Market Signal Briefing

Bitget, the world’s largest Universal Exchange (UEX), today announced that BGB will be listed on Kraken, marking a significant milestone in BGB’s global expansion following its transfer to the Morph Foundation in September 2025.

The listing on Kraken represents an important step in extending BGB’s reach to global audiences through a platform recognised for its compliance-first approach and longstanding presence in regulated markets.

By listing with an exchange known for robust standards around custody, regulation, transparency and market integrity, BGB gains broader exposure among institutional participants and crypto users seeking access through established venues.

BGB’s transfer to the Morph Foundation laid the technical groundwork for its next phase of growth.

The move positioned BGB as a governance-first asset, designed to operate natively within a scalable, modular on-chain environment.

BGB has increasingly functioned as a utility token, supporting governance participation, ecosystem incentives, and deeper integration across the Web3 space.

“BGB’s growth depends on where it can be used, not just where it’s traded,” said Colin Goltra, CEO of Morph.

“As more financial activity shifts on-chain, liquidity, accessibility and reliable infrastructure become critical. Expanding BGB’s presence on global platforms strengthens its role as an asset that can support settlement, governance, and scale within modern financial systems.”

As on-chain finance continues to mature, with payments, settlement, and financial infrastructure increasingly moving on-chain, tokens that pair clear utility with regulated access are becoming more central to how value flows globally. 

The Kraken listing represents a meaningful milestone in BGB’s evolution, reaffirming BGB’s status as a globally accessible governance and utility asset. 

A senior executive at Ripple has said that expectations for XRP reaching $100 should be viewed with caution, arguing that large price jumps become less likely as crypto assets mature.

David Schwartz, made the comments while responding to questions from XRP holders comparing XRP’s future price potential with Bitcoin’s early rise.

Focus on Multiples, Not Price TargetsSchwartz said the probability of XRP reaching $100 depends less on the number itself and more on the size of the price increase required. He explained that a 10-times move in XRP today is about as unlikely as a similar 10-times move in Bitcoin or Ethereum at their current sizes.

According to Schwartz, as crypto assets grow larger and more established, achieving large multiples becomes increasingly difficult.

Markets Tend to Price in ExpectationsSchwartz said crypto markets are generally rational over the long term, even if individual traders are not. He argued that enough well-funded and rational participants exist to create effective price ceilings and floors.

In his view, the current prices of major cryptocurrencies already reflect a market-wide estimate of their future value, adjusted for the likelihood of those outcomes.

On Claims of Market ManipulationAddressing concerns about whale manipulation, Schwartz said short-term price moves can sometimes be influenced, particularly in smaller markets. However, he said he does not believe manipulation can sustainably control long-term price trends in major cryptocurrencies such as XRP.

He acknowledged that this view is not widely shared and added that he does not have definitive evidence to settle the debate, noting that many investors believe manipulation plays a larger role.

“While I do thing some crypto markets are sometimes manipulated, I cannot get myself to believe that this could affect long-term prices and price trends. But I will admit that I don’t really have good evidence to support this view and many others believe otherwise,” he said.

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

HBAR is quietly positioning themselves at the center of two of crypto’s fastest-growing narratives: prediction markets & on-chain indexes.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: January 30, 2026 │ 3:20 PM GMT

Created by Gabor Kovacs from DailyCoin

In a brief market update, Crypto Wendy argues that Hedera is quietly aligning itself with two of crypto’s fastest-emerging narratives: prediction markets and on-chain index products. As traders crowd into platforms like Polymarket and look for lower-friction exposure to baskets of assets, Hedera-linked tools are positioning to catch that flow.

Prediction Markets Land On Telegram Via Hedera (HBAR)The most immediate development is Victor.ai’s launch of what Wendy O describes as “the first prediction market bot on Telegram via Hedera.” The bot functions as a prediction market interface inside Telegram, enabling users to trade event outcomes using Hedera and USDC.

According to the market analyst, the tool supports funding a Hedera wallet, viewing markets and positions, and swapping between HBAR and USD, all while letting users “play around with Polymarket” a platform currently drawing attention in crypto circles.

Sponsored

The host frames this as part of a broader pivot: as sentiment shifts, “a lot of people in crypto right now are pivoting to Polymarket or prediction markets because of the current state of things.”

Within that backdrop, the commentator reiterates Hedera’s thematic focus on “AI, DeFi, and RWAs,” and presents Victor.ai’s bot as evidence that builders on the network are trying to plug directly into where speculative activity is moving.

Hedera Tied Into New TOP-20 Crypto Index On BNB ChainThe video’s second focal point is what the host calls “crypto’s new version of the S&P 500.” Hedera is now “officially alive on CMC20” described as a product that tracks CoinMarketCap’s top 20 cryptocurrencies and offers “single trade exposure to the top 20 cryptos.”

The index is characterized as “the first DeFi native tradable crypto index on BNB chain.” While the video doesn’t dive into mechanics such as rebalancing or fees, it treats CMC20 as a structural step toward more familiar index-style investing on-chain, with Hedera included among the tracked assets.

Wendy O sums up both developments as proof that “despite market conditions we still build” positioning Hedera’s ecosystem as one that adjusts quickly when capital and attention rotate to new themes.

For investors, these moves suggest that Hedera’s relevance may hinge less on headline price action and more on whether its infrastructure becomes embedded in the tools traders actually use—prediction markets, Telegram-native interfaces, and index-style exposure products that mirror traditional benchmarks.

Check out DailyCoin’s hottest crypto scoops now:
Bitcoin Holders Dump 370K BTC — Much More Than Reports Show
Binance Memecoin Purge: 12 Coins Delisted, Is Yours On The List?

People Also Ask:What does Victor.ai’s Telegram bot actually let users do?

The bot lets users fund a HBAR wallet, view prediction markets and positions, and swap between HBAR and USD while interacting with prediction markets linked to Polymarket.

What is CMC20 in this context?

CMC20 is described as a DeFi-native, tradable crypto index on BNB Chain that tracks CoinMarketCap’s top 20 cryptocurrencies and offers one-click exposure to that basket.

How is Hedera positioned in these developments?

Hedera underpins the prediction market bot and is included in the CMC20 index, aligning the network with trends in AI, DeFi, RWAs, and on-chain index investing.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Ethereum's most infamous experiment is back. Not as a venture fund, but as something the ecosystem arguably needs more: a permanent security budget.

On Jan. 29, a group of Ethereum veterans announced plans to convert roughly 75,000 ETH in decade-old recovery funds into a staked endowment whose yield will finance smart contract security work across Ethereum and its layer-2 ecosystem.

The capital comes from “edge case” funds left over from the 2016 hard fork that rescued TheDAO from collapse. Those are funds thatwere always intended, if unclaimed, to support security infrastructure.

A decade later, the tooling and threat landscape have matured enough to operationalize that intent.

The timing reveals a deeper shift. This isn't nostalgia, but recognition that Ethereum's security capacity must scale like an institution if the network wants to underpin global finance.

The pool has grown from millions to nine figures while sitting largely dormant, and the ecosystem finally has the operational primitives to steward it responsibly. What changed wasn't sentiment. What changed was the risk calculus.

What TheDAO will becomeTheDAO Security Fund will steward approximately 70,500 ETH from the ExtraBalance withdrawal contract and roughly 4,600 ETH in the Curator Multisig.

The fund explicitly will not touch ETH inside the main WithdrawDAO contract created by the hard fork. DAO tokens remain redeemable for ETH, and that recovery mechanism stays intact.

The deployment plan treats the capital as an endowment. The fund will stake 69,420 ETH to generate yield, leaving some ETH in ExtraBalance so claims can continue.

Staking operations will run through Dappnode, distributed across six continents, using multiple client implementations and distributed validator keys across several shards.

Even conservative validator economics imply meaningful annual capacity: at roughly 4% APY without MEV-Boost or 5.69% with it, 69,420 ETH generates approximately 2,777 to 3,950 ETH per year before operational costs. At $2,800 per ETH, that translates to roughly $7.8 million to $11.1 million annually.

Staking 69,420 ETH generates annual yield between 2,777 ETH ($7.8 million) and 3,950 ETH ($11.1 million) at current prices.This is a standing security budget that doesn't require the sale of principal.

The fund's scope covers wallet UX and user protection, smart contract security, incident response, and core protocol security, with a focus on Ethereum and its layer-2 ecosystem.

The Ethereum Foundation's Trillion Dollar Security initiative provides the strategic roadmap.

Allocation mechanisms include quadratic funding, retroactive funding, and RFP-based ranked-choice voting, run in rounds by independent operators.

