Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

When SpaceX went public, the only place most of the world could short it was Hyperliquid, where a perpetual future tracked the IPO of the decade tick for tick, and a whale ran a $14 million leveraged short no brokerage would have offered. Equity perps are the first crypto product Wall Street cannot ignore, and regulators cannot place, and this is the audit of what they actually are.

Summary

Hyperliquid, the dominant on-chain derivatives venue with roughly 70% of decentralized perpetuals volume and around $1.3 billion in annualized fees, now lists perpetual futures on stocks, with its SpaceX contract as the breakout case. The SPCX perp traded the IPO of the decade before, during, and after the listing, ran to a $228.74 high alongside the stock’s $225.64 peak, tracked its 48% collapse, and hosted positions like a 10x-leveraged $14 million short paired with a 40x $60 million Bitcoin short, structures no retail brokerage offers. Equity perps deliver what the equity market rations: 24/7 trading, high leverage, short exposure without locates or borrow fees, and access for the global majority locked out of US brokerage accounts, all against an oracle price and a funding rate instead of shares. The product’s honesty requires its limits: holders own no equity, no dividend, no claim, only a synthetic exposure whose integrity depends on oracle quality and venue solvency, on platforms mostly outside US jurisdiction. The regulatory placement is unresolved by design: synthetic equity exposure with no share changing hands sits between the SEC’s securities world and the CFTC’s derivatives world, on infrastructure neither reaches, and the CLARITY-era jurisdiction map does not cover it. The most interesting trade of June was not in a stock. When SpaceX completed the largest IPO in history and its shares began their 48% descent, an anonymous trader on Hyperliquid, the blockchain derivatives venue, was running a combined position no prime broker would have blessed and no retail app could have executed: a $60 million Bitcoin short at 40x leverage paired with a $14 million short on SPCX at 10x, a pure bet on the deflation of the year’s twin euphorias, placed on rails that never close, require no borrow, and asked no questions.

The instrument making it possible, the equity perpetual future, is the crypto industry’s quiet invasion of the stock market: a synthetic contract that tracks a share price via oracle, settles in stablecoins, charges longs or shorts a funding rate to keep the peg, and trades around the clock at leverage American brokerages reserve for institutions, on venues most of the world can reach with a wallet.

Hyperliquid’s SPCX contract, born before the IPO priced and still trading through the stock’s every convulsion, is the product’s proof of concept and its perfect case study, and this piece uses it as one: what equity perps actually are, what they genuinely fix, what they quietly are not, and why the regulatory map, freshly redrawn for crypto by the CLARITY era, has no square for them at all.

The machine: how a stock trades without shares An equity perpetual is three mechanisms in a trench coat, and each deserves one honest paragraph.

The first is the oracle. No share of SpaceX exists anywhere in the system; the contract’s reference is a price feed, assembled from the listed market’s data during exchange hours and from the perp’s own supply and demand when Nasdaq sleeps. This is the design’s power and its softest point in one: the feed makes the synthetic possible, and every question about the product’s integrity is ultimately a question about the feed, its sources, its manipulation resistance, its behavior when the underlying halts, gaps, or, as with SPCX in its lockup-shadowed churn, moves violently on thin news.

Perp venues have run oracle machinery for crypto assets for years at scale; equities add wrinkles crypto never had, official closes, halts, corporate actions, and the young history of equity perps includes the learning curve those wrinkles imply.

The second is the funding rate, the elegant trick that replaces ownership. Because nothing forces a perp’s price toward the stock’s, the contract pays a periodic transfer between longs and shorts; whichever side is heavier pays the other, so deviation from the reference price becomes expensive and arbitrage pulls the peg tight.

The funding rate is also the product’s honest price tag: holding a leveraged equity view costs whatever the crowd on your side must pay, which in euphoric stretches, SPCX’s first week, say, made long exposure meaningfully expensive, a cost structure entirely unlike owning shares and closer to a rolling options position. Traders who read funding as information, crowding, sentiment, squeeze risk, get a signal equity markets deliver only obliquely.

The third is the venue itself. On Hyperliquid, order book, matching, and liquidations run on-chain, collateral is stablecoin, and the exchange’s economics, roughly $1.3 billion in annualized fees at about 70% of the on-chain perps market, fund the token model this publication has covered as crypto’s clearest value-accrual machine. Equity perps arrived through the venue’s expansion of builder-deployed markets, the mechanism opening listings beyond crypto pairs, and the roster now reaches into stocks, indices, and commodities.

The plumbing matters because it defines the counterparty question: an equity perp holder’s real exposures are the oracle, the liquidation engine, and the venue’s solvency, not any transfer agent or clearinghouse, and those exposures live, for most such venues, offshore and on-chain, exactly where the traditional system’s guarantees do not.

What it fixes, honestly The bull case for equity perps is not hype; it is a list of the equity market’s genuine rationing decisions, each of which the perp un-rations.

Time: stocks trade 32.5 hours a week; the news that moves them does not. The SPCX perp priced Starship’s failed test, the Cursor-acquisition backlash, and every lockup rumor in real time, weekends included, while shareholders waited for Monday.

For an asset class whose defining events, launches, in this case, literally happen at all hours, continuous price discovery is not a gimmick, and the perp’s around-the-clock tape has already become, for SpaceX watchers, the leading indicator the listed market opens to.

Access: a US brokerage account requires US residency, documentation, and, for anything beyond cash equities, suitability gates; the global majority is structurally excluded from the market that prices the world’s most important companies. A perp venue asks for a wallet.

Whatever one thinks of the compliance implications, and they are the final section’s subject, the distributional fact is real: equity perps are the first instrument through which a trader in Lagos or Karachi shorts an American IPO on the same terms as a fund in Connecticut.

Shorting: the equity market’s short path, locate the borrow, pay the fee, face the recall, buy-in risk, and, for a fresh IPO like SPCX with its 911.5 million share lockup, borrow scarcity that makes shorting practically institutional-only, is friction by design. The perp deletes all of it: shorting is symmetric with longing, no locate, no borrow, no recall, which is why the instrument’s clearest use case so far is exactly the whale trade this piece opened with, and why fresh IPOs, where the listed short is hardest, and opinion is hottest, are where equity perps found product-market fit first.

Our own coverage of SPCX’s descent noted the perp and the tokenized versions tracking the collapse in lockstep with the stock, a three-venue price war in which the crypto rails, not the exchange, offered the only practical retail short.

Leverage and capital efficiency complete the list; 10x on a stock position with stablecoin collateral is a different capital regime than Reg-T margin, and together the four fixes explain the product’s trajectory better than any narrative: equity perps grow wherever the traditional market’s rationing binds hardest.

What it is not, and where it cannot be placed The audit’s other half is shorter and sharper, because the perp’s limits are as structural as its fixes.

It is not equity. No dividend, no vote, no claim in bankruptcy, no share: the holder owns a cash-settled bet on a number, and the number’s connection to the company runs entirely through the oracle.

In calm markets the distinction is pedantic; in the scenarios that define instruments, a halt, a delisting, a corporate action, an oracle failure, a venue insolvency, it is everything, and the young product’s stress record is thin precisely where equities generate their worst stresses.

The tokenized-equity reckoning this publication audited after the SpaceX IPO, products scrapped, buyers refunded, late vintages underwater, is the adjacent cautionary tale: synthetic exposure to private and newly public equity is exactly where the gap between marketing and mechanism has already cost real money.

And it is not placeable, yet, on any regulatory map. A perpetual future on a security, offered without the security, settles into a jurisdictional void the American system has spent two years mapping everything except: the SEC governs securities and the platforms that touch them; the CFTC governs derivatives on commodities; the CLARITY framework, whose implementation this publication has covered in detail, allocates digital assets between them, and a synthetic stock position on an offshore chain answers to neither cleanly.

US platforms do not offer equity perps for precisely this reason; offshore and on-chain venues offer them to everyone else, and the enforcement perimeter, as with every offshore derivatives wave before, reaches the marketing, the fiat ramps, and the US-person access, not the protocol.

The honest forecast is the one the product’s own growth writes: volumes concentrating offshore, a widening data gap between the priced world and the regulated one, and eventually, once the instrument prices something systemic, a jurisdictional fight that will make the prediction-market war look tidy, because at least an event contract admits what it is. An equity perp is a security’s price without the security, the purest regulatory-arbitrage instrument crypto has produced, and the system it arbitrages has not yet noticed the size of the hole.

The venue underneath: why this happened on Hyperliquid The product’s story is inseparable from its venue, because equity perps did not emerge on a neutral substrate; they emerged on the one platform whose economics and architecture made them almost inevitable, and the causation teaches something about where crypto’s product frontier actually lives.

Hyperliquid’s qualifications are three. Liquidity first: at roughly 70% of on-chain perpetuals volume, with open interest and depth that dwarf its decentralized rivals, it is the only venue where a $14 million single-position equity short meets a book that can absorb it, and derivatives listings live or die on day-one depth.

Machinery second: a fully on-chain order book, matching engine, and liquidation system, hardened by years of crypto perps at scale, generalizes to any oracle-priced underlying, which is precisely what the builder-deployed markets mechanism formalized, opening the listing function beyond the core team and letting the equity roster grow at ecosystem speed rather than committee speed.

And incentives third: the venue’s fee engine, the roughly $1.3 billion annualized flow whose token mechanics this publication has covered as crypto’s most direct value-accrual machine, means every new asset class listed compounds the platform’s core loop, giving the ecosystem a structural hunger for exactly the kind of frontier products that traditional venues must clear through legal departments first. Where a regulated exchange asks whether it may list synthetic SpaceX, a permissionless listing mechanism asks only whether anyone will trade it, and the answer, June showed, was emphatic.

The concentration cuts both ways, and the audit owes the caveat. A product category living overwhelmingly on one venue inherits that venue’s specific risks: its oracle choices become the category’s oracle standard, its solvency becomes the category’s systemic question, and its governance, including the validator-set concentration questions that have followed the platform since launch, becomes the category’s political exposure.

