Live financial news intelligence

Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.

Latest market signal English
Coverage 130,498 Raw stories ingested 15,117 rewritten in CS_CZ • 0 to rewrite (last 2 days).
Agents 7 waiting Pipeline agents
  • FMP Stock News Fetch every minute 29s ago
  • FMP Forex News Fetch every 5 min 4m ago
  • CoinGecko News Fetch every 5 min 29s ago
  • FIO Stock News Fetch every 10 min 4m ago
  • Patria Stock News Fetch every 10 min 4m ago
  • Editorial rewrite Rewrite every minute 29s ago
  • Asset sync Assets every 1 hour 14m ago

Latest coverage

Market News Feed

Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.

View
Details Date Content Source
2026-07-20 21:05 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:12 26d ago
ZG and Z EQUITY ACTION REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Zillow Group (ZG, Z) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on August 10, 2026
Z Zillow
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Zillow To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired Class A or Class C Zillow common stock between February 11, 2025 and May 7, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 20, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Zillow Group, Inc. ("Zillow" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: ZG) (NASDAQ: Z) and reminds investors of the August 10, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Zillow's agreement with Redfin was not a "partnership," but rather an acquisition of Redfin's business; (2) as a result of the Redfin Agreement, Zillow faced a materially heightened risk of regulatory scrutiny and liability under federal antitrust laws; (3) upon the filing of an antitrust lawsuit, Zillow continued to downplay its legal exposure; and (4) as a result, Defendants' statements about Zillow's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Zillow's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Zillow class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/Z or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Zillow Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Zillow securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges Zillow misrepresented its agreement with Redfin as a partnership, understated antitrust and regulatory risks, and downplayed potential legal exposure, making statements about its business and prospects allegedly misleading.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or acquired Zillow Class A or Class C common stock (NASDAQ: Z) (NASDAQ: ZG) between February 11, 2025 and May 7, 2026 may be eligible to participate if they suffered losses related to the alleged misconduct.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff represents the interests of the proposed class and helps oversee the litigation. Investors seeking appointment must file a motion with the court by August 10, 2026. Investors can share in any recovery without serving as lead plaintiff.

What should investors do if they purchased Zillow stock during the Class Period?

Investors should review their transaction records, preserve relevant documents, and evaluate their legal options. Those who suffered losses may wish to consult counsel regarding participation in the lawsuit or seeking lead plaintiff status before the deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Zillow securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305841

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-20 21:05 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:42 26d ago
REGENERNON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (REGN) INVESTOR ALERT Investors With Large Losses in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Should Contact Bernstein Liebhard LLP To Discuss Their Rights
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
FMP Stock News
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bernstein Liebhard LLP announces that a shareholder has filed a securities class action lawsuit on behalf of investors (the “Class”) who purchased or acquired the common stock of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: REGN) between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026, inclusive.

What To Do Next:

Investors are encouraged to act promptly and submit a form at Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Class Action Lawsuit or contact Investor Relations Manager Peter Allocco at (212) 951-2030 or [email protected].

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the Class, you must file papers by September 14, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on other class members’ behalf in directing the litigation. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as lead plaintiff. If you choose to take no action, you may remain an absent class member.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.

About The Lawsuit:

The lawsuit alleges that defendants made materially false and misleading statements and omissions regarding the Company’s business operations, growth prospects, and financial stability. As a result of these alleged misrepresentations, Regeneron common stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period. When the truth was disclosed, investors allegedly suffered significant losses.

About Bernstein Liebhard:

Since 1993, Bernstein Liebhard LLP has recovered over $3.5 billion for its clients. In addition to representing individual investors, the Firm has been retained by some of the largest public and private pension funds in the country to monitor their assets and pursue litigation on their behalf. As a result of its success litigating hundreds of class actions, the Firm has been named to The National Law Journal’s “Plaintiffs’ Hot List” thirteen times and listed in The Legal 500 for sixteen consecutive years.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. © 2026 Bernstein Liebhard LLP. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Bernstein Liebhard LLP, 10 East 40th Street, New York, New York 10016, (212) 779-1414. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.

Contact Information:

Peter Allocco
Investor Relations Manager
Bernstein Liebhard LLP
https://www.bernlieb.com
(212) 951-2030
[email protected]
2026-07-20 21:05 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:04 26d ago
REGN EQUITY ACTION REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Regeneron Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on September 14, 2026
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Regeneron To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Regeneron between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 20, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (""Regeneron" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: REGN) and reminds investors of the September 14, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose the true state of Regeneron's Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo Study; notably, that its preliminary statistical assumptions were fundamentally flawed, that the active treatment arm was failing to achieve meaningful clinical differentiation over standard therapies, and that the trial would ultimately fail to reach statistical significance on its primary endpoint even without overperformance of the control arm.

On April 29, 2026, Defendants disclosed that the Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo Study had been altered, expanding the number of patients in the study eligible for "analysis of progression-free survival." On this news, Regeneron's stock price fell $45.41, or approximately 6.2%, to close at $686.36 per share on April 29, 2026.

On May 15, 2026, Regeneron issued a press release announcing that the "Phase 3 Trial of Fianlimab . . . did not reach statistical significance for the primary endpoint of improvement in progression-free survival (PFS)." On this news, Regeneron's stock price fell $68.57, or approximately 9.8%, to close at $629.68 per share on May 18, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Regeneron's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Regeneron class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/REGN or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Regeneron Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Regeneron securities fraud lawsuit about?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has filed a securities class action lawsuit against Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) on behalf of investors who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period. The lawsuit alleges that Regeneron and certain of its officers made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Phase III Fianlimab-Libtayo clinical study. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants concealed that the study's preliminary statistical assumptions were fundamentally flawed, that the active treatment arm was allegedly failing to achieve meaningful clinical differentiation over standard therapies, and that the trial would ultimately fail to reach statistical significance on its primary endpoint. The alleged fraud is said to have come to light through two disclosures: first, on April 29, 2026, when defendants announced an expansion of patients eligible for analysis of progression-free survival — causing Regeneron's stock to fall approximately 6.2% — and then on May 15, 2026, when Regeneron announced that the Phase III trial did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint, causing the stock to fall an additional approximately 9.8%.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) securities on the NASDAQ between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligibility to participate is not limited to those who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any investor who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period and suffered a loss may potentially share in any recovery obtained on behalf of the class. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the Class Period. Participation in the litigation does not require investors to take any active litigation role beyond filing a timely claim if a recovery is ultimately achieved.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including working with counsel to make key strategic decisions regarding the case. Any investor who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period and suffered losses may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff, but must do so no later than September 14, 2026, which is the court-established deadline for such motions. Courts generally appoint the movant with the largest financial interest in the relief sought who also satisfies the adequacy requirements of the applicable securities laws. Importantly, investors are not required to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in order to participate in or potentially share in any recovery that may result from this litigation. Those who do not seek lead plaintiff status may still submit a claim and may be eligible to receive a portion of any settlement or judgment obtained on behalf of the class.

What should investors do if they purchased Regeneron stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) securities between August 1, 2025 and May 15, 2026 are encouraged to promptly review their brokerage and trading records to confirm the timing and size of their purchases and any resulting losses. Investors should take steps to preserve all relevant documentation, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications relating to their Regeneron holdings, as such records may be material to any future claim. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is September 14, 2026, investors who wish to be considered for that role should act in advance of that date. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP to better understand their legal rights and options before the deadline passes. Retaining counsel or seeking lead plaintiff status is not required to participate in any potential class recovery, but timely action is advisable to preserve all available options.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Regeneron securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305844

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-20 21:05 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:00 26d ago
TSMC Beat, The Stock Fell Anyway: Here's What Got Priced In
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor
FMP Stock News
Original source text
HomeEarnings AnalysisTech 

SummaryTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company delivered a clean Q2 beat, surpassing revenue and margin guidance, and raised its full-year outlook.The market had the June number three days early and sold anyway. That told me this move was never about demand.A record capex guide, softer margin outlook, and a valuation near historical highs are pressuring the stock. The tech rout is also a factor.I’m monitoring Q3 margin execution, second-half capex and cash flow, and technical support near $390 before reconsidering my hold rating. BING-JHEN HONG/iStock Editorial via Getty Images

I generally like it when a company clears its own guidance and the Street's estimates in the same quarter, and last quarter Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) did both.

Revenue came in at

14.08K Followers

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

I am not a registered investment adviser, broker, dealer, or tax professional. This article, including any comments or replies I post, reflects my personal opinions only and is provided for informational and educational purposes. Nothing I write is investment, legal, tax, or financial advice, or a personalized recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or short any security. My views may change without notice. Nothing I write is tailored to any reader’s objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance, or portfolio. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Readers should conduct their own research and consult a qualified professional before making investment decisions.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
2026-07-20 21:04 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:38 26d ago
Tech Faces a Moment of Truth as Earnings Test the Rally
TXN Texas Instruments
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Tesla, Alphabet, IBM, Texas Instruments, and Intel headline a pivotal earnings week as weakening technical signals suggest the tech rally may need time to consolidate.
2026-07-20 21:04 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:26 26d ago
ServiceNow Is Down 51% as Wall Street Bets AI Will Gut Its Business. July 22 Will Show Who's Right.
NOW ServiceNow
FMP Stock News
Original source text
The market has spent 2026 betting that generative artificial intelligence (AI) will hollow out enterprise software, and few large companies wear that bet more visibly than ServiceNow (NOW +1.60%). Shares trade near $103 as of this writing, down about 51% from their 52-week high of $210.20.

The sell-off has come even as the company's reported growth has barely wobbled.

That sets up an unusually clean experiment. On Wednesday, July 22, after the market closes, ServiceNow reports second-quarter results. If the AI-disruption thesis is right, the damage should be starting to show up in the numbers by now. If it's wrong, the stock is trading at a steep discount for no good reason.

Here's what to watch.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

The bear case meets the reported numbers The fear weight on the stock is easy to peg: AI agents could let companies automate workflows themselves, eroding demand for the subscription software ServiceNow sells. The same worry has dragged down software stocks broadly this year. Salesforce, for instance, trades almost 40% below its own 52-week high.

So far, though, ServiceNow's results read like a rebuttal. First-quarter subscription revenue rose 22% year over year to $3.67 billion, or 19% on a constant-currency basis, beating the high end of management's guidance. That was an acceleration from 21% growth in the fourth quarter of 2025. Current remaining performance obligations (cRPO), which represent contract revenue the company expects to recognize over the next 12 months, climbed 22.5% year over year to $12.64 billion. And the company closed 16 deals over $5 million in net new annual contract value during the quarter, up nearly 80% from a year earlier.

Notably, AI looks more like the thing ServiceNow is selling than the thing killing it. The company said its customers with more than $1 million in annual contract value for Now Assist, its generative AI offering, grew more than 130% year over year in Q1.

Also worth noting: Total remaining performance obligations, which capture all of ServiceNow's contracted revenue including amounts beyond the next 12 months, rose 25% year over year to $27.7 billion, growing faster than the current portion.

Cash generation is holding up as well. First-quarter free cash flow was about $1.7 billion, translating to a 44% free cash flow margin.

If there's a soft spot, it's subtle. That 22.5% cRPO growth was modestly slower than the 25% pace ServiceNow posted in the fourth quarter of 2025, though currency explains much of the step-down (growth held at 21% in constant currency in both periods). Still, contracted revenue is where real demand erosion would show up first -- well before it reaches reported revenue -- which makes it the line bears are watching.

Today's Change

(

1.60

%) $

1.65

Current Price

$

104.89

The numbers to watch on Wednesday Management's own targets make the scorecard simple. Guidance calls for second-quarter subscription revenue of $3.815 billion to $3.82 billion, or about 22.5% year-over-year growth. For the full year, the company expects subscription revenue of $15.735 billion to $15.775 billion, up 22% to 22.5%.

Three numbers will tell the story. Subscription revenue against that guidance range. The cRPO growth rate, and specifically its ability to hold above 20%. And the full-year outlook, which management has raised once already this year.

The stakes come down to valuation. ServiceNow trades at about 24 times consensus earnings-per-share estimates for the next 12 months and about 7.5 times trailing sales.

For a company growing revenue north of 20% with a 44% free cash flow margin, that is arguably a price built on fear. Software businesses with this profile commanded far richer multiples before AI anxiety took over -- ServiceNow itself did.

Of course, the discount only looks irrational if the growth holds. A meaningful cRPO slowdown or a trimmed outlook on Wednesday would hand the bears their first real piece of evidence, and the growth stock could get hit hard from an already low base.

I believe the fear is running well ahead of the facts. Customers aren't behaving like a disruption is underway. They're signing bigger, longer contracts that include the company's AI products.

But nobody has to guess here. Wednesday's report will either show the forward metrics holding -- or it won't.

If I owned the stock, I'd hold it through the report. For anyone considering buying, however, be cautious. It's impossible to know what happens in the short-term.

If subscription growth and cRPO hold up and the outlook rises again, the AI-disruption discount will start to look less like foresight and more like fear. And a 51% markdown on a 20% grower likely won't stay unnoticed for long.
2026-07-20 21:03 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:36 26d ago
INTU EQUITY ACTION REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Intuit (INTU) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on September 8, 2026
INTU Intuit
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Intuit To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Intuit between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 20, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Intuit Inc. ("Intuit" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: INTU) and reminds investors of the September 8, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) they had overstated Intuit's competitive advantages and growth, as well as the overall strength and sustainability of its business model and operations; (2) in reality, Intuit was losing significant business in its tax-related business, particularly in its Turbo Tax business, as a result of, inter alia, increasing competitive and pricing pressures; (3) accordingly, Intuit's previously issued FY 2026 TurboTax revenue growth guidance was unreliable and/or unrealistic; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On May 20, 2026, Intuit released its fiscal Q3 2026 financial results, which included its 2026 tax season revenue. Intuit stated that it "did not have the overall tax season we expected" and that it "faced pressure among the most price-sensitive DIY filers." Intuit said that "[w]e [lost] on price," and revealed that the Company needed to evolve its business model by delivering the right lineup and price points to meet simple filers' needs at the low end. Intuit also announced that TurboTax online paying units were expected to grow by only 2% as total IRS filers were expected to decline by approximately 30 basis points, representing the "most significant industry-wide contraction since the post-COVID tax season."

On this news, Intuit's stock price fell $76.86 per share, or 20.02%, to close at $307.07 per share on May 21, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Intuit's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Intuit class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/INTU or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Intuit Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Intuit securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges Intuit misled investors by overstating TurboTax growth, competitive strength, and FY2026 guidance while failing to disclose increasing pricing and competitive pressures.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased Intuit (NASDAQ: INTU) securities between August 22, 2025 and May 20, 2026 may be eligible if they suffered losses.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff represents the proposed class. Eligible investors must file a motion with the court by September 8, 2026. Participation does not require serving as lead plaintiff.

What should investors do if they purchased Intuit stock during the Class Period?

Investors should review their transactions and consider consulting counsel regarding their legal rights, participation in the lawsuit, or seeking lead plaintiff status.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi has represented investors since 1995 and recovered hundreds of millions of dollars. The firm offers free evaluations of potential securities fraud claims.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Intuit securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305811

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-20 21:03 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:53 26d ago
Broadcom Stock Has Jumped Just 7% in 2026. This Move by Meta Platforms Could Supercharge the Stock in the Second Half
AVGO Broadcom
FMP Stock News
Original source text
With gains of just 7% so far this year, Broadcom (AVGO +1.90%) stock has been underperforming the broader semiconductor sector in 2026. The PHLX Semiconductor Sector, for comparison, has jumped 58% this year.

The stock's expensive valuation explains Broadcom's underperformance. After all, it is trading at 62 times trailing earnings. Of course, Broadcom delivered an impressive 54% year-over-year increase in its earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2026 (which ended May 3). However, there are companies with much faster earnings growth trading at lower multiples.

So, Broadcom needs to deliver significant acceleration in earnings growth to give its stock a shot in the arm. The good news for investors is that the next big catalyst for Broadcom stock could arrive soon, courtesy of Meta Platforms (META 0.06%).

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Meta Platforms is poised to go big on in-house artificial intelligence (AI) chips According to a Reuters report, Meta Platforms will reportedly start manufacturing an in-house AI chip, codenamed Iris, from September this year. An internal memo viewed by Reuters states that Meta aims to boost its AI data center capacity to 14 gigawatts (GW) by next year, with its Iris chips playing a central role in that expansion.

Today's Change

(

1.90

%) $

7.06

Current Price

$

377.88

What's more, Iris is reportedly set to be the first generation of the tech giant's in-house Meta Training and Inference Accelerators (MTIA), which the company relies on to power AI functions on Facebook and Instagram. Reuters adds that the testing of the chip has been completed successfully. This is great news for Broadcom, which is partnering with Meta on the MTIA program.

In April, Broadcom announced a "multi-year, multi-generation strategic partnership" with Meta to help the Magnificent Seven company design custom silicon to power its AI data centers. Broadcom was poised to deploy 1 gigawatt (GW) of computing capacity in the first phase of the partnership. However, it now appears that Broadcom could end up rolling out significantly more AI computing capacity with Meta.

It is worth noting that Meta Platforms has increased its 2026 capital expenditure guidance to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion from the prior range of $115 billion to $135 billion. Broadcom could benefit from this aggressive capital spending to support the rollout of Meta's AI data centers.

Broadcom can post stronger-than-expected growth in the second half When Broadcom released its fiscal Q2 results last month, it reported a 48% year-over-year increase in revenue to $22.2 billion. The company's fiscal Q3 revenue guidance of $29.4 billion points to a significantly stronger year-over-year increase of 84%. Even better, consensus estimates project a 94% year-over-year revenue jump in fiscal Q4.

However, don't be surprised to see Broadcom clocking bigger gains as key customers like Meta accelerate their AI infrastructure rollout. Moreover, Broadcom trades at just 20 times forward earnings, and its bottom-line growth is poised to remain solid in the future following an estimated jump of 70% this fiscal year to $11.62 per share.

Data by YCharts

Assuming Broadcom trades at even 30 times earnings at the end of fiscal 2028 and its earnings per share increase to $25.85, as shown in the chart above, its stock price will jump to $775. That's a potential jump of 107% from current levels, which is why investors should consider buying this AI stock before it steps on the gas in the second half of 2026.
2026-07-20 21:03 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:22 26d ago
Calls of the Day: Nvidia, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Uber and Charles Schwab
SCHW Charles Schwab
FMP Stock News
Original source text
The Investment Committee debate the latest Calls of the Day.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 12:03 26d ago
Zilliqa asks exchanges to pause ZIL transfers after suspected cold wallet theft
ZIL Zilliqa
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Zilliqa asks exchanges to pause ZIL transfers after suspected cold wallet theftZilliqa said exchanges paused ZIL deposits and withdrawals after an exchange partner’s cold wallet was compromised, with the amount stolen still undisclosed.

Zilliqa, a layer-1 blockchain network, said it is investigating a security incident involving an exchange partner after ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet.

In an X post on Monday, Zilliqa said it had asked exchanges to temporarily pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals as a precaution while it investigates the incident.

Zilliqa did not disclose the amount of ZIL stolen, identify the affected exchange partner or explain the possible cause of the incident. “We understand the community will have questions. We will share further updates as soon as we have verified information,” it said.

Zilliqa was launched in 2017 as a blockchain designed around sharding, a technology that splits transaction processing across multiple groups of nodes to improve scalability. The project was co-founded by researchers Amrit Kumar and Xinshu Dong, with the network’s mainnet going live in January 2019.

Zilliqa’s native token, ZIL, is used for transaction fees and smart contracts on the network. According to CoinGecko, ZIL was trading at around $0.0025 at the time of writing, down 7.1% over the past 24 hours.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 12:04 26d ago
COINTELEGRAPH: Zilliqa asks exchanges to pause ZIL transfers after suspected cold wallet theft
ZIL Zilliqa
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Zilliqa asks exchanges to pause ZIL transfers after suspected cold wallet theftZilliqa said exchanges paused ZIL deposits and withdrawals after an exchange partner’s cold wallet was compromised, with the amount stolen still undisclosed.

Zilliqa, a layer-1 blockchain network, said it is investigating a security incident involving an exchange partner after ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet.

In an X post on Monday, Zilliqa said it had asked exchanges to temporarily pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals as a precaution while it investigates the incident.

Zilliqa did not disclose the amount of ZIL stolen, identify the affected exchange partner or explain the possible cause of the incident. “We understand the community will have questions. We will share further updates as soon as we have verified information,” it said.

Zilliqa was launched in 2017 as a blockchain designed around sharding, a technology that splits transaction processing across multiple groups of nodes to improve scalability. The project was co-founded by researchers Amrit Kumar and Xinshu Dong, with the network’s mainnet going live in January 2019.

Zilliqa’s native token, ZIL, is used for transaction fees and smart contracts on the network. According to CoinGecko, ZIL was trading at around $0.0025 at the time of writing, down 7.1% over the past 24 hours.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 12:51 26d ago
Zilliqa halts ZIL transfers after exchange cold wallet theft
ZIL Zilliqa
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Zilliqa has asked cryptocurrency exchanges to temporarily suspend ZIL deposits and withdrawals after an exchange partner suffered a suspected cold wallet compromise.

Summary

Zilliqa asked exchanges to halt ZIL transfers after a partner’s cold wallet was reportedly compromised. The network has not disclosed the stolen amount, affected exchange, or suspected cause of theft. ZIL fell about 9% as transfer suspensions and unanswered questions weighed on short-term market sentiment. The layer-1 blockchain project said ZIL had been stolen from the affected wallet and that it had started investigating the incident with the unnamed partner. Zilliqa has not disclosed how many tokens were taken, their value or how the attacker gained access to the wallet.

“We understand the community will have questions. We will share further updates as soon as we have verified information,” Zilliqa said. 

The project also asked users to rely on its official channels while investigators establish what happened.

The announcement points to a compromise involving an exchange partner rather than a confirmed breach of the Zilliqa blockchain itself. However, the team has not yet released a technical review or identified the affected company, leaving the exact attack method unknown.

Exchanges pause ZIL deposits and withdrawals Zilliqa said it contacted exchanges and requested temporary restrictions on ZIL transfers as a precaution. The measure limits the ability to deposit or withdraw the token through participating trading platforms while the investigation continues.

We have been made aware of a security incident involving one of our exchange partners, in which ZIL was stolen from a cold wallet.

The incident is under active investigation, and we are working with the relevant parties to establish the root cause and full scope. As a…

— Zilliqa (@zilliqa) July 20, 2026 Bitget separately announced that it would suspend deposits and withdrawals on the Zilliqa network from July 20 at 18:15 UTC+8. The exchange cited “wallet maintenance” and said it would announce a reopening time later. Bitget did not publicly link its maintenance notice to the theft in the announcement.

The transfer restrictions do not stop the Zilliqa blockchain from processing transactions between onchain addresses. Instead, participating exchanges can prevent users from moving ZIL into or out of their platforms until they complete their own checks or receive further information.

Meanwhile, ZIL faced fresh selling pressure following the security announcement. CoinGecko data showed the token trading near $0.00254 at the time of writing, down about 9% over 24 hours. Market prices can change quickly while details about the incident remain limited.

Cold wallet compromise raises questions over the theft Cold wallets keep private keys away from constantly internet-connected systems and are widely used by exchanges to store larger crypto balances. However, cold storage does not remove every security risk. Problems involving signing devices, private-key access or internal operational controls can still expose assets.

A major example came in February 2025, when Bybit lost about $1.4 billion after attackers compromised a cold wallet transaction process. As crypto.news previously reported, the incident showed that attackers can target the systems and people involved in authorizing transactions even when assets sit in offline storage.

More recent security cases have also shifted attention toward wallet access and key management. Crypto.news reported in May that a roughly $520,000 incident connected to Polymarket activity was linked to a compromised private key used for an internal operations wallet rather than the platform’s core contracts.

