Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

The market expects Steel Dynamics (STLD - Free Report) to deliver a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when it reports results for the quarter ended June 2026. This widely-known consensus outlook is important in assessing the company's earnings picture, but a powerful factor that might influence its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates.

The earnings report, which is expected to be released on July 20, might help the stock move higher if these key numbers are better than expectations. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower.

While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise.

Zacks Consensus EstimateThis steel producer and metals recycler is expected to post quarterly earnings of $3.66 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +82.1%.

Revenues are expected to be $5.46 billion, up 19.5% from the year-ago quarter.

Estimate Revisions TrendThe consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 7.3% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period.

Investors should keep in mind that an aggregate change may not always reflect the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts.

Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

Earnings WhisperEstimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction).

The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier.

Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only.

A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP.

Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell).

How Have the Numbers Shaped Up for Steel Dynamics?For Steel Dynamics, the Most Accurate Estimate is lower than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bearish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of -1.00%.

On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3.

So, this combination makes it difficult to conclusively predict that Steel Dynamics will beat the consensus EPS estimate.

Does Earnings Surprise History Hold Any Clue?Analysts often consider to what extent a company has been able to match consensus estimates in the past while calculating their estimates for its future earnings. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number.

For the last reported quarter, it was expected that Steel Dynamics would post earnings of $2.79 per share when it actually produced earnings of $2.78, delivering a surprise of -0.36%.

Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates two times.

Bottom LineAn earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss.

That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.

Steel Dynamics doesn't appear a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release.

Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar.

© 3DSculptor / iStock via Getty Images

Shares of SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) are down 5% to $138.58 in early Monday trading, a fresh record low that sits below the $150 debut price and well off the $225 peak on June 16. The slide extends a bruising stretch for the stock, which had already dropped 10% over the prior week.

Rocket Lab (NASDAQ:RKLB | RKLB Price Prediction) is off 4% to $78.10, and AST SpaceMobile (NASDAQ:ASTS) is down 5% to $69.82. The Procure Space ETF (NYSEARCA:UFO), the sector’s cleanest proxy, is down 2% to $46.

The backdrop is risk-off market sentiment. The Strait of Hormuz conflict has lifted the WTI crude oil price and pushed the NASDAQ 100 down 1.09%, pressuring high-beta, pre-profit names first. WTI crude oil spiked 4.41% over the past 24 hours to $74.56 per barrel.

China Rocket Milestone Rattles the SpaceX Trade Bernstein named China SpaceX’s “leading competitor” after China’s Long March 10B landed a reusable first-stage booster on July 10, the country’s first orbital-class booster recovery using a sea-based net-and-hook platform. That milestone punctures the narrative that reusability is a uniquely American moat.

Bernstein maintained an Outperform rating and a $239 price target, arguing SpaceX still leads by a wide margin with about 165 launches last year and nearly a decade of Falcon 9 reuse, while China has one landing and has not demonstrated booster reuse. The Street average SPCX stock price target sits near $242, and Raymond James carries a high $800 target.

The bear case is the valuation debate. SpaceX shares now trade below their IPO price, and critics call the multiple speculative given a a large market cap against a private operating business investors cannot model directly. The bull case leans on launch cadence dominance, Starlink cash flow, and scarcity value in a listed vehicle.

Rocket Lab Slides Despite a Space Force Win Rocket Lab stock is falling despite positive news for the company, which underscores the macro nature of today’s move. The company announced full mission success on the U.S. Space Force VICTUS HAZE responsive-space demo, launching within 16 hours 42 minutes of notice, a record. Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) carries a Buy rating and a $115 target following its latest acquisition plan.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Rocket Lab didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The fundamentals remain firm. Rocket Lab’s recent quarterly revenue showed strong year-over-year growth, and backlog remains substantial. Yet, Rocket Lab shares have still shed 24% over the past month as the sector de-rated.

AST SpaceMobile Pulled Along on Sector Rotation AST SpaceMobile stock is also lower despite the company’s own good news. The company received a New Zealand gateway license effective today and has BlueBird 11 at Cape Canaveral ahead of an August launch. It is targeting 45 satellites by year-end with agreements covering roughly 60 mobile operators.

The stock’s beta cuts both ways. ASTS shares are still up 55% over the past year, but they have given back 13% in the past week as oil-driven risk aversion hits speculative growth names.

What to Watch The read-through is that SpaceX stock is leading the drop on the China competition scare and valuation fatigue, while Rocket Lab and AST SpaceMobile stocks are dropping in sympathy despite constructive company-specific news. That reflects sector rotation rather than a fundamentals downgrade.

For SpaceX, the cautious approach is to limit one’s position sizing. The stock is a fresh IPO trading below issue, and the analyst target dispersion between $242 and $800 reflects genuine uncertainty about how to price a launch monopoly against an awakening Chinese rival.

Investors can watch for whether crude retreats further, whether SPCX stock defends its debut price, and whether Bernstein or peers revisit their view on SpaceX after the Long March data. For now, the UFO ETF is a simple gauge of whether today’s selloff broadens or fades into the close.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Rocket Lab didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

© Don Peek / U.S. Air Force

When The War Trade Didn’t Work The reflex is familiar. Shooting starts, defense stocks rip. That script broke this year. The Iran conflict began Saturday, February 28, 2026, so the first trading day for a fresh position was Monday, March 2, 2026. An investor who bought Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT | LMT Price Prediction) that morning has watched the position bleed lower, even as the conflict dragged on and munitions demand stayed loud.

The business itself did not go quiet. Lockheed posted a record $194B backlog exiting 2025, ramped F-35 deliveries, and signed a seven-year PAC-3 framework. CEO Jim Taiclet talked up F-35, F-22, and Black Hawk performance during Operation Absolute Resolve. Then a soft Q1 2026 report on April 23 (EPS of $6.44, missing the $6.70 expectation, operating cash flow crashing to $220M from $1.41B) reset the mood, and the stock never regained footing.

Your $10,000 Is Underwater Here is how the trade actually performed, using adjusted closes.

Iran Conflict Window (March 2, 2026 to July 10, 2026)

Initial Investment: $10,000 LMT Start Price: $672.21 LMT End Price: $523.22 Total Return: -22.16% (a loss) Peer check: Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) -29.42%, L3Harris (NYSE:LHX) -22.60%, iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (NYSEARCA:ITA) -4.47%, General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) +3.75% For the longer-horizon context on LMT alone:

1-Year Return: +15.75% 5-Year Return: +56.27% 10-Year Return: +167.81% A $10,000 stake placed on March 2 is now worth well under $8,000, and there was no late rescue. LMT fell another 4.16% in the week ending July 10. Two $3.45 dividend payments softened the sting slightly, but not meaningfully. I will not pretend to know exactly why the stock fell while missiles were flying. What is clear is that Northrop and L3Harris did worse, so this looks more like a sector reset than a Lockheed-specific unraveling.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Lockheed Martin didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Would I Put New Money In Today? I would buy Lockheed here if I believe the FY26 guide holds ($77.5B to $80.0B revenue, EPS $29.35 to $30.25, FCF $6.5B to $6.8B), the Golden Dome and PAC-3 ramps convert backlog into cash, and the forward P/E of 17 against a $615.74 analyst target proves the recent drawdown was an overreaction.

I would avoid it if fixed-price program charges keep resurfacing (the Q2 2025 $1.6B in reach-forward losses is still fresh), if working capital keeps whipsawing free cash flow, and if defense budget politics get messy heading into FY27 appropriations.

My lean: cautiously constructive, but not in a rush. The dividend keeps paying, the backlog is real, and the peer group already priced in a lot of pain. I want one clean quarter of guidance-in-line execution before I add. Anyone catching this knife on the Iran headline learned an expensive lesson: geopolitics is not a stock thesis.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Lockheed Martin didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

© Public Domain / Wikimedia Commons

Jerry McGinn, who runs the Center for the Industrial Base at CSIS, went on CNBC with a number that will define the defense trade for the rest of the year. Roughly $50 billion in deal announcements have come out of the NATO summit in recent days, as allies convert last year’s pledge to reach 5% of GDP defense spending by 2030 into actual purchase orders. Canada, Germany, and Norway are lining up behind U.S. primes. McGinn’s message to investors was blunt about what to trust and what to discount.

The $50 Billion in Fresh Deals The headline transaction is NATO buying the Triton unmanned surveillance aircraft from Northrop Grumman, alongside deals featuring European firms like Saab on ISR systems (Saab trades in Stockholm, not on a U.S. exchange, so American investors get the theme through the primes). Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC | NOC Price Prediction) already booked $400 million in Triton awards in Q1 and is expanding B-21 production capacity with the Air Force. Its backlog stands at $95.6 billion, and management reaffirmed FY26 sales of $43.5 to $44.0 billion.

The stock is down 7.5% year to date, which tells you the market has not fully priced the NATO order book. Analyst consensus target is $689.33, against a current price near $541, with shares trading at a forward P/E of 19x.

The Commitment-to-Contract Gap Investors Have to Watch McGinn’s investor test is the whole ballgame. “What investors need to be looking at is how does this translate into actual real business contracts?” He flagged three hurdles. U.S. congressional approval comes first, then European parliamentary approval, then actual contracting. Pledges are cheap. Contracts show up in backlog.

Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) is the clearest example of pledge-to-paper conversion. In its Q1 filing, CEO Jim Taiclet said the company signed framework agreements for advanced Patriot Missile, THAAD, and PrSM that will support raising production rates to 3 to 4 times current levels. That is a multi-year purchase commitment. Lockheed’s backlog closed 2025 at a record $194 billion. General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) shows the same conversion, with a consolidated Q1 book-to-bill of 2-to-1 and total estimated contract value climbing to $188.4 billion from $178.9 billion. GD shares are up 9.75% YTD and 23% over the past year, so much of the good news is already in.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Lockheed Martin didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

New Money Spigots and Where Munitions Cash Lands The financing side is where things get interesting. McGinn pointed to Canadian Prime Minister Carney’s newly announced defense bank and the expanded U.S. loan authority as tools designed to attract private capital to the industrial base. The Pentagon’s FY2027 request backs this up with real dollars. The DoW budget book earmarks $20.2 billion for the Defense Credit Account and over $100 billion in Defense Industrial Base investments, including $72.3 billion for Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment and Defense Production Act Title III. That is munitions and hypersonics money.

