Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong responded to criticism over the company’s promotion of high-risk products to young and financially vulnerable users. He called for responsible product design that does not restrict adult choice.

Zcash founder Zooko publicly criticized Coinbase for promoting sports betting and Bitcoin (BTC) price prediction to inexperienced users. Armstrong acknowledged the tension, noting that companies must balance user freedom against platform responsibility.

The CEO argued on X that companies should not aggressively promote high-risk products to unsophisticated users. A clear distinction exists between making products available and actively pushing them on people least equipped to handle the risks.

Three practical measures followed from that position. Platforms should offer clearer risk disclosures, built-in financial literacy tools, and user preference settings to control which products appear. Together, these options could create a more personalized experience without removing adult access.

Additionally, Zooko’s criticism targeted how Coinbase surfaces Bitcoin price prediction and sports betting to inexperienced users. That kind of aggressive in-app promotion crosses a line, Armstrong said, even if the products themselves remain available.

Interesting — and I appreciate the take.

I think there’s a balance here.

I’m pro-freedom. Consenting adults should be able to do what they want with their own money, as long as they’re not harming others. I don’t want companies patronizing users or dictating what they can do…

— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) June 28, 2026 Criticism Arrives as Coinbase Expands Its ReachThe Coinbase chief recently commented on Coinbase’s Bitcoin market view, noting AI cost reductions alongside broader product expansion. Responsible design, he suggested, needs to accompany that growth rather than trail it. However, those ambitions now face questions about whether user safety has kept pace.

Meanwhile, scrutiny of Coinbase’s 2026 product direction reflects the broader sentiment around the company’s trajectory. Critics have argued that feature expansion has outpaced user protections. That tension sharpened further with Zooko’s public call-out this week.

Beyond the exchange, Coinbase’s Base chain B20 push and Coinbase Luxembourg MiCA hub show a widening footprint. That scope makes it harder to enforce product design standards uniformly across user segments.

Coinbase (COIN) Stock 1-Year Performance Chart. Source: NasdaqThe CEO also addressed whether sports prediction markets should exist at all. Private companies should not decide that question on their own. Instead, democratic processes are better suited to establish those limits.

The position separates two types of responsibility. How a platform promotes products differs from whether those products should exist.

The Coinbase CEO supports tighter design standards, including opt-in controls and personalized risk settings. Nevertheless, the case for regulatory rather than corporate limits remains central to that position.

Stacks has secured a place in Coinbase’s COIN50 Index, the exchange’s flagship benchmark that tracks the 50 largest and most liquid digital assets. STX sits at roughly the 40th position with an index market cap of around $319.6 million and a weight of 0.04%.

What the COIN50 Index actually is Coinbase launched the COIN50 Index on November 12, 2024, as a transparent benchmark for institutional investors looking to gauge the broader crypto market without manually sorting through thousands of tokens.

The index is weighted heavily toward the obvious giants. Bitcoin commands roughly 50% of the total weight, with Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and even Dogecoin rounding out the top positions. The remaining assets, including STX, occupy the long tail with individually small weightings.

Advertisement

Coinbase also built a perpetual futures contract tied to the COIN50, giving traders a single instrument to express a view on the entire top-50 basket.

A 0.04% weight means Stacks isn’t moving the needle on any portfolio allocation by itself. But inclusion in the index signals that STX meets Coinbase’s liquidity and market cap thresholds, which are the same filters institutional compliance teams use when deciding what’s investable and what isn’t.

Why Stacks matters in the Bitcoin Layer 2 conversation Stacks occupies an unusual niche. It’s a smart contract platform that settles transactions on Bitcoin, effectively giving Bitcoin programmability without modifying Bitcoin’s base layer. The protocol enables mining rewards, staking, and decentralized applications, all anchored to Bitcoin’s security model. Its flagship product in this regard is sBTC, a Bitcoin-backed asset designed to let holders earn yield while keeping their BTC exposure intact.

The protocol also completed an integration with Fireblocks on June 17, 2026, the institutional custody and settlement platform. That integration matters because Fireblocks is the plumbing behind many of the largest crypto funds and trading desks. If an institution can’t custody an asset through its existing infrastructure, it typically won’t touch it. Fireblocks support removes that friction.

What this means for investors STX’s $319.6 million index market cap makes it one of the smaller constituents in the COIN50. Smaller assets in weighted indexes can get dropped during quarterly rebalances if their market cap or liquidity deteriorates. Staying in the index requires Stacks to maintain its current market position, which is far from guaranteed in a sector where rankings shift quickly.

For traders, the COIN50 inclusion creates a subtle but real liquidity benefit. Index-linked products generate baseline trading volume, and market makers who arbitrage the index against its components will naturally add depth to STX order books.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Cryptocurrency analysts have noted that the 200-week simple moving average stands out as a significant bottoming indicator for Bitcoin in long-term market cycles.

Analyst Ali Martinez, evaluating Bitcoin’s price trend over the past 10 years, stated that periods when the price historically touched or fell below this average generally presented long-term accumulation opportunities.

According to Martinez, Bitcoin has recorded strong gains in past cycles after touching the 200-week moving average. Historical data shows that after testing this level in 2015, 2018, 2020, and 2022, Bitcoin gained 8,500%, 267%, 1,125%, and 680% respectively.

Currently, Bitcoin’s 200-week moving average is at $63,500. Analysts believe that a price trading below $60,000 indicates that the market has entered a long-term accumulation zone.

However, Ali Martinez pointed out that the risk of a short-term pullback persists. He stated that the Bitcoin price could fall to $54,000, and in a more severe scenario, the $40,000 level could come into play. According to Martinez, the $63,500 level is being watched as a critical bull-bear divide for Bitcoin. If the price regains this level and maintains its position above it, it could signal the beginning of a new bull market.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has responded after Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox criticized the exchange over alleged betting prompts inside the Coinbase app.

Summary

Coinbase CEO backs user choice but warns high-risk products need careful in-app promotion rules. Zooko’s complaint turned Coinbase prediction markets into a debate over vulnerable users and app design. Coinbase’s broader product push adds betting-style markets while regulators argue over sports event contracts nationwide. The exchange chief defended user choice, but said platforms should treat high-risk products with care when serving less experienced users.

Zooko criticizes betting prompts Zooko said on X that he had spoken with a young and financially vulnerable Coinbase user. He claimed the app had started prompting that user to bet on sports and the price of Bitcoin.

He said the situation made him “ashamed” to be part of the crypto industry. His post quickly turned into a wider debate about how large crypto apps should promote prediction markets and similar products.

The criticism comes as Coinbase expands beyond spot crypto trading. Recent coverage of Coinbase’s pre-IPO perpetual futures described the firm’s push to combine crypto, stocks, prediction markets and futures inside one account.

That wider product strategy gives users more ways to trade. It also raises questions about how trading apps present risk, especially when products look simple inside a mobile interface.

Armstrong says adults should choose Armstrong replied that he is “pro-freedom” and believes adults should be able to use their money as they choose, as long as they do not harm others. He also said there is no perfect line between investing and gambling.

Interesting — and I appreciate the take.

I think there’s a balance here.

I’m pro-freedom. Consenting adults should be able to do what they want with their own money, as long as they’re not harming others. I don’t want companies patronizing users or dictating what they can do…

— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) June 28, 2026 The Coinbase CEO added that buying early Bitcoin, Zcash or stocks could also be described as gambling by some people. His point was that risk depends on the product, the user and the context.

Still, Armstrong agreed with part of Zooko’s concern. He said it does not feel right to “aggressively promote high-risk products to unsophisticated users.”

He also said there is a difference between making a product available and making it the main focus of an app. That distinction now sits at the center of the debate.

Prediction markets face regulatory pressure Coinbase’s sports prediction markets page says the products are offered through Coinbase Financial Markets, a registered futures commission merchant. The page also warns that prediction contracts involve high risk and may lead to the loss of the full investment.

Sports event contracts remain a disputed area in the U.S. In related coverage, Kentucky sued Kalshi, Polymarket and partners tied to Coinbase, Robinhood and Webull, saying the products looked like sports wagering under state law.

The CFTC took the opposite view and argued that Kalshi and Polymarket fall under federal oversight as designated contract markets. The dispute now centers on whether sports contracts belong under federal derivatives rules or state gambling laws.

Former CFTC Chair Gary Gensler also weighed in through a court filing, saying sports prediction contracts do not qualify as swaps under U.S. derivatives law. That filing added another layer to the legal debate.

Coinbase weighs access and safety Armstrong suggested that Coinbase could use clearer disclosures, AI-based financial literacy tools and more personal app settings. He said users could choose whether to enable or disable certain product groups during onboarding.

That approach would let users decide what they see without removing access for everyone. It would also give Coinbase a way to answer concerns about younger or less experienced users seeing betting-style prompts.

The debate shows how fast crypto apps are changing. Platforms no longer offer only coins and tokens. Many now offer event contracts, derivatives and other products that behave more like financial bets.

For Coinbase, the issue is not only whether users can access these markets. The next question is how strongly the app should promote them and what safeguards should appear before users place trades.

Sun, 28/06/2026 - 10:45

Samson Mow dismisses technical analysis, pointing to a massive $58,000 limit order wall protecting Bitcoin from further drops.

Cover image via depositphotos.com Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

Bitcoin maximalist and Jan3 CEO Samson Mow stated that the local bearish trend has ended and that the current cycle has reached its bottom. In his view, the main protective barrier for the market now is a dense wall of limit orders at the $58,000 level.

The reason for Mow's optimism was the fact that, in the current cycle, Bitcoin updated its all-time high (ATH) 37 days before the halving, and the entrepreneur is convinced that this precedent completely breaks old market models. He emphasized that Bitcoin cycles have irreversibly accelerated, which means that calculations by analysts expecting market capitulation over the next four months are no longer relevant.

I find it incredibly interesting how some people are so certain that the bottom is coming in 4 months because "cycles." But we had an ATH 37 days before the halving, so it would seem even if you believe in cycles you should reason out the cycles accelerated. The bottom is in.

HOT Stories

— Samson Mow (@Excellion) June 28, 2026 Against this backdrop, the Jan3 CEO harshly criticized supporters of classical technical analysis, pointing to a logical contradiction in traders' behavior, saying that if charts really predicted the future perfectly, analysts should simply sell at the tops and passively wait for the bottom instead of drawing "endless lines." 

In his opinion, traditional chart analysis is now completely detached from reality.

How the $58,000 buy wall closed the window for Bitcoin bearsInstead of patterns, Mow named a massive block of buy-side liquidity as the real reason for the Bitcoin market's stabilization. According to him, it was the dense wall of limit orders at the $58,000 level that fully absorbed selling pressure and protected the market from a further collapse. 

Bitcoin price action in 2026, Source: TradingViewMow concluded that the successful buyback of this zone definitively formed a local bottom and closed the window of opportunity for investors who had been hoping to enter the asset at lower prices.

You Might Also Like

At the same time, Mow also commented on the current information attacks against major institutional players, agreeing with the view that criticism of Strategy is turning into a new version of "Tether FUD." As an argument, he referred to the latest financial results of USDT issuer Tether for the first quarter of 2026, where, according to the report, Tether's net profit reached $1.04 billion with total assets of $191.77 billion. 

In Mow's view, this proves the complete failure of attempts to destabilize the market through coordinated FUD.

Related articles

Strategy is roughly $12 billion underwater on its Bitcoin, its stock has fallen below its net asset value, and its STRC preferred shares have crashed to a record discount as a law firm opens a fraud probe. Michael Saylor says nothing is wrong. The machine that bought 847,000 Bitcoin is being tested like never before. Here is what is actually happening.

Summary

Strategy holds 847,363 Bitcoin, the largest corporate stockpile in the world, bought at an average cost near $75,650, leaving the position roughly $12 billion underwater with Bitcoin below $60,000. MSTR stock has fallen below $100 for the first time in about two years, trading at a discount to the Bitcoin it owns, which breaks the premium that powered its fundraising model. The sharpest stress is in STRC, Strategy’s preferred stock designed to trade near $100, which crashed to a record low near $74 as dividend obligations quadrupled to $1.2 billion and cash coverage collapsed from over seven years to about 14 months. A law firm has opened a securities-fraud investigation into Strategy and Saylor, and analysts including CryptoQuant have urged the company to stop buying Bitcoin and rebuild cash. Saylor says Strategy’s Bitcoin and cash exceed its debt by roughly $48 billion and points to surviving a worse 2022; the debate is whether this is a temporary confidence shock or a structural flaw in the model. For five years, Michael Saylor’s company had one move, and it worked beautifully: issue securities, buy Bitcoin, watch the stock rise, repeat.

Strategy, the firm formerly known as MicroStrategy, rode that flywheel to a stockpile of 847,363 Bitcoin, roughly 4% of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist and the largest corporate hoard on earth.

The mechanism depended on a simple condition: that Bitcoin kept climbing and that Strategy’s stock traded at a premium to the Bitcoin on its balance sheet, so the company could sell shares to buy more coins on favorable terms.

In June 2026 that condition broke.

Bitcoin slid below $60,000, dragging Strategy’s position roughly $12 billion below what it paid for its coins. Its stock, MSTR, fell under $100 for the first time in about two years and is now trading at a discount to the very Bitcoin it holds.

