Market Signal Briefing

The precious metal's prices climbed above the psychologically important $5,000-an-ounce level for the first time.

Resources Investor Relations Journalists Agencies Client Login Send a Release News Products Contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Significant Losses In Beta Bionics To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you suffered significant losses in Beta Bionics stock or options and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). 

[You may also click here for additional information]

, /PRNewswire/ -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Beta Bionics, Inc. ("Beta Bionics" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BBNX).

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

James (Josh) Wilson, Faruqi & Faruqi Senior Partner (PRNewsfoto/Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP) On January 9, 2026, shares of Beta Bionics declined sharply in trading, following the company's disclosure of preliminary fourth-quarter 2025 performance metrics that fell short of market expectations.

The company reported lower-than-anticipated new patient starts for its iLet automated insulin delivery system, prompting investor concerns regarding near-term adoption trends and revenue growth.

On this news, Beta Bionics stock fell roughly $11.85 or 37.04% to close at $20.14, on January 9, 2026.

To learn more about the Beta Bionics investigation, go to www.faruqilaw.com/BBNX or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

Also from this source

Scan QR code to install app

Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.

Artificial intelligence (AI) spending is growing fast, and these blue-chip tech stocks can help you profit from it.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is ushering in a wave of opportunity across the economy. Gartner estimates AI spending will reach $2.5 trillion in 2026, up 44% year over year, and early projections point to $3.3 trillion in 2027.

Microsoft (MSFT +3.45%) and Oracle (ORCL 0.57%) are two tech giants that have robust AI capabilities. Microsoft is monetizing AI through everyday workflow tools, while Oracle is benefiting from the surge in AI computing demand through its cloud infrastructure. Here's what can sustain these companies' growth in the next five years.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Microsoft Microsoft has been a rewarding growth stock, doubling in value since 2021, and its run is far from over. Its revenue rose 18% year over year in the recent quarter, primarily driven by demand for AI features in Microsoft 365 and the Azure enterprise AI platform.

Microsoft has integrated its family of Copilot AI assistants across its productivity offerings, helping drive demand for its flagship productivity software. The Azure AI enterprise business is also growing rapidly and taking share in a $390 billion cloud market. This growth reflects the robust cloud infrastructure that Microsoft has built to deliver cutting-edge services that help companies do more with their data, such as building their own AI applications.

Today's Change

(

3.45

%) $

15.55

Current Price

$

466.69

Demand for its offerings is pushing Microsoft to spend aggressively on data center expansion that could weigh on margins. But this spending also underscores Microsoft's financial fortitude, as it generated a whopping $147 billion in cash from operations over the trailing 12 months. This cash flow is fueling necessary investments to advance its AI capabilities, enhancing its competitive position.

The stock is reasonably priced at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 27. Investors can expect the stock to perform roughly in line with the business's future growth, with analysts currently forecasting 13% annualized earnings growth over the coming years.

2. Oracle Oracle's accelerating growth in its cloud infrastructure business makes it a compelling stock to buy. Enterprises are eager to secure the servers and chips needed for AI model training. Oracle's advanced database features, chips, and robust AI training capabilities are making it an attractive option for these businesses.

Today's Change

(

-0.57

%) $

-1.02

Current Price

$

177.16

The cloud infrastructure business posted an impressive 68% year-over-year increase in revenue last quarter. While this segment accounts for just 25% of the company's total revenue, it suggests that Oracle is well positioned to gain share in the $159 billion cloud infrastructure services market. This market is expected to grow about 13% per year through 2034, according to Fortune Business Insights.

Oracle is competing with other cloud infrastructure providers like Microsoft, but its multicloud offering is one of its differentiators. This allows enterprises to run Oracle databases across multiple cloud providers. Customers value this flexibility, as Oracle's multicloud revenue grew 817% year over year in the recent quarter.

Oracle's momentum makes its current forward P/E multiple of 24 attractive. This is an attractive valuation, given analysts' expectations for 22% annualized earnings growth. At these share prices, investors could potentially double their money in five years.

John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft and Oracle. The Motley Fool recommends Gartner and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

NEW YORK, Jan. 25, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a New York State class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers or acquirers of senior notes by Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) issued pursuant and/or traceable to the Shelf Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024, and as supplemented on September 25, 2025 (together, the “Offering Documents”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

SO WHAT: If you purchased or acquired Oracle senior notes you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Oracle class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51135 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, the Offering Documents contained false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that at the time of the Offering, Oracle would require a significant amount of additional debt to build the AI infrastructure. In addition, Oracle was organizing to raise that additional debt, which would ultimately bring the creditworthiness of these bonds into question. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Oracle class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51135 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

        Laurence Rosen, Esq.
        Phillip Kim, Esq.
        The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
        275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
        New York, NY 10016
        Tel: (212) 686-1060
        Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
        Fax: (212) 202-3827
        [email protected]
        www.rosenlegal.com

'Magic City' comes alive for the 24th annual event

, /PRNewswire/ -- The 24th Annual Life Time Miami Marathon and Half presented by FP Movement once again transformed South Florida into a vibrant celebration of running, drawing a global community of more than 17,000 athletes from 49 states and 82 countries, making it one of the most globally diverse fields on record.

Despite being in Miami for less than 40 hours, highly decorated marathoner Dominic Ondoro made the most of his brief visit by capturing the men's elite title at the 24th annual Miami Marathon.

Life Time Miami Marathon presented by FP Movement Ondoro covered the 26.2-mile distance in 2:17:47 to take his first victory in the elite men's division in Miami. Turning his ankle at mile 21 proved to only be a minor nuisance. Ondoro finished more than two minutes ahead of Texas' Bradley Makuvire (2:20:12). Brazil's Ederson Vilela Pereira (2:21:18) rounded out the top three.

In the women's division, Florida's own Christina Welsh claimed the elite Marathon title in 2:42:14. She was followed by 2025 European Master's marathon champion Ellie Stevens (2:45:43) of Las Vegas and Hanna Hauschild (2:52:27) of Miami Beach.

In the Half Marathon, Colombia's Mauricio Gonzalez won the elite men's division in 1:06:17. Miami resident Paxton Smith earned his second straight runner‑up finish (1:08:27), narrowly edging out two‑time Olympic Trial qualifier Will Norris of Charlottesville, VA (1:08:41).

For the elite women, Britain's Tracy Barlow (1:17:37) earned her first Miami Half win after placing third the previous two years. She was joined on the podium by Lucy Dobbs of Indianapolis (1:19:32), who owns top 50 finishes at both the New York and Boston Marathons, and University of Miami volunteer coach McKenna Revord (1:25:10).

Sunday's sold‑out field of runners lined up on the USTAF‑certified, Boston‑qualifying course, taking in some of the city's most iconic views. The race began at Kaseya Center, stretched across the shimmering waters of Biscayne Bay to South Beach, and wound through Ocean Drive, Coconut Grove, and Miami's bustling financial district before returning downtown.

The weekend also featured Saturday's Life Time Tropical 5K, where former Venezuelan Olympian Luis Orta claimed his fifth victory.

Among Sunday's field were 36 runners representing the Life Time Foundation. These athletes each raised money in support of the Life Time Foundation's work to improve youth movement, youth nutrition, and a healthier planet — making the Miami Marathon not only a personal milestone, but also a meaningful way to give back.

"The Miami Marathon creates unforgettable, best‑in‑class moments for athletes at every level," said Samantha Bailey, Senior Marketing Manager at Life Time. "From the elite field to the 850 Miami-Dade County elementary and middle school students completing the final mile of the race, we're reminded of the power of a community that comes together to move."

The 2026 Life Time Miami Marathon & Half sold out in mid-August 2025, the fifth consecutive and the earliest sellout in history. As the race continues to surge in popularity, organizers are already preparing to celebrate a milestone 25th anniversary in 2027, promising an unforgettable experience for athletes from around the world.

Beyond race weekend, Life Time has a strong presence in South Florida with five athletic country club destinations, including the newest at West Boca. This destination joins Life Time's established locations in Coral Gables, Miami at the Falls, Boca Raton, and Palm Beach Gardens.

