Bitcoin ended 2025 with an outcome few historical models would have predicted.
The final quarter of the year closed down –22.62%, making it the second-worst fourth quarter on record. Only the deep bear-market collapse of 2018 produced a weaker Q4 result.
What makes the move striking is not just the size of the loss, but when it happened.
A Quarter That Usually Performs Best
Across Bitcoin’s history, Q4 has consistently been the strongest part of the calendar. Long-term data shows an average Q4 gain of +77.11% and a median return of +47.73%. In many cycles, year-end momentum either confirmed bull trends or staged meaningful recoveries after weak summers.
In 2025, that pattern completely failed. Instead of strength, the market delivered sustained downside pressure.
Why This Q4 Is An Outlier
Historical comparisons highlight just how unusual the result is. Past cycles frequently produced triple-digit Q4 rallies, including landmark years like 2017 and 2020. Even during choppy or bearish environments, Q4 often acted as a stabilizer.
A –22.62% close places 2025 among a very small group of exceptions, rather than part of any recurring trend.
The Damage Came Late
Looking at the year as a whole helps explain the shock:
Q1: –11.82%
Q2: +29.74%
Q3: +6.31%
Q4: –22.62%
Bitcoin spent much of the year recovering and building gains. Those advances were largely undone in the final quarter, concentrating losses into a period that historically does the opposite.
What The Numbers Really Say
The data does not explain catalysts or causes. What it does show clearly is structural rarity. Losses of this magnitude in Q4 are uncommon, and deviations from Bitcoin’s seasonal norms tend to stand out in hindsight.
By historical standards alone, Q4 2025 qualifies as an anomaly, reinforcing its position as one of the weakest year-end quarters Bitcoin has ever recorded.
Author
Alexander Zdravkov
Reporter at CoinsPress
Alexander Zdravkov interessiert sich leidenschaftlich für Bedeutungsfragen. Er ist seit mehr als drei Jahren im Kryptobereich tätig und hat ein Auge dafür, aufkommende Trends in der Welt der digitalen Währungen aufzuspüren. Ob er nun tiefgreifende Analysen liefert oder tagesaktuell über alle Themen berichtet, sein tiefes Verständnis und seine Begeisterung für das, was er tut, macht ihn zu einer wertvollen Ergänzung für das CoinsPress-Team.
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:154mo ago
Ethereum, Solana stake claim at on-chain dollar liquidity leader
Ethereum mainnet now processes between $90 billion and $100 billion in stablecoin transfers daily, according to Leon Waidmann, head of research at Onchain Foundation.
This comes as Solana’s on-chain SOL-USD volumes have grown to the point of being comparable to and even surpassing major centralized exchanges, like Binance and Bybit, highlighting its growing importance for real-time trading and liquidity recycling.
Where is crypto liquidity parked?
Questions about Ethereum’s dominance of the stablecoin volume and activity sector vanished when it posted a historic month in October 2025, processing approximately $2.82 trillion in stablecoin transfers, the highest monthly volume ever recorded.
In November, its stablecoin transaction volume reached $1.94 trillion, and so far in December, it has done $1.61 trillion, according to data from The Block. The major stablecoin is USDT, which dominates by over 52%.
“Ethereum is not just another smart contract platform. It has become the settlement layer for global dollar liquidity,” Waidmann wrote on X. “When serious money moves, it still settles on Ethereum mainnet. Not because it is the fastest. Because it is the most trusted.”
By sheer scale, Ethereum has a stranglehold on being the primary settlement layer for institutional dollar flows, but Solana has made its case to a growing audience too. The network’s on-chain SOL-USD volume has exceeded the combined spot trading volume on Binance and Bybit for three consecutive months, according to Kaviish Sethi, who works in data and research at Artemis.
Source: Kaviish Sethi on X
Solana’s appeal lies in its high throughput and low transaction costs, which make it well-suited for frequent trading, payments, and smaller-value transfers.
Solana or Ethereum?
While Ethereum dominates in settlement and high-value flows, Solana is establishing itself as a venue where liquidity is actively used, recycled, and traded, reinforcing its role as a market-facing layer of the ecosystem. The stablecoin dominating the Solana markets is Circle’s USDC, which leads by over 68%.
The stablecoin supply on Solana has risen to record levels, sitting at over $15 billion in market capitalization, having hit over $16 billion a few months ago, although this pales in comparison to Ethereum’s total stablecoin market cap of over $167 billion.
“Solana isn’t just a memecoin chain. It’s becoming the liquidity layer of crypto,” Sethi stated. “This is what real adoption looks like.”
The growth of both ecosystems shows that the crypto industry is growing beyond single-chain maximalism, because there’s also Tron, which is known to be one of the leading platforms for stablecoin, mostly USDT transactions.
Stablecoin adoption has also increased globally as more jurisdictions, like the United States, have put out laws that regulate its issuance, among other guidelines.
“Stablecoins made blockchains useful,” Waidmann concluded. “Ethereum made stablecoins reliable,” though Solana’s trajectory of innovative performance shows that reliability now comes in multiple forms, with both blockchains positioning themselves to capture the distinct segments of on-chain dollar liquidity.
Sign up to Bybit and start trading with $30,050 in welcome gifts
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:184mo ago
Galaxy Digital Warns 2026 Could Be Hardest Year to Predict for Bitcoin, Despite Long-Term Bullish Outlook
Galaxy Digital’s head of firmwide research, Alex Thorn, has cautioned that 2026 may be one of the most difficult years to forecast for Bitcoin, even as the firm remains optimistic about the cryptocurrency’s long-term trajectory. In a Dec. 21 post on X, Thorn described the outlook for 2026 as “too chaotic to predict,” citing heightened macroeconomic uncertainty, political risk, and uneven momentum across the crypto market.
Thorn’s comments were based on Galaxy Research’s Dec. 18 report, “26 Crypto, Bitcoin, DeFi, and AI Predictions for 2026,” which outlines expectations for digital asset markets and growing institutional adoption. At the time of writing, Thorn noted that the broader crypto market appeared to be deep in a bear phase, with Bitcoin struggling to regain sustained bullish momentum. He warned that unless Bitcoin convincingly trades above the $100,000 to $105,000 range, downside risks remain significant.
Bitcoin options markets are reinforcing that uncertainty. According to Thorn, derivatives pricing suggests traders see nearly equal probabilities for sharply different price outcomes. By mid-2026, markets are pricing similar odds of Bitcoin trading near $70,000 or $130,000, while by year-end, expectations range widely from around $50,000 to as high as $250,000. Such dispersion signals that institutional investors are preparing for major volatility rather than a clear directional trend.
Despite near-term unpredictability, Thorn highlighted signs of increasing structural maturity in the Bitcoin market. Long-term Bitcoin volatility has been gradually declining, a trend he attributes in part to institutional strategies like options overwriting and yield-generation programs, which tend to reduce extreme price swings. He also pointed to changes in the Bitcoin volatility smile, where downside protection is now priced more expensively than upside exposure, a characteristic more typical of mature assets such as equities or commodities.
Thorn emphasized that even a quiet or range-bound 2026 would not weaken Bitcoin’s long-term investment case. Galaxy Digital expects continued institutional integration, including the potential inclusion of Bitcoin in standard model portfolios by major asset-allocation platforms. Such developments could drive persistent inflows regardless of market cycles. Looking ahead, Galaxy maintains that Bitcoin could increasingly resemble gold as a hedge against monetary debasement, with the firm projecting a potential price of $250,000 by the end of 2027.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:214mo ago
XRP Price Stabilizes Above $1.90 as Selling Pressure Weakens and Reversal Signals Emerge
XRP appears to be showing its first meaningful signs of stabilization after weeks of sustained downside pressure. Following a prolonged decline within a well-defined descending channel, the price has managed to reclaim the $1.90 level and print a strong green daily candle. This move is notable not simply because of the bounce itself, but because it coincides with a visible slowdown in bearish momentum, suggesting that sellers may be losing control of the market.
Since October, XRP price action has respected a clear bearish structure, with lower highs and lower lows dominating the chart. However, recent behavior marks a shift in dynamics. Downward moves are now occurring on lighter volume, while the latest upward push showed cleaner participation and improved follow-through. This change often signals that short positions are becoming crowded and that the distribution phase may be nearing completion.
The $2 level is now the most important area to watch. It is not only a psychological round number, but also a key technical pivot. During the recent sell-off, XRP repeatedly failed at $2, turning former support into resistance. A decisive reclaim of this level would place the price back above the lower boundary of the broken structure and open the door for a move toward the middle of the broader consolidation range. Historically, rallies below $2 have been sold aggressively, while price acceptance above it tends to make sellers uncomfortable.
There is also a reflexive market component at play. Earlier in the cycle, XRP spent considerable time trading above $2. When it broke below, forced liquidations and momentum-driven exits accelerated the decline. A return to that zone could prompt sidelined participants to reenter, potentially adding upside pressure, especially if short sellers anticipate resistance too early.
Momentum indicators support the stabilization narrative. The Relative Strength Index has recovered from weak levels without entering overbought territory, a typical characteristic of early-stage reversals rather than euphoric rallies. While XRP still faces notable overhead supply between $2.10 and $2.40, the inability of sellers to push prices lower represents a material shift in market conditions and sets the stage for a potential trend change if follow-through continues.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:224mo ago
Saylor triggers fresh Bitcoin buy speculation as BTC hovers near $90k
Michael Saylor is signaling another aggressive Bitcoin accumulation for Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy). This signals that the firm is committed to its high-stakes treasury strategy even as its MSTR stock falters.
This comes as MSCI plans to remove Strategy Inc. from its global indices during its February review. The index provider has flagged concerns that the firm now functions more like an investment vehicle than an operating company. Still, market analysts have pointed out that the financial implications of such a move are severe.
Traders and institutions jockey as Bitcoin Tests $90K resistance zone
Saylor’s signal arrives as BTC trades around the $90,000 level and the formation of liquidity clusters, providing insight into the short-term market outlook. In a brief post, the executive stated that Green Dots led Orange Dots, which was followed by a graph showing the Bitcoin acquisitions of his firm. Analysts often interpret the message as a hint that more Bitcoin buying could be forthcoming soon.
The post continues a year-long pattern Saylor has used to hint at a new BTC purchase. Notably, such a weekend teaser is usually followed by a Monday morning SEC filing confirming a significant acquisition.
Still, the last time Saylor hinted at more BTC buys with green dots, Strategy established a Bitcoin reserve for dividend payments in addition to buying more BTC. This means there’s a possibility of another move besides BTC purchases again this time.
The Strategy executive chairman’s past behavior adds weight to the signal. He has often used brief, symbolic posts before announcing major Bitcoin purchases.
Institutional signals sometimes drive temporary sentiment about the BTC price. Traders are motivated to position themselves based on their expectations for purchases, even if they haven’t made a purchase yet. These investors can reduce their exposure in the short term or exit their positions when the price approaches resistance, or hedge by selling near the anticipated resistance zone.
Tom Lee’s Fundstrat has also cautioned that Bitcoin could reach $60,000, even with longer-term optimism persisting. Bitcoin is trading near a heavy resistance zone around $90,000, where liquidity and sell orders are concentrated.
Another crypto analyst, Ted Pillows, says market makers may sweep all three liquidity clusters in the next few days as Bitcoin tests the $90,000 level. Markets often move toward these zones as traders seek to fill large orders.
According to on-chain data cited by Pillars, large clusters of resting liquidity are present at that level, creating a temporary barrier for price movement. A strong buyer stepping in near this zone could influence how Bitcoin reacts to that resistance. The leading crypto’s current structure makes the message especially notable.
Institutional demand keeps Bitcoin supported amid volatility
Liquidity data shows price magnets both above and below current levels. The largest group of upside liquidity is around $90,000, while the downside liquidity ranges from $86,000 to $84,000. This suggests that institutional interest in BTC remains, despite recent volatility.
Even after incurring some substantial outflows last week, ETFs still maintain substantial Bitcoin balances. The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF is among the top six ETFs of this year.
Additionally, corporate treasuries remain active in the market. These are part of the reasons why BTC demand is not falling even at increased prices.
Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:234mo ago
Bitcoin Price Struggles Below $100K as Market Enters Repair Phase
Bitcoin is attempting to stabilize after a sharp sell-off that erased weeks of bullish momentum and shifted market sentiment noticeably. The flagship cryptocurrency is currently trading in the high $80,000 range, well below the psychological $100,000 level that previously dominated investor narratives. From a technical and structural standpoint, the Bitcoin market is now in a repair phase rather than a confirmed uptrend, with traders remaining cautious about near-term price action.
The daily Bitcoin chart highlights the extent of recent damage. BTC decisively broke below the $100,000 support zone, lost both short-term and mid-term moving averages, and accelerated lower on increasing volume. This move flushed out leveraged long positions and forced late buyers to exit. Importantly, while the selling pressure has eased and price action has stabilized, this pause should not be mistaken for a trend reversal. Consolidation after a sharp drop often reflects uncertainty rather than renewed bullish control.
Bitcoin now faces significant resistance between $93,000 and $100,000, a zone that will act as a major test for bulls. Any rally into this range must be supported by strong volume and sustained buying interest. Without a decisive reclaim of these levels, upside moves are likely to be viewed as relief rallies within a broader corrective structure, rather than the start of a new bullish leg.
Momentum indicators reinforce this cautious outlook. The Relative Strength Index has rebounded from oversold conditions, signaling that aggressive selling has cooled. However, RSI remains relatively muted, suggesting that strong bullish momentum has yet to return. This technical setup leaves the market vulnerable to either consolidation or another downward move if a catalyst fails to emerge.
Market sentiment further supports a guarded stance. Data from the regulated prediction market Kalshi indicates that traders are not expecting a swift return of Bitcoin to $100,000. While this does not rule out a future move back to six figures, expectations have clearly shifted. Bitcoin’s path forward now depends on confirmation, not assumptions, as investors wait for stronger signals before committing to renewed upside.
<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:324mo ago
Uniswap fee switch to go live as community vote set to pass
The highly-anticipated Uniswap protocol fee switch, dubbed “UNIfication,” is set to pass and go live later this week, having reached the 40 million vote threshold needed to trigger one of the biggest upgrades in the decentralized exchange protocol’s seven-year history.
As of early Monday, nearly 62 million votes have already been cast in favor of the UNIfication governance proposal since voting opened on Dec. 20, with voting set to close on Thursday, Christmas Day.
Uniswap Labs CEO Hayden Adams said on Thursday that a successful vote would follow a two-day timelock period in which Uniswap v2 and v3 fee switches would flip on the Unichain mainnet, triggering the burning of more Uniswap (UNI) tokens.
The proposal will see 100 million UNI tokens burned from the Uniswap Foundation’s treasury, while a Protocol Fee Discount Auctions system to increase liquidity provider returns would also be implemented.
The changes are expected to significantly improve the supply-demand dynamics of the UNI token and make it a more appealing token to hold over the long-term.
UNI has gained around 25% since the UNIfication voting opened, and is currently trading at $6.08, helping to pull it out of a month-long slump amid a broader market pullback that saw it fall to a seventh month low of $4.88.
Change in UNI’s price over the last week. Source: CoinGecko
News of the UNIfication proposal in early November spurred a near 40% rally in the UNI token, taking it from about $7 to $9.70 on Nov. 11.
Uniswap is the largest decentralized exchange and has processed more than $4 trillion in trading volume since launching in November 2018. CoinGecko data shows that UNI is the 39th largest token by market cap, at $3.8 billion.
Big names back UNIfication proposalSeveral crypto heavyweights with significant voting power backed the UNIfication proposal, including Jesse Waldren, founder and managing partner at crypto-focused venture capital firm Variant, Kain Warwick, the founder of decentralized finance protocols Infinex and Synthetix, and Ian Lapham, who previously worked as an engineer at Uniswap Labs.
Only 741 votes, about 0.001% of those cast, have opposed the proposal so far, while a little over 1.5 million votes have abstained.
Vote distribution for the UNIfication proposal as of late Sunday. Source: Uniswap
Uniswap will still prioritize protocol developmentAt the time the proposal was made, the Uniswap Foundation assured builders that it wouldn’t scrap issuing grants to improve protocol development and growth, stating that supporting builders would remain a priority.
The Uniswap Foundation plans to create a Growth Budget to meet these goals, which would involve distributing 20 million UNI tokens.
Magazine: 11 critical moments in Ethereum’s history that made it the No.2 blockchain
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:504mo ago
Cardano's Hoskinson warns against rushing post-quantum upgrades
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has issued a clear warning to the broader blockchain industry about rushing into post-quantum cryptography upgrades, arguing that premature implementation could degrade network performance and create unintended costs for users and validators.
“Post-quantum crypto oftentimes is about 10 times slower, 10 times larger proof sizes, and 10 times more inefficient,” Hoskinson said, noting that adding such systems without adequate hardware support could dramatically reduce throughput.
Future quantum attacks pose a significant challenge to the current blockchain system. This has prompted blockchain developers to engage in discussions on how to tackle this issue. Some of these discussions included considering some updates to protocols.
However, Hoskinson advised developers that the biggest challenge is timing; hence, they needed to focus on this aspect instead of certain amendments required. He further warned that acting rashly could result in high costs for blockchain networks. According to him, the cryptographic tools essential to protect blockchain technology from future quantum attacks are already accessible.
Hoskinson guides blockchain developers in preparation for future quantum attacks
Hoskinson pointed out that the US National Institute of Standards and Technology made post-quantum standards public in 2024. Following this release, the Cardano founder highlighted that the key issue is based on the costs associated with executing new protocols before validators and miners are ready.
