Market Signal Briefing

There are some great bargains to be found in the consumer space. If you're looking for some cheap stocks with big potential, this is a great place to go bargain hunting.

Let's look at three stocks you can invest $1,000 in right now.

Image source: Getty Images.

1. Amazon

Today's Change

(

-0.87

%) $

-1.83

Current Price

$

207.70

We don't have to dig too deep to find our first bargain consumer stock. Amazon (AMZN 0.87%) is the undisputed leader in e-commerce and has long traded at a premium to its brick-and-mortar peers. However, that is no longer the case, with the stock now trading at a huge discount compared to Walmart and Costco.

AMZN PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts

With a forward price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of below 28 times analyst estimates, the stock is on sale, especially when compared to the over 40 times multiples of its two rivals. It is also growing its retail sales at a quicker pace, while at the same time seeing strong operating leverage, as its investments in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) drive efficiency gains.

On top of that, the company is also the market-share leader in cloud computing, where its revenue is beginning to accelerate. Amazon has formed partnerships with top AI model makers, including Anthropic and OpenAI, and is spending aggressively to drive growth.

With a little more than $1,000, investors can buy five shares of Amazon.

2. Crocs

Today's Change

(

-2.11

%) $

-1.68

Current Price

$

77.95

With a forward P/E of approximately 6 times and a free-cash-flow yield of 16%, Crocs (CROX 2.11%) stock is in the deep discount bin. The footwear maker has struggled following its disastrous acquisition of the HeyDude brand, which, unbeknownst to the company at the time, had serious inventory and channel issues that have lingered.

The company worked aggressively to finally try to clean up these issues in 2025, and it should start to see that business stabilize later this year. If it can return the brand to growth, it would be a big boost to the stock. HeyDude has been such a drag that any improvement could go a long way.

Meanwhile, the company's core Crocs business is stable. North America sales have been down, but the company is seeing strong international growth. It plans to aggressively expand its retail footprint in international markets this year, with it set to open up to 250 new stores, mostly in China, India, and Western Europe. The company is also leaning into new silhouettes, like sandals, and product innovation to help reinvigorate growth.

Crocs is a solid turnaround candidate, with a lot of upside if it can straighten out HeyDude and improve North American sales. With $1,000, investors can buy about 12 shares of the stock.

3. Jakks Pacific

Today's Change

(

-1.94

%) $

-0.39

Current Price

$

19.71

While Jakks Pacific's (JAKK 1.94%) stock has had a strong start to the year, up more than 20%, it still finds itself in the bargain bin, trading at a forward P/E of under 6.5 times. 2025 was a challenging year for the company, with tariffs and some consumer segments stressed due to higher prices. However, it was still able to maintain a strong balance sheet, ending the year with $54 million in cash and no debt.

Notably, despite this difficult operating environment, the company was able to achieve its highest gross margin in more than 15 years at 32.4%, as it improved inventory management and became more cost-disciplined. The company has refused to get into discounting wars and is more focused on profitability over just revenue growth.

Meanwhile, Jakks should benefit this year from the strong children's movie slate, which helps feed into both its toys and costume businesses. This is a huge year for children's movies, with some big-time releases like Toy Story 5, Moana, The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, Minions 3, and Paw Patrol 3. Halloween also falls on a Saturday, which can be a boost to its costume business.

Overall, Jakks is a cheap stock with some nice catalysts coming this year. With around $1,000, investors can scoop up 50 shares.

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. (NASDAQ: FFAI) (“Faraday Future”, “FF” or the “Company”), a California-based global Embodied AI (EAI) ecosystem company, today shared a weekly business update from YT Jia, Founder and Global Co-CEO of FF. “Today's weekly report was supposed to start with a piece of wonderful news: FFAI Headquarters will relocate to Silicon Beach area next weekend, along with two important business updates on the execution of our EAI strategy.

Bittensor (TAO) surged 19.19% in the last 24 hours, fueled by a wave of demand tied to its AI-powered subnet ecosystem.

The rally coincided with a viral social media moment from Templar, one of TAO’s most active subnets, and growing interest in decentralized artificial intelligence tokens.

Subnet Token Demand Drives TAO Price HigherAs of this writing, Bittensor’s powering token, TAO, was trading for to trade at $284.75, up by 19.19% in the last 24 hours.

Bittensor (TAO) Price Performance. Source: BeInCryptoThe catalyst behind TAO’s move may be straightforward. Investors need to hold TAO to exchange into subnet tokens, and a surge in Templar hype created a wave of buying pressure.

Tao Telegraph, a community account, noted that a single viral Templar post was enough to push TAO demand higher, speculating that simultaneous hype across multiple subnets could amplify this effect significantly.

Let’s be real, TAO is up because of this viral post by @tplr_ai

To buy tao subnet tokens, investors NEED to own $TAO to exchange into it… there is no way around this.

Hype for one subnet token this week caused TAO demand to rise, just imagine if there is this type of demand… https://t.co/d8x4zGlpuy

— TAO Telegraph — Bittensor Media (@taotelegraph) March 14, 2026 Three TAO ecosystem subnets, SN3 Templar, SN4 Targon, and SN39 Basilica, ranked among the top eight daily gainers according to CoinGecko. TAO itself broke above $280 during the move.

Templar’s Covenant-72B Marks AI MilestoneBehind the hype sits a tangible technical achievement. On March 10, Templar announced the completion of Covenant-72B, a 72-billion-parameter Large Language Model (LLM) pre-trained entirely on Bittensor’s Subnet 3.

The model was trained on roughly 1.1 trillion tokens using commodity internet connections. No centralized cluster or whitelist was involved. Anyone with GPUs could participate freely.

Templar used a technique called SparseLoCo to overcome bandwidth limitations. Each participant ran local optimizer steps before compressing and sharing updates, making decentralized training feasible at 72B scale.

We just completed the largest decentralised LLM pre-training run in history: Covenant-72B. Permissionless, on Bittensor subnet 3.

72B parameters. ~1.1T tokens. Commodity internet. No centralized cluster. No whitelist. Anyone with GPUs could join or leave freely.

1/n pic.twitter.com/W0Ks563Cld

— templar (@tplr_ai) March 10, 2026 The team said Covenant-72B delivers performance competitive with centralized models like LLaMA-2-70B.

Van de Poppe Rebalances Around TAO StrengthTrader Michael van de Poppe disclosed that he sold 10.42 TAO at $288 for roughly $3,000. He rotated proceeds into SEI and EIGEN while keeping nearly 50% of his portfolio in TAO and NEAR.

“The AI <> Crypto narrative is one of the core angles of the upcoming markets,” wrote Van de Poppe.

He flagged TAO’s move as a 1.8 sigma event on the daily timeframe, calling it slightly overextended and ripe for a short-term correction that could offer a re-entry point.

Whether TAO can sustain these levels may depend on continued subnet activity and broader AI sector momentum heading into next week.

Anchorage Digital, operator of the US federally chartered digital asset focused bank, has introduced support for institutional liquid restaking through a strategic collaboration with Puffer Finance. The Ethereum-focused liquid restaking platform and infrastructure provider now allows qualified clients to engage in advanced yield-generating strategies directly within Anchorage’s secure environment.

The new capability lets institutions stake their Ethereum holdings on the Anchorage platform and automatically receive pufETH, Puffer’s native liquid restaking token, credited straight into their custody accounts.

This structure delivers combined rewards from standard Ethereum validation alongside additional yields from restaking activities.

Importantly, participants retain full liquidity, enabling them to transfer, trade, or deploy the tokens across compatible decentralized applications and networks without withdrawing from the platform.

Nathan McCauley, the co-founder and chief executive officer of Anchorage Digital, emphasized the strategic importance of this development.

He described restaking as an essential building block for the next wave of institutional engagement in digital asset markets.

The integration, he noted, delivers a fully regulated and protected avenue for accessing these opportunities while eliminating extra operational or security demands.

This move further advances Anchorage’s goal of elevating sophisticated blockchain tools to institutional standards.

Liquid restaking extends beyond conventional staking by permitting already-committed Ethereum to contribute security to a broader array of on-chain services and protocols.

