Live financial news intelligence

Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.

Latest market signal Czech
Coverage 241,058 Raw stories ingested 36,675 rewritten in CS_CZ • 0 to rewrite (last 7 days).
Agents 7 waiting Pipeline agents
  • FMP Stock News Fetch every minute 38s ago
  • FMP Forex News Fetch every 5 min 4m ago
  • CoinGecko News Fetch every 5 min 4m ago
  • FIO Stock News Fetch every 10 min 38s ago
  • Patria Stock News Fetch every 10 min 38s ago
  • Editorial rewrite Rewrite every minute 38s ago
  • Asset sync Assets every 1 hour 1m ago

Latest coverage

Market News Feed

Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.

View
Language
Relevance
Details Date Content Source Relevance
2026-07-15 11:52 3mo ago
2026-07-15 08:22 3mo ago
ADA komunita kritizuje přesun TOKEN2049 z EMURGO na Cardano Foundation
ADA Cardano
CoinGecko News 72
Original source text
The ADA community has reacted strongly after Intersect confirmed that responsibility for delivering Cardano’s presence at TOKEN2049 Singapore will shift from EMURGO to the Cardano Foundation.

The decision has sparked a governance debate across the Cardano ecosystem, with several community members arguing that the transfer bypasses the treasury governance process approved by Delegated Representatives (DReps). 

Intersect Explains Why the Cardano Foundation Will Lead TOKEN2049 In a recent announcement, Intersect revealed that EMURGO has been focusing its resources on managing the aftermath of the SecondFi incident. Consequently, the company informed Intersect that it could no longer allocate the personnel required to organize and execute Cardano’s participation at TOKEN2049.

Following discussions among EMURGO, the Cardano Foundation, and Intersect, the three parties agreed to transfer delivery responsibility for the event to the Cardano Foundation.

As the administrator of the treasury process, Intersect emphasized that its priority is to ensure approved governance actions are successfully delivered. Therefore, it described the change in the executing entity as the most practical solution, citing the limited time before the October conference and the need to avoid uncertainty surrounding Cardano’s participation.

The controversy traces back to an earlier governance decision. Cardano’s DReps previously approved EMURGO’s standalone treasury proposal requesting 3.3 million ADA to fund an official Cardano presence at TOKEN2049 Singapore. 

Now, Intersect confirmed that the Cardano Foundation would receive the approved funds and execute the project instead.

Community Questions Governance Process Meanwhile, Intersect’s announcement immediately drew criticism from several community members, who argued that the approved proposal specifically authorized EMURGO, not the Cardano Foundation, to execute the project.

Popular DRep Chris O described the decision as a breach of Cardano’s governance framework. According to him, DReps approved a proposal that explicitly assigned execution to EMURGO. Therefore, if EMURGO could no longer fulfill its obligations, the treasury funds should have been returned rather than reassigned to another entity.

Chris also argued that the Cardano Foundation should submit its own treasury proposal if it intends to organize the event. He also criticized what he viewed as Intersect and the Foundation unilaterally changing the terms of an approved governance action without seeking another DRep vote.

Additionally, community member Dramz called for the funds to be returned entirely, expressing frustration with EMURGO’s role in the situation. 

Similarly, another community member questioned why Intersect decided on behalf of the broader Cardano ecosystem. He urged the organization to return the funds to the treasury and allow a fresh governance proposal rather than modify the existing one. 

Just one quick problem with this. The DReps didn’t vote to fund CF to do Token2049. They voted Emurgo. I think it’d’ve been proper to at least seek DReps’ opinions on the swap before it happened rather than telling us about it after the event.

— Kit Willow 𖤍 (@willow_kit) July 14, 2026

Despite the criticism, not everyone opposed the decision. Some Cardano supporters argued that maintaining an official presence at TOKEN2049 outweighs the need to restart the treasury process.

They contend that requiring a new proposal could delay preparations and potentially jeopardize Cardano’s participation in one of the cryptocurrency industry’s largest conferences. From their perspective, transferring execution to the Cardano Foundation ensures the original objective of the approved proposal is achieved despite EMURGO’s operational constraints. 

DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.
2026-07-15 11:39 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:12 3mo ago
Čína registruje Apple Intelligence pro iPhony
AAPL Apple
FMP Stock News 86
Original source text
Item 1 of 2 A man takes images of the new iPhone 17 Pro smartphones as they are displayed at the Apple store in Beijing's Sanlitun area during the start of sales in Beijing, China September 19, 2025. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov/File Photo

[1/2]A man takes images of the new iPhone 17 Pro smartphones as they are displayed at the Apple store in Beijing's Sanlitun area during the start of sales in Beijing, China September 19, 2025.... Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Read more

BEIJING, July 15 (Reuters) - China's cyberspace regulator said on Wednesday ‌that Apple's on-device generative AI service, Apple Intelligence, has been registered for use on iPhones in China, paving the way for the long-anticipated ​rollout of the service in the country.

China requires companies ​to register large language models and generative AI services ⁠with regulators before making them available to the public.

Learn about the latest breakthroughs in AI and tech with the Reuters Artificial Intelligencer newsletter. Sign up here.

Apple Intelligence ​will incorporate capabilities from AI models developed by Baidu and ​Alibaba, a source familiar with the matter said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

The development ​could help bolster Apple's position in China, where consumers have ​been waiting for the rollout of Apple Intelligence.

Alibaba (9988.HK), opens new tab said in a ‌statement ⁠to Reuters that its Qwen model will be integrated into Apple Intelligence across Apple's iPhone (iOS), iPad (iPadOS), Mac (macOS) and Vision Pro (visionOS) operating systems in China.

Apple is also working with Baidu to develop ​Apple Intelligence features ​for Chinese ⁠iPhone users, a Baidu spokesperson said.

The regulator's statement did not give a launch date for ​Apple Intelligence in China.

Apple reported a 24.4% year-on-year increase ​in its ⁠China shipments in the second quarter.

Separately, ZTE's (000063.SZ), opens new tab Nubia-Doubao smartphone model was also registered with the cyberspace regulator.

Nubia is a smartphone brand ⁠owned ​by telecoms equipment maker ZTE, which ​works with ByteDance to produce the AI-focused Doubao smartphone.

Reporting by Ethan Wang, Che ​Pan and Liz Lee. Editing by Tomasz Janowski and Mark Potter

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Liz Lee covers a range of China-related stories from Beijing, including diplomacy, policy, economic data, and extreme weather events. She has reported on breaking news and enterprise stories since joining Reuters in Malaysia. She previously focused on corporate deals and news in Kuala Lumpur, from IPOs to labour issues. Liz is a fellow at the International Strategic Forum and is part of the Oxford Climate Journalism Network. Her work also contributed to a story selected as a Pulitzer Prize finalist, which looked into scam centres in Southeast Asia.
2026-07-15 11:39 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:25 3mo ago
Google žádá soud EU o zamítnutí odvolání proti pokutě za AdSense
GOOGL Alphabet
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
A specially designed Google logo, during the opening of Google's new Artificial Intelligence (AI) centre in Berlin, Germany, March 5, 2026. REUTERS/Annegret Hilse/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

CompaniesLUXEMBOURG, July 15 (Reuters) - Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab unit Google on Wednesday urged Europe's top court to dismiss EU antitrust regulators' appeal against a lower court ​ruling that scrapped a €1.49 billion ($1.7 billion) fine, saying the regulators' ‌arguments were flawed.

The dispute reached the Court of Justice of the European Union after regulators appealed a 2024 General Court ruling that annulled the fine imposed on Google in 2019. ​The lower court cited errors in the European Commission's assessment of ​the case.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

The Commission, the EU's competition watchdog, said Google used ⁠restrictive clauses in contracts with publishers that prevented rivals from placing search ​advertisements on the publishers' websites, reinforcing Google's dominance in online search advertising.

The ​Commission said the practices ran from 2006 to 2016. Google, whose AdSense platform provides search advertising, removed the contested clauses from publisher agreements in 2016.

Google's lawyer, Josh Holmes, rejected ​the Commission's arguments.

"The Commission's new arguments are flawed. The General Court's reasons ​are clear and complete," he told the panel of five judges.

Holmes said the Commission had ‌ignored ⁠evidence showing Google's rivals had substantial opportunities to compete.

Commission lawyer Anthony Dawes criticised the lower court's ruling, saying it imposed an unprecedented obligation on regulators to analyse issues already settled by case law.

"This finding turns case law ​on its head," he ​said, adding that ⁠the lower court's reasoning would effectively treat exclusive clauses as lawful by default.

A court adviser is due to ​issue a non-binding opinion on November 12, with a final ​ruling expected ⁠in the following months.

The AdSense fine was one of four EU antitrust penalties that have cost Google €9.5 billion during its nearly two-decade dispute with the ⁠Commission. The ​lower court's decision to annul the fine ​marked a rare legal setback for the EU watchdog.

The case is C-826/24 P Commission v Google ​and Alphabet (Google AdSense)

($1 = 0.8771 euros)

Reporting by Foo Yun Chee. Editing by Mark Potter

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

An agenda-setting and market-moving journalist, Foo Yun Chee is a 21-year veteran at Reuters. Her stories on high profile mergers have pushed up the European telecoms index, lifted companies' shares and helped investors decide on their next move. Her knowledge and experience of European antitrust laws and developments helped her break stories on Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Apple, numerous market-moving mergers and antitrust investigations. She has previously reported on Greek politics and companies, when Greece's entry into the eurozone meant it punched above its weight on the international stage, as well as on Dutch corporate giants and the quirks of Dutch society and culture that never fail to charm readers.
2026-07-15 11:39 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:45 3mo ago
Amazon investuje miliardy do robotizace skladů v Evropě
AMZN Amazon
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Amazon (AMZN +0.18%) recently announced that it would spend at least €10 billion ($11.4 billion) to modernize its European fulfillment network with robots over the next few years. These robots include Proteus, its fully autonomous warehouse robot; STARK, which picks up heavy bins from conveyor belts and stacks them into carts; and Vulcan, its first tactile-sensing robot that can handle a wide variety of packaging shapes and materials with extreme precision.

Will Amazon's robotics expansion create headwinds for Symbotic (SYM +2.90%), or could it accelerate the automation arms race and drive its stock even higher?

Image source: Getty Images.

What does Symbotic do? Symbotic develops fully autonomous warehouse robots that process pallets and cases. It claims a $50 million investment in just one of its modules (which includes its robots and software) can generate $250 million in savings over 25 years.

Today's Change

(

2.90

%) $

1.23

Current Price

$

43.66

Walmart (WMT 0.94%) is Symbotic's largest customer and one of its top investors. Symbotic generated 85% of its revenue from Walmart in fiscal 2025 (which ended last September), and it holds a contract to automate all of its U.S. regional distribution centers by 2034. Symbotic also acquired Walmart's own robotics division in early 2025, and the two companies are co-developing automated micro-fulfillment systems for individual stores.

Symbotic's other smaller customers include Target, Albertsons, C&S Wholesale, and GreenBox -- a warehouse-as-a-service joint venture it formed with its other major investor, SoftBank.

Why Amazon's move could be great news for Symbotic Amazon's new warehouse robots might initially seem like a threat to Symbotic, since the e-commerce giant could eventually sell its robots to third-party customers to offset its own spending. However, most of Symbotic's revenue still comes from Amazon's top competitor, Walmart, which will likely ramp up its own robotics spending in response to Amazon's accelerated investments.

That automation "arms race" could also drive other retail giants to sign more deals with Symbotic and its industry peers. According to Fortune Business Insights, the warehouse automation market could expand at a 16.1% CAGR from 2026 to 2034 as more of those tailwinds kick in.

From fiscal 2025 to fiscal 2028, analysts expect Symbotic's revenue and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) to grow at CAGRs of 26% and 73%, respectively.

With an enterprise value of $3.2 billion, it still looks undervalued at one times this year's sales and 10 times its adjusted EBITDA. Therefore, this underappreciated robotics stock could still be a great long-term play on the booming warehouse automation market.

Leo Sun has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Symbotic, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-07-15 11:38 3mo ago
2026-07-15 10:56 3mo ago
BNB Foundation spálila 1,6 milionu BNB
BNB BNB
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
The BNB Foundation has officially announced the successful completion of the 36th quarterly BNB token burn by BNB Chain.

Here are the facts and figures from the latest burn:

Total BNB burned:  1,615,827.795 BNB Approximate value in USD around the time of burn: ~$931,702,464 Transaction ID (TXID) for BNB burn: View transactionRemaining to be burned: Check real-time data hereRemaining total supply: 133,166,127.91 BNB*at time of writing 15 July, 2026 at 10:35AM UTC.

What You Need to Know About the BNB BurnBNB is the native coin of the BNB Chain ecosystem, essential for powering its multifaceted Web3 environment. It supports transactions on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), the opBNB L2s, and BNB Greenfield blockchain. Besides transaction fees, BNB serves as a governance token, granting holders the ability to participate in the BNB Chain’s decentralized on-chain governance. Additionally, BNB functions as a strategic reserve asset and enters the radar of more mainstream financial institutions, driving ecosystem growth and incentivizing adoption.  

Following its mainnet launch on April 18, 2019, BNB transitioned from the Ethereum Network to BNB Chain. "Build and Build" is the philosophy behind BNB, reflecting its role in fostering development within the ecosystem. BNB employs an Auto-Burn system to gradually reduce its total supply to 100,000,000 BNB. The burn amount is adjusted based on BNB's price and the number of blocks generated on BSC during a quarter, ensuring transparency and predictability. 

BNB Auto BurnThe BNB Auto-Burn provides an independently auditable, objective process. The figures are reported quarterly, and the mechanism is independent of the Binance centralized exchange. 

This quarter's burn and future burns will occur directly on BSC due to the BNB Chain Fusion. The corresponding BNB amount will be sent to the "blackhole" address: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD.

Note: Due to the recent Lorentz, Maxwell and Fermi upgrades, BSC is producing blocks more frequently, compared with the time when the Auto Burn formula was originally defined. The parameters used in the formula have been adjusted to keep the idea and spirit consistent.

BNB Real-time BurnAdditionally, BNB implements a real-time burning mechanism based on gas fees. BSC validators determine the ratio of gas fees collected in each block, which is burned at a fixed rate. Since the introduction of BEP95, roughly 291K BNB has been burnt under this mechanism.

Further Reading35th BNB BurnDesign Mechanisms of the BNB TokenReal-Time Burning MechanismWhat is BNB Greenfield?What is opBNB?
2026-07-15 11:37 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:34 3mo ago
Mizuho snižuje hodnocení Circle kvůli hrozbě ze strany Open USD
USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Mizuho has downgraded Circle Internet Group from Neutral to Underperform and cut its price target from $85 to $50, citing competition from Open USD.

Summary

Mizuho cut Circle’s price target to $50, warning Open USD could further squeeze stablecoin margins. Open USD shares reserve earnings with partners, challenging Circle’s existing distribution economics around USDC globally. Circle also faces margin pressure from Hyperliquid revenue-sharing terms despite recent federal banking approval milestone. The Japanese investment bank said the stablecoin model could pressure the economics behind Circle’s USDC business.

According to a CoinDesk report, analysts led by Dan Dolev said Open USD “could fundamentally alter CRCL’s business model” by changing how reserve income flows to distributors. Circle shares traded at $62.63 when the report was published.

Mizuho cuts Circle’s 2027 earnings outlook Mizuho raised its estimate for Circle’s distribution and transaction expense ratio in 2027 from 64% to 73%. The bank also lowered its adjusted EBITDA forecast from $1.09 billion to $699 million, about 25% below the analyst consensus cited in the report.

The bank said higher interest rates could support reserve income but may not fully offset pressure from changing stablecoin economics. Its concern centers on how much yield Circle can retain after paying distribution partners, including companies that help USDC reach users and financial platforms.

Open USD challenges the existing stablecoin model Open USD was announced on June 30 by Open Standard, with more than 140 companies participating in its ecosystem. Partners include Coinbase, Mastercard, Stripe and BlackRock. The project says businesses will be able to mint and redeem the stablecoin without fees or artificial volume limits.

Under the model, partners receive reserve earnings after a small management fee covers operating costs. That differs from Circle’s structure, where reserve income is generated before revenue-sharing payments to major distribution partners. As previously reported, Open USD’s announcement raised questions over whether Circle’s own partners could support a rival while continuing to distribute USDC.

Coinbase relationship adds another pressure point Mizuho also pointed to Circle’s revenue-sharing relationship with Coinbase. The bank said the agreement is expected to come up for renegotiation in August, and Coinbase’s participation in Open USD could give it more leverage in future talks.

A separate warning came from JPMorgan. As reported by crypto.news, the bank cut earnings forecasts for Circle and Coinbase after a new USDC revenue-sharing arrangement with Hyperliquid. JPMorgan said the deal could reduce reserve income retained by both companies even if USDC usage grows.

Circle continues to expand USDC infrastructure The downgrade comes as Circle expands its regulatory and payments footprint.Circle data showed USDC circulation at about $73 billion as of July 13, down from $77 billion at the end of the first quarter.

Circle also recently received final approval to establish Circle National Trust. The federally regulated entity will initially focus on digital asset custody for Circle and its affiliates, with possible future services for selected institutional clients.

The company is also expanding USDC use in Asia. JCB and Circle announced a pilot covering cross-border treasury transfers and possible merchant payments in Japan. The project will start with JCB’s internal transfers before the companies assess wider retail payment uses.

Mizuho’s downgrade focuses on Circle’s ability to protect margins as stablecoin competition changes how reserve income is shared. Open USD has not proved it can match USDC’s distribution or liquidity, but its partner-led model creates a new pricing benchmark. Circle’s earnings path will depend partly on USDC supply, interest rates and future revenue-sharing agreements.
2026-07-15 11:37 3mo ago
2026-07-15 07:17 3mo ago
Buffett inicioval investici Berkshire do Alphabet
BRK-A Berkshire Hathaway
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Warren Buffett said Wednesday he — not Berkshire Hathaway's new CEO Greg Abel — was the driving force behind the recent big investment in Alphabet.

"I initiated it," Buffett said in an interview with CNBC's Becky Quick. "I am not doing anything that he doesn't approve of. He's not doing anything I don't approve of. We talk all the time, but he is the decider."

Berkshire first disclosed a stake in Alphabet during the third quarter of 2025 and has dramatically increased its investment since. Last month, the conglomerate invested an additional $10 billion through a private stock purchase.

"The trick in life is to find — I mean investing — is to find businesses that are going to earn high returns on capital for an extended period of time," Buffett said.

Buffett, who stepped down as Berkshire's chief executive earlier this year but remains chairman, said he and CEO Greg Abel continue to work closely together on investment decisions.

This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
2026-07-15 11:37 3mo ago
2026-07-15 04:53 3mo ago
Netflix je letos zhruba o 30 % níže a čelí obavám z klesající sledovanosti diváků
NFLX Netflix
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Shares of streaming giant Netflix (NFLX 0.39%) are down roughly 30% so far in 2026 and off 45% from the peak they touched about a year ago. That decline reflects investors' growing concerns over the durability of its competitive advantages in a crowded media landscape.

Since Netflix no longer publicly reports its subscriber growth numbers, investors will look for other ways to gauge the company's health when it reports second-quarter earnings on Thursday. As one of the leading streaming platforms, engagement is the foundation of its business model. Its ability to raise subscription prices and grow advertising revenue depends on the platform's ability to capture and hold a large share of its subscribers' viewing time.

Image source: Getty Images.

A shift in the attention economy Competition for screen time now comes from all corners of the media world, putting more pressure than ever on Netflix's core business of offering on-demand shows and movies. The alternatives have expanded beyond premium streamers to include everything from live streamers on Twitch to podcasts that consume hours of user time to short-form videos on TikTok to co-creator gaming platforms like Roblox.

This environment makes it harder to maintain audience attention. On the content front, a planned new series from the producers of Stranger Things was recently canceled, and some popular returning Netflix shows have reportedly drawn smaller audiences in their second seasons.

When the company reports this week, investors will be watching the trajectory of revenue growth and margin expansion. However, management's response to a recent Wall Street Journal article that reported on the company's internal concerns regarding member engagement will likely take center stage.

Pressure on pricing power and ad growth While Netflix remains profitable, a sustained decline in engagement would weigh on its ability to push through periodic price increases in the years ahead. It could also cap the growth of its ad-supported subscription tier.

The company's ad revenue is expected to double this year to roughly $3 billion, but that is still only about 6% of total sales. For the ad tier to become a more meaningful contributor, it needs a large and engaged audience.

Today's Change

(

-0.39

%) $

-0.29

Current Price

$

73.55

Management is exploring ways to counter the trend, including adding live channels and bundling other streaming services. These moves would be a significant shift for the company. The upcoming earnings call will be an important opportunity for management to address the engagement narrative and outline its content strategy.

Bryan White has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Netflix and Roblox. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
2026-07-15 11:37 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:25 3mo ago
Bank of America zvyšuje výhled čistého úrokového výnosu a provozní páku
BAC Bank of America
FMP Stock News 86
Original source text
Key Takeaways Bank of America expects 2026 NII growth at the high end of 6-8%, backed by loans, deposits and repricing.BAC raised full-year operating leverage guidance to 300-400 basis points after a strong first half.More than 200,000 employees use AI tools as broad segment growth supports stronger earnings power. Bank of America Corporation (BAC - Free Report) used its second-quarter 2026 call to push a forward-looking message rather than simply celebrate a beat. Management framed the quarter as evidence that broad client activity, disciplined expenses and steady balance sheet optimization are translating into stronger earnings power.

That mattered because executives also tightened the focus on what comes next: net interest income at the high end of prior guidance, continued loan and deposit growth, and more operating leverage even as the company keeps spending on technology, marketing and AI tools.

BAC Raises the Bar on 2026 NIIChairman and CEO Brian Moynihan said the quarter showed organic growth across every business segment. Revenues of $31.6 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $30.62 billion and rose 15% year over year. EPS of $1.21 topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.13 and increased 34% from the prior-year quarter. 

The more important takeaway was the outlook. Chief financial officer Alastair Borthwick said Bank of America now expects full-year 2026 net interest income growth at the upper end of its 6% to 8% range, supported by loan and deposit growth, fixed-rate asset repricing and balance sheet optimization.

Borthwick also said the company’s banking book remains asset sensitive, while a 100-basis point parallel shift above the forward curve would add about $1 billion of NII over the next 12 months. That gave investors a clearer sense of the embedded earnings lift management still sees in the core franchise.

Bank of America Defends Deposit StrategyA KBW analyst pressed management on deposit pricing and whether BAC could keep outperforming peers in a higher-for-longer setting. Borthwick’s answer centered on client mix rather than rate competition. He said the company is prioritizing operating accounts and relationship deposits, not chasing rate-sensitive balances.

That response aligned with the quarter’s balance sheet trends. Average deposits rose to $2.02 trillion, the 12th straight quarter of sequential growth, while average loans and leases increased 8% from a year earlier to $1.22 trillion. Average consumer deposits were $957 billion, and Moynihan said spending trends strengthened during the quarter.

Management also sounded constructive on the second-half loan demand. In Q&A, Borthwick said commercial growth remains healthy and card balances are moving toward management’s target pace, reinforcing the view that NII growth is being driven by underlying business activity rather than a temporary market tailwind.

BAC Keeps Leaning Into Operating LeverageMoynihan and Borthwick repeatedly returned to operating leverage as one of the quarter’s defining features. The bank posted 6.6% operating leverage in the quarter, while the efficiency ratio improved 359 basis points from a year ago to 59%.

Borthwick said first-half 2026 operating leverage exceeded 450 basis points, leading management to lift its full-year expectation to 300-400 basis points from prior commentary of more than 200 basis points. He cautioned that second-half comparisons get harder because NII and investment banking were already accelerating in the back half of 2025.

A Bernstein analyst and a Citi analyst both tested whether that leverage outlook implied underinvestment. Moynihan rejected that framing, saying Bank of America is still investing heavily in financial centers, marketing, rewards, digital capabilities and AI, while productivity gains are helping offset some of that spending.

Bank of America Highlights AI and Segment BreadthManagement treated AI as a practical productivity story, not a separate growth narrative. Moynihan said more than 200,000 employees are using AI-enabled capabilities, generating over 400,000 prompts a day, with 300-plus approved AI use cases and 114 live generative AI use cases.

That message was tied directly to execution inside the businesses. Consumer Banking posted 10% net income growth, Global Wealth and Investment Management delivered 42% net income growth on record revenues, Global Banking benefited from a 50% jump in total corporation investment banking fees and Global Markets produced its 17th consecutive quarter of year-over-year sales and trading revenue growth.

In Q&A, management also linked AI enthusiasm to underwriting discipline. Moynihan said the bank is evaluating how AI affects borrowers and industries while also using the technology internally to improve speed, consistency and client coverage. That kept the tone measured even as executives sounded upbeat on the long-term opportunity.

BAC Leaves an Upbeat But Disciplined ToneThe call ended with a management team emphasizing breadth, not a single standout line item. Moynihan pointed to resilient consumers, healthy commercial activity, strong capital markets pipelines and continued capital returns, including $8 billion returned to its shareholders in the quarter through dividends and repurchases.

Borthwick’s closing tone was similarly disciplined. He described activity as healthy across lending, payments, wealth, investment banking and markets, while maintaining that credit quality remains stable and the balance sheet remains a source of strength.

