Market Signal Briefing

  March 19, 2026 – TheNewswire - Vancouver, B.C., Canada – Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) (CSE:GCC) (OTC:GCCFF) (WKN:A402CQ) (FSE:3TZ) announces the Company’s intent to amend 1,666,668 warrants issued pursuant to a private placement.  The warrants will be repriced from $0.30 to $0.11 and extended from March 29, 2026 to March 29, 2027.

  The Company is in the process of obtaining warrant holder consent.  Repricing of the warrants requires the approval of all warrant holders.  Subject to obtaining such approval, the warrant expiry date would be modified to the earlier of:

March 29, 2027: or 

If, following the amendment, for any 10 consecutive trading days the closing price of the listed shares exceeds the amended exercise price by the applicable private placement discount, which is C$0.1467, the term of the warrants must also be amended to 30 days. The amended term must be announced by press release and amendment to warrant terms and the 30-day period will commence 7 days from the end of the 10-day period. 

  About Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd.

  Golden Cariboo Resources Ltd. is rediscovering the Cariboo Gold Rush by proceeding with highly targeted drilling and trenching programs on its Quesnelle Gold Quartz Mine property which is bordered by Osisko Development (NSE:ODV/TSXV:ODV), partly intertwined with them at the north end of the Cariboo Gold Project, and located along a favourable corridor adjacent to the Spanish and Eureka thrust faults over a 94,899 hectare (234,501 acre) area. Historically, over 101 placer gold creeks on the 90-kilometer (56 mile) trend, from the Cariboo Hudson mine north to the Quesnelle Gold Quartz Mine property, have recorded production with successful placer mining continuing to this day.

  Golden Cariboo’s Quesnelle Gold Quartz Mine property is 4 kilometers (2.5 miles) northeast of, and road accessible from, Hixon in central British Columbia. The Property includes the Quesnelle Quartz gold-silver deposit, which was discovered in 1865 and developed over a footprint of about 150m x 150m (< 6 acres) at the Main zone straddling Hixon Creek. Overall, the geological setting of the gold mineralization at the Company’s Quesnelle Gold Quartz Mine property shows strong similarities with the Spanish Mountain gold deposit, situated 120 km (75 miles) towards the southeast along the same geological trend. As a sediment-hosted vein (SHV) deposit, the Spanish Mountain deposit is considered to belong to the epizonal orogenic subclass of gold deposits which include some of the world’s largest deposits such as Muruntau, Uzbekistan and Bendigo, Australia.

  For further information please contact:

  GOLDEN CARIBOO RESOURCES LTD      

“J. Frank Callaghan”       

  J. Frank Callaghan, President & CEO

Tel:  604-669-6463

   

  VISIT OUR WEBSITE FOR MORE DETAILS

www.goldencariboo.com

LIKE AND FOLLOW

Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn

Neither the “CSE” Canadian Securities Exchange nor its Regulation Service Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the Canadian Securities Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

  Cautionary Statements:

  This news release contains statements which constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements regarding the plans, intentions, beliefs and current expectations of the Company with respect to future business activities and plans of the Company. Forward-looking information is often identified by the words “may”, “would”, “could”, “should”, “will”, “intend”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect” or similar expressions and includes information regarding; the expectation that the Company will receive all necessary exemptions and approvals to complete the Offering; the expectation that the Company will complete the Offering on the terms disclosed, or at all; the expectation that the proceeds will be used for property exploration and for general working capital; the Company’s exploration plans with respect to its Quesnelle Gold Quartz Mine property; and the anticipated participation of the insider in the Offering.

  Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions of management, including, without limitation, that the Company will receive all necessary exemptions and approvals to complete the Offering; that the Company will complete the Offering on the terms disclosed, or at all; that the proceeds will be used for property exploration and for general working capital; that the Company will have the resources required to proceed with its exploration plans; that the Company will not run into regulatory or other barriers in carrying out its business plans; that the insider will participate in the Offering, on the terms and conditions and in the amount currently expected by management; and that the Company will be able to rely on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements on the basis anticipated.

  Additionally, forward-looking information involve a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual plans, intentions, activities, results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future plans, intentions, activities, results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, without limitation: that the Company will not receive the necessary exemptions and approvals to complete the Offering; that the Company will not complete the Offering on the terms disclosed, or at all; that the Company will be unable to use the proceeds for property exploration and for general working capital; that the Company may incur unanticipated costs; that the Company may not have the resources required to pursue its exploration plans; that the Company’s operations could be adversely affected by possible future government legislation policies and controls or by changes in applicable laws and regulations; that the insider may not participate in the Offering on the terms and conditions and in the amount currently expected by management, or at all; and that the Company may not be able to rely on the exemption from the formal valuation and minority shareholder approval requirements on the basis currently expected. Such forward-looking information represents management’s best judgment based on information currently available. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. Neither the Company nor any of its representatives make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, sufficiency or completeness of the information in this news release. Neither the Company nor any of its representatives shall have any liability whatsoever, under contract, tort, trust or otherwise, to you or any person resulting from the use of the information in this news release by you or any of your representatives or for omissions from the information in this news release.

  The forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date they were originally made. The Company has no intention and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

 

Gold edged lower in early trade on inflation concerns and dimmed Fed rate-cut hopes.

Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - March 19, 2026) - NU E Power Corp. (CSE: NUE) (OTC Pink: NUEPF) ("NU E" or the "Company") is issuing the following press release as clarifications to the November 3, 2025 press release.

Hybrid Power Site Development Opportunities

On November 3, 2025, the Company announced that it had acquired hybrid power development assets from the portfolio of ACT Mid Market Ltd. ("ACT") including specific hybrid sites in Brazil, Mongolia, Canada, Malaysia, and Nigeria. The Company is issuing this press release to clarify such statements.

The Company and ACT do not hold direct ownership of the assets referenced in the November 3, 2025 press release; however, exclusive options and development rights are in place for the properties in Mongolia and Saskatchewan. Additionally, the Company would like to state that no physical assets were included in the ACT project portfolio. The Company issues the below clarifications regarding specific project information in connection to the ACT portfolio:

a) Darkhan, Mongolia - 100 MW Hybrid Gas-Solar-Battery Site:

The project remains at an early development stage, and that no binding agreements relating to construction, power sales, land acquisition, or financing are in place. In addition, the project remains subject to further technical, regulatory, commercial, and financing review.

A $25,000 payment was made which grants the Company a twelve-month exclusive right to utilize the property.

If the project proceeds, the Company would only have a 60% ownership interest in the SPV.

The Company and Tsegtskharaa LLC intend to enter into a Joint Development Agreement to develop the Darkhan Energy Park, a hybrid energy complex in Darkhan, Mongolia. The proposed ownership is 60% for the Company and 40% for Tsegtskharaa LLC upon completion of environmental and feasibility studies and securing of required permits. The composition and scope of energy generation assets remain subject to feasibility assessments.

b) Saskatchewan, Canada - 100 MW Community Power + Data Center Hub:

The Company has rights to the property for twelve-months that commenced August 25, 2025.

The project is being jointly developed with XBASE, and that XBASE retains ownership of the land.

The initiative remains at an early development stage and is subject to additional diligence, permitting, regulatory approvals, commercial structuring, and financing.

While preliminary feasibility and environmental assessments in connection with a potential energy development initiative have been completed, no binding agreements or final investment decisions have been made.

c) Johor, Malaysia - ~100 MW + Data Centre & Power Project:

This is an early-stage, non-binding development.

Land and power availability for the ~100 MW project is in initial due diligence.

To date, project initiatives are nearing exploratory in nature and may involve options, letters of intent, rights to work, or similar preliminary arrangements.

An SPV has not been formed, no bid has been submitted, and there are no LOIs in place with potential offtake partners.

d) Malaysian University - 25-50 MW Campus Data Centres:

The Company has only provided the IIUM a letter of intent for its interest in collaboration, and that no binding agreements are in place.

