Original source text
Adobe Inc. remains a compelling long-term investment, trading at historically low valuation multiples despite solid double-digit revenue and EPS growth. Management raised FY26 guidance, targeting $26.5–$26.6 billion in revenue and $17.90–$18.00 in GAAP EPS, reflecting confidence in sustained growth. A new $25 billion share buyback program, robust free cash flow, and the Semrush acquisition support both capital returns and strategic expansion. Live financial news intelligence
Track market-moving stories before they get noisy
Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.
Latest market signal
English
Cryptocurrencies
BTC
5,416
ETH
3,751
XRP
2,257
SOL
2,156
USDC
1,235
HYPE
1,120
Commodities
GOLD
318
SILVER
172
OIL
71
PLATINUM
9
PALLADIUM
4
COPPER
2
- FMP Stock News running now
- FMP Forex News 2m ago
- CoinGecko News 2m ago
- FIO Stock News 6m ago
- Patria Stock News 6m ago
- Editorial rewrite 1m ago
- Asset sync 6m ago
Latest coverage
Market News Feed
Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.
| Details | Date | Content | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:34
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:12
26d ago
|
Adobe: Creativity Is Necessary To Justify The Stock Price | FMP Stock News | |
|
|
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 11:29
26d ago
|
Vývoj cen komodit: Pšenice (+3,1 %), stříbro (-1,49 %), kukuřice (+0,98 %) | FIO Stock News | |
|
Original source text
15.7.2026 13:29Ropa +0,69 % na 79,89 USD za barel. Zemní plyn -0,24 % na 2,897 USD za mbtu. Zlato -0,83 % na 4035,8 USD za unci. Stříbro -1,49 % na 58,225 USD za unci. Měď -0,2 % na 6,3655 USD za libru. Kukuřice +0,98 % na 4,65 USD za bušl. Pšenice +3,1 % na 6,65 USD za bušl. Michal Šnobl Fio banka, a.s. Prohlášení |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 11:30
26d ago
|
Vývoj měnových párů: USD/CZK 21,22 | FIO Stock News | |
|
Original source text
15.7.2026 13:30EUR/USD 1,1415 (euro oslabuje o 0,04 %) USD/CZK 21,22 (dolar posiluje o 0,07 %) EUR/CZK 24,23 (euro posiluje o 0,03 %) GBP/CZK 28,4 (libra oslabuje o 0,01 %) CHF/CZK 26,16 (frank oslabuje o 0,12 %) PLN/CZK 5,5969 (zlotý posiluje o 0,02 %) Zdroj: Reuters Michal Šnobl Fio banka, a.s. Prohlášení |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:32
26d ago
|
Why Is IBM's Preliminary Report A Buy Signal For AI Beneficiaries? | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Investment ThesisAn Analysis of IBM’s Decline in Q2 2026 The Domino Effect as a Sign of a Systemic Crisis in the Software Sector image credit: Author The Obsolescence of Traditional Software Will Continue For example, consider ROI metrics for IBM and the companies benefiting from the AI supercycle. With Nvidia (NVDA) reporting a return on investment of 46.2%, Micron (MU) at 21.1%, and Alphabet (GOOGL) at 7.9%, IBM’s ROI stands at just 1.3%. IBM’s Warning—Not Just a Passing Storm image credit: Author Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy. Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:52
26d ago
|
What's Next for IBM Stock After 25% Collapse | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Shares in the IT company aren't mounting much of a comeback, as investors reel from Tuesday's brutal selloff. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:56
26d ago
|
IBM's CEO just showed what taking accountability looks like | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
IBM's CEO just showed what taking accountability looks like By You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email.IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is widely credited with turning the company around since becoming CEO in 2020. Alex Wong/Getty Images When IBM delivered bad news on Tuesday, CEO Arvind Krishna didn't look for someone else to blame. He owned it. Krishna, who is widely credited with turning IBM around since becoming CEO in 2020, said in a letter to investors that clients had redirected quarterly capital spending toward scarce infrastructure. Management underestimated the scale of that shift, contributing to the company's second-quarter shortfall. "These conditions require our teams to execute perfectly, and this quarter we faltered," Krishna wrote. "We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected." Though IBM's shares tanked in response, current and former tech executives told Business Insider that other leaders ought to emulate Krishna's candor. Owning a setback can strengthen a CEO's credibility longterm, they said, by showing that management understands the problem and is prepared to address it. "He will develop more trust among his shareholders and employees and customers by being transparent," said former Cisco CEO John Chambers. Leaders can gain more credibility from how they handle setbacks than from their successes, he added, though they need to move quickly. They should explain what happened, acknowledge what did not go as planned, and outline how they intend to get the business back on track. "Rule 101 on setbacks: speed and be very visible," Chambers said. Openness carries risks, though. Leaders facing a setback may not yet have complete answers, and acknowledging uncertainty can leave them vulnerable. "You have to have the courage to say, 'Here's what I know. Here's what I don't know,' " Chambers said. "And that sometimes exposes you to critics." Accepting responsibilityGilad Bechar, CEO of Moburst, a digital marketing agency, described Krishna's remarks as "refreshing." He said CEOs often attribute disappointing results to outside forces such as tariffs or other macroeconomic headwinds. "Usually you don't see Fortune 100 companies that are owning their situation like that," said Bechar. "They are very afraid of being this candid." Krishna may have helped contain the damage by characterizing the shortfall as a forecasting error rather than as evidence that demand for the company's products and services had deteriorated, added Bechar. Showing that management understood what went wrong gives investors reason to believe the problem can be corrected, he said. "If you're in control of the situation, you fully understand everything, and you just misjudge one specific element, it sounds like you're in a much better place," Bechar said. Public-company leaders may be obligated to disclose material setbacks promptly, but accepting responsibility is a choice, said Jeffrey Puritt, the retired CEO of Telus International, a technology services provider now known as Telus Digital. Krishna could have satisfied investors' need for information without explicitly owning up to management's mistake. By doing both, Puritt said, he demonstrated the accountability expected of someone in the top job. "If you're the CEO, you get paid to take responsibility for the business's performance, win, lose, or draw," he said. Blaming others, Puritt added, would have been "a bit of a cop out." 'What you need to hear'Krishna has spent more than three decades at IBM. He helped orchestrate the company's $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat, which closed in 2019, and became CEO the following year. Since then, he's led an overhaul centered on hybrid cloud, software, and artificial intelligence. Rod Adkins, a former IBM executive who also spent more than three decades at the company, said transparency is consistent with Krishna's leadership style. "He has always been what I would call an above-the-board executive," Adkins said. "He will deliver what you need to hear versus what you want to hear." That approach is especially important at a company like IBM, whose technology supports mission-critical operations, such as banking transactions and systems used by healthcare providers, airlines, retailers, and government agencies. "Part of the trusted brand is being authentic with your communications," Adkins said. "Transparency, especially today, is a very important leadership attribute." Read next Sarah E. Needleman You're currently following this author! Want to unfollow? Unsubscribe via the link in your email. Sarah E. Needleman covers leadership and the workplace for Business Insider.Previously, she was a reporter for The Wall Street Journal for more than two decades, covering technology companies, entrepreneurship, and recruiting.In 2022, Sarah received an honorable mention with WSJ colleagues for their coverage of workplace misconduct at Activision Blizzard from the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing.Sarah graduated from Rutgers University in 1997 with a bachelor's degree in journalism. She lives with her husband, daughter, and fur child (an Australian labradoodle) in northern New Jersey.Have feedback or a tip?Contact Sarah on Signal at saraheneedleman.13, or email her at [email protected] of Sarah’s scoops, exclusives, and most-read articles include: 'Entitled,' 'complacent,' and 'sloppy': Inside the workplace tension at the world's largest HR organizationShe won a religious exemption from using AI at work. The Pope's remarks could fuel similar appeals.The CEO behind 'Grand Theft Auto' doesn't drink, smoke, or play video gamesPTO, parental leave, pensions: Even the most prized benefits are on the chopping blockGoodbye, middle managers. Hello, 'player-coaches' and 'org leads.'She used to manage 3 employees. Now she oversees 24. Welcome to the age of the megamanager.America's new sink-or-swim era is hereInside the AI divide roiling video game giant Electronic ArtsMeet your new office bestie: ChatGPT IBM Leadership |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
IBM Launches New Power Systems and Software Built for Enterprises to Address Risk, Productivity, and Flexibility | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
New IBM Power Autonomous Operations software identifies and resolves capacity constraints up to 15x1 faster than manually performing the operation IBM Bob™ Premium Package for i helps accelerate application development on IBM i Entry-level Power S1112 server helps enterprises innovate at every scale , /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced IBM Power Autonomous Operations, an AI agent that can help continuously monitor Power systems and autonomously resolve issues to keep operations running smoothly. It complements the recently launched IBM Bob™ Premium Package for i, which brings agentic-driven software designed to accelerate application development on IBM i. These capabilities can accelerate building modern applications so enterprises can innovate at the pace required by their business. Additionally, the entry-level Power S1112 server provides a new compact, efficient option powerful enough to run AI inference locally.IBM Power S1112, a 1-socket, half-wide Power11 server. (Image credit: Thomas Prior for IBM) IBM PowerS1112, tower chassis form factor. (Image credit: Thomas Prior for IBM) IBM Power has long been IBM's platform for mission-critical enterprise workloads. As AI becomes part of that critical infrastructure, Power is built to support it. IBM introduced Power11 last year as autonomous IT for the AI era, built for availability, resiliency, and scale across on-premises and IBM Cloud environments. IBM Power Virtual Server is a fully managed cloud service on which enterprises can run AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads while offloading much of the routine management for system operations. Now, IBM is embedding autonomous IT across the Power platform, from code to runtime, with new capabilities and systems. According to the IBM IBV 2026 Tech Leader Study: Building the IT foundation for agentic AI at scale, by 2027, enterprises expect to deploy an average of 1,661 AI agents—a 38% increase. At that rate, tech leaders are tasked with managing hundreds of thousands of autonomous decisions daily. And manual governance can't keep up with that math.2 Additionally, according to the IBM Institute for Business Value, Enterprise 2030 study, AI is changing what companies do and how they do it.3 Closing that gap in scale requires an IT foundation that can run and optimize itself while teams focus on innovation. These newly announced capabilities utilize AI agents to build automation directly into IBM Power across operations, security, and application development so clients can innovate with AI while prioritizing control and resilience. Power Autonomous Operations automates running and optimizing systems, with an embedded agent that lets teams manage Power through simple chat-style prompts. IBM Bob Premium Package for i makes IBM i development accessible to a broad range of engineers, expanding who can build and modernize their applications on the platform. "Enterprises should not need to choose between moving at the speed of AI and keeping their systems stable and secure," said Hillery Hunter, General Manager for IBM Power and CTO, IBM Infrastructure. "We're making Power increasingly self-operating, so the routine work of helping to keep systems available, optimized, and secured can happen autonomously, and our clients' teams can spend their time on innovation instead of upkeep. That's how a business scales AI with control and resilience." IBM Power S1112: Extending the Capabilities of Power Servers As enterprises push AI workloads beyond the data center, the IBM Power S1112 is a new one-socket Power11 system built for compact on-prem deployment. The S1112 runs AI workloads locally using Power11 on-chip Matrix Math Acceleration (MMA) for faster inferencing. Power S1112 offers 2x better core performance versus Power S9144 and 3x better core performance versus Power S8145 — with up to 69% greater energy efficiency than the S9146. To provide clients with the right level of support for this new system, IBM Technology Lifecycle Services is introducing IBM Power Expert Care Premium Essentials, a new incident-focused support tier available exclusively for the Power S1112. Premium Essentials delivers priority access to IBM experts, accelerated response, and intelligent support automation. IBM Power Autonomous Operations: Managing Infrastructure Through Conversation IBM Power Autonomous Operations resolves capacity constraint issues up to 15x faster than manual intervention7. Today's enterprise systems can seem to demand constant attention, but manual operations management can make it difficult to manage. IBM Power Autonomous Operations redefines this model by automating and optimizing day-to-day operations across the IBM Power environment. An embedded AI agent that enables natural, conversational interaction can help teams to manage, tune, and streamline their environments without relying on deep domain expertise for every task. The result is a resilient, self-optimizing infrastructure architected to reduce operational burden while accelerating performance and uptime. IBM Bob Premium Package for i: Making IBM i Development Accessible to More Engineers IBM i is a fully integrated operating system that remains a vital part of the core business of many companies across major industries, yet modernizing IBM i applications has historically required specialized skills for RPG applications. To help address this challenge, IBM Bob is an AI-powered development assistant that offers an agentic SDLC experience for enterprise developers. IBM Bob Premium Package for i is engineered to provide built-in support for IBM i conventions and patterns across the full development lifecycle, to help engineers make changes faster, onboard sooner, and evolve applications while prioritizing team capacity along the way. From understanding complex code to moving modernization and AI projects forward, IBM Bob can expand the pool of developers who improve the IBM i applications that organizations depend on every day. Early adopters are already seeing results: Heartland Co-Op estimates 60% faster time for new-to-platform developers to understand complex applications.8 Client Momentum Clients and partners are already running IBM Power on premises and in the cloud, drawn by its performance, resilience, and hybrid flexibility: "For a business like ours, reliability and simplicity matter because our customers depend on us every day. IBM Power and IBM i have consistently delivered the stability and security we need to support our operations with confidence. And that continues with the introduction of IBM Bob and the IBM Power S1112. What excites me most about the new Power S1112 is the ability to do more with less through increased capacity, energy efficiency, and the growing focus IBM has on automation, making systems easier to manage for small and midsized businesses. We are also excited about how IBM Bob for IBM i can help our team accelerate modernization by quickly interpreting older RPG code, tracing field logic, generating documentation, and making decades of system knowledge easier to understand and act on. Together, IBM Power, IBM i, and IBM Bob give us a forward-looking foundation to modernize with confidence while continuing to deliver the reliability our business depends on." Jasmine Kaczmarek, vice president of technology, M.R. Williams. "What I noticed about IBM Bob almost immediately was the level of detail provided as compared to other AIs. I like using AI to build and execute plans for specific projects. Given the exact same prompt, Bob's planning was always 10-fold more detailed than other AIs. More specifics, more details, and provided a better understanding of the steps through the project from beginning to end." Bob Richardson, ERP Support Analyst, Wynne Systems, Inc. "The new IBM Power S1112 provides us with the flexibility to expand beyond traditional workloads and explore new AI opportunities by running Linux partitions alongside our IBM i environment," said Andy Buchholtz, Owner, Innovative Software Solutions. "Combining that flexibility with the security, reliability, and resilience we trust from the IBM Power platform gives us confidence as we continue to innovate and modernize our business." "We're no longer reacting to weather. We're prepared for it," said Chad Simpson, CIO, City Home. "Our infrastructure is built to keep the business running, no matter what. We've honed our process to perform role swaps every quarter, and this capability gives us great confidence in our business continuity posture. It's a powerful thing, and it's all thanks to IBM Cloud and Power Virtual Server." Availability IBM Power S1112 is expected to be generally available on July 24, 2026, IBM Power Autonomous Operations is expected to be generally available on September 23, 2026, and IBM Bob Premium Package for i was made generally available on June 24, 2026. To learn more, visit ibm.com/power. Statements regarding IBM's future direction and intent are subject to change or withdrawal without notice and represent goals and objectives only. About IBM IBM is a leading provider of global hybrid cloud and AI, and consulting expertise. We help clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Thousands of government and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM's hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently and securely. IBM's breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and consulting deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM's long-standing commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity and service. Additional Sources Power S1112 and autonomous IT capabilities blog IBM Power S1112 product page IBM Institute for Business Value Enterprise 2030 study Media contact: Sarah Fraser IBM Infrastructure Communications [email protected] 1 Disclaimer 1: The performance and capacity management efficiency claim is based on IBM internal testing conducted in a controlled, representative IBM Power infrastructure environment consisting of eleven IBM Power systems. Capacity thresholds and alerting policies were preconfigured prior to test execution. Under this configuration, the manual operational process entailed—navigating to the performance dashboard for each system, exporting performance data to CSV/XLS format, reviewing and analyzing the data to identify required capacity adjustments, and implementing the changes—required on average 52.59 minutes to detect and resolve capacity‑related conditions across the eleven systems. In a comparable scenario, IBM Power Autonomous Operations, which includes alert ingestion and AI-based, agent-driven diagnostic analysis producing recommended and remedial actions with human-in-the-loop approval to remediate, completed the same process in on average 3.33 minutes. 2 https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/c-suite-study/cxo 3 https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/enterprise-2030 4 Based on published CPW results comparing Power S1112/4 core to IBM Power S914/4 core. Valid as of 7/14/2026 and available at: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/10c31775c5d40fed 5 Based on published CPW results comparing Power S1112/4 core to IBM Power S814/4 core. Valid as of 7/14/2026 and available at: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/10c31775c5d40fed 6 Based on system capability of Power S1112/10c performance 291,300E CPW (extrapolated from 116,500 CPW for 4-cores) @ 540E Watts (539 Performance/Watt) compared to Power S914/8cperformance of 122,500 CPW @ 383 Watts (319 Performance/Watt); 539 / 319 = 1.69 more Performance/Watt 7 Disclaimer 1: The performance and capacity management efficiency claim is based on IBM internal testing conducted in a controlled, representative IBM Power infrastructure environment consisting of eleven IBM Power systems. Capacity thresholds and alerting policies were preconfigured prior to test execution. Under this configuration, the manual operational process entailed—navigating to the performance dashboard for each system, exporting performance data to CSV/XLS format, reviewing and analyzing the data to identify required capacity adjustments, and implementing the changes—required on average 52.59 minutes to detect and resolve capacity‑related conditions across the eleven systems. In a comparable scenario, IBM Power Autonomous Operations, which includes alert ingestion and AI-based, agent-driven diagnostic analysis producing recommended and remedial actions with human-in-the-loop approval to remediate, completed the same process in on average 3.33 minutes. 8 Heartland Co-op Modernizes Grain Operations with IBM i and IBM Bob SOURCE IBM |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$IBM Investor Loss Alert: IBM Investors may have been Misled after IBM Z Product Slowdown Announcement Leads to 25% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) for potential securities fraud after its significant stock drop.If you invested in IBM, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the IBM ($IBM) Class Action Investigation: Investigation Overview: Securities fraud relating to IBM’s misrepresentations about the pace of securing new business deals and the strength of its IBM Z product outlook Stock Decline: July 14, 2026 – 25% Stock DropAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Why is IBM Being Investigated for Securities Fraud? IBM is being investigated for securities fraud following a significant stock drop. The decline in IBM’s stock price caused significant losses to investors. IBM is a global technology and consulting company that focuses on hybrid cloud and artificial intelligence. IBM uses IBM Z to deliver enhanced AI acceleration through multi-model AI capabilities, low unit cost architecture at scale for workloads that require end-to-end encryption, continued availability, and ultra-high throughput. BFA is investigating whether IBM misled investors about its pace securing new business deals and the strength of its IBM Z outlook. Why did IBM’s Stock Drop? On July 14, 2026, IBM released its 2026 Q2 financial results. IBM announced a disappointing quarter that it attributed to “a shortfall in our Z performance and the associated software stack, primarily in Transaction Processing.” IBM also revealed that it had “faltered,” and “did not adapt and move quickly enough” so that “numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall.” This news caused the price of IBM stock to decline over $75 in intraday trading on July 14, 2026, or over 25%. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in IBM, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ibm-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:20
26d ago
|
IBM stock plunges 25% a day after ‘Buy' signal from Jim Cramer | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
As International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM) stock crashed amid a shift in enterprise tech spending, as of July 15, Jim Cramer had previously recommended that investors buy the shares.On July 13th, at the Mad Money show, Cramer said investors ought to buy some IBM stock immediately and add on potential market dips. Less than 24 hours later, IBM stock crashed over 25% as the company missed its quarterly revenue forecast. Cramer’s disastrous timing on IBM stock outlook was potentially exaggerated by the inverse Cramer movement. Nonetheless, after the company reported that it forecast a revenue of $17.2 billion in the second quarter, below expectations of $17.86 billion, Cramer shifted his sentiment. On Tuesday, Cramer said that IBM has landed on the wrong side of enterprise tech spending amid the AI boom. Moreover, enterprise tech spending has been shifting toward hardware investments rather than software allocations. “That’s the new reality, and I have no idea when it will change, which is why I can’t recommend IBM, not even after today’s severe decline,” Cramer said. Notably, IBM stock has underperformed core AI stocks, led by semiconductor stocks. Furthemore, IBM stock price has been outshined by Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ: NVDA), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Marvell Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD), and Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO) over the past 5 days. What’s IBM stock price forecast for 2026 and outlook? Although International Business Machines, under CEO Arvind Krishna, continues to realign its business towards the AI boom, Wall Street analysts have set a ‘Moderate Buy’ rating and an average price target of $303.83 for the next 12 months, as Finbold reported. IBM 5-day chart. Source: Finbold Following IBM’s worst day in decades on Tuesday, the shares closed at $217.08, down more than 27% over the past five days. However, IBM stock had rebounded slightly during Wednesday’s pre-market session, hovering around $219.32, resulting in a market capitalization of approximately $204.0 billion at press time. Nevertheless, the company’s stock has retested a major multi-month support level amid modest bullish sentiment from Wall Street, thus potentially explaining the mixed signals from Cramer. Best Crypto Exchange for Intermediate Traders and Investors Invest in cryptocurrencies and 3,000+ other assets including stocks and precious metals. 0% commission on stocks - buy in bulk or just a fraction from as little as $10. Other fees apply. For more information, visit etoro.com/trading/fees. Copy top-performing traders in real time, automatically. eToro USA is registered with FINRA for securities trading. 30+ million Users worldwide eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more. Join Finbold's newsroom, become a Sales Executive today! Apply now to join Finbold as a crypto/finance news writer! |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 07:00
26d ago
|
Merck to Present New Data on Daily, Weekly, and Monthly Options Across its HIV Treatment and Prevention Pipeline at AIDS 2026 | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
RAHWAY, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $MRK #MRK--Merck to Present New Data on Daily, Weekly, and Monthly Options Across its HIV Treatment and Prevention Pipeline at AIDS 2026. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:33
