Track market-moving stories before they get noisy

THE STREET: Billionaire says Bitcoin's next 3-year bull run has already begun

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Cryptocurrency mining, the process of using computer hardware to verify transactions on a blockchain network, experienced a major surge in popularity between 2011 and 2018. During this period, cryptocurrency prices climbed to record highs, encouraging miners to invest in expensive hardware and infrastructure to mine digital assets and earn rewards.

Summary

SHRMiner offers cloud mining contracts, daily reward tracking, and cryptocurrency withdrawals. CGMiner provides open-source mining software but requires command-line knowledge. StormGain and MinerGate offer accessible tools for users without dedicated mining hardware. Zionodes lets users remotely manage mining equipment through a real-time dashboard. In recent years, however, the landscape has changed. Rising energy costs and the significant upfront investment required for mining have made it increasingly difficult for individual and small-scale miners to remain profitable.

If you want to use your spare time to earn Bitcoin with your smartphone, several apps offer convenient ways to participate in mining. That said, mobile mining typically generates relatively low returns and can put additional strain on your device. Here are some of the top apps to consider for Bitcoin mining in 2026.

1. SHRMiner — A Bitcoin mining app worth watching Founded in 2018, SHRMiner has grown into one of the leading cloud mining service providers, allowing users to rent computing power from professional ASIC mining hardware to participate in Bitcoin mining. The company focuses on ease of use, security, and transparency.

Key features and benefits Easy to use and accessible: SHRMiner provides a straightforward dashboard, simple contract selection, daily reward tracking, and withdrawal monitoring, making it easy for users to manage their mining activities.

Flexible contract options: The platform offers different plans and contract levels designed to accommodate both beginners and experienced users, with flexible options based on investment amount and contract duration.

Security and transparency: The platform states that it uses cold wallets, encryption, and real-time monitoring to help protect user funds and mining operations.

Reputation and reviews: SHRMiner has been featured in cryptocurrency media coverage and press releases, where it has been presented as a reliable option for users interested in cryptocurrency mining.

How to get started with SHRMiner Getting started with SHRMiner is simple and straightforward:

Create a free account — Visit the official SHRMiner platform and create a free account using your email address. New users can currently receive a $15 bonus, along with a $0.60 daily mining reward. [Click here to register instantly.]

Choose a mining contract — Select a short-term or long-term plan based on your budget and expected returns.

Fund your account — Deposit funds into your account and purchase a mining contract to participate in Bitcoin mining.

Start earning — Once the contract is activated, mining rewards will begin automatically.

Withdraw anytime — SHRMiner supports flexible daily withdrawals to your cryptocurrency wallet.

With an intuitive interface and convenient mining experience, SHRMiner has become one of the platforms worth watching in the 2026 cloud mining market. Users can simply register, log in, select a plan, and begin participating in mining.

2. CGMiner CGMiner is a popular Bitcoin mining application that also supports mining other cryptocurrencies, including Litecoin and Dogecoin. Launched in 2011, CGMiner is known for its versatility and open-source design, making it a popular choice for users looking to scale their mining operations.

However, CGMiner uses a command-line interface, which means it has a steeper learning curve than many other mining applications. Users control the mining software through keyboard commands, so having a comfortable and ergonomic computer keyboard can make extended use more convenient.

CGMiner is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, Mac, and Windows, giving it a broad user base. If you’re comparing it with platforms such as RollerCoin, the latter may be a more accessible option for beginners.

3. StormGain StormGain is a user-friendly Bitcoin mining application that provides a convenient dashboard for monitoring asset prices and market movements. The platform also includes charting tools that allow users to track trends and price changes.

With StormGain, users can participate in digital currency mining without investing in expensive mining hardware. The service offers native applications for Android and iOS, as well as a web-based version, making it accessible across different devices.

Whether you’re new to cryptocurrency or already have mining experience, StormGain provides a convenient way to participate in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency-related activities.

4. MinerGate Founded in 2014, MinerGate is an open mining pool designed to improve mining efficiency while helping reduce associated costs. Its user interface and overall experience have received attention for providing a relatively straightforward mining environment.

The software is designed to be easy to install and allows users to quickly get started with cryptocurrency mining. MinerGate also provides tools for managing and monitoring cryptocurrency mining activities.

One of MinerGate’s notable features is its ability to use both CPU and GPU resources to mine multiple cryptocurrencies. This provides users with a more flexible and comprehensive approach to cryptocurrency mining.

Overall, MinerGate offers a user-friendly mining solution that can appeal to both beginners and more experienced cryptocurrency users.

5. Zionodes Zionodes is one of the more user-friendly Bitcoin mining platforms available today. After registering an account, users can get started with mining operations relatively quickly. One of its most useful features is a dynamic dashboard that allows users to monitor earnings and mining activity in real time.

Zionodes uses a remote mining model, meaning users can own their own mining hardware while managing how it is used remotely. This gives customers greater control and ownership over their mining operations compared with traditional cloud mining service models.

With an easy-to-use interface and an emphasis on transparency, Zionodes has positioned itself as one of the more accessible and user-friendly options for Bitcoin mining.

Final thoughts Overall, these five Bitcoin mining apps and platforms offer different ways to participate in the cryptocurrency mining market in 2026. From SHRMiner’s cloud mining model and MinerGate’s flexible mining options to Zionodes’ remote mining approach, each platform offers a different experience for cryptocurrency users.

Whether you’re a beginner exploring Bitcoin mining for the first time or an experienced miner looking for a more convenient option, these platforms can provide accessible ways to participate without having to build and operate a traditional mining setup yourself.

For cryptocurrency enthusiasts looking to make use of their spare time and explore alternative ways to earn Bitcoin, these apps and platforms are worth considering in 2026.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Strategy Inc. is not selling its Bitcoin. At least not while the market is running hot, according to CEO Phong Le, who made his position clear in early September 2026: the company does not plan to offload any of its holdings during what he described as an incoming heavy bull market.

That’s a confident statement from the man running a company that now holds 845,050 BTC, worth roughly $65 billion. To put that in perspective, Strategy controls more than 4% of the entire Bitcoin supply that will ever exist.

The numbers behind the conviction Strategy’s latest Bitcoin purchase was 4,603 BTC acquired at an average price of $80,318 per coin, resuming accumulation after an approximate ten-week pause.

That pause wasn’t a loss of faith. The company used the break to clean up its balance sheet, pay down debt to reach a zero net debt position, and build a cash cushion of roughly $7 billion.

Advertisement

During that same period, Strategy sold approximately 7,000 BTC, at prices between $60,000 and $65,000 per coin, primarily to cover preferred dividend obligations. Le framed those sales as a capital cost decision, not a referendum on Bitcoin’s value.

From ‘never sell’ to ‘sell only when it makes sense’ Strategy built its reputation on an almost religious commitment to never selling Bitcoin. But the reality of running a public company with preferred shareholders and debt obligations meant the dogma needed a practical update. Le’s framing in September 2026 reflects that evolution.

Le described the approach as a two-way strategy: accumulate when conditions favor it, and sell only under strictly defined circumstances tied to capital costs rather than price sentiment. The emphasis, he stressed, is on growing Bitcoin per share over time, a metric that treats the company’s stock as a proxy for Bitcoin exposure, adjusted for dilution and capital efficiency.

What this signals for institutional Bitcoin holders Le’s comments suggest the company is thinking several moves ahead. By establishing that future sales are possible but rule-bound, Strategy creates a framework other institutional holders can study and adapt.

For market participants watching Strategy’s every filing, Le’s September remarks also carry a forward signal. He does not expect to sell during the bull market, implying he sees the bull market as real, ongoing, and substantial enough to justify holding rather than trimming.

Strategy’s Bitcoin-per-share metric is also worth watching as a benchmark. If that number grows consistently over time, it becomes harder for critics to argue the company’s approach is destroying shareholder value.

The company holding over 4% of the total Bitcoin supply means its decisions ripple outward. A surprise sale at scale would move markets. Strategy’s behavior is no longer just a corporate finance story. It shapes how the broader market reads institutional conviction in Bitcoin.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

In brief Bitcoin is consolidating near $77,500 after spiking from roughly $64,420 to nearly $80,700 in six trading days last week, the move traders are calling a "Bart Simpson" setup. The four-hour chart's own indicators show a stalling market, not the violent breakdown a completed Bart Simpson pattern requires. Analysts have flagged $75,800 as the level that would confirm the bearish setup; a slower, weeks-long slide toward $62,000 along a descending trendline is the more realistic alternative to an actual flash crash. Bitcoin gained close to 25% in August, ripping from about $64,420 on August 19 to nearly $80,700 by August 25. It has spent the week since grinding sideways and fading, last trading around $77,470.

That shape—sharp spike, flat top, partial giveback—is why crypto traders keep typing the words "Bart Simpson" into their group chats.

The Bart Simpson pattern is a chart-formation nickname, not a technical indicator. It describes a sharp move in one direction, a period of tight sideways chop, then a snap back toward where the move started—resembling the cartoon character's spiked hair. It has circulated in crypto trading circles since 2015 and tends to resurface every time Bitcoin pulls off a fast, narrow-range rally like August's.

What the 4-hour chart actually shows

The Bart pattern would imply Bitcoin is in store for a flash crash, but Bitcoin's four-hour chart reads mixed, not alarming signals. The Relative Strength Index, or RSI, measures how overbought or oversold an asset is on a 0-100 scale, and for BTC it currently sits at 44.8—leaning bearish but nowhere near the sub-30 oversold territory that typically accompanies a real breakdown.

The Average Directional Index, or ADX, gauges how strong a trend is regardless of direction, and that’s at 22, below the 25 threshold traders use to confirm a market is actually trending in either direction.

