ResearchMy StocksToolsFree Benzinga Pro Trial Calendars
Analyst Ratings Calendar
Conference Call Calendar
Dividend Calendar
Earnings Calendar
Economic Calendar
Events Calendar
FDA Calendar
Guidance Calendar
IPO Calendar
M&A Calendar
Unusual Options Activity Calendar
SPAC Calendar
Stock Split Calendar
Trade Ideas
Stock Reports
Insider Trades
Trade Idea Feed
Analyst Ratings
Unusual Options Activity
Heatmaps
Free Newsletter
Government Trades
Perfect Stock Portfolio
Easy Income Portfolio
Short Interest
Most Shorted
Largest Increase
Largest Decrease
Calculators
Options Profit Calculator
Margin Calculator
Forex Profit Calculator
100x Options Profit Calculator
Covered Call Calculator
Cash-Secured Put Calculator
Long Call Calculator
Long Put Calculator
Screeners
Stock Screener
Top Momentum Stocks
Top Quality Stocks
Top Value Stocks
Top Growth Stocks
Compare Best Stocks
Best Momentum Stocks
Best Quality Stocks
Best Value Stocks
Best Growth Stocks
June 29, 2026 2:33 PM 2 min read
BB Shares Are RisingBB Price Action: BlackBerry shares were up 10.53% at $12.60 at the time of publication on Monday. The stock is trading at a new 52-week high, according to Benzinga Pro.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
Posted In:
Trading IdeasMoversNewswhy it's moving
Connect With Us
About Benzinga
About UsCareersAdvertiseContact UsMarket Resources
Advanced Stock Screener ToolsOptions Trading Chain AnalysisComprehensive Earnings CalendarDividend Investor Calendar and AlertsEconomic Calendar and Market EventsIPO Calendar and New ListingsMarket Outlook and AnalysisWall Street Analyst Ratings and TargetsTrading Tools & Education
Benzinga Pro Trading PlatformOptions Trading Strategies and NewsStock Market Trading Ideas and AnalysisTechnical Analysis Charts and IndicatorsFundamental Analysis and ValuationDay Trading Guides and StrategiesLive Investor EventsPre-market Stock Analysis and NewsCryptocurrency Market Analysis and NewsRing the Bell
A newsletter built for market enthusiasts by market enthusiasts. Top stories, top movers, and trade ideas delivered to your inbox every weekday before and after the market closes.
Teladoc (TDOC) was a big mover last session on higher-than-average trading volume. The latest trend in earnings estimate revisions might not help the stock continue moving higher in the near term.
, /PRNewswire/ -- National plaintiffs' law firm Berger Montague PC announces a class action lawsuit against Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZG, Z) ("Zillow" or the "Company") on behalf of investors who purchased or acquired Zillow common stock during the period from February 11, 2025 through May 7, 2026 (the "Class Period").
Investor Deadline: Investors who purchased or acquired Zillow securities during the Class Period may, no later than August 10, 2026, seek to be appointed as a lead plaintiff representative of the class. To learn your rights, CLICK HERE.
Based in Seattle, Washington, Zillow operates a network of online rental and housing platforms serving renters, property managers, and multifamily housing operators. The Company generates revenue through rental advertising, lead generation, and other housing-related services.
According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, Defendants described Zillow's February 2025 transaction with Redfin as a strategic partnership that would broaden the Company's rental listings business. The complaint alleges that Defendants failed to disclose that the arrangement effectively transferred Redfin's multifamily rental advertising operations to Zillow and materially increased the Company's exposure to antitrust scrutiny.
The truth allegedly began to emerge on September 30, 2025, when the FTC sued Zillow and Redfin, alleging that the companies entered into an unlawful agreement that resulted in Redfin's exit from the multifamily rental advertising market.
Thereafter, on February 10, 2026, Zillow disclosed that higher-than-expected legal expenses had adversely affected financial results and would continue to pressure profitability in the first quarter of 2026.
The alleged risks were further materialized on May 7, 2026, when a federal court rejected Zillow's and Redfin's efforts to dismiss the FTC action. Following each of these revelations, Zillow's Class A and Class C common declined materially.
If you are a Zillow investor and would like to learn more about this action, CLICK HERE or please contact Berger Montague: Andrew Abramowitz at [email protected] or (215) 875-3015, or Caitlin Adorni at [email protected] or (267) 764-4865.
About Berger Montague
Berger Montague is one of the nation's preeminent law firms focusing on complex civil litigation, class actions, and mass torts in federal and state courts throughout the United States. With more than $2.4 billion in 2025 post-trial judgments alone, the Firm is a leader in the fields of complex litigation, antitrust, consumer protection, defective products, environmental law, employment law, securities, and whistleblower cases, among many other practice areas. For over 55 years, Berger Montague has played leading roles in precedent-setting cases and has recovered over $50 billion for its clients and the classes they have represented. Berger Montague is headquartered in Philadelphia and has offices in Chicago; Malvern, PA; Minneapolis; San Diego; San Francisco; Toronto, Canada; Washington, D.C., and Wilmington, DE.
For more information or to discuss your rights, please contact:
Andrew Abramowitz
Berger Montague
(215) 875-3015
[email protected]
Eli Lilly and Regeneron are among the first seven companies the U.S. Food and Drug Administration selected for a pilot program designed to accelerate reviews of new domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities, CNBC has learned.
Lilly, Regeneron, Amneal, Cellares, Fujifilm Biotechnologies, Kriya Therapeutics and Kyowa Kirin are the first companies that will participate in the FDA's PreCheck pilot program, according to FDA spokesperson Benjamin Nichols. The initiative will allow regulators to start reviewing new manufacturing facilities while they're under construction to catch and correct any issues, which the FDA estimates could save companies up to 14 months.
Producing more drugs domestically has been a priority for the Trump administration. The initial recipients range from the most valuable healthcare company in the world to closely held biotechs developing gene therapies. The majority of them plan to make biologic drugs or genetic medicines, which involve more complex manufacturing than the pills most Americans know best.
To be eligible for the PreCheck program, companies needed to build a new manufacturing facility capable of making drugs that would address a market supply gap or improve access to therapies for unmet medical needs. Only drugs that rely on the facility will be covered by the program.
For example, the FDA selected Lilly's Lebanon, Indiana, facility that will make the main ingredients of GLP-1 pills and shots. Lilly said it's "evaluating how PreCheck and related regulatory improvements may impact the facility's timeline and will continue to work closely with FDA to support the program's success."
The $2 billion Saratoga Springs, New York, site that Regeneron announced last fall was also chosen. In a statement, Regeneron CEO Leonard Schleifer said Regeneron has invested in U.S. biologics manufacturing and advocated for increased focus on domestic production of medicines.
"We're pleased to see programs like the FDA's PreCheck Pilot Program that encourage collaboration between innovators and regulators to build next generation manufacturing capabilities and strengthen America's biopharmaceutical industry," he said.
Another recipient is Fujfilm Biotechnologies' new facility in Holly Springs, North Carolina. The contract manufacturer opened the site last year. It's already making monoclonal antibodies for customers Regeneron and Johnson & Johnson, and will produce them for other customers as more parts of the site open in 2027 and 2028.
The PreCheck program includes two components: facility readiness, where the FDA gives the companies technical guidance before the site opens, and application submission, where participants can get more hands-on feedback from the FDA and expedited inspections and facility evaluation.
Fujifilm said it expects the operational readiness review before the end of the year thanks to the expedited process. And it expects the program will allow its customers to explore faster approval pathways with the FDA.
Initial participants in the FDA's PreCheck pilot program
Amneal Pharmaceuticals: Amneal's facility in New York that will make small molecule sterile liquid products for pain management, respiratory and ophthalmic diseasesCellares: Cellares' facility in New Jersey that will manufacture cell-based gene therapies for oncology and hematology diseasesEli Lilly: Eli Lilly's Indiana facility that will make the main ingredients of GLP-1 pills and shotsFujifilm Biotechnologies: Fujifilm's facility in North Carolina that will produce monoclonal antibodies Kriya Therapeutics: Kriya's facility North Carolina that will manufacture AAV-based gene therapies for chronic diseasesKyowa Kirin: Kyowa's facility in North Carolina that will manufacture biologics for rare diseases.Regeneron: Regeneron's facility in New York that will produce biologic drug substance, sterile injectables and protein therapeutics for multiple diseases
Key Takeaways Globus Medical outpaced Medtronic in share gains and analyst price target upside over the past year. GMED posted strong Spine and Trauma growth, stayed debt-free and continued investing in R&D and new product. MDT expanded robotics and digital surgery, increased its dividend and returned $4.2 billion to shareholders. Over the past year, shares of Globus Medical (GMED - Free Report) and Medtronic (MDT - Free Report) have gained 46.1% and 7.6%, respectively, significantly outperforming the industry’s 9.6% decline. U.S. medical stocks offer strong structural growth prospects driven by an aging global population, rising chronic disease prevalence and rapid technological integration.
Given these positives, Globus Medical posted revenue growth of 27% year over year in the first quarter. Medtronic experienced 9.9% year-over-year revenue growth in the fiscal fourth quarter.
It is time for investors to assess whether this momentum can extend through 2026. Let’s find out.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Case for GMEDGlobus Medical is taking share in Musculoskeletal Solutions, supported by broad-based growth across its core categories. In the first quarter of 2026, U.S. Spine marked its third straight quarter of 10% growth, with double-digit growth cited across standard fixation, minimally invasive surgery pedicle screws, expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, anteriorlumbar interbody fusion, posterior cervical and cervical plating.
International Spine also grew 16.4% in the first quarter. Trauma revenues increased 30.4%, aided by continued adoption of the core trauma line and the Precice limb lengthening portfolio, with ANTHEM Elbow continuing to exceed expectations.
The company continues to invest in R&D and product cadence as core part of its competitive positioning. In the first quarter of 2026, R&D expenses were 4.8% of sales, with management expecting it to be 5-6% of net sales for the full year, with spend ramping methodically through the year as product efforts progress.
Its early FDA 510(k) clearances for patient-specific lumbar spacers and rods reinforced its roadmap of linking planning software, enabling technologies and implants into one workflow. This launch activity complements the broader post-merger strategy of compressing development timelines and keeping the portfolio fresh across spine and orthopedics.
Globus Medical ended the first quarter of 2026 with $560.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and $68.9 million of short-term marketable securities. The company remains debt-free, which preserves the capacity to fund R&D, sales-force investments and manufacturing expansion without relying on external financing. Liquidity is also being replenished internally, with $202.4 million of operating cash flow generated in the quarter. This supports continued capital spending and buybacks alongside ongoing integration work.
The Case for MDTWithin Medtronic’s Medical Surgical portfolio, growth is supported by Hugo robotic-assisted surgery, Touch Surgery, Endoscopy and Acute Care & Monitoring. Surgical & Endoscopy rose 3.5% organically in the fourth quarter, with Hugo contributing as procedure volumes expanded globally.
Acute Care & Monitoring grew 10.5% organically in the fourth quarter, driven by Nellcor pulse oximetry, respiratory and airway products, and perioperative offerings. Management expects MedSurg growth to normalize in fiscal 2027, but the portfolio enters the year with broader robotics and digital capabilities.
Also, the company submitted Hugo to the FDA for general surgery and gynecologic indications, as well as for the LigaSure RAS vessel sealer. It received FDA clearance for ProGrip Advanced, a mesh optimized for robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair. Touch Surgery installations exceeded 1,400 and increased more than 30% sequentially, adding a digital layer to the robotics ecosystem.
Medtronic exited fiscal 2026 with $9.2 billion in cash and investments compared with $8.38 billion at the end of the fiscal third quarter. On the debt side, the company issued $1.75 billion of long-term debt and repaid $2.93 billion during fiscal 2026, while current debt obligations increased $9 million on a net basis.
Medtronic returned $4.2 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2026 and raised its quarterly dividend to $0.72 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2027, marking the 49th consecutive year of dividend increases. The balance sheet position gives the company room to support tuck-in deals in coronary, neurovascular, neuromodulation and EP imaging while maintaining shareholder returns.
Valuation: GMED vs. MDTGlobus Medical currently trades at a forward, one-year, price-to-sales (P/S) of 3.55X, higher than its median. Medtronic’s 2.67X P/S sits below its median. Additionally, Globus Medical trades expensive than Medtronic.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Short Term Price Target Favors GMED Over MDTGMED: Based on short-term price targets offered by 12 analysts, the average price target of $109.83 represents an increase of 29.75% from the last closing price.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
MDT: Based on short-term price targets offered by 25 analysts, the average price target of $96.96 represents an increase of 20.42% from the last closing price.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
End NoteBoth Globus Medical and Medtronic are well positioned to benefit from long-term growth trends in musculoskeletal and medical technology markets, but they offer different investment profiles.
Globus Medical stands out for its strong execution in Spine and Trauma, robust product innovation pipeline, debt-free balance sheet and disciplined investment in R&D, positioning it as a higher-growth company. Meanwhile, Medtronic benefits from greater scale and a diversified portfolio, supported by expanding robotic-assisted surgery capabilities, digital surgery platforms and a long track record of shareholder returns through dividends and capital allocation.
For investors, Globus Medical, currently carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), appears to be the stronger choice, given that it has outperformed Medtronic over the past year. However, for investors seeking a more discounted entry, Medtronic, carrying a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) at present, may offer deeper value but with meaningfully higher risk. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Investors interested in Diversified Operations stocks are likely familiar with Sumitomo Corp. (SSUMY) and Honeywell International Inc. (HON). But which of these two stocks presents investors with the better value opportunity right now?
Getting big returns from financial portfolios, whether through stocks, bonds, ETFs, other securities, or a combination of all, is an investor's dream. But when you're an income investor, your primary focus is generating consistent cash flow from each of your liquid investments.
Cash flow can come from bond interest, interest from other types of investments, and, of course, dividends. A dividend is that coveted distribution of a company's earnings paid out to shareholders, and investors often view it by its dividend yield, a metric that measures the dividend as a percent of the current stock price. Many academic studies show that dividends account for significant portions of long-term returns, with dividend contributions exceeding one-third of total returns in many cases.
Headquartered in Omaha, Union Pacific (UNP - Free Report) is a Transportation stock that has seen a price change of 16.01% so far this year. The railroad is currently shelling out a dividend of $1.38 per share, with a dividend yield of 2.06%. This compares to the Transportation - Rail industry's yield of 0.78% and the S&P 500's yield of 1.41%.
