Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in IYRI over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 21:254mo ago
Is Now the Time to Invest in the TDIV ETF After Mainstay Capital Bought Shares Worth $94.8 Million?
This ETF targets dividend-paying technology and telecom stocks, offering index-based exposure to sector leaders with a focus on income.
What happenedAccording to a SEC filing dated December 09, 2025, Mainstay Capital Management LLC/ADV established a new position in First Trust Exchange-Traded Fund VI - First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV 3.05%), acquiring 961,923 shares. The estimated transaction value is $94.84 million, calculated using the average price during the quarter. The fund’s quarter-end position in TDIV was valued at $94.84 million, which includes both the purchase and subsequent price movements.
What else to knowThis is a new position for the fund, representing 9.51% of its 13F reportable assets under management as of September 30, 2025.Top holdings after the filing: NYSEMKT:SPMO: $165.16 million (16.6% of AUM)NASDAQ: TDIV: $94.84 million (9.5% of AUM)NYSEMKT:SPYG: $83.61 million (8.4% of AUM)NYSEMKT:QGRO: $73.66 million (7.4% of AUM)NYSEMKT:CGDV: $70.99 million (7.1% of AUM)NYSEMKT:GDE: $66.13 million (6.6% of AUM)As of December 9, 2025, TDIV shares were priced at $100.91, up 26.5% over one year; one-year alpha versus the S&P 500 was 13.13 percentage points.TDIV’s annualized dividend yield was 1.30% as of December 10, 2025; shares were 2.18% below their 52-week highETF overviewMetricValueAUM$3.7 billionDividend Yield1.30%Price (as of market close 2025-12-09)$100.911-Year Price Change26.52%ETF snapshotThe fund seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index, focusing on technology and telecommunications companies that pay regular dividends.Its portfolio consists of up to 100 dividend-paying technology and telecom equities, providing exposure to large-cap and mid-cap issuers in these sectors.The ETF is structured as a passively managed fund, with a non-diversified approach and a transparent, rules-based methodology that emphasizes income generation and sector allocation.First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) offers investors targeted access to dividend-paying technology and telecommunications companies through a transparent, index-based strategy.
The fund's approach combines sector-specific exposure with a focus on income, appealing to those seeking both growth and yield in the technology space. Its transparent, rules-based methodology aims to offer investors exposure to the technology and telecommunications sectors, focusing on regular dividend payers.
What this transaction means for investorsMainstay Capital Management initiating a position in the TDIV ETF is significant because it was a substantial buy, immediately catapulting the ETF to the second largest holding in the fund. The action suggests Mainstay Capital is bullish on TDIV.
The ETF is attractive considering it targets the tech and telecom sectors, two areas benefiting from the advent of artificial intelligence. The TDIV ETF stands to benefit from the tailwind of the AI market's expansion over the coming years, as businesses and governments around the world adopt AI.
Contributing to the growth from AI is TDIV's added focus on stocks that pay a dividend. This provides passive income, but of course, the dividend payout can change over time as companies increase, decrease, or even cut their dividends, as many did during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Still, while TDIV holds some risk, especially since the stocks in the ETF are concentrated in specific industries susceptible to high volatility, it seems Mainstay Capital sees the AI tailwind as a key factor in the attractiveness of this particular ETF, which could make now a good time to invest in TDIV.
Glossary13F reportable assets: Assets that institutional investment managers must disclose quarterly to the SEC, showing their equity holdings.
Assets under management (AUM): The total market value of investments managed on behalf of clients by a financial institution or fund.
Quarterly average pricing: The average price of a security over a specific quarter, used for estimating transaction values.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a security divided by its current price, expressed as a percentage.
Alpha: A measure of an investment's performance compared to a benchmark, showing excess return or outperformance.
ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): An investment fund traded on stock exchanges, holding a basket of assets like stocks or bonds.
Index-based strategy: An investment approach where a fund aims to replicate the performance of a specific market index.
Passively managed fund: A fund that tracks a market index rather than actively selecting investments, aiming to match index returns.
Non-diversified approach: A fund strategy that concentrates investments in fewer securities or sectors, increasing potential risk and reward.
Rules-based methodology: An investment process that follows predetermined, systematic criteria for selecting and weighting assets.
Dividend-paying equities: Stocks of companies that regularly distribute a portion of earnings to shareholders as dividends.
SummaryThe S&P 500 (SPY) is forecast to reach 7900 by end-2026, reflecting ongoing AI-driven investment and supportive fiscal and monetary policy.While echoes of the 1999 tech bubble are present, mega caps’ strong cash flows and steady earnings growth differentiate this cycle from the late 1990s.Fed policy is now accommodative, with disinflation and upgraded GDP forecasts supporting continued market strength outside tech.Risks include a premature AI bubble burst, but if that occurs, Value and Small Cap stocks may outperform in 2026. Getty Images
How Did We Do? It's that time of year again where you will see a lot of 2026 prediction articles on Seeking Alpha and other financial media with year-end targets for the S&P 500 (SPY) (
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of IVW either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Quick Insights
Recommended For You
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:004mo ago
The Publicity War Between AT&T and T-Mobile Is Getting Ugly
AT&T, T-Mobile US and Verizon are escalating their usual claims about whose wireless service is best with the launch of explicit customer poaching efforts and litigation.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:004mo ago
Is Navitas Stock a Buy or Sell After a Director Dumps Shares Worth $1.2 Million?
Gary Kent Wunderlich, a member of the Navitas Board of Directors, sold 128,300 shares for a transaction value of $1,189,754.06 across two sessions in December 2025. The sale represented 8.68% of Mr.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:134mo ago
Disney's $1 Billion Deal Brings Its Magic to OpenAI
Starting in 2026, you may be able to create images and videos through OpenAI platforms that draw inspiration from Mickey Mouse, Cinderella, Iron Man, and hundreds of other characters that fall under Disney's intellectual property.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:154mo ago
Electrovaya: Profits Are Here And A 2X Is More Realistic
SummaryElectrovaya enters a new era of profitability, posting strong Q4 and full-year results with robust margin expansion and earnings growth.ELVA's Infinity Battery Technology Platform delivers industry-leading longevity and safety, targeting electric forklifts, robotics, and airport ground equipment—diversifying beyond volatile EV markets.Customer concentration remains high, with two Fortune 500 clients accounting for 83% of revenue, but rising order flow signals deepening relationships and product validation.Management expects continued profitability and margin strength into 2026, driven by scaling production, cost control, and expansion into defense and new industrial verticals. Richard Drury/DigitalVision via Getty Images
The Era of Profits Begins Profits are here for Electrovaya (ELVA) (ELVA:CA) and, as we said a few months ago, they never lie, suggesting that a new upside trajectory may
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in ELVA over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Recommended For You
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:244mo ago
Caterpillar: Secular AI-Driven Growth, Construction Recovery, And Mining Up-Cycle
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of PATH either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-13 23:194mo ago
Mission Success: Rocket Lab Deploys First Dedicated Launch for Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)
MAHIA, New Zealand, Dec. 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rocket Lab Corporation (Nasdaq: RKLB) (“Rocket Lab” or “the Company”), a global leader in launch services and space systems, today successfully launched its first dedicated mission for the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) – a pivotal marker of Electron’s global importance for regular, reliable, and dedicated access to space.
The “RAISE And Shine” mission lifted off from Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand on December 14, 2025 at 03:09 UTC / 16:09 NZDT to successfully deploy the agency’s RApid Innovative payload demonstration SatellitE-4 (RAISE-4) spacecraft: a demonstration of eight technologies developed by private companies, universities, and research institutions throughout Japan. The mission was the first of two dedicated missions for JAXA’s Innovative Satellite Technology Demonstration Program, an initiative by the agency to demonstrate new and innovative capabilities and technologies developed by Japan’s space economy.
Rocket Lab’s successful launch for JAXA reflects the growing integration of commercial companies into national space programs both domestically and internationally. As the established small launch leader in the United States, Electron is also the preferred choice for reliable small launch globally, with its second upcoming mission for JAXA scheduled for launch in Q1 2026. A dedicated Electron launch for the European Space Agency (ESA) is also planned for launch in the new year, further highlighting Electron’s international demand.
Rocket Lab founder and CEO, Sir Peter Beck, said: “This dedicated mission delivered precision and reliability for one of the world’s most respected space agencies, and we couldn’t be prouder of supporting JAXA with the dedicated access to space needed to support the growth of Japan’s aerospace economy. We’re proud to continue delivering the responsiveness and performance that Japan’s satellite operators have come to rely on.”
“RAISE And Shine” was Rocket Lab’s 19th launch of the year: an extension of the Company’s new Electron annual launch record established just last month with two back-to-back missions launched in 48 hours. Rocket Lab’s next launch of 2025 is scheduled to take place from Launch Complex 2 this month and will be announced in the coming days.
About Rocket Lab
About Rocket Lab Rocket Lab is a leading space company that provides launch services, spacecraft, payloads and satellite components serving commercial, government, and national security markets. Rocket Lab’s Electron rocket is the world’s most frequently launched orbital small rocket; its HASTE rocket provides hypersonic test launch capability for the U.S. government and allied nations; and its Neutron launch vehicle in development will unlock medium launch for constellation deployment, national security and exploration missions. Rocket Lab’s spacecraft and satellite components have enabled more than 1,700 missions spanning commercial, defense and national security missions including GPS, constellations, and exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and Venus. Rocket Lab is a publicly listed company on the Nasdaq stock exchange (RKLB). Learn more at www.rocketlabcorp.com.
Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding our launch and space systems operations, launch schedule and window, safe and repeatable access to space, Neutron development, operational expansion and business strategy, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “strategy,” “future,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “target,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including but not limited to the factors, risks and uncertainties included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as such factors may be updated from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investor Relations section of our website at https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this press release. Any such forward-looking statements represent management’s estimates as of the date of this press release. While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-14 00:004mo ago
Could Nvidia Be the Most Undervalued Stock in AI Right Now and Be Ready to Soar in 2026?
Here's why Nvidia may be one of the most undervalued artificial intelligence (AI) stocks.
With a market cap of about $4.5 trillion, Nvidia (NVDA 3.27%) is the largest company on the planet. However, it might also just be the most undervalued artificial intelligence (AI) stock right now, too.
But don't a lot of pundits say Nvidia is overvalued? That's true; however, most claims that Nvidia is overvalued stem from its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) of around 45.5 times, which on the surface is high. Yet, based on 2026 analyst estimates, its forward P/E is below 25 times, and its price/earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio is below 0.7 times (with below 1 times considered undervalued).
But that's not all. The company also carries around $52 billion in net cash and securities on its balance sheet, and it's on pace to generate around $85 billion in free cash flow this year. For a company growing as quickly as Nvidia, those valuation metrics are cheap.
Today's Change
(
-3.27
%) $
-5.91
Current Price
$
175.02
The AI infrastructure leader
Why Nvidia is perhaps the cheapest AI stock in the market is also directly intertwined with its growth. The company has been a growth machine. Last quarter, it grew its revenue by 62% year over year, and its revenue was up nearly tenfold from just two years ago. Its adjusted earnings per share, meanwhile, climbed 60% year over year.
Nvidia also doesn't see growth slowing down in the near term. For fiscal Q4, it forecast that its revenue would climb 65% year over year to $65 billion. Its outlook for 2026 also looks promising, as the three major cloud computing companies have all indicated that they will spend aggressively on data infrastructure next year, as have others, including Meta Platforms and OpenAI.
Meanwhile, Nvidia could see its sales get a further lift in 2026 after the U.S. agreed to let the company sell its H200 chips to approved commercial customers in China. The Trump administration earlier banned the export of Nvidia's H20 chips to China, but in a turnaround, it will now allow the even more powerful H200 chips to be sold, in exchange for the U.S. government getting a 25% cut.
Over the medium term, Nvidia has projected that data center capital expenditure (capex) could hit $4 trillion by the end of the decade. As the main provider of the chips that power AI workloads, it is in a prime position to capture more than its fair share of this spending, as a large percentage will go toward chips and networking components.
Image source: Getty Images.
Nvidia's edge comes from the ecosystem it has built around its chips, which are called graphics processing units (GPUs). The name stems from the chip's original purpose, which was to speed up graphics rendering in video games. However, to expand the use cases for its chips, Nvidia developed the CUDA software platform to let developers easily program its chips for other tasks.
This was a smart move, but the even cleverer one was giving it away for free and seeding it into top universities and research labs that were doing very early work on AI. As a result, nearly all foundational AI code is written on CUDA and optimized for its GPUs. The company didn't stop there, getting into networking and creating the proprietary NVLink interconnect systems that let its chips quickly share data and memory, essentially helping them act as one big unit.
As a result, Nvidia now holds over 90% market share in the data center GPU space, which is one of the largest and fastest-growing markets ever seen. While it is seeing some increased competition, its scale, ecosystem, and the flexibility of its chips are unmatched, positioning it to continue to lead the market higher in the decade to come.
I could see Nvidia potentially earning around $20 per share in fiscal 2030 (ending January 2023) if revenue growth just continues to step down gradually.
