Market Signal Briefing

TLDR: Table of Contents

TLDR:Dollar Strength Exposes the Limits of Traditional Safe HavensFive Red Months Push Bitcoin Toward Historic ExhaustionWhat a Reversal Could Mean for BTC and Altcoins Bitcoin has recorded five straight monthly red candles in 2025, pushing sentiment to historically exhausted levels. Gold and silver erased $2.4 trillion in market value in one session after a parabolic rally through early 2025. Dollar strength overrode geopolitical fear, revealing gold as a macro trade rather than a pure crisis hedge.  A strong Bitcoin monthly reversal could trigger sharp altcoin gains, especially in assets that held technical structure. Bitcoin continues to face mounting pressure as traditional safe-haven assets experience a sharp reversal. Gold and silver together erased roughly $2.4 trillion in combined market value in a single trading session.

The selloff followed a parabolic rally that both metals staged earlier in 2025. Bitcoin, by contrast, has now recorded five consecutive monthly red candles throughout the year.

Dollar strength has become the dominant force shaping price action across both crypto and commodity markets.

Dollar Strength Exposes the Limits of Traditional Safe Havens Gold and silver have long been considered reliable hedges during times of geopolitical uncertainty. However, recent price action across both metals tells a different story about their true nature.

Despite tensions involving Iran, global shipping disruptions, and persistent inflation talk, dollar strength overrode fear-driven demand for metals.

Gold climbed as much as 96% since the start of 2025, while silver surged approximately 191% over the same period.

Both assets had entered parabolic territory before the sharp correction ultimately took hold. The pullback effectively flushed excess leverage from an already overstretched market position.

One analyst on X wrote that dollar strength “overpowered fear,” arguing gold behaves more like a macro trade.

METALS ARE BETRAYING YOU !

Gold and Silver have wiped out $2.4T today
This is more than the market cap of Bitcoin.

> Gold and silver just came off a parabolic run.

> Bitcoin with "5 straight monthly red" candles.
And six straight red months have never happened.

Lets talk… https://t.co/dORNVkB7Py pic.twitter.com/z6HJn1kpXV

— Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) March 3, 2026

According to the post, gold remains tied to yields and the dollar, not a pure crisis hedge. The comment reflects how macro traders are reassessing the metal’s role in uncertain conditions.

Five Red Months Push Bitcoin Toward Historic Exhaustion The digital asset has fallen approximately 27% since the start of 2025, even as metals posted strong gains. The nature of that decline, however, differs sharply from the selloff metals experienced this week. Rather than a sudden forced liquidation, the drop has resembled a slow and sustained liquidity drain.

Forced selling in overleveraged markets typically produces violent, sharp price drops within short timeframes. Bitcoin’s five-month slide has been more measured and gradual by comparison. That distinction carries weight when evaluating where the asset stands heading forward.

Bitcoin is now trading at historically stretched levels across multiple timeframes. Sentiment has been steadily drained throughout several months of consecutive losses. In effect, the asset has already completed the reset cycle that metals are only now beginning.

What a Reversal Could Mean for BTC and Altcoins A strong monthly close for Bitcoin at current levels would carry considerable upside momentum. Historically, when a price breaks out after extended compression, the move tends to be sharp rather than gradual.

Altcoins that maintained structure during the prolonged bleed are best positioned to benefit from any rotation.

The same analyst noted that when Bitcoin moves aggressively after long compression, altcoins tend not to follow quietly. Instead, they often surge alongside the broader shift in market sentiment. Assets that held technical structure through the downturn are likely to see the largest moves.

Risk factors, however, remain present. If dollar strength continues building and equities weaken, Bitcoin will not escape the broader fallout. Oversold conditions build potential energy, but a macro catalyst is still needed to confirm a sustained reversal.

Bitcoin (BTC)

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Ahmed Balaha

Author

Ahmed Balaha

Part of the Team Since

Aug 2025

About Author

Ahmed Balaha is a journalist and copywriter based in Georgia with a growing focus on blockchain technology, DeFi, AI, privacy, digital assets, and fintech innovation.

Has Also Written

Ad Disclosure

Ad Disclosure

We believe in full transparency with our readers. Some of our content includes affiliate links, and we may earn a commission through these partnerships. However, this potential compensation never influences our analysis, opinions, or reviews. Our editorial content is created independently of our marketing partnerships, and our ratings are based solely on our established evaluation criteria. Read More

Last updated: 

7 minutes ago

Bitcoin just bounced and confidence started going back as price prediction for $72,000 returned.

And then a veteran trader threw cold water on the whole move.

According to multiple market analysts, the recent recovery from the $63,000 zone may not mark the start of a sustained uptrend. Instead, it could be setting up what they describe as a “final flush”, one more sharp drop designed to shake out weak hands before any meaningful bottom forms.

Source: EduwaveTrading, Market AnalystThe core argument is Bitcoin has not fully cleared prior downside liquidity pockets.

In past cycles, that kind of unfinished business often leads to another sweep lower before stability returns. Some traders believe price could revisit the low $60,000 area, with risk of a deeper move toward the high $50,000s if selling accelerates.

Importantly, this is not a long term death call. Even the bearish voices frame it as a potential capitulation event, not the end of the bull structure.

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Is Another Crash Imminent?“Crash” might be too dramatic. But volatility is clearly not finished.

If sellers remain in control and momentum fails to shift, a move back toward the recent swing lows becomes increasingly likely. That could feel brutal in the moment, especially for late buyers expecting an immediate breakout.

The chart shows why the “final flush” idea is still alive.

Bitcoin is squeezing inside a triangle. Descending resistance from the January highs and rising support from the $60,000 base.

Price just pushed into the $70,000 to $72,000 ceiling again, but it has not broken and held above it.

Source: BTCUSD / TradingViewThat upper trendline is everything. Every rally into that zone has been sold. If it rejects again, pressure rotates back down toward $64,000 first, then the major $60,000 floor.

A clean break below $64,000 increases the odds of a deeper sweep. Lose $60,000 with momentum and the high $50,000s come into play. That is the flush scenario analysts keep warning about.

