension that goes beyond TVL. Nethermind is not a token project moving its assets to a different bridge. It is an Ethereum core engineering firm that was operating a DVN node for LayerZero, validating cross-chain messages as part of the security infrastructure itself.
Nethermind ended its LayerZero verifier role after what it described as an “extensive infrastructure review” and joined Chainlink as a node operator and strategic technology provider. The company did not publish the review or identify a specific LayerZero flaw. It did not disclose the migration’s cost or timeline. What it did do was move from being part of LayerZero’s security layer to being part of Chainlink’s.
JUST IN: S&P Global’s stablecoin stability assessments (SSAs) are now available onchain through Chainlink DataLink, bringing $1.2T+ in indexed assets to DeFi pic.twitter.com/tl1hxOcqXn
— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) April 11, 2026 The significance is structural. LayerZero’s security model depends on a diverse, high-quality set of DVN operators. When one of those operators not only leaves but joins the competing protocol, it signals something about the relative attractiveness of operating infrastructure for each network. If the Nethermind departure prompts other DVN operators to reassess their positions, LayerZero faces a potential reinforcing loop: fewer high-quality verifiers make the network less attractive to applications, which reduces fee revenue for remaining verifiers, which makes the network less attractive to verifiers.
LayerZero’s move toward 5-of-5 verifier requirements could intensify this dynamic. More required verifiers means more operators must be recruited and retained per lane, at a time when at least one prominent operator has concluded the opportunity lies elsewhere.
A state government takes a side Wyoming’s decision deserves its own examination because it represents something new in the cross-chain debate: a sovereign entity making an infrastructure choice based on operational security rather than token economics.
The Frontier Stable Token launched in January 2026 as the first fiat-backed, fully reserved stable token issued by a U.S. public entity, backed by U.S. dollars and short-term Treasuries. The Commission supports FRNT across eight networks: Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Hedera, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana.
The original cross-chain infrastructure was LayerZero. The migration to Chainlink CCIP, finalized on August 18, was driven by what the Commission called concerns about LayerZero’s “disclosure practices and operational security.” The contract is exclusive and multi-year. LayerZero has been fully deprecated. The Commission said it conducted a full assessment of its cross-chain provider and concluded that the operational security standards did not meet the requirements of a public financial instrument.
FRNT is not a large-cap token. Its significance lies in what it represents: a government-issued financial instrument choosing one cross-chain protocol over another on the basis of security review, not developer preference or token incentives. The Commission’s eight-network deployment across Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Hedera, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana means Chainlink CCIP now secures a sovereign stablecoin across a wider network footprint than most private-sector tokens manage.
This matters because government adoption of cross-chain infrastructure creates a different kind of lock-in than protocol adoption. When BitGo migrates, it can theoretically migrate again. When a state government signs a multi-year exclusive contract, it creates a precedent that other public entities may follow. If federal stablecoin legislation advances and other states issue their own stable tokens, the Wyoming precedent positions Chainlink CCIP as the default choice for government-grade cross-chain infrastructure.
The LINK token rose approximately 3% to trade near $9.67 on the announcement. The market read it as confirmation of a trend rather than a one-off event.
Winner-take-all dynamics in cross-chain infrastructure Cross-chain messaging has network effects that tilt toward consolidation. The more assets and protocols that use a given infrastructure, the more liquidity flows through its lanes, the more node operators are incentivized to secure it, and the more attractive it becomes to the next migrating protocol. The reverse also holds: as assets leave a network, remaining participants bear a proportionally larger share of security costs while enjoying fewer network benefits.
LayerZero’s position entering 2026 was dominant. It accounted for an estimated 57% of all cross-chain volume, peaking at 76% in Q2 2025. Over $100 billion in cumulative value had crossed its rails. The Kelp DAO exploit did not break LayerZero’s code. It broke the market’s confidence in LayerZero’s security model, specifically the principle that applications should be responsible for configuring their own verification thresholds.
Chainlink’s response has been to offer a model where security is not optional and not configurable downward. Sixteen node operators per lane, a separate monitoring network, rate limits, SOC 2 compliance. It is more expensive per message. It is also the model that $15 billion in assets have now chosen.
The question for the second half of 2026 is whether this becomes self-reinforcing. If LayerZero’s 5-of-5 verifier mandate increases costs to levels comparable with CCIP, applications face a choice between two similarly priced systems, one of which has been accumulating institutional migration momentum for four months. If the fee switch referendum fails because the remaining transaction base no longer justifies activation, ZRO’s value proposition weakens further, potentially driving additional departures.
There is also the matter of developer mindshare. LayerZero’s OFT standard embeds protocol-specific code into token contracts, creating what critics call vendor lock-in. Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Token standard, by contrast, is designed to let issuers retain full ownership of their token contracts and swap providers without redeploying. For teams that have already experienced one forced migration, the standard that makes the next migration easier holds obvious appeal.
Cross-chain infrastructure may not be a natural monopoly. But the $15 billion exodus suggests it has strong winner-take-most characteristics, and the current trajectory favors the protocol that made security non-negotiable.
What to watch LayerZero’s next fee switch referendum. If token holders vote against activation because the remaining transaction base cannot justify the cost to users, it will confirm the revenue hollowing thesis and likely accelerate departures.
DVN operator retention. Whether additional verifier network operators follow Nethermind to Chainlink will signal whether LayerZero’s 5-of-5 mandate can attract enough high-quality validators to function as designed.
Federal stablecoin legislation and state token adoption. If other U.S. states issue stable tokens and follow Wyoming’s precedent of selecting Chainlink CCIP, cross-chain infrastructure becomes a regulated-market standard rather than a protocol-level choice.
Kelp DAO recovery fund outcomes. Aave has completed liquidation of the attacker’s final rsETH positions, but DeFi United’s recovery plan for affected holders will test whether the ecosystem can absorb a $292 million loss without lasting contagion.
LayerZero monthly active transaction volume. The raw number of cross-chain messages processed per month, compared with pre-exodus baselines, will be the clearest measure of whether the migration wave has stabilized or is still accelerating.
Is LayerZero still safe to use after the Kelp DAO exploit? LayerZero has removed support for 1-of-1 DVN configurations and is moving toward stricter 5-of-5 verifier setups. The protocol’s code was not broken in the exploit. The vulnerability was a configuration choice that allowed a single verifier to validate high-value transactions. Applications using multiple independent verifiers face a meaningfully different risk profile than Kelp DAO’s original setup.
How much total value has migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP? Publicly announced migrations total approximately $15 billion as of mid-August 2026. The largest single migration is BitGo’s $7.4 billion WBTC, followed by Mantle’s $2.5 billion Super Portal and Lombard’s $1 billion in bitcoin-backed assets. Smaller migrations from Solv, Virtuals, Re, Kraken, and Yuzu Money account for the remainder.
What is the difference between LayerZero’s DVN model and Chainlink CCIP’s security? LayerZero allows each application to choose its own set of Decentralized Verifier Network operators and set a threshold for how many must agree. Chainlink CCIP requires a minimum of 16 independent node operators per lane and adds a separate Risk Management Network that monitors for anomalies and enforces rate limits. The core difference is whether security configuration is the responsibility of the application or the protocol.
Who was behind the Kelp DAO exploit? Mandiant, CrowdStrike, and independent security researchers attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, specifically the TraderTraitor cluster. The breach began on March 6, 2026, when an attacker socially engineered a LayerZero Labs developer to harvest session keys and gain access to the RPC cloud environment.
Why did Wyoming choose Chainlink CCIP for the Frontier Stable Token? The Wyoming Stable Token Commission cited concerns about LayerZero’s disclosure practices and operational security. The Commission selected Chainlink CCIP as the exclusive, multi-year cross-chain infrastructure for FRNT, fully retiring LayerZero. FRNT is the first fiat-backed stable token issued by a U.S. public entity.
What happens to LayerZero’s revenue if migrations continue? LayerZero currently takes 0% on messaging fees, with all fees flowing to DVNs and Executors. Revenue potential depends on activating a fee switch through a token holder referendum. Each migration reduces the transaction base that would generate fees if the switch is activated, structurally reducing the future value of ZRO.
Has LayerZero lost its dominant market share in cross-chain messaging? LayerZero accounted for an estimated 57% of all cross-chain volume entering 2026, peaking at 76% in Q2 2025. The $15 billion in migrations represents a significant reduction in the asset base generating cross-chain messages through LayerZero, though exact market share figures for mid-2026 have not been published.
Could the migration trend reverse? LayerZero’s move to 5-of-5 verifier requirements and the deprecation of insecure configurations address the specific vulnerability exploited in the Kelp DAO attack. However, reversing the trend would require migrated protocols to switch back, which involves smart contract upgrades, governance votes, and reputational risk for teams that publicly cited security as their reason for leaving. Multi-year exclusive contracts, like Wyoming’s, make reversal structurally impossible for some participants. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Crypto assets are volatile and carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Published Aug. 20, 2026.
JCB, Digital Garage a Lawson ve čtvrtek 20. srpna otestují platby USDC v pobočce Lawson Gate City Osaki Atrium v Tokiu. Zkouška má prověřit praktičnost stablecoinových plateb v maloobchodu.
Stablecoin Payments Enter the Convenience StoreThree Japanese corporate heavyweights are bringing stablecoin payments to the checkout counter. JCB (@JCB_CARD), Digital Garage (@DigitalGarage) and Lawson (@lawsonbank_jp) have signed a basic agreement to conduct a proof of concept (PoC) for in-store payments using USDC, the US dollar-pegged stablecoin. The test is scheduled for Thursday, August 20, at the Gate City Osaki Atrium branch of Lawson in Tokyo.
The mechanics are straightforward. Participants use the Consumer-Presented Mode (CPM) method, in which a barcode containing stablecoin wallet address information displayed on a user's smartphone is scanned by Lawson's in-store POS terminal. The trial runs on base:0x833589fcd6edb6e08f4c7c32d4f71b54bda02913 on @base, using Coinbase's Base app as the supported wallet.
JCB provides the payment web screen and barcode generation and settles merchant proceeds in fiat currency. Digital Garage supplies the payment API and backend system. Lawson contributes the store environment and connects its point-of-sale system using code-payment processing technology from Canal Payment Services.
Participation is restricted to personnel from the three companies. The initiative is primarily targeting inbound visitors to Japan , making it relevant to the country's growing tourism economy. The PoC aims to assess the practicality and convenience of stablecoin payments, potentially reducing currency exchange burdens and enhancing cash flow for merchants.
Part of a Broader Push in JapanThursday's test does not come out of nowhere. This initiative follows a January 2026 collaboration between JCB, Digital Garage and Resona Holdings aimed at the social implementation of stablecoin payments in Japan. That earlier pilot ran at a Tokyo venue in late February 2026 and helped lay the groundwork for today's retail-focused experiment.
Japan created the legal foundation for such projects in 2023 by updating its Payment Services Act, allowing banks, trust companies and licensed money transfer firms to issue fiat-backed stablecoins. The companies said the experiment will evaluate payment-flow feasibility, POS integration requirements, impact on checkout operations, time to completion and usability of the customer-facing web system.
Japan's convenience store sector, which serves tens of millions of customers daily, represents a significant proving ground for digital payment innovation. A successful PoC could pave the way for broader stablecoin adoption at physical retail locations across the country.
Sources:
JCN Newswire: JCB, in Collaboration with Digital Garage, to Conduct a PoC for Stablecoin-Based Payments at a Lawson Store
Japan Industry News: JCB and Partners Test Stablecoin Payments in Japan's Lawson Stores
Digital Garage Official Release: Stablecoin Payments Pilot Program
Coinbase has announced that users in Brazil can now buy and sell USDC directly against the Brazilian real on Coinbase Advanced. In its Aug. 19 announcement, the company said the change removes a step in the trading flow and reduces BRL USDC onramping costs by 85%.
The rollout concerns direct BRL-to-USDC access on Coinbase Advanced. Coinbase presented the launch as part of its expansion in Brazil, which it described as a significant crypto market.
What is changing Rather than requiring an intermediate trade or conversion route, eligible users can trade USDC directly in BRL on the Advanced platform. The company said the design is intended to lower friction and costs for users seeking dollar-denominated stablecoin liquidity.
Coinbase’s 85% figure is its own claim about the reduction in USDC onramping costs via BRL on Coinbase Advanced. The release does not provide a universal fee schedule in the announcement, so actual costs can depend on the applicable account, product and transaction conditions.
Stablecoin context The company linked the product change to its broader view of stablecoins as payment and settlement infrastructure. Those wider market statements are Coinbase’s characterization, not independently verified transaction results from this launch.
The announcement is a product-access update, not a change to the USDC protocol or a new stablecoin issuance. Users should consult Coinbase’s in-product disclosures and regional terms for availability and applicable charges. The company did not announce a change to USDC redemption mechanics in the post.
AUTHOR
Jide Idowu is a skilled freelance writer with expertise in blockchain technology, cryptocurrency, and digital finance. Known for his ability to break down complex topics into clear, engaging content, Jide crafts articles, blog posts, and analyses that resonate with both beginners and seasoned professionals. His work spans a wide range of subjects, from emerging crypto trends to in-depth explorations of blockchain innovations. With a keen eye for detail and a passion for educating readers, Jide is a reliable voice in the rapidly evolving world of digital assets.
Circle Mint nyní podporuje přímé nástupní a výstupní brány pro USDC v osmi měnách, včetně USD, EUR, BRL, GBP, hongkongského dolaru, mexického pesa, offshore čínského jüanu a singapurského dolaru. Směna probíhá přímo v rámci Mint bez samostatné konverze.