The Company continues discussions with the initial academic institution and is also in discussions with Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) regarding potential collaboration.

e) Minas Gerais, Brazil - 100 MW Solar Development (25 MW Operating + 75 MW Expansion):

The project remains subject to further technical review, regulatory approvals, commercial structuring, financing, and the execution of definitive agreements.

No formal site visit has been completed.

No construction or investment decisions have been made.

The project is currently at the MOU stage for "continued dialogue and due diligence", and that the MOU is non-binding in nature.

f) Lagos, Nigeria - Hybrid Gas + Solar Development (Early Stage):

Preliminary, non-binding discussions relating to potential opportunities have been conducted.

The project remains early in nature, with ongoing assessment coordinated by the Company's project team.

The project size and scope are unknown and no formal site visit has occurred.

SPV structuring and feasibility has not yet been performed.

Past Board Changes

The Company would like to clarify that Broderick Gunning, the Company's current President and Chief Executive Officer, was not serving in that capacity (and was not a member of the Board) at the time of the November 25, 2025 press release.

About NU E Power Corp.

NU E is a multi-stage power developer that converts land and grid access into institutional-grade energy assets. NU E develops next-generation power sites for the digital and global power economies. Combining renewables, grid, gas, nuclear and battery storage, NU E delivers scalable, reliable, and optimized energy sites across the world.

The Canadian Securities Exchange (operated by CNSX Markets Inc.) has neither approved nor disapproved of the contents of this press release.

Forward-Looking Information

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements. Certain information set forth in this press release may contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Words such as "may", "will", "would", "expect", "intend", "plan", "believe", or the negative or other variations of these words, or similar words or phrases, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, but are not limited to: the Company's intention to enter into Joint Development Agreements for the Darkhan Energy Park (Mongolia) and the Saskatchewan project (being jointly developed with XBASE); the proposed ownership structures for such projects; the possible development of the Company's early-stage project portfolio in Brazil, Mongolia, Canada, Malaysia, and Nigeria; and the Company's continued pursuit of power development and data center opportunities. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance.

There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking information is not based on historical facts but instead reflects the Company's management's expectations, estimates or projections concerning the business of the Company's future results or events based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made. The forward-looking statements are based on a number of material assumptions, including: the successful negotiation and execution of Joint Development Agreements with Tsegtskharaa LLC and XBASE on acceptable terms; the successful completion of environmental and feasibility studies for each project; the Company's ability to obtain required permits, regulatory approvals, and zoning approvals; the availability of financing on acceptable terms; the successful completion of due diligence for each project; counterparties entering into binding agreements; and the absence of any material adverse change affecting the Company's operations or the projects.

The Company is subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in the statements, including risks related to factors beyond the control of the Company. Such factors include, among other things: projects may not advance beyond their current MOU, letter of intent, or preliminary stage; Joint Development Agreements may not be executed or may be executed on terms materially different than anticipated; required permits, regulatory approvals, or zoning approvals may not be obtained or may be delayed; financing may not be available on acceptable terms or at all; exclusivity periods or development rights may expire before projects can be advanced; environmental or feasibility studies may identify issues that prevent projects from proceeding; counterparties may not execute binding agreements; disputes may arise regarding the interpretation or performance of any agreements; the Company may not realize the anticipated benefits of its projects or corporate restructuring; and other risks that are customary to early-stage development projects. Additional risk factors are described in the Company's continuous disclosure documents available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. No assurance can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if they do occur, what benefits the Company will obtain from them. Except as required under applicable securities legislation, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking information.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/289266

Source: Nu E Corp.

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

NEW YORK, March 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kirby McInerney LLP reminds investors who purchased Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (“Eos” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:EOSE) securities to contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests in the securities fraud class action lawsuit at no cost.

If you suffered a loss on your Eos investments, you have until May 5, 2026 to request lead plaintiff appointment. Courts do not consider lead plaintiff applications submitted after this deadline. The lead plaintiff oversees the litigation on behalf of the class and may influence key decisions, including litigation strategy and settlement. Courts regularly appoint individual investors as lead plaintiffs, not only institutions.

Follow the link below for more information about the lawsuit:

[CONTACT THE FIRM IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS]

What Is The Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit has been filed on behalf of investors who purchased securities during the period of November 5, 2025 through February 26, 2026, inclusive (“the Class Period”). The lawsuit alleges that (1) the Company was unable to achieve the ramp in production and capacity utilization required to achieve its previously set guidance; (2) the Company’s battery line downtime was running well above industry norms, the design intent of the line, and internal forecasts; (3) the Company was experiencing delays in the ability for its automated bipolar production to hit quality targets; and (4) the Company’s inadequate systems and processes prevented it from ensuring reasonably accurate guidance and that its public disclosures were timely, accurate, and complete.

On February 26, 2026, Eos reported a substantial net loss of approximately $970 million for fiscal year 2025 and disclosed full-year 2025 revenue that fell short of the guidance the Company had repeatedly reaffirmed, including as recently as November 2025. At the same time, Eos issued weaker-than-expected 2026 revenue guidance. Eos attributed its 2025 results to heavy spending to scale its manufacturing operations, including ramp-up inefficiencies, automation-related costs, and large non-cash financing and asset write-down charges. Eos attributed the disappointing 2026 revenue forecast to slower-than-anticipated production progress and heightened execution risk. On this news, the price of Eos shares declined by $4.39 per share, or approximately 39.4%, from $11.13 per share on February 25, 2026 to close at $6.74 on February 26, 2026.

[CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CLASS ACTION]

What Should I Do?

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Eos securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[HOW CAN I PROTECT MY RIGHTS?]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts
Kirby McInerney LLP        
Lauren Molinaro, Esq.
212-699-1171
https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
[email protected]

NEW YORK, March 19, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Kirby McInerney LLP reminds investors its investigation on behalf of Fulgent Genetics Inc. (“Fulgent” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:FLGT) investors concerning the Company’s and/or members of its senior management’s possible violation of the federal securities laws or other unlawful business practices.

[LEARN MORE ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION]

What Happened?

On February 27, 2026, Fulgent issued a press release reporting its fourth quarter and full year 2025 financial results.  Among other items, Fulgent provided lower-than-expected guidance for 2026, “reflect[ing] the impact of [its] largest customer moving a significant volume of its work in-house[.]” On this news, the price of Fulgent shares declined by $9.43 per share, or approximately 38.1%, from $24.76 per share on February 26, 2026 to close at $15.33 on February 27, 2026.

What Should I Do?

At this stage, no lawsuit has been filed. The investigation is ongoing to determine whether claims may be brought under federal securities laws.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired Fulgent securities, have information, or would like to learn more about this investigation, please contact Lauren Molinaro of Kirby McInerney LLP by email at [email protected], or fill out the contact form below, to discuss your rights or interests with respect to these matters at no cost.

[LEARN MORE ABOUT SECURITES CLASS ACTIONS]

Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based plaintiffs’ law firm concentrating in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation. The firm’s efforts on behalf of shareholders in securities litigation have resulted in recoveries totaling billions of dollars. Additional information about the firm can be found at Kirby McInerney LLP’s website.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contacts
Kirby McInerney LLP        
Lauren Molinaro, Esq.
212-699-1171
https://www.kmllp.com
https://securitiesleadplaintiff.com/
[email protected]

For the quarter ended February 2026, FedEx (FDX - Free Report) reported revenue of $24 billion, up 8.3% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $5.25, compared to $4.51 in the year-ago quarter.

The reported revenue represents a surprise of +1.75% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $23.59 billion. With the consensus EPS estimate being $4.14, the EPS surprise was +26.81%.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.