And the company’s preferred stock, a security called STRC that was engineered to sit near $100, crashed to a record low around $74.

On top of the financial squeeze, a law firm has opened a securities-fraud investigation into the company and Saylor himself.

The flywheel that defined a half-decade of relentless accumulation is, for the first time, visibly spinning in reverse.

The question this raises is the one now dividing the market: is Strategy facing a temporary loss of confidence that a Bitcoin recovery would erase, or is something structurally broken in the model itself?

The stakes are large, because Strategy controls about 4% of all Bitcoin, and any sign that its machine is failing reverberates across a market already fragile from the June sell-off.

This piece works through what is actually happening, without either the doom that some critics project or the serenity that Saylor performs.

It explains the three interlocking pieces that make up Strategy’s structure and why they are straining at once, the specific crisis in the STRC preferred stock, the fraud investigation and the criticism from analysts, Saylor’s defense and the case that the company is fine, the genuinely difficult choices the company now faces, and what would resolve the question in either direction.

The aim is a clear, grounded picture of a financial machine under its sharpest stress in years, and an honest assessment of whether it is bending or breaking.

The three legs of the machine To understand why Strategy is under pressure, you have to understand how its structure works, because the strain comes from three interdependent pieces leaning on one another and weakening at the same time.

The first leg is Bitcoin itself, the reserve asset, which Strategy holds in enormous quantity and treats as a permanent store of value that only grows over time.

The crucial feature of Bitcoin for this purpose is also its limitation: it produces no income. It pays no dividend and no interest, so while it can sit on the balance sheet appreciating, it generates none of the cash the company needs to meet its obligations.

That gap between a non-yielding reserve asset and cash obligations is the hinge on which the whole structure turns.

The second leg is MSTR, the common stock, which functions as the engine.

When MSTR trades above the value of the Bitcoin behind it, at a premium, Strategy can sell shares to buy more Bitcoin, and the premium makes that buying accretive, adding more Bitcoin per share than it dilutes.

This is the mechanics of the reversal that now matters. The same flywheel that works in a bull market starts to drag when the premium disappears.

The engine works in reverse when the premium disappears: raising $500 million at $500 a share takes 1 million shares, while raising the same amount at $50 takes 10 million shares.

That is the same cash for 10 times the dilution, which erodes the very reason to hold MSTR.

The third leg is STRC, the credit leg, a preferred stock with a stated value of $100 that pays a cash dividend, recently yielding around 11.5%.

STRC works only as long as investors trust that the dividend will keep coming, and Strategy can raise the rate to attract buyers when the price slips.

Each leg holds up the others. Bitcoin is the collateral story that supports the stock, the stock is the engine that funds the buying, and the preferred is the credit instrument that raises cash.

When all three weaken at once, as they have, the question shifts from how much Bitcoin Strategy owns to whether it has the dollars to keep its word.

That shift is the heart of the current crisis.

The STRC crisis The most acute stress is concentrated in STRC, and it is worth understanding in detail because it is where an abstract worry becomes a concrete problem.

STRC, formally a variable-rate perpetual preferred stock, was designed to trade near its $100 stated value, held there by a variable dividend mechanism that raises the payout to keep the price anchored.

Saylor has spent months explaining the structure publicly, framing STRC as part of Strategy’s broader Bitcoin-backed capital machine.

JUST IN: Michael Saylor explains Strategy’s STRC Preferred Stock on KevinWSH podcast. Breaks down product Peter Schiff calls a “Ponzi scheme” pic.twitter.com/EReAclQjdT

— crypto.news (@cryptodotnews) May 29, 2026 That design has failed under pressure.

STRC crashed to a record low, touching around $74 intraday before recovering somewhat, leaving it trading roughly a quarter below the par value it was engineered to hold.

A preferred stock trading that far below par is the market’s way of saying it demands far more yield before it will treat the instrument as sound, which is a vote of diminishing confidence in the dividend behind it.

The reason for that lost confidence is a squeeze coming from both directions at once.

As Strategy issued more and more STRC over the first half of 2026 to fund Bitcoin purchases, its annual dividend obligations ballooned from about $300 million at the start of the year to roughly $1.2 billion, a near fourfold increase in under six months.

At the same time, its cash reserves fell by 38% over the same period, drained in part by a $1.5 billion repurchase of convertible debt in May.

The result is a collapse in what analysts call dividend coverage, the measure of how long the company’s cash could keep funding the payouts: it fell from more than seven years to approximately 14 months.

A particularly unforgiving feature of STRC compounds the problem. Its dividends are cumulative, meaning any payment Strategy skips still has to be made up later.

So the company cannot simply switch the dividends off to conserve cash, and it is unlikely to suspend them anyway because doing so would shatter its credibility with the preferred holders it depends on.

CryptoQuant calculated that to restore a healthy 24 months of coverage and let STRC recover its peg, Strategy would need to rebuild its reserve to roughly $2.8 billion, against the roughly $1.4 billion it holds.

That is why CryptoQuant’s warning that Strategy should pause Bitcoin purchases and rebuild cash matters. The issue is not just the price of STRC; it is whether the cash behind the whole preferred-stock structure is thick enough to survive a prolonged Bitcoin drawdown.

STRC, in short, is the leg that is visibly cracking, and it is cracking because the cash behind its promises is running thinner while the promises themselves have multiplied.

The fraud probe and the analyst warnings The financial squeeze has now drawn legal and analytical fire, which has intensified the pressure and the scrutiny.

A plaintiff law firm announced a securities-fraud investigation into Strategy and Michael Saylor, soliciting investors who bought the company’s securities and incurred losses, and saying it is examining whether the company may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public.

The probe covers all five of Strategy’s publicly traded securities, the common stock and four series of preferred.

It is important to be precise about the status of this: an investigation announcement of this kind is common in volatile sectors, no class action has actually been filed, the allegations are unproven, and Strategy has not publicly responded.

It does not establish wrongdoing.

But it adds a layer of legal uncertainty and reputational pressure at the worst possible moment, and it has fed the narrative that something is wrong.

That narrative intensified because prominent critics have also tied the decline in MSTR and STRC to broader Bitcoin weakness, arguing that Strategy’s structure is no longer a harmless side story but a market stress point.

The analytical warnings have been sharper and more substantive than the legal noise.

CryptoQuant published a detailed report urging Strategy to stop buying Bitcoin and rebuild its cash position before resuming accumulation, laying out the collapse in dividend coverage and noting that the company sits on a large unrealized loss with every Bitcoin bought in 2024, 2025, and 2026 now underwater.

Its chief executive argued that a forced Bitcoin sale at current prices would crystallize those losses and destroy shareholder value.

He also separately observed that Strategy’s relentless buying had begun to look more like a liquidity sink than a price catalyst, absorbing capital without moving Bitcoin’s price upward.

Another firm suggested Strategy might eventually need to sell $3 billion to $4 billion of Bitcoin to ease the pressure on its capital structure, though it assigned that outcome only a modest probability and saw continued small stock sales as the likelier path.

Not all of the analysis was bearish. One firm rejected comparisons between STRC and the collapsed Terra stablecoin, arguing the funding engine had become less efficient rather than broken.

But the weight of the commentary converged on a single uncomfortable message: Strategy has overextended itself by buying too aggressively while its cash thinned, and the model needs to change, at least temporarily, to stabilize.

Saylor’s defense Michael Saylor’s response to all of this has been characteristically defiant, and his arguments deserve a fair hearing because they are not without merit.

His central rebuttal, made in a public post, is one of scale: Strategy’s Bitcoin and cash reserves exceed its outstanding debt by roughly $48 billion, a cushion so large that talk of insolvency or forced selling, in his framing, misunderstands the company’s actual financial position.

He has emphasized that Strategy has raised more than $60 billion in additional capital since 2022 and invested it in Bitcoin, building the largest corporate stockpile in the world.

He points to that track record as evidence of a model that works through cycles rather than one on the verge of collapse.

His most pointed argument is historical.

Saylor has reminded the market that Strategy faced a far worse situation in the 2022 bear market, when Bitcoin fell below $16,000 and the company’s debt actually exceeded the combined value of its Bitcoin and cash reserves, with the stock falling roughly from the mid-$20s to the low teens on a split-adjusted basis.

Strategy survived that, he notes, by staying focused and continuing to execute its strategy, and went on to raise tens of billions more and add hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin.

The implication is clear: the company has been underwater before, in a deeper hole than today’s, and not only survived but expanded dramatically once Bitcoin recovered.

That makes the current stress, in Saylor’s framing, a familiar test rather than an existential threat.

Defenders have echoed and extended this case, with some arguing that Bitcoin’s market value cannot be pinned on any single individual and dismissing the comparisons between Strategy and collapsed crypto projects.

Others have praised STRC as a genuinely innovative instrument that strips volatility from Bitcoin exposure and could serve an enormous market.

Notably, Saylor has not publicly addressed the fraud investigation or the CryptoQuant warning directly, choosing instead to make the broad case for the company’s strength.

His defense, in essence, is that the fundamentals dwarf the fears, that the company has weathered worse, and that the panic reflects a temporary loss of confidence instead of a real flaw.

The hard choices Whatever the rhetoric on either side, Strategy now faces a set of truly difficult choices, and laying them out shows why the situation is more than a passing scare even if it is not a collapse.

The company needs cash to fund STRC’s growing dividends and to rebuild the reserve that supports confidence in those dividends, and every available path to that cash carries a cost.

It can issue more common stock, but with MSTR trading below the value of its Bitcoin, doing so means heavy dilution that further erodes the reason to hold the stock, weakening the engine.

It can issue more preferred stock or raise STRC’s dividend rate to attract buyers, but more preferred means more dividend obligations and a higher rate deepens the cash drain, worsening the very problem it is trying to solve.

Each financing lever, in other words, tightens one part of the structure while loosening another.

That leaves the option the entire model was built to avoid: selling Bitcoin.

Selling would refill the reserve quickly and could even let Strategy buy back STRC below par, retiring a $100 claim for around $80, which on a spreadsheet is rational.

But it is precisely the move that would confirm the market’s deepest fear, because the whole proposition of the company is that its Bitcoin stack is permanent, a leveraged bet that never sells.

Strategy has already cracked that door open.

Earlier in June it sold 32 Bitcoin, a trivial amount against its holdings, to help fund preferred distributions, in what was its first net Bitcoin disposal since 2022.

The sale was tiny, but its symbolism was enormous, because it showed the treasury could become a funding source for the structure built on top of it, which reframes every future shortfall.

If a small sale was acceptable once, a larger one is no longer unthinkable, and selling near current levels would also turn paper losses into realized ones.

Strategy appears to have absorbed the warnings to some degree, slowing its Bitcoin buying sharply and routing fresh stock-raise proceeds into its cash reserve instead of into more Bitcoin.

That is a sensible defensive move, but it is also an admission that the relentless accumulation defining the company has had to pause.

That is a meaningful change in posture for a firm whose identity is built on never stopping.

Is the model breaking? So is Saylor’s model actually breaking, or merely being tested?

The honest answer is that it depends almost entirely on one variable the company does not control: the BTC price the model depends on.

Both the bull and bear readings are internally coherent.

The case that it is not breaking rests on Saylor’s strongest point: there is no immediate crisis.

Strategy is not required to sell Bitcoin, faces no margin call, and holds Bitcoin worth far more than its debt, with a cash reserve it has just moved to strengthen.

STRC holders cannot redeem their shares against the treasury, which removes the run-on-the-bank dynamic that destroys leveraged structures.

The company has survived a deeper hole before. And a Bitcoin recovery would reset the entire picture, lifting the value of the holdings, reviving the premium in MSTR, restoring confidence in STRC, and turning today’s stress into a footnote.

On this reading, the model is bending under a cyclical downturn, exactly as it is designed to, and will spring back when Bitcoin does.

The case that it is breaking, or at least structurally strained, is subtler and does not depend on imminent collapse.

It is that the model’s efficiency, not its solvency, is the real casualty.

The flywheel worked because of the premium and the perpetual buying, and both have been compromised: the premium has inverted into a discount, making new stock issuance dilutive instead of accretive, and the buying has had to pause.

Meanwhile the cost of maintaining the structure keeps rising, with dividend obligations that have quadrupled and a coverage cushion that has thinned to little more than a year.

That means the company must now spend real resources just to hold the structure together until Bitcoin recovers.

This is why how treasury firms are valued matters. A Bitcoin treasury company can look simple when its stock trades above NAV; it looks very different when the premium becomes a discount.

The deeper worry is reflexive: the cleanest fix for the cash problem, selling Bitcoin, is also the action that would most damage the premium and the narrative that the stack is permanent.

That leaves the company caught between a cash squeeze and an identity it cannot abandon without undermining itself.

In this reading, the machine does not break in a single dramatic event. It grinds less efficiently, costs more to run, and depends ever more heavily on a Bitcoin recovery that may or may not come on the needed timeline.

The truest synthesis is that Strategy is not facing insolvency but is facing the first serious test of whether its financing model can function when its core assumptions, a rising Bitcoin and a premium stock, both fail at once.

The answer will be written by Bitcoin’s price over the coming months.