Circle has expanded Circle Mint to support direct local-currency USDC on- and off-ramps across eight currencies. The company said in an Aug. 18 post that foreign exchange is handled inside Mint, removing the need for a separate conversion step or pre-funding additional accounts.
Alongside USD and EUR, Circle listed the Brazilian real, British pound, Hong Kong dollar, Mexican peso, offshore Chinese yuan and Singapore dollar among the local currencies supported for eligible Mint account holders.
How the proposed flow works Circle says customers can activate cross-currency exchange, link a bank account for the local-currency side and register that account for the currency they intend to trade. The company describes each transaction as a quote, trade and settlement process, with USDC arriving in the Mint balance after conversion.
Circle says settlement uses local payment rails nearly around the clock where supported. Availability remains subject to jurisdiction and account eligibility, and the company notes that some account-registration steps are handled offline.
Not a retail bank account The update is directed at businesses and eligible Mint customers, including payment providers, financial institutions and fintechs. Circle states that Circle Mint is not a bank account and that funds are not protected by FDIC, SIPC or comparable government insurance.
The announcement is a Circle product update. It does not mean all currencies, regions or users have identical access, so institutions need to check Mint eligibility and local requirements before relying on the new routes.
AUTHOR
Simeon is a detail-driven editor who sharpens every piece with clarity and precision, ensuring clean, consistent, and professional content throughout.
Lucid oznámil Munsterhuis Autobedrijven jako svého prvního maloobchodního partnera v Nizozemsku. Partnerství rozšíří prodej i servis Lucid Air a Lucid Gravity.
The partnership expands Lucid's footprint, complementing the existing Lucid Studio and Service Center in Hilversum and broadening customer access across the country. Munsterhuis is one of the Netherlands' most established automotive groups, serving customers for more than six decades through a comprehensive portfolio of vehicle sales, servicing, leasing, and insurance. , /PRNewswire/ -- Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID), maker of the world's most advanced software-defined vehicles and technologies, today announced Munsterhuis Autobedrijven (Munsterhuis) as its first retail partner in the Netherlands.
Lucid and Munsterhuis Autobedrijven partner to expand Lucid's footprint and expand customer access in the Netherlands. The partnership combines Lucid's award-winning electric vehicles with Munsterhuis' automotive retail and customer service expertise to make the Lucid Air1 sedan and the Lucid Gravity2 SUV even more accessible for Dutch customers. Munsterhuis will operate a dedicated Lucid sales location in Hengelo, complemented by authorized Lucid aftersales and service operations at the same site. Together, Lucid and Munsterhuis will offer award-winning vehicles, personalized customer support, and comprehensive service coverage across the market.
Munsterhuis is one of the Netherlands' most established automotive groups, serving customers for more than six decades through a comprehensive portfolio of vehicle sales, servicing, leasing, and insurance. The family-owned company has built a strong reputation for customer care and operational excellence across the Twente region and beyond.
"Our partnership with Munsterhuis represents yet another milestone for Lucid's European expansion," said Lawrence Hamilton, President of Europe at Lucid. "The Netherlands is a key market with a strong appetite for innovative and sustainable mobility. Munsterhuis' longstanding reputation makes them an ideal partner to introduce more Dutch customers to the Lucid brand and our award-winning lineup."
"The arrival of Lucid represents an exciting new chapter for Munsterhuis," said Jochen Munsterhuis, Director at Munsterhuis. "We continuously strive to offer our customers the most innovative and forward-looking mobility solutions. Lucid's industry-leading technology, outstanding efficiency, and uncompromising approach to luxury make the brand a perfect addition to our portfolio. We are proud to have Lucid with us and look forward to welcoming our first Lucid customers."
This partnership continues Lucid's hybrid retail strategy in Europe, building on the announcement earlier this year with German retailer Wackenhut.
For more details about Lucid Motors and its products, visit the official Lucid website: https://lucidmotors.com/
For more details about Munsterhuis, visit the official website: munsterhuis.nl
About Lucid Group
Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) is a technology company creating exceptional mobility experiences through innovation to drive the world forward. Built on Lucid's proprietary technology and software defined vehicle architectures, the company's lineup of award-winning vehicles brings Lucid's "Compromise Nothing™" approach to premium segments of the global automotive market. Lucid designs and engineers its products in-house and manufactures at its vertically integrated facilities in Arizona and Saudi Arabia, enabling continuous innovation across vehicles, software, and advanced driver assistance and autonomy-ready capabilities.
About Munsterhuis Autobedrijven
Munsterhuis Autobedrijven is a leading Dutch automotive group with more than 60 years of experience in vehicle sales and mobility services. Serving both private and business customers, the company offers a comprehensive range of automotive solutions, including vehicle sales, maintenance, leasing, rental, insurance, and repair services. As a family-owned business with multiple locations in the Netherlands, Munsterhuis is recognized for its customer-focused approach and commitment to quality and service.
Media Contact
Sebastian Michel
PR & Communications Manager Europe at Lucid
[email protected]
Camilla Jokisch
Lead PR & Communications Europe at Lucid
[email protected]
Forward-Looking Statements
This communication includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as "estimate," "plan," "project," "forecast," "intend," "will," "shall," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "seek," "target," "continue," "could," "may," "might," "possible," "potential," "predict" or other similar expressions that predict or indicate future events or trends or that are not statements of historical matters. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding Lucid's expansion in Europe and the expected benefits of Lucid's retail partnership with Munsterhuis, including expanded customer access and service coverage in the Netherlands. These statements are based on various assumptions, whether or not identified in this communication, and on the current expectations of Lucid's management. These forward-looking statements are not intended to serve as, and must not be relied on by any investor as, a guarantee, an assurance, or a definitive statement of fact or probability. Actual events and circumstances are difficult or impossible to predict and may differ from these forward-looking statements. Many actual events and circumstances are beyond the control of Lucid. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those factors discussed under the cautionary language and the Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qs, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other documents Lucid has filed or will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If any of these risks materialize or Lucid's assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from the results implied by these forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that Lucid currently does not know or that Lucid currently believes are immaterial that could also cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements reflect Lucid's expectations, plans or forecasts of future events and views as of the date of this communication. Lucid anticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause Lucid's assessments to change. However, while Lucid may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, Lucid specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. These forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing Lucid's assessments as of any date subsequent to the date of this communication. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed upon the forward-looking statements.
1)
GERMANY
Lucid Air 325 - 920 kW (442 - 1.251 PS), 694 - 960 km kombinierte Reichweite (WLTP), 0 g CO₂/km, 19,1 - 11,8 kWh/100 km, CO₂-Klasse: A.
Die Werte wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Verfahren WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure) ermittelt. Der Energieverbrauch und die Reichweite des Fahrzeugs im tatsächlichen Betrieb sind von verschiedenen Faktoren abhängig, u.a. dem Einbau von Ausstattung aus dem Teilehandel und Zubehör sowie Wetter- und Verkehrsbedingungen und dem persönlichen Fahrverhalten.
Weitere Informationen zum offiziellen Kraftstoffverbrauch, den offiziellen spezifischen CO₂-Emissionen sowie zum Stromverbrauch neuer Personenkraftwagen sind im kostenlosen Leitfaden zum Kraftstoffverbrauch der Deutsche Automobil Treuhand (DAT), auch abrufbar unter www.dat.de/co2, verfügbar.
NETHERLANDS
Lucid Air 325 - 920 kW (442 - 1.251 pk), 694 - 960 km gecombineerde actieradius (WLTP), 0 g CO₂ per gereden km (WLTP), energieverbruik 19,1 - 11,8 kWh/100 km.
De actieradius is gebaseerd op de WLTP-procedure (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure). De WLTP-waarden zijn gebaseerd op tests van het voertuig met de standaarduitrusting af fabriek. Het energieverbruik en de actieradius van een voertuig kunnen worden beïnvloed door de installatie van uitrustingen, onderdelen en accessoires, alsook door weers- en verkeersomstandigheden en persoonlijk rijgedrag.
SWITZERLAND – GERMAN
Lucid Air 325 - 920 kW (442 - 1.251 PS), 694 - 960 km kombinierte Reichweite (WLTP), Energieverbrauch (Fahrbetrieb): 19,1 - 11,8 kWh/100 km, Benzinäquivalent: 1,30 - 2,10 l/100 km, CO₂-Emissionen (Fahrbetrieb): 0 g/km, CO₂-Emissionen aus der Treibstoff- und/oder Strombereitstellung: 13 - 21 g/km, Energieeffizienz-Kategorie: A - C.
Die Werte wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Verfahren WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure) ermittelt. Der Energieverbrauch und die Reichweite des Fahrzeugs im tatsächlichen Betrieb sind von verschiedenen Faktoren abhängig, u.a. dem Einbau von Ausstattung aus dem Teilehandel und Zubehör sowie Wetter- und Verkehrsbedingungen und dem persönlichen Fahrverhalten.
CO₂ ist das für die Erderwärmung hauptverantwortliche Treibhausgas; die mittlere CO₂-Emission aller (markenübergreifend) angebotenen Fahrzeugtypen beträgt 111 g/km für das Jahr 2026; der Zielwert liegt bei 93,6 g/km.
SWITZERLAND – FRENCH
Lucid Air 325 - 920 kW (442 - 1.251 ch), 694 - 960 km d'autonomie combinée (WLTP), consommation d'énergie (liée à la conduite): 19,1 - 11,8 kWh/100 km, équivalent essence: 1,30 - 2,10 l/100 km, émissions de CO₂ (liées à la conduite): 0 g/km, émissions de CO₂ liées à la fourniture de carburant et/ou d'électricité: 13 - 21 g/km, catégorie d'efficacité énergétique: A - C.
Les valeurs d'autonomie sont basées sur la procédure WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure, Procédure d'essai mondiale harmonisée pour les véhicules légers). Les valeurs WLTP sont déterminées à partir de tests réalisés avec l'équipement standard d'usine. La consommation d'énergie et l'autonomie peuvent être influencées par l'installation de pièces, d'équipements et d'accessoires achetés sur le marché, ainsi que par des facteurs tels que les conditions météorologiques, les conditions de circulation et le style de conduite.
Le CO₂ est le principal gaz à effet de serre responsable du réchauffement climatique; les émissions moyennes de CO₂ de tous les types de véhicules proposés (quelle que soit la marque) s'élèvent à 111 g/km pour l'année 2026, la valeur cible provisoire étant 93,6 g/km.
NORWAY
Lucid Air 325 - 920 kW (442 - 1.251 hk), 694 - 960 km kombinert rekkevidde (WLTP), 0 g CO₂/km, 19,1 - 11,8 kWh/100 km.
Rekkevidden er bestemt i henhold til WLTP-prosedyren (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure). WLTP-verdiene er basert på tester av kjøretøyet med standardutstyret fra fabrikken. Bilens energiforbruk og rekkevidde kan påvirkes av ettermontert utstyr og tilbehør, vær- og trafikkforhold samt personlig kjøreatferd.
2)
GERMANY Lucid Gravity 418 - 617 kW (568 - 839 PS), 511 - 748 km kombinierte Reichweite (WLTP), 0 g CO₂/km, 19,4 - 18,2 kWh/100 km, CO₂-Klasse: A.
Die Werte wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Verfahren WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure) ermittelt. Der Energieverbrauch und die Reichweite des Fahrzeugs im tatsächlichen Betrieb sind von verschiedenen Faktoren abhängig, u.a. dem Einbau von Ausstattung aus dem Teilehandel und Zubehör sowie Wetter- und Verkehrsbedingungen und dem persönlichen Fahrverhalten.
Weitere Informationen zum offiziellen Kraftstoffverbrauch, den offiziellen spezifischen CO₂-Emissionen sowie zum Stromverbrauch neuer Personenkraftwagen sind im kostenlosen Leitfaden zum Kraftstoffverbrauch der Deutsche Automobil Treuhand (DAT), auch abrufbar unter www.dat.de/co2, verfügbar.
NETHERLANDS
Lucid Gravity 418 - 617 kW (568 - 839 pk), 511 - 748 km gecombineerde actieradius (WLTP), 0 g CO₂ per gereden km, energieverbruik 19,4 - 18,2 kWh/100 km.
De actieradius is gebaseerd op de WLTP-procedure (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure). De WLTP-waarden zijn gebaseerd op tests van het voertuig met de standaarduitrusting af fabriek. Het energieverbruik en de actieradius van een voertuig kunnen worden beïnvloed door de installatie van uitrustingen, onderdelen en accessoires, alsook door weers- en verkeersomstandigheden en persoonlijk rijgedrag.
SWITZERLAND – GERMAN
Lucid Gravity 418 - 617 kW (568 - 839 PS), 511 - 748 km kombinierte Reichweite (WLTP), Energieverbrauch (Fahrbetrieb): 19,4 - 18,2 kWh/100 km, Benzinäquivalent: 2,00 - 2,13 l/100 km, CO₂-Emissionen (Fahrbetrieb): 0 g/km, CO₂-Emissionen aus der Treibstoff- und/oder Strombereitstellung: 20 - 22 g/km, Energieeffizienz-Kategorie: B - C.
Die Werte wurden nach dem vorgeschriebenen Verfahren WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure) ermittelt. Der Energieverbrauch und die Reichweite des Fahrzeugs im tatsächlichen Betrieb sind von verschiedenen Faktoren abhängig, u.a. dem Einbau von Ausstattung aus dem Teilehandel und Zubehör sowie Wetter- und Verkehrsbedingungen und dem persönlichen Fahrverhalten.