Which brings you to Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (NASDAQ:KTOS), the pure-play beneficiary. CEO Eric DeMarco told investors on the Q1 call that “Fiscal 2027 National Security spend is currently projected to be $1.5 trillion, an approximate $400 billion increase above Fiscal Year 2026” and that the Department plans to spend the entire $156 billion Reconciliation Bill defense funding in fiscal 2026, covering Kratos’ Valkyrie CCA, solid rocket motors, and hypersonics.

Kratos beat Q1 EPS estimates by 23%, raised FY26 revenue guidance to $1.70-$1.76 billion, and announced a 100,000-square-foot expansion in Oklahoma City to boost Valkyrie production. The catch is valuation. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 62x and is down 39% YTD from its highs.

McGinn’s framework is the right one. Watch backlogs. Congressional and parliamentary votes come first, then contracts, then revenue. That sequence decides whether $50 billion of headlines becomes real EPS.

Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Lockheed Martin didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Coursera (COUR - Free Report) closed the last trading session at $5.71, gaining 6.9% over the past four weeks, but there could be plenty of upside left in the stock if short-term price targets set by Wall Street analysts are any guide. The mean price target of $7.91 indicates a 38.5% upside potential.

The mean estimate comprises 11 short-term price targets with a standard deviation of $1.5. While the lowest estimate of $5.50 indicates a 3.7% decline from the current price level, the most optimistic analyst expects the stock to surge 75.1% to reach $10.00. It's very important to note the standard deviation here, as it helps understand the variability of the estimates. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the agreement among analysts.

While the consensus price target is a much-coveted metric for investors, solely banking on this metric to make an investment decision may not be wise at all. That's because the ability and unbiasedness of analysts in setting price targets have long been questionable.

However, an impressive consensus price target is not the only factor that indicates a potential upside in COUR. This view is strengthened by the agreement among analysts that the company will report better earnings than what they estimated earlier. Though a positive trend in earnings estimate revisions doesn't give any idea as to how much the stock could surge, it has proven effective in predicting an upside.

Price, Consensus and EPS Surprise

Here's What You May Not Know About Analysts' Price TargetsAccording to researchers at several universities across the globe, a price target is one of many pieces of information about a stock that misleads investors far more often than it guides. In fact, empirical research shows that price targets set by several analysts, irrespective of the extent of agreement, rarely indicate where the price of a stock could actually be heading.

While Wall Street analysts have deep knowledge of a company's fundamentals and the sensitivity of its business to economic and industry issues, many of them tend to set overly optimistic price targets. Are you wondering why?

They usually do that to drum up interest in shares of companies that their firms either have existing business relationships with or are looking to be associated with. In other words, business incentives of firms covering a stock often result in inflated price targets set by analysts.

However, a tight clustering of price targets, which is represented by a low standard deviation, indicates that analysts have a high degree of agreement about the direction and magnitude of a stock's price movement. While that doesn't necessarily mean the stock will hit the average price target, it could be a good starting point for further research aimed at identifying the potential fundamental driving forces.

That said, while investors should not entirely ignore price targets, making an investment decision solely based on them could lead to disappointing ROI. So, price targets should always be treated with a high degree of skepticism.

Why COUR Could Witness a Solid UpsideThere has been increasing optimism among analysts lately about the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by strong agreement among them in revising EPS estimates higher. And that could be a legitimate reason to expect an upside in the stock. After all, empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has increased 181.5%, as four estimates have moved higher compared to no negative revision.

Moreover, COUR currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), which means it is in the top 20% of more than 4,000 stocks that we rank based on four factors related to earnings estimates. Given an impressive externally-audited track record, this is a more conclusive indication of the stock's potential upside in the near term. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

Therefore, while the consensus price target may not be a reliable indicator of how much COUR could gain, the direction of price movement it implies does appear to be a good guide.

Lumentum Holdings Inc. ("Lumentum") today announced that it will release its fiscal fourth quarter and full year 2026 financial results on Tuesday, August 11, 2

Transaction utilizes pledge of equity structure in place of traditional property mortgages, enabling portfolio-level financing across 99 properties in 27 statesNew financing increases total debt commitments across Alterra’s fully discretionary IOS funds to more than $2 billionFacility delivers faster execution, lower transaction costs, and non-recourse, scalable capital for continued growth across Alterra’s IOS platform

The financing was secured by a portfolio of 99 IOS properties totaling 551 usable acres and nearly 2.1 million square feet of accompanying warehouse space. (Credit: Alterra IOS) 

PHILADELPHIA, July 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alterra IOS (“Alterra”), a prominent player in the industrial outdoor storage (“IOS”) sector that has acquired more than 495 sites nationwide, today announced the successful closing of a $400 million refinancing led by Truist Financial Corp. (NYSE: TFC) and KeyBank (NYSE: KEY), supporting the continued expansion of its growing industrial outdoor storage platform.

Secured by a portfolio of 99 IOS properties spanning 27 states, the financing was executed utilizing an equity pledge framework in place of traditional asset-level mortgages. The structure enables streamlined execution and portfolio-level underwriting. Of the total financing, Truist provided $225 million as Administrative Agent, Joint Lead Arranger and Active Bookrunner, and KeyBank National Association committed $175 million as Syndication Agent, Joint Lead Arranger and Active Bookrunner.

“This transaction reflects a shift toward more scalable, platform-based financing solutions in real estate,” said Scott Whittle, Chief Financial Officer at Alterra IOS. “For portfolios like IOS, which consist of a high volume of assets, traditional mortgage structures can be time- and cost-intensive. An equity pledge structure allows us to operate more efficiently by reducing legal and administrative burden, accelerating execution and preserving flexibility as we continue to grow the platform.”

“Structures like this are becoming more relevant as institutional capital seeks efficient ways to access fragmented sectors at scale,” said Kate Mooney, Alterra Senior Associate, Capital Markets. “As IOS portfolios have grown and matured, lenders have developed greater comfort underwriting diversified portfolios rather than individual assets. Equity pledge facilities reflect that evolution and provide both borrowers and lenders with a more practical and efficient financing solution.”

Collectively, the portfolio of 99 IOS properties totals 551 usable acres and nearly 2.1 million square feet of accompanying warehouse space. Each site is located in a major U.S. industrial and logistics corridor in core markets across California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Texas.

This transaction comes on the heels of several significant funding transactions for Alterra, including a $244 million equity-based pledge issued by Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies (BREDs), $103 million in acquisition financing from PGIM (NYSE: PRU); and a $100 million revolving credit facility from Bank of Montreal (NYSE: BMO).

“Industrial outdoor storage has emerged as one of the most compelling segments within industrial real estate,” said Nadia Mahmoud, Managing Director, Real Estate Corporate Banking at Truist. “As the landscape continues to evolve, we’re seeing increasing demand for financing solutions that can match the scale and complexity of this asset class. We’re proud to deliver the flexibility and expertise that clients need to capitalize on this growing market.”

“IOS continues to benefit from durable demand fundamentals and a constrained supply environment, particularly in core logistics corridors,” said Joshua Mayers, Senior Vice President, KeyBank. “Alterra’s operational track record, and this portfolio’s quality, allowed Truist and KeyBank to provide a flexible and creative credit facility structure to support the Company’s continued growth.”

Alterra has raised more than $2 billion in institutional financing across its discretionary ventures, Alterra IOS Venture II ($524 million) and Venture III ($925 million), complementing $1.45 billion in equity raised for its closed-end funds.

Alterra has acquired more than 495 properties across 39 states as of Q2 2026, reinforcing its position as the industry’s leading owner and operator in a historically fragmented and undercapitalized asset class. As a vertically integrated investor, developer and operator of IOS, Alterra’s investment strategy focuses on acquiring prime IOS locations within dense, infill logistics and transportation gateways, ensuring proximity to critical infrastructure and end-users.

About Alterra IOS
Alterra’s industrial real estate platform, Alterra IOS, is dedicated to providing real estate solutions through property acquisition, development, management & leasing for tenants in the heavy industrial & outdoor storage space. Focused on low-building coverage sites with large, stabilized yard space to accommodate an array of uses such as vehicle, material, and equipment storage, Alterra brings an institutional comprehension of the municipal & logistical complexities in securing mission critical real estate in a sector of the U.S. industrial landscape. Over the past ten years, Alterra IOS has created tenant relationships in the transportation & logistics, vehicle storage, equipment rental, infrastructure services, and building materials industries through the acquisition or development of over 480 properties across 39 states as of Q2 2026. The dedicated team of investment, property management, construction, and asset management professionals provide tenants the resources to grow and improve their businesses on a national level.

Alterra IOS Manager is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. This information is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities. Such an offer will only be made by means of a confidential private placement memorandum and related subscription documents. Furthermore, Alterra IOS Venture II and Alterra IOS Venture III are closed to new investors.

Media Contact:
[email protected]

A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ffb692aa-f806-4164-b934-8359f7550377

Key Takeaways SPX Technologies' stock gained 26.1% in a year, outpacing the Construction sector and the S&P 500 Index.SPXC raised its 2026 data center growth outlook to 70% as cooling and air-handling demand accelerated.Segment income rose 22% to $135 million, while margin expanded 100 basis points to 23.9%. SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC - Free Report) has delivered a strong share price performance, reflecting solid execution, resilient demand across its key end markets and growing confidence in its long-term growth strategy. Momentum in its HVAC and Detection & Measurement businesses, accelerating demand for data center cooling solutions and disciplined acquisitions have strengthened the company's growth outlook. SPXC stock has climbed 26.1% over the past year, broadly matching the Zacks Building Products - Air Conditioner and Heating industry’s 27% rise while outperforming the Construction sector’s 14.6% gain and the S&P 500 Index’s 24.2% increase.

The outlook remains encouraging. Management raised its full-year guidance after a stronger-than-expected first quarter of 2026, citing robust execution, sustained demand across key markets and additional data center-related volumes expected in the second half of 2026. Continued investments in manufacturing capacity, product innovation and strategic acquisitions should further strengthen SPX Technologies' competitive position.

SPXC’s 1-Year Price Performance

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Over the past year, SPX Technologies has substantially outperformed several industry peers. While Carrier Global Corporation (CARR - Free Report) and Pentair plc (PNR - Free Report) posted declines of 9.5% and 28.7%, respectively, Trane Technologies plc (TT - Free Report) gained 9.2%.