Meanwhile, it is worth noting that while several researchers believe that cutting-edge quantum computers could ultimately break current cryptography, reports from sources reveal that there is still less consensus on when this threat might materialize.
However, based on the recently announced predictions, practical quantum computing could occur anytime from a few years to more than ten years from now.
Still, Hoskinson advised blockchain developers to focus on concrete developments rather than hype and corporate timelines when evaluating how soon this danger might materialize.
One of the suitable ways the Cardano founder suggested was for them to shift their focus to DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative. According to his argument, this program conducts tests on several quantum computing methods to determine whether they can produce useful outcomes.
“It’s the best independent and objective standard we can use to see if quantum computers will be real, when they will arrive, and who will build them,” Hoskinson said.
Notably, DARPA has decided that 2033 will be the year in which it will determine if large-scale quantum computing is feasible.
Hoskinson reveals a suitable solution for a major emerging problem in the crypto industry
Similar to other leading networks, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, reports from reliable sources have highlighted that Cardano utilizes elliptic-curve cryptography. It is worth noting that such a method is at great risk because of Shor’s algorithm, that is, in the event of the development of very powerful quantum computers.
This news raised tension in the crypto ecosystem as developers ignited heated debates. To address this controversy, Hoskinson noted that the industry knows suitable ways to curb this problem. Nonetheless, he mentioned that this approach is centered on deciding between two different cryptographic methods.
To further elaborate on this point, he stated that the two options to choose from include Hashes, which is utilized by Ethereum, and lattices, which is actually their preferred choice.
Concerning Hoskinson’s statement, analysts weighed in on the matter. They highlighted that Hash-based cryptography relies on cryptographic hash functions to produce digital signatures effectively, which are widely recognized as the most secure approach against future quantum threats.
The analysts also pointed out that these systems are straightforward, thoroughly researched, and established to be cautious. However, they are mainly used for signing data and are not preferable for general encryption purposes.
Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program
2025-12-22 01:124mo ago
2025-12-21 20:004mo ago
ICP rallies 22%, then slips 8% – What comes next after this volatility?
The Vice President of Dfinity Foundation, Lomesh Dutta, said that the rise of AI-powered no-code tools for the generation and evolution of applications will enable secure, stable, tamper-resistant infrastructure.
This could help prevent the kind of outage that many crypto companies and Web3 applications faced in the aftermath of the AWS outage in October.
Dfinity Foundation is a non-profit organization that guides the Internet Computer [ICP] blockchain development.
These statements could have brought ICP back to the public eye, helping explain the recent rally. ICP gained 22.6% from Friday’s low, but has faced a minor pullback in recent hours of trading.
Profit-taking activity wipes out ICP’s November rally
Source: ICP/USDT on TradingView
The 3-day chart showed a bearish internal structure and a complete retracement of the November rally from $2.79 to $9.85. It was expected that the $5 and the $4.3 supports would be defended, but these expectations were proven wrong.
The DMI did not show a strong trend in progress, but its confusing signals served to capture the speed of the recent impulse move and the subsequent retracement. The OBV was slowly bleeding lower, and the MACD also displayed bearish momentum.
To flip the structure bullishly, ICP has to move back above $3.78.
Source: ICP/USDT on TradingView
The 4-hour chart showcased an imbalance at the $3.2 area, highlighted in white. This imbalance came after a bullish structure break on this timeframe. At the time of writing, ICP was facing a minor price dip, having shed 8.46% in under 12 hours.
The technical indicators were in favor of the bulls, but traders must remember that the higher timeframe structure is still bearish. Until a move beyond $3.78 comes about, traders need to be careful about taking bullish positions.
Assessing the next ICP move
The market-wide sentiment, especially for Bitcoin [BTC], remained mostly bearish. Until this changes bullishly, it remains likely that altcoins that make strong gains will run into heavy sell pressure from profit-taking activity.
Lower timeframe traders can look to buy ICP now, with a stop-loss below the local support at $2.9.
Traders’ call to action- remain bearish
Until the $3.78 level is breached by a 3-day timeframe candle close, swing traders can remain bearish. The 1-day timeframe also highlights the same local resistance as a key swing point.
Final Thoughts
The rise of AI-powered no-code tools that were brought to public attention recently could have helped Internet Computer post some of its recent gains.
The price action remained in favor of the bears over the past month, and traders should be wary of going long until the structure shifts bullishly.
Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 16:134mo ago
Critical Shiba Inu Price Level Revealed to Bulls, Ripple CEO Celebrates XRP ETF Milestone, DOGE Price Might Add Zero, Solana Eyes Golden Cross – Top Weekly Crypto News
SBI VC Trade opens new rent coin lending round in JapanSBI Group is now a massive institutional partner of Ripple, the company associated with XRP.
Recruitment round. SBI VC Trade, a subsidiary of SBI Holdings, announced a new recruitment round for its “Rent Coin” (lending) service.SBI VC Trade, a major Japanese cryptocurrency exchange and subsidiary of the financial giant SBI Holdings, is opening a new recruitment round for its "Rent Coin" (Lending) service.
The recruitment period begins tonight, Dec. 18, 2025, at 20:00 (JST). The exchange supports lending for 34 assets, including XRP, Bitcoin (BTC), and even meme cryptocurrency Dogecoin (DOGE).
HOT Stories
Holding yield. The program allows users to earn returns on idle crypto holdings, unlike standard wallet storage, which typically generates no yield.Unlike stocks with dividends or banks with interest, holding crypto in a wallet usually yields nothing. This service turns idle crypto into an income-generating asset.
It is worth noting that applications are generally approved on a first-come, first-served basis, and popular coins (often XRP and DOT) can hit capacity quickly (waitlisted).
SBI VC Trade first launched its cryptocurrency lending service in November 2020. Initially, it only supported Bitcoin (BTC). The minimum loan was 0.1 BTC, and it offered a 1% usage fee (interest).
XRP ETFs log 30 straight days of inflows as Bitcoin and Ethereum lagXRP ETFs have recorded an impressive streak of inflows, and Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has taken note of this fact.
ETFs inflows. The collective group of XRP exchange-traded funds has now recorded positive net inflows for 30 consecutive trading sessions.The collective group of XRP ETFs has recorded positive net inflows for 30 consecutive trading sessions. For comparison, Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have experienced "choppier" flows Ripple Brad Garlinghouse recently took to the X social media platform to highlight the recent milestone recorded by the XRP products.
$250 million debut. Canary Capital launched the first U.S. spot XRP ETF.Canary Capital launched the first U.S. spot XRP ETF. It debuted with record first-day volume for a non-Ethereum altcoin ETF, attracting nearly $250 million quickly.
Following Canary's success, other major issuers went live in rapid succession to capture market share. These include Franklin Templeton (XRPZ), Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP), and Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP). There are also other launches in the pipeline.
Shiba Inu prints rare price-on-chain divergenceShiba Inu is still losing supply on exchanges, which is a great sign for the future of the asset.
Exchange outflows. Nearly 100 billion SHIB left centralized exchanges within a 24-hour window.Shiba Inu is showing one of the more interesting divergences it has printed in months. While the price continues to grind lower and sit uncomfortably near local lows, on-chain behavior tells a different story. Nearly 100 billion SHIB are leaving exchanges in a 24-hour window. That kind of outflow matters, especially at depressed price levels.
Bullish sign. This behavior typically signals reduced immediate sell pressure, not aggressive distribution.Exchange reserve data shows a clear contraction. Coins are moving off trading platforms, not piling onto them. That typically signals reduced immediate sell pressure, not aggressive distribution. At this stage of the cycle, sustained outflows suggest holders are choosing custody over liquidity, which is often how bottoms form rather than how crashes accelerate.
SHIB downside pressure builds as liquidation levels tilt against bullsShiba Inu coin dropped to a level where leveraged bulls are forced out rather than being driven by hype.
SHIB price target. The level inflicting the most damage on SHIB bulls sits near $0.00777, while the level that hurts shorts is higher, around $0.0086.According to CoinGlass, the level causing the most damage to SHIB bulls sits near $0.00777, while the level that hurts shorts is higher, near $0.0086. With the price trading around $0.00816, the downside liquidation zone is simply closer. That matters because the price often moves toward the nearest group of traders who can be forced out of the market.
Price warning. If price slides into that zone slowly, liquidation-driven selling can extend the move lower as pressure continues to build.A drop of less than 5% can trigger long liquidations. A move up needs more than 5% and stronger buying pressure to start hurting shorts. So, the only thing evident about the Shiba Inu coin right now is an imbalance, where downside pressure is easier to activate than upside pressure.
If the price briefly dips into the $0.0077-$0.0078 zone and selling dries up quickly, weak longs are cleared and price can stabilize. That is how short-term bottoms often appear. If price slides into that zone slowly, pressure can extend lower as liquidations keep feeding selling.
Solana volume spike and golden cross signal renewed bullish momentumSolana's price surge might be closer with skyrocketing volume and promising golden cross setup.
SOL Volume spike. Solana trading volume surged by 40%, signaling increased attention from both retail and institutional investors.The 40% spike in Solana trading volume suggests increased network attention by both retail and institutional investors. As the SOL price showed signs of recovery, investors are gradually shifting their attention back to the coin.
After days of trading on the low, the SOL price surged 1.6% over the past 24 hours to $132.9. At the same time, technical analysis showed the formation of a golden cross, often recognized as a highly bullish pattern.
Golden cross alert. This setup suggests short-term momentum is beginning to outperform the broader trend.
Typically, a golden cross pattern occurs when a shorter-term moving average crosses above a longer-term one. This signals that short-term momentum is outpacing the long-term trend, often preceding sustained upward price movement.
A 40% trading volume accompanying this setup strengthens the signal. This is because it indicates strong buyer conviction and increased market participation. Earlier golden crosses seen on the Solana price chart this year contributed to rallies, pushing SOL toward $200 to $228 in various periods.
Dogecoin chart issues downside warningDOGE bulls are facing a hard reality as Dogecoin loses a key structure.
Dogecoin (DOGE) is slipping back toward price levels last seen in 2024, according to analyst Ali Martinez’s monthly chart.
In late 2025, Dogecoin (DOGE), the most popular meme coin, finds itself in a zone where the chart is no longer showing polite warnings, but rather is starting to issue more serious alerts. As highlighted by analyst Ali Martinez on the monthly chart, DOGE is dipping back down to levels that were last visited in 2024.
It is really all about the selling pressure due to which Dogecoin could drop to $0.1 or even lower, to around $0.062, and that second level is the uncomfortable one, because it will mean Dogecoin adding a zero back to its price, totally changing expectations not only for the biggest meme coin, but the sector as a whole.
Distribution. DOGE failed to hold the $0.16–$0.18 range, which previously acted as strong support.The setup did not come out all of a sudden overnight. First, DOGE could not stay above the $0.16-$0.18 range, which had been a good spot before during stronger periods. Once the price dropped out of that zone, it became resistance, and every bounce since has stalled faster than the last. Classic distribution behavior, not accumulation.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 16:254mo ago
Galaxy Digital's head of research explains why bitcoin's outlook is so uncertain in 2026
Galaxy Digital’s head of research explains why bitcoin’s outlook is so uncertain in 2026Galaxy Digital’s Alex Thorn says options markets, falling volatility and macro risks make next year hard to forecast even as the firm keeps a bullish long-term view. Dec 21, 2025, 9:25 p.m.
Galaxy Digital’s head of firmwide research, Alex Thorn, says 2026 may be one of the most difficult years to forecast for bitcoin, even as the firm maintains a bullish long-term outlook.
In a Dec. 21 post on X, Thorn said the coming year is “too chaotic to predict,” pointing to a mix of macro uncertainty, political risk and uneven crypto market momentum. Thorn said the comments were based on Galaxy Research’s Dec. 18 report, “26 Crypto, Bitcoin, DeFi, and AI Predictions for 2026,” which outlines the firm’s expectations for crypto markets and institutional adoption.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
At the time of writing, Thorn said the broader crypto market was already deep in a bear phase, with bitcoin struggling to re-establish sustained bullish momentum. Until the asset decisively trades above the $100,000 to $105,000 range, he said, downside risk remains.
What options markets are signalingDerivatives markets underscore that uncertainty. According to Thorn, bitcoin options pricing implies roughly equal probabilities of sharply different outcomes next year, with traders assigning similar odds to prices near $70,000 or $130,000 by mid-2026 and near $50,000 or $250,000 by year-end.
Options markets are widely used by institutional investors to hedge future price risk, and such wide ranges suggest professionals are preparing for large price swings rather than a clear directional trend.
Signs of structural maturityAt the same time, Thorn pointed to signs of structural change beneath the surface. He said that long-term bitcoin volatility — a measure of how widely prices fluctuate over extended periods — has been declining. He attributed part of that shift to the growth of institutional strategies such as options overwriting and yield-generation programs, which tend to dampen extreme price moves.
That evolution is also visible in bitcoin’s volatility smile, which describes how option prices vary across strike levels. Thorn said that downside protection is now priced more expensively than upside exposure, a pattern more commonly seen in mature macro assets, such as equities or commodities, than in high-growth markets.
Why a quiet year may not matterFor Thorn, those signals help explain why a potentially range-bound or “boring” 2026 would not undermine bitcoin’s longer-term case. Even if prices drift lower or approach long-term technical levels such as the 200-week moving average, he expects institutional adoption and market maturation to continue.
In its Dec. 18 report, the firm stated that a major asset-allocation platform could incorporate bitcoin into standard model portfolios, a move that would embed the asset into default investment strategies rather than through discretionary trades. Such inclusion would direct persistent flows into bitcoin regardless of market cycles, reinforcing Galaxy’s view that structural adoption — rather than near-term volatility — will shape outcomes into 2027 and beyond.
Thorn believes that expanding institutional access, potential easing of monetary conditions, and demand for alternatives to fiat currencies could position bitcoin to follow gold’s path as a hedge against monetary debasement. Galaxy predicts that the flagship cryptocurrency could reach $250,000 by the end of 2027.
AI Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.
More For You
Protocol Research: GoPlus Security
Nov 14, 2025
What to know:
As of October 2025, GoPlus has generated $4.7M in total revenue across its product lines. The GoPlus App is the primary revenue driver, contributing $2.5M (approx. 53%), followed by the SafeToken Protocol at $1.7M.GoPlus Intelligence's Token Security API averaged 717 million monthly calls year-to-date in 2025 , with a peak of nearly 1 billion calls in February 2025. Total blockchain-level requests, including transaction simulations, averaged an additional 350 million per month.Since its January 2025 launch , the $GPS token has registered over $5B in total spot volume and $10B in derivatives volume in 2025. Monthly spot volume peaked in March 2025 at over $1.1B , while derivatives volume peaked the same month at over $4B.View Full Report
More For You
Fed’s Hammack tilts hawkish on rates, questions CPI drop as distorted
9 hours ago
"My base case is that we can stay here for some period of time," Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack told the WSJ.
What to know:
Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, who will be a voter on the central bank's policy-making FOMC in 2026, says interest rates need to remain on hold for several months.She threw shade on last week's surprisingly soft CPI report, noting data-collection distortions created by the government shutdown.Other things being equal, bitcoin would typically benefit from easier Fed monetary policy, but that hasn't at all been the case in 2025.Read full story
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:004mo ago
PIPPIN surges 20%, defends key support: Is a new ATH in sight?
After retracing and dipping below the supply zone at $0.4 to $0.34, PIPPIN bounced back. The memecoin surged 20.27% to a local high of $0.48 before slightly retracing to $0.451 as of this writing.
Over the same period, PIPPIN’s market cap recovered from $308 million dip to $443 million, marking a $100 million jump.
But what triggered the rebound?
Demand for PIPPIN Futures rebounds
After PIPPIN breached the $0.4 support level, traders in the Futures market took the opportunity to add to existing positions.
According to CoinGlass, the memecoin’s Open Interest surged 24.29% to $150.73 million, but derivatives volume dropped 16% to $551 million.
Such a combination suggested existing holders added to or opened new positions while the market recorded less opposing activity.
Source: CoinGlass
New long positions were added, while exiting ones continued to hold. In fact, significant capital flowed into Futures.
The memecoin saw $168.44 million in Futures inflow, compared to $165.35 million in Sell Volume. As a result, Futures Netflow surged 136.74% to $3.09 million, a clear signal of buyer dominance.
Source: CoinGlass
Meanwhile, PIPPIN’s Long/Short Ratio jumped to 1.0251, but averaged around 0.5 across Binance and OKX. Often, a Ratio above 1 suggests that investors mainly deployed capital into taking long positions.
Buyers defend key levels
In the Spot market, as PIPPIN dropped below its critical zone, buyers stepped in and bought the dip.
According to TradingView, PIPPIN’s liquidity significantly dropped. Volume dropped to 3 million over the past 24 hours, compared to the 14-day moving average of 24.64 million.
Source: TradingView
The A/D Moving Average is at 10.44 million at press time, indicating reduced market participation.
Despite the reduced liquidity, buyers have dominated the market. At press time, Buy Sell Volume sat around 881k, while Buy Volume was 811.33k compared to 70.44k in sell volume.
The market shows extreme buying dominance with 98% while sellers controlled only 2% of the total.
Is the uptrend momentum sustainable?
PIPPIN rebounded as buyers stepped in across the Spot and Futures market and defended $0.4 zone.
As a result, the memecoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) made a bullish crossover, hiking to 72. At the same time, its Stochastic RSI also made a bullish crossover at 51, edging into the bullish zone.
