Market Signal Briefing

Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has been navigating a period of market pressure, yet analysts believe the asset may be preparing for a significant upward push. Despite short-term declines, BCH continues to defend important technical levels, giving traders reason to anticipate a potential breakout in the coming months.

Activity on the XRP Ledger has surged significantly in recent days, drawing strong attention from traders who are monitoring early signals of a potential price reversal. With institutional participation increasing after the introduction of the first XRP spot ETF, market momentum appears to be strengthening as on-chain activity reaches levels not seen in months.

9 minutes ago

Bitcoin’s latest tumble pushed it below the $93,507 price it entered the year at, despite the year mostly seeing positive industry developments from corporations and governments.

104

Bitcoin briefly lost all of its gains this year after the crypto markets bled over the weekend, despite the US government reopening on Thursday, which was expected to provide much-needed relief to the markets.

Bitcoin (BTC) fell to a low of $93,029 on Sunday, down 25% from its all-time high in October. It started the year at $93,507.

It has since rebounded to around $94,209, CoinGecko data shows.

Bitcoin’s price information, including the change in price since Jan. 1, 2025. Source: CoinGecko
This year was tipped to be a strong one for the crypto markets after US President Donald Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20 and formed the most pro-crypto administration to date, which has followed through on most of his promises.

Regulatory momentum under the Trump administration has been accompanied by an explosion in corporate Bitcoin treasury adoption and more inflows into the spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.

However, Trump’s war on tariffs and the US government shutdown — the latter of which ended on Thursday after a record 43 days — have contributed to multiple double-digit Bitcoin price pullbacks throughout the year.

Bitcoin whales have also slowed price ralliesAnother key catalyst seen behind Bitcoin’s price slump has been OG Bitcoiners and whales selling off portions of their holdings, compressing upside even in light of positive industry developments.

However, Glassnode analysts last week said the “OG Whales Dumping” Bitcoin narrative isn’t as strong as it is made out to be, explaining that it is “normal bull-market behaviour,” particularly during the late stages of bull runs.

“This steady rise reflects increasing distribution pressure from older investor cohorts — a pattern typical of late-cycle profit-taking, not a sudden exodus of whales.”Bitcoin isn’t alone — Ether (ETH) and Solana (SOL) are down 7.95% and 28.3% respectively from the start of 2025, while most altcoins have been hit even harder.

Four-year cycle thesis still not in effect, analyst saysIndustry analysts are also speculating whether the four-year cycle thesis remains in effect, despite the crypto markets having far more institutional and regulatory backing compared to earlier market cycles.

Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan is one of a few analysts who believe Bitcoin will boom in 2026 due to the “debasement trade” thesis playing out, while the broader markets will benefit from increased adoption in stablecoin, tokenization and decentralized finance.

“I think the underlying fundamentals are just so sound,” Hougan said last Wednesday.

“I just think those are too big to keep down. So I think 2026 will be a good year.”Magazine: If the crypto bull run is ending… it’s time to buy a Ferrari: Crypto Kid

Japan's government might finally be ready to treat crypto like it actually belongs in the financial world. The Financial Services Agency (FSA) is preparing to label Bitcoin, Ethereum, and 103 other tokens as financial products, according to what sources told Asahi Shimbun.

Harvard pushes Bitcoin stake, giving IBIT ETF a "much needed" lift.

Federal prosecutors have pushed back against Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm’s bid for a full acquittal, arguing that the evidence presented during his trial firmly supports the charges against him. In a post-trial filing submitted last Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Southern District of New York said its case clearly showed Storm helped build and control Tornado Cash, a crypto mixing platform sanctioned by the U.S. for facilitating transactions tied to North Korean hackers and other illicit actors.

Storm’s legal team previously filed a motion at the end of September asking District Judge Katherine Polk Failla to overturn not only his conviction for conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business, but also the two charges on which the jury deadlocked: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate sanctions laws. His attorneys argued that the government failed to provide enough evidence to support any of the allegations.

Prosecutors, however, disagreed, stating that testimony and documents introduced during the four-week trial demonstrated Storm’s active role in developing Tornado Cash. They highlighted how Storm and his co-founders made roughly 250 changes to the platform’s user interface between February 2020 and August 2022—modifications that shaped how users interacted with the service. According to the filing, about 96% of Tornado Cash users accessed the platform through this interface during the period when criminal activity was alleged, further underscoring Storm’s involvement and control.

The government also insisted that it had provided sufficient evidence to support the remaining conspiracy charges, urging the judge not to acquit Storm on either count. Storm’s attorneys have until this coming Wednesday to submit their response, setting the stage for the next phase of a closely watched case with major implications for crypto privacy tools and developer liability.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

By

PYMNTS
 | 
November 16, 2025

 | 

After a bad week, bitcoin could be headed into “death cross” territory.

That’s according to a report Sunday (Nov. 16) by Coindesk, which says that phrase is a technical analysis term that could denote signs of a bearish market, as it reflects waning short-term momentum compared to longer trends.

However, the report added, a death cross can also serve as a positive signal. Bitcoin is down around 25% from its record high of $126,000 in October. This would mark the fourth death cross since the cycle started in 2023, with each past instance lining up with “major local bottoms,” as Coindesk described it.

Previous bottoms came in September 2023 ($25,000), August 2024 ($49,000) and April of this year, fueled by uncertainty tied to U.S. tariff policy ($75,000).

This time, bitcoin has dropped to $94,000 and in all four past instances the market put in its low just ahead of the death cross, which Coindesk says raises the question of whether the same pattern may be happening again.

Bitcoin was down nearly 9% throughout last week, a decline triggered in part by investors selling cryptocurrency in response to a pullback in Big Tech stocks, as many of the crypto investors also have interests in tech companies.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

Those stocks had been sliding recently due to concerns about companies’ spending on artificial intelligence (AI). Days after bitcoin’s October record, the token suffered the biggest liquidation event in digital asset history, fueled by a surprise tariff announcement from the White House.

In other digital assets news, PYMNTS wrote last week about the potential limitations of blockchain-based payments. 