SPXC's Data Center Strategy Continues to Drive Long-Term GrowthSPX Technologies continues to benefit from one of the strongest structural growth trends in industrial markets: data center infrastructure. Management noted that demand for its cooling systems and custom air-handling solutions remains exceptionally strong, prompting the company to increase its 2026 data center growth outlook from approximately 50% to 70%. SPXC also emphasized that demand continues to accelerate, supported by increasing activity from hyperscale and colocation customers.

To support this opportunity, SPX Technologies is expanding production capacity across multiple facilities. New manufacturing lines at its Tennessee and Kansas plants have already begun production, while the Alabama expansion remains on schedule to add additional assembly and manufacturing capacity through 2027. Management believes these investments, together with strong customer visibility and a diversified customer base, position the company for sustained growth beyond 2026.

SPXC's Operational Execution Continues to Support Profit GrowthSPX Technologies continues to execute well across both operating segments despite ongoing investments in capacity expansion. Consolidated segment income rose 22% year over year to $135 million, while segment margin expanded 100 basis points to 23.9%, supported by higher volumes, a favorable product mix and increased software revenues within Detection & Measurement.

HVAC segment’s income increased 20% to $88.6 million, benefiting from organic growth and acquisition contributions. Segment margin declined 40 basis points to 22.5%, mainly due to planned start-up costs associated with new production capacity. Management expects most of the estimated $8-$9 million in start-up expenses to be incurred during the first half of 2026. As the new facilities ramp up, operating leverage is expected to improve and support stronger profitability over time.

The company's disciplined acquisition strategy also continues to enhance its growth profile. Recent additions such as Thermolec and Crawford's commercial air-handling business expand SPX Technologies' HVAC capabilities, while the divestiture of Crawford United's non-core industrial and transportation businesses sharpens management's focus on higher-growth markets.

SPXC's Financial Strength Supports Future GrowthSPX Technologies maintains a healthy balance sheet that provides ample flexibility to invest in organic growth and pursue strategic acquisitions. The company ended the first quarter with approximately $158 million in cash and a leverage ratio of roughly 0.9x, well below its long-term target range. This financial strength provides significant capacity to pursue additional value-enhancing acquisitions while continuing to invest in manufacturing expansion and innovation.

The company also continues to generate positive operating cash flow while actively reshaping its portfolio. During the quarter, SPX Technologies completed the divestiture of Crawford United's non-core industrial and transportation businesses, allowing management to sharpen its focus on higher-growth HVAC and Detection & Measurement markets. Combined with a robust acquisition pipeline and raised full-year guidance, the balance sheet positions SPXC to continue executing its long-term growth strategy.

Earnings Estimate Revision of SPXC StockSPXC’s earnings outlook has improved over the past 60 days, with the Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2026 rising to $7.98 per share. The consensus estimate for 2027 has remained unchanged over the same period, as shown below. The current projections imply earnings growth of 18.1% in 2026, followed by an additional 12.9% increase in 2027.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

SPXC's earnings growth outlook also compares favorably with its peers. Carrier Global is expected to grow earnings by 7.7% this year, while Pentair and Trane Technologies are projected to deliver growth of 8.7% and 13.6%, respectively.

SPXC Stock Trades at a DiscountSPX Technologies trades at a forward 12-month P/E ratio of 25.77X, below the industry average. The valuation reflects investor confidence in the company's disciplined execution, expanding data center opportunity, resilient demand across key end markets and continued investments in manufacturing capacity, product innovation and strategic acquisitions. These initiatives are expected to support long-term earnings growth.

However, following the stock's strong run, execution remains critical. Delays in ramping new manufacturing capacity, slower-than-expected data center demand, integration challenges related to recent acquisitions or a greater-than-expected impact from tariffs could pressure margins and weigh on investor sentiment.

SPXC P/E Ratio (Forward 12 Months) Vs Industry

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

Among peers, Carrier Global trades at a forward 12-month P/E multiple of 23.27X, while Pentair trades at 13.57X. Trane Technologies carries a higher valuation of 30.06X on the same basis. SPXC therefore trades at a premium to Carrier and Pentair but at a discount to Trane Technologies, placing it within the broader peer valuation range.

Is SPXC Stock Still a Buy After Its Strong Run?SPX Technologies remains well positioned to benefit from structural growth trends across data centers, HVAC and Detection & Measurement markets. The company continues to execute its value creation strategy through capacity expansion, product innovation and disciplined acquisitions, while its raised guidance and robust backlog underscore confidence in long-term growth. These initiatives, combined with resilient demand across key end markets, should support sustained earnings growth over time.

SPXC also maintains financial flexibility to invest in organic expansion and pursue strategic acquisitions. However, risks remain from delays in ramping new manufacturing capacity, slower-than-expected data center demand, acquisition integration challenges and tariff-related pressures. While the stock trades at a discount to the broader peer group, sustained execution will be important to justify its valuation. Encouragingly, rising earnings estimates suggest analysts remain confident in the company's growth prospects.

SPXC stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.

NEW YORK, July 13, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP alerts investors in Hub Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HUBG) of a pending securities class action. Class Period: April 28, 2023 through May 11, 2026. Check if you can recover your investment losses or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at [email protected] | (212) 363-7500.

Hub Group shares lost 14.71 per share in cumulative value across two corrective disclosures, falling 28.6% from the Class Period high of 51.33 on February 5, 2026, to $36.62 on May 12, 2026. The Court has set August 28, 2026, as the deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment.

The February 2026 Market Repricing

On February 5, 2026, Hub Group disclosed that financial statements for the first three quarters of 2025 "should not be relied upon" because of an error that understated purchased transportation costs and accounts payable by an estimated 77 million. The filing states that the market absorbed this information rapidly: HUBG shares fell 18% in a single trading session, dropping9.37 per share to close at $41.96 on February 6, 2026.

The magnitude of the single-day decline reflected the degree to which investors had relied on previously reported cost figures. For seven consecutive quarters, as set forth in the complaint, the Company had attributed declining purchased transportation costs to "strong cost controls" and "network optimization," narratives that the February disclosure contradicted.

The May 2026 Expansion of Unreliability

On May 12, 2026, a second corrective disclosure compounded the damage. Hub Group announced it had "identified certain transactions that were prematurely or incorrectly recognized or not adequately supported," rendering its 2023 and 2024 annual reports unreliable. The Company further acknowledged it expected to conclude that internal controls were ineffective for each of those fiscal years. HUBG shares fell an additional 13%, declining 5.24 from 41.86 to close at $36.62.

The February 6, 2026, decline of 9.37 per share (18%) followed the 77 million cost understatement disclosureThe May 12, 2026, decline of $5.24 per share (13%) followed the expansion of unreliability to 2023 and 2024 financial statementsCombined per-share loss from the February 5 high: $14.71 (28.6%)Purchased transportation costs represented 74% to 76% of revenue annually, making the understatement material to every key profitability metricNo quantification of the 2023-2024 misstatement has been provided, leaving the full scope of investor harm unknown
Speak with an attorney about recovering damages or call (212) 363-7500.

"When companies fail to disclose material information, shareholders may suffer significant losses. The two corrective disclosures in this case erased nearly $15 per share of value in a matter of months, raising serious questions about the accuracy of Hub Group's reported financials throughout the Class Period." -- Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Join the HUBG recovery action or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. at (212) 363-7500.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP is a nationally recognized shareholder rights firm. Over the past 20 years, the firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Ranked in ISS Top 50 for seven consecutive years. 

Frequently Asked Questions About the HUBG Lawsuit

Q: How much did HUBG stock drop? A: Shares fell approximately 28.6% cumulatively, a decline of 14.71 per share, after Hub Group disclosed on February 5, 2026 that 77 million in costs had been understated, and then on May 12, 2026 that its 2023 and 2024 annual financial statements were also unreliable. Investors who purchased shares during the class period at artificially inflated prices may be entitled to compensation.

Q: What is the HUBG class action lawsuit about? A: A securities class action has been filed against Hub Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HUBG) alleging materially false and misleading statements between April 28, 2023 and May 11, 2026. The complaint contends that the Company understated its largest expense category and prematurely recognized revenue, causing shares to trade at artificially inflated prices.

Q: When did Hub Group allegedly mislead investors? A: The class period runs from April 28, 2023 to May 11, 2026. Throughout this period, the Company allegedly filed financial statements that materially misstated purchased transportation costs and accounts payable, and certified that internal controls were effective when they allegedly were not.

Q: What if I already sold my HUBG shares -- can I still recover losses? A: Yes. Eligibility is based on when you purchased, not whether you still hold them. Investors who bought during the class period and sold at a loss may still participate.

Q: What do HUBG investors need to do right now? A: Gather brokerage records including purchase dates, share quantities, and prices paid. Contact Levi & Korsinsky for a free, no-obligation evaluation at [email protected] or (212) 363-7500. No immediate action is required to remain eligible as a class member.

Q: What does it cost me to participate? A: Nothing. Securities class actions are handled on a pure contingency basis. No upfront fees, no retainer, no out-of-pocket costs.

Q: What is the HUBG lead plaintiff deadline? A: The deadline to apply for lead plaintiff appointment is August 28, 2026. This deadline applies only to investors seeking to serve as lead plaintiff. Class members who do not apply may still participate in any recovery without taking action before this date.

CONTACT:\

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP\

Joseph E. Levi, Esq.\

33 Whitehall Street, 27th Floor\

New York, NY 10004\

[email protected]\

Tel: (212) 363-7500\

Fax: (212) 363-7171

First ESG Report Highlights eVTOL Business Model as a Catalyst for Energy Transition, Urban Connectivity, and the Future of Sustainable Flight

, /PRNewswire/ -- Eve Air Mobility ("Eve") (NYSE: EVEX, EVEXW; B3: EVEB31), a global leader in electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft and urban air mobility (UAM) solutions, has published its inaugural Sustainability Report. The report outlines Eve's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) strategy and demonstrates how its integrated UAM ecosystem supports cleaner transportation, reduced congestion, and more connected cities.

The report reflects Eve's founding belief that urban air mobility represents an opportunity to transform how people move through cities while advancing aviation's transition to a more sustainable future.

"At Eve, sustainability is not a pillar we stand beside; it is the very foundation we build on. This report reflects who we are: a company pioneering the transition to zero-emission air mobility, powered by innovation, driven by purpose, and committed to a future where the skies are accessible, clean, and connected for everyone," said Johann Bordais, chief executive of Eve Air Mobility.

Created from the outset with sustainability at its core, Eve is developing an all-electric eVTOL aircraft expected to produce zero local carbon and particulate emissions during flight, providing a cleaner alternative to traditional aviation and ground transportation in urban environments.

