Market Signal Briefing

In October 2022, Elon Musk spent $44 billion to acquire social media platform Twitter. Subsequently, the serial entrepreneur took the company private and rebranded it to X. Next month, the platform is set to launch X Money as Musk continues his ambitions to build an "everything app."

Now, Dogecoin (DOGE +1.91%) finds itself at the center of new speculation as the meme coin has long ridden hype waves connected to Musk's influence. With X rolling out a payments feature, could this update finally deliver the utility and price surge that investors have been waiting for?

Image source: Getty Images.

Why has Dogecoin traded sideways for over a year? The primary tailwind behind Dogecoin's last surge was the Trump administration's creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) -- and his tapping Musk to lead the effort. Despite the pronounced rally, inevitable headwinds ultimately formed given Dogecoin's limited real-world adoption beyond its loyal, albeit small, community.

Given its lack of concrete catalysts, Dogecoin has largely remained range-bound -- consolidating between roughly $0.09 and $0.15 for about a year now.

Dogecoin Price data by YCharts

What causes Dogecoin's price to rise? Dogecoin's rallies have historically been driven by viral memes and social media buzz rather than by legitimate financial fundamentals.

In addition, Musk has played a central role in putting Dogecoin on the radar of crypto enthusiasts. The billionaire has previously referred to himself as the "Dogefather" and even accepted the cryptocurrency as a payment method for the online shops at his other companies, Tesla and SpaceX.

At the end of the day, Dogecoin's price remains highly tethered to fleeting hype cycles, celebrity endorsements, and sentiment around unpredictable meme culture.

Today's Change

(

1.91

%) $

0.00

Current Price

$

0.09

Will X Money revive Dogecoin? For now, X Money will be a fiat-based peer-to-peer system in partnership with Visa. Despite the initial rollout focusing on traditional payments, I would not be surprised if crypto integration eventually becomes a feature.

Even if this does not materialize, the mere idea of including Dogecoin to send payments and spend money on digital assets through X could easily reignite enthusiasm.

Dogecoin's extreme volatility and limited utility make it more of a high-risk trade than a reliable store of value. While the launch of X Money may offer a compelling narrative for a 2026 Dogecoin surge, investors seeking to build durable wealth should avoid chasing the coin's momentum on such imaginary scenarios.

Ethereum (ETH) network fees jumped roughly 36% over a single day as a burst of real-world asset (RWA) settlement activity and stablecoin flows concentrated into narrow time windows, tightening available blockspace and driving a sharp uplift in revenue. The move is notable not because of a simple price-linked spike in usage, but because it signals a shift toward 'high-value' payment and settlement demand—activity that tends to be stickier than speculative trading.

Market data showed ETH down about 2.69% on a snapshot basis during the same period, underscoring that the fee surge was not merely a function of token price momentum. Instead, the fee dynamics reflected intraday congestion as larger, institution-oriented transactions hit Ethereum mainnet and its Layer 2 (L2) networks simultaneously.

A key catalyst highlighted by market watchers is the expanding role of Circle ($CRCL) in onchain settlement—particularly its Arc L1 initiative and the broader scaling of USDC-based RWA payments. Arc is being framed less as a standalone chain and more as a payments and settlement rail designed to pull institutional capital onchain. As tokenized instruments such as U.S. Treasuries, T-bills, and commodities are increasingly settled using USD Coin (USDC) on Ethereum L2s, large batch transactions can cluster around specific cutoffs, amplifying temporary congestion and fee generation.

In that context, Ethereum’s fee revenue begins to resemble 'real yield' rather than simple transactional friction. The demand driver is not meme-coin speculation or retail bursts, but recurring clearing and settlement needs tied to institutional workflows. For Ethereum, this reinforces the thesis that the network continues to operate as a 'high-value network' where blockspace is priced by the economic value of the activity it supports.

Solana (SOL), by contrast, posted only a modest 0.18% increase over the same window, with analysts pointing to 'stagnant throughput monetization' as a limiting factor. While Solana’s architecture is optimized for high-speed, low-cost execution and can process large volumes of transactions, critics argue the network’s revenue capture is structurally weaker—fees are comparatively thin and value accrual is more concentrated around validators rather than consistently flowing to long-term token holders.

That imbalance has been visible in Solana’s historical fee profile. During prior meme-coin cycles, annualized fees reportedly reached as high as $2.8 billion, only to fall sharply afterward—by as much as 79%—illustrating how quickly fee revenue can evaporate when traffic is primarily speculative and cyclical.

On a 30-day basis, the revenue gap also appears pronounced. Estimates cited by market participants put total fees at about $320.35 million for Ethereum versus $186.13 million for Solana—roughly a 72% advantage for Ethereum. Average daily fees were estimated near $10.7 million for Ethereum compared with about $6.2 million for Solana. Beyond raw totals, the networks’ value capture differs by design: Ethereum pairs fee burning with staking economics, while Solana’s distribution is more validator-centric, shaping how economic value accumulates across each ecosystem.

The divergence looks less like a one-off spike and more like an emerging structural trend. Over a 7-day cumulative window, figures referenced by analysts showed Ethereum at roughly $58.11 million in fees versus Solana at $34.78 million—maintaining a similar gap of about 67% even after smoothing out daily volatility.

One of the more counterintuitive dynamics supporting Ethereum’s revenue resilience is what some observers call the 'L2 scaling paradox'. Even as average fees per transaction have fallen toward the $0.01 range, total revenue has increased. The logic is economic: lower per-transaction costs can attract more institutional-grade settlement flows, expanding total payment volume and allowing the network to earn more in aggregate through 'scale effects'. In this framing, L2s such as Base and Arbitrum are not simply diluting fee capture; they are broadening the market, while still generating indirect value for Ethereum’s core settlement layer.

Solana’s challenge, analysts argue, is the mirror image. Transaction counts may remain high, but the unit economics are so compressed that network-wide revenue does not scale proportionally. The chain sustains a 'high-volume' model, yet its 'revenue density' per unit of activity remains comparatively low.

Overall, the episode adds weight to a market narrative that the competition among smart-contract platforms is shifting away from headline TPS metrics and toward which network can consistently process more economically meaningful transactions. Ethereum’s rising share of RWA and stablecoin settlement flows is increasingly viewed as a durable fee driver, while Solana is still broadly associated with traffic-led cycles. If these patterns persist, analysts say the long-run valuation gap between ecosystems may increasingly track differences in fee structure and revenue durability—because revenue remains one of the most direct indicators of sustainable network demand.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

🔎 Market Interpretation

Ethereum fee shock was usage-driven, not price-driven: ETH fell ~2.69% while network fees jumped ~36%, implying congestion from transaction timing and composition rather than speculative price momentum.