As that report noted, there is an ongoing industry narrative that once blockchain hits a critical mass of adoption in one area — whether that is cross-border transfers, merchant payments or remittances — its utility will naturally bleed into adjacent domains.

“However, the payments industry is deeply heterogeneous, and the challenges that blockchain can solve in one vertical may not translate neatly to others,” the report added.

“Looking ahead, it is entirely plausible that blockchain payments could expand through a series of vertical footholds rather than a broad-based platform expansion. Each foothold may be defined by specific economic pain points, like invoice reconciliation, loyalty point settlement, corporate treasury netting and tax operation, rather than general-purpose transactions.”

November 16, 2025 4:00 PM EST | Source: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
San Diego, California--(Newsfile Corp. - November 16, 2025) - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Firefly Aerospace Inc. (NASDAQ: FLY): (i) securities between August 7, 2025 and September 29, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"); and/or (ii) common stock pursuant and/or traceable to Firefly Aerospace's offering documents issued in connection with Firefly Aerospace's August 7, 2025 initial public offering (the "IPO"), have until January 12, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit. Captioned Diamond v. Firefly Aerospace Inc., No. 25-cv-01812 (W.D. Tex.), the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit charges Firefly Aerospace and certain of Firefly Aerospace's top executives and directors with violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-firefly-aerospace-inc-class-action-lawsuit-fly.html

You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected].

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Firefly Aerospace operates as a space and defense technology company and provides mission solutions for national security, government, and commercial customers. According to the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit, on or about August 7, 2025, Firefly Aerospace conducted its IPO, issuing approximately 19.3 million shares of common stock to the public at the offering price of $45.00 per share.

The Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period and in the IPO's offering documents made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Firefly Aerospace had overstated the demand and growth prospects for its Spacecraft Solutions offerings; (ii) Firefly Aerospace had overstated the operational readiness and commercial viability of its Alpha rocket program; and (iii) the foregoing, once revealed, would likely have a material negative impact on Firefly Aerospace.

The Firefly Aerospace investor class action alleges that on September 22, 2025 Firefly Aerospace reported its first earnings report as a public company and, among other items, revealed a loss of $80.3 million for the second quarter of 2025 compared to $58.7 million for the same quarter in 2024. Firefly Aerospace also reported revenue of $15.55 million, below analyst estimates of $17.25 million and down 26.2% from the same quarter in 2024, the complaint alleges. Significantly, Firefly Aerospace reported revenue of only $9.2 million in its Spacecraft Solutions business segment, representing a 49% year-over-year decrease, the Firefly Aerospace shareholder class action alleges. On this news, the price of Firefly Aerospace's shares fell more than 15%, the lawsuit alleges.

Then, the Firefly Aerospace class action alleges that on September 29, 2025, Firefly Aerospace disclosed that "the first stage of Firefly's Alpha Flight 7 rocket experienced an event that resulted in a loss of the stage." On this news, the price of Firefly Aerospace's shares fell more than 20%, the complaint alleges.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Firefly Aerospace securities during the Class Period and/or common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Firefly Aerospace investor class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Firefly Aerospace shareholder class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Firefly Aerospace class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases — more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever — $7.2 billion — in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

Contact:
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
800-449-4900
[email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/274531

November 16, 2025 4:05 PM EST | Source: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
San Diego, California--(Newsfile Corp. - November 16, 2025) - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Stride, Inc. (NYSE: LRN) securities between October 22, 2024 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), have until January 12, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Stride class action lawsuit. Captioned MacMahon v. Stride, Inc., No. 25-cv-02019 (E.D. Va.), the Stride class action lawsuit charges Stride and certain of Stride's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Stride class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-stride-inc-class-action-lawsuit-lrn.html

You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected].

CASE ALLEGATIONS: Stride provides proprietary and third-party online curriculum, software systems, and educational services.

The Stride class action lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statement and/or failed to disclose that Stride was: (i) inflating enrollment numbers by retaining "ghost students"; (ii) cutting staffing costs by assigning teachers' caseloads far beyond the required statutory limits; (iii) ignoring compliance requirements, including background checks and licensure laws for its employees, and ignoring federally mandated special education services to students; (iv) suppressing whistleblowers who documented financial directives from Stride's leadership to delay hiring and deny services to preserve profit margins; and (v) losing existing and potential enrollments.

The Stride class action lawsuit further alleges that on September 14, 2025, a report stated that the Gallup-McKinley County Schools Board of Education had filed a complaint against Stride, alleging fraud, deceptive trade practices, systemic violations of law, and intentional and tortious misconduct, including inflating enrollment numbers by retaining "ghost students" on rolls to secure state funding per student and ignoring compliance requirements, including background checks and licensure laws for its employees. On this news, the price of Stride stock fell nearly 12%, according to the complaint.

Then, on October 28, 2025, the complaint alleges that Stride announced that "poor customer experience" had resulted in "higher withdrawal rates," "lower conversion rates," and had driven students away. The Stride class action lawsuit further alleges that Stride estimated the impact caused approximately 10,000-15,000 fewer enrollments and stated that, because of this, its outlook is "muted" compared to prior years. On this news, the price of Stride stock fell more than 54%, according to the complaint.

THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Stride securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Stride class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Stride class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Stride class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Stride class action lawsuit.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases — more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever — $7.2 billion — in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:

https://www.rgrdlaw.com/services-litigation-securities-fraud.html

Attorney advertising.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

Contact:
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101
800-449-4900
[email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/274534

A catalyst-driven fund is unwinding a big winner—just as the underlying business hits record results.

On Friday, Denver-based 1060 Capital Management disclosed in an SEC filing that it sold out its entire position in MYR Group (MYRG +4.30%), a move representing a net change of $5.9 million.

What HappenedAccording to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission released Friday, 1060 Capital sold its entire stake in MYR Group during the third quarter. The move involved the disposition of all 32,500 previously held shares, reducing the position value to zero. The estimated value of the transaction was $5.9 million based on quarterly average pricing.

