QuantumScape (QS 7.10%) wants to revolutionize electric vehicle (EV) batteries with its solid-state battery technology. The company has made good progress toward proving the concept and commercializing its technology.
That may lead investors to question why QuantumScape stock plunged 27.4% in the first half of 2026, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Here's a look at where the business and the stock stand at the midyear point.
Image source: Getty Images.
Major milestones QuantumScape hit some important milestones last year. They included:
An expanded development effort and licensing deal with Volkswagen Group's battery maker, PowerCo. Partnerships with glass maker Corning and Murata Manufacturing to achieve high-volume production of QuantumScape's ceramic separators for commercial use. Integrating its advanced separator process into initial battery cell production. Demonstrating a real-world example with a Ducati motorcycle debut running on its solid-state battery. Signing joint development agreements with two large global automakers. Establishing a technology assessment agreement with a major new global automotive manufacturer. Investors reacted by sending QuantumScape shares soaring in 2025. The stock doubled on all the positive news. The company has continued to make progress toward commercialization in 2026, with an agreement with Honda Motor's research and development arm to enhance the battery platform through joint contributions and expertise from both organizations.
That news could be key for investors, as Honda could expand the use case for solid-state batteries beyond automobiles and motorcycles to include power equipment such as generators and power tools.
Solid-state advantages QuantumScape's batteries are expected to provide greater energy density, faster charging times, and improved safety on a large scale compared to conventional lithium-ion cells. With the company's separator process and an accelerated, continuous manufacturing method that mass-produces the solid-state separators in place, the focus can now be on QuantumScape's potential market opportunities.
Today's Change
(
-7.10
%) $
-0.54
Current Price
$
7.07
As mentioned, those opportunities could go beyond electric cars. Beyond power equipment, QuantumScape is targeting in-rack energy storage for artificial intelligence (AI) factories. EVs are currently QuantumScape's focus, though. And QuantumScape now has agreements and relationships with multiple global automotive companies. But QuantumScape isn't the only company looking to capitalize on those opportunities.
That is another risk factor investors need to consider. An investment in QuantumScape carries somewhat less risk now than a year ago, thanks to its technology milestones. The stock's nearly 30% drop also reduces the risk level.
But there is already some success built into its $4.3 billion market cap. While less risky than at the start of 2026, investors should still allocate only an amount that would be comfortable for a speculative part of their portfolio.
Howard Smith has positions in QuantumScape. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Corning. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In AeroVironment To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in AeroVironment between June 25, 2025 and March 10, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against AeroVironment, Inc. (“AeroVironment” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: AVAV) and reminds investors of the July 27, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (i) AeroVironment understated the likelihood that it would imminently face competition from other vendors for the work it performed in connection with the SCAR program and the U.S. Space Force’s ongoing efforts to modernize the SCN; (ii) accordingly, Defendants overstated AeroVironment’s business and financial prospects; and (iii) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding AeroVironment’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the AeroVironment class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/AVAV or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the AeroVironment Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the AeroVironment securities fraud lawsuit about?
The AeroVironment securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVAV) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that the Company faced imminent competition for its SCAR program contracts and overstating its business and financial prospects. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures — including a U.S. government stop work order on January 20, 2026, a Space Force announcement that it was reopening the SCAR program on March 2, 2026, and AeroVironment's disclosure of a $151.3 million goodwill impairment and contract termination on March 10, 2026 — AVAV's stock price dropped sharply, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired AeroVironment (AVAV) stock between June 25, 2025 and March 10, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the AeroVironment securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former AeroVironment employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?
A lead plaintiff in the AeroVironment class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any AeroVironment investor who purchased AVAV stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 27, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased AeroVironment stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased AeroVironment (AVAV) stock between June 25, 2025 and March 10, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the AeroVironment securities class action is July 27, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/AVAV for more information.
Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased AeroVironment securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Graphic Packaging Holding Company (NYSE: GPK) between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 6, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Graphic Packaging securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Graphic Packaging class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=64523 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 6, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Graphic Packaging was experiencing, inter alia, significant inventory management issues, as well as significantly reduced demand and volumes and increased costs; (2) defendants downplayed the true scope and severity of the foregoing issues, which were likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on Graphic Packaging's business and financial results; (3) defendants likewise overstated the strength and sustainability of Graphic Packaging's business model and operations, as well as its ability to weather ongoing macroeconomic headwinds; (4) accordingly, Graphic Packaging's previously issued full year 2025 financial guidance was unreliable and/or unrealistic; and (5) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Graphic Packaging class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=64523 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303885
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Verra Mobility Corporation (NASDAQ: VRRM) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Verra securities between February 24, 2026 and May 26, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/VRRM.
Verra Case Details
The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
Defendants misrepresented the nature and stability of Verra’s relationship with Avis Budget Group (“Avis”), including the likelihood of securing a contract extension; Defendants downplayed the risk that major rental car companies, including Avis, could replace Verra’s services with in-house solutions or alternative third-party providers; and as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. What's Next for Verra Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/VRRM. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Verra you have until August 4, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Verra Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Verra Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Calix, Inc. (NYSE: CALX) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Calix securities between January 28, 2026 and April 21, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/CALX.
Calix Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants failed to disclose to investors:
the Company's first quarter margins had significantly benefited from advanced purchasing of memory components; that the Company's advanced supply of memory components was dwindling; that, as a result, the Company was experiencing negative margin pressure as it was forced to purchase memory components at rising market prices; and that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's margins, business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.What's Next for Calix Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/CALX, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Calix you have until July 27, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Calix Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Calix Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/299460
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In FS KKR Capital To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in FS KKR Capital between May 8, 2024 and February 25, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against FS KKR Capital Corp. (“FS KKR Capital” or the “Company”) (NYSE: FSK) and reminds investors of the July 3, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) the Company overstated the effectiveness of its portfolio restructuring efforts for its nonaccrual companies; (2) the Company overstated the valuation of its portfolio investments and/or overstated the effectiveness of the Company’s portfolio valuation process; (3) the Company overstated the durability of its quarterly distribution strategy; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding FS KKR Capital’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the FS KKR Capital Corp. class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/FSK or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the FS KKR Capital Corp. Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the FS KKR Capital securities fraud lawsuit about?
The FS KKR Capital securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that FS KKR Capital Corp. (NYSE: FSK) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by overstating the effectiveness of its portfolio restructuring efforts for nonaccrual companies, overstating the valuation of its portfolio investments, and overstating the durability of its quarterly distribution strategy. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures — including an August 6, 2025 report revealing a 6.2% decline in net asset value, a $474 million drop in total fair value of investments, and a loss per share of negative $0.75, followed by a February 25, 2026 announcement of further NAV deterioration, an additional $406 million decline in investment fair value, a dividend cut from $0.70 to $0.48 per share, and an acknowledgment that identified problem companies accounted for only 50% of net realized and unrealized losses — FSK's stock price dropped sharply, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the FS KKR Capital class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) stock between May 8, 2024 and February 25, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the FS KKR Capital securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former FS KKR Capital employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the FS KKR Capital lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the FS KKR Capital class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any FS KKR Capital investor who purchased FSK stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 3, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased FS KKR Capital stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) stock between May 8, 2024 and February 25, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the FS KKR Capital securities class action is July 3, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/FSK for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Helen of Troy Limited (NASDAQ: HELE) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Helen of Troy securities between April 24, 2024 and October 8, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/HELE.
Helen of Troy Case Details
The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
Helen of Troy overstated the success and benefits of its Project Pegasus initiative, touting the "fuel" it was generating while downplaying issues such as "implementation hiccups" at its Tennessee distribution center and assuring investors that the project was progressing and delivering cost-saving efficiencies; in reality, Project Pegasus was not delivering the efficiencies Defendants claimed, as the Company lacked sufficient resources and budget to achieve its stated restructuring and cost-savings goals; and as a result, Defendants' statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.What's Next for Helen of Troy Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/HELE, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Helen of Troy you have until August 3, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Helen of Troy Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Helen of Troy Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/300149
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Listen below or on the go via Apple Podcasts and Spotify
SpaceX exits quiet period and enters Nasdaq 100. (0:17) PepsiCo headlines light earnings calendar. (1:16) ‘Ghost ticketing’ investigation. (2:23)
SpaceX (SPCX) gets two major catalysts this week, and the options market suggests traders are expecting a solid—and possibly spectacular—move.
On Tuesday, the IPO quiet period ends, freeing analysts to publish ratings and price targets. The stock will also join the Nasdaq 100 (QQQ).
The July 10 options chain shows traders positioned for those twin catalysts, with the $180 and $190 calls attracting the strongest bullish interest.
SPCX closed at $162 on Thursday, with weekly options implying a move of about ±9% by Friday's expiration. The $180 and $190 calls represent gains of roughly 11% and 17%, respectively.
Downside positioning is relatively light, with little in the options chain pointing to strong bearish conviction.
Then there's the $330 call. On a stock trading at $162, 106,038 contracts changed hands despite carrying just 36,131 contracts of open interest. At about $0.20 each, they represent retail lottery tickets in their purest form—a wager that SpaceX more than doubles by Friday.
PepsiCo (PEP) headlines the earnings calendar on Thursday, with analysts expecting EPS of $2.21 on revenue of about $24B.
SA analyst Motti Sapir, who rates the stock a Hold, says PepsiCo needs to show "clear growth in North America for both drinks and snacks, real positive free cash flow, and proof it can control costs without losing ground to rivals" for the bulls to return.
But Kody's Dividends, which rates the stock a Buy, argues PepsiCo remains an attractive value and income play and "also looks like it can sustain respectable constant-currency core EPS growth in the years ahead."
Also on the earnings calendarm, Levi Strauss (LEVI) reports on Wednesday, while Delta Air Lines (DAL) reports on Friday.
Looking to the economy, the FOMC will release the minutes from its first meeting under Chairman Kevin Warsh on Wednesday.
Wells Fargo economists say they will be watching for "any signs of what could shift a divided Committee from a hold toward rate hikes."
"We will be looking at whether a majority of participants view the recent pickup in inflation as persistent enough to warrant additional tightening or as primarily a temporary supply shock," they said.
"We will also be interested in the extent to which Committee members view the labor market and the demand side of the economy as an inflationary problem."
In the news this weekend, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into allegations that StubHub (STUB) canceled or failed to deliver World Cup tickets in a practice known as "ghost ticketing."
Soccer fans across the country complained that their tickets were canceled days, or sometimes hours, before matches.
StubHub blamed the issue on "transfer problems" with FIFA's ticketing platform. But Paxton said consumers instead attribute the cancellations to "ghost ticketing," in which sellers collect payment for tickets they don't possess and later cancel the sale.
And starting Monday, Tesla (TSLA) will cap employees' spending on AI products at $200 a week.
The Information reported that the limit will not apply to xAI.
Earlier this year, Elon Musk said output per Tesla employee "is going to get nutty high" thanks to the company's internal use of AI and its Optimus humanoid robot program.
And it's a busy week for dividend investors.
On Monday, AI bellwether Micron (MU), GE Aerospace (GE), JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) all go ex-dividend.
Micron pays on July 21, GE on July 27, JPMorgan on July 31 and Cisco on July 22.
On Tuesday, Dollar General (DG) goes ex-dividend, with a July 21 payout.
The New York Times (NYT) goes ex-dividend on Wednesday and will pay shareholders on July 23.
Accenture (ACN) and Mastercard (MA) both go ex-dividend on Thursday.
Accenture pays on August 14, while Mastercard's payout is August 7.
On Friday, AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Marvell Technology (MRVL), Toll Brothers (TOL), Oracle (ORCL) and Lennar (LEN) all go ex-dividend.
AT&T pays out on August 3. Verizon pays out on August 3, with Marvell on July 30 and Toll Brothers, Lennar and Oracle on July 24.
Meta Platforms (META 4.80%) has been a jarring growth stock over the past year. It's down by 15% year to date, but its fundamentals continue to improve. The stock only trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 20 and has solid growth rates already, so a single catalyst could result in a meaningful rally.
Reality Labs could be the catalyst. It's the AI hardware part of Meta Platforms' business that includes Quest headsets and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses. Here's what investors should know.
Image source: Getty Images.
Meta Glasses can become a major hit Meta Glasses are an innovative technology that let you take pictures, speak with AI tools, make and receive calls, and type on virtual surfaces just by wearing them. You don't have to pull out a smartphone to do any of those things anymore.
Meta Platforms debuted Meta Glasses in June with prices starting at $224. Payment plans are available starting at $19 per month, which lasts for two years at 0% APR. These prices are well within the ballpark of what many people can pay, including the $19 monthly plan. This technology is no longer science fiction, and just as importantly, it's more accessible to the average consumer.
While Meta Platforms released smart glasses a few years ago that had a relatively muted reception, those smart glasses were technologically limited and had no AI capabilities. They just let you take pictures using your glasses instead of taking out your smartphone. They were pretty much cameras with no other features. These current AI glasses are far more advanced, which can help them generate more traction.
The company has a massive head start compared to competitors in this new industry. It controls 85% of the AI glasses industry and already has 3.56 billion daily active users on its family of apps, which is a 4% year-over-year increase. Meta Platforms can promote its AI Glasses to its vast user base to get quick momentum and preserve its comfortable lead over competitors.
Having control over a high-potential industry remains compelling. Grand View Research projects a 24.2% CAGR for the smart glasses market through 2033, but the research company also estimates that the smart glasses market is only worth $3.2 billion. If it gets anywhere close to the smartphone market's $556.4 billion total valuation, this early start will be massive.
The success of Meta's AI Glasses should make it much easier for the company to sell other consumer hardware, similar to how Apple sells iPhones and MacBooks. The AI Glasses segment may be a sleeping giant, and the stock's 20 P/E ratio leaves a lot of room for upside momentum if that proves to be the case.
Today's Change
(
-4.80
%) $
-29.41
Current Price
$
583.50
Meta Platforms is already delivering high growth rates Even though Meta Platforms' stock has been stuck in the mud for more than a year, it continues to gain market share in the online advertising industry. Revenue surged by 33% year over year in Q1, with operating income rising by 30%. Meta Platforms closed out the first quarter with a robust 41% operating profit margin, which makes the current valuation even more baffling.
Meta Platforms' vast amount of capital and high profits make it easier to invest heavily into projects like AI Glasses until they become profitable. AI Glasses can also give Meta Platforms' advertising revenue a boost by creating more ad impressions.
