Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Ripple settled a tokenized Treasury with JPMorgan in five seconds, expanded a stablecoin deal across Latin America, and powered remittances to 170 million people. The catch for XRP holders: the cash leg in deal after deal is RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar stablecoin, not XRP. Here is whether the token they hold is being quietly sidelined by the company built around it.

Summary

Ripple’s biggest recent wins, a five-second tokenized Treasury settlement with JPMorgan and Mastercard, a stablecoin expansion across Latin America, and a major remittance deal, increasingly use RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar stablecoin, as the cash leg rather than XRP. RLUSD crossed $1 billion in market value quickly and is becoming the settlement asset enterprises actually want, raising the question of whether it is taking the role XRP was built to play. The pattern reflects a real tension: Ripple the company keeps winning institutional deals, while XRP the token stays pinned near a dollar, beneath every major moving average. The bullish counterargument is that Ripple is the largest XRP holder with aligned incentives, that RLUSD and XRP serve different functions, and that ledger activity can still benefit XRP indirectly. For holders, the question is whether XRP’s value will accrue from network usage and catalysts like the CLARITY Act and ETF flows, or whether RLUSD will capture the settlement demand XRP was meant to capture. In June 2026, Ripple completed something that should have been a milestone for XRP. Working with JPMorgan, Mastercard, and the tokenization firm Ondo Finance, it settled the cross-border redemption of a tokenized U.S. Treasury fund across banks on the XRP Ledger, and the blockchain leg finalized in under five seconds, against the one to three business days the same transaction can take on traditional rails. It was a genuine showcase of what Ripple’s technology can do, the kind of institutional validation the XRP community has predicted for years.

NEW: JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance and Ripple complete tokenized Treasury redemption test on XRP Ledger. Settlement took roughly 5 seconds compared to 3 to 5 business days on traditional rails pic.twitter.com/9Rkd3MkWF4

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) June 12, 2026 And yet there was a detail in it that has become the defining unease for XRP holders: the cash leg of that settlement used RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, not XRP. The same pattern has repeated across Ripple’s other recent wins. A partnership expanding stablecoin settlement across Latin America runs on a regulated peso-backed stablecoin issued on the XRP Ledger and integrated with Ripple’s infrastructure, while a major remittance deal reaching 170 million people uses RLUSD as the primary settlement asset. Deal after deal, Ripple keeps winning, and deal after deal, the asset doing the actual settling is increasingly a stablecoin, while XRP trades near a dollar and change as though none of it is happening.

This is the question that has moved to the center of the XRP story, and it is a fair and uncomfortable one: if every Ripple win runs on RLUSD rather than XRP, is the token being quietly sidelined by the very company built around it? The concern is not baseless, because it touches the oldest puzzle in the XRP thesis, the gap between Ripple’s corporate success and XRP’s token price, and gives it a specific, mechanical explanation. But it is also not the whole story, because there are real counterarguments about why RLUSD and XRP are not simply competitors, why Ripple’s incentives remain aligned with holders, and how ledger activity can still benefit the token.

This piece works through both sides honestly. It lays out the pattern of RLUSD showing up where holders expected XRP, explains what RLUSD is and why enterprises prefer it for settlement, examines whether the stablecoin is cannibalizing XRP’s intended role, presents the bullish case that the two assets are complementary, and arrives at a grounded view of what holders should actually take from it. The goal is neither to stoke the fear nor to dismiss it, but to give holders an accurate read on whether their token is being left behind.

The pattern: RLUSD where holders expected XRP Start with the pattern itself, because it is real and worth seeing clearly across the recent run of Ripple announcements. The flagship example is the tokenized Treasury settlement with JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo Finance. For years, the XRP pitch held that cross-border institutional settlement was exactly what XRP was built for, the bridge asset that would let value move between currencies and institutions in seconds. When Ripple finally delivered a marquee demonstration of that capability, settling a tokenized Treasury redemption across borders and banks in under five seconds, the XRP Ledger provided the rails, but RLUSD provided the cash leg.

That detail matters because it changes what the event proved. It proved that the XRP Ledger can support serious institutional flows, with names that compliance departments recognize and a settlement speed legacy rails cannot match. But it did not prove that XRP the asset sits at the center of the payment, because the money leg moved through a stablecoin rather than the volatile token. As previously reported, Ripple’s tokenized Treasury settlement with JPMorgan showed that the ledger can win important business before the token captures meaningful demand.

The same shape recurs elsewhere. Ripple expanded a payments partnership in which a regulated peso-backed stablecoin is issued on the XRP Ledger and integrated into Ripple’s payment infrastructure to support enterprise stablecoin settlement across Latin America. Ripple also backed Flutterwave in a round that valued the African payments company at $3.2 billion, with RLUSD positioned for use across payment rails that reach a very large user base. In each case, the XRP Ledger and Ripple’s infrastructure become more relevant, but the settlement asset is a stablecoin.

Across these deals, the consistent feature is that the XRP Ledger, the blockchain Ripple built and that XRP is native to, is doing real and valuable work, but the asset moving through it as money is increasingly a stablecoin rather than XRP. This is what gives the holder concern its force: it is not a single anomalous deal but a repeated pattern in which Ripple’s institutional wins showcase the ledger and the company’s technology while routing the actual settlement value through RLUSD or another stablecoin. For holders who bought XRP on the thesis that institutional settlement demand would drive token demand, watching that settlement demand flow through a stablecoin instead is a legitimate cause for unease. The first honest step is simply to acknowledge that the pattern is real.

What RLUSD is and why enterprises prefer it To judge whether this pattern is a problem, you have to understand what RLUSD is and why enterprises keep choosing it, because the answer explains the dynamic without requiring any conspiracy against XRP. RLUSD is Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, a token designed to hold a steady value of $1, backed by reserves, and issued on the XRP Ledger and other chains. It crossed $1 billion in market value quickly after launch, a sign of real demand, and it has become the asset Ripple increasingly puts forward as the cash leg in its enterprise settlements.

The reason enterprises prefer a stablecoin for the money side of a transaction is straightforward and has nothing to do with any view about XRP. Businesses settling real-world value need price stability. When a company moves money across borders, it wants the amount it sends to equal the amount that arrives, with no exposure to price swings in between. XRP, like any freely traded cryptocurrency, fluctuates in price, which makes it difficult to use as the unit in which an enterprise wants to denominate and hold a settlement, even if it can still work as a bridge for moving value quickly.

A stablecoin solves this by holding a fixed dollar value, so the enterprise can settle in something that behaves like the dollars it already thinks in. This is why, across the industry and not just at Ripple, stablecoins have become the dominant on-chain settlement instrument: they combine the speed and programmability of crypto with the price stability that commerce requires. RLUSD is Ripple’s entry into that category, and its growing use in Ripple’s deals reflects the same market logic that has made stablecoins central everywhere. For readers who want the basics, how RLUSD holds its dollar peg is the starting point for understanding why enterprises gravitate toward it.

The same logic explains why exchange and liquidity integrations matter. When RLUSD is listed with XRP pairs and broader access, the stablecoin becomes easier to move, price, and route through the infrastructure Ripple wants enterprises to use. That helps Ripple’s payments stack, and it can deepen activity on the XRP Ledger, but it still does not mean every dollar of settlement creates direct XRP demand. The holder question is what remains for XRP once the stablecoin has taken the stable cash role.

Understanding this matters because it reframes the concern. RLUSD is not showing up in Ripple’s settlements simply because Ripple is trying to sideline XRP; it is showing up because enterprises asked for a stable settlement asset and Ripple built one to give them. That is a rational business decision for Ripple and a useful product decision for institutions. The harder question is whether that useful product decision narrows the value-accrual path that XRP holders were counting on.

Is RLUSD cannibalizing XRP’s role? This is the crux of the matter, and it deserves to be stated plainly: there is a real argument that RLUSD is taking the settlement role XRP was originally meant to play. The classic XRP thesis cast the token as the bridge asset for cross-border value transfer, the thing that would sit in the middle of international settlements, moving value between currencies in seconds and capturing demand as global payment volume flowed through it. Stablecoins complicate that thesis directly, because a dollar stablecoin can perform much of the cross-border settlement function that XRP was built for, moving value quickly and programmably while also offering the price stability XRP cannot. If enterprises can settle in RLUSD on the XRP Ledger, getting the speed of the ledger without the volatility of the token, then the specific demand driver that was supposed to accrue to XRP may instead accrue to the stablecoin.

This is the structural worry beneath the holder concern, and it is not easily waved away. The bull case for XRP has long depended on the idea that Ripple’s growing settlement business would translate into demand for the token, but if the settlement business increasingly runs on RLUSD, that translation weakens. Ripple’s institutional infrastructure could keep growing impressively, opening corridors and closing deals, while the value of that growth flows through stablecoins and fiat instead of driving XRP token demand. That would leave the familiar gap between corporate progress and token price not just intact but mechanically explained.

The token could end up as the rails, valuable to the system but not the asset that captures the economic value moving across it. This is the version of events that should genuinely concern holders, and it is why the RLUSD pattern is more than a cosmetic detail. It points to a possible future in which XRP’s network succeeds, Ripple thrives, RLUSD becomes a major settlement asset, and XRP the token still struggles to convert all of that activity into sustained demand because the demand has a stablecoin to flow into instead. That is also why the older question of XRP’s bridge-asset role needs to be revisited rather than repeated as if nothing has changed.

There is a broader parallel here with other infrastructure tokens. A network can be useful without its native token absorbing the full value of that usefulness, especially when users can interact with the network through stable assets, tokenized deposits, or application-level instruments. XRP holders have already seen this in miniature: the ledger gets institutional proof points, Ripple gets business wins, and XRP gets fees, reserves, or optional routing rather than obvious direct demand. Whether that is enough depends on scale, and that scale has not yet shown up in the price.

The bullish case: complementary, not competing The other side of this debate is serious and deserves a full hearing, because the framing of RLUSD versus XRP as a zero-sum contest may be too simple. The first counterargument is that RLUSD and XRP serve different functions and can coexist productively. A stablecoin is the cash leg, the stable unit in which value is denominated and held. XRP, in the bridge role, can still serve as the connective asset that moves value between different currencies and stablecoins, the neutral intermediary in a world where many different fiat-backed stablecoins exist and need to be exchanged.

In this view, a proliferation of stablecoins actually increases the need for a neutral bridge asset to move between them, and XRP could capture that role precisely because it is not tied to any single currency. RLUSD handles the dollar leg, MXNB handles the peso leg, and other stablecoins can handle other currencies or jurisdictions. XRP can then sit between those assets when liquidity is fragmented, routing value across the ledger’s exchange and payments infrastructure. That is a more modest thesis than “XRP becomes the cash leg of global settlement,” but it is not an irrelevant one.

The second counterargument concerns incentives. Ripple is the largest single holder of XRP, which means the company has a powerful, built-in economic reason to drive the token’s value and usage that does not depend on any promise. Every corridor Ripple opens, every institution it onboards, and every unit of activity it brings to the XRP Ledger can eventually matter to XRP if that activity creates fees, reserves, routing, liquidity depth, or bridge demand. From this angle, Ripple building a successful stablecoin is not a betrayal of XRP holders but an expansion of the ecosystem XRP sits inside.

Even RLUSD, issued on the XRP Ledger, can support XRP indirectly by increasing ledger activity and making the network more useful to institutions. That is the strongest version of the complementary thesis: stablecoins bring institutions onto the rail, and once they are there, XRP has more chances to serve as liquidity, routing, or bridge infrastructure. The weakness is timing and certainty. Indirect value can take years to show up, and investors do not price “maybe someday” the same way they price direct, measurable demand today.

The third point is that XRP’s strongest catalysts were never really about being the settlement cash leg in the first place. The most powerful drivers of XRP’s potential value, regulatory clarity from the CLARITY Act, compounding ETF inflows, and broad adoption of the ledger, operate largely independent of whether RLUSD or XRP is the cash leg in any given deal. On this reading, holders fixating only on the RLUSD-versus-XRP question are watching one important variable, but not the only variable. The better question is whether the total system being built around XRP Ledger becomes large enough that XRP’s indirect roles finally matter.

The value-accrual problem at the heart of it Step back and the RLUSD debate is really a specific instance of the deepest question in the entire XRP story, the one that has defined the token through 2026: how, exactly, does value accrue to XRP? A blockchain network can succeed enormously while the token native to it struggles if the activity on the network does not translate into sustained demand for the token. This is the puzzle XRP holders have lived with all year, watching Ripple rack up settlements, stablecoin launches, banking moves, and enterprise deals while the token stayed pinned near a dollar beneath every major moving average. The RLUSD pattern sharpens this puzzle by identifying a concrete reason the translation might be failing.

If the settlement value that was supposed to flow into XRP flows into RLUSD instead, then network success and token demand decouple in exactly the way the price action suggests. That is why the issue is bigger than one JPMorgan test or one Flutterwave deal. It is about whether XRP captures the economic value of the ledger it secures and powers, or whether it becomes a necessary but low-fee native asset beneath higher-value instruments. In previous coverage, this was the same basic dilemma behind the company-versus-token gap up close: Ripple can become more valuable without XRP necessarily moving in lockstep.

