Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

Circle Internet Group, the fintech company behind USDC, one of the world’s largest US dollar-backed stablecoins, has secured final approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency to launch Circle National Trust, a federally regulated national trust bank that will oversee key parts of the company’s digital asset infrastructure.

According to a Friday announcement, the approval places the bank under direct OCC supervision and is expected to enhance the regulatory framework supporting USDC through federally regulated custody, with reserve management planned as a future capability.

Advertisement

Circle National Trust will initially provide fiduciary digital asset custody services for Circle and affiliated entities, the company noted. Under its approved business plan, the bank may later expand those services to a limited number of institutional customers, including banks and regulated financial institutions.

Circle also said the charter is designed to eventually allow management of the USDC Reserve within the national trust bank, bringing reserve operations under federal oversight.

The OCC approval marks one of Circle’s most important regulatory achievements to date and reflects the company’s strategy of operating within established financial regulatory frameworks.

The stablecoin issuer has steadily expanded its regulated presence globally, including obtaining approvals under the European Union’s MiCA framework and licenses across multiple international jurisdictions.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

A wave of payment-focused developments announced in June has significantly boosted Solana’s position in the digital finance ecosystem. According to Solana Payments data, Mastercard has launched seamless stablecoin settlement on the Solana network and brought Solana into its machine-centric Agent Pay initiative. These steps in payment infrastructure signal that the Solana network is gaining visibility not just in crypto transactions but also in everyday financial use cases.

Institutional payment adoption gains tractionIn South Korea, leading payment provider KG Inicis reached an agreement to explore stablecoin payments across its merchant network, which processes close to 25 trillion won per year. MoneyGram has also begun staking SOL to participate in network validation while expanding payment services to over 60 million customers worldwide. These moves underline the growing interest among major institutions in integrating Solana’s blockchain for real-world payment scenarios.

As Mastercard rolled out 24/7 stablecoin settlement on Solana, institutions like KG Inicis and MoneyGram have also begun evaluating the network for their payment services.

Digital bank Toss Bank has started pilot testing stablecoin transfers for its 15 million users. SoFiUSD grew its supply on Solana by $200 million within just five weeks. The Solana ecosystem continues to expand with new offerings like the Canadian dollar-backed CADC stablecoin and Open USD, which is supported by a consortium of major financial institutions.

The addition of subscription and allowance features to Solana means that recurring payments, payroll, and invoicing can now be executed directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for third-party apps. The platform also highlights solutions such as international corporate banking, digital prepaid cards, and crypto-based lending products that use wallet behavior instead of traditional credit scores.

Network data points to rapid growthSince January 2025, the amount of stablecoins on the Solana network has surged by 154%, reaching $14.75 billion. Payment volume has jumped 87% compared to the same period last year. Card-based payment transactions alone have totaled $420 million. Solana’s share in the cryptocurrency payments sector climbed from 5.43% to an impressive 10.1%.

IndicatorDataStablecoin supply$14.75 billionIncrease since start of 2025154%Annual payment volume growth87%Card payment volume$420 millionMarket share5.43% → 10.1%According to Birdeye’s data from the first half of 2026, over half of Solana’s stablecoin total is made up of USDC, now spread across 7.54 million wallets. For seven consecutive weeks, Solana has ranked first among blockchains in USDC transfer volume. Birdeye is recognized as a leading crypto analysis platform for on-chain data and market tracking.

Mini glossary: Stablecoin settlement refers to the finalization of payments using digital assets that are typically pegged to fiat currencies like the dollar. USDC is a widely used, dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by Circle.

In the current week alone, the network processed 22.7 million transactions, equivalent to about one third of all USDC transaction volume. During the same period, payroll payments on Solana reached $1.6 billion, with peer-to-peer transfers among retail users totaling $803 million.

Key technical levels in focus for SOLAnalyst Celal Kucuker notes that SOL’s price continues to demonstrate resilience and retains its upward potential. He highlights the $77 level as a critical support zone, marking the intersection of previous price action and important Fibonacci retracement points.

Celal Kucuker assesses that if SOL breaks above the descending monthly trend established at the start of 2025, resistance areas at $145 and $188 may come into play.

Should SOL maintain its position above the downward trendline, the $145 and $188 levels are likely to emerge as the next resistance points. However, if the support is lost, the current bullish scenario may weaken, possibly delaying broader upward momentum in the market.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Robinhood Chain has attracted more than $70 million worth of bridged Ether within its first week, strengthening Ethereum’s role as the settlement layer behind the brokerage’s new tokenized finance network.

Summary

Robinhood Chain has attracted more than $70 million in bridged Ether within its first week after launch. Daily Uniswap trading volume has reached $500 million while total value locked has climbed above $106 million, supported by institutional liquidity. Token Terminal said continued adoption of Robinhood Chain could create a meaningful new source of demand for Ether. Data from Token Terminal showed the Arbitrum-based layer-2 network crossed the milestone after launching on July 1, with the analytics platform saying continued adoption could make the chain “a meaningful new source of demand for ETH.”

ETH bridged from @ethereum (L1) to Robinhood Chain (L2) is up by ~70x in the past week, surpassing $70M@RobinhoodApp Chain uses ETH as its native gas token

If adoption continues, the chain could become a meaningful new source of demand for ethereum:native pic.twitter.com/ihvgnut9Hz

— Token Terminal 📊 (@tokenterminal) July 9, 2026 Robinhood introduced the EVM-compatible network as an “AI-native” blockchain built for real-world assets, using ETH as its native gas token. The launch coincided with the company’s rollout of tokenized US stocks to customers in more than 120 countries, expanding its push into blockchain-based financial products.

Recent on-chain data also points to rapid ecosystem growth. Earlier this week, DeFiLlama data showed Robinhood Chain’s total value locked had climbed above $106 million after large institutional deposits into the Morpho lending protocol, while daily Uniswap trading volume reached $500 million, placing the network behind only Ethereum mainnet over the same period.

Ethereum demand grows alongside Robinhood Chain activity Alongside the rise in bridged assets, Token Terminal said Robinhood Chain has been converting liquidity into on-chain activity. According to the firm, daily active users reached 194,000 while daily revenue climbed to about $39,000, implying an annualized run rate of roughly $14 million.

DeFiLlama reported similar growth, showing the network held 46,748 ETH, worth about $83 million at current prices, before TVL later expanded beyond $100 million. The platform added that inflows on Thursday alone totaled 31,855 ETH, or roughly $55 million.

Commenting on the network’s activity, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams said most transactions on Robinhood Chain are denominated in ETH.

“It’s the base pair for trading, the highest volume asset, and the gas token to pay for blockspace,” Adams wrote, adding that the network also burns ETH on Ethereum’s mainnet to cover data storage costs.

Institutional participation has also accelerated liquidity growth. According to DeFiLlama, nearly $90 million of the chain’s locked value is held on Morpho, where Robinhood Earn offers around 7% annual percentage yield on USDG deposits. The biggest contribution came from Ethena, which deposited $50 million into a Steakhouse Financial-managed USDG vault in a single transaction.

Institutional flows support early momentum The growing activity comes as Robinhood continues expanding its tokenized finance ecosystem. Trading on the network has centered on Wrapped Ether (WETH), memecoins, and tokenized equities including NVDA, AAPL, and GOOG, while Robinhood launched the chain with support for Uniswap’s v2, v3, v4, and UniswapX infrastructure.

RWA.xyz data shows Ethereum and its layer-2 networks account for more than half of the tokenized real-world asset market, giving Robinhood Chain access to an ecosystem that already dominates the sector.

A single compromised oracle just cost someone $292 million. The KelpDAO exploit, which drained 116,500 rsETH through LayerZero’s infrastructure on April 18, marks one of the largest DeFi hacks of the year, and it happened because of something the industry has been quietly ignoring: cross-chain protocols are essentially oracle networks, and oracle networks have single points of failure.

Chronicle Labs CEO Niklas Kunkel put it bluntly. Interoperability protocols like LayerZero and Chainlink CCIP are, at their core, oracles. Every time a project uses cross-chain communication, it’s placing its trust in these verification systems. When that trust gets exploited, the results are catastrophic.

How the attack unfolded The breach targeted LayerZero’s Decentralized Verifier Network, or DVN, which is the infrastructure responsible for validating cross-chain messages. Attackers compromised internal RPC nodes through social engineering, essentially tricking their way into the system rather than breaking through code.

LayerZero Labs published its incident report on May 20, attributing the attack to TraderTraitor, a North Korean threat actor linked to the Lazarus Group.

Advertisement

Here’s the thing about LayerZero’s architecture. It separates oracles (verifiers) from relayers to create a system of checks and balances for cross-chain validation. In theory, this dual-layer approach makes attacks harder. In practice, KelpDAO was running a single-DVN configuration, which meant compromising one verification layer was enough to drain the entire protocol.

The oracle problem nobody wanted to talk about LayerZero’s model was supposed to be different. By letting applications choose their own security configurations, including which DVNs to use and how many to require, the protocol positioned itself as more flexible and potentially more secure than monolithic bridge designs. But flexibility cuts both ways. When projects opt for minimal security setups to save on costs or reduce complexity, they’re effectively choosing speed over safety.

The incident report from LayerZero Labs outlined plans to improve security protocols and eliminate single-DVN setups in future deployments.

When you bridge assets across chains, you’re not just moving tokens. You’re trusting an oracle to correctly verify that a transaction happened on Chain A before releasing funds on Chain B. If that oracle lies, or is forced to lie, the money is gone.

Chronicle Labs and the redundancy argument Chronicle Labs, which Kunkel founded after spinning the company off from MakerDAO in 2023, has been building decentralized oracle infrastructure for both tokenized assets and real-world assets. The firm has historically secured over $20 billion in assets and raised $12 million in seed funding in March 2025.

The company’s pitch centers on redundancy and robust verification, which is exactly the opposite of what failed in the KelpDAO exploit. Rather than allowing single points of failure, Chronicle’s approach emphasizes multiple layers of validation that an attacker would need to compromise simultaneously.

What this means for investors and builders Investors with assets deployed across multiple chains need to understand that every bridge interaction carries oracle risk. A protocol using multiple independent DVNs presents a fundamentally different risk profile than one using a single verifier, even if both run on the same underlying LayerZero technology.

For builders, the cost savings from running minimal verification setups now need to be weighed against the existential risk of a complete protocol drain. LayerZero’s commitment to eliminating single-DVN configurations will likely become an industry standard, not a differentiator.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Bitdeer Technologies has unveiled a $36 million manufacturing facility in Nevada, bringing production of its SEALMINER Bitcoin mining machines to the United States.

Summary

Bitdeer will invest $36 million in a Nevada factory to produce SEALMINER Bitcoin mining machines. The new Sparks facility is expected to begin commercial production by the end of 2026. Bitdeer shares jumped 14.1% as the company reported stronger U.S. manufacturing and 921 BTC mined in May. According to Bitdeer, the new plant in Sparks, Nevada, will manufacture key components for the company’s SEALMINER mining rigs, with commercial production scheduled to begin before the end of 2026. The company said the facility will strengthen its manufacturing capacity inside the United States while reducing its dependence on outside suppliers for critical mining equipment.

Shares of Bitdeer responded positively to the announcement, climbing 14.1% on Thursday to $14.33. Even after the rally, the stock remains about 27% below its June peak, although it has gained roughly 26% since the beginning of the year.