The Miami Marathon & Half presented by FP Movement is among nearly 30 premier athletic events owned and produced by Life Time, including the Chicago Half Marathon, UNBOUND Gravel, and the Leadville Race Series. For more information about all Life Time athletic events including event registrations, visit https://my.lifetime.life/athletic-events.html.

About Life Time
Life Time (NYSE: LTH) empowers people to live healthy, happy lives through its more than 185 athletic country clubs across the U.S. and Canada, the complimentary and comprehensive Life Time app featuring its L•AI•C™ AI-powered health companion, and more than 30 iconic athletic events. Serving people ages 90 days to 90+ years, the Life Time ecosystem uniquely delivers healthy living, healthy aging, and healthy entertainment experiences, a range of unique healthy way of life programs, highly trusted LTH nutritional supplements and more. Recognized as a Great Place to Work®, the company is committed to upholding an exceptional culture for its 43,000 team members.

SOURCE Life Time, Inc.

On January 23, Bitcoin ETFs experienced net outflows of $103.57 million, continuing a five-day trend of withdrawals. This matters as it reflects ongoing investor caution in the cryptocurrency sector.

BlackRock’s IBIT ETF saw the largest outflows, amounting to $101.62 million. Fidelity’s FBTC ETF also recorded withdrawals, with redemptions totaling $1.95 million. These figures highlight a sustained pattern of investor retreat from these funds.

Analysts note that this trend raises questions about the current sentiment towards Bitcoin ETFs. The reasons for the persistent outflows might be varied, including market conditions and investor strategy shifts.

The impact on the broader cryptocurrency market remains to be determined. Some industry experts suggest this could indicate a reevaluation of Bitcoin’s role in diversified portfolios. However, no definitive conclusions can be drawn at this stage.

Market participants are closely monitoring the situation. They are keen to see whether this trend will continue or if a reversal is forthcoming.

The data on these outflows is crucial for understanding the current investment landscape. For now, the ongoing withdrawals suggest caution.

Further analysis and market developments are awaited to potentially alter current trends.

The recent activity in Bitcoin ETFs has caught the attention of market observers. On January 22, prior to the latest outflows, BlackRock reported a significant reduction in holdings, which some analysts interpret as a sign of shifting investment strategies. This development comes amidst fluctuating Bitcoin prices, which have hovered around $30,000, affecting investor confidence.

Fidelity’s FBTC, although experiencing smaller outflows compared to BlackRock, also reflects a cautious market sentiment. The redemptions from Fidelity’s ETF could suggest a broader trend among institutional investors reassessing their exposure to Bitcoin. This reassessment is occurring despite previous optimism about the potential for cryptocurrency funds to provide diversification benefits.

Industry insiders, such as portfolio manager Michael Carter, have noted that the sustained outflows might be linked to macroeconomic uncertainties. Carter emphasized that while Bitcoin ETFs have offered attractive returns in the past, current conditions present challenges. He added that investors are likely to remain vigilant about market signals before making further commitments.

Pending further market data, investors are expected to carefully evaluate their positions in cryptocurrency-related assets. The recent outflows from major ETFs like those managed by BlackRock and Fidelity underscore the importance of ongoing market analysis.

On January 20, the trend of outflows was already evident, with BlackRock’s IBIT ETF reporting a withdrawal of $50 million. This earlier movement set the stage for the more significant outflows seen in the following days. Some market analysts, such as Sarah Johnson from CryptoInsights, have pointed out that these withdrawals may indicate a broader shift in institutional sentiment towards Bitcoin.

The role of Bitcoin’s price volatility cannot be ignored. As of the latest data, Bitcoin’s price has fluctuated around $30,000, a level that has historically influenced investor behavior. According to Tom Lee, a strategist at Fundstrat Global Advisors, price stability is crucial for attracting long-term investors to Bitcoin ETFs. This fluctuation adds another layer of complexity to the current withdrawal trend.

Institutional behavior during this period is under scrutiny. For instance, on January 21, Fidelity’s FBTC reported smaller outflows of $500,000, highlighting a cautious approach from investors. James Liu, an analyst at Clearnomics, believes that these smaller outflows are indicative of a wait-and-see attitude among some institutional investors, who may be holding off on larger moves until the market stabilizes.

Pending further developments, the focus remains on how Bitcoin ETFs will perform in the short term. The continued monitoring of these funds, particularly those managed by BlackRock and Fidelity, will provide insight into broader market trends. The situation underscores the importance of understanding investor sentiment in a rapidly changing financial landscape.

On January 18, the Bitcoin market experienced heightened volatility, with prices dipping below $29,000 at one point. This volatility has been a key factor influencing recent ETF outflows, according to market analyst David Tran. Tran emphasizes that such price movements can deter investors seeking stability in their portfolios.

A report from CryptoAnalytics on January 19 highlighted a pattern of increasing outflows from digital asset funds, noting a 15% rise compared to the previous month. This trend appears to be driven by concerns over Bitcoin’s short-term performance, as well as broader macroeconomic factors affecting investor confidence.

BlackRock’s recent actions have been closely observed by industry participants. On January 17, the firm adjusted its portfolio allocations, reducing its exposure to Bitcoin-linked assets. This move has been interpreted by some as a strategic response to the prevailing market conditions, reflecting a cautious stance towards cryptocurrencies.

The sentiment in the cryptocurrency market remains cautious. On January 16, Fidelity released a statement acknowledging the current challenges faced by Bitcoin ETFs, while reaffirming its commitment to monitoring market dynamics and adjusting strategies accordingly. This approach underscores the ongoing uncertainty and the need for adaptive investment strategies in the cryptocurrency space.

Post Views: 1

Mon, 26/01/2026 - 1:00

XRP's burn rate has surged modestly in the last day, signaling a potential shift in market structure as network activity begins to rise after multiple days of being low.

Cover image via U.Today XRP has continued to trade in the deep red territory, but its network activity suggests that momentum might return to the market in the near term.

Amid the broad crypto market slowdown, the leading altcoin has seen a sharp surge in its burn activity, according to data from CryptoQuant. As such, it appears that a notable price resurgence might be underway.

XRP retests $1.87Following the surge in the XRP burn activity, the amount of XRP burned as fees has surged modestly by about 1% over the last day, hitting about 400 XRP on Jan. 25.

HOT Stories

The surge in the burn metric suggests a reduction in sell-off pressure, as traders are willing to hold their assets to aid in price stability.

While the metric also suggests increased use in XRP for payment purposes, which often helps to drive an increase in the price of the asset, it appears that XRP may be on track for a major comeback in price.

You Might Also Like

As the broad crypto market volatility continues to persist, XRP has continued to plunge, and it has recently retested the $1.87 level despite trading above $2 for the most part of January.

With the asset now retesting previous levels, traders are optimistic that the rising network performance could drive momentum for XRP and stabilize its price movements.

Apart from the positive network activity, other on-chain metrics still appear discouraging as XRP’s trading volume has continued to plunge, and it is currently down by 26%.

Related articles

contributor

Posted: January 26, 2026

Ethereum’s market showed mixed signals as price action weakened while longer-term structure and fundamentals stayed constructive.

After slipping below $3,000 and erasing roughly 16% of January 2026 gains, ETH entered a volatile consolidation phase. Technical patterns leaned bullish, but momentum indicators warned of a pause.

That divergence left traders focused on whether buyers could defend the structure or whether downside pressure would deepen.

Ethereum completes bullish pennant on the 1-month time frame On the 25th of January, Ethereum [ETH] was completing a bullish pennant on the monthly timeframe. The pattern attracted traders looking for long-term gains. With ETH nearing key support on lower time frames, many anticipated a breakout. 

Source: TradingView

One bullish catalyst was enough to trigger the breakout of the bullish pennant. However, the MACD’s bearish cross at $2,942 raised caution.

As the price lingered in this critical zone, the question remained: would the bullish setup hold, or would the bearish pressure trigger a correction?

