Finex logo
Finex Intelligence

Market Signal Briefing

Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 2 premium feeds.

Last news saved at Mar 25, 23:36 5m ago Cron last ran Mar 25, 23:36 5m ago 2 sources live
Switch language
89,357 Stories ingested Auto-fetched market intel nonstop.
330 Distinct tickers Symbols referenced across the feed
stockne... Trending sources stocknewsapi • cryptonews
Hot tickers
BTC ETH XRP SOL USDC BNO
Surfacing from current coverage
Details Saved Published Title Source Tickers
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.® COMPLETES MERGER WITH SOUTHWEST BANCSHARES, INC. stocknewsapi
PB
, /PRNewswire/ -- Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® ("Prosperity") (NYSE: PB), the parent company of Prosperity Bank®, today announced the completion of the merger of Southwest Bancshares, Inc. ("Southwest") with and into Prosperity and the merger of Southwest's wholly owned subsidiary, Texas Partners Bank ("Texas Partners"), headquartered in San Antonio, Texas, with and into Prosperity Bank, all effective on February 1, 2026.

Under the terms of the merger agreement between Prosperity and Southwest, Prosperity issued 4,095,397 shares of Prosperity common stock to the former shareholders and award holders of Southwest.

Brent Given, Texas Partners Interim Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, will join Prosperity Bank as San Antonio Area Chairman, and Tom Moreno, Texas Partners Chief Operating Officer, will have a senior management position in Prosperity Bank's operations. Additional members of Texas Partners management will maintain leadership roles in the combined organization. In addition, Gene Dawson, Jr., Interim Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Southwest, has joined the Board of Directors of Prosperity Bank.

Texas Partners operates eleven (11) banking offices in Central Texas including its main office in San Antonio, and banking offices in the San Antonio area, Austin and the Hill Country. Texas Partners banking locations will continue to operate under the Texas Partners Bank name until the operational integration, which is scheduled for November 2026. At that time, Texas Partners customers may begin using any of Prosperity Bank's full service banking centers.

About Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. ®

As of December 31, 2025, Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® is a $38.463 billion Houston, Texas based regional financial holding company providing personal banking services and investments to consumers and businesses throughout Texas and Oklahoma. Founded in 1983, Prosperity believes in a community banking philosophy, taking care of customers, businesses and communities in the areas it serves by providing financial solutions to simplify everyday financial needs. In addition to offering traditional deposit and loan products, Prosperity offers digital banking solutions, credit and debit cards, mortgage services, retail brokerage services, trust and wealth management, and treasury management.

As of January 30, 2026, Prosperity operates 301 full-service banking locations: 62 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands; 36 in the South Texas area including Corpus Christi and Victoria; 61 in the Dallas/Fort Worth area; 22 in the East Texas area; 28 in the Central Texas area including Austin and San Antonio; 45 in the West Texas area including Lubbock, Midland-Odessa, Abilene, Amarillo and Wichita Falls; 15 in the Bryan/College Station area; 6 in the Central Oklahoma area; 8 in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area; and 18 in the Central, South Texas and San Antonio areas currently doing business as American Bank.

Cautionary Notes on Forward-Looking Statements 

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. From time to time, oral or written forward-looking statements may also be included in information released to the public. Such forward-looking statements are typically, but not exclusively, identified by the use in the statements of words or phrases such as "aim," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "guidance," "intend," "is anticipated," "is expected," "is intended," "objective," "plan," "projected," "projection," "will affect," "will be," "will continue," "will decrease," "will grow," "will impact," "will increase," "will incur," "will reduce," "will remain," "will result," "would be," variations of such words or phrases (including where the word "could," "may," or "would" is used rather than the word "will" in a phrase) and similar words and phrases indicating that the statement addresses some future result, occurrence, plan or objective. Forward-looking statements include all statements other than statements of historical fact, including forecasts or trends, and are based on current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about Prosperity Bancshares and its subsidiaries. These forward-looking statements may include information about Prosperity's possible or assumed future economic performance or future results of operations, including future revenues, income, expenses, provision for loan losses, provision for taxes, effective tax rate, earnings per share and cash flows and Prosperity's future capital expenditures and dividends, future financial condition and changes therein, including changes in Prosperity's loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses, changes in deposits, borrowings and the investment securities portfolio, future capital structure or changes therein, as well as the plans and objectives of management for Prosperity's future operations, future or proposed acquisitions, including the integration of American, the future or expected effect of acquisitions on Prosperity's operations, results of operations, financial condition, and future economic performance, statements about the anticipated benefits of each of the proposed transactions, and statements about the assumptions underlying any such statement. These forward‑looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are based on expectations and assumptions Prosperity currently believes to be valid. Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, many of which are outside of Prosperity's control, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to whether Prosperity can: successfully identify acquisition targets and integrate the businesses of acquired companies and banks, including American; continue to sustain its current internal growth rate or total growth rate; provide products and services that appeal to its customers; continue to have access to debt and equity capital markets; and achieve its sales objectives. Other risks include, but are not limited to: the possibility that credit quality could deteriorate; actions of competitors; changes in laws and regulations (including changes in governmental interpretations of regulations and changes in accounting standards); the possibility that the anticipated benefits of an acquisition transaction, including American, are not realized when expected or at all, including as a result of the impact of, or problems arising from, the integration of American or as a result of the strength of the economy and competitive factors generally; a deterioration or downgrade in the credit quality and credit agency ratings of the securities in Prosperity's securities portfolio; customer and consumer demand, including customer and consumer response to marketing; effectiveness of spending, investments or programs; fluctuations in the cost and availability of supply chain resources; economic conditions, including currency rate, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations; and weather. Prosperity disclaims any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments. These and various other factors are discussed in Prosperity's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and other reports and statements Prosperity has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Copies of the SEC filings for Prosperity may be downloaded from the Internet at no charge from http://www.prosperitybankusa.com.

SOURCE Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
SI-BONE To Report Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2025 Financial Results on February 23, 2026 stocknewsapi
SIBN
February 02, 2026 16:30 ET  | Source: SI-BONE, Inc.

SANTA CLARA, Calif., Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SI-BONE, Inc. (Nasdaq: SIBN), the global leader in developing procedural solutions to address clinical challenges associated with compromised bone, today announced it will report financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 31, 2025 after market close on Monday, February 23, 2026. Management will host a conference call beginning at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time / 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

Investors interested in listening to the conference call may do so by registering at this link: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/zfxy6yox. Live audio of the webcast will be available on the “Investors” section of the company’s website at: www.si-bone.com. The webcast will be archived and available for replay for at least 90 days after the event.

About SI-BONE, Inc.

SI-BONE (NASDAQ: SIBN) is the global leader in developing procedural solutions to address clinical challenges associated with compromised bone. SI-BONE's expertise in additive manufacturing has resulted in a technology platform with market-leading applications in SI joint fusion, adult spinal deformity and pelvic trauma. Since 2009, SI-BONE has supported physicians in performing a total of over 140,000 procedures. A unique body of clinical evidence supports the use of SI-BONE’s technologies, including four randomized controlled trials and over 200 peer reviewed publications.

For additional information on the company or the products, including risks and benefits, please visit www.si-bone.com.

SI-BONE® is a registered trademark of SI-BONE, Inc. ©2026 SI-BONE, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

[email protected]
650-271-7515
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
Palomar Holdings, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Results Release Date and Conference Call stocknewsapi
PLMR
February 02, 2026 16:30 ET  | Source: Palomar Holdings, Inc

LA JOLLA, Calif., Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Palomar Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLMR) (the “Company”) today announced that it will release its fourth quarter and full year 2025 results after the market close on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, and will host a conference call at 12:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) the following day, Thursday, February 12, 2026.

The conference call can be accessed live by dialing 1-877-423-9813 or for international callers, 1-201-689-8573, and requesting to be joined to the Palomar Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. A replay will be available starting at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on February 12, 2026, and can be accessed by dialing 1-844-512-2921, or for international callers, 1-412-317-6671. The passcode for the replay is 13758018. The replay will be available until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on February 19, 2026.

Interested investors and other parties may also listen to a simultaneous webcast of the conference call by logging onto the investor relations section of the Company's website at https://ir.palomarspecialty.com/. The online replay will remain available for a limited time beginning immediately following the call.

About Palomar Holdings, Inc.

Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the holding company of subsidiaries Palomar Specialty Insurance Company (“PSIC”), Palomar Specialty Reinsurance Company Bermuda Ltd. (“PSRE”), Palomar Insurance Agency, Inc. (“PIA”), Palomar Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (“PESIC”), Palomar Underwriters Exchange Organization, Inc. ("PUEO"), First Indemnity of America Insurance Co. ("FIA"),  Palomar Crop Insurance Services, Inc. ("PCIS"), and The Gray Casualty & Surety Company (“Gray Surety”). Palomar's consolidated results also include Laulima Exchange ("Laulima"), a variable interest entity for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Palomar is an innovative specialty insurer serving residential and commercial clients in five product categories: Earthquake, Inland Marine and Other Property, Casualty, Fronting, and Crop. Palomar’s insurance subsidiaries, PSIC, PSRE, PESIC, FIA and Gray Surety have a financial strength rating of “A” (Excellent) from A.M. Best.

To learn more, visit PLMR.com

Follow Palomar on LinkedIn: @PLMRInsurance

Contact
Media Inquiries
Lindsay Conner
1-551-206-6217
[email protected]

Investor Relations
Jamie Lillis
1-203-428-3223
[email protected]   
Source: Palomar Holdings, Inc.
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
First Horizon Wealth Management Welcomes Eric Teal as Chief Investment Officer stocknewsapi
FHN
, /PRNewswire/ -- First Horizon Bank (NYSE: FHN or "First Horizon") announced today that Eric Teal has joined First Horizon Wealth Management as Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer (CIO). As CIO, Teal will lead a team of talented investment professionals that set investment strategy, oversee a robust portfolio construction process and share practical market insights with First Horizon Wealth Management clients.

Eric Teal, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for First Horizon Teal joins First Horizon Wealth Management from Comerica, where he served as Chief Investment Officer and a key member of the wealth management senior leadership team. Prior to that, he was Managing Director and Investment Manager with U. S. Bank Private Wealth Management and served more than 10 years as Chief Investment Officer at First Citizens Bank.

"We are pleased to have Eric join our Wealth Management leadership team. He brings proven leadership, a disciplined approach to investing and a passion for client engagement," said Martin de Laureal, Head of Wealth Management and Private Banking for First Horizon. "As CIO, his experience will enhance our team's strategy so clients can plan with confidence and realize their long-term goals."

Teal holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics and International Studies from Rhodes College in Memphis, a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Memphis and completed the International Economics and Trade Study Program at the London School of Economics. He is currently Treasurer of the PBS North Carolina Foundation Board and prior Chairman of the PBS North Carolina Board of Trustees.

About First Horizon Wealth Management
With a client-centric mission, First Horizon Wealth Management offers expertise in Investment Management, Estate & Financial Planning, Trust, Family Office and Private Banking services for our clients. For more information about First Horizon Wealth Management, visit https://www.firsthorizon.com/Wealth-Management.

About First Horizon
First Horizon Corp. (NYSE: FHN), with $83.9 billion in assets as of December 31, 2025, is a leading regional financial services company, dedicated to helping our clients, communities and associates unlock their full potential with capital and counsel. Headquartered in Memphis, TN, the banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank operates in 12 states concentrated in the southern U.S. The Company and its subsidiaries offer commercial, private banking, consumer, small business, wealth and trust management, retail brokerage, capital markets, fixed income, and mortgage banking services. First Horizon has been recognized as one of the nation's best employers by Fortune and Forbes magazines and a Top 10 Most Reputable U.S. Bank. More information is available at www.FirstHorizon.com.

SOURCE First Horizon Bank
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
QUAINT OAK BANCORP, INC. ANNOUNCES FOURTH QUARTER AND YEAR END EARNINGS stocknewsapi
QNTO
Southampton, PA, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) (OTCQB: QNTO), the holding company for Quaint Oak Bank (the “Bank”), announced today net income for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 of $174,000, or $0.07 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $1.6 million, or $0.60 per basic and diluted share, for the same period in 2024. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $322,000, or $0.12 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $2.8 million, or $1.08 per basic and diluted share, for the same period in 2024.

Robert T. Strong, Chief Executive Officer stated, “Starting our Centennial Year is a proud moment for our entire organization as it reflects a long-standing culture of resilience and disciplined leadership. Our ability to navigate changing environments while investing in the future has earned the continued trust of shareholders and customers. Reaching 100 years is not about survival but sustained progress, driven by adapting to industry direction and the evolving needs of our customers.”

“2025 continued as a year of building out both technology platforms and personnel which largely accounted for the $2.2 million increase in non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025, over calendar year 2024. During 2025, the Bank invested significant resources and capital to lay the proper foundation on which we expect to grow net income and optimize the balance sheet.”

“As we enter 2026, we have now moved from investment to activation in our international correspondent banking business line, from which we expect to see results in 2026. We anticipate that the long-term investments we have made have positioned us for growth in this sector and will provide promising results.”

“Additionally, our SBA initiative showed considerable progress in 2025. Our status as an SBA Preferred Lender has empowered the Commercial Lending team to operate with greater efficiency, resulting in a substantial increase in production volume as we originated $36.2 million of SBA loans in 2025 compared to $18.5 million of originations in 2024. While the recent government shutdown temporarily affected our fourth-quarter performance in this business segment, we are pleased to report that operations have normalized and momentum is strong moving forward.”

“One more observation in our resilience pattern: Oakmont Commercial, the Bank’s specialty real estate lending subsidiary, has successfully pivoted to a new model of originate-and-sell. This approach is expected to control our growth and anticipated to produce an increase in fee income. It also provides the ability to scale volume moving forward, building capital rather than reducing capital ratios with asset growth.”

Mr. Strong concluded, “We believe we leave 2025 in a much better position as we enter our Centennial Year, having focused on progress in key sectors of our business lines. As always, our current and continued business strategy focuses on long-term profitability and maintaining healthy capital ratios, both of which reflect our strong commitment to shareholder value.”

Comparison of Quarter-Over-Quarter Operating Results

Net income amounted to $174,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 89.0%, compared to net income of $1.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in net income on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily the result of an increase in non-interest expense of $662,000, and a decrease in non-interest income of $2.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in the net provision for income taxes of $436,000, a net decrease in the (recovery of) provision for credit losses of $402,000, an increase in interest and dividend income of $393,000, and a decrease in interest expense of $382,000.

The $393,000, or 4.0%, increase in interest and dividend income for the quarter was primarily due to a 23 basis point increase in the average yield on loans receivable, net from 6.32% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 6.55% for the three months ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of increasing interest income $357,000, and an increase in the average balance of loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale, which increased $2.7 million from $608.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $611.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of increasing interest income $43,000. Also contributing to the increase in interest and dividend income was a 25 basis point increase in the average yield on due from banks – interest earning, which increased from 3.47% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 3.72% for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of increasing interest income $16,000. Partially offsetting the increase in interest and dividend income was a $5.3 million decrease in the average balance of due from banks – interest earning, which decreased from $31.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $26.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of decreasing interest income $46,000. The $5.3 million decrease in the average balance of due from banks – interest earning was due to a higher level of balances during 2024 due to proceeds from the sale of the Bank’s 51% ownership of Oakmont Capital Holdings, LLC on March 29, 2024.

The $382,000, or 6.5%, decrease in interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2025 over the comparable period in 2024 was driven by a $496,000, or 9.3%, decrease in interest expense on deposits, which was primarily attributable to a $103.3 million decrease in the average balance of money market deposits which decreased from $198.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $95.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest expense $1.1 million, and a 126 basis point decrease in the average rate of money market accounts from 4.08% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 2.82% for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest expense $300,000. The decrease in average balances of interest-bearing deposits was a result of a strategic exit of a correspondent banking relationship for business checking deposits, and reduction in money market deposits through a deposit placement agreement. These decreases in interest expense were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in the interest expense for certificates of deposit due to a $92.8 million increase in the average balance of certificates of deposit which increased from $252.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $345.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025. The $92.8 million increase in the average balance of certificates of deposits was primarily due to the Bank’s competitive rate offerings in our market area. The average interest rate spread increased from 1.88% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 2.40% for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and the net interest margin increased from 2.54% for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to 3.04% for the three months ended December 31, 2025.

The $402,000, or 127.2%, net decrease in the (recovery of) provision for credit losses for the three months ended December 31, 2025 over the three months ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to a decrease in charge-offs and a decrease in the commercial and industrial loan balances, during the three months ended December 31, 2025.

The $2.4 million, or 58.0%, decrease in non-interest income for the three months ended December 31, 2025 over the comparable period in 2024 was primarily attributable to the $1.5 million gain on the sale and leaseback of the Company’s office building at 1710 Union Boulevard in Allentown, Pennsylvania in October, 2024, a $1.0 million, or 59.3%, decrease in net gain on sale of mortgage and Oakmont Commercial loans, a $50,000, or 17.7%, decrease in mortgage banking, equipment lending and title abstract fees, and a $4,000 decrease in net loan servicing income. These decreases were partially offset by a $145,000, or 71.8%, increase in gain on sale of SBA loans, a $25,000, or 11.5%, increase in insurance commissions, a $19,000, or 63.3%, increase in other fees and service charges, and a $2,000, or 6.5%, increase in income from bank-owned life insurance. The decrease in net gain on sale of loans was primarily attributable to mortgage loans.

The $662,000, or 11.6%, increase in non-interest expense for the three months ended December 31, 2025 over the comparable period in 2024 was primarily due to a $482,000, or 108.7%, increase in professional fees, a $79,000, or 19.6%, increase in data processing expense, a $55,000, or 1.4%, increase in salaries and employee benefits expense, a $25,000, or 5.9%, increase in occupancy and equipment expense, a $23,000, or 19.2%, increase in FDIC deposit insurance assessment, and a $19,000, or 39.6%, increase in directors’ fees and expenses. These increases were partially offset by a $33,000, or 33.0%, decrease in advertising expense. The increase in professional fees during the fourth quarter was primarily due to international correspondent banking software and compliance related activities and expense.

The provision for income tax from continuing operations decreased $436,000, or 84.5%, from $516,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $80,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2025 due primarily to a decrease in pre-tax income.

Comparison of Year-Over-Year Operating Results

Net income amounted to $322,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025, a decrease of $2.5 million, or 88.5%, compared to net income of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in net income on a comparative year basis was primarily the result of a decrease in interest and dividend income of $2.8 million, an increase in non-interest expense of $2.2 million, a decrease in non-interest income of $997,000, and a decrease in net income from discontinued operations of $406,000, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $2.9 million, a decrease in the net provision for income taxes from continuing operations of $710,000, and a decrease in the provision for credit losses of $317,000.

The $2.8 million, or 6.5%, decrease in interest and dividend income for the year ended December 31, 2025 over the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily driven by a decrease in the average balance of loans receivable, net, including loans held for sale, which decreased $23.8 million from $621.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $597.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest income $1.5 million. Also contributing to the decrease in interest and dividend income was a $29.6 million decrease in the average balance of due from banks – interest earning, which decreased from $61.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of decreasing interest income $1.5 million, and a 108 basis point decrease in the average yield on due from banks - interest earning from 4.96% for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 3.88% for the year ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of decreasing interest income $348,000. Partially offsetting this decrease in interest and dividend income was a nine basis point increase in the average yield on loans receivable, net from 6.45% for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 6.54% for the year ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of increasing interest income $518,000. Similar to the quarter, the $29.6 million decrease in the average balance of due from banks – interest earning was due to a higher level of balances during 2024 due to proceeds from the sale of the Bank’s 51% ownership of Oakmont Capital Holdings, LLC on March 29, 2024.