Source: TradingView
When these two momentum indicators make a bullish crossover, it signals strong upward momentum with buyers dominating the market.
Often, such a combination positions the memecoin for a potential continuation of the trend. Therefore, if buyers continue to accumulate, PIPPIN could clear the $0.5 resistance and make another high.
Conversely, if profit taking picks up, another pullback could emerge, with $0.4 acting as key support.
Final Thoughts
Pippin surged 20.27% after successfully defending $0.4 and jumped to a local high of $0.48.
PIPPIN is well-positioned to reclaim $0.5 and target another eye if buying momentum.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:064mo ago
Galaxy Digital predicts Bitcoin could reach $250,000 despite 2026 uncertainty
Galaxy Digital’s crypto market predictions for 2026 include Bitcoin hitting $250,000 in the not-so-distant future despite the cryptocurrency losing about 30.2% of its value from its ATH of $126,080 in 2025.
2026 has been declared “too chaotic to predict” by Galaxy Digital Research, but that has not stopped the Mie Novogratz-led company from predicting that Bitcoin will hit $250,000 by the end of 2027.
Bitcoin predictions for 2026
Galaxy Digital Research has released its annual crypto market predictions for 2026, predicting that Bitcoin will reach $250,000 by the end of 2027, although they acknowledge that 2026 remains too unpredictable to call it with confidence.
Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, explained that options markets currently price equal odds of Bitcoin hitting either $70,000 or $130,000 by June 2026, and equal odds of $50,000 or $250,000 by year-end 2026.
Bitcoin hit an all-time high of $126,080 on October 6, 2025, driven by regulatory reforms and ETF inflows during the first ten months of the year.
However, the market experienced a sharp reversal and witnessed leverage liquidations, whale distribution, and shifting investment narratives. By December, Bitcoin had fallen back to the low $90,000 range and currently trades around $88,000.
The report identifies several factors responsible for the potential uncertainty for 2026, including the rate of AI capital expenditure deployment, monetary policy conditions, and the U.S. midterm elections in November.
Thorn emphasized that until Bitcoin firmly re-establishes itself above the $100,000 to $105,000 level, downside risk remains in the near term.
Galaxy released 26 predictions covering various aspects of the crypto ecosystem, including expectations that more than 50 spot altcoin ETFs will launch in the United States, U.S. spot crypto ETF net inflows will exceed $50 billion, and at least 15 crypto companies will IPO or uplist in the U.S. during 2026.
How accurate were Galaxy’s 2025 predictions?
Galaxy Digital predicted at the beginning of the year that Bitcoin would cross $150,000 in the first half and possibly reach $185,000 in the fourth quarter. By November, Thorn had lowered the year-end target to $125,000, and even that revised forecast appears unlikely to be met due to the significantly lower Bitcoin trades in December.
A major leverage unwinding event on October 10, 2025, caused significant market disruption, erasing approximately $78 billion in open interest across crypto futures.
More than 470,000 Bitcoins held for over five years, worth approximately $50 billion, changed hands during 2025. Galaxy facilitated one of the year’s largest single transfers, involving $9 billion worth of assets from a legacy whale.
Throughout 2025, institutional investment was more toward artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, nuclear energy, quantum technology, and gold.
Galaxy predicted that at least one major wealth management platform would announce a 2% or higher recommended Bitcoin allocation. It hit on that one as Morgan Stanley published a report announcing up to 4% allocation. They also accurately forecast that more than half of the top 20 publicly traded Bitcoin miners would become or partner with AI and high-performance computing firms.
However, Bitcoin did not cross $150,000 as Galaxy initially predicted, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs did not collectively reach $250 billion in assets under management, and Bitcoin did not finish among the top performers on a risk-adjusted basis among global assets.
Galaxy Digital sees big 2026 for stablecoins
Galaxy Digital predicts that stablecoins will overtake the U.S. Automated Clearing House system in transaction volume due to current data showing stablecoin transactions already exceeding major credit card networks like Visa and processing roughly half the volume of the ACH system.
Thad Pinakiewicz, vice president of research at Galaxy, said that stablecoin supply has been growing at a 30% to 40% compound annual growth rate along with transaction volumes. According to data from DefiLlama, the stablecoin market cap currently stands at approximately $309 billion, with Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC continuing to dominate the market.
Galaxy expects the passage and implementation of the GENIUS Act in early 2026 to accelerate stablecoin adoption. The act was signed into law by President Trump in July 2025 and provides regulatory clarity for stablecoins. It is expected to enable both incumbent tokens to grow and new entrants to compete for market share.
Jianing Wu, a research associate at Galaxy, explained that consumers and merchants are unlikely to juggle multiple digital dollars and will instead gravitate toward one or two options with the broadest acceptance.
Nine major banks, including Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, and Citigroup, are already exploring plans to launch stablecoins based on G7 currencies.
In October, Western Union revealed plans for its U.S. Dollar Payment Token on the Solana blockchain. Sony Bank is developing a stablecoin for integration across its U.S. ecosystem, including PlayStation and subscription services, with a planned 2026 launch. Cryptopolitan reported earlier this month that SoFi Technologies has introduced SoFiUSD, a fully reserved dollar stablecoin issued by SoFi Bank on Ethereum.
Galaxy’s expectations include that at least one of the top three global card networks will conduct more than 10% of its cross-border settlement volume through public-chain stablecoins, though most end users will never see a crypto interface.
Galaxy predicts that decentralized exchanges will capture more than 25% of combined spot trading volume by the end of 2026, up from roughly 15-17% currently. The firm also expects total crypto-backed loans outstanding to exceed $90 billion and predicts that more than $500 million worth of DAO treasury assets will be governed exclusively by futarchy decision-making systems.
Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:084mo ago
Bhutan Commits 10,000 BTC to Developing a Mindfulness-Based Economic Hub
The Bitcoin Development Pledge aligns with the king’s vision of applying modern digital technologies to serve the people of Bhutan and future generations.
The Kingdom of Bhutan has taken its adoption of bitcoin (BTC) a step further by allocating a portion of its reserves to the development of its new special administrative region, Gelephu Mindfulness City (GMC).
According to a press release sent to CryptoPotato, the country will channel 10,000 BTC, worth roughly $1 billion, to support the long-term development of GMC. GMC is a new economic hub designed for mindfulness, sustainability, and innovation.
Bhutan Unveils Bitcoin Development Pledge
Bhutan’s ruler, His Majesty King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, unveiled the Bitcoin Development Pledge via his National Day Address earlier this week. The commitment aligns with the king’s vision of applying modern digital technologies to serve the people of Bhutan and future generations.
The country will assess several approaches that would enable the long-term use of the pledged assets. The options under consideration include collateralising the Kingdom’s bitcoin holdings, implementing yield management strategies, and preserving asset value while holding them long-term.
Bhutan will guide any use of BTC in the GMC by prudence and strong governance, ensuring transparency and capital preservation. The country will prioritize preserving long-term potential while developing the economic hub in a stable and sustainable manner.
Jigdrel Singay, Board Director at GMC, commented on the approach, saying: “Bhutan’s position is that its Bitcoin holdings are intended for the long term, and that commitment is reiterated clearly in the Development Pledge. The specific strategy is still being worked on, and the examples mentioned in the announcement outline the range of responsible options under consideration. There is no change to Bhutan’s long-term stewardship approach toward its Bitcoin reserves.”
GMC to be Powered by Digital Infrastructure
Besides being a mindfulness hub, GMC will also provide regulatory clarity, financial connectivity, and a long-term environment for collaboration. The hub is open to partnerships from both local and international digital asset entities. Bhutan has already integrated digital assets into the hub’s strategic reserves and enabled crypto-based payments across services. The Kingdom has also launched TER, a sovereign-backed token linked to physical gold.
You may also like:
Bitcoin (BTC) Looks Weak, But Bitwise Says New Highs Are Coming in 2026
Binance Hits 300M Registered Accounts 8 Years After Launch – Key Drivers Behind the Growth
On-Chain Metrics Suggest Shallow Bitcoin Bear Market with $56K Bottom
These efforts build on the country’s track record of being one of the earliest adopters of BTC and digital asset infrastructure. Since 2017, Bhutan has quietly been mining BTC using clean energy.
“As your King, I must ensure that every Bhutanese is a custodian, stakeholder, and beneficiary of GMC…This commitment is for our people, our youth, and our nation,” Bhutan’s ruler stated.
Tags:
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:264mo ago
Terraform Labs Administrator Sues Jump Trading for $4B Tied to Terra Meltdown
Jump Trading faces a $4 billion lawsuit accusing the firm of secretly manipulating the Terra ecosystem and profiting from the collapse that erased roughly $40 billion in investor value. As reported by the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg, the lawsuit was filed Dec.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:274mo ago
Bitcoin Critical Holders' Profit Crashes To Monthly Low: Will Price Further Suffer?
Bitcoin has shown mixed price action in recent sessions, marked by sharp fluctuations and tentative recovery attempts. BTC rebounded after a brief breakdown, yet momentum remains fragile.
A key concern is weakening confidence among one of Bitcoin’s most influential cohorts, which could complicate efforts to sustain a broader price recovery.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Bitcoin Holders Witness A Dip In GainsBitcoin long-term holders have increased selling activity over the past several days. On-chain data shows the 30-day change in long-term holder supply has dropped to a 20-month low.
Similar levels were last recorded in April 2024, signaling elevated distribution pressure.
This behavior suggests long-term holders are reducing exposure to protect remaining gains. As unrealized profits shrink, selling accelerates to avoid losses. Such actions often weigh on price recovery, as supply increases without a matching rise in new demand.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
Bitcoin LTH Position Change. Source: GlassnodeMacro indicators provide additional context. The long-term holder net unrealized profit or loss metric has declined to a monthly low. This drop indicates profits among this group are eroding, increasing sensitivity to further downside moves.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Historically, falling LTH NUPL readings trigger defensive selling. However, once the indicator declines further, selling pressure often slows.
At those levels, long-term holders typically pause distribution, allowing Bitcoin price to stabilize and potentially recover if demand improves.
Bitcoin LTH NUPL. Source: GlassnodeBTC Price Is Awaiting Stronger CuesBitcoin trades near $87,900 at the time of writing, remaining below the $88,210 resistance. The asset recently bounced after briefly slipping under the $86,247 support. This recovery shows buyers are still active at lower levels, though conviction remains cautious.
A short-term climb toward $90,308 remains possible. However, resistance near that level could cap gains. Given ongoing long-term holder selling, Bitcoin may continue consolidating near the $88,201 zone while the market absorbs excess supply.
Bitcoin Price Analysis. Source: TradingViewUpside potential improves if long-term holders shift their stance. A slowdown in selling could reduce overhead pressure.
In that scenario, Bitcoin may break above $90,308 and target $92,933. Such a move would invalidate the bearish thesis and signal renewed confidence among key market participants.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:364mo ago
Bitcoin miners are bleeding at $90,000, but the “death spiral” math hits a hard ceiling
Bitcoin’s “miners are dumping” story is comforting in the way simple stories always are. Price slides, miners run out of oxygen, coins hit exchanges, and the price is shoved around by a single, easy villain.
But miners are not a single actor, and selling pressure isn't just a mood. It's math, contracts, and deadlines. When stress shows up, what matters is not whether miners want to sell, but whether they have to, and how much they can sell without breaking the business they’re trying to keep alive.
That’s why the most useful way to think about a miner “capitulation” is as a thought experiment. Imagine you’re running a mine right now, in a market where the hashrate ribbon flipped into inversion territory, and price trades below a rough, difficulty-based estimate for average all-in sustaining cost, around $90,000.
At the same time, total miner holdings sit at around 50,000 BTC: not small by any measure, but not bottomless either.
Now you’ve got a simple question that sounds dramatic. If price sits below the average AISC line for a while, how many coins can you push out over 30 to 90 days before lenders, power contracts, and your own operating reality push back?
AISC is a moving target, not a single numberAll-in sustaining cost, or AISC, is crypto’s borrowed term from mining and commodities, but it earns its keep because it forces you to stop pretending electricity is the only bill. AISC is basically a number that determines whether you can stay in business. Not “can you keep the machines on today,” but “can you keep the operation healthy enough that it still exists next quarter.”
You can think of Bitcoin miners' AISC as having three layers, even if different research shops draw the boundaries differently.
The first layer is the one everyone understands: direct operating cash costs. Electricity sits at the center of it, because the meter runs whether you’re feeling bullish or not. Add hosting fees (if you don’t own your site), repairs, pool fees, network ops, and the people who keep the facility from turning into an expensive space heater.
The second layer is the one the memes skip: sustaining capex. This isn't growth capex: sustaining capex is the money you spend to stop your fleet from slowly dying. Fans fail, hashboards degrade, containers rust, and, more importantly, the network gets tougher. Even if your machines are fine, you can lose a share of the pie if everyone else upgrades and you don’t.
That’s where difficulty comes in. Bitcoin adjusts mining difficulty so blocks keep arriving roughly on schedule. When hashrate rises, difficulty ratchets up, and the same machine earns fewer BTC for the same energy burn.
When hashrate falls, difficulty can ease, and the remaining miners get a slightly better bite. The AISC framing we're using is explicitly based on difficulty, which is a clean way to capture this moving target without needing every miner’s private power contract.
The third layer is what turns stress into forced behavior: corporate costs and financing. A private operator might care mostly about power and maintenance. A public miner with debt cares about interest payments, covenants, liquidity buffers, and the ability to refinance.
This is why AISC changes over time in a way that makes single-number debates feel silly. It changes when difficulty changes, and when the fleet mix changes (older machines get pushed out, newer ones come in).
It changes when the power environment changes, especially for miners exposed to spot pricing, and it changes when capital costs change, which is why a miner can look stable at one point in the cycle and fragile at another with the same hash output.
So when price dips below an average AISC estimate like ~$90,000, it doesn't mean the whole network is instantly underwater, just that the center of mass is uncomfortable. Some miners are fine, some are pinched, and some are in triage. The stress is real, but the response is uneven, and that unevenness is what keeps the “everyone dumps at once” from being the default outcome.
There’s another reason the default outcome isn’t a dump. Miners have more levers than just selling their BTC: they can shut down marginal machines, curtail for grid payments, roll hedges, and renegotiate hosting terms. And, as previously covered by CryptoSlate, many now have side businesses tied to AI data-centers, which can buffer a bad mining month.
That gets us to the real question, which is when stress is on, how much selling is structurally required?
The dump math: what can be sold without breaking the businessStart with the one flow the protocol hands you, whether you’re happy about it or not. Post-halving, new BTC issuance from the block subsidy is about 450 BTC per day, which is about 13,500 BTC per month.
If miners sold 100% of new issuance, that’s the clean ceiling for flow selling. In reality, miners don’t coordinate, and not all of them need to sell everything they mine. But as a thought experiment, 450 BTC/day is the maximum new supply that can hit the market without touching any pre-existing inventory.
Now bring in inventory, because that’s what the scary headlines point at. We'll rely on Glassnode’s estimate that miners have around 50,000 BTC on hand. A 50,000 BTC stockpile sounds large until you turn it into a time series. Spread across 60 days, 10% of that inventory is 5,000 BTC, which is about 83 BTC/day. Spread across 90 days, 30% is 15,000 BTC, which is about 167 BTC/day.
That’s the basic shape of miner forced distribution in a stress window: flow selling does most of the work, and inventory selling adds a smaller but still meaningful amount, unless the stress is severe enough that inventory becomes the primary tool.
So let’s put three price paths under the toy model: $90,000, $80,000, $70,000. Then tie them to three middle-ground regimes that map to how miners behave when margins get thin.
In the base case, miners sell half of the issuance and touch no inventory. That’s 225 BTC/day. Over 60 days, that’s 13,500 BTC of issuance in total times 50%, so 6,750 BTC. Over 90 days, 10,125 BTC.
In a conservative stress case, miners sell 100% of issuance and also sell 10% of inventory over 60 days. That’s 450 BTC/day from issuance plus 83 BTC/day from inventory, about 533 BTC/day total.
In a severe stress case, miners sell 100% of issuance and sell 30% of inventory over 90 days. That’s 450 plus 167, about 617 BTC/day.
