Market Signal Briefing

Published: February 9, 2026 │ 4:28 PM GMT

In a wide-ranging weekend update, Crypto Sensei argued that XRP coin is quietly being wired into the infrastructure of traditional finance, pointing to fresh regulatory moves, institutional research and new integrations across payments and derivatives.

CFTC’s No-Action Relief Reshapes Derivatives Collateral, Boosts RLUSDThe most concrete shift comes from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Sponsored

A newly discussed no-action letter ’26-05′ says the agency’s staff will not recommend enforcement against futures commission merchants (FCMs) that accept “payment stablecoins and other non-securities digital assets” as customer margin collateral, provided specific risk controls and haircuts are respected.

🇺🇸 New from the CFTC: Feb 6 2026

The Commission has updated its "No-Action" position on digital asset collateral.

The big change: National trust banks are now officially recognized as permitted issuers of payment stablecoins used for margin. 🏦 pic.twitter.com/YmDeQW9yfa

— 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸XRP (@BankXRP) February 8, 2026 The host of the XRP-focused podcast, Crypto Sensei notes that the update builds on an earlier letter (2540), effectively preserving and clarifying the ability for FCMs to treat qualifying digital assets as margin and residual interest.

One key change: national trust banks are now recognized as permitted issuers of payment stablecoins in this framework, broadening who can issue margin-eligible coins.

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin is presented as a direct beneficiary. It is already used as regulated dollar collateral at Bitnomial, a CFTC-regulated derivatives clearing organization that accepts both RLUSD and XRP as margin deposits.

Under the new framework, “any FCM that wants to accept a payment stablecoin for margin can do so under new clear rules,” the host says, positioning RLUSD as a cleaner option for derivatives collateral if issued through a qualifying national trust structure.

Institutional Thesis: Ripple As a Bank, XRP As Core Settlement AssetThe video leans heavily on a document from Amplify ETFs that sketches out a 2025–2026 institutional adoption roadmap.

According to the excerpt read on-screen, Ripple’s “conditional OCC approval for a national trust bank charter” is framed as a “landmark advancement” that could enable federally supervised custody, stablecoin management and payment services.

The document suggests that with federal charter status and potential Fedwire/FedNow access by mid-2026, Ripple could erode moats held by stablecoin issuers like Circle and Tether.

For XRP, Amplify argues this may mean “boosted institutional adoption,” reduced regulatory risk, and “indirect exposure to a compliant entity with banking privileges,” alongside possible scarcity effects via escrow.

The host underscores that XRP’s “built-in compliance and identity primitives” on the XRP Ledger differentiate it from chains that are trying to bolt on regulatory tooling after the fact, a point he says aligns with Ripple’s recently published institutional roadmap.

Infrastructure Build-Out: Dfns, Hyperliquid, Bitso & Global BanksOn the infrastructure side, custody and wallet platform Dfns has added the XRP Ledger as a “tier 1” network, with full wallet creation, transaction signing, policy controls and balance monitoring via API. That puts XRPL in the same internal category as Dfns’ highest-priority chains, aimed at exchanges, fintechs and banks.

The host also highlights an integration branded “Ripple Prime” with derivatives venue Hyperliquid, described as a major prime broker bridge between institutional capital and an on-chain perp protocol that already dominates its niche.

He argues that routing institutional flows through Ripple’s compliant stack could mechanically increase fee revenue and buybacks on the Hyperliquid side while deepening XRP’s role in collateral and settlement flows.

In payments, Latin American platform Bitso is said to be live using Ripple payments with XRP for liquidity and RLUSD for USD settlement, targeting US–LatAm transfers without pre-funded accounts. The host cites data that LatAm processed around 10% of remittances between the US and the region and handled roughly $82 billion in stablecoin payments in 2025.

Elsewhere, he points to a graphic of major payment and banking players — including Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Bank of America, Citi (via Metaco), Deutsche Bank and Chase — noting that several have public Ripple ties or indirect XRP connectivity through partners such as GTreasury.

Why This Matters For Crypto InvestorsDespite weak spot prices, Crypto Sensei notes that XRP recently ranked as the second most visited asset on CoinMarketCap, which he interprets as evidence of sustained retail interest.

He also cites a ranking that places Ripple among the world’s top 10 most valuable private companies with an estimated $50 billion valuation, alongside firms like SpaceX, OpenAI, Revolut and Stripe.

For crypto investors, the takeaway is less about short-term price moves and more about plumbing: CFTC clarity on non-security digital asset collateral, a maturing stablecoin framework that can fit RLUSD, and an expanding web of institutional integrations where XRP is used for liquidity, margin or settlement.

How much global volume ultimately runs through this stack — and how regulators classify each asset over time — remains the key variable.

Discover DailyCoin’s trending crypto scoops:
OMFIF Research Sets XLM & XRP As Top Matches For SWIFT
Bitcoin Crash Exposed: Analyst Points to TradFi Sell-Off

People Also Ask:Does the CFTC letter explicitly name XRP?

The host says the letter covers “payment stablecoins and other non-securities digital assets,” with Bitcoin and Ether cited as examples. XRP’s link is inferred via Bitnomial’s existing use of XRP as margin and its inclusion in the same non-security collateral bucket.

Is Ripple already operating as a national trust bank?

According to the Amplify ETFs document quoted in the video, Ripple has “conditional OCC approval” for Ripple National Trust Bank as of December 12, 2025. That framing implies a conditional status with further steps and timelines, not a fully operational national bank yet.

How is RLUSD different from other stablecoins in this context?

Crypto Sensei describes RLUSD as a regulated USD stablecoin already accepted as margin at a CFTC-regulated venue. The national trust bank angle and fit within the CFTC’s “payment stablecoin” framework are presented as its main differentiators.

Why does institutional wallet and custody support for XRPL matter?

Platforms like Dfns making XRPL a “tier 1” network lowers the friction for exchanges, banks and fintechs to hold and move XRP programmatically, which can be a prerequisite for using it as collateral, settlement or liquidity in regulated environments.

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

3 mins mins

Is Hyperliquid open interest below $5B? Unverified; evidence suggests higherClaims that Hyperliquid’s open interest (OI) has fallen below $5 billion remain unverified. Available coverage points to materially higher figures and emphasizes the risk of misreading snapshot or lagging data.

Based on reporting from PANews, citing analyst @ai_9684xtpa, Hyperliquid’s OI stood around $7.73 billion on December 12, 2025. Holder.io, summarizing a GLC study, noted OI fell from roughly $14.75 billion after the October 10, 2025 crash to about $9.48 billion, then rebounded ~45.6% since December 1 toward $9.5 billion.

The headline “continues to decline, now below $5B” conflicts with those figures and may stem from confusion between trading volume and OI, data staleness, or intraday troughs. Absent time-stamped, auditable evidence, the lower-$5B claim should be treated as unconfirmed.

What open interest is and why traders confuse itOpen interest measures outstanding contracts not yet closed or settled, unlike volume, which counts completed trades. OI can remain high even when volumes drop, particularly after volatile sessions that force risk reduction.

Data discrepancies often reflect different coverage scopes, collateral conventions, or delays. Some dashboards exclude certain markets or update less frequently, creating the impression that OI is lower than it is across the full venue.

Why this claim matters for risk and liquidityA materially lower OI would imply fewer active positions and potentially thinner liquidity on liquidation-heavy days, raising slippage and execution risk. Elevated OI, by contrast, can signal deeper books but more leverage-sensitive volatility.