Looking at dividend growth, the company's current annualized dividend of $5.52 is up 1.5% from last year. Over the last 5 years, Union Pacific has increased its dividend 3 times on a year-over-year basis for an average annual increase of 7.19%. Looking ahead, future dividend growth will be dependent on earnings growth and payout ratio, which is the proportion of a company's annual earnings per share that it pays out as a dividend. Union Pacific's current payout ratio is 46%, meaning it paid out 46% of its trailing 12-month EPS as dividend.
UNP is expecting earnings to expand this fiscal year as well. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 is $12.55 per share, with earnings expected to increase 7.63% from the year ago period.
From greatly improving stock investing profits and reducing overall portfolio risk to providing tax advantages, investors like dividends for a variety of different reasons. But, not every company offers a quarterly payout.
Big, established firms that have more secure profits are often seen as the best dividend options, but it's fairly uncommon to see high-growth businesses or tech start-ups offer their stockholders a dividend. During periods of rising interest rates, income investors must be mindful that high-yielding stocks tend to struggle. With that in mind, UNP is a compelling investment opportunity. Not only is it a strong dividend play, but the stock currently sits at a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold).
Investors interested in Banks - Foreign stocks are likely familiar with Erste Group Bank AG (EBKDY - Free Report) and HDFC Bank (HDB - Free Report) . But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks? Let's take a closer look.
Everyone has their own methods for finding great value opportunities, but our model includes pairing an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system with a strong Zacks Rank. The proven Zacks Rank puts an emphasis on earnings estimates and estimate revisions, while our Style Scores work to identify stocks with specific traits.
Right now, Erste Group Bank AG is sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy), while HDFC Bank has a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold). This system places an emphasis on companies that have seen positive earnings estimate revisions, so investors should feel comfortable knowing that EBKDY is likely seeing its earnings outlook improve to a greater extent. But this is just one piece of the puzzle for value investors.
Value investors are also interested in a number of tried-and-true valuation metrics that help show when a company is undervalued at its current share price levels.
The Style Score Value grade factors in a variety of key fundamental metrics, including the popular P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, cash flow per share, and a number of other key stats that are commonly used by value investors.
EBKDY currently has a forward P/E ratio of 11.19, while HDB has a forward P/E of 15.17. We also note that EBKDY has a PEG ratio of 0.65. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. HDB currently has a PEG ratio of 1.19.
Another notable valuation metric for EBKDY is its P/B ratio of 1.3. Investors use the P/B ratio to look at a stock's market value versus its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. By comparison, HDB has a P/B of 1.91.
These metrics, and several others, help EBKDY earn a Value grade of B, while HDB has been given a Value grade of C.
EBKDY stands above HDB thanks to its solid earnings outlook, and based on these valuation figures, we also feel that EBKDY is the superior value option right now.
RTX (RTX - Free Report) appears an attractive pick, as it has been recently upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). This rating change essentially reflects an upward trend in earnings estimates -- one of the most powerful forces impacting stock prices.
The sole determinant of the Zacks rating is a company's changing earnings picture. The Zacks Consensus Estimate -- the consensus of EPS estimates from the sell-side analysts covering the stock -- for the current and following years is tracked by the system.
The power of a changing earnings picture in determining near-term stock price movements makes the Zacks rating system highly useful for individual investors, since it can be difficult to make decisions based on rating upgrades by Wall Street analysts. These are mostly driven by subjective factors that are hard to see and measure in real time.
As such, the Zacks rating upgrade for RTX is essentially a positive comment on its earnings outlook that could have a favorable impact on its stock price.
Most Powerful Force Impacting Stock PricesThe change in a company's future earnings potential, as reflected in earnings estimate revisions, and the near-term price movement of its stock are proven to be strongly correlated. The influence of institutional investors has a partial contribution to this relationship, as these big professionals use earnings and earnings estimates to calculate the fair value of a company's shares. An increase or decrease in earnings estimates in their valuation models simply results in higher or lower fair value for a stock, and institutional investors typically buy or sell it. Their transaction of large amounts of shares then leads to price movement for the stock.
Fundamentally speaking, rising earnings estimates and the consequent rating upgrade for RTX imply an improvement in the company's underlying business. Investors should show their appreciation for this improving business trend by pushing the stock higher.
Harnessing the Power of Earnings Estimate RevisionsAs empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock movements, tracking such revisions for making an investment decision could be truly rewarding. Here is where the tried-and-tested Zacks Rank stock-rating system plays an important role, as it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions.
The Zacks Rank stock-rating system, which uses four factors related to earnings estimates to classify stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive externally-audited track record, with Zacks Rank #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .
Earnings Estimate Revisions for RTXThis an aerospace and defense company is expected to earn $6.91 per share for the fiscal year ending December 2026, which represents no year-over-year change.
Analysts have been steadily raising their estimates for RTX. Over the past three months, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the company has increased 1.5%.
Bottom LineUnlike the overly optimistic Wall Street analysts whose rating systems tend to be weighted toward favorable recommendations, the Zacks rating system maintains an equal proportion of "buy" and "sell" ratings for its entire universe of more than 4,000 stocks at any point in time. Irrespective of market conditions, only the top 5% of the Zacks-covered stocks get a "Strong Buy" rating and the next 15% get a "Buy" rating. So, the placement of a stock in the top 20% of the Zacks-covered stocks indicates its superior earnings estimate revision feature, making it a solid candidate for producing market-beating returns in the near term.
You can learn more about the Zacks Rank here >>>
The upgrade of RTX to a Zacks Rank #2 positions it in the top 20% of the Zacks-covered stocks in terms of estimate revisions, implying that the stock might move higher in the near term.
Earlier this month, ServiceNow (NYSE:NOW | NOW Price Prediction) and IBM (NYSE:IBM) announced an expanded multi-year collaboration to make legacy enterprise systems “AI-ready,” integrating watsonx.data, Red Hat Ansible, Instana, HashiCorp Terraform and Vault, and IBM Bob into the ServiceNow AI Platform, with joint solutions expected in the second half of 2026.
David Bahnsen, Chief Investment Officer at The Bahnsen Group, appeared on CNBC’s Squawk Box this morning with a specific warning. His tell is more clinical. “I think a bubble gets ready to pop is when you start seeing companies have the good news everyone’s been talking about and cheerleading and then the stocks don’t respond,” he told CNBC.
The companies are still delivering. The buyers have stopped showing up at the price.
Price action in the AI bellwethers backs him up.
The Palantir and NVIDIA disconnect Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR | PLTR Price Prediction) just printed one of the cleanest quarters any large-cap software company has produced. Revenue grew 84.71% year over year to $1.63 billion, U.S. commercial revenue jumped 133%, and CEO Alex Karp announced a Rule of 40 score of 145%, a number he claimed only NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA), Micron (NASDAQ:MU), and SK Hynix can match. Management raised the full-year guide to roughly 71% growth. You can read the press release on the SEC’s site.
The stock filed at $144.45 on May 4 and has traded down to $116.86. Year to date PLTR is down 36.47%. Bahnsen on CNBC: “Palantir just had the two greatest quarters it’s ever going to have and the stock is down 50%. Nvidia has not moved in nine months.”
NVIDIA reported Q1 FY27 revenue of $81.6 billion, up 85.2% year over year, with Data Center at $75.25 billion and a Q2 guide of $91.0 billion. Yet over the past nine months, from September 29, 2025 through June 26, 2026, NVDA is up only 6.01%. For the most important compute platform on earth posting free cash flow growth of 74.51%, that is something close to a stall.
Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) follows the same pattern. AI semiconductor revenue grew 143% to $10.8 billion, with management guiding to $16.0 billion next quarter, up over 200% year over year. The stock filed at $495 on June 3, traded to $419.60 within an hour, and now sits near $373.90. Three companies, three blowouts, three weak responses.
The 50x-forever problem Bahnsen separates the chip from the multiple. “You don’t have to be a doubter in AI. You don’t have to be a doubter in even some of these individual companies.” Rather, you “just have to doubt that it’s worth 50 times earnings forever and ever,” he said on CNBC. PLTR currently trades at a P/E near 159x. That sets a high bar for the next decade of execution.
Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
His complaint about Wall Street’s S&P 500 targets near 7,800 applies the same logic at the index level. Those targets assume roughly 20x multiples and flawless earnings. “I think the forward earnings are not realistic. And I also think the assumptions of continued growth to rationalize even a lower multiple are very likely not realistic,” he told the show. The S&P is already up 8% year to date, much of that carried by the same names now stalling.
What Bahnsen actually predicts His call diverges from the usual perma-bear script. “I think you will have a moment in which things reprice. We saw it with dot com and you had five companies survive and you had 99% go to the graveyard,” he said, then walked it back from a timing call. “I’m not talking about timing anything. I’m just simply saying the investor psychology always 100% of the time gets ahead of itself.”
His base case for the next couple of years is a grind. “What I would say is a better prediction is that you wake up in a couple of years and you have a very muted return that along the way there’s rallies but there’s sell offs.” Margin debt at record levels gives him pause, though the composition differs from the 1999 retail mania.
Strong fundamentals do not mechanically beat starting valuations. If you own these names, the question is whether the next leg of earnings growth has already been priced in. Retail is starting to wonder out loud.
Reddit data shows Palantir sentiment flipping from a bullish 72 in early June to a very bearish 18 by June 3, triggered partly by a viral Michael Burry post calling the stock “a sand castle supported only by AI applications narrative.” Bahnsen would put it less colorfully. The good news stopped working, and that is the data point worth tracking.
Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC | INTC Price Prediction) stock is trading at $130.60 midday Monday, up 2% on the session. The move follows a major price-target hike from Cantor Fitzgerald, which raised its target on the shares to $150 from $90 while keeping its rating at Neutral.
That nuance matters. A supersized target without a rating change signals strong conviction in the AI infrastructure thesis while still flagging caution on Intel stock at these levels. INTC shares are up 249% year-to-date (YTD).
The question for investors chasing the move is direct. With earnings still under pressure and the chart vertical, is Intel stock genuinely cheap, or has the easy money on the turnaround already been made?
Cantor’s Bull Case Behind the $150 Target Cantor analyst C.J. Muse argues the AI infrastructure buildout is a generational semiconductor cycle, durable and extended by supply-chain constraints. He sees industry revenue reaching $3 trillion by CY29 and potentially exceeding $3.5 trillion by CY30. Inside that cycle, Muse views Intel as outperforming in the accelerator and compute market.
Cantor notes that smaller participants like Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL), Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD), and Intel have outperformed NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) in the accelerator market this year. The argument is straightforward: tight wafer supply, government reshoring incentives, and a CPU-anchored AI inference architecture all favor Intel’s positioning over the next several years.
Importantly, this $150 target is one firm’s call. The story reads as a Wall Street pivot, but the broader analyst community hasn’t followed in lockstep, and Cantor itself still rates the shares Neutral rather than Buy.
The Q1 FY2026 results offered some support. Intel posted revenue of $13.58 billion and non-GAAP EPS of $0.29, with Data Center and AI up 22% year over year and Intel Foundry revenue up 16%. Meanwhile, Intel’s non-GAAP gross margin expanded to 41%.
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan told investors that “the CPU is reinserting itself as the indispensable foundation of the AI era” and that the CPU-to-GPU deployment ratio has moved from 1-to-8 toward 1-to-4. New deals with Alphabet‘s (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Google and a slot as host CPU for NVIDIA’s DGX Rubin NVL8 systems reinforce the demand picture.
Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
The Bear Case Cuts the Other Way Wall Street as a group is far more cautious than the Cantor headline implies. The broader analyst consensus target on Intel stock sits at $96.07, below the current share price. Ratings skew heavily to Hold, with 31 Hold ratings against 12 combined Buy and Strong Buy and 5 combined Sell and Strong Sell.
The valuation on Intel stock is stretched on conventional metrics. Forward EPS of $0.60 implies a very high forward earnings multiple, and Intel’s quarterly earnings declined 72% year over year. Calling Intel stock cheap after a 249% YTD rally is a tough argument on traditional measures.
There’s also a quality-of-earnings issue. Intel’s Q1 FY2026 included a $4.07 billion restructuring charge tied to a Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) goodwill impairment, producing a sizable GAAP net loss even as non-GAAP results impressed. The gap between operational momentum at Intel and reported profitability remains wide.
What Investors Can Watch Next The next material checkpoint is Intel’s Q2 FY2026 report. Management has guided to revenue of $13.8 billion to $14.8 billion and non-GAAP EPS of $0.20. A beat would extend Tan’s streak of six consecutive quarters of revenue above expectations.
The real swing factor is Intel’s foundry business. Investors can watch for whether Intel converts its 18A and 14A node momentum into named external customers, since that binary outcome largely separates Cantor’s bullish target from the cautious consensus near $96.
The takeaway is informational rather than prescriptive. Intel stock is hard to label as cheap after this run, and the bull case rests on a forward bet that the AI cycle drives earnings far above today’s run rate. Cantor’s higher target reflects that optimism.
The still-Neutral rating, the below-price consensus, and the cautious model read are meaningful counterweights for Intel stock. Investors should consider keeping their position sizes modest given the stock’s volatility profile. Both the generational AI thesis and the stretched valuation deserve weight before any change in exposure.
Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
Pan American Silver Corp (NYSE:PAAS) has seen choppy trading this year, most recently pulling back to familiar support at the $44 level. A fresh, strong bullish signal has the shares looking at a strong bounce off this region, however.
According to Schaeffer's Senior Quantitative Analyst Rocky White, PAAS is trading within 0.75 times the 260-day moving average's 20-day average true range (ATR), after spending at least 80% of the previous two weeks and 80% of the prior 42 trading sessions above that trendline. This setup has appeared nine times over the last decade, after which the stock was higher one month later 100% of the time, averaging a large 15.4% gain. A similar move from the stock's current perch at $44.61 would have it trading at $51.47.
An unwinding of pessimism amongst options traders could provide a tailwind as well. PAAS' 50-day put/call volume ratio of 2.71 at the International Securities Exchange (ISE), Cboe Options Exchange (CBOE), and NASDAQ OMX PHLX (PHLX) ranks higher htan 90% of readings from the past year, showing puts being picked up at a much faster-than-usual rate.
Investors looking for stocks in the REIT and Equity Trust - Other sector might want to consider either Alpine Income (PINE - Free Report) or Omega Healthcare Investors (OHI - Free Report) . But which of these two stocks is more attractive to value investors? We'll need to take a closer look to find out.
Everyone has their own methods for finding great value opportunities, but our model includes pairing an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system with a strong Zacks Rank. The Zacks Rank is a proven strategy that targets companies with positive earnings estimate revision trends, while our Style Scores work to grade companies based on specific traits.