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$MGM Investor Alert: MGM Resorts Investors may have Rights in Potential Acquisition – Contact BFA Law if You Hold Shares | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that it is investigating Barry Diller’s bid to buy MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM). MGM is incorporated in Delaware.Barry Diller is a member of MGM’s board of directors. People, Inc. (“People,” f/k/a/ IAC, Inc.), a company that Diller founded and controls, is MGM’s largest single stockholder. On June 1, 2026, People made an unsolicited bid to buy the remaining MGM stock for $48.30 per share. If you are a current shareholder of MGM, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/mgm-resorts-investigation. Key Details of the MGM ($MGM) Investigation: Investigation Overview: Breaches of Fiduciary Duty in connection with Barry Diller’s offer to acquire the remaining stock of MGM for $48.30 per shareAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Why is the MGM Transaction being Investigated? As a director, Diller owes fiduciary duties to MGM and its stockholders. People also recently entered a governance agreement with MGM that gave People the right to designate two MGM directors going forward. Because Diller “stands on both sides” of the proposed deal, and because other MGM fiduciaries could potentially receive benefits that other stockholders do not receive, these facts create a create conflicts of interest under Delaware law. If MGM and Diller reach an agreement, they must comply with Delaware’s strict requirements for “cleansing” these conflicts and ensuring the deal is fair to MGM’s stockholders. In a news release on June 1, MGM stated that the board of directors “will carefully review and consider the proposal to determine the course of action that it believes is in the best interests of the Company and all of its shareholders.” BFA is investigating whether the potential agreement complies with Delaware law. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/mgm-resorts-investigation What Can You Do? If you are a current holder of MGM stock, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/mgm-resorts-investigation Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/mgm-resorts-investigation Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:30
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:30
26d ago
|
Oracle: Deep Value Hyperscaler Masquerading As A Software Stock | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
38K FollowersAnalyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of ORCL either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:30
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:46
26d ago
|
Tradr's 2X Short Leveraged ETFs on AAOI and ORCL Begin Trading | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The first 2X short ETFs on Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle are now availableFunds represent first-to-market inverse strategies on Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle Corporation , /PRNewswire/ -- Tradr ETFs, a provider of ETFs designed for sophisticated investors and professional traders, today launched two new leveraged ETFs on the stocks of Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle Corporation. The Cboe-listed funds seek to deliver two times short (-200%) the daily performance of their underlying target stocks. The following ETFs are expected to open for trading today: Tradr 2X Short AAOI Daily ETF (Cboe: AAOZ) – tracks Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (Nasdaq: AAOI) Tradr 2X Short ORCL Daily ETF (Cboe: ORCZ) – tracks Oracle Corporation (NYSE: ORCL) The launch follows the strong adoption of the Tradr 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF (AAOX), which began trading on March 24, 2026, and has grown to over $275 million in assets under management. AAOZ now provides active traders with a complementary tool for expressing bearish views or hedging existing positions in Applied Optoelectronics. "Both Applied Optoelectronics and Oracle have become important AI infrastructure narratives, but they're driven by very different catalysts and can experience significant price swings," said Matt Markiewicz, Head of Product and Capital Markets at Tradr ETFs. "AAOZ and ORCZ give sophisticated traders efficient tools to capitalize on downside opportunities or hedge long exposure without using margin or options. As volatility around AI-related stocks continues, we expect demand for both bullish and bearish trading vehicles to remain strong." With today's launches, Tradr currently has 74 leveraged ETFs in its lineup. Its strategies can be accessed through most brokerage platforms and allow investors to avoid the hassle of using margin and the complexity of options trading. The firm continues its mission of providing sophisticated investors with innovative trading tools that enhance their ability to express market views with precision and efficiency. For detailed information on Tradr ETFs and the significant risks involved with leveraged ETFs, please visit www.tradretfs.com. About Tradr ETFs Tradr ETFs are designed for sophisticated investors and professional traders who are looking to express high conviction investment views. The strategies include leveraged and inverse ETFs that seek short or long exposure to actively traded stocks and ETFs. IMPORTANT RISK INFORMATION Tradr ETFs are for sophisticated investors and professional traders with high conviction views and are very different from most other ETFs. The Funds are intended to be used as short-term trading vehicles and pursue leveraged investment objectives, which means they are riskier than alternatives that do not use leverage because the Funds magnify the performance of their underlying security. The volatility of the underlying security may affect a Fund's return as much as, or more than, the return of the underlying security. Investors in the fund should: (a) understand the risks associated with the use of leverage; (b) understand the consequences of seeking inverse and leveraged investment results; (c) for short ETFs, understand the risk of shorting; (d) intend to actively monitor and manage their investment. Fund performance will likely be significantly different than the benchmark over periods longer than the specified reset period and the performance may trend in the opposite direction than its benchmark over periods other than that period. Leverage increases the risk of a total loss of an investor's investment, may increase the volatility of the Funds, and may magnify any differences between the performance of the Funds and their reference security. The Funds seek leveraged investment results for a specific period (daily, monthly or quarterly). The exact exposure of an investment in the Fund intra-period will depend upon the movement of the reference security from the end of the prior period until the time of investment by the investor. The Fund will not attempt to position its portfolio to ensure it does not gain or lose more than a maximum percentage of its net asset value on a given trading day. As a consequence, investors in a Fund that seeks two times daily performance would lose all of their money if the Fund's underlying security moves more than 50% in a direction adverse to the Fund on a given trading day. ETFs involve risk including possible loss of the full principal value. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. Principal risks and other important risks may be found in the prospectus. Past performance does not guarantee future results. ETF shares are bought and sold at market price (not NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the ETF. There can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will develop or be maintained, or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. Buying or selling ETF shares on an exchange may require the payment of brokerage commissions and frequent trading may incur brokerage costs that detract significantly from investment returns. Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Funds. This and other important information about the Fund is contained in the Prospectus, which can be obtained by visiting www.tradretfs.com. The Prospectus should be read carefully before investing. Distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc, which is not affiliated with AXS Investments or its Tradr ETFs. AXI000994 SOURCE Tradr ETFs |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:28
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:30
26d ago
|
M&T Bank Corporation (NYSE:MTB) announces second quarter 2026 results | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- M&T Bank Corporation ("M&T" or "the Company") reports quarterly net income of $818 million or $5.32 of diluted earnings per common share.(Dollars in millions, except per share data) 2Q26 1Q26 2Q25 Earnings Highlights Net interest income $ 1,792 $ 1,752 $ 1,713 Taxable-equivalent adjustment 12 11 9 Net interest income - taxable-equivalent 1,804 1,763 1,722 Provision for credit losses 120 140 125 Noninterest income 740 689 683 Noninterest expense 1,349 1,438 1,336 Net income 818 664 716 Net income available to common shareholders - diluted 781 620 679 Diluted earnings per common share 5.32 4.13 4.24 Return on average assets - annualized 1.51 % 1.26 % 1.37 % Return on average common shareholders' equity - annualized 12.30 9.67 10.39 Average Balance Sheet Total assets $ 216,532 $ 213,828 $ 210,261 Interest-bearing deposits at banks 15,061 16,231 19,698 Investment securities 38,728 37,845 35,335 Loans 141,427 138,423 135,407 Deposits (1) 163,524 164,176 163,258 Borrowings 20,794 16,759 14,263 Selected Ratios (Amounts expressed as a percent, except per share data) Net interest margin (1) 3.70 % 3.70 % 3.62 % Efficiency ratio (2) 52.8 58.3 55.2 Net charge-offs to average total loans - annualized .23 .31 .32 Allowance for loan losses to total loans 1.52 1.53 1.61 Nonaccrual loans to total loans .84 .89 1.16 Common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital ratio (3) 10.19 10.33 10.99 Common shareholders' equity per share $ 176.03 $ 173.82 $ 166.94 (1) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. (2) A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures is included in the tables that accompany this release. (3) CET1 capital ratio at June 30, 2026 is estimated. Financial Highlights Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $41 million in the recent quarter as compared with the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an additional day in the recent quarter, higher interest income on nonaccrual loans and growth in average earning assets. The net interest margin remained at 3.70%. A $3.0 billion increase in average loan balances in the recent quarter spanned all loan categories including $2.3 billion of growth in average commercial and industrial loans. Commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2026 increased $1.1 billion from March 31, 2026. Noninterest income in the recent quarter reflects a higher distribution from M&T's investment in Bayview Lending Group LLC ("BLG"), an increase in trust income and a rise in revenues from interest rate swap agreements entered into for commercial customers. The decline in noninterest expense reflects seasonal salaries and employee benefits expense recognized in the first quarter of 2026. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans declined 1 basis point to 1.52% at June 30, 2026. In the recent quarter, M&T repurchased 2.1 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $465 million. M&T's CET1 capital ratio is estimated to be 10.19% at June 30, 2026. Chief Financial Officer Commentary "M&T generated record earnings per share in the second quarter, reflecting strong contributions from our commercial, retail and institutional services and wealth management businesses. These results reflect the enduring strength of our franchise and the dedication of our employees to making a meaningful difference in the lives of our customers and communities. I want to thank my M&T colleagues. As a result of their commitment, M&T continues to create lasting value for everyone we serve." - Daryl N. Bible, M&T's Chief Financial Officer Contact: Investor Relations: Rajiv Ranjan 716.842.5138 Steve Wendelboe 716.842.5138 Media Relations: Frank Lentini 929.651.0447 Non-GAAP Measures (1) (Dollars in millions, except per share data) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Net operating income $ 823 $ 671 23 % $ 724 14 % Diluted net operating earnings per common share 5.35 4.18 28 4.28 25 Annualized return on average tangible assets 1.59 % 1.33 % 1.44 % Annualized return on average tangible common equity 18.57 14.51 15.54 Efficiency ratio 52.8 58.3 55.2 Tangible equity per common share $ 117.41 $ 115.96 1 $ 112.48 4 (1) A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures is included in the tables that accompany this release. M&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of its results on a "net operating" or "tangible" basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (and the related goodwill and core deposit and other intangible asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and expenses associated with merging acquired operations into M&T (when incurred), since such items are considered by management to be "nonoperating" in nature. Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income (1) (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Average earning assets $ 195,216 $ 192,594 1 % $ 190,535 2 % Average interest-bearing liabilities (2) 140,354 136,388 3 132,368 6 Net interest income - taxable-equivalent 1,804 1,763 2 1,722 5 Yield on average earning assets (2) 5.40 % 5.35 % 5.51 % Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (2) 2.36 2.32 2.71 Net interest spread 3.04 3.03 2.80 Net interest margin (2) 3.70 3.70 3.62 (1) Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Annualized Taxable-equivalent Rates are included in the accompanying table herein. (2) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $41 million, or 2%, compared with the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an additional calendar day, higher interest income from nonaccrual loans and growth in average loans in the recent quarter. Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $82 million, or 5%, as compared with the year-earlier second quarter reflecting growth in average loans and investment securities and favorable earning asset and interest-bearing liability repricing, including an improved impact from interest rate swap agreements. Average Earning Assets (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Interest-bearing deposits at banks $ 15,061 $ 16,231 -7 % $ 19,698 -24 % Investment securities 38,728 37,845 2 35,335 10 Loans (1) Commercial and industrial 66,069 63,804 4 61,036 8 Real estate - commercial 23,553 23,496 — 25,333 -7 Real estate - residential 25,086 24,817 1 23,684 6 Consumer 26,719 26,306 2 25,354 5 Total loans 141,427 138,423 2 135,407 4 Other — 95 -100 95 -100 Total earning assets $ 195,216 $ 192,594 1 $ 190,535 2 (1) Supplemental information on loan balances is included in the accompanying table herein. Average earning assets rose $2.6 billion from the first quarter of 2026 reflecting loan growth and the purchases of investment securities predominantly in the immediately preceding quarter. The increase in average loans reflected broad-based growth in average commercial and industrial loan balances of $2.3 billion and higher average commercial real estate loan balances of $57 million, average residential real estate loan balances of $269 million and average consumer loan balances of $413 million. Average earning assets increased $4.7 billion from the second quarter of 2025. Average interest-bearing deposits at banks decreased $4.6 billion as liquidity was deployed to originate loans and purchase investment securities. The growth in average loans reflected higher average balances of commercial and industrial loans of $5.0 billion, including growth in loans spanning most industry types, residential real estate loans of $1.4 billion and consumer loans of $1.4 billion. Those increases were partially offset by a $1.8 billion decline in average commercial real estate loan balances, reflecting payoffs. Average Interest-bearing Liabilities (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Interest-bearing deposits Savings and interest-checking deposits (1) $ 105,752 $ 106,570 -1 % $ 103,934 2 % Time deposits (1) 13,808 13,059 6 14,171 -3 Total interest-bearing deposits (1) 119,560 119,629 — 118,105 1 Short-term borrowings 8,016 5,695 41 3,327 141 Long-term borrowings 12,778 11,064 15 10,936 17 Total interest-bearing liabilities (1) $ 140,354 $ 136,388 3 $ 132,368 6 (1) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. Average interest-bearing liabilities in the recent quarter rose $4.0 billion from the first quarter of 2026 reflecting an increase in average short-term borrowings from the FHLB of New York and average long-term borrowings from issuances of senior notes and securitizations. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $8.0 billion from the second quarter of 2025 reflecting growth in average savings and interest-checking deposits of $1.8 billion and higher average short-term borrowings from the FHLB of New York and long-term borrowings from issuances of senior notes and securitizations. Provision for Credit Losses/Asset Quality (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 At end of quarter Nonaccrual loans $ 1,208 $ 1,240 -3 % $ 1,573 -23 % Real estate and other foreclosed assets 23 27 -14 30 -25 Total nonperforming assets 1,231 1,267 -3 1,603 -23 Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (1) 603 646 -7 496 22 Nonaccrual loans as % of loans outstanding .84 % .89 % 1.16 % Allowance for loan losses $ 2,176 $ 2,136 2 $ 2,197 -1 Allowance for loan losses as % of loans outstanding 1.52 % 1.53 % 1.61 % Reserve for unfunded credit commitments $ 95 $ 95 — $ 80 19 For the period Provision for loan losses $ 120 $ 125 -4 $ 105 14 Provision for unfunded credit commitments — 15 -100 20 -100 Total provision for credit losses 120 140 -14 125 -4 Net charge-offs 80 105 -23 108 -26 Net charge-offs as % of average loans (annualized) .23 % .31 % .32 % (1) Predominantly government-guaranteed residential real estate loans. The provision for credit losses was $120 million in the second quarter of 2026 as compared with $140 million in the immediately preceding quarter and $125 million in the second quarter of 2025. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans outstanding was 1.52% at June 30, 2026 and 1.53% at March 31, 2026, improved from 1.61% at June 30, 2025. That improvement reflects lower levels of criticized loans. Nonaccrual loans were $1.2 billion at each of June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026, compared with $1.6 billion at June 30, 2025. The lower level of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2026 and March 31, 2026 as compared with June 30, 2025 reflects a decrease in commercial and industrial and commercial real estate nonaccrual loans. Noninterest Income (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Mortgage banking revenues (1) $ 127 $ 127 — % $ 130 -2 % Service charges on deposit accounts 144 139 4 137 4 Trust income 197 183 8 182 9 Brokerage services income 35 35 2 31 13 Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains 22 14 61 12 100 Gain (loss) on bank investment securities 2 4 -57 — — Other revenues from operations (2) 213 187 14 191 12 Total $ 740 $ 689 8 $ 683 8 (1) Supplemental information on mortgage banking activities is included in the accompanying table herein. (2) Supplemental information on other revenues from operations is included in the accompanying table herein. Effective January 1, 2026, the Company elected to prospectively measure its residential mortgage loan servicing right assets at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in mortgage banking revenues. As a result, amortization associated with residential mortgage loan servicing right assets previously recognized in other costs of operations before 2026 is no longer recorded. Instead beginning in 2026, fair value changes in residential mortgage loan servicing right assets, inclusive of the realization of expected net servicing revenues over time, are included in mortgage banking revenues. On December 31, 2025, the Company began economically hedging the risk of fair value changes in these assets through the use of various interest rate derivative contracts, for which changes in fair value are also reflected in mortgage banking revenues. Noninterest income in the second quarter of 2026 increased $51 million, or 8%, from 2026's first quarter. Trust income rose $14 million reflecting higher revenues from the Company's institutional services and wealth management businesses, including seasonal tax service fees. Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains increased $8 million reflecting higher revenues from interest rate swap transactions with commercial customers. Other revenues from operations increased $26 million reflecting a $47 million distribution from M&T's investment in BLG in the recent quarter as compared with $33 million in the first quarter of 2026 and higher merchant discount and credit card fees. Noninterest income rose $57 million, or 8%, as compared with the second quarter of 2025. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $7 million reflecting higher commercial and consumer service charges. Trust income rose $15 million reflecting higher revenues from the Company's institutional services and wealth management businesses. Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains increased $10 million reflecting higher revenues from interest rate swap transactions with commercial customers. Other revenues from operations increased $22 million reflecting a $47 million distribution from M&T's investment in BLG in the recent quarter, partially offset by a $15 million gain on the sale of an out-of-footprint residential builder and developer loan portfolio and a $10 million gain on the sale of a subsidiary that specialized in institutional services each in the second quarter of 2025. Noninterest Expense (Dollars in millions) 2Q26 1Q26 Change 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 2Q25 Change 2Q26 vs. 2Q25 Salaries and employee benefits $ 826 $ 914 -10 % $ 813 2 % Equipment and net occupancy 129 133 -2 130 — Outside data processing and software 154 144 8 138 12 Professional and other services 89 93 -5 86 2 FDIC assessments 18 23 -27 22 -21 Advertising and marketing 27 21 31 25 8 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets 7 9 -26 9 -27 Other costs of operations 99 101 -2 113 -12 Total $ 1,349 $ 1,438 -6 $ 1,336 1 Noninterest expense declined $89 million, or 6%, from the first quarter of 2026. Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased $88 million reflecting seasonally higher stock-based compensation, payroll-related taxes and other employee benefits expense in the first quarter of 2026 and lower average staffing levels in the recent quarter, partially offset by the full-quarter impact of annual merit increases and an additional working day in the recent quarter. Outside data processing and software costs increased $10 million reflecting costs associated with enhancements to the Company's technology infrastructure, cybersecurity and financial recordkeeping and reporting systems. Noninterest expense increased $13 million, or 1%, from the second quarter of 2025. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $13 million reflecting higher salaries expense from annual merit and other increases and a rise in incentive compensation, partially offset by lower staffing levels in the recent quarter. Outside data processing and software costs rose $16 million reflecting costs associated with enhancements to the Company's technology infrastructure, cybersecurity and financial recordkeeping and reporting systems. Other costs of operations decreased $14 million reflecting the amortization associated with residential mortgage loan servicing right assets in the second quarter of 2025, partially offset by higher expense associated with the Company's supplemental executive retirement savings plan. Income Taxes The Company's effective income tax rate was 23.1% in the second quarter of 2026, compared with 23.0% and 23.4% in the first quarter of 2026 and the second quarter of 2025, respectively. Capital and Liquidity 2Q26 1Q26 2Q25 CET1 10.19 % (1) 10.33 % 10.99 % Tier 1 capital 11.64 (1) 11.81 12.50 Total capital 13.72 (1) 13.61 13.96 Tangible capital – common 8.07 8.26 8.67 (1) Capital ratios at June 30, 2026 are estimated. M&T's capital ratios remained well above the minimum set forth by regulatory requirements. Cash dividends declared on M&T's common and preferred stock totaled $220 million and $35 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2026. M&T's current stress capital buffer is 2.7%. M&T repurchased shares of its common stock at a cost of $465 million during the recent quarter, compared with $1.25 billion and $1.08 billion in the first quarter of 2026 and the second quarter of 2025, respectively. The CET1 capital ratio for M&T was estimated at 10.19% as of June 30, 2026. M&T's total risk-weighted assets at June 30, 2026 are estimated to be $167.9 billion. Reflecting loan growth and share repurchase activity in the recent quarter, M&T's tangible common equity to tangible asset ratio at June 30, 2026 decreased 19 basis points from March 31, 2026 and 60 basis points from June 30, 2025. While not subject to the liquidity coverage ratio ("LCR") requirements, M&T estimates that its LCR on June 30, 2026 was 106%, exceeding the regulatory minimum standards that would be applicable if it were a Category III institution subject to the Category III reduced LCR requirements. Conference Call Investors will have an opportunity to listen to M&T's conference call to discuss second quarter financial results today at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Those wishing to participate in the call may dial (800) 347-7315. International participants, using any applicable international calling codes, may dial (785) 424-1755. Callers should reference M&T Bank Corporation or the conference ID #MTBQ226. The conference call will be webcast live through M&T's website at https://ir.mtb.com/news-events/events-presentations. A replay of the call will be available through Wednesday July 22, 2026, by calling (800) 695-2533 or (402) 530-9029 for international participants. No conference ID or passcode is required. The event will also be archived and available by 3:00 p.m. today on M&T's website at https://ir.mtb.com/news-events/events-presentations. About M&T M&T is a financial holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York. M&T's principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, provides banking products and services with a branch and ATM network spanning the eastern U.S. from Maine to Virginia and Washington, D.C. Trust-related services are provided in select markets in the U.S. and abroad by M&T's Wilmington Trust-affiliated companies and by M&T Bank. For more information on M&T Bank, visit www.mtb.com. Forward-Looking Statements This news release and related conference call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Any statement that does not describe historical or current facts is a forward-looking statement, including statements based on current expectations, estimates and projections about M&T's business, and management's beliefs and assumptions. Statements regarding the potential effects of events or factors specific to M&T and/or the financial industry as a whole, as well as national and global events generally, on M&T's business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to the risk that the actual effects may differ, possibly materially, from what is reflected in those forward-looking statements due to factors and future developments that are uncertain, unpredictable and in many cases beyond M&T's control. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "target," "estimate," "continue," or "potential," by future conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may," or by variations of such words or by similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are difficult to predict and may cause actual outcomes to differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted. While there can be no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties is complete, important factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation: economic conditions and growth rates, including inflation and market volatility; events, developments and current conditions in the financial services industry, including trust, brokerage and investment management businesses; changes in interest rates, spreads on earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and interest rate sensitivity; prepayment speeds, loan originations, loan concentrations by type and industry, credit losses and market values on loans, collateral securing loans, and other assets; sources of liquidity; levels of client deposits; ability to contain costs and expenses; changes in M&T's credit ratings; domestic or international political developments and other geopolitical events, including trade and tariff policies and international conflicts and hostilities; changes and trends in the securities markets; common shares outstanding and common stock price volatility; fair value of and number of stock-based compensation awards to be issued in future periods; the impact of changes in market values on trust-, brokerage-, and investment management-related revenues; federal, state or local legislation and/or regulations affecting the financial services industry, or M&T and its subsidiaries individually or collectively, including tax policy; regulatory supervision and oversight, including monetary policy and capital requirements; governmental and public policy changes; political conditions, either nationally or in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business; the initiation and outcome of potential, pending and future litigation, investigations and governmental proceedings, including tax-related examinations and other matters; operational risk events, including loss resulting from fraud by employees or persons outside M&T and breaches in data and cybersecurity; changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, regulatory agencies or legislation; increasing price, product and service competition by competitors, including new entrants; technological developments and changes; the ability to continue to introduce competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis; the mix of products and services; protection and validity of intellectual property rights; reliance on large customers; technological, implementation and cost/financial risks in large, multi-year contracts; continued availability of financing; financial resources in the amounts, at the times and on the terms required to support M&T and its subsidiaries' future businesses; and material differences in the actual financial results of merger, acquisition, divestment and investment activities compared with M&T's initial expectations, including the full realization of anticipated cost savings and revenue enhancements. These are representative of the factors that could affect the outcome of the forward-looking statements. In addition, as noted, such statements could be affected by general industry and market conditions and growth rates, general economic and political conditions, either nationally or in the states in which M&T and its subsidiaries do business, and other factors. M&T provides further detail regarding these risks and uncertainties in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, including in the Risk Factors section of such report, as well as in other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and M&T assumes no duty and does not undertake to update forward-looking statements. Financial Highlights Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions, except per share, shares in thousands) 2026 2025 Change 2026 2025 Change Performance Net income $ 818 $ 716 14 % $ 1,482 $ 1,300 14 % Net income available to common shareholders 781 679 15 1,401 1,226 14 Per common share: Basic earnings 5.35 4.26 26 9.49 7.58 25 Diluted earnings 5.32 4.24 25 9.44 7.55 25 Cash dividends 1.50 1.35 11 3.00 2.70 11 Common shares outstanding: Average - diluted 146,758 160,005 -8 148,424 162,511 -9 Period end 144,933 156,532 -7 144,933 156,532 -7 Return on (annualized): Average total assets 1.51 % 1.37 % 1.39 % 1.25 % Average common shareholders' equity 12.30 10.39 10.98 9.37 Taxable-equivalent net interest income $ 1,804 $ 1,722 5 $ 3,567 $ 3,429 4 Yield on average earning assets (1) 5.40 % 5.51 % 5.38 % 5.51 % Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (1) 2.36 2.71 2.35 2.70 Net interest spread (1) 3.04 2.80 3.03 2.81 Contribution of interest-free funds (1) .66 .82 .67 .83 Net interest margin 3.70 3.62 3.70 3.64 Net charge-offs to average total net loans (annualized) .23 .32 .27 .33 Net operating results (2) Net operating income $ 823 $ 724 14 $ 1,494 $ 1,318 13 Diluted net operating earnings per common share 5.35 4.28 25 9.52 7.66 24 Return on (annualized): Average tangible assets 1.59 % 1.44 % 1.46 % 1.32 % Average tangible common equity 18.57 15.54 16.52 14.03 Efficiency ratio 52.8 55.2 55.5 57.8 At June 30, Loan quality 2026 2025 Change Nonaccrual loans $ 1,208 $ 1,573 -23 % Real estate and other foreclosed assets 23 30 -25 Total nonperforming assets $ 1,231 $ 1,603 -23 Accruing loans past due 90 days or more $ 603 $ 496 22 Government guaranteed loans included in totals above: Nonaccrual loans $ 78 $ 75 4 Accruing loans past due 90 days or more 586 450 30 Nonaccrual loans to total loans .84 % 1.16 % Allowance for loan losses to total loans 1.52 1.61 Additional information Period end common stock price $ 238.01 $ 193.99 23 Full-service domestic banking offices (3) 911 941 -3 Full-time equivalent employees 21,662 22,590 -4 (1) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. (2) Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. Reconciliations of net income with net operating income appear herein. (3) In the first quarter of 2026, thirteen domestic branches formerly classified as full service were designated as limited service per regulatory filings. Financial Highlights, Five Quarter Trend Three Months Ended June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions, except per share, shares in thousands) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Performance Net income $ 818 $ 664 $ 759 $ 792 $ 716 Net income available to common shareholders 781 620 718 754 679 Per common share: Basic earnings 5.35 4.16 4.71 4.85 4.26 Diluted earnings 5.32 4.13 4.67 4.82 4.24 Cash dividends 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.35 Common shares outstanding: Average - diluted 146,758 150,109 153,712 156,553 160,005 Period end 144,933 146,917 151,840 154,518 156,532 Return on (annualized): Average total assets 1.51 % 1.26 % 1.41 % 1.49 % 1.37 % Average common shareholders' equity 12.30 9.67 10.87 11.45 10.39 Taxable-equivalent net interest income $ 1,804 $ 1,763 $ 1,790 $ 1,773 $ 1,722 Yield on average earning assets (1) 5.40 % 5.35 % 5.47 % 5.60 % 5.51 % Cost of interest-bearing liabilities (1) 2.36 2.32 2.52 2.72 2.71 Net interest spread 3.04 3.03 2.95 2.88 2.80 Contribution of interest-free funds (1) .66 .67 .75 .81 .82 Net interest margin (1) 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.62 Net charge-offs to average total net loans (annualized) .23 .31 .54 .42 .32 Net operating results (2) Net operating income $ 823 $ 671 $ 767 $ 798 $ 724 Diluted net operating earnings per common share 5.35 4.18 4.72 4.87 4.28 Return on (annualized): Average tangible assets 1.59 % 1.33 % 1.49 % 1.56 % 1.44 % Average tangible common equity 18.57 14.51 16.24 17.13 15.54 Efficiency ratio 52.8 58.3 55.1 53.6 55.2 June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, Loan quality 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Nonaccrual loans $ 1,208 $ 1,240 $ 1,252 $ 1,512 $ 1,573 Real estate and other foreclosed assets 23 27 35 37 30 Total nonperforming assets $ 1,231 $ 1,267 $ 1,287 $ 1,549 $ 1,603 Accruing loans past due 90 days or more $ 603 $ 646 $ 561 $ 432 $ 496 Government guaranteed loans included in totals above: Nonaccrual loans 78 85 83 71 75 Accruing loans past due 90 days or more 586 634 543 403 450 Nonaccrual loans to total loans .84 % .89 % .90 % 1.10 % 1.16 % Allowance for loan losses to total loans 1.52 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.61 Additional information Period end common stock price $ 238.01 $ 206.72 $ 201.48 $ 197.62 $ 193.99 Full-service domestic banking offices (3) 911 930 942 942 941 Full-time equivalent employees 21,662 21,866 22,080 22,383 22,590 (1) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. (2) Excludes amortization and balances related to goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets and merger-related expenses which, except in the calculation of the efficiency ratio, are net of applicable income tax effects. Reconciliations of net income with net operating income appear herein. (3) In the first quarter of 2026, thirteen domestic branches formerly classified as full service were designated as limited service per regulatory filings. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2025 Change 2026 2025 Change Interest income $ 2,620 $ 2,609 — % $ 5,156 $ 5,169 — % Interest expense 828 896 -8 1,612 1,761 -8 Net interest income 1,792 1,713 5 3,544 3,408 4 Provision for credit losses 120 125 -4 260 255 2 Net interest income after provision for credit losses 1,672 1,588 5 3,284 3,153 4 Other income Mortgage banking revenues 127 130 -2 254 248 2 Service charges on deposit accounts 144 137 4 283 270 5 Trust income 197 182 9 380 359 6 Brokerage services income 35 31 13 70 63 11 Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains 22 12 100 36 21 74 Gain (loss) on bank investment securities 2 — — 6 — — Other revenues from operations 213 191 12 400 333 20 Total other income 740 683 8 1,429 1,294 10 Other expense Salaries and employee benefits 826 813 2 1,740 1,700 2 Equipment and net occupancy 129 130 — 262 262 — Outside data processing and software 154 138 12 298 274 9 Professional and other services 89 86 2 182 170 7 FDIC assessments 18 22 -21 41 45 -10 Advertising and marketing 27 25 8 48 47 1 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets 7 9 -27 16 22 -27 Other costs of operations 99 113 -12 200 231 -13 Total other expense 1,349 1,336 1 2,787 2,751 1 Income before taxes 1,063 935 14 1,926 1,696 14 Income taxes 245 219 12 444 396 12 Net income $ 818 $ 716 14 % $ 1,482 $ 1,300 14 % Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, Five Quarter Trend Three Months Ended June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Interest income $ 2,620 $ 2,536 $ 2,637 $ 2,680 $ 2,609 Interest expense 828 784 858 919 896 Net interest income 1,792 1,752 1,779 1,761 1,713 Provision for credit losses 120 140 125 125 125 Net interest income after provision for credit losses 1,672 1,612 1,654 1,636 1,588 Other income Mortgage banking revenues 127 127 155 147 130 Service charges on deposit accounts 144 139 140 141 137 Trust income 197 183 184 181 182 Brokerage services income 35 35 34 34 31 Trading account and other non-hedging derivative gains 22 14 19 18 12 Gain (loss) on bank investment securities 2 4 1 1 — Other revenues from operations 213 187 163 230 191 Total other income 740 689 696 752 683 Other expense Salaries and employee benefits 826 914 809 833 813 Equipment and net occupancy 129 133 134 129 130 Outside data processing and software 154 144 146 138 138 Professional and other services 89 93 105 81 86 FDIC assessments 18 23 (8) 13 22 Advertising and marketing 27 21 32 23 25 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets 7 9 10 10 9 Other costs of operations 99 101 151 136 113 Total other expense 1,349 1,438 1,379 1,363 1,336 Income before taxes 1,063 863 971 1,025 935 Income taxes 245 199 212 233 219 Net income $ 818 $ 664 $ 759 $ 792 $ 716 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2025 Change ASSETS Cash and due from banks $ 1,939 $ 2,128 -9 % Interest-bearing deposits at banks 15,499 19,297 -20 Investment securities 38,374 35,568 8 Loans: Commercial and industrial 66,143 61,660 7 Real estate - commercial 24,492 24,567 — Real estate - residential 25,384 24,117 5 Consumer 27,174 25,772 5 Total loans 143,193 136,116 5 Less: allowance for loan losses 2,176 2,197 -1 Net loans 141,017 133,919 5 Goodwill 8,465 8,465 — Core deposit and other intangible assets 48 84 -43 Other assets 13,919 12,123 15 Total assets $ 219,261 $ 211,584 4 % LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 48,295 $ 47,485 2 % Interest-bearing deposits 120,590 116,968 3 Total deposits 168,885 164,453 3 Short-term borrowings 4,614 2,071 123 Long-term borrowings 13,568 12,380 10 Accrued interest and other liabilities 4,248 4,155 2 Total liabilities 191,315 183,059 5 Shareholders' equity: Preferred 2,434 2,394 2 Common 25,512 26,131 -2 Total shareholders' equity 27,946 28,525 -2 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 219,261 $ 211,584 4 % Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, Five Quarter Trend June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 ASSETS Cash and due from banks $ 1,939 $ 1,903 $ 1,701 $ 1,950 $ 2,128 Interest-bearing deposits at banks 15,499 14,445 17,068 16,751 19,297 Investment securities 38,374 38,621 36,649 36,864 35,568 Loans: Commercial and industrial 66,143 65,391 63,548 61,887 61,660 Real estate - commercial 24,492 23,345 23,819 24,046 24,567 Real estate - residential 25,384 24,857 24,874 24,662 24,117 Consumer 27,174 26,321 26,461 26,379 25,772 Total loans 143,193 139,914 138,702 136,974 136,116 Less: allowance for loan losses 2,176 2,136 2,116 2,161 2,197 Net loans 141,017 137,778 136,586 134,813 133,919 Goodwill 8,465 8,465 8,465 8,465 8,465 Core deposit and other intangible assets 48 55 64 74 84 Other assets 13,919 13,469 12,977 12,360 12,123 Total assets $ 219,261 $ 214,736 $ 213,510 $ 211,277 $ 211,584 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Noninterest-bearing deposits $ 48,295 $ 45,892 $ 46,509 $ 44,994 $ 47,485 Interest-bearing deposits 120,590 117,849 120,400 118,432 116,968 Total deposits 168,885 163,741 166,909 163,426 164,453 Short-term borrowings 4,614 7,851 2,149 2,059 2,071 Long-term borrowings 13,568 11,175 10,911 12,928 12,380 Accrued interest and other liabilities 4,248 3,997 4,364 4,136 4,155 Total liabilities 191,315 186,764 184,333 182,549 183,059 Shareholders' equity: Preferred 2,434 2,434 2,834 2,394 2,394 Common 25,512 25,538 26,343 26,334 26,131 Total shareholders' equity 27,946 27,972 29,177 28,728 28,525 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 219,261 $ 214,736 $ 213,510 $ 211,277 $ 211,584 Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheet and Annualized Taxable-equivalent Rates Three Months Ended Change in Balance Six Months Ended June 30, March 31, June 30, June 30, 2026 from June 30, Change 2026 2026 2025 March 31, June 30, 2026 2025 in (Dollars in millions) Balance Rate Balance Rate Balance Rate 2026 2025 Balance Rate Balance Rate Balance ASSETS Interest-bearing deposits at banks $ 15,061 3.72 % $ 16,231 3.71 % $ 19,698 4.47 % -7 % -24 % $ 15,642 3.72 % $ 19,697 4.48 % -21 % Investment securities (1) (2) 38,728 4.29 37,845 4.22 35,335 3.80 2 10 38,289 4.25 34,909 3.88 10 Loans: Commercial and industrial 66,069 6.00 63,804 6.00 61,036 6.40 4 8 64,942 6.00 61,046 6.38 6 Real estate - commercial (1) 23,553 6.27 23,496 6.11 25,333 6.40 — -7 23,525 6.19 25,794 6.32 -9 Real estate - residential 25,086 4.64 24,817 4.56 23,684 4.52 1 6 24,952 4.60 23,431 4.48 6 Consumer 26,719 6.46 26,306 6.48 25,354 6.57 2 5 26,514 6.47 24,856 6.57 7 Total loans (1) 141,427 5.89 138,423 5.85 135,407 6.10 2 4 139,933 5.87 135,127 6.08 4 Other (1) — — 95 3.49 95 3.47 -100 -100 47 — 96 3.47 -51 Total earning assets (1) 195,216 5.40 192,594 5.35 190,535 5.51 1 2 193,911 5.38 189,829 5.51 2 Goodwill 8,465 8,465 8,465 — — 8,465 8,465 — Core deposit and other intangible assets 51 59 89 -13 -42 55 90 -39 Other assets 12,800 12,710 11,172 1 15 12,755 10,912 17 Total assets $ 216,532 $ 213,828 $ 210,261 1 % 3 % $ 215,186 $ 209,296 3 % LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Interest-bearing deposits Savings and interest-checking deposits (1) $ 105,752 1.81 % $ 106,570 1.84 % $ 103,934 2.24 % -1 % 2 % $ 106,159 1.82 % $ 102,741 2.22 % 3 % Time deposits (1) 13,808 3.02 13,059 3.02 14,171 3.48 6 -3 13,435 3.02 14,140 3.52 -5 Total interest-bearing deposits (1) 119,560 1.95 119,629 1.97 118,105 2.39 — 1 119,594 1.96 116,881 2.38 2 Short-term borrowings 8,016 3.86 5,695 3.86 3,327 4.49 41 141 6,862 3.86 3,100 4.51 121 Long-term borrowings (1) 12,778 5.33 11,064 5.41 10,936 5.70 15 17 11,926 5.37 11,109 5.64 7 Total interest-bearing liabilities (1) 140,354 2.36 136,388 2.32 132,368 2.71 3 6 138,382 2.35 131,090 2.70 6 Noninterest-bearing deposits 43,964 44,547 45,153 -1 -3 44,254 45,294 -2 Other liabilities (1) 4,275 4,245 4,074 1 5 4,259 4,081 4 Total liabilities 188,593 185,180 181,595 2 4 186,895 180,465 4 Shareholders' equity 27,939 28,648 28,666 -2 -3 28,291 28,831 -2 Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 216,532 $ 213,828 $ 210,261 1 % 3 % $ 215,186 $ 209,296 3 % Net interest spread (1) 3.04 3.03 2.80 3.03 2.81 Contribution of interest-free funds (1) .66 .67 .82 .67 .83 Net interest margin (1) 3.70 % 3.70 % 3.62 % 3.70 % 3.64 % (1) In conjunction with the implementation of a new general ledger platform during the second quarter of 2026, the Company modified its methodology for calculating annualized taxable-equivalent rates for certain earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including certain average deposit balances. Previously reported amounts have been adjusted to conform to the current presentation. (2) Yields on investment securities for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2025 reflect $20 million and $18 million, respectively, of lower taxable-equivalent interest income resulting from an alignment of amortization periods for certain municipal bonds obtained from the acquisition of People's United Financial, Inc. Supplemental Information - Loan Balances June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Commercial and industrial Commercial and industrial excluding owner-occupied real estate by industry: Financial and insurance $ 13,852 $ 13,545 $ 12,794 $ 12,084 $ 12,138 Services 8,559 8,235 7,910 7,689 7,646 Motor vehicle and recreational finance dealers 6,972 7,069 7,191 6,637 6,502 Manufacturing 6,407 6,424 6,112 6,241 6,189 Wholesale 4,343 4,359 4,386 4,246 4,246 Transportation, communications, utilities 4,208 3,937 3,890 3,755 3,807 Retail 3,330 3,316 3,098 3,114 3,079 Construction 2,450 2,311 2,265 2,206 2,275 Health services 1,712 1,841 1,822 1,780 1,879 Real estate investors 1,526 1,668 1,579 1,506 1,314 Other 1,400 1,365 1,303 1,568 1,377 Total commercial and industrial excluding owner-occupied real estate 54,759 54,070 52,350 50,826 50,452 Owner-occupied real estate by industry: Services 2,362 2,377 2,368 2,308 2,402 Motor vehicle and recreational finance dealers 2,180 2,217 2,234 2,162 2,239 Retail 1,926 1,916 1,893 1,825 1,808 Health services 1,464 1,335 1,268 1,320 1,313 Wholesale 1,035 1,029 978 975 951 Manufacturing 712 727 791 783 785 Real estate investors 607 617 616 634 630 Other 1,098 1,103 1,050 1,054 1,080 Total owner-occupied real estate 11,384 11,321 11,198 11,061 11,208 Total commercial and industrial 66,143 65,391 63,548 61,887 61,660 Commercial real estate Permanent finance by property type: Apartments/Multifamily 7,124 6,628 6,837 6,548 6,082 Retail/Service 4,259 4,237 4,164 4,320 4,435 Industrial/Warehouse 3,276 2,462 2,297 2,175 2,098 Office 3,147 3,282 3,423 3,487 3,720 Hotel 1,665 1,727 1,743 1,776 1,889 Health Services 1,583 1,507 1,548 1,554 1,669 Other 180 187 180 202 262 Total permanent 21,234 20,030 20,192 20,062 20,155 Construction/Development 3,258 3,315 3,627 3,984 4,412 Total commercial real estate 24,492 23,345 23,819 24,046 24,567 Residential real estate Residential real estate 25,384 24,857 24,874 24,662 24,117 Consumer Home equity lines and loans 4,891 4,796 4,807 4,730 4,634 Recreational finance 14,856 14,144 14,092 14,152 13,666 Automobile 4,969 5,016 5,167 5,223 5,260 Other 2,458 2,365 2,395 2,274 2,212 Total consumer 27,174 26,321 26,461 26,379 25,772 Total loans $ 143,193 $ 139,914 $ 138,702 $ 136,974 $ 136,116 Supplemental Information - Mortgage Banking Activities Three Months Ended Change Six Months Ended Change June 30, March 31, June 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 Amount % 2026 2025 Amount % Residential mortgage banking revenues Gains on loans originated for sale $ 7 $ 8 $ (1) -9 % $ 15 $ 14 $ 1 5 % Loan servicing: Loan servicing fees 33 32 1 2 65 70 (5) -6 Changes in fair value of mortgage loan servicing right assets, net of hedging activities (11) (13) 2 15 (24) — (24) — Loan sub-servicing and other fees 67 62 5 9 129 95 34 35 Total loan servicing 89 81 8 10 170 165 5 3 Total residential mortgage banking revenues $ 96 $ 89 $ 7 8 % $ 185 $ 179 $ 6 3 % New commitments to originate loans for sale $ 411 $ 400 $ 11 3 % $ 811 $ 612 $ 199 33 % June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Balances at period end Loans held for sale $ 256 $ 327 $ 441 $ 327 $ 222 Commitments to originate loans for sale 258 222 224 329 248 Commitments to sell loans 467 544 645 576 407 Capitalized mortgage loan servicing assets 540 542 287 305 326 Loans serviced for others 35,253 35,586 35,873 36,421 36,952 Loans sub-serviced for others 183,599 123,968 156,938 161,785 157,608 Total loans serviced for others $ 218,852 $ 159,554 $ 192,811 $ 198,206 $ 194,560 Three Months Ended Change Six Months Ended Change June 30, March 31, June 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 Amount % 2026 2025 Amount % Commercial mortgage banking revenues Gains on loans originated for sale $ 13 $ 18 $ (5) -28 % $ 31 $ 30 $ 1 3 % Loan servicing fees and other 18 20 (2) -11 38 39 (1) — Total commercial mortgage banking revenues $ 31 $ 38 $ (7) -19 % $ 69 $ 69 $ — 1 % Loans originated for sale to other investors $ 746 $ 1,135 $ (389) -34 % $ 1,881 $ 2,087 $ (206) -10 % June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Balances at period end Loans held for sale $ 259 $ 359 $ 484 $ 278 $ 361 Commitments to originate loans for sale 485 529 773 1,074 659 Commitments to sell loans 740 903 1,253 1,292 1,017 Capitalized mortgage loan servicing assets 136 138 132 123 124 Loans serviced for others 31,368 30,934 30,309 28,957 28,416 Loans sub-serviced for others 4,072 4,194 4,231 4,297 4,209 Total loans serviced for others $ 35,440 $ 35,128 $ 34,540 $ 33,254 $ 32,625 Supplemental Information - Other Revenues from Operations Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, March 31, Change June 30, June 30, Change (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 Amount % 2026 2025 Amount % Letter of credit and other credit-related fees $ 55 $ 54 $ 1 — % $ 109 $ 107 $ 2 2 % Merchant discount and credit card fees 47 41 6 17 88 89 (1) -2 Bank owned life insurance revenue 20 18 2 5 38 35 3 8 Equipment operating lease income 11 11 — 1 22 25 (3) -12 BLG income 47 33 14 43 80 — 80 — Other 33 30 3 11 63 77 (14) -17 Total other revenues from operations $ 213 $ 187 $ 26 14 % $ 400 $ 333 $ 67 20 % Three Months Ended June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 Letter of credit and other credit-related fees $ 55 $ 54 $ 57 $ 55 $ 58 Merchant discount and credit card fees 47 41 46 51 50 Bank owned life insurance revenue 20 18 19 21 17 Equipment operating lease income 11 11 11 12 14 BLG income 47 33 — 20 — Other 33 30 30 71 52 Total other revenues from operations $ 213 $ 187 $ 163 $ 230 $ 191 Supplemental Information - Interest Rate Swap Agreements (Dollars in billions) June 30, 2026 September 30, 2026 December 31, 2026 March 31, 2027 June 30, 2027 September 30, 2027 December 31, 2027 Fair value hedges: Active $ 6.1 $ 6.1 $ 6.1 $ 6.1 $ 6.1 $ 5.1 $ 5.1 Cash flow hedges: Active 16.0 13.7 14.5 14.0 12.7 10.7 9.6 Forward-starting 10.2 5.0 4.2 2.0 — — — Fair value hedges - weighted-average fixed rate: Active 3.56 % 3.56 % 3.56 % 3.56 % 3.56 % 3.66 % 3.66 % Cash flow hedges - weighted-average fixed rate: Active 3.82 3.62 3.62 3.60 3.64 3.63 3.57 Forward-starting 3.52 3.64 3.65 3.91 — — — Reconciliation of Quarterly GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 (Dollars in millions, except per share) Income statement data Net income Net income $ 818 $ 716 $ 1,482 $ 1,300 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1) 5 8 12 18 Net operating income $ 823 $ 724 $ 1,494 $ 1,318 Earnings per common share Diluted earnings per common share $ 5.32 $ 4.24 $ 9.44 $ 7.55 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1) .03 .04 .08 .11 Diluted net operating earnings per common share $ 5.35 $ 4.28 $ 9.52 $ 7.66 Other expense Other expense $ 1,349 $ 1,336 $ 2,787 $ 2,751 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (7) (9) (16) (22) Noninterest operating expense $ 1,342 $ 1,327 $ 2,771 $ 2,729 Efficiency ratio Noninterest operating expense (numerator) $ 1,342 $ 1,327 $ 2,771 $ 2,729 Taxable-equivalent net interest income $ 1,804 $ 1,722 $ 3,567 $ 3,429 Other income 740 683 1,429 1,294 Less: Gain (loss) on bank investment securities 2 — 6 — Denominator $ 2,542 $ 2,405 $ 4,990 $ 4,723 Efficiency ratio 52.8 % 55.2 % 55.5 % 57.8 % Balance sheet data Average assets Average assets $ 216,532 $ 210,261 $ 215,186 $ 209,296 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (51) (89) (55) (90) Deferred taxes 17 26 18 26 Average tangible assets $ 208,033 $ 201,733 $ 206,684 $ 200,767 Average common equity Average total equity $ 27,939 $ 28,666 $ 28,291 $ 28,831 Preferred stock (2,434) (2,394) (2,505) (2,394) Average common equity 25,505 26,272 25,786 26,437 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (51) (89) (55) (90) Deferred taxes 17 26 18 26 Average tangible common equity $ 17,006 $ 17,744 $ 17,284 $ 17,908 At end of quarter Total assets Total assets $ 219,261 $ 211,584 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (48) (84) Deferred taxes 17 25 Total tangible assets $ 210,765 $ 203,060 Total common equity Total equity $ 27,946 $ 28,525 Preferred stock (2,434) (2,394) Common equity 25,512 26,131 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (48) (84) Deferred taxes 17 25 Total tangible common equity $ 17,016 $ 17,607 (1) After any related tax effect. Reconciliation of Quarterly GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures, Five Quarter Trend Three Months Ended June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30, 2026 2026 2025 2025 2025 (Dollars in millions, except per share) Income statement data Net income Net income $ 818 $ 664 $ 759 $ 792 $ 716 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1) 5 7 8 6 8 Net operating income $ 823 $ 671 $ 767 $ 798 $ 724 Earnings per common share Diluted earnings per common share $ 5.32 $ 4.13 $ 4.67 $ 4.82 $ 4.24 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (1) .03 .05 .05 .05 .04 Diluted net operating earnings per common share $ 5.35 $ 4.18 $ 4.72 $ 4.87 $ 4.28 Other expense Other expense $ 1,349 $ 1,438 $ 1,379 $ 1,363 $ 1,336 Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (7) (9) (10) (10) (9) Noninterest operating expense $ 1,342 $ 1,429 $ 1,369 $ 1,353 $ 1,327 Efficiency ratio Noninterest operating expense (numerator) $ 1,342 $ 1,429 $ 1,369 $ 1,353 $ 1,327 Taxable-equivalent net interest income $ 1,804 $ 1,763 $ 1,790 $ 1,773 $ 1,722 Other income 740 689 696 752 683 Less: Gain (loss) on bank investment securities 2 4 1 1 — Denominator $ 2,542 $ 2,448 $ 2,485 $ 2,524 $ 2,405 Efficiency ratio 52.8 % 58.3 % 55.1 % 53.6 % 55.2 % Balance sheet data Average assets Average assets $ 216,532 $ 213,828 $ 212,891 $ 211,053 $ 210,261 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (51) (59) (69) (79) (89) Deferred taxes 17 19 22 24 26 Average tangible assets $ 208,033 $ 205,323 $ 204,379 $ 202,533 $ 201,733 Average common equity Average total equity $ 27,939 $ 28,648 $ 28,970 $ 28,583 $ 28,666 Preferred stock (2,434) (2,576) (2,691) (2,394) (2,394) Average common equity 25,505 26,072 26,279 26,189 26,272 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (51) (59) (69) (79) (89) Deferred taxes 17 19 22 24 26 Average tangible common equity $ 17,006 $ 17,567 $ 17,767 $ 17,669 $ 17,744 At end of quarter Total assets Total assets $ 219,261 $ 214,736 $ 213,510 $ 211,277 $ 211,584 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (48) (55) (64) (74) (84) Deferred taxes 17 18 20 23 25 Total tangible assets $ 210,765 $ 206,234 $ 205,001 $ 202,761 $ 203,060 Total common equity Total equity $ 27,946 $ 27,972 $ 29,177 $ 28,728 $ 28,525 Preferred stock (2,434) (2,434) (2,834) (2,394) (2,394) Common equity 25,512 25,538 26,343 26,334 26,131 Goodwill (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) (8,465) Core deposit and other intangible assets (48) (55) (64) (74) (84) Deferred taxes 17 18 20 23 25 Total tangible common equity $ 17,016 $ 17,036 $ 17,834 $ 17,818 $ 17,607 (1) After any related tax effect. SOURCE M&T Bank Corporation |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:28
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:37
26d ago
|
M&T Bank's second-quarter profit lifted by interest income growth | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
M&T Bank posted a rise in second-quarter profit on Wednesday, driven by higher interest income and trust income. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:27
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:23
26d ago
|
Molson Coors: Buying This 15% FCF Yield Underpinned By A Strong Balance Sheet | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Molson Coors is currently facing a challenging operating environment created by a double whammy of declining volumes and rising input costs. The company has been able to mitigate most of the volume declines by raising prices and benefiting from a favourable mix shift towards more premium brands. To gain better control of its operating expenses, TAP also announced a large restructuring plan last February, targeting $450 million of cost savings over the next three years. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:27