Bulls have one clear invalidation level. A strong 2h or daily close above $72,000, with follow through, breaks the descending resistance and shifts structure. That would open the path toward $80,000, then $84,000 and potentially $90,000.

Bitcoin Hyper: Can This Bitcoin Layer 2 Be the Real Big Utility Play?Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is a new presale using Solana tech to make Bitcoin a lot faster and cheaper, without touching its core security.

It basically turns Bitcoin from something you just watch on a chart into something you can actually use. Payments. Staking. Apps. Real on-chain action.

And this is not just hype. The presale has already raised over $32 million, with $HYPER priced at $0.0136751 before the next increase.

Staking rewards are going up to 37% right now, which definitely grabs attention.

If Bitcoin takes off, Bitcoin Hyper likely moves with it. If Bitcoin keeps chopping sideways, it still benefits from actual network activity. It is built around usage, not just waiting for the next pump.

To buy HYPER before it lists on exchanges, simply visit the official Bitcoin Hyper website and connect a wallet (such as Best Wallet).

Visit the Official Bitcoin Hyper Website Here

Bitcoin trades around $68,000, showing relative stability even as broader geopolitical tensions keep risk sentiment fragile. Cryptocurrency Ticker Price Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) $68,661.79 Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) $1,989.89 Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) $85.46 XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) $1.36 Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) $0.08966 Shiba Inu (CRYPTO: SHIB) $0.055488 Notable Statistics: Coinglass data shows 111,700 traders were liquidated in the past 24 hours for $370.30 million.

Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) Presents at Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference 2026 Transcript

NEW YORK, March 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Picard Medical, Inc. (“Picard” or the “Company”) (NYSE: PMI). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.

The class action concerns whether Picard and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices.

You have until April 3, 2026, to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class if you purchased or otherwise acquired Picard securities during the Class Period. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

In the weeks leading up to October 23, 2025, Picard’s stock price surged from its IPO price of $4.00 per share to an all-time high of $13.68 per share, despite no fundamental news from the Company to justify such a spike.  Investigations have since revealed that Picard’s stock was the subject of an illicit social-media-based promotion scheme that artificially inflated its price, in which impersonators claiming to be legitimate financial advisors touted Picard with sensational but baseless claims to create a buying frenzy among retail investors.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT: 
Danielle Peyton 
Pomerantz LLP 
[email protected] 
646-581-9980 ext. 7980 

Growth stocks are attractive to many investors, as above-average financial growth helps these stocks easily grab the market's attention and produce exceptional returns. But finding a great growth stock is not easy at all.

By their very nature, these stocks carry above-average risk and volatility. Moreover, if a company's growth story is over or nearing its end, betting on it could lead to significant loss.

However, the task of finding cutting-edge growth stocks is made easy with the help of the Zacks Growth Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which looks beyond the traditional growth attributes to analyze a company's real growth prospects.

Our proprietary system currently recommends Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU - Free Report) as one such stock. This company not only has a favorable Growth Score, but also carries a top Zacks Rank.

Research shows that stocks carrying the best growth features consistently beat the market. And returns are even better for stocks that possess the combination of a Growth Score of A or B and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy).

While there are numerous reasons why the stock of this company is a great growth pick right now, we have highlighted three of the most important factors below:

Earnings GrowthArguably nothing is more important than earnings growth, as surging profit levels is what most investors are after. For growth investors, double-digit earnings growth is highly preferable, as it is often perceived as an indication of strong prospects (and stock price gains) for the company under consideration.

While the historical EPS growth rate for Nu is 144.5%, investors should actually focus on the projected growth. The company's EPS is expected to grow 39.9% this year, crushing the industry average, which calls for EPS growth of 16.7%.

Cash Flow GrowthWhile cash is the lifeblood of any business, higher-than-average cash flow growth is more important and beneficial for growth-oriented companies than for mature companies. That's because, growth in cash flow enables these companies to expand their businesses without depending on expensive outside funds.

Right now, year-over-year cash flow growth for Nu is 38.8%, which is higher than many of its peers. In fact, the rate compares to the industry average of 8.4%.

While investors should actually consider the current cash flow growth, it's worth taking a look at the historical rate too for putting the current reading into proper perspective. The company's annualized cash flow growth rate has been 84.4% over the past 3-5 years versus the industry average of 10%.

Promising Earnings Estimate RevisionsBeyond the metrics outlined above, investors should consider the trend in earnings estimate revisions. A positive trend is a plus here. Empirical research shows that there is a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

The current-year earnings estimates for Nu have been revising upward. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has surged 0.6% over the past month.

Bottom LineNu has not only earned a Growth Score of B based on a number of factors, including the ones discussed above, but it also carries a Zacks Rank #2 because of the positive earnings estimate revisions.

You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

This combination positions Nu well for outperformance, so growth investors may want to bet on it.

Growth investors focus on stocks that are seeing above-average financial growth, as this feature helps these securities garner the market's attention and deliver solid returns. But finding a growth stock that can live up to its true potential can be a tough task.

That's because, these stocks usually carry above-average risk and volatility. In fact, betting on a stock for which the growth story is actually over or nearing its end could lead to significant loss.

However, the Zacks Growth Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which looks beyond the traditional growth attributes to analyze a company's real growth prospects, makes it pretty easy to find cutting-edge growth stocks.

Astec Industries (ASTE - Free Report) is one such stock that our proprietary system currently recommends. The company not only has a favorable Growth Score, but also carries a top Zacks Rank.

Research shows that stocks carrying the best growth features consistently beat the market. And for stocks that have a combination of a Growth Score of A or B and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy), returns are even better.

While there are numerous reasons why the stock of this maker of equipment for building, paving and mining is a great growth pick right now, we have highlighted three of the most important factors below:

Earnings GrowthEarnings growth is arguably the most important factor, as stocks exhibiting exceptionally surging profit levels tend to attract the attention of most investors. For growth investors, double-digit earnings growth is highly preferable, as it is often perceived as an indication of strong prospects (and stock price gains) for the company under consideration.