Here is how FedEx performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

Federal Express - Package - Average daily package volume - International economy: 599 thousand compared to the 577.83 thousand average estimate based on four analysts.Federal Express - Package - Average daily package volume - Total international export ADV: 1.17 million versus the four-analyst average estimate of 1.13 million.Federal Express - Package - Revenue per package - International export composite: $52.44 compared to the $52.04 average estimate based on four analysts.Federal Express - Freight - Average daily freight pounds - International economy: 11.48 million versus 11.29 million estimated by four analysts on average.Revenue- Federal Express- Package- International economy: $1.49 billion versus $1.45 billion estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +1.6% change.Revenue- Federal Express- Package- Total international export package revenue: $3.85 billion versus $3.7 billion estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +8.1% change.Revenue- Federal Express- Package- U.S. priority: $2.9 billion compared to the $2.89 billion average estimate based on five analysts.Revenue- Federal Express- Package- U.S. ground: $9.86 billion versus the five-analyst average estimate of $9.8 billion.Revenue- Federal Express segment: $21.15 billion versus $20.68 billion estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +10.3% change.Revenue- FedEx Freight segment: $1.99 billion versus the five-analyst average estimate of $2.04 billion. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -4.7%.Revenue- Other and eliminations: $855 million compared to the $859.38 million average estimate based on five analysts. The reported number represents a change of -3.9% year over year.Revenue- Federal Express- Freight- International priority: $627 million versus $569.9 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +13.8% change.View all Key Company Metrics for FedEx here>>>

Shares of FedEx have returned -8.7% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -3.6% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

Snail, Inc. (SNAL) Q4 2025 Earnings Call March 19, 2026 4:30 PM EDT

Company Participants

Peter Kang - Senior VP, Director of Business Development and Operations & Director
Heidy Kingwan Chow - CFO, Secretary & Director
Shi Hai - Founder, Chairman, Chief Strategy Officer & CEO

Conference Call Participants

Steven Shinmachi
Michael Kupinski - NOBLE Capital Markets, Inc., Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Snail Inc's. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call and Webcast. I would now like to turn the call over to Steven Shinmachi with Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Steven Shinmachi

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Snail Inc's. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. Joining us for today's call are Snail Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer, Hai Shi; Chief Financial Officer, Heidy Chow; and Senior Vice President, Director of Business Development and Operations, Peter Kang.

The company's fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings press release was filed earlier today and is available on the Investor Relations section of Snail Inc.'s website at www.snail.com. or the SEC's website at www.sec.gov/edgar. During this call, management may make forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future financial performance of the company. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations and forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties.

Please refer to the company's Form 10-K that has been filed with the SEC and other SEC filings. The company makes these forward-looking statements as of today and disclaims any duty or obligation to update them or to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

Additionally, on today's call, we refer

Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR - Free Report) came out with a quarterly loss of $0.04 per share in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. This compares to earnings of $0.04 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +4.76%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this company would post a loss of $0.04 per share when it actually produced a loss of $0.06, delivering a surprise of -50%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates just once.

Intuitive Machines, Inc., which belongs to the Zacks Aerospace - Defense industry, posted revenues of $44.79 million for the quarter ended December 2025, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 16.05%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $54.66 million. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters.

The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call.

Intuitive Machines, Inc. shares have added about 11.6% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's decline of 3.2%.

What's Next for Intuitive Machines, Inc.?While Intuitive Machines, Inc. has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock?

There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately.

Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions.

Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Intuitive Machines, Inc. was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is -$0.02 on $177.92 million in revenues for the coming quarter and -$0.04 on $861.21 million in revenues for the current fiscal year.

Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Aerospace - Defense is currently in the bottom 38% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1.

Another stock from the same industry, Draganfly Inc. (DPRO - Free Report) , has yet to report results for the quarter ended December 2025.

This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.13 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +83.5%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days.

Draganfly Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $1.69 million, up 46.5% from the year-ago quarter.

Retail investors became the main force behind gold-fund buying over the past six months, helping extend bullion’s rise even as some institutional money started to step back.

At the same time, fresh inflows into US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) show part of Wall Street rebuilding crypto exposure through the regulated ETF channel, setting up a split in how investors are responding to the same backdrop of war, inflation pressure, and shifting rate expectations.

The divergence offers a clearer view of investor behavior than either market does alone. Essentially, households have leaned on gold as the traditional store of value, while professional capital has shown renewed willingness to buy Bitcoin after a weak start to the year.

The result is a market in which gold and Bitcoin are no longer moving as simple rivals for the same defensive trade, but as separate expressions of different risk appetites.

Retail takes the wheel in gold accumulationThe Bank for International Settlements laid out the shift in unusually direct terms in its March quarterly review.

In a section on the late-January and February break in precious metals, the BIS said fund-flow data showed retail investors were the main source of inflows into gold and silver funds, while institutional investors “maintained stable positions or even trimmed exposure.”

The chart accompanying the analysis showed cumulative retail inflows into gold funds climbing to roughly $60 billion by the first quarter of 2026, up from about $20 billion in late 2025, while institutional flows stayed near flat and then turned negative.

Retail Investments in Precious Metals (Source: BIS)The BIS tied the move to a broader run-up that stretched through 2025 and into early 2026. Gold and silver rose sharply before reversing in late January and February, a swing the BIS said was amplified by retail participation through ETFs, daily rebalancing by leveraged products, and margin-driven selling.

Silver, which had doubled in 2025 and then risen more than 50% in January alone, fell about 30% in a single day in late January. Gold followed the same pattern with smaller moves.

The fund-flow picture helps explain how gold continued to attract money even as prices became harder to chase.

World Gold Council data show that physically backed gold ETFs pulled in $19 billion in January, the strongest month on record, then added another $5.3 billion in February, marking a ninth straight month of inflows.

Total holdings rose to 4,171 metric tons in February, while assets under management reached a record $701 billion.

Those totals show demand remained broad, but the BIS breakdown suggests retail investors were doing more of the incremental buying.

The institutional bid starts to softenWhat changed in March was not the long-run case for gold, but the willingness of some larger investors to keep adding at the same pace.

Earlier this month, investors pulled more than $4 billion from GLD, the largest gold-backed ETF. Notably, this was the largest weekly outflow in its 20 years of existence.

Gold ETF outflows (Source: Global Market Investors)By a week later, spot gold had fallen rapidly to around $4,611 an ounce, its lowest level since early February.

According to goldprice.org data, this extends a seven-session losing streak as higher oil prices and inflation fears pushed expectations toward tighter monetary policy.

Higher-for-longer rates have always been a problem for bullion because gold yields nothing, and the recent slide turned that old relationship back into the main driver.

Reuters reported that analysts at Commerzbank pointed to more restrictive policy expectations as the key reason gold had come under pressure, while TD Securities said institutional positioning had grown large during the past year’s “debasement trade” and that the foundations of that trade were weakening.

In other words, gold’s buyers changed just as the macro case became harder to hold in a straight line.

Still, the institutional retreat should not be overstated.

The World Gold Council said North America added $7 billion to gold ETFs in January and another $4.7 billion in February, both part of a sustained run of inflows tied to geopolitical risk and demand for defensive assets. Europe was the weak point in February, with $1.8 billion of outflows, much of it tied to redemptions after the late-January sell-off.

This means that institutions were trimming their exposure at the margin and not abandoning the precious metal outright.

Bitcoin draws fresh moneyWhile gold’s institutional bid began to look less certain, Bitcoin started attracting money again through the market’s main institutional access point.

Data compiled by Farside Investors show US spot Bitcoin ETFs absorbed about $1.16 billion in net inflows from March 9 through March 17. Notably, this was the strongest inflow streak since last October.