Bitcoin price data. Image: TradingviewThe most alarming data point is the Squeeze Momentum indicator, which flags when volatility is compressing before an eventual breakout. For Bitcoin, that’s currently signaling bearish, and with momentum falling. Right now it is showing a compression zone, meaning there may be a big movement ahead. If the jump is bearish, the Bart Simpson would happen, and if it’s to the upside, the bullish trend is confirmed.

The 50-period exponential moving average is still above the 200-period moving average, the textbook definition of a bullish trend structure, even as short-term momentum cools. This setup usually means a Bart Simpson is unlikely, because prices are bullish on average.

Myriad: Bitcoin price next move? Click to make your prediction.None of these readings individually scream imminent crash, which is part of why analysts are split on whether the Bart Simpson pattern actually completely forms this time.

What a real flash crash would require

A completed Bart Simpson needs the reversal to happen roughly as fast as the spike did—that's the entire premise of the pattern.

Applied to Bitcoin's current setup, a genuine flash-crash version would mean price giving back the whole August rally in a matter of hours, not weeks, snapping back down toward the $64,000 zone it launched from. That's close to a 17% single move, on par with the scale of the rally itself.

Bitcoin price data. Image: TradingviewGetting there isn't a matter of drifting lower. It requires a specific trigger: a break below $75,800. Holding above it would tend to invalidate the bearish setup instead.

A flash crash also needs a catalyst violent enough to force it: cascading leveraged liquidations, not a routine pullback. Bitcoin has produced exactly that kind of event before, including the $19 billion liquidation wipeout triggered by an October 2025 Trump tariff threat, so the mechanism exists. It just hasn't shown up yet in this week's four-hour indicators, which is why the pattern remains a possibility traders are debating rather than something already confirmed.

Why September is amplifying the chatter

The Bart Simpson talk is landing during Bitcoin's historically weakest month. Bitcoin has closed eight of the last 13 Septembers in the red since 2013, averaging a 2.97% loss. This is the worst average and median of any month on the calendar. Traders have nicknamed it "Red September," and this year it's colliding with a live Federal Reserve decision.

The CME FedWatch tool currently prices a 64% chance the Fed hikes rates at its September 15-16 meeting. That’s typically bearish for risk assets, including crypto, because as lending gets more expensive, investors look for safe assets like gold/bonds to hedge against losses. Spot Bitcoin ETFs shed roughly $236 million on Tuesday alone, and oil has climbed into the low $90s a barrel after fresh U.S.-Iran strikes near the Strait of Hormuz, adding inflation pressure to the case for a hike.

None of that guarantees a crash on its own, but they are worth considering before opening trades. A rate-driven risk-off move and a Bart Simpson flash crash are two different mechanisms that happen to point in the same direction right now.

The other scenario: A correction that isn't a flash crash

There's a second bearish path that looks nothing like Bart Simpson. Drawing a descending trendline from the roughly $80,626 August high based on supports, the current indicators and natural expectations produces a gradual downward channel that reaches the $62,000 area over about eight weeks, into late October, rather than in a single violent leg

Bitcoin price data. Image: TradingviewThat's a similar percentage decline to the flash-crash scenario, but stretched across a seasonally weak September and a historically volatile October instead of compressed into hours.

This is also the pattern Bitcoin has actually drawn before. Decrypt reported in March that Bitcoin's price action was tracing a compressive wedge—a series of lower highs against a descending resistance line—that preceded crashes in October 2025 and January 2026. Both of those were grinding structural breakdowns, not one-candle flash crashes. A slow bleed with lower highs and lower lows is still bearish, but it's mechanically a correction, not a Bart Simpson.

The distinction matters for anyone trying to trade around the meme. A flash crash needs a forced-liquidation event and a fast break of $75,800 to complete the pattern's shape. A drawn-out correction just needs September's seasonal drag, a Fed hike, and time.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Investors withdrew $43.7 million from Fidelity’s spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund [ETF] on 1 September, adding to a wider reversal that was seen across the US market.

The Fidelity Bitcoin outflow was notable, but it was not the largest that was seen on the day, BlackRock’s fund accounted for most of the $236.5 million that left spot Bitcoin ETFs during the session.

Fidelity Bitcoin fund records first September outflow Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund [FBTC] started September with $43.7 million in net withdrawals, according to Farside Investors data.

What the data showed was that more money was withdrawn from the fund than invested during that session, but this does not mean Fidelity itself sold Bitcoin because it had turned against the asset. ETF flows reflect decisions made by investors who buy and sell shares in the fund.

The latest withdrawal also followed an up-and-down end to August. FBTC attracted $6.9 million on August 31 after recording an $83.6 million outflow on August 27.

But despite the withdrawals observed, the overall flow remains positive, with FBTC having seen about $10.21 billion in net inflows overall.

BlackRock drove most of the ETF decline BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust [IBIT] recorded a much larger $201.2 million outflow on September 1. Bitwise’s BITB was the only fund to finish the session with an inflow, adding $8.4 million.

The remaining funds reported no net movement.

The negative session came one day after spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively saw an inflow of $216.7 million. On both days, the funds recorded a relatively modest net withdrawal of about $19.8 million.

On 1 Sep weak demand is apparent but only on one trading day, which does not imply that institutions are leaving.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs have witnessed nearly $54.68 billion in net inflows after the products have been launched. But whether the latest ETF withdrawal can trigger a longer trend of liquidation would depend on how the funds fare for the next few days.

Final Summary Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETF recorded a $43.7 million outflow, while BlackRock led withdrawals with $201.2 million. This has brought total outflows for yesterday to $236.5 million, reducing most of the positive figures in the previous session when it saw inflows total $216.7 million.

Nate Geraci, an influential figure in the ETF analysis space, highlighted a shift in Washington’s cryptocurrency debate this week. The central issue for policymakers, he noted, has moved beyond whether digital assets will enter the financial mainstream, focusing instead on how their integration will be structured. For XRP, the digital asset developed by Ripple Labs for global payments, these regulatory nuances are especially significant due to its complex legal journey in the United States.

Debate shifts toward system architectureEchoing Kristin Smith, President of the Solana Policy Institute, Geraci explained that current regulatory discussions now revolve around constructing the architecture for crypto’s potential coexistence or integration with established financial systems. This shift comes as the CLARITY Act nears a decisive Senate procedural vote on Sept. 15, while federal bodies continue updating crypto rules even before formal legislative decisions are made.

This two-track strategy stands out for XRP because of its unique progression through the U.S. regulatory landscape compared to many other digital assets.

Geraci summarized: Policymakers are no longer fixated on whether crypto should become a part of traditional finance. Attention is now on the framework that will govern its role in the system.

Impact of court decisions and legislative provisionsRipple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission put an end to their respective appeals in August 2025, establishing the district court’s final judgment as authoritative. District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP did not constitute unregistered securities transactions, although certain institutional sales did fall under existing securities law.

A crucial discussion point for XRP is the proposed Section 105 in the Senate’s draft legislation. If adopted, this provision would restrict the SEC’s jurisdiction when a non-appealable U.S. court judgment, pre-dating the law, determines a digital asset is not a security.

However, legal analysts caution that the impact of this clause has limits. Judge Torres’s findings applied specifically to certain types of XRP transactions, rather than issuing a blanket determination for all sales of the token. As a result, debates about the security status of XRP continue and remain closely tied to the specific circumstances of each transaction.

This uncertainty keeps the institutional infrastructure question at the forefront of the discussion regarding XRP’s place in regulated markets.

SEC proposals and technological integrationOn Sept. 1, the SEC introduced its first significant update in decades to transfer-agent regulations, specifically acknowledging the role of blockchain technology in securities offerings and share transfers. Transfer agents manage crucial elements of U.S. securities settlement and ownership, positioning them at the center of market operations.

Coinpaper analyzed the intersection of these proposed blockchain-focused transfer-agent rules with both Ripple and the XRP Ledger’s expanding tokenization infrastructure.

For Ripple and the XRP Ledger, these developments align with ongoing efforts to expand into tokenization, institutional custody, stablecoin strategies, and broader financial infrastructure. XRP-linked investment vehicles, such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), are also becoming more common within regulated finance circles.

Mini dictionary: Transfer agents, in finance, are responsible for maintaining records of investors and facilitating securities transfers, settlements, and ownership changes for corporations and funds.

EventDateXRP ImpactProgrammatic sales not securitiesDistrict Court, 2025FavorableSEC transfer-agent rule proposalSept. 1, 2025Expands blockchain recognitionXRP price movementSept. 3, 2025$1.32 (down 2%)XRP market response and outlookRipple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has maintained that passing the CLARITY Act could eliminate a significant regulatory obstacle for the XRP ecosystem, paving the way for broader adoption by institutional investors and financial platforms.

Despite these policy developments, the immediate effect on XRP’s market value has been limited. XRP traded at approximately $1.32 on Wednesday, representing a decline of nearly 2% on the day and about 9% from its August 27 level of $1.45.

While policy shifts promise long-term clarity, current market sentiment suggests that traders and investors do not view them as immediate drivers for XRP price action.

Industry participants see Washington’s focus evolving from existential questions of whether crypto belongs in traditional finance, to the logistical challenges of shaping its regulated participation. For XRP, the main regulatory milestone ahead centers on solidifying the structures through which it can function within established U.S. markets, rather than debating its eligibility for access.

XRP year-end forecasts diverge: 7,420% surge or 26% drop, analyst says

XRP is starting September amid growing speculation regarding its price direction, with a number of factors likely to impact its performance ahead of the month’s close. Analysts are paying close attention to institutional demand, policy developments in the United States, and monetary shifts, as well as trends across the wider digital asset landscape.

ChatGPT’s XRP outlook for September 2026OpenAI’s artificial intelligence platform, ChatGPT, recently evaluated current catalysts and outlined a potential price range for XRP by September 30, 2026. The analysis notes that precise forecasting is impossible, but draws on technical indicators, institutional activity, macroeconomic signals, and regulatory dynamics to set expectations for different scenarios.