Alpine Income and Omega Healthcare Investors are sporting Zacks Ranks of #2 (Buy) and #3 (Hold), respectively, right now. This means that PINE's earnings estimate revision activity has been more impressive, so investors should feel comfortable with its improving analyst outlook. But this is only part of the picture for value investors.
Value investors also try to analyze a wide range of traditional figures and metrics to help determine whether a company is undervalued at its current share price levels.
The Value category of the Style Scores system identifies undervalued companies by looking at a number of key metrics. These include the long-favored P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, cash flow per share, and a variety of other fundamentals that help us determine a company's fair value.
PINE currently has a forward P/E ratio of 9.78, while OHI has a forward P/E of 14.89. We also note that PINE has a PEG ratio of 1.40. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. OHI currently has a PEG ratio of 1.97.
Another notable valuation metric for PINE is its P/B ratio of 1.03. The P/B ratio pits a stock's market value against its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. For comparison, OHI has a P/B of 2.62.
Based on these metrics and many more, PINE holds a Value grade of B, while OHI has a Value grade of C.
PINE stands above OHI thanks to its solid earnings outlook, and based on these valuation figures, we also feel that PINE is the superior value option right now.
Key Takeaways Palo Alto Networks partnered with IBM and Red Hat to speed protection against software vulnerabilities.PANW teamed up with Deutsche Telekom to launch Sovereign Cortex for regulated European industries.PANW's partnerships expand AI security capabilities and support broader enterprise customer opportunities. Palo Alto Networks (PANW - Free Report) is using strategic partnerships to expand its AI security platform and address new cybersecurity challenges. Rapid adoption of AI by enterprises requires the need for better protection against cyber threats and solutions that meet regulatory requirements. The company's recent partnerships with IBM, Red Hat and Deutsche Telekom support the above-mentioned goals as they expand PANW's security capabilities, while helping the company reach new customer segments.
PANW's partnership with IBM and Red Hat focuses on reducing the time between vulnerability discovery and protection. AI has made it possible to identify software vulnerabilities much faster, giving attackers less time to exploit them before organizations apply software patches. Under the partnership, PANW's Virtual Patching technology can immediately block attacks at the network level, while IBM and Red Hat's Project Lightwell provide software fixes that customers can test and deploy later. The solution also expands protection across open-source software, commercial applications, operational technology and healthcare systems.
The partnership with Deutsche Telekom is aimed at regulated industries in Europe. The companies launched Sovereign Cortex with T Security, an AI-driven security operations platform with additional data sovereignty controls. The solution provides European data residency, Europe-based support, encryption key controls and audited access logs to help organizations comply with regulations such as GDPR, NIS2 and DORA. The solution is scheduled to be released in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 and is initially targeted at customers in healthcare, financial services, the public sector and critical infrastructure.
The above-mentioned strategic partnerships strengthen different parts of PANW's business. The IBM and Red Hat partnership strengthens PANW's vulnerability management capabilities, while the Deutsche Telekom partnership expands PANW's presence in regulated European markets. Together, these partnerships should strengthen PANW's AI security platform, while creating additional opportunities for the company to win enterprise customers as AI adoption continues to grow.
How Competitors Fare Against PANWCompetitors like CrowdStrike (CRWD - Free Report) and SentinelOne (S - Free Report) are also gaining ground through platform expansion and AI innovation.
CrowdStrike ended its first quarter of fiscal 2027 with $5.51 billion in ARR, reflecting 24% year-over-year growth. The robust increase was fueled by the growing adoption of CrowdStrike’s Falcon Flex subscription model.
Though comparatively a small competitor, SentinelOne posted first-quarter fiscal 2027 year-over-year growth of 23% in its ARR. The growth was fueled by the rising adoption of SentinelOne’s AI-first Singularity platform and Purple AI.
PANW’s Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesShares of Palo Alto Networks have jumped 65.1% in the year-to-date period compared with the Zacks Security industry’s return of 49.8%.
PANW’s YTD Price Return Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Palo Alto Networks trades at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 18.35X compared with the industry’s average of 16.34X. The Zacks Value Score of F also suggests that PANW stock is overvalued.
PANW Forward 12-Month P/S Ratio
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Palo Alto Networks’ fiscal 2026 and 2027 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 12.9% and 8.1%, respectively. The estimates for fiscal 2026 and 2027 have been revised up by 6 cents and 8 cents, respectively, over the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Palo Alto Networks currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Roblox To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Roblox between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 29, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Roblox Corporation ("Roblox" or the "Company") (NYSE: RBLX) and reminds investors of the August 7, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Watch our latest video highlighting the key allegations: https://youtu.be/rFoJC-j0rW0
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Roblox's organic growth potential; notably, that Roblox would see a significant slowdown in its growth rates as enrollment in the age verification rollout would quickly taper, compounding the resulting slowdown in on-platform communication, resulting in app store rating reductions and a swift reduction in organic growth. Such statements absent these material facts caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase Roblox's securities at artificially inflated prices.
On April 30, 2026, Roblox announced its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2026. Management slashed bookings growth guidance down to 8-12% and a corresponding decline to margin expectations. Defendants disclosed the age verification rollout had caused much more significant impacts engagement and organic growth than management had previously suggested and age check adoption had only increased to 51% global daily active users, from 45% at the end of the previous quarter.
Investors and analysts reacted immediately to Roblox's revelation. The price of Roblox's common stock declined dramatically. From a closing market price of $55.26 per share on April 30, 2026, Roblox's stock price fell to $45.13 per share on May 1, 2026, a decline of about 18.33% in the span of just a single day.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Roblox's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Verra class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/RBLX or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Roblox Corporation Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Roblox Corporation securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Roblox Corporation securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that the Company's age verification rollout would cause a significant slowdown in growth rates, reduce on-platform communication, lead to app store rating reductions, and materially impair Roblox's organic growth potential. As the truth emerged on April 30, 2026 - when Roblox announced Q1 fiscal 2026 results, slashed bookings growth guidance to just 8-12%, disclosed margin deterioration, and revealed that age verification adoption had only reached 51% of global daily active users (up from just 45% the prior quarter), signaling far greater engagement impacts than management had previously suggested - RBLX's stock price fell from $55.26 to $45.13 per share, a decline of approximately 18.33% in a single day, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Roblox Corporation class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Roblox Corporation (RBLX) securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 - the Class Period - and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Roblox securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Roblox employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Roblox Corporation lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Roblox Corporation class action is a court-appointed investor - typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case - who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Roblox investor who purchased RBLX securities during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is August 7, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Roblox Corporation stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Roblox Corporation (RBLX) securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Roblox Corporation securities class action is August 7, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/RBLX for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303285
Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Key Takeaways STM is growing its automotive sensing business with new design wins and the NXP MEMS acquisition.NXPI is gaining traction in software-defined vehicles with processors, radar and automotive Ethernet products.Both companies are expanding AI and automotive offerings while expecting higher 2026 sales growth. The automotive semiconductor market is evolving rapidly as vehicles become more connected, software-driven and electrified. Growing adoption of advanced driver assistance systems, electric vehicles, smart sensors and in-vehicle connectivity is creating long-term growth opportunities for chipmakers with strong automotive businesses.
Against this backdrop, STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM - Free Report) and NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NXPI - Free Report) have established themselves as key suppliers to global automakers, providing a broad range of chips that power next-generation vehicles. While both companies are well positioned to benefit from these industry trends, differences in their product offerings, customer exposure, financial performance and growth strategies make the investment choice less straightforward. So, which stock stands out as the better pick now?
The Case for STMSTMicroelectronics is strengthening its position in the automotive semiconductor market through a combination of product innovation and strategic expansion. During the first quarter, the company reported a return to year-over-year growth in automotive revenues and highlighted strong design activity with global automakers and Tier 1 suppliers. New wins across electric vehicles, hybrid platforms and traditional internal combustion models covered onboard chargers, powertrain systems, active suspension, vehicle control electronics and automotive sensors. The acquisition of NXPI's MEMS sensor business further expands STMicroelectronics' automotive sensing capabilities by adding complementary technologies, broadening its product portfolio and deepening customer relationships.
Beyond automotive, STMicroelectronics is benefiting from several high-growth technology trends that can support long-term earnings expansion. Management pointed to strong booking momentum across all end markets, normalized channel inventories and rising demand tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure. The company expects AI-related revenues to exceed $500 million in 2026 and surpass $1 billion in 2027, supported by silicon photonics, power semiconductors, microcontrollers and optical connectivity solutions. A multiyear commercial engagement with Amazon Web Services and collaborations with NVIDIA further reinforce ST's growing role in next-generation AI data centers and intelligent robotics.
STMicroelectronics also appears well-positioned to improve profitability as demand recovers. Management expects double-digit revenue growth in 2026, backed by stronger bookings, expanding customer programs and increasing AI opportunities. Gross margin is projected to improve sequentially throughout the year as factory utilization rises, product mix becomes more favorable and manufacturing efficiency gradually improves. At the same time, the company continues to invest in advanced manufacturing, silicon carbide and next-generation technologies that should strengthen its competitive position and support sustainable growth over the coming years.
The Case for NXPINXP Semiconductors continues to strengthen its leadership in automotive chips by capitalizing on the industry's transition toward software-defined vehicles, advanced driver assistance systems and vehicle electrification. During the first quarter, the company delivered automotive revenue growth driven by rising demand for its processing platforms, radar solutions and automotive Ethernet products. Management highlighted strong customer adoption of its next-generation S32N and S32K5 processors, which are expected to become the foundation of future vehicle architectures. New design wins across radar, connectivity and zonal computing also expand semiconductor content per vehicle and reinforce NXP Semiconductors' long-term growth prospects in the automotive market.
Beyond automotive, NXP Semiconductors is benefiting from powerful secular trends in industrial automation, physical AI and data center infrastructure. The company reported robust growth in Industrial and IoT, supported by strong demand for its latest processing platforms and increasing customer commitments to AI-enabled edge computing. Management also expects its data center business to more than double this year as customers adopt NXPI solutions for power management, cooling, networking and secure control applications. These opportunities diversify the company's revenue base while creating additional avenues for sustained growth.
NXPI's financial outlook also reflects improving business momentum and disciplined execution. Management expects broad-based growth across all major end markets in the second quarter, supported by strengthening order visibility and expanding customer adoption of its differentiated products. At the same time, the company projects further gross margin expansion through higher factory utilization, a richer product mix and operational efficiencies while maintaining its long-term commitment to shareholder returns through dividends and share repurchases. These factors position NXP Semiconductors to deliver profitable growth while remaining focused on long-term value creation.
How Does the Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for STM & NXPI?The Zacks Consensus Estimate for STM’s 2026 sales implies a 21.6% year-over-year increase. The consensus estimate for earnings per share for 2026 is $1.17, compared with 53 cents reported in 2025. Earnings estimates for the current year have increased in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NXPI’s 2026 sales and EPS implies year-over-year growth of 14.3% and 25.2%, respectively. Earnings estimates for 2026 have remained stable in the past 30 days.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance & ValuationSTM stock has surged 134.8% in the past year compared with the S&P 500’s growth of 21.8%. Conversely, NXPI’s shares have risen 26.8% in the same time frame.
Price Performance
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
STM is trading at a forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio of 36.78X, above its median of 25.35X over the last year. NXPI’s forward earnings multiple sits at 18.71X, down from its median of 19.06X over the same time frame.
P/E (F12M)
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
End NotesBoth STMicroelectronics and NXP Semiconductors are well positioned to benefit from the growing demand for automotive chips, backed by expanding product portfolios, strong design wins and exposure to long-term trends such as vehicle electrification and software-defined vehicles.
However, STMicroelectronics appears to hold a slight edge at present. The company is expected to deliver stronger revenue and earnings growth, supported by its expanding presence in automotive sensing, silicon carbide and AI infrastructure. The company has also seen upward revisions to earnings expectations, reflecting improving confidence in its near-term outlook. Although STM trades at a richer valuation following the strong share price rally, its superior growth profile and favorable earnings momentum justify the premium.
STMicroelectronics sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), while NXP Semiconductors has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), making the former a slightly more attractive choice for investors seeking exposure to the automotive semiconductor space. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Strategy (MSTR) rose 5.27% in premarket despite the Bitcoin treasury company announcing a Digital Credit Capital Framework that allows it to sell Bitcoin. The b
, /PRNewswire/ -- Class Action Attorney Juan Monteverde with Monteverde & Associates PC (the "M&A Class Action Firm"), has recovered millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as a Top 50 Firm in the 2025 ISS Securities Class Action Services Report. The firm is headquartered at the Empire State Building in New York City and is investigating Iridium Communications Inc. (NASDAQ: IRDM) related to its sale to Rocket Lab Corporation. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Iridium shareholders are expected to receive $27.00 in cash and a number of shares of Rocket Lab common stock calculated pursuant to an exchange ratio. Is it a fair deal?
Click here for more info https://monteverdelaw.com/case/iridium-communications-inc/. It is free and there is no cost or obligation to you.
NOT ALL LAW FIRMS ARE EQUAL. Before you hire a law firm, you should talk to a lawyer and ask:
Do you file class actions and go to Court? When was the last time you recovered money for shareholders? What cases did you recover money in and how much? About Monteverde & Associates PC
Our firm litigates and has recovered money for shareholders…and we do it from our offices in the Empire State Building. We are a national class action securities firm with a successful track record in trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
No one is above the law. If you own common stock in the above listed company and have concerns or wish to obtain additional information free of charge, please visit our website or contact Juan Monteverde, Esq. either via e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (212) 971-1341.
Contact:
Juan Monteverde, Esq.
MONTEVERDE & ASSOCIATES PC
The Empire State Building
350 Fifth Ave. Suite 4740
New York, NY 10118
United States of America
[email protected]
Tel: (212) 971-1341
Attorney Advertising. (C) 2026 Monteverde & Associates PC. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Monteverde & Associates PC (www.monteverdelaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome with respect to any future matter.
Insiders may stand to receive substantial financial benefits not available to ordinary shareholders.
The proposed transactions may contain terms that could limit superior competing offers.
Shareholders are encouraged to contact the firm to discuss their rights and options at no cost or obligation. We would handle any matter on a contingent fee basis, whereby you would not be responsible for out-of-pocket payment of our legal fees or expenses.
, /PRNewswire/ -- Halper Sadeh LLC, an investor rights law firm, is investigating the following companies for potential violations of the federal securities laws and/or breaches of fiduciary duties to shareholders relating to:
Iridium Communications Inc. (NASDAQ: IRDM)'s sale to Rocket Lab Corporation for $27.00 in cash and a number of shares of Rocket Lab common stock calculated pursuant to an exchange ratio for each share of Iridium. If you are an Iridium shareholder, click here to learn more about your rights and options.
Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBPH)'s sale to Zymeworks Inc. for $17.00 per share. If you are a Theravance shareholder, click here to learn more about your rights and options.
Synaptics Incorporated (NASDAQ: SYNA)'s sale to onsemi for 1.350 shares of onsemi common stock for each Synaptics share. If you are a Synaptics shareholder, click here to learn more about your rights and options.
Bio-Techne Corporation (NASDAQ: TECH)'s sale to Merck KGaA for $73.00 per share in cash. If you are a Bio-Techne shareholder, click here to learn more about your rights and options.
On behalf of shareholders, Halper Sadeh LLC may seek increased consideration, additional disclosures and information, or other relief and benefits.
Halper Sadeh LLC represents investors all over the world who have fallen victim to securities fraud and corporate misconduct. Our attorneys have been instrumental in implementing corporate reforms and recovering millions of dollars on behalf of defrauded investors.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:
Halper Sadeh LLC
Daniel Sadeh, Esq.
Zachary Halper, Esq.
One World Trade Center
85th Floor
New York, NY 10007
(212) 763-0060
[email protected]
[email protected]
https://www.halpersadeh.com
Key Takeaways PLUG is gaining from electrolyzer demand, while FLUX faces order delays and weak sales.Plug Power's electrolyzer pipeline exceeds $8B, but cash fell 39% in Q1 2026.Flux Power posted a 60.5% revenue drop in Q3 FY26 amid tariffs and lower volumes. Plug Power Inc. (PLUG - Free Report) and Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX - Free Report) are well-known names in the clean energy space. Both companies are engaged in developing advanced energy solutions for commercial and industrial equipment worldwide.
Plug Power continues to capitalize on opportunities in the expanding green hydrogen market, while Flux Power is benefiting from robust demand for sustainable energy storage solutions in the material handling industry. Which of these companies has the stronger upside potential? Let us take a detailed look at their fundamentals, growth drivers and challenges to find out.
The Case for PLUGPlug Power's first-quarter 2026 results continued to show signs of improvement. After growing12.9% in 2025, PLUG’s revenues surged 22% year over year in the quarter. Revenues were driven by an increase in demand for its electrolyzer product line and a volume increase in hydrogen fuel sales. In the quarter, revenues from the electrolyzer product line rose steeply approximately 345% on a year-over-year basis.
The robust growth was fueled by rising demand for the company's GenEco proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers in the industrial and energy markets. The company has more than 320 MW of electrolyzer capacity deployed worldwide and more than $8 billion in project pipeline across industrial and energy applications. With strong expertise in providing and installing electrolyzers, Plug Power is well-positioned to capitalize on the increasing demand for renewable fuels and green ammonia globally.
Also, last month, PLUG secured a contract for supplying 30 MW of GenEco PEM electrolyzers for the industrial hydrogen production plant located in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria. The project will deploy PLUG’s six 5 MW GenEco PEM electrolyzers for the production of green hydrogen.
Also, in April, Plug Power finalized one of the largest electrolyzer project deals in its history. The company received the Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) contract from Hy2gen Canada to deliver a 275 MW GenEco PEM electrolyzer system for the latter’s “Courant” decarbonized ammonium nitrate project.
PLUG’s Project Quantum Leap is also enabling it to boost its cash flow and reduce its cash burn rate. As part of the project, it is benefiting from sales growth, pricing actions, inventory and capex management, and increased leverage of its hydrogen production platform.
However, a key challenge facing Plug Power is its continued inability to generate positive gross margins and cash flows. In the first quarter, the company reported a negative gross margin of 13%, while operating cash outflow amounted to $150 million.
Plug Power's liquidity position also remains a concern. The company ended the first quarter of 2026 with cash equivalents of $223.2 million, down 39% from the level at 2025-end.
The Case for Flux PowerFlux Power has been witnessing a decline in customer orders due to delays in new orders for its energy storage solutions, reflecting deferrals of new forklift purchases by certain large customer fleet amid lower capital spending and global tariff uncertainties. Tariffs have also negatively impacted the company’s revenues, profitability and cash flows. These factors hurt the company’s performance in the third quarter of fiscal 2026 (ended March 31, 2026), with revenues declining 60.5% year over year. Lower volumes in the material handling and airport ground support equipment markets further weighed on results.
Flux Power has been dealing with the adverse impacts of lower volumes and pricing pressures. In the third quarter of fiscal 2026 (ended March 2026), cost of sales declined 58.2% year over year, but gross profit fell 66%. Although the company lowered expenses through labor and overhead cost reductions, it continued to face profitability challenges. It reported an operating loss of $3 million in the quarter, wider than the prior-year quarter's operating loss of $1.6 million.
Also, given its weak liquidity position, the company has continued to rely on debt and equity financing to fund operations. As of March 31, 2026, Flux Power had an accumulated deficit of $111.5 million and cash and cash equivalents of only $0.4 million. During the first nine months of fiscal 2026, the company used $5.7 million in operating activities and incurred a net loss of $5.1 million.
Despite these headwinds, the company remains focused on improving profitability through cost-reduction, sourcing and pricing recovery initiatives. Flux Power also continues to invest in research and development and expand its portfolio of advanced lithium-ion energy storage solutions. With increasing electrification trends across industrial and commercial sectors, demand for lithium-ion and environmentally friendly energy storage solutions should support FLUX’s long-term growth prospects.
How Does the Zacks Consensus Estimate Compare for PLUG & FLUX?The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PLUG’s 2026 sales is $812.5 million, implying year-over-year growth of 14.5%. The consensus estimate for its bottom line is pegged at a loss of 35 cents per share.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for FLUX’s fiscal 2026 (ending June 2026) sales is approximately $41.8 million, indicating a decline of 37.1% year over year. The consensus estimate for its bottom line is pegged at a loss of 34 cents per share.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Price Performance and Valuation of PLUG & FLUXIn the past six months, shares of Plug Power have soared 30.9%, while Flux Power stock has declined 39.9%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, both PLUG and FLUX are trading at a negative forward price-to-earnings ratio.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
ConclusionDespite PLUG's ongoing challenges related to negative gross margins, cash burn and a weakening liquidity position, its strong presence in the green hydrogen market, expanding electrolyzer business, robust project pipeline and cost-saving initiatives under Project Quantum Leap are expected to support its long-term growth prospects. On the other hand, Flux Power continues to grapple with weak customer demand, lower sales volumes, pricing pressures, persistent operating losses and a fragile liquidity position, which are likely to weigh on its near-term performance.
Considering the long-term growth prospects, expanding market opportunities and recent revenue momentum, PLUG appears to be a better investment choice than FLUX at present. While PLUG currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), FLUX has a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Key Takeaways CNI's 2025 Sustainability Data Supplement highlights ESG progress across key business priorities.CNI advanced toward its 2030 emissions goals while improving safety and workforce representation.CNI earned recognition from major ESG organizations, reflecting continued sustainability execution. Canadian National Railway (CNI - Free Report) reinforced its commitment to sustainable growth with the release of its 2025 Sustainability Data Supplement, highlighting progress in environmental stewardship, safety, workforce development, community engagement and governance. The report demonstrates that sustainability remains an integral part of CNI's long-term business strategy, supporting operational excellence and creating lasting value for shareholders and other stakeholders.
A key highlight of the report is CNI's continued progress toward its 2030 emissions-reduction targets, along with improvements in safety performance and workforce representation. By investing in operational efficiency and reducing its environmental footprint, CNI is strengthening its competitive position while meeting the evolving expectations of customers, regulators and investors.
The company also received recognition from several leading ESG rating agencies and sustainability organizations, including continued inclusion in the Dow Jones Best-in-Class indices, Corporate Knights' Best 50 Corporate Citizens in Canada, an MSCI ESG "AA" rating, a CDP Climate Change score of "B," and an EcoVadis Silver medal. These accolades reflect CNI's consistent execution of its sustainability strategy and reinforce its position among companies focused on responsible business practices.
Overall, CNI's latest sustainability update highlights steady execution of its long-term ESG priorities. Through transparent reporting and continued investments in emissions reduction, safety and governance, the company is well positioned to support sustainable business growth while enhancing long-term shareholder value.
CNI’s Share Price PerformanceCNI’s shares have gained 22% over the past year compared with the Transportation - Rail industry’s 18.9% growth.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CNI’s Zacks RankCNI currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Stocks to ConsiderInvestors interested in the Zacks Transportation sector may consider Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD - Free Report) and Teekay Tankers Ltd (TNK - Free Report) .
EXPD currently sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Expeditors has an expected earnings growth rate of 11.9% for 2026. The company has an encouraging earnings surprise history. Its earnings outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average beat of 13.96%.
Teekay Tankers Ltd currently sports a Zacks Rank #1.
TNK has an expected earnings growth rate of 98% for the current year. The company has an encouraging earnings surprise history. Its earnings topped the Zacks Consensus Estimate in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average beat of 10.2%.
Key Takeaways CCJ Q1 2026 adjusted EBITDA rose 44% YoY to CAD 509M ($372M).CCJ EBITDA growth driven by uranium price strength and Westinghouse, with 2025 EBITDA up 26% to CAD 1.93B.CCJ fuel services EBITDA fell 28% in Q1 2026 as prices dropped; Westinghouse 2026 EBITDA seen $370-$430M. Cameco Corporation’s (CCJ - Free Report) adjusted EBITDA has shown a strong and sustained upward trajectory over the past few years, driven primarily by uranium price strength and contributions from Westinghouse.
In the first quarter of 2026, adjusted EBITDA rose 44% year over year to CAD 509 million ($372 million). This follows a strong 2025 performance, during which adjusted EBITDA rose 26% year over year to CAD 1.93 billion ($1.41 billion). Over a longer horizon, profitability has expanded materially, with adjusted EBITDA rising more than fourfold from CAD 431 million in 2022 to CAD 1.93 billion in 2025.
The uranium segment remains the primary engine of EBITDA growth. In 2025, adjusted EBITDA increased 6% year over year to CAD 1.26 billion ($ 0.92 billion). This was supported by a 7% rise in revenues driven by a 9% increase in average realized uranium prices in Canadian dollar terms, somewhat offset by a 2% dip in sales volumes. Total cost of sales (including depreciation and amortization) increased 3%.
Momentum strengthened further in the first quarter of 2026, when uranium revenues rose 15% to CAD 712 ($520 million) on higher volumes and prices. Cost of sales (including D&A) increased 9%. Adjusted EBITDA for the segment rose 48% year over year to CAD 423 million ($309 million).
The fuel services segment delivered strong growth in 2025 but showed some normalization in early 2026. In 2025, adjusted EBITDA increased 51% to CAD 219 million ($160 million). Revenues were up 22% for the year, attributed to a 14% increase in realized pricing. Total cost of products and services sold (including D&A) increased 10%.
However, in the first quarter of 2026, adjusted EBITDA declined 28% to CAD 54 million ($39 million). Revenues dipped 1% with higher volumes being offset by a 17% decline in average realized prices. Total cost of products and services sold (including D&A) increased 35%, weighing on the profitability in the quarter.
Westinghouse has emerged as a rapidly growing contributor to Cameco’s overall EBITDA profile. In 2025, adjusted EBITDA from Westinghouse increased 61% to CAD 780 million ($572 million) in 2025. This reflects the increase in Cameco’s share of Westinghouse’s second-quarter revenues tied to the Dukovany construction project. In the first quarter of 2026, adjusted EBITDA was CAD 122 million ($89 million), up 33% year over year. Management expects continued momentum, with 2026 guidance indicating Cameco’s share of Westinghouse’s adjusted EBITDA between $370 million and $430 million.
Looking ahead, Cameco’s EBITDA growth is expected to remain supported by sustained strength in uranium pricing, driven by structurally tight supply conditions and rising nuclear energy demand tied to energy security and decarbonization goals. The fuel services segment is expected to remain a stable contributor, supported by consistent conversion demand and improving pricing dynamics.
Westinghouse represents an increasingly important long-term growth driver, offering exposure to global reactor restarts and nuclear construction pipelines. The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Dominance Financing (EDF) recently announced a conditional commitment of up to $17.5 billion in loan facilities to support investment in U.S. nuclear reactors. This is expected to provide the majority of the financing for Westinghouse to purchase the long-lead time items for up to 10 AP1000 nuclear reactors in the United States. The DOE financing package, combined with previous U.S. government initiatives supporting nuclear power, could create substantial opportunities for both Westinghouse and Cameco.
CCJ’s Price Performance, Valuation & EstimatesIn the past year, Cameco shares have gained 40.7% compared with the industry’s 21.3% growth. Uranium peers Energy Fuels (UUUU - Free Report) gained 154.2% while Centrus Energy (LEU - Free Report) dipped 9.7%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
CCJ stock is trading at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 17.92 compared with the industry’s 5.21. Energy Fuels is trading higher at 19.93, while Centrus Energy is trading lower at 6.76.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Cameco’s earnings for 2026 of $1.21 per share indicates year-over-year growth of 17.5%. The same for 2027 implies growth of 58.7%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The consensus estimate for Cameco’s earnings for 2026 has moved up over the past 60 days, while the same for 2027 has moved down, as shown in the chart below.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The company currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
LOS ANGELES, June 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP reminds investors of the upcoming July 28, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Lucid Group, Inc. (“Lucid” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LCID) securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR LUCID INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.
What Happened?
On April 3, 2026, Lucid announced its first quarter 2026 production and delivery totals, revealing that is had “produced 5,500 vehicles” but only “delivered 3,093 vehicles.” The Company explained that “deliveries of the Lucid Gravity were disrupted for 29 days due to a supplier quality issue with the second-row seats” and, “[a]s a result of this, the company’s ability to meet customer demand was impacted.”
The same day, Reuters published an article regarding Lucid’s delivery results, noting that deliveries had been impacted over a month earlier in February 2026 when Lucid paused to reverse an unauthorized supplier change and inspect vehicles already produced.
Then, on April 6, 2026, 24/7 Wall St. published an article stating that Lucid “cannot sell fewer than 4,000 vehicles and even pretend this is sustainable.”
On this news, Lucid’s stock price fell $1.13, or 11.35%, over two consecutive trading days, to close at $8.83 per share on April 7, 2026, thereby injuring investors.
Then, on April 14, 2026, Lucid released preliminary first quarter 2026 financial results, including revenue in the range of $280 million to $284 million, missing consensus estimates of $433.8 million, and losses from operations in the range of $985 million to $1.005 billion. The Company also revealed plans for a $1.05 billion capital raise, including a $300 million public stock offering.