Blockspace tightened due to institutional-style batching: RWA settlements and stablecoin (USDC) flows clustered into narrow cutoffs, creating intraday congestion and a meaningful lift in fee revenue.

“High-value” settlement demand looks stickier: The article frames the fee increase as tied to recurring clearing/settlement workflows (RWA + stablecoins), which are typically more durable than meme-coin or retail bursts.

Ethereum vs Solana monetization divergence: Solana saw only ~0.18% fee increase and is described as facing weaker throughput monetization—high activity, but thin fee capture and value accrual skewed toward validators.

Revenue gap appears structural, not anecdotal: Cited estimates show ETH leading in fees over 30D ($320.35M vs $186.13M) and 7D ($58.11M vs $34.78M), maintaining ~67–72% advantage across windows.

Market narrative shift: Competition is increasingly framed around “economically meaningful transactions” and durable fee structures, not headline TPS.

💡 Strategic Points

Watch RWA + stablecoin settlement calendars: If settlement windows are driving congestion, fee/revenue spikes may correlate with institutional batch cutoffs rather than crypto-native trading cycles.

Circle/USDC rails as a demand multiplier: Circle’s Arc L1 initiative is portrayed as a settlement rail that can pull institutional flows onchain; increased USDC RWA settlement on Ethereum L2s may keep demand elevated.

“Real yield” framing strengthens ETH’s value proposition: Revenue linked to payments/settlement is positioned as closer to sustainable network demand than revenue tied to speculative mania.

L2 scaling paradox supports aggregate revenue: Even if per-tx fees fall toward ~$0.01, total revenue can rise if lower costs expand total settlement volume (scale effects) and preserve Ethereum’s role as final settlement.

Solana’s monetization risk: A high-volume/low-fee model may struggle to translate usage into durable network-wide revenue; past meme cycles showed fees can expand rapidly then decay sharply (reported up to ~$2.8B annualized, then -79%).

Valuation implication: If durable fee drivers persist (RWA, stablecoins, institutional settlement), analysts expect ecosystem valuation gaps to track revenue durability and fee-structure design (burning + staking vs validator-centric distribution).

📘 Glossary

Network fees (gas): Payments users make to include transactions in blocks; rise when blockspace demand exceeds supply.

Blockspace: The limited capacity of a blockchain to process transactions per block; scarcity can drive fee spikes.

RWA (Real-World Assets): Tokenized representations of offchain assets (e.g., U.S. Treasuries, T-bills, commodities) settled onchain.

Stablecoin flows: Transfers of price-pegged tokens (e.g., USDC) often used for payments, settlement, and treasury operations.

USDC: USD Coin, a dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by Circle, widely used for onchain settlement.

Circle Arc / Arc L1: Referenced as a Circle-linked initiative framed as a payments/settlement rail to onboard institutional activity onchain.

L1 (Layer 1): The base blockchain (e.g., Ethereum mainnet) that provides core security and settlement.

L2 (Layer 2): Scaling networks (e.g., Base, Arbitrum) that execute transactions off L1 and post proofs/data to L1, reducing per-tx costs.

Fee burning: Mechanism (notably on Ethereum via EIP-1559) where part of fees are destroyed, affecting supply dynamics.

Staking economics: Rewards and incentives for securing a network by locking tokens; interacts with fee/revenue distribution.

Throughput monetization: How effectively a chain converts transaction volume (TPS) into revenue captured by the protocol/ecosystem.

Revenue density: Revenue generated per unit of activity; higher density implies more economically meaningful usage per transaction.

Real yield (contextual): Fee revenue viewed as stemming from fundamental economic activity (payments/settlement) rather than transient speculation.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Bitcoin (BTC) enters the final week of March trading near $67,400, facing a dense slate of US economic releases that could determine whether the pioneer crypto breaks out of its two-month consolidation or slides deeper into bearish territory.

The six reports span labor demand, consumer health, and Federal Reserve guidance. Each one feeds directly into rate-cut expectations that have become the primary macro driver for crypto markets in 2026.

Powell Sets the Tone as Bitcoin ConsolidatesFederal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speaks Monday at 10:30 a.m. ET in what markets have flagged as a high-impact event.

🚨 Powell Speaks Monday 10:30 AM ET

Fed Chair Jerome Powell will deliver remarks at Harvard (moderated discussion) on 30 March.

Not an official "emergency" speech, but markets will watch closely amid:
• #IranWar oil price spike
• Russia gasoline export ban starting April 1… pic.twitter.com/yzzsWZYEqf

— InspireAndInform (@vikasg25091995) March 28, 2026 No specific topic has been pre-announced, but traders will parse every sentence for clues on whether the Fed sees room to cut rates later this year.

The backdrop is tense. The Fed held rates steady at 3.50%-3.75% at its March 17-18 meeting, while its updated dot plot projected only one cut for 2026.

Powell acknowledged progress on inflation had been slower than hoped and flagged sticky services prices as a persistent concern.

Dovish language from Powell, particularly anything suggesting the labor market has cooled enough to justify earlier easing, could trigger a relief rally.

Hawkish commentary would likely strengthen the dollar and push Treasury yields higher, compressing risk appetite for crypto.

Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCryptoBitcoin has traded between roughly $65,000 and $76,000 throughout March after a sharp retracement from its $126,000 all-time high set in late 2025.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $1.47 billion in inflows over seven consecutive days in early March, but outflows returned after the FOMC meeting.

The CME FedWatch Tool now shows a 96% probability of no rate change at the April meeting, with rate-hike odds rising in tandem.

Fed Interest Rate Cut Probabilities. Source: CME FedWatch ToolThat positioning leaves Bitcoin highly sensitive to any shift in Fed rhetoric on Monday morning.

Tuesday’s Dual Release Tests Labor Demand and Consumer ConfidenceTwo reports land simultaneously at 10:00 a.m. ET on Tuesday.

JOLTS Job Openings The February JOLTS Job Openings data will show whether labor demand continued its months-long decline. Consensus points to approximately 7 million openings, slightly above January’s 6.95 million reading.