The honest framing is that XRP’s range-bound behavior is less a mystery than a predictable feature of how value accrues, or fails to accrue, to a token whose network can succeed without it. The waiting ends only when usage and token demand finally converge, and that convergence requires specific things to happen. Settlement volume needs to become large enough that fees, reserves, routing, and ecosystem use begin to matter against the enormous XRP supply locked in escrow. ETF flows also need to compound instead of trickle, while a regulatory catalyst like the CLARITY Act needs to cross the line to pull institutional money off the sidelines.

RLUSD’s rise is relevant because it bears on the first of those channels, the settlement-volume channel, by raising the possibility that volume accrues to the stablecoin instead of the token. But it is only one of several channels, and the others, ETF demand and regulatory clarity, could drive XRP regardless of what settles Ripple’s deals. That is why the catalyst that drives XRP regardless still matters to holders even if RLUSD keeps winning the cash-leg role. The realistic synthesis is that the RLUSD pattern is a genuine headwind to one specific version of the XRP value-accrual thesis, the bridge-asset-settlement version, while leaving the regulatory-unlock and ETF-demand versions largely intact.

What holders should take from it So should XRP holders worry about RLUSD, and if so, how much? The grounded answer is that the concern is legitimate but should be held in proportion, neither dismissed nor allowed to dominate. The legitimate part is that RLUSD genuinely does weaken the specific thesis that institutional settlement demand would flow into XRP. In deal after deal, that demand is flowing into the stablecoin instead, and holders who bought XRP primarily on the bridge-asset-settlement story should update on that evidence instead of ignoring it.

If your entire case for XRP rested on the idea that Ripple’s settlement business would mechanically drive token demand, the RLUSD pattern is a real challenge to that case and worth taking seriously. Pretending the token is the cash leg when it increasingly is not would be wishful thinking. The question is no longer whether Ripple is winning, because it clearly is. The question is whether XRP captures enough of those wins to justify the token thesis on its own terms.

The proportion part is that the bridge-asset-settlement story was never the only pillar of the XRP thesis, and arguably not even the strongest one. The catalysts most capable of moving XRP, statutory clarity from the CLARITY Act and the institutional ETF demand it could unlock, operate largely independent of whether RLUSD or XRP settles any given transaction. Ripple’s status as the largest XRP holder also keeps its incentives aligned with the token even as it builds RLUSD. The stablecoin may be the product enterprises want now, but XRP remains the native asset inside the ecosystem those enterprises are entering.

The most useful posture for a holder is therefore to treat the RLUSD pattern as important information about where one channel of demand is going, while keeping attention on the channels that matter more: regulatory progress, ETF flows, and whether ledger activity overall, RLUSD included, grows large enough to support the token through fees, reserves, routing, and ecosystem demand. For price-focused readers, what the gap means for price is the practical version of the same question. If XRP keeps failing to convert Ripple’s wins into token demand, the chart will continue to reflect that. If regulatory clarity, ETF inflows, and ledger usage finally converge, RLUSD may look less like a replacement and more like the stablecoin that helped bring institutions onto the rail.

The deepest truth here is that XRP’s fate depends on the convergence of usage and token demand, and RLUSD is one factor among several bearing on that convergence. It is a headwind to one pillar instead of the collapse of the whole case. Holders should worry enough to watch it closely and to be honest about which version of the XRP thesis it undercuts, but not so much that they lose sight of the larger catalysts that will ultimately determine whether the token finally breaks its range.

Frequently asked questions What is RLUSD? RLUSD is Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, a token designed to hold a steady value of $1, backed by reserves, and issued on the XRP Ledger and other blockchains. It crossed $1 billion in market value quickly after launch, reflecting real demand, and Ripple increasingly puts it forward as the cash leg, the stable settlement asset, in its enterprise deals. Because it holds a fixed dollar value instead of fluctuating like XRP, RLUSD is suited to the role of denominating and settling real-world value, which is why it has become central to Ripple’s institutional settlement business and to the debate about what that leaves for XRP.

Why do Ripple’s deals use RLUSD instead of XRP? Because enterprises settling real-world value need price stability, and a stablecoin provides it while XRP does not. When a business moves money across borders, it wants the amount it sends to equal the amount that arrives, with no exposure to price swings in between. XRP fluctuates in price, which makes it useful as a fast bridge for moving value but difficult as the unit an enterprise wants to hold and settle in. RLUSD holds a fixed dollar value, so enterprises can settle in something that behaves like the dollars they already use.

Is RLUSD replacing XRP? Not exactly, though it is taking part of the role XRP was originally pitched for. The classic XRP thesis cast the token as the bridge asset for cross-border settlement, and a dollar stablecoin can perform much of that settlement function while also offering price stability XRP lacks, so RLUSD does compete with one version of XRP’s intended purpose. The counterargument is that the two are complementary: RLUSD handles the dollar cash leg, while XRP can serve as the neutral bridge that moves value between many different currencies and stablecoins. A world of many stablecoins may actually increase the need for a neutral bridge asset, a role XRP could fill.

Does RLUSD’s success hurt XRP holders? It weakens one specific pillar of the XRP bull case, the idea that Ripple’s settlement business would mechanically drive XRP token demand, because that settlement demand increasingly flows into RLUSD instead. Holders who bought XRP primarily on that bridge-asset-settlement story should take the pattern seriously. However, RLUSD runs on the XRP Ledger, generating activity, fees, reserves, and ecosystem growth that can indirectly support XRP, and Ripple, as the largest XRP holder, keeps its incentives aligned with the token. The stronger XRP catalysts, regulatory clarity and ETF demand, operate largely independent of which asset settles a given deal, so RLUSD is a headwind to one pillar instead of the collapse of the whole case.

What actually drives XRP’s value then? XRP’s value depends on the convergence of network usage and token demand, which requires specific things to happen. Settlement and ecosystem activity must become large enough that fees, reserves, routing, and demand begin to matter against the large XRP supply locked in escrow. Spot ETF inflows also need to compound, and a regulatory catalyst like the CLARITY Act needs to cross the line to pull institutional money off the sidelines. These channels, particularly the regulatory unlock and ETF demand, operate largely regardless of whether RLUSD or XRP settles any individual transaction.

Should I sell XRP because of RLUSD? This article does not give investment advice, and that decision depends on your own analysis and circumstances. What the analysis offers is a framework: RLUSD truly weakens the bridge-asset-settlement version of the XRP thesis, so if that was your primary reason for holding, the pattern is a real challenge worth weighing honestly. But it leaves the regulatory-clarity and ETF-demand versions of the thesis largely intact, and Ripple’s incentives remain aligned with XRP as its largest holder. The proportionate response is to watch the RLUSD trend closely and be honest about which pillar it undercuts, while keeping the larger catalysts in view instead of reacting to a single factor in isolation.

This article is information, not investment advice. Partnership details, settlement mechanics, market values, and corporate plans reflect reporting available as of June 28, 2026, and can change quickly. The relationship between RLUSD and XRP is an evolving and debated topic. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell XRP, RLUSD, or any asset. Verify current details from primary sources and consider your own circumstances before making any decision.

XRP ETF Inflows Continued in JuneData shows that spot XRP ETFs added $46.5 million in assets this month, bringing the cumulative net inflow to $1.43 billion. These funds have had only one month of outflows since their launch in November last year.

Bitwise’s XRP ETF holds $293 million in assets, while the ETFs from Franklin, Canary, and 21Shares manage $235 million, $234 million, and $112 million, respectively.

The ongoing XRP ETF inflows are a sharp contrast to those tracking Bitcoin and Ethereum. Spot Bitcoin ETFs had over $4.06 billion in outflows this month, bringing the net outflows since January to $5.6 billion.

Similarly, Ethereum ETFs have shed over $471 million in outflows this month, lower than the $540 million they lost last month.

XRP ETF inflows rose in the same week in which Ripple announced that RLUSD, its stablecoin, will now be available in Japan following the approval by the main financial regulator. This approval will likely help it become an alternative to USDC and USDT. 

Recent data, however, shows that RLUSD has lost momentum as the supply has dropped to $1.57 billion from the year-to-date high of $1.8 billion. RLUSD has become one of the most important use cases for the XRP Ledger network. 

Another major news came from Europe, where Ripple secured a preliminary Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license in Luxembourg. This is a major milestone as it paves the way for the full rollout of Ripple Payments across the Euro area and MiCA compliance.

XRP Price is Hanging on a Thread Above $1The weekly chart shows that the Ripple price has slumped in the past few months, mirroring the performance of most cryptocurrencies. It dropped from a high of $3.6690 in July to the current $1.06. 

The token has slumped below the Major S&R pivot point of the Murrey Math Lines tool. It has remained below the 50-week and 100-week Exponential Moving Averages (EMA). 

XRP has settled along the 78.6% Fibonacci Retracement level. Therefore, there is a risk that the token may drop further in the near term, potentially to the Strong, Pivot, Reverse level of the Murrey Math Lines at $0.7813. This view will be confirmed if it drops below the supply of $1.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

Ripple’s [XRP] decline continued after leveraged buyers lost control, pushing the altcoin down to $1.02, its lowest value since early February. Initially, the price slipped toward $1.07 before triggering nearly $9 million in long liquidations on the 25th of June.

Binance led with about $4.5 million, highlighting the concentration of the leverage that existed within one exchange. As forced selling intensified, derivatives traders rapidly reduced exposure instead of adding fresh positions.

Binance Open Interest dropped to nearly $205 million, marking its lowest level since the 22nd of March. Meanwhile, Bybit Open Interest fell to around $185 million, reinforcing the domino effect of the catastrophe.

Source: CryptoQuant This synchronized decline suggests speculative excess has largely been flushed from the market. Such resets typically take some pressure off the downside because they eliminate the weakly positioned leveraged sellers.

Otherwise, lower leverage alone may stabilize volatility without generating a sustained recovery. The next directional move will likely depend on whether fresh buyers replace liquidated positions or continue waiting on the sidelines.

ETF demand tightens XRP supply XRP ETF demand is tightening available XRP supply despite the market weakness. The net inflow reached 4.82 million XRP during week 26, driving total ETF holdings up by almost 10% to 938.73 million XRP, which accounts for approximately 1% of the currently circulating XRP.

With each new ETF creation requiring the purchase of additional Spot XRP, this gradual reduction in available XRP on the open market can help limit the amount of sellable inventory or reduce potential selling pressure.

Source: XRP Insights On the other hand, despite the fact that institutional buyers are accumulating significant amounts of XRP via the ETFs, no corresponding increase in participation from the broader spot market has been seen.

As such, prices have continued to be pressured downward. In addition to the decrease in price, valuations have also declined from over $1 billion at one time down to $989 million at present.

As such, it appears that institutional buying power has increased more than the valuation of XRP.

If ETF inflows persist alongside stronger spot demand, shrinking liquid supply could increasingly amplify future price recoveries. Otherwise, accumulation may continue without triggering an immediate breakout.

Final Summary Ripple’s leverage reset has reduced speculative pressure, but sustained recovery still depends on fresh spot demand returning. XRP ETF accumulation continues tightening liquid supply, though stronger Spot participation remains essential for a lasting breakout.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have jointly called for public comment on their approach to harmonizing regulatory frameworks for crypto futures. The proposed public comment on the SEC CFTC framework comes amid the recent approval of crypto perpetual futures in the U.S.

Calls For Public Comment On SEC CFTC Framework In a press release, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint request for public comment on potential approaches to further harmonize regulatory frameworks applicable to portfolio margining across securities, security-based swaps, futures, swaps, and related positions. The public comment period will remain open for 60 days after the publication in the Federal Register. This is significant as the CFTC notably regulates prediction markets, which trade swaps.

Furthermore, this follows the launch of crypto perpetual futures in the U.S., with Kalshi securing CFTC approval to offer BTC, ETH, XRP, and HYPE futures. The request for public comment on the SEC CFTC framework also comes amid the rise in tokenized securities, with platforms such as Hyperliquid offering perpetuals for these securities.

The SEC and CFTC noted that the request for comment will assist them in evaluating whether greater coordination or alignment in portfolio margining requirements may improve risk management efficiency, reduce unnecessary market fragmentation, and enhance consumer protections.

Meanwhile, this marks the latest coordination between the SEC and CFTC towards providing clear frameworks that boost the crypto and financial markets. As CoinGape reported, the SEC and CFTC are pushing to clarify the definitions of derivative products, including definitions of swaps and security-based swaps, and how to treat them.

A Move To Further Promote Innovation SEC Chair Paul Atkins noted that further harmonizing the SEC CFTC framework will ensure that jurisdictional overlap does not stifle innovation and efficiency. “Cross-margining offers a clear opportunity to unlock liquidity that remains frozen in separate accounts, and we encourage market participants to provide feedback on ideas that will help improve coordination between both agencies,” he said.

