Market Signal Briefing

TLDR: Circle Nanopayments enables gas-free USDC transfers as small as $0.000001, built on Circle Gateway infrastructure. Batched on-chain settlement bundles thousands of transactions, with Circle covering all gas costs at the settlement layer. The x402-compatible system lets agents pay merchants instantly with no account creation or credit card required. A robot dog autonomously paid for its own recharging in USDC, marking a real-world agentic commerce milestone. Circle Nanopayments is now live on testnet, enabling gas-free USDC transfers as small as $0.000001. Built on Circle Gateway, the payments primitive is designed for the emerging agentic economy.

It allows developers to build pay-per-call APIs, real-time compute billing, and machine-to-machine payment flows.

Sub-cent transactions, previously unworkable due to high gas fees, are now economically viable at scale. Circle has introduced batch on-chain settlement to remove per-transaction costs entirely for developers.

How Circle Nanopayments Solves the Sub-Cent Problem Traditional payment rails, built decades ago, were not designed for high-frequency sub-cent transactions at agent scale. Fixed fees and overhead make ultra-small payments unworkable on legacy systems.

Even modern onchain transactions face barriers when settled individually. On low-cost blockchains, fees for a $0.0001 transfer can reach 1,000% to 5,000% of the payment amount.

Circle Nanopayments resolves this through off-chain aggregation and batched on-chain settlement. Thousands of transactions are bundled into a single onchain batch, reducing each transaction’s gas cost to zero.

Circle covers the on-chain costs at the settlement layer. This lets agents transact nearly instantly, with settlement handled seamlessly in the background.

When an agent initiates a payment, it signs an EIP-3009 authorization message and submits it to the API. The system validates the signature and adjusts the agent’s internal ledger balance accordingly.

The merchant then receives instant confirmation and can release goods or services right away. Actual onchain settlement occurs periodically and does not interrupt the workflow.

Circle announced the launch on X, noting the system follows the x402 standard. The x402 standard lets any agent pay any merchant without creating an account or adding a credit card.

AI agents are becoming economic actors.

Circle Nanopayments is live on testnet, enabling gas-free USDC transfers as small as $0.000001.

Built on Circle Gateway, Nanopayments allows developers to power:
→ Pay-per-call APIs
→ Real-time compute billing
→ Machine-to-machine…

— Circle (@circle) March 10, 2026

Circle stated: “The financial rail for the agentic economy is here.” This removes sign-up friction for agents operating across multiple autonomous workflows at once.

Real-World Testing and Supported Chains Circle Nanopayments was recently tested through a collaboration with OpenMind, an open-source robotics software developer. An autonomous robot dog used the system to pay for its own recharging in USDC.

The robot initiated payment, received near-instant confirmation, and continued operating while settlement ran in the background. This shows early-stage agentic commerce functioning effectively in a real environment.

As of February 2026, the payment system operates on the testnets of 12 blockchain networks. These include Arbitrum, Base, Ethereum, Polygon PoS, Avalanche, Optimism, Sei, Sonic, Unichain, HyperEVM, Arc, and World Chain.

It works on any Gateway-supported EVM chain, giving developers broad flexibility. Developers can check the official documentation for the most current list of supported networks.

Use cases for this payment primitive cover pay-per-crawl search, real-time compute billing, and autonomous service marketplaces.

Each model depends on the ability to transfer fractions of a cent instantly and without gas fees. The system allows developers to build products around true sub-cent value exchange. Previously, such business models were not economically practical at this scale.

Developers can access the testnet now to build and test sub-cent payment flows in live conditions. The testnet phase gives builders time to validate applications before any mainnet deployment takes place.

Circle has positioned this as core payments infrastructure for agentic commerce. Each payment carries programmable value with no per-transaction gas cost required from the developer.

Bitcoin has pushed back above roughly $70,000 after a weekend dump toward the mid‑60,000s that followed US‑Israel strikes on Iran and a spike in energy‑market stress.

What The Bitcoin Data Says This recovery comes after President Donald Trump helped reset risk sentiment when he signaled the Iran conflict could be resolved “very soon”, rising equities and softer oil prices alongside Bitcoin’s price. Brent crude dropped more than 7%, sliding to around $91 a barrel and pulling back sharply from Monday’s 119.50‑dollar peak.

“Trump’s latest posts are being seen as potentially flagging an end to the Iranian conflict faster than the market was anticipating”, said Richard Galvin, co-founder of hedge fund DACM as reported by Bloomberg. He added:

Risks are that the market is misreading Trump’s statements, or that either Israel, the USA or Iran takes action to further escalate hostilities and takes the option of de-escalation off the table.

On‑chain and derivatives data suggest the worst of the war‑driven stress is abating rather than starting a new bear phase. Glassnode describes the recovery as showing “tentative signs of improvement”, with futures open interest and perp buying picking up again as prices stabilize in the high-$60,000 to low‑$70,000 band.

What The Analysts Say Analysts tracking flows argue the Iran episode looks more like a sharp positioning and liquidity shock than a structural macro regime change. CryptoQuant data, cited by NewsBTC, showed a spike in coins moving to exchanges and a jump in volatility around the February 28 strikes, followed by a rapid normalization as BTC snapped back toward its prior trajectory in early March.

ETF flows remain a key pillar. US spot products saw strong net inflows in the days Bitcoin rebounded toward and above $70,000, signaling that institutions kept buying into weakness rather than dumping exposure. At the same time, funding and short liquidations indicate that late bears were squeezed as prices reclaimed key psychological levels, reinforcing the idea that traders used the war headlines to fade fear rather than to exit the asset class altogether.

The “Digital Gold” And Risk Asset Behavior This is not the first time war headlines have jolted Bitcoin, but recent behavior looks different from the panic surrounding events like the start of the Russia‑Ukraine war. On earlier Iran‑linked shocks, BTC saw larger percentage drawdowns and sustained realized‑volatility spikes; this time, the coin briefly dumped toward the low‑60,000s before clawing back above 70,000 dollars within days.

Some macro and on‑chain analysts say that pattern supports a slowly maturing “digital gold” narrative, noting that Bitcoin held up better than some equities and even certain traditional hedges during the latest energy shock. Others stress that crypto is still trading as a high‑beta risk asset overall, pointing to synchronous moves with stocks when war jitters first hit and to heavy rotation into classic safe havens like gold at peak fear.

Whatever the case may be for overall crypto sentiment, one thing remains true: the market still moves at the speed of human fear around geopolitical unrest, not the other way around.

BTC's price trends to the upside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

In brief Ripple plans to secure an Australian Financial Services License by acquiring BC Payments. APAC payments volume nearly doubled in 2025, with several Australian firms already using the platform. Expansion raises questions about blockchain settlement inside regulated banking systems. Ripple said Tuesday it is seeking an Australian Financial Services License through the acquisition of BC Payments, a move that would place the crypto firm within Australia’s regulated financial services framework.

The license will allow Ripple to oversee settlement, connect customers with local payout partners, and route transactions through a single integration rather than multiple intermediaries.

“Australia is a key market for Ripple,” and the license will help strengthen its  “ability to scale,” Fiona Murray, managing director for Asia Pacific at Ripple, said in a statement.

Its payments platform will also manage the full cycle of cross-border transactions, including onboarding, compliance, funding, foreign exchange, liquidity management, and final payout, while connecting traditional banking rails to digital assets.

If approved, it would also expand Ripple’s regulated footprint in Asia-Pacific and add to the company’s more than 75 regulatory licences worldwide.

Ripple said its APAC payments volume nearly doubled year-over-year in 2025 and that it already works with Australian firms, including Hai Ha Money Transfer, Stables, law firm Caleb & Brown, Flash Payments, and crypto exchange Independent Reserve.

But even with that growth, the expansion raises a broader question for the sector over whether blockchain-based settlement will appear directly in regulated payment flows or remain behind existing banking and correspondent networks.

Game changer?Local observers say the license could help crypto payment infrastructure gain traction in regulated finance, though adoption will depend on regulation, competition, and clear advantages over existing rails.

The license is a “game changer” and “a possible template of how crypto could enter mainstream usage,” Kartik Swaminathan, lead contributor at crypto fintech firm Demether, told Decrypt.

While it brings legitimacy, how the Treasury and Australian Securities and Investments Commission view crypto may be “slow to evolve and crystallize into clear processes for Ripple to follow,” Swaminathan said.

“Consumers are agnostic to tech, so new products need to be faster and or cheaper to win,” he said. “While Ripple has the tech, competition from multiple Australian stablecoin offerings is emerging. Distribution may well decide the winner.”

Securing an AFSL matters because “it gives crypto payments a better shot at competing where traditional rails remain weakest: cross-border settlement, treasury movement and global liquidity orchestration,” Joshua Murchie, founder of investment firm Sympatheia, told Decrypt.