What Else to KnowTop holdings after the filing: 

NYSE:RSI: $9.2 million (31.3% of AUM)NYSE:PRIM: $6.9 million (23.3% of AUM)NASDAQ:LULU: $5.3 million (18.1% of AUM)NYSE:NVRI: $4.2 million (14.1% of AUM)NYSE:MTZ: $2.1 million (7.2% of AUM)As of Friday, shares of MYR Group were priced at $229.44, up 52.6% over the past year and well outperforming the S&P 500, which is up about 13% in the same period. MYR Group stock is currently 4.9% below its 52-week high.

Company OverviewMetricValuePrice (as of market close Friday)$229.44Market capitalization$3.6 billionRevenue (TTM)$3.5 billionNet income (TTM)$97.8 millionCompany SnapshotMYR Group is a leading provider of electrical construction services with a diversified portfolio across transmission, distribution, and commercial/industrial projects. The company leverages its scale and technical expertise to deliver critical infrastructure solutions for utilities and large-scale commercial clients. MYR Group serves investor-owned utilities, cooperatives, independent power producers, government agencies, commercial and industrial facility owners, and general contractors in the United States and Canada. Its broad customer base and long-standing industry presence support a resilient business model and competitive positioning in the North American market.

Foolish TakeFor long-term investors, 1060 Capital’s move matters because it fits a broader pattern: The firm has only 10 reported holdings, and it's been cycling out of names where it presumably thinks original catalysts have largely played out. Last quarter, the fund also sold Brightstar Lottery and Armstrong World Industries—while adding Lululemon and building a sizable Tesla put position. In a portfolio built around high-conviction, catalyst-driven bets, MYR’s near-all-time-high stock price has likely left fewer ways to “win” relative to more contrarian opportunities.

As for fundamentals, MYR's third-quarter revenue rose to $950.4 million (up 7% year over year), gross margins expanded to 11.8% from 8.7%, and EBITDA nearly doubled to $62.7 million. That's all while net income jumped to a record $32.1 million, and free cash flow strengthened materially. Shares are up more than 50% over the past year and sit just 4.9% below their 52-week high.

Ultimately, it appears MYR remains a high-quality operator, but for deep fundamental investors, future upside increasingly depends on continued execution rather than mean reversion—making patience essential at these levels and potentially coming at a higher opportunity cost as new catalysts emerge.

Glossary13F reportable assets: Assets that institutional investment managers must report quarterly to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 13F.
AUM (Assets Under Management): The total market value of investments managed on behalf of clients by a fund or firm.
Quarterly average pricing: The average price of a security over a specific quarter, used to estimate transaction values.
Trailing twelve months (TTM): The 12-month period ending with the most recent quarterly report.
Disposition: The act of selling or otherwise removing an asset from a portfolio.
Transmission and distribution network projects: Infrastructure projects that deliver electricity from power plants to end users through high-voltage lines and substations.
Investor-owned utilities: Privately owned electric, gas, or water utilities that are operated for profit.
Independent power producers: Companies that generate electricity for sale to utilities or end users but are not utility companies themselves.
General contractors: Firms responsible for overseeing and managing construction projects, hiring subcontractors, and ensuring project completion.
Commercial/industrial wiring installations: Electrical systems installed in business or industrial facilities to provide power and lighting.
Competitive positioning: How a company differentiates itself and maintains an advantage over competitors in its industry.

Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool recommends MasTec. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

PERTH, Australia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Rio Tinto has signed a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) with Australian environmental technology company Calix to support construction of Calix's Zero Emissions Steel Technology (Zesty™) demonstration plant in Western Australia, which could enable Pilbara iron ores to be used in lower-emissions steel making. If approved, the demonstration plant will be built at a site in Kwinana, south of Perth, that had been earmarked for Rio Tinto's previously announced Bio.

Pratt & Whitney is in discussions with Airbus about engine supplies over the next three years as the planemaker looks to increase production of its best-selling A320neo model, the engine maker's top commercial executive said on Sunday.

November 16, 2025 5:16 PM EST | Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - November 16, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Marex Group plc (NASDAQ: MRX) between May 16, 2024 and August 5, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important December 8, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Marex securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Marex class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43100 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than December 8, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Marex sold over-the-counter financial instruments to itself; (2) Marex had inconsistencies in its financial statements between its subsidiaries and related parties, including as to intercompany receivables and loans; (3) as a result of the foregoing, Marex's financial statements could not be relied upon; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Marex's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Marex class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=43100 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/274632

This midcap building materials stock has rallied in recent years—and that may be why this fund just dumped its entire stake.

As of September 30, Denver-based 1060 Capital Management fully exited its position in Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI 1.04%) for an estimated $5.7 million

What HappenedAccording to an SEC filing on Friday, 1060 Capital fully liquidated its holding in Armstrong World Industries (AWI 1.04%) during the third quarter. The fund sold all 35,000 shares it previously held, eliminating a stake that had represented 12% of its reportable assets.

What Else to KnowTop holdings after the filing: 

NYSE:RSI: $9.2 million (31.3% of AUM)NYSE:PRIM: $6.9 million (23.3% of AUM)NASDAQ:LULU: $5.3 million (18.1% of AUM)NYSE:NVRI: $4.2 million (14.1% of AUM)NYSE:MTZ: $2.1 million (7.2% of AUM)As of Friday, Armstrong World Industries shares were priced at $182.66, up 19% over the past year and outperforming the S&P 500, which is up 13% in the same period.

Company OverviewMetricValueRevenue (TTM)$1.6 billionNet Income (TTM)$305.4 millionDividend Yield0.7%Price (as of market close Friday)$182.66Company SnapshotArmstrong World Industries, Inc. is a leading provider of ceiling and wall systems, leveraging a broad product portfolio and established distribution channels to serve the construction industry. It designs and manufactures mineral fiber, fiberglass, metal, and specialty ceiling and wall systems, with revenue primarily from commercial and residential construction and renovation projects in North America. The company's scale, product diversity, and focus on acoustical and architectural solutions position it competitively in both commercial and residential markets. Plus, it operates a business model focused on product innovation, manufacturing, and distribution, generating income through sales to distributors, contractors, wholesalers, and retailers.

