Goldman Sachs se stal největším institucionálním držitelem spotových XRP ETF s expozicí 87,4 milionu USD. Bloomberg Intelligence zároveň uvádí kumulativní čisté přílivy do XRP ETF na 1,8 miliardy USD.
Goldman Sachs has taken the top spot among institutional holders of spot XRP ETFs, according to Q2 13F filings compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. The bank’s exposure jumped to $87.4 million, up $83.1 million from the prior quarter, by far the largest increase of any firm on the list.
Who Else Made the List
Jane Street Group sits in second place with $16.6 million in exposure, followed closely by Millennium Management at $16.2 million. Rounding out the top five are Intesa Sanpaolo, the European banking giant, at $14.4 million, and Marex UK Holdings at $8.1 million.
Most firms on the Bloomberg Intelligence list added to their XRP positions this quarter. A handful moved the other way, Citadel Advisors, Gallacher Capital Management, SIG Holding and Flow Traders US all trimmed their exposure, with SIG posting the steepest cut at roughly $4.6 million.
$1.8 Billion and Counting
Zoom out from individual holders and the flow data tells an even bigger story. Bloomberg’s James Seyffart revealed that XRP ETF flows have been “surprisingly resilient,” with cumulative net inflows now sitting at $1.8 billion since launch. According to data, that total climbed from $150 million just after launch in November 2025 to $1.45 billion by mid-January, then went higher through the spring before crossing $1.79 billion by late August.
What makes that number stand out, according to analyst CryptoSensei, is that it built up without XRP’s price cooperating. Inflows kept climbing even through stretches where the token wasn’t exactly making life easy for buyers.
Money Keeps Coming Even as Price Pulls Back
That pattern has continued into the latest pullback. XRP has slipped to around $1.37, but spot ETFs have pulled in more than $150 million over nine straight trading days, even as exchange reserves continue to decline, typically a sign that coins are being moved off exchanges and into longer-term holding rather than sold.
XRP holding above $1.36 keeps the door open for a retest of the $1.43 level, where XRP was previously rejected, while losing that floor would put the recent sweep low back in play.
Adding to the Momentum: RLUSD Crosses $2 Billion
Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD also hit a milestone this month, crossing $2 billion in market cap, with more than $1 billion of that issued directly on the XRP Ledger, according to the stablecoin’s latest independent attestation for July. The company added that the token isn’t even two years old yet.
Story Ends Here
Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.
Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.
Rusko od 1. září 2026 omezí retail nákupy kryptoměn jen na Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) a Tether (USDT). Roční limit pro jednotlivce bude 300 000 rublů.
Russia has approved new regulations set to take effect on September 1, 2026, creating a stricter framework for the use of digital assets by both individuals and businesses. The regulations focus on distinguishing between digital assets used for payments and those treated as securities, aiming to limit the accessibility of most altcoins to the general public.
Retail access tightly restrictedUnder the incoming rules, Russian retail investors will be restricted to purchasing only Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Tether (USDT). The annual purchase limit for individuals will be capped at 300,000 rubles, or approximately $3,632. This restriction includes purchases made through brokers, crypto exchanges, and asset managers.
Individuals must also undergo a formal assessment that tests their ability to understand and manage the risks associated with trading digital assets. Those who meet the requirements may qualify for advanced investor status, which would allow access to a broader selection of cryptocurrencies beyond BTC, ETH, and USDT.
Retail investors in Russia face a 300,000 ruble yearly limit on crypto purchases, applying even if funds are transacted via brokers, exchanges, or other intermediaries; only those passing a special evaluation can access a wider range of digital assets.
Rules for businesses and exceptionsFor Russian businesses, the regulations specify that only companies listed in a designated registry will be permitted to conduct transactions involving digital assets. In early August, President Vladimir Putin signed the law codifying these rules, which continue to prohibit the use of cryptocurrencies as a payment method for domestic transactions.
However, select exceptions apply. Digital assets may be used to settle certain foreign trade contracts, and the legalization of income from crypto mining remains in place. The framework also accommodates security settlements and the circulation of digital rights tied to digital assets.
One key area of focus is stablecoins. Sberbank, the largest bank in Russia, has asked authorities to evaluate the potential use of USDT as a settlement layer for select operations, highlighting growing institutional interest in stablecoins for cross-border trade and settlements.
Mini dictionary: Sberbank, Russia’s largest banking institution and a state-owned enterprise, is a major player in the country’s financial sector, providing banking, investment, and payment services for individuals and businesses.
Central Bank prioritizes investor protectionThe Central Bank of Russia emphasized that these measures aim to shield non-qualified investors from the unpredictable volatility associated with cryptocurrency prices. Liquidity remains a primary consideration for asset approval, which is why major tokens such as XRP and Solana (SOL) have not been made widely available to retail investors in the initial phase. The restrictions are intended to prevent retail investors from exposure to assets with low liquidity and greater price swings.
For institutional lenders such as Sberbank, the inability to use USDT for legal settlements could increase risk in the event of borrower defaults. Meanwhile, retail holders of XRP in Russia face similar obstacles, as they must successfully pass the special evaluation procedure before being able to purchase beyond the prescribed limit.
CryptocurrencyRetail Purchase LimitRequires Special EvaluationBitcoin (BTC)300,000 rubles/yearNoEthereum (ETH)300,000 rubles/yearNoTether (USDT)300,000 rubles/yearNoOther cryptocurrenciesBlocked unless advanced statusYesLiquidity and future prospectsOn the Moscow Exchange (MOEX), leveraged XRP trading is available, but daily volumes remain subdued at just a few thousand dollars, reflecting low demand and liquidity. American-developed cryptocurrencies generally see limited participation from Russian investors due to current regulatory preferences.
Looking ahead, proposed amendments in 2027 may increase the number of cryptocurrencies accessible to retail investors, potentially broadening the range of digital assets available for purchase in Russia.
Bitmine nakoupila 53 501 ETH za zhruba 131 milionů USD, což je její největší týdenní nákup od června. Drží už 5 901 112 ETH, tedy 4,9 % nabídky. Bitmine také pokračuje ve stakingu, přičemž 5 067 309 ETH, tedy asi 86 % jejích držeb, má stakovaných přes platformu MAVAN pro odhadovaný roční výnos zhruba 335 milionů USD.
In brief Bitmine bought 53,501 ETH (~$131 million), its largest weekly purchase since June, raising its holdings to 5,901,112 ETH—4.9% of supply and 98% of the way to its "Alchemy of 5%" goal. The buy extends a 65-week streak since the treasury strategy launched in June 2025; total holdings, including cash and other assets, hit $15.6 billion. Bitmine remains the largest ETH treasury and No. 2 crypto treasury behind Strategy, with 86% of its ETH staked via MAVAN for ~$335 million in projected annual revenue. Bitmine Immersion Technologies picked up the pace of its Ethereum buying last week, acquiring 53,501 ETH worth roughly $131 million as chairman Tom Lee touts crypto's strong third quarter.
The NYSE-listed company said Monday its Ethereum stash now stands at 5,901,112 ETH, valued at about $14.8 billion using a reference price of $2,511 per coin. That represents 4.9% of Ethereum's total supply of 120.7 million tokens, leaving Bitmine, in its words, 98% of the way toward its goal of controlling 5% of the network, a target it calls the "Alchemy of 5%."
Myriad: Ethereum next price move? Click to make your prediction.The purchase extends an unbroken run of accumulation. Bitmine has bought Ethereum every week since launching its treasury strategy on June 30, 2025, a streak that now spans 65 weeks even as some recent buys had slowed to smaller sums.
Lee said the top three performing assets since June 30 were Ethereum, Bitcoin and Solana, with Ethereum outpacing the S&P 500 by 5,430 basis points so far this quarter, and he argued that outperformance sets the stage for institutions to add crypto exposure. (Disclosure: Tom Lee is one of several investors in Decrypt’s parent company Dastan.)
Counting cash, other tokens and what it calls "moonshot" investments, Bitmine's total holdings reached $15.6 billion as of Saturday. That includes 211 Bitcoin, $541 million in cash and marketable securities, a $180 million stake in Beast Industries and an $81 million position in Eightco Holdings.
Bitmine remains the world's largest Ethereum treasury and the second-largest crypto treasury overall, trailing only Michael Saylor's Strategy.
Ethereum ETF Net Flows. Image: DecryptThe Bitcoin giant broke its own two-month buying pause this week, snapping up about $370 million in Bitcoin in its first purchase since June. The move followed a rally that flipped Strategy's 840,447 BTC to a roughly $2.8 billion paper profit, after the position had spent much of the summer underwater. Saylor's firm holds around $66 billion in Bitcoin, dwarfing Bitmine's crypto stack.
Bitmine also continues to generate staking income, with 5,067,309 ETH, about 86% of its holdings, staked through its MAVAN platform for projected annualized revenue of roughly $335 million.
Lee pointed to the mid-September Clarity Act vote as one of several potential catalysts heading into year-end.
Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Sberbank odhaduje, že regulovaný obchod s kryptoměnami v Rusku po legalizaci dosáhne v prvním roce 3,5 až 4 bilionů rublů, tedy 46,43 miliardy USD. Do roku 2029 by mohl vyrůst na 7,5 bilionu rublů, neboli 87,06 miliardy USD.
Russia’s regulated cryptocurrency trading volume may reach between 3.5 trillion and 4 trillion rubles, or $46.43 billion, during its first year following legalization, according to Anatoly Popov, Deputy Chairman of Sberbank, one of Russia’s largest state-owned banks.
Regulated trading begins with conservative estimatesPopov presented these figures prior to the Eastern Economic Forum, describing the estimates as conservative. Sberbank relied on data from the Ministry of Finance, which observed that crypto transactions within Russia amount to around 50 billion rubles daily, totaling approximately 18 trillion rubles annually.
SberCIB Investment Research, a division within Sberbank specializing in market analysis, projected that about 20% of this total—equivalent to 3.5 to 4 trillion rubles—could initially transition to regulated platforms once the appropriate legal framework is in place.
Sberbank, referencing Finance Ministry statistics, indicated that only a fraction of Russia’s existing crypto transaction volume is likely to enter the official market soon after new regulations take effect.
Most current crypto trading activity in Russia is expected to remain outside formally regulated exchanges in the near term, given patterns of behavior and the nature of the transition process.
Market growth potential and regulatory timelineSberbank believes that Russia’s regulated crypto market will expand in the coming years as domestic infrastructure matures. Popov stated that annual regulated trading volumes may reach between 4.75 and 5.25 trillion rubles by 2028, rising further to about 7.5 trillion rubles ($87.06 billion) by 2029.
This growth projection signals a gradual migration of crypto activity from unofficial channels toward licensed financial institutions.
YearRegulated Crypto Trading Volume (Trillion Rubles)USD Equivalent (Billion)First year after legalization3.5–4$46.4320284.75–5.25–20297.5$87.06Russia’s legal framework for crypto exchanges is set to take effect on September 1. The law gives professional market participants until July 1, 2027, to obtain the necessary licenses. As a result, full-scale adoption of regulated crypto trading is unlikely until after this transition deadline, keeping the initial volume modest by comparison.
The regulatory structure is designed to encourage a staged rollout, potentially reducing risks for both investors and the wider financial system.
Mini dictionary: Sberbank – Russia’s largest state-owned financial institution, actively involved in digital asset market development, banking, and investment services.
Retail restrictions and asset limitationsPopulation-wide adoption will be influenced by limitations on retail investment. Reports indicate that non-qualified investors are restricted to a maximum investment of 300,000 rubles, approximately $3,800, in crypto per year, provided they complete a financial risk-awareness test. Qualified investors have higher thresholds, but both groups will remain bound by regulatory limits.
Another factor shaping the market’s early phase is the list of approved digital assets. Currently, only Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether’s USDT are sanctioned for trading on Russian-regulated exchanges. Many other cryptocurrencies remain outside the legal perimeter for now.
This may encourage some investors to continue using unlicensed exchanges to access a wider selection of digital assets, limiting the initial share of total crypto activity conducted on regulated platforms.
Access to only Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT through official exchanges could drive demand for alternative assets elsewhere, affecting the pace at which overall activity shifts into regulated channels.
While total crypto activity in Russia could reach 18 trillion rubles per year, Sberbank anticipates that only a modest fraction will move to the regulated sector during the first phase after legalization.
For banks, brokers, and regulated exchanges, the introduction of a legal framework for crypto trading presents significant business opportunities alongside increased state oversight. For investors, the current framework does not equate to unrestricted trading rights.
Future market expansion depends on how licensing procedures evolve, investor demand develops, regulations are updated, and whether authorities choose to broaden the list of approved digital assets. Based on current forecasts, Russia’s regulated crypto market could grow to $87 billion a year by 2029 if these elements progress as expected.
Americké spotové ETF na Ethereum zaznamenaly 5. srpna čistý příliv 60,86 milionu USD. Od spuštění v červenci 2024 už nasbíraly zhruba 12 až 13 miliard USD.
Ethereum’s institutional moment is no longer a theory. US spot Ethereum ETFs recorded net inflows of $60.86 million on August 5, 2026, adding another data point to what has become one of the more compelling demand stories in digital assets this year.
For context, that single-day figure is not the headline number. The headline is what’s underneath it: cumulative net inflows into US spot Ethereum ETFs have now reached somewhere between $12 billion and $13 billion since the products launched in July 2024, with total assets under management estimated between $12 billion and $15 billion.
BlackRock is running away with this market If you want to understand who is winning the Ethereum ETF race, look at BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust, ticker ETHA.
The fund accounts for an estimated 47% to 72% of recent category inflows, with assets under management between $6.5 billion and $8 billion. Fidelity’s FETH, Grayscale’s ETHE and ETH mini trust, Bitwise’s ETHW, and VanEck’s ETHV have all contributed to the overall picture, but the gap between BlackRock and the rest of the field remains wide.
August 2026 turned into something of a breakout month The $60.86 million day on August 5 was actually a relatively quiet moment compared to what followed later in the month.
From August 17 onwards, Ethereum ETFs went on a nine-to-ten day streak of consecutive net buying that totaled over $1.42 billion. Single-day inflow peaks exceeded $225 million during that run, making August 2026 the strongest month for Ethereum ETF inflows since August 2025.
On several trading sessions during August’s inflow streak, the gap between Ethereum ETF inflows and Bitcoin ETF inflows narrowed meaningfully.
What this means for Ethereum’s market structure Crossing $12 billion in cumulative net inflows in roughly 13 months is a milestone worth pausing on. These are not paper numbers or theoretical demand. Net inflows represent actual capital entering the wrapper after accounting for redemptions, meaning real money from real institutional accounts is sitting in these products right now.
There is also a product development dimension here. BlackRock has already filed for a second Ethereum product, ETHB, alongside its existing ETHA. Grayscale, which converted its existing Ethereum trust into a spot ETF, continues to offer both a higher-fee flagship product and a lower-cost mini trust variant.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Cryptex Finance uvádí, že i přes širší rally zůstává kapitál soustředěný hlavně do Bitcoinu a Etherea. Jeho index 36 aktiv za posledních sedm dní vzrostl jen o 1,92 %.
The crypto market has posted sharp gains across Bitcoin and several major altcoins, but Cryptex Finance data covering 36 assets and roughly 92% of the digital asset market shows that capital remains heavily concentrated in Bitcoin and Ethereum despite prices rising across the market.
Summary
Cryptex’s 36-asset index gained just 1.92% over the trailing seven days, even as several major cryptocurrencies posted much larger gains from their recent lows. Joe Sticco said low price dispersion suggests cryptocurrencies are moving together rather than investors rotating capital between assets and sectors. Sticco said roughly nine out of every ten dollars entering regulated crypto products during one recent session went to Bitcoin and Ethereum. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF inflows provide evidence of institutional demand, although Sticco said rising asset values should not be confused with fresh capital entering the funds. Cryptex Finance co-founder Joe Sticco told crypto.news that participation in the recent rally had spread across the market, but the allocation of capital had not followed at the same pace, leaving cryptocurrencies trading more like a single group than a market in which investors are selecting individual winners.
Cryptex’s market index stood at 1,199.69, almost 20% above the base level of 1,000 set on Feb. 20. The index tracks 36 assets across five sectors using Coinbase pricing, giving Sticco a larger sample than Bitcoin or a handful of major altcoins alone.
Over the trailing seven days, however, the index had risen only 1.92%. Sticco said the figure matters because much of the rally that produced large percentage gains from recent lows took place within roughly 72 hours between Aug. 19 and Aug. 21, followed by several days of relatively flat trading.
“Measure from the low, and you get a rally. Measure the trailing week, which is what most readers think they’re being told, and you get almost nothing,” Sticco said.
Bitcoin’s acceleration during that period followed a major derivatives flush alongside renewed spot demand. Earlier market coverage showed BTC jumping from below $65,000 to around $69,500 on Aug. 19 as more than $1 billion in crypto short positions were liquidated within an hour.
Crypto market gains show little separation between assets Price dispersion within Cryptex’s index provides another reason Sticco is reluctant to describe the rally as a full capital rotation.
On the day measured by Cryptex, the strongest constituent gained 6.71%, while the weakest declined 1.49%. Despite covering 36 cryptocurrencies from five sectors, the entire range between the best and worst performers amounted to roughly eight percentage points.
“That is not a market sorting winners from losers. That’s a market moving as one block,” Sticco said.
According to Sticco, such low dispersion indicates that a common market factor is lifting cryptocurrencies together instead of investors moving money between assets based on individual fundamentals.
Major tokens nevertheless produced very different headline returns when measured across the rally. Sticco put Bitcoin’s seven-day increase at roughly 14%, XRP’s at 28%, and Solana’s at about 19%.
Capital allocation did not match the apparent spread in price performance. Bitcoin dominance remained around 57% to 60%, depending on the market universe used, while Sticco cited an Altcoin Season Index reading below 40, far under the 75 level generally used by the index to signal an altcoin season.
Solana also remained more than 50% below its October 2025 level despite gaining about 19% during the week, according to Sticco.
“Participation broadened. Allocation didn’t,” he said.
Institutional flows remain concentrated in Bitcoin and Ethereum Regulated investment products give Sticco another way to separate rising cryptocurrency prices from the destination of new capital.
During one recent Wednesday session, Sticco said U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs received about $232 million, while Ether ETFs attracted roughly $192 million. XRP products brought in around $28 million, compared with approximately $15 million for HYPE products and $9 million for Solana.
By his calculation, close to nine dollars out of every ten went into Bitcoin and Ethereum. Weekly figures showed a similar concentration, with Bitcoin receiving about 71% of flows and Ethereum another 26%.
The concentration comes even as U.S. spot products have helped support Bitcoin’s recovery. A previous report on ETF demand found that U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs had taken in approximately $1.9 billion across five consecutive inflow sessions by Aug. 24, while analysts said continued spot buying would be needed after forced short covering helped accelerate the initial breakout.
Sticco said the subsequent streak had reached eight consecutive sessions of net Bitcoin ETF inflows totaling about $2.8 billion, while Ether ETFs had also recorded eight positive sessions and more than $1 billion in inflows.
August Bitcoin ETF inflows had exceeded $3 billion by the time of his comments, making it the strongest month of 2026, according to Sticco. He said BlackRock had absorbed a large portion of the demand, including around $1.3 billion during the previous week.
“Eight straight sessions of regulated spot creations is not what a short squeeze produces,” he said.
The ETF numbers, however, require another distinction when assessing how much new institutional money has entered Bitcoin.
Sticco said net assets held by the funds had climbed from roughly $77 billion in mid-August to just above $99 billion by Tuesday, an increase of about $22 billion. Actual net inflows during the eight-session streak totaled only around $2.8 billion.
Much of the difference came from Bitcoin’s rising price increasing the value of assets already held by the funds, he said, rather than investors supplying another $22 billion in fresh capital.
Earlier in August, five consecutive inflow sessions had brought approximately $853.5 million into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs between Aug. 3 and Aug. 7, reversing withdrawals recorded during the preceding week.
Sticco also cautioned against viewing August in isolation. He said spot Bitcoin ETFs lost roughly $5.4 billion during the first half of 2026 and remained about $2.5 billion in negative territory for the year despite the latest inflows.
ETF demand is clearer than derivatives positioning Separating institutional buying from leverage requires looking at different parts of the market, according to Sticco.
ETF flows and market depth measure demand, while funding rates, futures basis, and open interest give more information about trader positioning. Sticco said falling open interest alongside rising prices can indicate shorts are closing rather than new buyers entering.
He declined to characterize current open interest as either bullish or bearish because publicly available readings differed. Some datasets quote open interest in Bitcoin while others measure its dollar value, which can produce different trends when BTC itself moves sharply.
Market depth presents a similar problem. Sticco described depth as one of the most useful measures for institutional participation because it shows how much capital can enter or exit without materially moving the market.
“Price tells you what the last trade cleared at. Depth tells you what the next big one will cost.”