The $2.9 million, or 11.3%, decrease in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 over the year ended December 31, 2024 was driven by a $4.2 million, or 18.0%, decrease in interest expense on deposits, which was primarily attributable to an $82.0 million decrease in the average balances of money market deposits which decreased from $211.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $129.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $3.6 million, and a 108 basis point decrease in average rate of money markets which decreased from 4.44% for the year ended December 31, 2024, to 3.36% for the year ended December 31, 2025. Also contributing to the decrease was a $49.7 million decrease in the average balances of business checking accounts which decreased from $93.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $43.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $2.2 million, and a 159 basis point decrease in the average yield on business checking accounts which decreased from 4.50% for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 2.91% for the year ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $691,000. The decrease in average balances of interest-bearing deposits was a result of a strategic exit of a correspondent banking relationship for business checking deposits and reduction in a money market deposits through a deposit placement agreement. These decreases in interest expense were partially offset by $3.5 million increase in the interest expense on certificates of deposit due to an $85.5 million increase in the average balance of certificates of deposit which increased from $230.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $316.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 and had the effect of increasing interest expense by $3.5 million. These decreases in interest expense were also partially offset by a $1.3 million, or 240.9% increase in the interest expense on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings due to a $25.1 million, or 171.0%, increase in the average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings which increased from $14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of increasing interest expense $941,000, and a 94 basis point increase on the rate on Federal Home Loan borrowings which increased from 3.74% for the year ended December 31, 2024, to 4.68% for the year ended December 31, 2025, and had the effect of increasing interest expense by $373,000. Similar to the quarter, the $85.5 million increase in the average balance of certificates of deposits was primarily due to the Bank’s competitive rate offerings in our market area. The average interest rate spread increased from 1.84% for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 2.27% for the year ended December 31, 2025 while the net interest margin increased from 2.59% for the year ended December 31, 2024 to 2.83% for the year ended December 31, 2025.

The $317,000, or 20.7%, decrease in the provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2025 over the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to a decrease in the commercial and industrial loan category, and a decrease in charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2025.

The $997,000, or 12.2%, decrease in non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2025 over the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily attributable to the $1.5 million gain on the sale and leaseback of the Company’s office building at 1710 Union Boulevard in Allentown, Pennsylvania in October, 2024, a $636,000, or 103.9%, decrease in other fees and service charges, a $20,000, or 100.0%, decrease in real estate sales commissions, net, and a $4,000, or 3.4%, decrease in loan servicing fee income. These decreases were partially offset by a $978,000, or 215.9%, increase in gain on sale of SBA loans, a $76,000, or 10.2%, increase in insurance commissions, a $38,000, or 4.2%, increase in mortgage banking, equipment lending and title abstract fees, and a $10,000, or 8.5%, increase in income from bank-owned life insurance.

The $2.2 million, or 10.4%, increase in non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 over the comparable period in 2024 was primarily due to a $720,000, or 93.6%, increase in professional fees, a $522,000, or 3.6%, increase in salaries and employee benefits expense, a $462,000, or 35.6%, increase in data processing expense, a $381,000, or 26.9%, increase in occupancy and equipment expense, a $128,000, or 7.4%, increase in other expense, and a $62,000, or 30.8%, increase in directors’ fees and expenses. These increases were partially offset by an $84,000, or 13.7%, decrease in FDIC deposit insurance assessment, and an $8,000, or 2.6%, decrease in advertising expense. The increase in salaries and employee benefits expense, professional fees, occupancy and equipment expense, data processing expense, and other expense was primarily due to international correspondent banking software and compliance related activities and expense.

The provision for income tax from continuing operations decreased $710,000, or 68.8%, from $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 to $322,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025 due primarily to a decrease in pre-tax income.

Comparison of Financial Condition

The Company’s total assets at December 31, 2025 were $675.9 million, a decrease of $9.3 million, or 1.4%, from $685.2 million at December 31, 2024. This decrease in total assets was primarily due to a $9.4 million, or 15.0%, decrease in cash and cash equivalents, a $3.3 million, or 5.2%, decrease in loans held for sale, a $1.9 million, or 86.9%, decrease in investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost, and a $784,000, or 47.1%, decrease in investment securities available for sale. Partially offsetting the decrease in total assets was a $6.0 million, or 1.1%, increase in loans receivable, net of allowance for credit losses. The largest increases within the loan portfolio occurred in one-to-four family owner occupied loans which increased $15.7 million, or 60.6%, commercial real estate loans, which increased $12.1 million, or 4.1%, and construction loans which increased $5.1 million, or 28.1%. Partially offsetting these increases were commercial business loans which decreased $18.6 million, or 16.2%, one-to-four family non-owner occupied loans which decreased $4.7 million, or 14.0%, multi-family residential loans which decreased $4.6 million, or 10.2%, and home equity loans which decreased $365,000, or 6.4%. Cash and cash equivalents decreased as excess liquidity was used to fund the repayment of FHLB borrowings.

Loans held for sale decreased $3.3 million, or 5.2%, from $64.3 million at December 31, 2024 to $61.0 million at December 31, 2025 as the Bank’s commercial real estate subsidiary, Oakmont Commercial, LLC, originated $52.0 million of commercial real estate loans during the year ended December 31, 2025 and sold $49.5 million of loans in the secondary market during this same period. The Bank’s mortgage banking subsidiary, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, originated $112.3 million of one-to-four family residential loans during the year ended December 31, 2025 and sold $113.9 million of loans in the secondary market. Additionally, the Bank originated $14.7 million of SBA loans for sale and sold $18.9 million of SBA loans in the secondary market in the same period.

Total deposits increased $44.0 million, or 8.0%, to $597.3 million at December 31, 2025 from $553.3 million at December 31, 2024. This increase in deposits was primarily attributable to an increase of $71.8 million, or 25.4%, in certificates of deposit, an increase of $40.9 million, or 68.4%, in non-interest bearing checking accounts, an increase of $22.9 million, or 47.9%, in interest bearing checking accounts, and a $207,000, or 42.1%, increase in savings accounts. These increases in deposits were partially offset by a decrease of $91.8 million, or 56.6%, in money market accounts due to the strategic exit of a deposit placement agreement.

Total Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings decreased $47.9 million, or 100.0%, to none at December 31, 2025 from $47.9 million at December 31, 2024 as the Bank paid down the $47.9 million of borrowings.

Senior debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, increased $9.6 million from none at December 31, 2024 as the Company entered into a Senior Unsecured Note Purchase Agreement with certain institutional accredited investors pursuant to which the Company issued an aggregate of $9.75 million in aggregate principal amount of Fixed Rate Unsecured Senior Notes due March 1, 2028 (the “Senior Debt Notes”) in a private placement. The Company issued to an accredited individual investor an additional $250,000 in principal amount of the Senior Debt Notes as of March 4, 2025 for a total of $10.0 million in aggregate principal amount. The Senior Debt Notes bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 11.00%, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning September 1, 2025. The maturity date of the Senior Debt Notes is March 1, 2028.

Subordinated debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, decreased $14.0 million, or 63.6%, to $8.0 million at December 31, 2025 from $22.0 million at December 31, 2024 as the Company used the net proceeds from the sale of the Senior Debt Notes to repay a portion of the outstanding $14.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.5% Fixed Rate Subordinated Notes upon their maturity on March 15, 2025. The remaining $8.0 million of subordinated debt matures on December 31, 2028.

Total stockholders’ equity from continuing operations decreased $288,000, or 0.6%, to $52.3 million at December 31, 2025 from $52.6 million at December 31, 2024. Contributing to the decrease were dividends paid of $894,000, and purchase of treasury stock of $44,000. The decrease in stockholders’ equity was partially offset by net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 of $322,000, amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans of $251,000, the reissuance of treasury stock under the Bank’s 401(k) Plan of $74,000, and other comprehensive income, net of $3,000.

Non-performing loans at December 31, 2025 totaled $7.3 million, or 1.36%, of total loans receivable, net of allowance for credit losses, consisting of $5.8 million of loans on non-accrual status and $1.5 million of accruing loans 90-days or more delinquent. Non-accrual loans consist of two one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans, 14 commercial real estate loans, and 15 commercial business loans. Included in the 15 commercial business loans is one pool of equipment loans. Accruing loans 90-days or more past due include one one-to-four family residential owner occupied loan, one one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied loan, one commercial real estate loan, and one commercial business loan, all of which are still accruing. All non-performing loans are either well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. During the year ended December 31, 2025, one commercial real estate loan, and 11 commercial business loans totaling $1.6 million that were previously on non-accrual were charged-off through the allowance for credit losses. Non-performing loans at December 31, 2024 totaled $6.3 million, or 1.18%, of total loans receivable, net of allowance for credit losses, consisting of $5.6 million of loans on non-accrual status and $725,000 of accruing loans 90-days or more delinquent. Non-accrual loans consist of one one-to-four family residential owner occupied loan, four commercial real estate loans, and ten commercial business loans. Included in the ten commercial business loans is one pool of equipment loans. Loans 90-days or more past due include one one-to-four family residential owner occupied loan, two commercial real estate loans, and four commercial business loans, all of which are still accruing. All non-performing loans are either well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. During the year ended December 31, 2024, 19 commercial business loans totaling $1.6 million, and one construction loan of $187,000, that were previously on non-accrual were charged-off through the allowance for credit losses.

Other real estate owned (OREO) amounted to $360,000 at December 31, 2025 consisting of one property that was collateral for a non-performing commercial loan. Non-performing assets, consisting of non-performing loans and OREO, amounted to $7.6 million, or 1.14% of total assets at December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2024, there was no OREO.

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc., a Financial Services Company, is the parent company for the Quaint Oak Family of Companies. Quaint Oak Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered stock savings bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is headquartered in Southampton, Pennsylvania and conducts business through three regional offices located in the Delaware Valley, Lehigh Valley and Philadelphia markets. Quaint Oak Bank’s subsidiary companies include Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, and Oakmont Commercial, LLC, a specialty commercial real estate financing company. All companies are multi-state operations.

Statements contained in this news release which are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors. Factors which could result in material variations include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates which could affect net interest margins and net interest income, competitive factors which could affect net interest income and noninterest income, changes in demand for loans, deposits and other financial services in the Company's market area; changes in asset quality, general economic conditions as well as other factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were made.

In addition to factors previously disclosed in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those identified elsewhere in this press release, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements or historical performance: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts its operations; general economic conditions; legislative and regulatory changes; monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government; changes in tax policies, rates and regulations of federal, state and local tax authorities including the effects of the Tax Reform Act; changes in interest rates, deposit flows, the cost of funds, demand for loan products and the demand for financial services, competition, changes in the quality or composition of the Company’s loan, investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios; geographic concentration of the Company’s business; fluctuations in real estate values; the adequacy of loan loss reserves; the risk that goodwill and intangibles recorded in the Company’s financial statements will become impaired; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines and other economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affecting the Company’s operations, markets, products, services and fees.

QUAINT OAK BANCORP, INC.Consolidated Balance Sheets(In Thousands)   At December 31,  At December 31,    2025  2024   (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) Assets          Due from banks, non-interest-earning $1,978  $345   Due from banks, interest-earning  51,569   62,644           Cash and cash equivalents  53,547   62,989            Investment in interest-earning time deposits  912   912   Investment securities available for sale at fair value  882   1,666   Loans held for sale  60,956   64,281   Loans receivable, net of allowance for credit losses (2025: $6,166; 2024: $6,476)  540,698   534,693   Accrued interest receivable  3,789   3,961   Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost  291   2,214   Bank-owned life insurance  4,575   4,447   Premises and equipment, net  1,540   1,626   Goodwill  515   515   Other intangible, net of accumulated amortization  28   77   Other real estate owned, net  360   -   Prepaid expenses and other assets  7,760   7,787       Total Assets $675,853  $685,168          Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        Liabilities            Deposits           Non-interest bearing $100,697  $59,783    Interest-bearing  496,581   493,469      Total deposits  597,278   553,252     Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings  -   47,855     Senior debt, net of unamortized costs  9,619   -     Subordinated debt  8,000   22,000     Accrued interest payable  1,086   937     Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance  2,643   3,122     Accrued expenses and other liabilities  4,898   5,385    Total Liabilities  623,524   632,551 Total Stockholders’ Equity  52,329   52,617    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $675,853  $685,168  QUAINT OAK BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In Thousands, except share data)

  For the Three
Months Ended   For the Year
Ended   December 31,  December 31,   2025  2024  2025  2024   (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) Interest and Dividend Income                   Interest on loans, including fees $10,013  $9,613  $39,039  $40,058 Interest and dividends on time deposits, investment securities, interest-bearing deposits with others, and Federal Home
 Loan Bank stock  326   333   1,590   3,379 Total Interest and Dividend Income  10,339   9,946   40,629   43,437                  Interest Expense                  Interest on deposits  4,850   5,346   18,966   23,141   Interest on FHLB borrowings  190   42   1,858   545   Interest on FRB borrowings  -   -   1   -   Interest on senior debt  275   -   947   -   Interest on subordinated debt  164   473   954   1,934 Total Interest Expense  5,479   5,861   22,726   25,620 Net Interest Income  4,860   4,085   17,903   17,817   (Recovery of) Provision for Credit Losses – Loans  (27)  279   1,197   1,506   (Recovery of) Provision for Credit Losses – Unfunded Commitments  (59)  37   20   28 Total (Recovery of) Provision for Credit Losses  (86)  316   1,217   1,534 Net Interest Income after (Recovery of) Provision for Credit Losses  4,946   3,769   16,686   16,283                  Non-Interest Income                   Mortgage banking, equipment lending and title abstract fees  232   282   947   909   Real estate sales commissions, net  -   -   -   20   Insurance commissions  243   218   820   744   Other fees and services charges  49   30   (24)  612   Net loan servicing income  107   111   112   116   Income from bank-owned life insurance  33   31   128   118   Net gain on sale of loans  693   1,701   3,745   3,699   Gain on sale of SBA loans  347   202   1,431   453   Gain on sale-leaseback transaction  -   1,485   -   1,485 Total Non-Interest Income  1,704   4,060   7,159   8,156                  Non-Interest Expense                  Salaries and employee benefits  3,873   3,818   15,158   14,636   Directors' fees and expenses  67   48   263   201   Occupancy and equipment  447   422   1,799   1,418   Data processing  483   404   1,760   1,298   Professional fees  928   446   1,489   769   FDIC deposit insurance assessment  143   120   530   614   Advertising  67   100   294   302   Amortization of other intangible  12   12   48   48   Other  376   364   1,860   1,732 Total Non-Interest Expense  6,396   5,734   23,201   21,018   Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes  254   2,095   644   3,421   Income Taxes  80   516   322   1,032 Net Income from Continuing Operations  174   1,579   322   2,389   Income from Discontinued Operations  -   -   -   564   Income Taxes  -   -   -   158 Net Income from Discontinued Operations  -   -   -   406 Net Income  $174  $1,579  $322  $2,795    Three Months Ended
December 31,  Year Ended
December 31,   2025  2024  2025  2024 Per Common Share Data: (Unaudited)  (Unaudited)   Earnings per share from continuing operations – basic $0.07  $0.60  $0.12  $0.92   Earnings per share from discontinued operations – basic $-  $-  $-  $0.16   Earnings per share, net – basic $0.07  $0.60  $0.12  $1.08   Average shares outstanding – basic  2,636,914   2,631,851   2,632,661   2,578,804   Earnings per share from continuing operations – diluted $0.07  $0.60  $0.12  $0.92   Earnings per share from discontinued operations – diluted $-  $-  $-  $0.16   Earnings per share, net – diluted $0.07  $0.60  $0.12  $1.08   Average shares outstanding - diluted  2,636,914   2,631,851   2,632,661   2,578,804   Book value per share, end of period $19.84  $20.03  $19.84  $20.03   Shares outstanding, end of period  2,637,978   2,626,535   2,637,978   2,626,535    Three Months Ended
December 31,  Year Ended
December 31,   2025  2024  2025  2024 Selected Operating Ratios: (Unaudited)  (Unaudited)   Average yield on interest-earning assets  6.46%  6.19%  6.41%  6.32%  Average rate on interest-bearing liabilities  4.05%  4.30%  4.14%  4.48%  Average interest rate spread  2.40%  1.88%  2.27%  1.84%  Net interest margin  3.04%  2.54%  2.83%  2.59%  Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities  118.43%  118.00%  115.40%  120.08%  Efficiency ratio  97.45%  70.40%  92.58%  80.93%                 Asset Quality Ratios (1):                  Non-performing loans as a percent of total loans receivable, net  1.36%  1.18%  1.36%  1.18%  Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets  1.09%  0.92%  1.09%  0.92%  Allowance for credit losses as a percent of non-performing loans  84.01%  102.45%  84.01%  102.45%  Allowance for credit losses as a percent of total loans receivable, net  1.13%  1.20%  1.13%  1.20%  Texas Ratio (2)  11.45%  8.77%  11.45%  8.77% (1) Asset quality ratios are end of period ratios.
(2) Total non-performing assets divided by tangible common equity plus the allowance for credit losses.
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript stocknewsapi
NSSC
Q2: 2026-02-02 Earnings SummaryEPS of $0.37 beats by $0.06

 |

Revenue of

$48.17M

(12.20% Y/Y)

beats by $356.83K

Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) Q2 2026 Earnings Call February 2, 2026 11:00 AM EST

Company Participants

Francis Okoniewski - Vice President of Investor Relations
Richard Soloway - Founder, Chairman, CEO & Secretary
Kevin Buchel - COO, President & Director
Andrew Vuono - Senior VP of Finance, CFO & CAO

Conference Call Participants

Jeremy Hamblin - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division
James Ricchiuti - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division
Peter Costa - Mizuho Securities USA LLC, Research Division
Lance Vitanza - TD Cowen, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to NAPCO Security Technologies Fiscal Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Also note that this call is being recorded on Monday, February 2, 2026. And I would like to turn the conference over to Francis Okoniewski, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Francis Okoniewski
Vice President of Investor Relations

Thank you, Sylvie, and good morning, everyone. This is Fran Okoniewski, Vice President of Investor Relations for NAPCO Security Technologies. Thank you all for joining today's conference call to discuss financial results for our fiscal second quarter 2026. By now, all of you should have had the opportunity to review our earnings press release discussing our quarterly results. If not, a copy of the release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.napcosecurity.com. On the call today are Dick Soloway, Chairman and CEO of NAPCO Security Technologies; and Kevin Buchel, President and Chief Operating Officer; as well as Andrew Vuono, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, let me take a moment to read the forward-looking statement as this presentation contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections of future performance based on management's judgment, beliefs, current trends and anticipated product performance.

These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:30 1mo ago
Robinhood Shares Slide Nearly 10% Amid Broader Bitcoin And Cryptocurrency Slump stocknewsapi
HOOD
ToplineShares of stock trading platform Robinhood fell nearly 10% on Monday, tumbling amid a larger cryptocurrency sell-off that has sent digital assets like bitcoin and ethereum reeling in recent weeks.

Robinhood traded down nearly 9% on Monday. (Photo illustration by Cheng Xin/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Key FactsRobinhood shares closed down 9.6%, continuing a string of losses over the last five days of trading that have seen the stock drop nearly 16%.

Robinhood’s stock performance is strongly linked to the crypto market, often swinging on how well or how poorly large crypto players are trading.

Bitcoin managed a small increase Monday to $77,966, though the cryptocurrency juggernaut is down 10.4% since the start of the year and recently fell below $80,000 for the first time since April 2025.

Ethereum traded up a fraction of a percent but is down 22.5% in the last week of trading, to around $2,325.

Binance Coin traded up to $769.13 on Monday, leveling out after a 14.5% plunge in the last week of trading.

Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We’re launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day’s headlines. Text “Alerts” to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here.

TangentGold and silver prices slipped Friday following President Donald Trump’s announcement of Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair, falling after reaching all-time highs just days before. However, plummeting prices of the metals do not have some high-profile analysts worried, as they have suggested the cool-off was due to normal volatility and new record highs for gold could still be set this year.

What To Watch ForRobinhood will report its fourth quarter and full-year earnings on Feb. 10, with consensus revenue estimated at $1.34 billion. The company reported $1.27 billion in revenue during its third quarter.