“It does not replace Australia’s domestic payment infrastructure tomorrow, because the country already has strong local rails,” Murchie said. “But it does strengthen the case for regulated blockchain-based payment infrastructure as a serious institutional alternative in higher-friction parts of the market.”

For Australian consumers, the main risk could be “confusion around protections,” Jonathan Inglis, CEO of Melbourne-based consumer research firm Protocol Theory, told Decrypt.

The license could “accelerate the integration of crypto-based payment rails into mainstream finance,” with 35% of adults in the country saying they would be interested in crypto trading through their main bank, Inglis said.

At the same time, Inglis noted that 47% of Australians who do not currently use crypto say “better education would increase their willingness to engage,” which suggests that “potential users still lack a clear understanding of the products entering the financial system.”

Friction remains between crypto services and banks, with 12% of Australian crypto users reporting banking restrictions, compared with 8% of the general population, according to Protocol Theory data.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Arthur Hayes Bitcoin outlook is once again drawing attention across the crypto market after the former derivatives exchange executive revealed that he is currently sitting on the sidelines despite maintaining a long-term bullish view on the asset.

Speaking during a recent appearance on the Coin Stories podcast published on YouTube Tuesday, Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, said he would not invest in Bitcoin at current conditions.

“If I had $1 to invest right now, would I be putting it into Bitcoin? No. I would wait,” Hayes said.

The comment stands in contrast to his widely discussed prediction that Bitcoin could reach $250,000 by 2026, highlighting the difference between long-term conviction and short-term macro uncertainty.

Bitcoin Price Context At the time of his remarks, Bitcoin was trading around $69,926, according to market data. That level places the asset roughly 45% below its October all-time high of $126,000.

The market remains sensitive to geopolitical developments, particularly the escalating tensions involving the United States and Iran.

Hayes believes the outcome of that conflict could play a decisive role in determining Bitcoin’s next major move.

War Alone May Not Boost Bitcoin While some investors argue that geopolitical conflict naturally benefits decentralized assets, Hayes offered a more nuanced interpretation.

According to him, the key catalyst is not war itself but how governments finance it.

“Money printing is good for Bitcoin,” Hayes said, explaining that the cryptocurrency historically responds strongly when central banks expand liquidity.

That dynamic places the focus squarely on the actions of the Federal Reserve rather than the conflict headlines themselves.

Waiting for Monetary Easing Hayes indicated he plans to begin accumulating Bitcoin only when the Federal Reserve shifts toward looser monetary policy.

Specifically, he expects that prolonged geopolitical tension could eventually force policymakers to inject liquidity into the financial system to support government spending.

“The longer this conflict goes on, the higher the likelihood that the Fed has to print money to support the American war machine,” he said.

If central banks begin easing again, Hayes believes Bitcoin could benefit from the resulting expansion in global liquidity.

Risk of Further Downside Despite his long-term optimism, Hayes acknowledged the possibility of additional volatility in the near term.

He suggested that ongoing geopolitical stress could trigger a broader risk-off event across global markets.

In that scenario, both equities and cryptocurrencies could face selling pressure. Hayes noted Bitcoin might even drop below $60,000, which could lead to cascading liquidations across leveraged positions.

Bitcoin briefly approached the $60,000 level on Feb. 6 before recovering into a modest upward trend.

Analysts Divided on the Short-Term Outlook Not everyone in the market shares Hayes’ cautious stance.

Crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe recently highlighted the positive impact of a strong surge in the Nasdaq, suggesting broader market momentum could lift both Bitcoin and altcoins.

According to van de Poppe, macro indicators are increasingly supportive of digital assets in the near term.

The contrast between these perspectives reflects a broader split among investors between macro-focused caution and equity-driven optimism.

Investor Psychology in a Macro Cycle The debate underscores how closely Bitcoin now tracks global financial conditions.

During earlier cycles, crypto markets were often driven by internal developments such as exchange launches or new blockchain projects.

Today, however, many traders watch central bank policy and liquidity trends just as closely as on-chain data.

For macro-focused investors like Hayes, the timing of Federal Reserve policy shifts may matter more than short-term price fluctuations.

Long-Term Conviction Remains Despite his current hesitation, Hayes emphasized that he remains structurally bullish on Bitcoin.

He argued that the window during which the asset trades below $100,000 may not last many more years.

That perspective aligns with a broader belief among long-term crypto investors that Bitcoin’s scarcity and adoption trends will eventually outweigh short-term macro headwinds.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are volatile and risky. Always conduct your research before making any investment decisions

Stablecoin issuer Circle (NYSE:CRCL) has announced a major expansion for its flagship products, making native USDC and its Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP) officially available on EDGE Chain as of March 9, 2026. This integration delivers a fully regulated, dollar-backed stablecoin directly into one of the most promising high-performance blockchain ecosystems, along with seamless cross-chain capabilities that eliminate reliance on wrapped or bridged assets.

EDGE Chain forms the backbone of edgeX, a perpetual decentralized exchange (DEX) engineered for trading experiences that rival centralized platforms in speed and responsiveness.

The chain leverages Arbitrum for robust security while settling transactions on Ethereum layer-1, creating an ideal environment for intensive DeFi applications.

Circle Ventures has backed the edgeX team, signaling belief in the platform’s long-term role as a hub for USDC-native tools in perpetuals trading, lending, and beyond.

Previously, EDGE Chain relied on bridged USDC (labeled USDC.e) issued through Alchemy.

Now, developers and users can tap into authentic native USDC as the primary collateral and settlement asset.

This shift supports institutional-grade operations, including margin collateral for perpetual contracts and efficient dollar-denominated trading flows.

The teams behind EDGE Chain and edgeX are coordinating a gradual migration of existing USDC.e liquidity to the native version, with clear labeling maintained in explorers, apps, and documentation to ensure transparency throughout the transition.

At the core of the update is Circle CCTP, which enables secure, capital-efficient movement of USDC between EDGE Chain and other supported networks.

Users and builders gain flexibility through two transfer modes—standard for reliability or fast for time-sensitive needs—opening doors to cross-chain onboarding, margin management, trading, and lending without liquidity fragmentation.

This native setup positions EDGE Chain as a venue for continuous on-chain financial activity backed by the world’s largest regulated stablecoin.

Users benefit from USDC’s 1:1 redeemability for US dollars through Circle’s compliant processes, including direct redemptions under frameworks like MiCAR.

Eligible institutions can access fiat on- and off-ramps via Circle Mint, while developers can integrate these tools to create sophisticated applications that prioritize speed, security, and interoperability.

The broader ecosystem gains from enhanced reliability, reduced bridging risks, and new opportunities for high-volume DeFi use cases.

Token details are now public for easy adoption: the native USDC contract address on mainnet is 0x98d2919b9A214E6Fa5384AC81E6864bA686Ad74c, with a corresponding testnet address available for development.

Bridged USDC.e remains supported but distinctly identified during the migration period.

This rollout reflects Circle’s ongoing commitment to embedding regulated digital dollars deeper into innovative blockchain infrastructure.

By combining native USDC’s stability with CCTP’s connectivity on a performance-focused chain like EDGE, the update paves the way for more accessible, efficient, and trusted DeFi experiences.

Traders, builders, and institutions exploring perpetual markets now have powerful new tools at their disposal to operate in a maturing digital asset landscape.

Businesses seeking direct integration can apply for Circle Mint access, while individuals can discover USDC options through established providers. As digital finance matures, initiatives like this underscore how regulated stablecoins are becoming essential infrastructure for cross-chain economies.

, /PRNewswire/ -- The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) securities between April 22, 2025 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until Monday, April 20, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Enphase Energy class action lawsuit.  Captioned Tripathi v. Enphase Energy, Inc., No. 26-cv-01380 (N.D. Cal.), the Enphase Energy class action lawsuit charges Enphase Energy and certain of Enphase Energy's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Enphase Energy class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-enphase-class-action-lawsuit-enph.html

You can also contact attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected].

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Enphase Energy, together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, and sells home energy solutions for the solar photovoltaic industry.

The Enphase Energy class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Enphase Energy overstated its ability to manage its channel inventory; (ii) Enphase Energy overstated its ability to mitigate effects arising from the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 25D (the "25D Credit"); and (iii) accordingly, Enphase Energy overstated its financial and operational prospects.

The Enphase Energy class action lawsuit further alleges that on October 28, 2025, Enphase Energy reported its financial results for the third quarter of 2025, disclosing that it expected elevated channel inventory to result in lower battery storage shipments in the fourth quarter of 2025, and that the expiration of the 25D Credit would negatively impact revenues for the first quarter of 2026.  On this news, the price of Enphase Energy stock fell more than 15%, according to the complaint.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Enphase Energy securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Enphase Energy class action lawsuit.  A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class.  A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Enphase Energy investor class action lawsuit.  The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Enphase Energy shareholder class action lawsuit.  An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Enphase Energy class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation.  Our Firm ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report, recovering more than $916 million for investors in 2025.  This marks our fourth #1 ranking in the past five years.  And in those five years alone, Robbins Geller recovered $8.4 billion for investors – $3.4 billion more than any other law firm.  With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig.  Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. 