EF Grants Management defines eligibility requirements, Giveth supports operators, and each round ends with a public retrospective. A new curator set will steer the fund: Vitalik Buterin and Griff Green, joined by Taylor Monahan, Jordi Baylina, pcaversaccio, Alex Van de Sande, and Pol Lanski.

TheDAO Security Fund will stake 69,420 ETH from two sources while preserving claims via ExtraBalance and reserving funds for operations.What happened to TheDAOTheDAO was a 2016 on-chain venture fund concept that raised over $150 million and represented roughly 14% of the ETH supply at the time, a scale that made the subsequent exploit existential for Ethereum's legitimacy.

An attacker drained funds through a contract vulnerability, forcing Ethereum into its defining governance moment: a hard fork to move funds into a recovery contract that token holders could use to withdraw their share.

The hard fork created the WithdrawDAO contract, enabling standard redemptions. But standard claims didn't cover everything. A curator multisig was tasked with addressing edge cases, such as late-stage creation pricing discrepancies captured in “ExtraBalance,” child DAO burns, and miscellaneous token and ETH sends.

On Aug. 2, 2016, the curator's communication explicitly stated that, after Jan. 31, 2017, unclaimed ETH would be sent to a not-for-profit entity to support smart contract security, or burned if no such fund existed.

That line is now the moral backbone of the 2026 revival.

TheDAO also became a landmark in US regulation. The SEC's 2017 investigative report concluded that DAO tokens were securities under federal law using a facts-and-circumstances analysis, cementing TheDAO as a recurring reference point in “what is a security?” debates.

The brand carries regulatory baggage, which makes its repurposing as a security-funding mechanism ironic.

Why now, and what it meansThe spark came from security practitioners, not market opportunists.

In August 2025, SEAL 911 explored sustainable funding sources for incident response. Fade from Wintermute pointed out the edge-case funds, leading to outreach via pcaversaccio to Griff Green.

The curator noted that the system was designed to manage roughly $6 million but now holds approximately 75,000 ETH, which is over $200 million at current prices. Doing nothing had become a material security liability.

The ecosystem has better primitives now. The contracts are a decade old, built when Solidity was young. Multisig practices and security frameworks have matured dramatically, exactly the operational upgrade that SEAL's multisig frameworks and distributed validator techniques formalize today.

The Ethereum Foundation's Trillion Dollar Security initiative sets the ambition: Ethereum must achieve “civilization-scale” security to underpin global finance. TheDAO Security Fund explicitly plugs into that roadmap, converting a historical artifact into infrastructure.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

What it means for Ethereum is structural. Security funding can shift from episodic grants triggered by incidents to an endowment model that plans multi-year programs, including incident response capacity, formal verification pipelines, and wallet UX hardening.

The fund becomes a live testbed for how security public goods get priced and selected, running allocation experiments with transparent retrospectives.

If these mechanisms work, they could become templates for other ecosystems.

TheDAO's brand is being repurposed to reframe Ethereum's origin story. In 2016, TheDAO forced Ethereum to reveal its social layer, and the community chose to fork and recover funds rather than treat “code is law” as absolute.

In 2026, that same saga becomes a demonstration that social consensus didn't just bail out users. Instead, it created a decade-long recovery apparatus that can now underwrite security for the entire ecosystem.

The deeper narrative thread connects Ethereum's legitimacy crisis to its institutional maturation: the hard fork that critics called centralized becomes the funding mechanism for decentralized security infrastructure.

There's a latent controversy vector. Even with documented intent, “using leftovers” invites scrutiny. Are claims truly exhausted or just dormant? How will edge-case claims get adjudicated going forward? Does this create governance precedent for other recovery pools?

The fund addresses part of this by leaving claim paths open in ExtraBalance and avoiding the main withdrawal contract, but these questions remain live.

If disputes arise over claim eligibility or curator legitimacy, or if an operational incident affects the multisig or validator setup, the narrative could shift from “security endowment” back to “the DAO controversy returns.”

Three forward pathsThe base case looks like security funding becoming a permanent line item.

If 69,420 ETH stays staked with steady validator yield, and regular grant rounds produce transparent retrospectives that show a measurable pipeline from Trillion Dollar Security priorities to funded work, Ethereum's security capacity scales more like an institution.

This improves confidence for larger on-chain balances and mainstream UX, making security part of the “why build here” story.

The bull case sees security funding become a competitive moat. If yield is strong or ETH price rises, and the annual budget expands materially and grants a meaningful increase in professional incident response and tooling, Ethereum's L2 ecosystem might adopt similar endowment patterns.

Security becomes part of Ethereum's institutional-readiness narrative, much as exchanges and custodians sell trust.

In the adverse case, governance or operational risk dominates the headline. Disputes over claim eligibility, an operational incident involving the multisig or validator setup, or regulatory narratives that revive “DAO token = security” baggage could chill perception, even if funds remain safe. The story shifts from endowment back to controversy.

ScenarioWhat you’d see on-chain / operationallyWhat it means for EthereumPrimary risksBase case: Permanent security line item69,420 ETH remains staked (steady validator ops); regular grant rounds with published retrospectives; clear linkage of funded work to EF Trillion Dollar Security (1TS) priorities; predictable cadence + reportingSecurity funding shifts from episodic “post-incident” grants to an institutional-grade, multi-year budget (incident response capacity, formal verification pipelines, wallet UX hardening); improves confidence for larger on-chain balances and mainstream UXGovernance drift (mission creep, weak accountability); grant capture (insiders/low-ROI spend); operational complacency over timeBull case: Security becomes a moatFavorable yield regime and/or higher ETH price expands annual budget; measurable security outcomes (fewer/severity-reduced incidents, better tooling, faster response); L2s mirror the endowment pattern; allocation mechanisms iterate and improve based on retrospectivesEthereum earns a “why build here” trust premium; security becomes a competitive moat vs other ecosystems; the model becomes a template for funding security public goods elsewhereOverreach (fund tries to do too much); incentives misaligned with user outcomes (metrics theater); political friction between ecosystem stakeholders over prioritiesAdverse case: Controversy dominatesPublic disputes over claim eligibility/legitimacy of “edge-case” funds; multisig/validator incident or operational failure; renewed attention to regulatory baggage (DAO-as-security narratives); stalled or chaotic grant roundsNarrative flips from “security endowment” to “the DAO controversy returns,” chilling perception even if funds remain safe; governance becomes the headline instead of security outcomesGovernance legitimacy risk (who decides, why them?); operational security risk (key management, validator setup); reputational/regulatory amplification of any misstepFor now, it is up to watch on-chain balances of ExtraBalance, the Curator multisig, and WithdrawDAO to track how much gets staked versus left for claims.

Other metrics to monitor include staking yield regime shifts to estimate annual security budget size, grant-round design, and retrospectives to assess whether allocation improves, and alignment with Ethereum Foundation priorities to see if funds go where the EF identifies the biggest security return on investment.

TheDAO's return isn't a second act. It is the conversion of Ethereum's most painful lesson into its most durable security infrastructure.

Mentioned in this articlePosted in

Bitcoin dropped to No. 11 on the global “assets by market cap” leaderboard, according to CompaniesMarketCap data reviewed on Jan. 30, 2026, pushing it outside the top 10 tier.

The ranking shows Bitcoin at about $1.653T in market value, below Saudi Aramco at about $1.663T, and behind Meta Platforms and TSMC at roughly $1.867T and $1.761T, respectively. Bitcoin’s listed price was $82,759, with a -5.86% move in the “Price (30 days)” column, while Broadcom and Tesla followed at about $1.568T and $1.563T.

Next, market participants will monitor whether a market cap rebound can re-rate Bitcoin back above the $1.663T threshold and restore a top 10 position, as the table continues to reshuffle across large-cap equities, commodities, ETFs, and crypto.

Source: CompaniesMarketCap.

Disclaimer: Crypto Economy Flash News are based on verified public and official sources. Their purpose is to provide fast, factual updates about relevant events in the crypto and blockchain ecosystem.

This information does not constitute financial advice or investment recommendation. Readers are encouraged to verify all details through official project channels before making any related decisions.

TL;DR

Ethereum transaction fees fell to their lowest level since 2017, with the average cost per transaction dropping from $200 to $0.14. The decline follows the transition to Proof-of-Stake, the Fusaka and Dencun upgrades, and an increase in the per-block gas limit from 30 million to 36 million. Activity shifted toward Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Base, while the base layer posted a record with more than 16 million monthly transactions. Ethereum transaction fees fell to their lowest level since 2017. The average cost per transaction dropped from peaks near $200 during the 2021–2022 cycle to $0.14 in 2026, according to Glassnode data. The decline coincides with a record high in transaction volume on the base layer.