Key BackgroundRobinhood’s poor start to the year comes after a massive 2025 in which shares surged over 200%. The trading platform reported doubled revenue in its third quarter, as well as a 271% increase in net income year-over year. The crypto slump in 2026 impacting Robinhood’s stock performance has been fueled by high inflation and the Fed’s policy, with the Federal Reserve voting last week to pause interest rate cuts. Rates could be lowered this year after Warsh comes into power, with analysts predicting cuts could come as early as June.

Further ReadingFed Holds Interest Rates Steady As Trump Pressures Central Bank (Forbes)

Gold And Silver Price Plummets Don’t Worry Analysts—Here’s Why (Forbes)
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:31 1mo ago
New Jersey Resources Reports Fiscal 2026 First-Quarter Results; Increases Net Financial Earnings Guidance for Fiscal 2026 stocknewsapi
NJR
WALL, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--New Jersey Resources Corporation (NYSE: NJR) today reported financial and operating results for its fiscal 2026 first quarter ended December 31, 2025.

Financial Highlights:

Fiscal 2026 first-quarter consolidated net income of $122.5 million, or $1.22 per share, compared with $131.3 million, or $1.32 per share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2026 first-quarter consolidated net financial earnings (NFE), a non-GAAP financial measure, of $118.2 million, or $1.17 per share, compared with $128.9 million, or $1.29 per share, in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a gain on sale of Clean Energy Ventures' (CEV) residential solar portfolio assets that was recognized in the prior-year period, partially offset by higher year-over-year NFE from New Jersey Natural Gas (NJNG), Storage and Transportation (S&T), and Energy Services (ES). Fiscal 2026 Outlook

Increases fiscal 2026 net financial earnings per share (NFEPS) guidance to a range of $3.28 to $3.43, from $3.03 to $3.18, a $0.25 increase, as a result of the strong performance of Energy Services in January 2026 Maintains 7 to 9 percent long-term net financial earnings per share (NFEPS) growth target, starting from a fiscal 2025 base of $2.83 per share*
* 7% - 9% growth would imply a NFEPS range of $3.03 - $3.08 in fiscal 2026 Management Commentary

Steve Westhoven, President and CEO of New Jersey Resources, stated, “NJR is off to a strong start in fiscal 2026. Our performance in the beginning of our fiscal second quarter has exceeded our original projections, as Energy Services benefited from natural gas price volatility. As a result, we are raising our fiscal 2026 NFEPS guidance range by $0.25 to $3.28 to $3.43. This represents the sixth consecutive year in which NJR has raised its guidance as a result of the benefits of our diversified energy platform."

Mr. Westhoven continued, "We are focused on delivering reliable, affordable energy to our New Jersey Natural Gas customers, pursuing growth opportunities across our Storage and Transportation business, and expanding capacity at Clean Energy Ventures. As we look ahead, we remain committed to disciplined execution and creating long-term value for our shareowners.”

Fiscal 2026 NFEPS Guidance

NJR is raising its fiscal 2026 NFEPS guidance range by $0.25 to a range of $3.28 to $3.43, subject to the risks and uncertainties identified below under "Forward-Looking Statements." The following chart represents NJR’s current expected NFE contributions from its business segments for fiscal 2026:

  Segment

Expected fiscal 2026
net financial earnings
contribution

    New Jersey Natural Gas

62 to 67 percent

    Clean Energy Ventures

9 to 14 percent

    Storage and Transportation

7 to 12 percent

    Energy Services

12 to 17 percent

    Home Services and Other

1 to 2 percent

  In providing fiscal 2026 NFE guidance, management is aware that there could be differences between reported GAAP net income and NFE due to matters such as, but not limited to, the positions of our energy-related derivatives. Management is not able to reasonably estimate the aggregate impact or significance of these items on reported earnings and, therefore, is not able to provide a reconciliation to the corresponding GAAP equivalent for its operating earnings guidance without unreasonable efforts.

Financial Metrics

Three Months Ended

December 31,

($ in Thousands, except per share data)

2025

2024

Net income

$

122,490

$

131,319

Basic EPS

$

1.22

$

1.32

Net financial earnings*

$

118,173

$

128,894

Basic net financial earnings per share*

$

1.17

$

1.29

*A reconciliation of net income to NFE for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively is provided in the financial statements below.

Net Financial Earnings (Loss) by Business Segment

Three Months Ended

December 31,

(Thousands)

2025

2024

New Jersey Natural Gas

$

83,829

$

66,908

Clean Energy Ventures

9,590

48,130

Storage and Transportation

7,363

5,664

Energy Services

16,280

7,833

Home Services and Other

479

615

Subtotal

117,541

129,150

Eliminations

632

(256

)

Total

$

118,173

$

128,894

New Jersey Natural Gas (NJNG)

NJNG reported fiscal 2026 first-quarter NFE of $83.8 million, compared to NFE of $66.9 million during the same period in fiscal 2025. The improvement in NFE was primarily driven by NJNG's base rate case settlement fully impacting utility gross margin for the first-quarter of 2026 while only partially affecting it during the first-quarter of last year. This improvement was partially offset by higher depreciation expense.

Customers:

At December 31, 2025, NJNG serviced approximately 592,000 customers in New Jersey’s Monmouth, Ocean, Morris, Middlesex, Sussex and Burlington counties, compared to approximately 589,000 customers as of September 30, 2025. Basic Gas Supply Service (BGSS) Incentive Programs:

BGSS incentive programs contributed $5.6 million to utility gross margin during the first quarter of fiscal 2026, compared with $3.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. This increase was primarily driven by increased margins from off-system sales and capacity release due to market volatility as a result of colder weather. For more information on utility gross margin, please see "Non-GAAP Financial Information" below.

Energy-Efficiency Programs:

SAVEGREEN® invested $26.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026 in energy-efficiency upgrades for customers' homes and businesses. Investments in SAVEGREEN® are incremental to rate base and earn near-real time returns through a rider that is updated annually. Clean Energy Ventures (CEV)

CEV reported fiscal 2026 first-quarter NFE of $9.6 million, compared with $48.1 million during the same period in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a one-time gain on sale of CEV's residential solar portfolio assets in November 2024.

Solar Investment Update:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, CEV placed two commercial projects into service, adding 9.7 megawatts (MW)* to installed capacity. As of December 31, 2025, CEV had approximately 489MW of commercial solar capacity in service across New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Indiana, and Michigan. * All MWs noted in DC

Storage and Transportation (S&T)

S&T reported fiscal 2026 first-quarter NFE of $7.4 million, compared with NFE of $5.7 million during the same period in fiscal 2025. NFE increased during the period mainly due to higher operating income at Adelphia Gateway (Adelphia) due to the impact of its recent Section 4 rate case settlement.

Adelphia: On November 4, 2025, Adelphia completed its Section 4 rate case process with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), receiving an order approving settlement.  Leaf River Energy Center (Leaf River): On October 31, 2025 Leaf River submitted an application to FERC to increase its natural gas storage capacity by 17.6 BCF through expansion of existing caverns and the development of an additional fourth cavern. Energy Services (ES)

ES reported fiscal 2026 first-quarter NFE of $16.3 million, compared with NFE of $7.8 million for the same period in fiscal 2025. The increase in NFE was primarily due to higher natural gas price volatility during the period that allowed ES to capture additional financial margin.

Home Services and Other Operations

Home Services and Other Operations reported fiscal 2026 first-quarter NFE of $0.5 million, compared with NFE of $0.6 million for the same period in fiscal 2025..

Capital Expenditures and Cash Flows:

During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, capital expenditures were $163.6 million, including accruals, compared with $149.6 million during the same period in fiscal 2025. The increase in capital expenditures was primarily due to higher expenditures at NJNG and CEV. NJR expects to deploy between $4.8 billion and $5.2 billion in capital expenditures through 2030, with utility spending at NJNG representing over 60% of the investment, all planned CEV capital expenditures safe-harbored to preserve tax credit eligibility, and strategic growth opportunities at S&T supporting long-term value creation. During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, cash flows from operations increased to $26.7 million, compared to cash flows used in operations of $9.0 million in the same period in fiscal 2025, due primarily to an increase in base rates at NJNG. Conference Call to be Webcast on February 3, 2026

New Jersey Resources will host a live webcast of its fiscal 2026 first quarter financial results on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 10 a.m. ET. A few minutes prior to the webcast, visit www.njresources.com and select “Investor Relations.” Scroll down and click the webcast link under “Latest Events” on the right side of the page.

Forward-Looking Statements:

This earnings release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. NJR cautions readers that the assumptions forming the basis for forward-looking statements include many factors that are beyond NJR’s ability to control or estimate precisely, such as expectations regarding future market conditions and the behavior of other market participants. Words such as “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “should” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements and such forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current expectations, assumptions and beliefs as of this date concerning future developments and their potential effect upon NJR. There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with management’s expectations, assumptions and beliefs or that the effect of future developments on NJR will be those anticipated by management. Forward-looking statements in this earnings release include, but are not limited to, statements regarding NJR’s NFEPS guidance for fiscal 2026, projected NFEPS growth rates and our guidance range, forecasted contributions of business segments to NJR’s NFE for fiscal 2026, our capital plan through 2030, including our capital expenditure projections through 2030, infrastructure programs and investments, future decarbonization opportunities including IIP, Energy Efficiency programs; and other legal and regulatory expectations, and statements that include other projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact.

Additional information and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from NJR’s expectations are contained in NJR’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including NJR’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other SEC filings, which are available at the SEC’s website, http://www.sec.gov. Information included in this earnings release is representative as of today only and while NJR periodically reassesses material trends and uncertainties affecting NJR's results of operations and financial condition in connection with its preparation of management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition contained in its Quarterly and Annual Reports filed with the SEC, NJR does not, by including this statement, assume any obligation to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement referenced herein in light of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Non-GAAP Financial Information:

This earnings release includes the non-GAAP financial measures NFE/net financial loss, NFE per basic share, financial margin and utility gross margin. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and reported in accordance with GAAP can be found below. As an indicator of NJR’s operating performance, these measures should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or operating revenues as determined in accordance with GAAP. This information has been provided pursuant to the requirements of SEC Regulation G.

NFE and financial margin exclude unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments related to NJR’s unregulated subsidiaries and certain realized gains and losses on derivative instruments related to natural gas that has been placed into storage at Energy Services, net of applicable tax adjustments as described below. Financial margin also differs from gross margin as defined on a GAAP basis as it excludes certain operations and maintenance expense and depreciation and amortization expenses as well as the effects of derivatives as discussed above. Volatility associated with the change in value of these financial instruments and physical commodity reported on the income statement in the current period. In order to manage its business, NJR views its results without the impacts of the unrealized gains and losses, and certain realized gains and losses, caused by changes in value of these financial instruments and physical commodity contracts prior to the completion of the planned transaction because it shows changes in value currently instead of when the planned transaction ultimately is settled. An annual estimated effective tax rate is calculated for NFE purposes and any necessary quarterly tax adjustment is applied to NJR Energy Services Company.

NJNG’s utility gross margin is defined as operating revenues less natural gas purchases, sales tax, and regulatory rider expenses. This measure differs from gross margin as presented on a GAAP basis as it excludes certain operations and maintenance expense and depreciation and amortization. Utility gross margin may also not be comparable to the definition of gross margin used by others in the natural gas distribution business and other industries. Management believes that utility gross margin provides a meaningful basis for evaluating utility operations since natural gas costs, sales tax and regulatory rider expenses are included in operating revenues and passed through to customers and, therefore, have no effect on utility gross margin.

Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures as supplemental measures to other GAAP results to provide a more complete understanding of NJR’s performance. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures are more reflective of NJR’s business model, provide transparency to investors and enable period-to-period comparability of financial performance. A reconciliation of all non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and reported in accordance with GAAP can be found below. For a full discussion of NJR’s non-GAAP financial measures, please see NJR’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 7.

About New Jersey Resources

New Jersey Resources (NYSE: NJR) is a Fortune 1000 company that, through its subsidiaries, provides safe and reliable natural gas and clean energy services, including transportation, distribution, asset management and home services. NJR is composed of five primary businesses:

New Jersey Natural Gas, NJR’s principal subsidiary, operates and maintains natural gas transportation and distribution infrastructure to serve customers in New Jersey’s Monmouth, Ocean, Morris, Middlesex, Sussex and Burlington counties. Clean Energy Ventures invests in, owns and operates solar projects, providing customers with low-carbon solutions. Energy Services manages a diversified portfolio of natural gas transportation and storage assets and provides physical natural gas services and customized energy solutions to its customers across North America. Storage and Transportation serves customers from local distributors and producers to electric generators and wholesale marketers through its ownership of Leaf River and the Adelphia Gateway pipeline, as well as our 50% equity ownership in the Steckman Ridge natural gas storage facility. Home Services provides service contracts as well as heating, central air conditioning, water heaters, standby generators and other indoor and outdoor comfort products to residential homes throughout New Jersey. NJR and its over 1,300 employees are committed to helping customers save energy and money by promoting conservation and encouraging efficiency through Conserve to Preserve® and initiatives such as SAVEGREEN®.

For more information about NJR:
www.njresources.com.

Follow us on X.com (Twitter) @NJNaturalGas.
“Like” us on facebook.com/NewJerseyNaturalGas.

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

December 31,

(Thousands, except per share data)

2025

2024

OPERATING REVENUES

Utility

$

409,901

$

333,427

Nonutility

194,953

154,934

Total operating revenues

604,854

488,361

OPERATING EXPENSES

Gas purchases

Utility

169,104

127,680

Nonutility

85,854

67,808

Related parties

1,277

1,718

Operation and maintenance

86,681

88,632

Regulatory rider expenses

33,154

22,476

Depreciation and amortization

49,576

45,329

Gain on sale of assets



(54,859

)

Total operating expenses

425,646

298,784

OPERATING INCOME

179,208

189,577

Other income, net

11,360

11,617

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

35,676

33,891

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES

154,892

167,303

Income tax provision

34,225

37,384

Equity in earnings of affiliates

1,823

1,400

NET INCOME

$

122,490

$

131,319

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic

$

1.22

$

1.32

Diluted

$

1.21

$

1.31

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

Basic

100,701

99,855

Diluted

101,229

100,478

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

December 31,

(Thousands)

2025

2024

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES

A reconciliation of net income, the closest GAAP financial measure, to net financial earnings is as follows:

Net income

$

122,490

$

131,319

Add:

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments and related transactions

2,996

6,368

Tax effect

(712

)

(1,513

)

Effects of economic hedging related to natural gas inventory

(8,567

)

(9,527

)

Tax effect

2,036

2,264

NFE tax adjustment

(70

)

(17

)

Net financial earnings

$

118,173

$

128,894

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

Basic

100,701

99,855

Diluted

101,229

100,478

A reconciliation of basic earnings per share, the closest GAAP financial measure, to basic net financial earnings per share is as follows:

Basic earnings per share

$

1.22

$

1.32

Add:

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments and related transactions

$

0.03

$

0.06

Tax effect

$

(0.01

)

$

(0.01

)

Effects of economic hedging related to natural gas inventory

$

(0.09

)

$

(0.10

)

Tax effect

$

0.02

$

0.02

Basic net financial earnings per share

$

1.17

$

1.29

NFE is a measure of earnings based on the elimination of timing differences to effectively match the earnings effects of the economic hedges with the physical sale of natural gas, SRECs and foreign currency contracts. Consequently, to reconcile net income and NFE, current-period unrealized gains and losses on the derivatives are excluded from NFE as a reconciling item. Realized derivative gains and losses are also included in current-period net income. However, NFE includes only realized gains and losses related to natural gas sold out of inventory, effectively matching the full earnings effects of the derivatives with realized margins on physical natural gas flows. NFE also excludes certain transactions associated with equity method investments, including impairment charges, which are non-cash charges, and return of capital in excess of the carrying value of our investment. These are not indicative of the Company's performance for its ongoing operations. Included in the tax effects are current and deferred income tax expense corresponding with the components of NFE.

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES (continued)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

December 31,

(Thousands)

2025

2024

NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION

A reconciliation of gross margin, the closest GAAP financial measure, to utility gross margin is as follows:

Operating revenues

$

410,138

$

333,765

Less:

Natural gas purchases

170,724

130,005

Operating and maintenance (1)

25,336

26,009

Regulatory rider expense

33,154

22,476

Depreciation and amortization

36,960

32,084

Gross margin

143,964

123,191

Add:

Operating and maintenance (1)

25,336

26,009

Depreciation and amortization

36,960

32,084

Utility gross margin

$

206,260

$

181,284

(1) Excludes selling, general and administrative expenses of $23.7 million and $26.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

ENERGY SERVICES

A reconciliation of gross margin, the closest GAAP financial measure, to Energy Services' financial margin is as follows:

Operating revenues

$

119,107

$

86,308

Less:

Natural Gas purchases

85,774

67,868

Operation and maintenance (1)

2,916

1,597

Depreciation and amortization

41

47

Gross margin

30,376

16,796

Add:

Operation and maintenance (1)

2,916

1,597

Depreciation and amortization

41

47

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments and related transactions

2,996

6,368

Effects of economic hedging related to natural gas inventory

(8,567

)

(9,527

)

Financial margin

$

27,762

$

15,281

(1) Excludes selling, general and administrative expenses of $0.3 million for both the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

A reconciliation of net income, the closest GAAP financial measure, to net financial earnings is as follows:

Net income

$

20,597

$

10,258

Add:

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments and related transactions

2,996

6,368

Tax effect

(712

)

(1,513

)

Effects of economic hedging related to natural gas

(8,567

)

(9,527

)

Tax effect

2,036

2,264

NFE tax adjustment

(70

)

(17

)

Net financial earnings

$

16,280

$

7,833

FINANCIAL STATISTICS BY BUSINESS UNIT

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

December 31,

(Thousands, except per share data)

2025

2024

NEW JERSEY RESOURCES

Operating Revenues

Natural Gas Distribution

$

410,138

$

333,765

Clean Energy Ventures

31,760

26,406

Energy Services

119,107

86,308

Storage and Transportation

28,080

26,628

Home Services and Other

16,005

15,794

Sub-total

605,090

488,901

Eliminations

(236

)

(540

)

Total

$

604,854

$

488,361

Operating Income

Natural Gas Distribution

$

120,312

$

97,106

Clean Energy Ventures

15,388

64,274

Energy Services

30,107

16,528

Storage and Transportation

11,975

9,769

Home Services and Other

787

995

Sub-total

178,569

188,672

Eliminations

639

905

Total

$

179,208

$

189,577

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

Storage and Transportation

$

1,240

$

961

Eliminations

583

439

Total

$

1,823

$

1,400

Net Income

Natural Gas Distribution

$

83,829

$

66,908

Clean Energy Ventures

9,590

48,130

Energy Services

20,597

10,258

Storage and Transportation

7,363

5,664

Home Services and Other

479

615

Sub-total

121,858

131,575

Eliminations

632

(256

)

Total

$

122,490

$

131,319

Net Financial Earnings

Natural Gas Distribution

$

83,829

$

66,908

Clean Energy Ventures

9,590

48,130

Energy Services

16,280

7,833

Storage and Transportation

7,363

5,664

Home Services and Other

479

615

Sub-total

117,541

129,150

Eliminations

632

(256

)

Total

$

118,173

$

128,894

Throughput (Bcf)

NJNG, Core Customers

31.7

27.2

NJNG, Off System/Capacity Management

24.7

14.4

Energy Services Fuel Mgmt. and Wholesale Sales

28.4

28.3

Total

84.8

69.9

Common Stock Data

Yield at December 31,

4.2

%

3.9

%

Market Price at December 31,

$

46.12

$

46.65

Shares Out. at December 31,

100,750

100,191

Market Cap. at December 31,

$

4,646,595

$

4,673,918

Three Months Ended

(Unaudited)

December 31,

(Thousands, except customer and weather data)

2025

2024

NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION

Utility Gross Margin

Operating revenues

$

410,138

$

333,765

Less:

Natural gas purchases

170,724

130,005

Operating and maintenance (1)

25,336

26,009

Regulatory rider expense

33,154

22,476

Depreciation and amortization

36,960

32,084

Gross margin

143,964

123,191

Add:

Operating and maintenance (1)

25,336

26,009

Depreciation and amortization

36,960

32,084

Total Utility Gross Margin

$

206,260

$

181,284

(1) Excludes selling, general and administrative expenses of $23.7 million and $26.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Utility Gross Margin, Operating Income and Net Income

Residential

$

145,098

$

130,018

Commercial, Industrial & Other

27,192

23,869

Firm Transportation

27,365

23,176

Total Firm Margin

199,655

177,063

Interruptible

1,018

974

Total System Margin

200,673

178,037

Basic Gas Supply Service Incentive

5,587

3,247

Total Utility Gross Margin

206,260

181,284

Operation and maintenance expense

48,988

52,094

Depreciation and amortization

36,960

32,084

Operating Income

$

120,312

$

97,106

Net Income

$

83,829

$

66,908

Net Financial Earnings

$

83,829

$

66,908

Throughput (Bcf)

Residential

16.5

14.1

Commercial, Industrial & Other

3.0

2.6

Firm Transportation

3.9

3.4

Total Firm Throughput

23.4

20.1

Interruptible

8.3

7.1

Total System Throughput

31.7

27.2

Off System/Capacity Management

24.7

14.4

Total Throughput

56.4

41.6

Customers

Residential

537,850

530,760

Commercial, Industrial & Other

33,279

33,149

Firm Transportation

21,268

22,068

Total Firm Customers

592,397

585,977

Interruptible

30

88

Total System Customers

592,427

586,065

Off System/Capacity Management*

28

27

Total Customers

592,455

586,092

*The number of customers represents those active during the last month of the period.