Contact:
     Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
     J.C. Sanchez
     655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
     800-449-4900
     [email protected]

SOURCE Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP

It's been a rough start to 2026 for QuantumScape (QS +0.44%). The stock is down over 30% year to date and more than 60% from its 52-week high. For growth-minded investors, the question is whether this significant dip presents a compelling buying opportunity or signals a warning to run the other way.

The answer will likely depend on QuantumScape's upcoming milestones, which should arrive before 2027. So is its lower price a trap or an opportunity?

A technological edge QuantumScape focuses on solid-state lithium-metal battery technology. The company's stated goal is to create batteries that enable greater energy density, faster charging, and enhanced safety, all while supporting a lower-carbon future.

It has progressed to field testing, where its QSE-5 B-sample cells are hopefully living up to expectations. The company's Eagle Line pilot production equipment is also being installed on time. This introduction represents a significant leap into future commercial viability.

Image source: Getty Images.

Losses are adding up, but liquidity is strong QuantumScape ended last year with $911 million in total liquidity, which means the company's runway is strong even as losses mount. For the full year 2025, the net loss reached $435 million with no real revenue. Share dilution is also a concern.

Today's Change

(

0.44

%) $

0.03

Current Price

$

6.83

Its liquidity position should be enough to weather the storms on the path to full production, but the company needs to begin generating real revenue fairly soon, or investors may jump ship.

The battery market is charging up The company's burn rate is, fortunately, overshadowed by the huge opportunity at hand. The solid-state battery market is expected to have a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 56% or more through the early 2030s. If QuantumScape can stay on its timeline to be production-ready by the end of 2026, then revenue should be meaningful heading into 2027.

The company is near an inflection point It's a waiting game right now for QuantumScape's investors. The company needs its field tests with its partner PowerCo -- owned by Volkswagen -- to demonstrate that its batteries meet expectations and are production-ready.

The company is still years away from profitability, but the inflection point is near, and the results of the field testing will make or break this stock. This stock is still a high-risk speculative investment.

After the field test results are released, early investors will either rejoice or be forced to reevaluate their positions. Buying the dip now isn't buying on fundamentals; it is buying on the belief that QuantumScape's batteries will live up to the hype.

If we're assuming a best-case bull scenario, then the stock is inexpensive and undervalued. Investors who take a position in it should anticipate high volatility.

The company's beta is 2.6, with 1.0 meaning it moves in tandem with the overall market. Ultimately, if QuantumScape's technology is ready for prime time, buying the dip now is more than advantageous.

March 10, 2026 21:14 ET  | Source: Transcontinental Inc.

MONTREAL, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Transcontinental Inc. (TSX: TCL.A TCL.B) ("TC Transcontinental" or the "Corporation") is pleased to announce that, in connection with the closing of the sale of the Corporation’s Packaging Sector to ProAmpac Holdings Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, as previously announced on March 6, 2026, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has authorized a special cash distribution of $20.00 (the “Distribution”) per Class A Subordinate Voting Share (the "Class A Shares") and Class B Share (the "Class B Shares"), to be effected by: (i) a reduction of stated capital of approximately $7.00 per Class A Share, and (ii) a cash dividend for the balance of the Distribution. The Distribution will be payable on Friday, March 20, 2026 (the “Payment Date”), to shareholders of record holding Class A Shares and Class B Shares as of March 18, 2026 (the “Record Date”).

As the amount of the Distribution exceeds 25% of the Class A Share and Class B Share prices, the Toronto Stock Exchange requires that the Class A Shares and the Class B Shares trade on a "due bill" basis from the opening of trading on the Record Date until the close of trading on the Payment Date. During this period, sellers of Class A Shares and Class B Shares will transfer to purchasers both the Class A Shares and the Class B Shares and the entitlement to the Distribution.

For trading purposes, due bills will attach to the Class A Shares and the Class B Shares from the opening of business on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, being the Record Date, until the close of business on the Payment Date being Friday, March 20, 2026, so that the shares will carry the value of the Distribution until the Distribution has been paid. The Class A Shares and Class B Shares will commence trading on an “ex-distribution” basis on Monday, March 23, 2026, as of which date purchasers of the shares will no longer have an attaching entitlement to payment of the Distribution. The due bill redemption date will be Monday, March 23, 2026.

Forward-looking statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements which are based on the expectations of management and inherently subject to a certain number of risks and uncertainties, known and unknown. By their very nature, forward-looking statements are derived from both general and specific assumptions. Forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to the anticipated amount of the Distribution and the timing thereof, including the Record Date, Payment Date and ex-distribution date and the expected due bill trading period and redemption date.

The Corporation disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking statements except as required by law.

About TC Transcontinental

Founded 50 years ago and 4,000 employees strong, Transcontinental Inc. (TSX: TCL.A TCL.B), known under the TC Transcontinental brand, is a Canadian retail marketing services company, Canada's largest printer, and the Canadian leader in French-language educational publishing. Driven by the vision of a more informed, educated and prosperous society, TC Transcontinental propels its clients' success across the retail, education, book and information industries. With agility, creativity and boldness, we design and deliver innovative, high-value products and services. 

The Corporation's revenues from continuing operations were $1.1 billion for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2025. Until the sale of its Packaging Sector to ProAmpac, which was completed on March 6, 2026, the Corporation was also a North American leader in flexible packaging with approximately 3,600 employees, and revenues from the Corporation's discontinued operations were $1.6 billion for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2025. For more information, please visit www.tc.tc.

8.13K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

TARRYTOWN, N.Y. and WASHINGTON, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) and Society for Science (the Society) announced that Connor Hill, 17, of State College, Pennsylvania, won the top award of $250,000 in the 2026 Regeneron Science Talent Search (STS), the U.S.’s oldest and most prestigious science and math competition for high school seniors.

Key Takeaways:

This year marks the 85th anniversary of the Science Talent Search and Regeneron’s 10th year as the title sponsor; Regeneron is extending its title sponsorship through 2036, pledging $150 million to fuel the next generation of science and technology leaders.
Forty finalists were honored at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C., receiving more than $1.8 million in awards recognizing groundbreaking research, exceptional analytical rigor, exceptional problem-solving skills and potential to shape the future of STEM. Top Three Winners:Connor Hill, 17, of State College, Pennsylvania won first place and $250,000 for discovering a way to identify all the possible "noble polyhedra," highly symmetric shapes with flat sides and straight edges. He wrote a computer program to do the computations and proved there are two infinite families of noble polyhedra, as well as 146 isolated examples.Second place and $175,000 went to Edward Kang, 17, of Hackensack, New Jersey for using retinal images to train AI models on subtle patterns linked to autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to create a screening tool called RetinaMind. He also created retinal cell models to study gene changes that may help explain why these differences occur.Third place and $150,000 went to Iris Shen, 17, of The Woodlands, Texas, for testing a potential cancer drug in clams to see if they could serve as an animal model for blood cancer drug discovery. In the clams, the drug had a similar effect to what researchers observe in human cells. She also tested a mix of other potential cancer drugs, which slowed the clams' tumor growth. "Congratulations to the winners of this year's Regeneron Science Talent Search," said Maya Ajmera, President and CEO, Society for Science and Executive Publisher, Science News. “Their bold vision and perseverance reveal what the next generation of problem solvers truly looks like—and why our future is in capable hands. Their creativity, ambition and courage to confront the world’s toughest challenges are exactly what this moment demands.”

The Regeneron Science Talent Search is committed to providing a national platform for high school seniors to showcase original, innovative STEM research that proposes novel solutions to real-world issues. Finalists are evaluated for their scientific rigor, originality, critical thinking, leadership potential, and commitment to creating meaningful impact in crucial STEM fields.

“Congratulations to the winners of the 2026 Regeneron Science Talent Search, and to all the finalists who participated in this year’s competition. These students represent exactly the kind of extraordinary talent scientific progress depends on,” said George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D., co-Founder, Board co-Chairman, President and Chief Scientific Officer of Regeneron and a 1976 Science Talent Search winner. “From my own experience as a Science Talent Search winner, I know the transformative power of this competition. That’s why Regeneron is deepening our commitment and extending our title sponsorship for another decade. Through our support of Science Talent Search and our title sponsorship of the Regeneron International Science Fair, the world’s largest high school science competition, we will invest more than $300 million from 2017 to 2036. We may never know where the next great scientific leader will come from, but we do know it’s our responsibility to find that talent, fuel it, and give it every chance to change the world.”