Meta AI Glasses don't have to make up a big portion of total revenue right now. Just an announcement in the upcoming Q2 earnings release that shows meaningful momentum in this segment, combined with results investors have become accustomed to, may be enough to trigger a rally.
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA | TSLA Price Prediction) and BYD (OTC:BYDDF) sit at opposite poles of the electric vehicle world.
Tesla just posted a sharp Q1 margin rebound while pouring cash into robotics and autonomy. BYD, the world’s largest new energy vehicle maker by volume, keeps flooding global markets with affordable EVs and plug-in hybrids. The businesses barely resemble each other anymore, which is exactly why this quarter is worth comparing.
Margin Recovery Lifts Tesla. Volume and Vertical Integration Anchor BYD. Tesla’s Q1 2026 print was a genuine turnaround quarter. Revenue hit $22.387 billion, up 15.78% year over year, and automotive gross margin snapped back to 21.1% from 16.2%. Operating income jumped 135.84% to $941 million. That is a real profitability inflection after a brutal 2025, when full year net income fell 46.79%.
The mix tells the story. Services and other revenue climbed 42% as FSD active subscriptions reached 1.28 million, up 51% year over year. Software is finally showing up in the P&L. Energy revenue slipped 12%, a rare soft spot after a record 2025.
BYD’s business runs on a different engine. It builds Blade Battery cells in-house, sells across the Dynasty, Ocean, Denza, Yangwang, and Fang Cheng Bao brands, and pushes hard into Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Chairman Wang Chuanfu has kept the company obsessively focused on cost per vehicle and battery supply, not autonomy software.
Robotaxi Bet vs. Sub-$15,000 EV Bet Lens Tesla BYD Core bet FSD, Robotaxi, Optimus Affordable EVs and PHEVs at scale Vertical edge Custom AI silicon with SpaceX fab Blade Battery and in-house electronics Key vulnerability Autonomy timelines slipping China tariffs in EU and US Tesla’s $1.95 billion R&D quarter, unsupervised Robotaxi launches in Dallas and Houston, and Optimus lines designed for 1 million robots per year in Fremont point to a software and robotics endgame. Prediction markets are less convinced. Polymarket traders put only a 0.1 probability on an Optimus release by year-end and just 0.22 on a California Robotaxi launch by December 31.
BYD is taking a different path, undercutting legacy automakers on sticker price and betting anti-involution policy support flagged by Morningstar will consolidate share toward Chinese EV conglomerates such as BYD and Geely.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Tesla didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.
Deliveries, Tariffs, and Whether Software Revenue Compounds I will be watching Tesla’s Q2 delivery cadence, the Cybercab pilot ramp at Gigafactory Texas, and whether FSD subscriber growth keeps compounding above 50%.
For BYD, tariff outcomes in Europe and export volumes into ASEAN and Brazil are the swing factors. You should also keep an eye on battery pack capacity, which Tesla flagged as its limiting factor on vehicle production.
Why I Lean Toward BYD on Value, Tesla on Optionality Tesla trades at a forward P/E of 217 with a $421.16 analyst target against a current $393.45. The stock is down 12.51% year to date after a 7.49% single-day drop.
BYD shares sit at $10.20, off 34.3% over one year. If I want optionality on autonomy and robotics, Tesla is the vehicle, and I accept the multiple.
In case I want an operationally excellent, cash-generative automaker at a beaten-down price, BYD looks more interesting to me. If input costs and tariff policy stay volatile, I would rather wait than force either position.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Tesla didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.
I keep buying Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG | GOOG Price Prediction) because every quarter it hands me a new reason to. This is the one AI position where the receipts arrive on schedule, the moat is visible in the numbers, and the price still lets me add without holding my nose. I am compounding into a business that is now printing cash on a scale most companies will never approach.
Google owns the front door to the internet and is turning that traffic into an AI toll road while the rest of the industry is still building on-ramps.
When Sundar Pichai said on the Q1 call, “We are genuinely differentiated. We’re unique in the market because of our vertically optimized AI stack”, I read it as a description of the income statement. Custom TPUs, Gemini models, Cloud, Search, YouTube, Android, Waymo. One company, one stack, one cash engine.
The numbers that keep my finger on the buy button Q1 2026 EPS came in at $5.11 against a $2.63 consensus, a 94.10% beat and the fourth consecutive EPS beat. Revenue hit $109.90 billion, up 21.8% year over year, with operating income at $39.70 billion and a 36.1% operating margin. Full year 2025 revenue crossed $402.84 billion for the first time. Return on equity sits at 38.9%.
Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year over year to $20.03 billion, and backlog nearly doubled quarter on quarter to over $460 billion. Cloud operating margin expanded from 17.8% a year ago to 32.9%.
Gemini is running at 16 billion tokens per minute through the API, up from 10 billion the prior quarter, and GenAI product revenue grew nearly 800% year over year. This is enterprise money landing.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Google didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.
Alphabet raised its quarterly dividend 5% to $0.22 per share, sits on $38.06 billion in cash against $478.75 billion in shareholders’ equity, and trades at a trailing P/E of 27 and a forward P/E of 25. Fifty-eight buy ratings, zero sells.
The stock is up 98.71% over the past year and 13.65% year to date, and I am still adding.
The risk I am not glossing over The real concern is capital intensity. CapEx more than doubled year over year to $35.67 billion in Q1, and management now guides 2026 CapEx to $180 billion to $190 billion, with 2027 expected to increase further. Free cash flow fell 46.63% year over year to $10.12 billion. If AI demand cools before those data centers are paid for, the return on that spend gets ugly.
That $460 billion Cloud backlog is a signed answer to the demand question. CFO Anat Ashkenazi called it “unprecedented internal and external demand for AI compute resources”, and Pichai flatly said the company is “compute constrained”. When customers are lined up and you cannot ship fast enough, spending is a moat.
Search revenue still grew 19% to $60.40 billion, paid subscriptions crossed 350 million, and Waymo is doing over 500,000 fully autonomous rides per week. I own a search company, a cloud company, an AI lab, a video platform, and a robotaxi operator inside one ticker at a market multiple. That is why I cannot stop buying.
Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Google didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.
Despite a growing number of headwinds, the S&P 500 (^GSPC +0.00%) has continued its march higher in 2026. The benchmark index was up 9.6% through the first half of the year, even amid an ongoing war in Iran that sent oil prices spiking. While we expected the Fed to lower interest rates in 2026, it's now more likely we'll see one or two interest rate hikes before the end of the year. Meanwhile, stock valuations have climbed to their highest level in history, outside the dot-com bubble, according to certain measures.
But the biggest warning signal that the bull market may be closer to the end than the start is coming from three companies: Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +2.69%), better known as SpaceX, Alphabet (GOOG 0.37%) (GOOGL 0.23%), Google's parent company, and SK Hynix, one of the leading memory chipmakers.
Here's what investors need to know.
Image source: Getty Images.
Setting new records on Wall Street The above three companies all made history in recent weeks.
Alphabet issued $85 billion worth of stock on June 2, the largest public equity raise in Wall Street history. SpaceX outdid Alphabet with its initial public offering on June 12, which ultimately raised $86 billion after the underwriters exercised their option to buy additional shares, making it the biggest IPO in history. SK Hynix, a Korean company, is set to list American depository receipts on the Nasdaq in a few weeks, raising up to $29 billion. That would be a record amount for an ADR. These companies are seeking substantial capital from investors. And not only are they receiving it, but they're getting even more than they initially asked for. Alphabet initially planned to raise $80 billion, and SpaceX's IPO was meant to raise $75 billion. Combined, the three companies will raise about $200 billion.
$200 billion in cash doesn't just appear out of nowhere. Investors have to sell other assets to put up that money. Most likely, they're selling other securities, which will put pressure on the rest of the stock market. With more giant IPOs coming down the pipeline and more SpaceX shares entering the market post-lockup, there's still a huge amount of money that will shift in the market.
But these equity raises may signal something that could have a much bigger impact on long-term stock returns from here.
Why are these companies using equity to raise capital? It's worth noting that all three companies are well-positioned to raise capital in the bond market rather than the stock market. Alphabet and SK Hynix, in particular, are immensely profitable companies with strong balance sheets that could take on more debt at relatively low interest rates.
To be sure, Alphabet added $31 billion in long-term debt to its balance sheet in the first quarter, but ultimately raised much more using equity. Even the unprofitable SpaceX has had no challenges raising capital via the bond market. It recently issued $25 billion in debt, more than its original plan to raise $20 billion from the market, after receiving $90 billion worth of orders.
The fact that these companies are tapping their equity for cash suggests they see the stock market as willing to pay premium prices for equity right now. That's certainly true, as the equity risk premium (the difference between the earnings yield and the yield on Treasury bonds) has shrunk to nearly nothing. In other words, it may be cheaper for these businesses to give up a portion of future earnings than to take on debt at their current valuations. After all, they can retire shares through buybacks in the future when their cash needs aren't as substantial.
But everyday investors should heed the warning that these companies are sending. Stocks are expensive right now, and it's a seller's market. That doesn't mean a market crash is imminent, but it does mean investors need to carefully consider a business's long-term value creation relative to its current market price and its cost of capital.
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Microsoft securities between May 1, 2025 and January 28, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/MSFT.
Microsoft Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements because they failed to disclose that:
(1) Microsoft’s Copilot family of products had experienced significant brand positioning, user experience, usage, data siloing, computational capacity, organizational, and interoperability problems;
(2) Microsoft’s flagship proprietary AI model ranked well below competitors on a number of benchmark tests;
(3) Microsoft needed to increase by billions of dollars its capital expenditures and divert graphics processing unit (“GPU”) and central processing unit (“CPU”) capacity away from fulfilling demand for its profitable Azure services in order to improve the competitive positioning of its critical Copilot family of products and increase its AI-related research and development (“R&D”); and
(4) as a result of the above, Microsoft had failed to convert a significant percentage of its commercial Microsoft 365 users to paid Copilot subscriptions and Microsoft’s Copilot offerings had lost market share to rival products, a trend that was increasing.
What's Next for Microsoft Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/MSFT. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Microsoft you have until August 11, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Microsoft Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Microsoft Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Artificial intelligence has become the defining investment story of this decade. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), and a handful of other technology giants are on pace to spend well over $1 trillion building the infrastructure needed to power AI, from advanced semiconductors and data centers to power grids and networking equipment.
Wall Street has largely viewed that spending as inevitable. As long as AI adoption keeps accelerating, investors assume the money will continue flowing. But the world’s central banks appear increasingly uncomfortable with exactly how that expansion is being financed.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) — the “central bank for central banks” — used its latest Annual Economic Report to warn about concentrated AI investment, growing leverage, opaque financing arrangements, and expanding links between traditional banks and private credit markets. While the report never explicitly says regulators want to slow artificial intelligence, many of its recommendations would do precisely that by making the capital fueling the AI boom significantly more expensive — and potentially much harder to obtain.
For investors, that’s a risk the market may be dramatically underestimating.
AI Doesn’t Just Run on Chips. It Runs on Credit. The AI revolution is often portrayed as being financed by cash-rich technology companies. That’s only part of the story.
Even companies generating tens of billions of dollars in annual free cash flow are borrowing aggressively because AI infrastructure spending is occurring faster than internally generated cash can support. Corporate bond issuance has surged while banks have become critical financiers of everything from semiconductor fabrication plants and hyperscale data centers to power infrastructure and cloud expansion.
The current AI buildout isn’t simply a technology boom. It’s a credit boom. That distinction matters because credit cycles have a long history of ending far more abruptly than technology cycles.
Banks would lose much of their ability to use proprietary internal models that often classify large corporate loans as relatively safe. Instead, regulators would require standardized risk calculations, stricter operational risk requirements, tougher market-risk rules under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book, expanded recognition of unrealized losses, and higher capital requirements for globally systemic banks.
Every one of those changes points in the same direction. Banks would need to commit considerably more capital to support large, complex technology loans. That doesn’t eliminate financing, but it makes it substantially more difficult and expensive.
The Risk Is Bigger Than Higher Borrowing Costs Many investors assume that higher financing costs simply slow growth. The BIS report suggests something more dangerous.
Today’s AI investment boom depends on a continuous flow of capital. Companies are spending enormous sums today based on expectations that tomorrow’s AI revenues will justify the investment. If financing becomes more restrictive, companies may begin delaying projects, scaling back data center construction, or prioritizing only their highest-return initiatives.
That wouldn’t just affect hyperscalers. Chipmakers, networking companies, equipment suppliers, utilities, construction firms, and countless AI startups all depend on that spending pipeline remaining intact.
Read: Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.
The risk is reflexive. Less financing leads to slower capital spending. Slower spending weakens revenue growth across the AI ecosystem. Lower growth compresses stock valuations, making raising new capital even more difficult. That leads to further spending reductions, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that can accelerate surprisingly quickly.
Markets often assume trends continue indefinitely — until they don’t.
Private Credit Isn’t the Safety Valve Investors Think Many bulls argue private credit can simply replace traditional bank lending if Basel III limits bank financing. The BIS appears to have anticipated that argument.
Its report repeatedly warns that risk migrating from regulated banks into private credit doesn’t reduce systemic risk — it merely hides it. Private credit funds have become major lenders to technology companies precisely because they operate with fewer regulatory constraints. But that freedom comes with vulnerabilities.
The sector has experienced rising defaults, increasing use of payment-in-kind financing that allows troubled borrowers to defer cash interest payments, growing redemption pressure from investors, and significant concentration in technology lending.
The BIS argues that allowing AI financing to migrate wholesale into shadow banking simply creates a different kind of financial instability. Its long-term solution is to extend tougher oversight to private credit as well through leverage limits, enhanced reporting requirements, and stricter collateral standards.
In other words, regulators don’t just want to tighten bank lending. They want to tighten the entire credit ecosystem supporting speculative investment.
Key Takeaway Investors ignore the big picture at their own peril. Artificial intelligence is a transformative technology, but one that still requires capital.
Railroads transformed America despite repeated financial panics. The internet revolution survived the dot-com bust. Revolutionary technologies often outlive the speculative bubbles built around them. That’s why investors should distinguish between AI’s long-term future and today’s financing model.
Current valuations assume years of uninterrupted capital spending and virtually unlimited access to financing. The BIS is signaling that the era of easy money and lightly regulated credit may be coming to an end.
If global regulators successfully restrict both bank lending and private credit while central banks keep interest rates elevated, they won’t necessarily kill artificial intelligence. But they could dismantle the financial engine powering today’s AI spending boom.
