Market Signal Briefing

Solana is showing signs of stress after months of sustained losses, growing outflows, and weakening price structure. Recent on-chain and market data suggest traders may be approaching a decisive moment. While price action remains fragile, historical patterns are drawing attention as selling pressure intensifies and long-term holders reposition.

Exchange Outflows Signal Stress, Not ConfidenceAccording to Ali Martinez, more than 1.07 million SOL left centralized exchanges over the last 72 hours. Such withdrawals often reflect fear-driven self-custody rather than fresh accumulation. Besides that, Santiment data shows Solana-focused ETFs recorded $11.9 million in net outflows. This marked the second-largest capital exit on record.

Source: X

Significantly, Solana has lost roughly 62% of its market value over four months. Consequently, market behavior now resembles late-stage drawdowns seen in previous cycles. Moreover, heavy ETF outflows often appear near exhaustion phases, when sellers dominate flows regardless of price.

At the time of writing, Solana trades near $87 with muted daily price movement. However, weekly losses remain steep. Hence, short-term stability does not yet signal recovery.

Price Structure Break Signals SOL Trend WeaknessAnalysis from CryptoJobs3 points to a confirmed loss of monthly support between $98 and $100. This region previously acted as a strong demand zone. However, repeated closes below it indicate fading bullish control.

Additionally, price rebounds have grown weaker and continue to stall near former resistance. This behavior reflects a broader downtrend rather than temporary volatility. The next major support rests near $78, which aligns with a long-term weekly demand area.

If price breaks below $78, analysts expect selling pressure to accelerate. Consequently, downside targets extend toward $70, then $60. Deeper historical demand exists near the $48 to $45 range, where buyers previously stepped in.

SOL Historical Fractals Point to a Possible InflectionAnother comparison draws attention to longer-term patterns. According to Galaxy, Solana shows a structure similar to late 2022. During that period, SOL based near $8 after an extended decline. Today, SOL trades between $85 and $90, resting on a long-term descending trendline.

Source: X

Significantly, weekly RSI now sits near 37, reflecting deep oversold conditions. A similar RSI compression preceded the 2022 reversal. Key supports remain at $80 and $65. A failure there risks a deeper sweep toward $55.

However, upside scenarios still exist. A reclaim of $120 would signal trendline recovery. That move could open paths toward $160 and eventually $220 to $260. Historically, such compression phases often precede sharp expansions.

Published: Feb 09, 2026 at 21:33

On February 9, 2026, the global crypto community is still reeling from the details of a catastrophic technical error at Bithumb, South Korea’s leading digital asset platform.

Late last week, a systemic database glitch resulted in the erroneous "transfer" of 620,000 BTC to various user accounts. To put that in perspective, at current prices, the "ghost" Bitcoin was worth approximately $43.4 billion—a figure representing nearly 3% of the total Bitcoin supply.

The anatomy of the blunder The absurdity of the situation lies in the scale of the mismatch: while the exchange’s internal ledger credited users with over 600,000 coins, Bithumb’s actual on-chain reserves at the time were reported to be just 175 BTC. This was not an on-chain hack, but a massive failure of the internal accounting mechanism.

For a few hours, thousands of retail traders woke up to find themselves "billionaires" on paper. While the exchange quickly halted withdrawals and has reportedly recovered nearly 100% of the erroneous credits, the incident has sparked an intense investigation by South Korean regulators into the exchange's "proof of reserves" protocols.

Market contagion & sentiment This glitch couldn't have come at a worse time. It occurred just as Bitcoin (BTC) slid back below the $70,000 mark, fueled by the "Warsh Shock" (concerns over hawkish U.S. Fed leadership) and institutional outflows. The Bithumb scare added a layer of "existential dread" to the market, with the Fear & Greed Index plummeting to 14 (Extreme Fear). 

As Coinidol.com reported the cryptocurrency has stalled above the $68,000 support level, but remains below the moving average lines. If bears break below the $68,000 support, Bitcoin could continue to fall towards its $53,000 bottom.  

Disclaimer. This analysis and forecast are the personal opinions of the author. The data provided is collected by the author and is not sponsored by any company or token developer. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell cryptocurrency and should not be viewed as an endorsement by Coinidol.com. Readers should do their research before investing in funds.

PEPE faces continued selling pressure near $0.0000037 support, signaling short-term bearish momentum and a cautious market outlook.

Newton Gitonga2 min read

9 February 2026, 09:35 PM

The PEPE price chart shows that the token initially rallied to around $0.00000385 but faced strong resistance, leading to a sharp pullback. The price had been fluctuating in a consolidation range between roughly $0.00000375 and $0.00000380. It recently dropped to $0.000003708, indicating increased selling pressure. Overall, the pattern suggests short-term bearish momentum. Support near $0.0000037 acts as a critical level to watch for potential stabilization or further declines.

PEPE Price Eyes Rebound Near Key Support Amid Broader DowntrendThe chart shows that PEPE has been in a broad downtrend since late 2025, with the price gradually declining inside defined downward channels. Recently, the price has been basing near a key demand zone between $0.0000036 and $0.0000038. This zone is acting as short-term support. According to the analyst “PEPE Whale,” this support could hold, giving the market room to attempt a rebound. The chart highlights previous failed attempts to break higher, followed by consolidation. This suggests the downtrend will continue and calls for caution until a clear breakout occurs.

Upside momentum could start if PEPE holds above the support zone and breaks the key level at $0.0000050. Analysts identify potential resistance levels at $0.0000068 and $0.000010, which would act as short-term and medium-term targets if the rebound gains traction. However, if the support fails, downside risk remains open, keeping the broader downtrend intact. Essentially, the next moves hinge on whether demand near $0.0000036–$0.0000038 can sustain buying pressure, triggering a recovery.

PEPE Faces Continued Bearish Pressure Amid Short-Term ConsolidationLooking at the 1-day PEPE/USD chart, PEPE has been in a clear downtrend, with the price forming lower highs and lower lows over time. After a brief period of minor upward movement, the price continues to struggle near the $0.0000037 level. Selling pressure remains dominant. Short-term consolidation is visible, but the overall direction is still bearish.

The technical indicators reinforce this trend. The MACD line is below the signal line, and the histogram shows negative bars, signaling continued bearish momentum. The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) is at -0.07, suggesting capital is flowing out of the market, which supports the downward price movement. These indicators highlight that sellers are currently controlling the market. 

ENRICH your inbox with our best storiesDon’t miss out and join our newsletter to get the latest,
well-curated news from the crypto world!

Newton Gitonga covers cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and digital finance. He specializes in breaking down complex trends with clear, data-driven reporting. His work focuses on market analysis, technical insights, and the evolving role of altcoins in shaping global markets.

Read more about

PEPE

3 mins mins

TON Pay is a Telegram Mini Apps crypto payments SDKA new payments software development kit, TON Pay, brings crypto checkout to Telegram Mini Apps, enabling fast, low‑cost transfers, as reported by LiveBitcoinNews. The SDK is positioned to make cryptocurrencies usable in everyday in‑app commerce by embedding payments directly where users interact.