Other top honors from the competition include:

Fourth Place and $100,000: Rachel Chen, 18, of Los Angeles, California for developing a concrete, visual way to describe systems of many quantum particles using Temperley-Lieb diagrams, expanding on a 1997 finding. Rachel illustrated how a magnetic field influences the entire quantum system using these simple point-and-line diagrams.
Fifth Place and $90,000: Jerry Xu, 17, of Lexington, Massachusetts for building an AI program that compresses the features of protein molecules into strings of numbers. He showed that his model enabled a more efficient comparison of protein structure without the loss of important features. This could speed up genetic research and drug discovery.
Sixth Place and $80,000: Leanne Fan, 18, of San Diego, California for building a device to simulate microgravity in order to study how wounds heal in space. With the device, she tested red light on injured flatworms and found that it sped up tissue regeneration by 95.2%. She also found that red light treatment speeds up wound repair in human models in normal gravity.
Seventh Place and $70,000: Claire Jiang, 18, of Wyckoff, New Jersey for developing a cellular model of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). She treated cells used to study rheumatoid arthritis with bone morphogenetic protein 4, a protein linked to JIA joint damage. Her experiments showed they acted like JIA cells in their growth and gene expression.Eighth Place and $60,000: Leon Wang, 17, of Stamford, Connecticut, for finding two FDA-approved drugs that may also be effective against Alzheimer's disease. Both drugs reduce the activity of a cellular signaling pathway linked to an Alzheimer's gene. In lab-grown brain cells, the drugs reduced signs of damage due to the pathway.Ninth Place and $50,000: Jonathan Du, 18, of Mountain View, California for investigating the unrestricted finite factorization property. Factorization breaks down mathematical objects into simpler parts. Jonathan's work explores complicated algebraic systems where some elements have several factorizations, and others do not factor at all.Tenth Place and $40,000: Seth Nabat, 18, of Winnetka, California for building a machine learning program to quickly and accurately track particle collisions without sacrificing accuracy by favoring symmetry. Seth's program uses an unconstrained network to catch errors, and another network to find patterns in them.Colin Jie Chu, 18, of Palo Alto, California was named the Seaborg Award winner and selected to speak on behalf of the Regeneron Science Talent Search Class of 2026. The 40 finalists chose Colin as the person who best exemplifies their class and the legacy of nuclear chemist Glenn T. Seaborg, who won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1951 and served on the Society’s Board of Trustees for 30 years.The remaining 30 finalists received $25,000 each. In total, Regeneron awarded $3.1 million in awards, including $2,000 to each top scholar and their school. Since the start of Regeneron’s sponsorship in 2017 through this year’s competition, Regeneron and the Society have engaged and inspired more than 20,000 of the nation’s top young scientists, recognized 3,000 as Regeneron scholars, and awarded over $31 million in prizes. Resources:

2026 Winner Media Kit (photos, bios, research summaries, b-roll, video)Virtual Project Showcase (All 40 finalist projects)Full List of 40 FinalistsTop 300 ScholarsNotable STS Alumni What is the Regeneron Science Talent Search?

The Regeneron Science Talent Search, a program of Society for Science since 1942, is the United States’ oldest and most prestigious science and math competition for high school seniors. This year, more than 2,600 students submitted original research in critical scientific fields and were judged by leading experts. Unique among high school competitions in the U.S. and globally, the Regeneron Science Talent Search identifies and supports the U.S.’s most promising future leaders in science as they develop innovative solutions to solve significant global challenges through rigorous research and discoveries. The program provides students with a national stage to present new ideas and challenge conventional ways of thinking.

For over eight decades, the Science Talent Search has rewarded talented high school seniors who dedicate countless hours to original research projects and present their results in rigorous reports that resemble graduate school theses. Collectively, STS alumni have received millions of dollars in scholarships and gone on to be awarded Nobel Prizes, Fields Medals, MacArthur Fellowships and numerous other accolades.

What is Regeneron’s role?

For Regeneron, the Science Talent Search is a deeply personal commitment, as its co-Founders George D. Yancopoulos, M.D., Ph.D. and Leonard S. Schleifer, M.D., Ph.D. began their scientific careers as Science Talent Search participants. In 2017, Regeneron became the third long-term sponsor of the Science Talent Search, succeeding Westinghouse and Intel, with a 10-year, $100 million commitment to help reward and celebrate the best and brightest young minds. Since the beginning of this enduring sponsorship, through this year’s Science Talent Search, Regeneron and the Society have engaged and inspired more than 20,000 of the nation’s top young scientists, recognized 3,000 as Regeneron Scholars, and awarded over $31 million in prizes. In February 2026, the company renewed its sponsorship for another decade, increasing its investment by 50%, pledging an additional $150 million. Regeneron is also the title sponsor of the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF), a program of the Society and the world’s largest high school science competition. Regeneron’s support for these two premier programs totals more than $300 million from 2017 to 2036.

Learn more at https://www.societyforscience.org/regeneron-sts/ or www.regeneron.com/STEM

What is Society for Science?

Society for Science is a champion for science, dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of science and the vital role it plays in human advancement. Established in 1921, Society for Science is best known for its award-winning journalism through Science News and Science News Explores, its world-class science research competitions for students, including the Regeneron Science Talent Search, the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair and the Thermo Fisher Scientific Junior Innovators Challenge, and its STEM Outreach programming that seeks to ensure that all students have an opportunity to pursue a career in STEM. A 501(c)(3) membership organization, Society for Science is committed to inform, educate and inspire.

Learn more at www.societyforscience.org and follow us on Facebook, X, Instagram, and LinkedIn.

What is Regeneron?

Regeneron (NASDAQ: REGN) is a leading biotechnology company that invents, develops, and commercializes potentially life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases. Founded and led by physician-scientists, our unique ability to repeatedly and consistently translate science into medicine has led to numerous approved treatments and product candidates in development, most of which were homegrown in our laboratories. Our medicines and pipeline are designed to help patients with eye diseases, allergic and inflammatory diseases, cancer, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, hematologic conditions, infectious diseases, and rare diseases.

Regeneron believes that operating as a good corporate citizen is crucial to delivering on our mission. We approach corporate responsibility with three goals in mind: to improve the lives of people with serious diseases, to foster a culture of integrity and excellence, and to build sustainable communities. Our most significant philanthropic investments are in science education, a commitment we call STEM-Fueled™ – our collection of programs and partnerships, including the Regeneron Science Talent Search (STS) and the Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair (ISEF), that fuel future scientific innovators to pursue bold ideas and advance world-changing solutions. Throughout the year, Regeneron empowers and supports employees to give back through our volunteering, pro bono, and matching gift programs. We are proud to be recognized on the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and the Civic 50 list of the most “community-minded” companies in the United States.

For more information, please visit www.Regeneron.com or follow Regeneron on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook or X.

Media Contacts:
Tina Parisi Tuttle, Regeneron
973-975-9357, [email protected]

Gayle Kansagor, Society for Science 
703-489-1131, [email protected]

March 10, 2026 21:50 ET  | Source: YZi Labs

Believes that Thomas’ Belated SEC Filings Are Not a Cure – But Rather an Admission of a Systemic Breakdown in BNC’s Internal Controls

Reiterates Demand for Full Disclosure of Potential 10X Group – Including Identity of "Certain Members of 10X BNB Cayman Sponsor and Third-Parties"

Believes a Board that Cannot Ensure Basic Section 16 Compliance Has No Credibility with Investors

ROAD TOWN, British Virgin Islands, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --  YZILabs Management Ltd. (“YZi Labs” or “YZi”), a significant stockholder of CEA Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: BNC) (“BNC” or the “Company”), today issued the following statement regarding recent Section 16 filings by Hans Thomas, a director of BNC and the Founding Partner of 10X Capital Asset Management LLC (“10X”), BNC’s asset manager.

After weeks of public pressure and repeated calls by YZi Labs for basic compliance with federal securities laws, Mr. Thomas has finally filed his long-overdue Form 3 and Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These filings confirm what stockholders have been forced to infer from fragments and arithmetic in prior disclosures: material ownership interests, warrant transfers, and warrant exercises connected to 10X-linked entities occurred throughout 2025 and were not reported on a timely basis as required under federal securities law.

However, these late filings only partially fill the transparency gap and raise serious new questions and heighten concerns that 10X and affiliated persons may have formed an undisclosed “group” under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act.

1. Belated Filings Are Not a Cure – They Are an Admission of a Systemic Compliance Breakdown

Mr. Thomas’ initial Form 3 lists an event date of August 5, 2025, yet it was not filed until March 2, 20261 – an astounding 199 days (or 6.5 months) after the deadline to file the Form 3. His Form 4 reports transactions dated September 22, 2025, October 1, 2025, October 8, 2025, and December 3, 20252 – all inexplicably filed well after their respective two-business-day deadlines. The Company’s persistent inability to ensure timely Section 16 compliance by its own directors is alarming. Who, if anyone, at the Company is aware of reporting obligations and is ensuring the Company and its directors maintain basic compliance? In our view, these late filings reflect a clear collapse of the basic internal controls and compliance protocols that public company investors expect and should be able to take for granted.