Eve's urban air mobility ecosystem combines three integrated solutions:

eVTOL Aircraft: An all-electric aircraft designed for zero local emissions and low-noise operations. Eve Vector®: Air traffic management software that enables safe, scalable, and efficient Advanced Air Mobility operations. Eve TechCare®: Service and support solutions designed to help operators deploy and maintain fleets worldwide. Together, these solutions are designed to make urban air mobility a practical and sustainable complement to existing transportation networks.

Key ESG Highlights

Environment: Supporting the Energy Transition

Zero-Emission Aircraft: Eve's eVTOL aircraft is powered entirely by electricity and designed for zero local carbon and VOC emissions during operation. Renewable Energy: Eve's manufacturing operations in Brazil are powered by 100% renewable energy. Sustainable Manufacturing: The Company's planned production facility will incorporate energy-efficient technologies, water reuse systems, and sustainable waste management practices. Low Noise Design: Eve's aircraft is engineered for significantly quieter operations than conventional helicopters. Cleaner Production Processes: Water-based inks will be used during aircraft painting and finishing. Green Finance Framework: Supports financing aligned with Eve's sustainability objectives and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Social: Connecting Cities and Empowering People

UAM for Everyone: Expanding access to urban air transportation through integration with existing mobility networks. Great Place to Work® Certified: Recognized in 2024/2025 for fostering an inclusive and high-performing workplace culture. Equal Employment Workplace: In 2025, Eve's workforce of 210 employees benefited from a balanced mix of genders, experience levels, and backgrounds, supported by approximately 800 Embraer employees. Community Engagement: Through its partnership with the Embraer Institute, Eve supports education and community development initiatives. Learning and Development: Employees have access to training programs, language courses, conferences, and postgraduate education support. Governance: Accountability at the Core

Strong Governance: Eve maintains robust oversight through its Global Anticorruption Policy, Code of Conduct, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Human Rights Policy, transparent reporting practices, and active stakeholder engagement. Eve's Global Market Outlook identified a $280 billion passenger revenue opportunity over the next 20 years, driven by urbanization, increasing congestion, and growing demand for sustainable mobility solutions. In some of the world's most congested cities, urban air mobility has the potential to improve connectivity while supporting environmental goals.

Eve's ecosystem is designed to reduce congestion, improve air quality, and lower emissions while providing faster point-to-point urban transportation.

"Every city that integrates urban air mobility into its transportation network is a city that takes a tangible step toward a cleaner, less congested, more connected future. Our Sustainability Report is our commitment in writing to being the company that makes that possible," said Larissa Maraccini, vice president, People, Marketing, Communications and ESG at Eve Air Mobility.

Eve Air Mobility's 2025 Sustainability Report is available for download at Eve Air Mobility. The report was prepared in alignment with leading ESG disclosure frameworks and reflects Eve's commitment to transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement.

Eve Air Mobility is dedicated to accelerating the Urban Air Mobility (UAM) ecosystem. Benefitting from a start-up mindset, backed by Embraer's 56-year history of aerospace expertise, and with a singular focus, Eve is taking a holistic approach to progressing the UAM ecosystem, with an advanced eVTOL project, comprehensive global services and support network and a unique air traffic management solution. Eve is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (EVEX; EVEXW) and the São Paulo Stock Exchange (EVEB31), where its shares of common stock, public warrants and Brazilian Depository Receipts are traded. For more information, please visit www.eveairmobility.com

Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure 

Certain statements contained in this release are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "plan," "project," "could," "should," "would," "continue," "seek," "target," "guidance," "outlook," "if current trends continue," "optimistic," "forecast" and other similar words or expressions. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements about the company's plans, objectives, expectations, outlooks, projections, intentions, estimates, and other statements of future events or conditions, including with respect to all companies or entities named within. These forward-looking statements are based on the company's current objectives, beliefs and expectations, and they are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and financial position and timing of certain events to differ materially from the information in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those set forth herein as well as in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part I, Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors of the company's most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in the company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally, there may be other factors of which the company is not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the forward-looking statements and may also cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. The company does not assume any obligation to publicly update or supplement any forward-looking statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting these forward-looking statements. other than as required by law. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof or as of the dates indicated in the statement.

SOURCE Eve Air Mobility

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In PicS To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired PicS Class A Common stock in and/or traceable to PicS' January 30, 2026 initial public offering ("IPO") and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 13, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against PicS N.V. ("PicS" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: PICS) and reminds investors of the August 4, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) PicS N.V. had conducted an evaluation of its credit evaluation procedures in December 2025 and determined that such procedures were deficient and in need of enhancement; (2) as a result of the new procedures PicS N.V. had implemented in December 2025, PicS N.V. had reclassified approximately R$590 million of exposures previously classified as Stage 2 to Stage 3, leading to an incremental ECL charge of R$88 million in the three months ended December 31, 2025; (3) PicS N.V. had experienced a heightened, but unreported, Stage 3 formation rate of more than 7% in the fourth quarter of 2025 that deviated substantially from the historical results and trends provided in the offering documents; (4) the IPO's offering documents had materially overstated the quality and ability of PicS N.V.'s credit models and user data to inform PicS N.V.'s underwriting practices and to allow PicS N.V. to timely and effectively monitor, assess, and identify adverse credit events, credit risks, and credit deterioration across its portfolio; and (5) PicS N.V. suffered from degradations in customer credit quality and heightened risks of default and loan impairment as a result of its entrance into materially riskier business lines leading up to the IPO, resulting in undisclosed adverse financial and operational trends such as heightened incidents of default, which predated the IPO and were internally projected by PicS N.V. to continue to worsen following the IPO, materially impairing PicS N.V.'s business, operations, and financial results.

On or around January 29, 2026, PicPay conducted its initial public offering ("IPO"), selling 22.86 million Class A common shares priced at $19.00 per share.

Then, on March 18, 2026, PicPay released its fourth quarter 2025 financial results and revealed that, as part of the Company's "annual review of expected credit loss parameters," it had made several "enhancements" to its Expected Credit Loss ("ECL") calculations, and "implemented a stricter policy to accelerate the classification of renegotiated non-performing exposures from Stage 2 to Stage 3." Consequently, "R$590 million of Stage 2 portfolio balances were reclassified to Stage 3, resulting in an ECL increase of R$88 [$17.56 million USD]." Stage 3 is the Company's highest risk category for its credit portfolio.

On this news, PicPay's stock price fell $3.56 per share, or 22.5%, to close at $12.27 per share on March 19, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding PicS' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the PicS N.V. class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/PICS or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the PicS N.V. Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the PicS N.V. securities fraud lawsuit about?

The PicS N.V. securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that PicS N.V. (NASDAQ: PICS) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors in connection with the Company's January 30, 2026 IPO by concealing that the Company had already identified deficiencies in its credit evaluation procedures in December 2025, had reclassified approximately R$590 million of exposures from Stage 2 to Stage 3 (its highest credit risk category) resulting in an incremental expected credit loss charge of R$88 million, and was experiencing a Stage 3 formation rate exceeding 7% in Q4 2025 - a significant deviation from the historical trends presented in the IPO's offering documents. As the truth emerged on March 18, 2026, when PicS disclosed these credit portfolio deteriorations as part of its Q4 2025 financial results, PICS shares fell $3.56 per share, or 22.5%, to close at $12.27 - well below the $19.00 IPO price - causing significant losses for investors.

Who may be eligible to participate in the PicS N.V. class action lawsuit?

Investors who purchased PicS N.V. (PICS) Class A common stock in and/or traceable to the Company's January 30, 2026 initial public offering and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the PicS securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former PicS employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the PicS N.V. lawsuit?

A lead plaintiff in the PicS N.V. class action is a court-appointed investor - typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case - who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any PicS investor who purchased PICS Class A common stock in or traceable to the IPO may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is August 4, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.

What should investors do if they purchased PicS N.V. stock in the IPO?

Investors who purchased PicS N.V. (PICS) Class A common stock in and/or traceable to the January 30, 2026 IPO and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the PicS N.V. securities class action is August 4, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/PICS for more information.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/304764

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Commvault To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Commvault between January 28, 2025 and January 26, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 13, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Commvault Systems, Inc. ("Commvault" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: CVLT) and reminds investors of the July 17, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

Defendants provided investors with material information pertaining to Commvault's projected ARR growth for fiscal year 2026. Defendants' statements included, among other things, misleading guidance and projections related to the Company's new net ARR growth. Defendants provided these overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Commvault's ARR growth environment; pertinently, Commvault knew or recklessly disregarded that the Company's ARR growth guidance failed to properly factor in crucial variables, such as the type of sale. Such statements absent these material facts caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase Commvault's securities at artificially inflated prices.

On January 27, 2026, Commvault reported financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2026 ended December 31, 2025, including "40% growth in SaaS ARR to $364 million," as noted by the Company's Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO") during the earnings call to discuss these results. Additionally, the CAO said "60% of our deals actually closed in the last few weeks of the quarter." According to Bloomberg Intelligence, "SaaS ARR growth of 40% represents a meaningful deceleration from 56%" reported for the second quarter fiscal 2026.

Following this news, Commvault stock declined over 31% on January 27, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Commvault's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Commvault class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/CVLT or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Commvault Systems Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Commvault Systems securities fraud lawsuit about?

The Commvault Systems securities fraud lawsuit is a federal securities class action alleging that Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT) and its executives made false and misleading statements to investors by providing materially misleading guidance and projections related to the Company's annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth while concealing that its ARR growth guidance failed to properly account for crucial variables — such as the type of sale — that significantly affected the Company's true growth trajectory. As the truth emerged on January 27, 2026, when Commvault reported Q3 fiscal 2026 results showing SaaS ARR growth of only 40% — a meaningful deceleration from 56% in the prior quarter — CVLT's stock price fell over 31% in a single day, causing significant losses for investors.

Who may be eligible to participate in the Commvault Systems class action lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or acquired Commvault Systems (CVLT) stock between April 29, 2025 and January 26, 2026 — the Class Period — and suffered financial losses may be eligible to participate in the Commvault securities class action. Participation as a class member does not require taking any affirmative legal action; eligible investors may recover losses simply by remaining members of the class. Whistleblowers, former Commvault employees, and others with relevant information about the Company's conduct are also encouraged to come forward.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment in the Commvault Systems lawsuit?

