Original source text
FedEx Freight Hldg Co (NYSE:FDXF) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company's third-quarter earnings call has been provided below. Live financial news intelligence
Track market-moving stories before they get noisy
Real-time pulse of financial headlines curated from 5 premium feeds.
Latest market signal
English
Cryptocurrencies
BTC
11,155
ETH
7,159
XRP
5,619
SOL
4,605
HYPE
2,850
USDC
2,659
Commodities
GOLD
868
SILVER
439
OIL
125
PLATINUM
29
PALLADIUM
8
COPPER
5
- FMP Stock News 16s ago
- FMP Forex News 1m ago
- CoinGecko News 1m ago
- FIO Stock News 7m ago
- Patria Stock News 7m ago
- Editorial rewrite 16s ago
- Asset sync 33m ago
Latest coverage
Market News Feed
Scan headlines quickly, then expand any story for source context.
| Details | Date | Content | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:52
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:09
2d ago
|
FedEx Freight Hldg Co Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
|
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:52
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:46
2d ago
|
Why Cisco Systems (CSCO) Dipped More Than Broader Market Today | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Cisco Systems (CSCO - Free Report) closed at $108.59 in the latest trading session, marking a -1.54% move from the prior day. This change lagged the S&P 500's daily loss of 0.31%. Elsewhere, the Dow lost 0.25%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq lost 1.38%.Heading into today, shares of the seller of routers, switches, software and services had gained 2.47% over the past month, outpacing the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 3.14% and the S&P 500's gain of 0.87%. The investment community will be closely monitoring the performance of Cisco Systems in its forthcoming earnings report. On that day, Cisco Systems is projected to report earnings of $1.33 per share, which would represent year-over-year growth of 33%. In the meantime, our current consensus estimate forecasts the revenue to be $18.09 billion, indicating a 21.54% growth compared to the corresponding quarter of the prior year. For the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $5.11 per share and a revenue of $73.03 billion, representing changes of +18.01% and +15.33%, respectively, from the prior year. It is also important to note the recent changes to analyst estimates for Cisco Systems. Recent revisions tend to reflect the latest near-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To benefit from this, we have developed the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model which takes these estimate changes into account and provides an actionable rating system. Ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), the Zacks Rank system has a proven, outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks returning an average of +25% annually since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed a 0.05% increase. At present, Cisco Systems boasts a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). Looking at its valuation, Cisco Systems is holding a Forward P/E ratio of 21.57. This signifies a discount in comparison to the average Forward P/E of 23.13 for its industry. Investors should also note that CSCO has a PEG ratio of 1.98 right now. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. As of the close of trade yesterday, the Computer - Networking industry held an average PEG ratio of 1.45. The Computer - Networking industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 75, positioning it in the top 31% of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank evaluates the power of our distinct industry groups by determining the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks forming the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. To follow CSCO in the coming trading sessions, be sure to utilize Zacks.com. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:51
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:31
2d ago
|
Lost Money on Merck & Co., Inc. Shares? The Law Offices of Frank R. | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Merck & Co., Inc. ("Merck" or the "Company") investors who lost money may have claims to recover their losses. The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz today announced it is investigating potential securities fraud claims on behalf of investors in Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE: MRK), examining whether the Company may have violated the federal securities laws. The investigation centers on the disclosure about Merck & Co., Inc. on October 22, 2026. If you lost money on. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:51
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:11
2d ago
|
Oil Stocks in Spotlight Friday: Chevron, ExxonMobil, BP Could Show Impact of Higher Gas Prices | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Three of the largest oil companies are all set to report third-quarter financial results Friday before market open.Here’s a look at what analysts expect from the companies and what higher gas prices mean. Q3 Earnings EstimatesEstimates for the three oil companies are significantly higher than in the year-ago period for several metrics, according to data from Benzinga Pro. The three oil companies reporting Friday before market open are: BP Plc (NYSE:BP) Chevron Corporation (NYSE:CVX) ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (NYSE:XOM) Here are the current analyst estimates for the three companies. BP EPS: estimate $2.62 per share vs. 85 cents per share last year Revenue: $68.09 billion estimate vs. $48.42 billion last year The company has beaten analyst estimates for revenue in three straight quarters and in five of the last 10 quarters overall. ExxonMobil EPS: $4.08 estimate vs. $1.88 last year Revenue: $103.47 billion estimate vs. $85.29 billion last year The company has beaten analyst estimates for earnings per share in eight of the last 10 quarters, but missed second-quarter estimates. The company has beaten analyst estimates for revenue in six of the last 10 quarters, including three straight. Chevron EPS: $4.88 estimate vs. $1.85 last year Revenue: $61.11 billion estimate vs. $49.73 billion last year The company has beaten analyst estimates for earnings per share in seven of the last 10 quarters, including in five straight quarters. The company has beaten analyst estimates for revenue in seven of the last 10 quarters, including the most recent second quarter. Higher gas prices across the country have put oil stocks in the spotlight, as they could mean increased revenue and earnings for the companies. This may have been noticeable last quarter, when BP reported earnings of $2.22 per share, up from 90 cents a year earlier, along with its highest revenue quarter in years. Read Next For all three companies, earnings estimates are more than 100% higher than in last year’s third quarter, with revenue estimates also significantly higher. While oil prices may not be at record highs, they are significantly higher than in recent years, and heightened global demand is supporting better margins. President Donald Trump recently bragged that the higher gas prices are leading to record profits and he may have been talking about oil stocks. With consumers hurting at the pump, oil stocks could become the villain, even though most are just doing what they’ve always done, but now getting paid more for their output. Record Stock PricesHere are the current year-to-date stock gains for the three stocks: BP: +40.2% XOM: +49.0% CVX: +48.2% All three are significantly outperforming the 12.5% year-to-date gain for the S&P 500. Chevron and ExxonMobil head into the earnings report with shares trading within about 2% of all-time highs. BP stock trades at its highest level since 2014. Strong reports could push shares even higher, though higher estimates may already be baked into the price, unlike in recent quarters. Read Next Photo: Shutterstock Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:51
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:15
2d ago
|
Gap Inc. to Report Third Quarter Fiscal 2026 Results on November 19 | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Gap Inc. (NYSE: GAP) will report its third quarter fiscal 2026 financial results by press release on Thursday, November 19, 2026, at approximately 1:15 p.m. Pacific Time.In addition, the company will host a conference call to review its third quarter fiscal 2026 results on Thursday, November 19, 2026, beginning at approximately 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time. A live webcast of the conference call will be available online at investors.gapinc.com. A replay of the webcast will be available at the same location. About Gap Inc. Gap Inc., a purpose-driven house of iconic brands, is the largest specialty apparel company in America. Its Old Navy, Gap, Banana Republic, and Athleta brands offer clothing, accessories, and lifestyle products for men, women and children available worldwide through company-operated and franchise stores, and e-commerce sites. Through Encore, its cross-brand membership program, Gap Inc. has created products and experiences that shape culture, while doing right by employees, communities and the planet through its commitment to bridge gaps to create a better world. For more information, please visit www.gapinc.com. Investor Relations Contact: Whitney Notaro [email protected] Media Relations Contact: [email protected] SOURCE Gap Inc. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:50
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:46
2d ago
|
Synopsys (SNPS) Increases Despite Market Slip: Here's What You Need to Know | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Synopsys (SNPS - Free Report) closed the most recent trading day at $490.19, moving +1.72% from the previous trading session. The stock exceeded the S&P 500, which registered a loss of 0.31% for the day. On the other hand, the Dow registered a loss of 0.25%, and the technology-centric Nasdaq decreased by 1.38%.Shares of the maker of software used to test and develop chips have appreciated by 10.8% over the course of the past month, outperforming the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 3.14%, and the S&P 500's gain of 0.87%. The upcoming earnings release of Synopsys will be of great interest to investors. The company's upcoming EPS is projected at $4.12, signifying a 42.07% increase compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Meanwhile, the latest consensus estimate predicts the revenue to be $2.56 billion, indicating a 13.38% increase compared to the same quarter of the previous year. For the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates project earnings of $15.14 per share and a revenue of $9.72 billion, demonstrating changes of +17.27% and +37.77%, respectively, from the preceding year. Additionally, investors should keep an eye on any recent revisions to analyst forecasts for Synopsys. These revisions typically reflect the latest short-term business trends, which can change frequently. Consequently, upward revisions in estimates express analysts' positivity towards the business operations and its ability to generate profits. Empirical research indicates that these revisions in estimates have a direct correlation with impending stock price performance. To benefit from this, we have developed the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model which takes these estimate changes into account and provides an actionable rating system. The Zacks Rank system, which ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has witnessed a 0.29% increase. At present, Synopsys boasts a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy). Investors should also note Synopsys's current valuation metrics, including its Forward P/E ratio of 31.83. This valuation marks a premium compared to its industry average Forward P/E of 17.79. Investors should also note that SNPS has a PEG ratio of 1.42 right now. The PEG ratio bears resemblance to the frequently used P/E ratio, but this parameter also includes the company's expected earnings growth trajectory. Computer - Software stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 1.44 based on yesterday's closing prices. The Computer - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. This group has a Zacks Industry Rank of 57, putting it in the top 24% of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank is ordered from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. Be sure to use Zacks.com to monitor all these stock-influencing metrics, and more, throughout the forthcoming trading sessions. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:50
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:33
2d ago
|
GPRO Investors Have Opportunity to Join GoPro, Inc. Fraud Investigation with SBS Law | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $GPRO--GPRO Investors Have Opportunity to Join GoPro, Inc. Fraud Investigation with SBS Law. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:15
2d ago
|
CDS Visual Launches New Platform Enabling Collaboration Between Industrial Manufacturers and Partners | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- CDS Visual, part of Dover (NYSE: DOV), today announced the launch of CDS Partner Exchange™, an integrated platform that streamlines how industrial manufacturers and their business partners collaborate across critical commercial processes.CDS Partner Exchange connects CRM, ERP, commerce, and service systems to unify channel engagement, order processing, product visualization, quoting, service, and aftermarket support into a single environment. The platform enables a more connected, automated, and scalable partner ecosystem throughout the commercial lifecycle. "The future of partner engagement is not simply about providing access to information; it is creating a connected and automated network where manufacturers and their partners can collaborate in real time," said Anna Harkins, General Manager at CDS Visual. "CDS Partner Exchange brings together the systems, workflows, and insights that power critical commercial processes, helping manufacturers reduce manual effort, improve visibility, and deliver better business outcomes for partners." Key features of CDS Partner Exchange include: Self-Service Access: Provides partners, distributors, dealers, and customers with 24/7 access to view orders, alerts, and quotes through a single interface, lowering service costs while improving the user experience.Flexible Deployment Options: Offers a multi-tenant SaaS solution that can be configured as a stand-alone partner portal or integrated with existing ERP and e-commerce systems to unify product, parts, and service sales. Unified Partner Onboarding and Lifecycle Workflows: Streamlines onboarding, access provisioning, and ongoing partner management with configurable workflows.Advanced CRM-Integrated Partner Processes: Extends beyond standard CRM connectivity with workflow-driven integration, enabling seamless coordination between internal teams and partners.Deep ERP and Back-Office Integration: Natively connects partner interactions to ERP systems, eliminating transaction friction through real-time visibility into orders, inventory, pricing, and operational data.Embedded E-Commerce Experience Enhancing Workflows: Enables partners to browse products, manage favorites, and transact directly within the portal, bridging the gap between enablement and revenue execution.RFQ (Request for Quote) Workflow Orchestration: Supports structured quotation processes, accelerating deal cycles and improving pricing accuracy.Warranty and Returns Management: Simplifies the submission of warranty claims and returns with guided workflows and real-time status tracking.Content and Engagement Analytics: Provides visibility into partner activity and engagement, linking content usage and behavior to intent and outcomes.Visit cdsvisual.com to learn more about CDS Partner Exchange. About CDS Visual: CDS Visual, a Dover company, is a cloud-based provider of visualization, commerce, and workflow automation solutions trusted by some of the world's leading industrial manufacturers. Its visual-first engineering and commercial experience platform transforms complex engineering and product data into connected, interactive digital experiences. Since 2005, CDS Visual has helped manufacturers empower customers, partners, sales teams, and service organizations to confidently explore and configure products, identify the right spare parts, follow digital work instructions, and complete transactions faster. Together, these capabilities help manufacturers grow revenue, improve productivity, reduce support costs, and make it easier to do business. Visit us at www.cdsvisual.com and follow us on LinkedIn for more information. About Dover: Dover is a diversified global manufacturer and solutions provider with annual revenue of over $8 billion. We deliver innovative equipment and components, consumable supplies, aftermarket parts, software and digital solutions, and support services through five operating segments: Engineered Products, Clean Energy & Fueling, Imaging & Identification, Pumps & Process Solutions and Climate & Sustainability Technologies. Dover combines global scale with operational agility to lead the markets we serve. Recognized for our entrepreneurial approach for over 70 years, our team of approximately 24,000 employees takes an ownership mindset, collaborating with customers to redefine what's possible. Headquartered in Downers Grove, Illinois, Dover trades on the New York Stock Exchange under "DOV." Additional information is available at dovercorporation.com. CDS Visual Contact: Cara Panaccio (408) 550-8820 [email protected] Dover Media Contact: Adrian Sakowicz, VP, Communications (630) 743-5039 [email protected] Dover Investor Contact: Jack Dickens, VP, Investor Relations (630) 743-2566 [email protected] SOURCE Dover |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:39
2d ago
|
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited ( AEM ) Q3 2026 Earnings Call October 29, 2026 11:00 AM EDT Company Participants Ammar Al-Joundi - CEO, President & Director James Porter - Executive VP of Finance & CFO Dominique Girard - Executive VP and COO of Nunavut, Quebec & Europe Natasha Nella Vaz - Executive VP and COO of Ontario, Australia & Mexico Guy Gosselin - Executive Vice President of Exploration Conference Call Participants Fahad Tariq - Jefferies LLC, Research Division Richard Garchitorena - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division Bennett Moore - JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division Lawson Winder - BofA Securities, Research Division Matthew Murphy - BMO Capital Markets Equity Research John Tumazos - John Tumazos Very Independent Research, LLC Tanya Jakusconek - Scotiabank Global Banking and Markets, Research Division Anita Soni - CIBC Capital Markets, Research Division Presentation Operator Good morning. My name is Julie, and I will be your conference operator today. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:46
2d ago
|
BAIDU DEADLINE: ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Baidu, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - BIDU | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 29, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Baidu, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIDU) between November 18, 2025 and August 17, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important November 13, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.SO WHAT: If you purchased Baidu securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Baidu class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/baidu-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 13, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Baidu had overstated the ability of its AI business to mitigate rapid declines in its legacy online marketing business; (2) as a result, Baidu's revenue was reasonably likely to decline; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about Baidu's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Baidu class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/baidu-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/321711 Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs. Contact Us |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:48
2d ago
|
BAIDU DEADLINE: ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Baidu, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - BIDU | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
NEW YORK, Oct. 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Baidu, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIDU) between November 18, 2025 and August 17, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important November 13, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Baidu securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Baidu class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/baidu-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 13, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs’ Bar. Many of the firm’s attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Baidu had overstated the ability of its AI business to mitigate rapid declines in its legacy online marketing business; (2) as a result, Baidu’s revenue was reasonably likely to decline; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about Baidu’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Baidu class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/baidu-inc-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor’s ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] www.rosenlegal.com |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:34
2d ago
|
BIDU SHAREHOLDER ACTION REMINDER: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Baidu (BIDU) Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on November 13, 2026 | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Baidu To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in Baidu between November 18, 2025 and August 17, 2026 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 29, 2026) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Baidu, Inc. ("Baidu" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BIDU) and reminds investors of the November 13, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:35
2d ago
|
Kaplan Fox Reminds Investors of the November 13, 2026 Deadline in the Securities Class Action Against Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - October 29, 2026) - Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Baidu, Inc. ("Baidu" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: BIDU) on behalf of investors that purchased or otherwise acquired Baidu securities, including call options, between November 18, 2025 and August 17, 2026 (the "Class Period").CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE CASE If you are an investor in Baidu and have suffered losses, you may CLICK HERE to contact us. You may also contact Kaplan Fox by emailing [email protected] or by calling (646) 315-9003. DEADLINE REMINDER: If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the court no later than November 13, 2026 for an opportunity to be lead plaintiff for the purported class. If you have losses we encourage you to contact us to learn more about the lead plaintiff process. You need not seek to become a lead plaintiff in order to share in any possible recovery. According to the complaint, Baidu, the most popular internet search engine in China, made false and misleading statements to the market overstating the ability of its AI business to mitigate rapid declines in its legacy online marketing business and that the Company was likely to suffer a decline in revenue. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were allegedly materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period. According to the complaint, on February 26, 2026, Baidu American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") fell $7.50 per share, or 5.65%, after the Company reported fourth quarter and full year 2025 results revealing year-over-year revenue declines. Then, on August 18, 2026, Baidu ADSs fell $13.25 per share, or 12.73%, after the Company reported second quarter 2026 results revealing decelerating AI-powered business growth and steep legacy revenue declines. CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE WHY CONTACT KAPLAN FOX? Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP is a nationally recognized law firm focused on complex litigation, with offices in New York, Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New Jersey. Founded in 1956, the firm has spent more than 50 years prosecuting securities, antitrust, and consumer protection actions in federal and state courts nationwide, recovering more than $10 billion for clients and the classes it has represented. Kaplan Fox is widely regarded as one of the nation's premier plaintiffs' securities litigation firms and has received recognition from Chambers and Partners, Benchmark Litigation, Super Lawyers, and Lawdragon. Serving as lead or co-lead counsel in many landmark cases, the firm has secured some of the largest recoveries in the history of securities litigation, including a $2.425 billion recovery on behalf of Bank of America shareholders in In re Bank of America—the largest recovery ever obtained for claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act—$800 million recovered for the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and other pension funds in ATRS v. Allianz Global Investors, and a $475 million settlement in In re Merrill Lynch. For decades, Kaplan Fox has represented public pension funds, institutional investors, businesses, and individuals in high-stakes litigation. Through its successful advocacy and precedent-setting victories, the firm has helped shape important areas of securities and corporate law while advancing accountability and protecting investor interests. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. If you have any questions about this Notice, your rights, or your interests, please contact: Contacting or submitting information to Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor an obligation on the part of Kaplan Fox to retain you as a client. https://www.kaplanfox.com/case/baidu-inc-nadsaq-bidu-class-action-lawsuit-learn-more-now/ To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/320983 Source: Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs. Contact Us |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:49
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:46
2d ago
|
Baidu Inc. (BIDU) Sees a More Significant Dip Than Broader Market: Some Facts to Know | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
In the latest close session, Baidu Inc. (BIDU - Free Report) was down 1.08% at $78.64. The stock's performance was behind the S&P 500's daily loss of 0.31%. At the same time, the Dow lost 0.25%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq lost 1.38%.Shares of the web search company have depreciated by 8.48% over the course of the past month, underperforming the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 3.14%, and the S&P 500's gain of 0.87%. The upcoming earnings release of Baidu Inc. will be of great interest to investors. The company's earnings report is expected on November 16, 2026. The company is forecasted to report an EPS of $0.85, showcasing a 45.51% downward movement from the corresponding quarter of the prior year. Meanwhile, the latest consensus estimate predicts the revenue to be $4.61 billion, indicating a 5.18% increase compared to the same quarter of the previous year. BIDU's full-year Zacks Consensus Estimates are calling for earnings of $4.85 per share and revenue of $18.97 billion. These results would represent year-over-year changes of -36.52% and +4.81%, respectively. Investors should also take note of any recent adjustments to analyst estimates for Baidu Inc. These recent revisions tend to reflect the evolving nature of short-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability. Our research demonstrates that these adjustments in estimates directly associate with imminent stock price performance. To utilize this, we have created the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model that integrates these estimate changes and provides a functional rating system. The Zacks Rank system ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell). It has a remarkable, outside-audited track record of success, with #1 stocks delivering an average annual return of +25% since 1988. The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 15.95% lower within the past month. Baidu Inc. is holding a Zacks Rank of #5 (Strong Sell) right now. Investors should also note Baidu Inc.'s current valuation metrics, including its Forward P/E ratio of 16.4. This denotes a premium relative to the industry average Forward P/E of 14.82. It's also important to note that BIDU currently trades at a PEG ratio of 3.13. The PEG ratio bears resemblance to the frequently used P/E ratio, but this parameter also includes the company's expected earnings growth trajectory. The Internet - Services was holding an average PEG ratio of 0.94 at yesterday's closing price. The Internet - Services industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. This industry, currently bearing a Zacks Industry Rank of 174, finds itself in the bottom 30% echelons of all 250+ industries. The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. To follow BIDU in the coming trading sessions, be sure to utilize Zacks.com. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:48
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:15
2d ago
|
Stanley Black & Decker Announces 4th Quarter 2026 Dividend | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE: SWK), a global leader in tools and outdoor solutions, announced today that its Board of Directors approved a regular fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.84 per common share. The dividend is payable on Tuesday, December 22, 2026, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on Tuesday, December 1, 2026.About Stanley Black & Decker Founded in 1843 and headquartered in the USA, Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE: SWK) is a worldwide leader in Tools and Outdoor, operating manufacturing facilities globally. The Company's approximately 41,000 employees produce innovative end-user inspired power tools, hand tools, storage, digital jobsite solutions, outdoor and lifestyle products, and engineered fasteners to support the world's builders, tradespeople and DIYers. The Company's world class portfolio of trusted brands includes DEWALT®, CRAFTSMAN®, STANLEY®, BLACK+DECKER®, and Cub Cadet®. To learn more visit: www.stanleyblackanddecker.com or follow Stanley Black & Decker on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and X. Stanley Black & Decker Investor Contacts Michael Wherley Vice President, Investor Relations [email protected] (860) 827-3833 Christina Francis Senior Director, Investor Relations [email protected] (860) 438-3470 SOURCE Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:48
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:46
2d ago
|
Oracle (ORCL) Sees a More Significant Dip Than Broader Market: Some Facts to Know | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Oracle (ORCL - Free Report) ended the recent trading session at $139.56, demonstrating a -3.45% change from the preceding day's closing price. The stock's change was less than the S&P 500's daily loss of 0.31%. Meanwhile, the Dow experienced a drop of 0.25%, and the technology-dominated Nasdaq saw a decrease of 1.38%.Coming into today, shares of the software maker had gained 5.27% in the past month. In that same time, the Computer and Technology sector lost 3.14%, while the S&P 500 gained 0.87%. Investors will be eagerly watching for the performance of Oracle in its upcoming earnings disclosure. The company is expected to report EPS of $1.88, down 16.81% from the prior-year quarter. Alongside, our most recent consensus estimate is anticipating revenue of $21.31 billion, indicating a 32.68% upward movement from the same quarter last year. For the annual period, the Zacks Consensus Estimates anticipate earnings of $8.13 per share and a revenue of $90.5 billion, signifying shifts of +6.55% and +34.36%, respectively, from the last year. Any recent changes to analyst estimates for Oracle should also be noted by investors. These revisions typically reflect the latest short-term business trends, which can change frequently. As such, positive estimate revisions reflect analyst optimism about the business and profitability. Our research suggests that these changes in estimates have a direct relationship with upcoming stock price performance. To utilize this, we have created the Zacks Rank, a proprietary model that integrates these estimate changes and provides a functional rating system. Ranging from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), the Zacks Rank system has a proven, outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks returning an average of +25% annually since 1988. Over the last 30 days, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 0.21% higher. Oracle presently features a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy). Digging into valuation, Oracle currently has a Forward P/E ratio of 17.79. This valuation marks no noticeable deviation compared to its industry average Forward P/E of 17.79. Also, we should mention that ORCL has a PEG ratio of 0.84. The PEG ratio is similar to the widely-used P/E ratio, but this metric also takes the company's expected earnings growth rate into account. Computer - Software stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 1.44 based on yesterday's closing prices. The Computer - Software industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. At present, this industry carries a Zacks Industry Rank of 57, placing it within the top 24% of over 250 industries. The Zacks Industry Rank assesses the strength of our separate industry groups by calculating the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks contained within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1. To follow ORCL in the coming trading sessions, be sure to utilize Zacks.com. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:47
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:15
2d ago
|
Digital Realty Trust Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Digital Realty Trust (NYSE:DLR) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.Benzinga APIs provide real-time access to earnings call transcripts and financial data. Visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ to learn more. View the webcast at https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/y4iy6tn9/ SummaryDigital Realty Trust reported an exceptionally strong third quarter, with a 11% growth in core FFO per share, surpassing expectations and prompting a nearly 2% increase in full-year guidance. The company achieved record leasing activity of $855 million, significantly boosting its backlog to a new record of $2.5 billion, providing strong visibility through 2028. Strategic private capital initiatives progressed with over $1.4 billion in equity commitments for a new perpetual capital strategy focused on hyperscale data centers in North America. Operational highlights included a 16% year-to-date increase in recurring revenue, a dramatic acceleration in colocation and interconnection leasing, and continued expansion in global markets, including new entries into Turkey. Management emphasized the importance of connectivity and AI-ready infrastructure, highlighting strong demand across all segments and regions, as well as a robust development pipeline of 1.5 gigawatts. Digital Realty Trust maintained a strong balance sheet, raising approximately $3.5 billion recently, and noted Moody’s upgrade to Baa1, reflecting financial strength and strategic capital access. Full TranscriptOPERATOR Good afternoon and welcome to Digital Realty Trust third quarter 2026 earnings call. Please note this event is being recorded. During today’s presentation, all parties will be in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Callers will be limited to one question and we will aim to conclude at the top of the hour. I would now like to turn the call over to Jordan Sadler, Digital Realty Trust Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Jordan Sadler (Senior Vice President, Investor Relations) Thank you, operator, and welcome everyone to Digital Realty Trust’s third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Joining me on today’s call are President and CEO Andy Power and CFO Matt Mercier. Chief Investment Officer Greg Wright, Chief Technology Officer Chris Sharp, and Chief Revenue Officer Colin McLean are also on the call and will be available for Q&A. Management will be making forward-looking statements, including guidance and underlying assumptions, on today’s call. Forward-looking statements are based on expectations that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to materially differ. For a further discussion of risks related to our business, see our 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. This call will contain certain non-GAAP financial information; reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the supplemental package furnished to the SEC and available on our website. Before I turn the call over to Andy, let me offer a few key takeaways from our third quarter results. First, exceptionally strong execution across our global platform drove upside to revenues, adjusted EBITDA, and core FFO. 11% core FFO per share growth exceeded our expectations, and we are raising our full-year guidance range by almost 2%, now anticipating nearly 13% bottom-line growth. Second, total leasing for the quarter was a blowout at $855 million, or $627 million at our share, with new records set across several metrics. Signings in the 0 to 1 megawatt plus interconnection category exceeded last quarter’s record by 40%. Total greater-than-a-megawatt leasing reached $689 million, or $474 million at our share, driven by a new high watermark in pricing. Third, these bookings pushed our total backlog to a new record of $2.5 billion, or $1.8 billion at Digital Realty Trust share, which provides us with strong visibility through next year and into 2028, bolstering our confidence in our multi-year double-digit growth expectations. And lastly, we achieved another important milestone within our Strategic Private Capital Initiative in the last week, closing over $1.4 billion of initial cornerstone equity commitments to our new perpetual capital strategy focused on stabilized hyperscale data centers in North America. This capital will further fuel our efforts to support our customers’ fast-growing requirements for digital infrastructure. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to our President and CEO, Andy Power. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Jordan, and thanks to everyone for joining our call. Digital Realty Trust delivered an outstanding quarter highlighted by strong execution across our global platform, robust financial results, record leasing activity, and continued progress against our long-term growth strategy. The digital infrastructure industry continues to evolve rapidly. The adoption of artificial intelligence is driving unprecedented demand for capacity while simultaneously increasing the value of highly connected environments, strategic locations, and global reach. As enterprises, cloud providers, network operators, and AI innovators continue to expand their digital infrastructure footprints, they increasingly require the partners that can provide capacity and connectivity together with the capital, expertise, and operational capabilities necessary to execute at scale. Uniquely, our global platform spans six continents, bringing together colocation and connectivity hubs, hyperscale data centers, and strategic private capital capabilities. Over the past several years we have deliberately strengthened these three core growth pillars to better serve our growing customer base. Together they create a differentiated platform that combines global scale, connectivity-rich environments, development expertise, and capital flexibility together with a 20-plus-year track record that is increasingly important as development, power procurement, community engagement, and operations become more complex. This combination distinguishes Digital Realty Trust in a market where reliable execution, speed to market, and connectivity have become just as important as capacity itself. The third quarter’s record leasing activity demonstrated the power of this differentiated global platform and the value proposition it delivers to customers around the world. We achieved record total bookings of approximately $855 million, or $627 million at Digital Realty Trust share, driven by record performance in each of our leasing categories. Importantly, demand was broad-based across geographies, customer segments, and deployment types, demonstrating the growing appeal of PlatformDIGITAL. We continue to see the benefits of artificial intelligence extending well beyond large-scale training deployments and into enterprise adoption, inference workloads, connectivity-rich environments, and new geographies. We believe this broadening demand profile further strengthens Digital Realty Trust’s competitive position and long-term growth outlook. Pricing was strong throughout the quarter, particularly within our greater-than-1-megawatt category, reflecting robust and sustained demand and growing constraints around the development of new capacity. These results add to our already substantial backlog and provide additional visibility into our growth over the next several years. The strength of our results this quarter reflects contributions from each of our three core growth pillars, starting with colocation and connectivity. Connectivity is becoming increasingly important as digital infrastructure architectures grow more distributed and data-intensive. Today, that trend is being accelerated by AI, cloud adoption, and the increasing need to move, access, and exchange data across multiple environments. While AI is often discussed in terms of large-scale compute deployments, the reality is that AI workloads increasingly depend on a broader digital infrastructure architecture that connects compute and storage with cloud platforms, networks, customers, and inference locations. As AI deployments become more distributed, connectivity becomes increasingly important to performance, user experience, and scalability. AI agent encoding workloads make many round trips per task. Placing capacity close to end users and cloud zones improves performance and supports in-region data handling. Today’s AI infrastructure buildout is driving demand for our connected environments in strategic locations around the world. Digital Realty Trust’s growing global footprint of connectivity-rich environments and growing roster of more than 6,000 customers position us to help customers deploy increasingly distributed enterprise, cloud, and AI architectures. These trends were clearly reflected in our results during the quarter. Bookings within our 0 to 1 megawatt plus interconnection category exceeded $150 million at Digital Realty Trust share, increasing 80% year over year and 40% from the second quarter, marking our fourth consecutive quarterly record in this category. Matt will provide additional details in a few moments. These results reinforce our conviction that colocation and connectivity will continue to be a critical driver of long-term growth. Turning to our second growth pillar, hyperscale data centers, demand for large-scale deployments was exceptionally strong during the quarter, reflecting the continued expansion of cloud platforms, AI infrastructure, and larger enterprise deployments. While AI is driving unprecedented levels of demand, delivering that capacity has become increasingly challenging. Customers today increasingly recognize the value of experienced partners with the technological and engineering capabilities, development expertise, and financial position required to deliver and operate critical infrastructure at scale. Our leasing results during the quarter clearly reflected these dynamics. Total hyperscale bookings of $689 million, or $474 million at Digital Realty Trust share, set another quarterly record. Hyperscale demand was broad-based across our footprint, further demonstrating customers’ expanding needs for capacity beyond the U.S. In addition to two sizable hyperscale leases signed in early July in Northern Virginia, leasing was strong in APAC and exceeded our prior regional record by more than 600%. When combined with the record pricing achieved in this category and our growing backlog of contracted leases, these results provide increased visibility into our future growth. Turning to our third growth pillar, strategic private capital, unprecedented demand for digital infrastructure and the extraordinary scaling of AI have clearly driven a corresponding increase in capital requirements across our industry. As infrastructure deployments grow larger, more complex, and more capital intensive, access to capital is becoming an increasingly important competitive differentiator. While newer entrants to the hyperscale data center field have emerged, most lack the scale, balance sheet strength, or funding sources necessary to pursue opportunities at the scale required by hyperscale customers today. In this sense, Digital Realty Trust has spent the last two decades positioning for the current opportunity. We received our first investment grade ratings in 2009, completed our first private capital venture in 2013, and have spent the last four years scaling our strategic private capital franchise to support the massive growth in hyperscaler demand that appeared on the horizon. Further accelerating these efforts, in the third quarter we closed on the acquisition of Columbia Capital, a 30-plus-year digital infrastructure-focused investment platform. Columbia’s experienced investment team and established portfolio complement Digital Realty Trust’s global platform and strengthen investment capabilities to take advantage of the expanding AI infrastructure ecosystem. Today, our strategic private capital platform provides additional sources of capital, enhances our investment flexibility and financing options, and enables us to pursue a broader set of opportunities, all while accelerating Digital Realty Trust’s core FFO growth and maintaining its balance sheet strength. Subsequent to quarter end, we successfully completed our initial cornerstone closing on a new strategy focused on stabilized hyperscale data centers in North America, and we welcome these partners to Platform Digital. Thank you for your partnership. We expect our strategic private capital platform to play an important role in the perpetual capitalization of hyperscale data centers and to drive long-term value creation for both our private institutional partners and Digital Realty Trust shareholders. During the third quarter, we continued to see enterprises and hyperscalers expand across Platform Digital as AI inference continues to emerge around the world. A few examples include: a major AI platform is leveraging Platform Digital’s robust interconnection capabilities and global footprint by deploying inference and low-latency edge hubs in 15 different metros to enhance their ability to serve their customers’ needs. A global medical device and services provider is deploying distributed AI data hubs in four locations across our three global regions to enable faster capture and analytics. A global financial services company chose to deploy on Platform Digital in three major financial centers around the world to meet low-latency requirements and support increasing demand from a growing customer base. And a leading global auto manufacturer is expanding on Platform Digital to support their immediate growth needs for computing infrastructure while leveraging robust network and cloud connectivity to meet growing demand. Together these wins show the value of a single platform that can serve customers wherever demand takes them, from large-scale AI capacity to low-latency edge, and that breadth is what converts today’s demand into durable long-term growth. Before turning the call over to Matt, I’d like to address the increased public attention our industry is receiving and how Digital Realty Trust approaches its responsibility as a member of the communities where we operate. The concerns we hear from communities, elected officials, and regulators are understandable, and we welcome these conversations. The scale of the data center buildout is historic, and it is only natural that people want to know how data centers affect their utility bills, water resources, air quality, noise, and the overall fabric of their communities. And they want to understand the benefits created by a data center project