NEW YORK and NEW ORLEANS, July 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., remind investors with substantial losses that they have until August 28, 2026 to file lead plaintiff applications in a securities class action lawsuit against Hub Group, Inc. ("Hub" or the "Company") (NasdaqGS: HUBG), if they purchased or otherwise acquired the Company’s securities between April 28, 2023, and May 11, 2026, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
What You May Do
If you purchased securities of Hub as above and would like to discuss your legal rights and how this case might affect you and your right to recover for your economic loss, you may, without obligation or cost to you, contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-833-538-3616 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-hubg/ to learn more. If you wish to serve as a lead plaintiff in this class action, you must petition the Court by August 28, 2026.
>>>CLICK HERE for more information
About the Lawsuit
Hub Group and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the Class Period, violating federal securities laws.
On February 5, 2026, the Company disclosed that its financial statements and reports for the first three quarters of 2025 should not be relied upon due to “an error that resulted in the understatement of purchased transportation costs and accounts payable in the first nine months of 2025” and that it planned to restate the statements. On this news, the price of Hub Group shares fell approximately 18%, from $51.33 per share on February 5, 2026 to $41.96 on February 6, 2026.
Then, on May 12, 2026, the Company disclosed that it had “identified certain transactions that were prematurely or incorrectly recognized or not adequately supported,” causing its 2023 and 2024 annual reports filed with the SEC to be “materially misstated,” such that they should no longer be relied upon, and “expect[ed] to conclude that it did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for each of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.” On this news, the price of Hub Group shares fell an additional 13%, from $41.86 per share at close on May 11, 2026 to $36.62 on May 12, 2026.
The case is Lawler v. Hub Group, Inc., et al, 26-cv-07596.
>>>To Learn More, Click HERE
About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.
TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services
To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.
>>>For More Information about the case, Click HERE
Contact:
Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
Lewis Kahn, Managing Partner [email protected]
1-833-538-3616
1100 Poydras St., Suite 960
New Orleans, LA 70163
On July 21, 2026, Archrock Inc (AROC) shares rose 3.4% today, bringing the current price to $38.29. Over the past 52 weeks, the stock has fluctuated between a l
News Corp's CEO Robert Thomson attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media and Technology Conference at the Sun Valley Resort in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., July 10, 2026. REUTERS/Brendan... Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab Read more
SummaryCompaniesNews Corp says Brave's "theft" hurts publishers, journalismBrave earlier sued News Corp, accusing it of threatening AI advancesPublishers, tech companies battle over use of copyrighted content for AIBrave not immediately available for commentJuly 21 (Reuters) - News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab, facing a lawsuit by search engine Brave Software, has filed a countersuit accusing it of "flagrant theft" in distributing and selling versions of articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Post to AI companies.
Brave had last year preemptively sued the media giant, seeking a court declaration that its practices were legal. It sued after receiving a cease-and-desist letter from News Corp, which is led by the family of Rupert Murdoch.
The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide during the World Cup. Sign up here.
In a Tuesday filing in the Oakland, California, federal court, News Corp said Brave's unauthorized "covert scraping" and resale of its copyrighted articles fall "nowhere near the bounds" of legally acceptable conduct known as fair use.
"The more content Brave copies and sells, the more revenue it generates, and the less incentive AI companies have to negotiate licenses with the publishers who produced the content," the lawsuit said. "Brave profits while publishers are cut out."
News Corp is seeking an injunction and unspecified monetary damages, plus damages of up to $150,000 per infringement.
Brave and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.
The competing lawsuits are part of a wave of litigation pitting publishers against technology companies that want to use copyrighted content to support AI.
BRAVE ACCUSED NEWS CORP OF DISRUPTING AIBrave sued News Corp in March 2025, seeking a court declaration that bundling copyrighted articles that can be licensed and sold is not copyright infringement.
It filed a revised complaint in May 2026, following what News Corp called failed negotiations for a "fair, market-based agreement."
Brave has argued that its indexing of News Corp content to make it searchable, and providing users with snippets and "high-level summaries" of that content, amounted to fair use.
The San Francisco-based company also accused News Corp of threatening to disrupt advances in generative AI, which it said many consider "the most important innovation so far this century."
BRAVE ACCUSED OF 'TACKY TECH TRAFFICKING'News Corp Chief Executive Robert Thomson said in a statement that Brave's looting of his company's content reflected "blatant disregard" for the damage to how information is disseminated.
"This era of tacky tech trafficking must come to an end if journalism is to have a sustainable future," Thomson said.
Brave has said it is the smallest of the three U.S.-based companies to operate independent search engines "at scale."
Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab dominates that market, followed by Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, which operates Bing.
The New York Post, Dow Jones and News Corp's British and Australian operations are also defendants in Brave's lawsuit.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Edwina Gibbs
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
On July 21, 2026, Paycom Software Inc (PAYC) shares fell 3.7% today, closing at $144.22. The stock has experienced a 52-week range between $104.90 and $248.95,
NEW YORK and NEW ORLEANS, July 21, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC (“KSF”) and KSF partner, former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., notifies investors in AeroVironment, Inc. (“AeroVironment” or the “Company”) (NasdaqGS: AVAV) of class action securities lawsuits.
CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuits seek to recover losses on behalf of investors of AeroVironment, Inc. who were adversely affected if they purchased the Company’s securities between 4:30 PM on June 24, 2025 and June 18, 2026, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). These actions are pending in the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Virginia and District of Delaware.
Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team:
https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-avav/
AeroVironment investors should contact KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn toll-free at 1-833-538-3616 or via email ([email protected]), or visit https://www.ksfcounsel.com/cases/nasdaqgs-avav/ to learn more.
CLICK HERE for more information
CASE DETAILS: According to the Complaints, AeroVironment and certain of its executives are charged with failing to disclose material information during the class period, violating federal securities laws.
The alleged false and misleading statements and omissions include, but are not limited to, that: (i) the Company understated the likelihood that it would imminently face competition from other vendors for the work it performed in connection with the U.S. Space Force's Satellite Communication Augmentation Resource program and the U.S. Space Force's ongoing efforts to modernize the Satellite Control Network; (ii) accordingly, defendants overstated AeroVironment's business and financial prospects; and (iii) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
The first-filed case is Norrell v. AeroVironment, Inc., et al, No. 26-cv-01429. A subsequent case, City Pension Fund for Firefighters and Police Officers in the City of Miami Beach v. AeroVironment, Inc. et al., No. 26-cv-00875, expanded the class period.
WHAT TO DO? If you invested in AeroVironment and suffered a loss during the relevant time frame, you have until July 27, 2026 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff; however, your ability to share in any recovery does not require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
To Learn More, Click HERE
About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, and a representative office in Luxembourg.
TOP 10 Plaintiff Law Firms - According to ISS Securities Class Action Services
To learn more about KSF, you may visit www.ksfcounsel.com.
Contact:
Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC
Lewis Kahn, Managing Partner [email protected]
1-833-538-3616
1100 Poydras St., Suite 960
New Orleans, LA 70163
On July 21, 2026, Morningstar Inc (MORN) shares fell 3.5% today, closing at $165.57. The stock has experienced a 52-week range between $141.49 and $289.63, high
On July 21, 2026, Vishay Intertechnology Inc (VSH) shares rose 6.5% to a current price of $39.78. This increase comes after a challenging month, where the stock
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 21, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Verra Mobility Corporation (NASDAQ: VRRM) between February 24, 2026 and May 26, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important August 4, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Verra common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Verra class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/verra-mobility-corporation-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 4, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Verra's relationship with Avis Budget Group ("Avis"), and in particular obtaining a contract extension with Avis. Further, Verra minimized concerns that major rent-a-cars could replace Verra with in-house solutions or outsourced alternatives. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Verra class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/verra-mobility-corporation-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306052
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
On June 30, 2026, Richard Pzena (Trades, Portfolio) executed a significant transaction involving Amdocs Ltd (DOX), a prominent player in the software and servic
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, but may initiate a beneficial Long position through a purchase of the stock, or the purchase of call options or similar derivatives in FORM over the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP (âLabatonâ) has filed a securities class action lawsuit (the âActionâ) on behalf of its clients Boston Retirement System (â
On July 21, 2026, Elastic NV ESTC shares fell 4.1% today, bringing the current price to $60.18. Over the last 52 weeks, the stock has traded between a high of $96.07 and a low of $42.05.
GF Value™ verdict: Current price of $60.18 is 42.2% below the GF Value™ of $104.13.GF Score™ of 74/100 indicates an above-average stock based on GuruFocus' historical data.Insider activity shows that insiders sold $6.7M in shares over the last 3 months, with no buying activity. Is ESTC Overvalued or Undervalued? The current price of Elastic NV ESTC at $60.18 represents a significant discount compared to the GF Value™ of $104.13, implying that the stock is undervalued by 42.2%. This margin of safety is appealing for those who adhere to value investing principles, suggesting a potential upside if the stock price aligns more closely with its intrinsic value. The GF Valuation label indicates that ESTC is significantly undervalued, reinforcing the notion that there could be a robust opportunity for long-term gains if the company can enhance its performance and investor sentiment improves.
However, potential investors should consider that the stock has been under pressure, with a year-to-date decline of 20.2% and a one-year drop of 30.7%. This downward momentum may stem from various factors, including overall market conditions and company-specific challenges. Therefore, while the undervaluation presents an opportunity, investors must remain cautious regarding the underlying risks that could hinder a rebound in share price.
GF Value™ is GuruFocus' proprietary measure of intrinsic value, calculated from historical trading multiples, past business growth, and future performance estimates.
How Does ESTC's Valuation Compare to Its History? Metric Current Historical P/E (TTM) 17.2x 189.8x Forward P/E 18.6x N/A The current P/E ratio of 17.2x is notably lower than its 5-year median P/E of 189.8x, indicating that the stock is trading well below its historical valuation. This P/E analysis aligns with the GF Value™ verdict, which suggests that ESTC is undervalued. The substantial difference between the current P/E and the historical median may reflect market skepticism regarding future growth or profitability, but it also emphasizes the potential for price correction if investor confidence returns.
