Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

pSTAKE Successfully Launches BTC Liquid Staking Testnet on Babylon to Unlock Bitcoin’s True Value

[deleted by user]
by
in
DefiKingdoms

Are you ready to dive into the world of crypto gaming? Let’s unpack the leading P2E games of 2024! From BlockDAG’s innovative TG Tap miner to the quirky The Meme Games, the pixel-rich adventure in DeFi Kingdoms, to the expansive realms of Decentraland, there’s a wealth of unique gaming experiences up for grabs. Not to forget the ever-popular CryptoKitties, still charming the gaming community. Whether you’re a veteran gamer or just dipping your toes into digital waters, these games offer both fun and a chance to pocket some earnings.

1. BlockDAG: Big Wins with TG Tap Miner! Keen on a game that marries top-notch technology with fun? Put BlockDAG on your radar. Leveraging Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) technology, BlockDAG marries Bitcoin’s robust security, Kaspa’s lightning speed, and Ethereum’s versatile interoperability. This trifecta has not only carved a significant niche in the crypto scene but also drummed up $72.4 million in presale funds, attracting over 120,000 unique holders.

BlockDAG’s foray into gaming introduces TG Tap Miner, a straightforward yet engaging play-to-earn clicker game on Telegram. Players tap away at falling balls within a minute, with different types of balls offering varying points — diamond balls rake in the highest points. Accumulated tap points can be exchanged for BDAG coins.

2. DeFi Kingdoms: A Trip Down Memory Lane with RPG Flair! Step into the pixel-art laden world of DeFi Kingdoms, a role-playing game set against a medieval backdrop. Here, players can embark on quests, trade, and mingle with others, all while earning in-game rewards. Its old-school pixel graphics whisk you back to the days of classic RPGs.

But it’s not just a pretty face; DeFi Kingdoms integrates decentralized finance, allowing you to farm, stake, and earn tokens as you play. This melding of RPG and DeFi elements delivers a gaming experience that’s as profitable as it is nostalgic.

3. CryptoKitties: The Enduring Allure of Digital Cats! Since its 2017 debut, CryptoKitties remains a staple in the P2E domain. In this game, players collect, breed, and trade virtual cats, each uniquely minted as an NFT. The simple joy of collecting these digital kitties and breeding new, unique offspring injects both strategy and fun into the experience, solidifying CryptoKitties’ role as a blockchain gaming pioneer.

4. Decentraland: Craft Your Virtual Destiny! Enter Decentraland: a sprawling, player-owned virtual world where creativity meets commerce. Launched in 2017, it’s grown into a leading P2E platform buzzing with activity. In Decentraland, players can buy plots of land, develop them into interactive experiences, and monetize their creations using the native MANA token, truly owning their virtual exploits.

5. The Meme Games: Win Big with Viral Fun! Drawing inspiration from the 2024 Paris Olympics, The Meme Games aim to be the unofficial meme token mascot of the event, especially among the degen crowd. This game fuses the viral nature of memes with the competitive spirit of the Olympics, offering a platform where players can earn by tackling various meme-centric challenges.

The Best P2E Games of 2024: Where Fun Meets Earnings! With trailblazers like BlockDAG setting new standards with their creative take on blockchain gaming, the future of gaming is not just arriving—it’s here. Whether you’re drawn to the nostalgia of DeFi Kingdoms, the vast possibilities in Decentraland, the meme magic of The Meme Games, or the collecting craze of CryptoKitties, there’s a slice of this vibrant gaming pie for everyone.

If one were to spotlight a standout, BlockDAG’s TG Tap Miner shines with its blend of simplicity, engagement, and profit potential. So gear up, jump into these games, and immerse yourself in the leading P2E games of 2024!

Disclaimer: TheNewsCrypto does not endorse any content on this page. The content depicted in this press release does not represent any investment advice. TheNewsCrypto recommend our readers to make decisions based on their own research. TheNewsCrypto is not accountable for any damage or loss related to content, products, or services stated in this press release.

Battle for the Kingdom: DeFi Kingdoms’ $75K Tournament Series Launches February 26th on Metis

Altcoins News: The latest update from the Token Unlocks App reveals that six altcoins are readying to take the heat of increased market supply in the upcoming week. This is attributable to massive token unlocks, a phenomenon wherein previously locked tokens are released periodically into the market.

Notably, $138.8 million worth of cliff unlocks are looming to hit certain altcoins in the coming days. These tokens include AltLayer (ALT), Sace ID (ID), Ethena (ENA), Galxe (GAL), Yield Guild games (YGG) and Acala (ACA).

Here’s a brief report on the token unlocks that may serve as important Altcoin news for crypto market participants.

AltLayer (ALT) The AltLayer crypto is set to witness an unlock of a staggering 684.21 million ALT, worth $111.01 million, on July 25. This is equivalent to 42.08% of the circulating supply, raising severe investor concerns over future market implications.

ALT price traded at $0.1619 at press time, up 5.29% over the past day. Its 24-hour lows and tops are $0.1572 and $0.1729, respectively.

Space ID (ID) The Space ID token will witness an unlock of 18.49 million ID, worth $9.01 million, on July 22. This equals 4.29% of the coin’s circulating supply.

ID price traded at $0.4875, an increase of 5.70% from yesterday. The token’s 24-hour lows and highs were $0.4607 and $0.5011, respectively.

Ethena (ENA) Ethena prepares for an unlock of 14.89 million ENA, worth $7.32 million, on July 21. This totals 0.87% of the coin’s circulating supply.

ENA price traded at $0.493 today, an upswing of 6.97% over the past day. Ethena’s 24-hour slumps and peaks were recorded as $0.4699 and $0.5116, respectively.

Yield Guild Games (YGG) The Yield Guild Games crypto will experience an unlock of 14.08 million YGG, worth $7.56 million, on July 27. This amounts to 3.74% of the coin’s circulating supply.

YGG price traded at $0.5369, up 2.97% over the past day. The token’s 24-hour bottoms and tops were $0.5183 and $0.555, respectively.

Also Read: $149 Million of Altcoins Sold By WazirX Hacker to Buy 43,799 Ethereum

Galxe (GAL) The altcoin Galxe readies for an unlock of 1 million GAL, worth $3.60 million, on July 24. This is equivalent to 0.85% of the circulating supply.

The GAL price rested at $3.58 today, a decline of 5.78% over the past day. Its 24-hour bottoms and highs were $3.54 and $3.92, respectively.

Acala (ACA) Acala is set to face an unlock of 4.66 million ACA, worth $340.03k, on July 25. This totals 0.46% of the coin’s circulating supply.

ACA price stood at $0.07291, an upsurge of 2.53% from yesterday. The cryptocurrency’s 24-hour bottoms and peaks were $0.07132 and $0.0759, respectively.

Notably, the abovementioned token unlocks remain much eyed by market participants as investor concerns persist over this altcoin news, primarily due to supply increase.

Also Read: SHIB News: Massive 2.7 Tln Accumulation Fuels Hope For Shiba Inu To $0.0000386

3 Token Unlocks to Watch Next Week

5 Token Unlocks to Watch Next Week

Bette Chen Started Acala After Leaving Her Safe Job

Polkadot (DOT) is preparing to launch a new stablecoin, pUSD, through the RFC-155 proposal. The Polkadot community is championing pUSD as a key solution to unleash its DeFi potential, cut dependence on USDT/USDC, and boost ecosystem autonomy.

However, some are concerned that they might repeat past mistakes. pUSD is an over-collateralized stablecoin fully backed by DOT, deployed on Asset Hub, and using the Honzon protocol developed by Acala. Acala is the former issuer of aUSD, a stablecoin project that failed disastrously.

Can pUSD Stablecoin Avoid the Same Fate as aUSD?Reusing Honzon – the framework Acala previously relied on to issue aUSD is raising concerns. That incident eroded trust in the Acala team, with some even accusing them of “blaming a hack” while failing to compensate users adequately.

“Acala’s stablecoin (aUSD) launch was a complete disaster and it really killed my trust in the team. I don’t see myself supporting their project anymore. What I’d love to see is a proper, reliable, native solution. Honestly, it’s frustrating that with all the talent in the Polkadot/Substrate space, nobody has managed to build something better yet.” – A community member shared.

Approval rate of the proposal at the time of writing. Source: PolkadotEven those who support Polkadot launching its native stablecoin still see Honzon and Acala as lessons that cannot be ignored. They propose the project should “move forward independently from the Acala team.” In addition, they call for the Technical Council to take clear responsibility for governance.

“With these assurances, I would be prepared to vote AYE. Without them, the risk of repeating past mistakes is too great.” Another member noted.

Too Many RisksSetting aside concerns about Honzon and the Acala team, Polkadot’s pUSD also faces skepticism within the community. One primary reason is the structure that DOT solely backs it.

While the exact overcollateralization ratio remains unclear, this could trigger liquidation cascades and add selling pressure on the token. Although the pUSD model is safer than Terra’s UST because it is overcollateralized, relying only on DOT as collateral introduces significant risks.

Previously, MakerDAO’s DAI also started as ETH-only collateral. But today, MakerDAO supports Multi-Collateral DAI (MCD). They allow users to back DAI with crypto assets such as ETH, WBTC, LINK, UNI, stETH, and even Real World Assets (RWAs) like US Treasuries.

“Backed only by DOT, which could trigger liquidation cascades and add additional selling pressure on the token. Remember the notorious DAI depeg in 2020, which forced MakerDAO to diversify its collateral.” A user on X commented.

Additionally, another X user pointed out that the Polkadot ecosystem already has more advanced native solutions like HOLLAR. The Hydration runtime builds this stablecoin, optimizes it for appchains, and positions it as superior to the legacy aUSD architecture. Therefore, many argue that instead of repeating a “regular” EVM model, Polkadot should leverage its unique strengths. This would enable the creation of a stable, secure solution worthy of its ecosystem’s potential.

pUSD is undoubtedly a strategic move by Polkadot to unlock DeFi potential. It could bring significant benefits if it proves secure and sees widespread adoption in the ecosystem. However, the ghost of aUSD’s failure continues to cast doubt within the community.

To avoid repeating the same mistakes, Polkadot must work to dispel those lingering concerns. The fact that the DOT supply is capped at 2.1 billion, as reported by BeInCrypto, could help fuel the ecosystem’s growth.

TLDR The Polkadot community is currently voting on the proposal to launch a native stablecoin backed by DOT tokens. Bryan Chen, co-founder of Acala, introduced the pUSD stablecoin proposal to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC. The pUSD proposal has gained 74.6% support but requires 79.7% approval to pass in the ongoing referendum. Community members remain divided over Acala’s involvement in the pUSD project due to the failure of aUSD Gavin Wood outlines a broader vision for stablecoins within Polkadot, emphasizing the benefits of using pUSD for validator rewards. The Polkadot community is currently voting on a major proposal to launch a native stablecoin, pUSD. This stablecoin would be entirely backed by DOT tokens, the network’s native cryptocurrency. The proposal has sparked a heated debate, drawing strong opinions both in favor and against the initiative. At present, the vote is ongoing, and it could significantly influence the future of the Polkadot network.

Polkadot’s Push for a Native Stablecoin Bryan Chen, co-founder of Acala, introduced the proposal for pUSD. The plan suggests launching the stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub using the Honzon protocol. Honzon had previously been used in Acala’s aUSD project, which faced a failed launch due to an exploit. Despite the past failure, Chen has emphasized the importance of Polkadot having a decentralized stablecoin to reduce its reliance on USDT and USDC.

Chen stated, “A native stablecoin will prevent Polkadot from losing liquidity to other chains that already have one.” He believes pUSD can maintain the network’s strategic advantage in the rapidly evolving blockchain ecosystem. Although over 74.6% of the votes are in favor of the stablecoin, the measure requires 79.7% approval to pass. With over $5.6 million in DOT already committed to the vote, the outcome remains uncertain.

Acala’s Memories and Community Doubts Despite the potential benefits of a native stablecoin, memories of Acala’s previous failure have caused skepticism. The aUSD project’s collapse in 2022 due to an exploit left a lasting impact on the community. Some members argue that Acala should not be entrusted with launching another stablecoin, given the risks involved.

A group known as TheGlobedotters expressed concerns, urging that Acala’s involvement should be avoided. Others, like The White Rabbit, have said they could support the proposal if Acala were excluded from its development. They also call for strict governance safeguards before any stablecoin is deployed.