Until then, the model is neither clearly broken nor clearly fine, but visibly, and for the first time in years, under genuine strain.

Frequently asked questions How much is Strategy underwater on its Bitcoin? Strategy holds 847,363 Bitcoin, bought for roughly $64 billion at an average cost near $75,650 per coin. With Bitcoin trading below $60,000, that position is underwater by approximately $12 billion, meaning the coins are worth that much less than the company paid. Every Bitcoin purchased in 2024, 2025, and 2026 is now below its purchase price. Importantly, this is an unrealized loss: it does not force Strategy to sell, does not trigger a margin call, and would only become a realized loss if the company actually sold coins at current prices. A Bitcoin recovery would reduce or erase it.

What is STRC and why is it crashing? STRC is Strategy’s variable-rate perpetual preferred stock, designed to trade near its $100 stated value, held there by a variable dividend mechanism, recently yielding around 11.5%. It crashed to a record low near $74, roughly a quarter below par, because confidence in the dividend behind it has weakened. As Strategy issued more STRC to fund Bitcoin buying, its annual dividend obligations quadrupled to about $1.2 billion while its cash reserves fell 38%, causing dividend coverage to collapse from over seven years to about 14 months. A preferred stock trading far below par signals the market demands much more yield before trusting the instrument.

Is Strategy going bankrupt or being forced to sell Bitcoin? Not imminently. Strategy holds Bitcoin worth far more than its debt, faces no margin call, is not required to sell, and recently moved to strengthen its cash reserve. Michael Saylor has said the company’s Bitcoin and cash exceed its debt by roughly $48 billion. STRC holders also cannot redeem their shares against the treasury, which removes the run-on-the-bank dynamic. The real pressure is not insolvency but the rising cost of maintaining the structure: funding growing dividends and rebuilding cash while its stock trades at a discount. Selling Bitcoin is one option the company has tested in tiny amounts, but it is not being forced into a large sale at this time.

What is the fraud investigation about? A plaintiff law firm announced a securities-fraud investigation into Strategy and Michael Saylor, examining whether the company may have issued materially misleading business information to investors, covering all five of its publicly traded securities. It is important to be precise: this is an investigation announcement, not a lawsuit. No class action has been filed, the allegations are unproven, and Strategy has not publicly responded. Announcements like this are common in volatile sectors and do not establish wrongdoing. However, it adds legal uncertainty and reputational pressure at a difficult moment, and it has been amplified by critics suggesting Saylor may have crossed marketing rules in how he promoted the preferred stock.

What does Michael Saylor say about all this? Saylor has been defiant, arguing the fears misunderstand the company’s position. His central points are that Strategy’s Bitcoin and cash exceed its debt by roughly $48 billion, that it has raised more than $60 billion since 2022 and built the largest corporate Bitcoin stockpile in the world, and that it survived a worse situation in the 2022 bear market. Back then, its debt briefly exceeded its Bitcoin and cash, but the company stayed focused and continued to execute. The implication is that the current stress is a familiar cyclical test instead of an existential threat. He has not directly addressed the fraud investigation or the analyst warnings, choosing instead to make the broad case for the company’s strength.

Is Saylor’s model actually breaking? It depends heavily on Bitcoin’s price, and both readings are coherent. The case that it is fine: there is no immediate crisis, no forced selling, Bitcoin worth far more than the debt, and a Bitcoin recovery would reset everything, so the model is bending under a downturn as designed. The case that it is strained: the model’s efficiency has been compromised because the stock premium that made buying accretive has become a discount, the buying has paused, and the cost of maintaining the structure keeps rising. The cleanest cash fix, selling Bitcoin, would also damage the permanent-stack narrative the company is built on. The honest verdict is that the model is not broken but is facing its first serious test of whether it works when both a rising Bitcoin and a premium stock fail at once.

This article is information, not investment advice. Financial figures, securities prices, the status of legal investigations, and company actions reflect reporting available as of June 28, 2026, and can change quickly. The securities-fraud investigation referenced is unproven and has not resulted in a filed lawsuit. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell MSTR, STRC, Bitcoin, or any security. Verify current details from primary sources and consider your own circumstances before making any decision.

TL;DR

Bitcoin slipped below the $60,000 area and continued defending the broader $59,000 to $60,000 support band. Bitcoin and Ethereum were both on track to finish Q2 in the red, creating pressure around quarterly market structure. Risk note: Do not call the move a confirmed bear market or use panic language around the support zone. For more details, visit the official Tradingview platform.

Bitcoin’s quarterly structure is weakening, but the immediate test is still the $59,000 to $60,000 zone Bitcoin Defends $59K Support as Q2 Closes With Rare Back-to-Back Loss is a timely crypto-market story because it gives readers a clear signal to watch without leaning on hype or unsupported price targets.

The important point is not just the headline number or technical level. It is the way that signal fits into the wider market: liquidity is thinner, Bitcoin direction is fragile, and traders are paying closer attention to flows, wallet activity, derivatives positioning, and official ecosystem updates.

What the verified setup shows Bitcoin slipped below the $60,000 area and continued defending the broader $59,000 to $60,000 support band. Bitcoin and Ethereum were both on track to finish Q2 in the red, creating pressure around quarterly market structure.

Back-to-back quarterly weakness in the first half of the year is uncommon enough to make the close worth watching.

That makes this a useful setup for readers who want to understand what is actually changing beneath the surface. It also helps separate measurable market data from the more speculative narratives that often appear during volatile weekends.

Why this matters for the market For Bitcoin quarterly loss, the signal matters because it offers a specific lens for the current market rather than a vague bullish or bearish call. In a weak or uncertain tape, traders tend to focus on the data points that can be checked directly: flows, wallet routes, support zones, funding, moving averages, official technical updates, or security disclosures.

This is especially important in the current environment. Bitcoin has been trading near important support, altcoins remain sensitive to broader risk appetite, and institutional or on-chain activity can quickly become part of the market narrative.

What traders should avoid assuming Do not call the move a confirmed bear market or use panic language around the support zone.

That caution matters because many of these signals can be misread. ETF outflows do not automatically mean permanent institutional retreat. Wallet transfers do not automatically mean selling. Technical support does not guarantee a bounce. Developer updates do not immediately translate into price action.

What to verify next The next validation path is: TradingView price charts plus Coinbase and Binance historical market data. This is the key step before treating the setup as anything more than a developing market or ecosystem signal.

Weekend rates can move sharply, so spot and quarterly figures should be checked live before upload.

This report is based on publicly available market data.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Bitcoin’s most polarizing governance battle of 2026 is heading toward a quiet defeat. BIP-110, the proposal designed to restrict non-financial data on Bitcoin’s blockchain, has mustered roughly 0.31% of total hashrate support as of late June, with major mining pools conspicuously absent from the signaling effort.

The mandatory signaling phase is projected to begin around block height 961,632, somewhere between August 7 and August 15. The proposal needs 55% of miners to signal support for an early lock-in. It currently has 0.31%.

What BIP-110 actually tries to do In technical terms, the proposal caps transaction output data at 34 bytes and restricts OP_RETURN usage to 83 bytes. It would make it significantly harder to embed images, tokens, and other non-monetary content directly on Bitcoin’s base layer.

The proposal was originally introduced as BIP-444 back in October 2025 before being formally reassigned. Its author, Dathon Ohm, designed it as a temporary measure, a one-year consensus soft fork that would essentially give Bitcoin a trial period of tighter restrictions on data usage.

Advertisement

Proponents argue that protocols like Ordinals and Runes have driven up transaction fees and placed unnecessary strain on node operators.

The numbers tell a bleak story Node support for BIP-110 sat at 2-3% in early 2026. That translated to roughly 583 out of approximately 24,481 nodes in January, with much of that support attributed to Bitcoin Knots software rather than deliberate ideological alignment.

Miner support is even thinner. The 0.31% hashrate figure translates to about 5 EH/s out of a total network hashrate of approximately 940 EH/s.

The first block signaling support for BIP-110 was mined by Ocean pool back in March 2026. Since then, no major mining pool has followed suit. Ocean, run by Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr, has long been an outlier in the mining world, known for filtering certain transaction types that larger pools process without hesitation.

Why the big pools aren’t biting Critics of the proposal have been vocal. Blockstream CEO Adam Back and well-known Bitcoin developer Jameson Lopp have both raised concerns about the risks involved. Their objections center on several points: the potential for a chain split if enforcement is inconsistent, reputational damage to Bitcoin from a contentious fork attempt, and the fundamental enforcement problem that only nodes running the new rules would actually uphold the restrictions.

Even if BIP-110 somehow activated, its restrictions would only apply to nodes that chose to enforce them. Miners and nodes that didn’t upgrade would continue processing the transactions BIP-110 seeks to block.

What this means for investors The near-certain failure of BIP-110 carries implications beyond the technical debate. For market participants, the immediate takeaway is that Ordinals, Runes, and similar protocols aren’t going anywhere. The economic incentives for miners to process these transactions remain intact, and the political will to restrict them doesn’t exist at the hashrate level where it matters.

Bitcoin’s upgrade mechanism requires overwhelming consensus. BIP-110’s failure to gain traction shows that even proposals with passionate grassroots support can stall completely if they don’t align with miner economics.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

M continues to drop hard, while VELVET has entered the top 100 alts after a 30%+ surge today.

Bitcoin’s price has remained relatively stable at around $60,000 over the weekend despite the new attacks in the Middle East and the broken ceasefire.

Most altcoins have marked minor losses on a 24-hour scale, while ZEC has dropped the most from the larger caps. AAVE has also slipped below $90 after a massive correction today.

BTC Stagnant Around $60K The primary cryptocurrency has a strong start to the business week by surging to $65,500 after it had recovered the $64,000 support over the weekend. However, that was short-lived, and the next several days were extremely painful. At first, the bears drove it south to under $62,400, before the next two leg downs brought multi-year lows.

The cryptocurrency plummeted on Wednesday to $59,000 as the FUD around Strategy kept increasing. After a dead-cat bounce to $62,000 on Thursday, BTC experienced another massive decline. This time, it plunged to $58,000, its lowest price since late 2024.

The bulls were finally able to reemerge at this point and didn’t allow another breakdown. Instead, BTC rebounded by a couple of grand and has remained at around $60,000 for most of the past 36 hours.

This calmness now is rather surprising, given what happened in the Middle East. The US and Iran started exchanging blows and blaming each other for breaking the ceasefire.

Bitcoin’s market capitalization stands above $1.2 trillion on CG, while its dominance over the alts has neared 56% once again.

BTCUSD June 28. Source: TradingView ZEC, M Drop Although the chart below will show that most altcoins are in the red today, their declines are rather negligible compared to what transpired during the week. Ethereum continues to stand inches below $1,600, XRP is at $1.05, SOL is above $70, and HYPE is at $63. BNB has dropped slightly more, while DOGE is down by over 2.3%.

ZEC has dumped the most from the larger-cap alts today, struggling at $385. AAVE has lost much of the traction from yesterday as it’s back below $90 now. M continues to dig new lows, as another 13% decline has pushed it to $0.68. In contrast, VELVET has risen by 30% and has entered the top 100 alts by market cap. PUMP follows suit with a 15% surge.

The total crypto market cap has lost around $20 billion daily and is below $2.160 trillion on CG.

Cryptocurrency Market Overview June 28. Source: QuantifyCrypto

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, has once again shared updates on Bitcoin Tracker, remarking, “We are gonna need more charts.” Per historical trends, MicroStrategy typically announces increases to its Bitcoin holdings the day after such statements.

Relevant content

Marc Andreessen: Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.2 Rivals Top U.S. Open Models, Large Language Model Capabilities Gradually Move Toward a Multipolar Competitive Landscape

According to monitoring by Beating, a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen noted that many AI practitioners and industry insiders consider Zhipu GLM-5.2 to be the first Chinese AI model that can match or even outperform open models from leading U.S. labs on most tasks, while also being balanced across multiple capability dimensions. This development carries "extremely critical timing significance" amid accelerating global AI competition, as large model capabilities are gradually shifting from being dominated by a small number of U.S. labs to a multipolar competitive landscape. Click the original link below to join Beating’s Feishu AI News Channel, which provides 24/7 uninterrupted monitoring of global AI hotspots and news.

12 minutes ago

Bank of America: Three key thresholds for US stocks to trigger a "full risk-off" this summer, with signals for these conditions already building up.

BofA Securities chief strategist Michael Hartnett outlined three thresholds for a "full risk-off" trigger this summer in his latest Fund Flow Report: the Mag7 ETF falling below $60, USD/JPY dropping below 110, and the yield curve inverting again. None of these conditions have been met yet, but related signals are building. U.S. stock funds posted a net outflow of $8.5 billion, the first such outflow since March, following a historic $119.2 billion net inflow. The divergence where hyperscale cloud providers continue to underperform chip stocks has pushed the sustainability of AI capital spending to the core of market debate: Apple’s MacBook price hikes and Microsoft’s Xbox price increases are both directly tied to rising memory costs. Rack memory prices at Vera Rubin have surged by 435% cumulatively, and Goldman Sachs forecasts AI capital spending could reach as high as $1.4 trillion by 2027. Hartnett’s core ongoing question is: How much further do cloud providers need to fall before the market starts pricing in capital spending cuts? U.S. equity funds have shifted ahead of the curve, with liquidity flowing out of tech giants and into cyclical assets including semiconductors, small-caps, housing, and REITs — a move the market interprets as a front-run bet on a policy shift toward "affordability". For asset classes, Hartnett believes gold remains highly valuable for allocation below $4,000, and going long on long-dated U.S. Treasuries is currently the most contrarian long-term trade. The U.S. dollar is only suitable for short-term holding rather than long-term allocation, while going long on emerging markets over the long term is his strategic stance. Since Fed Chair Waller took office on May 22, U.S. Treasuries have risen by 3.2% cumulatively, while stocks have fallen by 1.6%, with bonds outperforming significantly.