Foolish TakeShares of Armstrong World Industries have outperformed the broader market this year, and that may be why 1060 Capital decided to dump its stake, especially considering its investment strategy and other moves last quarter. The fund, which hunts for situations where markets misprice catalysts, also shed MYR Group and Brightstar Lottery last quarter (another strong performer and a weak one, respectively). That rotation, paired with fresh stakes in Lululemon and a sizable Tesla put position, suggests 1060 is reallocating toward ideas where its contrarian view has more room to play out.

Armstrong’s execution, for its part, has been impressive. Third-quarter net sales rose 10% to $425 million, driven by 18% and 6% growth in its architectural specialties and mineral fiber segments, respectively. Meanwhile, adjusted EPS jumped 13% to $2.05, and year-to-date adjusted free cash flow surged 22%. Management even raised full-year guidance across revenue, EBITDA, EPS, and free cash flow—hardly the profile of a business losing steam. Shares are up 19% over the past year, outpacing the S&P 500.

Against 1060’s concentrated holdings—RSI, Primoris, Lululemon, and NVRI—Armstrong now might represent a thesis largely priced in rather than a catalyst waiting to be unlocked. But that doesn't necessarily mean long-term holders are in for losses—just that this investment fund might be eyeing more thesis-driven plays.

GlossaryAssets Under Management (AUM): The total market value of investments managed by a fund or investment firm.
Reportable Assets: Investments that must be disclosed in regulatory filings, such as those required by the SEC.
Fully Exited: When an investor sells all shares of a particular holding, reducing its position to zero.
Divestment: The process of selling off an asset or investment position.
13F Filing: A quarterly report required by the SEC from institutional investment managers detailing their equity holdings.
Stake: The ownership interest or share held in a company by an investor or fund.
Liquidated: Sold off an asset or investment for cash, often completely closing a position.
Dividend Yield: A financial ratio showing how much a company pays in dividends each year relative to its stock price.
Distribution Channels: The various ways a company delivers its products to customers, such as through wholesalers or retailers.
Acoustical Solutions: Products designed to control sound within buildings, often used in ceilings and walls.
Contractors: Professionals or companies hired to perform construction or renovation work.
TTM: The 12-month period ending with the most recent quarterly report.

By

PYMNTS
 | 
November 16, 2025

 | 

Apple is reportedly preparing to name a new leader to replace longtime CEO Tim Cook.

Cook, who has led Apple for more than 14 years, could step down as soon as next year, the Financial Times (FT) reported Friday (Nov. 14), citing sources familiar with the matter.

These sources told FT Apple’s board and senior executives have stepped up preparations for Cook to turn things over to a new chief executive. John Ternus, Apple’s senior vice president of hardware engineering, is widely viewed as Cook’s most likely replacement, although no decisions have been made, these sources said.

PYMNTS has contacted Apple for comment but has not yet gotten a reply.

Sources close to the company say this is a long-planned transition, and unrelated to Apple’s current performance, with Apple expected to enjoy massive sales of the iPhone as the year winds down. The report added that the company is unlikely to name a new CEO before it reports earnings in late January.

Announcing a new CEO early in 2026 would give a new leadership team time to find its footing ahead of major company events like Apple’s developer conference in June and its iPhone launch in September, the sources said.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

Cook, Apple’s former operations chief, became CEO in 2011, just before the death of co-founder Steve Jobs. Under Cook’s leadership, FT noted, Apple’s market capitalization has ballooned from $350 billion in 2011 to the $4 trillion milestone it reached last month.

The report said that while Apple’s shares are trading near record highs, the company still lags rivals like Google, Microsoft and Nvidia, whose valuations have soared thanks to Wall Street’s enthusiasm about artificial intelligence (AI).

PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster wrote about this situation last year, framing it as part of a larger series of headaches facing Apple.

“Maybe investors didn’t take Gen AI, and more recently, agent-driven workflows, as seriously before. Was Gen AI really all that transformative? Would people and businesses really care? The market response is yes, yes and without a doubt, yes,” Webster wrote.

“They and Apple are finding that AI is a technological opportunity that rewards speed. Apple hasn’t left the starting blocks. Its competitors are accelerating, iterating and launching new Gen AI tools and agents across products and platforms. Apple is betting it can catch up by wiring OpenAI into Siri. A year from now.”

The AI boom shows no signs of slowing down.

Growth stocks are still in style on Wall Street, and as long as the artificial intelligence (AI) trend is ongoing, I doubt there's much that will change that fact. The fastest-growing stocks are all involved in the AI boom, and there are multiple businesses that look like excellent buys.

My top two are Nvidia (NVDA +1.68%) and Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM +0.93%). Both of these companies are seeing huge growth thanks to the AI arms race, and their impressive performance doesn't seem to be slowing down anytime soon. I think these two are must-buys for every growth investor, especially heading into 2026 -- a year slated to see significant AI growth again.

Image source: Getty Images.

Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor are integral to the AI arms race
Nvidia has been the go-to computing unit provider since the AI trend began. Its graphics processing units (GPUs) and the ancillary products that support them give Nvidia the best ecosystem in the industry, which is why it has dramatically outperformed AMD so far in the AI boom.

Additionally, it's holding its own against Broadcom, which is partnering directly with AI hyperscalers to develop its own custom AI chip that can outperform GPUs at a cheaper price point, but at the cost of flexibility. Nvidia clients love the flexibility that its products offer, and there's a good reason why its products are still the top-selling computing units in the AI megatrend.

Today's Change

(

1.68

%) $

3.14

Current Price

$

190.00

Nvidia is known as a fabless chip company. It designs the product, then outsources the manufacturing work to others. One of those is Taiwan Semiconductor. Taiwan Semiconductor is the world's largest chip foundry business and boasts nearly every major AI company as a client. Without TSMC's production capabilities, none of the incredible generative AI technology we experience today would be possible.

Taiwan Semiconductor is also working to solve AI's biggest problem to date: energy consumption. AI hypercalers are spending hundreds of billions on data center capital expenditures, but they're about to run into the bottleneck of power capacity.