Gavin Wood Outlines the Broader Vision for Polkadot Polkadot’s founder, Gavin Wood, has also weighed in on the stablecoin debate. He outlined a broader strategy that includes both fully collateralized stablecoins like pUSD and more flexible “stable-ish” assets. Wood believes a multi-approach strategy is necessary to address Polkadot’s volatility issues while stabilizing the network’s validator rewards.

Wood suggested that validators could be paid in pUSD instead of volatile DOT, which would stabilize their income. He argued that such a move would attract institutional participants and enhance Polkadot’s long-term security. “A DOT-backed stablecoin like pUSD could be key to strengthening Polkadot’s position,” Wood added.

Polkadot developers are weighing a DOT-backed stablecoin called pUSD, though Acala’s troubled history with aUSD has sparked community doubts.

(Photo of Sung Jin Cho on Unsplash)

Posted September 30, 2025 at 10:04 am EST.

The Polkadot community is considering the launch of a native DOT-backed algorithmic stablecoin called pUSD, with the aim of reducing reliance on external stablecoins like USDT and USDC.

The proposal, put forward by Acala CTO Bryan Chen, envisions pUSD as an overcollateralized debt token exclusively backed by DOT tokens that would operate on Acala’s decentralized Honzon protocol.

pUSD would be managed entirely by smart contracts, tracking a fiat currency peg using economic incentives and automated on-chain logic. The design aims to avoid the risks of mixed collateral models and centralized control.

This story is an excerpt from the Unchained Daily newsletter.

Subscribe here to get these updates in your email for free

Early voting on the proposal has shown over 75% support, with more than 1.1 million DOT, valued at about $4.3 million, already committed. However, some members of the community raised concerns around Acala leading the charge.

“Acala’s stablecoin (aUSD) launch was a complete disaster and it really killed my trust in the team. I don’t see myself supporting their project anymore,” said one user.

Acala’s aUSD stablecoin experienced a major depeg event due to a technical exploit in 2022 — a bug in the iBTC/aUSD liquidity pool allowed hackers to mint over 1.2 billion aUSD tokens without the necessary collateral.

If traditional finance got a blockchain makeover, DeFi protocols would inevitably be the result. Here, decentralized apps (DApps) and smart contracts reign supreme, offering you control over your financial future. 

From staking your digital assets for crypto yield to conducting anonymous crypto swaps, this guide introduces you to the top DeFi protocols to keep an eye on in 2026.

In This Guide:

12 Top DeFi protocols in 2026 DeFi protocols comparedWhat are DeFi protocols?How do DeFi protocols work?Should you use DeFi protocols?Could DeFi replace traditional finance?Frequently asked questions12 Top DeFi protocols in 2026

1. dYdX

Best DeFi protocol for liquid staking

Token

dYdX

Token max supply

1,000,000,000 DYDX

Market cap

$1.499B

TVL

$401.81M

The dYdX protocol provides advanced financial instruments like perpetual and margin trading within the DeFi ecosystem. The leading exchange operates without KYC, allowing for anonymous, trustless trading. It supports perpetual and margin trading, alongside lending and borrowing, and offers competitive fee structures and gas-free trading experiences.

The platform provides lower collateralization levels compared to competitors, increasing accessibility. dYdX also utilizes StarkWare for increased efficiency and lower transaction fees and allows for community contributions and governance.

Notably, dYdX also transitioned to an independent blockchain within the Cosmos ecosystem, enhancing performance and furthering decentralization.

Pros

Advanced trading options No KYC required Low fees Layer-2 scalability Dynamic interest rates Interoperability with Cosmos Cons

Complex for beginners Dependent on Ethereum Limited spot trading New chain transition challenges Ecosystem adaptation required Trade features: Perpetual trading, margin trading, decentralized order book, layer-2 scalability, cross-margin capabilities.

Earning features: Lending, borrowing, dynamic interest rates, trading rewards.

Security features: Self-custodial security, third-party audits, secured by Ethereum protocol.

Platform and ecosystem features: No KYC, open-source code, integration with Cosmos ecosystem, decentralized governance, off-chain order matching.

2. PancakeSwap

Best DeFi protocol for cost-effective transactions

Token

CAKE

Token max supply

450,000,000 CAKE

Market cap

$974.4M

TVL

$2.224B

PancakeSwap is a top-tier DeFi protocol. It focuses on the Binance Smart Chain blockchain, but supports a total of eight networks, including Ethereum.

PancakeSwap’s native crypto is CAKE, which has a total supply of 450 million tokens. This decentralized exchange leverages an automated market maker (AMM) model, allowing for direct, wallet-to-wallet trades without intermediaries, enhancing user control and security.

Moreover, it offers a range of services beyond simple trades, such as yield farming, staking, and lotteries, enabling users to earn rewards in various ways. Its user-friendly interface makes it accessible for beginners, while its innovative features, like the zkBridge technology, ensure secure and efficient transactions across different blockchain networks.

PancakeSwap’s growth is underscored by its status as the first billion-dollar project on the Binance Smart Chain and its continual upgrades, such as the current PancakeSwap V3, demonstrating its commitment to improving functionality and user experience.

Pros

Intuitive interface High APY for liquidity providers (LPs) Supports staking and farming NFT marketplace Cons

No mobile app No native crypto wallet Trade features: Instant crypto trading, liquidity pools, asset bridging, perpetual trading, and cryptocurrency purchasing.

Earning features: Farming, pools, liquid staking, simple staking.

Game and NFT features: Gaming marketplace, prediction market, NFT marketplace for NFTs on BNB Chain.

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance, initial farm offerings (IFOs), gauge voting and revenue sharing, and farm booster.

3. De.Fi

Best DeFi protocol for monitoring

Token

DEFI

Token max supply

1,000,000,000 DEFI

Market cap

n/a

TVL

n/a

De.Fi provides detailed smart contract analysis to detect potential vulnerabilities and assign security scores. It offers an extensive dashboard for monitoring wallet transactions and balances, alongside powerful investment tools for analyzing and controlling positions in DeFi protocols, NFT collections, and lending markets.

Additionally, De.Fi includes specialized security features like the De.Fi Shield and Scanner for thorough contract examination. It also comes with user-friendly transaction tools such as secure crypto sending and De.Fi Swap for easy cryptocurrency exchanges across various blockchains, making it a well-rounded solution for utilizing the DeFi space safely and effectively.

Pros

Advanced security scanning Comprehensive dashboard Real-time analytics User-friendly interface Multi-blockchain support Cons

Complexity for beginners Technical knowledge needed Frequent updates required Smart contract and security features: Vulnerability scanning, smart contract security scoring, De.Fi Shield, De.Fi Scanner.

Portfolio and transaction monitoring features: Comprehensive dashboard, address book, wallet balance tracking, deposited and loaned balances overview.

Investment and exploration features: Market analysis tools, NFT portfolio management, exploration of DeFi opportunities.

Security and protection tools: Asset security assessments, approval checks, risk highlights for tokens and NFTs, customizable security settings.

Transaction and exchange features: Secure cryptocurrency sending, De.Fi Swap, slippage tolerance settings.

4. Uniswap

Best DeFi protocol for community

Token

UNI

Token max supply

1,000,000,000 UNI

Market cap

$8.86B

TVL

$5.543B

Uniswap is another leading decentralized exchange. The native token is UNI, which has a total supply of 1 billion tokens.

Governed by its users through the UNI token, it offers a community-driven experience, unlike centralized platforms. Uniswap’s liquidity pools facilitate secure and direct token swaps, ensuring users maintain complete control over their funds. Originally built on Ethereum, it now supports other Ethereum-compatible networks like Polygon and Optimism, offering lower transaction costs.

Uniswap’s simplicity makes it accessible for beginners while providing advanced features for experienced users. This is rare when it comes to DEXs, which can often be tricky to use and less straightforward than their CEX counterparts. Uniswap also boasts broad token availability and deep liquidity, reducing price impact on large trades.

Additionally, the DEX has integrated NFT trading, enhancing its offerings. With nearly 5 million unique wallet addresses and surpassing $1 trillion in trading volume, its popularity and reliability are evident.

Finally, Uniswap’s swap fees are competitive, especially when compared to centralized exchanges, and users can choose cheaper networks to avoid high Ethereum gas fees.

Pros

Easy-to-use interface Low-cost trades Multiple blockchain networks supported Cons

No mobile app High fees when purchasing crypto (third-party services) Trade features: Instant crypto trading, liquidity pools, asset bridging, cryptocurrency purchasing.

Earning features: Funding liquidity pools, swap fee earnings.

Game and NFT features: NFT marketplace, prediction market.

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance, concentrated liquidity, transaction fee structure.

5. Curve Finance

Best DeFi protocol for stablecoins

Token

CRV

Token max supply

2,091,644,627 CRV

Market cap

$730.32M

TVL

$2.486B

Curve Finance is a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) on the Ethereum blockchain, specializing in the efficient trading of stablecoins and wrapped tokens like wBTC, renBTC, and sBTC. Founded by Michael Egorov, it has quickly risen to prominence, and is particularly famed for its innovative use of liquidity pools and automated market maker (AMM) systems. These allow users to earn high annual interest rates — over 300% in some pools — on deposited cryptocurrency.

The platform distinguishes itself with its unique bonding curve. This is optimized for stablecoins to reduce slippage, allowing significant trades with minimal price impact. This has positioned Curve as a vital component in the DeFi space, especially for those interested in liquidity mining and yield farming.

Curve Finance operates as a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), with its governance token CRV enabling holders to vote on changes and proposals. This shift to a DAO structure allows Curve to operate with enhanced transparency and community-driven development. Despite its complexity and the potential for impermanent loss, Curve Finance offers significant opportunities for liquidity providers and traders, underlined by security measures including multiple code audits and bug bounties to safeguard user assets.

Pros

Specializes in stablecoins Reduced slippage Governed by DAO Multiple security audits Bug bounties for added safety Cons

Complex for beginners Focused mainly on stablecoins and wrapped tokens Reliance on Ethereum blockchain, leading to potential high gas fees Trade features: Stablecoin specialization, efficient liquidity pools, unique bonding curve, minimal slippage in trades.

Earning features: High annual interest rates from liquidity pools, rewards in CRV tokens, participation in yield farming.

Security features: Multiple security audits, bug bounties, governed by decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via CRV token, high total value locked (TVL), support for various wrapped tokens.

6. Balancer

Best DeFi protocol for multi-tokens pools

Token

BAL

Token max supply

62,244,253 BAL

Market cap

$268.21M

TVL

$1.242B

Balancer is a versatile and innovative DeFi platform that redefines the concept of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) by combining elements of automated market makers (AMMs) and index funds.

Unlike traditional DEXs — which typically focus on two-token liquidity pools — Balancer’s USP lies in its ability to maintain a balanced portfolio through automatic rebalancing, adjusting the pool’s asset allocations in response to market price changes.

Balancer supports three types of pools: public pools, where anyone can add liquidity and earn trading fees; private pools, where only the creator can contribute liquidity and set parameters; and smart pools, which are private pools with adjustable parameters controlled by a smart contract. This flexibility caters to a wide range of user preferences and risk tolerances.

Furthermore, Balancer’s architecture is designed to function on Ethereum and also on six additional blockchain networks, expanding its accessibility and interoperability within DeFi ecosystems. By providing a decentralized platform for multi-asset liquidity, Balancer contributes significantly to the efficiency of the cryptocurrency market.

Pros

Multi-token pools Automated rebalancing Interoperability Cons

Complex for beginners Limited on smaller chains Trade features: Multi-token pools, automated portfolio rebalancing, customizable pool types (public, private, smart), wide asset variety, minimal slippage through dynamic trading fees.

Earning features: Rewards in BAL tokens, high yield from liquidity provision, participation in liquidity mining, diversified income streams through various pool types.

Security features: Regular security audits, bug bounty programs, non-custodial asset management, transparent smart contract operations.

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via BAL token, significant total value locked (TVL), interoperability across multiple blockchains, support for a variety of digital assets and wrapped tokens.

7. Summer.fi

Best DeFi protocol for services

Token

Summer.fi

Token max supply

N/A

Market cap

N/A

TVL

$5.345b

Summer.fi, initially known as Oasis.app and one of the earliest MakerDAO projects from 2016, has evolved significantly beyond its original scope.

After Maker became fully decentralized, Summer.fi emerged as a standalone platform, dedicated to establishing a highly trusted application for DeFi capital deployment.