Degree Days

Actual

1,657

1,399

Normal

1,511

1,523

Percent of Normal

109.7

%

91.9

%

Three Months Ended

(Unaudited)

December 31,

(Thousands, except customer, RECs and megawatt data)

2025

2024

CLEAN ENERGY VENTURES

Operating Revenues

SREC sales

$

22,408

$

17,684

TREC sales

3,222

2,505

SREC II sales

515

391

Merchant Power

2,785

1,736

PPA / Other

2,830

2,219

Residential solar portfolio



1,871

Total Operating Revenues

$

31,760

$

26,406

Depreciation and Amortization

$

7,032

$

6,425

Operating Income

$

15,388

$

64,274

Income Tax Provision

$

2,738

$

14,141

Net Income

$

9,590

$

48,130

Net Financial Earnings

$

9,590

$

48,130

Solar Renewable Energy Certificates Generated

72,373

88,707

Solar Renewable Energy Certificates Sold

115,520

85,693

Transition Renewable Energy Certificates Generated

21,487

17,444

Solar Renewable Energy Certificates II Generated

5,409

4,404

ENERGY SERVICES

Operating Income

Operating revenues

$

119,107

$

86,308

Less:

Gas purchases

85,774

67,868

Operation and maintenance expense

3,185

1,865

Depreciation and amortization

41

47

Operating Income

$

30,107

$

16,528

Net Income

$

20,597

$

10,258

Financial Margin

$

27,762

$

15,281

Net Financial Earnings

$

16,280

$

7,833

Gas Sold and Managed (Bcf)

28.4

28.3

STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION

Operating Revenues

$

28,080

$

26,628

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

$

1,240

$

961

Operation and Maintenance Expense

$

10,466

$

10,083

Other Income, Net

$

1,987

$

2,392

Interest Expense

$

5,566

$

5,969

Income Tax Provision

$

2,273

$

1,489

Net Income

$

7,363

$

5,664

Net Financial Earnings

$

7,363

$

5,664

HOME SERVICES AND OTHER

Operating Revenues

$

16,005

$

15,794

Operating Income

$

787

$

995

Net Income

$

479

$

615

Net Financial Earnings

$

479

$

615

Total Service Contract Customers at December 31

97,793

99,604
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:31 1mo ago
Atlas Copco Primed For Recovery, But Expectations Aren't Exactly Low stocknewsapi
ATLKY
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-02-02 21:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 16:36 1mo ago
The Ensign Group Schedules Year End 2025 Earnings Call for Thursday, February 5, 2026 stocknewsapi
ENSG
February 02, 2026 16:36 ET  | Source: The Ensign Group, Inc.

SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, Calif., Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Ensign Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ENSG), the parent company of the Ensign™ group of companies, which invest in and provide skilled nursing and senior living services, physical, occupational and speech therapies, other rehabilitative and healthcare services, and real estate, announced today that it expects to issue its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 financial results on Wednesday, February 4, 2026.

Conference Call

Ensign invites current and prospective investors to tune into a live webcast to be held the following day, Thursday, February 5, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time (1:00 p.m. Eastern Time), during which Ensign's management will discuss Ensign's fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025 performance.

To listen to the webcast, or to view any financial or other statistical information required by SEC Regulation G, please visit the Investors section of the Ensign website at http://investor.ensigngroup.net. The webcast will be recorded and will be available for replay via the website until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Friday, February 27, 2026.

About Ensign™

The Ensign Group, Inc.'s independent operating subsidiaries provide a broad spectrum of skilled nursing and senior living services, physical, occupational and speech therapies and other rehabilitative and healthcare services at 373 healthcare facilities in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. More information about Ensign is available at http://www.ensigngroup.net.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

This press release contains statements regarding the Company’s expectation of issuing financial results and holdings its conference call and webcast which will include forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions and beliefs about its business, financial performance, operating results, the industry in which it operates and other future events. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," "would," "could," "potential," "continue," "ongoing," similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding growth prospects, future operating and financial performance, and acquisition activities. They are not guarantees of future results and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to materially and adversely differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statement.

These risks and uncertainties relate to the Company’s business, its industry and its common stock and include: reduced prices and reimbursement rates for its services; its ability to acquire, develop, manage or improve operations, its ability to manage its increasing borrowing costs as it incurs additional indebtedness to fund the acquisition and development of operations; its ability to access capital on a cost-effective basis to continue to successfully implement its growth strategy; its operating margins and profitability could suffer if it is unable to grow and manage effectively its increasing number of operations; competition from other companies in the acquisition, development and operation of facilities; its ability to defend claims and lawsuits, including professional liability claims alleging that our services resulted in personal injury, and other regulatory-related claims; and the application of existing or proposed government regulations, or the adoption of new laws and regulations, that could limit its business operations, require it to incur significant expenditures or limit its ability to relocate its operations if necessary. Additionally, our business and operations continue to be impacted by the unprecedented nature of the changes in the regulations and environment, as such, we are unable to predict the full extent and duration of the financial impact of these changes on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and are encouraged to review the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Form 10-Q and 10-K, for a more complete discussion of the risks and other factors that could affect Ensign’s business, prospects and any forward-looking statements. Except as required by the federal securities laws, Ensign does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changing circumstances or any other reason after the date of this press release.

Contact Information
Investor/Media Relations, The Ensign Group, Inc., (949) 487-9500, [email protected].

SOURCE: The Ensign Group, Inc.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:38 1mo ago
Venezuela Detains a Woman From Argentina, Accused of Escaping With $56M in BTC cryptonews
BTC
TL;DR

Venezuelan police arrested Rosa María González, a woman from Argentina who is a key suspect in the Generación Zoe crypto fraud. Leonardo Cositorto, leader of Generación Zoe, stated that González fled with 611 Bitcoin, equivalent to $56 million, and accused her of planning a new fraud from Venezuela. Diplomatic tensions between Argentina and Venezuela complicate González’s extradition process. Interpol authorities warned that her return will not be straightforward. Venezuelan police arrested Rosa María González, a key suspect in the Generación Zoe crypto scam, in San Cristóbal, Táchira state. The arrest occurred nearly four years after the scheme collapsed, leaving at least $120 million in losses for tens of thousands of investors in Argentina. González was apprehended while allegedly planning a new fraudulent project in Venezuela.

Leonardo Cositorto, leader of Generación Zoe, was sentenced to 12 years in prison in Argentina in 2025. Reports indicate that Cositorto stated González fled with 611 Bitcoin, worth $56 million after the collapse of the scam. During the scheme’s operation, the organizers offered returns of up to 7.5% on investments. The operation was presented as an automated trading system backed by a gold-linked crypto asset. Subsequent investigations determined that Generación Zoe functioned as a Ponzi scheme, paying older investors with funds from new participants.

González Planning a New Scam González reportedly introduced Cositorto to trading algorithms she had developed, claiming “quantum security” features and promised returns of up to 70% per month. The suspect evaded arrest in Buenos Aires by using private security firms and relocated to Venezuela, where she continued coordinating with other Generación Zoe associates. Reports indicate she sent funds to an individual so they could leave their job and dedicate themselves to the new project, which promised 5% monthly returns to investors contributing at least $1,000 in cryptocurrency.

González’s repatriation faces complications due to diplomatic tensions between Argentina and Venezuela. Relations between the two countries deteriorated in July 2024 following Venezuelan elections deemed “fraudulent” by the Argentine government. Interpol authorities indicated that the extradition will not be a simple process.

Generación Zoe: Argentina’s Largest Crypto Scam Generación Zoe used trading technology and promises of high returns to attract investments. After the scheme collapsed, the organizers faced multiple legal cases in Argentina. González’s arrest comes a year after Cositorto was jailed and shows that the fraudsters intended to continue operations.

This case represents one of Argentina’s largest crypto frauds, caused millions in losses for investors, and triggered a wave of active legal procedures to recover funds. The investigation into González will continue under coordination with local and international authorities
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:43 1mo ago
Hedera, Chainlink, and Avalanche Emerge as Core Hubs for RWA Development Activity cryptonews
AVAX HBAR LINK
TL;DR

30-day Santiment GitHub data shows RWA development is concentrating on a small group of networks while market conditions remain volatile. Hedera leads with 278.17 activity points, followed by Chainlink at 215.37, Avalanche at 135.13, and Stellar at 110.9, forming a clear top tier. Beyond the leaders, activity falls to IOTA, Chia Network, VeChain and others, reinforcing that real progress will be proven by deployed RWA products and measurable onchain adoption. Real world asset development is becoming increasingly concentrated, with a small group of networks separating from the rest of the sector. Santiment’s snapshot of GitHub activity over the past 30 days places Hedera, Chainlink, Avalanche, and Stellar well ahead of peers. This is a high signal read on where teams are spending engineering time while broader markets stay volatile. The concentration matters because it shows which ecosystems are being actively built rather than merely discussed. In RWAs, talk is cheap, but sustained repository work can hint at delivery pressure, partner expectations, and governance maturity.

🧑‍💻 Here are crypto's top Real World Assets (RWA's) by development. Directional indicators represent each project's ranking rise or fall since last month:

➡️ 1) @hedera $HBAR 🥇
➡️ 2) @chainlink $LINK 🥈
➡️ 3) @avax $AVAX 🥉
➡️ 4) @stellarorg $XLM
📈 5) @iota $IOTA
📉 6)… pic.twitter.com/uTHP9nktz8

— Santiment (@santimentfeed) February 2, 2026

What the ranking shows The ranking puts Hedera firmly in first place with 278.17 development activity points, signaling steady repository level output rather than short bursts. Chainlink follows in second at 215.37, reinforcing its role as core infrastructure for tokenized assets and dependable data feeds. Avalanche ranks third at 135.13, while Stellar is fourth at 110.9. The key implication is that the current RWA buildout has a clear top tier that is shipping consistently. Together these four projects account for most observable RWA focused development momentum in the period shown, by a wide margin, forming a top tier.

After that top tier, development activity drops sharply. IOTA ranks fifth with 79.1, followed by Chia Network at 46.73. VeChain posts 21.6, while Lumerin at 10.67, Creditcoin at 10.2, and Injective at 8.53 round out the top ten. That nuance matters because it ties leadership to sustained contributions, not static reputation. The rankings can shift as teams add or slow code, which is why the list should be read as a moving signal, not a permanent hierarchy today.

GitHub based development metrics do not predict short term price moves, but they can surface longer term commitment. For RWAs, where regulatory alignment, enterprise adoption, and technical reliability are critical, consistent development often precedes integration. This month’s data suggests infrastructure building is not evenly distributed, but concentrated among a few protocols attracting attention despite weaker sentiment. For now, the data points to focused buildout rather than broad expansion, with leadership remaining stable at the top. The professional takeaway is simple: confirm the rankings only when code turns into deployed products and measurable onchain adoption.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:45 1mo ago
Ripple Unlocks 1 Billion XRP Worth $1.63 Billion: Will Price Recover? cryptonews
XRP
Key NotesRipple executed its February 2026 escrow unlock releasing 1 billion XRP tokens from accounts established in 2022.The unlock represents 1.66% of XRP's circulating supply while 300 million tokens were allocated to treasury operations.XRP currently trades at $1.63 with an 18% monthly decline amid broader cryptocurrency market outflows totaling $1.7 billion. Ripple unlocked 1 billion XRP XRP $1.63 24h volatility: 1.5% Market cap: $99.32 B Vol. 24h: $5.61 B —worth approximately $1.63 billion—on February 2, as part of its funding strategy. 300 million XRP—worth half a billion dollars—are now reserved at its main treasury account, reserved for the company’s sales this month. Coinspeaker researched this information via publicly available, on-chain data retrieved from Ripple-owned accounts, labeled by XRPScan.

Notably, the funds come from previously locked XRP tokens via escrows created in 2022 that date back to XRP’s pre-mint and initial distribution. February 2026’s unlocks happened from the accounts labeled as Ripple (9) and Ripple (28), with four escrows reaching finality on Feb. 1.

Each account unlocked 500 million XRP in total, out of which came from escrows of 100 million and 400 million XRP tokens. These were then reallocated to three other accounts, following a pattern observed in previous months.

The Ripple (28) account sent 100 million XRP to Ripple (14) and 400 million XRP to Ripple (15), which have been re-locked in new escrows set to finish (and unlock) in December 2026. Meanwhile, the Ripple (9) account sent 200 million XRP to Ripple (14) for the same reason, plus 300 million tokens to Ripple (1), identified as the company’s liquid treasury account—used for funds distribution operations like OTC sales and exchange deposits.

Ripple on-chain data flow | Monthly Escrow Unlock February 2026 | Source: Coinspeaker / XRPScan

XRP Price Analysis As of this writing, XRP is trading at $1.63 per token, with accumulated losses of 18% in the past 30 days, following macro uncertainty and a trend also seen in most of the other cryptocurrencies. For example, crypto products recorded a net outflow of $1.7 billion in the last week alone, affecting the supply side of their underlying assets in open markets.

According to data from CoinMarketCap, XRP has a market capitalization of nearly $100 billion, positioned as the fifth-largest crypto by market cap. With a currently circulating supply of 60 billion XRP, the recent unlock represents 1.66% of that amount and the 300 million reserved for February operations represents 0.5% of that active supply.

XRP price (30D chart) as of Feb. 2, 2026 | Source: CoinMarketCap

On the other hand, Ripple, the company behind XRP’s issuance, unlocks, and ongoing developments, continues to push and advance in many areas, with a highlight to compliance-related movements. In the most recent development, Ripple has been granted a full Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license by Luxembourg’s CSSF, as Coinspeaker reported.

Disclaimer: Coinspeaker is committed to providing unbiased and transparent reporting. This article aims to deliver accurate and timely information but should not be taken as financial or investment advice. Since market conditions can change rapidly, we encourage you to verify information on your own and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content.

Cryptocurrency News, News, XRP News

Vini Barbosa has covered the crypto industry professionally since 2020, summing up to over 10,000 hours of research, writing, and editing related content for media outlets and key industry players. Vini is an active commentator and a heavy user of the technology, truly believing in its revolutionary potential. Topics of interest include blockchain, open-source software, decentralized finance, and real-world utility.

Vini Barbosa on X
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:46 1mo ago
Epstein files reveal Bitcoin's secret war as Ripple insiders expose a decade of explosive hidden industry sabotage cryptonews
BTC XRP
A decade-old email is reviving questions about whether projects like Ripple posed a threat to Bitcoin’s development or merely served as competitors that some BTC backers sought to exclude.

The email, dated July 31, 2014, appears to show Austin Hill, then described as Blockstream’s chief executive, telling the late Jeffrey Epstein and other recipients that “Ripple, and Jed McCaleb’s new Stellar [were] bad for the ecosystem.” Blockstream is a Bitcoin-focused blockchain technology firm.

The correspondence resurfaced after the US Department of Justice published millions of pages of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a disclosure that includes emails, files, images, and videos tied to past investigations.

What was in the email?The email’s headline draw is obvious (as Jeffrey Epstein is a toxic magnet for attention), and Blockstream’s current leadership has moved quickly to deny any ongoing financial connection.

However, the more durable story is about the sender’s premise rather than the recipients' notoriety.

Austin Hill argued that capital flowing into Ripple and Stellar wasn’t merely competition. It was contamination. He viewed these projects as threats that could “damage” Bitcoin’s future by diluting investor alignment, developer focus, and narrative power.

To many maximalists of that era, the “ecosystem” was not a broad crypto category. It was Bitcoin, plus the infrastructure, that made the flagship digital asset more usable without compromising its ethos.

Thus, this worldview “justified” the specific pressure applied in the email.

However, XRP community members view the email as evidence that early Bitcoin insiders sought to divert capital from Ripple.

For context, XRP commentator Leonidas Hadjiloizou argued the email reads like an attempt to pressure investors to “pick a horse” and to reduce or withdraw a Blockstream allocation if they also backed Ripple or Stellar.

According to him:

“The email to Epstein and Joichi Ito by Austin Hill was just another effort by Bitcoin maxis to fight Ripple and Stellar.”

Meanwhile, the resurfaced email has pulled in modern Ripple voices who lived through these early battles.

Ripple CTO emeritus David Schwartz said he “wouldn’t be at all surprised” if the email is “the tip of a giant iceberg,” arguing that:

“Hill felt that support for Ripple or Stellar made someone an enemy/opponent. It seems quite likely that Hill and others expressed similar views to many other people.”

In his view, standing against the supporters of rival networks as enemies hurts everyone in the space.

However, Schwartz also drew a boundary around what the email does not establish, noting there is no evidence of direct connections between Epstein and Ripple, XRP, or Stellar.

Is Ripple Really Bad for the Ecosystem?The irony of Hill’s 2014 warning is that the “damage” he feared has arguably materialized, as Ripple has become a dominant force in the industry. In 2026, Ripple has not only survived but also entrenched itself as a regulated pillar of the crypto infrastructure.

However, this growth occurred without the catastrophic consequences for Bitcoin that maximalists originally predicted.

In fact, Ripple’s evolution over the last decade suggests that the “ecosystem” was always destined to be larger than just Bitcoin.

The firm’s most significant milestone came with the conclusion of its long-running battle with the SEC. The 2025 settlement, which saw the company pay a fraction of the regulator’s original demand, effectively cleared the regulatory cloud that had hung over the asset for years.

That legal clarity paved the way for the very thing early Bitcoiners feared: deep institutional integration.

Today, the company looks less like a “scam” and more like a bank with major licenses worldwide.

Moreover, Ripple has aggressively expanded its custody capabilities by acquiring Swiss-based Metaco and Standard Custody & Trust. It has also acquired major financial platforms like GTreasury, Hidden Road, and the stablecoin platform Rail.

Perhaps the strongest rebuttal to the “bad for the ecosystem” claim is the market’s acceptance of XRP as an institutional asset class.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

The launch of XRP ETFs in late 2025, including offerings from issuers like Franklin Templeton, signaled that Wall Street no longer views the asset as “contamination.”

Instead, the inflows into these products suggest that for modern investors, the “ecosystem” is not a zero-sum game between Bitcoin and payments networks. It is a diversified portfolio where both “horses” can run.

Will Bitcoin and Ripple community members ever end their bickering?Long before spot crypto ETFs and big-bank custody deals, the Bitcoin community fought public battles in forums over what counted as “good for the ecosystem.”

On Bitcointalk, one widely circulated 2013 thread framed Ripple as contrary to Bitcoin’s goals and criticized its structure and incentives, reflecting a strain of skepticism that later hardened into the “maximalist” worldview.