And if that engine stalls, investors may discover that the biggest risk to AI stocks wasn’t competition or slowing demand. It was credit all along.
If You’ve Been Thinking About Retirement, Pay Attention (sponsor) Retirement planning doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The key is finding expert guidance, and SmartAsset’s simple quiz makes it easier than ever for you to connect with a vetted financial advisor. Here’s how:
Answer a Few Simple Questions.
Get Matched with Vetted Advisors
Choose Your Fit
Why wait? Start building the retirement you’ve always dreamed of. Get started today! (sponsor)
The financial plumbing of the global economy is undergoing a rewrite. For the better part of a decade, the issuance of stablecoins, digital dollars living on blockchain networks, was largely monopolized by crypto-native firms. Traditional payment processors appeared to be watching from the sidelines, occasionally announcing small-scale pilot programs. That dynamic was shattered this week.
The launch of Open USD by a 140-member consortium marks the aggressive institutional capture of decentralized payment infrastructure. By redistributing reserve interest directly to network partners, traditional financial processors are weaponizing shared-yield tokenomics against early market entrants. Legacy networks are successfully scaling the digital dollar while actively dismantling the proprietary moats of pure-play crypto issuers.
Get Visa alerts:
The GENIUS Act and the Green Light for Legacy CapitalTo understand the magnitude of this shift, look back to the July 2025 passage of the GENIUS Act. This regulatory framework provided the federal compliance structure that traditional finance demanded.
Visa Today
V
Visa
$361.31 -0.82 (-0.23%)
As of 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$293.89▼
$362.13Dividend Yield0.74%
P/E Ratio31.47
Price Target$397.96
Legacy players like Visa Inc. NYSE: V and Mastercard NYSE: MA have never ignored the blockchain space. They were waiting for the legal green light to deploy capital at scale without risking entrenched legacy businesses.
With regulatory clarity secured, the broader fintech ecosystem moved rapidly. Stripe laid the operational groundwork by acquiring the stablecoin platform Bridge for $1.1 billion, placing seasoned operators at the helm of a new standard.
The result is the Open Standard consortium, a massive alliance featuring Visa, Stripe, BlackRock NYSE: BLK, Alphabet NASDAQ: GOOGL, and Coinbase NASDAQ: COIN. This is not a defensive maneuver by traditional finance. It is an aggressive, calculated infrastructure upgrade designed to own the rails of cross-border money movement.
Tokenomics 2.0: Siphoning the Crypto YieldLet us take a moment to unpack the structural evolution introduced by Open USD, as it directly attacks the core business model of first-generation stablecoins. When an institution mints a legacy stablecoin, they hand over fiat currency, and the issuer deposits those funds into short-term U.S. Treasuries. The issuer then keeps the yield generated by those reserves. When interest rates are high, this model prints exceptional cash flow.
Open USD operates on a shared-yield architecture. Instead of hoarding treasury interest at the issuer level, the Open Standard consortium redistributes that yield back to the network partners who facilitate transactions. They also eliminated minting and redemption fees. This creates a zero-friction, yield-generating asset for enterprise partners, instantly rendering proprietary, closed-loop stablecoin models uncompetitive.
A Leaky Moat: Circle's Margin Compression CrisisCircle Internet Group Today
CRCL
Circle Internet Group
$64.56 -0.06 (-0.10%)
As of 07/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$49.90▼
$262.97Price Target$117.38
This architectural shift presents an existential threat to companies heavily reliant on the legacy model. Circle Internet Group NYSE: CRCL generates roughly 99% of revenue from the interest earned on the reserves backing the USDC stablecoin. When the core product is commoditized by a consortium offering better economics to distributors, the resulting margin compression is rapid and severe.
The most glaring signal of this structural vulnerability is the defection of primary ecosystem partners. Coinbase previously served as a massive distribution hub for USDC. In 2024 alone, Coinbase extracted $908 million from Circle in distribution and revenue-sharing agreements.
With the launch of Open USD, Coinbase has joined the Open Standard alliance. The economic incentive is clear. Rather than taking a negotiated cut from a third-party issuer like Circle, exchange networks and payment processors can utilize Open USD to internalize the reserve yields directly. This supply chain defection forces Circle into an impossible corner. To retain enterprise distributors, Circle must either slash fees to zero or give up reserve yield. Both options eviscerate profitability.
$20 Billion Buybacks and Unstoppable MarginsCircle Internet Group Stock Forecast Today12-Month Stock Price Forecast:
$117.38
81.82% Upside
Hold
Based on 24 Analyst Ratings
Current Price$64.56High Forecast$190.00Average Forecast$117.38Low Forecast$55.00Circle Internet Group Stock Forecast Details
The market is already pricing in the collapse of the proprietary stablecoin moat. Shares of Circle Internet Group have faced severe downward pressure, currently trading near $62 after dropping nearly 21% since the start of the year. Circle recently reported quarterly earnings that reflect the strain, with earnings per share (EPS) missing estimates by 6 cents and net margins languishing at negative 2.76%.
Institutional sentiment is rapidly souring on the pure-play crypto issuer. Short interest in Circle rose to 45.4% month over month, now representing 10.06% of the public float.
A short squeeze requires an underlying bullish catalyst, but the structural degradation of the business model provides exactly the opposite. Internal confidence appears equally shaken. Insiders have executed zero open-market purchases over the last six months, instead heavily distributing shares, dumping over $158 million in stock over the past 90 days. Wall Street analysts are aggressively revising valuation models, with Compass Point aggressively slashing its price target on Circle from $97 down to $55.
As capital flees the vulnerable pure-play issuers, it is rotating heavily into the legacy networks, leading the Open USD charge. Visa is one of the primary beneficiaries of this institutional capture. Visa is currently trading near $351 and boasts a market capitalization exceeding $630 billion.
Visa is demonstrating exactly how to leverage an entrenched market position to capture new technology. Integrating Open USD into globally ubiquitous payment rails neutralizes the threat that decentralized finance will disrupt cross-border revenue.
Visa Stock Forecast Today12-Month Stock Price Forecast:
$397.96
10.14% Upside
Buy
Based on 26 Analyst Ratings
Current Price$361.31High Forecast$450.00Average Forecast$397.96Low Forecast$350.00Visa Stock Forecast Details
The fundamentals backing Visa are pristine. Visa recently posted $3.31 EPS, easily beating consensus estimates of $3.10, driven by a 17.1% year-over-year revenue expansion. Profitability metrics remain exceptional, featuring a 51.68% net margin and a massive 65.00% return on equity. A forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 26.84 is entirely reasonable for a network poised to capture the next generation of digital payments.
Analysts are taking note of the expanded moat. Piper Sandler recently upgraded Visa from overweight to a strong buy, citing confidence in its cross-border transaction strategy and resilient consumer discretionary spending.
While Circle faces insider distribution, the Visa board is signaling confidence in the current valuation and future cash flows. Visa recently initiated a $20 billion share repurchase program. This authorization acts as a massive macro tailwind for Visa, providing structural support to the share price while management executes the digital asset expansion. Share buybacks of this magnitude tell you exactly how Visa leadership views its own strategic positioning.
Plugging the Leaks in Your Crypto PortfolioThe era of digital assets existing in a silo outside the traditional financial system is over. The 140-member consortium behind Open USD proves that legacy payment processors possess both the capital and the strategic foresight to absorb disruptive technologies. By weaponizing shared-yield economics, Visa and other legacy giants are capturing the multi-trillion-dollar stablecoin market while systematically dismantling the business models of early crypto-native pioneers.
Investors navigating the shifting payments sector might consider evaluating the durability of revenue streams. Portfolios heavily weighted toward single-product crypto firms reliant on proprietary yield models face significant structural risk. Conversely, adding exposure to entrenched, highly profitable networks executing large volume share repurchases offers a compelling way to capture the upside of the digital dollar's global expansion.
Should You Invest $1,000 in Visa Right Now?Before you consider Visa, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Visa wasn't on the list.
While Visa currently has a Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
Learn the basics of options trading and how to use them to boost returns and manage risk with this free report from MarketBeat. Click the link below to get your free copy.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX | SBUX Price Prediction) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) just delivered two of the most instructive turnaround updates in restaurants.
Starbucks posted its clearest inflection yet under Brian Niccol. Chipotle, still working through a full year of negative comps, leaned harder on unit growth and menu innovation. Same sector, two very different scoreboards.
Coffee Traffic Comes Back. Burrito Traffic Still Hasn’t. Starbucks’ Q2 FY2026 report showed global comparable store sales up 6.2%, with transactions up 3.8% and ticket up 2.3%. North America comps ran 7.1%, driven by real foot traffic rather than pricing. Revenue landed at $9.53 billion, up 8.79% year over year, and non-GAAP EPS of $0.50 beat the $0.44 estimate.
Niccol called it plainly: “Our second quarter marked the turn in our turnaround as our Back to Starbucks plan drove both top and bottom line growth.”
Chipotle’s Q4 2025 print told a rougher story. Comparable restaurant sales fell 2.5% on a 3.2% transaction decline, and restaurant-level operating margin compressed to 23.4% from 24.8%. EPS of $0.25 squeaked past the $0.24 consensus, but 2025 was Chipotle’s first full year of negative comp sales.
CEO Scott Boatwright framed it as resilience, pointing to “the early success of our high-protein menu and benefits from our high-efficiency equipment package.”
Back to Starbucks vs. Recipe for Growth The strategic playbooks diverge more than the branding suggests. Starbucks is defending traffic with a reimagined three-tier Rewards program (Green, Gold, Reserve), a restructured China joint venture where Boyu Capital holds 60%, and plans for 600 to 650 net new coffeehouses in FY26.
Chipotle is buying growth with concrete: 334 openings in 2025 and 350 to 370 planned for 2026, roughly 80% with a Chipotlane.
SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion. Open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $1,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts. See for yourself by clicking here now.
Lens Starbucks Chipotle Comp trend +6.2% global -2.5% Traffic +3.8% transactions -3.2% transactions Growth engine Rewards, China JV, ticket mix New units, high-protein menu, AI Capital return $0.62 quarterly dividend $2.43B buybacks in 2025 FY26 comp guide ≥5% Approximately flat Valuations reflect the mood. Starbucks trades at a P/E of 79, priced like the turnaround is confirmed. Chipotle sits at 32, with a forward multiple of 30, cheaper but attached to shrinking traffic. Consumer spending on Food Services keeps rising, hitting $1,538.3 billion in May 2026, so this is not a macro problem. It is a share problem.
The Next Test Is Whether Chipotle Can Fix Traffic Watch three things. First, whether Starbucks holds North America transaction momentum against a 170 bps margin contraction from labor investments, tariffs, and coffee pricing.
Second, whether Chipotle’s high-protein menu and equipment rollout can flip transactions positive after four straight negative quarters.
Third, capital allocation. Starbucks is protecting its 64th consecutive quarter of dividends despite negative shareholders’ equity of $8.5 billion. Chipotle is buying back stock aggressively, with $1.7 billion remaining on the authorization.
Why I Lean Toward Starbucks Today, But Keep Chipotle on the Bench I lean Starbucks right now. The data actually supports the story Niccol is telling, and shares are up 25.36% year to date at $104.27. That said, a 79 P/E leaves little room for a stumble, and insiders have been net sellers.
Chipotle looks more interesting for turnaround investors comfortable with volatility. The stock is down 37.66% over the past year to $35.39, yet analysts still carry a $42.88 target and 26 buy or strong-buy ratings. If Boatwright gets transactions positive by mid-2026, that gap closes fast. Until then, I want to see one clean quarter of positive traffic before I would step in.
Want Up To $1,000? SoFi Is Giving New Active Invest Users Free StockLooking to grow your money but unsure where to begin? SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion—open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $1,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts.
From $0 commission trading to fractional shares and automated investing, this app is designed to simplify investing for everyone, whether you’re just starting or already experienced. Its easy to sign up and secure your bonus.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
After years of decline, Intel (INTC 5.61%) appears to be on track for a dramatic comeback. Under the leadership of Lip-Bu Tan, investors are becoming increasingly confident that Intel can remain a player in the semiconductor industry.
Nonetheless, Intel stock has risen by about 425% over the past year, taking its stock price and valuation to elevated levels. Thus, the question for investors is whether that stock price growth will undermine the chip stock's performance over the next five years.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
The Intel comeback Without question, Intel had been on the decline since the early part of the last decade. Innovation began to slow after the retirement and passing of its founders. That created openings for its longtime rival Advanced Micro Devices to overtake it technically and for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) to surpass it as a manufacturer.
Moreover, even when the previous CEO Pat Gelsinger attempted to make it a market leader in central processing units (CPUs) and third-party manufacturing, Nvidia's development of AI accelerators appeared to push it further behind.
Fortunately, Tan, the CEO who transformed Cadence Design Systems, appears poised to make Intel more competitive. As previously mentioned, Intel has mastered the 18A manufacturing process, which can produce chips as small as 1.8 nanometers (nms), allowing it to pioneer next-generation AI processors.
With that, he has begun to transform Intel into a company that could compete in manufacturing with TSMC on some levels, helping to reassert America's relevance in chip manufacturing.
Additionally, CPUs have become increasingly critical in data centers for managing workflows for CPUs. With Tan revamping Intel's business, this development bodes well for the company, particularly since Grand View Research projects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 29% for the AI chip market through 2030.
Today's Change
(
-5.61
%) $
-7.12
Current Price
$
119.90
Intel by the numbers Unfortunately, even after Intel's massive AI rally, the aforementioned stock gains appear largely based on speculation. Its $13.6 billion in revenue for the first quarter of 2026 was up 7% year over year. That improved over the 4% revenue decline in 2025 but is a far cry from the massive revenue growth of Nvidia and TSMC.
Moreover, its $3.7 billion net loss in Q1 follows its $0.6 billion net loss in 2025. Also, even though growth should improve, analysts forecast 11% revenue growth in 2026, with only a marginal improvement projected in 2027. Thus, it will likely take years to match the growth rate of competitors, if it gets there at all.
Furthermore, Intel has no price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on a GAAP basis. Still, even after its considerable stock gains, Intel's 11 price-to-sales (P/S) ratio lags its largest competitors. That indicates that investors should probably not sell Intel stock on valuation concerns.
INTC PS Ratio data by YCharts.