in their city or town. At Digital Realty Trust, we believe those are the right questions to ask, and we are at the table answering them openly and with transparency. We believe stakeholders should expect responsible development, the highest level of resource stewardship, job opportunities, and a committed partner in return for welcoming us into their community. Our perspective is informed by more than 20 years of developing and operating data centers around the world. During that time, we have learned that successful projects are built on transparency, partnership, and a commitment to creating tangible community benefits alongside long-term shareholder value. That experience also led us, together with other like-minded providers, to launch Infrastructure for America, recognizing that our industry needs to do a better job of engaging transparently with communities, listening to their concerns, and sharing the facts about both the impacts and benefits of digital infrastructure. One of the most common concerns involves energy consumption and electric grid capacity. It is undisputed that data centers require significant power, which is why we work closely with utilities, regulators, and local stakeholders long before construction begins. We have also signed the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, reflecting our commitment that the cost of infrastructure required to serve new data center demand should not be borne by residential customers and small businesses. We also procure renewable energy to support our operations and continue to invest in solutions that improve efficiency and support grid reliability. Last year, 93% of our global electricity consumption was covered by clean energy. For 25 years, the grid in America has been starved of investment. Today, due to demand for digital products and services, billions of dollars are being invested in the grid across the nation. Everyone will benefit from these infrastructure investments in the form of a stronger and more resilient grid. We can support grid reliability during peak demand events by relying on on-site backup generation, reducing our demand on the grid, thereby helping preserve capacity for other users. Water usage is another area of focus. Approximately 75% of our data centers utilize highly efficient closed-loop cooling systems or do not use water for cooling. Closed-loop systems are designed to limit the amount of water consumed to cool data centers. As technology continues to evolve, we remain committed to responsible water stewardship and ongoing efficiency improvements across our portfolio. We also believe the economic benefits of data centers should be tangible and local. Data centers generate substantial recurring property tax revenue while requiring relatively limited ongoing demand for public services. Those revenues support schools, transportation infrastructure, public safety, and other community priorities, and these benefits help build and sustain communities for decades. We have seen this firsthand in Loudoun County, Virginia, home to Data Center Alley, the largest concentration of data centers in the world. While many factors contribute to its success, decades of digital infrastructure investment have played an important role in supporting the county’s economic strength and tax base. Today, Loudoun County has the highest median household income in the United States and consistently ranks among the nation’s leading communities for schools, quality of life, and economic opportunity. Today, at Fort Gillem, near Atlanta, Digital Realty Trust is helping transform and remediate a former military installation, returning long-unused land to productive use as a major center for technology investment, employment, and economic activity. Similarly, in DeSoto, Kansas, outside of Kansas City, we’ve engaged with community stakeholders to ensure our development plans for the former Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant site align with local priorities and contribute to the community’s long-term vision for growth, while supporting new infrastructure investment, job creation, and economic development opportunities. We’re also working to address misconceptions surrounding our industry. Over the last year, we have opened our doors around the world to provide data center tours to policymakers, students, community groups, and the media so they can see firsthand our world-class operations and commitment to transparency. We believe this approach will help separate fact from fiction surrounding data centers. In our view, informed dialogue leads to better decisions and better outcomes. We remain committed to earning the trust of the communities where we operate through transparency, responsible resource stewardship, and measurable local investment. Our annual impact report provides transparency into those efforts and helps hold us accountable for the commitments we make. And with that, I’ll now turn the call over to our CFO, Matt Mercier. Matt Mercier (Chief Financial Officer) Thank you, Andy. Digital Realty Trust delivered better-than-expected results across the board in the third quarter, with a dramatic acceleration in colocation and interconnection leasing and a new record in overall leasing that exceeded the prior record by 20%, which drove an almost 30% sequential increase in our backlog. We achieved these results while continuing to invest with conviction in future growth, further expanding our development and investment platform, advancing our private capital initiatives, and maintaining pro forma leverage below five times at quarter end, comfortably below our long-term target. Turning to our operating performance, we continue to see strong momentum across our global platform supported by healthy customer demand, improving occupancy, favorable renewal spreads, and increasing contributions from new leasing commencements. Starting with our same-capital portfolio, cash NOI increased approximately 6% year over year in the third quarter, bringing year-to-date constant currency growth to approximately 5%. The underlying fundamentals remain very strong. Stabilized occupancy increased nearly 90 basis points sequentially to 93.4%, churn reached a record low of just 0.7%, and cash re-leasing spreads approached 12%, our third-highest quarterly result on record. We also saw notable strength in our 0 to 1 megawatt business, which together with strong retention and favorable pricing is helping drive occupancy gains and organic growth across our existing portfolio. And importantly, that strength extends well beyond our stabilized portfolio. Across our broader global platform, recurring revenue increased nearly 16% year to date, or more than 14% on a constant currency basis, with double-digit reported growth across all three regions. Taken together, these results highlight the strength and diversity of our global platform with multiple drivers of organic growth, an expanding portfolio, and a substantial backlog of contracted future revenue supporting our confidence in continued bottom-line growth. Turning to leasing activity, bookings across our platform were robust, highlighted by another record quarter in our 0 to 1 megawatt plus interconnection business and increasingly global demand for hyperscale capacity. In the 0 to 1 megawatt plus interconnection category, we generated a record 165 million of total bookings, or 151.8 million at Digital Realty Trust share during the quarter, representing a 40% increase over last quarter’s record. This segment saw new records across all three regions, demonstrating the importance of highly connected infrastructure around the world. This quarter the 500 kilowatt to 1 megawatt sub-segment was particularly strong, driven by large enterprise and service provider deployments. We also saw a large network architecture deployment by one of the leading AI labs across 15 of our sites in EMEA. The sites serve as interconnection hubs, giving the customer direct private connectivity to cloud providers, network carriers, and enterprise customers within each region. We expect to see similar space and power deployments across our portfolio as AI inference use cases continue to emerge, with two drivers gaining momentum: agentic AI, where general purpose agents are rolling out and massive user uptake is just beginning to unfold, and sovereign AI, where governments and regulated enterprises need in-region capacity and connectivity to keep models and data within their borders. Interconnection bookings totaled a record 23.9 million, or 22.2 million at Digital Realty Trust share, exceeding the previous quarterly record by approximately 8%. Importantly, AI inference-related deployments spanned more than 15 separate markets during the quarter, further demonstrating that AI adoption is accelerating beyond large training deployments and into a broader set of enterprise- and inference-oriented use cases. We also marked a new record in the greater-than-a-megawatt category during the quarter, as strong global demand drove 689 million of total bookings, or 474 million at Digital Realty Trust share. Activity in this segment was driven by the two previously disclosed hyperscale leases in Northern Virginia, as well as record signings in APAC with large leases in Seoul, Chennai, and Sifi. Renewal activity turned out strong once again in the third quarter as well. We signed another 261 million of renewals at a blended average 11.8% cash re-leasing spread, reflecting the value that our customers realize in our facilities, the tight availability in our markets, and our ability to capture pricing as contracts roll. Year to date, cash renewal spreads are up over 14%. Combined with limited churn and record new leasing activity, these results continue to demonstrate the favorable supply-demand dynamics across our key markets and support another increase to our full-year guidance. Renewals in the 0 to 1 megawatt category accounted for 61% of total renewals and contributed a 4.7% cash mark-to-market. Greater-than-a-megawatt renewals accounted for 36% of the total and delivered a robust 26.3% mark-to-market, led by multiple hyperscale renewals in Northern Virginia. We commenced 207 million of annualized GAAP rent in the third quarter, consistent with the prior three quarters, providing a steady stream of new rental revenue over the past year. Commencements are expected to accelerate over the next two quarters given an uplift from newly signed 0 to 1 megawatt leases and over 250 megawatts of upcoming pre-lease deliveries. These commencements will continue to drive revenue growth, further supporting the multiyear earnings growth forecast we provided last quarter. Combining strong leasing activity with minimal churn and steady commencements, our backlog reached a new record of 2.5 billion at quarter end, or 1.8 billion at Digital Realty Trust share. Our booked-not-billed backlog now represents almost 40% of in-place rental revenue. As for earnings, we reported core FFO of $2.10 per share for the third quarter, an 11% increase year over year. This quarter’s results reflect strong commencements over the past several quarters, the uplift from the growing mark-to-market opportunity, and growing fee income. The third quarter also included a full quarter’s impact from the acquisition of a development partner’s interest in three assets that closed at the very end of last quarter, and nearly a half-quarter contribution from Columbia Capital. With continued operational momentum and our record backlog, we remain confident in our outlook for the remainder of 2026 and 2027. Turning to investment activity, we continued to deploy capital in support of the significant demand that we see across our platform. During the third quarter, we invested $1.5 billion in development capex, bringing year-to-date capital spending to 3.3 billion net of our partner share. We continue to acquire sites for future organic development, investing over 700 million across seven different locations in the U.S. and Europe. These investments include expansion capacity for both colocation and hyperscale, including a 1 gigawatt development in the greater Indianapolis metro area. We also expanded our footprint into Turkey, our 65th global metro, through a development joint venture with one of Turkey’s largest infrastructure, development, and investment conglomerates. The first project is for 22 megawatts of IT capacity in Ankara with meaningful expansion potential. The JV will then focus on expansion into Istanbul. The addition of Turkey further extends our presence in Southern Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean, providing another avenue for future growth in this strategically important region. These activities reflect our continued focus on expanding the markets where we see strong customer demand, positioning the platform for future growth. During the quarter we delivered 50 megawatts of new IT capacity, which was 95% pre-leased. We also commenced development of 112 megawatts of capacity, including projects in five different countries in APAC along with other projects in EMEA and the Americas. As a result, our development pipeline expanded to 1.5 gigawatts under construction at a total expected cost of 22 billion, representing a 9% increase quarter over quarter. The development pipeline remains 63% pre-leased and at an 11.6% average expected stabilized yield. Turning to the balance sheet, our investment-grade balance sheet, seasoned public shareholder base, and growing strategic private capital initiative have developed into a broad, diversified funding model with access to capital that is unique among global data center providers. Over the last several weeks we accessed capital across the stack, raising approximately 3.5 billion, further scaling the quantum of capital available to support our customers’ digital infrastructure requirements. During the quarter we raised 450 million of common equity under the ATM, and in early October we raised 1.7 billion of total debt proceeds at a 4% blended average coupon from a 10-year euro bond and a multi-tranche Swiss franc bond with a weighted average term of nearly five and a half years. In the last week, we achieved another important milestone within our strategic private capital business, closing over 1.4 billion of initial cornerstone equity and commitments from a variety of institutional investors, pension funds, insurance companies, and consultants, advancing a new perpetual capital strategy focused on stabilized hyperscale data center in North America. The strategy leverages the institutional demand for digital infrastructure investments and significantly expands our access to long-term private capital. We view this access to a broad and diverse array of public and private capital sources as a strategic advantage that should continue to create opportunity for Digital Realty Trust. Reflecting the company’s balance sheet position and demonstrated access to capital, as well as the company’s strong operating performance, in September, Moody’s upgraded our long-term issuer rating to Baa1. At the end of the third quarter, Digital Realty Trust’s leverage edged up to 5.2 times on a headline basis, or 4.9 times pro forma for the upcoming stabilization of the three 100% leased Northern Virginia developments we acquired at the end of last quarter. We estimate that Digital Realty Trust maintains over 20 billion of capital available to support future development when combining our current liquidity and leverage capacity, as well as funding available through our private development venture, our closed-end fund, and our most recent perpetual capital strategy. I will conclude with guidance. We are raising our 2026 core FFO per share guidance, excluding net promote income, by $0.15, or nearly 2%, to a new range of $8.30 to $8.35 per share. The midpoint of the updated range represents almost 13% growth over 2025, which would mark our second consecutive year of double-digit core FFO per share growth. We also expect cash renewal spreads of 10% to 12%, up another 100 basis points from last quarter, driven by strong performance year to date; same-capital cash NOI growth of 5.25% to 5.75% on a constant currency basis, up 75 basis points at the midpoint; capex, net of partner contributions, remains consistent with our prior range at 4.25 to 4.75 billion; and we are raising our capital recycling guidance by another 500 million to a range of 1.5 to 2 billion to reflect the success of our new perpetual private capital strategy. Importantly, strong execution across the 0 to 1 megawatt category, a record backlog of contractual commencements, an expanding development pipeline, and recent strategic initiatives provide increased confidence in our ability to extend our double-digit core FFO per share growth trajectory into 2027 and beyond. This concludes our prepared remarks, and now we’ll be pleased to take your questions. Operator, would you please begin the Q&A session? OPERATOR Thank you so much. And for the interest of time and to allow a larger number of people to ask questions, callers will be limited to one question. And if you do have a question, press star 11 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To remove yourself, press star 11 again. One moment for our first question. That comes from John Peterson with Jefferies. Please proceed. John Peterson (Analyst) Great. Thank you. Congrats on the strong leasing and the strong quarter. I wanted to ask some questions around the land bank. So you refilled or you added quite a bit to your land bank buying in Indianapolis and Charlotte this quarter and you did a big acquisition in Kansas earlier this year. Can you just remind us how you think about which markets you want to go into and if you can give us maybe some more color on who’s selling this land? Did these people intend on building data centers themselves and decided they couldn’t do it or something else? Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, John. So I would call the playbook of where we’ve been growing, expanding our markets is consistent in terms of focusing on places where we see both robust and diverse customer demand. That’s in terms of workloads serving digital transformation for the enterprise, cloud computing, and AI. Kansas City is a great example where we see a market with numerous fiber optic routes, a market where the cloud hyperscalers have been landing and expanding with self-builds, and a place where we could call land and essentially create a runway for growth. Our expansion into Charlotte is also a similar example. We’d operated that market with a carrier connectivity location downtown, which we are expanding, but then expanded out by the airport with a larger footprint and had one of our largest leases in the history of the company at the beginning of this year supporting AI inference for a top, strong, investment-grade hyperscaler. I’ll let Greg touch on who are some of the sellers and what some of this land was before we’re going to turn it into data centers, which was also highlighted in our prepared remarks. Greg Wright (Chief Investment Officer) Yeah, thanks, Andy. Look, I think as Andy touched on, John, we’ve addressed in the past sort of our logic and strategic rationale for both Charlotte, Kansas City, and the like. But I think when you think about Indiana, it’s not dramatically different, right. It’s consistent with these other large new market entries. It’s strategically located land in markets where we believe there’s going to be multiple use cases, whether it’s cloud, AI, or digital transformation. But in the case of Indianapolis, you have a robust economy and significant corporate presence. It’s home to numerous Fortune 500 companies, including companies like Eli Lilly and Cummins. Advanced manufacturing is the cornerstone of that economy. It’s a $500 billion economy in that element alone, which makes up 25% of the state’s GDP, and it ranks first nationally in terms of manufacturing jobs per capita and really boasts a skilled trade workforce and supplier base. But, you know, that’s sort of the general characteristics. When you look, Indiana is quickly becoming a top Midwest hyperscale market. You have more than 70 data center facilities there now and it ranks sixth in the U.S. in terms of number of data centers. And if you look back over the last three years, they’ve attracted more than $25 billion of hyperscale investment from the likes of AWS, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and others. And then it’s also benefiting from the fact that you have these long queues and power constraints across Ohio, you have numerous moratoriums across Michigan, and, for example, you have Illinois’s BIPA legislation pushing hyperscalers out of that state. So as a result, Indiana, and outside of Indianapolis in particular, has become very well placed to capture these large deployments. And finally, back on Andy’s latency theme, if you will, you have strong latency—really what I would say is sitting at the crossroads of America. Indiana sits within a day’s drive of 80% of the U.S. population. And then you have long-haul fiber providers from groups like Zayo, Lumen, Great Plains, and Meta which deliver sub-10 millisecond latency to places like Chicago, Indianapolis, Columbus, and St. Louis. And then finally it’s really a low power cost. So you look at power rates of roughly $0.09 per kilowatt-hour, and it’s below—in some instances significantly below—most competing markets across the U.S. So that’s just to highlight a couple of the points. Just one other thing—you asked about who’s selling this land. I mean these are great stories where we worked with, call it, local real estate developers—specifically Kansas City, Atlanta—taking sites that were industrialized. Those two in particular were former Army use cases years and years ago, and really we were able to revitalize the community with a great investment that’s going to benefit the broader community there. OPERATOR Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Elias with TD Securities. Please proceed. Michael Elias (Analyst) Perfect. Thanks for taking the question. Andy, on the call I felt like you focused a lot on connectivity. As I consider the market landscape, we’re seeing edge and network nodes approaching, call it, 40 megawatts for some of the hyperscalers. You have edge AI inference nodes getting as large as 20 megawatts on a distributed basis in a bunch of different markets. And then you’re highlighting AI labs doing network nodes with you. As I consider the form factor of this against the broader landscape of data center developers, it does seem like you’re uniquely positioned to capture that opportunity. How do you think about the medium- to long-term opportunity on the edge inference side? And as part of that, what does that imply for the interconnection opportunity for Digital? Thank you. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Michael. I kind of boil down the value proposition to the enterprise or the connectivity service provider—unrelated to prior use cases or AI—into three buckets that we check all. One, global reach and scope. Now with our entry into Turkey, up to 65 global markets, we obviously have tremendous scale. Two, connectivity-rich environments. You can see that in terms of our cross-connects, which were a record, call it, 22 million, up 13% year over year, and that’s both physical and virtual cross-connects. And then three, a trend that I think is our friend at Digital Realty is, call it, AI-ready infrastructure. So we’ve got increasing footprints, increasing power densities, and greater needs for liquid cooling. I can tell you today we’re already operationalized—live—with liquid cooling for the AI use cases in north of 25 different locations, different customers. At least half of that is in the, call it, 500 kilowatt to 5 megawatt-sized blocks in addition to some of the larger footprints. And what we’ve called sold but not yet delivered in that backlog doubles those customer counts and locations and brings us close to a gigawatt of operational expertise in that category. Inside our zero to one megawatt bookings, lots of great records in there—four in a row, up 40% quarter over quarter, 80% year over year. If you kind of unpack the top signings just real quickly: number one was actually an enterprise signing, believe it or not—an enterprise signed with us outside the U.S.; number two was a traditional hyperscale signing; and number three and the next several were AI use cases, including what we highlighted in the prepared remarks was a 15-site basically backbone buildout for one of the major AI labs. So I think we are very well positioned, and this quarter really highlights that. OPERATOR Thank you. One moment for our next question that comes from Eric Lupchow with Wells Fargo. Please proceed. Eric Lupchow (Analyst) Great, thanks for taking the question. Maybe just touch on kind of the recent changes in cost of capital that we’ve seen across really the whole industry, and just wondering if you look at market rent growth today, do you think that’s rising faster than your implied cost of development? It looks like that averages around 15 million a megawatt across your global portfolio. And then maybe you could just touch on things you’re doing to try to mitigate development cost inflation, whether that comes from procuring long lead-time equipment, procuring labor supply, or anything else that Digital’s doing. Thank you. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Eric. So lots to unpack in there. I’m going to try to tag-team this and work it backwards with Matt for a second. You’ve obviously seen great strength in our rates across our segments, across our geographies—always a little bit mixed depending on what the quarter is—but definitely seeing great pricing increases. I look at it at a high level. Our development pipeline is, call it, up from 10 now to 22 billion, so a 100% increase or more since just the beginning of the year, and our net yields have really gone up, call it, over 11.5%. And our pre-leasing, our de-risking of that, has been maintained, call it, north of 63%. And if you net the colo—which is more of a, call it, closer delivery sign-and-move-in—you’re probably close to 70% pre-leasing on that pipeline. So I think we’ve been able to press rates to really recognize the value we’re delivering with these precious capacity blocks, in addition to the value we’re delivering to our enterprises, and outpacing the inflationary environment that we and the broader industry are experiencing. I think our team is doing a very nice job getting ahead of that on supply chain. Our consistency in markets—we’re growing to 65 markets, but we’re actually only operating 58. We’ve got eight that are, call it, in the works, including those recent announcements. We’re basically bringing on new capacity in 35 of those. So significant breadth of new growth for our customers. But being consistent, having extended supply chains, vendor-managed inventory programs, and I think we’re faring better than many or most when it comes to that, given our scale and breadth of consistency and track record in that capacity. I don’t think we want to waste time on the broader capital markets dynamic that everyone’s seeing with interest rates and the like, but I think Matt can speak to just the last few weeks or months—what we’ve done in terms of bolstering our liquidity at fairly attractive cost of capital. Matt Mercier (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, Eric. I mean, the fact that we have global reach and scale, it’s given us an ability to access a diverse set of capital sources. Both on—as recently on the debt side, hopefully you saw we raised basically 1.7 billion at an average rate of close to 4%, both through the euro and Swiss market. On top of that, given the expansion in our, call it, private capital strategy, as was noted on the call, raised another 1.4 of equity that will be able to be leveraged as well. So it gives us a significant amount, I think, of capital to continue to pursue what has been a great opportunity ahead of us. OPERATOR One moment for our next question, please. It comes from Michael Ng with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed. Michael Ng (Analyst) Hey, good afternoon. Thank you for the question. I wanted to ask about the stabilized hyperscale data center acquisition strategy. Could you talk a little bit about the buy box and opportunities that you have to drive additional returns, whether that be value add or other things? Thank you. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Michael. So I think I’ll have Greg speak to really what the evolution of our funding model here that’s led up to some pretty big milestones from the beginning of this year till just weeks ago to address that question. Greg Wright (Chief Investment Officer) Yeah, thanks. Thanks, Michael. Look, I think let’s go back and just, I mean this, where we are right now is really the next evolution of our strategic capital platform. As you recall, we completed our closed-end fund earlier this year with an initial target of two and a half billion and we ultimately raised 3.2 billion. The strategy for that vehicle was geared more towards development. It would be more, you know, development opportunities like you would expect, high teens, low 20s and the like. So that kind of vehicle is geared towards that kind of risk-return. I think when you look and see what we’re doing now, again this is the next evolution of our strategic private capital platform and this is focused more on a perpetual life strategy that’s designed really to match, call it, long-term duration institutional capital with long-lived stabilized data center assets. You know, quite frankly that gets to partner with an industry leader that’s got a 20-plus year track record. You know, look, with these initial closings we’re going to continue — and again it’s perpetual, this is just the first closing of a cornerstone process. There’ll be several closings between now and the beginning of next — or, excuse me, the first quarter of next year. But again, as a perpetual strategy, we’re going to continue to raise capital around that over time. So it’s not just, you know, it’s a living, breathing vehicle as growth opportunities come around and that will be geared towards, you know, more stabilized core-plus type returns. OPERATOR Thank you. Our next question is from Ari Klein with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed. Ari Klein (Analyst) Thanks and good afternoon. Wanted to follow up just on the 0 to 1 megawatt business. It’s clearly inflected higher here in terms of how you see things moving forward and kind of what the — is this the level which you kind of expect to grow off of? And then just relatedly, your peer talked about some of the pricing opportunities in 0 to 1 specifically, how are you thinking about that or seeing that? Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Ari. So I’ll have Colin walk through, which was really a fantastic quarter to cap off what’s been tremendous progress this year, and we’re already out of the gates in 4Q stronger than we ever have been. So Colin, why don’t you speak to that? Colin McLean (Chief Revenue Officer) Yeah, thanks, Ari, for the question. Appreciate that. Yeah, we’re really pleased with Q3, obviously. Fourth quarter, fourth consecutive quarter of record bookings, up 40% from a record quarter in Q2. Bunch of key drivers in that — we’re seeing this digital transformation and hybrid cloud continue to be resilient use cases; data sovereignty and localization are really standing out, particularly in EMEA. And Andy highlighted infrastructure is becoming more and more distributed with higher density requirements across the globe. So that really fits the use case that we support across the globe. And as it relates to the pipeline of activity, we’re seeing more and more partner contribution there, where really a full solution offering is particularly important with our partners as we think about pipeline on the whole. Remarkably, coming off a record quarter, we have as strong a pipeline as we’ve had in the 0 to 1 megawatt category. And that really is across-the-board commentary — that’s across all the regions. We’re seeing particular strengths, and as Andy highlighted, that’s across all use cases. But just to highlight, AI is becoming a more and more prevalent piece of that 0 to 1 megawatt conversation. So 44% of our bookings in Q3 were associated with AI. So again we’re seeing strength both in current activity and futures. And really pleased with what we’ve seen thus far in Q4, where we’re already at 60% of our 0 to 1 megawatt booking number. OPERATOR Thank you. Our next question is from Michael Rollins with Citi. Please proceed. Michael Rollins (Analyst) Thanks and good afternoon. Congratulations. If I could just ask about hyperscale for a couple moments. So on the hyperscale side, curious if you could talk a bit more of the pricing yields that you achieved in the quarter and whether that’s a bouncing off point of where things are going or if there is some specific factors that influence the significant level that you achieved on a per kilowatt basis. And then just taking a step back, curious if you could give us an update with the development pipeline now at about 10 gigawatts. Curious if you could frame how much is left to sell for ’27 vintage, ’28 and ’29 vintages as we think about kind of that flywheel that you’re generating on a go-forward basis. Thank you. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Michael. So, I mean, really standout quarter and a standout year when it comes to hyperscale as well. So I mentioned already, the total development pipeline now stands at 22 billion, north of 11.5% ROI, 63% leased. If you look at just the signings, we did 855 million total share signings — that’s 18% higher than our prior quarterly record roughly two years ago. If you look at our total signings year to date, we’re, call it, up 40% from the prior full-year record — and that’s just with three quarters, not four. So really dramatic volumes. Another standout is the weighted average lease length of the total signings — call it 16 years. As you know, our enterprise colo are on the shorter end, meaning our hyperscale is on the higher end to blend down to only 16 years, which is another standout. Great customer mix. If you look at, call it, the last seven quarters, we’ve had six different great hyperscale customers as our top signing customer. The markets — I mean the mix. Throughout the quarter I think we had the three biggest signings were each three different contracts, each 60-plus megawatts each. We started, as you may remember from the last quarter’s call, with some strong contribution in Northern Virginia. We ended the quarter with some strong contribution in APAC and we had some great wins in between as well. I think this goes back to really focusing on delivering for the hyperscalers where we can add the most value. We’ve stayed to those markets where we see robust and diverse demand, where supply constraints are tight and not really improving, and making sure that we can curate to all these hyperscale customers who we are already serving in 30, 40, 50-plus locations the growth capacity that they really need. Going to the second part of your question: our ’27–’28 hyperscale-oriented capacity blocks roughly total just shy of the 1.5 gigawatts that we currently have under development right now. So we’ve got a lot of conversations going as we speak, as those capacity build blocks are becoming much more of a focus for our customers. OPERATOR Thank you. Our next question comes from Matt Nicknam with Truist. Please proceed. Matt Nicknam (Analyst) Hey guys, congrats on a great quarter. Thanks so much for taking the question. High-level question: what’s the latest you’re seeing on the M&A front in terms of opportunities and valuations? And I guess the reason I’m asking is you’ve got a much cleaner balance sheet than you had several years ago. You’ve got global scale and I’m wondering if that affords a more unique opportunity to introduce value through M&A amidst the current market backdrop. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Matt. So, I mean, I don’t think we’ve got a great — we’re obviously in a very dynamic world with the cost of capital really changing as we speak. We’ve been very active on all things inorganic M&A that I’ll have Greg walk you through, and all of those have been with a strategic lens towards our growth pillars. Greg Wright (Chief Investment Officer) Yeah, thanks, Andy. Thanks, Matt. Look, I think as Andy mentioned, our M&A strategy — again I just want to be clear — has been and will continue to be aligned to the three pillars of growth that Andy outlined. And it’s really across the globe with a continued strategic focus on expanding in existing markets and entering new markets. You know, the first pillar, colocation enterprise. As you may recall, just going around the globe: in APAC, in early ’25 we entered Jakarta, Indonesia with a partnership with Bersama Digital Infrastructure. We then in 2Q26 entered into Cyberjaya, Malaysia. Going over to EMEA, in 4Q25 we entered into Lisbon, Portugal, and then in 1Q26 Milan, Italy. Also in 1Q26 we did a strategic acquisition of a business called Telepoint in Sofia, Bulgaria. And in this quarter you saw we entered into Turkey through a partnership with a group called Renaissance Infrastructure, which is really a leading infrastructure construction group based in Turkey. We then had existing market expansion in Frankfurt as well as in Crete. Then coming over to the Americas — just again this is on the colocation side — we had expansion in Franklin Park, Chicago in 4Q24; Uptown Charlotte in 1Q25; again the expansion of the existing market, a new submarket with an expansion in Fort Gillem, Atlanta, because there’s a component there that’s colocation as well; and then Vernon, California. And then, not finally, but in the hyperscale side — again, good activity. In Europe in 1Q26 we went into Milan, Italy. We expanded in Marseille, France in 2Q26. Then this quarter we acquired a freehold from a large hyperscale asset we have outside of Paris. Then in America, we’ve mentioned this somewhat on the call already, but expansion of our hyperscale business in Charlotte, Fort Gillem (Atlanta), Cartersville (Atlanta) in 1Q26; Kansas City; we had the Blackstone acquisitions of the three assets in Northern Virginia; in this quarter we’re expanding again in Charlotte, North Carolina; and then the Indianapolis acquisition that I already discussed. And then finally for the third leg of the stool, which is the strategic private capital, in the second quarter, as you recall, we completed the strategic acquisition of Columbia Capital. So I would say M&A has been and continues to be an important part of our business, and that’s how we align it. OPERATOR Thank you. One moment for our last question. It comes from the line of Michael Funk with Bank of America. Please proceed. Michael Funk (Analyst) Great. Thank you all for the question tonight. So there’s a pretty widely reported development delays across industry. Curious if Digital Realty Trust has seen any delays and, if you’re not, how you’re managing and avoiding delays others are experiencing. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, Mike. So we really are leaning into our expertise, our heritage, and just two-plus decades of solely focused on this. So whether it’s an existing market where we’ve been operating or building for years or new markets, it’s making sure that we, call it, get on the ground. We work with the local community, we make sure all the benefits that we’re going to deliver as a thriving member of that community — make sure that we are explaining that we’re supporting mission-critical infrastructure that is running their daily lives and making sure we’re giving back and doing it in a sustainable long-term fashion. It’s about making sure our vendors and partners know that we’re in this together with them. When hiccups happen, we can respond and use our supply chains. And the fact that we’re building across so many markets in our various regions always gives us, call it, swing capacity for certain components, whether it’s on the electrical side or the data center side. And that planning ahead and expertise has allowed us, by and large, to really, call it, keep our track record intact. Yes, there’s always here and there a delay. Often our customer needs some type of rework, and we’ll work with them. But I think this is where our business is really shining — that operational excellence — and that’s why we’re going to continue to deliver for our customers. OPERATOR Thank you. And this will conclude our Q&A portion of today’s call. I would like to turn the call back to Andy Power for his closing remarks. Andy Power (President and Chief Executive Officer) Thank you, Carmen. Digital Realty Trust’s momentum continued in the third quarter with strong execution, record leasing, and double-digit core FFO per share growth that supports another increase to our full-year guidance. While our record backlog provides strong visibility into 2027 and beyond, we are seeing strong demand across customers, geographies, and deployment types with the emergence of AI inference, enterprise adoption, and increasingly distributed architectures. These trends play directly to our strengths and our global full-spectrum platform and reinforce our confidence in the opportunity ahead. We are also strengthening our ability to capitalize on that opportunity as our scaling strategic private capital platform and investment-grade balance sheet provide the capital needed to support our customers as their requirements grow in size and complexity. These results are a team effort and I am incredibly proud of our talented colleagues around the world. Our momentum is strong and I’ve never been more excited about the opportunity ahead. Thank you all for joining us today, and thanks to our dedicated team for keeping the digital world turning. OPERATOR Thank you ladies and gentlemen and this concludes our conference. You may now disconnect. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:47
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:10
2d ago
|
Kimberly-Clark Corporation Announces Successful Completion of $4.9 Billion Private Offering of Senior Notes | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kimberly-Clark Corporation (NASDAQ: KMB) ("Kimberly-Clark"), a core S&P 500 component, announced today that it has closed its previously announced private offering (the "Offering") of senior unsecured notes in a combined aggregate principal amount of $4.9 billion (collectively, the "Notes"). The Notes were issued by Kimberly-Clark in five tranches: (i) $750,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.100% Notes due 2028, (ii) $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Notes due 2029, (iii) $1,250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.450% Notes due 2031, (iv) $750,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.650% Notes due 2034, and (v) $1,150,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.800% Notes due 2036."This transaction marks another milestone in the creation of a global consumer health and wellness leader," said Kimberly-Clark CFO, Nelson Urdaneta. "The new company offers an opening balance sheet structured for financial flexibility, consistent with Kimberly-Clark's long-track record of disciplined capital management. Our combination of synergy-driven earnings growth, strong free cash flow and scheduled debt maturities will enable de-leveraging on an accelerated basis to levels consistent with our current credit ratings." The Offering was conducted in connection with the previously announced proposed acquisition ("Acquisition") of Kenvue Inc., which remains subject to the satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions. Kimberly-Clark intends to use the net proceeds from the Offering, together with cash on hand and/or borrowings under its commercial paper program, to fund the cash consideration payable in connection with the Acquisition, and to pay related fees and expenses. Kimberly-Clark expects to use any remaining net proceeds from the Offering for general corporate purposes. The Notes have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or securities laws of any state or any other jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Notes are subject to restrictions on transferability and resale and may not be transferred or resold except as permitted under the Securities Act and other applicable securities laws, pursuant to registration or exemption therefrom. The Notes were offered and sold only (a) to persons reasonably believed to be "qualified institutional buyers" (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act) in compliance with Rule 144A under the Securities Act and (b) outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in compliance with Regulation S under the Securities Act. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or purchase, or a solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase, the Notes or any other security. No offer, solicitation, purchase or sale will be made in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. About Kimberly-Clark Kimberly-Clark (NASDAQ: KMB) and its trusted brands are an indispensable part of life for people in more than 175 countries and territories. Our portfolio of brands, including Huggies, Kleenex, Scott, Kotex, Cottonelle, Poise, Depend, Pull-Ups, Goodnites, Intimus, Plenitud, Sweety, Softex, Viva and WypAll, hold No. 1 or No. 2 share positions in approximately 70 countries. Our company's purpose is to deliver Better Care for a Better World. We are committed to using sustainable practices designed to support a healthy planet, build strong communities, and enable our business to thrive for decades to come. The KMB stock is a large cap growth and value stock and core S&P 500 equity held by more than 400 Exchange Traded Funds. Kimberly-Clark is considered a dividend aristocrat, having paid a cash dividend to shareholders for 92 consecutive years and increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. To keep up with the latest news and learn more about the company's more than 150-year history of innovation, visit the Kimberly-Clark website. Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this press release, including statements relating to the Acquisition and the intended use of net proceeds from the Offering, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are qualified by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations generally. There can be no assurance that these future events will occur as anticipated or that our results will be as estimated. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Forward-looking statements based upon the expectations and beliefs of the management of Kimberly-Clark as of the date they were made and speak only as of the date they were made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. Some of these forward-looking statements can be identified by words like "anticipate," "approximately," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "forecast," "intend," "may," "outlook," "plan," "possible," "potential," "predict," "project," "seek," "should," "target," "will" or "would," the negative of these words, other terms of similar meaning or the use of future dates. The assumptions used as a basis for the forward-looking statements include many estimates. Many factors outside our control, including risks and uncertainties around the Acquisition, could affect the realization of these estimates. Additional information and factors concerning these risks, uncertainties and assumptions can be found in Kimberly-Clark's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including the risk factors discussed in Kimberly-Clark's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and future filings with the SEC. Forward-looking statements included herein are made only as of the date hereof and Kimberly-Clark undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, or any other information in this press release, as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, or to correct any inaccuracies or omissions in them which become apparent. All forward-looking statements in this press release are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. SOURCE Kimberly-Clark Corporation |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:47
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:08
2d ago
|
Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick's management style: No chief of staff, no 'toxic' discretionary pay programs | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