Risk managers monitor OI alongside funding rates, basis, and realized volatility to calibrate margin and VaR. Misstating OI can distort hedging assumptions and lead to inappropriate sizing during fast-moving markets.

Context within the perpetual futures DEX landscapeHyperliquid’s OI remains central to its market position among decentralized perpetuals exchanges, even as rivals seek share. Coverage since late 2025 indicates resilience in OI despite sharp drawdowns and rotating flows.

Hyperliquid versus Aster: market signals from recent coverageAs reported by Cointelegraph, Aster’s open interest has shown sharp week-on-week gains, including an increase of about $1.25 billion during one observed period. Such bursts illustrate how liquidity can pivot across venues when incentives or narratives shift.

At the time of this writing, Coinbase Global (COIN) last closed near $165.12 on a day of double-digit gains, based on delayed NasdaqGS data. While not determinative for DEX perps, centralized exchange sentiment can correlate with derivatives risk appetite.

What CoinDesk coverage has emphasized about Hyperliquid’s positionAs reported by CoinDesk, analysis has underscored Hyperliquid’s durable footing among perp DEXs, even amid competitive pressure from newer entrants. “Hyperliquid is still best positioned among perp DEXs,” said Patrick Scott, a DeFi analyst at CoinDesk.

The coverage highlighted open interest, ecosystem development, and revenue as the pillars of that assessment. It also acknowledged share shifts, suggesting leadership can persist alongside rising competition.

FAQ about Hyperliquid open interestWhich sources provide reliable, real-time Hyperliquid open interest data?PANews and Holder.io have reported recent OI levels; CoinDesk provides analytical context. Exchange and on-chain dashboards may update faster but can differ in coverage.

Why do some dashboards show lower OI while others report $7-$9B?Methodology, product coverage, and update frequency vary. Some views exclude markets or use stale snapshots, while broader, timely datasets capture higher, aggregate open interest.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

The exchange has prepared two actions that will take effect on February 10.

The world’s largest crypto exchange will implement certain amendments to address ongoing market trends and enhance the trading experience for users.

Some of the cryptocurrencies included in the upcoming efforts are Ripple (XRP), Sui (SUI), Aster (ASTER), Internet Computer (ICP), and others.

The New Additions The company announced it will expand the list of trading pairs on Binance Spot by adding XRP/U, SUI/U, ASTER/U, and PAXG/U. The listing is scheduled for February 10, whereas trading bots services for the aforementioned pairs will become available on the same date.

U stands for United Stables – a stablecoin launched toward the end of 2025 and pegged to the US dollar. Binance revealed that all eligible users will enjoy zero maker fees on XRP/U, SUI/U, and ASTER/U “until further notice.” In addition, VIP clients will be offered zero-taker fees on those pairs.

The exchange informed that the new offerings will not be available to all users, noting that those residing in the USA, Canada, Iran, the Netherlands, and other countries will be excluded.

While backing from Binance may be price-positive for the included cryptocurrencies, such an effect is generally observed at initial listings rather than from the addition of extra trading pairs. In fact, XRP, SUI, and ASTER have headed south today (February 9), coinciding with the overall decline of the broader crypto market.

Goodbye to These Pairs Besides adding new offerings, Binance regularly monitors its service offerings and removes pairs that don’t meet the required criteria. Recently, it announced it will scrap 20 pairs, including BERA/BTC, ICP/ETH, KAITO/FDUSD, MANA/ETH, ZRO/BTC, and others.

You may also like: Ripple ETF Investors Unfazed by Market Crash as XRP Price Begins Recovery CZ’s ‘Poor Again’ Tweet Backfires as Nebraskangooner Slams Binance XRP Open Interest Hits Lowest Since November 2024: What This Means for Traders “The delisting of a spot trading pair does not affect the availability of the tokens on Binance Spot. Users can still trade the spot trading pair’s base and quote assets on other trading pair(s) that are available on Binance,” the company clarified.

The assets included in the delisting effort are in the red today, which is rather normal given the ongoing bearish condition of the market and the negative impact that such Binance moves can have.

It is important to note that a complete termination of all services for a particular token typically has a far more severe influence. In October last year, Binance delisted Flamingo (FLM), Kadena (KDA), and Perpetual Protocol (PERP), triggering double-digit declines. Prior to that, BakerySwap (BAKE), Hifi Finance (HIFI), and Self Chain (SLF) crashed hard due to the same reason.

Tags:

Bernstein analysts reiterated a bullish long-term outlook for bitcoin, calling the current bitcoin price downturn the “weakest bear case” in the asset’s history and maintaining a $150,000 price target by the end of 2026.

The research and brokerage firm argued that the recent drawdown reflects a crisis of confidence rather than structural damage to bitcoin’s network or investment thesis.

“What we are experiencing is the weakest bitcoin bear case in its history,” the analysts wrote, adding that none of the typical catalysts behind past crypto winters have emerged.

Bernstein said previous bear markets were driven by major failures, hidden leverage, or systemic breakdowns. This cycle, the firm sees no comparable blowups or widespread insolvencies.

Instead, analysts pointed to growing institutional alignment as a key difference. They cited support from a pro-bitcoin U.S. political environment, expanding adoption of spot BTC ETFs, rising corporate treasury participation, and continued involvement from large asset managers.

The firm argued that bitcoin’s broader adoption story remains intact despite market weakness.

Bernstein also addressed criticism that bitcoin has lagged gold during the latest period of macro volatility. They said BTC continues to trade primarily as a liquidity-sensitive risk asset rather than a mature safe haven.

They noted that elevated interest rates and tighter financial conditions have concentrated gains in select areas such as precious metals and AI-linked equities. 

Bernstein said BTC ETF infrastructure and corporate capital-raising channels remain positioned to absorb renewed liquidity if conditions ease.

Reporting from The Block helped with the coverage of this analysis.

Bernstein stays bullish on bitcoin; quantum fears dismissed. The analysts also pushed back against claims that BTC is losing relevance in an economy shaped by artificial intelligence.

They argued that blockchains and programmable wallets could play a central role in an emerging “agentic” digital environment, where autonomous software agents require global, machine-readable financial rails. Traditional banking systems, they said, remain constrained by closed APIs and legacy integration barriers.

On quantum computing, Bernstein acknowledged that future cryptographic threats warrant preparation but said BTC is not uniquely exposed. 

The firm argued that all critical digital systems face similar risks and will transition toward quantum-resistant standards together.

These thoughts echo that of Strategy, on Strategy’s fourth-quarter 2025 earnings call, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor said the company will launch a Bitcoin Security Program aimed at coordinating with the broader cyber and crypto community. 

The message echoed Strategy’s view that quantum computing is not an immediate threat, but a future engineering challenge that the network will have time to address.

Saylor framed quantum fears as the latest version of “FUD,” arguing that many major industries still rely on the same cryptographic foundations BTC uses today. He pointed to ongoing global investment in quantum-resistant research and said the Bitcoin ecosystem is already exploring upgrades that could strengthen the protocol if needed.

He emphasized that any major change would require broad global consensus, consistent with Bitcoin’s history of adapting through technical and regulatory pressure.

Bernstein added that BTC’s transparent codebase and the growing involvement of well-capitalized stakeholders position it to adapt alongside other financial and governmental systems.

Bernstein also dismissed concerns about leveraged corporate bitcoin accumulation and the risk of miner capitulation.