Price (USD/BTC)Horizon (days)Issuance sold %Treasury tap %Issuance sold (BTC)Treasury sold (BTC)Total sold (BTC)Avg BTC/dayAvg USD/dayETF equiv @ $500M (BTC)Miner vs ETF (BTC/day)90,0006025%10%6,7505,00011,750195.817,625,0005,556195.8 vs 5,55690,0006025%30%6,75015,00021,750362.532,625,0005,556362.5 vs 5,55690,0006050%10%13,5005,00018,500308.327,750,0005,556308.3 vs 5,55690,0006050%30%13,50015,00028,500475.042,750,0005,556475.0 vs 5,55690,00060100%10%27,0005,00032,000533.348,000,0005,556533.3 vs 5,55690,00060100%30%27,00015,00042,000700.063,000,0005,556700.0 vs 5,55690,0009025%10%10,1255,00015,125168.115,125,0005,556168.1 vs 5,55690,0009025%30%10,12515,00025,125279.225,125,0005,556279.2 vs 5,55690,0009050%10%20,2505,00025,250280.625,250,0005,556280.6 vs 5,55690,0009050%30%20,25015,00035,250391.735,250,0005,556391.7 vs 5,55690,00090100%10%40,5005,00045,500505.645,500,0005,556505.6 vs 5,55690,00090100%30%40,50015,00055,500616.755,500,0005,556616.7 vs 5,55680,0006025%10%6,7505,00011,750195.815,666,6676,250195.8 vs 6,25080,0006025%30%6,75015,00021,750362.529,000,0006,250362.5 vs 6,25080,0006050%10%13,5005,00018,500308.324,666,6676,250308.3 vs 6,25080,0006050%30%13,50015,00028,500475.038,000,0006,250475.0 vs 6,25080,00060100%10%27,0005,00032,000533.342,666,6676,250533.3 vs 6,25080,00060100%30%27,00015,00042,000700.056,000,0006,250700.0 vs 6,25080,0009025%10%10,1255,00015,125168.113,450,0006,250168.1 vs 6,25080,0009025%30%10,12515,00025,125279.222,333,3336,250279.2 vs 6,25080,0009050%10%20,2505,00025,250280.622,450,0006,250280.6 vs 6,25080,0009050%30%20,25015,00035,250391.731,333,3336,250391.7 vs 6,25080,00090100%10%40,5005,00045,500505.640,500,0006,250505.6 vs 6,25080,00090100%30%40,50015,00055,500616.749,333,3336,250616.7 vs 6,25070,0006025%10%6,7505,00011,750195.813,708,3337,143195.8 vs 7,14370,0006025%30%6,75015,00021,750362.525,375,0007,143362.5 vs 7,14370,0006050%10%13,5005,00018,500308.321,583,3337,143308.3 vs 7,14370,0006050%30%13,50015,00028,500475.033,250,0007,143475.0 vs 7,14370,00060100%10%27,0005,00032,000533.337,333,3337,143533.3 vs 7,14370,00060100%30%27,00015,00042,000700.049,000,0007,143700.0 vs 7,14370,0009025%10%10,1255,00015,125168.111,766,6677,143168.1 vs 7,14370,0009025%30%10,12515,00025,125279.219,542,5007,143279.2 vs 7,14370,0009050%10%20,2505,00025,250280.619,642,0007,143280.6 vs 7,14370,0009050%30%20,25015,00035,250391.727,417,5007,143391.7 vs 7,14370,00090100%10%40,5005,00045,500505.635,392,0007,143505.6 vs 7,14370,00090100%30%40,50015,00055,500616.743,167,5007,143616.7 vs 7,143Those are the upper-bound sketches that answer a narrower question: what does the market allow?
To understand how much the market would notice, we'll use the simplest comparator readers already understand: ETF flow days, measured in BTC-equivalent. ETF outflows are only around 2.5% of BTC-denominated AUM, about $4.5 billion, and CryptoSlate previously described them as more technical than conviction-driven. You don’t even need to litigate motive to use the comparison, because the point is scale.
At $90,000 per coin, a $100 million day is about 1,111 BTC. At $80,000, it’s 1,250 BTC. At $70,000, it’s about 1,429 BTC. Suddenly, the miner numbers look less like a monster under the bed and more like something you can place on the same shelf as flows the market digests all the time.
A severe miner distribution sketch, say 600 BTC/day, is roughly half of a $100 million ETF day at $90,000. That can still move price if it’s dumped into thin books, or if liquidity is fragile on a weekend, or if it clusters into a few ugly hours. But the brute-force story of miners flooding the market runs into two ceilings: the issuance and the finite inventory that miners are willing and able to liquidate.
There’s also the execution detail that matters more than people want it to. A lot of miner selling is not a market order slapped into the public order book. It can be routed through OTC desks, structured as forward sales, or handled as part of broader treasury management. That doesn't erase selling pressure, but it changes how it prints on the tape. When people expect a visible waterfall and get a slow grind, the effect on the market is dampened.
So what would turn this from an orderly drip into something uglier? It would certainly require more than just the price dropping below ASIC. The trigger is when the financing layer takes over the decision. If a miner needs to defend a liquidity minimum, meet collateral terms, or handle a refinancing wall in bad market conditions, then inventory turns from optional to necessary.
That’s the sober answer to the viral question. Even when stress is on, and the ribbon is inverted, there are real limits to what miners can dump in a month or a quarter. If you want a practical ceiling, the thought experiment keeps pulling you back to the same zone: a few hundred BTC per day in mild stress, and something like 500 to 650 BTC per day in harsh stress windows that include inventory taps, with the exact number hinging on power terms and debt constraints you can plug in later.
And if you’re trying to guess what moves the tape, the punchline is annoyingly unromantic. The market tends to care less about the narrative label on a seller and more about the cadence, the venue, and the surrounding liquidity. Miners can add weight to a down week, but the idea that they have an infinite trapdoor under price does not survive contact with the balance sheet.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:484mo ago
Tether Plans AI-enhanced Crypto Wallet for Major Tokens
Immediate implications focus on Tether’s venture into AI integration within crypto wallets, indicating a strategic shift toward enhanced digital asset accessibility.The wallet development hints at broader cryptocurrency support but currently centers on these primary tokens.Community and market responses remain speculative, with no official remarks from high-profile figures or institutions.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino announced the development of a mobile cryptocurrency wallet integrating AI, supporting Bitcoin, USDT, USAT, and XAUT, leveraging tools like WDK and QVAC.
This new development targets enhanced utility and security, potentially impacting Bitcoin and Tether’s asset adoption, amid keen interest in AI-enhanced financial tools.
Tether Develops AI-Driven Wallet for Major Cryptos
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino announced the development of a mobile cryptocurrency wallet featuring AI integration. The wallet will support Bitcoin, USDT, USAT, and XAUT. Tether is currently seeking a Chief Software Engineer to spearhead this initiative.
Tether has initiated development on a mobile cryptocurrency wallet, incorporating AI functionalities through QVAC, an open-source decentralized platform. The wallet, announced by Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, intends to support Bitcoin, USDT, USAT, and XAUT tokens.
It appears that you’re requesting a compilation of quotes from primary sources regarding Tether’s recent announcements, particularly from the CEO, Paolo Ardoino. However, based on your description, it seems that only secondary news sources are available, and these do not provide direct quotations or links to primary sources. Therefore, I will reference the sources you’ve mentioned and format the response according to your specifications while noting the absence of actual quotes.
Exploring Tether’s AI Integration and Market Impact
Did you know? In previous technological expansions, Tether’s aim to launch tokenized assets initiated widespread adoption and accessibility improvements across traditional and digital financial sectors.
Bitcoin (BTC) remains a dominant force, priced at $88,397.04 with a $1.76 trillion market cap, as recorded by CoinMarketCap. Bitcoin’s trading volume increased 24.33%, and the market dominance stands at 59.07% despite notable price fluctuations over extended periods.
Bitcoin(BTC), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 22:43 UTC on December 21, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap
Insights from the Coincu research team emphasize the potential financial and regulatory challenges in integrating AI within cryptocurrency wallets. Historical trends suggest that technological adoption may hinge on both consumer trust and regulatory clarifications.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
Rate this post
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 18:004mo ago
Bitcoin underperforms SPX, yet Saylor doubles down – Here's why
This cycle has really put fundamentals back in the spotlight.
On the price side, the crypto market has been all over the place.
The result? The Fear and Greed Index showed market confidence rattling, swinging continuously between “extreme fear” and the broader fear zone.
Notably, that shake-up has created a clear divergence.
On the charts, Bitcoin [BTC] showed a loss of strength versus risk-on and legacy assets. For instance, the S&P500 [SPX] was up 2.18% QTD, while BTC sat at -22%, only 7% away from erasing last quarter’s gains.
Source: TradingView (BTC/USDT)
In this setup, Michael Saylor’s take starts to click.
In a recent interview, he said Bitcoin’s “fundamentals are strong this year.” According to AMBCrypto, that’s a big deal.
It showed the heavy hitters were still backing BTC, not for its short-term swings, but for the fundamentals.
Notably, MicroStrategy (MSTR) has added 31k BTC this quarter, staying firm on its stance. Could this mark a new era in how the market handles FUD, with Bitcoin’s fundamentals becoming the true driver of its value?
Saylor positions Bitcoin as the next-gen store of value
Looking ahead, MSTR’s Bitcoin roadmap is clearly future-focused.
From Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven financial models and upgraded digital gold plans to regulatory easing and quantum FUD, Saylor sees the company snapping up 5-7% of BTC supply over the next few years.
Notably, the core of this conviction rests on two key factors: Bitcoin’s growing tokenization and regulatory clarity. Saylor sees these as the main drivers likely to push BTC’s institutional adoption to new highs.
Source: Coin Metrics
The 2025 Coin Metrics report backs this thesis.
Looking at the chart above, the market cap of wrapped Bitcoin across chains has quintupled since January 2023. In fact, the two largest tokens (WBTC and cbBTC) now account for a combined 172,130 BTC.
In other words, tokenized Bitcoin has surged this year, strengthening its DeFi footprint by tapping into the power of other L1 blockchains. Given this trend, Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin strategy starts to make complete sense.
As a result, with fundamentals getting stronger, institutional appetite for BTC could just be kicking off, and MicroStrategy’s bold moves may set the tone for other Bitcoin heavyweights to follow.
Final Thoughts
Despite market volatility, Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy continue to back Bitcoin based on fundamentals, adding 31k BTC this quarter.
With tokenized Bitcoin surging and regulatory clarity improving, Bitcoin’s fundamentals are strengthening, setting the stage for broader institutional participation.
Ritika Gupta is a Financial Journalist and Geopolitical Analyst at AMBCrypto, specializing in the critical intersection of world politics, economic policy, and the cryptocurrency markets. Her analysis is informed by her distinguished background, which includes professional experience at major news network.
She holds a Bachelor's degree in Political Science and Psychology from Gargi College, University of Delhi. This academic training provides her with a sophisticated framework for dissecting complex issues such as international regulations, government fiscal policies, and the geopolitical forces that directly influence asset valuations.
At AMBCrypto, Ritika applies this expert lens to synthesize macroeconomic data and political developments, offering readers a deeper context for market movements. She excels at explaining not just what is happening in the market, but why it is happening. Her work is dedicated to providing strategic insights that empower readers to understand the complex relationship between global events and their digital assets.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 18:114mo ago
BNB Chain Quietly Reaches Infrastructure Maturity After 2025 Upgrades
BNB Chain spent 2025 strengthening the parts of the network most users never see.
According to developer updates and on-chain metrics from Messari, improvements in execution speed, block construction, and MEV handling reshaped how the chain operates at a fundamental level.
Rather than a single headline upgrade, progress came from coordinated changes across the stack.
Execution Performance Improves At The Client Level
A key technical step was the alpha deployment of the Reth execution client. The new client reduced synchronization times and lowered latency, easing the load on validators and node operators. Faster execution translated into smoother block processing and more consistent network performance.
These gains addressed long-standing efficiency bottlenecks rather than adding new features.
Infrastructure maturity on BNB Chain stood out in 2025:
🔸 Reth client alpha launched with faster syncs and lower latency
🔸 99.8% of blocks used the Builder API
🔸 Sandwich attacks fell by more than 95% through MEV protections
— BNB Chain Developers (@BNBChainDevs) December 21, 2025
Block Production Becomes Standardized
By late 2025, block construction on BNB Chain converged around a single method. Nearly 99.8% of blocks were produced via the Builder API, marking near-total adoption. This shift reduced fragmentation in block assembly and introduced greater predictability into how transactions are ordered and included.
Standardization also laid the groundwork for more effective MEV controls.
MEV Management Replaces MEV Chaos
MEV activity did not disappear in 2025. It became structured. Following the rollout of BEP-322, MEV-aware block production surged, rising 136.1% in Q3 alone. At the same time, one of the most harmful outcomes of uncontrolled MEV, sandwich attacks, collapsed by over 95%.
The data shows a clear distinction. MEV extraction increased, but user harm declined sharply. This reflects improved coordination between builders and validators rather than simple suppression.
What The Metrics Actually Show
Taken together, the numbers point to a network that learned how to manage complexity. Faster clients improved baseline execution. Unified block building reduced inefficiency. MEV protections shifted extraction away from retail traders.
This is not about eliminating adversarial behavior. It is about containing it.
Why This Matters Going Forward
Infrastructure maturity is often invisible during bull markets and critical during stress. With most blocks now built through a common API and MEV risks substantially reduced, BNB Chain enters the next cycle with stronger technical guarantees than in prior years.
The 2025 upgrades signal a transition. BNB Chain is moving from rapid expansion toward operational stability, a prerequisite for long-term DeFi sustainability and network credibility.
Author
Alexander Zdravkov
Reporter at CoinsPress
Alexander Zdravkov interessiert sich leidenschaftlich für Bedeutungsfragen. Er ist seit mehr als drei Jahren im Kryptobereich tätig und hat ein Auge dafür, aufkommende Trends in der Welt der digitalen Währungen aufzuspüren. Ob er nun tiefgreifende Analysen liefert oder tagesaktuell über alle Themen berichtet, sein tiefes Verständnis und seine Begeisterung für das, was er tut, macht ihn zu einer wertvollen Ergänzung für das CoinsPress-Team.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 18:184mo ago
Tether's Plan for AI-Integrated Mobile Wallet Remains Unconfirmed
Tether’s potential move to AI-integrated wallets is not confirmed by official sources.Market reactions and rumors have influenced Bitcoin’s volatility.Clear communication is crucial for technology development and user trust.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino announced on social media the development of a mobile cryptocurrency wallet featuring AI capabilities, supporting Bitcoin, USDT, USAT, and XAUT with QVAC integration.
The potential AI wallet enhances Tether’s market position and innovation with cryptocurrency adoption, despite no primary source validating Ardoino’s announcement or market reaction confirmation.
Tether’s AI Wallet: Reports and Market Implications
“Paolo Ardoino, CEO, Tether, stated that ‘Tether is looking to hire for the development of an AI-integrated mobile wallet.'”
Rumors about Tether’s AI wallet plans incited mixed reactions. Community sentiment expressed skepticism, available only through secondary sources. High-profile industry figures did not comment, reflecting cautious industry responsiveness.
Bitcoin (BTC) maintains a strong presence in the market with a current price of $88,551.20 as of December 21, 2025, according to CoinMarketCap. Holding a market cap of $1.77 trillion, bitcoin commands 58.96% dominance. Recent 30-day analysis by Coincu Research highlights a 5.02% decrease, pointing to ongoing volatility.
Bitcoin’s Market Dominance Amid Speculative Reports
Did you know? Rumored news such as Tether’s alleged AI moves can often spark volatility and speculation, similar to past instances when unconfirmed reports affected market perception momentarily.
Coincu researchers emphasize the importance of clear communication in technology developments. The potential AI wallet impacts regulatory, technological, and financial outcomes. Clarity in deployment could significantly influence Tether’s market position and integration efforts.
Bitcoin(BTC), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 23:12 UTC on December 21, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap
Bitcoin (BTC) maintains a strong presence in the market with a current price of $88,551.20 as of December 21, 2025, according to CoinMarketCap. Holding a market cap of $1.77 trillion, bitcoin commands 58.96% dominance. Recent 30-day analysis by Coincu Research highlights a 5.02% decrease, pointing to ongoing volatility.
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.
One of these cryptocurrencies is a major global asset. The other has a cartoon dog as a mascot.
Bitcoin (BTC +0.17%) and Shiba Inu (SHIB 2.06%) are two of the most popular cryptocurrencies, and both have been millionaire makers for early investors.
That's where the similarities end. In most respects, these cryptocurrencies are polar opposites, including their prospects as investments.
Image source: Getty Images.
Bitcoin is the clear choice over Shiba Inu
While there are millions of cryptocurrencies, it's a top-heavy market that's dominated by Bitcoin. Bitcoin has been the largest cryptocurrency from the beginning, and its $1.7 trillion market cap makes up nearly 60% of the entire crypto market (as of Dec. 18).
One of Bitcoin's key features is a hard cap of 21 million coins. This built-in scarcity has helped turn it into a digital store of value used by individuals, companies, and institutional investors.
Shiba Inu has a maximum supply, as well -- but of nearly 590 trillion SHIB tokens, not what anyone would consider scarce. It also hasn't been a reliable source of value. Shiba Inu's price skyrocketed in 2021, but since then, it has lost over 90% of its value. As a meme coin, Shiba Inu is a speculative asset without any legitimate value.
Today's Change
(
0.17
%) $
146.86
Current Price
$
88495.00
Bitcoin is highly volatile, but it has been the most resilient cryptocurrency, recovering from every bear market. Although Bitcoin experienced an extended downturn starting in 2021, it rebounded and set new all-time highs in 2024 and 2025.
If you're going to invest in cryptocurrency, Bitcoin is worth having in your portfolio, considering how important it is to the market. Shiba Inu is better off avoiding, as there's no reason to expect its value will increase going forward.
Lyle Daly has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 18:304mo ago
Ethereum's Glamsterdam Upgrade Takes Shape as 2026 Target Comes Into Focus
Ethereum developers are preparing the network's next major upgrade, known as Glamsterdam, with early plans pointing to a rollout in the first half of 2026 as technical details continue to be debated.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 18:394mo ago
Cardano's Midnight Token Hits New All-Time High Amid a 50% Rally
Midnight has extended its sharp rally as strong investor demand pushed the token to a new all-time high. The project associated with Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson continues to attract attention after sustaining upside momentum.
While NIGHT has already delivered outsized gains, technical and macro signals suggest additional upside potential remains.
Sponsored
Sponsored
Midnight Holders Are Watching A New SunriseInvestor support for NIGHT remains firm. The Chaikin Money Flow sits in positive territory above the zero line, confirming net inflows. Although the indicator dipped slightly over the past 48 hours, capital continues entering the asset, signaling ongoing confidence rather than distribution.