The adjustment reflects a sequence of technical changes introduced since 2021. The transition to Proof-of-Stake reshaped Ethereum’s validation structure and removed direct reliance on transaction fees as the primary revenue source for protocol security. This was followed by the Fusaka and Dencun upgrades, which expanded processing capacity and improved block space efficiency. In addition, validators agreed to raise the per-block gas limit from 30 million to 36 million, increasing the number of transactions included in each block.

The Role of L2 Solutions Activity also shifted toward scaling solutions. Layer 2 networks such as Arbitrum and Base absorbed a significant share of transactional flow, easing congestion on mainnet. This shift supported higher aggregate throughput without pushing fees higher on the base layer.

Historical data shows a gradual decline. After falling below $2 in November 2022, fees rebounded to $35 in March 2024. From February 2025 onward, the metric entered a concurrent downtrend. Over the same period, the total amount paid to validators dropped from a peak of 25,668 ETH, roughly $77 million, to a weekly average of 153 ETH, about $450,000.

Ethereum Records Around 16 Million Monthly Transactions Despite the adjustment, Ethereum’s base-layer activity reached an all-time high. In January, monthly transaction volume exceeded 16 million. Compared with 2021, the network now processes nearly three times as many transactions at a substantially lower unit cost.

Ethereum’s validator economics remain anchored in staking rewards, with yields near 3% annually. Transaction fees and MEV play a secondary role within that structure. This setup also lowers operating costs for onchain infrastructure layers, such as oracles and data availability systems, which rely on frequent updates.

At present, ETH trades around $2,714, down 7.7% over the past 24 hours. The price remains close to levels seen a year ago, after surpassing $4,770 in August 2025

Ethereum’s ETH BTC ratio has started rebounding after a multi year slide, while spot ETH still trades below broken support. Together, the charts point to rotation back into Ethereum, but with downside risk toward $1,900–$1,700 still on the table.

ETH BTC Ratio Rebounds After Multi Year DeclineEthereum’s price relative to Bitcoin has begun to recover after a prolonged multi year decline, according to weekly chart data from Binance. The ETH BTC pair formed a broad base after trending lower since 2022, with price recently rebounding from a long held demand zone that previously marked cycle lows. The move followed a final downside sweep that cleared remaining sell pressure and short side liquidity before reversing higher.

Ethereum/Bitcoin 1-Week Chart. Source: Binance/X

The recovery shows a shift in market structure. After years of lower highs and persistent weakness, ETH BTC has started printing higher lows, suggesting downside momentum has slowed. Capital rotation appears to be improving as the ratio holds above its base and attempts to build acceptance at higher levels. This behavior contrasts with earlier rebounds that failed quickly and rolled back into the downtrend.

If the current structure holds, the chart points to a continuation scenario rather than a short term bounce. The absence of strong selling on recent pullbacks suggests long term distribution has eased. As a result, ETH BTC may continue stair stepping higher toward prior resistance zones, with further upside possible if capital flows into Ethereum remain stable against Bitcoin.

Trader Flags $1,900–$1,700 as Long-Term ETH Buy ZoneAn unknown trader shared a long-term Ethereum outlook on X, pointing to a potential buying zone between $1,900 and $1,700. The view comes as ETH continues to trade below prior support, with price recently hovering near the $2,700 area on the TradingView chart dated Jan. 30.

Ethereum Price Chart. Source: TradingView/X

The chart shows Ethereum in a broader downtrend from late 2025 highs, followed by a breakdown into early 2026. The trader’s projection marks a deeper pullback toward the $1,900–$1,700 range, where previous demand and historical price reactions are visible.

According to the post, the highlighted zone could act as a long-term accumulation area if price revisits it, before any potential recovery attempt later in the cycle. The scenario suggests short-term weakness first, followed by a rebound once lower support levels are tested.

Ethereum is facing renewed downside pressure after breaking below the $2,700 level, reigniting concerns over a deeper correction. The second-largest cryptocurrency has now lost more than 7% in a single day and is down over 40% from recent highs, reflecting a broader shift toward risk-off sentiment across crypto markets.

Market liquidity remains thin, institutional demand is weakening, and selling pressure continues to dominate short-term price action, setting the stage for heightened volatility.

Peter Brandt Flags Further Downside RiskVeteran trader Peter Brandt has added to the cautious outlook, warning that Ethereum’s recent technical breakdown could lead to further losses. Sharing chart analysis, Brandt pointed to a completed symmetrical triangle breakdown on Ethereum’s price chart, a pattern typically associated with bearish continuation.

Beyond ETH itself, Brandt also highlighted weakness across the broader crypto market. His analysis of total crypto market capitalization shows a drop to key support near $2.82 trillion. A sustained failure at this level, he warned, could drag total market value toward $2.41 trillion, implying a potential 15–20% market-wide decline that could pressure major assets including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP.

ETF Outflows Add to Selling PressureInstitutional sentiment around Ethereum remains fragile, as reflected in continued outflows from spot Ethereum ETFs. On Thursday alone, ETH ETFs recorded nearly $156 million in net redemptions, led by Fidelity and BlackRock products. Grayscale’s Ethereum funds also saw notable withdrawals.

These outflows suggest that large investors are still de-risking, reinforcing Brandt’s view that Ethereum’s weakness is tied more to liquidity stress and capital rotation than isolated technical issues.

Vitalik Buterin Moves 16,384 ETHAdding another layer to the narrative, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently withdrew 16,384 ETH. While such movements often raise short-term market concerns, Buterin clarified that the funds are intended to support Ethereum’s long-term development and sustainability.

According to Buterin, the ETH will help fund an aggressive roadmap focused on scalability, decentralization, and security, while also supporting the Ethereum Foundation’s core mission. He has also signaled interest in improving decentralized staking structures to better align rewards with Ethereum’s long-term goals.

Key Support Levels in FocusEthereum’s price action continues to reflect a market stuck in limbo rather than one gearing up for a decisive move. Analysts note that ETH has been locked in a broad, well-defined range between roughly $2,600 and $3,350 for the past two months, with no clear trend emerging on higher timeframes. This prolonged consolidation has created what some describe as a forced equilibrium, where neither bulls nor bears have enough conviction to take control. 

Without a clean breakout above resistance or a confirmed breakdown below support, recent price swings are viewed as short-term liquidity rotations rather than the start of a new cycle. For now, Ethereum remains in a macro stalemate, trading around $2,798 and down about 5% on the week, as the market continues to wait for a decisive signal.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

FAQsWhy is Ethereum’s price falling today?

Ethereum is dropping due to weak liquidity, ETF outflows, and a broader risk-off mood, not because of a fundamental breakdown in the network.

How do Ethereum ETF outflows impact ETH price?

ETF outflows signal institutional de-risking, which adds selling pressure and often amplifies short-term price volatility in Ethereum.

What are the key support levels to watch for Ethereum?

ETH is holding a range between roughly $2,600 and $3,350. A clear break below support or above resistance may set the next trend.

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

The market keeps going down today, according to CoinMarketCap.

Top coins by CoinMarketCapSHIB/USDThe rate of SHIB is almost unchanged since yesterday.

Image by TradingViewOn the hourly chart, the price of SHIB is rising after a false breakout of the local support at $0.00000711. If the daily bar closes near the resistance or above it, the upward move is likely to continue to the $0.00000750 range.

Image by TradingViewOn the longer time frame, the situation is less bullish. The rate of SHIB is far from main levels, which means neither bulls nor bears are dominating. 

You Might Also Like

In this case, sideways trading in the zone of $0.00000720-$0.00000750 is the most likely scenario this week.

Image by TradingViewFrom the midterm point of view, sellers remain more powerful than buyers as the price of SHIB has not bounced back far from the support at $0.00000678. In this case, traders may witness an ongoing correction at the beginning of next month.

SHIB is trading at $0.00000731 at press time.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

The market is back to the red zone at the end of the week, according to CoinStats.

DOGE chart by CoinStatsDOGE/USDThe price of DOGE has dropped by 2.36% over the last 24 hours.

Image by TradingViewOn the hourly chart, the rate of DOGE is in the middle of the local channel, between the support at $0.1121 and the resistance at $0.1177. As none of the sides is dominating, there are low chances of seeing sharp moves by tomorrow.

Image by TradingViewOn the longer time frame, the price of DOGE has made a false breakout of the yesterday's bar low at $0.1144. 

You Might Also Like

If the daily bar closes far from that mark, traders may expect a local correction to the $0.12 zone.

Image by TradingViewFrom the midterm point of view, there are no reversal signals yet. If the weekly bar closes around the current price or below, the decline may continue to the $0.095-$0.10 range.

DOGE is trading at $0.1145 at press time.