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:36
26d ago
|
BNY lifts 2026 revenue forecast above estimates after record second quarter | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
BNY raised its 2026 revenue forecast above Wall Street expectations on Wednesday after posting record second-quarter revenue, driven by higher interest income, fees and rising equity markets that boosted the value of client assets. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:27
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:57
26d ago
|
Bank of New York Mellon Profit Jumps on Higher Fee Revenue, Interest Income | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The bank posted second-quarte net income of $1.7 billion, or $2.45 a share, up from $1.39 billion, or $1.93 a share, in the same quarter a year earlier. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:26
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:55
26d ago
|
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. to Announce Second Quarter 2026 Results and Host Earnings Webcast | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
LEAWOOD, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $AMC--AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AMC) (“AMC” or “the Company”), the largest theatrical exhibition company in the world, announced today that it will report its results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2026, on Monday, July 20, 2026.The Company will host an earnings webcast, pre-market, accessible through the Investor Relations section of AMC's website at investor.amctheatres.com/. During the webcast the company will take questions from both equity rese. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:25
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$Z, $ZG Investor Loss Alert: Zillow Investors may have been Misled Anticompetitive Agreement Announcement Leads to 17% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:Z, ZG) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drops resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in Zillow, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zillow-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the Zillow ($Z, $ZG) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 10, 2026Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Zillow’s allegedly anticompetitive agreement with Redfin CorporationLargest Alleged Stock Drop: February 11, 2026 – 16.54% Stock Drop on Class C shares; 17.13% Stock Drop on Class A shares.Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of WashingtonAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Investors have until August 10, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Zillow Class C and Class A common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. It is captioned Breidert v. Zillow Group, Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-02016. Why is Zillow Being Sued for Securities Fraud? On February 6, 2025, Zillow entered into an agreement with Redfin through which Zillow became the exclusive provider of multifamily rental listings on Redfin’s platform and affiliate websites, including Rent.com. According to the complaint, during the relevant period, Zillow characterized the agreement with Redfin as a “partnership” that would provide Zillow exclusive access to Redfin’s advertising platform. As alleged, in truth, under the terms of the agreement, Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing with Zillow, facilitate the transition of its multifamily rental advertising business to Zillow, and close the remainder of its business. Why did Zillow’s Stock Drop? On September 30, 2025, the FTC filed a complaint against Zillow and Redfin alleging violations of the federal antitrust laws. According to the FTC complaint, “Zillow and Redfin executed an unlawful agreement to remove competition from [the online rental marketplaces industry], starting with a $100 million payment to Redfin to exit the [Internet Listing Services] market.” In sum, the FTC alleged, “[t]his agreement is nothing more than an end run around competition on the merits with Redfin for customers…” This news caused the price of Zillow’s Class C and A common stock to decline 4.33% and 4.5%, respectively. On February 10, 2026, Zillow’s CFO told investors that Zillow experienced increased legal expenses which “will result in approximately 200 basis points headwind to EBITDA margins in Q1.” On this news, the price of Zillow’s Class C and A common stock declined 16.54%, and 17.13%, respectively. Finally, on May 7, 2026, Reuters reported that a “federal judge rejected [Zillow and Redfin’s] request to end a [FTC] lawsuit accusing them of illegally agreeing to suppress competition for online apartment rental listings.” This news caused the price of Zillow’s Class C and A common stock to decline 1.9% and 1.76%, respectively. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zillow-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Zillow, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zillow-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zillow-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:24
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
RTX's Pratt & Whitney advances engine inspections with AI-powered technology | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Enhanced borescope analytics will strengthen global MRO operations for commercial and military engines, /PRNewswire/ -- Pratt & Whitney, an RTX (NYSE: RTX) business, is expanding its engine inspection capabilities with AI-assisted borescope software through the acquisition and integration of Amsterdam-based Aiir Innovations. This technology enables a step change in how inspections are performed, enhancing consistency and efficiency across global maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) operations for commercial, civil and military engines. "Broadening the integration of AI-assisted inspection capability strengthens our ability to detect issues earlier, improve turnaround times, increase time on wing and reduce operational disruption for our customers," said Rob Griffiths, senior vice president, Commercial Engines Operations at Pratt & Whitney. "It will fundamentally reshape how engines and components are inspected, maintained and supported throughout their lifecycle, as we increase its application across Pratt & Whitney." The software assists inspectors by applying artificial intelligence to borescope video to deliver faster, more repeatable assessments. It has already been rolled out to commercial customers and MRO providers, significantly reducing inspection times. Pratt & Whitney has applied the technology on the V2500 engine and recently completed pilots on the GTF and F135 engines, with plans to expand its use across the company. By adapting to inspector feedback to enhance classification performance over time, the technology becomes smarter, more accurate and increasingly aligned with real-world expertise. It also enables configurable reporting capabilities, allowing processes that once required substantial time to be completed in minutes with greater quality, consistency, traceability and accuracy. About Pratt & Whitney Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a world leader in the design, manufacture and service of aircraft engines and auxiliary power units for military, commercial and civil aviation customers. Since 1925, our engineers have pioneered the development of revolutionary aircraft propulsion technologies, and today we support more than 90,000 in-service engines through our global network of maintenance, repair and overhaul facilities. About RTX With more than 180,000 global employees, we push the limits of technology and science to redefine how we connect and protect our world. With industry-leading capabilities, we advance aviation, engineer integrated defense systems for operational success, and develop next-generation technology solutions and manufacturing to help global customers address their most critical challenges. The company, with 2025 sales of more than $88 billion, is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. For questions or to schedule an interview, please contact [email protected]. SOURCE RTX |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:24
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 07:05
26d ago
|
Morgan Stanley is set to report second-quarter earnings — here's what the Street expects | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Morgan Stanley is set to report second-quarter earnings before the opening bell Wednesday. Here's what Wall Street expects: Earnings per share: $2.94, according to LSEGRevenue: $19.64 billion, according to LSEGInvestment banking: $2.17 billion, according to StreetAccountTrading: Equities of $4.41 billion, fixed income of $2.49 billion, according to StreetAccount Morgan Stanley is expected to benefit from higher trading and investment banking revenue in the quarter, as rivals JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have shown in their reports. Heightened activity fueled by the global artificial intelligence boom propelled JPMorgan and Goldman to beat estimates for equities trading by a combined $4.4 billion, while investment banking at the two firms topped estimates by a combined $1 billion. Analysts will want to know what CEO Ted Pick has to say on the outlook for the rest of the year as geopolitical tensions remain high. This story is developing. Please check back for updates. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:24
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$INTU Investor Loss Alert: Intuit Investors may have been Misled after Pricing Issues Lead to 20% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU) and certain of the company’s senior executives for securities fraud after significant stock drops resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in Intuit, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/intuit-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the Intuit ($INTU) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 8, 2026Class Action Allegations: Securities fraud alleging that Intuit misled investors regarding TurboTax’s purported competitive advantages and growth prospectsLargest Alleged Stock Drop: May 21, 2026 – 20.02% Stock Drop Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Investors have until September 8, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Intuit securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It is captioned Baldwin v. Intuit Inc., et al., No. 26-cv-7086. Why is Intuit Being Sued for Securities Fraud? Intuit is a financial technology platform that serves consumers, small and mid-market businesses, and accountants through its offerings, which include TurboTax, Credit Karma, and QuickBooks. During the relevant period, Intuit told investors it had significant “momentum” across its business segments, including TurboTax. Intuit attributed its “momentum” to purportedly significant competitive advantages, including integration of AI in its business and operations. Intuit also told investors that the 2026 tax season was “off to a strong start” as the company was poised to deliver the “best price for our customers.” In truth, as alleged, the company was facing pressure among the most price-sensitive DIY tax filers and was not competitive on price in this segment. Why did Intuit’s Stock Drop? On May 20, 2026, before market hours, Reuters published an article titled “Intuit to cut 17% of global jobs to streamline operations, memo shows.” Reuters reported that Intuit was “laying off about 17% of its workforce” and was “winding down its Reno and Woodland Hills offices as part of a strategic restructuring to consolidate teams[.]” This news caused the price of Intuit stock to decline $15.78 per share, or 3.95%, from a closing price of $399.71 per share on May 19, 2026, to $383.93 per share on May 20, 2026. Also on May 20, 2026, after market hours, Intuit released its fiscal Q3 2026 financial results, which included its 2026 tax season revenue. Intuit stated that it “did not have the overall tax season we expected” and that it “faced pressure among the most price-sensitive DIY filers.” Intuit stated that “[w]e [lost] on price.” Intuit also announced that TurboTax online paying units were expected to grow by only 2% as total IRS filers were expected to decline by approx. 30 basis points, representing the “most significant industry-wide contraction since the post-COVID tax season.” This news caused the price of Intuit stock to decline $76.86 per share, or 20.02%, from a closing price of $383.93 per share on May 20, 2026, to $307.07 per share on May 21, 2026. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/intuit-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Intuit, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/intuit-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/intuit-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:18
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:46
26d ago
|
Zacks Industry Outlook BYD, NIO and Yamaha | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
For Immediate ReleaseChicago, IL – July 15, 2026 – Today, Zacks Equity Research BYD Co Ltd (BYDDY - Free Report) , NIO Inc. (NIO - Free Report) and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (YMHAY - Free Report)Industry: Foreign Auto Link: https://www.zacks.com/commentary/2952884/3-foreign-auto-stocks-to-buy-despite-global-demand-headwinds The Zacks Automotive – Foreign industry is likely to remain challenging in the coming months. China's domestic auto demand continues to weaken despite strong export growth, while Europe's automakers face shrinking profits amid intense competition from Chinese rivals and slowing sales momentum. In Japan, recent sales gains have been supported by new model launches and tax incentives, but underlying demand remains weak due to economic pressures and cautious consumer spending. Overall, global automakers are expected to operate in a mixed demand environment with persistent competitive and macroeconomic headwinds. Despite this backdrop, a few stocks like BYD Co Ltd, NIO Inc. and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. stand tall thanks to their strategic initiatives. Industry OverviewCompanies in the Zacks Automotive – Foreign industry are involved in the design, manufacture and sale of vehicles, components and production systems. The industry is highly dependent on business cycles and overall economic conditions. China, Japan, Germany and India are among the leading automotive manufacturing countries. The widespread adoption of advanced technologies is reshaping the industry, while stricter emission and fuel-efficiency norms, expanding charging infrastructure and supportive government policies are driving the adoption of green vehicles. As automakers intensify their electrification efforts, competition continues to increase. Companies are also investing heavily in the research and development of electric and autonomous vehicles, fuel-efficient technologies and low-emission solutions. Key Investing ThemesChina Auto Sales Remain Weak: China's auto market continues to face pressure as weak consumer spending and a slowing economy weigh on domestic vehicle demand. Passenger vehicle sales declined for the ninth straight month in June, with first-half domestic sales falling 20.4% year over year to 8.8 million units, per China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), as cited in Reuters. The slowdown has been particularly severe in the entry-level segment after government subsidies for lower-priced vehicles were reduced, hurting demand for both gasoline and electric models. To offset the weakness at home, Chinese automakers are increasingly relying on overseas markets, with vehicle exports surging 70.6% during the first half of the year. CPCA expects China's domestic auto sales to decline around 11% for the full year, highlighting the challenging demand environment. Europe Auto Market Faces Profit Pressure: Europe's auto market posted a stronger-than-expected start to 2026, with vehicle sales rising nearly 6% in the first half, per GlobalData, as cited in Forbes. However, the sales growth has not translated into higher profitability for automakers. Intense competition from Chinese manufacturers, which benefit from lower production costs and stronger software capabilities, is forcing European companies to offer steep discounts, particularly on electric vehicles. As a result, several major automakers have lowered profit forecasts or reduced production. Sales momentum is expected to weaken in the second half, with full-year growth projected to slow to around 1% or even turn negative. Rising geopolitical uncertainties and cautious consumer spending are likely to keep pressure on the European auto industry. Japan Auto Demand Outlook Remains Soft: Japan's auto market recorded modest growth in the first half of 2026, with new vehicle sales rising 1.8% year over year, per Japan Automobile Dealers Association as cited in the Mainichi Japan. This was supported by a series of new model launches and the removal of the Environmental Performance Tax in April. June sales were particularly strong, increasing 8.6% from a year earlier. Despite the improvement, the broader demand outlook remains weak. Slow economic growth, higher interest rates, rising living costs, and cautious consumer spending continue to weigh on vehicle purchases. As a result, industry forecasts remain subdued, with GlobalData expecting Japan's light vehicle sales to decline by more than 2% in 2026. Zacks Industry Rank DiscouragingThe Zacks Automotive – Foreign industry within the broader Zacks Auto-Tires-Trucks sector currently carries a Zacks Industry Rank #202, which places it in the bottom 18% of more than 245 Zacks industries. The group’s Zacks Industry Rank, which is the average of the Zacks Rank of all the member stocks, indicates a dim near-term outlook. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. The industry’s positioning in the bottom 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries is a result of a negative earnings outlook for the constituent companies in aggregate. Over the past year, the industry’s earnings estimates for 2026 have moved down 38.7%. Before we present a couple of stocks that are still worth adding to your portfolio, let’s look at the industry’s recent stock market performance and current valuation. Industry Lags Sector and S&P 500The Zacks Automotive – Foreign industry has underperformed the Auto, Tires and Truck sector and the Zacks S&P 500 composite over the past year. The industry has lost 18% against the S&P 500 and the sector’s growth of 26% and 23%, respectively. Industry's Current ValuationSince automotive companies are debt-laden, it makes sense to value them based on the Enterprise Value/ Earnings before Interest Tax Depreciation and Amortization (EV/EBITDA) ratio. Based on the trailing 12-month enterprise value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA), the industry is currently trading at 10.15X compared with the S&P 500’s 18.75X and the sector’s 27.98X. Over the past five years, the industry has traded as high as 12.71X, as low as 6.97X and at a median of 9.30X. 3 Stocks to BuyYamaha: Based in Japan, Yamaha engages in the manufacture and sale of motorcycles, automotive engines and transportation equipment. It is positioned for profit recovery as its restructuring efforts begin to bear fruit while demand across its core businesses improves. The company expects revenues to rise 5.3% and core operating profit to climb nearly 19% in fiscal 2027, driven by stronger product mix, higher volumes and production efficiencies. Its musical instruments segment continues to gain traction through new product launches, growing guitar market share and an expected recovery in piano sales, while the audio equipment business is poised to return to growth as digital mixer, speaker and creator-focused product demand rebounds. Yamaha is also investing in long-term growth through India expansion, creator platforms and mobility audio, diversifying earnings beyond traditional hardware. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for YMHAY’s fiscal 2026 EPS and sales implies year-over-year growth of 595% and 2%, respectively. The consensus mark for fiscal 2026 and 2027 EPS has moved up 29 cents and 11 cents, respectively, over the past 60 days. The stock sports a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy). You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. BYD: This China-based company remains one of the strongest long-term growth stories in the global EV market, backed by its technology leadership, cost advantages and expanding international footprint. The company delivered 557,090 battery-electric vehicles in the second quarter, reflecting resilient demand despite intensifying competition in China's EV market. BYD continues to strengthen its competitive edge through investments in next-generation Blade batteries, autonomous driving chips, LiDAR-equipped affordable EVs and ultra-fast charging technology. Its vertically integrated business model—manufacturing nearly 80% of key components, including batteries and semiconductors—in-house, enables superior cost control and pricing flexibility during industry price wars. Overseas markets are becoming an increasingly important growth driver, with BYD targeting 1.6 million vehicle exports by 2026 after surpassing one million exports in 2025. The company's push into Europe's premium EV segment through the Denza brand further diversifies its growth opportunities and reduces dependence on China's increasingly competitive domestic market. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for BYDDY’s 2026 and 2027 EPS implies year-over-year growth of 28% and 22%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 EPS has moved up 1 cent each over the past 60 days. The stock carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). NIO: China’s NIO appears to be entering a stronger growth phase, supported by accelerating deliveries, an expanding product portfolio and improving profitability. The company delivered 107,658 vehicles in the second quarter of 2026, up 49.4% year over year, while June deliveries surged 62.9%, reflecting solid demand across its NIO, ONVO and Firefly brands. Its broadening lineup, including the recently launched flagship ES9, enables the company to target multiple customer segments while strengthening its presence in the premium EV market. Beyond sales growth, NIO is improving operational efficiency through a more decentralized organizational structure, resulting in better cost control and improved vehicle margins. NIO's extensive battery-swapping network of nearly 4,000 stations remains a key competitive advantage, while its subscription-based driver assistance services could generate recurring high-margin revenue, reducing dependence on vehicle sales over the long term. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NIO’s 2026 and 2027 bottom line implies a year-over-year improvement of 86% and 137%, respectively. The consensus mark for 2026 and 2027 bottom line has improved by 41% and 600%, respectively, over the past 60 days. The stock carries a Zacks Rank #2. Why Haven't You Looked at Zacks' Top Stocks?Since 2000, our top stock-picking strategies have blown away the S&P's +7.7% average gain per year. Amazingly, they soared with average gains of +48.4%, +50.2% and +56.7% per year. Today you can access their live picks without cost or obligation. See Stocks Free >> Join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZacksInvestmentResearch/ Zacks Investment Research is under common control with affiliated entities (including a broker-dealer and an investment adviser), which may engage in transactions involving the foregoing securities for the clients of such affiliates. Media Contact Zacks Investment Research 800-767-3771 ext. 9339 [email protected] https://www.zacks.com Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:17
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 07:08
26d ago
|
XPeng Aims to Produce Over 1,000 Robots a Month as It Plans Global Rollout | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The Chinese electric-vehicle maker plans to launch its humanoid robot globally next year, as part of efforts to transform into a physical AI company. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:14
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 04:40
26d ago
|
Lucid Dismisses Bankruptcy Rumors After Nasdaq Halts Trading. Here's Why the Stock Plunged Anyway. | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Shares of Lucid (LCID 16.15%) plunged following a rumor that the company was working with restructuring expert AlixPartners. Lucid quickly dismissed the idea that it was preparing for bankruptcy, and the stock recovered much of the ground it had lost. However, the shares still ended the day down by more than 10%. Here's what investors need to know.Lucid confirms part of the rumor, denies bankruptcy is the goalWhen asked about the rumor, Lucid confirmed to Bloomberg that it was working with AlixPartners. The company explained that AlixPartners is helping it improve execution and operations, and nothing more, adding that it "has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year." Image source: Getty Images. At the end of the first quarter, the electric car company had roughly $700 million in cash on its balance sheet and no short-term investments. A year ago, its cash balance was roughly $1 billion, with over $600 million in short-term investments. Meanwhile, at the end of the first quarter, it had $2 billion in long-term debt and another $500 million in other long-term liabilities, about the same as it had a year prior. In the first quarter alone, Lucid spent $630 million on research and development and selling, general, and administrative costs. Given the early stage of its development, those aren't optional costs. It generated only $282 million in revenue from car sales while spending nearly $600 million to build them. The business is not performing well, Wall Street is well aware of the problems, and telling investors that it has enough liquidity to last a year or so may not be as reassuring as the company thinks. To be fair to Lucid, the management team is relatively new. And AlixPartners does offer more than just bankruptcy services. So it is completely reasonable that a new management team would seek additional assistance as it looks to improve the performance of a troubled business. Today's Change ( -16.15 %) $ -0.89 Current Price $ 4.62 However, this is just another sign that Lucid is a very risky investment. Only the most aggressive investors should consider it, and even then, caution is advisable. Notably, Lucid had been falling short of its own production guidance and recently suspended its guidance amid the turnover of the top brass. Even if AlixPartners is simply there to help the company improve its business, investors have good reason to wonder what the exact goal of the company is at this point. And until there is more clarity on the business situation, most investors should probably watch from the sidelines. Lucid needs a new planWhat Lucid has been doing hasn't been working out as well as hoped. At this point, the company remains a money-losing start-up that has been falling short of its own goals. With cash running down and material debt, the new management team can use all the help it can get. It isn't a bad thing that Lucid has reached out to AlixPartners for an assist. However, given the state of the business, it also isn't a bad thing that investors see the involvement of a restructuring expert and fear the worst. Given the circumstances, that's a perfectly reasonable reaction. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:14