It now transcends being merely an interface for the Maker Protocol. It aims to be the most secure place for engaging with DeFi, providing users with advanced automation features like stop-loss, auto-buy, and auto-sell, as well as strategies such as Constant Multiples for optimizing Vault performance. If your Vault’s collateralization ratio hits your Sell Trigger, Constant Multiple will execute.

Summer.fi prioritizes user experience, offering clear insights into positions, returns, and associated risks, backed by a comprehensive knowledge base reflecting community feedback.

Pros

Comprehensive DeFi services Advanced automation features, (stop-loss, take-profit, auto-buy, etc.) User-friendly interface Integration with multiple protocols (Aave and Maker) Cons

Complex for new users Limited to ERC-20 tokens Borrowing features: Flexible repayment schedules, diverse collateral types, integrated with multiple protocols like Aave and Ajna, protection against market volatility through the Oracle Security Module and constant updates from Chainlink.

Multiplying features: Increase or decrease collateral exposure in one transaction, use borrowed funds to buy more collateral, integration with liquid platforms and the 1inch DEX aggregator for best execution prices, dedicated interface for managing positions.

Earning features: Self-custody solutions for yield earning, compatibility with Aave and Maker protocols, increase yield from StETH, participate in the Dai Savings Rate for passive income.

Automation features: Stop-loss to prevent liquidations, take-profit for efficient exits, auto-buy and auto-sell for Vault management, Constant Multiple to maintain predefined exposure levels.

Integration and partnerships: Support for various wallets like MetaMask and Ledger, integration with the 1inch Network for efficient token swaps, launched on Optimism layer-2 for reduced transaction costs, Ajna Protocol integration for curated borrowing and lending pools.

8. Aave

Best DeFi protocol for liquidity

Token

AAVE

Token max supply

16,000,000 AAVE

Market cap

$1.711B

TVL

$10.564B

Aave (AAVE) is a pioneering entity in the DeFi sector. The comprehensive lending platform boasts a significant Total Value Locked (TVL), which surpasses $10 billion in crypto collateral.

Aave enables users to lend and borrow a wide array of tokens across multiple ecosystems, ensuring a versatile and inclusive financial experience.

The platform’s latest iteration, Aave V3, expands its reach beyond Ethereum to include 10 different blockchain networks, further solidifying its position as a key player in DeFi by enhancing accessibility and providing a range of options for its diverse user base.

Pros

High TVL Wide range of tokens Multi-chain accessibility Flash loans availability Governance via AAVE token Cons

Complexity for beginners High gas fees on Ethereum Risk of liquidation Trade features: Flash loans, real-time interest accrual, stable and variable interest rates, Ethereum network integration, multi-asset collateral support.

Earning features: aTokens for deposit interest, decentralized lending and borrowing, yield optimization strategies, liquidity mining.

Security features: Over-collateralization of loans, smart contract audits, safety module for risk mitigation, bug bounties for platform integrity.

Platform and ecosystem features: Governance via AAVE tokens, layer-2 solutions for reduced fees, decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) structure, no KYC requirements, multi-chain accessibility.

9. MakerDAO

Best DeFi protocol for generating a stablecoin

Token

MKR

Token max supply

1,005,577 MKR

Market cap

$2.686B

TVL

$7B

MakerDAO is a pioneering DeFi platform that has revolutionized the way users engage with digital assets. The platform provides a decentralized borrowing and lending system with its stablecoin, DAI, at the core.

Built on the Ethereum blockchain, it allows users to leverage a variety of cryptocurrencies as collateral to generate DAI, maintaining stability through rigorous governance by MKR token holders.

The platform distinguishes itself with features like over-collateralization to ensure loan security, and a dual-rate model offering users the choice between stable and variable interest rates. However, users must navigate complexities such as liquidation risks and market volatility.

As MakerDAO evolves, it continues to solidify its status as a cornerstone of the DeFi landscape with the introduction of upgrades like V3 and the addition of the GHO stablecoin — balancing user empowerment with the intricate dynamics of decentralized finance.

Pros

Decentralized lending DAI stability Ethereum-based Governance by MKR Over-collateralization Variable interest rates Cons

Complexity High gas fees Liquidation risks Trade features: Flash loans, stable and variable interest rates, real-time aTokens, multi-currency collateral, governance-driven updates.

Earning features: Interest on deposits, participation in governance, yield farming opportunities, dynamic interest rates.

Security features: Over-collateralization, liquidation mechanisms, community governance for risk management, security modules for asset protection.

Platform and ecosystem features: Decentralized borrowing and lending, Ethereum-based, MKR token for governance, integration with multiple crypto assets, open-source development, Maker Vaults for asset management.

10. Compound Finance

Best DeFi protocol for staking

Token

COMP

Token max supply

10,000,000 COMP

Market cap

$487.27M

TVL

$2.668B

Compound Finance is a prominent decentralized lending platform operating on the Ethereum blockchain, known for pioneering the DeFi lending space.

Established by Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes in 2018, Compound simplifies the process of borrowing and lending cryptocurrencies without intermediaries, allowing over $2 billion in assets to be locked on its platform.

Unique for its innovations, such as yield farming and governance through COMP tokens, the platform aims to provide financial inclusion, eliminating traditional transaction minimums and credit checks.

While offering competitive returns through real-time interest rates, users engaging with Compound and its governance token, COMP, must be cautious of market volatility and conduct in-depth research prior to investment.

Pros

Decentralized borrowing and lending No transaction minimums User-friendly interface Supports multiple ERC-20 assets Yield farming opportunities Cons

Market volatility risks Requires over-collateralization Complexity for new users High gas fees on Ethereum Trade features: Real-time interest rate adjustments, supports diverse ERC-20 tokens, and a user-centric lending and borrowing system.

Earning features: Yield farming with COMP tokens, competitive APR for lenders, dynamic interest rates based on market conditions.

Security features: Extensive security audits (Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin), economic risk analysis by Gauntlet, transparent and verifiable contracts.

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Decentralized governance with COMP tokens, financial inclusion without traditional verifications, continuous platform innovation and updates.

11. Lido

Best DeFi protocol for ETH staking

Token

LDO

Token max supply

1,000,000,000 LDO

Market cap

$2.215B

TVL

$34.445B

Lido Finance is a DeFi staking protocol offering user-friendly, semi-custodial staking services across multiple cryptocurrencies. Known for its simple interface and decentralized structure, Lido allows users to stake their assets and receive liquid staking tokens, such as stETH, which can be utilized in the broader DeFi ecosystem for yield farming.

Supported by major players in DeFi and endorsed for its reasonable fees and rewarding referral program, Lido maximizes decentralization through its governance token, LDO, allowing stakeholders to partake in decision-making. While Lido streamlines the staking process, users should consider the semi-custodial nature, the staking rewards fees, and potential tax implications associated with rewards.

Pros

User-friendly interface Liquid staking tokens Decentralized governance Supported by DeFi leaders Cons

Semi-custodial service Staking rewards fees Potential tax implications Staking features: Easy and unrestricted staking, maximized earning potential, liquid staking tokens for yield farming.

Earning features: Daily staking rewards, assets used as collateral for lending and yield farming, participation in governance for reward optimization.

Security features: Smart contracts audited by Quantstamp and Sigma Prime, semi-custodial nature maintains user control.

DeFi and ecosystem engagement: Governance via LDO tokens, broad DeFi integration, supports multiple blockchains including Ethereum.

DeFi protocols comparedProtocolTypeTVLTokenNo. of blockchains supportedPancakeSwapDEX$2.224BCAKE9UniswapDEX$5.543BUNI8CurveDEX$2.486BCRV14BalancerDEX$1.242BBAL8Summer.fiDEX$5.345bsummer.fi4AaveLending$10.564BAAVE12MakerDAOLending$7BMKR1CompoundLending$2.668BCOMP4dYdXDEX$401.81MdYdX1LidoStaking$34.445BLDO5De.FiTracker and walletn/aDEFI15What are DeFi protocols?DeFi protocols are sets of rules, procedures, and codes that govern decentralized finance (DeFi) systems, enabling users to engage in activities such as trading, lending, and staking tokens within blockchain ecosystems. 

DeFi represents a paradigm shift leveraging blockchain technology, primarily Ethereum, to cultivate an open, permissionless, and borderless financial ecosystem. Unlike traditional systems, developers write smart contracts to deploy DeFi protocols that enable peer-to-peer interactions without intermediaries. By adhering to the same set of rules, DeFi protocols ensure a standardized experience for all participants. 

An example of a DeFi protocol is MakerDAO. The popular DeFi lending platform allows users to borrow against their crypto assets by locking them in exchange for a stablecoin, DAI, thus offering more predictable repayment terms despite the volatility of crypto markets. 

Other protocols allow you to earn a passive income by generating yield from your staked assets. One popular example is the Lido protocol, which allows you to earn on stETH.  Platforms like Lido aim to offer the highest APY on crypto staking, allowing users to maximize returns on their staked assets within the Ethereum ecosystem.

The total value locked (TVL) is often used as a metric to gauge a protocol’s adoption and utility, with MakerDAO being one of the largest by TVL, highlighting its significant role in DeFi.

In 2026, new and more efficient technologies are being developed. For instance, some protocols incorporate asynchronous smart contracts, which allow transactions and agreements to be executed without needing all parties to be present or online simultaneously. This helps streamline operations within networks like Ethereum.

According to DeFiLlama, the top protocol categories are lending, DEXs, bridges, CDP (protocols that mint their own stablecoin using collateralized lending), and restaking. 

Protocol categories: DeFiLlamaWhy do you need DeFi protocols?DeFi allows decentralized apps (DApps) and platforms to provide services like crypto lending and crypto yield earning through staking. Users can participate in AMM (automated market maker) systems to improve liquidity. 

These features offer a fertile ground for startups to innovate beyond conventional financial products, fostering rapid experimentation and potential disruption. The global accessibility facilitated by DeFi platforms makes them a significant tool for financial inclusion, allowing startups to reach a worldwide audience. 

The interoperability among various DeFi protocols enhances this further, enabling seamless integration of services like web3 gaming and metaverse tokens, broadening the scope of what blockchain startups can achieve.

The total value locked (TVL) in DeFi platforms serves as a metric of trust and utility, indicating the number of cryptocurrencies staked, lent, or committed to liquidity pools, highlighting the ecosystem’s growth and stability.

By eliminating intermediaries, DeFi significantly lowers transaction costs, making it an attractive model for startups, especially in crypto lending and yield generation. Instead of being worried about your credit score, you can apply for a crypto loan with fewer restrictions than in TradFi. This reduction in costs, combined with the potential for high crypto yield through mechanisms like staking, positions DeFi as an increasingly popular option for both entrepreneurs and investors in the crypto market.

How do DeFi protocols work?DeFi protocols function by leveraging blockchain technology. While most of them are based on Ethereum, some may also support other networks. At the heart of these services are smart contracts, self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code, which facilitate, verify, and enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract.

DeFi, however, requires thorough research and understanding of several factors, including security, liquidity, and the platform’s governance structure. It’s important to assess the user experience, the degree of interoperability with other DApps and blockchain systems, and the level of community involvement in decision-making processes.

1. Decentralized apps (DApps)Users can engage with various DeFi platforms or DApps to access a wide range of financial services. 

One common way to participate is through crypto lending on platforms. Protocols such as Aave or Compound allow you to deposit cryptocurrencies to earn interest. The earnings are measured as Annual Percentage Yield (APY), which is a volatile percentage that corresponds to the market’s demands.

2. Liquidity miningAnother popular DeFi activity is liquidity mining. You can provide liquidity to decentralized exchanges (DEXs) by depositing your assets into liquidity pools. This deposit is usually made for a pair of assets, such as ETH-USDT, but it can be anything else.

In return, you earn rewards, often in the platform’s native tokens. This process is critical for ensuring there is enough market liquidity for trading and is facilitated by AMMs, algorithms used by DEXs to determine the price of tokens and facilitate trades.

3. Swaps (trading)Trading on DEXs is another key function of DeFi protocols. These platforms allow users to trade cryptocurrencies directly with others in a more private and accessible manner than on centralized exchanges. 

This not only supports the decentralized ethos of blockchain but also contributes to the Total Value Locked (TVL).