On this news, Lucid’s stock price fell $0.44, or 4.76%, to close at $8.80 per share on April 14, 2026.
Then, on May 5, 2026, Lucid released its first quarter 2026 financial results, reporting GAAP earnings per share of -$3.46, missing consensus estimates by $0.83, a net loss of over $1 billion, and revenue of $282.47 million, missing consensus estimates by $76.04 million. The Company explained that the “supplier issue . . . during the quarter had an impact,” while also acknowledging that it “ended the quarter with elevated inventory[.]”
On this news, Lucid’s stock price fell $0.50, or 7.47%, over two consecutive trading days, to close at $6.19 per share on May 6, 2026, thereby injuring investors further.
What Is The Lawsuit About?
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (2) the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company’s business and financial results; (3) accordingly, the Defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid’s manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Lucid securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than July 28, 2026 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit.
Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:
If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:
Charles Linehan, Esq.,
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100,
Los Angeles California 90067
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150,
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at www.glancylaw.com.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.
If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.
To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Contact Us:
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Charles Linehan
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at: www.glancylaw.com.
NEW YORK, June 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- IMPORTANT DATE: July 28, 2026. Investors who purchased Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 and wish to seek appointment as lead plaintiff must file a motion by this date. Start your claim now before the deadline. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.
LCID shares lost 0.44 per share (4.76%) on April 14, 2026 when preliminary Q1 revenue of 284 million fell $150 million short of consensus expectations. A securities class action is now pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
What Is a Lead Plaintiff?
Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the lead plaintiff is the shareholder or group of shareholders appointed by the court to represent the interests of the entire class. In the LCID action, the lead plaintiff will direct litigation strategy, approve major decisions, and work with lead counsel to maximize recovery for all class members who purchased shares during the February 25 to April 13, 2026 Class Period.
Lead Plaintiff Facts
The court typically appoints the applicant with the largest financial interest in the relief soughtLead plaintiff applicants must demonstrate they purchased LCID securities during the Class Period and suffered lossesServing as lead plaintiff does not require any out-of-pocket payment or upfront costThe lead plaintiff is not personally liable for legal fees if the case is unsuccessfulLead plaintiffs receive the same per-share recovery as all other class members, plus reimbursement of reasonable costsMultiple investors may apply jointly as a lead plaintiff group Post-Deadline Procedures
After the July 28, 2026 deadline passes, the court will review all competing motions and select a lead plaintiff. This process typically takes 30 to 60 days. Once appointed, the lead plaintiff selects lead counsel, and the litigation proceeds through discovery, class certification, and ultimately trial or settlement.
Absent Class Member Rights
Investors who do not apply for lead plaintiff status are not excluded from the case. Absent class members retain full rights to participate in any recovery. No action is required before the deadline to preserve your ability to share in a future settlement or judgment. The deadline applies only to those seeking the lead plaintiff role.
Find out if you qualify to recover losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.
"The lead plaintiff process is designed to ensure the class is represented by shareholders with substantial interests. In the Lucid case, where alleged concealment of a supplier quality crisis preceded over $150 million in missed revenue expectations, investors with significant losses should evaluate whether lead plaintiff appointment serves their interests." -- Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP | Top 50 Securities Firm | (212) 363-7500 | www.zlk.com
Frequently Asked Questions About the LCID Lawsuit
Q: What is a lead plaintiff and why does it matter? A: A lead plaintiff is the investor appointed by the court to represent the entire class. Lead plaintiffs are typically investors with the largest documented losses. Being appointed does not increase individual recovery but gives direct oversight of how the case is run.
Q: How do I know if I lost enough money to be the lead plaintiff? A: There is no minimum loss threshold. Courts appoint the investor with the largest provable loss who is willing and able to represent the class adequately. Contact Levi & Korsinsky before July 28, 2026 to evaluate.
Q: What do LCID investors need to do right now? A: Gather brokerage records including purchase dates, share quantities, and prices paid. Contact Levi & Korsinsky for a free, no-obligation evaluation at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500. No immediate action is required to remain eligible as a class member.
Q: What if I already sold my LCID shares -- can I still recover losses? A: Yes. Eligibility is based on when you purchased, not whether you still hold them. Investors who bought during the class period and sold at a loss may still participate.
Q: What if I missed the lead plaintiff deadline? A: The deadline applies only to investors seeking lead plaintiff appointment. Class members who miss it can still participate in any settlement or recovery.
Q: What does it cost me to participate? A: Nothing. Securities class actions are handled on a pure contingency basis. No upfront fees, no retainer, no out-of-pocket costs.
CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004 [email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Lucid Group To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Lucid Group between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 29, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Lucid Group, Inc. ("Lucid Group" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: LCID) and reminds investors of the July 28, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (2) the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company's business and financial results; (3) accordingly, the Defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid's manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Lucid Group's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Lucid Group class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/LCID or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Lucid Group, Inc. Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Lucid Group securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Lucid Group securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity SUV and overstating the Company's manufacturing and delivery capabilities. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures - including an April 3, 2026 announcement that only 3,093 vehicles were delivered in Q1 2026 due to a 29-day delivery disruption caused by a supplier seat defect, an April 14, 2026 filing revealing Q1 revenue of just $280-$284 million against a consensus estimate of $433.8 million and a $1.05 billion capital raise, and a May 5, 2026 earnings report showing a net loss of over $1 billion and GAAP EPS of -$3.46 - LCID's stock price fell sharply across multiple trading sessions, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Lucid Group class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) stock between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 - the Class Period - and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Lucid Group securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Lucid Group employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Lucid Group lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Lucid Group class action is a court-appointed investor - typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case - who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Lucid Group investor who purchased LCID stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 28, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Lucid Group stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) stock between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Lucid Group securities class action is July 28, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/LCID for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303282
Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 28, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Lucid securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Lucid class action, go to https://www.rosenlegal.com/cases/lucid-group-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 28, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (2) the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on Lucid's business and financial results; (3) accordingly, the defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid's manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (4) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Lucid class action, go to https://www.rosenlegal.com/cases/lucid-group-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303342
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Key Takeaways Worldpay acquisition expands Global Payments' reach to 6M merchants worldwide.Digital payment trends and recurring revenues continue supporting long-term growth.Rising earnings estimates and strong cash flow reinforce the long-term investment case. Global Payments Inc. (GPN - Free Report) is well-poised to grow on the back of highly recurring, transaction-based revenues, strong free cash flow generation and secular digital payment tailwinds. However, increasing costs and intensifying competition remain concerns.
Global Payments — with a market cap of $19.1 billion — is a global payment solutions provider based in Atlanta, GA. Courtesy of solid prospects, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock is worth holding on to at the moment.
Where Do GPN’s Estimates Stand?The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Global Payments’ 2026 earnings is pegged at $13.86 per share, indicating a 13.4% year-over-year increase. The estimate has witnessed 12 upward revisions and one downward movement over the past 60 days. Furthermore, the consensus mark for revenues is pegged at $12.44 billion for 2026, indicating a 33.6% year-over-year jump.
It beat earnings estimates thrice in the past four quarters and met once, with the average surprise being 2.1%.
GPN’s Growth DriversGlobal Payments has entered a new phase with the completion of its Worldpay acquisition, creating one of the world's largest merchant acquirers. The combined company now serves more than six million merchants across 175 countries, processing about 94 billion transactions and $3.7 trillion in annual payment volume. The larger scale strengthens its position in enterprise payments while expanding its e-commerce and omnichannel offerings.
The business also benefits from a highly recurring revenue model. Once merchants integrate Global Payments' software and payment solutions into their operations, switching providers becomes costly and disruptive. That helps the company retain customers, generate steady transaction revenues and produce consistent cash flows.
Long-term industry trends remain another major advantage. Consumers and businesses continue shifting from cash to digital payments, supported by rising ecommerce activity, contactless transactions, embedded payments, software-integrated solutions, digital wallets and cross-border commerce. These trends should continue driving payment volumes over time.
Global Payments ended the first quarter of 2026 with about $5.9 billion in cash and generated $544 million in adjusted free cash flow, equal to nearly 70% of adjusted net income. Management expects free cash flow conversion above 90% for the full year and plans to return more than $2 billion to shareholders in 2026 while maintaining an investment-grade balance sheet.
Price Target for GPNBased on short-term price targets offered by 26 analysts, the Wall Street average price target for Global Payments is at $92.62 per share, suggesting a 32.7% upside from current levels.
Key ConcernsThere are a few factors that can hinder the stock’s growth.
Despite implementing various cost-control measures, the company's operating expenses are on the rise. Adjusted operating margin fell to 39.9% in the first quarter from 42.4% a year ago. Additionally, intensifying competition in the payments industry presents a challenge. Emerging fintech companies with strong growth potential are rapidly gaining market share, increasing the need for innovation and differentiation.
Nevertheless, GPN’s strategic approach — focusing on partnerships, technology investments and maintaining financial flexibility — positions it for long-term success despite these headwinds.
Better-Ranked PlayersSome better-ranked stocks from the broader payments space are Klarna Group plc (KLAR - Free Report) , Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY - Free Report) and Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY - Free Report) , each carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Klarna’s current-year earnings indicates a 105.1% year-over-year improvement. KLAR has witnessed four upward estimate revisions over the past 60 days against no movement in the opposite direction. The consensus estimate for current-year revenues is pegged at $4.44 billion, indicating 26.5% year-over-year growth.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Paymentus’ current-year earnings indicates a 19.7% year-over-year jump. PAY beat earnings estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, with the average surprise being 12%. The consensus estimate for current-year revenues implies 19.9% year-over-year growth.
The consensus estimate for Remitly Global’s current-year earnings indicates a 331.3% year-over-year surge to $1.38 per share. It has witnessed one upward estimate revision and no downward movement over the past 60 days. The consensus estimate for RELY’s current-year revenues is pegged at $1.97 billion, implying 20.4% year-over-year growth.
U.S.-Iran progress is giving the market a lift today, after the two countries agreed to pause hostilities after a weekend of military conflict. The Nasdaq Composite Index (IXIC) is up 305 points, despite sharp pullbacks from several memory stocks including SanDisk (SNDK) and Micron Technology (MU). The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) is up triple digits as well, while the S&P 500 Index (SPX) sits modestly higher.
Continue reading for more on today's market, including:
Comcast stock surges as company splits into 3. Bitcoin mining stock hit with another 'buy' rating. Plus, call traders eye AMAT's record highs; CHTR jumps on SpaceX partnership; and VZ tumbles on joint venture.
Options bulls are targeting Applied Materials Inc (NASDAQ:AMAT) as the stock surges, up 9.9% at $688.71 at last glance -- earlier tapping a record $696.09 -- after price-target hikes from KeyBanc and Cantor Fitzgerald. So far, 32,000 calls have been exchanged, which is double the intraday average call volume and more than double the amount of puts. The July 950 call is the most popular, with new positions opening there.
Charter Communications Inc (NASDAQ:CHTR) was last seen up 12.2% at $150.00, after Bloomberg reported high-level talks with SpaceX (SPCX) to form a partnership focused on launching a consumer mobile phone offering in the U.S. Today's pop has the shares moving further from a June 22, 10-year low of $124.05, though the 60-day moving average appears to be keeping a cap on gains. Year to date, the equity is down 27.2%.
One of the worst stocks on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) today, Verizon Communications Inc (NYSE:VZ) is down 7.6% to trade at $43.00, after news that the company is combining with British telecommunications company BT Group in a 50/50 joint venture. Plummeting to its lowest level since late January, VZ is still holding on to a 5.8% year-to-date lead.
Applied Materials AMAT shares drew investor attention on Monday, rising more than 10% after KeyBanc Capital Markets issued early commentary ahead of the company’s upcoming third-quarter earnings.
The move came as markets reassessed expectations around the semiconductor equipment maker’s near-term performance and longer-term growth outlook tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure demand.
More than a month before Applied Materials reports its third-quarter results, KeyBanc highlighted what it described as elevated expectations across the company’s key business segments.
This includes the semiconductor capital equipment, electronic manufacturing services, and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test operations.
The firm noted that expectations are now higher than ever, increasing short-term risk around results.
According to TheFly, KeyBanc said that for the stock to continue rising, investors would need to see earnings beats on key metrics, guidance above consensus, and management commentary supporting continued positive out-year revisions.
While the firm remained constructive, maintaining an ‘Overweight’ rating, it also raised its price target by $200 to $750, implying roughly 20% upside from the previous closing price on Friday.
KeyBanc also warned that any disappointment—actual or perceived—could trigger downside volatility, referencing patterns seen in the prior quarter.
Investor sentiment toward Applied Materials has also been shaped by its recent 2026 DRAM and Advanced Packaging Master Class event.
During the presentation, the company projected that semiconductor industry revenue could reach $1 trillion this year.
Brokerage commentary following the event reinforced a positive long-term view.
B. Riley described AMAT as well-positioned for a sustained multi-year semiconductor equipment investment cycle and a “larger-than-expected long-term” opportunity, with potential for increased market share.
Wells Fargo also said the event reinforced its constructive outlook on the company’s product portfolio.
Cantor Fitzgerald added that the artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout is accelerating industry growth, stating that expectations could reach roughly $3 trillion by 2029 and potentially exceed $3.5 trillion by 2030.
A key theme emerging from the company’s messaging is demand tied to next-generation computing constraints.
The June 25 Master Class event highlighted new chipmaking systems aimed at accelerating DRAM production and advanced packaging for AI chips, addressing what management described as a “memory wall” constraining AI compute performance.
A wave of analyst price target revisions has also supported sentiment around Applied Materials in recent weeks.
Jefferies raised its target to $770 from $510, B. Riley lifted its target to $790 from $550, Wells Fargo increased its target to $740 from $715, and BofA moved its target to $720 from $540, with all firms maintaining Buy or Overweight ratings.
The upgrades come alongside strong company guidance for fiscal Q3, projecting revenue of approximately $8.95 billion and non-GAAP EPS of $3.36, implying roughly 36% year-over-year earnings growth.
Sector conditions have also provided a supportive backdrop.
Peer Micron’s recent earnings report highlighted surging AI-driven memory demand, reinforcing the broader industry narrative benefiting semiconductor equipment suppliers like Applied Materials.
Taken together, KeyBanc’s caution on elevated expectations, strong AI-driven structural demand, and a steady stream of analyst upgrades have combined to keep Applied Materials firmly in focus as investors position ahead of its upcoming earnings release.
LOS ANGELES, June 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP reminds investors of the upcoming July 27, 2026 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Zoetis Inc. (“Zoetis” or the “Company”) (NYSE: ZTS) securities between January 14, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR ZOETIS INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS UNDER THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.