12 minutes ago

Bank of America: There are three key thresholds for US stocks to trigger a full-scale risk-off move this summer; none of the conditions have been triggered yet, but relevant signals are accumulating.

Bank of America Securities chief strategist Hartnett outlined three triggers for a "full risk-off" environment this summer in his latest Fund Flow Report: Mag7 ETF falling below $60, USD/JPY dropping below 110, and the yield curve inverting again. None of these conditions have been met yet, but signals are building. U.S. equity funds have posted a net outflow of $8.5 billion, the first such outflow since March, following a historic $119.2 billion net inflow. The divergence where hyperscale cloud providers continue to underperform chip stocks has put the sustainability of AI capital expenditure at the center of market debate: Apple’s MacBook price hikes and Microsoft’s Xbox price increases are both directly tied to rising memory costs. Vera Rubin rack memory prices have surged 435% cumulatively, and Goldman Sachs projects AI capital expenditure could reach as high as $1.4 trillion by 2027. Hartnett’s core ongoing question is: How much further do cloud providers need to fall before the market begins pricing in capital expenditure cuts? U.S. equity funds have already shifted ahead of time; liquidity flowing out of tech giants is pouring into cyclical assets like semiconductors, small-caps, housing, and REITs, a move the market interprets as a front-run bet on policy shifting toward "affordability." At the asset class level, Hartnett believes gold still holds strong allocation value below $4,000, and going long on long-dated U.S. Treasuries is the most contrarian long-term trade right now. The U.S. dollar is only suitable for short-term holding rather than long-term allocation, and his strategic view is to go long on emerging markets over the long term. Since Fed Chair Waller took office on May 22, U.S. Treasuries have risen 3.2% cumulatively, while stocks have fallen 1.6%, with bonds significantly outperforming.

12 minutes ago

Samsung Electro-Mechanics plans to sign a 500 billion won large order for AI server MLCCs, and will partner with Sumitomo Chemical to develop glass substrate business.

Samsung Electro-Mechanics is in final negotiations with a major U.S. tech firm over a supply contract for MLCCs (multi-layer ceramic capacitors) for AI servers. Worth around 500 billion won, the deal equals 10% of its component division’s annual revenue last year, making it an extremely large-scale order. Industry sources speculate the client is a leading player with significant clout in the data center sector. Each AI server requires 15,000 to 25,000 MLCCs—over 10 times the number used in a smartphone—with a unit price more than triple that of smartphone-grade MLCCs, earning the component the nickname "golden rice of the AI industry". Samsung Electro-Mechanics currently holds the No.2 position in the global MLCC market with a 20%+ share. The contract is expected to significantly boost its standing in the AI server MLCC market. Industry observers note the deal essentially secures quality validation from a global "big buyer", which will prompt other major tech firms to follow suit. Turning to its glass substrate business, Samsung Electro-Mechanics will formally sign a joint venture agreement with Japan’s Sumitomo Chemical this week. The two firms will invest a combined 500 billion won to set up a glass substrate JV, with Samsung holding a majority stake and contributing around 300 billion won. The JV will be based at the Pyeongtaek plant of Sumitomo Chemical’s South Korean subsidiary Dongwoo Fine-Chem, with production scheduled to launch in early next year. Glass substrates, which offer superior heat resistance to traditional plastic substrates and can accommodate more HBM (high-bandwidth memory) and GPUs, are hailed as "rule changers" for AI semiconductor packaging. Samsung Electro-Mechanics aims to lock in a high-quality supply chain in advance for mass production, while Sumitomo Chemical is using this partnership to enter the next-generation packaging materials market.

12 minutes ago

Crypto KOL Ansem has continued pumping his eponymous meme coin, with ANSEM’s market cap briefly surging past $78 million.

According to GMGN data, Solana ecosystem meme coin ANSEM briefly hit a market cap of over $78 million before pulling back to $74 million. It has seen a 356x price surge in 24 hours, with 24-hour trading volume reaching $49.4 million. Today, crypto KOL Ansem announced on social media that, due to Pump.fun’s refusal to distribute airdrops, he is issuing a “stimmy” (stimulus fund) to “the trenches” — a term referring to on-chain meme coin traders. As of press time, Ansem has been posting buy calls continuously to stoke community sentiment. BlockBeats reminds users: Most meme coins lack real-world use cases and are highly volatile; please protect your assets and avoid FOMO.

12 minutes ago

Serenity: Automotive and robotics supply chains are converging, positioning Germany’s Schaeffler – a key player in core components – for a pricing revaluation.

Serenity has released an analysis on whether automotive and robotics supply chains are converging, taking Germany’s Schaeffler (market cap ~€7.47 billion) as a key case study. Schaeffler has partnered with 45 humanoid robot firms, with its product portfolio covering core components including bearings, gearboxes, sensors/ECUs, actuators, and power electronics. The company estimates its products make up roughly 50% of a humanoid robot’s bill of materials, and targets 10% of the segment’s market share. However, Schaeffler’s 2030 robotics revenue forecast is only in the hundreds of millions of euros—far lower than Elon Musk’s optimistic outlook for the market. Serenity dubs this a typical "sandbagging forecast," a deliberate understatement. Serenity also highlighted other notable targets, such as Nabtesco (focused on joint reducers) and Sanhua Intelligent Controls, which supplies components for Tesla’s Optimus robot. On the investment front, Serenity argues these traditional auto parts firms are currently undervalued due to drag from their core automotive businesses, while humanoid robots and AI-powered vehicles will serve as key growth vectors. The chairman of TSMC recently also cited AI vehicles as a growth vector. But a critical prerequisite is the emergence of killer apps and leading downstream players—similar to ChatGPT or Anthropic—to truly drive the entire upstream supply chain ecosystem. Currently, robotics business accounts for only ~1% of these firms’ total revenue, so the market remains focused on immediate bottlenecks like memory chips and MLCCs in the short term. Serenity predicts that as humanoid robots evolve along different architectural routes, future "unexpected supply chain bottleneck surprises"—akin to HBM or MLCC—will emerge, bringing pricing power and revaluation opportunities for early-positioned companies. In terms of timing, post-2027 is likely to act as a clear catalyst.

12 minutes ago

Michael Saylor is doing the thing again. The Strategy executive chairman posted on X on June 28, sharing the company’s Bitcoin acquisition tracker alongside a single line: “We’re gonna need more charts.”

If you’ve been paying attention, you know what that means. It’s the same playbook Saylor has run all month, with similar teaser posts on June 7 and June 21 preceding formal disclosures of additional Bitcoin purchases.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, has built its entire corporate identity around one bet: Bitcoin goes up over the long run, and anyone who buys enough of it will be rewarded. The company is the largest public corporate holder of Bitcoin on the planet, having accumulated thousands of coins across multiple acquisition cycles funded primarily through equity and preferred stock offerings.

Advertisement

What makes this latest tease notable is the context surrounding it. At one point in June 2026, Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings were reportedly $11.7 billion underwater. Saylor has previously stated that the company is “not going to be selling” even in adverse scenarios, and has gone further by saying Strategy will continue buying Bitcoin “forever.”

How Strategy keeps buying The company doesn’t just dip into a corporate checking account when it wants more coins. It raises fresh capital through equity offerings and preferred stock sales, then deploys that capital into Bitcoin.

Recent transaction data illustrates the company’s approach. Small sales of 32 BTC were followed by substantially larger repurchases, a pattern that reinforces the idea that any selling is tactical and temporary, while the buying is structural and ongoing.

What this means for investors The $11.7 billion in unrealized losses is a number worth sitting with. Most companies that find themselves that deep underwater on an investment start talking about “strategic reviews” and “reassessing priorities.” Saylor is posting memes about needing more charts.

What to watch next is straightforward: the formal acquisition announcement that almost certainly follows this latest tease. If the pattern from June 7 and June 21 holds, a specific purchase disclosure should land within days.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Thursday was particularly positive days for the spot ETFs tracking Hyperliquid's token.

The evident divergence in how ETF investors behave toward the largest cryptocurrencies by market cap continues. The past week saw some record-setting withdrawals from the BTC funds, but those following HYPE and XRP have maintained their green dominance.

At the same time, the SOL funds have turned red after the previous week’s positive performance.

XRP and HYPE Still Dominate CryptoPotato reported last week that the spot ETFs tracking HYPE, XRP, and SOL defied the trend set by the two largest digital assets and attracted notable capital. The trend extended in the past week for two of those assets, and one day was particularly positive for the HYPE funds.

Data from SoSoValue reveals that Thursday stands out with just over $108 million in net inflows, making it by far the best single-day performance from the funds. With a lot more modest $1.46 million on Tuesday and $1.82 million on Friday, the week ended with $111.36 million in net inflows. It also set the record for the most significant weekly inflows, surpassing the previous of $72.38 million marked during the funds’ second week of existence.

The spot XRP ETFs also ended the week strongly, albeit nowhere near HYPE’s Thursday inflows. They attracted $15.63 million on Friday, building on the $5.31 million on Monday and $2.05 million on Wednesday. With Tuesday and Thursday being $0.00 days, the week ended with $23 million in net inflows, the best in a month and a half.

The cumulative total net flows have risen to another all-time high of $1.47 billion. Moreover, both XRP and HYPE ETFs have been on a green-only weekly streak for 8 and 7 consecutive weeks now, respectively.

SOL Joins BTC and ETH While the HYPE and XRP products have continued their impressive streak, SOL has fallen behind with a $3.8 million net outflow. Thus, the Solana ETFs have joined the two market leaders.

You may also like: Hyperliquid Responds After Appearing on Singapore’s Investor Alert List Bitcoin Didn’t Lose to Gold, the Rotation Story Is Wrong: Analyst Bitcoin Holds Key Price Floor Despite Weak Bullish Signals: Bitfinex Alpha The spot Bitcoin ETFs registered another massive withdrawal in the past week, with nearly $1.8 billion leaving the funds. This was their second-worst weekly performance in their 2.5-year history. The Ethereum funds were also in the red, with more than $273 million withdrawn.

Tags:

Table of contents

0.2. Key Takeaways0.4. Crypto Market Snapshot — June 28, 20260.6. Fear & Greed Index: 18 — Cycle Low Sentiment0.8. Bitcoin: Flat at $60,251, Tight MA Cluster Unresolved0.10. Ethereum: $1,579, Tightest MA Compression of the Cycle0.12. XRP: $1.05, Struggling to Hold Above $1.040.14. Solana: $71.66, Holding Gains From Friday's 6.71% Surge0.16. BNB: $556, Weakest Large-Cap on June 280.18. TRON: $0.3215, Only Top-8 Asset Green on Both 24h and 7d0.20. Hyperliquid: $62.89, Quietly Holding Despite Market Pressure0.22. Dogecoin: $0.07401, Worst Weekly Performer in Top 100.24. Macro Context: What Drives the Week Ahead0.26. Today's Market in One Paragraph Bitcoin is trading at $60,251 on June 28, 2026 — effectively flat on the day at 0% change — as the crypto market enters weekend trading with no directional momentum and the Fear & Greed Index falling to 18 (Extreme Fear), its lowest reading since the current correction began. Total crypto market cap holds near $2.1 trillion. Volume across the board is sharply lower: BTC volume dropped 52%, ETH volume fell 45%, SOL volume fell 51% — a pattern consistent with low-conviction weekend consolidation after last week’s high-volatility sessions.

Key Takeaways Bitcoin flat at $60,251 on June 28; total market cap ~$2.1T; Fear & Greed Index at 18 — cycle low reading ETH $1,579 (+0.08%), XRP $1.05 (–0.14%), SOL $71.66 (–0.01%), BNB $556 (–1.32%), TRX $0.3215 (+0.27%) Volume collapse across all assets: BTC –52%, ETH –45%, SOL –51% — weekend low-conviction consolidation Fear & Greed dropped from 23 last week → 15 yesterday → 18 today; all four readings Extreme Fear CLARITY Act Senate floor vote window narrows: August recess is the hard deadline; Polymarket at 48% American Reserve Modernization Act full text published — 20-year BTC lock-up confirmed TRX is the only top-8 asset in positive territory on both 24h and 7d basis — USDT settlement demand persists Crypto Market Snapshot — June 28, 2026 AssetPrice24h7dMarket CapVolume (24h)Bitcoin (BTC)$60,2510.00%–5.76%$1.2T$14.65BEthereum (ETH)$1,579+0.08%–8.47%$190.64B$5.93BTether (USDT)$0.9985+0.01%–0.03%$186.06B$36.92BBNB$556.32–1.32%–5.37%$74.98B$846.66MUSDC$0.99960.00%–0.03%$73.72B$4.87BXRP$1.05–0.22%–8.05%$65.47B$1.07BSolana (SOL)$71.66–0.01%–2.27%$41.61B$1.68BTRON (TRX)$0.3215+0.27%–1.69%$30.49B$467.04MHyperliquid (HYPE)$62.89+0.07%–7.39%$15.91B$324.93MDogecoin (DOGE)$0.07401–1.66%–10.81%$12.62B$452.07M Fear & Greed Index: 18 — Cycle Low Sentiment The Fear & Greed Index printed 18 on June 28 — the lowest reading of the current correction cycle. Yesterday’s reading was 15, the absolute bottom; last week it was 23; last month also 23. All four readings are in Extreme Fear territory, meaning crypto market sentiment has been in its worst zone for at least a full month without relief.