Whales absorb dips, retail chases highs According to data from CryptoQuant, whales steadily accumulated Ethereum, clearly positioning themselves for long-term gains. Their confidence in Ethereum’s future was evident as they took advantage of the $2.6-$3K dip. 

Source: CryptoQuant

Meanwhile, retail investors were caught up in the short-term price swings, clustering around local highs and adding to the market’s volatility.

The stark contrast between the whales’ calculated moves and the retail crowd’s reaction painted a picture of a market torn between those with a long-term vision and those driven by the noise of immediate fluctuations.

Ethereum’s TVL holds as valuation debate grows Ethereum’s Total Value Locked (TVL) stood near $331 billion, reinforcing the network’s underlying strength despite price weakness.

Source: Token Terminal

Historically, periods when ETH traded below ecosystem value coincided with long-term accumulation zones. Previous instances produced strong recoveries after volatility subsided.

Even so, TVL alone did not guarantee immediate upside. The market still faced momentum headwinds and uncertain risk appetite.

That balance kept traders watching whether dip buying would persist or if losses would extend further.

Final Thoughts Ethereum’s recent pullback highlighted a familiar tension between short-term momentum and longer-term conviction. While whale accumulation and network strength offered structural support, near-term price direction could hinge on whether selling pressure truly exhausts or persists.

In brief Researchers warn that AI swarms could coordinate “influence campaigns” with limited human oversight. Unlike traditional botnets, swarms can adapt their messaging and vary behavior. The paper notes that existing platform safeguards may struggle to detect and contain these swarms. The era of easily detectable botnets is coming to an end, according to a new report published in Science on Thursday. In the study, researchers warned that misinformation campaigns are shifting toward autonomous AI swarms that can imitate human behavior, adapt in real time, and require little human oversight, complicating efforts to detect and stop them.

Written by a consortium of researchers, including those from Oxford, Cambridge, UC Berkeley, NYU, and the Max Planck Institute, the paper describes a digital environment in which manipulation becomes harder to identify. Instead of short bursts tied to elections or politics, these AI campaigns can sustain a narrative over longer periods of time.

“In the hands of a government, such tools could suppress dissent or amplify incumbents,” the researchers wrote. “Therefore, the deployment of defensive AI can only be considered if governed by strict, transparent, and democratically accountable frameworks.”

A swarm is a group of autonomous AI agents that work together to solve problems or complete objectives more efficiently than a single system. The researchers said AI swarms build on existing weaknesses in social media platforms, where users are often insulated from opposing viewpoints.

“False news has been shown to spread faster and more broadly than true news, deepening fragmented realities and eroding shared factual baselines,” they wrote. “Recent evidence links engagement-optimized curation to polarization, with platform algorithms amplifying divisive content even at the expense of user satisfaction, further degrading the public sphere.”

That shift is already visible on major platforms, according to Sean Ren, a computer science professor at the University of Southern California and the CEO of Sahara AI, who said that AI-driven accounts are increasingly difficult to distinguish from ordinary users.

“I think stricter KYC, or account identity validation, would help a lot here,” Ren told Decrypt. “If it’s harder to create new accounts and easier to monitor spammers, it becomes much more difficult for agents to use large numbers of accounts for coordinated manipulation.”

Earlier influence campaigns depended largely on scale rather than subtlety, with thousands of accounts posting identical messages simultaneously, which made detection comparatively straightforward. In contrast, the study said, AI swarms exhibit “unprecedented autonomy, coordination, and scale.”

Ren said content moderation alone is unlikely to stop these systems. The problem, he said, is how platforms manage identity at scale. Stronger identity checks and limits on account creation, he said, could make coordinated behavior easier to detect, even when individual posts appear human.

“If the agent can only use a small number of accounts to post content, then it’s much easier to detect suspicious usage and ban those accounts,” he said.

No simple fixThe researchers concluded that there is no single solution to the problem, with potential options including improved detection of statistically anomalous coordination and greater transparency around automated activity, but say technical measures alone are unlikely to be sufficient.

According to Ren, financial incentives also remain a persistent driver of coordinated manipulation attacks, even as platforms introduce new technical safeguards.

“These agent swarms are usually controlled by teams or vendors who are getting monetary incentives from external parties or companies to do the coordinated manipulation,” he said. “Platforms should enforce stronger KYC and spam detection mechanisms to identify and filter out agent manipulated accounts.”

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Ripple is quietly positioning itself as core infrastructure for the next phase of digital finance.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: January 25, 2026 │ 7:59 PM GMT

Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin

Popular XRP-focused analyst Crypto Sensei argues that Ripple is positioning itself as critical plumbing for the next phase of digital finance, tying together developments from Davos, Hong Kong, African remittances and even former Binance CEO CZ’s prediction of a 2026 “super-cycle” for Bitcoin.

The host notes that XRP has been trading green across major exchanges and highlights growing direct USD pairs, but the real story sits behind the price: institutional rails, stablecoin regulation and central bank pilots that could define where liquidity flows over the next few years.

Ripple’s Liquidity Layer: Hong Kong Deal & CBDC ExperimentsCrypto Sensei focuses heavily on Hong Kong’s move toward a formal stablecoin regime. Hong Kong’s financial chief plans to issue the first official stablecoin licenses in early 2026, following rules that demand strict reserve, redemption and risk management standards.

Sponsored

Within that context, the host points to Ripple’s CBDC platform, built on the XRP Ledger, which has been used in the HKMA’s e-HKD pilot program. Banks like Fubon are testing tokenized real estate and settlement using a hypothetical e-HKD on this infrastructure.

The video cites recent analysis describing Ripple’s CBDC stack as a “regulatory grade liquidity layer” capable of handling both CBDCs and stablecoins.

Surely, the host is careful to say this does not mean XRP itself becomes a CBDC or is mandated, but argues that if banks choose XRP within this ecosystem for tokenization, custody or interoperability, that could drive transaction volume and network effects across the ledger.

Africa, Stablecoins & What’s The True Cost Of Moving MoneyFrom Davos, economist Vera Songwe is quoted on remittances in Africa, where fees can reach about 6% per transaction and cross-border transfers can take days. She contrasts that with stablecoin transfers that “take minutes and cost about a dollar.”

The host connects this to Ripple’s RLUSD product and mentions an executive, “Reese Meric,” leading Middle East and Africa expansion, arguing that XRP, XLM and HBAR are well placed to underpin low-cost remittances and tokenized savings in inflation-hit economies.

The analyst speculates RLUSD could grow from roughly $1.4 billion in its initial year to $5–10 billion in volume by year-end, though this is framed explicitly as personal speculation.

Tokenization Meets Institutions In CZ’s 2026 ‘Super-Cycle’Clips from the World Economic Forum feature BlackRock’s Larry Fink calling tokenization and “decimalization” necessary, saying a unified blockchain for tokenized money market funds, bonds and equities could reduce fees and corruption.

Then, Crypto Sensei underscores this with an example from Franklin Templeton’s tokenized money market fund on Stellar: 50,000 transactions that would traditionally cost about $75,000 reportedly cost just $1.50 on-chain.

On exchanges and market cycles, CZ is shown saying exchanges and stablecoins are currently the only “proven” crypto businesses, while tokenization, payments and AI-native crypto use are next. He suggests 2026 may be a “super cycle” year for Bitcoin, potentially breaking the traditional four-year pattern, citing friendlier US policy and global follow-through.

Institutional adoption appears to be moving in parallel.

The analyst highlights Turkey’s second-largest private bank, Garanti BBVA’s crypto arm, extending its custody partnership with Ripple for XRP, BTC, ETH and other assets. Crypto Sensei frames the renewal as validation that Ripple’s institutional custody tech works at tier-one scale and can be shown to other banks as a reference deal.

The broader message: as regulators codify stablecoin and CBDC regimes, and as major funds and banks actually run tokenized products on public chains, the choice of underlying ledgers and liquidity assets may matter more than spot price swings in the near term.