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$GTM Investor Loss Alert: ZoomInfo Investors may have been Misled after AI Integration Issues Lead to 33% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:GTM) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in ZoomInfo, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the ZoomInfo ($GTM) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 24, 2026Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud alleging that ZoomInfo misled investors regarding the impact of ZoomInfo’s AI-integrated products on customer retentionStock Drop: May 12, 2026 2026 – 33% Stock DropCourt: U.S. District Court for the Western District of WashingtonAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Investors have until August 24, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in ZoomInfo securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. It is captioned Tejeda v. ZoomInfo Technologies et al., No. 26-cv-05696. Why is ZoomInfo Being Sued for Securities Fraud? ZoomInfo has been sued for securities fraud following a significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws. The decline in ZoomInfo’s stock price caused significant losses to investors. ZoomInfo provides go-to-market (“GTM”) intelligence and a customer engagement platform for sales, marketing, operations, and recruiting professionals. Throughout the relevant period, ZoomInfo allegedly stated that “the demand for AI for GTM is evident up and down our customer stack.” According to ZoomInfo, its “innovative go-to-market AI” was “driving stronger daily engagement from a diverse set of go-to-market personas.” On February 9, 2026, ZoomInfo issued its 2026 revenue guidance “in the range of $1.247 billion to $1.267 billion,” because “in 2026, our focus is on bringing” ZoomInfo’s “all-in-one AI platform for go-to-market teams . . . to our customers at scale.” In truth, as alleged, ZoomInfo’s customer retention declined as customers were rejecting ZoomInfo’s AI products. Why did ZoomInfo’s Stock Drop? On May 11, 2026, ZoomInfo announced its Q1 2026 results and slashed its 2026 revenue guidance from $1.247-$1.267 billion to $1.185-$1.205 billion. ZoomInfo revealed that its customer growth “regressed” due to “AI and agentic confusion” leading to “a pause in [customers’] purchasing decisions[.]” This news caused the price of ZoomInfo stock to decline $1.98 per share, or 32.78%, from a closing price of $6.04 per share on May 11, 2026, to $4.06 per share on May 12, 2026. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in ZoomInfo, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/zoominfo-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:13
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 11:05
26d ago
|
USA: Index žádostí o hypotéky MBA k 10. červenci klesl o 2,7 % | FIO Stock News | |
|
Original source text
USA: Index žádostí o hypotéky MBA k 10. červenci klesl o 2,7 % |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:12
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
Elevance Health Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results; Raises Full-Year Guidance | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
INDIANAPOLIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV) reported second quarter 2026 results ahead of expectations. "Our second quarter results exceeded our outlook, supported by disciplined execution and improved operating performance across our diversified portfolio. We are raising our 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to at least $27.00 and accelerating targeted investments in the capabilities that matter most: medical cost management, member experience, provider connectivity, operating ef. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:12
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:19
26d ago
|
Elevance raises annual profit forecast on better medical cost management | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Elevance Health President and CEO Gail Boudreaux listens during a House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee hearing examining health insurance affordability and healthcare costs in... Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Read moreCompaniesJuly 15 (Reuters) - Elevance Health (ELV.N), opens new tab raised its annual profit forecast after beating second-quarter earnings estimates on Wednesday, as it looks to keep medical costs in check. In April, the company said it has greater clarity on medical costs for the rest of the year as it leans on its efforts to keep them under control. Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here. "Our second quarter results exceeded our outlook," Chief Executive Officer Gail Boudreaux said. Elevance, which has greater exposure to commercial insurance and Medicaid plans for low-income Americans, has been withdrawing from underperforming Medicare Advantage markets for older adults. Higher demand for healthcare services among members of government-funded plans has increased medical expenses for health insurers. For the quarter, the company reported a medical loss ratio, the percentage of premiums spent on medical care, of 89.7%. Analysts on average had expected a ratio of 90.15%, according to data compiled by LSEG. The health insurer forecast annual adjusted profit to be at least $27 per share, compared with at least $26.75 per share projected earlier. Analysts on average estimate an annual profit of $26.86 per share. The company posted a quarterly adjusted profit of $7.45 per share, surpassing analysts' average estimate of $6.21. Reporting by Sriparna Roy and Sneha S K in Bengaluru; Editing by Maju Samuel Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:12
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:44
26d ago
|
Elevance Health Raises Earnings Outlook on Higher Sales | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The health insurer raised its earnings outlook after logging a higher benefit-expense ratio and sales number in the second quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:12
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:35
26d ago
|
Zacks Industry Outlook Mondelez, Sysco, United Natural Foods and Mama's | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
For Immediate ReleaseChicago, IL – July 15, 2026 – Today, Zacks Equity Research Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ - Free Report) , Sysco Corp. (SYY - Free Report) , United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI - Free Report) and Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA - Free Report) .Industry: Food Link: https://www.zacks.com/commentary/2952895/4-miscellaneous-food-stocks-to-keep-an-eye-on-amid-industry-headwinds The Zacks Food-Miscellaneous industry continues to face a challenging environment as elevated living costs and cautious consumer spending drive demand for value-oriented and private-label products. Uneven foodservice demand, coupled with intense promotional activity, has pressured sales volumes and limited pricing flexibility, creating a competitive landscape for food companies. Despite these headwinds, companies are investing in product innovation, supply-chain modernization and operational efficiencies to strengthen profitability and competitiveness. Growing demand for health-focused and convenience-oriented foods is also creating new opportunities. Mondelez International, Inc., Sysco Corp., United Natural Foods, Inc. and Mama's Creations, Inc. are well positioned to capitalize on these trends. About the IndustryThe Zacks Food-Miscellaneous industry consists of companies that manufacture and sell a wide range of food and packaged food items, such as cereals, flour, sauces, bakery items, spices and condiments, natural and organic food items and frozen products. Some companies also provide comfort food items, such as chocolates and ready-to-serve meals, soups and snacks. A few players are engaged in providing pet food products and supplements. Several food companies also offer organic and natural products. Companies operating in this space sell their products mainly through wholesalers, distributors, large retail organizations, grocery chains, mass merchandisers, drug stores and e-commerce service providers. Some also cater to foodservice channels, including restaurants, cafes and hotels. Others offer services to schools, hospitals and industry caterers. Major Trends Shaping the Future of the Food IndustryValue-Conscious Consumer Behavior Pressures Demand: Consumer spending patterns remain pressured, with shoppers increasingly prioritizing value and affordability in everyday food purchases. Elevated living costs continue to accelerate the shift toward private-label and lower-priced alternatives, creating volume pressure for branded food manufacturers. Foodservice demand has also remained uneven as consumers moderate dining frequency and increasingly favor at-home consumption. These dynamics have intensified promotional activity and competition across categories, weighing on organic volume growth and limiting pricing flexibility for several industry participants. Persistent Cost Inflation Pressures Margins: Food companies continue to face elevated costs across raw materials, labor, packaging and transportation. Although prior pricing actions have provided partial relief, margin recovery remains uneven amid ongoing cost volatility. At the same time, companies are investing in supply-chain resilience, automation, manufacturing upgrades and operational efficiencies to strengthen long-term competitiveness. While strategically important, these initiatives have added near-term cost pressure, making profitability increasingly dependent on productivity gains, execution and disciplined expense management. Health and Wellness Trends Drive Portfolio Innovation: Growing demand for health-focused, functional and premium food products continues to create long-term growth opportunities across the industry. Consumers remain increasingly drawn to brands offering cleaner labels, nutritional benefits and convenience-oriented solutions. In response, companies are modernizing their portfolios through product innovation, reformulation initiatives and expansion into adjacent growth categories. These efforts are helping strengthen brand relevance, support pricing resilience and position companies for more sustainable long-term growth within the Food-Miscellaneous industry. Zacks Industry Rank Indicates Dull ProspectsThe Zacks Food-Miscellaneous industry is housed within the broader Zacks Consumer Staples sector. The industry currently carries a Zacks Industry Rank #214, which places it in the bottom 13% of more than 247 Zacks industries. The group’s Zacks Industry Rank, which is the average of the Zacks Rank of all the member stocks, indicates dull near-term prospects. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Looking at the aggregate earnings estimate revisions, it appears that analysts are gradually losing confidence about this group’s earnings growth potential. Since the beginning of May 2026, the industry’s consensus earnings estimate for the current financial year has declined 2.7%. Let’s take a look at the industry’s performance and current valuation. Industry vs. Broader MarketThe Zacks Food-Miscellaneous industry has underperformed the S&P 500 and the broader Zacks Consumer Staples sector over the past year. The industry has declined 22.7% over this period against the S&P 500 and the broader sector’s growth of 24.2% and 0.6%, respectively. Industry's Current ValuationOn the basis of forward 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E), which is commonly used for valuing consumer staples stocks, the industry is currently trading at 14.41X compared with the S&P 500’s 21.23X and the sector’s 16.96X. Over the past five years, the industry has traded as high as 19.32X and as low as 13.78X, with the median being at 16.67X. 4 Food Stocks to Keep a Close Eye OnUnited Natural Foods: This Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) company is one of North America's leading grocery wholesalers, serving retailers with a broad assortment of natural, organic, fresh, specialty and conventional products. United Natural Foods continues to strengthen its position through an extensive distribution network, value-added services and private brands that help retailers differentiate their offerings. The company remains focused on enhancing customer service, expanding digital and merchandising capabilities, modernizing its supply chain and improving operational efficiency through technology investments. United Natural Foods also continues to support retailers and suppliers with integrated solutions while maintaining disciplined cost management and productivity initiatives to drive profitable growth. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for UNFI’s current fiscal-year earnings per share (EPS) has remained unchanged at $2.52 over the past seven days. Shares of United Natural Foods have gained 109.4% over the past year. Mama's Creations: This Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) company is a provider of fresh deli-prepared foods, offering a broad portfolio of ready-to-eat and ready-to-cook meal solutions, including meatballs, chicken, meatloaf, sausages, pasta and other prepared foods. Mama's Creations continues to strengthen its position through product innovation, an expanding manufacturing and distribution network and growing relationships with leading grocery, club and mass retail customers. The company remains focused on enhancing operational efficiency through technology investments and supply-chain improvements while expanding its branded and private-label offerings. Mama's Creations also emphasizes disciplined execution, customer collaboration and strategic acquisitions to support sustainable growth and profitability. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for MAMA’s current fiscal-year EPS has remained unchanged at 26 cents over the past seven days. Shares of Mama's Creations have rallied 115.2% over the past year. Mondelez: As one of the world's leading snacking companies, this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock boasts a strong portfolio of iconic brands, including Oreo, Ritz, LU, Clif Bar and Tate's Bake Shop, along with premium chocolate brands such as Cadbury Dairy Milk, Milka and Toblerone. Mondelez continues to drive growth through its core categories, including chocolate, biscuits and baked snacks. Strategic portfolio optimization, product innovation and strong brand activations remain key contributors to the company’s long-term growth strategy. Mondelez is also focused on enhancing brand relevance, improving operational efficiency and maintaining disciplined cost management to support profitability. In addition, the company continues to expand its presence in better-for-you and wellness-oriented snacking categories to address evolving consumer preferences. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Mondelez’s current financial-year EPS has fallen 0.3% to $3.05 in the past seven days. Shares of MDLZ have fallen 10.4% in the past year. Sysco:This Zacks Rank #3 company continues to capitalize on opportunities in the expanding food-away-from-home market through its diversified foodservice distribution operations and customer-focused approach. Sysco's "Recipe for Growth" framework remains central to its business strategy, strengthening sales capabilities, supply-chain execution, digital solutions and customer engagement. The company continues to enhance operational efficiency through technology investments, merchandising initiatives and disciplined cost management while improving service levels across its distribution network. Sysco is also expanding its reach across customer segments and distribution channels, supported by a strong sales organization and ongoing investments aimed at driving sustainable growth and profitability. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for SYY’s current fiscal-year EPS has remained unchanged at $4.59 in the past seven days. Shares of Sysco have gained 9.2% in a year. Why Haven't You Looked at Zacks' Top Stocks?Since 2000, our top stock-picking strategies have blown away the S&P's +7.7% average gain per year. Amazingly, they soared with average gains of +48.4%, +50.2% and +56.7% per year. Today you can access their live picks without cost or obligation. See Stocks Free >> Join us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ZacksInvestmentResearch/ Zacks Investment Research is under common control with affiliated entities (including a broker-dealer and an investment adviser), which may engage in transactions involving the foregoing securities for the clients of such affiliates. Media Contact Zacks Investment Research 800-767-3771 ext. 9339 [email protected] https://www.zacks.com Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Zacks Investment Research does not engage in investment banking, market making or asset management activities of any securities. These returns are from hypothetical portfolios consisting of stocks with Zacks Rank = 1 that were rebalanced monthly with zero transaction costs. These are not the returns of actual portfolios of stocks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index. Visit https://www.zacks.com/performance for information about the performance numbers displayed in this press release. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 11:05
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:23
26d ago
|
Jefferies says sale is best way forward for NextEnergy Solar Fund as shares rise 5% | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Shares in NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd (LSE:NESF, FRA:5NE) rose 5% to 50.13p on Wednesday after the company launched a formal sale process, with Jefferies saying a sale appears the best way forward.The investment bank pointed to the valuation implied by Drax's offer for Bluefield Solar Income Fund as evidence of what solar assets are worth to trade buyers. Jefferies also noted that a sale would allow NextEnergy to repay its preference shares, avoiding potential dilution to ordinary shareholders at a later stage. The broker flagged several complications in sourcing bids. The make-whole terms attached to the preference shares could be one obstacle. So too could non-core parts of the portfolio, including the NextPower III fund and co-investment interests, the battery storage asset and the Italian assets. More positively, Jefferies said the notice period under the management contract is only 12 months. NextEnergy Solar Fund, which invests in operating solar power plants, announced the formal sale process on Wednesday, inviting expressions of interest for the entire issued share capital. The board said it was not in active discussions with any potential offeror and had not received an approach as of the date of the announcement. NextEnergy Capital, the fund's investment manager, supports the decision. The move follows a strategic review whose results were announced in March and reflects a share price discount to net asset value that has persisted for several years. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:54
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:06
26d ago
|
Nike May Soon Be Booted From the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and This Trillion-Dollar Stock That's Rallied 6,100,000% Is the Ideal Replacement | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
For more than 130 years, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI +0.02%) has served as one of Wall Street's most-watched health barometers. It's expanded from an industrial-dominated 12-stock index to one that now houses 30 diverse, multinational businesses.It's also an index built around change. Since May 1896, there have been 54 instances in which companies were added to or removed from the Dow. We're likely on track for another adjustment, with Nike (NKE 1.87%) primed to get the boot, and trillion-dollar conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA 0.99%)(BRKB 1.07%) ideally positioned to replace it. Image source: Getty Images. Nike has failed to step up as a Dow component S&P Dow Jones Indices considers several factors when adding or removing companies from the iconic Dow. Chief among them is a company's share price. Unlike the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite, which are market-cap-weighted indexes, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is a share-price-weighted index. For example, even though Nvidia is the largest publicly traded company, it ranks 20th in influence among the 30 Dow stocks, thanks to its roughly $211 share price. Nike closed out July 10 at $44.37 per share -- far and away the lowest share price in the Dow. Today's Change ( -1.87 %) $ -0.82 Current Price $ 42.94 In addition to its minimal influence, Nike has vastly underperformed since joining the index in September 2013. Whereas Wall Street's timeless index has rallied 242% since Nike's addition, the footwear and apparel specialist has gained (drum roll)... only 29%. Nike's direct-to-consumer strategy fizzled and damaged previously profitable wholesale relationships. While this damage is fixable, S&P Dow Jones Indices is unlikely to keep Nike in the Dow as it attempts a multiyear turnaround. Warren Buffett transformed Berkshire Hathaway into a trillion-dollar company. Image source: The Motley Fool. It may be time for Berkshire Hathaway to shine Removing Nike from the Dow Jones Industrial Average doesn't mean a retailer necessarily has to replace it. But with six tech stocks already represented in the index, something consumer-facing would make sense. Although Berkshire Hathaway is a financial company by nature (it's the parent of insurer GEICO) and has a nearly $349 billion investment portfolio, it also owns roughly five dozen businesses. These wholly owned assets give Berkshire exposure in retail, railroad, insurance, manufacturing, restaurants, and energy, among other industries and sectors. Several years ago, adding Berkshire Hathaway to the Dow wouldn't have made sense. The company's lower-priced Class B shares (BRKB) were always a bit too pricey for an index that historically didn't have too many components with triple-digit price tags. Today, there are only three Dow components trading below $114 per share and just 10 below $211. Berkshire's Class B shares, which are trading at $494 as of July 10, would fit right in. Today's Change ( -1.07 %) $ -5.34 Current Price $ 491.51 The company that the now-retired Warren Buffett built into a trillion-dollar conglomerate also has a history of handily outperforming the S&P 500. Under Buffett's six-decade watch, Berkshire appreciated by approximately 6,100,000%! The only hurdle I can see for Berkshire joining the Dow is its aforementioned $349 billion investment portfolio. Berkshire is already invested heavily in several Dow components, including Apple, American Express, and Alphabet. Adding it to the Dow would, essentially, concentrate the index even further in these names. Despite these investments, it may be the logical replacement for Nike if/when S&P Dow Jones Indices gives it the boot. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:54
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
Buffett's Final $140 Billion Trade: Here's Where All His Stock Is Going, and Who Got Left Out | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Warren Buffett just made the largest trade of his life, and it has nothing to do with the stock market. On Tuesday, July 14, 2026, the 95-year-old Berkshire Hathaway chairman committed to giving away every remaining share he owns, currently worth more than $140 billion, to four family foundations by December 31, 2034. He backed it up by donating roughly $6 billion in Berkshire Class B stock (NYSE:BRK-B | BRK-B Price Prediction) the same day. For the first time since 2006, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, recipient of nearly $48 billion from Buffett over two decades, got nothing.The $140 Billion Plan “My goal is to dispose of all of my Berkshire shares within about eight years,” Buffett said. “Of course, mortality is unpredictable, but my remaining shares will be donated to the four foundations one way or the other by December 31, 2034.” The new plan sets a hard date regardless of when he dies, replacing the old plan that left his three children to distribute his fortune within 10 years of his death. Buffett currently holds 188,290 Class A shares and 1,162 Class B shares, worth roughly $140-150 billion. Clearing that by 2034 implies at least $17 billion in donations per year, more than double the roughly $7 billion he gave in 2025. He has pledged 99.5% of his estate to philanthropy: “My will provides that about 99.5% of my estate is destined for philanthropic usage. Nothing will go to endowments; I want the money spent on current needs.” Tuesday’s $6 Billion and Where It Went The immediate donation totaled 12 million Class B shares, roughly $5.9-6 billion, split four ways. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation received 9 million shares, about $4.4-4.5 billion, by far the largest allocation. The Sherwood Foundation, the Howard G. Buffett Foundation, and the NoVo Foundation each received 1 million shares, about $496-500 million. All shares were converted from Class A stock. Buffett keeps his remaining A shares, which carry nearly all of Berkshire’s voting power, preserving effective control even as his economic stake shrinks. Who Got Left Out The Gates Foundation’s absence stands out. Buffett had donated every year since 2006, nearly 20 consecutive years and more than $47-48 billion. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that Buffett was holding back the scheduled Gates donation pending a law firm’s review. The stated reason: Bill Gates’ disclosed connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Department of Justice documents released earlier in 2026 revealed Epstein spent a decade cultivating people close to Gates, including foundation advisers. Gates has not been accused of participating in Epstein’s illegal actions. He has said he only met Epstein because he thought it might help raise money for charitable causes, and told the House Oversight Committee he regretted the meetings. Buffett said: “He found their weakness. It might have been sex. It might be power.” The Gates Foundation responded: “The Gates Foundation is grateful to Warren Buffett for his decades of support. His gifts, totaling more than $47 billion, have helped us. The foundation continues from a position of financial strength to advance our work through 2045, supported by Bill’s $200 billion commitment.” Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Berkshire Hathaway didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today. What It Means for Berkshire Shareholders If you own Berkshire and just read “$140 billion in stock being distributed,” the structure matters. Buffett is transferring shares directly to foundations rather than selling them on the open market, so there is no sudden supply flood pressuring the price. The foundations will sell gradually over years to fund operations, the same pattern the Gates Foundation followed. Governance is the real question. Greg Abel became CEO at the end of 2025, but Buffett as chairman retains effective control through his A shares. The pivotal long-term issue is who controls those A shares after Buffett departs. Berkshire’s cash pile hit a record $380 billion in Q1 FY2026 per the company’s 8-K filing, and shares are down 2.3% year to date, trading near $491.09. Given the direct-transfer structure, Tuesday’s announcement should carry no immediate negative price impact. The Largest Philanthropic Act in History Buffett has now given more than $60-61 billion in his lifetime, with roughly $140 billion still to come, a combined commitment near $200 billion, the largest philanthropic pledge in American history. He co-founded the Giving Pledge with Bill and Melinda Gates in 2010, alongside signatories including Musk, Zuckerberg, Bezos, and MacKenzie Scott, which makes the Buffett-Gates rupture all the more striking in the pledge’s 16th year. He is 95, turning 96 next month, and the deadline he set himself is eight years away. The world’s greatest investor has made one final trade, and the return he is chasing is not measured in dollars. Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and Berkshire Hathaway didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today. Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:53
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 10:47
26d ago
|