Nevada incentives support local manufacturing expansion Details released by Bitdeer show the Singapore-based company worked with Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo’s administration and local officials before selecting Sparks for the project. According to comments made by Bitdeer CEO Catherine Guo to local media, the state approved tax incentives, including reduced qualifying sales taxes, as part of the investment package supporting the facility.

Commercial production is expected to begin by year-end, allowing Bitdeer to manufacture more of its mining hardware domestically instead of relying as heavily on third-party suppliers. The company said the plant will focus specifically on Bitcoin mining equipment rather than artificial intelligence hardware.

Although the new factory centers on mining machines, Bitdeer has also expanded into AI cloud computing and high-performance computing services in recent years. According to the company, those businesses will continue separately from the Nevada manufacturing operation.

Bitcoin miners continue adding AI businesses Across the industry, publicly traded Bitcoin miners are investing beyond cryptocurrency mining as they seek additional revenue from power-intensive computing businesses.

MARA Holdings announced on Thursday that it plans to acquire a Texas site capable of supporting up to 2 gigawatts of capacity for AI and digital infrastructure projects. The company said the expansion will increase its ability to serve artificial intelligence workloads alongside its existing mining operations.

Earlier in the week, TeraWulf announced a 20-year data center lease agreement with AI startup Anthropic. According to TeraWulf, the contract could generate about $19 billion in revenue over its lifetime, highlighting the growing interest among mining companies in long-term AI infrastructure deals.

While several competitors are directing more resources toward AI data centers, Bitdeer continues expanding both its mining operations and supporting infrastructure. The Nevada facility adds manufacturing to that strategy by giving the company greater control over the production of its own mining hardware.

Separately, Bitdeer’s latest production update showed the company mined 921 Bitcoin during May. According to Bitdeer, the figure represents a 370% increase compared with the same month a year earlier, underscoring the rapid growth of its mining business as it adds new infrastructure and equipment.

The combination of higher Bitcoin production and domestic manufacturing comes as mining companies continue adjusting their business models after the latest Bitcoin halving. While many firms are pursuing AI-related contracts to diversify earnings, Bitdeer’s latest investment keeps its manufacturing expansion closely tied to its core Bitcoin mining business while increasing its presence in the United States.

Public companies went on a Bitcoin shopping spree in Q2 2026 that makes their prior accumulation look like a warm-up lap. Over the quarter, publicly traded firms collectively scooped up 110,000 BTC, a figure that’s 1.8 times the total they acquired across the previous two quarters combined.

Total corporate Bitcoin holdings now exceed 1.26 million BTC, valued at roughly $79 billion. That’s more than 6% of Bitcoin’s hard-capped 21 million supply locked up in public company balance sheets.

Corporations are outpacing the miners Year-to-date through early July 2026, public companies have added a net 166,984 BTC to their reserves. During that same stretch, Bitcoin miners produced approximately 81,153 BTC.

In English: corporations are buying more than twice the amount of new Bitcoin entering existence. When a growing number of buyers compete for a shrinking pool of available coins, the float gets squeezed.

Advertisement

Who’s doing the buying No surprise at the top of the leaderboard. Strategy, the firm formerly known as MicroStrategy, remains the undisputed heavyweight champion of corporate Bitcoin accumulation. The company holds approximately 843,775 to 847,000 BTC.

Interestingly, even Strategy isn’t purely in accumulation mode anymore. The company sold 3,588 BTC in late June and early July, a tiny fraction of its total stack but notable because it represents one of the few times the firm has moved coins out the door rather than in.

Behind Strategy, two names have emerged as serious contenders. Twenty One Capital holds around 43,500 BTC, while Metaplanet has built a position of roughly 43,000 BTC.

The concentration is worth noting. Strategy alone accounts for roughly two-thirds of all publicly held corporate Bitcoin. The remaining third is spread across a growing but still relatively small cohort of companies.

What this means for investors The supply-demand imbalance is the headline risk and opportunity. With corporate buyers absorbing more than double the new supply being mined, Bitcoin’s available float is shrinking in real time.

There’s a reflexivity problem worth watching. Many of these companies fund their Bitcoin purchases by issuing equity or convertible notes. That works beautifully when Bitcoin’s price is rising and investor appetite for these instruments is strong. It works considerably less well during drawdowns, when the same companies face margin pressure and potentially need to sell into weakness. Strategy’s small sale in late June could be a one-off, or it could be a preview of what happens when even the most committed holders need liquidity.

The 6% supply concentration in public company hands also introduces a new category of systemic risk. If a major holder ever faced a forced liquidation, whether from regulatory action, a corporate restructuring, or a leveraged position gone wrong, the market impact could be severe. Bitcoin has never had this much supply held by entities subject to quarterly earnings calls and SEC filings.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

XRP price is up by 1.6% today, July 9, to trade at $1.09 at the time of writing. These gains come as SWIFT announces that it will be working with 17 banks, some of which are affiliated with Ripple, for a pilot phase for its blockchain-based ledger.

SWIFT Partners With Banks For Tokenized Cross-Border Payments SWIFT has announced that it will be working with 17 banks to check whether its blockchain can be used to facilitate payments made between countries.

Some of the banks named in this project, like Standard Chartered and UBS, use Ripple to custody crypto assets or to enable payments across countries using the XRP Ledger.

This initiative comes after Ripple Treasury joined the SWIFT Certified Partner Program in April 2026.

However, an analyst on X notes that Ripple’s partnership with SWIFT might not be bullish for the price of XRP because SWIFT will not use the XRP token on its blockchain-based ledger.

“Sorry $XRP holders, but the “bridge currency” and “liquidity” is tokenized deposits; not a L1 gas token,” the analyst said.

Still, XRP price made a slight gain of 1.5% on the news of SWIFT working with banks affiliated with Ripple.

XRP Technical Outlook as Price Remains Below Key EMA Levels The price of XRP has closed below the 20-day EMA of $1.11 for three straight days. This move suggests that the short-term trend is favoring bears.

If XRP fails to recover above this 20-day EMA, the price could drop to the psychological support of $1.

A drop to $1 could increase selling pressure that could pull the price down to the November 2024 low of $0.87.

However, buyers might come back because geopolitical tensions are easing after Trump said that Iran wants to make a deal for peace to end the conflict that began in February 2026.

This buying pressure could push the XRP price to the 50-day EMA level of $1.17.

XRP Price Chart However, the RSI reading of 43 suggests that the momentum is favoring bears and XRP could drop tp $0.87.

XRP ETFs Record Highest Outflows in Three Months Data from SoSoValue shows that spot XRP ETFs saw $7.29 million in outflows on July 8. This is the highest outflow that these ETFs have seen since March, 2026.

XRP ETF Inflows The outflows suggest that there is low demand for XRP by institutions, and this could make the price to drop to the psychological support of $1.

Data from Coinglass also suggests that the sentiment around XRP is bearish because of the declining long/short ratio. This ratio has dropped to 0.96, suggesting that there are more short positions than long positions.

XRP’s open interest has also dropped from $2.58 billion on July 5 to $2.33 billion today, July 9, suggesting that there is also weak demand coming from speculative traders, and the price could keep dropping.

Rising spot activity alongside falling leverage suggests long-term buyers may be replacing speculative traders.

Ethereum (ETH) is trading at nearly 65% below its all-time high, with attention around the asset at an almost yearly low, even as its largest network upgrade since The Merge is due within weeks.

But an analyst tracking the setup says the gap between weak social interest and steady on-chain usage is the kind of divergence that has often come right before sharp moves for the cryptocurrency.

Glamsterdam Approaches as On-Chain Data Stays Firm In a July 9 post on X, pseudonymous analyst Wise Crypto noted that the Ethereum network has been processing roughly 450,000 active addresses despite social media discussion sitting near yearly lows.

According to them, the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade could become a major catalyst, considering that it could increase Ethereum’s gas limit by three times and cut transaction fees by about 78%. It has also been said that it could lift throughput to about 10,000 transactions per second.

“Major catalyst. Minimal attention,” the market watcher wrote, while naming $1,754 as the ETH level worth watching. A sustained move above that area, according to them, could open the way toward $2,440, while failure to hold support could send the world’s second-largest crypto asset back toward $880.

Looking at CoinGecko data at the time of writing, ETH was trading just a few dollars below Wise Crypto’s stated resistance level, having dipped slightly (about 1%) in 24 hours but still gaining nearly 7% during the past week and about 3% over 30 days.

That quiet backdrop is sitting alongside some unusual exchange data shared by CryptoQuant contributor Amr Taha, who said that Binance’s 30-day ETH open interest change fell to -594,000 ETH earlier in the week, marking its deepest contraction since August 2024. Around the same time, ETH spot volume on OKX climbed to $2.09 billion, 49% higher than its best reading of the year, which was recorded on February 5.

You may also like: ‘Summer of Ethereum Love’ Gaining Steam, Says Lubin, But When Will ETH Price Follow?  Charles Hoskinson Says Ethereum Is Adopting Cardano Ideas Without Credit Bitmine Buys Another 42K ETH as 5% Supply Goal Comes Within Reach According to Taha, the pairing is notable because a leverage flush alongside rising spot volumes probably means that speculators are leaving the market while spot buyers are continuing to stack ETH and not that there’s a broad retreat from the asset.

Executives Talk Up the Cycle While Traders Stay Cautious Ethereum has been rejected at $1,800 three times this week, but that didn’t stop Consensys co-founder Joseph Lubin from saying Wednesday that the “Summer of Ethereum Love is gaining steam,” pointing to newly launched steward groups like Ethlabs working alongside the Ethereum Foundation, and citing the network’s eleven years of uptime as a draw for institutions.

Analyst Michaël van de Poppe struck a similar tone over the weekend, arguing that “the worst period for ETH is over” after the token closed out its third straight quarterly loss of more than 20%, a first in its history. He called the odds of a fourth consecutive drop statistically low and pointed to the pending CLARITY Act as a potential liquidity driver.

Tags:

Por Que a B3 Está Ampliando os Derivativos de Cripto? A bolsa brasileira B3 expandiu sua oferta regulada de derivativos de criptoativos com opções sobre futuros de bitcoin, ether e solana, oferecendo a traders locais e gestores de ativos mais um ambiente para gerenciar exposição a ativos digitais sem precisar migrar para mercados de cripto no exterior.

Os novos contratos passaram a ser negociados em 6 de julho, de acordo com um comunicado da B3. O lançamento inclui opções de compra e venda sobre futuros de bitcoin denominados em reais, enquanto os futuros de ether e solana são denominados em dólares americanos.

O lançamento adiciona mais uma camada à crescente estrutura do mercado regulado de cripto no Brasil. Em vez de oferecer custódia de cripto à vista ou liquidação direta de tokens, a B3 está construindo derivativos listados vinculados a benchmarks de cripto. Essa abordagem permite que participantes institucionais negociem exposição a preços, volatilidade e estratégias de hedge por meio de instrumentos negociados em bolsa, permanecendo dentro de um ambiente de mercado regulado.

O momento também é relevante. O Brasil já é um dos mercados de cripto mais ativos da América Latina, com forte demanda por stablecoins, produtos de investimento em cripto e acesso regulado à negociação. Ao expandir as opções vinculadas a futuros, a B3 está se posicionando como um provedor de infraestrutura local para gestão de risco em cripto, em vez de deixar as atividades de negociação mais avançadas para plataformas no exterior.