ByYou're currently following this author! Click to unsubscribe from email alerts. Take-Two Interactive CEO and chairman Strauss Zelnick speaking at Business Insider's The Long Play in New York on October 29, 2026. Carl Timpone/BFA Strauss Zelnick is relentlessly focused on making "the best entertainment on earth." There's no confusion about that mission among his employees, he said. "I have 13,000 colleagues," the Take-Two Interactive CEO said at Business Insider's The Long Play event in New York City on Thursday. "100% of them can and will tell you exactly what I just said." His management philosophy — "establish a mission, establish a strategy, and promulgate collective culture" — is about to get its biggest test in years. Take-Two is the publisher behind popular games like "Red Dead Redemption" and "NBA 2K," and, on November 19, they'll launch a new "Grand Theft Auto." The wildly popular series hasn't had a new mainline installment since 2013 and has delayed its launch twice in an effort to meet the studio's exacting standards. GTA 6 is central to Take-Two's forecast for at least $8 billion in net bookings for fiscal 2027. Zelnick has run the company since 2007. To align employee incentives with Take-Two's big expectations, he believes compensation should be based on a formula aligned with the company's mission — not left to manager discretion. "I personally believe that discretionary compensation programs are toxic," he said, adding that they create "politics and get you the wrong results, especially over time." "So, we're all formulaic," he said. "You perform, the company performs — you get paid. You perform, the company doesn't perform — you don't get paid. Company performs, you don't perform — if you still have your job, you get paid." Zelnick also said he has no chief of staff, is available on Slack 24/7, and shares his cellphone number with employees. "If you're not president of the United States, you have no reason to have a chief of staff," he said. That doesn't mean he will swoop in and override an employee's manager, said Zelnick, who considers himself an empathetic listener. He said workers should feel heard — and that he will try to help them solve a problem. Still, he doesn't believe his formula at Take-Two is necessarily the right approach for every leader. "Leadership comes in all flavors," he said. "You have to be your own kind of leader, and I don't think anyone should adopt my skills, because you're not me." Read next Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know Ben Shimkus You're currently following this author! Click to unsubscribe from email alerts. Ben Shimkus is a reporter for the Business News desk. He writes about cars, transportation, retail, and jobs. Ben's reporting has appeared in Rolling Stone, The Verge, Automotive News, USA Today, AutoBody News, LGBTQ Nation, TopSpeed, and Out Magazine. He's also held staff writing positions at The U.S. Sun and the Daily Mail. He graduated from NYU with a Master's in journalism in 2024. Email Ben at [email protected] or message him privately on Signal at bshimkus.41. The Long Play |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:51
2d ago
|
UPS vs. FedEx: Which Stock Is the Better Buy After Strong Q3 Results? | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Key Takeaways UPS and FedEx stocks have rallied following strong Q3 results and raised financial guidance.UPS offers a cheaper valuation and significantly higher dividend yield than FedEx.FedEx boasts stronger earnings growth and stock performance, potentially justifying its premium.Shipping giants United Parcel Service (UPS - Free Report) ) and FedEx (FDX - Free Report) ) are drawing investors' attention after both companies delivered better-than-expected quarterly results this week and raised their financial outlooks. UPS stock has surged 13% this month, with FDX rising more than 7% amid improving earnings prospects and increased optimism surrounding the holiday shipping season. With both companies benefiting from cost-cutting initiatives and improving operational efficiency, which stock offers the better combination of growth, value, and dividend income? Image Source: Zacks Investment Research UPS vs FedEx: Q3 Results & Raised Guidance UPS reported Q3 adjusted earnings of $1.69 per share, beating expectations of $1.63 by nearly 4% but declining from $1.74 in the year-ago quarter, which benefited from a one-time $0.30-per-share gain from a sale-leaseback transaction. Still, UPS’s Q3 revenue increased roughly 7% year over year to $22.85 billion and exceeded estimates of $22.25 billion. Encouragingly, UPS raised its full-year revenue outlook to $92.6 billion from $91.2 billion and increased its adjusted EPS guidance to $7.28 per share, up from $7.22 previously. The company also lifted its free cash flow target to $6.1 billion, reflecting improving network efficiency and profitability. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Meanwhile, FedEx posted Q3 adjusted EPS of $3.74, easily surpassing expectations of $3.24 by 15% and increasing 28% from $2.93 a year ago, excluding the impact of its FedEx Freight spin-off. Revenue from continued operations jumped 12% to $22.85 billion and surpassed estimates of $22.33 billion, supported by higher shipping volumes, improved pricing, and cost reductions. FedEx also raised its fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $18.00-$18.60, compared with its previous forecast of $16.90-$18.10. Furthermore, management now expects revenue growth of approximately 12%, up from its previous forecast of 11%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Stock Performance & Valuation ComparisonFedEx has delivered stronger longer-term share-price performance, gaining 24% over the past year compared with UPS's 12% advance. FDX has gained a respectable 30% over the last three years, trailing the S&P 500 but far outpacing UPS's 23% decline. UPS's underperformance reflects a combination of post-pandemic shipping volume declines, restructuring costs, and greater vulnerability to broader macroeconomic headwinds. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research While FedEx has shown stronger momentum, UPS offers the more attractive valuation, trading near 13X forward earnings compared with 15X for FDX, although both trade at attractive discounts to the benchmark S&P 500. Trading around $106 a share, UPS's discounted valuation could offer greater upside if its restructuring initiatives generate sustainable earnings growth. However, at over $300 a share, FedEx's accelerating revenue and earnings growth may still justify its modest valuation premium. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research UPS & FDX Dividend ComparisonDespite its underperformance in recent years, UPS has a significant advantage for income-oriented investors, offering an annual dividend of $6.56 per share and a compelling 6.2% yield. While UPS offers nearly four times the dividend yield of FedEx, its annual payout represents over 90% of management's projected 2026 adjusted EPS, raising questions about future dividend growth and sustainability. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research In comparison, FedEx currently pays $4.88 annually, yielding approximately 1.6%. That said, FedEx offers a more conservative payout ratio that is under 30%, offering greater flexibility to return capital through share repurchases, including $2 billion in buybacks completed between June and September. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Conclusion & Strategic ThoughtsBoth UPS and FedEx appear attractive following their upbeat quarterly results and improved financial guidance. UPS may be the better choice for value and income investors, given its cheaper forward earnings multiple and substantially higher dividend yield. Conversely, FedEx looks more appealing for growth-oriented investors, supported by faster revenue growth, stronger earnings momentum, and its ongoing transformation initiatives. For now, both stocks land a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) following their sharp rallies, with further upside potentially hinging on upward revisions to FY27 earnings estimates after their strong Q3 results. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:43
2d ago
|
First Solar Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
First Solar (NASDAQ:FSLR) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. View the webcast at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/596409292 SummaryFirst Solar achieved approximately $1.2 billion in net sales for Q3 2026, with a gross margin of 58% and adjusted EBITDA of $744 million. The company is advancing its manufacturing expansion, with Series 7 CURE replication beginning in India in early 2027 and a focus on U.S. manufacturing to benefit from a supportive trade environment. First Solar’s backlog includes 44 gigawatts under contract, with significant bookings at 35 to 36 cents per watt. The company is shifting toward project-specific contracts for better allocation and delivery optimization. Plans include strategic initiatives such as advancing perovskite R&D and securing technology licensing agreements to bolster its next-generation technology roadmap. The company is considering the future of its Malaysia facility, with a decision on operations expected in the first half of 2027, while continuing to evaluate market conditions and trade policies. Full TranscriptOPERATOR Good afternoon and welcome to First Solar’s third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. This call is being webcast live on the Investors section of First Solar’s website at investor.firstsolar.com. All participants are in a listen-only mode, and please note that today’s call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Byron Jeffers, Head of Investor Relations. Byron Jeffers (Head of Investor Relations) Good afternoon and thank you for joining us. With me today are Mark Whitmar, Chief Executive Officer, and Alex Bradley, Chief Financial Officer. Mark will begin with an update on the business, followed by Alex with our financial results and outlook. Before we begin, today’s discussion will include forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties can be found in our earnings press release, other SEC filings, and the earnings material available on our Investor Relations website at investor.firstsolar.com. We undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events. During today’s call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided in our earnings press release and accompanying presentation. We encourage investors to review those reconciliations, as non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or a substitute for financial information prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. With that, I’ll turn it over to Mark. Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you and good afternoon. Getting on slide 4, we continue to execute with discipline this past quarter, advancing our U.S. manufacturing expansion, CURE deployment, and perovskite R&D program while delivering strong financial results. We generated approximately $1.2 billion in net sales, expanded gross margin to approximately 58%, and delivered adjusted EBITDA of $744 million. Operationally, our continued CURE deployment across the fleet is being executed through a disciplined learning pace approach that began with our Perrysburg Series 6 conversion in Q1 of this year. That approach now extends to our first Series 7 conversion at our India facility, expected to begin in the first quarter of 2027, which marks the start of Series 7 CURE replication across the fleet. Beginning in India allows us to first refine the deployment process in a low earnings impact environment before replicating across our U.S. Series 7 fleet during the subsequent U.S. conversions. Assuming a supportive trade environment, India front-end output is planned to be flexed to supply U.S. facilities, supporting U.S. back-end throughput and preserving partial domestic content and Section 45X eligibility during the transition. Accordingly, India’s finished good production in 2027 is expected to range from 2.2 gigawatts to 2.6 gigawatts. The pace and sequencing of subsequent Series 7 U.S. conversions will be informed by learnings from the India launch, consistent with the disciplined learning pace approach we have taken across all periods of technology transition. In South Carolina, our Series 6 finishing facility is being brought online in two phases as part of an integrated manufacturing flow from Vietnam. The first phase started production in Q3. The second phase is expected to reach commercial launch in mid-2027. As we previously shared, we delayed the second phase by approximately a quarter so that the CURE could be incorporated at commercial launch. Together, these two phases are expected to result in 2027 South Carolina production of 2.2 to 2.5 gigawatts. Beyond CURE, we continue to advance our next-generation technology roadmap. Our Ohio pilot line, designed to produce Series 6-size perovskite modules, remains on track to reach operational readiness in the first half of 2027. We expect this line will enable field deployment of modules to further capture learnings and validate the manufacturing performance and durability profile of this next-generation thin film technology before we undertake broader scaling decisions. Our licensing agreement with Cubic PV announced earlier today, together with our previously announced intellectual property agreement with Oxford PV, continues to support the development roadmap, providing access to foundational perovskite IP as we advance our technology roadmap. Turning to the market environment on slide 5, the Section 232 proclamation issued in August represents a meaningful shift for U.S. solar manufacturing, and we believe First Solar is well positioned to benefit as this shift takes effect. Combined with fundamentals such as continued demand strength from load growth and data center expansions, we see a long-term opportunity to translate this position into earnings growth. Section 232 represents a structural change in how the United States approaches solar manufacturing. As the U.S. competes for global leadership in artificial intelligence and the emerging low Earth orbit economy, secure and affordable power will be foundational to both. The country cannot afford to depend on adversarial nations for technologies and supply chains increasingly central to our long-term economic prosperity and national security. As a technology company and the only fully integrated utility-scale solar manufacturer without dependency on a Chinese crystalline silicon supply chain, we believe we are structurally positioned to benefit from this environment. Note, by 2027 nearly 80% of our global module manufacturing footprint will be located in the U.S. Long-term demand fundamentals also remain strong. AI-related infrastructure, electrification, and the onshoring of U.S. manufacturing are driving significant load growth. These customers need large-scale power quickly, and solar plus storage remains one of the fastest and lowest-cost solutions. They are increasingly focused on availability, delivery certainty, bankable warranties, and supply chain security—attributes we have built our business around. As it relates to bookings, we believe the market is working through a transition following the Section 232 announcement, with significant influence from other key factors. As a reminder, a substantial portion of our existing backlog is comprised of multi-year framework agreements that are intended to supply customers with projects in various stages of development. While entering into these types of agreements has historically driven significant additions to our backlog, they can also be more challenging for us to plan for and allocate against because of the inherent delivery timing uncertainty associated with projects in early stages of development. Over the course of this year, while not closing the door on framework agreements with appropriate contractual protections, our customer engagements have shifted more towards project-specific contracting with defined projects and delivery schedules. From our perspective, the enhanced certainty surrounding project-specific contracts allows us to optimize module allocation and delivery, with a potential trade-off of slowing the pace of an extended multi-year contracted backlog. At the same time, customers are focused on advancing mid- and late-stage projects where modules have already been secured, while deferring procurement on early-stage projects requiring delivery later in the decade. We see several factors driving this behavior, including increased NIMBYism among community residents and growing state and local government opposition. In addition, the overall inflationary environment, together with the continuously evolving tariff landscape, have challenged near-term project economics and require greater strategic planning on behalf of our development customers to address system cost increases unrelated to module pricing. As one example, in certain cases surging battery prices is challenging both projects in construction as well as projects at the PPA bid stage. Lastly, an incomplete regulatory picture with regards to the final ITC guidance, as well as the potential for Section 232 tariffs to continue to evolve, particularly as it relates to minimum import prices and the effectiveness of anti-stocking measures, has generated volatility in the module procurement market and inhibited customer clarity as it relates to module pricing discovery. The impact of these current dynamics on recent bookings is most pronounced from our Malaysia facility. While Vietnam is expected to supply the semi-finished product for our South Carolina finishing facility, Malaysia retains the capacity to produce fully finished international modules. We continue to evaluate demand for this product based on core unit economics, tariffs and trade conditions, and customer contracting terms. We expect the operating decision regarding our Malaysia facility to be binary, resulting in either operations at full or near full capacity of 1.8 gigawatts annually, or a shutdown of production, with that decision expected in the first half of 2027. Given Malaysia’s relatively small contribution to our manufacturing footprint, limited Series 6 blending opportunity in the U.S. absent Section 45X credits, and freight and tariff burdens, we do not expect either outcome to materially impact our run-rate earnings profile. Against this backdrop, we remain deliberate on bookings, and we are pleased with the results of this approach. Through today, in the U.S., our largest market, we have booked approximately 4.9 gigawatts at approximately 35 to 36 cents per watt inclusive of adjusters. Moreover, our 44-gigawatt backlog gives us the ability to focus our contracting approaches on two strategic initiatives. First, we seek to improve pricing on new module sales relative to our current backlog ASPs. Note, pricing will continue to vary by product—Series 6 and Series 7—and by U.S.- versus internationally made. Second, we seek to improve contract structures to further mitigate the risk of cost increases beyond our control, strengthen credit support and payment terms, and firm up product delivery schedules. Our objective is to optimize across both upfront ASPs as well as long-term earnings profile through disciplined pricing, appropriate contractual protections, strong counterparties, and alignment with our manufacturing and delivery strategy. In summary, our focus on project-specific versus framework agreements, customer focus on near-term project execution versus late-dated procurement, evolving market price discovery, and our contracting discipline have moderated recent bookings on a volume basis but, on an economic basis, has generated improved pricing relative to our overall backlog. In addition, we remain focused on our ability to effect our contracting strategic initiatives and are confident in demand for our domestically produced product, particularly for 2020, 24.9 and beyond when we have available supply. With that, I turn the call over to Alex to discuss our bookings, financial results, and outlook. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Thanks, Mark. Turning to our bookings and backlog on Slide 6. We ended the quarter with 44 gigawatts under contract, representing approximately $13.5 billion contracted value exclusive of technology adjusters, with scheduled deliveries extending through 2030. Since our last earnings call, we recorded approximately 1.4 gigawatts of additional U.S. gross bookings at an average selling price of approximately $0.36 per watt, inclusive of applicable technology adjusters. Importantly, substantially all of this volume was contracted or in late-stage negotiations and pricing and terms were largely set ahead of the Section 232 announcement. In addition, there remains approximately 4 gigawatts of variable volume associated with previously signed contracts not currently part of the contracted backlog but pricing reflective of the pre-Section 232 environment which our customers have the ability to exercise as of a date. Approximately half of this volume has a decision date within the next five months with the other half spread across the remainder of 2027 and 2028. Should our customers elect to receive this volume, it will be recognized as incremental bookings at the time of such election. During the quarter, we also continued customer notifications related to contractual technology adjusters aligned with our production plan and intended deployment sequence. These notifications represent a meaningful source of incremental backlog value as CURE deployment advances across the fleet, with the majority of the adjusted value expected to be realized in 2027 and 2028. With respect to adjuster-eligible volume, we would note that the ultimate realization of these adjustments is subject to the achievement of the underlying technology milestones, timing of future customer notifications and module delivery schedules, and other contractual conditions, and therefore the final value and timing may differ from the amounts and periods described. Of that potential adjusted value, approximately 20% is currently associated with 2027 deliveries, with the remainder weighted to 2028 and beyond. As we continue to progress customer notifications associated with existing bookings tied to our CURE deployment sequence, together with new bookings removing the adjuster concept as we sell our CURE product with the technology embedded in the base ASP, the value of the adjusters will roll off over time. So, on to Slide 7. Net sales for the third quarter were approximately $1.2 billion, a decrease of approximately 23% year over year. The decrease was primarily driven by lower module volumes sold to third parties compared to the prior-year period. Gross margin was approximately 58%, up roughly 20 percentage points year over year. The year-over-year increase was driven primarily by a high mix of U.S.-produced margins. Gross margin also benefited from lower sales rate underutilization costs, tariffs and duties, partially offset by lower termination-related revenue. Operating expenses were approximately $167 million. Research and development expense was approximately $67 million, reflecting continued investment in our technology roadmap including perovskite development. Net income was $571 million, up approximately 25% year over year. Adjusted EBITDA was $744 million, near the upper end of our previously communicated Q3 preview range, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 60%. Diluted earnings per share were $5.30 compared with $4.24 in the prior-year period. Turn to our balance sheet and capital allocation on Slide 8. We ended the quarter with approximately $1.5 billion of net cash, remaining within our long-term target net cash range of $1.5 to $2 billion. Our balance sheet and projected cash generation continue to provide substantial financial flexibility. In February we laid out our approach to capital structure and capital allocation. This prioritized maintaining the aforementioned $1.5 to $2 billion of net cash to provide resiliency to cyclicality and industry volatility and to use additional cash to focus on growth, technology deployment, innovation, R&D technology roadmap advancements and M&A, especially related to complementary technology-adjacent opportunities. We further stated that we would evaluate applying cash generation in excess of the above capital priorities to share repurchases pending clarity around certain factors including policy catalysts, new bookings, volume and tax credit monetization. In line with this approach and following the Section 232 proclamation issued in Q3, our board has authorized a share repurchase program of up to $500 million, effective immediately with no expiration date. This authorization reflects confidence in the long-term value of the business while preserving our disciplined approach to capital allocation and ability to continue investing in technology development and growth. Turning to Slide 9, our full-year 2026 guidance is updated to reflect a lower range of India domestic and international Series 6 and U.S. finishing volume sold, with an associated reduction in revenue and adjusted EBITDA. As we stated in our original guidance in February, we entered the year assuming our India facility would flex production as needed to match acceptably priced India-based demand in an inherently short book-to-bill cycle market. We’ve accordingly reduced our full-year India domestic volume sold forecast by approximately 0.7 gigawatts. We also stated in February that we entered the year assuming limited in-year demand for our Series 6 international product, and bookings activity for 2026 deliveries has remained consistent with that assumption. While the low end of our total U.S. component volume sold forecast reflects a modest reduction based on reduced Series 6 WIP share products sold, our forecast range for fully domestic product sold remains unchanged. As we look forward to next year, subject to a supportive policy and trade environment, we expect to increase exports from our India facility to the U.S. market to optimize the margin potential from this factory. As Mark discussed, we expect to make a decision on the long-term operating path for our Malaysia facility in the first half of 2027. Core operating expenses primarily increase as a function of increased legal spend associated with defending our TOPCon intellectual property position, which we believe has the potential to drive future revenue and earnings upside, and increased R&D spend on perovskite development. Note our full-year perovskite-related spend, originally forecast at approximately $100 million, is now expected to total approximately $120 million. This is forecast to increase in 2027 as we seek to advance this next-generation advanced technology. Core OPEX increases were offset by a delay in certain startup expenses at our South Carolina facility, now expected in mid-2027, leaving our total 2026 operating expense guidance unchanged. Net cash guidance remains unchanged, with reduced cash inflows from volume sold offset by a reduction to forecasted capex. In summary, we remain well positioned as we close out 2026 and look forward to 2027, driven by a U.S. policy framework supporting true domestic manufacturing, continued load growth as the United States competes to lead in AI, and utility-scale solar’s ambition to meet the cost and speed-to-power requirements of a rapidly modernizing U.S. economy. These drivers align well with our 44 gigawatt contracted backlog for mostly nearer-term deliveries and greater module supply availability in the 2028 and beyond timeframe, which we expect to see further improvements in pricing and contractual terms relative to our existing backlog. We continue to invest in our future, including our staged CURE technology replication across the fleet and increased perovskite spend in R&D, IP partnerships, and our Perrysburg pilot line. Our strong balance sheet allows us continued investment in the business while concurrently enabling capital return to shareholders. With that, operator, please open the line. OPERATOR We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Please limit yourself to one question. If you would like to ask a question, please press Star-1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press Star-1 again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Moses Sutton with BNP Paribas. Moses, your line is now open. Moses Sutton (Analyst at BNP Paribas) Thanks for taking that question, and thanks for all the color. Maybe you could elaborate on what seems like literally zero urgency for developers to book ’29 volumes. I sort of get the point on there’s NIMBYism, there’s project economics, there’s carrots. But we also hear from developers they expect to really do a lot of safe harbor volume in ’20—you know, panel prices will structurally go up 50%. They don’t have inventory that extends that far out, even if they do for the next two years. So, sorry for the long question, but would there be a strategy change that’s necessary? Would you cut price to 34–35 cents and book the rest of the decade? It would seem there’s a little more urgency for ’29 than there used to be. Maybe to elaborate a little more, because we do still expect at least tens of gigawatts of TAM each year in ’29 and ’30. Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, look, I think the first thing I think we just need to maybe step back and reflect on is that everyone obviously is evaluating the execution against their development pipeline, and there’s near-term initiatives and areas of focus that they’re concentrating on right now. And disruptions at certain times, as we indicated, even as it relates to whether it’s battery costs or other component costs, or impact of tariffs that are swinging various projects around—people are all trying to work through that. They’re trying to secure their financing. There’s still interconnection challenges that people are working through. And then probably the biggest issue that people are continuing to struggle with right now is just the challenges that are continuing to happen in local communities, even at the state level in particular from a government standpoint, and trying to push back on deployment of data centers, as we indicated, maybe as a comment that we had in our prepared remarks. So there’s a lot that they’ve got going on right now. So engagements that we are having right now with customers—and we are starting to book a pipeline of opportunities that are going out into that horizon, and some even beyond ’29, going into ’30 and beyond as well—but everyone’s kind of like, I’ve got all these near-term things I’m focused on at this point in time; I’ve got to work through these, get everything addressed. They’re trying to digest the implications of what happens with the full implementation around 232. People are still trying to think through, well, the guidance is going to come out sometime either later this year or beginning of next year. And so I think there’s clarity that everybody’s looking for at that point in time. So I think it’s just a matter of the timing of letting some of this work its way through and where their near-term priorities are to then think through the balance of the decade and what they still need to do. I mean everyone’s really concerned now with meeting their 48 safe harbor requirements, which these projects have to be safe harbored by and completed and commissioned by the end of 2028. And there’s not as much focus going further out into the horizon, and that’s largely what we’re seeing from customers. Just a couple of other comments. So we said on the call that we were seeing this year challenges in near-term book-to-bill on our international volume, and if that ties into what we said before, we don’t want to be in the spot market. That’s a challenging place for us to be. But if you look at our contracted backlog, we’re still booked out a couple of years in advance. So when you talk about urgency around booking 2029, obviously we’d like to see bookings momentum, we’re open for business, but I don’t think we have a desperate urgency to be booking in that horizon right now. And we also talked on the call in the prepared remarks around how we’re thinking about contracting, and we’re looking increasingly at individual projects versus large frameworks. And we’re happy to take framework deals with the right set of structural protections within them, but we’ve seen more and more customers actually looking at individual project deals and we’ve been looking at that. And generally speaking, that’s going to give you shorter-term visibility relative to 2029. So if it’s trying to book specific deals, specific projects, the amount of clarity you have for 2029 is a lot less than if you were looking at framework horizons. So there’s that piece to factor in as well. And one thing I should have mentioned too, I think it’s just a really good example to highlight the dynamics that are going on right now. We were in negotiations with a customer for a 2 gigawatt procurement decision that was largely into final negotiations and documentation associated around the agreement. And the particular state that this project was being developed put a moratorium in place and the whole project stopped. Right. And this has happened after the announcement of the 232. So, you know, customers are just uncertain. And when that level of uncertainty does happen, then they’re not going to be making commitments until they get better clarity. Moses Sutton (Analyst at BNP Paribas) Very helpful, thank you. OPERATOR Your next question comes in the line of Joseph Osha with Guggenheim. Joseph, your line is now open. Joseph Osha (Analyst at Guggenheim) Thanks very much. Following a little bit on Moses’s question, you know, Alex, you mentioned that bookings we’re seeing now reflect conversations that were undertaken prior to 232. Can you maybe give us a little bit of a preview on where conversations are landing for conversations that commenced post 232? Thank you. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, maybe I’ll add a little bit of color around that. Since the announcement of 232, we have revised and increased our pricing. In some cases they were deals that were still in the early stage of negotiations, so we have increased pricing in those negotiations with customers. And if it’s a new opportunity that’s come in our way, that wasn’t even in any form of conversation prior to the 232, then those prices have gone up relative to what we would have been indicating previously. We still have to work through all those issues, right? And I think anytime you get through here in an environment of rising prices, there’s a lot of price discovery that’s going to get done. You know, everyone’s going to go out and they want to evaluate all of their options and sort of discover where they think the pricing can be for different dynamics and whether they need the domestic content or how much of the domestic content from a point standpoint do they need. You know, so they’re going to do a lot of heavy lifting to sort of figure out and triangulate what makes the most sense, partly because they also have to, in most cases, go back and get approval through their boards. And when you see a price point in the market that was there previously and now that price point has increased significantly, then everybody has to then sort of do their due diligence around that. So what I would say is the deals that, some of the deals that we have announced in this quarter were priced before the 232. In cases where we were in earlier negotiations with customers after the 232, we have looked to try to increase that, and then clearly any new opportunities that have kind of informed a more comprehensive view of what we think the pricing environment’s like today. But like I said, the price discovery is going to take a while before you’ll start to see that volume being executed. OPERATOR Your next question comes in the line of Philip Shen with Roth Capital. Philip, your line is now open. Philip Shen (Analyst at Roth Capital) Hey all, thanks for taking the questions. In terms of price, just to continue with the conversation, the price discovery may take some time. It sounds like you have 4 gigawatts of which maybe 2 gigawatts needs to be decided on in the next five months. And so just curious, what are we talking about now in terms of where pricing could go to? In the crystalline silicon world, we’ve quantified it as pricing has gone up 10 to 20 cents a watt, depending on the product and maybe timing, and so that’s a big move. And I understand the price discovery kind of patience or timing that people need because they have to process kind of this upside shock to their economics. And so I was wondering if you can share with us a little bit of what you could book in the next quarter, and then what kind of price do you think you might get? Thanks. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, Phil, the one thing on price too, I just want to make sure that we’ve highlighted this before. It does vary by, and we have it in our prepared remarks. I mean, the price for us for our Series 6 product is different than our Series 7 product. Our high domestic content product is different than a fully international, you know, imported module. So there’s going to be a distribution of what that pricing could look like. And so if I’m selling something that’s being imported from Malaysia, as an example, that’s going to be at the low end of that continuum. And if I’m selling our Series 7 product that’s domestically manufactured here in the US, then that’s going to be at the high end. So there’s going to be a continuum around pricing. You know, as it relates to, we just announced again, I think another quarter at 36 cents or something like that since the last call — call to call, I think it was around 36 cents. And, you know, we have deals — that’s an average — we have deals that are above that, and that’s a momentum that we’d like to continue to carry forward. But, you know, I also want to be careful — we’ve got to put a marker out there with so much that still is fluid and still evolving. I don’t want to give an indication of what that price realization could be. We’re just going to work to try to see how we can engage the market and capture the highest value relative to, you know, competitive alternatives. And if crystalline silicon stays in the range that you reference, then that gives us quite a bit of opportunity to improve pricing dynamics for our technology. But a lot of work still to go to get there. Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) So maybe just two other comments. As it relates to the volume that we already have that may get elected by customers, that’s going to range from somewhere close to the current backlog average to somewhere close to where we’re pricing now. So you’re going to see a variety in that, but it’s going to be between what we see historically and what we’re seeing currently. And then as you think about future pricing, crystalline silicon pricing is still most likely for deals in the next 12 to 24 months. And I don’t think there’s a good marker for that price point when you get out into the late ’28, ’29, ’30 timeframe, which is when we have most available product to sell. So one of the reasons I think customers are still doing price discovery is they don’t necessarily have a good benchmark that far out that’s reliable or trustworthy. And so we’re still working through our pricing relative to where we think the market is and customers trying to understand our pricing relative to where they think that market point will be. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, and I think the other point maybe I’ll highlight as well, Phil, is that, look, we still have a little bit of time before we get to full implementation on the 232. And what I will say is I’ve been very happy to hear the kind of enforcement focus that Commerce has to address stockpiling. The problem is there’s such an aggressive posture and risk-taking that people are willing to do in order to get a module into the US at some pre-232 MIP. And so we’re hearing a lot of stories of the extent people are going to in order to try to get product into the market, whether it’s at the cell level or whether it’s at the module level, and just aggressively pushing the envelope. And I know Commerce is doing a great job of trying to enforce that and to prevent that from happening and stopping that. But, you know, the onslaught of this stuff is coming from every angle. And so I think there’s also that piece that people are waiting for — let’s let, you know, maybe there’ll be a lot more product that does make it into the market somehow. And a customer may say, I’m willing to wait and buy some time because maybe I can get an opportunity to get some pre-232 volume that’s been imported into the market at some crazily low price. And that’s informing their decision, or at least creating a willingness to wait. And, you know, we obviously are there to encourage Commerce to do whatever they can to ensure that enforcement of preventing that stockpiling. But it’s not stopping the activities. You know, people are willing to take a lot of risk and it’s very aggressive, and we’ll have to see how effective Commerce could be. So far, you know, we applaud them for their efforts. There’s no doubt about that. Philip Shen (Analyst at Roth Capital) Yeah, so far they’ve blocked, I think we’ve learned about 60 importers blocked up until about two weeks ago, and that’s out of an importer count of, I think, 400. Pre-232 we learned that it was 200, and then post-232 that jumped up to 400. They’ve blocked at least close to 60, so looks like they’re working — the enforcement is pretty aggressive. Any thoughts on that? And then how much higher MIPs could go up and what kind of timing that could be? Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I think on the enforcement, I mean, I don’t know if some of you may know that we did our ribbon cutting for our new factory in South Carolina and the secretary was there and a number of his key members of his team were there. So it gave us a great opportunity to talk with them and to sort of continue to emphasize the importance of this enforcement, and they’re 100% committed on the enforcement side and to do everything they can to prevent those types of things from happening. And where we can, we are sharing insights with them and things we think could be helpful from that standpoint. It’s just, to your point, I mean, the risk tolerance that people are willing to take, knowing that there’s going to be that level of enforcement, is not slowing things down very much. I mean, yes, you can get 60 out of the, you know, if the number of importers of record went up from 200 to 400 and it’s great that we caught 60 of them, but that means there’s another 140 that potentially are still getting around the current enforcement levels, right. So, and then as it relates to the MIPs, and look, I think it’s very clear, and if you haven’t seen Luckman’s remarks at our ribbon cutting, I think you just ought to watch it. There’s a couple of videos that are out there and he’s 100% clear on the strategic intent of what we’re trying to do here, which is to create US manufacturing, US jobs, US supply chain, US technology, and things that can help enable energy independence and national security. And so they’re going to enforce this and they’re going to put the right requirements in place to ensure the domestic manufacturing can thrive and then put as many incentives as possible to encourage people to manufacture more here in the US, which I think is great. OPERATOR Your next question comes from the line of Brian Lee with Goldman Sachs. Brian, your line is now open. Brian Lee (Analyst at Goldman Sachs) Hey guys, thanks for taking the questions. I know we’re kind of all dancing around the same topic, so I’ll try my best as well. But, you know, it sounds like you guys are moving from being a contract go-to-market strategy to more of a spot market go-to-market strategy, which, you know, I think most of your peers do and that was the case even for First Solar cycles ago. So, you know, maybe as you said, Mark, the bookings cadence moderates here with all the uncertainties, but the bookings cadence can potentially be more fluid on a quarter-to-quarter basis, I guess. Is that fair and are you equipped, I guess from a salesforce perspective, to be able to manage through that? And then again, on the pricing entitlement side of things that you keep referring to, developers and all the uncertainties that they’re having to grapple with, I guess what are you tasking your sales force with in terms of this price discovery process post 232? I would imagine they’re not going to go anywhere lower than what you’ve been booking at recently, which is 36 cents. But, you know, is it a range of like 36 to 40, 40 cents plus? What are the puts and takes around what they’re going out to market with? Thank you. Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. So I think what we were trying to say, Brian, just as it relates to a lot of the deals that we announced going back three, four years ago, we built our contract backlog. A lot of these were multi-year framework agreements that had indicative delivery schedules associated with them. And then, as we said before, they had certain rights of annual shift rights or quarterly shift rights. Things could move around from that contracted schedule, but it wasn’t tied to a specific project. And what’s happened when we do that is the volatility of our customers’ development pipeline, for various reasons, it just whipsaws stuff all over the place, right, in terms of, hey, this is what the contract was and now this is what the current requirements are given the state of their development portfolio and projects and what have you. And what we’re trying to do now a little bit—and not that we won’t get back to that; we’ve got a couple of very large deals where they’d be more of that legacy kind of framework agreements, strategic partnerships, and we’ll clearly do those—but near term what we’re seeing more is that everybody’s like, I’ve got a particular project and I want to negotiate this particular project. And that gives us better clarity and certainty of the project: where it sits in its permitting process, where it sits in its interconnection process, where it is in its financing—if it’s approaching that—or at least we know what the timeline, the profile looks like, and it gives us better clarity of the timing of when the shipments need to occur. So that’s where the near-term focus is on that. But what I would say is that after this price discovery kind of gets better understood, I think we may see some customers moving in that other direction to say I really want to lock in and secure my project pipeline going out into ’29, ’30. And I said we have some customers that are even wanting to start having some conversations that go beyond 2030. So as it relates to the salesforce—as someone alluded to that—first off, from a capacity standpoint, I don’t think it’s an issue with our capabilities of our sales team to handle that pivot to more project-specific versus framework structures. But as I somewhat alluded to, we have gone and we’ve repriced deals that were in the early negotiation phase, and any deals that have come to us now are obviously reflective of what we believe the current market pricing should be. So I’m not going to give you an indication of what that looks like, but we have recalibrated and I think the market fully understands that. But I also want to continue to go back: there is a continuum of what those prices are going to be in the near term, and I think I’ve even alluded to this in prior calls. What we have right now available to book is more, you know, Malaysia finished good module coming into the U.S. or an India product coming into the U.S. And so that profile, in terms of ASP entitlement, is going to be on the lower end of that continuum. As I indicated, the lowest price point we would have for a module will be for that international product—fully finished international product—coming into the U.S., and then the highest will be kind of 100% domestically manufactured Series 7. So it can move around. That average is reflected in the numbers that we’ve been giving you, but at any particular quarter, if I’m heavy on maybe international modules coming to the U.S., that would drive that average ASP down and clearly we’ll provide color around that. But, yeah, pricing is re-establishing itself at a higher point than it has been historically and we’ll continue to see how price discovery works through. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Brian, just one follow-on point to that framework discussion, and one of the challenges that we’ve talked about over the last couple of years now is the period cost that we’ve been incurring around the amount of inventory we have to keep, the storage cost of that inventory, overall sales rate. If you think about when there’s an ability to move volume around, or when customers need to do that because the timing of their projects shift, I have to keep inventory to make sure I can service all the available contracts that I have. So that generally means my overall inventory position is worse, my working capital position is worse. At the same time then, if that product all does move to the right from a schedule perspective, now I end up having to warehouse materially more volume than I expected. So generally speaking it’s become harder for us to plan around that and we’re seeing a significant financial impact from that. If we move to more of a project-based model where there’s a certainty around an individual project, the timing of that project, and delivery schedule, that allows me to plan on the operational side much more efficiently, reduce working capital, reduce storage costs as well. So it provides that operational financial efficiency that we’re looking for. OPERATOR Your next question comes from the line of John Wyndham with UBS. John, your line is now open. John Wyndham (Analyst at UBS) Hey, perfect. Mark and Alex, I appreciate you taking the questions. We’ll get onto the exciting topic of filing your taxes. So in the presentation you note there’s 1.9 billion of government grant receivables. My understanding is that’s payable two to three months after you file your annual returns. Can you just give us an indication of how your planning is for that cash actually going to your balance sheet and then into your bank account, and then any comments around the liquidity in the second-hand market if you were to decide to try to monetize those early. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) Thanks again. Yeah, so you’re right. On the balance sheet there’s about 1.9 billion. About 100 of that’s related to India. So you’ve got about 1.8 in the U.S., and then part of that 1.8 relates to credits that were generated last year. And we’ve yet to file. Yet. We have just filed our tax return, but yet to receive refundability for those. But if you look at this year’s credit generation, the forecast is about 2.1 billion of credit to be generated this year. If you look at the 2024 credits, we sold most of those. We did keep a portion of them and filed our 2025 tax return in October of 2025, and we received a refund for what was about 120 million in about three months’ time. And importantly, even within that three months, the government was actually shut down for about a month of that. So the turnaround time from filing to receiving the cash relatively short. As it relates to this year, we haven’t made a decision yet. We’ve not made any assumption around a reduction in the carrying value of those credits if we were to sell them. We’ve seen that the market through the first half of this year I think was a little softer for credit sale values. That’s picked up pretty significantly towards the back end of the year as large corporates just have better position and understanding of their tax position coming into year-end and looking for tax planning strategies. So we’re seeing a lot more outreach and interest around those credits. We’re in some discussions around potential sales there, but we’ll look to balance how much we would like to sell to pull some liquidity forward versus how much we’re comfortable filing for refundability for, because then you’re not taking a discount on that sale. So it’s a balancing act and we’re in discussions around those at the moment. OPERATOR Your next question comes from the line of David Arcaro with Morgan Stanley. David, your line is now open. David Arcaro (Analyst at Morgan Stanley) Well, hey, thanks so much for taking my questions. I was wondering, with the shift toward individual project booking, typically, you know, what’s the time frame for how far in advance you would end up getting that order into your backlog, relative to, I guess, the timing of the project? And I think you had suggested that the decision on Malaysia could be made in the first half of 2027. Are you thinking that we’ll get enough kind of visibility by that time that you’ll be able to make that call on what to do with that capacity? Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I’ll take the first one. I’ll let Alex take the Malaysia comment. So, yeah, basically what happens if you’re bidding specific to a project, modules are usually at the forefront of your procurement-led decision. You want to secure that technology because it also drives your design of the factory — or the design of the project, excuse me. So, you know, crystalline silicon and cad-tel will design your factory and your plant, excuse me, differently. There’s different string count, different voltage, and other parameters you would want to optimize for. Generally we don’t have the same constraints as it relates to the tracking/backtracking requirements because we don’t deal with the same adverse impact of shade or diffuse light and those types of things. So there’s a lot that has to be done early on, and you’re going to want to source that module and lock that up so you can be unencumbered to figure out how you want to design and optimize at the project level. So it could be, you know, 18 months, two years before the first delivery would start to happen, or at least for sure until the project would be commissioned. So it shortens your timeline a little bit from a visibility standpoint, but it doesn’t really significantly shorten it. But it gives you better certainty, there’s no doubt about that. You know, people would be willing to go out into 2030 in a framework kind of construct, and projects normally would be commitments that would go out into, you know, ’28 or into early ’29 is probably about as far out as they would want to go, but still more than enough visibility to properly understand the project and price it appropriately. Alex Bradley (Chief Financial Officer) And David, as it relates to Malaysia, yeah, I do believe we’ll have enough visibility going into the first half next year. We’ve effectively been carrying that asset running at very low throughput for the whole of this year. And we’ve done that deliberately. We could talk — the underutilization costs associated with that was worth the option value of having the ability to run what would be up to about 1.8 gigawatts of international volume. As we look through the 232 announcement, as Mark said, the customer base is still in a transition, fully understanding what that looks like and trying to work through what their need is going to be. We want to make sure we have the optionality in Malaysia in the event that that significant demand does materialize. We’ve also said that we have an order of how we want to make sure our factories sell. So first we look to make sure our U.S. content is sold. Secondly, we look to make sure we’re selling our finishing line production out of our new facility in South Carolina, and then after that the full international product. We’re also going to be bringing more volume from India over into the U.S. next year, subject to a trade and tariff environment that makes sense. So I think we’ll have the understanding of the marketplace that we’ll need by the first half of next year, and we’re still looking at that as an option value and seeing how the effect of the 232 plays out. OPERATOR Your next question comes from the line of Vikram Bagri with Citi. Vikram, your line is now open. Vikram Bagri (Analyst at Citi) Good evening, everyone. Apologize for another question on pricing, but this is important. On this call itself, we’ve heard pricing either go down by a couple of cents or go up by 20 cents. Mark, fully appreciate the lack of clarity about the environment. But for Series 7, is there a construct you can provide for pricing that we should keep in mind? So if pricing for silicon-based panels moves higher, we should assume a certain discount to that which some people will characterize as quality discount. And I imagine pricing also depends on several other factors — project and contractors. But all else being equal, is there a construct where, if pricing for silicon-based panels moves higher than $0.40 or $0.45, we should assume a certain fixed discount for U.S. Series 7? And then related to that, Mark, you talked about a number of items limiting ability of developers to make long-term plans. Is competition in panel manufacturing also one of the factors which is sort of prohibiting them from committing to the supply of panels? Do you think the lack of urgency to book 2029 is also a function of new capacity coming online potentially in the U.S. from other suppliers of panels? Or how do you see the competition evolve over the next couple of years in the sector? Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you. Yeah, so I’ll talk on. So if you take Series 7 as an example — and just one thing to make clear, you made a comment about a quality discount. I don’t know if you’re familiar with how energy predictions are done for crystalline silicon technology. They actually have a quality factor that they use which basically reduces the energy profile of the technology as part of the energy prediction, which does not apply at all to First Solar technology. So we don’t have any quality factors that are assumed in the energy predictions that are underwritten by, supported by, the IES and the banks. So I’m not sure what your point is around that. But crystalline silicon clearly does — they have a meaningful quality factor that is being used when they do the energy prediction for that technology. What I would say, if you take a Series 7 CuRe product and you compare it from an energy profile — because, again, energy is what our customers pay for and what the value of that product would be — relative to a PERC technology, it would be advantaged to PERC, so there’d be no discount to PERC. It would also vary with where it is, because obviously our technology does not have — cure will have better bifaciality than our CuRe product; our bifaciality is lower than crystalline silicon. So if you were to go further Northeast where you get a better impact of bifaciality, then you’ll see a different outcome. If you go to the desert Southwest or to the Southeast and more hot and humid climates, you’re going to see a better outcome for our technology. And then if you compare us to TOPCon — which, again, the vast majority of anyone producing or selling any TOPCon product in the U.S. is an infringing IP, which we will stand by and completely enforce — then you’ll have a slightly different outcome. We would actually be, on average, slightly disadvantaged to TOPCon by a few pennies. So it depends. I mean, you’ve got different situations, different geographies, different terrains — a lot of different things factor into that and determine the relative competitiveness of the technology. But I would say, general rule of thumb: Series 7 CuRe is going to be advantaged against PERC and disadvantaged by pennies relative to TOPCon. As it relates to the competition and how that all plays out, you have to think through how much are you willing — first off, is the competition and the manufacturing that’s coming into the U.S. truly FEOC-free, truly unencumbered by any dependency from the Chinese, whether it’s the supply chain, whether it’s the tools and the manufacturing equipment, whether it’s the IP? A lot of our customers do their own subjective analysis and have concluded that there’s a substantial risk, still, that these entities are not FEOC-free and they don’t want to take on that risk. That puts us in a much better position, there’s no doubt about that. And that’s also why I think you’re going to find customers leaning into developing partnerships with First Solar that go longer-dated. I believe I remember reading one of the filings recently for one of the U.S. manufacturers, and I believe almost 100% of the sales that they’re generating this year is to a related party, and I understand that related party to be a Chinese counterparty. So, I mean, it tells you — just looking at that as an example — that, you know, in certain situations customers are not willing to take on that risk. And we still don’t have full clarity around FEOC yet, and I think that’s why people are being a little gun-shy. OPERATOR Our final question comes from the line of Dimple Gosai with Piper Sandler. Dimple, your line is now open. Dimple Gosai (Analyst at Piper Sandler) Thank you very much. Good evening, everyone. My question is regarding just December 4th in terms of outcomes and what you’re hearing. I mean, there’s been a lot of news recently. T1 recently filed for a waiver around cell imports. We’re hearing a lot about lobbying for exclusions, and we also know utilities are pretty price sensitive here. So, are we, in your view — is there risk to the upside or downside, just in terms of the outcome there? And then separately, just kind of talking about some of the news that we’re hearing about, there’s also news on the Swift Current lawsuit that’s been in the news. Is there anything you can speak about here? Is there any merit to that? Is there a size associated with it, and any merit, really? Thank you. Mark Whitmar (Chief Executive Officer) As it relates to the exclusions. Look, I do believe because, again, the program’s intent and motivation is to try to ensure manufacturing here, reshoring of manufacturing, true manufacturing, truly unencumbered by Chinese or adversarial countries’ dependencies. Each one of those will be determined on a circumstances basis and worked through with Commerce to say, is there true substance to this? And then, in general, the focus with Commerce is to limit the period of time which that exclusion would be provided. I don’t stay on top of it. I don’t know. My team may have better insights than I do in terms of, have any exclusions been granted at this point in time? It’s not clear to me that there have been any granted exclusions. I know there’s been some representation of statements that have been made, but I don’t believe there’s any actual exclusions that have been communicated publicly at this point in time. But that’s something that we’re going to have to stay close to and understand. I’m perfectly fine, though, competing. You know, we’ve always said, you know, U.S. manufacturing on a level playing field. First Solar is more than happy to compete on our own merits and our technology and the competitiveness of our manufacturing process and our supply chain. So if some of that does happen, then it’ll evolve and that’ll create the domestic industry that I do believe still is a strategic thread that’s important for us as a country, assuming we do it right, assuming it truly is U.S. technology, U.S. manufacturing, U.S. supply chains creating U.S. jobs and supporting American families. There’s no doubt about that. That’s absolutely critical from that standpoint. As it relates to the lawsuit, I really can’t comment much of anything around that. We actually will be filing our response here shortly per the required timeline, and I think there’ll be better clarity around the issues and the allegations that have been raised during that, as part of that lawsuit. What I will say is that we have always, and even with engagement with Swift, we’ve always said we will stand by and we will support, under the parameters of our limited liability warranty, the obligations that we have. Again, that largely is reflective of and relates to the Series 7 initial product launch, that we had indicated that there were a couple of issues that came out as part of that launch that resulted in an initial stabilization of that technology to be below expectations. And then, underneath that program we put in place, we said we would remedy those issues with customers, and we engaged even with Swift to have that conversation. I think where the challenge comes in is where people are asking for remedies that are outside the parameters of the warranty, and that’s just, you know, that’s not something that we will do, but we will be more than, you know, we’ll stand behind the technology. And we had that conversation with Swift in this case, and they chose to try to pursue a different approach where they think they could be successful. And again, you should see our response in our filing coming out here in the next several weeks. OPERATOR We have reached the end of the Q and A session. This concludes today’s call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:16
2d ago
|
First Solar (FSLR) Tops Q3 Earnings Estimates | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
First Solar (FSLR - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $5.3 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.64 per share. This compares to earnings of $4.24 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +14.22%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this largest U.S. solar company would post earnings of $2.74 per share when it actually produced earnings of $3.92, delivering a surprise of +43.07%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times. First Solar, which belongs to the Zacks Solar industry, posted revenues of $1.23 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.24%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $1.59 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates just once over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. First Solar shares have lost about 32.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.1%. What's Next for First Solar?While First Solar has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for First Solar was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $5.70 on $1.66 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $17.63 on $5.07 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Solar is currently in the bottom 25% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. One other stock from the same industry, T1 Energy Inc (TE - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on November 12. This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.12 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +85.9%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 9.5% lower over the last 30 days to the current level. T1 Energy Inc's revenues are expected to be $274.83 million, up 30.6% from the year-ago quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:26
2d ago
|
Gilead Sciences Lifts Sales Guidance on HIV Portfolio Strength | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The biopharmaceutical company said it now expects full-year product sales of $31 billion to $31.3 billion, up from $30.1 billion to $30.4 billion. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:48
2d ago
|
Gilead Sciences Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ:GILD) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company's third-quarter earnings call has been provided below. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:46
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:36
2d ago
|
Gilead Sciences (GILD) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Top Estimates | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Gilead Sciences (GILD - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $2.55 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.17 per share. This compares to earnings of $2.47 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +17.51%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this HIV and hepatitis C drugmaker would post a loss of $7.07 per share when it actually produced a loss of $6.75, delivering a surprise of +4.53%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. Gilead, which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Biomedical and Genetics industry, posted revenues of $8.3 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 6.21%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $7.77 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Gilead shares have added about 29.7% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.1%. What's Next for Gilead?While Gilead has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Gilead was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $2.05 on $8.23 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and -$0.48 on $30.76 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Medical - Biomedical and Genetics is currently in the top 40% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS - Free Report) , another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. This company is expected to post quarterly loss of $1.43 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -376.7%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenues are expected to be $188.8 million, up 59.1% from the year-ago quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:45
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:56
2d ago
|
DaVita Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
DaVita (NYSE:DVA) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. View the webcast at https://app.webinar.net/Q9G4E8oWJew SummaryDaVita Inc. reported a third quarter adjusted operating income of $561 million and adjusted earnings per share of $3.82, with full-year guidance narrowed to an adjusted operating income range of $2.175 billion to $2.25 billion. The company highlighted the successful pilot and upcoming national rollout of Expanded HD dialyzers, which promise significant improvements in patient care and mortality rates, though financial benefits are expected to materialize in the back half of 2028. Integrated Kidney Care (IKC) performed ahead of expectations, with an increase in guidance for adjusted operating income to at least $65 million for 2026, aided by a new partnership with Humana and improved savings rates. Investment in technology continues, though growth in tech spending is expected to decelerate; current investments are impacting full-year financial performance due to higher than forecasted costs. The company is actively engaged with CMS and government agencies on policy updates, with a focus on fostering innovation and addressing economic dynamics in the dialysis sector. Operational metrics showed improvement with a 1.2% year-over-year growth in treatment volume, although missed treatments were higher than expected in the third quarter. Management remains committed to exploring growth opportunities in the IKC business, focusing on healthy contracts and aligned partnerships to enhance patient outcomes and economic performance. Full TranscriptMichelle (Operator) Good evening. My name is Michelle and I will be your conference facilitator today. At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the DaVita third quarter 2026 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be a question-and-answer period. If you would like to ask a question during that time, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then the number two. Mr. Eliason, you may begin your conference. Nick Eliason (Group Vice President of Investor Relations) Thank you, and welcome to our third quarter conference call. We appreciate your continued interest in our company. I’m Nick Eliason, Group Vice President of Investor Relations and joining me today are Javier Rodriguez, our CEO, and Joel Ackerman, our CFO. Please note that during this call we may make forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All of these statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. For further details concerning these risks and uncertainties, please refer to our third quarter earnings press release and our SEC filings, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, all subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other subsequent filings that we make with the SEC. Our forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us and we do not intend to and undertake no duty to update these statements except as may be required by law. Additionally, we’d like to remind you that during this call we will discuss some non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures is included in our earnings press release furnished to the SEC and available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Javier Rodriguez. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you, Nick. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining the call today. Once again, our teammates have delivered excellent care for our patients and solid results for our shareholders. We’re seeing meaningful progress across our clinical strategy with investments in innovation translating into better patient outcomes and stronger business performance. Our maturing Integrated Kidney Care business is a prime example as it continues to deliver clinical performance for our patients while starting to demonstrate its economic potential. In the same spirit, our rollout of Expanded HD dialyzers marks an exciting new chapter in how we’re advancing kidney care today. I’ll share more on these priorities, review our third quarter financial performance, provide our outlook for the remainder of the year and briefly discuss policy. But first, as always, let’s begin with our clinical highlight. Today I will highlight our advancements in fluid management. We’re often asked about the clinical drivers behind our recent mortality improvements, and fluid overload is one of those critical areas we target. Because kidney failure impairs the body’s ability to shed fluid, managing fluid intake between treatment and safely moving excess fluid during dialysis requires constant vigilance for both patients and care teams. Left unmanaged, excess fluid places strain on the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, contributing to high blood pressure, heart failure and respiratory difficulties. By developing specialized clinical protocols combined with dedicated teammate education and proprietary digital tools, we’ve uniquely empowered our care teams to manage fluid more precisely. Through these integrated efforts, we’ve seen a 10% improvement in treatments achieving optimal fluid removal, a 5% improvement in how patients manage weight gain between treatments, and nearly five pound reduction in the average patient’s weight. These advancements are critical drivers supporting our continued mortality improvements and enhancing our patients’ daily quality of life. Around the topic of medical, I will transition now to an update on our efforts to deliver better care for our patients through clearance of middle molecules. Last quarter we highlighted recent clinical evidence for Expanded HD dialyzers, including the potential for greater than 20% mortality improvement, along with our plans to deploy this technology broadly across our network. We have completed pilots in 150 centers for more than 10,000 patients to ensure a smooth in-center deployment at scale. Based on this experience we learned, first, the feedback from patients and physicians was overwhelmingly positive. As background, approximately 75% of total patient census is clinically eligible for Expanded HD. This eligible pool excludes patients receiving dialysis at home or in an acute care setting, pediatric patients and patients with acute kidney injury. Adoption amongst those clinically eligible patients in the pilot was greater than 90%. Within that cohort, patients tell us they feel better after treatment and have more energy compared to prior therapy. One goal with Expanded HD is to enhance patients’ quality of life and it is exciting to hear early feedback to support this effort. Similarly, our physician partners have been overwhelmingly supportive. The buy-in from the medical community is critical to successful innovation and nephrologists have responded to the clinical evidence and are actively engaged to transform the standard of care. We deeply appreciate the collaboration of our physician partners in our continued efforts to innovate. Second, we are operationally ready. Our teammates, systems, and supply chain are well prepared to successfully manage this transition. Over 95% of clinical teammates nationally are now trained on Expanded HD to ensure seamless care for our patients. As a reminder, the new Expanded HD dialyzers are compatible with our existing dialysis machines. As a result, we will begin our national rollout next week and expect network transition, bringing Expanded HD to the vast majority of eligible patients in November. Finally, from a financial perspective we do not expect any material net impact on adjusted operating income for 2026 or 2027. We anticipate the positive impact of lower mortality and higher volume growth to begin in the back half of 2028 and grow over time. Most importantly, this innovation means more patients living longer, representing a key milestone in our path back to 2% or greater volume growth by 2029. Transitioning to financial performance, third quarter adjusted operating income was $561 million and adjusted earnings per share was $3.82. Joel will provide details on the moving pieces underlying those Q3 results. Taking a step back from the quarterly numbers to look at the full year, I want to highlight two trends shaping 2026 and our future performance, starting with technology. Over the past few years we’ve invested more than a billion dollars to modernize our technology platform and strengthen our capabilities across our business. These investments are delivering tangible clinical and financial benefits, contributing to improvements in mortality, revenue operations, labor productivity, IKC care management, and pharmacy costs. I’m calling this out to highlight that our IT investments in U.S. Dialysis are higher than we forecasted heading into the year, so it represents a drag on our full year financial performance. Going forward, we expect that growth in technology investment will decelerate. The second highlight is our results on Integrated Kidney Care, or IKC. We were above plan in the third quarter and we’re on track to outperform our original IKC guidance for the year. We made meaningful progress delivering on the patient impact we began talking about in 2021, both upstream in chronic kidney disease and for existing ESKD dialysis patients. Let me provide some color on the two operating levers which contribute to IKC’s financial performance. First is the medical spend under management. As we have noted in the past quarters, we have been disciplined as we seek opportunities to grow this business. We’re making progress heading into next year, including our recent announcement of a Humana partnership, which will expand upstream care to approximately 10,000 chronic kidney disease patients. Second is our savings rate, which reflects our ability to lower the total cost of care and has steadily improved year over year. This is particularly encouraging because it reflects continued gains in clinical performance as our care model matures. Our investment in technology is improving the ability of our care team to identify where and when to intervene to help our patients be healthier. Our clinical interventions are driving reductions in avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions while achieving higher rates of planned optimal dialysis transitions. These results improve patient outcomes while generating substantial shared savings for CMS and our Medicare Advantage health plan partners. This gives us growing confidence in 2026 and the long-term economics of the IKC business. We now expect IKC to deliver at least $65 million of adjusted operating income in 2026, an increase of at least $25 million over the prior guidance. This all leads to an update on our financial outlook for the remainder of the year. With one quarter remaining in the year, we are now narrowing our full year 2026 guidance ranges. We now expect adjusted operating income within a range of $2.175 billion to $2.25 billion and adjusted earnings per share within a range of $14.30 to $15.20. This reflects the increased guidance for IKC offset by higher U.S. Dialysis costs, particularly higher technology investments, as I previously noted. Before I turn it over to Joel, I want to briefly comment on two recent policy updates. First, yesterday CMS released the ESRD final rule. This confirms the permanent incorporation of phosphate binders into the dialysis bundle, which is a great outcome for patients and has been a successful cost saver for the government. Within the overall rate adjustment, there are more moving pieces than in prior years. The headline rate increase for large dialysis organizations is 3.5%, which is up 1.5% from the proposed rule. Unlike prior years, this will be subject to downward quarterly adjustments after Q1. And second, a few thoughts on the Kidney Care National Plan released by HHS last week. We share the administration’s goals around earlier intervention, slowing disease progression, improving the transplant process, expanding patient choice and improving outcomes. We also appreciate the opportunity of the government to create a framework to urge further competition in this complex ecosystem. Many of the plan will require policy development and potentially congressional action before translating into specific actions, and we look forward to working with HHS and the relevant agencies as that work progresses. I will now turn the call over to Joel to discuss our financial performance in more detail. Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Thank you, Javier. For the third quarter, adjusted operating income was $561 million, adjusted earnings per share was $3.82 and free cash flow was $276 million. Today I’ll provide further details on the quarter’s results and some thoughts on Q4 and full year guidance. Starting with US dialysis adjusted operating income was in line with our expectations. I’ll walk you through the trilogy. Starting with volume, overall treatment volume grew 1.2% over the third quarter of 2025 and treatments per normalized day increased approximately 65 basis points year over year. Patient census increases drove the year over year growth primarily as a result of improving mortality. The census gain was offset in the quarter by an uptick in missed treatments. As a reminder, the fourth quarter will have an approximately 1% headwind to treatment volume due to year over year day mix. Revenue per treatment was up approximately 1.1% versus the third quarter of last year and roughly flat sequentially. The year on year growth is the result of normal rate increases offset by lower commercial mix and lower phosphate binder reimbursement as expected through three quarters of the year. The impact on our exchange census from the expiration of enhanced premium tax credits continues to play out as expected. Patient care costs per treatment were up 2.4% in Q3 compared to last year. Phosphate binder costs declined year over year as expected and partially offset the typical growth in labor expenses. Medical supply costs and professional liability expenses were higher than anticipated in the quarter. We expect these costs to revert to typical levels over time. US dialysis G&A costs were up less than 2% versus Q3 last year, excluding non-GAAP adjusted cyber expenses in 2025. Technology spend continued to grow at more than 20% year over year in the quarter, but the non-tech component of G&A was lower in the quarter compared to last year as a result of our ongoing cost control efforts and expense timing. Turning now to IKC, as Javier noted, the business is performing ahead of our expectations. The outperformance this year is largely driven by a higher shared savings rate in our CKCC business, which is the Medicare Fee for Service demonstration project, as well as the value-based care contracts we have with Medicare Advantage insurers. This is partially offset by higher operating expenses due to higher physician payouts from our shared savings and the launch of a new CKD program with Humana. We now expect this year’s IKC adjusted operating income to be at least $65 million, representing a $45 million improvement over last year and a $25 million improvement over our prior guidance. Turning to international, third quarter adjusted operating income was $46 million, a $20 million increase year over year. This performance is largely the result of growth and improved performance in our Latin America businesses. These results exclude a charge related to our operations in China which is not included in our adjusted operating income. The full year continues to track in line with our expectations for approximately $135 million of international adjusted operating income. Transitioning to capital allocation, we repurchased approximately 600,000 shares in Q3 and we repurchased an additional 500,000 shares since the end of the quarter, including shares from Berkshire Hathaway. As a reminder, we repurchase shares from Berkshire each quarter as needed to bring their ownership back to 45% pursuant to our repurchase agreement. We finished September with a leverage ratio of 3.38 times consolidated EBITDA, about flat to last quarter. Debt expense in the quarter was $150 million. In light of rising interest rates, I will remind you that we maintain three-year interest rate caps on approximately 80% of our floating rate debt for full year 2026. As Javier noted, we are narrowing our guidance ranges for adjusted operating income and adjusted earnings per share. Our new range for adjusted OI is $2.175 billion to $2.25 billion and our new range for EPS is $14.3 to $15.2. We anticipate free cash flow between $1 billion and $1.25 billion. That concludes my prepared remarks for today. Operator, please open the call for Q&A. Michelle (Operator) Thank you, Joel. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press STAR and then the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press STAR then the number two. Our first caller is AJ Rice with UBS. Your line is open, sir. AJ Rice (Analyst) Thanks. Hi everybody. I appreciate the comments on the ESRD rule finalized over the last 24 hours. I know the industry had sort of felt like the rate in the original proposal for phosphate binders seemed adequate, but the underlying rate for the treatments ex-TDAPA was challenging. With the adjustments made, is there an ability to comment? One of the tricky things is how I know you guys had said the phosphate binder reimbursement would drop because ASPs were dropping in the relevant drugs. Can you just comment on whether the drop in what they’ve included was consistent with what you’re thinking and how adequate is the move up in the rest of the rate? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, AJ, thanks for the question. So as you noted, it’s been 24 hours and we’re still unpacking the calculations. I’ll start with the picture which is our estimate right now, and I’ll emphasize that it’s an estimate, is that the net impact for us for the full year 27 will be 1.5 to 2%. As a reminder, a 1% change in Medicare for US is worth about $30 million a year. This is an improvement over the prior rule by somewhere north of 50 bps. And the important thing to realize is the rule works differently now than it has in the past. Because of the change in the way that the TDAPA add-on payments are handled, they’re now recalculated every quarter rather than recalculated once a year. So the published number is really only the number for Q1. And you really have to break it into two components. There’s everything other than the TDAPA component, which is fixed for the year. And if you look at what that is for the LDOs, it’s 40 basis points and that’ll be constant for the year. And then the TDAPA component, which for the LDOs is 3.1%, that only stands for the first quarter. And we expect that number to come down significantly in Q2 and stay down and potentially further decline over the course of the year. So we’ve got that 40 basis points locked in. That 3.5% will come down significantly and the net impact over the course of the year we think is 1.5 to 2%, stronger in Q1, a little bit weaker over the rest of the year. AJ Rice (Analyst) Okay. Okay, thanks for that and maybe my follow up. Interested about your comments on the IKC? It sounds like, it sounds like you feel it’s solidly profitable now you can start to grow it. Obviously you’ve got the Humana transaction. It seems like to me there’s probably a fair amount of business up for grabs. If you wanted to lean into growth in that area. Can you maybe talk about now that you feel like you’re at a consistent level of profitability, how much you might think about adding to that business? Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Sure. Let me take that one. AJ, this is Javier. We are in agreement with you. Our confidence and our capabilities both in the clinical and actuarial has now reached a point that we want to pursue more business. But as we emphasize, what you want is healthy contracts. You want your physician partners to be heavily involved. Our model of care is now scalable and you need integrated tech, which we now have. So we’ve got a lot of the pieces to the tool. And now it’s about getting contracts and physicians that are aligned to make sure that we deliver on the care that both avoids hospitalizations and readmissions and brings down the cost. AJ Rice (Analyst) Okay. Okay, thanks. Michelle (Operator) Thank you. Our next caller is Andrew Mock with Barclays. Your line is open, sir. Andrew Mock (Analyst) Hi, good afternoon. Leaving the full year treatment guide alone implies treatments per normalized day would be up more than 1% in Q4 and an acceleration from the first three quarters. Is that the right way to think about the progression? And are you comfortable with that given the uptick in missed treatments you called out? Thanks. Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah. So Andrew, first your math is about right. It would involve an uptick in treatments per normalized day in Q4. I would expect that to come from two things. One is missed treatment rate reverting to a normal year over year pattern. What we saw in Q3 was missed treatment rates about 20 basis points higher than expected and higher than last year. And what we’re assuming for Q4 is that it reverts to a normal pattern. We’re assuming it’ll be consistent with Q4 of last year. So that’s one thing. The second component driving it would be census. Census growth grew in Q3 anticipated and that census growth over the course of the quarter drives higher treatment growth per normalized day in Q4 rather than Q3. So those two things together would drive the uptick in Q4. Andrew Mock (Analyst) Great. And can you update us on the ACA exchange headwind in the quarter and comment on where commercial mix is tracking relative to the about 10.7 I think you were expecting in the back half? Thanks. Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yes, mix is down a little bit relative to the first half of the year. Very much in line with our expectations and we think we’re on track for that $40 million year over year headwind for 26. Andrew Mock (Analyst) Great. And finally, if I could squeeze one more in, wanted to follow up on your comments around HHS’s Kidney Care Plan released last week. What were your initial impressions and which elements of the plan do you think translate into policy? Thanks. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, thanks Andrew. As we said in our opening comment, we have a lot of things that we like about the plan and we are aligned totally and we share the goals of the administration of fostering innovation, investing in early detection and prevention and increasing access to transplant. When the plan came out, I immediately reached out to the administration and told them we want to be right there at the table and want to be part of the solution. And on each one of those, of course you can go into the sub component. As for the part that was a bit frustrating, it’s how dialysis was portrayed in the rule. The fact is we offer world-class service and we are great economic value and this is confirmed as I travel the world and other countries really want our expertise to enter. That said, there were some positive things around what they said within dialysis, which is they want to solve for innovation in the bundle which we of course want as well. And they want to reduce regulatory burden, which we would welcome. The part that’s a little, let’s say not fleshed out enough and we need to solve for is the economic ecosystem. 90% of patients are covered by the government insurance with roughly 1% Medicare increase for the past decade. And so there’s an assumption in there that the cross subsidy by the private insurance and the 1 in 10 is accepted by the model. And so one of the main things that they want to do is attract new capital. And in order to attract new capital we have to solve for this dynamic. And one of the things is the government will have to pay more. If I was going to continue a little while, I got a little momentum because you hopefully can feel my passion on it is that there’s an under appreciation for the benefit of scale and expertise that as I look at our body of work over the last couple of decades we have developed and adhered to world-class protocols and best demonstrated practices. We have a dramatic reduction in mortality of roughly 25% if you measure it from the year 2000. When there’s an emergency or a disaster response, we are there. When you look at sophisticated tech, we have it. When you look at access to rural communities, 92% of patients in rural communities are within 10 miles of our centers. And by the way, you need a counterweight to big pharma and big insurance or else costs would go up a whole bunch. So in summary, I really took a little to heart that we are part of the solution, not the problem. We welcome more competition, but I want to be clear, the limited competition is not due to how we operate but rather how hard it is to take care of this vulnerable population with high needs at 90% government mix. And so you hopefully see the one part that got me going, but the rest of the plan I’m totally behind. Andrew Mock (Analyst) Appreciate all the color. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you Andrew. Michelle (Operator) Thank you. And once again, if you would like to ask a question, you may press Star One. Our next caller is Pito Chickering with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open, sir. Pito Chickering (Analyst) Hey, good afternoon guys. Thanks for taking the questions. As you think about 2027, can you give us the known puts and takes as we think about modeling next year including the treatment growth that you’re seeing with the acceleration of the census in the third quarter and thoughts about treatment next year with what you learned about HCS, then the tailwinds from lower IT investments and any additional IKC tailwinds that we should be thinking about as you guys scale up? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Sure, I’ll take that one Peto, it’s early to give full guidance on 2027. That said, there’s certainly a few things that we can help with. On the volume side, I would say we expect volume growth in 2027 to be higher than volume growth in 2026. On RPT, we expect a headwind from commercial mix with ACA being the big component of that. And then on the cost side, I’d really call out pharmaceutical costs, which we think will come down in 2027. Binders being the biggest component of that, but not the only component of it. You mentioned it, IT spend will not come down next year. Our expectation is it will decelerate. So the 20 plus percent growth that we’ve been absorbing for the last three or four years, we think we can get down from that. But I would expect it will continue to grow. So I’d say that’s the known stuff for next year. Pito Chickering (Analyst) Okay, great. And then on the HD dialyzer I think you said that all the centers will be doing it by November and expected to see a signal in mortality in the back half of ’28. But I’m curious, for the 10,000 patients that you’ve been treating so far, have you seen any indication of lower missed treatments that could impact the near term treatments? And how does this impact people on home hemo? Did they sort of come back in the center if people are having better results? Thank you. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you. And hopefully you hear the excitement in our tone in our physicians and our patients and our caregivers. This is one of the most excitement I’ve ever seen in the community. And the short answer to your question is it’s too soon to tell. This takes a while. As you can see from the studies in mortality that it takes a while to have the impact on the inflammatory side. As it relates to people switching modalities, I doubt that that will be the case. People make modalities on a lot of other matters. And if you look at PD as a modality, it already is quite good at clearing middle molecules as an example. And so I think it will be just one other thing to consider, but I doubt that there will be shifts in modality selection. Pito Chickering (Analyst) Great. And the last question, because I’m getting asked this a lot, I mean again it’s back in 2027. I know that it’s way too soon for, for guidance here, but is there any commentary around just do you think that your standard growth rates that you’ve been having the last few years in business can continue next year with the headwinds and tailwinds, plus the IKC on top of that. Is that the way you’re thinking about it? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) I think you’re right, Peto. It is too early to answer that question. Look, as we said, we think we get a better volume tailwind next year than we’ve had this year on U.S. Dialysis margins. I think we called out the headwinds, tailwinds. Headwind on RPT, a tailwind on cost. How those shake out, we’ll know more in February and then I don’t think we’ve really got much to say on either International or IKC yet. Pito Chickering (Analyst) Great. Thanks so much, guys. Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Thank you. Michelle (Operator) Thank you. Thank you. Our next caller is Kevin Fischbeck with Bank of America. Kevin Fischbeck (Analyst) Great, thanks. Can you talk a little bit about the benefit to volumes that you saw from Fresenius closing sites? I wasn’t sure if there was supposed to be any kind of improvement in Q3 versus Q2 from that kind of normalizing. What did you see there? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, no, Kevin, that played out pretty much in Q1. So no change from Q2 to Q3 from that dynamic. Kevin Fischbeck (Analyst) Okay. And how do we think about the profitability? I know it’s a 2028 and beyond issue, but of the improvement in mortality from the new dialyzer, I think there’s some question about this, just, you know, kind of extending the life on dialysis. And that’s more of a Medicare, you know, as a percentage of revenue, would that be as profitable? Should we be thinking about it as if it added 1% to treatments, if it had 1% to revenue and 1% to OI, or is the growth algorithm different than that from improved mortality? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, so we’re still waiting for better data on this. The natural thing would be to think that just the older patients or patients are adding on a year or two and you go from an average of five or six years to six or seven. And those are all Medicare patients. The early results are that is not the pure dynamic, that there are younger patients earlier in their journey whose lives are being extended. So it’s not purely an addition of Medicare treatments. How that shakes out, whether it’s the same mix of 10 or 11% commercial as we see overall or not? Too early to tell. But I don’t think we’re ready to conclude it’s 100% additional Medicare treatments as a result of this improved mortality. Kevin Fischbeck (Analyst) Okay, and then last question here. Going back to that release from CMS a week or so ago, I feel like one of the things that they focused on was the AKF exposure. Can you just remind us where that is for you, how you’re benefiting from that relationship? Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Sure. CareWell Premium Assistance, for those of you that have not been keeping up, was discussed very heavily if you go back maybe eight or so years. But we haven’t discussed it for a while, so it’s probably worth refreshing the topic. So it’s basically a system that’s been in place for many decades that enables patients, many who can no longer work full time due to kidney failure, to maintain continuity of health coverage. One of the things that’s not known is that the vast majority of patients receiving CPA use the grants to support government and supplemental coverage. And so that’s probably assumed that for commercial. But the significant majority of commercial patients actually don’t use CPA. And for those that use it, most of them use it to retain coverage that they had before their kidney failure. So while there are many reasons to keep your private insurance, the most common is to retain it for family coverage and because there is a three times more likely odds of getting a transplant if you have commercial insurance. So I think we can all agree that those are worthy reasons to keep your insurance. Again, just as a contextual thing, the grants are administered by the American Kidney Fund, otherwise referred to as AKF. And they have been under some major heavy examination through investigations, inspections, rulemaking and legislative scrutiny. And all have concluded that the grants benefit a vulnerable population and that the program follows the rules. And so now it’s been sort of pointed out in the plan as something to look at. We of course welcome and we will transparently go through the process again. But one of the things that is interesting about the dynamic is that the irony that if that program is somehow or other diluted, it would actually make more patients be paid by the government. So that 1 in 10 commercial would go down. And the other thing that would happen is that it would attract less capital. And so ironically, this would be contra their intent to bring more competition to the marketplace. That said, I think your question was around sizing it and what I would just say is that in looking at it and we disclosed the numbers roughly eight years ago, the numbers have stayed completely flat. So that range still applies today. Kevin Fischbeck (Analyst) All right, great. That’s helpful. Thank you. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Thank you. Michelle (Operator) Our next caller comes from Ryan Langston with TD Cowen. Your line is open, sir. Ryan Langston (Analyst) Great, thank you. On clinic capacity utilization, I think that’s been kind of steady for a few years, but still kind of well below pre-COVID levels. Do some of the initiatives you’re working on like technology, RPT and rolling out HD kind of work themselves through at some point, does pressing on this lever become more of a higher priority? And what types of things can you do to maybe increase that utilization? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, so look, we absolutely like to get capacity utilization up. The best way to do it is to grow our census count. We are doing that. As I mentioned before, our census count is up about 1%, a little bit more than 1% year over year. And we plan on continuing that. We do not have any plans right now to close clinics. That would be the other thing to do. So we’d like to get it up with more volume. Ryan Langston (Analyst) Got it. And then depreciation expense has been trending down sequentially for a few quarters here. Is this sort of a good run rate for us to kind of jump off of or might we expect that to come down a little bit in the fourth quarter? Thanks. Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) I think it’s been coming down for many years now. I think we’re getting to the point where we’re probably not going to see a lot of continued decline. So I think we’re in a reasonable spot where we are now. Nick Eliason (Group Vice President of Investor Relations) Michelle, can we go to the next question? Michelle (Operator) Yes. Justin Lake with Wolfe Research, your line is open. Justin, we can’t hear you. William Westerfield (Analyst) Hello? Sorry, I couldn’t hear you. Thank you for taking the question. This is William Westerfield, asking for Justin Lake. We just want to circle back to the final ESRD rates that came out last night, and LDOs were up 3.5% with much of that coming from phosphate binders and DefenCath moving into the bundle. Could you just go through for us how you view that 3.1% increase in TDAPA payments across those two drugs? More specifically, how does the $12-plus binders number compare to your current binder revenue per treatment for Medicare patients, and then for DefenCath, can you talk about how you will think about that reimbursement development across 2027 and when you provide guidance for next year? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, Will, thanks for the question. So I treat the two very differently: binders, very much in line with our expectation. Not much growth, not much of that 3.1% growth we think is from. We don’t have full visibility on the baseline for 2026 because it incorporates us as well as others. But we don’t think that’s really the big story in the 3.1% growth. We think it’s largely about DefenCath. And the important thing to realize on that is, because it’s a TDAPA add-on payment, it will get recalculated every quarter based on updated volume and updated ASP. And our current expectation is that number will drop significantly from Q1 to Q2 and stay low or continue to decline through the back half of 2027. William Westerfield (Analyst) Okay, and then on top of that, is there something that you’re tracking to understand the utilization and how it might develop across the industry here in the second half in ’27 that could help investors get ahead of the potential changes in quarterly reimbursement for ’27? For instance, can we track trends? Joel Ackerman (Chief Financial Officer) I think the short answer is no. We don’t have a lot of visibility into what’s happening with the industry on that through the back half of 2026. William Westerfield (Analyst) Okay, thank you. Michelle (Operator) Thank you. And at this time I’m showing no further questions. Speakers, I’ll turn the call back over to you for any closing remarks. Javier Rodriguez (Chief Executive Officer) Okay. Thank you, Michelle, and thank you all for joining the call. To wrap up, let me give some perspectives on our year so far. First, our business is resilient in the face of pressure both from RPT due to ACA declines and from treatment volumes growing below our historical norm. Second is investment in innovation. We have heavily invested to modernize our technology infrastructure and we’re also in a full swing on the rollout of new dialyzers that promise to deliver step change in care with longer and higher quality of life for our patients. Putting all this together, we’re delivering on our financial commitments with adjusted OI growth in the top half of our long term guidance and we’re working hard to finish the year strongly. It’s unusual to say at this time of year, but we won’t talk until a little while. Have a great holiday season and we’ll speak soon. Be well. Michelle (Operator) Thank you. This concludes today’s conference call. You may go ahead and disconnect at this time and please have a good rest of your day. Thank you. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:45
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:36
2d ago
|
DaVita HealthCare (DVA) Beats Q3 Earnings and Revenue Estimates | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
DaVita HealthCare (DVA - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $3.82 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.78 per share. This compares to earnings of $2.51 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of +1.06%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this kidney dialysis provider would post earnings of $4.01 per share when it actually produced earnings of $4.02, delivering a surprise of +0.25%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates four times. DaVita HealthCare, which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Outpatient and Home Healthcare industry, posted revenues of $3.58 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 1.34%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $3.42 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates four times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. DaVita HealthCare shares have added about 61.9% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.1%. What's Next for DaVita HealthCare?While DaVita HealthCare has outperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for DaVita HealthCare was mixed. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to perform in line with the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $4.72 on $3.69 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $14.57 on $14.28 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Medical - Outpatient and Home Healthcare is currently in the bottom 38% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. One other stock from the same industry, Option Care (OPCH - Free Report) , is yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on November 4. This infusion and home care services company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.48 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +6.7%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. Option Care's revenues are expected to be $1.47 billion, up 2.4% from the year-ago quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:44
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:30
2d ago
|
Could $1,000 Invested in Palantir Turn Into $100,000? | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Palantir (PLTR -0.20%) went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. A $1,000 investment at its earliest trading price of $10 would be worth about $19,400 today. That's an impressive six-year gain, but could it eventually turn that investment into $100,000?How fast is Palantir growing? Palantir operates two data-gathering platforms: Gotham for government clients, and Foundry for commercial clients. These platforms create digital twins of a client's entire organization by collecting data from their databases, supply chain reports, sensors, internal documents, emails, financial records, social media accounts, and other disparate sources. Image source: Getty Images. Palantir then uses its data model, Ontology, to unify that fragmented data into an easy-to-query stream of information for non-technical users. Its clients can connect that data to third-party software and large language models (including OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude) via its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) to make faster data-driven decisions. Its top customers include major defense and intelligence agencies, as well as commercial giants like Walmart, Amazon, and ExxonMobil. From 2021 to 2025, Palantir's revenue grew at a 31% CAGR. It also turned profitable in 2023 and grew its EPS at a 165% CAGR over the following two years. The intensifying geopolitical conflicts drove the U.S. government to award more contracts to Palantir, and the growth of the AI market tethered more commercial customers (especially in the U.S.) to its platform. From 2025 to 2028, analysts expect Palantir's revenue and EPS to grow at CAGRs of 59% and 70%, respectively. That growth should be fueled by the expansion of the enterprise AI market, new defense modernization contracts, and the monetization of AIP with subscription modules. However, its stock isn't cheap at 91 times next year's earnings. PLTR Palantir Technologies$196.42-$0.39 (-0.20%) NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/29/26 Palantir's near-term future looks bright, but it probably can't maintain those breakneck growth rates. If it matches analysts' estimates through 2028 and continues to grow its EPS at an impressive 30% CAGR over the following 13 years, its EPS would reach $94.19 by 2041. At 50 times forward earnings, its stock would be trading at $4,710 in 2040. That would be more than 24 times its current price of $194 per share and turn $19,400 today (from a $1,000 investment in its direct listing) into about $471,400 over the next 14 years. It would also turn a fresh $1,000 investment into more than $24,000. We should take those rosy estimates with a grain of salt, but they suggest it has significant upside potential. Leo Sun has positions in Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Palantir Technologies, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:43
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:06
2d ago
|
Pinterest Announces Third Quarter 2026 Results, Delivers 12% Revenue Growth and Record Users | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Pinterest, Inc. (NYSE: PINS) today announced financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2026.Revenue was $1,174 million, growing 12% year over year on a reported and constant currency basis. Global Monthly Active Users ("MAUs") increased 10% year over year to 661 million. GAAP net income was $22 million and Adjusted EBITDA was $339 million. Net cash provided by operating activities was $316 million and free cash flow was $300 million. "Pinterest reached an all-time high of 661 million monthly active users in Q3, with revenue growing 12% year over year,” said Bill Ready, CEO of Pinterest. “Our differentiated AI-driven visual search and shopping experiences are making Pinterest increasingly valuable for users and advertisers alike. We are focused on sharpening our execution, scaling our performance advertising solutions, and building an ecosystem that captures high-intent discovery and converts it into durable, long-term growth." Q3 2026 Financial Highlights The following table summarizes our consolidated financial results (in thousands, except percentages, unaudited): Three Months Ended September 30, % Change 2026 2025 Revenue $ 1,173,929 $ 1,049,205 12 % Constant currency % growth(1)(2) 12 % Net income $ 21,515 $ 92,108 (77 )% Net income margin 2 % 9 % Non-GAAP net income(2) $ 270,285 $ 262,925 3 % Adjusted EBITDA(2) $ 339,207 $ 306,051 11 % Adjusted EBITDA margin(2) 29 % 29 % Net cash provided by operating activities $ 315,733 $ 321,652 (2 )% Free cash flow(2) $ 300,268 $ 318,421 (6 )% Q3 2026 Other Highlights The following table sets forth our revenue, MAUs and average revenue per user (ARPU) based on the geographic location of our users (in millions, except ARPU and percentages, unaudited): Three Months Ended September 30, % Change 2026 2025 Revenue - Global $ 1,174 $ 1,049 12 % Revenue - U.S. and Canada $ 894 $ 786 14 % Revenue - Europe $ 193 $ 193 — % Revenue - Rest of World $ 87 $ 70 24 % MAUs - Global 661 600 10 % MAUs - U.S. and Canada 107 103 4 % MAUs - Europe 161 150 7 % MAUs - Rest of World 394 347 13 % ARPU - Global $ 1.80 $ 1.78 1 % ARPU - U.S. and Canada $ 8.38 $ 7.64 10 % ARPU - Europe $ 1.21 $ 1.31 (7 )% ARPU - Rest of World $ 0.23 $ 0.21 9 % Guidance For Q4 2026, we expect revenue to be in the range of $1,425 million to $1,475 million, representing 8% - 12% growth year over year, which assumes a modest headwind from foreign exchange based on current spot rates. We expect Q4 2026 Adjusted EBITDA* to be in the range of $538 million to $588 million. We intend to provide further details on our outlook during the conference call. Webcast and conference call information A live audio webcast of our third quarter 2026 earnings release call will be available at investor.pinterestinc.com. The call begins today at 2:30 PM (PT) / 5:30 PM (ET). This press release, including the reconciliations of certain non-GAAP measures to their nearest comparable GAAP measures and slide presentation are also available. A recording of the webcast will be available at investor.pinterestinc.com for 90 days. We have used, and intend to continue to use, our investor relations website at investor.pinterestinc.com as a means of disclosing material nonpublic information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Forward-looking statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, about us and our industry that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and are often characterized by the use of words such as "believes," "estimates," "expect," "may," "will," "can," "could," "would", "might," "continue," "intends," "plans," "forecasts," "strategy," "projections," "goals," "trends," "projects," "targets," "anticipates," "potential," "looking ahead," "long-term" or and similar expressions, or by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from historical results or any future results, performance or achievements expressed, suggested or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, statements about: general economic uncertainty in global markets and a worsening of global economic conditions or low levels of economic growth, including inflation, tariffs and related retaliatory actions and other trade protection measures, stress in the banking industry, foreign exchange fluctuations and supply-chain issues; the effect of general economic and political conditions; our financial performance, including revenue, cost and expenses and cash flows; our ability to attract, retain and recover users and maintain and grow their level of engagement; our ability to provide content that is useful and relevant to users' personal taste and interests; our ability to develop successful new products or improve existing ones; our ability to maintain and enhance our brand and reputation; potential harm caused by compromises in security, including our cybersecurity protections and resources and costs required to prevent, detect and remediate potential security breaches; potential harm caused by changes in online application stores or internet search engines' methodologies, particularly search engine optimization methodologies and policies; discontinuation, disruptions or outages in third-party single sign-on access; our ability to compete effectively in our industry; our ability to scale our business, including our monetization efforts; our ability to attract, retain, and manage advertisers, advertising agencies, and vertical concentration risk, and scale our revenue model; our ability to attract and retain creators and publishers that create relevant and engaging content; our ability to develop effective products and tools for advertisers, including measurement tools; our ability to expand and monetize our platform internationally; our ability to effectively manage the growth of our business; our ability to continue to use and develop artificial intelligence ("AI") as well as managing the challenges and risks posed by AI; our ability to successfully manage our flexible work model with a more distributed workforce; our ability to sustain profitability; decisions that reduce short-term revenue or profitability or do not produce the long-term benefits we expect; fluctuations in our operating results; our ability to raise additional capital on favorable terms or at all; our ability to realize anticipated benefits from mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic partnerships and other investments; our ability to protect our intellectual property; our ability to receive, process, store, use and share data, and compliance with laws and regulations related to data privacy and content; current or potential litigation and regulatory actions involving us; our ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our business, and potential harm to our business as a result of those laws and regulations; real or perceived inaccuracies in metrics related to our business; disruption of, degradation in or interference with our use of Amazon Web Services and our infrastructure; our ability to achieve the expected benefits of our restructuring plan; and our ability to attract and retain personnel. These and other potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted are more fully detailed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2026, which is available on our investor relations website at investor.pinterestinc.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. All information provided in this release and in the earnings materials is as of October 29, 2026. Undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements in this press release, which are based on information available to us on the date hereof. We undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law. About non-GAAP financial measures To supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures: Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, non-GAAP costs and expenses (including non-GAAP cost of revenue, research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative), non-GAAP income (loss) from operations, non-GAAP net income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) per share, constant currency revenue, non-GAAP operating expenses and free cash flow. The presentation of these financial measures is not intended to be considered in isolation, as a substitute for or superior to the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. Investors are cautioned that there are material limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures as an analytical tool. In addition, these measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparative purposes. We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding GAAP amounts excluded from these non-GAAP financial measures. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude depreciation and amortization expense, share-based compensation expense, payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation, interest income (expense), net, other income (expense), net, provision for (benefit from) income taxes and certain other non-recurring or non-cash items impacting net income (loss) that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing business performance. Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by revenue. Non-GAAP costs and expenses (including non-GAAP cost of revenue, research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative) and non-GAAP net income (loss) exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets, share-based compensation expense, payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation and restructuring charges. In addition to these exclusions, we also subtract an assumed provision for income taxes to calculate non-GAAP net income. We calculate the non-GAAP income tax provision using a fixed long-term projected tax rate in order to provide better consistency across reporting periods. The fixed long-term projected tax rate uses a financial projection that excludes the direct impact of our non-GAAP adjustments and eliminates the effects of items that can vary in size and frequency. For 2025 and 2026, we used a long-term projected tax rate of 20%, which reflects currently available information, as well as other factors and assumptions. The non-GAAP tax rate could be subject to change for a variety of reasons, including significant changes in the geographic earnings mix or changes in tax laws and regulations. We re-evaluate this long-term rate on an annual basis or if any significant events that may materially affect this long-term rate occur. Non-GAAP income (loss) from operations is calculated by subtracting non-GAAP costs and expenses from revenue. Non-GAAP net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing non-GAAP net income (loss) by diluted weighted-average shares outstanding. We calculate constant currency revenue by translating our current period revenue using the corresponding prior period’s monthly exchange rates for currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment. Free cash flow is not intended to represent our residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our operating results and for financial and operational decision-making purposes. We believe these measures help identify underlying trends in our business that could otherwise be masked by the effect of the income and expenses they exclude. We also believe these measures provide useful information about our operating results, enhance the overall understanding of our past performance and future prospects and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics we use for financial and operational decision-making. We present these non-GAAP measures to assist potential investors in seeing our operating results through the eyes of management and because we believe these measures provide an additional tool for investors to use in comparing our operating results over multiple periods with other companies in our industry. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures rather than the nearest GAAP equivalents. For example, Adjusted EBITDA excludes: (i) certain recurring, non-cash charges such as depreciation of fixed assets and amortization of acquired intangible assets, although these assets may have to be replaced in the future, and (ii) share-based compensation expense and payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation, which have been, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, significant recurring expenses and an important part of our compensation strategy. In addition, constant currency revenue excludes the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which have an actual effect on our operating results, and free cash flow does not reflect our future contractual commitments arising from purchases of property and equipment. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, please see the tables under "―Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial results" included at the end of this release. Limitation of key metrics and other data The numbers for our key metrics, which include our MAUs and ARPU, are calculated using internal company data based on the activity of user accounts. We define an MAU as an authenticated Pinterest user who visits our website, opens our mobile application or interacts with Pinterest through one of our browser or site extensions, such as the Save button, at least once during the 30-day period ending on the date of measurement. The number of MAUs does not include Shuffles users unless they would otherwise qualify as MAUs. Unless otherwise indicated, we present MAUs based on the number of MAUs measured on the last day of the current period. We measure monetization of our platform through our ARPU metric. We define ARPU as our total revenue in a given geography during a period divided by the average of the number of MAUs in that geography during the period. We calculate average MAUs based on the average of the number of MAUs measured on the last day of the current period and the last day prior to the beginning of the current period. We calculate ARPU by geography based on our estimate of the geography in which revenue-generating activities occur. We use these metrics to assess the growth and health of the overall business and believe that MAUs and ARPU best reflect our ability to attract, retain, engage and monetize our users, and thereby drive revenue. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates of our user base for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring usage of our products across large online and mobile populations around the world. In addition, we are continually seeking to improve our estimates of our user base, and such estimates may change due to improvements or changes in technology or our methodology. PINTEREST, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except par value) (Unaudited) September 30, December 31, 2026 2025 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 654,344 $ 969,342 Marketable securities 815,677 1,497,811 Accounts receivable, net 916,757 997,849 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 145,360 90,735 Total current assets 2,532,138 3,555,737 Property and equipment, net 97,134 66,451 Operating lease right-of-use assets 142,351 150,399 Intangible assets, net 80,533 6,083 Goodwill 475,290 100,227 Deferred tax assets 1,603,484 1,592,153 Other assets 19,938 21,082 Total assets $ 4,950,868 $ 5,492,132 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 153,793 $ 129,810 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 437,677 335,663 Total current liabilities 591,470 465,473 Convertible notes, net (1) 982,091 — Operating lease liabilities 214,242 220,581 Other liabilities 58,742 60,840 Total liabilities 1,846,545 746,894 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ equity: Class A common stock, $0.00001 par value, 6,666,667 shares authorized, 499,381 and 584,866 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively; Class B common stock, $0.00001 par value, 1,333,333 shares authorized, 73,263 and 79,680 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively 6 7 Additional paid-in capital 3,077,648 4,612,205 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (3,283 ) 4,333 Retained earnings 29,952 128,693 Total stockholders’ equity 3,104,323 4,745,238 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,950,868 $ 5,492,132 PINTEREST, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Revenue $ 1,173,929 $ 1,049,205 $ 3,361,097 $ 2,902,420 Costs and expenses: Cost of revenue 261,585 212,325 757,491 614,604 Research and development 428,079 371,253 1,259,878 1,062,542 Sales and marketing 336,997 296,679 1,029,121 863,674 General and administrative 112,823 110,432 354,220 342,891 Restructuring 4,107 — 65,539 — Total costs and expenses 1,143,591 990,689 3,466,249 2,883,711 Income (loss) from operations 30,338 58,516 (105,152 ) 18,709 Interest income (expense), net 6,022 28,536 31,142 83,851 Other income (expense), net (1,232 ) 144 (3,521 ) 15,623 Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes 35,128 87,196 (77,531 ) 118,183 Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 13,613 (4,912 ) 21,210 (21,602 ) Net income (loss) $ 21,515 $ 92,108 $ (98,741 ) $ 139,785 Net income (loss) per share: Basic $ 0.04 $ 0.14 $ (0.17 ) $ 0.21 Diluted $ 0.04 $ 0.13 $ (0.17 ) $ 0.20 Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share: Basic 567,154 677,819 588,708 677,069 Diluted 582,652 694,532 588,708 691,247 PINTEREST, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Operating activities Net income (loss) $ 21,515 $ 92,108 $ (98,741 ) $ 139,785 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 7,952 7,205 28,563 19,143 Share-based compensation 291,694 235,136 847,657 649,796 Deferred income taxes 11,661 (8,279 ) 10,293 (36,278 ) Non-cash charitable contributions — — 12,198 13,495 Net amortization of investment premium and discount (2,533 ) (4,123 ) (7,961 ) (13,636 ) Other 5,615 (6,447 ) 5,045 10,445 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 15,119 (40,724 ) 110,123 94,573 Prepaid expenses and other assets (26,734 ) 17,883 (54,480 ) (4,970 ) Operating lease right-of-use assets 7,958 7,575 27,688 21,820 Accounts payable 10,556 (1,141 ) 2,123 7,611 Accrued expenses and other liabilities (18,136 ) 31,793 84,281 17,508 Operating lease liabilities (8,934 ) (9,334 ) (30,148 ) (26,241 ) Net cash provided by operating activities 315,733 321,652 936,641 893,051 Investing activities Purchases of property and equipment (15,465 ) (3,231 ) (54,758 ) (21,530 ) Purchases of marketable securities (252,713 ) (356,135 ) (691,521 ) (1,234,446 ) Sales of marketable securities 1,744 9,758 438,355 22,648 Maturities of marketable securities 285,925 255,521 933,139 1,065,121 Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired, and intangible assets (2,250 ) — (449,204 ) — Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 17,241 (94,087 ) 176,011 (168,207 ) Financing activities Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net — — — 8,053 Repurchases of Class A common stock — (197,387 ) (2,024,886 ) (425,013 ) Shares repurchased for tax withholdings on release of restricted stock units and restricted stock awards (100,681 ) (114,792 ) (281,213 ) (314,260 ) Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance costs (1) — — 979,894 — Purchase of capped calls related to convertible notes — — (99,187 ) — Other financing activities (375 ) — (2,265 ) — Net cash used in financing activities (101,056 ) (312,179 ) (1,427,657 ) (731,220 ) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (52 ) 77 (2 ) 2,355 Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 231,866 (84,537 ) (315,007 ) (4,021 ) Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 428,489 1,221,737 975,362 1,141,221 Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 660,355 $ 1,137,200 $ 660,355 $ 1,137,200 PINTEREST, INC. RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL RESULTS (In thousands) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 Share-based compensation by function: (1) Cost of revenue $ 7,574 $ 5,173 Research and development 191,114 152,907 Sales and marketing 48,925 40,324 General and administrative 40,636 36,732 Total share-based compensation $ 288,249 $ 235,136 Payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation by function: Cost of revenue $ 137 $ 96 Research and development 3,235 3,073 Sales and marketing 1,485 1,306 General and administrative 761 719 Total payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation $ 5,618 $ 5,194 Amortization of acquired intangible assets by function: Cost of revenue $ 3,680 $ 798 Sales and marketing 916 135 General and administrative 158 197 Total amortization of acquired intangible assets $ 4,754 $ 1,130 Reconciliation of total costs and expenses to non-GAAP costs and expenses: Total costs and expenses $ 1,143,591 $ 990,689 Share-based compensation (1) (288,249 ) (235,136 ) Payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation (5,618 ) (5,194 ) Amortization of acquired intangible assets (4,754 ) (1,130 ) Restructuring charges (4,107 ) — Total non-GAAP costs and expenses $ 840,863 $ 749,229 PINTEREST, INC. RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP FINANCIAL RESULTS (In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 Reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA: Net income $ 21,515 $ 92,108 Depreciation and amortization 10,895 7,205 Share-based compensation (1) 288,249 235,136 Payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation 5,618 5,194 Interest (income) expense, net (6,022 ) (28,536 ) Other (income) expense, net 1,232 (144 ) Provision for (benefit from) income taxes 13,613 (4,912 ) Restructuring charges (2) 4,107 — Adjusted EBITDA $ 339,207 $ 306,051 Reconciliation of net income to non-GAAP net income: Net income $ 21,515 $ 92,108 Share-based compensation (1) 288,249 235,136 Payroll tax expense related to share-based compensation 5,618 5,194 Amortization of acquired intangible assets 4,754 1,130 Restructuring charges (2) 4,107 — Income tax effects and tax adjustments (3) (53,958 ) (70,643 ) Non-GAAP net income $ 270,285 $ 262,925 Basic weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share 567,154 677,819 Weighted-average dilutive securities (4) 15,498 16,713 Diluted weighted-average shares used in computing non-GAAP net income per share 582,652 694,532 Non-GAAP net income per share $ 0.46 $ 0.38 Reconciliation of free cash flow: Net cash provided by operating activities $ 315,733 $ 321,652 Less: Purchases of property and equipment (15,465 ) (3,231 ) Free cash flow $ 300,268 $ 318,421 ________________________________ (1) Excludes share-based compensation expense of $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026, which is included in restructuring charges. (2) We have excluded restructuring charges associated with our Restructuring Plan from Adjusted EBITDA because they are non-recurring and not reflective of our ongoing business operations or the underlying trends in our business. (3) Includes the income tax effect of our non-GAAP adjustments using a long-term projected tax rate of 20% and other tax adjustments. (4) Gives effect to potential common stock instruments such as stock options, unvested restricted stock units and unvested restricted stock awards. More News From Pinterest, Inc. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:43
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:31
2d ago
|
Pinterest Stock Sinks as Signs Point to Slowing Revenue Growth | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The company's fourth-quarter revenue projection came in short of expectations. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:43
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:02
2d ago
|
Micron: The 5x P/E Isn't As Cheap As It Looks, But The Upside Remains | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
SummaryMicron Technology, Inc. is rated a Buy, driven by robust AI-fueled demand, tight memory supply, and strong pricing power supporting exceptional FY26 results.MU delivered Q4 FY26 revenue of $54.22B (up 379% YoY), with gross margins over 87% and EPS of $33.42, far surpassing consensus estimates.AI infrastructure, data centers, automotive, and robotics end-markets are expected to sustain elevated demand and pricing through FY27–FY28, with strategic agreements providing strong visibility.Despite cyclical risks and recent stock underperformance, MU's low valuation multiple and favorable supply-demand dynamics offer meaningful upside potential. vzphotos/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesThe Thesis Exiting FY26, a leading supplier of HBM and NAND solutions, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) delivered another exceptional quarter, with a nearly 380% surge in its revenue and robust bottom-line expansion, as AI-related memory and 1.46K Followers Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in MU over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:41
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:15
2d ago
|
RTX Board of Directors Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
, /PRNewswire/ -- RTX (NYSE: RTX) announced today that its board of directors declared a dividend of 73 cents per outstanding share of RTX common stock. The dividend will be payable on Dec. 10, 2026 to shareowners of record at the close of business on Nov. 20, 2026.RTX has paid cash dividends on its common stock every year since 1936. About RTX With more than 180,000 global employees, we push the limits of technology and science to redefine how we connect and protect our world. With industry-leading capabilities, we advance aviation, engineer integrated defense systems for operational success, and develop nextgeneration technology solutions and manufacturing to help global customers address their most critical challenges. The company, with 2025 sales of more than $88 billion, is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This release includes statements related to dividends that constitute "forward-looking statements" under the securities laws. All forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Past dividends provide no assurance as to future dividends. The timing, payment and amount of future dividends, if any, could vary significantly from past dividends due to a number of risks and uncertainties. These factors include those described under the caption "Risk Factors" in our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC from time to time. Media Contact C: 202.384.2474 Investor Contact C: 781.522.5123 SOURCE RTX |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:40
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:00
2d ago
|
Schwab IMPACT 2026: Matt Tuttle Sees GOOGL as a Buy, ORCL Guidance "Huge" | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Matthew Tuttle believes investors should buy the dip in Alphabet (GOOGL) even after the company posted a double miss in earnings. When it comes to the greater tech trade, Matt shares caution in Anthropic's IPO and why he sees volatile trading action similar to SpaceX (SPCX) and its public trading debut. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:40
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:44
2d ago
|