2. Why is 10X Capital Quietly Reducing and Dispersing its Position?

The filings show 10X Capital Partners LLC reduced its Asset Manager Warrant position through transfers to one or more unnamed “third-party/ies,” leaving 10X with a materially smaller position.3

If 10X’s ownership and influence are truly benign and fully disclosed, stockholders deserve a straightforward explanation. Why is the architect of the Company's 20-year Asset Management Agreement quietly reducing and redistributing its exposure while keeping the Company trapped in a punitive contract?

3. Vague References to “Third-Parties” Are Not Transparency – This is Camouflage

The filings further state that 10X BNB Cayman Sponsor transferred all of its Strategic Advisor Warrants to “certain members... and third-parties,” and that it no longer beneficially owns any such warrants following the transfers, including roughly one-third of which that were transferred to and exercised by 10X LLC.4 This phrasing is precisely the kind of vague, legally sanitized disclosure that invites obvious scrutiny: were these transfers made to independent, arm’s-length recipients or to friendly hands acting in concert?

These new Section 16 filings do not disprove coordinated action by 10X; they provide further evidence of ownership movements that stockholders were entitled to understand in real time, not a half-year later. The question is no longer whether there was activity; the question is why stockholders were kept in the dark about who held what, when, and under what coordinated arrangements.

4. Lack of Credibility Increases the Need for Confirmation of Any Potential “Shadow” Group

Given Mr. Thomas’ and 10X’s repeated history of flouting securities law obligations, we have, and believe other investors should have, no faith in the veracity or completeness of these late filings. If 10X and its affiliates wish to argue that 10X’s just-disclosed coordinated dispersal is why no Schedule 13D filing is required, we contend that they must immediately publicly confirm the following items to give investors assurances that they are truly fulfilling their disclosure obligations:

The Identities and Relationships: Confirm whether any other assignee of the Strategic Advisor Warrants or the Asset Manager Warrants are affiliates, associates, members, partners, or employees of 10X or any of its related entities, or parties acting in concert with 10X.If so, we demand that 10X clearly disclose their identities and 10X’s aggregate beneficial ownership. The Still-Hidden Transactions/Allocations: Confirm and disclose the precise number of Strategic Advisor Warrants allocated to each assignee under the October 1, 2025 transfers.Clearly the October 1, 2025 transfers were multiple transactions to several different parties – Section 16 requires the disclosure of each transaction and stockholders deserve to have the full information required under securities law. Until 10X provides this information, investors are left to assume that these transfers were not a genuine dispersion of ownership, but a calculated reshuffling of the same economic and voting influence across 10X-linked hands.

“Full and timely disclosure under federal securities laws is not optional; it is the absolute foundation of market integrity,” said Alex Odagiu, Investment Partner at YZi Labs. “A public company board that cannot even enforce basic Section 16 compliance undermines its credibility with investors and the public markets. Stockholders will not accept vague footnotes and 'third-party' camouflage in lieu of required transparency.”

YZi Labs calls on 10X Capital and the BNC Board to provide immediate, complete, and public clarification of all 10X recipients of all transferred warrants and to unequivocally state whether any other parties are acting in concert with 10X.

About YZi Labs
YZILabs Management Ltd. is an investment firm focused on strategic, transparent, and high-governance participation in the digital asset and blockchain sectors. YZi Labs is committed to advancing best-in-class oversight, operational integrity, and shareholder alignment in all investment partnerships.

Media Contact
[email protected]

CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
YZILabs Management Ltd. (“YZi Labs Management”), together with the other participants named herein (collectively, “YZi Labs”), has filed a preliminary consent statement and an accompanying WHITE consent card with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to be used to solicit stockholder written consents to, among other things, expand the size of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of CEA Industries Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and elect certain persons nominated for election to the Board.

YZI LABS STRONGLY ADVISES ALL STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY TO READ THE CONSENT STATEMENT AND OTHER CONSENT MATERIALS, INCLUDING A WHITE CONSENT CARD, AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SUCH CONSENT MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE SEC’S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. IN ADDITION, THE PARTICIPANTS IN THIS CONSENT SOLICITATION WILL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE CONSENT STATEMENT WITHOUT CHARGE, WHEN AVAILABLE, UPON REQUEST.

The participants in the consent solicitation are expected to be YZi Labs Management, Changpeng Zhao, Max Baucus Sieben, David James Chapman, Marie Teresa Goody Guillen, Jiajin He, Alex Odagiu, Matthew Roszak and Ling Zhang (collectively, the “Participants”).

As of the date hereof, YZi Labs Management directly beneficially owns 2,150,481 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Common Stock”). As of the date hereof, YZi Labs Management holds (i) 7,750,510 shares of Common Stock underlying certain Pre-Funded Warrants (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”), (ii) 9,900,991 shares of Common Stock underlying certain Stapled Warrants (the “Stapled Warrants”) and (iii) 3,564,359 shares of Common Stock underlying certain Strategic Advisor Warrants (the “Strategic Advisor Warrants”). Each of the Pre-Funded Warrants, the Stapled Warrants and the Strategic Advisor Warrants either provide that, or the holder has elected that, the holder shall not have the right to exercise any portion of any such warrants to the extent that after giving effect to such issuance after exercise, such holder and certain of its affiliates would be deemed to beneficially own, as determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, more than 4.99% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of Common Stock (the “Beneficial Ownership Limitations”). As of the date hereof, none of YZi Labs Management’s Pre-Funded Warrants, Stapled Warrants or Strategic Advisor Warrants are currently exercisable, and are not expected within 60 days to be exercisable due to the Beneficial Ownership Limitations. Mr. Zhao, as the sole director of YZi Labs Management, may be deemed the beneficial owner of the 2,150,481 shares of Common Stock directly owned by YZi Labs. As of the date hereof, Ms. He may be deemed to beneficially own 2,099,644 shares of Common Stock, including 1,188,120 shares of Common Stock underlying certain Stapled Warrants, and Mr. Odagiu may be deemed to beneficially own 4,918 shares of Common Stock. As of the date hereof, each of Messrs. Baucus, Chapman and Roszak, and Msses. Goody Guillen and Zhang do not beneficially own any shares of Common Stock.

1 Hans Thomas, Form 3, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026.
2 Hans Thomas, Form 4, filed with the SEC on March 2, 2026.
3 Id.
4 Id.

, /PRNewswire/ --

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (NASDAQ: CORT) between October 31, 2024 and December 30, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 21, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

So what: If you purchased Corcept common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Corcept class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51868 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 21, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants represented that the key clinical trials supporting the use of relacorilant as treatment for patients with hypercortisolism were "powerful support" for the New Drug Application ("NDA") that Corcept submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") for this indication. Defendants also stated that they had communicated with the FDA about this NDA and were confident in submitting the NDA, foreseeing no impediments to approval. Toward the latter part of the Class Period, defendants repeatedly told investors that "relacorilant is approaching approval." In truth, the FDA had repeatedly raised concerns about the adequacy of the clinical evidence supporting the relacorilant NDA and, as a result, there was a known material risk that Corcept's relacorilant NDA would not be approved. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Corcept class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=51868 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

     Laurence Rosen, Esq.
     Phillip Kim, Esq.
     The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
     275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 686-1060
     Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
     Fax: (212) 202-3827
     [email protected]
     www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

, /PRNewswire/ -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) between April 22, 2025 and October 28, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 20, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

So What: If you purchased Enphase securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Enphase class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=25593 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 20, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Enphase overstated its ability to manage its channel inventory; (2) Enphase overstated its ability to mitigate effects arising from the termination of the Residential Clean Energy Credit; (3) accordingly, Enphase overstated its financial and operational prospects; and (4) as a result, Enphase's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Enphase class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=25593 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

     Laurence Rosen, Esq.
     Phillip Kim, Esq.
     The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
     275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 686-1060
     Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
     Fax: (212) 202-3827
     [email protected]
     www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

March 10, 2026 22:04 ET  | Source: Diamondback Energy, Inc.

MIDLAND, Texas, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: FANG) (“Diamondback”) announced today the pricing of an underwritten public offering of 11,000,000 shares of its common stock (the “Secondary Offering”) by SGF FANG Holdings, LP (the “Selling Stockholder”). The gross proceeds from the sale of the shares by the Selling Stockholder will be approximately $1.9 billion. Diamondback will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by the Selling Stockholder. The Secondary Offering is expected to close on March 12, 2026, subject to customary closing conditions.

The Selling Stockholder has also granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,650,000 shares of common stock, solely to cover over-allotments.

Evercore ISI, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan are acting as joint book-running managers for the Secondary Offering.