MetricFY2026EFY2027EFY2028EFY2029EFY2030ERevenue$213$320$463$649$876Gross profit$155$233$338$473$639Adjusted operating expense$21$27$35$46$61Operating Income$134$206$303$427$578Net income$114$175$258$363$491Adjusted EPS$4.70$7.21$10.61$14.95$20.22
Data source: Author's projections. Numbers are in billions.
If that's the case, it's one of the cheapest AI names out there and has a lot of upsides ahead, including in 2026. As long as the AI infrastructure boom continues, it is a stock to own.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of AVGO, NVDA, AMD, TSMC either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-14 00:304mo ago
Build-A-Bear Workshop Stock: Keep an Eye on Tariff Impact in 2026
Build-A-Bear Workshop (BBW 1.44%) stock has delivered a total return of nearly 15% this year, factoring in quarterly dividends. It's been a bit of a roller coaster, with shares touching an all-time high of $75.85 in mid-September before pulling back sharply in October and November. As of Dec. 10, shares were trading just under $53.
Build-A-Bear has been a great investment over the past five years, rewarding patient shareholders with a 1,300% total return. A smart business strategy focusing on expansion and diversification has powered the retailer to four consecutive years of record revenue and profits. While that trend continued through the first nine months of Build-A-Bear's fiscal 2025, there's something investors will want to keep an eye on as the calendar flips to 2026.
Image source: Getty Images.
Tariffs took a bite out of third-quarter profits
On Dec. 4, Build-A-Bear's third-quarter results sent shares tumbling nearly 16%. It was a mixed quarter, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.62 topping the average analyst estimate of $0.59. Revenue grew nearly 3% to $122.7 million, although analysts were expecting $124 million. But the thing that really seemed to rattle investors was the impact of tariffs, which the retailer mentioned early and often in its Q3 earnings release.
Pre-tax income -- Build-A-Bear's go-to metric for measuring profitability -- fell 18% to $10.7 million. The company attributed the year-over-year decline to a $4 million hit from tariffs and related costs. The drop in pre-tax income had a ripple effect: Both diluted EPS and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) were down around 15% compared to the year-ago period.
Interestingly, Build-A-Bear's Q3 "marked the first meaningful expenses from tariffs and related costs," as the retailer was able to mitigate their impact during the first half of the year, according to CFO Voin Todorovic. But Todorovic said Build-A-Bear expects "this elevated level of impact to continue through the fourth quarter and into the next fiscal year."
Today's Change
(
-1.44
%) $
-0.77
Current Price
$
52.74
Build-A-Bear's business strategy is still working
For fiscal year 2025, Build-A-Bear expects to take an $11 million hit from tariffs. The good news for investors is that's already baked into the company's guidance. In fact, Build-A-Bear reaffirmed its full-year outlook, which puts the company on track for its fifth consecutive year of record revenue and profitability if pre-tax income hits the top end of the guidance.
During the Q3 earnings call, analysts asked how the company will manage the impact of tariffs in fiscal 2026. Todorovic said Build-A-Bear will focus on the things it can control -- such as working with suppliers in Asia to reduce costs, increasing prices where it makes sense, and managing promotions and discounts "much more stringently."
Management also emphasized that Build-A-Bear will continue executing its business strategy, which focuses on diversifying its business model and revenue streams. One example is its Mini Beans collection. With sales approaching 3 million units, CEO Sharon Price John sees the proprietary line of stuffed toys as an opportunity to extend the Build-A-Bear brand's reach "through thousands of additional points of sale beyond the workshop."
Build-A-Bear has a strong plan in place to continue growing. If tariff concerns dent the stock price in 2026, investors might consider buying the dip.
SummaryNebius has secured hyperscaler-scale contracts, institutional funding, and multi-year demand visibility, positioning it structurally ahead of most neocloud competitors.NBIS trades near $87, below the $92.50 equity raise, with technical, behavioral, and options-related barriers capping upside near $100.September 2025 financing raised $4.2 billion, including $2.75 billion convertibles at $138–140, creating a psychological and mechanical dilution overhang.Q3 2025 GAAP net loss reached $119.6 million, with $432.4 million operating cash burn year-to-date amid aggressive infrastructure buildout.Institutional ownership remains near 48% with 105.6 million shares held, while analysts maintain a $151 average target, implying ~73% upside. Jian Fan/iStock via Getty Images
Investment Thesis Nebius Group (NBIS) has already crossed a threshold that most AI infrastructure startups never reach. It has secured hyperscaler-scale contracts, raised capital at institutional depth, and locked in multi-year demand visibility, placing it structurally ahead
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of NBIS either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Quick Insights
Recommended For You
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-14 00:574mo ago
Oil News: Oil Outlook Weakens as Oversupply Keeps Crude Oil Under Pressure
Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.
2025-12-14 06:244mo ago
2025-12-14 01:004mo ago
How ASML's Lithography Machines Shape the AI Chip Industry
Without ASML, there would be no ChatGPT, no new iPhone models and no cutting edge AI innovation. The chipmaking machines ASML produces are so indispensable to the world's tech ecosystem, it's now Europe's most valuable company.
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
Bitcoin has been the undisputed dominant force in the financial world. In a swift change of financial gravity, the spotlight has shifted from the decentralized digital asset to the US government treasury. As liquidity becomes the defining force behind every major market move, the Treasury General Account (TGA) has emerged as the true engine capable of driving risk assets.
Why Bitcoin’s Cycles Matter Less When Federal Cash Levels Shift
The most important chart for 2026 isn’t Bitcoin, it’s the US Treasury’s checking account. Crypto analyst Kyle Chassé has noted that the reason crypto has stalled is because of the government’s liquidity plumbing. Meanwhile, the TGA has just surged to $1 trillion, creating a massive liquidity vacuum in the cycle. When the treasury replenishes its funds, it drains dollars from the broader financial system.
However, to avoid a recession heading into 2026, the government must drain the account back down. Draining the TGA means pushing $150 billion to $200 billion back into the banking system. In addition, the Quantitative Tightening (QT) has officially ceased, meaning the government is done draining liquidity, and asset prices track liquidity.
Analyst Theunipcs revealed that the third rate cut of 2025 has been released, bringing the target range to its lowest level in nearly three years. The Fed also announced a new liquidity injection of roughly $40 billion per month in Treasury bill purchases. This policy pivot is happening immediately after BTC bounced from a 35% correction, which is the deepest pullback BTC has seen so far in this cycle.
At the same time, the most conservative trillion-dollar asset managers like Vanguard and Charles Schwab are pushing crypto products to their tens of millions of users for the first time. This isn’t the time to be bearish, but to be buying the dips aggressively.
Weekly Support Holds As Bitcoin Searches For A Relative Trend Reversal
A full-time crypto trader and investor, Daan Crypto Trades, highlighted that Bitcoin is currently trading only about 18% above its 2021 highs compared to the NASDAQ. Currently, the BTC/NASDAQ ratio is testing the Weekly Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a level that is providing support. Initially, BTC saw a clear breakout in this ratio during 2024 and early 2025, but since then, momentum has stalled as stocks continued to grind higher, fueled by the AI tech rally.
According to the expert, the tech stock momentum is starting to cool, at least temporarily, and will watch if this ratio moves back in favor of BTC again for a while. Due to the rotation signal, BTC is already showing signs that the index, like the Russell 2000 (Small Caps), is starting to outperform, as the tech stocks are cooling off a bit.
BTC trading at $90,357 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Sign Up for Our Newsletter!
For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.
Godspower Owie is my name, and I work for the news platforms NewsBTC and Bitcoinist. I sometimes like to think of myself as an explorer since I enjoy exploring new places, learning new things, especially valuable ones, and meeting new people who have an impact on my life, no matter how small. I value my family, friends, career, and time. Really, those are most likely the most significant aspects of every person's existence. Not illusions, but dreams are what I pursue.
2025-12-14 05:244mo ago
2025-12-14 00:004mo ago
XRP News Today: XRP Steadies Above $2 on ETF and Policy Optimism
Below, I will explore the key drivers behind recent price trends, the medium-term (4-8 weeks) outlook, and the key technical levels traders should watch.
US XRP-Spot ETFs Inflows Signal Supply-Demand Imbalance
US XRP-spot ETFs reported total net inflows of $87.46 million in the reporting week ending Friday, December 12. Five XRP-spot ETFs have seen net inflows of $974.5 million since launch, with a nineteen-day inflow streak.
21Shares launched this week but has yet to register net inflows. However, sentiment toward the demand outlook for spot ETFs is bullish, given the robust institutional demand since launch.
Canary Fund CEO Steven McClurg commented on the early demand for XRP-spot ETFs, stating:
“SOL ETFs launched before XRP, but XRP ETFs have now passed SOL in total AUM. I expected this. SOL is much more efficient to hold on-chain and to stake directly for retail audiences, whereas XRP has more institutional demand and no staking. As with everything, there will be an audience that prefers direct ownership, and an audience that prefers the ease of financial instruments. Some will do both.”
Market Structure Bill Edges Closer to a Senate Vote
The reference to institutional demand for XRP will be pivotal, given the Market Structure Bill’s progress on Capitol Hill.
XRPUSD – Daily Chart – 141225 – Market Structure Bill Effect
Bullish Medium-Term Outlook Hinges on ETFs and Legislation
The Market Structure Bill’s progress on Capitol Hill and institutional demand for XRP-spot ETF flows continue to bolster buyer appetite. However, there are several potential price catalysts in the week ahead, including:
XRP-spot ETFs see an inflow surge.
The Market Structure Bill progresses toward a Senate vote.
US inflation softens, and the US labor market cools, supporting a more dovish Fed rate path.
In my view, these scenarios would support a near-term (1-4 weeks) move to $2.35 and a medium-term (4-8 weeks) climb to $2.5.
Downside Risks to Bullish Outlook
While the short- to medium-term outlook remains bullish, several events could weigh on sentiment. These include:
The Bank of Japan hikes interest rates and hints at multiple 2026 rate hikes, leading to a yen carry trade unwind.
The MSCI delists digital asset treasury companies (DATs). Delistings would likely reduce interest in XRP as a treasury reserve asset.
US Senate challenges the Market Structure Bill.
XRP-spot ETFs report outflows.
These events would likely drag XRP below $2, exposing the November low of $1.82.
However, in my opinion, sustained XRP-spot ETF inflows, a broadening investor base, and US crypto legislative developments support a longer-term move toward $3.
In summary, the short-term outlook remains cautiously bullish as fundamentals outweigh the technicals. Meanwhile, the medium- to longer-term outlook is constructive.
Financial Analysis
Technical Outlook: EMAs Signal Caution
XRP gained 0.78% on Saturday, December 13, partially reversing the previous day’s 1.30% loss to close at $2.0235. The token outperformed the broader crypto market, which advanced 0.31%.
Despite snapping a three-day losing streak, XRP remained below the 50-day and 200-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs), signaling a bearish bias. While technicals remain bearish, fundamentals are increasingly outweighing the technical structure.
Key technical levels to watch include:
Support levels: $2, $1.9112, and $1.8239
50-day EMA resistance: $2.2248.
200-day EMA resistance: $2.4529.
Resistance levels: $2.2, $2.35, $2.5, $2.62, $2.8, $3.0, and $3.66.
Holding above the $2.0 psychological support level would pave the way toward $2.2 resistance level and the 50-day EMA. A break above $2.2 and the 50-day EMA would bring the $2.35 resistance level into view.
Significantly, a sustained break above the 50-day EMA would indicate a near-term bullish trend reversal. A bullish trend reversal would signal a medium-term (4-8 weeks) climb toward the 200-day EMA and the $2.5 level.
2025-12-14 04:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:354mo ago
MicroStrategy Retains Spot in Nasdaq 100 Amid Criticism
MicroStrategy maintains a strong position in Nasdaq 100 despite Bitcoin strategy scrutiny.Market analysts view this as an indicator of Bitcoin’s corporate entrenchment.Bitcoin’s market volatility is a concern for traditional financial sectors.
MicroStrategy will remain in the Nasdaq 100 index following the annual adjustment, effective December 22, as announced by Nasdaq on December 12, 2025.
This retention reaffirms MicroStrategy’s commitment to its Bitcoin-focused strategy despite facing criticism, influencing BTC market sentiment due to its substantial holdings.
Market Reactions and Future Implications for BTC Strategy
MicroStrategy, famous for its strategic pivot to Bitcoin in 2020, was re-confirmed as part of the Nasdaq 100 index. Under Executive Chairman Michael Saylor, the company holds 660,624 Bitcoins, reflecting a strategic focus shift from software solutions.
In terms of immediate implications, the firm continues to challenge standard business norms, emphasizing Bitcoin as its principal treasury asset amid ongoing critics from financial sectors. The retention in the index underscores investment community interest, despite the volatility concerns.
In response to this retention, Michael Saylor remarked that BTC accumulation will proceed until critical voices subside. Market analysts view this continued index presence as indicative of Bitcoin’s entrenchment in corporate strategies, persuading skeptics of Bitcoin’s viability.