Institutions using pufETH gain exposure to these layered rewards without the need to lock capital long-term or handle validator operations themselves.

Puffer Finance’s design specifically targets reduced operational hazards and wider validator inclusion, making restaking more approachable through a tradable token format rather than direct infrastructure management.

For large allocators, this translates to superior capital utilization and streamlined entry into evolving restaking landscapes.

Amir Forouzani, co-founder and chief executive officer of Puffer Finance, welcomed the partnership.

He explained that Puffer’s protocol was engineered to enhance accessibility, protection, and efficiency in Ethereum staking and restaking.

By teaming with Anchorage Digital, the solution now incorporates the stringent regulatory oversight, safeguarding measures, and operational controls that major institutional investors demand.

As a result, pufETH stands out as a practical and appealing vehicle for professional restaking participation.

The collaboration underscores Anchorage Digital’s dedication to broadening institutional pathways into emerging on-chain technologies, including staking, restaking, governance participation, and settlement processes—all within a compliant, consolidated framework.

Clients benefit from seamless integration that avoids the risks of splitting activities across disparate providers or introducing new counterparty exposures.

Anchorage’s established custody solutions, governance tools, and industry-leading security architecture provide the foundation for these activities.

Founded in 2017 and headquartered in San Francisco, Anchorage Digital serves global institutions through a comprehensive suite of services encompassing trading, staking, custody, stablecoin issuance, and advanced security infrastructure.

It operates Anchorage Digital Bank N.A., the nation’s first federally regulated crypto bank, alongside licensed entities in Singapore and New York.

The platform also extends fiat custody via FDIC-insured partners.

Backed by investors such as Andreessen Horowitz, GIC, Goldman Sachs, KKR, and Visa, the company maintains a valuation of $4.2 billion and maintains offices across New York, Portugal, Singapore, and South Dakota.

This integration represents another milestone in Anchorage Digital’s ongoing expansion of regulated on-chain offerings tailored for institutional clients.

Organizations seeking further information on incorporating liquid restaking into their portfolios through this solution are encouraged to contact the firm directly.

The announcement highlights growing institutional interest in Ethereum’s evolving ecosystem, where liquid restaking protocols like Puffer are poised to play a central role in capital efficiency and network security.

By combining Puffer’s innovative token mechanics with Anchorage’s regulatory-grade infrastructure, the partnership sets a benchmark for flexible participation in next-generation blockchain primitives.

As the crypto sector matures, such developments are expected to accelerate adoption among traditional finance entities looking for compliant yield opportunities without compromising on safety or liquidity.

Since recovering from the $197 support zone, Zcash has remained trapped inside a tight range. The altcoin traded between $200 and $230, reflecting a market still searching for direction.

That consolidation continued on the daily chart as price briefly climbed to a local high near $229 before easing back.

At press time, Zcash [ZEC] traded at $226, up 9.26% in the last 24 hours. During this move, ZEC flipped its short-term Exponential Moving Average (EMA20), indicating improving upside momentum.

Zcash rides on speculative demand Despite the range-bound structure, Derivatives traders showed increasing bullish positioning.

On the 15th of March, Zcash recorded $160.8 million in Futures Inflows compared to $144.4 million across the 12-hour timeframe.

As a result, Futures Netflows jumped 544% to $16.5 million during the same period.

Source: CoinGlass On top of that, 24-hour Netflows climbed 14% to $12 million, highlighting continued derivatives participation. Such inflows suggested traders were actively opening positions as market participants positioned for volatility.

That activity also appeared in Open Interest, which rose 10.49% to $371 million.

Rising Open Interest alongside capital inflows typically indicates stronger demand for futures positions.

Source: Coinalyze Meanwhile, the Long/Short Ratio climbed to 1.23. Long positions accounted for 55.4% while shorts held 44.8%. A ratio above 1 suggested that most traders anticipated further upside.

Momentum indicators flash bullish With capital flowing into the derivatives market, ZEC showed strengthening upside momentum. Looking at the Relative Strength Index (RSI), the indicator rose from 42 to 47, indicating rising buying pressure.

However, buyers have yet to take control of the market as RSI still remains below 50. Likewise, ZEC flipped EMA20 at $224, further validating this bullish momentum.

Source: TradingView With these indicators flashing bullish, they signal potential trend continuation if sustained. Thus, if demand holds and RSI forms a bullish crossover, ZEC will flip $230 and target $250 resistance.

However, if the demand turns into only short-term speculation, ZEC will drop towards $205.

Whales pull the market back While other market participants have shown determination to pull ZEC out of the woods, whales continue to pull the market back.

Spot Average Order Size data showed whales have stacked orders below $220. Increased large orders between $197 and $212 were associated with higher whale participation across these levels.

Source: CryptoQuant However, these whales have mostly been selling orders. Looking at Spot Taker CVD, sellers have dominated the market over the last 30 days.

Every time Zcash attempted a breakout, whales have stepped in and cashed out, further straining the market. The continuity of these whale behaviors presents significant bearish pressure and could lead to prolonged weakness for ZEC.

Source: CryptoQuant Therefore, for a sustained upside move, ZEC needs a shift in whale sentiments. Until then, Zcash is likely to see further weakness, with a high likelihood of sideways movement.

Final Summary Zcash [ZEC] traded within a tight $200–$230 range after rebounding from the $197 support zone. Derivatives activity surged, with Futures Netflows jumping 544% to $16.5M as traders opened new positions.

TLDR: Bittensor’s (TAO) active subnets grew fourfold from 32 to 129 following the dTAO launch in early 2025. The top three compute subnets reached a combined $20M ARR just three months after monetization was activated. A TAO price of $1,000 would represent under 1.5% of the projected $1.4 trillion AI market by 2028. Grayscale and Bitwise have both filed for spot TAO ETFs, potentially opening access to institutional capital.
A growing number of crypto investors are pointing to Bittensor’s $TAO token as a serious candidate for a major price move. The case being made is not based on speculation alone.

It draws on subnet revenue data, token supply mechanics, and institutional filing activity. With $TAO trading near $268 today, the path to $1,000 is being examined with real numbers rather than market sentiment.

Real Revenue Numbers Are Changing How Investors View $TAO Crypto analyst Tanaka recently published a detailed breakdown of why he is accumulating $TAO. Central to his thesis is the revenue now being generated across Bittensor’s active subnets.

The network has grown from 32 subnets to 129 since dTAO launched in early 2025, a fourfold increase within months.

I keep getting asked why I'm so convicted on $TAO

So today, I want to share the numbers behind my thesis, and why I believe $1,000 and even $3,000 are realistic targets.

First, about the fundamentals, I've already shared those in my previous post. You can read it here 👆… https://t.co/gYHyMQRrMV pic.twitter.com/GgaHtBd6Lx

— Tanaka (@Tanaka_L2) March 15, 2026

More telling than the subnet count is the monetization speed. The top three compute subnets combined have reached $20 million in annual recurring revenue. That figure arrived roughly three months after monetization was switched on across those networks.

Taragon Compute (SN4) leads with approximately $10.4 million ARR, serving enterprise clients through confidential computing.

Chutes AI (SN64) follows at around $4.3 million ARR, processing over 120 billion tokens daily at rates 85% cheaper than AWS. Lium.io (SN51) adds further traction by offering the lowest H100 GPU rental pricing currently on the market.

These are payments from real customers, not projections. For investors watching the asset, the shift from narrative-driven buying to revenue-backed conviction marks a meaningful turning point.

The Math Behind $1,000 and What Would Need to Happen $TAO carries a fully diluted valuation of roughly $5.6 billion at current prices. A move to $1,000 would push that figure to approximately $21 billion.

Tanaka frames that as under 1.5% of the $1.4 trillion AI market projected by 2028, making the target appear less extreme in context.

Subnet ARR would need to scale to between $200 million and $500 million to support that valuation. Going from zero to $20 million in three months gives some investors confidence that trajectory is not unrealistic. Tanaka places the $1,000 target within a 12–18 month window.