Traditional equity infrastructure disperses these risks across exchanges, clearinghouses, and transfer agents by regulatory design; the equity-perp stack concentrates them by architectural choice, trading resilience for velocity. That trade has run in crypto’s favor for two years of calm-to-volatile markets. The scenario that would reprice it, a venue-level failure during an equity stress event, with synthetic positions on halted underlyings and no clearinghouse behind the book, is the category’s true tail, unpriced precisely because it is unprecedented, and anyone sizing positions in these instruments should price the venue before pricing the view.

What to watch The roster’s growth. Which equities get perps next, and how fast listings follow retail heat. The pattern so far, fresh IPOs and locked-up names where shorting is hardest, is the tell for where the product’s edge actually lies, and the first perp on a halted or delisted name will write the stress-test chapter early.

Funding rates as the new sentiment tape. SPCX perp funding, and its successors’, is becoming the cleanest continuous read on positioning in names the options market covers only during business hours. Expect equity desks to start quoting it, quietly, the way they came to watch crypto funding.

The basis triangle. Perp versus listed stock versus tokenized versions: three prices for one exposure, on three legal architectures. Divergences in stress are where the instruments’ true differences surface, and the first sustained break will teach the market which venue leads and which merely follows.

The first US regulatory contact. An enforcement action, a no-action letter, or a CLARITY-era rulemaking that names synthetic equity exposure would end the placement void. Until then, the product grows in the gap, and the gap is the story.

One historical rhyme completes the audit, because the market has seen this movie’s structure before. Contracts for difference, CFDs, ran the same play against the equity market two decades ago: synthetic exposure, high leverage, no ownership, offered offshore to retail the regulated market rationed out, and they grew into a permanent, regulated, and repeatedly scandal-scarred fixture of European and Asian trading, banned outright for US retail to this day.

Equity perps are CFDs rebuilt on crypto rails, with three genuine upgrades: transparent on-chain positioning instead of dealer books, funding rates set by market balance instead of broker discretion, and self-custodied collateral instead of client-money accounts, and one genuine downgrade: the absence of any regulatory perimeter at all, even the imperfect one CFDs eventually accepted.

https://x.com/cryptodotnews/status/2066521860502683882

The CFD precedent predicts the arc: rapid offshore growth, a defining blowup that forces structure, then bifurcation into regulated products where allowed and gray markets where not. It also predicts the endgame nobody in crypto says aloud: the traditional exchanges, watching a parallel equity market price their listings around the clock, will eventually either extend their own hours, list their own perpetual-style products, or buy the venues, because that is what incumbents do to successful arbitrage.

The instrument’s deepest significance may be exactly that pressure: equity perps are the market’s demonstration that the 32.5-hour trading week is a policy choice, not a law of nature, and demonstrations of that kind have a way of ending with the incumbents adopting what they could not suppress.

Frequently Asked Questions What is an equity perpetual future? A derivative that tracks a stock’s price without any share existing in the system: an oracle feeds the reference price, traders post stablecoin collateral for leveraged long or short exposure, and a periodic funding-rate payment between longs and shorts keeps the contract’s price pegged to the stock’s. It trades continuously, including when the underlying market is closed, and settles in cash, never in shares.

Why did SpaceX’s perp become the breakout example? Because it offered what the listed market could not. The SPCX contract traded through the IPO of the decade around the clock, tracked the stock from its $225.64 peak through its 48% collapse, and enabled short exposure, including a documented 10x, $14 million short paired with a 40x Bitcoin short, at a moment when the fresh IPO’s lockup made traditional borrowing scarce and practical shorting nearly impossible for retail.

What do equity perps genuinely improve on? Four rationing decisions of the equity market: hours, with 24/7 trading against a 32.5-hour week; access, with a wallet replacing residency-gated brokerage accounts for the global majority; shorting, with no locates, borrow fees, or recall risk; and capital efficiency, with high leverage on stablecoin collateral. The product grows wherever these constraints bind hardest, which is why new IPOs led adoption.

What does a holder of an equity perp actually own? A cash-settled position on a number, nothing more: no dividend, no vote, no bankruptcy claim, no share. The exposure’s integrity depends on the oracle’s accuracy, the venue’s liquidation engine, and the platform’s solvency, typically on offshore, on-chain infrastructure outside traditional investor protections. In halts, delistings, corporate actions, or oracle failures, the differences from equity ownership become decisive.

Who offers these products, and can US users trade them? On-chain derivatives venues, with Hyperliquid, at roughly 70% of decentralized perpetuals volume and about $1.3 billion in annualized fees, as the category leader through its builder-deployed markets. US platforms do not list equity perps because of their unresolved legal status, and offshore venues restrict US persons formally; practical access, as with every offshore derivatives generation, varies with enforcement of the perimeter.

How do funding rates work, and why do traders watch them? Whichever side of the contract is more crowded pays a periodic fee to the other, making deviation from the reference price costly and pulling the peg tight. The rate doubles as a sentiment gauge: expensive long funding signals crowded bullishness and squeeze risk, and because it prints continuously, it offers positioning information about a stock even while the listed market sleeps.

Where do equity perps sit legally? In a void. They are synthetic exposure to securities offered without securities, on infrastructure the SEC does not reach, in a derivative form the CFTC’s commodity jurisdiction does not clearly cover, and the CLARITY-era framework allocating digital assets between the agencies does not address them. That placement question, unresolved and growing with the product’s volumes, is the category’s defining regulatory story.

Should traders use them? That is an individual decision this article does not make. The honest framing: equity perps are powerful instruments whose advantages, hours, access, symmetric shorting, and leverage are real, and whose risks, oracle dependence, venue solvency, funding costs, legal ambiguity, and the absence of every traditional investor protection, are equally real and mostly unpriced until stress arrives. Position sizes that assume the venue is a brokerage misunderstand the instrument. This is educational analysis, not investment advice.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Derivatives trading with leverage carries substantial risk of loss; products described may be unavailable or restricted in your jurisdiction, and figures reflect data available at the time of writing. Nothing here is a recommendation to trade any instrument. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of July 24, 2026.

Key Takeaways Major institutional players including Multicoin Capital, Selini Capital, and Galaxy Digital have initiated withdrawals totaling approximately $150M in HYPE tokens The token experienced an 8% decline, touching $58 before finding support at $59.19 Pending withdrawals represent nearly 2x the token’s daily spot trading volume of $72.8M Selini Capital’s withdrawal appears connected to the termination of a HIP-3 perpetuals market operated by DreamCash Multicoin’s managing partner Tushar Jain publicly stated the unstaked tokens aren’t intended for immediate sale; withdrawal completion scheduled for July 28 The HYPE token from Hyperliquid experienced a sharp 8% correction from its recent peak this Wednesday following news that three prominent cryptocurrency investment funds have initiated withdrawal processes for approximately $150 million worth of tokens.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price The breakdown shows Multicoin Capital controlling $138.78 million in staked HYPE tokens, with approximately $116 million currently pending withdrawal from the staking protocol. Meanwhile, Selini Capital has queued $4.4 million and Galaxy Digital has initiated a $29.4 million HYPE withdrawal request.

On-chain tracking also revealed that a cryptocurrency wallet associated with Multicoin transferred approximately 167,000 HYPE tokens—valued around $11.2 million—to the Coinbase exchange. HYPE’s price momentarily dipped to $57.39 before stabilizing at $59.19, per CoinGecko data. The 24-hour trading activity exceeded $415 million.

Multicoin-linked wallet moves 490K $HYPE (~$29.48M) in 2 days

A wallet likely belonging to Multicoin Capital just moved 93K $HYPE (~$5.48M) to fresh wallets.

New addresses:
• 0xFA2173AD69De51769d75934AcBCF5C2382B1B7F1
• 0x257F1352204A01f59abC5bc60384Bf4c1e5f8B70

This follows… pic.twitter.com/InfWQIXYFF

— Onchain Lens (@OnchainLens) July 23, 2026

Massive Withdrawal Queue Creates Market Imbalance The sheer magnitude of the $150 million withdrawal request represents almost twice the daily spot market activity for HYPE. Data from Block Liquidity indicates that spot market volume reached only $72.8 million during approximately 28 hours preceding Wednesday’s movements. Market participants included 1,463 distinct buyers versus 982 sellers. Wintermute emerged as the dominant net buyer with purchases exceeding $9 million, while the top net seller disposed of $5.2 million worth of tokens.

Over the trailing seven-day period, HYPE has declined approximately 11%, marking it as the weakest performer within the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization during this timeframe. ETF monitoring platform CoinGlass registered zero inflows on Wednesday, following Tuesday’s $0.7 million outflow. The token’s Futures Open Interest currently stands at $2.5 billion, reflecting a modest 0.5% decrease over 24 hours.

Technical analyst CryptosBatman highlighted on X that HYPE has breached its 50-day moving average following a six-month sustained rally above this threshold. The analyst identified a developing bearish continuation pattern and projected a subsequent price target of $55, derived from the 1.618 Fibonacci extension level—a price point that coincides with an important support zone.

After a 6-month rally above the 50-day MA, $HYPE has broken down from it.

Not just a usual breakdown, but a bearish continuation has formed as well.

The next target based on the 1.618 Fibonacci extension is $55, right at a support level. pic.twitter.com/mhDl4htYSo

— BATMAN ⚡ (@CryptosBatman) July 23, 2026

Understanding the Institutional Exit Strategy Selini Capital’s withdrawal decision appears directly linked to the closure of DreamCash’s HIP-3 CASH perpetuals market. The protocol architecture requires market operators to stake 500,000 HYPE tokens as collateral, which gets returned upon market termination. Market intelligence suggests Selini Capital may liquidate its HYPE holdings through over-the-counter trading desks.

The rationale behind Multicoin’s substantial unstaking remains more ambiguous. The venture firm recently spearheaded a $1.75 million seed funding round for Trasia, an Asian-focused trading infrastructure planning to introduce perpetual contracts for Asian equity markets on the Hyperliquid platform. Managing partner Tushar Jain clarified on X that the unstaked HYPE tokens weren’t earmarked for immediate liquidation.