Zacks Signals for Bank of AmericaBAC currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) with a Value Score of C, Growth Score of C, Momentum Score of A and VGM Score of B. Under the Zacks framework, the rank is the first screen because earnings estimate revisions are the most important driver, while Style Scores help refine opportunity by value, growth and momentum characteristics.

That combination points to balanced style characteristics with stronger momentum than value or growth at the moment. The VGM Score of B is constructive, but the Style Score framework is most favorable when paired with Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) stocks. A Zacks Rank can change after earnings as analyst estimate revisions move in response to the just-reported results. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
2026-07-15 11:37 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:44 3mo ago
JPMorgan v EMEA přijme 30 bankéřů
JPM JPMorgan Chase
FMP Stock News 86
Original source text
People arrive to the JPMorgan Chase & Co., headquarters in New York City, U.S., April 1, 2026. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryCompaniesJPMorgan will hire 30 EMEA corporate bankers before year-endLatest sign of US banks seeking more corporate clients in EMEAHeadcount to rise 60% in five years in Middle East, North Africa, Turkey, PolandLONDON, July 15 (Reuters) - JPMorgan (JPM.N), opens new tab has ​launched an expansion of its corporate banking business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa as ‌it seeks to grow income and claim market share from regional and domestic lenders, James Roddy, head of global corporate banking at the U.S. lender, told Reuters.

JPMorgan will hire 30 senior bankers before the end of the year in the region to support the firm's ​initiative to facilitate $1.5 trillion in financing for industries critical to national security, including up to $10 billion of ​its own money, Roddy said.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

The hiring forms part of a push to grow the bank's ⁠business across the EMEA region serving three corporate client groups, namely large-cap, mid-size companies and startups, Roddy said.

"Everything is ​on the table for entering new markets or adding resources where we are already present. We have the full ​support of the board to hire if it will help us better serve a client," Roddy said.

The U.S. banking giant's ambition is the latest sign of American lenders using their balance sheet clout to take more market share from European and other lenders, underscoring how regulatory ​changes and a booming home market have given Wall Street lenders further firepower.

JPMorgan has grown its number of clients ​in EMEA by 25% and revenues by 15% in the last two years, Roddy said, and is aiming to add more ‌as it ⁠expands across the region providing services such as corporate finance, cash management, payments and foreign exchange.

JPMorgan ranks first for European investment banking fees - which will include some though not all corporate banking-related fees - so far this year, up from third place in the same period last year, according to LSEG data, increasing its market share by 1.3 percentage points ​to 7.4%, the most growth ​among the top ten ⁠lenders.

The lender has also doubled its headcount in the Middle East and North Africa, Turkey and Poland over the last two years and will grow total staff numbers by ​a further 60% over the next five years, Roddy said, declining to give specific ​numbers of employees ⁠in those markets.

JPMorgan has particularly stepped up its business and lent more in the Middle East as the turmoil resulting from the U.S.-Iran conflict has seen rivals reduce their risk appetite in the region, Roddy added.

The bank said last October it ⁠would ​invest up to $10 billion in U.S. companies critical to national security and ​economic resilience as part of the broader Security and Resilience Initiative (SRI).

JPMorgan appointed Daniel Rudnicki Schlumberger as its head of SRI for EMEA in June, ​following ex-British politician Chuka Umunna leaving the role for Citigroup.

Reporting by Lawrence White; Editing by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes, Alexandra Hudson

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-15 11:33 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:00 3mo ago
IBM představuje autonomní software pro systémy Power
IBM IBM
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
New IBM Power Autonomous Operations software identifies and resolves capacity constraints up to 15x1 faster than manually performing the operation IBM Bob™ Premium Package for i helps accelerate application development on IBM i Entry-level Power S1112 server helps enterprises innovate at every scale , /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced IBM Power Autonomous Operations, an AI agent that can help continuously monitor Power systems and autonomously resolve issues to keep operations running smoothly. It complements the recently launched IBM Bob™ Premium Package for i, which brings agentic-driven software designed to accelerate application development on IBM i. These capabilities can accelerate building modern applications so enterprises can innovate at the pace required by their business. Additionally, the entry-level Power S1112 server provides a new compact, efficient option powerful enough to run AI inference locally.

IBM Power S1112, a 1-socket, half-wide Power11 server. (Image credit: Thomas Prior for IBM)

IBM PowerS1112, tower chassis form factor. (Image credit: Thomas Prior for IBM) IBM Power has long been IBM's platform for mission-critical enterprise workloads. As AI becomes part of that critical infrastructure, Power is built to support it.  IBM introduced Power11 last year as autonomous IT for the AI era, built for availability, resiliency, and scale across on-premises and IBM Cloud environments. IBM Power Virtual Server is a fully managed cloud service on which enterprises can run AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads while offloading much of the routine management for system operations. Now, IBM is embedding autonomous IT across the Power platform, from code to runtime, with new capabilities and systems.

According to the IBM IBV 2026 Tech Leader Study: Building the IT foundation for agentic AI at scale, by 2027, enterprises expect to deploy an average of 1,661 AI agents—a 38% increase. At that rate, tech leaders are tasked with managing hundreds of thousands of autonomous decisions daily. And manual governance can't keep up with that math.2 Additionally, according to the IBM Institute for Business Value, Enterprise 2030 study, AI is changing what companies do and how they do it.3 Closing that gap in scale requires an IT foundation that can run and optimize itself while teams focus on innovation.

These newly announced capabilities utilize AI agents to build automation directly into IBM Power across operations, security, and application development so clients can innovate with AI while prioritizing control and resilience. Power Autonomous Operations automates running and optimizing systems, with an embedded agent that lets teams manage Power through simple chat-style prompts. IBM Bob Premium Package for i makes IBM i development accessible to a broad range of engineers, expanding who can build and modernize their applications on the platform.

"Enterprises should not need to choose between moving at the speed of AI and keeping their systems stable and secure," said Hillery Hunter, General Manager for IBM Power and CTO, IBM Infrastructure. "We're making Power increasingly self-operating, so the routine work of helping to keep systems available, optimized, and secured can happen autonomously, and our clients' teams can spend their time on innovation instead of upkeep. That's how a business scales AI with control and resilience."

IBM Power S1112: Extending the Capabilities of Power Servers

As enterprises push AI workloads beyond the data center, the IBM Power S1112 is a new one-socket Power11 system built for compact on-prem deployment. The S1112 runs AI workloads locally using Power11 on-chip Matrix Math Acceleration (MMA) for faster inferencing. Power S1112 offers 2x better core performance versus Power S9144 and 3x better core performance versus Power S8145  — with up to 69% greater energy efficiency than the S9146.

To provide clients with the right level of support for this new system, IBM Technology Lifecycle Services is introducing IBM Power Expert Care Premium Essentials, a new incident-focused support tier available exclusively for the Power S1112. Premium Essentials delivers priority access to IBM experts, accelerated response, and intelligent support automation.

IBM Power Autonomous Operations: Managing Infrastructure Through Conversation

IBM Power Autonomous Operations resolves capacity constraint issues up to 15x faster than manual intervention7. Today's enterprise systems can seem to demand constant attention, but manual operations management can make it difficult to manage. IBM Power Autonomous Operations redefines this model by automating and optimizing day-to-day operations across the IBM Power environment. An embedded AI agent that enables natural, conversational interaction can help teams to manage, tune, and streamline their environments without relying on deep domain expertise for every task. The result is a resilient, self-optimizing infrastructure architected to reduce operational burden while accelerating performance and uptime.

IBM Bob Premium Package for i: Making IBM i Development Accessible to More Engineers

IBM i is a fully integrated operating system that remains a vital part of the core business of many companies across major industries, yet modernizing IBM i applications has historically required specialized skills for RPG applications. To help address this challenge, IBM Bob is an AI-powered development assistant that offers an agentic SDLC experience for enterprise developers.

IBM Bob Premium Package for i is engineered to provide built-in support for IBM i conventions and patterns across the full development lifecycle, to help engineers make changes faster, onboard sooner, and evolve applications while prioritizing team capacity along the way. From understanding complex code to moving modernization and AI projects forward, IBM Bob can expand the pool of developers who improve the IBM i applications that organizations depend on every day. Early adopters are already seeing results: Heartland Co-Op estimates 60% faster time for new-to-platform developers to understand complex applications.8

Client Momentum

Clients and partners are already running IBM Power on premises and in the cloud, drawn by its performance, resilience, and hybrid flexibility:

"For a business like ours, reliability and simplicity matter because our customers depend on us every day. IBM Power and IBM i have consistently delivered the stability and security we need to support our operations with confidence. And that continues with the introduction of IBM Bob and the IBM Power S1112. What excites me most about the new Power S1112 is the ability to do more with less through increased capacity, energy efficiency, and the growing focus IBM has on automation, making systems easier to manage for small and midsized businesses. We are also excited about how IBM Bob for IBM i can help our team accelerate modernization by quickly interpreting older RPG code, tracing field logic, generating documentation, and making decades of system knowledge easier to understand and act on. Together, IBM Power, IBM i, and IBM Bob give us a forward-looking foundation to modernize with confidence while continuing to deliver the reliability our business depends on." Jasmine Kaczmarek, vice president of technology, M.R. Williams.

"What I noticed about IBM Bob almost immediately was the level of detail provided as compared to other AIs. I like using AI to build and execute plans for specific projects. Given the exact same prompt, Bob's planning was always 10-fold more detailed than other AIs. More specifics, more details, and provided a better understanding of the steps through the project from beginning to end." Bob Richardson, ERP Support Analyst, Wynne Systems, Inc.

"The new IBM Power S1112 provides us with the flexibility to expand beyond traditional workloads and explore new AI opportunities by running Linux partitions alongside our IBM i environment," said Andy Buchholtz, Owner, Innovative Software Solutions. "Combining that flexibility with the security, reliability, and resilience we trust from the IBM Power platform gives us confidence as we continue to innovate and modernize our business."

"We're no longer reacting to weather. We're prepared for it," said Chad Simpson, CIO, City Home. "Our infrastructure is built to keep the business running, no matter what. We've honed our process to perform role swaps every quarter, and this capability gives us great confidence in our business continuity posture. It's a powerful thing, and it's all thanks to IBM Cloud and Power Virtual Server."

Availability

IBM Power S1112 is expected to be generally available on July 24, 2026, IBM Power Autonomous Operations is expected to be generally available on September 23, 2026, and IBM Bob Premium Package for i was made generally available on June 24, 2026. To learn more, visit ibm.com/power.

Statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice and represent goals and objectives only.

About IBM

IBM is a leading provider of global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting expertise. We help clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Thousands of government and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM's hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently and securely. IBM's breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and consulting deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM's long-standing commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity and service.

Additional Sources

Power S1112 and autonomous IT capabilities blog IBM Power S1112 product page  IBM Institute for Business Value Enterprise 2030 study  Media contact:

Sarah Fraser
IBM Infrastructure Communications
[email protected]

1 Disclaimer 1: The performance and capacity management efficiency claim is based on IBM internal testing conducted in a controlled, representative IBM Power infrastructure environment consisting of eleven IBM Power systems. Capacity thresholds and alerting policies were preconfigured prior to test execution. Under this configuration, the manual operational process entailed—navigating to the performance dashboard for each system, exporting performance data to CSV/XLS format, reviewing and analyzing the data to identify required capacity adjustments, and implementing the changes—required on average 52.59 minutes to detect and resolve capacity‑related conditions across the eleven systems. In a comparable scenario, IBM Power Autonomous Operations, which includes alert ingestion and AI-based, agent-driven diagnostic analysis producing recommended and remedial actions with human-in-the-loop approval to remediate, completed the same process in on average 3.33 minutes.
2 https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/c-suite-study/cxo
3 https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030
4 Based on published CPW results comparing Power S1112/4 core to IBM Power S914/4 core. Valid as of 7/14/2026 and available at: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/10c31775c5d40fed
5 Based on published CPW results comparing Power S1112/4 core to IBM Power S814/4 core. Valid as of 7/14/2026 and available at: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/10c31775c5d40fed
6 Based on system capability of Power S1112/10c performance 291,300E CPW (extrapolated from 116,500 CPW for 4-cores) @ 540E Watts (539 Performance/Watt) compared to Power S914/8cperformance of 122,500 CPW @ 383 Watts (319 Performance/Watt); 539 / 319 = 1.69 more Performance/Watt
7 Disclaimer 1: The performance and capacity management efficiency claim is based on IBM internal testing conducted in a controlled, representative IBM Power infrastructure environment consisting of eleven IBM Power systems. Capacity thresholds and alerting policies were preconfigured prior to test execution. Under this configuration, the manual operational process entailed—navigating to the performance dashboard for each system, exporting performance data to CSV/XLS format, reviewing and analyzing the data to identify required capacity adjustments, and implementing the changes—required on average 52.59 minutes to detect and resolve capacity‑related conditions across the eleven systems. In a comparable scenario, IBM Power Autonomous Operations, which includes alert ingestion and AI-based, agent-driven diagnostic analysis producing recommended and remedial actions with human-in-the-loop approval to remediate, completed the same process in on average 3.33 minutes.
8 Heartland Co-op Modernizes Grain Operations with IBM i and IBM Bob

SOURCE IBM
2026-07-15 11:30 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:46 3mo ago
Tradr spustil první 2X short ETF na Applied Optoelectronics a Oracle
ORCL Oracle Corp
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
The first 2X short ETFs on Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle are now available

Funds represent first-to-market inverse strategies on Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle Corporation

, /PRNewswire/ -- Tradr ETFs, a provider of ETFs designed for sophisticated investors and professional traders, today launched two new leveraged ETFs on the stocks of Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle Corporation. The Cboe-listed funds seek to deliver two times short (-200%) the daily performance of their underlying target stocks.

The following ETFs are expected to open for trading today:

Tradr 2X Short AAOI Daily ETF (Cboe: AAOZ) – tracks Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (Nasdaq: AAOI) Tradr 2X Short ORCL Daily ETF (Cboe: ORCZ) – tracks Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) The launch follows the strong adoption of the Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF (AAOX), which began trading on March 24, 2026, and has grown to over $275 million in assets under management. AAOZ now provides active traders with a complementary tool for expressing bearish views or hedging existing positions in Applied Optoelectronics.

"Both Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle have become important AI infrastructure narratives, but they're driven by very different catalysts and can experience significant price swings," said Matt Markiewicz, Head of Product and Capital Markets at Tradr ETFs. "AAOZ and ORCZ give sophisticated traders efficient tools to capitalize on downside opportunities or hedge long exposure without using margin or options. As volatility around AI-related stocks continues, we expect demand for both bullish and bearish trading vehicles to remain strong."

With today's launches, Tradr currently has 74 leveraged ETFs in its lineup. Its strategies can be accessed through most brokerage platforms and allow investors to avoid the hassle of using margin and the complexity of options trading. The firm continues its mission of providing sophisticated investors with innovative trading tools that enhance their ability to express market views with precision and efficiency.

For detailed information on Tradr ETFs and the significant risks involved with leveraged ETFs, please visit www.tradretfs.com.

About Tradr ETFs

Tradr ETFs are designed for sophisticated investors and professional traders who are looking to express high conviction investment views. The strategies include leveraged and inverse ETFs that seek short or long exposure to actively traded stocks and ETFs.

IMPORTANT RISK INFORMATION

Tradr ETFs are for sophisticated investors and professional traders with high conviction views and are very different from most other ETFs. The Funds are intended to be used as short-term trading vehicles and pursue leveraged investment objectives, which means they are riskier than alternatives that do not use leverage because the Funds magnify the performance of their underlying security. The volatility of the underlying security may affect a Fund's return as much as, or more than, the return of the underlying security.

Investors in the fund should: (a) understand the risks associated with the use of leverage; (b) understand the consequences of seeking inverse and leveraged investment results; (c) for short ETFs, understand the risk of shorting; (d) intend to actively monitor and manage their investment. Fund performance will likely be significantly different than the benchmark over periods longer than the specified reset period and the performance may trend in the opposite direction than its benchmark over periods other than that period.

Leverage increases the risk of a total loss of an investor's investment, may increase the volatility of the Funds, and may magnify any differences between the performance of the Funds and their reference security. The Funds seek leveraged investment results for a specific period (daily, monthly or quarterly). The exact exposure of an investment in the Fund intra-period will depend upon the movement of the reference security from the end of the prior period until the time of investment by the investor.

The Fund will not attempt to position its portfolio to ensure it does not gain or lose more than a maximum percentage of its net asset value on a given trading day. As a consequence, investors in a Fund that seeks two times daily performance would lose all of their money if the Fund's underlying security moves more than 50% in a direction adverse to the Fund on a given trading day.

ETFs involve risk including possible loss of the full principal value. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Principal risks and other important risks may be found in the prospectus. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

ETF shares are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the ETF. There can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will develop or be maintained, or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. Buying or selling ETF shares on an exchange may require the payment of brokerage commissions and frequent trading may incur brokerage costs that detract significantly from investment returns.

Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Funds. This and other important information about the Fund is contained in the Prospectus, which can be obtained by visiting www.tradretfs.com. The Prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc, which is not affiliated with AXS Investments or its Tradr ETFs. AXI000994

SOURCE Tradr ETFs
2026-07-15 11:28 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:30 3mo ago
M&T Bank zvýšila čistý zisk i čistý úrokový výnos
MTB M&T Bank
FMP Stock News 92
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- M&T Bank Corporation ("M&T" or "the Company") reports quarterly net income of $818 million or $5.32 of diluted earnings per common share.

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

2Q26

1Q26

2Q25

Earnings Highlights

Net interest income

$        1,792

$        1,752

$        1,713

Taxable-equivalent adjustment

12

11

9

Net interest income - taxable-equivalent

1,804

1,763

1,722

Provision for credit losses

120

140

125

Noninterest income

740

689

683

Noninterest expense

1,349

1,438

1,336

Net income

818

664

716

Net income available to common shareholders - diluted

781

620

679

Diluted earnings per common share

5.32

4.13

4.24

Return on average assets - annualized

1.51 %

1.26 %

1.37 %

Return on average common shareholders' equity - annualized

12.30

9.67

10.39

Average Balance Sheet

Total assets

$     216,532

$     213,828

$    210,261

Interest-bearing deposits at banks

15,061

16,231

19,698

Investment securities

38,728

37,845

35,335

Loans

141,427

138,423

135,407

Deposits (1)

163,524

164,176

163,258

Borrowings

20,794

16,759

14,263

Selected Ratios

(Amounts expressed as a percent, except per share data)

Net interest margin (1)

3.70 %

3.70 %

3.62 %

Efficiency ratio (2)

52.8

58.3

55.2

Net charge-offs to average total loans - annualized

.23

.31

.32

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.52

1.53

1.61

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

.84

.89

1.16

Common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital ratio (3)

10.19

10.33

10.99

Common shareholders' equity per share

$      176.03

$      173.82

$      166.94

(1)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

(2)

A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures is included in the tables that accompany this release.

(3)

CET1 capital ratio at June 30, 2026 is estimated.

Financial Highlights

Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $41 million in the recent quarter as compared with the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an additional day in the recent quarter, higher interest income on nonaccrual loans and growth in average earning assets. The net interest margin remained at 3.70%. A $3.0 billion increase in average loan balances in the recent quarter spanned all loan categories including $2.3 billion of growth in average commercial and industrial loans. Commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2026 increased $1.1 billion from March 31, 2026. Noninterest income in the recent quarter reflects a higher distribution from M&T's investment in Bayview Lending Group LLC ("BLG"), an increase in trust income and a rise in revenues from interest rate swap agreements entered into for commercial customers. The decline in noninterest expense reflects seasonal salaries and employee benefits expense recognized in the first quarter of 2026. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans declined 1 basis point to 1.52% at June 30, 2026. In the recent quarter, M&T repurchased 2.1 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $465 million. M&T's CET1 capital ratio is estimated to be 10.19% at June 30, 2026. Chief Financial Officer Commentary

"M&T generated record earnings per share in the second quarter, reflecting strong contributions from our commercial, retail and institutional services and wealth management businesses. These results reflect the enduring strength of our franchise and the dedication of our employees to making a meaningful difference in the lives of our customers and communities. I want to thank my M&T colleagues. As a result of their commitment, M&T continues to create lasting value for everyone we serve."

- Daryl N. Bible, M&T's Chief Financial Officer

Contact:

Investor Relations: 

Rajiv Ranjan       

716.842.5138

Steve Wendelboe

716.842.5138

Media Relations: 

Frank Lentini   

929.651.0447

 Non-GAAP Measures (1)

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

2Q26

1Q26

Change
2Q26 vs.
1Q26

2Q25

Change
2Q26 vs.
2Q25

Net operating income

$            823

$            671

23 %

$            724

14 %

Diluted net operating earnings per common share

5.35

4.18

28

4.28

25

Annualized return on average tangible assets

1.59 %

1.33 %

1.44 %

Annualized return on average tangible common equity

18.57

14.51

15.54

Efficiency ratio

52.8

58.3

55.2

Tangible equity per common share

$       117.41

$       115.96

1

$       112.48

4

(1)

A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures is included in the tables that accompany this release.

M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a "net operating" or "tangible" basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (and the related goodwill and core deposit and other intangible asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and expenses associated with merging acquired operations into M&T (when incurred), since such items are considered by management to be "nonoperating" in nature.

 Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income (1)

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs.
1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs. 
2Q25

Average earning assets

$     195,216

$     192,594

1 %

$     190,535

2 %

Average interest-bearing liabilities (2)

140,354

136,388

3

132,368

6

Net interest income - taxable-equivalent

1,804

1,763

2

1,722

5

Yield on average earning assets (2)

5.40 %

5.35 %

5.51 %

Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (2)

2.36

2.32

2.71

Net interest spread

3.04

3.03

2.80

Net interest margin (2)

3.70

3.70

3.62

(1)

Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Annualized Taxable-equivalent Rates are included in the accompanying table herein.

(2)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $41 million, or 2%, compared with the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an additional calendar day, higher interest income from nonaccrual loans and growth in average loans in the recent quarter. Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $82 million, or 5%, as compared with the year-earlier second quarter reflecting growth in average loans and investment securities and favorable earning asset and interest-bearing liability repricing, including an improved impact from interest rate swap agreements.

 Average Earning Assets

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs. 
1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs.
2Q25

Interest-bearing deposits at banks

$      15,061

$      16,231

-7 %

$      19,698

-24 %

Investment securities

38,728

37,845

2

35,335

10

Loans (1)

Commercial and industrial

66,069

63,804

4

61,036

8

Real estate - commercial

23,553

23,496

—

25,333

-7

Real estate - residential

25,086

24,817

1

23,684

6

Consumer

26,719

26,306

2

25,354

5

Total loans

141,427

138,423

2

135,407

4

Other

—

95

-100

95

-100

Total earning assets

$    195,216

$    192,594

1

$    190,535

2

(1)

  Supplemental information on loan balances is included in the accompanying table herein.

Average earning assets rose $2.6 billion from the first quarter of 2026 reflecting loan growth and the purchases of investment securities predominantly in the immediately preceding quarter. The increase in average loans reflected broad-based growth in average commercial and industrial loan balances of $2.3 billion and higher average commercial real estate loan balances of $57 million, average residential real estate loan balances of $269 million and average consumer loan balances of $413 million.

Average earning assets increased $4.7 billion from the second quarter of 2025. Average interest-bearing deposits at banks decreased $4.6 billion as liquidity was deployed to originate loans and purchase investment securities. The growth in average loans reflected higher average balances of commercial and industrial loans of $5.0 billion, including growth in loans spanning most industry types, residential real estate loans of $1.4 billion and consumer loans of $1.4 billion. Those increases were partially offset by a $1.8 billion decline in average commercial real estate loan balances, reflecting payoffs.

 Average Interest-bearing Liabilities

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs.
1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs.
2Q25

Interest-bearing deposits

Savings and interest-checking deposits (1)

$       105,752

$       106,570

-1 %

$       103,934

2 %

Time deposits (1)

13,808

13,059

6

14,171

-3

Total interest-bearing deposits (1)

119,560

119,629

—

118,105

1

Short-term borrowings

8,016

5,695

41

3,327

141

Long-term borrowings

12,778

11,064

15

10,936

17

Total interest-bearing liabilities (1)

$       140,354

$       136,388

3

$       132,368

6

(1)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

Average interest-bearing liabilities in the recent quarter rose $4.0 billion from the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an increase in average short-term borrowings from the FHLB of New York and average long-term borrowings from issuances of senior notes and securitizations.

Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $8.0 billion from the second quarter of 2025 reflecting growth in average savings and interest-checking deposits of $1.8 billion and higher average short-term borrowings from the FHLB of New York and long-term borrowings from issuances of senior notes and securitizations.

Provision for Credit Losses/Asset Quality

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs.

1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs.

2Q25

At end of quarter

Nonaccrual loans

$         1,208

$         1,240

-3 %

$          1,573

-23 %

Real estate and other foreclosed assets

23

27

-14

30

-25

Total nonperforming assets

1,231

1,267

-3

1,603

-23

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (1)

603

646

-7

496

22

Nonaccrual loans as % of loans outstanding

.84 %

.89 %

1.16 %

Allowance for loan losses

$         2,176

$         2,136

2

$          2,197

-1

Allowance for loan losses as % of loans outstanding

1.52 %

1.53 %

1.61 %

Reserve for unfunded credit commitments

$               95

$               95

—

$                80

19

For the period

Provision for loan losses

$             120

$             125

-4

$             105

14

Provision for unfunded credit commitments

—

15

-100

20

-100

Total provision for credit losses

120

140

-14

125

-4

Net charge-offs

80

105

-23

108

-26

Net charge-offs as % of average loans (annualized)

.23 %

.31 %

.32 %

(1)

Predominantly government-guaranteed residential real estate loans.