Should you use DeFi protocols?Pros  Earn money: You can make your crypto work for you. Put your assets in DeFi platforms to earn interest or rewards. Trade easily: Swap cryptocurrencies directly with others. No need for a middleman. More control: You’re in charge of your money. No bank or institution can block your transactions. Open to everyone: Anyone with an internet connection can join. It’s global and inclusive. Transparent: Everything is recorded on the blockchain. You can see all transactions. New opportunities: Explore new financial services like crypto lending or web3 gaming. Cons  Risky: Crypto values can change fast. Your investments can shrink quickly. Complicated: Some DeFi stuff is hard to understand. It’s not always beginner-friendly. Security issues: Hacks happen. If a DeFi platform gets attacked, you might lose your money. No customer support: If you have a problem, there’s no customer service to call. Research needed: You need to do your homework before investing. Not all platforms are safe. High fees: Sometimes, you’ll pay a lot to make transactions, especially when the network is busy. Could DeFi replace traditional finance?Decentralized finance has the potential to usurp traditional institutions, specifically TradFi. Decentralized finance enables users to transact securely, anonymously, and efficiently and is thus likely to gain popularity as web3 and crypto adoption grows. From crypto lending to staking to market makers, DeFi is exciting but also risky.

Do not interact with any DeFi protocols until you have developed a solid plan and are entirely comfortable with the mechanisms of the platform. Always be aware of the potential for losses, and never invest more than you can afford to lose.

Frequently asked questions What is the most popular DeFi protocol? The most popular DeFi protocol is often considered to be MakerDAO. It frequently leads in terms of Total Value Locked (TVL) and has a wide usage across the DeFi ecosystem. MakerDAO’s platform revolves around the generation of DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, and enables decentralized borrowing and saving. Its popularity stems from its innovative approach to maintaining currency stability and providing a decentralized credit service.

What are the top five DeFi tokens? The top five DeFi tokens typically include Maker (MKR), Aave (AAVE), Compound (COMP), Uniswap (UNI), and PancakeSwap (CAKE), based on their market capitalization and impact on the DeFi space. These tokens facilitate governance of their respective platforms, offering holders voting rights on decisions and upgrades. They are integral to the operations of these platforms, from lending and borrowing to providing liquidity and facilitating decentralized trading.

What is TVL in DeFi protocols? Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols refers to the total amount of assets currently being staked, lent, or deposited within a DeFi protocol’s smart contracts. It serves as a metric to gauge the overall health and growth of the DeFi market, indicating how much money is actively used in these decentralized financial services. A higher TVL suggests greater user trust and utility of the DeFi ecosystem.

How many DeFi protocols are there? The number of DeFi protocols is constantly growing as the space evolves and new projects are launched. There are hundreds of DeFi protocols across various blockchains, catering to different aspects of decentralized finance such as lending, borrowing, trading, and liquidity provision. The exact number can vary daily due to the dynamic nature of the crypto and DeFi industries.

How many DeFi protocols are there? The number of DeFi protocols is constantly growing as the space evolves and new projects are launched. There are hundreds of DeFi protocols across various blockchains, catering to different aspects of decentralized finance such as lending, borrowing, trading, and liquidity provision. The exact number can vary daily due to the dynamic nature of the crypto and DeFi industries.

Is TVL a good metric? TVL is a good metric for understanding the scale and usage of a DeFi protocol, as it reflects the total capital committed by users. However, it should not be the sole metric for assessing a protocol’s value or success, as it does not account for risks, decentralization level, or liquidity. It’s best used in combination with other factors like user growth, transaction volume, and protocol governance for a comprehensive evaluation.

What is a good FDV TVL ratio? A good FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) to TVL (Total Value Locked) ratio for a DeFi project is typically below one, indicating that the project’s market valuation is not excessively higher than the value of assets locked in the protocol. Lower FDV/TVL ratios suggest that the protocol is undervalued or efficiently using its capital, which can be attractive to investors. However, this ratio should be considered alongside other metrics and project fundamentals for a complete analysis.

What is the TVL formula? The TVL formula in DeFi protocols calculates the total value of all assets deposited in the protocol’s smart contracts, which can include cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other tokens. It aggregates the value of these assets, often converting them to a common currency like USD for a standardized measure. The formula is the sum of the value of each type of asset multiplied by its current market price.

How to calculate FDV? The Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) is calculated by taking the total supply of a token (both circulating and non-circulating) and multiplying it by the current price of the token. This gives an idea of what the market cap would be if all tokens were in circulation and trading at the current price. It’s an important metric for understanding the potential market size and investment risk of a cryptocurrency or DeFi project.

June 18: Slowmist founder Wan Yee announced on social media that Aztec’s Private Rollup Bridge has suffered a suspected security breach, with three suspicious fund transfers siphoning approximately $2.15 million in total assets. Initial investigations show the stolen funds—including ETH, DAI, renBTC, and other custodial holdings—were moved to addresses controlled by the attacker.

Relevant content

Preview: The U.S. May core PCE data will be released at 20:30 tonight, and is projected to hit its highest level since October 2023.

The Fed’s key inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, will be released at 20:30 tonight, with markets expecting a sharp rise in May inflation that could reignite rate hike bets. The headline PCE year-over-year growth rate is projected to hit 4.1% in May, up from 3.8% in April and marking its highest level since 2023. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, is forecast to rise to 3.4% year-over-year, up from 3.3% in April and its highest reading since October 2023. Core PCE has remained above the Fed’s 2% inflation target since 2021. The recent short-term inflation uptick was driven mainly by surging gasoline prices amid the Iran conflict in May. Oil prices have since edged lower following the signing of a peace deal between the U.S. and Iran, but core inflation has strengthened in tandem, indicating that price pressures are not solely tied to geopolitical oil shocks. Data from the CME FedWatch Tool shows that as of Wednesday, markets are pricing in a 34% probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in July. Aditya Bhave, U.S. economist at Bank of America Securities, noted that the recent inflation rebound stems in part from tariffs and one-off disruptions, but successive supply shocks have eroded the Fed’s patience, while deflationary room in the housing sector has largely been exhausted. Data shows that core PCE dipped to 2.6% in April, its lowest level since 2022, but annualized core PCE growth over the past three and six months has hovered near 3.8%.

4 minutes ago

SK Hynix plans to list on NASDAQ on July 10: A crypto whale opens 90% of its bullish positions in a single day, with all $21.27 million in long positions in unrealized profit.

According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, SK Hynix officially announced its U.S. listing date today, targeting a July 10 debut on the NASDAQ. The company had previously disclosed a over $29 billion listing fundraising plan yesterday afternoon. Driven by listing optimism, SKHX surged 14% intraday, hitting $1930 at press time, with a daily trading volume of $407 million and open interest of $237 million. Since the news broke yesterday, 10 whales have built positions in SKHX on Hyperliquid, 9 of which opened long positions totaling around $21.27 million, at an average entry price of ~$1797.8 and average unweighted liquidation price of ~$1390.6. With price gains, all 9 long positions are now in unrealized profit. Market data shows that positions of over $1 million amount to roughly $140 million, with a long-short ratio (longs/shorts) of ~0.715. The average entry price for longs is ~$1672, while shorts average ~$1640. The nearest short liquidation threshold stands at $2149, just $200 away from the current price, mounting short-side pressure. -HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group, set it as admin (enable message sending permission) to auto-sync on-chain updates.

4 minutes ago

The "Retail vs. Wall Street" concept-linked token WEN continues its strong run, rising over 18% in after-hours trading.

According to Bitget market data, Wendy's (WEN) rallied 25.66% in the regular trading session, then climbed an extra 18.96% in after-hours trading, now changing hands at $9.35. Earlier reports noted that Serenity took to Twitter to mock the latest meme stock movement unfolding on Reddit's high-risk trading communities, targeting U.S. fast-food chain Wendy's. The Reddit community's meme warning reads: "If Wendy's goes bankrupt, we'll all be out of jobs, and after losing all our trading money, we'll have to work behind Wendy's trash cans." Serenity later clarified that they hold no positions, only found the activity amusing, and added they were unsure if the campaign would succeed. Wendy's holds a special cultural status on Reddit's WallStreetBets community; for years, "working behind Wendy's trash cans" has been a staple joke among retail investors mocking their trading losses.

4 minutes ago

Danske Bank: Federal Reserve may raise interest rates at least twice

Danske Bank senior analyst Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen and chief analyst Jens Peter Sorensen stated in a report that they expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise interest rates twice, in December 2026 and March 2027 respectively, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00%-4.25%. "However, we emphasize there is a risk that rate hikes could come earlier and that the number of hikes may exceed two," they said. The first Federal Reserve meeting led by Kevin Warsh sent a clear signal that the Fed is increasingly moving away from forward guidance surrounding future monetary policy decisions. "All signs indicate that (the Fed) is leaning toward having greater discretion in future policy decisions," the Danske Bank analysts added. Source: Jin10

4 minutes ago

SK Hynix's stock price rise widened to 15.4%, while Samsung Electronics gained 6.3%.

According to Bitget data, SK Hynix’s stock price gain has widened to 15.4%, with Samsung Electronics up 6.3%.

4 minutes ago

The entire cryptocurrency market is down across the board; funding rates indicate BTC remains in bearish territory, while ETH’s bullish sentiment is significantly stronger than BTC’s.

According to HTX market data, Bitcoin is currently trading at $61,684.51, down 1.88% in the past 24 hours; Ethereum is at $1,647.36, down 1.48% over the same period. Current funding rates on major centralized exchanges (CEXs) show a clear divergence between BTC and ETH: BTC rates across all platforms have fallen back into bearish territory, while ETH rates on most platforms remain above the neutral range, indicating significantly stronger bullish sentiment for ETH than BTC. BlockBeats Note: Funding rates are fees set by cryptocurrency trading platforms to maintain the balance between contract prices and underlying asset prices, typically applicable to perpetual contracts. They serve as a fund exchange mechanism between long and short traders; platforms do not collect these fees, instead using them to adjust the cost or return of traders holding contracts, so that contract prices stay close to the underlying asset prices. A funding rate of 0.01% is the benchmark. A rate above 0.01% indicates broad bullish market sentiment, while a rate below 0.005% signals widespread bearish sentiment.

4 minutes ago

COINTURK NEWSBitcoin, Blockchain and Cryptocurrency News and Analysis

Crypto Tracker AppBitcoinAltcoinEthereumAdvertiseContactTURES Search

© 2024 COINTURK NEWS. All Rights Reserved.

Search

Crypto Tracker AppBitcoinAltcoinEthereumAdvertiseContactTURESFollow US

© 2025 >> COINTURK NEWS
Powered by LK SOFTWARE

Avalanche (AVAX)

Avalanche trades at $6.07 after falling over 6% as Summit event moves to New York in September İlayda Peker 2 minutes ago

Cryptocurrency News

ESMA ordered all unlicensed crypto firms in the EU to halt operations by July 1 under MiCA rules Onur Atam 4 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

BlackRock link transfer worth 168.6 million dollars rocks the market! What are investors watching next? Levent Kurt 6 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin fell to a 21 month low, major altcoins and crypto stocks extended losses İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Stellar (XLM)

XLM backed by $3.35 billion surge in real world assets! What is driving investor interest? İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Latest Posts

Tron (TRX)

TRX holds above key $0.304 support despite recent market weakness İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Hedera (HBAR)

HBAR drops 4.82 percent in 24 hours! What does this signal for investors? Onur Atam 8 hours ago

Cryptocurrency News

Ric Edelman said crypto adoption is accelerating among institutions as individual investor activity slows İlayda Peker 8 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin trades at $62,819 as analysts highlight $60,000 to $61,000 support Levent Kurt 10 hours ago

Solana (SOL)

Solana projected to reach $71.20 by June 2026 despite weak short term signals Levent Kurt 10 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin fell 3% in 24 hours to below $61,000, with $1.2 billion in short positions accumulating near $63,500 İlayda Peker 11 hours ago

EthereumView All

Ethereum (ETH)

Ethereum trades below $1,740 support, analysts warn risk of further decline to $1,460🚨 Ethereum trades below $1,740 support, raising the risk of a further…

İlayda Peker 17 hours ago

Ethereum Foundation slashes annual budget by 40 percent! What does this mean for $ETH investors? 1 day ago

Ethereum Foundation laid off 54 employees, cutting about 20% of its workforce as part of restructuring 1 day ago

Ethlabs launched as independent research group to advance Ethereum’s core technology 2 days ago

Ethereum tests the $1,736 support zone again! What are analysts watching now? 2 days ago

EconomyView All

Bank of America raised its forecast to three Fed rate hikes totaling 75 basis points by year end 19 hours ago

US Senate blocks the FED from launching a digital dollar until 2030! What are the details investors need to know? 2 days ago

Bitmine now holds 4.7 percent of Ethereum’s supply! What does this mean for $ETH investors? 3 days ago

Altcoin NewsView All

Altcoin NewsChainlink (LINK)

Bitcoin dips below $80,400 as altcoins feel the pressure🟢 Bitcoin dropped below $80,400 amid negative news. Markets are watching $76,000…

İlayda Peker 1 month ago

Exploring the Latest Trends in Cryptocurrency Prices 2 years ago

Crypto Markets Surge as Historical Patterns Resurface 12 months ago

Discover How COW Coin’s New Model Sparks Price Surge 1 year ago

What is Polkadot Coin? 3 years ago

Market State by Cryptorank

Technical Analysis

Old bitcoin wallet moves 500 BTC as price drops 3 percent 1 month ago

BTC surges above $81,000 as accumulation signals emerge 2 months ago

Follow US

8k Like

20k Follow

1.1k Follow

Sponsored Content

Institutional Capital Shifts Toward AI-Powered Blockchain Infrastructure as SHRMiner Expands Intelligent Platform 1 month ago

As AI Infrastructure Demand Rises, SHR Miner Expands Focus on Energy Stability and Sustainable Computing Operations 1 month ago

Macro Trends in Digital Asset Velocity: The Shift from Speculation to Utility 5 months ago

COINTURK NEWSBitcoin, Blockchain and Cryptocurrency News and Analysis

Crypto Tracker AppBitcoinAltcoinEthereumAdvertiseContactTURES Search

© 2024 COINTURK NEWS. All Rights Reserved.