Much of this demand is linked to Midnight’s association with Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano. That connection has boosted credibility and visibility.
In the short term, this narrative-driven interest is likely to keep capital rotating into NIGHT, supporting elevated price levels.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
NIGHT CMF. Source: TradingViewSponsored
Sponsored
Macro conditions also favor NIGHT’s performance. The token shows a weak correlation with Bitcoin, insulating it from broader market uncertainty. This independence has allowed NIGHT to trend higher even as Bitcoin struggles to regain momentum.
Low correlation often benefits emerging assets during periods of BTC consolidation. With Bitcoin lacking a clear recovery signal, NIGHT’s ability to move on its own fundamentals remains a key advantage. This dynamic could continue supporting relative outperformance in the near term.
NIGHT Correlation To Bitcoin. Source: TradingViewNIGHT Price Forms New All-Time HighMidnight price surged 42.7% over the past 24 hours, trading near $0.093 at the time of writing. The rally resulted in a new intraday all-time high of $0.096. Momentum remains strong, reflecting aggressive buying and sustained interest following the breakout.
Bullish sentiment and favorable macro conditions support further upside. If current trends persist, NIGHT could push beyond the $0.100 level. Entering the 10-cent range would mark a psychological milestone, potentially drawing additional speculative interest and reinforcing momentum.
NIGHT Price Analysis. Source: TradingViewRisks remain if holders begin taking profits. A wave of selling could pull NIGHT back toward the $0.075 support. Losing that level would weaken the bullish structure. Further downside could extend to $0.060, invalidating the current bullish thesis and increasing volatility.
Who holds the power in XRP? Lately, institutional money has moved in, and big wallets are also trying to take control again. And get this! This is all happening with price action that isn’t anything to write home about.
Here’s what you need to know.
ETFs set the tone
Spot XRP ETFs’ inflows have pushed total net assets past $1.2 billion. Even on mellow days, inflows have remained positive. The interest looks extremely consistent (though muted), rather than like a one-off spike.
Source: SoSoValue
The trend is interesting, though. Even with the big streak of green, Ripple’s [XRP] price has held near $1.90 instead of reacting impulsively. That’s a big buying sign, with institutions building exposure gradually to set a base.
Whales have some skin in the game
Santiment data indicated that wallets holding between 100 million and 1 billion XRP have begun increasing their share again. Whale supply has climbed back toward the 12.8% range after a brief decline earlier this month.
Source: Santiment
The move hasn’t been gradual. After dipping in mid-December, large-holder ownership spiked, so holding isn’t passive. They’re positioning.
When whales step in alongside institutional inflows, it means market control is shifting hands.
XRP is trying to steady itself
At the time of writing, XRP traded near $1.94, still below its key exponential moving averages (EMAs). The 20, 50, 100 and 200-day EMAs remained overhead, so the greater trend hadn’t yet flipped bullish.
Source: TradingView
That hesitation is visible in the momentum as well.
RSI was at around 43, with mild recovery but no strong buying pressure. OBV has also flattened after falling earlier in the month.
That means selling has reduced with no new demand. The MACD was below zero, too, though downside momentum appeared to be slowing.
Final Thoughts
XRP price is flat near $1.90, but $1.2B+ in ETF assets and rising whale supply mean holders aren’t deterred.
Control is shifting, even without a price breakout.
2025-12-22 00:124mo ago
2025-12-21 19:014mo ago
Crypto Market Prediction: Shiba Inu (SHIB) Back in 2023, XRP Can Take $2 Back Already, Is Bitcoin (BTC) Reversal Guaranteed?
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
The market might take another recovery attempt sooner than anticipated. Unfortunately though, there are not many upside possibilities for XRP, SHIB or even BTC. On Monday we will see a spike in institutional and retail presence, which should give us a heads-up for the upcoming week.
Shiba Inu goes back in timeIn a sense, Shiba Inu is trading backward. Following several unsuccessful attempts at recovery in 2024 and 2025, SHIB has returned to levels last observed in 2023, erasing a full year of speculative gains. That alone is a warning sign, but the structure beneath it exacerbates the problem.
SHIB/USDT Chart by TradingViewFrom the perspective of pure price action, SHIB is stuck in a long-term decline. On the daily chart, every significant moving average is sloping downward, and the price remains well below all of them. Attempts to recover short-term resistance have been feeble and fleeting, consistently encountering sell pressure. There is a steady, gradual distribution with no indication of accumulation.
HOT Stories
Volume confirms this. Upside candles lack follow-through, while spikes almost always occur on downward movements. Returning to 2023 levels matters because it alters market perception. Anyone who bought dips in 2024 or 2025 is now underwater, creating overhead supply across the entire range above the current price. Any bounce is more likely to be sold into than chased.
Practically speaking, for SHIB to absorb that supply would require a structural catalyst rather than a tweet or a burn headline. None are apparent. This is further supported by the RSI holding in the low 40s. That is not an oversold panic bottom, but a weak market slowly declining. Without capitulation to signal an end, these trends are the hardest to reverse.
The recovery narrative is effectively invalidated by a return to 2023 pricing, which is the larger issue. The speculative moment for SHIB has already occurred. Since then, the token has failed to establish a higher low on a macro time frame, liquidity has declined and relative performance against majors has declined. That is erosion, not consolidation. Demand would need to be strong enough to overcome years of stagnant supply for any recovery to be sustainable.
XRP's chance to stabilizeIt appears that XRP has finally stopped bleeding. The price has begun to stabilize and push back above $1.90 after weeks of declining inside a descending channel, printing a significant green daily candle. This is not an isolated bounce; it is occurring at the point where downward momentum has run out.
Since October, XRP has adhered to a distinct bearish channel. Sellers are no longer driving prices lower, which is the key change. The most recent push higher was accompanied by cleaner participation, while volume on down candles has diminished. That is typically the first indication that short-term positioning is crowded on the wrong side and that distribution is coming to an end.
You Might Also Like
The $2 level now serves as the pivot. It is more than a round number. During the most recent sell-off, XRP repeatedly faltered here, flipping from support to resistance. A reclaim of $2 would place the price back above the lower bound of the broken structure and pose a threat to the mid-range of the broader consolidation. Put simply, rallies are sold below $2, and sellers become uneasy above it.
There is also a psychological element. Earlier in the cycle, XRP spent significant time above $2. When it fell below that level, forced exits and momentum unwinds followed. If the price returns there, those same participants are more likely to reenter rather than exit. That reflexive behavior can create upside pressure, particularly if shorts lean into resistance too early.
Momentum indicators support this view. RSI has moved out of weak territory without entering overbought conditions, which is exactly what you want to see in the early stages of a potential reversal. This is stabilization, not euphoria.
None of this guarantees a straight move higher. Follow-through is required to confirm the move, as XRP still faces notable overhead supply between $2.10 and $2.40. That said, sellers are no longer able to extract easy profits from the market, which materially changes the dynamic.
Bitcoin is not sleepingFollowing a steep decline that destroyed weeks of upward momentum, Bitcoin is attempting to regain its footing. Price is currently well below the psychological $100,000 level that dominated narratives earlier in the cycle, hovering in the high $80,000s. From a structural perspective, this market is in repair mode rather than a clear uptrend.
You Might Also Like
The daily chart tells the story clearly. BTC broke through former support near $100,000, lost its short- and midterm moving averages and accelerated lower on rising volume. As late longs were forced out and leverage was flushed, the price stabilized instead of continuing to cascade. That said, stabilization is not the same thing as a confirmed reversal.
Bitcoin is still trading below key resistance between $93,000 and $100,000. A rally into that zone will not be a free pass higher. It will be a test of conviction. Bulls must reclaim and hold those levels, otherwise upside attempts are simply relief bounces within a broader corrective structure.
Momentum indicators reflect the same uncertainty. RSI has rebounded from oversold conditions but remains muted, signaling that selling pressure has eased while genuine bullish strength has yet to return. This aligns with a market either waiting for a trigger or setting up for another leg lower.
Sentiment data reinforces this caution. On the regulated prediction market Kalshi, traders are not pricing in a rapid return to $100,000. Current odds imply that a move back to six figures is unlikely in the near term. That does not mean $100K is off the table indefinitely, but expectations have shifted from inevitability to conditionality.
Investors are growing concerned about the increasing leverage on Oracle's balance sheet.
Oracle's (ORCL +6.63%) stock price is falling, and investors are curious about the causes.
*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of Dec. 17, 2025. The video was published on Dec. 19, 2025.
Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 16:454mo ago
TQQQ and SSO Aim for Above-Average Returns, But There's a Clear Winner for Investors
Explore how sector concentration and volatility set these leveraged ETFs apart for tactical investors seeking amplified exposure.
The ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF (TQQQ +3.90%) differs from the ProShares Ultra S&P 500 ETF (SSO +1.77%) by offering higher leverage, greater tech exposure, and notably higher volatility.
Both funds pursue leveraged daily returns, with SSO aiming for 2x the S&P 500 and TQQQ targeting 3x the Nasdaq-100. This matchup spotlights two aggressive ETFs for short-term traders or tactical investors seeking amplified index exposure, but their risk profiles and sector tilts diverge sharply.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSSOTQQQIssuerProSharesProSharesExpense ratio0.87%0.82%1-yr return (as of Dec. 16, 2025))16.36%16.60%Dividend yield0.69%0.72%Beta (5Y monthly)2.023.69AUM$7.3 billion$30.9 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
TQQQ offers advantages for both fee-conscious and income-driven investors, with a lower expense ratio and higher yield. However, both of these factors primarily impact long-term investors, and these particular leveraged ETFs are best suited as short-term investments.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricSSOTQQQMax drawdown (5 y)-46.73%-81.65%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,585$2,459TQQQ’s 3x leverage has driven stronger one-year gains, but its five-year max drawdown is nearly double SSO’s, highlighting much greater downside risk. Over the past five years, both ETFs roughly doubled an initial $1,000, but SSO did so with less severe declines.
What's insideTQQQ seeks to deliver 3x the daily returns of the Nasdaq-100, making it highly concentrated in technology (55% of the fund's total assets), with additional weight in communication services (17%) and consumer cyclicals (13%).
The fund holds 101 stocks, with its largest stakes in Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. Its daily leverage reset and tech-heavy focus mean sharp swings and the potential for rapid losses if tech underperforms.
SSO, by contrast, offers 2x daily exposure to the S&P 500, spreading risk across a broader universe of 503 holdings. Its top holdings mirror those of TQQQ, but SSO’s sector mix is more diversified with technology making up 35% of the fund, financials at 13%, and consumer cyclical at 11%. Both funds use a daily leverage reset, which can erode returns if held long-term and volatility spikes.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsSSO and TQQQ are both high-risk, high-reward ETFs. They're designed to earn above-average returns, but SOO has been the stronger performer.
TQQQ is the higher risk of the two funds, with its 3x daily leverage and heavy tilt toward the technology industry. This ETF has the potential to substantially outperform SSO, but in recent years, that risk hasn't paid off. TQQQ's one- and five-year total returns are nearly identical to SSO's, despite this ETF experiencing much more severe volatility -- with a higher beta and a max drawdown nearly double that of SSO.
Now, this doesn't mean SSO is not a risky investment. All leveraged ETFs will carry greater risk, especially if held long-term. But SSO tracks the S&P 500 and only aims for 2x the daily returns of the index, which results in greater diversification and milder price fluctuations.
If you're considering investing in either of these ETFs, be prepared for substantial ups and downs. But between the two funds, TQQQ has struggled with volatility over the last few years with little payoff.
GlossaryExpense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges to cover operating costs.
Leverage: The use of borrowed money or derivatives to amplify investment returns, increasing both potential gains and losses.
ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): A fund traded on stock exchanges that holds a basket of assets, like stocks or bonds.
Drawdown: The percentage decline from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock, expressed as a percentage of its current price.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of assets that a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Sector: A group of companies or assets operating in the same segment of the economy, such as technology or financials.
Daily leverage reset: The process by which leveraged ETFs adjust their exposure each day to maintain a set leverage ratio.
Nasdaq-100: An index of 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
S&P 500: An index tracking the 500 largest publicly traded companies in the United States.
Consumer cyclicals: Companies whose performance tends to follow economic cycles, like retailers, automakers, and travel firms.
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:004mo ago
VOO vs. VOOG: Is S&P 500 Diversification or Tech-Focused Growth the Better Choice for Investors?
VOOG has delivered higher one-year and five-year total returns, but with deeper drawdowns and more volatility than VOO. VOO is broader, more diversified, and offers a higher dividend yield at a lower expense ratio.
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:184mo ago
Is LULU Stock a Buy After the CEO Announced His Resignation?
CEO Calvin McDonald is stepping down in January. New leadership could help the stock rebound.
Calvin McDonald's nearly seven-year tenure as the chief executive officer of Lululemon Athletica (LULU 2.63%) can be compared to a pair of luxury yoga pants that don't quite fit: Uncomfortable at best, and an expensive mistake at worst. McDonald will step down from the company's helm at the end of January 2026, and, thus far, the stock has responded positively to this announced change in leadership. Shares of Lululemon surged more than 6.5% from the announcement as of close on Dec. 17.
Today's Change
(
-2.63
%) $
-5.66
Current Price
$
209.45
A lot of criticism and calls for change
A renewed energy is now benefiting Lululemon. Elliott Investment Management even went so far as to build its equity stake in the company to more than $1 billion after the announcement of McDonald's resignation. The private-equity fund is pushing its own candidate, former Ralph Lauren executive Jane Nielsen, to take over as CEO in the new year. The activist founder of Lululemon, Chip Wilson, has also been outspoken in his criticisms of the company, claiming that "years of bad decisions" regarding product and execution have eroded the brand and shareholder value.
Image source: Getty Images.
Lululemon stock has declined by more than 40% over the past five years. The premium athleisure retailer has struggled to maintain market share in an increasingly competitive landscape.
Lululemon needs to reclaim its cool
It's not all bad news, though. Lululemon's balance sheet is quite strong. Its revenues far exceed its debt load, and it expects to end 2025 with approximately $11 billion in net revenue.
Lululemon's stock remains attractive compared to other sports brands, such as Nike and Adidas. Lululemon has a higher earnings per share (EPS), hovering around $14, and a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 15 than both Nike and Adidas. The stock is currently trading about halfway between its 52-week low and high.
Ultimately, whether Lululemon stock is a buy now depends on execution risk. If the company and a new CEO can recapture its essence as the leader of "cool" in athleisure, a rebound in the stock could be imminent.
Catie Hogan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Nike. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:254mo ago
U.S. Coast Guard Chasing Another Tanker Involved in Shipping Venezuela Oil
The operation comes after the boarding of two other ships this month as the administration carries out Trump's order to blockade Venezuela's oil shipments
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:284mo ago
Robex Pours First Gold at Kiniéro on Schedule and Budget
Gold bar weighing 2.64 kilograms (85 oz) poured in the first smelt on site at the Kiniéro Gold Project, Guinea.First gold delivered on schedule and within budget.Nearly 5 million hours worked without a Lost Time Injury (LTI).Ramp-up progressing smoothly; plant achieving recoveries in line with expectations.Kiniéro plant expected to reach nameplate capacity in early Q1 CY2026.Open-pit mining ramping up from South Sabali starter pit, with ore stockpiles continuing to build on the ROM pad.Matthew Wilcox appointed Managing Director & CEO in May 2024; construction team mobilised July 2024. Construction completed in 17 months—the team’s sixth successful build in 15 years, all delivered on time and on budget.Robex secures exclusive option to buy back and fully extinguish the Mansounia royalties.Kiniéro becomes Robex’s second producing asset, alongside Nampala in Mali (guidance of 46,000 to 48,000 oz/year).Successful delivery of Kiniéro by the Robex team underscores the compelling rationale for the proposed merger with Predictive Discovery ahead of construction of its Bankan Gold Project, Guinea, located within 25km of Kiniéro.The proposed merger will create West Africa’s next tier-1 gold mining hub, combining Kiniéro and Bankan with projected 400koz+ annual production by 2029 and combined resources of ~9.5Moz Au.
Figure 1: Robex construction team with Managing Director & CEO Matthew Wilcox and Chief Financial Officer Alain William celebrating the first gold pour at Kiniero.
QUEBEC CITY, Dec. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- West African gold producer and developer Robex Resources Inc (“Robex” or the “Company”) (ASX: RXR | TSX-V: RBX) is pleased to report it has poured first gold on schedule and within budget at its Kiniéro Gold Project (“Kiniéro”) in Guinea, West Africa.
Robex’s Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer Matthew Wilcox said:
“This is a major milestone for Robex, and every member of our team should be proud of what we have accomplished together at Kiniéro. Completing construction and commencing gold production is the culmination of 17 months of dedication and hard work, delivered safely and responsibly with nearly 5 million hours worked without a lost time injury.
Pouring first gold at Kiniéro reflects the calibre of our people, the strength of our execution and is the sixth successful build in the last 15 years by this construction team, all on time and on budget. This exceptional track record, combined with recent Guinea construction experience, gives us absolute confidence that this is the best team in the industry right now to bring Bankan into production and deliver another world-class West African gold project.
We are looking forward to completing our merger with Predictive, and the combined company is positioned to become West Africa’s next mid-tier gold producer and establish a tier-1 gold mining hub in Guinea.”
Operational Update
Commissioning activities at Kiniéro’s processing plant are progressing in line with expectations. Mechanical, electrical, and instrumentation systems are performing to design specifications.Ore delivery to the mill commenced earlier this month, and the plant is achieving recoveries consistent with feasibility study assumptions.Open-pit mining has ramped up at the South Sabali starter pit, with drilling and blasting underway and ore stockpiles building on the ROM pad.These activities will support a smooth transition to commercial production, targeted for Q1 CY2026.