Diamondback has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and other documents Diamondback has filed with the SEC for more complete information about Diamondback and this offering. Copies of the base prospectus and prospectus supplement for the Secondary Offering, when available, may be obtained from Evercore Group L.L.C., Attention: Equity Capital Markets, 55 East 52nd Street, 35th Floor, New York, New York 10055, by telephone at (888) 474-0200, or by email at [email protected]; Citigroup, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717 (Tel: 800-831-9146); and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by email at [email protected] and [email protected].

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

About Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves primarily in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding the completion of the Secondary Offering, Diamondback’s future performance; business strategy; future operations (including drilling plans and capital plans); estimates and projections of revenues, losses, costs, expenses, returns, cash flow, and financial position; reserve estimates and its ability to replace or increase reserves; anticipated benefits of strategic transactions (including acquisitions and divestitures); and plans and objectives of management (including plans for future cash flow from operations and for executing environmental strategies) are forward-looking statements. When used in this news release or otherwise by Diamondback, the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “guidance,” “intend,” “may,” “model,” “outlook,” “plan,” “positioned,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions (including the negative of such terms) as they relate to Diamondback are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Although Diamondback believes that the expectations and assumptions reflected in its forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made, they involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and, in many cases, beyond Diamondback’s control. Accordingly, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and Diamondback’s actual outcomes could differ materially from what Diamondback has expressed in its forward-looking statements. Information concerning these risks and uncertainties and other factors can be found in Diamondback’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including the registration statement, prospectus and prospectus supplement relating to the Secondary Offering and its reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, each of which can be obtained free of charge on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. Diamondback undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement unless required by applicable law.

Investor Contact:

Adam Lawlis

+1 432.221.7467

[email protected]

By You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.

[FIX CAPTION] Samuel Boivin/NurPhoto via Getty Images 2026-03-11T02:15:50.646Z

Anthropic is suing the Pentagon after the US government essentially blacklisted the startup. The company said that the move has already damaged its business. Anthropic is seeking a temporary restraining order against the Defense Department. Anthropic's lawyer said the US government is "pressuring" the startup's customers to go to rival AI providers amid an escalating fight between the Claude developer and the Department of Defense.

During a status conference on Tuesday, Michael Mongan, an attorney for Anthropic, said the Defense Department's decision to effectively blacklist the startup from working with the US military is bringing "real and irreparable harm" to the company each day.

Mongan said customers have begun "expressing doubt" about working with Anthropic and that the government has been on a pressure campaign to get Anthropic's customers to drop the provider and go to competing AI companies.

"We've had university systems and business-to-business companies that have switched to competing AI companies," Mongan said. "And this is all the predictable result of the defendant's actions and the uncertainty they've created, as well as the fact that defendants have been affirmatively reaching out to our customers and pressuring them to stop working with Anthropic and switch to other AI companies."

Last month, after contract negotiations with the AI startup fell apart, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Anthropic was a "supply chain risk" and framed the move as extending beyond direct military work.

"Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic," Hegseth said in an X post on February 27.

The scope of the supply chain risk label is in dispute. Microsoft previously told Business Insider that its lawyers concluded the company can still use Anthropic for non-military-related work. The company also filed an amicus brief, urging the federal court to temporarily block the government's supply chain risk designation.

The issue centers on Anthropic's stance that its frontier model, Claude, cannot be deployed for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of US citizens. Defense officials have said in response that a private company cannot dictate what the military can and cannot do.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said in a blog post on February 26 that the company could not accede to the government's demand for unrestricted, lawful use of its model. A day later, Hegseth formally designated Anthropic a supply chain risk.

Anthropic sued the government on Monday, seeking a temporary restraining order to continue doing business with the government as the case proceeds. The company said in the suit that the Defense Department did not provide adequate grounds to label it a national security risk.

In addition, the company said the designation has never been applied to an American company and that the move was retaliatory, violating the company's First Amendment rights to express its views on AI safety and limitations.

The fallout from Anthropic's blacklisting has been swift, according to legal filings.

Krishna Rao, Anthropic's chief financial officer, said in a declaration filed on Monday that the DoD had contacted several "portfolio companies about their use of Claude" and that those clients have "grown worried and uncertain" about their ability to use the model.

The CFO said the government's action could reduce Anthropic's 2026 revenue by "multiple billions of dollars."

Spokespeople for Anthropic and the Pentagon, as well as Anthropic's lawyer, did not respond to a request for comment.

Anthropic

Read next

NEW YORK and NEW ORLEANS, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., remind investors with substantial losses that they have until March 23, 2026 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR), if they purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities between November 19, 2024 and August 4, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

What You May Do

If you purchased securities of BellRing and would like to discuss your legal rights and how this case might affect you and your right to recover for your economic loss, you may, without obligation or cost to you, contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-877-515-1850 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nyse-brbr/ to learn more. If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by March 23, 2026.

About the Lawsuit

BellRing and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.

On May 6, 2025, the Company disclosed that “several key retailers lowered their weeks of supply on hand, which is expected to be a mid-single-digit headwind to our third quarter growth,” and that “[w]e now expect Q3 sales growth of low single digits.” On this news, the price of BellRing’s shares fell $14.88 per share, or 19%, from $78.43 per share on May 5, 2025, to close at $63.55 per share on May 6, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.

Then, on August 4, 2025, post-market, the Company reported its fiscal 3Q 2025 financial results, disclosing a disappointing new 2025 sales outlook, stating “BellRing management has narrowed its fiscal year 2025 outlook for net sales to [a] range between $2.28-$2.32 billion,” due to “several other competitors” gaining space to sell their products with a large retailer and that “it is not surprising to see new protein RTDs enter[ed]” the convenient nutrition market. On this news, the price of BellRing’s shares fell $17.46 per share, or nearly 33%, from $53.64 per share on August 4, 2025, to $36.18 per share on August 5, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The case is Denha v. BellRing Brands, Inc., No. 26-cv-00575.

About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.

TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services

To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.

Contact:

Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
Lewis Kahn, Managing Partner
[email protected]
1-877-515-1850
1100 Poydras St., Suite 960
New Orleans, LA 70163

CONNECT WITH US: Facebook || Instagram || YouTube || TikTok || LinkedIn

March 10, 2026 22:22 ET  | Source: Transcontinental Inc.

MONTRÉAL, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Transcontinental Inc. (TSX: TCL.A TCL.B) held its Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders today. All of the candidates proposed as directors were elected and all other resolutions were approved by the applicable majority of the votes cast by the shareholders present or represented by proxy at the meeting by secret ballot as follows:

1.Ordinary resolution regarding the election of directors      ForAgainst  Number% of Votes CastNumber% of Votes CastSerge Boulanger
219,346,67499.65%
779,1360.35%
Jacynthe Côté
218,509,77199.27%
1,616,0390.73%
Nelson Gentiletti
218,829,77699.41%
1,296,2340.59%
Isabelle Marcoux
216,169,13498.20%
3,956,6751.80%
Nathalie Marcoux
207,703,01894.36%
12,422,9925.64%
Pierre Marcoux
216,101,45998.17%
4,024,5511.83%
Anna Martini
218,228,58699.14%
1,897,4240.86%
Mario Plourde
205,242,52593.24%
14,883,4846.76%
Jean Raymond
218,841,70499.42%
1,284,3060.58%
Annie Thabet
218,973,11599.48%
1,152,8950.52%
2.
Ordinary resolution appointing KPMG LLP as auditors and authorizing the directors to fix their remuneration
    For
 WithholdNumber
% of Votes Cast Number% of Votes Cast217,516,935
98.77%
 2,701,1251.23%
3.
Advisory ordinary resolution on executive compensation        For
 Against
Withhold
Number
% of Votes Cast Number% of Votes CastNumber% of Votes Cast217,748,635
98.92%
 2,331,9091.06%
45,4660.02%
4.
Special resolution approving amendments to the Articles of the Corporation to change the special rights and restrictions attached to the Class A Subordinate Voting Shares and Class B Shares with respect to the participation of the Class A Subordinate Voting Shares and the Class B Shares in returns of capital and dividends
        For
 Against
Withhold
Number
% of Votes Cast Number% of Votes CastNumber% of Votes Cast220,043,965
99.96%
 43,1620.02%
38,8830.02%

Class A Subordinate Voting Shares

For AgainstWithholdNumber% of Votes Cast
by Class Number% of Votes Cast
by ClassNumber% of Votes Cast
by Class42,985,02599.86% 25,3820.06%32,8830.08%
Class B Shares

For AgainstWithholdNumber% of Votes Cast
by Class Number% of Votes Cast
by ClassNumber% of Votes Cast
by Class177,058,94099.98%
 17,7800.01%
6,0000.01%
5.Special resolution approving a reduction in the stated capital of the Class A Subordinate Voting Shares to facilitate the distribution of a portion of the net proceeds received the Corporation from the sale of the Corporation’s Packaging Sector as a return of capital on the Class A Subordinate Voting Shares, as determined by the Board of Directors at its sole discretion        For
 Against
Withhold
Number
% of Votes Cast Number% of Votes CastNumber% of Votes Cast220,046,80099.96% 50,4000.02%28,8100.02% 6.
Ordinary resolution confirming the adoption of the amended and restated by-laws of the Corporation
        For
 Against
Withhold
Number
% of Votes Cast Number% of Votes CastNumber% of Votes Cast182,888,35083.08% 37,199,13716.90%38,5370.02%
About TC Transcontinental

Founded 50 years ago and 4,000 employees strong, Transcontinental Inc. (TSX: TCL.A TCL.B), known under the TC Transcontinental brand, is a Canadian retail marketing services company, Canada's largest printer, and the Canadian leader in French-language educational publishing. Driven by the vision of a more informed, educated and prosperous society, TC Transcontinental propels its clients' success across the retail, education, book and information industries. With agility, creativity and boldness, we design and deliver innovative, high-value products and services. 