Token supply mechanics are also working in the asset’s favor. A recent halving cut new emissions by 50%, and approximately 68% of the total supply is currently staked. That combination reduces sell pressure while demand continues to build.

Grayscale and Bitwise have each filed applications for spot $TAO exchange-traded funds. Approval of either filing would open the door to a new category of institutional buyers. Investors following the asset closely see that development as a potential accelerant toward the $1,000 level.

The regulatory provisions outlined in the US Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act, otherwise known as the CLARITY Act, threaten to give large financial institutions control over crypto, according to Dr. Friederike Ernst, co-founder of the Gnosis blockchain protocol.

Regulations in the CLARITY crypto market structure bill assume that activity must pass through centralized intermediaries, which risks consolidating crypto rails in the hands of a few entrenched players, Ernst told Cointelegraph.

The preface of the CLARITY crypto market structure bill. Source: United States Congress“Blockchain’s real breakthrough was not just a new financial infrastructure. It was the ability for users themselves to become owners of the networks they rely on," she said. Ernst added:

“If activity is pushed back through institutional intermediaries, users risk becoming customers renting access to financial technology once again rather than stakeholders in it. The challenge is ensuring regulatory clarity does not unintentionally undermine that ownership model.”Despite the bill’s shortcomings, the CLARITY Act does clarify regulatory jurisdiction over crypto between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), as well as protects peer-to-peer transactions and self-custody, Ernst said.

However, the failure of the market structure bill to adequately protect open, permissionless blockchain rails and decentralized finance protocols risks bringing all the same points of failure of the legacy financial system to crypto, Ernst said.

CLARITY Act stalled due to banks and traditional financial institutionsThe highly anticipated CLARITY Act remains stalled in Congress over disagreement between the crypto industry and the banking industry over the issue of stablecoin yield and whether or not stablecoin issuers can share interest with holders.

In January, crypto exchange Coinbase announced it was pulling its support for the bill, citing concerns over provisions that would weaken the decentralized finance industry, prohibit stablecoin yield, and prevent the growth of the tokenized real-world asset sector.

President Trump slams banks for holding up the CLARITY Act. Source: Donald Trump“We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in response to reading a draft of the bill.

US Senator Bernie Moreno said he is optimistic the CLARITY bill will pass by April and head to US President Donald Trump’s desk for signing.

However, if the bill does not pass by April 2026, the odds of it becoming law in 2026 are “extremely low,” according to Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at investment firm Galaxy.

“It's very possible that rewards are not the 'final' hurdle but instead just the current hill the bill is dying on,” Thorn said in an X post on Saturday, pointing to potential issues around DeFi, developer protections, and regulatory authority.

Magazine: Clarity Act risks repeat of Europe’s mistakes, crypto lawyer warns

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Cover image via U.Today Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

The broader crypto market showed signs of recovery early Sunday with major cryptocurrencies, including Dogecoin, returning to the green.

At the time of writing, DOGE was up 2% in the last 24 hours to $0.096. The positive price increase caught short sellers unawares, with short positions accounting for the majority of liquidations in the last 24 hours.

According to CoinGlass data, short liquidations accounted for $470,140 or 4,897,291 DOGE in the last 24 hours.

HOT Stories

The price action in the last 24 hours continues a recovery from the March 8 low of $0.086. Although Dogecoin's price rise has been slow, the market is presenting signs of renewed demand.

You Might Also Like

Dogecoin rose for three days at a stretch from March 12, rising to the higher bound of its recent trading range. The broader picture still remains that of consolidation, with Dogecoin trading sideways between $0.0799 and $0.117 since February.

What's next?Dogecoin resorted to a tight trading range between $0.094 and $0.097 after a three-day rise took its price to $0.101 on March 13.

You Might Also Like

The tight trading range suggests a potential range expansion in the immediate term. A break above the daily MA 50 near $0.1 might open the door to a rise to $0.12.

Dogecoin may consolidate between $0.09 and $0.12 for a little longer if the price drops from $0.12. A close above the $0.12 resistance might pave way for a rally to the $0.16 level, while a break below the $0.09 support will target $0.0799.

A potential catalyst for Dogecoin in the coming days is the upcoming payments feature on social media X scheduled to go live next month, although there are no indications of crypto integrations yet.

In February, X's Head of Product Nikita Bier indicated that crypto trading tools would arrive on X through Smart Cashtags but clarified the application would not execute trades or act as a brokerage.

TLDR: The Bitcoin Exchange Whale Ratio has reached its highest recorded level in six years amid a sharp BTC drawdown. Retail participation in Bitcoin markets remains near cycle lows even as large holders increase their exchange activity. Historical data shows similar whale spikes have appeared near local bottoms before the next major price move higher. Trader @KillaXBT notes BTC price action has been mechanical for two years, with corrections resolving within two to three weeks. Bitcoin whale activity has reached its highest level in six years, according to on-chain data. The Exchange Whale Ratio, a metric tracking large holder contributions to exchange inflows, has spiked notably.

Meanwhile, retail participation remains near cycle lows. Bitcoin’s price sits around $70,000 following a sharp drawdown.

Historically, such conditions have appeared near local market bottoms. The data points to a possible shift in market structure, as large players appear to be moving ahead of smaller investors.

What the Exchange Whale Ratio Reveals The Exchange Whale Ratio measures how much of the Bitcoin flowing to exchanges comes from large holders. A spike in this ratio means whales are sending more BTC to exchanges relative to retail participants.

This kind of activity often precedes major price turning points in the market. The current reading is the highest this metric has recorded in six years.

Source: Cryptoquant

At the same time, retail activity remains near its lowest levels of the current cycle. This contrast between whale aggression and retail passivity is a pattern that has appeared before.

In past cycles, similar setups tended to emerge near local bottoms before the next leg higher. Traders and analysts are now watching closely to see whether history repeats.

The combination of whale accumulation and retail caution has drawn broad attention across the crypto space. Data from exchange inflows shows large holders are actively repositioning their Bitcoin.

Whether these moves signal distribution or accumulation remains a key question. On-chain metrics alone cannot confirm the direction, but the activity level is hard to ignore.

One market observer noted that the current setup is “notable,” given that Bitcoin hovers around $70,000. The sharp drawdown preceding this spike mirrors conditions seen in prior cycles.

As a result, the Exchange Whale Ratio is being closely monitored by analysts. Many are treating it as one of several indicators pointing to a potential market inflection.

How Recent Trading Patterns Support the Data Crypto trader @KillaXBT offered a broader perspective on Bitcoin’s recent price behavior. He described the past two years of trading as “some of the easiest ever,” citing mechanical price action.

According to him, the market has been dominated by clear ranges throughout this period. Corrections and impulsive moves have typically lasted just two to three weeks.

The past 2 years of trading $BTC have been some of the easiest ever.

PA has been extremely mechanical and largely market maker orchestrated, with textbook ranges throughout.

We've seen 2 years dominated by ranges, with corrections and impulsive moves typically lasting just 2–3… pic.twitter.com/o2cAcLza6W

— Killa (@KillaXBT) March 14, 2026

The consistency of these short-term cycles adds context to the current whale activity. If corrections have historically resolved within weeks, then the present drawdown may already be nearing its end.

Large holders appear to be factoring this into their positioning. Their activity on exchanges supports the idea that a move may be approaching.

Retail investors, however, have not yet responded to these signals in any meaningful way. Low retail participation during whale accumulation phases has often preceded sharp recoveries in past cycles.

This gap between institutional and retail behavior tends to close as price action becomes clearer. For now, Bitcoin’s on-chain data continues to attract close attention from market participants.

Whether this cycle follows the same historical path will depend on broader market conditions. The data, however, continues to build a case that large players are already moving.

Meanwhile, smaller investors remain on the sidelines. The coming weeks may prove whether the current setup resolves as past patterns suggest.

TLDR: $3.44B in leveraged long positions sit near $66.5K, risking forced liquidations. Bitcoin trades around $71,544, consolidating below resistance at $72K. MACD shows fading bullish momentum, RSI at 58 indicates moderate buying strength. Breakdown below $70K could trigger rapid liquidation of billions in longs. Bitcoin faces a critical liquidation risk as over $3.4B in leveraged long positions sit near $66.5K. A $5,000 drop from the current $71,595 level could trigger significant forced liquidations.