Commenting on this move, CFTC Chair Michael Selig said that fostering enhanced cooperation between the two agencies on portfolio margining promises to unlock untapped capital while ensuring a more robust risk management framework and market protections. The CFTC is currently facing a lawsuit from the CME over its approval of crypto futures.

The CME argues that crypto perpetuals are swaps, not futures contracts, and that the regulator approved these products the wrong way. These crypto futures are already seeing significant demand, with Kalshi’s products recording over $1 billion in trading volume in under two weeks after they launched.

Elon Musk’s X Money begins rolling out to some of Premium+ users today, with “everything app” payments feature gaining momentum. X Money is using Ripple’s long-term partner Cross River Bank as banking infrastructure for its services, sparking speculation over XRP and other crypto integration in the future.

Elon Musk Launches Digital Payments Service X Money X Money, the payments and digital wallet system integrated into Elon Musk’s X platform, is rolling out to select users with features like peer-to-peer transfers, a Visa debit card, and high-yield savings options.

pic.twitter.com/6Zi3pmHwPN

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 25, 2026

While currently fiat-focused and backed by traditional rails, its banking infrastructure provider Cross River Bank is a long-standing partner with Ripple since 2014.

FDIC member Cross River Bank serves as the primary banking partner for X Money, holding user deposits and offering up to $10M in FDIC insurance through the X Cash Sweep Program. It would power key elements like card issuance and payment processing.

This brings XRP into the spotlight, sparking speculation about future cross-border efficiency, stablecoin support, or even direct token integration. Cross River uses XRP Ledger to enable faster and lower-cost cross-border transfers.

The XRP Army claimed a likely infrastructure overlap for deposits and instant settlement. Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s X Money launch coincided with Ripple’s push to provide tradFi with payments and tokenization infrastructure. XRP’s strengths in liquidity and speed could prove valuable.

While X Money remains primarily a fiat-based service in its early public access phase, Elon Musk earlier hinted about potential crypto integration.

As CoinGape reported earlier, Elon Musk’s X launched Big Charts for stocks and crypto, expanding its Smart Cashtags feature. Users can see larger real-time charts and posts for BTC, ETH, XRP, HYPE, DOGE, TSLA, MSTR, COIN, and others.

Will XRP Price Rebound? XRP price pared gains after rebounding more than 3% after the crypto market crash. The price is currently trading at $1.03, with a 24-hour low and high of $1.01 and $1.08, respectively. Furthermore, trading volume has increased by 25% in the last 24 hours, indicating a rise in interest among traders.

Analyst Ali Martinez pointed out that XRP is testing a major volume block at $1.06. On-chain data from the UTXO Realized Price Distribution (URPD) showed over 830 million XRP changed hands at the price.

It makes it a key support level to watch. If XRP plunges, the next support levels based on volume are $0.80, $0.62, and $0.51.

CoinGlass data showed selling in the derivatives market amid crypto options expiry. The total XRP futures open interest dropped 1.83% to $2.31 billion in the last 4 hours.

XRP UTXO Realized Price Distribution. Source: Ali Martinez

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is poised to welcome a new generation of lending and yield products as its decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem continues its rapid expansion. 

Ripple executive J. Ayo Akinyele has provided a detailed clarification regarding the upcoming Lending Protocol v1.1. 

Akinyele explicitly stated that v1.1 is an enhancement to the existing protocol, rather than a replacement for v1.0, and emphasized that developers have no reason to hold off on utilizing v1.0 today.

HOT Stories

"The protocol works as designed," Akinyele noted, explaining that the v1.1 update simply introduces refinements and added flexibility driven by feedback from the ecosystem and the long-term vision for lending on the XRPL.

Version 1.1 will ship as a separate amendment that extends the existing protocol. The previous will not be deprecated, meaning supporting it now allows institutions and developers to deploy lending applications and use cases directly on the mainnet.

"The protocol works as designed. v1.1 enhances it: refinements and added flexibility driven by ecosystem feedback and where we want lending on XRPL to go. It ships as a separate amendment that extends the existing protocol. v1.0 will not be deprecated, and supporting it now will enable institutions and developers to deploy lending applications and use cases on mainnet," he said. 

The activation of v1.1 will follow the standard amendment process, meaning there is no dependency requiring users to wait for it before acting on v1.0. Each amendment will be reviewed on its own merits by validators on their normal cadence.

SOIL eyes first application After the news of the protocol's development, another Ripple executive confirmed that a new wave of lending and yield products is officially coming to the network.

SOIL, a prominent protocol known for offering institutional lending services using USDC, RLUSD, and XRP, has officially announced its plans to integrate the XRPL Lending Protocol alongside SAV. The firm is positioning itself to become the first application to leverage these native features, which could potentially introduce an entirely new category of yield-generation products directly to the XRP Ledger.

To facilitate this new phase of lending services, the firm has proposed the activation of specific technical standards in the near future. Most notably, this includes the XLS-65 and XLS-66 standards, which are expected to be activated as soon as possible to ensure the lending upgrade is effectively deployed across the network.

TLDR: Binance’s XRP Perpetual-Spot Volume Imbalance Z-Score sits near neutral at 0.17, within normal historical range. XRP dropped over 3.3% in 24 hours to $1.049 as tech stock declines triggered over $1 billion in crypto liquidations. Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin launched on SBI VC Trade in Japan, becoming the first regulated listing with zero fees. Spot XRP ETFs recorded $31.32 million in June net inflows, well below May’s record high of $132 million. Binance’s XRP Perpetual-Spot Volume Imbalance Z-Score is holding near neutral at approximately 0.17, according to the latest on-chain data.

The reading reflects that the gap between perpetual and spot trading volumes remains within a historically normal range.

XRP is trading near $1.02 as of this writing, down over 4.4% in 24 hours amid a broad crypto market selloff. Despite the price drop, derivatives market activity has not shown signs of excessive speculative buildup.

Z-Score Stability Points to Measured Derivatives Positioning The Volume Imbalance indicator on Binance measures the difference between perpetual and spot trading volumes for XRP.

The current reading stands at approximately 0.51, with the 30-day Z-Score sitting near 0.17. That figure places the current imbalance well within the range of normal activity relative to the past month.

Source: CryptoQuant

Perpetual trading continues to dominate XRP market activity, but the margin of dominance remains unremarkable.

The Z-Score has moved through notable swings over the past several months. During price rallies in April and May, perpetual volumes expanded sharply, widening the gap above spot market activity on several occasions.

As XRP’s price retreated and speculative interest eased, the indicator pulled back toward balanced levels. The 30-day Z-Score then stabilized near zero before settling at its current modest positive reading.

A Z-Score of 0.17 indicates the present level of perpetual dominance is not exceptional. It falls broadly in line with average derivatives activity recorded over the past month.

There is no evidence of the kind of leverage buildup that typically precedes sharp price swings or large-scale liquidation events. At the same time, the reading does not suggest any notable drop in trader participation across derivatives markets.

The data paints a picture of cautious, measured positioning in XRP derivatives at this stage. Traders appear to be adjusting exposure gradually rather than piling into directional bets.

That behavior is consistent with a market navigating a broad selloff without taking on outsized risk. The Z-Score’s proximity to neutral reflects that restraint across Binance’s XRP derivatives market.

Market Context: Selloff and Ecosystem Developments XRP’s decline of over 4.4% in 24 hours came alongside a broader crypto market selloff driven by falling technology stocks.

Over $1 billion in crypto positions were liquidated during the period across the market. The price pressure pushed XRP to approximately $1.02, compounding recent weakness in the token.

Despite the turbulence, Binance’s derivatives data has not shown a corresponding spike in speculative activity.

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin launched in Japan through SBI VC Trade, the first Japanese exchange to list the asset. The listing is fully regulated and carries zero fees, going live immediately upon approval.

X Finance Bull noted on X that the Japan listing continues opening regulatory doors for the broader Ripple ecosystem.

JUST IN 🚨 RLUSD on Japan now.

Is $XRP for settlement next?

SBI VC Trade became the first Japanese exchange to list Ripple's stablecoin, fully regulated, zero fees, live today.

Japan keeps opening doors for the Ripple ecosystem one piece at a time.pic.twitter.com/IT9nYBpz1g https://t.co/SfemaHq3N2

— X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) June 24, 2026

RLUSD also surpassed Ethereum in circulating supply, adding to the milestone’s weight despite subdued XRP price action.

Spot XRP ETFs recorded $31.32 million in net inflows during June, per SoSoValue data. That figure trails May’s record of $132 million in net inflows by a wide margin.

Still, the ongoing institutional interest reflected in ETF flows contrasts with the short-term price weakness. Cumulative inflows into spot XRP ETF products have exceeded $1.43 billion since their November 2025 launch.

The combination of a neutral Z-Score, modest ETF inflows, and active ecosystem expansion gives a layered picture of XRP’s current market state.

Price performance has weakened amid macro-driven selling pressure. However, derivatives positioning on Binance remains measured, and the broader Ripple infrastructure continues to grow.

The Z-Score’s stability near 0.17 suggests traders are not amplifying the selloff through excessive leveraged exposure.

Members of the XRP community are warning users to be cautious of scam tokens claiming to represent JPYSC on the XRP Ledger.

This comes as Japan’s financial giant, SBI Holdings, officially launched JPYSC, a trust-bank-backed yen stablecoin. The development sparked speculation about whether JPYSC could be issued on XRPL.

Warning Over Fake JPYSC Tokens XRPL validator Vet (Hussein Zangana) cautioned users that JPYSC has not been publicly announced for issuance on the XRP Ledger. So, any token currently using the JPYSC ticker on XRPL should be treated as suspicious.

The warning comes as scammers may try to exploit excitement surrounding the stablecoin. SBI’s long-standing relationship with Ripple and the XRP ecosystem has fueled expectations that JPYSC could interact with XRPL.

Another XRP community member said they have established monitoring systems to track new trustlines from known SBI addresses. The goal is to identify any legitimate issuance activity if it occurs in the future.

JPYSC Launches Within SBI VC Trade Notably, JPYSC went live on June 24 as a trust-type yen stablecoin issued by SBI Shinsei Trust Bank and distributed through SBI VC Trade. The stablecoin was developed jointly with Startale Group and is currently available only to SBI VC Trade account holders.

Unlike many stablecoins operating under Japan’s money transfer regulations, JPYSC is structured as a trust-bank-backed electronic payment instrument. SBI says this framework removes the ¥1 million transaction cap that applies to certain payment products. 

For now, JPYSC remains confined to SBI VC Trade accounts. Users cannot withdraw it to external wallets or public blockchains.

SBI Preparing for Public Blockchain Expansion Although transfers are currently restricted, SBI said the technical and operational groundwork for public blockchain circulation has already been completed.

The company stated that once regulatory requirements and tax frameworks are finalized and approved, it plans to enable domestic and international circulation of JPYSC on public blockchain networks.

SBI did not specify which blockchain networks will support JPYSC after the public rollout. As a result, XRP Ledger supporters continue to speculate about a possible future integration.

Because no network has been officially confirmed, community members are urging users to verify issuer addresses before interacting with any token claiming to represent JPYSC.

SBI Targets On-Chain Finance and Tokenization SBI described JPYSC as part of an effort to connect traditional finance with blockchain-based markets. The company outlined several planned use cases once public-chain deployment begins, including:

On-chain foreign exchange markets involving yen and dollar stablecoins Institutional lending and borrowing Settlement of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) Retail and merchant payments Cross-border remittances OTC and institutional crypto trading SBI Chairman and CEO Yoshitaka Kitao said the migration of financial services onto blockchain networks is “irreversible”. He described JPYSC as an important step toward building Japan’s on-chain financial infrastructure.

Meanwhile, Sota Watanabe said preparations for external wallet transfers and public-chain circulation are already complete. According to Watanabe, the remaining obstacles are primarily regulatory and tax-related.

For XRP investors, the launch has attracted attention because of SBI’s close ties to Ripple. However, no official announcement has linked JPYSC to the XRP Ledger so far. 

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

XRP is trading just above $1, leaving the token at its weakest price level of the year, but onchain data paints a different picture. 

The exchange-held XRP supply continues to fall, Binance withdrawals have exceeded deposits for seven straight days, whale flows are holding positive and spot XRP exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have attracted $243 million in inflows since April.

The improving onchain data points to healthy network positioning, even as XRP continues to search for a price bottom.  

XRP supply on exchanges continues to shrinkCrypto analyst Amr Taha noted that Binance's XRP reserve has fallen to its lowest level since March after roughly 100 million XRP left the exchange over the past month. Binance's balance stood at about 2.68 billion XRP on June 25, down from 2.78 billion XRP on May 12, accounting for the largest outflow among major trading platforms.

XRP multi-exchange daily reserve. Source: CryptoQuant

Other exchanges also posted smaller declines. Upbit's reserve fell to 2.48 billion XRP on June 25 from 2.51 billion XRP on May 31, while Bybit's holdings declined to 82 million XRP from 92 million XRP on June 2. Binance led in absolute outflows, while Bybit recorded the steepest percentage decline.