US Economic Calendar This Week. Source: MarketWatch JOLTS matters for Bitcoin because it is one of the Fed’s preferred gauges of labor-market tightness. Falling openings suggest employers are pulling back on hiring, which eases wage pressure and strengthens the case for rate cuts.

A reading below 7 million would reinforce the cooling trend that began in mid-2025 and could lift rate-cut bets, a historically supportive signal for BTC.

Consumer Confidence The March Consumer Confidence Index from the Conference Board arrives alongside JOLTS. Forecasts sit near 88.0, down from 91.2 previously.

Consumer spending accounts for roughly 70% of US GDP, and a sharp drop in confidence often signals areduced willingness to spend.

For crypto markets, a weaker-than-expected confidence print paired with soft JOLTS data would build a dovish narrative heading into Wednesday. That combination has previously supported risk assets by pulling forward rate-cut expectations.

Wednesday’s Rehearsal for the Jobs ReportTwo releases on Wednesday will function as a preview of Friday’s main event.

ADP Nonfarm Employment report The March ADP Nonfarm Employment report arrives at 8:15 a.m. ET, with consensus near 63,000 private-sector jobs added.

ADP data has diverged from official Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) figures in recent months, but large surprises still move markets.

Retail Sales Report At 8:30 a.m. ET, the delayed February retail sales report drops. Consensus expects a 0.4% month-over-month gain after January’s 0.2% decline.

This is the most direct read on consumer spending and will reveal whether households maintained purchasing power despite rising oil prices and softening sentiment.

A miss on both ADP and retail sales would heighten recession concerns and likely push Bitcoin toward $68,000-$70,000 on renewed rate-cut bets.

A beat on both would support the “resilient economy” narrative, potentially lifting Treasury yields and the dollar while pressuring BTC.

The dynamic cuts both ways for Bitcoin. Weak data supports easier monetary policy, which increases liquidity expectations. But if weakness tips into outright recession fear, the sell-off in risk assets could drag crypto down alongside equities.

The March Jobs Report Arrives on a Closed MarketFriday’s BLS Employment Situation report is the week’s marquee event. It arrives at 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday.

It will come amid Good Friday hype, creating an unusual setup where futures markets could react but cash equity trading may not resume until Monday.

The FactSet consensus calls for +45,000 nonfarm payrolls (NFP), a modest rebound from February’s -92,000 shock.

Unemployment is expected to tick up to 4.5% from 4.4%, while average hourly earnings are forecast at 0.3% month-over-month and 3.8% year-over-year.

February’s report was the weakest since December 2020. Healthcare lost 28,000 jobs due to ongoing strike activity, federal government payrolls fell by 10,000, and prior months were revised sharply lower. That print rattled both equities and crypto, with BTC falling toward $70,000 before stabilizing.

A rebound toward +50,000-60,000 would be interpreted as stabilization rather than recovery, given the pre-tariff monthly average was approximately 180,000 jobs. That outcome would likely keep rate expectations roughly unchanged and leave Bitcoin range-bound.

The tail risks are what matter. A negative print, another month of job losses, would fuel recession bets and could push BTC toward $62,000-$63,000 despite rate-cut tailwinds.

A strong beat above +100,000, particularly with rising wages, would revive “higher for longer” fears and pressure crypto alongside a stronger dollar.

Hyperliquid’s validators cluster in AWS Tokyo alongside Binance, BitMEX and KuCoin, giving nearby traders a latency advantage, Glassnode data shows Mar 30, 2026, 5:09 a.m.

Hyperliquid is decentralized, but geography still matters, as new research by Glassnode shows traders closer to its infrastructure have a clear speed advantage.

Trades from Tokyo-based users can reach the protocol’s validators in as little as 2 to 3 milliseconds. That’s far better latency than European users, who face delays exceeding 200 milliseconds.

That's because Hyperliquid's 24 validators are clustered in Tokyo, deployed across multiple availability zones in Amazon Web Services' ap-northeast-1 region. The API layer routes through AWS CloudFront, but the validators sit in a single Japanese cloud region.

This shows that while decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid preserve core principles of open access, transparency, and the absence of centralized oversight to remove control asymmetries, speed and execution asymmetries still exist. So, while the market remains structurally fair and permissionless, traders with better proximity to infrastructure can still have an edge, highlighting an inherent tension between decentralization and equal participation in practice.

(Glassnode)In a time-ordered system, geography determines queue priority. A trading desk in Tokyo can reach the matching layer hundreds of milliseconds ahead of competitors in Hong Kong, Singapore, or the U.S., securing a better position, tighter spreads, and higher fill probability.

Hyperlatency's order-to-fill measurements put numbers on the gap. From AWS Tokyo, the median round-trip to place and confirm an order is 884 milliseconds, of which roughly 879 milliseconds is server-side processing and just 5 milliseconds is network transit.

From Ashburn, Virginia, the total rises to roughly 1,079 milliseconds. The edge is about 200 milliseconds on a one-second fill, a margin that compounds across an exchange regularly handling more than $4 billion in daily perpetuals volume.

This research, however, isn't without its critics. One person on X pointed out that more complicated order instructions submitted from the Tokyo region can hit a roundtrip latency time of 400ms.

Tokyo's role as crypto's infrastructure capital is not new. Centralized exchanges have clustered deployments around the city's AWS region for years, drawn first by proximity to Asian trading flow and then by a regulatory framework Japan built after the collapse of Mt. Gox.

At Token2049 in Singapore last year, crypto executives described Tokyo as the center of gravity for digital asset infrastructure in Asia.

"Japan had no regulation for a long time, don't forget, that's where crypto basically happened, and then it went super stringent, and nothing happened for a long time," Konstantin Richter, the CEO of Blockdaemon, told CoinDesk during Token2049. "But people kept on chiming away, and now they actually have a regulatory infrastructure that's institutionally scalable and about ready to pop."

Richter said his company's clients in Japan are willing to pay for institutional-grade infrastructure.

BitMEX CEO Stephan Lutz put it more directly. "We were in Ireland before … but it became more and more difficult because basically everyone except the U.S. players are in the Tokyo data centers," he said.

The switch boosted liquidity by roughly 180% in BitMEX's main contracts and up to 400% in some altcoin markets, gains Lutz attributed to the latency reduction from being in Tokyo, not market-maker recruitment.