Taiwan Semiconductor is offering a solution to this problem by launching a new chip generation that consumes 25% to 30% less power when configured to run at the same speed as prior generations. That's a big deal, and it will allow companies like Nvidia to continue selling an immense number of high-powered computing chips because the grid can handle more of them.

Today's Change

(

0.93

%) $

2.62

Current Price

$

284.82

With both companies benefiting massively from the AI buildout, the obvious question arises: When will it end? According to Nvidia, not for some time. Nvidia projects that global data center capital expenditures will rise to $600 billion this year, then increase to $3 trillion to $4 trillion by 2030. That's a massive runway over the next few years, and each company will be primed to benefit from this general opportunity if that project pans out. Even if it's a bit of an overestimation, the general direction is probably right, making Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor excellent buys now.

Neither stock is as expensive as it appears
Both Taiwan Semiconductor and Nvidia often get tagged with the stigma of being expensive. However, that's not true. What investors fail to consider is the growth rate combined with the valuation. There's a metric for this, known as the PEG ratio. This factors in both growth and valuation, and any company with a PEG ratio under 1 is seen as undervalued.

TSM PEG Ratio data by YCharts

Both Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor are undervalued by this metric, making them seem like fairly attractive investments, especially if the AI boom keeps growing at the pace that it has in the past. With AI hyperscalers slated to spend even more on data centers in 2026 than in 2025, this trend seems likely.

As a result, both Nvidia and Taiwan Semiconductor look like excellent investments right now, and investors can be confident holding them throughout 2026 and beyond.

Keithen Drury has positions in Broadcom, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Antonio Bordunovi/iStock Editorial via Getty Images

Listen below or on the go via Apple Podcasts and Spotify

Will the market’s most important company shine or disappoint? (0:17) Disney back on YouTube. (2:10) Apple prepares iPhone overhaul. (2:40)

The following is an abridged transcript:

It’s the big one.

Nvidia (NVDA) reports earnings on Wednesday and as the current saying goes: “As Nvidia goes so goes the market.”

In a case of one stock becoming its own benchmark, the S&P 500 (SP500) (SPY) (IVV) (VOO) is now more closely correlated to AI heavyweight Nvidia than to its own equal-weight index (RSP), according to Goldman Sachs.

The Street consensus is for EPS of $1.25 on revenue of $54.87 billion.

Here’s a breakdown of how the stock is viewed:

Our Quant Rating has the stock at Hold, solely because of the Valuation at more than 50x non-GAAP earnings.

Wall Street has more than 50 Strong Buy or Buy ratings, and just one Strong Sell: Jay Goldberg of Seaport Research.

He told MarketWatch: "I have never told my clients to 'short' Nvidia. But I've always positioned my thesis as, 'Nvidia is going to underperform the sector.' And that has actually played out. If you look at the AI sector, Nvidia has underperformed since April 1 when I launched coverage."

But Susquehanna lifted its price target on Nvidia to $230 from $210, keeping a positive rating ahead of FQ3 earnings. They expect strong results as the GB300 ramp accelerates and hyperscalers boost capex by 69% in 2025 and 24% in 2026. Supply checks were upbeat, with Foxconn already hitting its 2025 AI server revenue goal.

As for Seeking Alpha analysts, who are also in the Buy camp, KM Capital says Nvidia is substantially undervalued and its strong fundamentals and history of earnings beats reinforce confidence in robust upcoming results.

In the bear camp, Mott Capital Management warns that NVDA options positioning is extremely bullish, making options expensive and setting up a scenario where implied volatility collapse could hurt call holders.

Also on the earnings calendar

XPeng (XPEV), Brady (BRC), Magic (MGIC) and LifeMD (LFMD) report Monday.

On Tuesday, Home Depot (HD), Medtronic (MDT), Baidu (BIDU) and Futu (FUTU) issue numbers.

Along with Nvidia (NVDA), Palo Alto Networks (PANW), Lowe’s LOW and Target (TGT) weigh in on Wednesday.

Walmart (WMT), Intuit (INTU) and Jacobs Engineering (J) report Thursday.

In the news this weekend, YouTube TV and Disney have reached a deal that will restore ESPN, ABC and other channels to the platform’s 10 million subscribers after nearly a two-week hiatus, the companies announced Friday night.

The deal will give Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL)YouTube TV subscribers access to ESPN’s new direct-to-consumer “Unlimited” service at no additional cost, as part of YouTube TV’s base plan. That is most notable for WWE fans, as WWE’s major events — including Wrestlemania — are now part of ESPN’s Unlimited offering. The Unlimited service will also be accessible directly on the YouTube TV platform.

YouTube TV subscribers pay a little more than $80 per month for the base plan. The rollout will be completed by the end of 2026.

And Apple (AAPL) is undertaking its most sweeping iPhone revamp to date, with three completely new models set to arrive over three consecutive years.

Bloomberg says the shift comes as Apple faces criticism for leaning heavily on the iPhone while rivals advance in artificial intelligence and emerging hardware categories.

Gurman on Sunday reported that Apple began rethinking the device last September, starting with the introduction of the iPhone Air and redesigned iPhone 17 Pro models. A foldable iPhone is expected next fall, followed in 2027 by a premium device featuring curved glass and an under-display camera.

And for income investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) goes ex-dividend on Monday. The oil giant pays out on December 1.

Applied Materials (AMAT) and Microsoft (MSFT) go ex-dividend on Thursday. They both pay out on December 11.

The iBuyer's warrant gambit could prove frightful to shareholders instead.

Opendoor Technologies (OPEN 5.14%) may have delivered underwhelming results when it reported earnings last week, but shares in the real estate iBuyer have surged in price nevertheless. At first, it may be easy to attribute this latest price action to "meme stock mania."

Over the past few months, Opendoor has become one of the most popular meme stocks. Yet while the stock is indeed experiencing another wave of "meme mania," there may be much substance to what's driving it.