Still, as previously mentioned, much of the stock gains are likely tied to speculation. Hence, with Intel's comparatively modest revenue growth, the lower sales multiple does not necessarily reflect a discount when considering its peers' revenue growth.
Ultimately, it is probably too early to tell where Intel will be over the next five years, but I think the stock will outperform the market over that time frame.
Admittedly, five-year projections on stock prices are speculative by their nature. This is especially true for Intel, since the recent financials and near-term projections point to considerably more modest growth than its nearest competitors are likely to report.
Nonetheless, Tan has earned a reputation for orchestrating turnarounds in his industry, and the breakthrough with the 18A process technology confirms that success. That advancement also serves as a tangible indication that Intel can better compete with AMD in the CPU market and with TSMC in manufacturing. That means investors should expect accelerated revenue growth if Grand View's projected CAGR is any indication.
When it comes to individual investors, Intel probably remains too speculative for the risk-averse. However, with an appetite for risk, one has an excellent chance of outperforming the market with Intel stock over the next five years despite the recent run-up in the stock price.
Shares in Intel Corporation (INTC 5.61%) soared by 21.8% in June, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. There are probably two reasons for the increase, and both speak to the business's longer-term growth potential.
Intel and Apple make an agreement? While its important to note that neither company has confirmed reaching an agreement, in mid-June President Trump announced that Apple (AAPL +4.88%) amd Intel had reached an agreement that they would design and manufacture chips in the U.S. The deal, if confirmed, would be good news for Intel's foundry business as it tries to build scale and better compete with market leader Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM 2.15%).
Today's Change
(
-5.61
%) $
-7.12
Current Price
$
119.90
A deal would also be in line with the Trump administration's determination to encourage domestic manufacturing, and particularly with key technology providers like Apple. For example, the administration invested and entered into a public-private partnership with rare-earth company MP Materials in July of last year, which was closely followed by a $500 million long-term supply agreement for rare earth magnets between MP Materials and Apple. Given that the Trump administration also invested in Intel in 2025 (acquiring 10% of the company), it's reasonable to expect more pressure for an Apple/Intel deal.
Intel's core business has growth prospects Intel's core business of making central processing units (CPUs) is often seen as secondary to the AI data center build-out, as graphics processing units (GPUs) from Nvidia and others have grabbed attention. GPUs are specialized for building and training large language models (LLMs) and are therefore essential to the buildout of AI infrastructure. Meanwhile, CPUs are used relatively more for inference, such as the AI applications that agents actually run.
Image source: Getty Images.
Indeed, Intel CFO David Zinsner noted on the April earnings call that the GPU-to-CPU ratio in training solutions was up to 8:1, but could drop to 3:1 in inference. He expounded on those remarks in June at a Bank of America technology conference, stating, "the ratio of CPUs to GPUs is growing meaningfully as we get from training to inference, inference to agentic and multiagent and reinforced learning. So it's just going to drive a lot of CPU requirements."
As the market's recognition of the longer-term growth potential in inference AI spending crystallizes, Intel's role in CPU manufacturing will likely be better recognized.
Where next for Intel An Apple deal would be good news, and its confirmation would probably be good news for the stock. Meanwhile, the ongoing recognition of the growing importance of inference spending should also create upside potential for the stock.
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Intel, MP Materials, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA:MSTY) is the single-stock income product retail investors flocked to when MicroStrategy (now Strategy) was climbing alongside Bitcoin. MSTY promises weekly cash from selling options tied to MSTR exposure, and in 2024 it delivered headline yields north of 100%. The picture in 2026 looks very different: MSTY trades at $13.58 after falling roughly 70% over the past year, and the most recent weekly distribution came in at just $0.1549 per share. This piece walks through how the fund actually generates income and whether the payout is durable from here.
How MSTY manufactures its yield MSTY runs a synthetic covered-call strategy rather than holding MicroStrategy shares outright: buy call options and sell put options on MSTR to build a synthetic long position, then sell short-dated call options against that exposure. The premiums collected from writing those calls are what fund the distributions. Because MSTR is one of the most volatile large-cap names in the market, the options it sells trade at extremely rich premiums, which is the entire reason MSTY exists.
That mechanic has two consequences investors need to internalize. First, the yield is a direct function of MSTR’s implied volatility. When MSTR whipsaws, premiums balloon and distributions rise. When volatility compresses, premiums shrink. Second, the short calls cap upside. If MSTR rips higher, MSTY captures only a sliver of the gain, but if MSTR falls, MSTY absorbs most of the loss net of the premium collected.
The distribution is shrinking fast The trajectory of the payout tells the story better than any yield quote. In 2024, monthly distributions ranged from $1.85 to $4.42 per share. By 2025, monthly amounts had already compressed, and YieldMax shifted MSTY to a weekly schedule in the fourth quarter. In 2026, weekly distributions have ranged from $0.5553 down to $0.1549, with the trend clearly pointing lower over the last two months.
Two forces are behind the shrinkage. MSTR has fallen about 75% over the past year to roughly $101, which mechanically reduces the notional value MSTY can write calls against. And Bitcoin, the asset that drives Strategy’s balance sheet, is down around 44% year over year to roughly $61,500. Lower underlying price plus cooling volatility equals smaller premiums to distribute.
Read: Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.
NAV erosion is the real story A distribution stream only matters if the capital producing it holds up. MSTY’s NAV has not. The ETF is down 31% year to date and roughly 70% over the trailing year. Structurally, capped upside plus uncapped downside guarantees that in a sustained drawdown, the fund cannot recover NAV as quickly as its underlying, even if MSTR eventually rallies.
Total return is what actually matters. A holder who bought MSTY a year ago collected large distributions, but the share price collapse has swamped the income. Reddit’s wallstreetbets community is running very bearish on the ticker, with recent threads centered on liquidation stories rather than income, which captures the mood.
Verdict on the payout MSTY’s distribution is not safe in any traditional sense. The fund pays from option premiums whose size is dictated week to week by MSTR’s price and volatility. As long as MSTR trades actively, MSTY will pay something. The amount will keep drifting with volatility, and the NAV will keep bleeding on downside moves.
This fund makes sense only for investors who genuinely want leveraged exposure to MSTR’s volatility and treat the distributions as a return of that exposure rather than reliable income. Anyone using MSTY as a retirement income sleeve is taking equity-like drawdown risk for a payout the manager cannot promise. For diversified options income with more stable NAV behavior, broader index covered-call funds like the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA:JEPI) or JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA:JEPQ) sit at the opposite end of the spectrum: lower headline yield, materially less NAV decay.
If You’ve Been Thinking About Retirement, Pay Attention (sponsor) Retirement planning doesn’t have to feel overwhelming. The key is finding expert guidance, and SmartAsset’s simple quiz makes it easier than ever for you to connect with a vetted financial advisor. Here’s how:
Answer a Few Simple Questions.
Get Matched with Vetted Advisors
Choose Your Fit
Why wait? Start building the retirement you’ve always dreamed of. Get started today! (sponsor)
Arrow symbol glowing amid black arrow symbols on black background. Horizontal composition with copy space. Stock market and finance concept.
getty
Wall Street analysts have one job: predict where companies’ earnings are going in the coming quarter. Sounds simple enough, except said suits aren’t so good at it!
For the most recent earnings season, these forecasting fruit flies buzzed around modeling 12% earnings growth for the quarter. The S&P 500’s companies showed 27% profit growth—more than double what the “experts” predicted in their spreadsheets. They were way off.
So what does it mean when earnings come in at more than double the forecast? It means these companies have plenty of room—and reason—to hand more of that cash back to us. And that matters because over the long run stock prices follow their dividends.
We call this the dividend magnet: a stock’s payout tends to pull its price along with it. When a company cuts its dividend, the stock tanks—that’s the bad scenario. When a company raises its dividend, even at a yearly clip, its price moves at that same rate.
Buy in before the raise, and we lock in a fatter yield. Wait, and the market prices it away.
Which is why I’m watching eight stocks that have raised their payouts by as much as 77% over the past year. Historically these firms declare their raises during the summer months. This is the season to front run.
MORE FOR YOU
The “Hidden” YieldersThe most powerful dividend raisers often come from stocks that many investors overlook because of their thin headline yields. But if the raises continue at a frenetic pace, today’s fractional yields can be tomorrow’s fat paychecks.
Here’s a quick rundown of these mighty mini-payers:
Argan (AGX, 0.3% dividend yield): This construction engineering firm sat on a flat dividend for years—then started hiking in 2023. The payout has doubled in just three years, including a 33.3% boost last year, following an explosion in the bottom line that’s expected to continue this fiscal year and next. Expected dividend announcement: Mid-SeptemberChemed (CHE, 0.5% dividend yield): This bizarre holding company is held up by two major businesses: Roto-Rooter (the plumbing and drain cleaning service) and Vitas Healthcare (a large hospice and palliative care provider). Chemed has been raising its dividend without interruption for the better part of two decades, and it’s still hiking at a rapid clip—it has more than doubled its payout over the past five years and upped the ante by 20% in 2025 despite a pullback in profits. This year and next, the pros expect profits to rebound by double digits. Expected dividend announcement: Early AugustHowmet Aerospace (HWM, 0.2% dividend yield): Earlier this year, this engineered-products maker looked poised to make another semiannual dividend hike in late January—and then it didn’t. It’s not for lack of resources. Net income grew by 23% in 2025, and the pros see 33% growth this year and 20% in 2027. And HWM currently pays out less than 10% of 2026 earnings estimates. If Howmet were to adopt an annual dividend-raise schedule, the next hike would likely come sometime this summer—a year after it declared a 12-cent distribution that was 50% better YoY. Expected dividend announcement: Late JulyComfort Systems (FIX, 0.2% dividend yield): This HVAC specialist has been growing like a weed—its net income nearly doubled in 2025, shares have rocketed 260% higher over the past year, and the current dividend is 77.7% higher than it was a year ago. FIX has raised its dividend multiple times per year since 2021 and has shelled out more cash for seven quarters straight. The pros expect no let-up in bottom-line growth, and with Comfort Systems paying out just 7% of this year’s earnings estimates, there’s no reason to expect any let-up in the distribution. Expected dividend announcement: Late JulyT-Mobile US (TMUS, 2.3% dividend yield): T-Mobile has evolved from a discount carrier into a true U.S. cellular powerhouse, going toe-to-toe with Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T). Now it’s trying to mirror those telcos’ giant dividends. The company started its program in 2023 and has already pumped up that payout by another 57%. The 2%-plus yield, while bigger than the other companies mentioned, still isn’t much compared to AT&T and Verizon—but T-Mobile is rapidly closing the gap. Expected dividend announcement: Mid-SeptemberNext up, our big dividends that could get even bigger:
Altria Group (MO)
Dividend Yield: 5.7%
2025 Increase: 4%
Projected Q3 Distribution Announcement: Mid- to late August
Altria (MO) is best-known for its Philip Morris USA segment, which is responsible for the Marlboro brand and is far and away the company’s top revenue driver. But between increasingly stiff anti-smoking legislation and very real declines in volumes for years, some investors have given up the industry—and Altria—for dead.
But the company is putting increasing focus on its smokeless products, which include Copenhagen and Skoal smokeless tobacco, On! Oral nicotine pouches, NJOY e-vapor products and—through a joint venture with JT Group called Horizon Innovations—heated tobacco products. Nicotine pouches, for instance, might represent just 10% of the country’s nicotine volumes, but it’s a high-growth segment that’s expanding by about 25% annually. Altria’s hoping to capitalize on this with the national launch of its On! Oral brand and the recent release of higher-strength pouches.
MO has also been helped by its ability to command high prices for its products, as well as moderation in cigarette volume declines. And shares continue to benefit from the pull of its large-but-still growing dividend.
MO Total Returns
Ycharts
Altria is a Dividend King, boasting more than five decades’ worth of uninterrupted dividend increases, so a dividend hike this summer seems like a sure thing. And it routinely makes its hike announcements in late August.
Equity pariah Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS) is a specialized investment manager that provides mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), closed-end funds (CEFs), insurance funds, separately managed accounts and more. Rather than a single large brand like Vanguard or Fidelity, Virtus is a partnership of numerous boutique investment advisers under a variety of flags: Voya, Ceredex, InfraCap, and more.
VRTS shares and dividend have largely been tethered to one another, which is what makes the past couple of years stand out.
VRTS Total Returns
Ycharts
Virtus’ troubles aren’t nothing. It’s an actively managed outfit during a time when most major fund providers are racing each other into the low-fee basement. Several of its most important funds have struggled.
But put together both the past few years’ profits and what analysts expect to come, and we’re still looking at an upward trend. Meanwhile, VRTS has almost tripled its quarterly dividend in just five years, from 82 cents per share in 2021 to $2.40 today.
If Virtus keeps the pedal down on the distribution, shares might finally snap out of their funk. We’ll likely find out in mid-August, which is when the company has been announcing its annual raises.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM)
Dividend Yield: 8.3%
2025 Increase: 10%
Projected Q3 Distribution Announcement: Late July
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is a master limited partnership (MLP) that owns, operates and develops a number of midstream energy assets, primarily located in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota. Those assets include natural gas and natural gas liquid (NGL) pipelines, gas processing facilities, crude oil terminals and gathering pipelines, water gathering pipelines, and more.
In early October 2025, I said HESM’s then-upcoming distribution announcement was a test. Chevron (CVX) closed on its acquisition of Hess (HES) in July, and it was an open question as to whether it would keep intact Hess Midstream’s streak of quarterly distribution hikes, which dates back to the payout’s start in 2017.
HESM Total Returns
Ycharts
Historically, HESM has delivered a drumbeat of 1%-3% quarter-over-quarter raises that have amounted to roughly 10% year-over-year growth. But the company recently pared back its full-year capex guidance and raised its free cash flow outlook, which could result in modestly thicker raises in the quarters to come (though it muddies the potential for growth). Whatever it chooses to do, it’s likely to come in late July.
Brett Owens is Chief Investment Strategist for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, get your free copy his latest special report: Your Early Retirement Portfolio: Huge Dividends—Every Month—Forever.
With the cost of living rising, more investors are recognizing the importance of generating income through dividend stocks. After all, those income payments can provide an extra cushion in retirement.
That's why Nike (NKE +2.44%) is receiving increased attention. With a yield of 4% as of this writing, it's paying out more than Coca-Cola (KO +3.51%), a long-term holding for many dividend investors. The beverage maker is a Dividend King, earning that title by increasing its dividend payout for more than 50 consecutive years.