Como Funcionam os Novos Contratos? As opções são liquidadas nos contratos futuros subjacentes, não em bitcoin, ether ou solana propriamente ditos. A B3 informou que os produtos não envolvem custódia, transferência ou administração de criptoativos à vista.

Essa distinção é central para o desenho do produto. A liquidação em futuros permite que a bolsa ofereça exposição vinculada a cripto evitando os problemas operacionais associados à posse direta de tokens. Isso também dá a corretoras, gestores de ativos e traders profissionais um framework mais claro para margem, compensação e gestão de risco.

Os contratos são negociados de forma independente das 9h às 18h30, horário local, de acordo com o cronograma de negociação de derivativos da B3. O exercício é automático no vencimento quando a opção está dentro do dinheiro (in the money), a menos que o titular bloqueie o exercício.

Os 3 produtos referenciam índices de cripto da Nasdaq, segundo o anúncio. O contrato futuro de bitcoin da B3 é denominado em reais, enquanto seus futuros de ether e solana são denominados em dólares americanos. Essa divisão dá à exposição em bitcoin uma estrutura em moeda local, enquanto ether e solana permanecem vinculados à precificação em dólares.

Resumo para Investidores As novas opções de cripto da B3 dão aos investidores brasileiros uma forma regulada de negociar volatilidade e proteger exposição sem precisar tomar custódia dos tokens. A estrutura mantém os produtos mais próximos dos mercados de derivativos tradicionais do que da negociação de cripto à vista no exterior.

O Que Isso Significa Para Traders e Gestores de Ativos? Para os traders, a principal mudança é o acesso a opções listadas localmente vinculadas aos principais futuros de cripto. Isso facilita a construção de posições direcionais, o hedge de exposição em futuros, a negociação de volatilidade implícita e a estruturação de estratégias mais complexas envolvendo bitcoin, ether e solana.

Para gestores de ativos, os produtos podem ajudar a gerenciar o risco de portfólio sem depender de plataformas de opções de cripto no exterior. Um mercado listado local também pode reduzir o atrito operacional para empresas que enfrentam restrições internas sobre custódia, risco de contraparte ou negociação fora de bolsas reguladas.

O recurso de exercício automático também aproxima os produtos das práticas padrão do mercado de derivativos. Quando uma opção vence dentro do dinheiro, ela é exercida no contrato futuro subjacente, a menos que o titular bloqueie o exercício. Isso pode simplificar a execução para usuários profissionais, embora também exija gestão ativa de margem e posição próximo ao vencimento.

O desenho do produto pode atrair principalmente participantes que já compreendem a exposição a cripto baseada em futuros. Como as opções são liquidadas em futuros, e não em tokens, os usuários precisam gerenciar os riscos dos contratos futuros subjacentes, incluindo alavancagem, chamadas de margem, base e denominação em moeda.

Por Que Isso Importa Para o Mercado de Cripto do Brasil? O lançamento amplia a aposta da B3 em produtos regulados de cripto, após movimentos anteriores de listar opções de bitcoin, futuros de ether e solana, e preparar contratos de evento vinculados ao bitcoin. A bolsa está construindo um conjunto de ferramentas mais amplo em torno de ativos digitais, mantendo os produtos dentro da estrutura de derivativos listados.

Essa estratégia reflete uma tendência mais ampla na adoção institucional de cripto. Plataformas reguladas não estão apenas oferecendo exposição direta aos preços de cripto. Elas também estão construindo os instrumentos necessários para hedge, negociação de volatilidade e alocação estruturada. As opções são uma parte importante desse mercado porque permitem que os investidores gerenciem o risco de queda, expressem visões sobre volatilidade e criem posições de risco definido.

O mercado brasileiro é especialmente relevante porque a demanda local por exposição a cripto tem crescido junto com os esforços regulatórios para trazer a atividade de ativos digitais para canais financeiros formais. A expansão da B3 dá aos participantes domésticos mais ferramentas, mas também aumenta a importância da liquidez, da precificação transparente e dos controles de risco.

As novas opções não eliminam a volatilidade subjacente das criptomoedas nem a incerteza regulatória. Elas, no entanto, oferecem aos investidores profissionais uma forma mais familiar de gerenciar essa volatilidade dentro da infraestrutura de bolsa do Brasil. Para a B3, o lançamento fortalece seu papel como o principal portal regulado do país para derivativos vinculados a cripto.

Table of contents

Public markets rarely get a direct window into a company’s crypto conviction. Eightco Holdings (NASDAQ: ORBS) just pried that window open. The firm’s July 8 snapshot shows total holdings of roughly $397 million, a figure built from an unusual mix of AI equity stakes and liquid crypto assets. The treasury includes an indirect $90 million position in OpenAI, $18 million in Beast Industries, 16,278 ETH, and 283 million WLD tokens—valued at $149 million at the time of disclosure.

For a Nasdaq-listed entity, the composition reads less like a traditional balance-sheet hedge and more like a concentrated bet on AI infrastructure and on-chain identity. The Ethereum stack alone is large enough to place Eightco among the more exposed public-company ETH holders, even if it still trails dedicated crypto treasury companies by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the Worldcoin (WLD) position dwarfs many crypto-native funds’ allocations to the token and directly ties the company’s fortunes to the adoption curve of the World Network.

What the Treasury Actually Holds The numbers matter because they’re unusually granular. Most corporate disclosures round crypto exposure into a catch‑all “digital assets” line. Eightco separated equity from tokens and named the projects. That level of detail is uncommon and forces the market to price not just crypto volatility but also private AI valuation risk. The $90 million indirect OpenAI stake raises immediate questions about how that valuation was derived—secondary market pricing for OpenAI equity has been choppy, and liquidity is thin. Beast Industries, a smaller position at $18 million, adds another layer of exposure to the AI hardware and robotics sector.

On the crypto side, 16,278 ETH represents roughly $36 million at current prices, assuming a ballpark $2,200 per ether. The bulk of the reported value, however, sits in 283 million WLD tokens. WLD’s fully diluted valuation and trading volumes have swung dramatically over the past year as the project rolled out biometric verification hubs across emerging markets. Holding that many tokens—likely acquired through grant agreements, market purchases, or strategic allocations—creates a direct link between Eightco’s balance sheet and World Network user growth numbers.

A Corporate Treasury Without the Usual Guardrails Public companies that hold crypto typically stick to bitcoin or ether, often citing their liquidity and regulatory clarity. Eightco’s decision to allocate heavily to WLD sits outside that playbook and reflects a different thesis. Instead of treating crypto as a store of value or inflation hedge, the treasury appears structured around ecosystem participation—staking, governance, or alignment with a protocol’s long-term infrastructure play. The Ethereum position and the Worldcoin exposure both point toward a conviction that identity protocols and AI-native distribution rails will accrue value faster than general-purpose smart contract platforms alone.

That approach aligns with a broader shift in institutional thinking tracked by recent tokenization and treasury moves. As real-world asset tokenization crosses $20 billion on-chain and traditional finance firms settle Treasury trades directly on public ledgers, the line between equity holdings and token allocation blurs. Eightco’s structure may look aggressive now, but it’s increasingly part of a pattern where a balance sheet becomes a portfolio of protocol positions.

What Stays Unanswered The press release leaves several holes. There is no disclosed cost basis for the ETH or WLD, making it impossible to judge whether the treasury is deep in profit or exposure is concentrated near entry. The indirect OpenAI stake is not explained—whether through a special-purpose vehicle, secondary purchases, or a fund commitment. Liquidity for that position is unknown, and so is any lockup or redemption schedule.

For WLD, the lack of detail on how tokens were sourced matters. If they came from early grants tied to network contributions, selling restrictions could limit balance-sheet flexibility. If they were purchased on secondary markets, volatility cushions are thinner. Regulatory risk also hovers over Worldcoin in multiple jurisdictions where biometric data collection by a private network continues to attract scrutiny from data protection authorities. A sudden enforcement action would not only hit the token price but could reshape the company’s entire book value overnight.

The disclosure arrives during a week when Ethereum itself sat near the top of developer activity rankings, reinforcing the idea that infrastructure value and treasury allocations are becoming harder to separate. For Eightco, the market now has a clear view of a $397 million wager that mixes two of the most volatile and politically sensitive corners of tech into a single public-company filing. The numbers are big enough that every subsequent quarterly update will be watched for changes in token balances and valuation marks.

AUTHOR

Max delves deep into the cryptocurrency realm, with a passion for altcoins and NFTs. Convinced of crypto's transformative potential, he envisions a decentralized financial future. Max's background in the financial sector grants him unique insights into global monetary systems. In his leisure, Max embraces the thrill of adventures and is an avid sports enthusiast, finding balance and rejuvenation away from work.

Robinhood’s week-old Earn product has a clear favorite, and it’s not even close. Ethena’s USDe synthetic dollar has emerged as the dominant collateral asset in the lending vault powering Robinhood’s new yield offering, with users overwhelmingly routing their deposits through the protocol.

The Earn product, which launched July 1 alongside Robinhood Chain itself, lets users lend USDG, a stablecoin issued by Robinhood, into a Morpho-powered vault curated by Steakhouse Financial. The estimated return: 7% APY from borrower interest.

How the vault actually works Users deposit USDG into the vault, which then lends those funds to borrowers who post collateral. That collateral comes from three sources: Ethena’s USDe, Spark’s spUSDG, and Maple’s SyrupUSDG.

Advertisement

As of July 8, Ethena accounts for approximately $100 million of the stablecoin supply on Robinhood Chain. The total supply has surpassed $200 million, meaning Ethena represents roughly 50% of all stablecoins circulating on the chain. That’s a commanding position for a protocol that only listed its ENA governance token on Robinhood back in November 2025.

Insurance coverage for the vault has been arranged through Lloyd’s of London and RELM, covering risks associated with smart contracts and cyber threats.

Why Ethena keeps winning distribution battles USDe works differently from traditional stablecoins like USDC or USDT. Rather than holding dollar reserves in bank accounts, Ethena maintains its peg through a delta-neutral hedging strategy, essentially holding crypto assets while shorting equivalent positions in perpetual futures. The yield comes from funding rates that perpetual futures traders pay.

What this means for investors Robinhood had roughly 24 million funded accounts the last time it reported figures. For ENA token holders, more USDe demand generally means more protocol revenue. The token has been trading on Robinhood since November 2025, giving retail users a direct way to express a thesis on the protocol’s growth.

Ethena’s roughly 50% share of on-chain stablecoin supply suggests users and capital allocators are expressing a strong preference over the two other collateral providers, Spark and Maple. The exact asset allocation percentages among the collateral providers have not been disclosed.

The product is progressively rolling out to U.S. users. Smart contract vulnerabilities, funding rate compression, and regulatory scrutiny of yield products remain live concerns.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Bitwise has added Hyperliquid’s HYPE token to the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF, known by the ticker BITW. The move places HYPE inside a fund that gives investors exposure to a basket of large crypto assets rather than a single token.

Summary

Hyperliquid entered BITW after strong trading activity pushed HYPE into Bitwise’s top large-cap crypto basket. DOT and AVAX lost BITW spots as HYPE and XLM met the index’s rebalancing criteria. Crypto.news coverage shows HYPE ETF demand rose quickly before early outflows tested the narrative later. Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) Adds HYPE, Removes DOT and AVAX

Bitwise has officially added Hyperliquid (HYPE) to the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW), the world's largest crypto index fund. Hyperliquid posted strong performance in the first half of 2026, recording $1.34… pic.twitter.com/3eF4tiPpj4

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) July 9, 2026 Bitwise describes BITW as the “world’s first and largest crypto index fund.” The product tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, which covers the largest screened crypto assets by market value.