The analysts said major bitcoin-holding firms have structured liabilities to withstand prolonged downturns. 

They pointed to comments from Strategy executives that only an extreme scenario — BTC falling to $8,000 and remaining there for five years — would require balance sheet restructuring.

Bernstein maintained that the selloff represents sentiment weakness rather than systemic failure, and reiterated its forecast for bitcoin to reach $150,000 by the end of 2026.

At the time of writing, BTC is trading slightly below $70,000.

Micah Zimmerman

Micah first discovered Bitcoin in 2018 but remained a skeptic on the sidelines for too long. Since 2021, he has covered crypto and business and now works as a news reporter for Bitcoin Magazine, based in North Carolina.

Bitcoin price is hovering near the $70,000 mark in early February 2026, a strong drawdown from the late-January highs near $90K. The selloff was sharp, confidence faded quickly, and now the market is stuck watching one range obsessively and that is $60K to $65K. Lose that, and things could get messy fast in shortterm.

The damage along the way is already clear. Multiple support levels failed during the drop, forcing traders into a wait-and-see mode. Big bets are on pause. Everyone wants proof that a short-term bottom actually exists before stepping back in.

Fear Dominates as Structure Stays BearishNow is a time when every investor and trader wants a clear view, not a sugarcoating. To them sentiment has turned really ugly and a position without knowing the risk could create serious consequences.

Because, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index still remains deep in Extreme Fear territory. At the same time, spot Bitcoin ETFs continue to bleed capital, with weekly flow data showing persistent outflows stretching back from September 2025 and extending into early February. That’s not the backdrop of a confident market.

Zoom out on the Bitcoin price chart and the technical picture lines up with the mood. The 50-day EMA is still below the 200-day EMA, keeping the death cross active since mid-November. Adding to the pressure, a short-term death cross between the 20-day and 50-day EMAs printed in late January, confirming near-term weakness.

As a result, traders now treat the $60,000–$65,000 zone as the last meaningful cushion. A clean break there could invite forced selling rather than measured exits.

Short-term Indicators Hint at Relief, CautiouslyThat said, not everything is screaming collapse, at least not on the daily timeframe.

RSI on the daily chart is recovering from deeply oversold levels and currently sits near 32.5, suggesting selling pressure may be losing some intensity on daily timeframe chart. Meanwhile, MACD remains in a bearish cross, but the gap between signal lines is narrowing. In plain terms, downside momentum is slowing with recent bullish move in past few days.

CMF, however, is still negative at around –0.05. Until it flips above the zero line, money flow doesn’t support a sustained bounce. This keeps any Bitcoin price prediction in the “short-term relief only” category rather than any kind of trend reversal not even in the shortterm view.

Leverage Tells a More Dangerous StoryDerivatives data adds another layer of concern. As per Santiment data, the Open Interest has been falling seamleslly from 30 days high of 38 million OI to only 20 billion OI positions, while BTC price struggles, a sign that traders are exiting positions rather than committing fresh capital.

The brief funding spike on February 6 looked dramatic, but it functioned more like a short squeeze than genuine demand. Once funding flipped back to positive, the market became crowded with over-leveraged longs.

That’s the trap. Positive funding without rising participation leaves buyers exposed. Without new money entering, even a modest dip could trigger liquidations, dragging Bitcoin/USD back toward lower support.

For now or this month, Bitcoin price may attempt a bounce toward $74,750 or even $84,900 if buyers show up decisively. But until the 200-day EMA near $95,700 is reclaimed, the broader structure stays tilted firmly toward the bears.

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

BitMine (NYSE:BMNR) added 40,613 Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) in the past week, bringing total holdings to 4.326 million ETH worth $9.2 billion, as Executive Chairman Tom Lee predicts a “V-shaped recovery” for ETH. Lee's V-Shaped Recovery Thesis Lee pointed to Ethereum's strengthening fundamentals despite the 62% price crash from 2025 highs.

Ouster, Inc. (OUST) M&A Call February 9, 2026 8:00 AM EST

Company Participants

Chen Geng - Senior VP of Strategic Finance & Treasurer
Charles Pacala - Co-founder, CEO & Director
Cecile Schmollgruber - Co-Founder & CEO
Kenneth Gianella - Chief Financial Officer

Conference Call Participants

Colin Rusch - Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Research Division
Kevin Cassidy - Rosenblatt Securities Inc., Research Division
Richard Shannon - Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Hello, and welcome to today's call discussing Ouster's acquisition of StereoLabs. [Operator Instructions] The call today is being recorded, and a replay of the call will be available on the Ouster Investor Relations website an hour after the completion of this call. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Chen Geng, Senior Vice President of Strategic Finance and Treasurer. Please go ahead.

Chen Geng
Senior VP of Strategic Finance & Treasurer

Thank you, operator, and hello, everyone. Thank you for joining today's call. Today on the call, we have Ouster's Chief Executive Officer, Angus Pacala; and Chief Financial Officer, Ken Gianella, and Co-Founder of Stereo Labs, Cecile Schmollgruber. As a reminder, prior to the market opened today, Ouster issued a news release, which was also furnished on a Form 8-K and is posted in the Investor Relations section of the Ouster website. Today's conference call will be available for webcast replay in the Investor Relations section of our website.

I want to remind everyone that on this call, we will make certain forward-looking statements. These include all statements about the integration of StereoLabs, our competitive position, anticipated industry trends, our business and strategic priorities and the development and expansion of our products. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause actual results and trends to differ materially from those contained

Intuitive Machines ( NASDAQ:LUNR ) has been on quite the rocket ride lately, shooting up to a high of around $23.30 per share before dropping sharply to about $14.50 just a few days ago.

Avnet, Inc. (AVT - Free Report) reached a significant support level, and could be a good pick for investors from a technical perspective. Recently, AVT's 50-day simple moving average broke out above its 200-day moving average; this is known as a "golden cross."

There's a reason traders love a golden cross -- it's a technical chart pattern that can indicate a bullish breakout is on the horizon. This kind of crossover is formed when a stock's short-term moving average breaks above a longer-term moving average. Typically, a golden cross involves the 50-day and the 200-day moving averages, since bigger time periods tend to form stronger breakouts.

There are three stages to a golden cross. First, there must be a downtrend in a stock's price that eventually bottoms out. Then, the stock's shorter moving average crosses over its longer moving average, triggering a positive trend reversal. The third stage is when a stock continues the upward momentum to higher prices.

This kind of chart pattern is the opposite of a death cross, which is a technical event that suggests future bearish price movement.

Shares of AVT have been moving higher over the past four weeks, up 33.6%. Plus, the company is currently a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, suggesting that AVT could be poised for a breakout.

Looking at AVT's earnings expectations, investors will be even more convinced of the bullish uptrend. For the current quarter, there have been 2 changes higher compared to none lower over the past 60 days, and the Zacks Consensus Estimate has moved up as well.

Investors should think about putting AVTon their watchlist given the ultra-important technical indicator and positive move in earnings estimates.

The price trend for MongoDB (MDB - Free Report) has been bearish lately and the stock has lost 7.3% over the past week. However, the formation of a hammer chart pattern in its last trading session indicates that the stock could witness a trend reversal soon, as bulls might have gained significant control over the price to help it find support.

The formation of a hammer pattern is considered a technical indication of nearing a bottom with likely subsiding of selling pressure. But this is not the only factor that makes a bullish case for the stock. On the fundamental side, strong agreement among Wall Street analysts in raising earnings estimates for this database platform enhances its prospects of a trend reversal.