Figure 2: Aerial View of the Kiniéro Gold Project – Ore Delivered to Train A CIL Tanks
Operational Activities at the Kiniéro Gold Project:
Figure 3: Haulage Operations at Kiniéro Site
Figure 4: Ore Feed to Saprolite Crusher
Figure 5: First Ore Processed through Saprolite Crusher
Figure 6: Material Delivered to the Mill Circuit
Figure 7: Train A CIL Tanks Gold Processing
Figure 8: Water Treatment Facility
Mansounia Royalty Buyback – Penta Goldfields Company
Robex has secured an exclusive option to buy back and extinguish the Mansounia royalty, which currently stands at:
3% NSR for the first 150,000 oz of gold produced from the Mansounia exploitation permits,3.25% NSR for 150,000–300,000 oz,3.5% NSR for production above 300,000 oz.
Under the executed agreement:
Robex paid a US$1 million non-refundable option fee.Upon exercise, Robex will pay US$5 million in cash plus US$15 million in equity to fully extinguish the royalty. Oragem Royalty
In addition, Robex has secured an exclusive option to buy back and extinguish the Oragem Royalty, which currently stands at 0.5% NSR from the Mansounia permit.
Robex has paid a non-refundable option fee of US$250,000. Upon exercise of the option, Robex will pay US$3.5 million in cash to fully extinguish the Oragem Royalty.
Conditions precedent
The options to buy back and extinguish the Mansounia Royalties are subject to conditions precedent, notably the grant of Mansounia exploitation permits, and will remain valid until the Permit Long Stop Date (10 years from execution).
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
This announcement was approved by the Managing Director.
Robex Resources Inc.
Matthew Wilcox, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Alain William, Chief Financial Officer
Email: [email protected]
www.robexgold.com
Investors and Media:
Michael Vaughan, Fivemark Partners
Phone: +61 422 602 720
Email: [email protected]
ABOUT ROBEX RESOURCES INC.
Robex Resources is a Canadian gold mining company listed on the TSX-V and ASX, and headquartered in Quebec, Canada. Robex’s material properties consist of the Nampala Project in Mali and the Kiniero Project in Guinea.
Not an Offer
No securities regulatory authority has either approved or disapproved of the contents of this news release. This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the securities in the United States or any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. The securities being offered have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and such securities may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons absent registration or an applicable exemption from U.S. registration requirements and applicable U.S. state securities laws.
Forward-looking Statements
This announcement contains certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities legislation (collectively “Forward-looking Information”). These include statements regarding future outlook and anticipated events, such as the consummation and timing of the Transaction and the satisfaction of the closing conditions under the Arrangement Agreement; the timing of the Meeting and of the Revised Proxy Deadline and Revised CDI VIF Deadline; the filing and delivery of the Addendum, press release and any other ancillary materials; pro forma ownership of the Combined Company; and future plans, projections, objectives, estimates and forecasts and the timing related thereto. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address circumstances, events, activities or developments that could or may or will occur are Forward-looking Information. Forward-looking Information is generally identified by the use of words like “will”, “create”, “enhance”, “improve”, “potential”, “expect”, “upside”, “growth”, “estimate”, “anticipate” and similar expressions and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, or “should”, or the negative or grammatical variations of such terms, are intended to identify Forward-looking Information. Although Robex believes that the expectations reflected in the Forward-looking Information are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on Forward- looking Information since no assurance can be provided that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking Information is based on information available at the time those statements are made and/or good faith belief of the officers and directors of Robex as of that time with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the Forward-looking Information. Forward-looking Information involves numerous risks and uncertainties. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, risks related to the closing of the Arrangement, changes in commodity prices, foreign exchange fluctuations and general economic conditions, increased costs and demand for production inputs, the speculative nature of exploration and project development, including the risks of obtaining necessary approvals, licenses and permits and diminishing quantities or grades of reserves, political and social risks (including, but not limited to, in Guinea, Ivory Coast, Mali and West Africa more broadly), changes to the legal and regulatory framework within which Robex operates or may in the future operate, environmental conditions including extreme weather conditions, recruitment and retention of personnel, industrial relations issues and litigation, as well as the risks identified in the section titled “Risk Factors” in Robex’s most recently filed Annual Information Form which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. Forward-looking Information is designed to help readers understand Robex' views as of that time with respect to future events and speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by applicable law, Robex assumes no obligation to update or to publicly announce the results of any change to any Forward-looking Information contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect actual results, future events or developments, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting the Forward-looking Information. If Robex updates any Forward-looking Information, no inference should be drawn that Robex will make additional updates with respect to such or other Forward-looking Information. All Forward-Looking Information contained in this announcement is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement.
JORC CODE AND CIM DEFINITION STANDARDS
The term “Ore Reserve” defined by the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia (“JORC Code”) is equivalent to the term “Mineral Reserve” defined by the CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves adopted by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum May 19, 2014 (“CIM Definition Standards”). “Inferred Mineral Resources”, “Indicated Mineral Resources” and “Measured Mineral Resources” have the same meaning under both the JORC Code and CIM Definition Standards. “Proved Mineral Reserves” under the JORC Code has the same meaning as “Proven Mineral Reserves” under the CIM Definition Standards, and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under the JORC Code has the same meaning as “Probable Mineral Reserves” under the CIM Definition Standards. The JORC Code is an acceptable foreign code under NI 43-101.
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserve Estimates, and Production Targets
This announcement refers to PDI and Robex having combined Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates of approximately 9.5Moz Au and approximately 4.5Moz Au respectively. Further information regarding the individual Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates of each of PDI and Robex is set out below.
PDI
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimates
The Mineral Resource estimates for the NEB and BC projects were released to ASX on 7 August 2023 in an announcement by PDI titled “Bankan Mineral Resource Increases to 5.38Moz” and the Mineral Resource estimates in respect of the Fouwagbe and Sounsoun projects were released to the ASX on 23 April 2025 in an announcement by PDI titled “Maiden Argo Mineral Resource Estimate of 153koz”. The Ore Reserve estimate in respect of the Bankan Project was released to ASX on 25 June 2025 in an announcement by PDI titled “Bankan DFS Confirms Outstanding Project Economics”. PDI confirms it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve estimates and all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed, noting that PDI intends to appeal the Argo (and Bokoro) revocations announced on 28 May 2025 in accordance with the Mining Code, and that the Argo Inferred Mineral Resources account for just 2.8% of PDI’s overall Mineral Resource.
Production Targets
The Production Targets and forecast financial information in respect of the Bankan Project were released to the ASX on 25 June 2025 in an announcement by PDI titled “Bankan DFS Confirms Outstanding Project Economics”. PDI confirms that all the material assumptions underpinning the Production Targets and forecast financial information derived from the Production Targets in the previous announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Robex
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimates
The Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates in respect of Robex’s Kiniero Project were released to ASX on 22 August 2025 in an announcement by Robex titled “Amendment to Kiniero Gold Project Technical Report”, and in respect of the Nampala Project in an ASX announcement by Robex dated 6 May 2025 titled “Replacement Prospectus”. Robex confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimates included in the relevant market announcement and all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Production Targets
The production targets and forecast financial information in respect of Robex’s Kiniero Project was released to ASX on 22 August 2025 in an announcement by Robex titled “Amendment to Kiniero Gold Project Technical Report”, and in respect of the Nampala Project in an ASX announcement by Robex dated 6 May 2025 titled “Replacement Prospectus”. Robex confirms that all the material assumptions underpinning the production targets and forecast financial information derived from the production targets in the relevant market announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed.
National Instrument 43-101
All scientific and technical information in this presentation relating to Robex has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Jeames McKibben, a Chartered Professional Fellow of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, and a “qualified person” as defined in NI 43-101.
Readers are referred to the technical report for the Nampala Project entitled “Independent Technical Report on the Nampala, Mininko, Gladie and Kamasso Permits and a Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimate of the Nampala Gold Mine, Mali, West Africa” effective September 30, 2024 (the “Nampala Technical Report), and the amended and restated technical report for the Kiniero Project entitled “Technical Report, Kiniero Gold Project, Guinea (Amended)” with an effective date of December 6, 2024, as amended and restated on June 12, 2025 (the “Kiniero Technical Report”), each of which has been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and is available on Robex’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
PDI Ore Reserve and Mineral Resource Statement
Bankan Ore Reserve Statement1,2
DepositMining MethodClassificationTonnage
(Mt)Gold Grade
(g/t Au)Contained
(Koz Au)NEBOpen PitProbable40.21.361,751UndergroundProbable7.93.951,002Total 48.11.782,753BC Open PitOpen PitProbable3.51.78200Total 3.51.78200Total Open Pit 43.71.391,951Total Underground 7.93.951,002Total Bankan Project 51.61.782,953
Bankan Mineral Resource Estimate3,4
DepositClassificationTonnage
(Mt)Gold Grade
(g/t Au)Contained
(Koz Au)NEB Open PitIndicated78.41.553,900Inferred3.10.9192Total81.41.533,993NEB UndergroundInferred6.84.07896NEB Total 88.31.724,888BC Open PitIndicated5.31.42244Inferred6.91.09243BC Total 12.21.24487NEB Area Total 100.51.665,376FouwagbeInferred2.21.68119SounsounInferred0.91.1934Argo Area Total 3.11.54153Total Bankan Project 103.61.665,528
Robex Mineral Reserve and Resource Statement
Kiniero Mineral Reserve and Resource Statement5,6
DepositTonnage
(Mt)Gold Grade
(g/t Au)Contained
(Moz Au)Probable Jean4.21.530.20SGA5.11.520.25SGD3.41.340.14Sabali South7.40.890.21Sabali North and Central1.50.960.05Mansounia17.70.810.46Stockpiles6.30.480.10Total45.50.971.41Indicated SGA12.11.460.57Jean4.71.690.26Sabali North and Central3.71.210.14Sabali South11.10.910.32West Balan3.01.450.14Banfara0.91.000.03Mansounia Central24.00.780.60Stockpiles11.60.370.14Total71.20.962.20Inferred SGA10.61.430.49Jean2.21.470.1Sabali North and Central0.71.390.03Sabali South2.71.010.09West Balan2.01.270.08Banfara0.71.450.03Mansounia Central26.30.820.7Stockpiles0.21.310.01Total45.31.051.53
Nampala Mineral Reserve and Resource Statement7,8
Weathering TypeTonnage
(Mt)Gold Grade
(g/t Au)Contained
(Koz Au)Probable Oxide3.30.9094.6Transition0.81.0626.4Total4.00.93121.0Indicated Oxide5.90.84158.3Transition2.11.1376.0Fresh0.13.009.4Total8.00.94243.7Inferred Oxide0.30.798.1Transition0.21.628.5Fresh0.012.530.4Total0.60.9517.0 1 Refer to PDI ASX release “Bankan DFS Confirms Outstanding Project Economics” dated 25 June 2025.
2 Reserve cut-off: Open Pit 0.38-0.48 g/t Au, Underground 2.0 g/t Au.
3 Resource cut-off: NEB Open Pit indicated & inferred 0.5 g/t Au, NEB Underground inferred 2.0 g/t Au, BC Open Pit indicated and inferred 0.4 g/t Au, Fouwagbe and Sounsoun inferred 0.5 g/t Au.
4 In relation to the Fouwagbe and Sounsoun deposits (Argo Permit), PDI intends to appeal the Argo and Bokoro revocations announced on 28 May 2025 in accordance with the Mining Code. Refer to PDI ASX release “Argo and Bokoro Exploration Permits Update” dated 28 May 2025.
5 Refer to Robex announcement titled “Amendment to Kiniero Gold Project Technical Report” dated 22 August 2025 and the Kiniero Technical Report.
6 Resource/reserve cut-off grade (Resource at US$2,200/oz, reserves at US$1,800/oz): SGA, Jean and Banfara: laterite 0.3 g/t Au, saprolite (oxide) 0.3 g/t Au, saprock (transition) 0.3 g/t Au, fresh 0.4 g/t Au; Sabali South: laterite 0.3 g/t Au, mottled zone/saprolite/lower saprolite (oxide) 0.3 g/t Au, saprock (transition) 0.5 g/t Au, fresh 0.6 g/t Au; Sabali North and Central: laterite 0.3 g/t Au, saprolite (oxide) 0.3 g/t Au, saprock (transition) 0.6 g/t Au, fresh 0.6 g/t Au; West Balan: laterite 0.3 g/t Au, saprolite (oxide) 0.3 g/t Au, saprock (transition) 0.3 g/t Au, fresh 0.5 g/t Au; Stockpiles reported as Mineral Resources have been limited to those dumps which exhibit an average grade >0.3 g/t Au for the entire stockpile assuming no selectivity.
7 Refer to Robex announcement titled “Replacement Prospectus” dated 6 May 2025 and the Nampala Technical Report.
8 Resource cut-off grade (at US$2,200/oz): Laterite 0.35 g/t Au, Oxide 0.35 g/t Au, Transition 0.43 g/t Au, Fresh 1.89 g/t Au; Reserve cut-off grade (at US$1,800/oz): 0.4 g/t Au (laterite, mottled zone, saprolite and transition).
Amazon and Alphabet are two market leaders in cloud computing.
Two of the big three cloud computing companies are Alphabet (GOOGL +1.47%) (GOOG +1.55%) and Amazon (AMZN +0.21%). While both Google Cloud and AWS (Amazon Web Services) have seen solid growth, Alphabet's stock far outpaced Amazon's in 2025, climbing nearly 60% as of this writing, versus a modest gain for Amazon.
Let's look at which stock is set to outperform in 2026.
Image source: Getty Images.
The case for Alphabet
Alphabet has been one of the best-performing mega-cap tech stocks in 2025, largely because it was able to flip the script from being viewed as an AI loser to perhaps having the potential to be one of the biggest AI winners. While the company turned in some strong numbers, its performance was much more about changing perceptions.
It did this largely through the advancements with its Gemini foundational large language model (LLM) and custom artificial intelligence (AI) chips. Gemini has become one of the best LLMs in the market today, and Alphabet has infused it throughout its products, including its core search business. AI-powered features, like AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Lens, have helped the company accelerate its search revenue, while its Gemini stand-alone app has also gained traction.
Today's Change
(
1.47
%) $
4.45
Current Price
$
306.91
At the same time, its Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) have become increasingly viewed as one of the top alternative AI chips to Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs). These chips are in their seventh generation, and Alphabet uses them to power much of its internal workloads, giving it a huge structural cost advantage. Meanwhile, the chips are so highly regarded that Anthropic has committed to buying $21 billion worth of them next year.
As time progresses, the advantage Alphabet has of owning both top-notch AI chips and a top-tier LLM should only widen, as it creates a powerful flywheel that will make both better over time.
The case for Amazon
While Alphabet was able to change investor perceptions this year, Amazon was not. However, the company could now be in a similar spot to where Alphabet was heading into 2025.
Much of Amazon's lackluster recent performance can be tied to the growth of AWS, which trails that of Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. However, Amazon saw AWS revenue growth accelerate to 20% last quarter, and the company said it was capacity-constrained. As such, it's boosting its capital expenditure (capex) budget to try to meet growing demand.
Today's Change
(
0.21
%) $
0.47
Current Price
$
227.23
At the same time, the data center that it built for Anthropic, featuring its custom Trainium chips, is still ramping up. It is also in talks with OpenAI about making an investment in the company, where OpenAI would start to use some of its AI chips. The two companies already signed a $38 billion cloud computing deal, although that was to use Nvidia GPUs.
Meanwhile, Amazon's e-commerce business is really clicking. The company is seeing huge operating leverage come from its robotics and AI investments, while its high-margin sponsored ad business is growing quickly from a large base. This could be seen in its third-quarter results, as its North America revenue rose 11%, while its segment adjusted operating income soared 28%.
The verdict
Alphabet and Amazon are two of my favorite stocks heading into 2026. Both stocks are trading at attractive valuations with forward price-to-earnings ratios (P/Es) of below 30 times and solid growth prospects ahead.
Data by YCharts.
I think Alphabet is going to become one of the biggest winners in AI over the long term, but for 2026, I think Amazon's stock can outperform. As AWS revenue continues to accelerate and Trainium gains some traction, Amazon can begin to shift perceptions, much like Alphabet did last year. I think that will really help power a stock that is trading well below other leading retailers like Walmart and Costco, which have forward P/Es nearing 40 times.
Geoffrey Seiler has positions in Alphabet and Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Costco Wholesale, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:434mo ago
Samsung Biologics Expands U.S. Manufacturing Capabilities with Strategic Acquisition of Human Genome Sciences from GSK
Secures the company's first U.S.-based manufacturing site, strengthening and diversifying its global supply network
Additional investments planned to expand the site's capacity (currently at 60,000 liters of drug substance) and capabilities to support growing manufacturing programs
Underscores Samsung Biologics' long-term dedication to the U.S. biopharmaceutical industry and supply chain
, /PRNewswire/ -- Samsung Biologics (KRX: 207940.KS), a leading contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO), today announced that its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Biologics America, has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of Human Genome Sciences from GSK (LSE/NYSE: GSK). This strategic move secures Samsung Biologics' first U.S.-based manufacturing site, a significant expansion of the company's global footprint and its long-term commitment to the U.S. market.