But as you'll see in a minute, there's a reason to look at more than just Nike's yield when making an investment decision.
Image source: Getty Images.
The appeal of an iconic brand When the Air Jordan was launched in 1985, it turned owning a pair of Nike shoes into a status symbol. In recent years, however, the cool factor around Nike has started to disappear.
Consumer tastes have changed, and Nike has been criticized for relying too much on past success rather than innovation. The company also made it more difficult to find and buy its shoes, as it relied on a direct-to-consumer model rather than working with wholesale partners. Inventory has also built up, and Nike has had to rely on price cuts to move excessive merchandise.
The stock price has suffered all along the way. As of this writing, it is down more than 70% over the past five years and has dropped 35% this year alone.
The company is still trying to execute its turnaround plan, but it had a few bright spots in its recent earnings report. When Nike reported its fourth-quarter 2026 earnings, it beat expectations for both revenue and earnings per share. Even though sales slumped in China, it still reported $1.3 billion in sales in the country, beating expectations of $1.2 billion.
Today's Change
(
2.44
%) $
1.05
Current Price
$
44.11
Always counting on Coca-Cola It's not in the most exciting of businesses, but Coca-Cola does offer consistency. Over the past 64 years, it has consecutively increased its dividend payouts. One company that understands the power of that consistency better than anyone is Berkshire Hathaway.
Warren Buffett began buying shares of Coca-Cola in 1988, and Berkshire currently owns a 9.3% stake in the company. With this investment, Berkshire is generating hundreds of millions of dollars every quarter in dividends from Coca-Cola.
While it is better known for its dividend payouts than for stock price appreciation, Coca-Cola has performed well thus far in 2026. That's in part due to success with organic sales, rather than just increasing prices. In its 2026 first-quarter earnings, Coca-Cola reported 13% growth in unit case volume for its Coca-Cola Zero Sugar brand, a 5% increase in water, and an 8% increase in tea.
As of June 30, shares of Coca-Cola are up 16.2% in 2026, beating the 9.5% return of the S&P 500.
Today's Change
(
3.51
%) $
2.85
Current Price
$
84.14
The winner for July and beyond A higher yield makes Nike intriguing, but yield alone doesn't make it an automatic buy, given the volatility its stock price can face. Its turnaround is still underway, as evidenced by its Q4 2026 results. While it had some wins in that quarter, revenue in North America, Nike's largest market, fell short of expectations.
At this point in time, an investment in Nike is centered more on the company reversing its missteps and losses from the past several years, rather than being an income investment. That's because the dividend yield won't matter much if the stock keeps slumping lower. The Nike stock price could offer more upside than Coca-Cola's if the company can execute its turnaround plan, but that also means taking on additional risk as a shareholder, as there's no guarantee the turnaround will work.
In comparison, Coca-Cola is a steadier performer and has proven itself more as a dividend investment, with 64 years of consecutive dividend increases. More aggressive investors may favor Nike, but Coca-Cola offers the reliability that many may be seeking for a more stable income.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired First Solar securities between February 26, 2025 and February 24, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/FSLR.
First Solar Case Details
The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that:
Defendants had overstated First Solar's capacity to manage the impact of U.S. tariff policy on the Company's business Defendants understated the extent to which its responses to U.S. tariff policy, including the intentional underutilization of production facilities in Malaysia and Vietnam, and attempted relocation of production to the U.S., were likely to negatively impact First Solar's projected performance in the 2026 fiscal year; as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.What's Next for First Solar Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/FSLR, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in First Solar you have until August 24, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to First Solar Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for First Solar Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/302693
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Realty Income and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF provide attractive, AI-insulated income streams with strong risk mitigation. O offers a 5.1% yield, an investment-grade balance sheet, an 8.7-year average lease maturity, and defensive monthly income with embedded growth. JAAA delivers a 5.4% yield from AAA CLO tranches, offering de-risked, technology-light exposure and a superior yield to T-bills.
An investor who put $1,000 into Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) stock one year ago would now in loss over the period despite the company’s strong business performance.
On July 7, 2025, Palantir stock traded at $139 per share. As of July 5, 2026, the stock was trading at $129.30.
Based on those prices, a $1,000 investment would have purchased about 7.19 PLTR shares a year ago. At today’s price, those shares would be worth approximately $930, a drop of about 7%.
PLTR one-year stock price chart. Source: Finbold The decline highlights the disconnect between Palantir’s operational performance and its stock market returns over the past year.
While the company has delivered record revenue growth and expanding profitability, investors have reassessed valuations across the artificial intelligence sector, putting pressure on shares.
Palantir stock fundamentals Palantir has continued to post some of the strongest growth metrics in the software industry. In the first quarter of 2026, the company reported revenue of $1.63 billion, up 85% year-over-year, marking the fastest growth rate since becoming a public company.
The company’s U.S. commercial business has been the primary growth engine, with revenue rising 133% year-over-year to $595 million. U.S. government revenue also remained strong, increasing 84% to $687 million.
Profitability has improved alongside revenue growth with the software giant reporting a GAAP operating margin of 46% and generated $925 million in adjusted free cash flow during the quarter. The company also ended the period with roughly $8 billion in cash and short-term investments.
Following the strong results, management raised its full-year 2026 guidance and now expects revenue of approximately $7.65 billion, representing about 71% annual growth.
Despite accelerating revenue growth and rising earnings, Palantir stock has retreated from its 2025 highs as investors reassessed the company’s valuation.
Even after the pullback, PLTR stock continues to trade at premium multiples compared to most software peers, reflecting expectations for sustained AI-driven growth.
The stock has also faced broader pressure from volatility across high-growth technology names and shifting sentiment toward artificial intelligence investments.
While the past year has produced a negative return for shareholders, many analysts remain optimistic about Palantir’s long-term prospects due to growing demand for its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), expanding commercial adoption, and strong profitability metrics.
Best Crypto Exchange for Intermediate Traders and Investors
Invest in cryptocurrencies and 3,000+ other assets including stocks and precious metals.
0% commission on stocks - buy in bulk or just a fraction from as little as $10. Other fees apply. For more information, visit etoro.com/trading/fees.
Copy top-performing traders in real time, automatically.
eToro USA is registered with FINRA for securities trading.
30+ million Users worldwide
eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
Join Finbold's newsroom, become a Sales Executive today! Apply now to join Finbold as a crypto/finance news writer!
Over the past year, shares of Micron Technology (MU 5.68%) have soared more than 800%. As of this writing (June 30), Micron stock trades at $1,142 and sits comfortably in the trillion-dollar club. Micron's rapid ascent is naturally leading investors to ask whether the company is positioned for a stock split.
Let's explore the mechanics of stock splits, the typical reasons why companies pursue them, and whether such a move would deliver meaningful benefits to Micron.
Today's Change
(
-5.68
%) $
-58.69
Current Price
$
973.59
What is a stock split, and how does it work? During a stock split, a company simply increases the total number of outstanding shares by distributing additional shares on a proportional basis. For example, in a 5-for-1 split, a company with 1 million shares outstanding at $1,000 each would end up with 5 million shares trading at $200 post-split. In essence, the company's overall market capitalization remains unchanged because the reduction in stock price is offset by the increase in share count.
Image source: Getty Images.
Why do companies perform stock splits? Broadly speaking, companies pursue stock splits to improve both the perceived affordability and liquidity of their shares. When a stock trades at a level that appears expensive, smaller retail investors generally hesitate to purchase even a single share. This limits market participation and can potentially reduce trading volume.
A lower share price following the split erases this psychological barrier, often ushering in a broader base of buyers. Higher liquidity can make a position more attractive to institutional investors who prefer stocks with active markets.
Moreover, stock splits tend to coincide with periods of strong business performance and can be interpreted as a signal of management's confidence in future growth. While the action itself does not create any economic value for the business, the subsequent increase in investor enthusiasm can support continued upward momentum in the share price.
Will Micron split its stock? As shares approach $1,200, Micron stock is well above the range where most retail investors comfortably buy. The obvious perk for smaller investors with limited capital is that a stock split would lower the entry point in terms of absolute dollars to begin building a position. From a strategic standpoint, a split aligns with the practices that other semiconductor stocks -- such as Nvidia and Broadcom -- have completed during comparable rallies in recent years.
Given Micron's prolonged share price appreciation, announcing a split may be viewed favorably by the market as a step to sustain momentum. Operationally, however, the company gains little from performing a stock split. Micron's revenue, earnings, and competitive position would remain unaffected.
Overall, a stock split represents nothing more than a cosmetic adjustment that supports investor accessibility and sentiment without introducing meaningful downside. For these reasons, I do not think Micron will split its stock anytime soon.
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: Z) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Zillow securities between February 11, 2025 and May 7, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/Z.
Zillow Case Details
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
(1) Zillow's agreement with Redfin Corporation was not a "partnership," but rather an acquisition of Redfin's business;
(2) as a result of the Redfin Agreement, Zillow faced a materially heightened risk of regulatory scrutiny and liability under federal antitrust laws;
(3) upon the filing of an antitrust lawsuit, Zillow continued to downplay its legal exposure; and
(4) as a result, defendants' statements about Zillow's business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
What's Next for Zillow Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/Z. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Zillow you have until August 10, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Zillow Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Zillow Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
In the days following its IPO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SPCX) surged 25%, rewarding early investors and turning its owner, Elon Musk, into a trillionaire. The following week the stock sank below $160, sending most investors into the red and forcing Musk back into the “lowly” hundreds-billionaire class.
SpaceX isn’t alone in its volatility. That same week, shares of Micron Technology Inc. (MU) gapped down 15% on a broader tech selloff before shooting straight back up on blowout earnings.
As InvestorPlace Senior Analyst Louis Navellier noted in a recent Market 360 issue, the AI market has been all over the place lately.
Now, this sometimes happens during late-stage rallies. Traders know that certain stocks are overbought, so they sell out at the first sign of trouble. A tiny dip can trigger a panic.
But as I mentioned in last Sunday’s Digest, this volatility is also a byproduct of artificial intelligence. Millions of trading algorithms, advisors, and investors are increasingly relying on the same AI-powered tools. And it’s creating a new kind of “trading convergence” that causes people to jump in and out of stocks at the same time.
It can lead to massive losses of wealth when trades go wrong.
That’s why Louis rarely chases the crowd. Instead, he’s looking for signs that typically happen before AI systems catch wind, with the help of his system called Precursor Intelligence (P.I.). It helps him find companies with improving fundamentals and accelerating money flow before every AI tool jumps on board. You can click here to hear him talk more about it.
Last week, I showcased three of these top picks: Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN), Monolithic Power Systems Inc. (MPWR), and Oncology Institute Inc. (TOI).
This week, I’d like to add two more.
Stock to Buy #1: The AI Dark Horse Over the past two months, shares of Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) have lagged the broader AI market. Its top-rated Gemini model is now the fifth best, as graded by Artificial Analysis, an AI benchmarking firm. It will soon fall to sixth place when OpenAI’s latest GPT-5.6 version finishes its testing. Alphabet’s shares have slipped 10% since their mid-May peak.
Gemini (dark green) is starting to look rather average
Yet, Louis’ system believes this bearishness is overdone. The company earns an “A” grade for its “follow the money” score and has the receipts to back it up. The company is one of the fastest-growing companies in our universe of stocks, and it’s the only hyperscale AI data center firm expected to remain cashflow positive in every quarter this year.
I believe this assessment is right on several counts, which I outlined last month. Alphabet has a dominant search business, efficient data center chips, and momentum against OpenAI. Together, this suggests its fair stock value is somewhere in the mid-$400 range; it’s now trading around $355.
And a recent AI model launch by Chinese startup Z.ai only reinforces that conviction.
On June 13, Z.ai launched a large language model (LLM) called GLM-5.2, which Artificial Analysis determined is better than Alphabet’s two flagship models. And after test-riding the new LLM, I believe this is a surprisingly good development for Alphabet because the system is entirely open-source. Users can download GLM-5.2 for free, read through its source code, and take anything they like for their own use.
In other words, Alphabet can take the model for itself.
That should prove a windfall for the search giant, which was previously fighting two separate battles:
Low-cost models for individual users for Google Search and Android, and High-end models to attract corporate users onto its Google Cloud Platform. GLM-5.2 helps fight that first, since it’s good enough for daily use and surprisingly cheap to run. You don’t need a cutting-edge model to give directions to the nearest golf course… and you certainly don’t need one to set a 7 a.m. phone alarm. You only need something that’s dependable enough not to wake you up at 3 a.m. or send you to the wrong place.
That means Google can focus on that second arena, where it is already doing quite well. The company doubled the number of $100 million to $1 billion deals in its most recent quarter. And now that it can focus its efforts on high-end AI models, it will likely continue to pull ahead of rivals in the coming quarters.
And so, I continue to see further upside in Alphabet. Shares are already up 27% since I flagged them last November (even with the recent drawdown), and they still have more room to climb.
Stock to Buy #2: The Return of U.S. Drug Development Last week, I wrote about the U.S. government suddenly becoming pro-pharma again.
In April, Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. admitted to Congress that “China is now eating our lunch” in drug development and promised to make changes.
Since then, agencies overseen by RFK Jr. have made an almost 180-degree turn. In June, one group unanimously recommended its first vaccine of the current administration, and a separate one launched a project called Operation TrialBlazer to fast-track clinical research.
I recommended Oncology Institute Inc. (TOI) as a stock to buy.
This week, I’d like to add one more healthcare firm to this list:
Moderna Inc. (MRNA).
You will likely know Moderna for its development of the Covid-19 vaccine, a therapy that only took 10 weeks to develop and another 10 months to reach approval. You will also probably know that Moderna’s stock price fell over 94% between 2021 and 2025 after vaccine demand fell off and mRNA vaccines became a culture war lightning rod.
It hasn’t been easy for the drugmaker. In President Trump’s first year back in office, the HHS terminated Moderna’s pandemic bird-flu contract, stopped recommending Covid-19 shots for healthy children, cut $500 million in mRNA vaccine funding, and removed all 17 members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory committee. Moderna was forced to cut projects and funnel its remaining cash into fewer, higher-priority clinical trials.
But the drugmaker seems to be back. On June 18, Food and Drug Administration advisors backed Moderna’s mRNA flu vaccine, capping a 20% rally in the stock. At roughly the same time, MRNA moved from a “C” grade in Louis’ system to a “B” on unusually high smart money buying.