Stryker Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Stryker (NYSE:SYK) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. Access the full call at https://stryker-3q2026-earnings.open-exchange.net/registration SummaryStryker reported 7.7% organic sales growth in Q3 2026, with notable performances in MedSurg and Neurotechnology (9.1%) and Orthopedics (5.9%). The company is facing challenges in its hip and knee and peripheral vascular businesses due to a market slowdown, cyber incident impacts, and SAP implementation distractions. Despite the challenges, Stryker remains optimistic about the long-term potential of the joint reconstruction market and plans to launch a powered hip impaction solution next year. Stryker completed the acquisition of Xeri Mary, expanding its sports medicine and arthroplasty support, and made a strategic investment in CMR Surgical for the Versius platform. Q3 adjusted EPS increased by 10.3% to $3.52, driven by gross margin expansion and expense management. The company revised its full-year guidance to reflect softer market conditions. Looking ahead to 2027, Stryker is optimistic about growth opportunities from new products and strategic initiatives, including the commercialization of AVS’s IVL platform and new data from the Peerless 2 study. Full TranscriptLayla (Conference Operator) Welcome to the third quarter 2026 Stryker earnings call. My name is Layla and I’ll be your conference operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the conference, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. This conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that the discussions during this conference call will include forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are discussed in the company’s most recent filings with the SEC. Also, the discussions will include certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in today’s press release. That is an exhibit to Stryker’s current report on Form 8-K filed today with the SEC. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Kevin Lobo, Chair and Chief Executive Officer. You may proceed, sir. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Welcome to Stryker’s third quarter earnings call. Joining me today are Preston Wells, CFO, and Nick Mead, Vice President of Investor Relations. Before I begin, I’d like to congratulate Spencer Styles on his appointment as Stryker’s next CEO. Spencer has spent nearly three decades at Stryker helping shape our strategy, strengthen our culture and drive our growth. You will have additional opportunities to hear more from him at various investor events over the next few months and I am confident you will come away with an even greater appreciation of his capabilities to lead Stryker into the future. For today’s call, I’ll provide an overview of performance. Nick will then provide a brief M&A update followed by Preston with additional details on financial results and guidance. We will then open the call to Q&A. Turning to our third quarter performance. Organic sales growth for the quarter was 7.7% with 9.1% growth in MedSurg and Neurotechnology and 5.9% growth in Orthopedics. Our Endoscopy and OrthoTech divisions delivered double-digit performances and Medical also delivered near double-digit growth. While we delivered solid growth in several businesses, our overall results fell short of our expectations. As Preston mentioned during an investor conference this September, we are facing challenges with our hip and knee and peripheral vascular businesses. Beginning with hips and knees, it is now clear that there is a market slowdown in the US. We are seeing slower procedural growth amid affordability concerns from higher insurance premiums and deductibles. We are also observing increased pre-authorization denials, creating additional friction and delaying patient access to treatment. Europe and the Middle East have also remained soft amid regional disruption, strike-related delays and government funding decisions. In addition to the softer market, we have not been winning at our historical rate. 2026 has been an unusual year marked by the cyber incident in the first quarter and an SAP implementation within our orthopedics businesses in July. This is the last of our businesses to go on to SAP and while the system is functioning well, it has created a distraction for our teams and delayed our visibility of market conditions. Although Mako sales have been strong again this year, we are behind our expectations on new product sales for Mako RPS and Triathlon Gold. The feedback on these innovations is very positive, but the cyber incident and SAP implementation have impacted our commercial execution. We are taking actions to improve competitive conversions and new product adoption. Finally, as a leader in power tools, we are excited about bringing a powered hip impaction solution to the market next year, addressing an important product gap in our hip portfolio. We remain confident in the long-term attractiveness of the large joint reconstruction market supported by favorable demographics and expanded access through new sites of care such as ASCs. Next I’d like to give an update on our vascular business, which reflects a sequential improvement from last quarter. The third quarter included one-time revenue from our Peripheral Vascular joint venture in China as a result of achieving a regulatory approval milestone in September. This benefit helped offset the impact of lost revenue from the ongoing supply disruption that we discussed during our last earnings call. Our teams made meaningful progress restoring supply throughout the quarter and we now expect inventory levels and product availability to continue normalizing through the end of the year. While this has been a challenging period, we remain convicted in the outlook for Peripheral Vascular as a growth business accretive to Stryker. Looking ahead to 2027, we expect to begin commercializing AVS’s IVL platform and also look forward to important data from our Peerless 2 study a FlowTriever. We are excited about our recently announced strategic investment in CMR Surgical, which Nick will cover in his section. Our updated organic sales guidance anticipates a similar overall organic growth rate for the company in Q4 as we achieved in Q3. This assumes a continuation of the procedure environment we observed this quarter as well as continued strong capital demand where we continue to maintain an elevated order book. Meanwhile, our successful efforts on margin expansion are limiting the impact of our sales shortfall on adjusted EPS and we continue to generate strong cash flows. As this is the last of 57 earnings calls as CEO, I would have preferred to deliver better news, but we’ve demonstrated before that our business is resilient, our foundation and culture are strong and we remain confident in our ability to deliver on our long-range financial commitments. I will now turn the call over to Nick. Thank you. Nick Mead (Vice President of Investor Relations) My comments today will focus on M&A and will highlight two recent transactions. As announced earlier this week, we have completed our acquisition of Xeri Mary, which expands the support we can provide to specialists across sports medicine and arthroplasty. Zuri Med’s Differentiated Fiber Locker technology is designed to increase biomechanical strength and rotator cuff repair and provides a broader platform for orthopedic soft tissue augmentation. Next, we recently announced an investment in CMR Surgical, an agreement to act as the exclusive US sales agent for the Versius platform. Soft tissue robotics is an attractive adjacency that is a natural extension of Stryker’s strengths in endoscopy, visualization and enabling technologies. Versius has been used in more than 50,000 procedures globally and its scalable design can support broader adoption of robotic-assisted surgery. With its new Versius Plus system approved indications, technology and growing global clinical experience, we believe now is the right time to partner with CMR and begin scaling the US market through a thoughtful, disciplined approach. Together, these transactions reflect our continued focus on investing in opportunities that support durable long-term growth and value creation. I’ll now turn the call over to Preston to further discuss our third quarter performance. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Thanks, Nick. Detailed financial information is included in today’s press release. I’ll focus on our third quarter financial performance, the key drivers of our results, and our updated outlook for the remainder of the year. Organic sales grew 7.7% in the quarter against a strong prior year. Comparable pricing contributed 0.1% to growth while foreign currency had no impact on sales. The quarter had the same number of selling days as the prior year. Quarter adjusted earnings per share were $3.52, up 10.3% from the same quarter last year, driven by gross margin expansion supported by operational efficiencies along with disciplined expense management. Turning to segment performance, MedSurg and Neurotechnology, organic sales grew 9.1% with growth of 9.6% in the U.S. and 7.2% internationally. Instruments U.S. organic sales grew 4.8% against a strong 15.3% prior year, comparable with double-digit growth in our interventional, spine, and surgical technologies businesses. This performance was offset by softer performance in our neurosurgical business due to the deferral of capital purchases ahead of the upcoming launch of our Sonopet 3 ultrasonic aspiration platform, which received FDA 510(k) clearance earlier this month. Endoscopy U.S. organic sales grew 13%, supported by continued robust demand for operating room infrastructure and renovations and strong performance in sports medicine, where double-digit growth continues to be driven by its expanded range of shoulder implant products. Medical U.S. organic sales increased 10%, including double-digit performances for Sage and SmartCare businesses, while capital demand remains elevated across our portfolio. Vascular U.S. organic sales grew 13%, primarily reflecting the drivers that Kevin discussed earlier. Internationally, MedSurg and Neurotechnology organic sales growth of 7.2% included broad strength across Endoscopy, Medical, and Instruments. Geographically, growth was led by robust performances in Australia, Germany, Canada, and India. Orthopedics organic sales were 5.9%, with growth of 6.4% in the U.S. and 4.4% internationally. U.S. knees organic sales grew 1.3% while U.S. hips organic sales declined 0.6% against strong prior year comparables. As Kevin noted, we remain focused on strengthening our commercial execution behind our enabling technology platforms and new products to restore momentum and drive share gains. U.S. Trauma and Extremities organic sales grew 4.5% against a strong 13.2% prior year. Comparable current year growth reflected continued strong performance in upper extremities, supported by continued momentum across our differentiated portfolio, including early success of Mako shoulder on Mako 4. We are expecting strong growth for Trauma and Extremities in the fourth quarter. U.S. OrthoTech organic has increased 18%, supported by continued strength in Mako sales and robust demand for orthopedic power tools. Internationally, Orthopedics organic sales grew 4.4%, supported by knees, OrthoTech, and Trauma and Extremities, and was led regionally by Canada, Japan, Australia, Germany, and India. Turning to margins and other income statement items, adjusted gross margin was 65.4%, up 40 basis points from the third quarter of 2025. The improvement reflected a net tariff benefit and benefits from operational efficiencies. Adjusted operating margin was 26.2% of sales, up 60 basis points from the third quarter of 2025, reflecting the gross margin improvement and continued expense discipline. Adjusted other income and expense was $91 million, down $25 million from the same quarter last year, reflecting lower debt levels. We now expect adjusted other income and expense to be approximately $400 million for the full year. The third quarter had an adjusted effective tax rate of 16%. We now expect our full year effective tax rate to be in the range of 15.5% to 16%. Turning to cash and capital allocation, we ended the third quarter with approximately $3.3 billion of cash and cash equivalents and year-to-date cash from operations of $3.3 billion, an increase of approximately 14% compared to the prior year. During the quarter, we repurchased $1 billion of shares under our previously existing share repurchase program. Additionally, we received Board authorization for another $3 billion towards future share repurchases, which provides us additional flexibility while preserving our capacity to invest in strategic M&A growth opportunities. Based on our year-to-date results, we are revising our full-year guidance to reflect softer hip and knee procedure trends, lingering supply constraints in peripheral vascular, and mitigation of operational execution risk related to capital equipment sales. We now expect full-year organic net sales growth of 6.5% to 7% and adjusted net earnings per share of $14.80 to $14.90. Our revised adjusted earnings per share outlook reflects continued expense discipline and gross margin expansion. Looking ahead, we remain confident in the long-term trajectory of our business. Our diversified portfolio, leading positions in attractive markets, robust innovation pipeline, and expanding Mako ecosystem provide a strong foundation for sustainable growth. As we plan for 2027, our priorities remain focused on category leadership, advancing innovation, and driving operational excellence to deliver market-leading sales growth while continuing to expand margins and grow earnings. We are continuing to assess market conditions, procedural volume trends, and the broader macroeconomic environment as we finalize forecasts for 2027. While we will not provide formal guidance until early next year, we do expect to deliver growth at the high end of our markets. With that, I will now open the call for Q&A. Layla (Conference Operator) At this time, we will open the floor for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press Star five on your telephone keypad. You may remove yourself at any time by pressing Star five again. We would like to remind callers to please limit themselves to one question and one follow-up question so we can accommodate as many participants as possible. And we’ll pause just a moment. Okay. Our first question will come from Robbie with J.P. Morgan. Your line is now unmuted. Please go ahead. Robbie Marcus (Analyst) Great. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking the questions. Two for me. First, Kevin, clearly disappointing to hear about the ortho market. Where do you think market growth is now? Anything the industry could do to help stem the decline? Is it extremities as well as hips and knees? And then I have a follow-up. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Thanks. Thanks, Robbie. What we saw was really a slowdown in the hip and knee portion of the market, not really extremities. Our extremities business, especially upper extremities, continues to be very high growth. So we’re not seeing much of an impact there. It’s really the hip and knee market where we’re seeing the slowdown. It’s hard to estimate exactly, but I would say market growth is kind of in the 2.5% range this year. That’s what we think, which is definitely a step down from where it has been the last six years. And as you know, it took us a while to figure this out. There’s a lot of noise with our cyber event, noise with some of the things going on competitively, and then our SAP implementation, which really delayed a lot of order entry. So we really started to figure this out kind of in early September when Preston made his remarks at the investor conference. But this has happened before in my tenure, earlier in my tenure, where we’ve had kind of a year like this and things have turned. So we’ll have to monitor this closely. Certainly it was a surprise for us and that is reflected in our guidance. Robbie Marcus (Analyst) I appreciate you not guiding for 2027 at this point. There’s a lot of moving pieces here as we think about some of the shifting market dynamics. Where do you think Stryker’s weighted average end-market growth is as we head into year-end, and any puts or takes we should be considering respective to margins? I know this is a pretty healthy margin business in ortho. How should we think about that down the P&L? Thanks. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, Robbie. So in terms of the weighted average market growth, and we said a year ago at our investor conference that we believe we were about 6% is what we thought we were. Now, obviously, if you take into account what’s happening across the joint replacement of the hip and knee market, you know, that’s probably taken a little bit of a tick down from there. So we’re continuing to look at and understand kind of where that nets out. So I think if we have those couple of pieces, you can see, you know, we’re probably a little bit of a step down from where we said a year ago in terms of our overall growth rate. And as I mentioned in my remarks, our goal will be, as we start on 2027, that we will perform at the high end of those markets as we go into there. Looking at the margins, you know, our expectation around margins is that, you know, we want to continue to deliver what we committed to a year ago as well. You know, we feel like we’re putting the right plans in place from an operational excellence standpoint. We’re really getting after our manufacturing element and gross margins from that standpoint, as well as just looking at other efficiencies up and down the P&L. So you’re right, the joint replacement market is certainly a more profitable gross margin business. But overall, we feel like we’re putting the right pieces in place to continue to try to drive margin improvement year over year. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Larry Beigelsen with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Larry Beigelsen (Analyst) Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. So, Kevin, given this is your last earnings call, congratulations on creating a lot of shareholder value at Stryker, and Spencer, congratulations on your new role. I wanted to start with the CMR investment, actually. Why is CMR the right partner for you? How will you and CMR compete against the big incumbent? And if you do decide to acquire it, how will you absorb the high cost of developing and marketing a competitive soft tissue robot? And I have one follow-up. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, thanks, Larry. Look, the soft tissue robotic market is very appealing. As you know, I’ve been talking about it for years. We’ve looked at every robot around the world and had multiple looks at these robots. When Versius Plus came along, the upgraded version of Versius, we got a chance to see something that we felt very excited about. We feel it is the best robot on the market to be able to succeed in multiple sites of care. The modular nature makes it great for the ambulatory surgery center as well as working well in hospitals. And frankly, robotic penetration is very low in general surgery. So we look at winning as being able to convert open surgery and convert laparoscopic surgery to robotic regardless of competing with the incumbent. There’s plenty of room for two players in the market, but this will work in hospitals. This will work very well for high-volume procedures like cholecystectomies and appendectomies and hernias. And so it can be a very high-volume, simple-to-use small platform robot that’s highly, highly functional. And to your question about risk, one of the reasons we’re going about it in this manner is we want to de-risk this and have our people do the commercialization in the US as an investor but not a full owner. Our hope and our plan is that we will eventually purchase this. We’re not going to get into details about when that would be, but that is our plan. This is our bet in the soft tissue robotic place. We’re putting a lot of resources on this and that is our expectation that we will be able to take out the asset and be able to drive value for Stryker. We’ve done this before with Mako. And we had the challenges of development; this is further along, frankly, in its journey than Mako was when we acquired Mako. And again, we’re very excited. It’s a very high-growth segment of MedTech and we believe this is going to be a winning solution that we are hopeful to acquire in the not too distant future. Larry Beigelsen (Analyst) That’s helpful. And Kevin, it’s been a while since the last new product super cycle. You talked about the recent Sonopet clearance. You have the Hip Impactor next year and the Peerless 2 data. What other products or growth drivers would you highlight for next year? Thank you. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Well, we have the next version of Neptune, which is our big waste management platform within Instruments that’s coming in the first half of next year. That’s going to be a very exciting launch. We have the ABS product, as you know, that we’re expecting FDA approval towards the end of this year. That’ll be a shot in the arm for our peripheral vascular business. And we have in the not too distant future — we’re not going to give you dates — we have System 10 coming for power tools. We have 1688 coming as well for endoscopy. And so we’re going to continue to be launching products on a pretty sustained basis across. And I’m not even getting into all the smaller products that we have. Obviously we’ve acquired a great platform for sports medicine with Zurbit that’ll plug right into our existing shoulder businesses. And so there are a bunch of other products which we’ll get into later on other calls. But major platforms, Neptune — major platform; Sonopet — major platform; 1688 coming, System 10 coming. So we have a lot. And don’t forget Mako RPS is just getting started. Triathlon Gold just getting started. Medial stabilized inserts doing very well. And so the power tool factor is very important in hips for us. That’s a really important gap to be able to do competitive conversions. Having that power tool package can be very important for us in the hip business. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Joanne Wunsch with Citi. Go ahead, Joanne. Joanne Wunsch (Analyst) Good afternoon. Thank you. Good noon and congratulations to you both. I do have a memory of ebbs and flows in the orthopedics market and editing market. But generally, could you remind what brought us out the last time and what can be learned from that to think about bringing us out this time? Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Well, in the past sometimes it’s been tied to economic activity. So when you see economic pressures, people feeling strained financially — I mean there are patients that today are having trouble being able to make their deductible because their deductibles are higher. And to be able to fund their deductible, they’re actually living with pain a little bit longer than they would like to. So as sort of economic conditions tend to improve for the, let’s call it, average person in the market, then you start to see the demand pick up. And frankly these diseases are degenerative, so you can delay these for a while, but the pain reaches the point where you can’t sleep at night. And so we see this as not a market that’s going to go away. It’s just there’s this temporary delay that’s happening right now and the market will come back. It’s hard to predict exactly when, but it has historically tied more to sort of economic cycles. If you go back, Joanne, I think that’s a correlation you’ll probably note. Joanne Wunsch (Analyst) Oh, cool, thank you. And I think just to pick up from a previous question, to say you grow at the high end of where your market growth is, we’re all going to be updating our models and talking about lots of fun stuff. Can you give us some parameters around that? Just give us some footing as we think about next year? Thank you. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah. Joanne, I would just point you back to what we said a year ago again in terms of what we think our WAMGR is across all of our businesses. We’re not going to obviously go detailed business by business, but if we look at just that overall WAMGR, then think about this new kind of reality that we’re living within the hip and knee market and that probably takes a little bit of a tick down. And then again, our expectation is that we’re going to grow faster than what that looks like. Layla (Conference Operator) Your next question will come from Ryan Zimmerman with BTIG. Your line is unmuted. Please go ahead. Ryan Zimmerman (Analyst) Good afternoon. And Kevin, 57/4 is a nice run. Congratulations on the fourth quarter. I think if you look at the implied math, you know, it shakes out to around 7.9% organic, roughly in line with kind of what you guys saw this quarter. Preston, you know, you highlighted the areas that you think are going to be weak — orthopedics, peripheral vascular, etc. Maybe help us think about what’s accretive in the implied organic growth for fourth quarter, where you’re seeing momentum, where you’re seeing strength. It sounds like extremities is holding up nicely in some of the other MedSurg businesses as well. But just help us offset some of that weakness or where you see that could be offset. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Absolutely. So, I mean, again, we expect that — like I said, I think that implied number is pretty good. I think we’ll be looking at areas like trauma and extremities, as you mentioned. We expect that to have a very strong quarter. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, the other areas I would look at: Medical will have a really good quarter. So we expect that to perform well. Instruments is another area that we would expect to have strong performances as well. And then I think the others, again, it’s just a matter of keeping par with some of what we’ve done today. As Kevin mentioned, around peripheral vascular, while we still see that being pressured, it should be a little bit better underlying in terms of where we expect that to perform also. So I think we have a few areas that we’ll certainly be leaning on as we come into the fourth quarter, and we’ll continue to work on the execution in other areas that Kevin mentioned as well, even in some of those softer spaces. Ryan Zimmerman (Analyst) And maybe turning to capital — thank you, Preston, for that — and then maybe just turning to capital for a minute. I mean, you’ve talked about the strength of the order book, but at the same time it’s kind of balanced by some of your other comments around capital. And so if we could step back and give us your view of capital in the market, maybe what you’re seeing. There’s been a lot of chatter about 340B and the impact to hospitals. And so would love to understand kind of where you’re seeing maybe strong capital demand at higher price points versus lower price points, etc. I’d appreciate those thoughts. Nick Mead (Vice President of Investor Relations) Hey, Ryan, this is Nick. I’ll take that from a capital perspective. So, you know, really there’s two components there. There’s the demand side of the capital equation and then there’s us executing on the demand. From a demand perspective, the order book remains strong and elevated. And of course, there’s nuances by business, but by and large, the capital environment remains healthy. What we’re focused on is continuing to execute on that demand from a capacity perspective. And we’re laser focused to ensure that we have plans in place to deliver on all those businesses that Preston just mentioned in terms of putting together the full year. Layla (Conference Operator) Your next question will come from the line of Travis Steed with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Travis Steed (Analyst) Hey, thanks for the question, Spencer. Congrats on the CEO job, Chris. When you think about calling out market slowdown versus the winning rate and what data points are helping kind of build out what’s the market slowdown versus the win rate. And it seems like, at least to me from where I sit, maybe things got a little worse later in September versus kind of what was being messaged at the September conference. So I don’t know if things kind of worsened over the course of September for you as well. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, look, I wouldn’t say things worsened in September. We only gained visibility to the quarter kind of in the September timeframe because there were huge delays in order entry given the change to SAP. So we only recognized it later in the quarter. But it wasn’t just something that fell off in the month of September. And the other thing I’d say is if you look at our sales, we don’t do bulk sales within our hip and knee business. And so when you see our numbers, they tend to be pretty reflective of what’s happening in the market because we don’t have that exaggeration of bulk sales. And it’s going to be a combination. The market’s definitely slow. We know we’re not losing major bits of business to the competition. So that tells us that it’s mostly market related. But we have been gaining share at a higher rate very consistently for the past five, six years. And our teams were distracted. They clearly weren’t focused as much on this. And that’s why we think the market growth definitely declined, but we weren’t taking share the way we had been taking share in the past. Travis Steed (Analyst) Okay, that’s helpful. And how does the cyber impact in 26 impact 2027? Is it an easy comp? Is there ability to catch up in 27? And I just want to make sure it sounds like 6% is kind of the floor for total company growth next year. I just want to make sure I heard that correctly. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Yes. Let me answer your cyber question. So we haven’t gone through yet all the different quarterly splits, etc., for next year’s planning process. But certainly as you look at cyber, it’ll be something that we’ll have to talk about anniversarying clearly in the first quarter. But then we’ll also anniversary bits of the recovery throughout the year. So we’re going to have to really talk through, as we go through each quarter, kind of the impacts as we can kind of detail them out. But the reality is for much of the cyber incident, that’s been made back up just at different points in time. And I think when we look at our performance in ’27 versus ’26, it’s really going to be a matter of looking at kind of overall performance versus the market and any market changes that are happening from ’26 to ’27. In terms of the floor, we’re not setting guidance right now, so we’re just giving a bit of an indicator as to how we’re starting to think about ’27. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I think the takeaway is the market slowed down. In joint replacement, we’ve had this challenge with SAP that we believe we’ll be through. It affected joint replacement and also affected our core trauma business pretty significantly. We think that we’ll be through that. And the underlying fundamentals of our business in every other area are strong. Capital demand, very strong. And we have a pretty good innovation cycle. So despite this order’s takedown on the guide, the fundamentals are still very, very strong. Looking ahead, Layla (Conference Operator) Your next question will come from Matthew O’Brien with Piper Sandler. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Matthew O’Brien (Analyst) Afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. And Kevin, it’s been an absolute pleasure watching you grow this business. I guess I’m still a little hung up on this hip and knee commentary about Q3 here because if I look at your Ortho tech number, that was really good. It still seems like, generally speaking, the macro environment’s really healthy. I actually talked to a CDMO yesterday. They said things are pretty steady. I’m trying to reconcile this slowdown versus all these other data points that look like they’re still fairly positive. And what I’m really kind of getting at is it feels like this could be a very short-term blip and that the recovery could be very quick. Is that fair? Are there certain parts of the market? I don’t know if it’s, you know, private-pay patients versus, you know, versus Medicare patients or anything else like that you can point to that says this is the one area that’s really slowing down and that we could see a snapback in that area going forward. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Look, I don’t have a crystal ball, so it’s really going to be difficult to predict if there’ll be a snapback. There have been confounding data points all year on the market. I mean, one of the big hospital chains just announced their results earlier this week and talked about a significant slowdown in hips and knees, and they’re a very large operator. So that’s a data point. Then there are other data points that say it’s not as bad. So I think your point is the most accurate point is things come back, and it’s hard to predict when they come back. You might be right. There could be a snapback. But we’re not going to count on that. As we give our guide, we’re assuming it stays where it is right now. The market stays where it is. We have seen times in the past where it came back pretty quickly. We’ve seen other times where it’s taken a little longer, and I really don’t have a great feel for when this will return. Matthew O’Brien (Analyst) Okay. And then just quickly, on the vascular business it did look like it popped back up here a little bit, which is great to see. Can you just talk about kind of the state of the vascular business and then your IVL plans as we go into 2017? Thank you. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. Look, the state of the business is we have a very stable and high-performing sales organization, which was last year’s challenge. If you recall, we had a lot of salesforce challenges. That’s well behind us, and the sales and marketing organization is really solid. As we came back up after the cyber incident, we had a lot of challenges with our manufacturing facility, and that put us in a backorder, and that has been very, very painful. It got better in the last quarter. We also had the one-time benefit which I mentioned in my opening remarks, but I’m starting to feel like IVL’s—the excitement from our customers is incredible. Customers are really excited about the technology, the mechanism of action. And it’s the same customer that also uses our other peripheral vascular products. So we believe that synergy is going to be fantastic. Not only will the product, we believe, perform very well, but we believe it’ll have a synergistic effect on the base business. So we’re looking—we’re just waiting for the FDA approval, and the teams are already preparing for launch. Layla (Conference Operator) Your next question will come from the line of Matthew Taylor with Jefferies. Your line is unmuted. Matthew Taylor (Analyst) Hi. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask you a somewhat conceptual but also pragmatic question about AI. You know, you’ve seen other areas of the market, and even in healthcare recently, a lot of subsectors get credit for AI and the improvements that it could bring. It doesn’t seem like that’s really happened at all in Medtech, and yet you have a couple businesses now with robotics and surgery and connected care that I would think, over time, could have significant product benefits, development benefits from AI. So I was hoping you could talk about that a little bit—why you think Medtech hasn’t gotten credit and the kind of benefits that we could see from AI on your business and in Medtech over time. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I think what we’ve generally seen within healthcare, and Medtech specifically, is when you have new cycles of technology innovation, it tends to take longer before it has an impact. Just the regulated nature of our industry tends to cause it to take a little bit longer. Robotics is a good example where robotics has taken hold in a lot of other industries and more recently has really started to take off in Medtech. We focused a lot of our energy on AI for innovation. Yes, we have some productivity initiatives ongoing, but we have three FDA-approved AI products, and you referenced a couple of them when you were speaking in your question, and we have a number of other ones. Most of our product innovations that we’re launching—anything in an enabling tech world—is likely going to have some kind of AI component to it, and we’re very excited about the promise. Bringing science to healthcare and using AI to help drive that science so that when you visit a surgeon, you’re not just getting their one lived person’s experience; you’re going to be getting a wealth of data at their disposition to be able to make informed decisions, just like we do with our Blueprint pre-planning software for upper extremities. So we are investing in it. You’re going to hear more from us. It is always a little bit slower in Medtech. That’s just the nature of innovations in a regulated industry. Matthew Taylor (Analyst) Thank you, Kevin. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Thank you. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Vijay Kumar with Evercore ISI. Your line is unmuted. Vijay Kumar (Analyst) Hi, guys. Thank you for taking my question. Kevin, maybe my first one for you. When you look at ’27 and the new products you listed out, I think in the past when we had these System 9s and 1788 launches, you called them super cycles. I’m curious, given the current environment, how would you characterize this impact of new products? Is this still something that you would characterize as a super cycle for ’27? Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, look, the phrase was important because we had a number of platforms all being launched at the same time. And what I’d say is our innovation never stops, and sometimes the timing is just all at the same time; sometimes it’s metered out over—you have a power tool launch one year, a camera launch the next year, a Mako upgrade the next year. So sometimes they’re a little bit more spaced out. They just happened to be condensed all in one sort of cluster, if you will. But I would say that we have great innovation. Ongoing innovation gets rewarded in Medtech, and so we are going to continue to invest in innovation. And the platforms—like I’m incredibly excited about—it has some features that it’s going to be a step change. So as 16-8 was a step change, 1788 was a little bit more. I think 1888 is going to be fantastic. Then we have System 10 and we have all the other products across our portfolio that will be launching. Neptune is a great product. That platform change obviously drives growth. So every time we do these innovations, it drives growth, and that is not changing. That dynamic isn’t changing. And the capital market’s really good. We’re seeing our order book being elevated. We’re not draining our backlog. And we’re just, frankly—if you think about Medical as a good example—LUCAS 3.5 and ProCuity are still new products. I know they don’t sound new, but these products ramp over an extended period of time just because the replacement cycle is a lot longer on beds, stretchers, and defibrillators. And so the demand for those products is very significant. And we’re actually building extra capacity, especially in beds. The demand is very strong. And so those are still kind of new products even though they’ve been launched a little while ago because of the replacement cycle. So we feel good about our innovation. It’s alive and well in our company. And a number of those launches will occur in 2017. Vijay Kumar (Analyst) That’s helpful. Question one for you. I saw the buyback in the quarter. You have a new authorization for 3 billion. What’s the, I guess, philosophy behind capital allocation decisions? Right. Is this something that you would consider as more opportunistic in nature when you think about deploying capital towards buybacks? Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Vijay, thanks for the question. As we said last quarter, given the timing of when we have our deal flow from an M&A standpoint, we would look at more opportunistic share buyback opportunities, and that’s kind of what we saw. That’s what we saw in the third quarter, and we’ll continue to evaluate that in the fourth quarter as well. But just to reiterate—Nick talked a little bit about this in his prepared remarks—capital allocation, from our standpoint, the number one priority remains M&A. And so we want to continue to put our dollars towards M&A. But just given the timing of what we’ve had this year, what we see, this does just give us the opportunity to go out and do some opportunistic repurchases of shares. The one thing I would say, too, is it doesn’t take away from any of our firepower. I think what we’ve been able to demonstrate over the last several years is a continued increase in our ability to generate cash at a higher rate—some of it’s scale, some of it’s the work that we’re doing on working capital and other areas. And so that gives us a lot of flexibility now to go out and enhance our capital allocation in terms of how we’re thinking about where we put our dollars to drive shareholder value. So this just gives us another lever to do that. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I’d just like to add something about M&A. So we continue to remain a disciplined acquirer. And we had a number of targets that we weren’t able to close on this year, and some of those targets basically didn’t stall and we hope will actually come back to us as opportunities in the future. And so we do have an active pipeline, but with the sheer amount of cash we’re generating, we’re able to do these buybacks and still pursue all of the deals that we’re pursuing right now. And we intend to remain active in M&A going forward. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from the line of Chris Paschall with Barclays. Your line is unmuted. Please go ahead. Chris Paschall (Analyst) Thanks. You mentioned mitigating execution risk related to capital equipment sales as one of the factors behind the guidance revision. Was just hoping you’d elaborate on that. Are you saying you’re just being more conservative about what’s assumed between now and year-end just to absorb any delays that might crop up, or is there more to it in terms of what you’re seeing out there in the market? Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) No, Chris, I think that’s right. When Nick said earlier with regards to capital, demand is there. We’re seeing very, very strong demand. We talked about ramping production, which we’ve been doing, and we were able to do on many of our lines, particularly around Medical. It’s just making sure that we can match that production and supply with the demand as it continues to grow. So, again, it’s a bit of just a more conservative view in terms of our ability to make sure that we are executing at the highest level to meet all the demand that is out there from a capital standpoint. Nick Mead (Vice President of Investor Relations) I mean, as we look at the market, we typically do not tend to over-index on one specific quarter. If you look at the trends over the past, you know, 12 months, we really haven’t seen any notable movement in share. We’ve been growing more in line with market. You know, if you look back for the past few years, we’ve certainly been exceeding market growth by a meaningful amount. And over the past couple quarters, for a variety of reasons that Kevin talked about, we’ve been growing more in line with the market. You know, as we think about our performance moving forward, we’re excited to play offense and certainly having the hip impactor in our portfolio is going to allow us to do that in 2027 and beyond. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) The thing I would add from a knee standpoint—Kevin mentioned this—is really just continued execution of our enabling tech strategy, really talking about Mako 4, Mako RPS, along with the new products that he mentioned with Triathlon Gold and MSI. Those are elements that we feel give us a lot of opportunity to play offense, as Nick mentioned. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. And I’d add that the medial stabilized insert is actually doing very well and getting really positive feedback. It’s a poly insert, but there’s a demand in the market and to be able to convert business, that’s something we’re very bullish about. That start has been very good and I think that could be an accelerator going forward. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Patrick Wood with UBS. You’re unmuted. Please go ahead. Patrick Wood (Analyst) Beautiful. Thanks, guys. Two quick ones. One, just the state of the union on the SmartCare business—like for Vocera and Care AI. I know obviously ours last quarter, but that’s been a big push this year. So that’s the first one. And the second, extremities is obviously still doing very well. What do you think it is that’s distinct about, say, shoulder, that is enabling it to sort of bat off some of the pressures that hip and knee has seen? I know the base market growth is way higher, but in your mind, what’s distinct about the patient pool that’s enabling that to remain as strong as it sounds like it is. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, so the first thing I’d say is SmartCare had its best quarter in our history this past quarter. So it was a big contributor to the growth in Medical. It’s small relative to the size of Medical in dollars, but it had very high double-digit growth in the quarter. Orders are picking up. The integration of Care AI with Vocera is smooth. We’ve moved things to the cloud. So a lot of the early integration pains that we’ve had, we’re through that, and we are very excited about the momentum—the most excited I’ve been since, frankly, we’ve done those acquisitions. The integration is smooth, the customer experience is terrific. Virtual nursing is really becoming a common topic across hospitals to drive productivity, and Care AI is very well suited for that. So I would say I’m more bullish than ever about this. It’s taken us a while, admittedly, but we had a terrific quarter in Q3 and we expect that to continue going forward. Second part—oh, shoulder. Yeah, shoulder. Look, it’s a little bit a newer joint. If you think about hips and knees have been around a long time. Shoulder, the results from shoulder joint replacement are really terrific. In the past, they sort of didn’t have the same degree of great outcomes, and obviously we’re the number one player in that, with the Tornier implants that we have and so many innovations that we’ve launched—short stem, stemless. We now have Mako Shoulder, that application that’s creating us. We have the pyrocarbon that’s really great for sort of a hemiarthroplasty. So we have so much innovation and we’ve sort of been scaling those innovations in Shoulder ID, which is a personalized glenoid. These are all launches we’ve had over the past two years that have kind of scaled and created tremendous differentiation in our shoulder business. So the market as a whole is growing faster and has been growing faster than hips and knees for a while because it’s a newer market where people are now seeing great outcomes, telling their friends about it. And I think it’s going to be a very big market in the future because a lot of people are living with pain and that they get addressed. And I think that Mako Shoulder will actually potentially grow the market, as hip and knee surgeons that used to do shoulders, if they’re familiar with Mako, they may very well go back to doing shoulders again, which they potentially had abandoned in the past. Patrick Wood (Analyst) Thanks, guys. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Mike Mattson with Needham and Company. Mike Matson (Analyst at Needham & Company) Yeah, thanks for taking my question. Just wanted to ask one on the commentary around the hip and knee market. I think you’re seeing two and a half percent growth. Was that kind of your estimate of the year-to-date growth or the growth in the third quarter? Because just looking at your numbers in the third quarter, it looks like you were about flat, which would imply a fair bit of market share loss. It sounds like you’re sort of saying that you think you grew in line with the market. I’m just trying to figure out, has the market gone from low to just more flattish in the third quarter here? Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) No, so—so again, I think Nick mentioned this as well. You know, we never look at a quarter in this hip and knee market and kind of say that’s indicative of a trend. And so when we talk about two and a half, we’re really trying to understand and extrapolate over the course of the year or even the last trailing 12 months—hard to do since not everybody’s reported yet. And so we have to wait and see what that looks like. But that’s our read on the market kind of year to date—is that, roughly, we’ll call it roughly two and a half is where it’s growing. Mike Matson (Analyst at Needham & Company) Okay, but the message is that you think it was slower in the third quarter than the first half of the year. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) We do think it slowed down a bit more. We do think it slowed down a bit more. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Jason Bedford with Raymond James. Elaine (Analyst at Raymond James) Hi, this is Elaine on for Jason. Thanks for taking the question. You talked about the factors driving the ortho slowdown and I was wondering, are you seeing similar dynamics have an impact on MedSurg volumes or would you say that MedSurg is more insulated given the acute nature of the procedures? Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, the latter. We see that’s more insulated. We have not seen a slowdown there. Preston talked about our growth drivers heading into Q4 and a lot of those are on the MedSurg side. Elaine (Analyst at Raymond James) Okay, thanks. And I’ll have a follow-up. So OrthoTech came in a bit better than our expectation, despite the broader ortho softness. Can you talk about what enabled it to do better? And do you have an update on the progress with Mako Shoulder and Mako RPS? Thanks. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. So yeah, we were very pleased with the OrthoTech performance. Mako growth was tremendous. And as a reminder, we have a balance between upgrades as well as brand new installations, and that balance continues since we launched the Mako 4 platform. We also had a very strong performance from our orthopedic instruments business—so those are the power tool–type business. They did very well. Capital sales there were very strong in the quarter. So those are both very good. And then Mako RPS is off to a slow start—really good customer feedback, but we’ve got to get our salesforce playing offense, and they were a bit distracted last quarter. So we have incentives in place and a commercial offense that’s going to lean in a lot more on RPS as we go forward. And then the shoulder for Mako is getting really, really good feedback and contributing to the shoulder growth. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from Mike Kratke with Leerink Partners. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Sam (Analyst) Yeah, hi, this is Sam on for Mike. Thanks for taking our question. So it just seems like we’re hearing anecdotes of price competition getting more intense in orthopedics. So we’re just wondering what you guys are seeing out there on the pricing side and your expectation for 2027. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Yes. From a price perspective, we’ve maintained kind of our same expectations through the year. I mean, we expect modest price across the entirety of our portfolio. That’ll likely come more on the MedSurg side—we’ll get some positive price—and on the ortho side, you know, we’re trying to hold as much price as possible, but we’ll end up in a slightly negative position, which is not significantly different than where we were last year. And so from our perspective, we’re not expecting anything significantly different than that. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, you know, we—I picked up some noise in the market around prices going down because of bulk sales. So there is some activity. It’s not happening at Stryker; we don’t do bulk sales. We report our price—we actually report price, which not everybody does in our market. And so that’s what I hear. Outside of that sort of base business, normal contracting, it’s a pretty stable pricing environment. So that’s the noise that we hear, but it certainly doesn’t apply to us. Sam (Analyst) Got it. Helpful. And then just on the vascular side, you know, can you provide any color on how much in share loss during this interim disruption you kind of view as temporary versus potentially more durable, and you know, how difficult it may be to get back any lost share in accounts that have been disrupted. Nick Mead (Vice President of Investor Relations) Yeah. So what I would say is we feel really good about being able to get back on offense, as Kevin mentioned. And so anything that we feel like we’ve lost we believe is temporary and that we’ll be able to get back out and start winning that business back. Certainly having AVs and launching that product sometime next year will be a big help as we continue to build out and diversify the portfolio to have a winning offense in ’27. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question will come from the line of Richard Newitter with Truist. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Richard Newitter (Analyst) Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe just the first, congrats on the CMR Surgical deal. I guess maybe you could just tell us why that asset. Kevin, you’ve talked a lot in the past—you don’t feel rushed, you guys are going to make the right decision—and just maybe also as you answer that, the why now, why that asset? And then why not just purchase it outright? Thank you. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I think I sort of mentioned this earlier in the call, but an outright purchase comes with a lot of risk and then huge costs for continued ongoing development. And we have to make sure that this is going to be a commercial success in the United States that really will determine the ultimate success of CMR. And so we are going to actually run the sales office in the United States and we know how to run sales. So we believe it will be very successful. But we don’t want to put all our eggs in this basket. It’s a high-risk kind of a deal. There’s still ongoing development. They have a really strong team. They’ve changed to Versius Plus, which has been excellent. We’ve been talking to this company for a long time, for many years. We know them very, very well. We’ve watched their trajectory. They have about 10-plus years of experience, and time over target in robotics is actually really important. We saw that with Mako. Having all those years under their belt before we acquired it was massively helpful. But we don’t want to just jump in here. Unlike Mako, which had implants attached to it, this is a pure adjacency and it’s not something we wanted to rush into necessarily. And it’s just a risk we felt we didn’t need or want to take at this time and also put a lot of other financial pressures onto the rest of our portfolio. So it’s financially de-risked, operationally de-risked. But we like the partner. We have a great relationship with their leadership. And the Versius Plus—the improvements that they made to that system—we always liked the design, the modular nature, easy to move around between rooms. So great for the ASC or great if you have a lot of surgeons that want the robot. Today, there’s many surgeons that would love to use a robot, but they don’t have one in their hospital. And this is, as I said, great for those high-volume procedures that’ll switch from being laparoscopic and open into robotic. So the feedback—we did surgeon testing, a lot of evaluations—and feedback was really positive. We hired a medical director on as part of the endoscopy team, Dr. Santiago Horgan, who is very famous, and he looked at every single robot. He was our chief advisor on this, but also used a panel of surgeons to assess all different robotic technologies. There were a few that we liked and this one was the clear winner. But not jumping in, all told, is because it’s a new space, it’s a pure adjacency. There is obviously a large incumbent and we have to be able to prove the U.S. success. But our plan is this does work and that we do eventually take it. Yeah, well, for now we’re going to hold off making any comments until we see it in the marketplace. But we love our solution, which of course has multiple applications on the same robot, which this will not have, and obviously proven success. Robots aren’t easy and as we’ve seen with other offerings in the marketplace, it takes a little while to get it to start to perform in a decent way. And we have the leading platform. We looked at this company, obviously, earlier on, but I’m going to reserve judgment and wait till we see what happens. Let’s see it come to market. And all I can say is robots are hard and it’s not something that I’m really afraid of in the near term. But we’ll see. Layla (Conference Operator) Our next question comes from Matt Blackman with TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Matt Blackman (Analyst at TD Cowen) Hi, thanks for taking the question. Kevin, just one for you and then one for Preston. You were talking about CMR a few times in the call, but I’m just curious if you could give us maybe a deeper view on where you think the biggest opportunity is. Is it just conversion from lap or open? Which bucket do you think has the largest opportunity? And maybe how should we think about the potential for you to integrate your tower with CMR? You mentioned 1888 is coming. It’s a step change versus 1788. Just curious if that really helps you go deeper in existing surgery suites. Does it seem to help you? Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. So the second part of your question I’m really not going to answer because we haven’t bought the company and, in fact, we haven’t even closed our agreement, but it will close shortly. But we’re going to work with CMR. It’s still their company. We’re an investor, we have a stake in the company, and we have a board seat with the company. But we’ll work with them. You do need a tower with their robot and, obviously, if we’re commercializing the robot, chances are we’re going to try to partner with our tower. But there are a lot of synergy opportunities and we will work with them on some of those synergy opportunities. And then ultimately, when we eventually acquire this, then we’ll be able to talk at length about our plans. So for now it is a relationship that we have with them and we will show them things that we can collaborate on. But ultimately they’re going to have to agree because it is still their company. Definitely the biggest opportunity is conversion of laparoscopic and open to robotic. That’s where the biggest opportunity is. Again, it doesn’t mean that we won’t be chosen in some cases versus the competitive offering. But that’s really not the prime focus. There are a lot of procedures done today and laparoscopic isn’t easy. Laparoscopic suturing is not easy. Robotics will make these procedures easy to perform and we think that’ll drive much higher adoption of minimally invasive surgery. Matt Blackman (Analyst at TD Cowen) Thank you. And Preston, earlier in the call I think someone mentioned that there was a China JV revenue ahead in the quarter. Just wondering if you might be able to quantify it for the quarter. Preston Wells (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah, so yes, we did get a one-time benefit out of our joint venture in China. As a reminder, this was a joint venture that was based when we purchased Inari. We aren’t calling it out specifically. What I would just say is the underlying business—the ongoing underlying peripheral vascular and vascular business—is about in line earlier in September and similar to the performance and impact that it had on the business in second quarter. Layla (Conference Operator) Our final question will come from Vic Cho with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now unmuted. Vic Cho (Analyst at BMO Capital Markets) Thanks for squeezing me in. Just a quick question for you on ZuriMED. I’m just wondering how that FiberLock technology expands the soft tissue augmentation portfolio and anything you can share around revenues and timelines. Thank you. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Look, it’s a little early for us to share much on revenue and timelines. What I’d tell you is it’s a very differentiated performance product. It has an open system in terms of the type of material that you’re able to attach to drive that fixation. We love the applicator. The applicator is almost like magic the way it applies the fixation—really designed—and we think it’s going to be an absolute winner. As you know, this is an area that rotator cuffs have a lot of failures. And this additional augmentation will provide tremendous clinical benefits. And it has been a fast-growing part of the market. We did not have a solution for this and we looked at similarities and we passed on them because we didn’t feel they were differentiating enough. And this one is the one we feel will be an absolute winner. We already have, and the timing is just perfect. We can launch all these shoulder products and now we have this augment as well. So it’s really something that we’re excited about. We’ll share more details as we launch it in terms of success, but I do believe it’s going to be a winner in the market. Layla (Conference Operator) There are no further questions. I will turn the call over to Kevin Lobo for closing remarks. Kevin Lobo (Chair and Chief Executive Officer) Well, thank you all for joining our call and thanks for all the time we’ve had over the years. We look forward to sharing our Q4 and full year 2020 with you. The next earnings call. Thank you. Layla (Conference Operator) This concludes the third quarter 2026 Stryker earnings call. You may now disconnect. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:40