The provision for credit losses was $120 million in the second quarter of 2026 as compared with $140 million in the immediately preceding quarter and $125 million in the second quarter of 2025. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans outstanding was 1.52% at June 30, 2026 and 1.53% at March 31, 2026, improved from 1.61% at June 30, 2025. That improvement reflects lower levels of criticized loans.

Nonaccrual loans were $1.2 billion at each of June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026, compared with $1.6 billion at June 30, 2025. The lower level of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026 as compared with June 30, 2025 reflects a decrease in commercial and industrial and commercial real estate nonaccrual loans.

 Noninterest Income

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs. 
1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs.
2Q25

Mortgage banking revenues (1)

$          127

$          127

— %

$          130

-2 %

Service charges on deposit accounts

144

139

4

137

4

Trust income

197

183

8

182

9

Brokerage services income

35

35

2

31

13

Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains

22

14

61

12

100

Gain (loss) on bank investment securities

2

4

-57

—

—

Other revenues from operations (2)

213

187

14

191

12

Total

$          740

$          689

8

$          683

8

(1)

Supplemental information on mortgage banking activities is included in the accompanying table herein.

(2)

Supplemental information on other revenues from operations is included in the accompanying table herein.

Effective January 1, 2026, the Company elected to prospectively measure its residential mortgage loan servicing right assets at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in mortgage banking revenues. As a result, amortization associated with residential mortgage loan servicing right assets previously recognized in other costs of operations before 2026 is no longer recorded. Instead beginning in 2026, fair value changes in residential mortgage loan servicing right assets, inclusive of the realization of expected net servicing revenues over time, are included in mortgage banking revenues. On December 31, 2025, the Company began economically hedging the risk of fair value changes in these assets through the use of various interest rate derivative contracts, for which changes in fair value are also reflected in mortgage banking revenues.

Noninterest income in the second quarter of 2026 increased $51 million, or 8%, from 2026's first quarter.

Trust income rose $14 million reflecting higher revenues from the Company's institutional services and wealth management businesses, including seasonal tax service fees. Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains increased $8 million reflecting higher revenues from interest rate swap transactions with commercial customers. Other revenues from operations increased $26 million reflecting a $47 million distribution from M&T's investment in BLG in the recent quarter as compared with $33 million in the first quarter of 2026 and higher merchant discount and credit card fees. Noninterest income rose $57 million, or 8%, as compared with the second quarter of 2025.

Service charges on deposit accounts increased $7 million reflecting higher commercial and consumer service charges. Trust income rose $15 million reflecting higher revenues from the Company's institutional services and wealth management businesses. Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains increased $10 million reflecting higher revenues from interest rate swap transactions with commercial customers. Other revenues from operations increased $22 million reflecting a $47 million distribution from M&T's investment in BLG in the recent quarter, partially offset by a $15 million gain on the sale of an out-of-footprint residential builder and developer loan portfolio and a $10 million gain on the sale of a subsidiary that specialized in institutional services each in the second quarter of 2025.  Noninterest Expense

(Dollars in millions)

2Q26

1Q26

Change

2Q26 vs.
1Q26

2Q25

Change

2Q26 vs.
2Q25

Salaries and employee benefits

$          826

$          914

-10 %

$          813

2 %

Equipment and net occupancy

129

133

-2

130

—

Outside data processing and software

154

144

8

138

12

Professional and other services

89

93

-5

86

2

FDIC assessments

18

23

-27

22

-21

Advertising and marketing

27

21

31

25

8

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets

7

9

-26

9

-27

Other costs of operations

99

101

-2

113

-12

Total

$       1,349

$       1,438

-6

$       1,336

1

Noninterest expense declined $89 million, or 6%, from the first quarter of 2026.

Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased $88 million reflecting seasonally higher stock-based compensation, payroll-related taxes and other employee benefits expense in the first quarter of 2026 and lower average staffing levels in the recent quarter, partially offset by the full-quarter impact of annual merit increases and an additional working day in the recent quarter. Outside data processing and software costs increased $10 million reflecting costs associated with enhancements to the Company's technology infrastructure, cybersecurity and financial recordkeeping and reporting systems. Noninterest expense increased $13 million, or 1%, from the second quarter of 2025.

Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $13 million reflecting higher salaries expense from annual merit and other increases and a rise in incentive compensation, partially offset by lower staffing levels in the recent quarter. Outside data processing and software costs rose $16 million reflecting costs associated with enhancements to the Company's technology infrastructure, cybersecurity and financial recordkeeping and reporting systems. Other costs of operations decreased $14 million reflecting the amortization associated with residential mortgage loan servicing right assets in the second quarter of 2025, partially offset by higher expense associated with the Company's supplemental executive retirement savings plan. Income Taxes

The Company's effective income tax rate was 23.1% in the second quarter of 2026, compared with 23.0% and 23.4% in the first quarter of 2026 and the second quarter of 2025, respectively.

Capital and Liquidity

2Q26

1Q26

2Q25

CET1

10.19 %

(1)

10.33 %

10.99 %

Tier 1 capital

11.64

(1)

11.81

12.50

Total capital

13.72

(1)

13.61

13.96

Tangible capital – common

8.07

8.26

8.67

(1)

Capital ratios at June 30, 2026 are estimated.

M&T's capital ratios remained well above the minimum set forth by regulatory requirements. Cash dividends declared on M&T's common and preferred stock totaled $220 million and $35 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. M&T's current stress capital buffer is 2.7%.

M&T repurchased shares of its common stock at a cost of $465 million during the recent quarter, compared with $1.25 billion and $1.08 billion in the first quarter of 2026 and the second quarter of 2025, respectively.

The CET1 capital ratio for M&T was estimated at 10.19% as of June 30, 2026. M&T's total risk-weighted assets at June 30, 2026 are estimated to be $167.9 billion. Reflecting loan growth and share repurchase activity in the recent quarter, M&T's tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio at June 30, 2026 decreased 19 basis points from March 31, 2026 and 60 basis points from June 30, 2025.

While not subject to the liquidity coverage ratio ("LCR") requirements, M&T estimates that its LCR on June 30, 2026 was 106%, exceeding the regulatory minimum standards that would be applicable if it were a Category III institution subject to the Category III reduced LCR requirements.

Conference Call

Investors will have an opportunity to listen to M&T's conference call to discuss second quarter financial results today at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Those wishing to participate in the call may dial (800) 347-7315. International participants, using any applicable international calling codes, may dial (785) 424-1755. Callers should reference M&T Bank Corporation or the conference ID #MTBQ226. The conference call will be webcast live through M&T's website at https://ir.mtb.com/news-events/events-presentations. A replay of the call will be available through Wednesday July 22, 2026, by calling (800) 695-2533 or (402) 530-9029 for international participants. No conference ID or passcode is required. The event will also be archived and available by 3:00 p.m. today on M&T's website at https://ir.mtb.com/news-events/events-presentations. 

About M&T

M&T is a financial holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York. M&T's principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, provides banking products and services with a branch and ATM network spanning the eastern U.S. from Maine to Virginia and Washington, D.C. Trust-related services are provided in select markets in the U.S. and abroad by M&T's Wilmington Trust-affiliated companies and by M&T Bank. For more information on M&T Bank, visit www.mtb.com. 

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release and related conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Any statement that does not describe historical or current facts is a forward-looking statement, including statements based on current expectations, estimates and projections about M&T's business, and management's beliefs and assumptions.

Statements regarding the potential effects of events or factors specific to M&T and/or the financial industry as a whole, as well as national and global events generally, on M&T's business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to the risk that the actual effects may differ, possibly materially, from what is reflected in those forward-looking statements due to factors and future developments that are uncertain, unpredictable and in many cases beyond M&T's control.

Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "target," "estimate," "continue," or "potential," by future conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may," or by variations of such words or by similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict and may cause actual outcomes to differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted.

While there can be no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties is complete, important factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation: economic conditions and growth rates, including inflation and market volatility; events, developments and current conditions in the financial services industry, including trust, brokerage and investment management businesses; changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations, loan concentrations by type and industry, credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans, and other assets; sources of liquidity; levels of client deposits; ability to contain costs and expenses; changes in M&T's credit ratings; domestic or international political developments and other geopolitical events, including trade and tariff policies and international conflicts and hostilities; changes and trends in the securities markets; common shares outstanding and common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; the impact of changes in market values on trust-, brokerage-, and investment management-related revenues; federal, state or local legislation and/or regulations affecting the financial services industry, or M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including tax policy; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and capital requirements; governmental and public policy changes; political conditions, either nationally or in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business; the initiation and outcome of potential, pending and future litigation, investigations and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations and other matters; operational risk events, including loss resulting from fraud by employees or persons outside M&T and breaches in data and cybersecurity; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, regulatory agencies or legislation; increasing price, product and service competition by competitors, including new entrants; technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of products and services; protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers; technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries' future businesses; and material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition, divestment and investment activities compared with M&T's initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated cost savings and revenue enhancements.

These are representative of the factors that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements. In addition, as noted, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either nationally or in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, and other factors.

M&T provides further detail regarding these risks and uncertainties in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, including in the Risk Factors section of such report, as well as in other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and M&T assumes no duty and does not undertake to update forward-looking statements.

Financial Highlights

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions, except per share, shares in thousands)

2026

2025

Change

2026

2025

Change

Performance

Net income

$         818

$         716

14 %

$       1,482

$       1,300

14 %

Net income available to common shareholders

781

679

15

1,401

1,226

14

Per common share:

Basic earnings

5.35

4.26

26

9.49

7.58

25

Diluted earnings

5.32

4.24

25

9.44

7.55

25

Cash dividends

1.50

1.35

11

3.00

2.70

11

Common shares outstanding:

Average - diluted

146,758

160,005

-8

148,424

162,511

-9

Period end

144,933

156,532

-7

144,933

156,532

-7

Return on (annualized):

Average total assets

1.51 %

1.37 %

1.39 %

1.25 %

Average common shareholders' equity

12.30

10.39

10.98

9.37

Taxable-equivalent net interest income

$       1,804

$       1,722

5

$       3,567

$       3,429

4

Yield on average earning assets (1)

5.40 %

5.51 %

5.38 %

5.51 %

Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (1)

2.36

2.71

2.35

2.70

Net interest spread (1)

3.04

2.80

3.03

2.81

Contribution of interest-free funds (1)

.66

.82

.67

.83

Net interest margin

3.70

3.62

3.70

3.64

Net charge-offs to average total net loans (annualized)

.23

.32

.27

.33

Net operating results (2)

Net operating income

$         823

$         724

14

$       1,494

$       1,318

13

Diluted net operating earnings per common share

5.35

4.28

25

9.52

7.66

24

Return on (annualized):

Average tangible assets

1.59 %

1.44 %

1.46 %

1.32 %

Average tangible common equity

18.57

15.54

16.52

14.03

Efficiency ratio

52.8

55.2

55.5

57.8

At June 30,

Loan quality

2026

2025

Change

Nonaccrual loans

$       1,208

$       1,573

-23 %

Real estate and other foreclosed assets

23

30

-25

Total nonperforming assets

$       1,231

$       1,603

-23

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

$         603

$         496

22

Government guaranteed loans included in totals above:

Nonaccrual loans

$           78

$           75

4

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

586

450

30

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

.84 %

1.16 %

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.52

1.61

Additional information

Period end common stock price

$     238.01

$     193.99

23

Full-service domestic banking offices (3)

911

941

-3

Full-time equivalent employees

21,662

22,590

-4

(1)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

(2)

Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. Reconciliations of net income with net operating income appear herein.

(3)

In the first quarter of 2026, thirteen domestic branches formerly classified as full service were designated as limited service per regulatory filings.

Financial Highlights, Five Quarter Trend

Three Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions, except per share, shares in thousands)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Performance

Net income

$             818

$             664

$             759

$             792

$             716

Net income available to common shareholders

781

620

718

754

679

Per common share:

Basic earnings

5.35

4.16

4.71

4.85

4.26

Diluted earnings

5.32

4.13

4.67

4.82

4.24

Cash dividends

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.50

1.35

Common shares outstanding:

Average - diluted

146,758

150,109

153,712

156,553

160,005

Period end

144,933

146,917

151,840

154,518

156,532

Return on (annualized):

Average total assets

1.51 %

1.26 %

1.41 %

1.49 %

1.37 %

Average common shareholders' equity

12.30

9.67

10.87

11.45

10.39

Taxable-equivalent net interest income

$           1,804

$           1,763

$           1,790

$           1,773

$           1,722

Yield on average earning assets (1)

5.40 %

5.35 %

5.47 %

5.60 %

5.51 %

Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (1)

2.36

2.32

2.52

2.72

2.71

Net interest spread

3.04

3.03

2.95

2.88

2.80

Contribution of interest-free funds (1)

.66

.67

.75

.81

.82

Net interest margin (1)

3.70

3.70

3.70

3.69

3.62

Net charge-offs to average total net loans (annualized)

.23

.31

.54

.42

.32

Net operating results (2)

Net operating income

$             823

$             671

$             767

$             798

$             724

Diluted net operating earnings per common share

5.35

4.18

4.72

4.87

4.28

Return on (annualized):

Average tangible assets

1.59 %

1.33 %

1.49 %

1.56 %

1.44 %

Average tangible common equity

18.57

14.51

16.24

17.13

15.54

Efficiency ratio

52.8

58.3

55.1

53.6

55.2

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

Loan quality

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Nonaccrual loans

$           1,208

$           1,240

$           1,252

$           1,512

$           1,573

Real estate and other foreclosed assets

23

27

35

37

30

Total nonperforming assets

$           1,231

$           1,267

$           1,287

$           1,549

$           1,603

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

$              603

$              646

$              561

$              432

$              496

Government guaranteed loans included in totals above:

Nonaccrual loans

78

85

83

71

75

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

586

634

543

403

450

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

.84 %

.89 %

.90 %

1.10 %

1.16 %

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

1.52

1.53

1.53

1.58

1.61

Additional information

Period end common stock price

$         238.01

$         206.72

$         201.48

$         197.62

$         193.99

Full-service domestic banking offices (3)

911

930

942

942

941

Full-time equivalent employees

21,662

21,866

22,080

22,383

22,590

(1)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

(2)

Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. Reconciliations of net income with net operating income appear herein.

(3)

In the first quarter of 2026, thirteen domestic branches formerly classified as full service were designated as limited service per regulatory filings.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2025

Change

2026

2025

Change

Interest income

$   2,620

$   2,609

— %

$   5,156

$   5,169

— %

Interest expense

828

896

-8

1,612

1,761

-8

Net interest income

1,792

1,713

5

3,544

3,408

4

Provision for credit losses

120

125

-4

260

255

2

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

1,672

1,588

5

3,284

3,153

4

Other income

Mortgage banking revenues

127

130

-2

254

248

2

Service charges on deposit accounts

144

137

4

283

270

5

Trust income

197

182

9

380

359

6

Brokerage services income

35

31

13

70

63

11

Trading account and other non-hedging

derivative gains

22

12

100

36

21

74

Gain (loss) on bank investment securities

2

—

—

6

—

—

Other revenues from operations

213

191

12

400

333

20

Total other income

740

683

8

1,429

1,294

10

Other expense

Salaries and employee benefits

826

813

2

1,740

1,700

2

Equipment and net occupancy

129

130

—

262

262

—

Outside data processing and software

154

138

12

298

274

9

Professional and other services

89

86

2

182

170

7

FDIC assessments

18

22

-21

41

45

-10

Advertising and marketing

27

25

8

48

47

1

Amortization of core deposit and other

intangible assets

7

9

-27

16

22

-27

Other costs of operations

99

113

-12

200

231

-13

Total other expense

1,349

1,336

1

2,787

2,751

1

Income before taxes

1,063

935

14

1,926

1,696

14

Income taxes

245

219

12

444

396

12

Net income

$      818

$      716

14 %

$   1,482

$   1,300

14 %

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, Five Quarter Trend

Three Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Interest income

$        2,620

$        2,536

$             2,637

$             2,680

$        2,609

Interest expense

828

784

858

919

896

Net interest income

1,792

1,752

1,779

1,761

1,713

Provision for credit losses

120

140

125

125

125

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

1,672

1,612

1,654

1,636

1,588

Other income

Mortgage banking revenues

127

127

155

147

130

Service charges on deposit accounts

144

139

140

141

137

Trust income

197

183

184

181

182

Brokerage services income

35

35

34

34

31

Trading account and other non-hedging
     derivative gains

22

14

19

18

12

Gain (loss) on bank investment securities

2

4

1

1

—

Other revenues from operations

213

187

163

230

191

Total other income

740

689

696

752

683

Other expense

Salaries and employee benefits

826

914

809

833

813

Equipment and net occupancy

129

133

134

129

130

Outside data processing and software

154

144

146

138

138

Professional and other services

89

93

105

81

86

FDIC assessments

18

23

(8)

13

22

Advertising and marketing

27

21

32

23

25

Amortization of core deposit and other
     intangible assets

7

9

10

10

9

Other costs of operations

99

101

151

136

113

Total other expense

1,349

1,438

1,379

1,363

1,336

Income before taxes

1,063

863

971

1,025

935

Income taxes

245

199

212

233

219

Net income

$            818

$            664

$                759

$                792

$            716

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2025

Change

ASSETS

Cash and due from banks

$         1,939

$         2,128

-9 %

Interest-bearing deposits at banks

15,499

19,297

-20

Investment securities

38,374

35,568

8

Loans:

Commercial and industrial

66,143

61,660

7

Real estate - commercial

24,492

24,567

—

Real estate - residential

25,384

24,117

5

Consumer

27,174

25,772

5

Total loans

143,193

136,116

5

Less: allowance for loan losses

2,176

2,197

-1

Net loans

141,017

133,919

5

Goodwill

8,465

8,465

—

Core deposit and other intangible assets

48

84

-43

Other assets

13,919

12,123

15

Total assets

$     219,261

$     211,584

4 %

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Noninterest-bearing deposits

$       48,295

$       47,485

2 %

Interest-bearing deposits

120,590

116,968

3

Total deposits

168,885

164,453

3

Short-term borrowings

4,614

2,071

123

Long-term borrowings

13,568

12,380

10

Accrued interest and other liabilities

4,248

4,155

2

Total liabilities

191,315

183,059

5

Shareholders' equity:

Preferred

2,434

2,394

2

Common

25,512

26,131

-2

Total shareholders' equity

27,946

28,525

-2

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$     219,261

$     211,584

4 %

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Five Quarter Trend

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

ASSETS

Cash and due from banks

$             1,939

$             1,903

$             1,701

$             1,950

$             2,128

Interest-bearing deposits at banks

15,499

14,445

17,068

16,751

19,297

Investment securities

38,374

38,621

36,649

36,864

35,568

Loans:

Commercial and industrial

66,143

65,391

63,548

61,887

61,660

Real estate - commercial

24,492

23,345

23,819

24,046

24,567

Real estate - residential

25,384

24,857

24,874

24,662

24,117

Consumer

27,174

26,321

26,461

26,379

25,772

Total loans

143,193

139,914

138,702

136,974

136,116

Less: allowance for loan losses

2,176

2,136

2,116

2,161

2,197

Net loans

141,017

137,778

136,586

134,813

133,919

Goodwill

8,465

8,465

8,465

8,465

8,465

Core deposit and other intangible assets

48

55

64

74

84

Other assets

13,919

13,469

12,977

12,360

12,123

Total assets

$        219,261

$        214,736

$        213,510

$        211,277

$        211,584

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Noninterest-bearing deposits

$          48,295

$          45,892

$          46,509

$          44,994

$          47,485

Interest-bearing deposits

120,590

117,849

120,400

118,432

116,968

Total deposits

168,885

163,741

166,909

163,426

164,453

Short-term borrowings

4,614

7,851

2,149

2,059

2,071

Long-term borrowings

13,568

11,175

10,911

12,928

12,380

Accrued interest and other liabilities

4,248

3,997

4,364

4,136

4,155

Total liabilities

191,315

186,764

184,333

182,549

183,059

Shareholders' equity:

Preferred

2,434

2,434

2,834

2,394

2,394

Common

25,512

25,538

26,343

26,334

26,131

Total shareholders' equity

27,946

27,972

29,177

28,728

28,525

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$        219,261

$        214,736

$        213,510

$        211,277

$        211,584

Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Annualized Taxable-equivalent Rates

Three Months Ended

Change in Balance

Six Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

June 30,

June 30, 2026 from

June 30,

Change

2026

2026

2025

March 31,

June 30,

2026

2025

in

(Dollars in millions)

Balance

Rate

Balance

Rate

Balance

Rate

2026

2025

Balance

Rate

Balance

Rate

Balance

ASSETS

Interest-bearing deposits at banks

$   15,061

3.72 %

$   16,231

3.71 %

$   19,698

4.47 %

-7 %

-24 %

$   15,642

3.72 %

$   19,697

4.48 %

-21 %

Investment securities (1) (2)

38,728

4.29

37,845

4.22

35,335

3.80

2

10

38,289

4.25

34,909

3.88

10

Loans:

Commercial and industrial

66,069

6.00

63,804

6.00

61,036

6.40

4

8

64,942

6.00

61,046

6.38

6

Real estate - commercial (1)

23,553

6.27

23,496

6.11

25,333

6.40

—

-7

23,525

6.19

25,794

6.32

-9

Real estate - residential

25,086

4.64

24,817

4.56

23,684

4.52

1

6

24,952

4.60

23,431

4.48

6

Consumer

26,719

6.46

26,306

6.48

25,354

6.57

2

5

26,514

6.47

24,856

6.57

7

Total loans (1)

141,427

5.89

138,423

5.85

135,407

6.10

2

4

139,933

5.87

135,127

6.08

4

Other (1)

—

—

95

3.49

95

3.47

-100

-100

47

—

96

3.47

-51

Total earning assets (1)

195,216

5.40

192,594

5.35

190,535

5.51

1

2

193,911

5.38

189,829

5.51

2

Goodwill

8,465

8,465

8,465

—

—

8,465

8,465

—

Core deposit and other intangible assets

51

59

89

-13

-42

55

90

-39

Other assets

12,800

12,710

11,172

1

15

12,755

10,912

17

Total assets

$   216,532

$   213,828

$   210,261

1 %

3 %

$   215,186

$   209,296

3 %

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Interest-bearing deposits

Savings and interest-checking

      deposits (1)

$   105,752

1.81 %

$   106,570

1.84 %

$   103,934

2.24 %

-1 %

2 %

$   106,159

1.82 %

$   102,741

2.22 %

3 %

Time deposits (1)

13,808

3.02

13,059

3.02

14,171

3.48

6

-3

13,435

3.02

14,140

3.52

-5

Total interest-bearing deposits (1)

119,560

1.95

119,629

1.97

118,105

2.39

—

1

119,594

1.96

116,881

2.38

2

Short-term borrowings

8,016

3.86

5,695

3.86

3,327

4.49

41

141

6,862

3.86

3,100

4.51

121

Long-term borrowings (1)

12,778

5.33

11,064

5.41

10,936

5.70

15

17

11,926

5.37

11,109

5.64

7

Total interest-bearing liabilities (1)

140,354

2.36

136,388

2.32

132,368

2.71

3

6

138,382

2.35

131,090

2.70

6

Noninterest-bearing deposits

43,964

44,547

45,153

-1

-3

44,254

45,294

-2

Other liabilities (1)

4,275

4,245

4,074

1

5

4,259

4,081

4

Total liabilities

188,593

185,180

181,595

2

4

186,895

180,465

4

Shareholders' equity

27,939

28,648

28,666

-2

-3

28,291

28,831

-2

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

$   216,532

$   213,828

$   210,261

1 %

3 %

$   215,186

$   209,296

3 %

Net interest spread (1)

3.04

3.03

2.80

3.03

2.81

Contribution of interest-free funds (1)

.66

.67

.82

.67

.83

Net interest margin (1)

3.70 %

3.70 %

3.62 %

3.70 %

3.64 %

(1)

In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation.

(2)

Yields on investment securities for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2025 reflect $20 million and $18 million, respectively, of lower taxable-equivalent interest income resulting from an alignment of amortization periods for certain municipal bonds obtained from the acquisition of People's United Financial, Inc.