Search

Crypto Tracker AppBitcoinAltcoinEthereumAdvertiseContactTURESFollow US

© 2025 >> COINTURK NEWS
Powered by LK SOFTWARE

Avalanche (AVAX)

Avalanche trades at $6.07 after falling over 6% as Summit event moves to New York in September İlayda Peker 2 minutes ago

Cryptocurrency News

ESMA ordered all unlicensed crypto firms in the EU to halt operations by July 1 under MiCA rules Onur Atam 4 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

BlackRock link transfer worth 168.6 million dollars rocks the market! What are investors watching next? Levent Kurt 6 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin fell to a 21 month low, major altcoins and crypto stocks extended losses İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Stellar (XLM)

XLM backed by $3.35 billion surge in real world assets! What is driving investor interest? İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Latest Posts

Tron (TRX)

TRX holds above key $0.304 support despite recent market weakness İlayda Peker 7 hours ago

Hedera (HBAR)

HBAR drops 4.82 percent in 24 hours! What does this signal for investors? Onur Atam 8 hours ago

Cryptocurrency News

Ric Edelman said crypto adoption is accelerating among institutions as individual investor activity slows İlayda Peker 8 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin trades at $62,819 as analysts highlight $60,000 to $61,000 support Levent Kurt 10 hours ago

Solana (SOL)

Solana projected to reach $71.20 by June 2026 despite weak short term signals Levent Kurt 10 hours ago

Bitcoin (BTC)

Bitcoin fell 3% in 24 hours to below $61,000, with $1.2 billion in short positions accumulating near $63,500 İlayda Peker 11 hours ago

EthereumView All

Ethereum (ETH)

Ethereum trades below $1,740 support, analysts warn risk of further decline to $1,460🚨 Ethereum trades below $1,740 support, raising the risk of a further…

İlayda Peker 17 hours ago

Ethereum Foundation slashes annual budget by 40 percent! What does this mean for $ETH investors? 1 day ago

Ethereum Foundation laid off 54 employees, cutting about 20% of its workforce as part of restructuring 1 day ago

Ethlabs launched as independent research group to advance Ethereum’s core technology 2 days ago

Ethereum tests the $1,736 support zone again! What are analysts watching now? 2 days ago

EconomyView All

Bank of America raised its forecast to three Fed rate hikes totaling 75 basis points by year end 19 hours ago

US Senate blocks the FED from launching a digital dollar until 2030! What are the details investors need to know? 2 days ago

Bitmine now holds 4.7 percent of Ethereum’s supply! What does this mean for $ETH investors? 3 days ago

Altcoin NewsView All

Altcoin NewsChainlink (LINK)

Bitcoin dips below $80,400 as altcoins feel the pressure🟢 Bitcoin dropped below $80,400 amid negative news. Markets are watching $76,000…

İlayda Peker 1 month ago

Exploring the Latest Trends in Cryptocurrency Prices 2 years ago

Crypto Markets Surge as Historical Patterns Resurface 12 months ago

Discover How COW Coin’s New Model Sparks Price Surge 1 year ago

What is Polkadot Coin? 3 years ago

Market State by Cryptorank

Technical Analysis

Old bitcoin wallet moves 500 BTC as price drops 3 percent 1 month ago

BTC surges above $81,000 as accumulation signals emerge 2 months ago

Follow US

8k Like

20k Follow

1.1k Follow

Sponsored Content

Institutional Capital Shifts Toward AI-Powered Blockchain Infrastructure as SHRMiner Expands Intelligent Platform 1 month ago

As AI Infrastructure Demand Rises, SHR Miner Expands Focus on Energy Stability and Sustainable Computing Operations 1 month ago

Macro Trends in Digital Asset Velocity: The Shift from Speculation to Utility 5 months ago

ONDO Flat on MetaMask Tokenized Securities Integration Following 37% Monthly Drop

Maple Finance announced on February 9 that its web app had a security vulnerability. The issue has been fixed, but as a precaution, the team will temporarily take the web app offline to ensure the fix is fully rolled out. The team confirmed that smart contracts remain unaffected and user deposits are secure. Users will be notified once the web app is back online.

Relevant content

Preview: The U.S. May core PCE data will be released at 20:30 tonight, and is projected to hit its highest level since October 2023.

The Fed’s key inflation gauge, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, will be released at 20:30 tonight, with markets expecting a sharp rise in May inflation that could reignite rate hike bets. The headline PCE year-over-year growth rate is projected to hit 4.1% in May, up from 3.8% in April and marking its highest level since 2023. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, is forecast to rise to 3.4% year-over-year, up from 3.3% in April and its highest reading since October 2023. Core PCE has remained above the Fed’s 2% inflation target since 2021. The recent short-term inflation uptick was driven mainly by surging gasoline prices amid the Iran conflict in May. Oil prices have since edged lower following the signing of a peace deal between the U.S. and Iran, but core inflation has strengthened in tandem, indicating that price pressures are not solely tied to geopolitical oil shocks. Data from the CME FedWatch Tool shows that as of Wednesday, markets are pricing in a 34% probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in July. Aditya Bhave, U.S. economist at Bank of America Securities, noted that the recent inflation rebound stems in part from tariffs and one-off disruptions, but successive supply shocks have eroded the Fed’s patience, while deflationary room in the housing sector has largely been exhausted. Data shows that core PCE dipped to 2.6% in April, its lowest level since 2022, but annualized core PCE growth over the past three and six months has hovered near 3.8%.

3 minutes ago

SK Hynix plans to list on NASDAQ on July 10: A crypto whale opens 90% of its bullish positions in a single day, with all $21.27 million in long positions in unrealized profit.

According to Hyperinsight’s monitoring, SK Hynix officially announced its U.S. listing date today, targeting a July 10 debut on the NASDAQ. The company had previously disclosed a over $29 billion listing fundraising plan yesterday afternoon. Driven by listing optimism, SKHX surged 14% intraday, hitting $1930 at press time, with a daily trading volume of $407 million and open interest of $237 million. Since the news broke yesterday, 10 whales have built positions in SKHX on Hyperliquid, 9 of which opened long positions totaling around $21.27 million, at an average entry price of ~$1797.8 and average unweighted liquidation price of ~$1390.6. With price gains, all 9 long positions are now in unrealized profit. Market data shows that positions of over $1 million amount to roughly $140 million, with a long-short ratio (longs/shorts) of ~0.715. The average entry price for longs is ~$1672, while shorts average ~$1640. The nearest short liquidation threshold stands at $2149, just $200 away from the current price, mounting short-side pressure. -HyperInsight Bot is now live. Add @HyperInsightBot to your Telegram group, set it as admin (enable message sending permission) to auto-sync on-chain updates.

3 minutes ago

The "Retail vs. Wall Street" concept-linked token WEN continues its strong run, rising over 18% in after-hours trading.

According to Bitget market data, Wendy's (WEN) rallied 25.66% in the regular trading session, then climbed an extra 18.96% in after-hours trading, now changing hands at $9.35. Earlier reports noted that Serenity took to Twitter to mock the latest meme stock movement unfolding on Reddit's high-risk trading communities, targeting U.S. fast-food chain Wendy's. The Reddit community's meme warning reads: "If Wendy's goes bankrupt, we'll all be out of jobs, and after losing all our trading money, we'll have to work behind Wendy's trash cans." Serenity later clarified that they hold no positions, only found the activity amusing, and added they were unsure if the campaign would succeed. Wendy's holds a special cultural status on Reddit's WallStreetBets community; for years, "working behind Wendy's trash cans" has been a staple joke among retail investors mocking their trading losses.

3 minutes ago

Danske Bank: Federal Reserve may raise interest rates at least twice

Danske Bank senior analyst Kirstine Kundby-Nielsen and chief analyst Jens Peter Sorensen stated in a report that they expect the U.S. Federal Reserve to raise interest rates twice, in December 2026 and March 2027 respectively, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.00%-4.25%. "However, we emphasize there is a risk that rate hikes could come earlier and that the number of hikes may exceed two," they said. The first Federal Reserve meeting led by Kevin Warsh sent a clear signal that the Fed is increasingly moving away from forward guidance surrounding future monetary policy decisions. "All signs indicate that (the Fed) is leaning toward having greater discretion in future policy decisions," the Danske Bank analysts added. Source: Jin10

3 minutes ago

SK Hynix's stock price rise widened to 15.4%, while Samsung Electronics gained 6.3%.

According to Bitget data, SK Hynix’s stock price gain has widened to 15.4%, with Samsung Electronics up 6.3%.

3 minutes ago

The entire cryptocurrency market is down across the board; funding rates indicate BTC remains in bearish territory, while ETH’s bullish sentiment is significantly stronger than BTC’s.

According to HTX market data, Bitcoin is currently trading at $61,684.51, down 1.88% in the past 24 hours; Ethereum is at $1,647.36, down 1.48% over the same period. Current funding rates on major centralized exchanges (CEXs) show a clear divergence between BTC and ETH: BTC rates across all platforms have fallen back into bearish territory, while ETH rates on most platforms remain above the neutral range, indicating significantly stronger bullish sentiment for ETH than BTC. BlockBeats Note: Funding rates are fees set by cryptocurrency trading platforms to maintain the balance between contract prices and underlying asset prices, typically applicable to perpetual contracts. They serve as a fund exchange mechanism between long and short traders; platforms do not collect these fees, instead using them to adjust the cost or return of traders holding contracts, so that contract prices stay close to the underlying asset prices. A funding rate of 0.01% is the benchmark. A rate above 0.01% indicates broad bullish market sentiment, while a rate below 0.005% signals widespread bearish sentiment.

3 minutes ago

Maple Finance (SYRUP) is trading near $0.2700 at press time on Friday, with bulls keeping the price buoyant above the S1 Pivot Point support at $0.2497. The on-chain data indicate consistent user demand for the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocol, with its Assets Under Management (AUM) exceeding $4 billion and revenue remaining steady after reaching a monthly record high in January. The technical outlook for SYRUP indicates a rebound as selling pressure wanes.

Maple Finance retains revenue, whale interestDune dashboard data indicate that Maple Finance recorded revenue of $1.46 million so far this month, after reaching a record high of $2.57 million in revenue, primarily from lending fees and yield optimization. This reflects a steady increase in monthly revenues, building on the $2.49 million collected in December. 

Maple Finance monthly revenue. Source: DuneAdditionally, the protocol's AUM has exceeded $4 billion, while outstanding loan balances account for $1.08 billion. The steady revenue and rising AUM suggest that Maple Finance's ecosystem continues to expand amid increasing market demand.

Maple Finance AUM data. Source: DuneCorroborating the high demand, CryptoQuant data shows consistent interest from large wallet investors, commonly known as whales, based on the average SYRUP order size of executed spot-market trades. 

SYRUP spot market indicators. Source: CryptoQuantTechnical outlook: Will SYRUP rebound within the falling channel?Maple Finance is above the S1 pivot point at $0.2497, serving as short-term support following a broader decline over the last 31 days, which has resulted in roughly a 35% loss. This decline reflects a downward trend within a larger descending channel pattern formed by two parallel lines on the daily chart. 