Historically, sustained Extreme Fear readings below 20 have appeared at or within days of major Bitcoin cycle bottoms. The 2022 bear market bottom was accompanied by a Fear & Greed reading of 6. The March 2020 COVID crash bottom saw a reading of 8. A reading of 15–18 does not guarantee a bottom — but it does signal that retail sentiment has been maximally compressed, and that the marginal seller is increasingly exhausted.

The context matters: BTC held $58,115 as its intraday low on June 26 and has not returned to that level across two subsequent sessions. A Fear & Greed reading of 18 with price holding above its recent low is a divergence — sentiment is making new lows while price holds. That divergence, if it persists, is historically one of the most reliable leading indicators of a sentiment reversal.

Bitcoin: Flat at $60,251, Tight MA Cluster Unresolved Bitcoin is trading at $60,251 on June 28 — effectively unchanged on the day — with the unresolved MA compression from Friday night still in play. MA(25), MA(7), and MA(99) remain stacked within $400 of each other above current price. Weekend volume at $14.65 billion (52% lower than yesterday) confirms this is consolidation, not distribution.

The $58,115 June 26 intraday low has now held across three consecutive sessions — a constructive technical development. Bitcoin’s 7-day performance of –5.76% reflects the June 26 capitulation day rather than the current trajectory. The week ahead — with the CLARITY Act Senate floor vote window narrowing before August recess and the American Reserve Modernization Act in committee — is the most important legislative week for BTC price in 2026.

Ethereum: $1,579, Tightest MA Compression of the Cycle Ethereum is trading at $1,579 on June 28, up just 0.08% — the quietest session since the June correction began. Volume at $5.93 billion is 45% lower than the prior session. ETH’s 7-day loss of –8.47% is the worst among the top-8 assets, reflecting the magnitude of the June 26 selloff to $1,512.

The MA compression on ETH mirrors Bitcoin: MA(25) at $1,584, MA(7) at $1,591, and MA(99) at $1,602 are all within $23 of each other. A weekend resolution above MA(99) at $1,602 would be the first bullish technical signal in two weeks. The structural demand picture remains intact: 32% of ETH supply is staked and illiquid, BitMine’s 5.67 million ETH (4.7% of supply) is now permanently embedded in Russell 1000 passive funds, and the Ethereum Foundation’s 40% spending cut has reduced treasury sell pressure.

XRP: $1.05, Struggling to Hold Above $1.04 XRP is at $1.05 on June 28, down 0.22% on the day and –8.05% on the week — the second-worst weekly performer after Ethereum among top assets. Volume at $1.07 billion is 45% below the prior session. The $1.00 psychological floor has been defended across three consecutive sessions following the $1.0092 intraday low on June 26, but the recovery momentum from Friday’s bounce to $1.0756 has faded.

XRP remains the asset most sensitive to CLARITY Act news among the top-10. With Senate passage odds at 48% on Polymarket and the August recess hard deadline approaching, each week without a Senate floor vote commitment represents time eroding the 2026 window. The fundamental case — XRPL’s $3.5 billion tokenized real-world asset base, $1.72 billion RLUSD market cap, Ripple Prime’s DTCC NSCC inclusion — remains structurally intact but has not yet translated into price performance.

Solana: $71.66, Holding Gains From Friday’s 6.71% Surge Solana is trading at $71.66 on June 28, essentially flat (–0.01%) after Friday’s 6.71% surge from the $64.04 cycle low. Volume at $1.68 billion is 51% lower than the prior session — typical weekend consolidation after a high-volume recovery day. The 7-day performance of –2.27% is the best among the top-8 non-stablecoin assets, confirming SOL led the recovery from the June 26 lows.

Price is holding above all three moving averages following Friday’s bullish MA alignment restoration. The $70.00 level — roughly where MA(25) sits — is the key support to defend on any weekend pullback. The 100-billion-transaction milestone crossed on June 26, and the Alpenglow upgrade targeting Q3 2026 mainnet remain the primary fundamental catalysts ahead.

BNB: $556, Weakest Large-Cap on June 28 BNB is the worst-performing top-8 asset on June 28, down 1.32% to $556.32 after the tight consolidation at $565 seen across the prior two sessions broke to the downside. Volume at $846 million is 31% lower. The 7-day loss of –5.37% places BNB in the middle of the large-cap pack.

The $540.60 cycle low established on June 26 remains the key structural reference. BNB’s Auto-Burn mechanism and BNB Chain’s stablecoin volume continue to provide fundamental support, but the June 28 session suggests the MA compression resolved to the downside — a return toward $550 is the next support zone to watch.

TRON: $0.3215, Only Top-8 Asset Green on Both 24h and 7d TRON is the standout performer on June 28: $0.3215, up 0.27% on the day and –1.69% on the week — the best 7-day performance of any non-stablecoin asset in the top 10 by a significant margin. The MiCA July 1 enforcement window is now open, and TRON-based USDT settlement volumes continue regardless of crypto market sentiment. TRX’s defensive outperformance through the entire June correction — holding above $0.3186 while BTC lost 10% and ETH lost 18% from their June highs — reflects the structural insulation of utility-driven demand.

Hyperliquid: $62.89, Quietly Holding Despite Market Pressure Hyperliquid (HYPE) at $62.89 is the 9th largest crypto by market cap at $15.91 billion — a position it has consolidated through the June correction. HYPE is down 7.39% on the week but holding above $60.00 psychological support. Hyperliquid’s on-chain perpetuals exchange has consistently posted record volume through 2026, making it the clearest example of a utility-driven DeFi asset with fundamental justification for its market cap position.

Dogecoin: $0.07401, Worst Weekly Performer in Top 10 Dogecoin is down 10.81% on the week and 1.66% on the day to $0.07401 — the worst 7-day performer in the top 10. DOGE has no utility catalyst or fundamental support comparable to other large-cap assets, making it the most sensitive to pure sentiment deterioration. A Fear & Greed reading of 18 (Extreme Fear) is the worst possible environment for meme assets.

Macro Context: What Drives the Week Ahead Three catalysts define the week of June 28 for crypto markets:

CLARITY Act floor vote timing. The August recess hard deadline means every week of June and July without a confirmed Senate floor vote date erodes the probability window. A Majority Leader floor scheduling announcement would immediately move CLARITY Act odds on Polymarket and cascade through BTC, ETH, XRP, and SOL simultaneously.

American Reserve Modernization Act. The full text of H.R. 8957 — with its 20-year BTC lock-up and proof-of-reserve mandates — is in committee. Any advancement to a floor vote would be the most significant Bitcoin-specific legislative event of the cycle.

Fed speakers and PCE data. With PCE at 3.6% and nine FOMC officials projecting a rate hike, any Fed speaker comments softening the hawkish stance would be the most powerful macro catalyst for a crypto recovery. The next PCE data release and FOMC minutes are the key data points to monitor.

Today’s Market in One Paragraph The crypto market on June 28, 2026 is defined by three words: low volume consolidation. Bitcoin flat at $60,251, Ethereum barely positive at $1,579, Solana holding Friday’s recovery gains, and TRON outperforming everything. The Fear & Greed Index at 18 is the deepest Extreme Fear reading of the cycle — but price has held the June 26 lows across three sessions, creating a sentiment-vs-price divergence that historically precedes recoveries. The week ahead is the most important legislative week of the year for crypto: CLARITY Act timing, the American Reserve Modernization Act, and any Fed pivot signals will determine whether the $58,115–$60,000 range becomes the base of a recovery or gives way to a deeper test of $55,000–$56,000.

Bitcoin briefly dipped below $60,000 during the final week of June before buyers stepped in, capping a turbulent seven days driven almost entirely by macroeconomic forces rather than anything crypto-native. As of the latest data, Bitcoin trades at $59,873, Ethereum at $1,564, XRP at $1.04, and Solana at $70.37.

What Drove the Selloff

Expectations of higher interest rates for longer, a stronger US dollar, continued ETF outflows, and broad deleveraging across derivatives markets combined to push the market lower. More than $1 billion in long liquidations amplified the move, a reminder of how leverage continues to magnify short-term price action.

Where Each Asset Landed

Bitcoin’s decline found buyers at levels historically associated with long-term accumulation zones, which Avinash Shekhar, Co-founder and CEO of Pi42, described as the more significant signal from the week. “What stands out is not the decline itself but where it found support,” he said in an interview with Coinpedia.

Ethereum underperformed the broader market, sliding 9.84% on the week to $1,564. XRP showed relative resilience, losing less ground than most major altcoins and ending the week at $1.04, supported by sustained institutional interest tied to spot ETF product growth. Solana held up comparatively well at $70.37, reflecting continued confidence in its ecosystem’s development activity. Dogecoin dropped but remained reactive, ending down 11.97% on the week at $0.073, consistent with its history of quick responses to sentiment shifts.

Capital Is Becoming Selective

Shekhar identified a broader structural shift in how money is moving through the market. “Capital is becoming increasingly selective,” he said. “Rather than moving uniformly across the market, investors are differentiating between assets based on liquidity, institutional participation and ecosystem fundamentals. This marks a notable shift from previous market cycles, where momentum alone often drove broad-based rallies.”

Bitcoin ETFs recorded $1.79 billion in weekly outflows, the second-largest weekly sell-off since their launch. Combined unrealised losses for Michael Saylor and Tom Lee reached $24.5 billion during the week, according to on-chain tracking.

What Comes Next

Shekhar said the next directional move for digital assets will likely be determined by institutional flow data, macroeconomic readings, and monetary policy signals. A recovery in ETF inflows, easing inflation, and improved global liquidity conditions could lay the foundation for renewed momentum. Until those conditions change, he expects markets to remain range-bound with heightened sensitivity to economic data.

“The broader picture, however, remains constructive,” Shekhar said. “Institutional adoption, blockchain infrastructure development and real-world use cases continue to expand despite near-term volatility. Periods of consolidation are increasingly becoming opportunities for stronger fundamentals to emerge.”

Story Ends Here

Trust with CoinPedia:CoinPedia has been delivering accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert panel of analysts and journalists, following strict Editorial Guidelines based on E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness). Every article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy guarantees unbiased evaluations when recommending exchanges, platforms, or tools. We strive to provide timely updates about everything crypto & blockchain, right from startups to industry majors.

Investment Disclaimer:All opinions and insights shared represent the author's own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication assumes responsibility for your financial choices.

Sponsored and Advertisements:Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Advertisements are marked clearly, and our editorial content remains entirely independent from our ad partners.

Read the Next News

F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun has added another 4,950 ETH to his holdings, bringing his total recent ETH purchases to 92,000 ETH.

According to Lookonchain's monitoring, Wang Chun, co-founder of F2Pool, has once again withdrawn 4,950 ETH from Binance, valued at approximately $7.74 million. Since May 26, Wang Chun's address has cumulatively withdrawn 91,945 ETH (worth around $159.9 million) and 973 WBTC (valued at about $60.72 million) from Binance.

12 minutes ago

Serenity: Google's computing power constraints may help explain Meta's large-scale signing of AI Neocloud, which is positive for AI data center capital expenditures.

Serenity’s report states that Google allegedly restricted Meta’s computing capacity in March 2026 due to tight computing power resources, a move that may explain why Meta signed a large-scale cooperation agreement with AI Neocloud service providers such as NBIS at the time, and also imposed certain limitations on the Gemini model’s capabilities. Serenity notes that Google’s CEO previously disclosed during an earnings call that insufficient computing power resources limited Google Cloud’s ability to take on more customer demand, with related order backlogs nearly doubling from the prior quarter. Serenity believes this situation further illustrates that computing power supply from hyperscalers remains far below market demand, and even these large cloud providers are unable to supplement each other’s resources. In the long run, this will continue to underpin the logic driving AI data center construction and capital expenditure expansion.

12 minutes ago

Samsung and SK Hynix to announce major investment plans on Monday.

According to The Korea Times, South Korea’s presidential office stated Sunday that Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix will unveil major investment plans at a meeting chaired by President Lee Jae-myung on Monday. The investments will be announced at a briefing held at Cheong Wa Dae at 2 p.m. KST (1 p.m. Beijing Time) Monday, as part of the government’s push to advance its "three mega projects" aimed at balanced regional development. A presidential spokesperson added that the initiative is jointly driven by the ministries of trade, science and technology, transport, and energy. Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong and SK Group Chairman Choi Tae-won will attend the event and participate in discussions with other attendees. Industry observers expect the two chipmakers to invest over 1,000 trillion won (approximately $650 billion) over the next decade, with potential plans to develop a semiconductor industrial cluster in the southwestern Honam region. Lee Jae-myung called the investment a "historic achievement" and a policy initiative that could transform South Korea’s fate during a Saturday address.