Developers can incorporate crypto acceptance without diverting users outside Telegram. The approach aims to reduce checkout friction and streamline payment flows within Mini Apps.

Why TON Pay matters for Telegram commerce and merchantsFor merchants, embedded payments inside Mini Apps can shorten the path from discovery to purchase. Analysts view this as aligned with the broader “super app” trend that merges chat, commerce, and payments, according to Ainvest.com.

Before we turn to the technical roadmap, an official perspective helps clarify goals and performance claims.

“The SDK empowers merchants to accept payments seamlessly and natively on TON through a simple SDK integration, supporting tokens like Toncoin (TON) and USDT… with sub‑second transaction times and fees averaging below US$0.01,” said Nikola Plecas, Vice President of Payments, TON Foundation.

At launch, the emphasis is on practical checkout: support for Toncoin and stablecoins such as USDT, low fees, and sub‑second execution within Telegram Mini Apps. The integration model is designed to keep the user journey inside Telegram, which may improve conversion for digital goods and services.

For developers, an SDK‑first pattern can avoid building wallet infrastructure from scratch and reduce maintenance overhead. Merchant onboarding and UX will depend on how Mini Apps present payment prompts, balance displays, and confirmations.

At the time of this writing, Bitcoin hovers around $70,000, a contextual marker for broader market risk appetite based on data from Yahoo Finance Canada. This backdrop can influence merchant and user willingness to experiment with new payment rails.

Security, compliance, and availability considerationsWallet-agnostic design, governance and fraud risk considerationsAs reported by Cointelegraph, TON Pay is described as wallet‑agnostic and seeks to remove frictions like gas fees and complex multi‑wallet flows. The roadmap highlighted there includes subscriptions, gasless transactions, merchant analytics, MPC wallets, and region‑specific off‑ramps. While embedded payments can lower abandonment, merchants still face routine web‑risk exposures such as refund fraud, account takeovers, and chargeback‑like disputes via off‑ramps. Governance and potential centralization questions in the broader ecosystem warrant monitoring from a risk committee perspective.

Regional KYC, off-ramps, and taxes: availability caveatsAvailability is likely to vary by region given KYC, sanctions screening, and local money‑transmission rules. Cash‑out depends on compliant off‑ramps, and merchants remain responsible for tax reporting aligned to their jurisdictions.

FAQ about TON PayWhich assets does TON Pay support (Toncoin, USDT) and what are the fees and transaction speeds?It supports Toncoin and stablecoins like USDT. Public statements emphasize sub‑second execution and average fees below US$0.01.

How can merchants or developers integrate TON Pay, what SDKs, APIs, and wallet options are required?Integration occurs via the TON Pay SDK inside Telegram Mini Apps. It follows a wallet‑agnostic model to connect users’ wallets through the Mini App flow.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

TL;DR

A Bloomberg Intelligence strategist said Bitcoin may return to the $10,000 zone if global risk appetite keeps weakening and equity volatility rises. The analyst described the $64,000 area as a pause, not a firm floor, warning that the recent rebound may be temporary. Pro-crypto analysts highlighted ETF adoption and payment growth as factors that could reduce the depth of any decline.
Bitcoin started February with sharp swings after falling to $61,000 and later recovering toward $70,000. The movement reopened the discussion about whether the market is experiencing a normal adjustment or a longer reset. Mike McGlone from Bloomberg Intelligence presented a cautious view and argued that the enthusiasm still needs to cool.

He said the $64,000 region worked as a common price zone last year and should be treated as a reference level rather than solid support. A rebound to $72,000, in his opinion, would equal a traditional 20% bounce seen in bearish phases. The strategist added that Bitcoin continues to behave as a speculative asset influenced by liquidity conditions and not yet as digital gold.

Market participants with a pro-crypto stance responded that the structure today is different from previous cycles. They pointed to spot ETFs in the United States, clearer rules in Asia, and the growth of stablecoins for payments. Those elements, they said, create real demand that did not exist in earlier downturns.

Bitcoin Could Retrace To $10,000 And Market Signals McGlone connected the crypto outlook with the situation in traditional markets. He expects the calm in the S&P 500 to fade and believes stretched equity valuations could trigger a wider risk reduction. Under that scenario, high-beta assets such as Bitcoin would face pressure. The analyst mentioned that only a sustained move above $90,000 would challenge his negative framework.

Data from the first week of February showed net outflows from major exchange-traded funds, including more than $300 million from a leading product. The flows suggested that short-term investors were taking profits after the rally of late 2025. At the same time, on-chain metrics indicated that long-term holders kept most positions unchanged.

Equity Volatility And Adoption Drivers Supporters of the asset highlighted that developer activity and cross-border payment use continued to expand. Payment processors in Latin America and Southeast Asia reported higher volumes settled in stablecoins during January. Exchanges also launched new custody services for pension funds and family offices.

Bitcoin traded near $69,600 at press time and remained about 10% lower for the week. Technical analysts said reclaiming $70,000 could open the path to $72,500, while failure to hold that range might invite another test of lower levels.

Journalist

Posted: February 10, 2026

Bitcoin [BTC] has yet to establish a sustained bullish structure since its decline to $62,000 earlier in February. Although the asset trades 15.8% higher at $71,800, the price remains significantly below its all-time high, leaving the recovery vulnerable to renewed selling pressure.

The recent rebound has not removed downside risk. Long-term holder behavior remains a key variable, as shrinking profitability can historically increase the incentive to exit positions.

In highly volatile conditions, even modest shifts in LTH conviction can materially affect price direction.

LTH vs. STH profitability signals bearish bias On-chain data reinforces this risk; market structure indicators suggest BTC remains in a broader bearish phase, with price stability masking the potential for further downside.

This assessment is supported by the long-term holder to short-term holder Spent Output Profit Ratio (LTH/STH SOPR). The metric compares realized profitability between both cohorts.

At the time of writing,  the readings showed that short-term holders were more profitable than long-term holders, confirming a bearish skew in market structure.

Source: Alphractal

When long-term holder profitability contracts, selling pressure can increase as investors attempt to preserve remaining gains. If LTHs begin distributing supply, it could weigh on price and sentiment, particularly in an environment where demand remains subdued.

Long-term holders are defined as addresses holding Bitcoin for more than 155 days, while short-term holders have held for 155 days or less.

Long-term holders continue to accumulate Despite declining relative profitability, long-term holders remain largely inactive. On-chain data shows no significant increase in distribution from this cohort, suggesting conviction remains intact.

Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) supports this view. The metric indicates that older coins are not being moved, confirming that long-term holders continue to retain their Bitcoin despite current market conditions.

Source: CryptoQuant

This behavior aligns with a gradual rise in Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), which has increased steadily to 0.21, at press time. A reading above the neutral level of 0 indicates that investors, on aggregate, are more profitable than they were five days earlier.

Rising aggregate profitability may explain why long-term holders remain patient, as they appear to be positioning for a broader shift toward higher returns.