ChatGPT finds that incorporating technical patterns, institutional flows, macroeconomic conditions, and pending regulatory changes results in multiple possible outcomes, not a single definitive price for XRP.

Under its base-case scenario, ChatGPT places XRP’s price between $1.30 and $1.60 by the end of September 2026. The study emphasizes that stronger momentum in the crypto market and improved external conditions could send XRP above this range. In a bullish case, the price could reach between $1.70 and $2.20 or higher, particularly if XRP overcomes resistance around $1.56 to $1.69 and if flows into institutional products increase.

In contrast, a breakdown of support could push the price to between $0.80 and $1.15, especially in the event of significant market headwinds or stricter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve.

ScenarioSupport/ResistanceXRP Price RangeKey FactorsBullishAbove $1.56–$1.69$1.70–$2.20+Strong ETF demand, positive regulationBase CaseAround moving averages$1.30–$1.60Stable ETF flows, moderate growthBearishBelow $1.34–$1.36$0.80–$1.15Market decline, hawkish policyInstitutional demand and ETF inflowsInstitutional demand has been a recurring theme in XRP’s recent story. Spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for XRP have recorded persistent inflows, with total assets surpassing $1.4 billion. Ongoing participation through these funds may support the price, provided that overall digital asset markets remain steady.

Sustained ETF inflows often reflect confidence from professional investors and can help maintain market liquidity and sentiment. Any acceleration in these inflows during September could reinforce bullish potential for XRP, but market-wide conditions and investor appetite will remain key drivers.

Regulatory clarity and the CLARITY ActRegulation is at the forefront of market discussions this month. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, also known as the CLARITY Act, is under watch by investors and project leaders as US lawmakers debate more definitive guidelines for digital assets like XRP.

Progress on the legislation could help reduce uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrencies and encourage broader institutional adoption. If the bill advances, this could further boost sentiment for XRP. Conversely, continued delays or negative changes may dampen the catalyst’s impact, making the law’s development an important factor in short-term price movements.

Mini dictionary: CLARITY Act, a proposed US legislative bill aiming to clarify regulatory definitions and requirements for digital assets, which could significantly affect compliance obligations and market dynamics within the crypto industry.

Key outcomes for XRP in SeptemberXRP’s trajectory in September depends on several interconnected factors. The bullish outcome requires the price to move above the $1.56–$1.69 resistance area, supported by heavy ETF inflows, positive regulatory advances, and a favorable macro environment.

The base-case scenario assumes steady ETF demand and market stability, with XRP trading between $1.30 and $1.60 while consolidating around key moving averages. A bearish outcome might emerge if support at $1.34–$1.36 is lost, potentially due to tighter US monetary policy or a broad selloff in digital assets, leading to prices slumping to between $0.80 and $1.15.

ChatGPT maintains that while XRP could reach higher or lower ranges, any forecast must account for the inherent uncertainty and volatility of the cryptocurrency market, along with evolving regulatory and macroeconomic factors.

Crypto analyst Dark Defender has identified a significant shift in $XRP’s technical outlook, highlighting that August’s monthly close could mark the beginning of a major new upward move. By sharing a monthly chart, the analyst pointed out that the digital asset completed its correction phase and has now started to show early signs of a bullish reversal.

Consolidation period endsAfter reaching a peak at $3.65 during the 2024-2025 rally, XRP entered a lengthy consolidation phase. The price gradually declined, moving within a descending channel and forming what chart technicians term an A-B-C corrective pattern. Wave C found its low point near $1, pushing the token into a zone seen as critical support by traders.

This trend continued until August, when XRP registered a notable reversal. In just under 72 hours during the latter part of the month, the token surged over 50%. Price action managed to decisively break above its initial resistance level, and the monthly chart closed well above this threshold. Many traders now regard this monthly close as a potential launchpad for future gains.

August closed with a green bullish candle. $XRP is breaking the initial resistance. These are the signals of a new impulse! Resistances: $1.88, $4.11, $5.85. Targets: $7.07 and a double-digit range.

Technical developments on the chartThe latest chart analysis reveals that the A-B-C correction has completed, with the lowest point aligning with the bottom of the Ichimoku cloud and coinciding with a support zone. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is beginning to rise from its recent lows and is now poised to cross above its signal line, a development often viewed by technical traders as an indicator of a trend reversal ahead.

Dark Defender’s projection suggests the start of a new impulse phase. Fibonacci extension levels serve as the analyst’s main targets, with immediate price resistance seen at $1.88, followed by more ambitious levels at $4.11 and $7.07. While the precise “D.D.” target was not specified, it was described as falling into double digits. This aligns with similar predictions by other market participants, who have suggested longer-term goals ranging between $15 and $50.

Mini dictionary: Ichimoku cloud, a technical analysis indicator that identifies support, resistance, trend direction, and momentum through various averages plotted on a price chart.

Resistance and price targetsAccording to Dark Defender’s latest update, the three nearest resistance levels for XRP are $1.88, $4.11, and $5.85. The analyst’s primary target is now $7.07, while the ultimate objective remains within the double-digit price band. XRP’s current price stands at $1.3825, situated between the 50% retracement level of $1.2939 and the 85.4% retracement level at $1.5692. Clearing the $1.88 resistance is considered vital for confirming the validity of the bullish setup.

Resistance LevelRetracement/Extension$1.88161.8% extension$4.11261.8% extension$5.85Interim resistance$7.07361.8% extension / major targetAnalyst’s message to holdersIn a message aimed at long-term supporters, Dark Defender encouraged the community by acknowledging their perseverance throughout XRP’s periods of difficulty. The chart now highlights the asset’s breakout above initial resistance, and if the predicted impulse wave materializes, the first major destination would be $7.07, followed by the much-anticipated double-digit target.

“You have survived every difficulty; don’t forget how much you’ve made it through.” The projection now points to $7.07 as the next landmark, with the possibility of double-digit values on the horizon.

XRP Ledger trading activity grew significantly in the second quarter. The average daily order-book volume rose 79% from a year earlier even as the number of accounts executing those trades declined, according to a new report from XRP-focused digital asset treasury company Evernorth.

Order-book trading on the XRP Ledger averaged 3.57 million XRP per day in the three months through June. It is up from the year-earlier period. 

At the same time, the number of accounts placing trades each day fell to 1,111 from 1,864.

HOT Stories

That meant substantially more XRP was traded per active account. Average daily trading per account rose to 3,217 XRP from 1,072 XRP a year earlier, according to Evernorth's Q2 2026 XRP Liquidity Report.

Order-book activity also accounted for 81% of on-chain trading during the quarter, compared with 54% a year earlier.

The report's findings come as liquidity on the XRP Ledger continues to develop beyond XRP itself. 

Evernorth said the average supply of RLUSD, Ripple's dollar-pegged stablecoin, on the ledger reached $539 million in the second quarter, up from $73 million a year earlier.

You Might Also Like

RLUSD's share of its total supply held on the XRP Ledger also increased to 34% from 20% over the same period. Evernorth noted that the growth occurred while the broader stablecoin market contracted for the first time since 2023.

The data provides a snapshot of how trading and stablecoin liquidity on the XRP Ledger have changed over the past year. However, it does not by itself establish whether the increase in trade size.

Evernorth's public debut Evernorth is preparing to become a publicly traded digital asset treasury company through a proposed combination with Armada Acquisition Corp. II. The companies said last month that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had declared their Form S-4 registration statement effective.

Armada shareholders are scheduled to vote on the transaction Sept. 30. If approved and completed, the combined company is expected to trade on Nasdaq under the ticker XRPN.

The CLARITY Act has drawn public backing from leading financial institutions, signaling strong support from major players in the industry. Despite this momentum, the legislation continues to face opposition from certain quarters. Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, the largest US-based cryptocurrency exchange, addressed both the support and resistance in a recent interview.

Major institutions endorse the billArmstrong named Goldman Sachs, Citi, BNY Mellon, Fidelity, and BlackRock as key supporters of the CLARITY Act, stating these financial giants have openly endorsed the legislation. He described the bill as a positive development for banks that want to leverage blockchain technology to expand their services.

According to Armstrong, the majority of banks recognize the potential benefits the bill offers. He suggested that these institutions see new opportunities for business growth and innovation with the regulatory clarity the Act would provide for digital assets and blockchain integration.

Most banks support the bill because it gives them new tools to grow their business using blockchain, Armstrong said, but a small group still opposes it as they “don’t want competition from crypto companies.”

A minority pushes backArmstrong emphasized that opposition comes from a minority of banks intent on protecting their current market position rather than consumer interests or concerns about systemic stability. He explained that these banks prefer to avoid direct competition with digital asset firms and resist potential changes that could require them to offer higher rates to customers.

He referenced companies such as Ripple, a blockchain-based payments provider, which have encountered resistance from some banks when seeking a banking charter. Armstrong argued that this resistance centers on a desire to exclude competition rather than genuine regulatory or financial concerns.

Armstrong invoked the principles of free market competition, stating that such behavior should be evaluated accordingly. He predicted that the Senate would not support efforts to shield traditional banks from competition with crypto firms.

Armstrong expressed confidence that the Senate will not allow protectionism to block innovation, pointing to America’s tradition of encouraging competition.

Legislative progress and upcoming voteThe CLARITY Act passed the Senate Banking Committee in May and has since been awaiting a full Senate vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed for cloture prior to the August recess, setting the stage for a procedural vote scheduled for September 15, when the Senate reconvenes.

To pass the cloture threshold, the bill requires at least 60 votes, making bipartisan support essential. Senator Tim Scott has publicly stated that he expects the Act to become law. Senator Cynthia Lummis has also highlighted support for the legislation from major Wall Street firms, countering claims of widespread opposition from the financial sector.