AWS Tokyo: crypto's MahwahHyperliquid is not unique in this regard. Binance and KuCoin also run significant infrastructure on AWS ap-northeast-1.

An April 2025 AWS outage caused service degradation across multiple platforms, underscoring how much of crypto's plumbing runs through a single cloud region and Amazon itself (data shows that around 36% of all Ethereum nodes are powered by AWS).

In traditional finance, exchanges neutralize this kind of geographic advantage by design.

NYSE uses optical backscatter reflectometry in its Mahwah data center to equalize cable lengths to the nanosecond.

Deutsche Börse normalizes cross-connects to within 2.5 nanoseconds. IEX routes every order through a 350-microsecond speed bump, 38 miles of coiled fiber, to eliminate proximity advantage.

Europe's MiFID II mandates clock synchronization to 100 microseconds and externally audited cable-length equalization. Those safeguards took decades to develop. Nothing equivalent exists in decentralized markets.

For now, crypto traders appear comfortable with that asymmetry. Hyperliquid has seen sustained growth despite its centralized infrastructure concentration. But as processing times compress and institutional capital enters DeFi, the dynamics are clear: speed determines position, and position determines liquidity.

The latency arms race that reshaped Wall Street is arriving in decentralized finance. It runs through Tokyo.

More For You

As stablecoins evolve into core financial infrastructure, North America leads. This report maps the regulation, market shifts, and players driving adoption.

Why it matters:

Stablecoins are entering their third phase of evolution - the institutionalization era - becoming increasingly embedded into core financial infrastructure. As institutions prioritize transparency and compliance, regulated issuers like USDC, RLUSD, and PYUSD are steadily gaining share with RLUSD surpassing $1B in market cap within its first year. North America, leading in regulatory frameworks and institutional distribution, is at the center of it all.

More For You

The company seemed to have skipped its weekly bitcoin purchase announcement for the first time since late December.

What to know:

Strategy appeared to make no bitcoin purchases last week, after a run of 13 consecutive weekly buys.MSTR is down about 77% from its peak in November 2024.

Solana (SOL) is attempting to hold the key $82 support zone, but analysts warn that weakening demand and persistent supply pressure could open the door to a deeper pullback toward the $50–$58 range—levels that would imply roughly another 40% downside from current prices.

As of Monday 10:00 a.m. in Seoul (Monday 1:00 a.m. UTC), SOL traded at $82.22, down 0.15% over 24 hours and 4.69% over the past week. Daily trading volume stood at about $2.55 billion, while Solana’s market capitalization was roughly $47.07 billion, giving it about 2.05% of total crypto market value.

Market watchers point to a broader risk-off tone across digital assets and a fading bid for SOL after a sharp rejection near $250. While Solana recently traded between $77.14 and $85.66 and previously managed to close higher on the day, analysts say the recovery has not yet translated into sustained spot demand—leaving the $82 area vulnerable if sellers regain control.

Technically, the $50–$58 band is being flagged as a potential next major support cluster should current weakness extend. Traders note that downside scenarios can become self-reinforcing when ‘support defense’ fails: stop-losses trigger, leveraged positions unwind, and spot liquidity thins—all of which can amplify short-term volatility.

Within the investment product ecosystem, holders of the 21Shares Solana ETF (TSOL) are set to receive staking rewards of $0.016962 per share as of March 30, reflecting a structure that passes through network participation yield to investors. While staking returns can cushion holding costs, they typically do not offset large directional moves during drawdowns.

Despite the price pressure, Solana continues to post strong ‘fundamental activity’ metrics. The network is cited as leading in cumulative unique developers, with 10,864—above Ethereum (ETH) at 9,017 and Polkadot (DOT) at 8,995—underscoring continued builder interest in Solana’s high-throughput design and comparatively low transaction costs. Solana is also reported to process more than 3,000 transactions per second on a sustained basis, a performance profile often highlighted for consumer-scale decentralized applications.

Supply figures cited in local market data show circulating supply around 572.49 million SOL and total supply about 623.32 million, with an additional self-reported circulating figure of 525.23 million. Discrepancies between supply datasets can reflect differences in methodology—such as how locked tokens or custodial balances are treated—something traders monitor closely when assessing dilution risk and market capitalization comparisons.

Sentiment indicators remain mixed. Prediction-market pricing suggests roughly even odds—around 50%—of a short-term rebound, but there is no clear consensus on medium-term direction. Recent performance also illustrates the push-pull: SOL was up 1.18% over the past hour and slightly higher over 30 days (+0.19%), yet it remains sharply lower over 60 days (-34.14%) and 90 days (-33.08%).

Market microstructure data shows activity remains overwhelmingly concentrated on centralized exchanges, with CEX volume around $2.55 billion versus only about $35,456 on DEX venues in the cited snapshot. That imbalance can matter during fast moves, as centralized venue order books often set the reference price and can accelerate swings when liquidity shifts.

For now, Solana’s near-term outlook hinges on whether buyers can maintain the $82 region amid cooldown in demand. Longer term, continued developer momentum and network performance are frequently cited as potential foundations for recovery. However, in the current tape, traders are weighing those fundamentals against ‘fear-driven’ selling and the possibility that the market tests lower support zones before any durable rebound takes shape.

Article Summary by TokenPost.ai

🔎 Market Interpretation

Key level in focus: SOL is trying to hold the $82 support zone; failure could shift control back to sellers.

Downside roadmap: Analysts flag $50–$58 as the next major support cluster, implying ~40% additional downside from the ~$82 area if the current floor breaks.

Demand vs. supply imbalance: The bounce attempts have not translated into sustained spot demand, while supply pressure persists after a prior rejection near $250.

Risk-off backdrop: Broader market tone is described as cautious, reinforcing sensitivity to support breaks and liquidity pulls.

Microstructure watch: Trading is heavily concentrated on CEXs (~$2.55B) versus minimal DEX activity (~$35k in the cited snapshot), meaning centralized order books likely dominate price discovery during fast moves.

Sentiment mixed: Prediction-market odds show ~50/50 for a near-term rebound, with no strong medium-term consensus; performance is flat-to-slightly-up near-term but sharply down over 60–90 days.

💡 Strategic Points

Support-defense failure risk: If $82 breaks, downside can accelerate via stop-loss triggering, leveraged liquidations, and thinning spot liquidity—a self-reinforcing volatility loop.

Scenario framing:

Bull case (near-term): Hold above $82 and rebuild spot bids; range stability could reduce liquidation risk.