Available public depth figures were not current enough for Sticco to say confidently how much liquidity had recovered. He pointed instead to the damage following the October 2025 deleveraging event, when he said an estimated $10 billion to $20 billion in leveraged positions were erased and Bitcoin’s top-of-book depth on major venues fell more than 90% intraday.
Market makers subsequently reduced resting liquidity after getting caught with inventory while hedges were force-closed, according to Sticco, leaving order books at their thinnest since 2022.
For Sticco, the institutional side of crypto has therefore developed faster than the liquidity supporting the underlying market.
U.S. policy and Treasury conditions remain part of the rally Macroeconomic conditions have also played an important role in the latest advance, according to Sticco, who pointed to the U.S. Treasury’s Aug. 19 decision to increase long-dated debt buybacks as an important catalyst.
The Treasury doubled the maximum size of certain long-end liquidity support buybacks from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation. The Treasury announcement was followed by falling long-term yields and an 8.2% Bitcoin advance from an intraday low around $64,100 to approximately $69,500 in less than 12 hours.
Sticco said Bitcoin’s close relationship with software stocks during the move shows how crypto has become more connected to U.S. macro conditions. As interest-rate expectations later changed and short-term yields rose, Bitcoin surrendered some of the gains even though the legislative situation in Washington had not materially changed.
Congress presents another variable for U.S. investors. Sticco pointed to the CLARITY Act, which would establish a statutory division of responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC for parts of the digital asset market and create a federal framework affecting exchanges, brokers, dealers, and custody.
The Senate Banking Committee advanced the legislation 15-9 in May, with Democratic Sens. Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joining Republicans. Sticco, who attended the markup as part of Cryptex’s policy work, said both Democrats made clear at the time that their committee votes did not guarantee support on the Senate floor without progress on unresolved provisions.
A Sept. 15 cloture vote requires 60 votes to move the legislation forward. Previous coverage of the negotiations identified ethics rules, stablecoin rewards, and financial-crime provisions among the issues still unresolved ahead of the procedural vote.
For regulated index products, Sticco pointed in particular to provisions covering CFTC registration of digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers. Capital, asset-segregation, surveillance, and customer-protection requirements could increase the number of regulated venues capable of supporting assets used in exchange-traded products, he said.
Sticco also cited custody provisions and changes affecting financial holding companies as potentially important for institutions, while arguing that statutory classification of digital assets would give index providers more certainty than relying on agency interpretations that future regulators could change.
Policy expectations, however, have weakened even as cryptocurrency prices have risen. Sticco said Polymarket odds for the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 had fallen from roughly 82% in February to around 25% in late August, while Galaxy Research placed the probability closer to 10%.
The Sept. 15 vote will also fall on the first day of the Federal Reserve’s Sept. 15-16 meeting, leaving two major U.S. policy events scheduled within the same period.
Unresolved Senate negotiations include ethics and conflict-of-interest rules involving government officials, possible secondary enforcement authority for state attorneys general, illicit-finance provisions and banking-industry objections to crypto exchanges paying yield on stablecoin balances, according to Sticco.
Charles Hoskinson uvedl, že Cardano kdysi drželo 108 000 BTC z raného crowdsale. Tvrdí, že jeho vazby na Bitcoin komunitu mohou Cardanu pomoci v závodu o Bitcoin DeFi.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson suggested that his longstanding network within the Bitcoin community could give Cardano an advantage in the race to build Bitcoin DeFi.
Speaking recently on The Breakdown podcast, Hoskinson revealed that he was once among the world’s largest Bitcoin holders. He noted that Cardano’s early crowdsale controlled 108,000 Bitcoin. He explained that funds raised in Japanese yen during the crowdsale were converted into Bitcoin, resulting in the massive holding.
At Bitcoin’s price of roughly $250 at the time, the 108,000 BTC would have been worth about $27 million. Hoskinson also recalled discussing the holding with BitGo CEO Mike Belshe, describing the period as a “wild time.”
However, Hoskinson did not clarify whether he or any entity associated with the Cardano project still holds the Bitcoin. Notably, he suggested that his early involvement in Bitcoin helped him build longstanding relationships with major holders across the ecosystem. He believes those connections could become valuable as Cardano seeks to attract Bitcoin liquidity into DeFi.
Cardano Targets Bitcoin’s Idle Liquidity According to Hoskinson, Bitcoin holders could allocate capital to DeFi if Cardano delivers products that offer compelling, reliable yield opportunities.
At the same time, he stressed that Bitcoiners want DeFi solutions that respect Bitcoin’s core principles. These include self-custody, control over assets and properly structured lending, without requiring changes to Bitcoin or forcing users into specific Layer-2 solutions.
That vision aligns with Pogun, an initiative by Input Output Group designed to connect Bitcoin’s idle liquidity to Cardano’s DeFi ecosystem while allowing users to retain custody of their private keys.
Pogun Advances Toward Bitcoin DeFi Pogun’s 2026 roadmap includes a non-margin, oracle-free credit market in Q2, followed by a fixed-term yield DApp in Q3. The initiative is also targeting a BitVM-based, trust-minimized Bitcoin bridge in Q4.
Hoskinson has additionally highlighted major improvements in the technology supporting Cardano’s Bitcoin DeFi strategy. He said the size of a Bitcoin DeFi proof has fallen from 40 GB to 28.1 MB, while validation time has dropped from roughly 354 seconds to 0.149 seconds.
The cost of validating a transaction has also reportedly declined sharply, from around $14,000 to $37.
$1.5B Potential Demand Meanwhile, Pogun CEO Omer Husain recently said the project is already building its loan book ahead of launch. According to Husain, its founding borrowers have indicated $500 million in demand, while regulated institutions on the lending side have expressed interest in providing up to $1 billion.
The reported demand and technological improvements could strengthen Cardano’s efforts to tap Bitcoin’s vast liquidity pool. However, the success of that strategy will ultimately depend on whether Pogun and other Cardano-based Bitcoin DeFi products can deliver the security, custody, and lending standards Bitcoin holders expect.
DisClamier: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author's personal opinions and do not reflect The Crypto Basic opinion. Readers are encouraged to do thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.
Cardano je nově veřejnou ověřovací vrstvou pro firemní dodavatelské řetězce po nasazení Blockforce v Brazílii. Už bylo zaznamenáno přes 500 000 záznamů a náklady na jeden záznam klesly o 92 %.
Cardano is now being used as a public verification layer for enterprise supply chains, after the Cardano Foundation and Blockforce deployed their traceability architecture in production in Brazil. More than 500,000 supply chain records have already been anchored, including data from some of Brazil’s largest fashion groups, according to a Monday statement.
The system uses a permissioned network to store the underlying supply chain information, keeping commercially sensitive records accessible only to participating parties. Cardano receives only the cryptographic proof of each record, enabling independent verification by auditors, regulators or customers without exposing confidential data.
Cost had been a major obstacle to deploying this type of architecture at scale. As reported, engineering work by the Cardano Foundation and Blockforce cut the cost per anchored record by 92%, allowing public verification to move beyond pilot projects and into live enterprise operations.
Among the early users is Azzas 2154, Latin America’s largest fashion group, which uses the platform to build auditable histories for its leather supply chain. The company cross-checks fiscal documents, supplier information and public databases and plans to trace all leather used across its brands by 2030.
The companies have signed contracts covering 6.5 million certified records through 2030. They also plan to extend the model into sectors including automotive, agribusiness, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, positioning Cardano as a public proof layer for supply chains where compliance and provenance need to be independently verified.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Cardano čelí riziku zpoždění upgradu, protože hlasování o Update CC 2026 ještě nedosáhlo potřebného kvóra. DReps jsou na 66,3 % z 67 %, SPOs na 39 % z 51 %.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
The Update Constitutional Committee 2026 governance action is nearing its voting deadline, and participation has not yet reached the threshold needed.
Intersect notes that the governance action expires at 21:44:51 UTC on September 1 and encourages DReps and stake pool operators (SPOs) to vote before the deadline.
A setback in the governance action could affect progress towards the Dijkstra hard fork and Leios upgrade, which will require constitutional as well as technical updates.
HOT Stories
Less than 48 hours leftAccording to Intersect, the Update CC 2026 action will expire on September 1 at 21:44:51 UTC, with less than 48 hours to vote.
Intersect shared the current voting progress; DReps are now very close to the required threshold of 67%, currently at 66.3%. For SPOs, a significant shift in voting participation is still needed within the next 48 hours, with 39% achieved out of the 51% threshold.
48 HOURS TO VOTE: The Update CC 2026 action will expire on Sep 1 at 21:44:51 UTC. ⚠️
Update: DReps are now very close to the required threshold. For SPOs, a significant shift in voting participation is still… pic.twitter.com/M97wLbItLI
— Intersect (@IntersectMBO) August 30, 2026 Intersect highlighted the urgency of SPO participation, as if this action does not pass, existing committee members' terms will expire, and the committee will fall below the required "committeeMinSize" of five.
You Might Also Like
Until the committee returns to at least five members, Treasury Withdrawal, Parameter Update, Constitution Update, and Hard Fork Initiation actions cannot be ratified. This could also hinder progress towards Dijkstra and Leios, which necessitate constitutional and technical updates.
The Dijkstra era delivers Cardano's next major protocol upgrade in two phases. Phase 1 introduces the Dijkstra ledger era and ships Ouroboros Linear Leios as a complete, activated feature, targeting Q4 2026. Phase 2 activates Ouroboros Peras via an intra-era hard fork.
Cardano goes live as public proof layerCardano is now live as the public proof layer in Blockforce's traceability platform. The system runs with Brazil's largest fashion groups and has anchored more than 500,000 supply chain records.
The architecture separates confidentiality from verifiability. Records for each supply chain step sit on a permissioned network, visible only to the parties involved. Only the cryptographic proof of those records is anchored to Cardano, where any auditor, regulator, or customer can confirm a record is genuine without seeing the underlying data.
CEO Tether Paolo Ardoino odmítl preference BIS pro tokenizované bankovní vklady a tvrdí, že plně kryté stablecoiny jsou bezpečnější alternativou než produkty s částečnými rezervami.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has challenged the Bank for International Settlements’ preference for tokenized bank deposits, arguing that fully reserved stablecoins give users a stronger alternative to money held under fractional reserve banking.
Summary
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino challenged the BIS preference for tokenized bank deposits, arguing that fully reserved stablecoins offer users a safer alternative. BIS chief Pablo Hernández de Cos said stablecoins face problems with redeemability, interoperability, financial integrity and monetary sovereignty. Ardoino questioned why savers would keep money in fractional reserve products when stablecoins can hold reserves in liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries. The debate has reached U.S. lawmakers as banking groups warn that stablecoin rewards could pull deposits from banks and reduce funds available for lending. The Bank for International Settlements laid out the case for tokenized deposits on Aug. 28, when General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos told the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium that stablecoins still fall short of several properties needed to function as money at scale. Ardoino responded by questioning why savers would choose bank deposits when stablecoins can hold reserves in highly liquid assets such as U.S. Treasuries.
“BIS is rightfully worried about the fact that stablecoins are exposing the emperor without clothes,” Ardoino said. “Why someone should choose to put his savings into a fractional reserve product while stablecoins are fully reserved?”
Tether CEO challenges the BIS case for tokenized deposits Hernández de Cos argued that stablecoins face problems with redeemability at par, interoperability and financial integrity, while their use outside the United States can create concerns over monetary sovereignty and digital dollarization.
In the BIS model, tokenized deposits remain liabilities of commercial banks and settle through central bank accounts. De Cos said this structure preserves the “singleness” of money because different bank liabilities remain redeemable at par through central bank settlement.
Stablecoins work differently. A user holding USDT who needs to pay someone accepting only USDC may first need to exchange one token for the other in a secondary market, where prices can deviate from their dollar pegs, particularly during periods of stress.
Public blockchains create another concern for the BIS. Stablecoins can circulate across multiple networks and through self-custody wallets, while moving the same asset between chains can require bridges or other infrastructure. De Cos argued that this structure creates interoperability problems and makes consistent enforcement of anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing controls more difficult.
Ardoino focused his response on the reserve structure behind the two forms of digital money. The Tether executive argued that stablecoins can be backed almost entirely by liquid reserves, including U.S. government debt, while commercial banks operate under a fractional reserve system in which only part of their liabilities are held in liquid assets.
His comments put the reserve question at the center of a debate that has increasingly divided stablecoin issuers and the banking sector as both compete to move fiat-denominated money onto blockchain networks.
Crypto.news recently examined how a tokenized bank deposit remains on the issuing bank’s balance sheet even after being represented on a blockchain. Unlike stablecoins, customer funds do not move into a separate reserve portfolio and can remain available to support the bank’s lending operations.
Tokenized deposits are moving beyond pilot programs Banks have started building infrastructure around that model as stablecoins take a larger role in digital payments.
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo are developing a shared deposit token network through The Clearing House, with a launch targeted for the first half of 2027. The planned system would initially give multinational companies access to programmable treasury and cross-border payment services.
SWIFT has pursued a similar route. In July, the financial messaging network launched a blockchain-based shared ledger with 17 major banks, including Citi, HSBC, UBS and BNP Paribas. The system was designed around tokenized bank deposits for round-the-clock cross-border payments.
Custodia Bank and Vantage Bank have taken a different approach by combining the two structures. Their dual-purpose token model is designed to operate as a bank deposit while inside the Hazel network and function as a stablecoin when transferred outside it. The Ethereum-based system has been under testing ahead of a planned fourth-quarter 2026 rollout.
Despite supporting tokenized deposits, Hernández de Cos acknowledged that the model has its own unresolved problems. No multi-bank or cross-jurisdictional ecosystem currently issues tokenized deposits through a fully interoperable framework, he said. Existing systems remain concentrated on permissioned platforms, while some designs resemble bank-issued stablecoins.
The BIS chief said stablecoins and tokenized deposits could ultimately coexist, but argued that tokenized deposits should handle most everyday payments while stablecoins serve more specialized functions.
Stablecoin growth raises the deposit flight question Ardoino’s criticism comes as the competition for deposits has become part of the U.S. debate over crypto market structure.
Banking groups have repeatedly pushed lawmakers to tighten stablecoin reward provisions in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. In July, the American Bankers Association, Independent Community Bankers of America and 76 state banking associations urged Senate leaders to revise Section 404 before the legislation reached the Senate floor.
The groups argued that allowing crypto platforms to provide certain rewards on stablecoin balances could encourage customers to move funds out of traditional bank accounts. Under that argument, deposit losses could leave community banks with less funding available for lending.
Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser repeated the concern in August while supporting passage of the CLARITY Act. Fraser warned that stablecoin rewards could draw deposits away from banks and affect their ability to extend credit.
The dispute partly traces back to the GENIUS Act, which prevents payment stablecoin issuers from directly paying interest or yield to holders. Crypto exchanges and other service providers can still offer some rewards depending on how their programs are structured, leaving lawmakers and banking groups divided over where the restrictions should apply.
Hernández de Cos raised a similar funding issue at Jackson Hole. Stablecoin issuers can increase demand for government debt by placing reserves into Treasury securities, potentially lowering sovereign borrowing costs, he said. At the same time, money leaving commercial bank deposits could increase bank funding costs and eventually raise borrowing costs for households and companies.
Ardoino presented the same movement of funds from the opposite perspective.
“What happens to financial system if people start realizing that stablecoins are safer and move their savings into the better asset class?” he said. “We’re in the Find Out phase.”
USDT remains the largest stablecoin by circulation and has developed a substantial user base outside the United States. Ardoino has repeatedly positioned the token as a dollar-based savings and payments product for markets where access to U.S. dollars or conventional banking services can be limited.
Tether has pursued that market through payment and remittance investments, including its May investment in cross-border platform LemFi, which serves users across African and Asian remittance corridors.
Ardoino said some economies now rely heavily on USDT for both domestic and foreign commerce, while the BIS has warned that increasing use of dollar-denominated stablecoins outside the United States could weaken monetary policy transmission and increase dependence on external monetary conditions.
USA₮ od Tetheru se už druhý měsíc po sobě drží nad 175 miliony tokenů a rezervní aktiva dosáhla 175,9 milionu USD, což znamenalo přebytek 661 079 USD. K 31. červenci bylo v oběhu 175 245 527 vykupitelných tokenů.
Tether’s USA₮ stablecoin maintained more than $175 million in circulation for a second consecutive month as its reserve surplus reached a record high, according to a reserve report released by Anchorage Digital Bank.
USA₮ had 175,245,527 redeemable tokens outstanding as of July 31, up roughly tenfold from the 17.5 million tokens reported at the end of January.
Reserve assets totaled $175.9 million, exceeding redeemable tokens outstanding by $661,079. The surplus was about 5% higher than the $628,518 reported in June and marked the highest level recorded to date.
Advertisement
About $158.4 million, representing roughly 90% of the reserve portfolio, was held in reverse repurchase agreements backed by US Treasury securities. The remaining $17.5 million was held in cash.
Anchorage Digital Bank said the assets were maintained in segregated and unencumbered fiduciary trust accounts for of USA₮ holders.
The July figures indicate that circulation has remained relatively stable after expanding rapidly during the first half of the year. USA₮ has now remained above $175 million across two consecutive month-end reports.
The reserve report was prepared under the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ 2025 criteria for reporting on asset-backed fiat-pegged tokens.
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said the company sees stablecoins becoming a larger part of the infrastructure used for payments and settlement as financial activity moves onto digital systems.
USA₮ CEO Bo Hines said the company is positioning the stablecoin for businesses and institutions seeking a digital dollar issued under US banking oversight.
USA₮ is being expanded across payments, settlement, treasury operations, and digital platforms as Tether builds out its US focused stablecoin business.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Ontology dočasně pozastavila produkci bloků na hlavní síti kvůli preventivní bezpečnostní kontrole. Podle týmu nejsou zatím známky ztráty či ohrožení aktiv ONT, ONG ani dalších on-chain aktiv.
The Ontology core development team has identified a potential security concern during our daily security check that requires immediate investigation.
As a precautionary measure, and with the security and integrity of the Ontology Mainnet as our highest priority, block production on the Ontology Mainnet will be temporarily suspended with immediate effect.
This emergency pause is being initiated proactively to allow the technical team and network validators to conduct a comprehensive security review of the network and its related components.
No Current Impact on User Assets
We would like to emphasize that:
No confirmed security incident has been identified at this time. There is currently no indication of any loss or compromise of user assets. ONT, ONG, and other on-chain assets remain unaffected based on our current assessment. The temporary suspension is a preventive security measure, rather than a response to confirmed asset loss or an ongoing attack. We are taking this action out of an abundance of caution to ensure that any potential risk is fully assessed before normal network operations resume.
Network Status
During the emergency security review:
Block production will remain temporarily suspended. On-chain transactions will not be processed while the network is paused. Users should not attempt to perform time-sensitive on-chain transactions until the network has been officially confirmed to have resumed. Users do not need to transfer or otherwise take action with their ONT, ONG, or other on-chain assets as a result of this announcement. The duration of the pause is currently undetermined. We will prioritize the thoroughness of the security review over speed and will not resume block production until the network has been sufficiently assessed and deemed safe to operate.
Next Steps
The Ontology team is treating this matter as a top priority and is working closely with validators and relevant ecosystem partners.
We will provide further updates through the official Ontology channels as soon as more information becomes available.
A separate announcement will be issued before or at the time of network resumption, once the security review and any required upgrades have been successfully completed.
We understand that an unexpected network pause may cause concern or inconvenience. However, we believe that taking immediate preventive action is the responsible approach when the security of the network may potentially be at risk.
The security and integrity of the Ontology Mainnet, as well as the safety of user assets, remain our highest priorities.
Thank you for your patience, understanding, and continued support.
공지사항혜택·이벤트업비트소식거래 이용 안내수수료 안내입출금 이용 안내입출금 현황시장경보 현황Open API 안내정책 및 거래지원 문의1:1 문의하기문의내역이용자 가이드카카오톡 문의(24시간)증명서 발급공시 안내공지사항
입출금
NEW
Ontology 네트워크 계열 디지털 자산 입출금 일시 중단 안내
안녕하세요. 가장 신뢰받는 디지털 자산 거래소 업비트입니다.
Ontology 네트워크의 네트워크 점검으로, 입출금을 일시 중단합니다.(가상자산이용자보호법 시행령 제17조 제1호 가목)
상세 내용
대상 디지털 자산 : 온톨로지(ONT), 온톨로지가스(ONG), 무비블록(MBL) - Ontology 네트워크
중단 범위 : 대상 디지털 자산 입출금
중단 사유 : 네트워크 점검
중단 기간 : 공지사항 등록 시점 ~ 입출금 안정성 확인 후 본 공지사항을 통해 지원 재개 안내 예정
*해당 디지털 자산의 거래는 중단 없이 지원됩니다.
유의사항
입출금 중단 기간 동안 아래 내용을 유의해주시기 바랍니다.
입금 반환 및 출금주소 등록 절차는 일시 중단되며, 입출금 재개 이후 순차적으로 처리될 예정입니다.