Tech stocks fell after Microsoft’s drop, pulling Bitcoin and crypto lower. Traders cut risk as liquidations rose and money moved into gold and silver. Bitcoin price fell sharply, and at the same time, Microsoft’s stock dropped about 11% after the company reported slower growth and higher costs. This made the investors worry about the global economy and led them to sell risky assets like tech stocks and cryptocurrencies. 

The Bitcoin price has dropped 6%, which has led to around 270,000 trading accounts being liquidated in 24 hours. More than 90% of the liquidation positions are long trades. As the bitcoin price fell quickly, most losses occurred very fast, which caused high market volatility and panic selling. 

Global Tension brings Market Pressure Rising global tensions in the Middle East also increased fear in the financial market. The recent statement from President Donald Trump and the concerns over the tariffs linked to the oil trade. As the stocks and Crypto are declining due to these factors. The investors are shifting their assets into Gold and Silver. Analysts noted that people are choosing safe assets instead of the risky ones. 

Market analysts say that Bitcoin is testing its key support level, and some experts think that the fall is overdone, and the prices were already falling before this event. Others warn that the price will fall more if the global stress continues, and right now, the market is cautious and unstable.

This event shows that the Bitcoin prices still control the tech stocks, and global news and big company earnings still affect the crypto prices. For the long term traders, volatility is normal, and fear-driven selloffs happen often.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Ethereum Foundation Unveils Multi-Year Austerity Plan

Fri, 30/01/2026 - 16:08

Key XRP Ledger escrow amendment hits activation timer, with more changes to come in the coming days.

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

The XRP Ledger Escrow amendment is now officially in an activation period, according to RippleX engineer Mayukha Vadari, who recently shared an update with the XRP community.

Vet, an XRP Ledger validator, shared this update with the crypto community. The Token Escrow amendment has hit the two-week activation timer after gaining a 82.35% consensus with 28 "yes" votes. The potential activation date for the token escrow amendment is Feb. 12, 2026, at 9:21:01 p.m. UTC, according to xrpscan data, with a current countdown of 13 days, 6 hours.

Vet revealed his expectations on Token Escrow, which he says will allows users to escrow any token issued on the XRP Ledger, including RLUSD, meme coins and real world assets, highlighting it as an important tool for the ecosystem.

The Token Escrow amendment enhances the existing escrow functionality on the XRP Ledger by enabling support for both Trustline-based tokens (IOUs) and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs). This amendment introduces changes to ledger objects, transactions and transaction processing logic to allow escrows to use IOU tokens and MPTs, while respecting issuer controls and maintaining ledger integrity.

HOT Stories

In simple terms, the Token Escrow amendment extends escrow functionality to fungible tokens, enabling Trustline Tokens and Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs) to be held in escrow.

XRP Ledger welcomes new releaseThis week, XRP Ledger welcomed a new XRPL version 3.1.0, which includes Single Asset Vaults, the Lending Protocol and bug fixes.

The SingleAssetVault amendment adds vaults, which pool a single asset for use with the Lending Protocol. The Lending Protocol adds the ability to create loans on the XRP Ledger. fixBatchInnerSigs fixes an issue in which the inner transactions of a Batch transaction would be flagged as having valid signatures, as inner transactions never have valid signatures. These amendments are currently being voted upon by the XRP community.

The fix amendments from XRPL version 3.0.0 went live on XRP Ledger mainnet. These include fixTokenEscrowV1, fixIncludeKeyletFields, fixMPTDeliveredAmount, fixAMMClawbackRounding and fixPriceOracleOrder. The fixTokenEscrowV1 corrected a minor accounting error in MPT escrows.

The permissioned domains amendment has also achieved a majority, with the current countdown now 4 days, 18 hours, according to xrpscan data.

Related articles

TL;DR

Mainnet Launch: Lido activated stVaults on Ethereum, enabling customizable staking environments that let institutions, protocols, and L2s build tailored setups while using Lido’s liquidity. Early Integrations: Linea, Nansen, and multiple institutional validators adopted stVaults to deploy features like Native Yield, analytics‑enhanced staking products, and dedicated validator configurations. Customization Focus: stVaults support adjustable fees, compliance controls, and isolated security boundaries, offering institution‑grade staking while remaining connected to stETH and Lido’s broader DeFi integrations.
Lido has pushed its long‑anticipated stVaults system to the Ethereum mainnet, marking a pivotal shift in how staking products are built and deployed. After nearly a year of testing with institutional validators, data firms, and Layer 2 networks, the upgrade opens the protocol’s infrastructure to external builders seeking customizable staking environments. The launch reflects a broader move in Ethereum staking toward modular, specialized setups that preserve liquidity while offering tailored configurations for different users.

Lido V3 is live on Ethereum mainnet, introducing stVaults:

Modular staking infrastructure for builders, powered by stETH.https://t.co/A6vpfysrXp

↓ pic.twitter.com/RpQxRXtWH8

— Lido (@LidoFinance) January 30, 2026

A New Modular Staking Framework stVaults were introduced in Lido’s V3 upgrade as non‑custodial smart contracts that let institutions, protocols, and rollups design purpose‑built staking setups. Instead of relying on a single uniform product, users can create isolated vaults that stake ETH through selected node operators while retaining access to stETH. Lido said the release represents a structural shift, reducing the need for teams to bootstrap validators, integrations, and liquidity from scratch when launching new staking products.

The mainnet rollout includes several day 1 partners such as P2P.org, Chorus One, Pier Two, and Sentora with Kiln, alongside institutional stakers like Solstice, Twinstake, Northstake, and Everstake. Many participated in Lido’s early adopter program. Over the past year, firms have already used the stack to launch new products. Linea deployed a Native Yield feature that stakes bridged ETH in a protocol‑controlled vault, while Nansen combined stVaults with stETH‑based DeFi strategies.

Customization, Compliance, and Institutional Demand Lido emphasized that stVaults can be configured for varied needs, including fee structures, risk profiles, and compliance requirements. Teams can adjust validator setups, deposit and withdrawal checks, and operational controls. P2P.org uses the system for institution‑ready validator configurations, while Solstice highlighted the importance of segregation and traceability as institutional participation grows. The firm is testing a proof‑of‑concept with AMINA Bank, demonstrating how stVaults support dedicated, onchain staking environments.

stVaults operate alongside Lido’s core protocol and remain opt‑in and isolated, limiting security risks for other users. Lido, launched in 2020, aims to democratize staking by allowing participation without the full 32 ETH required to run a node. Its liquid staking token stETH, which accrues Ethereum rewards, has become widely used across DeFi. stETH holds a market cap of nearly $27 billion, representing roughly a quarter of all liquid staking tokens in circulation.

Have you been paying attention to shares of Valmont Industries (VMI - Free Report) ? Shares have been on the move with the stock up 11.3% over the past month. The stock hit a new 52-week high of $452.1 in the previous session. Valmont has gained 11.3% since the start of the year compared to the 20.5% gain for the Zacks Industrial Products sector and the 24.2% return for the Zacks Steel - Pipe and Tube industry.

What's Driving the Outperformance?The stock has a great record of positive earnings surprises, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the last four quarters. In its last earnings report on October 21, 2025, Valmont reported EPS of $4.98 versus consensus estimate of $4.64.

For the current fiscal year, Valmont is expected to post earnings of $21.25 per share on $4.11 in revenues. Meanwhile, for the next fiscal year, the company is expected to earn $23.73 per share on $4.28 in revenues. This represents a year-over-year change of 11.08% and 4.09%, respectively.

Valuation MetricsThough Valmont has recently hit a 52-week high, what is next for Valmont? A key aspect of this question is taking a look at valuation metrics in order to determine if the company is due for a pullback from this level.

On this front, we can look at the Zacks Style Scores, as these give investors a variety of ways to comb through stocks (beyond looking at the Zacks Rank of a security). These styles are represented by grades running from A to F in the categories of Value, Growth, and Momentum, while there is a combined VGM Score as well. The idea behind the style scores is to help investors pick the most appropriate Zacks Rank stocks based on their individual investment style.

Valmont has a Value Score of C. The stock's Growth and Momentum Scores are A and D, respectively, giving the company a VGM Score of B.

In terms of its value breakdown, the stock currently trades at 21.1X current fiscal year EPS estimates, which is a premium to the peer industry average of 17.2X. On a trailing cash flow basis, the stock currently trades at 20.4X versus its peer group's average of 17.6X. This isn't enough to put the company in the top echelon of all stocks we cover from a value perspective.

Zacks RankWe also need to look at the Zacks Rank for the stock, as this supersedes any trend on the style score front. Fortunately, Valmont currently has a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy) thanks to favorable earnings estimate revisions from covering analysts.

Since we recommend that investors select stocks carrying Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) and Style Scores of A or B, it looks as if Valmont fits the bill. Thus, it seems as though Valmont shares could still be poised for more gains ahead.