The outcome of the September 15 vote will determine whether the Senate moves the bill forward, potentially opening the doors for broader adoption of blockchain technology in the US banking system.

Mini dictionary: CLARITY Act, US legislation aiming to provide clear regulations for digital assets, facilitate blockchain integration by banks, and reduce legal uncertainty for both traditional and crypto businesses by defining regulatory guidelines for the industry.

Armstrong reiterated that the opposition represents a minority within the banking industry. He made it clear that most major financial institutions have already expressed support for regulatory clarity and technological advancement.

InstitutionPosition on CLARITY ActGoldman SachsSupportsCitiSupportsBNY MellonSupportsFidelitySupportsBlackRockSupportsCertain other banksOpposeMarket observers await the critical Senate vote as a key turning point for the future regulatory environment affecting both traditional banks and cryptocurrency companies.

XRP Ledger saw a sharp increase in trading activity during the second quarter of 2026, according to a new report from Evernorth, a company specializing in digital asset treasury solutions for the XRP ecosystem. The average daily order-book trading volume on the ledger reached 3.57 million XRP, reflecting a 79% rise compared to the same period last year.

Fewer traders, larger trade sizesDespite the heightened trading volumes, the number of accounts placing trades on the XRP Ledger dropped to 1,111 per day from 1,864 a year ago. This resulted in a significant increase in average trading size per account, with each active account now handling an average of 3,217 XRP daily, up from 1,072 XRP one year earlier.

Order-book activity accounted for 81% of on-chain trading during the quarter, compared with 54% a year earlier, underscoring a shift toward more centralized trading activity on public order-books.

Order-book trading represented a larger share of on-chain activity, jumping from 54% to 81% over the year. This shift illustrates a move toward more order-driven trading on the XRP Ledger.

Rise of Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSDRipple’s dollar-linked stablecoin, RLUSD, also gained prominence on the XRP Ledger over the past year. Evernorth reported that the average supply of RLUSD on the ledger increased to $539 million during the second quarter, a notable rise from $73 million the previous year. At the same time, RLUSD’s share of its total supply held on the XRP Ledger grew from 20% to 34%.

Mini dictionary: RLUSD is Ripple’s U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin issued on the XRP Ledger. Stablecoins like RLUSD are designed to maintain a 1:1 value with the U.S. dollar and are used for fast, low-cost transactions on blockchain networks.

The expansion of RLUSD on the ledger occurred as the broader stablecoin market saw contraction for the first time since 2023.

MetricQ2 2025Q2 2026Avg. daily order-book volume (XRP)Not specified3.57 millionNumber of daily trading accounts1,8641,111Avg. daily volume per account (XRP)1,0723,217Order-book share of on-chain activity54%81%RLUSD supply on ledger$73 million$539 millionRLUSD supply share on ledger20%34%Evernorth’s public listing plansEvernorth is advancing plans to become a publicly listed digital asset treasury company through a proposed merger with Armada Acquisition Corp. II, a U.S.-based special purpose acquisition company. Last month, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission declared the companies’ Form S-4 registration statement effective—a key regulatory step for the transaction.

Armada shareholders are expected to vote on the proposed combination on September 30. If the deal is approved and completed, the merged company would be listed on Nasdaq under the ticker symbol XRPN.

The report provides insight into the ongoing evolution of liquidity and stablecoin activity on the XRP Ledger as well as corporate developments around Evernorth. However, while trading volumes per account are up, the data does not clarify the underlying market behavior driving these patterns.

Ethereum Price Prediction: Will ETH Drop to $2K Next if Buyers Fail to Regain Control Soon?

Summary

The global NFT market is projected to reach $60.82 billion in 2026, up from $43.08 billion in 2025, with gaming NFTs capturing 38% of total transaction volume. An NFT is a cryptographic token on a blockchain that proves ownership of a unique digital or physical asset, most commonly built on the ERC-721 or ERC-1155 standards on Ethereum. Real utility has overtaken speculation as the primary growth driver, with tokenized real world assets, event tickets, in-game items, and digital identity credentials all relying on NFT infrastructure. Environmental objections have largely been resolved since Ethereum moved to proof of stake in September 2022, cutting the network energy use by 99.99% according to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Legal frameworks remain fragmented, though the Yuga Labs v. Ripps circuit ruling confirmed that an NFT qualifies as goods under the Lanham Act, setting an early precedent for trademark enforcement in digital assets. The narrative that NFTs died sometime in 2023 makes for a clean headline, but it confuses a price correction in speculative art collectibles with the technology itself. Monthly trading volumes bottomed out in mid-2023 and then climbed back steadily. By October 2025, NFT trading volume hit $546 million in a single month with 10.1 million individual sales, an annual high. The collapse was real for profile-picture speculation, yet the underlying standard, a way to record verifiable ownership of a unique asset on a public ledger, never stopped working.

What changed is who uses NFTs and why. The buyer paying six figures for a cartoon ape grabbed attention in 2021. The concert venue issuing 40,000 tickets as tokens in 2026 does not make the same splash, but the second example moves more volume, solves a real problem, and does not depend on floor-price hype. Understanding what an NFT actually is, how the technology works, and where it applies today matters more now than it did during the speculative peak.

How NFTs work under the hood A non-fungible token is a unit of data stored on a blockchain that certifies a digital or physical asset as unique and not interchangeable. The word “fungible” means mutually replaceable. One bitcoin is identical to any other bitcoin, making it fungible. An NFT, by definition, is not. Each token carries a distinct identifier that separates it from every other token on the same contract.

On Ethereum, the two dominant standards are ERC-721 and ERC-1155. ERC-721, introduced in January 2018, assigns a single unique ID to each token. Every CryptoPunk, every Bored Ape, and every one-of-one art piece is an ERC-721 token. ERC-1155, proposed later that year, allows a single smart contract to manage both fungible and non-fungible tokens in the same deployment. A game studio can issue 10,000 identical healing potions and one legendary sword under the same contract, reducing gas costs and simplifying inventory logic.

The token itself does not store the image, video, or file it represents. Instead, it holds a pointer, usually a URI, that links to metadata hosted elsewhere. That metadata describes the asset and may include a link to the actual media file, often stored on IPFS or Arweave for durability. When someone says they “own an NFT,” they own the on-chain token and whatever rights the creator attached to it. The media file could, in theory, disappear if the hosting fails, which is why decentralized storage matters.

Minting is the process of creating an NFT. A creator deploys or interacts with a smart contract, which writes a new token ID to the blockchain. From that point forward, every transfer of ownership is recorded publicly. Buyers need a compatible crypto wallet to hold and transact with their tokens.

A short history of non-fungible tokens The concept predates the 2021 boom by several years. Colored Coins on Bitcoin in 2012 explored the idea of attaching unique metadata to satoshis. The Counterparty platform followed in 2014, enabling custom token creation on Bitcoin. Rare Pepes, trading cards minted on Counterparty in 2016, became some of the earliest examples of digital collectibles with secondary-market value.

CryptoPunks launched on Ethereum in June 2017, giving away 10,000 algorithmically generated pixel portraits for free. Larva Labs, the studio behind the project, did not even use the ERC-721 standard because it had not been written yet. CryptoKitties followed in late 2017, briefly congesting the Ethereum network as users bred and traded digital cats. That congestion, ironically, proved that demand for on-chain collectibles was real enough to stress a major blockchain.

NBA Top Shot, built on the Flow blockchain by Dapper Labs, brought NFTs to mainstream sports audiences in late 2020. Users purchased video highlight “moments” of NBA plays, and the platform generated over $700 million in sales within its first year. It was the first NFT project many non-crypto users encountered.

The real explosion came in early 2021. Beeple sold “Everydays: The First 5000 Days” at Christie’s for $69.3 million in March of that year. Within months, monthly NFT trading volumes on OpenSea alone surpassed $3 billion. Celebrities, sports leagues, and fashion brands rushed in. Adidas, Nike (through its RTFKT acquisition), and Gucci all launched NFT collections. By early 2022, the hype peaked.

Then came the correction. As crypto markets contracted through 2022 and 2023, speculative NFT collections lost 90% or more of their floor prices. OpenSea laid off staff. Several high-profile projects abandoned their roadmaps. Critics declared the technology a fad. The total NFT sales volume for the first half of 2025 came in at $2.82 billion, a fraction of the 2021 peak but still a sign of persistent demand.

But beneath the noise, builders kept shipping. Blur launched in late 2022 and introduced a trader-focused marketplace model that rewarded active traders with token incentives. Magic Eden expanded from Solana to support Ethereum, Bitcoin Ordinals, and other chains, positioning itself as the leading multi-chain marketplace. By cumulative volume as of 2026, OpenSea leads at $23.14 billion, followed by Blur at $8.54 billion and Magic Eden at $6.39 billion. Together those three platforms account for 82% of total NFT trading volume.

Where NFTs stand in 2026 The market has recovered on a fundamentally different footing. The global NFT industry was valued at $43.08 billion in 2025 and is on track to reach $60.82 billion in 2026, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 41.2%. The critical shift is that utility-driven categories now dominate.

Gaming NFTs alone capture 38% of total transaction volume. Asia leads global NFT ownership with 2.8 million holders, the largest regional concentration. Monthly active traders exceeded 820,000 in October 2025, suggesting sustained participation well beyond a handful of whales.

This is not the same market that peaked on profile-picture hype. The median transaction size is smaller, the use cases are broader, and the infrastructure is more mature. Layer-2 rollups and account abstraction have reduced gas costs and simplified the user experience to the point where many buyers do not even know they are interacting with a blockchain.

Token-bound accounts, introduced through ERC-6551, have added another dimension. Under this standard, an NFT itself can own other assets. A game character NFT can hold its own inventory of weapon and armor tokens, all bundled together. When the character sells, its entire inventory transfers with it. This kind of composability was not possible in the early NFT era and represents a meaningful step toward more complex on-chain ownership structures.