Taha also highlighted a significant shift in Binance transaction activity. XRP withdrawal transactions have exceeded deposits for seven consecutive days since June 17. The seven-day withdrawal share climbed to 53.8% on June 23, its highest reading since June 2024, while deposits fell to 46.1%, the weakest level since 2024.

XRP daily deposit/withdrawal transactions (%) on Binance. Source: CryptoQuant

The metric tracks transaction count rather than XRP volume. This indicates users are moving coins off Binance more frequently than sending them to the exchange, marking the longest withdrawal-led stretch in roughly a year.

Large XRP holders supported the trend. XRP whale flow on the 90-day moving average has stayed positive throughout the quarter at 5.143 million XRP per day, showing consistent net accumulation by large wallets instead of distribution. 

XRP whale flows. Source: CryptoQuant

Institutional demand has also added support. Spot XRP ETFs recorded $2 million in net inflows on June 24, lifting June's total netflows to $31 million. Since April, the total cumulative inflows have reached $243 million.

XRP price approaches a major demand zoneFrom a technical standpoint, the higher-time-frame market structure remains bearish for the altcoin. XRP touched $1.01 on Thursday, its lowest price of 2026, leaving the token close to its first move below $1 since November 2024. The decline has pushed XRP down 43% year-to-date.

XRP/USDT, one-week chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The next key area for XRP sits within the fair value gap between $1 and $0.63, an unfilled price gap created during the sharp rally in late 2024 that could attract buying interest if the decline extends in the coming weeks. 

Black Swan Capitalist founder Versan Aljarrah continues to focus on the longer-term chart. The analyst said XRP has spent years building a large accumulation range with higher lows on both weekly and monthly timeframes.

XRP/USD, one-month chart analysis by Versan Aljarrah. Source: X

Aljarrah argued that extended consolidations often produce stronger breakout moves once the price eventually breaks out of the range, with the analyst targeting $10, i.e., a 900% increase from the current price. 

This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph's Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research.

Ripple has appeared on the doorsteps of American lawmakers as part of its effort to push the passage of the Clarity Act.  

San Francisco-headquartered company, which is known for its association with the XRP cryptocurrency, has launched a mobile campaign in the capital with a branded "Clarity truck" to lobby Congress (as shown in the X post below). 

On the road to clarity - literally!
Ripple's Clarity truck is out in D.C. as Congress works on the Clarity Act, which creates clear rules for digital assets and crypto.
Clear rules help protect consumers, support responsible innovation, and keep the U.S. competitive pic.twitter.com/FGdTHVguPl

— Lauren Belive (@BeliveLauren) June 25, 2026  The timing is crucial, given that legislators keep mulling over the major regulatory framework for cryptocurrency. 

Lauren Belive, the head of the U.S. Public Policy at Ripple, has quipped that the company is "on the road to clarity—literally!" The exec has stressed that clear crypto rules will be beneficial for consumers and American competitiveness. 

HOT Stories

The massive Senate hurdle  The passage of the Clarity Act, which aspires to resolve years of regulatory uncertainty, appears to be less likely with each passing day. As of today, Polymarket bettors see only a 43% chance of the bill being signed into law this year. 

The Clarity Act cleared the House with strong bipartisan support back in July, but it has struggled to pass the upper chamber. 

You Might Also Like

Negotiations stalled over unresolved ethics and conflict-of-interest provisions. Senate Democrats were reportedly left frustrated by the lack of cooperation. 

Moreover, there are disagreements over DeFi platforms as well as stablecoin yield and rewards (the most contentious issue). 

So far, no Senate floor vote has been scheduled. The Republicans have to secure at least seven Democratic votes to overcome a filibuster.   

The Senate is scheduled to head to its July 4 recess on June 27. 

Analysts view early to mid-August as the practical deadline for the bill to pass the Senate.

Ripple previously supported the imperfect legislative effort despite some opposition from the broader industry, stating that clarity is better than chaos. 

Ripple has officially launched its USD-backed stablecoin RLUSD in Japan, marking a major milestone in the company’s expansion across Asia. Following approval from Japan’s Financial Services Agency (JFSA), RLUSD is now available to both institutional and retail users through SBI VC Trade’s VCTRADE platform. 

The launch delivers on the strategic partnership announced by Ripple and SBI Group in August 2025 and brings regulated USD stablecoin access to one of the world’s most advanced digital asset markets.

Ripple and SBI Expand Their Long-Term PartnershipRipple and SBI have been working together since 2016 to expand blockchain use across Japan and Asia-Pacific. With RLUSD now live, they plan to use it for cross-border payments, tokenization, and collateral management. 

Ripple says Japan’s clear regulations make it a key market for stablecoins, while SBI called the launch a major step toward the future of on-chain finance. 

Konnichiwa 🇯🇵 @Ripple and @sbigroup have officially launched Ripple USD (RLUSD) in Japan!

Following JFSA approval, RLUSD is now live for institutional and retail users on SBI VC Trade’s platform. This builds directly on our long-standing partnership and brings trusted,… https://t.co/Fe20yKQEMJ

— Reece Merrick (@reece_merrick) June 25, 2026 According to Reece Merrick, Managing Director, Middle East & Africa, Ripple, “following JFSA approval, RLUSD is now live for institutional and retail users on SBI VC Trade’s platform. This builds directly on our long-standing partnership and brings trusted, regulated USD stablecoin access to one of the most innovative markets.”

A Fully Regulated USD StablecoinRLUSD has been approved in Japan as a Type 4 Electronic Payment Instrument.It is fully backed 1:1 by U.S. dollar deposits, Treasuries, and cash equivalents.Reserves are verified through monthly third-party attestations.SBI VC Trade will offer free RLUSD deposits and withdrawals.RLUSD is the second USD stablecoin on the platform after USD Coin.Since launching in late 2024, RLUSD has grown to a market cap of about $1.7 billion.RLUSD on XRPL Is Closing In on EthereumMeanwhile, the community is getting more interested in RLUSD’s supply distribution across blockchains.

According to XRP community members Vet and Bill Morgan, RLUSD circulating on the XRP Ledger is now close to overtaking Ethereum, with roughly $792 million on XRPL compared with about $793 million on Ethereum.

Analysts see Ripple is gradually shifting growth toward XRPL, which better aligns with the stablecoin’s core strengths of fast payments and efficient value transfers. Recent customer redemptions on Ethereum have also reduced supply there.

With Japan now onboard, Ripple is continuing to position RLUSD as a key piece of regulated global financial infrastructure.

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

2026.06.14 10:47:19

On June 14, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings show the regulator has formally approved a rule change proposed by NYSE Arca that enables the listing and trading of the T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF. An actively managed cryptocurrency ETF, the fund will invest in a basket of digital assets meeting SEC-defined "eligible asset" criteria. While it uses a cryptocurrency index as its benchmark, it will not track that index passively. The filing notes the fund is projected to hold roughly 5 to 15 distinct cryptocurrencies, including major tokens like Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Avalanche (AVAX), Litecoin (LTC), Polkadot (DOT), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Chainlink (LINK). The SEC filing also reveals the fund may hold stablecoins—primarily USDC—as "tokenized cash" during normal operations to cover expenses and rebalance assets, though these will not count toward its core investment portfolio. The approval notice stresses the product must adhere to NYSE Arca’s rules around anti-manipulation, disclosure, liquidity, and risk management. It also requires the fund to have information barriers (often called "firewalls") and position transparency mechanisms in place to uphold market fairness and prevent insider trading. Analysts say this ETF’s approval further expands cryptocurrency’s footprint within the traditional financial sector, marking the arrival of actively managed multi-crypto ETFs as tradable products under mainstream regulatory oversight.

Relevant content

The US stock market's optical communication sector rises across the board in pre-market trading, with Corning up 9.28%.

According to Bitget market data, the U.S. stock market's optical communication sector saw broad pre-market gains, with MRVL rising 4.99%, LITE up 3.24%, Nokia up 3.11%, Corning up 9.28%, and AXTI up 6.69%.

3 minutes ago

US-listed AI chip stocks saw mixed pre-market performance, with Qualcomm surging 13%.

According to Bitget market data, U.S. AI chip stocks posted mixed pre-market performance: Qualcomm (QCOM.O) surged 13%, Intel (INTC.O) rose nearly 6%, AMD (AMD.O) gained nearly 4%, and Google (GOOG.O) declined 1.4%.

3 minutes ago

Micron Technology surges 18% in pre-market trading on US stocks

According to Bitget market data, the US stock storage sector is seeing broad pre-market gains. Micron Technology (MU.O) jumps 18% in pre-market trading, as its strong earnings significantly exceeded expectations, with multiple major banks raising the stock’s target price. SanDisk (SNDK) rises 12.25%, Western Digital (WDC) gains 12.05%, and Seagate Technology (STX) climbs 8.63%.

3 minutes ago

SBI announced it will acquire cryptocurrency trading platform Bitbank for 46.7 billion yen.

According to Nikkei News, Japanese financial group SBI Holdings announced on the 25th that it will acquire cryptocurrency exchange platform bitbank for 46.7 billion yen (approximately $288 million). Upon completion of the transaction, SBI Group’s crypto asset custody scale is expected to exceed 1 trillion yen, making it one of the largest operators in Japan’s crypto industry. Per the plan, a subsidiary under SBI Holdings will acquire Bitbank shares from individual shareholders including its founders as early as August this year. Bitbank will then repurchase shares held by existing shareholders MIXI and Ceres by the end of October. If combining data from SBI’s own crypto exchange SBI VC Trade and Bitbank, as of April this year, the two firms had a total of around 2.92 million accounts and total custody assets of approximately 1.1 trillion yen. While different crypto exchanges disclose custody assets at varying time points, among Japan’s major industry competitors, bitFlyer held about 960 billion yen in custody assets as of the end of December 2025, and Coincheck had around 800 billion yen as of the end of March 2025.

3 minutes ago

US Secretary of State: Will not accept the claim that the Strait of Hormuz belongs to any country.

US Secretary of State Rubio stated, "We will not accept the assertion that the Strait of Hormuz belongs to any country." (Jinshi)

3 minutes ago

Iraqi government spokesperson: Efforts are underway to restore full oil export capacity.

A spokesperson for the Iraqi government stated that Iraq is working to restore its full oil export capacity and plans to increase its oil production to 7 million barrels per day in the coming years. (Jinshi)

3 minutes ago

Hot feeds

Hot Articles

Follow us

XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) became the best-performing large-cap cryptocurrency Monday following the launch of Ripple Labs' USD-backed stablecoin RLUSD.

What happened: The payments-focused cryptocurrency rose 3.51% in the last 24 hours, outpacing the returns of Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH).

With the latest push, XRP's monthly gains zoomed to 138%, the biggest among cryptocurrencies in the top 10 by market capitalization.

The rally was likely powered by significant buying interest from whale investors. Noted cryptocurrency analyst Ali Martinez highlighted that whales purchased over 830 million XRP, worth over $2 billion at prevailing market prices.

See Also: If You Invested $1,000 In Bitcoin When The First Bitcoin ETF Was Filed, Here’s How Much You’d Have Today

The readings of moving averages supported the coin’s bullish potential. XRP's price was greater than nearly all of its exponential moving averages and simple moving averages, indicating that investors’ current expectations are higher than their average expectations over the past period.

However, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator, which compares two exponential moving averages, flashed a ‘Sell' signal. 

The Bull Bear Power indicator, used for measuring the strength of buyers and sellers in the market, was ‘Neutral" as of this writing.

Moreover. XRP's Open Interest, a measure of its speculative interest, rose 5.26% in the last 24 hours and nearly 450% since Nov. 5, the presidential election day, data from Coinglass revealed.

About 75% of all Binance traders with an open interest were positioned long on the asset, signaling the expectation of further upsides.

Why It Matters: Optimism around XRP was tied to several factors, with the most notable being the launch of RLUSD from Ripple, a payments company that uses XRP for its operations.

Ripple President Monica Long said Monday that the release marked a new chapter for the XRP Ledger, the blockchain technology powering Ripple's operations.

Ripple planned to position RLUSD for a range of financial applications, including instant cross-border settlements, Treasury operations, and integration with decentralized finance protocols.

Furthermore, with SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s tenure coming to an end and being succeeded by cryptocurrency-friendly Paul Atkins, investors feel more confident about XRP.

Ripple has been locked in a nearly four-year-long legal battle with the SEC over the status of XRP, and any change in the agency’s top leadership is viewed with optimism.

Price Action:  At the time of writing, XRP was exchanging hands at $2.49, up 3.65% in the last 24 hours, according to data from Benzinga Pro.