A lead plaintiff in the Commvault Systems class action is a court-appointed investor — typically the one with the largest financial interest in the case — who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of all class members. Any Commvault investor who purchased CVLT stock during the Class Period may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice. The deadline to seek lead plaintiff appointment is July 17, 2026. Importantly, choosing not to seek the lead plaintiff role does not affect an investor's ability to share in any recovery obtained for the class.

What should investors do if they purchased Commvault Systems stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Commvault Systems (CVLT) stock between January 28, 2025 and January 26, 2026 and suffered losses should contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP immediately to discuss their legal rights. The deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Commvault Systems securities class action is July 17, 2026. To speak directly with securities litigation partner Josh Wilson, call 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310), or visit www.faruqilaw.com/CVLT for more information.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/304750

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals for new and old investors, and Zacks Premium offers many different ways to do both.

The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.

It also includes access to the Zacks Style Scores.

What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.

Each stock is given an alphabetic rating of A, B, C, D or F based on their value, growth, and momentum qualities. With this system, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on, meaning the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.

The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:

Value ScoreFinding good stocks at good prices, and discovering which companies are trading under their true value, are what value investors like to focus on. So, the Value Style Score takes into account ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and a host of other multiples to highlight the most attractive and discounted stocks.

Growth ScoreWhile good value is important, growth investors are more focused on a company's financial strength and health, and its future outlook. The Growth Style Score takes projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow into account to uncover stocks that will see long-term, sustainable growth.

Momentum ScoreMomentum traders and investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." This investing style is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Employing factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, the Momentum Style Score can indicate favorable times to build a position in high-momentum stocks.

VGM ScoreWhat if you like to use all three types of investing? The VGM Score is a combination of all Style Scores, making it one of the most comprehensive indicators to use with the Zacks Rank. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, which helps narrow down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.

How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank The Zacks Rank, which is a proprietary stock-rating model, employs earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings expectations, to make building a winning portfolio easier.

It's highly successful, with #1 (Strong Buy) stocks producing an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988. That's more than double the S&P 500. But because of the large number of stocks we rate, there are over 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, plus another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.

But it can feel overwhelming to pick the right stocks for you and your investing goals with over 800 top-rated stocks to choose from.

That's where the Style Scores come in.

To maximize your returns, you want to buy stocks with the highest probability of success. This means picking stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B. If you find yourself looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, make sure they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.

As mentioned above, the Scores are designed to work with the Zacks Rank, so any change to a company's earnings outlook should be a deciding factor when picking which stocks to buy.

For instance, a stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, even one that boasts Scores of A and B, still has a downward-trending earnings forecast, and a much greater likelihood its share price will decline as well.

Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.

Stock to Watch: AutoNation (AN - Free Report) AutoNation, Inc. is one of the largest automotive retailers in the United States. In addition to retailing new and used vehicles, the company provides maintenance and repair services, collision repair, wholesale parts, and a range of finance and insurance products. AutoNation also arranges vehicle financing through third-party sources and provides indirect financing through its captive auto finance company.

AN is a #3 (Hold) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of A.

It also boasts a Value Style Score of B thanks to attractive valuation metrics like a forward P/E ratio of 9.17; value investors should take notice.

Four analysts revised their earnings estimate higher in the last 60 days for fiscal 2026, while the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.06 to $21.35 per share. AN also boasts an average earnings surprise of +5.6%.

With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Value and VGM Style Scores, AN should be on investors' short list.

First Hawaiian NASDAQ: FHB and TriCo Bancshares have entered into a definitive agreement to combine in a 100% stock transaction valued at approximately $2 billion, according to remarks made on an investor call led by executives from both companies.

Bob Harrison, chairman, president and chief executive officer of First Hawaiian, said the transaction would create what he called “the leading Pacific banking franchise,” combining First Hawaiian’s Hawaii-based franchise and mainland lending experience with TriCo’s California retail banking network.

“This combination creates the leading Pacific banking franchise that is well-positioned to capture the growth opportunities in California and broader West Coast,” Harrison said.

Get First Hawaiian alerts:

TriCo shareholders will receive 2.095 shares of First Hawaiian common stock for each share of TriCo common stock, First Hawaiian Chief Financial Officer Jamie Moses said. Based on First Hawaiian’s closing stock price as of July 10, 2026, the transaction represents about $2 billion in aggregate value.

At closing, First Hawaiian shareholders are expected to own approximately 65% of the combined company, while TriCo shareholders are expected to own approximately 35%. The companies expect the deal to close in the fourth quarter, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals.

Combined Bank to Have $34 Billion in Assets Harrison said the combined company will have approximately $34 billion in assets, $22 billion in loans, $29 billion in deposits and 117 branches. He emphasized that First Hawaiian’s Hawaii franchise would remain central to the company’s identity.

“This partnership does not change our commitment to Hawaii,” Harrison said. “Hawaii remains the foundation of our franchise, and we will continue to be central to our identity.”

TriCo Bancshares, through Tri Counties Bank, operates a retail network across Northern California and the Central Valley, along with additional banking offices in three Southern California markets. Harrison said TriCo brings a differentiated deposit franchise, local leadership and credit discipline that align with First Hawaiian’s culture.

Rick Smith, chairman, president and chief executive officer of TriCo Bancshares, said the two companies share similar values, including relationship banking, disciplined credit and commitment to local communities.

“That cultural alignment gives me real confidence that First Hawaiian is the right banking partner for Tri Counties Bank,” Smith said.

Tri Counties Bank Brand to Remain in California Moses said Tri Counties Bank will retain its brand in California and that the companies do not anticipate any branch closures. Four TriCo directors, including Smith, are expected to join the First Hawaiian board. Smith will also serve as an adviser to the CEO, and TriCo executives Dan Bailey and Peter Wiese are expected to take senior leadership roles.

During the question-and-answer session, Smith said keeping the institution intact and avoiding branch closures should help with employee retention. Harrison added that First Hawaiian was seeking a partner with a strong management team that wanted to remain with the organization.

“We don’t have a management team to replace them with,” Harrison said. “Want to make real sure that we found the right partner, as we have with TriCo, for that reason.”

Financial Targets Include EPS Accretion and Cost Savings Moses said the transaction is priced at 1.98 times tangible book value and 14.4 times 2027 earnings, or 10.7 times fully synergized earnings based on expected cost savings of 25%.

First Hawaiian expects the deal to produce 6% earnings-per-share accretion, a high-teens internal rate of return, tangible book value dilution of less than 5% and an earnback period of 2.8 years. Moses said the combined company’s pro forma CET1 ratio is expected to be 12.4%.

Importantly, Moses said the financial metrics do not rely on branch closures or modeled revenue synergies. In response to an analyst question, he said the 25% cost savings assumption is expected to come from areas including information technology contracts and vendor consolidation.

“We’re confident we can get to a 25% number,” Moses said. “We think that’s very doable.”

Moses also said the model assumes no share repurchases through 2027, though First Hawaiian retains flexibility to buy back shares.

Executives Emphasize Deposit Strength and Credit Discipline Executives repeatedly highlighted the deposit franchises of both banks. Harrison said the combined company is expected to have top-decile deposit costs, no brokered balances and excess liquidity. Moses said TriCo’s liability-sensitive balance sheet should help reduce First Hawaiian’s asset sensitivity from an asset-liability management perspective.

In the Q&A session, Harrison and Smith said the combination is not intended to change the combined bank’s risk profile. Harrison said the near-term focus will be on integration, though the larger balance sheet could provide additional flexibility over time.

“We’re not really looking to change our risk profile at this time,” Harrison said. “We’ve got two very good operating banks.”

Smith said the deal provides greater scale and capacity, but not necessarily a shift toward larger or riskier lending.

“This just gives us the ability to have more scale and mass and do more volume, not necessarily bigger deals,” Smith said.

Harrison also said the companies have no current plans to prune legacy assets or loan portfolios at either First Hawaiian or TriCo. Moses said any future balance sheet optimization strategies were not included in the pro forma financial targets.

Integration and Growth Outlook Harrison said First Hawaiian has operated in California lending since 1995 and that nearly a quarter of its loan portfolio is currently based on the mainland. He said the company has lacked a branch network since its separation from Bank of the West, making TriCo’s California footprint strategically important.

Asked about integration risks, Harrison said First Hawaiian has experience with a recent core conversion, while Smith noted that TriCo has a track record of integrating prior acquisitions. Harrison said the companies will work with technology partners to determine the timing of a systems conversion after required approvals.

On growth, executives said the deal model is based on historical growth rates rather than aggressive assumptions. Moses said potential revenue synergies, cross-selling opportunities and larger loan holds could be additive but are not built into the model.

Harrison also briefly addressed First Hawaiian’s preliminary second-quarter 2026 results, describing them as strong, with solid profitability, continued net interest margin expansion and tangible book value per share growth. He said the company plans a more detailed second-quarter earnings discussion on July 24.

About First Hawaiian NASDAQ: FHBFirst Hawaiian, Inc is the oldest and largest bank in Hawaii, operating as the bank holding company for First Hawaiian Bank. Established in 1858, the company offers a full suite of financial services to individual, business and institutional clients. Its product portfolio includes consumer and commercial lending, deposit accounts, treasury and cash management, foreign exchange and trade finance, as well as wealth management and trust services.

First Hawaiian serves customers through an extensive network of branches, ATMs and digital channels across the Hawaiian Islands, Guam, Saipan and American Samoa.

This instant news alert was generated by narrative science technology and financial data from MarketBeat in order to provide readers with the fastest reporting and unbiased coverage. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].

Should You Invest $1,000 in First Hawaiian Right Now?Before you consider First Hawaiian, you'll want to hear this.

MarketBeat keeps track of Wall Street's top-rated and best performing research analysts and the stocks they recommend to their clients on a daily basis. MarketBeat has identified the five stocks that top analysts are quietly whispering to their clients to buy now before the broader market catches on... and First Hawaiian wasn't on the list.

While First Hawaiian currently has a Reduce rating among analysts, top-rated analysts believe these five stocks are better buys.

View The Five Stocks Here

With the proliferation of data centers and electric vehicles, the electric grid will only get more strained. Download this report to learn how energy stocks can play a role in your portfolio as the global demand for energy continues to grow.

Get This Free Report

Bloom Energy Corporation (NYSE:BE) shares are in the spotlight Monday following a volatile week that included two separate short-seller reports and a wave of analyst commentary.