Understanding Hammer Chart and the Technique to Trade ItThis is one of the popular price patterns in candlestick charting. A minor difference between the opening and closing prices forms a small candle body, and a higher difference between the low of the day and the open or close forms a long lower wick (or vertical line). The length of the lower wick being at least twice the length of the real body, the candle resembles a 'hammer.'

In simple terms, during a downtrend, with bears having absolute control, a stock usually opens lower compared to the previous day's close, and again closes lower. On the day the hammer pattern is formed, maintaining the downtrend, the stock makes a new low. However, after eventually finding support at the low of the day, some amount of buying interest emerges, pushing the stock up to close the session near or slightly above its opening price.

When it occurs at the bottom of a downtrend, this pattern signals that the bears might have lost control over the price. And, the success of bulls in stopping the price from falling further indicates a potential trend reversal.

Hammer candles can occur on any timeframe -- such as one-minute, daily, weekly -- and are utilized by both short-term as well as long-term investors.

Like every technical indicator, the hammer chart pattern has its limitations. Particularly, as the strength of a hammer depends on its placement on the chart, it should always be used in conjunction with other bullish indicators.

Here's What Makes the Trend Reversal More Likely for MDBThere has been an upward trend in earnings estimate revisions for MDB lately, which can certainly be considered a bullish indicator on the fundamental side. That's because a positive trend in earnings estimate revisions usually translates into price appreciation in the near term.

Over the last 30 days, the consensus EPS estimate for the current year has increased 41.4%. What it means is that the sell-side analysts covering MDB are majorly in agreement that the company will report better earnings than they predicted earlier.

If this is not enough, you should note that MDB currently has a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), which means it is in the top 5% of more than 4,000 stocks that we rank based on trends in earnings estimate revisions and EPS surprises. And stocks carrying a Zacks Rank #1 or 2 usually outperform the market. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Moreover, a Zacks Rank of 1 for MongoDB is a more conclusive indication of a potential trend reversal, as the Zacks Rank has proven to be an excellent timing indicator that helps investors identify precisely when a company's prospects are beginning to improve.

Biohaven Ltd. (BHVN - Free Report) closed the last trading session at $11.6, gaining 4.4% over the past four weeks, but there could be plenty of upside left in the stock if short-term price targets set by Wall Street analysts are any guide. The mean price target of $21.13 indicates an 82.2% upside potential.

The average comprises 15 short-term price targets ranging from a low of $9.00 to a high of $50.00, with a standard deviation of $11.83. While the lowest estimate indicates a decline of 22.4% from the current price level, the most optimistic estimate points to a 331% upside. More than the range, one should note the standard deviation here, as it helps understand the variability of the estimates. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the agreement among analysts.

While the consensus price target is highly sought after by investors, the ability and unbiasedness of analysts in setting price targets have long been questionable. And investors making investment decisions solely based on this tool would arguably do themselves a disservice.

However, an impressive consensus price target is not the only factor that indicates a potential upside in BHVN. This view is strengthened by the agreement among analysts that the company will report better earnings than what they estimated earlier. Though a positive trend in earnings estimate revisions doesn't give any idea as to how much the stock could surge, it has proven effective in predicting an upside.

Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

Here's What You Should Know About Analysts' Price TargetsAccording to researchers at several universities across the globe, a price target is one of many pieces of information about a stock that misleads investors far more often than it guides. In fact, empirical research shows that price targets set by several analysts, irrespective of the extent of agreement, rarely indicate where the price of a stock could actually be heading.

While Wall Street analysts have deep knowledge of a company's fundamentals and the sensitivity of its business to economic and industry issues, many of them tend to set overly optimistic price targets. Are you wondering why?

They usually do that to drum up interest in shares of companies that their firms either have existing business relationships with or are looking to be associated with. In other words, business incentives of firms covering a stock often result in inflated price targets set by analysts.

However, a tight clustering of price targets, which is represented by a low standard deviation, indicates that analysts have a high degree of agreement about the direction and magnitude of a stock's price movement. While that doesn't necessarily mean the stock will hit the average price target, it could be a good starting point for further research aimed at identifying the potential fundamental driving forces.

That said, while investors should not entirely ignore price targets, making an investment decision solely based on them could lead to disappointing ROI. So, price targets should always be treated with a high degree of skepticism.

Here's Why There Could be Plenty of Upside Left in BHVNAnalysts' growing optimism over the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher, could be a legitimate reason to expect an upside in the stock. That's because empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 3.3% over the past month, as one estimate has gone higher compared to no negative revision.

Moreover, BHVN currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which means it is in the top 20% of more than 4,000 stocks that we rank based on four factors related to earnings estimates. Given an impressive externally-audited track record, this is a more conclusive indication of the stock's potential upside in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Therefore, while the consensus price target may not be a reliable indicator of how much BHVN could gain, the direction of price movement it implies does appear to be a good guide.

HomeStock IdeasLong IdeasFinancials 

SummaryPayPal is another beaten-down stock trading almost 90% below its all-time high of $310.16 reached in July 2021. Excessive optimism has now transformed itself into excessive pessimism.To highlight how negative market sentiment has become, PYPL is now trading at levels last seen in December 2016, and that is despite significant growth in the underlying business.Despite growing its revenue by ~210% and operating income by ~280% over the last 9 years, PayPal's stock went nowhere.The picture becomes even worse when we account for the fact that the number of shares outstanding declined by approximately 25% over the same period.My 'Strong Buy' rating reflects my views that PayPal offers a highly asymmetric risk-reward ratio at a price of around $40.00 per share. At one point, I would expect the significant free cash flow generation and strong balance sheet to put a hard floor on the share price. JasonDoiy/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images

Summary Even though PayPal (PYPL) faces an increasingly challenging competitive environment and deteriorating growth prospects, the company currently trades at a free cash flow yield in excess of 16%. With net debt of only ~$500 million, the balance sheet is clean and should

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of PYPL either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (“Corcept” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: CORT) for violations of the securities laws.

The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. Corcept announced on December 31, 2025, that the FDA “has issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL) regarding the New Drug Application (NDA) for relacorilant as a treatment for patients with hypertension secondary to hypercortisolism.” According to the Company, “the FDA acknowledged that Corcept’s pivotal GRACE trial met its primary endpoint and that data from the company’s GRADIENT trial provided confirmatory evidence, the Agency concluded it could not arrive at a favorable benefit-risk assessment for relacorilant without Corcept providing additional evidence of effectiveness.” Based on this news, shares of Corcept fell by more than 50%.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at [email protected].

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm 
Brian Schall, Esq. 
310-301-3335
[email protected]

www.schallfirm.com

SAN DIEGO, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating whether Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: KD) or its executive officers complied with the federal securities laws. The investigation focuses on investors’ losses and whether those losses may be recoverable under federal securities laws. If you purchased Kyndryl securities and suffered losses on your investment, join our investigation now: Click Here to Join the Investigation.

For more information, contact Jim Baker at [email protected] or (619) 814-4471. There is no cost or obligation to you.

What Happened?

On February 9, 2026, Kyndryl disclosed in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that its Audit Committee is reviewing the Company’s cash management practices, related disclosures (including regarding the drivers of the Company’s adjusted free cash flow metric), and the efficacy of its internal control over financial reporting following the Company’s receipt of voluntary document requests from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

Kyndryl further disclosed that it expects to report material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting for multiple reporting periods. The Company also stated that its previously issued assessment of internal control over financial reporting and its independent auditor’s opinion included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025 should no longer be relied upon.