Historical Context, Price Data, and Expert Analysis
Did you know? MicroStrategy’s inclusion in Nasdaq 100 last December was a pivotal moment showcasing institutional validation of cryptocurrency strategies despite traditional financial criticisms.
According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin’s current price is $90,329.66 with a market cap of $1.80 trillion and a 24-hour trading volume dropping by 20.56% to $63.79 billion. Recent months see BTC prices down by 9.34% over 30 days, marking volatile market dynamics.
Bitcoin(BTC), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 00:32 UTC on December 14, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap
Insights from the Coincu research team suggest that MicroStrategy’s steadfast commitment to BTC might encourage more traditional companies to consider cryptocurrency investments. Regulatory developments also play a role, with scrutiny levels potentially affecting institutional confidence in the current BTC-focused strategy.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Rate this post
2025-12-14 04:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:304mo ago
Can Pendle hold $2 after Polychain pulls the plug at $4M loss?
Since facing rejection nearly $6.2 months ago, Pendle traded inside a steep downtrend, eventually dropping to a $2.02 low.
At press time, Pendle traded around $2.17, down 4.1% daily and nearly 18.5% monthly, reflecting sustained bearish pressure.
That prolonged weakness appeared to push long-term holders, including institutions, toward capitulation.
Polychain exits at a loss
Despite Pendle [PENDLE] recording brief recoveries over the past month, whale behavior stayed consistent.
CryptoQuant’s Spot Average Order Size showed Big Whale Orders persisted for nearly 30 consecutive days, signaling steady large-player activity.
Source: CryptoQuant
However, that activity leaned heavily toward distribution.
One notable seller was Polychain Capital, flagged by on-chain tracker EmberCN. According to EmberCN, Polychain Capital exited its Pendle position after holding the token for several months.
The firm accumulated roughly 4.114 million PENDLE between March and September at an average price near $3.16, totaling about $13 million.
Source: EmberCN
Roughly four months later, Polychain Capital sold the holdings for around $2.19, locking in an estimated $3.99 million loss.
Such loss-based exits often reflected a sentiment shift, where conviction weakened under prolonged downside pressure.
That shift extended beyond one wallet.
Coinalyze data showed Pendle posted a negative Buy Sell Delta for nine straight days, confirming sustained spot-side selling pressure. Negative delta readings indicated sell orders consistently outweighed buys, reinforcing downside dominance.
Source: Coinalyze
Can $2 support survive?
AMBCrypto observed that Pendle’s broader downtrend remained intact as sellers continued to control price action. On the daily chart, the Relative Strength Index fell to 36, placing the token near oversold territory.
Source: TradingView
Meanwhile, the Directional Movement Index showed the Positive Directional Index sliding to 13, highlighting strong bearish momentum. That alignment typically favored trend continuation.
If selling pressure persisted, Pendle could lose the $2 support level, opening the door toward the $1.80 zone.
For sentiment to stabilize, the price would need to reclaim $2.25, signaling renewed buyer defense.
A sustained hold above that level could then allow a recovery attempt toward $2.50.
Final Thoughts
Polychain Capital’s exit marked a visible break in long-term conviction, but it was not the only signal weighing on Pendle.
Sustained spot selling and weak momentum suggested broader hesitation among buyers.
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 17:374mo ago
Zcash Buyers Pull $17 Million Off Exchanges as Price Pauses — What Comes Next?
The Zcash price has seen a sharp run this cycle, up over 700% in three months, followed by a healthy pause. After rallying strongly through the last week, the price is now pulling back, raising questions about whether momentum is fading or simply resetting.
While short-term price action looks undecided, on-chain and volume data suggest buyers may still be quietly in control. The next move depends on whether Zcash can turn consolidation into continuation.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Buyers Still Control Structure Despite Cooling VolumeZcash price is currently trading inside a tightening triangle pattern, which reflects short-term buyer and seller indecision rather than outright weakness. Importantly, the price continues to respect the rising trend line that has guided the uptrend this cycle. As long as that structure holds, the broader setup remains constructive.
Volume behavior adds key context. Using Wyckoff-style volume color analysis, blue bars indicate buyer-led activity, while yellow and red bars reflect increasing seller control.
Although buyer volume has cooled recently, blue bars are still dominant. A similar slowdown occurred after October 17, when buying pressure briefly weakened, before Zcash went on to rally by more than 300%.
Cooling volume alone did not end that trend. As long as the blue bars dominate, the rally is likely to remain strong, despite any pullbacks.
Zcash Buyers In Control: TradingViewWant more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
Spot flow data reinforces this picture. Spot flows track whether coins are moving onto or off exchanges.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Inflows suggest potential selling, while outflows signal accumulation. On December 12, Zcash recorded roughly $14.26 million in spot inflows, meaning coins moved onto exchanges.
By December 13, that flipped sharply to around $17.34 million in net outflows, showing coins being pulled off exchanges instead.
Sudden Surge In Sopt Buyers: CoinglassThat shift matters. Exchange outflows reduce immediate sell pressure and often reflect spot buyers stepping in during pullbacks rather than distributing into strength.
Despite a mild pullback of about 2.5% over the past 24 hours, Zcash remains up roughly 20% over the past week and more than 700% over the past three months. The trend has not broken. It is consolidating.
Zcash Price Levels That Define the Next MoveFor the bullish structure to continue, the Zcash price needs to break out of the triangle. The key level to watch is $511, a 24% move from current levels. A clean daily close above this level would confirm a bullish resolution and signal renewed buyer control.
If that breakout occurs, the first upside target sits near $549, followed by $733, which capped rallies earlier in the cycle. Higher resistance zones exist near $850 and $1,190, though reaching those would require sustained momentum and supportive broader market conditions.
Zcash Price Analysis: TradingViewDownside risk remains clearly defined. If the Zcash price loses $430, the triangle structure weakens. Strong support sits near $391, and a deeper breakdown could open the door to $301 if risk-off pressure spreads across the market.
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:304mo ago
Pi Coin Price Falls 28% From November Highs — Do Charts Now Hint At Reversal?
Pi Coin has struggled since late November. After peaking near the end of the month, the price has dropped roughly 28%, erasing most of its earlier gains. Over the past seven days alone, Pi Coin is down about 8.6%, and over the past three months, losses now exceed 40%.
Despite that weakness, the latest chart data shows something new forming beneath the surface. Momentum pressure is starting to shift, raising the question of whether the correction may be nearing a pause. Will the pause lead to a rebound or a complete reversal? Time to find out!
Sponsored
Sponsored
Momentum Pressure Is Easing, But Buyers Are Still HesitantOn the daily chart, Pi Coin has formed a hidden bullish divergence between November 4 and December 11. During this period, price made a higher low while the Relative Strength Index made a lower low. RSI measures momentum by tracking the speed of buying and selling. When price holds higher levels while momentum weakens, it often signals that selling pressure is starting to fade.
Bullishness Appears On The Pi Chart: TradingViewWant more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
This type of divergence usually appears near the end of sharp dips. It does not confirm a reversal by itself, but it often precedes rebound attempts when sellers begin to lose control.
However, momentum alone is not enough. The Chaikin Money Flow, which tracks whether large buyers or sellers are dominating volume, is still flashing caution. CMF remains close to testing its descending trend line (connecting lower lows) and is also trading below the zero line. This shows that big money flows have not turned supportive towards Pi Coin, yet.
Big Money Flow Remains Weak: TradingViewSponsored
Sponsored
In simple terms, selling pressure looks weaker, but the big buyers are not fully committed. That keeps the rebound setup fragile. Until money flow improves, upside attempts are likely to face resistance. And if the CMF breaks below the trendline, the rebound (not reversal) setup for the Pi Network coin might get invalidated, completely.
Pi Coin Price Levels That Decide What’s NextThe PI price chart now sits at a decision point. For the rebound structure to gain traction, Pi Coin needs to reclaim the $0.222 area. A sustained move above this level would mark roughly a 7% advance and signal that buyers are willing to defend higher prices again. If that happens, the price could extend toward $0.244 and possibly $0.253, provided broader market conditions stabilize.
Only a price move above $0.284 (late November high) could signal a reversal attempt. That point seems to be far off now.
Pi Coin Price Analysis: TradingViewSupport remains just below current levels. The $0.203 zone is critical. A daily close below $0.203 would weaken the rebound case significantly and expose the downside again. If that level fails, Pi Coin could retest lower areas and push the correction into a new leg.
The rebound setup only strengthens if the price moves higher while the CMF begins to rise toward zero. Without that confirmation, upside attempts risk stalling quickly.
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:404mo ago
Crypto Industry Milestone: Ripple, Circle, and BitGo Secure Conditional Banking Approvals
On December 12, 2025, Ripple, Circle, and BitGo achieved a significant milestone by obtaining conditional approval for U.S. banking charters. This development marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of the cryptocurrency sector, reflecting its growing legitimacy and integration into the traditional financial system. These approvals represent a critical juncture as they allow these companies to expand their offerings and reach a broader market, potentially reshaping the financial landscape.
Ripple, known for its cross-border payment solutions, Circle, a major player in stablecoin issuance, and BitGo, a prominent digital asset custody provider, have each received this provisional green light from U.S. regulators. The implications are vast, as it could enable these companies to offer a more comprehensive suite of financial services, including direct banking operations, under the regulatory oversight of the U.S. banking system. This move could lead to enhanced trust and utility of cryptocurrencies and digital assets among consumers and institutional investors alike.
Historically, the U.S. banking system has been a cornerstone in the global financial landscape, and integrating crypto companies into this framework could herald a new era of financial innovation. The U.S. has been cautious in its approach to cryptocurrency regulation, balancing the need to protect consumers with fostering innovation. With these approvals, the U.S. seems to be opening its doors wider to digital finance, potentially serving as a model for other countries grappling with how to regulate the burgeoning crypto industry.
However, these conditional approvals come with specific regulatory requirements that Ripple, Circle, and BitGo must fulfill before they can operate fully as banks. This includes satisfying the capital requirements, compliance standards, and other obligations typically required of traditional financial institutions. The conditions ensure that these companies will operate with the same level of scrutiny and responsibility as any other bank, aligning the crypto industry closer to mainstream finance.
The U.S. banking charter is highly coveted as it affords companies the ability to operate nationally, bypassing the complex web of state-by-state financial regulations. For Ripple, this means a more streamlined approach to implementing its blockchain technology for international payments, potentially lowering costs and increasing efficiency for consumers. Circle, with its USDC stablecoin, could leverage this status to enhance its role in the digital payments ecosystem, offering a more stable and secure alternative to traditional fiat currencies. BitGo could expand its custody services, providing more robust protection and management of digital assets, a critical service as institutional interest in crypto continues to rise.
Despite these promising prospects, there are risks to consider. The integration of crypto companies into the banking system poses security concerns, as the digital nature of cryptocurrencies makes them susceptible to cyber threats. Additionally, the volatility inherent in cryptocurrencies could pose financial stability risks, especially if these companies become deeply embedded within the broader financial system. Furthermore, the regulatory landscape is still evolving, and future changes could impact how these companies operate.
The approval of these banking charters is not just a victory for the individual companies but also a broader endorsement of the potential that digital currencies hold. As of now, traditional banks have been cautiously exploring the digital asset space, often through partnerships or limited service offerings. The entry of established crypto companies into the banking sector could catalyze more profound changes, encouraging traditional banks to accelerate their adoption of blockchain technologies and integrate digital assets into their portfolios.
Globally, there has been a growing trend of countries and financial institutions exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and other blockchain-based financial solutions. The U.S. has been relatively slow in this area compared to countries like China, which has aggressively pursued the digital yuan. The success of Ripple, Circle, and BitGo in securing these charters could spur the U.S. to increase its efforts in developing a national digital currency strategy.
While this move is a step forward, it also serves as a reminder that the regulatory journey for crypto is far from over. The path to full integration into the financial system involves navigating complex regulatory landscapes and addressing the technological challenges inherent in blockchain and digital assets. As these companies work to meet their regulatory obligations, they will need to maintain a delicate balance between innovation and compliance.
As the industry progresses, continuous dialogue between regulators and crypto companies will be crucial. Establishing clear regulatory frameworks that protect consumers without stifling innovation is a challenging but necessary task. The success of this integration will rely heavily on regulators’ ability to adapt and crypto companies’ commitment to transparency and security.
In conclusion, the conditional approval of U.S. banking charters for Ripple, Circle, and BitGo is a landmark moment for the cryptocurrency industry, opening new avenues for growth and integration. With careful planning and adherence to regulatory standards, these companies are poised to play a significant role in shaping the future of both the crypto and traditional financial sectors. However, the journey will require vigilance and adaptability to mitigate risks and ensure a stable and secure financial ecosystem. As the world watches, this development sets the stage for what could be the next great transformation in global finance.
Post Views: 15
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:554mo ago
Bitcoin's Uncertain Path: Will a Breakout Shatter the $90K Ceiling Soon
As of this weekend, Bitcoin’s price fluctuates between $89,250 and $90,500, hinting at the possibility of a breakout but elusive in its commitment. With a market capitalization exceeding $1.8 trillion and trading volume reaching $53.15 billion daily, Bitcoin is capturing significant market interest. Despite this, its direction remains uncertain, reflecting an intriguing tension within the cryptocurrency landscape.