Right after earnings, Opendoor made an announcement that investors perceived to be a possible trigger for a short squeeze. While it's possible that a further run-up occurs, these corporate actions could end up nightmarish, not for the short side of the trade, but for shareholders.

Image source: Getty Images.

Opendoor and its delayed post-earnings surge
On Nov. 6, Opendoor released earnings for the quarter ending Sept. 30, 2025. The company beat on revenue, but actual numbers for adjusted EBITDA and losses per share came in worse than sell-side analyst forecasts.

MetricQ3 2025 EstimatesQ3 2025 ActualsDifferenceRevenue$850 million$915 million$75 millionAdjusted EBITDA($24.4 million)($33 million)($8.6 million)Losses per share($0.07)($0.08)($0.01)
Opendoor's turnaround remains a work in progress. The company is using AI to enhance its business, improving the unit economics and in turn bringing Opendoor to the point of steady profitability. Still, there's a second ingredient likely necessary for this turning to take shape: a rebound in the housing market. Interest rates have come down, but housing demand is once again slowing down as well.

It's unclear whether Opendoor will live up to goal of hitting break-even profitability next year. Still, while the stock initially dropped on earnings day, it wasn't long before shares resumed their higher surge. For this delayed post-earnings surge, perhaps the credit should go to Kaz Nejatian, the current CEO of Opendoor, and former COO of Shopify.

Today's Change

(

-5.14

%) $

-0.44

Current Price

$

8.12

On the post-earnings conference call, Nejatian discussed a plan that he believed could "ruin the night" of short sellers. Meme mania notwithstanding, short interest remains high, at nearly 22%.

Why a short seller's "nightmare" paves the way for more gains
So, what was this "plan," and why did it elicit such a position reaction from investors? The big announcement was as follows: to shareholders of record as of Nov. 6, 2025 at 5 p.m., Opendoor plans to distribute three separate stock warrants, for each 30 shares held.

These warrants enable existing Opendoor investors the ability to acquire additional shares, at strike prices of $9, $13, and $17 per share. Why did Nejatian say these warrants could prove nightmarish for the shorts?

Since short sellers have to borrow the shares they have sold short, they are also on the hook for any dividends or distributions from these borrowed shares. Buying up these warrants could be costly, especially as investors continue to bid up the underlying Opendoor shares.

Some of these short sellers could also decide to fully exit their positions. This would also likely put a further squeeze on the stock.

Still, tread carefully
Based on the headlines, it may seem as if Opendoor's management has crafted a seamless way to drive up the stock price. However, it may not be that easy. Opendoor is also quietly redeeming outstanding convertible bonds via an exchange offer. By increasing the share count, this little-discussed action is going to cause share dilution. Further dilution may occur, if shares climb above the various strike price of the warrants and investors exercise them.

Yes, it may be a positive for Opendoor to reduce debt and increase its cash position, but what happens if all this cash just goes to covering further operating losses? If fiscal performance fails to improve, but its outstanding share count keeps rising, this could place considerable pressure on the stock. This is very similar to what happened with former "meme king" AMC Entertainment.

With this news, instead of chasing the latest Opendoor Technologies rally, you may want to tread carefully, or even skip it entirely.

November 16, 2025 6:15 PM EST | Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - November 16, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Avantor, Inc. (NYSE: AVTR) between March 5, 2024 and October 28, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important December 29, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline.

SO WHAT: If you purchased Avantor common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Avantor class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=47303 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than December 29, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved, at that time, the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants misrepresented and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Avantor's competitive positioning was weaker than defendants had publicly represented; (2) Avantor was experiencing negative effects from increased competition; and (3) as a result, defendants' representations about Avantor's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

To join the Avantor class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=47303 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

-------------------------------

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/274698

Australia's Syrah Resources said on Monday that it had agreed with Tesla to extend the deadline to tackle an alleged default of their graphite supply agreement for the second time in two months as the miner works to keep its U.S. operations buoyant.

Cardano (ADA) is facing renewed pressure in the market as its price continues to hover around a key support level. While the broader crypto market has seen increased volatility, analysts believe ADA may be gearing up for a potential trend reversal—one that could eventually push the price toward the highly anticipated $2.00 mark.

BTC triggers a Death Cross as price falls below $94,000 for the first time since May 5.History shows mixed short-term outcomes but strong 2–3 month rebounds. A bounce within 7 days could confirm the bull cycle holds.The Bitcoin (BTC) price action triggered a Death Cross on Sunday, November 16, after its 50-day moving average dipped below the 200-day moving average.

Historically considered a bearish technical signal, the event has sparked fresh debate among traders and analysts. The key question: does this mark a local bottom, or is a further drop looming?

Sponsored

What Is a Death Cross and Why It Matters Now for Bitcoin PriceIn technical analysis, a Death Cross occurs when short-term price momentum falls below long-term trends, signaling potential downward pressure. As of this writing, Bitcoin trades around $93,646, after slipping below the $94,000 threshold for the first time since May 5.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price Performance. Source: TradingViewMarket sentiment is extremely bearish, with the Fear & Greed Index plunging to 10, indicating extreme fear. Meanwhile, whale selling and spot ETF outflows have accelerated recent downward moves.

Amidst these negative sentiments and fear of further downside, analysts say that a Death Cross does not automatically predict crashes.

Historical data from 2014 to 2025 shows mixed short-term outcomes but strong medium- to long-term rebounds in many cycles.

Sponsored

Historical Performance: Short-Term Losses, Medium-Term GainsData shared by Mario Nawfal and on-chain analysts indicates:

1–3 weeks post-cross: Returns are nearly 50/50 between gains and losses; median returns slightly positive (~0.25–2.35%).
2–3 months post-cross: Average gains jump to 15–26%, suggesting a potential recovery if historical patterns hold.
12 months later: Outcomes vary widely; some cycles delivered 85%+ gains, others experienced severe drawdowns, depending on the macro context.
Bitcoin Price After Death Cross. Source: Mario Nawfal on X (Twitter)Benjamin Cowen and Rekt Fencer argue that previous Death Crosses have often marked local lows, rather than market tops. The timing of the next bounce could be critical. If BTC does not rally within 7 days, analysts warn another leg down could precede a larger recovery.