Read Next: 

‘Most Crypto-Foward’ RIA Slams Bitcoin Forecasts From Michael Saylor, Others: ‘Disvalues It To Me’ Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

Key Facts Flare is raising the deposit cap on the Monarq XRP Yield Vault (MXRPY) from 500,000 FXRP to 7.5 million FXRP, a 15x increase. The cap raise follows strong early demand since MXRPY’s launch on 15 May 2026 by Monarq Asset Management, Flare and Upshift. MXRPY is a managed multi-strategy vault deploying FXRP across options trading, basis and funding rate arbitrage, and on-chain XRPFi strategies, targeting 3–4% APY. Monarq, the vault’s strategy manager, is a FalconX-majority-owned digital asset manager; the vault runs on Upshift’s institutional vault infrastructure. The cap raise lands days after Flare’s 19 May integration with D’CENT Wallet, which lets XRP holders deposit into MXRPY directly from their hardware wallet using two XRPL signatures via Flare Smart Accounts. Flare is raising the deposit cap on the Monarq XRP Yield Vault (MXRPY) from 500,000 FXRP to 7.5 million FXRP — a 15x increase that reflects unusually strong early demand from XRP holders since the vault launched on 15 May 2026. The expansion comes alongside Flare’s new integration with D’CENT Wallet, which has put the vault within two signatures of hundreds of thousands of hardware wallet users globally.

Why the cap is being raised MXRPY launched with a deliberately conservative initial cap of 500,000 FXRP, giving Monarq Asset Management and infrastructure provider Upshift time to assess flow and validate the vault’s three-strategy execution model in live conditions. The 15x cap raise to 7.5 million FXRP signals that initial demand has comfortably exceeded the launch allocation and that the operating partners are confident the underlying strategy can scale meaningfully.

The expansion also responds to the distribution shift now underway. With XRP holders gaining wallet-native access through D’CENT’s hardware wallet — and additional distribution channels likely to follow through the XRP Alliance — the practical addressable demand for the vault has stepped up sharply over the past two weeks. A 500,000 FXRP cap was never going to be enough to absorb that broader flow.

How MXRPY works MXRPY is a managed multi-strategy yield vault built by Monarq Asset Management on Upshift’s institutional vault infrastructure. It is the first XRP-denominated vault on Flare to combine on-chain DeFi with off-chain execution under a single managed product. Users deposit FXRP — Flare’s trust-minimised representation of XRP — and receive MXRPY receipt tokens representing principal and accrued yield.

Capital is allocated across three return engines: options trading, basis and funding rate arbitrage, and on-chain XRPFi positioning. The target annual yield sits at approximately 3% to 4% APY, with returns distributed over time depending on strategy performance and market conditions. Withdrawals settle on a weekly cycle every Friday, with an option to pay a small fee for instant redemption.

Monarq — majority-owned by FalconX — runs options and basis strategies as part of its core fund book and applies the same playbook to MXRPY, deciding capital allocation across the three sleeves and executing the off-chain trades directly. Flare provides the FXRP infrastructure and distribution; Upshift provides the vault rails.

“The Clearstar EarnXRP vault showed that there is real demand for XRP-denominated vaults on Flare,” said Ethan Luc, head of growth at Upshift, at the MXRPY launch. “Upshift provided the infrastructure behind that launch, and we’re now expanding the model with Monarq, a second XRP vault with a different strategy profile and a broader set of yield sources.”

D’CENT’s distribution role The cap raise is timed to absorb new flow from the 19 May D’CENT integration. Flare Smart Accounts (FSA) now lets D’CENT users deposit XRP into MXRPY directly from their hardware-secured device using just two XRPL signatures, with no new wallet, no new chain, and no FLR gas token to manage. D’CENT reports more than 330,000 hardware users and 720,000+ app users across the US, Korea, UK, Canada and Japan, with billions of XRP held across the base.

The architecture matters because it removes the friction that previously kept XRP holders out of EVM-based DeFi. FSA treats XRPL as the control layer — the memo field on each XRPL transaction encodes what should happen on Flare, and the Flare Data Connector relays a proof of the transaction to a smart contract proxy assigned to that XRPL address. The user never holds FLR, never manages a new seed phrase, and never signs an EVM transaction. Inside D’CENT, the integration appears as a featured application labelled “Idle XRP; Meet Institutional Yield,” with a direct link to the Monarq vault frontend.

The XRP Alliance context D’CENT is the lead wallet partner in the XRP Alliance, a distribution group convened by D’CENT with Flare, Doppler, Banxa and Squid joining at launch. Flare’s role in the Alliance is the programmable layer for XRP — FAssets handles trust-minimised asset representation, FSA handles chain-abstracted execution, and wallet partners handle native distribution. Together the stack is designed to support both retail flows and institutional strategy deployment.

The cap raise lands inside a broader push by Flare to position itself as the default programmable yield layer for XRPFi. Monarq’s decision to pick Flare as the venue for its first publicly distributed multi-strategy XRP vault — and the speed with which that vault has filled — is the institutional validation Flare has been working toward. The 7.5 million FXRP cap signals that next phase: capital rails capable of absorbing genuinely meaningful XRP volume rather than a launch allocation sized for testing.

$55,000 reward campaign continues Flare and D’CENT’s joint promotional campaign continues to run through to 8 June 2026, with a $55,000 reward pool across three independent quests. Quest 3 — the largest, at $40,000 — rewards users who mint FXRP via Flare Smart Accounts, deposit at least $1,000 USD in XRP value into MXRPY, and maintain the position for 30 days. Eligible users earn $10 in XRP and $10 in FLR per $1,000 USD deposited, with per-user caps of $50 in XRP and $100 in FLR.

Quests 1 and 2 cover D’CENT biometric hardware wallet purchase ($50 in XRP, $10,000 pool) and a minimum 250 XRP holding in a D’CENT wallet ($25 in FLR, $5,000 pool). With the vault cap now 15 times larger, the runway for Quest 3 participation has effectively expanded in line with the new capacity.

FAQ How much is the MXRPY deposit cap being raised?
Flare is raising the deposit cap on the Monarq XRP Yield Vault from 500,000 FXRP to 7.5 million FXRP, a 15x increase. The expansion reflects strong early demand from XRP holders since the vault’s 15 May 2026 launch and the new distribution opened up by Flare’s integration with D’CENT Wallet on 19 May.

What is MXRPY and what yield does it target?
MXRPY is a managed multi-strategy XRP yield vault on Flare, built by Monarq Asset Management on Upshift’s institutional vault infrastructure. It deploys FXRP — Flare’s trust-minimised representation of XRP — across options trading, basis and funding rate arbitrage, and on-chain XRPFi strategies, targeting approximately 3% to 4% APY. Withdrawals settle weekly on Fridays, with an option for fee-based instant redemption.

How can XRP holders access the vault?
XRP holders can access MXRPY through Upshift or directly through D’CENT Wallet via Flare Smart Accounts. The D’CENT integration requires only two XRPL signatures from the hardware device, with FXRP minting and vault deposit handled automatically inside the same flow — no new wallet, no new chain, and no FLR gas token required.

The 7.5 million FXRP cap is the most concrete sign yet that XRPFi on Flare is moving past the proving stage into production-scale capital rails. By raising the ceiling in step with the new distribution from D’CENT, Flare and Monarq are betting that meaningful XRP volume is ready to move on-chain when the experience is simple enough — and the early evidence suggests they are right. This article is informational and does not constitute investment advice.

This content is provided by a sponsor. FinanceFeeds does not independently verify the legitimacy, credibility, claims, or financial viability of the information or description of services mentioned. As such, we bear no responsibility for any potential risks, inaccuracies, or misleading representations related to the content. This post does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation and should not be treated as such. We strongly advise seeking independent financial guidance from a qualified and regulated professional before engaging in any investment or financial activities. Please review our full disclaimer for more details.

Flare CEO Hugo Philion recently appeared on the Onchain Economy, where he explained how Flare is working to expand XRP utility through FXRP. 

Commenting, XRP community figure Bank suggested that the Flare co-founder had essentially described what he believes is the “endgame” for XRP holders.

Flare’s Plan to Expand XRP Utility  In the discussion, Philion said his focus is particularly on increasing XRP’s utility through Flare’s work, further encouraging more developers to build new applications around XRP to bring in value.

He explained that Flare adds smart contract capability to the XRP Ledger and improves interoperability between blockchains. According to him, Flare is a Layer 1 network built mainly around data. 

$XRP utility is continuously expanding.

On this episode of Onchain Economy, @HugoPhilion, Co-Founder and CEO of @FlareNetworks, explains how Flare is expanding what’s possible for $XRP through interoperability.

By bringing XRP into a smart contract environment, Flare enables… pic.twitter.com/U8d9JM2t36

— RippleX (@RippleXDev) June 16, 2026

The Flare CEO noted that data infrastructure was the key innovation behind the network, noting that they designed Flare to support better communication and interaction between different systems.

To make this possible, Flare created FXRP, which connects the XRP Ledger to the Flare network. This bridge allows XRP to move into a smart contract environment where it can be used in decentralized applications instead of remaining only on its native ledger.

FXRP and New Uses for XRP in DeFi Philion shared how FXRP generates new financial uses for XRP holders. Notably, once XRP is moved into the Flare ecosystem, users can use it as collateral in lending and borrowing systems. This includes borrowing stablecoins and, in some cases, other assets such as commodities like gold.

He also explained that users can take the borrowed assets and deploy them into other markets that generate yield. This means XRP holders can earn income while still keeping exposure to their original XRP holdings.

Philion added that Flare has also built wallet integrations that let users manage XRP on Flare directly from the XRP Ledger, allowing market participants to move and control assets more smoothly across both systems without giving up custody of their original XRP.

Confidential Computing and Focus on Institutions Speaking further, the Flare CEO also discussed future upgrades, especially Flare Confidential Compute. He called it an extra layer that sits outside the main Flare blockchain but relies on Trusted Execution Environments to confirm what happens inside it.

They designed the system to support heavy applications that blockchains normally struggle with, such as AI models. He also mentioned that Flare is working on continuous AI monitoring and risk tools that can detect problems and respond when needed.

According to him, large institutions will only fully enter decentralized finance if strong privacy features exist. As a result, privacy and secure computation are basic requirements for institutional participation.

Philion further said that Flare increases what Ripple and the XRP Ledger can do with tokenized real-world assets once they are issued on-chain. To him, this creates a major growth area that benefits both Flare and the XRP ecosystem.

FXRP Launch and Early Growth FXRP officially launched on Flare mainnet last September as the first FAsset under version 1.2. 

Notably, demand was very strong from the start. The first cap of 5 million FXRP was filled in three hours. After that, the limit was increased to 15 million FXRP, and this second allocation also filled quickly.

Shortly after launch, the Xaman wallet added support for FXRP. This allowed users to mint FXRP directly from XRP Ledger wallets and marked the first stage of Flare’s plan for smoother cross-chain access.

FXRP continued to grow in the months after launch. By late October 2025, about $86.2 million worth of XRP had been bridged after more than 15 million XRP was moved over a single weekend. This pushed Flare to become the largest EVM-based DeFi ecosystem for XRP.

Flare’s liquid staking platform, Firelight, launched its first phase in December 2025. Its initial cap of 25 million FXRP filled quickly, and by around April 2026, staked XRP (stXRP) passed 50 million.

At press time, Flare hosts about 153.8 million XRP worth $180 million in its FXRP ecosystem, with up to $73.43 million staked in Firelight.

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

Table of contents

Quick Answer: XRP is trading at $1.17 on June 18, 2026, down 2.52% as the post-FOMC selloff continues. The defining XRP news this week is legislative: the CLARITY Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15-9 in May and has been placed on the Senate floor legislative calendar on June 1 — meaning a full Senate vote can happen at any time. Polymarket prices 2026 passage at 72%. If the bill passes before the July 4 target set by the White House, XRP’s digital commodity status becomes permanent federal law — a classification that no future administration can reverse with a memo. Standard Chartered and JPMorgan both project $4–8 billion in XRP ETF inflows under that scenario, three to six times the $1.44 billion accumulated to date. XRP exchange reserves have fallen to a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens. Whale wallets holding 10M+ XRP now control 68.5% of circulating supply — the highest concentration since May 2018.

Key Takeaways

CLARITY Act is on the Senate floor legislative calendar — a full Senate vote can now happen at any time, with the White House targeting July 4 signing The bill cleared Senate Banking Committee 15-9 in May, with all 13 Republicans voting yes after Sen. John Kennedy committed his support — the bipartisan vote was cleaner than feared XRP exchange reserves at a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens — 50% below the October 2025 peak of 3.76 billion, compressing available sell-side liquidity to multi-year lows RLUSD reached $1.7B market cap, ranking as the 8th-largest stablecoin globally — Mastercard added RLUSD to its 24/7 settlement network on June 3; Ripple is pursuing a Federal Reserve master account Post-FOMC pressure is the dominant short-term headwind: hawkish dot plot (9 Fed members projecting hike) outweighs XRP-specific positives in the near term — but the structural setup has rarely been this clean XRP Price Today: $1.17, Absorbing FOMC Hawkishness XRP is at $1.17 on June 18, down 2.52% with a market cap of $73.02 billion and 24-hour volume of $1.91 billion — up 14%. Of the 100 billion maximum supply, 62.05 billion circulate across 535,830 holders. Fully diluted valuation is $117.68 billion.

Today’s move is entirely macro-driven. Yesterday’s FOMC dot plot — 9 of 18 members projecting a rate hike by year-end, PCE revised to 3.6% — reset rate expectations across all risk assets. XRP is not immune to that. But what separates XRP from most assets in the current environment is the independence of its primary catalyst: the CLARITY Act moves on legislative, not monetary, logic.