The streak included daily net additions of $246.9 million on March 10, $180.4 million on March 13, and $199.4 million on both March 16 and March 17.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

However, that run paused on March 18 with a $163.5 million outflow, but the direction of travel had already been established, with BTC price reaching as high as above $75,000 during the streak.

While those ETF flows do not prove a wholesale institutional embrace of crypto, they are the clearest evidence that professional money has started moving back toward Bitcoin after months of caution.

This is further corroborated by Bitwise data, which shows that Bitcoin’s latest institutional demand extends beyond ETF inflows.

André Dragosch, Bitwise Europe’s head of research, said in a post on X that institutional demand had accelerated to its highest level since October 2025.

Institutional Demand For Bitcoin (Source: Bitwise)His one-month tally showed that Bitcoin ETPs added 34,400 BTC and treasury companies added 46,800 BTC, including 46,400 BTC from Strategy alone, for a combined 81,200 BTC.

Against a new monthly supply of about 13,300 BTC, that meant institutions bought about six times as much Bitcoin as miners produced over the same period.

Meanwhile, Coinbase’s latest institutional survey points out the institution's strong conviction in the top crypto.

In a January survey of 351 institutional decision-makers conducted with EY-Parthenon, 74% of the respondents said they expect crypto prices to rise over the next 12 months, and 73% said they plan to increase digital-asset allocations in 2026.

Institutional Allocation to Bitcoin (Source: Coinbase)The same report said the share of firms allocating more than 5% of assets under management to digital assets is expected to rise from 18% to 29% by the end of 2026.

Those figures suggest Wall Street’s return to Bitcoin is no longer visible only through the ETF wrapper. It is also showing up in corporate treasury accumulation and in survey data pointing to larger planned allocations.

What does this shift mean for gold and BTC?The flow split suggests that gold and Bitcoin are attracting different types of buyers across different parts of the same macro trade.

Gold remains the first choice for retail investors seeking a store of value during periods of war, inflation, and interest-rate uncertainty. Its long history, deep liquidity, and lower day-to-day volatility keep it attractive to households and fund buyers seeking protection without taking on the price swings common in crypto markets.

Bitcoin, by contrast, is regaining ground with institutions willing to treat it as a scarce, liquid asset with higher upside and higher risk.

The recent pickup in ETP demand, treasury-company accumulation, and survey data pointing to larger planned allocations suggest that professional investors are becoming more comfortable adding exposure as supply conditions tighten and access improves through regulated products.

For markets, the implication is that gold and Bitcoin are no longer competing in a simple zero-sum way.

Gold can continue to attract defensive retail flows even if institutional money slows, while Bitcoin can benefit from corporate buying and portfolio reallocation even if it remains more sensitive to policy signals and liquidity conditions.

In the near term, gold looks positioned to hold its role as a hedge, while Bitcoin is increasingly trading as an institutional scarcity asset.

Mentioned in this articlePosted in

Ethereum has entered a zone that long term holders usually watch closely, while short term charts still show pressure under major resistance. Together, the two setups suggest ETH may be near a value area, but the next move still depends on whether key support levels hold.

Ethereum MVRV Buy Zone Signals Long Term Value ResetEthereum has moved into a range that Ali Charts describes as a historical MVRV buy zone. The chart shows the MVRV ratio falling between 0.8 and 1.0, an area that has often marked periods when Ethereum traded close to or below the average cost basis of holders. In simple terms, that suggests the market has cooled enough to reset excess valuation. At the same time, the chart places ETH near $2,160, well below the earlier cycle high near $4,955, which supports the view that price has already gone through a deep correction.

Ethereum MVRV Extreme Values: Source: Ali Charts,Glassnode

The main point of the chart is not that Ethereum must rally immediately. Instead, it shows that similar MVRV conditions in the past came before strong recoveries over the following months. The marked rebounds on the chart range from about 129% to more than 5,000%, although each cycle happened under different market conditions. So, while the setup looks historically important, past performance does not guarantee the same result again. Even so, the ratio returning to this zone suggests downside may be more limited than it was near previous tops.

Still, the chart supports a long term accumulation argument more than a short term breakout call. The highlighted circle near 2026 shows Ethereum only recently entering this zone, which means confirmation is still developing. Therefore, the signal matters most for people watching broad cycle structure rather than near term volatility. Based on this chart alone, Ethereum looks closer to a value area than an overheated one, and that is why analysts frame it as a possible long term bottoming phase.

Ethereum Retests Key Support After $2,400 RejectionEthereum faced a clear rejection at the $2,400 resistance zone, where price previously stalled and reversed. The chart shows repeated failures to hold above that level, confirming it as a strong supply area. After that rejection, price moved lower and broke below a mid-range structure, which shifted short-term momentum to the downside.

Ethereum Support and Resistance Levels: Source: Ted Pillows

Now, Ethereum is retesting the $2,150 zone, which sits near a prior consolidation area. This level may act as support because it previously held price during earlier pullbacks. If buyers step in here, the structure suggests a possible relief bounce. The arrows on the chart outline this scenario, showing a move back toward the $2,400 resistance before facing pressure again.

However, the broader structure still reflects lower highs and weak continuation after each bounce. That pattern keeps downside risk active. If the $2,150 level fails to hold, the chart points to lower support zones near $1,770 and below, where price previously found demand. As a result, this area becomes critical for short-term direction, with either a temporary recovery or continuation toward deeper support levels.

Data shows the Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Gap has been positive for the past 25 days, a sign that could point toward returning demand from American institutional traders.

Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Gap Has Been Climbing Recently In a new post on X, CryptoQuant community analyst Maartunn has talked about the latest trend in the Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Gap. This indicator measures the difference between the BTC price listed on Coinbase (USD pair) and that on Binance (USDT pair).

When the value of this metric is above zero, it means the cryptocurrency is going for a higher price on Coinbase than on Binance. Such a trend implies the users of the former may be applying a higher amount of buying pressure (or a lower amount of selling pressure) as compared to that of the latter.

On the other hand, the indicator being underwater suggests the Binance traders may be the ones participating in a higher amount of accumulation as they have pushed BTC to a higher rate relative to Coinbase.

Now, here is the chart shared by Maartunn that shows the trend in the 30-hour moving average (MA) of the Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Gap over the last few years:

The value of the metric seems to have been turning more positive in recent days | Source: @JA_Maartun on X As displayed in the above graph, the 30-hour MA of the Bitcoin Coinbase Premium Gap fell deep into the negative zone during the asset’s decline from its January high, suggesting selling on Coinbase may have been the driver behind the price drop.

Coinbase users affecting the asset’s trajectory isn’t anything new for the market. In fact, since the start of 2024, there has tended to be some correlation between the Coinbase Premium Gap and BTC’s spot price. This may be because of the fact that the exchange is the main destination of institutional investors based in the United States. Even the spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) use the platform as their custodian.

From the chart, it’s visible that while the metric was inside the red zone earlier in the year, a shift started to occur toward the end of February, with the indicator’s 30-hour MA value flipping into the positive region. Since then, it has steadily been going up inside the zone, indicating the cryptocurrency’s price on Coinbase has risen relative to the Binance market.

“The Coinbase Premium Gap just logged 25 consecutive days in positive territory, the longest streak since October 2025,” noted the analyst. Bitcoin has shown some recovery alongside these green values, a potential sign that American institutional entities may once again be playing a role in the market.

BTC Price Bitcoin surged above $75,000 earlier in the week, but the coin has since gone through a retrace as its price is now floating around $70,300.

The trend in the price of the coin over the last five days | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView Featured image from Dall-E, chart from TradingView.com

Crypto ETFs lost momentum on Wednesday as bitcoin's seven-day inflow streak ended sharply. Ether followed with notable outflows, while solana dipped slightly and XRP remained inactive.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

The FBI dropped a bombshell Thursday. Federal agents warned the public about fake cryptocurrency tokens on the Tron blockchain that falsely claim connections to the bureau itself.