Supplemental Information - Loan Balances

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Commercial and industrial

Commercial and industrial excluding

   owner-occupied real estate by industry:

Financial and insurance

$         13,852

$         13,545

$         12,794

$         12,084

$         12,138

Services

8,559

8,235

7,910

7,689

7,646

Motor vehicle and recreational finance dealers

6,972

7,069

7,191

6,637

6,502

Manufacturing

6,407

6,424

6,112

6,241

6,189

Wholesale

4,343

4,359

4,386

4,246

4,246

Transportation, communications, utilities

4,208

3,937

3,890

3,755

3,807

Retail

3,330

3,316

3,098

3,114

3,079

Construction

2,450

2,311

2,265

2,206

2,275

Health services

1,712

1,841

1,822

1,780

1,879

Real estate investors

1,526

1,668

1,579

1,506

1,314

Other

1,400

1,365

1,303

1,568

1,377

Total commercial and industrial

   excluding owner-occupied real estate

54,759

54,070

52,350

50,826

50,452

Owner-occupied real estate by industry:

Services

2,362

2,377

2,368

2,308

2,402

Motor vehicle and recreational finance dealers

2,180

2,217

2,234

2,162

2,239

Retail

1,926

1,916

1,893

1,825

1,808

Health services

1,464

1,335

1,268

1,320

1,313

Wholesale

1,035

1,029

978

975

951

Manufacturing

712

727

791

783

785

Real estate investors

607

617

616

634

630

Other

1,098

1,103

1,050

1,054

1,080

Total owner-occupied real estate

11,384

11,321

11,198

11,061

11,208

Total commercial and industrial

66,143

65,391

63,548

61,887

61,660

Commercial real estate

Permanent finance by property type:

Apartments/Multifamily

7,124

6,628

6,837

6,548

6,082

Retail/Service

4,259

4,237

4,164

4,320

4,435

Industrial/Warehouse

3,276

2,462

2,297

2,175

2,098

Office

3,147

3,282

3,423

3,487

3,720

Hotel

1,665

1,727

1,743

1,776

1,889

Health Services

1,583

1,507

1,548

1,554

1,669

Other

180

187

180

202

262

Total permanent

21,234

20,030

20,192

20,062

20,155

Construction/Development

3,258

3,315

3,627

3,984

4,412

Total commercial real estate

24,492

23,345

23,819

24,046

24,567

Residential real estate

Residential real estate

25,384

24,857

24,874

24,662

24,117

Consumer

Home equity lines and loans

4,891

4,796

4,807

4,730

4,634

Recreational finance

14,856

14,144

14,092

14,152

13,666

Automobile

4,969

5,016

5,167

5,223

5,260

Other

2,458

2,365

2,395

2,274

2,212

Total consumer

27,174

26,321

26,461

26,379

25,772

Total loans

$       143,193

$       139,914

$       138,702

$       136,974

$       136,116

Supplemental Information - Mortgage Banking Activities

Three Months Ended

Change

Six Months Ended

Change

June 30,

March 31,

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

Amount

%

2026

2025

Amount

%

Residential mortgage banking revenues

Gains on loans originated for sale

$               7

$                8

$       (1)

-9 %

$             15

$            14

$         1

5 %

Loan servicing:

Loan servicing fees

33

32

1

2

65

70

(5)

-6

Changes in fair value of mortgage loan

   servicing right assets, net of hedging activities

(11)

(13)

2

15

(24)

—

(24)

—

Loan sub-servicing and other fees

67

62

5

9

129

95

34

35

Total loan servicing

89

81

8

10

170

165

5

3

Total residential mortgage banking revenues

$             96

$              89

$         7

8 %

$           185

$          179

$         6

3 %

New commitments to originate loans for sale

$           411

$            400

$       11

3 %

$           811

$          612

$     199

33 %

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Balances at period end

Loans held for sale

$               256

$               327

$               441

$               327

$               222

Commitments to originate loans for sale

258

222

224

329

248

Commitments to sell loans

467

544

645

576

407

Capitalized mortgage loan servicing assets

540

542

287

305

326

Loans serviced for others

35,253

35,586

35,873

36,421

36,952

Loans sub-serviced for others

183,599

123,968

156,938

161,785

157,608

Total loans serviced for others

$        218,852

$        159,554

$        192,811

$        198,206

$        194,560

Three Months Ended

Change

Six Months Ended

Change

June 30,

March 31,

June 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

Amount

%

2026

2025

Amount

%

Commercial mortgage banking revenues

Gains on loans originated for sale

$              13

$                18

$       (5)

-28 %

$              31

$              30

$         1

3 %

Loan servicing fees and other

18

20

(2)

-11

38

39

(1)

—

Total commercial mortgage banking revenues

$              31

$                38

$       (7)

-19 %

$              69

$              69

$       —

1 %

Loans originated for sale to other investors

$            746

$           1,135

$   (389)

-34 %

$         1,881

$         2,087

$   (206)

-10 %

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Balances at period end

Loans held for sale

$               259

$               359

$               484

$               278

$               361

Commitments to originate loans for sale

485

529

773

1,074

659

Commitments to sell loans

740

903

1,253

1,292

1,017

Capitalized mortgage loan servicing assets

136

138

132

123

124

Loans serviced for others

31,368

30,934

30,309

28,957

28,416

Loans sub-serviced for others

4,072

4,194

4,231

4,297

4,209

Total loans serviced for others

$          35,440

$          35,128

$          34,540

$          33,254

$          32,625

Supplemental Information - Other Revenues from Operations

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

Change

June 30,

June 30,

Change

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

Amount

%

2026

2025

Amount

%

Letter of credit and other credit-related fees

$             55

$                54

$          1

— %

$           109

$           107

$          2

2 %

Merchant discount and credit card fees

47

41

6

17

88

89

(1)

-2

Bank owned life insurance revenue

20

18

2

5

38

35

3

8

Equipment operating lease income

11

11

—

1

22

25

(3)

-12

BLG income

47

33

14

43

80

—

80

—

Other

33

30

3

11

63

77

(14)

-17

Total other revenues from operations

$           213

$              187

$        26

14 %

$           400

$           333

$        67

20 %

Three Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

(Dollars in millions)

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

Letter of credit and other credit-related fees

$                  55

$                  54

$                    57

$                    55

$                  58

Merchant discount and credit card fees

47

41

46

51

50

Bank owned life insurance revenue

20

18

19

21

17

Equipment operating lease income

11

11

11

12

14

BLG income

47

33

—

20

—

Other

33

30

30

71

52

Total other revenues from operations

$                213

$                187

$                  163

$                  230

$                191

Supplemental Information - Interest Rate Swap Agreements

(Dollars in billions)

June 30, 2026

September 30, 2026

December 31, 2026

March 31, 2027

June 30, 2027

September 30, 2027

December 31, 2027

Fair value hedges:

Active

$         6.1

$             6.1

$             6.1

$          6.1

$         6.1

$             5.1

$             5.1

Cash flow hedges:

Active

16.0

13.7

14.5

14.0

12.7

10.7

9.6

Forward-starting

10.2

5.0

4.2

2.0

—

—

—

Fair value hedges -

   weighted-average fixed rate:

Active

3.56 %

3.56 %

3.56 %

3.56 %

3.56 %

3.66 %

3.66 %

Cash flow hedges -

   weighted-average fixed rate:

Active

3.82

3.62

3.62

3.60

3.64

3.63

3.57

Forward-starting

3.52

3.64

3.65

3.91

—

—

—

Reconciliation of Quarterly GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2026

2025

2026

2025

(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Income statement data

Net income

Net income

$       818

$       716

$    1,482

$    1,300

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1)

5

8

12

18

Net operating income

$       823

$       724

$    1,494

$    1,318

Earnings per common share

Diluted earnings per common share

$      5.32

$      4.24

$      9.44

$      7.55

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1)

.03

.04

.08

.11

Diluted net operating earnings per common share

$      5.35

$      4.28

$      9.52

$      7.66

Other expense

Other expense

$    1,349

$    1,336

$    2,787

$    2,751

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets

(7)

(9)

(16)

(22)

Noninterest operating expense

$    1,342

$    1,327

$    2,771

$    2,729

Efficiency ratio

Noninterest operating expense (numerator)

$    1,342

$    1,327

$    2,771

$    2,729

Taxable-equivalent net interest income

$    1,804

$    1,722

$    3,567

$    3,429

Other income

740

683

1,429

1,294

Less: Gain (loss) on bank investment securities

2

—

6

—

Denominator

$    2,542

$    2,405

$    4,990

$    4,723

Efficiency ratio

52.8 %

55.2 %

55.5 %

57.8 %

Balance sheet data

Average assets

Average assets

$ 216,532

$ 210,261

$ 215,186

$ 209,296

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(51)

(89)

(55)

(90)

Deferred taxes

17

26

18

26

Average tangible assets

$ 208,033

$ 201,733

$ 206,684

$ 200,767

Average common equity

Average total equity

$  27,939

$  28,666

$  28,291

$  28,831

Preferred stock

(2,434)

(2,394)

(2,505)

(2,394)

Average common equity

25,505

26,272

25,786

26,437

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(51)

(89)

(55)

(90)

Deferred taxes

17

26

18

26

Average tangible common equity

$  17,006

$  17,744

$  17,284

$  17,908

At end of quarter

Total assets

Total assets

$ 219,261

$ 211,584

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(48)

(84)

Deferred taxes

17

25

Total tangible assets

$ 210,765

$ 203,060

Total common equity

Total equity

$  27,946

$  28,525

Preferred stock

(2,434)

(2,394)

Common equity

25,512

26,131

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(48)

(84)

Deferred taxes

17

25

Total tangible common equity

$  17,016

$  17,607

(1)

After any related tax effect.

Reconciliation of Quarterly GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures, Five Quarter Trend

Three Months Ended

June 30,

March 31,

December 31,

September 30,

June 30,

2026

2026

2025

2025

2025

(Dollars in millions, except per share)

Income statement data

Net income

Net income

$             818

$             664

$             759

$             792

$             716

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1)

5

7

8

6

8

Net operating income

$             823

$             671

$             767

$             798

$             724

Earnings per common share

Diluted earnings per common share

$             5.32

$             4.13

$             4.67

$             4.82

$             4.24

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1)

.03

.05

.05

.05

.04

Diluted net operating earnings per common share

$             5.35

$             4.18

$             4.72

$             4.87

$             4.28

Other expense

Other expense

$           1,349

$           1,438

$           1,379

$           1,363

$           1,336

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets

(7)

(9)

(10)

(10)

(9)

Noninterest operating expense

$           1,342

$           1,429

$           1,369

$           1,353

$           1,327

Efficiency ratio

Noninterest operating expense (numerator)

$           1,342

$           1,429

$           1,369

$           1,353

$           1,327

Taxable-equivalent net interest income

$           1,804

$           1,763

$           1,790

$           1,773

$           1,722

Other income

740

689

696

752

683

Less: Gain (loss) on bank investment securities

2

4

1

1

—

Denominator

$           2,542

$           2,448

$           2,485

$           2,524

$           2,405

Efficiency ratio

52.8 %

58.3 %

55.1 %

53.6 %

55.2 %

Balance sheet data

Average assets

Average assets

$        216,532

$        213,828

$        212,891

$        211,053

$        210,261

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(51)

(59)

(69)

(79)

(89)

Deferred taxes

17

19

22

24

26

Average tangible assets

$        208,033

$        205,323

$        204,379

$        202,533

$        201,733

Average common equity

Average total equity

$         27,939

$         28,648

$         28,970

$         28,583

$         28,666

Preferred stock

(2,434)

(2,576)

(2,691)

(2,394)

(2,394)

Average common equity

25,505

26,072

26,279

26,189

26,272

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(51)

(59)

(69)

(79)

(89)

Deferred taxes

17

19

22

24

26

Average tangible common equity

$         17,006

$         17,567

$         17,767

$         17,669

$         17,744

At end of quarter

Total assets

Total assets

$        219,261

$        214,736

$        213,510

$        211,277

$        211,584

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(48)

(55)

(64)

(74)

(84)

Deferred taxes

17

18

20

23

25

Total tangible assets

$        210,765

$        206,234

$        205,001

$        202,761

$        203,060

Total common equity

Total equity

$         27,946

$         27,972

$         29,177

$         28,728

$         28,525

Preferred stock

(2,434)

(2,434)

(2,834)

(2,394)

(2,394)

Common equity

25,512

25,538

26,343

26,334

26,131

Goodwill

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

(8,465)

Core deposit and other intangible assets

(48)

(55)

(64)

(74)

(84)

Deferred taxes

17

18

20

23

25

Total tangible common equity

$         17,016

$         17,036

$         17,834

$         17,818

$         17,607

(1)

After any related tax effect.

SOURCE M&T Bank Corporation
2026-07-15 11:24 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:00 3mo ago
Pratt & Whitney nasazuje AI pro inspekce motorů
RTX RTX Corporation
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Enhanced borescope analytics will strengthen global MRO operations for commercial and military engines

, /PRNewswire/ -- Pratt & Whitney, an RTX (NYSE: RTX) business, is expanding its engine inspection capabilities with AI-assisted borescope software through the acquisition and integration of Amsterdam-based Aiir Innovations. This technology enables a step change in how inspections are performed, enhancing consistency and efficiency across global maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) operations for commercial, civil and military engines.

"Broadening the integration of AI-assisted inspection capability strengthens our ability to detect issues earlier, improve turnaround times, increase time on wing and reduce operational disruption for our customers," said Rob Griffiths, senior vice president, Commercial Engines Operations at Pratt & Whitney. "It will fundamentally reshape how engines and components are inspected, maintained and supported throughout their lifecycle, as we increase its application across Pratt & Whitney."

The software assists inspectors by applying artificial intelligence to borescope video to deliver faster, more repeatable assessments. It has already been rolled out to commercial customers and MRO providers, significantly reducing inspection times. Pratt & Whitney has applied the technology on the V2500 engine and recently completed pilots on the GTF and F135 engines, with plans to expand its use across the company.

By adapting to inspector feedback to enhance classification performance over time, the technology becomes smarter, more accurate and increasingly aligned with real-world expertise. It also enables configurable reporting capabilities, allowing processes that once required substantial time to be completed in minutes with greater quality, consistency, traceability and accuracy.

About Pratt & Whitney 
Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a world leader in the design, manufacture and service of aircraft engines and auxiliary power units for military, commercial and civil aviation customers. Since 1925, our engineers have pioneered the development of revolutionary aircraft propulsion technologies, and today we support more than 90,000 in-service engines through our global network of maintenance, repair and overhaul facilities.

About RTX
With more than 180,000 global employees, we push the limits of technology and science to redefine how we connect and protect our world. With industry-leading capabilities, we advance aviation, engineer integrated defense systems for operational success, and develop next-generation technology solutions and manufacturing to help global customers address their most critical challenges. The company, with 2025 sales of more than $88 billion, is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

For questions or to schedule an interview, please contact [email protected].

SOURCE RTX
2026-07-15 11:12 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:19 3mo ago
Elevance zvýšila celoroční výhled upraveného zisku po silném čtvrtletí
ELV Elevance Health
FMP Stock News 92
Original source text
Elevance Health President and CEO Gail Boudreaux listens during a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing examining health insurance affordability and healthcare costs in... Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Read more

CompaniesJuly 15 (Reuters) - Elevance Health (ELV.N), opens new tab ​raised its annual profit forecast after beating second-quarter ‌earnings estimates on Wednesday, as it looks to keep medical costs in check.

In April, the company said it has greater ​clarity on medical costs for the rest ​of the year as it leans on its ⁠efforts to keep them under control.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

"Our second quarter ​results exceeded our outlook," Chief Executive Officer Gail ​Boudreaux said.

Elevance, which has greater exposure to commercial insurance and Medicaid plans for low-income Americans, has been withdrawing from underperforming ​Medicare Advantage markets for older adults.

Higher demand for ​healthcare services among members of government-funded plans has increased medical ‌expenses ⁠for health insurers.

For the quarter, the company reported a medical loss ratio, the percentage of premiums spent on medical care, of 89.7%. Analysts on average ​had expected ​a ratio ⁠of 90.15%, according to data compiled by LSEG.

The health insurer forecast annual adjusted ​profit to be at least $27 per share, ​compared ⁠with at least $26.75 per share projected earlier.

Analysts on average estimate an annual profit of $26.86 per share.

The company ⁠posted ​a quarterly adjusted profit of $7.45 ​per share, surpassing analysts' average estimate of $6.21.

Reporting by Sriparna Roy and ​Sneha S K in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
2026-07-15 11:02 3mo ago
2026-07-15 07:03 3mo ago
Lloyds a Aberdeen provedené tokenizované FX obchody
HBAR Hedera Hashgraph
CoinGecko News 86
Original source text
Lloyds Banking Group, asset manager Aberdeen, and digital asset exchange Archax have completed the United Kingdom’s first foreign exchange (FX) trades backed by tokenized real-world assets as collateral. These transactions were conducted on the Hedera blockchain, using a regulated digital asset framework.

Tokenized collateral supports institutional FX tradesThe pilot project leveraged tokenized shares in Aberdeen’s money market fund and digitized UK government bonds, also known as gilts, as collateral for the FX trades between Lloyds and Aberdeen. Both assets were created in digital form and managed on-chain, representing a new method for handling transaction guarantees in financial markets.

The United Kingdom processes roughly $5.4 trillion in daily FX and interest rate derivatives, placing significant importance on innovations that improve collateral management and efficiency for institutions.

Traditional collateral and margining mechanisms often encounter delays, high costs, and operational friction, particularly during periods of market stress. Many existing workflows rely on manual checks and delayed settlements, making rapid asset movement difficult when it is most critical.

Lloyds, Aberdeen, and Archax piloted a system using regulated, tokenized assets for collateral in the FX market, aiming to address long-standing inefficiencies in collateral movement and reduce operational risks.

In FX markets, firms must quickly move collateral in response to price swings, as any lag can increase pressure and force asset sales. The tokenized model demonstrated by the pilot allowed for near real-time movements, improving liquidity management between financial entities.

Archax issues tokenized assets via Hedera blockchainArchax, the UK’s first FCA-regulated digital asset exchange and tokenization platform, was responsible for issuing, transferring, and safeguarding the tokenized money market fund units and UK gilts on Hedera. This integration connected regulated oversight with blockchain-based asset exchange.

The trial also utilized Archax’s Nest permissioned DeFi collateral transfer network. Permissioned DeFi restricts access to authorized users, enabling financial institutions to explore blockchain features in a secure and compliant context.

The system allowed banks, asset managers, and trading firms to program and transfer tokenized assets on-chain almost instantaneously. This streamlined process reduced the complexity and workload of settlement and margin activities.

Mini dictionary: Archax – A UK-based digital asset exchange and tokenization platform, authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), facilitating the issuance and trading of tokenized securities for institutions.

ParticipantRoleContributionLloyds Banking GroupBankFX trades, collateral participantAberdeenAsset ManagerTokenized money market funds, FX tradesArchaxDigital Asset ExchangeIssuing and custody of tokenized assetsHederaBlockchain NetworkOn-chain settlement infrastructureTreasury report recognizes pilot as industry milestoneThe HM Treasury-backed Wholesale Digital Markets Champion report recognized the pilot as a leading example in the field of digital wholesale markets. It highlighted the project’s demonstration of tokenized collateral as tangible industry progress.

The report examined how to scale digital wholesale markets across the UK, emphasizing projects led by regulated financial firms to advance adoption of blockchain-based solutions. Tokenization of collateral was identified as a key area for innovation and broader adoption.

Allan Trimmer, Head of Product at Aberdeen, emphasized the company’s alignment with Hedera, citing the network’s strengths in transparency, robust governance, and environmental sustainability. He described Hedera as one of the most energy-efficient blockchain platforms available.

Aberdeen highlighted Hedera’s transparency, governance structure, and low energy consumption as deciding factors in its use during the FX collateral pilot.

Hedera provided the necessary technology for fast settlements and institutional-grade blockchain infrastructure, managed by a council of major global organizations. This structure offers both security and scalability for large-scale financial operations.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
2026-07-15 10:52 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:11 3mo ago
SBI a DigiFT spustily na Solaně token japonských akcií
SOL Solana
CoinGecko News 86
Original source text
Japan's First Onchain Equity StrategySBI Global Asset Management and DigiFT have launched the JX Token on Solana, creating what both firms describe as a first for Japan's asset management industry. The product, formally named the SBI Japan High Dividend Equity Strategy Token, is designed to give accredited and institutional investors onchain access to a Japanese high-dividend equity fund strategy managed by SBI Asset Management, a subsidiary of SBI Global Asset Management.

The launch marks the first time a Japanese asset manager's listed-equity strategy has been brought onchain through DigiFT's regulated tokenization and distribution infrastructure. Ecosystem participants in the launch include Solana Company, Huma Finance and Plume.

DigiFT holds Capital Markets Services and Recognised Market Operator licences from MAS, as well as Type 1 and Type 4 licences from the Hong Kong SFC, a dual regulatory standing that has made it a tokenization and distribution partner for global and regional asset managers including UBS Asset Management, Invesco, BNY and Franklin Templeton. Its roster now extends into Japan through SBI GAM's participation, adding a Japanese listed-equity strategy to that lineup for the first time.

SBI's Broader Tokenization Push and the Growing RWA MarketThe launch comes as investor attention returns to Japanese equities, supported by the Tokyo Stock Exchange's continued push for listed companies to improve capital efficiency and demonstrate greater awareness of share-price performance. SBI Holdings itself brings considerable onchain credentials to the partnership. The group has taken direct stakes across the region's tokenization infrastructure, including leading a $50 million investment in Startale Group to build a blockchain purpose-built for tokenized securities, and holding a majority stake in Osaka Digital Exchange, operator of a secondary market for security tokens in Japan.

The JX Token's structure is also designed with the regulatory direction of travel in mind. Regulators are increasingly distinguishing tokenized securities developed with issuer or manager alignment from products that offer only indirect economic exposure. In a joint staff statement issued January 28, 2026, U.S. SEC staff drew a formal line between issuer-sponsored tokenized securities, which can represent true ownership, and third-party products that typically offer only synthetic exposure.

The launch also reflects a broader evolution in tokenization: the value of tokenized RWAs distributed on public blockchains grew from $5.9 billion to $21.9 billion globally in 2025, moving the category beyond cash-like instruments and into actively managed public-market strategies. According to a report by RedStone, Gauntlet and RWA(.)xyz cited by CoinDesk, the RWA tokenization market reached $24 billion having grown 380% in three years.

For $SOL, the deal adds another institutional use case. SBI Holdings recently announced that the Solana Foundation will take an equity stake in SBI R3 Japan, the joint venture it shares with Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, with the entity to be renamed SBI Solana Global. The JX Token launch now gives that broader strategic relationship its first live regulated product on the Solana network.

Sources:
The Manila Times: SBI Global Asset Management and DigiFT Launch JX
CoinDesk: SBI Holdings' Blockchain Initiative Pivots to Solana
CoinDesk: RWA Tokenization Market Has Grown Almost Fivefold to $24B in 3 Years
2026-07-15 10:49 3mo ago
2026-07-15 06:28 3mo ago
Akamai: Commerce čelí útokům AI botů
AKAM Akamai Technologies
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Commerce faces rising AI bot activity, escalating DDoS attacks, and new fraud tactics July 15, 2026 06:28 ET  | Source: Akamai Technologies, Inc.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- An evolution toward agentic commerce and autonomous AI tools has made commerce the world’s most targeted industry by cybercriminals, according to the latest Akamai (NASDAQ: AKAM) State of the Internet (SOTI) security report, Securing the Agentic Storefront: Attacks on Commerce.

The report highlights that, as of December 2025, nearly half (47.9%) of all commerce traffic across Akamai’s global network now consists of AI bots. Furthermore, the industry continues to suffer a relentless barrage of application-layer (Layer 7) distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) activity, malicious web application exploits, and a dangerous narrowing of the gap between traditional application attacks and API-targeted exploits.

“We are securing a digital frontier where the ‘customer’ is increasingly an AI agent operating on behalf of the human user,” said Patrick Sullivan, Chief Technology Officer of Security Strategy at Akamai. “This report reveals how and why security leaders must embrace ‘agentic readiness,’ to architect sites that welcome legitimate AI while aggressively shutting down malicious bots.”

Additional key findings include:

The rise of agentic commerce fraud: Autonomous AI shopping agents are creating a signal masking problem by perfectly mimicking human microbehaviors, according to guest contributor Pam Lindemoen, Chief Security Officer and Vice President of Strategy at RH-ISAC. Threat actors are now using agent hijacking tactics to compromise legitimate AI assistants and abuse stored payment credentials. They are also deploying large language models (LLMs) to create synthetic identity fraud in the form of “Frankenstein” accounts that easily bypass static defenses.The unchecked influx of AI bots: Driven by LLM development, AI training crawlers account for more than 70% of AI bot triggers in commerce. OpenAI, ByteDance, and Anthropic rank as the top three AI bots observed. Commerce organizations placed more than 90% of their AI bot activity in the “monitor” category but allowed three-quarters of the remaining activity to pass unrestricted, exposing themselves to underlying risks.API exposure and vulnerabilities: Web attacks targeting APIs rose by 9% year over year. In fact, Akamai’s 2026 API Security Impact Study revealed that 85% of commerce respondents experienced at least one API-related incident in the past year, yet only 22% know which of their APIs expose sensitive data.Layer 7 DDoS attacks escalate: Commerce was targeted by Layer 7 DDoS attacks nearly 3 trillion times in 2025, with the retail vertical bearing 84% of that volume. Attackers are using HTTP botnets to flood APIs during high-stakes holiday surges and exhaust app servers and halt sales.Industrialized phishing and malware pipelines: Between November 2025 and April 2026, malware represented 56.5% of observed endpoint threat activity, followed by phishing at 37.6%. Average daily phishing volume across commerce customers skyrocketed from 56,600 in February to 134,600 in April, serving as the primary raw material powering account takeover (ATO) and loyalty point theft.
Regional trends

Automated bot activity and web attacks varied by region:

North America and EMEA: These mature markets saw modest bot increases (7% and 16%, respectively) but significant holiday-driven web attacks, with North America leading AI bot activity with 33 billion counts.APAC and LATAM: Bot activity surged by 63% in APAC and 48% in LATAM. APAC’s fragmented travel market and loyalty programs made it a primary target for bot and Layer 7 DDoS attacks.
Mitigation strategies

To effectively counter these evolving threats, Securing the Agentic Storefront: Attacks on Commerce provides a strategic roadmap for CISOs. Recommendations include:

Map the revenue chain: Continuously discover and inventory the API estate to clear up critical visibility gaps regarding sensitive data exposure.Govern automation: Move away from binary “allow/block” models toward risk-based governance that categorizes bots by intent and business value.Minimize the blast radius: Implement microsegmentation to eliminate lateral movement. Although 92% of organizations use basic network segmentation, only 35% have progressed to true microsegmentation.Establish cooperative resilience: Integrate cybersecurity and fraud prevention teams to deploy real-time behavioral biometrics, risk-based multi-factor authentication, and automated kill switches to freeze compromised accounts instantly.
Now in their 12th year, Akamai SOTI Security reports continue to offer critical insights on cybersecurity trends and web performance, drawn from attacks viewed across Akamai’s cybersecurity protective infrastructure, which handles a significant portion of global web traffic.