The SEC case against Ripple concluded in August 2025 with a joint dismissal of appeals, confirming XRP is not a security when sold on public exchanges. Ripple paid a reduced $50 million penalty with $75 million returned as part of the settlement. Both the SEC and CFTC currently view XRP as a digital commodity, but that classification has not been written into law. An executive agency classification can be reversed by the next administration with a memo. A statute cannot. The CLARITY Act changes that permanently.

Key levels:

Resistance: $1.20 (psychological), then $1.28–$1.30 (June 15 high) Support: $1.10 (critical), then $1.00 (psychological floor) The CLARITY Act: Where It Stands Right Now The CLARITY Act was officially added to the Senate legislative calendar on June 1, after clearing the Senate Banking Committee. The next step is a full Senate vote, after which it will be sent to President Trump for signing.

The CLARITY Act passed the House 294 to 134 and cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15 to 9. The Senate floor vote is the decisive gate. The bill needs 60 votes to clear the filibuster — meaning at least 7 Democrats must cross over. The committee vote passed 15-9 with some bipartisan support, which is the baseline Democrats need to replicate on the floor.

Why 60 votes matters: The Senate has 53 Republicans. A 60-vote threshold requires 7 Democrats. The senators to watch are Warner and Cortez Masto — those votes are the hardest part of getting to 60. The Reed stablecoin amendment that nearly derailed the committee markup was defeated, keeping the bipartisan compromise language intact — a positive signal for floor vote prospects.

Prediction markets have priced 2026 signing odds around 72%. The White House has set a July 4 signing target. Senate floor time between now and July 4 is limited — the bill needs to be scheduled and voted before the Independence Day recess.

What passage does for XRP specifically: A clear commodity classification removes listing hesitancy. Exchanges that stayed cautious during the legal fight could deepen XRP support, tightening spreads and improving liquidity. Institutions need regulatory certainty before allocating. Clear rules strengthen the case for more XRP ETF products and larger inflows, building on the spot ETFs already live.

The Supply Story: Exchange Reserves at 7-Year Lows XRP exchange reserves fell to a 7-year low of 1.6 billion tokens this year, a 50% drop from October 2025’s 3.76 billion peak, compressing sell-side liquidity to multi-year lows.

This is one of the most consequential structural developments for XRP’s price setup. When exchange reserves fall this sharply, the coins leaving exchanges are going to private custody — not being sold. The implication: the supply available for large sell orders on exchanges is structurally thinner than at any point in seven years.

The number of wallets holding 10,000 or more XRP has hit an all-time high of 332,230. The millionaire tier — wallets holding over one million XRP — added 42 new addresses since January and accumulated 1.2 billion tokens in Q1 alone, the heaviest quarterly accumulation since 2023. Mega whale wallets holding 10 million or more XRP now control approximately 45.83 billion tokens, representing 68.5% of circulating supply — the highest concentration since May 2018.

The mechanism: when 68.5% of supply is controlled by conviction holders who are actively accumulating, and exchange reserves are at 7-year lows, even moderate institutional buying pressure produces outsized price moves. The float is thin. The buyers are patient. The catalyst — CLARITY Act — is binary and approaching.

RLUSD and ODL: The Utility Case Strengthening Independently While the CLARITY Act is the legislative catalyst, Ripple’s on-chain infrastructure has been strengthening independently in June 2026.

RLUSD has grown to approximately $1.7 billion in market cap, ranking as the eighth-largest stablecoin globally and live across more than 40 networks. On June 3, Mastercard added RLUSD to its 24/7 on-chain settlement network alongside USDC and PYUSD.

Ripple is also pursuing a Federal Reserve master account, a process currently paused until end of 2026. A Fed master account would allow Ripple to settle transactions directly with the Federal Reserve’s payment system — removing commercial bank intermediaries and dramatically reducing the cost of ODL corridor transactions. It is potentially the most significant operational milestone in Ripple’s history, but it is a 2027 story at the earliest.

Ripple, JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo Finance completed a live cross-border tokenized US Treasury settlement on the XRP Ledger that finalized in under five seconds. This is not speculative — it is a completed transaction by the largest financial institutions in the world, settling real assets on Ripple’s infrastructure. The XRPL’s real-world asset capabilities are being validated in production, not just theory.

Price Scenarios: What CLARITY Act Means in Dollar Terms From around $1.17 where XRP trades now, the key scenarios are: a failed Senate vote points back toward the $0.80–$1.00 range; passage near the recess supports a re-rating to $1.60–$2.20; and passage plus renewed ETF inflows and a softer Fed opens up the $2.50–$3.50 price range.

Standard Chartered projected $4 billion to $8 billion in cumulative XRP ETF inflows by year-end if the bill passes. With flows of such volume, XRP would most likely break the current resistance, retest its 200-day moving average at $1.80, and have the runway to push toward higher targets like $3–5 by late 2026.

The bear case: If Tim Scott doesn’t schedule the markup before Memorial Day recess on May 21, or if the markup happens but Republicans can’t unify the committee vote, the bill will most likely be shelved until 2030. That deadline has now passed — the committee vote cleared 15-9. The next hard deadline is the July 4 recess. If the Senate floor vote does not happen before July 4, the next viable legislative window is after the November 2026 midterms.

For context on the current macro environment affecting all crypto assets, see our daily market update for June 18.

ETF Flows: $1.44 Billion, UBS and Bank of America Positioned US spot XRP ETFs have accumulated $1.44 billion in cumulative net inflows since their November 2025 launch across seven products. May 2026 was the strongest single month with $132 million. UBS and Bank of America took first-time XRP ETF stakes in May — the first tier-1 global banks to allocate directly to XRP products. Goldman Sachs allocated $154 million in Q1 2026.

Some of that CLARITY Act move may already be in the price, because the market has watched this bill advance for months. So the real question is not whether clarity helps XRP, but how much of the waiting money actually moves once the bill is law, and how much already has.

The honest assessment: the ETF bid is real and growing. The question of how much is already priced is legitimate. What is not priced is the pension fund and sovereign wealth fund allocation tier — those institutional buyers legally cannot allocate under agency guidance. They need a statute. The CLARITY Act is that statute.

Track real-time XRP ETF flows at SoSoValue.

Where to Buy XRP Binance — world’s largest exchange by volume, deep XRP/USDT liquidity, RLUSD trading pairs available.

Coinbase — US-regulated, XRP available for spot purchase with insured custody.

Kraken — established 2011, competitive XRP fees and strong security record.

KuCoin — wide XRP trading pairs, access to XRP ecosystem tokens.

Gate.io — RLUSD listed here alongside XRP, natural venue for XRP/RLUSD strategies.

OKX — advanced XRP derivatives, competitive funding rates.

This article does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile. Always conduct independent research before making investment decisions.

Enosys’ Liquity will enable XRP holders to mint overcollateralized stablecoins on Flare, with mechanisms to ensure the assets maintain values close to $1.

The Web3 software development entity Enosys has introduced a new type of stablecoin loan to the interoperability layer-1 network, Flare. These loans are backed by Ripple’s native cryptocurrency, XRP.

According to a press release sent to CryptoPotato, a Collateralized Debt Position (CDP) protocol will power the loans. It will allow XRP holders to mint overcollateralized stablecoins on Flare.

First XRP-backed Stablecoin Loans on Flare Enosys explained that the XRP holdings will back the stablecoins, ensuring they maintain a value close to $1. Through this approach, XRP holders can access the value of their assets without having to sell them.

The CDP protocol to be deployed on Flare is called Liquity. Enosys claims Liquity is one of the most tried and trusted protocols in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Since its launch in 2021, the network has secured billions of dollars in collateral and kept its stablecoin peg amid extreme market conditions.

One mechanism at the core of Liquity’s success is the protocol’s stability pool. The pool allows users to stake their stablecoins for yield coming from mint fees, liquidation rewards, and interests paid on loans. This mechanism makes sure the protocol can cover outstanding debt in the event of liquidation.

Enosys will release a fork of Liquity V2 on Flare, maintaining the features that made the first version trusted. The only changes made will be upgrades like protocol-incentivized liquidity, capital efficiency, and user-set borrowing rates.

Access to DeFi Yield Opportunities The alliance between Enosys and Flare will affect a select Flare-native tokens for now. They include Flare XRP (FXRP) and Wrapped Flare (wFLR). The companies intend to expand the capabilities to staked XRP (stXRP) soon, allowing Ripple holders to put their assets to work.

You may also like: XRP’s Price Could Explode to $8, But This One Zone Is Holding It Back 5 Reasons Why Bitcoin Just Crashed Below $63K as Liquidations Top $500M XRP’s Biggest Warning Sign Is Still Flashing Despite Easing Whale Activity Users can lock their FXRP on Flare and mint a stablecoin, which can provide liquidity and access to DeFi yield opportunities. While borrowers can set the annual percentage rate (APR) they’re willing to pay, lower rates come with a price. If the stablecoin falls below its $1 peg, loans with the lowest interest rates will be redeemed first.

“This is just the beginning. By bringing a proven model like Liquity V2 to Flare, we’re laying the foundation for stable, decentralized liquidity powered by XRP and enhanced by liquid staking,” the Enosys team stated.

Meanwhile, Enosys Loans will also be utilizing data from the Flare Time Series Oracle (FTSO) to implement decentralized collateral pricing.

Tags:

David Schwartz has announced that he will step down as Ripple's chief technology officer at the end of the year after more than 13 years at the company. 

"The time has come for me to step back from my day-to-day duties as Ripple CTO at the end of this year. I’m really looking forward to spending more time with the kids and grandkids and going back to the hobbies I set aside," he said. 

Schwartz was appointed as the company's CTO back in July 2018. Before him, this role was held by Coil CEO Stefan Thomas and Ripple/Stellar co-founder Jed McCaleb. 

HOT Stories

In his statement, Schwartz stressed his appreciation for the company and the community, describing his time at Ripple as "one of the greatest honors and experiences of his life." 

As happens in one’s life, I’ve been taking stock of my last 40 years. It’s been a wild ride. I’ve gone from consulting for the NSA to watching the early stages of Bitcoin. Then, I met Arthur, Jed, and Chris and worked on coding the XRP Ledger. Now, I’ve spent more than 13 years…

— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) September 30, 2025 He has also expressed his gratitude to Ripple's leadership (CEO Brad Garlinghouse and President Monica Long), co-founders Chris Larsen and Arthur Britto, as well as the RippleX team. 

Joining board of directorsSchwartz has confirmed that he is not breaking ties with Ripple. In fact, he will be joining the company's board of directors. He will also remain involved as CTO Emeritus. 

"I look forward to seeing the rest of you at XRP community events around the world," he said in a statement. 

"You are my boss now?" Ripple's leadership has already reacted to Schwartz's upcoming exit. Garlinghouse has described Schwartz as "the smartest (and maybe the funniest) person" he personally knows. "A true OG in crypto with the conviction and vision to see what others couldn’t - you are a legend," he added. 

He has also jokingly suggested that Schwartz will be his boss after joining the company's board of directors. 

The smartest (and maybe the funniest) person I know. A true OG in crypto with the conviction and vision to see what others couldn’t - you are a legend. Thank you David for everything you’ve done for the industry, for Ripple and for the XRP Ledger. We are all forever grateful…… https://t.co/tt4uX4JlkV

— Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) September 30, 2025 Long has acknowledged that the "mighty community" would not have existed without Schwartz. "I deeply respect your ingenuity, integrity, humor, and humility, which you demonstrate daily..." Long said. 

The volume of XRP bridged by market participants to the Coreum network has surged by 2,703%, reaching 1.6 million tokens within a span of two weeks.

Since the launch of the Coreum blockchain last March, the team behind the project has continued to make efforts toward interoperability with other chains. The latest effort involved the introduction of a two-way bridge between Coreum and the XRP Ledger (XRPL).

Data indicates that the bridge, which facilitates seamless movement of XRP and other assets between the XRPL and Coreum, has continued to garner attention from network participants. This has resulted in the Coreum ecosystem welcoming over 1 million XRP tokens.

It bears mentioning that the bridge functionality went live on March 12, but access was limited. However, The Crypto Basic reported that the number of XRP holders on Coreum spiked 2,287% to 191 on March 22, with the total number of bridged XRP tokens sitting at 57,191, two days after the public launch of the bridge on March 20.

Coreum Now Home to 1.6M+ XRP Since then, network participants have continued to leverage the bridge, with the Sologenic team confirming in a recent post that the amount of XRP tokens on Coreum has crossed the 1,600,000 million mark.

Over 1,600,000+ $XRP are living on the @cosmos ecosystem using the XRPL Coreum Bridge.

Supercharge your XRPL-native assets today.

🌉: https://t.co/slbv3wKNS5#GoSolo #BridgeToTheCore pic.twitter.com/5RTRGYRMys

— Sologenic (@realSologenic) April 8, 2024

The latest data from Coreum’s official blockchain explorer indicates that the Coreum ecosystem is now home to exactly 1,603,209 XRP tokens. This figure represents an impressive 2,703% increase in XRP tokens domiciled on the network since March 22. 