What Happened?
On August 5, 2025, Zoetis released its second quarter 2025 financial results, reporting weakened demand trends within its Companion Animal portfolio.
On this news, Zoetis’ stock price fell $5.69, or 3.8%, to close at $146.12 per share on August 5, 2025, thereby injuring investors.
Then, on November 4, 2025, Zoetis released its third quarter 2025 financial results, revealing slowed growth across its key Companion Animal franchises and disclosing continued weakness in sales of its canine pain treatment, Librela, and increased competitive pressure in dermatology and parasiticides. The Company also lowered its full year sales outlook.
On this news, Zoetis’ stock price fell $19.89, or 13.8%, to close at $124.46 per share on November 4, 2025.
Then, on May 7, 2026, Zoetis released its first quarter 2026 financial results, reporting slowing overall revenue growth, declining Companion Animal sales performance, and worsening results across its key dermatology and parasiticides franchises, stating that “competition intensified across key pet care categories, including dermatology and parasiticides,” that “pet owners demonstrated increased price sensitivity,” and that “these new entrants have not yet translated into overall market expansion.”
The Company also explained that “price has played a larger role in the decision process,” that “[s]hare loss is being amplified by a derm market with declining patient volume in the clinic,” and that contraction in the parasiticides market was negatively impacting prescription volumes and compliance. In addition, the Company admitted that it was operating in “a more price sensitive and competitive environment” and further reduced its 2026 growth outlook based on continuing competitive and operating pressures.
On this news, Zoetis’ stock price fell $23.91, or 21.5%, to close at $87.31 per share on May 7, 2026, thereby injuring investors further.
What Is The Lawsuit About?
The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) veterinarian prescription growth and adoption of Zoetis’ Librela, a canine pain treatment, were sharply weakening as clinicians became more cautious following FDA safety warnings concerning serious neurological complications in dogs; (2) Zoetis’ Simparica Trio was losing significant market share to a lower priced competing canine parasiticide with broader indicated use in a slowing overall market; and (3) Zoetis’ dermatology products, Apoquel and Cytopoint, were losing substantial market share to a newly launched competing canine treatment; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
If you purchased or otherwise acquired Zoetis securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than July 27, 2026 to request appointment as lead plaintiff in this putative class action lawsuit.
Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:
If you wish to learn more about this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us:
Charles Linehan, Esq.,
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100,
Los Angeles California 90067
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150,
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at www.glancylaw.com.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook.
If you inquire by email, please include your mailing address, telephone number and number of shares purchased.
To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Contact Us:
Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP,
1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Charles Linehan
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 310-201-9150
Toll-Free: 888-773-9224
Visit our website at: www.glancylaw.com.
NEW YORK, June 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Institutional investors holding positions in Zoetis Inc. (NYSE: ZTS) during the period January 14, 2025 through May 6, 2026 may wish to evaluate lead plaintiff opportunities in a pending securities class action. Request an institutional investor loss assessment. You may also contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500.
Zoetis shares declined from 87.31, a loss of nearly $24 per share. The lead plaintiff deadline is July 27, 2026.
Fiduciary Obligations and Recovery Options
Pension funds, endowments, and asset managers with fiduciary duties to beneficiaries should assess whether participation in this action serves portfolio recovery objectives. Under ERISA and common law fiduciary standards, institutional holders face obligations to evaluate potential recoveries when portfolio companies become subjects of securities fraud litigation. Lead plaintiff appointment offers institutional investors direct oversight of litigation strategy, settlement negotiations, and counsel selection.
Zoetis' Companion Animal segment generated approximately 70% of total company revenue, making institutional portfolio exposure to the alleged misconduct substantialFour separate corrective disclosures between August 2025 and May 2026 progressively revealed concealed competitive and safety deteriorationThe Company raised full-year guidance on August 5, 2025, then sharply reduced it less than nine months later on May 7, 2026Institutional holders who acquired shares relying on management's representations of "durable growth" and market leadership face concentrated lossesLead plaintiff appointment carries no additional financial obligation and provides direct influence over case directionThe PSLRA favors institutional investors with the largest financial interest for lead plaintiff selection Portfolio Impact Assessment
The securities action alleges Zoetis and certain officers portrayed flagship products as competitively dominant while concealing that FDA safety warnings were dampening veterinarian prescribing of Librela, that lower-priced competing therapies were capturing significant market share from Simparica Trio, and that dermatology franchise leadership was eroding. The lawsuit contends these concealed trends made the Company's public growth projections and competitive positioning claims materially misleading to investors who relied on them for portfolio allocation decisions.
Contact us for institutional recovery options or call (212) 363-7500.
Case Summary
The complaint details how management repeatedly assured investors that veterinarian satisfaction remained high and that competitive entrants posed minimal risk, even as internal trends allegedly showed the opposite. When the full scope of deterioration was disclosed on May 7, 2026, shares fell 21.5% in a single session.
"Institutional investors play a critical role in securities class actions. Their participation as lead plaintiffs helps ensure that cases involving significant portfolio losses are managed with the rigor and oversight that benefits the entire shareholder class." -- Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTATION -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP provides sophisticated counsel to institutional investors evaluating lead plaintiff opportunities. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars. Ranked among ISS Top 50 for seven consecutive years. The Court has set July 27, 2026 as the deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment.
Frequently Asked Questions About the ZTS Lawsuit
Q: Who is eligible to join the ZTS investor lawsuit? A: Investors who purchased ZTS stock or securities between January 14, 2025 and May 6, 2026 and suffered financial losses may be eligible. Eligibility is based on purchase date and documented losses, not on whether you still hold the shares.
Q: How much did ZTS stock drop? A: Shares fell approximately 21.5% on the final corrective disclosure alone, a decline of $23.91 per share on May 7, 2026.
Q: What is a lead plaintiff and why does it matter? A: A lead plaintiff is the investor appointed by the court to represent the entire class. Lead plaintiffs are typically investors with the largest documented losses. Being appointed does not increase individual recovery but gives direct oversight of how the case is run.
Q: What documents do I need to make a claim? A: Brokerage statements or trade confirmations showing purchase dates, share quantities, prices paid, and any subsequent sale dates and prices.
Q: What does it cost me to participate? A: Nothing. Securities class actions are handled on a pure contingency basis. No upfront fees, no retainer, no out-of-pocket costs.
Q: What if I already sold my ZTS shares, can I still recover losses? A: Yes. Eligibility is based on when you purchased, not whether you still hold them. Investors who bought during the class period and sold at a loss may still participate.
Q: Has Levi & Korsinsky handled similar cases before? A: Yes, including securities class actions involving revenue inflation, earnings guidance fraud, dividend misrepresentation, and executive misconduct across numerous industries.
CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Ed Korsinsky, Esq.
33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10004 [email protected]
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Zoetis Inc. (NYSE: ZTS) between January 14, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 27, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Zoetis securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Zoetis class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/zoetis-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 27, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and touted growing market share, strong veterinarian adoption, and accelerating sales growth across Zoetis' flagship Companion Animal products and/or failed to disclose that: (1) veterinarian prescription growth and adoption of Zoetis' Librela, a canine pain treatment, were sharply weakening as clinicians became more cautious following FDA safety warnings concerning serious neurological complications in dogs; (2) Zoetis' Simparica Trio was losing significant market share to a lower priced competing canine parasiticide with broader indicated use in a slowing overall market; and (3) Zoetis' dermatology products, Apoquel and Cytopoint, were losing substantial market share to a newly launched competing canine treatment. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Zoetis class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/zoetis-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303340
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Key Takeaways Toyota's global vehicle sales fell 7.2% in May, marking a fourth straight month of year-over-year decline.TM's China sales dropped 31.7%, while Middle East sales fell 38.6%, weighing on global results.Toyota forecasts lower fiscal 2027 retail sales and operating income despite higher expected revenues. Toyota Motor Corporation’s (TM - Free Report) global vehicle sales declined for the fourth straight month in May, as weak demand in China and the Middle East dragged down overall performance.
Worldwide sales fell 7.2% year over year to 834,279 vehicles. International sales decreased 9.6%, while domestic sales in Japan increased 11.1%, supported by strong demand for models including the RAV4 and bZ4X.
Regionally, sales in China tumbled 31.7% due to challenging market conditions, partly due to higher gasoline prices, while sales in the Middle East dropped 38.6%. In the United States, Toyota's largest market, sales were nearly flat, slipping just 0.6%.
Global vehicle production fell 5.5% year over year, as lower output in the United States and Asia, down 3.8% and 13.3%, respectively, outweighed higher production in Japan. The figures include the sales and production of Toyota's luxury brand, Lexus.
Per the automaker, overall demand remained stable, but year-over-year production declined because some manufacturing facilities operated for fewer days during the month.
For fiscal 2027, Toyota projects total retail vehicle sales of 11.18 million units, indicating a decline from 11.28 million units sold in fiscal 2026. Fiscal 2027 sales are expected to total ¥51 trillion compared with ¥50.68 trillion recorded in fiscal 2026. Operating income is projected to be ¥3 trillion, indicating a contraction of 20.3% year over year.
Pretax profit is estimated to be ¥4.23 trillion, implying a decline from ¥5.12 trillion generated in fiscal 2026. R&D expenses are envisioned to be ¥1.6 trillion compared with ¥1.52 trillion spent in fiscal 2026. Capex is forecasted to be ¥2.3 trillion compared with ¥2.39 trillion spent in fiscal 2026.
TM’s Zacks Rank & Key PicksToyota currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Some better-ranked stocks in the auto space are Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (GELHY - Free Report) , Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (PLOW - Free Report) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX - Free Report) , each sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) at present. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GELHY’s 2026 sales and earnings implies year-over-year growth of 77.1% and 40.3%, respectively. The EPS estimate for 2026 and 2027 has improved 18 cents and 7 cents, respectively, over the past 30 days.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PLOW’s 2026 sales and earnings implies year-over-year growth of 16.7% and 31.4%, respectively. The EPS estimate for 2026 and 2027 has improved 39 cents and 29 cents, respectively, over the past 60 days.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GTX’s 2026 sales and earnings implies year-over-year growth of 5.6% and 20.4%, respectively. The EPS estimate for 2026 has improved 12 cents over the past 60 days, while the EPS estimate for 2027 has improved a penny over the past 30 days.
Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.
McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.
His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.
A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.
TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.
McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.
Many electric vehicle (EV) stocks skyrocketed in 2021, when interest rates were low, and consumers ramped up vehicle purchases after the pandemic. But many of those stocks fizzled as inflation drove up their expenses and interest rates spiked in 2022 and 2023.
The market's interest in EV stocks remains tepid, since many growth-oriented investors are chasing hotter AI stocks. Yet the EV market is still expanding -- so it could be a great time to buy Rivian (RIVN +6.75%), BYD (BYDDY 0.53%), and Joby Aviation (JOBY 3.00%)
Image source: Rivian.
Rivian Automotive When Rivian went public in 2021, it initially sold three vehicles: the R1T pickup, R1S SUV, and custom electric delivery vans (EDVs) for Amazon. It subsequently produced custom EDVs for other companies and launched its cheaper R2 SUV earlier this year.
Today's Change
(
6.75
%) $
1.05
Current Price
$
16.68
Rivian has struggled to ramp up its production. After more than doubling its production to 57,232 vehicles in 2023, that figure dropped to 49,476 in 2024 and 42,284 in 2025. It attributed that slowdown to its supply chain constraints, reduced EV subsidies, and intense competition. Its high starting prices ($77,500 for the R1T and R1S) further limited its mainstream appeal.
However, it expects the R2, which starts at $57,990, to expand its addressable market and boost its annual deliveries to 62,000-67,000 vehicles this year. It plans to launch an even cheaper version of the R2, starting at around $45,000, in late 2027. Selling a higher mix of R2 SUVs will also boost Rivian's gross margins, since it's cheaper to manufacture than the R1.
From 2025 to 2028, analysts expect Rivian's revenue to more than triple, with its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) turning positive in the final year. With an enterprise value of $22.6 billion, it trades at just three times this year's sales -- and it could command a higher valuation if it proves its business model is sustainable.
BYD BYD, China's largest automaker, surpassed Tesla as the world's largest EV maker by annual vehicle sales in 2025. It sold 4.6 million vehicles in 2025, compared to its 1.9 million vehicles in 2022 -- the year it entirely phased out its gas-powered vehicles.
Today's Change
(
-0.53
%) $
-0.05
Current Price
$
9.32
Today, BYD sells plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs) and battery-powered EVs (BEVs). It differentiates itself from its competitors by producing its own lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which are safer, cheaper, and more power-efficient than conventional lithium-ion batteries. It also created a vertically integrated supply chain by producing its own motors, chips, and power electronics.
BYD is expanding into Asia, Europe, and Latin America to reduce its dependence on China. In China, it's upgrading its own fast-charging network, increasing its production capacity, and integrating new AI features into its mid-range vehicles. It's also unified its production lines with its e-Platform 3.0 architecture across multiple vehicles.
From 2025 to 2028, analysts expect BYD's revenue and EPS to grow at CAGRs of 13% and 23%, respectively. At 14 times this year's earnings, it's a bargain relative to its growth potential.
Joby Aviation Joby produces electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft. Its S4 eVTOL carries a single pilot and four passengers, travels up to 150 miles on a single charge, and reaches a maximum speed of 200 miles per hour. The S4 can fly faster and farther than many other eVTOLs because it uses lighter tilt-rotor propellers that alternate between lifting and cruising modes, instead of the separate lifting and cruising propellers used by its competitors.
Today's Change
(
-3.00
%) $
-0.27
Current Price
$
8.56
Big investors and customers, including Toyota, Delta Air Lines, and Uber, already back Joby. Toyota will help Joby manufacture its commercial eVTOLs, Delta will use the S4 for its airport-to-home air taxi services, and Uber will integrate its flights into its new Uber Air platform. It has already completed test flights in the UAE, South Korea, and Japan, and plans to launch its first commercial flights in the U.S. in the near future.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hasn't fully certified Joby's commercial flights yet, but that certification could significantly boost its sales over the next decade. Analysts expect its revenue to rise nearly ninefold from 2025 to 2028.
With an enterprise value of $8.7 billion, it might seem pricey at 78 times this year's sales. But it has plenty of upside potential: according to Eve Air Mobility's Global Market Outlook, there could be 30,000 eVTOLs carrying three billion passengers by 2045.