Zilliqa has not said whether the latest theft involved a stolen private key, compromised signing system or another type of security failure. It has also not said whether the stolen ZIL has moved to other wallets or reached centralized exchanges.

Until investigators release wallet addresses or transaction records, the amount stolen and the movement of the funds cannot be independently assessed from Zilliqa’s public statement alone.

Zilliqa waits for verified findings before releasing details The latest incident comes after Zilliqa faced several technical problems in previous years, although those events involved network operations rather than a disclosed exchange wallet theft.

As previously reported by crypto.news, Zilliqa announced a permanent fix in September 2024 after a bug interrupted block production. The network had also dealt with other disruptions involving block generation and node synchronization during that period.

Those earlier technical problems have not been publicly connected to the current exchange partner incident. Zilliqa’s latest statement specifically describes the event as the theft of ZIL from a cold wallet controlled by a partner.

The project launched its mainnet in 2019 and became known for using sharding to divide transaction processing across groups of nodes. ZIL serves as the network’s native asset and is used for transaction fees and smart contract activity.

For now, the main unanswered questions concern the identity of the affected exchange, the amount of ZIL stolen and the method used to compromise the wallet. Zilliqa has not provided a timeline for completing its investigation or said when exchanges should restore normal transfers.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:08 26d ago
Security Crisis in Forgotten Altcoin! All Exchanges Called Upon to “Halt Trading”! Here Are the Details
ZIL Zilliqa
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Zilliqa (ZIL), one of the most popular altcoins during the previous bull run, announced that one of its exchange partners suffered a security breach and that ZIL assets held in a cold wallet were stolen.

The Layer 1 blockchain reported that a security incident involving ZIL and its exchange partner led to the theft of ZIL from a cold wallet, and that the investigation is ongoing.

With this announcement, the ZIL team requested that all exchanges temporarily suspend ZIL deposit and withdrawal transactions to prevent further damage and stop the movement of stolen funds through exchanges.

The company has not yet publicly disclosed the name of the exchange affected by the security breach or the amount of ZIL stolen. The team stated that the investigation is ongoing and that they are actively investigating the incident and coordinating with relevant parties to determine the cause and extent of the security breach.

Zilliqa stated that it will provide further updates as verified information becomes available and advised users to rely only on official Zilliqa channels for relevant information.

Previously, the South Korean exchange Bithumb had also temporarily suspended ZIL deposits and withdrawals due to suspected security concerns.

Although the price of ZIL dropped after the incident, it subsequently recovered.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:00 26d ago
Zilliqa Exchange Partner’s Cold Wallet Breach Triggers ZIL Deposit Freeze
ZIL Zilliqa
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Table of contents

A security incident at one of Zilliqa’s exchange partners has forced the network to ask all centralized platforms to halt ZIL deposits and withdrawals, freezing liquidity for the native token of one of the industry’s earliest sharding blockchains. The breach, first reported by WuBlockchain in the original report, targeted a cold wallet, raising immediate questions about how an offline storage system could be compromised.

The Zilliqa team confirmed that the stolen funds were ZIL tokens held in a partner exchange’s cold wallet, but neither the name of the exchange nor the precise amount taken has been disclosed. In a public statement, the project said it is working with the affected party and other stakeholders to determine the root cause and full scope of the loss. The decision to temporarily pause all centralized exchange deposits and withdrawals is a containment measure, aimed at preventing the attacker from moving or selling the stolen assets through regulated order books.

A Confirmed Breach, Few Details The absence of key details means traders and liquidity providers are operating in the dark. Cold wallet thefts are rare because they typically require physical access, insider compromise, or a sophisticated attack on the custody infrastructure that eventually connects the wallet to hot systems for processing withdrawals. Zilliqa did not say whether the cold wallet belonged to a large-tier exchange or a smaller regional partner, leaving wide uncertainty over the potential market impact.

The chain, launched in 2017, has faced its share of technical and adoption hurdles despite being an early adopter of sharding. Projects that have been around for nearly a decade often rely on a handful of exchanges for liquidity, so a breach at even one partner can ripple through the market. ZIL is listed on several major exchanges, and the deposit freezes mean that arbitrageurs and market makers cannot rebalance positions, which could widen spreads or lead to brief dislocations once trading resumes.

Cold Wallets Are Not Always Cold Cold wallets are supposed to be impervious to internet-based attacks because their private keys are stored offline. But recent history shows that even offline environments are vulnerable. In 2024, WazirX lost over $230 million after a multi-signature cold wallet was drained in what investigators believe was a combination of social engineering and compromised offline signers. While no connection to that event exists here, the pattern of cold wallet breaches is unsettling a market that has spent years being told that offline storage equals safety.

What makes this case particularly opaque is that Zilliqa’s disclosure labels the victim as an “exchange partner,” which likely means a third-party custodian or liquidity provider using Zilliqa’s infrastructure. The lack of transparency is not necessarily suspicious—forensic investigations often require silence—but it adds to the anxiety. If the exploit was due to a vulnerability in Zilliqa’s own transaction signing or multisig logic, it would be a systemic risk. If it was a purely operational failure at the exchange level, the damage might be more contained.

As institutions globally push for clearer custody rules—a debate captured by legislation like the GENIUS Act in the U.S., where banks are trying to kill the biggest crypto bill—incidents like this provide ammunition for those demanding that exchanges be held to bank-grade security standards. The incident also comes at a time when some altcoin foundations are aggressively marketing their chains to institutional staking services. Notably, Sui’s recent price surge was driven partly by institutional staking demand, as detailed in BlockchainReporter’s coverage. Cold storage failures erode the trust that such institutional interest is built on.

Market Freeze and Ecosystem Reaction ZIL’s on-chain activity remains unaffected; the blockchain itself processes transactions as normal. The freeze only applies to centralized exchange interfaces, which still account for the bulk of retail volume. Decentralized exchanges like ZilSwap continue to operate, although liquidity is limited compared to major CEX venues. The incident is unlikely to cause a protocol-level downgrade, but it will test how the Zilliqa community and its remaining validators handle the reputational hit.

Meanwhile, developer activity on Zilliqa has been subdued relative to competing chains. According to recent data, networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain dominate by developer activity, as shown in BlockchainReporter’s weekly ranking. For a chain that once positioned itself as a high-throughput alternative, the combination of a security shock and a shrinking developer footprint leaves it in a precarious spot.

What Comes Next Zilliqa’s investigation will likely focus on whether the cold wallet’s signing process was subverted, whether a multisig threshold was bypassed, or whether physical media holding keys were accessed without authorization. Until that report surfaces, exchanges will keep deposit channels closed, effectively quarantining the ZIL that sits in their hot and cold wallets. That quarantine may last days or weeks, depending on the complexity of the forensic work and the legal implications if the exchange partner is subject to regulatory oversight in multiple jurisdictions.

For traders, the main risk is not necessarily a large-scale dump of stolen ZIL—centralized platforms are now gate-locked—but rather the overhang of uncertainty. When an investigation reveals systemic flaws, the affected asset can trade at a discount to broader market moves. For now, ZIL holders are waiting for clarity on a theft that should not have happened in the first place: a cold wallet breach, from a partner whose name they do not yet know.

AUTHOR

Brenda is a writer with three years of experience specializing in cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. She graduated from the University of Mombasa with a degree in Psychology. She has worked at Cryptopolitan and Blockchain Reporter.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:53 26d ago
Silver (XAG/USD) Price Forecast: Will Key Support Lead to a Rally? FMP Forex News
Original source text
Spot silver weekly chart so larger trend structure. Source: TradingView Nevertheless, any upswing in silver would initially represent a notable counter-trend rally toward prior dynamic support indicators, including an uptrend line and the 200-day moving average. Together, these present the upper boundary of an initial target range if bullish signals are triggered. The 200-day moving average is now near $70.47. However, the first potential upside dynamic resistance zone is marked by the falling 50-day moving average, currently at $67.44.

Bearish Risks Remain Below Support On the downside, a decisive decline below $54.78 would signal a continuation of the bearish trend. Even so, the confluence of resistance levels outlined above could limit the strength of any rebound before the broader downtrend reasserts itself. If the support range is broken, the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement at $48.29 would become the next downside target. Whether Monday’s bullish reversal develops into a more meaningful recovery or simply another counter-trend bounce will likely depend on how price reacts around the wedge breakout levels noted above.

If you’d like to know more about how to trade gold and silver, please visit our educational area.
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:05 26d ago
ScottsMiracle-Gro Announces Timing of Third Quarter 2026 Financial Results and Webcast
SMG Scotts Miracle-Gro
FMP Stock News
Original source text
July 20, 2026 16:05 ET  | Source: Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)

MARYSVILLE, Ohio, July 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE: SMG), the leading marketer of branded consumer lawn and garden products in North America, will release its third quarter financial results on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, prior to the opening of the U.S. financial markets. The Company will host a video presentation via webcast at 8:15 a.m. ET to discuss those results. The webcast will be followed by an audio question-and-answer session.

To watch the Company presentation and listen to the question-and-answer session, please register in advance at this webcast link. For those planning to participate in the question-and-answer session that follows the video presentation, please register for the webcast to view the presentation in addition to registering in advance via this audio link to receive call-in details and a unique PIN. The replay of the conference call will also be available on the Company’s investor website, where an archive of the press release and any accompanying information will remain available for at least a 12-month period.

About ScottsMiracle-Gro
With approximately $3.3 billion in sales, the Company is the leading marketer of branded consumer lawn and garden products in North America.  The Company’s brands are among the most recognized in the industry. The Company’s Scotts®, Miracle-Gro®, Ortho® and Tomcat® brands are market-leading in their categories. For additional information, visit us at www.scottsmiraclegro.com.

For investor inquiries:
Brad Chelton
Vice President
Treasury, Tax and Investor Relations
[email protected]
(937) 309-2503

For media inquiries:
Tom Matthews
Chief Communications Officer
[email protected]
(937) 844-3864
2026-07-20 21:02 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:00 26d ago
Miller Expands Deltaweld® and Auto Deltaweld® Lineup With New 600-Amp System
ITW Illinois Tool Works
FMP Stock News
Original source text
APPLETON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Miller Electric Mfg. LLC, a leading worldwide manufacturer of Miller® brand arc welding equipment, announces the launch of the new Deltaweld 600 and Auto Deltaweld 600, extending the proven Deltaweld platform to 600 amps. Built for operations that need more power when the job calls for it, Deltaweld 600 and Auto Deltaweld 600 enable an operation to weld with higher amperage for longer periods while continuing to use a system they already know. “The Deltaweld fam.
2026-07-20 21:00 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:04 26d ago
Strategy Stock Rises After $263.5 Million Sale Announcement
MSTR Strategy
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Strategy stock is charging ahead with explosive momentum. Why is MSTR stock up today? Strategy Builds Cash Reserves Without Moving on BitcoinThe dollar reserve climbed to $3.23 billion as of July 19, up from $3.0 billion the prior week, a cushion the company earmarks exclusively for servicing preferred stock dividends and debt obligations. The decision to convert equity into cash without routing the proceeds back into Bitcoin may be read by some investors as evidence that management is gravitating toward a more conservative financial footing after months of pressure on its balance sheet.

Bitcoin Strength and ETF Inflows Add Fresh Momentum to Crypto‑Linked StocksA rising Bitcoin price is adding momentum to the move. The token has reclaimed its 200-week moving average and pushed briefly above $65,000, a level it had not seen in approximately two months.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs contributed to the optimism by recording consecutive weeks of positive flows for the first time since May, gathering $197.4 million in one week and $75.7 million the next after hemorrhaging more than $8 billion across the prior eight weeks. The back-to-back inflows have been cited as evidence that sentiment may be turning.

MSTR Price Action: Strategy shares were up 2.93% at $97.63 at the time of publication on Monday. The stock is near its 52-week low of $81.81, according to Benzinga Pro.

Image: T. Schneider/Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
2026-07-20 21:00 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:01 26d ago
AGNC Investment Corp. Announces Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
AGNC AGNC Investment
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- AGNC Investment Corp. ("AGNC" or the "Company") (Nasdaq: AGNC) today announced financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. 

SECOND QUARTER 2026 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

$0.52 comprehensive income per common share, comprised of: $0.52 net income per common share $(0.01) other comprehensive loss ("OCI") per common share on investments marked-to-market through OCI $0.40 net spread and dollar roll income per common share1 Excludes less than $(0.01) per common share of estimated "catch-up" premium amortization cost due to change in projected constant prepayment rate ("CPR") estimates $8.58 tangible net book value per common share as of June 30, 2026 Increased $0.20 per common share, or 2.4%, from $8.38 per common share as of March 31, 2026 $0.36 dividends declared per common share for the second quarter  6.7% economic return on tangible common equity for the quarter Comprised of $0.36 dividends per common share and $0.20 increase in tangible net book value per common share OTHER SECOND QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS

$97.2 billion investment portfolio as of June 30, 2026, comprised of: $86.8 billion Agency mortgage-backed securities ("Agency MBS") $9.7 billion net forward purchases/(sales) of Agency MBS in the "to-be-announced" market ("TBA securities") $0.7 billion credit risk transfer ("CRT") and non-Agency securities and other mortgage credit investments 7.4x tangible net book value "at risk" leverage as of June 30, 2026 7.4x average tangible net book value "at risk" leverage for the quarter Unencumbered cash and Agency MBS totaled $7.5 billion as of June 30, 2026  Excludes unencumbered CRT and non-Agency securities Represents 62% of the Company's tangible equity as of June 30, 2026 8.6% average projected portfolio life CPR as of June 30, 2026 13.0% actual portfolio CPR for the quarter  2.00% annualized net interest spread for the quarter2  Issued 16.2 million shares of common equity through At-the-Market ("ATM") Offerings for net proceeds of $167 million ___________

Represents a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the Reconciliation of GAAP Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Net Spread and Dollar Roll Income and Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information included in this release for additional information. Please refer to Net Interest Spread Components by Funding Source included in this release for additional information regarding the Company's annualized net interest spread. MANAGEMENT REMARKS
"The investment environment in the second quarter continued to be challenging, as escalating rhetoric and hostilities between the United States and Iran largely dictated financial market performance," said Peter Federico, the Company's President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer. "Elevated energy prices and supply chain disruptions were the dominant macroeconomic concerns, particularly in April and May when maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz was severely constrained. These concerns caused Treasury yields to increase, the yield curve to flatten, and the market's monetary policy expectations to pivot from rate cuts to rate hikes.

"Despite the volatile macroeconomic backdrop, AGNC delivered a strong economic return of 6.7% for the second quarter. Elevated mortgage rates caused a reduction in projected Agency MBS supply, while demand remained strong, creating a positive technical backdrop that supported Agency MBS performance and drove spreads to benchmark rates tighter. Although mortgage spreads have declined from recent peak levels, they remain elevated by historical standards. Agency MBS also offer compelling value relative to other fixed income alternatives, particularly corporate bonds, which are at or near historically tight spreads to U.S. Treasuries despite record issuance and rising credit concerns. Together, these favorable dynamics should be supportive of Agency MBS performance over the near to intermediate term and position AGNC to continue to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders."

"AGNC's 6.7% economic return on tangible common equity in the second quarter was comprised of $0.36 of dividends per common share and a $0.20 increase in tangible net book value per common share," said Bernice Bell, the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. "Additionally, AGNC generated a 12.3% unannualized total stock return in the second quarter, with dividends reinvested, despite the significant volatility experienced by financial markets. AGNC's net spread and dollar roll income per common share was $0.40 for the second quarter, a modest decrease of $0.02 per common share from the prior quarter. Finally, AGNC concluded the second quarter with tangible 'at risk' leverage of 7.4x and a substantial liquidity position of $7.5 billion of unencumbered cash and Agency MBS, representing 62% of our tangible equity at quarter end."

TANGIBLE NET BOOK VALUE PER COMMON SHARE
As of June 30, 2026, the Company's tangible net book value per common share was $8.58 per share, an increase of 2.4% for the quarter compared to $8.38 per share as of March 31, 2026. The Company's tangible net book value per common share excludes $526 million, or $0.45 and $0.46 per share, of goodwill as of June 30 and March 31, 2026, respectively.

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
As of June 30, 2026, the Company's investment portfolio totaled $97.2 billion, comprised of:

$96.5 billion of Agency MBS and TBA securities, including: $92.1 billion of fixed-rate securities, comprised of: $82.1 billion 30-year MBS, $9.5 billion 30-year TBA securities, net, and $0.5 billion 15 and 20-year MBS and TBA securities; and $4.5 billion of collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), adjustable-rate and other Agency securities; and $0.7 billion of CRT and non-Agency securities and other mortgage credit investments. As of June 30, 2026, 30-year fixed-rate Agency MBS and TBA securities represented 94% of the Company's investment portfolio, unchanged from March 31, 2026.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company's fixed-rate Agency MBS and TBA securities' weighted average coupon was 5.04%, compared to 4.95% as of March 31, 2026, comprised of the following weighted average coupons:

5.05% for 30-year fixed-rate securities; 4.82% for 15-year fixed-rate securities; and 3.74% for 20-year fixed-rate securities. The Company accounts for TBA securities and other forward settling securities as derivative instruments and recognizes TBA dollar roll income in other gain (loss), net on the Company's financial statements. As of June 30, 2026, such positions had a fair value of $9.7 billion and a GAAP net carrying value of $52 million reported in derivative assets/(liabilities) on the Company's balance sheet, compared to $9.5 billion and $(194) million, respectively, as of March 31, 2026.

CONSTANT PREPAYMENT RATES
The Company's weighted average projected CPR for the remaining life of its Agency securities held as of June 30, 2026 decreased to 8.6% from 10.3% as of March 31, 2026. The Company's weighted average actual CPR for the second quarter was 13.0%, compared to 13.2% for the prior quarter.

The weighted average cost basis of the Company's investment portfolio was 100.7% of par value as of June 30, 2026. The Company's investment portfolio generated net premium amortization cost of $(47) million, or $(0.04) per common share, for the second quarter, which includes a "catch-up" premium amortization cost of $(5) million, or less than $(0.01) per common share, due to changes in the Company's CPR projections for certain securities acquired prior to the second quarter. This compares to net premium amortization cost for the prior quarter of $(52) million, or $(0.05) per common share, including a "catch-up" premium amortization benefit of $5 million, or less than $0.01 per common share. 

ASSET YIELDS, COST OF FUNDS AND NET INTEREST RATE SPREAD
The Company's average asset yield on its investment portfolio, excluding the TBA position, was 4.87% for the second quarter, compared to 4.95% for the prior quarter. Excluding "catch-up" premium amortization, the Company's average asset yield was 4.89% for the second quarter, compared to 4.93% for the prior quarter. Including the TBA position and excluding "catch-up" premium amortization, the Company's average asset yield for the second quarter was 4.89%, compared to 4.98% for the prior quarter.

For the second quarter, the weighted average interest rate on the Company's repurchase agreements was 3.74%, compared to 3.79% for the prior quarter. For the second quarter, the Company's TBA position had an implied financing cost of 3.46%, compared to 3.45% for the prior quarter. Inclusive of interest rate swaps, the Company's combined weighted average cost of funds for the second quarter was 2.89%, compared to 2.92% for the prior quarter.

The Company's annualized net interest spread, including the TBA position and interest rate swaps and excluding "catch-up" premium amortization, for the second quarter was 2.00%, compared to 2.06% for the prior quarter.

NET SPREAD AND DOLLAR ROLL INCOME
The Company recognized net spread and dollar roll income (a non-GAAP financial measure) for the second quarter of $0.40 per common share, compared to $0.42 per common share for the prior quarter. Net spread and dollar roll income excludes less than $(0.01) and less than $0.01 per common share of estimated "catch-up" premium amortization (cost) / benefit for the second quarter and prior quarter, respectively.

The Company's cost of funds, net interest rate spread and net spread and dollar income excludes the impact of the Company's U.S. Treasury hedges, option-based hedges, and other supplemental interest rate hedges. For additional information regarding the Company's U.S. Treasury hedges, please refer to the schedule of Key Statistics included in this release.

A reconciliation of the Company's total comprehensive income (loss) to net spread and dollar roll income and additional information regarding the Company's use of non-GAAP measures are included later in this release. 

LEVERAGE
As of June 30, 2026, $79.5 billion of repurchase agreements and $9.7 billion of net TBA dollar roll positions (at cost) were used to fund the Company's investment portfolio. The remainder, or approximately $10.3 billion, of the Company's repurchase agreements was used to fund short-term purchases of U.S. Treasury securities ("U.S. Treasury Repo") and is not included in the Company's leverage measurements. Inclusive of its net TBA position and net payable/(receivable) for unsettled investment securities, the Company's tangible net book value "at risk" leverage ratio was 7.4x as of June 30, 2026, unchanged from the prior quarter. The Company's average "at risk" leverage ratio for the second quarter was 7.4x tangible net book value, also unchanged from the prior quarter.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company's repurchase agreements used to fund its investment portfolio ("Investment Securities Repo") had a weighted average interest rate of 3.75%, compared to 3.77% as of March 31, 2026, and a weighted average remaining maturity of 13 days, compared to 20 days as of March 31, 2026. As of June 30, 2026, $42.4 billion, or 53%, of the Company's Investment Securities Repo was funded through the Company's captive broker-dealer subsidiary, Bethesda Securities, LLC. 

HEDGING ACTIVITIES
As of June 30, 2026, interest rate swaps, U.S. Treasury positions, option-based hedges (swaptions), and other interest rate hedges equaled 73% of the Company's outstanding balance of Investment Securities Repo, net TBA position, and other debt (collectively, "funding liabilities"), compared to 75% as of March 31, 2026. Excluding option-based hedges, the Company's hedge portfolio covered 82% of its funding liabilities as of June 30, 2026, compared to 83% as of March 31, 2026.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company's pay fixed interest rate swap position totaled $73.8 billion in notional amount, with an average fixed pay rate of 2.76%, an average floating receive rate of 3.68% and an average maturity of 4.0 years, compared to $76.5 billion, 2.67%, 3.68% and 4.1 years, respectively, as of March 31, 2026.

As of June 30, 2026, the Company had a net short U.S. Treasury position of $2.1 billion, receiver swaptions of $7.8 billion outstanding and a two-year swap equivalent long SOFR futures position of $2.6 billion outstanding, compared to a $5.4 billion net long U.S. Treasury position and net receiver swaptions of $7.0 billion as of March 31, 2026.

OTHER GAIN (LOSS), NET
For the second quarter, the Company recorded a net gain of $379 million in other gain (loss), net, or $0.33 per common share, compared to a net loss of $(433) million, or $(0.39) per common share, for the prior quarter. Other gain (loss), net for the second quarter was comprised of:

$(16) million of net realized losses on sales of investment securities; $(90) million of net unrealized losses on investment securities measured at fair value through net income; $179 million of interest rate swap periodic income; $461 million of net gains on interest rate swaps; $(15) million of net losses on interest rate swaptions; $(4) million of net losses on SOFR futures; $(102) million of net losses on U.S. Treasury positions; $44 million of TBA dollar roll income; $(80) million of net mark-to-market losses on TBA securities; and $3 million of other interest income (expense), net; and $(1) million of other miscellaneous losses. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
During the second quarter, the Company recorded other comprehensive income (loss) of $(7) million, or $(0.01) per common share, consisting of net unrealized losses on its Agency securities recognized through OCI, compared to $(8) million, or $(0.01) per common share, in the prior quarter.

COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS
During the second quarter, the Company declared dividends of $0.12 per share to common stockholders of record as of April 30, May 29, and June 30, 2026, totaling $0.36 per share for the quarter. Since its May 2008 initial public offering through the second quarter of 2026, the Company has declared a total of $16.3 billion in common stock dividends, or $50.80 per common share.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, OPERATING PERFORMANCE AND PORTFOLIO STATISTICS
The following measures of operating performance include net spread and dollar roll income; economic interest income; economic interest expense; and the related per common share measures and financial metrics derived from such information, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information" later in this release for further discussion of non-GAAP measures.

AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except per share data)

June 30,
2026

March 31,
2026

December 31,
2025

September 30,
2025

June 30,
2025

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

Assets:

Agency securities, at fair value (including pledged securities of $80,761, $77,364, $74,149, $68,821
and $67,375, respectively)

$                    86,784

$                    84,447

$                    81,003

$                    76,198

$                    73,232

Agency securities transferred to consolidated variable interest entities, at fair value (pledged
securities)





85

88

91

Credit risk transfer securities, at fair value (including pledged securities of $525, $545, $558, $554 and
$558, respectively)

573

593

606

609

613

Non-Agency securities, at fair value, and other mortgage credit investments (including pledged
securities of $8, $8, $13, $15 and $30, respectively)

94

93

95

97

109

U.S. Treasury securities, at fair value (including pledged securities of $11,295, $12,313, $13,056, 
$5,431 and $3,554, respectively)

12,325

12,582

13,477

5,927

3,565

Cash and cash equivalents

457

493

450

450

656

Restricted cash

1,329

1,864

1,292

1,461

1,216

Derivative assets, at fair value

260

178

169

145

155

Receivable for investment securities sold (including pledged securities of $201, $0, $149, $1,340 and
$0, respectively)

401



152

1,502



Receivable under reverse repurchase agreements

18,433

17,644

16,615

21,399

21,362

Goodwill

526

526

526

526

526

Other assets (including pledged securities of $0, $0, $0, $74 and $0, respectively)

578

477

607

567

496

Total assets

$                  121,760

$                  118,897

$                  115,077

$                  108,969

$                  102,021

Liabilities:

Repurchase agreements

$                    89,808

$                    87,616

$                    85,286

$                    74,152

$                    69,153

Debt of consolidated variable interest entities, at fair value





56

58

60

Payable for investment securities purchased

312

933

193

1,225

392

Derivative liabilities, at fair value

137

440

6

87

106

Dividends payable

184

182

182

170

164

Obligation to return securities borrowed under reverse repurchase agreements, at fair value

18,150

17,032

16,452

20,802

21,305

Accounts payable and other liabilities

626

513

509

1,031

494

Total liabilities

109,217

106,716

102,684

97,525

91,674

Stockholders' equity:

Preferred Stock - aggregate liquidation preference of $2,033, $2,033, $2,033, $2,033 and $1,688,
respectively

1,968

1,968

1,968

1,968

1,634

Common stock - $0.01 par value; 1,164.2, 1,147.8, 1,107.6, 1,072.7 and 1,041.7 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively

12

11

11

11

10

Additional paid-in capital

19,830

19,656

19,261

18,892

18,575

Retained deficit

(8,929)

(9,123)

(8,524)

(9,038)

(9,422)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(338)

(331)

(323)

(389)

(450)

Total stockholders' equity

12,543

12,181

12,393

11,444

10,347

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$                  121,760

$                  118,897

$                  115,077

$                  108,969

$                  102,021

Tangible net book value per common share 1

$                        8.58

$                        8.38

$                        8.88

$                        8.28

$                        7.81

AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended

June 30,
2026

March 31,
2026

December 31,
2025

September 30,
2025

June 30,
2025

Interest income:

Interest income

$                      1,014

$                      1,050

$                         944

$                         903

$                         830

Interest expense

709

731

738

755

668

Net interest income

305

319

206

148

162

Other gain (loss), net:

Realized (loss) gain on sale of investment securities, net

(16)

74

(26)

(81)

(177)

Unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities measured at fair value through net income, net

(90)

(889)

475

805

270

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other investments, net

485

382

340

(36)

(367)

Total other gain (loss), net

379

(433)

789

688

(274)

Expenses:

Compensation and benefits

19

23

30

20

18

Other operating expense

11

11

11

10

10

Total operating expense

30

34

41

30

28

Net income (loss)

654

(148)

954

806

(140)

Dividend on preferred stock

44

44

46

42

38

Net income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders

$                         610

$                       (192)

$                         908

$                         764

$                       (178)

Net income (loss)

$                         654

$                       (148)

$                         954

$                         806

$                       (140)

Unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities measured at fair value through other comprehensive
income (loss), net

(7)

(8)

66

61

48

Comprehensive income (loss)

647

(156)

1,020

867

(92)

Dividend on preferred stock

44

44

46

42

38

Comprehensive income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders

$                         603

$                       (200)

$                         974

$                         825

$                       (130)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic

1,157.6

1,122.6

1,089.3

1,053.0

1,017.3

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted

1,162.0

1,122.6

1094.6

1056.6

1017.3

Net income (loss) per common share - basic

$                        0.53

$                      (0.17)

$                        0.83

$                        0.73

$                      (0.17)

Net income (loss) per common share - diluted

$                        0.52

$                      (0.17)

$                        0.83

$                        0.72

$                      (0.17)

Comprehensive income (loss) per common share - basic

$                        0.52

$                      (0.18)

$                        0.89

$                        0.78

$                      (0.13)

Comprehensive income (loss) per common share - diluted

$                        0.52

$                      (0.18)

$                        0.89

$                        0.78

$                      (0.13)

Dividends declared per common share

$                        0.36

$                        0.36

$                        0.36

$                        0.36

$                        0.36

AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.

RECONCILIATION OF GAAP COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) TO NET SPREAD AND DOLLAR ROLL INCOME (NON-GAAP MEASURE) 2

(in millions, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended

June 30,
2026

March 31,
2026

December 31,
2025

September 30,
2025

June 30,
2025

Comprehensive income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders

$                         603

$                       (200)

$                         974

$                         825

$                       (130)

Adjustments to exclude realized and unrealized (gains) losses reported through net income:

Realized (gain) loss on sale of investment securities, net

16

(74)

26

81

177

Unrealized (gain) loss on investment securities measured at fair value through net income, net

90

889

(475)

(805)

(270)

(Gain) loss on derivative instruments and other securities, net

(485)

(382)

(340)

36

367

Adjustment to exclude unrealized (gain) loss reported through other comprehensive income:

Unrealized (gain) loss on available-for-sale securities measure at fair value through other
comprehensive income, net

7

8

(66)

(61)

(48)

Other adjustments:

Estimated "catch up" premium amortization cost (benefit) due to change in CPR forecast 3

5

(5)

7

14

(11)

TBA dollar roll income 4,5

44

51

27

23

24

Interest rate swap periodic income, net 4,6

179

182

217

245

282

Other interest income (expense), net 4,7

3

6

9

7

(3)

Net spread and dollar roll income available to common stockholders

$                         462

$                         475

$                         379

$                         365

$                         388

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic

1,157.6

1,122.6

1,089.3

1,053.0

1,017.3

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted

1,162.0

1,127.3

1,094.6

1,056.6

1,019.6

Net spread and dollar roll income per common share - basic

$                        0.40

$                        0.42

$                        0.35

$                        0.35

$                        0.38

Net spread and dollar roll income per common share - diluted

$                        0.40

$                        0.42

$                        0.35

$                        0.35

$                        0.38

AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.

NET INTEREST SPREAD COMPONENTS BY FUNDING SOURCE 2

(in millions, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended

June 30,
2026

March 31,
2026

December 31,
2025

September 30,
2025

June 30,
2025

Adjusted net interest and dollar roll income:

Economic interest income:

Investment securities - GAAP interest income 8

$                      1,014

$                      1,050

$                         944

$                         903

$                         830

Estimated "catch-up" premium amortization cost (benefit) due to change in CPR forecast 3

5

(5)

7

14

(11)

TBA dollar roll income - implied interest income 4,9

155

140

169

135

154

Economic interest income

1,174

1,185

1,120

1,052

973

Economic interest expense:

Repurchase agreements and other debt - GAAP interest expense

(709)

(731)

(738)

(755)

(668)

TBA dollar roll income - implied interest expense 4,10

(111)

(89)

(142)

(112)

(130)

Interest rate swap periodic income, net 4,6

179

182

217

245

282

Economic interest expense

(641)

(638)

(663)

(622)

(516)

Other interest and dividend income 3











Adjusted net interest and dollar roll income

$                         533

$                         547

$                         457

$                         430

$                         457

Net interest spread:

Average asset yield:

Investment securities - average asset yield

4.87 %

4.95 %

4.87 %

4.83 %

4.89 %

Estimated "catch-up" premium amortization cost (benefit) due to change in CPR forecast

0.02 %

(0.02) %

0.03 %

0.08 %

(0.06) %

Investment securities average asset yield, excluding "catch-up" premium amortization

4.89 %

4.93 %

4.90 %

4.91 %

4.83 %

TBA securities - average implied asset yield 9

4.87 %

5.42 %

4.91 %

5.31 %

5.14 %

Average asset yield 11

4.89 %

4.98 %

4.91 %

4.95 %

4.87 %

Average total cost of funds:

Repurchase agreements and other debt - average funding cost

3.74 %

3.79 %

4.13 %

4.43 %

4.44 %

TBA securities - average implied funding cost 10

3.46 %

3.45 %

4.03 %

4.31 %

4.29 %

Average cost of funds, before interest rate swap periodic income, net 11

3.70 %

3.75 %

4.11 %

4.42 %

4.42 %

Interest rate swap periodic income, net 12

(0.81) %

(0.83) %

(1.01) %

(1.25) %

(1.56) %

Average total cost of funds 13

2.89 %

2.92 %

3.10 %

3.17 %

2.86 %

Average net interest spread

2.00 %

2.06 %

1.81 %

1.78 %

2.01 %

AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.

KEY STATISTICS*

(in millions, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Key Balance Sheet Statistics:

June 30,
2026

March 31,
2026

December 31,
2025

September 30,
2025

June 30,
2025

Investment securities: 8

Fixed-rate Agency MBS, at fair value - as of period end

$                    82,334

$                    80,466

$                    77,483

$                    73,283

$                    71,104

Other Agency MBS, at fair value - as of period end

$                      4,450

$                      3,981

$                      3,605

$                      3,003

$                      2,219

Credit risk transfer securities, at fair value - as of period end

$                         573

$                         593

$                         606

$                         609

$                         613

Non-Agency MBS, at fair value - as of period end 14

$                           24

$                           24

$                           25

$                           28

$                           43

Total investment securities, at fair value - as of period end

$                    87,381

$                    85,064

$                    81,719

$                    76,923

$                    73,979

Total investment securities, at cost - as of period end

$                    88,471

$                    86,058

$                    81,817

$                    77,563

$                    75,484

Total investment securities, at par - as of period end

$                    87,896

$                    84,847

$                    80,830

$                    76,625

$                    74,572

Average investment securities, at cost

$                    83,366

$                    84,814

$                    77,562

$                    74,783

$                    67,887

Average investment securities, at par

$                    82,557

$                    83,659

$                    76,647

$                    73,836

$                    66,876

TBA securities: 15

Net TBA portfolio - as of period end, at fair value

$                      9,728

$                      9,548

$                    12,988

$                    13,841

$                      8,263

Net TBA portfolio - as of period end, at cost

$                      9,676

$                      9,742

$                    12,917

$                    13,805

$                      8,162

Net TBA portfolio - as of period end, carrying value

$                           52

$                       (194)

$                           71

$                           36

$                         101

Average net TBA portfolio, at cost

$                    12,729

$                    10,343

$                    13,764

$                    10,163

$                    11,996

Average repurchase agreements and other debt 16

$                    75,070

$                    77,120

$                    69,943

$                    66,654

$                    59,469

Average stockholders' equity 17

$                    12,447

$                    12,405

$                    11,828

$                    10,732

$                    10,118

Tangible net book value per common share 1

$                        8.58

$                        8.38

$                        8.88

$                        8.28

$                        7.81

Tangible net book value "at risk" leverage - average 18

7.4 :1

7.4 :1

7.4 :1

7.5 :1

7.5 :1

Tangible net book value "at risk" leverage - as of period end 19

7.4 :1

7.4 :1

7.2 :1

7.6 :1

7.6 :1

Key Performance Statistics:

Investment securities: 8

Average coupon

5.14 %

5.27 %

5.19 %

5.20 %

5.14 %

Average asset yield

4.87 %

4.95 %

4.87 %

4.83 %

4.89 %

Average asset yield, excluding "catch-up" premium amortization

4.89 %

4.93 %

4.90 %

4.91 %

4.83 %

Average coupon - as of period end

5.05 %

5.25 %

5.19 %

5.17 %

5.14 %

Average asset yield - as of period end

4.91 %

4.93 %

4.93 %

4.94 %

4.92 %

Average actual CPR for securities held during the period

13.0 %

13.2 %

9.7 %

8.3 %

8.7 %

Average forecasted CPR - as of period end

8.6 %

10.3 %

9.6 %

8.6 %

7.8 %

Total premium amortization benefit (cost)

$                         (47)

$                         (52)

$                         (51)

$                         (57)

$                         (30)

TBA securities:

Average coupon - as of period end 20

4.89 %

4.11 %

4.98 %

5.11 %

5.22 %

Average implied asset yield 9

4.87 %

5.42 %

4.91 %

5.31 %

5.14 %

Combined investment and TBA securities - average asset yield, excluding "catch-up" premium
amortization 11

4.89 %

4.98 %

4.91 %

4.95 %

4.87 %

Cost of funds: 13

Repurchase agreements - average funding cost

3.74 %

3.79 %

4.13 %

4.43 %

4.44 %

TBA securities - average implied funding cost 10

3.46 %

3.45 %

4.03 %

4.31 %

4.29 %

Interest rate swaps - average periodic income 12

(0.81) %

(0.83) %

(1.01) %

(1.25) %

(1.56) %

Average total cost of funds, inclusive of TBAs and interest rate swap periodic income, net 11

2.89 %

2.92 %

3.10 %

3.17 %

2.86 %

Repurchase agreements - average funding cost as of period end

3.75 %

3.77 %

3.98 %

4.38 %

4.49 %

Interest rate swaps - average net pay/(receive) rate as of period end 21

(0.92) %

(1.01) %

(1.29) %

(1.76) %

(2.34) %

Net interest spread:

Combined investment and TBA securities average net interest spread, excluding "catch-up" premium
amortization

2.00 %

2.06 %

1.81 %

1.78 %

2.01 %

Expenses % of average stockholders' equity - annualized

0.96 %

1.10 %

1.39 %

1.12 %

1.11 %

Economic return (loss) on tangible common equity - unannualized 22

6.7 %

(1.6) %

11.6 %

10.6 %

(1.0) %

Key Interest Rate Hedge Statistics

Interest rate swaps:

Average interest rate swaps, notional amount (excluding forward starting swaps), net

$                    75,216

$                    71,607

$                    59,863

$                    45,656

$                    45,849

Average pay-fixed rate

2.71 %

2.65 %

2.56 %

2.25 %

1.94 %

Average receive-floating rate

3.65 %

3.67 %

3.98 %

4.35 %

4.38 %

U.S. Treasury securities:

Average short U.S. Treasury securities, at cost

$                    16,939

$                    16,772

$                    18,414

$                    21,466

$                    19,754

Average short U.S. Treasury securities yield

4.23 %

4.25 %

4.18 %

4.21 %

4.16 %

Average long U.S. Treasury securities, at cost

$                    12,370

$                    12,033

$                    12,964

$                      4,749

$                      2,044

Average long U.S. Treasury securities yield

3.70 %

3.71 %

3.74 %

4.01 %

4.45 %

U.S. Treasury futures:

Average short U.S. Treasury futures, at cost

$                      4,006

$                      3,210

$                      1,901

$                      1,834

$                      1,208

Average short U.S. Treasury futures implied yield 23

4.73 %

4.64 %

4.71 %

4.60 %

4.53 %

Average long U.S. Treasury futures, at cost

$                      9,917

$                    11,147

$                         708

$                           —

$                           —

Average long U.S. Treasury futures implied yield 23

3.89 %

3.71 %

3.92 %

— %

— %

Average reverse repurchase agreement rate

3.63 %

3.68 %

4.00 %

4.34 %

4.33 %

*Except as noted below, average numbers for each period are weighted based on days on the Company's books and records. All percentages are annualized, unless otherwise noted.
Numbers in financial tables may not total due to rounding.

Tangible net book value per common share excludes preferred stock liquidation preference and goodwill. Table includes non-GAAP financial measures and/or amounts derived from non-GAAP measures. Refer to "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information" for additional discussion of non-GAAP financial measures. "Catch-up" premium amortization cost/benefit is reported in interest income on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Amount reported in gain (loss) on derivatives instruments and other securities, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Dollar roll income represents the price differential, or "price drop," between the TBA price for current month settlement versus the TBA price for forward month settlement. Amount includes dollar roll income (loss) on long and short TBA securities. Amount excludes TBA mark-to-market adjustments. Represents periodic interest rate swap settlements. Amount excludes interest rate swap termination fees, mark-to-market adjustments and price alignment interest income (expense) on margin deposits. Other interest income (expense), net includes interest income on cash and cash equivalents, price alignment interest income (expense) on margin deposits, and other miscellaneous interest income (expense). Investment securities include Agency MBS, CRT and non-Agency securities. Amounts exclude TBA and forward settling securities accounted for as derivative instruments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations. The average implied asset yield and associated gross income for TBA dollar roll transactions is extrapolated by adding the average TBA implied funding cost (Note 10) to the net dollar roll yield. The net dollar roll yield is calculated by dividing dollar roll income (Note 5) by the average net TBA balance (cost basis) outstanding for the period. The implied funding cost/benefit of TBA dollar roll transactions is determined using the "price drop" (Note 5) and market-based assumptions regarding the "cheapest-to-deliver" collateral that can be delivered to satisfy the TBA contract, such as the anticipated collateral's weighted average coupon, weighted average maturity and projected 1-month CPR. The average implied funding cost/benefit for TBA transactions represents the Company's long TBA position only, weighted based on the Company's daily average long TBA position outstanding for the period. Amount calculated on a weighted average basis based on average balances outstanding during the period and their respective asset yield/funding cost. Represents interest rate swap periodic cost/income measured as a percent of total mortgage funding (Investment Securities Repo, other debt and net TBA securities (at cost)). Cost of funds excludes U.S. Treasury, option-based, and other supplemental hedges used to hedge a portion of the Company's interest rate risk and U.S. Treasury Repo. Non-Agency MBS, at fair value, excludes $70 million, $69 million, $70 million, $69 million and $66 million of other mortgage credit investments held as of June 30 and March 31, 2026 and December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2025, respectively. Includes TBA dollar roll position and, if applicable, forward settling securities accounted for as derivative instruments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations. Amount is net of short TBA securities. Average repurchase agreements and other debt excludes U.S. Treasury Repo. Average stockholders' equity calculated as the average month-ended stockholders' equity during the quarter. Average tangible net book value "at risk" leverage during the period was calculated by dividing the sum of the daily weighted average Investment Securities Repo, other debt, and TBA and forward settling securities (at cost) outstanding for the period by the sum of average stockholders' equity adjusted to exclude goodwill. Leverage excludes U.S. Treasury Repo. Tangible net book value "at risk" leverage as of period end was calculated by dividing the sum of the amount outstanding under Investment Securities Repo, other debt, net TBA position and forward settling securities (at cost), and net receivable / payable for unsettled investment securities outstanding by the sum of total stockholders' equity adjusted to exclude goodwill. Leverage excludes U.S. Treasury Repo. Average TBA coupon is for the long TBA position only. Includes forward starting swaps not yet in effect as of reported period-end. Economic return (loss) on tangible common equity represents the sum of the change in tangible net book value per common share and dividends declared on common stock during the period over the beginning tangible net book value per common share. The implied yields for Treasury futures are calculated based on the "cheapest-to-deliver" security that can be delivered to satisfy the futures contract identified at the time the futures contract was initiated using data sourced from a third-party model. STOCKHOLDER CALL
AGNC invites stockholders, prospective stockholders and analysts to attend the AGNC stockholder call on July 21, 2026 at 8:30 am ET. Interested persons who do not plan on asking a question and have internet access are encouraged to utilize the webcast at www.AGNC.com. Those who plan on participating in the Q&A or do not have internet available may access the call by dialing (877) 300-5922 (U.S. domestic) or (412) 902-6621 (international). Please advise the operator you are dialing in for the AGNC Investment Corp. stockholder call.

A slide presentation will accompany the call and will be available in the Investors section of the Company's website at www.AGNC.com. Select the Q2 2026 Stockholder Presentation link to download the presentation in advance of the stockholder call.

An archived audio of the stockholder call combined with the slide presentation will be available on the AGNC website after the call on July 21, 2026. In addition, there will be a phone recording available one hour after the call on July 21, 2026 through August 4, 2026. Those who are interested in hearing the recording of the presentation, can access it by dialing (855) 669-9658 (U.S. domestic) or (412) 317-0088 (international), passcode 8844707.

For further information, please contact Investor Relations at (301) 968-9300 or [email protected].

ABOUT AGNC INVESTMENT CORP.
Founded in 2008, AGNC Investment Corp. (Nasdaq: AGNC) is a leading investor in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities (Agency MBS), which benefit from a guarantee against credit losses by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. We invest on a leveraged basis, financing our Agency MBS assets primarily through repurchase agreements, and utilize dynamic risk management strategies intended to protect the value of our portfolio from interest rate and other market risks.

AGNC has a track record of providing favorable long-term returns for our stockholders through substantial monthly dividend income, with over $16 billion of common stock dividends paid since inception. Our business is a significant source of private capital for the U.S. residential housing market, and our team has extensive experience managing mortgage assets across market cycles.

We use our website (www.AGNC.com) and AGNC's LinkedIn and X accounts to distribute information about the Company. Investors should monitor these channels in addition to our press releases, filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), public conference calls and webcasts, as information posted through them may be deemed material. Our website, alerts and social media channels are not incorporated by reference into, and are not a part of, this document or any report filed with the SEC. To learn more about The Premier Agency Residential Mortgage REIT, please visit www.AGNC.com, follow us on LinkedIn and X, and sign up for Investor Alerts.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management of the Company at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements or from our historic performance due to a variety of important factors, including, without limitation, changes in monetary policy and other factors that affect interest rates, MBS spreads to benchmark interest rates, the forward yield curve, or prepayment rates; the availability and terms of financing; changes in the market value of the Company's assets; general economic or geopolitical conditions; liquidity and other conditions in Agency MBS and other financial markets; and legislative and regulatory changes that could adversely affect the business of the Company. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements are included in the Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Copies are available on the SEC's website, www.sec.gov. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise.

USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, the Company's results of operations discussed in this release include certain non-GAAP financial information, including "net spread and dollar roll income"; "economic interest income" and "economic interest expense"; and the related per common share measures and certain financial metrics derived from such non-GAAP information, such as "cost of funds" and "net interest spread."

Net spread and dollar roll income available to common stockholders is measured as comprehensive income (loss) available (attributable) to common stockholders (GAAP measure) adjusted to: (i) exclude gains/losses on investment securities recognized through net income or other comprehensive income and gains/losses on derivative instruments and other securities (GAAP measures), (ii) exclude retrospective "catch-up" adjustments to premium amortization cost due to changes in projected CPR estimates and (iii) include interest rate swap periodic income/ cost, TBA dollar roll income and other miscellaneous interest income/expense. As defined, net spread and dollar roll income available to common stockholders represents net interest income/ expense (GAAP measure) adjusted to exclude retrospective "catch-up" adjustments to premium amortization cost due to changes in projected CPR estimates and to include TBA dollar roll income, interest rate swap periodic income/cost and other miscellaneous interest income/expense, less total operating expense (GAAP measure) and dividends on preferred stock (GAAP measure).

By providing users of the Company's financial information with such measures in addition to the related GAAP measures, the Company believes users have greater transparency into the information used by the Company's management in its financial and operational decision-making. The Company also believes that it is important for users of its financial information to consider information related to the Company's current financial performance without the effects of certain transactions that are not necessarily indicative of its current investment portfolio performance and operations.