The Corporation's revenues from continuing operations were $1.1 billion for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2025. Until the sale of its Packaging Sector to ProAmpac, which was completed on March 6, 2026, the Corporation was also a North American leader in flexible packaging with approximately 3,600 employees, and revenues from the Corporation's discontinued operations were $1.6 billion for the fiscal year ended October 26, 2025. For more information, please visit www.tc.tc.

For information:
Media
Laurence Boucicault
Senior Advisor, Corporate Communications
TC Transcontinental
Telephone : (438) 226-0469
[email protected]

Financial Community
Yan Lapointe
Senior Director, Investor Relations and Treasury
TC Transcontinental
Telephone : (514) 954-3574
[email protected]

NEW YORK CITY and NEW ORLEANS, March 10, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., notifies investors in Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (“Ultragenyx” or the “Company”) (NasdaqGS: RARE) of a class action securities lawsuit.

CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of investors of Ultragenyx who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between August 3, 2023 and December 26, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team:

https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-rare/

Ultragenyx investors should contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-877-515-1850 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-rare/ to learn more.

CASE DETAILS:   On December 26, 2025, the Company announced the “results from the Phase 3 Orbit and Cosmic studies for setrusumab (UX143) in Osteogenesis Imperfecta” disclosing that both its Phase III Orbit and Cosmic studies failed to demonstrate that setrusumab triggered a statistically significant reduction in annualized fracture rates for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta, and, as a result the Company “is evaluating its planned operations and will promptly define and implement significant expense reductions.”   On this news, the price of Ultragenyx’s shares fell approximately 42%, from $34.19 per share on December 26, 2025 to $19.72 per share on December 29, 2025.

The case is Steven Bailey v. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-01097.

WHAT TO DO? If you invested in Ultragenyx and suffered a loss during the relevant time frame, you have until April 6, 2026 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff; however, your ability to share in any recovery does not require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.

TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services

To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.

Contact:

Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC

Lewis Kahn, Managing Partner
[email protected]
1-877-515-1850
1100 Poydras St., Suite 960
New Orleans, LA 70163

CONNECT WITH US: Facebook || Instagram || YouTube || TikTok || LinkedIn

TL;DR:

Failed Breakout Attempt: PIPPIN reached a local high of $0.39 before retracing, caught in a consolidation range due to immediate selling pressure. Derivatives Explosion: Futures contract volume skyrocketed by 146%, reaching $471 million, reflecting a massive influx of speculative capital. Split Sentiment: Although the Long/Short ratio shows slight optimism at 54%, negative net volume in the spot market suggests seller dominance. The memecoin PIPPIN led a breakout attempt by rising 11% in recent hours, hitting the technical barrier of $0.39. Despite an initial push, the asset retraced to $0.36, closing with a daily gain of 8.41% amidst high volatility.

This brief bullish move was accompanied by a 72% increase in trading volume, marking renewed investor interest. However, the inability to sustain the price above the resistance level indicates that the market lacks the necessary conviction to initiate a prolonged rally.

Rising Derivatives and Selling Pressure in the Spot Market On the other hand, the derivatives ecosystem is seeing frenetic activity. Data from CoinGlass indicates that Open Interest grew by 11% to $96 million, while futures volume surged to $471 million. This influx of liquidity often precedes sharp price movements, though the direction remains uncertain.

While futures show optimism, the spot market tells a different story. Sell volume reached 101 million, outpacing the 84 million in buys, resulting in a negative net balance of -17 million. This massive profit-taking above $0.36 is the primary obstacle for PIPPIN’s market capitalization.

Regarding technical indicators, the Stochastic RSI is at extreme oversold levels (4.9), which technically could suggest a rebound. Nonetheless, the MACD DEMA remains in red territory, validating the risk that investor sentiment may shift toward caution if supports are not maintained.

In summary, PIPPIN is expected to continue trading between $0.30 and $0.40. For a real breakout toward $0.50 to occur, capital flow in derivatives must overcome the selling pressure in the physical market.

Ahmed Balaha

Author

Ahmed Balaha

Part of the Team Since

Aug 2025

About Author

Ahmed Balaha is a journalist and copywriter based in Georgia with a growing focus on blockchain technology, DeFi, AI, privacy, digital assets, and fintech innovation.

Has Also Written

Fact Checked by

CryptoNews Editorial Team

Author

CryptoNews Editorial Team

Part of the Team Since

Sep 2018

About Author

The CryptoNews editorial team is composed of seasoned writers specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. Their expertise ensures comprehensive, accurate, and insightful content for...

Has Also Written

Last updated: 

8 minutes ago

Hyperliquid (HYPE) token is suddenly on fire.

The token jumped to an intraday high near $35 as trading activity exploded on the platform. Volume on its oil perpetuals surged past $1.4 billion, driven by rising geopolitical tensions and wild moves in energy markets.

While most of the crypto market struggled, Hyperliquid actually benefited from the chaos. Traders piled into tokenized oil contracts, pushing daily volume close to $1.39 billion, second only to Bitcoin on the exchange.

Source: ASXN At the same time, the platform rolled out a major upgrade to its margin system. The new portfolio margin feature is designed to make trading more capital efficient while reducing risk during extreme volatility.

Nansen analyst Nicolai Søndergaard said that dynamic scaling reduces systemic risk, making the platform safer for aggressive positioning on volatile assets.

The Levels That Change Everything for Hyperliquid (HYPE)HYPE is still holding strong momentum. The token is up about 5% in the last 24 hours and roughly 120% over the past year. Even while much of the crypto market struggles, the chart continues printing higher lows, keeping the broader uptrend intact.

Right now, the level everyone is watching is $35.28. That recent intraday high is the key resistance. If HYPE manages to close above it on lower timeframes, the chart opens the door toward $38 and potentially the $40 psychological level.

On the downside, $32.50 is the main support. That area has acted as a launchpad during previous pullbacks. If it breaks, the next liquidity zone sits closer to $30. A deeper drop below $28.50 would be needed to truly damage the bullish structure.

Part of the strength comes from growing activity on the platform itself. Open interest has climbed to around $1.2 billion as traders increasingly use Hyperliquid to trade not just crypto, but also assets like oil during major global events.

As long as trading activity stays elevated, HYPE could keep moving independently from the broader crypto market. But if volume fades, the token may struggle to defend the $32.50 floor.

Discover: The best new crypto in the world

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a recent X post, market analyst X Finance Bull claimed that buying XRP at its current price above $1 could be similar to purchasing Bitcoin (BTC) at just $200 in its early days, before the pioneering cryptocurrency skyrocketed. The analyst attributes his bullish outlook to a strong belief that XRP could be gearing up for a major price explosion in the near future, driven by major developmental catalysts. 

X Finance Bull is drawing striking comparisons between XRP’s price at $1.39 and Bitcoin’s early days trading around $200, suggesting that investors who buy XRP now may one day look back on current levels as a missed generational opportunity.  He predicted that many people in the future will claim they would have held XRP during its early stages, even though enduring its past volatility and uncertainty made it extremely difficult for most investors. 

The analyst noted that long-term holders had to endure several challenging events over the past cycles before they could even witness XRP surge above $3 once again in 2025. These challenges include a deep collapse that saw the XRP price declining by more than 93% following its peak. It also encompassed years of regulatory pressure and uncertainty tied to the legal battle between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

The lawsuit, issued in 2018, triggered widespread market fear and led to several exchange delistings, further pressuring XRP’s price and reputation. X Finance Bull also argued that true conviction meant holding XRP even when a federal regulator was actively suing the company associated with the cryptocurrency. 

Now that the legal conflict has concluded, the analyst believes the environment around XRP has changed significantly. In his view, the lawsuit’s resolution marks a turning point that could allow the cryptocurrency to enter a new phase of growth, not just in its price, but in its global positioning and adoption.

XRP’s Institutional Developments And Long-Term Potential Beyond the now-concluded legal battle, X Finance Bull outlined a series of developments and catalysts that he argues make this current cycle dramatically different from any that came before. He noted that these changes could drive the price of XRP beyond $100. 