Leveraged Long Positions and Market Pressure According to Coinglass data, the largest cluster of long liquidations is concentrated around $66,500. Over $3.44 billion in cumulative leveraged positions sit below Bitcoin’s current price, spread across major exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Bybit.

If Bitcoin drops roughly $5,000, these positions would be automatically closed. Exchanges sell Bitcoin to cover losses, creating additional downward pressure on the market. 

This process can accelerate price declines and trigger a short-term cascade of forced liquidations.

Traders and institutional participants monitor these clusters closely. Large liquidation pools often act as liquidity magnets, attracting strategic buying and selling. 

Price can move toward these zones before reversing sharply once excess leverage is cleared. Currently, the market is long-biased. 

The dominance of long positions near the downside indicates traders are heavily leveraged on bullish bets, which may increase the potential for a rapid downward move if selling pressure accelerates.

Consolidation, Momentum, and Key Levels The 4-hour chart shows Bitcoin consolidating just below the $72,000 resistance, trading near $71,544. Price action forms a series of higher lows since the late February drop to $65,000, signaling a short-term bullish trend.

Range-bound consolidation between $70,000 and $72,000 indicates buyers defending support and sellers limiting rallies. Momentum indicators show moderation: 

MACD lines are flattening, and the histogram has begun turning negative, while RSI at 58 suggests moderate bullish sentiment.

Critical levels to watch include resistance at $72,000–$73,500 and support at $70,000. A breakdown below $70,000 could test the $68,000–$66,500 range, exposing billions in leveraged long positions. 

Conversely, a break above resistance may target $74,000–$75,000, providing room for controlled upward movement.

Overall, the market remains cautiously bullish but fragile. Traders should monitor the $66,500 liquidation cluster, as forced liquidations could trigger rapid price swings in either direction.

TLDR: Tron Revenue hits $947K in 24 hours, far above Base and Ethereum combined. Monthly revenue reaches $24.96M, surpassing Polygon, Base, and Solana together. Stablecoin transfers drive consistent fees and support large-volume transactions. TRX technicals show momentum gaining near 50-day MA, with resistance at 200-day MA. Tron Revenue has emerged as the top-performing blockchain, surpassing Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana in daily, weekly, and monthly revenue. Stablecoin transfers and low transaction costs remain key drivers of this performance.

Revenue Performance and Network Comparison Tron generated about $947,419 in revenue over the past 24 hours. This figure is nearly ten times higher than Base, which recorded $97,720, and far above Ethereum at $77,565. 

Over seven days, Tron accumulated around $5.42 million. In comparison, Polygon recorded $632,000 and Solana $374,000.

On a 30-day scale, Tron Revenue reached approximately $24.96 million. Polygon generated $4.5 million, Base $3.72 million, and Solana $1.78 million. 

Tron’s monthly earnings alone surpass the combined revenue of these networks, reflecting its dominant position in the blockchain landscape.

The network’s success is closely tied to stablecoin activity, particularly Tether (USDT). Tron has become a primary layer for USDT transfers globally, especially in markets where stablecoins are widely used for remittances, payments, and liquidity management. 

This activity ensures a constant flow of network fees and reinforces Tron Revenue leadership.

Tron’s low transaction costs and high throughput allow rapid, large-volume transfers. Other networks focus on decentralization and smart contract innovation, but Tron prioritizes speed and affordability, which supports large-scale payment and exchange operations.

Technical and Market Dynamics TRX, Tron’s native token, is trading within a descending channel, signaling that sellers have controlled the market since the previous peak near $0.35–$0.36. 

Lower highs and lower lows indicate the macro trend remains bearish. Short-term momentum shows improvement. 

TRX recently reclaimed the 50-day moving average, now acting as dynamic support. The token is also in a rectangular accumulation zone, where buyers and sellers are competing for control.

The 200-day moving average represents the next resistance level. A breakout above this level could indicate a trend shift. 

Momentum indicators, such as the RSI forming higher lows, suggest rising buying pressure. Traders are watching these levels for potential breakout or downside scenarios near $0.253–$0.250.

A notable treasury transaction unfolded within the Ethereum [ETH] ecosystem.

On the 14th of March, the Ethereum Foundation transferred 5,000 Ethereum worth about $10.38 million to a newly created wallet.

Source: Lookonchain Soon after, the Foundation confirmed the transfer as an OTC sale priced near $2,042 per ETH to BitMine Immersion Technologies, linked to Tom Lee. Rather than routing supply through exchanges, the transaction moved directly to an institutional counterparty.

Source: Ethereum Foundation/ X This structure helps fund ecosystem development while limiting immediate market impact. At the same time, institutional accumulation continues expanding across Ethereum treasuries.

Corporate holdings now exceed 5.16 million ETH, while the Foundation’s treasury has declined to roughly 169,863 ETH. This evolving dynamic suggests a gradual shift toward institution-backed capital formation within Ethereum’s funding model.

Ethereum Foundation shifts toward OTC treasury sales The Ethereum Foundation continues managing its treasury through measured ETH sales designed to sustain long-term development funding. On-chain data shows the Foundation currently holds about 169,863 Ethereum, valued near $359 million.

Historically, the Foundation sold ETH periodically to fund research, grants, and ecosystem initiatives. Earlier transactions often moved through centralized exchanges, which occasionally raised concerns about short-term market pressure.

Over time, a gradual shift toward OTC transactions has emerged. The recent 5,000 ETH sale to BitMine, which is near $2,042 per ETH to BitMine, illustrates this approach.

Private placements reduce slippage and limit visible sell pressure, which helps stabilize sentiment. Within this structure, institutional treasuries are steadily expanding exposure, now holding over 5.16 million ETH, reinforcing Ethereum’s evolving capital formation model.

Institutional treasury deals reshape Ethereum funding Following the Foundation’s shift toward OTC treasury sales, Ethereum’s funding model appears to be entering a new phase. Instead of relying solely on ICOs, venture funding, or grant programs, foundations may increasingly route capital through direct institutional placements.

The recent 5,000 Ethereum transaction illustrates this structure. Rather than flooding exchanges, supply moved directly into a corporate treasury. This process redistributes tokens from a periodic seller to longer-term balance sheets.

Source: EthereumTreasuries Institutional holdings already exceed 5.15 million ETH across 17 entities, far above the Foundation’s 169,863 ETH reserve. Such absorption can reduce visible selling pressure and strengthen ecosystem investment.

However, rising concentration among large holders introduces governance concerns, which keeps transparency and decentralization central to the evolving funding debate.

Final Summary The Ethereum treasury’s OTC sales are shifting ecosystem funding from exchange liquidations toward institutional balance sheets. Ethereum institutional accumulation may reduce market sell pressure while raising new governance and transparency concerns.

TLDR: Venus Protocol lost $3.7M in a flash loan attack using THE token as collateral. THE token price surged to $0.563 before collapsing to $0.22 during liquidation events. Six Venus markets including BCH and LTC were temporarily frozen after the exploit. Borrowing and withdrawals for THE token paused while investigation continues. Venus Protocol flash loan attack on BNB Chain caused over $3.7 million in losses. THE token was exploited to manipulate collateral, enabling the attacker to borrow high-value assets before the market collapsed.

Exploit Mechanics and Borrowing Strategy The Venus Protocol flash loan attack targeted the Core Pool on BNB Chain, using THE token as collateral. The attacker accumulated approximately 84% of THE supply over nine months to prepare for the exploit.

Instead of following the standard deposit process, the attacker directly transferred tokens to the vTHE contract. This allowed collateral positions far above the supply cap, reaching 53.2 million THE tokens, nearly 3.7 times the protocol’s limit.

On-chain data shows Venus Protocol was suspected to suffer a flash-loan attack. The attacker address 0x1a35…6231 obtained about 20 BTC, 1.5 million CAKE, and 200 BNB, totaling over $3.7 million, after using a large amount of THE as collateral on Venus to borrow CAKE, BTCB, and… pic.twitter.com/qnyISI5pp5

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) March 15, 2026

Using this inflated collateral, the attacker borrowed about 20 BTC, 1.5 million CAKE, 200 BNB, and 1.58 million USDC. 