Specifically, the Company believes the inclusion of TBA dollar roll income in its non-GAAP measures is meaningful as TBAs are economically equivalent to holding and financing generic Agency MBS using short-term repurchase agreements but are recognized under GAAP in gain/ loss on derivative instruments in the Company's statement of operations. Similarly, the Company believes that the inclusion of periodic interest rate swap settlements in such measures, which are recognized under GAAP in gain/loss on derivative instruments, is meaningful as interest rate swaps are the primary instrument the Company uses to economically hedge against fluctuations in the Company's borrowing costs and inclusion of periodic interest rate swap settlements is more indicative of the Company's total cost of funds than interest expense alone. Finally, the Company believes the exclusion of "catch-up" adjustments to premium amortization cost is meaningful as it excludes the cumulative effect from prior reporting periods due to current changes in future prepayment expectations and, therefore, exclusion of such "catch-up" cost or benefit is more indicative of the current earnings potential of the Company's investment portfolio.

However, because such measures are incomplete measures of the Company's financial performance and involve differences from results computed in accordance with GAAP, they should be considered as supplementary to, and not as a substitute for, results computed in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because not all companies use identical calculations, the Company's presentation of such non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures of other companies.

A reconciliation of GAAP comprehensive income (loss) to non-GAAP "net spread and dollar roll income" is included in this release.

CONTACT:
Investors - (301) 968-9300
Media - (301) 968-9303

SOURCE AGNC Investment Corp.
2026-07-20 20:58 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:35 26d ago
Warner Bros. Closes at Lowest Since Dec. 4 | Closing Bell
WBD Warner Bros Discovery
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Comprehensive cross-platform coverage of the U.S. market close on Bloomberg Television, Bloomberg Radio, and YouTube with Katie Greifeld, Sally Bakewell, Carol Massar and Tim Stenovec. -------- More on Bloomberg Television and Markets Like this video?
2026-07-20 20:57 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:01 26d ago
HTX Research's Andy appeared as a guest on the HTX Expert Lecture Series: For Q3, BTC's direction hinges on liquidity, while ETH's direction hinges on regulation.
ETH Ethereum HT Huobi Token
CoinGecko News
Original source text
HTX Research Head and Lead Analyst Andy Liu recently guested at Huobi’s Expert Lecture Hall, delivering a presentation themed “Q3 2026 Outlook: The New Order of the Crypto Market Amid Global Liquidity Repricing”. He noted that BTC is no longer merely a native crypto asset, but a proxy for global U.S. dollar liquidity. The three core variables driving BTC’s performance in Q3 are: liquidity for direction, ETFs for elasticity, and the U.S. dollar for risk. On Ethereum, Andy Liu highlighted that the current issue facing Ethereum is not whether its ecosystem is growing, but whether that growth can translate into value for ETH. In the medium to long term, Ethereum remains one of the most critical settlement and application infrastructures in crypto. However, in the short term, ETH must re-prove that ecosystem growth can be converted into ETH value. Thus, the core assessment for ETH in Q3 is: regulation for direction, DeFi for elasticity, and fees and burns for confirmation.

Relevant content

Native Markets Discontinues USDH, Will Continue to Support 1:1 Redemptions and Exchanges in the Coming Months

According to official announcements, Native Markets has announced that the USDH official website has been sunset. Over the coming months, users will still be able to redeem and exchange USDH for U.S. dollar assets at a 1:1 ratio via the redemption page provided by the Bridge. Native Markets stated that the final exit procedures for USDH and related information will continue to be made available through the USDH official website.

4 hours ago

Hackers Attack Kenya's Presidential Official Website, Demand 5 Bitcoin Ransom

Kenya's government is investigating the hacking incident targeting President William Ruto's official website. On July 18, attackers briefly altered the president's official site page and demanded a ransom of 5 BTC, threatening to leak undisclosed data if not paid. Kenya's Cabinet Secretary for Information, Communication and Digital Economy stated that the government has activated its cybersecurity response mechanism and is conducting a forensic investigation in collaboration with relevant agencies. There is currently no evidence indicating unauthorized access to or leakage of sensitive data, and government digital services remain operational.

4 hours ago

Bitcoin mining firm LM Funding rebrands as PowerCompute, shifting focus to AI computing power infrastructure.

Bitcoin mining company LM Funding America (NASDAQ: LMFA) announced it will rebrand to PowerCompute Inc. and adopt a new stock ticker "PWCM" effective July 22. The company stated that the rename marks its strategic transformation, as it leverages its existing 26 megawatts (MW) of owned power infrastructure to expand into high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure businesses. Currently, the firm operates two facilities in Oklahoma and Mississippi, U.S., with 26 MW of power capacity, and plans to provide infrastructure services to AI computing clients. It will also continue holding Bitcoin assets as part of its balance sheet.

4 hours ago

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve stocks have fallen to their lowest level since 1983.

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) crude oil inventories fell by approximately 5.1 million barrels last week, dropping to 311.4 million barrels, the lowest level since 1983.

4 hours ago

Morgan Stanley: As memory shortage intensifies, DRAM prices may rise by at least 25% quarter-on-quarter in the third quarter.

Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore noted that following discussions with multiple data center procurement personnel last week, the current tight memory supply shows no signs of easing. DRAM and other memory products are expected to rise by at least 25% on a comparable basis from the second quarter to the third quarter, a figure higher than previous forecasts from Morgan Stanley and third-party institutions. Moore added that the memory shortage could further deteriorate in 2027 and 2028, as AI demand is consuming massive DRAM capacity, squeezing supplies for other sectors such as PCs and smartphones. Morgan Stanley further holds that the current market is not only grappling with surging memory demand driven by AI, but insufficient memory supply itself is emerging as a key bottleneck limiting AI expansion.

4 hours ago

The US military said it has forced seven commercial vessels to divert course and disabled one to restrict access to Iranian ports.

U.S. Central Command said that as of July 20, U.S. military forces have forced seven commercial vessels to alter their routes and disabled one merchant ship to prevent vessels from entering or leaving Iranian ports. (Jinshi)

4 hours ago
2026-07-20 20:57 26d ago
2026-07-20 11:21 26d ago
TRON Users Are Exploding!
TRX Tron
CoinGecko News
Original source text
@trondao has registered 394 million total accounts, the latest in a rapid series of user milestones that underline the network's position as one of the busiest payment blockchains in the world. On-chain data shows daily active accounts rose 4.64% in 24 hours to reach 4,646,026, a figure driven largely by persistent stablecoin activity across emerging markets.

Stablecoins Remain the Core EngineThe account surge is not happening in isolation. The network processed $2.0 trillion in cumulative USDT transfers in Q1 2026 alone, reinforcing TRON's role as the primary settlement rail for the world's largest stablecoin. TRON now hosts more than $86 billion in stablecoin supply, with USDT accounting for 98.37% of that total, and the chain processes an average of $23 billion in daily USDT transfers.

With median transfer fees of just $0.09 compared to Ethereum's $3.73, and confirmation times of three seconds versus twelve, TRON offers a practical middle ground: fast and cheap enough for everyday transfers, yet established enough to handle billions in daily volume. That cost structure is a key reason the network continues to attract users in regions where traditional banking infrastructure is limited or expensive.

Emerging Markets Fuel the Growth Geographically, activity is weighted toward Asia, accounting for nearly $341 billion annually, with emerging markets including Turkey, Indonesia, and India contributing significant volume, reflecting TRON's appeal where transaction costs drive demand for efficient infrastructure.

Regions with high adoption of mobile-based financial services show particularly strong engagement with TRON, as the platform's design aligns well with the needs of users in emerging economies where access to low-cost, cross-border financial infrastructure is paramount. On-chain data also shows the network has been adding roughly one million new accounts in under a week , a pace that has pushed total accounts from 391 million to 394 million in a matter of days.

The growth in active addresses carries more analytical weight than raw account totals. Blockchain analysts note that active accounts are a more valuable metric than total accounts, since total figures can include millions of inactive or abandoned wallets, while active accounts measure real economic behaviour. A jump of nearly 4.7% in a single day points to genuine transactional demand rather than passive wallet creation.

Sources:
Messari: State of TRON Q1 2026
Arkham Intelligence: TRON Stablecoin Ecosystem Report
Crowdfund Insider: Nansen Q1 2026 TRON Report
2026-07-20 20:57 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:34 26d ago
TRON DAO’s Adrian Wall urges passage of CLARITY Act to ensure US crypto leadership
TRX Tron
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Adrian Wall, Senior Director of US Policy at TRON DAO, is sounding the alarm on Capitol Hill’s pace. Appearing on the Thinking Crypto podcast in July 2026, Wall argued that the CLARITY Act needs to pass before the August recess, or the US risks watching its crypto industry migrate to friendlier jurisdictions.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, formally known as H.R. 3633, would establish structured federal oversight for digital commodities and related assets.

Where the bill stands The CLARITY Act has already cleared some major hurdles. It was introduced in the House on May 29, 2025, and passed with bipartisan support on July 17, 2025, by a vote of 294 to 134.

Advertisement

The Senate Banking Committee advanced its version of the bill on May 14, 2026, with a 15-9 vote. It was then placed on the Senate calendar on June 1, 2026, where it now sits waiting for floor action.

President Trump has publicly endorsed the legislation, urging the Senate to act and framing it as essential to maintaining US competitiveness in digital assets. A House Financial Services Subcommittee hearing took place in New York on July 17, 2026, keeping the conversation alive as the legislative window narrows.

What the CLARITY Act actually does The bill’s primary goal is resolving one of crypto’s oldest headaches: figuring out which federal agency has jurisdiction over which digital assets. The CLARITY Act draws clearer lines between digital commodities and digital securities, assigning oversight responsibilities accordingly. It creates a pathway for tokens that may start as securities to eventually be treated as commodities once they become sufficiently decentralized.

Opponents, particularly some Democratic lawmakers, have pushed back on consumer protection provisions, arguing the bill doesn’t go far enough to shield retail investors from fraud and market manipulation.

Why this matters for investors Wall’s urgency on the podcast reflected a broader industry sentiment. The window for legislative action before Congress leaves for August recess is narrow, and the crypto industry has seen promising momentum followed by legislative inertia before.

The CLARITY Act’s bipartisan House passage by a vote of 294 to 134 and its 15-9 committee advancement in the Senate represent concrete legislative progress. Whether the Senate can convert that momentum into law before the recess clock runs out is the question that matters most for US crypto markets heading into the second half of 2026.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-20 20:57 26d ago
2026-07-20 18:14 26d ago
XLM: Stellar DeFi Security Standards and Best Practices
XLM Stellar Lumens
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Ecosystem

Author

Justin Rice

Publishing date

DeFi on Stellar is no longer experimental: protocols are live, they lock hundreds of millions of dollars worth of value, and they operate at a scale that impacts thousands of users. That's a milestone worth recognizing. It's also a moment that requires more of many teams in the ecosystem.

This post defines a set of practices SDF believes should be standard for any DeFi protocol on Stellar that holds, lends, swaps, or otherwise touches user funds. Some teams already do most of this. Some are working toward it. We're putting it in writing because builders have told us they want a clearer picture of what good looks like, and because the ecosystem is healthier when expectations are explicit rather than assumed.

None of the suggestions are novel. Most of them reflect what mature DeFi teams already do across other ecosystems, adapted to the realities of building on Stellar. We're publishing it so the conversation can be more concrete: this is what we mean when we talk about responsible DeFi on Stellar.

Why standards, why nowThree things have shifted in the last year.

First, Stellar's DeFi ecosystem is in a different place than it was twelve months ago. More users are active onchain, more value is sitting in lending pools and AMMs, and more protocols are composed with each other. Practices that were reasonable for an early-stage experimental pool don't work for a production protocol holding tens of millions of dollars of user funds.

Second, the attacker side has gotten faster, cheaper, and more capable. Vulnerability discovery, exploit-code generation, social-engineering at scale, and reconnaissance against deployed contracts have all moved from "skilled specialist with weeks of time" to "competent operator with a good toolchain." AI-assisted analysis is now being run against published audit reports to find what auditors flagged but teams didn't fully remediate, and against open-source contract code to surface patterns that have been exploited elsewhere. The result is that oracle manipulations, novel flash-loan patterns, governance takeovers, and admin-key compromises are no longer rare events at the frontier of DeFi: they're a baseline operational risk for any protocol of meaningful size. A team that ships without thinking through these possibilities is not innovating; it's externalizing risk onto its users.

Third, Stellar's DeFi ecosystem now has enough interconnection that one protocol's failure can ripple through several others. A compromised oracle, a drained liquidity pool, or a cascade of forced liquidations don't stay contained. Standards are partly a tool for protecting users of an individual protocol, but they're also a tool for protecting the rest of the ecosystem from any single protocol's mistake.

We don't think the answer is heavy-handed gatekeeping. Stellar is permissionless and should stay that way. But permissionless access does not mean protocols that hold user funds should operate without mature security and risk practices. These are the standards SDF expects serious DeFi teams to work toward, and what follows is what we'd like to see become normal.

Security audits that actually mean somethingA third-party security audit by a recognized firm is table stakes for any protocol that handles user funds. The baseline:

A completed audit before any material user funds are accepted, conducted by a firm with a demonstrated track record in the relevant primitive (lending, AMM, derivatives, bridging, etc.). The audit report should be published, not just summarized in a tweet, and it should include a full summary of findings, the remediated status of all discovered vulnerabilities, and the specific version of the code that was reviewed.

Audit-to-deployment parity. The code running in production should be the code that was reviewed. When teams deploy meaningful changes after the last audit, those changes should be disclosed, and a re-audit (or at minimum a scoped follow-up review) should be initiated before changes are pushed to mainnet.

Audit cadence tied to change, not the calendar. A protocol that ships frequently needs a security partner that reviews frequently. A protocol that's largely static after launch still benefits from periodic re-review as the threat landscape evolves.

When the absence of an audit is unavoidable—for early experiments, hackathon projects, or genuinely pre-product code—that status should be communicated unmistakably to users, and the protocol should not be marketed as production-ready.

A standing channel for disclosure: bug bountiesAn audit is a point-in-time snapshot. It tells you the code was sound as of a particular version on a particular date, reviewed by a particular set of eyes. It says nothing about the vulnerability discovered six months later, or the researcher who finds a bug next week and has to decide what to do with it. Live protocols need a way to receive that information safely, and a live protocol without one is trusting that whoever finds the next bug chooses to report it rather than exploit it or sell it.

The baseline:

A published vulnerability disclosure policy that tells a researcher exactly where to send a report, what's in scope, what to expect in response, and a commitment not to pursue good-faith reporters. This should be trivially discoverable—linked from the docs and the site, not buried in a Discord channel.

A standing bug bounty program, scaled so the reward for a critical finding is meaningful relative to what an attacker could extract by exploiting it instead. A bounty that pays a fraction of the exploitable value is not really competing for the researcher's decision.

A triage and remediation process with committed timelines, so reports don't sit unread. A researcher who gets no acknowledgment for two weeks is a researcher who stops reporting—or reports somewhere you'd rather they didn't.

A risk posture scaled to what you holdAudits are necessary but not sufficient. A protocol holding tens of millions of dollars in user funds must operate with a security and operational risk posture commensurate with the sheer scale of the assets it manages. What this looks like in practice depends on a protocol's size, stage, and structure, but the components are broadly the same:

Written risk procedures that describe how the team identifies, evaluates, and responds to security and operational risks. These should include a risk appetite statement outlining what the team is willing to accept, what it isn't, and how those lines are enforced.

Written vendor and partner risk management policy, including a clear-eyed view of every external dependency. Which oracles a protocol relies on, which bridges, which off-chain services, what happens if any one of them is wrong or compromised, and what the team would do in the first hour after a failure.

Security procedures for the team itself, including key custody arrangements, multisig thresholds, hardware-wallet practices, code-review requirements, and deployment controls.

For protocols at scale, we encourage independent validation of these controls—SOC 1 / SOC 2 reports or a functionally equivalent third-party attestation. The point isn't the certificate; it's the discipline of being audited by someone who isn't on the team.

Economic risk: modeling and parameter governanceNot every DeFi failure is a code exploit. Some of the most damaging losses come from economic design that was sound under normal conditions and broke under stress: collateral that couldn't be liquidated fast enough in a sharp drawdown, incentives that unwound in a bank-run dynamic, a parameter that was safe in isolation and dangerous in combination with another. Code audits rarely catch these, because the code did exactly what it was written to do. The design was the vulnerability.

Protocols whose safety depends on economic parameters—lending markets, AMMs, stablecoins, derivatives—should treat that design with the same rigor as the code:

Stress testing and scenario modeling against sharp price moves, liquidity crunches, and correlated drawdowns, not just steady-state conditions. The relevant question is not whether the system works on an average day but whether it survives its worst plausible one.

Concentration limits on collateral, liquidity, and counterparty exposure, so a single asset, pool, or actor can't put the whole protocol at risk.

Liquidation simulations that confirm positions can actually be unwound at scale, under stress, with the liquidity that would realistically be available—not the liquidity present on a calm day.

Oracle manipulation modeling that asks what an adversary could do by moving a price feed, and how much it would cost them relative to what they'd gain.

A parameter-change review process. Changes to risk parameters—collateral factors, interest-rate curves, liquidation thresholds—should go through documented review and, for non-urgent changes, the same timelock and disclosure discipline as any other privileged action. A parameter tweak can drain a protocol as effectively as a code bug.

Financial resilience: budgeting for when things go wrongThe DeFi protocols that recover from incidents tend to be the ones that planned for them financially before they happened. That planning has two parts.

First, a capital buffer. As a directional benchmark, we encourage protocols to set aside approximately 5% of total user-facing liabilities as a first-loss resource. For a protocol with $100M TVL, that's something on the order of $5M in liquid assets earmarked to absorb shocks before they reach users. The exact figure is less important than the principle: the team should know, in advance, how much it can absorb without users taking the hit, and where that capital lives. For decentralized protocols, this might take the form of a treasury allocation, a governance-controlled safety module, or an equivalent mechanism appropriate to the protocol's structure.

Second, insurance where it makes sense. It is not a substitute for security, but it is a meaningful tool, and we'd like to see more Stellar protocols evaluating it seriously.

Together, a capital buffer and insurance are how a protocol says, in advance, that the cost of a bad day will not fall entirely on its users.

Infrastructure hygieneSome of the largest losses in DeFi history have resulted from compromised dependencies: manipulated oracles, hacked bridges, leaked keys. Every team needs to pay attention to infrastructure hygiene, which looks like this:

For protocols that consume price oracles: price deviation guards, time-weighted averages, multi-source consensus, and circuit breakers that pause sensitive functions when something looks wrong. Trust no single price feed for liquidation decisions if you can avoid it.

For protocols that operate bridges or cross-chain logic: documented assumptions about every chain you touch, and a written response plan for the day a counterparty chain has a problem.

For admin keys and protocol governance: multisig with meaningful thresholds and geographically distributed signers; hardware key storage; clearly documented and rehearsed procedures for emergency action. The convenience of a single key is not worth what it costs when it's compromised.

For circuit breakers and emergency pauses: build them, test them, and know who can pull the lever. A protocol that cannot pause a compromised contract is a protocol that watches its users lose funds in real time.

Governance and upgrade controlsMost Stellar DeFi protocols retain some privileged power: an admin key that can pause the system, a governance process that can change parameters, an upgrade path that can replace the contract logic users are trusting. These capabilities are often necessary. They are also, in the wrong hands, the fastest way to drain a protocol—a governance takeover or a compromised admin key doesn't need to find a bug, because it already holds the keys. The bar here is that privileged power is constrained, documented, and observable:

Public documentation of every privileged role —what it can do, who holds it, and how it's constrained. Users and integrators should be able to see the full set of powers that exist over a protocol without reading the source or trusting a verbal assurance.

Multisig with meaningful thresholds and geographically distributed signers, hardware key storage, and a defined, rehearsed process for signer rotation when someone joins, leaves, or is compromised. The convenience of a single key is not worth what it costs when it's compromised.

Timelocks on non-urgent privileged changes, so users can see a change coming and exit if they disagree with it. A protocol that can alter the rules with no delay is asking users to trust that it never will.

Clearly scoped emergency powers. Emergency actions—pausing, freezing, halting—should be narrowly defined and limited to what's needed to stop an incident, not a backdoor to arbitrary control. Document what emergency powers exist, who can invoke them, and what they can and cannot do.

Quorum requirements and governance-attack mitigations for onchain governance: sensible proposal thresholds, voting delays and periods, and defenses against flash-loan-funded vote capture and other governance manipulation. Governance that can be borrowed for an afternoon is not a safeguard.

Incident response, already wired upThe worst time to figure out incident response is during an incident. The teams that handle exploits well—the ones that recover trust and that sometimes recover funds—are the ones that had a playbook before the call came in. At minimum, that means:

Real-time onchain monitoring and alerting. You can't respond to what you don't detect. Protocols should actively watch their own contracts for abnormal activity—anomalous withdrawals, unexpected price or balance movements, unusual call patterns, oracle deviations, sudden drops in reserves—with automated alerting that reaches an on-call human fast. Whether built in-house or through a monitoring provider, the goal is minutes to detection, not hours, and the ability to trigger a pause on the strength of an alert. Many of the worst outcomes in DeFi weren't caused by the exploit alone but by the hours that passed before anyone noticed.

A designated incident lead and a documented escalation path before anything has gone wrong. Every team member should know whom they call at 3 a.m. and what that person is empowered to do.

A preliminary incident report within roughly 48 hours of detection, documenting affected addresses, estimated losses, and preliminary root cause. This is for users, for the broader ecosystem, and for any partners who need to make decisions based on what happened.

A full post-mortem, published, with enough technical detail that other Stellar builders can learn from it. The temptation to bury an incident is real and we understand it; the long-term cost of doing so is much higher than the short-term embarrassment of being transparent.

Active cooperation with blockchain analytics firms and, where appropriate, law enforcement. Funds get recovered when the right people see the right transactions early.

A user restitution plan that the team can actually execute, including verified addresses, communication channels, and a clear timeline.

User transparencyEverything above is easier to trust when users can verify it. Much of DeFi still asks users to take a protocol's safety on faith—or to reconstruct it themselves from block explorers and GitHub. A protocol that accepts meaningful user funds should be able to point to a single place where an ordinary user, or a protocol composing with it, can see what's true. We'd like to see a public risk page—linked from the docs and the app—that consolidates:

The audit history, with links to the full published reports and the code versions they covered.

Known risks and current limitations, stated plainly. Every protocol has them; the trustworthy ones say so.

The privileged roles and upgrade paths that exist over the protocol, consistent with the governance documentation above.

External dependencies —the oracles, bridges, and off-chain services the protocol relies on—and what each one being wrong or compromised would mean for users.

The status of financial backstops, including the capital buffer and any insurance coverage, so users know what protection actually exists rather than assuming.

Incident history, including links to past post-mortems. A protocol that's been through an incident and handled it well has earned the right to show that.

None of this is exotic; it's the information users would need to make an informed decision, gathered in one place instead of scattered or withheld. Transparency is not just good practice—it's how an ecosystem builds the kind of trust that survives a bad day.

A note on decentralized protocolsSome of what's above assumes a team that can be identified and held accountable. Many of the best Stellar protocols are, or aspire to be, more decentralized than that. We see the tension, and we don't think it's a reason to lower the bar.

For decentralized protocols, the question is whether functionally equivalent controls exist. Governance processes that produce real accountability. Technical safeguards that don't depend on a person being on call. Treasury arrangements that survive contributor turnover. Transparency mechanisms that let users see what's true without having to take anyone's word for it. The form of the control may differ; the substance should not.

Where this goes from hereNone of this is a checklist we expect every protocol to satisfy on day one. Maturity takes time. New teams will be earlier on this curve than established ones, and that's appropriate. What we'd like to see is movement: every protocol on Stellar working visibly toward a higher standard, and a community where teams talk to each other about how to get there.