Samsung Biologics Expands U.S. Manufacturing Capabilities with Strategic Acquisition of Human Genome Sciences from GSK
Located in Rockville, Maryland, the facility sits at the center of one of the key U.S. bio-clusters and encompasses two cGMP manufacturing plants with a combined 60,000 liters of drug substance capacity, supporting both clinical and commercial production from small to large scale. Existing products will continue to be manufactured at the site, and Samsung Biologics plans to make additional investments to expand the site's capacity and upgrade technology to further support a more resilient U.S. supply chain for critical biologic medicines.
Under the terms of the agreement, with closing anticipated toward the end of Q1 of 2026, Samsung Biologics will acquire the Rockville assets for USD 280 million. The company will also retain more than 500 employees at the site to ensure operational continuity and stability. By integrating this facility into our global network, Samsung Biologics will provide clients with flexible, multi-site options in both the U.S. and Korea to ensure that live-saving therapeutics are reliably available to American patients.
Samsung Biologics has established a proven track record of operational and construction excellence through on-time completion of its Bio Campus I and II, and also recently secured land for Bio Campus III, which will house distinct R&D and manufacturing programs for new modalities. With 785,000 liters of capacity across five plants, the industry's leading capacity, Samsung Biologics continues to advance its diversified portfolio spanning monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), mRNA, organoid-based services, and next-generation therapies.
"This landmark acquisition is a testament to our unwavering commitment to advancing global healthcare and bolstering our manufacturing capabilities in the U.S. The investment will enable us to deepen our collaboration with federal, state, and local stakeholders to best serve our customers and partners while ensuring a reliable and stable supply of life-saving therapeutics," said John Rim, CEO and President of Samsung Biologics. "This marks an important step forward in our mission to achieve a better life through biomedicines, and we look forward to building on the legacy of this facility as we welcome experienced colleagues to the Samsung Biologics family and continue delivering innovative solutions that make a meaningful impact."
Regis Simard, President, Global Supply Chain, GSK, said: "Today's agreement to divest the Rockville manufacturing site to our valued long-term partner, Samsung Biologics, will secure the manufacture of two important medicines on US soil for US patients and further build GSK's supply chain resilience. Along with GSK's recent commitment to invest $30bn in R&D and manufacturing in the US over the next 5 years, this deal enables us to further focus on building the agility, capacity and capability needed in our manufacturing network to deliver the next generation of specialty medicines and vaccines. I am confident in a positive partnership and future for the Rockville site."
About Samsung Biologics
Samsung Biologics (KRX: 207940.KS) is a leading contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO), offering end-to-end integrated services that range from late discovery to commercial manufacturing.
With a combined biomanufacturing capacity of 785,000 liters across Bio Campus I and II, Samsung Biologics leverages cutting-edge technologies and expertise to advance diverse modalities, including multispecific antibodies, fusion proteins, antibody-drug conjugates, and mRNA therapeutics.
By implementing the ExellenS™ framework across its manufacturing network with standardized designs, unified processes, and advanced digitalization, Samsung Biologics ensures plant equivalency and speed for manufacturing continuity.
Samsung Biologics also operates commercial offices in Korea, the U.S., and Japan. Samsung Biologics America supports clients based in the U.S. and Europe, while its Tokyo sales office serves the APAC region.
Samsung Biologics continues to invest in new capabilities to maximize operational and quality excellence, ensuring flexibility and agility for clients. The company is committed to the on-time, in-full delivery of safe, high-quality biomedicines, as well as to making sustainable business decisions for the betterment of society and global health.
For more information, visit https://samsungbiologics.com/
Media Contact at Samsung Biologics:
Claire Kim, Senior Director [email protected]
SOURCE Samsung Biologics
2025-12-21 23:124mo ago
2025-12-21 17:564mo ago
Samsung Biologics to buy U.S. drug production facility from GSK for $280 mln
The generative artificial intelligence (AI) megatrend has allowed many older technology companies to rise from relative obscurity. And with its shares up by a whopping 170% year to date, Micron Technology (MU +6.99%) is an excellent example. Like the industry leader Nvidia, it serves the pick-and-shovel side of AI, supplying hardware that other companies will need to create consumer-facing software and services.
Let's dig deeper to see if it still has millionaire-maker potential.
Why is Micron booming?
While the AI hardware narrative tends to focus on graphics processing units (GPUs), which do the brunt of the work of running and training large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, there are other computer components that make the technology possible. Micron's high-bandwidth memory devices, such as DRAM and NAND flash, play a crucial role.
Today's Change
(
6.99
%) $
17.37
Current Price
$
265.92
The vast libraries of AI training data need to be stored somewhere. Furthermore, these algorithms rely on powerful working memory to access data in real time and answer users' questions. Micron is America's largest computer memory specialist, so it was only a matter of time before investor capital began flowing in. And the stock's growth isn't just based on hype. Operational results are also showing significant progress.
Fiscal fourth-quarter revenue surged 49% year over year to $37.38, driven by an explosion of demand from data center clients, which tend to focus on AI-related workloads. Micron is also seeing a sustained rise in gross margins (which are up from 35.3% to 44.7% year over year) as its product mix shifts toward higher-end memory products, which can command better pricing. There is still potential for continued improvements.
Can Micron's boom continue in 2026?
Historically, computer memory has been a highly cyclical industry prone to boom-and-bust cycles. This trend occurs because the products are generally commoditized and poorly differentiated from each other while having high fixed production costs and slow manufacturing lead times. When demand is high, producers invest in expanding their production capacity, leading to a glut when supply outstrips demand and pricing strategies become a race to the bottom.
These are fundamental characteristics of the industry. And unfortunately for Micron, there is no reason to believe that things will change anytime soon. That said, generative AI is already sparking a massive boom cycle for memory hardware that is very likely to continue in 2026 and beyond.
Image source: Getty Images.
Reuters reports that the ravenous generative AI demand is leading to shortages all across the computer memory industry as producers shift production capacity to higher-demand products. This trend means Micron may be able to command higher prices across its product line (which includes memory for devices ranging from smartphones to automobiles) as demand begins to outstrip supply.
Furthermore, analysts at Wells Fargo believe DRAM industry revenue could double in 2026, setting the company up for a huge amount of profit it can return to shareholders.
With a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of just 14, Micron stock is still remarkably cheap, despite its legendary rally in 2025. And memory hardware shortages could help the company maintain its outstanding momentum. While Micron probably won't make you a millionaire (because the current memory boom probably won't last forever), it looks poised for continued market-beating performance in 2026 and beyond.
The company will likely return a large portion of its growing profits to shareholders through its buyback program, which it resumed last year. While buybacks can feel less tangible than cash dividends, they are a better way to reward shareholders because they come with tax advantages. Dividends are taxed as ordinary income, while stock price appreciation is not taxed until you sell.
Furthermore, a buyback strategy could help smooth out the inherent cyclicality of Micron's business model by reducing the number of shares outstanding relative to future earnings.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:144mo ago
F5, Inc. (FFIV) Faces Securities Class Action Amid Cybersecurity Incident, Questions About Disclosure Timing and Impact on Company's Business – Hagens Berman
SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A securities class action lawsuit styled Smith v. F5, Inc., et al., No. 2:25-cv-02619 (W.D. Wash.) has been filed, seeking to represent investors in F5 (NASDAQ: FFIV) who purchased or otherwise acquired F5 securities between October 28, 2024 and October 27, 2025.
The lawsuit comes in the wake of F5’s October 15, 2025 report that, on August 9, 2025, it learned of a major cybersecurity incident involving a nation-state actor that gained unauthorized access to certain Company systems, including its highest revenue product (F5 BIG-IP). This and related subsequent disclosures drove the price of F5 shares sharply lower.
National shareholders rights firm Hagens Berman continues to investigate whether F5 timely reported the breach to investors and its impact on the company’s business. The firm urges F5 investors who suffered substantial losses to submit your losses now. The firm also encourages persons with knowledge who may be able to assist in the investigation to contact its attorneys.
Class Period: Oct. 28, 2024 – Oct. 27, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: Feb. 17, 2026
Visit: www.hbsslaw.com/investor-fraud/ffiv
Contact the Firm Now: [email protected]
844-916-0895
F5, Inc. (FFIV) Securities Class Action:
The lawsuit is focused on the timing and propriety of F5’s disclosures about the sufficiency of its cybersecurity response plan, the adverse effect of any cybersecurity incidents on its business and growth prospects including its F5 BIG-IP products which provide application delivery and security solutions.
Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period F5 assured investors that it “delivers the most effective and comprehensive app and API security platform in the industry[]” and claimed that it could uniquely address newly developing security concerns while providing best-in-class security offerings.
Investors’ expectations were dashed beginning on October 15, 2025. That day, F5 revealed that “[o]n August 9, 2025, F5, Inc. […] learned that a highly sophisticated nation-state threat actor had gained unauthorized access to certain Company systems.” F5 also disclosed “the threat actor maintained long-term, persistent access to certain F5 systems, including the BIG-IP product development environment and engineering knowledge management platform.”
Still, the company assured investors “this incident has not had a material impact on the Company’s operations[.]”
This news sent the price of F5 shares down $47.82 (-13.9%) during the two trading days ended October 16, 2025.
The incident’s full impact became clearer on October 27, 2025. That day, the company reported its Q4 and FY 2025 financial results and guided for 2026 revenue growth of only 0% to 4% as compared to 2025 revenue growth of 10%. Management blamed the steep growth deceleration “on what we see as potential near-term impact related to the security incident[]” and said “it would be natural that in some of our customers, at an executive level, we may see some delays of approvals or delays of deals or additional approval, as customers across a complex organization make sure that they want to be reassured that their projects should move forward[.]”
This news sent the price of F5 shares down $22.83 (-7.8%) the next day.
“We’re focused on when F5 determined that the August 2025 cybersecurity incident was material and whether the company timely informed investors consistent with the SEC’s 4 business day rule and which might have predated the October 15 disclosure,” said Reed Kathrein, the Hagens Berman partner leading the firm’s investigation.
If you invested in F5 and have substantial losses, or have knowledge that may assist the firm’s investigation, submit your losses now »
If you’d like more information and answers to frequently asked questions about the F5 case and our investigation, read more »
Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding F5 should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 844-916-0895 or email [email protected].
About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs’ rights complex litigation firm focusing on corporate accountability. The firm is home to a robust practice and represents investors as well as whistleblowers, workers, consumers and others in cases achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and other wrongdoings. Hagens Berman’s team has secured more than $2.9 billion in this area of law. More about the firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
Contact:
Reed Kathrein, 844-916-0895
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:154mo ago
VGT vs. SOXX: How Does Broad Tech Diversification Compare to Semiconductor Exposure for Investors?
Expense ratios, portfolio breadth, and sector focus set these two tech ETFs apart. See how their differences could impact your strategy.
The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT +2.02%) offers broader sector exposure, while the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX +2.66%) focuses tightly on U.S. semiconductor stocks.
Both funds provide exposure to U.S. technology. However, VGT casts a much wider net, with over 300 tech-related holdings, while SOXX targets just 30 leading semiconductor stocks. This comparison may appeal to those weighing concentrated industry bets against diversified sector coverage.
Snapshot (cost & size)MetricSOXXVGTIssueriSharesVanguardExpense ratio0.34%0.09%1-yr return (as of Dec. 16, 2025)41.81%16.10%Dividend yield0.55%0.41%Beta (5Y monthly)1.771.33AUM$16.7 billion$130.0 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
SOXX's higher dividend yield could be appealing to income-driven investors, while VGT's lower expense ratio gives it an edge for those focused on reducing costs.
Performance & risk comparisonMetricSOXXVGTMax drawdown (5 y)-45.75%-35.08%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$2,346$2,154What's insideVGT delivers exposure to the broader technology sector, spanning 322 stocks. Its top holdings -- Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft -- account for a substantial portion of assets, and the fund’s nearly 22-year history reflects long-term stability. With no leverage, currency hedge, or ESG overlays, VGT offers standard tech exposure.
By contrast, SOXX is a pure-play semiconductor tracker, currently holding 30 companies and allocating heavily to Broadcom, Advanced Micro Devices, and Nvidia. Investors looking for precise exposure to U.S. chipmakers may favor SOXX’s tight industry tilt.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investorsVGT and SOXX offer distinct strategies with their varied exposure to the technology sector.
VGT is far more diversified, holding more than 10 times the number of stocks as SOXX. While it's solely focused on tech stocks, it includes companies from all corners of the technology industry. SOXX is much more niche, targeting only 30 semiconductor stocks.
Greater diversification can be both an asset and a hindrance with ETFs. VGT has experienced less price volatility in recent years, with a milder max drawdown and lower beta. That can give it an edge if the market stumbles, as you're less likely to see significant ups and downs with this ETF.
At the same time, though, more diversification can sometimes result in lower-performing stocks dragging down the fund's total returns. SOXX has a much stronger one-year performance, nearly tripling the returns of VGT.
Each ETF has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, so neither is necessarily the better option. Where you choose to buy will depend on whether you're looking for diversified tech exposure or highly targeted access to semiconductor stocks. Just be sure you understand the risk and reward tradeoff when considering these two particular funds.
GlossaryExpense ratio: The annual fee, as a percentage of assets, that a fund charges its investors.
ETF (Exchange-Traded Fund): An investment fund traded on stock exchanges, holding a basket of assets like stocks or bonds.
Semiconductor: A material or company involved in making chips essential for electronic devices and computing.
Portfolio breadth: The range or diversity of different holdings within an investment fund.
Dividend yield: Annual dividends paid by a fund or stock divided by its current price, shown as a percentage.
Beta: A measure of an investment’s volatility compared to the overall market, typically the S&P 500.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of assets that a fund manages on behalf of investors.
Max drawdown: The largest percentage drop from a fund’s peak value to its lowest point over a specific period.
Growth of $1,000: The value $1,000 would reach if invested over a specified period, reflecting total returns.
Leverage: The use of borrowed money to increase the potential return (and risk) of an investment.
Currency hedge: A strategy to reduce the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations on investment returns.
Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard Information Technology ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and iShares Trust - iShares Semiconductor ETF. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:194mo ago
Opinion | The U.S. Can't Get Xi Hooked on Nvidia Chips
‘The exports will relinquish our lead in frontier AI models while actively supporting China's military and economic advancement,' writes Dmitri Alperovitch.
The answer depends on what you believe about the artificial intelligence spending cycle.
Shares of Nvidia (NVDA +3.80%) have begun to sputter. The stock is close to flat since this summer, with investors worried about peak spending on artificial intelligence (AI) computer chips. With a share price that has risen over 1,000% in the last five years, who can blame them? Nvidia is now the largest company by market cap in the world, and while it is growing its revenue and earnings at an incredible rate right now, that could come to a halt if the AI spending boom collapses.
Does that mean Nvidia stock is set to crash next year?
Today's Change
(
3.80
%) $
6.62
Current Price
$
180.76
Massive current growth, cyclicality risks
There is no denying that Nvidia is growing rapidly right now. It has a lock on the AI computer chip market, meaning that virtually every large technology provider or start-up building AI models needs to buy its products. Last quarter, revenue grew 62% year over year to $57 billion, with data center revenue growing even faster.
Management says that its upcoming Blackwell computer chip is selling out of its upcoming supply, which is a good near-term determination of future growth. Profit margins are off the charts, with operating margin up to 63% last quarter.
If current growth rates continue, then Nvidia will do well for shareholders in 2026. But eventually, the AI computer chip supply will start to match demand, as it does in any spending supercycle. This will lower Nvidia's revenue growth rate, and could make it even turn negative for a short while. Profit margins are going to fall once the company loses its pricing power, especially if competition keeps rising from Alphabet's TPU chip and Amazon's Trainium chip.
A downside scenario such as this could risk Nvidia's earnings power being lower 12 months from now.
Image source: Nvidia.
A valuation that is demanding
Another reason to be concerned about Nvidia's stock in 2026 is its demanding valuation. The stock currently has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 43, which is well above the market average at a time when the market's average P/E ratio is close to an all-time high.
What does this mean? Investors buying or holding Nvidia stock in 2026 need to expect strong earnings growth in the next few quarters. Nvidia is now one of the largest companies in the world by revenue, with incredibly strong profit margins. It cannot grow revenue at 62% year over year forever with over $50 billion in quarterly revenue; there is simply not that much capital in the world capable of making these large upfront investments into Nvidia computer chips.
Data by YCharts.
Will Nvidia stock crash next year?
It is impossible to have 100% certainty regarding Nvidia's stock price trajectory in 2026. If anyone did, they could become a millionaire rather quickly.
What an investor needs to analyze is how likely it is that Nvidia's stock crashes next year. Right now, spending on AI infrastructure is growing rapidly, which is leading to huge demand for Nvidia computer chips. But there are some signs of cracks showing up in the spending plans for players such as OpenAI, Microsoft, and Oracle. Microsoft is beginning to slow its plans for data center development. OpenAI is trying to spend hundreds of billions of dollars that it doesn't have today. Oracle is turning deeply free-cash-flow-negative to build out cloud computing data centers, and investors are not happy about it.
All of these variables point to risks for Nvidia's demand in 2026. Combined with its high P/E ratio and above-average profit margins, Nvidia stock could definitely crash in 2026. I'm not saying it is guaranteed to happen, but it is something that any Nvidia shareholder needs to consider as a possibility next year.
Brett Schafer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Oracle. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:234mo ago
KMX 12-DAY DEADLINE ALERT: CarMax (KMX) Sued Over Alleged "Temporary Demand Pull-Forward" and Loan Portfolio Risk - Hagens Berman
San Francisco, California--(Newsfile Corp. - December 21, 2025) - National shareholder rights law firm Hagens Berman reminds investors that the deadline to move the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff in the securities class action lawsuit against CarMax, Inc. (NYSE: KMX) is January 2, 2026.