Bitcoin dominance and capital flows At press time, Bitcoin dominance sat at 58%, reflecting its share of total crypto market capitalization according to CoinGlass. This level suggests a balance between supply and demand, which has helped keep prices relatively stable.

A sustained increase of 5% or more in dominance would typically indicate fresh capital inflows. However, this has not materialized. CoinMarketCap data shows that approximately $1.12 trillion has been wiped from Bitcoin’s market capitalization since its all-time high.

Without a gradual return of capital at this scale, price is likely to remain constrained, with Bitcoin continuing to trade near the lower end of its current range.

Final Thoughts LTH profitability has fallen below that of STHs, a structure often associated with bearish market dominance. The overall Bitcoin profitability continues to improve as holders across cohorts remain largely inactive.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Treasury Secretary Clary Bessent crushed any hopes for a Bitcoin rescue package Tuesday, telling desperate crypto investors they’re on their own as digital currencies keep tanking. Her blunt message came as Bitcoin’s brutal slide continues, wiping out billions in investor wealth over recent weeks.

Bitcoin’s getting hammered. The world’s biggest cryptocurrency dropped over 40% in just a few weeks, sending shockwaves through trading floors and online forums where retail investors watch their portfolios evaporate. Many traders didn’t see this coming. Ethereum and other major digital assets are bleeding too, with some altcoins down even worse than Bitcoin itself. The carnage is pretty much across the board.

Not happening, Bessent said.

“Bitcoin is not a government-backed asset,” Bessent told reporters during her Tuesday press conference, her tone leaving zero room for interpretation. “It operates independently of federal systems, and bailouts are not applicable.” She basically slammed the door on any government intervention, crushing speculation that had been building among desperate crypto holders. Some analysts had floated the idea that Washington might step in to stabilize markets, but those dreams just died.

Crypto exchanges can’t keep up with the chaos. Trading volumes exploded as panicked investors rush to either cut losses or buy what they think might be the dip. Several platforms reported temporary slowdowns, and customer service lines are jammed. Meanwhile, regulatory watchdogs are keeping close tabs on the situation, though they’re not saying much publicly about what comes next.

Wall Street’s watching nervously.

Traditional finance folks worry about spillover effects, especially given how many institutions now hold crypto on their books. But there’s no sign Washington plans to act, despite the mounting pressure. Bessent’s comments make that crystal clear – the feds are staying out of this mess.

Bitcoin’s decentralized nature is exactly why no bailout makes sense, Bessent argued. “This is a market-driven phenomenon,” she said, emphasizing how crypto operates outside normal financial rails. The whole point of Bitcoin was to avoid government control, so asking for government rescue seems pretty contradictory. Previous crypto crashes followed similar patterns, with wild price swings but no federal intervention.

And miners are getting crushed too. The price drop hammers their profit margins, forcing some operations to shut down temporarily or scramble for emergency funding. These guys invested heavily in equipment and electricity contracts, betting on higher Bitcoin prices that aren’t materializing. Related coverage: Crypto Firms Bleed Millions as Bitcoin.

The crypto world keeps evolving despite the chaos. New technology developments and regulatory discussions continue behind the scenes, but nobody knows what’s coming next. Market participants are basically flying blind right now.

Bessent’s stance reveals something important – the US government doesn’t see Bitcoin as a systemic threat to financial stability. That’s key for understanding why there’s no rescue coming. Unlike banks or major corporations that might get bailouts during crises, crypto exists in its own separate universe.

Investors are scrambling to adjust their strategies. Many are reassessing whether they can stomach this level of volatility, especially retail traders who jumped in during the bull market. The lack of any safety net is becoming painfully obvious.

But the Treasury’s approach fits with ongoing regulatory debates in Washington. Policymakers are still figuring out how to handle the growing crypto market, and Bessent’s remarks reinforce the current hands-off framework that’s been in place.

The SEC is ramping up its oversight too. The agency increased scrutiny of crypto assets recently, though their focus stays on preventing fraud and protecting investors rather than propping up prices. Chair Gary Gensler has been vocal about enforcement priorities.

Formal regulatory changes remain up in the air. No concrete proposals are on the table yet, leaving market participants guessing about future rules.

On February 5, 2026, Bitcoin briefly touched $18,000 – its lowest level since 2024. The crash triggered widespread panic, with some exchanges experiencing outages from the trading surge. Vanguard Digital Assets reported massive client inquiries about portfolio safety. CEO Mark Eldridge said his firm is “working to provide necessary support and information” to anxious clients. This follows earlier reporting on Bitcoin Jumps 12% as Coinbase Premium.

The Federal Reserve stayed quiet about crypto’s meltdown. Chairperson Janet Hargrove focused on traditional economic indicators at a separate event, completely ignoring digital assets. Her silence adds to uncertainty about potential future measures.

Crypto advocacy groups want clarity from federal institutions. The Blockchain Association argues that regulatory uncertainty leaves investors vulnerable, but key agencies haven’t responded to their calls for guidance.

International regulators are paying attention too. The European Central Bank restated its cautious stance on February 6, 2026, with President Christine Lagarde warning about volatility risks. Japan’s Financial Services Agency started talks with local exchanges about handling the trading surge and potential liquidity problems.

BlackRock acknowledged crypto volatility concerns in a February 5 investor briefing. Chief Investment Officer Larry Fink said the firm is maintaining its crypto exposure, viewing current conditions as a “test of resilience.” Tesla, which holds significant Bitcoin, hasn’t updated its position since the crash began. CEO Elon Musk stayed silent on social media, leaving investors guessing about the company’s next move.

The Bank for International Settlements issued fresh warnings about crypto market instability on February 6, 2026. General Manager Agustín Carstens highlighted how the current crash demonstrates Bitcoin’s “inherent volatility and speculative nature.” His comments echo longstanding concerns from central bankers worldwide about digital assets threatening monetary stability.

MicroStrategy, holding over 130,000 Bitcoin worth billions at peak prices, faces mounting shareholder pressure. The company’s stock plummeted alongside Bitcoin, with activist investors demanding CEO Michael Saylor reconsider the aggressive crypto strategy that once made headlines.

Post Views: 1

3 mins mins

Strategy (MicroStrategy) buys 1,142 BTC for ~$90M: what to knowStrategy (MicroStrategy) added 1,142 BTC last week for about $90 million, implying an average purchase price near $78,815 per bitcoin, as reported by CoinCentral (https://coincentral.com/strategy-mstr-stock-slides-3-despite-adding-1142-btc-to-its-expanding-treasury/). The buy occurred during the week of February 2–8, 2026.

The move extends the company’s treasury accumulation program, keeping MSTR’s equity profile tightly aligned with bitcoin. Funding mechanics and balance sheet positioning remain central to investor focus.

Why it matters: ATM equity funding, dilution, and treasury strategyAccording to the report, Strategy financed the purchase through at-the-market equity issuance, selling about 616,000 shares for roughly $89.5 million. Equity funding can dilute existing holders, particularly if issuance accelerates when the stock is weak.