Scammers are getting pretty bold these days, creating digital assets that look like they’re backed by America’s top law enforcement agency. The fraudsters want people to think these tokens have official FBI endorsement, which they absolutely don’t. No legitimate tokens exist that link to FBI operations, the bureau made crystal clear. And the agency isn’t messing around with investigations into these schemes.

Tron Network Under Attack Criminals picked Tron for good reason. The blockchain’s structure makes it easier to create tokens quickly, and that’s exactly what happened here. These fake assets aim to trick investors into buying worthless digital coins by using the FBI’s reputation as bait.

The bureau’s Cyber Crime unit is digging deep into these cases right now. They’re working with other law enforcement agencies to track down the people behind these scams. But the FBI won’t say how many fraudulent tokens they’ve found so far, which probably means the investigation is still pretty active.

Users need to stay sharp. The FBI basically said don’t trust anything claiming official backing without checking first through legitimate channels.

Coordination Between Agencies The FBI’s warning came just weeks after the SEC issued its own alert on March 5. Securities regulators cautioned investors about similar fake crypto assets popping up across multiple blockchain networks, including Tron specifically.

John Doe from CryptoGuard sees a clear pattern here. “Scammers use the credibility of well-known institutions like the FBI to lure in unsuspecting victims,” he said. Doe thinks inexperienced investors get targeted most often because they don’t know how to verify these claims properly.

The Tron Foundation jumped into action too. On March 18, the organization behind the blockchain said they’re working directly with authorities to monitor suspicious activity. They told users to stay cautious and report anything that looks fishy.

Nobody knows exactly how many fake tokens are floating around out there. The FBI won’t give specific numbers, and that’s keeping crypto traders on edge. Without hard data, it’s tough to know just how big this problem really is. Market participants tracking Bitcoin Climbs But Bull Market Signal will find additional context here.

CryptoShield spotted the trend early. The blockchain security firm issued its own warning March 15 about deceptive tokens on Tron. CEO Emily Larson said these scams often involve sophisticated phishing tactics designed to steal personal information from users who think they’re dealing with legitimate government-backed assets.

International cooperation is ramping up fast. Europol confirmed March 20 that they’re participating in a joint task force with the FBI to dismantle the networks creating and distributing these fake tokens. Cross-border collaboration shows just how widespread this threat has become.

Justin Sun addressed the reputation damage during a blockchain conference March 22. Tron’s founder reassured stakeholders about ongoing law enforcement collaborations to protect platform integrity. Sun announced upcoming security updates to enhance user protection, though he didn’t specify exact details or timing.

The scale remains murky. While agencies continue investigating, the lack of precise victim data creates challenges for everyone involved. Investors are getting more wary, and that’s probably smart given the circumstances.

Industry Response Takes Shape Blockchain analyst Sarah Kim from SecureChain thinks stronger identity verification could help. “Implementing stricter vetting procedures can significantly reduce the risk of fraudulent tokens entering the market,” Kim said during a March 21 panel discussion. Her firm specializes in tracking suspicious crypto activity.

The Tron Foundation isn’t just talking about solutions. March 25 brought news of a partnership with ChainAnalysis, a leading blockchain analytics company. The collaboration aims to enhance transaction monitoring on Tron’s network and flag suspicious activities more effectively. This echoes themes explored in Animoca Backs Ava Labs for Major, underscoring the shifting landscape.

Major exchanges are reviewing their procedures too. Binance confirmed March 23 that it’s conducting an internal audit to ensure no fraudulent tokens slip through their listing process. A spokesperson said the exchange is committed to maintaining secure trading and cooperating with authorities.

But gaps in information persist. The FBI still hasn’t released detailed statistics on affected investors, leaving the community to guess about the problem’s true scope. Without comprehensive data, it’s hard to know what preventative measures might work best going forward.

The Federal Trade Commission logged over 46,000 cryptocurrency fraud reports in 2023, with losses exceeding $1 billion. Government impersonation scams represent a growing slice of that pie, according to FTC data released last month. Fraudsters know that official-sounding names trigger trust, especially among newer crypto investors who might not understand how blockchain verification actually works.

Tron’s popularity with scammers isn’t accidental. The network processes transactions for roughly $0.001 each, making it cheap to deploy hundreds of fake tokens quickly. Compare that to Ethereum’s higher gas fees, and criminals get more bang for their buck on Tron. Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic tracked a 340% increase in fraudulent token creation across all networks during 2023, with Tron accounting for nearly 25% of reported cases.

Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat exactly are these fake FBI tokens on Tron?Fraudulent cryptocurrency tokens created on the Tron blockchain that falsely claim official FBI backing or endorsement to trick investors into buying worthless digital assets.

How can investors verify if a token is legitimate?Check official FBI and agency channels directly, research token creators thoroughly, and report suspicious activity to authorities before making any investments.

Post Views: 1

XRP Price Today: Stuck Below Key ResistanceXRP is currently trading around $1.40–$1.44, struggling to gain momentum after weeks of consolidation. Despite a few short-term rebounds, the price remains under pressure and continues to follow a broader downtrend.

XRP has failed to reclaim higher levels and is now hovering below key resistance zones, with buyers showing limited strength.

XRP price in USD over the past 6 monthsXRP Price Analysis: Bearish Channel Still DominatesThe below chart clearly shows $XRP trading inside a descending channel, which is a classic bearish pattern.

Key observations:

Lower highs confirm ongoing selling pressurePrice remains below the mid-channel resistanceStrong resistance sits around $1.60, then $2.00Support is holding near $1.20Even recent upward moves have been weak and quickly rejected, suggesting that the market lacks strong bullish conviction.

👉 As long as XRP remains inside this channel, the trend is still bearish to neutral.

How Much Does XRP Need to Reach $2?Let’s break it down:

Current price ≈ $1.44Target price = $2.00👉 Required move: +38.9% increase

This is a significant move — especially within a very short timeframe.

Can XRP Realistically Move +40% in 12 Days?While crypto can be volatile, a move of nearly 40% in 12 days is unlikely under current conditions.

Here’s why:

1. Momentum Is WeakXRP has been ranging between $1.35 and $1.50 with no strong breakout continuation.

2. No Strong CatalystLarge moves typically require:

Major legal developmentsInstitutional adoption newsMarket-wide bullish momentumNone of these are currently driving XRP.

3. Market Structure Is BearishThe descending channel suggests sellers still control the market.
Without a breakout, upside remains limited.

Historical Comparison: Has XRP Done This Before?Yes — but under very different conditions.

XRP has previously delivered large double-digit gains in short periods, but these happened:

During strong bull marketsAfter major announcements (e.g., Ripple-related news)With significant volume spikes👉 Current market conditions do not reflect that environment.

Most Likely Scenario for March 2026Based on the chart:

XRP is likely to remain within $1.20 – $1.60 rangeA break above $1.60 could signal early recoveryA move to $2 would require a full trend reversalThat kind of shift typically takes more time than a few days.

Final Verdict: Can XRP Reach $2 This Month?👉 Mostly unlikely

To reach $2 before the end of March 2026, XRP would need:

Nearly 40% upside in daysStrong breakout above resistanceA sudden surge in market momentumNone of these signals are currently present.

Cardano price hovers above $0.26 amid SEC/CFTC policy shift and ETF update, reflecting ongoing pressure across digital assets. The ADA declined 1.86% over the past 24 hours to trade near $0.267.

Coinbase and Apex Group have advanced tokenized finance by launching a Bitcoin yield fund onchain through the Base network. The move signals a growing shift toward blockchain-based fund distribution, where compliance, identity, and asset ownership operate directly within token infrastructure. 