What Does ESTC's GF Score™ Tell Us? Metric Rating GF Score™ 74 Financial Strength 6/10 Profitability 4/10 Growth 9/10 Valuation 4/10 Momentum 4/10 The GF Score™ of 74/100 indicates that Elastic NV is positioned above average compared to its peers. The strongest aspect of the score is its Growth rank of 9/10, suggesting a robust potential for future expansion and revenue growth. However, the weakest areas are Profitability and Valuation, both rated 4/10, which may indicate challenges in generating profits and achieving favorable valuation metrics in the current market environment. This mixed assessment highlights both the growth potential and the hurdles that could impact the company's financial health.
What Are Insiders Doing with ESTC Stock? Recent insider activity reveals that insiders have sold $6.7 million worth of shares in the last three months without any buying activity. This pattern of selling may raise concerns among potential investors, as it could signal a lack of confidence from those who are closely associated with the company. Insiders typically have better insights into the company's prospects, and such selling could indicate that they are not optimistic about short-term performance or future growth.
Without any buying activity from insiders, it could be interpreted as a cautious stance on the part of those within the company, further emphasizing the need for external investors to conduct thorough due diligence before making investment decisions.
What This Means for Investors Based on the GF Value™ assessment, Elastic NV ESTC appears to be undervalued at its current price of $60.18. The significant discount to the GF Value™ of $104.13 suggests a potential opportunity for investors. However, it is essential to consider the broader market trends, insider selling, and overall company performance before arriving at any investment conclusions.
For the complete analysis, visit the Elastic NV ESTC stock page. You can also explore the GF Value™ page for detailed valuation methodology, or use the GuruFocus Stock Screener to find similar opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions What is ESTC's GF Score™?
ESTC has a GF Score™ of 74/100, indicating it is above average compared to peers based on various financial metrics.
Is ESTC overvalued or undervalued?
According to the GF Value™ assessment, ESTC is undervalued, with a current price of $60.18 being 42.2% below its estimated fair value of $104.13.
What is ESTC's P/E ratio?
ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.2x, which is significantly below its 5-year median P/E of 189.8x, suggesting it is trading at a lower valuation compared to its historical averages.
This stock alert was generated using automated technology and GuruFocus financial data to provide readers with timely and accurate market reporting. This content was reviewed by GuruFocus editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
Satish Ganesan, who serves as a senior vice president and chief strategy officer at Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA +5.04%), disposed of 1,465 shares of common stock on July 17, 2026, according to a recent SEC Form 4 filing.
Transaction summaryMetricValueTransaction value$167,083Shares disposed1,465Post-transaction shares (directly held)61,834Post-transaction value$7.1 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average sale price ($114.05); post-transaction value based on July 17, 2026 market close ($114.05).
Key questionsWhat was the motivation behind this transaction?
The sale was non-discretionary and was performed solely to satisfy tax withholding requirements associated with the vesting and settlement of equity awards. As this was an automated tax event rather than an open-market trade, it does not represent a change in the insider's discretionary investment stance.What is the scale of the insider's remaining equity position?
Ganesan continues to hold 61,834 shares directly. This remaining position is valued at $7.05 million as of the July 17, 2026 market close.How does the company's valuation compare to its fundamental performance?
Synaptics maintains a market capitalization of $4.5 billion as of July 17, 2026. This valuation is supported by trailing twelve-month revenue of $1.2 billion, although the company reported a net loss of $48.1 million over the same period.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-07-17)$114.05Market Capitalization$4.5 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.2 billionNet Income (TTM)-$48.1 millionCompany SnapshotSynaptics develops and markets semiconductor product solutions across audio and video processing, high-speed multimedia connectivity, and display interface technologies, with AudioSmart, ConnectSmart, and DisplayLink representing core revenue-generating product lines.The company operates on a fabless semiconductor business model, designing specialized integrated circuits for consumer electronics and computing devices while outsourcing manufacturing to third-party foundries.Synaptics serves original equipment manufacturers and system integrators in the smartphone, tablet, laptop, and consumer electronics markets, with major global technology companies as its primary customers.Synaptics Incorporated is a global semiconductor solutions provider with $1.2 billion in TTM revenue, specializing in human-machine interface and connectivity technologies that enhance user experience across mobile and computing platforms. The company leverages its expertise in audio processing, video transmission, and display connectivity to address evolving demands in consumer electronics. With a market capitalization of $4.5 billion and a one-year stock price appreciation of about 70%, Synaptics demonstrates strong market recognition, though recent profitability pressures warrant monitoring of operational efficiency and margin recovery initiatives.
What this transaction means for investorsThe whole of this transaction went to taxes, and not a single share to the open market, so that’s clearly important to note. Plus, Ganesan runs strategy, and that’s what can shift the dynamics at Synaptics. Overall, he held onto 61,834 shares worth about $7 million, so his own stake rides on the direction he helps set, which is important for executives.
That direction is a deliberate tilt toward the internet of things and edge computing. In its latest earnings release, the firm reported that Core IoT sales jumped 31% last quarter within total revenue of $294.2 million, and management now expects full-year IoT revenue above $385 million, a more than 40% jump. CEO Rahul Patel said the company is "aligning our portfolio to capitalize on these emerging opportunities,” which is key given that the older mobile touch business, by contrast, is shrinking. For long-term investors, that reshaping is the bet worth watching. Synaptics is steering toward its fastest-growing market while a legacy segment fades, and a strategy officer holding his shares through the transition is at least a small vote that the pivot will work.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Synaptics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Vikram Gupta, the chief product officer at Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA +5.04%), disposed of 1,848 shares of common stock in transactions completed on July 17, 2026, and July 20, 2026, as disclosed in a recent SEC Form 4 filing.
Transaction summaryMetricValueTransaction value$211,023Shares sold1,848Post-transaction shares (directly held)81,586Post-transaction value$9.27 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average sale price ($114.19); post-transaction value based on July 20, 2026 market close ($113.60).
Key questionsWhat was the primary driver for this disposition of equity?
Approximately 80% of the total volume—1,488 shares—was non-discretionary, as these shares were withheld by the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations triggered by the settlement of restricted stock units.How does the discretionary sale align with the insider’s trading strategy?
The sale of 360 shares was executed pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan established on September 12, 2025, which provides a structured framework for liquidity that is not contingent on current market conditions.What is the recent financial and market context for the company?
Synaptics stock achieved a one-year gain of 72% as of the July 20, 2026, transaction date, while reporting trailing-twelve-month revenue of $1.2 billion and a net loss of $48.1 million.Does the insider retain a meaningful stake in the company?
Yes, Vikram Gupta remains a direct shareholder with 81,586 shares, representing approximately 0.2% of the firm, which had a market capitalization of $4.5 billion as of the July 17, 2026, market close.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-07-17)$114.05Market Capitalization$4.5 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.2 billionNet Income (TTM)-$48.1 millionCompany SnapshotSynaptics develops and markets semiconductor product solutions, including AudioSmart for advanced sound and voice processing, ConnectSmart for high-speed multimedia connectivity, and DisplayLink for compressed video transmission, generating revenue across audio, video, and connectivity solutions.The company operates a fabless semiconductor business model, designing specialized chips for consumer electronics and computing devices while leveraging third-party manufacturing partners to optimize capital efficiency and scalability.Synaptics serves original equipment manufacturers and system integrators in the personal computing, mobile, and consumer electronics markets, with primary customers including major laptop, smartphone, and peripheral device manufacturers.Synaptics Incorporated is a global semiconductor solutions provider with $1.2 billion in TTM revenue, specializing in human-machine interface and connectivity technologies. The company has demonstrated significant market momentum, with its stock appreciating 72% over the past year, reflecting investor confidence in its product portfolio and market positioning. Synaptics maintains competitive advantages through its specialized expertise in audio processing, video transmission, and connectivity solutions that enhance user experience across diverse consumer and computing platforms.
What this transaction means for investorsThe discretionary piece of this filing is just 360 shares, worth about $41,000. Everything else, roughly 80%, was scooped up for taxes when Gupta's restricted stock settled. For the executive who owns Synaptics' product roadmap, keeping 81,586 shares while a sliver goes to the IRS doesn’t raise any red flags for investors at all.
More interestingly, however, those products are increasingly aimed at edge AI. Synaptics grew fiscal third-quarter revenue 10% to $294.2 million, led by a 31% jump in core internet-of-things chips, and rolled out an FDA-cleared and design-win pipeline in what management calls physical AI and robotics, with more than 35 customers now engaged there, “including a leading generative AI OEM,” according to the latest earnings call. CEO Rahul Patel also said the company is "delivering highly differentiated products and solutions.” Ultimately, this robotics engagement is worth keeping an eye on, especially since a product chief holding his shares while wins accumulate is a modest signal that the roadmap has runway.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Synaptics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Ken Rizvi, an executive at Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA +5.04%), reported a non-discretionary disposition of 1,473 shares on July 17, 2026, according to an SEC Form 4 filing.
Transaction summaryMetricValueTransaction value~$168,000Shares sold1,473Post-transaction shares (directly held)104,417Post-transaction value$11.9 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average sale price ($114.05); post-transaction value based on July 17, 2026 market close ($114.05).
Key questionsWhat was the primary driver of this transaction?
The disposition was non-discretionary and initiated to cover tax liabilities following the vesting of equity awards, rather than representing an open-market sale based on a directional view of the company.How does this affect the insider's long-term equity exposure?
The executive's direct stake decreased by 1% in this transaction.What is the scale of the executive's remaining financial interest?
Rizvi continues to hold 104,417 shares directly, maintaining a total beneficial position valued at $11.9 million based on the market close on the transaction date.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-07-17)$114.05Market Capitalization$4.5 billionRevenue (TTM)$1.2 billionNet Income (TTM)-$48.1 millionCompany SnapshotSynaptics develops and markets semiconductor product solutions across audio and video processing, high-speed multimedia connectivity, and display interface technologies, with AudioSmart, ConnectSmart, and DisplayLink representing core revenue-generating product lines.The company operates on a fabless semiconductor business model, designing specialized integrated circuits for consumer electronics and computing devices while outsourcing manufacturing to third-party foundries.Synaptics serves original equipment manufacturers and system integrators in the smartphone, tablet, laptop, and consumer electronics markets, with major global technology companies as its primary customers.Synaptics Incorporated is a global semiconductor solutions provider with $1.2 billion in TTM revenue, specializing in human-machine interface and connectivity technologies that enhance user experience across mobile and computing platforms. The company leverages its expertise in audio processing, video transmission, and display connectivity to address evolving demands in consumer electronics. With a market capitalization of $4.5 billion and a one-year stock price appreciation of 70%, Synaptics demonstrates strong market recognition, though recent profitability pressures warrant monitoring of operational efficiency and margin recovery initiatives.