Real utility beyond digital art The most significant growth in NFTs since 2024 has come from applications that have nothing to do with collectible images.

Gaming and virtual worlds. In-game items such as weapons, skins, land parcels, and characters are increasingly issued as NFTs on chains like Immutable X and Polygon. The key advantage is interoperability. A rare item earned in one game can, if both developers support the same standard, be used or sold in another. This model is still maturing, but major studios including Ubisoft and Square Enix have run pilot programs, and the gaming share of NFT volume speaks for itself.

Real world asset tokenization. Physical goods are being paired with on-chain tokens that serve as certificates of authenticity and ownership. Luxury watches, handbags, fine art, and real estate shares now have “digital twin” NFTs that travel with the asset through secondary markets. This category bridges traditional finance and decentralized finance in a way that purely digital collectibles never did.

Ticketing and access passes. Event tickets issued as NFTs solve counterfeiting and scalping problems by tying each ticket to a verifiable on-chain record. Organizers can program royalties on secondary sales, enforce transfer restrictions, or unlock post-event perks for holders. Platforms including GET Protocol and YellowHeart have processed millions of NFT tickets.

Identity and credentials. Soulbound tokens, non-transferable NFTs proposed by Vitalik Buterin in 2022, are being explored for diplomas, professional certifications, and membership badges. Because they cannot be sold or transferred, they serve as verifiable credentials tied to a specific wallet.

Music royalties. Artists are tokenizing fractional ownership of royalty streams, letting fans invest directly in songs. Platforms like Sound.xyz have distributed royalties to token holders, creating a new revenue model that bypasses traditional label structures. The appeal for musicians is direct-to-fan economics: rather than receiving a fraction of a cent per stream, an artist can sell a limited edition of 1,000 NFTs representing a share of a song’s future earnings and capture revenue immediately at the point of sale.

How the environmental picture changed Before September 2022, the environmental criticism was legitimate. Ethereum ran on proof of work, the same energy-hungry consensus mechanism that Bitcoin still uses. Minting a single NFT on proof-of-work Ethereum consumed energy comparable to days of household electricity use in some estimates.

The Merge, completed on September 15, 2022, switched Ethereum to proof of stake. According to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, this cut Ethereum electricity consumption by 99.99%. A proof-of-stake validator runs on hardware no more demanding than a consumer laptop and consumes a fraction of the energy that a single mining rig required.

Since the vast majority of NFTs are minted on Ethereum, Polygon, Solana, and other proof-of-stake chains, the energy argument against NFTs no longer holds at scale. The exception is Bitcoin Ordinals, inscriptions written directly onto the Bitcoin blockchain, which does still operate on proof of work. However, Ordinals represent a small fraction of the overall NFT market.

This does not mean NFTs have zero environmental footprint. Data centers, network infrastructure, and user devices all consume energy. But the orders-of-magnitude reduction from the Merge moved the conversation from “NFTs are an environmental disaster” to “NFTs consume about as much energy as any other web service.”

The legal and intellectual property landscape Buying an NFT does not automatically grant copyright, trademark rights, or commercial use rights to the underlying work. What a buyer receives depends entirely on the license the creator attaches. Some projects, like Bored Ape Yacht Club, grant holders full commercial rights. Others reserve all rights for the original creator.

Courts are beginning to set precedent. The Yuga Labs v. Ripps ruling at the circuit level confirmed that an NFT qualifies as goods under the Lanham Act, giving trademark holders a legal pathway to challenge infringing NFT collections. The joint USPTO and U.S. Copyright Office report on NFTs and intellectual property, published in 2023, concluded that existing intellectual property frameworks broadly apply to NFTs but acknowledged gaps in enforcement, especially across jurisdictions.

AI-generated NFT art adds another layer of complexity. Under current U.S. copyright doctrine, a work must have a human author to receive protection. Purely AI-generated images used as NFTs likely cannot be copyrighted, leaving their creators with limited legal recourse if the work is copied.

Royalty enforcement is another unresolved area. Early NFT marketplaces honored creator royalties on secondary sales as a social norm, but newer platforms began making royalties optional to attract volume. This created a race to the bottom where creators saw their revenue streams cut. On-chain royalty enforcement through smart contracts offers a partial solution, but it only works when the buyer stays within a single marketplace ecosystem.

Jurisdiction remains the hardest problem. NFTs exist on decentralized networks that span every country simultaneously. A creator in France, a buyer in Japan, and a marketplace server in the United States each fall under different legal regimes, and no international framework specifically governs NFT transactions yet. The European Union’s MiCA regulation, which took full effect in late 2024, covers certain crypto assets but does not explicitly address most NFTs unless they qualify as financial instruments.

Limitations and open problems NFTs solve the ownership-record problem elegantly, but they do not solve every problem their advocates claim.

Metadata fragility. If the server or IPFS pin hosting an NFT’s image goes offline, the token still exists on-chain, but it points to nothing. Permanent storage solutions like Arweave help, but not every project uses them.

Wash trading. Inflated volume numbers have plagued NFT marketplaces. A single user trading between their own wallets can artificially boost a collection’s apparent demand. Marketplace incentive programs, where platforms reward trading volume with token airdrops, have made this worse.

Interoperability gaps. Cross-chain NFT transfers remain clunky. Bridging an NFT from Ethereum to Solana is not as simple as sending a stablecoin. Standards differ, metadata formats vary, and bridge exploits have caused significant losses.

Scams and rug pulls. The low barrier to minting means anyone can create a collection, promise a roadmap, and disappear with buyer funds. Due diligence is entirely on the buyer in most cases.

Speculation versus use. While utility is growing, a significant portion of NFT volume still comes from traders flipping tokens for short-term profit. Distinguishing genuine demand from speculative churn remains difficult even with on-chain data.

Royalty erosion. Creator royalties on secondary sales were once a defining feature of NFTs, promising ongoing income for artists. In practice, marketplace competition has eroded enforcement, and many platforms now treat royalties as optional. Builders are working on smart-contract-level enforcement, but no widely adopted standard has solved this completely.

User experience barriers. Despite improvements in wallet design and account abstraction, onboarding a non-crypto user to buy their first NFT still involves friction: setting up a wallet, acquiring tokens for gas, understanding approvals, and navigating marketplace interfaces that assume blockchain literacy.

What this does not cover This guide focuses on what NFTs are, how they work, and where they apply. It does not cover how to mint your own NFT collection, detailed smart contract development in Solidity, specific investment advice on any NFT project or collection, technical tutorials for building on ERC-721 or ERC-1155, or the broader crypto ecosystem beyond the NFT-specific layer. Each of those topics warrants its own deep dive.

Practical checks Verify metadata storage before buying. Check whether the NFT’s image and metadata are stored on IPFS, Arweave, or another decentralized solution. If the metadata URL points to a centralized server, the asset is only as durable as that server.

Read the license, not the marketing. Before assuming commercial rights, find the actual license terms attached to the NFT project. Many collections grant no rights beyond personal display. The difference between “you own the IP” and “you own a token” is the difference between a business asset and a collectible.

Use a hardware wallet for high-value holdings. NFT theft through phishing and malicious approvals is common. A hardware wallet that requires physical confirmation for each transaction is the strongest defense against remote exploits. Review your wallet’s token approvals regularly and revoke any you do not recognize.

Check on-chain provenance, not marketplace screenshots. Verify ownership history directly on a block explorer like Etherscan. Marketplace interfaces can lag, display errors, or be spoofed. On-chain data is the only source of truth for who owns what and when it changed hands.

Start with established marketplaces. OpenSea, Blur, and Magic Eden each offer different strengths, but all three provide baseline protections against fraudulent listings. Avoid purchasing from unfamiliar sites that ask for wallet permissions you do not understand.

What does NFT stand for? NFT stands for non-fungible token. “Non-fungible” means the item is unique and cannot be swapped one-to-one with another token of the same type, unlike currencies or commodity tokens that are interchangeable.

How is an NFT different from cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin or ether are fungible, meaning each unit is identical and interchangeable. An NFT is a unique token with its own identifier. You can trade one bitcoin for another and have the same value; you cannot do the same with two different NFTs because each represents a distinct asset. Both live on blockchains, but they serve fundamentally different purposes: cryptocurrency is a medium of exchange, while an NFT is a certificate of ownership for a specific item.

Do NFTs have value in 2026? Yes. The NFT market is projected at $60.82 billion in 2026. However, value varies enormously by category. Gaming items, event tickets, and RWA tokens generate consistent demand, while speculative art collections remain volatile. An NFT is only as valuable as the utility or cultural significance behind it.

Are NFTs bad for the environment? The vast majority of NFTs are now minted on proof-of-stake blockchains. Ethereum cut its energy consumption by 99.99% after moving to proof of stake in September 2022. NFTs on Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and similar chains have a minimal energy footprint comparable to standard web services. The one exception is Bitcoin Ordinals, which rely on proof-of-work mining. However, Ordinals account for a small share of total NFT activity.

What happens if the image linked to my NFT disappears? The token itself remains on the blockchain, but it would point to a dead link. This is why decentralized storage matters. NFTs with metadata on IPFS or Arweave are far more durable than those hosted on centralized servers. Always check where an NFT’s metadata is stored before purchasing.

Can someone copy the image of my NFT? Anyone can right-click and save a JPEG, but they cannot replicate the on-chain token that proves ownership. The value of an NFT is the verifiable ownership record, not the image file itself. Think of it like a deed to a house: anyone can photograph the building, but only the deed holder owns the property.

Do I own the copyright when I buy an NFT? Not automatically. Copyright ownership depends on the license the creator attaches to the project. Some collections, such as Bored Ape Yacht Club, grant full commercial rights to holders. Others retain all intellectual property rights with the original artist. Always read the specific terms before assuming you can commercially use the underlying work.