Bitcoin had a death cross today.

Note that prior death crosses marked local lows in the market.

Of course, when the cycle is over, the death cross rally fails.

The time for Bitcoin to bounce if the cycle is not over would be starting within the next week.

If no bounce occurs… pic.twitter.com/Rg8pSxYMva

— Benjamin Cowen (@intocryptoverse) November 16, 2025
Sponsored

What’s Next for Bitcoin Investors? Key Levels and Market SignalsTechnical and macro indicators highlight crucial thresholds:

Support range: $60,000–$70,000, a potential floor if selling pressure intensifies.
Bullish confirmation: Reclaiming the 200-day moving average as support could signal renewed upward momentum.
Analyst Brett notes that the 50-week MA remains a more decisive long-term indicator than the Death Cross alone.

Bitcoin's Death Cross vs. 50w MA

The death cross is confirmed, and unless Bitcoin pumps to $103,000 within 12 hours, the close below the 50w MA will also be confirmed.

The good (bull case): The death cross is typically a local bottom indicator.

The bad (bear case): We're… https://t.co/PCWIH5NgBu pic.twitter.com/uMBVNpzUl4

— ₿rett (@brett_eth) November 16, 2025
Sponsored

Historical cycles indicate that Death Crosses during bull markets often precede rallies toward new all-time highs. Conversely, those during bear markets are typically short-lived.

Nonetheless, investors should monitor short-term price action closely because historical data implies:

A bounce within a week could signal the bull cycle remains intact.
Failure to bounce may trigger another decline, creating a macro lower high before a larger rally.
Meanwhile, medium-term projections indicate a 15–27% recovery gain over the next 2–3 months if BTC follows median historical behavior.

The long-term upside remains plausible, but variability is high, highlighting the importance of combining technical, on-chain, and macro analysis for informed strategic decisions.

While the Death Cross signals caution, history shows that Bitcoin often rebounds after similar events. Traders should remain alert, watch key support levels, and be prepared for short-term volatility, even as potential medium- and long-term gains remain within reach.

Disclaimer

In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.

Should you buy PayPal's stablecoin or Ripple's recent offering? One earns 4% interest, while the other is built for invisible infrastructure.

PayPal USD (PYUSD +0.02%) and Ripple USD (RLUSD +0.02%) aren't the largest stablecoins on the market. As of this writing on Nov. 13, their respective market caps of $3.4 billion and $1.0 billion look like rounding errors next to USDC's (USDC +0.00%) $75.5 billion and Tether's (USDT +0.01%) $184.0 billion.

But they are refreshingly different from the usual big-name stablecoins. Each one comes with a few unique features -- and limitations. So, if you're looking for a lesser-known stablecoin to buy, which one is the better choice right now?

Today's Change

(

0.02

%) $

0.00

Current Price

$

1.00

Where can you actually buy these stablecoins?
First of all, one of these coins may be easier to buy than the other. It depends on which crypto-trading service you're using.

The big dogs like Tether and USDC are available on pretty much any popular platform, alongside popular non-stablecoins such as Bitcoin and Dogecoin. PayPal USD and Ripple USD are not universally available everywhere.

For example, my Coinbase (COIN +0.21%) account provides information only on Ripple USD, with no buy buttons in sight. "Ripple USD is not tradable on Coinbase," the service says. Coinbase does support trading PayPal USD but won't pay any interest-like rewards on those holdings.

Searching for PYUSD or RLUSD on Robinhood (HOOD +0.66%) won't even give me a search result with basic information. Kraken gives me access to both but, again, without those sweet reward payouts. Same story at Uphold: I can buy them but not earn interest. Yeah, call me a nerd -- I have a couple of different crypto-trading accounts.

Today's Change

(

0.02

%) $

0.00

Current Price

$

1.00

PayPal's home turf advantage
If you want a full-featured PayPal USD holding, you should, of course, buy it in your PayPal (PYPL 3.92%) account. It could take a minute to find "crypto" in the PayPal dashboard's menu system, but when you finally click on it, your screen fills up with news about PYUSD's trading options. And the coin will earn 4% a year in this account. The service offers only seven cryptocurrencies, but PayPal USD is absolutely an option.

Ripple's stablecoin is available in more than two dozen crypto exchanges, but it's really intended for smoother trading of Ripple's XRP (XRP 2.03%) token. The group is working on a yield-generating staking system, but it's not ready for prime time yet. Wherever you go, XRP's stablecoin cousin won't earn you any interest payouts.

Investment versus infrastructure
RLUSD is backed by cash reserves and can be exchanged for an equal amount of U.S. dollars anytime. Its tokens move across the Ethereum and XRP blockchain networks. It's the perfect tool for sending cash across international borders, and not much else. This coin provides liquidity and rapid execution of RippleNet transactions in tandem with the XRP coin.

There's really no reason to buy and hold it as an investment, at least not until those impending yield features are completed.

PYUSD is slightly different. Its cash backing and dollar-redemption features are the same, but that's about it. This was originally an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum network and has added several more trading networks over time. You'll earn 4% interest while holding PYUSD coins in your PayPal wallet. Transfer fees are zero if you send PYUSD coins on PayPal's own Venmo or the PayPal cash-transfer service. And if you insist on venturing outside PayPal's borders, there are no fees for PYUSD transfers on the Solana blockchain.

Image source: Getty Images.

I'd honestly prefer to make money on my stablecoin holdings
So, yeah, there are some solid reasons to hold PYUSD coins instead of dollars in your PayPal account. Four percent is a pretty robust annual yield, and the fee-free transfers could come in handy.

Therefore, I see a clear winner here, even if both coins are pegged to the $1.00 price point forevermore. It can make financial sense to own PayPal USD for its own sake, while the RLUSD coin is best used behind the scenes of RippleNet and XRP transactions. If you don't even notice using it, RLUSD is doing its job.