About Akamai

Akamai is the cybersecurity and cloud computing company that powers and protects business online. Our market-leading security solutions, superior threat intelligence, and global operations team provide defense in depth to safeguard enterprise data and applications everywhere. Akamai’s full-stack cloud computing solutions deliver performance and affordability on the world’s most distributed platform. Global enterprises trust Akamai to provide the industry-leading reliability, scale, and expertise they need to grow their business with confidence. Learn more at

akamai.com and

akamai.com/blog, or follow Akamai Technologies on

X and

LinkedIn.

Contacts
Akamai Media Relations

[email protected] Akamai Investor Relations
[email protected]
2026-07-15 10:23 3mo ago
2026-07-15 10:21 3mo ago
BlackRock zvýšil zisk i tržby nad odhady
BLK BlackRock
FIO Stock News 92
Original source text
15.7.2026 12:21, BLK

Největší správce aktiv na světě BlackRock zveřejnil výsledky hospodaření za druhé čtvrtletí roku 2026. Objem spravovaných aktiv (AUM) překonal průměrný odhad analytiků a dosáhl rekordní hodnoty. Nad odhady byly rovněž výnosy i čistý příliv aktiv.

Výsledky společnosti BlackRock (BLK) za 2Q 2026   2Q 2026 Konsensus 2Q 2026 2Q 2025 Výnosy (mld. USD) 7,08 6,82 5,42 Čistý zisk (mld. USD) 1,91 -- 1,59 Očištěný zisk na akcii (EPS, USD/akcie) 13,91 12,66 12,05 Výsledky za 2Q Objem spravovaných aktiv (AUM) dosáhl rekordních 15,34 bil. USD, meziročně vzrostl o 22 % a překonal odhad 15,19 bil. USD.

Čistý příliv aktiv, zdroj: Blackrock

Čisté přílivy aktiv dosáhly 191,70 mld. USD, výrazně nad odhadem 175,92 mld. USD a nad loňskými 67,74 mld. USD. Z toho dlouhodobé přílivy činily 199,13 mld. USD. Institucionální klienti přinesli čisté přílivy 2,34 mld. USD, retailoví klienti 18,86 mld. USD. Podle typu produktu směřovalo do akciových strategií 71,60 mld. USD a do dluhopisových strategií 92,10 mld. USD.

Výnosy meziročně vzrostly o 31 % na 7,08 mld. USD, nad odhadem 6,82 mld. USD. Základní poplatky a výnosy z půjčování cenných papírů dosáhly 5,73 mld. USD (+29 % meziročně), nad odhadem 5,6 mld. USD. Výkonnostní poplatky (performance fees) činily 305 mil. USD oproti loňským 94 mil. USD, nad odhadem 276,4 mil. USD. Výnosy z technologických služeb dosáhly 566 mil. USD (+13 % meziročně), nad odhadem 551,7 mil. USD.

Celkové náklady vzrostly o 25 % meziročně na 4,62 mld. USD, nad odhadem 4,49 mld. USD.

Provozní marže dosáhla 34,7 % oproti loňským 31,9 %, pod odhadem 35,5 %. Očištěná provozní marže činila 45,9 % oproti loňským 43,3 %, nad odhadem 44,7 %.

Komentář CEO Laurence Fink, předseda představenstva a generální ředitel BlackRocku, uvedl: „Fundamenty trhu jsou silné a dobře podpořené, s vyššími maržemi a momentem v ziskovosti, které katalyzují nové technologie. Rozsah a hloubka našich klientských vztahů globálně nikdy nebyly větší. Klienti se obracejí na BlackRock kvůli poznatkům a příležitostem. To pohání rekordní finanční výkonnost, přílivy 868 mld. USD za posledních dvanáct měsíců a 10% růst organických základních poplatků. Přílivy za prvních šest měsíců roku 2026 více než zdvojnásobily meziroční hodnotu, což posunulo AUM na rekordních 15,3 bil. USD.“

„Ve druhém čtvrtletí nám klienti svěřili 192 mld. USD čistých přílivů, což generovalo 8% organický růst základních poplatků – výrazně nad naším cílem. iShares překročily 6 bil. USD v AUM, což je zhruba dvojnásobek za tři roky. Naše čtvrtletní upravená provozní marže dosáhla 45,9 % – nejvyšší za téměř pět let. Čtvrtletní provozní zisk vzrostl přibližně o 40 % meziročně. A naše přesvědčení o dalším růstu BlackRocku nás vedlo ke zvýšení plánované úrovně zpětných odkupů akcií v roce 2026 na 2 mld. USD,“ dodal Fink.

Návrat kapitálu akcionářům Společnost v aktuálním kvartále odkoupila vlastní akcie v hodnotě 450 mil. USD. Zároveň oznámila zvýšení plánovaných čtvrtletních zpětných odkupů na 550 mil. USD.

Akcie BlackRock Akcie BlackRock (BLK) v předburzovní fázi obchodování rostou o 1,91 % na 1 045,00 USD.

Akcie Blackrock Inc (BLK) před výsledky uzavřely na 1025,44 USD Ukazatel   Ukazatel   Kapitalizace (mld. USD) 167,7 P/E 23,0 Vývoj za letošní rok (%) -4,2 Očekávané P/E 18,9 52týdenní minimum (USD) 917,4 Prům. cílová cena (USD) 1269 52týdenní maximum (USD) 1219,94 Dividendový výnos (%) 2,1 Zdroj: BlackRock, Bloomberg

Michal Šnobl, Fio banka, a.s.
2026-07-15 10:07 3mo ago
2026-07-15 03:55 3mo ago
Růst finančních služeb bude klíčový pro SoFi
SOFI SoFi Technologies
FMP Stock News 72
Original source text
All eyes are on SoFi Technologies (SOFI +2.32%) as it gets ready to report second-quarter earnings. After three blowout years during which it gained roughly 468%, it's down more than 30% so far in 2026.

There are various reasons the market has been disappointed in the stock this year, including its high valuation, a damaging short-seller's report, and a decline in its Tech Platform segment. When it reports second-quarter results on July 29, though, the one thing to look for is the growth in the financial services segment.

Image source: Getty Images.

The financial services segment covers all non-lending products, excluding the Tech Platform, which is a business-to-business platform. These are products like savings accounts and investing tools, and the segment has been growing rapidly.

For a while, financial services' growth was outpacing the lending segment. For example, in the 2025 fourth quarter, financial services revenue increased 78% while lending revenue was up 19%.

Lending has bounced back recently (up 55% year over year in Q1), and at the same time, the financial services segment has decelerated. In the 2026 first quarter, financial services products increased 40% year over year, while financial services revenue was up 41%. Financial services, though, still account for most of the product growth; 89% in the first quarter.

Management is guiding for similar growth for financial services for the full year, although it didn't provide specific second-quarter guidance figures for its segments.

Today's Change

(

2.32

%) $

0.42

Current Price

$

18.55

One thing in SoFi's favor in the second quarter was the Space Exploration Technologies initial public offering (IPO). SoFi was one of five trading platforms that offered retail access to the IPO, and since the IPO was said to have been highly oversubscribed, that should show up in its results.

This is where SoFi's major growth opportunities are as it works to cross-sell products, and this is what investors should be looking at.
2026-07-15 09:30 3mo ago
2026-07-15 04:05 3mo ago
Oklo chce využít použitý jaderný odpad
OKLO Oklo
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Over the last six decades, the United States has accumulated nearly 100,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel. Despite generating about one-fifth of the nation's electricity from nuclear power, the U.S. never established a permanent geological repository for spent commercial nuclear fuel.

This spent fuel could get a second chance if Oklo (OKLO +1.09%) has its way. That's because Oklo's nuclear reactors are designed to efficiently utilize spent nuclear fuel, creating an opportunity to get more from existing nuclear waste.

Here's what investors need to know about Oklo's long-term vision.

Today's Change

(

1.09

%) $

0.50

Current Price

$

46.31

How Oklo plans to get more from nuclear waste When it comes to nuclear energy, used nuclear fuel is not fully depleted or useless material. That's because conventional light-water reactors extract less than 5% of the total energy potential from enriched uranium before the assemblies stop generating power efficiently and are removed. While conventional reactors cannot use the spent fuel, the remaining material still contains large quantities of uranium and other elements that advanced reactor designs could utilize.

Oklo plans to use this spent fuel in its Aurora fast reactor, a compact, advanced reactor designed to operate on high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and recycled nuclear materials. This is possible because fast reactors can more efficiently utilize the heavier isotopes in spent nuclear fuel, enabling closed-loop fuel cycles.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Oklo's initial powerhouses are expected to use fresh HALEU fuel, but in the longer term, the company aims to recycle portions of the country's accumulated used-fuel inventory into new reactor fuel. If it succeeds, it could expand domestic fuel supplies, reduce dependence on newly mined uranium, and lessen the burden of nuclear waste management by producing 90% less high-level waste than conventional reactors.

Oklo's use of recycled nuclear fuel could make it an innovator in the nuclear energy space, and it is investing nearly $1.7 billion to build a nuclear fuel recycling facility in Tennessee. Construction is expected to begin here in 2027, with the facility projected to begin producing recycled fuel by the 2030s.

What's next for Oklo? Oklo is making important progress with its nuclear reactor technology. The company's anchor project is the Aurora Powerhouse located at the Idaho National Laboratory. Here, the company will build a 75-MWe liquid-metal-cooled, metal-fueled reactor and aims to begin operations as soon as 2028.

It also has a major deal with Meta Platforms to build a 1.2-GW clean energy campus in Ohio. It has signed a Letter of Intent (LOI) with Centrus Energy to purchase HALEU fuel for this facility, which is slated to start delivering power in 2030, and the full campus is expected to be completed by 2034.

That said, it has a long road ahead and is vulnerable to regulatory setbacks. On top of that, it will incur significant expenses (it projects $350 million to $450 million in capital expenditures this year) before becoming commercially viable.

For those reasons, Oklo is a speculative stock best left to aggressive investors with a long-term perspective.
2026-07-15 09:27 3mo ago
2026-07-15 05:21 3mo ago
AUD/JPY nad 113 kvůli slabému jenu
AUDJPY AUD/JPY
FMP Forex News 86
Original source text
Summary:

The AUD/JPY pair broke past the 113.00 resistance level following previous quiet six session bounds between 111.95 and 112.81 Yen weakness was fueled by interest rate differences and market confusion over speculation that Japan's massive pension fund might relocate foreign assets back home The Aussie dollar found solid fundamental support as global commodity prices remained firm despite the geopolitical tensions in the Middle East After six sessions trading within a tight range of 111.95 to 112.81, the AUD/JPY pair moved decisively higher on Tuesday. It surpassed the 113.00 psychological level and continued its ascent today, nearing 113.39. So, what changed?

Speculation Over the World’s Largest Pension Fund Triggers Yen Selloff Headlines regarding Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) appear to be the primary driver behind the yen’s recent decline. Reports suggest the government is considering encouraging the massive pension fund to increase its investments in domestic assets to support local markets and the yen. While this sounds like it should strengthen the Japanese currency, the market reacted with immediate skepticism.

This skepticism stems from past attempts by the Japanese finance ministry to support the yen, which proved costly and ineffective.  As CNBC reported, Tokyo’s finance ministry burned through roughly $73 billion defending the yen back in April and May, only to watch it slide right back toward the levels it started from.

Analysts suggest the yen’s weakness is rooted in structural issues. These include Japan’s growing public debt, a government focused on reflation, and inflation expectations that are not aligning with typical interest rate differentials.

On the Aussie side, the Reserve Bank of Australia has hiked its cash rate three times this year to 4.35%. Despite holding rates steady in June, RBA meeting minutes indicated ongoing concerns about inflation exceeding the target, with core inflation accelerating even as headline inflation eased.

A Finder survey of more than 40 economists shows 55% of them expect at least one more rate hike this year, likely in August. This policy stance supports Australian yields and the carry appeal of the Australian dollar.

Commodity prices and China’s economic performance also play a significant role. Australia, as a major exporter of iron ore, coal, and liquefied natural gas, benefits from resilient demand from China. Positive economic indicators from Beijing have bolstered risk sentiment and AUD strength.

Market Outlook Signals Bullish Bias with Caution This breakout suggests a constructive near-term outlook for AUD/JPY, potentially targeting higher levels if policy divergence persists and global risk conditions remain favorable.

For those considering trading this breakout, entering at current levels around 113.40 presents some short-term risk. A sustained move above 113.58 on a daily closing basis would be the next key level to watch, potentially opening the way toward 113.90 and the 52-week high zone around 114.90.

Below the surface, though, this rally is fragile. A significant risk to long positions is the potential for direct market intervention by the Bank of Japan or the Ministry of Finance to support the yen. Such action could lead to a rapid and substantial decline in the AUD/JPY pair.

Why did AUD/JPY break above 113.00 this week?

The breakout was caused by a combination of RBA rate-hike expectations supporting the Aussie and persistent yen weakness tied to Japan’s debt concerns and ineffective currency intervention.

Is the Australian dollar actually getting stronger?

The Australian dollar’s appreciation appears to be more a reflection of yen weakness than a substantial increase in the Australian dollar’s strength, although RBA policy has contributed positively.

How does China’s economy influence Australian dollar strength?

Stronger Chinese demand for commodities like iron ore and coal increases Australia’s export revenues, improving its terms of trade and supporting the AUD.
2026-07-15 09:09 3mo ago
2026-07-15 02:55 3mo ago
Travelers čeká nižší zisk ve 2. čtvrtletí
TRV The Travelers Companies
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE:TRV) will release its second quarter earnings report before the opening bell on Friday, July 17.

Analysts expect the New York-based company to report quarterly earnings of $5.33 per share, down from $6.51 per share in the year-ago period. The consensus estimate for Travelers’ quarterly revenue is $10.99 billion. It reported $10.92 billion last year, according to Benzinga Pro.

On April 16, Travelers Companies reported better-than-expected first-quarter results.

Travelers shares fell 1.4% to close at $336.83 on Tuesday.

Benzinga readers can access the latest analyst ratings on the Analyst Stock Ratings page. Readers can sort by stock ticker, company name, analyst firm, rating change or other variables.

Let’s have a look at how Benzinga’s most-accurate analysts have rated the company in the recent period.

Considering buying TRV stock? Here’s what analysts think:

Photo via Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
2026-07-15 09:01 3mo ago
2026-07-15 03:48 3mo ago
TSMC čeká rekordní zisk, sleduje výhled hospodaření a Nvidii
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor
FMP Stock News 86
Original source text
TSMC is expected to deliver another record profit on Thursday, but investors may need more than strong headline numbers to push the stock higher.

The chipmaker reports at 2 AM ET on July 16. Analysts expect second-quarter net profit to surge 59% to NT$632.6 billion, which would mark a fifth consecutive quarterly record.

Revenue is already known: sales rose 36% to NT$1.27 trillion.

Yet TSMC’s US-listed shares have gained about 38% in 2026, leaving investors focused on third-quarter guidance and whether Nvidia’s next-generation Vera Rubin rollout remains on schedule.

TSMC’s second-quarter revenue narrowly exceeded the NT$1.264 trillion consensus compiled by LSEG, reinforcing the strength of demand for its most advanced manufacturing processes and chip-packaging services.

Any quarterly profit above NT$572.5 billion would set another company record.

The company previously forecast a gross margin of between 65.5% and 67.5%, alongside an operating margin of 56.5% to 58.5%.

Investors will examine whether stronger pricing and high factory utilisation allowed TSMC to reach the upper end of those ranges, particularly as overseas expansion costs continue to rise.

Dan Nystedt, a research analyst at investment firm TriOrient, told Reuters that the revenue performance showed AI demand remained healthy, supporting TSMC’s advanced-node production and chip-on-wafer-on-substrate, or CoWoS, packaging business.

Because TSMC has already disclosed its sales, Thursday’s share-price reaction will probably depend more heavily on profitability and management’s outlook.

Options markets imply that the US-listed stock could move roughly 5% in either direction by the end of the week. The shares closed Tuesday at $420.39.

TSMC manufactures Nvidia’s most advanced AI processors and provides the sophisticated packaging needed to combine GPUs with high-bandwidth memory.

That makes Nvidia’s annual product cadence an important driver of TSMC’s advanced-node utilisation and CoWoS demand.

KeyBanc analyst John Vinh recently flagged a slight delay to Nvidia’s Vera Rubin rollout, citing thermal heat-lid issues and delays involving HBM4 qualification.

The concern is not that demand has disappeared.

Rather, a later volume ramp could shift production and revenue between quarters at a time when investors expect AI growth to accelerate during the second half.

Vinh believes the financial impact should remain limited because Nvidia can compensate by shipping more B300 Blackwell systems.

He still expects Rubin shipments to begin ramping in July and forecasts deliveries of roughly 1.7 million to 1.8 million units during 2026.

KeyBanc retained an Overweight rating on Nvidia and raised its price target to $330 from $310.

Bank of America analyst Haas Liu said in a research note that supply-chain checks continued to indicate a strong AI demand pipeline.

He believes TSMC could raise its full-year revenue-growth outlook from the current forecast of more than 30%.

Capital expenditure will provide another important signal.

TSMC previously said its 2026 spending would reach the upper end of its $52 billion to $56 billion range.

Liu believes the company could lift that forecast to about $58 billion, reflecting tight equipment availability and capacity expansion across advanced logic, memory and packaging.

Nystedt, by contrast, expects management to retain the existing range.

A larger budget would signal confidence that demand from Nvidia, custom-chip designers and hyperscale cloud companies can remain strong.

Unchanged spending would not necessarily indicate weakness, although it could disappoint investors positioned for another upgrade.
2026-07-15 08:57 3mo ago
2026-07-15 04:52 3mo ago
IBM klesl, výrobci firewallů mohou těžit z přesunu výdajů
PANW Palo Alto Networks
FMP Stock News 72
Original source text
IBM stock suffered its worst one-day decline on record after the technology group admitted that customers were moving money away from its products and towards urgently needed data-centre infrastructure.

The stock plunged 25.2% to $217.07 on Tuesday, leaving it just above its 52-week low, after preliminary second-quarter revenue and profit missed Wall Street forecasts.

Yet Barclays analyst Saket Kalia sees a potential winner on the other side of that spending shift: network-security companies selling firewalls.

As per TipRanks, his industry checks identified Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Check Point as potential beneficiaries.

Palo Alto Networks is one of the world’s largest firewall providers and gives customers a broad portfolio spanning network, cloud and security operations products.

Its position makes it an obvious beneficiary when companies prioritise cybersecurity spending over less urgent software projects.

The stock climbed 6.8% to $352.89 on Tuesday as IBM’s warning drew attention to the resilience of security budgets.

Kalia’s analysis suggested that demand for firewall hardware was benefiting from the same urgency pushing companies to secure servers and memory before costs rise further.

The difficulty is valuation. TipRanks’ comparison tool showed no analyst-implied upside for Palo Alto at Tuesday’s closing level.

Its average 12-month target was $333.31, below the market price, despite a Strong Buy consensus.

Fortinet supplied Kalia with the strongest numerical evidence that customers are already buying more security hardware.

Its first-quarter product revenue jumped 41% from a year earlier to $645 million, while total revenue rose 20% to $1.9 billion.

Kalia pointed to that product strength as evidence that the shift was appearing in firewall sales rather than remaining a theoretical opportunity.

The company specialises in FortiGate firewalls and builds many of its own security processors, allowing it to offer high-performance appliances at competitive prices.

That could be particularly attractive when customers need greater network capacity to protect expanding AI infrastructure.

Fortinet shares gained 3.9% to a record $166.83 on Tuesday. But, like Palo Alto, the rally has overtaken the broader analyst consensus.

TipRanks listed an average target of about $117, while Barclays’ own latest target was $155 and TD Cowen recently raised its target to $215.

Check Point was the most modest gainer of the three, rising 2% to $137.02, but it offered the clearest valuation case.

The platform showed a Moderate Buy consensus and an average target of $148.36, implying almost 9% upside from the price used in its analysis.

The target was based on 12 Buy and 18 Hold ratings, with no Sell recommendations.

Check Point has traditionally been viewed as a slower-growing but profitable cybersecurity company.

That positioning could become more attractive if the current spending shift favours established firewall vendors without supporting the premium valuations attached to faster-growing rivals.

Still, Kalia included an important warning. The boost “could be temporary,” because companies may simply be bringing purchases forward to avoid supply constraints and higher prices.

Once that wave passes, the sector could experience a digestion period similar to the slowdown that followed pandemic-era technology spending.
2026-07-15 08:27 3mo ago
2026-07-15 03:46 3mo ago
GBP/JPY na maximu od roku 2008 kvůli rozdílu sazeb
GBPJPY GBP/JPY
FMP Forex News 86
Original source text
The GBP/JPY cross scales higher for the second straight day and climbs to a fresh weekly top, around the 217.70 region, during the first half of the European session on Wednesday. Moreover, spot prices remain within striking distance of the highest level since January 2008 and seem poised to appreciate further amid a supportive fundamental backdrop.

Despite looming intervention risks, the Japanese Yen (JPY) continues with its relative underperformance on the back of the wide gap in borrowing costs between Japan and other major economies, including the UK. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) raised the short-term policy rate in June to 1% or, the highest level since 1995, while the Bank of England's (BoE) base rate sits at 3.75%. This leaves an approximate gap of 275 basis points (bps), which keeps the so-called JPY carry trade active and continues to act as a tailwind for the GBP/JPY cross.

Meanwhile, Japan's economy is highly vulnerable to energy supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz as it relies on the Middle East for over 90% of crude oil imports. The closure of the critical waterway, along with a further escalation of tensions between the US and Iran, turns out to be another factor undermining the JPY. The British Pound (GBP), on the other hand, benefits from fading UK political uncertainty, hawkish BoE signals, and modest US Dollar (USD) weakness. This validates the positive outlook for the GBP/JPY cross and favors bulls.

Speaking before the Treasury Select Committee, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey warned on Tuesday of the potential effects of the resumption of the US-Iran conflict and that the event has demonstrated that inflation has not eased enough. Traders were quick to fully price in at least one 25 bps rate increase by year-end, and a possible first hike as early as September. This, in turn, suggests that the path of least resistance for the GBP/JPY cross is to the upside, and any corrective pullback is more likely to be seen as an opportunity for bullish traders.

Pound Sterling FAQs The Pound Sterling (GBP) is the oldest currency in the world (886 AD) and the official currency of the United Kingdom. It is the fourth most traded unit for foreign exchange (FX) in the world, accounting for 12% of all transactions, averaging $630 billion a day, according to 2022 data. Its key trading pairs are GBP/USD, also known as ‘Cable’, which accounts for 11% of FX, GBP/JPY, or the ‘Dragon’ as it is known by traders (3%), and EUR/GBP (2%). The Pound Sterling is issued by the Bank of England (BoE).

The single most important factor influencing the value of the Pound Sterling is monetary policy decided by the Bank of England. The BoE bases its decisions on whether it has achieved its primary goal of “price stability” – a steady inflation rate of around 2%. Its primary tool for achieving this is the adjustment of interest rates. When inflation is too high, the BoE will try to rein it in by raising interest rates, making it more expensive for people and businesses to access credit. This is generally positive for GBP, as higher interest rates make the UK a more attractive place for global investors to park their money. When inflation falls too low it is a sign economic growth is slowing. In this scenario, the BoE will consider lowering interest rates to cheapen credit so businesses will borrow more to invest in growth-generating projects.

Data releases gauge the health of the economy and can impact the value of the Pound Sterling. Indicators such as GDP, Manufacturing and Services PMIs, and employment can all influence the direction of the GBP. A strong economy is good for Sterling. Not only does it attract more foreign investment but it may encourage the BoE to put up interest rates, which will directly strengthen GBP. Otherwise, if economic data is weak, the Pound Sterling is likely to fall.