XRP Tokens on Coreum | Coreum Explorer Notably, these 1.6 million XRP tokens are held by 464 addresses on Coreum, with the total number of holders representing a 142% increase from the figure recorded during the previous report. Interestingly, nearly 1.2 million of the 1.6 million XRP is in liquidity pools on Coreum-based DEX Pulsara.

And close to 1.2 million of that $XRP is in Liquidity Pools in #PulsaraDAX, generating rewards! #SARA #DAX https://t.co/CrRrH6E4dP

— Pulsara (@pulsara_io) April 9, 2024

An Imminent Supply Shock?  The recent disclosure has sparked reactions from the XRP community, as the movement of XRP tokens to Coreum could help take off more tokens from the market. For context, when a user bridges XRP to Coreum, the actual XRPL-based XRP tokens are locked in the bridge contract. 

The bridge then mints an equivalent of the XRP tokens on Coreum. Despite receiving the equivalent of XRP on Coreum, market participants would not be holding their XRPL-based XRP. This phenomenon keeps the XRPL-based XRP locked in the bridge contract, keeping them from the market and reducing supply.

Media personality Zach Rector called attention to this in a response to Coreum’s disclosure. He stressed that his previous projection of an imminent XRP supply shock could materialize. According to him, this would occur with more bridges and increased XRP burns as adoption leads to a rise in on-chain activity.

Wow! Y’all that I was playing when I said there would be an #XRP Supply Shock!
This is just the start of bridges, DeFi and XRP being locked up! Also, as activity picks up, more XRP is being BURNED! 🔥 https://t.co/hr3wQf0qjS

— Zach Rector (@ZachRector7) April 9, 2024

Interestingly, several XRP community figures, including Ghostpunch Games’ Chad Steingraber, previously expressed similar sentiments regarding a looming supply shock for XRP.

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

Ripple chief legal officer Stuart Alderoty says the recent filing by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in its case against Ripple Labs does not appeal the ruling that XRP is not a security.

Alderoty’s comments follow an Oct. 16 Form C filing by the SEC with a pre-judgement statement against certain aspects of the court’s summary judgment. 

Alderoty Says Court Decision Regarding XRP’s Security Status “Stands As The Law Of The Land” Ripple defense attorney James Filan shared the filing on Oct. 17. In their appeal, the SEC asks the court to review its decisions related to Ripple’s XRP sales through exchange platforms. It also requests the court to review the ruling on the personal sales executed by Ripple executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.

The SEC went on to argue that Larsen and Galinghouse violated securities laws by offering and selling XRP. It also said that they both “aided and abetted Ripple’s violations of those provisions.”

Alderoty responded to the SEC’s request by saying that the court’s decision regarding XRP’s security status “stands as the law of the land.” He added that the fintech firm intends to file its own Form C next week.

No surprises here — once again it’s been made clear. The Court’s ruling that “XRP is not a security” is NOT being appealed. That decision stands as the law of the land.

Stay tuned for Ripple’s Form C to be filed next week. https://t.co/m9molUGSBv

— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) October 18, 2024

SEC Ripple Case Expected To Continue Through July 2025 According to a timeline shared by Fox Business producer Eleanor Terret on X, the Ripple SEC case could carry on well into July next year. After Ripple files its own Form C next week, both the regulator and Ripple Labs will need to “agree on a briefing schedule.” 

🚨NEW: Just had a great chat with @s_alderoty of @Ripple who gave me a rundown of the appeals timeline.

📌The @SECGov’s last day to file Form C (which will give some level of detail about what it plans to appeal) is tomorrow.

📌Seven days later, Ripple will file its own Form…

— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) October 15, 2024

Thereafter, the SEC will have up to 90 days to file its first brief according to Terrett, who cited Alderoty. She added that Alderoty believes the regulator will take advantage of this period, and try to only make its filing at the end of the 90 days. Thereafter, the full briefing process “will go through July 2025,” according to the Ripple legal chief.

Related Articles: DOGE Surges 8% After Elon Musk Unveils Details Of Department Of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E) Pepe Unchained Shatters $20M Mark In Presale, Unveils New Updates Goatseus Maximus Price Prediction: GOAT Surges 15%, But Analysts Say This Meme Coin Staking Platform Might Be The Best Crypto To Buy Now Best Wallet - Diversify Your Crypto Portfolio

Our Rating

Easy to Use, Feature-Driven Crypto Wallet Get Early Access to Upcoming Token ICOs Multi-Chain, Multi-Wallet, Non-Custodial Now On App Store, Google Play Stake To Earn Native Token $BEST 250,000+ Monthly Active Users

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

Ripple failed to dismiss the lawsuit alleging XRP tokens are unregistered securities. The action could “upend and threaten to destroy the established XRP market,” said the motion.

Ripple Fights Lawsuit Over XRP In early August 2019, a complaint was filed against Ripple arguing that its XRP tokens are unregistered securities under U.S. law. The filing represented an update to a lawsuit filed against the San Francisco-based startup in May 2018.

The complaint argues that Ripple violated California’s securities laws and engaged in false advertising and unfair competition. Ripple allegedly blurred differences between its enterprise solutions and XRP to further drive demand. The startup even paid exchanges to list the token.

Additionally, Ripple reportedly limited the supply of XRP to drive price appreciation and made false statements, claiming that the digital asset is not a security.

Advertisement

While the plaintiff demanded XRP to be recognized as a security and compensation for incurred losses, Ripple filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in September 2019, claiming the case was not brought forward in a timely manner.

Now, a court document filed on February 26 reveals that Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the Court of the Northern District of California dismissed Ripple’s claims that the plaintiff failed to act in a timely manner.

That said, Hamilton also recognized that the company did not violate California state law. As a result, claims of false advertising were dismissed as well as claims of personal liability against Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse.

XRP Could Be Deemed a Security Since the case remains open and the plaintiff can amend the complaint, Ripple believes that moving forward with it could “destroy the established XRP market.”

“Were Plaintiff allowed to belatedly challenge the classification of XRP, it would not only threaten to eliminate XRP’s utility as a currency, but it would upend and threaten to destroy the established XRP market more broadly […] potentially wiping out the value held by the alleged thousands of individual XRP holders around the world,” read the motion to dismiss.

Ripple fears that XRP would experience something similar to what happened to other cryptocurrencies after the SEC sought enforcement action.

In early June 2019, for instance, the SEC sued Kik for conducting an illegal $100 million initial coin offering. The Commission sought a permanent injunction, disgorgement plus interest, and a penalty. Following the charges, the price of KIN collapsed nearly 90%.

A similar market reaction occurred to Veritaseum after the SEC filed a complaint against its CEO Reginald Middleton for conducting an unregistered ICO. VERI token plummeted nearly 60% after the enforcement action.

Even though the legality of XRP remains uncertain, it seems to stands out as a potential security under U.S. regulations, according to the Crypto Rating Council. The organization maintains that XRP was initially sold without clear utility and was marketed with “securities-like language.” Within CRC’s assessment, the token has many “characteristics strongly consistent with treatment as a security.”

Many industry leaders believe that the SEC would have taken action by now if it thought XRP was a security. However, fintech lawyer Jake Chervinsky maintains that the regulatory agency’s enforcement “moves slowly under the best of circumstances” and may be on hold until the lawsuit “wraps up.”

Disclosure: This article was edited by Ali Martinez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

The Diamond Tokenization SetupBilliton Diamond and Ctrl Alt moved over AED 1 billion ($280 million) worth of certified polished diamonds on-chain in the UAE. 

Ripple’s enterprise custody tools secure the physical diamonds, while the XRP Ledger creates digital tokens representing ownership.

Adding to its infrastructure push, Ripple secured full Electronic Money Institution approval from Luxembourg’s financial regulator last week, pushing its global regulatory approvals beyond 75. 

This follows recent UK approvals, reinforcing Ripple’s position as one of the most heavily licensed crypto firms.

The Regulatory RoadblockThe broader platform launch requires approval from Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA). 

Until then, the $280 million represents a controlled pilot rather than an open marketplace.

Critical details remain unclear.

The companies did not explain how someone holding a diamond token would redeem it for the physical stone, what the minimum purchase size would be, or how individual stones get priced—all essential for real trading.

Dubai’s DMCC coordinated the project as the emirate positions itself as a hub for tokenizing real-world assets like commodities and luxury goods.

The Trading ChallengeCreating blockchain tokens for diamonds is the easy part.

The harder challenge is building a marketplace where these tokens actually trade with reliable prices and smooth redemptions.

Each diamond is unique, with individual characteristics affecting value—cut, clarity, color, and carat weight. 

This makes pricing more complex than tokenizing gold or oil, where units are identical and fungible.

The companies acknowledged this hurdle, mentioning a longer development timeline for features like custody transfers and secondary-market trading. 

However, without concrete plans for redemption mechanics and pricing, questions remain about moving beyond the pilot phase.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

A redemption that used to take days cleared in about five seconds. The names in the room matter more than the speed, and the question for XRP holders is where the token actually sits in the flow.

Summary

JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo, and Ripple tested tokenized Treasury redemption on the XRP Ledger. The settlement speed matters, but the institutional names matter more. XRP was not the asset being redeemed, but it can sit in fees, reserves, and routing. The long-term signal is utility; the near-term question is whether volume follows. On June 12, JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance, and Ripple completed a test that moved a tokenized United States Treasury through a full redemption on the XRP Ledger. The settlement finished in roughly five seconds.

The same operation on traditional rails takes three to five business days. crypto.news shared the result the day it happened, and within hours the XRP community had folded it into the familiar story: another institution, another marquee logo, another reason the token should be worth more than it is.

NEW: JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance and Ripple complete tokenized Treasury redemption test on XRP Ledger. Settlement took roughly 5 seconds compared to 3 to 5 business days on traditional rails pic.twitter.com/9Rkd3MkWF4

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) June 12, 2026 The speed is real and the participants are real. What deserves a closer look is the part the headlines skip, which is the exact role XRP the asset plays when a tokenized Treasury changes hands on its ledger.

That answer is more interesting than a simple win or loss. It sets the boundary on how much a holder should read into the news.

What actually happened on June 12 Strip the announcement down to its parts and the test looks like this. Ondo Finance issued a tokenized version of a short-dated United States Treasury instrument, the kind of product that wraps a real government bond into an on-chain token that pays the yield of the underlying paper.

Mastercard provided the link between the regulated money layer and the chain through its Multi-Token Network, the rails it has been building to let banks move tokenized deposits and settle against tokenized assets. JPMorgan brought its institutional settlement infrastructure to the bank side of the trade.

Ripple supplied the ledger and the surrounding tooling that let the redemption clear on the XRP Ledger instead of on a private bank network.

A redemption is the moment a holder hands the token back and receives cash value in return. In the legacy world, that round trip crawls through custodians, transfer agents, and settlement windows that only open on business days.

The test compressed that into a single near-instant on-chain event, with the cash leg and the asset leg settling together instead of days apart. Atomic settlement, where both sides of a trade move or neither does, removes the gap during which one party holds an asset and waits to be paid.

That gap is where counterparty risk lives, and closing it is the entire point of putting this kind of asset on a fast public ledger. So the result is a working proof that a tokenized Treasury can be issued, held, and redeemed across a chain that major financial firms were willing to touch.

That is not nothing. It is also not the same thing as production volume, and the difference is where careful readers should slow down.

The logos are the story, up to a point Each name on the June 12 test carries weight, and the weight is worth spelling out because the market tends to treat any JPMorgan headline as a verdict.

JPMorgan has spent years building Kinexys, formerly Onyx, its blockchain settlement arm that already moves large daily volumes in tokenized deposits. When a bank of that size agrees to run a redemption across the XRP Ledger, even as a test, it signals that the ledger met its internal bar for security and controls.

Mastercard has been pushing its Multi-Token Network as the connective tissue between banks and tokenized assets, and its presence shows the test was built to plug into existing card-network plumbing instead of standing alone as a crypto experiment. Ondo is one of the larger issuers of tokenized Treasuries, and its OUSG product has become a reference point for the whole real-world-asset category.

Ripple sat at the center as the ledger host and the firm whose institutional features made the settlement possible. Put together, the group reads as a deliberate signal that tokenized Treasuries can settle on the XRP Ledger with names that compliance departments recognize.

JPMorgan, Mastercard, Ondo Finance and Ripple just completed something quietly historic.

The first cross-border tokenized US Treasury redemption on the XRP Ledger.

Cleared in under 5 seconds.

Traditional settlement for this kind of transaction takes days.

Tokenized assets… pic.twitter.com/9uk5akaVRf

— Rose (@Rose09202) June 21, 2026 The temptation is to draw a straight line from that signal to the XRP price. Before drawing it, look at what moved through the transaction and what did not.

Why tokenized Treasuries are the wedge asset It is no accident that the test used a Treasury and not some exotic instrument. Among all the assets the industry has tried to move on-chain, short-dated government debt has become the wedge that opens the institutional door, and the reasons say a lot about why June 12 happened at all.