Rivian Automotive shares are climbing with conviction. Why are RIVN shares rallying? The latest push higher follows upbeat EV commentary from British motoring journalist James May, who said he’d pick Rivian’s R1T over Tesla’s Cybertruck, calling out the R1T’s interior styling, overall design "mood," and its "gear tunnel" storage feature. He also noted the R1T would hold "roughly half as much" luggage as the Cybertruck, and that the reviewed vehicle was supplied by Rivian rather than purchased.
Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe also recently argued Americans aren’t “anti-EV” but simply lack options, noting Tesla’s Model 3 and Y comprise roughly 50% of U.S. EV sales. To compete, Rivian this month launched deliveries of its highly anticipated R2 SUV; its Performance model starts at $57,990, slightly undercutting a comparable Model Y ($58,880).
Rivian will expand the R2 lineup with Premium ($53,990) and standard ($48,490) versions in 2026 and 2027. The company projects 62,000 to 67,000 total deliveries for 2026, aiming for an annual production capacity of 300,000 units by 2028.
RIVN: Key Technical Levels To WatchRivian is trading above its key moving averages, which keeps the longer-term repair intact: it’s about 3.3% above the 20-day SMA ($16.19) and roughly 6%–8% above the 50-, 100-, and 200-day SMAs ($15.56, $15.48, and $15.73). That said, the "death cross" from May (50-day SMA below the 200-day SMA) is still a longer-term headwind until the 50-day can reclaim the 200-day and hold.
For momentum, MACD is the cleaner read right now: it’s below its signal line with a negative histogram, which suggests upside pressure is cooling versus the prior upswing unless buyers can re-accelerate. RSI is no longer in the "stretched" zone after June’s overbought signal, which fits the idea that the stock may need consolidation even after sharp up-days.
Key Resistance: $18.00 — a round-number area where rebounds can stall before the stock revisits higher pivot zones Key Support: $14.50 — a nearby pivot level that sits below the current price and can act as an immediate line in the sand What Is Rivian Automotive and Its Business Model?Rivian is a battery electric vehicle automaker that sells its vehicles in the US and Canada, with a lineup that includes a luxury truck, a full-size SUV, and a delivery van. Total deliveries were over 42,000 in 2025, and the company plans to begin selling a midsize SUV in 2026.
Beyond vehicles, Rivian develops electronic control units and related software for autos in a joint venture with Volkswagen, and it’s also building autonomous driving software intended for its vehicles and for robotaxis on the Uber ride-hailing network. That mix matters for days like Monday, because positive product talk (like the R1T vs. Cybertruck comparison) can quickly feed into sentiment around brand strength and future demand.
RIVN Stock Price Movement TodayRIVN Stock Price Activity: Rivian Automotive shares were up 6.53% at $16.65 at the time of publication on Monday, according to Benzinga Pro data.
Image: Shutterstock
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Electric vehicle stocks are surging in midday trading on Monday as a broad tech rebound lifts high-beta names across the market. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA | TSLA Price Prediction) stock is up 8% to $409.29, leading the group with a company-specific catalyst layered on top of the sector bounce.
Rivian (NASDAQ:RIVN) stock is climbing 7% to $16.67, while Lucid (NASDAQ:LCID) stock is gaining 7% to $6.32. Both moves look like sympathy trades tied to the broader risk-on tape.
The rally caps a rough stretch for the group. Tesla stock came into the session off a rough stretch, and the NASDAQ 100 is up 2.33% on the session.
FSD V14 Lite Rollout Anchors Tesla’s Move Tesla began rolling out FSD (Full Self-Driving) V14 Lite to early-access Hardware 3 owners, extending a long-awaited self-driving software upgrade to millions of older vehicles. Tesla AI chief Ashok Elluswamy stated the build “distills the driving behavior from AI4’s v14 series” into the older hardware, with “significantly improved safety” as the headline upgrade.
The nuance matters. The feature remains supervised, meaning drivers must stay attentive, and Tesla has said Hardware 3 cannot support unsupervised FSD. The rollout also follows a U.S. regulatory probe into a fatal Tesla incident, so the catalyst is meaningful but not unambiguously bullish.
Analysts are also positioning ahead of Tesla’s upcoming Q2 2026 delivery figures. Polymarket’s crowd-sourced distribution places a 35% probability on deliveries landing in the 400,000 to 425,000 range, with a 29% probability of 475,000 or more.
Retail sentiment remains divided. Reddit sentiment scores were bearish heading into Monday morning, suggesting today’s bounce in Tesla stock is being driven by institutional and technical flows rather than retail enthusiasm.
Rivian and Lucid Ride the Sector Tape Rivian stock and Lucid stock are moving in sympathy with the broader EV rally rather than on individual catalysts. Both names have been under pressure for months, and today’s pop reads as a bounce within a tough year.
Rivian stock entered Monday down 21% year to date (YTD), with a composite prediction sentiment score of 36.29 (bearish). The longer-term overhang reflects soft EV demand and heavy spending tied to the R2 launch.
Lucid stock had been hit harder, sitting 44% lower year to date through Friday’s close. The Gravity SUV ramp and the Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER)-Nuro robotaxi partnership remain key story stocks, but cash burn keeps a lid on conviction.
Tech Rebound Powers the Risk-On Trade The bounce in Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid is unfolding alongside a broader megacap-tech recovery after last week’s selloff. The NASDAQ 100 was under pressure heading into the session before today’s rebound, and high-beta autonomy and AI names are leading the way back.
Polymarket’s near-term Tesla price ladder reflects a constructive tilt, with an 88% probability the stock closes the week above $412.50 and a 47% probability of closing above $410 by month-end.
Tesla still carries an elevated P/E ratio of 345x, and analysts are split with 23 Buy, 17 Hold, and 7 Sell ratings.
What to Watch Into the Close Investors can watch whether Tesla stock holds above the $405 level into the close and whether the FSD V14 Lite reception broadens beyond the initial early-access cohort. Tesla’s Q2 2026 delivery figures are the next concrete catalyst, and analyst delivery previews could swing intraday sentiment.
For Rivian and Lucid, today is a sympathy rally on a high-beta tape. These remain volatile names, and a single session doesn’t reset the longer-term picture. Investors should consider keeping their position sizes modest given the wide range of outcomes still on the table.
The market's getting walloped right now. As veteran investors can attest, however, this is only short-term noise. In the long run, you won't even remember this pullback.
With that as the backdrop, rather than lamenting the current weakness, use it to your advantage by scooping up some long-term positions at a discount. Here are three such top prospects to consider.
Shopify Like so many other technology companies wading into artificial intelligence waters, the market has punished Shopify (SHOP 1.22%) shares for spending so much on AI, as well as dishing out disappointing revenue guidance. All told, this e-commerce platform's stock is now down nearly 40% from its late-October peak.
Today's Change
(
-1.22
%) $
-1.42
Current Price
$
115.44
The sellers, however, may have overshot their target... and then some. While it's true that Shopify is spending more and earning less than the market has been anticipating, projected Q2 revenue growth in the "high-twenties" is still solid even if non-descript. Analysts also still expect full-year sales growth of 28%, improving last year's per-share profits of $1.43 to $1.84 this year, en route to $2.33 next year on 2027's top-line growth of nearly 24%. Again, not bad. The analyst community further suggests that SHOP shares are currently undervalued, priced more than 30% below their consensus target of $149.83.
Shopify helps merchants and brands establish their own online stores, allowing them to bypass online shopping platforms like Amazon and eBay. Although these massive online malls still play an important role in the e-commerce market, custom-built stores allow brands and sellers to foster a deeper, more intimate relationship with consumers. This is increasingly what people crave, which Amazon simply wasn't built to deliver. This paradigm shift isn't apt to end anytime soon, either.
Robinhood Markets Online brokers are nothing new or novel anymore. In fact, there are enough of them that they could be almost be considered a commodity... all more or less the same.
There's one relatively new name to the business, however, that's managed to distinguish itself from the crowd. That's Robinhood Markets (HOOD +3.14%).
Although launched in 2013, the app that specifically caters to younger investors (average age 26.5) and digitally native investors has turned its customer base into a highly engaged community with 27.7 million members and $377 billion in assets. Both numbers are still growing, too. Its customer headcount grew 6% year over year in Q1, while net deposits of $17.7 billion were up 22% from Q4's number. This, of course, translated into more average revenue per user, or ARPU, which increased 8% year over year to $157.
And that was before Robinhood was selected to participate in SpaceX's public offering in early June, which undoubtedly drew a slew of new customers to the app, where they'll enjoy a casual yet entertaining stock-trading experience. They'll also find credit cards, crypto, prediction markets, managed accounts, and access to a handful of private ventures that aren't readily accessible to other investors.
Image source: Getty Images.
It's a relatively unusual offering compared to online trading 20 years ago, when the industry was still dominated by traditional banks and brokers that had only recently moved into web-based self-service. What Robinhood offers is the industry's new norm, though, and the company executes very, very well. That's not likely to change anytime in the foreseeable future.
The only arguable knock on the company and its stock? The ever-changing market environment means interest in trading ebbs and flows, working for and against its fiscal results. The stock will ebb and flow accordingly.
If you're holding it for at least a decade, though, this volatility won't really matter much.
Qualcomm Finally, add Qualcomm (QCOM +1.03%) to your list of stocks to buy now and hold for a decade.
This is one of those companies that's seemingly been around forever, yet has never really been at the epicenter of any major, long-lived revolution in the technology sector. You probably know it best as an early mobile phone maker, but it doesn't even make handsets anymore. It was displaced by the proliferation of smartphones following 2007's debut of Apple's iPhone. These days, Qualcomm licenses only its mobile phone technology and its name.
The world, however, may finally be ready to embrace the technology that this company's been perfecting for many, many years now. That's a high-performance, low-power mobile processor called the Snapdragon found in a growing number of mobile phones, and even laptop computers.
Today's Change
(
1.03
%) $
1.96
Current Price
$
191.35
This is a bigger deal than it may seem to be on the surface, too. So far, most of the work the world needs AI to handle is actually handled remotely in a data center and then delivered to a user's device. Snapdragon -- and processors using the same architecture -- don't need a constant cloud connection, though. They can do artificial intelligence work directly from the device itself. That's why this tech is now increasingly being tested in wearables, industrial robotics, medical devices, smart meters, and even automobiles with onboard driver assistance.
This is still a relatively new use of this processor know-how, to be clear, since mobile AI-capable processors have only recently been able to function as initially envisioned. But that's what makes Qualcomm such a compelling 10-year prospect. It's arguably one of the companies best positioned to capitalize on the growth of this so-called "edge" AI computing market, which Precedence Research expects to swell from last year's $25.6 billion to $165 billion in 2035.
It matters because, as Qualcomm's CEO Cristiano Amon put it earlier this year, "the winner of the edge is going to be the winner of the AI race."
Investors looking for stocks in the Steel - Producers sector might want to consider either Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais SA (USNZY - Free Report) or Steel Dynamics (STLD - Free Report) . But which of these two companies is the best option for those looking for undervalued stocks? Let's take a closer look.
Everyone has their own methods for finding great value opportunities, but our model includes pairing an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system with a strong Zacks Rank. The proven Zacks Rank emphasizes companies with positive estimate revision trends, and our Style Scores highlight stocks with specific traits.
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais SA and Steel Dynamics are both sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy) right now. The Zacks Rank favors stocks that have recently seen positive revisions to their earnings estimates, so investors should rest assured that both of these companies have improving earnings outlooks. But this is just one piece of the puzzle for value investors.
Value investors also tend to look at a number of traditional, tried-and-true figures to help them find stocks that they believe are undervalued at their current share price levels.
Our Value category highlights undervalued companies by looking at a variety of key metrics, including the popular P/E ratio, as well as the P/S ratio, earnings yield, cash flow per share, and a variety of other fundamentals that have been used by value investors for years.
USNZY currently has a forward P/E ratio of 5.93, while STLD has a forward P/E of 14.63. We also note that USNZY has a PEG ratio of 0.14. This popular figure is similar to the widely-used P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also considers a company's expected EPS growth rate. STLD currently has a PEG ratio of 0.48.
Another notable valuation metric for USNZY is its P/B ratio of 0.2. The P/B is a method of comparing a stock's market value to its book value, which is defined as total assets minus total liabilities. By comparison, STLD has a P/B of 3.94.
These are just a few of the metrics contributing to USNZY's Value grade of A and STLD's Value grade of C.
Both USNZY and STLD are impressive stocks with solid earnings outlooks, but based on these valuation figures, we feel that USNZY is the superior value option right now.
Every trader and investor should keep one principle close: wait for the opportunistic entry. Opportunistic entries are those unforeseeable, often irrational, price pullbacks that occur in otherwise healthy, growing, and attractive stocks. The story in July is that, between-cycle market angst, AI fears, and growth concerns, entry points have opened up in many high-quality stocks.
The likely outcome is that the headwinds that have been impairing price action as of early summer 2026 will begin to fade by early fall, at which point price recoveries will begin, if not before.
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$3.80▼
$24.23Price Target$21.67
Amprius Technologies' NYSE: AMPX June price pullback was driven in large part by short sellers, who sold based on valid concerns about production capacity, order volume, and the company’s scalability. However, early-year results and orders suggest acceleration will continue in the upcoming quarters and may gain momentum as production ramps up.
This year’s catalysts include the U.S. government’s push to build up its drone capabilities and the Matternet deal, which marks a major commercial milestone and promises additional catalysts in the coming quarters. One such catalyst would be progress in battery cell design for Matternet’s drone delivery fleet, an eventual design win that would result in subsequent product orders.
The company's upcoming Q2 results are another catalyst, expected to affirm the momentum seen in the previous quarter. Analysts forecast revenue to grow by more than 100% and the path to profitability to clear.
The 10 analysts tracked by MarketBeat rate the stock a Buy, with 90% Buy-side bias, and expect it to rise 65% from the late-June support target.
Oracle: Deeply Oversold With Backlog Conversion Closing InOracle Today
$148.35 -0.18 (-0.12%)
As of 02:46 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$134.57▼
$345.72Dividend Yield1.35%
P/E Ratio25.43
Price Target$268.27
Oracle’s NYSE: ORCL share price continues to be punished for its massive spending plans, growing debt, and dilution. However, the market is mispricing the stock, treating it as an emerging startup rather than a blue-chip tech company with a backlog of going on a trillion dollars. The takeaway is that this year’s price weakness is a historical opportunity to buy an AI-critical name at pennies on the dollar.
Trading near $150, Oracle’s forward price-to-earnings multiple (P/E) falls into the low-single digits within 10 years, suggesting several hundred basis points of stock price upside will be realized as backlog converts to revenue, cash flow, and earnings. MarketBeat tracks 38 analysts rating ORCL as a consensus Moderate Buy with 79% Buy-side bias and 80% upside from early 2026’s lows.