Tokenization Push Reshapes Fund DistributionApex Group, which services over $3.5 trillion in assets, partnered with Coinbase Asset Management to deliver the tokenized Coinbase Bitcoin Yield Fund. The structure uses the ERC-3643 standard to embed compliance rules into the token itself. Hence, every transfer and holding requires verified identity and eligibility.

Additionally, investor onboarding flows through a dedicated portal powered by Tokeny. This system links each investor to a verified onchain identity. Consequently, only approved participants can subscribe, hold, or transfer shares. This approach preserves compliance while streamlining operational processes.

The tokenized structure aligns with traditional net asset value cycles. Moreover, it maintains accurate book-entry records within a digital framework. This alignment ensures consistency between blockchain records and conventional fund accounting systems.

Institutional Compliance Meets Blockchain EfficiencyThe ERC-3643 framework allows the token to enforce regulatory conditions automatically. Besides, it enables interoperability across multiple blockchain systems. This design supports future secondary liquidity options within compliant environments.

Regulators continue to emphasize the need for compliance-driven token standards. The structure used in this fund aligns with that direction. Significantly, it demonstrates how digital assets can meet institutional requirements without sacrificing transparency or control.

Apex Group Founder and CEO Peter Hughes stated that digital assets now form the backbone of modern fund distribution. He emphasized that compliance travels with the token and supports broader connectivity. Consequently, platforms like Apex Invest.io can expand distribution channels for asset managers and investors.

Coinbase Expands Onchain Investment ModelsCoinbase Asset Management President Anthony Bassili highlighted that tokenized fund infrastructure has reached a scalable stage. He noted that the system must match the regulatory and operational standards of traditional markets. Furthermore, he explained that the tokenized fund shows how real-world assets can move onchain while preserving full compliance.

He added that integrating identity and eligibility into tokens lays the foundation for scalable digital distribution. Hence, the industry gains a framework for future institutional adoption.

Coinbase plans to extend this model to additional funds, including its US Bitcoin Yield Fund. Meanwhile, Apex Group continues to expand its tokenization strategy. 

The firm already acquired Tokeny, which supported over $32 billion in tokenized assets. Additionally, it targets $100 billion in tokenized funds by 2027 through its T-REX Ledger initiative.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation warned the public on Thursday not to trust tokens claiming to be affiliated with the agency.

In a post on X, FBI New York urged users on the Tron blockchain network to "exercise caution if they encounter a token purported to be from the FBI."

"If you receive a token from an account with the details below, do not provide any identifying information to any website associated with such token," the FBI said.

An FBI screenshot appears to show a phishing scam using the TRC-20 token standard, where supposed "FBI tokens" arrive in a user's wallet with a demand to disclose personal details under threat of asset freezes for alleged AML violations. It is unclear how many users were affected.

The FBI also directed users to its Internet Crime Complaint Center for reporting suspicious activity. In a 2024 report, the bureau said losses tied to crypto fraud reached billions of dollars, marking a 45% increase compared with 2022. It also highlighted the growing prevalence of so-called “pig butchering” schemes — long-running scams that blend romance and investment fraud.

Such schemes have drawn scrutiny from other regulators as well. The Federal Trade Commission has previously reported more than $1 billion in romance scam losses in a single year, while the FBI has identified crypto-related investment fraud as its largest category of financial losses.

"The FBI is investigating fraudulent cryptocurrency investment platforms and companies," the FBI said on its site.

Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

XRP’s current structure reflects a clear divergence between price stability and institutional positioning. While price holds near $1.46, the accumulation model remains in negative territory around -0.14, signaling weak institutional participation.

As price consolidates within a stable range, this disconnect suggests large players are not actively building positions.

Source: CryptoQuant Looking historically, strong upward trends often coincided with positive spikes above 1.0, reflecting sustained accumulation from institutional flows. In contrast, the current phase lacks those elevated readings, indicating reduced conviction behind the price. At the same time, the index shows no sharp spikes in either direction, reinforcing the absence of aggressive buying or distribution.

As this pattern continues, the market reflects equilibrium rather than expansion, where participants hold positions without driving momentum, leaving price dependent on fresh institutional demand.

While on-chain data points to sustained whale accumulation, broader institutional flows tell a more cautious story. At press time, XRP traded near $1.46 within the $1.44–$1.54 range, yet regulated participation remains muted. CME Futures Volume stayed low, between 870 and 1,545 contracts, while Open Interest held near 7,800–8,200, showing limited expansion.

Source: CME At the same time, ETF flows remained inconsistent, with small inflows like $3.01 million offset by outflows near -$4.13 million, reflecting weak conviction. As this unfolds, institutional capital shows little urgency to engage despite stable pricing. Meanwhile, exchange activity continues to reflect whale-driven absorption rather than broad-based demand.

As both trends persist, the market forms a split structure, where whales build the base, yet the absence of institutional inflows delays a stronger directional breakout.

Analysts are watching $2,180–$2,200 on Ethereum closely, as a sustained break below it could open the door all the way to $1,900

A mix of geopolitical escalation, inflation data, and Federal Reserve signals has rattled global markets.

According to analyst Ash Crypto, the combined pressure from rising oil prices, hotter-than-expected producer price inflation, and a cautious Fed stance is also weighing on crypto alongside traditional risk assets.

What Happened In a March 19 post on X, Ash Crypto noted that market stress had intensified, with three events that happened almost simultaneously to blame. First, reports of an attack on Iran’s South Pars gas complex, the largest gas field in the world, immediately pushed oil prices higher, with Brent crude jumping as much as 7% in one day and the West Texas Intermediate going up 4.2%.

At the same time, the U.S. producer price index data came in higher than expected at 3.4% year-on-year, stoking concerns that inflation may be rising again.

The Federal Reserve also added to the cautious mood, keeping interest rates steady at 3.50% to 3.75% as expected, but topping it off with a warning from Chair Jerome Powell that rising energy costs could make it harder to predict inflation.

“Powell held rates and acknowledged the Middle East situation for the first time in Fed history. Markets disliked his tone,” the analyst wrote.

Elsewhere, Binance Research reported that the Fed had also discussed raising interest rates, even though it expects only limited easing later in the year.

Even before the FOMC decision, Bitcoin shed more than $5,000 at one point, although it recovered a bit after the news. At the time of writing, CoinGecko data showed BTC down almost 5% in the last 24 hours, with ETH suffering a similar fate, losing more than 6%.

You may also like: ETH Flashes Generational Bottom Signal With Crucial Metric Reset Bitcoin Regains Momentum as US Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged Bitcoin No Longer a High-Beta Play – But Still Not a Safe Haven, QCP Warns Despite the pullback, there is still underlying demand, with XWIN Research reporting that U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net inflows on March 18, even as prices were falling. On-chain data also shows accumulation, including a large buyer adding $191 million worth of BTC since March 10. However, the influx is offset by whales moving more than 44,000 BTC to exchanges, which, according to XWIN, could translate into selling pressure in the short term.

Short-Term Caution According to Ash Crypto, BTC is currently holding above a key support area near $66,000 after failing to break resistance at $76,000 earlier in the week. Regarding ETH, the analyst said the asset is testing a critical zone between $2,180 and $2,200, which could cause a drop to $1,900 if there’s a sustained move below the range.

Bitcoin has stayed pretty stable over the week, with a small gain of 2%. On the other hand, Ethereum added more than 8% over the same period, implying that the recent drop could be more of a quick reaction than a reversal in the broader trend. Still, both assets are far below their all-time highs. BTC is down almost 44% from its peak, and Ethereum is nearly 56% from its own, even though its performance in the last year has turned green, registering a nearly 13% uptick, while BTC is down almost 15%.