What this transaction means for investorsRizvi is Synaptics' finance chief, and his 104,417-share stake is large relative to the executives whose equity vested this week, worth about $11.9 million. The 1,473 shares disposed of to cover taxes barely register against that. For the person who signs off on the numbers, holding a position that size is the clearest alignment a balance sheet can show.
Meanwhile, Synaptics grew fiscal third-quarter revenue 10% to $294.2 million with core internet-of-things chips up 31%, and returned cash through $39 million of buybacks in the quarter. But it carries $836.7 million in long-term debt against $404 million in cash. Still, Rizvi said the company's margins remain “very healthy” into the June quarter, which guides to about $305 million in revenue, and he laid out a strategic vision as well, saying: “On a longer-term basis, as we think about the core IoT business and specifically, as we think about the processing and processor capabilities, those should have a margin profile greater than the corporate average.” How that vision pans out will certainly be more important for long-term investors than a sale like this one.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Synaptics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
On July 21, 2026, Sensata Technologies Holding PLC (ST) shares rose 4.3% to a current price of $46.51. The stock has experienced significant volatility over the
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 21, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Planet Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: PLNT) between November 6, 2025 and May 6, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 14, 2026.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Planet Fitness common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Planet Fitness class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/planet-fitness-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than September 14, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or concealed material adverse facts concerning the true state of Planet Fitness' customer acquisition and marketing metrics. Notably, Planet Fitness' updated marketing messaging was failing to resonate with, and was actively intimidating, its core target demographic of fitness beginners and casual gym-goers. As a result, Planet Fitness was experiencing a significant headwind in net member joins during its peak first-quarter sign-up period that rendered its previously issued fiscal 2026 guidance and long term financial targets unachievable. Instead, Planet Fitness would be required to restructure its marketing strategy, losing the gains they praised from continuing the same marketing campaign, and entirely halt the planned Black Card price increase which sale projections were premised upon. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Planet Fitness class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/planet-fitness-inc/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306054
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) Q2 2026 Earnings Call July 21, 2026 5:00 PM EDT
Company Participants
Adrienne Atkinson - Director of Investor Relations
Dominic Ng - Chairman, President & CEO
Christopher Del Moral-Niles - Executive VP & CFO
Irene Oh - Executive VP & Chief Risk Officer
Conference Call Participants
Jared David Shaw - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division
David Rochester - Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division
David Smith - Truist Securities, Inc., Research Division
Manan Gosalia - Morgan Stanley, Research Division
David Chiaverini - Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Timur Braziler - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division
Ebrahim Poonawala - BofA Securities, Research Division
Christopher McGratty - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Matthew Clark - Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division
Sun Young Lee - TD Cowen, Research Division
Bernard Von Gizycki - Deutsche Bank AG, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Good day, and welcome to East West Bancorp's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Adrienne Atkinson, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Adrienne Atkinson
Director of Investor Relations
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and thank you, everyone, for joining us to review East West Bancorp's Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results. With me are Dominic Ng, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Chris Del Moral-Niles, Chief Financial Officer; and Irene Oh, Chief Risk Officer. This call is being recorded and will be available for replay on our Investor Relations website. The slide deck referenced during this call is available on our Investor Relations site.
Management may make projections or other forward-looking statements, which may differ materially from the actual results due to a number of risks and uncertainties. Management may discuss non-GAAP financial measures. For a more detailed description of the risk factors and a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures, please refer
The Procure Space ETF is rated Sell due to high risk and insufficient return potential at current levels. UFO has fallen over 30% from its 52-week high, with technicals indicating further downside unless a strong bounce materializes soon. The ETF's portfolio combines unprofitable, cash-burning growth stocks and legacy defense names, neither offering clear value or safety.
Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX +3.19%) has drawn a great amount of excitement in recent times. The company, better known as SpaceX, completed the world's biggest initial public offering last month -- and saw its stock soar 27% in the first days of trading.
In recent times, SpaceX stock has pulled back, even falling below its IPO price of $135. But even at this level, I think the stock is too expensive considering the risk involved -- that's why I'm still not buying. Let's check out the details.
Image source: Getty Images.
A smart mix of businesses It's true that SpaceX offers a smart mix of growth businesses -- rocket launches, connectivity, and artificial intelligence (AI) -- and these businesses can work together to deliver efficiency. For example, SpaceX can use its rockets to deliver materials to space for the satellite-based internet service and the AI business. This offers SpaceX great autonomy and keeps costs down.
The company has also made progress on goals such as bringing down the costs of rocket launches, and last year it completed more orbital launches than any other player. The connectivity business has seen its subscribers quadruple over three years, and this growth is key since this unit drives revenue growth.
All of that is positive, and SpaceX, at $119 at the July 20 market close, is considerably lower than it was a few weeks ago. But I'm still not buying because the stock is expensive given the amount of risk involved. Prior to the IPO, Morningstar said its fair value for SpaceX was $63, which seems reasonable; today, the SpaceX price remains far from that level.
Today's Change
(
3.19
%) $
3.82
Current Price
$
123.67
Upcoming earnings reports I also think that before diving in, it's important to take a look at an earnings report or two to monitor the company's spending trends and the level of revenue that's being generated. So far, we may look at the financial picture over the past three years, as provided in the prospectus. But since SpaceX's capital expenditures are increasing, I'd like to see fresh earnings data.
This is particularly key for a company like SpaceX, which has many goals linked to technologies that are still in development. For example, as SpaceX increases capital spending, is its revenue climbing at a fast pace? Last year, capex of $20 billion exceeded revenue, which was $18 billion. I'd like to see revenue step ahead in the coming quarters.
At this point, SpaceX remains an interesting business that's made progress in key areas. The company could have a very bright future several years down the road, so I understand that some investors aim to get in early. But in my opinion, risk remains high, and visibility remains limited -- so even though SpaceX stock has declined, I'm still not buying.
Meta is working on an AI storytelling app called StoryKit, which creates AI-generated children’s stories with custom characters, settings, lessons, and music. As the App Store listing assures parents, “You don’t need to write a single word.”
At last, a tech company has found a way to outsource humanity’s oldest pastime: using our imaginations.
StoryKit was first spotted in the App Store by 9to5Mac. Meta confirmed to TechCrunch that the company is piloting StoryKit in select countries to see how parents like it. A Meta spokesperson described StoryKit as a creative storytelling app used to craft personalized, imaginative storybooks for children and noted that it uses AI safety filters with no social features and is only available to users over the age of 18.
To generate a story in the app, you first select a character, which you can create by “[snapping] a photo of their favorite toy or person to bring them to life,” according to the description in the App Store. Then you describe the world of your story and choose a lesson, so that you can “weave in values like kindness, courage, or empathy without it feeling like a lecture.”
Image Credits:StoryKit (opens in a new window) The good news about StoryKit is that it could be a lot worse. Meta regularly ships boneheaded ideas like Instagram deepfake generators and “pervert glasses.” Comparatively, is it so bad to doom children to soulless bedtime stories? Should we have expected anything better from the company that promised us a utopian world of virtual reality work meetings?
Humans have their faults, but if we’re good at anything, it’s making stuff up. We’ve been telling stories for as long as we’ve existed. We don’t even have to spin up original tales of fairy princesses and dragon slayers. We have always drawn from mythology, fables, and other stories — the blockbuster movie of the summer is literally an ancient myth that originated from this same tradition of oral storytelling.
Parents lead exhausting, busy lives, but it has always been possible to survive bedtime without using an inherently uncreative technology that calculates the most predictable response to a prompt.
You could see how it might be tempting to pull up StoryKit when your kid rejects your bookcase full of children’s books and demands that you improvise an intergalactic tale about a turtle and a hedgehog who are best friends and solve space mysteries. But do we really want to reject a chance at whimsy and silliness and instead outsource these moments of connection to reading AI-generated scripts from our smartphones?
Perhaps the moral of the story here is that we can choose not to live in a world where children are raised on bedtime stories written by large language models. Meta’s vision of the future may be antisocial and bleak, but we have the power to reject that reality.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Amanda Silberling is a senior writer at TechCrunch covering the intersection of technology and culture. She has also written for publications like Polygon, MTV, the Kenyon Review, NPR, and Business Insider. She is the co-host of Wow If True, a podcast about internet culture, with science fiction author Isabel J. Kim. Prior to joining TechCrunch, she worked as a grassroots organizer, museum educator, and film festival coordinator. She holds a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania and served as a Princeton in Asia Fellow in Laos.
You can contact or verify outreach from Amanda by emailing [email protected] or via encrypted message at @amanda.100 on Signal.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 21, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) between May 1, 2025 and January 28, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important August 11, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Microsoft common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Microsoft class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/microsoft-corporation/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 11, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Microsoft's Copilot family of products had experienced significant brand positioning, user experience, usage, data siloing, computational capacity, organizational, and interoperability problems; (2) Microsoft's flagship proprietary AI model ranked well below competitors on a number of benchmark tests; (3) Microsoft needed to increase by billions of dollars its capital expenditures and divert graphics processing unit ("GPU") and central processing unit ("CPU") capacity away from fulfilling demand for its profitable Azure services in order to improve the competitive positioning of its critical Copilot family of products and increase its AI-related research and development ("R&D"); and (4) as a result, Microsoft had failed to convert a significant percentage of its commercial Microsoft 365 users to paid Copilot subscriptions and Microsoft's Copilot offerings had lost market share to rival products, a trend that was increasing. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Microsoft class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/microsoft-corporation/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306038
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is poised for a major AI event, with potential for another significant AI customer announcement following Microsoft and existing OpenAI and Meta deals. AMD's recent Helios rack launch and Microsoft partnership reinforce its position, with speculation of an Anthropic deal that could further boost AI chip revenues. Consensus estimates project a $19 EPS in 2028, but internal targets and potential new deals suggest $20–30 EPS is achievable, making AMD's current valuation at ~$500 not overly expensive.
Someone has a single pension, a soft spot for the islands, and hopes to finish their story in Hawaii on that one check. No Social Security, no side portfolio, no rental income. Just the pension. This piece examines whether the math clears and what the pension must deliver to hold up for thirty years in the most expensive state most Americans seriously consider.