CO₂ ist das für die Erderwärmung hauptverantwortliche Treibhausgas; die mittlere CO₂-Emission aller (markenübergreifend) angebotenen Fahrzeugtypen beträgt 111 g/km für das Jahr 2026; der Zielwert liegt bei 93,6 g/km.
SWITZERLAND – FRENCH
Lucid Gravity 418 - 617 kW (568 - 839 ch), 511 - 748 km d'autonomie combinée (WLTP), consommation d'énergie (liée à la conduite): 19,4 - 18,2 kWh/100 km, équivalent essence: 2,00 - 2,13 l/100 km, émissions de CO₂ (liées à la conduite): 0 g/km, émissions de CO₂ liées à la fourniture de carburant et/ou d'électricité: 20 - 22 g/km, catégorie d'efficacité énergétique: B - C.
Les valeurs d'autonomie sont basées sur la procédure WLTP (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure, Procédure d'essai mondiale harmonisée pour les véhicules légers). Les valeurs WLTP sont déterminées à partir de tests réalisés avec l'équipement standard d'usine. La consommation d'énergie et l'autonomie peuvent être influencées par l'installation de pièces, d'équipements et d'accessoires achetés sur le marché, ainsi que par des facteurs tels que les conditions météorologiques, les conditions de circulation et le style de conduite.
Le CO₂ est le principal gaz à effet de serre responsable du réchauffement climatique; les émissions moyennes de CO₂ de tous les types de véhicules proposés (quelle que soit la marque) s'élèvent à 111 g/km pour l'année 2026, la valeur cible provisoire étant 93,6 g/km.
NORWAY
Lucid Gravity 418 - 617 kW (568 - 839 hk), 511 - 748 km kombinert rekkevidde (WLTP), 0 g CO₂/km, 19,4 - 18,2 kWh/100 km.
Rekkevidden er bestemt i henhold til WLTP-prosedyren (Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Procedure). WLTP-verdiene er basert på tester av kjøretøyet med standardutstyret fra fabrikken. Bilens energiforbruk og rekkevidde kan påvirkes av ettermontert utstyr og tilbehør, vær- og trafikkforhold samt personlig kjøreatferd.
Aurora Investment Counsel ve 2. čtvrtletí otevřela novou pozici v Qualys a koupila 18 653 akcií za zhruba 2,565 milionu USD. Generální ředitel Sumedh S. Thakar mezitím prodal 30 000 akcií.
Aurora Investment Counsel acquired a new position in Qualys, Inc. (NASDAQ:QLYS – Free Report) during the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor acquired 18,653 shares of the software maker’s stock, valued at approximately $2,565,000. Qualys comprises approximately 1.3% of Aurora Investment Counsel’s holdings, making the stock its 15th largest position. Aurora Investment Counsel owned 0.05% of Qualys at the end of the most recent reporting period.
Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. Strive Financial Group LLC acquired a new position in shares of Qualys during the 4th quarter worth $27,000. Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co. lifted its stake in shares of Qualys by 204.3% in the 4th quarter. Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co. now owns 213 shares of the software maker’s stock valued at $28,000 after purchasing an additional 143 shares during the last quarter. Root Financial Partners LLC lifted its stake in shares of Qualys by 206.2% in the 1st quarter. Root Financial Partners LLC now owns 297 shares of the software maker’s stock valued at $26,000 after purchasing an additional 200 shares during the last quarter. Employees Retirement System of Texas acquired a new stake in shares of Qualys in the 4th quarter valued at $43,000. Finally, Caitong International Asset Management Co. Ltd boosted its holdings in Qualys by 37,400.0% in the fourth quarter. Caitong International Asset Management Co. Ltd now owns 375 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $50,000 after purchasing an additional 374 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors own 99.31% of the company’s stock.
Insider Activity In related news, CEO Sumedh S. Thakar sold 30,000 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, June 30th. The shares were sold at an average price of $135.00, for a total transaction of $4,050,000.00. Following the completion of the sale, the chief executive officer owned 196,686 shares in the company, valued at $26,552,610. This trade represents a 13.23% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available through the SEC website. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, CFO Joo Mi Kim sold 1,627 shares of Qualys stock in a transaction dated Monday, August 3rd. The shares were sold at an average price of $153.04, for a total transaction of $248,996.08. Following the transaction, the chief financial officer directly owned 75,743 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $11,591,708.72. This represents a 2.10% decrease in their ownership of the stock. Additional details regarding this sale are available in the official SEC disclosure. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Insiders have sold a total of 71,979 shares of company stock worth $9,217,993 over the last 90 days. 0.72% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.
Qualys Stock Down 0.7% Qualys stock opened at $186.68 on Thursday. The business has a 50 day moving average price of $148.18 and a two-hundred day moving average price of $115.16. The stock has a market cap of $6.46 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 32.30 and a beta of 0.60. Qualys, Inc. has a 12 month low of $74.51 and a 12 month high of $201.54. Qualys (NASDAQ:QLYS – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, August 4th. The software maker reported $1.98 earnings per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.78 by $0.20. Qualys had a return on equity of 37.52% and a net margin of 29.38%.The company had revenue of $182.18 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $178.57 million. During the same quarter last year, the firm earned $1.68 EPS. Qualys’s revenue for the quarter was up 11.1% compared to the same quarter last year. Qualys has set its FY 2026 guidance at 7.740-7.880 EPS and its Q3 2026 guidance at 1.910-1.980 EPS. On average, analysts expect that Qualys, Inc. will post 5.85 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Analyst Ratings Changes QLYS has been the topic of several analyst reports. Jefferies Financial Group increased their target price on shares of Qualys from $150.00 to $185.00 and gave the stock a “hold” rating in a research report on Wednesday, August 5th. JPMorgan Chase & Co. boosted their price target on Qualys from $139.00 to $150.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Monday, July 27th. Weiss Ratings upgraded Qualys from a “hold (c-)” rating to a “hold (c)” rating in a research note on Thursday, July 16th. Morgan Stanley increased their price objective on Qualys from $115.00 to $130.00 and gave the company an “underweight” rating in a report on Wednesday, August 5th. Finally, Piper Sandler raised their price objective on Qualys from $100.00 to $175.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a research note on Wednesday, August 5th. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, three have given a Buy rating, eleven have assigned a Hold rating and one has given a Sell rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $170.53.
Check Out Our Latest Analysis on Qualys
Qualys Profile (Free Report)
Qualys, Inc (NASDAQ: QLYS) is a leading provider of cloud-based security and compliance solutions designed to help organizations streamline their IT security programs. Operating on a unified, modular platform, Qualys offers continuous visibility into global IT assets through a combination of lightweight cloud agents and on-premises scanner appliances. The platform supports an array of security and compliance use cases, enabling real-time detection of vulnerabilities, policy violations and misconfigurations across on-premises, cloud and hybrid environments.
The company’s flagship Qualys Cloud Platform delivers a suite of integrated applications, including vulnerability management, detection and response (VMDR), policy compliance, web application scanning, file integrity monitoring, asset inventory and container security.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Qualys Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding QLYS? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Qualys, Inc. (NASDAQ:QLYS – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Qualys Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Qualys and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Polská Arlen chce koupit přes 75 % akcií Prabos plus od hlavního akcionáře Juraje Vozára za zhruba 195 milionů Kč. Transakce má proběhnout ve dvou fázích.
Polský výrobce textilií a ochranného oblečení pro uniformované složky Arlen chce koupit přes 75 procent akcií obuvnické firmy Prabos plus ze Slavičína na Zlínsku. Odkoupí je od hlavního akcionáře Prabosu Juraje Vozára, a to ve dvou krocích za zhruba 195 milionů korun, uvedl dnes server Seznam Zprávy. Informují o tom také polská média.
Polská firma svůj záměr zveřejnila v hlášení pro varšavskou burzu, kde se obchodují její akcie. Firmy podepsaly takzvané memorandum o porozumění. Transakce bude ve dvou fázích, pokud se strany nedohodnou jinak. V první fázi získá Arlen 600.000 akcií Prabosu, což představuje šedesátiprocentní podíl. Zaplatí za něj 6,4 milionu eur, což je téměř 155 milionů korun. Tato část obchodu má být uzavřena do 30. září, ale termín se může změnit.
Následně Arlen koupí dalších 15,66 procenta akcií. "Druhá fáze transakce má být provedena do třiceti dnů ode dne doručení písemné výzvy investora prodávajícímu, nejpozději však do dvou let ode dne uzavření transakce," uvádí hlášení Arlenu pro varšavskou burzu. Cena by měla být kolem 40 milionů korun.
Polský server Rzeczpospolita uvedl, že společnosti se dobře znají, protože spolupracovaly na společných nabídkách v tendrech na dodávky vybavení pro polskou armádu. Nyní chtějí vytvořit jednotnou firemní skupinu. Zda k tomu skutečně dojde, se teprve uvidí.
Prabos vyrábí pracovní obuv pro průmyslové použití, obuv pro vojenské, hasičské a policejní složky i obuv outdoorovou a loveckou. Společnost dodává či v minulosti dodávala své boty i pro armády Německa, Litvy, Švýcarska, Polska, Dánska, Lotyšska, Nizozemska nebo Velké Británie. Mezi významné tuzemské klienty patří zejména Armáda a Policie České republiky, Generální ředitelství cel, ČEZ, Lesy ČR a Škoda Auto. Firma v roce 2018 vstoupila na trh Start pražské burzy.
Firma loni utržila z prodeje vlastních výrobků a služeb a za prodej zboží necelých 351 milionů korun. V předchozím roce tržby činily 355 milionů korun. Čistý zisk loni klesl na 12,2 milionu korun z 30,7 milionu v roce 2024. Firma na konci loňského roku zaměstnávala 198 lidí. ČTK to dnes zjistila z výroční zprávy společnosti zveřejněné ve Sbírce listin.
Tradice firmy sahá do roku 1860, kdy vznikla společnost Japis, která zpracovávala usně a po první světové válce zahájila výrobu obuvi. Po znárodnění v roce 1948 přešla společnost Japis pod správu podniku Baťa a následně byla v roce 1952 začleněna do Svitu Gottwaldov. V roce 1991 se závod transformoval jako samostatná divize společnosti Svit Zlín. V roce 1993 získala společnost právní subjektivitu pod názvem Prabos a.s. Slavičín, která se postupně transformovala na současnou Prabos plus.
Bell & Brown Wealth Advisors ve 2. čtvrtletí koupila nový podíl ve společnosti Williams-Sonoma za zhruba 6,735 milionu USD. Firma zároveň oznámila čtvrtletní dividendu ve výši 0,76 USD na akcii.
Bell & Brown Wealth Advisors LLC bought a new stake in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (NYSE:WSM – Free Report) during the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor bought 28,894 shares of the specialty retailer’s stock, valued at approximately $6,735,000. Williams-Sonoma comprises about 2.0% of Bell & Brown Wealth Advisors LLC’s portfolio, making the stock its 14th biggest position.
Several other hedge funds have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. Strategic Advisory Partners LLC bought a new position in shares of Williams-Sonoma during the second quarter valued at approximately $272,000. Csenge Advisory Group bought a new stake in Williams-Sonoma in the second quarter valued at $407,000. Johnson Financial Group Inc. purchased a new position in Williams-Sonoma during the 2nd quarter valued at $151,000. Tocqueville Asset Management L.P. bought a new position in Williams-Sonoma in the 2nd quarter worth $19,046,000. Finally, Empirical Asset Management LLC bought a new position in Williams-Sonoma in the 2nd quarter worth $803,000. Institutional investors own 99.29% of the company’s stock.
Williams-Sonoma Price Performance Shares of NYSE WSM opened at $242.34 on Thursday. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a 1 year low of $165.51 and a 1 year high of $254.89. The stock has a market cap of $28.54 billion, a P/E ratio of 27.14, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.65 and a beta of 1.50. The firm has a 50-day moving average of $231.71 and a 200 day moving average of $207.33.
Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:WSM – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, May 21st. The specialty retailer reported $1.93 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.80 by $0.13. The business had revenue of $1.81 billion for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $1.80 billion. Williams-Sonoma had a net margin of 13.81% and a return on equity of 53.29%. The business’s revenue was up 4.4% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company earned $1.85 earnings per share. Research analysts expect that Williams-Sonoma, Inc. will post 9.38 earnings per share for the current fiscal year. Williams-Sonoma Dividend Announcement The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, August 21st. Stockholders of record on Friday, July 17th will be given a $0.76 dividend. This represents a $3.04 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 1.3%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, July 17th. Williams-Sonoma’s payout ratio is currently 34.04%.
Insider Transactions at Williams-Sonoma In other Williams-Sonoma news, CEO Laura Alber sold 15,000 shares of the stock in a transaction on Wednesday, May 27th. The stock was sold at an average price of $200.00, for a total transaction of $3,000,000.00. Following the sale, the chief executive officer directly owned 923,524 shares in the company, valued at approximately $184,704,800. This trade represents a 1.60% decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is accessible through this hyperlink. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Also, EVP Karalyn Yearout sold 1,112 shares of Williams-Sonoma stock in a transaction on Monday, June 15th. The stock was sold at an average price of $228.49, for a total value of $254,080.88. Following the completion of the sale, the executive vice president directly owned 21,717 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $4,962,117.33. The trade was a 4.87% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. In the last quarter, insiders sold 18,156 shares of company stock worth $3,738,699. 1.10% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.