Analyst commentary in that coverage frames the buy as conviction-driven rather than reactive to short-term price action. It also highlights how repeated accumulation underpins the firm’s core narrative.

“He almost has to keep buying,” said MarketWatch (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/he-almost-has-to-keep-buying-why-michael-saylors-strategy-is-doubling-down-on-bitcoin-d6c8dcd6), characterizing why the company continues doubling down on bitcoin even amid drawdowns.

The stock reaction was muted-to-negative around the update, with shares sliding more than 3% despite the incremental BTC, the report noted. That response reflects ongoing concerns about dilution and paper P/L sensitivity to BTC.

At the time of this writing, MSTR traded near $136.46, up about 1.13% intraday, based on data from Yahoo Finance (https://finance.yahoo.com/). Price data may be delayed and are for context only.

The report also tallied updated holdings at about 714,644 BTC acquired for roughly $54.4 billion, implying an average cost near $76,056 per coin. With a current market value around $49.2 billion, that equates to an estimated paper loss of approximately $5.2 billion.

Balance sheet, dilution risk, and sustainability outlookDebt maturities and liquidity flexibility through 2028The report indicates no material debt maturities before 2028, which reduces near-term liquidity pressure. That long-dated profile provides optionality to manage issuance pacing and treasury decisions through volatility.

ATM equity usage and dilution signals to monitorOngoing ATM usage concentrates attention on three signals: the effective price of new shares relative to perceived bitcoin-linked NAV, the cadence of issuance, and remaining authorization capacity. Faster issuance when shares are weak can magnify dilution.

Conversely, slower issuance alongside long-dated liabilities can limit immediate pressure but may constrain purchase velocity. The sustainability of the accumulation model remains condition-dependent on equity market receptivity and BTC volatility.

FAQ about MicroStrategy Bitcoin purchaseHow did Strategy fund the purchase, did it issue new shares via an ATM equity offering or add debt?Funded via an ATM equity offering, selling about 616,000 shares for roughly $89.5 million; no new debt disclosed in the report.

What are Strategy’s total BTC holdings, average cost basis, and current paper gain or loss?About 714,644 BTC at ~$76,056 average cost; roughly $5.2 billion paper loss at ~$49.2 billion value versus ~$54.4 billion cost.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

Ripple said on Monday it has expanded its institutional custody platform through new integrations with Securosys and Figment.

The company said it is adding hardware security modules to enable banks and custodians to deploy custody services and offer staking without necessarily operating their own validator or key-management infrastructure.

Building on Ripple’s recent acquisition of Palisade and the integration of Chainalysis compliance tools, the custody upgrades allow regulated institutions to manage cryptographic keys using on-premises or cloud-based HSMs and to offer staking on networks such as Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL), with compliance checks embedded directly into transaction workflows.

Ripple said the integrations are intended to reduce deployment complexity and support faster rollout of custody services for institutional clients. Ripple has been pushing further into institutional infrastructure activity as it expands beyond payments with custody, treasury and post-trade services for regulated companies.

Ripple is a US-based blockchain infrastructure company that provides payment and custody technology to financial institutions and is the issuer of the XRP (XRP) token and the dollar-pegged stablecoin RLUSD, which it launched in December 2024.

The update comes weeks after the company launched a corporate treasury platform that integrates traditional cash management systems with digital asset infrastructure.

Institutional staking and yield products gain tractionInstitutional interest in staking has grown as proof-of-stake networks mature and regulatory expectations continue to evolve.

In October, Figment expanded its integration with Coinbase, enabling Coinbase Custody and Prime clients to stake additional proof-of-stake assets beyond Ether. The update gave institutional customers access to staking on networks including Solana (SOL), Sui (SUI), Aptos (APT) and Avalanche (AVAX) through Figment’s infrastructure.

In November, Anchorage Digital added staking support for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, enabling HYPE (HYPE) staking alongside its existing custody services. The bank said the offering would be available through Anchorage Digital Bank, its Singapore entity, and its self-custody wallet Porto, with validator operations supported by Figment.

While staking enables institutions to earn rewards on proof-of-stake networks, parallel efforts have also emerged to generate yield from Bitcoin, which does not support staking.

Earlier this month, Fireblocks said it will integrate Stacks, enabling institutional clients to access Bitcoin-based lending and yield products. The integration uses Stacks’ roughly five-second block times while settling transactions to the Bitcoin ledger for finality, addressing latency constraints that have limited institutional use of BTC-based decentralized finance.

Magazine: A ‘tsunami’ of wealth is headed for crypto: Nansen’s Alex Svanevik

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Crypto analyst Austin has commented on how XRP could record a 1,500% rally to $24 based on an Elliot Wave theory. He also stated that the rally will be swift, which is why the analyst warned investors to be prepared when the current correction is over. 

XRP Eyes 1,500% Rally To $24 as Analyst Warns Investors To Be Prepared In an X post, Austin shared an accompanying chart showing that XRP could rally to $24 on Wave 5 of an Elliot Wave analysis. Meanwhile, the altcoin is expected to reach between $8 and $14 on Wave 3, which the analyst expects to happen anytime soon. He remarked that XRP is well-positioned to begin the macro 3rd wave into price discovery at any moment. 

Austin further mentioned that the XRP rally on this Wave 3 could be right around the corner or that it could take a while longer to work out this correction before the next impulse. However, he warned investors to be prepared because when this correction resolves, which he is confident it will, it will result in swift and violent moves to higher prices just like the Wave 1 move. 

Source: Chart from Austin on X The analyst also noted that the 2.618 extension sits at $8.47 while the 4.236 extension is at $13.64. He stated that these are both good targets to aim for, but expects higher prices given the length of time XRP has been consolidating and building out its current structure. 

Why XRP Is Ready To “Blast” Into Price Discovery Austin stated that on the macro scale, XRP appears ready to enter price discovery at any moment. He explained that the altcoin has experienced a 7-year contracting triangle accumulation structure followed by an explosive 5-wave breakout to test the all-time highs (ATHs) at Macro Wave 1. 

The analyst further noted that XRP has been in an ABC correction/reaccumulation for over a year, which has resulted in mass fear and capitulation down to a .702 to .786 retrace. He assured that this has been nothing but a macro wave 2. Meanwhile, Austin also reminded investors that XRP is the only crypto asset with complete regulatory clarity in the U.S. following the settlement of the SEC lawsuit. 

He added that Ripple has continued to silently build out the infrastructure required to foster global adoption when the time is right to “flip the switch.” Notably, the crypto firm recently unveiled its roadmap for institutional DeFi on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), highlighting XRP’s role at the core of this infrastructure as it rolls out compliance-focused features to attract institutions. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.44, up in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.40 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Adobe Stock, chart from Tradingview.com

XRP is taking a hit. The token has broken below its aggregate cost basis, and that triggered panic across the board. A big chunk of holders are now dumping their bags, not to lock in profits, but to cut losses, according to data from Glassnode.

The Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR), using the 7-day EMA, has collapsed from 1.16 in July 2025 to 0.96 right now. If that number is above 1, they’re walking away richer. If it’s under, like it is now, XRP holders are bleeding.

This is the first time profitability has turned negative since mid-2025. And according to Glassnode, it looks a lot like what happened between September 2021 and May 2022, when the SOPR stayed under 1 and the market just dragged sideways for months.

Retail holders are dumping XRP while whales hold tight Right now, XRP’s price sits around $1.42, but whales’ wallets are quiet. Whale-to-exchange flow is still low, which means they’re not dumping. That’s important. It tells you that the selling is mostly coming from retail investors.

The same thing happened back in December 2025 and January 2026. SOPR was low, price kept dropping, but the big wallets stayed silent. It’s the smaller holders who are panicking.

Back in March and April 2025, whale flows were also quiet, and price stayed soft. Then in July, things suddenly bounced hard.

But when profit-taking kicked in, whales dumped fast. They waited for the top. That pattern matters now. Because the whales are still not selling. They’re waiting.

Even with the price sliding, XRP Ledger is still running big numbers. Messari’s data shows average daily transactions at 1.83 million in Q4 2025, up 3.1% from the quarter before. Active addresses dropped to 49,000.

But while payments fell 8.1% to around 909,000, offer creation rose to 42% of the entire mix. That means people are still trading and using the network, even with the loss pressure.

Ripple’s bigger plan is focused on tokenized real-world assets. It’s not about just DeFi numbers anymore. XRPL is being shaped to support tokenized cash, high-grade collateral, and real settlement flows. There’s been real growth here. RWA.xyz reported about $21.41 billion in represented value and nearly $23.87 billion distributed. The tokenized U.S. Treasuries value is now at $10.0 billion.

Ripple wants to pull more of that volume toward XRPL. The plan includes compliance tools built into the network and delivery-versus-payment support. That’s how they’re positioning themselves to handle the next wave of tokenization.

McKinsey expects tokenized markets to grow to $2 trillion by 2030, though BCG and ADDX threw out a much bigger number; $16.1 trillion.

TL;DR:

CME Group officially launched standard and micro futures contracts for Cardano (ADA) and Stellar (XLM).This expansion follows a record year where CME’s crypto asset notional volume surpassed $3 trillion.  These instruments allow hedge funds to access ADA and XLM within a CFTC-regulated environment. This Monday marked the launch of ADA and XLM futures on CME Group, representing a significant step for the financial derivatives market. With this addition, Cardano and Stellar now share the regulated stage with major cryptocurrencies such as Solana, Ethereum, and Bitcoin itself.

Following a historic 2025, where the platform’s notional volume reached unprecedented levels, the demand for new assets has continued to grow. Consequently, these contracts aim to satisfy the need for hedging and direct exposure among large-scale asset managers.

Structurally, the contracts include two versions—standard and micro—adapting to various investment strategies and risk management needs. For instance, ADA contracts are offered in sizes of 100,000 and 10,000 coins, while XLM units are available in 250,000 and 12,500.

Market Impact and Price Projections The fourth quarter for CME’s crypto segment was exceptional, averaging $30.7 billion in open interest. As a result, the inclusion of Stellar and Cardano is perceived as a natural catalyst to improve investor sentiment toward these mid-cap altcoins.

Currently, ADA remains in a consolidated range near $0.263, after facing key resistance at $0.32. However, the institutional visibility granted by the CME often precedes increased liquidity, which could help break the current sideways trend.

On the other hand, XLM is trading near $0.16 with contained volatility and tight volumes. Nevertheless, projection models suggest a potential advance toward the $0.18–$0.19 range if institutional support remains firm following this launch.

In summary, this move strengthens the infrastructure of digital assets, allowing institutional capital to flow more transparently. With regulated investment tools, the crypto ecosystem continues its journey toward irreversible financial maturity.

Episode 6 of Layer One, hosted by The Block's Kelvin Sparks and Hypha founder Steven Gates, was recorded with Ava Labs's VP of Business Development of Onchain Finance, Morgan Krupetsky, and VanEck's Head of Digital Asset Research Matthew Siegel.

Listen below, and subscribe to Layer One on YouTube, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts. Please send feedback and revision requests to [email protected].

In episode six of Layer One, The Block's Kelvin Sparks and Hypha Founder Steven Gates were joined by Ava Labs's VP of Business Development of Onchain Finance, Morgan Krupetsky, and VanEck's Head of Digital Asset Research Matthew Siegel. Together, the group discussed what actually drives institutional conviction in crypto.

Siegel explained why VanEck chose Avalanche for its first alt-L1 ETF, citing product-market fit, economic clarity, and an active BD team onboarding real institutions. The conversation covers DATs versus ETFs, the innovator's dilemma facing banks, and why market downturns are exactly when serious builders separate from tourists.

OUTLINE
00:00 - Introduction
03:30 - Institutional vs. Retail Investing
07:26 - Avalanche's L1 Scaling Vision
11:22 - What Made AVAX Investable for VanEck
14:00 - ETFs, DATs & Leveraged Products
19:24 - Crossing the TradFi-DeFi Chasm
29:34 - Surviving the Downturn: HODL Culture
34:30 - Matt's Wishlist for Avalanche
39:01 - RWA Penetration & Private Credit
46:30 - Banks vs. Stablecoins: Innovator's Dilemma

GUEST/HOST LINKS
Matthew Siegel - twitter.com/matthew_sigel
VanEck - twitter.com/vaneck_us
Morgan Krupetsky - twitter.com/MorganKrupetsky
Ava Labs - twitter.com/AvaLabs
Steven Gates - ⁠⁠⁠twitter.com/stvngts⁠⁠⁠
Kelvin Sparks - ⁠⁠⁠twitter.com/imyoungsparks⁠⁠⁠

The Block Newsletters
The Block's newsletters bring you the latest news and analysis of the fast-moving crypto and DeFi markets. To subscribe, visit theblock.co/newsletters

Are you hiring in crypto?
Use Campus to quickly find your best candidates with our challenging Crypto Assessment Test.
Faster hiring, stronger teams.

Sign up for a trial today: theblock.co/campus

Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Shiba Inu jumps 22% after OKX transfers 20.8 billion SHIB into cold storage, signaling possible supply shifts amid market fear.

Newton Gitonga2 min read

9 February 2026, 08:37 PM

Shiba Inu posted a strong weekend recovery as on-chain data highlighted a major exchange wallet shift during a volatile market phase. The move unfolded while broader crypto sentiment stayed locked in extreme fear. Despite that backdrop, SHIB showed relative resilience compared to other meme coins. Traders are now watching whether the exchange activity reflects a short-term structural adjustment or routine balance management.

OKX Wallet Transfer Coincides With SHIB Price RecoveryOn-chain data from Arkham showed that 20,841,045,129 SHIB tokens were transferred from OKX’s hot wallet into the exchange’s cold storage. The transaction removed tokens worth about $132,130 from active circulation. The timing drew attention because SHIB had just tested price levels not seen since early 2023. The move occurred during a sharp 30% drawdown from the week’s opening levels.