The fundamental story has only since improved. On June 25, the company gave exciting details at its annual Science Day that suggest far faster growth for its oncology drugs, known as “cancer vaccines.” These are programmable therapies that can be tailored to individuals or targeted more broadly at common cancer markers for off-the-shelf use.
The most promising of Moderna’s tailored drugs, known as intismeran autogene, is currently undergoing Phase 3 trials for treating skin cancer. Results will be published by the end of this year, and analysts expect over $3.5 billion in annual revenues by 2035. The same therapy is also being tested on kidney cancers, lung cancers, and more.
The company is also working on several off-the-shelf therapies that are showing early promise. At least one of these should become a blockbuster, according to analysts at Morningstar, and could lay the groundwork for “multiplex” therapies. This is where one drug seeks out multiple targets at once, increasing the likelihood of success.
Most importantly, Washington’s mood around drug development is changing. RFK Jr. himself has said that China “went from running 3% of clinical trials to running 30%” and that “we are losing scientists, we’re losing our IPs… and we’re going to lose our biosecurity.”
And if the federal government wants to flood the zone with money to develop more drugs, then Moderna is the most obvious candidate for it. Programmable mRNA vaccines are incredibly fast to develop, and this drugmaker has plenty in partial development that are ready to resume.
Walking Apart from the Crowd You’ll notice that Alphabet and Moderna are not exactly the most popular names among retail investors. Google is often seen as too large to grow further, while the politicization of vaccines has turned a generation of investors off Moderna entirely.
Here’s why that matters: AI systems are exceptional at pricing what’s already in the numbers. They can “see” everything that’s happened in the past five-plus decades and often know precisely what investors are doing today. They’re also relatively good at extrapolating if the future looks anything like the past.
What AI does not do so well is predict changes. And the reality is that Alphabet and Moderna both run platforms that can adapt quickly. Alphabet can absorb a free, open-source model like GLM-5.2 and turn it into a dozen cheap consumer products overnight. Moderna’s programmable mRNA lets it point the same underlying technology at everything from the flu to skin cancer.
That’s the real opportunity in a market ruled by trading convergence. The more investors lean on the same tools that only see today’s data, the more they underprice the companies whose best chapters haven’t been written yet.
That’s exactly what Louis built Precursor Intelligence to do. He’s looking to pinpoint companies with strong fundamentals and accelerating money flow.
Louis just recorded a presentation walking investors through that system, and how it’s predicting a major rally in stocks beyond AI. So, if you’d like to get ahead of the next wave instead of getting swept up in it, I urge you to watch Louis’ free broadcast here.
All of us here at InvestorPlace wish you a happy Fourth of July.
Until next week,
Thomas Yeung, CFA
Market Analyst, InvestorPlace
Thomas Yeung is a market analyst and portfolio manager of the Omnia Portfolio, the highest-tier subscription at InvestorPlace. He is the former editor of Tom Yeung’s Profit & Protection, a free e-letter about investing to profit in good times and protecting gains during the bad.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Roblox To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Roblox between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
Watch our latest video highlighting the key allegations: https://youtu.be/rFoJC-j0rW0
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Roblox Corporation (“Roblox” or the “Company”) (NYSE: RBLX) and reminds investors of the August 7, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Roblox’s organic growth potential; notably, that Roblox would see a significant slowdown in its growth rates as enrollment in the age verification rollout would quickly taper, compounding the resulting slowdown in on-platform communication, resulting in app store rating reductions and a swift reduction in organic growth. Such statements absent these material facts caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase Roblox’s securities at artificially inflated prices.
On April 30, 2026, Roblox announced its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2026. Management slashed bookings growth guidance down to 8-12% and a corresponding decline to margin expectations. Defendants disclosed the age verification rollout had caused much more significant impacts engagement and organic growth than management had previously suggested and age check adoption had only increased to 51% global daily active users, from 45% at the end of the previous quarter.
Investors and analysts reacted immediately to Roblox’s revelation. The price of Roblox’s common stock declined dramatically. From a closing market price of $55.26 per share on April 30, 2026, Roblox’s stock price fell to $45.13 per share on May 1, 2026, a decline of about 18.33% in the span of just a single day.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Roblox’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Verra class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/RBLX or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Roblox Corporation Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Roblox Corporation securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Roblox Corporation securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that the Company's age verification rollout would cause a significant slowdown in growth rates, reduce on-platform communication, lead to app store rating reductions, and materially impair Roblox's organic growth potential. As the truth emerged on April 30, 2026 — when Roblox announced Q1 fiscal 2026 results, slashed bookings growth guidance to just 8–12%, disclosed margin deterioration, and revealed that age verification adoption had only reached 51% of global daily active users (up from just 45% the prior quarter), signaling far greater engagement impacts than management had previously suggested — RBLX's stock price fell from $55.26 to $45.13 per share, a decline of approximately 18.33% in a single day, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Roblox Corporation class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Roblox Corporation (RBLX) securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Roblox securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Roblox employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Roblox Corporation lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Roblox Corporation class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Roblox investor who purchased RBLX securities during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is August 7, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Roblox Corporation stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Roblox Corporation (RBLX) securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Roblox Corporation securities class action is August 7, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/RBLX for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Roblox securities between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/RBLX.
Roblox Case Details
The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:
Defendants overstated Roblox's organic growth potential and the Company's ability to sustain "tremendous organic growth" following the rollout of its age verification features; Defendants downplayed and failed to adequately disclose the severity and certainty of headwinds associated with the age verification rollout, including a slowdown in user enrollment, reduced on-platform communication, and associated negative impacts on app store ratings; as a result of these undisclosed trends, Roblox's growth rates were expected to decline more sharply than represented; and as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.What's Next for Roblox Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/RBLX, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Roblox you have until August 7, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Roblox Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Roblox Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/300891
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Five hundred dollars a month is not enough to replace a paycheck, but it can cover a real bill: a used-car payment, a utility-heavy month, or a meaningful slice of grocery spending. This article builds around a $6,000 annual income stream produced entirely by a portfolio, with no planned withdrawals from principal. The capital required ranges from roughly $60,000 to more than $171,000, depending on how much yield you chase and how much risk you accept.
The 10-year Treasury recently sat near 4.4%, while the FDIC’s national average 12-month CD rate was 1.65%. That means every tier below should be measured against what an investor could earn without taking stock-market risk, even though Treasuries and CDs have their own limits. Past a certain point on the yield ladder, you may be renting income from your own principal.
The Conservative Tier: 3% to 4% Yield At a 3.5% blended yield, $6,000 of annual income requires roughly $171,000 in capital. This is the dividend-growth lane, populated by consumer staples, healthcare, and regulated utilities.
PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP | PEP Price Prediction) yields about 4.2% after a 4% dividend hike that marked its 54th consecutive year of increases. Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) yields closer to 2.1% after delivering its 64th straight annual raise, lifting the quarterly payment from $1.30 to $1.34. NextEra Energy yields about 2.8% and has guided for roughly 10% annual dividend growth through 2026.
The tradeoff is capital intensity. You need the most money up front. What you get is a portfolio whose income stream may grow over time, often with less pressure to reach for fragile double-digit yields. The share prices can still fall, but the goal in this tier is dividend growth first and maximum current income second.
The Moderate Tier: 5% to 7% Yield At 6%, the same $6,000 requires about $100,000. This is the range of net-lease REITs, preferred shares, midstream energy partnerships, and high-dividend equity funds.
Realty Income (NYSE:O) yields roughly 5.1% and pays monthly, with 670 consecutive monthly dividends declared and 114 straight quarterly increases as of its recent company materials. The current monthly payout of about $0.2705 annualizes to roughly $3.25 per share.
The compromise is dividend growth. Realty Income’s dividends paid per share rose 1.8% in the first quarter of 2026 compared with the first quarter of 2025. The income record is unusually steady, but recent raises have not been large enough to outrun a serious inflation spike.
The Aggressive Tier: 8% to 12% Yield At 10%, $60,000 of capital produces $6,000 in income. Business development companies, mortgage REITs, and leveraged option-income funds live here.
Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) yields roughly 10.6% at a recent price of about $18, with a quarterly payout of $0.48. Main Street Capital yields about 6.2% on its regular monthly distribution, with supplemental dividends that can push the effective yield higher when they are declared.
The risk is principal. BDC shares can fall even when distributions continue, and their payouts depend heavily on the credit performance of middle-market borrowers. In a recession, income, market price, and net asset value can come under pressure at the same time.
Why The Lowest Yield Often Wins Johnson & Johnson’s quarterly dividend is now $1.34 after its 2026 increase, and the company has raised its dividend for 64 consecutive years. That is the power of dividend growth: the starting yield may look modest, but the income can compound if the business keeps raising its payout. A 10% yielder that holds its distribution flat for decades may deliver more income today but lose purchasing power over time.
The aggressive tier delivers more income today on less capital. The conservative tier delivers less income today, but some companies in that group have a long record of raising payouts. NextEra, for example, has guided for roughly 10% annual dividend growth through 2026 and 6% annual growth from year-end 2026 through 2028.
Before You Chase the Yield Price your actual spending, not your salary. If $500 covers a car payment, a utility bill, or a cluster of recurring household costs, that is your replacement number. Do not pad it with a round figure pulled from a retirement calculator.
Run a side-by-side total return comparison. Pull 10-year total returns for a dividend-growth name like JNJ against a high-yield name like ARCC, including reinvested dividends. The income gap may narrow once you account for price appreciation, dividend growth, and drawdowns.
Match the tier to the account. Many BDC and REIT distributions are taxed as ordinary income, which can reach a 37% top federal marginal rate before any applicable state taxes or surtaxes. Qualified dividends from companies such as PEP or JNJ can receive lower long-term capital gains tax rates. That makes tax-advantaged accounts especially useful for higher-yield holdings when the account type fits the investor’s broader plan.
A Better Test Than Yield Alone A $500 monthly income stream is not one portfolio. It is a tradeoff. The safest-looking income usually requires the most capital, while the highest yield often comes with the greatest risk to principal and future payouts. The right answer is not the largest percentage on the screen. It is the mix of yield, dividend growth, account placement, and risk that can keep the income useful after inflation and market stress have had their say.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
The equity REIT sector has transformed from an obscure $9 billion alternative asset niche into a mainstream component. While top-tier momentum favorites command premium multiples, extensive pockets of the broader property market sit at deep, cyclical discounts. Multi-year compounding consumer price inflation has created a widening gap between outdated contract rates and modern market baseline values.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Lucid Group To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Lucid Group between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Lucid Group, Inc. (“Lucid Group” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: LCID) and reminds investors of the July 28, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; (2) the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company’s business and financial results; (3) accordingly, the Defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid’s manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Lucid Group’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Lucid Group class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/LCID or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Lucid Group, Inc. Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Lucid Group securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Lucid Group securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing that a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity SUV and overstating the Company's manufacturing and delivery capabilities. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures — including an April 3, 2026 announcement that only 3,093 vehicles were delivered in Q1 2026 due to a 29-day delivery disruption caused by a supplier seat defect, an April 14, 2026 filing revealing Q1 revenue of just $280–$284 million against a consensus estimate of $433.8 million and a $1.05 billion capital raise, and a May 5, 2026 earnings report showing a net loss of over $1 billion and GAAP EPS of -$3.46 — LCID's stock price fell sharply across multiple trading sessions, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Lucid Group class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) stock between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Lucid Group securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Lucid Group employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Lucid Group lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Lucid Group class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Lucid Group investor who purchased LCID stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 28, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Lucid Group stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) stock between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Lucid Group securities class action is July 28, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/LCID for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Lucid securities between February 25, 2026 and April 13, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/LCID.
Lucid Case Details
The Complaint allegs that throughout the Class Period, Defendants failed to disclose that:
a supplier quality issue had significantly disrupted deliveries of the Lucid Gravity; the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company's business and financial results; accordingly, the defendants had overstated the purported enhancements to Lucid's manufacturing and delivery capabilities and overall operations; and as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.What's Next for Lucid Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/LCID, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Lucid you have until July 28, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Lucid Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Lucid Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/300161
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired ZoomInfo securities between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: bgandg.com/GTM.
ZoomInfo Case Details
The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose:
(1) The true state of ZoomInfo's slowing seat-based demand, weakening upsell opportunities, and deteriorating fundamentals across its downmarket and upmarket segments.
(2) That Defendants' optimistic growth narrative, including representations that full-year 2026 revenue guidance of $1.247–$1.267 billion was achievable and that Copilot penetration was on or ahead of schedule.
(3) That customers were migrating toward consumption-based models and developing internal AI-driven go-to-market solutions, trends Defendants minimized despite their material adverse impact on ZoomInfo's business.
On May 11, 2026, ZoomInfo reported its first quarter 2026 results and slashed its full-year revenue guidance by approximately $62 million
Following this news, the price of ZoomInfo's common stock declined dramatically, from a closing market price of $6.04 per share on May 11, 2026, ZoomInfo's stock price fell to $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026, a decline of about 33%.
What's Next for ZoomInfo Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: bgandg.com/GTM. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in ZoomInfo you have until August 24, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to ZoomInfo Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys’ fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for ZoomInfo Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Contact Info
Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or Nathan Miller
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
917-590-0911 | [email protected]
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, a nationally recognized investor-rights law firm, announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Zoetis Inc. (NYSE: ZTS) and certain of its officers.
This lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Zoetis securities between January 14, 2025 and May 6, 2026, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm's site: bgandg.com/ZTS.
Zoetis Case Details
The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements concerning the growth, competitive positioning, market share, and veterinarian adoption of key products within the Companion Animal segment while failing to disclose that:
veterinarian prescription growth and adoption of Zoetis' Librela, a canine pain treatment, were sharply weakening as clinicians became more cautious following FDA safety warnings concerning serious neurological complications in dogs; Zoetis' Simparica Trio was losing significant market share to a lower-priced competing canine parasiticide with broader indicated use in a slowing overall market; and Zoetis' dermatology products, Apoquel and Cytopoint, were losing substantial market share to a newly launched competing canine treatment.What's Next for Zoetis Investors?
A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm's site: bgandg.com/ZTS, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Client Relations Manager, Nathan Miller, of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 917-590-0911. If you suffered a loss in Zoetis you have until July 27, 2026, to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as lead plaintiff.
No Cost to Zoetis Investors
We, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC, represent investors in class actions on a contingency fee basis. That means we will ask the court to reimburse us for out-of-pocket expenses and attorneys' fees, usually a percentage of the total recovery, only if we are successful.