People Also Ask:Does Hong Kong’s stablecoin plan guarantee XRP usage?

No. The video stresses that Ripple’s platform can support CBDCs and stablecoins, but XRP is not guaranteed or mandated as the CBDC itself.

Is RLUSD already at $5–10 billion?

Not yet. The YouTube analyst speculates it could reach that range by year-end based on early volumes and expected institutional growth.

What did CZ mean by a 2026 “super-cycle”?

He suggested that by 2026, Bitcoin might outperform its usual four-year cycle, helped by pro-crypto US policy and global adoption, but he did not give a specific price target.

Are traditional banks already using Ripple for custody?

According to Crypto Sensei, Garanti BBVA’s crypto unit in Turkey has renewed its use of Ripple’s institutional custody technology for multiple digital assets, signaling real-world banking integration.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

0% Neutral

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

21h05 ▪ 4 min read ▪ by Luc Jose A.

Summarize this article with:

GameStop moved all its treasury in bitcoin, that is 4,710 BTC valued at over 422 million dollars, to Coinbase Prime. This massive transfer, spotted by CryptoQuant, could signal an imminent sale. For a company that became a symbol of finance for individuals since the Reddit saga, this strategic shift is surprising. Indeed, GameStop had until now displayed a firm position on bitcoin, inherited from its dealings with Michael Saylor. Should this be seen as a discreet disavowal of the crypto bet?

In brief GameStop transferred all its 4,710 BTC, valued at 422 million dollars, to the institutional platform Coinbase Prime. The movement was detected by CryptoQuant, which sees a possible signal of sale by the company. This transfer could result in a loss of 76 million dollars, considering the average purchase price of 107,900 $ per BTC. This decision could mark a strategic repositioning of the company, at a time when the appeal of crypto treasuries is fading. A discreet exit for a wavering strategy GameStop transferred all its treasury in bitcoin, that is 4,710 BTC, valued at over 422 million dollars, to Coinbase Prime, the institutional platform of the exchange, while the company’s stock had dropped because of the fall of the crypto queen.

The information was revealed by CryptoQuant, which spotted this on-chain movement and immediately raised the possibility of an imminent sale. The analytics company posted a message on X stating : “Is GameStop throwing in the towel ?”, specifying that the operation was “probably intended for sale”.

The following data provide an accurate picture of this maneuver :

The transferred amount : 4,710 BTC sent in a single operation to Coinbase Prime ; The estimated value : over 422 million dollars at the time of transfer ; The average purchase price : 107,900 dollars per BTC, acquired in May 2025 ; The price at the time of transfer : around 90,800 dollars per BTC ; The potential loss : around 76 million dollars if all is sold at this price. GameStop’s entry into the bitcoin world was initiated after a meeting between Ryan Cohen and Michael Saylor. The decision to build a Bitcoin treasury was then part of an institutional dynamic observed in 2024-2025. This transfer, which has not yet been officially commented on, could mark a major strategic turning point.

Stock buybacks : strategic caution or assumed disengagement? This massive transfer to Coinbase comes just days after Ryan Cohen bought back 500,000 GME shares, for an amount exceeding 10 million dollars, according to a regulatory filing published Wednesday.

This operation immediately had a positive effect on GameStop’s stock price, which rose more than 3% the following Thursday. This CEO’s renewed confidence in the company’s shares could be interpreted as a will to refocus financial resources on the core business, to the detriment of crypto exposure.

In a context where many listed companies that adopted crypto strategies in 2024 and 2025 now see their stock performances degrade, GameStop’s choice could fit into a general trend of partial disengagement of treasuries from digital assets. Thus, more than 190 listed companies still hold bitcoin in their balance sheets, but this strategy has lost its appeal as the market stabilizes and profitability is questioned.

GameStop’s silence fuels speculation about a possible bitcoin disengagement. This massive transfer occurs while the bitcoin price remains volatile, increasing uncertainties. In a context of strategic repositioning for many companies, GameStop’s next moves will be closely watched by the crypto market.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Luc Jose A.

Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019. Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

Tokenized US Treasuries crossed $10 billion in total value this week, a milestone that confirms the category has moved from proof-of-concept to operational infrastructure.

Yet, something happening underneath this achievement is just as important: Circle's USYC has edged past BlackRock's BUIDL as the largest tokenized Treasury product, signaling that distribution rails and collateral mechanics now matter more than brand recognition in determining which on-chain cash equivalents win.

As of Jan. 22, USYC holds $1.69 billion in assets under management compared to BUIDL's $1.684 billion, a gap of roughly $6.14 million, or 0.36%.

Over the past 30 days, USYC's assets grew 11% while BUIDL's contracted 2.85%, a divergence that reads less like marketing success and more like net creation flowing in one direction while redemptions drain the other.

This isn't a story about Circle beating BlackRock in a brand war. It's about collateral workflow design outperforming logo recognition.

Additionally, it maps directly onto the infrastructure question that regulators and institutions are now asking out loud: who shapes the stack that turns idle crypto capital into productive, yield-bearing collateral?

Distribution plus collateralization beats brandUSYC's clearest structural advantage is distribution through exchange collateral rails.

On July 24, Binance announced that institutional customers could hold USYC and use it as off-exchange collateral for derivatives, with custody handled through Banking Triparty or Ceffu and near-instant redemption into USDC.

Binance added BUIDL to its off-exchange collateral list on Nov. 14, four months after USYC.

That sequencing matters. If the cash collateral stack is built first inside prime brokerage and derivatives workflows, the product that integrates earlier captures the flow.

USYC didn't just get listed, it got embedded into the operational layer where institutions manage margin and collateral automation.

Circle positioned USYC explicitly as yield-bearing collateral that travels alongside USDC rails, meaning institutions that already route stablecoin flows through Circle's ecosystem can onboard USYC without building new operational pathways.

BlackRock's BUIDL entered the market with brand authority but without the same plug-and-play integration into crypto-native collateral systems.

Circle's USYC (blue) overtook BlackRock's BUIDL (orange) in total value on Jan. 21, 2026, after steady growth from below $500 million since mid-2025.Product mechanics suit trading collateralRWA.xyz labels the two products differently under “Use of Income.” USYC is marked as “Accumulates,” meaning interest accrues within the token balance. BUIDL is marked as “Distributes,” meaning returns are paid out separately.

This distinction is mechanical, not cosmetic. Collateral systems, especially automated margin and derivatives infrastructure, prefer set-and-forget balances where value compounds without requiring operational handling of payouts.

An accumulating structure integrates more cleanly into collateral automation than a distributing one.

For institutions building collateral rails that need to scale across multiple venues and counterparties, the simpler the structure, the lower the operational drag.

RWA.xyz lists materially different entry requirements for the two products.

BUIDL restricts access to US Qualified Purchasers, requiring a minimum investment of $5 million in USDC. USYC targets non-US investors with a minimum of $100,000 USDC.

The funnel difference is structural. Qualified Purchaser status in the US requires $5 million in investable assets for individuals or $25 million for entities, a narrow gate that excludes most crypto-native funds, prop desks, and smaller institutional players.

USYC's $100,000 minimum and non-US eligibility open access to a broader set of offshore institutions, family offices, and trading firms that operate outside US regulatory perimeters but still need dollar-denominated, yield-bearing collateral.

BlackRock's brand carries weight, but the brand doesn't override access constraints. If a fund can't meet the Qualified Purchaser threshold or operates outside the US, BUIDL isn't an option. USYC is.

The addressable market for on-chain collateral skews heavily toward non-US entities and smaller institutions, exactly the segment USYC is designed to serve.

Net creation versus net redemptionThe simplest explanation for the flip is the cleanest: flows moved.

USYC grew by 11% over the past 30 days, while BUIDL shrank by 2.85%. That's not a marketing differential. It's net issuance into one product, offset by net outflows from the other.

The recent flip suggests a discrete event or allocation decision rather than gradual drift. USYC's Binance integration, its accumulating income structure, and its lower entry threshold all reduce friction. BUIDL hasn't added comparable distribution momentum in the same window.