The Ground Truth on Cost in Hawaii Hawaii’s cost-of-living index sits at 109.951, which understates the reality for anyone buying groceries on Oahu. Per capita income of $71,573 translates to a real, purchasing-power-adjusted $65,095, which matters when a pension is fixed and the shelves are not.
Assume a retiree who owns a modest condo outright on Oahu. Renting a one-bedroom in Honolulu near $2,400 a month makes this plan impossible on a single pension. With the home paid off, the annual working budget breaks down as:
Housing: HOA at about $600 a month, property tax on an owner-occupied unit with senior exemption near $1,800 a year, and hurricane/hazard insurance around $1,800. Total: $11,000. Healthcare at 65-plus: Medicare Part B at the $202.90 standard premium, a Medigap plan, and Part D. Budget $5,500 a year per person. If the pension arrives before 65, add an ACA bridge of roughly $8,000 to $12,000 depending on income. Food: Hawaii runs meaningfully above mainland grocery pricing. A USDA moderate plan translates to roughly $8,000 a year for one, $14,000 for two. Electricity and utilities: HECO rates are the highest in the country. Plan on $3,600 a year for a small condo. Transportation: One older car, insurance, registration, and gas well above the $3.85 national average. Around $4,500. Miscellaneous and reserves: Home maintenance, one flight to the mainland a year, gifts, replacement appliances, personal spending. $8,000 is the realistic floor. A single retiree on Oahu with the mortgage gone needs roughly $40,000 to $45,000 a year. A couple runs closer to $58,000. The BLS average U.S. household spends $78,535 a year, so this is a disciplined budget recalibrated for island pricing.
Turning That Budget Into a Pension Number With a single pension as the only income source, there is no withdrawal-rate math. The pension either covers the budget or it does not. For a single retiree with a paid-off condo, the pension must deliver about $42,000 net of federal tax. For a couple, roughly $58,000 net.
The 2026 Social Security COLA of 2.8% is a useful reference for what a well-indexed benefit looks like. Most private pensions have no COLA at all. With CPI at 332.6 and running 10.399 points higher over the last twelve months, a flat pension loses real ground fast. A $45,000 unindexed pension today is roughly $30,000 in purchasing power twenty years in. That is the risk that quietly ends this plan for people who assumed the check would keep up.
The Hawaii Pension Exemption That Changes the Answer Hawaii does not tax the employer-funded portion of a qualified pension. A teacher’s pension from CalPERS, a firefighter’s pension from a mainland municipality, a Boeing (NYSE:BA | BA Price Prediction) or utility pension, a federal CSRS or FERS annuity: the employer-contributed portion is exempt from Hawaii income tax. Only the piece attributable to personal contributions is taxable at the state level. For a retiree whose entire income is a defined-benefit pension, the effective Hawaii income tax bill is often close to zero, even though Hawaii ranks 46th on the individual income tax component of the State Tax Competitiveness Index and carries the second-highest adjusted state-and-local burden in the country at $10,006 per capita.
The General Excise Tax runs 4% statewide and 4.5% on Oahu, hitting services, rent, medical, and groceries. Hawaii collects on the spending side of a pensioner’s life rather than the income side. A retiree pulling from a 401(k) in Hawaii pays ordinary state income tax on those withdrawals. A retiree living on the same dollar amount from a pension pays almost nothing on the income and then pays GET on the outflow. For anyone weighing whether to roll a pension into a lump sum, the exemption is a real reason to keep the annuity form.
Property tax reinforces this. Honolulu’s owner-occupant rate is among the lowest in the country, and the senior homeowner exemption knocks assessed value down further. The state punishes consumption and rewards ownership, which fits a paid-off retiree living quietly on a fixed check.
What It Actually Takes Hawaii on nothing but a single pension works inside a narrow window. The pension must be at least $45,000 a year gross for a single retiree, or closer to $65,000 for a couple, and the home must be owned outright before the first check clears. The pension needs a COLA, or the plan fails around year fifteen. And the retiree must be the kind of pensioner Hawaii’s tax code was written for: an employer-funded defined benefit, taken as an annuity, claimed as exempt on the state return every year. Miss any of those pieces and the answer changes. Hit all of them, and the single pension is genuinely enough.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Nike is planning to cut off thousands of online distributors in China beginning in January as the sneaker giant looks to clean up what's become a messy digital marketplace and get the region back to growth, the company said Tuesday.
Starting next year, Nike's online footprint will shift primarily to the retailer's official website and app, and the storefronts it operates on Tmall, JD.com and Douyin, some of China's largest online marketplaces and social platforms.
Currently, consumers can shop Nike through all of those channels as well as thousands of other online storefronts powered by Nike's brick-and-mortar partners in the region and a network of secondary distributors. While the vast digital network has led to widespread consumer access to Nike's products, it's also created an inconsistent branding and pricing experience and hampered the company's efforts to reverse a sales decline in the region.
"These new flagships will serve as the single, elevated destination for Nike within these ecosystems, with clearer product presentation, stronger storytelling and more connected consumer journeys," Cathy Sparks, Nike's new vice president and general manager of Greater China, wrote in a letter. "This is about strengthening the platforms where consumers already begin and end their shopping journey, making sure those experiences are direct, consistent and unmistakably Nike."
"This is not about reducing access. It is about reducing fragmentation and strengthening the consumer journey," she said. "When the experience is consistent, the brand becomes stronger."
Nike's plans to pare back its online footprint are designed to create a better, more consistent experience for the consumer and allow it to take back pricing control online. However, there are also concerns it could lead to a material drop in revenue in a region that's already shrunk about 30% in the last five years.
News about Nike's plans to cut off online distributors first came to light late last month in a local Chinese media report. It prompted a note from BNP Paribas equity analyst Laurent Vasilescu, who wrote the move is reminiscent of Nike's ill-fated decision to cut off wholesalers in North America, which contributed to its collapse of market dominance in the region, as well as steep declines in sales and margins.
"This strategy opened up shelf space for competitors and the strategy ended poorly for Nike. We believe the same could happen if it takes the same approach in China," Vasilescu wrote last month, adding that BNP was sticking with its underperform rating for the company. "We don't think Nike has a distributor problem but rather a product problem which also applies in other markets."
The change is also expected to hurt Nike's brick-and-mortar partners in the region, which have expanded their online presence in recent years to grow their own businesses.
Still, Topsports, Nike's largest distributor in mainland China, said it supports the company's decision.
"Topsports has worked with Nike for 27 years based on the principle of mutual benefit and shared growth," Topsports CEO Yu Wu said in a statement. "This adjustment will bring some short-term pressure to our business. But we firmly believe that, over the medium- to long-term, this direction will help promote a healthier, more orderly, and more sustainable retail ecosystem in China, while further improving consumer experience and product appeal."
"Looking ahead, we will continue to work closely with Nike, leveraging our strengths in offline retail operations, local consumer service, and deep market development across city tiers," Wu said. "Through new concept sport stores and high-quality physical retail experiences, we will bring Chinese consumers richer and more meaningful sport experiences."
Nike is trying to lure back shoppers in China by controlling how its products are sold online, directing consumers to official Nike channels as the American sportswear giant continues to lose ground to domestic rivals.
Nike (NKE 1.17%) has been struggling for years, and those challenges continued in the first half of the year, pushing the stock lower.
Nike told investors that its hoped-for turnaround would take longer than expected; revenue continued to be flat; its CFO said it was stepping down, and tariff-related expenses torched its profits.
As a result, the stock lost 36% over the first half of the year, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.
As you can see from the chart below, the stock's declines came primarily in March and April, and it fell sharply following its third-quarter earnings report at the end of March.
NKE data by YCharts
Nike's slide continues Nike's issues in the first half of the year will be familiar to anyone who has followed the stock in recent years.
Investors have been hopeful that Elliott Hill, who took over as CEO nearly two years ago, could turn the business around, but that has yet to materialize.
In the first half of the calendar year, tariffs hit the company's profits sharply. In its third-quarter earnings report, revenue was flat at $11.3 billion, and gross margin fell 130 basis points to 40.2%.
The stock fell 15.5% on April 1 after the report came out, its worst day of the year. However, investors seemed to be more concerned about its forecast of declining revenue in the fourth quarter and comments on the earnings call that it didn't expect gross margin to return to growth until the second quarter of fiscal 2027, which ends this November. Investors were hopeful that it would get back to margin expansion sooner than that.
Additionally, the stock sank in March as the war in Iran weighed on stocks broadly, especially consumer discretionary names like Nike. Nike is sensitive to inflation, which can impact consumer spending, and the war also has the potential to disrupt supply chains.
Image source: Getty Images.
What's next for Nike Nike stock initially plunged on its fourth-quarter earnings report, released on June 30, falling double-digits in the after-hours session. However, the stock finished up 5% the following day, a sign that investors may believe that Nike is bottoming out.
The results were again mostly underwhelming, with revenue down 1%, but investors seem convinced that the new fiscal year would bring a return to margin expansion, which it continues to expect in the second quarter.
Nike's turnaround is showing results in some categories as it's now growing and gaining market share in running, but there's still a lot of work to be done. At this point, it's hard to call the stock cheap even as it's fallen more than 75% from its peak, but there's certainly upside potential if it can return to growth on the top and bottom lines.
Warren Buffett has never believed in owning a little bit of everything. Berkshire Hathaway's (BRKA 0.15%)(BRKB 0.40%) latest 13F filing shows just how far the famed investor leans the other way. Of a $263 billion U.S. stock portfolio, about 67% (more than two-thirds) sits in just five companies.
And that concentration isn't a quirk of one quarter. It's how the Oracle of Omaha has run Berkshire's money for decades, and he has been unusually direct about why. Here's a closer look at where the money sits, why Buffett runs the portfolio this way, and what everyday investors should (and shouldn't) take from it.
Image source: The Motley Fool
Five stocks, two-thirds of the portfolio Berkshire's 13F, which covers its U.S.-listed stock holdings as of the end of March, lists a portfolio of only about two dozen companies.
At the top is iPhone maker Apple, a position worth about $58 billion, or about 22% of the portfolio. Integrated payments company American Express is second at about $46 billion, or about 17%. Those two names alone account for nearly 40% of the entire book.