해당 디지털 자산 입금 시, 업비트 계정에 입금이 반영되지 않을 수 있으며, 이 경우 복구가 불가능할 수 있습니다.
입출금 중단 중에는 네트워크 혼잡 등의 사유로 입금 처리에 지연이 발생할 수 있으며, 블록체인 네트워크상 트랜잭션의 컨펌 완료 시점과 입금 반영 시점에 차이가 있을 수 있습니다.
입출금 중단 시점 전후 또는 예정되지 않은 점검 발생 시, 일부 블록체인 네트워크에서 입출금이 발생할 수 있으나, 점검 기간 중에는 당사 월렛 시스템상 정상 처리가 불가하여, 종료된 이후 확인 과정을 거쳐 순차적으로 처리될 예정입니다. 이에 회원님 계정에 반영처리가 지연될 수 있음을 양해 부탁드립니다.
업비트는 회원님의 자산을 안전하게 보호하기 위해 프로젝트팀과 긴밀히 협력할 예정이며, 관련하여 추가 또는 변경 사항이 발생할 경우 본 공지사항을 통해 안내드리겠습니다.
Baird u Palantiru ponechává doporučení Outperform a cílovou cenu 200 USD i po růstu ocenění na zhruba 448 miliard USD. Výnosy rostly o 93 % a výhled na rok 2026 počítá s růstem o 82 %.
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR, Financials), the artificial intelligence and data analytics company, still has support from Baird even after its valuation climbed to roughly $448 billion.
The firm, after a small group of investors saw a technical presentation, repeated its Outperform rating and $200 price target.
Baird's optimism about Palantir's future rests on its ontology, agentic AI capabilities and its rising role in sovereign AI. The obvious tension is the valuation.
Palantir shares were selling at about $186, giving the business a market valuation of about $448 billion. That means investors are already paying a steep price for development down the road. But the growth is still unusually strong.
Revenue growth picked up to 93% and the company's 2026 revenue growth outlook is currently at 82%. Gross margin is roughly 85%.
Other analysts have also raised their objectives. UBS boosted its objective to $220 while Phillip Securities raised its aim to $215.
Palantir's contract with the Pentagon for the Maven Smart System is likewise on track to generate an annual revenue run-rate of about $1 billion.
The next question is whether Palantir can keep growing fast enough to warrant one of the wealthiest values in software.
Micron Technology v pondělí vzrostla o 1,6 %, protože investoři zvažují, zda AI a dlouhodobé smlouvy zmírní cykličnost trhu s pamětí. Akcie jsou letos více než trojnásobně výše a obchodují se lehce nad šestinásobkem budoucích zisků.
Micron Technology MU shares rose 1.6% on Monday as investors continued to assess whether structural changes in the memory market could reduce the company's historically high earnings volatility.
Micron shares have more than tripled this year but trade at just above six times forward earnings.
That makes the stock one of the cheapest in the S&P 500, with only Charter Communications and General Motors trading at lower multiples, according to a CNBC report.
The discount has historically reflected the cyclical nature of the memory industry.
When supply is tight, memory prices and semiconductor profits can rise sharply. But higher prices typically encourage additional capacity, eventually putting pressure on pricing and earnings.
The current cycle, however, could be different as artificial intelligence drives demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) used in AI systems.
Nvidia's latest earnings highlighted the current pricing environment.
Nvidia CFO Colette Kress told analysts that the company was experiencing "extreme pricing conditions in memory" as component costs increased significantly.
Micron is one of three major suppliers of HBM for AI systems, potentially positioning it to benefit from elevated memory demand and pricing.
Despite that backdrop, Micron's shares initially gained about 3% following Nvidia's results before reversing and closing lower that session.
D.A. Davidson analyst Gil Luria attributed part of the move to a broader trading unwind involving semiconductor and software positions.
The reaction illustrates the debate surrounding Micron: investors must determine whether current earnings represent another peak in a traditional memory cycle or reflect a more durable change in the industry's economics.
Additional memory capacity is expected to come online, including increased competition from China.
That could eventually put pressure on prices. However, Micron has also entered long-term customer agreements that could change the company's exposure to future cycles.
Micron's newer agreements include binding volume commitments, take-or-pay provisions and, in many cases, price floors.
The contracts generally extend through 2030, and Micron has said that once planned agreements are completed, roughly half or more of its revenue should be covered.
These arrangements can limit Micron's ability to capture the full upside when memory prices surge. But they could also provide protection when the cycle turns downward.
For contracts containing price bands, management has said minimum prices would imply gross margins "well above" Micron's peak quarterly margins in previous memory cycles.
That creates a potential shift in how investors assess the stock. Rather than maximizing earnings during periods of extreme shortages, Micron may be exchanging some peak-cycle upside for greater earnings visibility.
The company remains exposed to market prices, and the memory industry is still cyclical.
Contracts can eventually reset, additional supply will enter the market and the long-term strength of AI demand remains uncertain.
The key question is whether those risks are now sufficiently lower to justify a higher valuation multiple.
Mizuho lowered its Micron price target to $1,300 from $1,375, citing multiple compression across the semiconductor sector.
Despite the lower target, Mizuho maintained a bullish fundamental view, noting that "aggregate DRAM demand continues to grow" and that market de-specification was a response to "tight DRAM supply."
Mizuho also maintained an Outperform rating on SanDisk (SNDK), lowering its price target to $1,875 from $1,900. The firm expects SanDisk's earnings per share to increase fivefold between fiscal 2026 and 2028.
Mizuho further estimated that SanDisk could potentially use $30 billion to $50 billion of aggregate free cash flow between 2027 and 2028 to repurchase 25% to 30% of the company.
JPMorgan uvedla, že obavy z konkurenceschopnosti Broadcomu vůči Alphabetu jsou před zveřejněním výsledků přehnané. Analytik čeká solidní výsledky za červencové čtvrtletí a lepší než očekávaný výhled pro říjnové čtvrtletí.
Broadcom Inc (NASDAQ:AVGO) is scheduled to report its fiscal third-quarter results on Sept. 2.
Recent channel checks indicate that investor concerns around the company’s competitive position at Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL) seem to be "overstated," according to JPMorgan.
• Broadcom stock is taking a breather. Where is AVGO stock headed?
The Broadcom Analyst: Analyst Harlan Sur maintained an Overweight rating and price target of $580.
The Broadcom Thesis: The stock has lagged the broader semiconductor group year to date, having risen only by 7% versus a 69% gain in the index, Sur said in the note.
Check out other analyst stock ratings.
He added that much of the underperformance in Broadcom’s shares stem from:
Concerns around potential share loss at Google longer-term. Management having reiterated their AI revenue guidance for fiscal 2027 to exceed $100 billion. Channel checks over the last 90 days indicate that the recent partnerships with Alphabet and Marvell Technology Inc (NASDAQ:MRVL), as well as noise around potential suppliers, "are more reflective of GOOGL bringing on more partners to support its internal COT team and to support TPU-attach opportunities," the analyst wrote.
No other company is likely to displace Broadcom’s position as Alphabet’s core TPU partner, given the terms of the agreement signed in early April, in which Alphabet committed to annually increasing TPU-related purchases at Broadcom and "anchored AVGO as the volume partner for the next four generations of TPU SKUs," he further stated.
Boss said he expects Broadcom to report "solid" results for the July quarter and announce better-than-expected guidance for the October quarter, with fiscal 2026 AI revenues of more than $56 billion.
AI revenues in fiscal 2027 are likely to be above management’s current guidance of over $100 billion, and could surpass $130 billion, considering potential industry supply constraints "as customer commitments, backlog and order momentum continue to build across ASIC/XPU and AI networking," the analyst added.
AVGO Price Action: Shares of Broadcom are up slightly at 0.41% to $370.22 at the time of publication on Monday.
Read Next
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Broadcom oznámí výsledky za fiskální třetí čtvrtletí po uzavření trhu 2. září. Management očekává, že výnosy z AI polovodičů vzrostou meziročně o více než 200 % na 16 miliard USD.
Broadcom (AVGO +0.18%) has been a disappointment for investors so far this year -- the stock is up 6%, but that's only half the performance of the S&P 500, which is up 12% year to date.
However, the semiconductor maker is reporting earnings for its fiscal third quarter after the market close on Sept. 2. And as management previously issued guidance for AI semiconductor revenue to grow more than 200% from a year ago to reach $16 billion, there are plenty of reasons for investors to be paying close attention to Broadcom stock this week.
About Broadcom stockBroadcom is a chipmaker, but it operates in a different lane from Advanced Micro Devices and Nvidia. It designs chips known as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) that are customized for Broadcom's customers, so while they aren't as versatile as Nvidia's top-of-the-line chips, they perform the functions its customers require so that they can be made less expensively.
Image source: Getty Images.
One of Broadcom's key customers is Alphabet, with whom Broadcom has worked over the last decade to create Google's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), as an alternative to Nvidia's chips. Alphabet has been using TPUs in its own infrastructure, and it has begun selling TPU systems to third-party customers.
But here's also the problem for Broadcom. Alphabet and Marvell Technology recently announced a deal in which Marvell issued a warrant that gives Google the right to buy up to 58.9 million Marvell shares at $206.58 per share, or about $12.2 billion. Marvell said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the agreement includes products that "attach to the (TPU) ecosystem" and is tied to milestones in its commercial relationship to help Google meet demand for its custom chips.
The filing follows an April report outlining a deal between Marvell and Google for AI workloads, including a TPU and a memory processing unit.
So naturally, there's concern that Alphabet's decision to expand its TPU business through Marvell will hurt Broadcom. Broadcom's stock fell sharply in April on news of the report. Marvell stock, meanwhile, is up 147% this year.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
90/100
Today's Change
(
0.18
%) $
0.66
Current Price
$
369.45
Morningstar analyst William Kerwin told Reuters that the deal is a "big win" for Marvell, but should be seen as Alphabet expanding its network of chipmaking partners "rather than a competitive displacement of Broadcom."
What to look for when Broadcom reports earningsIt's not like Broadcom has been doing poorly this year. In fact, business has been strong for the chipmaker. Revenue in the fiscal second quarter (ending May 3) was $22.18 billion, up 48% from a year ago. Net income was $9.31 billion, up 88%, and earnings of $1.91 per share were up 85% from the second quarter of 2025.
"Broadcom achieved record revenue, operating profit, and free cash flow in Q2 driven by accelerating growth in AI semiconductor revenue and strong operating leverage," CEO Hock Tan said. "Q2 semiconductor revenue from AI of $10.8 billion grew 143% year-over-year, above our forecast, driven by increasing demand for custom AI accelerators and AI networking.
"The momentum continues, and in Q3 we expect semiconductor revenue from AI to grow over 200% year-over-year to $16 billion," he said.
If Broadcom can hit that number -- $16 billion in semiconductor revenue with 200% growth -- then it would go a long way in easing investors' concerns about Marvell. Alphabet has deep pockets, having recently increased its projected capital expenditures this year from $185 billion to $200 billion, and that doesn't appear to be slowing down anytime soon.
Hitting or exceeding $16 billion in semiconductor revenue would show that demand for Broadcom's custom AI accelerators and networking products remains strong, even as Alphabet expands its relationship with Marvell. And if management issues guidance for continued strong growth in Q4, then the stock's year-to-date underperformance could be a golden opportunity to accumulate shares.
Broadcom (AVGO +0.18%) has truly become the next Nvidia in terms of recent price movements. Both chipmakers have crushed the S&P 500 over the past five years, but the year-to-date returns paint a very different picture.
A strong earnings report recently put Nvidia's year-to-date gains above the S&P 500, but Broadcom still lags the famed index. Broadcom is only up by 6% year to date, but this sluggish performance shouldn't last forever. Here's why Broadcom is primed to continue beating the S&P 500 in the long run.
Image source: Getty Images.
AI chip demand isn't slowing down Artificial intelligence (AI) chips are foundational for large language models (LLMs), agentic AI, cloud computing, and other technologies. They will also play a major role in physical AI applications, such as humanoid robots and self-driving vehicles.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
90/100
Today's Change
(
0.18
%) $
0.66
Current Price
$
369.45
Grand View Research projects a 30.6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for the AI industry through 2033. Some companies will grow faster than others, and Broadcom is already proving it's a top-tier chipmaker in terms of growth.
The chipmaker reported 48% year-over-year revenue growth in the second quarter. AI semiconductor sales drove almost half of that growth.
Broadcom specializes in application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), which are different from Nvidia's graphics processing units (GPUs). Soaring Nvidia demand isn't a bad thing for Broadcom since they are similar companies but not direct competitors like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices.
The Marvell Technology news is overblown Marvell Technology is one of the biggest reasons Broadcom is trailing the S&P 500. The company, which also provides ASIC chips, partnered with Alphabet, which could lead to a long-term relationship and up to $120 billion in potential revenue over the next six years.
The theory is that Alphabet may become less reliant on Broadcom if the Marvell partnership goes well.
The guidance from Broadcom's Q2 results indicated that AI semiconductor revenue will at least triple year over year in its fiscal 2026 Q3 results. Broadcom also expects consolidated revenue to reach $29.4 billion, representing an 84% year-over-year increase. That projection also implies a 32% sequential jump.
This type of growth suggests that Broadcom's top customers are not slowing down on their purchases. Alphabet already works with Nvidia and AMD, two of the largest GPU makers, so it's not foreign for the company to work with two of the leading ASIC chipmakers.
Nvidia's earnings offer a hint for Broadcom's upcoming results A catalyst is on the horizon that can help Broadcom catch up to the S&P 500 and outperform it by the end of the year. Broadcom is set to report its fiscal 2026 Q3 results on Sept. 2.
Investors will look closely at AI semiconductor revenue, which is supposed to reach $16 billion per guidance. It would represent more than half of total revenue in that quarter, and as it becomes a larger slice of Broadcom's business, its sales should continue to accelerate.
Investors can take a look at Nvidia's results for a hint of what Broadcom may deliver when it reports earnings. Nvidia crushed guidance by generating $96.2 billion in its fiscal 2027 Q2, compared to guidance of $91 billion.
It's much harder for a company like Nvidia to beat guidance and set higher targets. Nvidia is aiming for $108 billion in fiscal 2027 Q3 revenue, so it's still growing. Broadcom hasn't tapped into as large of a market share yet, so it should be easier for the ASIC chipmaker to beat guidance and offer optimistic remarks for the rest of the year.
Notably, Broadcom only trades at a 20 forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. That valuation puts the stock in a prime position to rally if it beats expectations when it reports on Sept. 2.
Palo Alto Networks má podle Jefferies ve 4. fiskálním čtvrtletí překonat očekávání u RPO, ARR i tržeb. Firma má také podle odhadu nabídnout výhled tržeb na fiskální rok 2027 nad konsensem.
Palo Alto Networks Inc (NYSE:PANW, XETRA:5AP) is likely to top fiscal fourth-quarter expectations on remaining performance obligations, annual recurring revenue and total revenue, with product growth potentially reaching 18% year-over-year versus consensus, according to Jefferies.
Shares have climbed 30% since third-quarter results, well ahead of the 5% gain in the iShares Expanded Tech-Software ETF, raising the bar for this print.
Jefferies still expects management to guide fiscal 2027 revenue growth above the current consensus of 21% year-over-year, and has confidence in more than $6.4 billion of free cash flow in FY28, supporting its $450 price target.
Channel checks support the setup. Jefferies' VAR survey showed Palo Alto's average performance versus plan rising to positive 4.8% from positive 1.8% quarter-over-quarter, while Fortinet's 52% product growth in its own blowout quarter is seen as a positive read-across. SASE remains the top growth area flagged in the survey, followed by identity and cloud security, both now part of Palo Alto's portfolio.
CyberArk was the outlier, with performance versus plan falling to 0.9% from 3.8%, which Jefferies said may reflect rebranding or resellers folding its results into Palo Alto's.
The F4Q ARR guide of $8.9 billion to $8.95 billion implies 28% organic growth, an acceleration from F3Q's 17% despite a tougher comparison. Jefferies views this as achievable given strong survey work, comparable strength from CrowdStrike, Fortinet and Okta, and record ARR tied to hardware backlog.
On FY27, Jefferies called consensus revenue growth of 21.1% "easily attainable," noting pro forma revenue across Palo Alto, Chronosphere and CyberArk grew 17.4% year-over-year through the first three quarters of FY26.
The firm also expects Palo Alto to guide FY27 next-generation security ARR at least in line with, and potentially above, consensus expectations of $10.9 billion, up 22% year-over-year.
No Investment Advice
Proactive Investors is a publisher of financial news and information. No content in this record, or published on the Proactive Investors website (the "Site"), constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable or advisable for any specific person. No content is tailored to any specific person's needs, objectives, or financial situation.
Proactive Investors is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer and does not provide personalized investment advice. Nothing in this record constitutes investment advice or a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell any security. None of the information providers or their affiliates will advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, advisability, value, or suitability of any particular security, portfolio, transaction, or investment strategy. Any decision to buy, sell, or hold a security should be made only after consulting an appropriately qualified, licensed financial adviser and reading all relevant offering documentation.
This record, and any record we publish by or on behalf of our clients, should not be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any product or security. Our content is independent financial journalism, produced in a neutral, objective style with full source attribution.
In accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's guidelines on material connections, Proactive Investors discloses the following: we may receive cash or, in some cases, equity compensation from companies whose news is distributed through our platform. This compensation is for news distribution and media services, not for editorial content or coverage decisions. Where Proactive Investors has a commercial relationship with a company covered in this record, that relationship is disclosed within the article. Any such relationship does not determine, influence, or shape the editorial content produced. Where we receive equity compensation, such securities are held independently by a third-party broker and sold at the broker's discretion.
The Site may contain opinions from time to time regarding securities mentioned in other products, including company-related products, and those opinions may differ from those obtained through another Proactive Investors product. Opinions and commentary reflect the views of the named author at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice.
Price and other data is supplied by sources believed to be reliable. Any calculations are made using such data. Neither the data nor the calculations are guaranteed by those sources, by Proactive Investors, by the information providers, or by any other person or entity, and may not be complete or accurate.
From time to time, reference may be made in our marketing materials to previously published articles or opinions. Such references may be selective, may reference only a portion of an article, and are likely not to be current. As markets change continuously, previously published information and data may not be current and should not be relied upon.
Binance 3. září 2026 v 06:00 UTC vyřadí 12 párů pro obchodování na marži, včetně SUI/BTC, AVAX/BTC a LINK/BTC. Změna se týká pouze obchodování na marži; na ostatních párech zůstanou obchodovatelné.
Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Leading crypto exchange Binance is planning to delist 12 margin trading pairs in early September, including major cryptocurrencies SUI, Avalanche (AVAX), and Chainlink (LINK). This particularly affects Bitcoin pairs of SUI, Avalanche, and Chainlink.
In a recent announcement, Binance issued a notice of removal for margin trading pairs scheduled for September 3, 2026.
In its post, Binance said it will delist the affected margin trading pairs on September 3 at 06:00 (UTC). A total of 12 Isolated Margin Pairs will be delisted; five of these are on Cross Margin.
HOT Stories
The Isolated Margin Pairs include SUI/BTC, AVAX/BTC, LINK/BTC, TNSR/USDC, SXT/USDC, TURTLE/USDC, AIXBT/USDC, BREV/USDC, USDE/USDC, WBETH/ETH, BFUSD/USDT, and BNSOL/SOL. Five pairs — TNSR/USDC, SXT/USDC, TURTLE/USDC, AIXBT/USDC, and BREV/USDC — will be delisted on Cross Margin.
You Might Also Like
Effective immediately, users may no longer be able to transfer any amount of assets of the aforementioned pairs via manual transfers and Auto-Transfer Mode into their Isolated Margin accounts.
Dates for usersBinance highlighted the dates in the delisting process of these margin pairs: on September 1 at 06:00 (UTC), Binance Margin will suspend isolated margin borrowing on the isolated margin pairs.
On September 3 at 06:00 (UTC), Binance Margin will close users' positions, conduct an automatic settlement, and cancel all pending orders on the aforementioned cross and isolated margin pairs, and they will afterward be removed from Binance Margin.
You Might Also Like
The delisting only affects the said margin pairs, as users can still trade the above assets on other trading pairs available on Binance Margin.
To avoid potential losses, users are urged to close their positions and/or transfer their assets from Margin Accounts to Spot Accounts prior to the cessation of Margin trading on September 3 at 06:00 (UTC). This is because they will not be able to update their positions during the delisting process, which may take about 3 hours.
On September 3 as well, Binance has already earmarked 3 crypto assets for delisting: ICON (ICX), Secret (SCRT), and Storj (STORJ), following its recent review.
In a previous announcement, Binance said it has decided to delist and cease trading on all spot trading pairs for the tokens on September 3 at 03:00 (UTC).
Circle’s USDC Treasury torched roughly $107M worth of USDC in a single burn event, part of the stablecoin issuer’s ongoing effort to keep its token supply aligned with actual demand. The transaction, flagged by on-chain tracker Whale Alert, clocked in at exactly $107,083,512.