Snowflake: Melt-Up Can Gain MomentumSnowflake Today
$252.13 +3.17 (+1.27%)
As of 02:46 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$118.30▼
$284.99Price Target$293.53
Snowflake’s NYSE: SNOW stock price melt-up began earlier this year when its results affirmed the AI-driven SaaS-pocalypse wasn’t happening. What is happening is that AI is underpinning demand for business, business is accelerating, and profitability is improving. Analysts responded well to Snowflake's earnings news, raising the stock price outlook and setting the market up to advance.
The technical outlook is solid, with the market up sharply in Q2 and consolidating near highs. Convergence in the MACD suggests the market is getting strong and that fresh highs are coming. Analysts' trends suggest only modest upside at the consensus, but even the consensus would be sufficient for a fresh high. The fresh high is significant as it would open the door to a more substantial technical move, more than 100% at the high-end range.
Salesforce: Left for Dead, Generates Cash Flow, Buys Back SharesSalesforce Today
$158.62 +0.25 (+0.16%)
As of 02:46 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$146.32▼
$276.80Dividend Yield1.11%
P/E Ratio18.35
Price Target$255.14
Salesforce’s NYSE: CRM stock price hit fresh lows in June despite the deep value presented and the strength of the company's Q1 results. The sticking point was the guidance, which was viewed as mixed relative to the high bar analysts set.
Salesforce is not only growing but has accelerated back to a double-digit growth pace and is expected to continue that pace in upcoming quarters.
More importantly, Salesforce generates substantial cash flow and uses it to buy back shares. Buybacks reduced the count by an average of 1.9% for Q1 over the trailing 12-month period.
Forty-three analysts rate CRM as a consensus Moderate Buy with 63% Buy-side bias. CRM stock trades at a potential floor, the analysts' lowest recorded target, with 65% upside forecasted by the consensus.
Zscaler: Cautious Guidance Sets Stage for Rapid Price RecoveryZscaler Today
$138.06 +5.80 (+4.39%)
As of 02:46 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$114.63▼
$336.99Price Target$213.97
Zscaler’s NASDAQ: ZS stock price is down while its peers are in rally mode due to a shift in sales teams. The company’s key sales managers left, creating a temporary gap that prompted management to issue cautious guidance.
It will take time for the gap to be filled, but it will be, and sales will continue at a strong pace because Zscaler provides utility for its clients. The cloud-native platform secures remote access, limiting use to authorized personnel. It also inspects web traffic and protects data.
The bulk of analysts' revisions spurred by the firm's earnings news were reaffirmed ratings and price targets. Analysts assign ZS a consensus Moderate Buy rating. There is an 82% Buy-side bias within the data, and a forecast for a 55% upside from the 2026 lows.
Should You Invest $1,000 in Amprius Technologies Right Now?Before you consider Amprius Technologies, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Amprius Technologies wasn't on the list.
While Amprius Technologies currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI boom is creating opportunities across semiconductors, cloud computing, enterprise software, infrastructure, cybersecurity, and automation.
Inside this report, you’ll find 10 companies positioned to benefit as artificial intelligence moves from hype to real-world deployment and becomes a core growth driver for corporate America.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of ZS, CRM, MSFT either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Key Takeaways VEEV acquired Copli and launched Falcon MLR to automate life sciences content reviews.Falcon MLR integrates with PromoMats to check content against labels and country rules.VEEV says Falcon MLR could eliminate over 70% of manual MLR labor in five years. Veeva Systems (VEEV - Free Report) has strengthened its artificial intelligence (AI)-driven commercial content capabilities with the acquisition of Copli, a pioneer in agentic medical, legal and regulatory (MLR) solutions for the life sciences industry. Alongside the acquisition, the company launched Veeva Falcon MLR, an AI-powered solution designed to accelerate content review and approval processes.
From an investor's standpoint, the acquisition expands Veeva's AI portfolio and enhances the value proposition of its commercial cloud offerings. By embedding agentic automation into the MLR workflow, the company is likely to drive stronger customer adoption, deepen platform stickiness and create additional cross-selling opportunities, which could support long-term revenue growth and strengthen its competitive position in the life sciences software market.
Likely Trend of VEEV Stock Following the NewsShares of VEEV have traded flat since the announcement on June 23. In the year-to-date period, shares of the company lost 23.3% compared with the industry’s 10.9% decline. The S&P 500 increased 7.1% in the same time frame.
The launch of Veeva Falcon MLR is expected to strengthen Veeva's long-term growth prospects by expanding its AI-driven product portfolio and increasing the strategic value of its Commercial Cloud platform. As pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies seek to accelerate content approvals while maintaining regulatory compliance, Falcon MLR can help streamline one of the industry's most time-consuming workflows through agentic automation.
Its seamless integration with Veeva PromoMats is likely to drive broader customer adoption, improve client retention and create cross-selling opportunities across Veeva's installed base, reinforcing recurring subscription revenues and the company's leadership in life sciences software.
VEEV currently has a market capitalization of $27.84 billion.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
More on the NewsVeeva Falcon MLR is an agentic MLR solution that automates the review of promotional and medical content for life sciences companies. Built on Copli's technology and integrated with Veeva PromoMats, the solution conducts compliance checks against approved product labels and country-specific regulations, enabling marketing teams, MLR reviewers and agencies to streamline the review and approval process. According to Veeva, Falcon MLR has the potential to eliminate more than 70% of manual MLR labor over the next five years, significantly shortening review cycles while improving operational efficiency.
The launch is expected to primarily strengthen Veeva's Commercial Cloud business, particularly its Content Management portfolio led by PromoMats. PromoMats is widely used by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to manage the creation, review, approval and distribution of compliant promotional content. By embedding agentic AI directly into this workflow, Veeva enhances the functionality of an already mission-critical application, increasing customer value while making its commercial content ecosystem more intelligent and difficult to replace. The addition of Falcon MLR also complements Veeva's broader Falcon AI portfolio, reinforcing the company's strategy of integrating AI capabilities across its cloud applications.
The acquisition of Copli further expands Veeva's AI expertise and accelerates the commercialization of agentic automation across the life sciences industry. As demand for AI-powered compliance and content management solutions continues to rise, Falcon MLR positions Veeva to capture incremental growth opportunities while strengthening its competitive moat in life sciences software.
Favorable Industry Prospect for VEEVPer a report by Grand View Research, the global agentic AI in healthcare market size was estimated at $538.51 million in 2024 and is projected to reach $4.96 billion by 2030, expanding at a CAGR of 45.56%.
The rising automation of repetitive tasks, growing focus on cost and resource optimization, and increasing adoption of enhanced patient care solutions are factors contributing to market growth.
A Recent Development by VEEVRecently, VEEV announced the launch of Veeva EHS, a new environmental, health and safety application within its Veeva Quality Cloud. The solution is designed to help manufacturing and testing sites proactively identify, manage and mitigate operational and environmental risks while strengthening global compliance readiness.
Management stated that Veeva EHS delivers an advanced and automated approach to environmental, health and safety processes. It enables EHS teams to free up time and ensures quick and accurate execution.
Some better-ranked stocks from the broader medical space are Globus Medical (GMED - Free Report) , West Pharmaceutical (WST - Free Report) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG - Free Report) .
Globus Medical, currently carrying a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), reported a first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.12 per share, which surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 22.1%. Revenues of $759.9 million beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 4.0%. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
GMED has an estimated long-term earnings growth rate of 10.2% compared with the industry’s 12.6% growth. The company’s earnings beat estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 26.3%.
West Pharmaceutical, currently flaunting a Zacks Rank #1, reported first-quarter 2026 EPS of $2.13, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 26.8%. Revenues of $844.9 million surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.5%.
WST has an estimated long-term earnings growth rate of 13.9% compared with the industry’s 9.5% growth. The company’s earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 19.4%.
Intuitive Surgical, carrying a Zacks Rank #2 at present, reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $2.50, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 20.2%. Revenues of $2.77 billion surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.2%.
ISRG has a long-term estimated growth rate of 14.6% compared with the industry’s 12.6% growth. The company’s earnings surpassed estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 16.8%.
Rocket Lab USA Inc (NASDAQ:RKLB) announced that it has agreed to acquire Iridium Communications in a cash-and-stock transaction valued at approximately $8 billion in a deal that would combine a leading launch and spacecraft manufacturer with an established global satellite communications operator.
Under the terms of the agreement, Iridium shareholders will receive $27 in cash and a portion of Rocket Lab stock for each Iridium share, subject to a collar mechanism tied to Rocket Lab’s share price. The total consideration implies a value of about $54 per Iridium share.
Following the announcement, Rocket Lab shares surged almost 12% to about $94, while Iridium stock jumped 22% to about $53.
The companies said the combination would unite Rocket Lab’s launch services and satellite manufacturing capabilities with Iridium’s low Earth orbit communications network, global spectrum rights and subscriber base. The merged group would operate as a vertically integrated space company spanning launch, spacecraft production and satellite-based communications services.
Iridium operates a LEO constellation supporting more than 2.5 million subscribers across government, maritime, aviation and commercial markets. The company generated $871.7 million in revenue and $495 million in OEBITDA in 2025, according to the announcement.
Rocket Lab said the acquisition would expand its business beyond launch and manufacturing into recurring satellite services, while improving cash flow and profitability. The company also said the deal would eliminate third-party launch costs for future constellation deployment and give it direct access to spectrum and end-user applications, including IoT, direct-to-device connectivity and positioning, navigation and timing services.
Iridium CEO Matt Desch said the deal would help accelerate development of next-generation satellite communications and other space-based applications,
Rocket Lab founder and CEO Sir Peter Beck said the combined company would be positioned to expand into new markets beyond its existing launch and spacecraft manufacturing business.
Under its financing plan, Rocket Lab has secured a $3.6 billion bridge loan commitment from Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo and intends to fund the remaining cash portion through a mix of balance sheet resources and additional financing.
The transaction is expected to close in mid-2027, pending regulatory approvals and Iridium shareholder consent.
Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +4.75%), also known as SpaceX, is a remarkable engineering organization carrying the balance sheet of a company that borrowed its way into an artificial intelligence (AI) race it hasn't yet proven it can win. For investors who either missed the IPO window, watched the post-debut sell-off with concern, or simply want exposure to the aerospace and defense sector without signing up for $400 billion in projected net debt by 2031, there are three businesses worth knowing. Each is durable, generating real cash, and doing something in 2026 that makes the long-term case for ownership cleaner than it has been in years.
Rocket Lab (RKLB +15.13%) is the most direct SpaceX analog available to public investors, and the gap between what the two companies are doing today is much narrower than the market has historically priced.
Rocket Lab just signed the largest launch contract in its history. The contract is a multilaunch agreement with an undisclosed customer that includes five dedicated Neutron rocket flights and three Electron flights, all scheduled between now and 2029. That deal pushed the company's total backlog past $2.2 billion, a number that keeps growing as the customer pipeline matures. CEO Peter Beck has been building toward Neutron's debut in Q4 2026, targeting its first commercial flight and then a cadence of three launches in year two and five in year three -- the same disciplined ramp-up Electron followed when it debuted in 2017.
What makes Rocket Lab structurally different from the other pure-play space names is that it doesn't just launch rockets. It manufactures satellite components, builds complete spacecraft, and operates the entire mission lifecycle from design to orbit. That vertical integration means revenue flows even in quarters when no rockets fly, and it means Rocket Lab has real relationships with the defense and intelligence community that translate into contracted work in the future. The Electron rocket alone has accumulated more than 70 missions, making Rocket Lab the second most-launched U.S. orbital rocket behind SpaceX's Falcon 9. The Neutron chapter hasn't even started yet.
Today's Change
(
15.13
%) $
12.79
Current Price
$
97.33
2. RTX RTX (RTX 0.09%) is what SpaceX would look like if it had spent 80 years building the infrastructure of modern aerospace instead of promising to build it.
In Q1 2026, RTX reported a record backlog of $271 billion, $162 billion in commercial aerospace and $109 billion in defense. That backlog represents contracted future revenue already on the books, work that will be delivered regardless of what the stock market does next month. Pratt & Whitney's GTF Advantage engine -- the updated version of the engine that caused significant aircraft-on-ground disruptions in 2023 -- is now in full commercial rollout, and shop visit volumes are compounding as airlines bring their fleets back in for maintenance. Raytheon's munitions business is operating at capacity, with RTX investing $200 million in Columbus, Georgia, and $115 million in Huntsville, Alabama, to expand missile production infrastructure that demand has already outpaced.
Image source: Getty Images.
RTX also secured a 20-year Patriot missile defense contract worth $50 billion through the Defense Logistics Agency in 2025, covering systems and sustainment for U.S. and international customers. A contract with a 20-year term is the opposite of a growth-stage narrative. It's a recurring revenue commitment that will still be generating cash when most of today's AI companies have been through multiple business cycles.
Today's Change
(
-0.09
%) $
-0.16
Current Price
$
187.83
3. Palantir Palantir Technologies (PLTR +3.21%) is the most unconventional of these three picks, but it belongs in this conversation for what it has built within the U.S. defense establishment over the past decade.
In March 2026, the Pentagon designated Palantir's Maven AI system as a formal program of record. This is the military's way of guaranteeing long-term budget allocation for a technology platform. Maven isn't a product Palantir sells to the Pentagon. It is the primary AI operating system the U.S. military uses for target identification, battlefield intelligence fusion, and operational decision-making across multiple theaters. Elevating Maven to a program of record means it now sits within the annual defense budget as a permanent line item, with funding protected from the uncertainty of contract-by-contract renewal.
Today's Change
(
3.21
%) $
3.62
Current Price
$
116.55
On top of Maven, Palantir holds a $10 billion, decade-long enterprise agreement with the U.S. Army that consolidates 75 separate contracts into a single framework. The company is also fighting for access to the Defense Intelligence Agency's data analytics modernization program, asserting in a formal protest that the DIA is building from scratch what Palantir's commercial platform already does. That is the posture of a company deeply embedded in government operations, able to contest procurement decisions from a position of strength.
None of these three companies needs SpaceX to fail. They each have their own reasons to exist and grow. But for investors seeking aerospace exposure with a track record, a backlog, and a balance sheet not assembled through a bridge loan, these three businesses make a cleaner case.
The mid-term elections likely going against President Trump and the GOP is the biggest reason Richard Safran sees behind the U.S. defense stock slump seen in Northrop Grumman (NOC) and RTX Corp. (RTX) among others. In Europe, he believes the continent has underinvested in defense and attributes the rally in companies like Rheinmetall (RNMBY) as a catch-up trade — until those shares also slid in recent months.