Bloom Energy shares are sliding. Why is BE stock falling? Hunterbrook Media published an investigation on July 8 alleging Bloom Energy remains heavily dependent on China for scandium, a critical material used in its fuel cells — despite repeated statements from Bloom management denying any China-dependent supply chain.

The report also questioned whether the company can realistically scale production to its stated goal of 5 gigawatts annually, arguing that level of output would require roughly 220 tons of scandium oxide — close to projected global annual supply.

Bloom Energy pushed back forcefully against the Hunterbrook report, calling its allegations “false and misleading” and reaffirming the integrity of its audited financial statements. The company said it has clear visibility into its supply chain to support 25 gigawatts of annual fuel cell production and is not dependent on China to scale scandium oxide supply for future demand growth.

Separately, Crossroads Capital also disclosed a short position in Bloom Energy last week, expecting a repricing of the shares.

Analyst Consensus & Recent Actions The stock carries a Buy rating with an average price target of $259.50. Recent analyst moves include:

Susquehanna: Positive (Raises Target to $298.00) (July 10) Baird: Outperform (Maintains Target to $310.00) (July 9) Jefferies: Hold (Raises Target to $246.00) (July 6) Bloom Energy Shares FallBE Price Action: At the time of publication, Bloom shares are trading 5.83% lower at $230.34, according to data from Benzinga Pro.

Image via Shutterstock

This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.

For new and old investors, taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals. Zacks Premium provides lots of different ways to do both.

The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.

Zacks Premium includes access to the Zacks Style Scores as well.

What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores is a unique set of guidelines that rates stocks based on three popular investing types, and were developed as complementary indicators for the Zacks Rank. This combination helps investors choose securities with the highest chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.

Each stock is assigned a rating of A, B, C, D, or F based on their value, growth, and momentum characteristics. Just like in school, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on -- that means the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.

The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:

Value ScoreFor value investors, it's all about finding good stocks at good prices, and discovering which companies are trading under their true value before the broader market catches on. The Value Style Score utilizes ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and a host of other multiples to help pick out the most attractive and discounted stocks.

Growth ScoreWhile good value is important, growth investors are more focused on a company's financial strength and health, and its future outlook. The Growth Style Score takes projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow into account to uncover stocks that will see long-term, sustainable growth.

Momentum ScoreMomentum investors, who live by the saying "the trend is your friend," are most interested in taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook. Utilizing one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates, among other factors, the Momentum Style Score can help determine favorable times to buy high-momentum stocks.

VGM ScoreWhat if you like to use all three types of investing? The VGM Score is a combination of all Style Scores, making it one of the most comprehensive indicators to use with the Zacks Rank. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, which helps narrow down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.

How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank The Zacks Rank is a proprietary stock-rating model that harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings expectations, to help investors build a successful portfolio.

#1 (Strong Buy) stocks have produced an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988, which is more than double the S&P 500's performance over the same time frame. However, the Zacks Rank examines a ton of stocks, and there can be more than 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, and another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.

This totals more than 800 top-rated stocks, and it can be overwhelming to try and pick the best stocks for you and your portfolio.

That's where the Style Scores come in.

To have the best chance of big returns, you'll want to always consider stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B, which will give you the highest probability of success. If you're looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, it's important they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.

As mentioned above, the Scores are designed to work with the Zacks Rank, so any change to a company's earnings outlook should be a deciding factor when picking which stocks to buy.

For instance, a stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, even one that boasts Scores of A and B, still has a downward-trending earnings forecast, and a much greater likelihood its share price will decline as well.

Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.

Stock to Watch: SEI Investments (SEIC - Free Report) SEI Investments Co. – founded in 1968 – is headquartered in Oaks, PA. This asset management company is a leading provider of wealth management business solutions in the financial services industry. The company offers investment processing, management and operations solutions globally.

SEIC is a #2 (Buy) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of B.

Momentum investors should take note of this Finance stock. SEIC has a Momentum Style Score of A, and shares are up 6.8% over the past four weeks.

Two analysts revised their earnings estimate higher in the last 60 days for fiscal 2026, while the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.03 to $5.92 per share. SEIC also boasts an average earnings surprise of +17.4%.

With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Momentum and VGM Style Scores, SEIC should be on investors' short list.

Wall Street watches a company's quarterly report closely to understand as much as possible about its recent performance and what to expect going forward. Of course, one figure often stands out among the rest: earnings.

We know earnings results are vital, but how a company performs compared to bottom line expectations can be even more important when it comes to stock prices, especially in the near-term. This means that investors might want to take advantage of these earnings surprises.

Hunting for 'earnings whispers' or companies poised to beat their quarterly earnings estimates is a somewhat common practice. But that doesn't make it easy. One way that has been proven to work is by using the Zacks Earnings ESP tool.

The Zacks Earnings ESP, ExplainedThe Zacks Expected Surprise Prediction, or ESP, works by locking in on the most up-to-date analyst earnings revisions because they can be more accurate than estimates from weeks or even months before the actual release date. The thinking is pretty straightforward: analysts who provide earnings estimates closer to the report are likely to have more information.

With this in mind, the Expected Surprise Prediction compares the Most Accurate Estimate (being the most recent) against the overall Zacks Consensus Estimate. The percentage difference provides the ESP figure. The system also utilizes our core Zacks Rank to provide a stronger system for identifying stocks that might beat their next quarterly earnings estimate and possibly see the stock price climb.

When we join a positive earnings ESP with a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) or stronger, stocks posted a positive bottom-line surprise 70% of the time. Plus, this system saw investors produce roughly 28% annual returns on average, according to our 10 year backtest.

Most stocks, about 60%, fall into the #3 (Hold) category, and they are expected to perform in-line with the broader market. Stocks with a #2 (Buy) and #1 (Strong Buy) rating, or the top 15% and top 5% of stocks, respectively, should outperform the market, with Strong Buy stocks outperforming more than any other rank.

Should You Consider Cardinal Health?The final step today is to look at a stock that meets our ESP qualifications. Cardinal Health (CAH - Free Report) earns a #2 (Buy) 29 days from its next quarterly earnings release on August 11, 2026, and its Most Accurate Estimate comes in at $2.45 a share.

CAH has an Earnings ESP figure of +1.24%, which, as explained above, is calculated by taking the percentage difference between the $2.45 Most Accurate Estimate and the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.42. Cardinal Health is one of a large database of stocks with positive ESPs. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported.

CAH is just one of a large group of Medical stocks with a positive ESP figure. ResMed (RMD - Free Report) is another qualifying stock you may want to consider.

Slated to report earnings on August 6, 2026, ResMed holds a #3 (Hold) ranking on the Zacks Rank, and its Most Accurate Estimate is $2.95 a share 24 days from its next quarterly update.

ResMed's Earnings ESP figure currently stands at +1.58% after taking the percentage difference between its Most Accurate Estimate and its Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.90.

CAH and RMD's positive ESP figures tell us that both stocks have a good chance at beating analyst expectations in their next earnings report.

Find Stocks to Buy or Sell Before They're ReportedUse the Zacks Earnings ESP Filter to turn up stocks with the highest probability of positively, or negatively, surprising to buy or sell before they're reported for profitable earnings season trading. Check it out here >>

Key Takeaways Alcon and RxSight will develop adjustable PCIOLs that surgeons can fine-tune after cataract surgery.RxSight will receive $60M upfront and may earn up to $140M in development and regulatory milestones.Alcon will lead global commercialization, while RxSight will handle development and manufacturing. Alcon (ALC - Free Report) recently entered into a non-exclusive collaboration with RxSight (RXST - Free Report) to develop adjustable presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (PCIOLs) for cataract patients. The partnership will combine Alcon’s advanced PCIOL optical designs with RxSight’s post-operative light-adjustable technology, enabling surgeons to fine-tune patients’ visual outcomes after surgery.

The collaboration reflects both companies’ commitment to advancing customized vision care and expanding access to innovative cataract treatment solutions that improve patient outcomes.

Per management, Alcon’s leading PCIOLs have helped millions of cataract patients reduce or eliminate their dependence on glasses after surgery. By combining these lenses with RxSight’s technology, the company aims to develop tunable PCIOLs that will give surgeons greater confidence to refine post-surgery outcomes.

Likely Trend of ALC Stock Following the NewsShares of ALC have lost 0.8% since the announcement on July 6. Year to date, the stock has lost 14% compared with the industry’s 13.2% decline. However, the S&P 500 has risen 10.7% in the same timeframe.

The collaboration is expected to strengthen Alcon's position in the premium cataract surgery market by combining its PCIOL expertise with RxSight's light-adjustable technology. The partnership expands Alcon's innovation pipeline and supports the growing demand for personalized vision correction. With Alcon leading global commercialization and RxSight handling development and manufacturing, the companies can leverage their respective strengths. If successfully commercialized, the co-developed technology could accelerate the adoption of adjustable PCIOLs and support Alcon's long-term growth in advanced cataract care.

ALC currently has a market capitalization of $33.54 billion.

Image Source: Zacks Investment Research

More on the NewsUnder the agreement, RxSight will receive an upfront payment of $60 million to initiate development and may earn up to an additional $140 million upon achieving specified development and regulatory milestones. Alcon will oversee the global commercialization of the co-developed technology, while RxSight will be responsible for product development and manufacturing and will receive royalties based on future net sales.

RxSight expects its collaboration with Alcon to broaden patient access to customized visual outcomes after cataract surgery. The company believes the partnership highlights the importance of adjustable lens technology and will help accelerate its adoption among a larger patient population.

Industry Prospects Favoring the MarketGoing by data provided by Future Market Report, the presbyopia corrective intraocular lens (PCIOL) market is anticipated to be valued at $320.75 million in 2026 and is expected to witness a CAGR of 12.96% through 2033.

Factors like the rising prevalence of presbyopia and cataracts among aging populations, technological advancements in PCIOLs, growing adoption of cataract surgeries worldwide and increasing healthcare investments, favorable reimbursement policies and higher disposable incomes are driving the market’s growth.

Other NewsIn April, Alcon launched Clareon TruPlus, an enhanced monofocal and toric intraocular lens available in both standard and toric versions. The lens is designed to increase depth of focus while preserving high-quality distance vision. TruPlus demonstrated improved distance image quality, better simulated visual acuity at intermediate distances, lower glare and halo profiles and strong performance across varying pupil sizes and lighting conditions.

ALC’s Zacks Rank & Other Key PicksCurrently, ALC carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).

Some other top-ranked stocks from the broader medical space are Veracyte (VCYT - Free Report) and West Pharmaceutical (WST - Free Report) .