For anyone unfamiliar with the mechanics: burning stablecoins is the opposite of printing money. When users or institutions redeem USDC for actual US dollars, Circle destroys the corresponding tokens so the total supply doesn’t exceed the reserves backing it.
A routine event in a not-so-routine market Burns of this size barely register as news in Circle’s operational calendar anymore. The company has executed similar transactions regularly, with recent examples including a 116 million USDC burn in June and a 153 million USDC burn on Solana later in the year. Individual burns have ranged from tens of millions to north of $200M in single events throughout 2025 and 2026.
Advertisement
USDC maintains a 1:1 peg to the US dollar, meaning every token in circulation should theoretically have a corresponding dollar sitting in a reserve account. When redemptions happen, Circle burns the tokens to keep that ratio intact.
Cross-chain dynamics and the Solana factor What makes Circle’s recent activity more interesting than any single burn is the broader pattern of where USDC liquidity is moving. The stablecoin now operates natively on over 30 networks, but Solana has been getting an increasing share of attention.
Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol, known as CCTP, allows USDC to move between blockchains without the need for traditional bridge mechanisms. Instead of locking tokens on one chain and minting wrapped versions on another, CCTP burns tokens on the source chain and mints fresh ones on the destination chain, keeping the total supply constant.
The uptick in Solana-based USDC activity has been supported by institutional partnerships. BNY Mellon, one of the oldest financial institutions in the US, has been expanding its access to USDC minting capabilities.
The 153 million USDC burn on Solana suggests significant redemption activity on that chain, which paradoxically indicates healthy usage. Tokens get burned because people are actively using them, not because they’re sitting dormant.
What this means for the stablecoin landscape The burn-and-mint cycle serves as a real-time indicator of capital flows in crypto markets. Large redemptions and thus large burns can signal that institutions are moving capital out of digital assets and back into traditional finance. Conversely, large mints suggest fresh capital entering the ecosystem.
The growing institutional infrastructure around USDC, from BNY Mellon’s minting access to CCTP’s cross-chain capabilities, positions Circle to capture a larger share of on-chain settlement activity as tokenized finance matures.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Intercontinental Exchange zvýšila výhled růstu opakovaných výnosů na rok 2026 na 7 % až 8 %. Zároveň zvedla odhad upravených provozních nákladů na 4,190 až 4,230 miliardy USD.
Key Takeaways Intercontinental Exchange closed at $162.33, an 8.3% discount to its 52-week high of $177.ICE raised 2026 recurring revenue growth guidance to 7%-8% as data services and network technology expand.ICE lifted 2026 adjusted operating expense guidance to $4.190-$4.230 billion, limiting near-term margins. Shares of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE - Free Report) closed at $162.33 on Friday, an 8.3% discount to its 52-week high of $177.00.
ICE stock has lost 1.5% year to date compared with the industry’s decrease of 4.2%. The Finance sector has gained 7.9% and the Zacks S&P 500 composite has gained 12.2% in the same time frame. ICE shares are losing momentum despite resilient fundamentals, likely reflecting concerns over slower near-term growth, softer second-half guidance, weakness in energy trading and slower mortgage recovery.
ICE is a leading global operator of regulated exchanges, clearing houses and listings venues and a provider of data services for commodity, financial, fixed income and equity markets. A compelling portfolio, expansive risk-management services, strategic buyouts, solid balance sheet and effective capital deployment poise it well for growth.
ICE vs Industry, Sector, S&P 500
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Shares of Nasdaq Inc (NDAQ - Free Report) have gained 1.5% year to date, while those of CME Group (CME - Free Report) have gained 5% in the same time frame.
Are ICE Shares Affordable?The stock is undervalued compared with its industry. It is currently trading at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 18.98, lower than the industry average of 21.6 and the median of 22.07 over three years.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
ICE is relatively cheap compared to Nasdaq and CME Group.
The Case for ICE StockThe planned MarketAxess acquisition extends Intercontinental Exchange’s network strategy into institutional credit execution while complementing its retail and wealth distribution, pricing, indices, analytics and clearing capabilities.
ICE remains well-positioned to benefit from continued digitization across the mortgage origination and servicing lifecycle. Management expects third-quarter recurring revenues to remain broadly stable as core growth and new client ramps build. The $3.4 billion in future performance obligations as of June 30, 2026, also provides strong longer-term revenue visibility.
With capabilities spanning execution, market data, clearing, and workflow solutions across major asset classes, ICE maintains a diversified business model that reduces reliance on any single activity driver. Its Fixed Income and Data Services segment continues to expand through pricing, reference data, indices, and network technology. Management raised 2026 recurring revenue growth guidance to 7%-8%, although second-half growth is expected toward the lower end due to tougher data-center comparisons.
ICE is also leveraging proprietary data in client decision-making tools. Its expanded ICE Model Context Protocol enables governed access to proprietary data within institutional AI workflows, while ICE Compass applies pricing and transaction data to pre-trade fixed-income analytics.
Finally, ICE’s $600 million investment in Polymarket highlights its confidence in prediction markets as an emerging, data-driven asset class. The investment could create synergies with ICE’s exchange and data businesses, broaden its addressable market, and position the company to benefit from growing regulatory acceptance and innovation in alternative financial markets.
However, ICE continues to increase spending on performance compensation, technology capacity and product development. Full-year 2026 adjusted operating expense guidance was increased to $4.190-$4.230 billion, while third-quarter adjusted expenses are expected in the range of $1.063-$1.073 billion.
Growth Projections for ICEThe Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 revenues indicates a 10.7% year-over-year increase, while that for earnings suggests a 16.6% year-over-year increase. The consensus estimate for 2027 revenues indicates a 5.1% year-over-year increase, while that for earnings suggests an increase of 8.4% year over year.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The expected long-term earnings growth rate is pegged at 12.7%.
Optimist Analyst Sentiment on ICEThe consensus estimate for 2026 and 2027 earnings has moved 6 cents and 3 cents north, respectively, in the past 30 days, reflecting analysts' optimism.
The consensus estimates for 2026 earnings of Nasdaq moved 2 cents north in the last 30 days.
The consensus estimates for 2026 earnings of CME witnessed no movement in the last 30 days.
Parting Thoughts on ICE SharesIntercontinental Exchange benefits from a diversified exchange and a data and mortgage workflow portfolio that can perform across market cycles. Solid growth projections and optimistic analyst sentiment instill confidence.
However, higher operating and capital spending limiting near-term margin expansion keeps us on the sidelines. Therefore, it is better to adopt a wait-and-see approach on this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Three seconds doesn’t sound like a long time until you’re staring at a loading screen every time you want to send a private transaction. Zakura, the developer behind a Zcash full node client, just released an open-source library called Zakura Common that compresses shielded transaction creation from over three seconds to under 200 milliseconds.
The upgrade does not require a hard fork, a consensus change, or anything that would force the Zcash network to coordinate a synchronized update. Compatible wallets can simply integrate the new library and start serving faster transactions immediately.
The numbers behind the speed boost Mobile proof generation, the computation-heavy step that makes shielded transactions possible on phones, is now more than 14 times faster. Desktop performance improved by over five times. Sinsemilla hashing, a core cryptographic operation used in Zcash’s Orchard protocol, saw a 21-fold improvement. Trial decryption, the process wallets use to scan the blockchain and identify incoming payments, got 1.5 times faster. And zk-SNARK verification, the zero-knowledge proof system that underpins Zcash’s privacy guarantees, now runs four to eight times quicker.
The library is dual-licensed under MIT and Apache 2.0. It will ship as part of Zakura version 1.3.0, and wallets built on Zakura’s infrastructure, such as Vizor, can integrate the improvements without waiting for broader network coordination.
Why shielded transaction speed matters Sean Bowe, co-founder of both Zcash and Zakura, highlighted the practical significance of the release. He noted that the libraries deliver measurable benefits for shielded wallets and full nodes, enhancing responsiveness and user experience without requiring rule changes.
Market reaction and broader context ZEC, Zcash’s native token, jumped approximately 5% following the Zakura Common announcement.
The release fits into a larger roadmap. Zakura has been building toward high-throughput private payments through its node software, and the broader Tachyon initiative aims to improve scalability across the Zcash network, wallets, and verification processes. Zakura Common will be integrated as part of Zakura v1.3.0, and focuses solely on enhancing existing shielded functionalities without altering the fundamental monetary policy or introducing new trust assumptions.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Monero [XMR] vzrostlo během dne o 9 % na zhruba 516 USD a znovu překonalo hranici 500 USD. THORChain 3.2 zavedl nativní swapy XMR za BTC, ETH a stablecoiny, což podpořilo likviditu.
Monero [XMR] is showing strong upside momentum. After failing to hold $500 earlier, the altcoin’s bullish pressure strengthened, reclaiming $500 and hiking to a high of $520.
At press time, Monero was trading around $516, marking an 11% surge on the daily charts. Over the same period, the altcoin trading volume surged 206%, reflecting strong market activity and steady capital flows.
Why is Monero upside pressure holding? While Monero’s rebound was not driven by events over the past days, investors have shown optimism with the recent structural upgrade.
As such, the THORChain network upgrade introduced native support for Monero swaps. The THORSChain 3.2 upgrade introduced Monero swaps against Bitcoin [BTC], Ethereum [ETH], and stablecoins.
This improvement has significantly improved XMR access and liquidity. Since it allows swaps XMR non-custodially on cross-chain DEX, it has become a major boost because of Monero restrictions on centralized exchanges.
Are speculators chasing the rally? Incentivized by this development, traders returned with strength across the market. Speculators, for example, have shown greater determination to capitalize on these market gains.
According to CoinGlass data, Monero’s Open Interest (OI) surged 16% to $304 million at press time, while the Derivatives Volume rose 319% to $325 million.
Source: Coinglass When OI and volume rise in tandem, it reflects increased market participation and capital inflow. Thus, traders deployed significant capital into opening new positions.
Meanwhile, the Long/Short Ratio climbed above 1, excluding Binance top traders. At 1.08, the ratio implied that most traders were bullish and were betting on more gains.
Can XMR sustain these gains? Monero‘s bullish pressure has intensified, with demand becoming sustainable, which in turn has strengthened upward momentum. In fact, a look at the momentum indicators validates this view. The altcoin’s Stochastic Momentum Index (SMI) extended its surge, hiking to 60 as of writing.
With the SMI edging deep into the bullish zone, it suggested that upside momentum is strong with bulls enjoying commanding control.
Source: TradingView Likewise, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) also extended its surge, rising to the overbought zone. At 80, RSI further confirms buyers have total control of the market.
As of now, these two indicators signal that the prevailing trend is most likely to continue. Therefore, if the market demand recently witnessed holds, Monero will reclaim $527 and target $546 in the short term.
However, if the attempted upside move fails again, XMR is likely to fall below $500, with $460 as a key support level.
Final Summary Monero extended its bullish structure, rising 9%, to reclaim and flip $500, reaching a local high of $520. XMR’s upside momentum although driven by strong demand , recent THORChain upgrade has incentivized investors to return.
Crenessity od Neurocrine Biosciences utržil v první polovině roku 2026 337 milionů USD, meziročně zhruba o 400 % více. Přibližně 15 % diagnostikovaných pacientů s klasickou CAH už lék dostává, takže prostor pro další růst zůstává.
Key Takeaways Crenessity sales hit $337 million in the first half of 2026, up roughly 400% year over year.About 15% of diagnosed classic CAH patients have been prescribed Crenessity, leaving room to expand.Vertex's planned $10 billion Crinetics deal could strengthen a key rival currently advancing phase III. Neurocrine Biosciences (NBIX - Free Report) continues to rely heavily on its blockbuster VMAT2 inhibitor, Ingrezza, for top-line growth. Still, the company is making meaningful progress beyond the drug as Crenessity gains traction in classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a rare genetic condition involving the adrenal glands.
Launched in December 2024, Crenessity is an oral therapy designed to reduce excessive adrenal androgen production and, in turn, help lower the amount of glucocorticoid (steroid) treatment needed. The drug is emerging as an increasingly important contributor to Neurocrine's commercial portfolio.
Crenessity generated $337 million in sales during the first half of 2026, up roughly 400% year over year and surpassing the $301 million generated in 2025. The strong performance was supported by growing adoption among adult and pediatric patients, with Neurocrine's prescriber base nearly tripling from a year ago. The rapid uptake highlights the drug's increasing contribution to Neurocrine's revenue base and its potential to become a meaningful growth driver alongside Ingrezza.
Neurocrine has not yet provided sales guidance for Crenessity, as the launch remains relatively early and the company continues to learn more about the market and the drug's growth trajectory. About 15% of the estimated diagnosed classic CAH population has now been prescribed the drug, while Neurocrine estimates that at least 20,000 people in the United States have classic CAH. This low penetration leaves substantial room for further adoption and sales expansion. Meanwhile, reimbursement for dispensed prescriptions was approximately 80% in the second quarter, and Neurocrine continues to broaden its reach among pediatric and adult endocrinologists and Centers of Excellence.
Competition Could Pose a Concern for NBIX Over TimeCrenessity's growing presence in the CAH market could face increasing competition from Crinetics Pharmaceuticals’ (CRNX - Free Report) atumelnant, a once-daily oral ACTH receptor antagonist. The drug is currently being evaluated in a phase III study for classic CAH. The competitive threat is becoming more notable following Vertex Pharmaceuticals' (VRTX - Free Report) agreement to acquire CRNX for $10 billion. Announced last month, the deal would bring atumelnant into Vertex's portfolio, providing the candidate with the resources of a larger pharmaceutical company as it advances through late-stage development. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026.
Other companies, including Lundbeck Pharmaceuticals and OMass Therapeutics, are also developing potential CAH therapies, though their programs are at earlier stages of development.
NBIX’s Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesShares of Neurocrine Biosciences have outperformed the industry year to date, as seen in the chart below.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The company is currently trading at a premium to the industry. Based on the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, the stock trades at 3.64 times forward 12-month sales, above the industry average of 2.04 times.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Estimate revisions for Neurocrine Biosciences’ 2026 and 2027 EPS have been mixed over the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Neurocrine currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Algorand 31. srpna zpracoval za 24 hodin přes 584 000 transakcí, což byl nejrušnější den sítě za předchozích sedm dní. Aktivita na chainu letos dál roste.
Algorand Hits Weekly Transaction PeakThe Algorand network recorded a localized surge in activity on August 31, processing over 584,000 transactions in a single 24-hour window, according to @AlgoFoundation. The figure represents the busiest day on the network within the prior seven-day period, pointing to a meaningful short-term uptick in on-chain demand for the $ALGO-powered layer-1 blockchain.
While a single-day reading does not on its own signal a structural shift, it sits against a backdrop of steadily rising cumulative activity. Total transactions on the network rose to 3.64 billion as of June 2026, with node participation increasing by nearly 3% month-over-month. The network has added users and validators at a consistent pace throughout the year, and daily spikes of this kind tend to reflect bursts of activity tied to specific applications or ecosystem events.
Broader Activity Trends Support the MomentumThe single-day figure is consistent with a wider pattern of growing engagement on Algorand in 2026. USDC transacted volume on the network rose by more than 72% month-over-month to approximately $751 million in June, the highest monthly level recorded in the first half of 2026. Algorand also reported 1.8 million new smart contract deployments in a recent quarter, a 25.7% increase.
Builder activity has been a consistent contributor to on-chain volume. Builder activity saw a sharp recovery in May, with contracts deployed rising 47% and new asset creation more than tripling from April. Algorand's real-world asset ecosystem processed more than 23.2 million tokenized asset transactions during the second quarter, underscoring that the network's growth is tied to actual usage rather than speculation.
On the regulatory front, the network has also gained a clearer footing in the United States. In March and April 2026, both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission jointly categorized $ALGO as a digital commodity. This official recognition removed significant compliance hurdles that had previously kept many large investors on the sidelines.
The August 31 transaction spike adds another data point to what has been a year of building momentum for the Algorand network, even as token price has lagged behind on-chain fundamentals.
Sources:
Algorand Foundation: June 2026 Algo Insights Report
Crypto Briefing: Algorand Sees 1.8M New Contract Deployments
Cryptonomist: Algorand Price Rally and Institutional Milestone
Essential Utilities od roku 2015 přidala více než 138 000 zákazníků a z rozpracovaných akvizic čeká na více než 200 000 dalších. Firma plánuje v roce 2026 investovat 1,7 miliardy USD a míří na 5–7% roční růst EPS do roku 2027.
Key Takeaways Essential Utilities added over 138,000 customers since 2015, with 200,000 more tied to pending deals. WTRG's purchase agreements cover more than 200,000 customers for about $282 million. Essential Utilities plans $1.7 billion in 2026 investment and targets 5-7% annual EPS growth through 2027. Essential Utilities (WTRG - Free Report) is benefiting from customer-base growth driven by organic expansion and water and wastewater acquisitions. This expansion broadens its service footprint, increases demand for essential utility services and supports infrastructure expansion across its regulated operations.
The company added more than 138,000 customers or equivalent dwelling units since 2015, while pending acquisitions are expected to serve more than 200,000 additional customers. It also completed the acquisition of Integra Water Texas’ wastewater system, adding approximately 1,100 customers, while its active municipal acquisition pipeline represents about 400,000 potential customers.
The company’s signed purchase agreements cover more than 200,000 customers for about $282 million. WTRG’s customer expansion is also supported by infrastructure spending, and it plans to invest about $1.7 billion in 2026 while targeting 5-7% annual EPS growth through 2027.
Overall, acquisitions and infrastructure investments are expected to support WTRG’s long-term expansion and customer growth.
Customer Growth Strengthens Utility ExpansionGrowing customer numbers can benefit water utilities by increasing demand for essential services and creating opportunities to expand infrastructure. A broader customer base can also help utilities generate stable revenues while enabling continued investments in water systems, treatment facilities and network upgrades.
American Water Works (AWK - Free Report) added about 52,700 customer connections through acquisitions in the first half of 2026, supporting expansion across its regulated water footprint.
California Water Service Group (CWT - Free Report) serves about 2 million people through 497,600 California connections, while acquisitions and infrastructure investments provide additional opportunities for customer and rate-base growth.
The Zacks Rundown on WTRGWTRG’s Earnings EstimatesThe Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 and 2027 EPS indicates a year-over-year increase of 0.45% and 9.73%, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
WTRG’s Stock Trading at a Premium WTRG is trading at a premium to the industry, with a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 17.45 versus the industry average of 17.34X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
WTRG’s Stock Price PerformanceIn the past month, the company’s shares have risen 5.9% compared with the industry’s 0.7% growth.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
WTRG’s Zacks RankWTRG currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
McKesson potvrdil průnik do několika cloudových účtů a únik dat; hackeři ze skupiny ShinyHunters tvrdí, že získali miliony řádků údajů o pacientech a požadovali 55 milionů USD.
A prolific hacking group has taken credit for last week’s cyberattack against U.S. pharmaceutical distribution giant McKesson, leading to the latest spill of highly sensitive health data by an American healthcare company in recent months.
McKesson confirmed Friday in a statement on its website that hackers broke into several of its cloud-hosted accounts earlier in the week and exfiltrated data, and that the company expected “intermittent service degradation” related to the incident. In a separate notice to customers, the company’s chief technology officer, Francisco Fraga, said the stolen data relates to its oncology & multispecialty and medical-surgical units.
The Texas-based company is one of the largest American distributors of pharmaceuticals, medicines, medical supplies, and technology to hospitals and healthcare providers across the United States, and as such handles a large amount of patient data.
The ShinyHunters hacking group — one of the most active data-extortion crews of the past two years — told TechCrunch that it hacked the company’s cloud environment by tricking several employees into granting the hackers’ access to McKesson’s network by using phishing and social engineering tricks, which the group is known for.
The hackers said they stole a range of personal information, such as names, addresses, and Social Security numbers, as well as protected health information, including diagnoses, medications, allergies, and patient notes. The hackers say they took millions of rows of patient data from the company’s cloud-hosted Snowflake and Salesforce environments, but that they are unsure of how many individuals are ultimately affected.
The stolen data also included McKesson employees’ information, such as home addresses.
ShinyHunters shared screenshots and a sample of the stolen data with TechCrunch, and we verified a small subset of it against public records.
Bleeping Computer, which first reported the link to the ShinyHunters hacking group, said the hackers demanded a $55 million ransom from the company in exchange for not publicly releasing the stolen files.
A spokesperson for McKesson did not respond to TechCrunch’s request for comment on Monday.
McKesson is the latest healthcare company or medical device maker to be targeted in a string of cyberattacks in recent months, as hackers aim to steal large amounts of sensitive medical and health data that they can use to extort the companies into paying a ransom to keep it from being published.