While the historical EPS growth rate for Astec Industries is 20.9%, investors should actually focus on the projected growth. The company's EPS is expected to grow 13.5% this year, crushing the industry average, which calls for EPS growth of 12.1%.

Impressive Asset Utilization RatioAsset utilization ratio -- also known as sales-to-total-assets (S/TA) ratio -- is often overlooked by investors, but it is an important indicator in growth investing. This metric exhibits how efficiently a firm is utilizing its assets to generate sales.

Right now, Astec Industries has an S/TA ratio of 1.17, which means that the company gets $1.17 in sales for each dollar in assets. Comparing this to the industry average of 1.03, it can be said that the company is more efficient.

In addition to efficiency in generating sales, sales growth plays an important role. And Astec Industries is well positioned from a sales growth perspective too. The company's sales are expected to grow 13% this year versus the industry average of 0%.

Promising Earnings Estimate RevisionsBeyond the metrics outlined above, investors should consider the trend in earnings estimate revisions. A positive trend is a plus here. Empirical research shows that there is a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

The current-year earnings estimates for Astec Industries have been revising upward. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has surged 14.5% over the past month.

Bottom LineAstec Industries has not only earned a Growth Score of B based on a number of factors, including the ones discussed above, but it also carries a Zacks Rank #1 because of the positive earnings estimate revisions.

You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

This combination positions Astec Industries well for outperformance, so growth investors may want to bet on it.

HomeStock IdeasQuick Picks & Lists

SummaryDefense stocks have surged as the Middle East war escalates. Despite a pullback, they have outperformed in the last year on rising military budgets.The U.S.-Israeli operation in Iran and its ramifications have investors mulling increased military spending and contract awards.Defense stocks are also riding long-term structural factors, including AI-enabled systems and faster product cycles, that have led to tech-style valuations.SA Quant identified 10 defense stocks that stand to gain from rising geopolitical tensions and long-term structural tailwinds.I am Steven Cress, Head of Quantitative Strategies at Seeking Alpha. I manage the quant ratings and factor grades on stocks and ETFs in Seeking Alpha Premium. I also lead Alpha Picks, which selects the two most attractive stocks to buy each month, and also determines when to sell them. mammuth/iStock via Getty Images

Defense Stocks Climb as Middle East Conflict Escalates The escalating conflict in the Middle East, sparked by the U.S.-Israeli operation in Iran over the weekend, has fueled market volatility, sending defense and energy stocks surging while pummeling travel shares. As Iran

87.17K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given that any particular security, portfolio, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The author is not advising you personally concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security or other matter. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. Steven Cress is the Head of Quantitative Strategy at Seeking Alpha. Any views or opinions expressed herein may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank.

Growth investors focus on stocks that are seeing above-average financial growth, as this feature helps these securities garner the market's attention and deliver solid returns. However, it isn't easy to find a great growth stock.

That's because, these stocks usually carry above-average risk and volatility. In fact, betting on a stock for which the growth story is actually over or nearing its end could lead to significant loss.

However, the Zacks Growth Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which looks beyond the traditional growth attributes to analyze a company's real growth prospects, makes it pretty easy to find cutting-edge growth stocks.

Iamgold (IAG - Free Report) is on the list of such stocks currently recommended by our proprietary system. In addition to a favorable Growth Score, it carries a top Zacks Rank.

Research shows that stocks carrying the best growth features consistently beat the market. And returns are even better for stocks that possess the combination of a Growth Score of A or B and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy).

Here are three of the most important factors that make the stock of this gold and niobium mining company a great growth pick right now.

Earnings GrowthArguably nothing is more important than earnings growth, as surging profit levels is what most investors are after. For growth investors, double-digit earnings growth is highly preferable, as it is often perceived as an indication of strong prospects (and stock price gains) for the company under consideration.

While the historical EPS growth rate for Iamgold is 61.6%, investors should actually focus on the projected growth. The company's EPS is expected to grow 74.3% this year, crushing the industry average, which calls for EPS growth of 64.1%.

Cash Flow GrowthWhile cash is the lifeblood of any business, higher-than-average cash flow growth is more important and beneficial for growth-oriented companies than for mature companies. That's because, growth in cash flow enables these companies to expand their businesses without depending on expensive outside funds.

Right now, year-over-year cash flow growth for Iamgold is 97.9%, which is higher than many of its peers. In fact, the rate compares to the industry average of 6.9%.

While investors should actually consider the current cash flow growth, it's worth taking a look at the historical rate too for putting the current reading into proper perspective. The company's annualized cash flow growth rate has been 26% over the past 3-5 years versus the industry average of 13.1%.

Promising Earnings Estimate RevisionsBeyond the metrics outlined above, investors should consider the trend in earnings estimate revisions. A positive trend is a plus here. Empirical research shows that there is a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

There have been upward revisions in current-year earnings estimates for Iamgold. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has surged 7.2% over the past month.

Bottom LineWhile the overall earnings estimate revisions have made Iamgold a Zacks Rank #1 stock, it has earned itself a Growth Score of A based on a number of factors, including the ones discussed above.

You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

This combination indicates that Iamgold is a potential outperformer and a solid choice for growth investors.

Key Takeaways Morgan Stanley analysts named Nvidia their top semiconductor stock, citing its relatively low valuation and confidence that AI spending will support rapid growth for years to come.The analysts expect Nvidia's GPU Technology Conference later this month will help dispel concerns about market share that have been a headwind for the stock. Nvidia, the one-time poster child of the AI craze, is poised to regain some of its magic, according to some experts. 

Morgan Stanley analysts on Tuesday named Nvidia (NVDA) their top semiconductor pick, citing an attractive valuation and a belief that conviction in the stock is primed to bounce back. 

Nvidia was last Morgan Stanley’s top semis pick in September, when the firm transferred that title to memory device maker Sandisk (SNDK) amid a surge in demand for data center storage solutions. Sandisk was replaced by memory chip maker Micron (MU) in November. 

Why This Is Important Over the past three years, Nvidia's earnings and stock have, respectively, become bellwethers of AI demand and enthusiasm on Wall Street. Recently, earnings expectations and the stock have diverged, underscoring Wall Street's growing skepticism of AI even as companies spend hand over fist on the technology.