What is the safest way to store NFTs? A hardware wallet offers the highest security for NFT storage. Devices from Ledger and Trezor require physical confirmation for every transaction, which prevents remote attackers from moving your assets. Pair a hardware wallet with regular approval audits on Etherscan to revoke permissions you no longer need.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency and NFT markets are volatile and carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research and consult qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Information is current as of September 2, 2026, and may become outdated.

Trump: Preparing to Strike Iran Again, We Have Full Control of the Strait

U.S. President Donald Trump met with U.S. tourism industry executives at the White House on Wednesday local time, during which he again discussed the Iran issue. Trump said: "The Iranian regime is collapsing, a new round of strikes against Iran will not take long, and we are prepared to launch another strike on Iran in the future. We have full control over the Strait of Hormuz, through which millions of barrels of oil are exported daily. I hope domestic retail gasoline prices will drop."

4 minutes ago

CZ: Some hot money is flowing back from the AI sector to the crypto market, and the crypto industry will not disappear.

Binance founder CZ published a post noting that some "hot money" is flowing back from the AI sector to the crypto market. Currency-related industries will not disappear, as both individuals and AI will still need currency in the future.

4 minutes ago

Ansem: Crypto Market Remains in the Early Stage of a Bull Run, Retail Investors Are Entering with More Capital

Crypto KOL Ansem posted an article stating that the crypto market is still in the early stages of a bull run, and the key to generating returns at this stage is to identify assets with asymmetric upside while tolerating short-term volatility. Over the past two years, rotating between meme coins and new trading pairs has been the dominant strategy, with lower valuation caps leading traders to favor short-term holdings; however, in a bull market, high-quality assets offer greater upside potential, so extending holding periods after careful selection may prove more advantageous. Ansem believes retail investors are entering the crypto market with more capital. The growth of mobile users on Pump.fun and Fomo, as well as Robinhood Chain’s ongoing efforts to convert stock traders to on-chain activities, all indicate that market liquidity may increase in the future. New users pay relatively less attention to market capitalization changes, so tokens that gain widespread traction may receive stronger capital inflows. He also noted that the trend toward short-form video has led fewer and fewer investors to read project whitepapers or research token differences, which in turn creates opportunities for those willing to build a complete investment thesis and exercise patience. However, traders still need to set criteria for when they are wrong, review the reasons for missing out on high-growth assets, and define conditions for re-entering the market after selling too early.

4 minutes ago

Arbitrum DAO generated $6.19 million in revenue in the first half of the year, with Robinhood Chain emerging as a new revenue source.

An unaudited report released by the Arbitrum Foundation shows that Arbitrum DAO generated $6.19 million in revenue in the first half of 2026, with sources including Arbitrum One transaction fees, Timeboost sequencing priority auctions, scaling program licensing fees, and treasury management returns. The protocol’s gross profit margin exceeded 97%, and non-ARB treasury assets stood at $125 million as of the end of June. In H1 2026, Arbitrum processed a total of 478 million transactions, accounting for roughly 18% of its cumulative lifetime total of 2.7 billion transactions; monthly average stablecoin transfer volume surpassed $70 billion, and the number of stablecoin holders rose 40% to 10.5 million. Additionally, Arbitrum has deployed over 2,000 tokenized RWAs. Robinhood Chain, built on Arbitrum’s tech stack, launched its mainnet on July 1, contributing $360,000 in licensing fees to the DAO that month, making up 35% of its monthly revenue. On September 1, Robinhood Chain hit daily fees of $3.75 million, decentralized exchange (DEX) volume exceeding $1.5 billion, and total value locked (TVL) of over $750 million.

4 minutes ago

Agent of "BTC OG Insider Whale": Bitcoin has held the $76,600 support level; if it breaks through $79,000, it could test higher highs.

Garrett Jin, the representative of the "BTC OG Insider Whale", stated in a post that Bitcoin (BTC) has held the critical level of $76,600. If BTC climbs further above $79,000, the price may attempt to form a higher high. However, even if BTC does post a higher high, this would still not be sufficient to confirm a genuine breakout in the market.

4 minutes ago

NVIDIA rises nearly 5%, with its current market capitalization standing at $5.49 trillion.

According to market data from BIT (bit.com), NVIDIA's stock rose 4.82%, with its current market capitalization standing at $5.49 trillion.

4 minutes ago

Mastercard has taken a prominent step in the crypto space by joining an upcoming XRP Ledger hackathon in New York as a sponsor. The global payments leader is set to participate in the 36-hour developer event scheduled for October 24 and 25, bringing together teams aiming to build and launch projects on the XRP Ledger prior to Ripple‘s Swell conference, which will follow in the next week.

Mastercard deepens XRPL involvementThe hackathon will focus on four primary tracks: protocol innovation, agentic finance, lending, and borrowing. Organizers have also called on existing developer teams to consider integrating XRPL features into their current projects.

Mastercard’s engagement with Ripple has been gradually expanding over the past year. In November 2024, Ripple announced a partnership with Mastercard, WebBank, and Gemini, revolving around Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin. This collaboration followed the launch of a special XRP-compatible Mastercard credit card by Gemini in August of last year.

As investors react to rapid shifts driven by central bank decisions or sudden altcoin listings, the need for more efficient tools has become a focal point in the community. Rather than managing charts, news, and portfolios across multiple platforms, traders are now turning to privacy-first solutions like CryptoAppsy. The platform allows users to view real-time charts, access smart price alerts and coin-specific news, and track macroeconomic data—all on a single screen, without requiring account registration.

Peter Brandt shifts Bitcoin outlookIn the latest market developments, Bitcoin surged to $72,335, prompting notable trader Peter Brandt to abandon his bearish outlook and open a long position. Brandt, who leads Factor LLC, credited a decisive breakout from an infrequent inverted head-and-shoulders chart pattern as the cause for his shift in strategy, ending what had been an extended period of declines for the top cryptocurrency.

Brandt had previously expressed concerns about Bitcoin’s trajectory, suggesting there was a significant chance for a further drop, particularly as the broader trend pointed downward. However, once the CME Bitcoin futures (BTC-056 contract) price broke decisively above the crucial neckline of the pattern, the outlook reversed, resulting in a daily gain of $2,585 and driving the asset sharply higher.

Due to the prolonged formation of the right shoulder, Brandt had assessed a 60/40 probability favoring a downside resolution, especially since the broader trend had been bearish, but the technical breakout changed that dynamic.

Protest at Ripple co-founder’s homeIn San Francisco, a group of Sunrise Movement activists gathered outside the home of Chris Larsen, Ripple’s co-founder, as part of a nationwide protest targeting the use of automated license plate readers and law enforcement surveillance technology.

The demonstration, which took place on Friday, was aimed at criticizing Larsen for backing the city’s expansion of police surveillance systems. Protesters distributed flyers on the risks posed by Flock cameras and carried a mock surveillance camera to highlight their concerns, with a message asking if this approach makes residents feel safer.

Luc Bouchard, a local Sunrise Movement organizer, stated that the group doubts automated license plate readers are effective in curbing crime and argued that resources would be better invested in affordable housing.

BlackRock leads US Ethereum ETF inflowsBlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has posted more than $1.02 billion in net inflows over nine straight US trading sessions from August 17 to August 27, according to data from SoSoValue and reports compiled by Farside.

During this period, ETHA captured roughly 72% of the total net inflows into spot Ethereum ETFs in the US market. The broader group of funds attracted around $1.42 billion in the same span, while ETHA consistently avoided outflows.

On August 28, the US spot Ethereum ETF market saw an additional $102.1 million in net inflows. ETHA remained at the forefront, taking in approximately $83.8 million that day as demand for BlackRock’s offering continued to outpace its competitors.

ETHA accumulated $889.8 million in its first eight trading sessions, underscoring strong investor demand for exposure to Ethereum via BlackRock’s ETF product.

Shiba Inu gains exposure in Japan with new exchange listingJapan’s Shiba Inu community is gaining momentum after the country’s first new registration of a crypto asset exchange operator since 2022. Laser Digital Japan, the local unit of Nomura’s digital assets division, confirmed it has secured registration and can now operate as a crypto asset exchange service provider under the Payment Services Act.

This milestone follows four years without new entrants to Japan’s crypto asset industry, a period in which the country has implemented sweeping regulatory reforms, especially regarding stablecoins. Institutional sentiment has turned more positive as digital assets are increasingly seen as diversification tools, with Shiba Inu set to benefit from the growing presence of exchanges like Laser Digital Japan.

Something interesting is happening on Ethereum. The network’s own activity metrics are sliding, but the DeFi protocols built on top of it are quietly thriving.

Ethereum’s daily active addresses fell from over 1.5 million in January to roughly 544,000 by July, a decline of about 64%. At the same time, DeFi protocols like Aave are seeing a surge in new wallet creation, with Aave adding 1,806 new wallets on Ethereum on June 30 alone. That was its highest single-day total since October 2021.

The numbers behind the divergence Ethereum’s broader network saw new-address creation average 327,000 per day in mid-January, with a single-day peak near 394,000. Those figures were boosted by the Fusaka upgrade in late 2025, which slashed transaction fees and made stablecoin transfers significantly cheaper.

Total value locked across Ethereum’s DeFi ecosystem held steady at roughly $41 billion as of July, showing resilience even as the headline metrics deteriorated.

Advertisement

Data from analytics platforms including Santiment and Dune supports this read. Wallet growth in DeFi-specific protocols, particularly those focused on borrowing and lending, is outpacing the broader Ethereum trend.

What’s driving DeFi wallet growth Lending protocols like Aave operate on a fundamentally different dynamic. Users who deposit collateral or take out loans tend to maintain their positions over weeks or months, not hours.