A potential rebound in SYRUP could test the 50-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) at $0.3176, followed by the 200-day EMA at $0.3666 near the overhead resistance line.

The technical indicators on the daily chart suggest that selling pressure is waning. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is at 36, hovering above the oversold zone and taking a lateral shift after the prevailing decline. Additionally, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) approaches the signal line as the histogram's negative component contracts, indicating a potential crossover that would confirm a return to bullish momentum. 

SYRUP/USDT daily price chart.However, if SYRUP closes below the $0.2497, it could extend the decline to the S2 pivot point at $0.1937. 

TLDR: Yield-bearing stablecoins now combine Treasuries, lending markets, and AI compute revenue models across DeFi platforms. $sUSDS leads the sector with $5.3B TVL and roughly 4% APY from lending and real-world asset strategies. Maple’s $syrupUSDC generates about 4.7% APY through institutional lending to crypto-native borrowers. Gold-backed $pmUSD reportedly delivers the highest yields, ranging between 9% and 22% via Curve liquidity pools. Yield-bearing stablecoins are gaining traction as decentralized finance platforms compete to offer on-chain income products. 

Several tokens now promise steady returns backed by different asset structures. Some rely on U.S. Treasuries, while others draw yield from institutional lending or AI infrastructure. 

The expanding category shows how stablecoin design continues to evolve across the crypto market.

Yield-Bearing Stablecoins Introduce New DeFi Yield Models The DeFi ecosystem now features several yield-bearing stablecoins with distinct backing structures. Each product relies on a separate revenue engine to generate returns.

$sUSDS currently offers roughly 4% 30-day APY and holds about $5.3 billion in total value locked. The token relies on crypto collateral and real-world assets such as treasuries.

Protocol revenue from lending and real-world asset strategies funds the yield. The structure blends traditional finance exposure with on-chain lending activity.

$syrupUSDC provides around 4.7% 30-day APY and holds roughly $1.7 billion in locked capital. The yield comes from Maple’s institutional lending pools.

According to information shared on X by Edgy from The DeFi Edge, Maple deploys the capital to institutional borrowers. Interest payments generate the returns distributed to holders.

There are several yield-bearing stablecoins gaining real traction right now.

One's backed by treasuries.
One's backed by institutional credit.
One's backed by AI compute lending.

Here are six worth knowing right now, and what's actually backing the yield:

• $sUSDS: ~4% 30d… pic.twitter.com/4YnCeDpWsh

— Edgy – The DeFi Edge 🗡️ (@thedefiedge) March 7, 2026

Another model appears with $USYC. The token holds short-duration Treasuries and fixed-income instruments that drive gradual value appreciation.

Recent yields hover near 3%, while total value locked stands close to $1.9 billion. The structure allows yield to accumulate through price drift instead of explicit distributions.

Different Collateral Strategies Drive Stablecoin Yield Several newer tokens rely on alternative revenue streams beyond traditional lending. These structures attempt to capture emerging sectors within the crypto economy.

$USDai represents a synthetic dollar backed by Treasuries and AI compute lending infrastructure. Staking into $sUSDai exposes holders to those revenue flows.

Current yields approach 6.5%, while total value locked remains near $339 million. The token links stablecoin demand with AI compute financing markets.

$coreUSDC follows a vault strategy built around automated rebalancing. Deposited USDC moves between lending platforms including Euler and Morpho.

The system adjusts allocations across protocols to capture available lending yields. Current returns average about 6.3%, according to figures shared by The DeFi Edge.

Another model appears with $pmUSD, a stablecoin minted against tokenized gold collateral. Liquidity from the token primarily flows into Curve-based strategies.

Liquidity provider strategies reportedly produce yields ranging between 9% and 22%. These returns depend on liquidity incentives and market conditions within Curve pools.

The expanding list reflects growing experimentation across the stablecoin sector. Developers now test different combinations of real-world assets, DeFi lending, and infrastructure financing.

Nick Sawinyh on 16 Mar 2026

Yearn Finance launched yvUSD on January 19, 2026. It’s a V3 cross-chain, cross-asset stablecoin vault, not a simple USDC-only vault, with zero management fees, zero performance fees, and two deposit modes. At the time of writing it runs nine active yield strategies, though that number is dynamic and managed by the vault operator. If you’ve been watching the stablecoin yield space this year, those numbers alone probably caught your attention. Zero fees on a yield aggregator is unusual. Strategies spanning lending, fixed income, and points farming is ambitious. And the two-mode system (unlocked vs. locked) is a design choice I haven’t seen done quite this cleanly before.

This article breaks down how the vault actually works, where the yield comes from, what the risks look like in practice, and how it stacks up against the alternatives. I’ve tried to write the kind of analysis I’d want to read before putting real money into this thing.

What yvUSD is, mechanically At the contract level, yvUSD is a Yearn V3 Allocator Vault. That means it’s an ERC-4626 compliant smart contract that accepts USDC deposits on Ethereum mainnet, mints shares proportional to your deposit, and then deploys that capital across a portfolio of yield-generating strategies spanning multiple stablecoins and chains. Yearn’s own announcement describes it as “a cross-chain, cross-asset vault for best in class stablecoin yield.” The deposit token is USDC, but the vault’s strategies convert into sUSDS, siUSD, and other stablecoin derivatives as part of normal operation.

ERC-4626 matters here because it’s become the standard interface for tokenized vaults in DeFi. Any protocol that supports 4626 can plug into yvUSD without custom integration work. Your shares are yield-bearing ERC-20 tokens, which means they’re transferable, composable, and can be used as collateral elsewhere if a lending market accepts them.

The V3 architecture is a big upgrade from Yearn’s V2 system. In V2, strategies were locked to a single vault in a one-to-one relationship. In V3, strategies are themselves standalone ERC-4626 compliant contracts, Yearn calls them “Tokenized Strategies.” Per Yearn’s V3 docs: “strategies are now fully ERC-4626 compliant, stand-alone vaults” that “can now be connected to many different vaults simultaneously and can also be deposited into directly by an end user.” This is a meaningful architectural change: strategies can serve multiple allocator vaults, and users can deposit into individual strategies directly if they want to bypass the allocator entirely.

The practical implication: yvUSD’s current strategies are modular. They can be added, removed, or rebalanced without migrating the entire vault. The Debt Allocator contract handles capital distribution across strategies based on target allocations set by the vault manager, and an on-chain APR Oracle helps inform those allocation decisions.

Vault specs as of March 13, 2026:

Asset: USDC (Ethereum mainnet, cross-chain via Circle’s CCTP) TVL: $3.02M Fees: 0% management, 0% performance Risk score: 3/5 (Yearn’s self-assessment) Contract: 0x696d02Db93291651ED510704c9b286841d506987 (per the Yearn UI vault page; note that yvUSD may use multiple contracts across its allocator and strategy architecture, always verify the address you’re interacting with on yearn.fi directly) The unlocked/locked design This is the architectural decision that distinguishes yvUSD from a standard Yearn vault. When you deposit, you choose between two modes.

Unlocked gives you withdrawal access at any time, subject to the vault’s liquidity buffer. At the time of writing, the displayed estimated APY is around 7.14%, but this number is a trailing estimate that fluctuates based on strategy performance, incentive programs, and capital allocation. The Yearn UI may show substantially different numbers depending on the calculation window (7-day, 30-day, inception). Don’t treat any displayed APY as a fixed rate. The vault ensures it always has enough capital parked in short-duration, liquid strategies (sUSDS, basic Morpho lending) so that unlocked depositors can exit without delay.

Locked imposes a 14-day cooldown period after you signal your intent to withdraw, followed by a 5-day window during which you can actually pull your funds. In exchange, the vault can deploy your capital into longer-duration positions that pay more, things like Pendle principal tokens with fixed maturities, deeper leverage loops on Morpho, and cross-chain L2 plays.

The idea borrows from a concept that InfiniFi (one of the protocols integrated into the vault) has been developing: depositor-directed duration matching. Traditional banks take deposits and invest them into long-duration assets while hoping everyone doesn’t withdraw at once. yvUSD instead lets depositors explicitly reveal their liquidity preferences, then builds the portfolio accordingly. Locked capital funds the higher-yield, longer-duration strategies. Unlocked capital stays in liquid backstops. The vault knows exactly how much of its capital has a 14-day minimum lockup, which means it can allocate with more precision than a vault that has to assume 100% of deposits might leave tomorrow.

It’s a clean tradeoff, and worth thinking through carefully. If you’re not sure you’ll need the money in the next three weeks, locked mode is strictly better. If there’s any chance you’ll need fast access, stay unlocked and accept the lower rate.

Active strategies: where the yield comes from Everything is published on-chain, and the DeBank bundle shows live positions in real time. The vault currently runs nine strategies (this count is dynamic and managed by the vault operator). Here’s the approximate allocation as of March 13, 2026.

Morpho Yearn OG USDC Compounder (28% allocation, ~3.81% APY) This is the vault’s largest single position and its most conservative strategy. It deposits USDC into Morpho Blue’s isolated lending markets, specifically into markets curated by Yearn’s own risk team.

Morpho Blue, for those unfamiliar, is a permissionless lending primitive that launched as an evolution of Morpho’s original peer-to-peer optimization layer. Each Morpho Blue market is an isolated pair (one collateral asset, one loan asset) with immutable parameters. Risk doesn’t bleed between markets the way it can in pooled protocols like Aave. The tradeoff is that you need to pick your markets carefully, or delegate that decision to a curator.

The 3.81% APY comes from borrower interest. It’s real yield in the most traditional DeFi sense: someone is paying to borrow USDC, and you’re earning a share of that interest. Conservative, predictable, and the risk profile is well-understood after years of lending protocol history.

USD3 Pendle PT Maxi (20% allocation, ~7.99% APY) This is where the vault’s yield starts to get interesting. The strategy buys Pendle Principal Tokens (PTs) denominated in USD3 at a discount to face value and holds them to maturity.

A quick primer on how Pendle PTs work. Pendle splits a yield-bearing asset into two tokens: a Principal Token (PT) that’s redeemable 1:1 for the underlying at maturity, and a Yield Token (YT) that captures all the variable yield until that date. If you buy PT at a discount before maturity, you’ve effectively locked in a fixed yield, the spread between your purchase price and the redemption value.

So if PT-USD3 trades at $0.96 with a 6-month maturity, buying it and holding to expiration gives you roughly 8% annualized. No variable rate risk, no dependency on borrow demand staying high. The yield is encoded in the purchase price.

The risk here is duration. If the vault needs to exit this position before maturity, it has to sell the PT on the open market, potentially at a loss if rates have moved against it. This is one of the key reasons the locked/unlocked design exists. Locked capital can ride PTs to maturity. Unlocked capital stays out of these positions (or the vault maintains enough liquid buffer to cover unlocked withdrawals regardless).

Pendle has become a dominant venue for this kind of fixed-income DeFi. According to CoinMarketCap’s Pendle analysis, stablecoins now account for roughly 83% of Pendle’s TVL. The protocol also transitioned from vePENDLE to a liquid staking model (sPENDLE) on January 20, 2026, replacing multi-year lock-ups with a 14-day withdrawal period and directing up to 80% of protocol revenue to PENDLE buybacks for sPENDLE holders.

InfiniFi sIUSD Morpho Looper (19% allocation, 0% base APY) This is the most unusual position in the vault, and the one that confuses people when they look at the strategy list. It shows 0% APY. Why would the vault put 19% of its capital into something earning zero?

The answer is points farming.

InfiniFi is a DeFi protocol that replicates fractional reserve banking on-chain. Users deposit USDC, mint iUSD receipt tokens, then choose between liquid staking (siUSD) or locked positions (liUSD) with different yield profiles. Per DefiLlama, InfiniFi holds roughly $170M in TVL, and Messari reports $175M. The protocol is heading toward a token generation event (TGE) expected in early-to-mid 2026.

The vault deposits into InfiniFi, receives siUSD, then loops that position through Morpho to amplify its exposure. The 0% base APY is accurate in that no interest is being paid right now. But InfiniFi Points are accruing on the position, with enhanced multipliers for the strategies involved. Pendle’s siUSD pools are offering up to 4.5x point multipliers on YT positions.

When InfiniFi’s TGE happens, Yearn will monetize the accumulated points, likely through their signature permissionless Dutch auction system or OTC deals, and funnel the proceeds back into the vault. Your price-per-share goes up, and the retroactive APY on this strategy could end up being substantial. Or it could be modest. Nobody knows what InfiniFi tokens will be worth at launch.