Bitcoin’s current trading range may suggest stability, yet the pressure is mounting for a dramatic shift. Historically, Bitcoin’s price has experienced similar periods of stagnation, often preluding significant upward or downward trends. For instance, in late 2017, Bitcoin hovered around $10,000 for weeks before skyrocketing to nearly $20,000. This historical context implies that the current price compression could precede a major movement.
The stagnation is partly attributed to diverse factors influencing the cryptocurrency market. Regulatory concerns loom large, as governments worldwide continue to scrutinize and impose regulations on digital assets. In 2023, major economies like the United States and China intensified their regulatory frameworks, affecting investor sentiment and price movements. Moreover, ongoing debates about environmental impacts linked to Bitcoin mining have further complicated perceptions and strategies around its adoption and investment.
While the current price range might seem stable, underlying volatility remains a key characteristic of Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market. Market participants often engage in speculative trading, which can lead to sharp price swings. This volatility is a double-edged sword—potentially highly rewarding for bold investors, but equally perilous for those unprepared for sudden shifts.
Several analysts believe that Bitcoin’s current compression is akin to a spring coiling up, ready to release energy. However, whether this energy will propel Bitcoin upwards or lead to a downward correction remains speculative. Factors contributing to a possible upward breakout include increased institutional investment and broader adoption as a mainstream financial asset. Companies and financial institutions continue to integrate Bitcoin into their portfolios, signaling robust confidence in its future potential.
On the other hand, economic factors such as rising interest rates could dampen enthusiasm for riskier assets like Bitcoin. Central banks worldwide are adjusting monetary policies, responding to inflationary pressures. Higher interest rates may encourage investors to reallocate funds to more traditional, low-risk assets, potentially causing downward pressure on Bitcoin’s price.
Bitcoin’s role as a hedge against inflation is another aspect that influences its market dynamics. In an era of fluctuating fiat currency values, many investors consider Bitcoin a safe haven. This perception may drive demand, especially in times of economic uncertainty. However, Bitcoin’s relative newness compared to traditional assets like gold introduces uncertainty regarding its effectiveness as an inflation hedge.
Moreover, the cryptocurrency market is experiencing increased competition from emerging digital assets. Alternative cryptocurrencies, often referred to as altcoins, are gaining traction with innovative features and applications. These competitors could divert attention and capital away from Bitcoin, impacting its market position and future price trajectory.
Adding further complexity to the market is the ongoing debate over Bitcoin’s scalability and transaction speed. While Bitcoin remains the most recognized cryptocurrency, its network faces challenges in handling increasing transaction volumes efficiently. Technological advancements, such as the Lightning Network, aim to address these issues, but concerns about scalability continue to deter some potential investors.
The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining remains a contentious issue. The energy-intensive nature of mining operations has drawn criticism from environmental advocates and policymakers. Efforts to transition to more sustainable energy sources are underway but achieving significant reductions in carbon footprint is a gradual process. This ongoing concern may influence regulatory policies and, consequently, investor confidence.
Despite the uncertainties, Bitcoin’s fundamental appeal persists, with its decentralized nature offering an alternative to traditional banking systems. This decentralization is especially attractive in regions with unstable financial systems or authoritarian governments, where individuals seek financial independence and security.
Looking ahead, Bitcoin’s trajectory will likely be shaped by a confluence of factors. Investor sentiment, regulatory developments, technological advancements, and macroeconomic trends will all play pivotal roles in determining its path. For investors and stakeholders, staying informed and adaptable will be crucial in navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.
In conclusion, Bitcoin’s current price compression presents both an opportunity and a risk. While the potential for a strong breakout exists, various economic, regulatory, and technological factors could also precipitate a downturn. As the market awaits Bitcoin’s next move, the broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry remain profound, marking an important juncture in its ongoing evolution.
Post Views: 14
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:054mo ago
Ethical and Financial Implications as Ethereum ETFs Face $19 Million Outflow
On December 12, Ethereum-focused exchange-traded funds (ETFs) witnessed net outflows totaling $19.41 million, coinciding with Ethereum’s struggle to move past the $3,000 price mark. BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF, labeled ETHA, saw inflows of $23.25 million, while funds managed by Grayscale experienced combined withdrawals amounting to $36.52 million. These diverse movements within the ETF sector highlight a mix of investor confidence and caution amidst a fluctuating crypto landscape.
This ETF activity occurs amid a broader market uncertainty. Ethereum, a prominent player in the cryptocurrency sector known for its smart contract capabilities, has seen its market dynamics increasingly influenced by the introduction and performance of financial products like ETFs. Over the past decade, Ethereum has solidified its status not just as a cryptocurrency but as a vital infrastructure for decentralized applications, impacting sectors from finance to supply chain management. Despite its crucial role, Ethereum’s price still exhibits significant volatility, influenced by investor sentiment and regulatory developments.
The outflows from Grayscale’s ETFs, one of the largest managers of digital currency assets, suggest caution among investors, perhaps driven by profit-taking or reallocations. In contrast, BlackRock’s inflows indicate an ongoing belief in Ethereum’s potential, as some investors seek exposure through regulated financial products. The disparity in these ETF movements underscores the complex sentiment surrounding Ethereum.
In recent years, the crypto industry has witnessed a substantial increase in interest from institutional investors, eager to capitalize on the high returns often associated with digital assets. However, this influx of institutional money brings a double-edged sword. While it provides legitimacy and stability to a certain extent, it also introduces traditional market behaviors such as profit cycles and risk aversion, which can lead to significant inflows and outflows, impacting asset prices.
Ethereum’s current price stagnation near the $3,000 level can be attributed to multiple factors beyond ETF flows. Macroeconomic conditions, such as interest rate policies and global financial stability, play a significant role in shaping investor behavior. Additionally, regulatory developments continue to influence market confidence. Governments around the world are grappling with how to regulate cryptocurrencies, balancing innovation with risk management. In the United States, regulatory clarity remains a work in progress, with recent legislative efforts aiming to establish a framework that could significantly impact market dynamics.
The development of Ethereum 2.0, aimed at improving scalability and reducing energy consumption through a shift from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, is another critical factor under scrutiny. While this upgrade promises significant improvements for the Ethereum network, its full implementation and the transition process present challenges that investors are closely monitoring. Network upgrades and their successful deployment can affect the confidence in Ethereum’s future, influencing investment decisions.
Moreover, the competition Ethereum faces from other blockchain networks should not be underestimated. Rivals like Solana, Cardano, and Polkadot are vying for dominance with their own innovations and have gained traction due to their unique features and efficiencies. These competitors have been successfully attracting developers and projects, which could shift the balance of power within the crypto ecosystem, affecting Ethereum’s market position.
However, the potential for Ethereum remains robust due to its extensive existing infrastructure and developer community. The network’s widespread adoption in decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) highlights its versatility and entrenched role in digital innovation. Despite the current challenges and competition, Ethereum’s foundational strengths offer a compelling argument for its long-term viability.
One risk associated with Ethereum’s ETF market is the potential for heightened volatility. ETFs, by virtue of being easily tradable and accessible, can exacerbate swings in asset prices as they provide a conduit for rapid entry and exit from the market. This liquidity, while beneficial, can also lead to price distortions, particularly in times of market stress. Therefore, investors must weigh the benefits of liquidity against the risk of volatility.
In addition to financial factors, ethical considerations are emerging in discussions about Ethereum’s future. The shift to Ethereum 2.0 with the proof-of-stake model aims to address environmental concerns associated with high energy consumption in proof-of-work systems. While this transition is a positive step, it raises questions about the centralization of control among those with significant holdings, which could affect the decentralized ethos that originally defined Ethereum.
The road ahead for Ethereum involves navigating these financial, technical, and ethical challenges. Investors and stakeholders must stay informed and adaptable as the landscape evolves. As regulatory environments mature and the crypto market continues to integrate with traditional finance, Ethereum’s journey will be marked by both opportunities and obstacles.
In summary, the recent net outflows from Ethereum ETFs reflect a moment of reevaluation for investors amid broader market and regulatory contexts. While some funds are seeing inflows, others are experiencing significant withdrawals, pointing to a mixed sentiment landscape. Ethereum’s price stall at $3,000 serves as a reminder of the inherent volatility in the crypto market and the various factors influencing asset valuation. As the market matures and Ethereum continues to evolve, stakeholders will need to carefully navigate the ever-shifting terrain of digital finance.
Post Views: 10
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:254mo ago
Tether Makes Bold Move to Acquire Major Stake in Juventus FC
Tether has put forward a formal cash bid to acquire a significant stake in Juventus Football Club. This bid specifically targets the 65.4% ownership held by Exor, the holding company that has controlled Juventus for several years. Tether’s move not only aims to take over Exor’s substantial share but also plans for a follow-up public offer to purchase the remaining shares under the same terms.
This strategic decision marks Tether’s first major venture into the sports industry. Known primarily for its stablecoin, USDT, Tether has been a pivotal player in the cryptocurrency market, providing stability amidst the volatility typical of digital currencies. The acquisition of a historic club like Juventus, which boasts a storied legacy in Italian and European football, indicates Tether’s ambition to broaden its influence beyond the digital currency sphere.
Juventus, based in Turin, Italy, is one of the most successful football clubs in the world, with numerous national and international titles to its name. It has a rich history dating back to 1897 and is beloved not only in Italy but globally, with millions of fans. The club has consistently been a top contender in Serie A, Italy’s premier football league, and has also made significant impacts in European competitions.
The proposed acquisition comes at a time when the intersection of sports and cryptocurrency is gaining momentum. The sports world has increasingly been integrating blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies, with several clubs and leagues experimenting with fan tokens and blockchain-based ticketing solutions. This trend speaks to a broader movement within the industry, aiming to leverage technological advancements to enhance fan engagement and streamline operations.
Tether’s potential ownership of Juventus could bring about substantial changes, not only in the club’s financial strategies but also in how it engages with its global fanbase. Blockchain technology could be used to enhance transparency in club operations, while cryptocurrency could offer new avenues for fan interaction and club funding.
However, Tether’s entry into the sports domain is not without its challenges. The company has faced scrutiny over its financial practices and the backing of its stablecoin. Critics have often questioned the transparency of Tether’s operations and its ability to maintain the 1:1 dollar backing that USDT promises. Such concerns could influence the perception and acceptance of Tether’s involvement in a high-profile sports entity like Juventus.
From a financial perspective, Juventus has encountered its fair share of economic hurdles in recent years. Despite its historical success, the club has been navigating through financial difficulties, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in substantial revenue losses due to empty stadiums and disrupted league schedules. This context might explain Exor’s willingness to sell its stake, seeing a partnership with Tether as a route to financial stabilization and potential growth.
Globally, the sports industry has been increasingly attracting investments from unconventional sectors, with tech companies and private equity firms eyeing sports teams as lucrative assets. This trend mirrors the historical pattern seen in other industries, where technological or financial innovation often leads to significant structural shifts. Tether’s bid for Juventus could be a precursor to further cryptocurrency investments in sports, signaling a new era of digital finance intertwining with traditional entertainment sectors.
While the potential benefits of Tether’s acquisition are apparent, there are inherent risks involved. The volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market could pose challenges for the club’s financial stability. Furthermore, integrating blockchain and cryptocurrency into a traditional sports framework may face resistance from stakeholders accustomed to conventional financial systems.
In comparative contexts, the sports markets in countries like the United States have already seen significant digital transformation. The National Basketball Association (NBA), for instance, has embraced technological advancements through initiatives like NBA Top Shot, a blockchain-based platform allowing fans to buy, sell, and trade officially licensed NBA collectible highlights. Such examples could serve as a blueprint for how Juventus might integrate similar technologies under Tether’s potential ownership.
Looking ahead, if Tether successfully acquires Juventus, it could pave the way for more cryptocurrency firms to explore sports acquisitions, further blurring the lines between digital finance and sporting enterprises. This move could not only enhance the global reach of cryptocurrency companies but also provide sports clubs with innovative tools to engage fans and generate revenue in creative ways.
Yet, the outcome of Tether’s bid remains uncertain, as regulatory bodies and stakeholders will likely scrutinize the transaction, ensuring compliance with legal frameworks and assessing the potential impacts on both the club and its supporters. If these hurdles are overcome, Tether’s involvement could represent a transformative era for Juventus, shaping the club’s trajectory in unforeseen ways.
In conclusion, Tether’s ambitious bid to acquire Juventus is a bold step that reflects the evolving relationship between technology, finance, and sports. While the integration of these sectors promises exciting opportunities for innovation and growth, it also requires careful navigation to balance the interests of all stakeholders involved. The world will be watching closely as this potential acquisition unfolds, marking a pivotal moment in the intersection of cryptocurrency and sports.
Post Views: 8
2025-12-14 03:244mo ago
2025-12-13 22:004mo ago
Bitcoin To Retest $85,000 Mark In Coming Days – Here's Why
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
Amid a steady price rebound in the Bitcoin (BTC) market, popular market analyst with the X username KillaXBT is predicting another significant correction in the forthcoming days.