The Fusaka upgrade played a supporting role here too. By reducing gas fees substantially, it lowered the barrier to entry for DeFi participation. Stablecoin transfers became cheaper, which matters enormously for lending protocols where stablecoin deposits form a large share of available liquidity.

Lower fees also mean that smaller positions become economically viable. A user who might have been priced out of depositing $500 into Aave when gas costs ate 5% of their position can now participate without that friction.

What this means for the Ethereum ecosystem The divergence raises a legitimate question about how to measure Ethereum’s health. A 64% decline in six months coincides with TVL holding steady at $41 billion and DeFi protocols posting multi-year highs in wallet creation.

Layer-2 solutions have already siphoned some transaction volume away from the main chain, and the cooling of NFT speculation removes another source of demand for ETH as gas.

Aave’s June 30 spike was impressive, but a single-day record doesn’t guarantee a trend. The users who remain are the ones actually using financial products, not speculating on digital art.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

20h05 ▪ 5 min read ▪ by Lydie M.

Summarize this article with:

Grayscale, a16z and the Crypto Council for Innovation ask the SEC not to automatically tighten the rules for the new generation of ETFs. The crypto sector especially refuses that Bitcoin, Ethereum or other digital assets be placed in the same category as private asset funds, leveraged strategies or event contracts. The three organizations want faster reviews tailored to the real risk of each product.

In brief Grayscale, a16z and the CCI sent their proposals to the SEC at the end of August. a16z asks the SEC not to treat all new ETFs as a single category. Grayscale notably wants to establish a confidential procedure before the official submission of a file. Crypto refuses a single rule for all ETFs The SEC has been working on this file for several weeks. The regulator opened at the end of June a consultation on new ETFs and digital assets. Grayscale and a16z have now responded.

The common point between their letters is quite clear: a crypto ETF should not automatically face new constraints simply because the SEC considers it “novel,” that is, new or unusual. The category studied by the regulator is very broad.

It can include products exposed to crypto, private assets, commodities, a single stock, highly leveraged strategies, or prediction markets. a16z believes these products do not present the same liquidity, valuation, or investor protection issues.

The company also recalls that crypto ETFs and ETPs now have a more developed infrastructure. Bitcoin and Ethereum have already set precedents. Solana also has products listed in the United States. For a16z, starting almost from scratch for each new category therefore does not make much sense.

Grayscale and a16z propose two different paths However, the two groups do not agree on everything. a16z wants to keep the current definition of an “investment company” provided by the Investment Company Act of 1940. A product that mainly holds assets that are not financial securities should not automatically fall into this category.

Grayscale defends a similar position. The manager notably refuses that the SEC impose new portfolio conditions, minimum quotas of financial securities, or additional restrictions on crypto products that already have a compliance history. The matter is becoming concrete for Grayscale. The group also removed three Cardano, Hedera, and Polkadot ETF applications in August.

Another problem: timing. Today, an issuer can finish part of the registration of its fund while the authorization for listing by the exchange is still pending. a16z wants to better coordinate these two procedures. The company proposes standardized timelines, shorter reviews, and, when possible, simultaneous processing of applications.

Grayscale puts forward another idea. The group wants an optional and confidential procedure before the public filing, with a defined response time for SEC staff. The CCI also supports this mechanism. It notably mentions the problem of files copied very quickly after their publication, a phenomenon that the use of AI could accelerate even more.

The next wave of crypto ETFs is happening now The market concerned is already large. Assets held in US ETFs exceed 12 trillion dollars according to figures cited in the responses addressed to the SEC. More than 4,600 funds are now available.

Crypto represents only part of this market. But it is advancing quickly. US spot Bitcoin ETFs recently approached 100 billion dollars in assets. Ethereum and Solana also have their own products, while managers are testing assets increasingly distant from the two large cryptos.

One detail still divides the players. a16z would like to reserve the term “ETF” for funds registered under the Investment Company Act. Other products would be clearly identified as ETPs. Grayscale opposes this. For the manager, the term ETF can also describe a listed product with an arbitrage mechanism and a transparent price, regardless of its precise legal framework.

The CCI prefers clearer information on the regulatory status of each product rather than a complete change of names. The SEC must now decide between investor protection, speed of procedures, and the arrival of much more varied crypto products. As for the candidates, they are no longer waiting for Bitcoin or Ethereum: Grayscale has, for example, filed an application to launch a BNB ETF on Nasdaq.

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

Join the program

A

A

Lien copié

Lydie M.

Enseignante et ingénieure IT, Lydie découvre le Bitcoin en 2022 et plonge dans l’univers des cryptomonnaies. Elle vulgarise des sujets complexes, décrypte les enjeux du Web3 et défend une vision d’un futur numérique ouvert, inclusif et décentralisé.

DISCLAIMER

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author, and should not be taken as investment advice. Do your own research before taking any investment decisions.

TLDR Crypto funds pulled in $3.2 billion last week, the largest weekly inflow since October 2025. BlackRock’s IBIT led the pack with $928 million, adding to $1.3 billion the week before. Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Hyperliquid, and Dogecoin funds all kept their inflow streaks alive. Crypto funds have averaged $1.3 billion in weekly inflows for four straight weeks. Bitcoin funds saw a brief outflow, pointing to a possible shift toward altcoins. Crypto funds took in $3.2 billion last week. This is the biggest weekly inflow the sector has seen since October 2025.

The data comes from The Kobeissi Letter, which tracks fund flows across the crypto market. It shows investors are putting money into both crypto and gold funds at the same time.

BlackRock’s IBIT fund led the way. It brought in $928 million last week alone.

That follows $1.3 billion the week before. Together, IBIT pulled in more than $2.2 billion over two weeks.

Bitcoin was not the only asset getting attention. Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Hyperliquid, and Dogecoin funds also kept their inflow streaks going.

Four Weeks of Steady Inflows Crypto funds have now averaged $1.3 billion in weekly inflows for four straight weeks. That is the strongest four-week pace the market has seen in about ten months.

The steady pace suggests demand has held up over time. It has not been a single spike.

But there is a twist in the data. Money appears to be moving from Bitcoin toward other coins.

A Shift From Bitcoin to Altcoins U.S. Bitcoin funds saw a nine-day inflow streak come to an end. That week, they recorded $202 million in outflows.

Even so, Bitcoin funds still pulled in $925 million for the week overall. IBIT alone brought in $938 million during that stretch.

Ethereum funds told a different story. They saw $824 million in weekly inflows.

An extra $102 million came in on August 28. That extended Ethereum’s inflow streak to 10 sessions in a row.

Solana and XRP funds also picked up fresh money during the same period.

This pattern has led some analysts to suggest investors are shifting toward altcoins. The move appears to be happening ahead of what traders call the “September effect.”

Scott Melker, known online as “The Wolf of All Streets,” commented on the trend. He said, “The bid rotated. It did not reverse.”

US Bitcoin ETFs just snapped a 9-day inflow streak.

Here's what you need to know:

1) US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $202 million in net outflows on Friday, the first red day in 9 sessions

2) The same week, those funds still took in $925 million

3) BlackRock's IBIT alone took in… pic.twitter.com/kzhxjv4zZx

— The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) August 31, 2026

His comment points to a change in where money is going, rather than a drop in overall demand.

The latest weekly numbers show crypto funds are still pulling in cash across the board. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, Hyperliquid, and Dogecoin funds have all posted inflows in recent weeks.

The four-week streak of $1.3 billion in average weekly inflows remains intact as of the most recent data. Whether the rotation from Bitcoin to altcoins continues will depend on flows in the coming weeks.

Remixpoint, a Tokyo-listed energy and digital asset firm, has exited every altcoin on its balance sheet.

In a timely disclosure filed on September 2, 2026, the company confirmed it sold all of its Ethereum, Solana, XRP, and Dogecoin on September 1.

The total proceeds came to ¥878,814,569 (~$5.5 million). After the sales, the firm now holds only Bitcoin, approximately 1,506 BTC, cementing its shift to a pure Remixpoint Bitcoin treasury strategy.

Four Altcoins Sold in One Day, Dogecoin Was the Only Loser The sales covered four assets in a single trading day. Remixpoint sold 901.44 ETH, 13,920 SOL, 1.19 million XRP, and 2.8 million DOGE.

Against a combined book value of ¥761 million, the firm booked a gain of ¥117,772,649 (~$737,000). ETH and SOL carried the bulk of the profit.

XRP came in as a modest gain. Dogecoin was the only position sold at a loss, at ¥3.25 million below cost.

The sale was executed into a turbulent tape. As CoinGape had reported, Bitcoin fell below $77,000 as fresh U.S. military strikes triggered a broad risk-off selloff on September 1.

Despite that backdrop, Remixpoint still closed the altcoin stack in profit relative to its fiscal-year opening book value.

This signals the sales were a planned strategy close-out. Not capitulation.

Meanwhile, other firms are moving in a different direction on the very same assets.

SharpLink has resumed Ethereum accumulation, and Solana treasury firm DFDV resumed SOL purchases as prices climbed above $100.

Remixpoint’s exit makes it an outlier among DAT peers still stacking altcoins.

Remixpoint Joins Japan’s BTC-Only Treasury Wave, But Charts Its Own Course This move places Remixpoint firmly inside Japan’s growing wave of Bitcoin treasury companies. Yet the firm’s path differs from peers like Metaplanet.

Japan’s largest Bitcoin treasury, Metaplanet, recently added 2,823 BTC, while also launching its U.S. Superplanet vehicle and deploying Bitcoin as productive collateral.

Metaplanet is scaling aggressively. Remixpoint, by contrast, sold its altcoin sleeve to fund grid-scale battery projects.

The company’s own disclosure confirms BTC also generated yield during the holding period.

Bitcoin lending between February and August 2026 produced 14.92 BTC, worth approximately ¥164.21 million.