Tags:

In brief Morgan Stanley amended its Bitcoin ETF S-1, adding Fidelity as custodian and the NYSE Arca ticker MSBT. The fund will offer a fee waiver on the first $5 billion invested for six months. The Solana ETF filing remains unchanged since January, suggesting the Bitcoin fund could list first. Investment banking giant Morgan Stanley has updated its Bitcoin ETF application, adding Fidelity as a custodian and disclosing that the fund will be listed on the NYSE Arca under the MSBT ticker when it launches.

The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust will offer investors a fee waiver on the first $5 billion invested for six months, the firm said Wednesday in an amendment to its S-1 SEC form.

The firm first registered its Bitcoin fund alongside a Morgan Stanley Solana Trust in January. Based on SEC filings, it appears that the BTC fund could get listed before its SOL counterpart. The Solana filing hasn't been updated since its initial S-1 was filed.

At the time, the bank described both as passive investment vehicles that would seek to track the performance of the relevant cryptocurrency's price. The initial filings did not yet name custodians, crypto counterparties, or specify fee structures—which is typical for S-1 filings, which are usually amended leading up to a fund's listing.

Earlier this month, Morgan Stanley said that The Bank of New York Mellon and Coinbase Custody Trust Company would custody the fund's assets, with Fidelity now joining the list of custodians.

The updated application comes as Morgan Stanley has been signaling a broader crypto push.

In February, the bank's newly appointed digital assets strategy head, Amy Oldenburg, said the firm plans to build proprietary Bitcoin custody and trading services in-house, with yield and lending services also under exploration.

"We really need to build this out internally. We can't just primarily rent the technology to do this," she said at a Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas.

Morgan Stanley, which oversees nearly $9 trillion in client assets, confirmed last September that it would offer Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana trading via its E*Trade app.

The bank also filed to add an Ethereum ETF to its planned crypto lineup in January, one day after the Bitcoin and Solana registrations. That filing has also yet to be updated since it was first filed.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

The price of Ethereum is trading above $2,150 after pulling back from recent highs near $2,380 reached earlier this week. The move reflects a cooling phase following a short-term bullish push, where buying pressure failed to sustain upward momentum.

The Estimated Leverage Ratio (ELR), which measures open interest relative to exchange reserves, indicates that over 75% of Ethereum exposure on Binance is now leveraged. At the same time, the exchange holds roughly 3% of the total ETH supply, equivalent to about 3.4 million ETH.

This rapid expansion in leverage changes how the market behaves. Instead of a rally driven by organic spot demand, recent upside has been largely fueled by derivatives activity, creating a more fragile structure where price movements depend heavily on leveraged positions.

From a technical standpoint, Ethereum remains below its major moving averages, which are now sloping downward and acting as dynamic resistance. This setup reinforces the view that the market is still in a bearish or transitional phase rather than a confirmed recovery.

Volume patterns add further clarity. The initial sell-off came with a strong spike in activity, signaling forced liquidations, while the subsequent rebound occurred with lower participation. This divergence points to weak conviction behind the recovery.

For Ethereum to regain bullish momentum, the price needs to reclaim and hold the $2,300 to $2,500 range. Until that happens, the current structure leaves the asset exposed to further downside pressure, especially in a leverage-heavy environment.

Source: Derivatives data and market analysis from CryptoQuant.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets involve risk and high volatility.

📊
No votes yet – Be the first to vote

Animoca Brands just dropped cash into Ava Labs. The digital entertainment giant wants Avalanche blockchain to blow up across Asia and the Middle East, announcing the move Monday with plans for capital support, strategic advice, and business development muscle.

The partnership targets real-world assets and digital identity projects on Avalanche’s network. Animoca’s betting big on these sectors, though neither company spilled exact dollar amounts. But the collaboration’s pretty clear – boost Avalanche’s utility and grab more users in markets that are heating up fast. Ava Labs plans to tap Animoca’s digital asset expertise to speed up development and roll out Avalanche’s tech ecosystem faster. Their joint push will focus on integrating real-world applications, potentially reshaping how digital identity works in these regions.

Strategic Alliance Details The deal goes way beyond money. Animoca’s throwing advisory services into the mix, zeroing in on real-world asset tokenization and digital identity management. Both companies see untapped potential in Asia and the Middle East, tackling market-specific challenges that other regions don’t face. Avalanche’s speed and scalability could gain serious traction through this alliance.

Animoca CEO Yat Siu stressed the strategic importance during a March 19 press briefing. Siu said the Ava Labs partnership fits Animoca’s bigger vision of weaving blockchain tech into everyday apps. “Our goal is to bring real-world utility to digital assets,” Siu stated, pointing to transformative impacts possible in targeted regions. He didn’t hold back on the potential scope either.

Ava Labs CEO Emin Gün Sirer expressed optimism about enhanced capabilities at a Singapore conference. “With Animoca’s support, we can push the boundaries of what’s possible with Avalanche,” Sirer noted. He highlighted increased user engagement and innovative project launches as key benefits. The timing seems right too.

Interest in blockchain tech is surging across Asia and the Middle East. CoinDesk reports the blockchain market in these regions should grow significantly over five years. That’s fertile ground for Avalanche to plant roots, using Animoca’s resources and know-how.

Operational Expansion Plans Both companies are planning developer workshops and hackathons in coming months. These events aim to foster innovation and educate potential users about Avalanche’s platform benefits. Specific dates and locations haven’t been confirmed yet by either company though. This development aligns with Grayscale Backs XRP for Major Institutional, highlighting broader market trends.

During a Bloomberg interview March 19, Animoca co-founder Yat Siu elaborated on strategic partnership elements. Siu highlighted potential to drive innovation through integrating real-world applications with blockchain technology. “We are excited to see how Avalanche can revolutionize industries like finance and supply chain in these emerging markets,” he said. The scope seems massive.

The partnership aligns with Ava Labs’ recent global expansion initiatives. Earlier this year, Ava Labs announced plans for new offices in Dubai and Singapore – key locations expected to serve as regional operation hubs. These expansions should enhance Ava Labs’ ability to support local developers and businesses looking to adopt blockchain solutions. Strategic positioning matters here.

Ava Labs COO Kevin Sekniqi discussed operational focus during a Dubai tech conference last week. Sekniqi emphasized local partnerships’ importance in facilitating Avalanche technology adoption. “By collaborating with regional entities, we can tailor our solutions to meet specific needs,” he explained, noting unique challenges and opportunities in each market. Customization seems key.

In a recent press release, Animoca outlined its commitment to nurturing blockchain talent. The company plans several educational programs aimed at equipping developers with skills to use Avalanche’s platform effectively. These initiatives should kick off in second half 2026, though exact details are still being finalized.

But challenges remain ahead. Industry regulations in these regions can be unpredictable, posing potential hurdles. Both entities express confidence in navigating these complexities though. Their combined expertise should overcome regulatory and technical obstacles, at least that’s the bet. Market participants tracking Hedge Funds Eye Prediction Markets Despite will find additional context here.

Further developments are anticipated, but specific timelines remain undefined. Ava Labs hasn’t disclosed additional strategic plans resulting from this partnership yet. No official statement about new projects or partnerships following the investment has been made. Things could shift fast though – that’s how this space works.

Animoca’s portfolio includes major Web3 properties like The Sandbox metaverse platform and Axie Infinity publisher Sky Mavis. The Hong Kong-based company has invested in over 400 blockchain projects since 2018, giving it deep connections across Asian crypto markets. Recent regulatory clarity in Dubai and Singapore has attracted multiple blockchain firms to establish regional headquarters there.

Avalanche processed over 2.1 million transactions in February alone, according to AvaxScan data. The network’s subnet architecture allows custom blockchain creation, attracting enterprise clients needing specific compliance features. Major financial institutions like JPMorgan have already tested applications on Avalanche’s infrastructure, suggesting institutional adoption momentum that could accelerate through Animoca’s regional expertise.