DOT and AVAX leave the basket The latest holdings data, dated July 7, 2026, show Hyperliquid in the fund with a weight close to 1%. Reports placed HYPE’s share near 0.95%. The same update also showed Stellar entering the fund, while Polkadot and Avalanche were removed.

The change follows Bitwise’s latest index reconstitution. BITW rebalances monthly and weights assets by market cap after screening. That means tokens can enter or leave the fund when rankings, liquidity, and index checks change.

Hyperliquid’s growth draws more attention Hyperliquid has gained more market attention this year because of its trading activity. The platform reportedly recorded $1.34 trillion in trading volume and $320 million in revenue in the first half of 2026. HYPE was also reported to have gained 165% year-to-date before entering BITW.

The move also follows rising interest in HYPE-linked products. Crypto.news reported that HYPE ETFs crossed $100 million in cumulative net inflows as traditional finance investors increased exposure to Hyperliquid. Another crypto.news report later noted that the Bitwise HYPE ETF saw its first daily outflow after 16 straight inflow days.

Index entry adds visibility for HYPE HYPE’s addition gives Hyperliquid more visibility inside a diversified crypto product. For investors, the entry means HYPE now sits inside a familiar index wrapper managed by Bitwise. Still, its fund weight remains small compared with Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Bitwise’s holdings remain subject to change because BITW adjusts with the market. HYPE’s entry shows that Hyperliquid has reached the size and market standing needed for Bitwise’s index basket. Future rebalances could change the mix again if market caps and screening results move.

HYPE trades near $68 after roughly tripling from its March low of $25.64, a run built during one of the most risk-averse stretches crypto has seen since 2022.

Global retail crypto activity contracted for two straight quarters through Q1, yet Hyperliquid’s token set an all-time high at $76.90 in June. Understanding why it outperformed in risk-off conditions explains why a risk-on turn could compound the effect rather than replace it.

Summary HYPE tripled from $25.64 in March to a $76.90 high in June. At peak activity, $2.3M in daily fees funded $11M in HYPE buybacks. Seven of Hyperliquid’s top ten markets by volume are now equities or commodities. Price is coiling between support at $67 and a triple-tested ceiling near $74. Why It Worked in a Risk-Off Market Most crypto assets need risk appetite to rise, because their value rests on future adoption stories that get discounted harder when money turns defensive. HYPE’s value rests on something that gets paid daily: trading fees. And trading volume does not need optimism, it needs movement. The first half of 2026 delivered movement in abundance, from a 22% Bitcoin drawdown in Q1 to an oil shock during the West Asia crisis, and every violent session generated fees regardless of direction.

The mechanism that converts those fees into price support is the buyback. Hyperliquid routes the overwhelming majority of its protocol revenue into an Assistance Fund that buys HYPE on the open market, continuously, with no discretionary committee deciding when. At peak activity this year the platform generated $2.3 million in daily fees, funding $11 million in buybacks. More volume means more fees, more fees mean a larger standing bid under the token, and the purchased supply comes out of circulation. It is the crypto equivalent of an aggressive corporate buyback program, except executed block by block. That bid is why drawdowns in HYPE kept finding buyers while tokens with no revenue link bled without support: part of the demand is mechanical.

The risk-on case stacks on top rather than replacing this. Defensive markets gave Hyperliquid volatility-driven volume in oil, gold, and liquidations. A risk-on turn adds the other engine: expanding crypto speculation, altcoin leverage, and new listings, on a platform that already processes roughly 70% of all on-chain perpetuals volume. HYPE is one of the few large tokens with a credible claim to both regimes.

No Longer a Crypto Exchange That Happens to List Oil The deeper change came through HIP-3, the October 2025 upgrade that lets anyone staking 500,000 HYPE deploy their own perpetual futures markets on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure. Builders used it to list what crypto never had: tokenized Nvidia, Tesla, and S&P 500 contracts, WTI and Brent crude, gold, silver, FX, even pre-IPO names like SpaceX. Open interest across these builder-deployed markets grew from about $790 million in January to over $3 billion by early June, according to OAK Research.

The composition tells the real story. Oil and precious metals alone drove over 67% of HIP-3 volume in Q1, WTI crude perpetuals reached $1.27 billion in daily volume in March, and seven of Hyperliquid’s top ten markets by volume are now equities or commodities rather than crypto pairs. The killer feature is the clock: these markets never close, and when the West Asia crisis broke over weekends with traditional commodity venues dark, traders priced oil on Hyperliquid, pushing HIP-3 to as much as 40% of total platform volume. Non-crypto assets showed 60% trader retention in late March, the signature of a durable product rather than a novelty.

Every one of those barrels and shares feeds the same machine. HIP-3 markets charge roughly double native fee rates, half to the deployer and half to the protocol, so the buyback engine now runs on oil volatility and equity earnings seasons as well as crypto cycles. Deployers also lock 500,000 HYPE each just to participate, removing further supply. The scale of the shift has forced traditional finance to respond: ICE chief executive Jeffrey Sprecher, whose company owns the NYSE, called Hyperliquid “bigger than Nasdaq” at a May conference, while Grayscale Research wrote in June that the platform now looks “more like Amazon Web Services than a stock exchange.”

Coiling Under a Triple-Tested Ceiling The daily chart shows the June blow-off resolving into compression, not breakdown. Price at $68 sits above the rising 50-day moving average at $64.68, with the full average stack still in bullish order after the March-to-June trend tripled the token.

Daily technical analysis chart for Hyperliquid/USD, illustrating current price trends and technical indicators. The structure is a sequence of lower highs, $76.90, then roughly $74, then $71.50, pressing onto a horizontal shelf at $66.50 to $67 that has been defended repeatedly since late June. Below the shelf, a fresh ascending trendline and the 50-day converge, stacking three supports into a $2.50 window between $64.50 and $67. RSI at 53 has reset from overbought to neutral while price gave back little, which is digestion, not distribution. The triggers are clean: a daily close above $71.50 breaks the lower-high sequence and opens the $74 ceiling, with $76.90 the only level beyond it. A close below $64.50 takes out shelf, trendline, and 50-day together, exposing thin air down to the $53 to $54 zone where the 100-day is rising. Between $67 and $71.50, the chart is noise.

Where the Machine Can Break The buyback engine is reflexive, and reflexivity cuts both ways. If volume contracts, fees fall, buybacks shrink, and the mechanical bid weakens exactly when the token needs it most. The flywheel that amplified the rally can amplify a genuine downturn too.

Concentration is the second risk. A single deployer, TradeXYZ, accounts for more than 90% of HIP-3 open interest, so the non-crypto growth story currently rests on one team’s oracles, liquidity management, and continued good standing. HIP-3 markets are also not backstopped by Hyperliquid’s native liquidity pool; each deployer stands alone.

Regulation is the third and largest. The UK’s FCA lists the platform as unauthorized, Singapore has raised its own flag, and CME Group and ICE have formally warned US authorities about 24/7 synthetic markets in strategic commodities forming prices outside regulated frameworks while traditional venues are closed. When the exchanges Hyperliquid is disrupting start lobbying, the compliment is real, and so is the threat. Synthetic stock perpetuals sit in a gray zone that a single enforcement action could darken quickly.

The technical reality suggests HYPE’s next leg could depend on which arrives first: a volume regime that keeps the buyback engine fed, or a regulatory shock that tests the 90%-concentrated foundation. The chart has compressed the decision into a narrow band. Above $71.50, a token with revenue in both risk regimes could trade back toward price discovery. Below $64.50, the market might signal the machine’s output is already priced. What the first half already proved is narrower but real: Hyperliquid no longer needs a crypto bull market to generate demand for its token. A risk-on turn may be simply be the first time both engines run at once.

The platform whose homepage promises no presales and no team allocations is about to release roughly $130 million of presale and team tokens into a market that trades half that much in a day. The July 12 PUMP unlock, landing one year to the day after its record-breaking ICO, is the sharpest test yet of whether the fair-launch economy’s own house token can survive the mechanics it imposes on everyone else.

Summary

Pump.fun’s July 12 unlock releases 82.5 billion PUMP, worth roughly $130 million, into a thin daily trading market. The unlock tests the contradiction between Pump.fun’s fair-launch branding and its own allocated ICO and insider vesting schedule. PUMP’s buybacks and burns have been unusually aggressive, but they have not stopped the token’s steep drawdown. The key question is whether insiders and investors hold, hedge, or sell newly liquid tokens after the cliff. Saturday’s outcome will set a precedent for revenue-backed tokens facing large vesting overhangs. There is a sentence on Pump.fun’s homepage that reads like a manifesto: coins are instantly tradable on a transparent bonding curve, no liquidity to seed, no presales, no team allocations. It is the creed of the fair-launch economy the platform built, the promise that made it the center of Solana’s on-chain trading culture and, by Grayscale’s recent accounting, one of the three applications driving the entire network’s growth, with roughly 1.3 million monthly active users and daily revenue around $690,000.

On Saturday, July 12, the platform’s own token will supply the exception. An 82.5 billion PUMP cliff unlock, worth roughly $130 million depending on the day’s price, vests to precisely the categories the homepage disavows: about 50 billion tokens to the team and 32.5 billion to existing investors, together equal to 29.23% of the circulating supply. Recent daily trading volume in PUMP has run between $55 million and $70 million, meaning the unlock is roughly twice the size of everything the market currently trades in a day. And the calendar adds its own cruelty: the cliff expires one year to the day after the July 12, 2025 initial coin offering in which Pump.fun sold 150 billion tokens at $0.004, raising $600 million in twelve minutes, part of $1.32 billion in total token-sale proceeds. The token trades near $0.0015 today, down more than 60% from that ICO price and over 80% from its 2025 peak.

This piece treats the unlock as what it is: the clearest stress test yet staged of the fair-launch era’s central contradiction, a platform that industrialized instant, allocation-free token launches while financing itself through the largest allocated sale in memecoin history. It walks through the mechanics of Saturday’s cliff and why cliff unlocks are uniquely violent, the platform’s extraordinary and so far losing battle to defend its token with burned revenue, the bull and bear cases for absorption, the Ansem airdrop debate over what the platform owes its users, and what the outcome will signal for every token with a vesting schedule, which is to say nearly all of them.

The mechanics: what actually happens Saturday Token unlocks are scheduled supply events, and this one is a cliff, the harshest shape a vesting schedule can take. Rather than dripping tokens to insiders over months, a cliff holds everything back and releases a block at once; Saturday’s block is 82.5 billion tokens against a circulating base of roughly 400 billion, which is why the same event can be described as 29% of circulating supply and just under 10% of the eventual trillion-token total. Tokenomist’s vesting data attributes the tranche to existing investors and the team, with the investor slice worth about $48 million and the team slice about $74 million at recent prices.

What an unlock does to price is not mechanical dilution, a point unlock analysis gets wrong in both directions. The tokens exist already; what changes is that they become sellable, converting locked paper wealth into potential order flow. Whether they become actual order flow depends on the recipients, and that is unknowable in advance: investors from a $0.004 ICO remain underwater at $0.0015 and may prefer to wait; a team sitting on nine figures of newly liquid tokens may sell nothing, or hedge quietly through derivatives, or drip supply out over months. The market’s problem is that it must price the possibility before observing the behavior, which is why unlocks front-run themselves: the fear arrives on schedule even when the selling does not, the same anticipatory arithmetic that governs every large scheduled release in crypto, from Pi’s monthly drip to the industry-wide $776 million calendar this very week, where PUMP’s cliff is the largest single event.