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 18:36
2d ago
|
Stryker (SYK) Q3 Earnings and Revenues Lag Estimates | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Stryker (SYK - Free Report) came out with quarterly earnings of $3.52 per share, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.56 per share. This compares to earnings of $3.19 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.This quarterly report represents an earnings surprise of -1.12%. A quarter ago, it was expected that this medical device maker would post earnings of $3.46 per share when it actually produced earnings of $3.69, delivering a surprise of +6.65%. Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates two times. Stryker, which belongs to the Zacks Medical - Products industry, posted revenues of $6.52 billion for the quarter ended September 2026, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 0.88%. This compares to year-ago revenues of $6.06 billion. The company has topped consensus revenue estimates two times over the last four quarters. The sustainability of the stock's immediate price movement based on the recently-released numbers and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's commentary on the earnings call. Stryker shares have lost about 13.5% since the beginning of the year versus the S&P 500's gain of 13.1%. What's Next for Stryker?While Stryker has underperformed the market so far this year, the question that comes to investors' minds is: what's next for the stock? There are no easy answers to this key question, but one reliable measure that can help investors address this is the company's earnings outlook. Not only does this include current consensus earnings expectations for the coming quarter(s), but also how these expectations have changed lately. Empirical research shows a strong correlation between near-term stock movements and trends in earnings estimate revisions. Investors can track such revisions by themselves or rely on a tried-and-tested rating tool like the Zacks Rank, which has an impressive track record of harnessing the power of earnings estimate revisions. Ahead of this earnings release, the estimate revisions trend for Stryker was unfavorable. While the magnitude and direction of estimate revisions could change following the company's just-released earnings report, the current status translates into a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell) for the stock. So, the shares are expected to underperform the market in the near future. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. It will be interesting to see how estimates for the coming quarters and the current fiscal year change in the days ahead. The current consensus EPS estimate is $5.07 on $7.92 billion in revenues for the coming quarter and $14.93 on $27.08 billion in revenues for the current fiscal year. Investors should be mindful of the fact that the outlook for the industry can have a material impact on the performance of the stock as well. In terms of the Zacks Industry Rank, Medical - Products is currently in the bottom 38% of the 250 plus Zacks industries. Our research shows that the top 50% of the Zacks-ranked industries outperform the bottom 50% by a factor of more than 2 to 1. Perrigo (PRGO - Free Report) , another stock in the same industry, has yet to report results for the quarter ended September 2026. The results are expected to be released on November 4. This drug company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.56 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of -30%. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 0.5% lower over the last 30 days to the current level. Perrigo's revenues are expected to be $990.45 million, down 5.1% from the year-ago quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:40
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:15
2d ago
|
ScottsMiracle-Gro Completes Acquisition of Black Kow to Broaden Leadership in Organic Gardening Solutions | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Black Kow expands to retailers nationwide and launches new organic products for gardeners | Source: Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)MARYSVILLE, Ohio, Oct. 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (NYSE: SMG), home to North America’s leading consumer lawn and garden brands, today announced that it has completed the acquisition of the Black Kow brand from Organics Management. Following a successful licensing partnership established in January 2026, the Company exercised its purchase option to bring Black Kow fully into its core Gardens portfolio. Known for its iconic yellow bag and trusted for generations, Black Kow is the leading brand of naturally composted cow manure and organic soil amendments. By integrating Black Kow into ScottsMiracle-Gro’s expansive manufacturing and distribution network, the acquisition transforms a regional favorite into an accessible brand for gardeners from coast to coast. Strategic Integration Pillars: Driving National Distribution and Product Growth The addition of Black Kow extends ScottsMiracle-Gro’s commitment to organic, regenerative gardening solutions through three core initiatives: Nationwide Retail Availability: Expanding Black Kow’s footprint beyond its traditional eastern U.S. base into retail outlets nationwide.New Ready-to-Use Organic Mixes in fiscal 2027: Thanks to rapid innovation by ScottsMiracle-Gro scientists, launching new, premixed organic potting, raised-bed and in-ground soils powered by Black Kow compost, delivering upon the growing consumer demand for natural gardening solutions.Single-Ingredient Soil Builders: Expanding the portfolio of single-ingredient amendments tailored to DIY growers who prefer to customize their own soil mixes. Financial Impact and Strategic Fit “The Black Kow acquisition is an important milestone in our multi-year SMG 2.0 growth plan,” said Nate Baxter, president and CEO. “It is a testament to our tuck-in M&A strategy, taking a trusted brand with strong consumer loyalty and integrating it seamlessly into our core business. This transaction is expected to improve our leverage ratio and contribute to sales and profitability growth in year one. Black Kow will create sustainable value for our shareholders while meeting growing consumer demand for organic gardening solutions.” Portfolio Synergies with Miracle-Gro Sadie Oldham, vice president and general manager of the Gardens business, added, “I am incredibly excited to lead the integration of Black Kow into our Gardens portfolio. The synergies between our Miracle-Gro and Black Kow brands are undeniable. Black Kow’s heritage as a trusted, natural soil amendment complements the performance-driven nutrition of Miracle-Gro, giving us a highly differentiated product mix. We are uniquely positioned to deliver a complete, premium gardening solution to every type of grower.” About ScottsMiracle-Gro With approximately $3.3 billion in sales, the Company is home to North America’s leading consumer lawn and garden brands. The Company’s brands are among the most recognized in the industry. The Company’s Scotts®, Miracle-Gro®, Ortho® and Tomcat® brands are market-leading in their categories. For additional information, visit us at www.scottsmiraclegro.com. For investor inquiries: Brad Chelton Vice President Treasury, Tax and Investor Relations [email protected] (937) 309-2503 For media inquiries: Tom Matthews Chief Communications Officer [email protected] (937) 844-3864 |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:39
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:10
2d ago
|
Republic Services, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2026 Results | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Reported Earnings Per Share of $1.93 and Adjusted Earnings Per Share of $1.94Generated Year-to-Date Cash Flow from Operations of $3.52 Billion and Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $2.28 BillionInvested Approximately $1.1 Billion in Value-Creating Acquisitions Year-to-DateUpdated Full-Year Financial GuidanceBoard Authorized $5 Billion for Share RepurchasesGreat Place to Work Certification for the 10th Consecutive Year, /PRNewswire/ -- Republic Services, Inc. (NYSE: RSG) today reported net income of $592 million, or $1.93 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2026, versus $550 million, or $1.76 per diluted share, for the comparable 2025 period. Excluding certain expenses and other items, on an adjusted basis, net income for the three months ended September 30, 2026, was $595 million, or $1.94 per diluted share, versus $594 million, or $1.90 per diluted share, for the comparable 2025 period."We delivered strong third quarter results that underscored the resilience of our business model and the effectiveness of our strategy," said Jon Vander Ark, president and chief executive officer. "Positive growth trends across the business and improved performance in Environmental Solutions reinforce our confidence in the opportunities ahead. We remain focused on disciplined pricing, effective cost management and strategic investments that are designed to strengthen our competitive position and create long-term value for our customers and shareholders." Third-Quarter and Year-to-Date 2026 Highlights: Total revenue growth of 8.2 percent includes 4.8 percent organic growth from our recycling and waste business, 2.1 percent growth from our environmental solutions business, and 1.3 percent growth from acquisitions.Core price on total revenue increased revenue by 5.3 percent. Core price on related business revenue increased revenue by 6.3 percent, which consisted of 7.6 percent in the open market and 4.1 percent in the restricted portion of the business.Revenue growth from average yield on total revenue was 2.9 percent, and volume decreased revenue by 0.6 percent. Revenue growth from average yield on related business revenue was 3.5 percent, and volume decreased related business revenue by 0.7 percent.Net income was $592 million, or a margin of 13.0 percent. EPS was $1.93 per share, an increase of 9.7 percent over the prior year.Adjusted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, was $1.94 per share, an increase of 2.1 percent over the prior year.Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was $1.45 billion. Adjusted EBITDA margin, a non-GAAP measure, was 31.8 percent of revenue.Year-to-date cash invested in acquisitions was $1.12 billion.Year-to-date cash returned to shareholders was $1.43 billion, which included $848 million of share repurchases and $577 million of dividends paid.The Company's average recycled commodity price per ton sold at its recycling centers during the third quarter was $142. This represents an increase of $16 per ton over the prior year.Republic was recognized by several leading organizations during the quarter, including:Great Place to Work certification for the 10th consecutive year3BL's 2026 100 Best Corporate Citizens listUpdated Full-Year 2026 Financial Guidance Republic's financial guidance is based on current economic conditions and does not assume any significant changes in the overall economy for the remainder of 2026. Please refer to the Reconciliation of Full-Year 2026 Financial Guidance section of this document for detail relating to the computation of non-GAAP measures as well as the Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements section of this document. The Company updated its revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted free cash flow financial guidance as follows: Revenue: Increased most recent guidance to a range of $17.425 billion to $17.475 billionAdjusted EBITDA: Increased most recent guidance to a range of $5.550 billion to $5.575 billionAdjusted Free Cash Flow: Increased most recent guidance to a range of $2.565 billion to $2.585 billionBoard Authorized $5 Billion for Share Repurchases On October 28, 2026, the Board of Directors approved a $5 billion share repurchase authorization effective January 1, 2027, and extending through December 31, 2029. As of September 30, 2026, the remaining purchase capacity under the prior repurchase authorization was $0.8 billion, which continues through December 31, 2026. Company Declared Quarterly Dividend On October 28, 2026, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.670 per share for shareholders of record on January 4, 2027. The dividend will be paid on January 15, 2027. Presentation of Certain Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Measures Adjusted diluted earnings per share, adjusted net income - Republic, adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted tax impact, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted EBITDA by business type, adjusted EBITDA margin by business type and adjusted free cash flow are described in the Performance Metrics and Reconciliations of Certain Non-GAAP Measures section of this document. About Republic Services Republic Services, Inc. is a leader in the environmental services industry. Through its subsidiaries, the Company provides customers with the most complete set of products and services, including recycling, solid waste, special waste, hazardous waste and field services. Republic's industry-leading commitments to advance circularity and support decarbonization are helping deliver on its vision to partner with customers to create a more sustainable world. For more information, please visit RepublicServices.com. SUPPLEMENTAL UNAUDITED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND OPERATING DATA REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in millions, except per share amounts) September 30, December 31, 2026 2025 (Unaudited) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 92 $ 76 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts and other of $59 and $66, respectively 2,126 1,897 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 460 550 Total current assets 2,678 2,523 Restricted cash and marketable securities 279 259 Property and equipment, net 12,963 12,639 Goodwill 17,330 16,715 Other intangible assets, net 779 655 Other assets 1,483 1,575 Total assets $ 35,512 $ 34,366 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 1,448 $ 1,374 Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 48 596 Deferred revenue 481 496 Accrued landfill and environmental costs, current portion 158 148 Accrued interest 134 109 Other accrued liabilities 1,308 1,205 Total current liabilities 3,577 3,928 Long-term debt, net of current maturities 14,007 12,985 Accrued landfill and environmental costs, net of current portion 2,652 2,608 Deferred income taxes and other long-term tax liabilities, net 2,030 1,884 Insurance reserves, net of current portion 442 436 Other long-term liabilities 564 556 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 50 shares authorized; none issued — — Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 750 shares authorized; 314 and 313 issued including shares held in treasury, respectively 3 3 Additional paid-in capital 1,891 1,833 Retained earnings 12,253 11,161 Treasury stock, at cost; 9 and 5 shares, respectively (1,876) (1,000) Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (33) (29) Total Republic Services, Inc. stockholders' equity 12,238 11,968 Non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiary 2 1 Total stockholders' equity 12,240 11,969 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 35,512 $ 34,366 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in millions, except per share data) Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Revenue $ 4,559 $ 4,212 $ 13,103 $ 12,456 Expenses: Cost of operations 2,663 2,463 7,593 7,226 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 494 459 1,442 1,356 Accretion 30 29 91 85 Selling, general and administrative 447 422 1,316 1,274 Restructuring charges 4 3 10 13 Gain on business divestitures and impairments, net — — (1) — Operating income 921 836 2,652 2,502 Interest expense (157) (143) (459) (428) Loss from unconsolidated equity method investments (48) (57) (158) (72) Interest income 3 2 7 6 Other income, net — 7 31 22 Income before income taxes 719 645 2,073 2,030 Provision for income taxes 126 95 389 435 Net income 593 550 1,684 1,595 Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiary (1) — (1) — Net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. $ 592 $ 550 $ 1,683 $ 1,595 Basic earnings per share attributable to Republic Services, Inc. stockholders: Basic earnings per share $ 1.93 $ 1.76 $ 5.47 $ 5.10 Weighted average common shares outstanding 306.3 311.7 307.6 312.6 Diluted earnings per share attributable to Republic Services, Inc. stockholders: Diluted earnings per share $ 1.93 $ 1.76 $ 5.47 $ 5.10 Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 306.5 312.0 307.8 312.9 Cash dividends per common share $ 0.670 $ 0.625 $ 1.920 $ 1.785 REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 Cash provided by operating activities: Net income $ 1,684 $ 1,595 Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 1,533 1,442 Non-cash interest expense 59 57 Deferred tax provision 119 130 Loss from unconsolidated equity method investments 158 72 Other non-cash items 78 54 Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures: Accounts receivable (254) (78) Prepaid expenses and other assets (49) (93) Accounts payable 176 23 Capping, closure and post-closure expenditures (54) (38) Remediation expenditures (36) (31) Other liabilities 105 182 Cash provided by operating activities 3,519 3,315 Cash used in investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment (1,363) (1,310) Proceeds from sales of property and equipment 9 10 Cash used in acquisitions and investments, net of cash and restricted cash acquired (1,117) (1,259) Cash received from business divestitures 2 7 Other (4) (19) Cash used in investing activities (2,473) (2,571) Cash used in financing activities: Proceeds from credit facilities and notes payable, net of fees 38,330 26,896 Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of discount and fees 1,183 1,183 Payments of credit facilities and notes payable (39,061) (27,639) Issuances of common stock, net (3) (10) Purchases of common stock for treasury (856) (599) Cash dividends paid (577) (544) Distributions paid to non-controlling interests in consolidated subsidiary — (1) Contingent consideration payments (22) (9) Cash used in financing activities (1,006) (723) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash (1) 1 Increase in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents 39 22 Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period 249 203 Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents at end of period $ 288 $ 225 You should read the following information in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025. All amounts below are in millions and as a percentage of our revenue, except per share data. REVENUE The following table reflects our total revenue by line of business for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Collection: Residential $ 782 17.2 % $ 754 17.9 % $ 2,297 17.5 % $ 2,249 18.0 % Small-container 1,379 30.2 1,267 30.1 4,054 30.9 3,768 30.3 Large-container 859 18.9 797 18.9 2,466 18.8 2,330 18.7 Other 19 0.4 17 0.4 54 0.5 53 0.4 Total collection 3,039 66.7 2,835 67.3 8,871 67.7 8,400 67.4 Transfer 510 472 1,444 1,376 Less: intercompany (268) (248) (771) (741) Transfer, net 242 5.3 224 5.3 673 5.1 635 5.1 Landfill 857 845 2,479 2,421 Less: intercompany (341) (329) (993) (968) Landfill, net 516 11.3 516 12.3 1,486 11.3 1,453 11.7 Environmental solutions 544 449 1,435 1,393 Less: intercompany (15) (16) (43) (49) Environmental solutions, net 529 11.6 433 10.3 1,392 10.6 1,344 10.8 Other: Recycling processing and commodity sales 122 2.7 107 2.5 356 2.7 328 2.6 Other non-core 111 2.4 97 2.3 325 2.6 296 2.4 Total other 233 5.1 204 4.8 681 5.3 624 5.0 Total revenue $ 4,559 100.0 % $ 4,212 100.0 % $ 13,103 100.0 % $ 12,456 100.0 % The following table reflects changes in components of our revenue, as a percentage of total revenue, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Average yield 2.9 % 4.0 % 3.2 % 4.2 % Fuel recovery fees 1.8 — 1.3 (0.2) Total price 4.7 4.0 4.5 4.0 Volume (0.6) (0.3) (1.0) (0.4) Change in workdays — — — (0.2) Recycling processing and commodity sales 0.3 (0.2) 0.1 — Environmental solutions 2.1 (1.4) 0.3 (0.7) Other(1) 0.4 (0.4) 0.1 (0.1) Total internal growth 6.9 1.7 4.0 2.6 Acquisitions / divestitures, net 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.3 Total 8.2 % 3.3 % 5.2 % 3.9 % Core price 5.3 % 5.9 % 5.4 % 5.9 % 1) Other represents customer credits recognized in connection with labor disruptions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and the impact of revenue recognized from the related customer contracts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026. Average yield is defined as revenue growth from the change in average price per unit of service, expressed as a percentage. Core price is defined as price increases to our customers and fees, excluding fuel recovery fees, net of price decreases to retain customers. We also measure changes in core price, average yield and volume as a percentage of related-business revenue, defined as total revenue excluding recycled commodities, fuel recovery fees and environmental solutions revenue, to determine the effectiveness of our pricing and organic growth strategies. The following table reflects core price, average yield and volume as a percentage of related-business revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 As a % of Related Business As a % of Related Business Core price 6.3 % 7.2 % 6.5 % 7.2 % Average yield 3.5 % 4.9 % 3.9 % 5.1 % Volume (0.7) % (0.4) % (1.2) % (0.5) % The following table reflects changes in average yield and volume, as a percentage of related business revenue by line of business, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025: Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Yield Volume Yield Volume Yield Volume Yield Volume Collection: Residential 4.3 % (4.3) % 4.4 % (2.4) % 4.5 % (4.6) % 5.0 % (2.9) % Small-container 3.8 % 0.5 % 6.3 % (1.2) % 4.5 % — % 6.2 % (1.1) % Large-container 3.5 % 0.5 % 5.4 % (3.9) % 3.9 % (1.4) % 5.5 % (3.5) % Landfill: Municipal solid waste 5.1 % 0.6 % 5.6 % (3.4) % 5.2 % 1.0 % 5.9 % (3.0) % Construction and demolition waste 2.2 % (38.2) % 3.7 % 45.2 % 3.3 % (33.1) % 3.9 % 36.2 % Special waste — % 6.4 % — % 17.8 % — % 5.0 % — % 15.6 % COST OF OPERATIONS The following table summarizes the major components of our cost of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Labor and related benefits $ 881 19.3 % $ 812 19.3 % $ 2,576 19.7 % $ 2,475 19.9 % Transfer and disposal costs 299 6.6 275 6.5 841 6.4 808 6.5 Maintenance and repairs 398 8.7 384 9.1 1,140 8.7 1,122 9.0 Transportation and subcontract costs 363 8.0 302 7.2 989 7.6 896 7.2 Fuel 180 4.0 120 2.8 475 3.6 349 2.8 Disposal fees and taxes 95 2.1 95 2.3 273 2.1 275 2.2 Landfill operating costs 111 2.4 99 2.3 310 2.4 292 2.3 Risk management 100 2.2 109 2.6 305 2.3 321 2.6 Other 236 5.1 227 5.4 684 5.2 648 5.2 Subtotal 2,663 58.4 2,423 57.5 7,593 58.0 7,186 57.7 Labor disruption — — 40 1.0 — — 40 0.3 Total cost of operations $ 2,663 58.4 % $ 2,463 58.5 % $ 7,593 58.0 % $ 7,226 58.0 % These cost categories may change from time to time and may not be comparable to similarly titled categories used by other companies. As such, you should take care when comparing our cost of operations by cost component to that of other companies and of ours for prior periods. SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES The following table summarizes our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Salaries and related benefits $ 295 6.5 % $ 269 6.4 % $ 889 6.8 % $ 842 6.8 % Provision for doubtful accounts 12 0.3 9 0.2 39 0.3 27 0.2 Other 140 3.0 144 3.4 388 2.9 405 3.2 Total selling, general and administrative expenses $ 447 9.8 % $ 422 10.0 % $ 1,316 10.0 % $ 1,274 10.2 % These cost categories may change from time to time and may not be comparable to similarly titled categories used by other companies. As such, you should take care when comparing our selling, general and administrative expenses by cost component to those of other companies and of ours for prior periods. PERFORMANCE METRICS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF CERTAIN NON-GAAP MEASURES The following tables calculate EBITDA, EBITDA margin, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin by business type, adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted tax impact, adjusted net income - Republic, adjusted diluted earnings per share, and adjusted free cash flow, which are not measures determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025. Our definitions of the foregoing non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin The following table calculates adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue): Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. and net income margin $ 592 13.0 % $ 550 13.1 % $ 1,683 12.8 % $ 1,595 12.8 % Net income attributable to non- controlling interests 1 — 1 — Provision for income taxes 126 95 389 435 Other income, net — (7) (31) (22) Interest income (3) (2) (7) (6) Interest expense 157 143 459 428 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 494 459 1,442 1,356 Accretion 30 29 91 85 EBITDA and EBITDA margin $ 1,397 30.6 % $ 1,267 30.1 % $ 4,027 30.7 % $ 3,871 31.1 % Loss from unconsolidated equity method investments 48 57 158 72 Restructuring charges 4 3 10 13 Gain on business divestitures and impairments, net — — (1) — Labor disruption — 56 — 56 Total adjustments 52 116 167 141 Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin $ 1,449 31.8 % $ 1,383 32.8 % $ 4,194 32.0 % $ 4,012 32.2 % Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin by Business Type The following table summarizes revenue, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin by business type for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars and adjusted EBITDA margin as a percentage of revenue): Three Months Ended September 30, 2026 Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 Recycling & Waste Environmental Solutions(b) Total Recycling & Waste Environmental Solutions Total Revenue $ 4,030 $ 529 $ 4,559 $ 3,779 $ 433 $ 4,212 Adjusted EBITDA(a) $ 1,315 $ 134 $ 1,449 $ 1,292 $ 91 $ 1,383 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 32.6 % 25.4 % 31.8 % 34.2 % 21.0 % 32.8 % Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Recycling & Waste Environmental Solutions(b) Total Recycling & Waste Environmental Solutions(b) Total Revenue $ 11,711 $ 1,392 $ 13,103 $ 11,112 $ 1,344 $ 12,456 Adjusted EBITDA(a) $ 3,890 $ 304 $ 4,194 $ 3,714 $ 298 $ 4,012 Adjusted EBITDA Margin 33.2 % 21.9 % 32.0 % 33.4 % 22.1 % 32.2 % (a) Certain corporate expenses, including selling, general and administrative expenses, and National Accounts revenue are allocated to the two business types.(b) Adjusted EBITDA Margin does not calculate due to rounding. The amounts shown for Recycling & Waste represent the sum of our Group 1 and Group 2 reportable segments, and Environmental Solutions represents our Group 3 reportable segment. Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share The following table calculates adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted tax impact, adjusted net income - Republic, and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars except per share data): Three Months Ended September 30, 2026 Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 Diluted Diluted Net Earnings Net Earnings Pre-tax Tax Income - per Pre-tax Tax Income - per Income Impact(1) Republic Share Income Impact(1) Republic Share As reported $ 719 $ 127 $ 592 $ 1.93 $ 645 $ 95 $ 550 $ 1.76 Restructuring charges 4 1 3 0.01 3 1 2 0.01 Labor disruption — — — — 56 14 42 0.13 Gain on business divestitures and impairments, net — — — — — — — — Total adjustments 4 1 3 0.01 59 15 44 0.14 As adjusted $ 723 $ 128 $ 595 $ 1.94 $ 704 $ 110 $ 594 $ 1.90 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Diluted Diluted Net Earnings Net Earnings Pre-tax Tax Income - per Pre-tax Tax Income - per Income Impact(1) Republic Share Income Impact(1) Republic Share As reported $ 2,073 $ 390 $ 1,683 $ 5.47 $ 2,030 $ 435 $ 1,595 $ 5.10 Restructuring charges 10 2 8 0.02 13 4 9 0.03 Labor disruption — — — — 56 14 42 0.13 Gain on business divestitures and impairments, net(2) (1) — (1) — — — — — Total adjustments 9 2 7 0.02 69 18 51 0.16 As adjusted $ 2,082 $ 392 $ 1,690 $ 5.49 $ 2,099 $ 453 $ 1,646 $ 5.26 (1) The income tax effect related to our adjustments includes both current and deferred income tax impact and is individually calculated based on the statutory rates applicable to each adjustment.(2) The aggregate impact to adjusted diluted earnings per share totals to less than $0.01 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026. We believe that presenting EBITDA and EBITDA margin is useful to investors because they provide important information concerning our operating performance exclusive of certain non-cash and other costs. EBITDA and EBITDA margin demonstrate our ability to execute our financial strategy, which includes reinvesting in existing capital assets to ensure a high level of customer service, investing in capital assets to facilitate growth in our customer base and services provided, maintaining our investment grade credit ratings and minimizing debt, paying cash dividends, repurchasing our common stock, and maintaining and improving our market position through business optimization. Although depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion are considered operating costs in accordance with U.S. GAAP, they represent the allocation of non-cash costs generally associated with long-lived assets acquired or constructed in prior years. We believe that presenting adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted EBITDA margin by business type, adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted tax impact, adjusted net income - Republic, and adjusted diluted earnings per share provide an understanding of operational activities before the financial impact of certain items. We use these measures, and believe investors will find them helpful, in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period. We have incurred comparable charges, costs and recoveries in prior periods, and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods. Restructuring charges. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, we incurred restructuring charges of $4 million and $10 million, respectively, and during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, we incurred restructuring charges of $3 million and $13 million, respectively. The charges in these periods related primarily to the design and implementation of our new accounts receivable system. Labor disruption. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, we experienced labor disruptions in certain isolated markets. The impact of these labor disruptions during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $56 million, including $16 million of customer credits and $40 million of cost of operations. Gain on business divestitures and impairments, net. During the nine months ended September 30, 2026, we recorded a net gain on business divestitures and impairments of $1 million. Adjusted Free Cash Flow The following table calculates our adjusted free cash flow, which is not a measure determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars): Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 Cash provided by operating activities $ 3,519 $ 3,315 Property and equipment received (1,259) (1,183) Proceeds from sales of property and equipment 9 10 Restructuring payments, net of tax 7 7 Labor disruption, net of tax — 42 Adjusted free cash flow $ 2,276 $ 2,191 We believe that presenting adjusted free cash flow provides useful information regarding our recurring cash provided by operating activities after certain expenditures or recoveries. It also demonstrates our ability to execute our financial strategy and is a key metric we use to determine compensation. The presentation of adjusted free cash flow has material limitations. Adjusted free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed, such as debt service requirements and dividend payments. Purchases of property and equipment as reflected on our consolidated statements of cash flows represent amounts paid during the period for such expenditures. A reconciliation of property and equipment expenditures reflected on our consolidated statements of cash flows to property and equipment received during the period follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in millions of dollars): Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 Purchases of property and equipment per the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows $ 1,363 $ 1,310 Adjustments for property and equipment received in a different period (104) (127) Property and equipment received during the period $ 1,259 $ 1,183 The adjustments noted above do not affect our net change in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents as reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE As of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, accounts receivable were $2,126 million and $1,897 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 million and $66 million, respectively, resulting in days sales outstanding of 42.4, or 32.8 days net of deferred revenue, compared to 41.8, or 30.8 days net of deferred revenue, respectively. CASH DIVIDENDS In July 2026, we paid a cash dividend of $191 million to shareholders of record as of July 2, 2026. As of September 30, 2026, we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $205 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on October 2, 2026, which was paid on October 15, 2026. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM During the three months ended September 30, 2026, we repurchased 0.9 million shares of our common stock for $197 million at a weighted average cost per share of $215.18. As of September 30, 2026, the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our October 2023 repurchase program was approximately $0.8 billion. RECONCILIATION OF FULL-YEAR 2026 FINANCIAL GUIDANCE Adjusted EBITDA The following is a summary of our anticipated adjusted EBITDA, which is not a measure determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the year ending December 31, 2026 (in millions of dollars): (Anticipated) Year Ending December 31, 2026 Net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. $ 2,210 - 2,220 Provision for income taxes 520 - 525 Other income, net (30) Interest expense, net 610 Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 2,025 - 2,035 Loss from unconsolidated equity method investments 200 Restructuring charges 15 Adjusted EBITDA $ 5,550 - 5,575 We believe that presenting adjusted EBITDA provides an understanding of operational activities before the financial impact of certain items. We use this measure, and believe investors will find it helpful, in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period. We have incurred comparable charges, costs and recoveries in prior periods, and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods. Our definition of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. Adjusted Free Cash Flow Our anticipated adjusted free cash flow, which is not a measure determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the year ending December 31, 2026, is calculated as follows (in millions of dollars): (Anticipated) Year Ending December 31, 2026 Cash provided by operating activities $ 4,510 - 4,570 Property and equipment received (1,970) - (2,010) Proceeds from sales of property and equipment 10 Restructuring payments, net of tax 15 Adjusted free cash flow $ 2,565 - 2,585 We believe that presenting adjusted free cash flow provides useful information regarding our recurring cash provided by operating activities after certain expenditures or recoveries. It also demonstrates our ability to execute our financial strategy and is a key metric we use to determine compensation. The presentation of adjusted free cash flow has material limitations. Adjusted free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed, such as debt service requirements and dividend payments. Our definition of adjusted free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies. Our financial guidance is based on current economic conditions and does not assume any significant changes in the overall economy for the remainder of 2026. INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release contains certain forward-looking information about us that is intended to be covered by the safe harbor for "forward-looking statements" provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. Words such as "guidance," "expect," "will," "may," "anticipate," "plan," "estimate," "project," "intend," "should," "can," "likely," "could," "outlook" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements include information about our plans, strategies, and expectations of future financial performance and prospects. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of our management and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations may not prove to be correct. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements are the impacts of the overall global economy and changing interest rates, impacts from international trade restrictions and tariffs, our ability to effectively integrate and manage companies we acquire, and to realize the anticipated benefits of any such acquisitions, the impact of prolonged work stoppages or other labor disruptions, the amount of the financial contribution of our sustainability initiatives, acts of war, riots or terrorism, and the impact of these acts on economic, financial and social conditions in the United States and Canada, as well as our dependence on large, long-term collection, transfer and disposal contracts. More information on factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated is included from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, particularly under Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors. Additionally, new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such risk factors, or to assess the impact such risk factors might have on our business. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. SOURCE Republic Services, Inc. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:39
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:57
2d ago
|
Republic Servs Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Republic Servs (NYSE:RSG) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company's third-quarter earnings call has been provided below. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:20
2d ago
|
Coinbase snaps losing streak with third-quarter profit on crypto trading rebound | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The Coinbase logo on a smartphone screen in this illustration taken November 3, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tabOct 29 (Reuters) - Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global (COIN.O), opens new tab returned to profitability on Thursday after three consecutive quarters of losses, aided by lower operating expenses and investment gains on crypto assets that offset weaker trading activity. The results underscore the company's continued exposure to swings in crypto asset prices, with gains in the value of its investment portfolio helping boost earnings even as challenging market conditions weighed on trading volumes and transaction revenue, its largest source of income. Sign up here. Transaction revenue dropped 43% to $590.2 million in the third quarter, from $1.05 billion a year earlier. Shares of the crypto exchange were down 2.55% in trading after the bell. The stock has declined nearly 29% since the start of this year. The company said macro headwinds have begun to shift and crypto prices rebounded in September. Prediction markets emerged as another area of growth for Coinbase during the reported quarter, with revenue exceeding $200 million. The expansion also reflects its strategy of diversifying revenue streams beyond its core transaction business, which remains heavily dependent on crypto-market activity. "They (Coinbase) also treat the category (prediction markets) as near-term revenue, with derivatives as the longer bet," said Colby Howard, president of Heron Events at Heron Intelligence. "They also see prediction markets as a way in, with traders who start making money moving up to the paid tier." Total operating expenses in the third quarter fell about 17% to $1.15 billion, compared with $1.39 billion in the prior year. Revenue at the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange fell about 35% to $1.22 billion in the third quarter. The company reported a profit of $718.7 million, or $2.51 per share, for the quarter ended September 30, compared with $432.6 million, or $1.50 per share, a year earlier. Reporting by Rishab Shaju and Prakhar Srivastava in Bengaluru; Editing by Pooja Desai Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:25
2d ago
|
Coinbase net income surges 66% in third quarter, benefiting from bitcoin investment gains | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Coinbase Global earned third-quarter adjusted net income of $719 million, up 66% from $433 million a year ago, largely due to a recovery in the cryptocurrency market.Coinbase said it earned $2.51 a share in the latest quarter, although it wasn't immediately clear if that compared with the 6-cent-per-share profit that Wall Street analysts had estimated. Revenue of $1.20 billion trailed the $1.233 billion expected by analysts polled by LSEG. Net income at the San Francisco-based platform surged thanks to the value of its volatile cryptocurrency investment portfolio, which can swing wildly even when the composition of the underlying holdings are little changed. The third quarter value of Coinbase's crypto investment portfolio climbed due to a resurgence in the digital asset market. The price of bitcoin — often used as a gauge for all crypto assets — rose 39% in the three-month period ended Sept. 30 and the flagship cryptocurrency recently changed hands at roughly $80,809. Building beyond bitcoin In the third quarter, Coinbase deepened its push into non-crypto products and services, including artificial intelligence integrations for traders, tokenized real-world assets and prediction markets. In July, VP of product Max Branzburg told CNBC that Coinbase would debut an "everything exchange" spotlighting tokenized stocks and other real-world assets, derivatives trading, prediction markets and early-stage token sales. The trading platform also introduced Coinbase for Agents in early October, supporting users that want to use ChatGPT, Muse or other AI agents to manage their portfolios or research and trade various assets. Coinbase also expanded its prediction market offerings, making a wider range of event contracts available to users. In the third quarter, prediction markets revenue grew to more than $200 million on an annual basis, while the number of traders on those markets increased 60% compared with the second quarter. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:37