The strategy repeated in a loop: deposit THE, borrow assets, purchase more THE, and wait for the TWAP oracle to adjust, inflating collateral value.

The manipulation caused THE’s price to spike from $0.263 to $0.563 before falling to $0.22 as liquidations occurred. This pattern mirrored prior DeFi exploits involving low-liquidity tokens and automated liquidations.

Venus Protocol Response and Market Measures Following the attack, Venus froze six high-risk markets, including BCH, LTC, UNI, AAVE, FIL, and TWT. Borrowing and withdrawals of THE tokens were temporarily paused while all other markets remained operational.

Investigations suggest the attacker may have used Tornado Cash to fund operations. Venus has since tightened collateral rules and plans to review oracle mechanisms to prevent similar attacks in the future.

The estimated bad debt ranges from $1.7 million to $2.15 million, mainly from the CAKE market. The protocol confirmed the unusual activity was confined to the THE and CAKE markets and did not affect the broader ecosystem.

Security analysts continue monitoring Venus to assess the handling of low-liquidity tokens. Investors are advised to exercise caution when lending or borrowing such tokens, ensuring robust protocols are in place to minimize risk.

TLDR: Draft $5M deal from lobbyist Novelli links Milei to Libra token promotion. Milei exchanged messages with Novelli when the token contract was posted on X. Libra token briefly reached $4B market cap before collapsing 94% within hours. Authorities froze Hayden Davis’s assets; an investigation into payments and communications is ongoing. Argentine President Linked to $5 Million Libra Token Agreement is under investigation after forensic analysis revealed a draft $5 million deal associated with the promotion of the Libra token, which briefly surged in market value.

Draft Deal and Payment Structure Argentine President Linked to $5 Million Libra Token Agreement came to light after authorities examined Mauricio Novelli’s phone during a judicial probe. 

The recovered draft document, reportedly written on February 11, 2025, outlines a total $5 million payment plan.

The draft divided payments into three segments. The first installment of $1.5 million would be delivered in tokens or cash as an advance. 

A second $1.5 million was tied to a public endorsement of crypto entrepreneur Hayden Davis on X. The remaining $2 million involved a consulting contract with President Milei and his sister Karina for blockchain or AI services.

Investigators noted the draft did not specify the ultimate recipient of the funds. Screenshots of the document surfaced after prosecutors disclosed material previously held since November. 

$5M Draft Deal Found Linking Milei to $LIBRA Promotion

Forensic analysis of lobbyist Mauricio Novelli's phone revealed a draft $5M payment deal tied to Argentine President Milei's LIBRA token promotion.

Deal Structure (Written Feb 11, 2025 – 3 Days Before Milei's Tweet):
✅… pic.twitter.com/11ERGw4qZO

— Crypto Patel (@CryptoPatel) March 15, 2026

Experts confirmed the contract code referenced in the draft was not publicly available at the time of Milei’s social media post, adding context to the timing of the promotion.

Authorities are still evaluating whether the draft agreement was executed. The recovered messages suggest coordination between Novelli and Milei surrounding the token promotion. 

Deleted chats partially recovered from Novelli’s phone also indicated he helped prepare Milei’s public response following the controversy.

Communication and Market Reaction Digital forensic analysis revealed that Milei exchanged five messages with Novelli at the exact moment he posted the Libra token contract on X. The contract’s publication coincided with a rapid market surge, temporarily raising the token’s value to $4 billion.

The following hours saw the Libra token collapse by 94%, affecting more than 44,000 investors. Authorities have since frozen Hayden Davis’s assets while the investigation continues. 

Novelli’s call records also show contact with Milei and his sister before and after the announcement. Multiple calls with presidential adviser Santiago Caputo were recorded as the government managed the controversy.

Another note, dated February 16, outlined a public statement designed to support the Libra token while denying direct financial involvement. Officials suggest it may have been intended for Milei to post on social media. 

Milei has publicly denied active promotion, stating he merely shared information about the token.

The investigation remains ongoing as prosecutors review recovered communications, asset records, and other digital evidence. Further findings could clarify whether any financial arrangement linked to the Libra token promotion actually occurred.

The key differences between ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats® ETF (NOBL +0.09%) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV 0.51%) come down to cost, yield, recent performance, and sector exposure. FDVV offers lower fees, a higher payout, and more tech exposure, while NOBL sticks to equal-weighted Dividend Aristocrats® with a defensive tilt.

NOBL and FDVV both target dividend-focused U.S. stocks, but their approaches and results diverge. NOBL tracks a strict list of S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats® with an equal-weighted, sector-capped methodology, while FDVV selects for high dividend yield with sector tilts. This comparison breaks down how each ETF stacks up for cost, returns, risk, and portfolio makeup as of March 2026.

Snapshot (cost & size)MetricNOBLFDVVIssuerProSharesFidelityExpense ratio0.35%0.15%1-yr return (as of 2026-03-13)8.6%16.5%Dividend yield1.94%2.77%Beta0.760.80AUM$12.01 billion$8.86 billionBeta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

FDVV is more affordable, charging a 0.15% expense ratio compared to NOBL’s 0.35%. It also offers a higher dividend yield of 2.77%, outpacing NOBL’s 1.94%.

Performance & risk comparisonMetricNOBLFDVVMax drawdown (5 y)-17.92%-20.17%Growth of $1,000 over 5 years$1,396$1,858What's insideFDVV holds 107 stocks and has been operating for 10 years. Its portfolio leans toward technology (25%), financial services (17%), and consumer cyclical (16%) stocks, with top holdings such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. The fund aims for high relative yield using sector tilts, which can introduce more growth-oriented names alongside dividend payers.

NOBL, by contrast, invests in 70 S&P 500 companies with at least 25 consecutive years of dividend growth, capping sector weights at 30%. Its largest allocations are in consumer defensive (25%), industrials (20%), and financial services (12%), featuring Target, Johnson & Johnson, and Chevron, among its top holdings. NOBL’s equal-weighted, rules-based approach keeps it more defensive and less concentrated in growth stocks.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investorsOver the last decade, the S&P 500 has delivered total returns of 14.4% annually, outpacing FDVV’s 12.7% clip and NOBL’s 9.8%. Despite this “underperformance” (in quotations because the dividend ETF’s results are actually in line, if not above, the long-term historical returns of the market), FDVV and NOBL are both attractive ETFs for dividend investors in their own ways.

For investors who don’t hold an S&P 500 ETF in their portfolio, FDVV may be an ETF to consider. Its largest holdings are all Magnificent Seven members, helping the index mimic the broader S&P 500 to an extent, as its total returns show. On top of that, its 2.77% dividend yield nearly triples the S&P 500’s 1.06% payout, making it a much more appealing income option than the broader index.

However, if an investor already has exposure to the S&P 500 or is looking to add some stability to their portfolio, NOBL may be the better ETF. While its returns have lagged over the last decade, in what was largely a bull market, NOBL consists of blue chip dividend stocks operating across numerous industries, making it less reliant on mega-cap tech stocks. If you’re tech-averse or think that area of the market is frothy right now, NOBL’s stability could be perfect for you.

Personally, if I had to pick between the two dividend ETFs, I would lean toward NOBL. While I don’t specifically own an S&P 500 ETF, I already have ample exposure to the Magnificent Seven, Nvidia, and the like, so I think NOBL’s counter-positioning in less popular industries right now would benefit my portfolio. While NOBL’s expense ratio of 0.35% is higher than FDVV’s, it isn’t outrageous compared to other dividend ETFs. Meanwhile, NOBL has grown its dividend payments by 8.4% annually over the last decade, offsetting this fee nicely.

Kerrisdale Advisers initiated a new position in Telephone and Data Systems (TDS 0.73%), acquiring 506,067 shares in the fourth quarter, valued at $20.75 million based on quarter-end pricing, according to a February 17, 2026, SEC filing.