Analysts Set New Price Targets A number of equities research analysts have recently weighed in on the stock. Telsey Advisory Group lifted their target price on shares of Williams-Sonoma from $225.00 to $255.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research note on Thursday, August 13th. Bank of America assumed coverage on shares of Williams-Sonoma in a research note on Friday, June 12th. They issued a “buy” rating and a $250.00 price target for the company. Royal Bank Of Canada lifted their price objective on Williams-Sonoma from $192.00 to $260.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research report on Friday, August 14th. Argus set a $230.00 target price on Williams-Sonoma in a report on Friday, May 29th. Finally, Wells Fargo & Company increased their target price on Williams-Sonoma from $190.00 to $240.00 and gave the stock an “equal weight” rating in a research report on Tuesday, August 11th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, eight have assigned a Buy rating and nine have issued a Hold rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $231.88.
Get Our Latest Analysis on Williams-Sonoma
Williams-Sonoma Profile (Free Report)
Williams‑Sonoma, Inc is a specialty retailer focused on the home and culinary markets, best known for premium cookware, kitchen tools and home furnishings. The company traces its roots to a single cookware store founded by Chuck Williams in 1956 in Sonoma, California, and has evolved into a multi‑brand home furnishings and housewares business. Its merchandise mix spans cookware and kitchen electrics, tabletop and food prep items, furniture, bedding, lighting and decorative accessories designed for both everyday use and higher‑end interiors.
The company operates a portfolio of consumer brands that target distinct segments of the home market.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Williams-Sonoma Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Williams-Sonoma Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Williams-Sonoma and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Aurora Investment Counsel ve 2. čtvrtletí otevřela novou pozici v Essential Utilities a koupila 68 633 akcií za zhruba 2,629 milionu USD. Firma zároveň oznámila vyšší čtvrtletní dividendu ve výši 0,3606 USD na akcii.
Aurora Investment Counsel acquired a new position in Essential Utilities Inc. (NYSE:WTRG – Free Report) in the second quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor acquired 68,633 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $2,629,000. Essential Utilities makes up approximately 1.4% of Aurora Investment Counsel’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 12th largest position.
Several other hedge funds have also recently bought and sold shares of the business. Fideuram Asset Management Ireland dac bought a new position in shares of Essential Utilities in the fourth quarter valued at approximately $27,000. Evolution Wealth Management Inc. acquired a new position in Essential Utilities during the 1st quarter worth $27,000. Caitong International Asset Management Co. Ltd bought a new stake in Essential Utilities during the fourth quarter valued at about $32,000. Mitsubishi UFJ Asset Management Co. Ltd. bought a new stake in Essential Utilities during the second quarter valued at about $33,000. Finally, Motiv8 Investments LLC acquired a new stake in shares of Essential Utilities in the fourth quarter valued at about $35,000. 74.78% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.
Essential Utilities Trading Up 1.7% Essential Utilities stock opened at $41.04 on Thursday. The business has a 50 day moving average price of $38.96 and a two-hundred day moving average price of $38.95. The company has a quick ratio of 0.62, a current ratio of 0.78 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.20. The stock has a market cap of $11.65 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 20.94 and a beta of 0.64. Essential Utilities Inc. has a 12 month low of $36.10 and a 12 month high of $42.37.
Essential Utilities (NYSE:WTRG – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Wednesday, August 5th. The company reported $0.38 earnings per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $0.37 by $0.01. The company had revenue of $530.85 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $538.90 million. Essential Utilities had a return on equity of 8.23% and a net margin of 21.60%.Essential Utilities’s revenue for the quarter was up 3.1% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter last year, the firm earned $0.38 EPS. As a group, equities analysts forecast that Essential Utilities Inc. will post 2.21 EPS for the current year. Essential Utilities Increases Dividend The company also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, September 1st. Investors of record on Tuesday, August 11th will be given a $0.3606 dividend. This represents a $1.44 annualized dividend and a yield of 3.5%. This is an increase from Essential Utilities’s previous quarterly dividend of $0.34. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, August 11th. Essential Utilities’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 73.47%.
Insiders Place Their Bets In other Essential Utilities news, insider Colleen Arnold sold 2,855 shares of Essential Utilities stock in a transaction on Friday, August 7th. The shares were sold at an average price of $39.55, for a total transaction of $112,915.25. Following the sale, the insider owned 17,347 shares in the company, valued at $686,073.85. The trade was a 14.13% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at this link. 0.36% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.
Analysts Set New Price Targets Several analysts recently weighed in on the company. Wall Street Zen upgraded Essential Utilities to a “sell” rating in a research note on Saturday, July 4th. Weiss Ratings reaffirmed a “hold (c+)” rating on shares of Essential Utilities in a research report on Friday, May 22nd. UBS Group upped their price target on Essential Utilities from $43.00 to $46.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, July 2nd. Finally, Barclays increased their price objective on Essential Utilities from $38.00 to $40.00 and gave the company an “underweight” rating in a research report on Wednesday, July 15th. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, two have assigned a Buy rating, four have issued a Hold rating and one has assigned a Sell rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the company has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $43.00.
Check Out Our Latest Analysis on Essential Utilities
(Free Report)
Essential Utilities, Inc, formerly known as Aqua America, is a publicly traded water and natural gas utility holding company. Through its regulated water and wastewater subsidiaries, the company provides essential water services to residential, commercial and industrial customers. In addition, Essential Utilities delivers natural gas distribution services in Pennsylvania through its Peoples Gas subsidiary, offering integrated utility solutions under a unified corporate framework.
The company traces its roots to the Philadelphia Suburban Water Company, founded in 1886 to serve growing communities outside Philadelphia.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Essential Utilities Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Essential Utilities Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Essential Utilities and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Aurora Investment Counsel ve 2. čtvrtletí otevřela novou pozici v Xylem a koupila 4 723 akcií za zhruba 558 000 USD. Xylem zároveň oznámila zisk na akcii 1,46 USD, nad odhadem 1,34 USD.
Aurora Investment Counsel bought a new position in shares of Xylem Inc. (NYSE:XYL – Free Report) in the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm bought 4,723 shares of the industrial products company’s stock, valued at approximately $558,000.
Other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently modified their holdings of the company. Callahan Advisors LLC acquired a new position in shares of Xylem during the fourth quarter worth approximately $1,721,000. Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co. boosted its position in Xylem by 2,309.7% in the fourth quarter. Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Co. now owns 431,824 shares of the industrial products company’s stock worth $54,314,000 after purchasing an additional 413,904 shares during the last quarter. Abacus Wealth Partners LLC purchased a new position in Xylem in the fourth quarter valued at about $1,663,000. Norges Bank bought a new position in Xylem during the fourth quarter valued at $361,012,000. Finally, MUFG Securities EMEA plc increased its stake in shares of Xylem by 608.1% in the fourth quarter. MUFG Securities EMEA plc now owns 32,990 shares of the industrial products company’s stock worth $4,493,000 after purchasing an additional 28,331 shares in the last quarter. 87.96% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.
Xylem Price Performance Shares of XYL stock opened at $116.28 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.23, a quick ratio of 1.24 and a current ratio of 1.61. The business’s 50 day moving average price is $117.87 and its 200-day moving average price is $120.03. The firm has a market cap of $27.15 billion, a P/E ratio of 27.69, a P/E/G ratio of 1.58 and a beta of 1.02. Xylem Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $105.29 and a fifty-two week high of $154.27.
Xylem (NYSE:XYL – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, July 28th. The industrial products company reported $1.46 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.34 by $0.12. The business had revenue of $2.34 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $2.34 billion. Xylem had a net margin of 11.15% and a return on equity of 11.77%. The company’s revenue for the quarter was up 1.5% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the prior year, the business earned $1.26 EPS. Xylem has set its FY 2026 guidance at 5.550-5.700 EPS. On average, equities research analysts anticipate that Xylem Inc. will post 5.67 earnings per share for the current year. Xylem Announces Dividend The business also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, September 24th. Shareholders of record on Thursday, August 27th will be issued a $0.43 dividend. The ex-dividend date is Thursday, August 27th. This represents a $1.72 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.5%. Xylem’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is 40.95%.
Analyst Ratings Changes Several research analysts have commented on the stock. Mizuho raised their price target on shares of Xylem from $124.00 to $130.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a report on Wednesday, July 29th. Stifel Nicolaus boosted their price target on shares of Xylem from $157.00 to $160.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, July 29th. UBS Group increased their price target on shares of Xylem from $135.00 to $138.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a report on Thursday, August 13th. Oppenheimer lowered their price objective on shares of Xylem from $160.00 to $158.00 and set an “outperform” rating on the stock in a research report on Wednesday, April 29th. Finally, Jefferies Financial Group raised shares of Xylem from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and lifted their price objective for the stock from $130.00 to $140.00 in a report on Thursday, June 25th. Nine equities research analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and six have issued a Hold rating to the stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $154.23.
View Our Latest Analysis on XYL
About Xylem (Free Report)
Xylem Inc (NYSE: XYL) is a global water technology company that designs, manufactures and services engineered systems and equipment for the transport, treatment, testing and efficient use of water. Its product portfolio spans pumps and pumping systems, valves, filtration and disinfection equipment, sensors and analytical instruments, and digital solutions for monitoring and control of water infrastructure. Xylem serves the full water cycle with offerings for water and wastewater utilities, industrial customers, commercial and residential buildings, and agricultural applications.
The company was established as an independent publicly traded company in 2011 following a corporate spin-off from ITT Corporation and is headquartered in Rye Brook, New York.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Xylem Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding XYL? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Xylem Inc. (NYSE:XYL – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Xylem Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Xylem and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Aurora Investment Counsel bought a new position in Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (NYSE:KNSL – Free Report) in the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm bought 7,130 shares of the financial services provider’s stock, valued at approximately $2,352,000. Kinsale Capital Group accounts for 1.2% of Aurora Investment Counsel’s portfolio, making the stock its 23rd largest position.
Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also made changes to their positions in the company. AQR Capital Management LLC increased its position in Kinsale Capital Group by 76.2% during the 1st quarter. AQR Capital Management LLC now owns 835 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $397,000 after purchasing an additional 361 shares during the period. EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC lifted its stake in shares of Kinsale Capital Group by 72.9% in the second quarter. EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC now owns 102 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $49,000 after purchasing an additional 43 shares during the period. Brown Advisory Inc. boosted its holdings in Kinsale Capital Group by 7.9% during the second quarter. Brown Advisory Inc. now owns 1,117 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $541,000 after buying an additional 82 shares in the last quarter. Jump Financial LLC grew its position in Kinsale Capital Group by 136.9% during the second quarter. Jump Financial LLC now owns 1,097 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $531,000 after buying an additional 634 shares during the period. Finally, Cerity Partners LLC increased its holdings in Kinsale Capital Group by 45.3% in the second quarter. Cerity Partners LLC now owns 5,021 shares of the financial services provider’s stock valued at $2,430,000 after buying an additional 1,566 shares in the last quarter. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 85.36% of the company’s stock.
Insider Buying and Selling In other news, CAO Christopher R. Tangard acquired 330 shares of the stock in a transaction on Monday, June 8th. The stock was bought at an average price of $304.00 per share, with a total value of $100,320.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief accounting officer directly owned 380 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $115,520. The trade was a 660.00% increase in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through the SEC website. Also, insider Salmaan K. Allibhai sold 250 shares of Kinsale Capital Group stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, May 26th. The shares were sold at an average price of $311.17, for a total transaction of $77,792.50. Following the sale, the insider owned 3,645 shares in the company, valued at $1,134,214.65. This represents a 6.42% decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale is available in the SEC filing. 5.60% of the stock is owned by corporate insiders.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth A number of research analysts have recently weighed in on KNSL shares. TD Cowen restated a “hold” rating on shares of Kinsale Capital Group in a research report on Tuesday, June 16th. Morgan Stanley boosted their price target on Kinsale Capital Group from $345.00 to $390.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a report on Wednesday. JPMorgan Chase & Co. increased their price objective on shares of Kinsale Capital Group from $380.00 to $390.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a report on Monday, July 20th. Wells Fargo & Company boosted their price objective on shares of Kinsale Capital Group from $366.00 to $377.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a research note on Monday, July 27th. Finally, Wall Street Zen upgraded Kinsale Capital Group from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Saturday, June 20th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a Buy rating, six have issued a Hold rating and three have given a Sell rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has an average rating of “Reduce” and a consensus price target of $368.78. Get Our Latest Research Report on KNSL
Kinsale Capital Group Trading Up 2.1% Shares of KNSL opened at $380.55 on Thursday. The stock’s 50-day moving average is $343.87 and its two-hundred day moving average is $345.39. The stock has a market cap of $8.67 billion, a PE ratio of 15.42, a P/E/G ratio of 1.18 and a beta of 0.89. Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. has a 12 month low of $287.20 and a 12 month high of $485.00. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.11, a current ratio of 0.09 and a quick ratio of 0.09.
Kinsale Capital Group (NYSE:KNSL – Get Free Report) last issued its earnings results on Thursday, July 23rd. The financial services provider reported $5.54 earnings per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $5.11 by $0.43. Kinsale Capital Group had a return on equity of 25.54% and a net margin of 28.49%.The company had revenue of $548.52 million during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $445.13 million. During the same quarter in the prior year, the business earned $4.78 earnings per share. The company’s revenue was up 16.8% compared to the same quarter last year. Equities analysts forecast that Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. will post 21.1 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Kinsale Capital Group Announces Dividend The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Monday, September 14th. Shareholders of record on Friday, August 28th will be issued a $0.25 dividend. This represents a $1.00 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 0.3%. The ex-dividend date is Friday, August 28th. Kinsale Capital Group’s dividend payout ratio is currently 4.05%.