Those criticisms tended to cluster around a few themes: governance control, token distribution, whether a project’s economic model was “too company-led,” and whether its outreach to banks and regulators undercut Bitcoin’s political narrative.

However, supporters of Ripple and Stellar argued that faster settlement rails, lower transaction costs, and a focus on payments were practical features rather than ideological betrayals.

They contended that early Bitcoin discourse often conflated “different design” with “existential threat.”

Meanwhile, even if the 2014 email is primarily a time capsule, it maps onto a more recent political and policy conflict that has shifted the Bitcoin-versus-Ripple debate from forums to lobbying.

In early 2025, Jack Mallers, the co-founder and CEO of Twenty One Capital, argued that Ripple was actively lobbying to prevent a Bitcoin-only Strategic Reserve in the US while promoting its centralized, corporate-controlled XRP token.

According to him, XRP’s centralized nature conflicts with the goals of a strategic BTC reserve that are “pro-industry, pro-jobs, and pro-technology.”

That debate became more concrete when President Donald Trump said a US strategic crypto reserve would include XRP alongside Bitcoin and other major tokens.

The announcement sharpened an already familiar fault line: Bitcoin maximalists advocating a single-asset monetary reserve versus a multi-asset framework that benefits large US-linked token networks.

These issues explain why the Bitcoin and Ripple communities appear to be in outright loggerheads over the past years, despite the assets being two of the most popular cryptocurrencies globally.

However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse appears to be steering the XRP holders away from the “fights” by consistently urging cooperation and unity among industry players to help the emerging sector grow.

Mentioned in this articlePosted in
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:51 1mo ago
XRP's Price Gears Up For a Double-Digit Move: Which Way? cryptonews
XRP
XRP’s price just bounced off a crucial central line, tagging the 33-EMA after last weekend’s wild liquidity sweep.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: February 2, 2026 │ 7:44 PM GMT

Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin

Is another liquidity grab coming? That’s the question that’s been bothering the majority of crypto enthusiasts. With market liquidations resembling the Corona years or the FTX downfall, traders rely on historical price trends to assess what’s coming next for the XRP Army.

Egrag‘Y’ Crypto, a popular French technical crypto chart analyst, explained the two most likely outcomes, based on XRP’s price recently hitting the 33 Exponential Moving Average (EMA) around $1.60 – $1.61. While at it, XRP’s liquidity sweep at $1.64 has boosted the OG altcoin’s rebound to $1.66 to kick off February.

Sponsored

In the first most-likely scenario, the popular crypto analyst expects a “relief bounce first”, but a second liquidity sweep is still coming. The seasoned market watcher has refrained from giving an exact XRP price range that’s projected for the second liquidity sweep. In this case, the sweep is followed by an expansion – high price fluctuations.

Judging from the fractal XRP structure, here the second scenario comes into play – this one is based solely on the historical price of Ripple coin (XRP), not taking into account social factors or the shifted regulatory landscape.

By this scenario, XRP either replicates the 2021 structure or the 2017 one. In the first case, XRP would test $7, nearly 2x from the current all-time peak.

XRP’s 2017 Bull Cycle Projects Huge Price TargetMeanwhile, the repetition of 2017 bull cycle hits even harder – if mimicked, XRP’s price would tack on a 1,600% upswing to tackle $27. While this forecast may look far-fetched, the legal progress in the Clarity Act makes it easier for Ripple Labs to put the pieces together in the quest to frontrun crypto adoption. 

#XRP – 33 EMA Breakdown ≠ Game Over (UPDATE):

🏳️On the monthly chart, #XRP just tagged the Central Line + 33 EMA around $1.60–$1.61 ( The Dip was to $1.50)

🏳️It held the close above $1.60, swept liquidity near $1.64, and opened February at $1.66.

🏳️Why this This matter???… https://t.co/P56R5P3xr0 pic.twitter.com/CvJstLiCwG

— EGRAG CRYPTO (@egragcrypto) February 1, 2026 Following the launch of Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin, Ripple’s original token XRP is bound to capture a piece of the newly-established liquidity as institutional investors pile in. Surpassing $1.2 billion in less than two weeks since inception, RLUSD could help XRP soften the second liquidity grab, a temporary phase where XRP won’t break beyond $2.40, says Egrag.

“Same structure. Same EMA behavior. Same central line reaction.”, – contemplated Egrag, the highly-experienced trader as XRP’s price continued to dance around the $1.64 liquidity pocket on Monday evening. With the general markets back below $3 trillion, the next few business days are likely to deliver a decisive XRP price signal for the near-term.

Delve into DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:
Japan’s “Avalanche Moment” To Lead The Next Big Liquidity Wave?
Historic Liquidations Rattle Market, But XRP ETFs See Fresh Inflow

People Also Ask:What does “double-digit move” mean here?

A 10%+ XRP price swing (up or down) in a short-term period—could be $1.90 to $2.10+ (bullish) or back to $1.70–$1.52 (bearish).

Why is XRP set up for a big swing now?

The current price action of Ripple coin (XRP) shows compression (falling wedge/tight range on daily/weekly charts), low volume building tension.

What is the bullish scenario?

Break above $2.00–$2.10 with volume could ignite 10–20%+ upside fast (targets $2.50–$3 short-term, $4+ longer if ETF inflows/RWA adoption ramp).

What’s the bearish scenario?

Failure at resistance + macro headwinds (Bitcoin pullback, geopolitical risks) could trigger 10–20% downside (re-test $1.50–$1.70 or lower).

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:52 1mo ago
Ethereum Price Forecast: RSI Flashes Major Multi-Year “Buy Signal” for ETH cryptonews
ETH
Scan QR code to install app

Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:54 1mo ago
Raoul Pal Says Bitcoin (BTC) Isn't Broken: US Liquidity Is the Real Culprit cryptonews
BTC
Raoul Pal said that Bitcoin's collapse reflects a temporary US liquidity drain, not a broken crypto cycle or failed market.

Bitcoin has plunged almost 40% from its peak of $126,000. While it currently trades a little above $77,000, prices remain fragile, and investors are positioning for a deeper drawdown.

Amidst intense bearish sentiment, Raoul Pal, founder and CEO of Global Macro Investor, said that widely circulating claims that BTC and the broader crypto market are “broken” represent a false narrative driven by temporary liquidity conditions rather than a failed cycle.

Bitcoin and SaaS Pal said the dominant market story indicates the crypto cycle is over, and prices are collapsing due to factors such as exchange issues, institutional actions, or structural flaws. But he described this view as an “alluring narrative trap” which has been reinforced by continued daily price declines. Analysis showed that the UBS SaaS Index and Bitcoin have followed nearly identical price patterns, which essentially indicates a common underlying factor rather than asset-specific problems.

According to Pal, that factor is US liquidity, which has been constrained as a result of several technical and fiscal factors. He pointed to the completion of the US Reverse Repo drain in 2024, followed by Treasury General Account (TGA) rebuilds in July and August that lacked an offsetting liquidity injection, which ended up resulting in a liquidity withdrawal.

Pal stated this liquidity shortage has also contributed to weak ISM readings. While Global Total Liquidity typically has the strongest long-term correlation with Bitcoin and US equities, he argued that US Total Liquidity is currently more influential because the US is the primary source of global liquidity. The GMI founder added that global liquidity has led US liquidity this cycle and is beginning to turn higher, which is expected to feed through to US liquidity and economic indicators.

Bitcoin and SaaS have been particularly affected because they are among the longest-duration assets and therefore most sensitive to liquidity conditions.  The rally in gold absorbed marginal liquidity that might otherwise have flowed into riskier assets such as Bitcoin and SaaS, leaving insufficient liquidity to support all asset classes at the same time, he said.

The current US government shutdown has intensified the liquidity drain, as the Treasury did not draw down the TGA after the previous shutdown and instead added to it. He called the resulting environment a temporary “air pocket,” which has caused severe price pressure.

You may also like: Bitcoin Drops Out of Top 10 Global Assets, Falls to 13th Bitcoin Touches 9-Month Low as Selling Hits Crypto, Metals, and Energy Bitcoin Rebounds Above $76K, but Analysts See Cycle Bottom Much Lower However, Pal said signs indicate the shutdown could be resolved soon, and characterized it as the final major liquidity obstacle. He reiterated that additional liquidity factors, such as adjustments to the enhanced supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR), partial TGA drawdowns, fiscal stimulus, and eventual rate cuts, remain ahead.

Hawkish Fed Fears Some market commentators have hinted that expectations of a more cautious pace of rate cuts under incoming Fed chair Kevin Warsh have also weighed on markets. But Pal rejected claims that Warsh represents a hawkish policy stance, and instead called the narrative incorrect and rooted in outdated comments. He believes Warsh’s approach aligns with policies favoring rate cuts and economic expansion, while maintaining balance sheet stability due to reserve constraints.

Despite the recent turmoil in the market, Pal said that he remains strongly bullish on 2026.

Tags:
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:57 1mo ago
Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, Dogecoin Trade Sideways After Weekend Crash cryptonews
BTC DOGE ETH XRP
Bitcoin is trading sideways after the U.S. ISM PMI climbed to its highest level since 2022, easing recession fears. Cryptocurrency Ticker Price Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) $78,262 Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) $2,328 Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) $104.36 XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) $1.63 Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE) $0.1083 Shiba Inu (CRYPTO: SHIB) $0.056923 Notable Statistics: Coinglass data shows 184,994 traders were liquidated in the past 24 hours for $765.88 million.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:00 1mo ago
Analyst Highlights What People Are Missing In The XRP Price Chart cryptonews
XRP
An XRP analyst is pushing back against the growing sense of boredom surrounding XRP’s price action, with the outlook that people are misreading what is actually happening on the higher timeframes. 

Taking to the social media platform X, an analyst known as XRP QUEEN said traders are overlooking a typical setup that has always preceded some of XRP’s most notable rallies. Her view is based on XRP’s weekly price structure and a comparison with how previous long consolidation phases eventually resolved.

Why XRP $1.50 To $3 Range Matters More Than It Looks A look at the weekly candlestick timeframe chart shows that XRP’s price action over multiple months has been largely confined between support at $1.5 and resistance just above $3. Interestingly, according to the analysis from XRP Queen, XRP’s price action being pinned between roughly $1.50 and $3 is not a sign of weakness but a repeat of earlier accumulation zones. 

The chart shows how the token has previously spent long stretches moving sideways for hundreds of days, highlighted on the chart as 200-day, 800-day, and even 1,000-day consolidation phases. In each case, price compression eventually gave way to a vertical move higher, labeled as MOON on the chart.

Source: Chart from XRP Queen on X The key point being made is that these flat, frustrating periods tend to drain interest and attention from the market. That drop in engagement, according to the analyst, has always aligned with smart accumulation. The longer the range holds, the more pressure builds beneath the surface.

$2.72 And The Projection Of A Teleport Move A notable level on the chart is the $2.72 zone, which is sitting around the 0.786 Fibonacci extension level projected from XRP price lows in 2018. Breaking and holding above $2.72 would be important to how XRP rallies to new all-time highs. As noted by XRP Queen, if $2.72 holds, then the next outlook is looking at $9-$15.

Once XRP leaves this range, it teleports. No pullbacks and no second chances. The projection on the chart shows Fibonacci extensions stretching far above the current price. These extensions include 0.786 at $2.71, the 1.0 extension around $3.40, followed by 1.618 at $5.47, 2.818 at $8.78, and the most extreme 4.764 extension around $15.89, all pointing to price targets to be broken once the current range is broken.

However, the altcoin is currently trading far below the $2.72 level needed to confirm the price teleportation to interesting highs. At the time of writing, XRP is trading around $1.60, meaning the price would need to climb by about 69% just to retest $2.72. Until that happens, XRP is in consolidation mode, and it is unclear how long it will keep trading sideways in the current range.

XRP trading at $1.60 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:00 1mo ago
Monero slips 12% in a day – Is $266 now in play for XMR? cryptonews
XMR
Journalist

Posted: February 3, 2026

The privacy-token narrative that once fueled rallies across assets like Monero and Zcash [ZEC] continued to weaken as investor focus shifted elsewhere.

Fragile broader market sentiment added pressure, accelerating losses across the privacy-focused segment.

Monero remained at the center of that decline.

Over the past 24 hours, XMR dropped by roughly 12%, leading to losses within the sector and reinforcing bearish momentum.

Market conditions suggested downside risks remained elevated. Price structure, Derivatives positioning, and sentiment aligned toward continued weakness before any recovery attempt.

Is a five-month low approaching? The daily chart pointed to a deeper structural breakdown with implications beyond a short-term pullback.

XMR previously respected a rising ascending support line that repeatedly acted as a launchpad for upside moves.

That structure eventually supported the rally toward the $800 peak. The trendline has now failed.

Source: TradingView

That breach marked a clear shift in trend dynamics. Price behavior resembled a sustained corrective phase rather than a temporary consolidation.

Based on prior reactions, Monero [XMR] could retrace toward the base of that structure near $266. Such a move would imply a decline of roughly 32% from recent levels.

Bearish pressure builds, but not without limits Liquidity signals continued to favor bears. Capital outflows remained visible, reinforcing expectations of ongoing price pressure.

The Money Flow Index (MFI) fell to around 26, a level typically linked to persistent capital exits. More importantly, the indicator continued trending lower, suggesting selling pressure had not stabilized.

Source: TradingView

Even so, volatility-based indicators introduced nuance. Bollinger Bands highlighted price zones where reactions often emerge.

XMR traded near the lower Bollinger Band, a level that historically acted as a short-term response area. A bounce here could allow price to recover toward the mid-band near $519, with an extended move toward $687.

Until confirmation emerged, sellers retained control and downside risks dominated near-term action.

Exchange data adds nuance to the sell-off Having said that, perpetual market data painted a more layered picture beneath spot weakness.

The Long/Short Ratio remained skewed toward long positions, while the OI-Weighted Funding Rate showed longs paying funding. That setup indicated traders continued positioning for upside despite declining prices.

Source: CoinGlass

More importantly, Open Interest dropped sharply to $141.15 million over the past day.

Only $1.87 million of that decline came from liquidations, pointing instead to panic-driven position closures.

That distinction mattered. It suggested that selling intensity may be fading, raising the probability of a temporary bottom forming near the lower Bollinger Band.

From there, XMR could attempt a short-term recovery and test the previously broken ascending support.

Final Thoughts XMR lost its long-held ascending support after a sharp sell-off, extending losses by roughly 12% in 24 hours. Monero’s Open Interest fell to $141.15M, but only $1.87M came from liquidations, suggesting panic exits rather than forced selling.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:00 1mo ago
Ethereum Treasury Firm BitMine Faces $7B Unrealized Loss Amid Crypto Downturn cryptonews
ETH
BitMine Immersion Technologies is facing unrealized losses of almost $7 billion on its Ethereum positions. The unrealized losses are a result of the current crypto market downturn and its effect on ETH prices. The current scenario emphasizes the risks of illiquidity and valuation associated with institutional Ether positions. BitMine Immersion Technologies, one of the largest publicly recognized holders of Ethereum (ETH), is currently struggling with unrealized losses of almost $7 billion due to the recent crypto market downturn, which has pushed its Ethereum treasury significantly into the red. The company’s Ether position, acquired at an average price of approximately $3,883 per Ether, is currently under pressure due to the significant decline in ETH prices, resulting in substantial paper losses on its balance sheet.

BitMine Immersion Technologies’ unrealized losses are among the largest in the industry, according to data on corporate Ether treasuries, exceeding initial estimates of around $6 billion due to the current market downturn.

Market Downturn Squeezes ETH Treasury Firms BitMine’s current state is indicative of approximately 4.24 million ETH tokens, which is a significant representation of the total circulating supply, with the Ethereum market price significantly lower than the firm’s acquisition cost. As the ETH market prices approached multi-month lows, the BitMine treasury’s valuation decreased from a peak of nearly $14 billion to the current $9.6 billion, leaving a significant gap between the acquisition and market prices.

The increasing paper losses are a sign of the stressed state of the crypto treasury market, where firms with large crypto balance sheets are under pressure due to market valuation and liquidity constraints. BitMine’s decreasing Market Net Asset Value (mNAV), which is a measure of the company’s enterprise value relative to its crypto assets, could make it increasingly difficult for the firm to raise capital or issue new stocks, particularly when the mNAV crosses critical levels.

Liquidity and Considerations The size of BitMine’s ETH holdings has also raised concerns about the liquidity risks associated with large, concentrated portfolios. It has been observed that if BitMine were to be faced with a situation where it had to sell off large chunks of its treasury holdings in a weak market, it could create enough downward pressure on ETH prices due to the relative size of its holdings compared to the average daily trading volumes. The current market conditions, including leveraged liquidations, ETF outflows, and macroeconomic factors, have also contributed to the current downturn in the Ethereum market.

The unrealized loss of close to $7 billion that BitMine Immersion Technologies has incurred in its Ethereum treasury portfolio is a clear indicator of the risks that a centralized crypto treasury faces in the market. With the current ETH price trading much lower than the historical acquisition price, institutional investors such as BitMine are faced with the challenge of dealing with the risks associated with valuation, liquidity, and raising capital.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto ETPs See $1.7B Weekly Outflows as Investor Sentiment Weakens

I specialize in Web3 and crypto writing, producing clear, research-driven content on blockchain, cryptocurrencies, and market trends.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:00 1mo ago
Why Is Crypto Crashing? Bitcoin Everlight's Resilience Offers Market Insights cryptonews
BTC
The most recent crash in the crypto market has undoubtedly been driven by an external shock rather than a protocol failure of any kind. The escalating conflict in the Middle East, a hawkish Federal Reserve, and prolonged economic disruption in the US are amongst the leading reasons for a broad risk-off move.

Bitcoin fell to $75,000, triggering over $2.5 billion in leveraged long liquidations in a single day and accelerating a market-wide retreat.

Within these market conditions, speculative activity is also diminishing. Bitcoin Everlight has continued to see participation during its second presale phase, offering a clear example of how engagement behaves under systemic stress.

Geopolitical Conflict and Monetary Policy Drive the Selloff There were reports of explosions taking place near Iran’s Bandar Abbas port. The rising tension between the country and the US triggered immediate risk reduction across global markets. Of course, cryptocurrencies were sold alongside equities.

This decline was further reinforced by monetary policy. On January 28, the Federal Reserve held rates at 3.50%–3.75%, with Chair Jerome Powell signaling that cuts are unlikely before late 2026. This immediately removed expectations of near-term liquidity relief. A partial US government shutdown, which now exceeds 40 days has also added to the pressure, forcing many retail participants ot liquidate crypto holdings.

Bitcoin Everlight Emerges as Participation Persists While much of the market has frozen, Bitcoin Everlight has continued to attract participation during its second presale phase. This particular activity has not been driven by momentum in its price. On the other hand, it has centered on how the network operates and how contributors participate.

The project is designed as a lightweight transaction routing layer that operates alongside Bitcoin without modifying its original protocol or its consensus rules. Bitcoin remains the settlement layer, while Everlight focuses on coordinating transactions and on execution. This separates the handling of transactions from settlement on the base layer.

BTCL Supply and Presale Progress Bitcoin Everlight operates with a fixed supply of 21,000,000,000 BTCL. Allocation is defined at launch:

45% for the public presale 20% reserved for node rewards 15% for liquidity 10% for the team under vesting 10% for ecosystem and treasury use. The presale will happen across 20 stages, starting at $0.0008 and ending at $0.0110. The project is currently in Phase 2, with BTCL priced at $0.0010, and has raised more than $250,000 during the ongoing market downturn. Presale allocations unlock 20% at token generation, with the remaining balance released linearly over six to nine months. Team allocations follow a 12-month cliff and a 24-month vesting schedule.

Node Operations and Incentive Structure The operational core of the network consists of the Everlight nodes. They do not mine blocks and are not full Bitcoin nodes. Instead, their role is limited to routing transactions, performing validation, and participating in quorum-based confirmation.