Souboj platebních gigantů. Stripe chce ovládnout PayPal | Patria Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Stripe spojil síly se soukromou investiční společností Advent International ve snaze převzít jednoho ze svých nejstarších rivalů, PayPal.Obě firmy předložily společnou nabídku ve výši 60,50 dolarů za akcii, což představuje 28 % prémii oproti závěrečné ceně akcií PayPalu 47 dolarů v úterý. Společnost na nabídku zatím nereagovala. PayPal byl kdysi lídrem v oblasti digitálních plateb, ale jeho růst v posledních letech zpomalil pod tlakem konkurentů, jako jsou Apple Pay a Google Pay. Tržní hodnota společnosti dosáhla vrcholu v roce 2021, kdy se blížila 360 miliardám dolarů. Letos však klesla na přibližně 36 miliard dolarů, což představuje 40% pokles za posledních 12 měsíců. Podle agentury Reuters předložily Stripe a Advent nabídku začátkem tohoto měsíce, poté co již v dubnu učinily první krok směrem k PayPalu. Nabídku podporuje přibližně 50 miliard USD zajištěného bankovního financování. Podle návrhu by Stripe a Advent vlastnily rovnocenné podíly a PayPal by ponechaly jako celek, namísto jeho rozdělení či rozprodeje po částech. Nabídka přichází v době mimořádně aktivního období na trhu fúzí a akvizic. Celosvětový objem transakcí dosáhl v první polovině roku 2026 rekordních 2,8 bilionu dolarů a očekává se, že za celý rok vzroste až na 4 biliony. PayPal zatím na nabídku neodpověděl. Zdroje Reuters uvedly, že Stripe a Advent stále doufají, že se během několika týdnů podaří jednání posunout vpřed. Případná transakce by spojila dvě významné platební sítě pod jednoho vlastníka. Stripe vlastní společnost Bridge, platformu pro infrastrukturu stablecoinů, kterou koupil v roce 2025 za 1,1 miliardy. Bridge umožňuje firmám vydávat vlastní tokeny navázané na americký dolar, aniž by sama provozovala spotřebitelskou kryptoměnu. PayPal by do spojení přinesl druhou část této skládačky. Jeho stablecoin PYUSD je již dostupný běžným uživatelům a jeho tržní kapitalizace činí téměř 2,9 miliardy dolarů. Spojení nástrojů pro emisi tokenů od Bridge s uživatelskou základnou PYUSD by nově vzniklé společnosti poskytlo kontrolu nad oběma klíčovými částmi ekosystému stablecoinů. Není však jisté, že nabídka skutečně povede k uzavření dohody. Nadcházející týdny ukážou, zda se představenstvo PayPalu rozhodne zahájit jednání. Zdroj: Yahoo Finance, BeInCrypto |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:53
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 05:05
26d ago
|
What It Takes to Fund a Beach House From Dividend Income | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.The fantasy of owning a beach house rarely dies at the closing table. It usually dies later, when the insurance renewal arrives, the HVAC fails in August, and the property tax bill lands the same week as a roof estimate. Even without a mortgage payment, the carrying costs can turn a dream home into a second job. A paid-off beach house can still be expensive enough to strain a retirement plan. Even if there is no mortgage, or the mortgage is being paid from a separate income source, the house still has to be insured, maintained, repaired, cleaned, taxed, and protected from storm damage. Those are the costs this article is sizing: not the purchase price, not the down payment, and not the mortgage, but the annual expense of keeping a beach house you already own. Market and Usage Make a Difference The math changes dramatically by market and usage. A modest condo on the Alabama Gulf Coast, a cottage on North Carolina’s Outer Banks, a Florida beach house, and a second home in the Hamptons or Nantucket are not the same financial decision. In some markets, renting for the weeks you actually use the beach may be far cheaper than owning year-round. In others, buying can make more sense if you plan to use the home often and can rent it out during peak weeks, though rental income should be treated as a cushion rather than a guarantee. Local rules, cleaning costs, platform fees, occupancy taxes, storm exposure, and seasonal vacancy can all change the equation. The Conservative Tier: Growth Over Headline Yield At a 3.5% yield, replacing $40,000 of annual expense requires roughly $1,142,857 of invested capital. This tier lives in dividend-growth utilities, broad-market dividend aristocrats, and blue-chip regulated names where the payout compounds year after year. NextEra Energy (NYSE:NEE | NEE Price Prediction) is the archetype. The company expects to grow its dividend roughly 10% annually through 2026, then about 6% per year through 2028, with 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $3.92 to $4.02 and a targeted 8%+ earnings CAGR through 2032. The current yield sits near 2.6%, which looks unimpressive next to a mortgage REIT. But shares have returned 251% over the past decade, and the dividend itself has more than doubled over the same stretch. The Moderate Tier: Where Most Beach House Portfolios Live At a 6% blended yield, the same $40,000 income target requires roughly $666,667. This is the practical sweet spot, populated by net lease REITs, closed-end utility funds, and preferred shares. Realty Income (NYSE:O) has paid 670+ consecutive monthly dividends since 1999, with the current monthly payout at $0.271 and a yield near 5.1%. NNN REIT (NYSE:NNN) has raised its dividend 36 consecutive years and now yields close to 5.0% at a current price near $47. Reaves Utility Income Fund (NYSE:UTG), a closed-end fund focused on regulated utilities and infrastructure, just raised its monthly distribution from $0.19 to $0.20, which annualizes to about $2.40 against a share price near $40, or roughly a 6% yield. The Aggressive Tier: High Current Income, Fragile Principal At a 10% yield, the capital required drops to $400,000. Business development companies, mortgage REITs, and leveraged option-income funds live here. Main Street Capital (NYSE:MAIN) pays a $0.26 monthly regular dividend plus a $0.30 quarterly supplemental, combining to roughly $4.32 annualized, or about 8% at a share price near $52. Genuine 10%+ yields typically require mortgage REITs or leveraged covered-call vehicles, where distributions can be cut and principal erosion is a recurring feature. Here’s the Compounding Insight You Shouldn’t Miss A beach house is a 20- to 30-year commitment, so inflation matters more than the first-year budget suggests. The CPI-U rose from 315.605 in December 2024 to 335.123 in May 2026, a 6.2% increase in 17 months. Coastal insurance can rise even faster: GAO found that average homeowners insurance premiums rose 25% or more in some southern coastal areas from 2019 through 2024. A static 10% yield loses purchasing power every year the payout stays flat. A lower-yield portfolio compounds differently if the payout actually grows. A 3% yield growing at 8% annually nearly doubles the income stream in nine years and more than doubles it in 10. It does not overtake a flat 10% payout by year 15; it takes about 16 years for the growing 3% income stream to pass the static 10% income stream on the same starting capital. The Storm On the Horizon Insurance is not the same thing as protection from storm risk. Review the wind, named-storm, hurricane, and flood deductibles separately, because coastal policies may leave the owner responsible for a much larger share of damage than a standard homeowners deductible would suggest. Also ask whether the home has prior flood claims, whether it sits inside or near a special flood hazard area, and whether private flood coverage is available if NFIP pricing changes. Three Moves Before You Sign a Purchase Contract Model the real carrying cost, not the sticker price. Get actual quotes for homeowners, wind, named-storm, and flood coverage in the specific ZIP code, then pull the county property tax rate and use a maintenance reserve that reflects the home’s age and condition. Fannie Mae says a common rule of thumb is 1% to 4% of the home’s value per year for maintenance, repairs, and replacements. Layer the tiers rather than picking one. A blend of dividend-growth utilities, net-lease REITs, and a small allocation to a BDC may produce a weighted yield in the 5% to 6% range with some growth potential. Pure aggressive-tier portfolios can be more vulnerable when credit markets, interest rates, or real estate valuations turn against them. Stress-test the after-tax number in the state where the house sits. The 10-year Treasury was near 4.5% in early July 2026, so the yield premium on dividend equities is thinner than it looks once qualified-dividend taxes, state income tax on distributions, and the property tax bill on the house itself are stacked together. The Investment Behind the House The portfolio behind the beach house is the real investment. Build that first, and the house becomes something you enjoy rather than something you constantly feed. The point is not to make the property free. It is to know, before you buy, whether the income stream can carry the dream through insurance renewals, repairs, taxes, and the occasional ugly surprise. Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:52
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
Southern Cross Gold Hits 26.2 g/t Gold in First Deep Drilling Beneath Historic Redcastle Goldfield | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Vancouver, British Columbia and Melbourne, Australia--(Newsfile Corp. - July 15, 2026) - Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd (TSX: SXGC) (ASX: SX2) (OTCQX: SXGCF) (FSE: MV3) ("SXGC", "SX2" or the "Company") announces results from two drill holes from the 100%-owned Redcastle Project in Victoria (Figures 1 to 7). Redcastle is located 64 km to the NNW of the Company's Sunday Creek project (Figure 7).Best results included 26.2 g/t Au over 0.14 m from 112.98 m and 15.4 g/t Au over 0.22 m from 321.84 m in drill hole SDDRE016 at the Laura prospect, two of eight individual high-grade gold intervals from that hole, which confirmed Costerfield-style gold-antimony mineralization including visible gold over more than 250 m of vertical extent. The true thickness of the mineralized intervals is interpreted to be approximately 70% to 85% of the sampled thickness for all reported holes. Four High Level Takeaways: First deep test confirms the system. SDDRE016 is among the first holes to test the Laura prospect below the historic workings and water table, intersecting gold and antimony bearing vein mineralisation over more than 250 m of vertical extent, with visible gold in subvertical extensional veins reminiscent of Costerfield-style mineralization. High grades at depth. Eight separate high-grade gold intervals were returned from SDDRE016, headlined by 26.2 g/t Au over 0.14 m from 112.98 m, 15.4 g/t Au over 0.22 m from 321.84 m and 5.0 g/t Au with 0.33% Sb over 0.10 m from 294.11 m, demonstrating that the high grades historically mined at surface continue at depth. A district-scale opportunity. Redcastle hosts 14 individual reefs across a 900 m cross-strike corridor and combined historic workings over 17 km of strike, the great majority of which has never been drill tested below approximately 50 m depth, providing a strong pipeline of targets along strike from Costerfield. Regional growth in the Victorian epizonal goldfields alongside Sunday Creek. Eleven drill rigs are now operational across the 10km sitrike at Sunday Creek, with two rigs dedicated to targets outside the core drill area up to 8 km to the east, as the Company advances its 200,000 m drill program through to Q1 2027 with results pending from 71 holes. Michael Hudson, President & CEO, states: "These are the first deep holes ever drilled beneath the Laura prospect at Redcastle, and they have done exactly what we hoped. We have intersected high-grade gold, visible gold and antimony in the same Costerfield-style vein architecture that has made this corner of Victoria one of the highest-grade gold endowments on earth. "Redcastle sits just 7 km along strike from Costerfield, on a parallel structure, with 14 reefs over a 900 m wide corridor and 17 km of historic workings that have barely been scratched below the water table. SDDRE016 tells us the system has real depth potential, and it is only the beginning of a sustained regional campaign. "With eleven rigs now turning across our landholding and results pending from 71 holes, Redcastle adds a genuine second engine of discovery alongside Sunday Creek as we drill through to the first quarter of 2027." For Those Who Like the Details - Highlights: SDDRE016 (Laura) tested the mineralized western limb of the NNW-SSE trending Redcastle Anticline and a large IP chargeability body modelled from 155 m. The hole intersected steeply west-dipping bedding-parallel laminated veins and steep extensional veins hosting pyrite-arsenopyrite mineralization with associated gold and antimony from 102 m to 360 m, before passing through the anticlinal hinge at approximately 380 m to a final depth of 410.45 m. Highlights include:2.1 g/t Au & 0.81% Sb over 0.10 m from 103.30 m2.5 g/t Au over 0.35 m from 110.91 m26.2 g/t Au over 0.14 m from 112.98 m1.1 g/t Au over 0.10 m from 154.45 m5.0 g/t Au & 0.33% Sb over 0.10 m from 294.11 m15.4 g/t Au over 0.22 m from 321.84 m4.8 g/t Au over 0.21 m from 329.57 m2.8 g/t Au over 0.14 m from 334.50 mSDDRE017 (Beautiful Venus) was drilled west to east to test below historic workings intersected at approximately 42.5 m vertical depth in earlier hole MDDRE014. Trace antimony was observed in a steep extensional vein at 66.5 m down hole, and low-tenor gold was returned, with a best result of 0.91 g/t Au over 0.29 m from 140.71 m. The hole confirms the structural setting and vein style and will help vector future drilling at the prospect.Drill Hole Discussion Two drill holes are reported here targeting the Laura and Beautiful Venus prospects within the broader Redcastle Project, drilled in a west-to-east orientation to optimize high intersection angles across the steeply dipping vein architecture. SDDRE016 SDDRE016 was designed to test the mineralized western limb of an NNW-SSE trending Redcastle Anticline, targeting at depth several bedding-parallel to sub-parallel structures expressed as workings at surface, together with a large IP chargeability body modelled from 155 m. The hole intersected steeply west-dipping bedding and vein-hosted pyrite-arsenopyrite mineralization from 102 m to 360 m, before passing through an anticlinal hinge at approximately 380 m to a final depth of 410.45 m. Mineralized veins were absent between the hinge zone and the end of hole. Three styles of mineralized features were logged: a deformed black shale unit, bedding-parallel laminated veins, and steep to vertical extensional veins. Mineralization is punctuated by arsenopyrite-pyrite halos developed around veins, with antimony and gold hosted within the veins themselves. Visible gold was intersected in subvertical extensional veins fringed by arsenopyrite haloes, reminiscent of Costerfield-style mineralization. As one of the first holes to test the Laura prospect to this depth, SDDRE016 is highly encouraging. The headline 26.2 g/t Au intercept lies at a vertical depth of approximately 86 m below surface, while deeper high-grade veins extend the mineralized system to more than 250 m of vertical extent. Further drilling is required to define strike and dip continuity between intercepts. Better results included: 2.1 g/t Au & 0.81% Sb over 0.10 m from 103.30 m2.5 g/t Au & 0.00% Sb over 0.35 m from 110.91 m26.2 g/t Au & 0.01% Sb over 0.14 m from 112.98 m1.1 g/t Au & 0.06% Sb over 0.10 m from 154.45 m5.0 g/t Au & 0.33% Sb over 0.10 m from 294.11 m15.4 g/t Au & 0.03% Sb over 0.22 m from 321.84 m4.8 g/t Au & 0.00% Sb over 0.21 m from 329.57 m2.8 g/t Au & 0.00% Sb over 0.14 m from 334.50 mSDDRE017 SDDRE017 tested the Beautiful Venus prospect, drilled west to east where the previous hole MDDRE014 intersected old workings at a vertical depth of 42.5 m. Trace antimony was observed in a steep extensional vein at 66.5 m down hole. The hole returned low-tenor gold, with a best individual result of 0.91 g/t Au over 0.29 m from 140.71 m, and confirms the structural and vein setting for future targeting at the prospect. Figure 1: Regional drill rig set up at Redcastle. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_003full.jpg About Redcastle The Redcastle Gold-Antimony Project, located 110 km north of Melbourne and 64 km NNW of Sunday Creek in central Victoria. The project comprises three granted exploration licences (EL5546, EL7498 and EL7499) covering a combined 7,500 hectares. The project straddles the northern tenements of Alkane Resources' Costerfield gold-antimony mine, sitting 7 km along strike from Costerfield on a parallel north-south structure and 24 km east of Agnico Eagle's Fosterville mine. The Redcastle goldfield is a structurally controlled epizonal system, centred on the western limb of the plunging Redcastle Anticline and hosted in thinly interbedded Silurian sandstones and mudstones. Gold mineralization occurs in bedding-parallel laminated quartz veins striking ~345° and dipping steeply westward, containing quartz, carbonate, visible gold and stibnite, with a narrow arsenopyrite-pyrite halo in the surrounding host rock. The field is distinguished by closely spaced reefs, with 14 individual reefs occurring across a 900 m cross-strike distance on the western side, and combined historic workings extending over 17 km of strike. First discovered in 1859, Redcastle is one of the most significant historic epizonal high-grade goldfields in Victoria. Reef mining during the 1859 to 1865 period delivered exceptional grades from narrow, continuous structures: the Welcome Group of mines extracted 20,583 oz at 254.6 g/t Au over 2 km of strike length down to a maximum depth of 125 m, and the Redcastle Gold Mining Company produced 35,000 oz at 33 g/t Au from Clarke's Reef. Historic mining was shallow (average ~55 m depth) with individual reef widths typically under 0.6 m and average mining widths of approximately 1 m. Further Information Further discussion and analysis of the Redcastle project is available at https://www.southerncrossgold.com/projects/redcastle on the SXGC website. These data, along with an interview on these results with President & CEO/Managing Director Michael Hudson can be viewed at www.southerncrossgold.com. No upper gold grade cut is applied in the averaging and intervals are reported as drill thickness. However, during future Mineral Resource studies, the requirement for assay top cutting will be assessed. The Company notes that due to rounding of assay results to one decimal place, minor variations in calculated composite grades may occur. Figures 1 to 7 show project location, plan and longitudinal views of drill results reported here and Tables 1 to 2 provide collar and assay data. The true thickness of the mineralized intervals reported individually as estimated true widths ("ETW"), otherwise they are interpreted to be approximately 70% to 85% of the sampled thickness for other reported holes. No compositing has been undertaken. Critical Metal Epizonal Gold-Antimony Deposits Redcastle (Figure 7) is an epizonal gold-antimony deposit formed in the late Devonian (like Fosterville, Costerfield and Sunday Creek), 60 million years later than mesozonal gold systems formed in Victoria (for example Ballarat and Bendigo). Epizonal deposits are a form of orogenic gold deposit classified according to their depth of formation: epizonal (<6 km), mesozonal (6 km to 12 km) and hypozonal (>12 km). Epizonal deposits in Victoria often have associated high levels of the critical metal, antimony, and Sunday Creek and Redcastle are no exception. China claims a 56 per cent share of global mined supplies of antimony, according to a 2023 European Union study. Antimony features highly on the critical minerals lists of many countries including Australia, the United States of America, Canada, Japan and the European Union. Australia ranks seventh for antimony production despite all production coming from a single mine at Costerfield in Victoria, located nearby to all SXGC projects. Antimony alloys with lead and tin which results in improved properties for solders, munitions, bearings and batteries. Antimony is a prominent additive for halogen-containing flame retardants. Adequate supplies of antimony are critical to the world's energy transition, and to the high-tech industry, especially the semi-conductor and defence sectors where it is a critical additive to primers in munitions. About Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Limited (TSX: SXGC) (ASX: SX2) (OTCQX: SXGCF) (FSE: MV3) Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd. (TSX: SXGC) (ASX: SX2) (OTCQX: SXGCF) is defining a leading gold-antimony project at the Sunday Creek Gold-Antimony Project, located 60 km north of Melbourne. Sunday Creek is a significant gold and antimony drill discovery in a Tier 1 location, with high-grade drill results including 88 composite intersections exceeding 100 g/t Au from 126.3 km of drilling. The mineralization follows a "Golden Ladder" structure over 12 km of strike length, with structures tested from surface to 1,200 m depth. Sunday Creek's strategic value is enhanced by its dual-metal profile. The Company has a critical mineral the Western world needs. This has gained increased significance following China's export restrictions on antimony, a critical metal for defence and semiconductor applications. Southern Cross' inclusion in the US Defense Industrial Base Consortium (DIBC) and Australia's AUKUS-related legislative changes position it as a potential key Western antimony supplier. Technical fundamentals further strengthen the investment case, with preliminary metallurgical work showing non-refractory mineralization suitable for conventional processing and gold recoveries of 93% to 98% through gravity and flotation. With a strong cash position, 1,392 Ha of strategic freehold land ownership, and a large 200 km drill program planned through Q1 2027, SXGC is well-positioned to advance this globally significant gold-antimony discovery in a tier-one jurisdiction, delivering milestone by milestone. - Ends - For ASX Compliance: This announcement has been approved for release by the Board of Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd. NI 43-101 Technical Background and Qualified Person Kenneth Bush, Head of Exploration for SXGC, a Member of Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Registered Professional Geologist in the fields of Mining and Exploration (#10315), is the Qualified Person as defined by the NI 43-101. Mr Bush has prepared, reviewed, verified and approved the technical contents of this release. Analytical samples are transported to the Bendigo facility of On Site Laboratory Services ("On Site") which operates under both an ISO 9001 and NATA quality systems. Samples were prepared and analyzed for gold using the fire assay technique (PE01S method; 25 gram charge), followed by measuring the gold in solution with flame AAS equipment. Samples for multi-element analysis (BM011 and over-range methods as required) use aqua regia digestion and ICP-MS analysis. The QA/QC program of Southern Cross Gold consists of the systematic insertion of certified standards of known gold content, blanks within interpreted mineralized rock and quarter core duplicates. In addition, On Site inserts blanks and standards into the analytical process. SXGC considers that both gold and antimony that are included in the gold equivalent calculation ("AuEq") have reasonable potential to be recovered and sold at Redcastle, given current geochemical understanding, historic production statistics and geologically analogous mining operations. The Costerfield mine corridor, now owned by Alkane Resources (previously Mandalay Resources) contains two million ounces of equivalent gold (Mandalay Resources Q3 2021 Results), and in 2020 was the sixth highest-grade global underground mine and a top 5 global producer of antimony. SXGC considers that it is appropriate to adopt the same gold equivalent variables as Mandalay Resources Ltd in its 2024 End of Year Mineral Reserves and Resources Press Release, dated February 20, 2025. The gold equivalence formula used by Mandalay Resources was calculated using Costerfield's 2024 production costs, using a gold price of US$2,500 per ounce, an antimony price of US$19,000 per tonne and 2024 total year metal recoveries of 91% for gold and 92% for antimony, and is as follows: AuEq = Au (g/t) + 2.39 × Sb (%) Based on the latest Costerfield calculation and given the similar geological styles of Redcastle mineralization and Costerfield, SXGC considers that a AuEq = Au (g/t) + 2.39 × Sb (%) is appropriate to use for the initial early stage exploration targeting of gold-antimony mineralization at Sunday Creek and Redcastle. JORC Competent Person Statement Information in this announcement that relates to new exploration results contained in this report is based on information compiled by Mr Kenneth Bush a Member of Australian Institute of Geoscientists and a Registered Professional Geologist in the fields of Mining and Exploration (#10315). Mr Bush has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activities undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Joint Ore Reserves Committee (JORC) Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Bush is Head of Exploration of Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Limited and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. Certain information in this announcement that relates to prior exploration results is extracted from the Independent Geologist's Report dated 11 December 2024 which was issued with the consent of the Competent Person, Mr Steven Tambanis. The report is included in the Company's prospectus dated 11 December 2024 and is available at www.asx.com.au under code "SX2". The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information related to exploration results included in the original market announcement. The Company confirms that the form and context of the Competent Persons' findings in relation to the report have not been materially modified from the original market announcement. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original document/announcement and the Company confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement. Forward-Looking Statement This news release contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions and accordingly, actual results and future events could differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. You are hence cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of present or historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include words or expressions such as "proposed", "will", "subject to", "near future", "in the event", "would", "expect", "prepared to" and other similar words or expressions. Factors that could cause future results or events to differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include general business, economic, competitive, political, social uncertainties; the state of capital markets, unforeseen events, developments, or factors causing any of the expectations, assumptions, and other factors ultimately being inaccurate or irrelevant; and other risks described in the Company's documents filed with Canadian or Australian (under code SX2) securities regulatory authorities. You can find further information with respect to these and other risks in filings made by the Company with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada or Australia (under code SX2), as applicable, and available for the Company in Canada at www.sedarplus.ca or in Australia at www.asx.com.au (under code SX2). Documents are also available at www.southerncrossgold.com The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable law. Figure 2: Redcastle plan view showing selected results from holes SDDRE016 with selected prior reported drill holes, hillshaded LiDAR and historic workings. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_004full.jpg Figure 3: Redcastle plan view showing selected results from holes SDDRE017 with selected prior reported drill holes, hillshaded LiDAR and historic workings. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_005full.jpg Figure 4: Redcastle Project. Prospect scale schematic cross sections (A-A' and B-B') with results from recently drilled holes SDDRE016 and SDDRE017 To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_sxgc-fig4.jpg Figure 5: Redcastle Project Scale Geology. Geological section C-C' line presented with key prospects. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_009full.jpg Figure 6: Redcastle Project Idealized Geological Cross Section (C-C'). Schematic not to scale. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_010full.jpg Figure 7: Location of the Redcastle Gold-Antimony Project, along with the 100% owned Sunday Creek Project. To view an enhanced version of this graphic, please visit: https://images.newsfilecorp.com/files/11541/305229_a477600464d2eb23_011full.jpg Table 1: Drill collar summary table for recent drill holes in progress. Hole IDDepth (m)ProspectEast GDA94 Z55North GDA94 Z55Elevation (m)DipAzimuth GDA94 Z55SDDRE016410.45Redcastle3027355927298217-50.367.7SDDRE017359.8Beautiful Venus305388.65926618206.62-50.968.9Table 2: All individual assays reported from SDDRE016 and SDDRE017 reported here >0.1g/t AuEq. Individual assay and sample intervals are reported to two decimal places. Hole numberFrom (m)To (m)Interval (m)Au g/tSb %AuEq g/tSDDRE01611.2611.760.50.130.0020.14SDDRE01672.9873.090.110.230.0020.23SDDRE016102.24102.530.290.510.0030.52SDDRE016102.95103.30.350.10.0020.1SDDRE016103.3103.40.12.120.814.06SDDRE016103.4104.330.930.040.0360.13SDDRE016104.33104.430.10.240.0040.25SDDRE016110.13110.40.270.170.0020.17SDDRE016110.4110.790.390.460.0010.46SDDRE016110.79110.910.120.710.0010.71SDDRE016110.91111.260.352.480.0042.49SDDRE016111.26111.80.540.370.0020.38SDDRE016111.8112.380.580.120.0020.13SDDRE016112.38112.80.420.240.0020.24SDDRE016112.8112.980.180.340.0010.34SDDRE016112.98113.120.1426.20.00726.22SDDRE016154.45154.550.11.050.0641.2SDDRE016154.55154.740.190.380.0240.44SDDRE016168.45168.560.110.50.0010.5SDDRE016179.6179.710.110.510.0030.52SDDRE016181.45181.780.330.910.0040.92SDDRE016185.92186.710.790.340.0020.35SDDRE016263.73263.830.10.30.0020.31SDDRE016294.11294.210.14.980.335.77SDDRE016310.34310.450.110.450.0090.47SDDRE016311.05311.220.170.580.0030.59SDDRE016311.22311.420.20.620.0060.63SDDRE016311.42311.720.30.20.0030.21SDDRE016311.72312.821.10.10.0040.11SDDRE016321.84322.060.2215.40.02615.46SDDRE016322.59322.70.110.750.0050.76SDDRE016329.16329.270.110.310.0020.32SDDRE016329.57329.780.214.80.0054.81SDDRE016331.14331.310.170.130.0020.14SDDRE016332.4333.51.10.10.0020.1SDDRE016334.5334.640.142.840.0022.84SDDRE016337.62337.850.230.470.0040.48SDDRE016338.18338.30.120.630.0040.64SDDRE016344.11344.340.230.790.0040.8SDDRE016351.06351.320.260.770.0040.78SDDRE016363.27363.840.570.180.0020.18SDDRE016390.4391.20.80.15E-040.1SDDRE016394.48394.750.270.290.0010.29SDDRE01766.3366.570.240.160.0020.16SDDRE017100.5101.410.910.140.0010.14SDDRE017101.41101.730.320.150.0030.16SDDRE017140.711410.290.910.0020.91JORC Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data CriteriaJORC Code explanationCommentarySampling techniquesNature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialized industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc.). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.Aspects of the determination of mineralization that are Material to the Public Report.In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverized to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralization types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.Sampling has been conducted on drill core (half core for >90% and quarter core for check samples), grab samples (field samples of in-situ bedrock and boulders; including duplicate samples), trench samples (rock chips, including duplicates) and soil samples (including duplicate samples). Locations of field samples were obtained by using a GPS, generally to an accuracy of within 5 metres. Drill hole and trench locations have been confirmed to <1 metre using a differential GPS. Samples locations have also been verified by plotting locations on the high-resolution Lidar mapsDrill core is marked for cutting and cut using an automated diamond saw used by Company staff in Kilmore. Samples are bagged at the core saw and transported to the Bendigo On Site Laboratory for assay. At On Site samples are crushed using a jaw crusher combined with a rotary splitter and a 1 kg split is separated for pulverizing (LM5) and assay.Standard fire assay techniques are used for gold assay on a 30 g charge by experienced staff (used to dealing with high sulfide and stibnite-rich charges). On Site gold method by fire assay code PE01S.Screen fire assay is used to understand gold grain-size distribution where coarse gold is evident.ICP-OES is used to analyse the aqua regia digested pulp for an additional 12 elements (method BM011) and over-range antimony is measured using flame AAS (method known as B050).Soil samples were sieved in the field and an 80-mesh sample bagged and transported to ALS Global laboratories in Brisbane for super-low level gold analysis on a 50 g samples by method ST44 (using aqua regia and ICP-MS).Grab and rock chip samples are generally submitted to On Site Laboratories for standard fire assay and 12 element ICP-OES as described above.Drilling techniquesDrill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc.).HQ or NQ diameter diamond drill core, oriented using Axis Champ orientation tool with the orientation line marked on the base of the drill core by the driller/offsider. A standard 3 metre core barrel has been found to be most effective in both the hard and soft rocks in the project.Drill sample recoveryMethod of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.Core recoveries were maximized using HQ or NQ diamond drill core with careful control over water pressure to maintain soft-rock integrity and prevent loss of fines from soft drill core. Recoveries are determined on a metre-by-metre basis in the core shed using a tape measure against marked up drill core checking against driller's core blocks.Plots of grade versus recovery and RQD (described below) show no trends relating to loss of drill core, or fines.LoggingWhether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.Geotechnical logging of the drill core takes place on racks in the company core shed. Core orientations marked at the drill rig are checked for consistency, and base of core orientation lines are marked on core where two or more orientations match within 10 degrees. Core recoveries are measured for each metre RQD measurements (cumulative quantity of core sticks > 10 cm in a metre) are made on a metre-by-metre basis.Each tray of drill core is photographed (wet and dry) after it is fully marked up for sampling and cutting.The ½ core cutting line is placed approximately 10 degrees above the orientation line so the orientation line is retained in the core tray for future work.Geological logging of drill core includes the following parameters: Rock types, lithology Alteration Structural information (orientations of veins, bedding, fractures using standard alpha-beta measurements from orientation line; or, in the case of un-oriented parts of the core, the alpha angles are measured) Veining (quartz, carbonate, stibnite) Key minerals (visible under hand lens, e.g. gold, stibnite)100% of drill core is logged for all components described above into the company MX logging database.Logging is fully quantitative, although the description of lithology and alteration relies on visible observations by trained geologists.Each tray of drill core is photographed (wet and dry) after it is fully marked up for sampling and cutting.Logging is considered to be at an appropriate quantitative standard to use in future studies.Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparationIf core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples.Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.Drill core is typically half-core sampled using an Almonte core saw. The drill core orientation line is retained.Quarter core is used when taking sampling duplicates (termed FDUP in the database).Sampling representivity is maximized by always taking the same side of the drill core (whenever oriented), and consistently drawing a cut line on the core where orientation is not possible. The field technician draws these lines.Sample sizes are maximized for coarse gold by using half core, and using quarter core and half core splits (laboratory duplicates) allows an estimation of nugget effect.In mineralized rock the company uses approximately 10% of ¼ core duplicates, certified reference materials (suitable OREAS materials), laboratory sample duplicates and instrument repeats.In the soil sampling program duplicates were obtained every 20th sample and the laboratory inserted low-level gold standards regularly into the sample flow.Quality of assay data and laboratory testsThe nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.The fire assay technique for gold used by On Site is a globally recognized method, and over-range follow-ups including gravimetric finish and screen fire assay are standard. Of significance at the On Site laboratory is the presence of fire assay personnel who are experienced in dealing with high sulfide charges (especially those with high stibnite contents) - this substantially reduces the risk of inaccurate reporting in complex sulfide-gold charges.Where screen fire assay is used, this assay will be reported instead of the original fire assay. The ICP-OES technique is a standard analytical technique for assessing elemental concentrations. The digest used (aqua regia) is excellent for the dissolution of sulfides (in this case generally stibnite, pyrite and trace arsenopyrite), but other silicate-hosted elements, in particular vanadium (V), may only be partially dissolved. These silicate-hosted elements are not important in the determination of the quantity of gold, antimony, arsenic or sulphur.A portable XRF has been used in a qualitative manner on drill core to ensure appropriate core samples have been taken (no pXRF data are reported or included in the MX database).Acceptable levels of accuracy and precision have been established using the following methods ¼ duplicates - half core is split into quarters and given separate sample numbers (commonly in mineralized core) - low to medium gold grades indicate strong correlation, dropping as the gold grade increases over 40 g/t Au. Blanks - blanks are inserted after visible gold and in strongly mineralized rocks to confirm that the crushing and pulping are not affected by gold smearing onto the crusher and LM5 swing mill surfaces. Results are excellent, generally below detection limit and a single sample at 0.03 g/t Au. Certified Reference Materials - OREAS CRMs have been used throughout the project including blanks, low (<1 g/t Au), medium (up to 5 g/t Au) and high-grade gold samples (> 5 g/t Au). Results are automatically checked on data import into the MX database to fall within 2 standard deviations of the expected value. Laboratory splits - On Site conducts splits of both coarse crush and pulp duplicates as quality control and reports all data. In particular, high Au samples have the most repeats. Laboratory CRMs - On Site regularly inserts their own CRM materials into the process flow and reports all data Laboratory precision - duplicate measurements of solutions (both Au from fire assay and other elements from the aqua regia digests) are made regularly by the laboratory and reported.Accuracy and precision have been determined carefully by using the sampling and measurement techniques described above during the sampling (accuracy) and laboratory (accuracy and precision) stages of the analysis.Soil sample company duplicates and laboratory certified reference materials all fall within expected ranges.Verification of sampling and assayingThe verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.The use of twinned holes.Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.Discuss any adjustment to assay data.The Independent Geologist has visited the project drill sites and inspected drill core held at the Kilmore core shed.Visual inspection of drill intersections matches both the geological descriptions in the database and the expected assay data (for example, gold and stibnite visible in drill core is matched by high Au and Sb results in assays).In addition, on receipt of results Company geologists assess the gold, antimony and arsenic results to verify that the intersections returned expected data.The electronic data storage in the MX database is of a high standard. Primary logging data are entered directly by the geologists and field technicians and the assay data are electronically matched against sample number on return from the laboratory.Certified reference materials, ¼ core field duplicates (FDUP), laboratory splits and duplicates and instrument repeats are all recorded in the database.Adjustments to assay data are recorded by MX, and none are present (or required).Twinned drill holes are not available at this stage of the project.Location of data pointsAccuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.Specification of the grid system used.Quality and adequacy of topographic control.Differential GPS used to locate drill collars, trenches and some workingsStandard GPS for some field locations (grab and soils samples), verified against Lidar data.The grid system used throughout is Geocentric datum of Australia 1994; Map Grid Zone 55 (GDA94_Z55), also referred to as ELSG 28355. Reported azimuths also relate to MGA55 (GDA94_Z55).Topographic control is excellent owing to sub 10 cm accuracy from Lidar data.Data spacing and distributionData spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.Whether sample compositing has been applied.The data spacing is suitable for reporting of exploration results - evidence for this is based on the improving predictability of high-grade gold-antimony intersections.At this time, the data spacing and distribution are not sufficient for the reporting of Mineral Resource Estimates. This however may change as knowledge of grade controls increase with future drill programs.Samples have not been composited. All individual assays above 0.1 g/t AuEq have been reported to two decimal places with no compositing in table 2. Orientation of data in relation to geological structureWhether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.The true thickness of the mineralized intervals reported are interpreted to be approximately 70-85% of the sampled thickness. Drilling is oriented in an optimum direction when considering the combination of host rock orientation and apparent vein control on gold and antimony grade. The steep nature of some of the veins may give increases in apparent thickness of some intersections, but more drilling is required to quantify.A sampling bias is not evident from the data collected to date (drill holes cut across mineralized structures at a moderate angle).Sample securityThe measures taken to ensure sample security.Drill core is delivered to the Kilmore core logging shed by either the drill contractor or company field staff. Samples are marked up and cut by company staff at the Kilmore core shed, in an automated diamond saw and bagged before loaded onto strapped secured pallets and trucked by company staff to Bendigo for submission to the laboratory. There is no evidence in any stage of the process, or in the data for any sample security issues.Audits or reviewsThe results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.Continuous monitoring of CRM results, blanks and duplicates is undertaken by geologists and the company data geologist. Mr Kenneth Bush for SXG has the orientation, logging and assay data.Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results CriteriaJORC Code explanationCommentaryMineral tenement and land tenure statusType, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings.The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area.The Redcastle Project comprises three granted exploration licences in central Victoria, Australia: EL5546, EL7498 and EL7499. All three are held by SXG Victoria Pty Ltd, a 100% subsidiary of Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd (SXGC)The tenements are in good standing with no known impediments. Most of the project area covers Rushworth-Heathcote State Forest (Crown land), adjacent to but not within the Heathcote-Graytown National Park. Some private land occurs on the eastern side of the main tenement, and the south-west portion is approximately 90% private smallholdings. SXGC engages with the Taungurung Land & Waters Council under a dedicated Indigenous People's Policy, with cultural clearances completed on all drill sites prior to disturbance.Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties.Mining at Redcastle commenced in 1859 with alluvial workings, transitioning to reef mining where the Welcome Group of mines reportedly produced 20,583 oz at 254.6 g/t Au over 2 km of strike from 1859 to 1865, and the Redcastle Gold Mining Company produced 35,000 oz at 33 g/t Au from Clarke's Reef (Lidgey, E.F. (1898), Special Report on the Redcastle Goldfield, Victorian Department of Mines (GSV document G21967); and Victorian Department of Mines Annual Reports (1859-1865). Production figures are historical, unverified by SXGC, and do not constitute a JORC 2012 or NI 43-101 compliant estimate). Since the introduction of the Exploration Licence system in 1965, fourteen ELs have covered ground within the current Redcastle Project. Documented modern exploration includes RC drilling (47 holes for 1,785 m), RAB drilling (31 holes for 155 m), rock chip and soil sampling (101 and 228 samples respectively), and 137 costeans with 3,731 costean samples carried out across various tenements (notably EL4594, MIN4594 and EL3316) between 2005 and 2011. Nagambie Resources Limited conducted first-pass exploration drilling prior to Core Prospecting Pty Ltd acquiring PL6415 (Laura), where Core Prospecting subsequently drilled 16 diamond holes for 1,923.2 m in 2019. SXGC (via its predecessor subsidiary Mawson Victoria Pty Ltd) commenced systematic exploration in 2020.Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style ofmineralization.Refer to the description in the main body of the release.Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the followinginformation for all Material drill holes:easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collardip and azimuth of the holedown hole length and interception depth hole length.If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.Refer to tables in the main body of the release.Data aggregation methodsIn reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high-grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated.Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.See "Further Information" and "Metal Equivalent Calculation" in main text of press release.Relationship between mineralization widths and intercept lengthsThese relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results.If the geometry of the mineralization with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g 'down holelength, true width not known').See reporting of true widths in the body of the press release.DiagramsAppropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.The results of the diamond drilling are displayed in the figures in the announcement.Balanced reportingWhere comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high-grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.All results above 0.1 g/t AuEq have been tabulated in this announcement. The results are considered representative with no intended bias.Core loss, where material, is disclosed in tabulated drill intersections.Other substantive exploration dataOther exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.SXGC and predecessor Mawson Victoria have completed an extensive geophysical and remote-sensing programme over the Redcastle Project, including: ground magnetics, high-density ground gravity, gradient array IP, offset dipole-dipole IP and a 58 km² LiDAR survey which has identified over 40,000 hard rock and alluvial workings through machine learning. Reconnaissance soil and rock chip sampling at the Black Squall prospect has returned anomalous results including 0.36 g/t Au and 63 ppm Sb in soil, and float samples to 73 g/t Au and 3,500 ppm Sb. Hyperspectral analysis of drill core has been undertaken to define alteration anomalies and develop a 'near-miss' vector model.Further workThe nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling).Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.Planned further work at Redcastle includes additional diamond drilling programmes beyond the high-grade Laura intercepts into the approximately 17 km of untested reef systems at Redcastle, where extensive vein strike remains untested below the water table (~50 m average depth) and under approximately 50% alluvial cover. To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/305229 Source: Southern Cross Gold Consolidated Ltd. Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs. Contact Us |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:51
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
Generac Announces Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Release Date and Conference Call | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
WAUKESHA, Wis., July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Generac Holdings Inc. ("Generac") (NYSE: GNRC), a leading global designer, manufacturer, and provider of energy technology solutions and other power products, today announced plans to release its second quarter 2026 financial results before the market opens on Wednesday, July 29th, 2026. Generac management will hold a conference call at 10:00 a.m. EDT on that day to discuss highlights of this earnings release.A webcast of the conference call can be accessed at the following link: https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/zrzjabf4 The webcast of the conference call will also be available on Generac’s website (http://www.generac.com), under the Investor Relations link. The webcast link will be made available on the Company’s website prior to the start of the call within the Events section of the Investor Relations website. Following the live webcast, a replay will be available on the Company's website. About Generac Generac is a total energy solutions company that empowers people to use energy on their own terms. Founded in 1959, Generac is a leading global designer, manufacturer, and provider of a wide range of energy technology solutions. The Company provides power generation equipment, energy storage systems, energy management devices & solutions, and other power products and services serving the residential, commercial, data center, telecom, rental, and industrial markets. Generac introduced the first affordable backup generator and later created the automatic home standby generator category. The Company’s broad portfolio of energy technology offerings for homes and businesses enables its mission to Power a Smarter World and lead the evolution to more resilient, efficient, and innovative energy solutions. SOURCE: Generac Holdings Inc. CONTACT: Kris Rosemann Director – Corporate Finance & Investor Relations (262) 506-6064 [email protected] |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:49
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:28
26d ago
|
Akamai Research: Commerce Becomes the Epicenter for AI Bot Attacks and Agentic Fraud in 2026 | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Commerce faces rising AI bot activity, escalating DDoS attacks, and new fraud tactics July 15, 2026 06:28 ET | Source: Akamai Technologies, Inc.CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- An evolution toward agentic commerce and autonomous AI tools has made commerce the world’s most targeted industry by cybercriminals, according to the latest Akamai (NASDAQ: AKAM) State of the Internet (SOTI) security report, Securing the Agentic Storefront: Attacks on Commerce. The report highlights that, as of December 2025, nearly half (47.9%) of all commerce traffic across Akamai’s global network now consists of AI bots. Furthermore, the industry continues to suffer a relentless barrage of application-layer (Layer 7) distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) activity, malicious web application exploits, and a dangerous narrowing of the gap between traditional application attacks and API-targeted exploits. “We are securing a digital frontier where the ‘customer’ is increasingly an AI agent operating on behalf of the human user,” said Patrick Sullivan, Chief Technology Officer of Security Strategy at Akamai. “This report reveals how and why security leaders must embrace ‘agentic readiness,’ to architect sites that welcome legitimate AI while aggressively shutting down malicious bots.” Additional key findings include: The rise of agentic commerce fraud: Autonomous AI shopping agents are creating a signal masking problem by perfectly mimicking human microbehaviors, according to guest contributor Pam Lindemoen, Chief Security Officer and Vice President of Strategy at RH-ISAC. Threat actors are now using agent hijacking tactics to compromise legitimate AI assistants and abuse stored payment credentials. They are also deploying large language models (LLMs) to create synthetic identity fraud in the form of “Frankenstein” accounts that easily bypass static defenses.The unchecked influx of AI bots: Driven by LLM development, AI training crawlers account for more than 70% of AI bot triggers in commerce. OpenAI, ByteDance, and Anthropic rank as the top three AI bots observed. Commerce organizations placed more than 90% of their AI bot activity in the “monitor” category but allowed three-quarters of the remaining activity to pass unrestricted, exposing themselves to underlying risks.API exposure and vulnerabilities: Web attacks targeting APIs rose by 9% year over year. In fact, Akamai’s 2026 API Security Impact Study revealed that 85% of commerce respondents experienced at least one API-related incident in the past year, yet only 22% know which of their APIs expose sensitive data.Layer 7 DDoS attacks escalate: Commerce was targeted by Layer 7 DDoS attacks nearly 3 trillion times in 2025, with the retail vertical bearing 84% of that volume. Attackers are using HTTP botnets to flood APIs during high-stakes holiday surges and exhaust app servers and halt sales.Industrialized phishing and malware pipelines: Between November 2025 and April 2026, malware represented 56.5% of observed endpoint threat activity, followed by phishing at 37.6%. Average daily phishing volume across commerce customers skyrocketed from 56,600 in February to 134,600 in April, serving as the primary raw material powering account takeover (ATO) and loyalty point theft. Regional trends Automated bot activity and web attacks varied by region: North America and EMEA: These mature markets saw modest bot increases (7% and 16%, respectively) but significant holiday-driven web attacks, with North America leading AI bot activity with 33 billion counts.APAC and LATAM: Bot activity surged by 63% in APAC and 48% in LATAM. APAC’s fragmented travel market and loyalty programs made it a primary target for bot and Layer 7 DDoS attacks. Mitigation strategies To effectively counter these evolving threats, Securing the Agentic Storefront: Attacks on Commerce provides a strategic roadmap for CISOs. Recommendations include: Map the revenue chain: Continuously discover and inventory the API estate to clear up critical visibility gaps regarding sensitive data exposure.Govern automation: Move away from binary “allow/block” models toward risk-based governance that categorizes bots by intent and business value.Minimize the blast radius: Implement microsegmentation to eliminate lateral movement. Although 92% of organizations use basic network segmentation, only 35% have progressed to true microsegmentation.Establish cooperative resilience: Integrate cybersecurity and fraud prevention teams to deploy real-time behavioral biometrics, risk-based multi-factor authentication, and automated kill switches to freeze compromised accounts instantly. Now in their 12th year, Akamai SOTI Security reports continue to offer critical insights on cybersecurity trends and web performance, drawn from attacks viewed across Akamai’s cybersecurity protective infrastructure, which handles a significant portion of global web traffic. About Akamai Akamai is the cybersecurity and cloud computing company that powers and protects business online. Our market-leading security solutions, superior threat intelligence, and global operations team provide defense in depth to safeguard enterprise data and applications everywhere. Akamai’s full-stack cloud computing solutions deliver performance and affordability on the world’s most distributed platform. Global enterprises trust Akamai to provide the industry-leading reliability, scale, and expertise they need to grow their business with confidence. Learn more at akamai.com and akamai.com/blog, or follow Akamai Technologies on X and LinkedIn. Contacts Akamai Media Relations [email protected] Akamai Investor Relations [email protected] |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:49
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:17
26d ago
|