SDF will keep contributing to this in the ways we can: convening security roundtables, supporting access to recognized auditors for early-stage teams through our Audit Bank, publishing what we learn from incidents the ecosystem has lived through, and engaging with the broader DeFi security community on standards that work. We'd love to build these practices together with you. We also believe that any protocol that accepts meaningful user funds should be able to explain which controls are in place, which are missing, what risk that creates for users, and when the gaps will be closed.

If you're a builder on Stellar and you'd like to talk about how any of this applies to what you're working on, please reach out. The strongest DeFi ecosystem is one where these practices are normal, not exceptional. And we know Stellar is positioned to get there.
2026-07-20 20:55 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:50 26d ago
Pentair ALERT: Securities Fraud Investigation by Block & Leviton Could Allow PNR Investors to Recover Losses
PNR Pentair
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Boston, Massachusetts--(Newsfile Corp. - July 20, 2026) - Block & Leviton is investigating Pentair (NYSE: PNR) for potential securities law violations. Investors who have lost money in their Pentair investment should contact the firm to learn more about how they might recover those losses. For more details, visit https://blockleviton.com/cases/pnr.

What is this all about?

Block & Leviton is investigating whether Pentair plc and certain of its executives violated federal securities laws in connection with what the company told investors about the health of inventory in its Pool channel. On April 28, 2026, Pentair guided to roughly 1% second-quarter sales growth and 2-4% full-year growth, and management told investors it had evaluated a range of Pool revenue scenarios and reflected the expected sell-in pressure in that guidance. Then, after the market closed on July 14, 2026, Pentair pre-announced that preliminary second-quarter sales would be approximately $930 million — down about 17% year-over-year — and slashed its full-year outlook, attributing the shortfall to Pool channel inventory destocking that was "more pronounced" than previously estimated and that it estimated would cut full-year Pool sales by roughly $250 million. The company also disclosed that its chief financial officer had departed on July 10, 2026, just days before the warning, with the former CFO returning on an interim basis. Pentair shares fell sharply on the news.

Who is eligible?

Anyone who purchased Pentair common stock and has seen their shares fall may be eligible, whether or not they have sold their investment. Investors should contact Block & Leviton to learn more.

What is Block & Leviton doing?

Block & Leviton is investigating whether the Company committed securities law violations and may file an action to attempt to recover losses on behalf of investors who have lost money.

What should you do next?

If you've lost money on your investment, you should contact Block & Leviton to learn more via our case website, by email at [email protected], or by phone at (888) 256-2510.

Whistleblower?

If you have non-public information about Pentair, you should consider assisting in our investigation or working with our attorneys to file a report with the Securities Exchange Commission under their whistleblower program. Whistleblowers who provide original information to the SEC may receive rewards of up to 30% of any successful recovery. For more information, contact Block & Leviton at [email protected] or by phone at (888) 256-2510.

Why should you contact Block & Leviton?

Block & Leviton is widely regarded as one of the leading securities class action firms in the country. Our attorneys have recovered billions of dollars for defrauded investors and are dedicated to obtaining significant recoveries on behalf of our clients through active litigation in the federal courts across the country. Many of the nation's top institutional investors hire us to represent their interests. You can learn more about us at our website, www.blockleviton.com, call (888) 256-2510 or email [email protected] with any questions.

This notice may constitute attorney advertising.

CONTACT:
BLOCK & LEVITON LLP
260 Franklin St., Suite 1860
Boston, MA 02110
Phone: (888) 256-2510
Email: [email protected]

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305801

Source: Block & Leviton LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-20 20:54 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:45 26d ago
Cardinal Health expands home care business with two tuck-in acquisitions
CAH Cardinal Health
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Cardinal Health (NYSE: CAH) announced today it has entered into two definitive agreements that accelerate its at-Home Solutions' growth strategy.

Cardinal Health will acquire the Diabetes Health business of AdaptHealth Corp. (NASDAQ: AHCO), and, in its entirety, Strive Medical, a multi-specialty supply provider with a focus on urology. Combined, the transactions total approximately $360 million in cash, subject to working capital adjustments.

"These strategic transactions build on the synergies created by our recent investments in home care," said Jason Hollar, Chief Executive Officer, Cardinal Health. "As a natural extension of our at-Home Solutions growth strategy, they expand our enterprise-wide depth and breadth across important therapeutic categories like diabetes management and urology, further strengthening our leadership in a highly dynamic industry."

Both agreements enhance the framework established by Cardinal Health's most recent acquisition of Advanced Diabetes Supply (ADS). The company recently highlighted the progress of its at-Home Solutions business one year after its acquisition of ADS, including integration achievements that were realized ahead of plan. Since closing the original ADS transaction, the team successfully migrated all ADS volume onto the at-Home Solutions efficient and technology-enabled distribution network, onboarded nearly 500,000 new customers, and launched ContinuCare Pathway, a unique pharmacy-to-supplier digital referral pathway program.

"Our significant operational achievements in FY26 position us to continue building the country's leading platform to deliver simplified, innovative and high-quality care in the home, both organically and through acquisition," said Rob Schlissberg, President of Cardinal Health at-Home Solutions.

Layering these transactions on top of previous investments in the at-Home Solutions business also expands the company's ability to deliver high-quality service at scale. 

AdaptHealth's Diabetes Health business, which serves more than 225,000 people annually, operates primarily as a centralized, mail-order, direct-to-patient model that delivers supplies like continuous glucose monitors to support the ongoing management of diabetes.

Strive Medical serves more than 20,000 people annually as one of the nation's leading independent home medical supply providers specializing in urology, wound care, ostomy, and incontinence supplies, expanding Cardinal Health's enterprise-wide capabilities in this critical therapeutic area.  

These transactions are subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals, and are expected to be accretive to non-GAAP earnings per share in the first 12 months following close.  

Advisors
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC served as financial advisor to Cardinal Health on both acquisitions. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and DLA Piper served as legal advisors to Cardinal Health on the acquisition of AdaptHealth's diabetes business. BakerHostetler LLP and DLA Piper LLP served as legal advisors to Cardinal Health on the acquisition of Strive Medical.

About Cardinal Health  

Cardinal Health is a distributor of pharmaceuticals and specialty products; a global manufacturer and distributor of medical and laboratory products; a supplier of home-health and direct-to-patient products and services; an operator of nuclear pharmacies and manufacturing facilities; and a provider of performance and data solutions. Our company's customer-centric focus drives continuous improvement and leads to innovative solutions that improve people's lives every day. Learn more about Cardinal Health at cardinalhealth.com and in our Newsroom.

About AdaptHealth

AdaptHealth Corp. is a national leader in providing patient-centered, healthcare-at-home solutions, including home medical equipment (HME), medical supplies, and related services. Through its network of full-service medical equipment providers, AdaptHealth delivers tailored products and services designed to help patients manage chronic conditions and live independently in their homes. It serves beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance plans and reaches millions of patients annually.

About Strive Medical LLC

Strive Medical, an NMS Capital portfolio company, is a leading national durable medical equipment (DME) provider specializing in urology, incontinence, and wound care supplies delivered directly to patients. As an Accreditation Commission for Health Care (ACHC) accredited organization, Strive Medical manages the full insurance billing process – including Medicare, Medicaid, and over 5,000 private insurance plans – making access to essential supplies seamless for patients and referring providers alike. For more information, visit strivemedical.com

Contacts

Media: Cari Wildasinn, [email protected] and (614) 757-8287

Investors: David Frost, [email protected] and (614) 553-4460

Cautions Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements addressing expectations, prospects, estimates and other matters that are dependent upon future events or developments. These statements may be identified by words such as "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "will," "should," "could," "would," "project," "continue," "likely," and similar expressions, and include statements reflecting future results or guidance, statements of outlook, and various accruals and estimates. These matters are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied. These risks and uncertainties include risks associated with the planned acquisitions addressed in this release, including the risk that we may not receive required regulatory approval or otherwise fail to complete one or both of the acquisitions and the risk that we may fail to realize the anticipated strategic and financial benefits of the acquisitions. Cardinal Health is subject to additional risks and uncertainties described in Cardinal Health's Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K reports and exhibits to those reports. This news release reflects management's views as of July 20, 2026. Except to the extent required by applicable law, Cardinal Health undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are aspirational and not guarantees or promises that goals, targets or projections will be met, and no assurance can be given that any expectation, initiative or plan in this news release can or will be achieved or completed.

SOURCE Cardinal Health
2026-07-20 20:54 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:35 26d ago
How Seismic Scaled AI-Driven Prospecting Across Its Sales Team with ZoomInfo
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies
FMP Stock News
Original source text
VANCOUVER, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ZoomInfo (NASDAQ: GTM), the all-in-one AI GTM platform, has reported that Seismic, the global leader in sales enablement, scaled AI-assisted outbound prospecting across its go-to-market team on ZoomInfo, and in its own user surveys attributed 39% of active pipeline to opportunities identified or influenced by signals from ZoomInfo, according to the company. Seismic runs a well-developed outbound model, where business development representatives and outside sal.
2026-07-20 20:54 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:42 26d ago
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) Shareholders Who Lost Money Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Fraud Lawsuit
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP announces that investors with losses have opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit against ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. ("ZoomInfo" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: GTM).

IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR ZOOMINFO INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE BEFORE AUGUST 24, 2026 (LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE) TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT

What Is The Lawsuit About? 
The complaint filed alleges that, between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) ZoomInfo's optimistic plan for continued growth was undermined by slowing seat-based demand, weakening upsells and customers revising decisions to purchase AI products and develop internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions, making ZoomInfo's 2026 full year revenue guidance increasingly unlikely to be met; and (2) as a result, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More: 
If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us.
Charles Linehan, Esq.,
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100,
Los Angeles California 90067
Email:  [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150 (Toll-Free: 888-773-9224)
Visit our website at www.glancylaw.com.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.

If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.  

To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Contact Us: 
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,  
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100,
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Charles Linehan
Email:  [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at: www.glancylaw.com.

SOURCE Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP
2026-07-20 20:54 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:00 26d ago
Tegus Cuts Conversation Intelligence Spend 50% by Consolidating Its Tech Stack with ZoomInfo
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies
FMP Stock News
Original source text
VANCOUVER, Wash.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--ZoomInfo (NASDAQ: GTM), the all-in-one AI GTM platform, has reported that Tegus, an investment-research platform that investors rely on to inform their decisions, cut its conversation-intelligence spending by 50% compared with its previous vendor after consolidating that work onto ZoomInfo, according to the company. Tegus redirected the savings into sales incentives and went on to exceed its targets for the next 2 quarters. Tegus combines expert insights, comp.
2026-07-20 20:54 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:03 26d ago
GTM EQUITY ACTION REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds ZoomInfo Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on August 24, 2026
ZI ZoomInfo Technologies
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In ZoomInfo To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in ZoomInfo between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 20, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. ("ZoomInfo" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: GTM) and reminds investors of the August 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that the true state of ZoomInfo's slowing growth its legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. Further, the Company minimized concerns that customers were moving towards consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions.

On May 11, 2026, after the market closed, ZoomInfo announced its first quarter 2026 financial results, unveiling a sharp decline in growth outlook and accordingly lowered its 2026 full year financial guidance, and announced it was realigning its downmarket business, laying off 20% of its workforce, and expecting to incur approximately $45-60 million in restructuring costs. On this news, ZoomInfo's stock price fell $1.98, or approximately 33%, to close at $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding ZoomInfo's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the ZoomInfo class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/GTM or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the ZoomInfo Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the ZoomInfo securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) and certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements to investors during the class period. Specifically, the complaint alleges that defendants issued overwhelmingly positive statements while allegedly concealing the true extent of slowing growth in ZoomInfo's legacy seat-based subscription platforms and weakening customer retention in its downmarket segment. The complaint further alleges that defendants minimized concerns that customers were shifting toward consumption-based usage models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions, which allegedly masked material adverse trends affecting the Company's business. On May 11, 2026, after markets closed, ZoomInfo allegedly disclosed the severity of these conditions when it announced sharply lowered full-year 2026 guidance, a realignment of its downmarket business, a workforce reduction of approximately 20%, and anticipated restructuring costs of approximately $45-60 million — news that allegedly caused the Company's stock to decline approximately 33% the following trading day.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities during the class period — between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026, inclusive — may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit. Eligible investors are not limited to those who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any class member who suffered losses during the class period may potentially share in any recovery obtained on behalf of the class. Investors are encouraged to review their trading records to determine whether their purchases fall within the applicable class period dates. Participation in the litigation does not require that an investor take an active role in the case or incur out-of-pocket legal expenses to be considered a potential class member.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including selecting and overseeing class counsel and making key strategic decisions in the case. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, any investor who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies securities during the class period and suffered a loss may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff. The deadline to file a motion seeking lead plaintiff appointment is August 24, 2026. Importantly, investors are not required to serve as lead plaintiff in order to be eligible to share in any recovery that may result from the litigation; the vast majority of class members participate without taking on that representative role.

What should investors do if they purchased ZoomInfo stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased ZoomInfo Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) securities between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026 should promptly review their brokerage and account records to confirm the dates and prices of any relevant transactions. Investors are strongly encouraged to preserve all documentation related to their ZoomInfo securities purchases, including trade confirmations, account statements, and any communications concerning those investments. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is August 24, 2026, investors who wish to explore their legal options — including the possibility of seeking appointment as lead plaintiff — should act in a timely manner. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP or other qualified securities counsel to evaluate their rights and potential claims prior to that deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased ZoomInfo securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305843

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us
2026-07-20 20:53 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:05 26d ago
Workhorse Reports Inducement Grants under NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4)
WKHS Workhorse Group
FMP Stock News
Original source text
July 20, 2026 16:05 ET  | Source: Workhorse Group, Inc.

DETROIT, July 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Workhorse Group Inc. (NASDAQ: WKHS) (“Workhorse” or the “Company”), a North American OEM and provider of all-electric trucks, step vans, shuttles and buses, today announced that on July 20, 2026, the Human Resource Management and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) granted 93,750 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to Jody Davis under the Company’s Inducement Equity Award Plan (the “Inducement Plan”) in connection with Mr. Davis’s hiring and appointment as Chief Financial Officer. The award was granted as an inducement material to Mr. Davis entering into employment with the Company in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c)(4).  

The RSUs will vest over a three-year period, in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of June 1, 2026, subject to Mr. Davis’s continued employment with the Company through the applicable vesting dates.

About Workhorse Group Inc.

Headquartered in the Detroit area with a commercial-scale manufacturing plant in Union City, Indiana, Workhorse (Nasdaq: WKHS) is redefining what a medium-duty truck should be. Workhorse builds software-first, electric trucks, shuttles and buses that are powerful, cost-efficient, reliable, safe and comfortable — all with zero tailpipe emissions. Our deep experience building electric vehicles at scale drives intentional innovations designed to help customers lower operating costs, improve fleet performance, enhance the driver experience, and maximize uptime without compromise. More information is available at www.workhorse.com.

Media Relations Contacts:

Workhorse
John Williams, Communications
+1-206-660-5503, [email protected]

ICR, Inc.
[email protected]

Investor Relations Contact:
[email protected]

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained in this press release that are not historical facts, including those regarding the Company's achievement of its priorities and its other plans, objectives, expectations, business strategies, future operations, financial performance, prospects, and other future events or developments, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations, assumptions, and estimates as of the date of this press release and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. These risks and uncertainties are described in greater detail under the caption "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 13:25 26d ago
Chainlink is now the official data oracle and cross-chain infrastructure for United Stables
BNB BNB LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Chainlink Steps In as Core Infrastructure for United Stables@Chainlink has been named the official data oracle and cross-chain infrastructure provider for @UTechStables, with the partnership aimed at broadening the reach of the $U stablecoin across decentralised finance on @BNBCHAIN.

The move gives the $U ecosystem access to Chainlink's price feeds, cross-chain messaging, and interoperability tooling. For a stablecoin focused on unified liquidity, reliable and tamper-resistant data infrastructure is a core requirement. Chainlink's network has enabled tens of trillions in transaction value and underpins a large share of DeFi activity globally.

What United Stables Is Building With $UAccording to BNB Chain, $U is the first stablecoin on BNB Chain to adopt a stablecoin-inclusive reserve model, allowing USD-backed stablecoins such as USDT, USDC, and USD1 to be used directly as minting collateral. The approach consolidates existing liquidity rather than competing for it. Crypto Briefing reports that $U is deployed on both BNB Smart Chain and Ethereum, offering immediate multi-chain access from launch.

All reserves are held in segregated accounts, verified through on-chain Proof-of-Reserve, and subject to independent quarterly audits. From day one, $U integrates with DeFi protocols including PancakeSwap, Aster, Four.meme, and ListaDAO, covering trading, liquidity provision, staking, and lending.

The Chainlink integration positions @UTechStables to scale $U across protocols within the BNB Chain ecosystem and, over time, beyond it. BNB Chain's total stablecoin supply has doubled to approximately $14 billion, and the network has consistently led all blockchains in monthly active addresses and transaction count for stablecoins. The Chainlink partnership gives $U the infrastructure backbone to compete in that growing market.

Sources
BNB Chain Blog: United Stables Launches $U as a Native Stablecoin on BNB Chain
Crypto Briefing: U Stablecoin Launches on BNB Chain and Ethereum
GlobeNewswire: $U Stablecoin Launches on BNB Chain and Ethereum by United Stables
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:21 26d ago
Spain’s World Cup homecoming draws a million fans to Madrid, and crypto is along for the ride
LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Spain’s national football team touched down in Madrid on July 20 at approximately 2:30 p.m. local time, fresh off a 1-0 World Cup final victory over Argentina. An estimated one million fans packed Plaza de Cibeles to greet them. Head coach Luis de la Fuente and captain Rodri hoisted the trophy above the crowd.

Ferran Torres scored the only goal in the 106th minute of extra time. But beyond the confetti and the open-top bus, this World Cup has quietly become the most crypto-integrated global sporting event in history, and Spain’s triumph is sending ripples through digital asset markets.

The crypto infrastructure behind the 2026 World Cup Kraken became FIFA’s Official Crypto Exchange Supporter on June 9, 2026, marking the first time the governing body of world football entered into an official crypto partnership.

Advertisement

Chainlink provided oracle services that powered prediction markets covering all 104 matches in the expanded tournament format. Chainlink’s technology served as the trusted data bridge that let decentralized prediction platforms verify real-world match results on-chain, allowing bettors and participants to settle positions without relying on a centralized intermediary.

Chiliz is the blockchain infrastructure company that operates fan-token platforms for major European clubs, including several Spanish teams. Fan tokens are digital assets that give holders voting rights on minor club decisions and access to exclusive perks.

Why Spain’s win matters for fan tokens Spain’s victory is expected to create a surge in activity around CHZ-linked assets and tokens tied to major Spanish clubs. The players who just won the World Cup play for Barcelona, Real Madrid, and other clubs that sit at the center of the European fan-token ecosystem.

Institutional implications and what to watch Kraken’s FIFA partnership establishes a template for similar deals across other global sporting events. Each partnership normalizes crypto in front of audiences that might never visit a DeFi protocol but who will notice that a crypto brand is printed on their stadium cup.

For investors watching the fan-token space specifically, the key metric to track over the coming weeks is whether trading volumes for Spanish club tokens sustain elevated levels or revert quickly to pre-tournament baselines.

Chainlink processing oracle data for 104 matches is a real-world stress test for decentralized data feeds. Kraken occupying prime sponsorship real estate at the world’s biggest sporting event is a distribution channel for crypto awareness. And Chiliz sitting at the center of a fan-token ecosystem that just received a major catalyst from Spain’s victory is positioned to capture whatever spending follows.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 18:00 26d ago
Why Chainlink’s $32.6M whale move could shape LINK’s push toward $9
LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News
Original source text
A transfer involving 3.89 million Chainlink [LINK] worth $32.58 million drew fresh attention to Chainlink after Whale Alert flagged the transaction. The tokens moved from a Coinbase Institutional wallet to an unknown wallet, encouraging speculation about strategic positioning among large holders rather than immediate exchange selling. 

Such transfers often reflect changes in custody or portfolio management rather than outright distribution. However, the movement still highlighted growing institutional participation around LINK. 

Large transactions frequently influence market sentiment because traders monitor them for signs of accumulation or distribution. As a result, the transfer placed Chainlink back on investors’ watchlists while the market assessed whether whale activity would support the ongoing recovery.

Exchange inflows returned after months of out flows Chainlink’s spot netflows shifted into positive territory after recording an inflow of approximately $620.18K. 

The change marked a notable departure from the prolonged period of exchange outflows that had previously reduced available selling supply. Positive netflows indicate that more tokens reached exchanges than left them during the latest session. 

However, the relatively modest inflow suggested that exchange-bound supply remained limited instead of overwhelming the market. Even so, the latest reading reflected a change in short-term market behavior, making exchange activity an important metric for assessing LINK’s next directional move.

Source: CoinGlass Can bearish futures sentiment derail LINK’s recovery? Derivatives traders maintained a cautious stance despite improving activity in the spot market. 

At press time, the 90-day Futures Taker CVD remained seller-dominant, indicating that aggressive market participants continued executing more sell orders than buy orders. 

This imbalance suggested bearish conviction persisted among leveraged traders even as institutional wallet activity attracted attention. However, the divergence between spot positioning and futures activity created uncertainty around LINK’s short-term outlook. 

Spot participants appeared willing to absorb supply, while futures traders continued favoring downside exposure. Such contrasting behavior often preceded stronger volatility because either buyers eventually overwhelmed sellers or derivatives sentiment pulled prices lower.

Source: CryptoQuant Chainlink tests resistance as RSI continues improving At the time of press, Chainlink [LINK] traded around $8.35 after extending its recovery from the $7.00 support region. 

Buyers reclaimed the $8.18 level and pushed the price toward immediate resistance near $8.35, although that area continued limiting further advances. 

A successful break above this zone would likely expose $9.00, while sustained buying could later bring $10.00 into focus. However, rejection at current levels could encourage another retest of $8.18 before buyers attempted another advance. 

Meanwhile, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) climbed to 57.71 as of writing, remaining above its Moving Average near 54.58. The indicator reflected strengthening buying pressure without entering overbought territory. 

As a result, the technical structure favored continued recovery, provided buyers reclaim nearby resistance with stronger participation.

Source: TradingView To conclude, institutional wallet activity increased attention around Chainlink, while spot netflows shifted back into positive territory. However, seller-dominant futures positioning continued to signal caution. 

If buyers clear the $8.35 resistance, LINK would likely challenge $9.00 next. Otherwise, another pullback toward $8.18 would remain the more likely short-term outcome.

Final Summary Institutional wallet activity increased, while positive netflows reflected more LINK returning to exchanges. LINK approached a key resistance, but bearish futures traders continued limiting the recovery.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 18:09 26d ago
Chainlink powers instant payouts for prediction markets at the 2026 FIFA World Cup
LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Prediction markets just got their biggest stage yet. Chainlink has been named the exclusive oracle infrastructure behind ADI Predictstreet, the official prediction market partner of the FIFA World Cup 2026, enabling near-instant settlement and automated payouts across every single match of the tournament.

That’s 104 matches, 48 teams, 16 host cities across North America, and a projected audience north of 6 billion fans.

How it works under the hood The integration relies on Chainlink’s Runtime Environment, or CRE. CRE is the framework that lets Chainlink automate the entire lifecycle of a prediction market, from creating the bet to resolving it to settling payouts, without any human middleman touching the process.

Every market on the Myriad platform will pull verified FIFA data through Chainlink’s oracle network. When a match ends, the result flows through the oracle, triggers the smart contract, and pays out winners. No waiting for manual verification. No disputed outcomes sitting in limbo while some back-office team reviews footage.

Advertisement

The technical architecture here matters because prediction markets live and die on trust. Chainlink’s oracle network has been the backbone of decentralized finance for years, having facilitated over $30 trillion in transaction value across DeFi protocols.