Since making those changes, Sandisk and Micron stocks have skyrocketed while Nvidia has languished. The stock is down about 8% since last week’s blockbuster earnings report, with concerns about market share challenges and the sustainability of GPU demand weighing on sentiment. 

Morgan Stanley’s analysts on Tuesday called Nvidia stock’s forward price-to-earnings ratio of 18x “a surprisingly good entry point” for a stock that they expect is poised to get its groove back. 

Shares have been pressured recently by concerns that hyperscalers like Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon (AMZN) are already spending the most they possibly can on AI infrastructure. The argument goes: Nvidia’s growth can’t accelerate from here because there’s no more fuel in the tank. 

Morgan Stanley does see ways for hyperscalers to up their spending. They can tap financial markets for fresh capital, and they can direct revenues from their rapidly expanding cloud computing businesses back into that business. 

There is also ample evidence that Nvidia’s biggest customers want to increase their investments. Hyperscalers are paying in-full, upfront on 3-year memory supply orders, according to the analysts, who ask: “Are they doing that with the intent of slowing spending next year?” 

“There is simply no indication that the current investment cycle has run its course, and there is plenty of evidence that the spenders intend to keep spending for at least a couple more years,” the analysts wrote. 

As for the market share concerns, Morgan Stanley acknowledges that competitors like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and custom chip designer Broadcom (AVGO) are likely to grow faster than Nvidia this year. However, that growth difference is driven more by Nvidia’s dominance in the market—they estimate it captures 85% of all AI chip revenue—than by competitors chipping away at its moat by releasing superior products. It’s easier to double $1 billion of revenue than $100 billion. 

Morgan Stanley expects Nvidia’s GPU Technology Conference later this month will allay Wall Street’s market share worries. They predict the conference will “look very similar to 2024, when we got a full look into NVIDIA's 4 year roadmap and it became clear that this race is not just about the silicon, but also rack and ecosystem development.” 

Trading in Nvidia’s stock so far this year also bears a striking resemblance to the past three years. At the beginning of each of those year, “there was skepticism about the following year, and each time when visibility filled in and we realized the strength was durable, the stock had bursts of outperformance.”

The analysts say that skepticism will prove right one year, but probably not this one.

Do you have a news tip for Investopedia reporters? Please email us at

[email protected]

The GM logo is displayed at the new location of the General Motors Headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., January 12, 2026. REUTERS/Rebecca Cook/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryCompaniesGM restructures used-car sales to compete with online sellers like CarvanaGM network to include non-GM models and older vehicles with warrantiesUsed cars have drawn automakers' attention amid affordability woesDETROIT, March 3 (Reuters) - General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab is ​restructuring how its U.S. dealers sell used vehicles, a bid to compete better with fast-rising ‌online sellers like Carvana (CVNA.N), opens new tab.

The Detroit-based automaker said on Tuesday it is dissolving a long-standing program that helps its dealerships sell used cars with GM-backed warranties. Instead, it is asking retailers to move their pre-owned-vehicle operations under GM’s CarBravo brand, a national, ​online site it launched in 2023.

Stay up to date with the latest news, trends and innovations that are driving the global automotive industry with the Reuters Auto File newsletter. Sign up here.

Starting in June, Chevrolet, Buick and GMC dealers must sign on ​to CarBravo to sell used GM vehicles with factory-backed warranties, the automaker said on ⁠Tuesday. Its fourth brand, the luxury Cadillac line, will continue to use GM’s traditional certified-pre-owned program.

GM says the ​move will increase the number of used cars that flow through its dealership network by adding non-GM models ​and older vehicles – even 15-year-old cars could be backed by a warranty under the new system. Today, the company’s certified-pre-owned programs only include GM vehicles, and typically cover cars of up to five years in age.

The U.S. car business is grappling with ​an affordability problem, with average prices rising faster than inflation during this decade, and that has fueled booming ​used-car demand. About 40 million used vehicles are sold annually in the United States, compared to around 16 million new ‌vehicles sold ⁠annually in the past few years.

For GM and other car manufacturers, used vehicles help generate new-vehicle sales by driving store traffic and allowing buyers to trade in their car for a new one.

“We know these customers that buy certified used vehicles, the propensity for them to come back and buy a new vehicle just ​increases,” said John Fitzpatrick, CarBravo ​program leader.

The emergence of ⁠Carvana, which sells cars online and delivers them without the use of a dealership, ramped up competition across the industry, said Jeremy Robb, chief economist at data ​provider Cox Automotive.

Carvana, which launched in 2013, reported sales of 596,641 vehicles last year. ​GM’s CarBravo ⁠service has sold around 216,000 cars since it began in 2023.

GM said CarBravo is selling cars at a faster rate than its broader certified-pre-owned program, even though fewer than one-quarter of its 3,500 U.S. dealerships sell their cars ⁠through CarBravo.

Andy ​Guelcher, president of Mohawk Chevrolet in upstate New York, said using ​the online selling tool has helped grow his used car sales by 52% over the past two years. “I'm talking to people that ​I've never spoken to before,” he said.

Reporting by Kalea Hall in Detroit; Editing by Mike Colias and Andrea Ricci

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Kalea Hall reports on the automotive industry, focusing on the Detroit Three automakers, from Detroit. Kalea was previously an automotive reporter at The Detroit News daily newspaper where she covered the auto industry and General Motors for more than five years. She’s been a professional reporter since 2013, when she started at The Vindicator, a daily newspaper in Youngstown, Ohio and her hometown paper. Growing up in an auto plant town inspired Kalea to deeply understand the industry, and helped her report award-winning stories for The Vindicator. At The Detroit News, she worked collaboratively with a team to break news and write comprehensive pieces. Kalea has a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Point Park University in Pittsburgh and a master’s degree in journalism from Michigan State University.

Prothena Corporation plc is maintained at a Hold rating due to mixed phase 2 data and long timelines for key programs. PRTA's leading assets, prasinezumab (Parkinson's disease) and coramitug (ATTR-CM), are in phase 3 trials with primary completion expected in 2029. The Bristol-Myers Squibb partnership provides up to $1.55 billion in milestones and royalties, with BMS-986446 in phase 2 for early Alzheimer's.