What happenedAccording to a February 17, 2026, SEC filing, Kerrisdale Advisers initiated a new position in Telephone and Data Systems (TDS 0.73%), acquiring 506,067 shares during the fourth quarter of 2025. The quarter-end value of the TDS stake increased by $20.75 million as a result of the new purchase.

What else to knowTop five holdings after the filing:NYSE:TDS: $20.75 million (9.8% of AUM)NASDAQ:MELI: $17.25 million (8.1% of AUM)NYSE:SYY: $15.57 million (7.3% of AUM)NYSE:V: $13.84 million (6.5% of AUM)NASDAQ:ACMR: $10.39 million (4.9% of AUM)As of February 16, 2026, TDS shares were priced at $47.59, up 25% over the past year and outperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 20% gain in the same period.Company overviewMetricValueRevenue (TTM)$1.2 billionNet Income (TTM)($75.5 million)Dividend Yield0.4%Price (as of market close February 16, 2026)$47.59Company snapshotTelephone and Data Systems offers wireless solutions, IoT connectivity, broadband, cloud TV, and telecommunications services through UScellular and TDS Telecom segments.The firm generates revenue primarily from wireless service subscriptions, device sales, broadband internet, and managed telecom solutions for both consumer and business markets.It serves individual consumers, businesses, and government clients across the United States, with a significant presence in wireless and wireline connections.Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. is a diversified telecommunications provider with a national footprint in wireless and broadband services. The company leverages its integrated platform to address both consumer and enterprise connectivity needs, positioning itself as a key regional player in the U.S. communications sector. Strategic investments in IoT and next-generation network solutions support its competitive differentiation and long-term growth objectives.

What this transaction means for investorsTelephone and Data Systems spent much of the past year reshaping its operations. Management sold off parts of its wireless business and leaned more heavily into fiber broadband and tower infrastructure through its Array unit, moves designed to simplify the company and strengthen its balance sheet. Those changes already show early financial improvement. In the fourth quarter, TDS reported $330.7 million in operating revenue, up from $295.3 million a year earlier, while net income jumped to $37.2 million, a sharp turnaround from barely breakeven the prior year. For the full year, the company generated $1.23 billion in revenue and returned to profitability after posting losses in 2024.

Within the portfolio, the position also fits alongside a mix of global technology, payments, and commerce companies like MercadoLibre and Visa. That combination suggests a strategy focused on durable cash-generating businesses rather than pure growth bets.

For long-term investors, the story is less about telecom growth and more about execution. If fiber expansion and asset monetization continue to improve profitability, a quiet telecom operator could become a surprisingly steady compounder.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends MercadoLibre, Sysco, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

'The Big Money Show' reacts to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink saying America lacks enough skilled workers for a coming infrastructure boom. 0:00 Introduction to BlackRock's Woke Era Stance 3:11 Larry Fink's "Woke Era" Confession 4:11 CEO Accountability and Riding the "Woke Wave" 5:55 BlackRock's Business Opportunities & Hypocrisy 7:07 Private Credit Fund Underperformance 7:46 Scrutiny on BlackRock's Charitable Donation

On February 17, 2026, OrbiMed Advisors reported selling 143,304 shares of Sionna Therapeutics (SION +1.75%), an estimated $5.43 million trade based on quarterly average pricing.

What happenedAccording to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated February 17, 2026, OrbiMed Advisors reduced its Sionna Therapeutics position by 143,304 shares during the fourth quarter. The estimated transaction value is $5.43 million, calculated using the mean unadjusted closing price for the quarter. The quarter-end position value increased by $37.56 million, reflecting both trading activity and price appreciation.

What else to knowOrbiMed Advisors’ Sionna Therapeutics holding now constitutes 2.99% of its 13F reportable AUM following the sale.Top holdings after the filing:NASDAQ: EWTX: $385,091,379 (7.9% of AUM)NYSE: LLY: $323,693,616 (6.7% of AUM)NYSE: BSX: $230,680,255 (4.7% of AUM)NASDAQ: SVA: $184,466,170 (3.8% of AUM)NYSE: EW: $157,107,225 (3.2% of AUM)As of Friday, SION shares were priced at $37.32, up 118% over the past year and vastly outperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 20% gain in the same period.Company overviewMetricValuePrice (as of Friday)$37.32Market Capitalization$1.68 billionNet Income (TTM)($75.27 million)Company snapshotSionna Therapeutics develops biopharmaceutical products focused on treatments for cystic fibrosis, targeting normalization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function.The firm operates a research-driven business model, generating value through the discovery and clinical development of novel therapies, with revenue potential primarily from future product approvals and licensing.It serves healthcare providers, specialty clinics, and patients affected by cystic fibrosis, with a primary focus on the rare disease and biotechnology markets.Sionna Therapeutics, Inc. is a biotechnology company specializing in the development of innovative therapies for cystic fibrosis. The company's strategy centers on advancing medicines that address the underlying cause of the disease by targeting CFTR protein dysfunction.

What this transaction means for investorsWhen a clinical-stage biotech stock more than doubles in a year, trimming a position can simply reflect risk management rather than fading conviction. That dynamic often appears in healthcare-focused portfolios, where investors balance high-upside drug development bets with more stable holdings across the broader healthcare ecosystem.

Sionna Therapeutics seems to fit squarely in that high-risk, high-reward category. The company is developing therapies designed to restore function of the CFTR protein, the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis. Unlike many biotech firms still searching for capital, Sionna is entering its next phase of clinical development with financial flexibility. The company ended 2025 with about $310 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, which management expects will fund operations into 2028.

The pipeline is also progressing. A Phase 2a proof-of-concept trial evaluating its NBD1 stabilizer SION-719 is underway, while another early-stage trial studying combination therapies is expected to produce topline data in mid-2026. With the firm still commanding a nearly $150 million position within this portfolio, it really seems like this wasn’t a conviction call at all.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Edwards Lifesciences. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (NASDAQ: EOSE) between November 5, 2025 and February 26, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 5, 2026.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Eos Energy securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Eos Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18041 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 5, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Eos Energy was unable to achieve the ramp in production and capacity utilization required to achieve its previously set guidance; (2) Eos Energy's battery line downtime was running well above industry norms, the design intent of the line, and internal forecasts; (3) Eos Energy was experiencing delays in the ability for its automated bipolar production to hit quality targets; (4) Eos Energy's inadequate systems and processes prevented it from ensuring reasonably accurate guidance and that its public disclosures were timely, accurate, and complete; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Eos Energy's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Eos Energy class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=18041 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/288534

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

On February 17, 2026, Elizabeth Park Capital Advisors disclosed a sale of 23,200 shares of UMB Financial (UMBF 1.39%), an estimated $2.63 million trade based on quarterly average pricing.

What happenedAccording to an SEC filing dated February 17, 2026, Elizabeth Park Capital Advisors, Ltd. sold 23,200 shares of UMB Financial in the fourth quarter of 2025. The estimated value of the trade was $2.63 million, calculated using the average closing price during the quarter. The quarter-end value of the position declined by $2.77 million, a change that includes both the share sale and price movement.

What else to knowThis was a sale, reducing the UMBF stake to 0.69% of the fund’s 13F reportable assets under managementTop holdings after the filing:NASDAQ: QCRH: $7.09 million (5.8% of AUM)NYSE: OBK: $4.74 million (3.9% of AUM)NYSE: CFG: $4.58 million (3.8% of AUM)NASDAQ: HBNC: $4.35 million (3.6% of AUM)NASDAQ: VLY: $4.19 million (3.5% of AUM)As of February 17, 2026, shares were priced at $127.77, up 13.8% over the past year and underperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 20% gain in the same period.Company overviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close 2026-02-17)$127.77Market Capitalization$9.70 billionRevenue (TTM)$2.43 billionNet Income (TTM)$702.40 millionCompany snapshotUMB Financial offers commercial and personal banking, institutional asset management, fund administration, healthcare payment solutions, and a range of treasury and lending services.The bank generates revenue primarily from interest income, fee-based services, asset management, and transaction processing across regional banking and institutional financial services.It serves commercial clients, institutional investors, healthcare providers, and retail consumers across 15 U.S. states, with a diversified customer base spanning businesses and individuals.UMB Financial is a regional financial services provider with a diversified business model spanning commercial, institutional, and personal banking. The company leverages its broad product suite and multi-state branch network to serve a wide range of clients, from businesses and institutional investors to individual consumers.