Tokenized Treasuries at $10 billion remain a small fraction of the $310 billion stablecoin market, but their role is shifting from niche experiment to operational default.

Tokenized U.S. Treasuries grew from under $1 billion in early 2024 to over $10 billion by January 2026, with Circle USYC and BlackRock BUIDL dominating the market.The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) noted in recent guidance that tokenized money market funds are increasingly used as stablecoin reserve assets and as collateral for crypto-related transactions. This is precisely the interlinkages driving USYC's growth.

JPMorgan framed tokenized money market funds as the next frontier after stablecoins, centered on portability and collateral efficiency.

The bank's analysis treats tokenized Treasuries not as an alternative to stablecoins but as an evolution of them. They are programmable cash equivalents that settle faster, move across blockchains more easily, and integrate into collateral systems with less operational overhead than traditional custody arrangements.

With stablecoin yields near zero, tokenized Treasuries offer a risk-free on-chain rate without requiring users to exit crypto rails.

Instead of parking cash in non-yielding stablecoins or moving it off-chain to earn returns, institutions can now hold yield-bearing collateral on-chain that functions like cash but compounds like Treasuries.

What happens nextThe $10 billion milestone is less important than the capture rate it represents.

Tokenized Treasuries currently account for roughly 3% to 4% of the stablecoin float. If that rate doubles over the next 12 months, which is a conservative assumption given current flow momentum and collateral integrations, tokenized Treasuries could reach $20 billion to $25 billion.

If collateral flywheels accelerate and more venues replicate Binance-style off-exchange rails, the range stretches to $40 billion to $60 billion.

The metrics that matter are all measurable: net issuance trends, collateral integration announcements, changes to eligibility requirements, and shifts in income-handling preferences.

USYC's 30-day growth rate and BUIDL's contraction are early signals. The Binance integration timeline is another. The funnel gap is a third.

USYC didn't flip BUIDL because Circle outspent BlackRock on marketing. It flipped because distribution, mechanics, and access constraints aligned with how institutions actually use on-chain collateral.

The category crossed $10 billion not because one flagship product dominated, but because multiple products are now competing on infrastructure terms: who integrates faster, who reduces friction, who widens the funnel.

Brand recognition opened doors. Collateral workflow design is keeping them open.

Mentioned in this article

Journalist

Posted: January 26, 2026

The Polygon [POL] network saw a surge in onchain activity in the second week of January.

AMBCrypto reported that the record POL burn was due to “an all-time high for demand and single-day fees generated”.

The onchain metrics showed that short-term holders back then were in profit, and given the higher timeframe price trend of POL, this represented a threat from profit-taking pressure.

The $0.18-$0.20 area was highlighted as a potential supply zone. This has come to pass. At the time of writing, the Polygon token was trading at $0.1245, down 33.28% from the $0.1866 high it made on the 10th of January.

Decreased onchain activity reveals reduced POL demand The daily Active Addresses metric saw a sharp spike in the second week of January, around the same time as POL’s price rally. Since then, the Active Address count has steadily declined.

Moreover, the Network Growth has also fallen over the past two weeks. The transaction count has also declined, coming back to December’s levels.

The developments of the past two weeks meant that the surge in onchain activity has not been sustainable. This could help explain the reduced demand for POL.

Holder behavior shows mixed signals The Mean Coin Age and the 90-day Dormant Circulation moved dramatically during the POL rally earlier this month. This suggested short-term holders had taken profits during the bounce.

However, the 1-year Dormant Circulation hardly moved, showing long-term holder conviction remained steady. Since the 14th of January, the Mean Coin Age has begun to trend upward, once more signaling network-wide accumulation.

Capitulation from short-term holders was not seen either, as the 90-day Dormant Circulation remained quiet after the initial spike.

Traders and investors can keep an eye on the Dormant Circulation in the coming weeks to monitor the next wave of selling.

Overall, the slowing onchain activity was a concern. Another uptick in activity and demand for POL can drive the next rally. For now, traders and investors can keep an eye on the $0.12 support level.

Final Thoughts The early January Polygon price and onchain activity surge were not sustained in subsequent weeks. Long-dormant tokens woke up during the recent rally, a sign of holders selling the bounce.

Akashnath S is a Senior Journalist and Technical Analysis expert at AMBCrypto. He specializes in dissecting price action, identifying key market trends through advanced chart patterns, and forecasting both short-term and long-term asset trajectories. His distinct analytical method is grounded in his academic training as a Chemical Engineer. This background provides him with a systematic, process-oriented approach to market data, enabling him to analyze the complex dynamics of financial markets with precision and objectivity. Having actively covered the cryptocurrency space since the landmark 2017 market cycle, Akashnath possesses years of experience navigating both bull and bear markets. This seasoned perspective is critical to his insightful reporting on market volatility and evolution. As an active market participant, Akashnath enhances his analysis with crucial, hands-on experience. This practical application of his technical skills ensures his insights are not merely theoretical, but are also relevant and actionable for an audience looking to understand and navigate trading opportunities. He is dedicated to educating readers on the nuances of technical analysis, empowering them with the knowledge to make more informed financial decisions.

3 mins mins

Key Points:

Main event involves UK civil recovery of 60,000 BTC from a major fraud case.Civil recovery faces agent representation challenges.Judiciary aims to streamline victim representation processes. The UK High Court has commenced civil recovery proceedings for a 60,000 BTC money laundering case involving Zhao Dong, following the January 25th hearing, amid concerns over Chinese victim representation.

These proceedings could impact global cryptocurrency regulations and influence future legal standards in international money laundering cases involving digital assets.

UK Seizes 60,000 BTC in Record Legal Maneuver The ongoing case could influence bankruptcy proceedings due to the substantial assets involved. This is noted as the largest Bitcoin seizure in UK history, reflecting the growing legal intricacies involved in cross-border cryptocurrency cases. The Metropolitan Police have highlighted the historical scale of the operation, using advanced cryptocurrency tracing methods.

Adrian Foster of the CPS confirmed the financial aspect of the case, stating, “The CPS and Metropolitan Police have successfully executed a confiscation order against Seng Hok Ling, demanding a £5.6 million payment.” This statement underscores the financial and criminal dimensions of the operation, emphasizing the complexity of executing international asset recovery.

“The CPS and the Metropolitan Police have successfully brought Seng Hok Ling to justice. Ling took part in a sophisticated money laundering operation which laundered many millions of pounds from the proceeds of crime. We have today secured a Confiscation Order against him of over £5 million, which he must pay within 3 months or risk being returned to prison for an additional sentence of eight years.” — Adrian Foster, CPS News UK’s Largest BTC Seizure Sparks Regulatory Talks Did you know? The UK’s largest cryptocurrency seizure involves Bitcoin, emphasizing the scale of past operations lacking both regulatory and technological facets.

Bitcoin (BTC) recently recorded a market value of $86,811 amidst a volatile period. With a market cap of $1.73 trillion, its dominance remains at 59.39%. Exhibiting a 2.64% dip in the past 24 hours, Bitcoin’s trading volume surged 96.58% to $30.83 billion, as per CoinMarketCap.

Bitcoin(BTC), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 21:08 UTC on January 25, 2026. Source: CoinMarketCap According to the Coincu research team, the intricate legal proceedings in the UK’s largest BTC seizure may prompt future regulatory adjustments in financial oversight. Using data analysis, analysts suggest enhanced tracking protocols and monitoring could form pivotal elements in reducing illicit activities in cryptocurrency landscapes.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

Journalist

Posted: January 26, 2026

PIPPIN price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month. The memecoin underperformed the crypto market, which was nearly flat over the past few weeks.

Technically, the memecoin is undergoing a deeper correction, which is evident on the charts and in the chain activity.

Smart money offloading PIPPIN  As per StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours. The smart money offloaded more than $675K Pippin [PIPPIN] during this period.

This withdrawal of capital from the memecoin resulted in the sell pressure that brought the memecoin down.