A Treasury bill is the simplest large asset to tokenize honestly. It has a known issuer, a known maturity, a yield that is easy to verify, and a price that barely moves day to day.

There is little argument about what it is worth, which means a token wrapped around it can be marked with confidence and redeemed without disputes. Compare that to tokenized real estate or private credit, where valuation is slow, subjective, and easy to challenge, and the appeal of starting with Treasuries becomes obvious.

The asset removes the hardest problem in tokenization, which is agreeing on value, so the experiment can focus on the plumbing. That is why tokenization as the real story keeps coming back to Treasuries: they are liquid, familiar, yield-bearing, and easy for institutions to understand.

The demand is also concrete. Crypto firms, trading desks, and treasuries sit on large idle dollar balances, often parked in stablecoins that pay them nothing.

A tokenized Treasury lets that cash earn the yield of real government paper while staying on-chain, available to move at any hour without leaving for the banking system. That single feature, on-chain dollars that earn a real yield, has turned tokenized Treasuries into one of the fastest-growing corners of the whole digital-asset market.

Ondo’s OUSG and a handful of competitors have pulled in billions because they answer a question every on-chain treasurer has, which is how to stop leaving money on the table.

So when Ripple wanted to prove the XRP Ledger could host serious institutional settlement, the Treasury was the natural choice. It is the asset most likely to move in real size, the one institutions most want on-chain, and the one with the fewest excuses for the test to fail.

Winning the Treasury-settlement business is the beachhead. Everything heavier, corporate bonds, funds, structured credit, follows the rail that first proves itself on the simple asset.

Where XRP actually sits in the transaction Here is the part that gets lost. In the June 12 flow, the asset being moved was a tokenized Treasury. The cash leg most likely settled in a stablecoin or a tokenized deposit.

XRP, the native token of the ledger, was not the thing being bought, sold, or redeemed.

That sounds like bad news for the holder thesis, and read too quickly it would be. The reality is more layered.

XRP touches a settlement like this in three indirect ways, and each one is small per transaction but structural across millions of them.

First, every transaction on the XRP Ledger burns a tiny amount of XRP as a fee. The amounts are fractions of a cent, designed to stop spam, not to enrich anyone.

As transaction count rises, the burn rises with it, which slowly removes XRP from supply. Second, accounts and certain ledger objects require a reserve denominated in XRP, so a ledger that hosts more institutional activity locks up more XRP in reserves.

Third, and most important over time, XRP can serve as the auto-bridge asset when one currency or token needs to move into another inside the ledger’s exchange. In a redemption that converts a tokenized Treasury back into a chosen settlement currency, XRP can sit in the middle as the routing asset that connects the two sides.

While the market obsesses over price action, XRPL just processed another milestone settlement blending JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo Finance rails.

This cross-border tokenized Treasury redemption cleared on XRPL in under five seconds using RLUSD as the settlement asset and a… pic.twitter.com/eDw8SQm88z

— documenting XRP (@documentingXRPP) June 21, 2026 None of those roles require XRP to be the headline asset in the trade. All three grow with usage, not with hype.

That is the honest frame: the June 12 test does not put XRP at the center of the transaction, but it does feed the machinery where XRP earns its keep. Whether that machinery turns fast enough to matter for price is a separate question, and the search history of XRP suggests patience is warranted.

This is also what the tokenized Treasury settlement means for XRP: the ledger can win serious institutional use before the token captures meaningful demand. The two are connected, but not identical.

The ledger features that made it possible A redemption like this could not have run on the XRP Ledger of a few years ago. The capability is new, and it comes from a stack of institutional features Ripple and the wider XRPL developer community shipped across 2025 and into 2026.

Multi-Purpose Tokens, the MPT standard, let a token carry the metadata that a real financial instrument needs, things like maturity dates, transfer restrictions, and tranche information, without forcing developers to bolt on fragile smart contracts. Permissioned Domains and a permissioned version of the ledger’s decentralized exchange let regulated participants trade in gated environments where access depends on credentials such as know-your-customer checks.

RLUSD, Ripple’s dollar stablecoin, now settles on the ledger and gives institutions a compliant cash leg that lives on the same rail as the asset. The escrow feature was extended to support third-party tokens like RLUSD, which matters for structured settlement.

Layer the XLS-66 lending protocol on top, with its single-asset vaults that isolate credit risk one asset at a time, and the ledger starts to look less like a payments network and more like a settlement venue with a credit layer attached. The June 12 test is the visible output of that quieter build.

The features were the precondition. The redemption was the demonstration that they hold together under the eyes of firms that do not lend their names casually.

The competition for the same settlement business The XRP Ledger is not the only chain courting this work, and the contest for institutional settlement is the backdrop that gives June 12 its real stakes.

Ethereum sits at the center of the tokenized-asset world today. Most tokenized Treasuries, including the largest funds from the biggest asset managers, launched on Ethereum or its layer-2 networks, where the deepest pool of developers and the most established custody and compliance tooling already live.

An institution choosing where to settle starts from a world in which Ethereum is the default, and the burden falls on every other chain to give a reason to look elsewhere. Solana has pushed hard on speed and cost and has won its own share of tokenization projects and corporate interest.

On top of the public chains, the banks are building private ones. JPMorgan’s own settlement network already moves enormous daily volumes inside a permissioned environment the bank controls end to end.

Against that field, the XRP Ledger’s pitch is specific. It offers settlement built for payments from the start, with the institutional features, the MPT standard, permissioned trading, credentials, baked into the base layer instead of bolted on through smart contracts that have to be audited one project at a time.

The argument is that a purpose-built settlement ledger carries less risk surface than a general-purpose smart-contract chain, because there is less custom code between an institution and a completed trade. June 12 is Ripple making that argument in public with partners who could have run the same test anywhere.

This is why the names matter more than the speed. Five-second settlement is achievable on several chains.

What the XRP Ledger needed to prove was that firms like JPMorgan and Mastercard would choose it for a real institutional flow when they had every other option available. The test does not win the war.

It wins the right to be in the room for the next one, which for a chain competing against Ethereum’s incumbency is the harder thing to secure.

Following one tokenized Treasury through the flow Abstractions blur the stakes, so trace a single unit through the kind of cycle the test modeled.

Start with a short-dated United States Treasury bill sitting in a custodian’s account. Ondo, or an issuer like it, holds that bill and mints an on-chain token against it.

The token represents a claim on the bill and the yield it throws off. Call it one unit of a tokenized Treasury, and place it in the wallet of an institutional holder who wants short-term dollar yield without leaving the chain.

For weeks, the holder simply holds. The token accrues the bill’s yield.

When the holder decides to exit, the redemption begins. The holder submits the token back toward the issuer through the settlement arrangement that JPMorgan and Mastercard stand behind.

On the ledger, the asset leg and the cash leg are matched so they settle as one event. The token is retired.

A settlement currency, most likely RLUSD or a tokenized deposit, lands in the holder’s wallet in return. The fee for the ledger transactions is paid in XRP and burned.

If the chosen settlement currency differs from the currency the token was priced in, the ledger’s exchange can route through XRP as the bridge to complete the swap. Total elapsed time: around five seconds.

Compare that to the legacy path, where the same redemption would route through a transfer agent, wait for a settlement window, and clear across three to five business days while both sides carry risk. The end state is identical.

The holder is out of the Treasury and into cash. The path is what changed, and the path is the product.

Notice where XRP appeared in that walk. It paid the fee. It may have bridged the currencies. It backed the account reserves.

It was never the asset the holder set out to trade. That is the shape of XRP’s role in institutional settlement, and it explains why utility can climb for years while the token price moves sideways.

What institutions actually buy beyond the five seconds The speed grabs the headline, but settlement time is not the only thing an institution gains, and the other gains explain why firms keep running these tests even when the token economics do not concern them.

The first gain is capital efficiency. In the legacy model, the days between trade and settlement are days during which capital sits frozen, posted as margin or held in reserve against the risk that the other side fails to deliver.

Collapse settlement to seconds and that frozen capital comes free, available to be deployed elsewhere. For a large trading desk, the value of unlocking capital that used to sit idle for three days at a time runs into real money across a year of activity.

The second gain is around-the-clock operation. Traditional settlement runs on banking hours and business days, so a Friday trade waits through the weekend.

An on-chain ledger settles at any hour, which matters more every year as markets globalize and the line between trading days blurs. The third gain is collateral mobility.

A tokenized Treasury that settles instantly can be moved, pledged, or redeemed the moment it is needed, which lets the same asset work harder as collateral across more uses.

These are the reasons a JPMorgan or a Mastercard cares about the test, and none of them depend on XRP the token doing anything. The institution is buying a better settlement process.

XRP earns its small dues in the background. Keeping those two things separate is the key to reading any announcement like this one without mistaking institutional interest in the ledger for institutional demand for the token.

The first is clearly growing. The second has to be inferred from on-chain flow, and the inference is where most of the disappointment in XRP’s price history has come from.

That is why Ripple’s IPO and XRP holders is part of the same broader lesson. Ripple’s success, XRPL adoption, and XRP holder value are related, but they do not automatically collapse into the same thing.

Does settlement volume reach the price? This is the question every holder actually wants answered, and it deserves a straight treatment, not a number pulled from the air.

The bullish case runs through the indirect roles. If tokenized Treasuries and similar real-world assets move onto the XRP Ledger in size, transaction counts climb, fee burn climbs, reserves lock up more supply, and bridge routing pulls XRP into more flows.

Demand for the token then rises from use instead of from speculation, and demand that comes from use tends to be stickier. Ripple has framed exactly this flywheel in its institutional materials, and the logic holds on its own terms.

The sober case sits in the math. Fee burn on the XRP Ledger is deliberately tiny.

Even a large jump in institutional transactions removes a small fraction of supply against the tens of billions of XRP already in circulation and the monthly escrow releases that add to it. Bridge routing only pulls in XRP when a trade actually needs a currency conversion that the ledger chooses to route through XRP, and many institutional flows will settle stablecoin to stablecoin without ever touching the token.

Reserves lock supply but do not create buy pressure on their own. There is a supply side to weigh as well, and it cuts against the burn story in the near term.

Ripple releases up to one billion XRP from escrow at the start of each month, then re-locks most of it, but the net new supply that reaches the market still runs into the hundreds of millions of tokens monthly. For fee burn from institutional settlement to tighten supply in any meaningful way, the volume would have to grow large enough to offset that steady release, which is a high bar at current transaction levels.

A holder who pins hopes on burn alone is betting that on-chain activity climbs by orders of magnitude while the escrow schedule keeps running on its long-set path. That can happen over years. It does not happen because of one test.

The careful reading is that the June 12 test strengthens the long-term utility argument and does little for the short-term price argument. XRP spent most of 2026 trading near or below the one-dollar-and-change range while news exactly like this piled up, which is the market telling you that proofs of concept are priced as proofs of concept until volume follows.

A settlement test is a door opening. Walking through it at scale is a different event, and the token tends to wait for the second one.

What has to be true for this to matter For the June 12 result to move from interesting to important, a few things need to happen, and naming them gives a holder a watchlist instead of a hope.

Production volume has to follow the test. One redemption proves the plumbing.

Recurring institutional flow, measured in real daily value rather than pilot transactions, is what feeds the burn-and-bridge machinery. Regulatory clarity has to land, because the CLARITY Act and the broader United States market-structure framework decide how freely regulated institutions can settle tokenized assets on public ledgers.

Until the rules set, much of this activity stays in the test-and-pilot stage where the June 12 work lives. That is why CLARITY’s XRP classification question matters: the technology can be ready before the legal framework gives the rest of Wall Street permission to use it.

Competing venues have to be held off, since Ethereum, Solana, and a wave of bank-built private chains are chasing the same tokenized-asset settlement business, and the XRP Ledger has to keep winning the names that make compliance teams comfortable.

If those line up, the indirect demand argument gets a real chance to show up in on-chain data, and from there in price. If they stall, June 12 joins the long list of XRP headlines that read well and changed little.

The token has taught its holders that lesson more than once. That is also why institutional positioning in XRP matters as a separate signal: ETFs show who wants exposure, while settlement flows show whether utility is becoming demand.

Reading the signal without inflating it The clean takeaway is that Ripple, with JPMorgan, Mastercard, and Ondo alongside it, proved that a tokenized Treasury can be issued and redeemed on the XRP Ledger in seconds, with names that the institutional world takes seriously.

That is a meaningful step for the ledger as a settlement venue. For XRP the asset, it is a vote for the long-term utility thesis and a weak input to the near-term price, because the token sits in the fees, the reserves, and the bridge rather than at the center of the trade.

A holder who understands that distinction will not oversell the day and will not dismiss it either. The machinery that pays XRP its small, repeated dues got a high-profile workout.

Now the only thing that turns that into price is the boring part, which is volume that shows up and keeps showing up. Watch the on-chain flow, watch the rules, and let the token follow the usage instead of the logos.

This article is information, not investment advice. Figures and partnership details reflect reporting available as of June 23, 2026, and corporate plans, test results, and market conditions can change.