NEW YORK, March 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Lakeland Industries, Inc. (“Lakeland” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LAKE) and certain officers. The class action, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and docketed under 26-cv-01501, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired Lakeland securities between December 1, 2023 and December 9, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.

If you are an investor who purchased or otherwise acquired Lakeland securities during the Class Period, you have until April 24, 2026, to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

Lakeland, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells industrial protective clothing and accessories for the industrial and public protective clothing market worldwide.  The Company employs a so-called “small, strategic, and quick” (“SSQ”) mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) strategy to purportedly drive its growth in revenue and profitability.

At the end of November 2023, Lakeland announced its acquisition of New Zealand-based Pacific Helmets NZ Limited (“Pacific Helmets”), a purported leading designer and manufacturer of helmets for the firefighting, wildland firefighting, and rescue markets.  Defendants touted Pacific Helmets’ purported “premium solutions” and said that the Company’s acquisition of it enhanced Lakeland’s product portfolio.

In February 2024, Lakeland announced its acquisition of the related companies Jolly Scarpe S.p.A. (based in Italy) and Jolly Scarpe Romania S.R.L. (collectively, “Jolly”), a purported leading designer and manufacturer of professional footwear for the firefighting, military, police, and rescue markets.  Defendants touted this acquisition as another significant milestone in Lakeland’s expansion efforts, as well as Jolly’s purported strong brand with a well-established reputation for quality and innovative design and manufacturing.

At all relevant times, Defendants represented that Lakeland would realize significant benefits from the foregoing acquisitions in both the near and long term, while touting the Company’s overall SSQ M&A strategy.  Moreover, following the onset of tariff-related market uncertainties in 2025, Defendants consistently represented that the Company was well positioned to weather tariff-related headwinds while continuing to pursue its SSQ M&A strategy.  Indeed, throughout the Class Period, notwithstanding tariff-related headwinds, Defendants made repeated assurances regarding their visibility into Lakeland’s future performance in upcoming quarters, consistently expressing confidence in their financial guidance issued to investors.

For example, in July 2024, Defendants represented that, for Lakeland’s fiscal year (“FY”) 2025,[1] they expected, inter alia, adjusted EBITDA,[2] excluding any material negative impact from foreign exchange (“FX”), to be in the range of $18 million to $21.5 million, and repeatedly reaffirmed that they expected the Company to achieve adjusted EBITDA of at least $18 million in FY 2025 thereafter.

Similarly, in April 2025, Defendants represented that, for Lakeland’s FY 2026, they expected revenue of $210 to $220 million and adjusted EBITDA, excluding any material negative impact from FX, of $24 to $29 million.  Defendants indicated that, notwithstanding tariff-related uncertainties, they had visibility into Lakeland’s future performance by virtue of various purported positive market signals they observed and their widely touted tariff mitigation measures.

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding Lakeland’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Lakeland was experiencing significant, sustained issues with its Pacific Helmets and Jolly businesses, including, inter alia, shipping-related delays, production issues, and slower than expected rollout of new products; (ii) accordingly, Defendants overstated the anticipated and actual positive impact of these businesses on Lakeland’s financial results, as well as the overall strength and quality of Pacific Helmets’ and Jolly’s respective operations; (iii) Lakeland’s business and financial results were significantly deteriorating because of, inter alia, tariff-related headwinds and timing, certification delays, and material flow issues in its acquired businesses; (iv) accordingly, Defendants overstated the strength of their tariff mitigation measures and SSQ M&A strategy; (v) as a result of all the foregoing issues, Defendants’ financial guidance was unreliable; and (vi) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

The truth began to emerge on September 4, 2024, when, during post-market hours, Lakeland issued a press release reporting its financial results for the second quarter (“Q2”) of its FY 2025.  Among other results, Lakeland reported revenue of $38.51 million for the quarter, missing consensus estimates by $1.39 million.  Defendant James M. Jenkins (“Jenkins”), the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and Executive Chairman, revealed “the shortfall was due to shipment timing,” and that, inter alia, Jolly had “substantial fire orders delayed to the late third and early fourth quarter.”

On this news, Lakeland’s stock price fell $1.86 per share, or 7.82%, to close at $21.92 per share on September 5, 2024. 

On April 9, 2025, during post-market hours, Lakeland issued a press release reporting its financial results for its fourth quarter (“Q4”) and FY of 2025.  Among other results, Lakeland reported Q4 GAAP[3] earnings per share (“EPS”) of -$2.42, missing consensus estimates by $2.80, and FY 2025 adjusted EBITDA, excluding FX losses, of only $17.4 million—significantly below Defendants’ repeatedly reiterated guidance of EBITDA of at least $18 million.  Defendant Jenkins blamed these disappointing results on, inter alia, “a large Jolly fire boots order that was initially expected to ship in Q2 of FY25 [that] has now slipped into FY26,” “weakness . . . at Pacific Helmets resulting from production issues and product offering updates[,]” and “slower than expected” “rollout of new products from Pacific Helmets and Jolly Boots[.]”

On this news, Lakeland’s stock price fell $2.63 per share, or 14.33%, to close at $15.72 per share on April 10, 2025.

Then, on June 9, 2025, during post-market hours, Lakeland issued a press release reporting its financial results for the first quarter (“Q1”) of its FY 2026.  Among other results, Lakeland reported Q1 GAAP EPS of -$0.41, missing consensus estimates by $0.60, as well as revenue of $46.74 million, missing consensus estimates by $2.1 million.  Defendant Jenkins blamed these disappointing results on, inter alia, its Pacific Helmets business “resulting from production issues and updates to product offerings[,]” as well as “shipment timing” and “tariff-related delays[.]”  Defendant Roger D. Shannon (“Shannon”), Lakeland’s Chief Financial Officer, attributed the shortfall in adjusted EBITDA in the quarter to, inter alia, “elevated freight costs resulting from tariff-related inventory build, and dilution from acquisitions.”