What this transaction means for investorsRegional banks surely aren’t known for delivering the explosive moves seen in growth stocks, but they can quietly compound value when earnings growth and balance sheet expansion move in the right direction, and that’s the lens long-term investors should apply when evaluating UMB Financial.

The Kansas City–based lender is coming off a year of very solid growth. Fourth-quarter revenue reached about $720.9 million, up 66% from the prior year, while net income available to common shareholders climbed to roughly $209.5 million, a 75% increase year over year. Much of that momentum reflects the company’s recently completed acquisition of Heartland Financial, a deal that expanded the bank’s geographic reach and helped boost interest income across its lending and deposit franchise.

Despite those gains, the stock’s roughly 14% climb over the past year still trails the broader market. That relative underperformance may explain why some investors are trimming exposure after the bank’s strong earnings expansion.

Within the broader portfolio, the position is modest compared with several other regional banking investments, including holdings in institutions like QCR Holdings, Origin Bancorp, and Citizens Financial. Ultimately, it seems that positioning suggests the investment functions as part of a diversified bet on regional lenders rather than a core anchor, but the bank’s recent performance suggests it still has room to run.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

HomeMarketsU.S. & CanadaFutures MoversFutures MoversLast Updated: March 15, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. ET
First Published: March 15, 2026 at 6:21 p.m. ET

U.S. stock-index futures declined on Sunday as the market braced for another surge in oil prices this week, with the conflict with Iran threatening to escalate further.

West Texas Intermediate crude CL.1 CLJ26, the U.S. benchmark, rose more than 2% on Sunday, above $101 a barrel. Brent crude BRN00 BRNK26, the global benchmark, rose more than 3%, above $106 a barrel. Oil prices crossed the $100-a-barrel level last week for the first time since 2022, and have surged about 40% since the start of the U.S. and Israeli bombing campaign against Iran at the end of February.

HIGHLIGHTS

May 2025 Optimised Scoping Study (OSS) outlined a compelling Tunkillia development project:[1]

Annual production: ~120,000oz gold and ~250,000oz silver

Total LoM operating cash: ~A$2.7 billion (unlevered, pre-tax)

Net Present Value (NPV7.5%): ~A$1.4 billion (unlevered, pre-tax)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR): ~73.2% (unlevered, pre-tax); and

Payback period: ~0.8 years (unlevered, pre-tax)

Barton expediting Tunkillia toward Mining Lease (ML) application, with AUD gold and silver prices now over $2,000/oz and $60/oz higher (respectively) than used for OSS revenue estimates1

18,900m ‘Phase 1' reverse circulation (RC) Resource upgrade drilling infilled high value S1 / S2 pit areas with broad high-grade intersections, supporting rapid payback in early ‘Starter pit'2; ~30,000m ‘Phase 2' RC upgrade drilling now underway targeting balance of optimised open pits;

Phase 2 RC drilling a key step to support JORC (2012) Mineral Resource upgrades and target JORC (2012) Ore Reserves, a pre-feasibility study (PFS), and an ML application by end of 2026

ADELAIDE, AU / ACCESS Newswire / March 15, 2026 / Barton Gold Holdings Limited (ASX:BGD)(OTCQB:BGDFF)(FRA:BGD3) (Barton or Company) is pleased to announce the start of ‘Phase 2' JORC (2012) Mineral Resource upgrade drilling at its South Australian Tunkillia Gold Project (Tunkillia). Strike Drilling has been engaged to complete a program totalling ~30,000m.

Tunkillia's Phase 2 RC upgrade drilling follows a successful 'Phase 1' program which infilled the high-value early 'S1' and 'S2' pit areas, modelled to produce ~$1.3 billion operating profit during the first 2.5 years of operation, with broad, high-grade intersections. Barton is targeting conversion of all of Tunkillia's OSS modelled open pit mineralisation to JORC (2012) ‘Measured' and ‘Indicated' categories to accelerate financing and development.2

Full details can be accessed in the complete announcement on the ASX website or directly by clicking here.

Commenting on Tunkillia's ongoing development drilling programs, Barton MD Alexander Scanlon said:

"The Tunkillia OSS demonstrated the financial and capital leverage available to large-scale bulk processing operations, with the major advantage of a higher-grade ‘Starter Pit' that can pay back development costs 2x over in the first year - assuming A$5,000/oz gold and A$50/oz silver prices. At current gold and silver prices, Tunkillia would be modelled to produce over $1 billion operating profit in the first year, and over $2 billion operating profit in the first two years.

"Our recent 'Phase 1' Resource upgrade drilling results further confirmed the mineralisation behind these compelling economics; we are therefore now executing the balance of Tunkillia development drilling programs on an expedited timeline, targeting declared JORC Ore Reserves, a robust PFS, and a Mining Lease application by the end of 2026.

"Following the submission of our Mining Lease application, we will expedite Tunkillia's project finance discussions and work with all key stakeholders including the South Australian Government to bring Tunkillia online as soon as possible. This project can generate substantial economic benefits for Barton and all of our stakeholders, including the State."

1 Refer to ASX announcement dated 5 May 2025

2 Refer to ASX announcements dated 2 / 16 December 2025 and 21 January 2026

Authorised by the Managing Director of Barton Gold Holdings Limited.

For further information, please contact:

About Barton Gold
Barton Gold is an ASX, OTCQB and Frankfurt Stock Exchange listed Australian gold developer targeting future gold production of 150,000ozpa with 2.2Moz Au & 3.1Moz Ag JORC Mineral Resources (79.9Mt @ 0.87g/t Au), brownfield mines, and 100% ownership of the region's only gold mill in the renowned Gawler Craton of South Australia.*

Challenger Gold Project

313koz Au + fully permitted Central Gawler Mill (CGM)

Tarcoola Gold Project

20koz Au in fully permitted open pit mine near CGM

Tolmer discovery grades up to 84g/t Au & 17,600g/t Ag

Tunkillia Gold Project

1.6Moz Au & 3.1Moz Ag JORC Mineral Resources

Competitive 120kozpa gold & 250kozpa silver project

Wudinna Gold Project

279koz Au project located southeast of Tunkillia

Significant optionality, adjacent to main highway

Competent Persons Statement & Previously Reported Information
The information in this announcement that relates to the historic Exploration Results and Mineral Resources as listed in the table below is based on, and fairly represents, information and supporting documentation prepared by the Competent Person whose name appears in the same row, who is an employee of or independent consultant to the Company and is a Member or Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM), Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) or a Recognised Professional Organisation (RPO). Each person named in the table below has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and types of deposits under consideration and to the activity which he has undertaken to quality as a Competent Person as defined in the JORC Code 2012 (JORC).

*Refer to Barton Prospectus dated 14 May 2021 and ASX announcement dated 8 September 2025. Total Barton JORC (2012) Mineral Resources include 1,049koz Au (39.7Mt @ 0.82 g/t Au) in Indicated category and 1,186koz Au (40.2Mt @ 0.92 g/t Au) in Inferred category, and 3,070koz Ag (34.5Mt @ 2.80 g/t Ag) in Inferred category as a subset of Tunkillia gold JORC (2012) Mineral Resources.