Kinsale Capital Group Company Profile (Free Report)
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc (NYSE:KNSL) is a specialty property and casualty insurance company headquartered in Richmond, Virginia. Established in 2009, the company focuses on underwriting complex and underserved risks across the United States. Kinsale operates through a network of wholesale brokers and independent agencies, offering tailored coverage solutions for a range of niche industries.
The company’s product portfolio includes general liability, business auto, professional liability, environmental liability, inland marine, cyber liability, and other specialty lines.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Kinsale Capital Group Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Kinsale Capital Group Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Kinsale Capital Group and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
EHang uzavřel strategickou rámcovou dohodu o záměru s China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corp., Ltd. (CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau) o výstavbě nízkoletové infrastruktury. První projekt v Lingao na Hainanu, Cross-Sea Low-Altitude Corridor Project, už oficiálně zahájil výstavbu a má propojit letiště, vertiporty a provoz eVTOL.
GUANGZHOU, China, Aug. 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- EHang Holdings Limited (Nasdaq: EH) (“EHang” or the “Company”), a world-leading advanced air mobility (“AAM”) technology platform company, today announced a strategic cooperation framework agreement of intent with China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corp., Ltd. (“CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau”), a top-tier state-owned infrastructure giant in China. The partnership intends to focus on low-altitude infrastructure development and operational scenario planning. The Cross-Sea Low-Altitude Corridor Project in Lingao, Hainan (the “Project”) marks the first project to break ground under the partnership, aiming to establish a closed-loop low altitude economy ecosystem that integrates infrastructure and commercial operations.
Under the framework agreement, China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau will draw on its industrial chain strengths and state-owned enterprise resources to jointly develop low‑altitude infrastructure such as general aviation airports, eVTOL vertiports and hangars tailored for low‑altitude flight operations and project planning and implementation. EHang, in turn, will deploy its core expertise in R&D, airworthiness certification and operations of pilotless passenger‑grade eVTOLs, providing aircraft alongside supporting operational and technical solutions.
The Project, as the first implementation of the partnership, has officially commenced construction, with Hainan Fuma General Aviation, a client and partner of EHang, as the project owner, CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau as the main constructor and EHang providing joint planning of infrastructure and operational sites, aircraft, operational services and technical support.
Centered around the Maniao General Aviation Airport, the Project will develop multiple eVTOL operational sites and vertiports along Lingao’s coastline, with plans to implement point-to-point passenger eVTOL routes and cross-sea shuttle services. The first key flight station, the WingHub South Sea, is taking shape and will include an operations and exhibition center, vertiports compatible with EHang’s pilotless eVTOL aircraft, and testing zones. The center’s application rollout will be implemented in phases: starting from offering aerial sightseeing, low-altitude logistics, training, and testing, followed by expansion to cross-sea passenger transport.
In December 2025, EH216-S completed a 22-kilometer cross-sea flight across the Qiongzhou Strait in 18 minutes, from Haikou in Hainan to Xuwen Port in Guangdong, validating the technical capabilities and efficiency of pilotless eVTOLs in cross-sea applications.
Hainan's 15th Five-Year Comprehensive Transportation Plan calls for the development of island-wide and cross-sea low-altitude route networks, as well as upgrades of general aviation airports and construction of low-altitude vertical takeoff and landing infrastructure. The Maniao General Aviation Airport in Lingao has been included among 36 major low-altitude infrastructure projects of Hainan's 15th Five-Year plan. Upon completion, the airport is expected to support point-to-point eVTOL flights between Lingao in Hainan and Xuwen in Guangdong, serving as the key base of an “aerial express corridor” across the inter-provincial Qiongzhou Strait.
A representative of CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau, stated, “As a strategic emerging industry and an important area of future development, the low-altitude economy is becoming an important driver of new quality productive forces and urban development. We will leverage its strengths in engineering construction, infrastructure investment and urban development to work with EHang, a leading eVTOL enterprise, on low-altitude infrastructure and application scenarios, supporting the standardized and high-quality development of the low-altitude economy in China.”
Zhao Wang, Chief Operating Officer of EHang, said, “With our pilotless human-carrying eVTOL aircraft that have met the technical and airworthiness requirements for commercial operations, infrastructure remains a critical enabler for scaling real-world applications. Our strategic partnership with CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau will bring together infrastructure development capabilities and EHang’s pilotless eVTOL technology to accelerate the build-out of AAM operational infrastructure and flight route network. Starting with the Project in Lingao, Hainan, EHang will work with CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau from infrastructure planning through operation launch. We look forward to applying this integrated approach to more cities and regions.”
(Image: EHang and CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau Sign Strategic Cooperation Framework Agreement)
(Image: Conceptual Planning Rendering of the WingHub South Sea)
About EHang
EHang (Nasdaq: EH) is the world’s leading advanced air mobility (“AAM”) technology platform company, committed to making safe, autonomous, and eco-friendly air mobility accessible to everyone. The company develops and manufactures a diversified portfolio of pilotless electric vertical take-off and landing (“eVTOL”) aircraft for a wide range of use cases, including aerial tourism, intra-city transport, intercity travel, logistics and emergency firefighting. Its flagship model, EH216-S, has obtained the world’s first type certificate, production certificate and standard airworthiness certificate for pilotless eVTOL issued by the Civil Aviation Administration of China, and is now commercially operated under the country’s first Air Operator Certificates for human-carrying eVTOL services. Complementing this, EHang’s VT35 expands its reach into long-range and intercity scenarios, supporting the development of a multi-tiered low-altitude mobility network. By integrating advanced autonomous technologies with scalable operational infrastructure, EHang is redefining how people and goods move—across cities, regions, and natural barriers—shaping the future of air mobility. For more information, please visit www.ehang.com.
About CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau
China Construction Sixth Engineering Bureau Corp., Ltd. (“CSCEC Sixth Engineering Bureau”) is a core member of China State Construction Engineering Corporation, a Fortune Global 500 company. With registered capital of RMB6.278 billion, the company holds top-tier qualifications in building construction, municipal engineering and highway construction, and first-class qualifications in water conservancy, river and lake management and real estate development. Its core businesses include infrastructure, high-end building construction and real estate. The company provides integrated services covering planning, investment, design, construction, operations and technical consulting, with a focus on developing capabilities across the full project lifecycle.
Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains statements that may constitute “forward-looking” statements pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “aims,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “likely to” and similar statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about management’s beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to those relating to certifications, our expectations regarding demand for, and market acceptance of, our products and solutions and the commercialization of UAM services, our relationships with strategic partners, and current litigation and potential litigation involving us. Management has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. While they believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond management’s control. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause EHang’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Aurora Investment Counsel ve 2. čtvrtletí nově nakoupila 64 127 akcií Five9 za zhruba 1,367 milionu USD. Podíl institucionálních investorů ve Five9 činí 96,64 %.
Aurora Investment Counsel acquired a new position in shares of Five9, Inc. (NASDAQ:FIVN – Free Report) in the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor acquired 64,127 shares of the software maker’s stock, valued at approximately $1,367,000. Aurora Investment Counsel owned approximately 0.08% of Five9 at the end of the most recent reporting period.
Other hedge funds and other institutional investors also recently made changes to their positions in the company. Quarry LP acquired a new position in Five9 in the third quarter valued at about $33,000. Advisory Services Network LLC bought a new position in shares of Five9 in the third quarter valued at approximately $38,000. EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Five9 by 378.7% in the 1st quarter. EverSource Wealth Advisors LLC now owns 1,728 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $26,000 after acquiring an additional 1,367 shares in the last quarter. Rothschild Investment LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Five9 by 3,572.0% in the 4th quarter. Rothschild Investment LLC now owns 1,836 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $37,000 after acquiring an additional 1,786 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Global Retirement Partners LLC bought a new stake in Five9 during the 2nd quarter worth approximately $45,000. 96.64% of the stock is owned by institutional investors.
Insiders Place Their Bets In other Five9 news, EVP Panos Kozanian sold 5,869 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Thursday, June 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $24.81, for a total transaction of $145,609.89. Following the completion of the transaction, the executive vice president owned 161,671 shares in the company, valued at approximately $4,011,057.51. This represents a 3.50% decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this link. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Also, CAO Leena Mansharamani sold 2,556 shares of Five9 stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, June 4th. The shares were sold at an average price of $24.81, for a total value of $63,414.36. Following the completion of the sale, the chief accounting officer directly owned 57,698 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,431,487.38. This represents a 4.24% decrease in their position. Additional details regarding this sale are available in the official SEC disclosure. The sale was made to cover tax withholding obligations related to the vesting of equity awards. Insiders have sold a total of 56,003 shares of company stock valued at $1,386,457 in the last ninety days. 1.20% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.
Five9 Stock Up 0.9% Shares of NASDAQ:FIVN opened at $32.74 on Thursday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.94, a current ratio of 4.15 and a quick ratio of 4.15. The stock has a market cap of $2.51 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 47.45 and a beta of 1.42. The company has a 50 day moving average of $25.39 and a 200-day moving average of $20.73. Five9, Inc. has a one year low of $13.29 and a one year high of $34.58. Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, August 6th. The software maker reported $0.70 earnings per share for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $0.68 by $0.02. Five9 had a net margin of 4.94% and a return on equity of 12.92%. The business had revenue of $312.44 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $306.61 million. During the same period in the prior year, the business posted $0.76 earnings per share. Five9’s revenue was up 10.3% compared to the same quarter last year. Five9 has set its Q3 2026 guidance at 0.770-0.810 EPS and its FY 2026 guidance at 3.220-3.300 EPS. On average, sell-side analysts forecast that Five9, Inc. will post 1.55 earnings per share for the current year.
Analyst Ratings Changes A number of equities analysts have commented on the company. Truist Financial boosted their price objective on Five9 from $23.00 to $35.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, August 7th. Weiss Ratings upgraded Five9 from a “sell (d+)” rating to a “hold (c-)” rating in a research note on Friday, August 7th. Wall Street Zen cut Five9 from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Saturday, August 8th. DA Davidson upped their price target on shares of Five9 from $22.00 to $28.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a research report on Monday, August 10th. Finally, Barclays increased their price objective on shares of Five9 from $25.00 to $34.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Monday, August 10th. Ten investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and eight have assigned a Hold rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $31.50.
View Our Latest Stock Report on FIVN
Five9 Company Profile (Free Report)
Five9, Inc (NASDAQ: FIVN) is a leading provider of cloud-based contact center software designed to help organizations manage customer interactions across voice, email, chat, social media and other digital channels. Its platform offers features such as intelligent routing, analytics, workforce optimization and integrated customer relationship management (CRM) connectors. The company emphasizes AI-driven capabilities, including virtual agents and predictive dialing, to enhance both agent productivity and customer experience.
Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Ramon, California, Five9 completed its initial public offering in February 2014.
Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than Five9 Bloom Energy’s AI Surge Meets a Valuation Reality Check Target Is Winning Shoppers Back—Can the Rally Reach $180? IonQ’s Space Contract Points to a New Frontier for Quantum Investors Is Apple’s AI Strategy Smarter Than Skeptics Think?
Receive News & Ratings for Five9 Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Five9 and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Tap Global vzrostl o 18 % poté, co tržby za rok do 30. června dosáhly přibližně 3 milionů GBP, asi o 7 % nad očekáváním trhu. Ztráta EBITDA činila kolem 260 tisíc GBP, výrazně méně než očekávaných 1,3 milionu GBP.
Tap Global Group PLC (LSE:TAP), the AIM-listed digital finance company, saw its shares rise 18% to 1.30pt, up from a previous close of 1.10p, after it reported stronger-than-expected revenue and a sharp narrowing of its operating loss.
The shares opened at 1.20p, compared with a previous close of 1.10p, before reaching 1.30p, according to London Stock Exchange data.
Tap reported revenue of approximately £3 million for the year ended 30 June, about 7% above market expectations, despite cryptocurrency exchange volumes falling by more than half during the year.
The group’s adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) loss was approximately £260,000, about 80% lower than market expectations of £1.3 million, while its group EBITDA loss was about £55,000.
Tap said it was EBITDA-profitable in the second half of the financial year, marking an improvement as the company moved towards its stated goal of sustained profitability.
The company’s Tap Earn product, launched in May, also showed strong early growth, with assets under management reaching more than $5.6 million, up 61% in three months.
Tap Earn has delivered 15 consecutive weekly payouts and generated approximately $125,000 in yield revenue, equivalent to an annualised gross yield of about 7% on committed capital.
Customer deposits have reached $6.9 million since launch, compared with withdrawals of approximately $700,000, indicating that deposits have significantly exceeded withdrawals.
Tap had more than 400,000 registered users at 30 June, compared with about 391,000 a year earlier, while cash and cryptoassets totalled £2.15 million.
The company said its financial year 2026 performance demonstrated the resilience of its fee-based model during a difficult cryptocurrency market, while financial year 2027 would focus on scaling and sustained profitability.
No Investment Advice
This content is published by Proactive Investors Limited and made available subject to the terms and conditions of use of its website (see Terms of Use).
Proactive Investors is a full-service financial newswire. We produce independent, objective financial journalism and do not provide personalised investment advice, act as a broker, or recommend specific securities to individual investors.
Financial content published on this Site is produced under the journalist exemption provided for in Article 20 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, and in accordance with FCA guidance at PERG 8.12. Where a communication is not otherwise exempt, it is issued or approved for distribution in the UK by Proactive Investors Limited.