Why FIFA, and why now The 2026 World Cup is a uniquely massive event. It’s the first tournament to feature 48 teams, up from 32 in previous editions. It’s spread across the US, Canada, and Mexico. And the sheer volume of matches, 104 in total, creates an enormous surface area for prediction market activity.

Every data point feeding into the smart contract is verifiable on-chain. Every payout logic is encoded before the match starts. There’s no house discretion on edge cases, no terms-of-service clause that lets a platform claw back winnings.

Chainlink Labs executives emphasized that this partnership establishes new industry standards for sports prediction markets, aiming to integrate decentralized oracle technology into the mainstream sports betting ecosystem.

What this means for LINK and the broader market From an investor perspective, this partnership is one of the highest-profile real-world use cases Chainlink has landed. The LINK token’s value proposition has always been tied to network usage: more protocols and platforms using Chainlink oracles means more demand for the token that secures the network.

Industry analysts predict substantial network effects that could drive increased on-chain activity for the LINK token, although initial reports on direct price impacts remain sparse.

There are risks worth flagging. Regulatory scrutiny around prediction markets varies wildly by jurisdiction, and a FIFA-branded product will attract attention from regulators who might otherwise ignore smaller platforms.

Traders should keep an eye on on-chain metrics for LINK during the tournament window, specifically transaction counts and unique callers to Chainlink’s CRE contracts.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 19:28 26d ago
Chainlink supply keeps draining off exchanges
LINK Chainlink
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Exchange supply falls 12% in a monthMore than 15.7 million $LINK left centralized exchanges over the past month, a 12% drop in the supply parked on trading venues, according to on-chain analytics firm @SantimentData. On Sunday alone, a further 1.04 million tokens exited exchanges in a single day.

The key metric here is the Exchange Flow Balance, which measures the net amount of $LINK flowing into or out of wallets connected to centralized exchanges. When the indicator sits below zero, outflows dominate, a trend that can signal investor accumulation rather than selling pressure. The sustained negative reading means fewer coins are sitting ready to sell, compressing the readily available supply on the market.

DTCC goes live with Chainlink at the centerThe supply shift arrives during a significant month for @chainlink's institutional credentials. On July 15, 2026, @The_DTCC processed its first live production trades using tokenized versions of DTC-held assets, calling it its largest tokenization production event by breadth of assets, use cases, and participants. Live trades covered tokenized stocks, ETFs, and U.S. Treasuries, with the tokenized versions preserving the same legal ownership rights as the underlying securities.

The initiative involved over 30 major financial institutions, including BlackRock, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and Vanguard. The driving force behind the transactions was Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) and Runtime Environment (CRE). JPMorgan posted tokenized shares of the Invesco QQQ Trust ETF as collateral to meet margin requirements at CME Group.

DTC secured a No-Action Letter from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission before the pilot began, authorizing it to operate a tokenization service for real-world assets it custodies, meaning the July trades ran as regulated production activity rather than a sandbox test. DTCC now plans to open the service more broadly in October 2026, expanding eligible participants and asset classes.

The pairing of shrinking exchange supply and a growing institutional footprint points to holders positioning around utility rather than an exit. Whether that dynamic translates into price momentum will depend on how broadly the DTCC service scales and how deeply @chainlink becomes embedded in the next phase of Wall Street's tokenization push.

Sources
CoinDesk: DTCC moves tokenized securities into live trading
Crypto Briefing: Chainlink orchestrates live trade with JPMorgan's tokenized stock collateral
Tradeweb: DTCC turns tokenization into reality
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 12:30 26d ago
Coinbase adds support for CRCL, HOOD, and MSTR perpetual futures
USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Coinbase is rolling out perpetual futures contracts for Circle Internet Group (CRCL), Robinhood Markets (HOOD), and MicroStrategy (MSTR), with trading set to go live on or after 9:00 am UTC on July 21, 2026.

What’s actually launching The new contracts will be available to eligible non-US customers, consistent with Coinbase’s existing approach to its stock perpetual futures product. Traders can access up to 10x leverage on single-stock contracts, meaning a $1,000 position can control $10,000 worth of exposure.

All three contracts are cash-settled in USDC, Circle’s dollar-pegged stablecoin. That detail is worth noting given that CRCL, Circle’s own stock ticker, is one of the assets being listed. Coinbase is essentially letting traders speculate on the issuer of the settlement currency using the settlement currency itself.

The 24/7 trading window is a meaningful differentiator from traditional equity markets. When a major Bitcoin move happens at 2 am on a Sunday, holders of MSTR perpetuals can react immediately rather than waiting for Monday’s opening bell.

Advertisement

Why these three stocks matter MicroStrategy, under Michael Saylor’s leadership, has become the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, essentially transforming itself into a leveraged Bitcoin proxy.

Robinhood has steadily built out its crypto business, becoming one of the primary on-ramps for retail traders entering the digital asset space. The company’s revenue is increasingly tied to crypto trading volumes.

Circle Internet Group, the company behind USDC, went public and represents a pure-play bet on stablecoin adoption. CRCL saw a 5.5% gain in a single trading session amid Bitcoin’s strength earlier in 2026.

Coinbase’s bigger derivatives play This launch builds on groundwork Coinbase laid in March 2026, when it first introduced stock perpetual futures for non-US users. Adding CRCL, HOOD, and MSTR is the next step in that rollout.

The timing aligns with a period of significant momentum for crypto-linked equities. Bitcoin surpassed $80,000 earlier in 2026, with companies like MicroStrategy and Circle seeing their stock prices respond accordingly.

What this means for traders and investors In traditional equity markets, standard margin accounts typically offer 2x leverage, with portfolio margin sometimes stretching to 4x or more for qualified investors. At 10x, these perpetuals sit closer to the leverage profiles found on crypto-native platforms.

One risk to watch: the correlation between these stocks and Bitcoin can break down during periods of company-specific stress. A regulatory action against Circle, a Robinhood earnings miss, or a change in MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin strategy could decouple these assets from broader crypto trends, catching leveraged traders off guard.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 13:08 26d ago
The systemic risk exception: how SVB saved USDC by accident
USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Crypto has been rescued by the US government exactly once, and the rescue was aimed at something else. The mechanism was an obscure override in banking law, and understanding how it worked in March 2023, and why it may never work that way again, is the closest thing to reading crypto’s actual safety net

Summary

The systemic risk exception is an override in US banking law: normally the FDIC must resolve failed banks at the least cost to its insurance fund, but with extraordinary sign-offs it may spend more to prevent broader financial instability. Invoking it requires a two-thirds vote of the FDIC board, a two-thirds vote of the Federal Reserve board, and the Treasury secretary’s determination in consultation with the president, one of the highest procedural bars in financial regulation. In March 2023 it was invoked for Silicon Valley Bank, making all depositors whole including the uninsured, at a cost to the insurance fund of roughly $16 billion to $17 billion, recovered through special assessments on banks. Circle held $3.3 billion of USDC reserves at SVB; the coin fell to roughly 87 cents over the weekend and recovered when the depositor guarantee landed. Crypto’s only bailout was a side effect of a banking rescue. The channel is narrowing by design: issuers moved reserves away from bank deposits, and watchdogs now warn that a future exception covering a bank heavy with stablecoin reserves could cost more than SVB did, which is exactly why regulators want the exposure shrunk. For one weekend in March 2023, the second-largest stablecoin in the world traded like a distressed bond. USDC, marketed as a dollar in digital form, touched roughly 87 cents, because $3.3 billion of the reserves behind it were trapped inside a bank that had just failed. By Monday morning the peg was back, and the crypto industry drew a comforting conclusion: when things get bad enough, the government steps in. The conclusion is half right and dangerously incomplete. The government did step in, through a mechanism called the systemic risk exception, and it was not stepping in for crypto. Understanding what that mechanism is, the extraordinary process it requires, what it actually did that weekend, and why the same rescue is being engineered out of repeatability, is the closest thing available to an honest map of crypto’s safety net. This guide is that map.

The rule the exception overrides The systemic risk exception only makes sense against the rule it breaks, and the rule is a scar from an earlier crisis.

After the savings-and-loan disaster of the 1980s drained the deposit insurance system, Congress passed the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, and at its center sat a discipline called least-cost resolution. When a bank fails, the FDIC must choose the resolution path that costs its Deposit Insurance Fund the least. In practice that usually means insured depositors are paid in full, up to the statutory limit, and uninsured depositors, everyone above the limit, stand in line as creditors of the receivership, recovering whatever the failed bank’s assets eventually yield. The rule exists to make large depositors police their banks: if money above the insurance cap is genuinely at risk, sophisticated customers have reasons to watch where they keep it, and banks that take wild risks lose big deposits before they blow up.

Congress knew the discipline could occasionally be catastrophic, a failure large enough or connected enough that letting uninsured depositors take losses would spread panic to healthy banks. So it built one exit: the systemic risk exception, permitting the FDIC to abandon least-cost and protect broader classes of creditors, including all uninsured depositors, when the cheap path would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions or financial stability.

Then it made the exit door heavy. Invoking the exception requires a written recommendation by two-thirds of the FDIC’s board, a matching two-thirds of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, and a determination by the Treasury secretary made in consultation with the president, with after-the-fact accountability including review of the determination. Three institutions, supermajorities in two, and the White House in the loop: American financial law contains few switches harder to flip, which is the point. The exception is designed to be used the way it reads, exceptionally.

March 2023: the weekend it flipped Silicon Valley Bank failed on Friday, March 10, 2023, in the fastest large-bank run in American history, tens of billions of withdrawal demands in a day, driven at smartphone speed by a depositor base of startups and funds that all read the same warnings at the same time. The failure’s signature problem was concentration above the cap: the overwhelming majority of SVB’s deposits were uninsured, held by companies that used the bank for payroll and treasury. Under least-cost resolution, those depositors faced haircuts of unknown size and timing, and by Saturday the question consuming regulators was not SVB but Monday: whether uninsured depositors at every similar bank would conclude their money was unsafe and run next.

Among those uninsured depositors was Circle, with $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves, roughly 8% of the total, on deposit at SVB. The disclosure landed Friday night, and the stablecoin market did the arithmetic instantly: if the SVB money took, say, a 20% haircut, the coin was worth visibly less than a dollar. USDC broke, trading down to roughly 87 cents, redemption queues formed, and the depeg transmitted through DeFi, where USDC served as core collateral and as backing for other stablecoins, turning one bank’s failure into a system-wide crypto stress test in under 48 hours. For readers new to the mechanics, crypto.news has also explained the anatomy of the USDC break.

On Sunday evening, the switch flipped. The FDIC and Federal Reserve boards voted, the Treasury secretary determined, and the government announced that all SVB depositors, insured and uninsured alike, would have full access to their money Monday morning, with the identical treatment applied to the simultaneously failed Signature Bank. The Fed added the Fed authority this is often confused with, a new broad lending facility so other banks could borrow against securities at face value rather than fire-selling them. Crucially, the announcement drew a line: depositors were protected, while shareholders and certain bondholders of the failed banks were wiped out, this was a depositor guarantee, not a rescue of the banks as firms. The cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund from protecting uninsured depositors, later tallied around $16 billion to $17 billion, was recovered the way the statute prescribes, through special assessments levied on the banking industry.

USDC’s peg was restored by Monday. Circle’s $3.3 billion was simply there again, whole, because Circle was a depositor and every depositor had been made whole.

Reading the rescue correctly Everything important about this episode lives in the details the celebratory version skips.

The decision-makers were not looking at crypto. The systemic risk determination was about the American regional banking system: the fear that uninsured depositors at dozens of healthy-enough banks would run on Monday, converting one failure into a cascade. USDC’s exposure appeared in the weekend’s inputs mainly as evidence of how far SVB’s depositor base reached, not as an object of policy. The stablecoin was rescued the way a car parked next to a burning building is saved by the fire department: thoroughly, and incidentally.

The mechanism could not have reached crypto directly even if regulators had wanted it to. The exception overrides least-cost resolution of a failed insured bank; it has no application to a failing stablecoin issuer, which is not a bank, holds no insured deposits, and sits entirely outside the FDIC’s resolution machinery. Had the causality run the other way, Circle failing with SVB healthy, there was no switch to flip. The one rescue in crypto’s history worked only because the point of failure happened to be inside the traditional perimeter.

And the episode cut both ways for the industry’s reputation. It proved the deepest link between how reserves connect coins to banks and banking, and it showed regulators exactly what that link costs: a coin’s stability had become an unpriced pass-through of a bank’s uninsured-deposit risk, and the public backstop had absorbed it by accident. Nobody in Washington filed that under precedent to repeat. They filed it under exposure to close.

A note on scale completes the picture, because the exception’s economics are part of why its future use is contested. The Deposit Insurance Fund that absorbed the roughly $16 billion to $17 billion cost is not taxpayer money in the direct sense; it is funded by assessments on insured banks, and the special assessment that recouped the SVB and Signature costs was levied, by design, disproportionately on the largest banks. That structure is why the banking industry itself is a stakeholder in how the exception gets used: every invocation is a bill sent to banks that did nothing wrong, which is both the system’s discipline, the industry insures itself, and the source of its political friction. Now scale the stablecoin version. The sector’s reserves exceed $300 billion, and even a fraction of a major issuer’s backing sitting as deposits at one failing bank could produce an uninsured-depositor guarantee dwarfing 2023’s, with the cost assessed on banks to protect, in economic substance, the customers of a non-bank competitor that pays no assessments at all. That asymmetry, banks funding the accidental backstop of an industry built to disintermediate them, is the sharpest version of the Better Markets warning, and it explains the otherwise puzzling alliance of bank lobbies and consumer watchdogs pressing regulators to keep stablecoin reserves out of bank deposits. The exception’s door is heavy, and the parties who pay when it opens are now watching what stands outside it.

The weekend, hour by hour The compressed timeline of March 10 to 13, 2023 is worth walking in sequence, because the mechanics of how a bank failure became a stablecoin crisis and back again are clearest at ground level, and because the sequence is the template for reading any future episode.

Friday, March 10. California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank mid-morning and appointed the FDIC receiver, the standard Friday choreography of American bank failure, except at unprecedented speed and size for the era. The default path was least-cost resolution: insured depositors whole within days, uninsured depositors, the vast majority at SVB, issued receivership certificates for the excess, of uncertain value and timing. Through the afternoon, the exposure disclosures began. Circle’s landed that evening: $3.3 billion of USDC reserves at the failed bank.

Saturday. The stablecoin market traded the disclosure. USDC broke decisively below its peg, reaching roughly 87 cents, and the mechanics of the depeg mattered as much as its size: redemptions through Circle were constrained by the banking system being closed for the weekend, so price discovery happened entirely on secondary markets, in an information vacuum, with holders unable to distinguish a weekend liquidity discount from a genuine solvency haircut. The stress propagated through DeFi, where USDC collateralized lending markets and backed other stablecoins, notably DAI, which depegged in sympathy. A crypto-native observer watching only crypto saw a stablecoin crisis; the actual variable was a receivership in Santa Clara.

Sunday, March 12. The systemic machinery engaged, aimed at Monday’s banking open, not at crypto. The FDIC and Federal Reserve boards delivered their supermajority recommendations, the Treasury secretary made the determination in consultation with the president, and the announcement guaranteed all depositors of SVB and Signature Bank, with shareholders and certain debtholders wiped out. Simultaneously the Fed unveiled its new broad lending facility for banks, term funding against securities at par, the modern 13(3)-era answer to fire sales. Circle communicated that its exposure would be recovered in full and that the peg would restore when banking rails reopened.

Monday, March 13. Depositors had access. Circle’s $3.3 billion was whole, redemptions resumed through functioning banks, and USDC returned to parity within the day. Total elapsed time from failure to restoration: roughly 65 hours, most of them a weekend.

Read as a template, the sequence teaches four things. Stablecoin depegs driven by reserve exposure trade on disclosure and rumor while the actual determinants, receivership outcomes, official decisions, move on institutional time, so weekend prices are sentiment, not settlement. The transmission runs through whatever fraction of reserves sits at the failed institution, which is why the single most predictive number in any repeat is the issuer’s disclosed bank-deposit concentration. The rescue decision, when it came, was made by banking regulators weighing banking contagion, with crypto’s fate a dependent variable, and any future episode should be read the same way: watch what the FDIC and Fed fear for banks, not what they say about crypto. And the entire arc, break to restoration, required the failure to sit inside the insured perimeter, which is the fact every subsequent reform has been quietly working to make irrelevant.

Why the accident is being engineered out Three developments since March 2023 have narrowed the accidental-bailout channel, and each is worth registering because together they answer the question every holder actually cares about: would it work that way again?

Reserves moved. The proximate lesson issuers drew was that concentrated uninsured bank deposits are the weak joint, and reserve portfolios restructured accordingly, toward Treasury bills, government money market funds, and custody arrangements, with bank deposits reduced to operational cash. The GENIUS Act hardened the direction into law with full-reserve requirements in high-quality liquid assets. The less reserve money sits as uninsured deposits, the less a bank failure can transmit into a peg, and the less a future depositor guarantee would have any stablecoin to save.

The watchdogs did the arithmetic. Better Markets and others have warned that a future systemic risk exception covering a bank holding a major issuer’s reserves could cost the insurance fund more than SVB’s roughly $17 billion, socializing a stablecoin’s back end across assessed banks at a scale the 2023 episode only sketched. That warning is the political immune response to the accident: the argument now on the table is precisely that stablecoin reserve exposure should not be allowed to grow into something the exception would one day be pressured to cover.

And the doctrine hardened. The Fed chair who owned crypto just ruled out saving it, while the FDIC has separately confirmed that stablecoin holders have no deposit insurance of their own, no pass-through, no coverage, a creditor’s claim on the issuer and nothing more. Crypto.news has also examined why holders had no direct protection. The official architecture being built instead, GENIUS’s holder-priority rule and reserve requirements, is a resolution regime: machinery for letting an issuer fail in an orderly way, which is the exact opposite of machinery for rescuing one. The unfinished state of that rulebook, after regulators missed July’s statutory deadline, is the honest asterisk on the whole structure.

The synthesis is clean enough to carry. The systemic risk exception remains on the books, as heavy-doored as ever, and it protects one thing: depositors of failed insured banks, when three institutions and the White House agree that letting them take losses would endanger the system. Stablecoins touched that protection once, through a $3.3 billion accident of account location, and the years since have been a coordinated project, by issuers, by Congress, by regulators, to make sure the next stablecoin crisis is resolved inside crypto’s own machinery rather than caught in banking’s net. Whether that machinery is finished when the test comes is the open question of 2026, and it is the right one to watch, because the fire department has now said clearly which building it covers.

Frequently asked questions What is the systemic risk exception in one sentence? It is the override in US banking law that lets the FDIC abandon its normal obligation to resolve a failed bank at the least cost to the insurance fund, and instead protect broader groups such as all uninsured depositors, when the cheap path would threaten financial stability.

Who has to approve it? Three parties, at one of the highest bars in financial regulation: at least two-thirds of the FDIC’s board, at least two-thirds of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors, and the Treasury secretary, who makes the determination in consultation with the president. The multi-institution supermajority design exists to keep the exception truly exceptional.

What happened with Silicon Valley Bank in 2023? SVB failed on March 10, 2023 after the fastest major bank run in US history, with the vast majority of its deposits above the insurance limit. Fearing Monday runs on similar banks, regulators invoked the exception on Sunday and guaranteed all depositors, insured and uninsured, at SVB and Signature Bank, while wiping out shareholders. The uninsured-depositor protection cost the insurance fund roughly $16 billion to $17 billion, recovered via special assessments on banks.

How did that rescue USDC? Circle held $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves, about 8%, as deposits at SVB. When the failure was disclosed, USDC fell to roughly 87 cents as markets priced a possible haircut on that exposure. The depositor guarantee made Circle whole along with every other depositor, and the peg recovered by Monday. USDC was saved as a depositor of a rescued bank, not as a stablecoin.

Could the exception be used to rescue a stablecoin issuer directly? No. The mechanism applies to the resolution of failed insured banks, and a stablecoin issuer is not a bank and holds no insured deposits. If an issuer failed while its reserve banks stayed healthy, the exception would have nothing to attach to. The 2023 episode worked only because the point of failure sat inside the traditional banking perimeter.

Why might it not work the same way next time? Because the channel is being closed from three directions. Issuers moved reserves out of uninsured bank deposits into Treasury bills, government money funds, and custody, so a bank failure transmits less into any peg. Watchdogs such as Better Markets warn that covering a reserve-heavy bank could cost more than SVB did, building political resistance. And regulators, including the Fed chair this month, have explicitly disclaimed crypto rescues while constructing a resolution regime instead.

What protects stablecoin holders now, if not this? Under the GENIUS Act: full reserves in high-quality liquid assets and a priority rule paying stablecoin holders ahead of other creditors in an issuer’s failure, a strong first claim on the reserve pool. Holders have no deposit insurance and no pass-through coverage, as the FDIC has confirmed. The implementing rules for the new regime remain unfinished after agencies missed the July 2026 statutory deadline, which is the main open risk in the structure.

What should someone watch to judge the safety net today? Three things. Reserve disclosures, specifically how much of an issuer’s backing still sits as bank deposits versus Treasuries and government funds. The GENIUS rulemaking’s completion, since holder priority is only as fast and certain as the redemption and resolution mechanics behind it. And official rhetoric under stress: whether the next mid-sized crypto failure is actually allowed to fail, which is the only true test of the no-rescue doctrine. This is educational information, not financial advice.

Disclaimer: This article is for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. It describes past official actions and current law, neither of which guarantees any future action, and regulatory details remain subject to change. Always do your own research. Information is accurate as of July 20, 2026.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 14:32 26d ago
A Hyperliquid whale staked 115,000 HYPE tokens today after earning over $1 million in profit.
HYPE Hyperliquid USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News
Original source text
According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a Hyperliquid whale carried out new on-chain operations today after earning over $1 million in profits, staking 115,000 HYPE (worth roughly $7.2 million). The address currently holds: 115,000 staked HYPE, 100,000 HYPE in available balance, and $1.1 million in USDC. For today’s trades, the whale closed two short positions: a $3.5 million short on $MU, netting $439,100 in profit; and a $2.42 million short on $SKHX, generating $581,900 in gains. The address still holds a large cumulative asset size, with the market closely monitoring its subsequent trading moves.

Relevant content

Native Markets Discontinues USDH, Will Continue to Support 1:1 Redemptions and Exchanges in the Coming Months

According to official announcements, Native Markets has announced that the USDH official website has been sunset. Over the coming months, users will still be able to redeem and exchange USDH for U.S. dollar assets at a 1:1 ratio via the redemption page provided by the Bridge. Native Markets stated that the final exit procedures for USDH and related information will continue to be made available through the USDH official website.

4 hours ago

Hackers Attack Kenya's Presidential Official Website, Demand 5 Bitcoin Ransom

Kenya's government is investigating the hacking incident targeting President William Ruto's official website. On July 18, attackers briefly altered the president's official site page and demanded a ransom of 5 BTC, threatening to leak undisclosed data if not paid. Kenya's Cabinet Secretary for Information, Communication and Digital Economy stated that the government has activated its cybersecurity response mechanism and is conducting a forensic investigation in collaboration with relevant agencies. There is currently no evidence indicating unauthorized access to or leakage of sensitive data, and government digital services remain operational.

4 hours ago

Bitcoin mining firm LM Funding rebrands as PowerCompute, shifting focus to AI computing power infrastructure.

Bitcoin mining company LM Funding America (NASDAQ: LMFA) announced it will rebrand to PowerCompute Inc. and adopt a new stock ticker "PWCM" effective July 22. The company stated that the rename marks its strategic transformation, as it leverages its existing 26 megawatts (MW) of owned power infrastructure to expand into high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure businesses. Currently, the firm operates two facilities in Oklahoma and Mississippi, U.S., with 26 MW of power capacity, and plans to provide infrastructure services to AI computing clients. It will also continue holding Bitcoin assets as part of its balance sheet.