The critical July 28 unlock deadline will provide definitive answers regarding the ultimate destination of these substantial token positions.

Currently, HYPE trades beneath its 50-day exponential moving average positioned at $62.52. For bullish momentum to return, the token must recapture the $60.72 level and cross back above the 50-day EMA to improve near-term technical sentiment. The Relative Strength Index hovers around 40 while the MACD indicator persists below the zero line, both technical signals suggesting ongoing bearish pressure.

The 200-day EMA at $50.77 continues to hold as a critical long-term support threshold.

Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency market continue to feel the effects of the extensive liquidation cascade that occurred on October 10 last year. Market capitalization across the sector remains approximately 45% lower compared to the period leading up to that event. Amid this backdrop, decentralized derivatives platform Hyperliquid has seen its native token, HYPE, surge by about 34% during the same timeframe, exceeding the broader market’s performance. Hyperliquid’s total open interest recently reached $11.51 billion, marking its highest level this year since the October crash when Bitcoin was trading near $100,000.

Hyperliquid’s growth diverges from the marketAs Bitcoin trades around $65,000, new data from Coinglass indicates that aggregate open interest in crypto futures markets stands at $116.66 billion. This figure reflects a decrease of 47% from the October 10 benchmark. Despite the market’s ongoing recovery, Hyperliquid’s metrics show strong growth, suggesting the platform is carving out a larger role in a challenging environment for digital assets.

Hyperliquid operates as a decentralized perpetuals exchange, allowing users to trade derivative contracts without central intermediaries. Its recent performance contrasts with the more modest rebound observed among leading centralized exchanges (CEXs), highlighting a shift in trader activity toward decentralized alternatives.

Date/PeriodTotal Crypto Open InterestHyperliquid Open InterestBitcoin PriceOctober 2025 (pre-crash)$220.12 billion$15 billion~$100,000Current$116.66 billion$11.51 billion~$65,000RWA perpetuals surpass Bitcoin trading on HyperliquidReal-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts have emerged as the primary driver of increasing open interest on Hyperliquid. Daily open interest in RWA perps currently stands at $3.61 billion, achieved through the HIP-3 protocol introduced on October 13, 2025. HIP-3 allows users to stake 500,000 HYPE and launch a new perpetual market without direct approval from Hyperliquid’s core team.

With $3.61 billion in open interest, RWA perpetuals now represent the largest segment on Hyperliquid, overtaking Bitcoin, HYPE, and major layer-1 token markets. Daily trading volumes on HIP-3 products now account for half of total perpetual trading volume on the platform, compared to just 3% at the beginning of the year when core perpetuals made up 97% of activity.

Mini dictionary: Real-world asset (RWA) perpetuals are derivative contracts that enable continuous trading of assets linked to real-world items such as equities, commodities, or bonds on blockchain-based platforms. The HIP-3 framework allows for decentralized market deployment without centralized oversight, expanding the variety and accessibility of RWA-based derivatives.

Daily HIP-3 volumes now hold a 50% share of Hyperliquid’s total perpetual trading, while core perpetuals have seen their dominance drop from 97% to 50% within a few months.

Hyperliquid’s share of global perpetual open interest among major exchanges has risen to 9.5%, a new peak according to Hypeflows data. This is an increase from 6.9% recorded in late May. Despite this, Hyperliquid’s own open interest remains about 23% below its October 2025 high of nearly $15 billion. Meanwhile, competitors such as Binance, Bybit, and Gate.io have seen more pronounced declines due to post-crash deleveraging. Analysts interpret Hyperliquid’s rising market share as a result of weathering the downturn more successfully than its peers, rather than drawing substantial trader migration from these platforms.

ExchangeOpen Interest, CurrentChange Since Oct 2025Hyperliquid$11.51 billion-23%Binance(not specified)Larger contractionBybit(not specified)Larger contractionGate.io(not specified)Larger contractionHyperliquid’s all-time high market share has been attributed to shrinking less sharply than major centralized exchanges during market turbulence.

Concentration of open interest and CEX competitionThe majority of HIP-3 open interest—over 90%—is concentrated in TradeXYZ, a protocol launched by Hyperunit, Hyperliquid’s tokenization arm. HIP-3 market operations are conducted outside Hyperliquid’s core liquidity pool, meaning responsibilities such as data oracles, margin rules, and liquidity are managed by the venue operator. This setup has resulted in a single venue supporting roughly a third of Hyperliquid’s overall open interest.

Centralized exchanges are monitoring the trend. Binance responded by launching pre-IPO perpetual contracts featuring a SpaceX market on May 21, followed by seven US equity and ETF perpetuals offering up to 25x leverage as of July 9. The availability of RWA-based products with CEX-scale liquidity marks a shift that may alter the competitive landscape for Hyperliquid and DeFi derivatives markets.

Mini dictionary: TradeXYZ is a DeFi protocol built by Hyperunit, the tokenization arm of Hyperliquid, specializing in deploying and managing on-chain perpetual derivatives markets. The project enables decentralized trading of novel assets and was responsible for most HIP-3 open interest following the rollout of RWA markets.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

A significant leveraged position in HYPE, the native token of Hyperliquid, has drawn attention after the blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence identified a trader as the current holder of the largest on-chain HYPE long. Despite facing an unrealized loss of approximately $18 million, the trader has maintained the position, reflecting both the high-risk approach common in leveraged cryptocurrency trading and the expanding profile of altcoin derivatives markets.

Arkham highlights largest HYPE long positionArkham Intelligence, a company specializing in blockchain data analysis, reported that the on-chain trader known as “watershedpath” holds the biggest HYPE long position, valued at over $80 million. The account has endured an estimated $18 million paper loss over the past two weeks, as HYPE experienced a retreat from its recent price highs.

Despite these losses, Arkham stated that “watershedpath” has kept the position open, relying on a margin balance reportedly around $16 million to support the leveraged trade. This level of margin provides collateral, helping to prevent immediate liquidation as long as HYPE’s price does not drop to the estimated liquidation threshold.

Trader “watershedpath” holds the largest HYPE long on-chain right now, with a position worth over $80M, according to Arkham Intelligence. Liquidation may occur if the HYPE price declines by approximately $6 from current levels.

Arkham noted that reaching the liquidation threshold could lead to forced closure of the position, impacting both the trader and potentially the broader HYPE market.

Mini dictionary: Hyperliquid is a decentralized perpetual trading platform that allows users to trade crypto derivatives with leverage through an on-chain order book system, offering increased transparency compared to centralized exchanges.

TraderPosition ValueMargin RemainingUnrealized LossLiquidation Gapwatershedpath$80 million$16 million$18 million~$6 price dropImpact of large leveraged trades on HYPE marketLarge leveraged trades like this one are closely watched by market participants due to their potential to drive market volatility, especially if liquidation levels are approached. In leveraged positions, even small market moves can result in automatic liquidations, producing sharp increases in buying or selling activity and contributing to volatility across perpetual futures platforms.

The size of this HYPE position goes beyond a single trader, as forced liquidation might influence overall market liquidity and sentiment. If the position is triggered, it could also affect other leveraged holders, potentially setting off additional unwinding of positions. As long as the trader’s margin remains sufficient, the position can be sustained despite current losses.

Hyperliquid’s growth in decentralized derivativesHyperliquid has recently established itself among the fastest-growing decentralized exchanges for perpetual derivatives, utilizing an on-chain order book for trading. The platform emphasizes transparency, with large positions visible and trackable in real time by third-party analytics providers such as Arkham Intelligence.

This transparency offers traders insight into major market participants, making risk management a crucial consideration in such an environment.

Monitoring risk and liquidation levelsThe outcome of the largest HYPE leveraged position will depend largely on movement in HYPE’s price in the coming days. A recovery could allow the trader to reduce losses, while extended declines could trigger a liquidation if the margin buffer is depleted. This scenario underscores the need for close monitoring of leverage, margin requirements, and broader market factors when trading digital assets.

Investors remain attentive to significant leveraged positions as indicators of both conviction and risk in the rapidly evolving market for altcoin perpetual futures.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

American institutional investors have begun reallocating capital into spot XRP ETFs while actively taking profits in the DeFi segment. According to SoSoValue, daily net inflows into XRP funds reached $5.66 million, while Hyperliquid (HYPE) funds lost $698,040.

Wall Street's shift in priorities comes amid rapid progress in the U.S. Senate on the historic CLARITY Act. The bill, passed by the House of Representatives in July 2025, transfers oversight of digital commodities to the CFTC while leaving the SEC in control only of tokens classified as securities.

Why XRP is gaining traction ahead of the CLARITY ActOptimism surged after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the bill was on the "1-yard line" before approval. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and White House officials also confirmed progress in negotiations, easing disagreements over ethics provisions.

HOT Stories

A special Senate briefing will take place behind closed doors in the near future, with the goal of accelerating an official vote before lawmakers leave for recess. Despite opposition from Democrats, prediction markets now estimate the bill's chances of success at 50%–70%.

You Might Also Like

For investors, buying XRP ETFs is a beta bet on the American company Ripple, which develops payment solutions based on the XRP Ledger blockchain. Full legal clarity under the CLARITY Act would give the company's infrastructure more room to expand, including the scaling of its new RLUSD stablecoin.

In the long term, this ripple effect could sharply increase transaction activity across XRPL and trigger mass adoption of XRP by large businesses. Major capital is clearly moving into regulated assets ahead of the curve, restructuring portfolios around the future rules of the market.

Wall Street prefers policyYesterday's crypto ETF data clearly illustrates this trend. While Bitcoin continues to attract most of the capital, recording its sixth consecutive day of growth, and Ethereum steadily holds its position, a clear divide has emerged in the altcoin market.