All information used in the preparation of this communication has been compiled from publicly available sources that we believe to be reliable, however, we cannot, and do not, guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.
This communication is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a personal recommendation, an offer, solicitation, or inducement to buy or sell any investment or financial product. Opinions and commentary reflect the views of the named author at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice.
This communication has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. Before entering into any transaction, investors should consider suitability for their individual circumstances and should read the relevant prospectus, term sheet, subscription agreement, information memorandum, prospectus or other offering document in full.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of investments can fall as well as rise, and you may not recover the amount you invest.
This communication may contain information obtained from third parties, including credit ratings and financial data. Reproduction and distribution of third-party content in any form is prohibited except with the prior written consent of the relevant third party. Credit ratings are statements of opinion and should not be relied upon as investment advice.
GBP/USD surged to 1.3613 on Wednesday, reaching a three-month high. Investors are digesting fresh UK inflation and labour market data.
Consumer inflation accelerated to 2.9% in July, up from 2.6% in June and in line with forecasts. Core inflation held steady at 2.6%. Following the release, markets slightly scaled back expectations of a Bank of England rate hike before year-end.
Earlier labour market data showed unemployment holding at 4.9%, above expectations, while the number of payrolled employees fell by 86,000 year-on-year. Meanwhile, growth in regular pay remained fairly stable at 3.5%.
Additional support for the pound is coming from a weaker dollar. Soft US economic data have led investors to reduce expectations of further Federal Reserve tightening. At the same time, elevated oil prices and uncertainty surrounding the US–Iran conflict continue to pose inflation risks for the UK.
Technical analysis
On the H4 GBP/USD chart, a wide consolidation range is forming around the 1.3523 level. The market has moved towards its upper boundary. A new compact consolidation range is expected to form below 1.3631. A downside breakout from this range would open the way for a move lower towards 1.3500. The MACD supports this scenario, with its signal line above zero and beginning to turn downwards.
On the H1 chart, the market has formed a compact consolidation range around the 1.3607 level, currently extending between 1.3588 and 1.3618. A move lower towards 1.3572 is expected, followed by a move higher to 1.3600. The Stochastic oscillator confirms this scenario, with its signal line below 80 and trending downward towards 20, indicating short-term downside pressure.
ConclusionGBP/USD has climbed to a three-month high, supported by a weaker dollar and UK economic data that largely met expectations. Inflation accelerated to 2.9% in July, while core inflation held steady, prompting markets to slightly lower BoE rate hike expectations. Labour market data showed unemployment above forecasts and a decline in payroll employment, though wage growth remained stable. The dollar remains under pressure from soft US data, which has reduced Fed tightening expectations. However, elevated oil prices and geopolitical uncertainty continue to pose inflation risks for the UK. Technically, the pair may see a short-term pullback towards 1.3572, with potential for a further decline to 1.3500. The near-term direction will depend on upcoming economic releases and central bank signals.
The holders of JitoSOL have achieved the necessary governance quorum, enabling the Jito Stake Pool to cast a decisive YES vote on three active Solana governance proposals. This development involves approximately 10 million SOL being used to influence protocol governance, marking a significant step for JitoSOL holders in participating in Solana’s decision-making processes. The quorum was reached under the JIP-30 trigger mechanism, which allows the stake pool to reflect the collective vote of JitoSOL holders once the threshold is met, thereby integrating liquid staking token holders into Solana’s governance framework.
Advertisement
The move appears to reflect a growing trend of liquid staking tokens playing a crucial role in blockchain governance. By involving JitoSOL holders in decision-making, the initiative could enhance engagement and confidence in the Solana ecosystem. The market response to this development suggests a positive outlook, potentially impacting Solana’s market dynamics and price trajectory.
Key Takeaways The move appears to integrate JitoSOL holders into Solana’s governance, suggesting increased community involvement. JitoSOL’s governance mechanism indicates strong support for the current Solana proposals, potentially impacting market sentiment. The development could indicate a shift in the governance role of liquid staking tokens within the Solana ecosystem. What to Watch The effects of this governance decision on Solana’s market dynamics will be crucial in the coming days. Observers should monitor Solana’s price movements and any subsequent governance outcomes. Additionally, further integration of liquid staking tokens into other blockchain governance frameworks could indicate a broader trend, potentially influencing market confidence and participation.
Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.
Term Structure
Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h September 1 2026 0.2% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.9% — — View market → September 1 2026 1% — — View market → September 1 2026 1.8% — — View market → September 1 2026 16.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 60.9% — — View market → September 1 2026 7% — — View market → September 1 2026 1.7% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.3% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.1% — — View market → September 1 2026 0.7% — — View market →
WD-40 uvedla, že klade důraz na mezinárodní expanzi, prémiové formáty, řadu Specialist a digitální kanály. E-commerce zatím tvoří méně než 10 % tržeb, ale letos vzrostl o 22 %.
Why WD-40 Is Proving Great Businesses Never Go Out of StyleWD-40 NASDAQ: WDFC outlined its long-term growth strategy, supply-chain approach and capital-allocation priorities during a Water Tower Research fireside chat, with management emphasizing international expansion, premium product formats, digital capabilities and specialist maintenance products.
Get WD-40 alerts:
President and CEO Steve Brass said the company’s long-term growth algorithm targets mid- to high-single-digit maintenance product sales growth, gross margin above 55%, and EBITDA growth that exceeds sales growth. The strategy is organized around four “must-win battles,” including expanding WD-40 Multi-Use Product geographically, premiumizing its product mix, growing the WD-40 Specialist line and expanding digital capabilities.
International Markets Drive Expansion Opportunity WD-40 Company Justifies Sell-Side Support With Q2 ResultsBrass said the United States provides a stable base for global expansion, representing about 35% of global sales. The company’s U.S. maintenance-products business has posted a compound annual growth rate of roughly 6% to 7% over the past five years, he said, while U.S. sales increased by approximately $55 million over that period.
International markets account for about 65% of the business, and the WD-40 brand is available in 176 countries and territories, according to Brass. The company is focused on its top 20 global growth opportunities.
WD-40 Stock Sank After Earnings—Here Are 5 Reasons Bulls Aren’t WorriedLatin America has approximately tripled over the past five to six years, Brass said. Meanwhile, the company’s direct European markets—including the U.K., France, Germany, Spain and Italy—generate about 30% of total business and have delivered single-digit to high-single-digit growth, with occasional double-digit gains.
China is WD-40’s largest growth opportunity and its third-largest market globally after the U.S. and France, Brass said. The company operates a direct China business with about 60 employees and is generating double-digit growth there. India is the company’s second-largest opportunity, with sales growth above 20% through its partnership with local company Pidilite. India is already WD-40’s second-largest market by unit volume, Brass said.
Premium Formats and Specialist Products CFO Sara Hyzer said premiumization centers on improving the end-user experience through formats such as the WD-40 Smart Straw and EZ-REACH products. Smart Straw addresses the issue of users losing the straw included with the classic can, while EZ-REACH includes a flexible straw intended to help users access difficult-to-reach areas.
Sales of the two premium formats combined rose 19% year to date and represented about 50% of WD-40 Multi-Use Product sales, Hyzer said. By unit volume, premium formats accounted for about 40% of global Multi-Use Product sales, leaving what management views as a significant runway for further adoption.
Premium formats account for roughly 80% of sales in developed markets such as the U.S., compared with low-single-digit penetration in some emerging markets. Hyzer said WD-40 is nearing the availability of manufacturing capacity in China that would allow it to introduce Smart Straw products in China and Asian distributor markets.
Smart Straw sells at about a 30% uplift to the classic can. EZ-REACH sells at about a 45% uplift to the classic can. The company targets 10% annual growth for the premium formats. Brass said the WD-40 Specialist line, which includes products such as high-performance penetrants, high-temperature lubricants, silicone sprays and cleaners and degreasers, is the company’s fastest-growing range. The sub-brand has grown at a compound annual rate of about 14%, he said.
The company sees an identified growth opportunity of around $600 million for Specialist products. Brass said about 90% of Specialist sales currently come from 10 countries, creating an opportunity to expand the line into additional markets where the core WD-40 brand is already established.
Digital Growth, Margins and Supply Chain Hyzer described digital as an accelerant for the company’s broader strategy rather than a standalone channel effort. E-commerce remains less than 10% of sales but is WD-40’s fastest-growing channel, with year-to-date e-commerce sales up 22%, led by the U.S. and China.
The company sells entirely through retail, online pure-play and omnichannel partners rather than directly to consumers. Hyzer said WD-40 is investing in product content, search, availability, ratings and reviews, while also using social media, influencers, video and digital education to explain product uses and premium-format benefits.
On costs, Hyzer said roughly 30% to 35% of the cost of a WD-40 can is subject to monthly spot-price volatility, primarily related to specialty chemicals such as solvents and base oils. Tinplate cans and manufacturing fees are generally governed by longer-term contracts.
The company expects some near-term gross-margin pressure from input costs and included a full-year gross-margin expectation of 54.5% to 55.5% in its recent guidance. WD-40 has taken price actions in Europe and Asia and is evaluating whether further actions are needed, Hyzer said.
Brass said WD-40 uses a decentralized supply chain with approximately 20 external manufacturing partners globally. The company is opening manufacturing in Thailand to add capacity in Asia-Pacific, where it already manufactures in China and Australia. Management said localized production helps provide flexibility and mitigate tariff exposure.
Capital Returns and CFO Transition Hyzer said the company’s first capital-allocation priority is reinvesting in brands, people, digital capabilities, supply-chain resilience and productivity. Capital expenditures are targeted at approximately 1% to 2% of net sales due to the company’s outsourced manufacturing and distribution model.
WD-40 has paid dividends without interruption for more than 40 years, Hyzer said, and targets annual dividends of about 50% of net income. The company also uses share repurchases, spending $22.5 million on buybacks through the third quarter. Its board recently authorized a new share-repurchase plan of up to $100 million beginning next fiscal year.
Brass also said Hyzer is expected to transition from CFO to president of the Americas, a region representing about 45% of global revenue. The company is conducting an external search for an experienced public-company CFO, with Hyzer expected to leave the CFO role around early November and a successor hoped to begin at that time.
About WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC)WD-40 Company, headquartered in San Diego, California, is best known for its flagship WD-40® Multi-Use Product, a water-displacing spray used for lubrication, rust prevention and cleaning. Since its introduction in 1953 by the Rocket Chemical Company, the WD-40 brand has become a household and industrial staple. Over time, the company has broadened its portfolio to include complementary maintenance and cleaning brands such as 3-IN-ONE® oils, Lava® hand cleaners, Solvol® solvents, Spot Shot® stain removers and X-14® cleaning products.
WD-40 Company distributes its products in more than 176 countries through retail, industrial and automotive channels.
This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Continue following MarketBeat
Add MarketBeat as your preferred source on Google to see our latest stories in your feed.
Should You Invest $1,000 in WD-40 Right Now?Before you consider WD-40, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and WD-40 wasn't on the list.
While WD-40 currently has a Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI boom is creating opportunities across semiconductors, cloud computing, enterprise software, infrastructure, cybersecurity, and automation.
Inside this report, you’ll find 10 companies positioned to benefit as artificial intelligence moves from hype to real-world deployment and becomes a core growth driver for corporate America.
Poradce hry Shiba Eternity a dlouholetý člen komunity Mazrael varoval před falešnými oznámeními o migraci na Telegramu a uvedl, že nyní neprobíhá žádná migrace. Podvodné zprávy cílí na držitele SHIB, BONE, LEASH a TREAT.
Scammers have been spreading false information about token migrations within the Shiba Inu ecosystem, prompting warnings from Shiba Eternity game advisor and long-standing community member Mazrael. The alerts come as fraudulent narratives begin circulating on Telegram channels, targeting holders of SHIB, BONE, LEASH, and TREAT tokens.
Warning over fraudulent migration claimsMazrael, who plays a key advisory role in the official Shiba Inu mobile game, stated that individuals are using Telegram to mislead community members about supposed token migrations. He highlighted one specific account with the alias ‘someonesmart’ for broadcasting a fake migration campaign across multiple Telegram groups, including those dedicated to Bone ShibaSwap and Shibarium.
The scammer reportedly posted unauthorized links and group invitations in official community channels, muting moderators and banning developers to prevent them from addressing the fraudulent messages immediately. Mazrael made it clear that these groups and messages have no connection with ShibaSwap or the Shibarium project.
Mazrael emphasized that the group promoted by ‘someonesmart’ had “nothing to do with ShibaSwap or Shibarium,” warning users to avoid any migration claims from unofficial sources.
He further clarified that, as of now, “No migration is taking place,” and reminded users planning to stake BONE on Shibarium or interact with ShibaSwap to use only the real tokens and avoid offers of supposed replacement tokens.
Official guidance and token safetyCommunity leaders are encouraging participants to rely solely on official channels and the legitimate tokens within the Shiba Inu ecosystem. These tokens include SHIB, BONE, LEASH, and TREAT. Users are advised to remain skeptical of any request involving unfamiliar contracts, swapping tokens due to supposed migrations, or moving assets to new addresses unless such actions are directly confirmed by official Shiba Inu sources.
“If you want to stake your BONE on Shibarium or use your real tokens on ShibaSwap, you use the real tokens,” Mazrael stated, reinforcing that no migration or token replacement is currently legitimate.