Veracyte, currently sporting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), reported first-quarter 2026 adjusted earnings of 52 cents per share, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 52.9%. Revenues of $139.1 million surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.6%. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

Veracyte has an estimated earnings growth rate of 5.1% for 2026. VCYT’s earnings surpassed estimates in the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 45.9%.

West Pharmaceutical, currently carrying a Zacks Rank #2, reported first-quarter 2026 earnings per share of $2.13, which beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 26.8%. Revenues of $844.9 million surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 8.5%.

West Pharmaceutical has an estimated long-term earnings growth rate of 13.9%. WST’s earnings surpassed estimates in the trailing four quarters, the average surprise being 19.4%.

Associated Banc-Corp's (ASB) Reset Rate Subordinated Notes (ASBA) offer compelling yields and appear undervalued relative to comparable securities. ASBA currently yields 6.625% fixed, with a potential reset to ~7.14% in 2028, and is priced at a discount, offering 8.6% YTC or 7.7% YTM. ASB demonstrates strong capital ratios, robust forward growth, and interest coverage, supporting the safety of ASBA's principal and interest payments.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Peabody Energy To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options

If you purchased or acquired securities in Peabody Energy between October 14, 2024 and May 4, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

[You may also click here for additional information]

New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 13, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Peabody Energy Corporation ("Peabody Energy" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BTU) and reminds investors of the August 24, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See www.faruqilaw.com.

As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: Defendants provided these overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Peabody Energy's Centurion mine and the multitude of issues causing delays to the ramp-up and the return to full longwall production dates. Such statements absent these material facts caused Plaintiff and other shareholders to purchase Peabody Energy's securities at artificially inflated prices.

On March 30, 2026, Peabody Energy issued a press release lowering guidance pertaining to Centurion mine's expected first quarter 2026 output, announcing that sales volume from the Centurion mine was expected to deliver approximately 250,000 tons in the first quarter due to "greater-than-anticipated mine commissioning challenges" (compared to previous estimates of around 700,000 tons). On this news, Peabody Energy's stock price fell $3.82, or approximately 9.7%, to close at $35.68 per share on March 30, 2026.

On May 5, 2026, Peabody Energy issued a press release disclosing the Company's failure to ramp-up Centurion by the long-awaited March 2026 deadline and cutting guidance related to full year met segment volumes to reflect the increased cost and substantial volume decrease, reducing the full year sales outlook for Centurion to 2.5 million tons compared to the original expectation of 3.5 million tons. On this news, Peabody Energy's stock price fell $1.52, or 5.7%, to close at $25.00 per share on May 5, 2026.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Peabody Energy's conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

To learn more about the Peabody Energy class action, go to www.faruqilaw.com/BTU or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310).

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Investors Regarding the Peabody Energy Securities Class Action Lawsuit:

What is the Peabody Energy securities fraud lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that Peabody Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: BTU) and certain of its officers and directors made materially false and misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true condition of the Company's Centurion mine, including the nature and severity of issues allegedly causing delays to its ramp-up and return to full longwall production. The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants provided investors with overwhelmingly positive statements about the Centurion mine while purportedly withholding information about the multitude of operational challenges affecting it. These allegedly false and misleading statements are said to have caused investors to purchase Peabody Energy securities at artificially inflated prices. The inflation in the stock price allegedly began to correct when Peabody Energy disclosed, on March 30, 2026, that first quarter 2026 output from the Centurion mine was expected to reach only approximately 250,000 tons - well below prior estimates of approximately 700,000 tons - due to "greater-than-anticipated mine commissioning challenges," and further when the Company disclosed on May 5, 2026 that it had failed to ramp up the mine by its March 2026 deadline and cut its full-year sales outlook for Centurion from 3.5 million tons to 2.5 million tons.

Who may be eligible to participate in the lawsuit?

Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Peabody Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: BTU) securities on the NASDAQ between October 14, 2024 and May 4, 2026, inclusive, may be eligible to participate in this lawsuit as members of the proposed class. Eligibility to participate is not limited to investors who seek appointment as lead plaintiff; any qualifying class member may share in any recovery that may ultimately be obtained. Investors who purchased Peabody Energy securities during the Class Period and suffered losses are encouraged to review their transaction records to determine whether they fall within the defined class. Participation in a class action does not require that an investor take any individual legal action or incur separate legal fees to potentially benefit from any recovery achieved on behalf of the class.

What is a lead plaintiff, and how can I seek appointment?

A lead plaintiff is a court-appointed representative who acts on behalf of all class members in directing the litigation, including making key decisions regarding litigation strategy and the selection of lead counsel. Any class member who purchased Peabody Energy securities during the Class Period and suffered a loss may move the court for appointment as lead plaintiff, and courts typically appoint the movant with the largest financial interest in the outcome of the litigation who otherwise satisfies applicable legal requirements. The deadline to file a motion seeking appointment as lead plaintiff is August 24, 2026. Importantly, investors are not required to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in order to participate in the class and share in any recovery that may result from the litigation - class members who do not serve as lead plaintiff retain the ability to benefit from any settlement or judgment.

What should investors do if they purchased Peabody Energy stock during the Class Period?

Investors who purchased Peabody Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: BTU) securities between October 14, 2024 and May 4, 2026, inclusive, are encouraged to promptly review their brokerage records and account statements to confirm the dates and prices at which they acquired and, if applicable, sold their shares. Investors should take steps to preserve all relevant documentation, including transaction confirmations, account statements, and any communications relating to their Peabody Energy holdings, as such records may be relevant to establishing eligibility and calculating losses. Given that the lead plaintiff motion deadline is August 24, 2026, investors wishing to be considered for appointment as lead plaintiff should act well in advance of that date. Investors may wish to consult with Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP or other qualified securities counsel to evaluate their legal rights and options before the deadline.

Why should investors contact Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP?

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP has represented investors in securities litigation for decades and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders. Investors who purchased Peabody Energy securities during the Class Period may contact the firm to discuss their legal rights, potential claims, and the lead plaintiff process at no cost or obligation.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/304762

Source: Faruqi & Faruqi LLP

Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.

Contact Us

Wall Street analysts expect Alcoa (AA - Free Report) to post quarterly earnings of $2.41 per share in its upcoming report, which indicates a year-over-year increase of 518%. Revenues are expected to be $3.93 billion, up 30.2% from the year-ago quarter.

Over the past 30 days, the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been adjusted downward by 14% to its current level. This demonstrates the covering analysts' collective reassessment of their initial projections during this period.

Prior to a company's earnings announcement, it is crucial to consider revisions to earnings estimates. This serves as a significant indicator for predicting potential investor actions regarding the stock. Empirical research has consistently demonstrated a robust correlation between trends in earnings estimate revision and the short-term price performance of a stock.

While investors typically rely on consensus earnings and revenue estimates to gauge how the business may have fared during the quarter, examining analysts' projections for some of the company's key metrics often helps gain a deeper insight.

That said, let's delve into the average estimates of some Alcoa metrics that Wall Street analysts commonly model and monitor.

The consensus among analysts is that 'Total sales- Aluminum' will reach $3.34 billion. The estimate indicates a change of +70.4% from the prior-year quarter.

Analysts' assessment points toward 'Total sales- Alumina' reaching $975.67 million. The estimate indicates a change of -35.7% from the prior-year quarter.

The combined assessment of analysts suggests that 'Third-party sales- Aluminum' will likely reach $3.40 billion. The estimate indicates a year-over-year change of +73.8%.

Analysts forecast 'Third-party sales- Alumina' to reach $489.67 million. The estimate indicates a change of -41.9% from the prior-year quarter.

It is projected by analysts that the 'Average realized third-party price per metric ton of alumina' will reach $319.06 . Compared to the present estimate, the company reported $378.00 in the same quarter last year.

Based on the collective assessment of analysts, 'Average realized third-party price per metric ton of aluminum' should arrive at $5009.54 . The estimate compares to the year-ago value of $3143.00 .

The consensus estimate for 'Average cost per metric ton of aluminum shipped' stands at $2578.81 . Compared to the present estimate, the company reported $2718.00 in the same quarter last year.

Analysts expect 'Third-party alumina shipments in Tons' to come in at 1569 thousands metric tons. The estimate compares to the year-ago value of 2195 thousands metric tons.

The average prediction of analysts places 'Alumina production in Tons' at 2351 thousands metric tons. Compared to the present estimate, the company reported 2351 thousands metric tons in the same quarter last year.

The collective assessment of analysts points to an estimated 'Aluminum production in Tons' of 619 thousands metric tons. Compared to the present estimate, the company reported 572 thousands metric tons in the same quarter last year.

According to the collective judgment of analysts, 'Bauxite production in Tons' should come in at 9 millions of metric ton. Compared to the current estimate, the company reported 9 millions of metric ton in the same quarter of the previous year.

Analysts predict that the 'Intersegment Alumina Shipments' will reach 1241 thousands metric tons. Compared to the present estimate, the company reported 1089 thousands metric tons in the same quarter last year.

View all Key Company Metrics for Alcoa here>>>

Over the past month, shares of Alcoa have returned -29.2% versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +4.3% change. Currently, AA carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), suggesting that it may underperform the overall market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> .

It doesn't matter your age or experience: taking full advantage of the stock market and investing with confidence are common goals for all investors. Luckily, Zacks Premium offers several different ways to do both.

The research service features daily updates of the Zacks Rank and Zacks Industry Rank, full access to the Zacks #1 Rank List, Equity Research reports, and Premium stock screens, all of which will help you become a smarter, more confident investor.

It also includes access to the Zacks Style Scores.

What are the Zacks Style Scores? The Zacks Style Scores, developed alongside the Zacks Rank, are complementary indicators that rate stocks based on three widely-followed investing methodologies; they also help investors pick stocks with the best chances of beating the market over the next 30 days.

Each stock is assigned a rating of A, B, C, D, or F based on their value, growth, and momentum characteristics. Just like in school, an A is better than a B, a B is better than a C, and so on -- that means the better the score, the better chance the stock will outperform.

The Style Scores are broken down into four categories:

Value ScoreFinding good stocks at good prices, and discovering which companies are trading under their true value, are what value investors like to focus on. So, the Value Style Score takes into account ratios like P/E, PEG, Price/Sales, Price/Cash Flow, and a host of other multiples to highlight the most attractive and discounted stocks.