XRP is attracting funds at roughly the same pace as Solana. However, while capital in Solana remains at high levels because of the network's strong performance in the real-world asset tokenization sector, the DeFi-focused Hyperliquid segment is losing ground.

Investors are actively withdrawing money from BlackRock's iShares HYPE fund. Capital flows into Bitwise's fund have completely stalled, while Grayscale recorded only a symbolic daily transaction.

Total US Spot XRP ETF net inflow over the last 30 days, Source: SoSoValueThis outflow continued a negative trend for Hyperliquid, whose ETFs already suffered substantial losses last week. The rest of the market is currently at a standstill: investors showed only minimal interest in Litecoin and Dogecoin, while capital flows into BNB, LINK, HBAR, AVAX, and DOT funds stopped completely.

An official date for the Senate vote has not yet been set, but fund data confirms that major U.S. buyers no longer want to play regulatory roulette and are already choosing assets tied to American jurisdiction.

Multicoin Capital appears to be locking in gains on its Hyperliquid ($HYPE) position, with on-chain data tracked by Lookonchain showing the firm moving a combined $36.5 million worth of tokens toward an exit.

The fund accumulated 606,091 HYPE at around $30 roughly five months ago. It has since deposited 395,570 HYPE, worth approximately $23.8 million, into Coinbase Prime, and separately requested to unstake a further 211,486 HYPE valued at close to $13 million. Based on current prices, the position carries an estimated unrealised profit of about $18.5 million.

A High-Conviction Position Now Being TrimmedThe move comes roughly a month after Multicoin published a detailed research report on Hyperliquid, in which it set a base-case price target of $319 for HYPE by 2028. The firm said it initiated a large position early in the year and had been accumulating since, with HYPE representing one of the largest positions in its liquid fund. To manage any conflict of interest, Multicoin adopted a three-day no-trade rule following the report's publication.

Hyperliquid is a vertically integrated Layer 1 blockchain and decentralised exchange built for high-speed trading, generating approximately $873 million in revenue across roughly $2.9 trillion in trading volume in 2025. Approximately 99% of protocol revenue is used to buy back HYPE, which is then effectively removed from circulating supply.

Deposit to Coinbase Prime Signals Potential SaleRouting tokens to Coinbase Prime is a common precursor to a structured institutional exit. On-chain data analysts note that Coinbase Prime deposits by institutional funds have historically tended to precede large structured OTC exits. The unstaking request for the remaining tokens suggests Multicoin may be preparing to liquidate the full position, though the firm has not made a public statement on its intentions.

HYPE reached an all-time high of $76.67 on June 16, 2026, and has since pulled back roughly 18% from that peak. At an average entry of around $30, Multicoin's position would still represent a substantial gain even at current levels.

The profit-taking activity stands in contrast to the firm's longer-term bullish thesis on the protocol, and may reflect routine portfolio management rather than a change in fundamental view.

Sources:
Multicoin Capital: Hyperliquid (HYPE) Analysis and Valuation
Crypto Briefing: Multicoin Capital predicts HYPE will reach $319 by 2028
CoinMarketCap: Hyperliquid (HYPE) price and market data

S&P Dow Jones Indices and Pantera Capital have launched the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index, a new crypto benchmark that excludes Bitcoin (BTC) entirely.

CEO Cathy Clay said Bitcoin fails the index’s core test, generating real protocol revenue instead of trading purely on speculation.

How the Index Weighs Its TokensThe index holds 18 constituents. Its five largest holdings are Ether (ETH), Binance Coin (BNB), Solana (SOL), Tron (TRX), and Hyperliquid (HYPE), a decentralized derivatives exchange.

The benchmark weights holdings by market capitalization and rebalances quarterly. No single token can exceed 35% of the total, and no other holding can top 20%. These caps mirror rules S&P applies to its own equity benchmarks.

Clay wants to bring stock-index discipline into digital assets. She favors protocols with verifiable economic activity over ones that trade on name recognition alone.

Pantera co-developed the methodology with founder Dan Morehead. The firm has managed over $3 billion across three investment strategies since launching its first crypto fund in 2013.

“S&P Dow Jones Indices helps investors cut through market noise with benchmarks you can trust.”
Clay, CEO of S&P Dow Jones Indices

Wall Street Warms to Altcoin SeasonThe exclusion highlights a widening split in how institutions define crypto value. By this measure, revenue beats Bitcoin’s dominant narrative as the market’s largest asset. Pantera’s history with institutional crypto access suggests more revenue-screened benchmarks could follow.

The launch lands as retail altcoin season signals stay unconfirmed but improving. CoinGlass’s Altcoin Season Index climbed to 58 in mid-July, building on a June 4 spike to 64. That reading sits above the neutral midpoint, but it remains short of the 75 threshold that confirms genuine rotation.

Institutional flows tell a parallel story. A March BeInCrypto Expert Council discussion found major allocators narrowing institutional crypto bets to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and a short list of DeFi names.

A revenue-screened benchmark like the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index offers portfolio managers a compliant route into that same thesis. It provides exposure to large-cap altcoins with real usage, skipping meme coins and speculative networks entirely.

If other index providers copy the approach, institutional capital could rotate into select altcoins early. That could happen well before retail-driven altcoin season data confirms a broader move.

Hyperliquid is positioning itself as the default liquidity layer for AI agents and algorithmic systems. The play is simple on the surface: offer a single, unified feed of funding rates, open interest, and cross-venue exposure, so agents can make sharper risk assessments without stitching together data from a dozen different sources.

The platform computes funding rates hourly, capped at 4% per hour, with a 0.01% interest component factored in every 8 hours. That level of granularity matters for algorithmic systems that need precise, time-stamped inputs to model carry costs and position risk.

Advertisement

The infrastructure upgrade that makes this practical is the introduction of agent wallets, sometimes called API wallets. These allow bots and AI systems to execute trades directly without requiring withdrawal permissions. A trading agent can operate on Hyperliquid with meaningful autonomy without holding the keys to the full treasury. Hyperliquid’s architecture is also optimized for sub-second transaction finality, which for high-frequency or reactive trading strategies is the difference between a profitable trade and a missed one.

Hyperliquid’s open interest crossed $10 billion by mid-2026. HIP-3 markets, which allow permissionless deployment of new trading pairs including tokenized assets and pre-IPO exposure products, recorded roughly $3.69 billion in volume during the same mid-2026 period. The platform also points to trillions in cumulative trading volume as evidence that liquidity depth is genuine rather than manufactured.

Senpi launched what it described as personal trading agents for Hyperliquid in February 2026, integrating a suite of 31 tools. Those agents come with persistent memory, meaning they retain context across trading sessions rather than starting from scratch each time.

For traders and investors watching this space, the concentration of open interest above $10 billion on a single venue introduces a specific kind of risk worth tracking. When automated systems cluster on one platform and share similar data inputs, their behavior during stress events can become correlated. A sharp move that triggers liquidations across multiple agent-managed positions simultaneously is not a theoretical scenario.

Agents with access to unified cross-venue exposure data can manage portfolio risk more holistically than traders watching fragmented dashboards. Funding rate arbitrage, delta-neutral hedging, and cross-market basis trades all become more tractable when the data infrastructure supports them cleanly.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Hyperliquid (@HyperliquidX) has unveiled HIP-4, a proposal to bring permissionless Outcome Markets to the protocol in a future network upgrade. The feature is set to launch on testnet first before any mainnet deployment.

How the Market Structure Works Under the proposal, anyone wishing to deploy a market must stake 500,000 $HYPE tokens. Slashing penalties apply for unclear market definitions or incorrect settlement, creating a financial incentive for deployers to maintain quality standards. Builders can deploy permissionless markets by staking HYPE, with slashable stakes burned if rules are violated. Validators will approve standardized templates, and deployers can earn up to a 50% share of trading fees generated by their markets.

HIP-4 introduces binary outcome contracts that settle to 0 or 1, allowing traders to speculate on events such as CPI releases or Bitcoin price levels without leverage or liquidations. Positions are fully collateralized in USDH, Hyperliquid's native stablecoin, and carry no liquidation risk. Unlike standalone prediction platforms, HIP-4 contracts operate inside the same account and execution engine as Hyperliquid's spot and perpetual futures markets, with YES and NO orders combined into a single shared order book.

A Strategic Bet on Prediction Markets Hyperliquid argues that prediction markets offer far more tradable events than spot or perpetual markets, making them a key long-term growth opportunity. The development was initiated in response to what the team described as "extensive user demand" for both prediction markets and options-style derivatives.

Traditional financial markets are largely dominated by products with non-linear payoffs, including options, CDS, and structured products. A huge portion of this market surface has so far been absent or barely represented in on-chain finance. HIP-4 is Hyperliquid's attempt to close that gap.

The rollout follows a phased approach. Phase 1 covers the testnet launch, Phase 2 brings mainnet deployment with a limited set of curated markets settled using objective data sources, and Phase 3 would open the infrastructure to permissionless deployment depending on the success of earlier phases.

Outcome markets require reliable settlement mechanisms, and the transition to permissionless deployment introduces questions about market quality and potential manipulation in thinly traded contracts. Builder curation in Phase 1 mitigates this, but Phase 2 will test the protocol's governance and oracle infrastructure.

Sources:
CoinDesk: Hyperliquid HIP-4 proposal adds outcome-based trading
OAK Research: What is HIP-4 and how do Hyperliquid outcome markets work?
Bitcoin.com News: Hyperliquid launches HIP-4 with zero-fee outcome markets

XRP recorded a sharp surge in open interest in the last few days, surpassing Hyperliquid’s HYPE token. The recent capital inflow into XRP from whales, spot ETFs, and derivatives traders has also kept prices stable. This indicates growing signs of institutional engagement in the XRP ecosystem.

XRP Futures Open Interest Surpasses HYPE According to CoinGlass data, XRP perpetual and futures open interest climbed significantly, reaching $2.60 billion as of July 20. A rise in open interest signals derivatives traders’ growing conviction and capital flow in XRP.