To participate, node operators have to stake BTCL tokens. The compensation comes from routing micro-fees and is adjusted by measurable factors, which include uptime, routing volume, and performance metrics such as response latency and successful delivery rates. Nodes that fall below required thresholds lose routing priority until performance recovers.

Participation tiers — Light, Core, and Prime — define routing responsibility and access to advanced roles. Higher tiers handle a greater share of transaction flow. A fixed 14-day lock period applies, supporting predictable network behavior without long-term capital immobilization.

Security Review and Accountability Measures Bitcoin Everlight’s contracts and infrastructure have undergone external technical review through the SpyWolf Auditand the SolidProof Audit. These reviews examined contract logic, structure, and implementation consistency.

Project identity verification has been completed through the SpyWolf KYC Verification and Vital Block KYC Validation, establishing traceable accountability for development and deployment.

Learn More About BTCL: Website: https://bitcoineverlight.com/

Security: https://bitcoineverlight.com/security

How to Secure: https://bitcoineverlight.com/articles/how-to-buy-bitcoin-everlight-btcl

Disclaimer: The above article is sponsored content; it’s written by a third party. CryptoPotato doesn’t endorse or assume responsibility for the content, advertising, products, quality, accuracy, or other materials on this page. Nothing in it should be construed as financial advice. Readers are strongly advised to verify the information independently and carefully before engaging with any company or project mentioned and to do their own research. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries a risk of capital loss, and readers are also advised to consult a professional before making any decisions that may or may not be based on the above-sponsored content.

Readers are also advised to read CryptoPotato’s full disclaimer.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:01 1mo ago
Step Finance Loses $30M in Major SOL Hack cryptonews
SOL STEP
📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Step Finance got hit hard. The decentralized finance platform on Solana lost between $27 million and $30 million worth of SOL tokens after hackers broke into their treasury wallets and made off with 261,854 SOL tokens in what’s become one of the biggest thefts on the Solana blockchain.

The attack sent shockwaves through DeFi circles and crushed the platform’s native STEP token, which plummeted 80% to 90% in value almost immediately after news broke. Before the hack, STEP was trading at around $0.50, but by February 1st it had crashed to roughly $0.05. The dramatic collapse shows just how fast investor confidence can evaporate when security fails in the decentralized finance world.

Details remain pretty murky. Step Finance hasn’t said much about how the attackers got in.

The company started working with blockchain security experts right after the breach to trace the stolen funds and figure out what went wrong. But they haven’t released specifics about the attack method or timeline for recovery. Users and investors are basically left waiting for updates while their money sits in limbo.

Step Finance CEO George Harrap tried to calm nerves on January 31st. “Our primary goal is to ensure the safety of our users’ assets and to prevent any future breaches,” Harrap said. The company’s also thinking about offering a bounty for info that leads to getting the stolen funds back. But that’s not really helping STEP token holders who’ve watched their investments get decimated.

The hack adds to growing security problems across DeFi. Without central authorities to help when things go wrong, users often have limited recourse when platforms get breached. And this one’s particularly painful because Solana was supposed to be the fast, cheap alternative to Ethereum.

Solana Labs finally acknowledged the breach on February 2nd. They said they’re reviewing protocols to find systemic weaknesses but didn’t give specifics. The network’s been gaining traction for its speed and low transaction costs, but now investors are questioning whether security kept pace with growth.

Major exchanges jumped into action fast. Binance and Kraken temporarily halted SOL deposits to prevent hackers from cashing out the stolen tokens. “We’re taking precautionary measures to support the investigation,” a Binance spokesperson said. The deposit freeze shows how seriously the crypto industry’s taking this breach.

Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis joined the hunt on February 2nd. They’re using advanced tracking tools to monitor any movement of the stolen SOL tokens and prevent attackers from liquidating them on exchanges. But hackers are getting smarter about covering their tracks, so there’s no guarantee they’ll recover anything.

The community’s not happy. Step Finance users flooded forums and social media demanding transparency and quick action. Many feel left in the dark about what happened and whether they’ll ever see their funds again. The platform hasn’t provided a recovery timeline or said if any money’s been found.

SOL’s price got volatile after the news broke. The token dropped to $18 but managed to recover slightly to around $20 by February 3rd. Market participants are nervous and watching every development in the investigation. Even though the hack targeted Step Finance specifically, it’s raising broader questions about Solana’s security.

Industry analysts are treating this as a potential case study for DeFi crisis management. How Step Finance handles the aftermath could influence how investors view security across decentralized platforms on Solana. The outcome might lead to stricter security standards and more scrutiny of DeFi projects.

The investigation’s still active but progress seems slow. Step Finance hasn’t announced any fund recovery or given users much hope for getting their money back. The attackers’ identities remain unknown and their methods unclear.

For now, the crypto world’s watching and waiting. The breach shows that even promising platforms on fast-growing networks like Solana aren’t immune to sophisticated attacks. Users who trusted Step Finance with their assets are learning the hard way that decentralized doesn’t always mean secure.

The stolen 261,854 SOL tokens are still out there somewhere, and time’s running out to track them down before they disappear forever into the crypto underground.

The hack exposed vulnerabilities in multi-signature wallet configurations that many DeFi protocols rely on for treasury management. Security researchers noted that Step Finance’s wallet setup may have had fewer signature requirements than industry best practices recommend, making it easier for attackers to drain funds once they gained initial access.

Solana’s validator network processed the malicious transactions without flagging unusual activity, highlighting gaps in real-time monitoring systems. Other major DeFi platforms on Solana, including Raydium and Serum, quickly conducted internal security audits following the breach. Several announced plans to upgrade their wallet security and implement additional monitoring layers to prevent similar attacks.

Post Views: 1
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:03 1mo ago
4 reasons why $75K may have been Bitcoin's 2026 price bottom cryptonews
BTC
Key takeaways:

Bitcoin fell to $74,680 after futures market liquidations, yet derivatives data show no signs of panic or extreme bearishness.

Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows reached $3.2 billion, but represent less than 3% of assets under management.

Bitcoin (BTC) price plunged to $74,680 on Monday after a total of $1.8 billion in bullish leveraged positions were liquidated since the market downturn on Thursday. Traders moved into cash and short-term government bonds, especially after silver prices fell 41% over three days. Concerns over stretched valuations in the tech sector pushed investors into a more risk-averse stance.

Traders fear that further downside for Bitcoin remains possible as gold has been selected as a clear store of value, and saw its market capitalization reach $33 trillion, an 18% rise over the past 3 months. Despite the price downside, four indicators suggest that Bitcoin may hold above $75,000 through 2026, as macroeconomic risks have eased and traders overstate the scale of outflows and the impact of BTC derivatives.

US 2-year Treasury yield (left) vs. S&P 500 index (right). Source: TradingViewYields on the US 2-year Treasury stood at 3.54% on Monday, unchanged from three weeks earlier. A surge in demand for US government-backed assets would likely have pushed yields below 3.45%, similar to October 2025, when the US entered a prolonged government funding shutdown, and nonfarm payroll data weakened.

Likewise, the S&P 500 index traded just 0.4% below its all-time high on Monday, signaling confidence in a swift resolution to the latest US government partial shutdown, which began on Saturday. US House Speaker Mike Johnson told Fox News that an agreement is expected by Tuesday, despite limited support from House Democrats.

Bitcoin derivatives show resilience despite 40.8% price dropConcerns around the artificial intelligence sector gradually eased after tech giant Oracle (ORCL US) announced plans to raise up to $50 billion in debt and equity during 2026 to meet contracted demand from its cloud customers. Investors had been unsettled by Oracle’s aggressive artificial intelligence expansion, which previously led to a 50% drop in the company’s share price, according to CNBC.

Resilience in Bitcoin derivatives suggests that professional traders have refused to turn bearish despite the 40.8% price decline from the $126,220 all-time high reached in October 2025. Periods of excessive demand for bearish positions typically trigger an inversion in Bitcoin futures, meaning those contracts trade below spot market prices.

Bitcoin 2-month futures basis rate. Source: Laevitas.chThe Bitcoin futures annualized premium (basis rate) stood at 3% on Monday, signaling weak demand for leveraged bullish positions. Under neutral conditions, the indicator usually ranges between 5% and 10% to compensate for the longer settlement period. Even so, there are no signs of stress in BTC derivatives markets, as aggregate futures open interest remains healthy at $40 billion, down 10% over the past 30 days.

Bitcoin US-listed spot ETFs daily net flows, USD. Source: CoinGlassTraders grew increasingly concerned after spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded $3.2 billion in net outflows since Jan. 16. Even so, the figure represents less than 3% of the products’ assets under management. Strategy (MSTR US) also fell victim to unfounded speculation after its shares traded below net asset value, fueling fears that the company would sell some of its Bitcoin.

Beyond the absence of covenants that would force liquidation below a specific Bitcoin price, Strategy announced $1.44 billion in cash reserves in December 2025 to cover dividend and interest obligations. Bitcoin’s price may remain under pressure as traders try to pinpoint the drivers behind the recent sell-off, but there are strong indications that the $75,000 support level may hold.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:05 1mo ago
Bitcoin Dips Below $75K As Strategy Adds 855 More Coins cryptonews
BTC
21h05 ▪ 3 min read ▪ by Luc Jose A.

Summarize this article with:

While bitcoin briefly fell below $75,000, Michael Saylor did not hesitate to strengthen his positions. The Executive Chairman of Strategy invested $75.3 million to acquire an additional 855 BTC. A strategic choice, made official via the SEC, that fits into an uninterrupted accumulation policy since 2020. In a tense market, this move confirms the long-term vision of a key player on the crypto scene.

In brief Michael Saylor took advantage of a Bitcoin drop below $75,000 to buy 855 more BTC. The purchase, totaling $75.3 million, was made official via a SEC filing. The average acquisition price stands at $87,174 per bitcoin, despite the ongoing market correction. Polymarket predictions estimate an 81% chance that Strategy will reach 800,000 BTC by 2026. A consolidated strategy : Strategy buys $75 million of BTC Strategy announced a new acquisition of 855 bitcoins for a total amount of $75.3 million, according to an 8-K form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This transaction was made at an average price of about $87,174 per BTC. Such a move comes as the price of bitcoin briefly fell below $75,000, an opportunity seen as strategic by Michael Saylor.

Here are the key facts :

Quantity purchased : 855 BTC ; Total amount invested : $75.3 million ; Average purchase price : $87,174 per unit. “Strategy currently holds about 713,000 BTC”, states the official filing, highlighting an accumulation strategy maintained despite market fluctuations. The company thus retains the status of the world’s largest institutional holder of bitcoin.

A bullish momentum anticipated by the markets ? Beyond the purchase itself, it is the projection of Strategy’s portfolio that intrigues analysts. On the prediction platform Polymarket, traders now estimate there is an 81 % probability that the company will hold 800,000 bitcoins by the end of this year.

This anticipation reflects a clear confidence in the continuity of the accumulation strategy, regardless of short-term fluctuations. The company does not communicate a precise timeline, but its steady purchase pace could continue.

For Saylor, bitcoin represents a superior store of value, a strategic asset for corporate balance sheets in a context of inflation and monetary depreciation. While this approach is being adopted by some listed companies, it also triggers criticism regarding the centralization of a significant share of BTC in the hands of a single player. The limited supply structure of bitcoin accentuates this concentration, with potential long-term effects on market liquidity.

Strategy’s continuous accumulation confirms an intact conviction in bitcoin, even during downturns. While attention turns to regulators, MSCI extends the reprieve for crypto companies like Strategy, still giving them strategic room to maneuver in an ecosystem under pressure but still evolving.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Luc Jose A.

Diplômé de Sciences Po Toulouse et titulaire d'une certification consultant blockchain délivrée par Alyra, j'ai rejoint l'aventure Cointribune en 2019. Convaincu du potentiel de la blockchain pour transformer de nombreux secteurs de l'économie, j'ai pris l'engagement de sensibiliser et d'informer le grand public sur cet écosystème en constante évolution. Mon objectif est de permettre à chacun de mieux comprendre la blockchain et de saisir les opportunités qu'elle offre. Je m'efforce chaque jour de fournir une analyse objective de l'actualité, de décrypter les tendances du marché, de relayer les dernières innovations technologiques et de mettre en perspective les enjeux économiques et sociétaux de cette révolution en marche.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:08 1mo ago
Bitcoin rebound faces resistance amid market uncertainty, bearish signals cryptonews
BTC
Bitcoin dropped nearly 11% in January, extending its losing streak to four months, the longest since 2018, amid broader market turbulence. As gold also faces a steep decline, opportunistic investors are eyeing the dip.

Summary

Bitcoin’s price remains below $80,000, as the crypto market continues to struggle amidst a broader market downturn. While U.S. stock markets showed modest gains, oil prices plunged and gold retreated from its all-time highs. Technical indicators and market sentiment suggest Bitcoin’s recovery could be a bull trap, with a potential further decline to $70,000 if it fails to regain momentum above $100,000. Bitcoin (BTC) is currently hovering just above $78,400. Indeed, the market capitalization of all coins rose by 1.7% to over $2.7 trillion, but that’s still a long ways away from its all-time high of approximately $4.1 trillion in August 2025.

Top tokens on Monday afternoon, EST, include MYX Finance, Memecore, River, Jupiter, Morpho, and Hyperliquid. 

The stock market showed modest gains: Major large-cap indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 were up 0.7% and 1.1%, respectively. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF led market gains with a 1.32% rally by midday.

Crude oil prices, meanwhile, plunged as the U.S. military assembles in the Gulf.

Brent, the global benchmark, dropped by 4.75% to $66, while the West Texas Intermediate plunged to $61. At the same time, gold, often seen as a safe-haven asset, retreated to $4,600 from the all-time high of $5,568. 

More data from Polymarket shows that the odds of the U.S. striking Iran have continued falling. Odds of strikes happening by the end of the year moved from 80% to6 69%.

The crypto crash also stalled as the Fear and Greed Index slumped to 14, its lowest level this year. In most cases, crypto rebounds occur when the index moves into the extreme fear zone.

Bitcoin price technicals suggest the rally could be a bull trap BTC price chart | Source: crypto.news The weekly chart shows that the BTC price has crashed in the past few months.

It has already flipped the Supertrend indicator from green to red. The last time this happened was in 2021, and the coin tumbled by over 70% after that.

Bitcoin has moved below the 38.2% Fibonacci Retracement level and the 50-week Exponential Moving Average. The Relative Strength Index and the Stochastic Oscillator continued falling. 

Therefore, these technical indicators suggest that the Bitcoin price may continue to fall in the near term. If this happens, it may continue falling, potentially to the 50% retracement level at $70,000. As such, there is a risk that the crypto crash will continue falling in the coming weeks. 

This view aligns with Michael Novogratz’s recent prediction when he noted that a full Bitcoin recovery will be confirmed when it moves above $100,000 and $103,000.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:14 1mo ago
Zama Debuts Token as Ethereum Privacy Volume Surpasses $121 Million cryptonews
ZAMA
TL;DR:

Zama debuts its native token following a record-breaking auction that encrypted over $121 million on Ethereum. The protocol introduces the “Total Value Shielded” (TVS) metric to measure cryptographically protected economic value. Listings on major exchanges such as Coinbase and Binance mark the start of the asset’s official trading. Open-source cryptography company Zama has just released the ZAMA token launch. By doing so, it establishes itself as the new privacy standard for the onchain ecosystem. This achievement follows a successful public auction in which more than $121 million was protected using homomorphic encryption.

We are looking at the first production-scale implementation of FHE (Fully Homomorphic Encryption) technology on the Ethereum mainnet. Through this breakthrough, Zama succeeds in eliminating the historic gap between public transparency and financial confidentiality in crypto markets.

As of now, the token is operational and available for trading on global platforms. It has already been confirmed that listings on top-tier centralized exchanges, including Coinbase and Binance, will begin progressively throughout the day.

Privacy Innovation: TVS Metric and the HTTPZ Concept Alongside the ZAMA token launch, the company introduced an innovative metric called Total Value Shielded (TVS). This concept seeks to measure the economic value maintained confidentially onchain, serving as a privacy-focused alternative to the traditional Total Value Locked (TVL) used in decentralized finance.

During the Dutch-style auction, more than 11,000 participants utilized Zama’s technology to hide their bidding strategies. As a result, the protocol demonstrated that it is possible to conduct massive token sales without publicly exposing the individual financial data of investors.

The company indicated that this launch is only the beginning of Zama’s “HTTPZ” vision, which aims to make encrypted computation a default feature on the blockchain. In this way, the firm seeks to emulate the HTTPS standard that transformed web traffic security decades ago.

In summary, the ZAMA token launch not only provides liquidity to the market but also validates a critical infrastructure for the future of Web3. Now, the industry is closely watching how this homomorphic encryption technology scales to be adopted by other protocols and developers.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:15 1mo ago
Can XRP Benefit From Artificial Intelligence? cryptonews
XRP
As one of the world's most exciting trends right now, it's natural to wonder if cryptocurrencies could benefit from AI.

In the long run, buying XRP (XRP +2.20%) is a bet that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) will become a piece of financial plumbing that financial institutions actually route value through. But many different factors influence whether that actually happens, and artificial intelligence (AI) is one of them.

So is the coin exposed to any upside stemming from the rise and proliferation of AI, or is its infrastructure too insulated from one of the decade's most powerful trends?

Image source: Getty Images.

Where AI might help XRP XRPL is built for fast and low-cost transaction settlements that can meet the regulatory compliance burden of banks and other financial businesses.

All of those features become relevant if AI agents start handling real money in the near future and use blockchains to do so. In this context, an AI agent is software that can plan and take actions toward a goal, including making payments or swapping assets. Financial regulators are already talking about agentic AI as a coming factor in mainstream finance and market structure, so this isn't science fiction any longer.

Today's Change

(

2.20

%) $

0.03

Current Price

$

1.63

If that future of AI agents transacting on various blockchains arrives soon, XRP already has rails for it.

The ledger has a feature that allows parties to stream or batch XRP payments off the main ledger and then settle them later, which might come in handy for agents. Similarly, the network's built-in decentralized exchange (DEX) can also bridge assets, though it's currently barely in use.

Don't treat XRP as an AI thesis yet While it's technically possible for XRP to benefit from AI transacting on its chain, it doesn't make much sense to include that possibility in the asset's investment thesis right now.

First, XRPL's fees are intentionally minuscule, so transaction volume is unlikely to be a major driver of the coin's price, even if agents are transacting heavily.

Second, AI adoption in finance increases compliance headaches, which can slow deployment. XRP's compliance features aren't specifically geared for AI, and also, there's not much the chain can do about financial companies needing to overhaul their own internal compliance measures before they can go big on agentic AI that handles money.

Third, Ripple, the company that issues XRP, does not currently appear to be prioritizing AI in any context. Its newer service and feature offerings are positioned around managing stablecoins and tokenized asset deposits and optimizing for on-chain liquidity, not around making XRP the unavoidable tool for every AI-based workflow.

But could XRPL evolve into a friendlier platform for agent-driven finance? Of course, and it has plenty of time and resources to do so -- assuming that this trend toward AI handling money on blockchains actually pans out. The evidence of the trend being worth chasing simply isn't there yet.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:17 1mo ago
MSTR stock faces 35% risk as MicroStrategy's Bitcoin buying continues cryptonews
BTC
MSTR stock price continued its recent downtrend on Monday as volatility in the crypto market remained. 

Summary

MSTR stock price continued its strong downward trend this week. MicroStrategy continued its Bitcoin accumulation strategy. Technical analysis suggests that MSTR may crash to $100 soon. MicroStrategy dropped to $136, down by 75% from its all-time high. It then stabilized at $145 as Bitcoin (BTC) pared back some of its earlier losses and moved above $78,000. 

Strategy also stabilized after the company revealed that it acquired 8555 coins worth over $75 million last week. It was its smallest purchase in three weeks. 

The company now holds 713,502 coins, which it bought for the average price of $76,052. At its lowest level on Monday, Strategy’s unrealized losses jumped to over $900 milllion. 