Rounding out the top five are Coca-Cola at about $30 billion (about 12% of the portfolio), Bank of America at about $25 billion (about 10%), and Chevron at about $17.5 billion (about 7%). Add it all up, and five companies carry about 67% of a $263 billion portfolio.
The next tier includes Occidental Petroleum and a newer position in Alphabet -- a stake first disclosed in the third quarter of 2025 that Berkshire has kept building since. But the filing doesn't capture everything Berkshire owns. The conglomerate's Japanese trading house stakes trade overseas, and its dozens of wholly owned businesses never show up in a 13F at all.
Worth noting, too: Berkshire was sitting on about $397 billion in cash and Treasury bills at the end of March. The cash pile is now bigger than the entire stock portfolio.
Why Buffett concentrates The concentration is deliberate, and Buffett spelled out his reasoning decades ago.
"We believe that a policy of portfolio concentration may well decrease risk if it raises, as it should, both the intensity with which an investor thinks about a business and the comfort-level he must feel with its economic characteristics before buying into it," he wrote in his 1993 letter to shareholders.
"Too much of a good thing can be wonderful," he added in the same letter, borrowing a line from Mae West.
In other words, Buffett would rather own a handful of businesses he understands deeply than a hundred he knows casually.
The top five fit that mold. These are companies he has owned and studied for years, in some cases decades, with durable brands and long records of paying dividends.
And the portfolio is still very much his. Buffett gave up the CEO title at the end of last year, but as Berkshire's chairman he told CNBC last week that it was he, not new CEO Greg Abel, who initiated the company's multibillion-dollar bet on Alphabet.
Today's Change
(
-0.40
%) $
-1.98
Current Price
$
489.27
What everyday investors should take from it The obvious lesson is conviction. Buffett doesn't spread money across his 20th-best ideas. When he finds a business he believes in at a valuation he can accept, he sizes the position so that being right matters.
Of course, before anyone mirrors those weights, it's worth looking at what surrounds them. Berkshire's five-stock core sits on top of dozens of wholly owned operating businesses, a sprawling insurance operation, and that $397 billion pile of cash and Treasury bills. Berkshire could watch its biggest holding get cut in half and keep compounding. An individual investor with two-thirds of their savings in five stocks has no such cushion.
To me, the deeper lesson is the homework. Buffett's concentration is earned by decades of studying these specific businesses, and he can hold through downturns because he knows exactly what he owns. Copying the weights without that understanding replicates his risk, not his edge.
So, study the five names. They say a lot about what one of history's great investors considers durable, and a watchlist built from them is a fine place to hunt for stocks to buy and hold. The discipline behind the portfolio is worth copying, too. But buying five stocks at Berkshire's weights is a different decision entirely, and for most investors, it's probably the wrong one.
Netflix (NFLX +1.58%) is going through a rough patch. The company's shares are down 45% over the past 12 months, as investors increasingly worry about slowing revenue growth and stiff competition. Netflix's recent second-quarter update, released on July 16, seems to have confirmed these fears. Even though its revenue and earnings for the period met Wall Street's estimates, the company's third-quarter guidance didn't, leading to a sharp post-earnings drop.
However, there are still good reasons to be optimistic about Netflix's future. Let's consider one remark management made during the company's latest earnings call that should have investors excited.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
A large remaining opportunity Netflix set out to revolutionize entertainment, and it has succeeded. The company has pioneered the streaming category, which has gained significant traction over the past decade. However, there is still plenty of room for the company to grow, and management was quick to point that out. As the company's CFO, Spencer Adam Neumann, said:
We're under 45% penetrated into addressable households around the world. It's roughly 800 million addressable households. We're capturing, we think, just 7% of addressable revenue market.
This data suggests a massive opportunity ahead as streaming continues to displace traditional cable due to its much more convenient format, and that's excellent news for the company's future. But can Netflix overcome recent obstacles and beat the competition to be one of the biggest winners in this untapped market? My view is that the answer is a resounding "yes." Here's why.
Today's Change
(
1.58
%) $
1.07
Current Price
$
68.67
Netflix has a strategy in place to attract more viewers to the platform. The company noted that over the past five years, six of the top 10 days for new member sign-ups came from live events. In other words, by doubling down on live programming, Netflix could significantly boost its ecosystem of paid subscribers. The company is especially going after live sports and plans to bid on events that could have an even bigger impact than the ones it has already landed.
Netflix owns the rights to the 2027 FIFA Women's World Cup, for instance, and is now planning to bid for the Men's World Cup, which is more popular. But the sports niche is just part of the company's live programming strategy. It has launched successful live events and shows in other categories in recent years. Expect more in the future. Of course, live programming is just one of the many niches the company could tap into to boost engagement and subscriber count. The company has ramped up long-form video podcasts, gaming, and other initiatives.
And that's before we account for the company's wide moat from its brand name, which gives it a significant competitive advantage over most competitors in the streaming market and grants it some pricing power. All of that tells us that Netflix can recover and deliver strong returns to patient investors. The stock is still a buy, especially on the dip.
Moderna's (MRNA +0.29%) shares have already soared by 92% this year. Yet, the biotech is racing toward another catalyst. The company could receive an important regulatory approval on Aug. 5. Should investors purchase Moderna's shares before then?
Is there more upside ahead? Moderna developed mRNA-1010, an investigational flu vaccine. mRNA-1010 posted better efficacy numbers than some approved products in this category in phase 3 clinical trials. There is a large unmet need here, since the flu continues to cause thousands of hospitalizations every year, especially among older adults, the demographic Moderna is targeting with mRNA-1010.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set a PDUFA goal date -- or the target deadline by which it will either approve or reject Moderna's application for mRNA-1010 -- of Aug. 5.
Image source: Getty Images.
Could the biotech's shares soar if it receives regulatory approval for this candidate? That's unlikely to happen, as this success is almost certainly already baked into the company's share price. After all, a few weeks ago, an FDA advisory committee unanimously affirmed that mRNA-1010's benefits outweigh its risks, sending Moderna's shares sharply higher. And since then, the stock has moved mostly in the wrong direction, signaling that some investors may have used this opportunity to pocket some profits.
Today's Change
(
0.29
%) $
0.17
Current Price
$
59.66
So, it doesn't make much sense to invest in Moderna today expecting the stock to jump on Aug. 5. The good news is that there are other reasons to buy the company's shares. Moderna has a deep pipeline of mRNA-based vaccine candidates, at least some of which may become breakthroughs in their respective niches. Given the company's late-stage pipeline, it could have at least a couple more products approved within the next three years, helping it improve its financial results while reducing its exposure to its coronavirus business, which has not been performing well lately. The stock is a buy for those reasons.
Prosper Junior Bakiny has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Moderna. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
For years, Chinese companies such as Alibaba and Baidu headed to the U.S. to list their shares, citing its deeper capital markets and higher valuations. Now, one American biotech firm is betting on doing the opposite.
Axiom Biosciences, a San Diego-based developer of regenerative and genetic medicines, plans to go public in Hong Kong in 2027, followed by a secondary U.S. listing in 2029. The company says the "contrarian" move will open the door to sophisticated, biotech-focused investors while bringing it closer to clinical and commercial partners across Asia.
"Some of the most important science in the world is being built in the United States, but the way it gets funded hasn't kept pace," said Remo Moomiaie-Qajar, founder and CEO of Axiom.
The Hong Kong exchange's stricter listing standards compared to the U.S. point to a mature biotech ecosystem, Moomiaie-Qajar told CNBC, while noting that recent biopharma listings in the city have outperformed those on the Nasdaq.
Public markets offer an alternative way to raise money as biotech firms face a tougher fundraising environment, he said. While clinical trials become more expensive as they progress, the pool of venture investors willing and able to write large checks gets smaller – especially for companies that did not secure major backers early on, he added.
Chinese biotech firms have flocked to the city's bourse amid a government push and as innovative drugmakers' financing needs grow. The Hang Seng Biotech Index in Hong Kong has climbed more than 75% since January 2025, surpassing the roughly 40%-50% gains in the ICE Biotechnology Index and the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index, tracking U.S.-listed firms during the same period, according to LSEG data.
"The U.S. remains the deepest and most institutionalized biotech capital pool in the world," said Danny Xiang, founding partner at the life science-focused private equity firm Fontus Capital. "That depth is precisely why the most fundable, globally competitive assets still raise and list in the U.S.," and why it's rare for a purely American biotech firm to choose Hong Kong as its primary venue, he said.
What's changed, however, is Hong Kong's growing appeal as one of the world's largest biotech fundraising hubs, with more than 70 listings in the sector and reforms introduced last year that streamlined their IPO process, Xiang said.
Global biotech firms are increasingly drawn to the city's expanding biopharma investor base and its proximity to Chinese pharmaceutical partners, which could help speed up clinical trials and lower costs.
Still, Xiang said, local investors tend to favor companies with a clear China connection, backing assets where they see opportunities to co-develop, manufacture or sell products with Chinese partners.
George Wu, a Hong Kong-based partner at law firm DLA Piper, said the Hong Kong biotech sector's lower valuations, relative to the Nasdaq, have also attracted more international investors seeking upside potential.
The U.S. is also on track for its strongest run of biotech IPOs in years, with both Parabilis Medicines, a clinical-stage cancer drug developer, and Kailera Therapeutics, an obesity-drug maker, soaring around 60% on their debuts earlier this year, after raising more than $600 million each. The SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) rallied 76% over the trailing year as of Tuesday.
Inventing vs. scalingBiotechnology has been a long-term priority for Beijing, which has spent decades funding basic research, reforming drug regulation, and attracting experienced scientists and executives trained abroad, including the U.S., back to China.
Lower labor and manufacturing costs, a deep pool of science graduates, access to large datasets, targeted uses of AI in areas such as drug design, and China's vast population – with many patients concentrated at major hospitals that can aid clinical-trial recruitment – have helped China advance in biologics, genomics and drug development, experts say.
However, a survey by the Cure Innovation Index in June found that despite leading in clinical development and supply chains, China still lags the U.S. in the quality, commercial reach and cutting-edge strength of its biomedical science.
"The U.S. leads '0-to-1'," in breakthroughs in foundational science and novel biology, Xiang said, while China increasingly leads "1-to-100," meaning fast, capital-efficient implementation to reach patients.
watch now
Axiom is co-developing a therapy with South Korea-based biopharma firm Medinno for newborns with severe brain injuries linked to high death rates. The therapy has received two U.S. Federal Drug Administration designations for rare pediatric diseases, and a Phase 1 trial involving nine newborns in South Korea has been completed.