2d ago
|
Coinbase Global Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Coinbase Global (NASDAQ:COIN) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation. View the webcast at https://www.youtube.com/live/sWu_H4FY4A4 SummaryCoinbase Global reported stable revenue quarter-over-quarter despite a 10% decline in crypto spot trading volumes, driven by the growth in prediction markets which reached $200 million in annualized run-rate revenue. The company has been actively diversifying its revenue streams, with subscription and services contributing to 49% of total net revenues, and initiatives like prediction markets and derivatives now comprising 25% of transaction revenue. Coinbase is focusing on expanding its everything-exchange model, integrating crypto, AI, and traditional financial services, while emphasizing its role in the stablecoin ecosystem, particularly through its partnership with Circle on USDC. The acquisition of Deribit positions Coinbase to unify global liquidity in crypto options and futures, with plans to relaunch Coinbase Pro, indicating a strategic push in institutional trading. Management stressed the importance of building a decentralized financial system and highlighted ongoing efforts in enhancing security measures against potential AI and quantum threats. Full TranscriptOPERATOR (Moderator) Our discussion today includes forward-looking statements which may vary materially from our actual results. Please refer to our SEC filings and earnings presentation for information concerning risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause these results to differ. In addition, our discussion today includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided in the earnings presentation on our investor relations website. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Hi everyone, thanks for joining us live on X. I’m Alicia Haas, CFO of Coinbase, and I’m here with our co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong and a few independent and institutional research analysts. If you haven’t already, please head over to our IR website to watch the videos we posted of Brian and me discussing our quarterly results. But in this session right now, we are excited to directly connect with you, our customers, our community, our shareholders. And we want to talk about our quarter and answer questions. So just as a friendly reminder, we’re not going to answer any questions on When XYZ token. We have a robust asset listing process that we follow, and we’re not going to talk about any customer support cases. But aside from those simple ground rules, it is open question time. So first up I’d like to introduce Andrew. Andrew Jeffrey (Analyst at William Blair) Thank you very much, Alicia and Brian, it’s a pleasure to be here. Appreciate the opportunity. I thought maybe I’d start with a big picture macro question, and I think you touched on it in the quarterly results. It does feel like crypto sentiment has shifted and we’ve seen Bitcoin rally a lot off of its lows, but it still trades like a risk asset—even aftermarket today with tech trading on. Do you feel like the case for Bitcoin ownership broadly has evolved? It does seem to me like that base has certainly made the case that Bitcoin can really be global digital collateral in DeFi marketplaces. But can you maybe just comment on how you think sort of the raison d’être may have shifted? Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) And before you answer, Brian, I just wanted to apologize—Andrew, I should have given you a more robust introduction. With us folks is Andrew Jeffrey, who is an institutional research analyst with William Blair. And with that, Brian, over to you. What is the BTC value proposition today in 2026? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, so I think it’s evolving. You’re right, it’s obviously still store of value. We’re super bullish on Bitcoin. I think we just purchased our 18,000th Bitcoin actually on Coinbase balance sheet. Alicia has a bitcoin. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Happy birthday. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, it’s Bitcoin’s birthday coming up too. And then I think what you’re getting at is correct, which is now that you can use Bitcoin as collateral, it actually improves liquidity for trading, right? So that’s improving DEX trading, for instance, with Bitcoin. A lot of our customers who were early in Bitcoin, they don’t want to ever sell their Bitcoin, but they do want to use it as collateral. And Base, for instance, has done really well recently by growing its financing product. So you can use that Bitcoin as collateral, get financing, go and do more trading. It’s pretty synergistic and I think that’s definitely a big trend that’s happening right now. And then just broadly, I’d say in this cycle that we’re in, it’s always difficult to call these things exactly. But we are seeing volumes rebounding and more institutions coming and onboarding. And so yeah, I think it’s an exciting road ahead for Bitcoin. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Yeah. I would just comment that we saw significant ETF inflows into Bitcoin specifically this quarter as people recognized that the price had stabilized. And one, Bitcoin is still a critical asset to us, but we are Bitcoin and people can now trade a lot of things. And we’ve seen volatility come down in Bitcoin with the institutional adoption of this as an asset class. And I think that that is providing it to be an important diversification in a lot of people’s investment portfolios. Andrew Jeffrey (Analyst at William Blair) Thank you. Mine included. I guess I’m not vain enough to have introduced myself. I probably should promote myself better. I actually think the comment on diversification and thinking about your business in particular is really a good segue. Terrific sequential growth in prediction market revenue. One of the questions we get a lot is the trends in consumer transaction revenue and take rate—I’m sure you hear this a lot too. Could you help us parse a little bit? It certainly looks like prediction markets cushioned consumer transaction revenue in the quarter. But can you help us sort of unpack that a little bit and tell us maybe how we can think about that going forward? Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Absolutely. So prediction markets is one of our fastest growing new revenue products. We just launched in February this year, and during the third quarter it crossed $200 million of annualized run-rate revenue. And what’s great about that is this is a market where overall spot crypto trading was actually down. We saw overall crypto spot trading volume down 10% quarter-over-quarter. And so the growth in prediction markets offset the decline in overall spot trading and we delivered flat revenue quarter-over-quarter, though the mix shifted considerably. And when we look at the mix of our overall revenue, it’s really interesting to look at this quarter: predictions plus derivatives. So those two combined were 25% of our total transaction revenue. And if I look at then our total revenue, subscription and services was roughly 49% of total net revenues. So we are seeing the investments that we’ve made over the past few years to really diversify our revenue really come to our benefit. As I love what Brian says, there’s always a market somewhere. And so people are shifting their trading behavior to the asset that’s most interesting and most exciting in the markets that they want to trade in. And what we saw right now in this quarter, a lot of that was around predictions. But I also want to share with you, this isn’t cannibalizing our spot trading. What we’re seeing is all incremental. And when we look at our trading profile, people are still continuing to trade spot, just maybe at a lesser level than they did in past quarters. And they’re putting incremental dollars to trade in prediction markets and derivatives. So really these are additive to our product offering right now. Andrew Jeffrey (Analyst at William Blair) Which goes a long way, I think, toward debunking the idea that Bitcoin’s the tail that wags the dog—although I think that still seems to inform stock prices at least in the short term. There’s a ton to talk about. I did want to spend a little time on stablecoins, moving away from transaction. Could you just elaborate for us a bit on your Circle relationship? To me, it seems very much like a co-opetition situation. Both companies—whereas USDC is still primary to yield Coinbase Global efforts—it does seem like both companies are building similar stablecoin movement infrastructure. Can you talk about perhaps where your efforts overlap with Circle’s and where your efforts are distinct? Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Brian, do you want me to start here and then you can add on? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, go for it. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) All right. Well, we are proud to be a co-founder of USDC and we’re very committed to growing USDC, and we also want to support other high-quality regulated stablecoins. And so you saw that we also partnered, for example, with OUSD. We also have PYUSD on our platform. We will be supporting our customers in whatever asset they want to trade and whatever asset they want to transact with in crypto. So we think about ourselves as asset-agnostic that way. But because of our commercial relationship with Circle, where we have a strong economic interest to grow USDC, we are active in supporting this overall USDC ecosystem. Coinbase focuses on distribution, the customer relationships, the infrastructure, and really deeply integrating USDC and opportunities to use stablecoins in transaction flows within our products. This means that we are using this collateral with our derivatives exchange, as an example. This means that we are looking to put—we put USDC on Base to really augment our payments with our Coinbase developer product. And as a result we’ve seen all-time highs in USDC use on our platform. So we capture about 50% of the overall economics. We hold about 30% of total USDC in circulation as assets on our platform, and we’ve seen the total assets on our platform grow for five sequential quarters—or it’s just been more than that now, it’s just been significantly growing on our platform for now many, many quarters. Where we compete is we’re both building stablecoin payment infrastructure, and so we will compete in some areas, but we are both incentivized to grow total USDC market cap and be deeply embedded in the overall network of stablecoin usage around the world. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I guess I’d just add that, you know, we really enjoy our partnership with Circle. There are many times where we work together on certain efforts. You’re right that we are both building infrastructure. It’s going to take a lot of work from lots of companies to go update the financial system. And so I think that that’s great what they’re doing and we’re going to keep doing our piece of it as well. And overall what we want to see is just stablecoins be a larger and larger percentage of global GDP for payments in, you know, everywhere—used in every country of the world. So we’re going to keep working with them on that. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) All right, let’s go to our next guest. We have John Ma from Artemis with us. John, over to you. John Ma (Analyst at Artemis) Thank you. Hey, Alicia—Drew, thank you for your questions too. Happy early 18th birthday for Bitcoin. That’s very exciting. I hope someone out there is going to have a Halloween Bitcoin costume. I’ll start looking for that on social media. I’m really excited to talk about Coinbase and getting your thoughts. So one of our engineers, Crystal, she built automase.dev, she was a big Base developer. We recently integrated Coinbase MCP trading agents into Artemis and she said of all the brokerages she worked with, it was the easiest. And so my question is, what could go right for Coinbase agents? Because it’s the only MCP that includes x402 prediction markets, equities, and crypto. What could go right from here? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, well, thanks for using our MCP. You know, we launched this product called Coinbase Agents a little while back and it’s basically an easy way to connect any third-party agent to your Coinbase account. And we really want to make Coinbase the most AI-enabled financial account out there for trading and payments, borrowing. So we’ve been putting a lot of work into that MCP API and honestly it’s been really exciting. I mean, the agentic trading volume is growing something like 20% week over week right now, which is just shocking. I mean, these numbers. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Early days, early days. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, they’re still… The numbers in this grand scheme of things are still relatively small compared to our other trading volume. But to me it’s a clear indication of where things are going. And I’m just like, I’m just incredibly excited about the TAM for what the agentic economy could be. I mean, you asked what could go right? I think probably like you, we’re seeing this trend and thinking, okay, there’s going to be more and more agents in the economy getting work done on our behalf. They are going to have to pay for things, goods and services to get work done, or go shopping for us. They’re going to have to, in a business context, you know, they’re going to have to pay for vendors and services to not get stuck at these paywalls. Just like you would give an expense account to an employee or a budget to a certain team. This is very clear to us that they’re going to need their own financial infrastructure and they’re going to do it for trading too. It’s not just payments. And so what does this mean? I mean, they’re going to need to have accounts with good controls and permissions to make sure you’re managing their spending and all that. And I think that it’s hard to imagine a world where there’s not more AI agents than humans at some point in this economy. So the agentic economy is going to be massive. And I think it’s just one of these opportunities where, frankly, we see the legacy players being a little bit hesitant about this and saying, I don’t know, this is scary. What if these rogue agents do something unexpected? We’re not going to let any of these things touch our accounts. I kind of feel the opposite. It’s an opportunity. If we can lean in and build this in a very safe and trusted way, which is what Coinbase is known for using these frontier technologies, AI and crypto, which, by the way, they go really well together. That’s just a huge opportunity for us to capture more and more market share as the most AI-enabled financial account. So we’re all in on this. It’s what I wake up thinking about a lot these days. Tamil Yeah, Brian. It gets me really excited because right before the earnings call, I was using the Coinbase MCP to sell some Polkadot. I bought some ServiceNow stock, I sold down some USDC to buy another stock. And it was like the only product where everything’s all in one place. And so something I’d be curious about is, Coinbase is already number one in crypto market share for spot in the US. How do we go from here to number one across all assets, Everything Exchange? Because this does feel very unique in a world where every retail, every user just uses Coinbase for all their different assets because it’s the only place where their agent could access all these different assets in one place. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, I mean, I think you’re right. It gets to what Alicia was saying earlier about diversification. A lot of these new bets that we made as part of the Everything Exchange investment over the past year have really started to bear fruit now: prediction markets, derivatives, because historically we’ve been overweight on spot crypto trading, which was down quarter for quarter. I don’t think that this is widely understood yet. And the facts on the ground are actually looking a lot better than it’s showing up, maybe in the overall numbers, which are more flat-ish. But yeah, it makes sense to me that if you have an account where you could do all these things in one place—trading, payments, lending—because many of these are synergistic, you might want to have a margin account to do more trading, or you might, as a business, you might want to do FX trading as you’re receiving payments. So we believe that all of these things are going to need to work in one account. We did this with crypto, we can now do it with AI. I think this could be a massive source of new demand for our products. So, yeah, that’s definitely a very exciting moment. And I’ll tell you one other fun anecdote, which is, so in Coinbase for agents, initially we were going around talking to customers and just, hey, what would you like to see in it? And building some of those features? One of the engineers on our team, they put an endpoint into the Coinbase MCP that is like a feedback endpoint. And so now all day long as agents are using it, the agents are actually sending us feedback, and I feel like hundreds of messages are just coming into Slack every day that are like different things that they want to see, and a lot of those get turned into pull requests and now they’re live back in production like a day later. So it’s starting to get to that kind of recursive self-improvement type feeling. Since that pattern was so successful, we’re going to think about putting some of that for our internal APIs as well, just so that, because we’re using lots of agents internally as well, every API can be agentified, so to speak. Tamil Yeah, Brian, I think folks were wondering, I think Jesse mentioned that you and Jesse were shipping like 44 PRs over a day, and maybe you were responding to the agents that were giving feedback about the agent MCP. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) That’s been part of it, yeah. I mean, I’ve definitely been getting excited to go back and write some code. I mean, it’s really the agents writing most of it. But starting my career as an engineer, you get a little rusty in the code the more CEO stuff you do. But yeah, it’s definitely a fun moment. I think we’re living through this kind of golden age, and AI is changing lots of things, but it’s now starting to really change financial services, and that’s been the biggest opportunity for us. And the level of productivity—I think code quality can actually go up as the velocity goes up. We’re seeing that as well on the cyber front, and the number of bugs and incidents and reliability can get better. So it’s massively up-leveling our internal systems, and then we can go build this infrastructure and provide it for all of our customers. To me, this is the future of financial services. I feel like we want to bring frontier technologies like crypto and AI to financial services, and I think we’re the best company in the world that’s set up to do that. Tamil Love that. OPERATOR (Moderator) All right, well, thank you, John, for these questions. Thank you for feedback on the products as well. We love it when people give us feedback. So next up we’d like to introduce Lorenzo Valente from ARC and hand it over to you to ask some questions, Lorenzo. Lorenzo Valente (Analyst at ARC) Alicia. Hey Brian, thanks for taking these questions. Excited to do this. Maybe I’ll start with just a question on security and custody in general. There’s growing concern out there that AI could discover new algos that break crypto ECDSA in general. How does that change the security and custody setup? And are you accelerating the post-quantum roadmap? So just like a question in terms of custody and security in general, how you guys are thinking about that? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, sure. Okay. So I think there’s really two separate things to look at. One is the AI, the trends that we’re seeing of them coming out with new math proofs and security things. Then there’s the quantum question. So these are actually pretty different. I think that when it comes to ECDSA and this elliptic curve cryptography, I’m actually not too worried about AI creating a risk there. There’s been something like, you know, a 40-year track record actually of people attempting new algorithms to try to make this, you know, easier to break, and they’ve basically made zero progress. And it’s, you know, you have to—it requires this brute forcing of, you know, a 256-bit number. So it’s not one of these problems that I don’t think AI is going to be able to chip away at it now. Now quantum is a different story, I think. Quantum, you know, it requires a new type of computer to be built and actually to do it at scale, not just like a theoretical one with a couple of qubits. And so I think that’s more of a matter of when, not if. Like, I think eventually a big enough quantum computer will get made that starts to make this stuff a real issue. So the quantum one, I think, is the more serious one to look at here and to get ready for this. I mean, we’re doing a handful of things. One is we have begun to work to upgrade our custody to be post-quantum. So that’s important. Now, of course, we also need the blockchains themselves to be upgraded and to be quantum resistant. And I know lots of the different blockchains are all working on this. Some of them have published their roadmap. You know, one thing, we’ve been participating as best we can on the Bitcoin side. There’s an advisory council for Bitcoin around post-quantum that had a really good meeting that we attended a few months ago at Stanford, with Dan Boneh leading that along with a number of other folks. And that was a really great conversation that just got a lot of the people together in the room. And I know that the community has put out some of these Bitcoin Improvement Proposals like BIP-360, and there’s others. And so, yeah, I mean, my hope is that the Bitcoin community will essentially find a path over the coming couple of quarters to start to coalesce around some of these proposals that are out there. And that one I think, you know, it’s not imminent. I don’t think it’s going to happen imminently, but I do think it’s always good to be proactive and start to get ahead of these things. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) I just wanted to add on and share that in 2022 we acquired a team of some of the foremost cryptography experts. And this is a space, both on the quantum and on the AI side, that we are monitoring very carefully internally and being really vigilant in investing resources to harden both our own ecosystem as well as work in partnership with the community, as Brian shared. Lorenzo Valente (Analyst at ARC) Perfect, thanks. Shifting to the tokenized stocks on Base—I know it’s still very early, obviously. Is the Base sequencer fee the main revenue driver going forward, or are you looking at other monetization plans? And just to add to that, we’re seeing just a lot of different equities tokenized by several exchanges. How do you see that fragmentation going forward and how do you think about it? Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Great questions, Lorenzo. So yes, sequencer fees are the direct monetization point for tokenized equities today. And our main opportunity then is the utility of the assets once they’re tokenized. And as we kind of expand out and build this network and build liquidity, we can explore different ways to monetize. But network effect is key, liquidity is key. And that is the answer to your question on we’re seeing a lot of places tokenize equities. We see a lot of stablecoins. But what is easy actually is to tokenize something—and I don’t mean that the wrong way—but getting the tokenized asset is not the complicated part. Building depth of liquidity, building network effect, that is the hard part. And we’re really proud that we’re one of the firms, with partnership with Circle, that has really built that with the USDC ecosystem as an example. And so we feel like we have the skills, we have the tools to build liquid, deep markets around these tokenized equities. And that is what we’re doing. We’ve already seen 3 billion, for example, tokenized on Base in tokenized equity trading volume since launch of that product for our non-US customers. We’re just getting started here. But the key is building network effect. And I do think that what we’ll see then over time is things will coalesce, and you’ll see more and more market share gained by the best pricing and the best network effect and liquidity offered in these exchanges. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah. Only thing I’ll add to that is that we took the time to do this in a thoughtful way, which means that these tokenized equities that we put out, they’re real-deal securities. You can get the upside from dividends, we’re implementing voting rights, things like that. So there are other things in the market that are more like synthetics or derivatives that give you exposure to it. But we thought it was important to do it in a way that it’s a real security, you know, it can be redeemed for the underlying asset, et cetera. And I think just as the largest custodian in crypto, the most trusted brand in crypto, this is actually something that we’re uniquely good at and have a right to win. So, yeah, I’m excited about tokenized equities. OPERATOR (Moderator) Thanks. Thanks, Lorenzo. We’re going to go to our last analyst today and I’d like to introduce Ansom, who is the host of Market Poll, to ask us a few questions. Ansom (Host of Market Poll) Hey, how are you guys doing? Thanks for having me on. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, thanks for being here. Ansom (Host of Market Poll) Yeah, so it’s cool, actually. I bought my first Bitcoin on Coinbase back in 2017, so this is crazy for me. But I know you guys are trying to verticalize a lot of the stack as a financial application from spot trading, prediction markets, stablecoin interest, and also institutional trading. But there are also a lot of other companies that are trying to do the same thing. How do you guys differentiate in those plans from your competitors? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, it’s a great question. So I do think you’re right. There are more and more coming together around this everything-exchange idea. I think it depends which competitor you’re talking about, right. So there’s going to be some folks that I think they’re not going to lean into this kind of frontier technology, whether it’s crypto or AI or perps and prediction markets. And so some of the more traditional players are probably not going to have all these on one platform with a good, let’s say, agentic trading interface. I think if you look at some of the more tech-forward ones, it depends. I think you have to look at, on the surface they might look similar, but Coinbase is trying to do something a little different than I think the others, which is we’re not trying to just bring a bunch of people to Wall Street or something. We’re trying to make a new decentralized financial system that doesn’t need Wall Street and can reach the billions of people that the old system didn’t really serve. So I think there’s going to be strengths and weaknesses of each of the players, including us. I think that some of the areas where we’re going to be a little stronger are on the crypto infrastructure side, because that more is in line with our mission, right. And so things like Base have just a really large developer on-chain ecosystem around it. We co-founded UB, we created the X402 protocol for agentic commerce. We have really good decentralized exchange integrations. And I’d say one other advantage that Coinbase has is we actually serve not just consumers, but we also serve institutions. We have a developer infrastructure product that we sell. I think it’s a little easier to run a business that has just one customer, but it’s actually a lot more powerful if you can build the right platform to serve multiple customer types, which we’ve been investing in that platform for a number of years now. I think it’s really starting to give us leverage and to amortize, build something once in an excellent way. We can now launch it across multiple customers, actually bring all of these customers to, let’s say, a new asset or market on our exchange. And it’s retail, it’s institutional, it’s businesses, it’s developers from third parties are now all plugging into that. Those are some of the things we’re focused on. Actually, if I could put in one more real quick, I’d say that still the majority of financial services is running on the financial system. It’s probably 90, 95%, depends how you estimate it. And all fintech companies combined are probably, say, 5 to 10% of the financial services revenue, which is a massive, massive percentage of GDP. And so the real opportunity, I think, is for the tech-enabled fintechs to keep going and capture that other 90 or 95% of the market and create net new demand from these new categories like agentic finance. So that’s really our opportunity and we’re going to do our best to compete, but we’re also create new markets and go capture. Ansom (Host of Market Poll) Awesome. I definitely love the points about the decentralized financial system. I know you guys recently acquired Deribit with your focus more on the institutional side of things. How [is] the growth of that product, the perpetual futures and the options, and how has your plans with that shifted with the recent shift and more of a positive regulatory environment in the U.S.? Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, so we acquired Deribit, which was the largest crypto options trading platform out there, and we’ve made really good progress now integrating it into our existing products. So, you know, we’ve got now this unified, regulated global platform that processes everything — perps, options, futures. We’re making Deribit now available to both US and ex-US. So I think we’re one of the only companies that can unify the global liquidity. You know, historically this was fragmented across all the offshore stuff, non-US, and then in the US had a different world. We’re now unifying much of this, and so it’s been a huge benefit for us acquiring Deribit. We’ve said publicly we’re going to actually relaunch our advanced trader platform under the Coinbase Pro brand. So Coinbase Pro is coming back, and you’re right, the regulatory front has gotten a lot better as well. I think we’re seeing really tailwinds from that — not just with the Genius Act that became law, but the SEC and CFTC have been very forward-thinking and collaborative between the two agencies to get more of this stuff available in the U.S. They want to see the U.S. win and so do we. Ansom (Host of Market Poll) As far as the Coinbase Pro product I used to use when it was GDAX back in the day. So is that going to come back? I think that’s a lot on, like, the regulatory stuff in D.C., but I feel like you guys haven’t done as much on, like, the consumer retail marketing side. I know it seems like a lot of the exchanges that focused heavily on that turned out to be not having the best practices behind the scenes. But I’m curious if you guys have plans to do more marketing along that front to kind of target a different consumer or different customer segment. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Yeah, so this perception is out there sometimes that we’re almost, like, more focused on D.C. than on traders or something like that. I think in the wake of Sam Bankman-Fried blowing up and FTX, I remember there was this really kind of critical moment where I felt like I had to go represent the industry there because nobody else was doing it. And in many ways I feel like that helped the crypto industry, and people forget it could have gone really poorly under Gensler. The industry could have effectively been banned in the U.S., and we sued him and pushed back, and we won that case, and there’s another version of history that looks a lot. So in many ways I’m glad that we did that. Now, this doesn’t mean it’s a zero-sum game. Like, we’ve got to—we can go build products, we can go talk to our customers and help push the story ball forward. You know, I’ll still be in D.C. periodically, but more and more of my focus now is shifting to really just talking to our customers, improving our products. That’s going to be the focus much more in 2027. So, yeah, I think I’d leave it at that. Alicia Haas (Chief Financial Officer) Well, that’s a place to end. We’re going to focus on our customers. Thank you all for joining us for our Q&A for our Q3 2020 earnings. If you haven’t already, please go check out our presentation that Brian and I posted to our IR website where we discuss our quarterly results, and we will see you next quarter. Thank you all. Brian Armstrong (Chief Executive Officer) Thanks, y’all. Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice. © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:56
2d ago
|
Roblox Narrows Loss as User, Engagement Metrics Fall | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
The video-game company said average daily users were down 9% to 138 million, and engagement hours fell 15% to 34 billion. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:15
2d ago
|
Roblox Stock Sells Off Despite Q3 Earnings Beat: Details | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Roblox Inc. (NYSE:RBLX) posted its third-quarter fiscal 2026 results after Thursday’s closing bell. The stock sold off despite a double-beat in the print.RBLX stock is moving. Watch the price action here. Roblox reported quarterly losses of 32 cents per share, which beat the Street estimate for losses of 40 cents, per Benzinga Pro data. Quarterly revenue came in at $1.7 billion, which beat the analyst estimate of $1.62 billion. “Our Q3 financial results came in ahead of our guidance for revenue, bookings, and cash flow. Al is fundamentally reshaping the gaming industry, driving a step function change in the pace at which content can be created,” said CEO David Baszucki. “When anyone can create a game, what matters most is scaled distribution, effective discovery, a robust economy, industry-leading safety, and infrastructure to support it all. Roblox is built on an architecture that combines all of these elements, and Al has accelerated our ambitions. We’re building Roblox into the platform for all gaming, where any game can be created once, run anywhere, on any device at massive scale,” Baszucki added. Read Next Looking Ahead: Roblox expects fourth-quarter revenue of $1.47 billion to $1.58 billion. RBLX Stock Price: According to data from Benzinga Pro, Roblox stock was down 15.12% to $44.53 in Thursday’s extended trading. Photo: Shutterstock Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs © 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:19
2d ago
|
Roblox Q3 2026 Earnings Call Transcript | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Roblox (NYSE:RBLX) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company's third-quarter earnings call has been provided below. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:38
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:30
2d ago
|
FIS Announces Quarterly Dividend | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
JACKSONVILLE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--FIS® (NYSE: FIS), a global leader in financial services technology, announced a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per common share. The dividend is payable December 28, 2026, to FIS shareholders of record as of close of business on December 14, 2026. About FIS FIS is a financial technology company providing solutions to financial institutions and businesses globally. We unlock financial technology to the world across the money lifecycle underpinning the world's fi. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:37
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:45
2d ago
|
Strategy's Bitcoin Per Share Falls 3.7%: Rapid Earnings Reaction | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Strategy (MSTR -2.44%) earned $19.5 billion in the third quarter, or $44.75 per diluted share, and almost all of it came from the rising price of the bitcoin (BTC -2.53%) it holds. Shares were flat in early after-hours trading. The profit tells you bitcoin rebounded, not that the business improved. The measure that matters went the wrong way, because each share now holds less bitcoin than it did in January.Key NumbersNet income: $19.53 billion, up from $2.79 billion a year ago.Gain on digital assets: $20.91 billion, up from $3.89 billion a year ago.BTC Yield, the change in bitcoin per share: negative 3.7% year to date.Total revenue: $125.4 million, down 3% from a year ago.What It MeansStrategy marks its bitcoin to the market price every quarter, and the change runs straight through earnings. That means a record profit mostly tracks the price of the coin, while the small software business barely moves the result. Bitcoin per share is the real scorecard for this company, and it is shrinking. Strategy grew its pile of coins 26% this year, but its share count grew even faster, so each owner's slice got smaller. MSTR Strategy$141.62-$3.54 (-2.44%) NASDAQ · As of 4:00 PM ET 10/29/26 Cash is also flowing out to defend the company's preferred stock. Strategy spent about $2 billion this year buying back its STRC preferred shares while they traded below face value. It has also sold some bitcoin to help pay for those buybacks and for preferred dividends, so a company built to pile up bitcoin is now selling some to prop up its own credit. What to Watch NextWatch whether BTC Yield turns positive next quarter. Also track how much bitcoin Strategy sells to cover dividends and STRC buybacks. David Kretzmann has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:37
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:15
2d ago
|
Strategy Shares Slip After Q3 Earnings Print, CFO Transition | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
Strategy Inc. (NASDAQ:MSTR) posted its third-quarter fiscal 2026 results after Thursday's closing bell. Founder and Executive Chairman Michael Saylor said, “We're at the beginning of the next Bitcoin bull market. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:37
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 16:41
2d ago
|
JPMorgan, Citi and Barclays Are Now on DTCC’s Tokenization Rails. Why Is Canton (CC) Still Down 21% This Month? | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
JPMorgan, Citi, Barclays, and 17 other financial giants just signed onto DTCC's blockchain settlement platform, yet the coin powering that network keeps sliding deeper into the red. Something about how these banks actually use the network may surprise CC holders.The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) launched its Tokenization Service on October 28, 2026, a significant step for post-trade operations in the U.S. stock and bond markets. This service enables the creation of blockchain tokens that represent traditional securities, using the Canton Network, which relies on Canton Coin (CRYPTO: CC). To date, 20 participants have signed up to use this service from DTC, the depository arm of the DTCC, including major banks and brokerages that hold securities at DTC. DTC holds over $114 trillion in assets under custody, and the participants include Barclays (NYSE: BCS), Citigroup (NYSE: C | C Price Prediction), JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), Morgan Stanley, and State Street (NYSE: STT). The Tokenization Service operates on two networks: the Canton Network and DTCC’s private Besu network, with plans to add more networks in 2027. Despite these advancements, Canton Coin’s value has continued to decline. CC traded at $0.1005, up 1.1% over the past 24 hours but still down 20.4% for the month. This dip is significant, as CC is 48.2% below its all-time high of $0.1942, reached on February 3, 2026. Canton Strategic Holdings Is the Listed Company Closest to Canton Coin Canton Strategic Holdings (NASDAQ: CNTN) recently divested its legacy biotech division, Gravitas Life Sciences, to focus on Canton-related businesses. As a Super Validator on the Canton Network, the company earns CC rewards. It also offers a Locking-as-a-Service product that secures CC for participants who must maintain minimum balances according to governance rules. In the second quarter of 2026, these operations generated about $1.5 million in revenue, primarily from the new Locking-as-a-Service, which contributed $1.3 million. However, the company reported a net loss of $19 million due to the declining value of its 3.71 billion CC holdings, resulting in a $24 million unrealized loss, which reflects the depreciation of assets still on the books. Looking ahead, the company plans to list tokenized shares on TSV LLC, a blockchain trading platform, with trading expected to start as soon as November 2 under the SEC’s Innovation Exemption. Fairmint’s tokens are designed to carry the same rights as the company’s Nasdaq shares. However, the announcement does not clarify whether buyers will use CC for these transactions, suggesting trades may involve cash tokens or stablecoins, with CC serving only as a fee currency. Banks Have Yet to Commit to Buying Canton Coin While DTCC has welcomed 20 banks and brokers to its network, it has not guaranteed they will purchase, hold, or transact in Canton Coin. Institutions can avoid public-token systems entirely by using the Besu network. Their participation signals support for DTCC’s initiatives rather than a direct endorsement of Canton Coin. CC serves as the utility token for the Canton network, enabling applications to pay synchronizer fees—a system that organizes and confirms transactions. CC fees are burned, permanently removing those tokens from circulation. The network mints new tokens as rewards for app providers and validators based on their activity, so the overall CC supply grows as usage increases. However, under governance proposal CIP-0129, traffic on dedicated synchronizers will not contribute to burning CC. DTCC has not specified which type of synchronizer it will use for its Canton transactions, leaving CC holders uncertain. If transactions occur on a dedicated synchronizer, it may generate DTCC fees while saving banks time, but it could also burn less CC. The participating banks are also developing their own systems. Citi’s CEO, Jane Fraser, highlighted on the October 13 earnings call that Citi Token Services and tokenized deposits are key areas of focus, and the bank operates its own competing network connecting 300 banks. State Street CEO Ron O’Hanley said on October 14 that its tokenized fund platform will launch by year-end, with its cash fund operating on Stellar. Meanwhile, JPMorgan has its own tokenized fund offerings. Canton Coin Gains Only When Burning Outpaces Minting On October 23, Canton’s Super Validators approved CIP-0129, which introduces universal burning: every production synchronizer will burn CC at a specified list price, with volume discounts for high-frequency users. A subsequent proposal is needed to set prices, but for now, the network is minting more CC than it burns. The discounts could mean large users, likely banks, burn less CC per transaction. Additionally, the Canton Development Fund has allocated 15.8 million CC (valued at about $1.6 million) to RedStone to develop CAPS, a privacy-focused pricing standard still in development. If grant recipients sell their CC, it could further exert downward pressure on the token’s price. This ongoing situation is reflected in CC’s performance, which is trading below its 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages, indicating continued market struggles. Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:36
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:57
2d ago
|
Public Storage Prices Public Offering of $500 Million of Senior Notes at an Effective Interest Rate of 5.200% | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
FRISCO, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Public Storage (NYSE:PSA, the “Company”) announced today that it has priced a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of fixed rate senior notes due 2036 (the “Notes”). The Notes will be issued by Public Storage Operating Company (“PSOC”) and guaranteed by the Company.The Notes will bear interest at an annual rate of 5.600%, will be issued at 98.293% of par value and will mature on November 15, 2036. Including the impact of prior interest rate s. |
|||
|
Saved
2026-10-29 22:36
2d ago
Published
2026-10-29 17:05
2d ago
|
CN Announces Retirement of Chief Financial Officer Ghislain Houle and Appointment of Successor Jamie Lockwood | FMP Stock News | |
|
Original source text
| Source: Canadian National Railway CompanyMONTREAL, Oct. 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Canadian National Railway Company (TSX: CNR) (NYSE: CNI) today announced that Ghislain Houle, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, will retire from his role effective February 1, 2027. Jamie Lockwood, currently Vice-President, Investor Relations and Special Projects, has been selected to succeed Ghislain as Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, effective February 1, 2027. Ghislain will remain Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer through January 31, 2027, ensuring continuity through CN’s year-end reporting cycle. As of February 1, he will serve as Strategic Advisor to the President and Chief Executive Officer to support a smooth and orderly transition through his final day with the company on March 31, 2027, after which he will retire. Over three decades with CN, Ghislain has held progressively senior leadership roles and made significant contributions to the Company. Since becoming Chief Financial Officer in 2016, he has provided steady financial leadership through periods of significant economic and industry change, helped strengthen CN’s financial foundation and supported the advancement of the Company’s strategic priorities. Throughout his tenure, he has been a trusted member of CN’s executive leadership team and a strong steward of the Company’s financial discipline. Jamie joined CN in 2008 and has held leadership roles of increasing responsibility across Finance, Strategy, Investor Relations and Operations. This breadth of experience has given him a strong understanding of CN’s business, operations and financial strategy. His appointment follows a comprehensive succession planning process and reflects CN’s focus on developing strong internal talent and ensuring leadership continuity. “Ghislain has made an exceptional contribution to CN over three decades, and I am deeply grateful for his leadership, sound judgment and commitment to the Company. He leaves a strong foundation, and his continued support through the transition will be invaluable. Jamie is a highly respected leader with deep knowledge of CN and broad experience across our business. I am confident he is the right leader to build on that foundation and help advance our strategy while maintaining the disciplined financial stewardship our shareholders expect.” – Tracy Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer, CN “I am honored to take on the role of Chief Financial Officer and grateful for the opportunity to build on Ghislain’s contributions. I look forward to working with Tracy and the leadership team to continue advancing CN’s strategy, maintaining strong financial discipline and creating long-term value for our shareholders and customers.” – Jamie Lockwood, Vice-President, Investor Relations and special projects, CN About CN CN powers the economy by safely transporting more than 300 million tons of natural resources, manufactured products, and finished goods throughout North America every year for its customers. With its nearly 20,000-mile rail network and related transportation services, CN connects Canada’s Eastern and Western coasts with the U.S. Midwest and the U.S. Gulf Coast, contributing to sustainable trade and the prosperity of the communities in which it operates since 1919. Contacts: MediaInvestment CommunityAshley MichnowskiFrancois BelangerSenior ManagerSenior DirectorMedia RelationsInvestor Relations and Sustainability(438) 596-4329(514) 399-0052 [email protected]@cn.ca |
|||