The lawsuit alleges that CarMax and its executives provided materially false and misleading information by failing to disclose that the strong growth touted in Q1 2026 was merely a temporary, unsustainable "pull forward" of customer demand and that its loan portfolio (CAF) was facing significant, undisclosed risks.
"Our investigation focuses on whether CarMax's executives prioritized short-term optics over transparency, by claiming robust growth that was allegedly driven by a one-time tariff event," said Reed Kathrein, the Hagens Berman partner leading the firm's investigation. "We are scrutinizing the significant increase in the loan loss provision for the CAF portfolio, which may suggest undisclosed weaknesses in the core business. Investors in CarMax who suffered significant losses during the Class Period should contact the firm now to discuss their rights."
Legal Analysis: Undisclosed Business Weakness & Risk
The complaint details the alleged gap between the Company's public statements about sustainable growth and the undisclosed material adverse facts regarding its operational and financial stability.
Disclosure EventImpact on KMX Stock PriceAlleged Securities Violation RevealedQ2 2026 Earnings
(Sept. 25, 2025)Stock fell 20%; comparable unit sales down 6.3%.Misrepresenting the nature of demand; failing to disclose the unsustainable "pull forward" effect of tariffs.CEO Departure & Outlook
(Nov. 6, 2025)Stock fell 24%; weak Q3 guidance (8%-12% decline).Undisclosed underlying business weakness and lack of sustainable growth prospects.CAF Loan Portfolio$142 Million increase in loan loss provision.Misrepresenting the quality and risk inherent in the CarMax Auto Finance (CAF) loan portfolio.The lawsuit specifically covers investors who purchased CarMax securities between June 20, 2025, and November 5, 2025. The two alleged disclosures led to dual stock crashes, demonstrating the magnitude of the alleged misrepresentations.
Next Steps: Contact Partner Reed Kathrein Today
Hagens Berman has a proven track record, securing over $325 billion in settlements for investors and consumers.
Mr. Kathrein is actively advising investors who purchased KMX shares during the Class Period and suffered significant losses due to the undisclosed risks regarding the "pull forward" demand and the CAF loan portfolio.
The Lead Plaintiff Deadline is January 2, 2026.
TO SUBMIT YOUR CARMAX (KMX) STOCK LOSSES NOW, PLEASE USE THE SECURE FORM BELOW:
If you'd like more information and answers to frequently asked questions about the CarMax case and our investigation, read more ».
Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding CarMax should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 844-916-0895 or email [email protected].
# # #
About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation firm focusing on corporate accountability. The firm is home to a robust practice and represents investors as well as whistleblowers, workers, consumers and others in cases achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and other wrongdoings. Hagens Berman's team has secured more than $2.9 billion in this area of law. More about the firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/278779
Source: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence?
Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Contact Us
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:304mo ago
If You'd Invested $500 in Netflix stock 10 Years Ago, Here's How Much You'd Have Today
The streaming giant's returns have beaten the market by a wide margin.
Netflix (NFLX +0.35%) has been back in the news recently with its bid to acquire the majority of Warner Bros. Discovery's assets. Although there's a way to go until that massive deal closes (or falls apart), it represents a new direction for the streaming king.
Netflix has done this several times before -- pivoting into an adjacent business and pioneering new media directions. And if you had invested $500 in its stock 10 years ago, back when it was a different operation, the shares you bought would be worth a lot more today.
Image source: Netflix.
The new Netflix
Netflix, as most readers will know, began as a DVD-by-mail rental service, but it segued into streaming as the technological foundation required to support such services developed. It started offering streaming video subscriptions in 2007, and created its first original content in 2012. By 2015, Netflix was already a household name with a fast-growing business, and smart investors could have easily seen its potential.
If you had invested $500 in late 2015 and held on through the ups and downs that followed, your stake would be worth $3,869 today. That's a 674% gain. For reference, the S&P 500 had a total return of 301% over that decade.
Today's Change
(
0.35
%) $
0.33
Current Price
$
94.33
Could Netflix do that again over the next 10 years? It's unlikely. Netflix is no longer the young and comparatively small company it was 10 years ago. However, it has demonstrated time and time again that it can dictate trends and change the media scene, and it should be able to keep growing. It could still be a strong addition to a well-rounded investment portfolio.
Jennifer Saibil has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 15:404mo ago
The 5 Best Growth Stocks to Buy Right Now for 2026
If you are seeking multibagger returns over the long term, this group of five growth stocks may offer some potential.
As we approach a new year, it is the perfect time to add some new money to some of the most promising growth stocks on the market. While the broader S&P 500 index remains within a couple of percentage points of its all-time high, the stocks in this article are down between 22% and 55% from their 52-week highs.
Despite their recent declines, these businesses have exhibited strong past price appreciation (over the longer term) and delivered revenue growth between 16% and 48% in the last quarter. Furthermore, each stock is powered by what could be decades-long megatrends, making them five of the best growth stocks to double down on in 2026.
Image source: Getty Images.
1. Rocket Lab USA
Since its initial public offering (IPO) in 2021, end-to-end space company Rocket Lab USA (RKLB +17.57%) has quickly become a five-bagger for investors. Over the same time, though, its sales have risen nearly tenfold, so I don't believe investors have "missed their chance."
Powered by this growth, the founder-led company has become the No. 3 player in the launch services and space systems industry, trailing only SpaceX and Blue Origin. However, with its first medium-launcher Neutron rocket set for blastoff in Q1 next year, Rocket Lab could become a bigger competitor to its larger peers.
Vertically integrated, Rocket Lab is positioned for decades of growth across its business segments: launch, spacecraft, and payloads. Furthermore, the company's operations continue to scale beautifully.
Data by YCharts.
With McKinsey and Company projecting the space industry to grow from $630 billion in 2023 to $1.8 trillion by 2035, Rocket Lab could outgrow its relatively minuscule market cap of $28 billion. Ultimately, the company's growth optionality is unfathomably considerable as mega-cap tech companies and governments experiment with new space concepts.
Today's Change
(
17.57
%) $
10.53
Current Price
$
70.44
As long as Rocket Lab's sales growth and scaling margins persist, I'm happy to continue adding to the company over time -- especially with shares 20% below their high.
2. Kinsale Capital
If space companies don't interest you, let's try the opposite side of the excitement spectrum and look at Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL +0.32%) and its best-in-class excess and surplus insurance operations. Compounding total returns for investors by 39% since its 2016 IPO, Kinsale may be the most efficient insurer on the market.
With a combined ratio of 77%, the company's profitability is superior to its peers, who maintain an average combined ratio of 92%. What makes this industry-leading profitability even more incredible is that Kinsale produced it while delivering revenue growth of 39% annually over the last decade.
Focusing on small, hard-to-assess risks that its mega-peers typically try to avoid, Kinsale has carved out a lucrative niche for itself. That said, Kinsale's revenue growth slowed to 19% in the latest quarter, as pricing competition intensified and management opted to prioritize profitability over sales growth.
Today's Change
(
0.32
%) $
1.27
Current Price
$
397.27
With its stock down 24% on this growth slowdown, it looks like the perfect time to buy this growth stock.
3. MercadoLibre
Since its IPO in 2007, Latin American e-commerce and fintech juggernaut MercadoLibre (MELI +1.63%) has become a 70-bagger. Over the same time, the company's sales grew from $85 million to $26 billion today. Despite this market-trouncing run, MercadoLibre's brightest days may still lie ahead, even though it is already Latin America's largest business.
Today's Change
(
1.63
%) $
32.05
Current Price
$
1996.51
While the company has become synonymous with e-commerce in the countries it serves, the online buying penetration rate in Latin America is still only half that of the U.S.Furthermore, Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina account for 96% of MercadoLibre's sales, showing that there are many more chapters left in the company's growth story as it experiments in new countries.
Home to a massive flywheel that supports its logistics network, which in turn facilitates e-commerce transactions, generating payments for its fintech unit, which helps feed its credit business, and so on, MercadoLibre remains my favorite growth stock to buy after its 23% dip from July 2025 highs.
4. SPS Commerce
SPS Commerce (SPSC 1.01%) is a leading supply chain cloud services provider that has delivered 18% annualized returns for investors since 2010. Growing its sales by 26 times in value over that time, the company's solutions have become mandatory for many retailers, third-party logistics providers, and suppliers as the world continues to shift toward omnichannel sales.
SPS's offerings have become so popular that the company has gone 99 consecutive quarters with positive sales growth. However, after seeing its sales growth rate decelerate slightly and guiding for "only" 8% sales growth in 2026, the company's shares have plummeted over 55% over the last year.
Ultimately, I think this drop is a byproduct of the company being previously priced for perfection at over 70 times free cash flow (FCF).
Data by YCharts.
Now available at just 23 times FCF, and planning to buy back shares with at least half of the FCF it generates, this niche-leading market outperformer looks like a steal.
Image source: Dutch Bros.
5. Dutch Bros
Burgeoning handcrafted beverages chain Dutch Bros (BROS 0.21%) has seen its stock price rise by 14% annually since 2021. Home to 1,089 locations across 17 states, Dutch Bros commands a cult-like following and is rapidly expanding throughout the rest of the U.S. Management's stretch goal for the company is to reach 2,029 locations by 2029 -- and they are well on their way after growing store count by 14% in 2025.
However, Dutch Bros isn't just an expansion story. Its same-store sales have grown for 10 straight quarters, and the company now funds expansion plans almost entirely in-house from the cash generated by its operations. This marks a significant turning point for the company, as it previously relied on issuing new shares to grow, thereby diluting shareholder value.
Trading at 40 times cash from operations, Dutch Bros stock isn't cheap. Yet, if it lands anywhere close to its 2,029 stores by 2029 goal, it could be on its way to becoming a multibagger of its own.
There are several companies primed to thrive in 2026.
With 2026 quickly approaching, investors need to have a game plan for what stocks they will buy. Several interesting trends are brewing in the market, and may cause investors to think differently about how they want to invest. Still, I think some smart investments in the artificial intelligence (AI) realm could result in monster returns in 2026.
Three smart stocks to buy with $1,000 right now for 2026 are Alphabet (GOOG +1.55%) (GOOGL +1.55%), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM +1.67%), and Amazon (AMZN +0.26%). All three of these are primed to outperform the market in 2026, making them great buys now.
Image source: Getty Images.
Alphabet
Alphabet has been one of the best performing stocks in 2025, rising more than 60% so far. Alphabet's performance can be tied to multiple successes, including the continued dominance of its core business, Google Search; developing a leading generative AI model in Gemini; and considering selling its custom Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) to outside clients.
Today's Change
(
1.55
%) $
4.70
Current Price
$
307.16
Those are all significant developments that have answered many outstanding questions surrounding Alphabet's stock at the start of 2025, clearing the way for another successful year in 2026. Wall Street analysts expect Alphabet to grow its revenue by nearly 14% next year, which is impressive considering its business maturity. That isn't going to dramatically outperform the market, but it should be enough to propel Alphabet over the 10% threshold that many investors wish to exceed when picking individual stocks.
Alphabet has transformed from an artificial intelligence laggard to an AI leader in 2026, and I believe that trend will continue to power the stock higher in 2026 and beyond.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keeping up with which company is providing the best computing unit possible is exhausting. While Nvidia and its graphics processing units (GPUs) have dominated so far, other companies like Alphabet are starting to challenge its dominance. This sparring will go back and forth forever, but what won't change is where most of the chips are sourced from.
Taiwan Semiconductor is the world's largest foundry by revenue and is the primary source for high-end computing chips, such as those used in various computing units within AI data centers. As long as AI hyperscalers continue to build out their AI computing power, Taiwan Semiconductor will remain an excellent investment. With the AI hyperscalers informing investors that 2026 will be another year of record-setting capital expenditures, this thesis is on track.
Today's Change
(
1.67
%) $
4.76
Current Price
$
289.44
Taiwan Semiconductor also trades for less than 23 times next year's earnings, making it the cheapest company on this list. Taiwan Semiconductor is set up for a great 2026 with all of the massive spending occurring, positioning it as a great stock to buy now.
Amazon
Amazon has had a disappointing 2025, with the stock essentially flat for the year. That's frustrating for investors, especially when stocks like Taiwan Semiconductor and Alphabet have done so well. However, this sets the stage for a comeback in 2026, especially behind the strength of its growing business units.
Today's Change
(
0.26
%) $
0.59
Current Price
$
227.35
While most view Amazon as an e-commerce company, that segment doesn't provide the majority of the profits. Instead, its cloud computing wing, Amazon Web Services (AWS), does. In Q3, AWS generated the majority of Amazon's operating profits while growing revenue at a 20% pace. That's faster than the companywide 13% growth rate. When the most profitable business unit is also growing faster than the overall business, that's an excellent sign for investors.
Another area to watch is Amazon's advertising business. Amazon's ad business is the company's fastest-growing division, rising 24% in Q3. It has also grown to become a huge part of the business, allowing it to boost Amazon's margins as well.
The continued strength of both segments is key for 2026, and if they continue to do well, Amazon will make a comeback and be an excellent stock to buy and hold in 2026.
Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Andrew Gibb is a long-term bull when it comes to cryptocurrencies. Not only does he see institutional investing adding long-term muscles to the trade, but Andrew makes the case for Bitcoin's "amazing narrative" making long-lasting impacts.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 16:014mo ago
Important Notice to Long-Term Shareholders of Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY) F/K/A Empower Ltd.: Grabar Law Office Investigates Claims on Your Behalf After Securities Fraud Class Action Complaint Survives Motion to Dismiss
PHILADELPHIA, Dec. 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Current Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY) shareholders who have held Holley shares since on or shortly after July 21, 2021, or via holdings of Empower Ltd. (a SPAC), can seek corporate reforms, the return of funds back to the company, and a court approved incentive award at no cost to them whatsoever. If you would like to learn more about this matter, you are encouraged to visit https://grabarlaw.com/the-latest/holley-shareholder-investigation/, contact Joshua Grabar at [email protected], or call 267-507-6085.
Why? A federal securities fraud class action complaint has survived a motion to dismiss. That complaint alleges that Holley Inc. (NYSE: HLLY) f/k/a Empower Ltd., through certain of its officers and directors, made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) as a result of Holley’s extensive focus on its direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) channel, Holley’s critically important relationships with its resellers and distributors, whose business made up the vast majority of Holley’s revenue, were suffering significant damage; (ii) Holley used discounting and other similar efforts to grow its DTC channel, which undermined the pricing discipline Holley historically had with its resellers and distributors, and further damaged Holley’s relationship with its resellers and distributors; (iii) as a result of Holley’s strained relationships with its resellers and distributors, those resellers and distributors were decreasing their purchases of Holley products, returning products already purchased at significant levels that were far above historical norms, and increasing their purchases of competitors’ products; (iv) Holley’s growing DTC channel could not offset the negative financial impact of Holley’s increasingly strained relationships with its resellers and distributors and, as a result, Holley’s critical relationship with resellers and distributors was deteriorating; (v) Holley had failed to successfully integrate and capture synergies from its numerous acquisitions, which left Holley with inefficient operations, excess costs, and inventory management problems; and (vi) Holley benefited from COVID-related stimulus money that temporarily boosted its sales and performance, and despite this unsustainable, temporary boost, defendants misled investors to believe the growth was sustainable and the result of persistent demand, and supportive of positive financial guidance.
The Court in the underlying securities fraud class action has determined that with respect to multiple statements made by company leadership, the Complaint “has pleaded the requisite level of falsity needed to survive dismissal by listing the statements and providing reasons why they were misleading or false.” The court further determined that the Complaint sufficiently pleaded allegations of falsity and scienter (knowledge of wrongdoing or intent to deceive, defraud, or act unlawfully, or with reckless indifference), as required for a prima facie case as to these claims.
What You Can Do Now: Current Holley shareholders who have held Holley shares since on or shortly after July 21, 2021, or via holdings of Empower Ltd., can seek corporate reforms, the return of funds back to the company, and a court approved incentive award at no cost to them whatsoever. If you would like to learn more about this matter, you are encouraged to visit https://grabarlaw.com/the-latest/holley-shareholder-investigation/, contact Joshua Grabar at [email protected], or call 267-507-6085. $HLLY #HolleyInc #HLLY #Holley
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer
Contact:
Joshua H. Grabar, Esq.
Grabar Law Office
One Liberty Place
1650 Market Street, Suite 3600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: 267-507-6085
Email: [email protected]
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 16:144mo ago
Why Is Micron Stock Soaring, and is it Time to Take Profits?
Investors are becoming more comfortable with Micron stock, despite its large capital expenditures.
Micron (MU +6.99%) reported fantastic quarterly financial results that sent the stock price higher.
*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of Dec. 17, 2025. The video was published on Dec. 19, 2025.
Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.
2025-12-21 22:114mo ago
2025-12-21 16:184mo ago
QLD vs. SPXL: Is Tech-Heavy Growth or S&P 500 Diversification Better for Investors?
QLD has delivered a marginally higher one-year total return than SPXL, but both funds exhibit similar extreme drawdown risk. SPXL holds far more stocks, while QLD concentrates heavily in technology with just 101 positions.
Macroeconomic headwinds have investors concerned about Costco stock.
Costco (COST 0.21%) stock is experiencing a rare underperformance in 2025.
*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of Dec. 17, 2025. The video was published on Dec. 19, 2025.
Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.