4 hours ago

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve stocks have fallen to their lowest level since 1983.

U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) crude oil inventories fell by approximately 5.1 million barrels last week, dropping to 311.4 million barrels, the lowest level since 1983.

4 hours ago

Morgan Stanley: As memory shortage intensifies, DRAM prices may rise by at least 25% quarter-on-quarter in the third quarter.

Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore noted that following discussions with multiple data center procurement personnel last week, the current tight memory supply shows no signs of easing. DRAM and other memory products are expected to rise by at least 25% on a comparable basis from the second quarter to the third quarter, a figure higher than previous forecasts from Morgan Stanley and third-party institutions. Moore added that the memory shortage could further deteriorate in 2027 and 2028, as AI demand is consuming massive DRAM capacity, squeezing supplies for other sectors such as PCs and smartphones. Morgan Stanley further holds that the current market is not only grappling with surging memory demand driven by AI, but insufficient memory supply itself is emerging as a key bottleneck limiting AI expansion.

4 hours ago

The US military said it has forced seven commercial vessels to divert course and disabled one to restrict access to Iranian ports.

U.S. Central Command said that as of July 20, U.S. military forces have forced seven commercial vessels to alter their routes and disabled one merchant ship to prevent vessels from entering or leaving Iranian ports. (Jinshi)

4 hours ago
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:19 26d ago
Superseed to Abandon Self-Built Layer2, Migrate Back to Ethereum Mainnet
ETH Ethereum USDC USD Coin
CoinGecko News
Original source text
Not financial or tax advice. PANews content is strictly educational and informational and is not investment advice, financial advice, tax advice, legal advice, or a solicitation to buy or sell any digital asset, security, or financial product. Do your own research and consult qualified advisers.

Disclosure. PANews may publish sponsored content, partner content, advertisements, affiliate links, event promotions, and market commentary involving Web3 projects, service providers, or financial products. PANews personnel, contributors, or affiliates may hold digital assets or other interests related to covered topics. See our Terms of Service.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:06 26d ago
Lenovo vs. Dell: Which AI PC Stock Is the Better Buy Now?
DELL Dell
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Key Takeaways Lenovo tops Dell, with price appreciation, valuation and analyst sentiment giving it the edge.Lenovo's $21B-plus AI server pipeline and enterprise AI expansion support long-term growth.Dell raised fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to $165-$169B and expects about $60B in AI server revenues. The microcomputer space is being driven by AI-enabled PCs, enterprise device refresh cycles, and the growing adoption of hybrid work. Rising demand for high-performance computing, cloud-connected workflows, and enhanced cybersecurity is accelerating hardware upgrades.

Advancements in processors, on-device AI capabilities, and energy-efficient architectures are supporting premiumization, while the approaching end of support for older operating systems is expected to further stimulate commercial PC replacement demand.

Against this backdrop, let’s assess which company offers stronger long-term growth prospects — Lenovo Group (LNVGY - Free Report) or Dell Technologies (DELL - Free Report) . Lenovo Group is a global technology leader with a diversified presence across PCs, enterprise infrastructure and intelligent solutions. Dell Technologies is a leading provider of servers, storage and PCs. It offers secure, integrated solutions that extend from the edge to the core to the cloud.

The Case for LNVGYLenovo Group remains one of the world’s largest PC manufacturers, but its evolution into a diversified technology company is strengthening its long-term growth prospects. Expansion into higher-margin areas such as AI infrastructure, hybrid cloud, enterprise services and AI-enabled devices is reducing its reliance on the cyclical PC market and creating multiple earnings drivers.

The Intelligent Devices Group remains a dependable cash generator, supported by commercial PC replacement cycles, premium-device demand and growing AI PC adoption. Meanwhile, the Infrastructure Solutions Group is becoming an important growth engine as demand rises for AI servers, data-center infrastructure and high-performance computing. An AI server pipeline exceeding $21 billion provides strong revenue visibility.

Lenovo is also expanding its enterprise AI capabilities. Its Hybrid AI Advantage solutions, developed with NVIDIA, help enterprises deploy scalable, real-time AI inferencing across cloud and on-premise environments. The acquisition of Infinidat further strengthens Lenovo’s high-end enterprise storage portfolio, creating opportunities for revenue growth and margin improvement.

The company’s broad presence across Asia, Europe and the Americas limits dependence on any single region, while established relationships with enterprises, governments and channel partners reinforce its competitive position.

As Lenovo works toward becoming a full-stack AI leader, continued investment in Personal AI and Enterprise AI should support sustainable growth. Disciplined cost control, healthy cash generation, a prudent balance sheet and consistent dividend payments also position the company to fund innovation while delivering long-term shareholder value.

The Case for DELLDell benefits from a diversified portfolio spanning servers, storage, networking, PCs, and IT services, providing resilience across business cycles. Dell Technologies is seeing demand for AI servers stay ahead of supply as customers accelerate deployments and lock in capacity. A key growth driver is Dell's position as a leading supplier of AI-optimized servers, supported by demand for accelerated computing and partnerships with major semiconductor providers.

Dell’s expanding ecosystem supports a fuller stack for customers that who want to run AI on infrastructure they control. Management highlighted partners including NVIDIA, Google Cloud, OpenAI, ServiceNow, Palantir, Mistral and CrowdStrike, alongside collaboration on validated designs and software integration. As enterprises continue investing in AI infrastructure, Dell is well-positioned to capture incremental market share through its end-to-end solutions and global customer relationships.

The company's large installed enterprise customer base creates recurring opportunities for hardware refreshes, storage expansion, and lifecycle services. While the PC business remains cyclical, it provides scale and distribution advantages, with potential upside from commercial PC replacement cycles and AI-enabled devices.

Management raised fiscal 2027 revenue guidance to $165-$169 billion and lifted expected AI server revenues to about $60 billion. As Dell continues to prioritize margin rate expansion, it is prudently managing expenses.

Dell generates robust free cash flow, enabling consistent debt reduction, share repurchases, and dividend growth. Its disciplined capital allocation and improved balance sheet enhance shareholder returns while maintaining financial flexibility.

Estimates for LNVGY and DELL    The Zacks Consensus Estimate for LNVGY’s fiscal 2027 and 2028 revenues implies a 13% and 11.3% year-over-year increase, respectively. EPS estimates for fiscal 2027 and 2028 imply a 20.5% and 19.2% year-over-year increase, respectively. EPS estimates for 2026 and 2027 have moved up 30.5% and 18.9%, respectively, in the past 30 days.
 

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for DELL’s fiscal 2027 and 2028 revenues implies a 57.3% and 9.3% year-over-year increase, respectively. EPS estimates for 2026 and 2027 indicate an 82.5% and a 21.1% year-over-year increase, respectively. EPS estimates for 2026 and 2027 have moved up 0.8% and 1.4%, respectively, in the past 30 days.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Both carry a Growth Score of A.

Price Performance of LNVGY and DELLLNVGY shares have gained 98.4% in the past three months, while DELL shares have gained 86.6% in the same time. 
 

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Are LNVGY and DELL Shares Expensive?LNVGY is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-sales multiple of 0.35, higher than its median of 0.19 over the past five years. DELL’s forward 12-month price-to-earnings multiple sits at 1.43, slightly higher than its median of 0.64 over the past five years.

While Lenovo has a Value Score of A, Dell carries a Value Score of C.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

ConclusionLenovo Group presents an attractive investment opportunity, supported by its leading position in the global PC market, growing AI-related demand and improving profitability. Management targets $100 billion in revenues within two years, driven by operational efficiency and sustained innovation across Personal AI and Enterprise AI.

Dell is well-positioned to benefit from sustained AI-driven demand, a strong competitive standing, solid cash flow generation and long-term investment in digital infrastructure.

Both stocks sport a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) and have a VGM Score of A. Price appreciation, valuation, and analyst sentiment give Lenovo an edge over Dell.  You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:15 26d ago
Mark Zuckerberg Overtakes Michael Dell As 5th Richest Amid Dell Selloff
DELL Dell
FMP Stock News
Original source text
ToplineMark Zuckerberg became the world’s fifth-richest person on Monday, reclaiming the rank from Michael Dell as shares in his hardware firm declined, extending a cooling period for the stock since climbing to an all-time high last month.

The hardware firm’s stock has cooled since skyrocketing to an all-time high last month.

Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

Key FactsShares of Dell dropped 3.3% as of Monday afternoon, adding to an 8.8% slide the previous week and a more than 18% decline since hitting an intraday all-time record high of $469 on June 1.

Dell, who holds about 265.7 million Dell shares, saw his net worth cut by $2 billion to $221.1 billion, ranking him directly below Zuckerberg ($222.1 billion) on Forbes’ list of the world’s wealthiest people.

Meta’s stock, which traded down as much as 1.6%, rose to roughly break even on the day shortly before market close.

big number200%. That’s how much Dell shares have swelled by this year as they more than tripled in value, despite a recent selloff. Michael Dell’s fortune opened 2026 at $141 billion, ranking him as the 13th-richest person in the world, and his wealth has surged 864% since hitting $22.9 billion in 2020.

what to watch forDell will report Q2 earnings next month, while Meta reports next week.

key backgroundDell has become one of the largest beneficiaries of the broader buildup of AI infrastructure, as the hardware firm has become a key supplier to data centers. The company reported an 88% surge in revenue through its previous quarter, boosting Dell’s stock by 39% in its best trading session ever. AI server revenue skyrocketed by 757% over the previous year, Dell reported, with expectations for annual sales topping $60 billion. President Donald Trump, who became a shareholder in the first quarter, has urged investors to buy Dell, urging traders to “go out and buy a Dell.”

further readingForbesMichael Dell’s Net Worth Surges Up $35 Billion From Dell’s Best Day Ever—Passing Zuckerberg As 6th RichestBy Ty Roush
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:15 26d ago
ZTS Deadline: ZTS Investors with Loses in Excess of $100K Have Opportunity to Lead Zoetis Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit
ZTS Zoetis
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ --

Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Zoetis Inc. (NYSE: ZTS) between January 14, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 27, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.

So What: If you purchased Zoetis securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.

What to do next: To join the Zoetis class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/zoetis-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 27, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.

Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.

Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and touted growing market share, strong veterinarian adoption, and accelerating sales growth across Zoetis' flagship Companion Animal products and/or failed to disclose that: (1) veterinarian prescription growth and adoption of Zoetis' Librela, a canine pain treatment, were sharply weakening as clinicians became more cautious following FDA safety warnings concerning serious neurological complications in dogs; (2) Zoetis' Simparica Trio was losing significant market share to a lower priced competing canine parasiticide with broader indicated use in a slowing overall market; and (3) Zoetis' dermatology products, Apoquel and Cytopoint, were losing substantial market share to a newly launched competing canine treatment. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. 

To join the Zoetis class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/zoetis-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.

No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contact Information:

     Laurence Rosen, Esq.
     Phillip Kim, Esq.
     The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
     275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Tel: (212) 686-1060
     Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
     Fax: (212) 202-3827
     [email protected]
     www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.
2026-07-20 20:52 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:01 26d ago
Ross Expands Footprint With 47 New Stores
ROST Ross Stores
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Ross Stores, Inc. (Nasdaq: ROST) announced the grand opening of 47 new stores nationwide during June and July, including 35 Ross Dress for Less® ("Ross") and 12 dd's DISCOUNTS® locations across 15 states and territories. With these new openings, the Company is on track to open approximately 110 stores this year.

"Each new opening allows us to deliver compelling value to even more customers while creating new jobs and making a positive impact in the local communities," said Richard Lietz, Executive Vice President, Property Development. "Building on the strong new store performance in 2025 and the Spring openings this year, we are excited to grow Ross Dress for Less' store base in Puerto Rico, New York, and Michigan while also continuing to deepen our presence in key Sunbelt states. For dd's, we are also pleased to expand within our existing markets in California, Florida, North Carolina, and Texas."

In connection with these openings, Ross Stores continued its longstanding tradition of community engagement by making donations to local Boys & Girls Clubs or First Book literacy partners, supporting youth development and access to educational resources in the neighborhoods it serves.

"Looking ahead, we see attractive opportunities as off‑price continues to grow, and we are well positioned to capitalize on them," said Mr. Leitz.

For more information on these new openings, please visit Ross Dress for Less Grand Openings and dd's DISCOUNTS Grand Openings.

About Ross Stores, Inc.
Ross Stores, Inc. is an S&P 500, Fortune 500, and Nasdaq 100 (ROST) company headquartered in Dublin, California, with fiscal 2025 revenues of $22.8 billion. Currently, the Company operates Ross Dress for Less® ("Ross"), the largest off-price apparel and home fashion chain in the United States with 1,952 locations in 44 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and Puerto Rico. Ross offers first-quality, in-season, brand name and designer apparel, accessories, footwear, and home fashions for the entire family at savings of 20% to 60% off department and specialty store regular prices every day. The Company also operates 376 dd's DISCOUNTS® stores in 23 states that feature a more moderately-priced assortment of first-quality, in-season apparel, accessories, footwear, and home fashions for the entire family at savings of 20% to 70% off moderate department and discount store regular prices every day. Additional information is available at www.rossstores.com.

Contact:

Connie Kao

Senior Vice President, Investor & Media Relations

(925) 965-4668

[email protected]

SOURCE Ross Stores, Inc.
2026-07-20 20:50 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:40 26d ago
Paramount Suffers Major Early Blow In Merger Lawsuit—And Billion-Dollar Losses Could Lie Ahead
PARA Paramount Global
FMP Stock News
Original source text
ToplineA federal judge temporarily blocked Paramount Skydance’s planned merger with Warner Bros. Discovery on Monday, saying states had raised “serious questions” about whether the deal violates antitrust law—a potentially costly early signal for Paramount, as the company faces billions of dollars in payments if the deal either continues getting delayed or ultimately falls through.

The Paramount Pictures logo is displayed on a water tower in Los Angeles, California, on February 17.

NurPhoto via Getty Images

Key FactsJudge Araceli Martinez-Olguin issued a temporary restraining order Monday that bars Paramount from moving forward with the merger for two weeks, before deciding whether to issue a more lasting order that pauses the deal indefinitely while the litigation moves forward.

Paramount and Warner Bros. are trying to move forward with a $110 billion merger that has faced widespread pushback for allegedly unfairly restricting competition in the entertainment industry, and the ruling came in response to a lawsuit brought against the media company by a coalition of 12 Democratic state attorneys general.

While Martinez-Olguin did not rule Monday on whether Paramount’s deal is lawful, the judge signaled she’s skeptical of the deal, writing the states “make a strong showing that the Transaction will substantially lessen competition” and “raised serious questions about the merits of their antitrust claim.”

The judge’s ruling doesn’t immediately impact Paramount, beyond barring it from closing the deal for the next two weeks, but signals Martinez-Olguin could be inclined to delay the deal indefinitely or kill it entirely, which would prove costly for the media giant.

Under the terms of its deal with Warner Bros, Paramount has to pay a $0.25 per day “ticking fee” per share to Warner Bros. shareholders if the deal doesn’t close by Sept. 30—which would amount to $650 million per quarter or $7 million per day—and has also agreed to pay a $7 billion termination fee if the deal falls through due to regulatory issues.

Paramount said in a statement Monday it was “grateful” for how swiftly the judge issued the order in the case, and said it is “confident the evidence will demonstrate that the State AGs' antitrust arguments are without merit.”

CHIEF CRITIC“This merger is lawful, pro-competitive, and will benefit consumers, creators, workers, and the entertainment industry,” Paramount said. “We will continue to vigorously defend the transaction and will look forward to the hearings on the substance of the State AGs’ action.”

What to Watch forMartinez-Olguin scheduled a hearing for Aug. 3 on whether she should issue a more lasting order to pause the Paramount-Warner Bros. deal. That order could keep the merger on pause indefinitely while the litigation moves forward, which means it could be paused for years, unless an appeals court overrules her.

Crucial QuoteMartinez-Olguin noted in her ruling Monday her temporary order won’t cause Paramount any financial harm for now—but also suggested she isn’t sympathetic to its arguments about how much the delay could cost it. “Even if Defendants argued that they would suffer economic harm as a result of delaying the merger, the equities do not weigh in their favor when contrasted with the potential public harms that would result from consummation of the Transaction, including the loss of competition,” the judge wrote.

Big Number$6 billion. That’s how much Paramount has estimated it and Warner Bros. will save by combining their assets through the merger, Reuters notes, further adding to the costs the company will suffer if the deal doesn’t go through.

Key BackgroundThe states’ litigation is one of several pending lawsuits against Paramount over its planned merger, which was announced in February after Netflix backed off its effort to acquire Warner Bros. and said it couldn’t match Paramount’s bid. Paramount+ subscribers have also sued over the deal, arguing the lack of competition could raise prices for subscribers, and the Writers Guild of America filed suit last week. The union argues the deal could harm film and television writers by reducing competition in the industry and giving writers less options of who they can work for, arguing in a statement a potential merger would mean “writers will be paid less and have fewer employment opportunities.” Paramount has defended the deal amid the widespread criticism and alleged it would actually be “pro-competitive,” as Paramount and Warner Bros.’ new joint entity would be better equipped to compete with other media giants like Netflix, Apple and Disney. States sued Paramount in an effort to block the merger after the federal government cleared it in June, with the Justice Department concluding the deal was “not likely to result in harm to competition or American consumers.” The Trump administration’s approval of the deal has raised concerns, given Paramount CEO David Ellison’s ties to the president. Ellison and father Larry Ellison face a lawsuit from a Paramount investor over their alleged side dealings with the government to get the merger approved, which Paramount has strongly denied.

Further Reading California And Other States Challenge Massive Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger In New Lawsuit (Forbes)

Justice Department Greenlights Paramount-Warner Bros Merger With No Conditions (Forbes)

What The Paramount-Warner Bros. Merger Means For Larry Ellison’s Fortune (Forbes)
2026-07-20 20:50 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:30 26d ago
Fossil Group, Inc. Announces Date for 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
FOSL Fossil Group
FMP Stock News
Original source text
July 20, 2026 16:30 ET  | Source: Fossil Group, Inc.

RICHARDSON, Texas, July 20, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fossil Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: FOSL) (the “Company”) today announced that its 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on October 2, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (the “2026 Annual Meeting”). The Company’s Board of Directors has set August 3, 2026 as the record date for the 2026 Annual Meeting. The location of the 2026 Annual Meeting will be specified in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting.

Pursuant to the Company’s Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), the Company is providing its stockholders with the deadlines for stockholder proposals and director nominations for the 2026 Annual Meeting. The deadlines for submitting stockholder proposals and director nominations pursuant to the Bylaws, as set forth in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2025, no longer apply.

Stockholders submitting proposals or director nominations under the Bylaws must provide written notice to the Company’s Secretary at its principal executive offices at 901 S. Central Expressway, Richardson, Texas 75080, no later than the close of business on July 30, 2026, which is the 10th day after the date of the Company’s public announcement of the date of the 2026 Annual Meeting and which the Company has determined, for purposes of Rule 14a‑8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to be a reasonable time before it begins to print and mail its proxy materials. In addition, stockholders must otherwise comply with the applicable provisions of the Bylaws and the Exchange Act.

Additional information regarding the 2026 Annual Meeting will be provided in the Company’s proxy statement and related materials.

About Fossil Group, Inc.

Fossil Group, Inc. is a global design, marketing, distribution and innovation company specializing in lifestyle accessories. Under a diverse portfolio of owned and licensed brands, our offerings include watches, jewelry, handbags, small leather goods, belts and sunglasses. We are committed to delivering the best in design and innovation across our owned brands, Fossil, Michele, Relic, Skagen and Zodiac, and licensed brands, Armani Exchange, Diesel, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, Skechers and Tory Burch. We bring each brand story to life through an extensive distribution network across numerous geographies, categories, and channels. Certain press release and SEC filing information concerning the Company is also available at www.fossilgroup.com.    

Investor Relations:

Christine Greany
The Blueshirt Group
[email protected]
2026-07-20 20:49 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:05 26d ago
Medifast to Announce Financial Results for the Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2026
MED Medifast
FMP Stock News
Original source text
BALTIMORE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Medifast (NYSE: MED), the metabolic health and wellness company known for its science-backed comprehensive metabolic health system, Trilivy, will announce financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 on Monday, August 3, 2026, after market close. The Company will host a conference call to discuss the results with additional comments and details. Company participants will be Nick Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and Jim Maloney, Chief Financial Officer. The.
2026-07-20 20:49 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:15 26d ago
Chipotle Stock Is Sliding: What's Going On Today?
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill
FMP Stock News
Original source text
Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are sliding. Why is CMG stock falling? Cyclospora Outbreak Dents Fast-Casual Foot Traffic Across the SectorA foodborne Cyclospora parasite outbreak linked to contaminated iceberg lettuce sourced from Mexico has rattled the fast-casual dining space, sending foot traffic lower across multiple chains. The FDA traced the outbreak to lettuce used in Taco Bell’s supply chain, prompting supplier Taylor Farms and distributor Sysco to pull the product.

Placer.ai foot traffic data through July 17 shows Taco Bell visits fell 18.9% compared to its day-of-week average from January through early July. Chipotle was not spared, recording a 6.9% decline in customer visits over the same window, as broader consumer anxiety around fresh ingredients at Mexican-style fast-casual restaurants appears to be weighing on traffic regardless of direct supply chain involvement.

Earnings Preview Adds Another Layer of CautionBeyond the sector noise, traders appear to be trimming exposure ahead of Chipotle’s upcoming earnings release. Analysts are currently projecting earnings of 32 cents per share on revenue of $3.33 billion.

The stock has a history of sharp moves in either direction around quarterly results and with the report approaching some investors are choosing to reduce risk rather than carry a full position into the print. Any sign that recent foot traffic softness has fed through into weaker comparable sales figures could amplify the downside reaction when results hit.

CMG Versus The Tape: A Breakdown Test, Not A BreakoutThe chart is not helping CMG. The stock sits 2.5% below its 20‑day SMA $33.86 and 1% below its 100‑day SMA $33.33, levels that often act like speed bumps when buyers try to spark a rebound. It is still holding 1.4% above its 50‑day SMA $32.56 but remains 6.3% below its 200‑day SMA $35.24, which keeps the longer‑term trend tilted bearish.

Momentum is not signaling capitulation. RSI is at 47.20, a neutral zone that shows the move is not washed out but also not showing the kind of upside pressure that forces shorts to cover and sidelined buyers to chase. That neutrality matters because it suggests the stock can keep chopping or leaking without the technical relief valve of an oversold snapback.

Zoom out and the backdrop stays heavy. CMG is down 37.04% over the past 12 months. June delivered an oversold RSI event and the 52‑week low. July produced a swing high and a break above resistance. This pullback now serves as a test of whether that breakout reflected real demand or simply a temporary repricing in a thin summer tape.

Key levels are taking center stage. Resistance sits at $33.50, a nearby pivot zone that overlaps the 100‑day area where rebounds often stall. Support is $30.50, a floor that becomes more important if selling continues, sitting above the $28.04 52‑week low zone. If bulls cannot reclaim the moving‑average cluster, the next question becomes how quickly price starts probing that lower shelf.

CMG Shares Are DroppingCMG Price Action: Chipotle shares were down 4.07% at $33.04 at the time of publication on Monday, according to Benzinga Pro.

Image: Shutterstock

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
2026-07-20 20:49 26d ago
2026-07-20 16:30 26d ago
Steel Dynamics Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results
STLD Steel Dynamics
FMP Stock News
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- 

Second Quarter 2026 Performance Highlights:

Record steel shipments of 3.7 million tons Continued commissioning and increased production from aluminum flat rolled sheet operations   Net sales of $6.1 billion, operating income of $700 million, and net income of $534 million Adjusted EBITDA of $921 million and cash flow from operations of $428 million Share repurchases of $200 million of the company's common stock Steel Dynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ/GS: STLD) today announced second quarter 2026 financial results. The company reported second quarter 2026 net sales of $6.1 billion and net income of $534 million, or $3.69 per diluted share which was reduced by a $16 million non-cash asset impairment charge related to the decision to relocate the company's planned second satellite aluminum recycled slab center from Arizona to Columbus, Mississippi. Comparatively, the company's sequential first quarter 2026 net income was $403 million, or $2.78 per diluted share and prior year second quarter net income was $299 million, or $2.01 per diluted share.