Bitcoin Historical Data Reveals Recurring Monthly 8% Price Decline
In an X post on December 12, KillaXBT outlines a cautious market insight that suggests Bitcoin is headed for a price pullback. According to the renowned analyst, the premier cryptocurrency has consistently recorded an 8% price decline after the 14th day of the last five months. KillaXBT describes this observation as the 14th Pivot, which now holds important implications for Bitcoin in the short term. Since hitting a price bottom of $80,000 in late November, BTC has formed an ascending channel, recording a steady series of higher lows and higher highs.
Source: @KillaXBT on X
However, KillaXBT’s projection is expected to break this channel, potentially halting the nascent uptrend. Going by the recurring price pattern, the analyst states Bitcoin investors should anticipate a minimum 5% price decline after the 14th of December, hinting at a potential retest of the 85,000-$86,000 price zone.
Given the asset’s broader bullish market structure, such a move may represent nothing more than a short-term pullback. However, the prolonged correction seen earlier in Q4 has already set a precedent, leaving room for another phase of deeper downside should momentum weaken.
BTC To Bottom Below $50,000?
In another X post, KillaXBT shares more bearish projections of the Bitcoin market. This time, the seasoned analyst predicts the crypto market leader will hit a price bottom of $48,905 despite recent price gains. KillaXBT’s bottom target represents Bitcoin’s price as of the approval of the BlackRock IBIT ETF, alongside 11 other Bitcoin Spot ETFs in January 2024. This projection is likely due to the common rationale that the present bullish run has been heavily supported by institutional inflows.
Source: @KillaXBT on X
Notably, the Bitcoin Spot ETFs have been central to these institutional inflows, boasting total net assets of $119.18 billion. The BlackRock IBIT holds over half of this traction as the undisputed market leader with $71.03 billion in net assets and $62.68 billion in cumulative net inflows.
If Bitcoin were to return to its pre-ETF approval price levels, it would imply an estimated 46% decline from current market prices. Such a move would likely signal a sharp reversal in institutional positioning, suggesting that sustained ETF outflows, rather than retail capitulation, could emerge as the primary catalyst for a renewed crypto winter.
At press time, Bitcoin continues to trade at $90,348, reflecting a 2.18% decline.
BTC trading at $90,373 on the daily chart | Source: BTCUSDT chart on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Pexels, chart from Tradingview
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Sign Up for Our Newsletter!
For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.
Semilore Faleti works as a crypto-journalist at Bitconist, providing the latest updates on blockchain developments, crypto regulations, and the DeFi ecosystem. He is a strong crypto enthusiast passionate about covering the growing footprint of blockchain technology in the financial world.
DeFi liquidity is becoming increasingly important as more Layer 1 networks move toward mainstream adoption. Notably, recent developments around Ripple [XRP] are directly targeting this space.
Hex Trust, a digital asset solutions firm, is launching a wrapped version of XRP, called wXRP, expanding the token’s reach into the DeFi ecosystem. Simply put, XRP liquidity is no longer confined to Ripple-led rails.
Instead, the firm has selected Solana [SOL] as the chain for wXRP, making this a textbook cross-chain move. In effect, XRP’s DeFi use case is shifting from its native L1 to Solana, allowing it to tap into deeper on-chain activity.
Source: DeFiLlama
Data from DeFiLlama backs this move, reinforcing Solana’s infrastructure.
For example, Solana’s 24H DEX volume sat at $3.9 billion at press time. That’s about 575x higher than XRPL’s $6.78 million. Consequently, shifting wXRP to Solana boosts its on-chain liquidity, making it far more usable for traders.
That said, while this move showcases Solana’s on-chain strength, it also raises questions about XRPL’s limitations. Simply put, does the wXRP launch highlight XRPL’s relative weakness in supporting DeFi activity?
wXRP launch gives XRP a strategic edge in DeFi
Ripple is making 2025 its year to push for mainstream adoption.
Primarily, by targeting the payments market, Ripple’s native token has become more liquid. But the on-chain impact is still limited. Total Value Locked (TVL) on XRPL sat at just $69 million, as of writing, slipping back to June levels.
Other metrics show a similar trend. Despite RLUSD, the total stablecoin market cap on XRPL is just $343 million. By comparison, Solana’s TVL sat at $17 billion, making it clear which L1 currently offers much deeper liquidity.
Source: DeFiLlama
In this context, Hex Trust’s wXRP launch looks like a smart strategic pivot.
With Ripple expanding financial adoption, institutional demand for XRP is on the rise, supported by ETF inflows. Against this setup, wXRP acts as a bridge, giving traders and institutions easier access to XRP liquidity.
However, by launching on Solana, the token taps into deeper liquidity, giving it a clear edge in the DeFi ecosystem, positioning it to interact with a wider range of protocols and support larger on-chain flows.
Final Thoughts
Hex Trust’s wXRP launch moves XRP liquidity from its native L1 to Solana, significantly enhancing on-chain activity.
Solana’s 24H DEX volume is roughly 575x higher than XRPL’s, giving wXRP deeper liquidity and broader protocol integration opportunities.
Ritika Gupta is a Financial Journalist and Geopolitical Analyst at AMBCrypto, specializing in the critical intersection of world politics, economic policy, and the cryptocurrency markets. Her analysis is informed by her distinguished background, which includes professional experience at major news network.
She holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and Psychology from Gargi College, University of Delhi. This academic training provides her with a sophisticated framework for dissecting complex issues such as international regulations, government fiscal policies, and the geopolitical forces that directly influence asset valuations.
At AMBCrypto, Ritika applies this expert lens to synthesize macroeconomic data and political developments, offering readers a deeper context for market movements. She excels at explaining not just what is happening in the market, but why it is happening. Her work is dedicated to providing strategic insights that empower readers to understand the complex relationship between global events and their digital assets.
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 16:464mo ago
Strategy Retains Nasdaq 100 Inclusion as MSCI Reviews Benchmark Eligibility
TLDRNasdaq 100 Index Adjustments and Market MovementsMSCI Review and Strategy’s Capital StrengthGet 3 Free Stock Ebooks
Strategy keeps its Nasdaq 100 spot despite bitcoin-focused business model concerns.
Nasdaq removes seven companies while adding six, reflecting index recalibration.
MSCI will review Strategy and similar firms for benchmark eligibility in January.
CEO Phong Le raised $1.44B in eight days to support investor confidence.
Strategy (MSTR.O), the bitcoin-focused firm formerly known as MicroStrategy, has maintained its position in the Nasdaq 100 index.
The company’s continued inclusion comes amid growing questions over its business model centered on large bitcoin holdings. Strategy’s presence in the benchmark reflects its market capitalization and ongoing role within the technology sector despite volatility in cryptocurrency markets.
The company’s approach of holding significant bitcoin reserves has drawn attention from analysts and investors alike.
Nasdaq’s technology-heavy index tracks the largest non-financial companies listed on the exchange. Strategy’s retention demonstrates that the company continues to meet the index’s inclusion criteria during routine annual reviews.
Nasdaq 100 Index Adjustments and Market Movements
Nasdaq recently removed several companies from the benchmark, including Biogen, CDW Corporation, Globalfoundries, Lululemon Athletica, On Semiconductor, and Trade Desk. These changes are scheduled to take effect on December 22 and reflect market capitalization shifts within the index.
Meanwhile, new entrants include Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Ferrovial, Insmed, Monolithic Power Systems, Seagate Technology, and Western Digital.
These additions reflect Nasdaq’s goal of maintaining a diverse mix of high-performing technology and industrial firms. Strategy’s continued presence shows that digital-asset treasury companies can remain part of the index when they meet the set standards.
Concerns persist over companies holding concentrated cryptocurrency assets, as share prices are sensitive to bitcoin price fluctuations. Nasdaq’s inclusion rules aim to balance representation with market stability, allowing Strategy to retain its spot while other companies were removed.
MSCI Review and Strategy’s Capital Strength
Global index provider MSCI will decide in January whether to exclude Strategy and similar companies from its benchmarks. MSCI has raised questions regarding the suitability of digital-asset treasury companies due to their reliance on bitcoin holdings.
Strategy CEO Phong Le highlighted the company’s ability to raise capital during market uncertainty.
According to Coin Bureau (@coinbureau), Strategy raised $1.44 billion in eight days to address concerns and show resilience during a bitcoin down cycle.
🟠STRATEGY'S STRATEGY TO ADDRESS FUD
Strategy CEO Phong Le says they raised $1.44 billion in 8 days to address the FUD and show people that they're still able to raise money during a #Bitcoin down cycle. pic.twitter.com/ydcdrPRDc7
— Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) December 13, 2025
Originally a software company, Strategy pivoted to bitcoin investing in 2020. Its inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 under the technology category began last December.
MSCI’s upcoming review will provide further clarity on whether digital-asset treasury companies can maintain benchmark eligibility globally.
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:214mo ago
Strategy Stays in Nasdaq 100 Despite Bitcoin-Focused Model
Bitcoin-heavy firm Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) will remain in the Nasdaq 100 index following the annual rebalancing, defying expectations that its unconventional, crypto-centric business model could put its inclusion at risk. The reshuffle, which removes several high-profile companies, underscores Strategy’s continued relevance among the largest non-financial firms listed on the Nasdaq.
Formerly known as MicroStrategy, the company was originally a business intelligence and software provider. In 2020, it made a dramatic strategic shift by adopting bitcoin as its primary treasury asset. Since then, Strategy has accumulated approximately 660,624 BTC, currently valued at around $59.55 billion, making it the largest corporate holder of bitcoin globally. This aggressive accumulation strategy helped propel the company into the Nasdaq 100 last December.
Unlike most companies in the index, Strategy’s stock performance is closely linked to bitcoin price movements. This tight correlation has drawn criticism from analysts who argue that the firm behaves more like a bitcoin investment vehicle than a traditional operating company. The Nasdaq 100 is designed to track major non-financial businesses, and some observers contend that if Strategy were classified as a holding company, it could become ineligible for inclusion.
Concerns around crypto treasury companies extend beyond Nasdaq. MSCI, another major index provider, has raised questions about whether firms like Strategy should be included in its benchmarks. A decision on potential exclusions is expected in January, adding uncertainty for companies whose balance sheets are heavily weighted toward digital assets.
Strategy has pushed back against these critiques, emphasizing that it remains an operating technology business with active business intelligence operations, not an investment fund. The company argues that holding bitcoin is a capital allocation strategy rather than a redefinition of its corporate identity.
In this year’s Nasdaq 100 rebalance, six companies were removed, including Biogen, Lululemon, and Trade Desk, while new additions such as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Ferrovial, and Seagate Technology were added. The updated index composition will take effect on December 22, with Strategy retaining its spot amid ongoing debate over the role of bitcoin-focused companies in major stock indexes.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:304mo ago
Robert Kiyosaki Warns Global Crash Resets Valuations as Bitcoin Stands Outside Weakening Systems
Robert Kiyosaki urges investors to prepare for long-term economic decline by using market crashes to accumulate cash-flowing assets and decentralized stores of value, arguing disciplined planning and bitcoin ownership can build wealth as traditional systems weaken.
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:354mo ago
Bitcoin Rodney hit with expanded charges in $1.8B HyperFund crypto scam
Rodney Burton, a Miami-based cryptocurrency promoter known online as “Bitcoin Rodney,” has faced a significantly expanded federal indictment in connection with his alleged role in a $1.8 billion HyperFund cryptocurrency scam, according to federal prosecutors.
Burton is now facing 11 federal counts, according to a superseding indictment brought in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, which covers the following: conspiracy to commit wire fraud, two counts of wire fraud, seven counts of money laundering, and one count of operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.
Cryptocurrency services have suffered nearly $3 billion in theft so far in 2025, making this year already more devastating than the entirety of 2024. The DPRK’s $1.5 billion hack of ByBit, the largest single hack in crypto history, accounts for the majority of service losses.
By the end of June 2025, 17% more value had been stolen year-to-date (YTD) than in 2022, previously the worst year on record. If current trends continue, stolen funds from services could eclipse $4 billion by year’s end.
Expanded federal indictment hits Bitcoin Rodney with 11 charges
If convicted on all counts, Burton faces a maximum of 20 years in prison in federal courts for the wire fraud conspiracy and each wire fraud count, plus 10 years for each money laundering count and five years for the unlicensed money transmission offense.
The charges represent a significant escalation from Burton’s original criminal complaint, filed in January 2024, which consisted of two counts linked to unlicensed money transmission, each carrying a maximum sentence of five years to be served.
Burton was arrested in January 2024 at Miami International Airport carrying a one-way ticket to the United Arab Emirates, and has been detained since a federal judge refused his bail request because he constituted an “extreme flight risk.”
$1.8B HyperFund scheme allegedly funded luxury lifestyle, not mining
From June 2020 to May 2024, Burton and his co-conspirators managed HyperFund, which prosecutors claimed was a legitimate cryptocurrency investment platform known as HyperVerse, according to court documents.
The scheme purportedly offered investors daily returns of 0.5% to 1%, intending to nearly double or triple their initial investments, claiming that investments could be made in vast crypto mining operations.