Last week, medical device maker Boston Scientific was hit by a cyberattack that knocked much of the company’s network offline. The cyberattack had a similar effect to an incident earlier this year at another medical device maker Stryker, in which hackers abused a company’s internal tools to remotely wipe thousands of employee devices. Abbott Laboratories and Medtronic have also experienced cyberattacks, while electronic patient records provider CareCloud and health tech company TriZetto had breaches affecting over 3 million patients each.
The ShinyHunters hackers have also taken credit for sizable data breaches at Amazon-owned OneMedical and dental insurance company DentaQuest following cyberattacks on their systems.
Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai contributed reporting.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Zack Whittaker is the security editor at TechCrunch. He also authors the weekly cybersecurity newsletter, this week in security.
He can be reached via encrypted message at zackwhittaker.1337 on Signal. You can also contact him by email, or to verify outreach, at [email protected].
Boom kolem AI a datových center se soustředí hlavně na Southern, Duke Energy a American Electric Power, které v XLU nabízejí přímější expozici než celý fond. Southern hlásí 55% meziroční růst využití datových center, Duke 17 GW smluv a AEP 69 GW smluvně zajištěných přírůstků do roku 2030.
XLU gives you exposure to over 30 utilities, but the AI data-center boom is quietly concentrating inside just a handful of them, and owning the fund means paying for a lot of names that will miss the surge entirely.
If you own the Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSEARCA:XLU), you bought it for a reason: cheap, diversified access to America’s regulated utilities, a low beta, and a dividend check that arrives whether the market rallies or rolls over. XLU has done that job for two decades, and its $23.1 billion in net assets says plenty of investors agree. But XLU’s roughly 2.7% yield and 3.78% one-year return understate what is happening inside the sector right now, and three of its own top holdings are the reason.
What XLU Actually Owns, and Why It Dilutes the Story XLU is top-heavy, with NextEra alone making 12.9% of the fund. The next four positions, Southern, Duke, Constellation, and AEP, make up another roughly 25%. The remaining 60% is a long tail of water utilities, gas distributors, and slower-growing regional names like Atmos, CenterPoint, Ameren, and PPL. That tail is what keeps XLU’s yield near the sector average and its earnings growth close to GDP. The AI and data-center demand supercycle is not evenly distributed across those 30-plus holdings. It is concentrated in a handful of them, and you can own those directly.
Southern Company: The Southeast Data-Center Magnet Southern Company (NYSE:SO | SO Price Prediction) yields 3.35% on a forward dividend of $3.04, meaningfully above XLU. More importantly, Q2 adjusted EPS came in at $1.13, and management said data center usage was 55% higher than the prior-year quarter. Georgia Power just signed a 3.2 gigawatt, 25-year contract with OpenAI, and total contracted large-load agreements now exceed 17 gigawatts by the mid-2030s, backed by roughly $21 billion of collateral. Southern has raised its dividend for more than two decades, most recently to $0.76 per quarter. Trading at a 19x forward P/E, it captures the Southeast growth story XLU only partially expresses.
Duke Energy: The Compounding Dividend Machine Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) yields 3.53% and just raised its quarterly payout to $1.085, marking over 20 years of consecutive annual dividend increases. Duke beat consensus for a fifth straight quarter with Q2 adjusted EPS of $1.43, reaffirmed 5% to 7% long-term EPS growth through 2030, and guided to the top half of that range starting in 2028. CEO Harry Sideris said Duke is “deploying more than $1 billion per month” in regulated capital, with 7.8 gigawatts of signed data-center agreements and $5 to $10 billion of upside to the current five-year capital plan. At a 18x forward P/E, you are paying utility multiples for a growth ramp that XLU averages away.
American Electric Power: The Transmission Toll Road American Electric Power (NASDAQ:AEP) is the pure transmission play. Commercial load in its vertically integrated segment jumped 14.9% in Q2, and management raised 2026 EPS guidance to $6.25 to $6.55. The company’s $78 billion five-year capital plan is expected to produce nearly 11% rate-base CAGR, with contracted load additions now at 69 gigawatts through 2030, of which 45 gigawatts sit in ERCOT. AEP yields 3.08% and targets 7% to 9% annual earnings growth, with an expected CAGR above 9% through 2030. That is roughly double what the average XLU holding will deliver.
Tradeoffs You Are Accepting A three-stock sleeve of SO, DUK, and AEP concentrates you in regulated electric utilities in the Southeast, Carolinas/Midwest/Florida, and 11-state AEP footprint. You lose XLU’s exposure to water, gas distribution, and independent power producers like Vistra and Constellation. You take on single-state regulatory risk, and you have to rebalance yourself. With the 10-year Treasury at 4.67%, none of these yields dominate risk-free income, so the case rests on dividend growth plus rate-base compounding, not on income alone.
How to Think About the Switch In a tax-advantaged account, rotating out of XLU into an equal-weight basket of SO, DUK, and AEP is a clean trade: no capital-gains friction, higher blended yield, and direct exposure to the load-growth names already inside XLU. In a taxable account, weigh embedded gains from XLU’s 139% ten-year run before selling; a partial rotation, funded with new capital rather than a full liquidation, often makes more sense. If you want XLU’s diversification and defensive character above all else, stay put. If you want the AI power-demand tailwind expressed at full strength, the three names are already sitting in your ETF, just diluted, and the same buildout is pulling in the cooling, networking, and equipment suppliers we profiled in a free report on seven AI infrastructure stocks that aren’t chipmakers.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Baird zvýšil hodnocení Deere i AGCO na Outperform kvůli očekávanému oživení objemů po row crop technice v Severní Americe v roce 2027. Deere i AGCO po zprávě vzrostly o 4 %.
Baird just handed two farm equipment stocks a rare double upgrade on the same morning, but the reasoning behind each call points to a very different bet on how the ag cycle turns.
Farm equipment stocks caught a bid Monday afternoon after Baird upgraded both Deere (NYSE:DE | DE Price Prediction) and AGCO (NYSE:AGCO) on North America row crop demand. The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) is down 0.5% to $765.91, which frames the ag machinery rally as a targeted rotation into agricultural equipment while the broader industrials bid stays absent. The upgrade note argues that a 2027 volume recovery is coming from a cyclical trough, and both stocks are rallying on that call.
Deere stock is up 4% to $653.78 in midday trading. Through Friday’s close, Deere stock was up 36% year to date, so today’s pop extends a run that had already priced in a healthier ag equipment setup.
Meanwhile, AGCO stock is rallying 4% to $118.11. AGCO stock was up 10% year to date, a much smaller advance that leaves more room for a recovery thesis to still get paid at these levels.
Baird’s Double Upgrade on North America Row Crop Demand Baird upgraded Deere to Outperform from Neutral and raised its price target to $800 from $640, calling Deere the “cleanest setup” in the sector given its high exposure to North America row crop equipment demand. That target sits well above the current sell-side consensus target of $665.35 and anchors the analyst’s view that a fiscal 2027 volume recovery arrives on schedule.
Additionally, Baird upgraded AGCO to Outperform from Neutral with a price target of $150, raised from $120, arguing that any North America volume recovery in 2027 should flow straight to AGCO’s bottom line from a low base. The reasoning centers on operating leverage, with no valuation rerating in the thesis, and the new target sits above the AGCO sell-side consensus of $122.47.
Fellow large-cap machinery name Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) provides a natural comparison as another North America equipment bellwether, though its construction-heavy customer base sits well apart from Deere’s and AGCO’s row crop end market. That distinction is why a note anchored on row crop demand pulls the two ag names higher without lifting the broader machinery complex today.
Two Upgrades, Two Different Theses Deere’s setup rests on quality and direct exposure. Deere is the incumbent in North America high-horsepower row crop equipment, and Baird is arguing the recovery arrives on a stock the market has already awarded a premium multiple. Deere stock trades at a trailing P/E of 34.6x, which prices in a clean cycle turn.
AGCO’s setup rests on operating leverage. Any 2027 North America volume recovery converts to outsized bottom-line movement from a depressed earnings base, and AGCO stock trades at a trailing P/E of 15.34x. A lower base paired with a lower multiple is the mechanical reason the same catalyst can move both names on the same day.
The year-to-date returns show how the market has already separated the two names. Deere stock’s 36% run reflects investors paying for the North America row crop recovery ahead of time, while AGCO stock’s 10% run indicates the recovery has yet to be priced in at AGCO.
Bear Case for Both Names An $800 price target on Deere implies the North America row crop recovery arrives on schedule, and farm equipment demand ultimately turns on crop prices and farmer income. Deere’s premium valuation after a 36% year-to-date run offers little room to absorb a delayed recovery, particularly with the stock trading close to its 52-week high of $670.49.
AGCO carries an inverted risk profile. Its lower base leaves more cushion if the recovery slips, yet no earnings floor exists to defend on the way down if farm income disappoints. Investors can weigh Deere’s quality premium against AGCO’s operating leverage on the same recovery outcome.
What to Watch Traders can watch for whether Deere stock holds $650 as follow-on notes from other sell-side desks either extend or fade the move. Baird’s $800 target implies further upside that momentum traders may press if commodity headlines cooperate.
The next real data points sit outside the trading window. Farm income prints, crop price action, and early order program commentary from the manufacturers themselves carry more weight than a single upgrade note, and any recovery timing miss hits both names, just with different geometry between quality and operating leverage.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Dycom očekává, že výstavba v rámci BEAD se naplno rozběhne v kalendářním roce 2027, přičemž odhadovaný adresovatelný trh činí zhruba 17 miliard USD. Firma zároveň uvedla, že výnosy z fiber-to-the-home v první polovině fiskálního roku 2027 vzrostly téměř o 60 %.
Key Takeaways Dycom expects BEAD construction to begin in earnest in 2027 after modest engineering activity this year.Dycom estimates a roughly $17 billion BEAD addressable market, though funding and rules could alter it.Dycom's fiber-to-the-home revenues rose nearly 60% in fiscal 2027's first half, adding another growth driver. Dycom Industries’ (DY - Free Report) exposure to the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment, or BEAD, program could become a more meaningful growth catalyst in calendar 2027 as federally backed broadband construction begins to move beyond the planning stage.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2027 call, management said that Dycom recognized BEAD-related field-engineering revenues in the Northeast. Engineering activity should remain relatively modest through the back half of the current fiscal year, with construction expected to begin in earnest during calendar 2027, corresponding largely with fiscal 2028.
The potential opportunity is sizable. Dycom previously estimated a roughly $17 billion addressable market tied to BEAD. Management cautioned that the ultimate figure could change as funding allocations and program requirements evolve, but it remains confident that BEAD represents incremental upside for its portfolio.
Importantly, BEAD would add another growth driver alongside already-strong fiber demand. Dycom’s fiber-to-the-home revenues increased nearly 60% in the first half of fiscal 2027, while customers continue to reaffirm their multi-year build plans. The company also has roughly 17,000 Communications employees, giving it workforce scale as broadband construction accelerates.
The main uncertainty remains timing, as BEAD construction depends on program approvals and local execution. Still, Dycom’s existing fiber capabilities, national footprint and early engineering work leave it well positioned to capture a meaningful share once deployments accelerate.
Dycom Versus Key Rivals in the BEAD OpportunityMasTec (MTZ - Free Report) is one of Dycom’s closest peers in broadband construction, with a communications business spanning wireline/fiber and wireless infrastructure. MasTec remains constructive on fiber expansion and broadband infrastructure, though its latest quarter showed near-term wireline project deferrals and weaker Communications expectations. That contrast could favor Dycom if BEAD construction ramps faster in 2027, while MasTec’s scale and customer relationships still make it a meaningful rival.
Primoris Services (PRIM - Free Report) is another relevant competitor because its communications operations include fiber plant construction, splicing, maintenance, engineering and project management. Primoris also markets dedicated BEAD planning and construction capabilities. However, Primoris reported lower activity in its communications business during the second quarter of 2026, even as companywide backlog reached a record $13.9 billion. MasTec and Primoris show that Dycom faces credible competition for BEAD-funded work, making workforce availability and execution important differentiators.
DY Stock’s Price Performance & Valuation TrendShares of this specialty contracting firm have plunged 12.9% year to date, underperforming the Zacks Building Products - Heavy Construction industry, as shown below.
Dycom Price Performance (YTD)
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
DY stock is currently trading at a discount compared with its industry peers, with a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 15.74, as shown in the chart below.
Dycom Valuation (P/E F12M)
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Earnings Estimate Trend of DycomDycom’s earnings estimates for fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 have trended upward in the past 30 days to $16.65 per share and $20.19 per share, respectively. The estimated figures for fiscal 2027 and fiscal 2028 imply year-over-year growth of 39.1% and 21.3%, respectively.
SEI Investments (SEIC) během pátečního obchodování dosáhla nového 52týdenního maxima 112,15 USD. Tržby v první polovině roku 2026 vzrostly meziročně o 14 % a aktiva pod správou, dohledem a administrací dosáhla 2,1 bilionu USD.
Key Takeaways SEIC hits a new 52-week high of $112.15, with revenues and client assets increasing in the first half of 2026.SEI Investments is benefiting from sales conversion, technology demand, and improving LSV asset flows.Premium valuation and elevated investment spending could limit upside if growth or market conditions weaken. SEI Investments Company (SEIC - Free Report) shares touched a new 52-week high of $112.15 during Friday’s trading session before closing at $111.63, slightly below the session's peak.
Over the past six months, shares of SEIC have jumped 35.6% compared with the industry's increase of 12%. Additionally, its close peers, Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. (VCTR - Free Report) and Blue Owl Capital (OWL - Free Report) , have gained 71.5% and 12.6%, respectively, over the same period.
6-Month Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Does SEI Investments stock have more upside left after recently touching its 52-week high? Let us find out.
Factors Aiding SEIC’s StockBroad-Based Growth and Expanding Client Assets: SEI Investments has delivered sustained top-line growth through expanding client assets, outsourcing demand, strategic partnerships, and targeted acquisitions. Revenues witnessed a 6.4% CAGR from 2020 through 2025 and rose 14% year over year during the first half of 2026.
Investment Managers' revenues rose 16.02% year over year in the first half of 2026 as prior sales success converted into revenues, while Investment Advisors' revenues increased 27%, benefiting from higher market values and the Stratos contribution.
Total assets under management, advisement, and administration saw a 9.3% CAGR over the same period, with the metric touching $2.1 trillion as of June 30, 2026. SEIC is also expanding into private markets through strategic partnerships and capabilities across wealth and retirement channels. Management expects the movement of private assets into these channels to generate more than $100 million of annual run-rate revenues within five years. These initiatives are expected to diversify the company's revenue base, with the Zacks Consensus Estimate projecting sales growth of 12.59% for 2026 and 7.91% for 2027.
Sales Estimate
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Technology, Outsourcing and Sales Conversion Strength: Technology remains central to SEI Investments’ competitive position. Its Investment Processing platform delivers outsourced software and processing services through TRUST 3000 and SEI Wealth Platform. Revenues from these platforms witnessed a 7.3% CAGR over the five years ended 2025, with the growth continuing in the first half of 2026. Demand is being supported by financial institutions and investment managers seeking to modernize operations and redirect resources toward growth.
SEIC is strengthening its platform through Data Cloud, automation, AI, and professional services. Strong sales activity supports this strategy, with IMS generating $32 million of sales events in the second quarter, driven by new client wins and expanded relationships. Approximately three-quarters of IMS sales events were associated with alternative investment mandates, supporting continued revenue growth and operating leverage.
SEIC’s Sales Momentum Remains Strong
Image Source: SEI Investments Company
LSV Contribution and Improving Asset Flows: SEI Investments' partnership interest in LSV Asset Management continues to support earnings, with improved asset flows and market appreciation providing a more constructive backdrop. LSV’s earnings remain sensitive to market conditions and client flows, resulting in volatility in recent years. Earnings declined in 2022 and 2025 due to client outflows, market depreciation and client losses, but improved in 2021, 2023 and 2024 on market appreciation.
The second-quarter performance highlights an improving trend, with LSV generating approximately $2 billion of net inflows from a large new mandate and performance fees totaling approximately $17 million, of which $6.5 million was attributable to SEI Investments. LSV products continued to outperform relevant benchmarks, while the improved flow profile is likely to provide a more constructive backdrop for the company’s equity income contribution.
Strong Liquidity and Financial Flexibility: SEI Investments maintains ample liquidity relative to its debt obligations, with cash and cash equivalents of $395.7 million as of June 30, 2026, with approximately $29 million of long-term debt. Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $347.4 million in the first half of 2026 from $243 million a year earlier, providing flexibility to fund technology initiatives, product development, acquisitions and shareholder distributions while supporting multiple growth initiatives without relying heavily on leverage.
SEIC Maintains Strong Liquidity and Low Debt
Image Source: SEI Investments Company
Disciplined Capital Returns: SEI Investments continues to return capital to shareholders while funding growth initiatives, raising its semi-annual dividend by 6.1% in December 2025 following a 6.5% increase in December 2024. As of June 30, 2026, $383.1 million remained under its repurchase authorization. The company expects cash flow to support higher repurchase activity, driven by its low leverage and recurring revenue profile.
Concerns for SEI InvestmentsSEI Investments’ continued investments in technology, AI, automation, Data Cloud, SaaS expansion, product development and Stratos integration are supporting long-term growth but also increasing operating costs and execution risks. If revenue growth, sales conversion, or client demand slows, these elevated investments could pressure margins and profitability.
In addition, a meaningful portion of revenues remains sensitive to market values and client flows, while flat combined net flows in Advisors and Institutional highlight potential pressure from weaker markets or outflows. The growing adoption of lower-fee products, including ETFs and separately managed accounts, could further moderate fee growth and limit earnings growth.
SEIC’s Earnings Estimates and Valuation AnalysisAnalysts remain bullish on SEIC’s earnings growth prospects. The Zacks Consensus Estimate implies continued earnings growth through 2026 and 2027, with earnings projected to increase from $5.63 per share in 2025 to $6.20 in 2026 and $6.86 in 2027. This outlook reflects recurring earnings beats and stronger operating results, supported by sales conversion, margin gains, alternative-investment demand and contributions from Stratos and LSV.
Earnings Estimate
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
In terms of its valuation, SEI Investments stock is currently trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 16.82, compared with the industry average of 14.18. This indicates that SEIC is currently trading at a premium to its industry.
Price-to-Earnings F12M
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
SEI Investments' premium valuation leaves less room for disappointment. This is particularly relevant as the investment case depends on continued pipeline conversion, margin discipline and growth from initiatives such as Stratos, AI-enabled automation, retail alternatives, and alternatives in retirement. Slower sales conversion, weaker asset values or lower-than-expected returns from these initiatives could narrow the valuation premium and limit upside potential.
SEI Investments trades at a premium to Blue Owl Capital and Victoria Capital. At present, Blue Owl Capital and Victoria Capital have a forward 12-month P/E of 12.62X and 14.97X, respectively.
Parting Thoughts on SEI InvestmentsSEI Investments’ strong asset growth, expanding outsourcing platform, technology investments, LSV contributions and growing private-markets exposure are expected to support long-term growth. Its strong balance sheet, disciplined capital returns and improving earnings outlook underscore financial flexibility and a shareholder-friendly approach. The company’s diversified growth initiatives also provide multiple avenues for sustained revenue and earnings expansion.
Though fee sensitivity, elevated investment spending and premium valuation remain near-term concerns, SEI Investments’ solid growth prospects, recurring revenues and strong financial position support a favorable long-term outlook.
The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Balancer varoval poskytovatele likvidity, aby okamžitě stáhli prostředky z zastaralých V1 poolů kvůli chybě, která může vyčerpat fondy likvidity. SlowMist odhadl jeden útok na zhruba 234 000 USD.
Balancer said the deprecated pools are non-pausable, while SlowMist attributed a roughly $234,000 V1 drain to a fixed-point rounding flaw.
Balancer warned liquidity providers on Aug. 31 to withdraw from its legacy V1 pools after saying it was aware of a bug that allows LP funds to be drained. The protocol said the deprecated pools are non-pausable, leaving users — rather than a protocol-initiated pause — as the immediate line of defense.
Balancer directed users to exit proportionally through its legacy withdrawal interface and said its other products are not affected. The instruction applies to LPs who still hold positions in the old contracts.
Balancer's warning did not state how much value remained in the affected pools or publish their addresses. The withdrawal site asks users to connect a wallet or enter an address to scan for positions, and it permits a pool address to be added manually.
Rounding Flaw Preceded the WarningBlockchain security firm SlowMist separately estimated that one Balancer V1 pool lost roughly $234,000. It attributed the drain to fixed-point rounding in the `joinswapPoolAmountOut` path, which lets a caller specify a Balancer Pool Token output while the contract calculates the required asset input.
SlowMist said the attacker compressed the pool's WBTC reserve to dust before the calculation rounded the required input down to one satoshi of WBTC while still minting the requested pool tokens. The firm said those tokens were then exited proportionally to drain DPI, USDC, WETH and WBTC from the pool.
Balancer's public exit-interface documentation says the tool scans positions against a bundled pool list and supports proportional exits from V1 core and smart pools. If a pool is missing from the scan, the documentation says users can add it by pasting its address.