The order-book context is what makes this cliff unusually sharp. Against $55-70 million of daily volume, $130 million of new sellable supply cannot exit through the market quickly without moving it violently; every large sale in a thin book pays an execution cost that compounds as depth runs out, which disciplines rational sellers into patience but also means any impatient seller inflicts disproportionate damage. Derivatives complete the picture: funding on PUMP perps has been mildly positive into the event, and the presence of liquid perp markets means insiders did not need to wait for Saturday to monetize; anyone sophisticated could have shorted against their locked position months ago, converting the cliff from a decision point into a settlement date. If a meaningful share of the tranche is already hedged, Saturday’s visible selling will understate what was economically sold long ago.

The business behind the token Judging the unlock requires separating two things the market constantly conflates: Pump.fun the business and PUMP the token, because the first is among crypto’s genuine success stories and the second has been among its disappointments, and the gap between them is where Saturday’s outcome will be decided.

The business case is not seriously contested. Pump.fun industrialized token creation, launching well over a million coins through a bonding-curve model that requires no code, no seeded liquidity, and no permission, then graduated the survivors to its own PumpSwap venue after cutting external exchanges out of the pipeline in 2025. Grayscale’s recent Solana research named it one of three applications powering the network’s on-chain economy, crediting roughly 1.3 million monthly active users and daily revenue near $690,000; the platform’s own recent prints run around $900,000 in daily fees. Cumulatively, the machine has generated revenue in the high hundreds of millions, a figure almost no crypto-native application outside the major exchanges and Hyperliquid can match. At one point this spring its revenue run rate surpassed Hyperliquid’s, a comparison that flattered both.

The token’s case has been harder from birth, because the token was never required for anything. PUMP launched as an explicitly optional asset, promotions, potential fee rebates, brand alignment, layered onto a protocol that works identically without it, and the market has priced that optionality with brutal literalism: a $600 million market capitalization against a business whose revenue would justify multiples of that under any conventional framework, because no mechanism compels the revenue and the token to meet. The buyback program is the attempted bridge, and the fee overhaul is the attempted engine upgrade, and the unlock is 82.5 billion new claims on a bridge still under construction. That is the actual bet Saturday prices: not whether Pump.fun is a good business, which is settled, but whether PUMP has become the instrument through which the business’s value travels, which is not.

The vesting structure sharpens the question. Of the trillion-token total supply, roughly 400 billion circulates today; behind Saturday’s 82.5 billion sit a further 330 billion locked tokens plus a 240 billion tranche whose disposition is listed simply as to-be-determined, which means the market must price not one cliff but a mountain range, with this weekend’s event as the first serious peak. Every argument about absorption therefore doubles as an argument about precedent: a market that gags on tranche one reprices every tranche behind it, and a market that swallows it cleanly compresses the discount on the whole schedule at once.

The buyback war: $600 million of defense, and a losing scoreboard What makes PUMP the perfect specimen for this test is that no token in crypto has been defended harder. Pump.fun is that rarity, a memecoin-economy business with enormous real revenue, and it has spent that revenue on its token with an aggression that makes traditional buyback programs look timid.The record: as of early January, the platform had spent $233 million buying back 62.2 billion PUMP. In April it went further, executing a $370 million burn that destroyed roughly 36% of the then-circulating supply in a single stroke, and committing half of all platform revenue to automated buybacks and burns for a year. Co-founder Alon Cohen framed the philosophy plainly: every dollar not burned is a dollar being put to work toward the same outcome. Measured as capital returned relative to market capitalization, this is among the most intense buyback regimes any asset has run, crypto or otherwise, the same revenue-recycling architecture that powered Hyperliquid’s token to its structural rally, applied at comparable intensity.

The scoreboard, though, reads differently. HYPE rode its buyback engine toward all-time highs; PUMP burned a third of its supply and remains more than 80% below its peak, with an earlier buyback phase visibly failing against sustained whale selling in late 2025. The divergence is the most instructive data point in the entire buyback debate, because it isolates the variable: Hyperliquid’s buybacks recycle fees from a business whose volumes grew relentlessly, while Pump.fun’s recycle fees from a business whose activity peaked with the memecoin mania and now runs at a fraction of it, roughly $775,000 of daily revenue against days that once cleared multiples of that. Buybacks amplify a trajectory; they do not reverse one. A platform buying its token with shrinking revenue is bailing with a bucket whose size is set by the leak.

That is the machine Saturday’s supply lands on. The bull case for absorption leans on it: half of revenue, roughly $400,000 a day at current run rates, is a standing bid of about $12 million a month, and the April burn proved the treasury will act discretionarily and at scale when it chooses. The bear case does the division: at current revenue, the automated program would need most of a year to absorb the unlock alone, before touching the further 330 billion tokens still locked behind it, and the demand-side evidence, an 80%-plus drawdown through the most aggressive supply destruction in the sector, suggests the bid that matters has been structurally absent since the ICO cohort was formed.

One comparison calibrates the buyback machine’s scale honestly. Publicly listed companies are considered aggressive when they return 5-10% of market capitalization to shareholders annually; Pump.fun’s April burn alone destroyed value equal to roughly 60% of the token’s current market capitalization, and the standing program adds double-digit annualized percentages on top. No equity on earth defends itself at that intensity, and the fact that the defense has coincided with an 80% drawdown is the strongest single piece of evidence in the bear case, not because the buybacks failed at their mechanical job, supply genuinely shrank, but because they revealed how large the other side of the ledger was: the ICO cohort’s exit demand, the airdrop-less community’s indifference, and a broader market repricing the entire launchpad category. Buybacks are a transfer to whoever is selling, and for a year, the sellers have accepted the transfer and kept selling.

Fair launch for thee: the contradiction at the center

The unlock’s symbolism deserves direct treatment, because it is not incidental to the price question; it is entangled with it.Pump.fun’s cultural product was always fairness-as-spectacle: anyone can launch, everyone enters on the same curve, insiders do not exist because there is nothing to be inside of. That proposition trained millions of traders and generated over a million token launches, and it made the platform’s own financing choice, a 33% ICO allocation plus team, investor, community, and ecosystem tranches on vesting schedules, read as a quiet exemption from the house rules. The July 2025 sale was legal, disclosed, and oversubscribed in minutes; it was also, structurally, everything the homepage says does not happen here. Saturday is the day the exemption becomes supply.

The community’s response has crystallized around a demand articulated most loudly by the trader Ansem: that the platform owes its users an airdrop, on the order of $250-300 million, before or alongside the insider unlock, both as restitution to the trenches that generated its revenue and as a demand-side event large enough to meet the supply-side one. The platform has so far chosen destruction over distribution, in Cohen’s framing, burning value for all holders rather than gifting it to some, and critics answer that burns reward the ICO cohort and insiders pro rata while airdrops would reward usage, and that a platform whose moat is community loyalty is choosing the shareholder-style tool precisely when the community-style one is needed. Ansem’s version is nakedly practical: a stimulus to the trenches, timed to a Solana resurgence, would flip sentiment at breakneck speed. Underneath the tactical debate sits the structural one, the same question every fee-generating protocol now faces about who protocol revenue actually belongs to, and Pump.fun’s answer on Saturday, burn, distribute, or hold, will be read as precedent across the launchpad economy.

There is also a fee-system subplot with real stakes: the platform is overhauling its creator economics for 2026, replacing the Dynamic Fees V1 model with market-driven pricing and Creator Fee Sharing that lets a coin’s fees flow to up to ten wallets, with transferable ownership and revocable update authority. It is a genuine product answer to the platform’s deepest criticism, that it monetized an economy in which almost everyone else lost money, and its adoption curve will decide whether the revenue feeding the buyback machine grows again or keeps shrinking. The unlock and the fee overhaul are the same story on two timescales: whether Pump.fun can convert extraction into an economy durable enough to value its token.

The recipients’ own incentive map deserves one more pass, because it is less one-sided than the fear suggests. The team’s 50 billion tokens belong to operators of a business that still prints near a million dollars a day, whose personal wealth is overwhelmingly in the platform’s future, not this tranche, and whose every sale will be watched on-chain by the most forensic community in crypto; dumping into their own unlock would be economically minor for them and reputationally expensive. The investors’ 32.5 billion is the truly unpredictable slice, funds with their own limited partners, their own marks, and, at prices 60% below the ICO, their own awkward conversations. The likeliest split, insiders slow, funds mixed, is precisely the ambiguity the market cannot price in advance and will read obsessively in wallet flows from Saturday onward.

How unlocks actually trade: the front-running problem The empirical literature on token unlocks, and by 2026 there is one, converges on a finding that reframes Saturday: unlock damage is mostly done in advance. Studies of large vesting events across hundreds of tokens find underperformance concentrating in the weeks before the date, as informed holders pre-position, market makers widen, and derivative shorts accumulate against the locked supply, with the event itself frequently marking a local low rather than starting a decline. The mechanism is simple: the date is public, the size is public, and markets do not wait for scheduled news. PUMP’s chart into this week is consistent with the pattern, chopping near all-time-low territory while the broader Solana complex rallied, and its perp funding staying mildly positive suggests the short side is already crowded, which is the configuration in which unlock days produce squeezes instead of collapses, the sell-the-rumor crowd covering into the fact.

The counter-pattern also exists, and honesty requires naming it: cliffs to insiders who genuinely need liquidity, teams meeting obligations, funds returning capital to their own investors, produce sustained post-unlock distribution that no amount of pre-positioning absorbs, visible as weeks of steady exchange inflows from vesting wallets. The 2025-26 unlock calendar is littered with both outcomes, and the differentiating variable, studied across events, is less the unlock’s size than the recipients’ situation: underwater venture positions in a dead market sell relentlessly; profitable insiders at a platform with ongoing revenue tend to drip or hold. PUMP’s recipients occupy an unusual cell in that matrix, underwater relative to the ICO on paper, attached to a business still printing near a million dollars a day, and publicly lobbied by their own community to convert the moment into a distribution event instead. There is no clean precedent for that combination, which is part of what makes Saturday informative.

One more structural note: the unlock lands into a week in which the entire market is digesting more than $776 million of scheduled releases across Aptos, RedStone, and others, the routine weekly weather of an industry whose 2021-24 financing choices are now permanent supply infrastructure. PUMP is the week’s largest single event and its most symbolically loaded, but it is not an anomaly; it is the fair-launch platform taking its turn in the same vesting queue as everyone it was supposed to be different from.

What Saturday will actually reveal Strip away the drama and the unlock resolves into observable outcomes with clean interpretations.The constructive scenario: elevated volume without a lasting price break, little visible flow from vesting wallets to exchanges, the automated buyback continuing through the event, and price reclaiming its pre-unlock level within days. That outcome would say the cliff was pre-hedged, pre-priced, or met by real demand, and it would be the strongest evidence yet that PUMP’s holder base has rotated from ICO exit-seekers to buyers of the fee stream. The destructive scenario: heavy volume with price deterioration that holds, exchange-bound transfers from recipient wallets, and funding flipping decisively negative, which would say the insiders wanted out, the book could not carry them, and the further 330 billion locked tokens behind this tranche should be priced as a standing overhang rather than a formality. And there is a third, likeliest scenario, the muddled one: a spike, a partial recovery, ambiguous wallet flows, and both camps declaring vindication, in which case the tell shifts to the following weeks, whether the buyback’s pace changes, whether the team communicates a lockup extension or distribution plan, and whether revenue, the ultimate arbiter, turns.