It was a facade, prosecutors say, those mining operations didn’t operate. A superseding indictment alleges that Burton spent proceeds from investors on luxury condominiums, sports cars, and a yacht. Burton’s trial is set for March of next year.
Burton maintained an enormous profile in the crypto community, hosting a 2021 Miami event featuring Shark Tank’s Daymond John and singer Akon, and made regular appearances on social media alongside notable figures like Jamie Foxx and Rick Ross. According to court documents, there has been one prior conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine.
He told court papers that he considered this a bona fide business. Co-founder and Australian entrepreneur Xue Lee, or Sam Lee, he said, constructed an “elaborate deception” to deceive both his investors and Burton himself.
Lee and promoter Brenda “Bitcoin Beautee” Chunga were charged with fraud and unregistered security offerings by the SEC in January 2024. Earlier reports indicate that Chunga has agreed to plead guilty, while Lee is still at large.
Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:004mo ago
‘No intrinsic value' – Then why does Bitcoin track RBI liquidity so closely?
Bitcoin is back in the spotlight – this time, in India!
Recent remarks from a senior Reserve Bank of India (RBI) official have started a conversation in the nation about what Bitcoin [BTC] really is… and what it isn’t.
While the comments caused backlash online, there’s more to this than you think.
The RBI’s not buying the crypto pitch
Speaking at a media event in Mumbai, RBI Deputy Governor T. Rabi Sankar made things clear. Stablecoins simply don’t pass his test of what money should be.
Source: X
He argued that, unlike sovereign currencies, stablecoins do not carry a clear promise to pay, a feature he said is central to any credible form of money. In his view, their benefits are overstated, while the risks (price instability and weaker control over monetary policy) are real.
“Beyond the facilitation of illicit payments and circumvention of capital measures, stablecoins raise significant concerns for monetary stability, fiscal policy, banking intermediation, and systemic resilience…”
Sankar also pushed back on the idea that cryptocurrencies hold inherent value. Referring to Bitcoin’s origins, he described it as a showcase of technology rather than a true currency, adding that its value is largely speculative.
The RBI continues to support the use of state-backed money, backed by global institutions like the IMF.
Crypto twitter pushes back
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:004mo ago
XRP Mirrors 2016 Trend That Led To 69% Crash Before 110,000% Rally
XRP has struggled to create any upside traction over the past few days, with the price rejecting above $2.15 in the middle of the week and now back to lingering just above the $2 level.
A new long-term technical comparison shared by crypto analyst ChartNerd places XRP’s price behavior since its July all-time high of $3.65 into an interesting context, implying that what XRP is doing now resembles a phase from its 2016 market cycle that points to an incoming huge rally.
Repeating 2016 Rejection And ABC Crash Structure
According to crypto analyst ChartNerd, XRP’s current structure matches a similar price action that unfolded in late 2016. when price rejected an accumulation supply block and rolled into an ABC corrective move. That correction ultimately produced a 69% flash-wick decline that extended into the first quarter of 2017.
The drop was severe and unfolded over several months, eventually pushing XRP to as low as $0.00240, but it eventually represented the end of the correction rather than the end of the bullish cycle.
The chart accompanying the analysis, which is shown below, highlights a similar rejection pattern forming now. This pattern is based on how the XRP price rejected at its most recent all-time high in July. Since then, the monthly price chart has been printing consecutive red candles, with monthly closes consistently below opens.
XRPUSD currently trading at $2.03. Chart: TradingView
At the time of writing, XRP is about a 44% correction from this all-time high. This means a 69% correction is yet to play out in its entirety. Therefore, if history repeats, a full 69% ABC-style move from the all-time high would drag XRP back below $1 and as low as $0.8. This move is expected to play out into the first quarter of 2026.
XRP Price Chart. Source: @ChartNerdTA
Potential Drop Could Be A Set-Up For A Much Larger Rally
XRP is currently trading at $2.04. Therefore, a deeper pullback below $1 will translate to a 51% decrease from the current price action. The idea of a deeper pullback from $2 is tough to imagine, especially given the inflows into Spot XRP ETFs. In fact, a pullback of that magnitude could test conviction across the market and cause many bullish traders to step aside.
However, the technical analysis frames it as a structural reset rather than anything else. In 2017, the post-crash consolidation laid the groundwork for one of XRP’s most explosive rallies on record, ultimately delivering gains in excess of 110,000%.
If this sequence plays out as expected, then the real bullish opportunity would develop later in 2026. From that reset zone, the chart projects a long-term advance to the 1.618 Fibonacci extension, placing a potential upside target around $27. The visual projection in the chart above shows a clean multi-month expansion zone that delivers a 2,300% gain after the corrective phase.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:004mo ago
Is It More Profitable To Hold Bitcoin For The Short-Term? 2025 Numbers Are Here
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
Bitcoin’s 2025 price action has been anything but smooth, but one group of investors has quietly dominated the year’s profit statistics. Short-term holders, which are classified as addresses holding BTC for only one to three months, spent most of the year in the green amidst the push to multiple all-time highs and ensuing drawdowns throughout the year.
On-chain data from 2025 now provides a clearer answer to whether short-term exposure to Bitcoin actually paid off for holders, even though conditions look far less comfortable at the time of writing.
Short-Term Holders Spent Most Of 2025 In Profit
According to data from on-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant, Bitcoin short-term holders were in a profitable position for roughly two-thirds of 2025. On-chain profit and loss data shows that this cohort was in profit for about 66% of trading days, which translates to about 230 trading days.
During the first half of 2025, Bitcoin’s price frequently traded above the average realized price of short-term holders, allowing recent buyers to lock in gains even as volatility remained elevated. This pattern became especially visible during mid-year rallies, when Bitcoin pushed above the $100,000 region and short-term profit margins expanded sharply.
Each time the price reclaimed levels above the short-term realized price, realized gains dominated the distribution. Back in January, Bitcoin maintained a position above the short-term cost basis for nearly two consecutive months, creating the first extended window of sustained profitability for this cohort in 2025.
A similar, and even more pronounced, phase unfolded between May and October, when short-term holders sat on substantial unrealized gains. During this period, the profit-and-loss margin climbed as high as 20 percent in July, coinciding with Bitcoin’s first breakout above $115,000. During this period, Spot Bitcoin ETFs were witnessing huge institutional inflows that cancelled out any profit-taking from short-term holders.
BTC: STH Realized Profit and Loss. Source: CryptoQuant
Current Picture Shows Short-Term Holders Underwater
That favorable backdrop has changed into losses in recent weeks. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around the low-$90,000 range, while the short-term holder realized price is just above $100,000. This places the current profit/loss margin at a loss of about 10%.
Interestingly, this margin recently fell to as low as negative 20% when the Bitcoin price broke below $85,000 in November, which is the deepest loss regime for short-term holders in 2025.
Nonetheless, the 2025 data shows that short-term holding was profitable for most of the year, but the outlook is not favorable right now. Structurally, these deep loss pockets usually show up closer to the late stages of a correction than the early ones.
Right now, the most important thing for short-term holders is for Bitcoin to reclaim the short-term realized price and push back above $100,000. Until then, short-term holders will stay under pressure, even with the yearly statistics leaning in their favor.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 21:004mo ago
Ethereum Holds Support As Smart Money Steps In – What This Means For Price
Ethereum is holding firm above key support as smart money steps in, hinting at growing confidence beneath the surface. With bullish signals and steady inflows aligning, the market now watches whether this stability can spark a meaningful upside move.
ETH Coils Below $3,200 Ahead Of A Decisive Move
AltCoin Việt Nam, in a recent post, highlighted that ETH is positioned at an extremely tense moment on its chart, signaling that the asset is preparing for a major directional move. This immediate pressure is being fueled by a significant bullish divergence that has just appeared on the chart, marking the first time the signal has materialized in over a month.
The analyst reinforced the expectation of high volatility by referencing historical data. Their research shows a consistent history of 9–16% price volatility whenever ETH falls below the $3,200 level. Given that the price is currently fluctuating tightly around the $3,100 mark, this historical context provides a clear signal that a sharp volatility explosion may be imminent.
Adding overwhelming conviction to the bullish case is the recent action of market movers. AltCoin Việt Nam reported that a single super large whale just opened a leveraged long position totaling a massive $392 million (equivalent to 120,094 ETH). This colossal bet on the upside demonstrates a firm, high-conviction among institutional players.
Source: Chart from AltCoin Việt Nam on X
Furthermore, the institutional framework continues to provide a reliable underlying demand. The Spot Ethereum ETF market is still actively attracting substantial capital inflows, totaling over $250 million this week. BitMine Technologies also purchased an additional 33,504 ETH (valued at $112 million) today, highlighting persistent institutional accumulation.
Considering the confluence of technical divergence, historical volatility context, and massive whale and institutional purchasing, the market faces a critical juncture. AltCoin Việt Nam posed the final question: Can ETH break out strongly and immediately confirm the uptrend, or will it need to retest lower support levels before initiating the expected explosive rally?
Buyers Step In As Ethereum Defends Key Support
According to crypto analyst The Boss, ETH has shown a highly encouraging response from a key technical area. Ethereum has reacted positively with the $3,091 support zone, and is currently holding firmly above this level, which is a strong signal that short-term buying pressure remains resilient and active in the market.
As long as the price stays above the green line, the analyst confirms that the primary focus remains the upside, validating the potential for a move toward the resistance zone marked by the blue line. The Boss emphasized the importance of these structural defense moves, concluding that such strong reactions from established support levels are vital signals for confirming the validity of the current structure and providing clear direction of the prevailing trend.
ETH trading at $3,122 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com
2025-12-14 02:244mo ago
2025-12-13 21:074mo ago
Long-term Bitcoin holders drive market lower with covered call tactics
Jeff Park, a prominent market analyst and investment manager currently serving as the Chief Investment Officer (CIO) at ProCap BTC, says that long-term Bitcoin holders, often referred to as “whales” or “OGs,” are increasingly selling covered calls. In this strategy, they sell call options against a large existing holding, such as BTC and ETH, to generate extra income or yield.
These options grant the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to purchase an asset at a predetermined price in the future, while the seller retains a profit. Park argued that this practice gives rise to a drastic drop in the price of spot BTC.
Park blames BTC OGs for recent price declines in the crypto market
Regarding Park’s argument, sources highlighted that these major Bitcoin holders establish substantial sell-side pressure via their covered call strategy. On the other hand, they noted that market makers, who play a significant role in purchasing these covered calls, are on the other side of this trade.
Therefore, this calls for an urgency for them to safeguard themselves by engaging in activities such as selling spot BTC to cover their position. This, in turn, lowers market prices, although analysts discovered a deep interest from traditional ETF investors.
Meanwhile, recent reports have revealed that the BTC designed to support these options has been held for several years and does not demonstrate the presence of new demands or fresh liquidity in the market. As a result, these calls bring about a reduction in prices.
To further elaborate on this point, Park mentioned that, “When you already own Bitcoin that you’ve had for over 10 years and start selling calls against it, only the act of selling calls adds new delta to the market—and that delta is negative—so you end up being a net seller of delta when you sell calls.”
His analysis suggested that the option market has a significant influence on the price of Bitcoin. He also suggested that there is a high likelihood that this price will continue to fluctuate as long as whales continue to make short-term profits, particularly from their BTC holdings by selling covered calls.
Meanwhile, it is worth noting that the cryptocurrency separated from the stock market in the latter half of 2025. At this time, some analysts expressed their belief that Bitcoin is closely tied to tech stocks. Moreover, while stocks continued to reach their highest point, BTC significantly declined to approximately $90,000.
Analysts express their belief that Bitcoin will begin to rise again
Several analysts have shared their forecasts that Bitcoin will begin to surge again when the US Federal Reserve continues to implement interest rate cuts and allocate additional funds into the financial system. According to them, this move could indicate a positive sign for risky investments.
Following their prediction, data from CME Group’s FedWatch tool indicated that approximately 24.4% of traders anticipated that the US Federal Reserve could consider another rate cut at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting scheduled for January next year.
However, some analysts speculated that BTC might experience a decline to reach a record low of $76,000, arguing that its upward trend has already come to an end.
The analysts made this assumption after trader Roman, with the username @Roman_Trading, shared an X post on Thursday of this week, publicly displaying his recent analysis and informing his followers to prepare for an additional 17% decline in Bitcoin’s price.
Following his statement, sources acknowledged that BTC/USD has been facing difficulties in bouncing back after reaching its recent lows close to $80,000. They argued that instead, it is moving within a channel that slopes upwards.
Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:054mo ago
Nvidia's AI Dominance Is Still Building. Could the Stock Go Even Higher?
Another gain of almost 1,500% is unlikely, and this could change how shareholders view the stock.
When it comes to artificial intelligence (AI) stocks, Nvidia (NVDA 3.27%) seems unstoppable. Despite rising by nearly 1,500% from its low in October 2022, the increasing demand for AI continues to bolster Nvidia, which remains the dominant company for AI accelerators.
Still, its market cap now stands at almost $4.5 trillion after blowing past the $5 trillion mark in November. Since large companies tend to grow at a slower pace, smaller companies might appear more attractive to growth investors.