Shares of APi (APG - Free Report) have been strong performers lately, with the stock up 10.4% over the past month. The stock hit a new 52-week high of $43.75 in the previous session. APi has gained 10.4% since the start of the year compared to the -11.6% move for the Zacks Business Services sector and the -16.8% return for the Zacks Business - Services industry.

What's Driving the Outperformance?The stock has a great record of positive earnings surprises, having beaten the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the last four quarters. In its last earnings report on October 30, 2025, APi reported EPS of $0.41 versus consensus estimate of $0.39.

For the current fiscal year, APi is expected to post earnings of $1.66 per share on $7.88 in revenues. Meanwhile, for the next fiscal year, the company is expected to earn $1.82 per share on $8.43 in revenues. This represents a year-over-year change of 14.66% and 6.9%, respectively.

Valuation MetricsThough APi has recently hit a 52-week high, what is next for APi? A key aspect of this question is taking a look at valuation metrics in order to determine if the company is due for a pullback from this level.

On this front, we can look at the Zacks Style Scores, as these give investors a variety of ways to comb through stocks (beyond looking at the Zacks Rank of a security). The individual style scores for Value, Growth, Momentum and the combined VGM Score run from A through F. Investors should consider the style scores a valuable tool that can help you to pick the most appropriate Zacks Rank stocks based on their individual investment style.

APi has a Value Score of C. The stock's Growth and Momentum Scores are A and C, respectively, giving the company a VGM Score of A.

In terms of its value breakdown, the stock currently trades at 25.5X current fiscal year EPS estimates, which is a premium to the peer industry average of 19.4X. On a trailing cash flow basis, the stock currently trades at 13.7X versus its peer group's average of 13.3X. This isn't enough to put the company in the top echelon of all stocks we cover from a value perspective.

Zacks RankWe also need to look at the Zacks Rank for the stock, as this supersedes any trend on the style score front. Fortunately, APi currently has a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy) thanks to a solid earnings estimate revision trend.

Since we recommend that investors select stocks carrying Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) or 2 (Buy) and Style Scores of A or B, it looks as if APi fits the bill. Thus, it seems as though APi shares could have a bit more room to run in the near term.

Key Takeaways Kimball Electronics will report Q2 results Feb. 4, with sales seen down 4.2% year over year.KE's expanding medical manufacturing footprint is expected to support performance in the quarter.Softness across the automotive and industrial segments may weigh on overall results. Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE - Free Report) is scheduled to report second-quarter fiscal 2026 results on Feb. 4, after market close.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for sales is pegged at $342.5 million, indicating a 4.2% decline from the prior-year quarter’s reported figure.

The consensus mark for earnings is pegged at 28 cents per share, suggesting a year-over-year decline of 3.5%.

Kimball Electronics’ earnings surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 49.71%.

Let’s see how things might have shaped up prior to the announcement.

Factors Likely to Influence KE’s Q2 ResultsKimball Electronics’ second-quarter numbers are likely to reflect benefits from its focus on expanding in the high-growth medical contract manufacturing space. The new 300,000 sq. ft. facility in Indianapolis has positioned KE as a key player in the medical product manufacturing domain.

Steady demand for medical devices due to a rise in the aging population, growing access to healthcare and connected drug-delivery systems, combined with the miniaturization of medical devices, has been driving the demand for medical products. With its enhanced production capacity, Kimball Electronics is anticipated to have capitalized on this opportunity during the to-be-reported quarter.

Kimball Electronics is also bringing operational improvements and cost discipline by reducing inventory, cash conversion cycle, and selling, general & administrative expenses. The company has also reduced its debts significantly, which helped lower its interest expenses. These factors are likely to have positively impacted the bottom line in the to-be-reported quarter.

However, industry-wide softness across the automotive and industrial segments is expected to have more than offset the benefits of strong performance in the medical division. Heavy dependence on a few large medical and automotive customers is an added concern for the company.

Earnings Whispers for Kimball Electronics StockOur proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for KE this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat, which is not the case here.

Though Kimball Electronics carries a Zacks Rank #3, it has an Earnings ESP of 0.00% at present. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.

Stocks to ConsiderHere are some companies worth considering, as our model indicates that they possess the right combination of factors to exceed earnings expectations in their upcoming releases:

Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +2.18% and sports a Zacks Rank #1 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

Microchip Technology is set to report third-quarter fiscal 2026 results on Feb. 5. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for MCHP’s third-quarter earnings is pegged at $1.51 per share. The estimate has moved north 6 cents over the past 30 days, indicating an increase of 15.3% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure.

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +3.67% and a Zacks Rank #2 at present.

Lattice Semiconductor is set to report fourth-quarter 2025 results on Feb. 10. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for LSCC’s fourth-quarter earnings is pegged at $1.05 per share, unchanged over the past 60 days, indicating an increase of 16.7% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure.

Cloudflare Inc. (NET - Free Report) has an Earnings ESP of +0.20% and a Zacks Rank #3 at present.

Cloudflare is slated to report fourth-quarter 2025 results on Feb. 10. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NET’s fourth-quarter earnings is pegged at 92 cents per share, revised upward by a penny over the past 30 days, indicating a rise of 22.7% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure.

Key Takeaways MSFT shares fell 10% after Q2 results, as elevated capex spooked investors.Microsoft delivered double-digit EPS and revenue growth, led by 39% growth in Azure.ETFs like IYW offer exposure to Microsoft's cloud and software growth while spreading stock-specific risk. Shares of cloud giant Microsoft (MSFT - Free Report) slumped 10% at the bourses yesterday, despite the company comfortably surpassing analysts’ expectations for second-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings and revenues. The decline was most likely triggered by the company’s higher-than-expected capital expenditure in the fourth quarter and slowing cloud growth expectations. 

This pullback presents an opportune moment for investors who remain optimistic about Microsoft Cloud’s growth prospects, with this business having surpassed $50 billion in revenues for the first time in the fourth quarter. 

However, one must be mindful of the fact that the company is currently facing significant capacity constraints regarding its data centers and AI infrastructure, which might restrict the desired return from its enormous investments in AI and thereby affect its financials. 

Against this backdrop, investors seeking to benefit from MSFT’s growth in cloud computing and software, while avoiding the stock’s idiosyncratic risk, may consider investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with heavy exposure to Microsoft. This would give the investors exposure to Microsoft's growth while spreading risk across other leading firms from technology and other industries.

Now, before diving into the specifics of such ETFs, let us do a detailed analysis of how Microsoft performed in the fiscal second quarter in terms of other metrics.

A Brief Analysis of MSFT’s Q2 ResultsMicrosoft’s fiscal second-quarter adjusted earnings per share (EPS) beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.7%, while its revenues topped the consensus mark by 1.3%. On a year-over-year basis, the company delivered a solid performance, with both its top and bottom lines rising in double digits.

Microsoft witnessed a solid year-over-year increase in revenues from all its products in the fourth quarter, except Xbox Content and Services. 

In particular, Azure and other cloud services revenues grew 39%, driven by demand for MSFT’s portfolio of services with continued growth across all workloads. On the other hand, Microsoft 365 Commercial products and cloud services revenues increased 16%, while Microsoft 365 Consumer products and cloud services revenue improved 27%. Moreover, LinkedIn revenues went up 11% on the back of Marketing Solutions growth. 

Looking ahead, Microsoft expects to generate revenues in the range of $80.65-$81.75 billion, which lies higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $80.47 billion, in the fiscal third quarter.  Strong growth across its commercial businesses is expected to boost this revenue performance in the ongoing quarter. 

On a dismal note, the company expects its Microsoft Cloud gross margin percentage to go down year over year to roughly 65%, on account of continued investments in AI. Its Xbox content and services revenues are also projected to decline in the mid-single digits in the fiscal third quarter.

Analysts’ ReactionJPMorgan analyst Mark Murphy maintained an Overweight rating on Microsoft but lowered the price target from $575 to $550, citing his concern about the company’s limitation in terms of CPU supply constraints, which might affect the growth of Azure (as cited in Finviz). 

In the same line of action, Goldman Sachs analyst Gabriela Borges maintained a Buy rating and lowered the price target from $655 to $600.    

Microsoft-Heavy ETFs to BuyiShares Dow Jones US Technology ETF (IYW - Free Report)  

This fund, with net assets worth $21.06 billion, offers exposure to 141 U.S. electronics, computer software and hardware, and information technology companies. Of these, Microsoft carries the third spot, holding 12.32% of the fund. Tech giants, Nvidia (NVDA - Free Report) and Apple (AAPL - Free Report) hold the first and second spots in this fund, respectively, with 17.20% and 14.39% weightage. 