Axiom also plans to study the treatment as a possible therapy for adults who have suffered strokes.
"Because there are no regenerative therapies for these brain injuries, it's imperative that we move through clinical trials as rapidly as possible. And I think Asia is the right place to do that," Moomiaie-Qajar told CNBC.
China closing inIn December, a bipartisan U.S. legislative commission warned that China was beginning to outpace the U.S. in some areas of biopharmaceutical innovation, building on "advantages gained from non-market practices and brute force economics" – a term used by some in Washington to describe China's state-led push for leadership in strategic industries.
The commission urged coordinated action across the public and private sectors to retain – and in some areas regain – U.S. biotechnology leadership.
Washington has moved against prominent Chinese biotech firms in recent years.
The Commerce Department has imposed export restrictions on several entities linked to genomics giant BGI Group, while the Pentagon last month added the pharmaceutical company WuXi AppTec to its list of firms that it alleges have ties to the Chinese military. WuXi sued the Department of Defense days later, seeking to overturn what it called an erroneous designation.
While Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange allow biotech firms to apply for a listing before they generate revenue or begin human testing, Hong Kong requires at least 12 months of research and development and a core product past the concept stage.
"A U.S. IPO is generally faster for a company that qualifies, and Hong Kong's review times have stretched as applications piled up," Xiang said.
In June 2013, Sony's PlayStation put out a short video demonstrating how easy it was to share games on PlayStation.
Then-Sony executive Shuhei Yoshida handed a disc to colleague Adam Boyes, and that was it. But it was viewed as more than just a simple instruction, it was seen as a dig at rival Microsoft Xbox's strict game-sharing policies.
"Trade in the game at retail. Sell it to another person. Lend it to a friend, or keep it forever," then-President and CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment America Jack Tretton said at a conference that same year. "When a gamer buys a PS4 disc, they have the rights to use that copy of the game."
The line sparked a standing ovation and helped intensify the backlash that led Xbox to roll back its restrictive policies.
Now, in the eyes of some, Sony is becoming the very villain it mocked.
PlayStation has announced it will end physical disc production for new games released on its consoles starting in January 2028, making new releases digital-only.
Boxed retail versions, if they are sold, will contain a download code rather than a disc.
One of the first games that will use this model is reportedly Take-Two Interactive's highly anticipated Grand Theft Auto 6, published by Rockstar Games and slated for release this year.
The economics are in Sony's favor. By selling more games digitally, the company has less need to manufacture physical boxes, and physical discs are eliminated completely, improving profit margins.
Michael Pachter, managing director of strategic planning at Wedbush Securities, told CNBC that the move will save Sony a bit of money, but "there can be no question that the consumer pays the tax in terms of less optionality."
A disc can be resold, traded in, lent to a friend, given as a gift, kept on a shelf, or preserved after a storefront shuts down. A download code cannot do any of that.
Without physical discs, gamers lose the ability to buy cheaper used games or recoup money from games they have finished. The change will give Sony a tighter grip on where games are sold, when they are discounted and how long consumers can access them.
"This is a truly ironic turn of events," Kazunori Ito, director of equity research at Morningstar, told CNBC. Sony won goodwill in 2013 by presenting physical discs as the "simple, consumer-friendly option," he said.
On YouTube, gamers resurfaced Sony's old clips with bitter comments: "This is like watching the wedding video after the divorce," one wrote. "Oh, how the mighty have fallen," wrote another.
Existing physical games, and titles released on disc before the cutoff, will not be affected.
"This is an extremely anti-consumer decision that has no legitimate justification and communicates a disdain for players in their ecosystem," Michael Futter, founder of video game industry consultancy F-Squared, told CNBC.
For Futter, the issue is that consoles are closed ecosystems, controlled by the platform holder. On PC, players can buy games through other marketplaces like Steam or the Epic Games Store.
"Sony would love for us to believe that the PC market's shift to digital is the exact same thing as consoles going down that path. It simply isn't," Futter said.
"There is an important difference between players accepting that shift because they see value in it, and having it effectively forced on them by taking away the alternative."
Kazunori Ito
Director of Equity Research, Morningstar
Sony and Playstation did not respond to CNBC's queries for comment.
Resale market declineSony's move has direct implications for the second-hand gaming economy. Dataintelo estimates the global second-hand game platform market, including pre-owned games, consoles, accessories and peripherals, was worth $7.2 billion in 2025 and will reach $13.8 billion by 2034.
"Realistically, at least 1/3 of games have been sold historically as used, and the games that were sold used also provided currency to the gamer who traded them in as cash to pay for new games," Wedbush's Patcher said. "Brick and mortar game retail is doomed."
While older games can still circulate even after disc production ceases, that's not possible with digital ones.
Morningstar's Ito expects the second-hand market for games to "keep shrinking and eventually disappear."
Developers will have less flexibility over discounting than PC platforms, where games can be sold across Steam, Epic Games Store, GOG and other stores, according to Futter.
However, Sony's defenders might argue that the market has changed since 2013. Sony's results for full-year 2025 showed that revenue from PlayStation 4 and 5 physical games is almost 10 times less than the revenue from digital downloads of full games.
Sony said in its announcement that the decision was a "natural direction for Sony Interactive Entertainment to adapt to consumer trends as the general preference for digital media significantly outpaces physical discs."
Separately, over 500 previously purchased movies will be removed from users' PlayStation libraries because of licensing agreements, with Sony's notice making no mention of compensation.
Still, some were wary of what this step could lead to eventually.
"What's to stop PlayStation from taking the same actions with games we've purchased?" Futter posited.
Ito expressed concern also.
"There is an important difference between players accepting that shift because they see value in it, and having it effectively forced on them by taking away the alternative," he said.
"Most would prefer to make that transition in their own way and at their own pace, rather than having it driven by the end of physical discs," he added.
On July 21, 2026, Wayfair Inc (W) shares fell 3.4% to close at $84.81. The stock has been under pressure, now trading within a 52-week range of $55.01 to $119.9
AbbVie (ABBV +1.07%) has performed fairly well this year despite significant volatility. The company's shares are up 10%, slightly above the S&P 500's 8% return. Will the healthcare leader maintain this momentum? Some may worry that AbbVie faces significant near-term risks, given the continued sales decline of its former best-selling drug, Humira, which has been off patent for several years. No one expects Humira to post revenue growth, but depending on how quickly it loses market share to biosimilars and whether or not AbbVie's other growth drivers are making enough progress to fill that gaping hole, the company's shares may fall.
Further, AbbVie is facing pricing pressure for its cancer medicine, Imbruvica, due to government-led price negotiations in the U.S. These headwinds may harm the stock's performance. However, for investors focused on the long game, there are still great reasons to invest in AbbVie. Let's consider three of them.
Image source: The Motley Fool.
1. AbbVie's main growth pillars AbbVie didn't take long to resume revenue growth after losing patent exclusivity for Humira in 2023. It posted decent sales growth the following year, which is quite impressive given that Humira is the best-selling medicine in the pharmaceutical industry's history. Many drugmakers spend several years recording declining revenue after losing patent exclusivity for medicines that aren't nearly as successful as Humira was.
AbbVie was able to bounce back quickly thanks to a diversified lineup across many therapeutic areas, but the two most important medicines in the company's portfolio -- by some margin -- are Skyrizi and Rinvoq, two immunology drugs. Skyrizi and Rinvoq have earned indications across many of Humira's old ones. They have performed so well that they have even surprised management.
Consider, for instance, that AbbVie expects combined revenue from Skyrizi and Rinvoq to exceed $31 billion this year, even though the company originally expected $27 billion in sales in 2027. The good news is that Skyrizi and Rinvoq shouldn't start facing biosimilar competition until 2033 at the earliest. In the meantime, they should continue driving excellent top-line growth. So, AbbVie's medium-term outlook is bright.
Today's Change
(
1.07
%) $
2.72
Current Price
$
256.10
2. AbbVie's deep pipeline AbbVie is already planning for life after Skyrizi and Rinvoq. The company boasts a deep product pipeline, including candidates it has licensed from other companies or inherited through acquisitions. Several of AbbVie's candidates look particularly promising. Let's consider two of them. First, AbbVie is developing ABBV-295, an investigational weight loss therapy. In March, the company released data from a phase 1 study for this candidate. AbbVie reported that ABBV-295 led to weight loss of 7.86% to 9.73% after 13 weeks when administered every other week for the first 5 weeks, then monthly thereafter.
These are highly encouraging results over such a short period, and the fact that ABBV-295 could be administered monthly makes it even more promising, since current weight loss options are administered weekly. Analysts predict that the weight-loss market will exceed $100 billion by the next decade, making this a potentially highly lucrative area for AbbVie, provided it can make significant progress with ABBV-295. Elsewhere, AbbVie recently announced the acquisition of Apogee Therapeutics (APGE +0.08%) for $10.9 billion in cash. The key asset from this acquisition is zumilokibart.
This investigational therapy targets eczema and other immunology conditions. One of zumilokibart's main differentiators is its dosing schedule: It could be administered every three or six months after induction, whereas many of the leading medicines in this niche are administered monthly. zumilokibart could help AbbVie deepen its strong position in immunology and, eventually, help it move beyond Skyrizi and Rinvoq.
3. The dividend remains strong One great reason to invest in AbbVie is its fantastic dividend program. When counting the time it spent as a division of its former parent company, Abbott Laboratories (ABT 1.96%), AbbVie is a Dividend King. Those are corporations that have increased their payouts for 50 or more consecutive years. AbbVie has been a great dividend stock since it split from Abbott in 2013. The company has hiked its dividends by an impressive 203.5% over the past decade. It also offers a forward yield of 2.7%, above the S&P 500's average of about 1.1%. AbbVie's dividend program makes the stock that much more attractive. The company could deliver excellent returns over the long run, especially with dividends reinvested.
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - July 21, 2026) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of Roblox Corporation (NYSE: RBLX) between October 30, 2025 and April 30, 2026, inclusive (the "Class Period"), of the important August 7, 2026 lead plaintiff deadline.