Why Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC for Zoetis Securities Class Action?
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a nationally recognized firm that represents investors in securities fraud class actions and shareholder derivative suits. Our firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors nationwide. More at www.bgandg.com
"Our practice centers on restoring investor capital and ensuring corporate accountability, which serves to uphold the essential integrity of the marketplace," said Peretz Bronstein, Founding Partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Attorney advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/299400
Source: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Dividend stocks remain a popular choice for investors seeking steady income and higher portfolio returns. However, with thousands of dividend-paying companies to choose from, identifying the right stocks can be challenging.
In this regard, recommendations from top Wall Street analysts can provide useful insights and help identify dividend stocks backed by solid fundamentals and with attractive upside potential.
Here are three dividend-paying stocks that are highlighted by Wall Street's top pros, as tracked by TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.
Permian ResourcesIndependent oil and natural gas company Permian Resources (PR) is this week's first dividend stock. The company recently paid a quarterly base cash dividend of 16 cents per share. At an annualized dividend of 64 cents per share, PR offers a dividend yield of 3.5%.
Recently, Evercore analyst Chris Baker initiated coverage of Permian Resources stock with a price target of $25. The analyst believes that the company is well positioned to benefit from improving U.S. shale demand after the Iran conflict, thanks to its low-breakeven inventory that can boost free cash flow growth. Baker also noted PR's disciplined consolidation in the Permian Basin.
Furthermore, the 5-star analyst highlighted the company's focus on a single basin and management's efficient capital allocations across expansion efforts, strategic acquisitions, and share buybacks. Baker noted that management focuses investments on the higher-return Northern Delaware Basin, helping boost profitability.
"The key piece of our work here, and the reason we think PR deserves a higher multiple relative to more finite or less flexible shale stories, is that PR runs an acquire and exploit model," said Baker.
He explained that Permian Resources deserves a premium valuation as it continually acquires and develops new high-quality assets instead of relying on a limited inventory, a strategy that is the market is underappreciating.
Baker ranks No. 862 among more than 12,300 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 75% of the time, delivering an average return of 48.3%. See Permian Resources Ownership Structure on TipRanks.
Valero EnergyValero Energy (VLO) is a manufacturer and marketer of petroleum-based and low-carbon liquid transportation fuels and petrochemical products. At a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share, or annualized dividend of $4.80 per share, VLO stock offers a yield of about 2%.
Heading into Valero's second-quarter earnings on July 30, Goldman Sachs analyst Neil Mehta reiterated a buy rating on VLO stock and increased the price target to $286 from $283 to reflect updated estimates.
Specifically, the 5-star analyst raised his 2026 and 2027 earnings per share estimates to $31.42 and $23.07 from $29.42 and $21.06, respectively, while leaving the 2028 EPS estimate unchanged at $20.37. Mehta made these revisions based on several factors, including updated commodity price assumptions and changes to refining capture rates.
Despite a strong year-to-date rally in VLO stock, Mehta still finds it compelling due to his more positive refining outlook. Moreover, the analyst sees the possibility of solid estimate revisions, which could drive the stock higher. He believes that Valero is well-positioned to benefit from improving refining market conditions due to its strong position in the Gulf Coast, solid balance sheet strength, and low-cost operations.
"Additionally, we believe the company's premium asset portfolio and crude slate optionality should support capture rates and stronger cash flow generation in the near-term, ultimately supporting shareholder returns," said Mehta.
Mehta ranks No. 742 among more than 12,300 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 59% of the time, delivering an average return of 10.2%. See Valero Energy Statistics on TipRanks.
Ovintiv Moving on to Ovintiv (OVV), a North American oil and natural gas producer. It has solid positions in North America's premier oil basins – the Permian and the Montney. OVV offers a quarterly dividend of 30 cents per share, or an annualized dividend of $1.20 per share, implying a 2.3% yield.
Following meetings with management, RBC Capital analyst Gregory Pardy reaffirmed a buy rating on Ovintiv stock with a price target of $70, highlighting that the stock is on RBC's Global Energy Best Ideas List.
"In our eyes, the depth of Ovintiv's Montney position, streamlined portfolio, strong balance sheet and enhanced shareholder returns afford investors with an attractive valuation re-rating opportunity over time," said Pardy.
The 5-star analyst stated that his meetings with management bolstered his confidence in the company's outlook and potential to achieve a higher valuation. Pardy noted Ovintiv's transformation, with the company streamlining its portfolio from six basins (including the Uinta, Bakken and Anadarko) to two – the Montney and Permian – while enhancing the depth of its inventory.
Pardy also emphasized OVV's improved shareholder returns and solid balance sheet following the recent sale of its assets in the Anadarko Basin for $3 billion.
Pardy ranks No. 169 among more than 12,300 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 64% of the time, delivering an average return of 22.3%. See Ovintiv Options Trading Activity on TipRanks.
Cheniere Energy Partners (CQP) remains a Buy, combining stable income with significant growth potential from Sabine Pass expansion. CQP's Q1 saw a 20.4% revenue increase, driven by pricing power and stable long-term contracts, despite margin compression and derivative losses. The planned Train 7 expansion at Sabine Pass could boost capacity by 33%, supporting a potential 11.6% income yield on current market cap.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Hub Group To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Hub Group between April 28, 2023 and May 11, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Hub Group, Inc. (“Hub Group” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: HUBG) and reminds investors of the August 28, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Hub Group’s financial statements prepared for the periods from Q1 2023 to Q4 2024, including annual reports for 2023 and 2024, contained material misstatements caused by the premature and incorrect recognition of certain transactions concerning, among other things, Hub Group’s operating revenue, operating income, revenue recognition, effectiveness of internal controls and procedures, and drivers of financial results and growth; and (2) Hub Group’s financial statements prepared for the periods from Q1 2025 to Q3 2025 contained material misstatements caused by the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable concerning, among other things, Hub Group’s operating expenses, purchased transportation and warehousing expenses, operating income, effectiveness of internal disclosure controls and procedures, and drivers of financial results and growth.
On February 5, 2026, Hub Group announced that the Company's financial statements for the first three quarters of 2025 should not be relied upon and would be restated due to "an error that resulted in the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable in the first nine months of 2025." The Company revealed that its reports for those quarters "were in each case materially misstated due to the aforementioned error and should no longer be relied upon" and that "the Company [wa]s also continuing to assess the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and appropriate remediation steps." The Company also estimated that "[t]he total amount of the reduction to accounts payable and purchased transportation costs related to this issue that was recorded during these periods is $77 million."
This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline roughly 18%, from $51.33 per share at close on February 5, 2026, to $41.96 per share at close on February 6, 2026.
On May 12, 2026, Hub Group announced that it had "identified certain transactions that were prematurely or incorrectly recognized or not adequately supported," causing its 2023 and 2024 annual reports filed with the SEC to be "materially misstated," such that they "should no longer be relied upon." The Company did not quantify the expected misstatement, although it "expect[ed] to conclude that it did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023."
This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline a further 13%, from $41.86 per share at close on May 11, 2026, to $36.62 per share at close on May 12, 2026.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Hub Group’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Hub Group class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/HUBG or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Hub Group Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Hub Group securities fraud lawsuit about?
The lawsuit alleges Hub Group made misleading statements about revenue recognition, transportation costs, accounts payable, internal controls, and financial reporting, causing multiple financial statements to contain material accounting misstatements.
Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Hub Group (NASDAQ: HUBG) securities between April 28, 2023 and May 11, 2026 may be eligible to participate if they suffered losses related to the alleged misconduct.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?
A lead plaintiff represents the proposed class and helps oversee the litigation. Eligible investors must file a motion with the court by August 28, 2026. Investors can share in any recovery without serving as lead plaintiff.
What should investors do if they purchased Hub Group stock during the Class Period?
Investors should review their trading records, preserve relevant documents, and evaluate their legal rights. Those who suffered losses may wish to consult counsel regarding participation in the lawsuit or seeking lead plaintiff status before the deadline.
Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?
Faruqi & Faruqi has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for clients. The firm can evaluate your potential claims and explain your legal options at no upfront cost.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT) between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 17, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Commvault securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Commvault class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/commvault-systems-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 17, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Commvault's ARR growth environment; pertinently, Commvault knew or recklessly disregarded that its ARR growth guidance failed to properly factor in crucial variables, such as the type of sale. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Commvault class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/commvault-systems-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303858
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Commvault To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Commvault between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Commvault Systems, Inc. (“Commvault” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: CVLT) and reminds investors of the July 17, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
Defendants provided investors with material information pertaining to Commvault’s projected ARR growth for fiscal year 2026. Defendants’ statements included, among other things, misleading guidance and projections related to the Company’s new net ARR growth. Defendants provided these overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Commvault’s ARR growth environment; pertinently, Commvault knew or recklessly disregarded that the Company’s ARR growth guidance failed to properly factor in crucial variables, such as the type of sale. Such statements absent these material facts caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase Commvault’s securities at artificially inflated prices.
On January 27, 2026, Commvault reported financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 ended December 31, 2025, including "40% growth in SaaS ARR to $364 million," as noted by the Company's Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO") during the earnings call to discuss these results. Additionally, the CAO said "60% of our deals actually closed in the last few weeks of the quarter." According to Bloomberg Intelligence, "SaaS ARR growth of 40% represents a meaningful deceleration from 56%" reported for the second quarter fiscal 2026.
Following this news, Commvault stock declined over 31% on January 27, 2026.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Commvault’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Commvault class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/CVLT or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Commvault Systems Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Commvault Systems securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Commvault Systems securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by providing materially misleading guidance and projections related to the Company's annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth while concealing that its ARR growth guidance failed to properly account for crucial variables — such as the type of sale — that significantly affected the Company's true growth trajectory. As the truth emerged on January 27, 2026, when Commvault reported Q3 fiscal 2026 results showing SaaS ARR growth of only 40% — a meaningful deceleration from 56% in the prior quarter — CVLT's stock price fell over 31% in a single day, causing significant losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Commvault Systems class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Commvault Systems (CVLT) stock between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Commvault securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Commvault employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Commvault Systems lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Commvault Systems class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Commvault investor who purchased CVLT stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 17, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Commvault Systems stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Commvault Systems (CVLT) stock between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Commvault Systems securities class action is July 17, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/CVLT for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
Shares of Bloom Energy (BE 6.47%) are up more than 250% so far this year. That quick rise may make some investors cautious, but there are plenty of solid reasons for the stock's ascendance. The company is at the nexus of renewable energy and artificial intelligence (AI), as its fuel cell energy solutions are increasingly used by hyperscalers to address bottlenecks in powering new data centers.
Are there risks to the stock? Most definitely. It trades at more than 140 times forward earnings, as investors have largely priced in its backlog. Even so, here are three reasons why Bloom Energy is worth buying -- and why the stock should continue to generously reward investors.
Image source: Getty Images.
Bloom's solid oxide fuel cells can be deployed quickly Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and Oracle are spending billions on next-generation AI data centers, but traditional electrical grids are severely bottlenecked. Expanding a localized grid or waiting on a nuclear plant can take years.
Bloom's solid oxide fuel cells generate on-site electricity and can be deployed and operational in as little as 90 days. By bypassing traditional power grids, tech companies ensure their high-dollar AI chips don't sit idle waiting for power.
These fuel cells use renewable natural gas, biogas, or hydrogen, converting it to electricity without combustion and with minimal carbon dioxide emissions.
Today's Change
(
-6.47
%) $
-18.73
Current Price
$
270.77
It has a huge backlog with big tech Bloom's growth is no longer a speculative story; it is backed by concrete, massive commercial contracts. As of the end of 2025, the company said it had a backlog of $20 billion, including a product backlog of $6 billion.
In April, Bloom expanded its agreement with Oracle to support up to 2.8 gigawatts (GW) of fuel cell capacity. This includes Project Jupiter, a massive, multigigawatt AI data center campus in New Mexico that runs entirely on Bloom fuel cells rather than traditional gas turbines or diesel generators.
In May, Bloom secured a 328-megawatt (MW) deployment deal with AI infrastructure company Nebius, providing deep multiyear visibility for revenue generation.
It has reached a financial turning point Historically, fuel cell companies have struggled to turn a profit despite rising revenue. Bloom is actively breaking out of that mold, showcasing real operating leverage. In its first-quarter earnings release, Bloom reported a record $751.1 million in revenue, a massive 130.4% year-over-year increase.
Driven by manufacturing-scale benefits, its gross margin expanded beyond 30%, allowing the company to report net income of $70.6 million, up from a loss of $19.1 million in the first quarter of 2025. Earnings per share (EPS) were $0.23, compared to an EPS loss of $0.10 in the same quarter a year ago, while adjusted EPS was $0.44.
The earnings were a surprise to some analysts, who had predicted revenue of $539.94 and adjusted EPS of $0.12. The numbers were strong enough to prompt management to raise its full-year revenue guidance to $3.4 billion to $3.8 billion, an increase of 80% at the midpoint, and to raise adjusted EPS to between $1.85 and $2.25, up 170% at the midpoint.
Things to look out for Bloom has a few issues, but they're mostly good concerns. The company will have to spend to double factory capacity from 1 gigawatt to 2 gigawatts by the end of 2026. It also faces competition from Plug Power and FuelCell Energy.
The premium attached to Bloom Energy is massive and introduces considerable valuation risk, but it is supported by triple-digit revenue growth and positive cash generation, whereas Plug Power is an improving turnaround play with tight cash constraints, and FuelCell Energy remains trapped in a pattern of shrinking revenue and widening losses.
In the long run, given the push for renewable energy and the way AI is driving the need for more data centers, Bloom is in a good spot to benefit from long-term trends.
First Internet Bancorp is restoring net interest margins, with management guiding for sequential quarterly improvement through year-end. Loan loss provisions are expected to decrease in H2, supporting a projected EPS increase of over 100% versus H1 and targeting $4+ EPS from next year. I maintain a "Buy" rating on INBK common shares due to the improving margin and earnings outlook, despite having sold my position for liquidity reasons.
Austal (ASB) is positioned for robust growth, anchored by multi-decade U.S., Australian, and AUKUS naval shipbuilding programs. Despite recent share price declines and profit-taking, ASB's current valuation fails to reflect its long-term order visibility and expansion opportunities. I apply an 11.4x EV/EBITDA multiple, yielding a conservative $5.75 price target and nearly 100% upside versus current levels.