Bear case (near-term): Lose $82 → market likely targets the $50–$58 support band, where buyers may attempt a more structural defense.

Staking yield is not a hedge: 21Shares Solana ETF (TSOL) distributes staking rewards ($0.016962/share as of Mar 30), which can reduce carry costs but typically cannot offset large drawdowns.

Fundamentals vs. tape: Network strength (developer count, throughput, low fees) may underpin longer-term recovery, but price action is currently driven by liquidity and sentiment more than fundamentals.

Supply-data diligence: Reported circulating figures differ (e.g., ~572.49M vs. self-reported ~525.23M). Traders may treat supply methodology (locked/custodial/escrow treatment) as an input to dilution risk and market-cap comparisons.

Positioning implication: Given CEX-led price discovery, periods of rapid moves may bring wider spreads and slippage; risk controls (sizing, stops, leverage limits) are emphasized when key supports are tested.

📘 Glossary

Support zone: A price area where buying interest historically appears, potentially slowing or stopping declines.

Spot demand: Direct buying of the underlying asset (SOL) rather than derivatives; often viewed as more durable than leverage-driven demand.

Supply pressure: Net selling or excess available tokens that weigh on price, especially when demand weakens.

Stop-loss: An order that sells (or buys back) when price hits a set level, often accelerating moves when clustered.

Leveraged unwind / liquidation: Forced closing of margined positions when collateral falls below requirements, which can intensify volatility.

Liquidity: How easily an asset can be traded without moving its price significantly; thin liquidity can cause sharper swings.

CEX vs. DEX: Centralized exchanges (order-book venues) vs. decentralized exchanges (on-chain trading); differences affect price discovery and execution.

Staking rewards: Yield earned for participating in network validation/security; in some products (e.g., TSOL), rewards are passed through to holders.

Transactions per second (TPS): A throughput metric indicating how many transactions a network can process; used to compare scalability.

Circulating vs. total supply: Circulating is tokens considered available to the market; total includes all minted tokens (including locked/held reserves depending on methodology).

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

Bittensor (TAO), the decentralized AI network token, has staged a dramatic recovery from its February lows, and on-chain data suggests the rally may have real legs.

CryptoQuant data tracking 90-day Spot Taker Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD), a metric measuring the balance between aggressive buyers and sellers on spot exchanges, shows a sustained flip toward buy-side dominance since the $154 floor.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The chart reveals weeks of consistent green bars replacing what had been months of sell-dominant red, indicating that real spot buyers have been steadily absorbing supply.

The token is now trading around $330. Its price rose more than 20% over the past week alone, and its market capitalization has climbed back to approximately $3.17 billion. 

Bittensor (TAO) Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto MarketsThe broader Bittensor ecosystem has also benefited. According to CoinGecko data, the total market capitalization of subnet tokens has collectively surged to $1.4 billion. Nearly every token in the network has posted double-digit gains over the past 30 days. 

Meanwhile, the percentage of TAO staked to subnets relative to total TAO staked has exceeded 33%, reflecting growing confidence in the subnet economy.

TAO Staked To Subnets. Source: ArtemisDespite the bullish backdrop, CryptoQuant analyst Maartunn noted that all segments of Bittensor trading activity, including spot volumes, futures volume, and retail participation, are heating up simultaneously.

“When everything heats up at once… risk increases,” he wrote.

The observation does not necessarily predict an imminent reversal. Nonetheless, it suggests the current rally may be in a zone where downside risk increases.

The conflict's fifth week brought its widest expansion yet, with Iran-backed forces opening a new front and U.S. ground troops arriving in the region. Mar 30, 2026, 5:27 a.m.

The war just got bigger. Bitcoin briefly got smaller.

Bitcoin dipped to $65,112 early Monday morning, its lowest level since the February crash, before recovering to $67,402 as Asian markets opened.

The 24-hour range of $65,112 to $67,389 reflects a market that sold hard on overnight escalation headlines and found buyers near $65,000, a level that hasn't been tested since the war's opening weekend five weeks ago.

Ethereum recovered 2% to $2,044, Solana gained 0.9% to $83.48, and XRP added 1.4% to $1.35. The 24-hour green across the board masks a rougher weekly picture though. BTC is still down 1% on the week, ETH 0.9%, XRP 1.9%, and SOL 3.7%. Tron is the one name sitting in green, up 2.6% in a day and 4.6% on the week, quietly outperforming the entire majors complex.

The escalation this time came from multiple directions simultaneously. Iran-backed Houthi forces entered the conflict, opening a new front beyond the direct U.S.-Israel-Iran theater. Additional U.S. troops arrived in the Middle East, fanning fears of a ground operation.

The Wall Street Journal reported Trump is weighing a military operation to extract uranium from Iran, though no decision has been made. And Iran attacked two aluminum production sites in the region, sending the metal up as much as 6% and extending the war's economic damage beyond oil and into industrial commodities.

Brent crude rose 2.5% to around $115 a barrel, now up roughly 90% year-to-date. Asian equities fell sharply, with South Korea's benchmark down 3.2% on a technology stock selloff and Japan's Nikkei dropping 3.4%. S&P 500 futures pared losses and were trading roughly flat, suggesting some stabilization after the initial reaction.

The $65,112 low matters technically. That level is within range of the $64,000 low from Feb. 28, the day the war started. Bitcoin has spent five weeks building a pattern of higher lows on each escalation, from $64,000 to $66,000 to $68,000 to $69,400 to $70,596.

Monday's dip below $66,000 is the first time in weeks the floor has moved lower rather than higher. Whether it recovers and re-establishes the uptrend or marks the beginning of a break below the range that has held since the war began is the question for the rest of the day.

Meanwhile, oil at $115 and aluminum spiking on direct attacks on production facilities means the inflationary impact is broadening beyond energy into industrial supply chains. That makes the Fed's position even harder and the rate cut timeline even more distant.

More For You

As stablecoins evolve into core financial infrastructure, North America leads. This report maps the regulation, market shifts, and players driving adoption.

Why it matters:

Stablecoins are entering their third phase of evolution - the institutionalization era - becoming increasingly embedded into core financial infrastructure. As institutions prioritize transparency and compliance, regulated issuers like USDC, RLUSD, and PYUSD are steadily gaining share with RLUSD surpassing $1B in market cap within its first year. North America, leading in regulatory frameworks and institutional distribution, is at the center of it all.