This is the speculative component of the vault, and you should be clear-eyed about it. About 19% of the vault’s capital is sitting in a position that earns nothing today, betting on future token value. Yearn has historically been good at monetizing these positions (they’ve been doing it since the Curve wars era), but it’s still a bet, not a guaranteed yield stream.

USDC to sUSDS Depositor (10% allocation, ~3.82% APY) This strategy converts USDC to USDS, Sky Protocol’s stablecoin, and deposits it into the Sky Savings Rate module, receiving sUSDS in return. USDS is positioned as the successor to DAI within the Sky ecosystem (formerly MakerDAO), with a 1:1 upgrade path from DAI to USDS. Both tokens still exist; DAI has not been retired or renamed, but USDS is where Sky Protocol is directing new development and integrations.

The Sky Savings Rate is funded by Sky Protocol’s revenue, which comes from crypto collateralized loans, U.S. Treasury bill investments, and liquidity provisioning into SparkLend. As of March 2026, sUSDS yields around 4% APY. Sky Frontier Foundation’s own press release from March 6, 2026 describes sUSDS as having “+$10 Billion in supply,” making it the largest yield-generating stablecoin by market cap. (Note: this $10B figure refers to total sUSDS tokens in circulation, not to be confused with the larger DAI/USDS base stablecoin supply.)

For the vault, sUSDS serves a dual purpose. It generates reliable baseline yield (Sky Protocol’s revenue model is diversified and has operated for years under its prior MakerDAO branding), and it’s highly liquid with no withdrawal constraints. This is part of the vault’s liquidity buffer, the safe money that ensures unlocked depositors can always exit.

The risk here is mostly stablecoin peg risk: USDS could theoretically depeg from the dollar, or the conversion path USDC to USDS could involve slippage. In practice, USDS has maintained its peg reliably through years of market stress as DAI, and the conversion path is well-established.

syrupUSDC/USDC Morpho Looper (10% allocation, 0% base APY) Similar to the InfiniFi strategy, this position earns 0% in direct interest but farms points from Maple Finance’s syrupUSDC program. It’s a leveraged lending position on Morpho that amplifies exposure to Maple’s rewards program.

Maple has been rebuilding after its 2022 credit crisis, and syrupUSDC represents their new institutional lending product. The points here are a bet on Maple’s token economics and the value of being early to their relaunched ecosystem.

Same logic as the InfiniFi position: no yield today, speculative upside tomorrow. Same honest assessment: it could pay off well, or it could amount to very little.

PT siUSD March Morpho Looper (6% allocation, ~10.8% APY) This is the highest-APY strategy in the vault. It buys Pendle PT-siUSD tokens (which mature March 26, 2026) and leverages the position through Morpho to amplify the fixed yield.

The base PT yield is attractive on its own, around 9% fixed according to InfiniFi’s Pendle V2 pool data. The Morpho loop borrows against the PT position to buy more PTs, stacking the fixed yield. If the PT yield is 9% and you can borrow USDC at 4%, the spread gets amplified through leverage.

The risk here is compounded: you have PT duration risk, Morpho liquidation risk if collateral ratios move unfavorably, and the underlying InfiniFi counterparty risk, all stacked. At only 6% of the vault, this is sized as a satellite position rather than a core holding, which seems appropriate given the risk stack.

Smaller allocations (remaining ~7%) Three additional strategies round out the portfolio. The exact compositions shift as the vault rebalances, but they generally involve smaller Morpho lending positions and additional PT exposures across different maturities. They provide diversification within the strategy mix without materially changing the overall risk profile.

Where the APY numbers actually come from Here’s the honest version of what to expect.

Sustainable baseline (unlocked): roughly 6-8% APY, estimated. This range is derived from the combination of Morpho lending (~3.8%), Pendle PT strategies (~8-10%), and sUSDS (~3.8%), blended across the portfolio. Even if every points program goes to zero, this baseline should hold because it’s driven by real borrow demand, fixed-income instruments, and protocol revenue. It already beats Aave’s 3-5% and Morpho direct lending’s 4-8% after their respective fee structures. But this is an estimate based on current allocations. It is not a guaranteed rate, and it will shift as strategies are rebalanced and market conditions change.

Points premium: highly variable. The InfiniFi and syrupUSDC strategies (about 29% of the vault combined) are currently earning zero direct yield. Their eventual contribution depends entirely on token launch valuations and Yearn’s monetization execution. In a good scenario, this could add several percentage points to the annualized return. In a disappointing scenario, it might add very little.

The 54.4% 30-day APY on the vault page is misleading. It includes temporary launch incentives and early points monetization events that won’t recur. If you’re making a deposit decision based on that number, recalibrate. Plan around 6-8% and treat anything above that as a bonus.

How Yearn monetizes points (and why it matters that you don’t have to) This is one of the smartest parts of the design, and it’s worth understanding.

When you deposit into yvUSD, all points and reward tokens accrue to the vault’s contract address, not to your wallet. You never claim anything. You never pay gas to harvest. You never have to research which airdrop campaigns are running or track eligibility criteria.

When a points program converts to tokens (at TGE or during a liquidity event), Yearn’s system handles monetization. They typically use one of two mechanisms: OTC deals with market makers who want early token access, or their permissionless Dutch auction system where tokens are sold on-chain in a declining-price auction until clearing.

The proceeds flow back into the vault as additional USDC. Your share of that USDC shows up as an increase in the vault’s price-per-share (PPS). From your perspective, your yvUSD tokens are simply worth more when you redeem them.

The tradeoff is real, though. If InfiniFi’s token launches and immediately does a 50x, you don’t capture that upside, because Yearn sold the tokens at whatever price cleared the auction. You traded potential token moonshot exposure for guaranteed passivity. For most people holding stablecoins, that’s the right tradeoff. But if you’re the type who wants to hold and time individual airdrops, yvUSD isn’t designed for you.

Risk analysis Yearn rates yvUSD at 3/5 on their internal risk scale. That’s an honest number, not a conservative one. Here’s what’s driving it.

Smart contract risk: medium-high Multiple strategies (nine at the time of writing, subject to change) means a large set of smart contracts interacting with the vault. Each strategy interfaces with at least one external protocol (Morpho, Pendle, InfiniFi, Sky). The total smart contract surface area is large. Yearn’s V3 codebase has been audited and has processed hundreds of millions in TVL across other vaults, but the specific strategies in yvUSD are newer and less battle-tested.

A bug in any single strategy could result in losses to the portion of capital deployed there. Yearn’s architecture does provide some containment, since strategies can be revoked and capital recalled if issues are detected, but forced revocation during an exploit can still crystallize losses.

Leverage risk: present The Morpho looper strategies (InfiniFi looper, syrupUSDC looper, PT siUSD looper) use leverage. They borrow against their positions to amplify exposure. In normal markets, this amplifies yield. In stressed markets, it amplifies losses and can trigger liquidation.

Morpho’s isolated market design means a liquidation in one market doesn’t cascade into others, which is meaningfully better than pooled alternatives. But if a borrowed position hits its LLTV (Liquidation Loan-to-Value) threshold at oracle prices, the collateral gets sold. For looped positions, this can unwind rapidly.

Duration risk: present (especially in locked mode) Pendle PT strategies have fixed maturities. The USD3 Maxi position and the PT siUSD looper are both committed to specific expiry dates. If conditions change and the vault needs to exit early, it has to sell at market prices, which may be unfavorable.

The locked/unlocked design mitigates this significantly. Locked capital is deployed into duration-sensitive strategies with the explicit understanding that it won’t be withdrawn for at least 14 days. Unlocked capital avoids these positions. But if a large amount of unlocked capital tries to exit simultaneously and the liquid buffer is insufficient, there could be withdrawal delays.

Counterparty risk: moderate The vault depends on InfiniFi, Sky Protocol, Pendle, and Morpho functioning correctly. Each of these is a separate protocol with its own governance, codebase, and risk profile.

InfiniFi, in particular, is the youngest and least proven of the group. It has roughly $170M TVL per DefiLlama and a pre-TGE token, meaning its incentive structures are still evolving. Sky Protocol (the rebranded MakerDAO ecosystem) is at the opposite end of the spectrum, one of the most established DeFi protocols in existence.

Bridge risk: low Cross-chain activity uses Circle’s CCTP (Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol), which burns and mints native USDC rather than relying on wrapped tokens or bridges with independent validator sets. CCTP is widely regarded as the safest cross-chain mechanism for stablecoins, since it leverages Circle’s own attestation network. The risk isn’t zero (Circle is a centralized entity), but it’s meaningfully lower than most bridge alternatives.

Competitive landscape   Aave V3 Morpho direct yvUSD (unlocked) yvUSD (locked) Expected APY 3-5% 4-8% 6-8% sustainable Higher (not disclosed) Fees Variable Curator-dependent 0% / 0% 0% / 0% Withdrawal Instant Instant Instant (with buffer) 14-day cooldown Smart contract risk Very low Low-medium Medium-high Medium-high Leverage exposure None None Yes (partial) Yes (more) Effort required None Low None None Points/airdrop exposure None Possible (via curator) Yes (passive) Yes (passive) Aave remains the obvious choice if you want the simplest, most proven option. Five years of operation, enormous TVL, instant withdrawals. The yield reflects that safety, you’re paying for simplicity with lower returns. Currently around 3-5% on USDC after the protocol’s fee cut.

Morpho direct lending (via curated MetaMorpho vaults) gives you 4-8% with more granular risk selection. You choose which vault, which curator, which risk profile. The recent Telegram integration and institutional partnerships suggest Morpho’s distribution is expanding, which should sustain borrow demand. But you’re trusting a curator’s allocation decisions, and the newer isolated markets have a shorter track record.

yvUSD sits at the higher end of both yield and complexity. The 6-8% sustainable baseline comes from combining multiple yield sources that individually would be accessible but tedious to manage. The zero-fee structure means every basis point of yield goes to depositors, which is rare for an aggregator. Yearn’s V2 vaults charged 2% management and 20% performance fees. The V3 yvUSD vault charges nothing.

The competitive question is whether the additional 2-4% yield over Aave justifies the additional risk surface. For someone sitting on stablecoins they don’t need for three months, I think the answer is probably yes, especially in unlocked mode where you retain withdrawal flexibility. For someone who can’t tolerate any smart contract risk beyond the most battle-tested protocols, Aave is still the right call.

Projected returns on $100K Assuming daily compounding:

Timeframe Conservative 7% APY Boosted ~40% APY (temporary) 1 month ~$583 ~$3,300 3 months ~$1,750 ~$10,000 6 months ~$3,500 ~$20,000 12 months ~$7,000 N/A (won’t persist) The 7% column is your planning number. The boosted column is useful for understanding what the first few weeks or months might look like while incentive programs are active, but don’t build a financial plan around it.

Getting started Navigate to yearn.fi/v3/1/0x696d02Db93291651ED510704c9b286841d506987 Connect your wallet Choose unlocked or locked mode Deposit USDC and receive yvUSD shares There is no step 5. No claiming, no harvesting, no rebalancing. Your PPS increases as the vault accrues yield. To monitor positions: DeBank transparency bundle

What’s next: yvBTC Yearn has signaled that yvBTC is coming, following the same zero-fee, cross-chain, delta-neutral philosophy applied to Bitcoin. If yvUSD proves the model works for stablecoins, yvBTC would extend it to the most held crypto asset. Worth watching, though no timeline has been confirmed.

Where I land yvUSD is a well-designed product for a specific user: someone holding USDC who wants more than money-market rates, doesn’t want to actively manage positions across five different protocols, and is comfortable with a 3/5 risk profile in exchange for 6-8% passive yield.

The zero-fee structure is the detail that moves it from “interesting” to “worth seriously considering.” In most yield aggregators, fees eat 20% or more of your returns. Here, every basis point goes to depositors. That’s a meaningful edge over time.

The risk is real. Multiple strategies, leverage in the mix, points bets on pre-TGE tokens, duration exposure in Pendle PTs. None of this is Aave-simple, and the vault page doesn’t hide that (the 3/5 self-rating is refreshingly honest). But the risks are transparent, verifiable on-chain, and sized proportionally within the portfolio. The conservative core (Morpho lending + sUSDS) accounts for nearly 40% of the vault. The speculative tail (points farming) accounts for about 29%. The fixed-income middle (Pendle PTs) fills the rest.

If you’re comfortable with that structure, deposit what you can afford to have illiquid for a couple of weeks in the worst case. Start with unlocked mode if you’re cautious. And check the DeBank bundle periodically to verify the vault’s positions match what’s described here, because in DeFi, the ability to verify is the whole point.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct your own research and understand the risks before making any investment decisions.