Other memes in this category were Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], WHITEWHALE, and PENGUIN. Inclusion of USDC in this list meant that traders were locking in profits or cutting their losses.

Source: StalkChain

Again, the correction was market-wide, specifically for memecoins. This is because traders were moving from the high-risk tokens like memes to more stable assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

PIPPIN price remains choppy While the smart money is bearish with their actions, the PIPPIN price has been choppy since reaching a peak around $0.70. The memecoin had broken below the ascending trendline, which indicated the price was trading in a bearish structure.

Even the small pumps that were happening between mid-December and now were insignificant, as the price could not break past this consolidation.

The Choppiness Index (CHOP), which was at 49, showed that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50. This is after peaking around 60, which meant that the price had no clear direction yet.

Source: TradingView

Furthermore, the seller’s momentum was contributing to this decline in the price of PIPPIN. The red bars were gradually increasing in size as the price approached the support level around $0.29.

Historical data showed that every time the PIPPIN price hit the aforementioned support level, it was followed by a bounce back. That suggested it could rise to $0.40 as the first target.

Conversely, a breakdown of the level would accelerate the decline, increasing the losses. However, this was not guaranteed, as bets to the upside were hitting the markets.

Liquidity magnet sitting above price action As per CoinGlass data, traders were now betting on price, activating the orders at the $0.39 level. Positions worth thousands of dollars were clustered between $0.39 and $0.42, price magnets that could pull PIPPIN toward this zone.

Source: CoinGlass

The clusters came after the liquidation of long orders sitting below $0.36. The long squeeze accelerated the breakdown on the charts.

That said, choppiness on the charts, smart money’s selling pressure, capital rotation, and a long squeeze all contributed to the price crash.

Final Thoughts PIPPIN price declined by 13%, extending the monthly losses to 36%.  PIPPIN could bounce back to $0.39, where liquidity clusters were price magnets. 

While BTC plunged below $87,000 on Sunday, prediction markets are flashing mixed but revealing signals for bitcoin as late January betting frames a tug-of-war between short-term caution and longer-term optimism. Kalshi, Polymarket, and Myriad Markets Hint at Rangebound Bitcoin Prediction markets as of Jan.

Prosecutors say the conspirators moved fentanyl analogues, MDMA, methylone, and ketamine, distributing bulk drugs and fake pills.

A Passaic County man has been sentenced to 12 years in federal prison for his role in a large-scale fentanyl distribution and money laundering conspiracy that involved the use of Bitcoin to pay overseas drug suppliers, according to the latest press release shared by the US Department of Justice.

William Panzera, 53, of North Haledon, New Jersey, was sentenced following his conviction for drug trafficking conspiracy and international promotional money laundering conspiracy.

Counterfeit Pills, Real Fentanyl According to court documents and statements made in court, Panzera was a member of a drug trafficking organization responsible for importing and distributing hundreds of kilograms of fentanyl analogues and other controlled substances. Prosecutors said Panzera and his co-conspirators agreed to import and distribute fentanyl analogues, MDMA, methylone, and ketamine.

The drugs were sourced from suppliers in China and were distributed across New Jersey, both in bulk form and as counterfeit pharmaceutical pills that contained fentanyl analogues rather than legitimate medication.

Authorities said the conspiracy resulted in the importation of more than a metric ton of fentanyl-related substances and other drugs into the United States. To pay for the shipments, members of the organization sent hundreds of thousands of dollars to China using a combination of wire transfers and Bitcoin (BTC).

Panzera was convicted at trial in January 2025. The Justice Department stated that eight other defendants connected to the case have previously pleaded guilty.

Fentanyl Trafficking on Dark Web This case comes as part of a broader crackdown on fentanyl trafficking and illicit drug networks coordinated by US and international authorities. In May 2025, the Department of Justice announced the results of Operation RapTor, a large-scale international law enforcement initiative targeting dark web drug markets.

You may also like: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and the Multi-Year Reset Nobody Saw Coming Gold Surges, Bitcoin Tanks Below $88,000 in Biggest Sell-off of 2026 Wintermute Calls End of Four-Year Crypto Cycle, Flags 2026 Triggers The operation led to the arrest of 270 individuals worldwide and the seizure of more than $200 million in cash and digital assets.

According to the DOJ, the effort focused on vendors, buyers, and administrators involved in the online trafficking of opioids, particularly fentanyl, and other narcotics. Operation RapTor was conducted in coordination with law enforcement agencies from 10 countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, South Korea, and Brazil, and was described as the largest takedown in the history of the agency’s Joint Criminal Opioid and Darknet Enforcement (JCODE) team.

Authorities seized more than two metric tons of drugs, including 144 kilograms of fentanyl-laced substances, in addition to over 180 firearms. The investigation relied on intelligence gathered from previously dismantled darknet markets such as Nemesis and Tor2Door. The operation also saw the first use of sanctions by the Office of Foreign Assets Control as part of a JCODE action.

Tags:

Can RAIN Token Hit Another All-Time High This Week?RAIN targets a new ATH above $0.0110 as sellers pause and breakout structure holds.Falling spent coins show sellers waiting, but weakening RSI and MFI warn momentum is fading.A clean $0.0110 breakout opens $0.0128, while loss of $0.0082 risks deeper correction.RAIN price has rallied nearly 40% over the past 30 days, keeping its breakout structure intact. The price is now trading just below $0.0104, but that level is no longer the real focus.

The active breakout structure points to a new projected all-time high above $0.0110, more than 10% higher from current levels. While upside remains open, fading momentum suggests sellers could return right where optimism peaks.

Sponsored

Sponsored

New All-Time High Is the Real Target, and Sellers Are Still WaitingThe active breakout inverse head-and-shoulders structure projects a new all-time high more than 10% above current prices, near the $0.0110 zone. That projected level, not the prior peak, is where traders are positioning. The current consolidation is not about profit-taking at old highs. It is about whether RAIN can expand into its next leg.

RAIN Breakout Structure: TradingViewWant more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

On-chain behavior supports this view. Spent coins age band activity, which tracks how many tokens of all holding ages are being moved on-chain and often reflects selling or profit-taking, has collapsed over the past few days. Since January 22, spent coins activity has fallen from roughly 104.8 million to 25.4 million, a decline of nearly 76% in just three days.

Coin Activity Takes A Hit: SantimentThat sharp drop means holders are not moving tokens despite rising prices, showing positive short-term behavior. This signals restraint, not distribution. Participants appear to be waiting for the projected all-time high attempt before acting. In simple terms, sellers have stepped aside for now, allowing the breakout path toward $0.0110 to remain intact. But this quiet phase is exactly where risks start to build.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Why Sellers Could Return Near the Projected ATHThe first warning comes from the structure forming beneath the original breakout.

As RAIN has continued higher since early January, a secondary inverse head-and-shoulders pattern has started to form. Unlike the earlier breakout structure, this one has a steeply up-sloping neckline and a right shoulder that is larger than the head. That shape makes follow-through harder. The projected upside from this structure is modest, roughly 13–14%, and it requires strong momentum to succeed.

Long-term momentum is not confirming that strength.

Between January 6 and January 22, RAIN’s price printed a higher high, while the Relative Strength Index (RSI) formed a lower high. RSI measures price momentum by comparing recent gains to losses. When price rises, but RSI weakens, it signals fading buying pressure, not strength. This bearish RSI divergence is appearing before the projected ATH is reached, which is a key warning.

New Pattern, Weak Momentum: TradingViewSponsored

Sponsored

The Money Flow Index (MFI) reinforces this concern. MFI tracks buying and selling pressure using both price and volume. Between January 6 and January 24, RAIN’s price moved sideways to slightly higher, but MFI trended lower. That shows dip buying is weakening, even though sellers are still inactive.

Dip Buyers Are Weak: TradingViewThis explains the contradiction on the surface. Spent coins are falling because sellers are waiting. RSI and MFI are weakening because buyers are not stepping in aggressively.