August alone yielded 2.48 BTC (~¥31.15 million). Combined ETH and SOL staking over the same window added ¥29.87 million.

Management’s logic is clear: BTC serves as both the reserve asset and the yield engine. Altcoin staking was not worth the complexity.

The XRP exit is particularly notable given Japan’s regulatory direction. Lawmakers are advancing a bill to treat Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP like stocks, which could cut crypto tax toward 20%.

At the same time, SBI Holdings is still expanding XRP rails and gaming firm Gumi is adding both BTC and XRP.

Remixpoint’s XRP exit is one mid-cap treasury de-risking, not a signal that Japan is abandoning the asset.

Globally, the DAT debate is also shifting. Strategy has authorized Bitcoin sales for credit and dividend purposes, though Michael Saylor insists the firm will remain a net Bitcoin buyer.

Smaller Japanese firms like ANAP have also entered the BTC treasury space. Remixpoint’s ¥117.8 million profit will book as Q2 FY2027 revenue, quarter ending September 30, 2026.

Proceeds are directed toward battery storage expansion and strengthening shareholder value.

Our guide compares top decentralized futures exchanges by liquidity and fees.

Dogecoin has lost a crucial technical support, trading at $0.0808 after failing to sustain gains from its August rally. The meme-inspired cryptocurrency slipped beneath the 100-day exponential moving average (EMA) at $0.0816, a level that previously played a decisive role during Dogecoin’s price movements since May.

Technical breakdown threatens bullish momentumEarlier in August, DOGE surged from around $0.07 to just above $0.094, briefly testing the 200-day EMA, which sits at $0.0944. However, buyers could not maintain momentum at this long-term average, and the price quickly reversed. The ensuing series of lower highs brought Dogecoin back toward the 100-day EMA, where it struggled to hold support.

The recent breakdown below $0.0816 invalidated one of the stronger points in Dogecoin’s August recovery. Now, the token hovers near its shorter-term moving average of $0.0805, with a compressed support area forming between $0.080 and $0.082.

Technical analysts warn that a clear daily close below this tight cluster could open the door for a further drop toward the 50-day EMA, which is now close to $0.0752. Beyond that, the next major downside target lies in the former consolidation zone, spanning roughly $0.069 to $0.072.

Momentum fades as RSI coolsDogecoin’s momentum has also waned following the failed breakout. The Relative Strength Index (RSI), which temporarily entered strongly overbought territory during the early August rally, has retreated toward 51. Rather than indicating oversold conditions, this suggests that the bullish energy from the initial surge has largely dissipated.

If DOGE cannot quickly reclaim the 100-day EMA, technical specialists believe the recovery prospects will remain limited. Regaining a footing above $0.082 would help stabilize the structure, shifting the focus to the next resistance band between $0.085 and $0.090. Until this level is recovered, downside risks are expected to dominate price action.

Emerging trends in asset tradingAs market participants monitor price patterns and support levels in assets like Dogecoin, a broader shift is occurring in how investors manage and trade different assets. While traditional markets have often depended on complex intermediaries and brokers, Wall Street is now experiencing a transition to Web3-powered platforms. Investors are increasingly adopting services such as 1stepSwap to hold tokenized shares of major U.S. companies, gold, and silver directly within their crypto wallets, eliminating the need for middlemen. By bringing real-world assets (RWAs) on-chain and using algorithms to identify optimal market prices instantly, these platforms offer users direct, rapid, and transparent access to a diverse range of assets.

The unsuccessful hold above the 100-day EMA has invalidated key aspects of the August rebound, casting doubt on the recovery thesis for Dogecoin. Unless the price reclaims $0.082 soon, further retracement toward the mid-summer lows appears increasingly likely.

Table of contents

Japan-listed Remixpoint said on September 2 that it had sold its entire holdings of Ether, Solana, XRP and Dogecoin one day earlier, leaving Bitcoin as the company’s only cryptocurrency asset. The disposal generated ¥878.8 million in proceeds and a ¥117.8 million gain, according to the company’s Tokyo Stock Exchange disclosure. Remixpoint said the change concentrates its digital-asset portfolio around Bitcoin and is intended to clarify its operating policy and improve capital efficiency.

Four Altcoin Positions Exit the Balance Sheet The company sold 901.44672542 ETH for ¥353.4 million, 13,920.07255868 SOL for ¥227.9 million, 1.191 million XRP for ¥260.4 million and 2.802 million DOGE for ¥37.1 million. The ETH position produced a ¥60.2 million gain, while SOL added ¥49.3 million and XRP generated ¥11.5 million. Dogecoin was the only loss-making line, recording a ¥3.3 million deficit. Together, the four positions had a ¥761 million book value at the beginning of Remixpoint’s fiscal year ending March 2027.

The transaction changes the mix of the treasury rather than ending its crypto strategy. Remixpoint said it held approximately 1,506 BTC after the sale. That company-specific shift arrives as other Japanese treasury operators continue to manage large Bitcoin positions, including Metaplanet’s recent transfer of 3,000 BTC to Coinbase Prime.

Bitcoin Lending Adds ¥164.2 Million Remixpoint also reported 14.92055902 BTC in lending fees worth ¥164.2 million for the period from February 24 through August 31. The lending principal began at roughly 1,411 BTC in late February and stood at about 1,504 BTC at the start of August. Separately, staking 901.45 ETH and 13,920 SOL produced rewards worth ¥29.9 million between July 2025 and August 2026, with the rewards received in yen.

Those results show that the company’s treasury activity includes yield generation as well as asset appreciation. Unlike a passive holding policy, lending introduces counterparty and operational exposure alongside Bitcoin price risk. The new portfolio is simpler by asset count, but it remains concentrated in one volatile asset.

Sale Proceeds May Support Battery Assets Remixpoint expects to recognize about ¥117 million from the altcoin sale as business-unit revenue in the second quarter of its fiscal year ending March 2027. The company said it is considering using the proceeds to expand grid-scale battery assets, strengthen its financial base and fund other measures intended to increase corporate and shareholder value.

The disclosure does not commit the full proceeds to additional Bitcoin purchases. It instead separates the decision to retain a Bitcoin-only crypto portfolio from the possible deployment of the cash raised through the altcoin exit. That distinction matters as investors compare Remixpoint with the broader group of public companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets.

AUTHOR

Kester is an experienced freelance content writer. His focus is primarily on blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. One might even refer to him as a "blockchain enthusiast." He has been following advancements in the crypto and blockchain area for several years, researching and writing his insights in the media. In addition to being a skilled content writer, Mushumir is also knowledgeable in SEO and digital marketing. He aspires to succeed as a content creator in the digital realm, dealing with customers in the finance and tech industries to generate traffic through engaging taglines and content. Mushumir enjoys traveling, reading, and playing cricket when he is not writing. He now works as a news and article writer for BlockchainReporter.

A Close Call for Cardano GovernanceCardano (@cardano) has narrowly avoided a significant governance disruption after its Constitutional Committee renewal vote passed both required thresholds. DReps backed the update with 71.4% support, clearing the 67% threshold, while Stake Pool Operator (SPO) support reached 56.3%, surpassing the required 51%.

The stakes were high. Four of the committee's seven seats were set to expire at Epoch 653, and Intersect warned that a failed vote would reduce the committee to just three members, below the protocol's minimum size of five. That outcome would have effectively stalled most major on-chain governance actions, including treasury withdrawals, protocol parameter changes, hard fork initiations, and constitutional amendments, until the committee was rebuilt above the minimum threshold.

The renewal action, formally titled "Update Constitutional Committee 2026," was submitted on-chain on July 31 following an independently audited election. The four incoming members were elected through that community process and were ready to take their seats pending the on-chain vote.

Participation Concerns RemainWhile the outcome secured governance continuity, the margin on the SPO side exposed a structural weakness. Non-participating stake created most of the drag on approval, as uncast SPO votes count against ratification under Cardano's governance rules. The SPO threshold was cleared by a slim margin, pointing to a persistent participation gap that the community will need to address in future governance cycles.

The result keeps Cardano's three-pillar governance structure, comprising DReps, SPOs, and the Constitutional Committee, intact and functioning. The new members are set to serve terms running through Epoch 799, the maximum 146-epoch term permitted under the protocol.

Sources:
CryptoSlate: Cardano clears key voting thresholds for constitutional committee renewal
CryptoSlate: Cardano had two weeks to avoid a governance freeze
CryptoRank: Cardano governance freeze risk explained

COINDESK: Lawsuit challenges Tether for allegedly freezing $42.4 million USDT before U.S. warrant

Two Thai businessmen sued stablecoin issuer Tether in a New York district court, claiming it illegally froze $42.4 million in Tether USDt (USDT) in October, as part of a broader case tied to a pig butchering scheme.

In a Monday court filing, the plaintiffs claimed that Tether illegally froze the $42 million without a warrant in October 2025, following an informal request from US Homeland Security Investigations.

Authorities in the Eastern District of North Carolina only issued a seizure warrant for the funds later in February 2026, as part of a $61 million pig butchering case. The warrant directed the burn and reissuance of the tokens to a government wallet. 

While the plaintiffs didn’t dispute their involvement in the investment scam, the lawsuit tests the freezing authority of stablecoin issuers. It also requests that authorities unfreeze the funds and pay potential punitive damages. 

“The complaint is NOT denying that the government claims these coins are scam proceeds. It is saying Tether locked secondary-market holders first, kept earning Treasury yield on the reserves, and only later received a warrant that still does not, in plaintiffs’ view, authorize a private issuer to freeze, burn, or reissue their tokens,” wrote corporate and intellectual property attorney Ariel Givner in a Wednesday X post.

In a separate case in February, a US court sentenced a dual national of China and St. Kitts and Nevis to 20 years in prison for orchestrating a $73 million pig butchering scam.

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.