0:00

TORONTO — The federal government is preparing to inject more money into Canada’s venture capital market than ever before, but investors say the success of its latest startup funding program will depend on whether private capital—particularly from the pension funds—can match the government’s pledge. 

In its 2025 budget, Ottawa committed $1 billion to the Venture and Growth Capital Catalyst Initiative (Growth VCCI), the successor to its flagship venture funding program. The government also earmarked $750 million for a separate pool meant to help startups scale after their early funding rounds. Together, the programs represent a major expansion of federal support for startups and scaleups at a moment when fundraising has become more difficult and exits remain scarce. 

Talking Points

Ottawa’s largest-ever venture capital program depends on greater participation from pension funds  The program is launching into a weaker fundraising market, where fewer new venture funds are being formed For investors, though, the scale of the government’s commitment is both welcome and daunting. 

“This will require deeper pockets,” said Senia Rapisarda, managing partner of HarbourVest, who oversees the Boston-based firm’s Canadian business. “We will need a lot of support.” 

The government’s latest VC commitment dwarfs its predecessor, the Venture Capitalist Catalyst Initiative, or VCCI. The program started as the Venture Capital Action Plan in 2013 with $390 million from the Conservative government. The Liberals continued the program under the VCCI moniker, contributing $371 million in 2017, and increased the pool to $450 million for the 2021 iteration. 

Typically, Ottawa distributes most of the money through VC fund managers that the government selects through an application process. The government has picked the same four funds—HarbourVest Canada, Teralys Capital, Kensington Capital Partners and Northleaf Capital Partners—since 2013. Those funds then have to raise capital from private investors, historically two to three dollars for every public dollar they receive. For Growth VCCI, Ottawa has proposed the funds raise three dollars for each dollar the government contributes.

The structure has worked for more than a decade, stretching public dollars further and helping build the funding network to grow Canadian startups. It hasn’t always been easy for the VCCI funds to raise enough private capital to match the government’s contribution, with several investors in the last iteration taking longer than expected to close their funds.

Since then, it’s only become more difficult to raise new venture funds. A recent report from RBCx, the tech and innovation banking arm of RBC, shows that Canadian venture funds raised about $2.1 billion in 2025, a 39-per-cent drop from the year before. “Private capital seems to be taking a step back for a variety of reasons,” said Patrick Lor, managing partner at Panache Ventures, pointing to higher interest rates and the lack of company exits, leaving less cash cycling through the VC market. “That’s what’s going to make it tough,” Lor said of raising the Growth VCCI funds. 

Canadian VC investors have long been pushing the country’s biggest pension funds to write more cheques to VC funds, without much response. Rapisarda said that while smaller, union pensions often contribute to funds like HarbourVest’s, they don’t have the financial heft of the Maple 8. Instead, much of the private capital backing earlier VCCI funds came from family offices, high-net-worth individuals and smaller institutional investors—sources that typically write smaller cheques that take longer to sign. 

Ottawa has been explicit about wanting the pensions to buy into Growth VCCI. The 2025 budget framed the new program as a way to “leverage more private capital by incentivizing pension funds and other institutional investor participation,” signalling that Canada’s largest pools of capital are expected to play a bigger role in financing the next generation of venture funds in the country.  

The government is still in the process of designing the program and hasn’t said how it plans to incentivize the pensions and larger institutional investors to participate this time around. None of the pension funds that make up the Maple 8 would say whether they plan to invest in the program, with some of them citing active consultations on the program. 

Some investors, however, say the environment may be shifting in Ottawa’s favour. Matt Cohen, managing partner at Ripple Ventures, a Toronto-based VC firm, said he is seeing more openness from pension funds and other large institutional investors than in previous cycles, driven in part by political pressure to invest domestically and a growing number of Canadian companies seeking capital.

“I’m feeling more optimistic around the conversations we’re having,” said Cohen, adding that institutional investors are “willing to listen more than ever” about venture opportunities and how they might participate.

Investors say a stronger buy-in from Canadian institutions is becoming more important as more startups in the country reach later stages of growth. Cohen said building a deeper pool of domestic capital could help keep Canadian companies in Canada as they scale, rather than relying on foreign investors for follow-on funding. 

Peter van der Velden, managing general partner at Toronto-based life sciences investment firm Lumira Ventures, said venture investors and the companies they back need clarity soon on what to expect from the government’s VC strategy. With the 2021 VCCI program, there was a three-year lag between announcing the money and the participating investors raising their funds. Van der Velden said the market can’t wait that long this time, warning that prolonging the program’s launch risks slowing deal making at a time when investors are already struggling to fundraise. “We’ve had very little fund formation, he said. “The capital is needed today.” 

PANews reported on March 26th that, according to CoinDesk, Obex, an incubator backed by Framework Ventures, has begun deploying $1 billion to link the Sky ecosystem's USDS stablecoin to yields from real-world assets such as AI data centers, energy, and housing, expanding stablecoin yield sources from crypto-native cycles to real-world assets. Initial partners include Maple, USD.ai, Daylight, Centrifuge, Securitize, River, TVL Capital, and Better. These institutions will bring real-world economic sectors such as lending, housing finance, energy, and AI infrastructure onto the blockchain through tokenization. It is understood that Obex received authorization last year to allocate up to $2.5 billion of Sky's USDS reserves to real-world assets to generate yields.

Key takeaways Maple operates as a hybrid model, integrating both CeFi and DeFi elements for lending. Institutional interest in crypto remains strong despite market volatility. Maple’s clients include prime brokers and asset managers, with loans ranging from $10 million to $500 million. DeFi composability is a key differentiator for Maple, driving growth. Syrup USDC and USDT holders benefit from over-collateralized loans to institutional borrowers. Partnerships, like the one with Athena, diversify asset backing and yield sources. Aave and Syrup collaborate to enhance user yield and utilization, not compete. Institutional trust in crypto is bolstered by the absence of recent fraud cases. More private credit players and investment banks are expected to enter bitcoin-backed lending. Users can leverage syrup USDC or USDT on Aave for higher yields. The hybrid CeFi/DeFi model of Maple appeals to a wide range of institutional clients. Institutional adoption of DeFi protocols is reshaping financial products and lending practices. Yield generation in Maple is driven by interest from over-collateralized loans. The DeFi ecosystem’s composability offers strategic advantages for lending platforms. Institutional resilience in crypto investment suggests a maturing market. Guest intro Paul Frambot is the co-founder and CEO of Morpho Labs, the research and development company building and growing the Morpho protocol. He co-founded Morpho Labs in 2021 while completing his Master’s in Parallel and Distributed Systems at the Institut Polytechnique de Paris, raising $18 million from investors including Andreessen Horowitz and Variant. Morpho has grown into a multi-billion-dollar DeFi lending protocol, with its latest version Morpho Blue serving as a secure and flexible base layer for onchain lending.

Maple’s hybrid lending model Maple integrates CeFi and DeFi lending practices, creating a unique hybrid model. We’re a little bit of a hybrid between CeFi lending which would use off-chain agreements and custodians and DeFi lending where you take in the capital on-chain and you record all of the loans on-chain

— Paul Frambot

This model allows for a seamless blend of traditional finance and blockchain technology. The hybrid approach is designed to cater to institutional clients with varying needs. Maple’s model records all loans on-chain, ensuring transparency and security. The integration of CeFi elements includes off-chain agreements and custodians. The DeFi aspect involves taking in capital and managing loans on-chain. Maple’s clients benefit from the security and efficiency of blockchain technology. The hybrid model is particularly appealing to prime brokers and asset managers. Loan sizes range from $10 million to $500 million, showcasing Maple’s capacity to handle large-scale lending. The loan sizes that we do are typically anywhere from the smallest loan we do would be about $10,000,000 and the largest we did was actually just before Christmas was a $500,000,000 one

— Paul Frambot

Institutional interest and resilience Institutional interest in crypto has remained stable despite market price fluctuations. I would say over periods of kind of price weakness for lack of a better word… the resilience of the institutional interest in crypto

— Paul Frambot

The absence of fraud cases has helped maintain institutional trust in the crypto space. What we’ve seen is that the key difference this time versus 2022 is that there is no case of fraud or there’s been nothing that’s really dented the trust of institutions in the space

— Paul Frambot

Institutional resilience suggests a maturing market for digital assets. The stability of institutional interest indicates confidence in the long-term potential of crypto. More private credit players and investment banks are expected to enter the bitcoin-backed lending space. I think it signifies that you should expect to see more private credit players or investment banks start to move into this space over time

— Paul Frambot

The institutional adoption of DeFi protocols is reshaping the landscape of financial products. Institutional players are increasingly recognizing the benefits of blockchain technology. The involvement of large financial institutions could drive further growth in the DeFi sector. Institutional interest is a key factor in the ongoing development of crypto markets. Yield generation and DeFi composability Maple’s yield comes from over-collateralized loans to institutional borrowers. The yield in our instance comes from the over-collateralized loans to these institutional borrowers so we originate a loan to them they pay interest that then gets passed through as yield to holders of syrup USDC and syrup USDT

— Paul Frambot

DeFi composability is a unique differentiator for Maple, driving significant growth. I think that DeFi composability has been another unique point where Maple kind of is different to other CeFi lenders and that drove a lot of our growth that we saw in 2025

— Paul Frambot

Users can earn higher yields by using syrup USDC or USDT as collateral on Aave. The important point is that you can earn a higher yield than the cost of borrowing on Aave so it makes sense to post it as collateral to Aave borrow against it mint more syrup USDC or USDT and then post it again to Aave

— Paul Frambot

The integration with Aave incentivizes borrowing and minting more assets. Maple’s products are designed to enhance user returns through strategic partnerships. The composability of DeFi allows for innovative financial strategies and products. Yield generation is a key component of Maple’s business model, attracting institutional clients. The ability to leverage assets on platforms like Aave is a significant advantage for users. DeFi composability offers flexibility and efficiency in financial operations. Strategic partnerships and collaborations The partnership with Athena diversifies asset backing and yield sources for susde holders. The way that that proposal would work is that Athena would use syrup USDC or syrup USDT or our permissioned Maple institutional pool as a source of yield… it provides a yield and then the yield can serve or the yield can be passed on to their susde holders

— Paul Frambot

Aave and Syrup are not competitors but partners that enhance utilization and yield for users. Having syrup USDC on there increases the utilization and the yield available for Aave users… the answer is no we actually work quite well as partners

— Paul Frambot

Strategic partnerships are crucial for expanding yield opportunities in the DeFi space. Collaborations with other platforms enhance the value proposition for Maple’s clients. The DeFi ecosystem thrives on partnerships that drive innovation and growth. Maple’s partnerships are designed to maximize returns for users and stakeholders. The collaborative nature of DeFi protocols is essential for understanding market dynamics. Partnerships with established platforms like Aave provide credibility and trust. The ability to work with other platforms is a strategic advantage for Maple. Collaborations are key to unlocking new opportunities in the DeFi market. Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

PANews reported on April 20 that Maple Finance stated on its X platform that all USDT offered by syrupUSDT on Aave Mantle has been withdrawn, and neither syrupUSDC nor syrupUSDT has any risk exposure related to the rsETH security incident.

Author: PA一线

This content is for market information only and is not investment advice.

Significant developments continue in the cryptocurrency market, and important advancements in the blockchain sector are making headlines. Accordingly, Ethernity, an NFT-focused blockchain company, announced the Ethernity Chain network to the public today through a series of tweets. The most notable feature in the Ethereum Layer-2 network has been the focus on artificial intelligence-driven security solutions.

Ethernity Team Takes a Step with Layer-2Ethereum Layer-2 project Ethernity Chain is drawing attention with its artificial intelligence-focused security measures. The new Layer-2 network, a project focused on entertainment, will be supported by Ethernity’s native token, ERN. The team announced this development on the social media platform X with a series of tweets accompanied by a video featuring famous footballer Lionel Messi.

In the series of tweets, the Ethernity team stated that they expect the global entertainment and media market value to reach $3.5 trillion by 2030. Declaring themselves pioneers in the field with AI-driven security solutions, the team introduced the new Layer-2 network with enhanced security developed through artificial intelligence, integration solutions, low transaction fees, and 100% EVM compatibility. The continuation of the tweet series also highlighted GameFi projects that will be part of the ecosystem, indicating promising developments in this area. Following these developments, the ERN token rose by 20%, attracting attention.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.