IYW has surged 25.9% over the past year. The fund charges 38 basis points (bps) as fees. Its volume is good at an average of 982,393 shares a day. This fund sports a Zacks ETF Rank #1 (Strong Buy). 

iShares Top 20 U.S. Stocks ETF (TOPT - Free Report)  

This fund, with net assets worth $486.3 million, provides exposure to the 21 largest U.S. companies by market capitalization within the S&P 500 Index. Of these, Microsoft carries the third spot, holding 11.23% of the fund. NVDA and AAPL hold the first and second spots in this fund, respectively, with 16.30% and 13.30% weightage. 

TOPT has soared 17% over the past year. The fund charges 20 bps as fees. Its volume is at an average of 445,954 shares a day. This fund holds a Zacks ETF Rank #1.

Select Sector SPDR Technology ETF (XLK - Free Report)  

This fund, with assets under management (AUM) worth $94.07 billion, offers exposure to 70 companies from technology hardware, storage and peripherals; software; communications equipment; semiconductors and semiconductor equipment; IT services; and electronic equipment, instruments and components industries. Of these, Microsoft carries the third spot, holding 11.38% of the fund. NVDA and AAPL hold the first and second spots in this fund, respectively, with 14.80% and 12.05% weightage. 

XLK has rallied 26.5% over the past year. The fund charges 8 bps as fees. It traded at a volume of 25.58 million shares in the last trading session. This fund holds a Zacks ETF Rank #1. 

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT - Free Report)  

This fund, with net assets worth $112.8 billion, offers exposure to 320 companies that provide technology software and services, technology hardware and equipment, as well as manufacturers of semiconductor and semiconductor equipment. Of these, Microsoft carries the third spot, holding 12.19% of the fund. NVDA and AAPL hold the first and second spots in this fund, respectively, with 17.47% and 14.89% weightage. 

VGT has soared 22.8% over the past year. The fund charges 9 bps as fees. Its volume is at an average of 523,321 shares a day. This fund holds a Zacks ETF Rank #1.

Key Takeaways META jumped 10.4% after delivering better-than-expected Q4 earnings and issuing upbeat sales guidance.META reported EPS of $8.88 and revenues of $59.89B, both beating estimates with solid year-over-year growth. ETFs like IXP offer diversified exposure to META while reducing single-stock and regulatory risks. Shares of Meta Platforms (META - Free Report) jumped 10.4% at the bourses yesterday, following the company’s better-than-expected fourth-quarter 2025 results. The Facebook-owner also issued better-than-expected sales and capital expenditure guidance, which must have contributed to investor optimism in this stock and thus got duly reflected in its double-digit share price hike. 

Considering such an upbeat outlook, investors might feel excited to grab more shares of META right away. However, some may remain concerned about the company’s Reality Labs unit, which reported an operating loss of $6.02 billion, exceeding analysts’ projection of $5.67 billion (as mentioned by CNBC). 

With META’s management expecting the Reality Labs unit to incur similar losses this year, and with regulatory headwinds in the European Union and the United States that could potentially lead to material business losses, some investors may remain skeptical about adding the stock to their portfolios.

While this slump may disappoint investors, it could be short-lived, given the company’s upbeat guidance for the final quarter of the year. In fact, investors interested in this stock might view the current dip as a golden opportunity to buy in and potentially profit later. 

Therefore, for investors who would like to gain from META’s surge, yet don’t want to be exposed to the unique regulatory and single-stock volatility that META carries, a more prudent strategy could be to consider exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with significant exposure to Meta Platforms. This approach allows investors to capture potential upside while mitigating company-specific risks that could severely impact profits during times of unprecedented crisis.

But before diving straight into these ETFs, let us check Meta’s overall performance in the fourth quarter, in terms of other metrics.

A Brief Analysis of META’s Q4 ResultsMETA’s earnings of $8.88 per share comfortably surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $8.21, while revenues of $59.89 billion beat the consensus mark by $1.3 million. On a year-over-year basis, both earnings and revenues improved at double-digit rates.

The company ended the fourth quarter with 6% year-over-year growth in employees, driven by hiring in priority areas of monetization, infrastructure, Meta Superintelligence Labs as well as regulation and compliance.

In terms of innovation, META launched a new run-time model across Instagram Feed stories and reels, which resulted in a 3% increase in conversion rates in the fourth quarter. It also doubled the number of GPUs used to train its GEM model for ads ranking, in addition to adopting a new sequence learning model architecture. The combined GEM and sequence-learning improvements drove a 3.5% increase in ad clicks on Facebook and more than 1% gain in conversions on Instagram in the fourth quarter.

Looking ahead, META projects to generate revenues in the range of $53.5-$56.5 billion in the first quarter of 2026. This revenue projection by META is quite higher than the consensus estimate of $51.38 billion. Its 2026 capital expenditure projection also remains robust in the range of $115-$135 billion, driven by increased investment to support Meta Superintelligence Labs efforts and its core business.

Further, META’s management expects its ongoing investments to drive additional gains in 2026 as the company continues to integrate AI across all layers of the marketing and customer engagement funnel.

META-Heavy ETFs to WatchiShares Global Comm Services ETF (IXP - Free Report)

This fund, with net assets worth $739.8 million, offers exposure to 68 companies that provide media, entertainment, social media, search engine, video/gaming and telecommunication services. Of these, META carries the first spot, holding 22.65% of the fund. The fund holds both Alphabet Class A (GOOGL - Free Report) and Class C (GOOG - Free Report) shares, which occupy the second and third spots, respectively. When combined, Alphabet represents over 23.09% of the fund’s total weight. 

IXP has surged 21.8% over the past year. The fund charges 40 basis points (bps) as fees.  It traded at a volume of 0.05 million shares in the last trading session. 

Vanguard Communication Services ETF (VOX - Free Report)

This fund, with net assets worth $6.3 billion, offers exposure to 119 U.S. companies within the communication services sector. Of these, META carries the first spot, holding 23.12% of the fund. Alphabet’s two share classes hold the second and third spots in this fund, with a combined weightage of 23.56%.

VOX has rallied 20.7% over the past year. The fund charges 9 bps as fees. It traded at a volume of 0.26 million shares in the last trading session. 

Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC - Free Report)

This fund, with assets under management (AUM) worth $27.74 billion, offers exposure to 23 companies from the telecommunication services, media, entertainment and interactive media & services industries. Of these, META carries the first spot, holding 20.26% of the fund. Alphabet’s two share classes hold the first and second spot in this fund, with a combined weightage of 20.80%.

XLC has gained 17.5% over the past year. The fund charges 8 bps as fees. It traded at a volume of 9.73 million shares in the last trading session.

Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC - Free Report)

This fund, with net assets worth $88.9 million, offers exposure to 26 U.S. companies in the communication services sector. Of these, META carries the third spot, holding 23.21% of the fund. Alphabet’s two share classes hold the first and second spots in this fund, with a combined weightage of 53.31%.

GXPC has soared 25.8% over the past year. The fund charges 15 bps as fees. It traded at a volume of 0.06 million shares in the last trading session.

Key Takeaways VLY reported Q4 adjusted EPS of 31 cents, beating estimates and rising sharply from the prior-year quarter.Valley National revenues climbed 14.1% as net interest income and fee income surged, boosting profitability.VLY saw loans & deposits growth, while credit quality was mixed with higher NPAs but sharply lower provisions. Shares of Valley National Bancorp (VLY - Free Report) rallied 3.3% in yesterday’s trading session on better-than-expected quarterly results. Its fourth-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of 31 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 29 cents. The bottom line also compared favorably with 13 cents in the year-ago quarter.

Results were primarily aided by increased net interest income (NII) and non-interest income, along with lower provision. Higher loan and deposit balances were another tailwind. However, elevated expenses remained as the undermining factor.

Quarterly results excluded non-core income and charges. After considering these, net income was $195.4 million, which surged 68.9% from the year-ago quarter.

For 2025, adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of 99 cents beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 97 cents. The figure represented a rise of 59.7% from the previous year. Net income (GAAP basis) was $598 million, up 57.3% year over year.

Valley National’s Revenues Improve, Expenses RiseQuarterly total revenues (fully-taxable-equivalent or FTE basis) were $542.5 million, up 14.1% year over year. The top line beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $524.7 million.

For 2025, total revenues (fully-taxable-equivalent or FTE basis) were $2.03 billion, up 9.3%. The top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.01 billion.

NII (FTE basis) was $466.1 million, up 9.9% year over year. The net interest margin (FTE basis) was 3.17%, which expanded 25 basis points (bps).

Non-interest income jumped 49.1% to $76.3 million. The rise was driven by an increase in almost all fee income components, except Insurance commissions, fees from loan servicing and higher net loss on sale of assets.