More For You

Hyperliquid’s validators cluster in AWS Tokyo alongside Binance, BitMEX and KuCoin, giving nearby traders a latency advantage, Glassnode data shows

What to know:

Hyperliquid’s validator cluster in AWS’s Tokyo region gives traders located in or near Tokyo a latency advantage of roughly 200 milliseconds over U.S. and European participants, improving their queue position and fill quality.Major crypto exchanges including Hyperliquid, Binance and KuCoin increasingly concentrate critical infrastructure in AWS’s ap-northeast-1 region, making...

In brief Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $290 million last week, with Friday's $225.5 million exodus marking the heaviest single-day bleed. BlackRock's IBIT shed $201.5 million on Friday alone, the largest single-fund outflow of the week. Flows turned negative as geopolitical tensions escalated and ceasefire expectations weakened. More than $290 million exited Bitcoin ETFs last week as a broad “risk-off” shift continues to grip global markets amid rising geopolitical and macro pressures.

Farside Investors' data shows cumulative weekly outflows of roughly $296 million between March 24 and March 27, led by heavy redemptions from BlackRock’s IBIT and other major funds. 

The sharpest single-day move came primarily from IBIT on Friday, with $225.5 million of total U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF outflows, capping a volatile week that began with strong inflows of $167.2 million on Monday before sentiment reversed.

“Risk-off is clearly the mood amongst markets," Josh Gilbert, market analyst at eToro, told Decrypt, pointing to Bitcoin's slide to a three-week low and the S&P 500's fifth consecutive weekly loss—its longest losing streak since 2022.

"The macro forces working against it are compounding," he said. "Triple-digit oil is fuelling inflation fears, which pushes rate cut expectations further out, which in turn removes the very catalyst that risk assets need to find a floor."

Geopolitical risk escalated Monday after President Donald Trump told the Financial Times he could "take the oil in Iran" and potentially seize Kharg Island, the country's major fuel hub.

 Gilbert said a ceasefire could spark a “strong relief rally,” but warned that, without credible de-escalation, markets will remain defensive with “more choppy sessions ahead.”

Peter Chung, head of research at Presto Labs, told Decrypt the “risk-off” tone was the primary driver, though he noted last week's outflow “doesn't seem that dramatic compared to the recent trends."

"I think what drove it was the general risk-off trend as the expectation for the ceasefire waned as the peace talks faltered towards the end of the week,” he added.

Pratik Kala, head of research at Apollo Crypto, echoed that read, attributing the outflows to "risk-off sentiment and end of quarter rebalancing," while telling Decrypt the $290 million figure is "quite normal." 

He added how Bitcoin's relative strength against other asset classes remains "notable and very supportive"—and cautioned against reading structural significance into weekly flow data. 

"ETF inflows/outflows are not only directional funds—there is a lot of basis trading done by hedge funds," Kala said. "Therefore, there are no hard limits or thresholds that would signal a structural change."

Gilbert noted Bitcoin had held up relatively well through the conflict and had been "a surprising standout despite its risk status as an asset," but warned that ongoing tensions show it is "in no way immune to this indiscriminate sell-off."

He noted the market is increasingly pricing in a Fed rate hike, "a far cry from the multiple cuts the market was pricing in just months ago,” and flagged Fed Chair Jerome Powell's scheduled remarks as a potential further pressure point.

On Myriad, a prediction market owned by Decrypt's parent company Dastan, sentiment leans bearish, with users pricing a 56.8% likelihood of Bitcoin falling to $55,000 rather than climbing to $84,000.

Bitcoin is trading at $67,574, up 1.4% in the last 24 hours, after sliding into the $65,000 range earlier Monday, according to CoinGecko data.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

8.2K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

511 Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

This article is exclusive to Seeking Alpha. No duplication or reproduction of this article is allowed without the consent of Seeking Alpha and the author. This article should not be misconstrued as individual financial advice. Always conduct your own due diligence prior to investing.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - March 30, 2026) - Tsodilo Resources Ltd. (TSXV: TSD) (OTCQB: TSDRF) (FSE: TZO) ("Tsodilo" or the "Company") is pleased to announce a strategic collaboration with Battelle Memorial Institute ("Battelle") to apply artificial intelligence and advanced data analytics to its Critical Minerals (CM) and Rare Earth Elements (REE) exploration program in Botswana (See, Tsodilo Resources Ltd. - News Releases).

"Across the mining sector, AI is increasingly being adopted to deliver unbiased, data-driven targeting that integrates legacy and newly acquired datasets (including drilling, geophysics, and geochemistry) into a unified framework, alongside mineral-system models, enabling more confident classification, prioritization and prediction of high-probability drill targets while reducing exploration risk" commented James M. Bruchs, Tsodilo Chairman and CEO.

Under the collaboration, Battelle will develop a physics-informed, predictive AI model trained on Tsodilo's exploration datasets to identify and rank high-probability locations for critical mineral and rare earth element mineralization in skarn deposits. Skarns are contact metamorphic deposits formed where magmatic fluids interact with carbonate host rocks, creating geochemical environments highly favorable to rare earth and critical mineral concentration. The model is designed to reduce exploration risk and accelerating discovery, drawing on one of the most extensive databases in the sector: over 600 diamond core holes, more than 100,000 meters of recovered core, 30,000 assays, and a broad suite of geophysical datasets including magnetic, gravity, electromagnetic, and seismic surveys.

The program is designed around three core objectives:

Systematically characterize the geological, geochemical, geophysical, and mineralogical signatures of REE-enriched skarn systems within the target region, establishing scientifically grounded understanding of these systems.Leverage AI with interactive geologist-in-the-loop workflows to build spatial statistical models of CM/REE enrichment indicators that translate complex, multi-source data into actionable spatial intelligence.Deploy predictive model that quantifies the probability of CM/REE prospectivity as a function of multi-layered geoscience inputs at any given location, iteratively updated to enable more confident targeting decisions as new drilling results are received. The model will be designed to improve in predictive accuracy as new drilling results are incorporated, enabling geologists to prioritize higher-confidence targets and reduce exploration risk over time. As the program matures, Battelle and Tsodilo will explore opportunities to delineate and rank priority target corridors for resource expansion and step-out drilling, and to establish probability-based target ranking to quantify uncertainty and support exploration decision-making. This framework may also include downstream geometallurgical and processing considerations.