SAN DIEGO, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE: BTU) common stock between October 14, 2024 and May 4, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), have until August 24, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit. Captioned McGeachy v. Peabody Energy Corporation, No. 26-cv-01020 (E.D. Mo.), the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit charges Peabody Energy as well as certain of Peabody Energy’s top current and former executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:
You can also contact attorneys Ken Dolitsky or Michael Albert of Robbins Geller by calling 800/851-7783 or via e-mail at [email protected].
CASE ALLEGATIONS: Peabody Energy engages in the production of metallurgical and thermal coal.
The Peabody Energy class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to Peabody Energy’s Centurion mine ramp-up and anticipated growth; and (ii) there was a multitude of issues causing delays to the Centurion mine ramp-up and the return to full longwall production dates.
On March 30, 2026, Peabody Energy issued a press release allegedly lowering guidance pertaining to Centurion mine’s expected first quarter 2026 output by 450,000 tons ahead of Peabody Energy’s full earnings release. On this news, the price of Peabody Energy stock fell nearly 10%, according to the complaint.
Then, on May 5, 2026, Peabody Energy issued a press release allegedly disclosing Peabody Energy’s failure to ramp-up Centurion by the long-awaited March 2026 deadline and that Peabody Energy was cutting guidance related to full year met segment volumes to reflect the increased cost and substantial volume decrease. On this news, the price of Peabody Energy stock fell nearly 6%, according to the complaint.
THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired Peabody Energy common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Peabody Energy class action lawsuit.
ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world’s leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation. Our Firm ranked #1 on the most recent ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 Report, recovering more than $916 million for investors in 2025. This marks our fourth #1 ranking in the past five years. And in those five years alone, Robbins Geller recovered $8.4 billion for investors – $3.4 billion more than any other law firm. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs’ firms in the world, and the Firm’s attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
52-Week Range$127.96▼
$247.80Dividend Yield0.64%
P/E Ratio50.79
Price Target$237.80
Regal Rexnord NYSE: RRX has spent decades making motors and power-transmission components for factories.
It still does. But it also makes automation and motion-control components for data centers. And its stock is up about 50% this year as orders flood in.
Get Regal Rexnord alerts:
Analysts rate the company a Moderate Buy by consensus, with most suggesting a Buy.
But a rich multiple, rising short interest, and leadership transition do not make this recent winner necessarily low-risk.
AI Data Centers Are Driving DemandAt its core, Regal Rexnord is a maker of industrial powertrain systems, motion control technology, and power management solutions. In other words, it makes the mechanical and electrical components that move, control, and regulate energy inside machines.
For years, its products went into factories, HVAC systems, agricultural equipment, and commercial infrastructure. More recently, though, cloud companies and AI developers began building data centers at a breakneck pace, and they needed the precision power components that Regal Rexnord specializes in.
Cooling systems require motion control. Power distribution requires conversion technology. The infrastructure behind an AI data center is, at its core, an industrial engineering problem, and Regal Rexnord is one of the companies solving it.
Strong Orders Point to Sustained GrowthThe first quarter of 2026 provided the evidence. The company reported sales of $1.48 billion, up 4.3% year-over-year, and above analysts’ expectations. GAAP net income rose 11.8% to $64.3 million from $57.5 million in the prior year. Adjusted diluted earnings per share climbed to $2.17 from $2.15, also above what analysts expected.
While those top figures were solid, the number that attracted the most attention was found in the order data. Daily orders rose 8.5% from the prior year, and backlog grew 6.7% quarter-to-quarter at the enterprise level.
In particular, it was Regal Rexnord's Automation and Motion Control (AMC) segment where orders tied to data-center applications surged. Total AMC segment orders were up more than 34% compared with the prior year, and even when data-center demand is removed, the remaining AMC orders still grew 28%. Overall, net sales for the unit were $457.1 million, up 15.3% from the year-earlier period.
The company also said it expects orders to continue increasing. “We’re still very, very bullish,” the company’s CEO said in the quarterly conference call with analysts. “This is a market where we’re nicely positioned.”
Strong Results Extend Beyond AI Data CentersThe details are telling, as the data center buildout powers serious demand while the rest of the business is also strengthening, with aerospace, defense, and medical applications all contributing.
The company’s industrial powertrain solutions saw net sales rise 5.8% to $648.2 million. Its power efficiency solutions operations, hurt by a weakness in residential HVAC sales, saw a decrease of 8.6% to $373.8 million.
Management responded by raising its full-year 2026 sales growth expectation to about 4.5%, an increase of roughly 150 basis points from the prior outlook. Its adjusted diluted earnings per share guidance range of $10.20 to $11 for the year stayed level, compared with $9.65 for 2025.
Wall Street Sees Limited Upside After Big RallyThe stock's performance this year reflects how dramatically the market's perception of Regal Rexnord has shifted.
Currently trading at about $212 per share, shares are up about 51% from $140.48 at the start of this year.
The 10 analysts who follow the stock have a consensus rating of a Moderate Buy, though the 12-month price target they collectively predict is $237.80, just 310% higher than recent trading prices. With a quarterly dividend of just 35 cents and a dividend yield below 1%, the stock's potential for appreciation is the key driver.
Seven of the analysts rate the stock a Buy, while three have tagged it a Hold. The highest price target is $265 per share, and the lowest is $160.
Short interest is also something to watch. As of the middle of June, the company had a short interest of 3.35 million shares sold short, about 5% of the outstanding float. That’s more than twice the level from the middle of March.
Margins and New Leadership Pose RisksThe caution that is evident in some of these numbers is not unsupported.
Regal Rexnord competes in markets where Rockwell Automation NYSE: ROK, Eaton NYSE: ETN, and Emerson Electric NYSE: EMR are also pursuing electrification and digital-infrastructure spending. And though the company has attractive specialties and technological advantages, industrial demand can soften quickly.
Despite beating expectations with revenue and earnings, the company also spooked the market as its earnings report showed its margin on adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) dropped to 20.6% from 21.8% in the year-earlier period. With tariffs and higher material costs, that margin could also be hit further.
Leadership transition adds another variable. Earlier this year, the company announced it had appointed a new CEO. A new president of the company’s Industrial Powertrain Solutions has also been named.
A New Industrial Growth Story Is EmergingRegal Rexnord is not an easy call. The surge in stock price followed by an influx of short sellers makes it clear there are two ways to view the company.
For investors, it’s a genuinely interesting opportunity in the industrial sector. The company is not a traditional value stock, nor is it a dividend stock. It is a company that is possibly undergoing a real transformation from a legacy industrial company to an AI-boosted supplier. If the infrastructure buildout is just getting started, Regal Rexnord's position, assuming new management can execute, could be in the formative stages.
A serious dip in the sector, though, could see its growth unfulfilled. Watch for margins and order flow when it reports its next quarter.
Regardless of what happens, Regal Rexnord is no longer easy to ignore.
Should You Invest $1,000 in Regal Rexnord Right Now?Before you consider Regal Rexnord, you'll want to hear this.
MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and Regal Rexnord wasn't on the list.
While Regal Rexnord currently has a Moderate Buy rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.
View The Five Stocks Here
The AI boom is creating opportunities across semiconductors, cloud computing, enterprise software, infrastructure, cybersecurity, and automation.
Inside this report, you’ll find 10 companies positioned to benefit as artificial intelligence moves from hype to real-world deployment and becomes a core growth driver for corporate America.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Thirty thousand dollars a year sounds simple: $2,500 a month to help cover property taxes, health insurance premiums, groceries, and other bills without leaning harder on Social Security. The harder question is what it takes to generate that income. With the 10-year Treasury recently near 4.4% and the Core PCE price index still rising, the yield you choose does more than set today’s paycheck. It also shapes how much inflation protection, growth potential, and principal risk you accept.
The Conservative Tier: Roughly $857,000 at 3.5% At a 3.5% yield, replacing $30,000 of annual income takes about $857,000 of capital. That is the price of starting with lower yield and more emphasis on dividend growth. This tier is built from dividend-growth equities, broad market dividend funds, and regulated utilities like NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE), whose $0.6232 quarterly dividend works out to about $2.49 annually.
That growth is the entire point. NextEra has targeted at least 8% compound annual adjusted EPS growth through 2032, while its dividend plan calls for about 10% annual growth through 2026 and 6% annual growth from year-end 2026 through 2028. The tradeoff is the upfront capital requirement, which puts this tier out of reach for many households.
The Moderate Tier: About $500,000 at 6% At 6%, the capital requirement drops to roughly $500,000. This is the range of net-lease REITs, midstream MLPs, preferred shares, and higher-dividend equity funds, though the income is usually less tax-efficient and less predictable than a Treasury coupon.
Realty Income (NYSE: O) anchors the category with a monthly dividend of $0.271 per share, or $3.252 annually. At a recent share price near $63, that works out to a yield a little above 5.1%. Realty Income also reported first-quarter 2026 AFFO per share of $1.13, up 6.6% from a year earlier.
Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) pays a $0.55 quarterly distribution, or $2.20 annually, which put its recent yield near 6.0%. The catch is K-1 tax reporting. Partnership income can also create unrelated business taxable income inside an IRA, and the IRS generally requires Form 990-T when an exempt organization has $1,000 or more of gross unrelated business income.
This tier may sacrifice some dividend growth and inflation protection. That is the cost of starting with a higher payout: more income today, but less room for the payout to compound if rent growth, financing costs, commodity exposure, or credit conditions move against the business.
The Aggressive Tier: Near $300,000 at 10% At 10%, the math gets seductive. Around $300,000 generates the full $30,000 before taxes. This is the home of business development companies, mortgage REITs, and high-yield bond funds, where the payout is high because the underlying risks are high, too.
Main Street Capital (NYSE: MAIN) recently paid a regular monthly dividend of $0.26 and declared $0.265 monthly dividends for July through September 2026, along with a $0.30 supplemental dividend payable in June. That puts its regular yield near 6.2%, while recurring $0.30 quarterly supplementals would lift the cash yield to roughly 8.5%, not double digits. Ares Capital (NASDAQ: ARCC) pays a $0.48 quarterly dividend, or $1.92 annually, for a recent yield near 10.6%.
Stable is the key word, not guaranteed. Ares Capital’s NAV slipped from $19.94 at December 31, 2025, to $19.59 at March 31, 2026, and its Core EPS of $0.47 was just below the $0.48 quarterly dividend. The income is real. So is the risk that credit losses, funding costs, or lower portfolio yields pressure the payout or the share price.
The Insight Hiding in the Math A 3.5% yield growing 8% a year doubles income in about nine years. But that is a math example, not a promise. A lower-yield dividend-growth portfolio can become more powerful over time if earnings and dividends compound. A 10% portfolio can produce more income upfront, but the payout may stagnate or fall if credit losses, leverage, or refinancing costs hit the underlying holdings.
Income Moves to Consider Pin down your real spending number first. The headline $30,000 may overstate or understate what you need once Social Security, a paid-off mortgage, Medicare premiums, taxes, and lower work-related costs are factored in.
Then compare total return and income growth together, not yield alone.
Finally, match the tax wrapper to the asset: qualified dividends, REIT dividends, BDC income, and MLP distributions can land very differently on a tax return.
The Yield Is Only the Starting Point A $2,500 monthly income target is not just a yield problem. It is a tradeoff among capital, taxes, inflation, and risk. Lower-yield investments usually demand more money upfront, but they may give income more room to grow. Higher-yield investments can close the gap faster, but they deserve a harder look at dividend coverage, leverage, credit exposure, and how the income will be taxed.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 5, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of AeroVironment, Inc. (NASDAQ: AVAV) between June 25, 2025 and March 10, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important July 27, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased AeroVironment securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the AeroVironment class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/aerovironment-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 27, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) AeroVironment understated the likelihood that it would imminently face competition from other vendors for the work it performed in connection with the U.S. Space Force's Satellite Communication Augmentation Resources ("SCAR") program and the U.S. Space Force's ongoing efforts to modernize the Satellite Control Network ("SCN"); (2) accordingly, defendants overstated AeroVironment's business and financial prospects; and (3) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the AeroVironment class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/aerovironment-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/303849
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Graphic Packaging To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options
If you purchased or acquired securities in Graphic Packaging between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
[You may also click here for additional information]
NEW YORK, July 05, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Graphic Packaging Holding Company (“Graphic Packaging” or the “Company”) (NYSE: GPK) and reminds investors of the July 6, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.
Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.
As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Graphic Packaging was experiencing, inter alia, significant inventory management issues, as well as significantly reduced demand and volumes and increased costs; (2) Defendants downplayed the true scope and severity of the foregoing issues, which were likely to, and did, have a material negative impact on the Company’s business and financial results; (3) Defendants likewise overstated the strength and sustainability of the Company’s business model and operations, as well as its ability to weather ongoing macroeconomic headwinds; (4) accordingly, the Company’s previously issued FY 2025 financial guidance was unreliable and/or unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Graphic Packaging’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.
To learn more about the Graphic Packaging class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/GPK or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Graphic Packaging Holding Company Securities Class Action Lawsuit:
What is the Graphic Packaging securities fraud lawsuit about?
The Graphic Packaging securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Graphic Packaging Holding Company (NYSE: GPK) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by concealing significant inventory management issues, reduced demand and volumes, and increased costs, while overstating the strength and sustainability of the Company's business model and issuing unreliable financial guidance. As the truth emerged through a series of disclosures — including a May 1, 2025 Q1 earnings miss and sweeping downward revision to FY 2025 guidance, a December 8, 2025 announcement of accelerated inventory reductions, further guidance cuts, and the CEO's departure, and a February 3, 2026 Q4 earnings miss accompanied by a projected meaningful decline in 2026 adjusted EBITDA and the launch of a comprehensive business review — GPK's stock price fell sharply across each disclosure, causing significant cumulative losses for investors.
Who may be eligible to participate in the Graphic Packaging class action lawsuit?
Investors who purchased or acquired Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) stock between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Graphic Packaging securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Graphic Packaging employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.
What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Graphic Packaging lawsuit?
A lead plaintiff in the Graphic Packaging class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Graphic Packaging investor who purchased GPK stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 6, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.
What should investors do if they purchased Graphic Packaging stock during the Class Period?
Investors who purchased Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) stock between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Graphic Packaging securities class action is July 6, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/GPK for more information.
Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7f60c456-51b6-4096-a862-d5d3beda6cc5