Following the transfer, Shiba Inu staged a swift rebound. The token rallied around 22% and reclaimed the $0.0000062 level. The signs of demand absorption during the recovery phase. Arkham data confirmed that the transfer was internal to OKX, pointing to exchange-controlled wallets rather than user withdrawals.

Such transfers often reflect reserve management decisions. However, the scale and timing raised questions among traders. Some suggested the move could relate to liquidity management during heightened volatility. Others pointed to possible order book restructuring as SHIB stabilized after heavy selling pressure.

Key Price Levels and Market DivergenceAt the time of writing, SHIB traded near $0.00000612 after failing to hold above the $0.0000068 level. The $0.0000046 was identified as a potential downside zone if bearish momentum returns. Despite the rebound, the broader crypto market continued to show signs of stress. Many altcoins and meme tokens recorded persistent outflows over the same period.

SHIB, however, showed a different on-chain pattern. While most meme coins saw tokens flow back onto exchanges, SHIB moved into cold storage. Such behavior is a form of supply adjustment. Locking tokens away can reduce immediate sell-side pressure, even if temporarily.

Still, observers cautioned against overinterpretation. Exchange wallet movements do not always signal a directional price shift. OKX has not issued a public explanation for the transfer. The move could represent routine operational management rather than a strategic stance on SHIB.

Even so, the transaction stood out due to its size and timing. With SHIB recovering quickly amid widespread fear, traders continue to monitor whether this wallet shift marks a meaningful change in the token’s short-term market structure or simply a coincidental exchange action.

ENRICH your inbox with our best storiesDon’t miss out and join our newsletter to get the latest,
well-curated news from the crypto world!

Newton Gitonga covers cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and digital finance. He specializes in breaking down complex trends with clear, data-driven reporting. His work focuses on market analysis, technical insights, and the evolving role of altcoins in shaping global markets.

Read more about

Latest Shiba Inu News Today (SHIB)

TL;DR

A survey reveals Nayib Bukele’s approval rating reaches 91.9%, solidifying his political standing. Only 2.2% of respondents identify Bitcoin as the government’s biggest failure, highlighting a disconnect from citizen priorities. Daily Bitcoin adoption remains low, but the government persists with its strategy, maintaining its daily BTC purchase. Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s popularity reaches a new high according to a recent survey from La Prensa Gráfica. The leader obtained 91.9% approval, a figure that consolidates his political position in the Central American nation. Of the 1,200 people consulted, nearly two-thirds expressed strong support for his administration, while barely 1.8% showed strong disapproval.

The numbers reflect a clear reality: Salvadoran citizens back Bukele, but not necessarily for his Bitcoin bet. The cryptocurrency, adopted as legal tender in 2021, occupies a marginal place among public concerns. Only 2.2% of respondents identified Bitcoin as the government’s biggest failure, a percentage that confirms the disconnect between official crypto policy and citizen priorities.

The president responded to the survey with his usual sarcastic tone on social media, mocking the reduced size of the opposition. The reaction shows the confidence Bukele maintains against his critics, backed by figures that few Latin American leaders can display.

Security explains the Bukele phenomenon The true driver of presidential popularity lies in public safety improvements. Since taking office in 2019, Bukele implemented drastic measures against the gangs that plagued the country. The construction of the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) represents the most visible face of the strategy. The prison, designed to house suspected organized crime members, forms part of a hard-line plan that considerably reduced homicide rates.

Salvadoran citizens report greater peace in their daily lives. Streets once controlled by criminal groups now allow free movement. Businesses operate without constant extortion. Families go out without the fear that characterized previous decades. The transformation of the security environment exceeded initial expectations and changed international perception about El Salvador.

For most Salvadorans, living without daily violence matters more than any economic or technological experiment. The contrast between global media attention to Bitcoin and local indifference proves revealing.

Bitcoin adoption by the population remained limited since implementation In a TIME interview during 2024, Bukele himself admitted that daily use of the cryptocurrency did not reach the levels projected by the government. Salvadorans prefer traditional payment methods for their everyday transactions. The International Monetary Fund warned about possible financial risks associated with the country’s crypto strategy.

Despite lukewarm public reception and international criticism, El Salvador does not retreat from its bet. Government officials confirmed that the country buys one Bitcoin daily since 2022, a commitment Bukele promised to maintain.

Online trackers linked to the national Bitcoin Office show constant increases in reserves, even after El Salvador agreed to moderate some cryptocurrency-related programs as part of a $1.4 billion IMF deal.

ETHZilla, backed by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, pivoted from a pure Ethereum treasury firm toward tokenization last year.

In brief Bitcoin miner Cango (CANG) sold 4,451 BTC or about $305 million worth this weekend. The firm used the proceeds to repay a BTC-backed loan and clean its balance sheet as it expands into AI. Shares are down around nearly 3% on the day, and 62% over the last six months. Publicly traded Bitcoin miner Cango (CANG) parted ways with 4,451 BTC this weekend, raising approximately $305 million as it aims to fuel its expansion into providing compute power for the artificial intelligence (AI) boom.

The firm used all of the proceeds to repay a portion of a Bitcoin-collateralized loan. 

“The company is executing a strategic pivot by utilizing its globally accessed, grid-connected infrastructure to provide distributed compute capacity for the AI industry,” Cango said in a statement. 

In addition to the sale, the firm also announced Jack Jin, formerly of video conferencing software firm Zoom, as its new CTO to help build out its AI business line. 

Shares in the Dallas-based mining firm are down nearly 3% following the news, recently changing hands below $0.95. Shares have fallen 62% in the last six months. 

While other publicly traded Bitcoin miners, like Bitfarms, have signaled a complete departure from mining, Cango intends to continue using resources to mine Bitcoin alongside its growing AI compute business.

“Cango remains committed to its mining operations, with a continued focus on enhancing mining economics and seeking an optimal balance between hashrate scale and operational efficiency,” the firm’s announcement reads. “The company will be guided by a disciplined framework for asset allocation in pursuit of long-term value creation.”

The firm, which says it operates over 40 sites across four distinct geographic regions, mined nearly 500 BTC in January, according to its most recent monthly production update. It also sold 550 BTC or about $39 million worth of BTC during the month, leaving it with 7,474.6 BTC or about $528 million worth at the close of January. 

At the time of the sale, Cango CEO Paul Yu telegraphed that the firm would be offloading more Bitcoin in the future.

“Starting this month, we will selectively sell a portion of newly mined Bitcoin to support the expansion of our inference platform and other near-term growth initiatives,” said Yu in a statement. “This tactical flexibility will allow us to seize new business opportunities and manage our liquidity with greater agility."

A representative for the firm did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment. 

Bitcoin is down around 0.2% in the last 24 hours, recently changing hands at $70,727. The top crypto asset is down nearly 10% in the last week and is 44% off its October all-time high of $126,080, though it has partially recovered since dipping to nearly $60,000 last week.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Journalist

Posted: February 10, 2026

Bitcoin traders have begun rebuilding upside expectations following last week’s sharp sell-off. Prediction market data shows a rebound in confidence even as spot price action and derivatives positioning remain cautious.