In addition, Kyndryl announced the immediate departures of its Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and filed a Form NT 10-Q indicating that it would delay the filing of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Following these disclosures, Kyndryl’s stock price declined approximately 40% in premarket trading on February 9, 2026.

About Johnson Fistel, PLLP | Top Law Firm – Securities Fraud & Investor Rights

Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder-rights law firm with offices in California, New York, Georgia, Idaho, and Colorado. The firm represents individual and institutional investors in shareholder derivative and securities class action lawsuits and also assists foreign investors who purchased shares on U.S. exchanges. To learn more, visit www.johnsonfistel.com.

Achievements

In 2024, Johnson Fistel was ranked among the Top 10 Plaintiff Law Firms by ISS Securities Class Action Services, having recovered approximately $90,725,000 for aggrieved clients in cases where it served as lead or co-lead counsel. This marked the eighth time the firm was recognized based on the total dollar value of final recoveries.

Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.
Johnson Fistel, PLLP has paid for the dissemination of this promotional communication, and Frank J. Johnson is the attorney responsible for its content.

Contact
Johnson Fistel, PLLP
501 W. Broadway, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
James Baker, Investor Relations – or – Frank J. Johnson, Esq.
(619) 814-4471 | [email protected] | [email protected] 

OSHKOSH, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $OSK #oshkoshcorporation--Oshkosh Corporation (NYSE: OSK), a leading innovator of purpose-built vehicles, equipment and services, will participate in a fireside chat at Citi's 2026 Global Industrial Tech and Mobility Conference. Presenting on behalf of Oshkosh will be executive vice president and CFO, Matthew Field. The event is scheduled to start at 1:50 p.m. EST on February 18, 2026. A live webcast of the presentation can be accessed via the company's website at www.oshkoshcorp.com. A r.

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - February 9, 2026) - Lahontan Gold Corp. (TSXV: LG) (OTCQB: LGCXF) is advancing its Santa Fe project in Nevada toward a potential restart, supported by permitting progress and drilling focused on adding mineable ounces. The company is also evaluating silver potential at its nearby West Santa Fe project as exploration continues.

Cannot view this video? Visit:
https://www.b-tv.com/post/ceo-clips-lahontan-gold-advances-santa-fe-toward-restart-in-nevada-btv-60

Lahontan Gold Corp. (TSXV: LG) (OTCQB: LGCXF)
https://lahontangoldcorp.com/

About BTV - Business Television:

For over 25 years, BTV has been a capital markets focused TV production and Digital Marketing Agency. BTV helps companies increase their brand awareness to a national retail and institutional investor audience, combining unique content creation and major distribution services on top tier networks including Bloomberg, CNBC, FOX Business News and financial sites. The BTV suite of strategic products include: BTV- Business Television Show, CEO Clips™, TV Branding Ads, Digital, Lead Gen, Social and Direct Email Marketing Campaigns that reach investors where they research and live on-air and online.

Discover Investment Opportunities!

www.b-tv.com/theagency

About CEO Clips:
CEO Clips - are short company video profiles broadcast to a large audience of investors on TV and 15+ financial sites including Reuters, Yahoo!Finance, and Wall Street Journal.

Contact: Trina Schlingmann (604) 664-7401 x 5 [email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/283078

Source: CEO Clips

Nebius stock (NBIS) jumped over 16% on Friday, February 6, increasing its trailing twelve-month return to an impressive 110%. This recent surge is driven by five main catalysts: Microsoft secured $19.4 billion over five years.

Key Takeaways Small-cap stocks are outperforming large caps in early 2026 amid macro uncertainty.Domestic focus and dollar strength are supporting small-cap relative performance.Improving earnings outlook and attractive forward valuations boost small-cap ETFs. Wall Street has delivered a moderate performance so far this year (as of Feb. 6, 2026). The S&P 500 has gained 1.1%, the Dow Jones has added 3.6%, and the Nasdaq Composite has lost 0.9%. However, the small-cap index Russell 2000 has jumped 6.5% and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 600 Small Cap ETF SPSM surged 8.7% so far this year. This shows that small caps are outdoing their larger peers to start 2026. Let’s find out why.

Volatile Macro Backdrop Important events that have shaped the year-to-date market performance in the investing world are heightened geopolitical tensions, the rebound in the U.S. dollar, a roller-coaster ride of precious metals, winter storm Fern and its impact on natural gas prices, and President Trump’s announcement of former Fed governor Kevin Warsh’s nomination as the next Fed chair.

Geopolitical TensionsGeopolitical worries rose at the start of the year following the U.S. move to oust and capture Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. Moreover, Trump indicated that he was considering potential actions on Iran, while threatening to take Greenland and questioning the value of the NATO alliance. These remarks added to market unease.

President Donald Trump threatened new protectionist measures against Europe over the “Greenland row,” but later eased trade war fears after announcing an Arctic security framework deal at Davos.

Meanwhile, Iran reaffirmed its stance against ending nuclear fuel enrichment in Friday’s discussions with senior U.S. officials, while both parties signaled openness to ongoing diplomacy aimed at averting a possible U.S. military action. Rising geopolitical tensions are great for small-cap investing as these pint-sized stocks mainly have a domestic focus.

A Roller-Coaster Ride for the U.S. Dollar The dollar strengthened following the nomination of Warsh, who is viewed as a hawkish central banker. Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) is off 0.4% this year (as of Feb. 6, 2026) while the ETF has gained 0.2% past week. Any strength in the greenback is good for smaller-cap stocks, as they have less foreign exposure and don’t have to bear the brunt of negative currency translations.

Positive Earnings Momentum U.S. small-cap earnings are showing signs of a rebound. After logging negative earnings growth of 5% and 11.8% in 2024 and 2023, respectively, the S&P 600 index is expected to record 12.7% positive earnings growth in 2025. The index is expected to see steady earnings growth of 10.7% and 14.7% in 2026 and 2027, respectively, per the Earnings Trends issued on Feb. 4, 2026. 

What Does Small-Cap Stock Valuation Say?The Russell 2000 currently trades at a P/E (trailing 12-month) multiple of 36.56X, according to WSJ. However, the index trades at a forward P/E of 23.25X, which  point to the undervaluation of the small-cap index and earnings growth potential. The forward P/E of the Nasdaq 100 is 24.69, higher than the Russell 2000.

Winning Small-Cap ETFs in FocusHere are a few small-cap U.S. ETFs that have been in great momentum currently.

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ - Free Report) – Up 11.6% so far this year (as of Feb. 6, 2026).

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG - Free Report) – Up 9.4%

John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC - Free Report) – Up 8.9%

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF (RZG - Free Report) – Up 8.5%

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT - Free Report) – Up 7.2%

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz reminds investors that class action lawsuits have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies.  Investors have until the deadlines listed below to file a lead plaintiff motion.

Investors suffering losses on their investments are encouraged to contact The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz to discuss their legal rights in these class actions at 310-914-5007 or by email to [email protected].

Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR)
Class Period: July 25, 2024 – October 22, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 9, 2026

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Integer materially overstated its competitive position within the growing EP manufacturing market; (2) despite Integer’s claims of strong visibility into customer demand, the Company was experiencing a sustained deterioration in sales relating to two of its EP devices; (3) in turn, Integer mischaracterized its EP devices as a long-term growth driver for the Company’s C&V segment; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you are an Integer shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

F5, Inc. (NASDAQ: FFIV)
Class Period: October 28, 2024 – October 27, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 17, 2026

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) F5 was the subject of a significant security incident, placing its clientele’s security and the Company’s future prospects at significant risk; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you are a F5 shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

SLM Corporation a/k/a Sallie Mae (NASDAQ: SLM)
Class Period: July 25, 2025 – August 14, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 17, 2026

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) SLM was experiencing a significant increase in early stage delinquencies; (2) accordingly, Defendants overstated the effectiveness of SLM’s loss mitigation and/or loan modification programs, as well as the overall stability of the Company’s PEL delinquency rates; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you are a SLM Corporation shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

Klarna Group plc (NYSE: KLAR)
Class Period: September 7, 2025 – December 22, 2025
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 20, 2026

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) Defendants materially understated the risk that its loss reserves would materially go up within a few months of the IPO, which they either knew of or should have known of given the risk profile of many individuals agreeing to Klarnas buy now, pay later (BNPL) loans; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you are a Klarna shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

Follow us for updates on Twitter: twitter.com/FRC_LAW.

To be a member of these class actions, you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. If you wish to learn more about these class actions, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Frank R. Cruz, of The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100, Los Angeles, California 90067 at 310-914-5007, by email to [email protected], or visit our website at www.frankcruzlaw.com. If you inquire by email please include your mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts

The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, Los Angeles
Frank R. Cruz, 310-914-5007
[email protected]
www.frankcruzlaw.com

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Dogecoin (DOGE), the king of meme coins, has shown the potential to register a 60% price jump. The meme coin’s Bollinger Bands suggest that the DOGE price could soar to $0.15 if broader cryptocurrency market conditions align with the metric.

Dogecoin’s oversold signals strengthen reversal caseMarket data reveals that although the price is currently down, Dogecoin could climb from the $0.9 zone to as high as $0.15. As per the Bollinger Bands, the lower bands are hovering between $0.8683 and $0.9313. The upper band lies at $0.1356, which signals that the meme coin has the potential for higher price levels.

Notably, if Dogecoin can shed a zero and reclaim the $0.10 level, as signaled by the Bollinger Bands, the meme coin could attempt a higher breakout. With Dogecoin already in oversold conditions and bearish momentum weakening, the meme coin could post a reversal and push higher.

As of this writing, Dogecoin is changing hands at $0.09347, representing a 4.69% decline in the last 24 hours. The meme coin had previously hit an intraday peak of $0.09844 as it raised anticipation that it could maintain momentum to reclaim $0.10.

Dogecoin Price Chart | Source: CoinMarketCapHowever, a broader market sell-off and Bitcoin’s decline exerted pressure on altcoins, including Dogecoin. If this risk sentiment fades on the broader crypto market and Bitcoin regains its bullish climb, it could rub off on Dogecoin. This is because the meme coin is coupled to the leading digital crypto asset.

On the positive side, Dogecoin’s technical structure shows the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 33.34, which clearly indicates oversold conditions. The selling pressure is likely to ease at any time now, and this could trigger upward price movement.

Additionally, if DOGE’s trading volume is able to exit the red zone, the development could spark a rally toward the projected $0.15 level. Currently, volume is down by 19.43% at $947.29 million.

You Might Also Like

DOGE whale activity and volume could shape next moveInterestingly, over the weekend, Dogecoin’s price jumped by 6% as more than 203.56 million DOGE hit Robinhood. 

As per the report, an unknown wallet moved the meme coin worth over $20.06 million in a move that reversed the asset’s downward trend.

The meme coin has also shown potential at the close of January, with a 4,537% surge in spot flows. The surge suggests a likely expansion in the price outlook of Dogecoin, which might support its journey to $0.15.

Gary McFarlane

Acting editor-in-chief

Gary McFarlane

Part of the Team Since

Mar 2020

About Author

Gary McFarlane is the editor-in-chief at Cryptonews.com

Has Also Written

Last updated: 

2 minutes ago

If the record sell-out of the qONE token presale is anything to go by, the interest in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) solutions is off the charts right now.

qONE token lists today at around 2pm UTC. To claim tokens, presale contributors are recommended to use the Hyperliquid-compliant Rabby Wallet. More details about the token generation event can be found at the official qLABS website.

qLabs is the company behind a new token that has just raised $950,000 from contributors in a public sale that sold out in 24 hours. Two percent of the total token supply was available to contributors.

qONE is the first quantum-resistant token on Hyperliquid. It is an ERC-20-focused PQC solution developed in partnership with publicly listed Canadian quantum-resilience-focused cybersecurity company 01 Quantum.

In what has been an unusually strong presale, given the bearish backdrop that has descended on crypto markets, the project may have made a wise choice in going for what it describes as a ‘limited’ presale.

We did it.

The $qONE sale is officially SOLD OUT. 🎉

To everyone who showed up, shared the link, helped others onboard, and backed the mission — thank you. This wasn’t just a raise. It was a statement: our community is here for real infrastructure, built for what’s coming.… pic.twitter.com/5AgEjro0oX

— qLABS (@qlabsofficial) February 7, 2026 qONE Team Says ‘Speculators Beware’ qLABS says that the relatively small allocation was designed to reduce early speculative volatility, preserve long-term alignment, and ensure sufficient treasury and ecosystem funding.

Arguably, the crypto industry is belatedly waking up to the threat it poses.

Although tech notables such as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang think that useful quantum computers will not be with us for 15-30 years, others believe it could be more like 5-10 years.

Either way, companies need to start planning now, in crypto and beyond, wherever public-key cryptography is being used.

qLabs believes that companies and other custodians of crypto assets are now taking the reality of preparing for Q-Day (when the quantum computers can derive private keys from public keys by cracking the encryption) seriously.

qLABS technology May Have a Significant First-Mover AdvantageBe it RSA (widely used for internet and banking services), or Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) for generating keys and SHA-256 for hashing (encrypting transactions), or in the case of ERC-20 assets, Keccak-256 used for hashing and ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) for signing – the need for workable solutions is now concentrating minds.

We asked the team at qLabs about how their solution fits in. They see the competitive landscape falling into three distinct groups:

Post-quantum research and migration projects (e.g., Project Eleven), which focus primarily on identifying vulnerable keys and facilitating long-term migration paths, particularly for Bitcoin and legacy assets. Chain-level solutions, where Layer-1s or Layer-2s explore future cryptographic upgrades. These tend to be slow, consensus-heavy, and not backward-compatible with existing assets. Wallet and custody providers are experimenting with stronger key management, but not full NIST-aligned post-quantum cryptography.
As such, Ada Jonuse, Executive Director says, “qONE’s competition is not a single product, but the combination of inaction, delayed chain upgrades, and partial security solutions that do not protect assets today.”

So how does qONE’s quantum-resistant technology differ from competitors like Project Eleven, which is backed, among others, by Coinbase Ventures?

“qLABS technology makes quantum-resistant cryptography compatible with the existing chains. Uniting proprietary zero-knowledge proof engine with NIST-approved post-quantum algorithms, qLABS enables faster and cheaper migration for Layer 1 chains as well as superior level chain performance. And this despite the fact that PQC-based private and public keys are more than 20x bigger than the standard ones,” Jonuse, explains.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the US standards agency. 01 Quantum’s IronCAP technology is the foundation of the qONE post-quantum cryptography solution.