"During the second quarter 2026 steel pricing continued to improve resulting in strong performance across our steel platform, driving a sequential quarterly increase in consolidated operating income of $162 million, or 30 percent," said Mark D. Millett, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "Our metals recycling, steel fabrication, and aluminum teams also had a solid performance. Our three-year after-tax return-on-invested capital of 13 percent is a testament to our ongoing high-return capital allocation execution. We are growing, returning capital to shareholders, and maintaining strong returns with best-in-class performance compared to domestic manufacturers.

"Steel fundamentals continued to strengthen during the second quarter, as pricing improved, demand remained solid, and customer inventory levels declined, remaining lower than historical norms," said Millett. "Steel backlogs and lead times have also extended. Additionally, value-added flat-rolled steel spreads expanded in the quarter. We continue to see an improved steel market environment, supported by domestic trade actions, manufacturing reshoring, infrastructure program funding, and the increasing regionalization of supply chains within the United States. Long-product steel demand remains extremely strong, particularly for structural steel and railroad rail. We believe sustained demand across our platforms, combined with favorable market conditions, positions us well moving forward.

"The aluminum team continues to make strong progress on the commissioning and startup of our aluminum flat-rolled sheet products mill located in Columbus, Mississippi," continued Millett. "The team is already providing high-quality products for the industrial, beverage, and automotive markets, with continued customer qualifications currently underway. We recently received qualifications to supply products for automotive applications, with expectations for automotive sales to commence before the end of 2026. Simultaneously, the team has finished construction and commenced commissioning of the third and final cold mill in July, which will allow for the full 650,000-metric-ton capacity. Together with our broader investment initiatives across the company, aluminum represents an exciting avenue for continued growth and value creation."   

Second Quarter 2026 Comments

Second quarter 2026 operating income for the company's steel operations was $721 million, or 30 percent higher than sequential first quarter results, due to record shipments and metal spread expansion across the platform, as steel pricing increased more than ferrous scrap costs. The second quarter 2026 average external product selling price for the company's steel operations increased $105 sequentially to $1,298 per ton. The average ferrous scrap cost per ton melted at the company's steel mills increased $16 sequentially to $412 per ton. The energy, non-residential construction, automotive, industrial, and agricultural sectors led steel demand in the quarter.

Compared to sequential first quarter results, second quarter 2026 operating income from the company's metals recycling operations remained steady at $48 million, supported by higher volumes as pricing decreased in the quarter. Scrap flows seasonally improved in the second quarter, resulting in ample supply as domestic steel mills increased utilization.

The company's steel fabrication operations generated operating income of $85 million in the second quarter 2026, in line with first quarter results of $90 million, as increased shipments and steady pricing were offset by higher steel raw material input costs. Customer order activity has continued to strengthen since the end of 2025, with the order backlog now nearly 45 percent higher than a year ago and extending into the first quarter 2027. Demand improved across several key end markets, including commercial construction, data centers, manufacturing, warehousing, and healthcare. In addition, accelerating announcements of significant domestic manufacturing investments and increased reshoring activity, coupled with funding from the U.S. infrastructure program, are expected to provide meaningful support for demand across our product portfolio, including steel joists and deck products, as well as flat-rolled and long-product steel.

Second quarter 2026 operating losses associated with the continued startup of the company's aluminum operations were $33 million, or a 48 percent improvement compared to sequential first quarter results. There was also an additional non-cash impairment charge of $16 million in the second quarter, related to the relocation of the planned second satellite aluminum recycled slab center. Aluminum flat rolled sheet product shipments increased to 53,000 metric tons in the second quarter 2026, while hot band production increased to 84,000 metric tons. The company expects volumes and profitability from its aluminum operations to increase sharply in the second half 2026 and for full year 2027, as startup costs subside, utilization and yields improve, and scrap content increases. Demand for aluminum flat-rolled sheet products across the company's consumer sectors remains strong, with the supply deficit growing.

The company generated cash flow from operations of $428 million during the second quarter 2026. Working capital, excluding income taxes increased $225 million in the second quarter, as product pricing and demand improved across the business and the aluminum operations continued to ramp. The company also invested $124 million in capital investments, paid cash dividends of $77 million, and repurchased $200 million of its outstanding common stock, while maintaining strong liquidity of $2.0 billion as of June 30, 2026.

Year-to-Date June 30, 2026 Comparison

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, net income was $938 million, or $6.47 per diluted share, with net sales of $11.3 billion, as compared to net income of $516 million, or $3.44 per diluted share, with net sales of $8.9 billion for the same period in 2025.

First half 2026 operating income increased 88 percent to $1.2 billion, when compared to the same period in 2025. Increased earnings were primarily the result of higher realized pricing and shipments in the company's steel operations.  First half 2026 operating income from the company's steel operations was $1.3 billion, compared to $612 million for the same prior year period. The average first half 2026 external selling price for the company's steel operations increased $183 to $1,247 per ton compared to the same prior year period, and the average ferrous scrap cost per ton melted at the company's steel mills increased $7 to $404 per ton.  First half 2026 operating income from the company's steel fabrication operations was $174 million, compared to $210 million in the same prior year period, due to a decrease in average pricing of $100 per ton combined with higher steel raw material input costs of $95 per ton. First half 2026 operating income from the company's metals recycling operations was $95 million, compared to $47 million in the same prior year period, due to improved metal spreads and increased shipments.

Based on the company's differentiated business model and highly variable cost structure, the company achieved cash flow from operations of $576 million in the first half 2026. The company also invested $262 million in capital investments, paid cash dividends of $149 million, and repurchased $315 million of its outstanding common stock, representing one percent of its outstanding shares, while maintaining liquidity of $2.0 billion.

Outlook   

"We remain confident that market conditions are in place to support strong domestic steel and aluminum consumption through the remainder of 2026 and into 2027," said Millett. "Customer sentiment, order entry activity, and pricing have continued to improve across our businesses. In addition, discussions with our customers further underscore the growing importance of lower-carbon, domestically produced steel and aluminum products, positioning our operations with a sustainable long-term competitive advantage.

As the impact of unfair trade practices continues to diminish, policy clarity improves, and U.S. manufacturing investment expands, we believe the foundation is in place for a favorable market environment and sustained demand growth.

"The aluminum team continues to make progress commissioning our aluminum flat rolled products mill, as well as our San Luis Potosi, Mexico satellite recycled aluminum slab center. Two of the three cold mills are now operational, and the third cold mill is currently being commissioned, with expectations to begin transitioning to commercial operations in August. Additionally, the first of two Continuous Annealing and Solution Heat (CASH) lines, which support the production of finished automotive products, is operating and shipping material for customer qualification. The second CASH line is also expected to begin material qualifications in the fourth quarter 2026.

"We have intentionally aligned our growth strategy with our customers' evolving needs, with a focus on product excellence, supply chain efficiency, and sustainability. Building on our strong positions in steel, we are expanding into high-recycled-content aluminum sheet products to serve deficit adjacent markets where customer demand continues to accelerate. This opportunity spans the resilient beverage can and packaging market and extends to automotive, industrial, and construction applications. Supported by our performance-driven culture and proven ability to develop and operate low-cost, high-margin manufacturing assets, we believe we are well positioned to create attractive long-term value through this expansion. As demand for domestically produced, lower-carbon materials continue to grow, our strategic investments in aluminum will complement our existing steel platforms and strengthen our ability to serve customers across a broader range of end markets.

"Our commitment is to the health and safety of our teams, families, and communities, while meeting the current and future needs of our customers. Our culture and business model continues to positively differentiate our performance from the rest of the industry. We continue to focus on delivering superior value to our team members, customers, and shareholders," concluded Millett.

Conference Call and Webcast

Steel Dynamics, Inc. will hold a conference call to discuss second quarter 2026 operating and financial results on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time. You may access the call and find dial-in information on the Investors section of the company's website at www.steeldynamics.com.  A replay of the call will be available on our website until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on July 30, 2026.

About Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Steel Dynamics is a leading industrial metals solutions company, with facilities located throughout the United States, and in Mexico. The company operates using a circular manufacturing model, producing lower-carbon-emission, quality products with recycled scrap as the primary input. Steel Dynamics is one of the largest domestic steel producers and metal recyclers in North America, combined with a meaningful downstream steel fabrication platform. The company has also recently added aluminum operations, further diversifying its product offerings to supply aluminum flat rolled products with higher recycled content to the countercyclical sustainable beverage can industry, in addition to the automotive and industrial sectors. Steel Dynamics is committed to operating with the highest integrity and to being the safest, most efficient producer of high-quality, broadly diversified, value-added metal products.

Note Regarding Financial Metrics

The company believes that after-tax return-on-invested capital (After-tax ROIC) provides an indication of the effectiveness of the company's invested capital and is calculated as follows:             

After-tax ROIC =

Net Income Attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

(Quarterly Average Current Maturities of Long-term Debt + Long-term Debt + Total Equity)

Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The company reports its financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Management believes that the non-GAAP financial measures EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide additional meaningful information regarding the company's performance and financial strength. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to and not as an alternative for the company's reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical calculations for EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA; therefore, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA included in this release may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains some predictive statements about future events, including statements related to conditions in domestic or global economies, conditions in steel, aluminum, and recycled metals marketplaces, Steel Dynamics' revenues, costs of purchased materials, future profitability and earnings, and the operation of new, existing or planned facilities. These statements, which we generally precede or accompany by such typical conditional words as "anticipate", "intend", "believe", "estimate", "plan", "seek", "project", or "expect", or by the words "may", "will", or "should", are intended to be made as "forward-looking", subject to many risks and uncertainties, within the safe harbor protections of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements speak only as of this date and are based upon information and assumptions, which we consider reasonable as of this date, concerning our businesses and the environments in which they operate. Such predictive statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we undertake no duty to update or revise any such statements. Some factors that could cause such forward-looking statements to turn out differently than anticipated include: (1) domestic and global economic factors; (2) global steelmaking overcapacity and imports of steel, together with increased scrap prices; (3) the cyclical nature of the metals industries and the industries we serve; (4) volatility and major fluctuations in prices and availability of scrap metal, scrap substitutes and supplies, and our potential inability to pass higher costs on to our customers; (5) cost and availability of electricity, natural gas, oil, and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions; (6) increased environmental, greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability considerations from our customers and investors or related regulations; (7) compliance with and changes in environmental and remediation requirements; (8) significant price and other forms of competition from other steel and aluminum producers, scrap processors and alternative materials; (9) availability of an adequate source of supply of scrap for our metals recycling operations; (10) cybersecurity threats and risks to the security of our sensitive data and information technology; (11) the implementation of our growth strategy; (12) our ability to retain, develop and attract key personnel; (13) litigation and legal compliance; (14) unexpected equipment downtime or shutdowns; (15) difficulties in the launch or production ramp-up of new products; (16) our aluminum operations depend on a core group of significant customers; (17) governmental agencies may refuse to grant or renew some of our licenses and permits; (18) our existing debt agreements contain, and any future financing agreements may contain, restrictive covenants that may limit our flexibility; and (19) the impacts of impairment charges.

More specifically, we refer you to our more detailed explanation of these and other factors and risks that may cause such predictive statements to turn out differently, as set forth in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K under the headings Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors, in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, or in other reports which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are available publicly on the Securities and Exchange Commission website, www.sec.gov, and on our website, www.steeldynamics.com under "Investors – SEC Filings."

Steel Dynamics, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months

June 30,

June 30,

Ended

2026

2025

2026

2025

March 31, 2026

Net sales

$

6,091,557

$

4,565,123

$

11,296,415

$

8,934,318

$

5,204,858

Costs of goods sold

5,132,583

3,946,655

9,574,218

7,829,306

4,441,635

      Gross profit

958,974

618,468

1,722,197

1,105,012

763,223

Selling, general and administrative expenses

193,451

198,010

368,671

379,818

175,220

Profit sharing

57,314

30,706

99,512

53,401

42,198

Amortization of intangible assets

7,730

6,897

15,531

13,794

7,801

      Operating income

700,479

382,855

1,238,483

657,999

538,004

Interest expense, net of capitalized interest

39,120

17,381

72,361

29,512

33,241

Other income, net

(22,105)

(22,392)

(30,555)

(40,033)

(8,450)

      Income before income taxes

683,464

387,866

1,196,677

668,520

513,213

Income tax expense

152,679

86,675

265,787

149,650

113,108

      Net income

530,785

301,191

930,890

518,870

400,105

Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests

3,302

(2,465)

6,633

(2,993)

3,331

      Net income attributable to Steel Dynamics, Inc.

$

534,087

$

298,726

$

937,523

$

515,877

$

403,436

Basic earnings per share attributable to

   Steel Dynamics, Inc. stockholders

$

3.71

$

2.01

$

6.49

$

3.45

$

2.79

Weighted average common shares outstanding

143,997

148,387

144,397

149,325

144,797

Diluted earnings per share attributable to

   Steel Dynamics, Inc. stockholders, including the

   effect of assumed conversions when dilutive

$

3.69

$

2.01

$

6.47

$

3.44

$

2.78

Weighted average common shares

   and share equivalents outstanding

144,591

148,960

144,956

149,885

145,321

Dividends declared per share

$

0.53

$

0.50

$

1.06

$

1.00

$

0.53

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

June 30,

December 31,

Assets

2026

2025

(unaudited)

Current assets

   Cash and equivalents

$

567,708

$

769,878

   Accounts receivable, net

2,442,938

1,682,660

   Inventories

3,955,621

3,738,516

   Other current assets

314,768

293,117

      Total current assets

7,281,035

6,484,171

Property, plant and equipment, net

8,491,771

8,569,466

Intangible assets, net

315,759

331,290

Goodwill

477,471

477,471

Other assets

547,363

557,382

      Total assets

$

17,113,399

$

16,419,780

Liabilities and Equity

Current liabilities

   Accounts payable

$

1,483,566

$

1,231,358

   Income taxes payable

32,345

67,315

   Accrued expenses

770,063

788,926

   Current maturities of long-term debt

1,332

34,655

      Total current liabilities

2,287,306

2,122,254

Long-term debt

4,180,810

4,176,508

Deferred income taxes

1,070,817

1,004,375

Other liabilities

211,395

186,232

      Total liabilities

7,750,328

7,489,369

Commitments and contingencies

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

143,259

141,226

Equity

   Common stock

653

653

   Treasury stock, at cost

(8,287,758)

(7,980,549)

   Additional paid-in capital

1,229,734

1,248,634

   Retained earnings

16,473,691

15,689,042

   Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

3,212

(598)

      Total Steel Dynamics, Inc. equity

9,419,532

8,957,182

   Noncontrolling interests

(199,720)

(167,997)

      Total equity

9,219,812

8,789,185

      Total liabilities and equity

$

17,113,399

$

16,419,780

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

June 30,

June 30,

2026

2025

2026

2025

Operating activities:

   Net income

$

530,785

$

301,191

$

930,890

$

518,870

   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by

      operating activities:

      Depreciation and amortization

173,922

132,865

333,202

266,621

      Equity-based compensation

14,162

14,063

31,613

31,103

      Deferred income taxes

29,978

39,129

62,647

55,378

      Other adjustments

14,431

(890)

12,138

(5,085)

      Changes in certain assets and liabilities:

         Accounts receivable

(386,504)

19,825

(760,278)

(283,777)

         Inventories

(48,843)

(163,417)

(223,270)

(149,607)

         Other assets

(23,468)

7,789

(2,467)

(24,326)

         Accounts payable

107,310

(5,267)

264,215

243,333

         Income taxes receivable/payable

(109,889)

(82,710)

(35,457)

(39,895)

         Accrued expenses

126,052

39,033

(36,981)

(158,401)

      Net cash provided by operating activities

427,936

301,611

576,252

454,214

Investing activities:

   Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(123,842)

(288,331)

(261,821)

(593,837)

   Purchases of short-term investments

-

(29,571)

-

(39,571)

   Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments

-

9,614

-

147,425

   Other investing activities

5,805

2,592

4,718

1,528

      Net cash used in investing activities

(118,037)

(305,696)

(257,103)

(484,455)

Financing activities:

   Issuance of current and long-term debt

695,091

484,278

1,294,560

1,890,221

   Repayment of current and long-term debt

(716,223)

(902,605)

(1,328,582)

(1,335,132)

   Dividends paid

(76,555)

(74,690)

(149,025)

(144,204)

   Purchase of treasury stock

(200,288)

(200,048)

(315,375)

(450,186)

   Other financing activities

(697)

(31,718)

(23,009)

(62,187)

      Net cash used in financing activities

(298,672)

(724,783)

(521,431)

(101,488)

Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

11,227

(728,868)

(202,282)

(131,729)

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

561,763

1,192,149

775,272

595,010

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

$

572,990

$

463,281

$

572,990

$

463,281

Supplemental disclosure information:

   Cash paid for interest

$

67,149

$

34,737

$

93,149

$

63,214

   Cash paid for income taxes, net

$

231,062

$

124,753

$

235,553

$

128,470

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands)

Second Quarter

YTD

2026

2025

2026

2025

1Q 2026

External Net Sales

   Steel

$

4,005,510

$

3,275,551

$

7,544,253

$

6,342,567

$

3,538,743

   Steel Fabrication

393,805

340,648

749,238

692,955

355,433

   Metals Recycling

653,765

522,721

1,246,948

1,057,616

593,183

   Aluminum

497,867

65,632

725,260

132,208

227,393

   Other

540,610

360,571

1,030,716

708,972

490,106

Consolidated Net Sales

$

6,091,557

$

4,565,123

$

11,296,415

$

8,934,318

$

5,204,858

Operating Income (Loss)

   Steel

$

720,918

$

382,196

$

1,277,482

$

612,159

$

556,564

   Steel Fabrication

84,593

93,115

174,107

209,860

89,514

   Metals Recycling

47,816

21,290

95,283

47,000

47,467

   Aluminum

(33,380)

(40,627)

(97,972)

(69,362)

(64,592)

819,947

455,974

1,448,900

799,657

628,953

   Non-cash amortization of intangible assets

(7,730)

(6,897)

(15,531)

(13,794)

(7,801)

   Profit sharing expense

(57,314)

(30,706)

(99,512)

(53,401)

(42,198)

   Non-segment operations

(37,946)

(35,516)

(78,896)

(74,463)

(40,950)

   Non-cash asset impairment charges

(16,478)

-

(16,478)

-

-

Consolidated Operating Income

$

700,479

$

382,855

$

1,238,483

$

657,999

$

538,004

Adjusted EBITDA

      Net income

$

530,785

$

301,191

$

930,890

$

518,870

$

400,105

      Income taxes

152,679

86,675

265,787

149,650

113,108

      Net interest expense

33,179

7,025

59,232

9,341

26,053

      Depreciation

163,901

124,003

313,095

249,125

149,194

      Amortization of intangible assets

7,730

6,897

15,531

13,794

7,801

 EBITDA

888,274

525,791

1,584,535

940,780

696,261

      Non-cash adjustments

         Unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives

         and currency remeasurement

1,559

(6,197)

(10,035)

12,956

(11,594)

         Equity-based compensation

14,208

13,819

29,438

28,000

15,230

         Asset impairment charges

16,478

-

16,478

-

-

Adjusted EBITDA

$

920,519

$

533,413

$

1,620,416

$

981,736

$

699,897

Other Operating Information

   Steel

      Average external sales price (Per ton)

$

1,298

$

1,134

$

1,247

$

1,064

$

1,193

      Average ferrous cost (Per ton Melted)

$

412

$

408

$

404

$

397

$

396

      Flat Roll shipments

         Butler, Columbus, and Sinton

2,026,079

1,952,228

4,037,522

4,071,415

2,011,443

         Steel Processing divisions *

717,837

479,102

1,404,277

971,729

686,440

      Long Product shipments

         Structural and Rail Division

510,322

468,827

1,001,293

906,225

490,971

         Engineered Bar Products Division

213,220

190,612

407,242

382,270

194,022

         Roanoke Bar Division

175,792

151,828

343,629

296,014

167,837

         Steel of West Virginia

98,090

107,201

186,245

203,684

88,155

Total Shipments (Tons)

3,741,340

3,349,798

7,380,208

6,831,337

3,638,868

External Shipments (Tons)

3,085,372

2,888,916

6,051,496

5,960,651

2,966,124

Steel Mill Production (Tons)

2,974,075

2,949,936

6,013,442

5,971,529

3,039,367

   Metals Recycling

      Nonferrous shipments (000's of pounds)

211,050

245,577

408,435

478,657

197,385

      Ferrous shipments (Gross tons)

1,672,886

1,596,583

3,146,343

3,049,015

1,473,457

         External ferrous shipments (Gross tons)

588,906

545,022

1,142,273

1,102,640

553,367

   Steel Fabrication

      Average sales price (Per ton)

$

2,442

$

2,517

$

2,458

$

2,558

$

2,478

      Shipments (Tons)

161,010

135,347

304,432

270,928

143,422

*   Includes Heartland, The Techs, United Steel Supply, and New Process Steel (beginning December 1, 2025) operations

SOURCE Steel Dynamics, Inc.
2026-07-20 20:45 26d ago
2026-07-20 15:05 26d ago
Should You Buy Rocket Lab Stock Below $70?
RKLB Rocket Lab USA
FMP Stock News
Original source text
A space economy boom is turning into a stock market collapse. After the monster Space Exploration Technologies (better known as SpaceX) IPO earlier this year, space stocks began to slip, and quickly, from their highs. Rocket Lab (RKLB 2.66%) could be called the poster child for these wild gyrations in space stocks.

The maker of rockets and other space systems saw its stock rise by more than 150% at one point over the last 12 months before falling 55% from a high set in May. As of this writing, the stock trades at $67.50. Should you buy shares of Rocket Lab below $70?

The answer is clear if you look at the numbers.

Image source: Getty Images.

A potentially transformative acquisition Rocket Lab has defied the odds. It looks as if the business is poised to become the second vertically integrated spaceflight player, operating alongside SpaceX as a transportation and services juggernaut for companies wanting to operate in orbit.

It has a new rocket, the Neutron, which is undergoing testing and will bring it to payload parity with SpaceX's current workhorse, the Falcon 9. In addition to sending payloads into orbit, Rocket Lab has developed and acquired space systems products, including satellite production, space capsules, energy generation, and communications.

Combined, this aggressive push to vertically integrate space economy services has led to $680 million in trailing 12-month revenue, up over 1,000% in the last five years. Now, it is making a potentially transformative acquisition of Iridium, a satellite communications provider. This is being done to accelerate its timeline to directly compete with SpaceX's Starlink satellite internet service and to obtain L-band spectrum rights at a reasonable price. Iridium is being acquired for $8 billion and generates $871 million in revenue, more than Rocket Lab's entire business today.

If this acquisition closes and the Neutron rocket begins commercial flights, Rocket Lab's capabilities will start looking more like SpaceX's in the near future.

With a falling share price, you might think that Rocket Lab now trades at a reasonable price relative to its growth potential. However, as with many space economy stocks, shares of Rocket Lab seem to have gotten well ahead of themselves in the last few years.

Today's Change

(

-2.66

%) $

-1.80

Current Price

$

65.82

After this drawdown, Rocket Lab trades at a price-to-sales ratio (P/S) of 55, which is an extreme multiple rarely seen in the stock market. Even if revenue grows more than 10 times over the next five years, it will only bring this P/S ratio down to around the S&P 500's average, before considering shareholder dilution.

For this reason, investors should not buy Rocket Lab stock right now. Wait for it to fall even more from here.