Derivatives market data showed massive buying in past 24 hours. The total XRP futures open interest jumped more than 10% to $2.60 billion. Futures OI across crypto exchanges climbed in the past 4 hours.

The crypto asset has surpassed HYPE to become the fourth largest in terms of total open interest. HYPE futures open interest dropped more than 2.50% to $2.57 billion in past 24 hours.

Total XRP Futures Open Interest. Source: Coinglass HYPE, the native token of the Hyperliquid, previously overtaken XRP in futures open interest earlier. HYPE open interest skyrocketed above $3 billion after Kalshi launched CFTC-regulated HYPE perpetuals.

Traders looking to take advantage of these volatile open interest swings can compare the best crypto futures trading platforms to evaluate margin rules, funding rates, and available leverage.

Rising Demand Among Institutions Fuels Momentum The major catalysts behind the recent growing institutional appetite for XRP include Ripple’s partnerships with many tradfi and crypto native firms, inflows into spot ETFs, and demand from derivatives amid low funding rates.

Jack McDonald, SVP Stablecoins at Ripple, told Grayscale about the company Ripple’s institutional strategy, and RWA adoption of RLUSD and XRP. Ripple has partnered with Ondo Finance, Mastercard, JPMorgan, and OKX to build the future of finance.

Ripple is partnering with @Mastercard, @jpmorgan, @okx, and @OndoFinance to build the future of finance for both traditional and digital assets.@_JackMcDonald_ joins Grayscale to discuss @Ripple's institutional strategy, real-world adoption of $RLUSD and $XRP, and what's next. pic.twitter.com/e98EgpiiJk

— Grayscale (@Grayscale) July 19, 2026

Moreover, spot ETFs recorded renewed inflows amid capital inflows into the crypto market. Cumulative net inflows and AUM have reached $1.49 billion and nearly $1 billion. Whereas HYPE ETF total assets under management reached $301.34 million, with significant outflows last week.

As CoinGape reported earlier, whales accumulated 70 million XRP in a week as US inflation cooled. The massive whale accumulation sent XRP price higher, alongside a notable surge in futures open interest.

Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives trading protocol, is seeing increased trading activity as its native token HYPE maintains a solid support level and network growth signals further potential. Recent data shows buyers are defending key price zones, while rising protocol fees highlight strengthening user engagement on the platform.

Price action and key support levelsHYPE is currently priced at $61.01, with a 24-hour trading volume of $235.1 million and a market capitalization of $15.43 billion. Over the previous 24 hours, the token gained 2.41%, which positions it for a possible bullish reversal. Market observers note the importance of HYPE holding above its main support, as sustained buying interest keeps the positive market structure intact despite recent consolidation.

According to Bitcoin Meraklisi, a well-followed cryptocurrency analyst, the critical $58 support serves as a crucial threshold for further bullish momentum. Holding this level is essential for the asset to pursue higher prices. If the price closes above the $74 resistance on higher timeframes, a bullish cup pattern could form, potentially pushing HYPE toward the $172 target. Failure to hold $58, however, may weaken the overall outlook and open the way for corrections.

Bitcoin Meraklisi emphasizes the significance of the $58 support, indicating that if HYPE remains above this level, there is room for a sustained upward move, while breaching it would likely lead to a loss of momentum.

Hyperliquid fee revenue surgesHyperliquid’s network has seen its daily protocol fee collection surge to $1.9 million, according to data compiled by blockchain research firm NSB Intel. This new milestone places Hyperliquid in sixth place among protocols that generate the highest daily fee revenue, surpassing competitors such as Canton in the process.

This surge in fee accrual is widely viewed as a positive sign for the protocol, pointing to greater user adoption and a notable increase in trading volumes on the platform.

Mini dictionary: Hyperliquid is a decentralized perpetual futures protocol that allows on-chain trading of cryptocurrency derivatives without the involvement of centralized intermediaries. The protocol’s growth is measured in part by fee revenue and user activity metrics.

ProtocolDaily Fee RevenueRankingHyperliquid$1.9 million6thCantonBelow $1.9 millionBelow 6thMarket sentiment and future outlookStronger trading volumes and higher protocol fee revenue have fueled optimism for HYPE’s continued growth. As bullish sentiment returns to the wider crypto market, reflected in upward movement in BTC, Hyperliquid investors are increasingly confident in the platform’s competitive position.

Technical analysts observe that, provided HYPE maintains critical support levels, the asset could test and potentially break above significant resistance barriers. If momentum holds, this move may accelerate gains and reinforce the token’s position within the decentralized finance landscape.

However, should HYPE lose its main support, analysts caution that the asset could see increased selling pressure and a price correction. Sustained network activity and fee generation remain important indicators for investor confidence and future price action.

Continued expansion in both trading activity and protocol revenue reflects the growing role of Hyperliquid in the decentralized finance sector, underscoring its strengthening market position relative to other DeFi platforms.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE falls 12% over the past 24 hours amid massive profit-taking. On-chain data revealed that a wallet linked to venture capital giant a16z has started selling a major portion of its holdings.

a16z Wallet Sells 437K Hyperliquid Tokens amid Massive Profit Booking An a16z-linked wallet known for massive accumulation of HYPE has started selling its holdings, Lookonchain reported on July 17. The wallet has deposited almost 437,000 HYPE tokens, valued at around $28.38 million.

Over the past 2 days, the wallet has dumped its HYPE holdings into Hyperliquid, OKX, Bybit, and Gate crypto exchanges. The selling coincided with massive profit-taking suffered by Hyperliquid.

Spot On Chain revealed another suspected a16z wallet moved $30.57 million to crypto exchanges. The two wallets have dumped $59 million in HYPE over the last 24 hours.

Coinglass data showed $19 million in HYPE long positions liquidated over the past 24 hours. This comes amid broader selling pressure in the crypto market due to new US strikes on Iran and crypto options expiry today.

The crypto market saw nearly $400 million in liquidations over the past 24 hours. Over 100K traders are liquidated, with the largest single liquidation order of ETHUSDT worth $6.24 million on Binance.

To avoid sudden margin wipes during volatile market events, it is essential to use risk-management tools on the best crypto leverage trading platforms available today.

HYPE Price Crashes 12% HYPE price fell almost 12% in the past 24 hours, with the price currently trading at $59.46. The 24-hour low and high are $58.51 and $66.07, respectively. Furthermore, the trading volume has increased by 40% over the last 24 hours, as traders join Hyperliquid profit booking .

Meanwhile, Robinhood Chain overtook Hyperliquid in 24-hour decentralized exchange (DEX) volume, with more than $606 million. Robinhood Chain has recorded massive demand amid RWA, DeFi, and CASHCAT buzz. In the last 7 days, the new chain recorded $5.29 billion in DEX volume, while Hyperliquid saw $1.48 billion in volume.

Ched Trading noted profit-booking in Hyperliquid after it fell below the EMA-8 on the weekly chart. The price could fall further towards $55 if it fails to hold.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Price in Weekly Timeframe. Source: Cheds Trading Derivatives markets record massive selling, as per CoinGlass data. The total HYPE futures open interest fell more than 8% to $2.55 billion in the last 24 hours. HYPE futures OI on Binance tumbled 13% and 12% on Bybit, signaling bearish sentiment among derivatives traders.

Multicoin Capital has invested in Trasia Labs, the team behind an Asia-focused perpetual futures trading platform built on Hyperliquid, marking the venture firm's first investment in the Hyperliquid ecosystem, a Multicoin spokesperson told The Block.

The investment comes shortly after Multicoin disclosed an investment in the Hyperliquid token itself late last month, when it published a detailed investment thesis on the protocol. At the time, Multicoin said it initiated a large HYPE position early this year and has been accumulating since, with HYPE now representing one of the largest positions in its liquid fund.

As for Trasia, Multicoin has invested $1.75 million in the startup as the sole investor in its seed round, Trasia co-founder Mable Jiang told The Block.

Jiang is a former Multicoin Capital partner and most recently served as chief revenue officer at Find Satoshi Lab (FSL), the web3 development studio behind the move-to-earn app Stepn. Jiang said she left FSL in May 2025 and co-founded Trasia this May with Edison Chen, who has been building in web3 since 2017.

Trasia began fundraising in May and closed the round last month, Jiang said, declining to disclose the structure of the round, the valuation or whether Multicoin received a board or observer seat.

Jiang said Trasia intentionally raised only a small amount of outside capital because the team wants to first launch its products and demonstrate traction before raising additional funding. She added that more than $35 million in HYPE and USDC has been "committed" to launching Trasia's HIP-3 Asian equity perpetuals market. Asked whether that amount would primarily be used as liquidity, Jiang said it would support "various purposes."

HIP-3, or Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3, allows developers to create their own decentralized perpetual futures exchanges on top of Hyperliquid's infrastructure by posting a 500,000 HYPE staking bond. The largest HIP-3 application by trading volume today is Trade.xyz.

How Trasia plans to stand out Like Trade.xyz, Trasia is building a Hyperliquid-based perpetual futures platform, but with a focus on Asian traders. Trasia has launched its web trading interface in Chinese and English, with a native mobile app planned for August. Trasia is also set to launch Asia Points, an invite-only trading rewards program for early users.

Trasia initially offers Hyperliquid's native perpetual markets before introducing its own later this year. Jiang said the platform has not yet decided which contracts it will launch first because market conditions can change quickly. The initial focus will be on companies involved in AI infrastructure, particularly those approaching public listings or already attracting strong investor interest across Asia.

When asked how Trasia differs from Hyperliquid and other HIP-3 platforms such as Trade.xyz, Jiang said the platform can reach users who are not already trading on Hyperliquid or Trade.xyz.

"If all of our trading flow today came from the same pool as Trade.xyz's — the same group of traders — then we'd have no chance whatsoever," Jiang said. "The real moat is the unique users you can reach and own."

Jiang said Trasia is targeting users who have never heard of Hyperliquid or Trade.xyz and, in many cases, are not yet familiar with onchain trading. She said the platform plans to reach those users through a mobile-first experience, regional distribution channels and its local network. "We also have team members who have strong regional connections," she added.