According to the team, the qLABS solution will land in Q1 2026 “to protect major crypto assets from quantum attacks today with a wallet technology solution.”

qLABS is well-positioned to start reaping the benefits of first-mover advantage. “To our knowledge, no viable solutions exist to solve this problem so early,” says Jonuse.

🔥ETHEREUM PREPS FOR THE QUANTUM ERA

The Ethereum Foundation has officially declared Post Quantum (PQ) security a top strategic priority.

A new dedicated team has been formed to protect Ethereum against future quantum computer threats.

Buterin said there is “about a 20% chance… pic.twitter.com/ZuTqQczuKN

— Coin Bureau (@coinbureau) January 24, 2026 Ethereum Assets Will Be First to Benefit qLABS has decided to roll out its solution to ERC-20 first, to be followed by Solana and then other Layer 1 solutions, including Bitcoin.

“We strongly believe that the first step towards fighting the quantum threat is to protect the crypto holders’ assets today, and every chain should start from that safe environment. We have it ready.

“This approach is, by the way, similar to what Project Eleven is communicating about with their next technological milestone to be a safety solution on the wallet side.”

The Quantum-Sig product is the core technology behind the solution, which can be thought of as a security protocol, rather than a replacement wallet that takes ownership of funds.

The product will be available for both end users and businesses. Market participants may be pleasantly surprised to see such strong use-case tokens emerging after a period when literally useless meme coins seemed to rule the roost.

qLABS estimates the total addressable market for ERC-20 assets is $1 trillion, of which qONE aims to provide quantum-resistant security for 2% ($20 billion).

According to the project, value accrual comes from transaction and service fees; staking rewards funded by protocol usage and deflationary mechanics (burns or buybacks)

In a measured tone, Jonuse concludes: “Exact projections are speculative, but the model is designed so that token value scales with secured asset volume, not mere speculation.”

The cryptocurrency industry went under intense pressure last week, with Bitcoin and Ethereum leading the crash and multiple cryptocurrencies hitting new multi-month lows. The crash was more pronounced with Bitcoin, though, and the imbalance in selling pressure is quietly shifting the relationship between the two assets. 

The interesting imbalance is relayed in Ethereum’s performance relative to Bitcoin. A technical analysis of the ETH/BTC ratio shared on the social media platform X by Jonathan Carter indicates that Ethereum may be approaching a critical breakout point against Bitcoin, following an extended period of compression on the 2-week candlestick timeframe chart.

Long-Term Triangle On The Verge Of Break According to technical analysis of the ETH/BTC 2-week chart, Ethereum is nearing an important point against Bitcoin after years of consolidation beneath a descending trendline. This long-running pattern originates from a major peak in relative valuation in July 2017, when 1 ETH was worth 0.154 BTC in Bitcoin terms, and has since formed a series of lower highs to form a falling resistance trendline. The lower boundary of this pattern is a long-tested support zone around 0.02 that has repeatedly drawn buying interest for Ethereum in relation to Bitcoin.

At the time of writing, the ETH/BTC ratio is trading around 0.030. However, the most recent 2-week candlestick has flipped green, and this development is important to the bullish outlook of Ethereum’s performance against Bitcoin.

Source: Chart from Jonathan Carter on X The bullish projection is based on a full playout of the green candlestick with a push towards the descending triangle’s resistance trendline. If the pair can convincingly break above the descending triangle’s upper trend boundary with sustained momentum, then this would allow Ethereum to enter a phase of sustained outperformance against Bitcoin.

How High Could ETH/BTC Go If A Breakout Happens? Crypto analyst Jonathan Carter outlined a series of potential upside targets should the ETH/BTC pair break free from its downward trend. The first target is around 0.040 BTC, which would represent a clear departure from the compressed range seen across recent months. If momentum continues, higher potential objectives include 0.060, 0.085, 0.105, 0.124, and all the way up to the 2017 peak of 0.154.

Translating these ratio-based targets into absolute price levels is less straightforward, as the projections are based on Ethereum’s performance relative to Bitcoin and not standalone price moves. Such a performance can happen in two major ways: either Ethereum receives more inflows than Bitcoin, or Bitcoin could crash more than Ethereum during a market-wide correction.

The former scenario would most likely translate into a sustained rotation into Ethereum and the wider altcoin market, setting the stage for an altcoin season. Nonetheless, both scenarios will see the otherwise strong Bitcoin dominance dropping massively.

ETH trading at $2,041 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com

XRP leads year-to-date inflows with $109M, while Chainlink and Litecoin register modest gains.

Investors withdrew $187 million from digital asset products last week, but the pace of outflows has slowed significantly. Historically, these changes reveal crucial inflection points in investor sentiment.

CoinShares stated that the deceleration suggests that panic selling may be subsiding, which may imply that the market could be stabilizing and that a potential low point in crypto prices might be forming.

Altcoins Outshine Bitcoin In its latest edition of Digital Asset Fund Flows Weekly Report, CoinShares revealed that the latest price correction pushed total assets under management (AuM) down to $129.8 billion, the lowest level since the announcement of US tariffs in March 2025, which also coincided with a local low in asset prices. Trading activity surged last week, which drove exchange-traded product (ETP) volumes to a record-breaking $63.1 billion.

This figure exceeded the previous peak of $56.4 billion recorded in October of the prior year. The strong activity indicates increased investor interest and momentum.

Investor sentiment was negative for Bitcoin, which experienced $264 million in outflows, alongside $11.6 million moving out of short positions. On the other hand, altcoins attracted fresh capital, as XRP led with $63.1 million, Solana $8.2 million, and Ethereum $5.3 million. XRP continues to dominate year-to-date inflows, recording $109 million. Chainlink and Litecoin saw more modest gains of $1.5 million and $1 million.

Additionally, multi-asset products raked in $9.3 million over the past week.

Outflows were concentrated in the US at $214 million, with Sweden at $135 million, and Australia at just $1.2 million. Despite this, other regions experienced meaningful inflows. For instance, Germany received $87.1 million, Switzerland $30.1 million, Canada $21.4 million, Brazil $16.7 million, and Hong Kong $6.8 million. The data highlights a mixed global picture.

You may also like: Why Japan’s Election Is a Short-Term Drag but Long-Term Win for Bitcoin Vitalik Buterin Increases ETH Selling as Price Falls Below $2K Strategy: Balance Sheet Stable Unless BTC Falls Below This Critical Level Favorable ETFs and Macro Trends Price weakness continues as Bitcoin slipped to $69,000 on Sunday and has hovered near that level into Monday. Despite this, Bitget CMO Ignacio Aguirre Franco said that the crypto asset has a path to the $150,000-$180,000 range this year if ETF flows stabilize and macro conditions improve. Ongoing Layer 2 development and growing DeFi activity strengthen Ethereum’s outlook, the exec said while predicting a potential target of $5,000-$6,000 with increased traditional finance participation. Franco added,

“Regulatory developments like the recent Clarity Bill and advancing market-structure legislation will also positively impact crypto markets by providing clearer compliance frameworks that reduce uncertainty and make these assets more attractive to institutions and traditional funds. As institutional capital finds easier entry points and global regulatory alignment improves, overall market stability and innovation are reinforced.”

Tags:

If you hold either US dollars or Bitcoin, then you're a little poorer this morning than when you went to bed last night. It doesn't matter whether there's cash in your pocket or sats in your wallet; both have less purchasing power today than they did yesterday.