On this news, Lakeland’s stock price fell $4.29 per share, or 22.16%, to close at $15.07 per share on June 10, 2025.

On September 9, 2025, during post-market hours, Lakeland issued a press release reporting its financial results for Q2 of its FY 2026.  Among other results, Lakeland reported revenue of $52.5 million for the quarter, missing consensus estimates by $2.09 million.  Defendant Jenkins once again blamed these disappointing results on, inter alia, “Pacific Helmets resulting from updates to product offerings and production issues[,]” as well as “continued delays in purchasing decisions due to tariff uncertainty[.]”

On this news, Lakeland’s stock price fell $0.64 per share, or 4.43%, to close at $13.80 per share on September 10, 2025.

Then, on December 9, 2025, during post-market hours, Lakeland issued a press release reporting its financial results for the third quarter (“Q3”) of its FY 2026.  Among other results, Lakeland reported Q3 2026 GAAP EPS of -$1.64, missing consensus estimates by $1.93, and revenue of $47.6 million, missing consensus estimates by $9.05 million, blaming, inter alia, “timing, certification delays, and material flow issues” in its acquired businesses, as well as tariff-related headwinds.  The press release further revealed that Lakeland was withdrawing its previously issued financial guidance for FY 2026 and would not provide financial guidance going forward because the foregoing “challenges have affected our forecasting ability[.]”

The same day, also during post-market hours, Lakeland filed a current report on Form 8-K with the SEC, disclosing that Defendant Shannon’s employment had been terminated.

Following these disclosures, Lakeland’s stock price fell $5.85 per share, or 38.97%, to close at $9.16 per share on December 10, 2025.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered billions of dollars in damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

 Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Danielle Peyton
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]
646-581-9980 ext. 7980

VAT Group AG (VACNY) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Visa Inc. (V) Presents at Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference 2026 Transcript

Investors with an interest in Banks - Foreign stocks have likely encountered both HSBC (HSBC - Free Report) and Banco Santander-Chile (BSAC - Free Report) . But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now? We'll need to take a closer look.

There are plenty of strategies for discovering value stocks, but we have found that pairing a strong Zacks Rank with an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system produces the best returns. The Zacks Rank favors stocks with strong earnings estimate revision trends, and our Style Scores highlight companies with specific traits.

Right now, HSBC is sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy), while Banco Santander-Chile has a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold). The Zacks Rank favors stocks that have recently seen positive revisions to their earnings estimates, so investors should rest assured that HSBC has an improving earnings outlook. But this is only part of the picture for value investors.

Value investors also try to analyze a wide range of traditional figures and metrics to help determine whether a company is undervalued at its current share price levels.

Our Value category grades stocks based on a number of key metrics, including the tried-and-true P/E ratio, the P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share, as well as a variety of other fundamentals that value investors frequently use.

HSBC currently has a forward P/E ratio of 11.53, while BSAC has a forward P/E of 12.84. We also note that HSBC has a PEG ratio of 0.97. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. BSAC currently has a PEG ratio of 1.08.

Another notable valuation metric for HSBC is its P/B ratio of 1.5. The P/B is a method of comparing a stock's market value to its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. By comparison, BSAC has a P/B of 3.3.

These are just a few of the metrics contributing to HSBC's Value grade of B and BSAC's Value grade of C.

HSBC is currently sporting an improving earnings outlook, which makes it stick out in our Zacks Rank model. And, based on the above valuation metrics, we feel that HSBC is likely the superior value option right now.

12.26K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in CRDO over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. (DOC) Citi's Miami Global Property CEO Conference 2026 March 3, 2026 9:35 AM EST

Company Participants

Scott Brinker - President, CEO & Director
Kelvin Moses - Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Seth Bergey - Citigroup Inc., Research Division

Presentation

Seth Bergey
Citigroup Inc., Research Division

Welcome to Day 2 of Citi's 2026 Global Property CEO Conference. I'm Seth Bergey with Citi Research, and we're pleased to have with us Healthpeak Properties and CEO, Scott Brinker. This session is for Citi clients only, and disclosures have been made available at the corporate access desk. To ask a question, you can raise your hand or go to liveqa.com and enter code GPC26 to submit questions.

Scott, we'll turn it over to you to introduce your company and team, provide any opening remarks and tell the audience the top reasons an investor should buy your stock today, and then we can get into Q&A.

Scott Brinker
President, CEO & Director

In any event, now we're live. I'm going to introduce Kelvin Moses, our CFO; and Andrew Johns, our SVP of Investor Relations and Finance. And we've got John Thomas, our Vice Chairman in the audience as well. John, you're welcome to come up here if you want. All right. So we continue to take bold, decisive actions across our 3 business segments to position Healthpeak for success. Last year marked the successful completion of our merger integration with Physicians Realty Trust. Outpatient medical is now 50% of our portfolio income and the fundamentals, they have never been stronger in that business.

We delivered $70 million in synergies. Most mergers fail. This one was a remarkable success. And really with the merger as a launchpad, we successfully internalized property management across nearly our entire life science and outpatient medical portfolio. And our people are now on

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) Presents at Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference 2026 Transcript

The Progressive Corporation (PGR) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

A market rotation is occurring, providing ballast to some cyclical and defensive sectors. Meanwhile, it highlights departures from previously beloved groups such as technology. Those are the breaks when a slew of software stocks tumble on artificial intelligence (AI) fears and geopolitical concerns boost energy and commodities prices, among other factors. That doesn’t mean that investors should forsake growth sectors in wholesale fashion. However, there’s now a premium on that access. With that in mind, the NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) may be an example of an ETF right for these times.

As an options-based, income-generating ETF, QQQI has the ability to capture some of the upside in the Nasdaq 100 Index in a rebound scenario. Indeed, some experts now view the technology and consumer discretionary sectors as undervalued. Those groups combine for nearly 82% of the Nasdaq 100’s weight.

QQQI Pays Investors to Wait For some investors, waiting on tech stocks to get their grooves back is a quagmire. After all, the sector and related traditional ETFs sport low yields. QQQI improves that scenario in significant fashion with a distribution rate of 14.30%, confirming there’s compensation involved for those willing to tempt fate with tech’s now reduced valuations.