LEASH contract upgrade underwaySeparately, the development team is preparing for a planned migration of the LEASH token following the identification of a technical flaw in its original code. This vulnerability affected the token’s fixed-supply feature, raising concerns that supply could be changed through a rebase mechanism, even though developers had previously stated the contract keys had been burned.
After addressing the issue, developers confirmed that the new LEASH v2 contract cannot mint additional tokens under any circumstance. The entire supply of the v2 token has already been secured in a multisignature wallet, awaiting distribution.
The team explained that when the migration process begins, holders of the original LEASH (v1) will have their tokens locked or burned, while v2 tokens will be issued from the multisig wallet according to each investor’s holdings. However, the official date for this migration is yet to be announced, and no action is required from holders at this time.
Mini dictionary: Multisignature wallet, a type of cryptocurrency wallet that requires more than one private key to authorize a transaction, offering additional security by distributing control among multiple parties.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
Na Shibarium za 30 dní vzrostly poplatky o 79,5 % na 22,10 USD a TVL vyskočilo o 298 % na 97 453 USD. Aktivita v ekosystému SHIB tak roste rychleji než samotná cena SHIB.
Shibarium metrics surge even as SHIB price lagsShiba Inu's $SHIB token is trading at approximately $0.00000443, up around 7% over the past month but still a long way from the all-time highs set in October 2021. Price alone, however, is not the full story right now. The more notable movement is happening on Shibarium, the Layer 2 network built to scale the Shiba Inu ecosystem.
Over the past 30 days, on-chain fees on Shibarium have risen 79.5%, reaching $22.10. More strikingly, total value locked (TVL) on the protocol has jumped 298% over the same period, including a 287% increase in just one week, bringing TVL to $97,453. The figures come from DeFiLlama, one of the primary trackers for decentralised finance data across blockchain networks.
Context matters: a small but accelerating baseThe absolute numbers remain modest. For context, a recent report from The Crypto Basic noted that Shibarium's TVL stood at $25,273 as recently as August 10 , which makes the move to nearly $97,500 within days a meaningful percentage gain even if the overall pool is still small. Separate data from Coin-Turk, published August 15, put Shibarium's TVL at $102,324 , broadly consistent with the upward trend shown in DeFiLlama's figures.
Activity on the transaction side has also picked up. On August 9, Shibarium processed around 4,480 transactions, a 507% jump from the lows recorded just days earlier , with blockchain trackers flagging it as a one-month high. Data from Shibariumscan shows the Layer 2 network has now processed 1.56 billion transactions since launching in August 2023, across roughly 269.93 million recorded addresses.
Analysts caution against reading too much into short-term spikes. Single-day surges can be inflated by bots, high-frequency wallets, or temporary programmes that dry up as quickly as they appear. The percentage gains on TVL and fees are also amplified by the small starting base. Still, the direction of travel across multiple metrics, fees, TVL, and transaction counts, points to rising engagement with the Shibarium ecosystem over recent weeks, even if the network remains a fraction of the size of leading Layer 2 platforms.
Shibarium uses BONE as its gas token, tying network activity directly to BONE demand for transaction fees. SHIB itself does not function as the gas currency, meaning the token's utility is more indirect, linked to broader ecosystem participation and any burn dynamics that follow from network usage.
Whether the current momentum can be sustained remains to be seen, but the data suggests on-chain activity and capital flowing into Shibarium are growing at a faster pace than the token price alone would imply.
Sources:
DeFiLlama: Shibarium chain data
The Crypto Basic: Shibarium transactions surge 507%
Coin-Turk: Shibarium DEX volume and TVL, August 2026
Shiba Inu (SHIB) za posledních 24 hodin zaznamenal 14,86% nárůst objemu transakcí, zatímco velcí držitelé stahovali miliardy SHIB z burz do cold walletů.
Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Over the past 24 hours, Shiba Inu (SHIB) on-chain activity recorded a sharp 14.86% surge in transfer volume, coinciding with a local drop in the token's price to $0.00000442.
Fresh data from CryptoQuant and Etherscan show that while retail investors watch the price decline, the largest holders are using this moment to withdraw billions of SHIB from trading platforms en masse.
You Might Also Like
HOT Stories
Blockchain metrics paint a rather anomalous picture: while daily growth in new wallets on the network is virtually zero (+0.004%), the volume of transferred tokens has surged, while the number of transactions itself has remained at its baseline level.
Daily transfer dynamics of Shiba Inu (SHIB) coin, Source: EtherscanThis means that it was not millions of small sums moving through the network, but several enormous, undivided blocks of capital.
How 740 major players are emptying SHIB exchange order booksThe reason for this dynamic is that Shiba Inu is extremely centralized: just 740 whale wallets control a colossal 94.57% of the coin's entire circulating supply. At the same time, nearly one million small investors with balances of up to $10 collectively own just 0.05% of the SHIB supply.
Retail addresses are practically incapable of moving the network's overall metrics by even one percentage point.
The on-chain trail of this activity leads to the largest liquidity hubs — the internal addresses of Robinhood, which holds 3.92% of the supply, Binance with 3.45% and Crypto.com with 2.75%.
CryptoQuant's Exchange Netflow chart clarifies the motive behind these movements: deep outflows from trading platforms were recorded on Aug. 17 and 18, with the net exchange balance falling by roughly 46.7 billion SHIB at the beginning of current week alone.
Total Shiba Inu (SHIB) exchange netflow, Source: CryptoQuant You Might Also Like
Large players are not transferring tokens to exchanges to sell them. On the contrary, they are removing supply from the market by moving billions of SHIB to cold wallets.
For the millions of small investors, this surge in transfers has yet to become a signal for the start of a retail rally.
However, the network has sent a clear signal: the 740 whales that fully control this asset are methodically buying up the supply and moving tokens off the market, possibly laying the groundwork for a breakout from the prolonged sideways trend.
UEX.US zalistovala Shiba Inu (SHIB) a otevřela obchodování proti USDT i nákup přes PayPal, bankovní převod a kartu. Současně SHIB drží support u $0.0000043 a obchoduje se kolem $0.000004461.
Crypto exchange UEX.US has announced the listing of Shiba Inu (SHIB), giving users another avenue to trade and access financial services tied to the meme coin.
According to the exchange, users can now trade Shiba Inu against USDT and other major assets. In addition, they can purchase the token through PayPal, bank wire transfers, or card payments.
Moreover, UEX.US has introduced a 4.5% APY Savings Rewards rate for SHIB from the first day. The platform also allows users to borrow up to 90% of their SHIB holdings without selling their tokens.
The listing expands SHIB’s reach among exchange users and adds another trading venue for the asset. Notably, the announcement comes about a week after Australian-based exchange FrameEx listed SHIB, after which the token briefly climbed to $0.00001004.
SHIB Shows Signs of a Modest Recovery Meanwhile, SHIB is showing signs of recovery after finding support around $0.0000043 earlier this week. It is currently trading at $0.000004461, while several market indicators pointed to improving sentiment.
For instance, Santiment’s Social Dominance metric has recovered since August 16, reaching 0.016% at press time. This increase suggests that SHIB-related discussions are gaining prominence across cryptocurrency conversations.
Shiba Inu Social Dominance Chart Derivatives data also offers a more constructive outlook. CoinGlass data showed SHIB’s long-to-short ratio at 1.01. Since the ratio sits slightly above one, long positions marginally outnumber short positions, indicating that traders are becoming more optimistic about SHIB’s near-term direction.
Furthermore, SHIB’s funding rate turned positive on Tuesday and climbed to 0.0087% on Wednesday. Positive funding generally means traders holding long positions are paying those holding shorts, signaling stronger demand for bullish exposure.
SHIB funding rates chart $0.0000043 Support Remains Critical From a technical perspective, SHIB’s ability to hold above $0.0000043 could determine whether its latest recovery develops into a stronger rebound.
The token retested this support zone yesterday and attracted buyers around the level. It subsequently moved back above $0.0000044, suggesting that selling pressure may be easing. If SHIB continues to hold $0.0000043, its next potential target is the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), currently around $0.0000046.
Momentum indicators also provide some encouragement. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stood near the neutral 50 level at 46, indicating that bearish momentum is weakening without yet confirming a strong bullish reversal. Meanwhile, the MACD’s declining red histogram bars point to fading downside momentum.
SHIB/USDT daily chart However, the recovery remains vulnerable. A daily close below $0.0000043 could invalidate the immediate bullish setup and expose SHIB to further losses towards the psychological $0.0000040 level.
DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.
EUR/USD vystoupal na tříměsíční maximum 1,1693, protože dolar oslabil po oznámení amerického ministerstva financí o zdvojnásobení odkupu dlouhodobých dluhopisů. Analytici vidí prostor k růstu k 1,1800.
The Euro (EUR) posts a fresh three-month high at around 1.1693 against the US Dollar (USD) during the European trading session on Thursday. The major currency pair strengthens as the US Dollar takes a hit due to plunging United States (US) long-dated bond yields after the Treasury Department’s announcement that it will double down on its bond-buying operations to curb higher borrowing costs.
Strategists at Danske Bank note that EUR/USD “spiked higher” after the US Treasury announced an increase in buyback volumes of longer-dated Treasury bonds, a move that coincided with a flattening of the US yield curve. They highlight that the 10Y UST, at “4.64% currently, … is now 10bp below the peak on Tuesday,” and that the adjustment in US yields has “only partly spilled over to Europe, where the primary market has opened with plenty of SSA and covered bond deals.”
In the European session, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, extends its decline and posts a fresh 11-week low near 98.70.
US Dollar Price Today The table below shows the percentage change of US Dollar (USD) against listed major currencies today. US Dollar was the weakest against the New Zealand Dollar.
USDEURGBPJPYCADAUDNZDCHFUSD-0.15%-0.17%0.16%-0.24%-0.01%-0.33%0.15%EUR0.15%-0.02%0.30%-0.08%0.13%-0.19%0.30%GBP0.17%0.02%0.32%-0.07%0.15%-0.15%0.32%JPY-0.16%-0.30%-0.32%-0.40%-0.17%-0.50%-0.01%CAD0.24%0.08%0.07%0.40%0.24%-0.08%0.39%AUD0.01%-0.13%-0.15%0.17%-0.24%-0.31%0.16%NZD0.33%0.19%0.15%0.50%0.08%0.31%0.50%CHF-0.15%-0.30%-0.32%0.01%-0.39%-0.16%-0.50% The heat map shows percentage changes of major currencies against each other. The base currency is picked from the left column, while the quote currency is picked from the top row. For example, if you pick the US Dollar from the left column and move along the horizontal line to the Japanese Yen, the percentage change displayed in the box will represent USD (base)/JPY (quote).
On the Euro front, financial markets are confident that the European Central Bank (ECB) will raise interest rates at the September meeting. In contrast, the Federal Reserve (Fed) is expected to leave them steady in the same month.
EUR/USD Technical Analysis
EUR/USD trades at 1.1693, extending its advance above the 20-period exponential moving average (EMA) at 1.1547. The pair’s position comfortably above this short-term trend indicator suggests a constructive near-term bias, though the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 73.98 signals overbought conditions that could cap upside in the very short run.
On the downside, initial support is located at the 20-day EMA around 1.1547, where a pullback would likely be tested before any deeper correction unfolds. Looking up, the pair could advance towards May's high at around 1.1800 once it stabilizes above 1.1700.
Analysts at UOB Group are also constructive on the pair in the near-term horizon, recalling that they “turned positive on Monday (17 Aug, spot at 1.1570), indicating that ‘the price action suggests EUR is likely to trade with an upside bias.’” On Tuesday (18 Aug, spot at 1.1580), they maintained that “while the upside bias remains intact, given that there is no significant increase in upward momentum, EUR must break and hold above 1.1615 before a move to 1.1655 and beyond can be expected.” That condition was met yesterday as EUR “broke above 1.1615, as it rallied sharply to 1.1679,” with the pair closing “at a three-month high of 1.1677, up by 0.89%.”
UOB now judges that, “given the strong momentum, there is room for further upside in EUR toward 1.1725,” and will “maintain our positive EUR view as long as it stays above 1.1600 (‘strong support’ level previously at 1.1525).”
(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool. Know more.)
US Dollar FAQs The US Dollar (USD) is the official currency of the United States of America, and the ‘de facto’ currency of a significant number of other countries where it is found in circulation alongside local notes. It is the most heavily traded currency in the world, accounting for over 88% of all global foreign exchange turnover, or an average of $6.6 trillion in transactions per day, according to data from 2022. Following the second world war, the USD took over from the British Pound as the world’s reserve currency. For most of its history, the US Dollar was backed by Gold, until the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1971 when the Gold Standard went away.
The most important single factor impacting on the value of the US Dollar is monetary policy, which is shaped by the Federal Reserve (Fed). The Fed has two mandates: to achieve price stability (control inflation) and foster full employment. Its primary tool to achieve these two goals is by adjusting interest rates. When prices are rising too quickly and inflation is above the Fed’s 2% target, the Fed will raise rates, which helps the USD value. When inflation falls below 2% or the Unemployment Rate is too high, the Fed may lower interest rates, which weighs on the Greenback.
In extreme situations, the Federal Reserve can also print more Dollars and enact quantitative easing (QE). QE is the process by which the Fed substantially increases the flow of credit in a stuck financial system. It is a non-standard policy measure used when credit has dried up because banks will not lend to each other (out of the fear of counterparty default). It is a last resort when simply lowering interest rates is unlikely to achieve the necessary result. It was the Fed’s weapon of choice to combat the credit crunch that occurred during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. It involves the Fed printing more Dollars and using them to buy US government bonds predominantly from financial institutions. QE usually leads to a weaker US Dollar.