$HUBG Investor Loss Alert: Hub Group Investors may have been Misled after Financial Restatement Announcements Lead to 18% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Hub Group Inc. (NASDAQ:HUBG) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in Hub Group, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the HUBG ($HUBG) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 28, 2026Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Hub Group’s financial results, revenue recognition, accounting of costs, internal controls, and prospects for/drivers of growthLargest Stock Drop: February 6, 2026 – 18% Stock DropCourt: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisFiling Law Firm: Bleichmar Fonti & Auld (“BFA Law”)Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Investors have until August 28, 2026, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Hub Group securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. It is captioned Lawler v. Hub Group, Inc., No. 1:26-cv-07596. Why is Hub Group Being Sued for Securities Fraud? Hub Group is a transportation and logistics freight carrier that provides trucking and related services to operators across the supply chain. Hub Group services a customer base extending across various industries, including retail, consumer products, automotive, and durable goods, and reports to be one of the largest freight transportation providers in North America. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements concerning the premature and incorrect revenue recognition of certain transactions, the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable, the effectiveness of internal controls, and the Hub Group’s drivers of financial results and growth. Why did Hub Group’s Stock Drop? On February 5, 2026, Hub Group announced that the Company’s financial statements for the first three quarters of 2025 should not be relied upon and would be restated due to “an error that resulted in the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable in the first nine months of 2025.” Hub Group revealed that its reports for those quarters “were in each case materially misstated due to the aforementioned error and should no longer be relied upon” and that “the Company [wa]s also continuing to assess the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and appropriate remediation steps.” Hub Group also estimated that “[t]he total amount of the reduction to accounts payable and purchased transportation costs related to this issue that was recorded during these periods is $77 million.” This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline roughly 18%, from $51.33 per share at close on February 5, 2026, to $41.96 per share at close on February 6, 2026. On May 12, 2026, Hub Group announced that it had “identified certain transactions that were prematurely or incorrectly recognized or not adequately supported,” causing its 2023 and 2024 annual reports filed with the SEC to be “materially misstated,” such that they “should no longer be relied upon.” Hub Group did not quantify the expected misstatement, although it “expect[ed] to conclude that it did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.” This news caused the price of Hub Group stock to decline a further 13%, from $41.86 per share at close on May 11, 2026, to $36.62 per share at close on May 12, 2026. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Hub Group, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/hub-group-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:48
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 04:59
26d ago
|
Insulet Corporation Sued for Securities Law Violations - Contact the DJS Law Group to Discuss Your Rights - PODD | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- The DJS Law Group reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Insulet Corporation ("Insulet" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: PODD) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Shareholders who purchased shares of PODD during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery. CLASS PERIOD: February 21, 2025 to May 26, 2026 DEADLINE: August 31, 2026 CASE DETAILS: According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Insulet failed to maintain appropriate controls over its manufacturing processes. The Company's manufacturing problems created safety risks for its customers. Based on these facts, Insulet's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, contact us to participate. WHY DJS LAW GROUP? DJS Law Group's primary focus is to enhance investor return through balanced counseling and aggressive advocacy. We specialize in securities class actions, corporate governance litigation, and domestic/international M&A appraisals. Our clients are some of the largest and most sophisticated hedge funds and alternative asset managers in the world. The litigation claims of our clients are extraordinarily valuable assets that demand respect, focus, and results. Join the case to recover your losses. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics. CONTACT: David J. Schwartz DJS Law Group 274 White Plains Road, Suite 1 Eastchester, NY 10709 Phone: 914-206-9742 Email: [email protected] SOURCE DJS Law Group LLP |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:48
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:06
26d ago
|
$PODD Investor Loss Alert: Insulet Investors may have been Misled after Safety Issues Lead to 6% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ:PODD) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in Insulet, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/insulet-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the Insulet ($PODD) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 31, 2026Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to the safety of Insulet’s Omnipod productsLargest Alleged Stock Drop: March 12, 2026 – 6.88% Stock DropCourt: U.S. District Court for the District of MassachusettsTake Action: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Insulet investors have until August 31, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Insulet securities. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. It is captioned Hu v. Insulet Corporation et al., No. 26-cv-13062. Why is Insulet Being Sued for Securities Fraud? Insulet is primarily engaged in the development, manufacture, and sale of insulin delivery systems for people with insulin-dependent diabetes through its Omnipod platform. The Omnipod platform includes: the Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System (“Omnipod 5”), the Omnipod DASH® Insulin Management System (“Omnipod DASH”), and the Omnipod Insulin Management System (“Omnipod Eros”). Throughout the relevant period, Insulet misrepresented the safety of its Omnipod products as well as its ability to efficiently produce “medical grade quality at consumer electronic scale.” In reality, certain of Insulet’s products suffered from undisclosed manufacturing defects that put patient safety at risk. Why did Insulet’s Stock Drop? On March 12, 2026, Insulet disclosed that a manufacturing issue with its Omnipod® 5 Pods caused a “tear in the internal tubing that delivers insulin” resulting in insulin being released inside the Pod “instead of being fully infused into the body as intended.” Accordingly, Insulet “initiated a voluntary Medical Device Correction for specific lots of Omnipod® 5 Pods.” This news caused the price of Insulet stock to drop $16.23 per share, or 6.88%, from a closing price of $236.07 per share on March 12, 2026, to $219.84 per share on March 13, 2026. On May 26, 2026, Insulet announced another voluntary Medical Device Correction due to a manufacturing issue, this time to its Omnipod 5, Omnipod DASH, and Omnipod Eros systems. It again indicated that the manufacturing issue resulted in a tear in the tubing which “could result in insulin under-delivery.” This news caused the price of Insulet stock to drop $7.79 per share, or 5.07%, from a closing price of $218.11 per share on May 26, 2026, to $146.01 per share on May 27, 2026. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/insulet-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Insulet, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/insulet-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/insulet-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:48
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:00
26d ago
|
HCA Healthcare's Warning Prices In All The Bad News (Upgrade) | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
5.58K FollowersAnalyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:46
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:18
26d ago
|
$ENSG Investor Loss Alert: Ensign Investors may have been Misled after Regulatory Issues Lead to 8% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces an investigation into The Ensign Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENSG) for potential securities fraud after significant stock drops.If you invested in Ensign, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the Ensign ($ENSG) Class Action Investigation: Investigation Overview: Securities fraud relating to Ensign’s misrepresentations about care quality at the company’s nursing facilities, as well as Ensign’s growth, margins, and regulatory complianceStock Declines: June 8, 2026 – 8.2% Stock Drop; June 10, 2027 – 3% Stock DropAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Why is Ensign Being Investigated for Securities Fraud? Ensign is a healthcare services company that operates skilled nursing, senior living, and rehabilitative care facilities through a network of affiliated providers. Ensign relies heavily on Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, making government funding and regulatory compliance central to Ensign’s business model. BFA is investigating whether Ensign misled investors about the quality of care at its facilities, as well as Ensign’s growth, margins, and regulatory compliance. Why did Ensign’s Stock Drop? On June 8, 2026, Hunterbrook Capital published a research report titled “Ensign: The Nursing Home Empire Built on Fatal Neglect” based on a five month investigation that alleged “Ensign’s profits can be traced to providing less care than its patients need – and less care than it is meant to provide based on the tax dollars it receives from the government.” According to Hunterbrook, Ensign padded its profit margin by understaffing its facilities while routing Medicare and Medicaid payments to affiliate entities owned or controlled by Ensign. This news caused the price of Ensign stock to decline $13.88 per share, or 8.2%, from a closing price of $170.30 per share on June 5, 2026, to $156.42 per share on June 8, 2026. On June 11, 2026, Muddy Waters Research published a research report titled “Ensign: Deceiving the Government at Estimated ~20% of Facilities” which alleged that Ensign “rents” required nursing-home administrator licenses from off-site administrators that do not actually oversee its facilities to create the appearance of regulatory compliance. According to Muddy Waters, genuine regulatory compliance would significantly reduce Ensign’s profitability. On this news, the price of Ensign stock declined $4.52 per share, or 3%, from a closing price of $151.65 per share on June 10, 2026, to $147.13 per share on June 11, 2026. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Ensign, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/ensign-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:44
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:30
26d ago
|
First Horizon Corporation Delivers Strong Second Quarter 2026 Results with Net Income Available to Common Shareholders of $260 Million, up 12% year-over-year and EPS of $0.54, up $0.09 from Second Quarter 2025 | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- First Horizon Corporation (NYSE: FHN or "First Horizon") today reported second quarter net income available to common shareholders ("NIAC") of $260 million or earnings per share of $0.54, compared with first quarter 2026 NIAC of $257 million or earnings per share of $0.53 and second quarter 2025 NIAC of $233 million or earnings per share of $0.45. Return on common equity and return on tangible common equity grew to 12.3% and 15.2%, respectively, in the quarter.*"Our results represent another quarter of disciplined execution," said Chairman, President and CEO Bryan Jordan. "This performance is the result of our focus on developing client relationships and prioritizing and delivering outstanding service." Jordan continued, "Compared to the first half of 2025, net income available to common shareholders grew 16% in the first half of 2026. This reflects strength across multiple aspects of our business and includes 3% year-over-year loan growth." Conference Call Information Analysts, investors and interested parties may call toll-free starting at 8:15 a.m. CT on July 15, 2026, by dialing 1-833-461-5787 (if calling from the U.S.) and entering access code 702071053. The conference call will begin at 8:30 a.m. CT. Participants can also opt to listen to the live audio webcast at https://ir.firsthorizon.com/events-and-presentations/default.aspx. A replay of the webcast will be available on our website on July 15 and will be archived on the site for one year. Forward-Looking Statements This document and the complete 2Q2026 earnings release to which it relates contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to FHN's beliefs, plans, goals, expectations, and estimates. Forward-looking statements are not a representation of historical information, but instead pertain to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments. Forward-looking statements often use words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "should," "is likely," "will," "going forward," and other similar expressions that indicate future events and trends. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, operational, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond FHN's control, and many of which, with respect to future business decisions and actions (including acquisitions and divestitures), are subject to change and could cause FHN's actual future results and outcomes to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements or historical performance. While there is no assurance that any list of uncertainties and contingencies is complete, examples of factors which could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated by forward-looking statements or historical performance include those mentioned: in this document; in Items 2.02 and 7.01 of FHN's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this release; in the forepart, and in Items 1, 1A, and 7, of FHN's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K; and in the forepart, and in Item 1A of Part II, of FHN's Quarterly Report(s) on Form 10-Q filed after that Annual Report. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of FHN speak only as of the date they are made, and FHN assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements that are made in this document or in any other statement, release, report, or filing from time to time. Actual results could differ and expectations could change, possibly materially, because of one or more factors, including those factors listed in this document or the documents mentioned above, or other factors not listed. Throughout this document and the complete 2Q2026 earnings release to which it relates, numbers may not total due to rounding, references to EPS are fully diluted, and capital ratios for the most recent quarter are estimates. Use of non-GAAP Measures and Regulatory Measures that are not GAAP Certain measures included in this document and the complete 2Q2026 earnings release to which it relates are "non-GAAP," meaning they are not presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. and also are not codified in U.S. banking regulations currently applicable to FHN. Although other entities may use calculation methods that differ from those used by FHN for non-GAAP measures, FHN's management believes such measures are relevant to understanding the financial condition, capital position, and financial results of FHN and its business segments. Non-GAAP measures are reported to FHN's management and Board of Directors through various internal reports. The non-GAAP measures presented in this document and the complete 2Q2026 earnings release to which it relates are fully taxable equivalent measures, pre-provision net revenue ("PPNR"), return on average tangible common equity ("ROTCE"), tangible common equity ("TCE") to tangible assets ("TA"), tangible book value ("TBV") per common share, and various consolidated and segment results and performance measures and ratios adjusted for notable items. Presentation of regulatory measures, even those which are not GAAP, provides a meaningful basis for comparability to other financial institutions subject to the same regulations as FHN, as demonstrated by their use by banking regulators in reviewing capital adequacy of financial institutions. Although not GAAP terms, these regulatory measures are not considered "non-GAAP" under U.S. financial reporting rules as long as their presentation conforms to regulatory standards. Regulatory measures used in this financial supplement include: common equity tier 1 capital ("CET1"), generally defined as common equity less goodwill, other intangibles, and certain other required regulatory deductions; tier 1 capital, generally defined as the sum of core capital (including common equity and instruments that cannot be redeemed at the option of the holder) adjusted for certain items under risk based capital regulations; and risk-weighted assets, which is a measure of total on- and off-balance sheet assets adjusted for credit and market risk, used to determine regulatory capital ratios. Refer to the tabular reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures and presentation of the most comparable GAAP items, beginning on page 20 of FHN's complete 2Q26 earnings release available at https://ir.firsthorizon.com. First Horizon Corp. (NYSE: FHN), with $84.4 billion in assets as of June 30, 2026, is a leading regional financial services company, dedicated to helping our clients, communities and associates unlock their full potential with capital and counsel. Headquartered in Memphis, TN, the banking subsidiary First Horizon Bank operates in 12 states concentrated in the southern U.S. The Company and its subsidiaries offer commercial, private banking, consumer, small business, wealth and trust management, retail brokerage, capital markets, fixed income, and mortgage banking services. First Horizon has been recognized as one of the nation's best employers by Fortune and Forbes magazines and a Top 10 Most Reputable U.S. Bank. More information is available at www.FirstHorizon.com. Contact: Investor Relations - [email protected] Media Relations - [email protected] * "Adjusted" results, along with return on tangible common equity, tangible book value per share, and certain other financial measures, are non-GAAP financial measures. All references to loans include leases. All references to earnings per share are based on diluted shares. NII, total revenue, NIM, and PPNR are presented on a fully taxable equivalent ("FTE") basis. Capital ratios are preliminary. Please see page 4 of our complete 2Q26 earnings release for information on our use of non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation of these measures to GAAP beginning on page 20 of that release. SOURCE First Horizon Corporation |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:39
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:30
26d ago
|
Archrock Announces Timing for Second Quarter 2026 Results | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
July 15, 2026 06:30 ET | Source: ArchrockHOUSTON, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Archrock, Inc. (NYSE:AROC) (“Archrock”) will host a conference call on Wednesday, August 5, 2026, to discuss its second quarter 2026 financial and operating results. The call will begin at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time. Archrock will release its second quarter 2026 earnings report prior to the conference call. To listen to the call via a live webcast, please visit Archrock’s website at www.archrock.com. The call will also be available by dialing 1 (833) 461-5787 in the United States, or 1 (585) 542-9983 for international calls. The meeting ID is 670 342 078. A replay of the webcast will be available for 90 days on Archrock’s website shortly after the call. About Archrock Archrock is an energy infrastructure company with a primary focus on midstream natural gas compression and a commitment to helping its customers produce, compress and transport natural gas in a safe and environmentally responsible way. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Archrock is a premier provider of natural gas compression services to customers in the energy industry throughout the U.S. and a leading supplier of aftermarket services to customers that own compression equipment. For more information on how the Company embodies its purpose, WE POWER A CLEANER AMERICATM, visit www.archrock.com. SOURCE: Archrock, Inc. For information, contact: Megan Repine Vice President, Investor Relations (281) 836-8360 [email protected] |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:38
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:32
26d ago
|
PNC Reports Second Quarter 2026 Net Income of $2.1 Billion, $4.81 Diluted EPS or $4.85 as Adjusted | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Generated record revenue, net interest income and fee income Increased quarterly common stock dividend 30 cents, or 18%, to $2.00 per share PITTSBURGH, July 15, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (NYSE: PNC) today reported: For the quarter In millions, except per share data and as noted 2Q26 1Q26 2Q25 Second Quarter Highlights Financial Results Comparisons reflect 2Q26 vs. 1Q26 Net interest income (NII) $ 4,107 $ 3,961 $ 3,555 Income Statement Adjusted EPS was $4.85 which excludes the net impact of FirstBank integration costs and 2Q26significant items, resulting in a 4 cent reduction to EPS Generated 3% positive operating leverage; PPNR increased 16%; ROTCE of 17.9% NII increased 4%; NIM of 2.96% increased 1 bp Fee income increased 10%, driven by strong capital markets activity Noninterest expense of $4.1 billion included $140 million of PNC Foundation contribution expense, $121 million of integration expenses and the impact of increased business activity Balance Sheet Average loans increased $12.3 billion, or 4% Average deposits were stable Average noninterest-bearing deposits grew 4% Rate paid on interest-bearing deposits declined 5 basis points Net loan charge-offs were $226 million, or 0.25% annualized to average loans Maintained strong capital position CET1 capital ratio of 9.9% Returned $1.3 billion to shareholders, including $0.6 billion of share repurchases Increased quarterly common stock dividend 30 cents, or 18% to $2.00 per share Converted FirstBank customers, employees, systems and branches as of June 22, 2026 Fee income (non-GAAP) 2,279 2,079 1,894 Other noninterest income 489 125 212 Noninterest income 2,768 2,204 2,106 Revenue 6,875 6,165 5,661 Noninterest expense 4,098 3,768 3,383 Pretax, pre-provision earnings (PPNR) (non-GAAP) 2,777 2,397 2,278 Provision for credit losses 191 210 254 Net income 2,055 1,772 1,643 Per Common Share Diluted earnings per share (EPS) $ 4.81 $ 4.13 $ 3.85 EPS impact of integration costs and 2Q26 significant items 0.04 0.19 — Diluted EPS - as adjusted (non-GAAP) 4.85 4.32 3.85 Average diluted common shares outstanding 403 405 397 Book value 145.52 143.65 131.61 Tangible book value (TBV) (non-GAAP) 111.09 109.42 103.96 Balance Sheet & Credit Quality Average loans In billions $ 363.2 $ 350.9 $ 322.8 Noninterest-bearing deposits In billions 103.5 99.1 93.1 Interest-bearing deposits In billions 353.5 359.3 329.8 Average deposits In billions 457.0 458.4 423.0 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI) In billions (4.1) (3.8) (4.7) Net loan charge-offs 226 253 198 Allowance for credit losses to total loans 1.48 % 1.52 % 1.62 % Selected Ratios Return on average common shareholders' equity 13.61 % 11.92 % 12.20 % Return on avg. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:36
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:22
26d ago
|
$BTU Investor Loss Alert: Peabody Investors may have been Misled after Mine Production Issues Lead to 10% Stock Drop – Contact BFA Law if You Lost Money | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, July 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Peabody Energy Corporation (NYSE:BTU) and certain of the Company’s senior executives for securities fraud after its significant stock drop resulting from potential violations of the federal securities laws.If you invested in Peabody, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit. Key Details of the Peabody ($BTU) Class Action: Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 24, 2026Alleged Misconduct: Securities fraud relating to Peabody’s statements about the coal production at Centurion, its flagship premium hard coking coal mine.Largest Alleged Stock Drop: March 30, 2026 – 9.7% stock dropCourt: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriAction: Contact BFA Law to discuss your rights Investors have until August 24, 2026 to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts securities fraud claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors in Peabody common stock. The class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. It is captioned McGeachy v. Peabody, et al., No. 26-cv-01020. Why is Peabody Being Sued for Securities Fraud? Peabody is a producer of metallurgic and thermal coal that owns interests in 16 active coal mining operations in the United States and Australia. According to the complaint, during the relevant period, Peabody announced it would be increasing production from its flagship premium hard coking coal mine, Centurion due to an acceleration of longwall operations. Peabody stated that shipments of Centurion’s premium hard coking coal would expand sevenfold in 2026 to 3.5 million tons and even more beyond that time. On February 5, 2026, Peabody indicated that the team was “putting the finishing touches on the Centurion mine in advance of starting longwall mining, well ahead of its original schedule.” As alleged, in truth, the Centurion mine was facing significant commissioning challenges resulting in increased costs and volume decreases in its production. Why did Peabody’s Stock Drop? On March 30, 2026, Peabody announced lower sales volume from the Centurion mine due to a delivery of only 250,000 tons in the first quarter. Peabody attributed the low volume to “greater than anticipated mine commissioning challenges.” This news caused the price of Peabody common stock to drop $3.82 per share, or 9.7%, from $39.50 per share on March 27, 2026, to $35.68 per share on March 30, 2026. Then, on May 5, 2026, Peabody announced additional delays to the commissioning of the Centurion mine as well as increased costs and lower volume. Peabody stated it only expected to sell about 300,000 tons in the second quarter and reduced its full year sales outlook for Centurion from 3.5 million tons to 2.5 million tons. This news caused the price of Peabody common stock to drop $1.52 per share, or 5.7%, from $26.52 per share on May 4, 2026, to $25.00 per share on May 5, 2025. Click here for more information: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit. What Can You Do? If you invested in Peabody, you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis; there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit Or contact: Adam McCall [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named “Elite Trial Lawyers” by the National Law Journal, “Litigation Stars” by Benchmark Litigation, among the top “500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers” by Lawdragon, “Titans of the Plaintiffs’ Bar” by Law360 and “SuperLawyers” by Thomson Reuters. Most recently, The Legal 500 awarded BFA the most client satisfaction accolades of any plaintiff’s securities litigation law firm, with clients noting: “[t]here is no better service provider in the practice area,” “[t]he interest of the client is always front and center,” and “[t]here isn’t a better firm in this space.” One testimonial described the firm as “nimble and entrepreneurial,” with a “relentless focus on adding value for clients.” Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.’s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit https://www.bfalaw.com. https://www.bfalaw.com/cases/peabody-class-action-lawsuit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-07-15 10:34
26d ago
Published
2026-07-15 06:13
26d ago
|
I Am Buying KLA Corporation Ahead Of Earnings | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
I rate KLA Corporation a Strong Buy with a $313 price target, implying 40% upside from $222. KLAC's 58% share in semiconductor process control gives it a dominant position in a part of semiconductor manufacturing that becomes more valuable as chips become harder to produce. My model estimates these drivers can increase revenue from about $14 billion in 2026 to roughly $18.3 billion by 2028 and lift split-adjusted EPS to about $5.3. |
|||