Robinhood Chain dosáhl rekordního objemu DEX ve výši 875 milionů USD a 5,52 milionu denních transakcí. Příjmy z aplikace za 24 hodin činily 2,66 milionu USD a překonaly Ethereum i Hyperliquid L1.
TLDR: Robinhood Chain’s DEX trading volume hit a record $875 million on August 30, led by Uniswap v4. Daily transactions on Robinhood Chain reached 5.52 million, an all-time high for the network. Pons, the top launchpad on Robinhood Chain, minted 22,600 tokens and $187 million in volume. Robinhood Chain’s 24-hour app revenue of $2.66 million topped Ethereum and Hyperliquid L1. Robinhood Chain recorded its strongest day of on-chain activity on August 30, with decentralized exchange volume reaching $875 million.
The Wu Blockchain Data Center reported that daily transactions on Robinhood Chain hit 5.52 million, a new all-time high.
Uniswap v4 and Uniswap v3 accounted for most of the trading volume, while Pons, the network’s leading token launchpad, also posted record numbers. The figures point to expanding activity across the Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
DEX Volume and Daily Transactions Set New Records Uniswap v4 generated $432 million in trading volume on Robinhood Chain during the record session. Uniswap v3 followed closely behind, contributing $357 million to the day’s total activity.
Together, the two versions accounted for the bulk of the $875 million recorded across Robinhood Chain’s decentralized exchanges that day.
According to Wu Blockchain Data Center, Robinhood Chain’s DEX volume reached a record high of $875 million on August 30, with Uniswap v4 contributing $432 million and Uniswap v3 $357 million.… pic.twitter.com/WQZI5s9Egn
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) August 31, 2026
Beyond DEX trading, the network processed 5.52 million transactions within a single 24-hour window, surpassing all previous totals.
This transaction count reflects rising participation from traders, bots, and applications built on top of Robinhood Chain. Wu Blockchain shared the figures through its data center, noting the milestone alongside the DEX volume record.
Pons, the largest token launchpad operating on Robinhood Chain, also reported record figures on the same day. The platform saw 22,600 tokens created within 24 hours, alongside $187 million in trading volume passing through it. Both metrics marked new highs for the launchpad since it began operating on the network.
App Revenue Tops Ethereum, Hyperliquid L1, and Base Robinhood Chain generated $2.66 million in app revenue over a 24-hour period, according to DeFiLlama data. This figure surpassed Hyperliquid L1’s $1.7 million and Ethereum’s $1.27 million recorded during the same window.
Robinhood Chain’s revenue also stood at nearly six times that of Base, which brought in $438,436 over the same period.
GMGN led revenue generation among protocols operating on Robinhood Chain, bringing in $1.11 million for the day. Pons followed with $930,587 in revenue, while Uniswap contributed $306,877 to the network’s daily total.
Combined, these three protocols accounted for close to 88 percent of all app revenue generated on Robinhood Chain.
The revenue breakdown shows a concentration of earnings among a small group of protocols on Robinhood Chain.
GMGN, Pons, and Uniswap remain the top three contributors to daily earnings on the network, based on DeFiLlama’s tracking. DeFiLlama continues to update these rankings as on-chain revenue data shifts across competing networks.
Together, the DEX volume, transaction count, and revenue figures paint a picture of a single record-setting day for Robinhood Chain.
Wu Blockchain and DeFiLlama both logged the milestones through their respective data platforms on August 30. The numbers place Robinhood Chain ahead of several established networks across multiple activity metrics for that period.
Float Protocol přišel zhruba o 28 000 USD (10,71 ETH), když útočník přes flash loan manipuloval spotovou cenou Uniswap V3 a zneužil výpočet hodnoty LP podílů v Hypervisor kontraktech.
Float Protocol has lost about $28,000, or 10.71 ETH, after an attacker used a flash loan to manipulate a Uniswap V3 spot price and exploit how its Hypervisor contracts calculated liquidity provider share values.
Summary
Float Protocol lost about $28,000, or 10.71 ETH, after a flash loan attack manipulated a Uniswap V3 spot price. SlowMist said the manipulation caused affected Hypervisor contracts to calculate inflated LP share values. The attacker used large swaps to distort currentTick() and getTotalAmounts(), then repeatedly deposited and withdrew against the incorrect values. SlowMist said critical functions lacked TWAP or oracle verification and slippage protection. SlowMist said on Aug. 31 that the attacker distorted the Uniswap V3 slot0 spot price, causing affected Hypervisor contracts to calculate incorrect LP share values. The blockchain security firm traced the exploit to functions that lacked TWAP or oracle verification and slippage protection.
🚨SlowMist TI Alert🚨
💰 @FloatProtocol Loss: ~$28,000 (10.71 ETH)
🔍 Root Cause: Uniswap V3 spot price (`slot0`) manipulation via flash loans enabled incorrect LP share pricing in Hypervisor contracts. Critical functions lacked TWAP/oracle validation and slippage protection.…
— SlowMist (@SlowMist_Team) August 31, 2026 Using large swaps in the underlying V3 liquidity pool, the attacker manipulated the values returned by currentTick() and getTotalAmounts(). SlowMist said the attacker then repeatedly deposited and withdrew funds while the Hypervisor contracts were working with inflated share values.
The security firm identified the attacker address as 0xaea29218262dc6b0904ca077f6527c49dfd426d9 and the attack contract as 0xb46655eb5b77de277063a75586d1883e951b6c54.
Two vulnerable contracts were listed as 0x85cbed523459b7f6f81c11e710df969703a8a70c and 0xc86b1e7fa86834cac1468937cdd53ba3ccbc1153, while the underlying liquidity pool was identified as 0xe8c2036068fc3b0161ee1def0e8d01df4eac0ac.
Float Protocol exploit relied on Uniswap V3 spot price manipulation The attack centered on how the affected contracts obtained pricing information from the underlying Uniswap V3 pool. SlowMist said large trades allowed the attacker to distort slot0, which contains the pool’s current price and tick information.
Once the pool price had been moved, the manipulation changed the values returned by currentTick() and getTotalAmounts(). The affected Hypervisor contracts used the altered data to calculate LP share values, which allowed the attacker to interact with the contracts while those shares were incorrectly priced.
Flash loans supplied the temporary capital needed to make the large trades. As crypto.news previously explained, a flash loan allows assets to be borrowed without upfront collateral as long as the loan and fees are repaid within the same blockchain transaction.
If repayment does not occur, the entire transaction reverts. The mechanism allows traders to access large amounts of temporary liquidity for arbitrage, collateral swaps and liquidations, but the same liquidity can be used to exploit vulnerable pricing or smart contract logic.
In its analysis of Float Protocol, SlowMist attributed the loss to the contracts relying on a manipulable spot price without checks that could verify it against a time weighted average price or another oracle. Critical functions lacked slippage protection as well, according to the security firm.
Attacker repeatedly used inflated LP share values SlowMist said the attacker did not stop after changing the Uniswap V3 pool price. Once slot0 had been distorted, the attacker repeatedly deposited into and withdrew from the affected contracts using the inflated LP share calculations.
The sequence allowed value to be extracted while the contracts were relying on the manipulated pool state. SlowMist estimated the final loss at approximately 10.71 ETH, worth about $28,000 when it published the alert.
Similar methods have been used in other DeFi attacks where large temporary trades distort prices or pool ratios before another contract uses the manipulated values.
In July, Allbridge Core was halted after an attacker used a $1.12 million USDC flash loan from Kamino during an exploit that PeckShield estimated caused about $1.65 million in losses.
Onchain Lens said the Allbridge attacker made rapid USDC and USDT swaps to change the ratio inside a stablecoin pool. The attacker then withdrew liquidity at the distorted rate before repaying the flash loan in the same transaction.
Allbridge said some liquidity pools were left temporarily out of balance after the incident and asked users who had profited from unusual pricing to consider returning the funds. The protocol paused Core while investigators tracked assets that had been moved from Solana to Ethereum.
Price data has remained a target in DeFi attacks Another July incident showed how manipulated pricing information can be used even when the weakness sits outside a protocol’s smart contracts.
Ostium concluded that its $23.75 million USDC exploit originated from compromised off-chain infrastructure. The decentralized trading protocol said an attacker submitted fraudulent BTC/USD price reports that allowed funds to be drained from its OLP liquidity vault.
Ostium said its smart contracts were not the source of that breach. Automated monitoring detected the attack, trading resumed on July 23, and the protocol reported that user collateral had not been affected.
Float Protocol’s incident involved a different mechanism described by SlowMist. The security firm’s analysis placed the weakness inside the affected Hypervisor contracts, where manipulated Uniswap V3 pool data could influence the calculations used to value LP shares.
Flash-loan capital has featured in other attacks this year. A July attack against Swan Treasury used a PancakeSwap flash loan after a compromised off-chain signer key allowed an attacker to purchase STY tokens at a large discount.
The Swan Treasury exploit caused an estimated $625,000 loss. Security analysis found that forged claim and transfer signatures had been created with the protocol’s compromised signer key, allowing roughly 687,000 STY to be purchased at around a 100 times discount before being sold into the STY/USDT pool.
The flash loan supplied capital for the transaction, while investigators attributed the underlying vulnerability to the leaked signer key instead of the protocol’s signature verification logic.
SlowMist points to missing price checks in Float Protocol contracts For Float Protocol, SlowMist specifically identified the absence of TWAP or oracle validation as part of the attack path.
A TWAP uses observations collected across a period instead of relying solely on the price available at one moment. Spot prices inside liquidity pools can move when a sufficiently large trade changes the ratio of assets, which was the mechanism SlowMist said the Float Protocol attacker exploited.
Crypto.news’ flash loan guide described price manipulation as one of the common ways temporary liquidity can be used against a vulnerable DeFi application. The report noted that the flash loan provides the capital for an attack while the exploitable weakness can lie in price oracles, governance systems or contract logic.
In Float Protocol’s case, SlowMist said large trades were used to distort the Uniswap V3 pool’s slot0 value, which in turn changed currentTick() and getTotalAmounts(). The attacker repeatedly deposited and withdrew while the affected Hypervisor contracts calculated inflated LP share values, resulting in an estimated loss of 10.71 ETH.
Commercial Metals zvýšila upravenou EBITDA v prvních devíti měsících fiskálního roku 2026 o 77,3 % na 968 mil. USD. Firma zároveň cílí na 1,65–1,80 mld. USD v roce 2029.
Key Takeaways CMC's core EBITDA jumped 77.3% y/y to $968M in the first nine months of FY26.The acquired precast businesses contributed $52.9M to adjusted EBITDA in Q3.CMC targets FY29 core EBITDA of $1.65B-$1.80B and margins of 15-16%. Commercial Metals Company’s (CMC - Free Report) core EBITDA surged 77.3% year over year to $968 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2026, driven by metal margin expansion and contributions from the recently acquired precast businesses. The core EBITDA margin reached 14.4% in the same time frame compared with the prior year’s 9.6%.
Backed by healthy domestic demand, strong backlogs and ongoing benefits from strategic initiatives, CMC expects core EBITDA to further increase sequentially in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026.
CMC closed two major acquisitions in December 2025 — Concrete Pipe and Precast, LLC ("CP&P") and Foley Products Company. The acquired businesses add manufactured concrete pipe and structures used in job-site infrastructure, boosting Commercial Metals’ early-stage construction offering beyond steel and geotechnical solutions. In the third quarter of fiscal 2026, the precast business contributed $52.9 million to adjusted EBITDA. The company expects the precast platform to generate $165-$175 million of EBITDA in fiscal 2026, with incremental annualized EBITDA of $240-$250 million and $30-$40 million of annualized synergies by the end of year three.
Commercial Metals is also benefiting from its Transform, Advance, Grow (“TAG”) Program, which focuses on driving higher through-the-cycle margins, earnings, cash flows and ROIC. CMC expects an annualized EBITDA benefit of more than $250 million in fiscal 2026 and more than $350 million by fiscal 2027 from the program.
On Aug. 5, Commercial Metals introduced its fiscal 2029 financial targets. Backed by its focus on transformation, the company expects to generate structurally higher margins and enhanced free cash flow. CMC expects its fiscal 2029 core EBITDA to be $1.65-$1.80 billion, suggesting a surge of 106% at mid-point from the $837 million delivered in 2025. The core EBITDA margin is expected to be 15-16%.
EBITDA Performance by Commercial Metals’ PeersSteel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD - Free Report) reported adjusted EBITDA of $1.62 billion in the first six months of 2026, marking a year-over-year increase of 65.1%. Steel Dynamics remains optimistic that domestic steel and aluminum consumption will stay strong through the remainder of 2026 and into 2027. The upside will be supported by improving customer sentiment, stronger order activity, better pricing, domestic trade actions, manufacturing reshoring and infrastructure investments. Steel Dynamics’s strategic investments are projected to boost the company's consolidated annual EBITDA by $650-$700 million.
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF - Free Report) posted adjusted EBITDA of $381 million in the first six months of 2026 against a loss of 85 million in the prior year. Cleveland-Cliffs expects third-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA of $575 million, more than double the second-quarter results. Cleveland-Cliffs also expects fourth-quarter EBITDA to exceed its third-quarter guidance as average selling prices, shipment volumes and costs continue to move in a favorable direction.
CMC’s Price Performance, Valuations & EstimatesCommercial Metals shares have gained 18.3% in the past year compared with the industry’s 73.4% growth. In comparison, the Zacks Basic Materials sector and the S&P 500 have returned 34.6% and 23%, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Commercial Metals is currently trading at a forward price/sales ratio of 0.76 compared with the industry's 1.85.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Commercial Metals’ fiscal 2026 sales is $9.18 billion, indicating a 17.7% year-over-year jump. The consensus mark for the year’s earnings is pegged at $6.64 per share, indicating a year-over-year upsurge of 112.1%.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for fiscal 2027 sales implies 7.6% year-over-year growth. The same for earnings suggests a dip of 9.6%.
EPS estimates for fiscal 2026 and 2027 have moved north over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CMC currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ve 2. čtvrtletí snížila svůj podíl ve společnosti Leidos o 38,4 % a prodala 17 803 akcií. Po prodeji držela 28 600 akcií v hodnotě 2 945 000 USD.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board trimmed its holdings in Leidos Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:LDOS – Free Report) by 38.4% during the second quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm owned 28,600 shares of the aerospace company’s stock after selling 17,803 shares during the quarter. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s holdings in Leidos were worth $2,945,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Several other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently made changes to their positions in LDOS. BlackRock Inc. bought a new stake in Leidos in the second quarter worth approximately $1,024,436,000. State Street Corp boosted its holdings in shares of Leidos by 3.7% during the 4th quarter. State Street Corp now owns 6,022,359 shares of the aerospace company’s stock worth $1,086,434,000 after buying an additional 217,141 shares in the last quarter. Diamant Asset Management Inc. boosted its holdings in shares of Leidos by 16,475.4% during the 1st quarter. Diamant Asset Management Inc. now owns 4,156,784 shares of the aerospace company’s stock worth $646,463,000 after buying an additional 4,131,706 shares in the last quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC grew its position in shares of Leidos by 1.9% during the 4th quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 3,538,488 shares of the aerospace company’s stock worth $636,097,000 after buying an additional 64,909 shares during the period. Finally, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP grew its position in shares of Leidos by 2.6% during the 1st quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 1,859,616 shares of the aerospace company’s stock worth $289,193,000 after buying an additional 47,542 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 76.12% of the company’s stock.
Insider Transactions at Leidos In related news, Director Noel B. Geer sold 10,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, August 11th. The stock was sold at an average price of $140.66, for a total transaction of $1,406,600.00. Following the completion of the sale, the director owned 34,274 shares in the company, valued at approximately $4,820,980.84. This represents a 22.59% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this link. Company insiders own 0.77% of the company’s stock.
Leidos Price Performance Shares of NYSE LDOS opened at $140.59 on Monday. Leidos Holdings, Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $98.86 and a fifty-two week high of $205.77. The stock has a market cap of $17.64 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 13.11, a PEG ratio of 2.05 and a beta of 0.52. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.13, a quick ratio of 1.60 and a current ratio of 1.63. The firm’s 50-day simple moving average is $119.90 and its 200 day simple moving average is $139.03. Leidos (NYSE:LDOS – Get Free Report) last issued its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, August 4th. The aerospace company reported $3.26 EPS for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.91 by $0.35. The firm had revenue of $4.56 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $4.44 billion. Leidos had a return on equity of 30.81% and a net margin of 7.80%.The company’s revenue for the quarter was up 7.2% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the previous year, the company posted $3.21 EPS. Leidos has set its FY 2026 guidance at 12.200-12.500 EPS. As a group, research analysts anticipate that Leidos Holdings, Inc. will post 12.38 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.
Leidos announced that its board has initiated a stock buyback program on Friday, July 31st that permits the company to repurchase 20,000,000 shares. This repurchase authorization permits the aerospace company to buy shares of its stock through open market purchases. Stock repurchase programs are generally an indication that the company’s board of directors believes its stock is undervalued.
Leidos Dividend Announcement The business also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Wednesday, September 30th. Investors of record on Tuesday, September 15th will be given a dividend of $0.43 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, September 15th. This represents a $1.72 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 1.2%. Leidos’s payout ratio is presently 16.04%.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth LDOS has been the subject of several research analyst reports. Royal Bank Of Canada lowered their price objective on shares of Leidos from $180.00 to $170.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research note on Wednesday, August 5th. BNP Paribas Exane raised their price target on shares of Leidos from $165.00 to $175.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a report on Wednesday, August 5th. Wells Fargo & Company set a $165.00 price target on shares of Leidos in a research note on Monday, August 17th. TD Cowen upped their price objective on shares of Leidos from $115.00 to $135.00 and gave the company a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, August 7th. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. cut their price objective on shares of Leidos from $210.00 to $160.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a research report on Monday, July 13th. One research analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, six have assigned a Buy rating and ten have assigned a Hold rating to the company’s stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Leidos currently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $162.93.
Check Out Our Latest Analysis on Leidos
Leidos Company Profile (Free Report)
Leidos is an American technology and engineering company that provides services and solutions to government and commercial customers, with a strong focus on national security, defense, intelligence, and civil government markets. The company delivers systems integration, engineering, cybersecurity, software development, data analytics, cloud migration and managed IT services, as well as mission support for complex programs. Leidos’ work spans areas such as C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance), secure communications, sensors and systems engineering, and health IT solutions for public-sector healthcare programs.
Leidos traces its corporate roots to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and emerged as an independent, publicly traded company following a corporate separation in 2013.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Leidos Strike a Balance Between Growth and Stability With These 3 Names Ready to Rally Rubrik’s AI Security Bet Could Power the Next Leg Higher Apple’s Foldable iPhone Could Be a Catalyst, But Not a Cure-All Snowflake Is Up Nearly 50% in 2026—What Are Short Sellers Betting Against?
Receive News & Ratings for Leidos Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Leidos and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Guarda Wallet přidal nativní podporu Terra Classic ($LUNC), takže držitelé mohou token ukládat, posílat a přijímat bez centralizované burzy. Zůstává jim plná kontrola nad privátními klíči.
@GuardaWallet has added native support for Terra Classic ($LUNC), giving holders of the community-run token a non-custodial option to manage their assets without relying on a centralised exchange.
What the Integration Offers The addition of native $LUNC support means holders can now save, transfer, and receive the token while retaining sole control of their private keys. That matters in practice: keeping assets off centralised platforms removes exposure to exchange-side custody risk, a concern that became acute for many Terra holders after the ecosystem's collapse in 2022.
Burn Campaign and On-Chain Activity The Guarda integration arrives as the Terra Classic community pushes through a meaningful shift in its deflationary strategy.
Exchange-led burns are adding to that pressure.
Despite the pace of burns, the scale of the task remains large.
For Terra Classic holders looking to move assets off exchanges amid these developments, the Guarda integration adds a straightforward, self-custody route to do so.
Sources:
Guarda Wallet: Terra Classic (LUNC) Wallet
CoinMarketCap: Terra Classic Latest Updates
CoinReporter: Binance June 2026 LUNC Burn
Okta těží z rostoucí poptávky po bezpečnosti AI: nové produkty tvořily ve 2. čtvrtletí fiskálního roku 2027 zhruba 30 % objednávek a přinesly asi 40% růst ACV. Firma zároveň rozšiřuje ochranu pro AI agenty a nelidské identity.
Key Takeaways Okta is expanding AI security for agents and non-human identities as enterprise demand grows.New products drove about 30% of fiscal Q2 2027 bookings, with roughly 40% average ACV uplift.Okta is expanding through AI-agent deals, acquisitions and partnerships amid tougher competition. Okta (OKTA - Free Report) is benefiting from growing enterprise demand for Artificial Intelligence (AI) security and an expanding identity-security portfolio. The company is extending its platform beyond employees and customers to AI agents and other non-human identities as enterprises rapidly deploy agentic applications. Okta’s offerings include Okta for AI Agents, Auth0 for AI Agents, Identity Threat Protection, Identity Security Posture Management, Privileged Access and Fine-Grained Authorization. These capabilities strengthen Okta’s position against broader security competitors, including CrowdStrike (CRWD - Free Report) and Microsoft (MSFT - Free Report) .