"Partnering with Battelle allows us to expand our knowledge of our current critical minerals and rare earth elements project and to potentially expand the known mineralization," commented James M. Bruchs, Tsodilo Chairman and CEO. "The Skarn project currently holds fifteen of the fifteen Rare Earth Elements and six non-REE minerals on the USGS 2025 critical mineral list. Our data is extensive and Battelle is uniquely equipped to extract, organize, and analyze our datasets. I am eagerly looking forward to the results. This collaboration supports our broader critical minerals and rare earth elements strategy."

"Battelle is pleased to bring our capabilities in artificial intelligence, data analytics, and advanced materials science to bear on one of the most data-rich critical minerals exploration programs we have encountered," said Mike Janus, Senior Vice President & General Manager, Battelle. "This work builds naturally on Battelle's long-standing leadership in geoscience, from subsurface characterization to environmental modeling, and reflects the kind of integrated, mission-driven science we are known for. As geoscience and critical minerals become a defining national security priority, Battelle's commitment to this challenge has never been stronger."

About Battelle Memorial Institute

Battelle Memorial Institute is a global leader in applied science and technology, with deep expertise spanning data analytics, artificial intelligence, materials characterization, and advanced processing technologies. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio since 1929, Battelle manages or co-manages seven U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories and serves clients across national security, energy, environmental, and life sciences sectors. Battelle's critical minerals practice brings together capabilities across the full value chain, from AI-driven exploration analytics and resource characterization to separation technologies and process optimization, supporting clients and government partners in securing domestic and allied supply chains for strategically important materials. For more information, visit www.battelle.org.

About Tsodilo Resources Limited

Tsodilo Resources Limited is an international mineral resource exploration company engaged in the search for economic metal deposits at its Gcwihaba Resources (Pty) Limited ("Gcwihaba") projects in Botswana. The Company has a 100% stake in its Gcwihaba project area consisting of five metal (base, precious, platinum group, and rare earth) prospecting licenses all located in the North-West District of Botswana.

QP Disclosure

Overall supervision of the Company's exploration program is the responsibility of Asele Maboshe, an Independent Consultant and a "Qualified Person" as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101"), who has reviewed and approved the technical information in this news release.

This press release may contain forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, which address activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements pertaining to the use of proceeds, the impact of strategic partnerships and statements that describe the Company's future plans, objectives or goals) are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to the Company. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward- looking statements, and even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on the Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, changes in equity markets, changes in general economic conditions, market volatility, political developments in Botswana and surrounding countries, changes to regulations affecting the Company's activities, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, exploration and development risks, the uncertainties involved in interpreting exploration results and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration business. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or results or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and, even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, uncertainties relating to availability and cost of funds, timing and content of work programs, results of exploration activities, interpretation of drilling results and other geological data, risks relating to variations in the diamond grade and kimberlite lithologies; variations in rates of recovery and breakage; estimates of grade and quality of diamonds, variations in diamond valuations and future diamond prices; the state of world diamond markets, reliability of mineral property titles, changes to regulations affecting the Company's activities, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required project approvals, operational and infrastructure risk and other risks involved in the diamond exploration and development business. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or results or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to their inherent uncertainty. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange ("TSXV") nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. This news release may contain assumptions, estimates, and other forward-looking statements regarding future events. Such forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and are subject to factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control, which may cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those currently anticipated in such statements.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290284

Source: Tsodilo Resources Limited

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 30, 2026) - Levi & Korsinsky notifies investors that it has commenced an investigation into Insulet Corporation ("Insulet Corporation") (NASDAQ: PODD) concerning potential violations of the federal securities laws.

During that same February 18 earnings call, McEvoy stated that "strong clinical evidence and real-world outcomes continue to earn prescriber and patient confidence" and described Omnipod 5 as the "favorite pump" for both type-1 and type-2 users in 2025. CFO Flavia Pease added that U.S. revenue growth was "above the high end of our guidance range, driven by continued demand for Omnipod 5 across type 1 and type 2 customers." At no point during the call did any executive reference a product-quality issue, a pending regulatory action, or an anticipated recall.

Only a few weeks later, the March 12 filing revealed a defect affecting Omnipod 5 Pods. The filing identified insulin leakage capable of causing diabetic ketoacidosis -- a serious medical emergency. The Company's February 18 statements about Omnipod reliability, patient confidence, and demand-driven growth had not referenced any of these issues.

If you suffered a loss on your Insulet Corporation securities and would like to explore a potential recovery under the federal securities laws, Learn More About the Investigation or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or call (212)363-7500 to speak to our team of experienced shareholder advocates.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212)363-7500
Fax: (212)363-7171

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290417

Source: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 30, 2026) - Levi & Korsinsky notifies investors that it has commenced an investigation into Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. ("Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.") (NASDAQ: ALDX) concerning potential violations of the federal securities laws.

Throughout 2024 and 2025, Aldeyra's made forward-looking statements regarding the development and regulatory prospects of reproxalap for the treatment of dry eye disease. Management described the NDA submission and review process in terms that conveyed optimism about the likelihood of FDA approval. The Company's August 19, 2025 8-K filing and subsequent public communications continued to present the reproxalap program as a central focus of its pipeline and a key driver of near-term commercial potential.

The FDA's Complete Response Letter on March 17, 2026 stated that reproxalap had not demonstrated sufficient efficacy. Prior to the CRL, the Company's public statements emphasized positive aspects of the drug's clinical data and regulatory prospects. Levi & Korsinsky is investigating whether Aldeyra failed to disclose material information about efficacy risks that would have altered the forward-looking picture presented to shareholders.

If you suffered a loss on your Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. securities and would like to explore a potential recovery under the federal securities laws, Learn More About the Investigation or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or call (212)363-7500 to speak to our team of experienced shareholder advocates.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004
[email protected]
Tel: (212)363-7500
Fax: (212)363-7171

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290419

Source: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Scan QR code to install app

Important DisclaimersFXEmpire is owned and operated by Empire Media Network LTD., Company Registration Number 514641786, registered at 7 Jabotinsky Road, Ramat Gan 5252007, Israel. The content provided on this website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and materials provided by third parties. This content is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be interpreted as, a recommendation or advice to take any action, including making any investment or purchasing any product. Before making any financial decision, you should conduct your own due diligence, exercise your own discretion, and consult with competent advisors. The content on this website is not personally directed to you, and we do not take into account your individual financial situation or needs. The information contained on this website is not necessarily provided in real time, nor is it guaranteed to be accurate. Prices displayed may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges. Any trading or other financial decision you make is entirely your own responsibility, and you must not rely solely on any information provided through the website. FXEmpire does not provide any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information contained on the website and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of using such information. The website may include advertisements and other promotional content. FXEmpire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with such content. FXEmpire does not endorse, recommend, or assume responsibility for the use of any third-party services or websites. Empire Media Network LTD., its employees, officers, subsidiaries, and affiliates shall not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided herein.Risk DisclaimersThis website contains information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs), and other financial instruments, as well as about brokers, exchanges, and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and involve a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. FX Empire encourages you to conduct your own research before making any investment decision and to avoid investing in any financial instrument unless you fully understand how it works and the risks involved.