“The sector has seen a notable shift toward lower valuations over the past year,” noted Morningstar’s Rachel Schlueter. “At present, 26.03% of all undervalued stocks with Morningstar’s coverage fall within tech, up from 8.91% a year ago and 17.33% just three months ago. In the face of price volatility, two-thirds of today’s undervalued tech stocks are in the software industry.”

Something else adds to the allure of QQQI as an income/valuation play. Some marquee names in the Nasdaq 100, such as Adobe (ADBE) and Facebook parent Meta Platforms (META), are seen as undervalued.

“Mega-cap companies like Meta Platforms are also driving undervaluation in the communications sector, which accounts for 8.9% of today’s undervalued stocks. Like software companies, Meta plans for significant AI-related spending this year,” added Schlueter.

In an odd twist of fate, QQQI’s relationship to an index normally known for being home to richly valued stocks could work in investors’ favor. Many of the sectors that are now overvalued are lightly represented in the Nasdaq 100.

“As value-leaning sectors’ returns have surged this year, their valuations have climbed. As a result, the industrials sector is home to 26.85% of today’s overvalued stocks, up almost 10% since last February and currently the most of any sector,” concluded Schlueter.

For more news, information, and analysis, visit the Tax-Efficient Income Content Hub.

Earn free CE credits and discover new strategies

B2Gold remains undervalued, but I downgrade from Strong Buy to Buy due to a messy Q4 and challenging 2026 guidance. Q4 saw production near guidance, but higher-than-expected AISC ($1,754/oz) and late Fekola shipments impacted results; the balance sheet and buybacks remain solid. 2026 AISC guidance ($2,400–$2,580/oz) appears alarming but is inflated by one-off factors; 2027 should see normalization as Goose ramps and prepay obligations end.

Getting big returns from financial portfolios, whether through stocks, bonds, ETFs, other securities, or a combination of all, is an investor's dream. But when you're an income investor, your primary focus is generating consistent cash flow from each of your liquid investments.

While cash flow can come from bond interest or interest from other types of investments, income investors hone in on dividends. A dividend is the distribution of a company's earnings paid out to shareholders; it's often viewed by its dividend yield, a metric that measures a dividend as a percent of the current stock price. Many academic studies show that dividends make up large portions of long-term returns, and in many cases, dividend contributions surpass one-third of total returns.

Union Pacific (UNP - Free Report) is headquartered in Omaha, and is in the Transportation sector. The stock has seen a price change of 15.41% since the start of the year. Currently paying a dividend of $2.76 per share, the company has a dividend yield of 2.07%. In comparison, the Transportation - Rail industry's yield is 0.76%, while the S&P 500's yield is 1.35%.

Looking at dividend growth, the company's current annualized dividend of $5.52 is up 1.5% from last year. Over the last 5 years, Union Pacific has increased its dividend 3 times on a year-over-year basis for an average annual increase of 7.19%. Looking ahead, future dividend growth will be dependent on earnings growth and payout ratio, which is the proportion of a company's annual earnings per share that it pays out as a dividend. Union Pacific's current payout ratio is 47%, meaning it paid out 47% of its trailing 12-month EPS as dividend.

UNP is expecting earnings to expand this fiscal year as well. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 is $12.46 per share, which represents a year-over-year growth rate of 6.86%.

Investors like dividends for a variety of different reasons, from tax advantages and decreasing overall portfolio risk to considerably improving stock investing profits. But, not every company offers a quarterly payout.

Big, established firms that have more secure profits are often seen as the best dividend options, but it's fairly uncommon to see high-growth businesses or tech start-ups offer their stockholders a dividend. Income investors have to be mindful of the fact that high-yielding stocks tend to struggle during periods of rising interest rates. With that in mind, UNP is a compelling investment opportunity. Not only is it a strong dividend play, but the stock currently sits at a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold).

All investors love getting big returns from their portfolio, whether it's through stocks, bonds, ETFs, or other types of securities. However, when you're an income investor, your primary focus is generating consistent cash flow from each of your liquid investments.

Cash flow can come from bond interest, interest from other types of investments, and, of course, dividends. A dividend is the distribution of a company's earnings paid out to shareholders; it's often viewed by its dividend yield, a metric that measures a dividend as a percent of the current stock price. Many academic studies show that dividends account for significant portions of long-term returns, with dividend contributions exceeding one-third of total returns in many cases.

Based in Toronto, Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD - Free Report) is in the Finance sector, and so far this year, shares have seen a price change of 4.31%. The retail and wholesale bank is paying out a dividend of $0.79 per share at the moment, with a dividend yield of 3.2% compared to the Banks - Foreign industry's yield of 2.53% and the S&P 500's yield of 1.35%.

Looking at dividend growth, the company's current annualized dividend of $3.15 is up 5.5% from last year. Over the last 5 years, Toronto-Dominion Bank has increased its dividend 3 times on a year-over-year basis for an average annual increase of 5.24%. Looking ahead, future dividend growth will be dependent on earnings growth and payout ratio, which is the proportion of a company's annual earnings per share that it pays out as a dividend. Toronto-Dominion's current payout ratio is 47%, meaning it paid out 47% of its trailing 12-month EPS as dividend.

TD is expecting earnings to expand this fiscal year as well. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 is $6.87 per share, representing a year-over-year earnings growth rate of 14.88%.

Investors like dividends for a variety of different reasons, from tax advantages and decreasing overall portfolio risk to considerably improving stock investing profits. It's important to keep in mind that not all companies provide a quarterly payout.

Big, established firms that have more secure profits are often seen as the best dividend options, but it's fairly uncommon to see high-growth businesses or tech start-ups offer their stockholders a dividend. During periods of rising interest rates, income investors must be mindful that high-yielding stocks tend to struggle. That said, they can take comfort from the fact that TD is not only an attractive dividend play, but is also a compelling investment opportunity with a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy).