Another significant data release for the Pound Sterling is the Trade Balance. This indicator measures the difference between what a country earns from its exports and what it spends on imports over a given period. If a country produces highly sought-after exports, its currency will benefit purely from the extra demand created from foreign buyers seeking to purchase these goods. Therefore, a positive net Trade Balance strengthens a currency and vice versa for a negative balance.
2026-07-15 08:27 3mo ago
2026-07-15 04:22 3mo ago
Slabší inflace v USA tlačí dolar dolů
AUDUSD AUD/USD USDCAD USD/CAD
FMP Forex News 86
Original source text
Commodity-linked currencies strengthened after US inflation data came in weaker than expected. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) slowed to 3.5% year-on-year in June, below the 3.8% forecast, while core inflation eased to 2.6% versus expectations of 2.8%. On a monthly basis, headline CPI unexpectedly fell by 0.4%, while core CPI was unchanged. The moderation in inflationary pressure increased expectations that the Federal Reserve may adopt a more accommodative policy stance, putting pressure on the US dollar and supporting both the Australian and Canadian dollars against the greenback.

However, despite the weaker US dollar, the next move in USD/CAD will largely depend on the Bank of Canada’s policy decision. Later today, the central bank will announce its interest rate decision, publish its updated Monetary Policy Report, and hold a press conference with the Governor. If policymakers maintain a cautiously hawkish tone on inflation, the Canadian dollar could receive additional support. Conversely, a more dovish message may limit CAD gains despite the broader weakness in the US dollar.

Market participants will also focus on the release of the US Producer Price Index (PPI), which will provide further insight into inflation trends following the softer CPI report. In addition, US crude oil inventory data could influence USD/CAD, as oil prices traditionally have a significant impact on the Canadian dollar.

AUD/USD The AUD/USD pair continues to develop the bullish engulfing reversal pattern. Yesterday, buyers managed to test the key resistance level around 0.7000. If the pair secures a sustained break above this level, the rally could extend towards the 0.7080–0.7130 area. The bullish scenario would be invalidated by a move below 0.6900.

Key events for AUD/USD:

Today at 14:00 (GMT+3): US MBA Mortgage Market Index Today at 15:30 (GMT+3): US Producer Price Index (PPI) Today at 15:45 (GMT+3): Speech by FOMC member John Williams

USD/CAD Following confirmation of the bearish tower top reversal pattern, selling pressure on USD/CAD intensified, reinforced by the weaker-than-expected US inflation data. As a result, the pair declined below 1.4100. Technical analysis suggests there is scope for a further move lower towards the 1.3960–1.4020 area. A decisive break back above 1.4120 could revive the bullish outlook.

Key events for USD/CAD:

Today at 16:45 (GMT+3): Bank of Canada interest rate decision Today at 17:30 (GMT+3): US Crude Oil Inventories Today at 17:30 (GMT+3): Bank of Canada press conference

Overall, the weaker US inflation report strengthened expectations of a more accommodative Federal Reserve, weighing on the US dollar and supporting commodity-linked currencies. However, the next moves in AUD/USD and USD/CAD will depend on upcoming economic data and the Bank of Canada’s policy guidance.

Trade over 50 forex markets 24 hours a day with FXOpen. Take advantage of low commissions, deep liquidity, and spreads from 0.0 pips (additional fees may apply). Open your FXOpen account now or learn more about trading forex with FXOpen.

This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.

FXOpenhttps://www.fxopen.com/

FXOpen is a global Forex and CFD Broker, founded in 2005 by a group of traders. With over 16 years of experience, the company has gained an excellent reputation a major brokerage that continues to expand rapidly. The broker offers a choice of platforms, including the popular MT4 and MT5 platforms, with a wide range of trading instruments with spreads from 0.0 pips: 600+ FX, index, share, commodity and cryptocurrency CFDs. FXOpen also provides its own PAMM technology, allowing clients to benefit from the strategies of experienced traders with a proven track record of successful trading and guarantees automatic distribution of profit and loss between the strategy provider and the strategy followers. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing your money. PAMM is only available in certain jurisdictions. Cryptocurrency CFDs are not available to Retail clients at FXOpen UK.
2026-07-15 07:52 3mo ago
2026-07-15 03:41 3mo ago
Americké ministerstvo financí zmrazilo Tron peněženky s USDT za 131 milionů
CET CoinEx USDT Tether
CoinGecko News 92
Original source text
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the US government ordered the freezing of more than $130 million in cryptocurrency held in wallets associated with Iran, in response to escalating tensions in the Middle East.

Wallet freeze targets Iran’s Central BankBlockchain investigator Specter earlier identified onchain data showing that stablecoin issuer Tether froze four Tron blockchain wallets containing a total of $131 million worth of USDt (USDT). Bessent confirmed that these wallets were linked to the Central Bank of Iran.

Mini dictionary: Tron, a blockchain platform focused on high-throughput and scalable decentralized applications, supports USDT (Tether) token issuance and transactions. Tether is a popular stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, widely used in cryptocurrency trading and payments.

Bessent emphasized the Treasury Department’s efforts to counteract Iran’s financial activities using digital assets. He stated, “US Treasury is committed to disrupting and degrading Iran’s illicit financial activities, including its abuse of digital assets.” He added that authorities will continue tracing and blocking funds to prevent the Iranian government from accessing income generated via illicit operations.

“We will continue to aggressively follow the money and deny the Iranian regime access to the proceeds of its illicit revenue schemes.”

Ongoing pressure campaign against IranThe asset freeze coincided with the breakdown of a ceasefire between the US and Iran. Washington renewed its blockade of Iranian ports, while the US Central Command reported a new wave of military strikes on targets in Iran. On the same day, Iranian defense sources claimed to have conducted drone operations against American military facilities at Jordan’s Al Azraq Air Base.

This is not the first time the US government has coordinated with Tether on such actions. In April, Tether stated it froze over $344 million in USDT at the request of US authorities, as part of broader measures targeting Iran’s access to international financial systems.

MonthFrozen Amount (USDT)Initiated byApril$344 millionTether, US authoritiesJune$131 millionTether, US TreasuryOperation Economic Fury expands seizuresBessent earlier reported in May that the US had seized around $1 billion in Iranian crypto assets since the introduction of Operation Economic Fury, a financial pressure campaign begun in March 2025.

He described the ongoing initiative as a comprehensive effort targeting procurement networks supplying the Iranian military. “Through Economic Fury, the Treasury Department is disrupting the foreign procurement networks that support the Iranian military’s efforts to acquire weapons,” Bessent stated in June.

Treasury has frozen the Iranian regime’s assets, severely disrupted its economy, and dismantled the Iranian war machine. Treasury will not tolerate any support of the Iranian military.

TRM, an analytics firm specializing in blockchain forensics, reported that entities linked to Iran moved $3.8 billion in crypto through CoinEx, a global cryptocurrency exchange, as part of operations scrutinized under the ongoing sanctions framework.

Mini dictionary: TRM Labs is a blockchain intelligence company that analyzes cryptocurrency transactions to detect financial crime, money laundering, and sanction violations.

US authorities have repeatedly signaled that digital assets will remain a focus in efforts to clamp down on Iranian financial networks, with further actions possible as hostilities continue.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
2026-07-15 06:52 3mo ago
2026-07-15 02:30 3mo ago
GBP/USD roste po slabší americké inflaci
GBPUSD GBP/USD
FMP Forex News 86
Original source text
The Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate rallied on Tuesday after softer-than-expected US inflation data prompted investors to scale back expectations for another Federal Reserve interest rate hike.

At the time of writing, GBP/USD was trading around $1.3411, up approximately 0.5% on the day.

Latest — Exchange Rates:
Pound to Dollar (GBP/USD): 1.338178 (+0.24%)
Euro to Dollar (EUR/USD): 1.142849 (+0.40%)
Dollar to Yen (USD/JPY): 162.13999 (-0.17%)

DAILY RECAP:

A clear US Dollar (USD) selling bias emerged on Tuesday after the latest US consumer price index showed inflationary pressures eased by more than expected last month.

June's Consumer Price Index reported that headline inflation slowed from 4.2% to 3.5% year-on-year, comfortably below forecasts for a more modest easing to 3.8%. Core inflation also undershot expectations, with annual core CPI easing to 2.6%.

In response, financial markets trimmed some of their more hawkish policy expectations for the Federal Reserve, with the odds for a September interest rate hike falling from around 70% to 50%.

Meanwhile, the Pound (GBP) found support during Tuesday's session as investors doubled down on bets that the Bank of England (BoE) will have to raise borrowing costs again.

The hawkish shift in market sentiment stems from a fresh spike in global energy markets. With conflict flaring up once more in the Gulf, the vital Strait of Hormuz shipping lane has been blocked, raising fears of a renewed inflation shock that could force the BoE’s hand before 2026 draws to a close.

Even so, Sterling's rally was tempered by cautious commentary from the head of the BoE.

Appearing before the Treasury Select Committee, BoE Governor Andrew Bailey struck a sober tone. He pointed out that the geopolitical unrest in the Middle East poses a serious threat to financial stability, while simultaneously reminding lawmakers that Britain's sluggish economic growth remains a heavy drag on the domestic outlook.

Near-Term GBP/USD Forecast: US Producer Prices in Focus Looking ahead, the next catalyst of movement for the Pound to US Dollar (GBP/USD) exchange rate will be the publication of the latest US producer price index on Wednesday.

A cooling in factory gate prices could weigh on the ‘Greenback’ in midweek trade, as we could see a further trimming of Fed rate-hike bets if there are further signs that US inflationary pressures are easing.

Meanwhile, movement in the Pound looks set to remain limited on Wednesday amid a lull in UK data ahead of Thursday’s GDP release.
2026-07-15 06:52 3mo ago
2026-07-15 00:05 3mo ago
SpaceX žádá o 100 000 satelitů Starlink Gen3
SPCX SpaceX
FMP Stock News 72
Original source text
Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX 2.20%) has had a volatile first month as a publicly traded company. Its share price rose to as much as $225, but as of writing, it has sunk back near its $135 IPO price, currently trading just $1 above it. Opinions on SpaceX's prospects are divided. The bulls will argue that, given its large addressable market and leadership in core markets, including space travel and satellite-based internet services, the stock could produce outstanding returns over the long run.

The bears will point out that SpaceX remains unprofitable, and its financial results and outlook hardly justify a $1.8 trillion valuation. Time will tell who is right, but recent news from the company was a bit of a win for the bulls. Let's look into these recent developments and what they could mean for the stock.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Starlink could become a bigger growth engine First, let's briefly review SpaceX's Starlink, which is currently its most profitable business. It offers high-speed internet through a network of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, with speeds ranging from 100 Mbps (megabits per second) to over 400 Mbps. This isn't the fastest speed, not by a long shot. Fiber internet is much faster, with some legacy providers offering speeds well above 1000 Mbps.

Some customers still opt for Starlink right now because they live in rural and other traditionally underserved areas. However, SpaceX wants Starlink to be more mainstream. The company recently filed a request with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to deploy up to 100,000 of its new Gen3 Starlink satellites.

There are several things to note about this proposal. Let's focus on two. First, Starlink currently has a bit over 10,400 satellites in orbit -- so 100,000 would be a substantial increase. With far more satellites in space, Starlink's internet speeds could improve dramatically. Second, SpaceX wants to launch this constellation in very low Earth orbit, rather than the LEO satellites it currently operates.

This is another factor that would boost speed. SpaceX isn't shy about its ambitions here. The company is looking to build a network of satellites that could handle the majority of the world's internet traffic.

Today's Change

(

-2.20

%) $

-3.06

Current Price

$

136.08

SpaceX has some things to address first This is an ambitious proposal, but there are several problems. One is that, given how quickly SpaceX currently builds Starlink satellites, it will take a long time to manufacture 100,000 of them, let alone launch them into space. The company produced an average of 70 satellites per week at its Redmond, Washington facility between December 2025 and April 2026.

That's just 3,640 annually. At that pace, it will take over 27 years to make 100,000 of them. SpaceX will have to significantly expand its manufacturing capacity to reach its ambitious goals. Also, while SpaceX uses its partially reusable Falcon 9 rockets to launch its V2 Starlink satellites into space as of now -- with the rocket capable of carrying up to 29 per trip -- the Gen3 Starlink satellites are much bigger. That's another reason why SpaceX developed Starship, a next-gen, fully reusable rocket with a much bigger payload capacity.

Starship is still in the flight-test phase, but it is clearly central to SpaceX's future, including its space travel ambitions and its ability to substantially expand Starlink's reach.

Is the stock a buy? Improving and expanding its Starlink business could make SpaceX a much more profitable company in the long run, but it still needs regulatory approval for its constellation of 100,000 satellites. And then it will have to figure out the logistics of getting them into space in a reasonable time frame. These aren't insurmountable issues, but the company could encounter setbacks, launch delays, or other potential headwinds with its plans. Investors need to factor all that in.

Further, several other companies are working hard to compete with SpaceX's Starlink (and other business segments, for that matter). SpaceX might be the runaway leader right now -- no company has nearly as many satellites in orbit -- but that could change in the long run. So, although the bulls are right that SpaceX's opportunities are massive, there is plenty of risk as well, and my view is that the stock is a buy, but at a much lower price. That's why I'd wait for a steeper pullback before initiating a position.
2026-07-15 06:46 3mo ago
2026-07-15 01:01 3mo ago
Intel začíná vyrábět Core Ultra 3 s High NA EUV
INTC Intel
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
High NA EUV reaches new readiness milestone with first high-volume Logic product

Intel Foundry has entered high-volume manufacturing for a subset of Intel® Core™ Ultra Series 3 processors, code-named Panther Lake, using ASML’s EXE High NA EUV technology Specific Intel 18A layers are now dual-qualified on High NA EUV in Oregon, with product shipping to customers at yields matched to the NXE platformIntel and ASML continue to closely collaborate on High NA EUV readiness with flexibility to incorporate into future nodes based on customer needs VELDHOVEN, the Netherlands, July 15, 2026 – ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) today reported that Intel Foundry is using ASML’s High NA EUV technology on the Intel 18A process node to produce a subset of its Intel® Core™ Ultra Series 3 processors. This milestone marks an important step in demonstrating High NA EUV readiness in a production environment.

ASML and Intel have worked closely for decades to advance lithography technology and support the continued scaling of semiconductors. The high numerical aperture extreme ultraviolet (High NA EUV) lithography process is an important next step in EUV lithography, developed by ASML to enable more precise patterning for advanced chip manufacturing.

The Intel® Core™ Ultra Series 3 processors, code-named Panther Lake, are built on Intel 18A. The use of High NA EUV to pattern specific layers of these products provides ASML and Intel Foundry with helpful data to further refine system setup, up time and manufacturing implementation. This paves the way towards broader adoption, utilizing the full capabilities of the technology.

“With increased resolution and better process control, the introduction of High NA EUV marks a substantial development in semiconductor lithography,” said Christophe Fouquet, ASML President and CEO. “We are proud to play a role in enabling the smaller, denser patterning that will accelerate advancements in AI and other emerging technologies.”

“This milestone reflects the close technical collaboration between Intel and ASML and shows how High NA EUV can be integrated into advanced semiconductor manufacturing at scale,” said Naga Chandrasekaran, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Intel Foundry. “By qualifying the High NA EUV process option on select Intel 18A product layers, our existing fleet of tools are providing customers with increased output, while we develop future options to achieve leading-edge performance, density and manufacturing flexibility on upcoming nodes.”

In 2024, Intel and ASML completed integration of the industry’s first commercial High NA EUV lithography system at the company’s Hillsboro, Oregon, R&D site. Intel Foundry was also the first company to install and pass acceptance testing of the second generation, TWINSCAN EXE:5200B, which builds on the TWINSCAN EXE:5000 and increases output and overlay accuracy, along with an improved light source. With this announcement, Intel Foundry is first in the industry to ship high-volume logic product using High NA EUV.

Media Relations contactsInvestor Relations contactsMonique Mols +31 6 5284 4418Jim Kavanagh +31 40 268 3938 Sarah de Crescenzo +1 925 899 8985Pete Convertito +1 203 919 1714 Karen Lo +886 9 397 88635Peter Cheang +886 3 659 6771 About ASML
ASML is a leading supplier to the semiconductor industry. The company provides chipmakers with hardware, software and services to mass produce the patterns of integrated circuits (microchips). Together with its partners, ASML drives the advancement of more affordable, more powerful, more energy-efficient microchips. ASML enables groundbreaking technology to solve some of humanity's toughest challenges, such as in healthcare, energy use and conservation, mobility and agriculture. ASML is a multinational company headquartered in Veldhoven, the Netherlands, with offices across EMEA, the US and Asia. Every day, ASML’s more than 44,500 employees (FTE) challenge the status quo and push technology to new limits. ASML is traded on Euronext Amsterdam and NASDAQ under the symbol ASML. Discover ASML – our products, technology and career opportunities – at www.asml.com.

Link to press release
2026-07-15 06:46 3mo ago
2026-07-15 01:11 3mo ago
Intel používá nový stroj ASML pro Panther Lake
INTC Intel
FMP Stock News 86
Original source text
Computer motherboard and Intel chip appear in this illustration taken August 25, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SAN FRANCISCO, July 14 (Reuters) - Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab has decided to use a high-end machine from ASML to manufacture some of ​its flagship Panther Lake laptop chips, ASML said on ‌Tuesday, a move that will help the chipmaker learn to use the tool more effectively.

Following experiments that began in 2024, Intel has begun to ​use ASML's next-generation high numerical aperture (High NA) extreme ultraviolet (EUV) ​machines, which print circuit patterns on to microchips, to ⁠help produce a portion of its Panther Lake processors, ASML ​said.

The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here.

The industry has debated at what point it makes economic sense ​to begin deploying the High NA tools, which likely will be needed by chipmakers in the future as they continue to shrink the atomic-sized features ​that make up chips.

The High NA equipment costs around $400 million, ​or twice as much as the standard EUV machine. The tool is ‌also ⁠technically challenging to introduce into production processes.

Intel is using the High NA tool for specific layers of the chip, which will help Intel and ASML collect data and optimize the equipment.

Intel declined ​to comment on ​the announcement.

The ⁠company uses its 18A manufacturing process to fabricate the Panther Lake chips and already uses ASML's ​standard EUV lithography machines to do so. Lithography ​is the ⁠process of using light to draw the complex patterns that make up the circuits on a chip.

Intel received the first High NA ⁠tool ​in 2024 at its Hillsboro, Oregon ​research and development site where the company develops its new manufacturing techniques and technologies.

Reporting ​by Max A. Cherney in San Francisco; Editing by Sonali Paul

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Max A. Cherney is a correspondent for Reuters based in San Francisco, where he reports on the semiconductor industry and artificial intelligence. He joined Reuters in 2023 and has previously worked for Barron’s magazine and its sister publication, MarketWatch. Cherney graduated from Trent University with a degree in history.
2026-07-15 05:49 3mo ago
2026-07-15 01:13 3mo ago
Xiaomi ztrácí podíl na trhu, Samsung a Apple sílí
XIACF Xiaomi
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Xiaomi stock retreated for two consecutive days after a report confirmed that the company was losing market share in the smartphone industry. It slipped to H$25.82 in Hong Kong, a few points below this month’s high of H$26.70. 

A report released by Omdia showed that Xiaomi’s woes mounted in the second quarter, a situation that may lead to weaker revenue and profitability growth. 

Xiaomi’s market share dropped to 11%, making it the third-biggest player in the industry after Samsung and Apple. Its share has been in a slow downward trend after peaking at about 15% in the second quarter of last year.

In contrast, Samsung became the biggest smartphone maker in the world with a share of 22%, while Apple has 20%. The report noted that the delayed launch of Samsung S26-series pushed some demand into the second quarter. Samsung also gained ground in the budget segment.

Apple’s sales were boosted by iPhone 17, which delivered the strongest iPhone refresh and upgrade cycle in the company’s history.

Xiaomi’s market share retreat happened as vendors in the sub-$400 mass market shifted strategy. Instead of prioritizing volumes, they are now focusing on adjusting retail prices and in their premium segments. Rujan Bjorvovde, the Principal Analyst at Omdia, said:

“Managing the surging component costs is incredibly complex and unpredictable, with some vendors facing memory costing more than four to five times what they did a year ago.”

Xiaomi’s business is struggling as the memory crisis intensifies, with memory and storage costs accounting for about 60% of the bill of materials for budget devices. Sadly, there is still no end in sight for this memory crisis, with Apple warning that it will hike prices for its next models.

The most recent earnings report showed that the company’s revenue and profits nosedived in the first quarter. Its revenue dropped to RMB 99.14 billion from RMB 111.29 billion in the same period last year. Smartphone revenue slipped by 10% to RMB79.3 billion.

On the positive side, the smartphone revenue decline was offset by a modest increase in its smart EV, AI, and New Initiatives segment. This segment’s revenue rose by 6.9% to RMB 19.9 billion, helped by more vehicle sales and offset by lower prices. It delivered 80,856 vehicles in Q1, up from 75,869 in the previous quarter.

Its profitability remained under pressure, with the profit for the period dropping to RMB 4.7 billion from the previous RMB 10.89 billion. These dynamics likely continued in the second quarter as its smartphone sales dropped.

Xiaomi stock chart | Source: TradingView

The weekly chart shows that the Xiaomi stock has been under pressure in the past few months as challenges in its business continued. It plunged from H$61.45 in June last year to the current H$25.82. 

The stock has slumped below the 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement level, where most rebounds normally happen. It has remained below the 50 and 200 moving averages.

Therefore, the most likely forecast is bearish as traders wait for its next earnings report, which is expected in August. If this happens, there is a risk that it will drop and retest the support of H$21.35. 
2026-07-15 04:23 3mo ago
2026-07-14 23:25 3mo ago
Stripe a Advent nabízejí koupit PayPal za 53 miliard USD
PYPL PayPal
FMP Stock News 92
Original source text
A smartphone with the Stripe logo is placed on a laptop in this illustration taken on July 14, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

July 14 - Payments company Stripe and private equity firm Advent International have made a joint offer to acquire ​PayPal Holdings Inc (PYPL.O), opens new tab for $60.50 per share, in a deal that would value the ‌payments company at more than $53 billion, two people familiar with the matter said.

The offer, submitted earlier this month, is backed by about $50 billion in committed financing from banks, the people said, and ​represents around a 28% premium to PayPal's closing share price on Tuesday.

Get a look at the day ahead in U.S. and global markets with the Morning Bid U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.

The people ​declined to be named as the deal discussions are confidential. Advent ⁠declined to comment, while PayPal and Stripe did not immediately respond to Reuters requests ​for comment.

The proposal follows an initial approach made in early April, the sources said. Stripe ​and Advent have not received a response from PayPal and are seeking to advance discussions in the coming weeks, the sources added.

Under the proposal, Stripe and Advent would jointly own PayPal, with each ​holding an equal stake, rather than breaking up the company, the people said. There ​is no certainty the approach will result in a transaction, they added.

Founded in the late 1990s, ‌PayPal was ⁠an early player in digital payments, but has faced increasing competition as consumers have embraced alternative payment methods and rivals such as Apple Pay and Google Pay have gained market share.

It has spent the past several years grappling with slowing growth and ​intensifying competition in digital ​payments, wiping out ⁠much of the value it gained during the pandemic.

The company's market capitalization peaked at about $360 billion in 2021 and fell to ​as low as roughly $36 billion this year. It has lost more ​than 40% ⁠of its market value over the past 12 months.

After taking over in March, PayPal CEO Enrique Lores started a sweeping turnaround exercise to simplify the payments provider and sharpen its focus ⁠on ​growth.

In April, the company split its operations into three ​units covering checkout, consumer financial services Venmo, and payments and crypto, while making a series of management changes.

Reporting ​by Milana Vinn in New York; Editing by Echo Wang, Sumeet Chatterjee and Lincoln Feast

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Milana Vinn reports on technology, media, and telecom (TMT) mergers and acquisitions. Her content usually appears in the markets and deals sections of the website. Milana previously worked at GLG and PE Hub, where she spent several years covering TMT deals in private equity. She graduated from CUNY Graduate School of Journalism with Masters in Business Journalism.
2026-07-15 04:12 3mo ago
2026-07-15 00:04 3mo ago
USD/CAD padá k měsíčnímu minimu před BoC
OIL Ropa (Brent) USDCAD USD/CAD
FMP Forex News 88
Original source text
By the time the Bank of Canada announces its policy decision today, the Canadian Dollar has already built a powerful foundation for further gains. USD/CAD has fallen to its lowest level in nearly a month, supported not by a single catalyst but by three reinforcing forces: a broad retreat in the US Dollar after softer inflation data, higher oil prices that strengthen Canada’s export outlook, and growing expectations that the Bank of Canada may sound more hawkish than markets anticipated only a week ago.

The first two drivers have already reshaped the currency outlook. June’s weaker-than-expected US CPI prompted investors to scale back Federal Reserve tightening expectations, weighing on the Dollar across major currency pairs. At the same time, Brent crude has surged above $86 as renewed US-Iran hostilities threaten energy supplies through the Strait of Hormuz. For Canada, rising oil prices are more than just a global inflation story—they improve the country’s terms of trade and typically provide direct support for the Canadian Dollar, helping explain why the Loonie has outperformed most of its peers following the inflation data.

The Bank of Canada now has an opportunity either to reinforce or challenge that momentum. Economists overwhelmingly expect a sixth consecutive hold at 2.25%, making the decision itself unlikely to surprise. The more important question is whether Governor Tiff Macklem adjusts his message in response to oil’s renewed surge. His previous characterization of policy as balancing weaker growth against energy-driven inflation was formed before Brent’s latest rally, meaning the Monetary Policy Report may already understate current inflation risks. Markets will therefore pay closer attention to Macklem’s live assessment than to the published projections.