Quantitative tightening (QT) is the reverse process whereby the Federal Reserve stops buying bonds from financial institutions and does not reinvest the principal from the bonds it holds maturing in new purchases. It is usually positive for the US Dollar.
Binance po posledním přezkumu stáhne všechny spotové obchodní páry pro ICON (ICX), Secret (SCRT) a Storj (STORJ). Vyřazení z obchodování proběhne 3. září 2026 v 06:00 TSI.
Binance, yaptığı son değerlendirmelerin ardından üç altcoin için spot işlem çiftlerini platformdan kaldırma kararı aldı. Borsanın açıklamasına göre ICON (ICX), Secret (SCRT) ve Storj (STORJ) için tüm spot işlem çiftleri 3 Eylül 2026 tarihinde saat 06.00 TSI itibarıyla delist edilecek. Kararın ardından yatırımcıların bu altcoinlerdeki işlemlerini ve varlıklarını dikkatle takip etmesi önem taşıyor. Binance gibi yüksek işlem hacmine sahip bir borsada spot işlem desteğinin sona ermesi, ilgili tokenların likiditesi ve kısa vadeli fiyat hareketleri üzerinde baskı oluşturabilecek önemli bir gelişme olarak değerlendiriliyor.
Binance Futures (Vadeli İşlemler) %10 İndirimli İşlem Yapmak İçin Tıkla!
Binance ICX, SCRT ve STORJ’u Delist Edecek Binance, düzenli inceleme süreci kapsamında ICX, SCRT ve STORJ tokenlarını yeniden değerlendirdi. Yapılan son değerlendirmenin ardından borsa, bu üç altcoinin tüm spot işlem çiftlerini platformdan kaldırma kararı aldı. Delist işlemi 3 Eylül 2026 saat 06.00 TSI’de gerçekleştirilecek. Bu tarihten itibaren Binance kullanıcıları ICX, SCRT ve STORJ için ilgili spot işlem çiftlerinde yeni alım veya satım işlemi gerçekleştiremeyecek.
İlginizi Çekebilir: Bitcoin 70 Bin Dolara Yükseldi: Kısa Pozisyonlarda Rekor Tasfiye!
Binance tarafından gerçekleştirilen delist işlemleri, ilgili tokenların likiditesi ve yatırımcı ilgisi açısından önemli sonuçlar doğurabilir. Büyük bir kripto para borsasında işlem çiftlerinin kaldırılması, piyasadaki işlem hacminin azalmasına ve fiyat hareketliliğinin artmasına neden olabilir. Bu nedenle ICX, SCRT ve STORJ yatırımcılarının Binance tarafından açıklanan delist tarihini ve işlem süreçlerini yakından takip etmesi önem taşıyor.
ICON (ICX) Secret (SCRT) Storj (STORJ) Söz konusu tokenların Binance üzerindeki tüm spot işlem çiftleri 3 Eylül 2026 itibarıyla kapatılacak. Bu tarihten sonra yatırımcılar ilgili spot işlem çiftlerinde alım ve satım gerçekleştiremeyecek. Bu nedenle ICX, SCRT ve STORJ sahiplerinin delist tarihini ve Binance tarafından yapılacak olası ek duyuruları yakından takip etmesi önem taşıyor.
Değerlendirme Binance’in ICX, SCRT ve STORJ için aldığı delist kararı, üç altcoin açısından önemli bir gelişme olarak öne çıkıyor. 3 Eylül 2026 itibarıyla spot işlemlerin sona erecek olması, yatırımcıların bu tarihe kadar ilgili işlemlerini ve hesaplarındaki varlıkları dikkatle takip etmesini gerektiriyor. Delist kararının ardından söz konusu tokenlarda işlem hacmi ve likidite azalabilirken, fiyat hareketliliğinin de artması mümkün. Bu nedenle yatırımcıların Binance tarafından yapılacak yeni açıklamaları yakından takip etmesi önem taşıyor.
Son dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.
Konu ile ilgili yorumlarınızı bize yazabilirsiniz. Ayrıca, bu tarz bilgilendirici içeriklerin devamının gelmesini isterseniz, bizleri Telegram, Youtube ve Twitter kanallarımızdan takip edebilirsiniz.
The Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate jumped above 1.3600 on Wednesday, reaching its strongest level since May as falling Treasury yields hit the US Dollar.
Pound Sterling's own UK inflation backdrop was broadly neutral.
Latest — Exchange Rates:
Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD): 1.360955 (+0.55%)
Euro to Dollar (EUR/USD): 1.167557 (+0.86%)
Dollar to Yen (USD/JPY): 158.12827 (-0.89%)
DAILY RECAP:
GBP/USD climbed around 0.5% as the Dollar sold off sharply across the major currencies.
The decisive move came after the US Treasury announced it would double buybacks of longer-dated government bonds, sending 10 and 30-year yields lower and easing financial conditions.
Deutsche Bank strategist George Saravelos warned that failure by the Federal Reserve to recognise that effect would amount to “an additional dollar negative driver.”
The subsequent FOMC minutes were more hawkish.
Several policymakers had been prepared to raise rates in July, while many judged that another increase would be needed if inflation failed to return towards target.
Markets largely looked through that message following softer jobs, inflation and retail sales data released since the meeting.
ING's Chris Turner said: “Our base case is that it does not, and the dollar softens a little,” referring to the prospect of a September Fed hike.
Scotiabank remains similarly cautious on the US currency, stating: “We remain bearish on the outlook for the USD in the short/medium term.”
Pound Sterling had earlier shown little reaction to UK inflation.
Headline CPI rose as expected to 2.9%, while services inflation eased to 3.4% and producer input prices dropped 1.7%.
Those figures, combined with Tuesday's softer labour data, leave the Bank of England with little urgency to raise rates again.
Near-Term GBP/USD Forecast: 1.3650 in Focus After Dollar Sell-Off Thursday brings US jobless claims, forecast at 210,000, alongside the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index.
Friday is busier for Sterling. UK retail sales are forecast to fall 0.5%, before manufacturing and services PMIs at 09:30 BST.
US flash PMIs follow at 14:45 BST.
Strong UK activity alongside softer US figures could push GBP/USD through 1.3650 and expose 1.3700.
Weak UK retail sales combined with resilient US data would put 1.3500 back in view.
The broader Pound to Dollar exchange rate (GBP/USD) remains constructive while the pair holds above the low-1.35 area.
Exchange Rates UK Research Our currency coverage draws on live market data, official economic releases and published bank research.
Alibaba reports June-quarter results on Thursday with investors looking to its cloud business to end a four-quarter run of earnings disappointments.
The company will release results before the US market opens, followed by a conference call at 7:30 a.m. ET.
Alibaba enters the print with renewed enthusiasm around Qwen and cloud computing, but a tougher test: whether rapid AI growth is becoming profitable enough to offset weaker Chinese consumption and heavy investment.
UBS and Jefferies expect group revenue growth of about 9%, up from 3% in the previous quarter, while UBS sees cloud revenue rising roughly 45%.
Cloud is now the clearest measure of whether Alibaba’s AI strategy is translating into commercial demand.
At the previous update, external cloud revenue growth accelerated to 40%, while AI-related product revenue posted triple-digit growth for an 11th consecutive quarter. That has raised expectations.
UBS analysts led by Kenneth Fong said investors were likely to “refocus on its valuable AI assets and AI growth angle,” according to the South China Morning Post.
UBS expects cloud revenue growth of about 45% and annual recurring revenue from AI model services of roughly 10 billion yuan.
Morgan Stanley analyst Gary Yu is bullish. TipRanks reported that Yu expects cloud growth of about 45% year on year, ahead of market expectations, with margins improving towards 11%.
However, Cloud remains smaller than Alibaba’s commerce operations, leaving the company exposed to China’s subdued consumer backdrop.
JD.com offered a reminder when its quarterly revenue fell 2.9% year on year, its first decline in more than a decade, despite beating analyst expectations.
Yu has flagged pressure in Alibaba’s core e-commerce business from soft consumption.
Citi analyst Alicia Yap expects weaker customer-management revenue after subdued retail sales and the 6.18 shopping festival.
Yap expects cloud revenue to grow about 45%, with cloud margins reaching roughly 11.5%. She also sees smaller quick-commerce losses and stronger cloud profitability helping offset weaker retail trends.
That is the earnings tension investors must resolve. Cloud is growing far faster than commerce, but commerce remains larger.
Alibaba therefore needs AI growth to become visible in group profits, not simply in headline growth percentages.
Alibaba has missed EPS expectations in four consecutive quarters, making another respectable report unlikely to reset sentiment on its own.
Investors will be watching three areas: whether cloud growth reaches the roughly 45% level expected by major brokers, whether cloud margins improve as AI demand scales, and whether quick-commerce losses continue narrowing.
Barclays has positioned for upside. The bank recommended call spreads ahead of earnings, citing accelerating cloud growth, AI recurring revenue exceeding targets, faster improvement in quick-commerce losses and stabilising core-commerce profitability.
The options market was pricing an earnings move of about 6%, below Alibaba’s six-quarter average realised move of 7.6%.
Walmart is expected to report fiscal second-quarter earnings before the bell on Thursday and offer its latest read on the health of the U.S. consumer.
The retailer, which has been leaning into prioritizing value for its lower-income cohort while winning over more high-income shoppers, has been largely insulated from macroeconomic pressures. However, the company has previously said it's seeing the divide between income groups widen.
As the largest U.S. retailer, Walmart can offer a unique perspective on consumer behavior.
Here's how the company is expected to perform, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:
Earnings per share: 74 cents expectedRevenue: $186.77 billion expectedLast quarter, the retailer issued a worse outlook than Wall Street expected for the year due to soaring gas prices and lower consumer confidence. Its fiscal first quarter was only the third time in 16 quarters that Walmart did not beat quarterly earnings expectations.
Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey previously told CNBC he believed higher tax refunds may have "muted" some of the pressure on consumers during the first few months of the year.
"It's something that we're keeping a close eye on, but that expectation is built into our guidance for the second quarter," Rainey said at the time.
Analysts at Bernstein wrote in a late July note that they believe Walmart is experiencing a slowdown in comparable sales due to "the lapping of tariff-driven price increases," which helped to increase revenue.
"This, combined with price cut talks from grocers, weak read-across from peers and ongoing inflationary pressure on the low-income consumer has created an elevated level of uncertainty," they wrote.
Nonetheless, the analysts said they still see Walmart in "a strong fundamental position" with its pricing, assortment and delivery.
The retailer is also expected to offer some color on how tariff refunds shaped its business in the quarter.
Competitor Target said on Wednesday that its quarterly results included a $752 million boost to net earnings, or $1.65 per share, from tariff refunds. Home improvement retailers Home Depot and Lowe's also reported increases to earnings from those refunds, with Home Depot adding that $685 million of its refunds were used to reduce the cost of goods sold.
United Wholesale Mortgage ve 2. čtvrtletí vykázala ztrátu 451,9 mil. USD, zrušila dividendu a získala 2,05 mld. USD od Oaktree Capital. Slabý trh s bydlením a vyšší sazby dál tlačí na nové úvěry.
The second quarter of 2026 was not kind to United Wholesale Mortgage (UWMC +3.47%). It posted a massive quarterly loss, eliminated its dividend, and got a cash infusion from Oaktree Capital. This is not a stock that risk-averse investors should be considering. And even more aggressive investors might want to tread with caution. And yet, United Wholesale Mortgage remains an industry giant in the mortgage space.
How bad was the second quarter? United Wholesale Mortgage posted a loss of $451.9 million in the second quarter. That was down from net income of $170.4 million in the first quarter and $314.5 million in the second quarter of 2025. Clearly not a good showing. Notably, loan originations were down sequentially from the first quarter and flat year over year. A big part of the problem is the weak housing market and rising interest rates, both of which work against the company.
Image source: Getty Images.
And yet, the company remains one of the largest mortgage loan originators in the United States. A key part of its business is that it doesn't deal directly with customers; instead, it provides mortgage brokers with the tools they need to make loans. Further, the company generally retains mortgage servicing rights to the loans that it eventually packages into bond-like securities and sells. Those servicing rights generate reliable cash flows. In some ways, the business model is appealing.
But that doesn't change the fact that the operating environment today is difficult. Notably, rising rates depress the value of mortgage servicing rights and mortgage loans, and reduce the volume of new loan originations. This helps explain the weak first quarter and the company's need to raise over $2 billion in capital from Oaktree Capital and SFS Group Capital. SFS Capital is a new investment vehicle created by the Ishbia Family. The CEO of United Wholesale Mortgage is Mat Ishbia, so there's an important connection here.
Today's Change
(
3.47
%) $
0.05
Current Price
$
1.49
Given the cash infusion and weak financial results, the company had little choice but to stop paying dividends. The stock, as you might expect, has been performing poorly, trading near its 52-week lows. This could realistically be a make-or-break situation. If the company can muddle through this rough patch, it could turn things around over the longer term. If it continues to struggle despite the financial backstop, buying the stock amid today's uncertainty could be a costly mistake.
Most investors should watch from the sidelines The risk-versus-reward balance with United Wholesale Mortgage is tilted toward risk right now. Only the most aggressive investors should consider it. To be fair, Oaktree Capital is a highly respected business partner. And the CEO is putting their money where their mouth is, given the CEO's family's involvement in the cash infusion. However, being a large mortgage lender in a weak housing market amid rising interest rates has clearly stretched the company's finances. The company is likely to struggle until the industry backdrop improves.