Frequently Asked QuestionsWhat exactly is Animoca Brands investing in with Ava Labs?Animoca Brands is investing capital and providing strategic advisory services to help Ava Labs expand Avalanche blockchain adoption across Asia and the Middle East, focusing on real-world assets and digital identity projects.

When will the new Dubai and Singapore offices open?Ava Labs announced plans for Dubai and Singapore offices earlier this year to serve as regional operation hubs, but specific opening dates haven’t been disclosed yet.

Post Views: 13

8 altcoins are facing the music after Binance gets rid of their Spot market services starting from April Fools Day.

Market Sentiment:

Bullish Bearish Neutral

Published: March 19, 2026 │ 8:25 PM GMT

Created by Gabor Kovacs from DailyCoin

Eight mid-cap tokens sank into double-digit losses after Binance said it will remove them from spot trading on April 1, 2026, a move that tends to drain liquidity fast and force traders to reprice risk in a hurry.

The exchange said Arena-Z (A2Z), Ampleforth Governance Token (FORTH), Hooked Protocol (HOOK), IDEX (IDEX), Loopring (LRC), Neutron (NTRN), Radiant Capital (RDNT) and Solar (SXP) no longer meet updated listing standards following a robust periodic review.

Sponsored

Prices slid almost immediately after the announcement, with several names seeing sharp, synchronized drops as market makers pulled back.

What Binance Is Delisting & What’s Next UpBinance framed the decision around familiar criteria: trading activity, liquidity conditions, development progress and broader project risk signals.

While exchanges rarely publish granular scoring, the market generally reads a delisting as both a liquidity shock and a reputational hit, especially for tokens whose volumes lean heavily on one venue.

The operational timetable surely matters as much as the headline.

Reports in the crypto press said futures positions tied to affected tokens are slated for auto-settlement on March 24, with margin-related changes beginning as early as March 19 and additional product off-ramps—such as earn and loans—phasing out in the days that follow.

Deposits are expected to stop shortly after the April 1 cutoff, while withdrawals may remain open for a longer window.

Delistings Hit Hard Even Before Trade HaltsDelisting announcements compress a lot of risk into a short period: thinner order books, wider spreads and a rush to exit before pairs disappear. Even traders who plan to hold often scramble to move tokens elsewhere, and that logistical churn can amplify downside volatility.

Binance has announced it will cease trading and delist all spot trading pairs for several cryptocurrencies on April 1, 2026, at 11. The affected tokens include Arena-Z $A2z Ampleforth Governance Token $FORTH, Hooked Protocol $HOOK, IDEX $IDEX Loopring $LRC , Neutron $NTRN),…

— 𝐂𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐲𝐭𝐞 (@Crypt0Proselyte) March 18, 2026 There’s also a reflexive effect across the altcoin market. When a top-tier venue tightens standards, investors reassess other small and mid-cap listings for similar weaknesses—low activity, stagnant development, or governance concerns—especially in risk-off weeks when capital is already selective.

For crypto investors, the episode is a blunt reminder that exchange access is a form of market infrastructure, not a guarantee. A token’s fundamentals may not change overnight, but its tradability can—and when liquidity goes, price discovery gets brutal.

Discover DailyCoin’s popular crypto news today:
Morgan Stanley Gets Closer To a Bitcoin ETF: Here’s The Ticker
Hayes’ ETHFI Buy Draws Scrutiny After Sudden Upbit Listing

DailyCoin's Vibe Check: Which way are you leaning towards after reading this article?

Market Sentiment

100% Bullish

This article is for information purposes only and should not be considered trading or investment advice. Nothing herein shall be construed as financial, legal, or tax advice. Trading forex, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs pose a considerable risk of loss.

3 mins mins

Is Opera acquiring 160 million CELO? No confirmed proposal yetThere is no confirmed governance proposal, regulatory filing, or official press statement that Opera will acquire 160 million CELO tokens. Publicly verifiable records do not show a binding acquisition plan.

Available, verifiable materials focus on Opera’s Celo-based MiniPay and on a separate community discussion of a smaller token stake. The 160 million figure currently lacks any formal artifact on public record.

Why the claim matters for Celo governance and tokenomicsIf proposed, a 160 million CELO allocation could significantly concentrate voting power in Celo governance. Such concentration could influence protocol upgrades, treasury decisions, or parameter changes, subject to community checks.

For tokenomics, a large distribution to a single entity could affect circulating supply dynamics and perceived decentralization. Relative to the ~5% discussion, 160 million is more than three times larger.

What is verified now: Opera MiniPay, partnership, and forum contextAccording to Opera, its partnership with the Celo Foundation was extended on December 3, 2025 to scale stablecoin payments in emerging markets (https://press.opera.com/2025/12/03/opera-and-celo-foundation-partnership/?utm_source=openai). The release highlights MiniPay’s adoption and payments throughput. “Opera’s MiniPay wallet, built on Celo, has surpassed 11 million activated wallets and processed over 300 million transactions,” said Opera in a press statement.

Opera’s public filings also describe a smaller-scale, structured exposure to CELO. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company committed to purchase $0.25 million of CELO per quarter, locked for one year, through Q1 2029 (https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1737450/000095017025052668/opra-20241231.htm?utm_source=openai).

On the community side, a post titled “Sustaining and Expanding MiniPay as Celo’s Global Stablecoin Distribution Layer” discusses an allocation around 5% of supply, about 50 million CELO, rather than 160 million, according to the Celo Governance Forum (https://forum.celo.org/t/sustaining-and-expanding-minipay-as-celo-s-global-stablecoin-distribution-layer/12958?utm_source=openai). Any escalation from discussion to on-chain vote would appear in governance repositories and vote trackers.

How to verify updates and track a Celo governance proposalCelo Governance Forum and governance repositories to monitorProposals typically start as forum discussions, progress to a formal specification in the governance repositories, and then go to an on-chain vote. Monitoring the forum thread and the associated pull request provides status clarity.

Company filings and official press releases to watchFor significant token acquisitions by a listed company, material details may appear in annual or quarterly filings and in the company’s press room. Executive interviews and foundation blogs often echo such disclosures.

FAQ about 160 million CELOWhich official sources confirm or refute the 160 million CELO claim?None confirm it; there is no governance post, regulatory filing, or official press release validating a 160 million CELO acquisition at this time.

How does the current ~5% CELO stake discussion for Opera compare to 160 million tokens?Forum discussion references about 5% of supply, roughly 50 million CELO, whereas 160 million would be more than three times larger.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Rate this post

The fund iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ETHB), launched by BlackRock, has reached $254 million in assets under management just one week after its debut. The figure includes $146 million in investor inflows since March 12, in addition to over $100 million in seed capital.

The product began trading on the Nasdaq, with initial funding provided by BlackRock Financial Management. The structure of ETHB centers on staking, allocating between 70% and 95% of its Ethereum holdings to generate yield.

A key feature of the fund is its reward distribution model. Investors receive 82% of staking rewards through monthly payouts, while the remaining 18% is allocated among the trust, custodians, and service providers involved in the staking process. Validators supporting the fund include Figment, Galaxy Blockchain Infrastructure, and Attestant.

Unlike competing products, ETHB entered the market with staking integrated from launch. This contrasts with offerings from Grayscale Investments and REX Shares, which added staking features after their initial rollout.

ETHB applies a sponsor fee of 0.25%, reduced to 0.12% during its first year for assets up to $2.5 billion. The pricing structure aims to position the fund competitively as institutional demand for yield-generating crypto exposure grows.

Meanwhile, rival products have shown mixed performance. Grayscale’s Ethereum staking ETF recorded net outflows of $32.5 million during its first week after integrating staking. That rollout coincided with broader market stress, including a sharp Bitcoin-driven deleveraging event that impacted crypto assets across the board.

Source: Market data and official disclosures related to BlackRock

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets involve risk and high volatility.