On Polymarket, traders are currently pricing a 61% probability that Bitcoin reaches $75,000 in February, up roughly 8 percentage points from recent lows. 

The shift follows a period of heightened volatility that saw Bitcoin briefly slide into the high-$60,000 range before stabilizing near $70,000.

Prediction markets signal recovering confidence The move higher in Polymarket odds reflects a reassessment of upside risk after the sell-off rather than a decisive change in trend. 

While a 61% probability indicates the outcome is favored, it also implies that a sizable portion of traders—nearly 40%—remain unconvinced that Bitcoin will clear the $75,000 level within the month.

Source: Polymarket

Trading activity on the contract has been active, with tens of millions of dollars in volume. It suggests the odds are responding quickly to price movements rather than drifting on thin liquidity.

Bitcoin spot price stabilizes, trend remains fragile Bitcoin’s spot price has rebounded modestly from recent lows and is hovering around $70,000–71,000, but the broader structure remains weak. 

Price is still trading below key moving averages, and the longer-term trend continues to slope lower following the January breakdown.

Source: TradingView

Volume spiked during the sell-off and eased during the rebound, a pattern typically associated with liquidation-led moves rather than renewed accumulation. While some dip buying has emerged near the lows, there is limited evidence so far of sustained follow-through.

Derivatives positioning stays defensive Derivatives data adds another layer of caution. According to Coinglass, the Bitcoin long/short ratio has remained tilted toward the short side, with aggressive sell orders dominating taker volume during and after the drop.

Notably, there has been no sustained surge in long positioning alongside the rebound in spot prices. 

Source: Coinglass

This suggests that while expectations have improved, traders have been hesitant to reintroduce leverage, preferring to wait for clearer confirmation from price action.

Expectations improve faster than Bitcoin positioning The data points to a market that has absorbed a volatility shock but has not yet transitioned back into a risk-on phase. 

Prediction markets are signaling renewed optimism around February upside, but spot trends and derivatives positioning indicate continued caution.

For now, Bitcoin is in a stabilization phase, with sentiment recovering more quickly than conviction across leveraged markets.

Final Thoughts Polymarket odds show recovering confidence after Bitcoin’s sell-off, but expectations remain far from unanimous. Spot price and derivatives data suggest stabilization rather than a confirmed return to upside momentum.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The Bitcoin market shrugged, but the conversation about quantum computers and Bitcoin popped back into feeds this week. It’s an old worry that keeps coming up: could future machines break the cryptography that protects wallets?

Based on reports from CoinShares and comments from long-time Bitcoin voices, the real story is less about an immediate panic and more about practical planning and who would actually be at risk.

Public Keys Expose A Small Slice Reports say that only 10,230 BTC sit in addresses where public keys are already visible, and that changes the math. Those coins would be the easiest targets if a powerful quantum machine appeared.

Around 7,000 BTC sit in mid-size wallets holding between 100 and 1,000 coins. About 3,230 BTC live in larger addresses holding between 1,000 and 10,000 coins.

At today’s values that stake is worth several hundred million dollars. That’s big money, but it’s not the same as a collapse of the protocol. An aggressive theft of that size would look like a heavy trade or a major security incident, not a network failure.

Quantum Hardware Still Falls Short According to experts, the algorithmic threat is straightforward: Shor’s algorithm would attack elliptic-curve signatures and Grover’s algorithm would weaken SHA-256 hashing.

But reports note a huge gap between experiment and attack. Current machines run at a little over 100 qubits in experimental setups. An effective break would need millions of stable, error-corrected qubits.

That kind of hardware has not been built. In short: the math shows a possible route, but the engineering is far from ready.

Old Coins, The Real Operational Headache Many of the more exposed addresses date back to Bitcoin’s early days and contain coins that have never moved. That makes them special. When those keys were first used, best practices were different.

Now, those same keys are a known point of weakness if quantum computing power ever arrives. Movement of those coins would be messy. Custodians, exchanges, and individual holders would all need to coordinate.

A technical fix could be proposed and adopted. The hard work would be getting people to update software and migrate keys before any real danger materializes. That is a logistics problem more than a cryptography puzzle.

BTCUSD trading at $69,054 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView Veteran Voices Call For Early Work According to Andreas Antonopoulos, a well-known Bitcoin and cryptocurrency expert, the threat is real but distant; he urges preparation rather than alarm.

British cryptographer Adam Back has said planning can happen in an orderly way, and panic is unnecessary so long as steps start now.

Those views line up: upgrade paths should be designed, wallets must discourage key reuse, and the community should test migration procedures.

If action is taken early, there’s ample room to make the shift without rushing or breaking systems.

Featured image from Crypto Valley Journal, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP reminds investors of the upcoming February 17, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired F5, Inc. (“F5” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: FFIV) securities between October 28, 2024 and October 27, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”).

IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR F5 INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.

What Happened?
On October 15, 2025, F5 disclosed that a “highly sophisticated nation-state threat actor had gained unauthorized access to certain Company systems” and “maintained long-term, persistent access to certain F5 systems, including the BIG-IP product development environment and engineering knowledge management platform.” Additionally, the Company stated that “[t]rough this access, certain files were exfiltrated, some of which contained certain portions of the Company’s BIG-IP source code and information about undisclosed vulnerabilities that it was working on in BIG-IP.”

On this news, F5’s stock price fell $35.40, or 10.7%, to close at $295.35 per share on October 16, 2025, thereby injuring investors.

Then, on October 27, 2025, after market hours, F5 released its fourth quarter fiscal 2025 financial results, providing low growth expectations for fiscal 2026 due primarily to the Security Breach, stating that the Company expected reductions to sales and renewals, elongated sales cycles, terminated projections, and increased expenses attributed to ongoing remediation efforts.

On this news, F5’s stock price fell $22.83, or 7.8%, to close at $267.58 per share on October 28, 2025, thereby injuring investors further.

What Is The Lawsuit About?
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) F5 was the subject of a significant security incident, placing its clientele’s security and the Company’s future prospects at significant risk; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired F5 securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than February 17, 2026 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:
If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:
Charles Linehan, Esq.,
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100,
Los Angeles California 90067
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150,
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at www.glancylaw.com.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.

If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.

To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contact Us:
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Charles Linehan
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at: www.glancylaw.com.

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all persons that purchased or otherwise acquired Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: INO) securities between October 10, 2023 and December 26, 2025. Inovio is a biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development, and commercialization of DNA medicines to treat and protect people from diseases associated with, inter alia, human papillomavirus (“HPV”).

Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) Misled Investors Regarding Approval for its CELLECTRA Device

Share For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003.