Anders Bylund has positions in Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, PayPal, Solana, and XRP. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global and recommends the following options: long January 2027 $42.50 calls on PayPal and short December 2025 $75 calls on PayPal. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

The crypto market never relaxes. It pumps like it discovered caffeine, dumps like it lost the will to live, and then repeats the cycle like nothing happened. Everyone claims to know the future based on charts, indicators, and Twitter vibes. But the real truth is simple: when markets turn scary, most people freeze. They sit. They hesitate. They wait for certainty that never comes. Meanwhile, the ones who win move first.

This is where new crypto coins enter the scene. They bring high energy, fresh ideas, and often the biggest early rewards. While crypto giants play predictable games, the newest tokens prepare the wildest runs. And right now, three names are buzzing loudly: Apeing, Stellar, and Bitcoin Cash. Different coins, different strengths, but one shared theme: timing is everything.

Crypto is building momentum again, user adoption is rising, and new token launches are gaining traction. For investors, developers, analysts, and even degen meme-coin lovers, the question becomes obvious: are these the early positions that create the next wave of crypto millionaires… or even billionaires? Let’s break down the stars of this early-access movement.

Apeing: The New Crypto Coin Built for People Who Act, Not Freeze
Apeing represents the spirit that built crypto wealth. It rewards those who take action instead of waiting. Its whitelist access gives early supporters front-row positioning at the lowest entry prices, the same strategy that made early meme-coin holders legends in past cycles.

There’s no complicated technical barrier and no over-engineered processes. You visit the official site, add your email, and get confirmation. That’s it. Early access means early pricing, and early pricing creates better upside potential when liquidity kicks in.

Apeing is also built around community energy, smart token design, and movement-driven hype. It embraces the degen mentality, but the structure behind it focuses on sustainability: enough rewards to keep people excited, enough stability to avoid chaos.

This is what makes Apeing stand out among new crypto coins. It offers a chance to be early while others are still debating whether they should join. In crypto history, hesitation has always been more expensive than action.

Stellar: New Crypto Coin Growth Through Real Utility
Stellar is not brand-new, but it is newly rising again. It is one of the strongest examples of new crypto coins gaining attention due to real-world impact. Instead of memes, it focuses on adoption: fast payment rails, developer growth, and increasing on-chain activity.

As digital finance grows, scalable and cost-efficient settlement platforms gain priority. Stellar’s role in powering global transactions and new smart-contract abilities makes it relevant for both crypto insiders and traditional finance.

Prices haven’t even awakened compared to its past peak, which is exactly what patient investors love. When real infrastructure meets market hype, upside often follows. Stellar represents the new age of blockchain utility: fast, secure, and ready to scale with consumer adoption.

Bitcoin Cash: Old Blood Thriving in a New Crypto Coin Era
Bitcoin Cash has a legacy, but it now behaves like one of the new crypto coins worth watching. It’s evolving with renewed attention, increased liquidity, and rising transaction relevance.

Its biggest strength is simplicity: a fast, peer-to-peer digital cash system with low fees. It follows Bitcoin’s core spirit, but pushes usability.

Market watchers see more institutional talk, more retail comeback, and more attempts to re-claim narrative space. It may not have the wild meme hype of newer launches, but Bitcoin Cash offers something rare in crypto, a path that mixes stability with upside.

In a growing market where traders want confidence AND opportunity, BCH becomes the clever bridge.

Conclusion: Early Action Builds the Biggest Crypto Stories
If a billionaire wave forms in crypto again, the earliest entries will shape the success stories. New crypto coins thrive when people believe in the future before it becomes obvious. Apeing delivers the early-access advantage. Stellar brings growth-driven fundamentals. Bitcoin Cash delivers historical strength and renewed energy.

This trio is building momentum and attracting those who refuse to be late twice. Crypto is shifting. Opportunity is forming. The next wave is getting ready. The real question is whether you plan to watch others catch it, or secure your position before the rest of the crowd wakes up.

For More Information:
Website: Visit the Official Apeing Website

Telegram: Join the Apeing Telegram Channel

Twitter: Follow Apeing ON X (Formerly Twitter)

FAQ About New Crypto Coins
Which coin will give 1000x?
There is no guaranteed 1000x crypto, but analysts track high-growth new crypto coins with strong communities, early access entry points, and clear demand drivers. Coins like Apeing are gaining attention because early supporters can secure lower pricing before liquidity expands. High-reward assets also carry high risk, so research is essential before investing.

Which is the next big crypto coin?
Many traders currently watch emerging projects built around strong narratives, user adoption, and community power. Apeing is one of the next big crypto coins that stands out due to trending whitelist momentum and early-stage accessibility. Coins with rising social engagement often outperform in bullish cycles.

What crypto is under $1?
Several cryptocurrencies trade under $1, including many new crypto coins that early investors monitor for higher growth potential. Low price alone doesn’t guarantee value, but affordable entry ranges allow new traders to build bigger positions without heavy capital.

How to find new crypto coins?
New crypto opportunities can be found by tracking whitelist announcements, community listings, developer networks, and social analytics. Traders often focus on coins gaining traction fast, like Apeing, because strong early demand can drive rapid price discovery once trading goes live.

Summary
New crypto coins are attracting strong interest as traders seek assets with high-upside potential. Apeing leads the excitement by offering whitelist access that rewards people who move early. Stellar continues to expand real-world utility through fast payments and increasing network activity. Bitcoin Cash revives as a hybrid of stability and renewed growth. Together, these projects show how timing, fundamentals, and community energy can align to create major opportunities. Early participation often determines the biggest gains, and these coins represent three different ways to position for the rising crypto demand. While risks remain, momentum is forming, and the biggest winners are always the ones who move first.

Disclaimer: The statements, views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily represent those of Crypto Reporter. Crypto Reporter is not responsible for the trustworthiness, quality, accuracy of any materials in this article. This article is provided for educational purposes only. Crypto Reporter is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article. Do your research and invest at your own risk.

Fasten your seatbelts — 2026 is shaping up to be a turning point for digital payments. Cash App's decision to integrate USDC transactions on the Solana blockchain marks a major step forward in the evolution of stablecoin-powered finance.