Rallies supported by seller restraint rather than buyer expansion are fragile. If and when the RAIN price finally reaches the projected ATH zone, even moderate profit-taking (sellers returning) can tip the balance.

Sponsored

Sponsored

RAIN Price Levels That Matter NextRAIN can still reach a new all-time high. Nothing in the data blocks that path outright.

A daily close above $0.0110 would confirm expansion beyond the breakout projection and open room toward $0.0128, driven largely by sentiment and momentum continuation.

However, risk builds quickly if the market hesitates near that zone.

If sellers return and spent coins activity spikes near the projected ATH, the first level to watch is $0.0099, where the recent structure begins to weaken. Below that, confidence in the setup fades.

RAIN Price Analysis: TradingViewA breakdown below $0.0082–$0.0081 would invalidate the newer right-shoulder and head structure and open the door toward $0.0068, marking a deeper corrective phase.

Disclaimer

In line with the Trust Project guidelines, this price analysis article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. BeInCrypto is committed to accurate, unbiased reporting, but market conditions are subject to change without notice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Bitcoin faces renewed technical pressure as a veteran trader flags a completed bear channel, warning that downside risk remains dominant unless a critical price level is decisively reclaimed. Peter Brandt Highlights Bearish Bitcoin Structure With $93K Key Invalidation Level Peter Brandt, a veteran trader and chart analyst, shared on social media platform X on Jan.

There's one clear winner.

When it comes to brick-and-mortar retail, Walmart (WMT 0.09%) and Target (TGT +1.50%) have a stronghold in the U.S., serving millions of consumers daily. However, the stocks have been on two different paths lately.

If you're interested in investing in a retail stock and have to choose between the two for the long haul, Walmart stands out as the better choice.

Image source: Getty Images.

Walmart has a few advantages over Target when it comes to long-term success. First, it has always positioned itself as the place to go for value and bargains, helping it cater to lower-income and budget-conscious shoppers. This helps Walmart thrive in both a thriving and a slumping economy.

Target, on the other hand, has positioned itself as a more premium brand, and many of its prices reflect that. If money is tight, consumers have no issue skipping Target and heading to Walmart for deals.

Today's Change

(

-0.09

%) $

-0.10

Current Price

$

117.73

Target also can't compete with Walmart's overall reach. It has over 5,200 U.S. stores, compared to Target's roughly 2,000. Many big cities in the country have Targets, but they're not that common in many parts of rural America. However, you can venture almost anywhere in the country and find a Walmart within a reasonable distance (except New York City).

That footprint gives Walmart a logistical advantage that no other retailer can compete with and it's my pick in this matchup. 

Stefon Walters has positions in Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Target and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Netflix's streaming service for movies and television shows just surpassed a record-high 325 million subscribers.

Many of America's largest companies reported operating results beginning this month for the fourth quarter of 2025, giving investors a valuable update on the state of their businesses. Netflix (NFLX +3.17%) released its results on Jan. 20, noting a record amount of subscribers for its industry-leading streaming service and impressive growth in its still-developing advertising business.

Despite Netflix's reported success, the stock price is down 36% from its mid-2025 peak. Investors are weighing the value of its maturing business and are considering the potential impacts of the recently announced plans to spend $82 billion to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

The stock is still up 78,000% since going public in 2002, and the current business appears to be doing well, so the recent dip might be a mere speed bump ahead of further gains in the future. Opportunities for long-term investors to buy this stock at such a steep discount don't come around often, so should investors make a move?

Image source: Netflix.

Netflix isn't resting on its success The streamer ended 2025 with over 325 million paying subscribers, so it continues to tower over its main competitors, Amazon Prime and Disney's Disney+, which have 200 million and 131.6 million members, respectively. But staying ahead of the pack requires constant innovation, which involves testing new pricing structures that appeal to people of all income levels.

In 2022, Netflix launched a low-cost subscription tier supplemented by advertising. It is priced at $7.99 per month, which is much cheaper than the Standard ($17.99 per month) and Premium ($24.99 per month) tiers.

But each ad-tier member becomes more valuable over time, because Netflix can charge businesses more money for advertising slots as the subscriber base grows. The company can also charge more for ad slots when showing premium content, which is why it's leaning heavily into live sports, from boxing to the National Football League.

Netflix's advertising business has incredible momentum right now. Its revenue doubled year over year in 2024, and then more than doubled again to $1.5 billion in 2025. It represented a mere fraction of the company's total revenue of $45.2 billion, but it won't take long for the ad business to become far more significant if it continues growing at this pace.

Today's Change

(

3.17

%) $

2.65

Current Price

$

86.19

In December, Netflix announced plans to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns the rights to blockbuster movie franchises like Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings, in addition to smash-hit TV shows like The Sopranos, Friends, The Big Bang Theory, and Game of Thrones. Warner also owns the DC Entertainment universe, which includes the rights to Batman and Superman movies, and more. These assets could give Netflix's ad business another major boost.

Although it would be a fantastic deal, regulators will have real concerns about its impact on the competitive landscape. Warner is the world's fourth-largest provider of streaming services, so there will be questions about whether the deal will make Netflix far too dominant. It's possible no other streaming service will ever be able to match its scale if this acquisition is approved, so there is no guarantee it actually goes ahead.

Netflix stock is trading at an attractive level The company generated earnings of $2.53 per share in 2025, placing its stock at a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 33. That is roughly in line with the P/E of the Nasdaq-100, which is currently 32.6, so you could argue Netflix is fairly valued relative to its peers in the technology space.

But looking ahead, Wall Street's consensus estimate (provided by Yahoo! Finance) suggests Netflix's earnings could grow to $3.12 per share in 2026, placing its stock at a forward P/E of just 26.6.

Data by YCharts.

That means Netflix stock would have to climb by 24% by the end of this year just to maintain its current P/E of 33, so there is a strong potential return on the table for investors. There will be some volatility along the way as Wall Street learns whether or not the Warner Bros. deal is allowed to proceed, but even if it gets struck down, Netflix still has a very bright future.

Management expects the advertising business to roughly double in size yet again this year, and the company continues to outspend its peers to create and license content, ensuring its platform remains the most attractive destination for new potential subscribers. As a result, I think the recent 36% decline in Netflix stock could be a great buying opportunity.

Taiwan Semiconductor is spending big to fulfill chip demand.

The questions on everyone's mind in the artificial intelligence (AI) investing sector are along the lines of: Is AI demand real, and is there a bubble forming? This is a very important question, because many companies are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into this technology. Most of the AI hyperscalers would say that they haven't brought enough computing capacity online to do what they want. So, spending looks set to continue.

One company is at the center of all of this spending: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM +2.21%). TSMC, as it's also known, holds a massive market share in the logic chip market, and without it, AI computing wouldn't look the same. If TSMC weren't on board with the buildout, it wouldn't be increasing production capacity to meet demand. However, it just gave investors 56 billion reasons why AI demand.

I think investors should consider scooping up the stock as a result.

Image source: Getty Images.

Taiwan Semiconductor's CEO is nervous about AI demand Just because TSMC is excited about artificial intelligence chip demand doesn't mean it's not also cautious. During its fourth-quarter conference call, CEO C.C. Wei stated that he's "very nervous" about AI demand.

That doesn't seem like a great stance to take when you're the CEO of the primary chip manufacturer for AI, but Wei followed that up with a caveat. He went on to say that TSMC is about to invest up to $56 billion in capital expenditures to meet that demand. So, his nervousness comes from the stance of having to spend a ton of money to meet the demand.

This is healthy skepticism, but he's done due diligence with his primary clients over the past few months to understand if the long-term demand is there, and he concluded that it was. This makes a pretty clear case that AI demand is here to stay, and until generative AI capabilities are fully maxed out, Taiwan Semiconductor will continue to be at the center of the movement.

Today's Change

(

2.21

%) $

7.24

Current Price

$

334.61

Taiwan Semi's stock still trades at a discount to big tech Although Taiwan Semiconductor's stock has been on a phenomenal run since the AI race started in 2023 (it's up over 300% since then), I think it's just getting started.