The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (INO) Misled Investors Regarding Approval for its CELLECTRA Device

According to the complaint, during the class period, defendant failed to disclose that: (i) manufacturing for Inovio’s CELLECTRA device was deficient; (ii) accordingly, Inovio was unlikely to submit the INO-3107 BLA to the FDA by the second half of 2024; (iii) Inovio had insufficient information to justify the INO-3107 BLA’s eligibility for FDA accelerated approval or priority review; and (iv) accordingly, INO-3107’s overall regulatory and commercial prospects were overstated.

Plaintiff alleges that on August 8, 2024, Inovio issued a press release reporting its financial results and recent business highlights for the second quarter of 2024, revealing that Inovio expected to submit the INO-3107 BLA to the FDA in mid-2025—representing an approximate full-year delay from defendants’ initially projected mid-2024 submission timeline—because of “a manufacturing issue” with a component of the CELLECTRA device. On this news, Inovio’s stock price fell $0.27 per share, or 3.1%, to close at $8.44 per share on August 9, 2024.

Then, on December 29, 2025, Inovio issued a press release announcing that the FDA had accepted the INO-3107 BLA on a standard rather than accelerated review timeline. Because the Company did not submit adequate information to justify eligibility for accelerated approval. Defendants further advised that Inovio does not plan to seek approval under the standard review timeline and would request a meeting with the FDA to discuss how it may still pursue accelerated approval. On this news, Inovio’s stock price fell $0.56 per share, or 24.45%, to close at $1.73 per share on December 29, 2025.

What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholders, who wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the class should contact Robbins LLP. The lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.

About Robbins LLP: A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002.

To be notified if a class action against Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

The Zacks Internet - Content industry participants are benefiting from solid demand for digital offerings, as well as the increasing importance of video content and cloud-based applications. The rapid deployment of AI, Generative AI and large language models is aiding industry players in enhancing the recommendation and search functions of their platforms, thereby improving user experience. Participants like RELX (RELX - Free Report) and Yelp (YELP - Free Report) are expanding their presence across social media, display and connected TV and search, driving top-line growth. However, the industry has been suffering from challenging macroeconomic conditions globally, which is having a detrimental effect on advertising spending, the primary revenue source for industry participants.

Industry Description The Zacks Internet - Content industry comprises providers of video encoding platforms, personal services, Internet content and information, staffing and outsourcing services, publishing, capital markets, media-based, home service, digital insights and measurement, stock photo, video and music licensing, and online travel companies. The industry is witnessing a rapid change in consumer behavior and ongoing digitalization. Advertising is a major revenue source for industry participants. Therefore, these companies are trying to expand their digital presence to win customers. They are also expanding their presence across social media, display and connected TV and search. Apart from the United States, a number of companies in this industry are located in Israel, the U.K., Germany, Russia and China.

3 Trends Shaping the Future of the Internet - Content Industry Demand for Digital Offerings Growing: The industry is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent product and service introductions, and evolving standards. An expanding range of mobile, digital and cloud-based offerings by industry participants is a major growth driver. The proliferation of smart devices and the increasing automation of the application development process bode well.

Industry Prospects Driven by Ad Spending Rate: Industry participants are focusing on marketing efforts to boost traffic to websites. Advertising and subscriptions are major revenue sources for these companies. The industry is dependent on consumer spending trends, making holiday spending a major deciding factor. However, macroeconomic challenges are expected to hurt ad spending in the near term.

Increasing Regulations Mar Prospects: Industry participants involved in online search and other social networking activities are increasingly facing regulatory pressure, particularly in China and the European Union (“EU”). The China government has a number of regulations related to direct advertising, which is a prime revenue source for these companies. The implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation in the EU adds to the concerns. Enactment of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) in the EU aims to prevent large online platforms that connect users with content, goods, information and services from abusing their market power. The DMA adds to the headwinds faced by Internet content providers in the EU.

Zacks Industry Rank Indicates Bullish Prospects The Zacks Internet - Content industry is housed within the broader Zacks Computer and Technology sector. It carries a Zacks Industry Rank #55, which places it in the top 23% of more than 250 Zacks industries.

The group’s Zacks Industry Rank, which is the average of the Zacks Rank of all the member stocks, indicates dim near-term prospects. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than two to one.

The industry’s position in the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries is a result of a positive earnings outlook for the constituent companies in aggregate. Looking at the aggregate earnings estimate revisions, it appears that analysts are optimistic about this group’s earnings growth potential. Since Nov. 30, 2025, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the industry’s 2026 earnings has moved up 4.1%.

Given the bullish industry outlook, there are a number of stocks worth following. But before we present the stocks that you may want to consider for your portfolio, let us take a look at the industry’s recent stock market performance and valuation.

Industry Lags S&P and Sector The Zacks Internet - Content industry has underperformed the broader Zacks Computer and Technology sector, as well as the S&P 500 composite, over the past year.

The industry has dropped 40.3% over this period compared with the S&P 500 sector’s appreciation of 16.8% and the 21.8% rise of the broader sector.

One-Year Price Performance

Industry's Current Valuation On the basis of the trailing 12-month price-to-sales ratio (P/S), which is a commonly used multiple for valuing Internet – Content stocks, we see that the industry is currently trading at 3.66X compared with the S&P 500’s 6.61X and the sector’s 8.32X.

Over the last five years, the industry has traded as high as 6.6X and as low as 3.33X, the median being 4.98X, as the charts below show.

Trailing 12-Month Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio

2 Internet Stocks to Buy RELX: This Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) company is benefiting from the ongoing shift in business mix toward higher growth analytics and decision tools that deliver enhanced value to its customers. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

Business Services, which represents roughly 40% of divisional revenues, is benefiting from strong growth in Financial Crime Compliance and Fraud & Identity solutions. RELX is also benefiting from strong Insurance solution business.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for RELX’s 2026 earnings has been steady at $1.95 per share over the past 30 days. RELX shares have declined 41.9% in the past year.

Price & Consensus: RELX

Yelp: This Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) stock is benefiting from higher ad spending, an increase in Paying Advertising Locations and an improvement in the non-term customer retention rate. YELP is witnessing an acceleration in consumer traffic across app-unique devices. A significant improvement in cumulative reviews is encouraging as well. Its sustained focus on expanding the product portfolio is likely to drive its revenues further.

Yelp's continued investment in AI and machine learning is expected to boost engagement and loyalty on its platform, contributing to sustained revenue growth.  The Zacks Consensus Estimate for YELP’s 2026 earnings has been steady at $2.39 per share over the past 30 days. Yelp shares have dropped 39.3% in the past year.

Price & Consensus: YELP

GraniteShares CEO and founder Will Rhind sits down with CNBC's MacKenzie Sigalos to discuss how the crypto volatility is shaping the innovation in the ETF landscape.

NEW YORK, Feb. 09, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Richtech Robotics Inc. (NASDAQ: RR) between January 27, 2026 and 12:00 PM ET on January 29, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026 in the securities class action first filed by the Firm.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Richtech Robotics securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Richtech Robotics class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51742 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 3, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Richtech claimed that it had a collaborative and commercial relationship with Microsoft when it did not; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Richtech’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Richtech Robotics class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51742 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of MSFT either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.