Knowing this, can the stock go higher, or should investors rotate out of Nvidia in favor of other tech names?
Image source: Nvidia.
The power of Nvidia's dominance
When it comes to a mix of growth and safety, one might struggle to find a stock better positioned than Nvidia. It's the dominant player in the AI accelerator market, and it is dealing with insatiable demand for its product.
Moreover, that demand is likely to remain strong. Between 2024 and 2030, Grand View Research estimates a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the AI chip market of 29%. Nvidia continues to far exceed that, and in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 (ended Oct. 26), its $57 billion in revenue was up 62% from year-ago levels.
Furthermore, its data center segment, which designs the AI accelerators, makes up about 90% of the company's revenue. That segment reported more than $51 billion in revenue in the same quarter, rising by 66% over the last year.
Keeping up with the rapid demand led to a 71% rise in the cost of revenue. Thus, the company's $32 billion in net income increased by 65%, closely approximating the growth of its revenue.
Still, the 56% net profit margins place Nvidia in an enviable position. Thanks to those profits, it has had adequate funds to continue spending on innovation and other investments.
Nvidia's stock dilemma
Given that staggering level of financial growth, it is highly likely that the stock will continue to rise.
And that creates a challenge for shareholders. The $4.5 trillion market cap is the world's largest, but it can also be a headwind for growth investors.
For the stock to rise by 100%, its market cap would have to grow to $9 trillion. As of today, no stock has yet reached the $6 trillion mark. As previously mentioned, its financial growth should take Nvidia's stock to that point over time, but it makes a repeat of the nearly 1,500% gains achieved over the past 38 months highly improbable.
Today's Change
(
-3.27
%) $
-5.91
Current Price
$
175.02
Knowing this, growth investors may deploy more capital to the stock of competitors like AMD, whose market cap is a comparatively modest $360 billion and -- according to many analysts -- is closing the technical gap with Nvidia, which might make it more attractive.
Fortunately, Nvidia could mitigate this challenge by developing a larger following among more-conservative investors. They would have to stomach the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 46, higher than the S&P 500 average of 31.
Still, such investors could benefit from the chipmaker's high degree of safety and rapid growth. Even with possible size-related headwinds, the company stands a good chance of beating market averages, which could still make it attractive to many types of investors.
Moving forward with Nvidia stock
Ultimately, the stock is going to continue to move higher, if only because of its huge growth. The more meaningful question is what kind of investor is going to want it at current levels.
Its huge market cap could become a headwind, since such a size is going to make another 1,500% gain over three years highly unlikely. That may lead growth investors into other stocks.
However, for more conservative investors, the rapid growth and stability of Nvidia could make it attractive. Assuming they can stomach a higher-than-average P/E, they can benefit from faster growth at a lower risk.
In the end, no matter how investors perceive Nvidia, it is likely that the demand for AI will continue to make it a market-beating stock for some time to come.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:154mo ago
Got $1,000? 1 Tech Stock to Buy and Hold for Decades
This company has one of the most visited online platforms.
Reddit (RDDT 3.75%) is one of the fastest-growing social platforms, with 116 million daily active users. It is the third-most-visited site in the U.S., just behind YouTube.
If you have $1,000 to invest, this growth stock could be a rewarding investment that grows in value over the next few decades.
Image source: Getty Images.
Why buy Reddit stock
It's a great sign that Reddit's advertising revenue continues to grow at a significantly faster rate than its daily active user base. Reddit is experiencing strong growth, with daily active users increasing by 19% year over year in the last quarter. This translated to an impressive 68% year-over-year increase in advertising revenue, and there's a good explanation for this growth.
"Reddit" is one of the most frequently searched keywords on Alphabet's Google. People are specifically seeking out Reddit to find helpful answers on various topics, including product reviews. This also means Reddit is attracting people who may have high purchase intent when shopping, which is valuable to advertisers. This makes Reddit unique in the social media landscape, and the company is clearly monetizing its user base effectively.
Today's Change
(
-3.75
%) $
-8.76
Current Price
$
224.78
Stocks can be volatile from year to year, but over the long term, they tend to track the growth of a company's profits. Analysts expect the company's earnings per share to grow at an annualized rate of 42% in the coming years. This represents more than enough growth to potentially turn a $1,000 investment in Reddit into $2,000 by 2030. If Reddit someday has 1 billion users on its platform, that could spell several thousand dollars in investment value in the coming decades.
John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool recommends Reddit. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
With over three times as many holdings, VOOG spreads its bets across more sectors, while MGK leans heavily into tech giants.
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK 1.51%) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG 1.66%) share the same low expense ratio and issuer, but differ in portfolio breadth, sector tilts, and dividend yield.
Both funds aim to give investors exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks, but while MGK zeroes in on the largest names in the market, VOOG casts a wider net across the S&P 500’s growth segment. Here’s how these two compare for investors weighing focus versus breadth.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricMGKVOOGIssuerVanguardVanguardExpense ratio0.07%0.07%1-yr return (as of Dec. 12, 2025)15.7%17.5%Dividend yield0.4%0.5%AUM$33.0 billion$21.7 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
Both funds are equally affordable with matching 0.07% expense ratios, but VOOG’s yield edges out MGK’s , offering a slightly higher payout for investors seeking a touch more income.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricMGKVOOGMax drawdown (5 y)(36.4%)(33.1%)Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,083$1,978What's insideVanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF holds 217 stocks, offering broader diversification across the growth portion of the S&P 500. Technology companies make up 44% of assets, with communication services and consumer cyclical sectors also playing significant roles at 15% and 12%, respectively. Its largest positions are NVIDIA (NVDA 3.27%) at 15.3%, Microsoft (MSFT 1.04%) at 6.2%, and Apple (AAPL +0.04%) at 5.7%. VOOG has a fund history spanning 15.3 years and currently avoids concentrated sector or single-stock risk.
The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF, by contrast, is more concentrated with just 66 holdings and 69% of assets in technology. Its top three positions—NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft—collectively account for over 38% of the portfolio. While both funds are managed by Vanguard and avoid leverage or other structural quirks, MGK’s narrower focus results in higher potential exposure to swings in the tech sector.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsSome ETFs are so similar that it's difficult to find any differences at all, and that's mostly the case with VOOG and MGK. Both of these funds are offered by Vanguard, which is known for its low fees. These two funds are no exception, with both carrying a reasonable 0.07% expense ratio. Both funds also have a heavy emphasis on some of the largest companies in the public markets.
So, how should investors distinguish between these funds to make an informed decision on where to invest? It comes down to the degree of exposure desired to the top holdings in the funds. Both have a large exposure to the technology sector, but MGK is even more heavily tipped toward technology.
While Nvidia is the top holding in both funds at approximately 15% of AUM, the next two largest holdings, Microsoft and Apple, make up a larger percentage in MGK than in VOOG.
With almost every other difference between these funds being negligible, it is this tech exposure that truly differentiates them. As a result, potential investors should focus on this aspect when deciding between the two.
GlossaryExpense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges to cover operating costs.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund, expressed as a percentage of its current share price.
Sector diversification: Distribution of a fund's investments across different industries or sectors to reduce risk.
Beta: A measure of a fund's volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of all assets managed by a fund.
Max drawdown: The largest percentage drop from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Growth of $1,000: The ending value of a $1,000 investment over a set period, showing total return.
Large-cap: Companies with a large market capitalization, usually over $10 billion.
Holdings: The individual stocks or assets that make up a fund’s portfolio.
Concentration risk: The risk of significant losses due to heavy investment in a single sector or a few assets.
Leverage: The use of borrowed money or financial instruments to increase potential returns, often increasing risk.
Jeff Santoro has positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:244mo ago
A Once-in-a-Decade Investment Opportunity: 1 Vanguard Index Fund to Buy for the AI Boom
U.S. electricity demand could reach levels not seen in decades as artificial intelligence data centers proliferate.
U.S. electricity demand stagnated during the past two decades because of the introduction of energy-efficient technologies like LED lightbulbs and modern appliances. Between 2005 and 2024, electricity consumption rose at just 0.5% annually, and the utilities sector underperformed the S&P 500 (^GSPC 1.07%) by 210 percentage points.
However, Goldman Sachs estimates U.S. electricity consumption will increase at 2.4% annually through 2030 as three major tailwinds converge: electrification of vehicles and industrial equipment, increased domestic manufacturing activity, and the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers.
Electricity consumption has not increased so quickly since the internet went mainstream in the late 1990s. In that sense, the utilities sector looks more attractive today than it has in decades. Investors can position their portfolios to benefit by owning shares of the Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU 0.55%).
Here are the important details.
Image source: Getty Images.
The Vanguard Utilities ETF provides exposure to leading power generators and electric suppliers
The Vanguard Utilities ETF tracks the performance of 69 U.S. utility companies. The index fund is most heavily weighted toward electric utilities (63%), but it also provides exposure to gas (5%), water (3%), and multi-utility companies (23%), as well as independent power producers (6%). These are 10 largest holdings as listed by weight:
NextEra Energy: 10.9%
Constellation Energy: 7.7%
Southern Company: 6.5%
Duke Energy: 6.3%
American Electric Power: 4.2%
Vistra Energy: 4.1%
Sempra Energy: 3.9%
Dominion Energy: 3.2%
Xcel Energy: 3%
Exelon: 3%
Three of the 10 stocks above have outperformed the S&P 500 year to date. Constellation Energy, Vistra, and American Electric Power. Investors have good reason to believe that outperformance will continue as the artificial intelligence (AI) boom unfolds:
Constellation is the largest producer of zero-carbon energy and the leading competitive retail supplier of power in the U.S. The stock has advanced 69% year to date.
Vistra is the leading competitive power producer and the second-largest competitive retail supplier of power in the U.S. The stock has advanced 27% year to date.
American Electric Power is one of the largest regulated power producers and it owns the largest electricity transmission network in the U.S. The stock has advanced 24% year to date.
The Vanguard Utilities ETF has an expense ratio of 0.09%, meaning shareholders will pay $9 per year on every $10,000 invested in the fund. The average expense ratio on similar funds is 1.01%, according to Vanguard.
Today's Change
(
-0.55
%) $
-1.03
Current Price
$
186.01
This Vanguard Utilities ETF is best owned alongside other AI stocks and index funds
The Vanguard Utilities ETF achieved a total return of 180% during the last decade, which is equivalent to 10.8% annually. By comparison, the S&P 500 achieved a total return of 299% during the last decade, which is equivalent to 14.8% annually. The same pattern holds over the past two decades.
I think the utilities sector can outperform the S&P 500 during the next five years, but investors hoping to benefit from the artificial intelligence revolution should still build a diversified portfolio by spreading money across other stocks and/or index funds. I think most investors should own an S&P 500 index fund such as the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF.
The S&P 500 tracks the most influential stocks in the world, many of which will benefit from AI to some degree. In fact, over 60% of companies in the index discussed artificial intelligence on the latest earnings call, according to FactSet Research. That is a new record high.
More importantly, the S&P 500 has been profitable over every 15-year period since 1950. In other words, any investor who owned an S&P 500 index fund turned a profit regardless of when they bought shares provided they held the fund for at least 15 years. That makes an S&P 500 index fund a compelling investment idea.
Trevor Jennewine has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Constellation Energy, FactSet Research Systems, Goldman Sachs Group, and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Dominion Energy and Duke Energy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 18:424mo ago
VGT vs. FTEC: How These Two Similar Tech ETFs Compare on Risk, Performance, and Scale
With similar holdings and costs, the real difference between these tech ETFs lies in their scale and trading flexibility.
The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT 2.89%) and the Fidelity MSCI Information Technology ETF (FTEC 2.90%) offer very similar sector exposure and costs, but VGT stands out for holding more stocks and trading with higher liquidity.
Both VGT and FTEC track the U.S. technology sector, aiming to provide diversified exposure to leading companies in the space. With nearly identical sector allocations and performance, the choice may come down to factors like assets under management (AUM), trading volume, and brand preference.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricFTECVGTIssuerFidelityVanguardExpense ratio0.08%0.09%1-yr return (as of Dec. 11, 2025)23.31%23.06%Dividend yield0.40%0.41%Beta (5Y monthly)1.321.33AUM$16.7 billion$130.0 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
The difference in fees is negligible, with FTEC being marginally more affordable at 0.08% versus 0.09%. Both funds currently offer roughly the same dividend yield, so cost and payout are essentially equal for most investors.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricFTECVGTMax drawdown (5 y)-34.95%-35.08%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,313$2,292What's insideVGT delivers exposure to U.S. technology stocks with a portfolio of 314 holdings. Its largest positions are Nvidia, making up 18.18% of the fund's total assets, Apple at 14.29%, and Microsoft at 12.93%. With a fund age of close to 22 years and no notable quirks, VGT offers broad coverage and deep liquidity.
FTEC is similarly concentrated, with top holdings of Nvidia at 16.61%, Apple at 15.31%, and Microsoft at 12.42%. The main difference is FTEC's slightly smaller roster of 289 stocks and its shorter track record of around 12 years.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsVGT and FTEC are similar in many ways. They both provide exposure to all corners of the tech industry, with the same top three holdings.