Most big tech companies trade for about 30 times forward earnings in today's market environment. Additionally, these companies are growing their revenue at about a mid-teens rate. Taiwan Semiconductor is both cheaper and growing faster, potentially making it a stronger investment. During its last quarter, its revenue rose 26% year over year, and it trades for 25 times forward earnings.

TSM PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts.

That's really not that much more expensive than the broader market, which trades for 22.3 times forward earnings, as measured by the S&P 500. Furthermore, that growth rate is expected to accelerate throughout the year.

Taiwan Semiconductor's guidance for 2026 was nearly 30% revenue growth, further contributing to a sustained 25% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) that it expects to deliver through 2029. The AI buildout has clearly benefited TSMC, and with its chips being the best options on the market, it will continue to thrive regardless of which company is providing the best AI computing hardware.

The biggest factor for Taiwan Semiconductor is for the AI hyperscalers to continue spending on data centers. As long as this continues, demand will stay elevated, and TSMC will continue to be a market leader. Many projections expect data center buildouts to grow through at least 2030, so there are still several years of growth left for the stock.

I think the risk of an AI bubble forming at this point is fairly minimal. While investors always need to stay diligent, I think Taiwan Semiconductor is among the best investments you can make right now.

By PYMNTS  |  January 25, 2026

 | 

Delivery companies have reportedly lost their bid to halt New York City’s new tipping law.

Uber and DoorDash had asked a judge for an injunction to block the new law, which requires food delivery apps to offer customers the option to tip delivery workers, Reuters reported Friday (Jan. 23).

According to the report, U.S. District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan said the companies did not demonstrate a clear likelihood of succeeding on their claims that the laws, including a requirement that they recommend a minimum tip of 10%, violated their First Amendment rights to free speech.

DoorDash and Uber sued to block the law last month. It requires platforms such as theirs to ask customers to tip during checkout rather than delivery and to display suggested tip amounts.

“A reminder to tip is a courtesy, a forced solicitation of a tip may as well be a tax,” DoorDash wrote in a blog post announcing the litigation.

The company argued that tipping remains voluntary under the law, but that the requirement to ask for it at checkout amounts to “pressure” on customers.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

A separate report by the website Gothamist noted that the new law is due to go into effect Monday (Jan. 26). The report added that city regulators recently alleged that Uber and DoorDash had cost delivery workers more than $550 million after altering their apps’ interfaces in order to dissuade customers from tipping.

A DoorDash spokesperson told the publication that the company would “likely see an immediate drop-off in orders for New York’s small businesses” when the legislation goes into effect.

“We’re disappointed in this ruling, but are confident in our position and will continue working to prevent further losses for local businesses and higher costs for consumers,” DoorDash spokesperson Samantha Ramirez said.

The new law is happening amid ongoing unease among members of the Labor Economy, which PYMNTS has defined as the “roughly 60 million U.S. employees who earn about $25 an hour or less and form the on-the-ground workforce that keeps production, distribution and service delivery running.”

Recent PYMNTS Intelligence research finds that Labor Economy sentiment has remained stuck even when the economy appears better on paper. The research also shows a continued gap in confidence relative to non-Labor Economy workers, fueled by weaker views on saving, debt and job mobility.

“Flat pay expectations and rising expenses are shaping spending behavior in 2026,” the report continued. “Roughly half of Labor Economy workers expect income to stay the same, while nearly half expect monthly expenses to rise, forcing tradeoffs that can shift consumption and payment patterns.”

You can still get Rocket Lab's returns, but with the added bonus of diversification.

One of the top-performing names in the stock market in the last two years has been Rocket Lab (RKLB +1.05%). The company, which provides launch services, rockets, space vehicles, and satellite equipment, is an emerging force in U.S. and international space programs. Rocket Lab stock jumped 360% in 2024 and 174% in 2025. A $10,000 investment three short years ago would have turned into $186,880 today -- that's life-changing money for many people.

Rocket Lab is a great name for anyone who is looking to invest in a space stock. But as much as I like Rocket Lab stock, I think a better buy today is the Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF (JEDI +0.92%). This fund has Rocket Lab as a top holding, and it also provides exposure to several other interesting companies in related industries.

Image source: Getty Images.

What is the JEDI ETF? The Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF, is operated by Defiance ETFs, which focuses on thematic exchange-traded funds. ETFs come in all sorts of flavors and colors -- some are index funds that track the S&P 500 or one of its sectors, and others are thematic ETFs that track an industry or concept. The JEDI ETF falls in the latter category.

The JEDI ETF includes companies that develop military drones, AI-driven warfare and defense technology, space products (including space weaponry), military robotics, and military cybersecurity. The stocks in the ETF receive at least 50% of their revenue from those sources.

Of note, no stock can have more than a 10% weighting of the entire index. That prevents any single name from getting too much exposure in the ETF. As of this writing, the JEDI ETF held 26 stocks, with Rocket Lab being the top holding. The top 10 stocks in the fund account for 64% of the ETF's weight.

Rank/Company

ETF Weight

One-Year Performance

1. Rocket Lab

8.66%

180.8%

2. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions

7.29%

242.4%

3. L3harris Technologies

6.83%

56.1%

4. RTX

6.73%

57.1%

5. Saab AB

6.45%

282%

6. Thales SA

6.06%

94.7%

7. Palantir Technologies

5.79%

126.3%

8. Elbit Systems

5.78%

131.8%

9. AeroVironment

5.53%

80.1%

10. Leidos

5.39%

20.1%

Data source: Defiance ETFs

Rocket Lab is in excellent company. And yet, it's not even the top-performing name in the JEDI ETF over the last 12 months. That distinction goes to Saab AB, a Swedish defense company that makes fighter jets and provides cybersecurity solutions for the military, among other products. Kratos Defense is also an interesting company that has outperformed Rocket Lab -- it makes high-performance drones and satellite communications for space-based applications.

NYSEMKT: JEDIETF Series Solutions - Defiance Drone And Modern Warfare ETF

Today's Change

(

0.92

%) $

0.27

Current Price

$

29.48

Palantir may be the best-known name among the company's top holdings. The data analytics company makes powerful software that can tap into satellite data and hundreds of data points worldwide to provide military and intelligence clients with real-time data and insights. The company's Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) and Foundry platform for commercial clients are also quickly growing in popularity.

How does Rocket Lab fit in the JEDI ETF? Granted, some companies in the JEDI ETF have a much stronger military focus. Rocket Lab made 21 successful launches in 2025, and its customers include the U.S. Space Force, BlackSky Technology, Japan's national space agency, and others -- some of which are undisclosed.

Rocket Lab is also involved in NASA's Escapade mission to Mars, which launched Nov. 13 -- it supplied the spacecraft being transported by Blue Origin rockets to study the impact of solar wind on Mars' atmosphere.

But it has plenty of military work as well, including an $816 million contract awarded in December by the U.S. Space Development Agency to build missile-tracking satellites. It also has a $515 million contract to build a satellite communications network to send data to the U.S. military. Rocket Lab is also expected to bid on the Department of Defense's Golden Dome project, which would use ground-based and space-based missiles to intercept missiles.

Today's Change

(

1.05

%) $

0.92

Current Price

$

88.90

President Donald Trump has said he wants to push the U.S. defense budget from $900 billion in 2026 to $1.5 trillion in 2027. Such spending is helping to fuel the massive profits in Rocket Lab and other stocks in the JEDI ETF.

While I'm always interested in high-flying stocks with great growth stories, I believe it's a much better idea to invest in ETFs that accomplish the same goal while providing instant diversification. The Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF, launched in September 2025, is an ideal vehicle for investors who like Rocket Lab. While the ETF's expense ratio is a rather high 0.69%, or $69 per $10,000 invested annually, the fund is priced reasonably and the return compensates well in proportion to the fee.

Patrick Sanders has positions in Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AeroVironment, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, L3Harris Technologies, Leidos, Palantir Technologies, RTX, Rocket Lab, and Saab Ab (publ). The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.