12 minutes ago

Israeli military says it killed several Hezbollah militants in southern Lebanon.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued a statement on the 28th, saying its troops killed several Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon on the 27th. The statement added that IDF forces spotted several Hezbollah fighters carrying rockets in the Nabatieh region of southern Lebanon that day, then launched an attack on them, killing the fighters and destroying their operational site. Separately, the IDF destroyed a Hezbollah rocket launcher in another strike. The statement noted that the incident site is adjacent to the "security zone" where IDF soldiers are carrying out missions, and the IDF will continue operations to "eliminate threats".

12 minutes ago

Bitcoin may record a historically rare decline over two consecutive quarters.

Bitcoin briefly dipped below $60,000 over the weekend, logging a roughly 7% decline in the past week. As the second quarter draws to a close, Bitcoin is on track to post a roughly 12% quarterly drop, following a 22% fall in the first quarter, which would mark a rare back-to-back quarterly loss in its history. Meanwhile, altcoins have generally seen steeper declines than Bitcoin: Ethereum fell around 9.5% in the past week, Dogecoin dropped 11.7%, HYPE slipped 10.6%, XRP declined 8.7%, Solana fell 3.5%, and TRON saw a roughly 1.5% drop. Analysts attribute the market’s ongoing pressure to multiple factors, including sustained capital flows into AI-driven semiconductor and memory chip sectors, persistent outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, the Federal Reserve’s hawkish stance, and the U.S. Dollar Index staying at high levels. The market will watch closely for ETF capital flows and demand improvements in the third quarter to judge whether the crypto market can shake off its weak performance in the first half of the year.

12 minutes ago

A trader’s bet on ANSEM delivered a 261x return, generating over $610,000 in unrealized profit on a $2,300 stake.

According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a trader with the address CxCTVj has generated roughly 261x returns trading ANSEM. Data shows the trader initially invested only $2,330 to purchase 14.2 million ANSEM tokens. They have since sold 4.2 million ANSEM, cashing out approximately $68,100, and currently hold 10 million ANSEM, worth around $548,800 at current prices. To date, the trader’s combined realized and unrealized profits total about $614,500, translating to an ROI of roughly 261 times.

12 minutes ago

Despite strong outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, Bitcoin managed to hold steady above the $60,000 mark on Saturday. In the last 24 hours, Bitcoin rose by 1.44 percent, trading around $60,260. Its daily trading volume reached $30.16 billion, while its market capitalization stood at $1.21 trillion. Controlling 58.1 percent of the total crypto market, Bitcoin continued to set the pace for the broader industry even amid ongoing selling pressure.

Weekly outflows from ETFs accelerateUS spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a staggering $1.79 billion net outflow last week. This figure ranks as one of the largest weekly withdrawals since these products launched in January 2024. The recent movement has also pushed the total 2026 US spot Bitcoin ETF flow back into negative territory.

These outflows impacted major issuers, including BlackRock’s IBIT fund. IBIT had earlier ranked among 2024’s fastest-growing ETFs thanks to robust inflows from institutional investors. As one of the world’s largest asset management companies, BlackRock brings significant influence to the global ETF market.

Analysts at Glassnode note that this current wave marks one of the lengthiest periods of outflow since spot Bitcoin ETFs began trading, explaining that most investors are now opting to reduce risk rather than buying more at lower levels.

Bloomberg data shows that about $4.5 billion has exited Bitcoin ETF products since the start of the year. This trend points to the scale of institutional selling pressure throughout 2026.

IndicatorDataBitcoin price$60,26024-hour changeUp 1.44%Weekly ETF net flow-$1.79 billion2026 total ETF outflowApproximately $4.5 billionUnderlying market weakness persistsLosses in Bitcoin ETFs have occurred against a backdrop of persistent weakness in the overall crypto market. Since the severe sell-off that began in October, digital assets have struggled to recover. The total market capitalization of all crypto assets has dropped to roughly $2 trillion, a steep fall from its pre-correction peak of over $4 trillion.

A slowdown in investor activity and a waning of institutional interest have made recovery even more difficult. Capital that might have flowed into the crypto sector instead moved toward artificial intelligence-oriented investments and prediction market platforms. This shift redirected funds that could have supported digital asset valuations.

Early investors see gains erasedThe latest wave of selling has hit those who entered Bitcoin ETFs during stronger periods particularly hard. According to Bespoke Investment Group, early investors were up nearly 30 percent by mid-2025. However, Bitcoin’s extended decline has wiped out much of those gains, leaving the average investor facing a loss approaching 40 percent.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs have emerged as a major channel of institutional demand since their approval. High-value outflows from these products may signal weakening professional investor confidence, which could create additional downside pressure on prices.

Still, ETF flows represent just one aspect of the market. Bitcoin has previously rebounded after periods of heavy institutional selling, especially when overall risk appetite improved or new sources of demand appeared.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

The pressure from short term Bitcoin investors has surged once again. In the past 24 hours, around 50,000 BTC were sent to exchanges at a loss, marking a significant movement in the market. At the same time, the total market value of short term holders dropped to $237.7 billion, its lowest point since October 2, 2024.

Losses deepen for short term investorsAccording to CryptoQuant analyst Amr Taha, as of June 26, the market value for short term Bitcoin investors fell to $237.7 billion. This measure tracks the value of BTC held by investors who bought within the last 155 days. The current data reveals that the market value for this group has slipped below their cost basis, meaning many recent buyers now find themselves at a paper loss.

The latest drop in short term investor market value stands out not as confirmation of a market bottom, but as a reflection of heightened stress in the market environment.

A similar weakness appeared during the correction of October 2024, when the subsequent reversal established a key bottom for Bitcoin. However, the latest data does not yet indicate a new low; instead, it underscores mounting selling pressure faced by short term investors.

BTC inflows to exchanges hit new highsExchange flows also point to increasing selling pressure. Roughly 50,000 BTC from short term holders was transferred to exchanges at a loss in 24 hours, the largest such move since June 4. Binance alone received approximately 9,500 BTC, the highest such level since June 3 under similar conditions.

This activity suggests that newer investors, who are more sensitive to price swings, are becoming increasingly active on the sell side amid declining prices.

IndicatorLevelComparisonBTC sent to exchanges at a loss50,000 BTCHighest since June 4BTC deposited to Binance9,500 BTCHighest since June 3Short term investor market value$237.7 billionLowest since October 2, 2024Long term holders continue accumulatingBy contrast, long term investors present a more constructive picture. On Thursday, accumulation addresses saw Bitcoin inflows hit a record 181,000 BTC, breaking the previous record of 94,700 BTC from February 2022. These are typically wallets with limited spending history, and the data suggests long term holders are absorbing the supply entering the market.

Glossary: Accumulation addresses refer to wallets that mostly hold incoming assets and rarely spend. An increase in inflows to these addresses, seen in on chain analysis, suggests a growing trend toward long term holding.

The Coinbase Premium Index has remained below zero for 40 consecutive days since May 15, indicating weak demand from professional investors.

Macro data and institutional appetite add market pressureMarket analyst Darkfost noted that institutional appetite for Bitcoin continues to soften. The persistent negativity of the Coinbase Premium Index, which tracks the price gap between Coinbase and Binance, highlights continued discounting on Coinbase—a sign that professional investors are selling more aggressively than retail holders.

Recent US macroeconomic data also reinforced a cautious market mood. Headline PCE inflation reached 4.1 percent, surpassing forecasts of 4.0 percent, while Core PCE rose to 3.4 percent against an expected 3.3 percent. GDP also came in above estimates at 2.1 percent. These figures have dampened hopes for an easing in monetary policy.

Asset manager Bitwise commented that last week’s Federal Reserve meeting only accelerated the central bank’s hawkish stance. The firm noted that policymakers have scaled back expectations for easing and raised the 2026 median federal funds rate forecast from 3.4 percent in March to 3.8 percent. Bitwise also reported continued outflows from crypto investment vehicles like spot ETFs.

Strategy has remained a focal point for the market, accumulating 174,300 BTC in 2026 alone. Bitwise data show that about 96,000 BTC of these purchases were financed by STRC preferred share issuance, with 77,500 BTC supported by MSTR common stock sales. According to CryptoQuant, STRC’s price dropped to $82.5 from its $100 nominal value—a 17.5 percent discount—during last week’s pre market session, sliding further toward $73. The company’s cash reserves have declined by 38 percent since early 2026. Following a $1.5 billion convertible bond buyback, annual dividend obligations jumped from $300 million to $1.2 billion, shortening the dividend coverage period from up to seven years to just 14 months.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Fidelity Digital Assets has pushed back against concerns that Bitcoin’s long-term security will deteriorate as mining rewards decline, arguing in a new research report that the network’s economic incentives remain sufficient to secure the blockchain over time.

The report, authored by Fidelity research analyst Daniel Gray, reiterated the view that Bitcoin’s security depends on more than block rewards. Transaction fees, market incentives and other economic forces continue to encourage miners to secure the network and make sustained attacks prohibitively expensive, it said.

The findings challenge a longstanding criticism that each quadrennial halving weakens Bitcoin’s security by reducing the issuance of new coins. Critics argue that declining block rewards could eventually erode miners’ incentives unless transaction fees grow enough to offset the shortfall.

The issue has become one of the most closely watched long-term questions surrounding Bitcoin (BTC), whose fixed supply schedule gradually reduces new issuance until block subsidies eventually disappear. Whether transaction fees and other incentives can sustain network security remains a central debate among developers and market participants.

Since April 20, 2024, Bitcoin miners have received a subsidy of 3.125 BTC for each block they mine, down from 6.25 BTC during the previous halving cycle. However, Gray argued that lower issuance has not translated into weaker incentives for miners because Bitcoin’s rising price has more than offset the decline in block rewards.

He pointed to the growth in average daily miner revenue, which increased from roughly $26,300 during Bitcoin’s first halving cycle to more than $40.2 million today. “Despite declining issuance, miner incentives — and by extension, network security — historically strengthened alongside Bitcoin's price,” Gray wrote.

Bitcoin’s average daily miner revenue has increased substantially across halving cycles. Source: Fidelity Digital Assets

Public Bitcoin miners face mounting financial pressureWhile Fidelity argues that Bitcoin’s long-term incentive structure remains intact, many publicly traded mining companies continue to face near-term financial pressure. Some industry analysts have described the current environment as one of the most challenging on record, citing lower mining rewards, rising costs and growing competition.

In response, several miners have diversified into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, leveraging existing power infrastructure and data center assets to meet growing demand for AI workloads rather than relying solely on Bitcoin mining.

A recent report by VanEck estimated that publicly traded miners could require up to $50 billion in additional capital to fully transition to AI infrastructure, underscoring the scale and cost of the shift.

Public miners face a large funding gap in realizing their AI ambitions. Source: Miner Weekly

“A Bitcoin mine can run with relatively simple buildings, modular infrastructure and ASIC fleets that tolerate fast curtailment,” Blocksbridge Consulting wrote in a recent Miner Weekly publication. “AI and HPC facilities require higher standards for uptime, cooling, electrical redundancy, networking and customer support.” 

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Participants in the digital asset sector were busy this week opining on Bitcoin, AI, stablecoins, and quantum resistance before heading off for the July 4 holiday (in the US).

Bitcoin “BTC’s negative premium on Coinbase has been widening — a sign that U.S. institutional buying remains tepid. Meanwhile, Strategy (STRC) briefly dipped below $84. No immediate blow-up risk, but the ‘what if they need to sell?’ overhang is real, and it’s keeping a lid on sentiment.

“On the technical side, BTC remains pinned under its daily 20- and 50-day moving averages, with short-term MAs bearishly stacked and diverging. The daily RSI sits near 40 — weak, but not yet oversold. Bollinger Bands are tilting slightly downward, with the middle band acting as strong resistance.
 
“With bulls struggling for follow-through and bears holding the momentum, BTC will likely continue grinding below resistance, probing for real demand on the downside.”
 
Key Levels:
Resistance: $64,650 / $66,900 / $69,800
Support: $63,500

– Bitfire Group

“Bitcoin dropping in price during its quadrennial bear market phase is the norm, not the exception. Layer in a risk-off move in the overbought chip sector, and it adds to the sell pressure from institutions.

“Retail sees the price going down, and many follow like sheep. The smart money looks at the charts and sees a buying opportunity. Nothing fundamental has changed with Bitcoin; it always has a year-long bear market after the bubble pops.”

– Michael Terpin

“The global tech stock selloff of the last 24 hours has coincided with another bout of de-risking out of digital assets and pushing up options prices. This indicates that investors are paying more for insurance against further potential downside price movements.

“We’ve seen this story several times over the past year alone. Fears over lofty AI valuations and concerns around AI spending have driven risk-off moves in US equities, and those risk-off moves have coincided with a selloff in BTC and crypto, which remain strongly correlated to the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100. 