Their dividend yields and expense ratios are close to identical, and they've earned incredibly similar returns over the last 12 months and the past five years. With similar betas and max drawdowns, they've also experienced roughly the same levels of volatility. VGT contains a few more stocks than FTEC, however, making it marginally more diversified.
The most significant difference between these two ETFs is their AUM. VGT is significantly larger, with an AUM of around $130 billion compared to just under $17 billion for FTEC.
AUM may not make a meaningful difference for long-term investors who don't plan on selling their investment anytime soon. However, a higher AUM can result in greater liquidity, making it easier to buy and sell. Again, AUM may not be a dealbreaker for many long-term ETF investors, but as one of the few differentiators between these very similar funds, it's a factor to consider.
GlossaryETF: Exchange-traded fund; a fund that trades on stock exchanges, holding a basket of securities.
Expense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges to cover operating costs.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock, expressed as a percentage of its price.
Beta: A measure of a fund's volatility compared to the overall market, often the S&P 500.
AUM: Assets under management; the total market value of assets a fund manages.
Max drawdown: The largest percentage drop from a fund's peak value to its lowest point over a period.
Sector exposure: The proportion of a fund's assets invested in specific industry sectors.
Liquidity: How easily a fund or security can be bought or sold without affecting its price.
Fund age: The length of time since a fund was launched.
Issuer: The company or financial institution that creates and manages an ETF or mutual fund.
Total return: The investment's price change plus all dividends and distributions, assuming those payouts are reinvested.
Portfolio holdings: The individual securities or assets that make up a fund's investment portfolio.
Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard Information Technology ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:004mo ago
Move Over D-Wave, Alphabet Is Taking Over Quantum Computing
D-Wave is a promising pure play, but Alphabet's resources could position it to be a bigger quantum-computing winner.
D-Wave Quantum has been making waves in the quantum-computing space. The company's focus on quantum-annealing technologies have enabled it to achieve more rapid commercialization compared to many other pure-play companies in the space, and the business has been posting encouraging sales growth that could point to explosive long-term opportunities.
In the third quarter, D-Wave's revenue roughly doubled to reach $3.7 million. Meanwhile, sales across the first three quarters of the year came in at $21.8 million -- representing annual growth of 235%. Despite encouraging growth and mounting real-world applications for its quantum tech, investors could be better served by investing in a much larger player in the space.
Image source: Getty Images.
This tech giant could be one of quantum computing's biggest winners
D-Wave's quantum-annealing tech platform is further down the commercialization pathway compared to the universal gate-based quantum computers favored by Rigetti Computing and some other players. While the overall progression of the quantum-computing industry over the next decade remains highly speculative, D-Wave's approach appears to be delivering a balance that provides usefulness in current real-world applications and the potential for explosive growth with new tech breakthroughs. On the other hand, D-Wave stock is still an incredibly speculative, high-risk play.
While pure plays like D-Wave and Rigetti could deliver massive gains if their respective technologies take off, investors shouldn't sleep on Alphabet's (GOOG 1.03%) (GOOGL 1.03%) potential to be a massive quantum-computing winner. In addition to having capital and computing resources that dramatically exceed smaller players in the category, the tech giant has already been posting eye-catching tech breakthroughs that suggest it's at the forefront of the category.
Today's Change
(
-1.03
%) $
-3.21
Current Price
$
309.22
Last year, Alphabet's Google Quantum AI unit unveiled its Willow chip -- a quantum-computing processor that was able to significantly reduce the incidence of errors as more qubits were added. With the Willow chip, Alphabet has been able to solve specialized problems in less than five minutes that would have been effectively impossible for other top supercomputers.
Through continued testing and iteration of the Willow chip, Google Quantum AI recently announced that it had achieved another major breakthrough. While quantum computing technologies offer far superior results for some very specialized applications, continued advancements are needed before the tech will have widespread real-world use cases. But Google's October announcement that it ran a verifiable algorithm on Willow-based hardware 13,000 times faster than would be possible on even the world's fastest classical supercomputers suggests that Alphabet could have big advantages when it comes to launching and scaling real-world quantum applications.
Given Alphabet's massive resources and ability to integrate quantum-computing technologies across its existing tech stack, the company could be one of the smartest plays for investors seeking exposure to the quantum trend.
Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:254mo ago
Are AutoZone (AZO) Stock Investors Happy, or Did They Miss Out?
AutoZone shares have crushed the S&P 500 in the past five years. The products this company sells register durable demand, making it a safe holding in any economic situation.
Iren's massive Microsoft partnership could ignite one of the strongest AI growth stories of the decade, and investors need to see what happens next.
Iren (IREN 8.67%) is racing to become a significant force in AI cloud computing, backed by a huge Microsoft contract and rapid GPU expansion. This video breaks down the bullish case, the staggering revenue targets, and the potential upside if the company executes.
Stock prices used were the market prices of Dec. 2, 2025. The video was published on Dec. 7, 2025.
Rick Orford has positions in Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rick Orford is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through their link, they will earn some extra money that supports their channel. Their opinions remain their own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.
Strategy stock is down 35% this year, despite Bitcoin's token price being flat. What comes next?
Strategy (MSTR 3.74%) pulled off an incredible comeback by betting big on Bitcoin. The company, which was formerly known as "MicroStrategy," pivoted to investing heavily in Bitcoin in response to soft performance for its legacy software businesses.
Led by CEO Michael Saylor, the company pioneered the Bitcoin treasury strategy. By selling stock and issuing bonds, the crypto-investment specialist was able to raise funds that it then used to buy Bitcoin. Thanks to a stellar bull run for the market-leading cryptocurrency over the last five years, Strategy has been able to deliver fantastic returns for shareholders.
Image source: Getty Images.
Over the last five years, Strategy stock has surged roughly 556% -- a performance that significantly exceeds Bitcoin's gain of 414% across the stretch. On the other hand, the stock has been significantly underperforming Bitcoin this year.
Is Strategy's red-hot run drawing to a close?
Despite some periods of elevated volatility, Bitcoin's token price is now roughly flat across 2025's trading. Meanwhile, Strategy stock is down approximately 35% over the stretch.
Strategy's moves to issue stock and take on debt in order to fund Bitcoin purchases have allowed it to post incredible gains in periods when the cryptocurrency's valuation is marching higher. The company's balance sheet is heavily weighted toward Bitcoin holdings, and its market capitalization has tended to post moves that are directionally aligned with the cryptocurrency's token price.
By selling new stock and using the funds to buy Bitcoin, Strategy has typically been able to post outsized gains amid bullish momentum for Bitcoin. Essentially, the company has been able to sell investors newly issued stakes in its Bitcoin treasury -- and then use that money to increase the total number of tokens that it holds.
Today's Change
(
-3.74
%) $
-6.85
Current Price
$
176.45
Based on the assumption that the projected growth outlook for Bitcoin can handily surpass the dilutive effect of selling new stock, many investors have been willing to buy into Strategy stock and send its share price rocketing higher over the last decade. On the other hand, the huge sell-off that has occurred for Strategy stock in 2025 even as Bitcoin has traded flat year to date highlights the risks inherent to this approach.
If Bitcoin's pricing momentum returns to a strong bullish phase, it's reasonable to expect that Strategy stock will enjoy a dramatic rebound. Conversely, the company's share price could plummet if Bitcoin loses ground or even trades roughly flat over the next year.
At its current pricing level, Strategy stock may offer significantly greater upside compared to Bitcoin -- but it also comes with much greater risk. With the crypto market facing some substantial macroeconomic and geopolitical risk factors on the heels of a big valuation run-up over the last five years, investors may be better served by simply investing in Bitcoin, rather than trying to score extra gains with Strategy.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 19:594mo ago
Paramount Skydance is tapping Middle-Eastern investors in hostile bid for Warner Bros. Discovery
The Warner Bros. logo is displayed at Warner Bros. Studio on December 5, 2025 in Burbank, California.
Getty Images
Why does Paramount Skydance need the Persian Gulf to finance its bid for Warner Bros. Discovery?
It’s a niggling question that hasn’t gone away for Paramount Skydance owners David and Larry Ellison, the son-and-father duo now scrambling to persuade shareholders of the company, known as WBD, to sell the media giant to them instead of Netflix.
As most of the investing world knows by now, the WBD board rebuffed the Ellisons’ all-cash $30-a-share bid to buy all of WBD, instead picking a $27.75-a-share offer from Netflix for the Warner Bros. studio and the HBO Max streaming app. Their plan is to separately sell WBD’s cable properties for an extra few dollars a share in a deal they claim is effectively worth $30.75 a share. The Ellisons are appealing to shareholders directly, going “hostile,” and arguing their bid is and was superior.
They’ve ripped the Netflix deal as risky not only from a regulatory standpoint (lots of potentially antitrust-laden overlap), but also in terms of how much it values those cable properties including CNN, saying the implied $3 a share looks optimistic.
Meanwhile, read the fine print of the Paramount Skydance bid, sources close to WBD counter: Larry Ellison — the Oracle co-founder whose net worth of $243 billion makes him the No. 3 richest person in the world — has relatively little skin in the game to finance son David’s proposal to buy the owner of Warner Bros., HBO and CNN for $78 billion in cash.
The Oracle co-founder is for now said to be ponying up just $12 billion — less than 5% of his fortune — to make the megadeal happen. Meanwhile, a trio of Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds has pledged twice that amount — a disclosure that was sure to raise eyebrows about foreign interests controlling US media assets.
More From Charles Gasparino
It’s also a thread that’s being tugged at by people close to wily WBD CEO David Zaslav, and Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos as they lobby investors for their $72 billion deal for the Warner Bros. studio and HBO Max streaming app and to ignore the hostile stuff coming from the Ellisons.
Sore losers
To hear it from WBD and Netflix, the Ellisons are sore losers who might not have the money they say they do. Most of Larry’s net worth is tied up in shares of Oracle, which have been getting crushed in recent weeks amid the AI market selloff.
Why else would they invite scrutiny by going to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE for dough?
Larry Ellison, chairman of Oracle Corporation and chief technology officer, watches from the stands at the BNP Paribas Open tennis tournament Wednesday, Oct. 13, 2021, in Indian Wells, Calif. AP
The Ellisons have their own sharp elbows, arguing for example that the WBD board didn’t give their offer a full and fair hearing, the spun-out cable assets are worth no more than a buck a share, and that’s why they need to go hostile. Either way, the dueling narratives have turned a bidding war into a fat cat fight for the ages as some of the most powerful executives slug it out for control of one of the world’s great media properties.
As the battle raged, eyes focused last week on something called the Lawrence J. Ellison Revocable Trust, which is the repository of Larry’s fortune. In particular, WBD’s board said it favored Netflix because it was concerned about the “revocable” part and, reportedly, that Paramount Skydance wanted a $2.8 billion limit on damages should it bail out of the deal.
Plea to shareholders
In a letter to WBD shareholders, Paramount Skydance countered: “Any concern that the Trust would take any steps to avoid its obligations (i.e., commit fraud) is meritless and, if such a concern is ever directly raised with the Trust, we will happily address it in the paperwork.”
The Middle East money, they claim, is a positive, not a negative. They tout these as three of the world’s most sophisticated sovereign wealth funds. They also have debt financing from Bank of America and PE giant Apollo, and cash from a hedge fund run by President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
Famed media investor Mario Gabelli, a Paramount Skydance shareholder, is among those who have pledged their WBD shares to the Ellisons’ tender because he likes the cash part and really doesn’t care that it came from the likes of the Saudis.
Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison speaks during the Bloomberg Screentime conference in Los Angeles on October 9, 2025. AFP via Getty Images
Consider: The Ellisons’ initial bid was both cash and stock worth $19 a share. To entice Zas, the Ellisons and RedBird Capital went all cash at ever higher numbers and increased the cash portion to 100%.
The Middle East money came after Larry Ellison’s bank started taking a big hit; he’s lost more than $150 billion in paper wealth since the bidding war began.
To hear the Ellisons tell it, the Persian Gulf players are paying up for their vision of a merged company that will leverage some of the best media assets in the world.
On the other side, of course, there’s plenty of sneering about what these oil-rich kingdoms are really angling for — like influence over the US media whether they have voting shares or not.
Of course, investors don’t seem to mind all the mudslinging because shares of WBD are up 150% since the bidding war began.
2025-12-14 01:244mo ago
2025-12-13 20:104mo ago
BBCA: This Fund Is A Better Way To Invest In Canadian Equities
SummaryJPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) offers broad Canadian equity exposure with a focus on large and mid-cap stocks.Bank shares are rising due to higher trading volumes and profits.Canada's export landscape is diversifying, and employment trends are improving, supporting a constructive outlook for Canadian equities.Cost efficiency is a key differentiator for BBCA, making it a compelling alternative to higher-fee peers. mirceax/iStock via Getty Images
Main Thesis & Background The purpose of this article is to evaluate the JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) as an investment option at its current market price. This is a fund that is
Analyst’s Disclosure:I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of EWC, BBCA either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.