Activity

Competent Person

Membership

Status

Tarcoola Mineral Resource (Stockpiles)

Dr Andrew Fowler (Consultant)

AusIMM

Member

Tarcoola Mineral Resource (Perseverance Mine)

Mr Ian Taylor (Consultant)

AusIMM

Fellow

Tarcoola Exploration Results (until 15 Nov 2021)

Mr Colin Skidmore (Consultant)

AIG

Member

Tarcoola Exploration Results (after 15 Nov 2021)

Mr Marc Twining (Employee)

AusIMM

Member

Tunkillia Exploration Results (until 15 Nov 2021)

Mr Colin Skidmore (Consultant)

AIG

Member

Tunkillia Exploration Results (after 15 Nov 2021)

Mr Marc Twining (Employee)

AusIMM

Member

Tunkillia Mineral Resource

Mr Ian Taylor (Consultant)

AusIMM

Fellow

Challenger Mineral Resource (above 215mRL)

Mr Ian Taylor (Consultant)

AusIMM

Fellow

Challenger Mineral Resource (below 90mRL)

Mr Dale Sims

AusIMM / AIG

Fellow / Member

Wudinna Mineral Resource (Clarke Deposit)

Ms Justine Tracey

AusIMM

Member

Wudinna Mineral Resource (all other Deposits)

Mrs Christine Standing

AusIMM / AIG

Member / Member

The information relating to historic Exploration Results and Mineral Resources in this announcement is extracted from the Company's Prospectus dated 14 May 2021 or as otherwise noted, available from the Company's website at www.bartongold.com.au or on the ASX website www.asx.com.au. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the Exploration Results and Mineral Resource information included in previous announcements and, in the case of estimates of Mineral Resources, that all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the estimates, and any production targets and forecast financial information derived from the production targets, continue to apply and have not materially changed. In accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.19.2, the Company further confirms that the material assumptions underpinning any production targets and the forecast financial information derived therefrom continue to apply and have not materially changed. The Company confirms that the form and context in which the applicable Competent Persons' findings are presented have not been materially modified from the previous announcements.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This document may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "expect", "target" and "intend" and statements than an event or result "may", "will", "should", "would", "could", or "might" occur or be achieved and other similar expressions. Forward-looking information is subject to business, legal and economic risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, risks relating to property interests, the global economic climate, commodity prices, sovereign and legal risks, and environmental risks. Forward-looking statements are based upon estimates and opinions at the date the statements are made. Barton undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements for events or circumstances that occur subsequent to such dates or to update or keep current any of the information contained herein. Any estimates or projections as to events that may occur in the future (including projections of revenue, expense, net income and performance) are based upon the best judgment of Barton from information available as of the date of this document. There is no guarantee that any of these estimates or projections will be achieved. Actual results will vary from the projections and such variations may be material. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to the past or future. Any reliance placed by the reader on this document, or on any forward-looking statement contained in or referred to in this document will be solely at the readers own risk, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements due to the inherent uncertainty thereof.

SOURCE: Barton Gold Holdings Limited

By You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.

Oil futures climbed on Sunday as the Iran war showed no signs of slowing down. David McNew/Getty Images 2026-03-15T22:35:12.424Z

Oil climbed on Sunday as the US and Israel's war with Iran entered its third week. The near closure of the Strait of Hormuz continues to disrupt the global oil supply chain. Higher oil prices mean higher prices for Americans at the pump and in other goods. Oil futures climbed in early trading on Sunday as the US and Israel's war with Iran entered its third week, disrupting the global supply chain.

Brent oil reached $106.33, up nearly $3 from when the market closed on Friday. West Texas Intermediate hit $101.19 on Sunday.

For Americans, surging oil prices mean spending more at the pump. The national average price for gasoline hit $3.69 on Sunday. Gas prices have surpassed $3 in all 50 US states for the first time since 2023.

The International Energy Agency said last week the war has caused the largest oil market disruption in history, and that global oil supply will drop by 8 million barrels per day in March.

Kevin Hassett, the US director of the National Economic Council and a top aide to President Donald Trump, said Sunday on CBS News' "Face the Nation" that the US is working to minimize the fallout for American consumers.

"The big problem right now would be energy prices, and we're watching and monitoring closely," Hassett said.

Much of the instability in the oil market stems from the near-closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran controls and through which about 20% of the world's petroleum passes. Trump has called on other nations to help secure the strait, but has so far received either lukewarm replies or none at all.

Attacks on major oil hubs are also likely driving up prices. Trump said late Friday that the US had "totally obliterated" military targets on Iran's Kharg Island, where refineries process almost all of the nation's oil exports.

The president threatened to target oil infrastructure on the island if Iran continued to prevent ships from passing through the Strait of Hormuz. An attack on the key Iranian oil center would further destabilize the global oil market.

In response, Iran said that ports, docks, and "American hideouts" in the United Arab Emirates could be targeted. Fire later broke out near the Port of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates, the only multipurpose maritime facility on the UAE's east coast and a major oil depot, on Saturday. The local government said an intercepted drone caused the fire.

Any end to the conflict, meanwhile, appears to be a long way off. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Sunday that there has been no discussion of a ceasefire.

"We are only defending our people from this act of aggression," Araghchi said on "Face the Nation."We don't see any reason why we should talk with Americans, because we were talking with them when they decided to attack us, and that was for the second time."

oil prices Gas Donald Trump More

Read next

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 15, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Paysafe Limited (NYSE: PSFE) between March 4, 2025 and November 12, 2025, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important April 7, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Paysafe securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 7, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Paysafe's ecommerce business had significant exposure to a single high risk client; (2) as a result, Paysafe's credit loss reserves and/or write-offs were understated; (3) Paysafe had an undisclosed issue with higher risk Merchant Category Codes, making its client services difficult to bank; (4) the foregoing issues were likely to have a material negative impact on Paysafe's revenue growth and overall revenue mix; (5) as a result, Paysafe was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025; and (6) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Paysafe's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Paysafe class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=2745 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/288567

Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

What happenedAccording to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing dated February 17, 2026, Boone Capital Management established a new position in HealthEquity by purchasing 212,856 shares. The reported value of the transaction was $19,499,738, as disclosed in the filing.

This new stake brought the fund’s quarter-end holding in HealthEquity to 212,856 shares, valued at $19,499,738, reflecting the impact of both the purchase and any price movement during the period.

What else to knowThis new position brings HealthEquity to 6.12% of BOONE Capital Management’s $318.61 million in reportable U.S. equity assets as of December 31, 2025.

Top holdings after the filing:

NYSE: MDT: $41.19 million (13% of AUM)NASDAQ: MIRM: $33.27 million (10.4% of AUM)NASDAQ: IONS: $33.05 million (10.4% of AUM)NASDAQ: CI: $26.55 million (8.3% of AUM)NASDAQ: BMRN: $24.48 million (7.7% of AUM)As of February 17, 2026, shares of HealthEquity were priced at $74.36, down 34.3% over the past year, underperforming the S&P 500 by 45.93 percentage points.

Company OverviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close 2/17/26)$74.36Market Capitalization$6.43 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.29 billionNet Income (TTM)$191.83 millionCompany SnapshotHealthEquity offers cloud-based platforms for health savings accounts (HSAs), flexible spending accounts, and health reimbursement arrangements.It serves employers, benefits brokers, health plans, and individual consumers across the United States.The company provides technology-enabled healthcare financial services to streamline account management and payment solutions.HealthEquity operates as a leading provider of technology-enabled healthcare savings solutions, leveraging a cloud-based platform to deliver value to employers and individual consumers. Its integrated approach and broad client network position the company as a key player in the healthcare financial services sector.

What this transaction means for investorsBoone Capital Management’s purchase of HealthEquity stock in the fourth quarter of 2025 is a noteworthy event. The hedge fund primarily invests in healthcare companies, and its new stake in HealthEquity suggests it’s bullish on the stock.

Since Boone Capital’s Q4 investment, HealthEquity shares have dropped, hitting a 52-week low of $72.76 on Feb. 17. Despite this, the company is doing well.

HealthEquity disclosed the number of health savings accounts (HSAs) under its purview grew 7% year over year to 10.6 million in its fiscal year ended Jan. 31, 2026.  This bodes well for its fiscal 2025 full-year financial results, which the company will disclose on March 17.

In its fiscal third quarter, HealthEquity delivered sales of $322.2 million, up from $300.4 million in the previous year. Its Q3 net income rose to $51.7 million compared to $5.7 million in the prior year.

With its share price decline, HealthEquity’s forward price-to-earnings ratio has dropped to 17, a low point for the past year. This valuation suggests now is a good time to pick up shares.

Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Mirum Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool recommends BioMarin Pharmaceutical and Medtronic. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.