SO WHAT: If you purchased Roblox common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Roblox class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/roblox-corporation-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 7, 2026. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually handle securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm has achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered billions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the complaint, defendants provided overwhelmingly positive statements to investors while, at the same time, disseminating materially false and misleading statements and/or concealing material adverse facts concerning the true state of Roblox's organic growth potential; notably, that Roblox would see a significant slowdown in its growth rates as enrollment in the age verification rollout would quickly taper, compounding the resulting slowdown in on-platform communication, resulting in app store rating reductions and a swift reduction in organic growth. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Roblox class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/cases/roblox-corporation-2026/join or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/306055
Source: The Rosen Law Firm PA
Ready to Announce with Confidence? Send us a message and a member of our TMX Newsfile team will contact you to discuss your needs.
For the quarter ended June 2026, Chubb (CB - Free Report) reported revenue of $15.77 billion, up 6.5% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $7.26, compared to $6.14 in the year-ago quarter.
The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $15.9 billion, representing a surprise of -0.8%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +9.5%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $6.63.
While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.
Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.
Here is how Chubb performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:
Loss and loss expense ratio: 56.7% versus 58.3% estimated by seven analysts on average.Combined ratio: 83.8% versus 85.5% estimated by seven analysts on average.North America Agricultural Insurance - Combined ratio: 89.7% versus 89.4% estimated by six analysts on average.North America Agricultural Insurance - Loss and loss expense ratio: 82% compared to the 82% average estimate based on six analysts.Net premiums written- North American Personal P&C Insurance: $2.05 billion compared to the $2.04 billion average estimate based on six analysts. The reported number represents a change of +6% year over year.Adjusted Net investment income- Overseas General Insurance: $313 million compared to the $308.11 million average estimate based on six analysts. The reported number represents a change of +12.6% year over year.Adjusted Net investment income- Global Reinsurance: $110 million versus the six-analyst average estimate of $95.14 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +29.4%.Net premiums written- Total P&C: $12.77 billion versus $13.01 billion estimated by six analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3% change.Net premiums written- Global Reinsurance: $354 million compared to the $365.08 million average estimate based on six analysts. The reported number represents a change of -6.8% year over year.Net premiums written- Overseas General Insurance: $3.99 billion versus the six-analyst average estimate of $4 billion. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +10.2%.Adjusted Net investment income- North America Agricultural Insurance: $21 million versus $23.99 million estimated by six analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +10.5% change.Net premiums earned- Total P&C (Property and Casualty): $11.96 billion compared to the $12.06 billion average estimate based on six analysts. The reported number represents a change of +5.5% year over year.View all Key Company Metrics for Chubb here>>>
Shares of Chubb have returned +8.4% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -0.6% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
Salman Hassan Khan, the chief financial officer of MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA +4.97%), reported a sale of 16,000 shares of common stock on July 17, 2026, according to a recent SEC Form 4 filing.
Transaction summaryMetricValueShares sold (indirectly held)16,000Transaction value$174,400Post-transaction shares (directly held)1,670,140Post-transaction shares (indirectly held)393,066Post-transaction value$22.06 millionTransaction value based on SEC Form 4 weighted average sale price ($10.90); post-transaction value based on July 17, 2026 market close ($10.69).
Key questionsWhat was the mechanism governing this transaction?
The sale was executed pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan adopted on September 11, 2025. This allows insiders to set up a predetermined schedule for selling shares to avoid concerns about trading on non-public information.How does this sale affect Salman Hassan Khan's long-term exposure to the company?
Despite the disposition of 16,000 shares, the CFO maintains a substantial equity position of about 2.1 million total shares. His direct holdings of 1.7 million shares remain unchanged by this transaction.What is the recent performance context for the stock?
As of the transaction date, shares have seen a one-year decline of roughly 35%. The broader company context includes a trailing twelve-month net loss of $2.0 billion.Who are the beneficiaries of the indirect holdings?
The shares sold were held by the S & N Khan Family Trust. The reporting person and his spouse act as trustees, while immediate family members are the sole beneficiaries of this entity.Company OverviewMetricValueShare Price (as of market close 2026-07-17)$12.25Market Capitalization$4.7 billionRevenue (TTM)$867.8 millionNet Income (TTM)-$2.0 billionCompany SnapshotMARA Holdings operates as a digital asset technology company focused on Bitcoin mining, generating revenue through the ownership and operation of Bitcoin mining facilities, the sale of proprietary software and technology to third-party Bitcoin ecosystem operators, and the provision of advisory and consulting services to support Bitcoin mining ventures across domestic and international jurisdictions.The company's business model centers on deploying capital-intensive mining infrastructure powered by renewable energy resources, leveraging technological innovation to optimize mining operations, and monetizing intellectual property and expertise through software licensing and strategic advisory services.MARA Holdings serves institutional investors, cryptocurrency ecosystem participants, and energy companies seeking exposure to Bitcoin mining, targeting both domestic and international markets with a focus on sustainable, technology-enabled mining operations.MARA Holdings, Inc. is a substantial participant in the Bitcoin mining sector, positioning it as a significant infrastructure provider within the digital asset ecosystem. The company differentiates itself through its integration of renewable energy resources, proprietary mining technology, and advisory capabilities, enabling it to serve as both an operational mining enterprise and a technology solutions provider to the broader Bitcoin mining industry. Despite current profitability challenges reflected in a TTM net loss of $2.0 billion, the company maintains a strategic focus on long-term value creation within the evolving cryptocurrency infrastructure landscape.
What this transaction means for investorsThe shares were sold through the S & N Khan Family Trust, not his personal holdings, and trust assets can be managed for estate and family purposes on timelines that have nothing to do with where a stock trades day to day, or month to month. Plus, the plan behind it was set last September, and his combined position still runs to roughly 2.1 million shares.
As finance chief, Khan has been steering the company through a real pivot. First-quarter revenue fell 18% to $174.6 million, which he attributed on the latest earnings call to "an 18% decrease in Bitcoin's average price." However, MARA is now pushing into artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, buying French data center operator Exaion for $168 million in cash up front and cutting about 15% of its workforce at a cost of $45.9 million. It refinanced its credit line down to 7% from 10.5%, with $513.7 million in cash on hand. Long-term, the ongoing pivot will be a determinantfactor. Mining revenue rises and falls with Bitcoin, but data center contracts don't, and whether MARA can build a second business is the open question.
Jonathan Ponciano has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
On July 21, 2026, Hecla Mining Co HL shares rose 7.0% to a current price of $15.29. Despite today's positive movement, the stock has experienced significant volatility over the past year, with a 52-week range between $5.62 and $34.17.
GF Value™ verdict: Current price is $15.29 vs GF Value™ of $9.66, indicating a 58.3% overvaluation.GF Score™ of 67/100 suggests the stock is above average in terms of overall quality.Notable signal: The company has had no insider transactions in the last 3 months. Is HL Overvalued or Undervalued? Hecla Mining Co's current stock price of $15.29 is significantly above the GF Value™ estimate of $9.66, marking the shares as 58.3% overvalued. This discrepancy indicates that the stock may not offer a sufficient margin of safety for new investors, as the current pricing suggests that the market has higher expectations for the company's future performance than what is supported by its intrinsic value. The GF Valuation label classifies HL as significantly overvalued, which raises the risk for potential declines in stock price, especially if future performance does not meet market expectations.
GF Value™ is GuruFocus' proprietary measure of intrinsic value, calculated from historical trading multiples, past business growth, and future performance estimates. Given the current valuation, potential investors should proceed with caution, as the high valuation suggests a risk of correction, particularly in volatile market conditions.
How Does HL's Valuation Compare to Its History? Metric Current Historical P/E (TTM) 37.3x 65.2x Forward P/E 15.6x N/A Hecla Mining Co's current P/E (TTM) of 37.3x is significantly below its 5-year median P/E of 65.2x, which indicates that the stock is trading below its historical valuation. Despite this lowered P/E ratio, it still aligns with the GF Value™ verdict of being overvalued. This suggests that while the stock may appear more attractive than its past valuations, the intrinsic value still does not justify the current market price.
What Does HL's GF Score™ Tell Us? Metric Rating GF Score™ 67/100 Financial Strength 9/10 Profitability 6/10 Growth 3/10 Valuation 3/10 Momentum 6/10 The GF Score™ of 67/100 indicates that Hecla Mining Co has above-average quality based on various metrics. The strongest area is its Financial Strength, rated 9/10, suggesting a solid balance sheet and low financial risk. Conversely, the weakest area is Growth, with a score of 3/10, which implies limited growth prospects. The Valuation rank also stands at 3/10, reinforcing the concerns raised by the GF Value™ assessment regarding the stock's current pricing.
What Are Insiders Doing with HL Stock? There have been no insider transactions reported in the last 3 months for Hecla Mining Co. This lack of insider activity may suggest that management does not believe the current share price reflects a significant investment opportunity, or it could indicate a wait-and-see approach among insiders concerning the company’s future performance. Such inactivity might also signal a lack of confidence in the stock's valuation at this time.
What This Means for Investors Based on the GF Value™ assessment, Hecla Mining Co is currently overvalued, with a significant gap between its market price and intrinsic value. This situation suggests caution for potential investors, as the high valuation may expose them to greater risks in the event of market corrections.
For the complete analysis, visit the Hecla Mining Co HL stock page. You can also explore the GF Value™ page for detailed valuation methodology, or use the GuruFocus Stock Screener to find similar opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions What is HL's GF Score™?
HL has a GF Score™ of 67/100, indicating that it is above average based on GuruFocus' quality metrics.
Is HL overvalued or undervalued?
HL is currently overvalued, with a GF Value™ of $9.66 compared to its current price of $15.29, suggesting a 58.3% overvaluation.
What is HL's P/E ratio?
HL's P/E (TTM) is 37.3x, which is significantly below its 5-year median P/E of 65.2x, indicating the stock is trading below its historical valuation.
This stock alert was generated using automated technology and GuruFocus financial data to provide readers with timely and accurate market reporting. This content was reviewed by GuruFocus editorial team prior to publication. Please send any questions or comments about this story to [email protected].