For the wider market, the reading is bigger than one token. PUMP is the house token of the venue that created more tokens than any mechanism in history, and its unlock is the fair-launch economy grading its own homework: whether a platform built on the premise that allocations are the original sin can carry an allocated token through its own cliff. A clean absorption validates the buyback-and-burn defense every revenue protocol is now copying. A failure hands the sector a precedent it will not enjoy, that even nine figures of burned revenue cannot outbid a vesting schedule, and sharpens the question hanging over the entire launchpad model in a market where scheduled supply meets scarce demand everywhere at once. Either way, July 12 stops being an anniversary and becomes a data point, and unusually for crypto, everyone agreed in advance what it would measure.

The wider Solana context adds a final layer of stakes. The unlock arrives just as the network’s fortunes have turned visibly upward, ecosystem activity leading the majors, tokenized-stock volumes and new consumer apps drawing institutional commentary, Grayscale spotlighting the chain’s application economy with Pump.fun as a named pillar. A clean absorption would let PUMP participate in a Solana narrative that is, for the first time in months, running without it; a failed one would hand the chain’s critics their counterexample, the flagship application economy unable to support its own flagship token. Platform and network are entangled in both directions, since Pump.fun’s fee machine is itself a meaningful share of Solana’s on-chain activity, and the trenches that Ansem wants airdropped are the same user base every Solana consumer app is competing to retain.

There is also a governance-shaped question waiting past Saturday that deserves a closing note: what a platform of this profitability eventually does with control. Pump.fun has so far kept every meaningful decision, fees, burns, the overhaul, distribution policy, in the founding team’s hands, with PUMP conferring no governance whatsoever, and that concentration is defensible in a young company and increasingly conspicuous in a cash-machine. Every path forward, a fee-sharing token model, a governance handover, continued benevolent centralization, has a live example elsewhere in crypto, and each reprices the token differently. The unlock will settle what the insiders’ tokens are worth this quarter; what the token is actually for remains the platform’s largest open design question, and the community pressure crystallizing around the airdrop demand suggests the answer will not stay deferred forever.

Saturday, then, carries more freight than one token’s chart: a referendum on buyback defenses, a test of the vesting economy’s worst-case shape, a Solana bellwether, and the fair-launch movement grading its own exception. Few scheduled events in this market cycle have been assigned so many meanings in advance, which is itself the final irony for a platform built on tokens that launch with no schedule at all.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset markets are volatile and you can lose your entire investment. Figures are current as of July 9, 2026, and may change. Always do your own research.

A breakdown of the latest and most significant updates around Ripple and XRP.

Ripple announced several deals and key partnerships over the past few days, further boosting the buzz surrounding the company.

However, the positive news has failed to trigger a major resurgence for XRP, yet certain analysts believe a big breakout could be on the horizon.

The Recent Developments On July 4, the USA celebrated its 250th Independence Day, a historic milestone filled with nationwide special events. Ripple joined the festivities by partnering with a nonprofit that helps unemployed veterans find high-quality jobs after service. The ultimate goal is to secure jobs for 200,000 affected people by 2030, with Ripple matching donations up to $10,000.

Two days later, the company disclosed breaking news from the other side of the globe. It received full authorization as a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) from Luxembourg’s Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), allowing the firm to offer its regulated payments platform throughout the European Economic Area (EEA).

Shortly after, Ripple shook hands with the Kansas Jayhawks, also known as KU (the athletic teams representing the University of Kansas). Per the partnership’s conditions, XRP’s logo will appear on all of their uniforms. Speaking on the matter was Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, who said:

“Rare moment where my professional and personal worlds collide: XRP is now the first crypto on the jersey of a major college athletics program, at my alma mater.”

Just recently, the X account BSCN revealed that the US supply chain firm Made in USA has selected the XRP Ledger to power its verification and product certification system. According to the entity, blockchain will provide immutable records that help verify the origin and authenticity of local products.

The ETF Front Spot XRP ETFs saw significant capital inflows over the past few months, highlighting growing institutional appetite for the asset. The first company to issue such a fund (with 100% exposure to the token) is Canary Capital, followed by Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, 21Shares, and Grayscale. Since day 1, these investment vehicles have generated a cumulative total net inflow of almost $1.5 billion.

You may also like: Ripple Rolls Out New XRPL Upgrade, but Less Than Half of Nodes Have Upgraded Ripple Lands Major XRP Partnership as Garlinghouse Shares Rare Personal Moment Japanese Firms Are Boosting BTC and XRP Holdings – SBI VC Trade Reveals Why Spot XRP ETFs have had only four red days since April, with July 8 being one of them. This stands in sharp contrast to spot BTC ETFs, which have been bleeding heavily over the past few months.

Spot XRP ETFs, Source: SoSoValue XRP Price Outlook As of press time, Ripple’s cross-border token trades at around $1.09, a minor 1.3% increase on a weekly scale. According to X user MikybullCrypto, the current price level represents a “lifetime opportunity entry,” as the analyst set a target of $5 and potentially even higher.

For their part, Crypto Coral spotted that XRP is compressing inside a triangle, with the valuation currently reacting from a key support zone. “Structures this large often lead to significant moves once resistance gives way,” they added.

Tags:

Circle’s EURC launch on Base is a small but important stablecoin infrastructure move. It brings a native euro-denominated token to one of the most watched Ethereum layer-2 networks at a time when European regulation is becoming much more concrete.

That combination matters. Base needs more native liquidity tools, and Circle needs to show that its MiCA-compliant strategy can translate into useful distribution across active networks.

For more details, visit the official Circle platform.

TL;DR Circle launched native EURC on Base.The rollout gives the Ethereum layer-2 a euro-denominated stablecoin aligned with Circle’s MiCA strategy.It adds another liquidity building block for Base as regulated stablecoin competition intensifies. Why EURC On Base Matters Most crypto liquidity is still dollar-denominated, but euro stablecoins are becoming more important as MiCA changes the European operating environment. A native EURC deployment gives Base users a cleaner way to move euro liquidity without relying only on bridged or wrapped assets.

For developers, native stablecoins can matter because they reduce friction in payments, DeFi, and trading pairs. For users, they make the network feel more complete.

Circle’s MiCA Advantage Circle has been positioning itself as one of the stablecoin issuers most prepared for Europe’s new rulebook. EURC on Base fits that strategy because it combines regulatory positioning with distribution on a fast-growing chain.

The broader stablecoin market is becoming more regional and more regulated. That means issuers with clear licenses and compliant products may be able to capture share where unregulated tokens face restrictions.

Base Gets Another Liquidity Piece For Base, the launch adds to an ecosystem already trying to build depth across DeFi, payments, and consumer applications. Stablecoins are the settlement layer for much of that activity.

If EURC finds real usage, it could help Base become more attractive to European users and projects looking for euro-denominated on-chain rails.

The Part That Matters The useful way to read this story is not as a standalone headline about Circle, but as part of the wider pressure building around Stablecoins coverage this week. Markets have been jumping quickly from one catalyst to the next, so the cleaner value for readers is in separating the actual development from the instant reaction around it. In this case, the source material gives us a concrete event to work from, rather than a loose rumour or a recycled social-media talking point.

That distinction matters because crypto readers are being asked to process a lot at once: ETF flows, regulatory actions, exchange listings, protocol upgrades, wallet movements, and political signals. A story like this is most useful when it helps them understand where EURC fits into that broader map. It does not need to be inflated into a guaranteed price call to be worth covering. It simply needs to explain what changed, who is affected, and why the market is paying attention today.

The caveat is also important. Even clean source-backed developments can be overinterpreted when traders are hunting for a fast narrative. A listing does not automatically create lasting demand, a regulatory update does not immediately settle every legal question, and an on-chain movement does not always translate into a finished sale. The better read is to treat the development as a fresh data point and then watch whether follow-up activity confirms the direction of travel.

For NewsBTC readers, that means keeping the focus on what can actually be verified from the source and avoiding the temptation to turn every update into a sweeping market verdict. The story is strong enough on its own terms: it gives investors and traders another piece of context around Stablecoins, while leaving room for the next filing, dashboard update, wallet movement, governance vote, or exchange notice to decide whether the angle grows into something bigger.

This article is based on information from Circle.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

In This Article What the Ethereum Paper Actually ProposesHoskinson's Prior Art ArgumentCardano Community Reaction and the Convergence ArgumentLeios and What Comes Next for Cardano Ethereum researchers have published a paper proposing native UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) support for the network’s execution layer, and Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson responded on X with a pointed claim: Cardano has been running this model for over a decade, and Ethereum is arriving late without acknowledgment.

In a July 7 tweet, Hoskinson said: “It’s not like I’ve been literally working on this topic for over 10 years of my life and launched a cryptocurrency that was number three on CoinMarketCap with millions of users to deploy it.”

This war of words between Cardano and Ethereum comes as ADA is outperforming ETH on the day, up +0.7% over the past 24 hours, compared to Ethereum’s +0.4% over the same timeframe.

It's not like I've been literally working on this topic for over 10 years of my life and launched a cryptocurrency that was number three on coinmarketcap with millions of users to deploy it. It's literally a crime in the Ethereum inner circles to mention Cardano. EUTXO is the… https://t.co/3F3l6cg0JE

— Charles Hoskinson (@IOHK_Charles) July 7, 2026

What the Ethereum Paper Actually Proposes The research document identifies a structural cost in Ethereum’s account model: every time a new address receives ETH or an ERC-20 token for the first time, it generates permanent state storage that accumulates indefinitely as the user base grows.

The paper proposes using native UTXOs specifically for simple payment transactions that do not require persistent account storage, projecting a roughly 99.8% reduction in permanent state for those payments.

The key mechanical distinction is that a UTXO is created once, spent once, and then removed. It leaves no residual footprint on the network’s state. Critically, the proposal does not replace Ethereum’s existing account model; smart contract activity would continue operating exactly as it does today.

This is a targeted patch for a specific scalability problem, not a wholesale architectural shift. The paper has not been formalized as an Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) and carries no confirmed implementation timeline.

Double top or Double bottom

Which one will play out for $ETH? pic.twitter.com/L3arwnGl3I

— Ted (@TedPillows) July 9, 2026

Hoskinson’s Prior Art Argument Hoskinson stated on X that he has spent over ten years developing Cardano’s eUTXO (Extended Unspent Transaction Output) model, which showcases a scalable proof of concept.

Unlike Bitcoin’s UTXO, Cardano’s design incorporates datums, redeemers, and script context, allowing smart contracts to function as deterministic local state machines without needing to access the global blockchain state.

This determinism is key, as a transaction’s validity relies solely on its inputs, leading to predictable fees and enhanced parallelism across UTXO sets, while minimizing front-running risks.

Hoskinson highlighted that Cardano achieved the third position on CoinMarketCap, with millions of users testing this model’s viability.

It’s important to note that the ten-year timeline pertains to research and design, while Cardano’s smart contract functionality, fully utilizing eUTXO, launched with the Alonzo upgrade in September 2021 and was developed through IOHK’s research pipeline.

(SOURCE: DefiLlama)

DISCOVER: Best Meme Coin ICOs to Invest in 2026

Cardano Community Reaction and the Convergence Argument Dori, a figure in the Cardano community, asserted that Ethereum’s permanent state growth creates structural weaknesses by increasing node storage costs and concentrating validation power.