New-product adoption is already supporting bookings and customer spending. In the second quarter of fiscal 2027, newer products accounted for roughly 30% of bookings, led by Okta Identity Governance. Deals incorporating new products generated an average annual contract value (ACV) growth of about 40%. Okta closed dozens of AI-agent deals, including several million-dollar-plus transactions. OKTA noted that AI-related deal sizes remain above the company-wide average, although AI contributions are still too small to materially affect overall revenues.
Rapid AI-agent proliferation could support further demand. In one customer evaluation, Okta initially detected roughly 50 Claude-agent instances, but the number increased to around 1,500 within a few weeks. Such rapid proliferation increases enterprises’ need to discover, govern and secure agents. Okta has already secured a multimillion-dollar AI Agents deal with a Fortune 50 healthcare company, while a global consulting firm selected the platform after considering an internal build. One of the world’s largest asset managers selected Okta to govern thousands of agents from multiple vendors, highlighting the appeal of its vendor-neutral architecture.
Okta is strengthening its capabilities through acquisitions and public-sector expansion. The Permiso acquisition adds a cloud-native platform that detects threats across human, non-human and agentic identities. The company said Permiso brings around 400 native risk detections compared with roughly 90 in Okta’s existing Identity Threat Protection offering, potentially strengthening post-authentication monitoring and runtime security. Okta for AI Agents-Core extends AI-agent governance into FedRAMP and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) environments, while Impact Level 5 authorization expands opportunities with the U.S. Department of Defense as agencies work toward the 2027 Zero Trust mandate. Public sector currently represents less than 10% of Okta’s business, leaving room for further growth.
Okta’s ecosystem provides another advantage. Anthropic named Okta the first identity provider supporting Enterprise Managed Auth for Model Context Protocol connectors, while the company has expanded relationships with Amazon Web Services, Cisco, OpenAI, Databricks and Snowflake and added more than 25 Cross-App Access integrations. These partnerships should help enterprises secure agents across heterogeneous applications and clouds while supporting cross-selling and broader platform adoption.
OKTA Faces Tough CompetitionMicrosoft and CrowdStrike are intensifying competitive pressure. Microsoft’s E7 suite combines Copilot, E5, Entra and Agent 365, attracting hundreds of enterprise customers and millions of seats within two months, including a 400,000-employee deployment at EY. Agent 365 has nearly 40 million agents registered, while Purview has audited more than 50 billion Copilot interactions. Project Perception further combines Entra, Defender, network and application-security signals to automate attack simulation, investigation and remediation.
CrowdStrike reported in the second quarter of fiscal 2027 that AI Detection and Response (AIDR) annual recurring revenues (ARR) nearly tripled sequentially, identity ARR rose 34% to more than $585 million and Falcon Shield ARR surged more than 185%. Privileged-account security ARR increased more than 35-fold, while Signal provides granular access controls for human and non-human identities. Falcon Flex also generates more than 40% average ARR uplift when customers migrate from standard subscriptions, strengthening CrowdStrike’s ability to bundle endpoint, cloud, identity, SIEM and AI security into a broader platform offering.
OKTA’s Share Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesShares of Okta have appreciated 92.3% year to date, outperforming the broader Zacks Computer and Technology sector’s 17.1% growth.
OKTA Stock’s Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
OKTA stock is trading at a premium, with a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 40.46X compared with the broader sector’s 20.76X. Okta has a Value Score of F.
OKTA’s Valuation
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Okta’s earnings is currently pegged at 93 cents per share, unchanged over the past 30 days, suggesting 13.41% growth.
Okta currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Cadence ve 2. čtvrtletí vytvořila provozní peněžní tok 635 mil. USD a volný peněžní tok 582 mil. USD, přičemž odkoupila akcie za 200 mil. USD. Na rok 2026 očekává provozní peněžní tok 2 mld. USD a zhruba 50 % volného peněžního toku chce použít na zpětné odkupy akcií.
Key Takeaways Cadence generated $582 million in second-quarter free cash flow and repurchased $200 million of shares.Cadence expects $2 billion in 2026 operating cash flow and plans to use about 50% of FCF for buybacks.Cadence is investing in AI, M&A and go-to-market capabilities while remaining an asset-light business. Cadence Design Systems (CDNS - Free Report) appears well-positioned to balance growth investments with shareholder returns, buoyed by strong cash flow generation.
In the second quarter of 2026, Cadence generated an operating cash flow of $635 million compared with the prior quarter’s $356 million. Free cash flow was $582 million compared with $307 million in the previous quarter. As of June 30, 2026, cash and cash equivalents stood at $1.44 billion while long-term debt was $2.482 billion.
The company repurchased its shares worth $200 million in the second quarter. For 2026, operating cash flow is expected to be $2 billion compared with $1.875 billion to $1.975 billion projected earlier. The company expects to utilize roughly 50% of its free cash flow to repurchase shares in 2026.
The key question is whether this level of cash generation can remain sufficient as Cadence steps up spending on strategic opportunities.
These investments are aimed at strengthening the company’s technology portfolio and go-to-market capabilities. The company also does not expect Agentic AI to require a massive increase in capital intensity. Cadence remains an asset-light business.
Cadence expects acquisition profitability and IP profitability to improve as it moves into 2027. The company also pursues strategic M&A to supplement organic growth. In February 2026, Cadence acquired the Design & Engineering division of Hexagon AB, including its MSC Software business, in a deal worth €2.7 billion. The buyout will extend its presence in the multi-billion-dollar structural analysis market.
Cadence is a well-known name in the electronic system design space. The company is witnessing broad-based demand for its solutions, especially the AI-driven portfolio, amid increasing design complexity. Given strong demand trends, management raised 2026 revenue guidance to $6.26-$6.34 billion from $6.125-$6.225 billion previously. It also continues to expect roughly 80% recurring revenue.
Nonetheless, volatile global macroeconomic conditions and substantial exposure to the semiconductor vertical are concerning for CDNS. Stiff competition from players such as Synopsys (SNPS - Free Report) and Keysight Technologies (KEYS - Free Report) remains concerning.
Mapping the Competitive TerrainSynopsys is one of the closest competitors for CDNS in the EDA space. The company generated $746 million in third-quarter free cash flow. SNPS raised its cash flow from operations guidance to approximately $2.8 billion (up $500 million) on strong cash collections while reducing capex guidance to $225 million. This will result in free cash flow of roughly $2.6 billion, an increase of $600 million compared with the previous guidance. The company did not repurchase shares in the third quarter of fiscal 2026.
Synopsys ended the third quarter with $3.6 billion in cash and short-term investments.
Keysight Technologies is a provider of electronic design and test instrumentation systems. In the third quarter of fiscal 2026, Keysight Technologies generated $403 million in free cash flow and repurchased $210 million of shares, taking year-to-date buybacks to $517 million. As of July 31, 2026, the company had $2.61 billion in cash and cash equivalents and $1.82 billion of long-term debt. The company is simultaneously investing ahead of opportunities in AI infrastructure, 6G and advanced semiconductors.
For the fourth quarter of fiscal 2026, Keysight Technologies expects revenues in the range of $1.93-$1.95 billion.
CDNS Price Performance, Valuation and EstimatesShares of CDNS have edged up 1.3% in the past month compared with the Computer Software industry’s growth of 6.4%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CDNS trades at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 37.9X, below the industry’s 24.02X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CDNS’ earnings for 2026 has been revised upward over the past 60 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CDNS currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Monster Beverage ve 2. čtvrtletí zvýšila čisté tržby segmentu Monster Energy Drinks o 21,6 % na 2,36 miliardy USD, tažené růstem prodejů energy drinků.
Key Takeaways Monster Beverage's energy drink case sales jumped, driving 21.6% net sales growth in its core segment.Ultra and Juice Monster posted strong U.S. growth as new products expanded Monster's consumer reach.International expansion and pricing actions support growth, while EPS estimates have recently declined. Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST - Free Report) continues to benefit from the sustained expansion of the global energy drinks category and its steady cadence of product innovations. Robust consumer demand across key markets has supported strong momentum in MNST’s core energy portfolio. With category trends remaining favorable worldwide, the company is well-positioned to maintain its growth trajectory and continue gaining market share.
In the second quarter of 2026, energy drink case sales increased to 304.9 million, 192-ounce case equivalents, from 249.3 million a year ago. The Monster Energy Drinks segment’s net sales increased 21.6% year over year to $2.36 billion. International expansion, operational efficiency and product innovation are driving the company's overall performance.
Product launches remain central to Monster Beverage’s strategy to increase consumer reach and strengthen its portfolio. In the second quarter of 2026, management highlighted continued growth from Ultra, Juice Monster and innovation across Ultra, Reign and Bang brand families. The Ultra brand family grew 19% year over year in the United States, while Juice Monster grew 26%. Management also noted that innovation contributed to second-quarter sales growth and that FLRT and Storm marketing efforts were being expanded. A broader portfolio across zero-sugar, full-sugar, wellness and affordable offerings allows Monster Beverage to target additional consumers and usage occasions.
Management said staggered 2026 launches improved execution, while limited-time offerings performed well. The company also continues to expand zero-sugar products, food-service distribution and affordable energy brands in international markets. July sales, excluding Alcohol Brands, were estimated to be 14.3% above the prior-year period, providing an early read on continued sales momentum. Management has initiated discussions with U.S. partners and customers regarding selective pricing actions expected to take effect in the fourth quarter. In EMEA, Monster Beverage has already implemented aggregate low-single-digit pricing in certain markets and is considering additional increases elsewhere.
At its core, Monster Beverage will continue to benefit from steady growth in the global energy drink market, supported by strong demand across convenience stores and other key retail channels. Its efforts to advance innovation, expand its international presence and enhance operational efficiency are expected to further strengthen its performance.
MNST’s Price Performance, Valuation and EstimatesShares of Monster Beverage have gained 15.6% in the past six months compared with the industry’s growth of 4%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, MNST trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 38.71X compared with the industry’s average of 19.83X.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for MNST’s 2026 and 2027 EPS indicates year-over-year growth of 7.8% and 14.3%, respectively. The company’s EPS estimates for 2026 and 2027 have dipped in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Monster Beverage currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Stocks to Consider in the Consumer Staples SpaceThe Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF - Free Report) , which is a distributor of specialty food products in the United States, currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Chefs' Warehouse's current financial-year sales indicates growth of 10.6% from the prior-year level. CHEF delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 30.4%, on average.
Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR - Free Report) , which produces sustainable natural ingredients derived from edible and inedible bio-nutrients, currently sports a Zacks Rank of 1.
The consensus estimate for Darling Ingredients’ current financial-year sales is expected to rise 11.5% from the year-ago reported figure. DAR delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 38.9%, on average.
Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ - Free Report) , which is a leading manufacturer of a diverse portfolio of salty snacks, currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). UTZ delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 1.8%, on average.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for UTZ’s current financial-year sales indicates a jump of 3.7% from the year-ago number.
It hasn't been an easy year for the luxury apparel company Lululemon (LULU +0.88%). The stock is down nearly 42% this year, largely due to weakness in North American sales and management's trimming of full-year guidance earlier this year.
The stock now trades at a cheap 11 times forward earnings. But just because a stock looks cheap, that doesn't mean it can't get cheaper, especially in the near term when sentiment is poor.
The company faces a critical earnings report on Thursday, Sept. 3, when it reports its 2026 fiscal year second-quarter earnings results after the market closes. Management will also host a live conference call with analysts.
While it's incredibly difficult to predict how a stock will move in response to a near-term event, Lululemon's next earnings report could send the stock plummeting. Here's why.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
Management could cut guidance againIn the first quarter, Lululemon slashed its full-year guidance, reducing annual revenue growth projections from 2% to 4% to flat or down 1%.
Management attributed the declining guidance to negative press, which hurt sales in the U.S. and China.
In June, Lululemon issued a public apology after a promotional event on the Great Wall of China, where it accidentally used a Japanese instrument while intending to promote Chinese culture.
There has also been a perception that the brand is not innovating enough and that its clothing line is stale.
Since then, analysts have speculated whether the company may have to take down guidance again, given that the guidance still implies improvement in the back half of the year relative to second-quarter trends.
There's been more concern since Dick's Sporting Goods recently reported earnings and lowered guidance due to sectorwide challenges, noting that it increased promotions amid competition.
Dick's doesn't carry Lulu apparel, but that doesn't mean it can't be indicative of broader industry trends.
Premium Feature
Moneyball Superscore
60/100
Today's Change
(
0.88
%) $
1.07
Current Price
$
121.88
Last week, Goldman Sachs analyst Brooke Roach reiterated a neutral rating on the stock and lowered its price target by $11 to $111 per share.
Roach noted persistent pressure on demand, weak consumer sentiment, increased promotions, and potential slowing growth in China.
Why the stock could plummetObviously, if management lowers guidance again, investors will lose a lot of confidence in the stock in the near term, meaning the company will need to show tangible progress in reversing revenue and earnings trends.
However, as I'd like to reiterate from above, predicting a stock's movement based on a near-term event is extremely difficult.
It's possible that sentiment is already so poor that even a bad earnings report that comes in just a little better than expected is enough to rejuvenate investor interest.
Lululemon still has a decent long-term investment case. The company has built a loyal customer base, as demonstrated by gross margins above 54% in its latest quarter.
Yes, that's down from over 58% a year ago, but still very strong overall. Lulu also has a new CEO starting on Sept. 8. Improved industrywide sentiment and some newer product lines that excite customers could turn the stock around.
But in the near term, it's hard for me to view the stock favorably heading into earnings, given industrywide trends and the company's recent struggles.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ve 2. čtvrtletí získal novou pozici v Lincoln Electric za zhruba 3,88 milionu USD. Firma zároveň oznámila čtvrtletní dividendu 0,79 USD na akcii.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board bought a new stake in shares of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO – Free Report) in the second quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund bought 14,600 shares of the industrial products company’s stock, valued at approximately $3,876,000.
A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds have also recently modified their holdings of the company. BlackRock Inc. bought a new stake in shares of Lincoln Electric in the second quarter worth $656,165,000. Diamant Asset Management Inc. lifted its holdings in Lincoln Electric by 24,685.8% in the first quarter. Diamant Asset Management Inc. now owns 3,839,568 shares of the industrial products company’s stock valued at $956,360,000 after acquiring an additional 3,824,077 shares during the period. Norges Bank purchased a new position in Lincoln Electric in the fourth quarter worth about $415,155,000. Geode Capital Management LLC boosted its position in Lincoln Electric by 0.5% in the fourth quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 1,306,641 shares of the industrial products company’s stock worth $313,175,000 after purchasing an additional 6,070 shares during the last quarter. Finally, JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew its stake in shares of Lincoln Electric by 14.1% during the 4th quarter. JPMorgan Chase & Co. now owns 1,280,116 shares of the industrial products company’s stock valued at $306,767,000 after purchasing an additional 158,305 shares during the period. 79.61% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth Several research firms have recently commented on LECO. DA Davidson began coverage on shares of Lincoln Electric in a research report on Tuesday, June 16th. They set a “buy” rating and a $320.00 price target for the company. Wall Street Zen upgraded shares of Lincoln Electric from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Saturday, August 8th. UBS Group initiated coverage on shares of Lincoln Electric in a report on Monday, August 10th. They set a “buy” rating and a $340.00 target price for the company. Morgan Stanley upgraded shares of Lincoln Electric from an “underweight” rating to an “equal weight” rating and increased their price target for the stock from $257.00 to $283.00 in a research report on Monday, August 10th. Finally, Weiss Ratings upgraded shares of Lincoln Electric from a “buy (b-)” rating to a “buy (b)” rating in a research note on Friday, July 10th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, five have given a Buy rating and four have assigned a Hold rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, the stock has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $307.22.
Get Our Latest Stock Report on LECO Lincoln Electric Price Performance NASDAQ LECO opened at $284.89 on Monday. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. has a 52 week low of $216.22 and a 52 week high of $310.00. The company has a quick ratio of 1.20, a current ratio of 1.98 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.74. The company has a market capitalization of $15.53 billion, a P/E ratio of 28.46, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.71 and a beta of 1.20. The stock’s 50-day moving average price is $267.37 and its 200-day moving average price is $265.88.
Lincoln Electric (NASDAQ:LECO – Get Free Report) last announced its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, July 30th. The industrial products company reported $2.93 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $2.81 by $0.12. The company had revenue of $1.22 billion during the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $1.17 billion. Lincoln Electric had a return on equity of 39.23% and a net margin of 12.35%.The firm’s revenue was up 12.0% on a year-over-year basis. During the same period in the previous year, the company posted $2.60 EPS. On average, equities research analysts predict that Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. will post 11.13 earnings per share for the current year.
Lincoln Electric Announces Dividend The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, October 15th. Shareholders of record on Wednesday, September 30th will be given a $0.79 dividend. This represents a $3.16 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 1.1%. The ex-dividend date is Wednesday, September 30th. Lincoln Electric’s dividend payout ratio is presently 31.57%.
Insider Buying and Selling at Lincoln Electric In other news, EVP Michael J. Whitehead sold 845 shares of the stock in a transaction on Tuesday, June 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $274.81, for a total value of $232,214.45. Following the completion of the sale, the executive vice president directly owned 9,319 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $2,560,954.39. This represents a 8.31% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink. 1.68% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.
(Free Report)
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc (NASDAQ: LECO) is a global manufacturer and distributor of welding products, robotic welding systems, plasma and oxyfuel cutting equipment, and surface treatment systems. The company’s portfolio encompasses welding consumables such as electrodes and wires, as well as power sources, torches, and automated welding cells. Lincoln Electric also offers software solutions and training services designed to optimize productivity and quality in fabrication and manufacturing operations.
Founded in 1895 by John C.
Recommended Stories Five stocks we like better than Lincoln Electric Strike a Balance Between Growth and Stability With These 3 Names Ready to Rally Rubrik’s AI Security Bet Could Power the Next Leg Higher Apple’s Foldable iPhone Could Be a Catalyst, But Not a Cure-All Snowflake Is Up Nearly 50% in 2026—What Are Short Sellers Betting Against?
Receive News & Ratings for Lincoln Electric Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Lincoln Electric and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ve 2. čtvrtletí nově koupila 191 353 akcií Envista za zhruba 5,042 milionu USD. Envista zároveň za čtvrtletí vykázala EPS 0,41 USD a tržby 730,5 milionu USD, což překonalo odhady.
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board acquired a new position in Envista Holdings Corporation (NYSE:NVST – Free Report) during the 2nd quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor acquired 191,353 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $5,042,000. Canada Pension Plan Investment Board owned about 0.12% of Envista at the end of the most recent quarter.
A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds have also bought and sold shares of the stock. GSA Capital Partners LLP bought a new position in Envista in the second quarter valued at $2,039,000. Pzena Investment Management LLC bought a new stake in Envista during the second quarter worth about $30,494,000. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP boosted its holdings in shares of Envista by 1.6% in the 1st quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 9,780,948 shares of the company’s stock worth $248,130,000 after purchasing an additional 152,488 shares in the last quarter. SummitTX Capital L.P. purchased a new stake in Envista in the first quarter worth approximately $4,268,000. Finally, Principal Financial Group Inc. boosted its stake in shares of Envista by 36.8% in the 1st quarter. Principal Financial Group Inc. now owns 483,983 shares of the company’s stock valued at $12,279,000 after purchasing an additional 130,237 shares in the last quarter.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth A number of brokerages have issued reports on NVST. JPMorgan Chase & Co. raised their price target on shares of Envista from $26.00 to $29.00 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a report on Thursday, May 7th. Weiss Ratings raised Envista from a “hold (c-)” rating to a “hold (c)” rating in a research note on Thursday, August 6th. Zacks Research raised shares of Envista from a “hold” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note on Friday, August 7th. Wall Street Zen raised Envista from a “buy” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Saturday, August 22nd. Finally, Morgan Stanley set a $23.00 target price on shares of Envista in a research note on Thursday, August 6th. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a Strong Buy rating, six have given a Buy rating and nine have given a Hold rating to the company. Based on data from MarketBeat, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $29.31.
Check Out Our Latest Stock Analysis on NVST Envista Stock Performance NYSE NVST opened at $27.15 on Monday. Envista Holdings Corporation has a twelve month low of $18.77 and a twelve month high of $30.42. The business has a 50-day moving average price of $27.12 and a 200-day moving average price of $26.35. The company has a quick ratio of 2.07, a current ratio of 2.43 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.47. The firm has a market cap of $4.36 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 46.81, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 1.29 and a beta of 0.86.