    Non-interest expenses of $299.4 million increased 7.5% year over year. Meanwhile, adjusted non-interest expenses rose 5% to $289.5 million.

The adjusted efficiency ratio was 53.49%, down from 57.21% in the prior-year quarter. A decline in the efficiency ratio indicates an improvement in profitability.

VLY’s Loans & Deposits RiseAs of Dec. 31, 2025, total loans were $50.1 billion, up 1.8% from the previous quarter. Total deposits were $52.2 billion, up 2%.

Valley National’s Credit Quality: A Mixed Bag

As of Dec. 31, 2025, total non-performing assets were $439.8 million, up 17.8% year over year. Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.19%, up 2 bps.

In the fourth quarter of 2025, VLY reported provision for credit losses of $20.1 million, which decreased 81.1% from the prior-year quarter.

VLY’s Profitability & Capital Ratios ImproveAt the end of the fourth quarter, adjusted annualized return on average assets was 1.14%, up from 0.48% in the year-earlier quarter. Adjusted annualized return on average shareholders’ equity was 9.33%, up from 4.17%.

As of Dec. 31, 2025, the tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was 8.82%, up from 8.40% in the corresponding period of 2024. Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 11.69%, up from 11.55%. Also, the common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 10.99% was up from 10.82% as of Dec. 31, 2024.

Valley National’s Share Repurchase UpdateIn the reported quarter, VLY repurchased 4.3 million shares at an average price of $10.93 under its ongoing stock buyback program.

Our Take on Valley NationalVLY’s effort to strengthen fee income, higher NII, solid loans and deposit growth and strategic expansion initiatives are expected to support its financials. However, persistently rising costs and weak asset quality are major concerns. Additionally, the company’s meaningful exposure to commercial real estate loans poses a risk.
 

Valley National currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Performance of VLY’s PeersZions Bancorporation’s (ZION - Free Report) fourth-quarter 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.75 beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.57. Moreover, the bottom line surged 30.5% from the year-ago quarter.

Zions’ results were primarily aided by higher NII and non-interest income. Growth in loan and deposit balances further supported performance. However, a rise in non-interest expenses was a headwind.

Bank OZK’s (OZK - Free Report) fourth-quarter 2025 EPS of $1.53 missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.56. The bottom line also declined 1.9% year over year.

OZK’s results were primarily hurt by higher provisions for credit losses and a rise in operating expenses. Nevertheless, solid NII and non-interest income growth acted as tailwinds. Healthy year-over-year growth in loans and deposits was another positive.

Wall Street analysts forecast that Suncor Energy (SU - Free Report) will report quarterly earnings of $0.77 per share in its upcoming release, pointing to a year-over-year decline of 13.5%. It is anticipated that revenues will amount to $8.48 billion, exhibiting a decrease of 5.1% compared to the year-ago quarter.

Over the past 30 days, the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been adjusted downward by 0.8% to its current level. This demonstrates the covering analysts' collective reassessment of their initial projections during this period.

Before a company announces its earnings, it is essential to take into account any changes made to earnings estimates. This is a valuable factor in predicting the potential reactions of investors toward the stock. Empirical research has consistently shown a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While investors typically use consensus earnings and revenue estimates as a yardstick to evaluate the company's quarterly performance, scrutinizing analysts' projections for some of the company's key metrics can offer a more comprehensive perspective.

Bearing this in mind, let's now explore the average estimates of specific Suncor Energy metrics that are commonly monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Total upstream production per day' at N/A. Compared to the present estimate, the company reported N/A in the same quarter last year.

It is projected by analysts that the 'Total refined product sales per day' will reach 638.78 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate is in contrast to the year-ago figure of 613.30 thousands of barrels of oil.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Sales Volumes per day - Total Oil Sands operations' of 844.94 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 820.60 thousands of barrels of oil.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Crude oil processed per day - Eastern North America' reaching 244.20 thousands of barrels of oil. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported 232.40 thousands of barrels of oil in the same quarter of the previous year.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Crude oil processed per day - Western North America' should come in at 259.86 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 253.80 thousands of barrels of oil.

Analysts predict that the 'Crude oil processed per day - Total' will reach 504.06 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 486.20 thousands of barrels of oil.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Production Volumes per day - Oil Sands operations - non-upgraded bitumen' will reach 288.10 thousands of barrels of oil. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported 273.90 thousands of barrels of oil in the same quarter of the previous year.

Analysts forecast 'Production Volumes per day - Oil Sands Operations - Upgraded (SCO and Diesel)' to reach 556.84 thousands of barrels of oil. Compared to the present estimate, the company reported 543.60 thousands of barrels of oil in the same quarter last year.

The consensus estimate for 'Sales Volumes per day - Oil Sands operations - Upgraded (SCO and Diesel)' stands at 556.84 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 538.30 thousands of barrels of oil.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Sales Volumes per day - Oil Sands operations - non-upgraded bitumen' should arrive at 288.10 thousands of barrels of oil. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported 282.30 thousands of barrels of oil in the same quarter of the previous year.

Analysts expect 'Production Volumes per day - Total Fort Hills bitumen production' to come in at 188.91 thousands of barrels of oil. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported 161.70 thousands of barrels of oil in the same quarter of the previous year.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Production Volumes per day - Total Syncrude production' will likely reach 198.34 thousands of barrels of oil. The estimate is in contrast to the year-ago figure of 214.90 thousands of barrels of oil.

View all Key Company Metrics for Suncor Energy here>>>

Suncor Energy shares have witnessed a change of +21% in the past month, in contrast to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.9% move. With a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), SU is expected closely follow the overall market performance in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Wall Street analysts forecast that Uber Technologies (UBER - Free Report) will report quarterly earnings of $0.79 per share in its upcoming release, pointing to a year-over-year decline of 75.4%. It is anticipated that revenues will amount to $14.28 billion, exhibiting an increase of 19.4% compared to the year-ago quarter.

The current level reflects a downward revision of 4.9% in the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter over the past 30 days. This demonstrates how the analysts covering the stock have collectively reappraised their initial projections over this period.

Prior to a company's earnings release, it is of utmost importance to factor in any revisions made to the earnings projections. These revisions serve as a critical gauge for predicting potential investor behaviors with respect to the stock. Empirical studies consistently reveal a strong link between trends in earnings estimate revisions and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While it's common for investors to rely on consensus earnings and revenue estimates for assessing how the business may have performed during the quarter, exploring analysts' forecasts for key metrics can yield valuable insights.

In light of this perspective, let's dive into the average estimates of certain Uber metrics that are commonly tracked and forecasted by Wall Street analysts.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Revenue- Mobility' will reach $8.27 billion. The estimate points to a change of +19.6% from the year-ago quarter.

Analysts predict that the 'Revenue- Freight' will reach $1.28 billion. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +0.2%.

Analysts forecast 'Revenue- Delivery' to reach $4.72 billion. The estimate suggests a change of +25% year over year.

Analysts expect 'Geographic Revenue- Latin America' to come in at $883.37 million. The estimate points to a change of +21.5% from the year-ago quarter.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Geographic Revenue- United States and Canada' should come in at $7.21 billion. The estimate suggests a change of +14.2% year over year.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Geographic Revenue- Europe, Middle East and Africa' should arrive at $4.23 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +17.9% from the prior-year quarter.

The consensus estimate for 'Geographic Revenue- Asia Pacific' stands at $1.58 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +18.7% from the prior-year quarter.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Gross Bookings - Total' at $53.08 billion. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of $44.20 billion.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Monthly Active Platform Consumers (MAPCs)' will likely reach 198 . The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 171 .

It is projected by analysts that the 'Trips' will reach 3,704 . Compared to the present estimate, the company reported 3,068 in the same quarter last year.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Gross Bookings - Delivery' of $24.76 billion. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of $20.13 billion.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Gross Bookings - Mobility' reaching $27.07 billion. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported $22.80 billion in the same quarter of the previous year.

View all Key Company Metrics for Uber here>>>

Shares of Uber have remained unchanged over the past month compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.9% change. With a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), UBER is expected to mirror the overall market performance in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Wall Street analysts expect AbbVie (ABBV - Free Report) to post quarterly earnings of $2.66 per share in its upcoming report, which indicates a year-over-year increase of 23.2%. Revenues are expected to be $16.36 billion, up 8.3% from the year-ago quarter.

The current level reflects an upward revision of 0.1% in the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter over the past 30 days. This demonstrates how the analysts covering the stock have collectively reappraised their initial projections over this period.

Before a company announces its earnings, it is essential to take into account any changes made to earnings estimates. This is a valuable factor in predicting the potential reactions of investors toward the stock. Empirical research has consistently shown a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While investors usually depend on consensus earnings and revenue estimates to assess the business performance for the quarter, delving into analysts' forecasts for certain key metrics often provides a more comprehensive understanding.