That's because Bitcoin is down, the dollar is down too, but the feeling isn't quite the same. That quiet little subtraction before you have even had coffee usually doesn't take the value of the dollar itself into account, unless you live outside the US.

Today’s charts make it obvious. BTC slid roughly 3% overnight, the kind of move that feels personal when you are holding it, the kind of move that makes people say “see,” like it proves a point.

Bitcoin drops 3% overnightAt the same time, the dollar weakened on the foreign exchange side, roughly 0.7% on the day by the DXY gauge, which is small enough to shrug at, and large enough to matter if you are keeping score.

The dollar falls 0.7% overnightThe difference is that one of these moves gets called a dump, and the other gets called background noise, because the paper in your wallet still says one dollar.

That is the trick with cash, it looks the same while it changes.

The dollar isn't worth a dollar anymoreThe scrumpled-up dollar you recently found in an old jacket you haven't worn in three years feels the same, but trust me, it's not. If you're struggling to understand this, Frank Reynolds has a great explanation.

Jokes aside, if you want the cleanest version of why, you start with purchasing power.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U index, not seasonally adjusted, was 300.840 in Feb 2023, according to the BLS.

The latest complete CPI-U print we have as of now is Dec 2025 at 324.054 on FRED. That is the slow part of the loss, the part you do not feel on any single morning.

Do the math, 300.840 divided by 324.054, and the Feb 2023 dollar has about 92.8 cents of purchasing power by Dec 2025, before you even bring foreign exchange into it.

Now layer the dollar’s external value on top, since the whole point of DXY-style talk is that the world prices you in real time.

The chart shows a roughly 4.56% drop in DXY over the three-year window, and using that FX leg with the CPI leg is how you get the “my dollar is really 88.7 cents” gut punch.

0.955 times 0.928 lands around 0.887, call it 88.7 cents, and that is before you make the more complicated argument about how people experience inflation unevenly, depending on what they buy.

Dollar performance over the last 3 yearsThere is a more conservative way to do the same comparison, and it matters because critics will try to poke holes in the index we choose.

The broad trade-weighted dollar index, DTWEXBGS on FRED, is close to flat over the comparable window, it nudges the composite “cash reality” toward about 92.5 cents instead of 88.7.

So, at the very least we can put it within that range, and it is hard to argue with, your $1 bill is still a $1 bill, and in real terms it buys something closer to $0.89 to $0.93 of what it used to, depending on whether you use DXY or a broad trade-weighted basket.

That is the baseline, and it has nothing to do with crypto, it is just the quiet math of living through time.

And then there is Bitcoin.On Feb 3, 2023, BTC was around $23,424. Using that starting point offers a perspective everyone forgets during a pullback, up about 226% from then to now.

A 226% gain means something simple, $1 becomes about $3.26.

That is not a prediction, it is not a pep talk, it is just arithmetic, 1 plus 2.26.

Bitcoin performance over the last 3 yearsA $1 “Bitcoin purchase” in early Feb 2023 becomes roughly $3.26 today, even after the recent dump.

A $1 bill from early Feb 2023 becomes roughly $0.89 to $0.93 in real terms by late 2025, depending on whether you want the DXY punch or the broad trade-weighted caution.

People can hate Bitcoin for a lot of reasons, and plenty of those reasons are fair, but it is difficult to look at that scoreboard and pretend cash is the safe thing just because it does not move on a chart every minute.

The part nobody wants to say out loud, cash has volatility tooMost people think volatility looks like red candles.

They do not think volatility looks like groceries creeping up while your paycheck stays the same, or like a vacation that costs more every year, or like rent climbing even when your apartment does not get any bigger.

That is still a price chart, it just lives inside your life.

CPI is the public version of that story, it is imperfect, it is averaged, it is political in the way all measurements become political, and it is still the best widely used yardstick we have.

When CPI-U rises from 300.840 to 324.054, that is the world telling you the same dollar buys less. There is no drama, no liquidation cascade, no influencer with a shocked face thumbnail, and there is a steady leak.

A lot of the public debate about Bitcoin gets stuck on whether it is “money.”

I do not even think you need that argument for this. The human interest angle is simpler, people save, people wait, people try to hold onto the value of their work, and the default savings technology for most people has been cash, or cash-adjacent, and they are shocked when they realize the definition of “safe” has quietly shifted.

You can see why Bitcoin keeps coming back into the conversation even after every crash. It offers a different kind of risk. It is loud, and it is social, and it is the kind of thing you can stare at in real time, and that visibility makes it emotionally harder.

Cash feels calm, and that calm is the point, and the math shows the calm has a cost.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

To be clear, this is not a pitch for everyone to become a Bitcoin maximalist. It is a reminder that the thing we treat as neutral is not neutral.

What today’s drop actually tells you about the next yearBitcoin dropping 3% overnight is not the story, it is the entry point.

The real story is the macro backdrop that makes moves like this cluster, and what it implies for the months ahead. When real yields are high, risk assets tend to feel heavier.

TradingEconomics has the 10-year TIPS yield near the high 1% area recently, a sign that “real return” is available in the traditional system, which can siphon attention away from speculative assets, and tighten the financial oxygen Bitcoin often thrives on.

Liquidity matters too. The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, tracked as total assets on FRED, has been a decent weather vane for broad financial conditions, not because it is magic, and because it is one of the clearer public signals of how tight or loose the system is.

When liquidity is draining, leverage becomes expensive, and the marginal buyer gets cautious.

Then you add the new market structure, which is ETFs.

That plumbing changes the shape of Bitcoin’s demand, and it changes how narrative turns into flows. Spot Bitcoin ETFs saw about $5.7 billion in withdrawals between November and January.

Sentiment can swing quickly when the “easy access” vehicle is also the “easy exit” vehicle. Whether you agree with the framing or not, the data point matters because it tells you where the marginal pressure can come from.

Put those three together, real yields, liquidity, and flows, and you get a useful way to think about the next 3 to 12 months without pretending you can predict Tuesday.

If real yields stay elevated, and liquidity stays tight, Bitcoin can still perform well over longer horizons, and it may chop, it may scare people, it may have more sharp down days.

If the macro regime shifts toward easier policy, and yields fall, Bitcoin tends to get its legs back.

If risk-off hits, and leverage unwinds, Bitcoin gets dragged around with everything else for a while, and the long-term comparison to cash does not disappear, but it does stop being emotionally satisfying in the moment.

The takeaway I keep coming back toMost people think they are choosing between stability and volatility.

They are choosing between visible volatility and invisible volatility.

Over the last three years, Bitcoin has been the loud asset that still turned $1 into roughly $3.26, even after a nasty pullback.

Cash has been the quiet asset that turned $1 into something like $0.89 to $0.93 in real terms, depending on whether you prefer the DXY framing or the broad trade-weighted dollar approach, anchored on CPI and the broad dollar.

That is why this moment matters. Not because Bitcoin dipped, it always dips. It matters because every dip creates the same psychological trap, people look at the red candles and forget the slow bleed in the background.

They wake up and feel poorer, and they blame the thing that moved.

They almost never blame the thing that stayed still.

Posted in

After a highly volatile week, Ethereum's price appears to be taking a pause, trading within a more stable range. Buyers stepped in to stop a deeper sell-off, but the rebound has struggled to gain real momentum. As the ETH price moves closer to resistance near $2,157, buying pressure is starting to fade.