Strategy has access to more cash to continue it Bitcoin buying spree. Its buying report showed that it has access to over $8 billon worth of the MSTR stock to sell to raise capital. It also has $20 billion worth of STRK preferred shares, $4 billion of STRD, $3.6 billion of STRC, and $1.6 billion of STRD stock. 

Therefore, there is a likelihood that Saylor will use the lower Bitcoin price to continue the accumulation. His view is that Bitcoin will ultimately bounce back and move to a new record high.

History shows that Bitcoin always rebounds whenever it crashes into a bear market. For example, BTC crashed by over 35% between its highest point in January last year and its lowest point in April. It then rebounded to a record high in May. 

Bitcoin also slipped by over 70% between its highest level in 2021 and lowest level in 2022. It then surged from below $16,000 in 2022 to $126,200 in 2025. Therefore, the most likely scenario is where Bitcoin rebounds later this year.

MSTR stock price technical analysis Strategy stock chart | Source: TradingView The weekly chart shows that the MicroStrategy share price has been in a strong downward trend. It has now crashed below the 61.8% Fibonacci Retracement level, confirming the downward trend.

The Average Directional Index has jumped to 33, its highest level since March last year. A soaring ADX indicator is a sign that the downward trend is gaining momentum. 

The stock moved below all moving averages and the Supertrend indicator. Therefore, the most likely scenario is where it drops by 35% to $100 and then resumes the downward trend.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:24 1mo ago
Crypto market volatility triggers $2.5 billion in bitcoin liquidations cryptonews
BTC
Representation of cryptocurrencies are seen in this illustration taken September 10, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

SummaryCompaniesBitcoin trading below $80k after a 6% drop on SaturdayMicrosoft's Azure revenue growth disappoints, impacting AI sentimentTrump nominates Kevin Warsh for Fed, markets expect rate cutsFeb 2 (Reuters) - Bitcoin investors liquidated $2.56 billion in recent days, according to data provider CoinGlass, as cryptocurrencies slumped following a sell-off in other risk assets, including equities and precious metals.

The wipeouts in both short and long bitcoin positions are far below the record $19 billion in crypto liquidations the market experienced after U.S. President Donald Trump announced new tariffs on China. Even so, analysts say the fresh cascade of wipeouts demonstrates how sensitive the crypto market has become to risk-off sentiment.

The Week in Breakingviews newsletter offers insights and ideas from Reuters' global financial commentary team. Sign up here.

While bitcoin is notoriously volatile, cryptocurrencies have been weighed down by fresh concerns about the AI trade and a sell-off in precious metals sparked by Trump's announcement that he was picking Kevin Warsh as his Fed chair nominee.

"What we've seen the last few months is probably people taking a step back while they have to reassess their risk frameworks and how they operate in this market," said Adam McCarthy, a senior research analyst at digital market data provider Kaiko.

Bitcoin fell as low as $104,782.88 during the October 10-11 period, after setting a fresh record high just days earlier above $126,000.

It has yet to regain those peaks, and was last trading at around $78,396, after falling more than 6% on Saturday. Thin weekend liquidity also exacerbated downward moves over the weekend, Bitfinex analysts said in a Monday research report.

"The biggest risk to prices at these levels have been outside forces — whether including a sharp rise in unemployment or deterioration of the AI trade," said Jim Ferraioli, director of crypto research and strategy at Charles Schwab's Schwab Center for Financial Research.

Markets encountered a barrage of news last week that weighed heavily on investor sentiment, including disappointing Microsoft earnings that raised concerns about AI spending. Microsoft on Wednesday reported revenue growth in its Azure cloud-computing business that was only slightly above expectations, sending shares down 10% the following day.

Markets also expect Warsh to lead a shift toward rate cuts alongside tighter balance‑sheet policy, which is seen as leaning more hawkish.

That announcement sparked a sharp sell-off in gold and silver prices on Friday, with silver recording its worst day ever and gold notching its steepest daily fall since 1983.

"Investors were looking for an excuse to lighten up and they finally got several," said David Morrison, senior market analyst at Trade Nation.

Reporting by Hannah Lang in New York; editing by Michelle Price and Diane Craft

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

Hannah Lang covers financial technology and cryptocurrency, including the businesses that drive the industry and policy developments that govern the sector. Hannah previously worked at American Banker where she covered bank regulation and the Federal Reserve. She graduated from the University of Maryland, College Park and lives in Washington, DC.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:24 1mo ago
Bitcoin's price slide pushes most miner rigs into the red cryptonews
BTC
Almost all but the latest Antminer bitcoin miners are in the red following a collapse in the price of bitcoin, according to data from Antpool.

According to the data feed, only the Antminer S23 Hydro, Antminer U3S23H, and Antminer S23e U2H, all part of the S23 series unveiled last year that started shipping this month, are currently seeing healthy returns with a daily profit per hashrate measure of around $0.016/T.

Other leading models, like the Whatsminer M6 series, older Antminer products, and lesser-known brands, are currently running a deficit or nearing unprofitability, Antpool data shows. Older Antminers like the S21 series machines are nearly out of profit, according to Antpool.

Antpool and Antminer are affiliated through their associations with the Bitmain miner manufacturer.

Bitcoin has dropped to a low below $75,000 in recent days and is currently trading around $78,500, according to The Block's price page. The drop in price means miners earn less per unit of energy they provide to power the global network. This diminishing profitability comes despite a recent drop in network hashrate, attributed to the cold snap that has overtaken large parts of North America, reportedly forcing miners to curtail or shut down operations.

Still, Bitcoin's hashrate is near all-time highs, locking an all-time monthly high of 927.7 EH/s, according to The Block's data. A lower hashrate boosts block rewards per unit of hashpower for remaining online miners, improving margins temporarily despite the price decline, though the mining sector appears to remain highly competitive.

The best-performing miner, the Antminer S23 Hydro, is seeing daily returns of $ 18.53 per machine, according to Antpool. While the Antminer S21, while still in profit, is only returning $0.12 per day per machine. Whatsminer M63S, meanwhile, is reportedly losing $0.47 per day, according to Antpool.

Average monthly Bitcoin miner revenue per TH/s has been steadily declining since last August, The Block's data shows. This follows a longer trendline where miner profitability has been heading closer to the $1 per TH/s level since the market crash in 2022. Miners even faced a "profitability crisis" when bitcoin was trading at record highs last year.

Over the past several years, miners have increasingly diversified into HPC/AI services to diversify away from the increasingly competitive bitcoin mining landscape.

Of note, some of the leading publicly traded bitcoin mining stocks are also down in Monday's session, including MARA Holdings (down 2.5%), Cleanspark (6%), and HIVE Digital (10%).

Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:27 1mo ago
Bitmine Tightens Grip on Ethereum With 3.55% of Total ETH Supply cryptonews
ETH
Bitmine Immersion Technologies has crossed a milestone that is hard to ignore: the firm now controls 3.55% of Ethereum's total token supply, putting it more than 70% of the way toward its self-styled “Alchemy of 5%” goal in just six months, according to company disclosures.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:30 1mo ago
Bitcoin falls to 10-month low — Here's what to know cryptonews
BTC
Bitcoin traded at about $74,500 at its bottom on Monday – its lowest price since last April. CNBC's MacKenzie Sigalos explains.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:31 1mo ago
Is Bitcoin Sliding To Zero? ETF Outflows & Liquidations Rattle Crypto cryptonews
BTC
BTC’s retreat toward the $68K region is driven by hefty spot ETF outflows & one of the worst liquidation waves on record.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: February 2, 2026 │ 8:25 PM GMT

Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin

During a live market rundown, a daily crypto-focused host warned that Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 and heavy ETF outflows are stripping away key support and pushing the market toward what could become a deeper correction.

Sponsored

Market connoisseur Wendy O framed the past 24 hours as “absolutely brutal,” with cascading liquidations, stressed altcoins, and even precious metals showing unusual volatility.

Liquidations & a Possible Test Of The 200-Week EMAThe host pegged Bitcoin around $77,000 during the stream and highlighted a downside target near $68,000, tied to the 200-week exponential moving average. A decisive break below that level, she said, would mark the point where “things are going to get really, really, really nasty” echoing conditions last seen during the 2022–2023 bear market when BTC traded under the 200-week EMA for an extended stretch.

My high time frame targets for BTC
200 EMA: ~$68.4k
300 EMA: ~$56.7k

Historically the 21 Weekly EMA is a great indicator of the market trend (yellow MA). We wicked up straight into it and confirm further bearish bias towards lower moving averages. https://t.co/nzUprUbpYR pic.twitter.com/4qbk9uWtHC

— Greeny (@greenytrades) January 29, 2026 Leveraged traders were hit hard. Roughly $1.5–$1.6 billion in crypto positions were liquidated over 24 hours, making it one of the worst liquidation events in the industry’s history. Most of the damage came from over-leveraged longs, particularly in Ethereum. The host noted that some traders had positioned for an ETH move higher, only to be wiped out as the market reversed.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs, once seen as a stabilizing force, are now a source of concern. The commentator cited figures showing around $1.6 billion in net withdrawals this month and roughly $6 billion leaving U.S.-listed spot products over the past three months. Since early 2026, the ETFs have reportedly seen an exodus of about 4,500–4,600 BTC, compared with tens of thousands flowing in over the same period a year earlier.

Altcoin Pain Meets MicroStrategy Risk & E-File FalloutAltcoins are faring worse. The host said “altcoins are suffering, they’re struggling, they’re going down” while pointing to Ethereum’s fall toward key support near $2,200 and the possibility of a move to $1,500. They also mentioned Solana weakness and noted that XRP had recently tagged a higher target level that some analysts had been watching.

MicroStrategy’s aggressive Bitcoin strategy was flagged as a risk point.

The company’s heavy use of debt to accumulate BTC has long been debated, and the host suggested that if its position were ever forced or “knocked out” the knock-on effects for Bitcoin and related derivatives could be severe. While they did not predict such an outcome, they framed MicroStrategy as “in a little bit of hot water” if prices slide far enough.

Beyond price action, Wendy O addressed newly surfaced “E-files” that mention names from the crypto sector, including figures connected to Ripple and Stellar (XLM).

One cited email from 2014, involving early industry investors, described Ripple and Stellar as “bad for the ecosystem” and raised concerns about backing “two horses in the same race.” The commentator stressed that, in the material they reviewed, there were no explicit allegations of criminal behavior against those crypto teams—only competitive and funding-related tensions.

She repeatedly urged viewers to be cautious about unverified claims circulating on social media, especially in an era of AI-generated forgeries, and to distinguish between reputational damage by association and documented wrong-doing.

Why This MattersThe host argued that the combination of ETF outflows, heavy liquidations, and macro stress effectively places crypto in a new bear phase, even if the broader cycle structure remains intact.

She expects Bitcoin to consolidate roughly between $74,000 and $80,000 in the short term, with a meaningful risk of a test near $68,000 and, for some analysts, even the $55,000 region.

For strategy, the commentator pushed dollar-cost averaging over short-term trading, warning that “most people think we get into Bitcoin and crypto, we’re going to be expert traders… that’s not how it works.” They framed current conditions as an entry window for long-term investors who understand volatility, while cautioning against panic trades or chasing leverage during a period of heightened uncertainty and ongoing regulatory and political noise.

Check out DailyCoin’s hottest crpyto news now:
SWIFT Embraces XRP’s Playbook: Real-Time Transfers Coming
Bitcoin Tests $75,000 as Risk-Off Trade Sweeps Crypto

People Also Ask:Is Bitcoin’s price going to zero?

According to the YouTube show host, no. She described Bitcoin as “too big to fail,” while acknowledging that some altcoins can and likely will go to zero.

How bad could the correction get?

The commentator discussed historical 70–80% BTC drawdowns but did not predict a repeat, instead highlighting possible zones around $68,000 and, for some market bettors, the mid-$50,000s.

Are spot Bitcoin ETFs still important?

Yes. Even with recent outflows, the host emphasized that ETF flows materially affect BTC’s “floor,” and large withdrawals remove a key Bitcoin price support layer.

What should inexperienced traders do now?

The host favored systematic dollar-cost averaging with disposable income, rather than trying to time short-term moves or trade big on leverage in a highly volatile market.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.
2026-02-02 20:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 15:31 1mo ago
Solana Gains Encrypted Capital Markets as Arcium Launches Mainnet Alpha cryptonews
SOL
Arcium has launched its Mainnet Alpha on Solana, introducing encrypted execution as a native infrastructure layer and marking a significant step toward privacy-preserving finance and AI on public blockchains.

Arcium CEO Yannik Schrade said the project reframes privacy as a core design primitive rather than a niche feature, introducing a general-purpose encrypted execution environment that expands what is possible for internet-native financial systems.

The first application to deploy on Mainnet Alpha is Umbra, which brings a shielded finance layer to Solana. Umbra supports encrypted transfers and private swaps and has launched with controlled access, onboarding 100 users per week under a $500 deposit limit. Broader access is expected in February following additional stress testing.

Developer activity around Arcium has increased since its testnet debut in May 2025, with projects such as Melee, Vanish, and Anonmesh building integrations. The roadmap also includes Confidential SPL, which aims to enable confidential tokens directly on Solana.

Source: Arcium, Umbra

Disclaimer: Crypto Economy Flash News is prepared using official and publicly available sources verified by our editorial team. Its purpose is to provide rapid updates on relevant developments within the crypto and blockchain ecosystem.

This information does not constitute financial advice or an investment recommendation. We recommend always verifying official project channels before making related decisions.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:12 1mo ago
Undercovered Dozen: POET Technologies, Pan American Silver, MercadoLibre, AT&T And More stocknewsapi
MELI PAAS POET POETD T
HomeStock IdeasQuick Picks & Lists

SummaryThe Undercovered Dozen spotlights 12 lesser-covered stocks with compelling investment theses.Highlighted companies include POET Technologies, Pan American Silver, MercadoLibre, Willdan Group, and Uranium Energy, each rated Strong Buy on compelling catalysts.Key themes are AI infrastructure upgrades, precious metals rallies, deep value in Latin American e-commerce, grid modernization, and uranium sector growth.Several funds and ETFs, such as MLPI and UTF, offer high yields or sector-specific exposure with tactical advantages for income-focused investors.Readers are encouraged to share their thoughts and suggest additional undercovered stocks worth following. Cavan Images/iStock via Getty Images

The Undercovered Dozen is a weekly Seeking Alpha editor-curated series highlighting 12 articles on lesser-covered stocks from the previous seven days. We hope this provides ideas and inspires discussion among the community.

Today, we're looking

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given that any particular security, portfolio, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The author is not advising you personally concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security or other matter. You alone are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, security or strategy, or any product or service, is appropriate or suitable for you based on your investment objectives and personal and financial situation. The author is an employee of Seeking Alpha. Any views or opinions expressed herein may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:12 1mo ago
Meta's Ad Engine Powers Growth Despite Soaring Costs: Analyst stocknewsapi
META
Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ: META) stock surged after the company said ad sales are picking up fast and profits will keep growing, giving Wall Street fresh confidence that its AI push is paying off. The big question now is whether that momentum can hold as Meta ramps up spending on data centers, chips, and new tech to fuel its next wave of growth.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:15 1mo ago
Avery Dennison Stock to Report Q4 Earnings: Here's What to Expect stocknewsapi
AVY
Key Takeaways Avery Dennison to report Q4 results on Feb. 4, with revenues estimated to rise 4.9% y/y.Improved volumes across segments likely helped, while higher raw material and freight costs weighed.Materials Group revenues are expected to rise 5.2% to $1.55B, driven by base business and specialty labels. Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY - Free Report) is scheduled to report fourth-quarter 2025 results before the opening bell on Feb. 4, 2026.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AVY’s fourth-quarter revenues is pegged at $2.29 billion, indicating a 4.9% rise from the year-ago reported figure.

The consensus estimate for AVY’s earnings has moved down in the past 60 days. The consensus estimate is pegged at $2.40 per share, indicating a year-over-year rise of 0.8%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

AVY’s Earnings Surprise HistoryAvery Dennison’s earnings beat the Zacks Consensus Estimates in three of the trailing four quarters and missed in one, the average surprise being 0.9%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

What the Zacks Model Unveils for Avery DennisonOur proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for AVY this time around. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the chances of an earnings beat. But that is not the case here, as you can see below.

You can uncover the best stocks before they are reported with our Earnings ESP Filter.

Earnings ESP: Avery Dennison has an Earnings ESP of -1.46%.

Zacks Rank: AVY currently carries a Zacks Rank #3.

Factors Likely to Have Shaped AVY’s Q4 PerformanceAvery Dennison’s fourth-quarter results are likely to reflect improved volumes in both its segments. However, higher raw material, labor and freight costs are expected to have impacted the company’s margins. The impacts are anticipated to have been offset by AVY’s productivity improvement and cost-saving actions.

Our model predicts the Materials Group segment’s revenues to rise 5.2% year over year in the quarter to $1.55 billion. The upside will be driven by growth in the base business and high-value categories, led by specialty labels. Our estimate for the Materials Group segment’s adjusted operating profit is pinned at $237 million, indicating year-over-year growth of 8.9%.

Normalized growth in apparel is expected to have aided the Solutions Group segment's growth. Our model predicts the Solutions Group segment’s revenues to be $746 million, indicating an increase of 4.5% from the prior-year quarter’s actual.
Our estimate for the segment’s operating profit is pinned at $69.5 million, indicating a decrease of 14.4% from the year-ago quarter’s reported figure.

Avery Dennison Stock’s Price PerformanceAVY shares have gained 3.3% in the past year against the industry’s decline of 4.8%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Stocks That Warrant a LookHere are some companies with the right combination of elements to post an earnings beat in their upcoming releases.

Trimble Inc. (TRMB - Free Report) , slated to release fourth-quarter 2025 results on Feb. 10, has an Earnings ESP of +1.91% and a Zacks Rank of 2 at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Trimble’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings is pegged at 96 cents per share, suggesting a year-over-year rise of 7.9%. TRMB has a trailing four-quarter average surprise of 7.4%.

Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB - Free Report) , slated to release fourth-quarter 2025 results on Feb. 3, has an Earnings ESP of +0.52% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Hubbell’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings is pegged at $4.70 per share, suggesting a year-over-year rise of 14.6%. HUBB has a trailing four-quarter average surprise of 8.5%.

Tenaris S.A. (TS - Free Report) , slated to release fourth-quarter 2025 results soon, has an Earnings ESP of +12.86% and a Zacks Rank of 3 at present.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Tenaris’ fourth-quarter 2025 earnings is pegged at 76 cents per share, suggesting a year-over-year dip of 19%. TS has a trailing four-quarter average surprise of 18.9%.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:15 1mo ago
Carpenter Technology Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates, Revenues Rise 8% Y/Y stocknewsapi
CRS
Key Takeaways CRS delivered Q2 adjusted EPS of $2.33, beating estimates and rising sharply from the prior-year quarter.Revenues rose 7.5% y/y to $728M, driven by strength in the Aerospace, Defense and Energy markets.Carpenter Technology posted record adjusted operating income of $155M as margins expanded to 21.3%. Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS - Free Report) reported adjusted earnings of $2.33 per share for second-quarter fiscal 2026, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.20. It had posted adjusted earnings of $1.66 in the year-ago quarter. The upside was driven by ongoing improvements in the product mix and expanding operating efficiencies.

Including one-time items, earnings per share were $2.09 in the quarter compared with $1.66 in the year-ago quarter.

Net revenues increased 7.5% year over year to $728 million in the reported quarter. The figure missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $729 million. 

CRS witnessed a year-over-year revenue increase of 15.3% in the Aerospace and Defense end-use market. Revenues in the Energy end-market rose 19.3%. The metric for the Medical end-use markets moved down 22.3%. Revenues in the Distribution markets decreased 14.1%, whereas Industrial and Consumer end-use market revenues rose 10.1%. The Transportation end-use market’s revenues fell 19.2%

CRS’s Q2 Operational ResultsThe cost of goods sold in second-quarter fiscal 2026 moved up 2.1% year over year to $510 million. Gross profit increased 23% year over year to $218 million. The gross margin came in at 30% compared with the prior-year quarter’s 26.2%. 