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Zynex, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZYXI) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
According to a federal securities lawsuit, Zynex misled investors about the Company's business, operations, and prospects, specifically failing to disclose: (1) that Zynex shipped products, including electrodes, in excess of need; (2) that, as a result of this practice, the Company inflated its revenue; (3) that the Company's practice of filing false claims drew scrutiny from insurers, including Tricare; (4) that, as a result, it was reasonably likely that Zynex would face adverse consequences, including removal from insurer networks and penalties from the federal government; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
If you currently own ZYXI and purchased prior to March 13, 2023 please contact Sophia Anne Silayan by email at [email protected] or call (833) 672-0814. Kuehn Law pays all case costs and does not charge its investor clients. Shareholders should contact the firm immediately as there may be limited time to enforce your rights.
Why Your Participation Matters:
As a shareholder your voice matters, and by getting involved, you contribute to the integrity and fairness of the financial markets. Your investment. Your voice. Your future.™
Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY - Free Report) ended the recent trading session at $6.05, demonstrating a +1.6% change from the preceding day's closing price. The stock's performance was ahead of the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.89%. At the same time, the Dow added 0.74%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained 1.29%.
Coming into today, shares of the company had lost 30.33% in the past month. In that same time, the Oils-Energy sector gained 4.15%, while the S&P 500 lost 0.63%.
Market participants will be closely following the financial results of Array Technologies, Inc. in its upcoming release. The company plans to announce its earnings on August 5, 2026. It is anticipated that the company will report an EPS of $0.11, marking a 56% fall compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Alongside, our most recent consensus estimate is anticipating revenue of $323.84 million, indicating a 10.6% downward movement from the same quarter last year.
In terms of the entire fiscal year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates predict earnings of $0.73 per share and a revenue of $1.45 billion, indicating changes of +8.96% and +13.02%, respectively, from the former year.
Investors should also note any recent changes to analyst estimates for Array Technologies, Inc. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability.
Our research reveals that these estimate alterations are directly linked with the stock price performance in the near future. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, running from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), holds an admirable track record of superior performance, independently audited, with #1 stocks contributing an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the past month, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 1.83% higher. As of now, Array Technologies, Inc. holds a Zacks Rank of #1 (Strong Buy).
In terms of valuation, Array Technologies, Inc. is currently trading at a Forward P/E ratio of 8.17. This signifies a discount in comparison to the average Forward P/E of 18.81 for its industry.
It is also worth noting that ARRY currently has a PEG ratio of 0.7. This metric is used similarly to the famous P/E ratio, but the PEG ratio also takes into account the stock's expected earnings growth rate. The Solar was holding an average PEG ratio of 0.85 at yesterday's closing price.
The Solar industry is part of the Oils-Energy sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 57, positioning it in the top 24% of all 250+ industries.
The Zacks Industry Rank gauges the strength of our industry groups by measuring the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within the groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Ensure to harness Zacks.com to stay updated with all these stock-shifting metrics, among others, in the next trading sessions.
, /PRNewswire/ -- Kuehn Law, PLLC, a shareholder litigation law firm, is investigating whether certain officers and directors of Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ: ENPH) breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders.
According to a federal securities lawsuit, Enphase Energy misrepresented to investors that: (i) Enphase's European operations were experiencing rapid and robust growth; (ii) customer demand across major European markets, including the Netherlands and Germany, remained strong; (iii) any softness in those markets was temporary, with fundamentals remaining strong; and (iv) by early 2024, Europe had recovered and stabilized for Enphase's business purposes. According to the lawsuit, the Company also consistently minimized the effects that an influx of lower-priced Chinese competitors was having on Enphase's European operations.
If you currently own ENPH and purchased prior to April 25, 2023 please contact Sophia Anne Silayan by email at [email protected] or call (833) 672-0814. Kuehn Law pays all case costs and does not charge its investor clients. Shareholders should contact the firm immediately as there may be limited time to enforce your rights.
Why Your Participation Matters:
As a shareholder your voice matters, and by getting involved, you contribute to the integrity and fairness of the financial markets. Your investment. Your voice. Your future.™
On July 21, 2026, Viasat Inc (VSAT) shares rose 6.0% today, closing at $73.63. The stock has seen a remarkable price performance with a 52-week range between $1
On July 21, 2026, Dynatrace Inc (DT) shares fell 4.2% today, bringing the current price to $42.85. The stock has fluctuated between a 52-week high of $55.49 and
Dynatrace (DT - Free Report) closed the most recent trading day at $42.85, moving -4.16% from the previous trading session. This move lagged the S&P 500's daily gain of 0.89%. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 0.74%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, added 1.29%.
Shares of the software intellegence company witnessed a gain of 10.5% over the previous month, beating the performance of the Computer and Technology sector with its loss of 6.6%, and the S&P 500's loss of 0.63%.
The upcoming earnings release of Dynatrace will be of great interest to investors. The company is predicted to post an EPS of $0.45, indicating a 7.14% growth compared to the equivalent quarter last year. Simultaneously, our latest consensus estimate expects the revenue to be $549.3 million, showing a 15.07% escalation compared to the year-ago quarter.
Regarding the entire year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates forecast earnings of $1.95 per share and revenue of $2.33 billion, indicating changes of +14.71% and +15.23%, respectively, compared to the previous year.
Investors should also take note of any recent adjustments to analyst estimates for Dynatrace. Recent revisions tend to reflect the latest near-term business trends. As a result, we can interpret positive estimate revisions as a good sign for the business outlook.
Our research reveals that these estimate alterations are directly linked with the stock price performance in the near future. To take advantage of this, we've established the Zacks Rank, an exclusive model that considers these estimated changes and delivers an operational rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, spanning from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), boasts an impressive track record of outperformance, audited externally, with #1 ranked stocks yielding an average annual return of +25% since 1988. Over the past month, there's been a 0.22% fall in the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. Dynatrace is currently a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Investors should also note Dynatrace's current valuation metrics, including its Forward P/E ratio of 22.97. Its industry sports an average Forward P/E of 12.98, so one might conclude that Dynatrace is trading at a premium comparatively.
Investors should also note that DT has a PEG ratio of 1.65 right now. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. Computers - IT Services stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 0.99 based on yesterday's closing prices.
The Computers - IT Services industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. Currently, this industry holds a Zacks Industry Rank of 68, positioning it in the top 28% of all 250+ industries.
The strength of our individual industry groups is measured by the Zacks Industry Rank, which is calculated based on the average Zacks Rank of the individual stocks within these groups. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Make sure to utilize Zacks.com to follow all of these stock-moving metrics, and more, in the coming trading sessions.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) Q2 2026 Earnings Call July 21, 2026 4:30 PM EDT
Company Participants
Nancy Stuebe - Director of Investor Relations
Paul Brody - CFO, Treasurer, Secretary & Director
Thomas Peterffy - Founder & Chairman
Milan Galik - President, CEO & Director
Conference Call Participants
Steven Chubak - Wolfe Research, LLC
James Yaro - Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Research Division
Patrick Moley - Piper Sandler & Co., Research Division
Benjamin Budish - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division
Daniel Fannon - Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Brennan Hawken - BMO Capital Markets Equity Research
Christopher Allen - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Good day, everyone, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Interactive Brokers Group Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Now it's my pleasure to turn the call to Nancy Stuebe, Director of Investor Relations. Please proceed.
Nancy Stuebe
Director of Investor Relations
Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2026 earnings call. Joining us today are Thomas Peterffy, our Founder and Chairman; Milan Galik, our President and CEO; and Paul Brody, our CFO. I will be presenting Milan's comments on the business, and all 3 will be available at our Q&A. As a reminder, today's call may include forward-looking statements, which represent the company's belief regarding future events, which, by their nature, are not certain and are outside of the company's control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from what is indicated in these forward-looking statements.
We ask that you refer to the disclaimers in our press release. You should also review a description of risk factors contained in our financial reports filed with the SEC. The S&P 500 was up nearly 15% in the second quarter as markets rose strongly in April and May on the back of strong
On July 21, 2026, Zions Bancorp NA (ZION) shares fell 4.0% to a current price of $69.06. This drop comes amid a 52-week range of $46.19 to $73.34, reflecting si
Waste Management (WM - Free Report) ended the recent trading session at $233.18, demonstrating a -2.46% change from the preceding day's closing price. The stock fell short of the S&P 500, which registered a gain of 0.89% for the day. At the same time, the Dow added 0.74%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq gained 1.29%.
The stock of garbage and recycling hauler has risen by 12.07% in the past month, leading the Business Services sector's gain of 4.27% and the S&P 500's loss of 0.63%.
Analysts and investors alike will be keeping a close eye on the performance of Waste Management in its upcoming earnings disclosure. The company's earnings report is set to go public on July 28, 2026. The company's earnings per share (EPS) are projected to be $2, reflecting a 4.17% increase from the same quarter last year. Meanwhile, our latest consensus estimate is calling for revenue of $6.71 billion, up 4.32% from the prior-year quarter.
For the full year, the Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $8.16 per share and revenue of $26.53 billion, which would represent changes of +8.8% and +5.26%, respectively, from the prior year.
Additionally, investors should keep an eye on any recent revisions to analyst forecasts for Waste Management. Such recent modifications usually signify the changing landscape of near-term business trends. Hence, positive alterations in estimates signify analyst optimism regarding the business and profitability.
Our research demonstrates that these adjustments in estimates directly associate with imminent stock price performance. We developed the Zacks Rank to capitalize on this phenomenon. Our system takes these estimate changes into account and delivers a clear, actionable rating model.
The Zacks Rank system, stretching from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), has a noteworthy track record of outperforming, validated by third-party audits, with stocks rated #1 producing an average annual return of +25% since the year 1988. Over the past month, the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has shifted 0.03% upward. Waste Management is currently a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
In terms of valuation, Waste Management is currently trading at a Forward P/E ratio of 29.31. This expresses a premium compared to the average Forward P/E of 27.37 of its industry.
It's also important to note that WM currently trades at a PEG ratio of 2.91. Comparable to the widely accepted P/E ratio, the PEG ratio also accounts for the company's projected earnings growth. Waste Removal Services stocks are, on average, holding a PEG ratio of 2.62 based on yesterday's closing prices.
The Waste Removal Services industry is part of the Business Services sector. This group has a Zacks Industry Rank of 79, putting it in the top 33% of all 250+ industries.
The Zacks Industry Rank is ordered from best to worst in terms of the average Zacks Rank of the individual companies within each of these sectors. Our research shows that the top 50% rated industries outperform the bottom half by a factor of 2 to 1.
Ensure to harness Zacks.com to stay updated with all these stock-shifting metrics, among others, in the next trading sessions.