Trasia currently has a team of 10 people based primarily across Hong Kong, Taiwan and Tokyo, Jiang said.

"We are long the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and we expect Trasia to gain meaningful market share quickly and become a dominant force in the years to come," said Tushar Jain, managing partner and CIO at Multicoin Capital.

The Funding newsletter:  Stay on top of crypto venture capital, M&A, and the broader institutional crypto market with my free newsletter, The Funding, featuring original reporting and analysis every two weeks. Sign up here!

Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Ethereum price today: $1,870Ethereum has outperformed crypto majors Bitcoin, XRP, SOL and HYPE following a market boost from cooling inflation reports.The Robinhood Chain launch, ETH ETF inflows, BitMine's accumulation and Clarity Act discussions are spurring the outperformance.ETH saw a rejection at the 100-day EMA after rising 10% over the past week.Ethereum (ETH) has outperformed the top 10 cryptocurrencies since the crypto market began a recovery last week. On a weekly timeframe, the top altcoin is seeing an 8% gain, compared to 2.4%, 1.4%, 1.6%, -1.8% and -3.5% for Bitcoin (BTC), BNB, XRP, Solana (SOL) and Hyperliquid (HYPE).

While cooling inflation reports and declining energy prices were primarily responsible for the recent broad rally across the crypto market, ETH's outperformance stems from several other key factors.

ETH vs Top Cryptos. Source: CoinGeckoWhy Ethereum is outperforming other top cryptosThe Robinhood Chain, launched on July 1 as an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2), has been spurring demand for native ETH. The amount of ETH bridged from the L1 to the L2 chain has surpassed $164 million, a 10x increase in the past week, according to onchain analytics platform Token Terminal.

"If adoption continues, the chain could become a meaningful new source of demand for Ethereum," the platform stated in a Thursday X post.

The chain has seen strong demand over the past week, attracting token launchpads and memecoin activity. In 2024, Solana saw a similar upsurge in memecoin activity before going on a run that outperformed major cryptocurrencies.

Beyond that, Ethereum is also attracting institutional capital again, with $96 million in net inflows over the past three days. Last week, US spot ETH ETFs ended an eight-week outflow streak after recording $84.4 million in net inflows, per SoSoValue data. Since the beginning of the month, the products have only seen two outflow days, while XRP and Solana products are struggling to attract capital.

Similarly, US spot BTC ETFs have posted four outflow days so far in July and are on track to end the week on negative flows.

In addition, Ethereum treasury firm BitMine Immersion has remained a consistent source of demand for the top altcoin, accumulating roughly 70,000 ETH in the past two weeks.

Strategy, on the other hand, which has been a major demand driver for Bitcoin, flipped to distribution over the past two weeks after it sold $216 million worth of BTC. The firm also failed to log any buying activity last week.

Increased discussion and positive sentiment around the Clarity Act are also filtering into Ethereum, as it hosts the majority of onchain activity. The L1 is the largest chain by total value locked (TVL) and tokenized assets, with $40.9 billion and $14.8 billion, respectively, according to DefiLlama data.

Despite several positive developments surrounding ETH currently, the broader crypto market recovery remains fragile amid resumed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Bitfinex analysts also noted that ETH ETF inflows are not yet strong enough to drive prices.

"The $96 million total sits against a market capitalization above $220 billion, which makes it a rounding error even allowing for the illiquid spot market. A bid concentrated in one issuer remains too narrow to call a regime," the analyst wrote in a Thursday market commentary.

"Whether Ether ETFs continue to draw buyer interest remains to be seen; they have struggled to do so across nearly two years since launch."

Bitfinex added that sustained improvements in onchain activity are a "stronger catalyst" for an L1 like Ethereum.

Ethereum Price Forecast: ETH fails to reclaim 100-day EMA despite 10% jumpOn the daily chart, ETH/USDT trades at $1,874, maintaining a constructive bullish bias as price remains above the 20- and 50-day Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs) at $1,780 and $1,810, respectively. The altcoin remains capped by the longer-term 100-day EMA at $1,948 after a 10% rise over the past week, suggesting room for further upside only if this barrier is reclaimed.

Momentum stays supportive, with the 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) around 60 and the Stochastic hovering in the low 70s, hinting at a cooldown after a strong rally.

On the topside, immediate resistance is located at the horizontal level of $1,909, followed by $2,018 and $2,107, where prior supply converges. Above these, additional resistance is seen at $2,211 and then $2,388.

ETH/USDT daily chartOn the downside, initial support emerges at $1,806, ahead of the nearby dynamic floors offered by the 50- and 20-day EMAs. Below these, more substantial demand is seen at $1,741, with deeper supports at $1,524, $1,404 and $1,155 in the event of a broader corrective slide.

(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool. Know more.)

Hyperion DeFi, the NASDAQ-listed company trading under HYPD, is putting 500,000 staked HYPE tokens to work. The tokens are being deployed to Skew Technologies through a HYPE Asset Use Service (HAUS) agreement, giving Skew the economic backing it needs to launch perpetual futures markets on Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 permissionless infrastructure.

In return, Hyperion gets equity ownership in Skew plus a cut of the revenues generated from listing services. The revenue share has both fixed and scaling components, meaning Hyperion earns a baseline regardless of how much volume Skew’s new markets attract, while also participating in the upside if trading activity takes off.

How the deal actually works HIP-3, which went live on October 13, 2025, requires anyone deploying a new market to maintain 500,000 staked HYPE as what’s called “alignment capital.” That’s a meaningful barrier to entry, designed to ensure deployers have real skin in the game and face slashing risks if they misbehave.

Advertisement

Through the HAUS agreement, effective July 15, 2026, Hyperion essentially lends its staked position to Skew, which can then spin up new HIP-3 perpetual futures markets without needing to source and lock up half a million HYPE tokens on its own.

Skew’s initial focus will be on perpetual futures through HIP-3, with plans to eventually expand into outcome-based markets under HIP-4 once the core perps business reaches operational stability.

Why Hyperion is betting big on infrastructure Hyperion DeFi holds the distinction of being the first US publicly listed company built around the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Hyperion CEO Hyunsu Jung has pointed to growing global demand for HIP-3 launches as a key driver behind the company’s HAUS strategy.

This isn’t Hyperion’s first HAUS agreement. The company previously partnered with Felix Foundation in late 2025 under a similar arrangement. Recent reports also indicate Hyperion has been unwinding some of its other HYPE deployment deals.

What Skew brings to the table Skew Technologies is founded by a team with experience in financial markets and institutional trading. David Gil, Skew’s founder, has framed this partnership as a foundation for innovative institutional trading products, suggesting the company sees HIP-3 as a launchpad rather than an endpoint.

What this means for investors For Hyperion shareholders, each HAUS agreement transforms staked tokens into equity positions and revenue streams. The fixed component of the revenue share provides downside protection, while the scaling component offers leverage to trading volume growth.

The risk side of the equation centers on slashing. HIP-3’s alignment capital is actively at risk. If a market operator behaves badly or a technical failure triggers slashing conditions, Hyperion could lose a substantial portion of its deployed capital.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Prediction markets are crypto’s quiet killer app. Polymarket proved that during the 2024 US election cycle. Now Hyperliquid wants a piece of the action, and Outcome.xyz is the team trying to blow the doors open.

The push is simple: let anyone deploy a prediction market on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure without needing permission from validators or anyone else. It hasn’t happened yet. And the community is making noise about it.

What HIP-4 built, and what it’s missing Hyperliquid launched its HIP-4 outcome markets on mainnet back on May 2. These are binary contracts that settle to either 0 or 1, essentially yes-or-no bets baked directly into Hyperliquid’s core trading engine, HyperCore. Shared order books, shared margining, shared data feeds.

Outcome.xyz was the team that deployed the first wave of these markets. They started with recurring daily BTC price binaries, the kind of straightforward contract that lets you stress-test plumbing without getting too creative. Early trading volumes hit several million dollars in notional value on the first days alone.

But here’s the thing: every single market that exists right now had to go through Hyperliquid’s validators. There’s no self-serve option. As of mid-July, permissionless deployment still hasn’t gone live.

Advertisement

Why permissionless matters Hyperliquid’s current model relies on validators to both approve and settle markets. Instead of trusting some external oracle service to report outcomes, Hyperliquid’s own validator set handles settlement. It reduces a major attack surface that has plagued prediction markets for years.

But validator gating for market creation means the menu of available markets is limited to whatever gets approved through that process. Community feedback on July 14 made the frustration clear, with calls for permissionless rollout “asap.”

Outcome.xyz appears to be the team most actively pushing this forward. As the primary frontend developer for HIP-4 markets, they have both the technical proximity and the incentive to see the gates come down.

The competitive chess match Hyperliquid isn’t entering an empty room. Polymarket remains the dominant on-chain prediction platform, and Kalshi has carved out a regulated niche in the US market. Both have significant head starts in liquidity, user base, and market variety.

What Hyperliquid brings to the table is integration. Hyperliquid’s pitch is that prediction markets live inside the same trading engine as perpetuals, spot markets, and everything else on the platform. A trader doesn’t need to move capital to a separate protocol to place a prediction bet. If you’re already running a strategy on Hyperliquid’s perpetuals, you can allocate margin to prediction markets without fragmenting your capital across platforms.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup represents exactly the kind of global event that drives massive prediction market volume, and a permissionless rollout before or during the event could serve as a significant catalyst for adoption.

Volumes on HIP-4 markets remain modest compared to dedicated prediction platforms. Several million dollars on launch days is encouraging infrastructure validation, not market dominance.

What investors should watch The permissionless deployment timeline is the single most important variable here. Until third-party builders can create markets freely, HIP-4 remains a proof of concept rather than a competitive product.