“Seven-day at-the-money BTC implied volatility jumped from 35% to 42%, while the volatility premium for downside protection increased once more. The 25-delta put-call skew, a measure of the implied volatility of out-of-the-money calls relative to puts, has fallen from -3% last week to -10% yesterday. 

“We’ve seen OTM puts trade with higher implied volatility than calls for most of this year, unsurprising given how far BTC is from its all-time high. Even brief periods of spot recovery, for example, the May rally back towards $80K, have been unable to drive a meaningful skew back towards call options, further indicating investors’ risk aversion.

“Beyond the recent tech selloff, our data has revealed an interesting trend in volatility and options markets over the first half of 2026, namely the compression in the ETH/ BTC at-the-money implied volatility ratio. 

“Last year, that ratio increased to as much as 2.5, indicating that ETH seven-day options traded with an implied volatility 2.5x larger than similarly dated BTC options. In 2026, however, the ratio spent much of the year hovering between 1.3 and 1.4, driven partly by a compression in ETH volatility towards BTC volatility. One potential factor behind that compression could be the impact of institutional sellers of volatility.

“In a SEC filing covering the period ending Feb. 28, Bitmine, the largest digital asset treasury firm for ETH, announced that the ‘Company began entering into ETH-denominated option contracts, primarily through the sale of put options.’”

“Additionally, there are a number of covered-call style ETH ETFs available, including Grayscale’s ETCO, Global X’s EHCC ETF and Amplify ETFs EHY. We’ve speculated in the past that the structural selling of volatility by digital asset treasuries had been one factor contributing to the oversupply of volatility in BTC options markets, and we could now be seeing something similar in ETH options.”

– Thahbib Rahman, research analyst at Block Scholes

Quantum resilience The US Quantum Resilience Clock just became operational

“The attack will begin quietly, inside traffic that was stolen years earlier and stored in a government warehouse, a hostile intelligence archive, or a private server farm no one was supposed to know existed. The files will look useless at first: encrypted diplomatic cables, defence communications, financial records, source code, identity data, and authentication logs.

“Then, one day, the machines will catch up. What could not be read yesterday will become readable tomorrow. That is the premise behind ‘harvest now, decrypt later,’ and it is why Executive Order 14409, ‘Securing the Nation Against Advanced Cryptographic Attacks,’ matters.

“For years, post-quantum cryptography was treated as a technical issue for standards bodies and cybersecurity teams. Important, but not yet urgent.

“That changed when the United States put dates on the board. Federal high-value assets and high-impact systems must move to post-quantum key establishment by Dec. 31, 2030, and post-quantum digital signatures by Dec. 31, 2031. Federal contractors and suppliers supporting federal systems are increasingly drawn into the same operating environment, with NIST-aligned quantum-resilience expectations likely to influence procurement and compliance requirements well before the deadlines arrive.

“Washington is not moving alone. Australia is telling organizations to stop relying on traditional asymmetric cryptography by the end of 2030. Canada is targeting 2031 for high-priority federal systems and 2035 for the rest of its non-classified government systems.

“The United Kingdom wants discovery and planning finished by 2028, priority migrations completed by 2031, and full migration by 2035. The European Union is coordinating member-state transition plans. France, Germany, and Japan are moving on their own tracks. Different capitals, different bureaucracies, same conclusion: the old cryptographic perimeter is running out of time.

‘The private sector has read the intelligence, too. Google has set its own internal target to migrate systems to post-quantum cryptography by 2029. That is not a symbolic date. At Google’s scale, a cryptographic migration is not a software patch; it is a global logistics operation.

“Ethereum is also preparing for the same threat from a different battlefield. Its quantum-resistance roadmap points toward full post-quantum protection by 2029, including changes to the signatures and cryptographic foundations that secure accounts, consensus, and the network itself.

“One is a hyperscale technology company. The other is a decentralized financial and computing ecosystem. Both are moving before the decade is out. But while a centralized giant can mandate a patch from the top down, a decentralized network faces a massive logistical bottleneck: upgrading immutable infrastructure without fracturing the network.

“The challenge extends beyond replacing one algorithm with another. Cryptographic standards will continue to evolve. New vulnerabilities will emerge. Regulatory requirements will diverge across jurisdictions.

“The organizations best positioned for this transition will not simply deploy post-quantum cryptography. They will build the ability to adapt as cryptography itself changes.

“That is the signal everyone else should be watching. The United States remains the world’s largest economy by nominal GDP and the anchor market for global technology procurement. When Washington sets a deadline, federal vendors hear it first. Then cloud providers hear it. Then banks, defence contractors, telecom networks, energy companies, software platforms, insurers, and capital markets hear it. The deadline does not stop at the federal firewall. It moves through the supply chain.

“The organizations that survive this transition will not be the ones that wait for quantum computers to arrive. They will be the ones who already know where their cryptography lives, which systems depend on it, which vendors can migrate, which certificates need replacement, which devices cannot be upgraded, and which contracts need to change.

“The hard part is not the math. The hard part is the inventory and the agility to act on it. Somewhere inside every enterprise is a forgotten protocol, an old appliance, a buried dependency, or a long-lived certificate that still assumes the future will look like the past. Executive Order 14409 is a warning that it will not.”

– Yoon Auh, founder of BOLTS Technologies

Bank of England’s stablecoin stance “The Bank of England’s decision to remove individual ownership caps and lower reserve requirements is a welcome step forward, but the £40B issuance limit suggests policymakers are still focused on the wrong risk.

“The framework assumes stablecoins primarily compete with domestic bank deposits, when much of the demand is driven by cross-border payments. Migrant workers in the UK send more than £9B abroad each year, often losing 6-8% of every transfer to correspondent banking fees and delays.

“A £40B cap on sterling stablecoins may sound generous, but it effectively keeps the infrastructure at pilot scale while dollar stablecoins issued elsewhere are already supporting real remittance flows.

“We operate under US state licensing through Anzens, where regulators focus on reserve quality, redemption rights and consumer protections rather than imposing artificial limits on growth. The UK now stands alone among major jurisdictions in capping stablecoin issuance in its own currency. That distinction will matter when payment networks and infrastructure providers decide where to invest and build.”

– Shantnoo Saxsena, founder and CEO of Encryptus

“The Bank of England’s reversal is less a change of heart than a recognition of reality: cap what people can hold, and sterling stablecoin activity just moves offshore into dollar coins. The US moved first with the GENIUS Act, the EU with MiCA, both ahead of the UK, and Britain couldn’t afford to regulate itself out of its own market.

“What matters is how they softened it. They scrapped individual holding limits but kept 24-hour redemption, reserve-quality rules, and licensed intermediaries, swapping a cap on users for a cap on issuance (albeit a high one). That’s the right instinct: regulate the rails, not the customer. Manage systemic risk through reserves and redemption, not by throttling adoption.

“So yes, a turning point in intent. But with rules final only by the end of 2026 and launches in 2027, the UK is course-correcting from behind, not leading.”

– Bernardo Brites, CEO of Trace

AI IPOs

“Everyone is focused on whether OpenAI or Anthropic reaches the public markets first, but that assumes the future of AI will be decided by model providers. Whether that’s the right assumption is up for debate.

“If you look at how enterprise technology markets typically evolve, the companies that create the most value are not always the ones building the underlying technology. They’re often the ones that make that technology usable, accessible, and embedded in everyday workflows. Most businesses don’t buy AI because they want access to a model. They buy AI because they want to solve a problem.
 
“An IPO could be an important milestone for OpenAI or Anthropic, but it may also mark the point where the industry starts asking a different question. Not who has the smartest model, but who is actually capturing the value created by AI. Those may not end up being the same companies.”

– Bindesh Vijayan, co-founder and CTO of Myndlab

“Oracle is the first big name to write ‘AI’ into a federal filing as the reason 21,000 people lost their jobs. Read the filing again, though. They spent $1.8 billion on severance and $55 billion building data centers.

“AI didn’t fire those people. A capex bill did, and AI was the cleanest line to write next to the number. When a company needs cash for GPUs, the payroll is the lever, and ‘automation’ is the word that makes the lever look like progress instead of a cut.

“Some of those jobs are genuinely gone. People trained the systems that replaced them, and that part is real. But here’s what I keep coming back to. Once ‘AI did it’ becomes the accepted reason, every board gets permission to cut first and explain later, and nobody asks who could actually still do the work.

“The story flattens 21,000 people into one word. Talent doesn’t disappear when the headcount does. It scatters, and right now there’s no good way to see where it went.

“We watch this from the hiring side every day across the Bondex ecosystem, and the job descriptions are already moving. Roughly one in four roles posted across our network now asks for AI or machine learning skills, up from about one in five at the end of last year.

“The work isn’t vanishing. It’s being rewritten, and the people who can prove they do the new version are about to be the most contested talent on the market. The problem is that proof is exactly what the hiring system can’t deliver. A resume can claim anything, and now AI can generate that claim in 10 seconds.

“That’s the gap we’re building Bondex to close. When the layoff reason is a single word in a filing, the people behind that number need somewhere their actual work is verified and visible, so a recruiter or an AI agent can find them on proof instead of a polished PDF. AI is going to keep reshaping who gets hired. The least it can do is help the right people get found.”

– Ignacio Palomera, CEO of Bondex

Michael Saylor, the billionaire founder of Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), has lost billions of dollars for himself and his investors as the stock has continued its strong downward trend. 

After peaking at $543 in November 2024, it has dropped to $82 today, with its market capitalization falling from $128 billion to $28 billion today. According to Forbes, his net worth has dropped from over $7 billion to $3 billion. 

Saylor has weathered major challenges before, including in 2022, when Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) plunged below $16,000 as the Federal Reserve aggressively raised interest rates and FTX collapsed.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy is Facing Unprecedented ChallengesThe current challenge, however, is severe. Bitcoin continues its strong downward trend, moving from a record high of $126,300 to $60,000 today, and is at risk of further downside as ETF outflows rise. 

Technical analysis suggests that BTC will drop to $50k soon, leading to more unrealized losses since his average buying price was $64,000.

The company has also gained some major liabilities. Its total debt has jumped to over $8 billion. It has also launched several preferred stocks that have all moved below their par level. STRC dropped from $100 to $72.50, while the others like STRD, STRK, and STRF have all plunged. 

The ongoing price action is a sign that investors anticipate that Strategy will be forced to sell its Bitcoin to cover its obligations. Earlier this month, the company sold 32 Bitcoins for the first time in years. It will sell these coins at a loss since the current Bitcoin price is lower than its buying value. 

Also, as Peter Schiff warned, selling BTC will put pressure on the coin as we saw earlier this month, when it dropped below $60,000 after Strategy sold 32 coins.

History shows that Bitcoin has bounced back from bear markets several times. For example, it rebounded to a new record high last year after plunging following President Donald Trump’s tariff announcement. It also jumped from $15,800 in December 2022 to a record high of $126,200 late last year. 

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

PANews June 28 news, according to Cointelegraph, Fidelity research analyst Daniel Gray refuted concerns that declining Bitcoin mining rewards would lead to long-term security deterioration, and in his latest research report pointed out that the Bitcoin network’s economic incentive mechanism is sufficient to ensure the blockchain’s long-term security. In the report, Daniel Gray reiterated the view that Bitcoin’s security does not solely depend on block rewards. The report noted that transaction fees, market incentives and other economic factors continuously incentivize miners to maintain network security, making the cost of a sustained attack prohibitively high.

PANews June 28 news, according to CryptoBriefing, based on the "2026 Outlook Report" released by Fidelity Digital Assets, as of the end of 2025, the number of publicly listed companies holding at least 1,000 BTC increased from 22 at the end of 2024 to 49, collectively controlling close to 5% of the total Bitcoin supply. As of early June 2026, the number of publicly listed companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets grew further, with approximately 170 to 199 listed companies holding about 1.265 million BTC, accounting for roughly 6% of the total Bitcoin supply.

Analysis: Weak demand from U.S. institutions may keep Bitcoin under pressure and range-bound in the short term.

Bitfire Group stated in its latest market commentary that Bitcoin’s negative premium on Coinbase has continued to widen, signaling persistent weakness in U.S. institutional buying. Meanwhile, Strategy’s income preferred stock (ticker: STRC) briefly dipped below $84. Though there is no immediate liquidation risk, market concerns over whether the firm will need to sell Bitcoin continue to weigh on sentiment. From a technical perspective, Bitcoin remains trading below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages, with short-term MAs in a bearish alignment. The daily RSI stands at around 40—weak but not yet in oversold territory. The overall Bollinger Bands are sloping downward, with the middle band acting as strong resistance. Bitfire Group believes that with a lack of sustained bullish momentum and bears still holding the upper hand, Bitcoin will likely continue fluctuating below resistance levels in the short term, further testing actual buying demand on the downside. Key resistance levels are at $64,650, $66,900, and $69,800, while the main support level is at $63,500.