He linked Ethereum’s account model to issues like MEV, reentrancy attacks, and limits on parallel transaction processing, suggesting that eUTXO design effectively addresses these problems.

From a neutral perspective, both Ethereum and Cardano tackle similar challenges of state locality and transaction processing, albeit through different approaches. Other projects, like Ergo and Nervos CKB, have also adopted UTXO-style models.

The debate over blockchain architecture focuses on trade-offs relevant to specific use cases. Meanwhile, Ethereum’s account model offers an advantage in synchronous DeFi composability, which is crucial for complex multi-step financial transactions.

EXCLUSIVE: Earn $10 USDC Via Binance Sign-Up

Leios and What Comes Next for Cardano $ADA Big rally the past week and the stand-out within the majors.

Usually coins like these moving does tend to be a decent sign for overall altcoin risk appetite, but I'd want to see a follow up leg to properly confirm this.

One leg up is generally met with a decent amount of… pic.twitter.com/0iUDYQF0Xt

— Daan Crypto Trades (@DaanCrypto) July 6, 2026

The debate lands at a moment when Cardano is pursuing its most significant throughput upgrade yet. Hoskinson has said the planned Leios upgrade could increase Cardano’s transaction throughput by up to 60 times, a level he argues would put the network’s processing speed on par with the XRP Ledger.

He also flagged that progress depends on governance approval from the Cardano community, introducing a procedural dependency that makes the timeline uncertain.

If Leios delivers on that projection, it would substantially close the performance gap that has historically been cited as a constraint on ADA-based DeFi adoption.

Whether Ethereum’s native UTXO research ever moves from paper to protocol, the conversation it has sparked is already doing work, forcing a precise comparison of two mature blockchain architecture philosophies that have been talking past each other for years.

EXPLORE: Best Crypto Presales With Asymmetric Upside in the Current Market

#Altcoin News Today

Why you can trust 99Bitcoins

10+ Years

Established in 2013, 99Bitcoin’s team members have been crypto experts since Bitcoin’s Early days.

90hr+

Weekly Research

100k+

Monthly readers

50+

Expert contributors

2000+

Crypto Projects Reviewed

Follow 99Bitcoins on your Google News Feed

Get the latest updates, trends, and insights delivered straight to your fingertips. Subscribe now!

Subscribe now

Alex Ioannou

On-Chain Journalist

Alex is a seasoned cryptocurrency trader and market analyst with over seven years of active experience in the digital asset space. Since entering the markets in 2017, Alex has specialized in identifying emerging "meta" trends and high-volatility narratives. Notably, Alex... Read More

Stellar’s native cryptocurrency, XLM, has seen a sudden and dramatic spike in trading volume over the past 24 hours. According to CoinMarketCap data, XLM’s trading volume shot up by 303 percent to reach $873 million in a single day. This surge stands out all the more given that XLM’s price actually declined during the same period, making the volume increase particularly noteworthy among investors and analysts.

A movement that defies the general marketWhile most major cryptocurrencies experienced sluggish trading activity, XLM moved in the opposite direction. Over the last 24 hours, Bitcoin’s trading volume dropped by 20 percent, Ethereum saw a 15 percent decrease, and Dogecoin volume slipped around 26 percent. Against this backdrop, Stellar’s explosive trading surge marked an unusual development and set it apart from broader market trends.

Stellar is widely recognized as an open source blockchain network designed for cross border payments and asset transfers. Although the root cause of this latest spike is yet to be precisely identified, some observers speculate that heightened investor interest may be linked to the rollout of Stellar’s third major protocol update of 2026.

CoinMarketCap’s statistics reveal that XLM trading volume hit $873 million within 24 hours, representing a 303 percent surge.

Protocol 27 launches on the mainnetStellar’s development team has officially activated the Protocol 27 upgrade—known within the community as “Zipper”—on the mainnet. This update introduces a series of new features, including delegated authentication authority for specialized accounts and address-linked smart contract credentials, setting new standards for security and flexibility on the network.

With delegated authentication authority, special accounts are now able to transfer their transaction approval rights to other addresses, particularly supporting smart contract-based accounts. The update adds two major new functions and a novel credential type to the system. Importantly, existing contracts and credential types remain valid, ensuring backward compatibility while expanding capabilities.

Glossary: Delegated authentication authority allows an account to assign its transaction approval rights to another address, following certain rules. Soroban is the smart contract platform for the Stellar network.

New credential format reduces transaction sizeThe upgrade’s new credential structure enables all signers and their associated signatures to be compiled within a single authorization record for delegated authority. This eliminates the need to create separate authorization entries for each signer, which in turn reduces the size of each transaction and streamlines the simulation process for network operations.

Protocol 27 also introduces address-linked Soroban address credentials, utilizing the same signature payload structure. These technical changes are expected to help streamline the management of complex account structures on Stellar, making the network more efficient even as capabilities grow.

Rising liquidity allows market participants to execute larger transactions with lower price impact, contributing to a healthier trading environment.

The sharp rise in trading volume signals renewed short term interest and participation in the XLM market. High liquidity particularly benefits investors by minimizing the price fluctuations of large trades, helping to enhance order execution conditions and foster a more resilient trading ecosystem.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

The layer-2 race is not only about speed and low fees anymore. It is also about how easily assets and messages can move between chains. Chainlink’s CCIP integration with zkSync Era lands directly in that part of the market.

For developers, interoperability is not a luxury feature. It can determine whether an application is trapped inside one ecosystem or able to connect to a wider pool of users and liquidity.

For more details, visit the official Chainlink platform.

TL;DR Chainlink integrated CCIP with zkSync Era.The move gives developers another route for cross-chain messaging and token transfers.It strengthens the idea that interoperability is becoming core infrastructure for layer-2 networks. Why zkSync Needs Interoperability zkSync Era already competes in a crowded Ethereum scaling landscape. To stand out, a layer-2 network needs more than cheaper transactions. It needs tools that let builders connect safely to other environments.

CCIP is Chainlink’s attempt to provide a standard cross-chain messaging layer. By bringing it to zkSync Era, the integration gives developers a more familiar route for building applications that need to communicate beyond one network.

The Chainlink Strategy Chainlink has spent years moving beyond price feeds. CCIP is part of that broader push to become infrastructure for secure cross-chain activity. Integrations like this help reinforce that positioning.

The challenge is that cross-chain infrastructure is judged on reliability. Bridges and messaging layers have been high-risk areas in crypto, so developer trust is not won by announcements alone. It has to be earned through performance.

What It Means For Builders For builders on zkSync, the new integration can make cross-chain applications easier to design. That could include liquidity movement, governance messaging, multi-chain DeFi, and token transfer systems.

The broader takeaway is that interoperability is becoming a central part of the layer-2 value proposition. The chains that make it easiest to build across ecosystems may have an edge.

The Reader Takeaway The useful way to read this story is not as a standalone headline about Chainlink, but as part of the wider pressure building around Chainlink coverage this week. Markets have been jumping quickly from one catalyst to the next, so the cleaner value for readers is in separating the actual development from the instant reaction around it. In this case, the source material gives us a concrete event to work from, rather than a loose rumour or a recycled social-media talking point.

That distinction matters because crypto readers are being asked to process a lot at once: ETF flows, regulatory actions, exchange listings, protocol upgrades, wallet movements, and political signals. A story like this is most useful when it helps them understand where CCIP fits into that broader map. It does not need to be inflated into a guaranteed price call to be worth covering. It simply needs to explain what changed, who is affected, and why the market is paying attention today.

The caveat is also important. Even clean source-backed developments can be overinterpreted when traders are hunting for a fast narrative. A listing does not automatically create lasting demand, a regulatory update does not immediately settle every legal question, and an on-chain movement does not always translate into a finished sale. The better read is to treat the development as a fresh data point and then watch whether follow-up activity confirms the direction of travel.

For NewsBTC readers, that means keeping the focus on what can actually be verified from the source and avoiding the temptation to turn every update into a sweeping market verdict. The story is strong enough on its own terms: it gives investors and traders another piece of context around Chainlink, while leaving room for the next filing, dashboard update, wallet movement, governance vote, or exchange notice to decide whether the angle grows into something bigger.

This report is based on information from Chainlink.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Ethena Labs just removed one of the biggest friction points in its synthetic dollar ecosystem. Onboarded mint users can now mint and redeem USDe using USDC at zero fees, eliminating the basis-point toll that previously ate into every conversion.

The change applies exclusively to whitelisted participants who have cleared KYC and KYB checks and signed Ethena’s Mint User Agreement. Everyone else still gets their USDe the old-fashioned way: through secondary markets, exchanges, or partner platforms like Morpho vaults.

What actually changed and why it matters Before this update, direct minting and redemption of USDe was already restricted to vetted counterparties, primarily market makers and institutional participants. But even those approved users were paying fees on the conversion. Now that cost drops to 0 bps.

Advertisement

Ethena has also indicated it will update fee schedules for transactions involving non-whitelisted assets, with the new rates visible on public dashboards. So while USDC conversions are now free, other collateral types may still carry costs.

USDe’s positioning in the stablecoin landscape USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar built on Ethereum, which means it maintains its peg not by holding dollars in a bank account but by combining crypto collateral with offsetting derivatives positions. The result is a token that tracks the dollar without directly depending on fiat reserves.

This makes it fundamentally different from USDC, which is backed 1:1 by cash and cash equivalents held by Circle.

Ethena’s integrations extend across both DeFi and CeFi. The protocol works with platforms including HTX for direct mint and redeem functionality, and Morpho for vault-based strategies.

What this means for investors and the broader market The restriction to KYC’d and KYB’d users is worth noting. Ethena is clearly threading the needle between DeFi accessibility and regulatory compliance. For institutions and compliant funds, this is a non-issue. For the permissionless-maximalist crowd, it’s another reminder that the biggest DeFi protocols are increasingly operating within traditional compliance frameworks.

A delta-neutral strategy is only as good as the funding rates it captures from derivatives markets. In periods of sustained negative funding, USDe’s value proposition gets tested in ways that free minting can’t solve. Investors eyeing this development should watch not just the fee structure, but the underlying health of the derivatives markets that keep USDe’s engine running.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Jul 9, 2026, 1:01 p.m.

2 min read

Stani Kulechov, Aave Labs (Olivier Acuna/CoinDesk)Summary

Aave Labs is launching Stable Vaults, a product that lets fintech apps offer yield on stablecoins like USDC, USDT and GHO without users directly interacting with crypto infrastructure.The vaults automatically allocate deposits across approved DeFi lending strategies, handling liquidity, capital allocation and yield distribution so companies can embed savings-like products through a single connection.Aave’s move positions it against rivals such as Morpho, whose vaults already power high-yield stablecoin products at Coinbase and Robinhood.Aave Labs, the organization behind the largest decentralized lending platform Aave AAVE$92.08, is rolling out vaults to help fintech companies offer yield on stablecoins without requiring users to interact directly with crypto rails.

The new Stable Vaults let wallets, exchanges and payment providers embed stablecoin earning through a single connection. Behind the scenes, the vaults allocate deposits across approved decentralized finance (DeFi) lending strategies while the customer continues using a familiar app interface.

"Stable Vaults make predictable stablecoin earning simple to plug into any fintech application," Aave founder Stani Kulechov said in a statement.