That leaves the accompanying statement and Macklem’s press conference as the key market events. Investors will focus on whether the Governor continues to describe policy as a balanced dilemma or acknowledges that the renewed energy shock has tilted inflation risks higher. Any discussion of the ongoing CUSMA trade review will also be closely watched, as it remains an important downside risk to Canada’s growth outlook. Even without signaling an imminent rate increase, a modestly more hawkish tone could encourage markets to further increase expectations of tightening in early 2027, where pricing is already becoming increasingly balanced.

Technically, USD/CAD is approaching an important inflection point. While the decline from 1.4247 has accelerated, it is still viewed as a correction within the broader uptrend from 1.3480. Strong support is expected between former resistance at 1.3965 and 38.2% retracement of 1.3480 to 1.4247 at 1.3954. Break of 1.4159 minor resistance will indicae that the correction has completed.

However, a decisive break below 1.3954/65 would suggest the advance from 1.3480 has completed as a three-wave corrective rebound after failing near 61.8% retracement of 1.4791 to 1.3480 at 1.4290. Such a development would shift the near-term technical outlook decisively in favour of further Canadian Dollar strength.

ActionForex

ActionForex.com was set up back in 2004 with the aim to provide insightful analysis to forex traders, serving the trading community for two decades. We started providing only a daily and a mid-day report, now known as Action Insights. Gradually, we added a lot more in-house contents to the site. Technical Outlook section was expanded to cover more pairs. In addition to that, Top Movers, Heat Map, Pivot Point Charts and Pivot Meters, Action Bias and Volatility Charts, are tools used by traders from all over the world.
2026-07-15 03:33 3mo ago
2026-07-14 21:33 3mo ago
CVLT čelí rozšířené žalobě po propadu akcií
CVLT CommVault Systems
FMP Stock News 72
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Hagens Berman (HBSS), a national shareholder rights firm, alerts investors in Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT) that a newly filed securities class action lawsuit has expanded the alleged class period. The lawsuit now covers investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Commvault securities between January 28, 2025, and January 26, 2026, inclusive.

Hagens Berman is investigating the claims pled in the pending litigation and encourages Commvault investors who suffered substantial losses to submit your losses now.

Expanded Alleged Class Period: Jan. 28, 2025 – Jan. 26, 2026
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: July 17, 2026
Visit: www.hbsslaw.com/investor-fraud/cvlt
Contact the Firm Now: [email protected]
                                        844-916-0895

View our latest video summary of the allegations: www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUMo4d2ZLkI

Expanded Scope of Allegations

The new suit, City of Fort Lauderdale Police and Firefighters' Retirement System v. Commvault Systems, Inc., et al., extends the start of the alleged fraud period from April 29, 2025, back to January 28, 2025. This expansion captures a broader range of investor activity and expands the claims brought against the company and its senior executives regarding their business disclosures.

Focus of CVLT Securities Class Action Litigation:

The litigation alleges that Defendants misrepresented and failed to disclose that:

Commvault's competitive positioning was materially weaker than Defendants had represented to investors; Due to the undisclosed increase in competition, Commvault was forced to make significant concessions on price and contract duration for its software licenses; As these concessions became unsustainable, SaaS became a larger portion of the Company's sales mix; The increasing mix of SaaS sales, which carry shorter term durations and lower ASPs, negatively impacted the Company's margin and NNARR; and As a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. The truth allegedly emerged before markets opened on January 27, 2026, when Commvault announced its third-quarter fiscal year 20261 financial results. Commvault disclosed NNARR in constant currency of $39 million, missing analysts' expectations of approximately $45 million. Chief Accounting Officer Danielle Abrahamsen ("CAO Abrahamsen") revealed that the mix of SaaS deals increased to "70%" during the quarter and highlighted that "landing these customers at a 2 to 3x smaller ASP than software . . . does have a significant impact on ARR."

On this news, the price of Commvault common stock fell $40.23 per share, or about 31%, to close at a price of $89.13 per share on January 27, 2026.

HBSS Investigation

"We continue to investigate whether Commvault misled investors about its operational performance and financial reporting during the alleged expanded class period, as the new complaint contends" said Reed Kathrein, the Hagens Berman partner leading the firm's investigation of the pending claims.

If you invested in Commvault and have substantial losses, or have knowledge that will assist the firm's investigation, submit your losses now.

If you'd like more information and answers to frequently asked questions about the Commvault case and the firm's investigation, read more »

Whistleblowers: Persons with non-public information regarding Commvault should consider their options to help in the investigation or take advantage of the SEC Whistleblower program. Under the new program, whistleblowers who provide original information may receive rewards totaling up to 30 percent of any successful recovery made by the SEC. For more information, call Reed Kathrein at 844-916-0895 or email [email protected].

About Hagens Berman
Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation firm focusing on corporate accountability. The firm is home to a robust practice and represents investors as well as whistleblowers, workers, consumers and others in cases achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and other wrongdoings. Hagens Berman's team has secured more than $2.9 billion in this area of law. More about the firm and its successes can be found at hbsslaw.com. Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw. 

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in any future case.

SOURCE Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
2026-07-15 02:52 3mo ago
2026-07-14 19:04 3mo ago
Outcome.xyz tlačí na trhy bez povolení na Hyperliquid
HYPE Hyperliquid
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Prediction markets are crypto’s quiet killer app. Polymarket proved that during the 2024 US election cycle. Now Hyperliquid wants a piece of the action, and Outcome.xyz is the team trying to blow the doors open.

The push is simple: let anyone deploy a prediction market on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure without needing permission from validators or anyone else. It hasn’t happened yet. And the community is making noise about it.

What HIP-4 built, and what it’s missing Hyperliquid launched its HIP-4 outcome markets on mainnet back on May 2. These are binary contracts that settle to either 0 or 1, essentially yes-or-no bets baked directly into Hyperliquid’s core trading engine, HyperCore. Shared order books, shared margining, shared data feeds.

Outcome.xyz was the team that deployed the first wave of these markets. They started with recurring daily BTC price binaries, the kind of straightforward contract that lets you stress-test plumbing without getting too creative. Early trading volumes hit several million dollars in notional value on the first days alone.

But here’s the thing: every single market that exists right now had to go through Hyperliquid’s validators. There’s no self-serve option. As of mid-July, permissionless deployment still hasn’t gone live.

Advertisement

Why permissionless matters Hyperliquid’s current model relies on validators to both approve and settle markets. Instead of trusting some external oracle service to report outcomes, Hyperliquid’s own validator set handles settlement. It reduces a major attack surface that has plagued prediction markets for years.

But validator gating for market creation means the menu of available markets is limited to whatever gets approved through that process. Community feedback on July 14 made the frustration clear, with calls for permissionless rollout “asap.”

Outcome.xyz appears to be the team most actively pushing this forward. As the primary frontend developer for HIP-4 markets, they have both the technical proximity and the incentive to see the gates come down.

The competitive chess match Hyperliquid isn’t entering an empty room. Polymarket remains the dominant on-chain prediction platform, and Kalshi has carved out a regulated niche in the US market. Both have significant head starts in liquidity, user base, and market variety.

What Hyperliquid brings to the table is integration. Hyperliquid’s pitch is that prediction markets live inside the same trading engine as perpetuals, spot markets, and everything else on the platform. A trader doesn’t need to move capital to a separate protocol to place a prediction bet. If you’re already running a strategy on Hyperliquid’s perpetuals, you can allocate margin to prediction markets without fragmenting your capital across platforms.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup represents exactly the kind of global event that drives massive prediction market volume, and a permissionless rollout before or during the event could serve as a significant catalyst for adoption.

Volumes on HIP-4 markets remain modest compared to dedicated prediction platforms. Several million dollars on launch days is encouraging infrastructure validation, not market dominance.

What investors should watch The permissionless deployment timeline is the single most important variable here. Until third-party builders can create markets freely, HIP-4 remains a proof of concept rather than a competitive product.

The validator-as-oracle settlement model eliminates oracle risk, which is a real problem that has caused costly misresolutions on other platforms. But it also means every market outcome depends on validator consensus, and as market variety expands into subjective or ambiguous territory, that consensus mechanism will be tested in ways that simple BTC price binaries never will.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:52 3mo ago
2026-07-14 20:44 3mo ago
Hyperliquid jednal se SEC o regulaci perpetual trhů
HYPE Hyperliquid
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Altcoins

14 July 2026 | 23:44 Representatives connected to the Hyperliquid ecosystem met with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force on July 14, 2026, bringing the architecture of decentralized perpetual markets into the agency’s regulatory discussions.

Key Takeaways SEC task force met Hyperliquid ecosystem representatives. Talks focused on decentralized perpetual market regulation. HIP-3 separates market deployment from core execution. Meeting confirms engagement, not regulatory approval. U.S. access still requires concrete regulatory action. According to the SEC’s official meeting memorandum, the participants represented the Hyperliquid Policy Center, XYZ Ltd. and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. The stated topic was how regulators could address issues involving crypto assets.

What the SEC Filing Actually Confirms The attached meeting request sought to brief the task force on the Hyperliquid protocol’s technology, markets and relevant ecosystem participants. It described Hyperliquid Labs as a software contributor and XYZ as a research and product laboratory operating a HIP-3 deployment for traditional-asset perpetual markets.

The proposed attendee list included Hyperliquid Policy Center CEO Jake Chervinsky, policy counsel Bradley Bourque, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan, XYZ representative Collins Belton and four lawyers from Sullivan & Cromwell.

The disclosure is more limited than a formal policy proposal. It does not publish a detailed technical presentation, identify specific exemptions requested from the SEC or record any commitments made by the agency. The meeting therefore confirms regulatory engagement, not approval of Hyperliquid, HIP-3 products or access for U.S. traders.

HIP-3 Separates Market Design From Trade Execution The policy question is complicated by how responsibilities are distributed under Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3.

HIP-3 allows independent builders to deploy perpetual markets without relying on a centralized listing committee. Each deployer is responsible for several functions that would normally sit with a derivatives venue:

Market definition: selecting the reference asset, contract specifications and oracle methodology. Risk controls: setting leverage limits and determining whether an asset is eligible for cross-margin treatment. Market operation: publishing oracle prices and settling or halting the contract when necessary. A mainnet deployer must maintain a stake of 500,000 HYPE. Validators can slash that stake through a weighted vote when irregular deployer inputs harm protocol correctness, uptime or performance. Slashed tokens are burned rather than distributed as compensation to affected traders.

Trade execution remains inside HyperCore, Hyperliquid’s native trading system. It provides the order books and margining infrastructure, although every HIP-3 exchange retains independent settings and its own market configuration. Cross-margining is not automatic: enabling it is irreversible and requires sufficient external liquidity, a dependable oracle and resistance to price manipulation.

XYZ illustrates that division of responsibilities. Its technical documentation states that HyperCore manages matching, order types, funding, liquidations and auto-deleveraging. XYZ supplies the bespoke oracle, mark price and external price used for its markets through distributed relayers that submit updates approximately every three seconds.

These contracts provide synthetic exposure rather than ownership of the referenced asset. An equity perpetual settled in USDC does not deliver the underlying share, making it legally and economically different from a tokenized security representing ownership rights. The distinction leaves regulators with separate questions around the derivative itself, the trading infrastructure, the oracle operator and any interface providing access.

The regulatory discussion is unfolding as Hyperliquid becomes more important to the economics of stablecoin distribution. JPMorgan recently lowered its earnings estimates for Circle and Coinbase, arguing that their revised USDC arrangement with Hyperliquid could pressure margins as both companies seek to preserve the stablecoin’s dominant position on the platform. The frequently cited $160 million figure represents estimated reserve yield that could be redirected under the arrangement, rather than a confirmed net loss.

The SEC Agenda Offers a Framework, Not a HIP-3 License The meeting took place one week after SEC Chair Paul Atkins published a statement on the agency’s 2026 Regulatory Agenda. Atkins said the Commission intends to establish clearer rules for crypto fundraising, custody and the trading of tokenized securities onchain.

Three pending workstreams are relevant to the broader Hyperliquid discussion: The SEC is considering exemptions and safe harbors for crypto-asset offerings. Proposed amendments could apply broker-dealer net-capital, customer-protection and recordkeeping rules to crypto-asset activities under Rules 15c3-1 and 15c3-3. A separate project would adapt Exchange Act rules for crypto trading on alternative trading systems and national securities exchanges. None of those entries expressly creates a pathway for permissionless perpetual markets. The SEC’s agenda primarily concerns securities offerings, broker-dealers and securities-trading venues, while the operation of derivatives markets also raises Commodity Exchange Act questions overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Hyperliquid’s policy effort is consequently proceeding on both tracks. In a July 9 submission to the CFTC, the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Phantom asked the derivatives regulator to distinguish software development from regulated financial intermediation.

Their proposed model would keep registration and compliance obligations with entities that handle customer orders, control funds or enter transactions, rather than automatically imposing them on developers publishing protocol code. The submission also called for regulated exchanges, clearing organizations and futures commission merchants to be allowed to use public blockchain infrastructure, subject to their existing market-surveillance, segregation and customer-protection duties.

U.S. Access Still Depends on Concrete Regulatory Action The SEC meeting creates a channel for explaining how Hyperliquid divides functions among validators, deployers, interfaces and users. It does not resolve which participants would need registration when a HIP-3 market references equities, indices or other traditional assets.

The current TradeXYZ disclaimer states that its interface is unavailable to U.S. persons. Changing that position would require more than a policy discussion: regulators would need to define the accountable entity for listing, market surveillance, oracle governance, margining, customer access and settlement.

Evidence of substantive progress would include a proposed SEC or CFTC rule covering onchain market infrastructure, formal guidance separating protocol development from market operation, registration by a venue using HyperCore or published exemptive relief addressing non-custodial access. Until one of those steps occurs, the July 14 session should be treated as regulatory engagement rather than authorization.

The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice.

Author

Kosta has reported on cryptocurrency markets and blockchain infrastructure since 2020, bringing over six years of hands-on experience in the crypto industry built through daily tracking of markets, trends, and emerging blockchain developments. Specializing in Bitcoin on-chain analysis, institutional ETF flows, and digital asset price action, his work at Coindoo has been cited by other news agencies and consistently covers market developments with a focus on data-driven reporting across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. Over the years, Kosta has contributed to multiple crypto media outlets in different regions, authoring over 6,000 articles across the sector. His reporting spans cryptocurrency markets and the broader fintech industry, tracking not only price action but also the technological and regulatory forces shaping the ecosystem. To support his analysis, Kosta actively leverages on-chain data and metrics from leading platforms such as Santiment, Glassnode, and CryptoQuant, enabling deeper, evidence-based market insights. He believes in the power of transparency and the data that underpins the blockchain ecosystem. His academic background in Marketing Management from Denmark further complements his analytical approach, adding a strong understanding of communication strategy and content positioning to his work.
2026-07-15 02:47 3mo ago
2026-07-14 18:18 3mo ago
Pump.fun uvolnil $PUMP tokeny za více než 19 milionů USD
PUMP Pump.fun
CoinGecko News 86
Original source text
Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that became a cash machine in 2024, just started writing checks. On July 14, the platform’s team wallet began distributing unlocked $PUMP tokens, moving over $6 million worth in the first hour alone. By the time the dust settled, total distributions had blown past $19 million.

The transfers are part of a broader unlock event that hit on July 12, two days prior, when approximately 82.5 billion $PUMP tokens were released from their vesting schedule. That release, roughly 29% of the token’s circulating supply at the time, marked the first major cliff unlock since Pump.fun’s initial coin offering a year ago.

Advertisement

Where the tokens went Here’s the breakdown. Of the 82.5 billion tokens unlocked, about 50 billion were earmarked for the team and 32.5 billion for early investors. In total, around 52 billion $PUMP tokens, valued at approximately $76 million, were distributed from the team wallet.

That still leaves roughly $60 million worth of tokens sitting in the treasury.

The $PUMP token has a total supply of 1 trillion tokens. The tokenomics split looks like this: 20% allocated to the team, 13% to existing investors, 24% to the community and ecosystem, with smaller tranches going to the foundation, liquidity provisions, and an ecosystem fund. The remaining 33% was sold during the 2025 ICO, which raised roughly $1.32 billion.

The platform behind the token Pump.fun generated hundreds of millions in platform fees since its launch, with daily revenue peaking above $7 million during the memecoin frenzy.

The $PUMP token itself launched via ICO in mid-2025, and the vesting schedule was designed with a one-year cliff followed by linear unlocks. The July 12 event was that cliff coming due.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:47 3mo ago
2026-07-14 20:13 3mo ago
Canaan zvýšil bitcoinovou pokladnu na 1 915 BTC
BTC Bitcoin
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Canaan Inc., the company that builds the machines other people use to mine Bitcoin, has been quietly stacking its own pile. The NASDAQ-listed mining hardware manufacturer disclosed its June 2026 unaudited mining performance on July 14, revealing a net addition of 49 BTC to its corporate treasury.

That brings the company’s total Bitcoin stash to 1,915 BTC, valued at approximately $123.5 million. Alongside the 1,915 BTC, Canaan also holds 3,952 ETH.

Advertisement

The numbers behind Canaan’s June mining haul Canaan’s self-mining operations produced 64 BTC during June 2026. The net addition of 49 BTC reflects the difference between gross mining output and what ends up staying on the balance sheet. Some of those Bitcoin came from customer payments for hardware sales, meaning the company is accepting BTC as payment and holding it rather than converting to fiat.

According to Bitcoin treasury trackers, Canaan now ranks approximately 33rd among public companies globally in terms of Bitcoin holdings.

A strategy that started paying off a year ago The company formally adopted its digital asset holding policy in July 2025, making an explicit corporate commitment to building long-term BTC reserves. At that point, the firm held roughly 1,484 BTC.

By the end of May 2026, the company held 1,867 BTC, meaning the June addition of 49 BTC net represents a steady monthly cadence of accumulation. From July 2025 to July 2026, the treasury has grown from 1,484 BTC to 1,915 BTC — an increase of about 431 BTC, or roughly 29%, in a single year.

As an ASIC chip designer and manufacturer, Canaan sits at the intersection of hardware production, self-mining operations, and treasury management. Unlike companies that issue debt or equity to fund BTC purchases, Canaan generates Bitcoin through its mining operations and receives it as payment from customers.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:47 3mo ago
2026-07-14 21:14 3mo ago
Maelstrom financuje obranu Bitcoinu proti kvantovým počítačům
BTC Bitcoin
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Maelstrom, the family office run by BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, just handed its sixth Bitcoin Grant Program award to one of the network’s most quietly important builders. Tadge Dryja, best known as a co-creator of the Lightning Network, will use the funding to research how to harden Bitcoin against the looming threat of quantum computers.

What Dryja is actually working on The grant supports Dryja’s research into post-quantum cryptographic defenses for Bitcoin. Bitcoin’s current security relies on elliptic-curve cryptography, which works brilliantly against today’s computers. The concern, shared by a growing number of researchers, is that sufficiently powerful quantum machines could eventually break those protections.

Dryja has already been working on solutions. He’s developed a commit/reveal scheme he calls “Lifeboat,” designed to protect transactions from quantum attacks. He’s also proposed a mechanism called OP_CIV for post-quantum signature aggregation, which would let Bitcoin verify quantum-resistant signatures more efficiently.

Advertisement

Dryja’s broader body of work includes Utreexo, a data structure that could dramatically reduce the storage requirements for running a Bitcoin full node.

Inside the Maelstrom Bitcoin Grant Program Maelstrom launched its Bitcoin Grant Program on July 17, 2024. The program offers grants between $50,000 and $150,000 for a 12-month period, paid out monthly in BTC, USDC, or USDT. The focus areas are resilience, scalability, censorship resistance, and privacy.

Dryja is the sixth recipient. A June 2026 annual report detailed the accomplishments of four prior grantees, whose work has spanned privacy-enhancing tools like Payjoin and Silent Payments, along with scalability improvements to Bitcoin Core.

Payjoin is a transaction method that makes blockchain analysis significantly harder by blending sender and receiver inputs. Silent Payments let users receive Bitcoin without reusing addresses, which is a privacy upgrade that sounds boring until you realize address reuse is one of the easiest ways to deanonymize someone on-chain.

The specific dollar amount of Dryja’s grant hasn’t been disclosed. But given the program’s stated range, we’re looking at something in the $50,000 to $150,000 neighborhood.

The quantum clock is ticking, kind of No quantum computer today can break Bitcoin’s cryptography. Current machines don’t have nearly enough stable qubits to run Shor’s algorithm against the elliptic curves Bitcoin uses. The National Institute of Standards and Technology has already standardized several post-quantum cryptographic algorithms for broader use, which creates a foundation that Bitcoin researchers can build on.

Dryja’s Lifeboat proposal doesn’t require Bitcoin to adopt entirely new signature schemes overnight. Instead, it creates an emergency mechanism that users could activate to protect their funds if quantum capabilities suddenly leapt forward.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:42 3mo ago
2026-07-14 21:14 3mo ago
SharpLink vytěžil 499 ETH ze stakingu a drží 887 673 ETH
ETH Ethereum
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
SharpLink, the Nasdaq-listed Ethereum treasury company trading under the ticker SBET, pulled in 499 ETH from staking rewards in just the past week. That brings the company’s cumulative staking haul to 23,490 ETH since it kicked off its treasury strategy, and its total Ethereum holdings now sit at 887,673 ETH.

For context, that’s the second-largest Ethereum stash held by any publicly traded company on the planet. The only outfit holding more is Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), which controls over 5.7 million ETH.

The MicroStrategy playbook, but for Ethereum SharpLink provides what it calls structured equity exposure to Ethereum. Investors buy SBET stock on Nasdaq, and that stock price is heavily tied to how much ETH the company holds per share. It’s a way to get Ethereum exposure through a traditional brokerage account without touching a wallet or an exchange.

SharpLink actively stakes its holdings. That 499 ETH earned in a single week is essentially passive income generated from helping secure the Ethereum network. The 23,490 ETH accumulated through staking alone represents a meaningful addition to the balance sheet without the company spending a single dollar.

Advertisement

SharpLink maintains a public ETH dashboard that breaks down its holdings, staking rewards, and per-share ETH concentration metrics. The average purchase price across its entire portfolio sits at $3,586 per ETH, according to that dashboard.

Recent buying spree signals confidence SharpLink resumed active Ethereum purchases in June 2026 after what appears to have been a pause in direct buying. On June 25, the company scooped up 5,000 ETH. Shortly after, it grabbed another 10,000 ETH at an average price of $1,611 per coin. That’s notably below its overall portfolio average of $3,586, which means those recent buys actually improved the company’s cost basis.

The purchases pushed total holdings from approximately 872,984 ETH in May 2026 to the current 887,673 ETH figure. That’s a net increase of roughly 14,700 ETH in about two months, combining both direct purchases and staking rewards.

The company funds these acquisitions partly through at-the-market equity offerings, a mechanism that lets it sell new shares gradually at prevailing market prices rather than through a single large offering. It also executes share repurchases, creating a two-way flow that management can use to manage dilution and signal confidence.

The competitive landscape for public ETH treasuries SharpLink’s position as the number-two public Ethereum holder is noteworthy because this category barely existed a couple of years ago. Bitmine Immersion Technologies, the leader in this space, holds over 5.7 million ETH. SharpLink’s nearly 888,000 ETH treasury held approximately 521,939 ETH as of August 2025. By May 2026, that had grown to roughly 872,984 ETH. Now it’s at 887,673 ETH. The company has added over 365,000 ETH to its balance sheet in less than a year.

That 499 ETH weekly staking reward represents roughly a 0.056% weekly return, or about 2.9% annualized if the rate holds steady. Those staking rewards get added to the total, which then generates more rewards the following week.

What this means for investors For anyone watching SBET as a proxy for Ethereum exposure, the key metric isn’t just total ETH held. It’s ETH per share. At-the-market offerings dilute the share count, while ETH purchases and staking rewards increase the numerator. The interplay between those two forces determines whether shareholders are actually gaining or losing ETH exposure over time.

SharpLink’s dashboard transparency is designed to address exactly this concern, giving investors real-time visibility into whether the company is creating or destroying value on a per-share basis.

The recent purchases at $1,611 suggest management sees current prices as attractive. Buying ETH at roughly 55% below the portfolio’s average cost of $3,586 also means the overall position was significantly underwater at the time of purchase.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:42 3mo ago
2026-07-15 01:58 3mo ago
Bitmine hlásí příjmy 45,7 milionu USD ze stakingu ETH
ETH Ethereum
CoinGecko News 72
Original source text
Bitmine Immersion Technologies reported $45.7 million in revenue from Ether staking and validator operations for the most recent quarter, reflecting a major shift in the company’s business model following the introduction of its institutional-grade Ethereum staking platform in March.

Staking dominates revenue streamsFor the three months ending May 31, staking activities contributed approximately 98% of Bitmine’s total revenue, according to the company’s latest 10-Q filing. In contrast, self-mined Bitcoin operations generated $624,000, while consulting services added $168,000.

Bitmine disclosed that it has allocated 85% of its Ether holdings—about 4.9 million ETH—into staking. Chairman Tom Lee stated that this is the largest amount of ETH staked by any single entity worldwide.

Bitmine’s projected annual ETH staking reward reaches $284 million at full scale, when both the company’s and its partners’ Ether are fully staked through MAVAN and affiliated staking operations.

A year ago, Bitmine’s quarterly revenue totaled $2 million, driven mainly by equipment leasing, highlighting how the company’s focus on Ethereum staking has transformed its income structure.