5 minutes ago

Chinese crypto figure Ma Ji sold 34 Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs recently to cover his positions, netting 326 ETH from the sale and incurring a loss of 399 ETH.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, renowned NFT collector Machi Big Brother recently allegedly sold Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs to fund his long ETH position on Hyperliquid. Data shows that over the past month, Machi has sold a total of 34 BAYC NFTs, raising 326 ETH (approximately $514,000), but incurring a total loss of 399 ETH (about $631,000). Bored Ape #6057 was his most loss-making transaction: the NFT was purchased four years ago for 76.84 ETH, and recently sold for only 7.65 ETH, representing a roughly 90% loss. Meanwhile, Machi’s long ETH position on Hyperliquid has been liquidated multiple times recently. Lookonchain noted that he was liquidated again approximately 3 hours ago, leaving his account balance at around $81,000.

5 minutes ago

Thailand has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of money laundering through illegal cryptocurrency mining.

Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of belonging to a criminal organization that allegedly uses illegal cryptocurrency mining to launder proceeds from fraud and online gambling. Wang, a former leader of the Thai-China Trade Association, is identified as a core figure in the involved Chinese investor group. Reuters’ 2023 investigative report, which centered on Wang, revealed that a U.S. blockchain analytics firm found fraud-related cryptocurrency wallets had sent millions of dollars to accounts under Wang’s name, while he actively cultivated ties with top Thai political and law enforcement officials at the time. A DSI spokesperson stated Wang was charged last November with theft and violations of the Computer Crime Act, adding that he is believed to have fled Thailand, and authorities are tracking his whereabouts in cooperation with international partners. Separately, Thai authorities have also issued arrest warrants for four unnamed Chinese nationals and four unnamed Myanmar nationals.

5 minutes ago

US-Iran conflict escalates for three consecutive days: Iran targets US military base in Kuwait with missiles and drones, Trump warns "Iran will cease to exist"

According to CNN, the situation has reversed sharply after the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal took effect, with military clashes breaking out for three consecutive days between the two sides, multiple Gulf countries drawn into the conflict, and the Strait of Hormuz facing renewed severe threats to navigation. In the latest development, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have struck U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and Bahrain with missiles and drones in retaliation for earlier U.S. airstrikes. Kuwaiti military confirmed its air defense systems are intercepting incoming targets, while Bahrain's Interior Ministry issued an alert urging residents to head to the nearest safe locations immediately. For the U.S. military, U.S. Central Command announced multiple rounds of strikes on Iran's missile and drone storage facilities, military surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense positions and mine-laying capabilities, citing Iran's "continuous attacks on merchant ships". Trump immediately issued the sternest warning on social media, saying that if Iran does not stop the attacks, the U.S. military will be forced to "complete the tasks already initiated by military means", and that "the Islamic Republic of Iran will cease to exist". Iran responded firmly, with the IRGC stating that the U.S. airstrikes violated the ceasefire deal and "will lead to a complete halt of all diplomatic processes". Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched a drone attack in southern Lebanon just one day after a framework agreement was reached between Israel and Lebanon, further complicating the regional situation. The preliminary agreement signed by the U.S. and Iran this month aimed at restoring navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is facing the risk of complete collapse amid the continuous clashes, and market concerns over oil prices, safe-haven assets and global energy supplies are rising sharply.

5 minutes ago

Whale "sat0shi777" is trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously, with total unrealized losses exceeding $3 million on a combined position worth $102 million.

According to EmberCN’s monitoring, on-chain whale address "sat0shi777" recently executed a rare operation of being trapped in both long and short positions simultaneously. On June 24, the whale opened a long position of 468 BTC at an average price of $62,729, with a position size of approximately $29.38 million. Shortly after, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, and the long position currently has an unrealized loss of around $1.86 million. Yesterday morning, amid a downtrend, the whale added to a short position of 47,500 ETH at an average price of $1,536, with a position size of roughly $72.94 million. However, ETH did not continue to decline afterward, and the short position currently shows an unrealized loss of about $1.23 million. The combined market value of the two positions is approximately $102.32 million, with a total unrealized loss of over $3.09 million, leaving the whale in the red on both long and short sides.

5 minutes ago

A new crypto address has increased its holdings by 1,350 BTC, valued at approximately $81.87 million.

According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a newly created wallet address bc1q4m has withdrawn 1,350 BTC from Binance, worth approximately $81.87 million at current prices.

5 minutes ago

Analysis: Weak demand from U.S. institutions may keep Bitcoin under pressure and range-bound in the short term.

Bitfire Group stated in its latest market commentary that Bitcoin’s negative premium on Coinbase has continued to widen, signaling persistent weakness in U.S. institutional buying. Meanwhile, Strategy’s income preferred stock (ticker: STRC) briefly dipped below $84. Though there is no immediate liquidation risk, market concerns over whether the firm will need to sell Bitcoin continue to weigh on sentiment. From a technical perspective, Bitcoin remains trading below its 20-day and 50-day moving averages, with short-term MAs in a bearish alignment. The daily RSI stands at around 40—weak but not yet in oversold territory. The overall Bollinger Bands are sloping downward, with the middle band acting as strong resistance. Bitfire Group believes that with a lack of sustained bullish momentum and bears still holding the upper hand, Bitcoin will likely continue fluctuating below resistance levels in the short term, further testing actual buying demand on the downside. Key resistance levels are at $64,650, $66,900, and $69,800, while the main support level is at $63,500.

5 minutes ago

Chinese crypto figure Ma Ji sold 34 Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs recently to cover his positions, netting 326 ETH from the sale and incurring a loss of 399 ETH.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, renowned NFT collector Machi Big Brother recently allegedly sold Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFTs to fund his long ETH position on Hyperliquid. Data shows that over the past month, Machi has sold a total of 34 BAYC NFTs, raising 326 ETH (approximately $514,000), but incurring a total loss of 399 ETH (about $631,000). Bored Ape #6057 was his most loss-making transaction: the NFT was purchased four years ago for 76.84 ETH, and recently sold for only 7.65 ETH, representing a roughly 90% loss. Meanwhile, Machi’s long ETH position on Hyperliquid has been liquidated multiple times recently. Lookonchain noted that he was liquidated again approximately 3 hours ago, leaving his account balance at around $81,000.

5 minutes ago

Thailand has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of money laundering through illegal cryptocurrency mining.

Thailand’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) has issued an arrest warrant for Chinese businessman Wang Yicheng, accusing him of belonging to a criminal organization that allegedly uses illegal cryptocurrency mining to launder proceeds from fraud and online gambling. Wang, a former leader of the Thai-China Trade Association, is identified as a core figure in the involved Chinese investor group. Reuters’ 2023 investigative report, which centered on Wang, revealed that a U.S. blockchain analytics firm found fraud-related cryptocurrency wallets had sent millions of dollars to accounts under Wang’s name, while he actively cultivated ties with top Thai political and law enforcement officials at the time. A DSI spokesperson stated Wang was charged last November with theft and violations of the Computer Crime Act, adding that he is believed to have fled Thailand, and authorities are tracking his whereabouts in cooperation with international partners. Separately, Thai authorities have also issued arrest warrants for four unnamed Chinese nationals and four unnamed Myanmar nationals.

5 minutes ago

US-Iran conflict escalates for three consecutive days: Iran targets US military base in Kuwait with missiles and drones, Trump warns "Iran will cease to exist"

According to CNN, the situation has reversed sharply after the U.S.-Iran ceasefire deal took effect, with military clashes breaking out for three consecutive days between the two sides, multiple Gulf countries drawn into the conflict, and the Strait of Hormuz facing renewed severe threats to navigation. In the latest development, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed to have struck U.S. military facilities in Kuwait and Bahrain with missiles and drones in retaliation for earlier U.S. airstrikes. Kuwaiti military confirmed its air defense systems are intercepting incoming targets, while Bahrain's Interior Ministry issued an alert urging residents to head to the nearest safe locations immediately. For the U.S. military, U.S. Central Command announced multiple rounds of strikes on Iran's missile and drone storage facilities, military surveillance infrastructure, communication systems, air defense positions and mine-laying capabilities, citing Iran's "continuous attacks on merchant ships". Trump immediately issued the sternest warning on social media, saying that if Iran does not stop the attacks, the U.S. military will be forced to "complete the tasks already initiated by military means", and that "the Islamic Republic of Iran will cease to exist". Iran responded firmly, with the IRGC stating that the U.S. airstrikes violated the ceasefire deal and "will lead to a complete halt of all diplomatic processes". Meanwhile, the Israeli military launched a drone attack in southern Lebanon just one day after a framework agreement was reached between Israel and Lebanon, further complicating the regional situation. The preliminary agreement signed by the U.S. and Iran this month aimed at restoring navigation in the Strait of Hormuz is facing the risk of complete collapse amid the continuous clashes, and market concerns over oil prices, safe-haven assets and global energy supplies are rising sharply.

5 minutes ago

A new crypto address has increased its holdings by 1,350 BTC, valued at approximately $81.87 million.

According to Lookonchain’s monitoring, a newly created wallet address bc1q4m has withdrawn 1,350 BTC from Binance, worth approximately $81.87 million at current prices.

5 minutes ago

Crypto stocks have fallen far more sharply than large-cap tech stocks: Coinbase and Circle have declined 69% and 72% respectively from their peaks, with Bitcoin briefly falling below $60,000, exacerbating bearish sentiment.

Amid a broad sell-off in tech stocks, crypto-related equities have seen particularly steep declines, with their divergence from the broader market continuing to widen. Coinbase (COIN) and Circle (CRCL) have fallen 69% and 72% respectively from their all-time highs, far outpacing the 48% to 57% pullbacks of major tech stocks including Oracle, Salesforce, Netflix, and Palantir. By comparison, the S&P 500 index has dropped just 3.5% from its recent peak. Fundamentally, Coinbase’s first-quarter results missed Wall Street estimates by a wide margin: revenue fell 21% quarter-over-quarter, posting a loss of $1.49 per share, while analysts had previously projected earnings of $0.27 per share. Bitcoin fell below $60,000 this week, down more than 54% from its October peak. Ethereum also dropped to around $1,500, roughly 69% lower than its record high last year, as market sentiment continues to deteriorate. In its mid-year outlook report, 21Shares cut its 2026 crypto market forecast, noting that digital asset price performance is significantly lagging behind the sector’s fundamentals. The firm pointed out that institutional adoption continues to deepen, with stablecoins, asset tokenization, and prediction markets all maintaining strong growth momentum, but Bitcoin’s four-year market cycle remains the dominant driver of price movements. The report also acknowledged a prior misjudgment: “Bitcoin’s cycle is evolving, but it has not broken,” retracting its earlier claim that the four-year cycle was obsolete. Analysts argue that the sharp pullback in crypto equities reflects a combination of three pressures: overall weakness in the digital asset market, uncertainty surrounding structural legislation for the U.S. crypto market, and the potential impact of AI technology on existing business models.

5 minutes ago

Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz has settled a renewed debate over XRP (XRP) origins, confirming that a precursor payment network concept predated Bitcoin (BTC) by five years, but that XRP itself did not.

Schwartz responded on X after a social post claimed XRP predated Bitcoin by decades. The post called XRP the oldest digital asset, a label Schwartz addressed directly, drawing a sharp line between an early concept and the coin Ripple manages today.

What Ryan Fugger Designed in 2004Ryan Fugger conceptualized a decentralized payment and settlement network around 2004. That placed his concept roughly five years before Satoshi Nakamoto published the Bitcoin white paper.

Schwartz confirmed the timeline on X but flagged a crucial omission. Fugger’s design included no decentralized assets. His system, later known as RipplePay, functioned as a trust-based credit network.

Users routed value through pre-existing trust relationships rather than a shared cryptographic ledger. There was no native token and no open asset that could be traded independently.

Schwartz addressed the distinction on X.

Ryan Fugger conceptualized a decentralized payment/settlement network (but without decentralized assets) around 2004, well before bitcoin.

— David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) June 26, 2026 However, that separation matters. Bitcoin introduced open bearer assets secured by proof of work. The XRP Ledger brought its own model for decentralized value transfer, but it arrived after Bitcoin, not before.

XRP Launched Three Years After BitcoinThe XRP Ledger went live in 2012, three years after Bitcoin’s genesis block was mined in January 2009. Jed McCaleb, Arthur Britto, and Schwartz built the protocol together before Ripple assumed stewardship.

That timeline directly dismantles the 1988 claim. Fugger’s concept may predate Bitcoin, but a concept is not a coin. The XRP Ledger and the XRP token both trace their launch to 2012.

The distinction carries weight beyond historical accuracy. Ripple’s CEO has also criticized Bitcoin’s corporate strategy, reflecting broader tensions between the two communities.

The debate reflects a pattern seen across the crypto industry. Origin stories often conflate an idea with its execution. Earlier this year, the Bitcoin CIA creation claim drew broad pushback through a similar dynamic.

XRP Holds Near $1 as Ripple Expands Into EuropeThe token recently tested the $1 psychological level amid a sharp slide from earlier highs. Some investors still treat the coin as a long-term inflation hedge, though analysts have found the math difficult to support at current prices.

XRP Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto MarketsSchwartz has stayed active in the community beyond the origins question. He recently discussed investing versus gambling in a post that generated its own round of debate among holders.

How far back XRP’s roots run may be less relevant than where Ripple is heading. The company recently obtained European MiCA approval via a Luxembourg license, broadening its regulatory footprint across the continent.