The validator-as-oracle settlement model eliminates oracle risk, which is a real problem that has caused costly misresolutions on other platforms. But it also means every market outcome depends on validator consensus, and as market variety expands into subjective or ambiguous territory, that consensus mechanism will be tested in ways that simple BTC price binaries never will.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Jul 14, 2026, 2:57 p.m.

2 min read

Jeremy Allaire Circle CEO. (The Washington Post / Getty Images) Summary

JPMorgan said a new arrangement with Hyperliquid is a near-term revenue headwind for Circle and Coinbase, with a greater long-term threat to Circle's USDC economics. The bank argued the deal exposes a "prisoner's dilemma," encouraging Circle and Coinbase to compete for USDC distribution at the expense of each other's economics. The Wall Street firm lowered earnings estimates for both firms, citing the Hyperliquid changes alongside weaker crypto trading volumes and asset prices.JPMorgan (JPM) lowered its forecasts for Circle Internet (CRCL) and Coinbase (COIN), saying their revamped agreement with Hyperliquid weakens the economics of Circle's USDC and posed a bigger long-term threat to the stablecoin issuer.

The bank said the deal created a "prisoner's dilemma," incentivizing stablecoin issuer Circle and crypto exchange Coinbase to compete for distribution of the dollar-pegged token at the expense of each other's economics.

Hyperliquid, now one of the largest crypto trading venues, holds about $6 billion of USDC, or roughly 8% of the circulating supply, JPMorgan estimated.

"We think the change in the Hyperliquid relationship showcases the challenge for Circle and Coinbase partnership agreements because it can create 'a prisoner’s dilemma' that drive Coinbase and Circle to compete with each other when promoting USDC distribution," analysts led by Kenneth Worthington said in the Tuesday report.

Hyperliquid is one of crypto's fastest-growing trading venues and the leading decentralized perpetual futures exchange. The platform processed more than $150 billion in trading volume in July alone, while its volume relative to Binance climbed to 11.5%, underscoring its growing share of the derivatives market. USDC balances on Hyperliquid have swelled to roughly $6 billion, making it an increasingly important distribution channel for the stablecoin.

Under the new arrangement, Coinbase will classify USDC on Hyperliquid as "on-platform," collecting the income generated by reserves and paying 90% of it to Hyperliquid. JPMorgan estimated Coinbase previously split nearly all of the revenue evenly with Circle.

The bank cut earnings estimates for both companies, citing the Hyperliquid agreement and weaker crypto markets, though it expects higher interest rates to provide some support for USDC-related revenue over the longer term.

USDC has also lost momentum in recent months. Its circulating supply has fallen to about $73 billion from nearly $80 billion in March, part of a broader $10 billion contraction in the stablecoin market since May as crypto trading activity cooled and new regulated rivals chipped away at the dominance of USDC and Tether's USDT.

Japanese investment bank Mizuho said in a report last week that Circle's final approval from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to establish First National Digital Currency Bank is a positive milestone, but investors may be overestimating its significance.

AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

12345678910

https://99bitcoins.com/cryptocurrency/hyperliquid-review/

Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 markets have experienced a significant increase in perpetual futures market volume, now accounting for nearly 50% of the protocol’s total perp volume. This marks a substantial rise from roughly 2% at the beginning of 2026. The surge is primarily driven by the onchain activity in real-world assets, including tokenized U.S. equities and commodities. With 23 of the top 30 Hyperliquid pairs by open interest, the growth reflects a shift towards 24/7 access to traditional assets, especially during periods of geopolitical volatility when legacy markets are closed. Market participants are increasingly favoring HIP-3’s framework for its ability to offer continuous exposure to these assets.

Advertisement

Key Takeaways The increase in HIP-3’s market share appears consistent with growing interest in onchain access to tokenized real-world assets. Hyperliquid’s recent performance suggests market participants are rotating from altcoins to tokenized stocks and commodities. The rise in onchain stock activity may indicate a longer-term trend toward integrating traditional financial assets into blockchain ecosystems. What to Watch The market will be closely monitoring if Hyperliquid can sustain or further increase its market share in perpetual futures. Key indicators include announcements of partnerships or technological advancements that could enhance Hyperliquid’s offerings. Additionally, developments in geopolitical events or regulatory changes impacting real-world asset tokenization could significantly influence market sentiment and pricing, potentially affecting Hyperliquid’s trajectory towards its $100 price target by the end of 2026.

Get live prediction-market analysis, powered by Vera. Sign up for Vera.

Term Structure

Contract Odds Δ since publish Volume 24h December 31 39% — — View market → January 1 2027 5.4% — — View market → January 1 2027 4% — — View market → January 1 2027 68.5% — — View market → January 1 2027 9.2% — — View market → January 1 2027 4.5% — — View market →

Hyperliquid announces the launch of contract trading for the meme coin CASHCAT on Robinhood Chain, with support for up to 3x leverage.

Relevant content

A whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens on Hyperliquid.

According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a whale deposited approximately $450,000 into Hyperliquid. Within one hour of CASHCAT’s listing on Hyperliquid, the whale shorted 1.11 million CASHCAT tokens with 3x leverage, valued at $222,200. The entry price was $0.195336, liquidation price $0.531304, resulting in an unrealized loss of $4,400.

11 minutes ago

CASHCAT's market capitalization briefly surpassed $200 million, surging over 22% intraday.

Per GMGN market data, CASHCAT, a meme coin on Robinhood Chain, briefly hit an all-time high in market capitalization, currently trading at $200 million with an intraday increase of over 20%. Meme coins are highly volatile, so investors should exercise caution regarding associated risks.

11 minutes ago

The White House confirms Trump has 'emptied' the U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

The White House confirmed on the 10th that U.S. President Donald Trump has removed two incumbent members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission from their posts. In a statement sent to media on the same day, the White House said the president "reserves the right to remove relevant personnel who may not be fully committed to safeguarding U.S. election security and ensuring every legal vote is counted." The statement did not give a specific reason for Trump's move. However, U.S. media reported that the Election Assistance Commission had rejected an executive order signed by Trump, which required voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship on the national voter registration form. (Xinhua News Agency)

11 minutes ago

A crypto whale shorted Ethereum (ETH) with 25x leverage, holding a position worth $12.43 million.

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited approximately $500,000 into Hyperliquid to open a short position of 6,914 ETH (valued at $12.43 million) with 25x leverage. The entry price was $1,790.36, liquidation price stands at $1,825.58. The position currently has an unrealized loss of around $50,700, with only a 1.55% gap to liquidation.

11 minutes ago

A trader has earned more than $1 million in profits on CASHCAT, achieving a staggering return of up to 1183 times.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, a trader has reaped over $1 million in profits from CASHCAT. The trader spent 0.49 ETH (valued at $838) to purchase 15.04 million CASHCAT tokens, then sold them for 580 ETH (worth $1.04 million), generating a profit of over $1 million (a 1183x return). Had the trader held the tokens until now, the profit would have reached $2.9 million.

11 minutes ago

A crypto whale bought the dip, acquiring 14,007 ETH valued at approximately $25.18 million.

According to monitoring by OnchainLens, a whale purchased 14,007 ETH at an average price of $1,798, with a total value of approximately $25.1 million.

11 minutes ago

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the man who built the world’s largest crypto exchange and then went to prison for its compliance failures, has some thoughts about Hyperliquid. Speaking on the Galaxy Brains podcast on June 10, CZ called Hyperliquid’s high-performance Layer-1 blockchain and no-KYC perpetual futures trading model “awesome.” In the same breath, he made it clear he would never touch that approach himself. “I would never do what they do,” he said, pointing to the very personal consequences he faced when Binance’s own compliance infrastructure fell short.

Binance was hit with a $4.3 billion fine in 2023 for KYC and anti-money laundering violations. CZ personally served a four-month prison sentence as part of the settlement. He acknowledged that Binance, as a centralized exchange with identifiable leadership and corporate structure, simply cannot operate the way Hyperliquid does. Hyperliquid, by contrast, positions itself as a decentralized protocol, which at least theoretically puts it in a different regulatory category.

Advertisement

Inside Hyperliquid’s model Hyperliquid launched its Layer-1 blockchain in 2023 and has since grown into one of the most active decentralized trading venues in crypto. Users connect their wallets and start trading perpetual futures instantly. No identity verification, no waiting period, no compliance friction. By 2025, it was handling hundreds of billions monthly in transaction volume.

Hyperliquid’s decentralization claims deserve some scrutiny. The network runs on just 24 validators. The Hyper Foundation controls approximately 60% of the governance stake. CZ himself pointed to this dynamic, noting that Hyperliquid is controlled by a small team. If regulators ever decide to come after the platform, that concentrated control structure could make it easier to identify responsible parties than a truly distributed protocol would.

HYPE token rides the wave The HYPE token, native to the Hyperliquid ecosystem, is trading near its all-time high around $76 to $77, with a market capitalization exceeding $15 billion. CZ’s remarks appear to have contributed to renewed enthusiasm around the token. The price surge came without any immediate regulatory repercussions.

What this means for investors The investment case for HYPE comes down to a single bet: can a no-KYC trading platform continue operating at scale without facing the kind of enforcement action that nearly destroyed Binance? Hyperliquid’s concentrated governance structure, with 24 validators and a foundation controlling roughly 60% of stake, means there are identifiable entities that regulators could target. A protocol where a single foundation holds supermajority governance power is, functionally, more like a company than a truly decentralized network, meaning decision-making could change rapidly and tokenomics could be altered based on the preferences of a small group.

Investors should watch for two signals above all else. First, any regulatory action or formal investigation targeting Hyperliquid or similar no-KYC platforms, particularly from US authorities, would immediately reprice the risk. Second, any moves by the Hyper Foundation to distribute governance stake more broadly would strengthen the decentralization argument and potentially reduce regulatory exposure.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Phantom Technologies and the Hyperliquid Policy Center filed a joint comment with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission asking the agency to update its rules for onchain market infrastructure.

The comment responds to the CFTC’s request for information on regulations that may limit fintech firms from partnering with financial infrastructure and intermediaries regulated by the Commission.