The S&P 500 earnings yield (SP EY) jumped back over 5% on Friday, March 27, 2026 to end the week at 5.06%, the first time since early May '25 that the S&P 500 earnings yield has been over 5%. Therefore, finally, the S&P 500 could be said to be getting back to a more reasonable valuation. A 5% EY could imply for some a 20x P/E for the S&P 500 benchmark, which again is more reasonable than January's and February's P/E valuation levels.

2.6K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of GOOG, MSFT either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Eli Lilly and Company’s logo is displayed during a press conference in Houston, Texas, U.S., September 23, 2025. REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

March 30 (Reuters) - Eli Lilly (LLY.N), opens new tab wants the UK to regularly raise NHS drug prices ​and phase out a multi-billion-pound rebate scheme if ‌it is to resume investment, its international businesses president Patrik Jonsson told the Financial Times.

In an interview published on ​Monday, Jonsson said he was in talks with UK ministers and ​was "optimistic" about reaching an agreement by the ⁠summer for the country to pay more for ​its medicines.

Keep up with the latest medical breakthroughs and healthcare trends with the Reuters Health Rounds newsletter. Sign up here.

The discussions also cover "innovative" pricing plans that would link payments for ​anti-obesity drugs to whether patients become well-enough to return to work, Jonsson said.

Medicine prices in the UK had been "far too low for far too ​long, and even with the current threshold, we ​are not back to where we started more than 20 years ‌ago," he ⁠added.

"Everyone deserves access to the best and most innovative treatments, and our changes to medicine pricing will make sure thousands of NHS patients gain faster ​access to new ​treatments," the ⁠British Department of Health and Social Care said.

"We remain fully committed to delivering ​the UK-US Pharmaceutical Agreement, including the changes ​to ⁠the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold."

Lilly raised the UK list price of its weight-loss treatment Mounjaro by up to 170% ⁠in August ​2025, saying it had initially set ​prices "significantly below" those in its three other major European markets to prevent delays in NHS access.

Reporting ​by Chandni Shah in Bengaluru; Editing by Sumana Nandy

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of monday.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: MNDY) between September 17, 2025 and February 6, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 11, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased monday.com common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the monday.com class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55823 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 11, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of monday.com's revenue expansion outlook; notably decelerating growth, reduced expansion momentum and extended sales cycles. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the monday.com class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=55823 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290366

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

HomeETFs and Funds AnalysisETF Analysis

SummaryHYD is a muni bond ETF, investing in both high-yield and investment-grade muni bonds.It has a tax-advantaged 4.4% yield, which should provide above-average income to some investors in higher tax brackets.It seems broadly inferior to FLMI, another muni bond ETF, with higher-quality holdings and stronger performance.This idea was discussed in more depth with members of my private investing community, CEF/ETF Income Laboratory. Learn More » Tanja Ristic/E+ via Getty Images

I've written several articles on the VanEck High Yield Muni ETF (HYD) in the past. I've been bullish due to the fund's good tax-advantaged 4.4% dividend yield. HYD has slightly underperformed since the most recent

11.47K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces an investigation of potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Disc Medicine, Inc. (NASDAQ: IRON) resulting from allegations that Disc Medicine may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Disc Medicine securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=56641 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On February 13, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") issued a Complete Response Letter ("CRL") to Disc Medicine regarding its bitopertin program. The FDA stated they could not approve Disc Medicine's new drug application ("NDA") as there were uncertainties in the NDA that would need additional evidence.

On this news, Disc Medicine's stock price fell 22% on February 13, 2026.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290368

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLNO) between March 26, 2025 and November 4, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important May 5, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Soleno common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Soleno class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43959 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 5, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Soleno Phase 3 clinical trial program for diazoxide choline extended-release tablets ("DCCR") had systematically downplayed, misrepresented, and/or concealed significant evidence of safety concerns potentially related to the administration of DCCR, including issues related to excess fluid retention in clinical trial participants; (2) as a result, the administration of DCCR to treat hyperphagia in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome ("PWS") posed materially greater safety risks than disclosed by Soleno or its executives; and (3) as a result, DCCR had materially lower commercial viability and undisclosed risks related to the likelihood of significant and widespread adverse events after its commercial launch, including risks related to patient discontinuation rates, lower patient adoption, prescriber reluctance, adverse regulatory action, and potential reputational and legal fallout. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Soleno class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43959 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290408

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Paysafe Limited (NYSE: PSFE) between March 4, 2025 and November 12, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 7, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Paysafe securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 7, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Paysafe's ecommerce business had significant exposure to a single high risk client; (2) as a result, Paysafe's credit loss reserves and/or write-offs were understated; (3) Paysafe had an undisclosed issue with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, making its client services difficult to bank; (4) the foregoing issues were likely to have a material negative impact on Paysafe's revenue growth and overall revenue mix; (5) as a result, Paysafe was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025; and (6) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Paysafe's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/290364

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Increasing risks have sent this stock crashing, and I think now is the opportunity to buy.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of March 26, 2026. The video was published on March 28, 2026.

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends MongoDB and is short shares of MongoDB. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

Amid a broad stock market sell-off, this dividend stock has outperformed.

*Stock prices used were the afternoon prices of March 26, 2026. The video was published on March 28, 2026.

Parkev Tatevosian, CFA has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends eBay. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Parkev Tatevosian is an affiliate of The Motley Fool and may be compensated for promoting its services. If you choose to subscribe through his link, he will earn some extra money that supports his channel. His opinions remain his own and are unaffected by The Motley Fool.

Increasing geopolitical tensions are forcing governments to spend more on military development.