Launch and expansion of MAVAN platformThe launch of MAVAN in March marked a new phase for Bitmine. MAVAN, an institutional-grade Ethereum staking service, manages validator infrastructure on behalf of Bitmine and external customers. The platform emerged after Bitmine’s acquisition of Pier Two Holdings, an Australian operator specializing in non-custodial validator services.

Originally developed to support Bitmine’s own Ethereum treasury, MAVAN has grown to serve institutional investors, custodians, and partners within the Ethereum ecosystem.

Mini dictionary: MAVAN (Made in America VAlidator Network) is a staking and validator infrastructure platform focused on institutional-grade Ethereum staking, supporting both Bitmine’s assets and third-party clients.

Robinhood Chain drives Ethereum growthBitmine’s chairman Tom Lee also pointed to the rapid success of Robinhood Chain, a new decentralized trading platform that launched on July 1. He reported that dollar trading volumes on Robinhood Chain have already surpassed $1 billion.

According to Lee, Robinhood Chain now handles more trading volume than any other decentralized exchange, underscoring both its significance and the utility of Ethereum as the underlying blockchain.

Robinhood Chain, utilizing ETH as its native gas token, has introduced millions of users to Ethereum-based transactions, with all network fees and settlement processes occurring directly on the Ethereum blockchain.

Lee emphasized that Robinhood’s 27 million users are now paying transaction fees in ETH, signaling a shift toward mainstream viewing of ETH as a form of money within the platform’s ecosystem.

Quarter EndedTotal RevenueStaking RevenueBTC MiningConsultingMay 31, 2026$45.7 million$44.8 million$624,000$168,000May 31, 2025$2 millionNot disclosedMajority of revenueMinimalDisclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
2026-07-15 02:37 3mo ago
2026-07-14 23:54 3mo ago
Circle vyhrála arbitráž s fondem Heka Funds
USDT Tether
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
The stablecoin cold war just got a lot less cold. Circle, the company behind USDC, banned a Tether-backed investment fund from its platform in late 2023 over concerns that the fund was engaging in trading activity designed to manipulate markets in favor of Circle’s biggest rival.

The fund fought back with a $49 million arbitration claim. It lost. And now the details are public, offering a rare window into just how aggressively the two dominant stablecoin issuers are competing for control of a market worth roughly $307 billion.

What happened with Heka Funds The fund in question is Heka Funds, a Malta-based investment vehicle managed by London’s Abraxas Capital Management and backed by Tether. Circle determined that Heka’s trading patterns on its platform looked suspiciously like market manipulation, specifically the kind that would benefit Tether at Circle’s expense.

That’s exactly what Circle did. It banned Heka Funds from its platform entirely.

Advertisement

Heka didn’t take it quietly. The fund initiated arbitration proceedings in 2024, claiming Circle’s ban cost it $49 million in lost profits. The arbitrator disagreed. The ruling came down in Circle’s favor, validating the company’s decision to remove Heka from its ecosystem.

The stablecoin rivalry beneath the surface To understand why this matters, you need to understand the dynamics between USDC and USDT. These two tokens together dominate the stablecoin market, which sits at approximately $307 billion in total value. Tether’s USDT is the larger of the two by a significant margin, but Circle’s USDC has carved out its own substantial position, particularly among institutional users and in regulated markets.

Tether has long operated with a degree of opacity that has drawn scrutiny from regulators and skeptics alike. Circle, by contrast, has positioned itself as the compliance-first alternative, publishing regular attestation reports and pursuing a more transparent operational model.

Whether Tether itself had any direct involvement in or knowledge of Heka’s trading strategies remains unclear from the available details. But the optics alone, a Tether-backed entity accused of manipulating markets on Circle’s platform, tell you everything about the trust deficit between these two camps.

What this tells us about stablecoin oversight This dispute, which became public on July 14, highlights a broader shift in how stablecoin issuers police activity on their platforms.

Circle’s decision to ban Heka suggests that stablecoin issuers are now treating platform surveillance as a core business function. When your token’s credibility depends on maintaining a stable peg and market confidence, letting potentially manipulative trading slide is an existential risk.

What this means for investors The $49 million arbitration claim from Heka puts a number on the financial stakes. That figure represents what a single fund claims it lost from being cut off from Circle’s ecosystem.

Circle’s arbitration victory gives it a concrete data point to present to institutional allocators who care about governance and risk management.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:37 3mo ago
2026-07-14 21:36 3mo ago
0x zprostředkoval obchody v objemu 200 miliard USD
ZRX 0x
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
KEY TAKEAWAYS

0x Protocol has facilitated over $200 billion in cumulative trading volume since its 2016 launch, with more than 500 teams integrating its Swap API across 20 or more blockchains. The protocol’s core innovation uses off-chain order relay with on-chain settlement, reducing gas costs by keeping order matching off the blockchain while settling trades on-chain securely. In June 2026, 0x launched a Cross-Chain API with 12 bridge partners, enabling asset transfers between different blockchain networks through a single developer integration point. ZRX’s market capitalization sits between $85 million and $100 million as of April 2026, despite powering infrastructure used by Coinbase, MetaMask, Robinhood, and Phantom wallet. A January 2026 SwapNet exploit drained $13.4 million from Matcha Meta users through a third-party routing contract, though 0x’s core protocol contracts remained uncompromised throughout. 0x Protocol is open-source infrastructure that enables decentralized token trading across multiple blockchains. It does not operate as a single exchange. Instead, it provides a standardized set of smart contracts and developer tools that allow applications to embed swap functionality without building their own order matching systems. 

CoinMarketCap’s overview describes it as a universal liquidity layer that aggregates pricing from automated market makers and order books across 16 or more blockchains. The protocol matters because fragmented liquidity is the central problem in decentralized finance. Hundreds of exchanges and liquidity pools exist across different blockchains, each with different pricing and depth. 

0x aggregates these sources through its Swap API, allowing wallets like MetaMask and Phantom, exchanges like Coinbase and Robinhood, and portfolio trackers to offer best-price execution without connecting to each liquidity source individually. Over 500 teams have integrated the API, according to Bitget’s analysis.

Analysis: The gap between 0x’s infrastructure usage and its token valuation is the protocol’s defining tension. The platform has facilitated over $200 billion in volume, yet ZRX trades at a market cap of approximately $85 million to $100 million as of April 2026. That is roughly what a mid-sized restaurant chain might be worth.

How Off-Chain Relay and On-Chain Settlement Work 0x’s foundational innovation from 2017 separated order management from trade execution. Older decentralized exchanges put every step on the blockchain. 

Order placement, cancellation, matching, and settlement all consume gas fees. 0x moved the first three steps off-chain, recording only the final trade on the blockchain. That hybrid approach reduced costs while preserving decentralized settlement security, as Gate Learn explained.

The system operates through three participants: Makers supply liquidity and set pricing by signing orders off-chain. Relayers host and distribute these order books. Takers accept trade offers, and when a taker agrees to a maker’s price, 0x’s smart contracts settle the swap on-chain, ensuring both sides complete simultaneously. 

The v4 Settler contract suite handles the final atomic settlement. In 2024, 0x v2 introduced a new pricing engine designed specifically for on-chain applications, optimizing trade execution and expanding liquidity source access. 

As of 2026, the protocol supports over 20 chains: Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche, Scroll, Linea, Blast, Mode, Mantle, Unichain, Berachain, Ink, Plasma, Sonic, and Monad, according to Bitget’s pricing analysis. In March 2026, the team announced that HyperEVM, a high-performance Ethereum Layer 2, went live via the 0x Swap API.

The ZRX Token and Its Governance Role ZRX is the ERC-20 governance and utility token powering the 0x Protocol. Holders vote on protocol upgrade proposals known as ZEIPs, treasury allocation decisions, and expansion to new blockchains through the community DAO. 

Staking is built into the system: liquidity providers stake ZRX to earn a share of trading fees from market-making activity. Delegators can assign their ZRX to high-performing market makers and earn rewards, as described in Bitget’s 2026 protocol guide.

Whether governance plus staking creates sufficient economic demand to support ZRX at scale remains the token’s central question. The protocol generated the same fee structure whether ZRX was priced at $0.08 or $2.53, its all-time high from January 2018. 

In late 2025 and early 2026, ZRX faced reduced exchange accessibility, with margin and spot trading pairs delisted from Binance and a full delisting from Bitfinex, as CoinMarketCap’s analysis noted. In March 2026, Dune Analytics launched Dune Enterprise in partnership with 0x, providing enterprise-grade on-chain analytics to monitor trader behavior and liquidity routing. 

The most significant product launch was Matcha Meta, a meta-aggregator that routes trades to whichever DEX aggregator offers the best execution at any moment, sitting on top of all major aggregators, including 0x itself.

The SwapNet Exploit and Protocol Security In January 2026, a $13.4 million exploit affected Matcha Meta users through a third-party routing contract called SwapNet. The contract was closed-source and lacked sufficient validation of user-supplied parameters, allowing an attacker to redirect funds that users had approved for trading. 

The 0x team confirmed that its core protocol contracts were not compromised, and the affected contract was disabled, according to Bitget’s chronology. The incident underscored persistent DeFi security risks but did not affect the core protocol’s integrity. 0x continues to operate a bug bounty program to detect vulnerabilities before exploitation. 

The broader question for DeFi protocol security is whether aggregator architectures that route through third-party contracts can adequately vet every integration partner.

Regulatory Implications 0x Protocol operates as a permissionless infrastructure with no centralized controlling entity. Treasury’s March 2026 report to Congress acknowledged that the BSA/AML framework does not fully account for DeFi protocols with distributed governance. 

The SEC’s Crypto Task Force has discussed balancing financial privacy with national security transparency. Whether infrastructure protocols like 0x face direct regulatory obligations depends on pending congressional clarification.

What’s Next? The Cross-Chain API, launched in June 2026 with 12 bridge partners, represents 0x’s push beyond single-chain liquidity aggregation. Solana ecosystem integration and continued HyperEVM support expand the protocol’s addressable market. A long-standing community debate about implementing sustainable protocol fees remains unresolved. 

If fees are introduced, they could create direct token-level value capture but risk making 0x less competitive against rivals like Uniswap and 1inch. Token performance projections are speculative and should not be treated as financial guidance. Digital assets carry a significant risk of loss.

FAQs What is 0x Protocol?
0x Protocol is an open-source infrastructure providing smart contracts and APIs that enable decentralized token trading across 20 or more blockchains without requiring a centralized exchange intermediary.

How does 0x reduce trading costs?
0x uses off-chain order relay with on-chain settlement, keeping order matching and management off the blockchain to avoid gas fees while settling only the final trade on-chain securely.

What is ZRX used for?
ZRX is the governance and utility token that allows holders to vote on protocol upgrades, stake for trading fee rewards, and participate in treasury decisions through the 0x DAO.

Which apps use the 0x Protocol?
Over 500 teams integrate 0x, including major products like Coinbase, MetaMask, Robinhood, and Phantom Wallet, using its Swap API to offer best-price decentralized token trading.

Is 0x Protocol the same as a DEX?
0x Protocol is not an exchange for end users but rather a trading protocol layer that provides liquidity aggregation and order routing infrastructure for wallets and DEX platforms.

What blockchains does 0x support?
0x supports over 20 blockchains as of 2026, including Ethereum, Solana, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, BSC, Avalanche, Monad, Scroll, Linea, and several additional networks.

Was the 0x Protocol hacked in 2026?
In January 2026, a $13.4 million exploit affected Matcha Meta users through a third-party SwapNet contract, but 0x’s core protocol smart contracts remained uncompromised throughout.

References What Is 0x Protocol (ZRX) And How Does It Work (CoinMarketCap, 2026) 0x Protocol (ZRX) Price Prediction and Analysis (Bitget, April 2026) 0x Protocol Complete Guide (Gate Learn, April 2026) 0x Protocol 2026: Cross-Chain DeFi Guide (Bitget Academy, March 2026)
2026-07-15 02:27 3mo ago
2026-07-14 17:55 3mo ago
Anchorage Digital spouští staking TRX a custody pro TRC-20
TRX Tron
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Anchorage Digital, the $4.2 billion crypto bank with a federal charter, now supports TRON network staking and custody for TRC-20 assets. The integration gives institutional players a regulated pathway into a blockchain that quietly handles more stablecoin volume than most competitors combined.

What Anchorage is actually offering Anchorage first announced its intention to integrate the TRON blockchain on March 26, 2026, starting with custody services for TRX, TRON’s native token, alongside support for TRC-20 assets. Those are the tokens built on TRON’s network, similar to how ERC-20 tokens sit on Ethereum.

As of July 2026, the custody piece for TRX is fully operational. Native TRX staking is being rolled out in phases. That staking component matters because it transforms TRX from a dormant balance sheet item into a yield-generating asset for institutional portfolios.

Advertisement

Anchorage co-founder Nathan McCauley and TRON founder Justin Sun have both signaled that the collaboration is designed to enhance secure institutional access to TRON’s ecosystem.

Why a federally chartered bank matters here Founded in 2017, Anchorage became the first nationally chartered digital asset bank in the US when the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency granted it a trust charter in January 2021. Its investor roster includes Andreessen Horowitz, Goldman Sachs, KKR, GIC (Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund), and Visa.

TRON’s quiet dominance in stablecoins TRON’s mainnet launched in May 2018 under founder Justin Sun. The volume of USDT circulating on TRON exceeds $86 to $90 billion as of early 2026. The network’s 370 million-plus user accounts signal genuine adoption at scale.

What this means for investors The immediate implication is straightforward: institutional capital now has a compliant channel to gain exposure to TRX and TRC-20 tokens. First comes custody (check). Then comes staking yield (in progress).

TRON’s association with Justin Sun, who has faced regulatory scrutiny and legal actions in multiple jurisdictions, remains a consideration for compliance-conscious institutions. Anchorage’s federal oversight arguably mitigates some of that reputational risk by providing a layer of regulatory validation, but it doesn’t eliminate it entirely.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:17 3mo ago
2026-07-14 20:00 3mo ago
Chainlink hlásí 43,3 mld. USD v TVS
LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Chainlink Posts $43.3B TVS and $32.18T in Cumulative Transaction Value@chainlink is reporting $43.3 billion in Total Value Secured (TVS) and $32.18 trillion in cumulative Transaction Value Enabled (TVE), along with 19.59 billion onchain verified data outputs. The numbers, shared by the project, reflect the scale of infrastructure quietly sitting beneath much of decentralized finance today.

TVS and TVE measure two distinct things. TVS represents the aggregate dollar value of assets currently dependent on Chainlink's oracles across DeFi protocols. TVE is the all-time sum of transaction value that Chainlink's services have helped facilitate since inception. As Chainlink's own metrics page notes, TVE is calculated by taking the sum of the USD value associated with each transaction utilizing a Chainlink oracle.

To put the TVS figure in context: it is not the same as total value locked, the metric most DeFi observers focus on. TVS measures the value of assets that depend on a network's data services, whether that is price feeds for lending protocols or cross-chain token transfers. A single price feed can underpin value across dozens of protocols on multiple networks simultaneously.

Institutional Adoption and Expanding Network ReachThe figures sit within a broader growth story for the network. Chainlink's Q1 2026 quarterly review showed its Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) processed over $18 billion in transfer volume during the quarter, a 319% year-over-year increase. The same period saw Amundi, Europe's largest asset manager, launch a tokenized mutual fund powered by Chainlink that reached $400 million in assets under management within three weeks. Robinhood also named Chainlink as the oracle platform for Robinhood Chain, and the Bank of England selected the network to participate in its Synchronisation Lab for synchronized settlement between central bank money and onchain securities.

On the institutional side, data tracked by CoinLaw shows Chainlink holds roughly 59% of the tracked oracle market by TVS, with its CCIP now certified to SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standards. Major financial institutions including Swift, Euroclear, Fidelity International, UBS, and J.P. Morgan's Kinexys have adopted Chainlink's infrastructure.

The $LINK token has not kept pace with network growth in this cycle, but the protocol's operational metrics continue to move in one direction. For a piece of infrastructure that most users never directly interact with, Chainlink's reach across DeFi and traditional finance is difficult to ignore.

Sources
Chainlink Official Metrics, chain.link
Chainlink Q1 2026 Quarterly Review, chain.link
Chainlink Statistics 2026: TVS, CCIP and Market Share, CoinLaw
2026-07-15 02:17 3mo ago
2026-07-14 20:50 3mo ago
Chainlink roste po migraci Mantle na CCIP
LINK Chainlink MNT Mantle PORTAL Portal
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Chainlink price has jumped more than 5% after Mantle completed the migration of its $2.5 billion Super Portal to Chainlink’s cross-chain infrastructure, extending a crypto market rally driven by softer U.S. inflation data.

Summary

Chainlink price rose over 5% after Mantle migrated its $2.5 billion Super Portal to Chainlink’s CCIP. Whale accumulation, rising open interest, and record wallet growth have strengthened LINK’s bullish momentum. Technical indicators point to $8.40 as the next key resistance, while losing $8.00 could weaken the rally. According to data from crypto.news, Chainlink (LINK) price traded around $8.29 after briefly touching $8.40, extending its weekly gain to roughly 7%.

The move came as Bitcoin climbed above $64,600 and Ethereum approached $1,875 after U.S. inflation data strengthened expectations that the Federal Reserve could adopt a less restrictive policy later this year. Total crypto market capitalization also advanced more than 3% to about $2.30 trillion.

Mantle’s infrastructure upgrade adds to a string of recent enterprise integrations for Chainlink. Aave recently selected the protocol for automated vault rebalancing, while Robinhood has incorporated Chainlink infrastructure into its expanding Layer-2 ecosystem.

Network adoption has also continued on-chain, with the number of non-empty Ethereum wallets holding LINK surpassing 900,000 for the first time.

On-chain accumulation suggests large investors positioned ahead of the announcement rather than reacting afterward. Wallets holding more than 1,000 LINK reached their highest level this year, while addresses controlling over 100,000 LINK expanded to a record 805.

These purchases absorbed much of the selling pressure created by the scheduled unlock of 21 million LINK tokens, reducing the impact of the additional supply entering circulation.

Derivatives traders have joined the rally. Open interest increased roughly 10% alongside the price advance, showing fresh leveraged participation instead of a short-lived spot spike. The combination of rising price and rising open interest typically suggests new positions entering the market rather than existing shorts simply closing.

Technical breakout places $8.40 and $8.70 in focus The daily chart shows LINK pressing against the upper boundary of a descending wedge that has contained price since early June. Tuesday’s rally pushed the token above $8.20 and toward immediate resistance near $8.40, where sellers rejected price earlier in the session.

Chainlink daily price chart — July 15 | Source: crypto.news A confirmed daily close above that level would strengthen the breakout case and expose the next resistance zone around $8.70, followed by psychological resistance near $9.00.

Momentum indicators have also improved. The daily RSI has climbed to around 60 after recovering from oversold territory, showing buyers have regained control without entering overbought conditions. The Aroon Up indicator has returned to 100 while the Aroon Down remains near single-digit readings, highlighting a renewed bullish trend.

On the 4-hour chart, the MACD has completed a bullish crossover above the signal line, while the Chaikin Money Flow remains positive above zero, showing capital continues to enter the market.

Chainlink 4-hour price chart — July 15 | Source: crypto.news CoinGlass liquidation data reinforces the technical picture. The one-week heatmap shows a dense concentration of leveraged short positions clustered between $8.15 and $8.30, many of which were cleared during the latest rally. Above current prices, another sizeable liquidity pocket sits around $8.45-$8.70, creating a potential magnet if buyers maintain momentum.

Chainlink liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass Loss of $8.00 support would weaken the bullish case Several risks could still interrupt LINK’s recovery. Markets remain sensitive to upcoming U.S. Producer Price Index data and any Federal Reserve comments that challenge expectations for easier monetary policy. Renewed geopolitical tensions or another rise in oil prices could also reduce appetite for risk assets across digital markets.

From a technical perspective, failure to hold above the $8.20 breakout zone would leave $8.00 as the first important support.

A decisive break below that level could pull LINK back toward the $7.70-$7.50 demand area, where the liquidation heatmap shows another large concentration of leveraged positions. Such a move would invalidate the immediate breakout structure and postpone any attempt to challenge the $9.00 resistance zone.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
2026-07-15 02:17 3mo ago
2026-07-15 01:28 3mo ago
Circle a Grupo BIND spouštějí v Argentině regulovaný přístup k USDC
USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News 78
Original source text
Circle and Argentine financial group BIND have struck a deal to open institutional access to USDC through BIND’s digital assets platform, giving corporations and financial intermediaries a regulated on-ramp to dollar-denominated stablecoins in a country where the peso has essentially disintegrated.

The partnership, announced on July 14 during Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire’s visit to Buenos Aires, will channel USDC access through BEN, BIND’s digital assets platform, on a peer-to-peer basis. BIND operates as a registered virtual asset service provider (known locally as a PSAV), which means it’s a licensed financial institution building rails for companies that need dollar exposure but face a currency that has lost 99.8% of its value against the USD since 2009.

What the deal actually looks like BEN will serve as the infrastructure layer connecting eligible Argentine institutions to USDC, covering payments, treasury operations, and broader digital asset transactions, all wrapped in a compliance framework that BIND is keen to emphasize.

Advertisement

“Through BEN, we seek to provide companies with transparent, secure, and efficient access to digital dollar infrastructure within a framework designed to support regulatory compliance and operational integrity,” said Andrés Meta, a Grupo BIND shareholder.

Circle isn’t treating this as a one-off announcement. The company is hiring a senior director based in Buenos Aires and actively pursuing additional partnerships with local banks and fintech companies. This follows Circle’s existing footprint in Brazil, where it already has a team of eight people, and planned expansions into Mexico and Colombia.

Why Argentina is ground zero for stablecoins The peso recently hit yet another record low against the dollar, extending a collapse that has made the currency almost worthless in relative terms over the past decade and a half. Persistent inflation, capital controls, and a general distrust in the local monetary system have turned Argentina into one of the most active stablecoin markets on the planet.

What’s changing now is the institutional dimension. Retail adoption was already widespread. This partnership is about bringing corporations, financial intermediaries, and treasury departments into the fold through regulated channels. When individuals buy USDC on an exchange, it’s useful but fragmented. When institutions get compliant access through a licensed financial entity like BIND, it opens the door to much larger capital flows, corporate treasury management in digital dollars, and cross-border payment infrastructure that actually scales.

Circle has also been engaging with Argentine regulatory bodies, including the Central Bank and the Ministry of Economy, to ensure the integration of digital assets within the traditional financial system doesn’t run afoul of existing rules. Allaire has expressed optimism about regulatory advancements regarding how banks treat stablecoins in Argentina, suggesting the groundwork is being laid for a more formalized framework.

What this means for the broader market Circle’s simultaneous push into Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia suggests the company sees the entire region as a strategic priority for USDC distribution. Tether’s USDT has historically dominated stablecoin usage in Latin America, particularly in peer-to-peer and informal markets. Circle’s strategy of partnering with regulated financial institutions like BIND targets the institutional and corporate segment where compliance requirements make USDC’s regulatory positioning a genuine advantage over less transparent alternatives.

The risk, as always in Argentina, is regulatory whiplash. The country has a long history of economic policy U-turns, capital control changes, and political volatility that can reshape the operating environment overnight. Circle’s engagement with the Central Bank and Ministry of Economy suggests awareness of this risk, but awareness and immunity are very different things.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-15 02:01 3mo ago
2026-07-14 12:05 3mo ago
Bank of America drží doporučení Buy na Netflix před výsledky
NFLX Netflix
FMP Stock News 78
Original source text
Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX, XETRA:NFC) remains well positioned for long-term growth despite a roughly 20% decline in its shares this year, according to Bank of America, which reiterated its ‘Buy’ rating and $125 price objective ahead of the company's second quarter earnings report due on Thursday.

The bank wrote that the stock's year-to-date decline reflects investor concerns over engagement trends, the potential impact of artificial intelligence on content creation, and heightened competition following recent media mergers and acquisitions. However, it argued that Netflix has successfully navigated similar periods of skepticism in the past.

Bank of America highlighted that subscriber growth slowed significantly in 2022, contributing to a share price decline of more than 50%, before the company responded with initiatives such as paid sharing and its ad-supported tier, which helped accelerate growth again. The analysts also noted that investor concerns over margin expansion in late 2023 were followed by another year of strong operational execution.

The firm wrote that Netflix's management has "consistently demonstrated an ability to adapt to changing market conditions, execute effectively and create long-term shareholder value."

Looking ahead to Q2 results, Bank of America expects largely in-line financial results, with investor attention likely to center on the company's outlook for the second half of the year, engagement trends, and management's commentary on acquisition appetite and broader strategic priorities.

The analysts noted that sentiment toward the stock remains subdued following its recent decline and suggested that stronger-than-expected results and raised guidance could ease investor concerns. Conversely, signs of further slowing in the business could reinforce bearish views and pressure the stock's valuation.

Bank of America also outlined risks cited by bearish investors, including slowing engagement, increased competition from platforms such as YouTube and short-form video services, the potential impact of AI on content creation, and uncertainty surrounding a more active approach to acquisitions compared with Netflix's historical strategy.

Despite those concerns, the bank maintained that Netflix has a significant runway for subscriber and advertising growth, supported by its global scale, expanding advertising business, and strong balance sheet, which it believes will continue to support shareholder returns over time.

Shares traded hands at $74 on Tuesday afternoon.