Among them are the launch of the RLUSD stablecoin, new institutional flows through XRP Spot ETFs, and deeper integration with the traditional financial system. X Finance Bull also pointed to regulatory and banking milestones involving Ripple. 

Source: Chart from X Finance Bull on X According to the analyst, the crypto payments company has received conditional approval for a National Trust Bank and has filed for access to infrastructure linked to the Federal Reserve System. Another major factor X Finance Bull highlighted is the potential passage of the Clarity Act. He argues that once the legislation is signed, it could provide the legal certainty institutions have been waiting for, allowing them to hold, custody, and settle digital assets with a clear regulatory framework. 

Additionally, the analyst noted that cross-border payments amount to more than $150 trillion each year, while financial market infrastructure, such as the DTCC, processes roughly $100 trillion in transactions annually. X Finance Bull emphasized that if even a small share of these massive transaction flows settled on the XRP Ledger, the impact on XRP’s valuation would be enormous, potentially driving it well above $100.

XRP trading at $1.40 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter! For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise Asset Management, Matt Hougan, said Bitcoin’s price could reach $1 million if it captures a sizable share of the $38 trillion global store-of-value market.

In a recent memo, Hougan said the market has expanded significantly over time, yet investors still assume the store-of-value market will remain static.

Matt Hougan says Bitcoin competes with Gold in the store-of-value market Hougan explains that investors have always turned to gold to protect their wealth, and many now see Bitcoin as a suitable alternative because it is scarce, durable, and well-known worldwide. 

The CIO estimated that gold accounts for about $36 trillion of the $38 trillion store-of-value market, while Bitcoin holds about $1.4 trillion (less than 4% market share). From this point, Hougan says many analysts compare Bitcoin to gold because it also allows investors to store wealth outside of traditional financial systems and has a scarce supply of only 21 million coins.

But unlike Gold, Bitcoin exists digitally and can be broken down into extremely small units, allowing investors to move it quickly and easily across the internet.

Yet even with these qualities, people struggle to believe in $1 million per Bitcoin because it would take a miracle for the coin to capture more than half of the store-of-value market anytime in the near future. 

However, Hougan says the store-of-value market will not remain the same, as global wealth continues to expand and more people seek ways to protect their money. 

Bitcoin price could reach $1 million as more people use it to store wealth In his memo, Matt Hougan said markets that preserve wealth can expand faster than investors expect, citing that gold’s total value rose from $2.5 trillion in 2004 to about $40 trillion today. This means the value compounded at 13% year after year as demand worldwide grew.

For the past two decades, investors have poured more money into store-of-value assets because government debt has increased in many parts of the world, wars have broken out, and central banks have introduced loose monetary policies that have kept interest rates low.

Hougan says the total market could reach $121 trillion over the next 10 years if the store-of-value market continues to expand at the same pace, and Bitcoin would need to capture only about 17% to reach $1 million. 

Hougan says investors will only accept that Bitcoin can move from its current 4% to 17% if they focus on how quickly adoption has increased in recent years.

More institutional investors have brought new money into Bitcoin over the past few years, and the coin’s long-term volatility has declined when compared to its initial years. 

Trends in portfolio allocation also reflect changing attitudes. For instance, in previous years, even a 1% allocation to Bitcoin by professional investors was viewed as aggressive. However, there is now an increasing trend of institutions allocating 5% to Bitcoin in diversified portfolios. Even a small increase in overall allocation levels can generate high demand.

Nevertheless, Hougan identifies some risks that may affect these predictions. First, the store-of-value market may not continue to rise at the pace it has over the last 20 years. Secondly, the economic factors that contributed to gold’s rise in value may not recur.

Another possibility is that Bitcoin may not reach the market share necessary to hit these price targets. Adoption may not be rapid enough, or investors may prefer traditional store-of-value assets like gold rather than traditional alternatives.

At the same time, however, Hougan also warns that these projections may not even be conservative enough. If there is growing concern about government debt or currency stability in the future, investors may require even higher returns from assets known to hold up well in the long run. Then, the growth of the global store-of-value market could accelerate even faster.

If such a scenario comes to pass, Bitcoin’s market share will exceed the expected 17% and its value will be further elevated. For Hougan, the important factor is not the price target but how the market’s framework changes with the possibility of further market growth.

In that context, Hougan explains that analysts who use a fixed market size to determine Bitcoin’s value may miss an important part of the picture. If the store-of-value market continues to grow and Bitcoin continues to increase its share of that market, it becomes clear how it is possible to reach $1 million per Bitcoin.

Ethereum (ETH) holds firm around $2,000–$2,080 amid fading liquidations and emerging buyer interest in mid March.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: March 11, 2026 │ 12:52 AM GMT

Created by Kornelija Poderskytė from DailyCoin

Ethereum is holding just above the $2,000 line after a bruising flush that forced traders to unwind leveraged bets, yet price action has stayed stubbornly calm for days. In the latest stretch of choppy trading, ETH has hovered around $2,060 after bouncing from the $1,900 area, even as broader sentiment remains fragile.

That steadiness is showing up across majors. Bitcoin has been circling the high-$60,000s and XRP has largely defended the low-$1.30s, suggesting the selloff may be running into a wall of spot demand rather than cascading into a deeper capitulation.

A Tug-Of-War At $2,150 With $2K As The Line In The Sand Technically, traders are focused on a tight band: ETH has struggled to clear resistance near $2,150, a level that has repeatedly capped upside attempts in early March. A clean break above that zone would be the first convincing signal that buyers are regaining control.

Sponsored

If it fails again, the market’s attention snaps back to support near $1,984 and the psychological $2,000 handle. A decisive breakdown could reopen the path to deeper levels around $1,750, based on widely watched chart structures and prior demand zones.

What’s notable is how muted momentum indicators have been during the bounce. With volume thinning and oscillators sitting near neutral, the move higher hasn’t looked like an aggressive trend reversal—more like a market catching its breath after forced selling.

Ether’s Exchange Balances Fall, But Whales Still Move Size.. On-chain data is adding a second storyline. Exchange reserves for ETH have slid to multi-year lows, typically interpreted as reduced immediate sell pressure as coins move into long-term storage. That dynamic often tightens available supply during periods when demand returns.

At the same time, blockchain watchers have flagged sporadic large wallet transfers, including activity from long-dormant addresses. Those moves don’t prove distribution on their own, but they complicate the “supply shock” narrative and keep traders sensitive to any renewed spikes in derivatives positioning.

Check out DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:
Strategy Breaks Record with One-Day STRC Stock Sale
XRP Whale Stash Grows To 11B On Fresh SWIFT Buzz

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

Stablecoins are rapidly reshaping global finance as transaction volume surges past traditional payment giants, signaling accelerating institutional adoption and expanding real-world use cases across emerging markets, cross-border payments, and enterprise financial infrastructure. Stablecoin Growth Signals Rising Institutional Demand Worldwide Stablecoin adoption is accelerating globally as transaction activity and institutional use expand.

Decentralized lending platform Aave saw approximately $27 million in liquidations over a single 24-hour period, with blockchain data from risk-management firm Chaos Labs confirming a sharp spike in activity. Market observers believe the event stemmed from a configuration error in the protocol's pricing infrastructure rather than any broader market instability.

At the center of the incident was wstETH, a Lido-issued token representing staked Ethereum that naturally appreciates over time due to accumulated staking rewards. According to on-chain analysts, Aave's risk oracle was briefly valuing wstETH at around 1.19 ETH while open markets priced it closer to 1.23 ETH — a gap wide enough to push certain borrowing positions into liquidation territory.

Chaos Labs later clarified that the underlying market oracle was functioning correctly. The real culprit was a misconfiguration in Aave's CAPO oracle, a safeguard designed to cap how rapidly yield-bearing token values can rise. Outdated parameters stored in a smart contract — specifically a stale exchange rate and its timestamp — caused the system to calculate a maximum allowable rate below wstETH's actual market value. The result was that the protocol temporarily treated wstETH as roughly 2.85% less valuable than it truly was, triggering a cascade of automated liquidations.

Importantly, Chaos Labs confirmed the protocol suffered no bad debt from the episode. However, liquidators — bots and traders who settle undercollateralized loans in exchange for discounted assets — walked away with approximately 499 ETH in bonuses and arbitrage profits.

Chaos Labs CEO Omer Goldberg stated that every affected user would be fully reimbursed. A Lido contributor also confirmed the issue was entirely unrelated to how wstETH operates, noting the Lido protocol continued functioning normally throughout the event.

The incident echoes a similar oracle failure on DeFi lender Moonwell, where a misconfiguration briefly priced cbETH at $1, resulting in nearly $1.8 million in bad debt — a reminder of how critical accurate oracle infrastructure remains across decentralized finance.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>