The move comes as stablecoins has become increasingly part of everyday payments and digital banking. As more fintech firms adopt stablecoins for moving money globally, many are looking for ways to let customers earn a return on idle balances without leaving blockchain rails or navigating crypto-native applications.

Vaults have emerged to fill that role. They are a piece of infrastructure that automatically move users' deposits between lending and yield strategies based on predefined rules, allowing investors to earn returns without actively managing positions or monitoring markets.

Rival crypto lender Morpho has become a key player in this fast-growing market. Coinbase, for example, started to offer in June a high-yield savings vault for USDC stablecoin deposits powered by Morpho and Ethena, and has already surpassed $200 million in assets. Recently, Robinhood also introduced similar product within its app for Global Dollar stablecoins with a vault by Morpho and Maple Finance.

With Stable Vaults, Aave aims to position itself as one of the infrastructure providers for this market. It's designed as open infrastructure, allowing companies to deploy their own vault and determine how it operates. The system manages liquidity, capital allocation and yield distribution automatically, allowing developers to offer savings-like products without building DeFi infrastructure themselves. It supports stablecoins including USDC, USDT and Aave's GHO.

Stable Vaults will also underpin Aave's upcoming savings app, currently in test mode.

Related Assets

12345678910

Coinbase is giving Filecoin traders a new way to take risk. By adding margin support for FIL, the exchange is not just listing another feature. It is expanding how one of crypto’s older infrastructure tokens can be traded on a major US-facing platform.

That matters because Filecoin has often sat in an awkward place. The project is tied to a real infrastructure thesis around decentralized storage, but the market frequently treats FIL as just another volatile altcoin. Margin access tends to sharpen that trading identity.

For more details, visit the official Coinbase platform.

TL;DR Coinbase is adding Filecoin margin trading support.The move gives traders more flexibility around FIL exposure.It also keeps decentralized storage assets in the conversation as exchanges expand margin markets. Why Margin Support Changes The Setup Margin trading can deepen liquidity and attract more active traders, but it also raises the stakes. When a token becomes available for leveraged positioning, price moves can become more sensitive to funding, liquidation risk, and short-term sentiment.

For Coinbase, the decision suggests there is enough demand around Filecoin to justify broader trading tools. For FIL, it offers more visibility at a time when infrastructure tokens are trying to reassert their relevance.

Filecoin’s Infrastructure Narrative The underlying Filecoin thesis is still about storage: decentralized data markets, long-term archival needs, and alternatives to centralized cloud infrastructure. That story has never been as simple or as viral as memecoins or AI tokens, but it remains one of the sector’s more concrete use cases.

The question is whether trading access can help pull attention back to that infrastructure angle or whether leverage simply turns FIL into a faster speculative instrument.

The Risk Traders Should Remember Margin support is not automatically bullish. It can attract long exposure, but it can also make shorting easier and increase liquidation-driven volatility. That means the listing is better read as a market-structure update than a directional guarantee.

Still, for an asset like Filecoin, broader access on Coinbase is meaningful. It keeps FIL in front of active traders while the decentralized storage story continues to develop in the background.

A Useful Way To Frame It The useful way to read this story is not as a standalone headline about Coinbase, but as part of the wider pressure building around Coinbase coverage this week. Markets have been jumping quickly from one catalyst to the next, so the cleaner value for readers is in separating the actual development from the instant reaction around it. In this case, the source material gives us a concrete event to work from, rather than a loose rumour or a recycled social-media talking point.

That distinction matters because crypto readers are being asked to process a lot at once: ETF flows, regulatory actions, exchange listings, protocol upgrades, wallet movements, and political signals. A story like this is most useful when it helps them understand where Filecoin fits into that broader map. It does not need to be inflated into a guaranteed price call to be worth covering. It simply needs to explain what changed, who is affected, and why the market is paying attention today.

The caveat is also important. Even clean source-backed developments can be overinterpreted when traders are hunting for a fast narrative. A listing does not automatically create lasting demand, a regulatory update does not immediately settle every legal question, and an on-chain movement does not always translate into a finished sale. The better read is to treat the development as a fresh data point and then watch whether follow-up activity confirms the direction of travel.

For NewsBTC readers, that means keeping the focus on what can actually be verified from the source and avoiding the temptation to turn every update into a sweeping market verdict. The story is strong enough on its own terms: it gives investors and traders another piece of context around Coinbase, while leaving room for the next filing, dashboard update, wallet movement, governance vote, or exchange notice to decide whether the angle grows into something bigger.

This article is based on information from Coinbase.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Stripe subsidiary Privy has partnered with Solana infrastructure firm Jito Labs on a new transaction certainty tool called FullSend, which will help ensure that transactions sent from Privy wallets are included in Solana blocks "as fast as the network allows," according to an announcement shared with The Block.

FullSend was co-developed by Privy and Jito, one of the most prominent Solana infrastructure firms, and has reportedly been running unannounced in production inside Privy since the beginning of the year. Since January, FullSend has achieved 99.999% landing reliability across millions of transactions.

"Transaction landing on Solana became more complicated than it ever needed to be — tips, priority fees, picking the right endpoint. We wanted to make that entire decision disappear for developers,” Privy CTO Asta Li said in the statement.

FullSend works by automatically routing every transaction signed in a Privy wallet directly to the current and upcoming Solana leaders through Jito’s low-latency network. Solana rotates block building leaders roughly every 400 milliseconds per slot, following a predetermined schedule based on stake.

In addition to helping ensure inclusion, the system also bypasses any Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) risks, like bots front-running, sandwiching, or censoring transactions.

According to the announcement, FullSend cuts Privy’s inclusion latency for transactions to 50 milliseconds, “putting transactions in front of leaders before the competition.” Traditionally, Solana wallets send transaction information to a public or hosted RPC node, which then broadcasts it to the network — a process that takes at least 200 ms.

"The best applications on Solana win or lose on how fast and reliably their transactions land — that's the whole game,” Jito Labs CEO Lucas Bruder said. “FullSend is our answer at the infrastructure layer: straight to the leader, standard priority fees, MEV protection by default.”

The announcement notes the solution is especially geared toward fintechs, market makers, and other institutional Solana users who need speed and certainty when transacting on a blockchain.

Earlier this year, Privy partnered with Alchemy on an institutional onboarding solution. Privy counts fintechs like Klarna, Ramp, and Deel as users, as well as Hyperliquid, and claims 140 million accounts that process billions of dollars in monthly volume.

Stripe, which is also co-developing the stablecoin-focused Layer 1 blockchain Tempo, acquired Privy in 2025 following its $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge.

Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

@OndoFinance has extended its 24/7 on-chain minting and redemption service for tokenized US equities to @Solana, completing a multi-chain rollout that began on Ethereum and BNB Chain in late June 2026. The move brings always-on liquidity to a growing suite of tokenized stocks and ETFs, allowing users anywhere in the world to settle positions outside traditional market hours.

What the Upgrade Actually Does Prior to this rollout, Ondo's platform already permitted around-the-clock transfers of tokenized securities, but minting and redemption, the creation and cancellation of positions, were still tied to US market hours. The Defiant reported that the upgrade removes that constraint, allowing eligible users to mint or redeem tokenized equities at any hour, including weekends and public holidays, at the prevailing market price.

The assets covered include $SPYon, $QQQon, $NVDAon, and $TSLAon, among others. Crypto Times noted that these are among the most actively traded tokenized names on the platform, with additional assets expected to be added in the weeks ahead.

The system is powered by Ondo's Nexus infrastructure, which handles on-demand, price-linked creation and redemption of tokens backed by real securities held at broker-dealers. Chainlink price feeds provide the real-time pricing data that makes continuous redemption technically viable.

Scale and Competitive Context Ondo Global Markets now lists more than 430 tokenized stocks and ETFs across Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain. The platform states it was the first in the tokenized-stock sector to surpass $1 billion in total value locked, exceeding the combined TVL of competing platforms. Beyond trading, tokenized stocks on the platform are also being used as collateral within DeFi applications including Ondo Perps, Morpho, and Euler.

@OndoFinance has also highlighted a distinction that separates this launch from rival offerings. Competitors claiming 24/7 trading have generally confined continuous access to secondary-market transfers on centralized and decentralized exchanges, while actual issuance and redemption remained restricted to market hours. Ondo's upgrade addresses that gap directly at the protocol level.

The Solana integration reflects the network's appeal for high-throughput, low-cost on-chain activity and continues Ondo's broader strategy of expanding institutional-grade tokenized assets across multiple chains.

Sources:
The Defiant: Ondo Finance 24/7 Minting and Redemption for Tokenized Stocks and ETFs
Crypto Times: Ondo Launches Industry-First 24/7 Tokenized Stock Minting
Crypto Briefing: ONDO Finance Enables 24/7 Minting and Redemption for Tokenized Stocks and ETFs

Token burns often act as a mechanism to help a token diverge from broader market FUD.

The logic is simple: Burning tokens permanently removes them from circulation by sending them to dead wallets, reducing the liquid supply available in the market.

If demand stays the same or increases, this lower supply can create scarcity, supporting price and helping the token outperform the broader market.

The Shiba Inu community appears to be testing this thesis in real time. As the chart below shows, more than 110 million SHIB were burned on the 8th of July, marking the biggest single-day burn in six months.

More importantly, weekly burns have now climbed to 152 million SHIB, suggesting the burn rate is accelerating despite broader memecoin weakness. 

Source: Shiburn However, the burns have yet to translate into any meaningful technical strength.  SHIB is down around 4.57% on the daily chart, continuing to diverge from the typical scarcity-driven narrative.

The reason becomes clearer when looking at Shiba Inu’s [SHIB] supply dynamics.

Since launch, the SHIB community has burned more than 410 trillion SHIB, yet roughly 585.6 trillion tokens still circulate in the market.

In other words, the recent increase in burn activity removes only a tiny fraction of the total supply, failing to materially tighten the circulating supply. Without a meaningful pickup in demand, reduced supply alone is unlikely to reverse SHIB’s broader downtrend.

From a market perspective, this shifts the focus back to the broader memecoin sector. If sector-wide liquidity continues to weaken, deflationary tokenomics alone may not be enough to trigger a sustained FOMO rally.

Instead, SHIB is likely to remain more sensitive to broader memecoin capital flows than its own burn rate.

SHIB burn activity surges as memecoin weakness deepens  The recent 110 million SHIB burn wasn’t an isolated event. 

Instead, it capped off a broader pickup in burn activity.

According to Shibburn data, the Shiba Inu community burned 152 million+ SHIB over the past week, lifting the weekly burn rate by 55.77%. Most of that increase came from the 110 million SHIB burned, marking the network’s biggest single-day burn in six months.

Even so, SHIB’s price continues to ignore the spike in burn activity.

The token is down 5%+ over the past week, showing that lower supply alone hasn’t been enough to shift market structure. The memecoin market tells the story.

During the Q4 2024 rally, memecoins made up more than 10% of the total altcoin market cap. At press time, that share has dropped to just 3.7%, showing that capital has continued to leave the sector.

Source: CryptoQuant From a supply-demand perspective, demand clearly remains the limiting factor. 

While token burns continue to reduce supply at the margin, the ongoing outflow of capital from memecoins has more than offset that effect. Until liquidity returns to the sector, demand (not deflationary tokenomics) is likely to remain the primary driver of SHIB’s price.

Final Summary SHIB burned 110 million tokens in its biggest burn in six months, but the price is still falling. Weak memecoin demand continues to outweigh SHIB’s token burns.