NEW YORK, March 03, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: CRWV) and certain officers. The class action, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, and docketed under 26-cv-00355, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants that purchased or otherwise acquired CoreWeave securities between March 28, 2025 and December 15, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its top officials.

If you are an investor who purchased or otherwise acquired CoreWeave securities during the Class Period, you have until March 13, 2026, to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class. A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com. To discuss this action, contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll-free, Ext. 7980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and the number of shares purchased.

[Click here for information about joining the class action]

CoreWeave purports to be an artificial intelligence (“AI”) cloud computing company and self-described “Hyperscaler”, which its Prospectus (defined below) defined as “a cloud provider or technology company that is capable of delivering computing infrastructure and services at massive scale, typically through large data centers and geographically distributed networks.”

CoreWeave purports to generate substantially all of its revenue from committed long-term contracts providing customers with access to its AI infrastructure and proprietary managed software and application services through CoreWeave Cloud Platform (the “Cloud Platform”). 

CoreWeave recognizes revenue from such contracts only once it completes installation of the infrastructure necessary to provide its customers with access to the Cloud Platform, including the data centers that house the hardware on which its proprietary software runs. Such data centers are also known as “powered shells.” After executing a committed contract and receiving a prepayment from its customer, CoreWeave purchases infrastructure components and installs systems necessary to provide its contracted services. Only after the necessary system infrastructure installation is complete and a contract goes live does CoreWeave recognize revenue from the contract.

CoreWeave’s Cloud Platform is hosted in its distributed network of active purpose-built data centers. Without these underlying data centers, CoreWeave is unable to sell its services to customers or recognize revenue from committed long-term contracts for its services. 

On March 10, 2025, less than three weeks before CoreWeave conducted its initial public offering (“IPO”), the Company announced a deal worth up to $11.9 billion to deliver AI infrastructure to Open AI, a leading AI company. This announcement served only to bolster investors’ anticipation of CoreWeave’s IPO.

On March 28, 2025, CoreWeave conducted its IPO, selling 37.5 million shares of common stock priced at $40.00 per share and raising $1.5 billion (the "Prospectus"). 

On March 31, 2025, CoreWeave filed a prospectus on Form 424B4 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the IPO.

In the months following CoreWeave’s IPO, its stock price skyrocketed to prices as high as $183.58 on June 20, 2025, a 348.95% increase from the offering price. During this time the Defendants consistently represented to investors that the demand for CoreWeave’s services was “robust” and “unprecedented,” and made positive revenue forecasts in part due to this demand. 

However, constantly looming over CoreWeave was the question of how it could meet this “robust” and “unprecedented” customer demand, given the limitations on the infrastructure underlying its AI services. The data centers necessary to CoreWeave’s Cloud Platform are highly specialized and in certain cases, designed to meet a customer’s bespoke needs. The limitations referenced above arise because only a limited number of suppliers provide the components and materials necessary to construct these specialized data centers and their contents.

Nevertheless, CoreWeave consistently issued positive revenue guidance during the Class Period—even raising its guidance on one occasion, as discussed infra at ¶ 55)— while steadily assuring investors that it was equipped to capitalize on the high customer demand for its AI services.

On July 7, 2025, CoreWeave announced a definitive agreement to acquire Core Scientific, Inc. (“Core Scientific”), one of the largest owners and operators of digital infrastructure for high performance computing in North America, in an all-stock transaction (the “Core Scientific Acquisition”). In its announcement, the Company quoted CoreWeave’s Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Defendant Michael Intrator, as stating the Core Scientific Acquisition enabled CoreWeave to “significantly enhance operating efficiency and de-risk our future expansion, solidifying our growth trajectory.”

The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Defendants had overstated CoreWeave’s ability to meet customer demand for its service; (ii) Defendants materially understated the scope and severity of the risk that CoreWeave’s reliance on a single third-party data center supplier presented for CoreWeave’s ability to meet customer demand for its services; (iii) the foregoing was reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on the Company’s revenue; (iv) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

During market hours on October 30, 2025, Core Scientific announced it had not received enough shareholder votes to approve its merger agreement with CoreWeave and, as a result, terminated the merger agreement.

On this news, CoreWeave’s stock price fell $8.87 per share, or 6.33%, to close at $131.06 per share on October 30, 2025.

Then, after market hours on November 10, 2025, CoreWeave issued a press release reporting its financial results for quarter ended September 30, 2025. Also on November 10, 2025, CoreWeave held a conference call concerning its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 (the “Q3 2025 Earnings Call”). During the Q3 2025 Earnings Call, Defendants announced lowered revenue guidance for 2025, citing “delays related to a third-party data center developer who is behind schedule.”

Then, during market hours on November 11, 2025, Defendant Intrator appeared for an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street,” hosted by Jim Cramer (the “CNBC Interview”). During the CNBC Interview, after Cramer challenged his initial characterization of the delays at issue, Defendant Intrator conceded that the delays implicated not just one data center, but a single data center provider—i.e., that more than one data center owned by the same provider was potentially affected.

On this news, CoreWeave’s stock price fell $17.22 per share, or 16.31%, to close at $88.30 per share on November 11, 2025.

Then, after market hours on December 15, 2025, the Wall Street Journal published an article reporting new information concerning the data center provider delays, revealing that the scope and severity of data center delivery issues were greater than Defendants acknowledged during the Q3 2025 Earnings Call and the CNBC Interview. The article revealed that weather-related delays would push back the completion date of a Denton, Texas data center cluster intended for OpenAI by several months, that other data centers would be delayed due to revised design plans, that Core Scientific was CoreWeave’s building partner behind the delayed data centers, and that Core Scientific began flagging these delays nine months before CoreWeave announced lowered revenue guidance in November 2025.

On this news, CoreWeave’s stock price fell $2.85 per share, or 3.39%, to close at $69.50 per share on December 16, 2025.

Pomerantz LLP, with offices in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Paris, and Tel Aviv, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, Pomerantz pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, Pomerantz continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered billions of dollars in damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomlaw.com.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT: 
Danielle Peyton 
Pomerantz LLP 
[email protected] 
646-581-9980 ext. 7980