Growth ScoreGrowth investors are more concerned with a stock's future prospects, and the overall financial health and strength of a company. Thus, the Growth Style Score analyzes characteristics like projected and historic earnings, sales, and cash flow to find stocks that will see sustainable growth over time.

Momentum ScoreMomentum trading is all about taking advantage of upward or downward trends in a stock's price or earnings outlook, and these investors live by the saying "the trend is your friend." The Momentum Style Score can pinpoint good times to build a position in a stock, using factors like one-week price change and the monthly percentage change in earnings estimates.

VGM ScoreWhat if you like to use all three types of investing? The VGM Score is a combination of all Style Scores, making it one of the most comprehensive indicators to use with the Zacks Rank. It rates each stock on their combined weighted styles, which helps narrow down the companies with the most attractive value, best growth forecast, and most promising momentum.

How Style Scores Work with the Zacks Rank The Zacks Rank, which is a proprietary stock-rating model, employs earnings estimate revisions, or changes to a company's earnings expectations, to make building a winning portfolio easier.

Investors can count on the Zacks Rank's success, with #1 (Strong Buy) stocks producing an unmatched +23.94% average annual return since 1988, more than double the S&P 500's performance. But the model rates a large number of stocks, and there are over 200 companies with a Strong Buy rank, plus another 600 with a #2 (Buy) rank, on any given day.

But it can feel overwhelming to pick the right stocks for you and your investing goals with over 800 top-rated stocks to choose from.

That's where the Style Scores come in.

To have the best chance of big returns, you'll want to always consider stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2 that also have Style Scores of A or B, which will give you the highest probability of success. If you're looking at stocks with a #3 (Hold) rank, it's important they have Scores of A or B as well to ensure as much upside potential as possible.

As mentioned above, the Scores are designed to work with the Zacks Rank, so any change to a company's earnings outlook should be a deciding factor when picking which stocks to buy.

For instance, a stock with a #4 (Sell) or #5 (Strong Sell) rating, even one that boasts Scores of A and B, still has a downward-trending earnings forecast, and a much greater likelihood its share price will decline as well.

Thus, the more stocks you own with a #1 or #2 Rank and Scores of A or B, the better.

Stock to Watch: Sonic Automotive (SAH - Free Report) Sonic Automotive is one of the leading automotive retailers in the United States. Apart from selling new and used cars and light trucks, the company offers warranties, service contracts, vehicle financing and insurance. Further, it provides maintenance and repair services, and sells replacement parts and aftermarket automotive products. Each sale of a new or used vehicle comes with financing and insurance options and helps the firm earn financing fees and insurance and other aftermarket product commissions. Each of the company’s franchised dealerships include a fully integrated service and parts department.

SAH is a #2 (Buy) on the Zacks Rank, with a VGM Score of A.

Momentum investors should take note of this Retail-Wholesale stock. SAH has a Momentum Style Score of B, and shares are up 11.7% over the past four weeks.

For fiscal 2026, two analysts revised their earnings estimate upwards in the last 60 days, and the Zacks Consensus Estimate has increased $0.14 to $6.94 per share. SAH boasts an average earnings surprise of +5.5%.

With a solid Zacks Rank and top-tier Momentum and VGM Style Scores, SAH should be on investors' short list.

Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction), along with the broader semi scene, is bouncing back again. It’s right back in the $5 trillion club again, but whether the GPU giant is ready to make a run for new highs remains the $6 trillion question. Indeed, it feels too early in the AI race to call a peak in the “picks and shovels” plays, especially with more huge earnings results up ahead.

As Nvidia collides with greater competition, with hyperscalers looking to innovate on custom silicon while hoping to take some of the heat away from GPUs, I do think that the firms Nvidia set its sights on are becoming increasingly exciting areas to put new money to work.

Will the AI race be won at the speed of light? While other investors look for the “next Nvidia” or “next DRAM” for a shot at quick, outsized gains, I think it pays more attention to look at what Nvidia’s top boss, Jensen Huang, is investing in. Of course, Nvidia has made so many deals in the past year, and as circular (or dismissible if you’re an AI skeptic who thinks semis are in a bubble) as they might seem, I do think that it’s hard to bet against the firms that Jensen Huang has been betting on.

Indeed, the optical connectivity plays may very well represent the next major chokepoint of the AI revolution. Arguably, it already is, as firms look to move into photonics, leaving copper and the so-called “copper wall” behind.

In my view, the “copper wall” might be one of the bigger hurdles that gets in the way of the top racers sprinting down that AI racetrack. And it’s the firms that are able to get aboard the leap faster than the rest of the pack that I think will gain a considerable edge in that road to superintelligence, where the second or third place finishers might not be all too happy with the returns on investment.

The Big Three optical connectivity darlings In any case, Coherent (NASDAQ:COHR), Lumentum (NADSAQ:LITE), and Corning (NYSE:GLW) have really picked up traction in recent years, but with the latest pullback in the names, I think there could be an opportunity for dip-buyers to consider nibbling into a position now that some of the froth has been taken right off the top.

Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

On the surface, each name still looks wildly expensive, even after the latest plunge into a bear market. Despite the recent market jitters, Wall Street pros still seem to be pounding the table.

With Street-high targets of $465 on Coherent (44% gain from here), $1,300 on Lumentum (62% gain), and $270 on Corning shares (42% gain), it’s clear that analysts aren’t all too rattled by the market’s recent action.

The wind remains at the back of these optical connectivity plays, and as long as AI demand stays robust while buildouts keep moving forward, Nvidia’s big optical connectivity bets might be significant winning bets that, once again, Jensen Huang’s firm spotted early in the game.

Of course, time will tell how the Nvidia-backed darlings fare, especially once rates increase, but, for the most part, I wouldn’t want to bet against the rise of the photonics plays. Whether you choose to bet on the glass fiber with Corning, optical transceivers with Coherent, or optical switches with Lumentum, I do think that each firm could keep rising in the market cap ranks from here, even with the latest setback.

Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

The recommendations of Wall Street analysts are often relied on by investors when deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock. Media reports about these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts changing their ratings often affect a stock's price. Do they really matter, though?

Let's take a look at what these Wall Street heavyweights have to say about Marvell Technology (MRVL - Free Report) before we discuss the reliability of brokerage recommendations and how to use them to your advantage.

Marvell currently has an average brokerage recommendation (ABR) of 1.41, on a scale of 1 to 5 (Strong Buy to Strong Sell), calculated based on the actual recommendations (Buy, Hold, Sell, etc.) made by 37 brokerage firms. An ABR of 1.41 approximates between Strong Buy and Buy.

Of the 37 recommendations that derive the current ABR, 28 are Strong Buy and three are Buy. Strong Buy and Buy respectively account for 75.7% and 8.1% of all recommendations.

Brokerage Recommendation Trends for MRVL

Check price target & stock forecast for Marvell here>>>

The ABR suggests buying Marvell, but making an investment decision solely on the basis of this information might not be a good idea. According to several studies, brokerage recommendations have little to no success guiding investors to choose stocks with the most potential for price appreciation.

Are you wondering why? The vested interest of brokerage firms in a stock they cover often results in a strong positive bias of their analysts in rating it. Our research shows that for every "Strong Sell" recommendation, brokerage firms assign five "Strong Buy" recommendations.

This means that the interests of these institutions are not always aligned with those of retail investors, giving little insight into the direction of a stock's future price movement. It would therefore be best to use this information to validate your own analysis or a tool that has proven to be highly effective at predicting stock price movements.

With an impressive externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, which classifies stocks into five groups, ranging from Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) to Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), is a reliable indicator of a stock's near-term price performance. So, validating the Zacks Rank with ABR could go a long way in making a profitable investment decision.

Zacks Rank Should Not Be Confused With ABRIn spite of the fact that Zacks Rank and ABR both appear on a scale from 1 to 5, they are two completely different measures.

The ABR is calculated solely based on brokerage recommendations and is typically displayed with decimals (example: 1.28). In contrast, the Zacks Rank is a quantitative model allowing investors to harness the power of earnings estimate revisions. It is displayed in whole numbers -- 1 to 5.

It has been and continues to be the case that analysts employed by brokerage firms are overly optimistic with their recommendations. Because of their employers' vested interests, these analysts issue more favorable ratings than their research would support, misguiding investors far more often than helping them.

On the other hand, earnings estimate revisions are at the core of the Zacks Rank. And empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.

Furthermore, the different grades of the Zacks Rank are applied proportionately across all stocks for which brokerage analysts provide earnings estimates for the current year. In other words, at all times, this tool maintains a balance among the five ranks it assigns.

Another key difference between the ABR and Zacks Rank is freshness. The ABR is not necessarily up-to-date when you look at it. But, since brokerage analysts keep revising their earnings estimates to account for a company's changing business trends, and their actions get reflected in the Zacks Rank quickly enough, it is always timely in indicating future price movements.

Is MRVL a Good Investment?Looking at the earnings estimate revisions for Marvell, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current year has remained unchanged over the past month at $4.04.

Analysts' steady views regarding the company's earnings prospects, as indicated by an unchanged consensus estimate, could be a legitimate reason for the stock to perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

The size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, has resulted in a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for Marvell. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>>

It may therefore be prudent to be a little cautious with the Buy-equivalent ABR for Marvell.

Investors in Parsons Corporation (PSN - Free Report) need to pay close attention to the stock based on moves in the options market lately. That is because the Nov 20, 2026 $35 Call had some of the highest implied volatility of all equity options today.

What is Implied Volatility?Implied volatility shows how much movement the market is expecting in the future. Options with high levels of implied volatility suggest that investors in the underlying stocks are expecting a big move in one direction or the other. It could also mean there is an event coming up soon that may cause a big rally or a huge sell-off. However, implied volatility is only one piece of the puzzle when putting together an options trading strategy.

What do the Analysts Think?Clearly, options traders are pricing in a big move for Parsons shares, but what is the fundamental picture for the company? Currently, Parsons is a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) in the Technology Services industry that ranks in the Top 44% of our Zacks Industry Rank. Over the last 60 days, no analysts have increased their earnings estimates for the current quarter, while one analyst has revised the estimate downward. The net effect has taken our Zacks Consensus Estimate for the current quarter from 76 cents per share to 74 cents in that period.

Given the way analysts feel about Parsons right now, this huge implied volatility could mean there’s a trade developing. Oftentimes, options traders look for options with high levels of implied volatility to sell premium. This is a strategy many seasoned traders use because it captures decay. At expiration, the hope for these traders is that the underlying stock does not move as much as originally expected.