Adjusted operating income in the reported quarter was a record $155 million compared with the prior-year quarter’s $119 million. The adjusted operating margin in the quarter under review was 21.3% compared with 17.6% in the year-ago quarter.

Carpenter Technology’s Q2 Segmental PerformanceThe Specialty Alloys Operations segment reported sales of $662 million compared with the prior-year quarter’s $602 million. We predicted the segment’s sales to be $672 million. The segment sold 46,836 pounds compared with the year-ago quarter’s 44,714 pounds. The reported figure missed our estimate of 44,956 pounds. The segment posted an operating profit of $175 million compared with the prior-year quarter’s $136 million. Our estimate for the segment’s operating profit was $171 million.

The Performance Engineered Products’ net sales fell 12.4% year over year to $83 million. The reported figure missed our estimate of $99 million. The segment sold 2,218 pounds compared with the year-ago quarter’s 2,208 pounds. It was higher than our projection of 2,199 pounds. The segment reported an operating profit of $6.9 million, a dip of 1.4% year over year. Our estimate for the segment’s operating profit was $9.4 million.

CRS’ Cash Flow & Balance Sheet UpdatesCarpenter Technology ended second-quarter fiscal 2026 with cash and cash equivalents of $232 million compared with $315.5 million at the end of fiscal 2025. The long-term debt was $690 million at the end of the quarter compared with $695 million as of the end of fiscal 2025. 

Cash flow from operating activities was $132 million in the quarter under review compared with $68 million in the prior-year quarter.

Carpenter Technology’s Guidance for FY26CRS expects operating income of $680-$700 million for fiscal 2026 compared with the prior stated $660-$700 million. 

It expects the fiscal third-quarter operating income to be $177-$182 million.

CRS’s Share Price PerformanceShares of the company have surged 66.9% in the past year compared with the industry’s growth of 72.6%.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Carpenter Technology’s Zacks RankCRS currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

Peer PerformanceCommercial Metals Company (CMC - Free Report) reported earnings per share of $1.84 for the first quarter of fiscal 2026 compared with 78 cents in the year-ago quarter. Commercial Metals’ bottom line beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.55. 
The company’s net revenues in the reported quarter were $2.12 billion, up 11% year over year. The reported figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.99 billion.

Steel - Specialty Stock Awaiting ResultsMetallus Inc. (MTUS - Free Report) is scheduled to release fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results on Feb. 19. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Metallus’s fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 earnings is pegged at 5 cents per share. MTUS reported a loss of 8 cents in the year-ago quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Metallus’ top line is pegged at $290 million, indicating growth of 20% from the prior-year reported figure.

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. (NWPX - Free Report) is scheduled to release fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results soon.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NWPX Infrastructure’s fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 earnings is pegged at 62 cents per share, indicating a year-over-year dip of 38%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NWPX Infrastructure’s top line is pegged at $121.5 million, indicating growth of 1.6% from the prior-year reported figure.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:15 1mo ago
C&F Financial Q4 Earnings Rise Y/Y on Loan Growth, Margin Gains stocknewsapi
CFFI
Shares of C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI - Free Report) have gained 5.1% since reporting results for the fourth quarter of 2025. This compares with the S&P 500 index’s 0.1% decline over the same time frame. Over the past month, the stock has gained 8.3% compared with the S&P 500’s 0.8% return.

C&F Financial reported consolidated net income of $6.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2025, up 11% from $6 million in the year-ago quarter. For the year ended Dec. 31, 2025, net income rose 36% to $27 million from $19.9 million in 2024.

Earnings per share for the fourth quarter increased to $2.07 from $1.87 a year earlier, while full-year EPS climbed to $8.29 from $6.01. Profitability metrics also improved on an annual basis, with return on average assets rising to 1.01% from 0.80% and return on average equity increasing to 11.11% from 9.02%.

Other Key Business MetricsBalance sheet growth remained a notable theme during the period. Total assets increased to $2.77 billion as of Dec. 31, 2025, compared with $2.56 billion a year earlier. Deposits grew 8.1% year over year to $2.35 billion, reflecting higher balances across time deposits, savings, money market and non-interest-bearing accounts. Loan growth was led by the community banking segment, where loans increased by $136.7 million, or 9.4%, from that reported on Dec. 31, 2024. Average loans for the consolidated company rose 10% for the year, whereas average deposits increased 7.2% year over year.

Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis increased to $107.4 million for the year, up from $97.9 million in 2024. This improvement was supported by higher yields on loans and securities and balance sheet growth. The consolidated net interest margin expanded to 4.21% for the year from 4.12% in the prior year. Asset quality indicators remained relatively stable, with community banking non-accrual loans at 0.07% of total loans at the year-end, up from 0.02% a year earlier, while the allowance for credit losses declined slightly as a percentage of total loans.

Management CommentaryManagement emphasized the benefits of a diversified business model in driving improved performance during 2025. The chief executive officer highlighted growth in loans and deposits in the community banking segment, increased wealth advisory revenues, higher mortgage loan originations and efforts to enhance operational efficiencies in the consumer finance segment as key contributors to earnings growth.

Management also pointed to improvement in the net interest margin, strong liquidity and capital positions, and solid asset quality as indicators of the company’s overall financial strength.

Factors Influencing Headline NumbersHigher interest income was a primary driver of the year-over-year earnings increase, supported by growth in average loan balances and higher yields on securities. These gains were partially offset by higher interest expenses, reflecting increased balances of interest-bearing deposits, as well as higher non-interest expenses.

Salaries and employee benefits rose due to incentive accruals tied to improved performance and the addition of a seasoned lending team as the company expanded into Southwest Virginia. Marketing and advertising expenses also increased in connection with a strategic marketing initiative launched in the second half of 2024.

Provision for credit losses had a mixed impact across segments.

The community banking segment recorded a net reversal of provision for credit losses for the year compared with a provision in 2024 due to the resolution of a non-performing commercial real estate loan.

In contrast, the consumer finance segment recorded provisions consistent with the prior year, reflecting ongoing credit costs in that portfolio.

Mortgage banking results benefited from higher loan originations and increased gains on sales of loans despite elevated mortgage rates and constrained housing inventory.

GuidanceManagement reiterated its commitment to executing a strategic plan focused on leveraging core strengths, expanding in targeted markets, and maintaining disciplined balance sheet and risk management practices. The company signaled an ongoing emphasis on expanding loans, maintaining a stable deposit base, and improving operational efficiency in future periods.

Other DevelopmentsThe company authorized a share repurchase program in December 2025, allowing for the repurchase of up to $5 million of common stock between Jan. 1, 2026, and Dec. 31, 2026, following the expiration of a similar program in 2025 under which no shares were repurchased. The company also declared total cash dividends of $1.84 per share for 2025, reflecting a payout ratio of 22.2% of earnings. These actions underscore management’s focus on capital management, alongside organic growth initiatives.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:15 1mo ago
Coherent Q2 Earnings Preview: Buy Now or Wait for the Results? stocknewsapi
COHR
COHR moves ahead to post 2Q26 results, with revenue estimates of $1.6B, a rising EPS forecast and strong AI-driven demand aiding the company.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:16 1mo ago
Wave Life Sciences Reclaims Rare Disease Drug From GSK, Targets Faster FDA Path stocknewsapi
GSK WVE
On Monday, Wave Life Sciences Ltd. (NASDAQ: WVE) said it regained full rights to WVE-006 from GSK Plc (NYSE: GSK).
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:21 1mo ago
Dream Impact Trust Q4 2025 Financial Results Release Date, Webcast and Conference Call stocknewsapi
DDHRF
-

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--DREAM IMPACT TRUST (TSX: MPCT.UN) (“Dream Impact” or the “Trust”) will be releasing its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, on Tuesday, February 17, 2026.

Senior management will be hosting a conference call to discuss the financial results. Participants may join the conference call by audio or webcast.

Conference Call:

Date:

Wednesday, February 18, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. (ET)

Audio:

1-800-715-9871 (toll free)

647-932-3411 (toll)

Webcast:

A live webcast will also be available in listen-only mode. To access the simultaneous webcast, go to the Calendar of Events on the News and Events page on Dream Impact Trust’s website at www.dreamimpacttrust.ca and click the link for the webcast.

Digital Replay:

A taped replay of the call will be available for ninety (90) days. For access details, please click on the Calendar of Events on Dream Impact’s website.

About Dream Impact

Dream Impact Trust is an open-ended trust dedicated to impact investing. Dream Impact's underlying portfolio is comprised of exceptional real estate assets reported under two operating segments: development and recurring income, that would not be otherwise available in a public and fully transparent vehicle, managed by an experienced team with a successful track record in these areas. The objectives of Dream Impact are to create positive and lasting impacts for our stakeholders through our three impact verticals: environmental sustainability and resilience, attainable and affordable housing, and inclusive communities. For more information, please visit: www.dreamimpacttrust.ca.

More News From Dream Impact Trust

Back to Newsroom
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:22 1mo ago
Dream Industrial REIT Q4 2025 Financial Results Release Date, Webcast and Conference Call stocknewsapi
DREUF
-

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--DREAM INDUSTRIAL REIT (TSX: DIR.UN) (“Dream Industrial”) will be releasing its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, on Tuesday, February 17, 2026.

Senior management will be hosting a conference call to discuss the financial results. Participants may join the conference call by audio or webcast.

Conference Call:

  Date:

Wednesday, February 18, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. (ET)

  Audio:

1-800-715-9871 (toll free)

647-932-3411 (toll)

  Webcast:

A live webcast will also be available in listen-only mode. To access the simultaneous webcast, go to the Calendar of Events on the News and Events page on Dream Industrial REIT’s website at www.dreamindustrialreit.ca and click the link for the webcast.

  Digital Replay:

A taped replay of the call will be available for ninety (90) days. For access details, please click on the Calendar of Events on Dream Industrial’s website.

About Dream Industrial

Dream Industrial REIT is an owner, manager and operator of a global portfolio of well-located, diversified industrial properties. As at September 30, 2025, Dream Industrial REIT has an interest in and manages a portfolio which comprises 340 industrial assets (552 buildings) totalling approximately 73.2 million square feet of gross leasable area in key markets across Canada, Europe, and the U.S. Dream Industrial REIT’s objective is to deliver strong total returns to its unitholders through secure distributions as well as growth in net asset value and cash flow per unit underpinned by its high-quality portfolio and an investment grade balance sheet. Dream Industrial REIT is an unincorporated, open-ended real estate investment trust. For more information, please visit our website at www.dreamindustrialreit.ca.

More News From Dream Industrial REIT

Back to Newsroom
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:23 1mo ago
Dream Office REIT Q4 2025 Financial Results Release Date, Webcast and Conference Call stocknewsapi
DRETF
-

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--DREAM OFFICE REIT (TSX: D.UN) (“Dream Office”) will be releasing its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, on Thursday, February 19, 2026.

Senior management will be hosting a conference call to discuss the financial results. Participants may join the conference call by audio or webcast.

Conference Call:

  Date:

Friday, February 20, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)

  Audio:

1-800-715-9871 (toll free)

647-932-3411 (toll)

  Webcast:

A live webcast will also be available in listen-only mode. To access the simultaneous webcast, go to the Calendar of Events on the News and Events page on Dream Office’s website at www.dreamofficereit.ca and click on the link for the webcast.

  Digital Replay:

A taped replay of the call will be available for ninety (90) days. For access details, please click on the Calendar of Events on Dream Office’s website.

About Dream Office

Dream Office REIT is an unincorporated, open-ended real estate investment trust. Dream Office REIT is a premier office landlord in downtown Toronto with over 4.0 million square feet owned and managed. We have carefully curated an investment portfolio of high-quality assets in irreplaceable locations in one of the finest office markets in the world. For more information, please visit our website at www.dreamofficereit.ca.

More News From Dream Office REIT

Back to Newsroom
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:24 1mo ago
Twist Bioscience: Ingenious Product Still Lacks Compelling Use Cases stocknewsapi
TWST
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:25 1mo ago
Securities Fraud Investigation Into PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) Announced – Shareholders Who Lost Money Urged To Contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz stocknewsapi
PFSI
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces an investigation of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (“PennyMac” or the “Company”) (NYSE: PFSI) on behalf of investors concerning the Company's possible violations of federal securities laws. IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO LOST MONEY ON PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (PFSI), CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING A CLAIM TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS. What Is The Investigation About? On January 29, 2026, PennyMac released.
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:25 1mo ago
Dream Unlimited Corp. Q4 2025 Financial Results Release Date, Webcast and Conference Call stocknewsapi
DRUNF
-

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dream Unlimited Corp. (TSX: DRM) (“Dream”) will be releasing its financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, on Tuesday, February 24, 2026.

Senior management will be hosting a conference call to discuss the financial results. Participants may join the conference call by audio or webcast.

Conference Call:

Date:

  Tuesday, February 24, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

  Audio:

  1-800-715-9871 (toll free)

  647-932-3411 (toll)

  Webcast:

  A live webcast will also be available in listen-only mode. To access the simultaneous webcast, go to the Calendar of Events on the News and Events page on Dream’s website at www.dream.ca and click on the link for the webcast.

  Digital Replay:

  A taped replay of the call will be available for ninety (90) days. For access details, please click on the Calendar of Events on Dream’s website.

About Dream

Dream is a leading real estate developer and has an established and successful asset management business, inclusive of $28 billion of assets under management across four Toronto Stock Exchange listed trusts, our private asset management business and numerous partnerships as at September 30, 2025. We develop land and housing in our master planned communities in Western Canada and hold a growing portfolio of income generating properties across Canada. Dream expects this area of our business to grow as investment properties under construction are completed and held for the long term. Dream has a proven track record for being innovative and for our ability to source, structure and execute on compelling investment opportunities. For more information, please visit our website at www.dream.ca.

More News From Dream Unlimited Corp.

Back to Newsroom
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:25 1mo ago
Here are the retailers with the most store openings and closures planned for 2026 stocknewsapi
DG GME TSCO WBA
Store openings in the U.S. are expected to rise and store closures fall this year compared to the 2025, with value retailers leading the growth as they continue to attract more of consumers' dollars, according to an analysis by Coresight Research.

Overall, Coresight projects that U.S. retailers will close about 7,900 stores in 2026, a 4.5% drop year over year. That would represent the lowest number of total store closures in the past three years.

The advisory group also expects retailers will open about 5,500 new stores, a 4.4% increase year over year.

So far, Dollar General, Aldi and Tractor Supply top the list for retailers with the most planned store openings this year, according to Coresight. On the other hand, GameStop, Francesca's and Walgreens lead the way with the most planned closures in 2026.

John Mercer, head of global research of Coresight, said he expects some closely watched economic factors, such as high inflation and the slow housing market, to gradually ease in the coming year. He said retailers' real estate plans also reflect "an incremental improvement over 2025 but not a major inflection point."

Some themes for the retail industry persist and show in the data. Department stores and legacy retailers are slimming down their store counts. Value players including discounters, warehouse clubs and off-price chains are bulking up their national footprint. Successful and reinvented mall retailers, such as Abercrombie & Fitch and Gap, are squeezing out smaller specialty apparel retailers.

In the first few weeks of the year, there have already been some major store closure announcements. Video game retailer GameStop plans to shutter hundreds of locations, following a significant wave of previous closures. Women's fashion chain Francesca's, which sells clothing and accessories, is closing its nearly 460 stores as the company liquidates its business after a bankruptcy filing. And Amazon said it will shutter all Amazon Fresh and Amazon Go locations and turn some of those into Whole Foods Market stores, marking the end of the e-commerce giant's latest brick-and-mortar experiment in the grocery industry.

Last year, store closures were expected to hit the highest level since the Covid pandemic. Yet the final tally came in at 8,270 closures — down from 8,825 in 2024 and 9,700 in 2020.

"We saw a lot of things we didn't expect and a lot of things we didn't expect were on the upside," Mercer said.

Among them, higher tariffs didn't ding consumer spending as much as feared because retailers imported early shipments and absorbed some of those higher costs. Affluent Americans, who have benefitted from strong stock market gains and rising property values, have kept spending and propped up the retail industry. They have been the thriving part of the so-called K-shaped economy.

Last year, retail bankruptcies drove much of the downsizing, with 32 retailers filing for bankruptcy last year. Rite Aid, Joann, Party City and Big Lots topped the list of the most shuttered stores last year.

Other drugstores contributed significantly to closures last year, too, with Walgreens and CVS Health each shrunk their store footprints.

So far this year, two retailers have filed for bankruptcy: Saks Global, the parent company of luxury department stores Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus, and LKM Convenience, a Louisiana-based operator of convenience store brands Brothers Food Mart and Magnolia Express.

Shorter real estate supplyAn expected slowdown of bankruptcies could tighten real estate demand, said Naveen Jaggi, president of retail advisory services for JLL, a commercial real estate company that works primarily in larger and fast-growing U.S. retail markets like Chicago, New York City and Dallas.

Many of the retailers opening stores in 2026 hammered out their real estate deals back in 2024, a year when a large amount of space opened up because companies including Bed Bath & Beyond, Joann and Forever 21 shuttered stores after bankruptcy filings.

"We are looking at a world of dwindling supply," he said. "That is going to become a challenge in 2029 and 2030."

Similar to the housing market, construction of new strip malls has been sluggish because of higher labor costs and elevated interest rates. That tide may turn and developers could break ground more if labor and borrowing costs stabilize and retailers show they're willing to pay enough to fund those builds, Jaggi said.

Not only are retailers competing for space with their closest peers, he said they're also vying for square footage in the same strip malls with expanding food and beverage concepts and chains like Raising Cane's, along with pilates and fitness studios.

"Shopping centers that are trying to grow up and mature like to bring in those national name brands like Soulcycle," Jaggi said. "You can pop out a GameStop and pop in a Soulcycle."

As retailers open new stores, customers' adoption of artificial intelligence chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and similar to discover merchandise or get shopping advice is challenging retailers to think about what they can offer customers in person, Coresight's Mercer said.

He said for brick-and-mortar locations to complement retailers' e-commerce offerings, a store needs to provide convenience and immediacy, offer ease of pickup or returns, give compelling enough discounts to offset downsides of in-person retail or become an experiential destination.

"Stores are great brand builders," he said. "If you think about agentic commerce, it's great for comparison shopping. Stores are a great way to build value in that brand and separate yourself from the race to the bottom on price."
2026-02-02 19:38 1mo ago
2026-02-02 14:26 1mo ago
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Urges Gauzy Ltd Investors with Large Losses to Contact the Firm Before February 6th Lead Plaintiff Deadline stocknewsapi
GAUZ
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Partner Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Gauzy (GAUZ) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired Gauzy securities between March 11, 2025 and November 13, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Melissa Forunato directly at (212) 355-4648.

Click here to participate in the action.

NEW YORK, Feb. 02, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

What’s Happening:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized stockholder rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Gauzy Ltd (“Gauzy” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:GAUZ) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy securities between March 11, 2025 and November 13, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”).Investors have until February 6, 2026 to apply to the Court to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. Allegation Details:

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) three of Gauzy’s French subsidiaries lacked the financial means to meet their debts as they became due; (2) as a result, it was substantially likely insolvency proceedings would be commenced; (3) as a result, it was substantially likely a potential default under Gauzy’s existing senior secured debt facilities would be triggered; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about Gauzy’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. Next Steps:

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy shares and suffered a loss, are a long-term stockholder, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Melissa Fortunato by email at [email protected], telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out this contact form. There is no cost or obligation to you. About Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is a nationally recognized law firm with offices in New York, South Carolina, and California. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in securities, derivative, and commercial litigation as well as individuals in consumer protection and data privacy litigation. The firm has a nationwide practice and routinely handles cases in both federal and state courts. For more information about the firm, please visit www.bespc.com. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn and Facebook, and keep up with other news by following Brandon Walker, Esq. on LinkedIn.

Contact Information:

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C.
Brandon Walker, Esq.
Melissa Fortunato, Esq.
(212) 355-4648
[email protected]
www.bespc.com