Phantom and HPC said current rules generally assume a custodial market structure where intermediaries handle customer orders and funds, while onchain markets can allow users to trade directly and retain control of their assets.

Advertisement

The groups asked the CFTC to confirm that developing or contributing to onchain protocol software does not, by itself, trigger registration with the Commission. They said registration should apply to firms that actually handle customer orders or funds, or enter into transactions with customers, rather than to software protocols or developers standing alone.

Phantom and HPC also asked the CFTC to give registered exchanges, clearing organizations and intermediaries a path to use onchain infrastructure for regulated functions.

The comment said designated contract markets should be able to use onchain protocols for matching and execution, while derivatives clearing organizations should be able to use them for margining, settlement, clearing and default management.

The filing also calls on the CFTC to turn its recent Phantom no action letter into a formal rule. That letter granted relief to Phantom as a non custodial wallet provider whose role is limited to providing technical access to regulated markets. Phantom and HPC said a rulemaking would give similar wallet and front end providers broader certainty.

Phantom said it does not hold user funds, control private keys, execute trades between users or intermediate transactions. HPC described itself as an advocacy group focused on creating a regulated path for Americans to access onchain markets, including those available on Hyperliquid.

Phantom integrates Hyperliquid through its interface, though the functionality is not available to US users. The groups said they are working together to support regulations that would allow Americans to access onchain derivatives markets under CFTC oversight.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Hyperliquid just made it possible to trade perpetual contracts on crypto indices directly from its layer-1 blockchain. The product, called S&P 2.0, went live on July 8, giving traders a new way to get leveraged exposure to baskets of crypto assets without touching any of the underlying tokens.

What S&P 2.0 actually does While Hyperliquid did launch S&P 500 perpetuals back on March 18 through a licensing deal with Trade[XYZ], the S&P 2.0 is a different beast entirely. It focuses on crypto index perpetual contracts rather than traditional equity indices.

Advertisement

One technical detail worth noting is how the funding rates work. Most perpetual contract platforms rely on spot price oracles to keep perp prices tethered to reality. Hyperliquid takes a different approach. Its index perps use validator-published median index values for funding rate calculations. This means the network’s own validators are publishing the reference prices, which in theory reduces the risk of oracle manipulation.

The platform currently supports over 300 trading markets spanning indices, equities, and commodities.

A busy year for Hyperliquid Then came THYP, an ETF launched in May 2026. Hyperliquid has also expanded into prediction markets, further diversifying its product suite. HYPE, the native token powering the Hyperliquid ecosystem, has seen strong trading activity throughout 2026.

What this means for traders and the broader market The risk side of the equation deserves attention. While validator-published pricing is an interesting alternative to traditional oracles, it introduces its own trust assumptions. Traders need to understand that the accuracy of their index perp positions depends on the integrity and diversity of Hyperliquid’s validator set. A concentrated or compromised validator network could theoretically distort index values.

There’s also the regulatory question that hangs over every on-chain derivatives product. The licensing agreement with Trade[XYZ] for the S&P 500 perps suggests Hyperliquid is at least thinking about compliance, but the crypto index products may operate in grayer territory.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Hyperliquid’s suite of spot ETFs just pulled in $112 million in a single week, setting a new record for the decentralized perpetual futures platform. The bulk of that capital flowed into Grayscale’s HYPG, a staking ETF that launched on June 3, 2026, and has already accumulated roughly $128.6 million in assets under management.

The numbers behind the HYPE Three ETFs currently offer exposure to Hyperliquid’s native HYPE token: 21Shares’ THYP, Bitwise’s BHYP, and Grayscale’s HYPG. All three launched between mid-May and early June 2026, and the early data is striking.

Combined cumulative net inflows topped $150 million within just the first month of trading. By mid-June, the trio had amassed roughly $209 million in total assets, representing about 1.4% of HYPE’s market cap.

Advertisement

Trading volume across the three products surged to nearly $900 million. THYP and BHYP hit peak daily inflows of approximately $25.5 million around May 20-21, contributing to weekly records that exceeded $70 million before HYPG even entered the picture.

Not a single week of net outflows has been recorded across any of the three funds in early data. HYPE experienced an eight-day inflow streak in late May that coincided with the token’s price surging past the $62 to $73 range, with the token hitting multiple all-time highs and peaking somewhere between $60 and $75.

Why institutions are paying attention Grayscale’s HYPG charges a 0.29% management fee and offers staking rewards north of 2% annually, giving investors exposure to HYPE’s price action while earning yield through a regulated wrapper.

Hyperliquid itself runs on a custom Layer-1 blockchain with sub-second transaction finality. The platform built its reputation as the dominant venue for decentralized perpetual futures trading, but it’s been expanding into stocks and commodities.

During the same period that HYPE ETFs were setting records, Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced outflows, with investors appearing to rebalance toward HYPE products for regulated exposure.

What this means for investors The $209 million in combined ETF assets representing only 1.4% of HYPE’s market cap suggests substantial room for growth if institutional adoption deepens, compared to Bitcoin ETFs where ETF holdings represent a significantly larger share of total supply.

Risks remain real. Hyperliquid’s platform concentration in derivatives trading means a single exploit or regulatory action could dent confidence quickly. The expansion into stocks and commodities adds another variable: if Hyperliquid successfully bridges traditional and crypto markets on a single infrastructure layer, the HYPE token’s value proposition grows considerably.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Hyperliquid (@HyperliquidX) $HYPE has overtaken Dogecoin (@dogecoin) $DOGE to claim ninth place in the global cryptocurrency market cap rankings, marking one of the more notable ranking shifts of the current cycle.

What Is Driving the Move The rally has been underpinned by a combination of rising platform usage, competitive fees, and a mechanical buyback programme embedded directly in the protocol. Around 99% of fees from Hyperliquid's perpetuals and spot order book are routed to the Assistance Fund, which continuously purchases and burns HYPE tokens, removing them permanently from circulating supply. The result is a structural link between trading volume and token demand: the more the exchange trades, the more tokens get bought and destroyed.

That volume has been substantial. Hyperliquid has now crossed $1.1 billion in cumulative buybacks, with the protocol recording a single buyback of $283 million, described as the largest in the industry since the start of 2026. The platform has burned over 41 million tokens to date, reducing circulating supply by roughly 4.2%.

Geopolitical tension also played a role. When Middle East volatility spiked, Hyperliquid's around-the-clock trading gave it an edge over venues that observe fixed daily halt periods. TD Securities noted that the platform's oil perpetual futures volume jumped from $25 million to over $550 million across three weekends of the US-Israel-Iran conflict, as traders sought continuous price discovery when traditional markets were closed.

Where HYPE Stands Now HYPE set an all-time high of $76.87 on June 16, 2026. At the time of writing, the token sits approximately 9% below that level, having gained 13.3% over the prior seven days, according to CoinGecko data. The token has risen roughly 205% since January 2026.

Institutional interest has added further support. The Bitwise spot HYPE ETF began trading in May 2026 and spot HYPE ETF products collectively recorded $111 million in inflows as of June 30, a contrast to outflows seen in Bitcoin and Ethereum funds over the same period.

The broader narrative around the ranking change reflects a shift in what the market is rewarding. DOGE, which held a top-ten position for much of the past two years, has lacked comparable fundamental catalysts. Analysts have noted that the 2026 cycle has broadly favoured tokens with clear revenue streams over legacy meme coins.

Sources:
DeFiLlama: Hyperliquid Protocol Fees and Revenue
Crypto Briefing: Hyperliquid Records Largest Crypto Buyback at $283M Since January
Watcher.Guru: Hyperliquid Overtakes Dogecoin, Eyes New All-Time High

The spot @HyperliquidX ETFs posted net inflows of $4.32M for the week ending July 4, marking their weakest weekly performance since launching in mid-May 2026. While still positive, the figure represents a notable cooldown from the pace that made these products some of the most closely watched new ETFs in crypto this year.

A Strong Start That Has Slowed The suite of spot $HYPE ETFs, which includes Bitwise's BHYP, 21Shares' THYP, and Grayscale's HYPG, had an explosive debut. The products crossed $100M in combined net inflows within just 10 trading sessions of their mid-May 2026 debut, a pace that, on a market-cap-adjusted basis, no prior altcoin ETF had matched. Inflows accelerated sharply early on, jumping from $6.89M in the partial launch week to $68.02M for the full week ending May 22, a near 10x week-over-week surge.

The momentum continued into June. Spot Hyperliquid ETFs attracted $111M in net inflows on June 29 alone, even as U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs faced significant outflows. That single-day figure dwarfs the entire week's tally reported this week, underscoring how sharply the pace has moderated.

Despite the slower week, the ETFs have seen remarkably few down days. According to @BSCNews, the products have recorded only two days of net outflows since launch (June 5 and June 30), a sign of durable if cooling institutional interest.

Supply Lock-Up Continues Perhaps more telling than weekly flow figures is the cumulative supply impact. The spot $HYPE ETFs now collectively hold 2.28% of $HYPE's current circulating supply, a meaningful concentration that reduces the float available to open-market participants. The two leading funds have attracted over $137M in total, validating institutional demand for the asset.

Part of the structural appeal for ETF investors is $HYPE's built-in buyback mechanism. Hyperliquid runs a mechanism called the Assistance Fund, with 99% of trading fees from the exchange's perpetual and spot markets flowing into it, and the fund spending that money buying $HYPE on the open market. That dynamic, combined with ETF inflows locking up supply, has drawn comparisons to the demand structures seen in early Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF cycles.

Whether this week's softer inflow number signals a sustained deceleration or simply a pause after June's record-setting activity remains to be seen. What is clear is that the $HYPE ETF category, barely two months old, has already redefined expectations for altcoin ETF launches.

Sources:
CNBC: Bitcoin is cratering, but a new Wall Street crypto hype is on the rise
CryptoNews: Hyperliquid Price Prediction 2026
FXStreet: Hyperliquid Price Forecast, Easing ETF Flows