Bearing this in mind, let's now explore the average estimates of specific AbbVie metrics that are commonly monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Net Revenue- Imbruvica' should come in at $714.90 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -15.7%.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Net Revenue- Botox Therapeutic- Total' will reach $995.91 million. The estimate suggests a change of +14.1% year over year.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Net Revenue- Venclexta' reaching $725.34 million. The estimate suggests a change of +10.7% year over year.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Net Revenue- Neuroscience- Total' at $3.00 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +19.5% from the prior-year quarter.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Net Revenue- Humira- US' should arrive at $574.85 million. The estimate indicates a change of -53.9% from the prior-year quarter.

It is projected by analysts that the 'Net Revenue- Oncology- Elahere- Total' will reach $191.62 million. The estimate points to a change of +29.5% from the year-ago quarter.

Analysts expect 'Net Revenue- Humira- International' to come in at $374.40 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -14.1%.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Net Revenue- Epkinly- International' of $48.50 million. The estimate suggests a change of +120.5% year over year.

Analysts predict that the 'Net Revenue- Epkinly- U.S' will reach $26.75 million. The estimate indicates a change of +48.6% from the prior-year quarter.

Analysts forecast 'Net Revenue- Oncology- Elahere- US' to reach $164.60 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +12.7%.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Net Revenue- Qulipta- U.S.' will likely reach $271.58 million. The estimate points to a change of +46% from the year-ago quarter.

The consensus estimate for 'Net Revenue- Qulipta- International' stands at $39.74 million. The estimate suggests a change of +165% year over year.

View all Key Company Metrics for AbbVie here>>>

AbbVie shares have witnessed a change of -3.5% in the past month, in contrast to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.9% move. With a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), ABBV is expected closely follow the overall market performance in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Analysts on Wall Street project that Eli Lilly (LLY - Free Report) will announce quarterly earnings of $6.99 per share in its forthcoming report, representing an increase of 31.4% year over year. Revenues are projected to reach $17.87 billion, increasing 32.1% from the same quarter last year.

The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 8.6% lower over the last 30 days to the current level. This reflects how the analysts covering the stock have collectively reevaluated their initial estimates during this timeframe.

Ahead of a company's earnings disclosure, it is crucial to give due consideration to changes in earnings estimates. These revisions serve as a noteworthy factor in predicting potential investor reactions to the stock. Numerous empirical studies consistently demonstrate a strong relationship between trends in earnings estimate revision and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While investors typically rely on consensus earnings and revenue estimates to gauge how the business may have fared during the quarter, examining analysts' projections for some of the company's key metrics often helps gain a deeper insight.

Bearing this in mind, let's now explore the average estimates of specific Lilly metrics that are commonly monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts.

Analysts expect 'Net Sales- Cyramza (Ramucirumab /IMC-1121B)- Total' to come in at $256.17 million. The estimate points to a change of -0.9% from the year-ago quarter.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Net Sales- Humulin' of $204.25 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -27.1%.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Net Sales- Humalog' should come in at $570.03 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -8.1%.

Analysts predict that the 'Net Sales- Forteo' will reach $55.29 million. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of -10.3%.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Net Sales- Diabetes- Mounjaro - U.S.' will reach $3.77 billion. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +43.1%.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Revenue to unaffiliated customers- Outside U.S.' should arrive at $6.04 billion. The estimate points to a change of +34.1% from the year-ago quarter.

The consensus estimate for 'Geographic Revenue- United States' stands at $11.99 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +32.8% from the prior-year quarter.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Net Sales- US- Alimta' will likely reach $8.62 million. The estimate suggests a change of -31.1% year over year.

Analysts forecast 'Net Sales- US- Forteo' to reach $23.94 million. The estimate indicates a change of -12% from the prior-year quarter.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Net Sales- US- Humalog' reaching $353.37 million. The estimate suggests a change of -12.9% year over year.

It is projected by analysts that the 'Net Sales- Humulin- US' will reach $127.99 million. The estimate indicates a change of -25.2% from the prior-year quarter.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Net Sales- International- Alimta' at $19.48 million. The estimate points to a change of -26.2% from the year-ago quarter.

View all Key Company Metrics for Lilly here>>>

Over the past month, shares of Lilly have returned -4.7% versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.9% change. Currently, LLY carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), suggesting that its performance may align with the overall market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Wall Street analysts forecast that Boston Scientific (BSX - Free Report) will report quarterly earnings of $0.78 per share in its upcoming release, pointing to a year-over-year increase of 11.4%. It is anticipated that revenues will amount to $5.27 billion, exhibiting an increase of 15.4% compared to the year-ago quarter.

Over the last 30 days, there has been no revision in the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter. This signifies the covering analysts' collective reconsideration of their initial forecasts over the course of this timeframe.

Ahead of a company's earnings disclosure, it is crucial to give due consideration to changes in earnings estimates. These revisions serve as a noteworthy factor in predicting potential investor reactions to the stock. Numerous empirical studies consistently demonstrate a strong relationship between trends in earnings estimate revision and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While investors typically use consensus earnings and revenue estimates as indicators of quarterly business performance, exploring analysts' projections for specific key metrics can offer valuable insights.

Bearing this in mind, let's now explore the average estimates of specific Boston Scientific metrics that are commonly monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts.

Analysts predict that the 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Worldwide' will reach $1.80 billion. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +11.5%.

The consensus estimate for 'Net Sales- Cardiovascular- Worldwide' stands at $3.46 billion. The estimate points to a change of +17.5% from the year-ago quarter.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Urology- Worldwide' should arrive at $725.74 million. The estimate points to a change of +15.2% from the year-ago quarter.

Analysts forecast 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Endoscopy- Worldwide' to reach $756.05 million. The estimate points to a change of +9.6% from the year-ago quarter.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Geographic Revenue- Rest of the World' reaching $1.88 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +12.4% from the prior-year quarter.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Geographic Revenue- U.S.' will likely reach $3.39 billion. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +17%.

Analysts expect 'Net Sales- Cardiovascular- Peripheral Interventions- International' to come in at $297.57 million. The estimate suggests a change of +11% year over year.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Neuromodulation- United States' will reach $247.55 million. The estimate suggests a change of +7.2% year over year.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Neuromodulation- International' of $75.13 million. The estimate suggests a change of +10.5% year over year.

It is projected by analysts that the 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Endoscopy- United States' will reach $462.66 million. The estimate points to a change of +9.4% from the year-ago quarter.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Endoscopy- International' at $293.49 million. The estimate indicates a change of +9.9% from the prior-year quarter.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Net Sales- MedSurg- Urology- United States' should come in at $545.86 million. The estimate points to a change of +18.9% from the year-ago quarter.

View all Key Company Metrics for Boston Scientific here>>>

Over the past month, shares of Boston Scientific have returned -3.2% versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.9% change. Currently, BSX carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), suggesting that it may outperform. the overall market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Protalix Biotherapeutics Inc (NYSE-A:PLX, FRA:PBDA) said on Friday that the European Medicines Agency’s human medicines committee has issued a positive opinion recommending approval of an expanded dosing regimen for Elfabrio, its treatment for Fabry disease, in adult patients.

The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended approval of a 2 mg/kg every-four-weeks dosing schedule for Elfabrio in adult Fabry patients who are stable on enzyme replacement therapy, following a re-examination of the application.

Elfabrio, also known as pegunigalsidase alfa, is commercialized in partnership with Chiesi Global Rare Diseases, a unit of Italy’s Chiesi Group, which focuses on therapies for rare conditions.

Protalix said the CHMP opinion was based on results from the BRIGHT open-label switch-over study, which evaluated the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the every-four-weeks regimen over 52 weeks, as well as data from an ongoing open-label extension study with a median patient exposure of nearly six years. Additional support came from updated population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analyses using data from multiple clinical studies.

“The CHMP’s positive opinion is another testament to Protalix’s commitment to advancing treatments for people living with Fabry disease,” Protalix CEO Dror Bashan said, adding that the decision validates the company’s development pipeline and its proprietary ProCellEx manufacturing platform.

Chiesi Global Rare Diseases executive vice president Giacomo Chiesi said the less frequent dosing regimen could help reduce treatment burden for patients by extending the time between infusions.

Approval of the new dosing schedule by the European Commission would trigger a $25 million regulatory milestone payment to Protalix from Chiesi, the company said.

Fabry disease is a rare, inherited metabolic disorder caused by a deficiency of the enzyme alpha-galactosidase A, leading to progressive damage to organs including the heart and kidneys.

Shares of Protalix gained 8.7% on the news Friday morning in New York.