Envista (NYSE:NVST – Get Free Report) last issued its earnings results on Wednesday, August 5th. The company reported $0.41 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.34 by $0.07. The firm had revenue of $730.50 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $716.11 million. Envista had a net margin of 3.33% and a return on equity of 7.88%. Envista’s revenue for the quarter was up 7.1% on a year-over-year basis. During the same quarter in the prior year, the business earned $0.26 earnings per share. Envista has set its FY 2026 guidance at 1.500-1.550 EPS. As a group, equities research analysts predict that Envista Holdings Corporation will post 1.53 EPS for the current fiscal year.
Insider Activity at Envista In related news, SVP Mischa Reis sold 8,000 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Thursday, August 20th. The shares were sold at an average price of $27.50, for a total value of $220,000.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the senior vice president directly owned 27,321 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $751,327.50. This trade represents a 22.65% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. The transaction was executed under a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. Corporate insiders own 0.99% of the company’s stock.
About Envista (Free Report)
Envista Holdings Corporation is a global dental products company that develops, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of dental consumables, equipment and technology solutions. Headquartered in Brea, California, Envista serves dental practitioners, specialists and laboratories in more than 150 countries. The company’s offerings span implant, orthodontic, endodontic and restorative product lines as well as digital imaging systems and practice management software.
Envista’s product brands include Nobel Biocare for dental implants and restorative solutions, Ormco for orthodontic appliances and treatment systems, Kerr for restorative and endodontic materials, KaVo for dental imaging and handpieces, and Vista for surgical drills and instruments.
See Also Five stocks we like better than Envista Strike a Balance Between Growth and Stability With These 3 Names Ready to Rally Rubrik’s AI Security Bet Could Power the Next Leg Higher Apple’s Foldable iPhone Could Be a Catalyst, But Not a Cure-All Snowflake Is Up Nearly 50% in 2026—What Are Short Sellers Betting Against? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding NVST? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Envista Holdings Corporation (NYSE:NVST – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Envista Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Envista and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
US spot Solana ETFs just had their best week of 2026, pulling in over $153 million in net inflows as institutional appetite for the asset class continues to accelerate. The surge was punctuated by a single-day peak of $60.91 million on August 27, the third-highest daily inflow since these products first hit the market last October.
Daily trading volume across the category hit $196.82 million on the same day.
Bitwise’s BSOL is running away with the category Bitwise’s BSOL, a Solana staking ETF that offers investors yield on top of price exposure, captured $40.2 million on August 27, roughly 66% of all inflows that day.
That performance pushed the fund past a milestone: $1 billion in assets under management for the first time. BSOL is estimated to hold around 9.3 million SOL tokens, with cumulative inflows sitting between $1.01 billion and $1.03 billion. That means a single fund accounts for approximately 77-80% of all capital that has ever flowed into the entire US spot Solana ETF category.
Nine spot Solana ETFs now trade in the US, issued by names like Grayscale (GSOL), Fidelity (FSOL), Morgan Stanley (MSOL), VanEck (VSOL), and 21Shares (TSOL). Most of these products incorporate staking options, giving holders a way to earn yield rather than simply sit on spot exposure.
The entire category’s total AUM now stands at roughly $1.49 billion, with cumulative net inflows exceeding $1.3 billion since launch.
August is shaping up as a landmark month Cumulative inflows for August 2026 surged past $174 million with two trading days still remaining, making it the strongest month of the year for Solana ETFs.
The US spot Solana ETF market came into existence on October 28, 2025, after the SEC relaxed its rules around crypto fund listings. In less than a year, the category has grown from zero to nearly $1.5 billion in managed assets.
The staking component appears to be a meaningful differentiator. Unlike Bitcoin ETFs, which can only offer pure spot exposure, Solana’s proof-of-stake architecture allows ETF issuers to generate yield for investors. A Solana staking ETF effectively turns SOL into something closer to a yield-bearing instrument.
With BSOL alone holding an estimated 9.3 million SOL, that’s a meaningful chunk of tokens effectively removed from the tradeable float, strengthening network security and reducing circulating supply simultaneously.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
The USDC Treasury minted 130,724,040 USDC, valued at approximately $130.76 million, in a single transaction tracked by on-chain monitoring service Whale Alert. The mint is one piece of a much larger wave of issuance: Circle executed roughly $5 billion in gross USDC minting during the week ending August 26, 2026.
What is actually happening when USDC gets minted An institution deposits dollars into a Circle reserve account, Circle verifies the funds, and new USDC tokens are created on-chain in an equivalent amount. Circle backs every USDC token with reserves held predominantly in short-duration US Treasuries and cash equivalents. Total reserves currently sit at around $74 billion, comfortably covering the circulating supply of just over $73 billion.
Advertisement
Solana has emerged as the primary destination for new supply. Multiple individual minting events of $250 million each occurred on the network during the same week, combining to roughly $1.25 billion minted on Solana alone.
Why institutions keep reaching for on-chain dollars Hyperliquid offers a concrete example. Circle plays a technical support role for Hyperliquid’s $5 billion USDC reserve, meaning that platform alone represents a meaningful slice of total circulating supply.
What a $73B circulating supply means for the broader market USDC crossing $73 billion in circulating market cap represents a sustained expansion of dollar liquidity available inside crypto markets. From a competitive standpoint, USDC’s growth trajectory keeps it in a direct contest with Tether’s USDT for dominance in the stablecoin market. Circle’s decision to concentrate new issuance on Solana is also worth watching as a signal about which blockchain ecosystems institutional capital views as viable infrastructure. The $5 billion weekly gross issuance figure suggests that inflow is not a one-week anomaly but part of a durable trend worth tracking through on-chain data as the year progresses.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Rujira je globálně pozastavena, zatímco tým THORChain zkoumá obavy z non-determinismu. Spor se vede o to, zda stačilo pozastavit jen rizikový kontrakt, nebo celý app layer.
THORChain x Rujira Podcast #230 ft. PragmaticMonkey, KentonC137 & patriotsounds | August 29, 2026 | Watch the full episode on YouTube
By Raynalytics
TL;DRRujira's app layer was globally paused while THORChain's base-layer team investigates non-determinism concerns. Pragmatic Monkey argued that the known risky contract could have remained paused while other app-layer activity resumed, but Kenton stressed that the full technical picture was still emerging.The dispute was not only about uptime. A global pause leaves users unable to manage positions and removes the app layer from price dislocations that can generate revenue for Rujira and THORChain.Pragmatic Monkey said a prior restart produced more than $500,000 in volume and about $18,000 of revenue in a few blocks. Those are his internal figures from a prior event, not a forecast for the next restart.The episode's shared conclusion was straightforward: stability takes priority, but emergency decisions need a clearer communication and coordination process.Custom Concentrated Liquidity is live. Dynamic Concentrated Liquidity is being tested, while Sonar remains a possible future mobile product rather than a committed launch.IntroductionTwo days after THORChain's stability-first update, a separate problem came into view: Rujira's app layer was not merely slowing new work, it was globally paused.
Pragmatic Monkey joined Kenton and Denny to explain why Rujira contributors were frustrated. The immediate question was technical, but the bigger question was operational: when a decentralized network needs an emergency control, who communicates the scope, the rationale and the path back online?
1. The App Layer Is Paused While the Base Layer StabilizesPragmatic Monkey said the chain had encountered several non-determinism issues, the kind that can cause nodes to disagree about the state of the network. One app-layer yield contract was the observed trigger when it was enabled. The base layer had returned after the contract was paused, he said, but the wider app layer remained halted.
His position was not that stability should be sacrificed for activity. Rujira's team supports the broader decision to slow releases and focus on making the base layer robust. The disagreement was over scope. Pragmatic Monkey said the affected contract had already been isolated successfully, so a contract-level pause could let other app-layer positions and strategies operate while the investigation continued.
"We own this system together." (Pragmatic Monkey)Kenton did not present the case as settled. He said he did not have all the technical information and pointed to the possibility of further concerns that justified testing before a restart. That distinction matters. The episode records Rujira's argument for a narrower pause, not a confirmed finding that a global pause was unnecessary.
For users, however, the difference is tangible. A global halt can leave collateralized positions inaccessible while markets move. Current positions were described as standard CDPs rather than perps, which lowers but does not remove liquidation risk. The same control model would be much harder to defend once high-leverage products exist.
2. Decentralization Needs an Emergency ProcessThe episode became a live governance discussion. Pragmatic Monkey said Rujira had no warning that the full app layer would remain paused when the base layer restarted. Kenton agreed that communication needed to improve, while also resisting a judgment before the contributing developers had explained their reasoning.
"Real decentralization should not mean no coordination." (Pragmatic Monkey)The network's ability to halt a contract or the app layer is a strength in a genuine emergency. The problem is making that power predictable for users, builders and node operators. Rujira's proposed minimum is not centralized control. It is an agreed process: identify the risk, use the narrowest safe scope, tell affected teams and users what happened, and state the conditions for reopening.
Kenton framed the tension with an emergency-brake analogy. A brake belongs on the train, but it should be pulled for an emergency, not as an ordinary operating decision. The practical follow-up is to determine whether the available evidence required a global halt and to make the next decision easier to understand in real time.
"We have to find some chain of command or some procedure or something like that that we can all agree to." (Kenton)This is also a reminder of how THORChain governance works. Node operators can coordinate a different outcome when the necessary threshold is reached. That is decentralized control, but it does not eliminate the need for shared norms around safety-critical actions.
3. A Restart Can Be an Economic EventThe cost of the pause is not limited to unavailable positions. Rujira's architecture can capture price differences between its app-layer markets and THORChain's base-layer pools. When those markets restart out of sync, the resulting dislocations can create arbitrage opportunities that flow through the protocol instead of entirely to external traders.
Pragmatic Monkey showed a prior restart in which, he said, Rujira processed more than $500,000 of volume and generated roughly $18,000 in revenue in a few blocks. He said nearly all of that revenue came from arbitrage, despite total app-layer TVL remaining below $2 million at the time. Under Rujira's 50/50 revenue split, he estimated about $9,000 went to THORChain from that event.
"We made $18,000 of revenue in just a few blocks." (Pragmatic Monkey)Those figures describe a prior event with its own market conditions, not an estimate for a future restart. But they explain Rujira's urgency. A wide price gap can be an opportunity to internalize value for liquidity providers and the protocol. Keeping the app layer closed means that opportunity is instead left to whatever external arbitrage can access the base-layer markets.
The same argument has limits. A restart must not be rushed merely to capture revenue. The point is that an app-layer pause changes market access and economic outcomes, so its scope and duration deserve the same transparent treatment as its security rationale.
4. CCL Is Live. DCL and Sonar Remain Work in ProgressThe original plan for the show was a demonstration of Custom Concentrated Liquidity, or CCL. That product is live and lets users provide liquidity within a chosen range. A broader walkthrough is being rescheduled.
The next product, Dynamic Concentrated Liquidity, or DCL, is earlier. As covered in the Podcast #223 recap, DCL is designed to move beyond a fixed range. Pragmatic Monkey said the new strategy would use an oracle price and a user's average entry price, buying only when it lowers that average and selling above it at a target spread.
That does not make DCL live. The first contract version was only days into testing, and Pragmatic Monkey was still examining how it behaves in a sustained one-way market. A strategy that protects an average entry price can also go long periods without trading, which is good for capital preservation but less useful for steady market making and protocol volume.
"More stability, more robustness, and then we can move on to actually try to continue building the cool apps." (Pragmatic Monkey)The group also discussed Sonar, a future Rujira mobile product. It is not an active release. Rujira's immediate priority is improving its web and mobile-web experience, while a rebuilt mobile app remains a possibility when capacity permits.
What to WatchThe app-layer restart: what the base-layer and Maya teams conclude about broader non-determinism risk, and whether the app layer can return with the affected contract still paused.Emergency coordination: whether contributors establish a clearer process for scoped halts, communication and restart conditions.User-position safeguards: how the pause model evolves before higher-risk products such as perps are introduced.Restart economics: whether a future synchronized restart again creates internalized arbitrage revenue, and how that value is distributed.DCL testing: whether the strategy can balance average-entry protection with enough activity to be useful for market making.Sonar: whether mobile-web improvements lead to a formal plan for a Rujira mobile app.More THORChain data, check out raynalytics.net
Follow Raynalytics for more Weekly Analytics and Podcast recaps.
Monero ($XMR) v srpnu 2026 vzrostlo o více než 45 % a zaznamenalo nejsilnější měsíční výkonnost za více než čtyři roky. Růst podpořilo spuštění nativních swapů XMR na THORChain 3.20.
Monero ($XMR) has posted its strongest monthly performance in more than four years, gaining over 45% in August 2026 and rising roughly 10% in a single 24-hour window. The last time the privacy-focused cryptocurrency delivered a comparable monthly gain was April 2021.
THORChain 3.20 Brings Native XMR Swaps The rally coincides with a significant protocol upgrade from THORChain. The timing matters:
That is a notable shift for Monero holders in particular.
Derivatives Market Signals Strong Demand The price action has been accompanied by a sharp move in derivatives markets. during the move, a dynamic that can amplify upward price momentum as bearish bets are forcibly closed.
The THORChain upgrade offers a structural reason for renewed interest beyond short-term speculation. A decentralized, non-custodial alternative for XMR swaps could help sustain demand if that trend continues.
Corient Private Wealth LP ve 2. čtvrtletí koupila nový podíl ve Wintrust Financial za zhruba 9 244 000 USD. Banka zároveň oznámila kvartální EPS 3,30 USD a výnosy 738,63 milionu USD, obojí nad odhady.
Corient Private Wealth LP purchased a new stake in shares of Wintrust Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:WTFC – Free Report) during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm purchased 57,513 shares of the bank’s stock, valued at approximately $9,244,000. Corient Private Wealth LP owned 0.09% of Wintrust Financial as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.
A number of other institutional investors and hedge funds also recently added to or reduced their stakes in the company. BlackRock Inc. acquired a new stake in shares of Wintrust Financial during the 2nd quarter valued at about $1,058,088,000. Bank of America Corp DE acquired a new position in Wintrust Financial in the 2nd quarter worth about $168,021,000. Norges Bank acquired a new position in Wintrust Financial in the 4th quarter worth about $111,924,000. Wellington Management Group LLP purchased a new position in Wintrust Financial during the third quarter worth approximately $90,187,000. Finally, Jupiter Topco LLC purchased a new position in Wintrust Financial during the second quarter worth approximately $92,734,000. Hedge funds and other institutional investors own 93.48% of the company’s stock.
Insiders Place Their Bets In other news, COO David A. Dykstra sold 13,515 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Thursday, August 13th. The stock was sold at an average price of $162.77, for a total transaction of $2,199,836.55. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief operating officer directly owned 166,449 shares in the company, valued at $27,092,903.73. This trade represents a 7.51% decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is available at the SEC website. Company insiders own 1.24% of the company’s stock.
Wintrust Financial Stock Performance WTFC opened at $152.95 on Monday. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62, a current ratio of 0.98 and a quick ratio of 0.97. The company’s 50 day simple moving average is $159.51 and its two-hundred day simple moving average is $151.12. Wintrust Financial Corporation has a 1-year low of $119.61 and a 1-year high of $167.21. The firm has a market capitalization of $10.32 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.29 and a beta of 0.85. Wintrust Financial (NASDAQ:WTFC – Get Free Report) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Monday, July 20th. The bank reported $3.30 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $3.15 by $0.15. Wintrust Financial had a return on equity of 13.37% and a net margin of 20.72%.The business had revenue of $738.63 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $735.36 million. During the same quarter in the previous year, the firm earned $2.78 EPS. The company’s quarterly revenue was up 10.1% compared to the same quarter last year. Analysts expect that Wintrust Financial Corporation will post 13.04 EPS for the current fiscal year.
Wintrust Financial Dividend Announcement The business also recently disclosed a quarterly dividend, which was paid on Thursday, August 20th. Investors of record on Thursday, August 6th were given a dividend of $0.55 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend was Thursday, August 6th. This represents a $2.20 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 1.4%. Wintrust Financial’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is presently 17.67%.
Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth WTFC has been the subject of several recent analyst reports. Citigroup lowered shares of Wintrust Financial from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, July 21st. Raymond James Financial initiated coverage on shares of Wintrust Financial in a report on Tuesday, July 7th. They set an “outperform” rating and a $180.00 price objective on the stock. DA Davidson boosted their target price on shares of Wintrust Financial from $185.00 to $190.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, July 22nd. Piper Sandler set a $186.00 price target on shares of Wintrust Financial in a research report on Wednesday, July 22nd. Finally, Brean Capital cut Wintrust Financial from a “buy” rating to a “neutral” rating and set a $170.00 price objective on the stock. in a report on Tuesday, July 21st. Nine investment analysts have rated the stock with a Buy rating and four have assigned a Hold rating to the company. According to MarketBeat, the stock currently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $177.77.
Get Our Latest Stock Report on Wintrust Financial
Wintrust Financial Company Profile (Free Report)
Wintrust Financial Corporation is a Chicago‐area bank holding company headquartered in Rosemont, Illinois. Through its primary subsidiary, Wintrust Bank, the company operates a network of community banks serving metropolitan Chicago and select markets in southeastern Wisconsin. These locally branded banks provide personalized commercial and consumer banking solutions tailored to small and mid‐size businesses, professionals, and individual clients.
The firm’s core offerings include deposit products, commercial and residential lending, treasury management, and mortgage banking services.
Further Reading Five stocks we like better than Wintrust Financial Strike a Balance Between Growth and Stability With These 3 Names Ready to Rally Rubrik’s AI Security Bet Could Power the Next Leg Higher Apple’s Foldable iPhone Could Be a Catalyst, But Not a Cure-All Snowflake Is Up Nearly 50% in 2026—What Are Short Sellers Betting Against? Want to see what other hedge funds are holding WTFC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Wintrust Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:WTFC – Free Report).
Receive News & Ratings for Wintrust Financial Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Wintrust Financial and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
Boot Barn oznámil páté po sobě jdoucí čtvrtletí růstu prodejů pracovních bot ve vysokých jednotkách procent. Růst podpořily styly Pull-On i Lace-Up, nové značky třetích stran a silnější prodej pracovního oblečení.
Key Takeaways BOOT's work boots delivered high-single-digit comparable sales growth, its strongest pace in several years.Both Pull-On and Lace-Up styles grew, supported by new third-party brands and deeper product investments.Work apparel reached high-single-digit growth in July, with gains spanning both FR and non-FR products. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT - Free Report) reported continued acceleration in its work business following efforts to reinvigorate the category last year. The company improved in-store merchandising, increased its marketing focus on the work business and invested in key third-party brands to strengthen its assortment for work customers. Management cited these initiatives as part of the progress seen in the category.
The work boots business delivered high-single-digit comparable sales growth in the first quarter of fiscal 2027. This marked the fifth consecutive quarter of growth for the category and represented its strongest growth in the past few years. The performance also reflected the continued acceleration management has seen in the work business.
Management said that the high-single-digit growth in work boots was supported by both Pull-On and Lace-Up styles. Lace-Up boots performed more strongly, but growth was not limited to a single product type. Management also noted that the category's performance was not being driven by oil-related demand. New third-party brands and a broader assortment of successful products from existing third-party brands also supported the category.
The work apparel business continued to show improving momentum, with comparable sales strengthening over the last couple of quarters and reaching high-single-digit growth in July. Performance included both Flame Resistant (FR) and non-FR products, which management described as appearing broad-based across the work apparel assortment rather than being driven by a single product category.
Overall, Boot Barn's work category continued to demonstrate positive momentum, supported by changes to merchandising, marketing and product assortment, as well as resilient demand from its needs-based customers. Management also said it expects the strength in its third-party work boots business to continue, although the transcript does not provide a specific forecast for the future growth rate of the overall work category.
Zacks Rundown for BOOTBoot Barn’s shares have lost 8.8% in the past three months compared with the industry’s decline of 6.2%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Boot Barn trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 16.29, higher than the industry’s average of 13.20. BOOT presently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for BOOT’s current and next fiscal-year earnings implies year-over-year rallies of 22.6% and 10.5%, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Other Stocks to ConsiderSome other top-ranked stocks have been discussed below:
Victoria’s Secret & Co. (VSXY - Free Report) operates as a specialty retailer of women's intimate apparel and other apparel and beauty products worldwide. At present, VSXY sports a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for VSXY’s current fiscal-year sales and earnings implies growth of 9.2% and 57%, respectively, from the year-ago figures. VSXY has delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 81.9%, on average.
FIGS, Inc. (FIGS - Free Report) operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States and internationally. At present, FIGS carries a Zacks Rank of 2.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for FIGS’s current fiscal-year sales and earnings implies growth of 18.2% and 89.5%, respectively, from the year-ago figures. FIGS has delivered a trailing four-quarter earnings surprise of 201.8%, on average.
Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL - Free Report) designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. At present, FOSL carries a Zacks Rank of 2.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for FOSL’s current fiscal-year sales indicates a decline of 4%, while the same for earnings indicates growth of 96.7% from the year-ago figures. FOSL delivered a trailing four-quarter negative earnings surprise of 236.2%, on average.